2010-02-10 PacketCHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1
AGENDA
~„
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 2.A.
Subject:
County Administrator's Report
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
The County Administrator will update the Board on the progress of various
projects as requested by the Board of Supervisors.
Preparers Marilyn Cole
Attachments: ^ Yes
Title: Assistant County Administrator
^ No #
oaooos
County Administrator's
Top 40's List
I.
II.
Critical Proiects/Activities
1. Airport Entrance Improvements
2. Airport Master Plan
3. Amelia Reservoir Project
4. Animal Shelter Issues
5. Bow Hunting Restrictions
6. Census 2010
7. Community Risk Analysis/Emergency Service Coverage
8. Countywide Comprehensive Plan/Public Facilities Plan
9. Eastern Midlothian Re-development
- Chippenham Square
- Spring Rock
- Stonebridge (formerly Cloverleaf Mall)
- Streetscaping
10. Hydrilla Issue
11. Irrigation Policies/Demand Management for Water Use
12. 2010 Legislative Program
13. Low Impact Development Standards
14. Magnolia Green CDA
15. Mass Grading Ordinance
16. Meadowville Interchange
17. Midlothian Turnpike/Courthouse Road Streetscape Improvements (Towne Center)
18. North American Project (at Rt. 288 and Rt. 10)
19. Postal Zip Codes
20. Private Sewer Treatment Facility
21. Sign Ordinance
22. Sports Tourism Plan
23. Streetlight Policy
24. Ukrops Kicker Complex/Poseidon Swimming -Stratton Property
25. Utilities Policies and Managed Growth
26. Watkins Centre
27. Woolridge Road Reservoir Crossing Project
28. Wind Energy Systems
Ongoing Proiects/Activities
1. Capital Improvement Program
2. Capital Regional Collaborative Focus Group
3. Citizen Budget Advisory Committee
4. Efficiency Studies -Countywide
5. Federal Stimulus Package
- Energy Block Grant
- Economic Development
- Police Department
- Recovery Zone Bonds
0~0~~~
Page 1 of 4 Updated - 2/4/10
County Administrator's
Top 40's List
III.
6. Financial/Budget Issues
7. Fort Lee Expansion
8. In-Focus Implementation -Phase II (Payroll/HR)
9. Joint Meetings of Board of Supervisors/School Board
10. RMA Work Group
11. RRPDC -Large Jurisdiction Committee
12. RRPDC -Transportation Strategies Work Group (work on hold)
13. UASI (Regional)
14. Upper Swift Creek Water Quality Ordinances
Completed Proiects/Activities
1. Board's Appointments Process
2. Business Climate Survey
3. Cash Proffers
4. CBLAB Discussions
5. Citizen Satisfaction Survey
6. COPS Grants
7. Efficiency Studies -Fire Department and Fleet Management
8. Efficiency Study -Quality/Chesterfield University Consolidation
9. Electronic Signs
10. Board's Emergency Notification Process
11. Employee Health Benefits -Contract Renewal
12. Financial/Budget Issues
- Adoption of 2010 Budget
- Adoption of County CIP
- Adoption of School CIP
- Bond Issue/Refinancing
- AAA Ratings Retained
13. 457 Deferred Comp Plan (Approved)
14. Hosting of Hopewell Website
15. Impact Fees for Roads
16. In Focus Implementation -Phase I
17. Insurance Service Upgrade (ISO) for Fire Department
18. Leadership Exchange Visits with City of Richmond
19. Legislative Program - 2009
20. Meadowdale Library
21. Minor League Baseball (new team)
22. Multi-Cultural Commission (Quarterly Reports due to Board)
23. Planning Fee Structure (General Increases)
24. Planning Fee Structure (Reductions for In-Home Businesses)
25. Planning Fees (Holiday for Commercial Projects)
26. Potential Legislation -Impact Fees/Cash Proffers
27. Property Maintenance -Proactive Zoning Code Enforcement (countywide)
28. Property Maintenance -Rental Inspection Program
29. Public Safety Pay Plans Implemented (Phase I)
30. Redistricting Calendar/Process Report - 2011 ~'~~0~3
31. Regional Workforce Investment Initiative
Page 2 of 4 Updated - 2/4/10
County Administrator's
Top 40's List
32. Southwest Corridor Water Line
33. Sports Tourism Program with Metropolitan Richmond Sports Backers
34. Ukrops Kicker Complex -soccer fields (opened 8/09)
35. Upper Swift Creek Plan (Adopted)
36. VDOT Subdivision Street Acceptance Requirements
37. Walk Through Building Permit Process
38. Website Redesign
39. Wireless Internet Access in County Facilities
000004
Page 3 of 4 Updated - 2/4/10
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1
AGENDA
~r,
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 6.A.
Subject:
Work Session on Projected Revenues for the FY2011 Budget
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
The Board is requested to hold a work session to review projected revenues
for the Proposed FY2011 Budget.
Summary of Information:
A work session to review revenues for the Proposed FY2011 Budget has been
scheduled for this date. Staff will present information on the economy and
the impact on revenues.
The County Administrator's overall proposed budget will be presented on March
8t'' Work sessions on the proposed budget will take place over the next two
months.
A copy of the presentation is attached.
Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Mana eq ment
Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No #
000045
0
0
N
w
0
7
L
.Q
d
~VO~'l~
~i
O
H
O
._
~+
.~
O
V
V
.~
O
O
V
W
~~
•.+
H
V
i
O
.v
O
O
V
W
N
d
V
C
i
O
d
d
..
H
3
~+
3
O
V
M
H
H
i
3
O
r~
3
N
N
H
O
~+
H
.~
H
H
V
O
i
~+
m
to
~~o
~ ~ ~~ ~~o
~ c ~ _ °
i ~ ~ ~
.~
L
~ ~ ~ ~ L
.~
Y/ ~ N N O r
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v V
._ N
= 3 v p
._
~~ ~~ Lea a~N
~p o = o `~~ ~~a
ch O p W t
J
,... .~ ~
v ~,
~~3 ~'
~o~ ~~
u~
v ~
vi
~ ~~~ ~
~~~~~~~
c o~~~ ~
~,~~~~~~
~~
G ~ ~ ~ O d y~~f!"lNfOrNI'7~~~h
=~
=~
_~
ti
0
W
1
®~ 0
O
O
O
N
00
O
O
N
ti
O
O
N
000009
v
~+
~+
L
J
O
c~
i
m
di
v
3
O
?~.
0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0
O O O O O O O
~ N O CO c0 et N
r r r
IA
O
O~
C7
O
O
N
00
O
_
L
O
O O
N
O ~ ,~ ~`
O
O
~ L
~ d
~
, N
t0 L
~
_ H
O 1~ O
N
..
~ ~
; y ~:r ~
..
O
d 0
Z .a
~ ~ d
3 L ~ o
~ N
d
H =
3 ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
O
=
V t v
L N
~"' y M
O
O
N =
p
•
~
- -
~ ,.,
_,,_ _ _... N •~
O
., ~ w N U
r
O ~+
C
~
N ~
O ~
O W
O O O O O
' O O O O N
~
00 1` ~O ~!
~ ~ M N ~ O .~
area
~uaua/(o~duaaun L_
m
0
m
00~ = 996~~~~ :s~ana~ xapui
O~
O
O
N
00
O
O
N
ti
O
O
N
Cfl
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
N
M
O
O
N
0000'1
O O O O O O O O
~ O ~ 000 ti ~ tO!! ~
r r
s~!un ~o suo!II!~
O
O
O
N
CO
O
O
N
ti
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
N
M
O
O
N
N
O
O
N
r
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
0~0~~2
O O O O O
N N ~ O tt'!
07
O
O
N
ti
O
O
N
O
O
N
M
O
O
N
r
O
O
N
O
O~
O~
ti
C7
O~
r
to
O~
O~
r
a~®®~.a~
O O O O O O
t~ O t~ O ~
w w w ~
N N r r
~ ~ 'y o
v o ~ a
'~~~E
i W ~ v
~y~o
_.~~~
i ~_~
L ~~
~ ~ '~ ~
i~ y ~
~uaua/Co~duaa ui sso~ ,~o uisfi ~ua~aad
O
N
00
r
t~
r
r
N
0
co
N
O
N
1
1
O
r
r
r
r
r
d
N
~`~I
N
N
tb
N
t
O
O
L
0000.4
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O O
O O ~ M N r O
O
o ~n o
o o~ o ~n o ~n o u~ o ~n c~ ~n o
r ~- ~ rn ~ ao 0o ti ti: o co Sri u~ ~ ~t ~
c~
U
^ ~
~ °~
v ~?
~o
r
..
c
as
d
a
0
N
N
r
CV
r
r
N
O
r
0
CA
O
O
00
O
0
N
ti
0
O
fV
p~
O
RI
0
rn
c
.~
E
.~'
O
Z
12
v
C~
m
c
c
as
...
n~
c
as
. ~t
.r
d
_o
U
O
0
z
o u7 0 ~n o u~ o u~ o ~n o u~ o u7 0~
o 0 of of o0 0o ti ti ca t~ Sri u i ~r ~
0~®015
d
io
i
m
m
ai
0
r
r
k
1
~ ~' ,
C
O Q
D
as
0
O~
a "'
m N
H
\°
~:+ °
~ ~
~ O
L
V
K
+~+ ~
N
V
O
n
C
\°
0
N
co
M
~~D~:L6
a~
V
C
.a
C
C
7
V
H
O
~+
+~
m
.~
0
O
N
Li.
C
O
ev
m
O =
O '-
_ ~
O ~
•.+ V ~
•~ ~'
Q. L
O
V ~ ~
cv
• > M
a
.
.~
~ ~
~
d ~ ~
~ ~
.
V
~
~
L
~ ~ ~
~
i
,~ ~
~
~ L
.O
= 'O Q.
Q
to
~
O-
L O
• ~ .N ~
~
~ O
~ a
~
~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~
L
O
~
•
`}"~ _
•~
O
~
L
awn
L
~
~
s
~..r
~
N ~
= ~
V
~
~ .~
V
Q.
• ~ ~ ~ N
0000'L'7
N
r
09
r
C
LL
i
d
C
'Lr
r
r
O
N
07
O
O
N
O
O
N
O
O
N
N
M
O
O
N
r
O
O
N
O
O~
O
r
®'~~~:L~
~+
O
~+
m
m
m
.+
O
C
7
C
i
V
H
a.
N
'~
t
's,
u
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O O
CO N 00 ~ O ~ 00
r r ~
r
a6uey~ ~ua~aad - sa~iad auaoH
0 0 0 0 0 0
o •
o ~ c 0 0 o ~ o
N r r ~ C ~ ~ ~ N
xapu ~ /(}i ~ igepao}~d
O~
O
O
N
ti
O
O
N
~~'!
O
O
N
M
O
O
N
r
O
O
N
O~
O
07
r
ti
O~
O~
r
fit!
O
d7
r
M
O~
O
Cfl r
O
00®01.9
et M N r r O DO 1`
r r r r O O O
IA
!`
\°
0
O
00
o ~
O O
~ O
O
O
~
A ~ O
d'
3
~
d
_
~~
C
Y
\ M
>
. O
> ~ O
a
3 M ~
N
, M
d A
~.+
~ ~~
>
.~ ~
~
= v
W O O
.E G7
°~\j N
o
' o
N
\°
o
r Y
O
C7
~
~
N O
O
r
O
r
V
~~~0~'~
~"
~+
H
~ ~
O ~
= H
~~
.~ ~
~ ~
~ d
d~
. H
= H
•- 'O
N .
3 s°
as ~
= H
00
os
'- 3
~_
3
i
81
O
a
O
a
c -~
c
3
O
3
0
N
M
N
~O
M
N
0~0.
O
..
~•
O
O
N
0
N
ti
°o
N
co
O
O
N
0
0
N
0
0
N
000021
ti
r
~ ° ~ Q
~~ ~ o
O ~
0 ° ° ~
^^ t0 N ^^
N r
~ ~
~_
~L
L
V
00
N
.~.
L
O
C
L
V
d
V
~~
d
~.
\°
0
M
ti
\°
0
N
r
`~
.~
0
CO
ti
\°
0
M
00
L
.~
O~~oi~iZ
r
a~uey~ ~ua~aad
r
r
O
N
07
O
O
N
O
O
N
at!
O
O
N
M
O
O
N
r
N
00003
~+
v
m
~O
L
Q
L
m
L
0
N
0 ~ ~ ~ 0
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
0 ~ 0
N r r ~ r r-
r
a6uey~ ~ua~aad
r
r
O
N
O
r
O
N
O~
O
O
N
00
O
O
N
ti
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
N
~~®~~~
•+
V
m
~O
fl.
L
m
0
N
O O O O O O O
O O ~ M N r
O
O
N
0 0 0 0 0 0
ems- ems- r eN- r ~ ~ oa0 ~ COO lL~ ~ ~ N ~ O
N
j C -;
~ CL ~
m
v
'c
CL
t
m
O
C
N
C
U
r
O
N
0
0
N
0
0
0
N
CO
O
a
N
pNp
C]
N
O
O
O
N
O
m
CTS
T
(~
'~"'
T
a
C'3~
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ ~ C'7 N r' O O p0 It CO ~ ~ C'7 N r
r e- r e- r r
0~®0~5
m
~Q
ti
m
V
L
N
C~
._
d-
~m
~ O
Z ~
VN
'~ d
d
d ~
~O >
L Q
L
d
.~
am
= a~
'- O
d0
= N
V
A
H
d
V
Z
\°
0
00
O
r
0
ti
r
Y
L
t
J
\°
0
O~
N
a
N
r
V
C
O
N
L
a
~~OQ~6
m
3
C
i
O
0
N
,~
v
N
N
~+
C
~ L
~ ~ N =
~
N
~ ._
3
,=
~
.o ~
~ ~
~ ~,
=
a
O
H c
N
~ ~
~ .
~
O ~ ~ ~ ~ O
N v ~ i ~ N
sae~~op ~o suoi~~iua
r
r
O
N
O
O
O
N
ti
O
O
N
O
O
N
0
N
r
O
O
N
~'~~o~~
0
L
d
L
r
O
N
tL
C
l~
O
0
N
O O O O O O O O O
Cfl to ~ ~ ~ M M N N
M
N
O
L 3 ;
.~
a ~ o
z
~ O ~ ;
~ ~
~=
O O
L
~
~
'L
~
~ ~
O ~
`~ ~
+
~+ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ .
O = i
aBuey~ ~ua~aad ,~ea~C-aano-,~ea~C
C7
O
O
N
00
O
O
N
ti
°o
N
0
0
N
0
0
N
0000~~
O O O O O O O O O O O O
. . . . . . . . . . .
~ O 00 c0 et' N O N ~ c0 00 O
'~
N
^
^
^
L
y
3
.~
~+
O
y
~L
v
O
O
M
00
O
M
N
L
U
c
a~
U
L
^~
A
O
N
U
.~
a~
\°
0
~O
N
L
~_
L
LL
\°
0
a
.~
L
~1~
U
\°
0
O
L
f+
~~
000029
IA
N
aBuey~ }ua~aad aea~C-aano-aea/C
r
r
O
N
Q~
O
O
N
ti
O
O
N
to
O
O
N
M
O
O
N
0
O
N
~n®De,3~
?.'
O
.p
m
.+
v
m
~O
L
a
m
L
r
O
N
C
O
0
N
LL
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
O O O O O O O O O O
O 00 tC ~ N C N ~ CC 00
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
t0
N
~.+
d
v
L
,,A~
Y/
r
N
L
wv
W
w~
W
.~
L
Q.
N
~+
.Q'
L
LL
_~
C~
O
N
V
O
N
.Q
O
LL
N
L
.~
O
t
N
L
f+
V
L
V
L
._
L
O
J
0
m
~-
M
N
sasllop ~o suoilliw
O
r
O
N
0
0
N
O
O
N
O
N
O
O
N
000031
a~
~°
v
O
L
a
i
O
N
C
0
0
N
LL
O O O O O O O
07 00 I` ~O to '~ M
r r r r r r r
IN
as
= o
= 00
N
O
r
r
O N
N ti
O
5
0
N ~
~ ~
CC
C
N o
`~`
w/
W
L
O
V
0
O
M
00
O
r
G
L
00
._
G
0
N
M
N
C
M
L
r~1
r
r
C
r
C
r
f+
C
L
N~
1.6
L
/~
V
~~~®.32 ~
C
m
L
V
t
C
w
0
m
L
z
m
c
m
m
L
_~
V
_C
Q
Z
N
~ o
~ M ~
~ N
~ N
O
r
r
N
LL
0
r
N
LL
CO
6~
EA
ti
M
EA
ti
3
N
L
a
e~
N
~~~//
Li
N
d
c
cv
.~
L
a
O
M
O
O~
N
O~
N
N
ea
U
d
v
.~
®~®033
IN
0 0 0 o a o 0
r. co ~ ~' cYi N r
0
o
+ o
N
i0
~ ~
i ~
~ ~
il~}
~
v ~ O
~
C
._ ~~
~ •
,~+ ~ ~
N
i ~' ; ~
~ r ~ m
~
~ L ~
~ ~ ~ f~, I
I
f
4 6
~,
Y
V
U a~
4
1
1
1~
f
1
^
O O O O O O
0
0
a
N
O
N
Y
O O
~ Q
t~~00341
/1~1~
I '
_ ~f
..1
t
Y
1
~ y
I i(¢
~~
m
c
m
d
N
di
~M
W
w~
W
L
0
O
N
O
O
N
O
~+
V
0
co
M
0
m
M
O
L
a
0
L
a
.-.
O
a
m
as
d
V
J
.y
m
0
0
i
O
v
0
V
v~
0
o~
0
.~
00003
!"
M
V
O
v
L
.~
0
rr_.
.- ~.
r
0
0
N
wO
W
~+
V
0 0
O N N
N
~
1`
~.
1~ O M
~ ~
... ~
~!!
00
~
~ ~
N ~ N
~ ~ ~
Q
0
a
o
`
w ~ a
O L
_ L
a a O
\°
0
N
N
~-.
O
r
6f~
...
ea
W
L
a
0
N
r
N
r
b~
N
L
~°
C
a~
OJ00~6
N
d
V
O
v
L
.~
O
~~
r
r
0
N
O
r
O
N
O
V
~!~!
ti
O
...
r
M
a~
00
M
N
U
L
V
N~
I.I
0
00
t0
.~.
ti
N
6f~
...
'~
N
V
L
.~
~~'!
M
M
v
c
c~
M~
W
~.~.
l~lv®o~
.~
3
H
v
3
O
0
0
0
O
co
U
N
c
X
W
0
O
N
c
O
U
'~
N
y
~.r
H
3
.~,
'~
a
H
O
~.
i
.~.
° o 0
o 0
~ o0 00
°° ~ ti
N N M
~ N ~
~ ~ ~
...
c
o ~~
~
a
W L
L
~ O
~L
~ a
~
_
~
~ ~
~
cv
~ O
O
v
tq
~
v
O ~
+ d
~
J ~ ~
O
O
O
0
N
6F}
^~
W
U
C
W
N
N
N
Q'~®®~~
3 O
~ a O
o
o ~ ~
~ Z = ~
t~
~ ~ ~
~ W ~ O
~ O ~~
o p v ~
v ~ _
~ _ ~ ~O
O ~ ~
.~ ~
~ H
L H •
~ ~ ~;, ~
> v H
~ i i
~ ~ O
!~ ~ ~ _
~ ~ ~ ~
~ O ~
H ~ 3 ~ _
~ _ ~ i i
= O ~ ~
.~ ~ L ~ H
H ~ ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ _ ~
~ p ~ ~ p ~
~~ ~~ -~
o O ~ ~' i ~
tA~ =i ~H
~ N M
_~
^
y
~O
.~ v
V 3 ~ H
~ ~ ._ _
s
_y ~ ~ .~
O ~ ~
~ ~~ ~ ~
_ ~ ~
v •-
~ H ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
_ _ ~ fr
!~ ~ - ~
~ ~
•+ ~ ~ ~
_ ~ _ ~
O ~ ~
v O ~ ~
i ~
.. ~ y ~
= f_+ ~~ H
H ~ O
~ ~ ~
L ,v to
_=
~ ~ ~ 3
H ~ ~ H
._ ._
Q to 1~ i
~ ~
00039
! i
i_ ;: ~
~ ~ ~ ~~
~ _.'"~~
~ ~ ; __
.nl O
. .j ~~~-~
~r;
~ ~
- ~ ~~
~1
~;
X
N
s
~ ~
N L
a
tQ ~
i ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
c~.
N
N
~ ~
~ Q
O
~ .~
~
~
s ~
. ~
~
~
= Q ~
V ~ ~
L ~ ~
~
U O
~.
x
h
.~
.U
N~
s ~
V ~''
i ~
m
,s
`.
;'
0
~.
~ ~
~ ca
a~
L ~
Q^ ~
am
0~004~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 2
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 8.A.1.
Subiect•
Nomination and Appointment to the Personnel Appeals Board
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Reappointment of Ms. Debra M. Girvin for a second term to the Personnel
Appeals Board.
Summary of Information:
The purpose of the Personnel Appeals Board is to hear employee grievances
relating to disciplinary actions or discriminatory application of County
personnel regulations. The Personnel Appeals Board has the ability to modify
or reverse disciplinary decisions. The appointments are for a three-year
term and are not related to residing in a particular magisterial district.
Debra M. Girvin's first term ended December 31, 2009, and Ms. Girvin has
expressed an interest in a second term, which will expire December 31, 2012.
Eight other citizens have expressed interest in an appointment to the
Personnel Appeals Board within the Board's citizen application process.
Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees
are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless
the rules of procedure are suspended by unanimous vote of the board members
present. Nominees are voted on in the order that they are nominated.
Preparers Mary Martin Selby Title: Director of HR Services
Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No #
~~0041
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 8,x,1.,
Subiect•
Set Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendments to County Code to Permit
Wind Energy Systems (WES)to Be Located in Agricultural (A), Residential (R),
Office (O), Commercial (C) and Industrial (I) Districts with Certain
Restrictions
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Set a public hearing for March 10, 2010 to consider the proposed amendments
to County Code §§19-65; 19-124; 19-131; 19-181 and 19-301.
Summary of Information:
The Board held a public hearing on October 28, 2009 and remanded the proposed
ordinance to the Planning Commission to address concerns raised by the Board.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 19,2010 and
recommended approval of the Ordinance.
The proposed amendments to the zoning code permit the installation of wind
energy systems (WES) in Agricultural (A), Residential (R), Office (O),
Commercial (C) and Industrial (I) districts with certain restrictions. This
ordinance establishes development standards including minimum lot size,
height, setbacks and rated capacity for tower and roof mounted WES.
The Ordinance as approved by the Planning Commission is attached.
Preparers Kirkland A. Turner
Attachments: ^ Yes
Title: Director of Planning
2723:75869.1(75569.1)
^ No
000042
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 19-65,
19-124, 19-131, 19-181, AND 19-301 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE
RELATING TO REQUIREMENTS FOR WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Sections 19-65, 19-124 19-131, 19-181 and 19-301 of the Code of the County off'
Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read as follows:
Chapter 19
ZONING
000
ARTICLE III. DISTRICTS
000
DIVISION 4. R-88 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
000
Sec. 19-65. Uses permitted with certain restrictions.
The following uses shall be permitted in the R-88 District subject to compliance with the
following conditions and other applicable standards of this chapter. If these restrictions cannot
be met, these uses may be allowed by conditional use, subject to section 19-13:
000
~h,~ Wind Energ~ystems (WESTprovided that:
WES shall be located on a lot that is a minimum of 5 acres;
~2,~ WES shall be located in the rear yard;
WES shall have a rated capacity of no greater than 10 kilowatt hours (kWh
~, WES shall be limited to one per lot;
the tower height (including the blade assembly measured from the highest swee
point) shall not exceed ten (10) feet for each one complete acre of land in the
parcel where the WES is to be located, to a maximum of sevent -f~ ive (75 feet,
including the tower and blade assembly, at the highest point of the blade sweep;
~6,~ no portion of the blade sweep shall extend within twenty (20) feet of the round;
setbacks from any property line shall be a minimum of two (2) times the tower
height including the blades measured from the ground to the hi hest point of the
blade sweep area;
O~U043
1925:82770.1
WES noise level shall not exceed 60 decibels as measured from the closest
property line. The level may be exceeded during short-term events such as utility
outages and/or severe wind storms:
guy wired or lattice towers shall be prohibited;
1~0,) WES shall not be artificially lighted unless required by the FAA or appropriate
authori
the base of the WES tower shall incorporate measures to prevent non-authorized
personnel from ascending the tower for a distance of 12 feet from rg ade•
at such time as the WES ceases to be used for its intended purpose for a period
exceedin twelve 12) consecutive months, such WES shall be dismantled, and it
and all associated equipment removed from the property; and
1~3,) The applicant shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws
ordinances and regulations.
14 WES may be roof mounted provided that:
a. the WES will be mounted to a principal dwelling or accessory structure on
the property it is intended to serve,
b. the lowest point of the arc of the blade shall be ten feet above the hei hg t of
the structure being mounted to; and
c. the WES height does not exceed height restrictions set forth in section 19-
556 for principal and accessory structures.
000
DIVISION 15. A AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
000
Sec. 19-124 Uses permitted with certain restrictions.
The following uses shall be permitted in the A District subject to compliance with the
following conditions and other applicable standards of this chapter. If the following restrictions
cannot be met, these uses may be allowed by conditional use, subject to section 19-13:
000
(g) Wind Energy System (WES) as specified for R-88 District.
000
1925:82770.1 2 0 J00~4
DIVISION 16. 0-1 NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE DISTRICT
000
Sec. 19-131. Uses permitted with certain restrictions
The following uses shall be permitted in the O-1 District subject to compliance with the
following conditions and other applicable standards of this chapter. If the following restrictions
cannot be met, these uses may be allowed by conditional use, subject to section 19-13:
000
(1) Wind Energy Systems (WES), provided that:
a site plan shall be reauired in accordance with sections 19-263 to 19-272 as
applicable;
WES shall be located on a lot that is a minimum of 5 acres;
~3,~ the height of the tower and blades at the highest point shall not exceed ten
(10) feet for each one complete acre of land in the lot where the WES is to
be located to a maximum of sevent~75) feet, including the tower and
blade assembly at the highest point of the blade sweep
~, guy wired or lattice towers shall be prohibited;
setbacks from any property line shall be a minimum of two (2 times the
tower height including the blades measured from the ground to the hi est
point of the blade sweep area;
~6,~ WES shall not be lighted unless required by the Federal Aviation
Administration or app~riate authority;
~7,~ WES shall be limited to one per lot, and shall be sited on the lot it is
intended to serve;
~8,~ Standards for locating WES shall comply with the adopted tower siting
policy, as applicable;
~9,~ the base of the WES tower shall incorporate measures to prevent non-
authorized personnel from ascending the tower for a distance of 12 feet from
grade;
10 WES shall be limited to a maximum power generation of 100 kilowatt hours
(kWh
1~1,~ The applicant shall comply with all applicable federal state and local laws
ordinances and regulations; and
Q~O~~~
1925:82770.1 3
at such time as the WES ceases to be used for its intended purposes for a
period exceeding twelve (12) consecutive months, such WES shall be
dismantled and it and all associated equipment removed from the property
000
DIVISION 23. I-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
000
Sec 19-181. Uses permitted with certain restrictions.
The following uses shall be permitted in the I-1 District subject to compliance with the
following conditions and other applicable standards of this chapter. If the following restrictions
cannot be met, these uses may be allowed by conditional use, subject to section 19-13:
000
~k,~ Wind energy systems (WES as permitted in section 19-131.
000
ARTICLE VI. DEFINITIONS
Sec. 19-301 Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the
following meanings:
000
Wind EnerQV System (WES): A wind energy system, consisting of a wind turbine a
tower, and associated control or conversion electronics, which is used primarily to reduce on-site
consumption of utility power. Excess power generated by the WES and not presently needed for
on site consumption may be used by the utility (i.e. net metering).
000
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
O~D00'46
1925:82770.1 4
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 8._¢.2.
Subject:
Street Name Change
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Approve the renaming of Sabra Court to Sabra Way. Port Walthall Court was
changed to Sabra Court at the Board of Supervisors meeting on January 13,
2010. The right of way was dedicated on May 30, 2007 in Book 7814, page 126-
130. The Tax IDs for the affected parcels are 810635379400000,
809636639800000.
Summary of Information:
A request was made by Chesterfield County, Department of Economic Development
to rename Port Walthall Court to Sabra Court. This change was approved at
the January 13, 2010 Board of Supervisors meeting. Since that meeting, Sabra
Dipping Company now prefers the new name to be Sabra Way. There is one
company that has an address off Sabra Court and they have informed the
Department of Economic Development that they support the request for renaming
to Sabra Way. Sabra Way has been approved by Richmond Regional Planning
District Commission, Crater Planning District Commission and the GIS Section
of IST .
Staff Recommendations:
Recommend that the Board of Supervisors approve renaming Sabra Court to Sabra
Way.
District:
Bermuda
Preparers Richard M. McElfish Title: Director. Environmental Engineering
Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No #
0~00~:`7
Map of CL~terf eld UDUDty
M
17L50
~~~
~~~
s
1701
s
1011
V1-ay
>9.1.
/~.
P
• s s s
wrt
arrwy~yw~ rw^
~~r~.~a~. 8lyi~yMO~~lyds~~ OrWA~~~~r AM ~~Y~l~r Yi~~Y
~ ~~"~~ +rt~~r~r1~+7-~-ti rY ~-IWYOr~Y rY~/~~Y4 Yr~Y~br r1Y~4~
~w~~.~+~~~~~w~rw y~~~ri/ irl/rYrti~YWf~~OrY~~NIOr.
~+ir^~~tiarM~+~L~i+i~ ~W1/b ir~Y Y ^r/ r it ~~, IYR
V oo~~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 8, Q.3.a.
Subiect•
Resolution Recognizing Battalion Chief Kevin L. Spaulding, Fire and Emergency
Medical Services Department, Upon His Retirement
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of attached resolution
Summary of Information:
Battalion Chief Kevin L. Spaulding retired from the Department of Fire and
Emergency Medical Services on January 1, 2010, after providing over 33 years
of dedicated service to Chesterfield County.
Preparers Edward L. Senter. Jr. Title: Fire Chief
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No #
00004
RECOGNIZING BATTALION CHIEF KEVIN L. SPAULDING
UPON HIS RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Battalion Chief Kevin L. Spaulding retired from the Chesterfield Fire
and Emergency Medical Services Department, Chesterfield County, on January 1, 2010;
and
WHEREAS, Chief Spaulding began Recruit School #6 on July 1, 1976 and has
faithfully served the county for over 33 years in various assignments including as a
firefighter at the Bon Air Fire and EMS Station; and
WHEREAS, Chief Spaulding was promoted to the rank of sergeant on December 1,
1977 and served at the Bon Air and Ettrick Fire and EMS Stations; and
WHEREAS, Chief Spaulding was assigned to the Fire Prevention Bureau on July 2,
1979, and served as a Fire Inspector/Investigator, becoming certified by the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County as an expert witness in Fire Inspections and
Investigations; and
WHEREAS, Chief Spaulding was promoted to the rank of Lieutenant on September
16, 1987 and served at the Ettrick and Manchester Fire and EMS Stations; and
WHEREAS, Chief Spaulding was promoted to the rank of Captain on January 2, 1992
and served at the Manchester and Clover Hill Fire and EMS Stations; and
WHEREAS, Chief Spaulding was promoted to the rank of Senior Captain on March 1,
1996 and served as the Administrative Officer for "A" Shift; and
WHEREAS, Chief Spaulding was promoted to the rank of Battalion Chief on May 30,
1998 and served in that role for all four battalions and on two of the three shifts
during his tenure, using the knowledge and experience gained in these multiple
assignments to teach and mentor countless firefighters and company officers; and
WHEREAS, Chief Spaulding served as the Task Force Leader on VA Task Force 1 for
the deployment to Florida during the wildland fires of 1998; and
WHEREAS, Chief Spaulding assisted in the rescue of a 13-year-old boy trapped in
his bed when a large tree fell on the house in September of 2006; and
WHEREAS, Chief Spaulding was a member of the Minimum Staffing Workgroup, the
Volunteer Integration Committee, and the Tropical Storm Gaston Workgroup, where he
made tremendous contributions to the department's ability to manage large-scale
incidents; and
WHEREAS, Chief Spaulding is almost universally mentioned as one of the best
officers to work for due to his knowledge of the profession, for his concern for his
employees, and for always demonstrating the organization's goal to give the citizens
more than they expect; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors recognizes the contributions of Battalion Chief Kevin L. Spaulding,
expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the county, and
extends appreciation for his dedicated service and congratulations upon his
retirement.
~~®0~~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 2
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 8.~j,3.b.
Subject:
Resolution Reaffirming Chesterfield County~s Support of the John Tyler
Alcohol Safety Action Program and Policy Board
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Adopt the attached resolution reaffirming Chesterfield County's support of
the John Tyler ASAP program and policy board.
Summary of Information:
The Commonwealth of Virginia, in the interest of highway safety, has enacted
laws to create programs for probation, education, and rehabilitation of
persons convicted of driving motor vehicles under the influence of alcoholic
beverages and other self-administered drugs. These programs are known as
Alcohol Safety Action Programs or ASAP programs.
ASAP programs are generally conducted on a regional basis. The County
originally joined the "Capital Area" ASAP program by resolution adopted in
1979. The program is now known as the "John Tyler ASAP" program and includes
the cities of Colonial Heights, Emporia, Hopewell, Petersburg and the
counties of Chesterfield, Dinwiddie, Greensville, Henrico, Powhatan, Prince
George, Surry and Sussex. The program is governed by a Policy Board
consisting of one member appointed by each governing body. The Board hires
Preparers Colonel Thierrv G. Duguis
Title: Chief of Police
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No
00051
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2
AGENDA
an executive director who is responsible for day-to-day operations and serves
at the pleasure of the Board.
The existing 1979 resolution does not reflect the current membership,
organization or duties of the John Tyler ASAP and needs to be amended. The
proposed amended resolution is attached.
Staff recommends that the attached resolution be adopted by the Board.
(~~®~~iZ
RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING CHESTERFIELD COUNTY'S ENDORSEMENT OF AN INDEPENDENT
POLICY BOARD FOR THE JOHN TYLER ALCOHOL SAFETY ACTION PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Virginia, in the interest of highway
safety, has enacted laws to create programs for probation, education, and
rehabilitation of persons convicted of driving motor vehicles under the
influence of alcoholic beverages and other self-administered drugs, and these
programs are known as Alcohol Safety Action Programs or ASAPs; and
WHEREAS, since 1979, the local program "John Tyler Alcohol Safety Action
Program" has been serving the Cities of Colonial Heights, Emporia, Hopewell,
Petersburg and the Counties of Chesterfield, Dinwiddie, Greensville, Henrico,
Powhatan, Prince George, Surry and Sussex, providing probation, education,
and rehabilitation of person charged in violation of Virginia Code Section
18.2-266, and providing other services approved by the Commission on VASAP;
and
WHEREAS, Sections 18.2-271 and 18.2-271.2 of the Code of Virginia
require to establish a Commission on VASAP; said Commission to establish
procedures for the operation of local ASAP programs; and April 3, 1987, said
Commission issued directives that all local ASAP programs would establish and
implement an independent Policy Board, representative of localities served,
to operate the program; and
WHEREAS, by resolution previously adopted by this Board of Supervisors
on August 8, 1979, Chesterfield County became part of the John Tyler Alcohol
Safety Action Program pursuant to Section 15.2-1300 of the Virginia Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Chesterfield County hereby reaffirms
its position as a participating locality in the John Tyler Alcohol Safety
Action Program, herein called the Program, endorses the continuation of an
independent Policy Board, and agrees to the following:
1. The Policy Board consists of at least seven (7) but not more than
fifteen (15) members.
2. Each city and county governing body shall appoint one (1) member to
serve as a representative to the John Tyler ASAP Policy Board for a
term of three (3) years; and additional Policy Board members shall
be elected according to the Policy Board's by-laws. Membership not
appointed by the governing bodies of represented jurisdictions, at
the discretion of the Board, shall be selected or elected from but
not limited to the judiciary, the bar, law enforcement, education,
treatment professionals and other interested groups such as local
transportation safety commissions. Vacancies occurring on the
Board shall be filled by majority vote of the remaining Board
Members from nomination of other Board Members and participating
governing bodies of the jurisdiction.
(D~®OS3
3. A Chair, Vice Chair and Secretary shall be elected in accordance
with the by-laws. The Program's Executive Director shall serve an
ex-officio member without voting power.
4. The Policy Board shall hire and supervise the Program's Executive
Director. The Executive Director shall be responsible to implement
operational policies for the Program, hire and supervise staff for
the Program and control all revenues and expenditures. The
Executive Director shall serve at the pleasure of the Policy Board.
5. The program shall be operated by the Board in compliance with the
VASAP Commission Policies and Procedures and in conjunction with
requirement of the local administrative and fiscal agency;
6. Each fiscal year, the Executive Director shall prepare a budget and
submit it for approval to the John Tyler ASAP Policy Board and the
Commission on VASAP. The VASAP Commission shall be responsible for
funding any deficit occurring in the operation of John Tyler ASAP;
7. An annual report shall be prepared under the supervision of the
Policy Board indicating the activities of John Tyler ASAP;
8. This agreement shall remain in effect continuously from year to
year until termination either by the John Tyler ASAP Policy Board,
the local jurisdiction, or the Commission on VASAP. Participating
cities or counties may withdraw at any time by official action of
their governing body and appropriate notice to the John Tyler ASAP
Policy Board. If a locality withdraws, its representatives shall
no longer serve on the John Tyler ASAP Policy Board; and
9. The Program may acquire and own real property and personal property
as approved by the Policy Board for the Program's operation. Title
to such property shall be vested in the Program. Should the
Program cease to operate, all property shall be disposed of
pursuant to applicable provisions of the Virginia Code. The Policy
Board may seek the advice of the Commission on VASAP and the
Attorney General. It is the intent of this resolution that the
Program's assets, upon either partial or complete dissolution of
the Program, shall be divided amongst the participating localities
at the time of dissolution in the same proportion as the clients
served from that locality.
®~~~~4
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meetin Date: February 10, 2009 Item Number: 8.~.3.c.
SubLect:
Resolution Recognizing Mrs. Teresa J. Woods, Department of Real Estate
Assessments, Upon Her Retirement
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Mrs. Teresa J. Woods, Chief of Administrative Services for the Department of
Real Estate Assessments, will retire effective March 1, 2010 after 22 years
of dedicated service to the citizens of Chesterfield County.
Preparers Jonathan Davis Title: Director, Real Estate Assessments
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No #
O~OQ~S
RECOGNIZING MRS. TERESA J. WOODS UPON HER RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Mrs. Teresa J. Woods began her tenure of public
service with Chesterfield County as a Senior Administrative Officer
in the Department of Real Estate Assessments on October 29, 1987;
and
WHEREAS, in July 1996, Mrs. Woods was promoted to the position
of Principal Administrative Officer, and to the position of Office
Administrator II effective September 2001, to the position of
Administrative Manager, September 2002, and to Chief of
Administrative Services in November 2008; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Woods became a member of the Virginia
Association of Assessing Officers in 1987, serving on the Planning
Committee on Land Use, for Administrative Processes and Procedures
on Exemptions and on Adjustments to Assessment Records; and
WHEREAS, in 1995 and 1996, Mrs. Woods served on the process
action team for the purpose of updating and implementing the Annual
Appeal Review Process; and
WHEREAS, in 1995, Mrs. Woods served on the Planning Committee
for the Chesterfield Volunteer Program and Volunteer Appreciation
Open House; and
WHEREAS, in 1992, Mrs. Woods served as Business Consultant for
Junior Achievement; and
WHEREAS, in her role as Chief of Administrative Services, Mrs.
Woods effectively and efficiently coordinated the annual property
assessment programs for Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Woods will be missed by her staff and peers for
her expertise in the property assessment field; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Woods has been a dedicated and faithful employee
of the County of Chesterfield for over 22 years.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding contributions of
Mrs. Teresa J. Woods, and expresses appreciation on behalf of all
residents for her service to the county, congratulations upon her
retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Q~oO~s
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 8.B.3.d.
Subiect:
Resolution Recognizing Chief Deputy State Coordinator Janet Clements,
Virginia Department of Emergency Management, Upon Her Retirement
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Mr. Warren requests that the Board adopt the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Chief Deputy State Coordinator Janet Clements retired from the Virginia
Department of Emergency Management (VDEM), after providing 30 years of
dedicated service to the Commonwealth, including 25 years with VDEM. Ms.
Clements is a resident of the Clover Hill District.
Preparers Edward L. Senter, Jr. Title: Fire Chief
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No #
RECOGNIZING CHIEF DEPUTY STATE COORDINATOR JANET CLEMENTS
UPON HER RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Chief Deputy State Coordinator Janet Clements retired from the
Virginia Department of Emergency Management on February 1, 2010; and
WHEREAS, Chief Deputy Clements joined the Virginia Department of
Emergency Management (VDEM) in 1984 as a Public Information Officer; and
WHEREAS, Chief Deputy Clements was selected as VDEM's Public Affairs
Office Director in 1999; and
WHEREAS, Chief Deputy Clements was instrumental in designing and
developing the current nationally recognized Virginia Corps program; and
WHEREAS, Chief Deputy Clements was appointed by Governor Mark Warner as
VDEM's Chief Deputy State Coordinator in 2002; and
WHEREAS, Chief Deputy Clements, during her tenure with the agency,
responded to 28 presidential disaster declarations, including Hurricane
Isabel, the terrorist attack on the Pentagon in 2001 and many other
significant events; and
WHEREAS, Chief Deputy Clements oversaw the Operations, Public Affairs,
Training and Exercises, Local Support Services, Technological Hazards, and
Preparedness divisions of the agency; and
WHEREAS, Chief Deputy Clements served as Virginia's emergency management
representative on the National Capitol Region's Senior Policy Group for
Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness, and was a member of the
Commonwealth Preparedness Working Group; and
WHEREAS, Chief Deputy Clements, during her career, provided invaluable
guidance, support and encouragement to the county's emergency management
program; and
WHEREAS, as a result of her dedication to the citizens of the
commonwealth and Chesterfield County, our citizens are better prepared for
natural and man-made disasters.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors recognizes the contributions of Chief Deputy State Coordinator
Janet Clements, expresses the appreciation of all residents for her service
to the commonwealth and to the county, and extends appreciation for her
dedicated service and congratulations upon her retirement.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 3
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: $,~.4.
Subject:
Appropriation of Juvenile Accountability Block Grant Funds from the
Department of Criminal Justice Services
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Authorize Human Services Administration to receive $40,393 in Juvenile
Accountability Block Grant funds from the Department of Criminal Justice
Services and authorize an increase in appropriations by $40,393.
Summary of Information:
The Juvenile Accountability Block Grant is a federal block grant program
designed to promote greater accountability in the juvenile justice system.
In Virginia, the Department of Criminal Justice Services serves as the
State's administrator of the program, and localities can receive funding to
address one or more specific program purpose areas.
The Department of Criminal Justice services has allocated $40,393 in Juvenile
Accountability Block Grant funds to Chesterfield County and the City of
Colonial Heights. The county will provide $2,126 in local cash match for a
total award of $42,519.
Preparers Jana D. Carter Title: Director, Juvenile Services
Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No #
~a®o~~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3
AGENDA
Summary of Information: (Continued)
Since 2003, JABG funds have been used to support sex offender assessment and
treatment services, with the stated goal of enhancing public safety through
early identification, assessment and treatment services for juvenile sex
offenders. Referrals to the program are made by the Juvenile and Domestic
Relations Court.
This appropriation will support a CY2010 work plan for 25 participants and
1,000 hours of assessment, counseling and case management services.
~~~~~~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 3
AGENDA
Budget and Management Comments:
This item requests authorization from the Board of Supervisors for the
acceptance and appropriation of funds awarded by the Department of Criminal
Justice Services from its Juvenile Accountability Block Grant in the amount
of $40,393. The grant period is from January 1, 2010 through December 31,
2010, and must be renewed annually. The grant requires a $2,126 local match.
The local match has been identified from existing Virginia Juvenile Community
Crime Control Act (VJCCCA) funds. No additional county funds will be
necessary. No additional positions will be created.
Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management
Q~OOS9
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 8.F1.5.
Subject:
State Road Acceptance
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of resolution for referenced state road acceptance.
Summary of Information:
Dale: Kings Forest Section 12
Preparers Richard M McElfish
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No
#oao0s~
Title: Director. Environmental Engineering
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering
SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance -Kings Forest Section 12
DISTRICT: DALE
MEETING DATE: February 10, 2010
ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION:
OLD ZION HILL RD
Vicinity Map: Kings Forest Section 12
GOGg11.L R~
V
OMO FtO
a
r= ~ O' Zen ~d Yv
~ U ~~ ~ 2 ~~tip ~ cq,~
OMO RO G~Ft G~ ~~~ ~ST~O
`EOpO~O R
G~
-~N~ERR~ y
I ERRY
s
MgNVF~ CT ~ ~ O~
~~ ~z
DORIUS pR P~J = ~~ ~p
Opp ~ ~tv
~~
~O=
Produced By Chesterflsld County GIS
ooooss
- CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2
~~» AGENDA
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 8.13..6.
Subiect:
Designation of Open-Space Land for the John J. Radcliffe Appomattox River
Conservation Area and Authorize the Receipt and Appropriation of the Virginia
Land Conservation Foundation Grant in the Amount of $280,000
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
The Board of Supervisors is requested to designate county property as open-
space land and authorize the County Administrator to execute the Declaration.
The Board is further requested to authorize the receipt and appropriation of
the Virginia Conservation Foundation grant in the amount of $280,000.
Summary of Information:
In 2008 the county acquired 80 acres of land along the Appomattox River for
the John J. Radcliffe Appomattox River Conservation Area. Since that purchase
the Parks and Recreation Department has applied and received approval for a
Virginia Land Conservation Foundation grant in the amount of $280,000. A
condition of the grant is dedicating the property in perpetuity as open-space
land under the Open-Space Land Act. The Virginia Land Conservation
Foundation grant funds will be used to make site improvements to include
river access for hiking trails, parking and additional land acquisition.
Approval is recommended.
District: Matoaca
Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No
OU0052
1~~~
~,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
Budget and Management Comments:
This item requests that the Board of Supervisors designate county property as
open-space land and authorize the County Administrator to execute the
Declaration. The Board is further requested to authorize the receipt and
appropriation of the Virginia Conservation Foundation grant in the amount of
$280,000.
The Board approved the acquisition of this land in April 2008. The
acquisition of this land provided the county with over one mile of
undisturbed riverfront property adjacent to and accessible from the existing
county Appomattox River Canoe Launch facility.
The County Parks and Recreation department plans to use the grant funds to
make site improvements which include river access for hiking trails, parking,
and additional land acquisition. There are no local match requirements for
this grant.
Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management
OOOOF3
~; -. ,
0000E 4
~~
5 a~
•~r
~ • •
<{ r~
5
t, ~ Y `
s
v A
A~
Y
® ~
s
o i ,,•
~ °,,
~ t
~„
c
r i<
~~`
Q
--1
R
.,,,~ •--
:.~.
~w
~, r
d
r.crai~if
/~
.i iyn-~
~>wmb •. f ~ ..a
t
.
. t
~ .~..n°.
oi,
:
R wlvyY~in
F .//M M<
S ' '
!~ ~~
•itii i' ~ r 4~•
~
~ ~~ Ne
r r uriw
'
~ r.rfr.w to i
Q
2
~....
~
y.,,i ~
'^~
•s'riP s
y~ $"a'`n
m a
~ ~ ~ -~
s
~.. ~ s
® 4~R1~
"o+~i'
".".,~ ~
Q b
R.
S
~~ ~
awsn
~ . Y ~~
~ ~ ~ ~4
q ~ ~n
~q
E ~
R'^
hy~rl ~
L'. f
y '%
~~~`
~~. ~,~
r ~
~~~~
i
~a~
at~~
~=I
1s
f~~C
iSiY
`3~
i n,
i ci
~ I
Z
a
~
~
~/ l
U
Q ~~
~~1
i
lj~o~~S
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
_ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1
AGENDA
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: $,a.7.
Subject:
Authorization for AT&T to Apply for Conditional Use or Conditional Use
Planned Development for a Communications Tower and Antennae to Be Installed
on County Property at Bensley Park
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Authorize AT&T to apply for conditional use or conditional use planned
development for a communications tower and antennae to be installed on county
property at Bensley Park.
Summary of Information:
AT&T has requested authorization to apply for conditional use or conditional
use planned development to install a communications tower and antennae on
county property at Bensley Park. If the zoning is approved, leasing the
property will require approval by the Board at a Public Hearing.
Approval is recommended.
District: Bermuda
Preparers John W. Harmon
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No
Title: Real Property Manager
# o~oo~s
VICINITY SKETCH
Authorization far AT&T to apply far Conditional
Use ar Conditional Use Planned Development for
a Communications Tower and Antennae to be
Installed an County Progerty at Bensley Park
~~
5TH ST Sys
o,~
~'~o
~Q
N
D
r
m
W
0
~ ° ~ °
~
~
~
~ o
~ Q i70 U
O
N 3RD S
N ND S ~
D
r
m
W
O
0
~ o
o ~
~ $~TERBU RNE RD ~ ~
~ ~
R~'~ ~ ~ ai
`~ O +~
o ~
Q ~ ~ ~ ~Ar +~aR~ R~
1 ~'~
RU >~
S~1N~~~~p / ~
>~
/ ~ Zq
A Z
• -a'i ~
UR~WR~s
~'~ g~,t~F~ ~~
°~ ~~~~
~ R
~ ~ ELK D
v_
ROVE oR Bensl~r Pik
~~{ Lys
1. C ERRY HILL PARKAVE (,~, ~~~~
2. C EEKVIEW DR CPS
x
3. B NSLEY PARK BLVD ~ p ~ U:
~~
°~ "~ ~ o r
C~ .,
~~F ~~F ~
N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities ,
W ~ - 'E
S
1 6c1 -666.E Ret
O~oo`~~
~ g
~~~
~~
~ ~~~~~
N ~~ o~•-
L ~n ,c ;....0 3
~ o
Q o.N-°N~
~ ~
~' ~3a~~a'i~ Q~
vii o
K1 a ~
~D r7 a` U° °
0 ~ ~ ~ c
~~ ~ ~ ~ N
~~N ~ 1 ~ o
Q~N ~ ~> -
.. I~ N 'o
~~~•p
W L ~
Jw~ -~ v O C++ ~ C ~~,
c ~ o o ~ ~~
Z~~.~~ ~~
O °v 3 8 ~
07 a ~.~. ~- ~ m _
N ~ +,
I N
U N
g ~~ o
N ~ U
p p U
_ ov
B O C
'~ ~
a~
O ~o
OJOOF3
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1
AGENDA
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 8.4.8.
Subiect•
Authorization for Clearwire to Apply for Conditional Use or Conditional Use
Planned Development for Communications Antennae to Be Installed on the Dutch
Gap Water Tank
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Authorize Clearwire to apply for conditional use or conditional use planned
development for communications antennae to be installed on the Dutch Gap
Water Tank.
Summary of Information:
Clearwire has requested authorization to apply for conditional use or
conditional use planned development to install communications antennae on the
Dutch Gap Water Tank. If the zoning is approved, leasing the property will
require approval by the Board at a Public Hearing.
Approval is recommended.
District: Bermuda
Preparers John W. Harmon
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No
Title: Real Property Manager
oaoos~
VICINITY SKETCH
Authorization for Clear ire to apply for
Conditional Use or Conditional Use Planned
Development for Communications Antennae to
be Installed on the Dutch Gap Water ?ank
R'p G'C
4~0
~ V
o ~ao~ y°c
~~ ~' ~9~ -
r
r (~, Sl~t~ KU
Y
5gy}ftY RD 0 ~ o
rn ~
r 4
a`~ cT
Q~z ~~~ a
~ ~'~ ~ QRr
5 J~'~` ~P~v sr ~=~V 44 frj~~~~
4t~ST 4 UP4 ~p ~~
P~ vp ~~
~ ~ y
>~ o o~'
r~ Gok~~ v~2~ ~~~
~~ CT 76 OSBORNE RD
~ ~ ~ ~
~ o cT ~
Qw~" ~
2 ~ "t N
T~ ~
qrc R 3
d It ~~~~yCas PR
P~F,~yO ~~~ d Ply ~5
G~ W~S~ P~~~ ~ ~ w
WARFI ELp 0. .1rG~t
G~,9 EST,g7~ pC 1,G~~N 6~~
GC~~ },OpP
Dutch dap YYater Tank
OSBp~~ R~
N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities
w ;- E
s
1 Irol - 633.33 to t
~~~0~®
p ~H~~
to ~ ST
a 11501- `,
N ~'
11510
11527
m
2606 m 11537
11541
N~~S ~
N
11600
11640
2500
AR~~ A/
pg Ogpg RNE RD
0000'71
--
x~d 2343
2342 ~ 2331
~~ ~ w
2346 ~~ 2337
11501
O
1,soa i
11513
11519
11523
11527
2355 ,\y 2:
~~ ~
2354 ~ 2940
~ 2347 2346
2350
2356
241
2406
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 8. ~.s.
Subiect:
Conveyance of an Easement to Verizon Virginia Incorporated
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County
Administrator to execute an easement agreement with Verizon Virginia Inc. for
underground service to the cell tower site at Lake Chesdin Park.
Summary of Information:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Chairman of the
Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an easement
agreement with Verizon Virginia Inc. for underground service to the cell
tower site at Lake Chesdin Park. This request has been reviewed by county
staff and Comcast Cablevision.
Approval is recommended.
District: Matoaca
Preparers John W. Harmon
Title: Real Property Manager
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No
oaoo72
VICINITY SKETCH
Conveyance of an Easement to Verizon Virginia Inc.
V
ccxUV~avcE of
AN ~4SEM EN T
r ~
Q~'
9
N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities
w -E
S , ud - 556.sZ tet
0000'73
EXMIB? 'A'
TIVOLI LLC
GPINDB 7172963528 97580880
KINTON, EOMARO M
OB 358 P6 317
GPIN• 734832488800880
C i R REALTY LP
OB 5799 PG 436
CPIN• 738631582808000
~O~B X63 PGC418~1
CP1N• 7]3631192000000
CARUTMERS JERRY i JOAN
• OB 7935 PG 295
OPIN• 737630168500000
CONTRE~RAS~G ~AC~016 W1RIA
OPIN• 773698173700800
304
CEgiT~
'~IEq
~ Lg
~ ! m
/ -~
1
f ~
i ~`
COUNTY STERF[ELO
CPIN~• 34 301 9
ND~B 6Rj GL ~D
OP1N• 733629179508008
~' ne 4e5iN~aas28w4wo. N,wr
GPIN• 733029186908000
McGOYERN.OENNIS J i KAREN M
OB 3991 PG 298
OPW 733629034708800
JONNSTONE.DANIEL K i P K
OB 5426 PG 805
GPIN• 733629868488880
BANKS. STEPNEN N i OENA M
~
OB 4432 PO 403
GPIN• 777628437900000 / /
PARCEL, 734630188100000 14700 N.iVEY MILL RD CHESTERFIELD, VA 23838
Cf
VERl20N VIRGlN/A /NC
EASEMENT EXHfBlT 'A• GRANTOR / OYYNER, MAGfSTfRIAL DISTRACT, MATOACA
County of Chesterfield TAY NAP Ha N/A
-P/~ DENOTES P/SAND/OR ~, P/Nt 734630188100000 ~
ADORESSr P. 0. Box 40
------- UM?S OF EASEMENT Chesterfield, VA 2383 DEED Boor: 2695 PAGE, 825
------- EASEMENT CENTERLINE TELEPHONE, INSTRUMENT Ala N/A
Prepored Dy, L. R. HOWARD GRANTOR SAIT ~
C & R Real LP
PA»eNa (8041772-5237 ~ CEO 8548 J 4 ~ ~
CENTRAL OFFICE, CHESDIN GRANTOR RglTE 4A PLAT 10
v2 Row Afa CTE-09-267553-R Continental Land Sales
COVER SHEET Afa N'ORX ORDERS CD09008
~a1
CURYE RADIUS ARC LENOTN CNORD LENGTN BEARING DELTA ANGLE
CI 417.91' 710.&1' 627.99' N4S 78'S9'N 9 24'58'
C2 367.91' 661.34' 564.11' N45°28'S7•Ir 9 41'67'
C7 765.66• 77.77 77.63' S S3'28`M 1 '24•
U 41500 07.63' 83.66' 47 7'26'11: 1 '2P
00'4
i _ ~~i
,~..
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 3
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 8.!3.10.
Subiect:
Change Order to Raymond Key Commercial Contracting for Security Equipment and
Installation at the Circuit Courts Building Addition and Renovations Project
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action ReQueste
Authorize the County Administrator to execute a change order to the contract
with Raymond Key Commercial Contracting in the amount of $196,936.84 for
security equipment and installation at the Circuit Courts Building Addition
and Renovations Project.
Summary of Information:
When the Circuit Courts Building Addition and Renovations Project was bid in
2008, it was decided to bid the security system separately to be assured full
compatibility with the on-going security system upgrade that was already
underway in the existing building. Consequently, the county included an
allowance in the construction contract for future security requirements,
recognizing that the actual cost would depend on development of final
specifications. As construction progressed the security system plan was
finalized and separately bid in the fall of 2009. The contract was awarded to
the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Dominion Lock and Security
Incorporated, in the amount of $290,033.07. The security contract is now
being assigned as anticipated by the construction contract to Raymond Key
Commercial Contracting for administration, coordination and execution. This
change order of $196,936.84 represents incorporation of the as-bid cost of
the security contract plus the contractor's mark-up and additional bond costs
into the construction contract.
Preparers Robert C. Key Title: Director, Department of General Services
Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No
oaoo~s
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3
AGENDA
The security system installation for the Circuit Courts Building addition and
renovations project requires integration with the existing system,
coordination with the on-going operations of the courts, and coordination
with the multiple phases of the project. The system covers the newly
constructed offices, permanent records storage and archive space in the two-
story addition, and the renovated areas in the existing building. The work
consists of access control readers for selected doors, video monitors for
observation of critical access and egress points, network video recording,
all locking devices, door position switches, glass break sensors and all
associated cabling, software, and infrastructure. The work must be installed
in multiple phases to support the various construction phases, ensuring that
the security systems are functional prior to each move from existing space to
new or renovated space. Each phase involves close coordination with the
Circuit and District Court Clerks and the Sheriff's Office to prevent
disruptions to court proceedings, and to ensure that sensitive documents are
properly secured, moved, and placed in the new or renovated areas. All new
security installations are fully compatible with the systems and equipment
that has been installed over the past three years in the security upgrade of
the Circuit Courts Building.
~~~0~6
~~~
S h$, Z
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 3 of 3
Budget and Management Comments:
This item requests that the Board approve change order number 12 in the
amount of $196,936.84 for security equipment and enhancements in the
circuit court building additions and renovations project. Sufficient funds
are available in the project contingency.
Based on the administrative policy, subsequent change orders will require
Board of Supervisors approval as the aggregate change in the contract
amount will be in excess of policy established levels (pending approval of
this item).
Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management
000'7'7
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1
AGENDA
~»
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 8.8.11.
Subject:
Transfer $4,500 from the Bermuda District Improvement Fund to the Parks and
Recreation Department for the Department to Purchase Materials to Erect a
Press Box and Scoreboard at the Goyne Park Football Field
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Transfer $4,500 from the Bermuda District Improvement Fund to the Parks and
Recreation Department for the Department to purchase materials needed to
erect a press box and scoreboard at the Goyne Park football field.
Summary of Information:
Supervisor Jaeckle has requested the Board to transfer $4,500 from the
Bermuda District Improvement Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department for
the purchase of materials to erect a press box and scoreboard at the Goyne
Park football field. The Wells Athletic Association originally requested
funds from the County to purchase the materials. The County is not legally
authorized to give money to private organizations like the Association but
the County can give money to the Parks and Recreation Department for the
Department to purchase building materials and make capital improvements on
County property for a public purpose. The Department must purchase the
materials in accordance with the Virginia Public Procurement Act and County
purchasing polices.
For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund
accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report.
Preparers Allan M. Carmody
Attachments: ^ Yes
Title: Director, Budget & Management
0425:82460.1
No
#000078
~~ Ih'~ Page 1
A'
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
APPLICATION
This application must be completed and signed before the County can
consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and
signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County
can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on
the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement
Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude
the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request.
1. What is the name of the applicant
(person or organization) making this funding
request?
Association, Inc.
2 If an organization is the applicant, what is
the nature and purpose of the organization?
(Also attach organization's most recent
articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to
application.)
Wells Athlletic
WAA is a nonprofit,
nonpartisan, and nonsectarian corporation that exists to provide positive,
wholesome, family-oriented activities for children who live within the
school district of CC Wells Elementary in Chesterfield County, Virginia.
3. What is the amount of funding you are
seeking?
4. Describe in detail the funding request and
how the money, if approved, will be spent.
press box at the Goyne Park football field.
5. Is any County Department involved in the
project, event or program for which
you are seeking funds?
$4,500.00
Materials to construct a
Parks and Rec
6. If this request for funding will not fully fund
your activity or program, what other
individuals or organizations will provide ~~®0-79
the remainder of the funding?
Page 2
self funded
7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following:
Is the organization a corporation? Yes ® No ^
Is the organization non-profit? Yes ® No ^
Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes ^ No
8. What is the address of the applicant
making this funding request?
P.O. Box 3891 Chester, VA 23831
9. What is the telephone number; fax number,
e-mail address of the applicant?
phone :804-640-4631 email address: stevegarber1@comcast.net
Signature of applicant. If you are signing
on behalf of an organization you must be
the president, vice-president,
chairman/director orvice-chairman
of the organization.
Signature
President
Title (if signing on behalf of an organization)
Steve Garber
Printed Name
9-14-09 ~ ~ ~ 08~
Date
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 9.A.
Subiect:
Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects,
District Improvement Funds, and Lease Purchases
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Acceptance of attached report.
Summary of Information:
Preparers James J. L. Steamaier Title: County Administrator
Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No #
®~00~3~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
GENERAL FUND BALANCE
February 10, 2010
Board
Meeting
Date Description Amount
Balance
07/01/09 FY2010 Beginning Budgeted Balance $53,495,000
~~~O~a~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS
February 10, 2010
Boazd
Meeting
Date Description Amount Balance
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2008
4/9/2008 FY2009 Budgeted Addition $17,810,300 $22,647,488
4/9/2008 FY2009 Capital Projects (16,792,400) 5,855,088
6/24/2009 Tax Collection Customer Service project (244,400) 5,610,688
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2009
4/9/2009 FY2010 Budgeted Addition $13,946,400 $19,557,088
4/9/2009 FY2010 Capital Projects (13,946,400) 5,610,688
00003 s
0
O
[~
M
O
~ ~ 69 ~ 69 69 ~ 69
V
~ ~
~.. ~
R ~
~ ~
O 'S7 '
y ~ M
~ ~ ~ N
~ O
..r
~/j N
O
A
z
^C y
~
A
N
~ _
O~
N
Vii
~
Z O
.
~+ ^'
_' .-.~ N ~ ~
C
N 0
~ '
~
~
~
L
a
~ ~
E,y (iy p
N ~, O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
U
~
~ L
~I
A
~
~ > ~ l~ ~ N o~0
Q ~ N
O O O 00 ~
C G~
M
00 o0
M N
~ N
Q~
` lfj .--~
i ~
o.~ U
~
x ~ C
~ 3
,~. ~ y ee C ~+'
A
~
U
A R
~
~
U
O€~0~1f3~
Prepazed by
Accounting Department
January 31, 2010
Date
Began
04/99
O1/O1
03/03
03/04
10/04
12/04
12/04
OS/OS
05/06
08/07
SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES
APPROVED AND EXECUTED
Original
Description Amount
Public Facility Lease -Juvenile Courts Project $16,100,000
Certificates of Participation -
Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation;
Acquisition/Installation of Systems
Certificates of Participation -Building
Construction, Expansion and Renovation
Certificates of Participation -Building
Construction, Expansion and Renovation;
AcquisitionMstallation of Systems
Cloverleaf Mall Redevelopment Project
Energy Improvements at County Facilities
Energy Improvements at School Facilities
Certificates of Participation -Building
Acquisition, Construction, Installation,
Furnishing and Equipping;
Acquisition/Installation of Systems
Certificates of Participation -Building
Acquisition, Construction, Installation,
Furnishing and Equipping;
Acquisition/Installation of Systems
Certificates of Participation -Building
Expansion/Renovation, Equipment
Acquisition
TOTAL APPROVED
AND EXECUTED
PENDING EXECUTION
Description
None
13,725,000
6,100,000
21,970,000
16,596,199
1,519,567
427,633
14,495,000
11,960,000
22,220,000
125.113.399
Outstanding
Date Balance
Ends 01/31/2010
11/19 $8,050,000
11/21 6,735,000
11/23 4,180,000
11 /24 16,270,000
10/10 16,596,199
12/17 1,132,880
12/10 91,493
11 /24 10,375,000
11/24 8,745,000
11/27 19.880.000
Approved
Amount
~~~®~~
February 10, 2010
Speaker's List
Afternoon Session
1.
~) Shelley MurraX
~~ Jane Weisenfels
~~ Jo-De Davis
5 ~~~
Address to the Chesterfield County School Board
February 10, 2010
Frank Cardella, NBCT
President, Chesterfield Education Association
Chairman Gecker, Members of the Board, Mr. Stegmaier:
"Public education is the key civil rights issue of the 21st century. Our nation's knowledge-based economy
demands that we provide young people from all backgrounds and circumstances with the education and
skills necessary to become knowledge workers. If we don't, we run the risk of creating an even larger gap
between the middle class and the poor. This gap threatens our democracy, our society and the economic
future of America." ~ Eli Broad
All over America, school boards are being forced to make cuts that aze uncomfortable at best, untenable at
worst, yet many aze feeling the pulse of a 2009 Rasmussen Poll that shows 71 % of Americans feel that
teachers should not be asked to take pay cuts or furloughs as a means of dealing with the budget crises
that school systems are facing.l While we've heard in Chesterfield that there area "significant number of
households without children," the nationwide poll shows that only 20% of such people think that teacher
pay cuts are a reasonable option. 2 Everyone understands that budgets are tight across the nation, but not
all districts aze taking the same approach with cuts.
Other options under consideration include:
• In Mississippi, the state High School Activities Association cut sports teams' schedules by 10
percent. To reduce the number of bus trips taking teams to competing schools, players will turn
out for three fewer games a season.3
• In Traverse City, Michigan, class sizes will grow, and the athletic program will be cut so sharply
that freshman sports teams could be eliminated, meaning ninth-graders would play on junior
vazsity teams.
• About 60 school districts and individual schools in Illinois formed a consortium to negotiate group
rates on electricity and natural gas.
• The Nashville, Tennessee, school boazd is considering selling ads on its school buses. They would
be black and white, and alcohol, cigarette and political ads would be prohibited.
I shared these out-of--the-box ideas with the School Boazd last night, as well as measures being adopted
closer to home. There is some sense that our School Boazd is crying wolf; let me assure you that it is not
a case of our local school system pretending that the sky is falling. School districts across Virginia aze
facing critical funding shortfalls.
• Milton Liverman, superintendent of Suffolk Public Schools and president of the Virginia
Association of School Superintendents, said "school finances are the worst he's seen in 37 yeazs."4
• Norfolk Superintendent Stephen C. Jones called his division's budget situation "grave" in a memo
to employees and parents, stating "We will be forced to consider such unpalatable options as
<http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/general_lifestyle/august_2009/71_oppose
teacher_pay_cuts_and furloughs_to_help_budgets>
2 Ibid.
s <http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26012346/>
° <http://hamptonroads.com/2010/01/staff-and-program-cuts-larger-classes-forecast-va-schools?page=l>
Address to the Chesterfield County School Board
February 10, 2010
larger classes, fewer alternative, specialty and extracurricular programs, and reductions in
technical and instructional support provided to our schools.i5
Dr. Jerry Hill, Superintendent of Spotsylvania County Public Schools, indicated in a video
interview with NBC Washington that "when looking at the significant deficit of $14.7M, we're
forced to seriously consider all programs that are outside of the academic realm."6 For
comparative purposes, their salary scale starts $1,000 lower than ours, but ends over $20,000
higher, in fact, their scale at year 19 passes the top of ours (year 31).
Yet here's the rub; Chesterfield has a higher per capita income than all of these other communities save
Spotsylvania, who is only marginally better off, certainly not enough to account for the greater disparity
in education spending. We are the 19th wealthiest community in the state, yet 107th in per pupil
expenditures. We have the 1 lth lowest percentage of families in poverty, but 15th lowest for school-aged
children, meaning more of our young people are in need of financial assistance than any other group. We
keep hearing about Chesterfield being an aging community, yet the census says otherwise: our median
age is 35.9 years old, lower than state and national values, more than a quarter of our population is under
18 while only 10.5% is over 62, that's more than a 2-to-1 ratio, and again, a higher percentage of youth
and lower percentage of senior citizens than the state and nation. And there's a tax relief provision
available for those seniors on fixed incomes who meet the income and property guidelines; limits which, I
might add, exceed what the highest paid teachers earn in this county, yet we have to-and are willing to-
pay the taxes. 78.6% of citizens are homeowners, giving us a lower rental rate than our neighbors, and
among that group the median home value is $231,000. 30.8% of our households earn more than $100,000
per year, and more than 2/3 earn more than $50,000. ~ Even a 20 cent rate increase, targeted specifically
to public schools and public safety, only would cost the average citizen the equivalent of one tank of gas
per month, less than one trip to the movies for a family of four, and it would preserve teachers and
programs in our schools, and allow our police officers and firefighters to earn salaries closer to the market
value. You can't keep saying that Chesterfield citizens can't afford to pay the difference to maintain the
quality of our community; we can, and it is your job to make sure that we do.
We know that our school division can't levy its own school taxes like in so many other states. That's
unfortunate. But you can and must provide an allocation that is Quality Neutral, not Revenue Neutral.
The Superintendent has asked fora 4 cent increase to the real estate tax rate; this Board should go beyond
that and show that it values educational outcomes more than election outcomes. Prince William County
raised taxes 24 cents last year, while Chesterfield did nothing. Richmond City already pays 25 cents more
than we do, and yet the median income of Chesterfield households is just shy of double those in
Richmond. Suze Orman, the most successful fundraiser in the history of public television, has it right:
"Owning a home is a keystone of wealth... both financial affluence and emotional security." We have a
78.6% homeownership rate. Chesterfield is financially affluent, and it needs to provide its children and
their educators some security. Please advertise a higher real estate tax rate, one that is commensurate with
the financial wealth of this community, one that provides the flexibility to adapt to the almost daily-
changing funding estimates from the General Assembly, one that is Quality Neutral, not Revenue Neutral.
You didn't create this revenue shortfall, but you are the last line of defense against it; if you do not act in
the best interest of the public good-public safety and public education-children and their teachers will
be the ones who pay the price because we all know that Cuts Hurt Kids.
s Ibid.
s <http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local-beat/Virginia_School_Sports_On_the_Line_Washington_DC.html>
<http://factfinder.census.gov>
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1
AGENDA
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 14.A.
Subiect:
Resolution Recognizing Mr. Clarence Lee for His Outstanding Business
Accomplishments
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of the attached resolution recognizing Mr. Clarence Lee for his
outstanding business accomplishments in Chesterfield County.
Summary of Information:
Mr. Warren requested that the Board adopt the attached resolution recognizing
Mr. Clarence Lee of Midlothian Electric Company for his lifelong achievements
and contributions to Chesterfield County.
Preparers E. Wilson Davis, Jr. Title: Director, Economic Development
Attachments: ^ yes ~ No
OJ0086
RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING
CLARENCE LEE FOR HIS OUTSTANDING BUSINESS ACCOMPLISHMENTS
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes existing
businesses within the county that contribute to the county's economy and its
citizens; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County is proud to have Midlothian Electric Company
as a valued member of its business community for the past 45 years; and
WHEREAS, Midlothian Electric Company owner Clarence Lee was the first
black licensed electrician in the metropolitan Richmond area; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Lee started his business with one employee, and over the
years grew to twelve employees; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Lee's first major contract was wiring the bathhouses at
Pocahontas State Park; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Lee was the lead electrician for the Richmond skyscraper,
the James Center; for the renovations of the First National Bank building;
and Colson Hall on the campus of Virginia State University; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Lee was an integral part of the community, providing
electrical service to residents who could not afford it; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Lee campaigned to raise goods and restore electrical service
for victims of Hurricane Isabel.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors, this 10th day of February 2010, publicly recognizes Mr. Clarence
Lee, thanks him for his outstanding contributions to Chesterfield County, and
wishes him many more years of good health and prosperity.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented
to Clarence Lee of Midlothian Electric Company and that this resolution be
permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County, Virginia.
aaoo~~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 14.6.
Subiect•
Resolution Recognizing February 2010, as "Children's Dental Health Month"
in Chesterfield County
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Ms. Jaeckle requested that the Board of Supervisors recognize February
2010, as "Children's Dental Health Month." Dr. Samuel W. Galston, Dr. C.
Sharone Ward, Dr. Frank Farrington, Dr. Melanie Wexel Spears and JoAnne
Wells, R.D.H. will be present to receive the resolution.
Preparers Janice Blakley
Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No
#aooss
Title: Clerk to the Board
RECOGNIZING FEBRUARY 2010, AS "CHILDREN'S DENTAL HEALTH MONTH"
IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
WHEREAS, the Seventh Annual "Give Kids a Smile! Access to Dental
Care Day" was conducted in a number of Chesterfield County dental
offices and schools on February 5, 2010; and
WHEREAS, numerous children's dental health outreach activities and
education will take place in Chesterfield County Schools throughout
February 2010; and
WHEREAS, through the joint efforts of the Southside Dental
Society; the Virginia Dental Association; the Virginia Department of
Health, Division of Dentistry; the Medical College of Virginia School
of Dentistry; the Alliance of the Southside Dental Society; local
dentists and dental healthcare providers who volunteer their time; and
the school district of Chesterfield County, this program was
established to foster the improvement of children's dental health; and
WHEREAS, these dental volunteers have provided educational
materials and programs and stress the importance of regular dental
examinations; daily brushing and flossing; proper nutrition; sealants
and the use of mouth guards during athletic activities; and
WHEREAS, several local dental offices volunteered their services
on "Give Kids a Smile! Access to Dental Care Day," to provide treatment
and education to local underprivileged children.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board
of Supervisors, this 10th day of February 2010, publicly recognizes
February 5, 2010 as "Give Kids a Smile! Access to Dental Care Day" and
February 2010, as "National Children's Dental Health Month" in
Chesterfield County, and expresses gratitude, on behalf of all
Chesterfield County residents, and commends those organizations
responsible for their proactive approach to dental health and also
commends Dr. Samuel W. Galstan, Dr. C. Sharone Ward, Dr. Frank
Farrington, Dr. Melanie Wexel Spears and JoAnne Wells, R.D.H., for
helping to protect our children's dental health.
~~0®~~
February 10, 2010
Speaker's List
Evening Session #1
(Following Presentation of Resolutions)
1. lea p
~. Bob Herndon
~~ Heather Hart
~. Will Shewmake (Leslie Haley)
~~ (~ha 1~1 ~' 1 ~
Evening Session #2
(End of the Evening Agenda)
1:
~~ Stella Edwards
'~.~ Deb Dudley
~~ Ann Herndon
~~ ~ ~ ~ Gray 5e ~
Chairman and Members of the Board,
My name is Heather Hart. 1 am here to speak to you tonight as a member of CURG
(pronounced "Surge)-Citizens United for Responsible Government.
We continue to be concerned about the School Board's CIP and operating budget.
Within the CIP are questionable expenditures. These include $12M for Midlothian HS
and ~9M for old Clover Hill HS renovations in 1=Y2011. Bonds must be sold to fund
these projects. Should the School Board be using operating funds to repay these
bonds when these specific renovations are not needed
The School Board pushed through a plan to close Chester MS while not adding
money to the CIP for renovations to accommodate for high school students and
added funds to the operating budget to add 5-7 buses and bus drivers to maintain the
8"' grade at Chester MS. Can we afford to add 5-7 buses and drivers to the already
strained operating budgets When asked for Information from the School Board about
a cost analysis for this change we were not answered until we used the Freedom of
Information Act to request the Information. Here 1s the response we received- ~An
overview of Option 1...does not include dollar amounts but does acknowledge the
need for five to seven additional buses and drivers." How is this fiscally responsible?
CURL also believes that substantial accord needs to be obtained for this change to
take place and our understanding is that there was no substantial accord for the
Chester MS building because it was built in 1940. We ask for the board to follow up
with the Planning Commission to make sure that substantial accord Is met.
CURL is asking the Board to vote against the School Board's CIP entirely. There is
more work to be done before It is approved. We continue to ask you to oversee and
manage all of the tax payer's money. CURG also asks that there is collaboration with
the School Board on budgeting issues and major decisions concerning students and
staff. We are tired of receiving information from the School Board like- the BOS
requires middle school seats to be filled before there will be funding for new schools,
and then hear from BOS members that this was never said. There is a trust issue in
this county. Hearing Mr. Rajah's, Matoaca School Board member, rant last night at
the School Board meeting and him calling the BOS Ilars and anti-youth was hurtful to
this trust Issue.
Needs and not wants need to be considered, Just as the citizens have had to budget
for over the last couple of years. We look forward to continuing to work with the
Board of Supervisors and School Board to plan within these fiscally challenging
times.
Heather Hart
10901 Old Cheshire Lane
Chester, Va. 23831
804768-8682
~ ~~`~~
~~~ i~
(~~ effective basis and met current program standards. Second, avoiding the need for construction of new
schools was possible by allocating resources for additions at existing schools in areas where
overcrowding still existed, and using certain existing facilities in new ways. A copy of the proposed
Capital Improvement Program along with a summary of the Program and supporting information was
provided to the School Board.
Mr. Meyers stated it was recommended that the School Board receive this item for review and
invite public comment by email and written communication. Information would be posted on the School
system's web site for review =_`:,=~:=~_,~ _% c= ;~>;~_;.:~c:. It was anticipated that the School Board would
approve the Capital Improvement Program for FY2011-FY2015 at its January 12, 2010, regular School
Board meeting.
In response to a question from Mr. Wyman, Mr. Meyers stated the cost to build a new high school
was approximately $85 million.
Mr. Trammell stated several years ago, the BOS did not want and voted down a School Board
proposal for a comprehensive high school at the Clover Hild High School facility. The Planning
Commission did not approve substantial accord and subsequent action by the BOS took this completely
out of the hands of the School Board. What this did was place restrictions on how this facility could be
used and they still stand.
Mr. Trammell stated the Board was still concerned about what happens to the carry-over monies
for the previous three years-somewhere in the neighborhood of $1 SM or more-monies the school
system saved on operations that normally was appropriated back to the school system. For the past three
years, the BOS had kept those funds for use on their own operations. Regardless of several repeated
requests for those funds, to date, the most received back was a commitment to return one year of that
money
~~~~in reference to Chester Middle, the School Board had depended on many
good people to make projections on enrollment. As the economy had shown, a dot of good people still did
not know where we would be today. In response to a question that was asked, "Why did we build middle
schools when we had overcrowded high schools?" In 1995, the School Board went to the Chester
community-a very extensive discussion of over six months-in which we worked with the community in
many public meetings and public hearings in which two proposals were presented to the community at the
time. One was to build a new Meadowbrook High and one was to build a new Thomas Dale High. The
discussions took another turn because the community's expectations at that time was that the only land
available to build a high school would have been somewhere much further east in the county. Through
these meetings the community came together and the decision was that they did not want a new Thomas
Dale High School because it would rip the heart out of the Chester community. The School Board was
asked to undergo a major renewal for Thomas Dale. That takes time and planning to do that-to not only
plan but bid and then build. So the situation was at that time when the Board did that, we told the
community "understand that when we do this that there are a lot of trade-offs that would be made. One
was very clearly that Thomas Dale was landlocked though some land was purchased around Thomas
Dale in an effort to protect that school as much as they could. Site work started and the fields were
redone, the new gymnasiums, and new auditoriums, and new classrooms were built for over $44M to
bring the school to a capacity of over 1,800 students. When the renewal was completed the school was
under capacity. However, at the same time this was going on, all the middle school were overcrowded
and the Board did not have answers for that. Because based on their experience of how growth in the
County was taking off and where it was going; moving in cycles and based on the information the school
system had, a wait of one year's time was not enough time to build a school. It would take two years of
planning, another year of preparing documents for bid, and another two years to actually build the
18
school for a minimum of 5 years out... no one at that time had a clue what we were facing. At the same
time, the Board also knew the BOS had approved several large developments in the Bermuda district; one
being Branders Station with 5,000 homes and looking at the impact of that on existing facilities was
enormous. As far as the planning process, the School Board used the County sta, f~; School Board staff,
State and Federal staff, and worked with Fort Lee to obtain projections as we went through planning.
The one thing not made clear is the particular proposal that came to the School Board for Chester Middle
was not a decision that was made behind closed doors or done on the spur of the minute. The reason it
seemed like it was done so quickly-there were several things that came together that told us as a Board
that we could not afford to wait any longer to do something for the overcrowding at Thomas Dale High
School.
The public may not understand. The School Board does not sell debt service; the Board has no authority
to do that.
ne thing that came to the Board's attention recently was that the debt carrying
capacity was lowered by over $40M stopping any chance of building a new high school. Before the
economic storm, the Board was actually looking for ways to accelerate the building process, not delay it;
looking for ways to get it done sooner because the critical needs were there. Put all this together, the
concern of the School Board at this point, changes like this cause more change. The School Board was
very concerned that their ability to carry out any of those changes from a financial perspective was going
to adversely affect the budget. The staff looked at the mandates, where they were coming from, and what
they could do under those circumstances. Nothing was kept secret. Now here was the plan-the plan was
once the Board had seen the information put together they felt very strongly at that point they needed to
work with the staff of the schools first, that they needed to understand where the Board was looking; what
the potentials were. Second, the Board would go to the parents and students. Unfortunately, the best laid
plans go asunder very quickly. Because as soon as the principals were discussed, the initiative was taken
from the School Board and so letters were sent home to make sure parents were not out of the loop. 1
have never done that with my constituents. 1 announced a meeting at Thomas Dale High School on
December 16, 7: OOPMfor the purpose of hearing ideas from the affected community.
This is NOT a done deal; this is a proposal that was brought to us, but as we worked with the faculty
soliciting their suggestions, several made sense. Staff took those suggestions and began crunching
numbers to see what will work. In talking with Mrs. Jaeckle (BOS representative for the Bermuda
District), everyone has the same concern -the impact on everyone. We understand that. I think we are
looking for solutions that would help us move forward in a way that will use existing facilities better. The
projections received by the Board, again the best information we have available, will give CCPS the
capability to do something through 2018. Are there other options? Yes. Staff looked at other options.
The Board wild take action some time in January; and in the meantime, we will hear from the public at the
meeting orally and in writing and the Board will look at every one as they debate how they can best move
forward with the community in mind. That's what we are going to try to do. So, again -it's not a done
deal.
Mr. Wyman stated he did not want it to be lost in this discussion, the Board does have priorities
for taking care of renovations of existing facilities, making sure we're in the renovation mode on those
schools in alder districts of the county. But the Board does have other pressure points in other parts of
the county. We have overcrowding at Meadowbrook High School, as well as Cosby High School. We're
probably not jinished looking at solutions to solve those problems people cannot be moved from one
part of the county to another, other issues must be resolved in that process. Flexibility will be need. It's
just not as easy as it appears.
19
f ADDRESS TO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
February 10, 2010
Donald Wilms
Citizen, Matoaca Magisterial District
Chesterfield County, Virginia
Mr. Gecker, Members of the Board, Mr. Stegmaier:
Mrs. Durfee has said that "the [budget] cuts are coming
from the state, but the public is coming after us."1 Not
all of the cuts are coming from the state. You control how
much of the county's budget goes to the public schools.
You decide if they get 58% or 61$ or 660 or 71°s. If
the school system adopts efficiencies and saves money, you
get the money they saved. You are not responsible for
state cuts: you are responsible for your cuts.
Chesterfield is the 19th wealthiest locality in the gth
wealthiest state, with a median household income of
$71,327.2 Our median home value is $231,000.3 The median
age of our citizens is 35.9 years.4 We are not an aging
community of senior citizens on fixed incomes: only 10.50
of our population is age 62 and older.s But 25.40 of our
population in 18 years and under.6 Our younger citizens
outnumber our older ones by almost 2 ~ to 1.
At the public forum I attended at Salem MS, Mr. Carmody,
when asked, told the body that a tax rate hike of $.20
would allow us to keep everything the same. In my random
group there were some who said they could afford a $.20 tax
hike, but there was absolute consensus that we all could
afford a $.10 tax hike.
30.80 of Chesterfield households earn over $100,000
annually. This means that "we don't just have nice houses
in Chesterfield; we can actually afford the taxes on them."'
I earn less than the county median of $71,000, and I can
afford the taxes on my house.
If you raised the tax rate by $.20, 50~ of our citizens
would pay less than $462 in additional annual taxes or
about $38.50 a month, roughly the cost of a tank of gas,
' pearso^, Greg. "County To Review Schoo! Budget Details." Cheseerfield Observer 31=eb. 2010:
2.
z http://www.census.gov/did/www/saipe%unty.html.
a http:/lfactfinder.census.gov.
a http://factfinder.census.gov.
5 http:I/factfinder.census.gov.
` ``r~ttp.ilfaoefincier.census.gov.
~ hltr•/lmvcitc vnri~nn not/c~rah~n~clmn/rl~ta_wo~lth hfiml
. ,.y...,, .. j .,,...._ ........~..........,....., .....~.,......... ,...... ...r... ~ . _.... , ...
r ' ~ ADDRESS TO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
February 10, 201 U
and less than the cost of a trip to the movies for a family
of four. '
There are many good reasons to pay taxes: think about this
"the next time you dodge a pothole, visit the library or
see a yellow bus dropping off kids after school," and you'll
realize "we get a lot of value in return for our tax
dollars."~ When government pays the salary of a teacher, a
police officer, or a firefighter, we don't just "get the
benefit of that emplo_yee's service"~: "that salary is also
recycled back into the community. Teachers buy groceries
and clothing. Firefighters get their cars serviced and
takes thai r fami 1 i a~ nit to rli pnPr, Tht~ mnnay they Cnpnrl
c~aVS the OWnar's and ejTl_plOVePC ()f trle lnr-al businesses thev
r~atrnni ~c ~r8 -
r._.__~___~_,
~~f ~~~c rmpr.~ nn~ ,-li .,^r ;ln~~.~~ ~ m~;l _ _ 7~nnr~r-i f- ,~ ,-i ~har• r„A~•-
L-V1LLLttl.'tlllty. i8 "1r1VCJt 111lJi 111 sl.. hVVlJ~ la.L ."7CJ Q11 1..1t1GC11J
up . "?
Lhesterrieid needs leaders with courage.
n Fleisher, Paul. "Why Not Raise Taxes on Those Who Can Afford It?° Richmond Times-Dispatch
t=en. 2u-iu: is-i.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1
"" AGENDA
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 16.A.
Subject:
Public Hearing to Consider Changing the Zoning Category and Fee for the
"Keeping of Dogs for Private Use"
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
After public hearing, adopt the ordinance amendment set forth as Exhibit B.
Summary of Information:
Currently, the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") must approve a "special
exception" for a "private kennel" to allow the private use of three or more
dogs, more than four months old, on residential property. The ordinance
amendments attached as "Exhibit A" were recommended by the Planning
Commission and would convert the current BZA process into a conditional use
process with a public hearing before the Commission and the Board of
Supervisors. Exhibit A would also create two new conditional use categories:
(i) keeping three dogs for which the application fee would be $250 and (ii)
keeping of four to nine dogs for which the application fee would be $1,000.
At its January 13, 2010 meeting, members of the Board of Supervisors
expressed a desire to retain the current BZA special exception process, but
to amend the zoning ordinance so that three dogs are allowed by right in
residential areas without need of a special exception. If the Board wishes
to allow three dogs by right in residential areas and to retain the BZA
special exception process for four or more dogs, then the Board should adopt
the ordinance amendment attached as "Exhibit B".
Staff recommends adoption of Exhibit B.
Preparers Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Planning
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No #
0~0~-~~
Exhibit A
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 19-25, 19-67, 19-68, 19-123, 19-200.6 AND
19-301 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE KEEPING
OF DOGS FOR PRIVATE USE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Sections 19-25, 19-67, 19-68, 19-123, 19-200.6 and 19-301 of the Code of the
County o Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read as follows:
Sec. 19-25. Fees.
In addition to any other fees required by the county, fees shall be payable to the county
treasurer and submitted to the planning department upon filing the following applications:
TABLE INSET:
Application Type Fee, Based On
Residential Uses Office, Commercial, and
Industrial Uses
000
4. Certain conditional uses - -
000
e. Conditional use for the keeping of three 250.00 not applicable
dogs, not including service dogs, more than
four months old for rivate use.
f. Conditional use for the keeping of four to 1,000.00 not applicable
nine dogs, not including service do s, more
than four months old for rivate use.
5. Conditional use, all others 2,200.00 1,130.00
a. Plus er acre after first acre 90.00 80.00
000
000
Sec. 19-67. Conditional uses.
The following uses may be allowed by conditional use in the R-88 District, subject to the
provisions of section 19-13:
000
~ The keeping of three dogs, not including service dogs, more than four months old,
for private use.
~~o~~~
1925:82673.1
~ The keeping of four to nine dogs not including service dogs more than four
months old, for private use.
~} ~ Subject to the following requirements other uses that aze not specifically
enumerated in this chapter and that aze of the same general character as the
specifically enumerated uses allowed in this district. Before the planning
commission and board of supervisors heaz an application pursuant to this
subsection, the director of planning shall consider, among other things, the
following: the size and proposed configuration of the site; the size, height and
exterior azchitectural appeazances of any proposed structure or structures; noise;
light; glaze; odors; dust; outdoor activities; traffic; parking; signage; and hours of
operation. Based on these considerations, he shall determine that the proposed
use's operating chazacteristics and impacts of the specifically enumerated uses
allowed in this district.
Sec. 19-68. Special exceptions.
The following uses may be allowed by special exception, subject to the provisions of
section 19-21:
(1) Provided the owner or operator of the business resides on the premises, one-chair
beauty shops on a lot or pazcel inside of a dwelling unit or accessory building.
,"
Sec. 19-123. Permitted uses by right.
000
The following uses shall be permitted by right in the A District:
(a) Same as specified for R-88 District.
(b) Farming, not including stock or dairy farming, but including all buildings and structures
necessary to such use and the keeping, storage or operation of any vehicle or machinery
necessary to such use.
(c) Forestry operations and sawmills together with the incidental uses thereof.
(d) Graveyazds.
(e) Y°~~°', ~-~•~°*° The keeping of three or more dogs more than four months old for
private use.
000092
1925:82673.1 2
(f) Permanent manufactured home: Any manufactured home which is permitted by right in
the zoning district in which it is located and for which a manufactured home permit or
special exception is not required.
000
Sec.19-200.6. Special exceptions.
The following uses may be allowed in the TND district by special exception, subject to
the provisions of section 19-21.
~~
{~-~) Yard sales in excess of two (2) days.
000
Sec. 19-301. Definitions.
000
i~e~12t2e~l~t~ , ,
~@
000
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
1925:82673.1
Exhibit B
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 19-301 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE
RELATING TO THE KEEPING OF DOGS FOR PRIVATE USE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section 19-301 of the Code of the Count~of Chesterfield. 1997, as amended, is
amended and re-enacted to read as follows:
Sec. 19-301. Definitions.
000
Kennel, private: A place where twee four or more dogs, more than four months old, are
kept for private use.
000
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
0~®~9~
1925:83092.1 1
ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT
Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue)
Chesterfield County LN:KeepingDogs 1-27, 2-3 1/SP - 2.05 in.
Board of Supervisors
$430.70
The Observer, Inc.
Publisher of
Take notice that the Boazd of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County, Virginia, at an
adjourned meeting on February 10, 2010,
at 6:30 p.m. in the County Public Meeting
Room at the Chesterfield Administration
Building, Rt. 10 and Lori Road,
Chesterfield, Virginia will hold a public
hearing where persons may appear and
present their views concerning:
An Ordinance to amend the Code of the
County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended,
by amending and re-enacting Sections 19-
25, 19-67, 19-68, 19-123, 19-200.6, and 19-
301 of the zoning ordinance relating to the
keeping of dogs for private use, including
planning fees for conditional uses for the
keeping of such dogs. The legal authority
for enactment of these fees, levies, increases
and/or reductions includes the County
Charter and Va. Code 4 15.2-2286(A)(6).
Except as described below, no other new,
increased or reduced fees aze proposed
with this amendment.
Currently, the Board of Zoning Appeals
("BZA') must approve a "special exception"
fora "private kennel" to allow the keeping
of three or more dogs, more than four
months old, for private use on residentially
zoned property (which includes land zoned
Traditional Neighborhood Development,
i.e., "TND"). The current application
fee for a private kennel is $1,000. The
proposed amendments would eliminate
the special exception process for a private
kennel and substitute a "conditional use"
process that requires public heazings before
the Planning Commission and Board of
Supervisors instead of the BZA. In addition
to any other fees required by the County
under other ordinances, the amendments
would also create two new categories of
CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER
This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by
Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on
the following date(s): 1/27/2010 & 2/03/2010
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
~~
,~ , 2010.
~~
Legal Affiant
1
day of
es T, Grooms Jr., N ary Public
My commission expires: February 29, 2012
Commission LD. 7182093
THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU.
PO. Box 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 231 I? • Phone: (8041545-7500 • Fax: (804) 744-3269 • Email: news(e~chesterfieldobserveccom • Internet: www.chesterfieldobserveccom
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
_ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1
AGENDA
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 16.6.
Subiect•
PUBLIC HEARING: To Consider the Conveyance of County Property for the
Widening of Route 10 (I-95 to Ware Bottom Springs Road)
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Approve the conveyance of county property to the Commonwealth of Virginia for
the widening of Route 10 (I-95 to Ware Bottom Springs Road) and authorize the
Chairman of the Board and County Administrator to sign the deed.
Summary of Information:
On December 15, 2004 the Board authorized the acquisition of right of way for
the widening of the Route 10 (I-95 to Ware Bottom Springs Road). The Virginia
Department of Transportation has requested that the right of way be conveyed
to the Commonwealth. Conveyance of county property requires a public hearing.
Approval is recommended.
District: Bermuda
Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No
~~oo9s
VICINITY SKETCH
PUBLIC HEARING: To Consider the Conveyance of County Property
for the Widening of Route 10 (I-95 to Ware Bottom Springs Road)
m
N
corpr~
oR
4~
~
fi
~
A
r
gATYEgy.~~
~
~w e
~ ~~ RD
~ti
~¢~ ~ U
R n O y
n ~
x o v
~+ ~ ~ ~S
a
~c ~
a
UT
M ~`~, CkESTNU7 ,,
2
d ~ $~ kr« Cnf a
~
~
a
EXIT 61
~ ~ w~U~~EO
~ +~O
0
~'PQ
WARE BOTTOM SPRSt~G RD
~¢ ~ \
¢
4WAS~O QRO~ ~
N
R~
'A y
g-
1OHK l_To~ a o
~
~
~
ARKERS BATTERY RD r
d
A
o
~ ~
~8~
o~ fi
~°
a 4~
~
R
N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities
W j• E
S
t ua - t,o0otet
000096
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
_ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1
AGENDA
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 16.C.
Subject:
PUBLIC HEARING: Request to Quitclaim Portions of a 95-Foot and a 70-Foot
Right of Way West of Warbro Road
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County
Administrator to execute quitclaim deeds to vacate portions of a 95' and 70'
right of way west of Warbro Road.
Summary of Information:
Martin-Marietta Materials, Inc. has requested the vacation of portions of a
95' and 70' right of way west of Warbro Road as shown on the attached plat.
This request has been reviewed by county staff and Comcast Cablevision.
Approval is recommended.
District: Clover Hill
Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No #
00009'7
VICINITY SKETCH
Request to Quitclaim Portions of a 95'
and 70' Right of Way West of Warbro Road
4~-
REl]UEST TO QUITCLAIM gq4
PCIRTIONS OF A 9a' RIGHT.
OF VYAY ~ ~ ~ .~ 4~
REQU~afi TO Qt11TCLAIM
A70' RIGHT OF I~IY
~~P~
N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities ,
w ;~ E
s
1 hol -fi66.67 tet
O~oo.JV
v
d y~
OVVmz +~
~~ ~ - ~ oo W
C z
C{{~~~• m o $ :, o
~ C
'~ r
~~ y~b~ ~ ,
~ ~~
~ o .~ ,
O`o _-, ~
rrr
_ rr
r O
rrr ~• a0
~~
G7 O ~ 4/ o
v
• Z Z O ~'J
m ~` bo z
w~? ° , ~~<
m / - m ca m
a i~b'~
~r.r•---...vr
____ r~ r
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr O n
o ~ 4~
o ~
'a c
~~o
~ °~~ /
,k
~ ~ °^~
~ ~ba/
m
~~_ o
vZ
0
2
o ~ /~
.-~^f d
d
~,~,. d
d
a
d
d
O
~
w
o ~
=
~
m D ~
< v o
~ ~
D n
O °°
m
-
j <
~ ~ n
v
rn
1
A;
~,
~a
,~
y
~: m
`i
~.
O
~Z
vzm
~o
w w Z
~~m
co W
~~~
~ m
oZ
~~N
O
ri
vim ~
00Z~
~~77 V <
~
~
'~ OD '~
v j Z W i n
~ ~ ~ (~ ~ V ~
n C
~ N
~ ~
.. n~~
ww.e.aa ri.aN.~. w w,c ~..: ~-
RIGHT OF WAY VACATION ~
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC. %73 -~ se.a Row ot~t-~o w6
s
MIDLOTHUW QUARRY ~"1D"a• ~'a" ~ .r,,,,, ~,,,,
P6a~ (004) 071-0617 Faz: (804) 8759677
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY,VIRGINUI vwbsllKMwwdrrr6nroryly.aoro p,2pp w~
~~®09~
February 10, 2010
Speaker's List
Evening Session #1
(Following Presentation of Resolutions)
1. A4a p
~. Bob Herndon
'~~ Heather Hart
~. Will Shewmake (Leslie Haley)
~~ ~~G Ids ~' 1 ~
Evening Session #2
(End of the Evening Agenda)
1:
~~ Stella Edwards
'~.~ Deb Dudley
~~ Ann Herndon
~: o~ ~ ~ Grua 5e ~
~ ~Jl.~~ ; ~~~
t .;,,
BRENDA L. STEWART
5911 Woodpecker Road
Chesterfield, VA 23838
Phone/Fax: (804) 590-2309
E-mail: bl-stewartCa~comcast.net
February 10, 2010
REMARKS TO THE CHESTERFIELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DURING
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
If it were all about the children, then we would have much better managed
schools. If it were all about the children, then the teachers and those working
directly with the children would be the last to be cut when the money has to be
apportioned.
If it were all about the money, then Washington, D.C. would have the best
educated students in this country. According to Andrew Coulson of Cato
Institute: "We're often told that public schools are underfunded. In the District, ...
total spending is close to $25,000 per child -- on par with tuition at Sidwell
Friends, the private school Chelsea Clinton attended in the 1990s." For
comparison, total per pupil spending at D.C. area private schools -- among the
most upscale in the nation -- averages about $10,000 less. For most private
schools, the difference is even greater. "
The spending figure per pupil that is reported to us in Virginia counts only part of
the total local school budget, and only part of the operating budget at that. Debt
service is omitted, and several other school funds are not included in that figure.
Mr. Coulson also reports that we have spent more than $100 billion on the Head
Start program to date. The finding by Health & Human Services in a study
released early last month: "...virtually all academic effects disappear by the end
of first grade." Why continue to fund pre-K?
The Superintendent recently wrote to the County Administrator about the
"challenge" of the last few years when the tax rate was reduced, 1 offer you some
statistics from the school system's Financial Plan for the current year. From FY
1999 to 2009, the local personal property and real estate taxes allocated to the
School Board rose from $145M to $265M, an increase of 77%. Allocations to the
school system did not decrease even when the tax rate decreased. During that
time the increase in students was 16%. As recently as FY 2008, the school
system received from the county an increase of $20.3M or 9% over the previous
year. That year there was only an eight-tenths of one per cent increase in
students.
~,~
2
I reported to the School Board in March 2008 that in three years, the school
system's revenues in reserves rose 44%, total state aid increased 30%, sales tax
revenue rose 39% and funds from the county increased 25%. The schools'
Curriculum Audit Report advised that cost/benefit analyses were not being used
in deciding where to put the money. They reported that only 22.5% of the
available computers were being used for instruction or student learning. In
addition, the report showed that money was not being allocated based on
measuring the effectiveness of programs. Needs were not being assessed
before new programs are initiated. Decisions are not properly driven by relevant
data properly collected and analyzed. I don't believe much has changed.
Last night I reported on yet another improper handling of a purchase by the
school system. It appears they do not care how they spend our money. I have
revealed numerous examples of poor judgment or worse in school spending
large and small. It does not appear to improve.
Thank you, Board, for looking into school spending in more detail than any board
I can recall. I ask citizens to support you in this effort to be sure our tax dollars
are spent wisely. Do the same on the county side. There are options other than
a tax increase. The schools are not entitled to more money simply because they
hold up the children as a shield. Start the cuts at the top as I stated to the School
Board last night. Learn to prioritize. Families everywhere have to do that. So
should you.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1
AGENDA
,,.
Meeting Date: February 10, 2010 Item Number: 7s.
Subject:
Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting
Supervisors
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
of the Board of
Motion of adjournment and notice of the Board of Supervisors meeting to be
held on February 24, 2010 at 3:00 p.m. in the Public Meeting Room.
Preparers _ Janice Blakley
Attachments: ^ Yes
Title: Clerk to the Board
^ No