Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1954-12-14 Packet
Rt. 15, Box 215 Richmond, Virginia November 17, 1954 Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Chesterfield, Virginia c/o Mr. M. J. Burnette, Executive Secretary Gentlemen: Among the objectives of the Chesterfield County Civic Association is the promotion and practicing of good citizenship by all people in our democratic society in Chesterfield County. Out of this objective has developed a desire on the part of some individuals, whom we feel are qualified, to become police officers in our county. We therefore appeal to you at this time, to give favorable consideration to the appointment of Mr. William J. Rollings and Mr. William F. Harris, who are Negroes if, and when vacancies occur, or, if it is found advisable to increase your present quota of police officers. Sincerely yours, The Chesterfield County Civic Assn. f R. Scott Harris, President j/ .�4 Ettrick, Va. March 17, 1954 Mr. M. W. Burnett Executive Secretary Chesterfield Courthouse Chesterfield, Va, Dear Mr, Burnett: Due to the advice of my Physician I am offering this my resignation as a member of Chesterfield Planning Commission. It has been a pleasure working with this commission and it is my wish that you and every member will be successful in all your undertakings. Thanking every one for your kindness to me, I am HAH/sp Yours very trulys H. A. Hawkins 9 WELFARE AND INSTITUTIONS SLOG. .i... ■CLVIDER6 ST., RICHMOND IIO. VA. .x4c-)NWEALT H-- GO1 *00 OF 'NIA - DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE AND INSTITUTIONS November 15, 1954 Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Chesterfield County Chesterfield Court Douse, Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: The State Board of Welfare and Institutions at its regular meeting on November 9 discussed the resolution from the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors requesting more effective protective measures at Camp #24. The Board has requested that I advise you of the current situation at this camp. A special review of the inmates of this camp was made by the Classification Section and those men who were considered serious escape risks have been transferred to other camps. Additional supervision has been added, and we are hopeful that the problem has been minimized. As you know, this is a new camp and there has been perhaps some difficulty in getting settled. We hope that these problems now have been solved. I shall be glad to discuss the problem with you or with members of the Board of Supervisors at any time. Sincerely yours, Richard W. Copeland, Director Department of Welfare and Institutions wbsresse it has crow the Mitt) ation of the resiaie Uvo? th o wagstaif Cfr®lAe CoaaaenitIv of Chesterfield *un , � ohs Bmp� a United of the States in the decision of May 17# 2954 =a that segregates of the rates in the public schuooU Is unconstitutional and the . a Ou" intended to enter a dsorse iaepl es smung sub d ootsionat s eeo time in the f0a e. Whereas& no other groups, sainiitter# of other person or persons Us the right tospsak for and on boUXt of the rsloltash+t of the 'loaeyrstaewff Chou C+em=ltr of ChStUrfUld, Ciournty$ Virginia on the question of segrsgati ft of the reose in the public schools. NOW* therefore Be It Rssolvsds By the Residents of the Wagstaff Circle" Commitlof Chestsrfisld '40untya %*Ln la r IUt the decision of the M Court -is to tyre detriment of public edw,*tim in the State of Virginia M4 OR Ism asion of the rights of the citisearas of the 00mmwealth of Virgi a* m That the Zntegation of V s in the public oobsois of V3rgna M''Ud bring about an intelorabU sj$U$jm MW wou]d ire foeXtap to exist betwou the races which have not �wwaslupfwre mod„ (3) That it is opposed to the OPMUen or the attsuo %* operate segregated schools in the Imm � � 044th of 'girBini a a: rdd that it terms terms its atie of efforts to insure the crsatia tisn Of a "grsgated sshool s as provided in the wnsutueian of t'ia ,* N►�• (4) That it believes that thoaie have taken 09 position that it is umbrietian to segregate they races fa w pbulia sahieols hm either been e gulftda >e tIDIaraesde or have misinterpetted the (ohristiAll hsl#glon That the integration of the 910100 In,, the Virginia $uhlli:+oe wah�►�,er` would Hart be to beat lntsst of eit rate and swat a 4 ttoWt to do so would serioaaIr of -toot the indiv" at XUWAUM of both of the raaaar. (b) That it calls upon the 0:-010"Is of the 0th of Virginia to two Bush action as MY be n eswsa y in the, oontinaoati on of a segregated school syetu. (7) Tb&t a copy of this resolarti r; be forwarded to s B. StWIVI Qrrer of �iarrg riey Renorawblaw d* k J re +ttUmr dal at Virginia.. RMe *M17 F. 4rdo Qaited Statso tee Ron,. A. `gillis Roberts"* .toad States Senates Rona J. Vaughan oftryt V.8* 4ft" Of R"w"mtst%we Kan. U*74 D sdo Senate of virginiae Ron* 04riand mbwar mastaft Polio COMmUslom of Xduesata# mon, Bdward * Rudgims Virginia R . u"Pol t„ Virginia ser of Del gates, quid I +d of of tomes . , iCOun a Viniaoia. Respectfully Submitted. L Provident* Rom 'stat`f Ca�tte (Resolutions C atero) 220 highland Ave. Colonial Heights,ia Dec let 1954 Board of Supervisors,Chesterfield County, Attention Mr H.T.Goyne,Chairman Water Committee. Dear vIrr Goyne, May I respectfully suggest that in considering the new water plan that some thought be given to obtaining some revenue frompeople who refuse to bear any cost of installation of water lines, :abut who benefit hugely by their installion.The present policy penelises the original developer,and adds tousands of dollars of value to adjoin- . ing property,from which the county derives pra,,,tieally no return. I can cite instances in wick people who develop property refuse the opportunity to help in the expense of installation,, of lines in a eommunity,and afterwards tap on the lines,at a lower rate,if my information is correct,then the people pay who underwrote the original line.I ca; also point out large acreages where the owner refuses to co-operate,and after lines are installed,which add thousands of dollars of value to the property,then begin 40 development of their property. I do not ask that any consideration be given the original developer.as he presumably makes a profit on the proposition, but that the county should consider trying to derive some revenue from those who have made a huge profit at the county's and others expense. May I suggest that consideration be given to either of the following plans,which should bring the county considerable revenue,with prectieally no expense,and at the same time put the original developer in a faire* competetive position. I am not prepared to say whether either of these plans are legal,but they a certAinly just,and economically sound. Plan A On water 'Lines installed in front of property,that the owners or previous owners have not guaranttd or invested in,that there be added amount of at least 106% to the usual tap fee for every tap installed on such property. Plan B On water lines installed in front of such property,+ghat the owner be required to pay 50% of the costs of installion of the lines in front of his property,prior to connection. In both of the above plans all revenue ob- tained to go to the County water fund,not to the original developer. I would thank you gentlemen to give some sonsideration to some method of obtaining som legal method of obtaining some return from the properties which are greatly enhanced in value,, and a the sate time put the original developer a fairer competetibe position. Respe�rtf 11 f Herbert R Crowder Cope Mr Burnett sauthsi�s Vh5iosia EmeA5encl (3taw., gac. SERVING: PETERSBURG, COLONIAL HEIGHTS, DINWIDDIE F. O. BOX 574 CHESTERFIELD AND PRINCE GEORGE PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA M M That the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield 0ounty will take under consideration at its meeting roomat Chesterfield Courthowe on December'14, 19540 at 11s00 a.m., the rezoning and/or granting of a Use Permit 04 the following properties is the County of Chesterfields 1. In Dale Magisterial District, a parcel of land fronting 100 feet on %,* ".0 and extending sestwardly 588 feet, Said pa reel Baing 400 feet south of Rt.6301 on which a Use Permit to operate a contraororts busineb; '18 requested by MrrR.D.Pettueo 8. In M=chested Magistertal Dietriet, a parcel of land frosting 510 _^es on the west sid6 of'the busines district$ fronting oaRt. #;., and UtOnding westwardly 500 feet, said parcel being 746 feet aarebs the vfttera boundary and is of irregular shape; said parcel b100 beiJW ,500 feet south of its i4terSe+ation with R* 436, to Le rescned rrio% Ag riculture to General Nualmos on do application of the MdUab Truck2no Companye 13. In MancheeW-er Magisterial District# a parcel of land dating 89 feet on Rier.dele road and extending a astwardly 150 fs0%# better known as Lot #l, Block A, in the subdivision of Sollsndale, on which a Use Permit for the operation of a 71Miss business is requested by Mrs. C,W.Worshame 4. In Manchelstar Hagioterial District, a parcel of land fronting approxizately 3604 feet on the wostern boundary of the Itm6uetrial zone west of the Atlantic Coast Une RAilzo ad and extending wostwardly approximately 1400 feet, said parcel being 2800 feet immediately south of Clupton Road and 800 feet immediately north of. Cloy'wat 'icadi to be rezoned from Agriculture to Industrial ,%n an app.uostion of the Atlantic Coact Litt& Railroad Company. 5, In Manchester Magisterial Distriet, a parcel of land fronting on Hathaway Road 220 feet and extending westwardly approximately 350 feet. said parcel being of irregular shape and more specifical3,- described as the southeah half of Lot 6j and all of Inks ^, 8 aid 9, Block F j of Cherokee ?i l is Annex, to be rezoned from Resid4nUal-1 to General Business on an application of the rredurick Realty Corporation* 6s In Matoace. Magisteti.al District, a parcel of land fronting 300 feet on Rtfl602r and extending northwardly 300 feet, said parcel beivS 6600 feet east of Rt•630, to be rezoned front .Agriculture to Gemwal Business on an application of Mr.L.J.Bell. 7., In Midlothian and Manchester Magisterial Distrietat a pm eel of ladd fronting 800 feet onRt.60 and extending northwardly. 500 feet said parcel being 500 feet east ofRt o 678, to be removed from Agriculture to General Business on an application of Mrs. A*Ma,Lynch. All 1?ersor.3 favor{.ng or opposing the granting of these requests ar3 i- ;bc' is a rem* a* the time and place herein stesedo— McW.Burvett"Exacit_'.ve acre'er; Board of Supervisomr n+ t'..ester_^i''A aountyl Vex E,-lAkin M kA h A I FORM 392 CPROLI, 3 • OAST 'c 1 N • �r� ��q'f(ORIOP'P3 Richmond, Virginia w November 10, 1954 Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County Chesterfield Courthouse Virginia Gentlemen: Your petitioner, Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, plans to develop approximately thirty-five (35) acres of land west of the Clopton Yard in Chesterfield County, Virginia, which is owned by the Atlantic Land and Improvement Company, a subsidiary of the Atlantis Coast Line Railroad. It, therefore, petitions your honorable body to zone all of its boar embraced in red lines on the plat designated 02 Virginiawl" dated July 249 1953, for heavy industrial purposes,* Yours very truly.. ATLANTIC COAST LIM RAILROAD COMPAI4T E►_ M. X - M. Le Horton, Superintendent MLH/Ame n M McLean Trucking Company TELEPHONE EXECUTIVE OFFICE, 617 WAUGHTOWN STREET P. O. Sox 4-6341 213 WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA PLEASE REPLY TO DRAWER 9-D RICHMOND. VA. October 22, 1954 Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Board of Supervisors, Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett. - In accordance with your advice to me this morning, I am sending to you herewith our Draft No. 53142 in the amount of $10.00 in conjunction with our application for rezoning of 5,69 acres adjacent to our terminal property on the Petersburg Pike. Thanking you, We are, Sincerely yours, MaEAN TRUCKING COMPANY 4 S. C. Anderson District Manager November 9, 1954 Mr. M.W. burnett Executive Secretar7 Board of `'uper.visors County of Chesterfield Chesterfield Court House Virinia Dear Sir: RE: Rezoning 800 foot front- age on Route 60 near its Junction with Buford Road. I respectfully submit for your consideration and that of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County a request for the rezoning of this subject property from Agricultural to "C-2, General Commercial". I further request that this property, which I own, by more particularly rezoned C-2 within the following metes and bounds: approximately 800 feet fronting the new right-of-way being the northern line of route 60, and running back bebween approximately parallel lines 500 feet. The property on the east of mine is owned b-r Mr. Milton W. Clarke, whose address is Box 125, R.F.D.9, and on the west the adjacent property owner is Mrs. Mary Stargardt, whose address is -box 133, R.F,D.9. Mrs Stargardt owns the property occupied by the "Sunset Drive -In Theatre" under the proprietorship of Mr. Clyde 0. Childress, Box 135-C R.F.D. 9. The entire parcel which I now own comprises approximately 18 acres with approximately 800 feet fronts.-e on the new northern right-of-way line, Route 60. I am requesting, I believe, the same depth off of Route 60 for rezoning as is now enjoyed by the Drive -In Theatre. Please find enclosed my check for $10.00. Yours very truly, Mrs. Anita M.--Ljgch box 132 R.F.D. 9 JOHN H. FOSTER + WILLIAM L. MILLER, JR. Engineer and Surveyor Certified Surveyor .7o,4ter & Adler ENGINEER AND SURVEYORS 316 W. Cary Street Rickntond 20, Virginia Dial 7.4619 Board of Zoning Appeals Chesterfield County,Va. Gentlemen: Oct. 26,1954 On behalf of our clients Frederic Realty Corp. we hereby request that the southern half of Lot 6 and all of Lots 7,8 & 91 Block F9 Plan of Cherokee Hills be rezoned from R-1 Residential to General Business. Hoping this meets with your approval, Respectfully, w William L. Miller Jr. MEMBER: Va. Assn. of Surveyors, Inc. 0 American Congress on Surveying and Mapping 0 Va. Society of Professional Engineers J. A. ANDERSON, COMMISSIONER E. P. BARROW, LAWRENCEVILLE, VA. GED. P. DEHARDI T. GLOUCESTER, VA. BURGESS E. NELSON, MT, JACKSON, VA., S. W. RAWLS, FRANKLIN, VA. HOWARD C. ROGERS, HAMILTON, VA. J. S. WAMPLER, BIG STONE GAP, VA. TUCKERC. WATKINS, JR., SOUTH BOSTON, VA J. F. WYSOR, PULASKI, VA. P. W. SNEAD DISTRICT ENGINEER 60r4M0 ViR DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS RICHMOND 19 December 3, 1954 Mr. M. W. Burnett, Exec. Sec. Chesterfield County Chesterfield C.H., Va. Dear Mr. Burnett: C. S. MULLEN, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER S, CHIEF ENGINEER A. H. PETTIGREW, RIGHT OP WAY ENGINEER R. P. ELLISON, EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT F. A. DAVIS, PURCHASING AGENT C. J. ALLARD, AUDITOR J. P. MILLS, JR., TRAFFIC 8 PLANNING ENGINEER IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO ROUTE NO. PROJECT NO. OFFICE OF DISTRICT ENGINEER PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA RE: Route 36 - Ettri ck Chesterfield County Pt the November Board 114eeting, you gave me a sketch showing the conditions existing on Chesterfield Avenue adjacent to water plii.gs and requested that we try to work out some way to build up the curb to prevent cars from being damaged by striking the fire hydrants. This matter has been taken up with our Central Office and I am advised by Mr. Snead that they do not think it practical to reduce the width of pavement by extending the curb out into the roadway. They feel that the fire hydrants should be moved back a sufficient distance to pre- vent them from being struck. Yours very truly, C. F. Ke lam, Resident Engineer Uy : mlc Io1rri . ,1, 1nNWEALT H- Go J. A. ANDERSON, COMMISSIONER E. P. BARROW, LAWRENCEVILLB, VA. GCO. P. DEHARDIT, GLOUCESTER, VA. BURGESS E. NELSON, MT, JACKSON, VA. S. W. RAWLS, FRANKLIN, VA. HOWARD C. ROGERS, HAMILTON, VA. J. B. WAMPLER, BIG STONE GAP, VA. TUCKER.C. WATKINS, JR., SOUTH BOSTON, VA. J. F. WYSOR, PULASKI, VA. P. W. SNEAD DISTRICT ENGINEER 14 OF 171>r,-IN IA. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS RICHMOND 19 Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Chesterfield Courthouse, Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: C. S. M ULLEN, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER h CHIEF ENGINEER A. H. PETTIGREW, RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEER R. P. ELLISON. EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT F. A. DAVIS, PURCHASING AGENT C. J. ALLARD, AUDITOR J. P. MILLS, JR., TRAFFIC B PLANNING ENGINEER IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO ROUTE NO. 10 RROJKCT NO. Chesterfield County OFFICE OF DISTRICT ENGINEER PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA November 9, 1954 Relative to the resolution passed by your Board dated October 11, 1954, requesting a reduction in the speed limit from 35 MPH to 25 MPH on Route 10, from the W.C.L. of Richmond to McGuire Hospital entrance, wish to advise that I have taken this up with Mr. J. P. Mills, Jr., Traffic and Planning Engineer.,m d he has made a study of this condition. Mr. Mills' report indicate that a reduction in the speed limit between these points is not justifiable at this time. See attached copy of Mr. Mills' report dated November 51, 1954. Very truly yours, Ows P. W. Snead, District Engineer. PWS:S Cy. Mr. C. F. Kellam Form No. az-H TO FROM SUBJECT: lw DEPARTIAW OF HIGHWAYS INTER-DEP.ARTIv DUAL MEMORANDUM *PO P* W* R3aabaearad , Vhvkda j. P. nuns sir. now Requait for ad unto Route_40-_PrOJ. Faroal tlty tat of MANWA U MoOmAre Xsegta►i *U OOVAWY ROOM** u a s to � � l�r, talutaaa+a now. at �IItOaMit�► � am �� of vw � a � of ��eatarr!'iele of Gem ah�V to t Spar+d** arm tO r gas to tba t ► ea tho 8*404 �Qlal. ads mmoti we ar mm"At ""a � ra with tm 8tata PaiSaa tM'" f 1NII flatMkE�1Nlis 1q�$ p"+r OPM ath" ski*pt + 'ter # b u "aft �a o le 63,E of that a m �� 2# of the �wi�l�da IA* or lose. flo" t + U*ra1 d at a s of rate and a��s. Il L to emtou to tb��� Pam tbo, riramlts a bP' ors at c.'. taael tb&t the 351 so skimp to ratter „ ► a�raa►flaLlur withthe MOM""M adjmt their �'�dt of c '�A�a wr tsar rmdera gip,, , aaad a a. aid tberaite ro,F sdYisO the Dc►& rd of ow Richmond, Virginia ovember 25, 1954 Dear h r. Burnet to Due to parking being prohibited on '10odstook Avenue (Belt Boulevard) the alley bet;reen this street and 4-Sth. has to be used by the residents of Woodstock avenue to ?het to and from thier homes, This alle;j has never been graded and is very rough, and badly in need of repairs, especially the entrance at Stockton street. 'To the undersigned residents request that the county take action to improve this situation. Thanking; you for any assistance �-ou can f;ivr in this mattex. Very Trul,r `!ours � P- J- /�o Y, ��� , ,fxAc)NWEALTH- Go J. A. ANDERSON, COMMISSIONER E. P. BARROW, LAWRENCEVILLE, VA. GEO. P. DEHARDIT, GLOUCESTER, VA. BURGESS E. NELSON, MT, JACKSON, VA.. S. W. RAWLS, FRANKLIN, VA. HOWARD C. ROGERS, HAMILTON, VA. J. B. WAMPLER, BIG STONE GAP, VA. TUCKER C. WATKINS, JR., SOUTH BOSTON, VA. J. F. WYSOR, PULASKI, VA. P. W. SNEAD DISTRICT ENGINEER OF1h„_i NIN DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS RICHMOND 19 December 13, 1054 Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Chesterfield C.H., Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: C. 3. MULLEN, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER A. H. PETTIGREW, RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEER R. P. ELLISON, EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT F. A. DAVIS, PURCHASING AGENT C. J. ALLARD, AUDITOR J. P. MILLS, JR., TRAFFIC 6 PLANNING ENGINEER IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO ROUTE NO. PROJECT NO. OFFICE OF DISTRICT ENGINEER PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA RE: 3¢ Road Fund - Winfree Street Extension in. Chester I am attcch_ng herewith a sketch showing the proposed extension of 4infree Street, from the end of Route 1515 0.03 Mi. to Snead Street. The estimated cost of this work to put into condition to become a part of the secondary system is $220,00. This estimate, of course, would mean favorable conditions and not in the dead of winter, as it would be impossible to do the necessary grading and keep traffic moving in bad weather. Yo urs very truly, Kel. a m, Resident EnE7i_neer CFK:m1c qtt. /,I T�6i4 ow"We ---Now* IF k J. A. ANDERSON, COMMISSIONER E. P. BARROW, LAWRENCEVILLE, VA. GEO. P. DEHARDIT, GLO U CESTER, VA. BURGESS E. NELSON, MT, JACKSON, VA.. 8. W. RAWLS, FRANKLI N, VA. HOWARD C. ROGERS, HAMILTON, VA. J. B. WAMPLER, BIG $TONE GAP, VA. TUCKERC. WATKINS, JR., SOUTH BOSTON, VA. J. F. WYSOR, PULASKI, VA. P. W. SNEAD DISTRICT ENGINEER cor4mo, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS RICHMOND 19 December 13, 1954 Mr. M. 14. Burnett, Executive Secretary Chesterfield C.H., Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: C. S. MULLEN, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER A. H. PETTIGREW' RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEER R. P. ELLISO N, EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT F. A. DAVIS, PURCHASING AGENT C. J. ALLARD, AUDITOR J. P. MILLS, JR., TRAFFIC 9 PLANNING ENGINEER IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO ROUTE NO. PROJECT NO. OFFICE OF DISTRICT ENGINEER PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA RE: Resolution dated October 11, 101�4 - Abandonment of Reams Road With further reference to your request, as covered in your reso- lution of October 11, 1954 to abandon that portion of Reams Road taken into the seccnda ry system July 11 1954, and substitute the portion of Bell's Road, from 1641 to the overheat_? bridge. This matter was taken up with Mr.. Crute, today, and he advised that if possible he would like for this section of road to be abandoned under Section 33-76.1.2. If this does not meet with the approval of the Board, the Highway Department will go along with the deletion of mainte- nance on this road. This, of course, will mean that we will Iin ve to have a public hearing.and post, the road prior to the hearing. CFK:mlc Yours very truly, ,4, C. 7 Ke am, Resident Engineer J. A. ANDERSON, COMMISSIONER E. P. BARROW, LAWRENCEVILLE, VA. GEO. P. DEHARDIT. GLOUCESTER, VA. BURGESS E. NELSON, MT, JACKSON, VA.. S. W. RAWLS, FRANKLIN, VA. HOWARD C. ROGERS, HAMILTON, VA. J. B. WAMPLER, BIG STONE GAP, VA. TUCKERC. WATKINS, JR., SOUTH BOSTON, VA. J. F. WYSOR, PULASKI, VA. P. W. SNEAD DISTRICT ENGINEER DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS RICHMOND 19 November 1.2, 1954 C. S. MULLEN, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER A. H. PETTIGREW, RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEER R. P. ELLISON, EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT F. A. DAVIS, PURCHASING AGENT C. J. ALLARD, AUDITOR J. P. MILLS, JR., TRAFFIC . PLANNING ENGINEER IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO ROUTE NO. PROJECT No. OFFICE OF DISTRICT ENGINEER PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA RE: Quail Oaks Subdivision off Route 1 - Chesterfield County 3¢ Road Fund Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Chesterfield County Chesterfield C.H., Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: I am attaching herewith sketch and estimate of cost of bringing Forest Road up to subdivision standards, acceptable to the secondary system. You will note that in order to put this road in shape it is necessary that two lines of pipe be installed, 0,15 mile of road graded and covered with crusher run. This cost is estimated at $500.00 and if the board wishes this work done please let me have resolution covering same. CFK:mlc att. Yours very truly, C. F. Kel m Resident Engineer J. A. ANDERSON, COMMISSIONER E. P. BARROW,-AWRENCEVILLE, VA. GEO. P. DEHARDIT, GLOUCESTER, VA. BURGESS E. NELSON, MT, JACKSON, VA, B. W. RAWLS, FRANKLIN, VA. HOWARD C. ROGERS, HAMILTON, VA. J. B. WAMPLER, BIG STONE GAP, VA. TUCKERC, WATKINS, JR., SOUTH BOSTON, VA. J. F. WYSOR, PULASKI, VA. P. W. SNEAD DISTRICT ENGINEER C)01`4WN: '.C7-atY� DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS RICHMOND 19 November 18, 1954 Mr. M. W. Burnett, Exec. Sec. Chesterfield County Chesterfield C.H., Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: C. 8. MULLEN, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER A. H. PETTIGREW, RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEER R. P. ELLISON, EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT F. A. DAVIS, PURCHASING AGENT C. J. ALLARD, AUDITOR J. P. MILLS, JR., TRAFFIC . PLANNING ENGINEER IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO ROUTE NO. PROJECT NO. OFFICE OF DISTRICT ENGINEER PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA RE: Forest Road in Quail Oaks Subdivision Your memorandum of November 15th has been received and I have gone over the cost of bringing road up to standard again. The notes re- ferred to, by you, on the sketch are explained as follows: The pipe in the road .15 of a mile from Route 1 is necessary as far as maintenance is concerned, if this road is to be taken into the secondary system. Water ponds at this point and we would be unable to maintain the road properly with out it. The pipe near Route 1 is to small and is bent up and would have to be replaced. I am attaching herewith sketch, previously sent you, and I am sorry to advise that the cost cannot be reduced if this is to be built to be taken into the secondary system. Yours very truly, C. F. Kel Resident Engineer CFK:mlc att. . � ...■.. arrw aw .�' .w.. P. olow. iw! "Nob-4100 alter-y 4 wow Vow �;pny VOW 15C — 28A Tire Town, Inc* f-' 28 McLean Trucking Company 27 — n 0 28B — 28C L,R.Goyne — C,4-,-- 29 T.Montague Holland 35 Z*S*SiMPBOU Du Pont hN &I ®R tAj s � y .i x � F CI T -q� %po ct, cz FA lwi wMM. " Aye�pp�nY,�p f i A 2" 1 ii Y e Cla i 7}8 6> h. �R q k Q a,R a n#_ 9K� E v s S V' + E ik F a PS x 9C %W *000 12 Atlantic Coast Line RR* Company 17 34 - 32 - 12A- Ci*r--of—Ri-ch*ond 33 - Stephen Shepperson 36 - Atlantic Land & Improvement Co. c/o A*L*Adamson 58 - Eleanor P. Barton 31 - Fritz Koch 25 - LewisW. Pierce 249- J.J. M. 23 - ;*79McDonald 22 - Margaret MoRes 22A, T-tt-B. 18 Thomas H. Bullock 41 Clarence F. Kennedy 42 Tames L. Denson 43 Richard C. Chamberlain 44 Louis W. Boltz 45 Relmond M,Dixon 46 Fred W. Barnes, Jr. 47 - Alva HoWallace 48 - Ashby T.Worrell, Jr. Gas, m an #-r0 n-at �oc,y VD VV `N IN Q,% \ O O x Z 3� S`� `• 0 �vt AK a� A o � �rQ ► wSoo • -------._......_�...._ C f"1 Sr That the Board of 3upexviboks of Chesterfield County will take under ae't consideration at its mU roomat Chesterfield Courthouse on December 14. 1954t at 11:00 ,eenap 'the **zoning and/or granting of a Use permit on the following properties In 'the. County of Chesterfield: �.. In Dale Magisterial District, a parcel of lend fronting 100 feet cm R'a :.0 and extending eastwardly 028 feet, said pa reel being 100 fe9ti south of Rte638, on which a Use Permit to operate a cuntra3,•crva biaihess is requested by Mr.R.DoPettuse 24 In is La',sst6fi Usaistdr bl District} a parcel of land fronting 5:0 'ee•;•oa tee west, side of thebusities district, fronting oaPt. #:.r and exteiidi4 westwardly 500 Net, said parcel being 746 feet aarose the wgs*ern boundaryy and is of irregular shape; said parcel blso bilbg 500 feet bouth of its intersection with R+o638, to Le rewied fxotl Agriculture to Gaaeral Business on an appl''.catidn of the McLean TrIack2ng Cvmpanyo Jc In Manc;azs•�r-r Meg?saetisl. District' a parcel of land fronting 89 feet on £cichda:•s Y!6&d and extending 9astwarcity 150 feet, better knows. as 74Nt #1, Bijok A, in the subd vision of Hollandale, on which a Lan Perm+v 'for the operation of a ''7.3sties business is requested by Mrs. OX-Ifforshams, 4. Ia Mancans'crr llagi.sterie! District, a parcel of land fronting approlzimate?.y 3600 feet on the wostern boundary of the Industrial zone west of the htlant .e Coast Line Rii!Mad and extending westwardly appro-cur_ately 1400 feet, said parcel being 2800 feet immsdta',elNy south o:* Clupton R^ad and 800 feet, immediately north of C1opuoz, head, to be rezoaod from Agriculture to Induatric! :+n an app lie ,tion of the atl► ntic Coact Line Railroad Comp may. 50 In Manchester Magisterial District, a parcel of land fronting os Ha',,hawa;T Road 220 feet and extending westwardly appr oxinately 330 feet. said parcel being of irregular shape and more spco;ifical:;- dnaXxibed as the southeah hal; of Lot 6= and all of Lots "r E3 wad ^, Block F, of herokew 71-118 Annex, to be razonad iron Rasia6n,'ial—1 to General Business on an application of the reedtrtck Realty Corporation. 6. in MeA+oace Magisterial District, a parcel of land fronting 300 fRet on Rta602g and extending northwardly 300 feet, said parcel beinS 6600 feet east of Rto630, to be rezoned from Agriculture to Gerval Business on an application of Mr X*.T.Bell• 7., In Mi.dlothtau and Manchester Magisterial DAtricts, a parcel of laid fronting 800 feet onRt.60 and extending northwardly, 500 feat sa'..d parcel being 500 feet seat ofRto678t to be resoned from Agriculture to General Business on an application of MrE. A.,UWLYAoh. A2.1 pe ra n^.s f rcr ng or opposing the granting of these requests arc i-vv i :ec' t % ;imr-a- at, the tim,- and place herein stated,, �' J M.W. Burnett ,.Exoc s.;f.ve S�dcra'-ar; Hoard of SupArvl.c.o-^ ni t`•I ester i 3'.3. county, '11r g ui n • `%W AN ORDI14ANCE to provide etc. WHEREAS, by Chapter 594 of the Acts of the General Assem- bly of Virginia, 1954, the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia is authorized to provide for a license tax on mot vehicles; and, WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia held at the Court House of said County on the �� ay of ®�7 'oOC r' , 1954, an Ordinance to provide for a license tax on motor vehicles was introduced and the proposed Ordinance was published once a week for four successive weeks, namely, 3O , Alo ►/. 6 , o% /3 i and /VpV-; 4 , in the Richmond `]'roles Dispatch, a newspaper] of general circul ation in the County of Chesterfield; copies of said Ordinance having been posed at the front door of the Court House of said County and at each Fost Office in the County, by which all persons affected by said Ordinance were notified to appea on December 14, 1954 at 11:30 A.M. at the meeting room of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia at Chesterfield Court House, to present their views in respect thereto. NOW, THEREFORE, etc.: M M �Pfiwb-t?le Word or Supervisors or Meater e t L Ordinance to provide for a license tax on Motor Vehicles and punishment for failure to comply with some, whish BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AS FOLD"JS: MOTOR VEHICLEd - Every motor vehicle and trailer operated on the streets, highways or roads within Chesterfield County in business or for the private use or benefit of the owner„ shall be subject to a license tax as provided herein. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be construed to require the payment of a license tax on vehicles exclusively employed in transporting fuel, provisions# manure or other things to be used only at tho ownerts farm or dwelling. to ,automobiles - On each and every automobile there shall be a tax of #5.00 and on each and every motorcycle, a tnx of 2.00 . This shall not be required of any person who does not actually reside in Chesterfield County and who does not use their automobile in Chesterfield County in the conduct of their business, occupation or pfofession* The word "rewide" as used in this section shall be construed to mean " to have a pLace of abode in Chesterfield County" irrespective of the intention of any person to return to some residence outside of Chesterfield County a* some future timer 2• Truffks, trailers, etc. - (a) Every truck, trailer, semi- trailer and auto wagon not designed and used for the transportation of passengers, operated on the streets, highways, and roads within Chester- field County, shall be licensed. Each truck and auto wagon not designed and used for the transportation or passengers up to one and ono -half Go'1;: ti'j factory r�ccc' s �ci� shall a t_,x of 5.00 and each truck p ty pay _.._ _ ._ M M -2- and auto -wagon not designed and used for the transportation of passengers of one and one-half (1j) tons rated capacity or over, shall pay a tax of 010_ -00 . Each trailer and semi -trailer shall -pay a tax of O10�, except trailers of less than 1000 pounds of gross weight shall pay a tax of $'240. (b) In the case of a combination of a tractor -truck and trailer or semi -trailer, each vehicle cOrstituting a part of such combination shall be licensed as a s epar Ete vehicle. and separate license plates shall be issued therefor, (c) The County license tax for the license plates to be paid by the owner of any motor vehicles, trailer or semi-trailorl upon which well drilling machinery is attached and which is permanently used solely for transporting such machinery shall be 10*009 3. License Tax Year - Mie license tax year shall commence on the first day of April and shall expire on the thirty-first day of march of :each year. 4. Proration - Only one-half of the license tax prescribed by this Ordinance shall be assessed and collected whenever any such license tax first becomes assessable during the period beginning on the first day of October in any year,, rand ending on the fifteenth day of January in the same license tax year; and only one-third of such license tax shall be assessed and collected whenever any such license tax first becomes assessable after the fifteenth day of January in the some license tax year, Each license issued upon the payment of the licecsa tax thereon shall expire at the end of the license tax ye,,z in v.,hi .h the some is issuodo 5. Refunds or Unused Motor Vehicle License Taxes - Every person holding a current motor vehicle license tin or tag and disposing of the vehicle for which it was issued, and not purchasing another vehicle of the some class for tax purposes* shell be entitled to a refund of the unwed portion of the license tax paid by him upon a st=onder, on or before the thirtieth day of September of the then current license tax year* of the county license tin or t^g and the production of a certificate from the state motor vehicle commissioner or other proper State Officer: that the Stntc licti.nse plates and reg- istration certificates have been surrendered. Such refund shall be one-half of the license ttit paid. If the surrender of the County tin or tag of the State certificate are made on or after the first day of October and on or before the fifteenth day of January of tho.then current license tax year, there shall be a similar refund of one-third of the license tax paid. Such a refund shall be made by the Treasurer of the County from,the treasury of Chesterfield County 6. Issuing License Tags - Any person coming under the provisions of this Ordinance shall Dike application for license upon forms proscribed by the Treasurer of Chesterfield County and at such places as he may designate and upon payment of required tax shall be issued as evidence, tins or tags shall be attached to the rear of the vehicle so licensed so as to be readable in a manner similar to the State license tags. Failure to display tins or tags shall be considered as violation even though the license tax has been paid. It shall bo unlawful. for any person to whom a tin or tag is issued upon the ]p:)ymcnt of any license tax prescribed in this Ordinencet to give* loan, rent, sollz assign, or transfer such tin or tag to another or to othorwirc ??ormit onothe to nsj isi a:iy yac-L aor such tin or tag* durinC, the M M —4— the same is issued. ?,D Lost Tags — A duplicate plate shall be issued upon affidavit of the applicant that the original tag has been Lost,. at a cost of fi f-ey coats e Be Exemption — Nothing in this Ordinance shrill be consturod to require a license tax of a person, firm or corporation exempted under provisions of the State Statute* 9a P nalt;r — Eve perso w o vio to any p vis on f th Or n<^ne s 11 be g t of a sd ,oanor a upon n ict;o hereof shall e punish d y a fine f not les than Fi , oliars e00),, more th Five un red Do or ('Q"500 00), oeo ra e b ore t ial T tice o o Count pon a s ons issue the sterfie d ounty olive D Aar eat. 10s Effective Date — This ordinance shall become and be in full force and effect on April li 1955 and thereafter* All persons favoring or opposing the passage of this Ordinance are requested to appear at the time and place herein stated* M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. 9• Penalty - :every person who violates any provision of this Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction j thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not less than rive Dollars ! (45.00) nor mole than Five Hundred Dollars ( 500.00), and trial of I all violators of this Ordinance shall be enforced by proceeding be -I fore the Trial Justice Court of Chesterfield County in the manner and witl. like right of appeal as is provided in misdemeanor cases, I and the Police of Chesterfield County are hereby authorized to issu a summons in writing to violators of this Ordinance for their appe+ ance before said Court; and upon the service of said summons, the person charged with the offense shall give his written promise to j appear at the time and place designated in said summons. Every I person who willfully violates his written promise to appear shall b guilty of a violation of this ordinance which shall be in addition 'I to the charge upon which he was originally summonsed. ,��d ��s �� �� ;� !� i i � i � � i �/ / / / � i � �, / i /i i �' %� ' i � � / � / `� i f /` I / � i � � � � � / ,. ,�/ ,, � -� � � � �� i � � � � � � ,� / i ,, � � ' i i � � � �,���� � �� � �� f� � �� �� � �� / � � / ' � / i i f �i � � � � � � ' � s �• / / / / /. ` I � .� � � � � � i �� <,- � �, � � . / � / / I �� i / / / = / 1 � � ,= i � / iJ � � / � ,� ,� / / �� z. M That the Board of Supervisors of Chestetfield County will take under consideration at its meeting room at Chesterfield Courthouse on December 14, 1954, at 11430 a-om4, the passage of an Ordinance to provide for a license tax on Motor Vehicles and punishment for failure to comply with same, which is the following Ordinance: RE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPMVISORS OF CMTERF EM COUNTY AS iroLLOt"1$: MOTOR VEHICLES - Every motor vehicle and trailer operated on the streets, highways or roads within Chesterfield County in business or for the private use or benefit of the owner, shall be subject to a license tax as provided heroine Nothing in this Ord nanco-shall be construed to require the payment of a license tax on vehicles exclusively employed in transporting fuel, provisions# manure or other things to be used only at the owneros fans or dwelling. to ,automobiles - On each and every automobile there shall be a tax of $5.00 and on each and every motoreycie, a tax of .00 This shall not be required of any person who does not actually reside in Chesterfield County and who does not use their automobile in Chesterfield County in the conduct of their business, occupation or pfofession. The word "revide" as used in this section shall be construed to mean " to have a place of abode in Chesterfield County" irrespective of the intention of any person to return to some residence outside of Chesterfield County arc some future time. 2s Trueks, trailers, ate. (a) Every truck, trailers semi- trailer and auto -wagon not. designed and used for the transportation of passengers, operated on the streets# highways, and roads within Chester- field County, shall be liteasod• Each truck and auto -wagon not designed and used for the transportation or passengers up to one and one-half tons �' ) factory, rated capacity shall pay a tax of 5.00 _ and each truck -2- and auto -wagon not designed and usod for the transportation of passengers of one and one-half (1*) tons noted capacity or over, shall pay a tax of $10, .00 . Each trailer and semi -trailer shall pay a tax of $10,�00-, except trailers of less than 1000 pounds of gross weight shall pay a tax of $aa00-4 (b) In the case of a combination of a tractor -#ruck and trailer or semi -trailer, each vehicle constituting a part of such combination shall be licensed as a s *par tte vehicle, and separate license plates shall be issued therefor # (,,e) The County license tax for the license plates to be paid by the owner of any motor vehicles, trailer or semi-trailerp upon which well drilling machinery is attached and which is permanently used solsly for transporting such machinery shall be 010j.00s 3, License Tax Yenr - The license tax year shall commence on the first day of April and shall expire on the thirty-first day of March of :each year. 4. Proration - Only one-half of the license tax prescribed by this Ordinance shall be assessed and collected whenever any such license tax first becomes assessable during the period be#inning on the first day of October in any year, and ending on the fiftoenth day of January in the same license tax year; and only one-third of such license tax shall be assessed and collected whenever any such license tax first becomes assessable after the fifteenth day of January in the same license tax year* Each license issued upon the payment of the li3onso ta:. thereon shall expire at the end of the license tax ye:,r i.n Trhi :h the same is issued, r3- 5. Refunds or Unused Motor Vehicle License Taxes - Every person holding a current motor vehicle license tin or tag and disposing of the vehicle for which it was issued, and not purchasing another vehicle of the same class for tax purposes* shall be entitled to a refund of the unwed portion of the license tax paid by him upon a svirronder, on or before the thirtieth day of September of the then f,: current license tax year# of the county license tin or t^g and the production of a certificate from the stnto motor vehicle commissioner or other proper State Officer, that the Stato license plates and reg- istration certificates have been surrendered. Such refund shall be ono -half of the license tat paid. If the surrender of the County tin or tag of the State certificate are made on or after the first day of October and on or before the fifteenth day of January of th:;.then current license tax year, there shall be a siimilnr'xnfund of one-third of the license tax pnid. Such a refund shall be made by the Treasurer of the County from the treasury of Chesterfield County. 6. Issuing License Tags Any person coming under the provisions of this Ordinance shall take application for license upon forms prescribed by the Treasurer of Chesterfield County end of such places as he may designate and upon payment of required tax shall be issued as evidence, tins or tags shall be attached to the rear of the vehicle so licensed so as to be readable in a manner similar to the State license tags. Failure to display tins or tags shall be considered as violation evon though the license tax has been paid. It shall be anlawfu], for any parson to whom a tin or tag is issued upon the jpoymcnt of and* license tax prescribed in this Ordiu mcn* to give* loans rent, scl:L;. ussiFr., or transfer such tin or tag to another or to othorwir c permit c.no tan' t-c us Cn an;- .inarai ,y, such tin or tg,& durinC t"o 7 119 L —4• the some is issued, 7s Lost Tags A A duplicate Plate shall be issued up014 affidavit of the applicant that the original tag has been lost,, at a cost of fifty cents, 8. Exemption — Nothing in this Ordinance shall be constured to require a license tax of a parson, firm or corporation exempted under provisions of the State Statute, 90 Penalty .- Evory person who violates any provision of this Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not less than Five Dollars (05*00). nor more than Five Hundred Dollars (w500o00), recoverable before the Trial Justice of the County, upon a summons issued by the Chesterfield County Police Department, 10, Effective Dote — This ordinance shall become and be in full force and effect on April 1. 1955 and thereafter► All persons favoring or opposing the passage of this Ordinance are requested to appear at the time and place herein stated* Vo W, Burnett, Executive Secretary Hoard of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. JJP Awc �..I.2 %later. o� Gs�ce.� o� �a.,..--� s� �..:w� � �,...-.%Fi. �•v.�w i NOY RECEIVED of 9110!.��Oks to+,0TY Q- Midlothian Volunteer Fire Department MIDLOTHIAN, VIRGINIA November 16, 19 4 Boar(', of Suoervi sons of ChP r'.erfield County, Cher' erfi.eld. Court House, Viruinia. Gentl ern en s The Midlothian Volunteer Fire Dex)?.rtrient has gone on recor(' officially as ob-osing the nronosec' new County auto license tax. We urge that you defeat the bill when it comes be,'ore the Board of Supervisors for final reading lee, 14. As citizens of Chesterfield. County, the members of tine Departrne ,.t are opposed to the bill as being unjust unnecessary and. inequitable. As volunteer f_�_rernen, we object to the fact that the co-n-f-iroversi.al license tax bill would take away from: the "ire cepartme.nts of the county their only regular source of revenues The voluntary sale of "local" auto taus -t $1 epch. We as,- your consi6er-;lion of our vi.e?�. r,n(' hone `; e bill will not becorite a I�7..w. Resrectf ll.y your^t C.�at es P:^.c_ cecret^ry NoveabeR Ito M4 Mr. 04:1 les p`"kard, Seorstary VidlotMeA Yalmatoer Hire Department xidlothiaa, Virginia Dear My* Peekard i Your letter Of Novaaber ]bthi will be read during the dieousslos of the Wow*d anto tax at the Hoard of eupervisorsts meeting ca Dooaxber loth at approximately 11130 a.m. WB m Tours very truly, No WOBurleett mcesuutit►e es cret ar y WAGSTAFF CIRCLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY NUIEER 10 NOV RECEIV Ei.:. I WEWIRS ,�2 lc� SO cw _..�� Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Chesterfield Court House Chesterfield, Virginia Attention; M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Gentlemen: November 17, 1954 As to the business now before the Board pertaining to the proposed 45.00 assessment per automobile in the county, it is my duty as President to express the views of this department on this subject, by quoting below action taken at the regular monthly meeting of October 4, 1954. This matter was brought up and thoroughly discussed at which time motion was made and seconded and the following quotation is taken from the minutes of this department. "That this department go on record as opposing any county license tax on automobiles." The foregoing was carried by unanimous vote. In summing up the discussion, the primary reason for this opposition is that the sale of automobile tags by the individual fire depart- ments in their local communities was the main source of revenue for operational cost not supplied by the county. Furthermore, this means that where a resident has been purchasing the fire department individual tags means that each resident must still extend the same support to the department in order for the department to operate in a beneficial way to the people in its community, and still be susceptible to the county for the proposed $5.00 tax. It will be greatly appreciated if you will read this letter at the next officially -convened meeting of the Board in order that this record will be made upon the minutes of that august body. LTV1/dmb Y s very L. M. iELLYN President 1- 93 NOVMbet 1t$ 1954 Mr,L*Mo Lla"llynt President wagetef! al"Is Yolpnteer lire Department t3heaterfisld County Riohrlol�, Yiargiaia Dear Mr. Ll webs: 8soeipt is here noted of your letter dated Novo 19the "solved on the 19th of November# 1954* AS rregwwt*d your latter will be road during the dieomlofon, of the proposed auto tags an DooeAber 141k at approximately 1100 in the momIng. Tour$ Teary triart X* 9'4areo tt MWBIM hrceoutly* Seabretax7 GEORGE L. MUNN, COMMANDER H. W. ZEHMER, IST VICE -COMMANDER F. R. BARRETT, 2ND VICE -COMMANDER JACOB V. BOWEN, ADJUTANT W. T. CHAPMAN, FINANCE OFFICER Pe �zaeri an'X.egt`�zz�%d B ROA D W EL L-FA R RA R-W YATT POST 354 BON AIR, VIRGINIA TO: CIIES`i &&IELD COUNTY BGA :D OF SUPI;MSO .S CHARLES H. PORTER. SERVICE OFFICER H. A. WILLIAMS, CHAPLAIN JOHN R. ANDERSON, SERGEANT AT ARMS W. T. CHAPMAN, HISTORIAN H. G. TROLLINGER, PUBLICITY OFFICER '& ' EAS,with the constand and ever increasing taxes levied against property both real and personal, and WHEREAS, due to the great migration of indus"ries and residents to Chesterfield County in the past decade, which have materially increased the tax revenues, and arHLIII_'OiS, the imposition of an additional license tax on passenger automobiles and trucks would be burdensome to the citizens and taxpayers of this county, Tlal2ll ORE, BE !T ' :ESGLVED that we, the members of Post 354 of the American Legion in our regular monthly meeting held October &, 1954, unanimously oppose the levying of any additional tax on passenger automobiles or trucks. By order of the Post Commander, American Legion Post 354. Signed /✓•/`• G. Leonard Munn, Commander ,1 J. V. Bowen, Adjutant ORDINANCE NO. Approved by the Board of Supervisors AN ORDINANCE prohibiting the firing and discharge of firearms in heavily populated areas of Chesterfield County. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY a follows : That it shall be unlawful for any person to fire or dis- charge any pistol, rifle, shot gun, or firearm of any kind or nature except in the defense of his person, family, or property in the boundaries of: aries: 1. Ettrick Sanitary District 2. That area of land enclosed within the following bound- A. Beginning at a point on the South line of the James River where the transmission line of the Virginia Electric and Pow Company crosses said river; thence running along said transmission line in a southerly direction to a point where it intersects Route 147; thence running along Route 147 in a westerly direction to the West line of Brookwood Road, thence run in along the 'Wrest line of� Brookwood Road iaia ; thence running along the right of way line of the said Railroad to a point where Route 1718 crosses said Railroad; thence along the West line of Route 1718 in a southwesterly direction to the West lim of Chatsworth Street; thence along the West line of Chatsworth Street and an extension thereof to the South line of Trevillian Road; thence along the South line of Trevillian road in an Easterly direction to the 'dest line of Buford 'Road; thence running along the West line of Buford Road to U. S. Route 60; thence along the North line of U. S. Route 60 in a Road; thence running along the West line of Turner Road in a souther�l direction to the Old Goode's Bridge Road; thence running along the I !old Goode's Bridge Road in an easterly direction to the Viest line of Pocosham Creek; thence along said Creek to the South line of Falling; I i ;Creek; thence along the South line of Falling Creek in an easterly ;direction to the West right of way line of the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad; thence along the West right of way line of the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad in a southeasterly direction to the South line OF i 1Kingsland Creek; thence along the South line of Kingsland Creek in 1 an easterly direction to the Last right of way line of the Seaboard Air Line Railroad; thence along the Fast right of way line of the ',Seaboard Air Line Railroad in a northerly direction to the South lin� Iof Falling Creek; thence along the South line of Falling Creek to th� West or South line of the James rover; thence along said River in a I northerly direction to the corporate limits of the City of Richmond; i thence along the corporate limits of the City of Richmond in a north- jwesterly direction to the South line of the James river; thence along the South line of the James River in a westerly direction to the i point of beginning. 1 B. Beginning at a point where the spur line of the Sea- board Air Line Railroad leading to Hopewell intersects the main line; of the Seaboard Air Line Railroad; thence running along said spur ! line of the Seaboard Air Line Railroad in a southerly direction to i Proctors Creek; thence up Proctors Creek in an easterly direction toj the West right of way line of the Seaboard Air Line Railroad; thence along the said 'vest right of way line of the Seaboard Air Line Rail road in a northerly direction to the point and place of beginning. , C. Beginning at a point where the Hundred Road or State w thence along the South line of Shop Street in an easterly direction to a point where it intersects with the West line of Windsor Street] thence along the West line of Windsor Street in a southerly direct- ion to the South line of Bruce Street; thence running along the Sou - line of Bruce Street in an easterly direction to the South line of Buckingham Street; thence along the South line of Buckingham Street to the West right of way line of Harrowgate Road or State Route No. 144; thence along the west right of way line of Harrowgate Road or State Route No. 144 to the South line of Fairfax Street; thence along the South line of Fairfax Street in an easterly direction to the East line of South Chester Road; thence along the South Chester Road in a northerly direction to the South line of Curtis Street; thence along the South line of Curtis Street to the West line of the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad right of way; thence along the west!, line of the said Atlantic Coast Line Railroad right of way in a southwesterly direction to the South line of Snead Street; thence I (along the South line of Snead Street in a northerly direction to thell ,East line of Petersburg Street; thence along the East line of F etersjI burg Street to the South line of Curtis Street; thence along the I' h South line of Curtis Street in an easterly direction to State Route IjNo. 10; thence along State Route No. 10 in a westerly direction to i .the old Centralia Road; thence along the old Centralia Road in a 11northerly direction to the north line of Wood Dale Road; thence along �I the North line of Wood Dale Road in a westerly direction to State I' ('Route No. 144; thence along the West line of State Route No. 144 in � !northerly direction to the Idest right of way line of the Seaboard Air;' '.Line Rail roa,d;Theace along the rJest right of way line of the Sea- ilboard Air Line Railroad in a southerly direction th the point and 05 eld County. This Ordinance shall be in its passage by the Board of County Super - as provided by law. �re 14 ec�S L. k, ,,�i a O✓�✓ s[�� ol + / f/. Ca��1 �fCrJCrsc ijirl�u �e Y1 Vl dp�jhS o C'�vnea/ 1- Totih ^ercellvj (Jr �- 4 ;ft J C /r OFFICE OF �fttl,t affiCCta`L ARCHITECT MEMBER AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS 206 EAST CARY ST. 0 TELEPHONE 2.0171 RICHMOND 19, VIRGINIA 8 December 1954 ASSOCIATES ROBERT H. CLARK STUART A. TAYLOR A. H. HAASE Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County Chesterfield Court House, Virginia Attention: Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Gentlemen: This office would be pleased to continue its professional services for the addition to the Health Building to house the School Board offices at the same percentage fee as agreed upon in the original contract. It came as quite a surprise that the County Commonwealth's Attorney had ruled that the original contract did not cover these services, for it was our understanding in the beginning that the wing units of the overall structure were to be constructed at a later date and the overall preliminary planning and design for the entire structure was carried through and submitted to the Board for approval in December 1953. Due to a rather drasticchange in our personnel during the course of preparation of the final drawings and specifica— tions, there have been several instances where items have been overlooked or in error. We are frank to admit these and have, in each case worked out satisfactory corrections therefor without basic detriment to the structure or to the Owner. We can only assure you that our organization is a stable one and that there shall be no re —occurrence of such oversights. Since our relationship to date has been most amicable and since we feel that the to —be —completed building is a real asset to the County properties, particularly in value, we trust that you will see fit to continue our present con— tractual relationship. Thanking you for your cooperation in this matter, I remain, Very truly yours, E. Tucker Carlton, A.I.A. • RHC:agt MEMBER AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARECTS In H. CARL MESSERSCHMIDT ARCHITECT 1105 MUTUAL BUILDING RICHMOND 19, VA. December 6, 1954 County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia. Gentlemen: Attention: Mr. M.W. Burnett Executive Secretary In reply to your letter of December 2, 1954, I would be pleased at the opportunity of serving you as architect for the proposed addition to your Health Building. My fee for the above is six„Cpercent of the cost of construction, which fee covers Preliminary Studies and Consultation, Final Plans,and Specifications, Approval of Contractor's Vouchers, and Supervision of the work. Hoping to hear from you, I beg to remain, Yours very �ttruly, H.Carl Messef�schmidt HCM/mtt lkw "AI/O B E N R. JOHNS, J R. o4c4ilect • Room 409 Telephone 3-8367 T H E VIRGINIA BUILDING ONE NORTH FIFTH STREET RICHMOND 19, VIRGINIA DECEMBER 6, 1954 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA ATTENTION: MR. M. W. BURNETT, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY GENTLEMEN: I APPRECIATE THE COURTSEY OF OFFERING ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPRESS MY DESIRES RELATIVE TO PERFORMING ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR YOUR PROPOSED BUILDING WHICH IS TO HOUSE THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES OF THE SCHOOL BOARD. YOU MAY RECALL THAT THE PERSONNEL OF MY OFFICE HAVE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME FULLY FAMILIAR WITH YOUR PROJECTED BUILDING PROGRAM. THE INDIVIDUAL REQUIREMENTS OF EACH DEPARTMENT IS THOROUGHLY UNDERSTOOD. WITH THIS ESSENTIAL BACKGROUND AS AN ASSET TO OUR ORGANIZATION, I AM VERY MUCH INTERESTED IN OFFERING OUR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD. THE WORKING DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS COULD BE COMMENCED IMMEDIATELY, AND BARRING UNFORSEEN DELAYS FOR APPROVALS AND COORDINATIONS, COULD BE COMPLETED FOR BIDDING WITHIN FOUR WEEKS. THE FEE FOR COMPLETE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES WOULD BE SIX PERCENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION COSTS. ....gonna IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NECESSARY OR AN INSPECTION OF MY FACILITIES IS DESIRED, ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE AT YOUR CONVENIENCE. VERY SINCERELY,...YOURS, BEN R. JO S, JR. ARCHITECT M J. AMHLHR JOHNSTON M. CARY JOHNSTON WM. F. ADxxxsoN A. Rosa AxoaLL KENNETR R. AvasT JAMEs R.BECE BERNARD E. Cooras CARNEAL AND JOHWSTON ARCHITECTS-EwoxxEERs loon ATLANTIC LIFIfl BIIILDIRD RICHMDND 19, VIRGI[WXA December 6th, 1954 Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: WILLIAM L. JINETNs RICHARD L. MAYS, JR. E. TROMAs NxcaoLs ELMO L. PEAamAN SARRAD N. FILIOIAN Roscox E.PUCKETT R WxLHEaT RASMUSSEN JOHN RoasaTs. JR. We are pleased to reply to yours of December 2nd, 1954. 1. We are interested in the project. 2. Our schedule of charges is 6% on the cost of construction and 10% on the cost of mechanical and electrical. We use the Standard Form of Agreement between Owner and Architect, copy of which is herevtith enclosed. 3. Some years ago we did considerable work for the County of Chesterfield with very happy relations, and obviously would be pleased to renew the association. We have a broad experience in office buildings which we would be pleased to go over with you if you will grant us an interview. 4. May we suggest that you select your architect after visiting his office and looking over the class and character of his past work. We expect the schedule of charges of the more competent architects would vary little, but there may be a variance in the type of work handled. Awaiting your command, JAJ : jv Very truly yours, CARNEAL AND JOHNSTON By THE STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ARCHITECT ISSUED BY THE AMRICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS FOR USE WHAM' A PERCENTAGE OF THE COST OF THE WORK FORMS THE DAUB OF PATMENT, AND ENGINEERS' FEES ARE INCLUDED IN THE ARCHITECT's FEE. mxTH mmoN- mP7RIGHT 1948-1951 B7 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARmMcrs, WASsivamN, IL C_ THISAGREEMENT made the.............................................. day of..............................in the year Nineteen Hundred and .......................... _.__-_..._. by and between ...... County of Chesterfield, Virginia............................... .... ............................................................. .......__......hereinafter called the Owner, and J. Ambler Johnston and M. Cary Johnston trading as CARNEAL ......................................................................._...................--------............----...........------.........---- AND JOHNSTON ._.hereinafter called the Architect, WITNESSETH, that whereas the Owner intends to erect..an office building annex to the Chesterfield County Health Building ......................................................---............_.._.----._..............--------._......._.--------...------............_ .... _............. ............................................•---....-----........._........, hereinafter called the Work, NOW, THEREFORE, the Owner and the Architect, for the considerations hereinafter named, agree as follows: The Architect agrees to perform, for the above -named Work, professional serv- ices as hereinafter set forth. The Owner agrees to pay the Architect for such services a fee xk! sed._on a_.. per cent of the cost of the Work, with other payments and reimbursements as herein- after provided, the said percentage being hereinafter called the Basic Rate. on costs other than mechanical and electrical. .. _....-----........._.......... a, ..................................................•---...---...........---....---......................_........... 10% on mechanical and electrical. . ............................................. , ................................................ 'q o9 .................................»......................................................................... ~ v QN 1�7 C 0 v -* Form B--102 The parties hereto further agree to the following and in proportion to the amount of service ren-' be made conditions: 1. The Architect's Services. —The Architect's dered by the Architect, payments shall until the 'aggregate of all payments wade on ac- . professional services consist of the necessary con- count of the fee under this Article, but not in- eluding any covered by the provisions of Article 4, ferences, the preparation of preliminary studies, working drawings, specifications, large scale and shall be a sum equal to the rate or rates of mm- full size detail drawings, for architectural, struc- mission arising from this agreement, computed upon;; tural, plumbing, hearing, electrical, and other work; assistance in the drafting of the final cost of the Work. Payments to the Architect, other than those on mechanical forms of proposals and contracts; the issuance of his fee, fall due from time to time as his work is certificates of payment; the keeping of accounts, the administration of the business and done or as costs are incurred. No deductions shall be made from the Archi- general supervision of the Work. test's fee on account of penalty, liquidated dam``- 2. Reimbursements. The Owner is to reim- &M or other sums withheld from payments to burse the Architect the costs of transportation and contractors. 6. Information furnished by Owner. The living incurred by him and his assistants while traveling in discharge of duties connected with the Owner shall, so far as the work under this agreement Work, the cost of all reproductions of drawings, may require, furnish the Architect with the following the cost of any special conitittants other .thw r normal plumbing, heating, electrical, and other Wormation: A 'twawpltte ' and accurate survey of the building site, giving the grades and lines of mechanical work, and other disbursements on his streets, pavements, and adjoining properties; the rights restrictions, easements, boundaries, and accountapproved by the Owner..... 3. Separate Contracts. —The Basic Rate ap- contours of the building site, and full information plies to work let under a single contract. For any as to sewer, water, gas ,and electrical service. The Owner is to pay for borings or test pits and for portions of the Work ltt' under separate contracts, on account of extra service thereby required, the chemical, mesh . anical, or other tests. when ne- rate shall be four per cent greater; and if substan, tially all the Work is so let the higher rate shall gtnred. " ` The Owner shall provide all legal advice and apply to the entire Work; but there shall be no services required for the operation, such increase on the plumbing, heating, electrical 2. Supervision of the Work. —The Architect and other mechanical work or on any contracts will endeavor by general supervision to guard the in 'connection with which the Owner reimburses Owner against defects and deficiencies in the work special consultants' fees to the Architect, or for of contractors, but he does not guarantee the per - articles not designed by the Architect but pur- ..-formance of their contracts. Tbit general ::Super - chased under his direction. vision of the Architect is to be distinguished from 4. Extra Services and Special Cases. —If the the continuous on -site inspection of a clerk -of -the. Architect is caused extra drafting or other expense due to changes ordered by the Owner, or due to works. When authorized by the Owner, a clerk -of -the. the delinquency or insolvency of the Owner or works acceptable to both Owner and Architect Contractor, or as a result of damage by fire, he shall be equitably paid for such extra expense and shall be engaged by the Architect at a salary satisfactory to the Owner and paid by the Owner, ` the service involved. upon presentation of the Architect's monthly Work let on any cost-plus basis shall be the statements. A subject of a special charge in accord with the g, preliminary Estimates. --When requested special service required, to do so the Architect will furnish preliminary es.. ". If any work designed or specified by the Archi- timates the cost of the Work, but he does not test is abandoned or suspended', in whole or in .on guarantee such estimates. , part, the Architect is to be paid for the service 9. Definition of the Cost of the Work. — rendered on account of it. The cost of the Work, as herein referred to, means S. Payments. —Payments to the Architect on the cost to the Owner, but such cost shall not in - account of his fee shall be made as follows, subject elude any Architect's or Special Consultants' fees to the provisions of Article 4: or reimbursements or the cast of a clerk -of -the- v Upon completion of the preliminary studies, a , ,Works. sum equal to 25% of the basic rate computed upon When labor or material is furnished by the a reasonable estimated cost. Owner below-its.market cost the .cost of the work . During the period' of preparation 'of specific& shall be computed upon such market cost. dons and general working drawings monthly pay- ments aggregating at the completion thereof a sum 10. Ownership of Doc and specifications as instruments of service are the sufficient to increase payments to 75% of the rate of commission arising from this agreement, property of the Architect whether the work for or rates computed upon a reasonable cost estimated on such whichthey are made be executed or not, and are not be used on other work except by agreement completed specifications and drawings, or if bids have been received, then computed upon the lowest with the Architect. bona fide bid or bids. 11. Successors and Assignments. --The From time to time during the execution of work Owner and the Architect, each binds himself, his form B---102 partners, successors, legal representatives, and assigns in this agreement w#thout the written consent of to the other party to this agreement, and to the ' the other. partners, successors, legal representatives and assigns 12. Arbitration All questions in dispute of such other party in respect of all covenants of under this agreement shall be submitted to arbitra- this agreement. tion at the choice of either party, in accordance with the provisions, then obtaining, of the Standard Form Except as above, neither the Owner nor the of Arbitration Procedure of the American Institute Architect shall assign, sublet or transfer his interest of Architects. The Owner and the Architect hereby agree to the full performance of the cove- nants contained herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF they have executed this agreement, the day and year first above written. Architect............................................................................... cm MARCELLUS WRIGHT & SON MARCELLUS E. WRIGHT F. A. I. A. A R C H I T E C T S MARCELLUS WRIGHT, JR. A. I. A. ERNEST R. GILBERT A. 1. A. MEMBERS AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS ASSOCIATE CROZET HOUSE 100 EAST MAIN STREET RICHMOND 19, VIRGINIA TELEPHONES 2-1611 2-1612 2-3275 10 DECEMBER 1954 MR. M. W. BURNETT EXECUTIVE SECRETARY COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA DEAR MR. BURNETT: R. N. ANDERSON, JR. A. I. A. J. M. MCINTOSH, JR. R. A. STAFF ARCHITECTS BERTRAM B. BROWN JAMES E. FRANCIS JOSEPH N. LADD BETH B. NICKELS WAVERLY A. COX FRANK S. NOEL PROJECT MANAGERS WE ARE GRATEFUL FOR YOUR LETTER OF DECEMBER 2 INFORMING US OF THE PROPOSAL OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO ADD TO THE HEALTH BUILDING. WE HAVE LONG WISHED FOR AN OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AND WOULD BE VERY MUCH INTERESTED IN THE PROJECT. OUR FIRM HAS ACCOMPLISHED OUTSTANDING WORK THROUGHOUT THE STATE OVER A PERIOD OF 42 YEARS AND IS PRESENTLY STAFFED WITH A FINE COMBINATION OF PROGRESSIVE TALENT AND MATURE EXPERIENCE. THE ATTACHED BROCHURE WILL MORE FULLY OUTLINE OUR RECORD OF WORKS. ON THE MATTER OF NECESSARY CHARGES, WE HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED ANY PROBLEM. IN COMMON WITH OTHER REPUTABLE PRACTITIONERS, WE FEEL THAT A CLIENT SHOULD NEVER BE CHARGED ANY MORE THAN THE WORK IS WORTH AND THAT HE SHOULD BE FULLY INFORMED AS TO THE EXTENT OF THE SERVICE TO BE EXPECTED. THE EXPERIENCE OF ARCHITECTS OVER THE YEARS HAS INDICATED THAT FULL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES CANNOT BE ADEQUATELY RENDERED FOR LESS THAN 6% ON THE AVERAGE NEW BUILDING OR 10% ON ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS. THERE ARE OFTEN FACTORS IN A PROPOSED JOB WHICH MAKE IT POSSIBLE TO SERVE FOR LESS THAN THESE AMOUNTS WHEN THE NEEDS ARE WELL DETERMINED AND THE COMPLICATIONS AT A MINIMUM OR WHEN THE CONDITIONS CLEARLY CALL FOR LESS THAN COMPLETE SERVICES. THIS IS KNOWN AS A NEGOTIATED FEE AFTER A COMPETENT ARCHITECT IS SELECTED ON THE BASIS OF HIS ABILITY. SHOULD YOU MAKE SUCH A r 1,. cm MR. M. W. BURNETT CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA PAGE Z 10 DECEMBER 1954 TENTATIVE SELECTION AND FIND THAT THE CHARGE CANNOT BE NEGOTIATED TO YOUR SATISFACTION YOU ARE, OF COURSE, IN NO WAY BOUND TO CARRY ON WITH THAT PARTICULAR ARCHITECT. WE BELIEVE THAT YOU WILL FIND THAT YOUR INTERESTS WILL BE BEST SERVED BY PROCEEDING ON SUCH A BASIS AS OUTLINED ABOVE. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED ON A BASIS OF PRICE ALONE CAN AND HAS TURNED OUT TO BE A VERY EXPENSIVE HANDICAP TO A PROJECT. THANK YOU AGAIN FOR THE OPPORTUNITY YOU HAVE PROVIDED US TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THIS DESIRED WORK. MWJR : RB ENCLOSURE (PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT) YOURS SINCERELY) MARCELLUS WRIGHT & SON BY: MARCELLUS WRIGHTy JR. ,%Wl Naoo COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA M. W. BURNETT Dise"o4 at Im EXECUTIVE SECRETARY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IRVIN G. HORNER. CHAIRMAN CLOVER HILL DISTRICT RAYMOND J. BRITTON MANCHESTER DISTRICT ROBERT O. GILL MATOACA DISTRICT HAROLD T. GOYNE BERMUDA DISTRICT .TAMES P. GUNTER MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT STANLEY R. HAGUE, JR.. DALE DISTRICT of a +r #Q" gat 009"t"03A 001Wi j' is ;la=lm 0 add so tbo Room ;V1341" a s two to than aftool, 30%rd otfIftes We WW i.W*ll* OP3 XIP" sit to eight rams, via is" guitr late1vaud In aoft2tsbdag your a chodul1 of ah s. and it you VOW be "A ila tide p"300t. Yours ♦ar3w two I sw ft*ousl" I t*37 CARL M. LINDNSR, OR. CARL M. LINDNBR,JR. CARL M. LINDNER ARCHITECT MEMBER AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS OA..0 13 SOUTH end STREET • RICHMOND 19, VIRGINIA 13 December 1954 W. M. Burnett, Executive Secretary Board of Supervisors County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Gentlemen: In regards to your letter of 7 December 1954 regarding architectural services, we wish to state that we would be very much interested in this project. This office has been in the architectural business for tije past thirty-six years and we will gladly submit pho#os of our work and references if you so desire. Our fee is 6% for plans, specifications and supervision, the same based on A.I.A. standards, or a cost-plus basis as outlined in the Virginia "Blue Book" (Manual on the Planning and Execution of State Capital Outlays ). We trust this is the information that you desire. Please notify us if you desire additional information and or a personal interview. Very truly y urs, Carl M. Lindner, A.I.A., Architect M n VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD October 22, 1954 IIN RE: RELIEF FROM ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENT OF PROPERTY This cause came this day to be heard upon the petition of George W. Moore, Jr., Treasurer of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, and it appearing to the Court that the assessments as set forth in said petition were erroneous and that such erroneous assess. ments should be exonerated as provided by law, on the property described in said petition; and the assessments being defended by the Commonwealth's Attorney, the Commissioner of Revenue having due notice of the filing of same and the Court being of the opinion that these assessments were erroneous and that the erroneous assess- ments should be corrected and the tax payers exonerated from paying such tax assessments and that Mrs. Bertha Evans, Rt, 2, Chester, Va. be refunded the $38.00 so paid by her into the County Treasury. It is therefore ORDERED that the amount of $9.50 now owed on the property of J. Harvie Mat -tin at als as set forth in the petition be exonerated and the amount of $9.50 assessed for the year 1952 on this property is adjudged an erroneous assessment and should not be paid. It is further ORDERED that the amount of $38.00 paid by Mrs. Bertha Evans, Rt, 2, Chester, Va. should be refunded to her as so paid into the Treasury of Chesterfield County on personal propertl assessment, which was actually business personal property assessed to Shady Side Tourist Court for the year 1952 and that this be adjudged an erroneous assessment. An Extract, Taste: � cm I. I1Mt'lsps Ur tT at f aritlMftOJd to Geoldap domealtlat OatOasaor Jrat+osals to "M a**&& 4SPAWSO& st amdatiag watosr WAMly assd tz%at- mat tasillues. A-040MONAWASM we oemOt tsr asar Xy wa srtaaraaas taroatmat, distAlwatleas aart timm,"me sWuWhrl". ZI . qmimw 4jss lko tiraa OwNtittlas pwravesats drawl& bo roeoguisod saairiwiUss i>s tit tisu at wrsw taaarillttsta aat resisteava sat us►aar" Aa uw Cs>Mrrouna th at ♦irglasla as r9qulj4d Vy jAwr to ash' OV saw 004arOri,aa9 aaarvloos. A. al"I r. Impoatmboat and 2roatm*%. ilk* as etlud r"antler laaaltids a staarais r°ososerv►Ir bt daaa at ailpv*dxatolr 1309 ►# S%Uosm aad a trsMa wwat plaat of osM *IUl6a ,t 110 M PW OAW GOV" 14. fur plaatt XW s YOft Ros al sIMMt TO at aasasalmaa ssq►awa IW. 4jwm t *ese *dosing tawallAtAss bo *WLwool W SIMMU a asar samarswa of WOMPU U latwwa tlOW With the tlasra t et" oosaat artlag a ►lssaasariraarjr Utilities? fts weessaa vy saasemoatto are oat baatt to ralar %W ISOVI at the wd*Uaag arasspr it rsrrr+aat too$ if a seesaaw, .Also wowti► is my asgmtsrd vbaarqiw tits ads" " troatarasat plash s U14 bo S. atosra". o, existing sysum am ratilims um" 1409 O mar 0101MW $$Mao to mk* WA ess 710,,000 Oder posai %ral stora4u to&. adailoasa am aokmAt as to 1*sta►tiat, slaw* sat obaditioa at la- stallatloss at a"ItAonal staara s to lUUxs. C. �islar':srllaat. tw Coustr &oasrom from tiM oaclue4wing Lire *00401 r*- sosassaasdaAlosM as to sAaao sad lsaaatloa of am t*odw s Am # koro are son 01 orlueal av*ss cribs► us usat r +lava to away a�roos,101"W Its►aetJt. `OW VASIOP thrOS49k VIS Ad Of QOWtr offices A fti *Xr#a V` V&ttera DW bs ostablishod. thers, 4wm. In some loostiolas smtirelr imadotusts " - tribaatioa► asdas, *no rwaltiaad iaa, ~I**"& Uses &wine posk pwio&*. bsoeaaaaearatatlems calm ssaAt for oUaaalaalrwtS a of Ww" souittiaaaaaao tho 4kmaty 204mor 'is* win a*ri" as to tko" 01VO610 arsra* looations. D. plasmaaslaat. Tho QtaasaafAwtI#1A COVOU "ter System saw has a UAW laadebteamss of $1.360*000.--lemoomiatioss sro *$a&t a►s to a p ro- umisur cost ostlaaste of Wised bglgrsmmests alms with a tiaa usias asbeda►le. ` LU 11SAWAS SOMAR1O ate bo Utf INA by Um Som rd of bnwrisoro is arriving at a mued for proviums tho aaaa ossur rumas for oosstftotioaa. S. Gaaawrral coaarditioas. S wrist AS Rsm►lW srstOu WO SOW 200 aides of W&tear limes a+aaA a w aadmiatsi r sastaaaars. Us Pastel filtr4ioa pumt distribution *yet** is swplsmr ool br vayrlow wau sit" which we bo- soisLmg soot oaapaa wlvo for =daataualaaaaas miss to ads &*A ossrl*A, Thfoo are so+rmml areas in tiara OWM#fir vush are aac►v saarv" ,bv tmi.ivtft&% well apt, +a`ml it to domiaed %bat as aarwaar of tress & roas as lWastleal 'bo sopu4d from the filtration. Plant. IT. a'fitislUM eso spssftlasatioas wo cart tome as a 04" as to tho soots Of this PMOS A s04aaasariaaS wWkv and is no wW ar Wists Haar sagiagmigg tiss e44640A to a nks tacos stvdiss. AU iaat"omstioaa is poommosloa of me ilaa►"tr will bo sm&* saaailablt So the saginoo s to frasilit&to tbis prejo". e V/ // resent C,414-f 74e Z��& i RAI Jon �e� 4� je '! -47 jV1/r67, i Ale Z�WeX74ol- a 19 e- ll 0 � 49*04' 4p 4p .rne-(3n'iqoK mov%P-A$ me I We, Jcco&64 4Qaf/ OaL.4i ,*P m 3 �G�%`G/ ah /ice roli�C OT cC.rt ! A Sit/E r. the C- wv T-c-✓ M+ p t ,� 1 ✓ N t. S G c o►ss d J _ _ _ _ r,*^ r HOL 3 o V, tc, C-I s-e c. ill - k e 74 4-e e r e iG a( 0 1<<!a. -/c V - lofd-ye's /J% V* � � r CCO ar r$ �j �,ry `s , w ,-a m �- A.s �j� r S G' , W, (it<_DYi-.:.a ,ew.. " _..__-(�$.e �o► - ✓ ms .. %1 G %raw ,� ✓ r a�_� Alo �J-e- a-�• ,• �-e .a- 3 r e-p t f 4r 1 __ Wit_ s d._ 1 1. X.f`f + / fI A /� �4! d T Se�Oi Oi _ f .e _VlAP— e/ 0 o v IC--s- j I%n v �i - a-J' ,/' -C a i� 7!Ke 110 r-40. E' - ©✓'Q r a ct IaG e i If f/�''� cTac< Son-1 le iy1 air 4cSf+ A.aAfast ♦N�lpo(/J g° {,Ga. CwlAc.� _ ! OYl /l1, GJ fi.c `i•L...r �cscyYc,T ��]y�Jy T �J � y / � Y r,1 • • I i�a 1�. /� ` DQr /�. ' C.. �i. I•l i� P... �f/�[.f GR ..- Q �-K-C ? / _ - !J U&I .� z -- r%% K. / ?.h �f err / or (� Ta w 4, AA 74� -57�L4--- -� A- Y S,401 d b _ `' A l'j 4, k . %1s .0o m r t,.r__u_ lip 1-$ o h A e � f ym r r J/ J a Gd i wrle J avM- 017`� I 4e or gv/ ' -yft/ `I e e d Aodr-c hrcl3wcj- !.ol! r a,*l It f, ,! lost -e-Al • 7`- Z40f r / / / �!s fcvSJ is v+, .► �l f /' � '_ d /�G 1�/(�/%J!_ , Of�a!'r�9 yr _ "' i c/-M Ka C. Z _ �GS AL 4 , , I ` / �i / .lG� F . Nv, ?-,cam S-a C-A-vv d s ' � 1 w O a-� .0 /3v�� i /40�4 A YYrr m m 0 0 AI Gwos4eb", move-j" Mae 114-0 1- v e Seca W44 P E. 7- 1., c4 eme Z;ie -re/,ec 74/ /'f -Ir. 4 ArIO -4 P,al JFA'�;-C le 41401 �e-do a c � A.11V T 7 e, 7-11" 1.,)Al..7z jirza/ #*No V-e- fe 11foe d.-d ;O4 dl -F 4e Ale- re i c e,&,ot d 4" 74c)�Al P ft ova 74'. w .0 -A- --*J r w•G /yl o v�G.,f l///� r i h !o / 74 w d l000ll�j kn o v-,c i Y-e.e, Kr'do�e - 40 /* xo� C, /& tles, GX �w� � �� l✓a Tom✓ �I •�.G �f'v tJ � �h /G � �_ _ 'Ta �V rGE j /V e,l10 vt Gov✓l. '-.a I Movies �%%d /`� d� cS2 G®'yt d ✓ !" I& PAL At. r jpi- O D 4. fM,- 6:ve7 10d a oWv✓G1,_ �%✓ r��TfO L7_.S G�r►aL.f I We FW w J C _ /Y!-e-, e74 t I_ f r O �i tin✓�CS OO✓1 O �!�✓i a �.SYpt�CC i