Loading...
1955-05-10 Packet�. .0",:,,1..a ear �r�wwii,��r► VYMINIA8 At a regular Aesting of the Board of Supervisors of chesterfield County® held at the Coosthowe on May 100 19550 at 9130 aom* Presents Mro Irvin GoHoraer, Chairman biro No To Coyne *9 ToP4 UAt0r DreRCbt ® O*G111 Xro RoJ oBritton Mr.8touloy RXegue, yr. This day MreToToMoo7re appeared before the Beard to again diseuss the "tsx of obta lust a suitable supply of water for the subdivision of Bevlsh Village, requesting the Board to allow him to maid a temporary hook-up tb the near well recently dug which has an inadrequatO supply of water to sar►a 8 hou6e6 already constructed and sold, Mro Moore agreed that the seas guarantee as to the voter supply and other restbiotionG be given on the proposed well as was siren on the well recently construatedo It was generallT agreed that a coat reat oovering the matter be approved by the Board first and Usa signed by Nr a Mou rs, and that Mr. Moore be allowed to oonneot a maXUk= o! 8 houses to the existing Won as a temporary measure 0 until such time as a am well with an adequate supply of water oaa be drilledo This day come Mro Biggs asacl others* residents of the Overstreet 804111410st sear Stop 459 off the Harrougets Road, requesting the Board to ieWtP1'e said road. On Action of YroG'tlys e, secas�ied by Yr.Brittcno it is resolved that the Roeidaat USIneer and the County Road Rinser be and thay we hereby requested to obtain prices for the isaprovement of the above described 2�0 eda And be it further resolved that the road ru=4xg westwardly fssaa the RarrmSate 'Road in said Overstreet Subdivision be imprwed by the Higbr ey Department and sold cost be oba rged to ih a 31( Road Fesd or the COUNAY Pod be it further resolved that the foregoing resolution sathosizlsng the highway Department to improve sold road in the Overstreet S*divisioa be soft to the Mghway Department 'upon the payment ad' one -halt Of, the estimated cost of %bee road by residents of said road* This day, Chase Cosasntruotion Company, Zaoo,oaue before the Board by Taaea W,Gordona Tro® it Attorneyo and filed its petition requesting that the Board OkwAoa under the provisions of Title 3 ?69U-?6o2C of the Code of VirgWa of 19509 a portion of Grindall Crank Park and more particularly described in said pst•itions Wborsupo49 on action of Giro Britton, seomAed by UroGunbar, it is unanimously resolved* to That the Board do consider end act on the petition of Caaese Conwtru:;tion Coatpaxry, Inc., at its regular meeting to be held on June it, 1955 o 2. That the follWing notice be posted by the sheriff of the Connity at the !rout door of the Courthouse and on as least three (3) plea" along Land on emote or the said roads proposed to be abandoned and that the petitioner do cause said notice to be published twice LA the Richmond TIme,s.-Dispatch, a m uspaper having general circulation In the "LUAU; said posting and publication to be done at least thirty 430jdeys prior to June 146 19550 That the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County pursuant to the provisions of Title 33-76ol3m78.20 of the Code of VirMtnia of UW as amended hereby gives notice to the public that It Intends to eonelder at its meetint to be held in Its aaeetiaag room at Chesterfield Conrthotaee at 10 010lock 0a rune 149 191559 and act an the petition of Chase Construction Qaaapanayg Inc., that the Board of Supervisors abandon She following roads as detiaa d is sold seatione. to -wit, t 1. Gr ndall Parkway extending from the western line of Bout* No.l, 502.3.0 fast, more or leas, to the Intersection with tha>a' roar lines of Lot 1, Block D, and Lot llo Block C, Griadall 0roak Palk, as eitended toward each other* 8. The 20 toot access lip* Wanift northwardly from, Watkins Avenue for a distance of 822d39 feat,, more or less, both as ohms as the plot of Grindall Creek Ps7kv made by John H.IbIter, dated Marais 318, 1948, recorded In the Clark's Offloe of Chesterfield Coftsy is Mat Book S, paw M and 126, on the ground that said roads here never bees opened for t.ravdl and are not naoassary foe pablia used This day Mr. Croup and fir. S,T.Wogstaff eassee before the Board requesting the sbandcammt of a portion of Powell Road in Bon Alt Heights. ADd it appearing that the sbandonmsnt of said road is r*eo=wnded by the City planning Cosaaalssion sad the ad joining property ownerw s u#ona► copsiderstion whereof and on motion of Mr. Guater, seconded by Nr. 0ayns, it is resolved that the following motion be approved: Resolved that the Board of supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, approve* the vacation, of all that portion of Powell Road,nd described as followst All that certain parcel or land eatbraeed within the bonaads of Powell Road and designated on a plat dated May 39 Ifte, as" by Chaso H. IUet end Assooiatea, Civil RAgIneers sad Surveyors -"am Powell Road to be Closed", a copy of which is attached to the deed from W*Tyler Haynes and Alice M* Haynesi his wile, dated May 109, 1955, and to be recorded aimaltaseonsly with this sesolutionp As set forth IS a certain Instrument bearing date as., the 10th day or fe May 1955, esecud by !!.Tyler Haynes and Alice No Haynes, his wife, ftioh was presented bo this meeting, and a copy thereof fildd with Beim Board* der c3*400 - This day Mr. 0*7oKellam, Resident Taginser, Virginia Department of HISbwaye reported that the coat of improving Grove Road in SW=7 Doll Acre* Subdivision would be approximately $558050a This day tbsre arose a discussion as to the County*s requirements of specificatiaas for cunt$ and gutters in subdivisions. And it was .pointed out that the Highway Departm*nt would approve Curbs and gutters with the gutter width of 18", 'Pon consideration vhweof, and on Mtioo of Dr. gill,, seconded by Mr.BrAtton, It is resolvod that this Board doth approve curbs and gutters with a gutter width of IS" when isastelled In subdivisions in Cheaterflold Gou►ntyo This day the U*Mtive °acretary read a letter from Yr. Tar West coacenaing the public land#ngs on the West aide of the James River Md it watt 9ensr&117 agreed that Mr. Goyne and the Rdseutive Secretary woujA investigate this matter and report at a later metiago This day the Mecative 3ecratary read a ]s tter from Xro Rol. Scheitlin concerning the condition of Rt.6% ead requesting some improtemoat to •amen It was geaslrall,}r agreed that Mr. 411am a Resident Engineer, would invasstigate this complaint a This day the matter of the improvement of Rto7430 commesn4 ealb d the Burnett* Road, was discussed and it was generally agreed that Are Kellas 'would investigate this oomplsint o This dap Mr. R.d.Britton, presented a letter fron Mro Barton Maryee Mist Jkgtaser. Virginia Department of Highwap, which letter was is amwer to a petitions filed with the Highway Department by Mr. Britton, which petition called for the lowering of Rto 1 of the DuPont interseatios, at Stop 17o Mro Mary* stat9d that in his opinion the $3000000e00 allegation would be ourfiotent for the proposed improvemat. Mr. Britton requested Mr. Kellam to remove a tree from the right of way on Rt. 10, iimediately south of Snead Road. Mr@Brit ton requesting the Resident Fueze ere Mro C. F.Kellaa, to get a price on the Improvement of a road leading southwardly from, Rt.60e kre Britton questioned the Eesident Engineer,, Ur. Kellen, on sme work for *o James R. Condray of Cooks Road. lira Kellen stated that the Highway Department could not do work on private drives. This day Xr. Gcyns requested lbs. Kellam to bard -surface Dalavial Aweaue in Cho a to r, the s sme being Rt. 1503. WbOr®upon Mr, Kellam, at *tad thtp the traffic sound was not sufficient to warrant the herd=surfaeing of this road at this tilm® 0 This day Mr- hater agala questioned Vr, Kellen conoerniV9 the cawpUtloa of a snr W and piroPesl for closing two grade cros®ings La Hat Airs Mr. Kenai stated that the suiloy had not Bret been conpleted, that the Highway had received a letter from )be 161tuesr of the Boa Air Industrial 8ah0e1 tippoeiog the present p3roposseals wA offered ftaoamndattione for cotuideratiea to be givo n to the conssoMmtion of this road fro& 30 tuft Of US Gowttye Ur !hotter questioned the status of the road loading wastwwaly, fz= itto #1 to the Cute ENtede in Bermuda Distriato Whereupon it was, reported that no right of war had been found as yet and Ur Goyae, suggested Chat the recaade be examined more closely as said road Was once a County road, Ott motion of Xro Hague,, seconded by Dr. Gill, write usual rexolutiow Ca Mess, In Woodbury Subdivlslcn to have same talon Sato the State Ss+oondssy System* Thia day-.1tv. D.W.ldurphmy appeased, representing Mrs Le R.Go ne, requesting the ISMAing front Agrioe !tuft to General BUSLWe►o of the following dsserlbed parcel of lands In Bermuda It laterial DIxtrict, a parcel of land fronting 550 foot on the vest side of the business &me lossg Rt. 01, and extending we8tw"17 I= :teat more or leans, said parcel, being am" Rte #1 froa Chesterfleld Avenuso T3pon ooJtsldsratioa whereof artd OR motion of UNGOynee saftaded by Mr.Britton, It, is resolved that the eforedesc ribed parcel of land be and the s am is hroby seyoaaed to General Business, This day. Mrse John SaMeth came before the Bond requesting. the resoalag !raft Agriculture to General Business of the following desoribed parcel of lauds Is Midlothian Magisterial District, a parcel of laud frosting on RU340a 80 feet and extending southwerdly 800 Meets said pawoel being 19M feet west of R*.boss And presented letters frog Mrs &BeToombe and Mrs Wilson Tho use, which letters stsbod that the slapers had no oblectioa to the proposed "zonibg e Up= eoasideratioun whereof and on motion of Mro Mere seoondrd by Mr -Britton, it is resolved atht the atbredesorilted parcel of land be sad the Now is hereby rezoned for General Busluesso This day 'Mrs K,K*0 •Kenna came before this Board requesting . the ressoning from Agr1oultare to General Business of the fancying described parcel of land In Ustoaca Magisterial District, a parcel of land fnating on the Aorth side of RtoMq , a distance of IN feet fad extending northwardly 200 feet along the eastern line of Hamptas Aleauso Cause also Nro Abram Minton, Mr. Calvin Mintoa, Ure T.H.Purcell and Mrs* La V.1dwards, opposing the proposed rezoning, oiting the tact that the land was uzad for residential purpor se at this time and that a business establishmsat on. Rt o36 at thib polut would be most undesirablo. Upon eoneiideration whereof and on notion of Dvo Gille seconded by Mro Goya&, it is resolved that the application of Mr. lCo$oo'Benaon, be and it hereby is denied without prejudioero Mr. Horner stated to the Board that he was Interested in the zoning oasis following and relinquished the gavel to Dr.Gil.l, and declared be will not vote on the issue. 7Mia day Mr. Kontague and Mro Sykes from tha Cities Service Oil Company came before the Board requesting the rezoning from Residential-8 to General Business on the following described parcel of land: In Manchezter Magisterial Districtsa paroal of land fr*ntly$ 175 feet ova the Osuth aide of Rto3600 and 150 feet on the east Bid* of Barr wood Road. And requested almo that the appIleationfor rezoaiog tOftneral Bseiinsss be reduced to Local Busiriesso And prevented a petition signed by sons 14 oiUMW stating that they had no obj*otions to the proposed re2ou age Came also" Mro ProUtIoe, lira F.V$U c Weber. presenting a petition signed by sons 41 citi.z*nx who were ambers of ReMay Namsrial Methodist Churoh opposingeaid rezoningg and stating that the rezoning of this parcel of land would be a detriment to the operation of the Church. Whereupon Uro Montague stated that he had the written approval of the great majority of citizens living within 500feet of the property in questione Upon consideration whereof, tdrn Britton reads the following motion, which was seconded by MroGoynee Rosolved, that the zoning of the aforadescribed parcel of land fry Residential, to Local Businoes, be amd the soma in bareby dsnfsde Whereupon, lira Gunter offered a substitute motion i6loh was aaconded by Mro Hague: Rosolvod that the pibperty in question be and the saps is hereby zoned for Local Businesso The vote being tgkea, tiro Gunter, Mro Hague and Dr -Gill voted. *Ay►o". Mro Britton: and Mro Goyho voted "No': Whereupon the Commonwealth's Attorney ruled the said motion passed and said land had been properly resonedo This day !dips l J.Gorman, Cams Warden, presented the game claims to the Board® on .action of Mr® Gaunter, seconded by Dr.Gilla it is resolved that said claims be paid as presented. MroA.;.Horner, Forest Fire Warden, appeared before the Board citing the fact that he had, to the beat of his ability, inspected the back puck pumps and other materials supplied by the State Forestry Service: that the County had approximately f4000,,00 worth of back peak pumps in.operetion, and that since these pta w were of an intricate design that they were easily wade inoperative" This dad/ Mr, R.T.Brittou stated be had made an investigation of the power wagaa presently in use by the Clover Hill Fire Departmft and said equipaseat was in need of Some repetrf however, he recommended that this equipment be transferred to the Adlothlan Fire Department es per their request upon the receipt of the new power wagon for Clover Hill Fire Dept* %*a consideration. whereat end on motion of Mr.Britton, seconded by tiro Guatera it is resolved that the BSteeutive Secretary notify the Clover Hill Fire Department that this piece of equipment should be transferred to the Vidlotblan Fire Deportment at their conveniences This der Mr. S.LoWums, appeared before the Board citing the feat that the Federal Housing Adainiatratioa would not guarantee loans on properrty served by private water systems and in the subdivision of Grow* Place, the majority of lots still being aimed by Mr. Mwaa, was served with his ova water systet, which involved Bowe 2" line and scree 10 line. a 100-681102, storage tWko positive action pump„ and a swell of at ]*set 6-gpem capacity, And stated further that be would like, to deed this system to the County is order Chet he might e•v*lop the remadaing lots in sold subdivision, Upon consideration mhereof it was generally agreed that the County Srngineer would havestigate this well and report at the nest moeting of this Boardo This day the budget for the year 1985-956 in the amount of VaG299203o60 which was tentatively adopted April 13* 1955, and having been duly advertised according to law, was *gala considered, and it is resolved Cat motion of Mro Goyne, seconded by )1r.Britton, that the budget, including all various departments of the County as noted, bee and the gauze is hereby approved and adopted as the budget for the year 1255-9669 with the exception that $600*00 be transferred frog the unappropriated surplus of the General FMA to 6b.1069 which fuad is hereby Increased to allow the eaployaant of a part -ties deputy sherift. Whereas , in accorumaz" with the law of the Comaronereslth the proposal to adoptand fix levies required by the budget for zhs year IIB5.956 has been m-4* vublio, and whereas, this day was fixed for public Hearing oa same, vitas, Therefore, on Motion of Mr.Coyne, seconded by Mr.Britteas it is resolved that the following general levies for the County of O"Stsrtield In support of this budget heretofore adoptodt be, and the sew are fixed to -wit: All Districts $2*20 for real personal property, and all Districts 40d sachinerr tsto This dye WroleS.Molatyre of the Southwest Virginia Building Company appeased before the Board requesting the Board's approval of some* pro - fabricated houses called the "American Homles~. Ur. Molatyrs azplainsd that these houses were being built in the City of Xchmond and Bsarico County. Whereupon, Ur.Goyaq made a notion, that permits be issued to Mr. McIntyre for the construction of the American Home in the Wentworth Hose Sites, subject to the approval of the Building inspector, which motion died for the want of a Second. Upon further consideration and an motion of Mr.Goyne, seconded by Mr.Britton, It is resolved that this matter be referred to the Building Inspector for his recommendation end to be considered at the next meeting of the Boardo This day the Chadraw read a letter from the Leas -as of Virginia Comtism oitins the fact that the National Aaaooiation of County Otfloials would meet is RIElmwssd, July 17 tharu S0, quad Whereasp it would be nbcsseary moms enterteiAwat be given, for ties delegates to thin Convention. it Is resolved on notion of Mr. anater, seconded br Mr. Coyne® that this Hoard donate $1: oaoO to the League of Vizglnis Counties to be used for this purposes This dap the request for advertising in a souvenir progras to be wed at the N.A.C.Oo Convention was discussed and tka matter was deferred for further comideretiona This der the ftecutive Secretary read a letter from Mrad.L.Porter, President, League of Virginia Counties, ,WAS the fact that one again the loeal governMr* affioialst Conference would be held in Charlotteovinis ant August 296, 30 and 31st, and uxged all interested to attsaida This dap► the Rxecutive Secretary presented a report frost the tbaaterfield County Planning Comazisatlon on the toning studies it has been making for the post twelve months, and presented also a Master Plan of zoning with averlat78 showing the section of the County which should be zoned imrilately because these areas are subject to uses that require definite wniago Tbsre wane presented also five (3) general recommendations adopted by the Planning Commission and addressed to the Hoard of Superrisorso Mr. Qorns stated that the County should hold public hearings oa eaobh area Involved before the Master Zoning Plan is adopted, The Bzecutive Secretary stated the t tye Rester Plan as proposed by the Lif aing ConsUsioa was presented to the Hoard for Its consideratiea and the Bowid, was not expected to act on said plant without oonsiderabL and rerriaar of said Pinata consideretioa %hereof and on sation of Mr.Coyno, ssoonded by Mr. Britton, s resolved that thusPlan be raozlrol. *"Ith twhanks to the Pl#=Iag 4oamtssion its sftbrts in its making* This day tho Lsecutive Secretary read a letter from. Vublemen and Hayhoe, and Mr-AUXAe 8. Meat complimenting the Hoard on its stand takes is disapproving the proposed cbonge is the definition of a subdivision. This der the 8'zeautive Secretary read a letter front lire R.go'sarrea, Colo Corps of USIneera p Norfolk District, stating that drawbridges across navigable waters will not be open to navigation, during certain civil defense warnings, Thin day the Bzeoutive Secretary read a request from Mr. Albert Borttstoia. District Jif6ager of the Neightao-hood Theatres. requesting possission for a pyroteohaios display on Ju17 e, 1.955" On cotton of WoQoyae, seconded by MroRaguea it is roe oked that tbis Board grant the requested pernission to have asriel pyroteohniae display on July 40 1955, provided the Bellwood Theater will make arrangements for adequate fire proteatioaa, that all fire works wi11 be !,gaited by canpetent personnel and that t1w Bellmod Drive-ln-Theater will asonrg the nes»seery permits from the State Pollee to transport the fireworks upon their arrival in the area to the Bellwood Drive -In Tbaate ro This day the fteoutI" SearetsXy read a letter from Mfe Taos Y. Robertson, which letter states that the Chesterfield County Pom ►a aXange wishes Camp Baiter facilities to be used by handicapped during the winter months and a aemp fbr underprivileged children in the Sumer eaMU#* Upon consideration whereof and on motion of Ur. Haguse seconded by biro Goyue, it is resolved that a copy of said letter be given to the Coaemittee now st%*1zg the disposition of Coup Baker* Sin day the Itacutivo Secretary reported that the records of the Q1ark's Office had boon eXueisosd by Mr4T•00rdoa Bennett, Aadltor Of Public A000uats, and a fuU accounting was made for all fuade in his austody, and acid Agditor coaamaded Mr* Vadens Clark of Courts for the eseoalleat aWUW in whioh his records had been prepared* This day a request for a variantw is 'the building restrictions of the County woo given to the Hoard by Xro Harold Io Robertson, which variance would altar WA to build a garage 5-feet from his side Linos also them was pareseated a written statemat frota Mr* Clarease T* Bradley► and Kro Wn, J. Robertsoz, saying that they had no objections to the granting of this variance* Upon oonaideration whereof and on motion of Dr. tulle seconded by Yr* Goynee, it is resolved that a variance be granted to Mrn Robertsos for a garage to be built not Zees than 5-166t fMK the 8100 lies of his property at 214 Ralloway Avenue in the Villsg* of ttatoaese This day Mro L*B.Goodwyu requested a variance which mill allow his to make an addition, to a house facing Rte M in Bermuds Mstrteto On motion of YrAcyae, saeca"d by greGmAer' it is resolved that this Board great Mro L.B*Goodwyu a variance to allay an addition to a building ehich is at present 23-feet from the edge of the road o This dey We XoL.Reaaae requested a variance to allay the so stmet of a garage 5 lest from his side line at 46th Street and Stockton Sttrelo And presented a written st atemeAt saying that adjoining property mere had no objection to the granting of this variance. On aaotioa of Urn Britton, seconded by W*Goyneo it is resolved that this Board grant the requested variance* On motion of 14r.Britton` seconded by MraGoyneo it is resolved thi the bill from the firm of Hayes, Seer Vattern and. Mattern in the mount of $350.000 which bill is fbr a prelia+tiaary report "questing the re9tu4y of the Sanitary District sewer uystem is the narthe= part of the County. on notion of Dr.Giila a aaonded by Mr.Guntsar, it is resolved that a bill for $750*00 frM the firm of Hayes, SeayD Matters and flatters be paid, Which bill is for the prslimivary report requcastIrg the traa 00t, of se araee for th9 Mriok Sanitary Diatriato on motion of Mr.8rittoa, seconded by fire Hague # it U resolved that the Haritss Clubs of the County be enthorized to hold their annual dth of JTU1y celebration on the Fair Grounds of the Conntya This day Yr, George Shropshire, County Ptgin or, presented a copy of Articles of Incorporation, for the Roanoke County Authority. There nose a discussion as to the sale of pipe to other swdoipalitiee and private ia►dividual.se It was generally agreed that Ao further pipe would be sold from the► County of Chesterfield a:Bcept to a auaisaiptlityo This day a further discussion wee held concerning the contract proposed for Kr,I4Ta11oore in the installation of public neater in the Beulah V112890 9ubdivisioa, and it was generally agreed that this contract be aMsnMd and again reviewed by the Board at its next Aeotingo This day Mr,* Shoopehirea County Inginser, presented a regUest to have instalUd a swtering station in the Falling Creek above the Goustyvs water Inoundowt o it was generally zeroed that this matter be dsfsars+sd for fature coulderstiono This der again the matter of sewerage trestveat in the gttrick Sanitary District cans before the Boardo sad it was generally agreed that the Bttriok Sanitary District Committee be invited to stet with the Board of SVparvisors an May Ad, low$ at 9:00 potato This day ag oiaa the matter of hiring a Consulting Rc gim er to make a preltalas ty report on the improvemsht of the County vat or system was dieoussia before the Hoard, and Whereas, the fixot of Causey and Weeks had submitted a price of $11#500*00 for the oo"lUtioa of said report.* upon consideration Whereof and oa Motion of Mrs buster, seconded by MroBritton, it is resolved that this Hoard eaploy the first of Caussy and Weeks to make the preliminary report of the imprr►emsat of the water system for the price of $1.19a00oOD awoording to proposals submitted on March 23 and Mondsed April 28e 1905o Before a vote was taken, Dro dill moved a substitute motion as follass Be it resolved that this Board defer actioaA on this matter until its watt meeting, which nation died for the went of a se cond o , A vote was talosn on, the original mottos, which carried without a disseatieg votao On motion of Yr.GoyneD seconded by YreBritton, it is resolved that the County of Chsaterfleld award the firm of i yttle and Berms a contract to install 7400 feet of 80 pipe on Rto #1 for the sine of $UO2 iOa00, which price is fire lone bid receliedo err -10- 14 A disau.seion sme concerning the omer.genoiee oxiatjAg in the County at this tine. Yr-Britton stated that parts of Stratford Hills, speolfically Marilee Road,, is without hater during Perak parlour and that the County Aunt do sawthing to avoid unfavorable paWlIalty. Mragoyas stated that the preesure on Hinfree Street Is ultresely low and that the Board had pmviouasly decided to replacer the line is gintree Stresta Upon consideration whereof end on motion of Mr.Brittons seconded by Mroftyn!$ It is resolved that the follw iug motion be, adopted. - "In view of the pressing demands for water In certain erase of the County:, and in vies of this tact thasta Water Bond Issue cannot be accomplished in the near future-, be it resolved that $30e00040 be a ppropriasted from the Osnsra-R d of the County to the rater Departsmat Caratructian Fundq wllch fined Is to be used to alleviate these pressing demands." It Is here mated that NvoBrIttonO Mrvo ,oyne and Xro Gunter voted "Aye". Dr.Gill,, and U ro Hague grated "No". 0s motion of Nr.Gurate,ro seconded by .41roCoyAeo it is resolved that the miautes of the 219t o and 28th of Apri1 be ar-d the as sae are ha reby approved. On aaotion® the meeting le a d jou=ta)d until, ltey ago 18MQ at 7g30 pomp JWGjr;sdm 50 TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY; PETITION Your petitioner, Chase Construction Co., Inc., respectfully represents; 1. That by plat dated March 31, 1948, made by John H. Foster and recorded in the Clerks Office in Plat Book 8, pages 125 and 126, your petitioner dedicated to public use a strip of land desig- nated on said plat as Grindall Parkway extending from Campbell Avenue southwardly 592.16 feet, more or less, to Route No. 1 and also an access lane 20 feet wide extending from Watkins Avenue nouthwardly across said Grindall Parkway for a distance of 822.39 feet, more or less, both as shown on a plat dated September 103, 1954, made by Foster & Miller attached hereto and to be read here- with. 2. That neither said parkway nor said lane has been opened for travel to the public and that neither of said roads is neces- sary for public use. Further it would be impractical to open said Grindall Parkway for travel because of the excessive grade immediate- ly east of Campbell Avenue as shown on a plat of the contours of said land attached hereto. 3. That your petitioner owns the land adjoining said roads and fronting on the western line of Route No. 1 which he desires to develop for business purposes if he is allowed to use the land embraced within said roads. 4. That the abandonment of said roads by the County and the use by petitioner of the land within same will result in a bene- fit to the County and the public in that said land would be re- stored to the tax rolls of the County as well as increasing the CM WHEREFORE, Petitioner prays that this Board abandon under the provisions of Title 33-76.13-76.20 of the Code of Virginia of 1950 that portion of Grindall Parkway extending from the western line of Route No. 1, 592.16 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the rear lines of lot No. 1, Block D. and lot No. 11, Block C, Grindall Creek Park as extended toward each other and the 20 feet access lane running northwardly from Watkins Avenue for a distance of 822.39 feet, more or less, both as shown on the aforesaid plats dated March 31, 1948, and September 10, 1954- RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, CHASE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. ih o� V7. By 1-11 r 4/ .'e � / le 4411 f/ RIJ 0 IA � i a � ° o 2 o S��•i3e.91� - �' Iy Z oa� o No 13 '= o� ` I • � 0 w c`- B _ C n -r, a � poi � z 2502" 90"/S, y �"- Se9"IS 00"2E 589'4S 00' � 6R//V0.4L L IPA o � `w,4 Y g. ,f �, e'er •rs"oo iv v, rsi �e 2J0. 30 184.94 /0786' H J 4�y Mca Mur � � ♦_i � p ` o d \ C sey^2c 4O'E JO0.26' \ �` y ° � � a A 0 GNESTE,CF/ELO CGUNTY B 9 o„E_.�_ �lh, G /TY OFIS /�/CNMONO SB9 Sp �' v) Q $3yyya0 A .. 7 This day, Chase Construction Co., Inc. came before the Board by James W. Gordon, Jr., its attorney, and filed its peti- tion requesting that the Board abandon under the provisions of Title 33-76.13-76.20 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, a portion of Grindall Parkway and all of an access lane 20 feet wide located in Grindall Creek Park and more particularly described in said pe- tition: Whereupon, on motion of Mr. seconded by Mr. it is unanimously, RESOLVED: 1. That this Board do consider and act on the petition of Chase Construction Co., Inc. at its regular meeting to be held on June 14, 1955. 2. That the following notice be posted by the Sheriff of the County at the front door or the Courthouse and on at least three (3) places along and on each of the said roads proposed to be aban- doned and that the petitioner do cause said notice to be published twice in the Richmond Times -Dispatch, a newspaper having general circulation in the County; said posting and publication to be done at least thirty (30) days prior to June 14, 1955: NOTICE The Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County pursuant to the provisions of Title 33-76.13-76.20 of the Code of Virginia of 1950 as amended hereby gives notice to the public that it in- tends to consider at its meeting to be held in its meeting room at Chesterfield Court House at 10 o'clock on June 14, 1955, and act on the petition of Chase Construction Co., Inc. that the Board of Supervisors abandon the following roads as defined in said sections, to -wit: I Im cm 1. Grindall Parkway extending from the western line of Route No. 1, 592.1c)* feet, more or less, to the intersection with the rear lines of Lot 13, Block D, and Lot 11, Block C. Grindall Creek Park, as ex- tended toward each other. 2. The 20 foot access line running northwardly from Watkins Avenue for a distance of 822.39 feet, more or less, both as shown on the plat of Grindall Creek Park, made by John H. Foster, dated March 31, 1948, recorded in the Clerk's Office of Chesterfield County in Plat Book 8, pages 125 and 126, on the ground that said roads have never been opened for travel and are not necessary for public use. May 1D, 1955 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY Im Cm IRIS DES made this 10th day of Way 19558 by ad between W,e TILER HA?M and ALICE M. AA2M11 his wife; WTTNEdSITHt WNSRZAS# the said W. Tyler Haynes and Alice M. He , are the ovaers of properties abutting the hereinafter described portion of Powell Road, as shover on the Ylan of Bon Air Heights, made by W. F. Clark, Certified ourMar, dated May 2s 1949, and recorded in Flat. Book R, page 161,Chesterfield Circuit Court, and the tar existing in said street is held by the •fbressid parties ss the oanors of the abetting land; and tdi M30 W. Tyler 'Room" and Alice M. 'Haynes, acquired title to the abutting property by deed dated April 11 1946, and recorded in Dodd Hook 2960 Page 335, Chesterfield Circuit Court; and WMUSO the parties hereto are the sole owners of land who have an interest in said street, there being no lion creditors as defined in See - Lion 15466,2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia; The parties hereto are the only property owners within the area of land shown on mob plat and reasonably needing such street as mms of ingress and egress; sad! WRERMI the acid street has never boon open to public use, but has retained in undisrapted use, occupation and possession of the parties here. to and their predecessors in title to the abutting lands, and such street is not desirable for the development of leads abutting it or any other 'lauds in Eon Air Heights; and the closing of such street and the vacation of such plat to it will not abridge or destroy mv of the rights and privileges of other property openers within the bounds of the area of land shown on the plat of Hon Air Heights of rocard; and the Hoard of Huperrisrore of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, as the governitig body of that county, by resolution adapted on the 10th day of Mays 1955, a Certified copy of which is attached to this deed, determined that it would not be in the publics interest to ex- EM IM VDWs TIMMYOUt to the and "d interest ,that they w&Y Garry out and execute their staid desiros wW in oossiderotion of the prodeas, the said We Tyler Haynes and Alice Me hsys"s his wits, do declare said map and plat above speaifloally ref*rrrd to and all ether rsoords, a" and plats of that portion of Son air R"ts to be and the was hereby is vacated and somlled as follows All that certain parcel of iaxed *+Weed within the bonads of Powell Road and dosipatsd on a plat dated May 90 19550 made by Chas. R. float lit ASse", a Civil Ugfrej, and r"Wers •- "as Powell Road to the MomAl', a o*W of wh$ch is hereto attached areal ssft ar part hersof. And the said parties do rsepootftlly "Sow fall and absolute sontrols douinion, possession and title of sad to that portion of Powell Road vested in ow as set !'bra! abov*o WIMSS the tbllewing signatures and toslre STATR OF VlRt INIA CITI OF IMCMVD# To"dtx Is the a ersignodg a 1loW7 P+ablie of and hr the Cite afbressids In the State of Virginia, do oert :fir that W. Tyler Rgim and AU** No Voluseg his wifes whose naruts are sib to the tarepsing writfm;s bearing date on the loth day of NO 19558, have aam'ob—awwwedpd the a Gees before roe in u r' uitd► afor aside 01vea under ur baud of Mw 19550 NY *omission WTIM on the,���d+p of 19 �. *AW a I, X, W. PURNMO ga seative Secretary of Th* Board of Supervisors of the Coanty of Chesterfield Virginia, do hereby certify that the following is a true copy of a ros*UUoa adopted by said Board at its meting held on the 14th day of Nor 1955. lLV%D E That the Board of dapervisors of the Counter of Chesterfield Virginia, approves, the vaostien of all that portion of ?*well goad, and des« aribed as foloras Ali that essrtsin pareel of land esbraesd within the bounds of Powell Road and designated on a plat dated Way 3P 1955, mde s:lr Chas. R« noot h Asss oes., Civil Lsngsr., and Surveyors - was Powell goad to be Closed a copy of which is attached to the dead fsrow W. Tylor Usyms and Ali** A. Raynes * his wife, dated Key 2.0, lWs, and to be recorded sisuitaneously with this resolution, as set forth in a ,certain instrasent bearing date on the 14th dale of May 1955, swoeated by w Tyler Mayaea and Alice R. Hsynes, his wife, thich eras presented to this seems, and a copy thereof filed with this Board. Given under m' hand thiids r of Nay 1955. W n CITY W �C"MOND ".2 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 217 GOVERNOR STREET ZONE I9 so ip r c�H,,!'T April 27, 1955 Mr. M. W. Burnett, hcecutive Secretary Chesterfield County Chesterfield Court House, Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: Reference is made to your telephone conversation this morning. We find that the extension of Powell Road east of McCaw Drive is not necessary for the development of the property abutting on the east, and that the land could be used more advantageous if this portion of Powell Road is closed. We, therefore, recommend that the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors take steps to close this portion of the road which has not been opened on the ground. RCB:w Cordially yours, Garland A. Wood, City Planner CHE.ST��F/f11� VV7 Y SECOiyQGPY SYs!EM 4 "Onol � a fir' 1460 COMMONWEALTH OR VIRGINIA DZt'ARTMENT OR HIGHWAYS May 9, 1955 : Mr. P. W. Snead FROM : S. D. Crute SUBJECT: Curb and Gutter - Chesterfield County Subdivision This replies to your memorandum of to which is attached a sketch and Bancroft. As I understand the matter, Mr. strutting certain facilities on Department at the time has that at this stage it may o or dksapprove the design t s, Chesterfield County to t or However, contingent why this Department structed with the and the street4ivkn in effect. / SDC:g cc: Mr. C. F. Kellam, Chesterfield Res. Mr. Kellam i bv6f the 27th pril 21 from Mr. George E. vate contractor con- reets over which this It can be said, therefore, his Department to approve is is a matter for finds proper. �Vie county, I see no reason e s with curb and gutter con - which is otherwise satisfactory standards meeting the policy /s/ S. D. Crute Secondary Roads Engineer m 41 %W �'o �. �.� �- � � � ,Z . T i� deg--/�,Ee 3, < � ¢ � 7¢3 ���� t- �.v---F ,1,1„d�,�G ,may^'✓ a IMMFIWI VO vw Xx*Ov* SO teAF to tint 4*4 ahe* 1vg b da Sty 20 ftoroburg mks 210 24, Virgstia *'5* 195 i a i r ym Bermuda r supervisor ChOSUrfield County Obsours Virgin" Bear M' saw" f,�. !� � r 0• LA and growim nw i of or xawt no county those boat* oft W e'$ thevers"O, t h*s sld county to aj "MY a 0esa tad► to all boats am .0po"Old �. tt , aless�spr M out Into to va.ter huniM s a the MWth side of IMUOR the Board of supordsors of a lis am an Provide t RIV*V bests E ly Ubm not In user, on small *ator edge MA in tbo V604 "A Should t� eater 3*v*1. tvallor map high you will r*400186 that tb* sale %tes motors, truUmn ' tiSMAS � ►t'� + � Mas�►ts Substantial l txw" in their 140-0 .W, ei�r � � sad �lsas aaa� ti ► for t It �tl� MA tax VIVOWS�' ► 1e ids st that a l,is lands be osts I,isbad at the a t + " � dt at � ow just below the �4 s is ttstt t Y~ fly a tl ubd that � eu�i s�a�s the a be sifiiiuled for O"Oletieft st as *a r r Wit* 'VOWS V*VYtruU40 RAP 0 J. A. ANDERSON, COMMISSIONER �' [. P. BARROW, LAWRENCEVILLE, VA. �. S. FLYTHE. MARTINSVILLE. VA. i. D. MAY, TAZEWELL, VA. •URGESS E. NELSON, Mr. JACKSON, VA. f, W. RAWLS, FRANKLIN, VA. H.OWARD C. RO GERS, HAMILTON, VA. TUCKER C. WATKINS, JR., SOUTH BOETON. VA. WILLIAM A. WRIGHT. TAPPAHANNOCK. VA. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS RICHMOND 19. VA. May 5, 1955 Mr. Raymond J. Britton, Member Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County Midlothian, Virginia Dear Mr. Britton: 'NIA - BURTON MARYE. JR.. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER R. P. EL LISON, EXECUTIVE At818TANT WM. R, GLIDD E N, ASeIe TA NT CHIEF ENGINEER H. H. HARRIS. ASBIHTANT CHIEF ENGINEER F. A. DAVIS. PURCHASING AGENT J. P. MILLS. JR., TRAFFIC 4 PLANNING ENGINEER G. D. FELIX, RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEER C. J. ALLARD. AUDITOR IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO ROUTE NO. I PROJECT NO._ Chesterfield County Request for Allocation The petition headed by Mr. J. Scott Parrish, Jr., in regard to improvement of Route I at Stop 17, received. As you probably know the Commission has made a tentative allo- cation in the amount of $300, 000 for six lanes and channelization at the du Pont entrance. We believe that this allocation will be sufficient for this improvement. Please express our appreciation to all signers of this petition for their interest in our highway problems. With kind regards, Sincerely yours, /�� I i� p(- Chief Engineer. cc - Mr. Thomas Bell 313 W. Franklin St. Richmond, Virginia TAX�NO,TIOE .r.rrir+�r That the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County will on April 12, 19651 at 11:30 a.m., at its meeting room at Chesterfield Courthouse, Virginia, take under consideration the rezoning and/or the granting of a Use Permit on the following described properties in Chesterfield Countyt 1. In Bermuda Magisterial District, a parcel of land fronting 550 feet on the west side of the business area along Rt. #10 and extending westwardly 1350 feet more or less, said parcel being across Rt.#1 from Chesterfield Avenues to be rezoned from Agriculture to General Business on an application of Mr. Roy Goyne. 2. In Bermuda Magisterial District, a 35-acre parcel of land fronting 1155 feet on Rt. 618 and extending southwardly 1335 feet more or less, said parcel being approximately 5600 feet east of Rt. 619 on which a Use Permit to erect a television tower is requested by the Petersburg Television Corporationp 3. In Bermuda Magisterial District a parcel of land fronting 180 feet on the Enon Church Road and extending westwardly 280 foot more or less, said parcel being 2000 feet north of Rt. 10, to be rezoned from Agriculture to General Business on an application of Mr. O.K.Perkinson. 4. In MidlothianMagisterial District, a parcel of land fronting 425 feet on Rt.60 and extending acr thwardly 500 feet, said parcel being 950 feet west of Rt. 6789 to be rezoned from Agriculture to General Business on an application of Mr. A. MoD. Holder. 5• In Manchester Magisterial District, a parcel of land fronting 80 feet on Rt•60 extending southwordly 191 feetp the same being Lot 60 Block 2, of the Pinehurst Subdivision, to be rezoned from ,Agriculture to Local Business on an application of Mr. C.T. Johnson. 6• In Manchester Magisterial District a parcel of land fronting 102 feet on Old Broad Book Road and extending southwardly 670 feet, said parcel being 1500 feet west of Rt. #10 on which a Use Permit is requested to operate a Rescue Squad by the Manchester Rescue CgmpaW. All persons favoring or opposing the granting of these requests -are invite4 to appear at the time and place herein stated*- M. W. Burnett Executive Secretary moo° Nei o a 3 L s n IA 44 io r: n to ''`.� n M T A IC E N 0 T I C E That the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County will on May 10t 1955, at 11:30 a,m,, at its meeting room at Chestorf ield Courthouse, Virginia,, t4.ke under consideration the rozonin- of the following described porperties in Chostcrfiold Bounty: 1, In Midlothian Magisterial District, a parcel of lend fronting on Rto360, €30 foot and extending southwardly 'per S Se� 200 fort, said parcel being 1900 feet west of Rt,653, to be r ozonod from Agriculture to General Business on an application of Mrs, John Samoth. 216 In Matoaca Ma istorial District, a parcol of land e of freating on the north side of 2;�3E, a distance of 100 feet and extending port; wardly 200 foot along; the pastern lino 06 s'Iampton-,vontios tobc rezoned from Agriculture to Goneral Business on an application of Mr,K,KoO*Konnor" .,,\ r �a�r i°3, In Manchester Magisterial District, a parcel of land fronting 175 feet on the south side of Rt,360, And 6tS',Ieai 150 feet on the oast side of Berrywood Road, to be rezoned from Residential-2 to General Business on an application of the Cities Service Oil Company, 1,11 persons proposing or opposing the granting of these roquos 'n are invted to appear at the time and place herein stated, Mo ► ,Burnett, Exec, Sec : y. Board of Supervisory of Chesterfield Country, ` iLr,_--* -^.:i=.i, L4o 4A 104- lea a - % L: J n Board Of Supervisors Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Va. Gentlemen: May 9,1955 Hall St. Road Midlothian, Virginia We he reby give oar consent f or the parcel of land on Rt. 360 to be rezoned from Agrianitare to General Business on an ap- plication of Mrs. John Sameth. Sincerely yours, E. B. Toombs Midlothian, Virginia FBT/v J. E. NORVELL, Jr., Agent 2606 HULL STREET TELEPHONE 82-1224 SOUTH RICHMOND, VA, April 20, 1955 Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary, Chesterfield Court House, Va. Dear Mr. Burnett: We are enclosing herewith our check for $10.00 representing the fee for the rezoning appeal to be made by Cities Service on the parcel of land on Route #360 at Berrywood Road, which we discussed on the 'phone this morning. I understand that the hearing will be held at the Court House at 11:30 A. M. on May 10, 1955• Yours very truly, J. E. NORVELL BY Thos. G. No reel l TGN:E O '3 w � REPRESENTING FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY FOR OVER 25 YEARS An CITIES SERVICE OIL COMPANY PRODUCERS -REFINERS -MARKETERS -EXPORTERS RICHMOND 15, VA. FIRST AND STOCKTON STRUTS May 6, 1955 To Whom It May Concern: We, the undersigned, do not oppose to the rezoning of that parcel of land situated at the corner of U.S. Highway 360 and Berrywood Road, which will be used by Cities Service Oil Company as a service station location if approved by the Board of Supervisors. AMP A.M.A230 ON . GENERAL OFFICE: SEVENTY PINE STREET. NEW YORK 3. N. Y. 44� I, F. B. Montague, witnessed the signatures on the attached petition to rezone a property situated at the corner of U.S. 360 and Berrywood Road. In the case of Mr. Ashburn, his power of attorney signed in his behalf. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th day of May 1955 N tart' Public� My commission expires March 25, 1958. n n May 9, 1955 We, the undersigned, request the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County to continue the zoning of the property facing on the south side of Highway #360 in the vicinity of Berrywood Road and Snead Road as "Residential" for the reason that we feel that business property facing the Ramsey #emorial Methodist Church would constitute a hindrance to safety in the area and to the efficiency of the work carried on in this ra— pidly growing Church of 700 members which is serving the re— liglaus and social needs of a great number of people in the corrmvrnitye 41 m LL 41f J cm FIRST MORTGAGE CORPORATION CLAUDE R. DAVENPORT. PRESIDENT MORTGAGE LOAN SERVICING CHARLES E. MOORE, VICE-PRESIDENT W. M. WOOD, SECRETARY T. TUNSTALL ADAMS. JR_ VICE-PRESIDENT RICII1rIOND 14�,VIRGINIA JESSIE W. ENGLEMAN. ASST. SECRETARY T. T. HYDE. IIE I. VICE-PRSIDENT A. R. MELTON, TREASURER ALEX. MCCRONE, VICE-PRESIDENT L. R. PALMER. ASST. TREASURER LARRY C. MELTON, ASST. TREASURER FRANK B. AUSTIN. JR.. AUDITOR JOHN D. BROWN, COUNSEL CASHIER AND INSURANCE DEPARTMENT 912 EAST MAIN ST. Mr. H. T. Goyne, Sr. Supervisor, Bermuda District Route 2, Chester, Virginia Dear Mr. Goyne: May 6, 1955 8TH FLOOR, STATE -PLANTERS BUILDING Due to a recent ruling of the Federal Housing Administration concerning community wells, I am writing to you on behalf of the property owners and interested parties who live on Mason Ave., Grove Place, Chesterfield County. This new regulation pertains to community wells and will involve any trans- action concerning financing under FHA on any property located in Grove Place. We have had a current request from Mr. J.L. Ellis to secure an FHA Condi- tional Commitment to establish maximum value and loan in connection with the sale of his property. This application was put through in the proper order and on April 29th a letter was received from FHA which we quote herewith. "This is to advise that your application for mortgage insurance identified by the case number above, has been considered and it was determined after Preliminary Examination that it does not qualify for the reason given below: In order that the captioned transaction be eligible for Mortgage Insurance, it will be necessary that the Community Tfater System meet the requirements of this Administration, or advise us to the effect that the water company is under the control of the State Corp. Commission, concerning Public Utilities." In view of the foregoing, the question arises as to whether the individual well on the property of EL Mumma could be incorporated into the County system. A`e believe that with the recent ruling of FHA, unless this is done all properties in the subdivision would be ineligible for FHA financing. We believe this to be an important issue as there are a number of vacant lots within the subdivision which might not be sold unless financing of a loan could be on FHA basis and some 7 or 8 existing houses may have to be sold on FHA financing. We would appreciate if you would consider this and bring the matter before the Board of Supervisors for consideration at an early date. Your advices are awaited with interest. TTA j rAh Very truly ours, C. E. Winn Special Heporesentative M TENTATIVE MWET - CHESTERFTNZ COtAQ'PY Year Eliding Tune 30 1956 At a meeting of the'Doard'of Supervisors of Chesterfield Oountyj Virginia9 hold on April/39 1955# at J':30 p,m, the following Ezpendituro Fetimetos and Rovenue Estimates were adopted as the tentative budget for the County for the year ending Tune 309 1956, to -tit: GENERAL COUNTY ZM: 1. County Joninistration 2, osessment of Taxable Property 3, Collection and Disbursement of Taxes and Other Receipts 4, Recording of Documents 5, Administ rat ion of Tusti ce 6o Crime Prevention and Detection 7. Fire Prevention and Extinction 8. Public Welfare 9, Public Health 10, Public Works 119 Advancement of Agriculture and Home Economics 130 Elo cti ons 14, Maintenance of Buildings do Grounds 15, HiCbweyo Road and Street Lighting 18, Miscellaneous Operating Functions 19s Capital Outlay ,appropriation to other Local Funds Unappropriated surplus from General Fund Year Ending Tuns 30 1956 oposed� Expenditures DOG T,NC FW: l2o Gotcation of Livestock & Fowl Appropriation to Other Local Funds Reserved for contingencies VIRGINIA P[1l3LIC AWS ISTINCE: 8• Tublio 4 01{ ro 052l910a00 390484,00 30.;635oOO 18'500000 8 j425 = 122a519o00 26s540,00 4g800o00 19; 00c00 Totals /,23, // 9, 00 14550000 80175*00.f / 6;250000 Glcl�•ei' 26n4,,3.0000 d 7 j80=11 R0 r s 119025000 2365OOoOO I� 807s458o38 12 668o62 060495.00 10i000000 _,. 6,65054O. 01479840000 ETTRICK S_'1 M.MY DISTRICT OPZV21NG FLW: m ubllc Voii5 15i580:00 Reserved for contingencies 21,420600 02,V2380350s00 147g840900 370000000 u m EIPMDITUM To. ols ETTRICK SINITARY DISTRICT DEBT FUND: 20-b Interest on Bonds 01'260•00 Reserve for contingencies 32 115 0, 0 0330375.00 COUNTY ROAD FUND: Reserve for contingencies 0369000*00 369000.00 COUNTY SCHDOL FUND: ,Administ rat i on 37 s488000 Instructions 1#482j870. 00 Auxiliary Agencies 2160700.00 Housing 232y800.00 Fixed Charges 32s000.00 capital Outlay 19962i292e00 ' Debt Service 308,82640 492720976.50 COUNTY UTILITY OPEWJ!ING FUND: ' Public Works 071a500.00 Appropriation to Debt Fund 1060018*75 Appropriation to County General . Bind 30i000.00 Appropriation to Construction Fund 20a000s00 Reserve for eontin83ncies , 7;25 2350000*00 COUNTY UTILITY DEBT FUND: Interest on Principal on Bonds 0880518.75 Reserve for contingencies 143� 143_65 2319662#40 COUNTY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION FUND: W4ter line construction 28%000.00 Installation of water meters .60:;00�,_ 347S000.00 COUNTY GARXE: Operation 866000.00 26*000.00 G101D TOTAL•.•.•*go s,...•.e••.•r••�7�628,?103.9� REVWM SST��� Year Ending June 30, 1956 Totals SOURCES OF R97ENUE:�— Anticipated Surplus at beginning of year 01450000.00 Current taxes 1i657j100.00 Delinquent Taxes and Land Redemptions 630000*00 Miscellaneous Revenue from Local ' Sources 84j750000 Appropri at ion from Other Local Funds 40j000.00 From the Commonwealth 148j500000 ' From sale of Auto Tags 100,000600 o2g238t350.00 DOG TAX FUND: ' Anticipated Surplus at beginning of year 1.0;000,300 Sale of Dog Tags 13,000000 23i000.00 VIRGINIA PUBLIC ASSIST:INCE: ' From State and FlDderal Governments 0109L475+90 From Local IVnds 38r364.10 147#840000 ETTRICK SANITARY DISTRICT OPERATING FW: Anticipated Surplus 179000000 Ragenue from sole of water & sewer charges 19 C 500 40 ' Revenue from connection charges 50000 370000.00 Er CK S.WITIRY DISTRICT DEBT FM: ' 41at icipated Surplus 339375*00 33#375.00 COUNTY ROAD FUND: Anticipated Surplus 14000040 Appropriation from Local Funds 22`*000600_ 360000900 COUNTY SCHOOL FUND: From sale of Bond s 198130592.00 From Commonwealth of Virginia 702j049.27 From Local sources ' 10f2A0.95 Appropriation from Local Fiends �1j747,*094*28. 402720976*50 COUNTY UTILITY OPERVING FUND: Revenue from sale of water 235,000.00 2359000.00 COUNTY UTILITY DEBT FM*. Anticipated Surplus 125j643.65 ' Transfer from Oper. Fund 10620� 1�5 231#662*40 COMM UTILITY CONSTRUCTION FUND Antitipated Surplus 3j000.00 Revenue from connection fees 60j000900 From money advanced by cpstomsrs 2640000.00 Am system improvements (Transfer ' from Operating to Construction) 20,000=00 347*000.00 ROTENCTE ESTIDH,tiTF COWTY GAILIGE: From a ale of goods and a arvioe ; 260000.00 IUTE: 02.20 per hundred for all Distriot. Machinery: 4(4 0260000.00 A. L. PORTER PRESIDENT STANLEY R. HAGUE, JR. IST VICE PRESIDENT C. H. ZEHMER 2ND VICE PRESIDENT H. L. BRANKLEY PAST PRESIDENT C. H. MOON SECRETARY C. A. UTZ TREASURER W. B. SPECK FIELD SECRETARY S. PAGE HIGGINBOTHAM ATTORNEY Organized in 1935 To Preserve and Improve Local Government TO; County Officials of Virginia TELEPHONE 3.3146 FROM: W. B. Speck, Field Secretary VIRGINIA IS HOST TO THE NATIOIN DISTRICT MEMBERS OF EXECUTIVE BOARD 1ST DIST. M. T. GRUBB 2ND DIST. G. W. MILLER 3RE DIST. IRVIN G. HORNER 4TH DIST. W. H. STORY STH DIST. B. M. BECKHAM eTH DIST. DR. W. O. TUNE 7TH DIST. J. M. MCLAUGHLIN eTH DIST. W. W. WOOD 9TH DIST. T. E. TABOR 1 OTH DIST. M. W. FOX April 18, 1955 The National Association of County Officials (NACJ) is holding its 19th annual conference in Richmona, Virginia, July 17th through the 20th. Headquar- ters for the meeting is the John IMarshali Hotel. It has been the custom for the count-; officials of the host state to provide entertainment for the delegates and their .wives attending the meeting. A Committee representing the League of Virginia Counties, the Clerks', Com- missioners' of Revenue, Treasurers', Sheriffs' and Commonwealth Attorneys' Associations is hard at tworv, arranging a program of entertainment. Naturally there will be considerable expens;: attached as there will be around 1,000 per- sons in attendance and certainly none of us would •rant to have it said that the meeting in Virginia did not measure up to previous meetings in Florida, Texas, Massachusetts, Wisconsin or the other states where NACO has met. Virginia entertainers of National recognition swill provide entertainment at the banquet. A trip to Williamsburg, including seeing the "Common Glory" drama, is being considered as a special feature of entertainment. A reception is planned for the evening of the day of arrival of our guests at the meeting. Special entertainment features are being, planned for the ladies who will be in attendance. At a meeting of the Executive Board of the League I was directed to write to the members of Boards of Supervisors and other county officials of each coun- ty asking for county contribution to the League to help defray the cost of pro- viding entertainment for the NACO meeting. M In - 2 - Several counties have indicated their willingness to make a contribution but this effort can only be successful if counties generally participate. The Committee estimates that it will require around $6,000.00 to finance this entertainment. A souvenir program is being planned for distribution both before the meeting by mailing it to the 3,050 counties of the 48 states and for use at the meeting. Recognition will be given in the program to all contributors. Of course, advertising space is also available in the souvenir program for counties to advertise in such manner as they choose the advantages and attractions of individual counties. Rate sheEt and contract for space in the program is being sent the Clerk and Chairman of each Board of Supervisors. A post meeting conducted tour of Virginia points of interest is being considered. This feature would be available to individuals at their own ex- pense but would be at cost to make it attractive for our visitors to see the various parts of the State. Your support of this program of entertainment is necessary to insure its success. Please send your contribution to this office making your check payable to League of Virginia Counties and marking it "SPECIAL CONTRIBUTION." A. L. PORTER PRESIDENT STANLEY R. HAGUE. JR. IST VICE PRESIDENT C. H. ZEHMER 2ND VICE PRESIDENT H. L. BRANKLEY PAST PRESIDENT C. H. MOON SECRETARY C. A. UTZ TREASURER W. B. SPECK FIELD SECRETARY S. PAGE HIGGINBOTHAM ATTORNEY But ]of Organized in 1935 To Preserve and Improve Local Government TELEPHONE 3-3146 National Association of County Officials 19th Annual Convention July 17 - 20, 1955 John Marshall Hotel Richmond, Virginia SOUVENIR PROGRA,I SPACE RATES One page Three quarter page Half page One fourth page Preferred position Double page spread Back cover Inside covers Half page One fourth page SIZE OF PAGES: 82 x 11 COVER: CHROME COAT 65 lb. stock PAGES: 50 lb. white enamel stock SIZE TYPE: 10 pt. century - blue ink $ 250.00 200.00 150.00 85.00 550.00 500.00 400.00 175.00 100.00 DISTRICT MEMBERS OF EXECUTIVE BOARD IST DIST. M. T. GRUBB 2ND DIST. G. W. MILLER 3RE DIST. IRVIN G. HORNER 4TH DIST. W. H. STORY STH DIST. B. M. BECKHAM 8TH DIST. DR. W. O. TUNE 7TH DIST. J. M. MCLAUGHLIN 8TH DIST. W. W. WOOD 8TH DIST. T. E. TABOR 1 OTH DIST. M. W. FOX COST OF CUTS, COLOR AND SPECIAL HANDLING TO BE BORNE BY ADVERTISER DEADLINES: PROOFREADING BY ADVERTISER - May 20 PRINTER - June 1 MAILING - June 15 *40 SOUVRNIR PROGRAM for 19TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY OFFICIALS Richmond, Virginia, July 17th through 20th TO: League of Virginia Counties 302 County Office Building Charlottesville, Virginia Please insert our advertisement as submitted, in the above publication, to occupy space as indicated below: Terms: Check with order. SIGNED-- ---- ---------------------------..................... .-------------------------------------------- TITLE .--------------- COMPANY----------------- ---•...................................... ..__..__..... ADDRESS------------------------------------ :._......._.............. DATE........... ....•--------...... ----............... 19........ SOUVENIR PROGRAM for 19TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY OFFICIALS Richmond, Virginia, July 17th through 20th TO: League of Virginia Counties 302 County Office Building Charlottesville, Virginia Please insert our advertisement as submitted, in the above publication, to occupy space as indigated below: t Terms: Check with order. SIGNED.................•------------.....----.....--------....................•--•...... COMPANY---------------------........................................................ .......TI'I"LE .......... ADDRESS ........... DATE...............................................I9 . M T5 PRESIDENT A. L. PORTER R. F. D. NO. 1 RURAL RETREAT, VIRGINIA 1ST VICE PRESIDENT STANLEY R. HAGUE, JR. CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 2ND VICE PRESIDENT C. H. ZEHMER MCKENNEY. VIRGINIA SECRETARY C. H. MOON WARMINSTER, VIRGINIA TREASURER C. A. UTZ BARBOURSVILLE, VIRGINIA IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT H. L. BRANKLEY SKIPWITH, VIRGINIA DISTRICT MEMBERS OF EXECUTIVE BOARD FIRST DISTRICT M. T. GRUBB HUDGINS, VIRGINIA SECOND DISTRICT GEORGE W. MILLER II27 LILAC AVENUE NORFOLK, VIRGINIA THIRD DISTRICT IRVIN G. HORNER ROUTE NO. I MOSELEY, VIRGINIA FOURTH DISTRICT W. H. STORY CAPRON, VIRGINIA FIFTH DISTRICT B. M. BECKHAM. JR. ROUTE NO. 1 DANVILLE, VIRGINIA SIXTH DISTRICT DR. W. O. TUNE BROOKNEAL, VIRGINIA SEVENTH DISTRICT J. M. MCLAUGHLIN MILLSORO, VIRGINIA EIGHTH DISTRICT W. W. WOOD EARLYSVILLE, VIRGINIA NINTH DISTRICT T. E. TABOR NEWBERN. VIRGINIA TENTH DISTRICT M. W. FOX R. F. D. NO. 2 VIENNA. VIRGINIA Organized "To Preserve and Improve Local Governmenf' TELEPHONE 3-3146 Dear Fellow Supervisors: !r FIELD SECRETARY W. B. SPECK 302 COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 4 May 5, 1955 ATTORNEY S. PAGE HIGGINBOTHAM ORANGE. VIRGINIA The County Supervisors of Virginia will again join with other local officials of the State in sponsoring the Local Government Officials' Conference to be held at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, August 29, 30, and 31. Registration for the Conference will be held on Monday morning, and the program will end at about 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday. You will receive additional information from time to time concern- ing housing accommodations, meals, and other local arrangements at the University. As in the past, our Field Secretary, Bill Speck, will be working with the group at the University to arrange a useful and interesting program. The program chairman.of the various associations have al- ready had a preliminary meeting with representatives of the University of Virginia, and I urge you to send to Bill any program suggestions that you might have. The State Compensation Board will share in reimbursing those attending the Conference who are compensated by the State and the county for expenses actually incurred not to exceed $40.00. For most officers this is adequate to cover expenses connected with the meeting. Several months ago you received a copy of the proceedings of the 1954 Local Government Officials' Conference. Enclosed in this letter is a financial report covering the receipts and disbursements of last year's Conference. Again, may I remind you of the dates, August 29, 309 and 31, and urge you to attend this important Conference. Sincerely yours, r, . -Z. ea, 1�, A. L. Porter President M RECEIPTS AND DISBURSE14ENTS LOCAL GOVERiEM OFFICIALS' CONFERENCE Held at the University of Virginia August 23, 24, and 25, 1954 Receipts Registration Fees, 426 @ $5.00 $2,130.00 Meal Tickets Sold 1,124.00 Picnic Supper Tickets 742.00 Total Receipts $3,996.no Disbursements Expenses of Speakers 339.91 Catering Costs Meals $1,129.00 Social Hour (food) 148.16 Picnic Supper 818.4o 2,095.56 Expense of Extra Staff 143.70 Cost of Proceedings Printing 946.20 Stencils 20.00 Postage and Envelopes 115.08 $1,081.28 Extension Division 319.50 Miscellaneous Replacement of Broken Dormitory Door 50,00 Photography 88.00 138.00 Total Disbursements $4,117.95 DISBURST110,1TS OVER RECEIPTS $121.95 You will notice that receipts for meal tickets and for the picnic supper are balanced by expenditures for those two items. Thus, all other expendi- tures are defrayed by the receipts from the registration fee. This statement does not include the contribution made by the University of Virginia, which includes the time of the staff of the Bureau of Public Administration, traveling expenses in connection with organizing the program, and the cost of tying and mailing the advance announcements of the Conference 111W `40 VI1omIA: At a aaeetiaeg of the Ple=iag CammissIOU of Chesterfield Coultye held at the Courthouse On May 49 1955s at 7s30 pcan Presents Mr. Re Plaimay Sawaars, Chairman Mr. Ceeail Belcher Mro Dave Re Grenoble Mro Re Pe Raglan Mr. T*AoKeok o axe. Mr. Z op oomt sr Mra MeWBurmtt, Secretary After considerable dissuasion on the past twelve months work and on motion of Yre0unters seconded by Mro look, it is resolved that this Cowdselon, adopt the report on the Mentor Plan which is an fO110 rs: At the request of the Board of Supervisors of t08teartield County, the Planning Ccomlesion has made a study of existing moniaag ordinances and amadments t2arsto, for the purpose of aUggeoting further amsadmeats9 extensions and chaaage9se, After a wnprehensive i.uvestigatlas► of these problem, the Comissi.oat has concluded that it is not practicable at this time to exact oast all-inclusive zontat ordinance, rezoning lsrge *mesa The Commission feet,, however, that a saaiag plan, as M parr of a Coaoty Master Plan should be adoptede Such a soniag plans if adopted, should hereafter servo as a blueprint and guide for the Board of Supervisors in the disposition of all future sowing O,pp71seat ions o In conformity, with these conalusionso the Planning Cams; sioah, at its meeting On M r ha 19556 by unanim vis vote, of those attending adopted %be follow1fig preamble and resolutions Whoresee the C.hasterfield County Planning CommUsian has made careful and acaVrehsnsive surveys and studies of existing soaiag regulations and probable fracture ohasages of such reguletioaaw within the County, and has conducted public hearings and has hoard expert w1tasessew public officials and interested citizensg who expressed themselves ocacenting the need for planned waing; and Waryaa4o the Camae34810a is of the opWOA that a Master Plan for the County should be developed and thata though saah a Master Plan se a whole cannot be adopted at this time, neverthelses,es the waft of maiciag the vholo Master Plan progresses, a part or parts of ,such plat should be adopted from tins to tine; and Wherooss the Commission is farther aoarlaeod tkat the concluded work of its zoning studlea, evidenoed by maps and charts, should be considered a port of a County Master Plan; Now, Therefore, Be it Resolved, 'that the naps approved by this Commission in its zoning studio be, and the seine► hereby are adopted as a part of the Chesterfield County Master Plan; that each page of said maps shall be identified by the stapp of the Commission, to which shell be affixed the signature of its aecrertary; and m m Be it PurtbAr Resolved,, that the pae of the Qwterfield Cindy itaate7r Plan herelaebovs, adopted,, be designatod an Part Z, 7AniAgo and that s oopa of euoh Pery i,, Zftift be tmd the *am hereby is eartiflod to the Hoard of ftper+risorz of Chesterfield 0ountyg Viminu Copy 0- Test* soret $27 V IFMIA B At a SWUM M of the P14=1139 Coma3sai6a of Ohsatevfield Cotmtrs held at the Coart cuo oa X47 4#M45. St 7s3D polo Presents Ure IL Piainey saerers 0 Chairman k„'e 08011 Belcher VX.Da" H. CaVAOble Yre R.Pr Eagles /fro T:A-UCk, Jro 'lot, Y AZ OOMAtor ,air. M.W.Buned t, Secretary on notl oa of We Boldbsr & seaonded by Mr. Bt3e sq the follmsina rsowaadatioat ate ad4)Aedt 1p The omm, sign urges that the areas designated in the attaohed ovoria$s be rezoned immediately, for the "anon that the" weat are svbjedt to wee that requite dmflatte awning. It will be acted that most of the lent! In this oatega' is AOW belsg wed for subdivisiaaa purpaeso as It is Us opiaiom of the CWa1WdOA that b6A4sfWt% WW DW subdivision should not be tentatively appro"d wt#il the awe it comprises in toned to *WOra with the pra}xmsd I" o 3o The Comodseioa suggests+ that all aEpplioatiomt to tic Board of 8uper,visors for s onimg amendments, ezUralws op ehaftu be vatarred to the Planning C- mreiselca, by the Board of 8UPrrisaxst fW its reeamondation s before final deeis iou 1s nude by IM Hoard. Such prooedure wo►uId help the devalopmem% of the Raster Plan of the County sad would, it is bellovedg "IJL eve the Board of 69"rri801a Of MAY Of tba ai90-40ASUMUS %A1 IL94s 2W 1WOkrd is the prodet Ing of zoning applicaticam e 9. The Cosa lasiosa suggests that oomridirattoa be givot to the present mutigg 03.sasiaki0e910sus with the thought that additioma moms$ elassifiastions mar be neoeseary to insure orderly dervelopasnt eatd proper use of land I& tbs County, 3o The ssitsx ; recomems that an all PrSmeary roads Ue aerie maid busicteas areas be a miulmm of 308 feet is depth sod thst whmnrve r a right of gray is ehaaged due fc the reloodlem of a goads 09A the reaonmeudatiw for business smug be a slalmm of 300 meet In depth iron the now right of wear* A Copy: matt - Se+oratssy M M MU]H LEMAN & KAYIH O E, INC. Contractors A.KENTON MUHLEMAN SOS EAST FRANKLIN STREET PRESIDENT RICHMOND 19, VIRGINIA WILLIAM F. KAYHOE SEC'Y.-TREAS. April 29, 1955 Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County Chesterfield Court House, Virginia Gentlemen: MARION S. BOISSEAU VICE-PRES. ETHEL W.RYERSON ASS-T. SEC'Y.-TREAS. With much interest we noted the announcement in the paper this morning of your decision not to change the definition of the word "Subdivision" in accordance with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. We are in full accord with your decision and want to thank you for taking the positive position in reference thereto. We feel that the isolated cases which the Planning Commission was attempting to eliminate were in reality not done by progressive developers or property owners, but by individuals. The change in definition would certainly be more detre- mental than the over-all application to the greater number of people. Thanking you again, we are Very truly yours, MUHLEMAN & KAYHOE, INC. WFK:HT William F. Kayhoe I.: I T (11 1�i.�>. CON 1'RACITOR April 29 - 1955. Mr. Irvin G. Horner, Chairman Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County, Virginia. Dear Mr. Horner - I want to congratulate you and your Board on their stand in regard to the subdivision act. It is gratifying to know that we have people in public office who recognize the right of property owners. Some of the regulations that have been proposed to regulate people who own land, it would appear that they are totally unqualified to handle their property and the State must do it for them. Good planning and regulations are justified and needed, but where a regulation takes away the rights of people to such an extent that they have no control of their property seems to be very unjust. EBW:S. Very truly yours Eugene B. West. CORPS OF ENGUMORS, U. S. ARIN OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ENGINEER NORFOLK DISTRICT FOOT OF FRONT STREET NOPFQLK 1, VIRGIMA 28 April 1955 PUBLIC NOTICE On 23 "_March 1955, the Secretary of the Army approved regulations per- mitting the closing of drawbridges to navigation during major disaster or civil defense emergencies b,r the proper civil defense eeauthorities, utds on ies, The cal mil regulations have been adopted to meet the planning from urban areas. They are as defense authorities for rapid evacuation f 01 laws Pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the River and Harbor Act of August 18, 1894 (28 Stat. 362; 33�U.S.C. 499), section203.1(Cofedraw- of Federal Regulations) is hereby prescribed tooperation bridges for certain periods determined -to be in the interests of public safety by the proper civil defense authorities during a major disaster or civil defense emergency, as follows: 203.1 General. Dravrbrid.ges across navigable waters of the United States will not be opened to navigation for certain periods determined to be in the interests of public safety by the proper civil defense author.- ties during a major disaster or civil defense emergency Indicated by the military condition of warnings YELLOW (i.e., attack by Y probable) or RED (i.e., attack by enemy aircraft, J=rn inent) notwithstaxld- ing any general or special drawbrxz�dgeeortofore or drawbridges.eafter prescribed for the operation of y such These regulations will be in full force er�.sterd effect vLererpublishedays in after their publication in the Federal Register, the Federal Register on 12 April 1955, T:otice of their approval eisin the ing distributed to all Down Interested parties, and will be p press and posted at post offices. R. B. VIARREY Colonel, Corps of Engineers District Engineer CENTURY, PETERSBURG *00y PALACE, PETERSBURG ALBERT BERNSTEIN. DISTRICT MANAGER BLUEBIRD. PETERSBURG ll T�ealres REX. PETERSBURGei Uorhood REGENT, COLONIAL HEIGHTS BEACON. HOPEWELL. P. O. BOX 709 BELLWOOD DRIVE-IN, PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA PETERSBURG PIKE may 7, 1955 Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County Chesterfield County Courthouse, Virginia Untlement PHONE REGENT 8-7402 It is requested that permission be granted the BELLWOOD DRIVE -INN THEATRE on Petersburg Pike to have an aerial pyrotechnic display on Monday, July 4, 1955. It is understood that if this permission is granted, we will make arrangements for Fire Protection with the Fire Department. It is further understood that the Fireworks will be ignited by a competent and responsible person. It is further understood that when the Fireworks arrive in Richmond, we will secure a permit from the Virginia State Police to transport the Fireworks from Richmond to the Bellwood Drive -In Theatre on Petersburg Pike and Willis Road. If there are any other conditions to be met, please met us know. Thanking you in advance, I amp Very truly yours, ALBERT RNSTEII'� District Manager THE SEVERAL THEATRES OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP ARE OPERATED BY SEPARATE CORPORATIONS AND THIS LETTER IS WRITTEN ON BEHALF OF THE CORPORATION WHICH OPERATES THE THEATRE INVOLVED. ��-t2� /s- �a S alpz.Cc� .�o.l�� ,u�t�A...�.«��e�.,Yo �—� �rc�-e-_�.c�, �4�A. cap otic.,�ce�-�Q. a.e.� ��-d-c�-e-a..`�`� L E W I S H. V A D E N COUNTY CLERK AND CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT of the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA R E P O R T O N A U D FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1954 - C 0 N T E N T S -- Comments Statement of Financial Condition Statement of Revenue Receipts and Disbursements Condemnation Funds Depository Bonds Statement of Compensation Excess Fees Refundable to the Commonwealth of Virginia Funds Under the Control of the Circuit Court on Deposit According to the Records of the Depositories and in Custody of the Clerk 01 Exhibit A Exhibit A-1 Schedule 1 Schedule 2 Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D n cm n GIN s��SeMpERT ;L J. GORDON BENNETT AUDITOR C. P. JOHNSON, JR. JOSEPH S. JAMES ASSISTANTS To the Board of Supervisors County of Chesterfield Commonwealth of Virginia Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Sirs: 'g? . '17`1.� T 3s �1 I�� AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS We have audited the accounts and records of RICHMOND 10 April 27, 1955 LEWIS H. VADEN COUNTY CLERK AND CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT of the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD for the calendar year 1954,and present our report in the form of the statements set forth in the table of contents. The examination disclosed that the clerk had made full accounting for all funds of record coming into his custody. He is to be commended for the ex- cellent manner in which his records had been prepared. We have included in this report,on Exhibit D,a statement of the funds under the control of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County at December 31, 1954. The information with respect to the accounts was furnished to us by the banks and the clerk. No audit of these funds has been made by us, and the inclusion of this statement,which is for the information of the Court,should not be construed as indicating that the funds have been audited. The following statistical data concerning the activities of the clerks office for the calendar year 1954 are presented for informative purposes: Deeds recorded 7,002 Wills and administrations recorded 122 Chancery causes - New 200 Actions at law - New 82 Criminal cases tried 132 Hunting and fishing licenses sold 3,621 Marriage licenses issued 305 The records disclosed that the clerk was bonded in the amount of $25,000 with the National Surety Corporation as surety. We acknowledge the co-operation extended to us during the course of the engagement. CPJ. ap gd. 11 Very truly yours, STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION At December 31, 1984 Exhibit A A S S E T S Cash on hand $ 45.90 Cash on deposit with: Chesterfield County Bank, Chester, Virginia Regular account $22,429.86 Condemnation funds account 200.00 22,629.86 Total $22, 674.86 L I A B I L I T I E S Condemnation funds (Schedule 1) $ 200.00 Unclassified receipts 6.15 Clerk of the court: (Exhibit C) Excess fees refundable to the Commonwealth of Virginia/ .21,804.96 Sub -total ($xhibit A-1) $22�011.11 Unexpended deposits in suits 24.65 Depository bonds (Schedule 2) 527.26 Reserve for petty cash advance 25.00 Reserve for revenue stamps not attached 20.00 Reserve for old outstanding checks 66.85 Total $22, 674.86 STATEMENT OF REVENUE RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS Year Ended December 31, 1954 Exhibit A-1 Balance Disburse- Balance Items Jan. 1, Receipts Total meats Dec. 81, 1 9 5 4 1 9 5 4 Commonwealth of Virginia: Tax on deeds $ - $ 68,111.35 $ 68,111.35 $ 63,111.35 $ - Tax on wills and administrations - 1,887.80 1,887.80 1,887,80 - Tax on chancery causes - 226.50 226.60 226.50 - Tax on actions at law - 212.00 212.00 212.00 - Fines and forfeited recognicances - 56,619.12 58,619.12 58,619.12 - Costs in criminal cases - 48.10 48.10 48.10 - Pra,-;eeds of confiscations and - 622.88 622.88 622.83 - forfeited property Hunting and fishing license sales - 6,560.50 6,660.50 6,560.50 - Tax an marriage licenses - 610.00 287.50 610.00 287.50 610.00 287.50 - - Commonwealth's attorney fees Trial Justice Court fees - - 132136.25 13,136.25 13,186.25 - Total $ - $143,821.95 $143,321.95 $148,321�95 $ - County of Chesterfield. Fines $ - $ 294:50 $ 294.50 $ 294.50 $ - Commonwealth's attorney fees - 199.48 2,218.72 199.48 2,218.72 199.48 2,218.72 - - Land ransfer fees - Land redemptions, delinquent taxes, - 9,849.31 9,849.31 9,849.31 - penal�iy and interest Fees of sheriff and deputies - 128.01 128.01 128,01 - County police fees - 24.21 _ 24.21 24,21 - Total $ - $ 12,714.23 $ 12,714.23 $ 12,714.23 $ - City of Colonial Heights. F?.3es $ 100.00 $ 213.75 $ Costs in criminal cases 4.00 8.80 Land transfer fees - $03.30 Total Advances for purchase of revenue stamps $ 40.27 $ 140<27 $ Collections for others $ 19.00 $ 897.6E $ Condemnation funds $ 200.00 $ - $ Unclassified receipts $ 8.14 $ - _ $. C1 k f the court• 313.75 $ 318.76. $ 7,80 7.80 - 303.30 303.30 - -- --- 624.85 - $ 624,85 $ - 100.00 $ 100.00 $ - 416.56 $ 416.56 $ - 200.00 $ $ 200.00 8.14 $ 1.99 $ B.ib er o Fees, commissions, etc. $15,845.91 $ 45,957.88� $ 61,308.79 $ 39,498.83 $21,804.96_ Total receipts, disbursements $15,636.78 $203,052.74 $218,689.52 $196,678.41 $22,011.11 and balances ltalic�s denote debit See Exhibit B for details 11w C O N D E M N A T I O N F U N D S At December 31, 1954 Schedule 1 Date Page Number St le y of Case Amount 10 30 28 88 Commonwealth vs S. E. Sheppard $ 50.00 4 2 31 90 Commonwealth vs J. J. Goodrich 50.00 4 2 31 4 2 31 90 144 Commonwealth vs J. Frank Lundie 50.00 Commonwealth vs G. V. Clarke, et als 50.00 Total $ 200.00 D E P O S I T O R Y B 0 N D S At December 31, 1964 Schedule 2 Date Style of Case Amount 1 19 54 Southern Bank and Trust Company vs Roy F. Waters $ 25,00 2 9 51 Thomas J. Lafoon vs H. H. Balthour 150.00 10 3 52 Dr. Tarter vs D. D. Poe and Mrs. D. D. Poe 25.00 12 11 52 H. R. Hart vs Kenneth O'Brien 25�00 3 19 53 Bernard Siegal Furniture Company vs Blick 25.00 7 10 53 Richmond Production Credit Association vs Mazza 26.00 2 11 54 L. W. T. Bulifant, Inc. vs J. E. Curri-n 25.00 4 30 54 Commonwealth vs Edward Nathaniel Saylor 104.25 7 8 54 County of Chesterfield vs Donald Grover Gentry 25.00 7 27 54 City of Colonial Heights vs Clarence C. Johnson 49.00 7 27 54 City of Colonial Heights vs Bernice K. Johnson 49.00 Total $ 527.25 S T A T E M E N T O F C O M P E N S A T I O N Year Ended December 31, 1964 Exhibit B Income: Fees and other remuneration: Deeds $21,728.90 Wills and administrations 1,224.75 Chancery causes 2,727.46 Act-ons at law 681.50 Criminal cases 4,921.50 Commissions and fees on land redemptions and delinquent taxes 721.16 Recording lands sold and delinquents 97.71 Commissions on State revenue 4,980.00 Commissions on hunting and fishing licenses 824.86 Issuing marriage licenses 610.00 Reporting marriages and adoptions 37.65 Commissions on transfer fees 280.23 Preparing voting Last 177.12 Miscellaneous Salary paid by county: 5,945.05 County clerk 1,000.00 Expenses: Total $45,957.88 Compensation of employees: U Mrs. Petro D. Longest $ 3,600.00 Mrs. Margaret Foster 3,139,92 \ Mrs. June Burton Phillips Mrs. Elizabeth 0. Tucker 3,000.00 2,620.00 Miss Bertha W. Carr 1,965.00 Miss Frances Smith 193.00 Office: Bond premium 125.00 Postage 360.00 14,902.92 Income in excess of expenses allowed $31,O54.98 `r Excess fees refundable to the Commonwealth of Virginia (Exhibit C) 21,804.96 ��\ Net compensation of clerk $ 9,250.00 M n EXCESS FEES REFUNDABLE TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA At December 31, 1954 Income: From all sources (Exhibit B) Allowances' Compensation allowed by statute Allowance for salary paid by county Total compensat on allowable Expenses allowed by Compensation Board Total allowances Excess fees - Year Ended December 31, 1954 $ 8, 250.00 1, 000.00 $ 9, 250.00 14,902.92 Exhibit C $45,957.88 24,162.92 $21,804.96 FUNDS UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE CIRCUIT COURT ON DEPOSIT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THE DEPOSITORIES AND IN CUSTODY OF THE CLERK At December 31, 1954 Exhibit D Number Style of Case Amount Opened First and Merchants National Bonk,, Richmond, Virginia, Checking accounts: 8 1 25 Ada Irene Jones vs Jones, et al - Rooke vs Britton, e• als - Chalkley vs Seaboard - Hogan vs Hogan - R, B. Tignor vs Barker, et als Cobb, Executor vs Woolridge, et als 5 29 27 W. A. Eastman vs Fred M. Eastman, et als - Sarah Paredes, etc., vs Mary Drewery, et als Franklin Federal Savings and Loan Association; Richmond, Virginia: Sav;nge, a.counts: 1 20 38 253 R. Mall;)ry vs Robertson, Executor, etc. 7 14 39 664 Herbert Sm'th vs William Quarles 270 shares - Inves-ements: 1 20 38 270-7 R. Mallory vs Robertson, Executor, etc. Mechanics and Merchants Bank, Richmond, Virginia Cbe king ac�counts; 3 12 34 P. V. Coghill - Hatcher Comm.; vs Howlett 5 24 34 Rook and wife vs Br-*tton, et als Cobb, ex als vs Woolridge, et als W.A. Eastman vs Fred M. Eastman Now"land, et als vs Watkins, et als Supervisor of Chesterfield vs Woolridge Estate Townes, et als vs J. B. Jones, Administrator Carpenter's Executor vs Carpenter Wood vs Wood, et ais 5 24 34 F. N. B. of Baltimore vs Westham Granite Company 5 10 34 Estate of A. and J. Bryant vs S. B. Gary 6 20 34 Epps Spiers and Company vs Chalkley, et als Agnes C. Clarke vs Florence E. Leonard Belcher vs Wills and Moncure, Trustees Cheatham vs Cheatham Clarke vs Cunliffe 6 26 34 R. P. and C. Company vs Robinson's Heirs Rose J. Scott vs Thomas G. Scott ' B. and L. Turner vs Clarke Division Jacobs and wife vs Clay Gibbs vs Gibbs Moody vs Moody Perdue vs Moore R. P. and C. Company vs Pumphrey o R. F. and P. Railway Company vs Varnier Berk'y Goode vs Goode Henshaw, Guardian vs Talley Daisy B. Winston vs Helen A. Miller Poo', Comm. vs Crostiic 11 7 34 Walton 0. Snellings, Executor of Wallace Snellings Phy"_is A. Snellings Ottey, et als vs $ 104.98 27.67 1,33 2.15 5,34 . 23 2,95 220.10 355.82 4, 322.34 2, 900.00 40.51 153.04 203.28 1, 750.00 489.28 255.68 569.11 537.74 45.44 85.99 13.00 87,17 11.68 125.51 114,07 97.71 99,70 116.00 1, 172.01 69.74 19.44 59.05 29.82 64.02 30.74 101.80 78.02 87.55 2.67 1, 726.48 Continued Da?e Opened FUNDS UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE CIRCUIT COURT ON DEPOSIT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THE DEPOSITORIES AND IN CUSTODY OF THE CLERK At December 31, 1954 Exhibit D Continued Number Style of Case Mechanics and Merchants Bank, Richmond, Virginia: Concluded Cher_k'ng accounts, Concluded 4 11 5 13 50 42 Commonwealth Lumber Company vs William C, Ratcliff, et als Landon Ellio,.t, Administrator - Estate of Alice Elliott vs Huatt and Harry E. Bolling 9 10 21 6 44 47 Martha Esther Whitaker vs Arkie Whitaker, et als Gladys 7 21 48 R. Melius vs Mary E. Melius, et als Aaron Day vs John Paul Day, an incompetent Gibbs vs Gibbs 8 16 50 Ryland James Hughes vs Ethel May Royall 7 27 53 R. Willison vs A. G. Baker, et als Guss;e C. Haynes vs Leonard Haynes, etc. Savings Bank and Trust Company, Richmond, Virginia: Che;:king accounts: 8 24 36 Ice Co. Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company vs Southern Coal and/ 5 2 12 John MCP. Cooke, Sr. vs John McP. Cooke, Jr., et als Richmond Bank and Trust Company, Richmond, Virginia: Check_ng �.ccoun.. 11 20 36 Fowikes vs Watkins Sa7.,ngs accounts; 11 18 18 816 Burton vs Burton 2 24 21 818 Kennedy vs Robertson 4 24 22 820 Bradbury vs Bradbury, et als 1 14 25 815 City of Richmond vs Maude M. Smith 5 22 26 814 W. R. Gi?1 vs Martha Gill, et als 9 23 26 817 Patterson vs Patterson 2 20 51 396 A. F. M'_Sls vs Wm. H. Mills Chesterfield County Bank, Chester, Virginia: Checking accounts: 11 17 20 Ai'_ce G. Duval vs M'_;.is P. Duval, et als 3 29 26 Commonwealth of Virginia vs McClinton, etc. �;� 9 23 27 Bass vs Kesee 4 12 16 9 28 30 Buckner, el a's vs Bright Hope Railway Comppany Federal Land Bank of Baitimore vs Stephan Rehak 8 21 33 Joseph C. Drei,;o'.d vs Virginia Electric and Power Company t 7 8 38 Perkinson Vs Perkinsoa 7 8 38 Julia A. Merrit- vs J.�tlia A. 14erritt's Heirs `•. 10 1 40 R. T. Cogbii:, vs Walter Smith, et als 1 27 43 Commonwealth of Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs S. E. Shepherd s heirs et als 7 6 43 Virginia Electric and Power Company vs R. Dunbar Moore,/ 10 6 48 Commonwealth of Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Cora L. Blount, et als v 12 7 43 County of Chesterfield vs Clarke B. Swallows' Heirs 8 4 44 Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Suit County of Chesterfield vs Clarke B. Swallows' Heirs,O.F:Gates,Sheriff 10 16 47 Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Suit of William henry 1 Pryor vs Mary E. Booker 4 1 47 Circuit. Court of Chesterfield County vs unknown heirs of Washington Cox 12 22 46 Circuit Court. of Chesterfield County - Suit, Town of Coicnia_ Heights vs Cal-ie Shackelford Pugh 3 3 45 C;,unty of Chesterfield vs Richard Glass' Heirs C 3 8 45 County of Chesterfield vs Executors of Thomasline Clair % Edwards and James E. Cuthbert vs J. Graham Edwards,et als 3 16 45 County of Chesterfield vs J. K. Johnson, Barbara J. and Mary F. Fers 6 14 45 County of Chesterfield vs William Seal's Heirs 7 20 46 County of Chesterfield vs W, A. Worth, receiver of Goodman and Bowers 7 20 45 County of Chesterfield vs Ann Laws' Heirs ' 7 24 45 County of Chesterfield vs Wyatt Mason's Heirs 9 19 45 County of Chesterfield vs E. A. Belcher, et als 9 19 45 County of Chesterfield vs Emmett Elam, et als u, 9 22 45 County of Chesterfield vs Arthur Rbbinson's Heirs 10 11 45 County of Chesterfield vs Heirs of Richard Brown and Margaret A. Brown 10 13 46 County of Chesterfield vs Phil Smith's widow and heirs +.� 10 15 45 County of Chesterfield vs Nellie P. Cosley, et als 11 24 44 County of Chesterfield vs Conrad B. and Rosa L. Clarke 12 11 43 County of Chesterfield vs Francis Dunnavant, et als 5 3 44 County of Chesterfield vs W. W. Partin's Heirs 1 30 45 County of Chesterfield vs Heirs of Roberta L. Collier 2 2 45 County of Che€ terfield vs W. R, Turner's Heirs Amount $ 155.82 750.00 724.55 4.08 205.00 19.44 9.00 2,344.00 554,40 16.24 13.00 527.22 .02 321.14 11.67 113.71 386.49 277:41 93.24 101.38 100.00 261.84 430.19 99.73 10.68 213.26 1,271.75 21.88 183.96 887.58 958.82 219.16 103.16 2.59 814.38 50.00 384.19 10.32 844.41 482.72 144.87 686.92 8.95 292.30 8.00 210.80 74.52 67,86 182.56 77.76 552.26 43.14 14.21 212,09 Continued %Aw FUNDS UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE CIRCUIT COURT ON DEPOSIT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THE DEPOSITORIES AND IN CUSTODY OF THE CLERK At December 31, 1954 Exhibit D Da Date Continued Opened Number Style of Case - ---- -- ___ Amount hesterfield County Bank, Chester, Virginia: Concluded Checking accounts* Concluded 10 5 47 Circuit Court of Chesterfield vs Suit of Everett Dodson, 12 6 46 et als vs Esther Dodson, et als Circuit Court of Chesterfield vs Heirs $ 5.05 4 5 46 of Americus Gilmore Circuit Court of Chesterfield County - Cause vs Heirs 70.75 9 23 47 of Anderson and Maria Haskins Circuit Court of Chesterfield vs Rachel ARobinson 46.86 5 20 47 . Hickman, et als 198.54 10 9 47 Circuit Court of Chesterfield vs Unknownrcuit Court of Chesterfield vs Laura B�HeirssofeLaura 59.50 Jones, deceased B. 22.75 7 29 47 Circuit Court of Chesterfield County - Cause of Fletcher F. 4 27 46 Jessup's Heirs vs Fletcher F. Jessup's Heirs Circuit Court of Chesterfield County - Cause of Anthony Kohout 2,895.64 vs Vera Kohout and Barbara Rose Kohout, the last named being insane 480.14 2 14 47 person, and Federal Land Bank of Baltimore Circuit Court of Chesterfield vs Heirs 5 12 47 4 8 47 of James Roderick Lynch Circuit Court of Chesterfield vs Daniel Mead's Heirs 862.64 113.67 10 18 46 Circuit Court of Chesterfield vs S. A. Mobley, Circuit Court of Chesterfield vs Julia Monroe'seHeirs 4 18 46 Circuit Court of Chesterfield - Cause Edward F. Mimms, et als 108.99 vs Cornelius Mimms' Heirs 25.07 9 21 51 Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, in cause of Commonwealth of Virginia and County of Chesterfield, vs Heirs of Robert Mallory 6.95 12 21 51 Circuit Court Chesterfield County in cause of Commonwealth of Virginia County and of Chesterifield vs John C. Temple, 1.10 et als 8 17 51 Circuit Court of Chesterfield in the Suit of Virginia Electric and Power Company vs William E. Goyne, et als ISuit #2V 158.45 7 11 52 Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in cause of Commonwealth of Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Heirs of 11.98 William Lewis, et als 10 3 52 Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in cause of Annie Riley Hatchel vs Heirs of James Riley 14.41 12 19 52 Circuit Court, Chesterfield County, in cause of Commonwealth of Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Heirs of 26.09 Cyrus Johnson 12 24 52 Circuit Court Chesterfield County,in cause of Commonwealth of Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Carlston 9.90 T. Crawford est. 10 Circuit Court,Chestefield County, in cause of Commonwealth of 7 53 Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Harry W. 64.53 Atkinson, et als Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in suit Commonwealth of 9 29 53 Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Unkoo�mn Heirs of 1,096.74 Lucius M. Hull 1 Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in cause of Commonwealth of 10 2 53 Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Unknown Heirs of 281.80 Washington Ford C 10 14 53 Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in cause of Commonwealth 41.b4 of Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs N.A.Johnson,et als Circuit Court,Chesterfield County in cause of Commonwealth of 12 12 53 Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Heirs of 13097 A1ber-L Dudley _ 1 21 54 Circuit ucurt,uhesterfield County, in the case of Ruffin & Payne, Inc. vs A. G. Baker, et als gg0.09 9 8 54 Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in matter of J. A. Anderson, 150,00 State Highway Commission,Virginia P. M. Cooke 11 19 Circuit Court,Chesterfield County in cause of Commonwealth of 54 Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Willis Dobson, 987.48 Heirs of Rosa Dobson, deceased, et als 6 30 54 Circuit Court of Chesterfield in cause of Commonwealth of Virginia and County of Chesterfield, Unknown heirs of 420.38 Jacob Opie 4 Circuit Court of Chesterfield in cause of Commonwealth of 5 54 Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Unknown heirs of 118.68 Beverly Perry 7 2 64 Circuit Court of Chesterfield in cause of Commonwealth of Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Heirs of Edward .55 H. Robertson Union Bank and Trust Company, Amelia, Virginia: Savings account: 1 15 41 5181 P. V. Cogbill, Executor vs Martin, et als 2, 798.43 Continued FUNDS UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE CIRCUIT COURT ON DEPOSIT ACCORDING THE RECORDS OF THE DEPOSITORIES AND IN CUSTODY OF THE CLERK At December 31, 1964 Date Opened r Numbe Style of Case Petersburg Savings and American Trust Company, Petersburg, Virginia: Certificates of depposit: 6 2 00 47762 Unknown 9__25 07 72557 Unknown Savings accounts: 12 16 42 148 M. C. Bottom's Heirs vs M. C. Bottom's Heirs 12 15 42 740 R. M. Andrews, at als va P. Andrews 12 16 42 744 Eliza J. Crump vs J. J. Crumppi/'a Admr. 12 16 42 741 R. M. Andrews, at als vs P. . Andrews' Heirs ' 12 16 42 748 J. Park, at als vs Park, at els 12 16 42 750 Debrill vs Thomas Howlett 7 12 49 5301 Annie Estelle Ramsey Chappell, Widow vs John William Chappell and Mildred Louise Chappell 12 24 48 4896 Everett Dodson, at als ve Bather Dodson, at al Bank of Commerce and Trusts (Main Office), Richmond, Virginia: Checking account: 1 2 82 W. Nunnally, et cis vs R. Nunnally, et als Bank of Commerce and Trust (Manchester Branch), Richmond, Virginia: Checking accounts: Beasley, Administrator vs W. M. Haines 1 80 12 Bland vs Bolling 5 28 12 Bottom vs Burton 1 19 15 S. J. Adams vs Earl Brooks - Clary vs Clary and Hatcher at als - P. V. Cogbill, Attorney for k. V. Clayton Dance vs Berry 8 14 18 Charity Johnson vs Richard Johnson's Heirs 11 28 25 Cundiffe vs Cundiffe Mabel J. Jarrett vs Cosby 12 20 27 Rachel Gill Dance vs J. Ester Gill, at als - Fisher vs Manders 5 29 28 Warwick vs Starke - Rowlett vs Rowlett - Varnier va Varnier 9 80 36 Shields vs Lee, et als -1 P. V. Cogvill, Clerk vs Oscar Banks 6 87 Bank of Commerce and Trusts vs B. S. Nunnally, et als 12 1 48 Cornelius P. Shields, et al vs Lucien Burke, at als v - R. L. Farmer vs Sarah Stark, et als 4 10 48 Clarence L. Brooks vs Ellen Crews Brooks 1 26 52 Leo J. Johnson, et als vs Edwyn Raymond Johnson State -Planters Bank and Trust Company, Richmond, Virginia: i Checking accounts: Prior to 12 28 22 H. M. Drewery vs Martha A. Drewery's Administrator 12 23 22 Hobson, et als vs Hobson, Administrator 12 23 22 Jacobs and wife vs Clay, at als 12 23 22 Nalle administrator vs Brander 12 23 22 Nunnally vs Martin and wife 12 23 22 S. S. and W. W. Wilkinson va Sims Forsee, et als 3 8 26 Wrigght and wife vs Cheatham W. C. Gill, 11 9 84 W. C. Gill's Administrator vs et als 2 6 42 A. S. Moody vs John J. Longest Total In Custody of the Clerk: Fonds#: United States Savings, Series E, dated October 1, 1949 maturing October 1,1959 Re; Bettie Venable Cogle's Estate: (Harry L. Snead, Executori Certificate Payee Coat Maturity Value Number C-146280890 E Mr. John Edwin Cogle, Jr. $ 75.00 $ 100.00 C-146290889 E P. 0. D. 75.00 100.00 D- 19849242 E Mr. John Edwin Cogle, Jr. 875.00 500.00 C-14HB0392 E Mr. Arthur Carter Cogle 75.00 100.00 C-146280891 E P. 0. D. 75.00 100.00 D- 19349241 E Mr. Arthur L. Cogle, Jr. 875.00 600.00 C-146280898 E Mr. Herbert L. Potts, Jr. 76.00 100.00 C-146280894 E P. 0. D. 75.00 100.00 D- 19840940 E Mr. Herbert Linwood Potts, Sr. 875.00 600.00 C-146280307 E Miss June Frances Potts 75.00 100.00 C-14628088E E P. 0. D. 75.00 100.00 D_. 1y349289 E Mr. Herbert Linwood Potts, Sr. 875.00 500.00 Total TO Exhibit D Conc3vded Amount $ 98.51 11.50 110.88 44.84 68.98 46.55 99.50 256.29 1, 171.77 444.68 1.85 886.10 81.73 84.00 89.00 85.38 195.56 108.78 2.82 811.81 516.61 91.82 2.00 11.51 294.18 40.37 10.12 148.69 .36 1.22 2.40 88.65 867.90 95.96 4.00 47.19 22.00 29.00 114.93 161.31 $1.61 1, 548.00 $ 60,453. 19 2,800.00 IN WATER SUPPLY SEWERAGE SYSTEMS SEWAGE DISPOSAL M 0 R. STUART ROYER & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS 15 WEST CARY STREET RICHMOND 20. VIRGINIA DIAL 7-2651 May 10, 1955 Board of Supervisors, County of Chesterfield, Chesterfield Court House, Chesterfield, Virginia. Attention: Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Gentlemen: This is to supplement and revise portions of our letter of February 25, 1955 in reference to certain engineering services in connection with the development of improvements to the water system of the County. The following revised proposal is made after discussion with Mr. Burnett at our office on May 9, 1955, as to probable areal scope of the project and to what extent engineering services may be required. The area we propose to study is generally circumscribed as follows: The entire eastern section of the County as: bounded on the north and east by the City of Richmond and the James River and on the south by the Appomattox River and the City of Colonial Heights. The western boundary will be approximately: State Secondary Highway Route 673 from the James River to State Primary Route Alt, thence generally westward to include Midlothian and back to Route 653, thence along Route 653 to Route 604, along Routes 604P 10, 625, 600, 628 and 669 to the Appomattox River. The area above outlined is approximately 200 square miles. We propose to make a comprehensive study of this area, to include all the items as enumerated in the attachment to our letter to February 25, 1955 on the basis of actual personnel cost, plus 75 per cent overhead plus 25 per cent profit on personnel costs and overhead, but not to exceed a total of 425,000. We will furnish the County ten (10) copies of such report. For design, preparation of plans and specifications, contract documents, et cetera, and for general supervision, we propose the REPORTS DESIGNS APPRAISALS n M Attn.: Mr. M.11, Burnett Page #2 May 10, 1955 following fees: Fee - % of Construction Cost Pump Stations Construction Filter Plants General Cost Intricate Design Pipe Lines Supervision $ 25,000 or less 8.40 6.72 2.10 50,000 7.84 6.27 1.96 75,000 7.52 6.02 1.88 100,000 7.20 5.76 1.80 200,000 6.56 5.25 1.64 300,000 6.08 4.86 1.52 400,000 5.84 4.67 1.46 500,000 5.6o 4.48 1.40 600,000 5.48 4.38 1.37 700,000 5.36 4.29 1.34 800,000 5.24 4.19 1.31 900,000 5.12 4.10 1.28 1,000,000 5.00 4.00 1.25 Where the estimated or actual cost of the engineering work falls between two of the amounts listed in the fee scale, the percentage fee to be paid shall be interpolated between the aforesaid amounts. Should all of the work as covered in the report be authorized for design at one time, then the County will receive a credit for the full amount paid for the report at the time of payment for such design in accordance with the above schedule. Should only a portion of the work covered by the preliminary report be authorized for design or the project designed in two or more stages, then the fee for each portion or stage of the work shall be based on the construction cost of such portion or stage. In such ease, a credit will be made in the fee for an amount paid for the preliminary report in the ratio of the amount of work authorized to be designed to that covered in the preliminary report. Should design of all or any portion of the work be authorized and then at the completion thereof for any reason the work is not let to M M Attne., Mr. M.WO Burnett Page #3 May 10., 1955 contract within 60 days then the fee shall be payable and shall be based on the estimated cost of the work and adjusted in accordance with actual cost when construction contract is let* The above figures do not include resident supervision of construction. If resident supervision of construction is desired, we will furnish such services at actual salary cost plus $25-00 per month per man to cover insurance, Social Security., et cetera. Should the County so desire, it can provide its own resident supervision. General supervision fees are shown in the preceding tabulation. This portion of the fee is payable monthly in proportion to the progress of construction. The above fees do not include surveys for real estate acquisition or rights -of -way but assistance will be rendered as to property to be acquired. It is our understanding that the Engineers will have available to them any information in the hands of the County pertaining to the problem at hands We would like to handle this work for you and if awarded the commission assure you of our full cooperation to the best interests of the County. We agree to push the work so as to relieve the presently critical points as soon as possible* Respectfully.9 R. Stuart Royer & Associates By: Edward H. Ruehl GOOD WIN PLUMBING CO. We Sell - Seu-&e "d 9ndtull PLUMBING, HEATING AND APPLIANCES 721 WEST BROADWAY PHONE 861 RES. 3501 HOPEWELL, VIRGINIA May 21, 1955 Chesterfield County Offices Chesterfield Court House Virginia ATTENTION: Mr. Burnette Dear Sir, Recently, I applied for a building permit to repair the old Eyler Store, on the Hundreds Road. In order to do a good job, I found it necessary to tear down the East section of the building and rebuild same. It appears that the building is about 21 too close to the Hundreds Road to comply with the present building code. In view of the fact that the building will remain the same distance from the road, as before, and is being rebuilt on the same foundation, I hope that you will see fit to request the Hoard of Supervisors to permit me to vary from the code and proceed with the work, as planned. Yours truly, i Le B. Goodwin "IS AOUWWO %bj# the W . "Y of Party or tb* first P • h '*lmftor mt*rv" to as Itho 10"m- slog of WA Staup POM' of wo parts hornets r mf to as tho ecow*y- MTNA8TS ► he " .COMMY# tx'WM of lMd to Into TIUMPe O the s"OS of +"d a tft4 t 4rO *010 by a Ti tt rc oO rd d to PlU ftok in The * arti a of tho aft QOW% Of "Id Countyl V vqvlT syst to O*m tU am e los" s"A tie nett$ md ter "+ subdIVILSIfto hex deressoA o" "t or the VAS Of Oft ftLlw (41040) In *0 Oath to tho ovors, tho pertlof bers" do Owwomat &A Op" as Ths 1 • n of vw emu" or a pormis by tit comtT to 00 the "astmetion O stem AMA vw "Oration 0" of a" systm by 'tom domft3r mfl *r the U%Wferr * fAIM as )"Wotmeflor mot farms, the oorpo us"* vout pmp has to r in WXI1TT t r emosto met twth by fly .. �#.. ► ♦kAwA mwb&A "mw* ► .k ul 1 U. 4. polo" A~ ; how` Perioc, Tho said,to 1 ' Owl �,O s aoxdawo with 041flowA*i for" by the %r* Tho diis to boft 4e sit SAS* line or At PIOUMSILO took.of to roqwtrod by tho jVM6 °` , ► 4 M"W c ;fit vork sk&U bo or A.tu . of torte is ftwoved by uw ftwoy or Its 44Y OMWrlsod 0 In Pod - oftditUm "d gAw or sv. tber la" UP" 1wouis 0. AfVw o d r IStbo 01 of*. tb# *tar 44U bwvo owasslv*two ud soutovaOver , o ls"*r MM r~ *Ad At sho 'duo at bet 1 *t sb# + �► o AU ��41 l6ligto hr toy Us 64 to ponsittod 040007"d b7 tb4l ORMOY Md no s o"A to rower", . . r hour of tho ftb"VU"k kom os N*mom v"bytu " wi .. ,,! `i-.,�.�,.e �.=:�W►.. �'+�e:,. ri.Y.,r.i..ti.....s rarw:'..w.,...�. .a.. _.. .�.... �* o 40, • VAW tw It an "r Of sir iscow*s +t y in so 1W smbs a► r # # follum duo to i s sp�tsl,1'Y��r�s ; raesie ► in in—mo i is *ay s is Ies bobW by its -pft"ant > M a by Its am eismou*tits" f*r bs t. s Of or ftorviews im its hors s "to"" by JK* 1t* tf4* Its Got** Attost►s CUT Of * Wit; lb J2,1 `III/ 1* 400 COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IRVIN G. HORNER, CHAIRMAN CLOVER HILL DISTRICT M. W. BURNETT RAYMOND J. BRITTON EXECUTIVE SECRETARY MANCHESTER DISTRICT ROBERT O. GILL MATOACA DISTRICT HAROLD T. GOYNE �.{ BERMUDA DISTRICT April 279 1955 .TAMES P. GUNTER MIOLOTHIAN DISTRICT STANLEY R. HAGUIC, JR. DALE DISTRICT Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Chesterfield, Virginia Gentlemen: A conference was held at the Richmond Quartermaster Depot on Apt- 5. 1955 at the request of the District Engineer, Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District. Enclosed herewith is a resume of this conference, in- dicating the various problems discussed. The purpose of this 1 tions of Falling Creek. Since as one of its sources of water in the cost of constructing an upstream above the County's Fa determine the flow of water in area. Mr. Don Wallace, who ho was present at the conference* would share 50% of the cost of onference was to discuss stream flow condi- the County of Chesterfield uses this stream supply, the County is being requested to share operating an additional stream gaging station ling Creek Reservoir. This gaging station will o the reservoir from the Falling Creek watershed do the U. S. Geological Survey in this area, It would be his. recomendation that the U.S.G*So operating this stream gage station. The Richmond Quartermaster Depot is taking the necessary steps prior to constructing a new stream gaging station just East of U.S. Route 1 on Falling Creek. The total cost of this stream gage station would be paid by Richmond Quartermaster Depot. With the present gaging station located near the Chesterfield County Filter Plant being retained, a complete picture of all flows in Falling Creek would be obtained. With the raw water situation being what it is and the proposed ex- pansion that is now under consideration, it is recammended by the writer that the Utilities Department share in the construction and operation of an addition- al stream gage station as indicated in the attached sketch. The County's participation would be in the amount of $887.00 for the initial construction outlays and $262.00 per Year for the cost of operation. If the Board of Supervisors so desires, Mr. Don Wallace of the U.S.G.S, has stated that he would be happy to appear before the Board to present their view points on this matter. With the critical stream flow season now at hand. I would appreciate your early comment. Very truly yours, George D. Shropshire County Engineer GDS :tad Encl. - 2 WNU P'•nPCLSu�� .9�'1 L�,�}`-. T.4 Tla.<�U G•✓'r4.C.,e. /l I�. r-i 4.1 r / & S co., Y,�. •C0PI n Q2EX n C2EX QMDRE 671.1 SUBJECT: Water Supply Problems on Falling Creek TO: Commanding General HeAdquarters Second Army Fort George G. Meade, Maryland ATTN : AIA.ENEU 6 April 1933 1. Transmitted herewith for your information is the resume of a con- ferenoe held in this office on 5 April 1955 at the request of the District Engineer, Norfolk District. In view of Paragraphs 10 and 11 of Inclosure 1 and the cooperative attitude that was evident on the part of the Chesterfield County Engineer, it is recommended that final legal action against the County of Chesterfield be deferred. 2. Information pertaining to the availability of funds for the con- struction and maintenance of gages referred to in paragraph 8 of Inclosure 1 is requested. 3. Mr. Wallace of the U. S. Geological Survey Office in Charlottes- ville expressed a possibility that the existing recording gage located below the County dam may have to be abandoned. This may be necessary as a com- bined result of insufficient funds and because this station no longer serves the purpose for which it was originally established. However, in view of probable legal action with the County of Chesterfield and an increasing de- mand from water users located between the Depot dam and the dames River, it is recommended that steps be taken immediately to provide funds for the con- tinued maintenance of this gage and the construction and maintenance of an additional gage referred to in paragraph 6c of Inclosure 1. 4. A request for the stud referred to in paragraph 9 of Inclosure 1 is being prepared and will be submitted for necessary action. Approximately $59000.00 was expended during the summer of 1953 to remove accumulated leaves and silt from the Depot Reservoir. From all indications, this clean- ing operation will have to be repeated during the near future unless other steps are taken to insure the impoundment of an adequate supply of water. FOR THE CCMb1NDING OFFICER: 1 Incl- Resume of Conf (in dup) R:(BEBT A. EVANS Capt., C.T. Post Engineer Copies furnished District Engineer, Norfolk District U.S. Geological Survey, Charlottesville, Va. Mr. Geo. D. Shropshire, Engr., County of Chesterfield, Va. WATER SUPPLY PRtBLEHS ON FALLING CREEK 1. A conference was held in the office of the Post Engineer, Richmond Quartermaster Depot, on txesday, 5 Apt 1955• Present were: ,George D. Shropshire D. S. Wallace D. F. Dougherty R. R. Barton H. J. Fine R. E. Peters Engineer, Chesterfield County U. S. Geological Survey U. S. Geological Surety Engineer, RQMD Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers 2. Water SunD3.v in summer of 1955. The amicable relationship between the M needs of Chesterfield County and RQMD was satisfactory in supplying the water needs of RQMD after the opening of a valve in the Chesterfield County Dam, thereby permitting a downstream release of water of the order of 250,000 gallons per day. Those present agreed that a similar operation would satisfy the requirements during the sm mer of 1955, The Chesterfield County Reservoir will release downstream water required to meet the needs of the RQMD barring a drought of unusual. proportions. It is believed that this arrangement should prove satisfactory until more firm commitaents can be crystallized for the ac- complishment of the construction of gages and other suggestions which follow. 3. F"uosed County survey of water sunnly reguirements and needs. Mr. Shropshire indicated that plans are underway by the County to hire a firm of engineers to study the future water supply requirements of the County and methods of providing the needs. This will include a study of the Falling Creek watershed. It is expected that the study will be initiated in may 1955• An effort will be made to have construction of additional water supply faci- lities underway in the spring of 1956. 4. It is anticipated that the firm of engineers will give due considera- tion to the needs of downstream water supply users such as RQMD. Mr. Shrop- shire expressed a willingness to the engineers of RQrM to keep thew informed on the progress of the study and of the findings thereof. 5. Construction and maintenance of gages. Mr. Wallace indicated the need for a gage on Falling Creek upstream from the County Reservoir in order to determine the inflow to this reservoir. Some discussion ensued relative to the continued maintenance of the existing gage downstream from the County Reservoir and also a gage below the RQMD dam. 6. Information from these gages Would make it possible to ascertain the following: a. Falling Creek gage upstream from the County Reservoir, plus a few low water measurements on Pocoshock Creek, would enable a determination of the inflow to this reservoir. *10 b. Falling Creek gage downstream from the County Reservoir fur. nishes dat; as to the outflow from. the County Reservoir. c. Falling Creek gage downstream from the RQMD dam would furnish data as to the outflow from this dam. 7. Mr. Shropshire was of the opinion that the County is primarily interested in the gage in paragraph 6a above. RAID is primarily interested in the gages in paragraph 6 b and c above. Mr. Wallace was of the opinion that the existing gage in paragraph 6b above should continue to be maintained. All agreed that all of the gages referred to above, because of the large invest- ment in funds and increasing complexity of water problems in the future, are desirable for a complete analysis of the water situation on Falling Creek. 8. The following distribution of construction and maintenance costs, based on estimates prepared by the U. S. Geological Survey, are recommended for the gages referred to above: Allocation of Cost Gages USGS County R2M Total Gaging Station above RQMD Dam a. Cost of construction and lst year's main- tenance $887.00 $887.00 $700.00 $2,474.00 b. Maintenance cost in future years 262.00 262.00 700.00 19224.00 Gage downstream from RQMD a. Cost of construction and lst year's main- tenance -- 20200.00 20200.00 b. Maintenance cost in future years -- -- 900.00 900.00 9. Desirability of increasing storage in RCM reservoir: RQMD indi- cated the desirability of a study to increase the storage of its data at nim- inal cost. Mr. Barton was not certain of the economic possibility of cleaning out the Reservoir. The matter will be referred by RQM to the Norfolk Us- trict for study. IW-40 M M 10. Legal Action: Those present agreed that recourse to legal action be taken only as a last resort. It was the consensus of opinion that the mutual benefits to be attained from action by Chesterfield County and RQW would be more than offset by the ill will to be generated, and by the future uncooperative attitude that will be instilled in the engineers on both sides. Furthermore, it is believed that the results of any legal action, including appeals to higher courts, would take a number of years to resolve the Case in question. 11. For the above reasons, it is believed that legal recourse should be considered only after (a) the existing agreement for the supply of water to RQM during the suemer of 1955 is not fulfilled, (b) the report of the consulting engineers referred to in paragraph 3 above does not adequately consider the water supply needs of all users, and (a) all efforts for reconciliation of future problem between Chesterfield County and RAID can not be resolved otherwise. - 3 - •� � - � .. �. �.__ k Q ------------- o�,. cr' e�son-:)e/ G�sT D/7 Qerson�C/GD3T �70( OV�I-'/�C�` i A/61 7Z To C �c C c C cal Z..vcoo 7pTd/ 2. ,; �� �r � ors �r-�t c �iG►n ,o%sue � s� cr.isVo .hasec/ on f _O.OD oeo 8 /� d t/77i 1Cc�t 7� C�GPrS/�^j r? S �'. 2ce aoo '; J�/BOG• C�;c r7cra �uoes�-vision Ive ao Sa o -. m �k/c-Am.,< S �' eci Tic.�7�•ioi7S f ��� `y cnr�� c�perris o of o� / Doo, gnea Tn c �L�c-s Au.r•, .s'�3� ors � r / n �o S�5, Coo_" �f doe 7,;7 0.7 000� c000 ¢ ZSo ca A��- J-t,� �= 4 �f7o�G evcr�.�4 On cc Goy Gci^ n/•�A �/,Ocr .s cil lria �c o 7/7 74. --4aeS PHONE 82.2344 `'%Ire►' 1140 LYTTLE & BARNES CONSTRUCTION CO. Contractors SEWERS - WATER LINES - SEWERAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS OFFICE AND PLANT P. o. BOX 4205 BELT BOULEVARD AND HOPKINS ROAD RICHMOND 24, VIRGINIA May 10, 1955 County of Chesterfield Utilities Dept. Chesterfield, Va. Attention: Mr. George Shropshire Dear Sir: We take pleasure in quoting you a price of $11,200.00 on complete installation of approximately 7,400 lineal feet of 8" transite water main alon Petersburg Pike as per Plans and Specifications dated April 12, 1955. The above quotation includes all necessary materials and labor required to make this installation, not furnished by Chesterfield County. The above quotation also includes furnishing all necessary materials and labor to drill under A. C. L R/R as indicated on plans, not furnished by Chesterfield County. Hoping that we may be of service to you, we are Sincerely yours, LYTTLE & BARNES CONSTRUCTION CO. May 10, 1955 County of Chesterfield Utilities Dept. Chesterfield, Va. Attentions Mr. Ge Shropshire Dear Sirs Wo take pleasure in quoting you a price of $11,200.00 on complete installation of apprdximtely 7#400 lineal feet of 8" trankite water meIln alon Petersburg Pike as per Plans and Specifications dated April 12, 1955. The above quotation includes all necessary materials and labor required to make this installation, not furnished by Chesterfield County. The above quotation also includes furnishing all necessary materials and labor to drill under A* C. L R/R as indicated on plans, not furnished by Chesterfield County. Hoping that we may be of service to you, we are Sincerely yours, LYTTLL 8 BARNES OONSTRUCTWN CO. n The Etna Casualty and Surety Company Hartford, Connecticut Wtwtu All Am hu il4v a lIrrattt That we, ..... L.Y.ttjt. k. Barnes - Consiruct o? .. 4 t., .. I IC � ....................................................................................... .........................Richmond,...Virginia.----••----•-----••--•-------........-----..............----..........................................---•------------...........•-- as Principal(s) (hereinafter called the Principal), and THEfTNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, of Hartford, Connecticut, a corporation of the State of Connecticut, as Surety (hereinafter called the Surety), are held and firmly bound unto ...... bibles:terfield..Uounty.--Board-.oi-Supervisors -------------------••----------------------••---- ---------------------- C,heetergiel-d---Caun4,-.-Virginia..... in the penal sum of .------A .-pAr .. cent -..of ..bidbid ............... ............................ (hereinafter called the Obligee) --------------------------------------------------• ($..... b%--of-..WA-) Dollars, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Sealed with our seals this .-••--•.............1Qth--•-.. day of .......... May ------------------------------- 19.-.SS, Whereas, said Principal is submitting herewith a bid, or proposal, for .... Coil$_fir-ructIon.-of-.81!..wa.ter.-- line extension along-Petersburg._Pike.. Chesterfield__!%=.ty.,-_Vi:rgi.nia----------------- -------------------------------------------- Now, Therefore, the condition of this obligation is such That if said Principal shall be awarded the contract which said Principal has proposed to undertake, briefly described above, and shall, within the time allowed after notice of such award, enter into contract pursuant to such award and give bond for the faithful per- formance of the contract, then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. Provided, However, That this Bond is issued subject to the following condition: The Surety shall in no event be liable for a greater amount hereunder than the difference between the amount of the PrincipaPs bid or proposal, and the lowest amount in excess of said bid, or proposal, for which said Obligee may be able to award said contract within a reasonable time. ...............................................................---(SEAL) ' �� R NWAO03_RX PD COUNTY ENGINEERS TDNW _HAMPTON VI R 10 752AME OF F I CE=S" . 1 m TELEGRAM RECEIVED 10:35 A.M., MAY 10, 1955 WE PROPOSE TO INSTALL 7,400 FEET OF 8-INCH WATER LINE ALONG WEST SIDE OF ROUPE 1 IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AS PER SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUM OF $24,200.00. BID OPENING 9 A.M.. MAY 10, 1955. SIGNED: W. H. Wright WRIGHT PIPE LINE AND CONSTRUCTION CO. 1925 KECOUGHTAH ROAD HAMPTON, VIRGINIA. ij M M %y 9, 1955 To: Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Va. �,tr�f` lie, The undersigned, residents of Winfree Streets Bermuda. District, Chester, Virginia Believe the water service supplild to this area, by the County, is inadequate and insufficient to furnish the necessary water required for ordinary home consumption and respectfully request the Board to immediately remedy this condition# .Also, do not allow any new extensions or connections to the present supply line serving the area until the inadequate service to this area has been remedied. NAME e l Respectfully submitted this ` day of May, 1955. ►AI)I�X0 64) r '_ This day came Mr.Crump, representing Ns.S.T-Wegstaff, requesting the cl&sino' of a portion of Powell Road (Bon Air Heights). _ On motion of Mr.Gunter, seconded'.by Mr.Goyne, it is resolved xxxitkaximix that a portion of Rowell Road be abandoned.for maintenance. t. �I �I (Mr. Exec. Se.c'y . please write a letter to Mr. Y@rebea gating him a price on the improvement of a road of $588,00, from the Highway Department. Reg4est of Mr. Gunter) .� The Pv$'td6tLteEdg to&rrVirginia Dept. of Highways, TeLad. a letter from the Bancroft Construction Company, requesting the approval of culrband gutter fortes designed 18" instead of 24", same. 'to be installed in. -subdivisions in Chesterfield County. On motion of Dr. Gill, seconded by Mr.Britton, it is resolved that this Board approves 'curb and gutter with 18" lip when installed in subdivisions,in Chesterfield County. i The Executive Secretary read a letter on public landing - matter delayed o ;1 next meetinge I Mr. Britton requested the Resident Engineer for e-price on the improvement of a road off Rt.60, south side. I Mr. Britton also requested the removal of a trees on Rt. 10, which was dangerous. Also a letter was presented _from,_Mr, Jxzes R.Condrey eoncerraing work on dooks Redd. The Resident ! E'ngine.er stated that work cannot be done . on private drives, li Virginia: At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors cf Chesterfield County, held at the j; Courthouse on May 10, 19559 jj at 9:30 a.m. I, Present All members This day came Mr.J.T.Nioore, and the, Board again discussed the matter of allowing Mr. Moore to move equipment to 'a new site and drill another well in the subdivision of Beulah Village,. also allowing him to make. a temporary hook-up to the old well to supply 8 houses already gonstructed, the Lj same guarantee being given on the .aew well as on the o14. j! It was agreed that a contract approved by the Board should be signed 4. I'. by Mr.Moore, and allow him to connect 8 houses to the old well �' as a temporary measure. at 9:30 a.m. The Executive Secretary opened bids (one bid) on the installati&n of pipe line on Petersburg Pike, which matter will be taken up later in the day. • o ; This day came Mr. Biggs and other% residents of the Overstreet subdivision, near Stop 45, oft' Harrowgate Road, requesting the improvement of a road i in this subdivision. On motion of Mr.Goyne, seconded by Mr.Britton, it is resolved that the Resident Engineer and the County Road Engineer are requested to a$axag re -survey the road .in question and determine what the cost of improvement would be, one-half of this cost to be Ar �� Sj��G�CcG T 7`s %J9�tsic i T �✓ J - ! • . /fir o v v 'C /.0;/, .tea �J _ Ccv..5 1 /he,Ae,y lad lAtI14, %/7 _/Ziff d_,G..C" _ 02e griJ�fDl,/_.,f'PLdr`ad = _ t✓G_ /Nit► _ C.wf AoleGK,t -74 Qo 6;7 J '�Y Gil lNa✓�1 � �vLf�{ur� /N+�o� 1J' o A/ %y�' /tee �i•� [ � e�`� a ♦l � c ��rl % htX� ,+y�c %Y 0 0 2y,�, t lea ✓- s, Moo, 16rs►f 3s- m Ale / ✓ �r�T1`� yLto ✓S/ _ lte .SeCO1sdS'% i { lr! �tt .w .ir�, l' `t __L✓Pr,�i 7ZW Age/f'O vrr. C? / �T�-✓thy u'`.rv-`....' r I �CG -� 14'`dl(oL✓a