04-12-94 MinutesBOARD OF ~UPE~VISO~8
~ril iiz 299~
Mr. Whaley M. Colbert, Chairman
Mr. J. L. McMale, III, Vice Chr~.
Mr. Edward E. Barber
M~. Kathy ~. Daniel
}ir. Arthur S. Warren
Mr. Lane B. Mam~sy
County Admlnis%rator
Staff in Attendance:
M~, Barbara Bennett, Dir.,
office on Youth
Mr. Craig Bryant, D±r.,
Utilitie~
Ms. Terri Burgess, Interim
Dar., News & PubEis
Information Services
C~mmissioner of Revsnue
Ms. Marilyn Cole, ~xec.
Asst. to County Adman.
Asst. Co. Adman.,
Lsgis. Svcs. and
Interqovern. Af£air~
Mr. William D. Dupl~r,
Building official
Fire Department
Mr. Michael GoldenI Dar.,
Mr. Bradford S. Ha~0msr,
Deputy Co. Adman.,
Management Ssrvice~
l~r. Russell Harris,
County Ombudsman
~Lr. Thomas E. Jacobson,
Dir., Planning
Mr. Lou Lassitmr, Dir.,
Mr. John R. Lillard, Dir.,
Airport
Mental ~emlth/Retard.
Dar., Accounting
Deputy Co. Admln.,
Human Services
Mr. Riohard M. McElflsh,
Dir., Env. Engineering
Mr. ~tsven L. Micas,
County Attorney
Mr. F. O. Parks, Dar.,
Information Systems Tech.
Mr. Glen ~=taruon, Dar.,
Co,unity Divermion
Incentive Program
Col. J. E. Pittman, Jr.,
Police D~partmen~
Ms. Tharesa M. Pitts,
Mr. 3ame~ J. L. Stscrmaler,
Dir., Budget & Mana~emeAat
94-255
4/12/94
Mr. M. D. Stlth, Jr.,
Qeputy Co. Admin.,
Celerity Development
Dr. Robert Wagenknecht,
Dir., Libraries
Mr. Frederick Willis, Jr.,
Mr. colbert calle~ the regularly scl~eduled meeting ~o order at
1:05 p.m.
1, APPROVAL OF MINUTES
~.A. ~ARCH ~, 1994
On motion o~ Mr~ Barber~ seconded by Fir. KoKale, the Board
approved the minutee of ~areh 23, 1994 as submit%ed.
Vote: Unanimous
minutes of March ~o, 19~4 a~ $~b~itted.
the Gold Quill Award from the International Association cf
work Derfor~ed by ~s. Burgess on the Utilities De~artmen~
Annual
through national conpetlt~on in which the Internatienal
A~sseiatlon of ~uslness Comm~nicators reviews creative aspects
of publication for clarity, creativity, and coherency.
expr=ss=~ appreciation to Utilities Department employees who
their outstanding
On ~otien of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. ~arber, the Board
cancelled a Publlc Hearing to Con~±d~r Authorizing the County
Administrator to convey to
O~t~oned by the Cowry Fronting Ruffln Mill Roa~ ApDrsximately
~150-9-1-7 and, adepte~ the agenda as amended.
Vote: Unanimou~
94-256
5.~, ~ECO~S~N~ H~, FAY ~, W~ERo OHESTER BRANCH L~BRARY
Dr. Wagenknecht in,reduced He. Fay R. wilmer and stated
Wilmer ha~ ~v~d the County for 26 years. He
On motion Of the Boa~d, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, ~rs. Fay R. Wilmer has provided the citizens cf
Chesterfield County with quality library s~rvice from 1967 to
1994; and
WHEREAS, ~rs. Witmer has played an important role in the
early development of the library system and expansion of
library services at the Chester B~eneh Library; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Wilmer has served on numerou~ committees for
the library system, especially the adult ~iobion grou~; and
WHEREAS, ~r$. Wilmer organized amd pre~ented llbrury
program~ ~uoh a~ the successful twenty-fifth anniversary
celebration of the Chester Brunch Library.
NOW, T~EREFORE ~E IT RESOLVED, that the
County Board of Supervisors hereby recoqnlze~ the loyalty and
AND, BE IT F~T~ ~ESOLVED, that a copy o~ this
Wilmer and that thi~ re~olution be per,neatly recorded among
the papers of ~is Board of Supervisors of ~e~terfield County,
Virginia.
~. Colbert presented the executed re~olution =o MS.
~ccompanied by members of her family, and wished her well
her retirement.
Mr. Willis stated staff requests adoption of this resolution to
honor county employee~ who serve in the clerical field. He
introduced Mrs, ~andra Branch, Admini~tratlv~ ~ecretary for the
Construction Divi=ion of the Department of General Service~,
who was p~esent to accept th~ re,elation on behalf Of all
county secraturie~.
On motion of t~a Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the importance of professional secretaries to
American pBblic ~nd private org~nization~ ha~ be~n recognized
by the designation of April 24-3O, 1994 as "National
Secretaries Week"; and
WHER~A~, persons who serve Chesterfield County in this job
classification must meet high standards cf performance through
a combination of effective interpersonal abilities and
technical clericul skills, responsive ~nd courteous service to
citizens and fallow employees, an~ knowledge an~ application of
numerous County end departmental policieR and procedures; and
WHEREAS, the Administration wishes to express its
appreciation %0 all County senratarie~ for their ded±cutlen to
County team.
94-~97 4/12/94
NOW, TH~EPORE BE IT P~ESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes ell its
secretaries for their invaluable am~imtance to the County and
its citizens.
vote: Unanimous
accompanied by her son, and expressed appreciation ~er tha
~reSassional work County meorotari~s provide.
Mr. Willi~ intreduced Me. Cheryl ~arvey, Volunteer Coordinator
On nation of the Beard, the following resolution was adopted:
W~EREAS, volunteers lead the community in showing a
genuine self-sacrificing mpirit that b~nefits countles~
individualz; and
WHEREA$~ volunteering is recognized a~ an integral part e~
government and industry in contributing to the achievements
citizen~; and
W~EREA$, ~h~s~ volunteers have contributed signlflcantly
to the quality of life in our County, in our Commonwealth, and
in o~r Nation.
County ~oard of Supervinor~ h~reby declares April 17-23, 1994
our County_
present an ovmrvlew oS the Curbside Recycling Program,
specifically changes bein~ implemented prior to the effective
date of its service contract with the County.
~lr. ~yrnes stated the county joined mix other local governments
participating in the Cu~b~ide R~eycling Program in 1991. He
public education; cellection schedule changes; set-out time
Program ha~ averaged approximately $1~0 per ton und due to the
di~coUnt~ provided in the new contract, the Authority ha~
$60 per ton as its cD.rating goal. ~e then reviewed ohan~ea in
the sew recycling contract and components cf the Program. He
noted the Chesterfield iCurbside Expansion Kick-off Press
Conference will be hold ADril IS, 1994 at Winter's Hill circle.
Discussion, comments, and q~estion~ ensued relative to the
areas being serviced by the Curbslde Recycling Prog~cam:
restrictive covenants for suk~i¥i~ions us it applies to the
Program; the Program being of no cost to households receiving
the service as it is funded by the County; and notlfylnq civic
aasosiationu within the areas being aerviced about the ~=opram.
County and expressed appreciation to Mr. Byrnes for his
in developing the Program.
Mr, Byrnes then presented each Board member with an u~retla
from the Central Virginia Waste Management Authority.
There Was brief discussion relati¥~ to solid waste management
as it relates to regional cooperation.
Mr. Ramsay then introduced Mr. Masden who stated the Community
years and ti~e State Department of Corrections reoentl~
CDI staff soe~ed 100 percent on the a~dit. Be introduced und
recognized Mr. Paterson and CPI staff for thei~ e~cellen~ wer~.
~. Peterso~ e~p~ee~od appreciation for the reoognltion
stated the 100 percent ~core would not have been achieved
w~%hout tko har~ work and diligence of CDI staff.
?. ~RK ~ESSIONS
o PROPOSED FYP$ ~UD~ET
~r~ Ste~rmaier ~tated thi~ tim~ ha~ been scheduled for a ~ork
session on the propose~ FYP~ badger and following the budget
work ~e$~ion, the Board w~ll vote on adoption of ~n ordinance
relating to building inspoo=ion permi= fees~ an ordinance
relating to wastewater charges; an ordinance to establish an
annual tax leisy on various classes of property; the proposed
Fyi5-99 Capital Improvement ~rogram; the proposed FY95
operating budget; and adoption of the appropriation resolution
for ~Y~4-9~. He reviewed changes from the proposed F¥9~ budget
to the adopted FY95 budget including local ~ales tax -- au
increase in revenue projections by $~1,~00; property tax -- a
total r=Ven~e adjustment of $2,867,100~ fund balance -- the
cost being $415~000 to keep fund balance at 7.5 persent;
school~ -- net c~st being $1,755,680; State sales and use tax -
- $141,$00 being the transfer to schools; staff reco~endations
-- two n~w positions for the Museum; Internal Audit Department
-- transfer to schoola being r~duced by $3~,4Q0 ~o sever
cost of an auditor position; a~ increase of $40,400 in
and expenditures to allow the Police Department bo cover cost
for a grant which would continue funding a full-time crime
analyst; Mental Health Department -- revision of their
miscellaneous revenue estimates to cover increased cost of
psychiatric medicine and utility costs for the Roger~ Building
a% nu net cost an~ eight new ~o~itions needed to be created to
operate the two group homes at no ne~ cost; miscellaneous
$18,00Q needed to fund a ~eQond ~ear contribution to eontinu~
the Art~ in Education Program; Engineering -- net co~t being
$7,500 to r~duce the State's support fcr the chesapeake ~ay
Local Assistance Department; Health Dep&rtm~nt --
representing the County's 45 percent share in the increase to
the cooperative budget; Internal Rev=nee -- $7,200 in increased
rmvanua for revised es~imaZes for House Bill 599~ Library -- an
increase of ~7,90Q; and constltu~ional offlc,rs -- $?~,400 in
94-259
increased projections for salary increases for State employee~.
He then reviewed Board of Supervisors requests including a
replacement pumper for Ben Air Fire Department; additional
personnel to cover ~balance and fire unit staffing for the
Fire Department; four additional patrol e~flcers Ior uhe Police
Department; in~tallstlon of a fire suppression sy~te~ and
additional fun~ing for ceiling repairs and upgrades to the fire
suppression ~y~t~m at Epplngton; funds for completion of the
Henricus Read Projeot; fmnd~ for bleachers at Swift Creek
Middle Sshool ball fi~ld~; funds for repairs to the lighting
system at Man~l~e~ter Middle School ball fields; additional
social Services/Health Department po$ition~ to respond to the
School'~ request to provide enhanced community in-Sshool
programs; funds for three positions and four computers for the
Social Service~ Department; funding of the Co~%~unlty Health
Program for F¥PS; a donation to ~ha Virginia Opera; additional
funding for purchase of library b~oks; f~ for the
Rambl~wood/Point of Rook~ Drainage Project; and fonds to
r~plac~ the roof at LaPrade Library. He ~ted the mhortfall
in funds for t~e items reque~te~ by the Board could come from
r~venu~ from th~ Courthouse ~aintenance F~. He then rewiewed
misc~llan~ous revenue
There was b~i~f discussion relative to available funds in
budget for auto,atica n~e~ of the County.
~r. ~arbmr =u~ende~ staff and the Budget ~nd A~dit Co~ittee
fo~ thei~ effo~ts in development of th~ budget.
~. Stegmaier then reviewed c~anqes in~e proposed FY95 budget
to the S~ool f~d including $ta~e sales =ax; additional one-
'time funds; additional transfe~ fo~ Ope~ation~; reduction for
one a~ito~ position; additional State r~v~nue; and net
expenditures.
Mr. Ramsay stated as property tax revenue~ wewe ~valuated and
budget w~th 71 ~ercent of available funds ~esignated to the
S~ool System.
Mr. Daniel stated ~e County ha~ a limited amount of
tO allocate fun~ in providing all neoessary services and
school system is a top priority. ~e fur~r stated he feels
tax dollars for enhanc~n= of th~ School System.
~. Warren concurred with the co--eats expressed by ~- Daniel
and referenced a ~ee~i~ he a~d Mr- Barber held with
~le~entary ~ool ~TA r~gard~nq th~ budge% and, specifically,
local funding and the criteria used in assessing S~at6 funding
a~ i= relate~ to ~he manner in which the z~ucaCion A~=ociation
f~rthmr state~ he is concernmd a~out the imRact on ~h~ County
due %o %he manner in which State funding for local governmentn
member relay tkis info,atica ~o PTA represent=tires in their
.diztrictz to a~i~t in bringing thi~ i~sue to the forefront
next year.
million li~t of unfunded request~ but is generally
wi~h the FY95 budget. He further stated he feels the Soard and
staff has performed an excellent job in allocating the
to balance the needs of all Departments. He expressed
appreciation for the support and dillg~nce of staff in
Mr. Colbert e~ressed apprec~atlon to each Board member and
staff for their time and effort during thm budget process.
B. DEFERRED ITEMS
B.A. BUDGET ITEMS
TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO
THEC0DE.0F THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
AR ~MENDED. ~_;~FENDING ~ RBENACTIN~ BECTTON
6.4 RELATING TO BUILDING INSPECTION PE]~HIT FEE8
Mr. Ste~aier sta~ed ~he ~oar~ held a public hearing on March
30, 1994 to consider adoption Of a~ ordinan=e relating to
building inspection pe~it fees; an ordinance relatinq to
wastewater charge~; an ordinance %o establish an annual tax
budget; and a~option of th~ appropriation resolution for
There was brief diEcu~nicn r~lative to a~op=ion of ~e
budge~ and related items.
On motion of Mr, Warre~, seoo~ded by M~. McHule, the Board
~dopted the following ordinance:
OP CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS ~ENDED, BY
BE IT ORDAINED by the Boa~d of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
Chesterfield, 1978, us amended, is amendad and reenacted to
Sec. 6-4. Pe~i~ fees.
work for new construction, alteratlon, r~oval, demolition or
several provi=ions of ~e Virginia Unifo~ ~tat~wid~ ~uitding
Code shall De issued un=il =he fees prescribed in ~his sec%ion
~hall hav~ been paid. No ~ndn~nt to a p~it n~cessit~ttng an
additional fee because of an increase in the estimated cost
~e work involved ~hall be approved until =he additional fee
ha~ been paid. Ail such permits shall be isguad by the
building official on forms approved and furnished by his
office. The fe~ fo~ permits shall be based upon the project
COSU for labor and m=terials. Costs submit=ed shall De no lower
than tho~e listed i~ t~e Marshall and Swift Index or other
evaluation of building co~=s as approved by the building
official. Minimum accepted costs will b= adjusted annually on
official may assess additional f'~es when a review of ~ p~it
paid. Fees will be charged in accordance with the following
4/12/94
Finished square footage:
Minimum fee $
of the estimated construction coat $ 4.35
b. Unfinished interior square footage:
M±ni~%un fee ................ $ 50.o0
~sch $1,000.00 or fraction thereof of the
estimated cen~tructlon cost ...... $ 4.25
c. Unfinished exterior square footage:
Minimum f~o ................ $ 35.00
Each $1,000.00 or fraction thereof of
the estimated construction oo~t ...... $ 4.25
d. Residential A~itions:
Minimum fee ................ $ 50.00
Each $1~000.~0 or fractio~ thereof of the
estimated construction cost ........ $
s. interior remodeling and alterations, accessory
buildings and sheds co,ting ever $500.00:
~inimum fee ............... $ 35.00
Each $1~00O.Q0 er fraction thereof of the
estimated construction cost ....... $ 4+25
f. Carports, canopies, pole buildings, gazebos
And pavilions:
Fixed rAt~ ............... $ 35.00
g. Re-roofs, trim or siding ........ $ ~5.0o
h. Maaonry and fireplace replacement/relinin~
i. ~obile homes:
In ~obile ho~e pa~ks .......... $ 50.00
On prlva~s pro~erty ........... $
j. Residential namDorary c~r=ifioatsm of occupancy
& extensions ................ $ ~5.00
k. Residential request for ~ef~d (Administrative
l. Residential swimming pools (above- and in-ground):
Estima=ed cost of $~,000 or less .... $ 35.00
Each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof
of the e~ti~te~ cnn~tr~ction co~t . . . $ 4.25
m. Foundation pour inspections ....... $ 325.00
(1) If concrete testing is reqllired because
<~t-of-$p~oification ¢oncr~t~
utilized ........ $100.o0
in excess of one ho~ . . SLOG.00 (additional)
4/12/94
(3) Ac an alternative to the County's foundation
pour inspect±on, the building o£~i¢ial may
aeee~t inspection reports from engineers
acceptable to tho building official, oatiofying
independence, qualifications, and reliability
requirements pursuant to Section 110-6, Uniform
Statewide Building Code.
Commercial New Construction:
Commercial new construction:
Minimum f~e ...............
Each $1,~00.00 or fraction thereof cf the
ostimated COhO%ruction coot ....... $ 5.00
b. Commercial additions:
M~nlmum fee ............... $ t~0.00
Each additional $1,00~.00 or fraction thereof
cf ~he estimate~ construction co~t $ 5.00
c. Signs (BuiI~£ng P~rmit Fee):
~s=ima~ed coot of $2,000.00 or le~0 . $
~ach additional $1,000.00 or fraction
=hereof of the entimated conotruction coot $ 5.00
Tenant upfito, re-roofo, pavilions, pole buildingo,
repairs~ and renovations:
Each additional $1,0~0.00 or fraction
thor~0f Of the e~timated construction cost $ ~.00
e. Mobile office trailers:
Pixed rate ........... $ 3~.00
f. Co~eroial Swimming Pools:
=stlmated =out of $2,000 or less .... $ 100.00
Each additi0~al $1,000.00 or fraction thereof
of the estimated construction cost $ 5.00
g. Flag Dole:
Fi~ed ra%o ........... $ 35.0Q
h. Ten~s (greater than 120 sq.
Fi~od rot~ ........... $ 35.00
i. Commercial t~mporary ~ertificate~ of o~oupancy
& extensions .............. $ $0.00
j. Comm~r=ial ~equest for refund (administrative
charqe) . ............... 20% of fee
Au~iliarF
a. Electrical: When the co~t of labor and
involvsd in installation, alteration,
and/or repair is (rounded to the nearest dollar):
$300.00 or less ............. $ 35.00
$301.00--500.00 ......... $ 40.00
Each additional $I,000.00 or fraction th~roof
of estimated coot ............ $ 5.00
94-263 4/12/94
b. Mechanical: When the cost of labor and materials
involved in installation, alteration, replacement
end/or repair is (rsundad to the nearest dollar);
$300.00 or less ............. $ 35.00
~301.00--~00.00 ............. $ 40.00
$501 00--1 ooo oo $ 45 oo
Each additional $1,000.00 or fraction t_hereof
of estimated ooet ............ $ 5.00
Plumbing: ~nen the Co~t of laber end ~ateriale
involved in installation, alteration, r~place~ent
and/or repair i~ (rounded to the nearest dollar):
$300.00 or less ............. $ 35.00
$301.00--500.00 ............ $ 40.90
$~0~.00--~,000.00 ............ $ 45.00
Each add~t~enal $1~000.00 O~ fraction thereof
of estimated cost ............ $ 5.00
d. Gas: ~en the ¢o$t of labor and materials involved
in installation, alteruticn, replacement and/or
repair is (rounded up to th~ nearest dollar):
$300.00 ss less ............. $ ~5.00
$301.00--500.00 · $ 40.00
$501.00--1,000.00 ............ $ 45.00
Each additional $1,000,00 O~ f~aotion thereof
of e~tima~ed ~ost , $ ~.00
e. Active solar system: When the cost of labor sad
materials i'nvolved in installation, alteration,
nearest dollar):
$~00.~0 or le=~ ............. $ 35.00
$301.~0--500.0~ ........ $ 40.00
$~01.00--1,000.00 ............ $ 4~.00
Eao~ a~di~ional ~1~000.00 or free, ion thereof
of estimated cost ........ $ 5.00
Vets: Unanimous
TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO..A~ENB
THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CP/E~T~IELD, 1978,
adopted the following ordinance:
RELATING TO WATER CONNECTION FEES~ SECTION 20-35
4/1~/94
(1) That Sections 20-23 of ~he Code of the County of
Che~t~rfield~ 1978, as amended, is amended and reenacted
Thc service char~ec for water and wast~water shall apply
to all service rendered after May 1, 1994.
(2) That Section ~0-~4 of the Co~e of the County of
Che~terfleld, 1978, as amended, is amended and reenacted to
sec. 2~-34. Water connection fees.
The connection fee for water in th~ oo~nty shall be
capital cost recovery charg~ plus the meter installation charge
based on tho meter size and typo of installation in
with the following schedules:
(~) The meter in~tallation charges shall be as follows:
(c) Installation of residential outside
meter ......
(3) That Section 20-35 cf the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1978, es amondod, i~ a~snded and reenacted
read as follows:
sec. 20-35. Additional ~ervice and/or meter for eut~ide
censumDticn.
(a) Any customer may apply for and obtain an additional
service connection and m~ter for outside water conxumption upon
a~vanee payment of tbs applioable eon~oetioe Iae~ set forth in
~echion 10-34. This meter will be established as a separate
account and bo billc~ as a water only customer. Tho water
received through meter described above shall be for outside
consumption only and ~hall no= be discharged in any manner into
the wa~tewater system.
Any residential customer that also has wastewater service may
apply for a ceparat~ residential cut,ids us~ ~et~r to m~a~urs
O~tsid~ water consumption. Thi~ meter is to be in.tailed on
the ~ame s~rvice on which the household me~sr is ins~lted.
The meter will b~ installs4 upon advance paymen~ of the
applicable c~arge set forth in meotion 20-34 (2) c. This ne=er
will be billed for water commodity charges only as an
additional charge to the account of the household aster. The
water received through mater describod ahoy= shall be for
outside consumption only and ~hell not bo dischargod in any
manner in~o ohs wastewa~er system.
(4) That Section 20-37 of the Code of the County of
Cho~terfield, 1975, am amended, is amended and ra~nacted to
sec. 2Q-37. Water r~tes.
In all cases not ~svsred by contract made by the board of
supervisors prior to ~uly 1, 1977 tho consumer shall pay
charges in accordance wi~h the following schedules:
4/12/94
(1} Monthly service charges. The monthly ~orvicecherges
shall be a~ follows:
(2)
o o c
(5)
Chesterfield,
road an follow~:
Ancillary charges:
Type Charges
a. ~oxtaDle wa~er meter deposit $550.00
b. Bacteriological test [each)~ $ 16.00
*(~pplies only to new construction)
That Section 20-69 of the Cod~ of the Count~....~
a~ amended, is amends~ and reenacts~ to
Section ~0-69, Wast~water ~harges.
All consumers sh~ll pay all applicable charges as follows:
{1) Monthly ~ervice charges: The monthly ~ervice ~harge~
~all be a~ follo~:
month.*
b.
costs charge: $0,99 per aoo0~nt per
Uniform volUme cbs=gas: $1.013 per hundred cubic
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective May 1,
1994 for bills issued on er after July 1, 1994.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. ~arren, seconded by l~r. ~¢Hale, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANC~ TO ~STABLISH TH~ ANNUAL TAX LEVY
ON VARIOUS CLASSES OF PROPERTY FOR THB
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supurvi~oru of the County
of C~esterfield r~a~ for t~e year beginning on =~e fir~= day of
January, 1994, and ending on the thirty-first day of DeCU~be~,
1994, t~e.tam~ on propu~y in all ~-ho ~agiste~ial Districts of
the County of Ch~sterfleld shall be as follows:
5sc. 1. Real Property end Mobile Komes.
On tracts of lend, lots or improvements thereon and on
mo~ils homes the tax shall be $1.0~ on every $100 of assesse~
value thereof.
.Sec. ~. Per~onal Property
(a) On automobiles, trailers, boats, boat trai~ers, oth~r
meLur v~hicle$ and on all tangible personal ~roperty used or
held in conneetio~ with any mining, m~nufecturtng oN 0thor
business, trade, occuDation or D~efs~ion, including
furnishings, furniture ~nd applian~ss in rental units, the tax
shall be $~.60 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof.
(bi On aircraft a~ define~ by ~eotion 58.1-3503 and -350~
of the Code of Vir~nia~ 1950, az emended, the tax shall be
re,cue sqead~, volunteer fire departments, volunteer police
chaplains and by auxiliary ~l~ce officers as provided in
Sedtio~ 8-13.3, Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1975, as
amended, the tax ~hall be $.96 on every $1ao of the e~$essed
value thereof.
(a) On ~hat portion of real estate and tangible personal
property of public ~ervice corporation~ which ha~ been
equalized a~ provided in Section 58.1-2604 of t/~e Co~e of
virginia, 1950, as amended~ the tax shall be $1.09 on every
$100 of the assessed value thereof determined by ~he State
Corporation Co,lesion.
{b) The foregoin~ subsections to the contrary
public service corporationm the ta~ ~hall be $3.60 on every
On machinery and tools used in a manufacturing or mining
thereof.
vote: unanimous
OAPIT~L IMPROVEMENT PRO~P~%~
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mm. StEals, the Board
~dopted the proposed ~Y9§-99 Capital Improvement Proqram.
Vote: Unanimous
~.A.~. TO OONSIDER THE PROPOSED PY99 OPEP~TIN~ EUD~ET
O~ ~otion Of M~. Warren, second=d by Mr. McHale, the Board
adept~ the ~ro~osed F¥95 operating bud~s~, a~ amended.
Vo~e: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adopted the following re~slution:
A RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE DESIGNATED FUI~DS A~D ACCOUNTS FROM
DESIGNATED ESTIMATED RES~NUE$ FOR FY95 FOR T~E OPERATING BUDGET
AND T~E CAPITAL IMPROV~MtNT$ ~ROGRA~ FOE THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Bourd of Supervisors of thm County
(1) That for the fiscal year beginning on the firmt day of
July, 1994, and ending ca tke thirtieth day of June, 199~, the
followin~ sections shall be adopted:
94-267 a/12/94
Sec. 1 The following de~iunatod funds and accounts shall b~
appropriated from the designated estimated revenues to operate
~nd to provide a capital i~provements program far the County:
General Fund
Estimated Revenue:
From Local
GenaralPropsrty Taxes
O~her Local
Licenses, Psrmits, Fees
Fine~ & Forfeitures
other Local Revenue
State, Federal & Other Localitie~
Anticipated Fund Balance 7/1/94
Appropriations:
Clerk tO th~
County Administrator's 0ffi=~
~anaq~nent service~ Ad~inlstration
Building~ and Grounds
Registrar
Purchasing
General District Court
J~ Court
Magistrate
Circuit Court Clerk.
Fire Dep~rtmsnt
Communieation~ Center
~ew~ & Public Infer~tion
Mental Health/Mental Retardation/
Probation
Library and Law Library
~xtensisn Service
County Fuir
Community Development Administration
Economic Development
~lanning Department
Transportation
$t70,373,500
47,504,~OQ
5~485~100
1,099,600
12,109~900
53,361,0~0
6,~79,600
.23.415.9O0
317~7~,600
145;5Q0
~46,300
668,000
729,400
2l~,~O0
6~9,800
363,78~
4,454,400
1,~94,300
37~,DOO
598,900
97,~00
lr793,400
2,211~200
1~159.400
276,400
64,500
38,900
3,700
1,116,300
19,24~,200
17,935,000
15,877~90Q
37~00
3,100
~648,500
187,000
25~Q00
477,200
1,124~900
1,796,000
422,000
Building Inu~ectiom
Engineering and Drainage/NPDES
Street Lights and Roads
Non-Departmental
A~erican Disabilities Act
Debt service
Additional Transfer to Schools
Addition to Reserve for Capital
Projects - Schools
Nursing Home SubSidy
Fund Bulamce, 6/30/95
Total General Fun~
Com~reheoslve Services
~stimated Revenue:
From General Fund
From School Fund
Total Rev~n~e
Appropriations:
Operating Expenses
Total Comprehensive Services Fund
School ODeratin~ Fund
Estimated Revenua:
Federal
Beginning Fund Balance
Appropriations=
Instruction (includes $1,02B,900 for
comprehensive services Act)
Ad~inistration/A.&H.
PUpil Transportation
Operations and Maintenance
Food Service
county Grant Fund
Estimated Revenue~
Prom the State & Federal Government
From the General Fend
Total ReveDu~
Community Diversion Incentive
Vi~im/~itness Assistan¢~
Litter ~rant
94-259
2,483,000
1,97§,600
6~134~400
373,100
4,768,68~
184,200
4,Q61,60O
1~g,841,100
4,500,000
2,~52,400
~,131,000
44~,000
1~204~800
· ~1,830,900
$317,728,690
6Q9,100
989,000
1.Q28,900
2,627,000
2,627,000
10,545,100
91,]61,10Q
8,128~90~
24,205,?00
116.766.400
140r97~,100
251,907,200
169,960,037
8,513,721
10,598,1~0
26,174,142
27,606,200
2Sl,907,200
~,3~7,100
143,100
2,470,~00
172,800
417,900
94,600
~1,200
4/~2/94
Pretrial Release
community Development BloC~k Grant
Crime Analysis
Drug Prosecution
Total County Grant Fund
County CIP Fund
Interest ~arnin~
Transfer from utilities
Reimbursements
Transfer from General Fund
Total Revenue
~xpenditur~:
County Capital Projects
ReimBursement Transfer to Risk
Total County CIP Fund
Conntv Maintenance Projects
Estimated Revenue~
Transfer from General
Total Revenue
Appropriations:
County Maintenance Projects
Total County Maintenance Project~
Vehicle and Co~unications Malnte~ance
Sales
Approprlationn:
County Garage & ~oter Pool
Comm~nication$/El~ctroni¢~
Total Vehicle and
Maintenance
R~sk Manmuement Fund
Service charges
5eginnin~ Fund Equity, 07/01/94 Total R~venu~
A~propriatisns:
Risk Management Operations
Ending Fund ~quity, 06/30/95
A99ro~riatioas:
120,500
1,472,900
40~400
87,000
180,200
1~327~400
2~4~0.000
4,073,600
lr099~000
1~090~O00
17090~000
7~162~800
87~500
4.390.300
8,232~000
1,788,000
101.~00
1,889,200
Pc~a~_~md Ccur~er Fund
EetiMated Revenue:
Total Revenue 420,700
Appropriations:
Operating Expenses
Total ~o~tal and Courier Fund
Sales 98,300
Appropriations:
Airport Operations 386.000
Airport Capital Improvement Fund
Appropriations~
Capital Improvements
Appropriations: Operations
Transfer to County Capital Projects
Capital Projects
Addition to Improvement, Replacement Fund
Total ~tility
~9,~12,800
8,T0~,900
S6,00~
3.42g.000
44,$09,400
Soo. 2 Appropriations in a~dition to those contained in the
general appropriation ordinance May De made by t~e Board only
if there is available in the general fund an unencumbered and
unappropriated sum sufficient to ~=et s~eh appropriations.
Sec. 3 Except as ~et forth in Sections 7, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18,
19, amd 2O the County Administrator may, as provided herein,
authorize the traveler of a~y unencumbered balane~ or portion
thereof f~OM one classification of expenditure to another
~ithinthe same department or agency. Tho County AdMinistrator
may transfer up to $20,000 from the unencumbered balance of the
appuepriation cf one d~p~rtm~nt or agency to =nether department
or agenoy. NO more than one transfer may be made for ~he same
item causing the need for a transfer, unless the total amount
to be tramsferred for the item dOeS not exceed $20,000.
Sec. ~ The County Administrator may increase appropriations
Sar the following itemm of non-budgeted revenue that may occur
durln~ the fiscal yea~:
a. Insurunce reCOveries ~eeeived for daMaqe ~o County
vehiol~s or o~h~r property for which ¢ounty£unds have
been expended to make repairs.
94-271 ~/1~/94
............. L ............ ~.....~1 ........ L L L .......
b. Refunds er roimburseaucnts made tot he county for which
tho C~un~y has exp~nded funds directly related tat hat
refund or reimbursement.
c. Any revenue source not to exceed
Sec. 5 (a) Ail outstanding encumbrances! both Operating and
capital, at Juno 30, 1994 shall be reappropria%~d to the 1994-
9~ fiscal year to the same department and account for which
they are encumbered in the previous year.
sec. 5 (b) At the close of the fiscal year, all
appropriations lapse for budget item~ other than Capital
Projects, reserves for capital ~rojects, rs£unds for off-site
and oversize water and wastewater facilities, grants, street
light and three cent read funds, and donations restricted to
specific
Sec. 6 Appropriations ~Xgnat~d for capital prejectz will
not lapse at th~ end Of the fiscal year but shall remain
appropriations un~il the completxon of th~ project or until
Board of Supervisors, by appropriate ordinance or resolution,
ohsngss or eliminates the appropriation. U~Qa eompl~tlon of a
capital p~oject, staff is authorized to clome out the project
and transfer to the funding source any remaining balances.
This section applies to all existin~ appropriations for Capital
Projects at June 20, 1994 and appropriations in the 1994-~
budget. The County AcLmi~istrato~ may approve construction
change orders to contracts up to an increase c~ $1~,900 and
approve all change orders for reductions to contracts.
Sec. 7 That the County Administrator ~ay authorize the
transfer of Utilities capital Projects funds that arc ~0% or up
to $100,000 of the original project cost, whichever i~ less,
from any Utilities Capital Project to any u~hor utility Capital
~roject or to the original funding source. Should the actual
contract prise for a projest be ~fgn~f~cantly {over
less than the appropriation, the County Administrator may
approve transfer of excess funds to the funding source prior to
completion of the project,
Sec. ~ That the approval by the Board of Supervisors ef any
grant of funds to the County constitutes the appropriation of
both the revenue to bo received from tho grant and the County's
e~r~nditure required by the terms of the grant, if any. The
ap~roprlatlon of grant funds will net lapse at the mhd cf the
fiscal year, Put s~sll remain appropriated until completion of
the project or until tbs ~oard of Supervisors, by appropriate
resolution, changes o~ eliminates the appropriation. The
county Administrator may reduce any grant appropriation to the
level approved by the granting agency during t~e fiscal year.
Upon completion of a grant project, staff is authorized
close out the grant and transfer back to the funding source any
remaining ~al~ncs~. This ap~lie~ to appropriations for qrante
outstanding at June 30, 19~4 ~nd appropriations in the 1994-95
budget.
Sec. 9 Ths County A~mlnlstratsr may appropriate both revenue
and expenditure for donations made by citizens or citizen
groups in suDDort of County programs. Any remaining unencum-
bered balance of a restricted do~ation at the
en~ of the fiecal year w~ll be reaDpropriatsd into ~he
subsequent fiscal year.
Sec. 10 Th~ County Administrator may rmd~c~ rmvmnue and
e~psnditure appre~rlations related to programs funded all or in
part by the Commonwealth of Virginia ~nd/er the £$~aral
government to the level approved by the responsible state or
federal agency,
94-27~ 4112/94
Sec. ll The Director o~,the Accounting Department is autho-
rized to make transferm'~ the various funds f0r which there
are transfers budgeted. The Director shall transfer
as needed up to amounts budgeted, OX in accordance with any
existing bond resolutions that gp~ify th~ manner in which
transfers axe to be ~ade.
~ The Treasurer may advance ~enies to and fro~ the
various funds of the County to allow maximum cash flow effi-
ciency. The advances must not violate oo~ty bond co¥¢n~nt~ or
other legal restrictions that would prohibit an advance.
Eec. 1~ Th~ County Administrator i~ authorized to make
expenditures from the follow~ng Trust & Agency Funds for the
~pocifi=d ~oa~ons for which the funds were established. In no
case shell the expenditure exceed the available balance in the
fund:
a. M. W. Barnett Employee Award Fund
b. Special Welfare Fund
d. County Deferred Compensation Fund
f. Police Departiaent ~afekeeping Fund
g. school ~oard Memorial Fund
h. Riverside Regional Jail Authority
Sec. 1~ The County Admini~trato~ may ~ransfer worker's
Compensation funds and/or any amount of the Insur~nc~
£Und~ consistent with the County's Risk Management program to
department~, as needed.
sec. 15 The portion of th~ reserve for capital projects
related to the school budget will be ad,ed to the rsserve for
future capital projects in the general fund~ th~ portion
related to the school budget will be ~=~igna~od for school
projects.
Sec. 16 The County Administrator may appropriate revenues and
increase expenditures for funds received by the County from
asset forfeitures for operating expenditures dlr~ctly related
to drug enSorcemsnt. This a~plies to Sunds currently on-hand
at June 30, 1994, and all funds received iu the 1994-9~ budget
year.
The outstanding balance cf these funds at Jmne 30, 1994 shall
not lap~e but be carried forward into th~ n~xt fiscal y~ar.
~c. ~ T~e County Administrator may in~ea~e the go~eral
appropriation in the ~chool operating Fund contingent upon
availability of £~nding an~ taking into con~ideration~ any
other expenditures which ~ay have occurred ha~ed on the
following ~chodul~
a. Inor~ase general fund =ransfer/appropriation on
December 15 h~
b. InCrease general f~d transfer/appropriation on
February 15 b~
c. Increase'general fund transfer/appropriation om April
Sac. l~ After completion of all necessary audit transactions
for General Fund a~d School Operating Fundn, the County
Administrator may at hi~ ~i~cretlon, increase approgrlatlom~ or
a~tharize transfers of existing appropriations at June 30 as
follow~=
~4-273 4/12/94
a. ~ubsequent to all audit ad~u~t~entm and the ~nding
general fund balance is maintained at a maximum of 7.5%
of general fu~d expenditures, transfer all available
currenf year operatinq funds to the general fund reserve
fsr future capital
Tni~ a~pli~s to funds currently on-h~n~ at
30, I994, and all funds r=ceivod ~n the 1994-9S
budget year.
fumding sources for Capital Pru~eets,
rebates/penalties, and debt services payments an~ to
appropriate bond interest earning~ to minimize a~bit~age
rebate~/penaltles. This authority would include the
appropriation of transfer~ among funds to accomplish such
reallocatien~, Bndget~ for specific Capital Proje=ts will not
be increased beyond the level authorized by Sections 3 and 4.
This applies to funds currently on-hand in FY94, and all
f~d~ received in tk~ 1994-95 budget year.
Sec..._2D_ Th~ County Administrator is auti~orized to
among appropriation categories any amount of funds
with implementation of the Comprehensive sol'vices Act for
Sec. 21 T~e County Administrator is authorized to transfer ail
re~pnntive dnpsr=msnt~ relating ts use of excess revenu~
reserved from FY94,
$~e_ ~ Th~ County Administrator is authorized to transfu~ all
fund~ for the purchsse of items to comply with the American
Disabilities Act.
Vote: Unanimous
Reconven~n~:
8.~. TO CONSIDE~ ADOPTION OF TN~ PA~K~_.AKD ~ECREATION MASTER
9, 1994 =o con~ider adoption of the ~ks and Recreation Master
Supervisors, =he chesterfield ~usiness Council, and citizens to
adopted the Parks and ~ec3~e~t~on Master Plan as D~r~ cf the
Parks and Recreation Master Plan is filed with the papers of
this Board.)
S.C. A~POI~THENT~
O SOLID ~FASTE ADV~SOR~ CO~IT~EE
On motion of Kr. Daniel, ascended by Mr. Colbert, the Board
nominated M~. Donna Link and Mr. Tom McKinley, representing
Dale Magisterial District, =o servs oaths Solid Waste Advisory
CO~ittee, who~e formal appointments will be considered at the
April 27, I994 meeting.
Vote: Unanimous
8.D. STRE~TLISHT INSTALLATION COST APBROVAL
On motion of Kr. Colbert, seconded b~ Mr. Daniel, the Board
de£er~ed a st~eetlight installation co~t approval for
Brockridge Read, in ~he end of the cul-de-sac, in ~atoaca
~ugistcri=l District, until October 1~, 1994.
Vote: Unanimous
Kr. Ste~maier stated staff is recommending approval of the ~Y94
~id-year So,col b~dqet revisions including the Board of
Supervisors setting the date of April 27, 19~4 for a public
hearing to consider the increase in tbs FY94 tranafe~ to
sales tax which will be transferred to the Schools from the
General Fun~ end approval of the balance of the request with
the exception of nat approvinq the reduction in
budget due to the exclusion eS revenue~ and expendlturss for
the comprehensive services Act for At-Risk Youth.
On motio~ of ~r, Daniel, seoohded by Mr. Warren, the ~oard set
~he ~ate of April 27, 1~94 a~ ?~OO ~.~. for a public hearing to
con~ider an amendment to the ~Y93~94 budget to appropriate
$652,80O in anticipated addi=ional State sales te~ revenue in
order to increase the transfer to the School fund; transferred
$44~t00 from the Instruction Category to Debt Service and
reduced the appropriation for debt service by $1~,000; and
Transportation. (It is noted the Board did not approve the
SChool Board'~ requent to approve th~ reduotio~ i~ th~ School
budget due tc the exclusion of revenue~ and expenditures for
th~ Comprehensive Sorvic~m A0t for A%-Ris~ Y0~.)
Vote: Unanimous
8.~. APPOlNX~E/~T~
on motion of Mr, ~sHale, seconded by Mr. Colbert, the Beard
suspended its =~les at this time tO allOW ui~lta~eous
nomination/appointment of members ~o serve on =he charter
Review Committee.
Vote: Unanimoum
On ~otion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed Mr. William Funai,
r~pr~n~in~ ~a~¢a Di~tri¢~, and ~lr. Larry ~iller,
re~resentlng Clover ~ilI District, to serve on th~ Cha~ter
94-275 4/1~/94
Review Cemmittee, whose terms will bs effective immediately and
ara at ~he plea$~r~ of the Board.
Vote: Unanimous
9,C, STREETLIGHT INGTALLATION ~OBT APFROVAL
On motion of FL~. MoH~le, seconded by Mr. ~arber, the Board
deferred a ~tre~tlight installation cost approval for Vogt
Avenue, in the end of the cul-de-sac, in Bermuda I%agisterial
District, until June 22, 2~-
Vote: Unanimous
9.D. OOESENT ITEMS
9,D,1, ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION ESTABLIE~IN~ A LOOAL
GOVERNMENT A~D SCHOOLS..~E~ N~Y ~M~AIGN
On mo=ion oS Mr. Barbsr, seconde~ by Fir. ~¢Hale, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
~EAS, local goverr~ment and ~chool e~pl0yea~ ~n the
Ri~ond area have ~u~orted charitable organizations for aany
year= by pmrtlcipating in United Way campaigns; and
~ER~AS, employees have, at their option, b~n able
support both United Way member agencies a~ ~ell a~ other health
and human services agencies, by d~signating ~e organization~
that ~ill receive t~air oharitable contributions; and
WHER~S, recently, non-United Wmy agencie~ have sought
visibility in the 5~ual united way oampaign; and
~EREAS, local governments in ~he region reoognize =he need
to conduct a more inclusive annual oa~paign that enables
~ployees to support uge~eie~ t~at provide direct health
human services in t~e local co~uni~ while minimizing
and disruptions in ~= work
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLV5~, that C~e~te~field Co~ty~
conjunction with o~her localities in the region, will e~tablish
a Local Governm=nh and Schools U~ited ~ay Ca~pa~n to
coordinated by ~h~ ~ief Administrative Officers and School
Superintendents of each jurisdiction.
~D, BE IT F~THER RESOLVED, t~a% =he purposes of the
campai~ wiIl ~e
1. suDporu local co~uniuy needs direotly relate~
health and human welfare; and
~. Support agencie~ providing direct ~rvlcem in the
and llve; and
94-276 4/12/94
3. Provide a campaign, mechanism whie~ ~inimimes co,us
and di~ruptlons in the work place.
AND, BE IT PURTMER RESOLUED, that the County Administrator
shall develop and ~mDlo~ent pro,educes to conduct the Campaign
in cooperation with other participating jurisdictions. Such
procedures shall be ¢0nsisten~ with the purpones of the
Campaign a~ ~t forth in thi~ r~0tution.
Vote: Unanimous
WHEREAS,
intent and
th~ County,
million and
WHEREAS,
access; and
~ove~ent of
WHEREAS,
9.D.2. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION SUPPORTIN8 CYCLE SYSTEMS.
· NC. IN THEIR REOUE~T FOR INDUSTRIAL RAIL
On motion of Mr. Ba~be~, seconded by Mr. ~c~ale, the Bourd
adopted the followlng resolution:
CyCle Systems, Inuur~crate~ has ex,reseed its
desire to the Chesterfield County Board of
=0 loca~e and expand its industrial cperationm in
which will involve a capital investment of $3.5
create 2~ new jobs; and
thi~ h~siness and its operations will require rRil
thin railroad access is anticipated to provide a
75 to 150 rail oars per year; and
officials of Cycle Systems, Incorporated have
reported to the County their intent to apply for In,osiris!
Access Railroad Track Funds from the Commonwealth of Virginia
in the amount of $15o,000; and
WHEREAS, Cycle s~stema, Incorporated has requested that =he
Chesterfield County Board of Superviso~ provide a resolution
concerning support for its application for said funds which are
u~inister~d by thc Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEP~EYORE DE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
~aard a~ S~e~vieo~s hereby endorses and supports the
application of Cycle ~ystems, Tncorporat~d for $1~0,000 in
Industrial Access Railroad Track Funds.
AND, BE IT FURTMERRESOLVED, t~hat the County of Chesterfield
hereby makes known ~ts desire and intent to assist the Virginia
Department of Transportation in providing the maximum financial
assistance to Cycl~ Systems, Incorporated for the purpose cf
locating and exl~snding itu industrial facility in Chesterfiel~
County.
Vote: Unanimous
9.D.~. ~CCE~T~NCB OP DEED~ OP TRUST FOR ~ORT~A~B
DOW~PA~KE~T AND CLO~I~ CO~T AS~I~TANC~ PEO~F~
LOAN~
0R Rot~on of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. ~cHalu, the Boa~d
authorized the County Admluistr~tcr to aeee~ Deed~ o~ T~us~ aa
~ecurlty for Mortgage Downpayment and Closing Comt A~sistance
Pro,am loan~ for Ms. Myrtle Gall Holland, 7723 Secretariat
Drive, in the amount of $1,7S5.81. (It is noted the Mortgage
Downpalrment and Closing Cost Assistnnce Pro,ram is funded
through the Community Development Block Grant.)
Vo~m; Unanim~u~
94-27~ 4/12/94
L L L L _ I I..,
APPROVAL OF DONATION OF BU~ TO CRESTER ~MCA
O~ motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
approvod a request from the Chesterfield County parks and
Recreation Department to donate surplus School Bu~ #100
(Identification $1GDG6P1B3CVS~Q3~$) to Chester ¥~CA to be used
for various programs conducted by the Bermuda Run Advisory
Council.
Vote: Unanimous
REVENUE FOR PRO~PJ~HS FOR OO~I~ITY SERVICES
BOARD
On mo%ion of ~r- Barber, =econded by Mr. McHale, thc Board
appropriated federel revenue of $133,0Q0 an~ State Chapter 10
revenue of $79,500: increased grant fund expenditure
appropriations by $98,000; and increased Mental Health/Mental
Retardation/Substance Abuse Servises Department expenditUr~
appropriations by $108,500. (It is noted appropriation of this
revenue will not require any additional County fund~ and would
only be fO~ F¥94 a~ th% funds for FY95 have b~en inuluded in
Vote: Unanimous
9,D,6. ~FPRORRT~TION OF FUNDS TO REPAI~ HERIT~SE DRIVE
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. ~cHale, the Board
appropriated $250 from the ~ermuda Dietric~ Three Cent ~oa~
Fund to repair Heritage Drive. (It i~ noted a copy of the
vicinity sketch is filod with the papers oS this Board.)
HILL AVENUE. I~A~H ROAD. ~ND HOPKINS ROAD AB T~E
COU~TY~ FY95 d~E~T~PIELD RO~ FUND
On mo:ion of Mr. ~arb~r, seconded by ~. KcHale, the
adopted the following
~EREAS, Section 33.1-75 Of t~e Code of Virginia permits
matching allocation to uny County fo~ designations by the
9overning body of u~ ~0 25% o~ $500,000 whi~ever is greatsr of
funds r~ceived by it during the current fiscal yea~ p~uant
~he "state an~ Local Fiscal Assistance Act ~f 1972~ for
~r improve ~rimary an~ ~=con~ary highway ~y~e~ within ~uoh
County~ and
~S, the Chesterfield County Board of ~upervisors
appro9r~ated $500,000 f~r ~e Chestmrfiel~ Roa~ Fund with ~m
adoption of the ~Y 1994-95 Appropriation Ordinance; and
~ER~S~ ~OT ha~ notified the County that $500,000 iz the
maximum amount of Cho~erfield County f~nd~ tha~ will
~atched by the ~=ate during ~Y 1~94-95.
NOW, ~ER~FORE B~ IT RE~OLVED, that the ~e~terfield County
Bo~r~ of Su~ervi~or~ h~s appropriated $500,000 to ba matched by
the State for ~e FY 1994-~ Chesterfiel~ Road F~d, formerly
Revenue Sharing
AND, BE I~ FURT~ZR R~SOLVED, that the matched funds b~
~lloca%ed to the following projects:
$103,480 Forest Hill Avenue from Huguenot Road to the
Rich~ond City Lim±to Casotruotien ~$Sl,740 VDOT
and $51,740 County)
$438,360 N~b Road from Beaoh Ro~d to approximately one
mile south of Beach Road
Preliminary engineering and oonetruotion
($219,180 VDOT and $219,180 County)
$458,1~0 Ho~k~n~ Road from Iaea D~iv~ to Ceda~ Lane
Preliminary ongineer~nq and construction
($219,0S0 VDOT and $229,0~0 County)
AN~, BE IT ~URTHERRESOLVED, thut th~ Board requests1~DOT to
allow the County to proceed wi~h th~ Nash Road an~ Hopkins Road
projectm.
Vote: Uaanimou~
9.D.~. REP~RTO PLANNIN~ COMMISSION ANORDINAN~E TO AMENDTRE
On motio~ of ~, Ba~be~, second=d by ~r. McHale, the Board
referred to the Planning Commission, for their review un4
~eco~endat~os, an ordinance to amend the Code of th~ County of
Section~ 21.1-274 and 21.1~275 relating to zoning, specifically
to permit ~ite plan rscall by f_he Planning Commission.
Vote: Unanimouo
SET ~TN ~oR ~U~LIC ~RING TO CONSIDER AKE~DKENTS TO
CHAPTER ~$ ~ SECTIONS 21.1-17~ AND 21.1-281 OF
On ~otlon of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board set
the date of May 11, 1994 at 7=00 p.m. for a public hearing to
conm~der Chapter 13 relating to massage parlors and an
and 21.1-281 relating to the regulation of massage by the
County.
9.D.1~. ~PRO~LO~ ~H~N~ ORDER~ TO J. R. M~RTIN & 8ON~
on motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by ~r. ~e~ale, the Board
~uthorized the CoUnty Ad~inistrator to approve chanqe Order #1,
and c~hange Order ~4 to J. H. Kartin & sons, In~erpora~e~, for
tbs K$ithwocd/Kylton Park Drainugu Project. (It i~ noted
Rroject by $17,146.90.)
94-279 4/1~/94
9.D.11, ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION ]~AHXNG THE
DEPARTMENT ~UILDIN~ TN~ "RO~RT ~. PAINTER
BUILBIN~"
On motio~ Of M~. Barber~ seconded by Y~T. ~oHale~ ~_he Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHeReAS, ~r. ~ainter was instr~ental in f0r~tion of
Appomatto~ River Water Authority and neqotiated mutually
beneficial ugreement~ with th~ city of Richmond, %h~ City
Colonial Heights, and th~ City of Petersburg for wa=er and
and
WKEREAS, Mr. Painter had the for~ight to ac~ire the Lak~
Genito Dam site to provide for thm long-%e~ water needs of the
County; and
wastewater ~y~t~ d~ng a period whe~ the custom~ base
ino~eazed from 7,~00 to 41,000 ~spite lo~ing half of
customers due to annexation in 1970; and
~E~AS, und~M Mr. Painter's ~irection~ ~e County's
U=~lities Department grew to a position of leadership within
th= State.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED~ that the Chesterfield Coun=y
Department Building in hono~ of Mr. Robert A. Painter.
~D, BE IT F~TH~ RESOLVED, that a moPY of this resolution
be presented tc ~r. ~aintmr and ~a~ %hi~ r~olution
permanently uecorded ~ong %he papers of this Boa~d of
Supervi~or~ of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Vote: Unanimous
9.D.12.
CONSTRUCTION COWP~I~Y, INC. FOR ~RTIONS O~ TWO FOOT
BRIDGE~ TO ENOROACH WITHIN AN E~IRT~N~ ~g~MEN~
on motion e~ ~r. Sarber, seconded by ~ir. Ko,ale, the
approved a requ&~r from Ray A. Williams Construction Company,
Incorporated ~cr per,ions of two foot bridges to encroach on a
drainage easement across Lot 6~ St. Ja~es Woods, Section
subject to the e~ecu~ian e~ a license agreement. (It is noted
a copy of th~ vicinity s~eteh ia filed with the papers of this
Vo=e: Unanimous
On motion of ~r. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
approved the purchase o~ a parcel o~ land and associated
.easements along Rhode~ Lane, in the amount of $12,200, fro~M~.
James Moody Williams. (It is n0~d funding for th~s purchase
i~ available from theR hode~ Lane Proj'~ct Account and a copy of
the plat is f~led with t_he papers of this board.}
CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF P~tRCEL OF hAND
FOR EXPANSION OF~ATOA~A PARK PROM MR. GEORGE
AND MS. ~UDRE¥ A; P~RTIN
0~ motion of Mr. Ba~b~, ~eouded by ~r. ~o~ale~ the Board
approved the purchase of approximately 12.65 acres from ~r.
George ~. and M~. Audrey A. Per, in for expansion of Matoaca
Park a~d a~thorized the County Administrator to sign the
contract and necessary deed. (I~ is noted funds are available
to transfer fro~ a combination of remaining fund~
following completed park projects: Man,ester High school
($4,097); Et%rick Park ($9,910); Ettrick Riverside Park
($46,826). The~ fumds totalling $105,740 are for the purchame
purchase in January,
~ECTION III
On ~otion of Mr. ~arb~r, neconded by ~. ~¢~a1~, ~h~ ~oard
approved a utilities contraot for Foxoroft, Section III,
Project Number 9~-0~40, a~ £ollow~, which project includes the
extension of 575 L.F.+- of oversized water improvements and
authorized the County Administrator to execute any necessary
Developer: Delmarva Properties, Inc.
contractor: ~yt~le utilities, Inc.
Contract Amount: Estimated Total
Total Esti~ated County Cost:
Wastewa%er (Over~izlng)
(Refund thru connections)
Estimated Developer Comt:
Code: (Ovsrsizing)
District: Matoaca
$161,194.00
Vote: Unanimou~
9.D.16. A~PROVAL OF RBVTGED ~TILiTtES CONTRACT FOR
SOUTHCREEE# EECTION 1
On motio~ of ~ir. ~arb~r, ~econded by F~. ~c~ale, the Board
approved the revised utilities contract for Southoreek, Section
1 an~ off-site $~wer, Contract N~r~ber 92-0044, as follows,
which project inol~de~ the exte~io~ of 1,989 L.F.+- of off-
site ~ inch wastewater lines and authorized the County
Developer: B. Forace Hill
Contractor: cas%lo ~uipment corporation
Contract A~o~nt: Estimated Total
Total E~ti~ated County co~t:
Wastewater (off-sit~)
(Refund thru connections)
~stimated Developer Co~t:
Cod~: Off-site
$141,136.69
Vote: Unanimous
ACCEPTANCE OF Pi%R~'EL OF LAND ALON(3 ~g~ HUNDRED
aceepted~ em Dehalf of the county, the conveyance o£ 0.206
acres of land along West ~undred Road from Ks. Constance ~erz
Pinkler Goodwin and authorized the County Administrator
filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
lO,
on motion of Mr. Barbsr', moconded by Mr. ~cHale, tke Board
accepted the following reports:
Mr. Ramsey presented the Board with a report on th~ developer
water amd sewer nontract~ executed by the county Adminim~rator.
Mr. Raiser presented the Board with a status report on the
General Fund Malance; Reserve for Future capit~l Projects;
District Road andstreet Light Funds; a~d Leame Purchases.
Mr. Rumsey stated the Virginia Depart~ent of Transportation has
formally notified the County of the acceptance of the following
roads into th~ State Secondary System:
~DITIONS LENGTH
ARBOR LANDING. S~CTION S - (Effecti¥~
Route 4810 (Holly ~fbor Drive) - From Route 1569
tO 0.11 mile Northeast Route 156~ O,ll ~i
Route 4809 (oak Landing Drive) - From Rou%e 4~10
to 0.06 mile East Route 4~1~ 0.08 ~i
Route 4808 (Holly Arbor Court) - From Route 4~18
to 0.04 mile Northwest Route 4810 0.04 Mi
Route 4807 (Arbor Park Drive] - From ROUte 1569
to Q.09 male southwest Route 1~69 0-0~ ~i
Route 4~06 (Arbor View Terrace) - From Route 1~69
to 0.12 mile East Route 1569 0.12 ~i
DEER._R~N~ $_EE. Tj[_QN 8 - reflective 3-16-94]
Route 4724 (Chuteuugay Lane) - P~o~ 0.06 mile
47~ 0.lO Mi
Route 47~9 (Pharlap Court} - From Route 4724 to
0.04 mile Nor=hwezt Rou~e 4724 0.04 ~i
Route 4729 (Pharlsp Turn) - From Rou~e 4724 to
0.16 mile $outhsast Route 4724 0.16 Mi
WTNNERS,CIRCLE,AT,.,.~P_I~ CROWN
Route 4990 (Alysheba Lam~] - F~om Route 662 to
Route 4901 (whirlaway Drive) - From 0.05 mile
Fa~t Route 4990 to 0.36 mile Northwest R~ute 4990 0.41 Mi
Rou~ 4991 (Whirlaway Trail) - From Route 4991 to
0.08 mile Northwest R0ut~ 4991 0.68 ~i
Route 4992 (whirlaway Way) - From Route 4991 to
POXCROFT, SECTION 1 (~ffective 3-17-94)
Route 5200 {Fox Club Road) - From Route 662 to
O.13 mile Southeast Route 668 0.13 Mi
Route 5201 (Fo~ Club Parkway) - Prom Route 5200
to 0.53 mile Southeast Route 5200
Route 5202 (FOX Bria~ ~ead) - From Rou~e 5201 to
0.21 mile Southeast Route 5~01 0.]1 Mi
ROUte 5203 (FOX B=ia= La~e) - From Route 5202 to
0.20 mile $outhwes= Route ~202 0.]0 Mi
ROU~e 5Z04 (Fox ~riar Way) - From Route 5203 to
0,0U mile Southea~ Route ~203 0.0~
Route 5205 (Fox Briar Circle) - From Rout~
to 0.06 mile East ~oute 5282 0~06 Mi
Route 5206 (Fox Briar Court) - F~om Reut~ 5202
~OS~MONT. ~C/~Io~ - (=ffeotive
Route 5140 (Leefield Drive) - Prom Route 714 to
0,25 mile We~t Route 714 0.25 Mi
Route 5141 (Royenwood Road} ~ Prom Route 5140
to 0.09 mile Northwest Route 5140 §.09 Mi
Route 5140 (Leafield Drive) - From 0.25 mile West
Route 714 to 0.54 mile Southwest Route 714 0.29 Mi
Route $14~ (Aylesfer~ Drive) - From Route ~140 to
0.11 mile Northwest Route 514~
Route 5143 (Alyeeford Court) - Fra~ Rou~e 5142
to 0.03 mile ~ortheast Route 5142
Route §~44 (Whlteca~tl~ ~riv~) - From Route ~140
to 0.30 mile South Route 5140
ROUte 5145 (B~eughten Road) - From Route 5144 to
0.04 mile West Route 5144 0.04 Mi
vote: Unanimous
11. DINNER
On motion of ~r. Colbert, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
reoessed to ~he Administration Building, Room 502, Ior ~inner.
Vote: unanimou~
12, INVOCATIO~
~ir. Colber~ introduced Mr. Pete stith who ~ave the invocation.
4/12/94
i2o PLEDGE OF ~LLE~N~B ~O T~ ~ OF TH~ UI~T~D STATES OF
Mr. James Dickson led the Pledge of Alleqi~ce to the Flag of
the United states of A~erica.
supervisors meetings.
On motion of the Bca~d, t~e following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Deputy Burley H. Langford re=ire~ from the
Chesterfield County Sh~riff'E Office on MarC~ 18, 1994; and
WKE~EAS, p~ior to 1990, D~p~ty Langford retired from the
Marine corps and during his tour of eervi~a, received the
United ~ation~ Service Medal, the ~ational Defense ~ervice
WHEREAS, Deputy Langferd performed services as a dedicated
employee =o Allied signal and th~ 9~t~r~burg Police Department;
WHEP~EAS, Deputy Langford provided excellent security to
Judgea, jurors, and all others conducting bu~fn~Es in the
entrusted ~o the Sherixfls custody; and
WHEREAS, Deputy Langfcrd provided security for countless
Board of Supervi=ors meetings and was always recognized by hi~
warm smile and cheerful attitude; and
Chesterfield County and 'it~ citiz~n~ with dediCatiC~
enthusiasm.
Ssard of Supervisors publicly reccgniz~e Deputy Barley
Langford and extends, on behalf of its members en~ the citizens
of chesterfield county, their appreciation for hie exceptional
service to the County.
be appropriately prepare~ ~nd presented to Deputy Langford and
of zhis ~oard OS Supervisors o~ chesterfield county, Virginia.
Landlord and ex~ressed appreciation for his service ~t Board of
supervisors meetings.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
Willi~ D. Boyce on February $, X910; eno
94-284 4/12/94
WHEREAS, ~he Boy Scouts of A~erica was founded to promote
citizenship training, personal development, and fitness of
individuals; and
WHEREAS, afte~ ea~ing at least twenty-on~ merit badges in
a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in
e troop, ~ar~ying OUt a service project beneficial to his
community, being active in the t~oop, demonstrating Scout
spirit, and living up to the ~cout Oath and L~w; and
WHEREAS, M~. John David Mathers, Troop $91, sponsored by Eon
Air Unlt~4 Me%hodis~ Church, has accomplished those h~gh
standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought g~a! of
Eagle $ceu~ which is received by le~than two ps,cent Of t~ose
individualg ~ntaring the Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through his experience~ in scouting,
learning thc lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding
hi~sel£ on the great accomplishments ~f his County, John is
ind~ed a me~be~ of a n~w generation of p~epared young citizens
Board of Supervisors h~rehy extend5 its congratulations to Mr.
Vc~e: Unanimeus
accompanied bym~bers Cf his ~amily, and cengratulated him on
his outstanding achievement.
14. ~. RE~O~NT~IN~ MIDLOTHI~/~ HI~ SCHOOL,S POST PROM PARTY
Captain David ~ope. $~fety/Community Support for the Police
Department, introduced He. Nancy Peri and Ms. Barbara Roe,
members of Hidlothian ~igh School's Post Prom Committee, who
were present to receive ~he resolution.
on ~otion of the Board, the following re~olution W~ adopted:
WHBREA$~ the two highest risk nights for teens are prom and
graduation, with soma parents seeming ~o oon~one par=isa where
alcohol and drugs a~e available~ and
WHEREAS, et~deDts ~eed an alternative tu drugs and alcohol
to which they can and will say "YES"; an~
~H~R~A$, in 1992, 85 percent of virginia high schools
participated in Operatio~ Prom/Grad~ation's alcohol and drug-
W~EREAS, many parents of Kidlothian High School Juniors and
buminess communi=y, are working to provide an alternntive "no
alcoho! or drug~" party follewing the May 14, 1994 Prom; and
WHEREAS, communities all over Virginia are reaching in many
ways to their young people with love and concern, encouraging
them to "Celebrate Life".
NOW, ~EREFQRE BE IT RESOLVED, that th~ chesterfield Co=nty
Board of Supervisors declare the weekend of May 14-16, 1994 as
Drug an~ Alcohol-Free Among =he Teen and Adult Population of
Chesterfield County.
94-28~ 4112194
AND, BE IT PURTHER RESOLVED, that &~ults be encouraged to
provide a positive, no alcohol and drugs example for our youth,
particularly at the high risk times of prom a~d graduation, in
an effort that we not only change lives~ but save th~.
vote: Unanimeus
~r. Barber presented the executed resolution to Ms. Peri ~d
MS. Roe and expressed appre¢iation for ~eir dedicate~ work to
children throughout the County and their efforts in providing
a "no alcohol or d~ugs" party following t~e Prom.
ENTERPRISE
Hr- Stith introduced ~Lr. Jim Daniels, Vice Presidemt of the
Jefferson Davis Association; MS. Rea Hart, ~re$ident of the
Ampthill Civic 5~ociation; and ~s. sandy FOX, President of t~e
Bensley Area civic Asseaiation, who were present ~o receive the
On motion of the Doard, the following resolution wa~ adopted:
WH~EAS, a coalition of b~ineame~ and citizens have fo~med
associations to improve th~ quality of llfe and to invigorate
the economic activity alon~ Jefferson Davis Corridor; and
W~EREA$, these coalitions -- the "Jefferson Davis
A~uciation", the "Ampthi]l Civi~ Association", and the
"Bensley Area civic A~oclation" hav~ achieved numerous goals
through the volunteer efforts of citizens; amd
WHEREAS, the ~upport Of theme coallt~on~ were inst~ental
in obtaining thm designation of Enterprise Zun~ along a per%ion
of the Jefferson Davis Corridor; and
~E~AS, these coalitionm arm working with the co~ity
police to red~ce ~rime; and
~EAS, these coalitions ar~ working to improve economic
through individual contacts and group efforts; and
~MREA$, untiring ~ffortm have bmmn ~evoted to improving the
overall b~auty an~ cleanllne~ of ~he community; and
beautify the historical wayside in
WHER~M, these ooalition~ hav6 prO~Ot~d a partnermhi9 with
C~unty governmental agencies to facilitate change.
NOW, ~EREFO~ ~E IT'R~$OLVED, that th~ Ch~sterfleld County
Association", the "~pthill Civic Association", and the
"Bensley Area civic Association" fo~ their ~nt~r~ng and
selfless semite and co~itmen= to the bette~ent of the
.~ality of life and =he inviqora=ion of economic activity along
~e Jefferson Davi$ corridor.
Vote: Unanimous
Mm. Hart, and M~. Fox and ~xDre~aed appreciation for their
14.D. REOO~NIZI~ ARBUR~j INO. FOR T~EIR ~ENEROU~ ~ONATION
M~. ste~aie~ in~redueedM~. John Cogbill, ~ep~esanting Arburg,
Incorporated, who was present ko receive tho resolution and
mtut=d many corporations have bzen involved in improving the
quality an~ customer service of county gover~ent. He briefly
reviewed the Total Quality Tmprovem~nt (TOT} ~rogram and stated
by the dounty for its ~I training program.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
~ER~, ~burg, Incorporated owned a vacant office and
warehouse facility located at El00 W~itepine Road, Ric~ond,
Virginia; and
~R~S, Arburq, Incorporated. assisted Che~t~rfleld County
by providing a location to hold Total Q~al~tyI~p~ovememt (TQI)
training s~min=rs and a~dltional training s~ace nee0ed by
~ER~S~ Chesterfield County'~ Depa~tmant of Economic
Development contaQt~d Mr. La~mnce R. Bauer, repr~s~ntativ~
Arburg, Incorporated, who qraciously dona%ed the use of the
~=R~AS, Chesterfield County foun~ ~he use of the Arburg,
Incorporated building excellent for its TQI training need~; and
~REAS, the County'~ u~e of thi~ facility from
1993, throuqh March, 1994~ is valued at approximately
for these buildings at an undete~ined value.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of SuDervisor~ hereby expresses, its deep appreciation
Arb~g, Incorporated for their generous donation.
their facility.
~. Cogbill expressed appreciation on behalf Arb~g,
resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
the i~te~est and support of the business sea,unity; and
par~nerahip with Chesterfield County since I98~; and
~ERF2~$, ~he scolders 0ffi¢~ Complex provides an attractive
atmosphere for quality concerts; and
94-~$7 4/12/94
........... L L ~L ........ L .............. [ L ..........
WHEREAS, the' 19~4 Classic TunGs M~SiO Series will provide
the citizens of chesterfield County with three quality
and
WHEREAS, the Richmond Symphony wall perform twic~ in the
meadow area overlooking th~ lake; and
WHEREAS, the Kings of Swing will perfo~ O~ the ~th of July
with dazzling fireworks to culminate our nation's
Day; and
%~7~RFJ~, without the generous contribution made by Si~
C~ercial Realty, Incorporated thi~ serie~ woul~ ~0~ ~ave been
NOW, THZR~FORE B~ IT R~OLVED~ that the Chesterfield County
R~alty, Incorporated for their financial contribution
th~ 1994 Classic Tunes Music series.
AND~ BE IT F~THER RESOLVED, that the Board of
does ~ereby express its sinuer~ appreciation and gratitude to
SiVa Commercial Realty, Incorporated for their i~terest and
contributions toward ~ Music
expressed appreciation to SiVa Co~=rcial Realty for their
Huslc Seri~s.
~r. ~asden introduced Mr. ~enry ~srnandez, Vice chairman cf the
Equal Opportunities Committee of the Richmond Association cf
Realto~, who wa~ pre~ent to receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was
adopted:
WHEREAS, the citizens cf America enjoy the freedom of Ghelo~
more than any otheg nation on the face of the earth; and
WHEREAS, with this freedom we have, within our rights aa
granted tc u= by the Constitution of the United ~at¢~, the
right to fair and equal access to the housing of o~r choice;
and
WHEREAS, the Civil Righta Act of 1968 prohibits
discrimination cn the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and
national origin; and
WHEREAS, this protection was a~rganded ~y the Fair Housing
~ct ~umendments of 19S8 to include the handicapped and families
with children in Virginia to further include %he elderly as
protected cla~; and
WHEREAS, The Richmond Association of Rea~tors~ Incor]porahed~
· and The National A~oclatlon of Realtors~ have s~t aside time
The Key;" a~d
~EREA$, fair and equal treatment is a fundamental right of
all our nation's citizens, a right realtors aupport an~
promote.
NOW, THEREFORE B~ IT R~$OLV~D. the Chesterfield county Board
of Supervisore does hereby recognize the month of April, 1994,
az 'qF~ir Housing ~unth" and commend~ all those a~sociated with
promoting equal housing opportunity in Chesterfield and the
Commonwealth of virginia and calls its significance to the
attention of all our cltlz~n~.
Vote: Unanimous
~{r. Colbert pre,anted the ~cuted resolution to~. ~er~andez
and e~ressed appreciation for promoting equal hoa~ing
opportunities in the County and the State.
F~r. Hernandez ~ressed a~reciation, on bmhalf-of the Richmond
A~sociation of Raaltcr~ and th~ E~al Opportunity Co~itt~a,
fQ~ the rm~ognition.
I4,H. .RE~NI~ING ~PRIL 24 - 30~ 1994 A~ "NATIO~U~L CREDIT
EDUCATION W~EK"
~Ir. ~asden introduced MS. Eva JsD-~son, Ms, Wynet~a Wade, and
Ms. Gisel~ Carson, representatives of Credit ~rofe~sien&ls
International, who were present to resolve the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, understanding ~he nature of credit, its cost end
ben~fit~ i~ n~c~snary if our citizens are Co realize the full
benefits of their income; and
WHEREAS, the dissemination of informstion regarding credit
will help inform consumers of their right~.
NOW, THER~FORt BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors does hereby present th~ resolution to
CWI: Credit Professionals cf Richmond, Virginia in reccgnltlon
of "National credit Education Week," April 18-23, 1994.
vote: Unanimous
Mr. Colbert presented the executed resolution to ~s. ~ohnson,
HE. Wade, and KS. carson an~ expressed aDDrsciaticn for their
efforts in assisting citizens in understanding the nature of
their credit and i~s ~nefits.
~ RE~i~RDING B~SEB~L ~IELD ~LCCATIONS
15.A. ](R. ETEVEN D. JONE~
Mr. Shaven 0. Jones, representing Chesterfield Little League,
e~Dresned appreciation to the Board and staff for its efforts
in allocating baseball fields. He stated there ha~ b=en a
significant increase in baseball participation this year; that
there ere 1,200 additional children participating in softball
and baseball as compared to last year; and expressed cenoe~ns
relative to the lack of bas.ball fields in the County,
~peoifisally in the northern e~ee of the Co~nty. He requested
the ~oard to consider initia~ing a participation fee ~o assist
in raiuing funds necessary to construct additional f~elds in
through profit~ from County-owned concession stands or by
increasing the sales ta~ on eporting goods.
Yhere was brief disoussion relative to the increase in the
n~ber of play,rs participating in softball and baseball and
~e n~ed for additionul f~elds in the County.
Mr. James Wilson, President of Chester£i~ld Little League,
expressed appreciation for the cooperation amd efforts of the
County's Parks and Recreation Department in assisting the
League this year and to the Board for adopting the Parks and
Recreation Master Plan. He expressed con,ems relative to lack
o£ fields in =he County and maintenance of the fields and
stated hu supports initiating a participation fee.
requested ~e Board to consider allocating fund~ necessary to
addres~ these needs.
Mr. Daniel stated he feels the issue of additional fields and
the malntenan~e of ~ields in the County should b~
Re further stated he i~ not prepared to support a participation
fee at this time; however, he feels operational issues in this
area should be identified.
Mr. Warren clari~Xmd tho Park~ and Recreatip~ Mamter Plan
addresses many issues; that the Board has already a~r~ssed
many sports needs and is currently seeking additional land for
a facility to be designated a~ the Clover ~ilt Sports Complex;
that he feels spor~s is un area in which everyone benefits; and
requested staff to s~bmit reco~mendatlcns to the Board in
continuing to meet the need for additional sport~ fields.
Disuussien, comments, and questions ensued relative to the
Par~s and Recreation Advisory Ce~itt~e oon~derlng the
reallocation of ~xistiDg fields; deveSop~ng a committee to
prioritize maintenance and capital improvement
addressing the issue of a participation fee; fields being
constructed at Alberta Smith Elementary Scheol~ whether us~ of
Po¢ohantas State ~ark san be of assistance for Ceunt~
and the State Park ~y~tem leasing property to the County for
u~e of County sports.
After brief di~¢u==ion, on motion of Mr. Barber, zeco~ded by
Mr. McHele, the Board s~spendeo its rnle~ at this time and
amended the agenda by movin~ Itmm 16.A., a Public Hearing to
Con~ider Abandonment ~f a section of Wadsworth Drive ~e~ween
Commerclal Area~ Along Midlothian Turnpik~ and Residential
Aream to the South to Follow Item 16.C., a Public Hearing tn
Consider Granting Chesterfield Cablevi~io~, i~corporat~d a
Renewal of its cable Tslevisi0~ Franchise and to Adopt
Amsnd-~ants to chapter 7 of the Code of the County of
C~esterfield, 197B~ as Amended~ Relating to Providing Cable
~elevision Services in the County.
TO I~SUi%NCE OF P~/%KZNG TZCK~T$ ~Z OPPOSED TO
.M~. Mie&~ state~ t~is date and tim~ has be~m advertised for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance r~lat~ng to issuance of
parking ticket~ a~ opposed to aum~onse= for violating decal
adoption of th~ ordina~oe, which ~ould be ~ffe~tiv~ in 90 day~.
decals An general end statsd he supports rals~ng the ccet of
decal~ to assist in County ro~ improvements.
4/12/94
There being no one else to address thle ordinance, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of /~_r. Daniel, seconded by ~lr. Mc~ale, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OP CHEgTERFIELD, 1978, Ag A/~ENDED, BY AMENDING
~ND REENACTING SECTION 14.1-28 RELATING TO
I~SUA~E 0F PARKING TICKETS A8 OPPOSED T0 $~ONSES
FOR VIOLATING DECAL LAWS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Sea%ion 14.1-2~ Of the Cede of the Counfy__o~
~h~ete~el~, 1978, ~$ amended, is emended and reen~sted to
O O O
(e) Any violation of this article by the registered owner
of the vehicle shall not b~ discharged by palnm~nt of a fids
except upon presentation of ~atisfactery evidence that the
(2) That this ordinance ~ha11 become sffee=ive ninety
days afte~ t~e date of adoption.
Vote: Unanimoum
16.~, TO ~ONSIDER ~P~tN~EN~ O~EETERFIELD ¢~LEVISIONo
.I~.~_~_N~W~L ~ I~_..~ADLETELEVISION FRANCHISE
TO ~BOVIDIN~ CABLE ~ELEVIEION SERVICES IN ~NE COUNTY
p~bli¢ hsaring ~0 consider granting Chesterfield Cablevis~o~,
Incorporated a renewal of its cable television franchise and =c
adopt amendments to Chapter 7 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, relating te providing cable
t~lav~on ~rvlces in the County. ~e further ~tated Comcast
has recsaested a 60 day deferral.
T~e~e was brief discussion relative to deferrihg the public
hearing.
/(~. George Beadle~ expressed concerns relative to deferral of
the public hea~i~g.
Mr. Micas stated after advertising the public hearing, the
regulations that affect the franchise renewal process;
therefore, Comcast has requested the public hearing be deferred
for 60 day~ to review th~ i~pact of tha~ regulations.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
deferred a public hearin~ to ~ensider granting Chesterfield
cablevlsiun, I~¢erporated a renewal of it~ cable t~levi~ion
franchise a~d tO adopt amendments to Chapter 7 of the Code of
the County of chesterfield, 197s, as amended, relating to
providing cable television services in the Count~until Jhne 8,
1994.
94-291'. 4/12/94
TO ~ONSIDE~ AS~/~DONME~T 0F ~ SECTION OF WADSWORTH
public h~aring to consider abando~en= of a section of
Wadaworth Drive between co~eroial ar~a~ along Midlc~hian
T~npi~e and residential areas to th~ ~outh.
~r. Joh~ ~ccrauken, DireCt=or of ~ Co~y'~ Tran~portatiun
Department, ~tated ~taff has met witk a~ea residents on save~al
problems in the area- Me introduced representatives from the
Mr. Jim smith, VDOT R~dent Engineer for the
re$ids~ey, reviewed their cut-through traffic policy and VDOT~m
criteria for handling cut-throug~ t~affio. He stated the
County conducted a %raffi¢ ~tudy of Wadsworth Drive in 1991 and
in July, 1993 VDOT pe~fo~ed a ~ollow-up traffic B~udy.
introduced Mr. Lynwood Burner, Traffic ~Dgin~er
~. ~u~n~r briefed the Boar~ on me=hanismu in which data was
COll~Ctad for the ~tudy of cat-through traffic ~n Wadsworth
Br~ve and reviewad results of the study including 2~ percent of
total v~hicluu travelling Wadswor~ Drive wer~
traffic. Me noted VDOT ha~ a statm-wide policy ~at 40
of the total traffic volume repre~ent~ a out-~rough
that ~OT fOUnd no ~is~inguishable problem area~ ~i~accldents
iD that are~; and that luau than O~e pe~cent of all
exceeded the 3~ mph spe~d l i~it. He stated VDOT established,
through machine counts located in %he area, that i~ the
highest p~ak p~r~od being a ~riday; ~OT's study using
it was dete~insd that persons ~ere using Wad~wor~ Drlv~ as a
cut-~rough.
~. Smith ~tated he feels closing Wadsworth Drive will
adversely impact ~afety on Redbri~ge and S~ottingham by forcing
approximately z,~o0 vehicles to exit the area through tho~
road~ that it will add to e~i~tinq ~affic problem~ at th~
Providence, and at t~e corresponding intersections 0n
~idlotnian ~rnpike; and may sat a precedent for many other
neighborhoods in th~ county in pursuing similar re~ests, He
r~uu~nda=ions include~ ins=alia=ion of speed humps withiD the
neighborhood.' He reviewed several engineering ~tudies
highest hour, only 60 projected vehicles out of 215
cut=ing through the neighborhood; that no accident problems are
all ~ehlcles were traveling in excess of 3S mph; and
.vehicle~ per day to the ~mffic entering and exiting t~e area.
Th~r~ was brief discussion relative tothe anticipated
through.
Mr. smith s=a~ed due to the reasons addreose~, VDOT cannot
support the proposed closing of Wadsworth Drive, but remain
oo~itted to working with the neighborhood to reduce vehicular
speeds on Wadsworth Drive, as well as on Redbrldge and
Scottingham.
There was brief d±souseien relative to i~utallution of speed
humps; one-way streets~ and restrictinq turning movements at
certain intersections to as~iot in alleviatlnq this traffic
situation.
~i~. Barber stated spee~ humps have become popular in situations
~u~h as this~ that they red,cs vehicle speed, and mak~ cut-
through leoo eonv~nlent.
~Lr. Mocraoken stated VDOT'S eut-thneu~h pelioy was One in which
the County and Board of Supervisors did not support; that
Cc~ty~s objective at that time was to got a lower out-through
velu~e; that staff feels 1,~00 v~hieles a day is the maximum
amount of traffic that should be considered on a
timeframe in resolving thio situation; and that the subdivision
difficult to enter and exit regardle~ of how th~ ~ituation
with Wadsworth is addressed.
~r. Daniel stated he feels ~he decision regarding this issue
will affeot the closing uf other roads throughout the County
and requested staff to con~ide~ a County-wide practice as =he
decision is mud= on thio issue.
but will consider other cDtiono such aa spoe~ humps, cna-way
traffic, and restricting turnlan~ traffic. ~e ~tated this
quickly as possible. He inquired as to whether the County's
oSfer~ by WDOT in re~clvlng this out-through traffic
situation.
Mr. ~cCrac2con stated staff supports the optiono offered by
to assist in resolving this cut-through traffic situation.
Ms. cindy Taylor, representing =he $cottingham/whites=one
process in which traffic studies were conducted by VDOT; the
of vehicles on Wadsworth Drive. ~ha further
approximately 3U0 persons in the neighborhood ~upport the cul-
de-sac; that they are concerned about ~hsir ~roperty value if
that they are concerned about the oafety of resldent~ in the
Wadsworth Drive.
Mr. ~eter Ma~wetl, a resident of Whites~one Subdivision, stated
traffic sp~e~ o~ Wadsworth Drive as it r~la~s to ~afety and
the amount of out-through traffic on Wadsworth~ 'He further
inconvenience persons com~muting on this road. He expressed
concerns r=lati~e to trush being discarded along Wadsworth
to thc volume of traffic on ~a~swor~h; and safety concerns for
94-293 4/12/94
the children residing in the neighborhood. He requested the
Beard to support a cul-de-sac in the neighborhood and stated he
does not supp0~t i~stallation of speed h~pm.
Mr. John Momeqrin expressed appreciation to VDOT~ the Beard of
supervisors, and Csunty staff for their efforts in ~ddr~ssing
this issue and ~tated he feels it is necemsary tn address this
issue and traffic congestion, in general, is a problem in m~ny
areas of the County. He expressed concerns relative tc the
s~fety issues associated with Wadsworth Drive.
Mr. Bill Parsul, a resident of $oottingha~ Subdivision, stated
he sensors with the ¢o~l~e~ts expressed and ~efereneed the
General Plan when the p~epesal for ~he ~idl0thian Market was
underway a~ it r~lated to Wadsworth Drive ~t that time a~d the
vehicle count on Wadsworth. He s~ated he feels this traffic
$1tuatioD nssds to be r~olved as quickly as p~sible and the
~ope~al to cul-de-sac is the most viable solution.
F~r~ Jim Good~, a resident of Whltestone Subdivision, ex~ressed
concerns relative ~o the safety of children using Wadsworth
Drive and the ~moUnt of out-through traffic On Wa~swor~. Ee
stated he feels the children in the area are being deprived of
playing, riding their hikes, and walking to the bus etnD
because o~ %kc ~raf~ic and requested each Beard me~ber to
personally visit and obssrve the area to gain a better
perspective of the situation before a decision is made. ~e
~l~o expresn~d concerns relative to vehicle~ using Wadsworth
Drive as a cut-through when leaving nearby drinking
e~t~blish~ent~-
It w~s generally agreed to recess for five minutes.
Reconvening:
~Lr. Howard shapiro, resident of Solar On~ and an officer of the
Scottingham/whitestene Neighborhood A~ssclation, stated ha is
opposed to closing Wadsworth Drive and tha~ When th~ ~nltial
closed. H~ Sur~her stated he agree~ there i~ a ~p~eding
installing speed humps. ~e further state~ other option= should
bs addressed in resolving this situation and entered into ~he
rscord copies 'of responses from area citizens oppese~ to the
hours, less than 28 percsn~ sf vehicles traveling on Wadsworth
are cut-through traffic; that less than one percent of veh~cla~
usin~ Wadsworth Drive travel above the 3~ mph speed limit; that
Powhlte Parkway, the hospital, and shopping con=ers; that
closing Wadsworth Driv~ will force vehicles onto alreudyhighl~
requested the Board not to vote in favor of closing Wadsworth
Opposed tc closing Wadsworth Drive because it will seriously
enroute to emergency scenes, she further stated she supports
installing speed humps in the neighborhood; =hat the safety of
much traffic on Wadsworth Drive.
94-294 4/12/94
Mr. Clarence Smith, a resident of Solar One, stated all three
he supports inmtalling speed humps; that he feel~ most
~ubdivi~icns encounter vehicles speeding; that he feels access
to Wadsworth is necessary; and that area residents should take
all concerns into consideration.
Mr. Jim Tower stated ha residea in the area of Wadsworth Drive
and expressed concerns relative to ~he proposed closing,
specifically, to the impact of dive,ted t~affie onto other
roa~s.
)lt. Matt Hadley, a resident of Whlte=tone Dubdivision, stated
he feels other options should ba addressed before considering
closing Wadsworth Drive.
~r. Doug Bland, a resident of Solar one, expressad concerns
relative to diverting traffic if Wadsworth i~ closed and
other options should be considered such a~ utilization of ~hree
or four-way atop signs to help impede the traffic when
proceeding through the nsighnornood an~ using the natural
barrier created by the Powhite ~;Ccension on Redbridge Road as
three area subdivisions.
Ms. Rita Billis, a resident of Solar On~ mtat~d ~he i$
closing Wadsworth, mpecifimally to diverte~ traffic onto other
busy roads. She further stated mh~ f~el~ ~peed h~ps or three-
Drive is closed aha the inconvenience of going places.
stated he ~upport~ ~top lights on ~oh and Provi~eno~ Ro~
assist traffic concerns.
Mr. J~e~ ~aye~ ~tated he ~ide~ o~ the oo~ner of Scottingham
and ~u~twood; thA~ he concurs ~hat wadsworth has a traffic and
~peed p~oblen; that he is concerned about ~e ~afety of
children in ~e n~iphborhood; tha~ ~e feels th~r~ ate other
altern~tiv~s other than the proposed cul-de-sac to resolve this
Wadsworth Drive i~ closed.
relative =o emergency vehicles reaoAing tooation~ if Wadsworth
Drive is closed and indicated if ~adsworth Driv~ i~ clo~d,
will mainly affect approximately ~0 homes. ~e further ~tated
Wa4~worth Drive i~ the only c0ntr011~d intersection for
n~ghborhood~ of ~te~tone~ s~ott~ngham~ Solar One,
Ks, B~tty Thomas, a resident of Solar One, stated she
oppozed to clozing Wadsworth Drive as ~he feel~ it will pose
safe~y t~eat for people exi~ing and ~ntering the neighborhood
fro~ Redbridga or Providence. She f~rther ~tated ~he feels the
major~ty of citizens ~n the a~ea should 9re, ail; that the
~ajority has not prevailed; and ~e safest and.most practical
method would be to install speed humps.
f~ther stated she could support sidewalks.for safety reamons.
94-295 4/12/94
however, he indicated the county should not close Wadsworth and
e>rpressed conoern~ relative to funding of road improvements in
th~ County in general.
Mr. John Csgbill, representing the Hen~haw family who own 21
acres accessing Wadsworth Drive, expressed concerns relative to
the ~sshaw's property value; response time of emergemsy
vehicles reaching their de~=inatien; and in setting a precedent
for eloping oth~r reads if Wadsworth Drive is clo~d.
There being Do on~ ~1~ to address this issue, the p~blic
hearing was closed.
Mr. Warren commended citizens ~or their input and stated the
majority of concerns addressed foeuse~ on safety of children,
installation of speed humps, re~trlcted turn lanes, three-way
stops, and a certain a~ount of support for one-way traffic from
those who live t~e clo~ezt to it.
Whom asked, Mr. McCraeRen stated VDOT has not encourmged the
idea of ~top signs; ~owever, speed humps, restricted turn
lan~s, and one-way traffic signs are viable options to be
considered.
There was brief discussion rela~iYe to the location of the cul-
de-sac in ragar~ to th~ respoD~e time of the Police and Fire
Departments a~d cul-de-sacing sa~aratln~ part of tlu~
neighborhood.
Mr. warren expressed appreciation to VDOT for their
presentation and ~mquired es ts whether VDOT is willing ~a act
in an expeditious manner in addressing the options.
~Lr. Burner stated VDQT is committed to moving forward amd
finding reasonabl= solution~ to resolve thi~ situation and will
continue tu wurk closely with County staff and neighborhood
a~ociations. Ee clarified VDOT doe~ net ~pport ~nstalling
step signs for the use of speed control because of the
percentage uf ~ehiele~ t~at do not stop and they feel speed
humpm are a viable mechanism for speed control. He indloa~ed
thr~ or four way stop ~ig~ e~eate additional hazards for
citizens and restricted turn lanes may be an option.
Mr. Warren inquired as to whether cul-de-smcing in a~other
Iooa~iQ~ we~ld be an option.
l~_r. Smith stated VDOT ham little authority under various court
rnling~ however~ they will work with County staff and the
neighborhood in addressing the options. ~ further stated he
feels this issue nh0uld be a point commitment between the
County and VDOT. He expressed concerns relative to this issue
setting a pr6oedsnt and VDQ~ developin~ a cut-through policy to
ensure nelghborhocds do not become adversaries. ~a stated he
feels VDOT, County staff, and the affected neighborhmmde can
reach a solution in resolving t/~is issue in a fair and
equitable manner.
Mr. Warren expressed appreciation to Mr. smith for his input
and stated he feels an immediate aolutlon needs %0 be reached.
ar. Warren then made a motion for the Board to establish a
committee consisting of representatives from the Virginia
Department o~ Transportatipn (VDOT), Goun~y staff, the Clove~
Hill District Planning .co~issioner, and representatives from
each of the communities within the neighborhood, to address the
specific issues of speed humps, restricted turn lanes, three-
way s~op signs, the potential of one-way ~ra££i¢, a~d the
possibility cf considering an alternative location for a cul-
de-sac.
94-296 4/1~/94
~lr. HcHale seconded the motion.
~r. Daniel stated safety conomrns and the right for access on
public roads is a County-wide problem and he support~ Mr.
expressed regarding Whitepine Drive and Irongate Drive. He
further stated speed humps is an intriguln~ new idea and since
the proposed cul-de-sacinq Nill not be considered, he can
support the motion.
M~. Barber clarified that the motion included a possible
r~location of the cul-de-sac and inquired as to whether a
timeframe should be Dlaced on the committee bringing its
recommendations back to the Board.
When,asked, Mr. Burner stated he feels VDOT can address, those
options within 90 days.
F~. Colbert ~allsd fo~ th= vote, on the motion made by ~r.
Warren, seconded by ~r, MoHale fo~ t~e ~card to establish s
committee consisting sf representatives from the Virginia
Department of Transports=ion (VDOT), County ~taff, the Clover
Eill Distrist Planning Commissioner, and representatives from
each of ~hs communities within tho neighborhood to address the
way sro9 signs, the potential of one-way traffic, and the
possibility of consid,ring an alternative location for & cul-
de-sac and for =he committee ts bring recommendation~ D&ok to
th~ Board i~ 90 days.
Vote: Unanimou~
1~. ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Mr. ~cHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
adjourned at 9:§~ p.~. until April 27, 1994 at 3:00 p.m.
Vote: Unanimous
94-297