1955-05-10 Packet�. .0",:,,1..a ear �r�wwii,��r►
VYMINIA8 At a regular Aesting of the Board
of Supervisors of chesterfield
County® held at the Coosthowe on
May 100 19550 at 9130 aom*
Presents
Mro Irvin GoHoraer, Chairman
biro No To Coyne
*9 ToP4 UAt0r
DreRCbt ® O*G111
Xro RoJ oBritton
Mr.8touloy RXegue, yr.
This day MreToToMoo7re appeared before the Beard to again diseuss the "tsx
of obta lust a suitable supply of water for the subdivision of Bevlsh Village,
requesting the Board to allow him to maid a temporary hook-up tb the near
well recently dug which has an inadrequatO supply of water to sar►a 8 hou6e6
already constructed and sold, Mro Moore agreed that the seas guarantee
as to the voter supply and other restbiotionG be given on the proposed well
as was siren on the well recently construatedo It was generallT agreed that
a coat reat oovering the matter be approved by the Board first and Usa signed
by Nr a Mou rs, and that Mr. Moore be allowed to oonneot a maXUk= o! 8 houses
to the existing Won as a temporary measure 0 until such time as a am well
with an adequate supply of water oaa be drilledo
This day come Mro Biggs asacl others* residents of the Overstreet 804111410st
sear Stop 459 off the Harrougets Road, requesting the Board to ieWtP1'e
said road. On Action of YroG'tlys e, secas�ied by Yr.Brittcno it is resolved
that the Roeidaat USIneer and the County Road Rinser be and thay we
hereby requested to obtain prices for the isaprovement of the above described
2�0 eda
And be it further resolved that the road ru=4xg westwardly fssaa the
RarrmSate 'Road in said Overstreet Subdivision be imprwed by the
Higbr ey Department and sold cost be oba rged to ih a 31( Road Fesd or the
COUNAY
Pod be it further resolved that the foregoing resolution sathosizlsng the
highway Department to improve sold road in the Overstreet S*divisioa
be soft to the Mghway Department 'upon the payment ad' one -halt Of, the
estimated cost of %bee road by residents of said road*
This day, Chase Cosasntruotion Company, Zaoo,oaue before the Board by
Taaea W,Gordona Tro® it Attorneyo and filed its petition requesting that
the Board OkwAoa under the provisions of Title 3 ?69U-?6o2C of the
Code of VirgWa of 19509 a portion of Grindall Crank Park and more
particularly described in said pst•itions Wborsupo49 on action of Giro
Britton, seomAed by UroGunbar, it is unanimously resolved*
to That the Board do consider end act on the petition of
Caaese Conwtru:;tion Coatpaxry, Inc., at its regular meeting to be held on
June it, 1955 o
2. That the follWing notice be posted by the sheriff of the Connity
at the !rout door of the Courthouse and on as least three (3)
plea" along Land on emote or the said roads proposed to be abandoned
and that the petitioner do cause said notice to be published twice
LA the Richmond TIme,s.-Dispatch, a m uspaper having general circulation
In the "LUAU; said posting and publication to be done at least
thirty 430jdeys prior to June 146 19550
That the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County pursuant to
the provisions of Title 33-76ol3m78.20 of the Code of VirMtnia of UW
as amended hereby gives notice to the public that It Intends to eonelder
at its meetint to be held in Its aaeetiaag room at Chesterfield Conrthotaee
at 10 010lock 0a rune 149 191559 and act an the petition of Chase Construction
Qaaapanayg Inc., that the Board of Supervisors abandon She following roads
as detiaa d is sold seatione. to -wit, t
1. Gr ndall Parkway extending from the western line of Bout* No.l,
502.3.0 fast, more or leas, to the Intersection with tha>a' roar
lines of Lot 1, Block D, and Lot llo Block C, Griadall 0roak Palk,
as eitended toward each other*
8. The 20 toot access lip* Wanift northwardly from, Watkins Avenue
for a distance of 822d39 feat,, more or less, both as ohms as the
plot of Grindall Creek Ps7kv made by John H.IbIter, dated Marais 318,
1948, recorded In the Clark's Offloe of Chesterfield Coftsy is
Mat Book S, paw M and 126, on the ground that said roads here
never bees opened for t.ravdl and are not naoassary foe pablia used
This day Mr. Croup and fir. S,T.Wogstaff eassee before the Board requesting
the sbandcammt of a portion of Powell Road in Bon Alt Heights. ADd it
appearing that the sbandonmsnt of said road is r*eo=wnded by the City
planning Cosaaalssion sad the ad joining property ownerw s u#ona► copsiderstion
whereof and on motion of Mr. Guater, seconded by Nr. 0ayns, it is resolved
that the following motion be approved: Resolved that the Board of supervisors
of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, approve* the vacation, of all
that portion of Powell Road,nd described as followst
All that certain parcel or land eatbraeed within the bonaads
of Powell Road and designated on a plat dated May 39 Ifte,
as" by Chaso H. IUet end Assooiatea, Civil RAgIneers sad
Surveyors -"am Powell Road to be Closed", a copy of which is
attached to the deed from W*Tyler Haynes and Alice M* Haynesi
his wile, dated May 109, 1955, and to be recorded aimaltaseonsly
with this sesolutionp
As set forth IS a certain Instrument bearing date as., the 10th day or
fe
May 1955, esecud by !!.Tyler Haynes and Alice No Haynes, his wife, ftioh
was presented bo this meeting, and a copy thereof fildd with Beim Board*
der c3*400
-
This day Mr. 0*7oKellam, Resident Taginser, Virginia Department of HISbwaye
reported that the coat of improving Grove Road in SW=7 Doll Acre* Subdivision
would be approximately $558050a
This day tbsre arose a discussion as to the County*s requirements of
specificatiaas for cunt$ and gutters in subdivisions. And it was .pointed
out that the Highway Departm*nt would approve Curbs and gutters with the
gutter width of 18", 'Pon consideration vhweof, and on Mtioo of
Dr. gill,, seconded by Mr.BrAtton, It is resolvod that this Board doth
approve curbs and gutters with a gutter width of IS" when isastelled In
subdivisions in Cheaterflold Gou►ntyo
This day the U*Mtive °acretary read a letter from Yr. Tar West
coacenaing the public land#ngs on the West aide of the James River Md
it watt 9ensr&117 agreed that Mr. Goyne and the Rdseutive Secretary woujA
investigate this matter and report at a later metiago
This day the Mecative 3ecratary read a ]s tter from Xro Rol. Scheitlin
concerning the condition of Rt.6% ead requesting some improtemoat to •amen
It was geaslrall,}r agreed that Mr. 411am a Resident Engineer, would invasstigate
this complaint a
This day the matter of the improvement of Rto7430 commesn4 ealb d the
Burnett* Road, was discussed and it was generally agreed that Are Kellas
'would investigate this oomplsint o
This dap Mr. R.d.Britton, presented a letter fron Mro Barton Maryee
Mist Jkgtaser. Virginia Department of Highwap, which letter was is amwer
to a petitions filed with the Highway Department by Mr. Britton, which
petition called for the lowering of Rto 1 of the DuPont interseatios, at
Stop 17o Mro Mary* stat9d that in his opinion the $3000000e00 allegation
would be ourfiotent for the proposed improvemat.
Mr. Britton requested Mr. Kellam to remove a tree from the right of way
on Rt. 10, iimediately south of Snead Road.
Mr@Brit ton requesting the Resident Fueze ere Mro C. F.Kellaa, to get
a price on the Improvement of a road leading southwardly from, Rt.60e
kre Britton questioned the Eesident Engineer,, Ur. Kellen, on sme work for
*o James R. Condray of Cooks Road. lira Kellen stated that the Highway
Department could not do work on private drives.
This day Xr. Gcyns requested lbs. Kellam to bard -surface Dalavial Aweaue in
Cho a to r, the s sme being Rt. 1503. WbOr®upon Mr, Kellam, at *tad thtp the
traffic sound was not sufficient to warrant the herd=surfaeing of this road
at this tilm® 0
This day Mr- hater agala questioned Vr, Kellen conoerniV9 the cawpUtloa
of a snr W and piroPesl for closing two grade cros®ings La Hat Airs
Mr. Kenai stated that the suiloy had not Bret been conpleted, that the
Highway had received a letter from )be 161tuesr of the Boa Air Industrial
8ah0e1 tippoeiog the present p3roposseals wA offered ftaoamndattione for
cotuideratiea to be givo n to the conssoMmtion of this road fro& 30 tuft
Of US Gowttye
Ur !hotter questioned the status of the road loading wastwwaly, fz= itto #1
to the Cute ENtede in Bermuda Distriato Whereupon it was, reported that
no right of war had been found as yet and Ur Goyae, suggested Chat the
recaade be examined more closely as said road Was once a County road,
Ott motion of Xro Hague,, seconded by Dr. Gill, write usual rexolutiow
Ca Mess, In Woodbury Subdivlslcn to have same talon Sato the State Ss+oondssy
System*
Thia day-.1tv. D.W.ldurphmy appeased, representing Mrs Le R.Go ne, requesting the
ISMAing front Agrioe !tuft to General BUSLWe►o of the following dsserlbed
parcel of lands
In Bermuda It laterial DIxtrict, a parcel of land fronting 550 foot
on the vest side of the business &me lossg Rt. 01, and extending
we8tw"17 I= :teat more or leans, said parcel, being am" Rte #1
froa Chesterfleld Avenuso
T3pon ooJtsldsratioa whereof artd OR motion of UNGOynee saftaded by Mr.Britton,
It, is resolved that the eforedesc ribed parcel of land be and the s am is
hroby seyoaaed to General Business,
This day. Mrse John SaMeth came before the Bond requesting. the resoalag
!raft Agriculture to General Business of the following desoribed parcel of
lauds
Is Midlothian Magisterial District, a parcel of laud frosting
on RU340a 80 feet and extending southwerdly 800 Meets said pawoel
being 19M feet west of R*.boss
And presented letters frog Mrs &BeToombe and Mrs Wilson Tho use, which
letters stsbod that the slapers had no oblectioa to the proposed "zonibg e
Up= eoasideratioun whereof and on motion of Mro Mere seoondrd by
Mr -Britton, it is resolved atht the atbredesorilted parcel of land be
sad the Now is hereby rezoned for General Busluesso
This day 'Mrs K,K*0 •Kenna came before this Board requesting . the ressoning
from Agr1oultare to General Business of the fancying described parcel
of land
In Ustoaca Magisterial District, a parcel of land fnating
on the Aorth side of RtoMq , a distance of IN feet fad extending
northwardly 200 feet along the eastern line of Hamptas Aleauso
Cause also Nro Abram Minton, Mr. Calvin Mintoa, Ure T.H.Purcell and
Mrs* La V.1dwards, opposing the proposed rezoning, oiting the tact that
the land was uzad for residential purpor se at this time and that a
business establishmsat on. Rt o36 at thib polut would be most undesirablo.
Upon eoneiideration whereof and on notion of Dvo Gille seconded by Mro
Goya&, it is resolved that the application of Mr. lCo$oo'Benaon, be and it
hereby is denied without prejudioero
Mr. Horner stated to the Board that he was Interested in the zoning oasis
following and relinquished the gavel to Dr.Gil.l, and declared be will not
vote on the issue.
7Mia day Mr. Kontague and Mro Sykes from tha Cities Service Oil Company
came before the Board requesting the rezoning from Residential-8 to
General Business on the following described parcel of land:
In Manchezter Magisterial Districtsa paroal of land fr*ntly$
175 feet ova the Osuth aide of Rto3600 and 150 feet on the east
Bid* of Barr wood Road.
And requested almo that the appIleationfor rezoaiog tOftneral Bseiinsss
be reduced to Local Busiriesso And prevented a petition signed by sons 14
oiUMW stating that they had no obj*otions to the proposed re2ou age
Came also" Mro ProUtIoe, lira F.V$U c Weber. presenting a petition signed by
sons 41 citi.z*nx who were ambers of ReMay Namsrial Methodist Churoh
opposingeaid rezoningg and stating that the rezoning of this parcel of
land would be a detriment to the operation of the Church. Whereupon
Uro Montague stated that he had the written approval of the great majority
of citizens living within 500feet of the property in questione
Upon consideration whereof, tdrn Britton reads the following motion, which
was seconded by MroGoynee
Rosolved, that the zoning of the aforadescribed parcel of land fry
Residential, to Local Businoes, be amd the soma in bareby dsnfsde
Whereupon, lira Gunter offered a substitute motion i6loh was aaconded by
Mro Hague: Rosolvod that the pibperty in question be and the saps is hereby
zoned for Local Businesso
The vote being tgkea, tiro Gunter, Mro Hague and Dr -Gill voted. *Ay►o".
Mro Britton: and Mro Goyho voted "No':
Whereupon the Commonwealth's Attorney ruled the said motion passed
and said land had been properly resonedo
This day !dips l J.Gorman, Cams Warden, presented the game claims to the
Board® on .action of Mr® Gaunter, seconded by Dr.Gilla it is resolved that
said claims be paid as presented.
MroA.;.Horner, Forest Fire Warden, appeared before the Board citing the
fact that he had, to the beat of his ability, inspected the back puck pumps
and other materials supplied by the State Forestry Service: that the County
had approximately f4000,,00 worth of back peak pumps in.operetion, and that
since these pta w were of an intricate design that they were easily wade
inoperative"
This dad/ Mr, R.T.Brittou stated be had made an investigation of the
power wagaa presently in use by the Clover Hill Fire Departmft and said
equipaseat was in need of Some repetrf however, he recommended that this
equipment be transferred to the Adlothlan Fire Department es per their
request upon the receipt of the new power wagon for Clover Hill Fire Dept*
%*a consideration. whereat end on motion of Mr.Britton, seconded by tiro
Guatera it is resolved that the BSteeutive Secretary notify the Clover Hill
Fire Department that this piece of equipment should be transferred to the
Vidlotblan Fire Deportment at their conveniences
This der Mr. S.LoWums, appeared before the Board citing the feat that the
Federal Housing Adainiatratioa would not guarantee loans on properrty served
by private water systems and in the subdivision of Grow* Place, the majority
of lots still being aimed by Mr. Mwaa, was served with his ova water systet,
which involved Bowe 2" line and scree 10 line. a 100-681102, storage tWko
positive action pump„ and a swell of at ]*set 6-gpem capacity, And stated
further that be would like, to deed this system to the County is order Chet
he might e•v*lop the remadaing lots in sold subdivision, Upon consideration
mhereof it was generally agreed that the County Srngineer would havestigate
this well and report at the nest moeting of this Boardo
This day the budget for the year 1985-956 in the amount of VaG299203o60
which was tentatively adopted April 13* 1955, and having been duly advertised
according to law, was *gala considered, and it is resolved Cat motion of
Mro Goyne, seconded by )1r.Britton, that the budget, including all various
departments of the County as noted, bee and the gauze is hereby approved
and adopted as the budget for the year 1255-9669 with the exception that
$600*00 be transferred frog the unappropriated surplus of the General FMA
to 6b.1069 which fuad is hereby Increased to allow the eaployaant of a
part -ties deputy sherift.
Whereas , in accorumaz" with the law of the Comaronereslth the proposal
to adoptand fix levies required by the budget for zhs year IIB5.956
has been m-4* vublio, and
whereas, this day was fixed for public Hearing oa same,
vitas, Therefore, on Motion of Mr.Coyne, seconded by Mr.Britteas it is
resolved that the following general levies for the County of O"Stsrtield
In support of this budget heretofore adoptodt be, and the sew are fixed
to -wit: All Districts $2*20 for real personal property, and all Districts
40d sachinerr tsto
This dye WroleS.Molatyre of the Southwest Virginia Building Company
appeased before the Board requesting the Board's approval of some* pro -
fabricated houses called the "American Homles~. Ur. Molatyrs azplainsd
that these houses were being built in the City of Xchmond and Bsarico County.
Whereupon, Ur.Goyaq made a notion, that permits be issued to Mr. McIntyre
for the construction of the American Home in the Wentworth Hose Sites,
subject to the approval of the Building inspector, which motion died for the
want of a Second.
Upon further consideration and an motion of Mr.Goyne, seconded by Mr.Britton,
It is resolved that this matter be referred to the Building Inspector
for his recommendation end to be considered at the next meeting of the Boardo
This day the Chadraw read a letter from the Leas -as of Virginia Comtism
oitins the fact that the National Aaaooiation of County Otfloials would
meet is RIElmwssd, July 17 tharu S0, quad
Whereasp it would be nbcsseary moms enterteiAwat be given, for ties
delegates to thin Convention. it Is resolved on notion of Mr. anater,
seconded br Mr. Coyne® that this Hoard donate $1: oaoO to the League of
Vizglnis Counties to be used for this purposes
This dap the request for advertising in a souvenir progras to be wed
at the N.A.C.Oo Convention was discussed and tka matter was deferred for
further comideretiona
This der the ftecutive Secretary read a letter from Mrad.L.Porter, President,
League of Virginia Counties, ,WAS the fact that one again the loeal
governMr* affioialst Conference would be held in Charlotteovinis ant
August 296, 30 and 31st, and uxged all interested to attsaida
This dap► the Rxecutive Secretary presented a report frost the tbaaterfield
County Planning Comazisatlon on the toning studies it has been making for
the post twelve months, and presented also a Master Plan of zoning with
averlat78 showing the section of the County which should be zoned imrilately
because these areas are subject to uses that require definite wniago
Tbsre wane presented also five (3) general recommendations adopted by the
Planning Commission and addressed to the Hoard of Superrisorso
Mr. Qorns stated that the County should hold public hearings oa eaobh area
Involved before the Master Zoning Plan is adopted,
The Bzecutive Secretary stated the t tye Rester Plan as proposed by the
Lif
aing ConsUsioa was presented to the Hoard for Its consideratiea and
the Bowid, was not expected to act on said plant without oonsiderabL
and rerriaar of said Pinata
consideretioa %hereof and on sation of Mr.Coyno, ssoonded by Mr. Britton,
s resolved that thusPlan be raozlrol. *"Ith twhanks to the Pl#=Iag 4oamtssion
its sftbrts in its making*
This day tho Lsecutive Secretary read a letter from. Vublemen and Hayhoe,
and Mr-AUXAe 8. Meat complimenting the Hoard on its stand takes is
disapproving the proposed cbonge is the definition of a subdivision.
This der the 8'zeautive Secretary read a letter front lire R.go'sarrea, Colo
Corps of USIneera p Norfolk District, stating that drawbridges across navigable
waters will not be open to navigation, during certain civil defense warnings,
Thin day the Bzeoutive Secretary read a request from Mr. Albert Borttstoia.
District Jif6ager of the Neightao-hood Theatres. requesting possission for a
pyroteohaios display on Ju17 e, 1.955"
On cotton of WoQoyae, seconded by MroRaguea it is roe oked that tbis
Board grant the requested pernission to have asriel pyroteohniae display
on July 40 1955, provided the Bellwood Theater will make arrangements
for adequate fire proteatioaa, that all fire works wi11 be !,gaited by
canpetent personnel and that t1w Bellmod Drive-ln-Theater will asonrg the
nes»seery permits from the State Pollee to transport the fireworks
upon their arrival in the area to the Bellwood Drive -In Tbaate ro
This day the fteoutI" SearetsXy read a letter from Mfe Taos Y. Robertson,
which letter states that the Chesterfield County Pom ►a aXange wishes
Camp Baiter facilities to be used by handicapped during the winter months
and a aemp fbr underprivileged children in the Sumer eaMU#*
Upon consideration whereof and on motion of Ur. Haguse seconded by biro
Goyue, it is resolved that a copy of said letter be given to the Coaemittee
now st%*1zg the disposition of Coup Baker*
Sin day the Itacutivo Secretary reported that the records of the Q1ark's
Office had boon eXueisosd by Mr4T•00rdoa Bennett, Aadltor Of Public A000uats,
and a fuU accounting was made for all fuade in his austody, and acid
Agditor coaamaded Mr* Vadens Clark of Courts for the eseoalleat aWUW in
whioh his records had been prepared*
This day a request for a variantw is 'the building restrictions of the County
woo given to the Hoard by Xro Harold Io Robertson, which variance would
altar WA to build a garage 5-feet from his side Linos also them was
pareseated a written statemat frota Mr* Clarease T* Bradley► and Kro Wn, J.
Robertsoz, saying that they had no objections to the granting of this
variance* Upon oonaideration whereof and on motion of Dr. tulle
seconded by Yr* Goynee, it is resolved that a variance be granted to Mrn
Robertsos for a garage to be built not Zees than 5-166t fMK the 8100 lies
of his property at 214 Ralloway Avenue in the Villsg* of ttatoaese
This day Mro L*B.Goodwyu requested a variance which mill allow his to
make an addition, to a house facing Rte M in Bermuds Mstrteto
On motion of YrAcyae, saeca"d by greGmAer' it is resolved that this
Board great Mro L.B*Goodwyu a variance to allay an addition to a building
ehich is at present 23-feet from the edge of the road o
This dey We XoL.Reaaae requested a variance to allay the so stmet of a
garage 5 lest from his side line at 46th Street and Stockton Sttrelo
And presented a written st atemeAt saying that adjoining property mere
had no objection to the granting of this variance. On aaotioa of Urn
Britton, seconded by W*Goyneo it is resolved that this Board grant the
requested variance*
On motion of 14r.Britton` seconded by MraGoyneo it is resolved thi
the bill from the firm of Hayes, Seer Vattern and. Mattern in the
mount of $350.000 which bill is fbr a prelia+tiaary report "questing
the re9tu4y of the Sanitary District sewer uystem is the narthe=
part of the County.
on notion of Dr.Giila a aaonded by Mr.Guntsar, it is resolved that a bill
for $750*00 frM the firm of Hayes, SeayD Matters and flatters be paid,
Which bill is for the prslimivary report requcastIrg the traa 00t, of
se araee for th9 Mriok Sanitary Diatriato
on motion of Mr.8rittoa, seconded by fire Hague # it U resolved that the
Haritss Clubs of the County be enthorized to hold their annual dth of JTU1y
celebration on the Fair Grounds of the Conntya
This day Yr, George Shropshire, County Ptgin or, presented a copy of
Articles of Incorporation, for the Roanoke County Authority.
There nose a discussion as to the sale of pipe to other swdoipalitiee
and private ia►dividual.se It was generally agreed that Ao further pipe
would be sold from the► County of Chesterfield a:Bcept to a auaisaiptlityo
This day a further discussion wee held concerning the contract proposed
for Kr,I4Ta11oore in the installation of public neater in the Beulah V112890
9ubdivisioa, and it was generally agreed that this contract be aMsnMd
and again reviewed by the Board at its next Aeotingo
This day Mr,* Shoopehirea County Inginser, presented a regUest to have
instalUd a swtering station in the Falling Creek above the Goustyvs
water Inoundowt o it was generally zeroed that this matter be dsfsars+sd
for fature coulderstiono
This der again the matter of sewerage trestveat in the gttrick Sanitary
District cans before the Boardo sad it was generally agreed that the Bttriok
Sanitary District Committee be invited to stet with the Board of SVparvisors
an May Ad, low$ at 9:00 potato
This day ag oiaa the matter of hiring a Consulting Rc gim er to make a
preltalas ty report on the improvemsht of the County vat or system was
dieoussia before the Hoard, and
Whereas, the fixot of Causey and Weeks had submitted a price of $11#500*00
for the oo"lUtioa of said report.* upon consideration Whereof and oa Motion
of Mrs buster, seconded by MroBritton, it is resolved that this Hoard eaploy
the first of Caussy and Weeks to make the preliminary report of the imprr►emsat
of the water system for the price of $1.19a00oOD awoording to proposals submitted
on March 23 and Mondsed April 28e 1905o
Before a vote was taken, Dro dill moved a substitute motion as follass
Be it resolved that this Board defer actioaA on this matter until its watt
meeting, which nation died for the went of a se cond o ,
A vote was talosn on, the original mottos, which carried without a disseatieg votao
On motion of Yr.GoyneD seconded by YreBritton, it is resolved that the County
of Chsaterfleld award the firm of i yttle and Berms a contract to install
7400 feet of 80 pipe on Rto #1 for the sine of $UO2 iOa00, which price is fire
lone bid receliedo
err -10- 14
A disau.seion sme concerning the omer.genoiee oxiatjAg in the County at
this tine. Yr-Britton stated that parts of Stratford Hills, speolfically
Marilee Road,, is without hater during Perak parlour and that the County
Aunt do sawthing to avoid unfavorable paWlIalty.
Mragoyas stated that the preesure on Hinfree Street Is ultresely low
and that the Board had pmviouasly decided to replacer the line is gintree
Stresta Upon consideration whereof end on motion of Mr.Brittons seconded
by Mroftyn!$ It is resolved that the follw iug motion be, adopted. -
"In view of the pressing demands for water In certain erase of
the County:, and in vies of this tact thasta Water Bond Issue cannot be
accomplished in the near future-, be it resolved that $30e00040
be a ppropriasted from the Osnsra-R d of the County to the rater
Departsmat Caratructian Fundq wllch fined Is to be used to alleviate
these pressing demands."
It Is here mated that NvoBrIttonO Mrvo ,oyne and Xro Gunter voted "Aye".
Dr.Gill,, and U ro Hague grated "No".
0s motion of Nr.Gurate,ro seconded by .41roCoyAeo it is resolved that the miautes
of the 219t o and 28th of Apri1 be ar-d the as sae are ha reby approved.
On aaotion® the meeting le a d jou=ta)d until, ltey ago 18MQ at 7g30 pomp
JWGjr;sdm
50
TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY;
PETITION
Your petitioner, Chase Construction Co., Inc., respectfully
represents;
1. That by plat dated March 31, 1948, made by John H. Foster
and recorded in the Clerks Office in Plat Book 8, pages 125 and
126, your petitioner dedicated to public use a strip of land desig-
nated on said plat as Grindall Parkway extending from Campbell
Avenue southwardly 592.16 feet, more or less, to Route No. 1 and
also an access lane 20 feet wide extending from Watkins Avenue
nouthwardly across said Grindall Parkway for a distance of 822.39
feet, more or less, both as shown on a plat dated September 103,
1954, made by Foster & Miller attached hereto and to be read here-
with.
2. That neither said parkway nor said lane has been opened
for travel to the public and that neither of said roads is neces-
sary for public use. Further it would be impractical to open said
Grindall Parkway for travel because of the excessive grade immediate-
ly east of Campbell Avenue as shown on a plat of the contours of
said land attached hereto.
3. That your petitioner owns the land adjoining said roads and
fronting on the western line of Route No. 1 which he desires to
develop for business purposes if he is allowed to use the land
embraced within said roads.
4. That the abandonment of said roads by the County and the
use by petitioner of the land within same will result in a bene-
fit to the County and the public in that said land would be re-
stored to the tax rolls of the County as well as increasing the
CM
WHEREFORE, Petitioner prays that this Board abandon under the
provisions of Title 33-76.13-76.20 of the Code of Virginia of 1950
that portion of Grindall Parkway extending from the western line of
Route No. 1, 592.16 feet, more or less, to its intersection with
the rear lines of lot No. 1, Block D. and lot No. 11, Block C,
Grindall Creek Park as extended toward each other and the 20 feet
access lane running northwardly from Watkins Avenue for a distance
of 822.39 feet, more or less, both as shown on the aforesaid plats
dated March 31, 1948, and September 10, 1954-
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
CHASE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
ih o� V7. By
1-11 r 4/ .'e
� / le 4411
f/
RIJ 0
IA
� i a
� ° o
2 o S��•i3e.91� - �'
Iy Z oa�
o No 13
'= o�
` I • � 0 w c`-
B _
C
n
-r,
a � poi
� z
2502"
90"/S, y
�"- Se9"IS 00"2E 589'4S 00'
�
6R//V0.4L L IPA o � `w,4 Y g.
,f �, e'er •rs"oo iv v, rsi �e
2J0. 30 184.94 /0786' H
J 4�y Mca Mur � � ♦_i
� p
` o
d \
C sey^2c 4O'E JO0.26' \ �`
y °
� � a
A
0
GNESTE,CF/ELO CGUNTY B 9 o„E_.�_ �lh,
G /TY OFIS
/�/CNMONO SB9 Sp �'
v) Q
$3yyya0
A
.. 7
This day, Chase Construction Co., Inc. came before the
Board by James W. Gordon, Jr., its attorney, and filed its peti-
tion requesting that the Board abandon under the provisions of
Title 33-76.13-76.20 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, a portion
of Grindall Parkway and all of an access lane 20 feet wide located
in Grindall Creek Park and more particularly described in said pe-
tition: Whereupon, on motion of Mr.
seconded by Mr.
it is unanimously,
RESOLVED:
1. That this Board do consider and act on the petition of
Chase Construction Co., Inc. at its regular meeting to be held
on June 14, 1955.
2. That the following notice be posted by the Sheriff of the
County at the front door or the Courthouse and on at least three
(3) places along and on each of the said roads proposed to be aban-
doned and that the petitioner do cause said notice to be published
twice in the Richmond Times -Dispatch, a newspaper having general
circulation in the County; said posting and publication to be done
at least thirty (30) days prior to June 14, 1955:
NOTICE
The Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County pursuant to
the provisions of Title 33-76.13-76.20 of the Code of Virginia
of 1950 as amended hereby gives notice to the public that it in-
tends to consider at its meeting to be held in its meeting room
at Chesterfield Court House at 10 o'clock on June 14, 1955, and
act on the petition of Chase Construction Co., Inc. that the Board
of Supervisors abandon the following roads as defined in said
sections, to -wit:
I
Im
cm
1. Grindall Parkway extending from the western line
of Route No. 1, 592.1c)* feet, more or less, to the
intersection with the rear lines of Lot 13, Block D,
and Lot 11, Block C. Grindall Creek Park, as ex-
tended toward each other.
2. The 20 foot access line running northwardly from
Watkins Avenue for a distance of 822.39 feet, more
or less, both as shown on the plat of Grindall
Creek Park, made by John H. Foster, dated March 31,
1948, recorded in the Clerk's Office of Chesterfield
County in Plat Book 8, pages 125 and 126, on the
ground that said roads have never been opened for
travel and are not necessary for public use.
May 1D, 1955
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY
Im
Cm
IRIS DES made this 10th day of Way 19558 by ad between W,e TILER
HA?M and ALICE M. AA2M11 his wife;
WTTNEdSITHt WNSRZAS# the said W. Tyler Haynes and Alice M. He ,
are the ovaers of properties abutting the hereinafter described portion of
Powell Road, as shover on the Ylan of Bon Air Heights, made by W. F. Clark,
Certified ourMar, dated May 2s 1949, and recorded in Flat. Book R, page
161,Chesterfield Circuit Court, and the tar existing in said street is held
by the •fbressid parties ss the oanors of the abetting land; and
tdi M30 W. Tyler 'Room" and Alice M. 'Haynes, acquired title to the
abutting property by deed dated April 11 1946, and recorded in Dodd Hook 2960
Page 335, Chesterfield Circuit Court; and
WMUSO the parties hereto are the sole owners of land who have an
interest in said street, there being no lion creditors as defined in See -
Lion 15466,2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia;
The parties hereto are the only property owners within the area of
land shown on mob plat and reasonably needing such street as mms of
ingress and egress; sad!
WRERMI the acid street has never boon open to public use, but has
retained in undisrapted use, occupation and possession of the parties here.
to and their predecessors in title to the abutting lands, and such street is
not desirable for the development of leads abutting it or any other 'lauds in
Eon Air Heights; and the closing of such street and the vacation of such plat
to it will not abridge or destroy mv of the rights and privileges of other
property openers within the bounds of the area of land shown on the plat of
Hon Air Heights of rocard; and the Hoard of Huperrisrore of the County of
Chesterfield, Virginia, as the governitig body of that county, by resolution
adapted on the 10th day of Mays 1955, a Certified copy of which is attached
to this deed, determined that it would not be in the publics interest to ex-
EM
IM
VDWs TIMMYOUt to the and "d interest ,that they w&Y Garry out and
execute their staid desiros wW in oossiderotion of the prodeas, the said We
Tyler Haynes and Alice Me hsys"s his wits, do declare said map and plat
above speaifloally ref*rrrd to and all ether rsoords, a" and plats of that
portion of Son air R"ts to be and the was hereby is vacated and somlled
as follows
All that certain parcel of iaxed *+Weed within the bonads of
Powell Road and dosipatsd on a plat dated May 90 19550 made
by Chas. R. float lit ASse", a Civil Ugfrej, and r"Wers •-
"as Powell Road to the MomAl', a o*W of wh$ch is hereto
attached areal ssft ar part hersof.
And the said parties do rsepootftlly "Sow fall and absolute sontrols
douinion, possession and title of sad to that portion of Powell Road vested in
ow as set !'bra! abov*o
WIMSS the tbllewing signatures and toslre
STATR OF VlRt INIA
CITI OF IMCMVD# To"dtx
Is the a ersignodg a 1loW7 P+ablie of and hr the Cite afbressids In
the State of Virginia, do oert :fir that W. Tyler Rgim and AU** No Voluseg
his wifes whose naruts are sib to the tarepsing writfm;s bearing date on
the loth day of NO 19558, have aam'ob—awwwedpd the a Gees before roe in u r' uitd►
afor aside
01vea under ur baud of Mw 19550
NY *omission WTIM on the,���d+p of 19 �.
*AW
a
I, X, W. PURNMO ga seative Secretary of Th* Board of Supervisors
of the Coanty of Chesterfield Virginia, do hereby certify that the following
is a true copy of a ros*UUoa adopted by said Board at its meting held on
the 14th day of Nor 1955.
lLV%D E
That the Board of dapervisors of the Counter of Chesterfield
Virginia, approves, the vaostien of all that portion of ?*well goad, and des«
aribed as foloras
Ali that essrtsin pareel of land esbraesd within the bounds of
Powell Road and designated on a plat dated Way 3P 1955, mde
s:lr Chas. R« noot h Asss oes., Civil Lsngsr., and Surveyors -
was Powell goad to be Closed a copy of which is attached to
the dead fsrow W. Tylor Usyms and Ali** A. Raynes * his wife,
dated Key 2.0, lWs, and to be recorded sisuitaneously with this
resolution,
as set forth in a ,certain instrasent bearing date on the 14th dale of
May 1955, swoeated by w Tyler Mayaea and Alice R. Hsynes, his wife, thich
eras presented to this seems, and a copy thereof filed with this Board.
Given under m' hand thiids r of Nay 1955.
W
n
CITY W �C"MOND
".2
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
217 GOVERNOR STREET
ZONE I9
so
ip r c�H,,!'T
April 27, 1955
Mr. M. W. Burnett, hcecutive Secretary
Chesterfield County
Chesterfield Court House, Virginia
Dear Mr. Burnett:
Reference is made to your telephone conversation
this morning.
We find that the extension of Powell Road east of
McCaw Drive is not necessary for the development of the
property abutting on the east, and that the land could be
used more advantageous if this portion of Powell Road is
closed.
We, therefore, recommend that the Chesterfield
Board of Supervisors take steps to close this portion of
the road which has not been opened on the ground.
RCB:w
Cordially yours,
Garland A. Wood,
City Planner
CHE.ST��F/f11� VV7 Y
SECOiyQGPY SYs!EM
4
"Onol �
a
fir' 1460
COMMONWEALTH OR VIRGINIA
DZt'ARTMENT OR HIGHWAYS
May 9, 1955
: Mr. P. W. Snead
FROM : S. D. Crute
SUBJECT: Curb and Gutter -
Chesterfield County Subdivision
This replies to your memorandum of
to which is attached a sketch and
Bancroft.
As I understand the matter, Mr.
strutting certain facilities on
Department at the time has
that at this stage it may o
or dksapprove the design t s,
Chesterfield County to t or
However, contingent
why this Department
structed with the
and the street4ivkn
in effect. /
SDC:g
cc: Mr. C. F. Kellam, Chesterfield Res.
Mr. Kellam i bv6f the 27th
pril 21 from Mr. George E.
vate contractor con-
reets over which this
It can be said, therefore,
his Department to approve
is is a matter for
finds proper.
�Vie county, I see no reason
e s with curb and gutter con -
which is otherwise satisfactory
standards meeting the policy
/s/ S. D. Crute
Secondary Roads Engineer
m
41
%W
�'o �. �.�
�- � � �
,Z . T i� deg--/�,Ee
3, < � ¢
� 7¢3 ����
t-
�.v---F ,1,1„d�,�G ,may^'✓
a
IMMFIWI
VO
vw Xx*Ov* SO teAF to tint 4*4
ahe* 1vg b da
Sty 20 ftoroburg mks
210 24, Virgstia
*'5* 195
i a i r
ym
Bermuda r supervisor
ChOSUrfield
County
Obsours Virgin"
Bear M' saw"
f,�. !� � r 0• LA
and growim nw
i of
or
xawt no
county those boat* oft
W e'$ thevers"O,
t h*s sld county to aj
"MY a 0esa tad► to
all boats am .0po"Old
�. tt ,
aless�spr
M out Into to
va.ter
huniM s
a the MWth side of
IMUOR the Board of supordsors of
a lis am an Provide
t RIV*V bests E ly
Ubm not In user, on small
*ator edge MA in
tbo V604 "A Should
t� eater 3*v*1.
tvallor map high
you will r*400186 that tb* sale %tes motors, truUmn
' tiSMAS � ►t'� + � Mas�►ts Substantial l txw" in
their 140-0 .W, ei�r � � sad �lsas aaa� ti ►
for t It �tl� MA tax VIVOWS�' ► 1e
ids st that a l,is lands be osts I,isbad at the
a t + " � dt
at � ow just below the
�4
s is ttstt t Y~ fly a tl ubd
that � eu�i s�a�s the a be sifiiiuled for
O"Oletieft st as *a r r Wit*
'VOWS V*VYtruU40
RAP
0
J. A. ANDERSON, COMMISSIONER �'
[. P. BARROW, LAWRENCEVILLE, VA.
�. S. FLYTHE. MARTINSVILLE. VA.
i. D. MAY, TAZEWELL, VA.
•URGESS E. NELSON, Mr. JACKSON, VA.
f, W. RAWLS, FRANKLIN, VA.
H.OWARD C. RO GERS, HAMILTON, VA.
TUCKER C. WATKINS, JR., SOUTH BOETON. VA.
WILLIAM A. WRIGHT. TAPPAHANNOCK. VA.
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND 19. VA.
May 5, 1955
Mr. Raymond J. Britton, Member
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County
Midlothian, Virginia
Dear Mr. Britton:
'NIA -
BURTON MARYE. JR..
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER
R. P. EL LISON, EXECUTIVE At818TANT
WM. R, GLIDD E N, ASeIe TA NT CHIEF ENGINEER
H. H. HARRIS. ASBIHTANT CHIEF ENGINEER
F. A. DAVIS. PURCHASING AGENT
J. P. MILLS. JR.,
TRAFFIC 4 PLANNING ENGINEER
G. D. FELIX, RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEER
C. J. ALLARD. AUDITOR
IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO
ROUTE NO. I PROJECT NO._
Chesterfield County
Request for Allocation
The petition headed by Mr. J. Scott Parrish, Jr., in regard to
improvement of Route I at Stop 17, received.
As you probably know the Commission has made a tentative allo-
cation in the amount of $300, 000 for six lanes and channelization at the
du Pont entrance. We believe that this allocation will be sufficient for this
improvement.
Please express our appreciation to all signers of this petition for
their interest in our highway problems.
With kind regards,
Sincerely yours, /��
I i� p(-
Chief Engineer.
cc - Mr. Thomas Bell
313 W. Franklin St.
Richmond, Virginia
TAX�NO,TIOE
.r.rrir+�r
That the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County will on April 12, 19651
at 11:30 a.m., at its meeting room at Chesterfield Courthouse, Virginia,
take under consideration the rezoning and/or the granting of a Use Permit
on the following described properties in Chesterfield Countyt
1. In Bermuda Magisterial District, a parcel of land fronting
550 feet on the west side of the business area along Rt. #10
and extending westwardly 1350 feet more or less, said parcel
being across Rt.#1 from Chesterfield Avenues to be rezoned
from Agriculture to General Business on an application of
Mr. Roy Goyne.
2. In Bermuda Magisterial District, a 35-acre parcel of land
fronting 1155 feet on Rt. 618 and extending southwardly
1335 feet more or less, said parcel being approximately
5600 feet east of Rt. 619 on which a Use Permit to erect
a television tower is requested by the Petersburg Television
Corporationp
3. In Bermuda Magisterial District a parcel of land fronting
180 feet on the Enon Church Road and extending westwardly
280 foot more or less, said parcel being 2000 feet north
of Rt. 10, to be rezoned from Agriculture to General Business
on an application of Mr. O.K.Perkinson.
4. In MidlothianMagisterial District, a parcel of land fronting
425 feet on Rt.60 and extending acr thwardly 500 feet, said
parcel being 950 feet west of Rt. 6789 to be rezoned from
Agriculture to General Business on an application of
Mr. A. MoD. Holder.
5• In Manchester Magisterial District, a parcel of land fronting
80 feet on Rt•60 extending southwordly 191 feetp the same
being Lot 60 Block 2, of the Pinehurst Subdivision, to be
rezoned from ,Agriculture to Local Business on an application
of Mr. C.T. Johnson.
6• In Manchester Magisterial District a parcel of land
fronting 102 feet on Old Broad Book Road and extending
southwardly 670 feet, said parcel being 1500 feet west
of Rt. #10 on which a Use Permit is requested to operate
a Rescue Squad by the Manchester Rescue CgmpaW.
All persons favoring or opposing the granting of these requests -are invite4
to appear at the time and place herein stated*-
M. W. Burnett
Executive Secretary
moo° Nei
o
a
3
L
s
n
IA
44
io
r:
n
to
''`.�
n
M
T A IC E N 0 T I C E
That the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County will on
May 10t 1955, at 11:30 a,m,, at its meeting room at Chestorf ield
Courthouse, Virginia,, t4.ke under consideration the rozonin- of the
following described porperties in Chostcrfiold Bounty:
1, In Midlothian Magisterial District, a parcel of lend
fronting on Rto360, €30 foot and extending southwardly
'per S Se� 200 fort, said parcel being 1900 feet west of Rt,653,
to be r ozonod from Agriculture to General Business on
an application of Mrs, John Samoth.
216 In Matoaca Ma istorial District, a parcol of land
e of freating on the north side of 2;�3E, a distance of
100 feet and extending port; wardly 200 foot along;
the pastern lino 06 s'Iampton-,vontios tobc rezoned
from Agriculture to Goneral Business on an application
of Mr,K,KoO*Konnor"
.,,\
r �a�r
i°3, In Manchester Magisterial District, a parcel of land
fronting 175 feet on the south side of Rt,360, And
6tS',Ieai 150 feet on the oast side of Berrywood Road, to be
rezoned from Residential-2 to General Business on
an application of the Cities Service Oil Company,
1,11 persons proposing or opposing the granting of these roquos 'n
are invted to appear at the time and place herein stated,
Mo ► ,Burnett, Exec, Sec : y.
Board of Supervisory of
Chesterfield Country, ` iLr,_--* -^.:i=.i,
L4o
4A
104-
lea a -
%
L: J
n
Board Of Supervisors
Chesterfield County
Chesterfield, Va.
Gentlemen:
May 9,1955
Hall St. Road
Midlothian, Virginia
We he reby give oar consent f or the
parcel of land on Rt. 360 to be rezoned from
Agrianitare to General Business on an ap-
plication of Mrs. John Sameth.
Sincerely yours,
E. B. Toombs
Midlothian, Virginia
FBT/v
J. E. NORVELL, Jr., Agent
2606 HULL STREET TELEPHONE 82-1224
SOUTH RICHMOND, VA,
April 20, 1955
Mr. M. W. Burnett,
Executive Secretary,
Chesterfield Court House, Va.
Dear Mr. Burnett:
We are enclosing herewith our check for
$10.00 representing the fee for the rezoning appeal
to be made by Cities Service on the parcel of land
on Route #360 at Berrywood Road, which we discussed
on the 'phone this morning.
I understand that the hearing will be held
at the Court House at 11:30 A. M. on May 10, 1955•
Yours very truly,
J. E. NORVELL
BY
Thos. G. No reel l
TGN:E
O
'3
w �
REPRESENTING FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY FOR OVER 25 YEARS
An
CITIES SERVICE OIL COMPANY
PRODUCERS -REFINERS -MARKETERS -EXPORTERS
RICHMOND 15, VA.
FIRST AND STOCKTON STRUTS
May 6, 1955
To Whom It May Concern:
We, the undersigned, do not oppose to the rezoning of that
parcel of land situated at the corner of U.S. Highway 360 and Berrywood
Road, which will be used by Cities Service Oil Company as a service
station location if approved by the Board of Supervisors.
AMP A.M.A230 ON .
GENERAL OFFICE: SEVENTY PINE STREET. NEW YORK 3. N. Y.
44�
I, F. B. Montague, witnessed the signatures on the attached
petition to rezone a property situated at the corner of U.S. 360 and
Berrywood Road. In the case of Mr. Ashburn, his power of attorney
signed in his behalf.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th day of May 1955
N tart' Public�
My commission expires March 25, 1958.
n
n
May 9, 1955
We, the undersigned, request the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County to continue the zoning of the property
facing on the south side of Highway #360 in the vicinity of
Berrywood Road and Snead Road as "Residential" for the reason
that we feel that business property facing the Ramsey #emorial
Methodist Church would constitute a hindrance to safety in the
area and to the efficiency of the work carried on in this ra—
pidly growing Church of 700 members which is serving the re—
liglaus and social needs of a great number of people in the
corrmvrnitye
41
m
LL 41f
J
cm
FIRST MORTGAGE CORPORATION
CLAUDE R. DAVENPORT. PRESIDENT MORTGAGE LOAN SERVICING
CHARLES E. MOORE, VICE-PRESIDENT
W. M. WOOD, SECRETARY
T. TUNSTALL ADAMS. JR_ VICE-PRESIDENT
RICII1rIOND 14�,VIRGINIA JESSIE W. ENGLEMAN. ASST. SECRETARY
T. T. HYDE. IIE I. VICE-PRSIDENT
A. R. MELTON, TREASURER
ALEX. MCCRONE, VICE-PRESIDENT
L. R. PALMER. ASST. TREASURER
LARRY C. MELTON, ASST. TREASURER
FRANK B. AUSTIN. JR.. AUDITOR
JOHN D. BROWN, COUNSEL
CASHIER AND INSURANCE DEPARTMENT
912 EAST MAIN ST.
Mr. H. T. Goyne, Sr.
Supervisor, Bermuda District
Route 2, Chester, Virginia
Dear Mr. Goyne:
May 6, 1955 8TH FLOOR, STATE -PLANTERS BUILDING
Due to a recent ruling of the Federal Housing Administration concerning
community wells, I am writing to you on behalf of the property owners and
interested parties who live on Mason Ave., Grove Place, Chesterfield County.
This new regulation pertains to community wells and will involve any trans-
action concerning financing under FHA on any property located in Grove Place.
We have had a current request from Mr. J.L. Ellis to secure an FHA Condi-
tional Commitment to establish maximum value and loan in connection with the
sale of his property. This application was put through in the proper order and
on April 29th a letter was received from FHA which we quote herewith.
"This is to advise that your application for mortgage insurance
identified by the case number above, has been considered and it
was determined after Preliminary Examination that it does not
qualify for the reason given below:
In order that the captioned transaction be eligible
for Mortgage Insurance, it will be necessary that
the Community Tfater System meet the requirements
of this Administration, or advise us to the effect
that the water company is under the control of the
State Corp. Commission, concerning Public Utilities."
In view of the foregoing, the question arises as to whether the individual
well on the property of EL Mumma could be incorporated into the County system.
A`e believe that with the recent ruling of FHA, unless this is done all properties
in the subdivision would be ineligible for FHA financing. We believe this to be
an important issue as there are a number of vacant lots within the subdivision
which might not be sold unless financing of a loan could be on FHA basis and some
7 or 8 existing houses may have to be sold on FHA financing.
We would appreciate if you would consider this and bring the matter before
the Board of Supervisors for consideration at an early date.
Your advices are awaited with interest.
TTA j rAh
Very truly ours,
C. E. Winn
Special Heporesentative
M
TENTATIVE MWET - CHESTERFTNZ COtAQ'PY
Year Eliding Tune 30 1956
At a meeting of the'Doard'of Supervisors of Chesterfield Oountyj
Virginia9 hold on April/39 1955# at J':30 p,m, the following Ezpendituro
Fetimetos and Rovenue Estimates were adopted as the tentative budget
for the County for the year ending Tune 309 1956, to -tit:
GENERAL COUNTY ZM:
1. County Joninistration
2, osessment of Taxable Property
3, Collection and Disbursement of
Taxes and Other Receipts
4, Recording of Documents
5, Administ rat ion of Tusti ce
6o Crime Prevention and Detection
7. Fire Prevention and Extinction
8. Public Welfare
9, Public Health
10, Public Works
119 Advancement of Agriculture and
Home Economics
130 Elo cti ons
14, Maintenance of Buildings do Grounds
15, HiCbweyo Road and Street Lighting
18, Miscellaneous Operating Functions
19s Capital Outlay
,appropriation to other Local Funds
Unappropriated surplus from
General Fund
Year Ending
Tuns 30 1956
oposed�
Expenditures
DOG T,NC FW:
l2o Gotcation of Livestock & Fowl
Appropriation to Other Local Funds
Reserved for contingencies
VIRGINIA P[1l3LIC AWS ISTINCE:
8• Tublio 4 01{ ro
052l910a00
390484,00
30.;635oOO
18'500000
8 j425 =
122a519o00
26s540,00
4g800o00
19; 00c00
Totals
/,23, // 9, 00
14550000
80175*00.f /
6;250000 Glcl�•ei'
26n4,,3.0000 d
7 j80=11 R0 r s
119025000
2365OOoOO
I� 807s458o38
12 668o62
060495.00
10i000000
_,. 6,65054O.
01479840000
ETTRICK S_'1 M.MY DISTRICT OPZV21NG FLW:
m ubllc Voii5 15i580:00
Reserved for contingencies 21,420600
02,V2380350s00
147g840900
370000000
u
m
EIPMDITUM To. ols
ETTRICK SINITARY DISTRICT DEBT FUND:
20-b Interest on Bonds 01'260•00
Reserve for contingencies 32 115 0, 0 0330375.00
COUNTY ROAD FUND:
Reserve for contingencies
0369000*00 369000.00
COUNTY SCHDOL FUND:
,Administ rat i on
37 s488000
Instructions
1#482j870. 00
Auxiliary Agencies
2160700.00
Housing
232y800.00
Fixed Charges
32s000.00
capital Outlay
19962i292e00 '
Debt Service
308,82640 492720976.50
COUNTY UTILITY OPEWJ!ING FUND:
'
Public Works
071a500.00
Appropriation to Debt Fund
1060018*75
Appropriation to County General .
Bind
30i000.00
Appropriation to Construction Fund 20a000s00
Reserve for eontin83ncies
, 7;25 2350000*00
COUNTY UTILITY DEBT FUND:
Interest on Principal on Bonds 0880518.75
Reserve for contingencies 143� 143_65 2319662#40
COUNTY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION FUND:
W4ter line construction 28%000.00
Installation of water meters .60:;00�,_ 347S000.00
COUNTY GARXE:
Operation 866000.00 26*000.00
G101D TOTAL•.•.•*go s,...•.e••.•r••�7�628,?103.9�
REVWM SST���
Year Ending
June 30, 1956
Totals
SOURCES OF R97ENUE:�—
Anticipated Surplus at beginning
of year
01450000.00
Current taxes
1i657j100.00
Delinquent Taxes and Land Redemptions
630000*00
Miscellaneous Revenue from Local
'
Sources
84j750000
Appropri at ion from Other Local Funds
40j000.00
From the Commonwealth
148j500000
'
From sale of Auto Tags
100,000600
o2g238t350.00
DOG TAX FUND:
'
Anticipated Surplus at beginning of year 1.0;000,300
Sale of Dog Tags
13,000000
23i000.00
VIRGINIA PUBLIC ASSIST:INCE:
'
From State and FlDderal Governments
0109L475+90
From Local IVnds
38r364.10
147#840000
ETTRICK SANITARY DISTRICT OPERATING FW:
Anticipated Surplus
179000000
Ragenue from sole of water & sewer
charges
19 C 500 40
'
Revenue from connection charges
50000
370000.00
Er CK S.WITIRY DISTRICT DEBT FM:
'
41at icipated Surplus
339375*00
33#375.00
COUNTY ROAD FUND:
Anticipated Surplus 14000040
Appropriation from Local Funds 22`*000600_ 360000900
COUNTY SCHOOL FUND:
From sale of Bond s 198130592.00
From Commonwealth of Virginia 702j049.27
From Local sources ' 10f2A0.95
Appropriation from Local Fiends �1j747,*094*28. 402720976*50
COUNTY UTILITY OPERVING FUND:
Revenue from sale of water 235,000.00 2359000.00
COUNTY UTILITY DEBT FM*.
Anticipated Surplus 125j643.65 '
Transfer from Oper. Fund 10620� 1�5 231#662*40
COMM UTILITY CONSTRUCTION FUND
Antitipated Surplus 3j000.00
Revenue from connection fees 60j000900
From money advanced by cpstomsrs 2640000.00
Am system improvements (Transfer '
from Operating to Construction) 20,000=00 347*000.00
ROTENCTE ESTIDH,tiTF
COWTY GAILIGE:
From a ale of goods and a arvioe ; 260000.00
IUTE: 02.20 per hundred for all Distriot.
Machinery: 4(4
0260000.00
A. L. PORTER
PRESIDENT
STANLEY R. HAGUE, JR.
IST VICE PRESIDENT
C. H. ZEHMER
2ND VICE PRESIDENT
H. L. BRANKLEY
PAST PRESIDENT
C. H. MOON
SECRETARY
C. A. UTZ
TREASURER
W. B. SPECK
FIELD SECRETARY
S. PAGE HIGGINBOTHAM
ATTORNEY
Organized in 1935
To Preserve and Improve Local Government
TO; County Officials of Virginia
TELEPHONE 3.3146
FROM: W. B. Speck, Field Secretary
VIRGINIA IS HOST TO THE NATIOIN
DISTRICT MEMBERS
OF
EXECUTIVE BOARD
1ST DIST. M. T. GRUBB
2ND DIST. G. W. MILLER
3RE DIST. IRVIN G. HORNER
4TH DIST. W. H. STORY
STH DIST. B. M. BECKHAM
eTH DIST. DR. W. O. TUNE
7TH DIST. J. M. MCLAUGHLIN
eTH DIST. W. W. WOOD
9TH DIST. T. E. TABOR
1 OTH DIST. M. W. FOX
April 18, 1955
The National Association of County Officials (NACJ) is holding its 19th
annual conference in Richmona, Virginia, July 17th through the 20th. Headquar-
ters for the meeting is the John IMarshali Hotel.
It has been the custom for the count-; officials of the host state to
provide entertainment for the delegates and their .wives attending the meeting.
A Committee representing the League of Virginia Counties, the Clerks', Com-
missioners' of Revenue, Treasurers', Sheriffs' and Commonwealth Attorneys'
Associations is hard at tworv, arranging a program of entertainment. Naturally
there will be considerable expens;: attached as there will be around 1,000 per-
sons in attendance and certainly none of us would •rant to have it said that the
meeting in Virginia did not measure up to previous meetings in Florida, Texas,
Massachusetts, Wisconsin or the other states where NACO has met.
Virginia entertainers of National recognition swill provide entertainment
at the banquet.
A trip to Williamsburg, including seeing the "Common Glory" drama, is
being considered as a special feature of entertainment.
A reception is planned for the evening of the day of arrival of our
guests at the meeting.
Special entertainment features are being, planned for the ladies who will
be in attendance.
At a meeting of the Executive Board of the League I was directed to write
to the members of Boards of Supervisors and other county officials of each coun-
ty asking for county contribution to the League to help defray the cost of pro-
viding entertainment for the NACO meeting.
M
In
- 2 -
Several counties have indicated their willingness to make a contribution
but this effort can only be successful if counties generally participate.
The Committee estimates that it will require around $6,000.00 to finance
this entertainment.
A souvenir program is being planned for distribution both before the
meeting by mailing it to the 3,050 counties of the 48 states and for use at the
meeting. Recognition will be given in the program to all contributors.
Of course, advertising space is also available in the souvenir program
for counties to advertise in such manner as they choose the advantages and
attractions of individual counties. Rate sheEt and contract for space in the
program is being sent the Clerk and Chairman of each Board of Supervisors.
A post meeting conducted tour of Virginia points of interest is being
considered. This feature would be available to individuals at their own ex-
pense but would be at cost to make it attractive for our visitors to see the
various parts of the State.
Your support of this program of entertainment is necessary to insure its
success.
Please send your contribution to this office making your check payable
to League of Virginia Counties and marking it "SPECIAL CONTRIBUTION."
A. L. PORTER
PRESIDENT
STANLEY R. HAGUE. JR.
IST VICE PRESIDENT
C. H. ZEHMER
2ND VICE PRESIDENT
H. L. BRANKLEY
PAST PRESIDENT
C. H. MOON
SECRETARY
C. A. UTZ
TREASURER
W. B. SPECK
FIELD SECRETARY
S. PAGE HIGGINBOTHAM
ATTORNEY
But ]of
Organized in 1935
To Preserve and Improve Local Government
TELEPHONE 3-3146
National Association of County Officials
19th Annual Convention
July 17 - 20, 1955
John Marshall Hotel
Richmond, Virginia
SOUVENIR PROGRA,I
SPACE RATES
One page
Three quarter page
Half page
One fourth page
Preferred position
Double page spread
Back cover
Inside covers
Half page
One fourth page
SIZE OF PAGES: 82 x 11
COVER: CHROME COAT 65 lb. stock
PAGES: 50 lb. white enamel stock
SIZE TYPE: 10 pt. century - blue ink
$ 250.00
200.00
150.00
85.00
550.00
500.00
400.00
175.00
100.00
DISTRICT MEMBERS
OF
EXECUTIVE BOARD
IST DIST. M. T. GRUBB
2ND DIST. G. W. MILLER
3RE DIST. IRVIN G. HORNER
4TH DIST. W. H. STORY
STH DIST. B. M. BECKHAM
8TH DIST. DR. W. O. TUNE
7TH DIST. J. M. MCLAUGHLIN
8TH DIST. W. W. WOOD
8TH DIST. T. E. TABOR
1 OTH DIST. M. W. FOX
COST OF CUTS, COLOR AND SPECIAL HANDLING TO BE BORNE BY ADVERTISER
DEADLINES:
PROOFREADING BY ADVERTISER - May 20
PRINTER - June 1
MAILING - June 15
*40 SOUVRNIR PROGRAM
for
19TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE
of the
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY OFFICIALS
Richmond, Virginia, July 17th through 20th
TO: League of Virginia Counties
302 County Office Building
Charlottesville, Virginia
Please insert our advertisement as submitted, in the above publication, to occupy space as indicated below:
Terms: Check with order.
SIGNED-- ---- ---------------------------..................... .-------------------------------------------- TITLE .---------------
COMPANY----------------- ---•......................................
..__..__.....
ADDRESS------------------------------------ :._......._..............
DATE........... ....•--------...... ----............... 19........
SOUVENIR PROGRAM
for
19TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE
of the
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY OFFICIALS
Richmond, Virginia, July 17th through 20th
TO: League of Virginia Counties
302 County Office Building
Charlottesville, Virginia
Please insert our advertisement as submitted, in the above publication, to occupy space as indigated below:
t
Terms: Check with order.
SIGNED.................•------------.....----.....--------....................•--•......
COMPANY---------------------........................................................
.......TI'I"LE ..........
ADDRESS ...........
DATE...............................................I9 .
M
T5
PRESIDENT
A. L. PORTER
R. F. D. NO. 1
RURAL RETREAT, VIRGINIA
1ST VICE PRESIDENT
STANLEY R. HAGUE, JR.
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
2ND VICE PRESIDENT
C. H. ZEHMER
MCKENNEY. VIRGINIA
SECRETARY
C. H. MOON
WARMINSTER, VIRGINIA
TREASURER
C. A. UTZ
BARBOURSVILLE, VIRGINIA
IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT
H. L. BRANKLEY
SKIPWITH, VIRGINIA
DISTRICT MEMBERS
OF
EXECUTIVE BOARD
FIRST DISTRICT
M. T. GRUBB
HUDGINS, VIRGINIA
SECOND DISTRICT
GEORGE W. MILLER
II27 LILAC AVENUE
NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
THIRD DISTRICT
IRVIN G. HORNER
ROUTE NO. I
MOSELEY, VIRGINIA
FOURTH DISTRICT
W. H. STORY
CAPRON, VIRGINIA
FIFTH DISTRICT
B. M. BECKHAM. JR.
ROUTE NO. 1
DANVILLE, VIRGINIA
SIXTH DISTRICT
DR. W. O. TUNE
BROOKNEAL, VIRGINIA
SEVENTH DISTRICT
J. M. MCLAUGHLIN
MILLSORO, VIRGINIA
EIGHTH DISTRICT
W. W. WOOD
EARLYSVILLE, VIRGINIA
NINTH DISTRICT
T. E. TABOR
NEWBERN. VIRGINIA
TENTH DISTRICT
M. W. FOX
R. F. D. NO. 2
VIENNA. VIRGINIA
Organized
"To Preserve and Improve Local Governmenf'
TELEPHONE 3-3146
Dear Fellow Supervisors:
!r FIELD SECRETARY
W. B. SPECK
302 COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA
4
May 5, 1955
ATTORNEY
S. PAGE HIGGINBOTHAM
ORANGE. VIRGINIA
The County Supervisors of Virginia will again join with other
local officials of the State in sponsoring the Local Government
Officials' Conference to be held at the University of Virginia in
Charlottesville on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, August 29, 30,
and 31. Registration for the Conference will be held on Monday
morning, and the program will end at about 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday.
You will receive additional information from time to time concern-
ing housing accommodations, meals, and other local arrangements at
the University.
As in the past, our Field Secretary, Bill Speck, will be working
with the group at the University to arrange a useful and interesting
program. The program chairman.of the various associations have al-
ready had a preliminary meeting with representatives of the University
of Virginia, and I urge you to send to Bill any program suggestions
that you might have.
The State Compensation Board will share in reimbursing those
attending the Conference who are compensated by the State and the
county for expenses actually incurred not to exceed $40.00. For
most officers this is adequate to cover expenses connected with the
meeting.
Several months ago you received a copy of the proceedings of
the 1954 Local Government Officials' Conference. Enclosed in this
letter is a financial report covering the receipts and disbursements
of last year's Conference.
Again, may I remind you of the dates, August 29, 309 and 31,
and urge you to attend this important Conference.
Sincerely yours,
r, . -Z. ea, 1�,
A. L. Porter
President
M
RECEIPTS AND DISBURSE14ENTS
LOCAL GOVERiEM OFFICIALS' CONFERENCE
Held at the University of Virginia
August 23, 24, and 25, 1954
Receipts
Registration Fees, 426 @ $5.00 $2,130.00
Meal Tickets Sold 1,124.00
Picnic Supper Tickets 742.00
Total Receipts $3,996.no
Disbursements
Expenses of Speakers 339.91
Catering Costs
Meals $1,129.00
Social Hour (food) 148.16
Picnic Supper 818.4o
2,095.56
Expense of Extra Staff 143.70
Cost of Proceedings
Printing 946.20
Stencils 20.00
Postage and Envelopes 115.08
$1,081.28
Extension Division 319.50
Miscellaneous
Replacement of Broken
Dormitory Door 50,00
Photography 88.00
138.00
Total Disbursements $4,117.95
DISBURST110,1TS OVER RECEIPTS
$121.95
You will notice that receipts for meal tickets and for the picnic supper
are balanced by expenditures for those two items. Thus, all other expendi-
tures are defrayed by the receipts from the registration fee.
This statement does not include the contribution made by the University
of Virginia, which includes the time of the staff of the Bureau of Public
Administration, traveling expenses in connection with organizing the program,
and the cost of tying and mailing the advance announcements of the Conference
111W `40
VI1omIA: At a aaeetiaeg of the Ple=iag CammissIOU
of Chesterfield Coultye held at the
Courthouse On May 49 1955s at 7s30 pcan
Presents
Mr. Re Plaimay Sawaars, Chairman
Mr. Ceeail Belcher
Mro Dave Re Grenoble
Mro Re Pe Raglan
Mr. T*AoKeok o axe.
Mr. Z op oomt sr
Mra MeWBurmtt, Secretary
After considerable dissuasion on the past twelve months work and on motion
of Yre0unters seconded by Mro look, it is resolved that this Cowdselon,
adopt the report on the Mentor Plan which is an fO110 rs:
At the request of the Board of Supervisors of t08teartield County,
the Planning Ccomlesion has made a study of existing moniaag ordinances
and amadments t2arsto, for the purpose of aUggeoting further amsadmeats9
extensions and chaaage9se, After a wnprehensive i.uvestigatlas► of these
problem, the Comissi.oat has concluded that it is not practicable at this
time to exact oast all-inclusive zontat ordinance, rezoning lsrge *mesa
The Commission feet,, however, that a saaiag plan, as M parr of a Coaoty
Master Plan should be adoptede Such a soniag plans if adopted, should
hereafter servo as a blueprint and guide for the Board of Supervisors in
the disposition of all future sowing O,pp71seat ions o
In conformity, with these conalusionso the Planning Cams; sioah,
at its meeting On M r ha 19556 by unanim vis vote, of those attending
adopted %be follow1fig preamble and resolutions
Whoresee the C.hasterfield County Planning CommUsian has made
careful and acaVrehsnsive surveys and studies of existing soaiag regulations
and probable fracture ohasages of such reguletioaaw within the County, and
has conducted public hearings and has hoard expert w1tasessew public
officials and interested citizensg who expressed themselves ocacenting the
need for planned waing; and
Waryaa4o the Camae34810a is of the opWOA that a Master Plan
for the County should be developed and thata though saah a Master Plan
se a whole cannot be adopted at this time, neverthelses,es the waft
of maiciag the vholo Master Plan progresses, a part or parts of ,such plat
should be adopted from tins to tine; and
Wherooss the Commission is farther aoarlaeod tkat the concluded
work of its zoning studlea, evidenoed by maps and charts, should be
considered a port of a County Master Plan;
Now, Therefore, Be it Resolved, 'that the naps approved by
this Commission in its zoning studio be, and the seine► hereby are adopted
as a part of the Chesterfield County Master Plan; that each page of said
maps shall be identified by the stapp of the Commission, to which shell be
affixed the signature of its aecrertary; and
m
m
Be it PurtbAr Resolved,, that the pae of the Qwterfield
Cindy itaate7r Plan herelaebovs, adopted,, be designatod an Part Z,
7AniAgo and that s oopa of euoh Pery i,, Zftift be tmd the *am
hereby is eartiflod to the Hoard of ftper+risorz of Chesterfield
0ountyg Viminu
Copy 0- Test*
soret $27
V IFMIA B At a SWUM M of the P14=1139
Coma3sai6a of Ohsatevfield Cotmtrs
held at the Coart cuo oa X47 4#M45.
St 7s3D polo
Presents
Ure IL Piainey saerers 0 Chairman
k„'e 08011 Belcher
VX.Da" H. CaVAOble
Yre R.Pr Eagles
/fro T:A-UCk, Jro
'lot, Y AZ OOMAtor
,air. M.W.Buned t, Secretary
on notl oa of We Boldbsr & seaonded by Mr. Bt3e sq the follmsina rsowaadatioat
ate ad4)Aedt
1p The omm, sign urges that the areas designated in the attaohed
ovoria$s be rezoned immediately, for the "anon that the" weat
are svbjedt to wee that requite dmflatte awning. It will be
acted that most of the lent! In this oatega' is AOW belsg wed
for subdivisiaaa purpaeso
as It is Us opiaiom of the CWa1WdOA that b6A4sfWt% WW DW
subdivision should not be tentatively appro"d wt#il the awe
it comprises in toned to *WOra with the pra}xmsd I" o
3o The Comodseioa suggests+ that all aEpplioatiomt to tic Board of
8uper,visors for s onimg amendments, ezUralws op ehaftu be
vatarred to the Planning C- mreiselca, by the Board of 8UPrrisaxst
fW its reeamondation s before final deeis iou 1s nude by IM
Hoard. Such prooedure wo►uId help the devalopmem% of the Raster
Plan of the County sad would, it is bellovedg "IJL eve the Board
of 69"rri801a Of MAY Of tba ai90-40ASUMUS %A1 IL94s 2W 1WOkrd
is the prodet Ing of zoning applicaticam e
9. The Cosa lasiosa suggests that oomridirattoa be givot to the present
mutigg 03.sasiaki0e910sus with the thought that additioma moms$
elassifiastions mar be neoeseary to insure orderly dervelopasnt
eatd proper use of land I& tbs County,
3o The ssitsx ; recomems that an all PrSmeary roads Ue aerie
maid busicteas areas be a miulmm of 308 feet is depth sod thst
whmnrve r a right of gray is ehaaged due fc the reloodlem of a
goads 09A the reaonmeudatiw for business smug be a slalmm
of 300 meet In depth iron the now right of wear*
A Copy: matt -
Se+oratssy
M
M
MU]H LEMAN & KAYIH O E, INC.
Contractors
A.KENTON MUHLEMAN SOS EAST FRANKLIN STREET
PRESIDENT RICHMOND 19, VIRGINIA
WILLIAM F. KAYHOE SEC'Y.-TREAS. April 29, 1955
Board of Supervisors
Chesterfield County
Chesterfield Court House, Virginia
Gentlemen:
MARION S. BOISSEAU
VICE-PRES.
ETHEL W.RYERSON
ASS-T. SEC'Y.-TREAS.
With much interest we noted the announcement in the
paper this morning of your decision not to change the definition
of the word "Subdivision" in accordance with the recommendations
of the City Planning Commission. We are in full accord with your
decision and want to thank you for taking the positive position
in reference thereto.
We feel that the isolated cases which the Planning
Commission was attempting to eliminate were in reality not done
by progressive developers or property owners, but by individuals.
The change in definition would certainly be more detre-
mental than the over-all application to the greater number of
people.
Thanking you again, we are
Very truly yours,
MUHLEMAN & KAYHOE, INC.
WFK:HT William F. Kayhoe
I.: I T (11 1�i.�>.
CON 1'RACITOR
April 29 - 1955.
Mr. Irvin G. Horner, Chairman
Board of Supervisors
Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Dear Mr. Horner -
I want to congratulate you and your Board on their stand
in regard to the subdivision act.
It is gratifying to know that we have people in public
office who recognize the right of property owners. Some
of the regulations that have been proposed to regulate
people who own land, it would appear that they are totally
unqualified to handle their property and the State must
do it for them.
Good planning and regulations are justified and needed,
but where a regulation takes away the rights of people
to such an extent that they have no control of their
property seems to be very unjust.
EBW:S.
Very truly yours
Eugene B. West.
CORPS OF ENGUMORS, U. S. ARIN
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ENGINEER
NORFOLK DISTRICT
FOOT OF FRONT STREET
NOPFQLK 1, VIRGIMA
28 April 1955
PUBLIC NOTICE
On 23 "_March 1955, the Secretary of the Army approved regulations per-
mitting the closing of drawbridges to navigation during major disaster or
civil defense emergencies b,r the proper civil defense
eeauthorities,
utds on ies, The
cal mil
regulations have been adopted to meet the planning
from urban areas. They are as
defense authorities for rapid evacuation
f 01 laws
Pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the River and Harbor Act
of August 18, 1894 (28 Stat. 362; 33�U.S.C. 499), section203.1(Cofedraw-
of
Federal Regulations) is hereby prescribed tooperation
bridges for certain periods determined -to be in the interests of public
safety by the proper civil defense authorities during a major disaster or
civil defense emergency, as follows:
203.1 General. Dravrbrid.ges across navigable waters of the United
States will not be opened to navigation for certain periods determined to
be in the interests of public safety by the proper civil defense author.-
ties during a major disaster or civil defense emergency Indicated by the
military condition of warnings YELLOW (i.e., attack by Y
probable) or RED (i.e., attack by enemy aircraft, J=rn inent) notwithstaxld-
ing any general or special
drawbrxz�dgeeortofore or drawbridges.eafter prescribed
for the operation of y such
These regulations will be in full force
er�.sterd effect
vLererpublishedays
in
after their publication in the Federal Register,
the Federal Register on 12 April 1955, T:otice of their approval
eisin the
ing
distributed to all Down Interested parties, and will be p
press and posted at post offices.
R. B. VIARREY
Colonel, Corps of Engineers
District Engineer
CENTURY, PETERSBURG *00y
PALACE, PETERSBURG
ALBERT BERNSTEIN.
DISTRICT MANAGER
BLUEBIRD. PETERSBURG ll T�ealres
REX. PETERSBURGei Uorhood
REGENT, COLONIAL HEIGHTS
BEACON. HOPEWELL. P. O. BOX 709
BELLWOOD DRIVE-IN, PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA
PETERSBURG PIKE
may 7, 1955
Board of Supervisors
Chesterfield County
Chesterfield County Courthouse,
Virginia
Untlement
PHONE REGENT 8-7402
It is requested that permission be granted the BELLWOOD
DRIVE -INN THEATRE on Petersburg Pike to have an aerial
pyrotechnic display on Monday, July 4, 1955.
It is understood that if this permission is granted, we
will make arrangements for Fire Protection with the Fire
Department.
It is further understood that the Fireworks will be
ignited by a competent and responsible person.
It is further understood that when the Fireworks arrive
in Richmond, we will secure a permit from the Virginia
State Police to transport the Fireworks from Richmond to
the Bellwood Drive -In Theatre on Petersburg Pike and Willis
Road.
If there are any other conditions to be met, please met
us know.
Thanking you in advance, I amp
Very truly yours,
ALBERT RNSTEII'�
District Manager
THE SEVERAL THEATRES OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP ARE OPERATED BY SEPARATE CORPORATIONS AND
THIS LETTER IS WRITTEN ON BEHALF OF THE CORPORATION WHICH OPERATES THE THEATRE INVOLVED.
��-t2� /s- �a S
alpz.Cc� .�o.l�� ,u�t�A...�.«��e�.,Yo �—�
�rc�-e-_�.c�, �4�A. cap otic.,�ce�-�Q. a.e.� ��-d-c�-e-a..`�`�
L E W I S H. V A D E N
COUNTY CLERK AND CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
of the
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
R E P O R T O N A U D
FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1954
- C 0 N T E N T S --
Comments
Statement of Financial Condition
Statement of Revenue Receipts and Disbursements
Condemnation Funds
Depository Bonds
Statement of Compensation
Excess Fees Refundable to the Commonwealth of Virginia
Funds Under the Control of the Circuit Court on Deposit
According to the Records of the Depositories and
in Custody of the Clerk
01
Exhibit A
Exhibit A-1
Schedule 1
Schedule 2
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
n
cm
n
GIN
s��SeMpERT ;L
J. GORDON BENNETT
AUDITOR
C. P. JOHNSON, JR.
JOSEPH S. JAMES
ASSISTANTS
To the Board of Supervisors
County of Chesterfield
Commonwealth of Virginia
Chesterfield, Virginia
Dear Sirs:
'g?
. '17`1.� T 3s �1 I��
AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
We have audited the accounts and records of
RICHMOND 10
April 27, 1955
LEWIS H. VADEN
COUNTY CLERK AND CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
of the
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
for the calendar year 1954,and present our report in the form of the statements
set forth in the table of contents.
The examination disclosed that the clerk had made full accounting for
all funds of record coming into his custody. He is to be commended for the ex-
cellent manner in which his records had been prepared.
We have included in this report,on Exhibit D,a statement of the funds
under the control of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County at December 31, 1954.
The information with respect to the accounts was furnished to us by the banks and
the clerk. No audit of these funds has been made by us, and the inclusion of
this statement,which is for the information of the Court,should not be construed
as indicating that the funds have been audited.
The following statistical data concerning the activities of the clerks
office for the calendar year 1954 are presented for informative purposes:
Deeds recorded 7,002
Wills and administrations recorded 122
Chancery causes - New 200
Actions at law - New 82
Criminal cases tried 132
Hunting and fishing licenses sold 3,621
Marriage licenses issued 305
The records disclosed that the clerk was bonded in the amount of $25,000
with the National Surety Corporation as surety.
We acknowledge the co-operation extended to us during the course of
the engagement.
CPJ. ap
gd. 11
Very truly yours,
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
At December 31, 1984 Exhibit A
A S S E T S
Cash on hand $ 45.90
Cash on deposit with:
Chesterfield County Bank, Chester, Virginia
Regular account $22,429.86
Condemnation funds account 200.00 22,629.86
Total $22, 674.86
L I A B I L I T I E S
Condemnation funds (Schedule 1) $ 200.00
Unclassified receipts 6.15
Clerk of the court: (Exhibit C)
Excess fees refundable to the Commonwealth of Virginia/ .21,804.96
Sub -total ($xhibit A-1) $22�011.11
Unexpended deposits in suits 24.65
Depository bonds (Schedule 2) 527.26
Reserve for petty cash advance 25.00
Reserve for revenue stamps not attached 20.00
Reserve for old outstanding checks 66.85
Total $22, 674.86
STATEMENT OF REVENUE RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS
Year Ended December 31, 1954 Exhibit A-1
Balance Disburse- Balance
Items Jan. 1, Receipts Total meats Dec. 81,
1 9 5 4 1 9 5 4
Commonwealth of Virginia:
Tax on deeds
$ -
$ 68,111.35
$ 68,111.35
$ 63,111.35
$ -
Tax on wills and administrations
-
1,887.80
1,887.80
1,887,80
-
Tax on chancery causes
-
226.50
226.60
226.50
-
Tax on actions at law
-
212.00
212.00
212.00
-
Fines and forfeited recognicances
-
56,619.12
58,619.12
58,619.12
-
Costs in criminal cases
-
48.10
48.10
48.10
-
Pra,-;eeds of confiscations and
-
622.88
622.88
622.83
-
forfeited property
Hunting and fishing license sales
-
6,560.50
6,660.50
6,560.50
-
Tax an marriage licenses
-
610.00
287.50
610.00
287.50
610.00
287.50
-
-
Commonwealth's attorney fees
Trial Justice Court fees
-
-
132136.25
13,136.25
13,186.25
-
Total
$ -
$143,821.95
$143,321.95
$148,321�95
$ -
County of Chesterfield.
Fines
$ -
$ 294:50
$ 294.50
$ 294.50
$ -
Commonwealth's attorney fees
-
199.48
2,218.72
199.48
2,218.72
199.48
2,218.72
-
-
Land ransfer fees
-
Land redemptions, delinquent taxes,
-
9,849.31
9,849.31
9,849.31
-
penal�iy and interest
Fees of sheriff and deputies
-
128.01
128.01
128,01
-
County police fees
-
24.21
_ 24.21
24,21
-
Total
$ -
$ 12,714.23
$ 12,714.23
$ 12,714.23
$ -
City of Colonial Heights.
F?.3es
$
100.00
$
213.75 $
Costs in criminal cases
4.00
8.80
Land transfer fees
-
$03.30
Total
Advances for purchase of revenue
stamps $
40.27
$
140<27 $
Collections for others
$
19.00
$
897.6E $
Condemnation funds
$
200.00
$
- $
Unclassified receipts
$
8.14
$
- _ $.
C1 k f the court•
313.75 $ 318.76. $
7,80
7.80
-
303.30
303.30
-
-- ---
624.85
-
$
624,85
$ -
100.00
$
100.00
$ -
416.56
$
416.56
$ -
200.00
$
$ 200.00
8.14
$
1.99
$ B.ib
er o
Fees, commissions, etc. $15,845.91 $ 45,957.88� $ 61,308.79 $ 39,498.83 $21,804.96_
Total receipts, disbursements $15,636.78 $203,052.74 $218,689.52 $196,678.41 $22,011.11
and balances
ltalic�s denote debit See Exhibit B for details
11w
C O
N D E M N A T I
O N F U N D S
At December 31,
1954
Schedule 1
Date
Page
Number
St le
y
of
Case
Amount
10 30 28
88
Commonwealth vs
S.
E. Sheppard
$ 50.00
4 2 31
90
Commonwealth vs
J.
J. Goodrich
50.00
4 2 31
4 2 31
90
144
Commonwealth vs
J.
Frank Lundie
50.00
Commonwealth vs
G.
V. Clarke, et als
50.00
Total
$ 200.00
D E P O S I T O R Y B 0 N D S
At December 31, 1964 Schedule 2
Date Style of Case Amount
1
19
54
Southern Bank and Trust Company vs Roy F. Waters
$ 25,00
2
9
51
Thomas J. Lafoon vs H. H. Balthour
150.00
10
3
52
Dr. Tarter vs D. D. Poe and Mrs. D. D. Poe
25.00
12
11
52
H. R. Hart vs Kenneth O'Brien
25�00
3
19
53
Bernard Siegal Furniture Company vs Blick
25.00
7
10
53
Richmond Production Credit Association vs Mazza
26.00
2
11
54
L. W. T. Bulifant, Inc. vs J. E. Curri-n
25.00
4
30
54
Commonwealth vs Edward Nathaniel Saylor
104.25
7
8
54
County of Chesterfield vs Donald Grover Gentry
25.00
7
27
54
City of Colonial Heights vs Clarence C. Johnson
49.00
7
27
54
City of Colonial Heights vs Bernice K. Johnson
49.00
Total $ 527.25
S T A T E M E N T O F C O M P E N S A T I O N
Year Ended December 31, 1964 Exhibit B
Income:
Fees and other remuneration:
Deeds
$21,728.90
Wills and administrations
1,224.75
Chancery causes
2,727.46
Act-ons at law
681.50
Criminal cases
4,921.50
Commissions and fees on land redemptions and delinquent
taxes
721.16
Recording lands sold and delinquents
97.71
Commissions on State revenue
4,980.00
Commissions on hunting and fishing licenses
824.86
Issuing marriage licenses
610.00
Reporting marriages and adoptions
37.65
Commissions on transfer fees
280.23
Preparing voting Last
177.12
Miscellaneous
Salary paid by county:
5,945.05
County clerk
1,000.00
Expenses: Total
$45,957.88
Compensation of employees:
U
Mrs. Petro D. Longest
$ 3,600.00
Mrs. Margaret Foster
3,139,92
\
Mrs. June Burton Phillips
Mrs. Elizabeth 0. Tucker
3,000.00
2,620.00
Miss Bertha W. Carr
1,965.00
Miss Frances Smith
193.00
Office:
Bond premium
125.00
Postage
360.00
14,902.92
Income in excess of expenses allowed
$31,O54.98
`r
Excess fees refundable to the Commonwealth of Virginia
(Exhibit C)
21,804.96
��\
Net compensation of clerk
$ 9,250.00
M
n
EXCESS FEES REFUNDABLE TO THE
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
At December 31, 1954
Income:
From all sources (Exhibit B)
Allowances'
Compensation allowed by statute
Allowance for salary paid by county
Total compensat on allowable
Expenses allowed by Compensation Board
Total allowances
Excess fees - Year Ended December 31, 1954
$ 8, 250.00
1, 000.00
$ 9, 250.00
14,902.92
Exhibit C
$45,957.88
24,162.92
$21,804.96
FUNDS UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE CIRCUIT COURT ON DEPOSIT ACCORDING TO
THE RECORDS OF THE DEPOSITORIES AND IN CUSTODY OF THE CLERK
At December 31, 1954 Exhibit D
Number Style of Case Amount
Opened
First and
Merchants National Bonk,, Richmond, Virginia,
Checking accounts:
8 1
25
Ada Irene Jones vs Jones, et al
-
Rooke vs Britton, e• als
-
Chalkley vs Seaboard
-
Hogan vs Hogan
-
R, B. Tignor vs Barker, et als
Cobb, Executor vs Woolridge, et als
5 29
27
W. A. Eastman vs Fred M. Eastman, et als
-
Sarah Paredes, etc., vs Mary Drewery, et als
Franklin
Federal Savings and Loan Association; Richmond, Virginia:
Sav;nge,
a.counts:
1 20
38 253
R. Mall;)ry vs Robertson, Executor, etc.
7 14
39 664
Herbert Sm'th vs William Quarles
270 shares
- Inves-ements:
1 20
38 270-7
R. Mallory vs Robertson, Executor, etc.
Mechanics
and Merchants Bank,
Richmond, Virginia
Cbe king
ac�counts;
3 12
34
P. V. Coghill - Hatcher Comm.; vs Howlett
5 24
34
Rook and wife vs Br-*tton, et als
Cobb, ex als vs Woolridge, et als
W.A. Eastman vs Fred M. Eastman
Now"land, et als vs Watkins, et als
Supervisor of Chesterfield vs Woolridge Estate
Townes, et als vs J. B. Jones, Administrator
Carpenter's Executor vs Carpenter
Wood vs Wood, et ais
5 24
34
F. N. B. of Baltimore vs Westham Granite Company
5 10
34
Estate of A. and J. Bryant vs S. B. Gary
6 20
34
Epps Spiers and Company vs Chalkley, et als
Agnes C. Clarke vs Florence E. Leonard
Belcher vs Wills and Moncure, Trustees
Cheatham vs Cheatham
Clarke vs Cunliffe
6 26
34
R. P. and C. Company vs Robinson's Heirs
Rose J. Scott vs Thomas G. Scott
'
B. and L. Turner vs Clarke Division
Jacobs and wife vs Clay
Gibbs vs Gibbs
Moody vs Moody
Perdue vs Moore
R. P. and C. Company vs Pumphrey
o
R. F. and P. Railway Company vs Varnier
Berk'y Goode vs Goode
Henshaw, Guardian vs Talley
Daisy B. Winston vs Helen A. Miller
Poo', Comm. vs Crostiic
11 7
34
Walton 0. Snellings, Executor of Wallace Snellings
Phy"_is A. Snellings Ottey, et als
vs
$ 104.98
27.67
1,33
2.15
5,34
. 23
2,95
220.10
355.82
4, 322.34
2, 900.00
40.51
153.04
203.28
1, 750.00
489.28
255.68
569.11
537.74
45.44
85.99
13.00
87,17
11.68
125.51
114,07
97.71
99,70
116.00
1, 172.01
69.74
19.44
59.05
29.82
64.02
30.74
101.80
78.02
87.55
2.67
1, 726.48
Continued
Da?e
Opened
FUNDS UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE CIRCUIT COURT ON DEPOSIT ACCORDING TO
THE RECORDS OF THE DEPOSITORIES AND IN CUSTODY OF THE CLERK
At December 31, 1954 Exhibit D
Continued
Number
Style of Case
Mechanics
and Merchants Bank, Richmond, Virginia: Concluded
Cher_k'ng
accounts,
Concluded
4
11
5
13
50
42
Commonwealth Lumber Company vs William C, Ratcliff, et als
Landon Ellio,.t,
Administrator - Estate of Alice Elliott vs
Huatt and Harry E. Bolling
9
10
21
6
44
47
Martha Esther Whitaker vs Arkie Whitaker, et als
Gladys
7
21
48
R. Melius vs Mary E. Melius, et als
Aaron Day vs John Paul Day, an incompetent
Gibbs vs Gibbs
8
16
50
Ryland James Hughes vs Ethel May Royall
7
27
53
R. Willison vs A. G. Baker, et als
Guss;e C. Haynes vs Leonard Haynes, etc.
Savings Bank and Trust
Company, Richmond, Virginia:
Che;:king accounts:
8 24 36
Ice Co.
Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company vs Southern Coal and/
5
2
12
John MCP. Cooke, Sr. vs John McP. Cooke, Jr., et als
Richmond
Bank and Trust Company, Richmond, Virginia:
Check_ng �.ccoun..
11
20
36
Fowikes vs Watkins
Sa7.,ngs
accounts;
11
18
18 816
Burton vs Burton
2
24
21 818
Kennedy vs Robertson
4
24
22 820
Bradbury vs Bradbury, et als
1
14
25 815
City of Richmond vs Maude M. Smith
5
22
26 814
W. R. Gi?1 vs Martha Gill, et als
9
23
26 817
Patterson vs Patterson
2
20
51 396
A. F. M'_Sls vs Wm. H. Mills
Chesterfield County Bank, Chester, Virginia:
Checking accounts:
11
17
20
Ai'_ce G. Duval vs M'_;.is P. Duval, et als
3
29
26
Commonwealth of Virginia vs McClinton, etc.
�;�
9
23
27
Bass vs Kesee
4
12
16
9
28
30
Buckner, el a's vs Bright Hope Railway Comppany
Federal Land Bank of Baitimore vs Stephan Rehak
8
21
33
Joseph C. Drei,;o'.d vs Virginia Electric and Power Company
t
7
8
38
Perkinson Vs Perkinsoa
7
8
38
Julia A. Merrit- vs J.�tlia A. 14erritt's Heirs
`•.
10
1
40
R. T. Cogbii:, vs Walter Smith, et als
1
27
43
Commonwealth of Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs
S. E. Shepherd s heirs et als
7
6
43
Virginia Electric and Power Company vs R. Dunbar Moore,/
10
6
48
Commonwealth of Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs
Cora L. Blount, et als
v
12
7
43
County of Chesterfield vs Clarke B. Swallows' Heirs
8
4
44
Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Suit County of
Chesterfield vs Clarke B. Swallows' Heirs,O.F:Gates,Sheriff
10
16
47
Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Suit of William henry
1
Pryor vs Mary E. Booker
4
1
47
Circuit. Court of Chesterfield County vs unknown heirs of
Washington Cox
12
22
46
Circuit Court. of Chesterfield County - Suit, Town of
Coicnia_ Heights vs Cal-ie Shackelford Pugh
3
3
45
C;,unty of Chesterfield vs Richard Glass' Heirs
C
3
8
45
County of Chesterfield vs Executors of Thomasline Clair
%
Edwards and James E. Cuthbert vs J. Graham Edwards,et als
3
16
45
County of Chesterfield vs J. K. Johnson, Barbara J. and
Mary F. Fers
6
14
45
County of Chesterfield vs William Seal's Heirs
7
20
46
County of Chesterfield vs W, A. Worth, receiver of
Goodman and Bowers
7
20
45
County of Chesterfield vs Ann Laws' Heirs
'
7
24
45
County of Chesterfield vs Wyatt Mason's Heirs
9
19
45
County of Chesterfield vs E. A. Belcher, et als
9
19
45
County of Chesterfield vs Emmett Elam, et als
u,
9
22
45
County of Chesterfield vs Arthur Rbbinson's Heirs
10
11
45
County of Chesterfield vs Heirs of Richard Brown and
Margaret A. Brown
10
13
46
County of Chesterfield vs Phil Smith's widow and heirs
+.�
10
15
45
County of Chesterfield vs Nellie P. Cosley, et als
11
24
44
County of Chesterfield vs Conrad B. and Rosa L. Clarke
12
11
43
County of Chesterfield vs Francis Dunnavant, et als
5
3
44
County of Chesterfield vs W. W. Partin's Heirs
1
30
45
County of Chesterfield vs Heirs of Roberta L. Collier
2
2
45
County of Che€ terfield vs W. R, Turner's Heirs
Amount
$ 155.82
750.00
724.55
4.08
205.00
19.44
9.00
2,344.00
554,40
16.24
13.00
527.22
.02
321.14
11.67
113.71
386.49
277:41
93.24
101.38
100.00
261.84
430.19
99.73
10.68
213.26
1,271.75
21.88
183.96
887.58
958.82
219.16
103.16
2.59
814.38
50.00
384.19
10.32
844.41
482.72
144.87
686.92
8.95
292.30
8.00
210.80
74.52
67,86
182.56
77.76
552.26
43.14
14.21
212,09
Continued
%Aw
FUNDS UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE CIRCUIT COURT ON DEPOSIT ACCORDING
TO
THE RECORDS OF THE DEPOSITORIES AND IN CUSTODY OF THE CLERK
At December 31, 1954
Exhibit D
Da
Date
Continued
Opened
Number Style of Case
- ----
-- ___
Amount
hesterfield
County Bank, Chester, Virginia: Concluded
Checking accounts*
Concluded
10 5 47
Circuit Court of Chesterfield vs Suit of Everett Dodson,
12 6 46
et als vs Esther Dodson, et als
Circuit Court of Chesterfield vs Heirs
$ 5.05
4 5 46
of Americus Gilmore
Circuit Court of Chesterfield County - Cause vs Heirs
70.75
9 23 47
of
Anderson and Maria Haskins
Circuit Court of Chesterfield vs Rachel ARobinson
46.86
5 20 47
.
Hickman, et als
198.54
10 9 47
Circuit Court of Chesterfield vs Unknownrcuit Court of Chesterfield vs Laura B�HeirssofeLaura
59.50
Jones, deceased B.
22.75
7 29 47
Circuit Court of Chesterfield County - Cause of Fletcher F.
4 27 46
Jessup's Heirs vs Fletcher F. Jessup's Heirs
Circuit Court of Chesterfield County - Cause of Anthony Kohout
2,895.64
vs
Vera Kohout and Barbara Rose Kohout, the last named being
insane
480.14
2 14 47
person, and Federal Land Bank of Baltimore
Circuit Court of Chesterfield vs Heirs
5 12 47
4 8 47
of James Roderick Lynch
Circuit Court of Chesterfield vs Daniel Mead's Heirs
862.64
113.67
10 18 46
Circuit Court of Chesterfield vs S. A. Mobley,
Circuit Court of Chesterfield vs Julia Monroe'seHeirs
4 18 46
Circuit Court of Chesterfield - Cause Edward F. Mimms, et als
108.99
vs Cornelius Mimms' Heirs
25.07
9 21 51
Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, in cause of Commonwealth
of Virginia and County of Chesterfield,
vs Heirs of
Robert Mallory
6.95
12 21 51
Circuit Court Chesterfield County in cause of Commonwealth of
Virginia County
and of Chesterifield vs John C. Temple,
1.10
et als
8 17 51
Circuit Court of Chesterfield in the Suit of Virginia Electric
and Power Company vs William E. Goyne, et als ISuit #2V
158.45
7 11 52
Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in cause of Commonwealth
of Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Heirs of
11.98
William Lewis, et als
10 3 52
Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in cause of Annie Riley
Hatchel vs Heirs of James Riley
14.41
12 19 52
Circuit Court, Chesterfield County, in cause of Commonwealth
of Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Heirs of
26.09
Cyrus Johnson
12 24 52
Circuit Court Chesterfield County,in cause of Commonwealth
of Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Carlston
9.90
T. Crawford est.
10
Circuit Court,Chestefield County, in cause of Commonwealth of
7 53
Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Harry W.
64.53
Atkinson, et als
Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in suit Commonwealth of
9 29 53
Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Unkoo�mn Heirs of
1,096.74
Lucius M. Hull
1
Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in cause of Commonwealth of
10 2 53
Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Unknown Heirs of
281.80
Washington Ford
C
10 14 53
Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in cause of Commonwealth
41.b4
of Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs N.A.Johnson,et als
Circuit Court,Chesterfield County in cause of Commonwealth of
12 12 53
Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Heirs of
13097
A1ber-L Dudley
_
1 21 54
Circuit ucurt,uhesterfield County, in the case of Ruffin &
Payne, Inc. vs A. G. Baker, et als
gg0.09
9 8 54
Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in matter of J. A. Anderson,
150,00
State Highway Commission,Virginia P. M. Cooke
11 19
Circuit Court,Chesterfield County in cause of Commonwealth of
54
Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Willis Dobson,
987.48
Heirs of Rosa Dobson, deceased, et als
6 30 54
Circuit Court of Chesterfield in cause of Commonwealth of
Virginia
and County of Chesterfield, Unknown heirs of
420.38
Jacob Opie
4
Circuit Court of Chesterfield in cause of Commonwealth of
5 54
Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Unknown heirs of
118.68
Beverly Perry
7 2 64
Circuit Court of Chesterfield in cause of Commonwealth of
Virginia and County of Chesterfield vs Heirs of Edward
.55
H. Robertson
Union Bank and
Trust Company, Amelia, Virginia:
Savings account:
1 15 41
5181 P. V. Cogbill, Executor vs Martin, et als
2, 798.43
Continued
FUNDS UNDER
THE CONTROL OF THE CIRCUIT COURT ON DEPOSIT
ACCORDING
THE RECORDS OF THE DEPOSITORIES AND IN CUSTODY OF THE CLERK
At December 31, 1964
Date Opened r Numbe
Style of Case
Petersburg Savings and American Trust Company, Petersburg, Virginia:
Certificates of depposit:
6 2 00 47762
Unknown
9__25 07 72557
Unknown
Savings accounts:
12 16 42 148
M. C. Bottom's Heirs vs M. C. Bottom's Heirs
12 15 42 740
R. M. Andrews, at als va P. Andrews
12 16 42 744
Eliza J. Crump vs J. J. Crumppi/'a Admr.
12 16 42 741
R. M. Andrews, at als vs P. . Andrews' Heirs
'
12 16 42 748
J. Park, at als vs Park, at els
12 16 42 750
Debrill vs Thomas Howlett
7 12 49 5301
Annie Estelle Ramsey Chappell, Widow vs John William
Chappell and Mildred Louise Chappell
12 24 48 4896
Everett Dodson, at als ve Bather Dodson, at al
Bank of Commerce and Trusts (Main Office), Richmond, Virginia:
Checking account:
1 2 82
W. Nunnally, et cis vs R. Nunnally, et als
Bank of Commerce and Trust (Manchester Branch), Richmond, Virginia:
Checking accounts:
Beasley, Administrator vs W. M. Haines
1 80 12
Bland vs Bolling
5 28 12
Bottom vs Burton
1 19 15
S. J. Adams vs Earl Brooks
-
Clary vs Clary and Hatcher at als
-
P. V. Cogbill, Attorney for k. V. Clayton
Dance vs Berry
8 14 18
Charity Johnson vs Richard Johnson's Heirs
11 28 25
Cundiffe vs Cundiffe
Mabel J. Jarrett vs Cosby
12 20 27
Rachel Gill Dance vs J. Ester Gill, at als
-
Fisher vs Manders
5 29 28
Warwick vs Starke
-
Rowlett vs Rowlett
-
Varnier va Varnier
9 80 36
Shields vs Lee, et als
-1
P. V. Cogvill, Clerk vs Oscar Banks
6 87
Bank of Commerce and Trusts vs B. S. Nunnally, et
als
12 1 48
Cornelius P. Shields, et al vs Lucien Burke, at
als
v
-
R. L. Farmer vs Sarah Stark, et als
4 10 48
Clarence L. Brooks vs Ellen Crews Brooks
1 26 52
Leo J. Johnson, et als vs Edwyn Raymond Johnson
State -Planters Bank and
Trust Company, Richmond, Virginia:
i
Checking accounts:
Prior to
12 28 22
H. M. Drewery vs Martha A. Drewery's Administrator
12 23 22
Hobson, et als vs Hobson, Administrator
12 23 22
Jacobs and wife vs Clay, at als
12 23 22
Nalle administrator vs Brander
12 23 22
Nunnally vs Martin and wife
12 23 22
S. S. and W. W. Wilkinson va Sims Forsee, et als
3 8 26
Wrigght and wife vs Cheatham
W. C. Gill,
11 9 84
W. C. Gill's Administrator vs et als
2 6 42
A. S. Moody vs John J. Longest
Total
In Custody of the Clerk:
Fonds#: United States Savings,
Series E, dated October 1, 1949 maturing October 1,1959
Re; Bettie Venable Cogle's
Estate: (Harry L. Snead, Executori
Certificate
Payee Coat
Maturity
Value
Number
C-146280890 E
Mr. John Edwin Cogle, Jr. $ 75.00
$ 100.00
C-146290889 E
P. 0. D. 75.00
100.00
D- 19849242 E
Mr. John Edwin Cogle, Jr. 875.00
500.00
C-14HB0392 E
Mr. Arthur Carter Cogle 75.00
100.00
C-146280891 E
P. 0. D. 75.00
100.00
D- 19349241 E
Mr. Arthur L. Cogle, Jr. 875.00
600.00
C-146280898 E
Mr. Herbert L. Potts, Jr. 76.00
100.00
C-146280894 E
P. 0. D. 75.00
100.00
D- 19840940 E
Mr. Herbert Linwood Potts, Sr. 875.00
600.00
C-146280307 E
Miss June Frances Potts 75.00
100.00
C-14628088E E
P. 0. D. 75.00
100.00
D_. 1y349289 E
Mr. Herbert Linwood Potts, Sr. 875.00
500.00
Total
TO
Exhibit D
Conc3vded
Amount
$ 98.51
11.50
110.88
44.84
68.98
46.55
99.50
256.29
1, 171.77
444.68
1.85
886.10
81.73
84.00
89.00
85.38
195.56
108.78
2.82
811.81
516.61
91.82
2.00
11.51
294.18
40.37
10.12
148.69
.36
1.22
2.40
88.65
867.90
95.96
4.00
47.19
22.00
29.00
114.93
161.31
$1.61
1, 548.00
$ 60,453. 19
2,800.00
IN
WATER SUPPLY
SEWERAGE SYSTEMS
SEWAGE DISPOSAL
M
0
R. STUART ROYER & ASSOCIATES
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
15 WEST CARY STREET
RICHMOND 20. VIRGINIA
DIAL 7-2651
May 10, 1955
Board of Supervisors,
County of Chesterfield,
Chesterfield Court House,
Chesterfield, Virginia.
Attention: Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary
Gentlemen:
This is to supplement and revise portions of our letter of
February 25, 1955 in reference to certain engineering services in
connection with the development of improvements to the water system
of the County.
The following revised proposal is made after discussion with
Mr. Burnett at our office on May 9, 1955, as to probable areal scope of
the project and to what extent engineering services may be required.
The area we propose to study is generally circumscribed as
follows:
The entire eastern section of the County as: bounded on the north
and east by the City of Richmond and the James River and on the south by
the Appomattox River and the City of Colonial Heights. The western
boundary will be approximately:
State Secondary Highway Route 673 from the James River to State
Primary Route Alt, thence generally westward to include Midlothian and
back to Route 653, thence along Route 653 to Route 604, along Routes 604P
10, 625, 600, 628 and 669 to the Appomattox River.
The area above outlined is approximately 200 square miles.
We propose to make a comprehensive study of this area, to
include all the items as enumerated in the attachment to our letter to
February 25, 1955 on the basis of actual personnel cost, plus 75 per
cent overhead plus 25 per cent profit on personnel costs and overhead,
but not to exceed a total of 425,000.
We will furnish the County ten (10) copies of such report.
For design, preparation of plans and specifications, contract
documents, et cetera, and for general supervision, we propose the
REPORTS
DESIGNS
APPRAISALS
n
M
Attn.:
Mr. M.11, Burnett
Page #2 May 10, 1955
following fees:
Fee - % of Construction Cost
Pump Stations
Construction Filter Plants General
Cost Intricate Design Pipe Lines Supervision
$ 25,000 or less
8.40
6.72
2.10
50,000
7.84
6.27
1.96
75,000
7.52
6.02
1.88
100,000
7.20
5.76
1.80
200,000
6.56
5.25
1.64
300,000
6.08
4.86
1.52
400,000
5.84
4.67
1.46
500,000
5.6o
4.48
1.40
600,000
5.48
4.38
1.37
700,000
5.36
4.29
1.34
800,000
5.24
4.19
1.31
900,000
5.12
4.10
1.28
1,000,000
5.00
4.00
1.25
Where the estimated or actual cost of the engineering work falls between
two of the amounts listed in the fee scale, the percentage fee to be paid
shall be interpolated between the aforesaid amounts.
Should all of the work as covered in the report be authorized
for design at one time, then the County will receive a credit for the
full amount paid for the report at the time of payment for such design
in accordance with the above schedule.
Should only a portion of the work covered by the preliminary
report be authorized for design or the project designed in two or more
stages, then the fee for each portion or stage of the work shall be
based on the construction cost of such portion or stage. In such ease,
a credit will be made in the fee for an amount paid for the preliminary
report in the ratio of the amount of work authorized to be designed to
that covered in the preliminary report.
Should design of all or any portion of the work be authorized
and then at the completion thereof for any reason the work is not let to
M
M
Attne.,
Mr. M.WO Burnett
Page #3 May 10., 1955
contract within 60 days then the fee shall be payable and shall be based
on the estimated cost of the work and adjusted in accordance with actual
cost when construction contract is let*
The above figures do not include resident supervision of
construction. If resident supervision of construction is desired, we
will furnish such services at actual salary cost plus $25-00 per month
per man to cover insurance, Social Security., et cetera. Should the
County so desire, it can provide its own resident supervision.
General supervision fees are shown in the preceding tabulation.
This portion of the fee is payable monthly in proportion to the progress
of construction.
The above fees do not include surveys for real estate acquisition
or rights -of -way but assistance will be rendered as to property to be
acquired.
It is our understanding that the Engineers will have available
to them any information in the hands of the County pertaining to the
problem at hands
We would like to handle this work for you and if awarded the
commission assure you of our full cooperation to the best interests of
the County. We agree to push the work so as to relieve the presently
critical points as soon as possible*
Respectfully.9
R. Stuart Royer & Associates
By:
Edward H. Ruehl
GOOD WIN PLUMBING CO.
We Sell - Seu-&e "d 9ndtull
PLUMBING, HEATING AND APPLIANCES
721 WEST BROADWAY PHONE 861 RES. 3501
HOPEWELL, VIRGINIA
May 21, 1955
Chesterfield County Offices
Chesterfield Court House
Virginia
ATTENTION: Mr. Burnette
Dear Sir,
Recently, I applied for a building permit to repair the old
Eyler Store, on the Hundreds Road. In order to do a good job, I
found it necessary to tear down the East section of the building and
rebuild same.
It appears that the building is about 21 too close to the
Hundreds Road to comply with the present building code. In view of
the fact that the building will remain the same distance from the
road, as before, and is being rebuilt on the same foundation, I
hope that you will see fit to request the Hoard of Supervisors to
permit me to vary from the code and proceed with the work, as
planned.
Yours truly,
i
Le B. Goodwin
"IS AOUWWO %bj# the W . "Y of
Party or tb* first P • h '*lmftor mt*rv" to as Itho 10"m-
slog of WA Staup POM' of wo parts hornets r mf
to as tho ecow*y-
MTNA8TS
► he " .COMMY# tx'WM of lMd to
Into TIUMPe O the s"OS
of +"d a tft4 t 4rO *010 by a Ti tt rc oO rd d to PlU ftok
in The * arti a of tho aft QOW% Of "Id
Countyl
V
vqvlT syst to O*m tU am e los" s"A tie nett$ md ter
"+ subdIVILSIfto
hex deressoA o" "t or the VAS Of Oft ftLlw (41040)
In *0 Oath to tho ovors, tho pertlof bers" do Owwomat &A Op"
as Ths
1 • n of vw emu" or a pormis by
tit comtT to 00 the "astmetion O stem
AMA vw "Oration 0" of a" systm by 'tom domft3r
mfl *r the U%Wferr * fAIM as )"Wotmeflor mot farms, the oorpo
us"* vout pmp has
to r in WXI1TT t r emosto met twth by
fly .. �#.. ► ♦kAwA mwb&A "mw* ► .k ul 1 U. 4.
polo" A~ ; how` Perioc, Tho
said,to 1
' Owl �,O
s aoxdawo with 041flowA*i for" by the
%r* Tho diis to boft 4e sit SAS* line or
At PIOUMSILO took.of to roqwtrod by tho jVM6
°` , ► 4 M"W c ;fit vork sk&U bo
or A.tu .
of torte is ftwoved by uw ftwoy or Its 44Y OMWrlsod
0
In Pod - oftditUm "d gAw or sv. tber la"
UP" 1wouis 0.
AfVw o d r IStbo 01
of*. tb# *tar 44U bwvo owasslv*two ud soutovaOver ,
o ls"*r MM r~ *Ad At sho 'duo at
bet 1 *t sb# + �►
o AU ��41 l6ligto hr toy Us
64 to ponsittod
040007"d b7 tb4l ORMOY Md no s o"A to rower", .
. r hour of tho ftb"VU"k kom os N*mom
v"bytu "
wi .. ,,! `i-.,�.�,.e �.=:�W►.. �'+�e:,. ri.Y.,r.i..ti.....s rarw:'..w.,...�. .a.. _.. .�....
�* o 40, • VAW
tw It an "r Of sir iscow*s +t
y in so 1W smbs a► r # # follum duo to i s
sp�tsl,1'Y��r�s ;
raesie ►
in in—mo i
is *ay s is Ies bobW by
its -pft"ant > M a by Its
am eismou*tits" f*r bs t.
s Of or ftorviews im its hors
s "to"" by JK* 1t* tf4* Its Got**
Attost►s
CUT Of * Wit;
lb
J2,1
`III/ 1*
400
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
IRVIN G. HORNER, CHAIRMAN
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
M. W. BURNETT RAYMOND J. BRITTON
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY MANCHESTER DISTRICT
ROBERT O. GILL
MATOACA DISTRICT
HAROLD T. GOYNE
�.{
BERMUDA DISTRICT
April 279 1955 .TAMES P. GUNTER
MIOLOTHIAN DISTRICT
STANLEY R. HAGUIC, JR.
DALE DISTRICT
Honorable Board of Supervisors
County of Chesterfield, Virginia
Gentlemen:
A conference was held at the Richmond Quartermaster Depot on
Apt- 5. 1955 at the request of the District Engineer, Corps of Engineers,
Norfolk District. Enclosed herewith is a resume of this conference, in-
dicating the various problems discussed.
The purpose of this 1
tions of Falling Creek. Since
as one of its sources of water
in the cost of constructing an
upstream above the County's Fa
determine the flow of water in
area. Mr. Don Wallace, who ho
was present at the conference*
would share 50% of the cost of
onference was to discuss stream flow condi-
the County of Chesterfield uses this stream
supply, the County is being requested to share
operating an additional stream gaging station
ling Creek Reservoir. This gaging station will
o the reservoir from the Falling Creek watershed
do the U. S. Geological Survey in this area,
It would be his. recomendation that the U.S.G*So
operating this stream gage station.
The Richmond Quartermaster Depot is taking the necessary steps
prior to constructing a new stream gaging station just East of U.S. Route 1
on Falling Creek. The total cost of this stream gage station would be paid
by Richmond Quartermaster Depot. With the present gaging station located near
the Chesterfield County Filter Plant being retained, a complete picture of all
flows in Falling Creek would be obtained.
With the raw water situation being what it is and the proposed ex-
pansion that is now under consideration, it is recammended by the writer that
the Utilities Department share in the construction and operation of an addition-
al stream gage station as indicated in the attached sketch. The County's
participation would be in the amount of $887.00 for the initial construction
outlays and $262.00 per Year for the cost of operation.
If the Board of Supervisors so desires, Mr. Don Wallace of the
U.S.G.S, has stated that he would be happy to appear before the Board to
present their view points on this matter.
With the critical stream flow season now at hand. I would
appreciate your early comment.
Very truly yours,
George D. Shropshire
County Engineer
GDS :tad
Encl. - 2
WNU
P'•nPCLSu��
.9�'1 L�,�}`-. T.4 Tla.<�U G•✓'r4.C.,e. /l I�.
r-i 4.1 r / & S
co., Y,�.
•C0PI
n
Q2EX
n
C2EX
QMDRE 671.1
SUBJECT: Water Supply Problems on Falling Creek
TO: Commanding General
HeAdquarters Second Army
Fort George G. Meade, Maryland
ATTN : AIA.ENEU
6 April 1933
1. Transmitted herewith for your information is the resume of a con-
ferenoe held in this office on 5 April 1955 at the request of the District
Engineer, Norfolk District. In view of Paragraphs 10 and 11 of Inclosure 1
and the cooperative attitude that was evident on the part of the Chesterfield
County Engineer, it is recommended that final legal action against the County
of Chesterfield be deferred.
2. Information pertaining to the availability of funds for the con-
struction and maintenance of gages referred to in paragraph 8 of Inclosure 1
is requested.
3. Mr. Wallace of the U. S. Geological Survey Office in Charlottes-
ville expressed a possibility that the existing recording gage located below
the County dam may have to be abandoned. This may be necessary as a com-
bined result of insufficient funds and because this station no longer serves
the purpose for which it was originally established. However, in view of
probable legal action with the County of Chesterfield and an increasing de-
mand from water users located between the Depot dam and the dames River, it
is recommended that steps be taken immediately to provide funds for the con-
tinued maintenance of this gage and the construction and maintenance of an
additional gage referred to in paragraph 6c of Inclosure 1.
4. A request for the stud referred to in paragraph 9 of Inclosure 1
is being prepared and will be submitted for necessary action. Approximately
$59000.00 was expended during the summer of 1953 to remove accumulated
leaves and silt from the Depot Reservoir. From all indications, this clean-
ing operation will have to be repeated during the near future unless other
steps are taken to insure the impoundment of an adequate supply of water.
FOR THE CCMb1NDING OFFICER:
1 Incl-
Resume of Conf (in dup)
R:(BEBT A. EVANS
Capt., C.T.
Post Engineer
Copies furnished
District Engineer, Norfolk District
U.S. Geological Survey, Charlottesville, Va.
Mr. Geo. D. Shropshire, Engr., County of Chesterfield, Va.
WATER SUPPLY PRtBLEHS ON FALLING CREEK
1. A conference was held in the office of the Post Engineer, Richmond
Quartermaster Depot, on txesday, 5 Apt 1955• Present were:
,George D. Shropshire
D. S. Wallace
D. F. Dougherty
R. R. Barton
H. J. Fine
R. E. Peters
Engineer, Chesterfield County
U. S. Geological Survey
U. S. Geological Surety
Engineer, RQMD
Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers
2. Water SunD3.v in summer of 1955. The amicable relationship between
the M needs of Chesterfield County and RQMD was satisfactory in supplying
the water needs of RQMD after the opening of a valve in the Chesterfield County
Dam, thereby permitting a downstream release of water of the order of 250,000
gallons per day. Those present agreed that a similar operation would satisfy
the requirements during the sm mer of 1955, The Chesterfield County Reservoir
will release downstream water required to meet the needs of the RQMD barring a
drought of unusual. proportions. It is believed that this arrangement should
prove satisfactory until more firm commitaents can be crystallized for the ac-
complishment of the construction of gages and other suggestions which follow.
3. F"uosed County survey of water sunnly reguirements and needs. Mr.
Shropshire indicated that plans are underway by the County to hire a firm of
engineers to study the future water supply requirements of the County and
methods of providing the needs. This will include a study of the Falling
Creek watershed. It is expected that the study will be initiated in may 1955•
An effort will be made to have construction of additional water supply faci-
lities underway in the spring of 1956.
4. It is anticipated that the firm of engineers will give due considera-
tion to the needs of downstream water supply users such as RQMD. Mr. Shrop-
shire expressed a willingness to the engineers of RQrM to keep thew informed
on the progress of the study and of the findings thereof.
5. Construction and maintenance of gages. Mr. Wallace indicated the need
for a gage on Falling Creek upstream from the County Reservoir in order to
determine the inflow to this reservoir. Some discussion ensued relative to the
continued maintenance of the existing gage downstream from the County Reservoir
and also a gage below the RQMD dam.
6. Information from these gages Would make it possible to ascertain the
following:
a. Falling Creek gage upstream from the County Reservoir, plus a
few low water measurements on Pocoshock Creek, would enable a
determination of the inflow to this reservoir.
*10
b. Falling Creek gage downstream from the County Reservoir fur.
nishes dat; as to the outflow from. the County Reservoir.
c. Falling Creek gage downstream from the RQMD dam would furnish
data as to the outflow from this dam.
7. Mr. Shropshire was of the opinion that the County is primarily
interested in the gage in paragraph 6a above. RAID is primarily interested in
the gages in paragraph 6 b and c above. Mr. Wallace was of the opinion that
the existing gage in paragraph 6b above should continue to be maintained. All
agreed that all of the gages referred to above, because of the large invest-
ment in funds and increasing complexity of water problems in the future, are
desirable for a complete analysis of the water situation on Falling Creek.
8. The following distribution of construction and maintenance costs,
based on estimates prepared by the U. S. Geological Survey, are recommended
for the gages referred to above:
Allocation of Cost
Gages USGS County R2M Total
Gaging Station above
RQMD Dam
a. Cost of construction
and lst year's main-
tenance $887.00 $887.00 $700.00 $2,474.00
b. Maintenance cost in
future years 262.00 262.00 700.00 19224.00
Gage downstream from
RQMD
a. Cost of construction
and lst year's main-
tenance -- 20200.00 20200.00
b. Maintenance cost in
future years -- -- 900.00 900.00
9. Desirability of increasing storage in RCM reservoir: RQMD indi-
cated the desirability of a study to increase the storage of its data at nim-
inal cost. Mr. Barton was not certain of the economic possibility of cleaning
out the Reservoir. The matter will be referred by RQM to the Norfolk Us-
trict for study.
IW-40
M
M
10. Legal Action: Those present agreed that recourse to legal action
be taken only as a last resort. It was the consensus of opinion that the
mutual benefits to be attained from action by Chesterfield County and RQW
would be more than offset by the ill will to be generated, and by the future
uncooperative attitude that will be instilled in the engineers on both sides.
Furthermore, it is believed that the results of any legal action, including
appeals to higher courts, would take a number of years to resolve the Case
in question.
11. For the above reasons, it is believed that legal recourse should
be considered only after (a) the existing agreement for the supply of water
to RQM during the suemer of 1955 is not fulfilled, (b) the report of the
consulting engineers referred to in paragraph 3 above does not adequately
consider the water supply needs of all users, and (a) all efforts for
reconciliation of future problem between Chesterfield County and RAID can
not be resolved otherwise.
- 3 -
•�
� - � .. �. �.__ k
Q
-------------
o�,. cr'
e�son-:)e/ G�sT
D/7 Qerson�C/GD3T �70( OV�I-'/�C�`
i
A/61 7Z To C �c C c C cal Z..vcoo
7pTd/
2. ,; �� �r � ors �r-�t c �iG►n ,o%sue �
s� cr.isVo .hasec/
on f _O.OD oeo
8 /� d t/77i 1Cc�t 7� C�GPrS/�^j r? S
�'.
2ce aoo
'; J�/BOG•
C�;c r7cra
�uoes�-vision
Ive
ao
Sa o -.
m
�k/c-Am.,< S
�' eci Tic.�7�•ioi7S f ��� `y cnr��
c�perris o of o� / Doo, gnea
Tn c �L�c-s Au.r•, .s'�3� ors �
r /
n
�o
S�5, Coo_"
�f doe
7,;7
0.7 000� c000 ¢ ZSo ca
A��- J-t,� �= 4
�f7o�G evcr�.�4
On cc
Goy Gci^ n/•�A �/,Ocr
.s cil lria
�c o 7/7 74. --4aeS
PHONE 82.2344
`'%Ire►' 1140
LYTTLE & BARNES CONSTRUCTION CO.
Contractors
SEWERS - WATER LINES - SEWERAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS
OFFICE AND PLANT P. o. BOX 4205
BELT BOULEVARD AND HOPKINS ROAD RICHMOND 24, VIRGINIA
May 10, 1955
County of Chesterfield
Utilities Dept.
Chesterfield, Va.
Attention: Mr. George Shropshire
Dear Sir:
We take pleasure in quoting you a price of $11,200.00 on complete
installation of approximately 7,400 lineal feet of 8" transite water
main alon Petersburg Pike as per Plans and Specifications dated
April 12, 1955.
The above quotation includes all necessary materials and labor
required to make this installation, not furnished by Chesterfield
County.
The above quotation also includes furnishing all necessary materials
and labor to drill under A. C. L R/R as indicated on plans, not furnished
by Chesterfield County.
Hoping that we may be of service to you, we are
Sincerely yours,
LYTTLE & BARNES CONSTRUCTION CO.
May 10, 1955
County of Chesterfield
Utilities Dept.
Chesterfield, Va.
Attentions Mr. Ge Shropshire
Dear Sirs
Wo take pleasure in quoting you a price of $11,200.00 on complete
installation of apprdximtely 7#400 lineal feet of 8" trankite water
meIln alon Petersburg Pike as per Plans and Specifications dated
April 12, 1955.
The above quotation includes all necessary materials and labor
required to make this installation, not furnished by Chesterfield
County.
The above quotation also includes furnishing all necessary materials
and labor to drill under A* C. L R/R as indicated on plans, not furnished
by Chesterfield County.
Hoping that we may be of service to you, we are
Sincerely yours,
LYTTLL 8 BARNES OONSTRUCTWN CO.
n
The Etna Casualty and Surety Company
Hartford, Connecticut
Wtwtu All Am hu il4v a lIrrattt
That we, ..... L.Y.ttjt. k. Barnes - Consiruct o? .. 4 t., .. I IC � .......................................................................................
.........................Richmond,...Virginia.----••----•-----••--•-------........-----..............----..........................................---•------------...........•--
as Principal(s) (hereinafter called the Principal), and THEfTNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY,
of Hartford, Connecticut, a corporation of the State of Connecticut, as Surety (hereinafter called the Surety), are
held and firmly bound unto ...... bibles:terfield..Uounty.--Board-.oi-Supervisors -------------------••----------------------••----
---------------------- C,heetergiel-d---Caun4,-.-Virginia.....
in the penal sum of .------A .-pAr .. cent -..of ..bidbid ...............
............................ (hereinafter called the Obligee)
--------------------------------------------------• ($..... b%--of-..WA-)
Dollars, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors,
successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
Sealed with our seals this .-••--•.............1Qth--•-.. day of .......... May ------------------------------- 19.-.SS,
Whereas, said Principal is submitting herewith a bid, or proposal, for .... Coil$_fir-ructIon.-of-.81!..wa.ter.--
line extension along-Petersburg._Pike.. Chesterfield__!%=.ty.,-_Vi:rgi.nia-----------------
--------------------------------------------
Now, Therefore, the condition of this obligation is such That if said Principal shall be awarded
the contract which said Principal has proposed to undertake, briefly described above, and shall, within the time
allowed after notice of such award, enter into contract pursuant to such award and give bond for the faithful per-
formance of the contract, then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force
and effect.
Provided, However, That this Bond is issued subject to the following condition:
The Surety shall in no event be liable for a greater amount hereunder than the difference between the amount
of the PrincipaPs bid or proposal, and the lowest amount in excess of said bid, or proposal, for which said Obligee
may be able to award said contract within a reasonable time.
...............................................................---(SEAL)
' �� R NWAO03_RX PD
COUNTY ENGINEERS
TDNW _HAMPTON VI R 10 752AME
OF F I CE=S"
. 1
m
TELEGRAM RECEIVED 10:35 A.M., MAY 10, 1955
WE PROPOSE TO INSTALL 7,400 FEET OF 8-INCH WATER LINE ALONG WEST SIDE OF
ROUPE 1 IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AS PER SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUM OF $24,200.00.
BID OPENING 9 A.M.. MAY 10, 1955.
SIGNED: W. H. Wright
WRIGHT PIPE LINE AND CONSTRUCTION CO.
1925 KECOUGHTAH ROAD
HAMPTON, VIRGINIA.
ij
M
M
%y 9, 1955
To: Honorable Board of Supervisors
County of Chesterfield
Chesterfield, Va. �,tr�f`
lie, The undersigned, residents of Winfree Streets Bermuda. District, Chester,
Virginia Believe the water service supplild to this area, by the County, is
inadequate and insufficient to furnish the necessary water required for ordinary
home consumption and respectfully request the Board to immediately remedy this
condition#
.Also, do not allow any new extensions or connections to the present supply line
serving the area until the inadequate service to this area has been remedied.
NAME
e
l
Respectfully submitted this ` day of
May, 1955.
►AI)I�X0
64)
r '_
This day came Mr.Crump, representing Ns.S.T-Wegstaff, requesting the cl&sino'
of a portion of Powell Road (Bon Air Heights).
_ On motion of Mr.Gunter, seconded'.by Mr.Goyne, it is resolved xxxitkaximix
that a portion of Rowell Road be abandoned.for maintenance.
t.
�I
�I
(Mr. Exec. Se.c'y . please write a letter to Mr. Y@rebea gating him a price
on the improvement of a road of $588,00, from the Highway Department. Reg4est
of Mr. Gunter) .�
The Pv$'td6tLteEdg to&rrVirginia Dept. of Highways, TeLad. a letter from the
Bancroft Construction Company, requesting the approval of culrband gutter
fortes designed 18" instead of 24", same. 'to be installed in. -subdivisions in
Chesterfield County.
On motion of Dr. Gill, seconded by Mr.Britton, it is resolved that this
Board approves 'curb and gutter with 18" lip when installed in subdivisions,in
Chesterfield County.
i
The Executive Secretary read a letter on public landing - matter delayed o
;1
next meetinge
I
Mr. Britton requested the Resident Engineer for e-price on the improvement
of a road off Rt.60, south side. I
Mr. Britton also requested the removal of a trees on Rt. 10, which was dangerous.
Also a letter was presented _from,_Mr, Jxzes R.Condrey eoncerraing work on dooks Redd.
The Resident ! E'ngine.er stated that work cannot be done . on private drives,
li Virginia: At a regular meeting of the
Board of Supervisors cf
Chesterfield County, held at the
j;
Courthouse on May 10, 19559
jj
at 9:30 a.m.
I,
Present
All members
This day came Mr.J.T.Nioore, and the, Board again discussed the matter of
allowing Mr. Moore to move equipment to 'a new site and drill another well
in the subdivision of Beulah Village,. also allowing him to make. a temporary
hook-up to the old well to supply 8 houses already gonstructed, the
Lj same guarantee being given on the .aew well as on the o14.
j! It was agreed that a contract approved by the Board should be signed
4.
I'.
by Mr.Moore, and allow him to connect 8 houses to the old well
�' as a temporary measure.
at 9:30 a.m.
The Executive Secretary opened bids (one bid) on the installati&n
of pipe line on Petersburg Pike, which matter will be taken up later
in the day. • o
; This day came Mr. Biggs and other% residents of the Overstreet subdivision,
near Stop 45, oft' Harrowgate Road, requesting the improvement of a road
i
in this subdivision. On motion of Mr.Goyne, seconded by Mr.Britton,
it is resolved that the Resident Engineer and the County Road Engineer
are requested to a$axag re -survey the road .in question and determine
what the cost of improvement would be, one-half of this cost to be
Ar �� Sj��G�CcG T 7`s %J9�tsic i
T �✓ J - ! • . /fir o v v 'C
/.0;/, .tea �J _
Ccv..5 1 /he,Ae,y
lad lAtI14,
%/7
_/Ziff d_,G..C" _ 02e griJ�fDl,/_.,f'PLdr`ad = _
t✓G_ /Nit► _ C.wf AoleGK,t -74 Qo
6;7 J
'�Y Gil lNa✓�1 � �vLf�{ur� /N+�o�
1J' o A/ %y�' /tee �i•� [ � e�`� a ♦l � c ��rl % htX� ,+y�c
%Y 0 0 2y,�, t
lea ✓- s, Moo, 16rs►f
3s-
m
Ale
/
✓ �r�T1`� yLto ✓S/ _ lte .SeCO1sdS'%
i
{ lr! �tt .w .ir�, l' `t __L✓Pr,�i 7ZW Age/f'O vrr.
C? /
�T�-✓thy u'`.rv-`....' r
I
�CG -� 14'`dl(oL✓a