Loading...
2011-02-23 PacketCHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 20~~ Item Number: 2.A. Sub'ect: County Administrator's Report County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: The County Administrator will update the Board on the progress of various projects as requested by the Board of Supervisors. Preparers Lou Lassiter Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Assistant County Administrator ^ No # 0~~~~~ County Administrator's Top 40's List I. II. Critical Pro_~ects/Activities 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Airport Entrance Improvements Amelia Reservoir Proj ect Business Climate Survey Census 2010/Redistricting 2011 Community Risk AnalysislEmergency Service Coverage Countywide Comprehensive Plan/Public Facilities Plan Eastern Midlothian Re-development - Chippenham Square - Spring Rock - Stonebridge (formerly Cloverleaf Mall) - Streetscaping Electronic Message Centers GRTC Service Health Care Contract -Rebid Irrigation Policies/Demand Management for Water Use Mass Grading Ordinance Meadowville Interchange Postal Zip Codes Recycling Committee Recommendations Private Sewer Treatment Facility Sports Quest Ukrops Kicker Complex/Poseidon Swimming -Stratton Property Utilities Policies and Managed Growth Ongoing Pro_iectslActivities 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 2011 Legislative Program - adopted I1 /19/10 Airport Master Plan Animal Welfare Issues Capital Improvement Program Capital Regional Collaborative Focus Group Cash Proffers Citizen Budget Advisory Committee Efficiency Studies -Countywide Federal Stimulus Package - Energy Block Grant - Economic Development - Police Department - Recovery Zone Bonds Financial/Budget Issues Fort Lee Expansion Hydrilla Issue Joint Meetings of Board of Supervisors/School Board ooo~~a~N 1 Updated 211 / 11 County Administrator's Top 40's List 14. Magnolia Green CDA 15. North American Project (at Rt. 288 and Rt. 10) 16. RMA Work Group 17. RRPDC -Large Jurisdiction Committee 18. RRPDC -Transportation Strategies Work Group (work on hold) 19. Sports Tourism Plan Implementation 20. UASI (Regional) III. Completed Projects/Activities 1. Board's Appointments Process - 8/2008 2. Bow Hunting Restrictions - 2/24/2010 3. Business Climate Survey - 7/2008 4. Business Fee Holiday (Extension) - 9/201 D 5. CBLAB Discussions -12/2009 6. Citizen GIS - 5/2010 7. Citizen Satisfaction Survey -12/2008 8. Citizen Satisfaction Survey -12/2010 9. COPS Grants 10. Efficiency Studies -Fire Department and Fleet Management - 6/2008 11. Efficiency Study -Quality/Chesterfield University Consolidation - 7/2009 12. Electronic Signs -1 /2010 13. Board's Emergency Notification Process 14. Employee Health Benefits -Contract Renewal - 8/2009 15. Financial/Budget Issues - Adoption of 2011 Budget - 4/201 D - Adoption of County CIP - 4/201 D - Adoption of School CIP - 4/2010 - Bond Issue/Refinancing - AAA Ratings Retained 16. 457 Deferred Comp Plan (Approved) 17. Hosting of Hopewell Website 18. Impact Fees for Roads - 9/2008 19. In Focus Implementation - Phase I - 8/2008 20. In-Focus Implementation -Phase II (Payroll/HR) -12/2009 21. Insurance Service Upgrade (ISO) for Fire Department - 9/2009 22. Jefferson Davis Streetscape Project - 5/2010 23. Leadership Exchange Visits with City of Richmond 24. 2010 Legislative Program - 3/2010 25. Low Impact Development Standards 26. Meadowdale Library -11 /2008 27. Midlothian Turnpike/Courthouse Road Streetscape Improvements (Towne Center) 2$. Minor League Baseball (new team) - 2/201 D oooo~s 2 Updated 2/l/11 County Administrator's Top 40's List 29. Multi-Cultural Commission (Quarterly Reports due to Board) -11 /2008 30. Planning Fee Structure (General Increases) - 6/2009 31. Planning Fee Structure (Reductions for In-Home Businesses) -1 /2009 32. Planning Fees (Holiday for Commercial Projects) - 8/2009 33. Police Chase Policy (Regional) - 5/2010 34. Potential Legislation -Impact Fees/Cash Proffers -1 /2009 3 5. Property Maintenance -Proactive Zoning Code Enforcement (countywide) - 2/2009 36. Property Maintenance -Rental Inspection Program 37. Public Safety Pay Plans Implemented (Phase I) - 9/2008 3 8. Redistricting 2011 Calendar/Process Report 39. Regional Workforce Investment Initiative 40. Results of Operations -11 /19/2010 41. Sign Ordinance 42. Southwest Corridor Water Line - Phase I - 7/2008 43. Sports Tourism Plan -1 /2010 44. Sports Tourism Program with Metropolitan Richmond Sports Backers - 8/2009 45 . Streelight Policy -12/1 /10 46. Ukrops Kicker Complex -soccer fields -Opened 8/2009 47. Upper Swift Creek Plan (Adopted) - 6/2008 48. Upper Swift Creek Water Quality Ordinances 49. VDOT Subdivision Street Acceptance Requirements - 7/2009 50. VRS Benefits for New Employees - 7/2010 51. Walk Through Building Permit Process -10/2009 52. Water Issues/Restrictions 53. Website Redesign - 6/2009 54. Wind Energy Systems - 3/10/2010 55. Wireless Internet Access in County Facilities - 9/2008 56. Watkins Centre 57. Woolridge Road Reservoir Crossing Project - 5/2010 oooo~~ 3 Updated 2/1/11 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 7 i AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 2.6. Sub'ect: County Administrator's Comments County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Mr. Greg Wingfield, President/CEO of the Greater Richmond Partnership, Inc., will update the Board on activities of the Partnership. Preparers Janice Blakley Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Clerk to the Board ^ No # ~~~~~~ N L 0 N i G~ Q l/') ~~ s V iK. ..:i f~.t :~ ~.. ... 1. ..~ JU L J 0 N w M N i c~ i N LL N fC~ i O a..+ N Q O a V .~ O O v w a--+ ~ ~ L 0 O O ' Q .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a--r ~ ~ a--r ~ ~ ~ Q ~ L ,~--~ ~ l/1 Q ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - m _ ~~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~..r ~ ~ m ~ • X Z ~ m ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ O O ~~ LL . U '""' ~ ~~ W~ ~ L ~ V .~ ~~ ~• ~~~ (~W~ L ~ ~ ~ 7 W ~' y C. ~ J r W 4 u. ~ ~ W a~.^ O O N N i a--+ ~ ~ ~ 4~ ~ 4J ~ V ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ r~ ~ i ~ ~ a~ O ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ °; ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ._ ~ ~ N .~ s 4J > •- ~ ~ ._ '- O L +-+ c/~ cn Q ._ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ u •~ ~ ~ ~ ~' • ~ ~ O ~ +-+ • - ~ ~ ._ ~ .- X N L ~ U w a~ o ._ f i u Q a U N O O N ~ _~ ^' ~W ,.\{ /~ V~ ,~ Q ~ N .. ~ w •~ ~ ~ ._ ~ ._ ~_ ~ cn a--' a--+ i vi ~ ~ ~ ~ '- ~ ~ as--+ i ~ ~ c~ ~ 41 O ~ ~-~UZZZ~~~ ~ ~ aJ - a~ O o Z o Z L f~ L Q L .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ O ~ . - ~ ~ N cn • - ~ ~ +~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ +_~ N . - ~ O • - `~ vi _ .- ~ V ~ c~ 4~ ~' ~ V ~ ~ n ~ ~- ~ > O c~ ~ ~ . - a..r ~ ~ ~ ~ . - - c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ cn ~' ~ V ~ V ~ Q O ~ O O c~ ~ _ ~ - ~, cn U U O . .. L ~. ~ ~•-~ -. ~ ~ ~ oc ~ V V 4~ ~, ~, cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .- ~ ~ s ~s ~ E~ O u .- ~ ._ ~ ~ oC ~ ~ ~ ~ ._ c~ ~ N > ~ ~ c~ >. ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ V O .- m ~ ~ ~ a~ c~ os s-~ . ~ ~ d--+ a-.+ ~ ~ ~ 4J o ._ ~ a~ ~ ~ O •- u ~ O ~ N ~ ~ ~~i ~~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ (~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ s ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ r~ • •O a .. ~"~ ~h { Y ~i ~~ ~~ 5 7, '~ ~~ ~~ ? ~ j~ ti49'~`~ ~'eZ i~tit'~`'y'yi CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 5.A. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Mr. Charles L. Manson, Environmental Engineering Department, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Mr. Charles L. Manson will retire from the Environmental Engineering Department on March 1, 2011, after providing more than 31 years of service to Chesterfield County. Preparers Richard M. McElfish Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director, Environmental Engineering ^ No # Qi?QD~D~6 RECOGNIZING MR. CHARLES L. MANSON UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mr. Charles L. Manson will retire from employment with Chesterfield County on March 1, 2011, after providing more than thirty-one years of dedicated and faithful service; and WHEREAS, Mr. Manson began his career July 1, 1979, as a maintenance worker in the Environmental Engineering Department; and WHEREAS, in recognition of his dedication, skills and exceptional job performance, Mr. Manson was promoted to Principal Maintenance Worker in 1994; and WHEREAS, after acquiring a Class A Commercial Driver's License and showing proficiency in operating heavy equipment, Mr. Manson was promoted to Equipment Operator in 1998; and WHEREAS, Mr. Manson was a member of the road clearing team, keeping county roads and facilities open and operational during Hurricane Isabel in 2003, working long hours until the infrastructure was functional again; and WHEREAS, Mr. Manson was a significant part of county efforts to restore infrastructure damaged or destroyed by Tropical Storm Gaston in 2004; and WHEREAS, Mr. Manson was a charter member of the county snow-removal team, reporting to work under the worst possible conditions to ensure county roads and facilities remained accessible and functional during and after snow events; and WHEREAS, Mr. Manson was a member of the emergency road-clearing crew for twenty years, ensuring that county roads remained passable during tornado and ice storm events; and WHEREAS, Mr. Manson has exhibited pride and quality in the work he has performed in the Drainage Division of the Environmental Engineering Department; and WHEREAS, Mr. Manson performed all his duties with due diligence and dedication and has provided excellent customer service to the citizens of Chesterfield County, having received several certificates and recognitions for that service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 23rd day of February 2011, publicly recognizes Mr. Charles L. Manson and extends appreciation for his thirty-one years of dedicated service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to Mr. Manson and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. O~O~fl'7 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 23, 2010 Item Number: 5.B. Subject: Resolution Recognizing the Late Mr. Timothy Carl Webster, General Services, Printing Center, for His Service to Chesterfield County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Mr. Timothy Webster began his service with the Department of General Services, Printing Center on December 15, 1977, and provided more than 33 years of dedicated service before his unexpected passing on January 26, 2011. Preparers Robert C. Key Attachments: ^ yes ~ No ~ooa~as Title: Director of General Services RECOGNIZING TIMOTHY CARL WEBSTER FOR HIS SERVICE TO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY WHEREAS, Mr. Timothy Carl Webster joined Chesterfield County on December 15, 1977 as a Printer/Storekeeper in the Printing Center of the Department of General Services; and WHEREAS, Mr. Webster was reclassified to a Printer in 1978, and furthered his graphic arts education by successfully completing a course in Advanced Quality Printing; and WHEREAS, Mr. Webster received letters of commendation from customers praising his performance and attitude and was several times the Printing Center's employee of the year, most recently in 2010; and WHEREAS, Mr. Webster worked cooperatively with other printing staff as a valued member of the team and was a positive influence; and WHEREAS, Mr. Webster took pride in his work and showed respect for all people and their opinions; and WHEREAS, Mr. Webster was a dependable and reliable employee who performed his duties and responsibilities with competency and enthusiasm; and WHEREAS, Mr. Webster graduated from Total Quality Improvement (TQI) University in 2002 and the Supervisory Leadership Institute in 2004; and WHEREAS, Mr. Webster finished his work assignments in a timely manner, met required deadlines and sought to help others; and WHEREAS, Mr. Webster was commended for taking the time to deal with customers courteously, making each one feel important; and WHEREAS, Mr. Webster was tactful and considerate to everyone he came in contact with and attentive to their needs; and WHEREAS, Mr. Webster was instrumental in the department's successful implementation of a recent merging of printing functions to the Printing Center from IST, which increased the Printing Center's annual workload from 5 million copies per year to more than 12 million copies per year; and WHEREAS, Mr. Webster was recognized as a steadying influence in a sometimes hectic work environment; and WHEREAS, Mr. Webster was highly regarded both within the county and by vendors due to his work ethic and integrity, which was above reproach. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 23rd day of February 2011, publicly recognizes the outstanding contributions of Mr. Timothy Carl Webster, and expresses their profound appreciation for his dedicated service to the county. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to the family of Mr. Webster and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. o~o~~s :,~~ I~ ~ ~f it `t ~ --F`~ Fr"`4 ',.~t~ifW 1'; ~G S, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 23, 201 Item Number: 6.A. Subject: Work Session on Proposed FY2012 Projected Revenues and the Proposed FY2012 School Budget County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requesi~ The Board is requested to hold a work session to review projected revenues for the Proposed FY2012 Budget. Also, the Superintendent of Schools will present the School Board's Proposed FY2012 Budget. Summary of Information: Staff will review revenues for the Proposed FY2012 Budget, presenting information on the economic conditions and the impact on revenues. The Superintendent of Schools will present the School Board's Proposed FY2012 Budget. The County Administrator's overall proposed budget will be presented on March 7th. work sessions on the proposed budget will take place over the next two months. A copy of the revenue presentation is attached. The Schools' presentation will be provided at the meeting, reflective of actions taken by the School Board on February 22, 2011. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Manage Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No ~~~~ ., O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r r O N LL O O N O O O N LL O ~_ ~ ~~ O O ~ ~ O ~ +~ 00 V ~' ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ z. L V .~ N 1 ~. O O O O O O O O O ~ O ~ Cfl ~ ~ d' ~ ~ ~ ~ N= ~~ a O '' N °' ' LL_ T N ~ ~, O ~° N~ ~~ m O N LL O O N LL r r LL V/ W .~ L.. O c~ .~ .~ i V L N r LL ~c 1) Economic fundamentals a mixed bag 2) Silent majority beginning to reemerge 3) Widespread improvement constrained by weakness in labor and housing markets 4) As a result, still facing a lengthy and uneven growth pattern over next few years ooo~~~ ~ ~ .~ :~~~. ... . ~-~ ~~, ~~ 3 Y ~r'~~.~k ~~~ .. ~~ /'~ .~ ~.. .IVY ~ ~~ r~ -Ben Bernanke 1 /711 ~a~ ~ ~ ~;. ,. ,; ;~ ~-~ ~~ MIlkYYkYYMYYYYYYYMMYMMYYYfWYYMIfYYYNYYYk YYMIIYYYIt%kYIIYYYYYYMMYYYMYYYMYYfW YYYIIk%Mk MYMNYYY4YYf1YYYlMtY%MItY%YIfYYf11tYYYN%Yf11tY~idNIMYMNYMMMkMMYYYY1Nfl1YMYY7~M~ NATIONAL UNEMPLOYMENT , 11.0% 10.0% 9.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Ok: S% 4~ Local rate i'~as staalized at around ,. tS.$% l ~ Currently adding around 125~OQ0! nevi fobs per mQr~th ice: a~araged ~ ~~,aoo per month ,rt Ok: 5°~° ~~ January rate dipped, but IFRR dell to ~g,year law o~on:~~ TOTAL NEW HOME SALES 1,606.0 1,406.0 1,206.0 1,006.0 806.0 606.0 406.0 206.0 6.0 2001 ~~~~~ NORMAL MARKET ~'IIDDCAIT O~OQ13 2003 2005 2007 2009 Short Sale Foreclosures ^ Conventional '~ Distressed ^ Conventional ,, , . ,, , . , ~ ,. .~'~~ ~" ~~. a~ . ~~ ~,j~~;:3a ~:~I~~~~ ~I,.~I:~~:3,~~.~~~:i,1~~al:~tl ~:.:.1~'~'1 ~~~:1!~~ai~~f~`~~~ I~~,~ Virginia 2.73% 1.27% 2.51 % 1.26% Richmond 2 90% 0.88% 2.95% 1.09% MSA Chesterfield 2 74% 0.82% 2.79% 1.00% County _~.;, p, ...,. ~. ~y't'j, ~:;.ia~ ~ ,..,.~ „e.. ~ ,"F,. ..,., n' ,.y ~ ;,;, ~ ~~'•: .~ ...;,~.: 9 (. ~tT~y w w r,,,°e ~~rtmf ~'"i,.. N' ~,. 'Y%kY%%Y%Y%%%NN%NkN%%kYYMIt%%%%N%kNN'kNNNNY%IE%kNNNkNY%k%%%%%NNNM%k NNMkkk%%YN%NNMNY%%%k%Nk%NYNNNk%Nk%MkkkkNkNNk%Y%k%%%%%%%k%NMMINMIYMk~IMtIIMNYMIINMNMNIf%I!k%N% 1 HOME PRICES ,. Percent Change from Market Peak ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~'!'~ ~ ~q~`~45~' ~ ~~'~CQ ~~"@q~S C~t~Ct ~~~ 0 M ~ ~~' ~ ~~ie~ ! a'~ ~~ kS __ -57.1 % .... ~~ ~~~E ~~"~~:, oy c~+ a~. Qa o~ ode boo `~~a ,ee \\05 /~ ~a ~ ~ Gre 0~001~ United States 3.61 % 2.55% 3.43% 2.98% NEGATIVE EQUITY MORTGAGES - BY STATE Percent of Total Mortgages as of 3Q:10 Nevada 66.5% Arizona 48.6% Florida 45.5% Michigan 37.6% California 31.6% Georgia 28.0% Idaho 25.3% United States 22.5% Virginia 22.1 Maryland 22.0% Utah 20.7% Ohio 20.0% Rhode Island 20.0% Colorado 19.6% Illinois 19.4% New Hampshire 17.7% Minnesota 16.2% Missouri 15.7% 12,0 8,0 4.0 0.0 -4,0 -8.0 -12,0 ~KN1f ~ ~~ ~ ~ 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 o~o~1s U.S RETAIL SALE: Year-over-Year Percent Chang •~~ ~. ~. Furniture 10.0% -37.5% y ~~~~~ ~" Electronics 11.4% -20.9% - , t'~QY~ ~~ Home 13.4% -9.0% ~~ GS'~ CC~'r<"~+~5 Improvement ~'~~~ VM~~~~~b~~01N Groceries -2.4% 2.0% General -0.3% 7.9% Merchandise ~ ~~~ ~~~~ Hobby -5.1 % -14.1 % ~~~ ~~ ~,~~1~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ hin Cot g 7.9% -22.8% Subgroup Total 2.8% -6.2% U.S NEW CAR SALES ~ ~ ,U.S~ ~e~ ~c~~ ~c~~es 20.0 ~~ ~ I Quo ~~r 1 a.o ~ Q , b.o ~~: ~~ ~©~d ~o~s .bent 14.0 ~ mil. ~~q ~~Q~ its ~~~ ~i~v~~s ~n a 12.0 10.0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 oooo~s MANHEIM USED VEHICLE VALUE INDEX 130.0 125.0 120.0 115.0 110.0 105.0 100.0 95.0 90.0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 gall ex 9% ing 10 ~~~ ~.~~ ~ 1 ~ Overall, forecast is ~;~ y , ~ : ' generally f lat ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ :r ~~ r~~ Yy ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ + ~ ` t 2J Further deter~orat~on in j ' .~ ~ .,, ~ ~-~~ home prices ` ~ ~ .r .. 3J Offset by traction in local consumer spending ~~~~ 4J And, a turnaround in state ~~~ budget outlook '`~~~ r ~C,,, ~ ,.~; ,.,:,; 5} Developed within existing rate structure 0~4~J17 REVALUATION SUMMARY Year-over-Year Percent Change 20.0 , 15.0 ~ `~~ RESIDENTIAL ~~~;~ 2009: -1.5% 2010: -4.8% 10.0 2011: -5.0% 2012: -4.0% 5.0 ~~; 2013: -1.0% 0.0 kaa; ~;~ -5.0 ~ Residential ^ Commercial -10.0 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 LOCAL SALES TAX RECEIPTS 8.0% Year-over-Year Percent Change 1 ~ f p,~q~ ~~~~p~~ Taxes, pr~`~'~ ~o:. 6.0% lease by ,$6~~1 4.0% ~j Pro,~i~d b~ says above remised FY l j o.o% total -2.0% 3~ ~los~ gror~h l~'q% -8.0% C~pancy~ BPQI. 1~t@St ~@~~it11 -10.0 % 2008 2009 2010 2011 o~o~et~ ;~~ YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYVYYYYVVYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY f~,,1 ' ~ _ ; ~ ~~' , ,: ,., t `~ ~. fYYYYYYYVYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYVYYYYY4YYYVYYYYYYYYYYY'. ~~1 ~ ~}'~ r ~J ; ~. Jobless Rates November 2010 ->r-~ ~~ ~\~'~ States ,Counties ,3.liS <6.2 ,-. 6.2 5 < 7.0 ~7.~ 5 < 8.2 ~8.2 5 < 9.5 ~9.5 S 5 18.9 '^.: ! ~y ,~ q r ~'~ '~J" ;,im rr n.:.i fM R I ~ ~': hl( `"'!, ~• ir,?` ~Ye if o .~ ~ 'T i r n is i w ~ - ,,~yi " ~ :. r - ~~~~, ' :'„ '. ~ . ,~ • i/ i ~ ~a4 ~ ! U!~~..~F~~,t A ll ~,' 1~~ j~ ~ ~ i i nC ~~4rM Jai p~'.j ~'F ~~~~ f. f ~ '. .,,_,_i"~,.iklthi:,w,,.ri.6A,.i..iu..J'.a~St4i¢Ws.d~Y:,+R.•.lC~..!t~~~..~S~tiw..i~lli...,., J,4;,'!a, ~. .. ,.. ~... ,. .._ ~- _,~ , SINGLE-FAMILY PERMITS ':nw ~. ~ ~ ~~'~ ~ ~~ 350.0 Monthly Totals pr4~e~ted 10 decrease b~ $Q.4~~A 300.0 2~ l~~erest irkome oant`~-ves to dwindle 250.0 ~$5c r 200.0 ~~ t~Yelopmens reVenu@ ~enera~l~-fla# as 15a.o oommerdal active' of~s residen~iai 100.0 , ~ippgge 4~ ~ou1~ sorts fee 50.0 e~i~inated o.0 5~. Broad support' fc~r 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 ~~bside program ;~ , YYYYYYYYYYYYVYYYYYYIIYYYVYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYVYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYf c? I ~t _ Qfl0019 _. Property Taxes $359,185,100 $351,545,000 ($7,640,100) Non-Property Taxes $89,962,400 $96,351,800 $6,389,400 Permits, Fees, Etc. $38,569,000 $37,623,700 ($945,300) State Revenue $115,662,800 $122,337,800 $6,675,000 State Sales Tax for Education $46,400,000 $49,998,100 $3,598,100 Federal Revenue $10,035,300 $9,977,400 ($57,900) County Reserves $8,935,700 $6,573,600 ($2,362,100) TOTAL $701,025,100 $703,838,600 $2,813,500 ,; 1 J Can the resilient consumer continue to prop up the economy until broader correction can take hold? 2~ Even if answer is yes, we are f acing tepid revenue growth for the next several budget cycles o~oo~~ <..., ~. _ .: .. ~~ ~ ~~ ~ '\ r r r. 1~'. n-: .~ ,,,.. 'y , .~ tY y{ '..,,r~.mr.~m~~>.n~.,,,.,,•.::~.,.~-: m,m~,t.~..,,nwnw~,r,rr~>r~~•«,rw~~:..~.~u,n~•r~.~.:; ~,,.:•~:. • 3/7: Board work session on FY2012 budget • 3/9: Budget work sessions continue • 3/23: Public hearings on budget, CIP, tax rates, etc. • 4/ 13: Scheduled budget adoption Q'J~~~1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 O AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 201 Item Number: 7.A. Subject: Deferred Item - Consideration of Ordinance Amendment Relating to Attached Family Dwelling Units County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Request Recommend no action. Staff to monitor uses and if appropriate, recommend amendments in the future. Summary of Information: On December 1, 2010, the Board deferred action until February 23, 2011. On October 27, 2010, the Board deferred action on this proposal to December 1, 2010. Specifically, the Board held a public hearing on the attached ordinance amendment. Following the public hearing, the Board closed the public hearing and directed staff to address questions which had been raised. A list of those questions and staff's response is attached. On August 17, 2010, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider an amendment to the Code relating to attached family dwelling units. The Commission, following the public hearing, recommended approval. This amendment was initiated by staff due to concerns about the potential impact of the state mandated amendment allowing temporary health care units in residential districts. Generally, temporary health care units will not be compatible with the surrounding area and could potentially lead to further decline in "at risk" neighborhoods. Therefore, an amendment is proposed to Preparers Kirkland A. Turner Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No Title: Director of Planning #O~J~?2 O CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA allow, under certain circumstances, a two (2) family dwelling unit, or "an attached family dwelling" in residential and agricultural districts. It is hoped that by providing an alternative to the temporary unit, property owners will invest in their home in a manner that is compatible with the neighborhood. Currently, if someone wishes to have a two (2) family dwelling to facilitate the care of a family member, a Conditional Use must be obtained. The application fee is $1000 and the process takes at a minimum ninety (90) to 120 days. It is extremely rare for a Conditional Use request for a second dwelling unit, to facilitate caring for a family member, to be denied. The amendment will permit "attached family dwellings", with restrictions in residential and agricultural districts. The restrictions are more stringent than the standard conditions typically imposed upon a Conditional Use for a second dwelling unit, and provide for monitoring of the second unit to insure compliance on a continuing basis. During the Board's past deliberations on this item, concern was expressed relative to the fact that the amendment would not allow public input on the use and that the restrictions may be too stringent. Given those concerns, Staff recommends that the Board take no action on this amendment at this time. Staff will continue to monitor these types of uses. If, in the future, it appears that amendments may be warranted, staff will forward proposals to the Board for consideration. OJ4~J~3 QUESTIONS/ISSUES POSED AT BOS MEETING 10/28/10 RE: ATTACHED FAMILY DWELLING UNITS • What constitutes an attached family dwelling unit? Answer: A structure that has separate complete independent dwelling units for living, sleeping, eating and sanitation. In general, the existence of two kitchens would place the unit into this category. Further, one of the units must be occupied initially by a member of the property owner's immediate family who is physically or mentally impaired. If occupancy is desired initially by someone else, then, as is the case by today's ordinance, it will be necessary to obtain a Conditional Use. An addition that does not contain complete independent living, sleeping, eating and sanitation intended for occupancy by a single family will continue to be permitted by right provided the other requirements of the ordinance regarding setbacks and lot coverage are met. • The Ordinance establishes a maximum square footage, but not a minimum square footage for the attached family dwelling unit. Why is a minimum not established? Answer: The purpose of the Soo gross square footage maximum is to insure that the use remains secondary to the primary use of the property, which is one single family dwelling unit. The Virginia Statewide Building Code establishes minimum sizes for habitable rooms. The remaining rooms maybe of the size that the property owner feels meets their individual needs. • Will these units be considered for the purpose of determining permitted density in a project? For example, if a proffered condition restricts the number of units, will the attached family dwelling be considered a separate dwelling unit? Answer: No, these units will not be counted as a separate dwelling unit. This is consistent with the way that second dwelling units are permitted through Conditional Use where the occupancy has been limited to family members. (~+~041~4 • Occupancy limits for the mentally or physically impaired is discriminatory. Answer: The County Attorney's Office has advised that the purpose of this ordinance is to provide an administrative procedure to accommodate a family member who is in need of care as an alternative to the state mandated temporary health care structure. Our ordinance will continue to allow someone to seek a Conditional Use to allow a second dwelling unit where the occupancy does not meet the restrictions of the attached family dwelling unit ordinance. The category of persons permitted to occupy the attached family dwelling unit is the same as those covered by the new state law for temporary health care structures and the establishment of that category is a function of legislative discretion, not discrimination. • What happens if the planning permit is revoked because the property owner fails to comply with the restrictions of the ordinance? Answer: As is the case with any use, the owner will be responsible for bringing the use into compliance which will require removal of either the kitchen or a bathroom. Removal of the kitchen or bathroom will result in the unit no longer being considered a second dwelling unit. This is the same that would happen if someone obtained a Conditional Use for a second dwelling unit for a limited time period and for whatever reason the Board decides not to renew the Conditional Use. • What happens when the impaired person no longer needs care? Answer: Once the medical need for the unit has ceased, either: (1) modifications must be made such that two separate independent units no longer exist by removing one of the kitchens or bathrooms; or (2) both units must be occupied by the property owner and members of the their immediate family and spouses. Subsequent family members are not required to be in need of any type of care. Furthermore the second dwelling unit cannot be rented to, or occupied by, non-family members. • What is the purpose of the biennially renewal requirement for the planning permit? Answer: The renewal enhances the Planning Department's enforcement process. The Planning Department has experienced difficulty in enforcing the existing ordinance which has limitations on occupancy of a single family dwelling to family members only. Through the permit process for the attached family dwelling unit, the Planning Department will have an established date to proactively review and determine compliance with the or mance. aaoa~s AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, ASAMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 19-25,19-65,19-124 AND 19-3 O l OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO ATTACHED FAMILY DWELLINGS AND ASSOCIATED FEES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 19-25, 19-65, 19-124 and 19-301 of the Code of the County o Chester geld, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read as follows: ARTICLE II. AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTERJDISTRICTS 000 DIVISION 3. APPLICATIONS, FEES AND NOTIFICATION 000 Sec.19-25. Fees. In addition to any other fees required by the county, fees shall be payable to the county treasurer and submitted to the planning department upon filing the following applications: Application Type Fee, Based On Residential Uses Office, Commercial, and Industrial Uses 000 13. Planning p a. Attached family dwelling_permit 100.00 not applies b. Attached family dwelling permit renewal 0.00 not applicable 000 Q~J0~~6 2723:84073.1 ARTICLE III. DISTRICTS 000 DIVISION 4. R-88 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 000 Sec.19-65. Uses permitted with certain restrictions. The following uses shall be permitted in the R-88 District subject to compliance with the following conditions and other applicable standards of this chapter. If these restrictions cannot be met, these uses maybe allowed by conditional use, subj ect to section 19-13 000 Attached family dwelling, provided that: For the purpose of~rovidin~ record notice, a deed restriction shall be recorded setting forth the requirements of this section. The deed restriction shall be recorded prior to the release of the initial ply permit. A copy of the deed restriction showing_the deed book and page number shall be submitted to the Planning Department; A planning_permit shall be obtained from the Planning_Department for the attached famil dwelling. Biennially the property owner shall obtain a renewal permit. In conjunction with the requests for the initial and any renewal permits, the following shall be submitted: (i) documentation, as deemed necessary the Planning Department, to insure compliance with this section, (ii) documentation of the relationship of those residing in the dwelling, and (iii permission for a Planning Department representative to inspect, at reasonably convenient times, the attached family dwelling to determine compliance with this section. The Planning Department may revoke the initial or a renewal permit for any violation of this section; Only one attached family dwelling shall be permitted per lot; One of the independent units shall not exceed 500 gross square feet in area; At least one of the property owners shall reside in one of the independent units; At time of initial occupancy and thereafter for as long as one of the units is occupied by a mentally or physically impaired person, the following requirements shall be met: a. Occupancy of at least one of the independent units shall be limited to a maximum of two persons with at least one being a mentally or ph, sy ically impaired person; ooov~~ 2723:84073.1 b. Except as described herein, occupants of both independent units shall be limited to either immediate family members of the property owner or to the property owner's immediate family member s) and their spouse(s). Immediate family members include any person who is a natural or legally defined offspring, stepchild, spouse, sibling, grandchild, grandparent or parent; Provided, however, that one of the independent units maY be occupied by a person who serves as the legally appointed guardian for the occupant(s) of the other independent unit. The guardian's immediate family members and their spouse s) may also reside with the guardian; Provided, further, that one of the independent units ma, be occupied b~person who is employed as a caregiver for one or more of the occupants of the other independent unit The care fiver shall possess a medical license that qualifies them to provide care to the impaired person(s); c. In conjunction with the request for the initial or an, renewal planning_permit, the property owner shall provide to the Planning Department certification by a licensed medical physician that the occupant(s) of one of the units qualifies as mentally or ph. s~~paired persons, ;and (7) when one of the independent units is no lon eg r being used for the care of mentally physically impaired person(s), if the property owner wishes to maintain an attached family dwellin ,then the property owner must meet the requirements of subsections (2) throug~5), and the followin a. Occupants of both independent units shall be limited to immediate family members of the property owner or to those immediate family member(s) and their spouse ,s). Immediate family members include any person who is a natural or le~all defined offspring, stepchild, spouse, sibling, grandchild, grandparent or parent; and b. Occupancy of the 500 rod ss square foot independent unit shall be limited to two erp sons. 000 DIVISION 15. A AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT 000 Sec. 19-124. Uses permitted with certain restrictions. The following uses shall be permitted in the A District subject to compliance with the following conditions and other applicable standards of this chapter. If the following restrictions cannot be met, these uses may be allowed by conditional use, subj ect to section 19-13 o~o~~s 2723:84073.1 000 ,~ Attached family dwelling, provided that: For the purpose of providing record notice, a deed restriction shall be recorded setting forth the requirements of this section. The deed restriction shall be recorded prior to the release of the initial planning permit. A copy of the deed restriction showing_ the deed book and pale number shall be submitted to the Planning Department; A planningpermit shall be obtained from the Planning Department for the attached family dwelling. Biennially, the property owner shall obtain a renewal permit. In conjunction with the requests for the initial and any renewal permits, the following shall be submitted: (i) documentation, as deemed necessary the Planning Department, to insure compliance with this section, (ii) documentation of the relationship of those residing in the dwelling and (,iii} permission for a Planning Department representative to inspect, at reasonably convenient times, the attached family dwelling to determine compliance with this section. The Planning Department may revoke the initial or a renewal permit for any violation of this section; Only one attached famil, dwellin shall be permitted per lot; One of the independent units shall not exceed 500 rg oss square feet in area; At least one of the property owners shall reside in one of the independent units; At time of initial occupancy and thereafter for as long_as one of the units is occupied by a mentally or phys, icall~ impaired person, the following requirements shall be met: a. Occupancy of at least one of the independent units shall be limited to a maximum of two ersons with at least one bein a mentall or h sicall im aired erson• b. Except as described herein, occupants of both independent units shall be limited to either immediate family members of the property owner or to the property owner's immediate famil, member ,s) and their spouse ,s). Immediate family members include any person who is a natural or legally defined offspring, stepchild, spouse, sibling, grandchild, rg andparent or parent; Provided, however, that one of the independent units may be occupied by a person who serves as the legally appointed guardian for the occupants} of the other independent unit. The guardian's immediate family members and their s Ouse s may also reside with the guardian; Provided, further, that one of the independent units may be occupied b~person who is emploXed as a caregiver for one or more of the occupants of the other independent unit The care fiver shall possess a medical license that qualifies them to provide care to the impaired persons, ; ~~~~~~ 2723:84073.1 4 c. In conjunction with the request for the initial or an, renewal planning_permit, the ro ert owner shall rovide to the Plannin De artment certification b a licensed medical physician that the occupant(s) of one of the units qualifies as mentally or ph, sy ically impaired person ,s); and (7) When one of the independent units is no lon er being used for the care of mentally or ph, s~allX impaired person(s), if the property owner wishes to maintain an attached family dwelling, then the property owner must meet the requirements of subsections (2) through (5), and the following a. Occupants of both independent units shall be limited to immediate family members of the property owner or to those immediate family member(s) and their spouse(s~ Immediate fami~ members include any person who is a natural or le ,gall, defined offspring, stepchild, spouse, sibling, grandchild, grandparent or parent; and b. Occupancy of the 500 rog. ss square foot independent unit shall be limited to two erp sons. ARTICLE VI. DEFINITIONS Sec. 19-301. Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings: 000 Dwelling, attached . amily: A structure which contains two separate complete independent units for living, sleepin , eating and sanitation that have interior access to each other. One independent unit shall be used initially for a care ivg er's provision of residence and care for mentally or phyT all~mpaired person ,s, who is ,are) certified by a licensed medical physician as requiring assistance with two or more activities of Bail,, leg, as defined by state law. 000 2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. ~~~~~~ 2723:84073.1 5 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 4 ~„,~' AGENDA Meeting Date: February z3, 2011 Item Number: 8.A. Subject: Advertisement of Tax Rates for Tax Year 2011 and Advertisement of the Proposed FY2012 Budget, Capital Improvement Program, Community Development Block Grant Program, and Other Ordinance Changes Coun Administrator's Com ents: County Administrator: Board Action Requeste Authorize Advertisement of 2011 Calendar Year Tax Rates, the Proposed FY2012 Budget, Proposed FY2012-FY2016 Capital Improvement Program, the Proposed FY2012 Community Development Block Grant Program, and Other Ordinance Changes for public hearings on March 23, 2011 for these items as outlined below. Summary of Information: The Board established March 23, 2011 for public hearings on proposed tax rates, the Proposed FY2012 Budget, the Proposed FY2012-FY2016 Capital Improvement Program and the Proposed FY2012 Community Development Block Grant Program. Advertising requirements differ depending on the item. This item requests authorization to advertise the necessary public hearings in accordance with the state code. 1. Proposed Tax Rates: Tax rate assumptions used in formulating the Proposed FY2012 base line revenue projections that were presented at the revenue work session are listed below. Those are the same tax rates that were adopted for the 2010 tax year, noting the 2010 real estate tax rate of $0.95 per $100 in assessed value. Existing residential and commercial properties declined 5.0 percent and 1.0 percent respectively during calendar year 2010. The real estate tax rate to offset the changes in assessed value as allowed by the Code of Virginia (excluding new construction) is $1.00 per $100 in assessed value. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director of Budget & Manage Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # Ofl0~J31 c~ ~~ --~ 1749 ~RGlN11' CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 4 Summary of Information (continued) Taking a longer perspective, the tax rate would have to be set at $1.04 to adjust for the cumulative reduction in existing property values since calendar year 2008. The Board must advertise a rate for each tax classification for the 2011 tax year. Advertisement of a specific rate leaves the Board the flexibility to adopt any rate up to, but not higher than the advertised rate. The proposed tax rates to advertise remain the same as last year and are shown below. Real Estate (January, 2011) $0.95 Tangible Personal Property (excluding automobiles and trucks) and Real Estate for Public Service Corporations same as real estate Personal Property $3.60 Personal Property (automobiles and trucks) of Public Service Corporations $3.60 Personal Property Tax for members of Volunteer $0.96 Rescue Squads, Volunteer Fire Departments, Volunteer Police Chaplains, and Auxiliary Police Personal Property Tax for Wild and exotic Animals $0.01 Personal Property Tax for Motor Vehicles that use $3.24 "Clean and Special Fuels" Machinery and Tools $1.00 Personal Property Tax for Motor Vehicles, Trailers, $0.96 And Semi-Trailers with a gross weight of 10,000 Pounds or more Airplanes $0.50 Personal Property Tax for Specially Equipped Motor Vehicles $0.01 The Code of Virginia requires that public hearings on the budget and on tax rates be held at different times, but can be on the same day. Therefore, public hearings are planned to be advertised for March 23, 2011 as follows: Proposed Tax Rates: 6:45 p.m. Proposed FY2012 Community Development Block Grant Program: 6:50 p.m. Proposed FY2012-FY2016 Capital Improvement Program: 7:00 p.m. Proposed FY2012 Financial Plan: 7:05 p.m. o€a~~~w ~~ m. , CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Summary of Information (continued) Page3of4 Other ordinance changes that are being considered as part of the County Administrator's FY2012 Proposed budget include: 1) fees charged for planning and rezoning applications; and 2) fees charged for the Utilities Department operations. These ordinance changes will be advertised for 6:30 p.m. 1. Planning Department Fees. The Planning Department has benchmarked with other localities on various zoning application fees and is recommending numerous changes to the fee structure to be more in line with surrounding localities in lieu of structured on a cost recovery basis . The major fee changes for various applications that are being proposed by staff are outlined below: Existing Residential Existing Proposed Commmercial Fee Rezoning $5,300 + $90/acre $4,100 + $80/acre $1,500 + $50/acre Site Plan $2,000 + $90/acre $1,200 + $80/acre $600 + $50/acre Tentative Subdiv. $800 + $30/lot N/A $800 + $20/lot Final Check Subdiv. $1,100 + $20/lot N/A $500 + $20/lot The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed fee changes on February 15, 2011 and recommended approval of adjustments proposed by staff, with removal of fee 25a, a per acre charge for site plan adjustments/amendments. Staff estimates that the described fee changes would have an estimated cost in terms of unrealized revenue of between $130,000 (under current market conditions, with no fee holiday) and $200,000 (under activity levels more in line with long run averages}. 2. Utilities Department Fees. The Utilities Department's analysis of the FY2012 budget, capital replacement projects, and projections over the next ten years indicate that current revenues, without fee increases, will not be sufficient to cover operating expenses. As an enterprise fund fully supported by payments from users, fee increases are necessary to offset costs of capital projects to comply with the nutrient regulations for the Chesapeake Bay, pump station rehabilitation, new and replacement water tanks, new and replacement water lines, the county's contractual share of Richmond water plant projects, as well as maintaining the integrity of the county' s water and wastewater facilities. The proposed fee increases are also due in part to smaller growth rates in demand for water/wastewater services as well as new connections. OiD0~J33 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS i~ ;~~ Page 4 0 4 i Summary of Information (continued) The FY2012 operating budget is proposed to be 3 percent below the FY2011 adopted budget. Additional revenues are required to meet the projected longer term operating and capital costs. Even with the proposed increased fees, total revenues are expected to decrease 2 percent compared to FY2011 amounts. Utility User Fees. The proposed charges for a typical 5/8" residential size meter having an 18 CCF combined water and wastewater bi-monthly bill will increase by approximately $4.16 ($2.08 monthly). The increase is comprised of changes in both the commodity and base charges. The water commodity charge is proposed to increase by $0.08 per one hundred cubic feet (CCF) and is anticipated to generate an additional $1,353,000 in revenues. The water and wastewater bi-monthly base charges for a typical 5/8" residential size meter is proposed to increase by $2.72 and is anticipated to generate an additional $1,733,000. These increases are needed to cover the projected cost of rendering water and wastewater utility services and funding capital replacement projects and will increase a typical bi-monthly bill to $94.76. The base charges for larger meters increases proportionately based on meter size. Utility Water and Sewer Connection Fees. In addition, the department's analysis of costs for expansion projects and projections over the next ten years reflect the need to adjust the capital cost recovery charge portion of connection fees to cover capital costs. The capital cost recovery charge fees for a 5/8" residential size meter are proposed to increase the water connection fee from $4,400 to $4,795 (generating an additional $543,000) and the wastewater connection fee from $3,455 to $3,730 (generating an additional $286,000). The capital cost recovery charge fees for larger meters will increase proportionately based on meter size. Even after the proposed rate increases (assuming a typical bill for combined services), the County's rates will still be significantly less than surrounding jurisdictions. Q~~O~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.B.1. Subject: Nomination/Appointment to the Youth Services Citizen Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reques Nominate/appoint a member to serve on the Youth Services Citizen Board. Summary of Information: The purpose of the Youth Services Citizen Board is to advise the Board of Supervisors regarding planning and policies affecting youth development and to provide a community forum to focus on youth issues. Matoaca District Supervisor Durfee recommends that the Board nominate and appoint Philip Quinn, an adult, to fill the unexpired term of Shannon Rice on the Youth Services Citizen Board. His term is effective immediately and continues through June 30, 2013. Mr. Quinn meets all eligibility requirements to fill the vacancy and has indicated his willingness to serve. Under existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated. Preparers Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No Jana D. Carter Title: Director, Juvenile Services O~O~I~sS ~~~Y~E' ~ '1''+ ~~ ~ S*- ~~~? ' ~//~~((rty!yy9~~~~~. S, 'h~YF!M1~v~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: s.6.2. Subject: Appointment/Reappointment to the Airport Advisory Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Reappoint three of the five members of Airport Advisory Board (AAB) and appoint Mr. Charles E. Dane as Ex Officio Member. Summary of Information: Three of the five district representative members to the AAB terms expired on February 14, 2011. Terms are for three years, staggered amongst the AAB membership. The members seeking reappointment are Dr. James F. McClellan, Matoaca District, Mr. Richard L. Young III, Bermuda District, and Mr. John Thayer, Clover Hill District. One additional application was received from a Matoaca District resident. The staff member to be appointed as an Ex Officio Member is Mr. Charles E. Dane, Deputy Director of General Services. Board members concur with these appointments. Under the existing Rules of Procedures, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the rules of procedures are suspended by unanimous vote of the board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order that they are nominated. Preparers Robert C. Key Title: Director of General Services Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No ~~oo,~s CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~ AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.B.3. Subject: Nomination/Appointment to the Richmond Metropolitan Convention and Visitors Bureau (RMCVB) Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reques Nomination/appointment of an alternate member to serve on the RMCVB Board. Summary of Information: The purpose of the RMCVB is to serve as the lead r group for tourism and convention business in the Board has 21 members. Chesterfield has two seats is an elected official, currently Mr. Holland. Officer of Shamin Hotels, currently serves representative on the RMCVB Board. ~egional agency and advocacy Richmond area. The RMCVB on the board, one of which Mr. Neil Amin, Executive as the county's second Ms. Marilyn Cole served as an alternate member on the RMCVB Board until her retirement. Staff is requesting that the Board appoint Mr. Louis Lassiter, Assistant County Administrator, to fill Ms. Cole's unexpired term as an alternate member on the RMCVB Board. The term would be effective immediately and expire December 31, 2011. Board members concur with this appointment. Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated. Preparers Janice Blakle~ Title: Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.B.4. Sub„lect: Nomination/Appointment to the Petersburg Area Regional Tourism Corporation Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Nominate/appoint a member to serve on the Petersburg Area Regional Tourism Corporation. Summary of Information: The purpose of the Petersburg Area Regional Tourism Corporation is to develop and implement a regional tourism marketing initiative that will result in increased tourism visitation and spending. In addition, the corporation assists member localities in strategic product development planning. In accordance with the corporation's by-laws, the Board appoints two members to the PART Board of Directors, one of which is a member of the governing body, chief administrative officer or another employee of the locality and the other shall be actively affiliated with the tourism and travel industry in the jurisdiction or with a business or entity related thereto. Mr. Chris Andreano currently serves as the county's tourism-affiliated representative. Staff is requesting that the Board of Supervisors appoint Ms. Sarah Snead, Deputy County Administrator for Human Services, to serve the balance of a vacant three-year term on the Petersburg Area Regional Tourism Corporation, effective immediately and ending June 30, 2012. Board members concur with this appointment. Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated. Preparers Lou Lassiter Title: Assistant County Administrator Attachments: ^ Yes ^ NO ~3`JJ0,33 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.B.5. Subject: Appointment to the Community Criminal Justice Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested It is requested that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors approve the following appointment to the Community Criminal Justice Board (CCJB) for a two-year term according to the adopted by-laws of the Community Criminal Justice Board. Appointments correspond to prescribed positions in the Code of Virginia or as outlined in the By-Laws of the Community Criminal Justice Board. Summary of Information: The Community Criminal Justice Board (CCJB) serves the 12th Judicial Court Circuit consisting of Chesterfield County and the City of Colonial Heights. The purpose is to provide for the development, evaluation and planning of community programs and services for the court in diverting offenders from local correctional facilities. At the June 14, 1995 meeting, the Board adopted a Resolution entitled Joint Resolution Providing for the Implementation of the Comprehensive Community Corrections Act (CCCA) and the Pretrial Services Act (PSA); Establishment of the Chesterfield County and City of Colonial Heights Community Criminal Justice Board; and provisions for Joint Exercise of Powers. The resolution designated the membership by position, according to the Code of Virginia. Nominees must be approved by both the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors and the Colonial Heights City Council. Preparers Sarah C. Snead Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Deputy County Administrator NO ~3f)04~:3 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information: (Continued) It is requested the following individual be appointed to serve the remainder of a two-year term that began July 1, 2010 and ends June 30, 2012. This vacancy occurred when the Community Criminal Justice Board amended the By- laws of the Community Criminal Justice Board to require the Chesterfield Chief of Police as a member of the CCJB . Colonel Thierry G. Dupuis (Chesterfield Chief of Police) Colonel Thierry G. Dupuis, Chesterfield Chief of Police has agreed to serve in this role if appointed. Colonel Dupuis is currently serving on the Community Criminal Justice Board in the role of a Chesterfield County Citizen. By moving from an at-large citizen appointment to an appointment for the Chesterfield Chief of Police it will create a vacancy on the CCJB for an at-large citizen. The Board will be asked to make an appointment to the at- large citizen vacancy in the near future. Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to Boards and Committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated. oaoo~o ''rc''' , ~'r i~ ~~ _ ~~ ,~ 1748 ~: .:~~:.:, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.1.a. Subject: Resolution Recognizing March 12, 2011, as "Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority Youth Day" in Chesterfield County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Mr. Warren requests that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached resolution recognizing March 12, 2011, as "Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority Youth Day" in Chesterfield County. Summary of Information: Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority, Inc. is sponsoring its Fourteenth Annual Adolescent Youth Symposium simultaneously in communities across the nation on Saturday, March 12, 2011. This year's symposium will seek to help youths come to grips with peer-pressure challenges that may interfere with making healthy choices, healthy living, and a healthy generation. Preparers Janice Blakley Title: Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No dQ~p~~¢~ RECOGNIZING MARCH 12, 2011, AS "SIGMA GAMMA RHO SORORITY YOUTH DAY" IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY WHEREAS, Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority, Inc., is a 90,000-member nonprofit collegiate sorority dedicated to the encouragement and promotion of high scholastic attainment, community service, and improvement in the quality of life through its chapters, members, and affiliates located throughout the United States, Korea, Bermuda, Africa, Bahamas, Germany and the Caribbean; and WHEREAS, through its mission, Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority, Inc. seeks to address programs, projects and concerns that impact society educationally, socially, politically and economically; and WHEREAS, Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority, Inc. is sponsoring its Fourteenth Annual Adolescent Youth Symposium simultaneously in local communities across the nation on Saturday, March 12, 2011; and WHEREAS, the local members of Iota Sigma and Beta Xi Sigma Chapters of Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority, Inc., will hold their symposium on March 12, 2011 at Virginia Union University; and WHEREAS, Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority, Inc., through this year's nationwide symposium agenda, will seek to help youths come to grips with peer-pressure challenges that may interfere with making healthy choices, healthy living, and a healthy generation; and WHEREAS, Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority, Inc. has called upon the participation of a panel of community leaders to share facts regarding some of the consequences that may be faced by young people who have self-esteem and peer-pressure issues; and WHEREAS, Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority, Inc., is requesting all area junior/senior high schools, sororities/fraternities, social/civic organizations and youth services agencies to support the intent of this symposium by promoting the attendance and participation of their students and youth groups. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia recognizes March 12, 2011, as "Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority Youth Day" in Chesterfield County, thanks the members of Iota Sigma and Beta Xi Sigma Chapters of Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority, Inc. for their efforts to encourage and guide our youths, and wishes them much success with this year's symposium and all of their future endeavors. 000 E142 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meetin Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.1.b.1. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Deputy David M. Seay, Sheriff's Office, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Request Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Mr. David M. Seay retired on February 1, 2011, after more than 16 years of service to Chesterfield County. Preparers Dennis S. Proffitt Attachments: ^ yes ~ No ~b~oc~~a Title: Sheriff RECOGNIZING DEPUTY DAVID M. SEAM UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mr. David M. Seay has faithfully served Chesterfield County for more than 16 years; and WHEREAS, Mr. Seay was hired on July 5, 1994, as a deputy with the Chesterfield County Sheriff's Office; and WHEREAS, Deputy Seay transferred to the Juvenile Court Holding and Transportation Unit on February 1, 2001; and WHEREAS, Deputy Seay transferred to the Correctional Services Section in January 2003, where he shared his experience, knowledge and professionalism; and WHEREAS, Deputy Seay transferred to the Court Services Section in September 2006, where he served until his retirement; and WHEREAS, Deputy Seay received numerous letters of appreciation and several department commendations for his dedication and service to the employees and citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Deputy Seay was known for his calm demeanor with inmates, ability to defuse possible hostile situations, and his high level of motivation and commitment to excellence, while providing quality service and symbolizing the spirit of the Sheriff' s Office; and WHEREAS, Deputy Seay volunteered his time as a member of the Sheriff's Office Color Guard, positively representing both the department and Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Deputy Seay will be truly missed by his many friends and co-workers within the Sheriff's Office family. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding contributions of Deputy David M. Seay, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to Chesterfield County and extends appreciation for his dedicated service to the county and congratulations upon his retirement, as well as best wishes for a long and happy retirement. o~o~~~ ~,:.~~ ~°z.~. f I! t ~~I ~~ ~~ .y~ 1749 ' .;1!1',11!;;; CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.~1.b.2. Subject: Recognition of Firefighter Kenneth E. Aliceburg, Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Firefighter Kenneth E. Aliceburg retired from the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department on July 1, 2010, after providing more than 25 years of dedicated service to the citizens of Chesterfield County. Preparers Edward L. Senter. Jr. Title: Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No o~o~J45 Fire Chief RECOGNIZING FIREFIGHTER KENNETH E. ALICEBURG UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Firefighter Kenneth E. Aliceburg retired from the Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Chesterfield County, on July 1, 2010; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Aliceburg attended Recruit School #15 in 1984 and has faithfully served the county for more than twenty-five years in various assignments, as a firefighter at the Ettrick, Chester, Manchester and Clover Hill Fire and EMS Stations; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Aliceburg was recognized in January 2004 as an effective team member of Truck 7 for his actions during a vehicle accident resulting in tactical extrication of two patients trapped in the vehicle, which was suspended two feet off the ground and upside down against a tree on Brandermill Parkway; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Aliceburg was recognized in August 2004 as part of a two-person crew on Boat 7 for his commendable performance at a rescue, including his tactical role in the removal of trapped occupants from high water conditions in the Cloverleaf Lake apartment complex due to Tropical Storm Gaston; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Aliceburg was recognized in February 2006 as an effective team member of Truck 7 for his tactical role in extricating three trapped patients from a vehicle that rested on its side on Newby's Bridge Road following a motor vehicle accident; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Aliceburg was commended for his voluntary response to the City of Alexandria, Virginia in December 2009, and for his exemplary service while providing tactical and operational assistance to Alexandria Fire and EMS' Fire Station 203, due to their resources being overwhelmed from a massive snow storm; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Aliceburg was commended for his efforts in taking the lead on multiple emergency repairs to stations and apparatus, his mechanical knowledge, wherewithal and tremendous resource to the Fire and EMS Department, as well a's Chesterfield County, including most recently taking the lead in the construction of the garage at the Clover Hill Fire and EMS Department that houses Brush and Boat 7. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of Firefighter Kenneth E. Aliceburg, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the county, and extends their appreciation for his dedicated service and congratulations upon his retirement. (?fl0~~4S i~ f'Y}r` 'r, ~''r~) ~, { ~I~ fj+l iti _~_ ~,? by ~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.~,1.b.3. Subject: Recognition of Firefighter Stephen T. Gibson, Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reques Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Firefighter Stephen T. Gibson retired from the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department on October 1, 2010, after providing more than 25 years of dedicated service to the citizens of Chesterfield County. Preparers Edward L. Senter. Jr. Title: Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No ~~~~?~~ Fire Chief RECOGNIZING FIREFIGHTER STEPHEN T. GIBSON UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Firefighter Stephen T. Fire and Emergency Medical Services October 1, 2010; and Gibson retired from the Chesterfield Department, Chesterfield County, on WHEREAS, Firefighter Gibson attended Recruit School #16 in 1985, and has faithfully served the county for more than twenty-five years in various assignments, as a firefighter at the Wagstaff, Manchester, Clover Hill, Bensley, Midlothian, Bon Air, Courthouse Road and Winterpock Fire and EMS Stations; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Gibson was certified as an Advanced Life Support provider, a cardiac technician in 1991 and paramedic in 1993; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Gibson achieved the requirements as a firefighter specialist in 2005 and served in that capacity until his retirement; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Gibson was recognized in 1987 with an Emergency Medical Services award for saving the life of a patient who was suffering from both cardiac and respiratory arrest; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Gibson was recognized in 1988 with a Unit Citation for his actions on the scene of an accident, which involved a tractor-trailer that had jackknifed and run over a passenger vehicle causing both to catch fire ; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Gibson was recognized in 1989 with a Unit Citation for his efforts in providing emergency medical care to 20 patients who were involved in a single van accident; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Gibson was recognized in 1997 with a Unit Citation for his efforts at the scene of an apartment fire with the report of persons still inside. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of Firefighter Stephen T. Gibson, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the county, and extends their appreciation for his dedicated service and congratulations upon his retirement. Ofl0~4~ ,. ~~~ y , ~,. ;,~~ ~~~~ ~; ~~ _ ~~ ~, - ,i ixg CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meetin Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.1.b.4. Subject: Recognition of Firefighter Samuel J. Powell, III, Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requeste . Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Firefighter Samuel J. Powell, III retired from the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department on October 1, 2010, after providing 20 years of dedicated service to the citizens of Chesterfield County. Preparers Edward L. Senter, Jr. Title: Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No ~~0~~9 Fire Chief RECOGNIZING FIREFIGHTER SAMUEL J. POWELL, III FOR HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Firefighter Samuel J. Powell, III retired from the Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Chesterfield County, on October 1, 2010; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Powell attended Recruit School #22 in 1990 and has faithfully served the county for 20 years in various assignments, as a firefighter at the Chester, Clover Hill, Manchester, Bon Air, Swift Creek and Winterpock Fire and EMS Stations; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Powell served as the manager of the Chesterfield Fire and EMS' sewing shop and was an air mask repair technician; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Powell was recognized with an EMS Lifesave Award for his actions in saving the life of a woman suffering from an asthma attack in September 1999; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Powell obtained the position of firefighter specialist in November 2003; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Powell was recognized with an EMS Unit Citation and EMS Lifesave Award for his actions on the scene of an accident in January 2004, when a vehicle hit a tree trapping two passengers; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Powell was recognized with a Unit Citation for his efforts during Tropical Storm Gaston in August 2004. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes the contributions of Firefighter Samuel J. Powell, III, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the county, and extends their appreciation for his dedicated service and their congratulations upon his retirement. l?tD430:",il CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 7 O AGENDA w Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.1.b.5. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Captain Steven R. Neal, Police Department, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Captain Steven R. Neal will retire from the Police Department on March 1, 2011, after providing more than 29 years of service to the citizens of Chesterfield County. Preparers Colonel Thierry G. Dupuis Title: Chief of Police Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No #~~ ~~~~ RECOGNIZING CAPTAIN STEVEN R. NEAL UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Captain Steven R. Neal will retire from the Chesterfield County Police Department on March 1, 2011, after having provided over 29 years of quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Captain Neal has faithfully served the county in the capacity of Police Officer, Investigator, Sergeant, Lieutenant and Captain; and WHEREAS, during his tenure with the Chesterfield County Police Department, Captain Neal served diligently in the Uniform Operations Bureau, Investigations Bureau, Office of the Chief, Training Division and Support Services Bureau; and WHEREAS, Captain Neal has served in numerous assignments throughout his career to include Co-Director of the Emergency Communications Center, Watch Commander, South District Station Commander, Inspector-Office of Professional Standards, Special Response Unit Coordinator, and Academy Director; and WHEREAS, Captain Neal received a Unit Citation Award for outstanding performance of the Anti-Crime Task Force while assigned as sergeant of the team; and WHEREAS, Captain Neal created and assisted in establishing an Electronic Beat Folder system designed to categorize information by beat and then facilitate the sharing of that information via Mobile Data Computers; and WHEREAS, Captain Neal continuously displayed hard working persistence during the expansion of the Emergency Communications Center, which included the ECC shell construction, equipment specification development and development of the radio system design; and WHEREAS, Captain Neal was commended by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms for his investigative and interrogation skills that led to the confession and arrest of subjects responsible for a large warehouse fire in the City of Richmond that resulted in a loss of several hundred thousand dollars; and WHEREAS, Captain Neal assisted in the development of the Adopt-A-Cop of Virginia, which is a non-profit organization that created a partnership among car hobbyists, business leaders and officials in law enforcement who are dedicated to providing assistance to police officers in need; and WHEREAS, Captain Neal was the Police Department's first graduate of Bluefield College's off-campus program, receiving a degree in Organizational Management and Development; and WHEREAS, Captain Neal, in partnership with the University of Richmond, created, organized and managed the Public Safety University Program, which offered higher education opportunities to men and women in law enforcement, fire, and ancillary services, and more than two hundred public safety students from across the state of Virginia have received college degrees through this program; and oao~~~ WHEREAS, Captain Neal was recognized by Chesterfield County Administrator Lane B. Ramsey for his hard work and contributions in the development and success of Chesterfield University and is considered a "founding member" of the university; and WHEREAS, Captain Neal is a DCJS (Department of Criminal Justice Services) Certified Instructor and has instructed courses at academies in Virginia to include Leadership, Supervision, Ethics, Surveillance Techniques, Internal Investigations and Laws of Arrest; and WHEREAS, Captain Neal has served as a member of the Board of Directors for the Jeff Davis Association, Retail University of Virginia, Co-Executive Director of Adopt-A Cop of Virginia, and the Board of Advisors for the School of Leadership and Personal Effectiveness of Chesterfield University; and WHEREAS, Captain Neal was instrumental in the creation of the Criminal Apprehension and Suppression Team (CAST); and WHEREAS, Captain Neal is recognized for his professional attitude, communications and human relations skills, which he has utilized within the Police Department and in assisting citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Captain Neal has received numerous letters of commendation, thanks and appreciation during his career from the citizens of Chesterfield County for service rendered; and WHEREAS, Captain Neal has provided the Chesterfield County Police Department with many years of loyal and dedicated service and consistently served as an outstanding role model during his career; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss Captain Neal's diligent service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Captain Steven R. Neal, and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County appreciation for his service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. G:~(3~J~3 a.r~y{/4~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~~~,~~~ ~~ ~t, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~~ ~ _ s ~~ ~! -~ ~ ~~ AGENDA I~~ r5~..h1 .~ :,- `u:~~~<;'y: ~" Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.1.c. Subject: Resolution Supporting Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Mr. Gecker requested that the attached resolution be adopted. Summary of Information: Mr. Gecker has requested that the Board of Supervisors adopt this resolution supporting bicycle and pedestrian facilities throughout the county and a commitment and willingness to work with other localities and representatives in developing and supporting such facilities for the betterment of all. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board adopt the attached resolution. Districts: Countywide Preparers R.J.McCracken Title: Director of Transportation Agen758 Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No ~~~~~ WHEREAS, Chesterfield County is blessed with a hospitable climate, excellent topography, historic sites, and local resources; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County residents currently enjoy hiking and biking trails located in Pocahontas State Park, conservation areas, and multiple county parks; and WHEREAS, one of Chesterfield County's seven strategic goals is "to be responsible protectors of the environment"; and WHEREAS, the Committee on the Future has suggested that "Green Infrastructure" be a focal point for Chesterfield County's future planning efforts, which includes supporting development of the East Coast Greenway; and WHEREAS, bike and pedestrian facilities including trails, bikeways, paths, rails-to-trails, rails-with-trails and greenways facilitate walking, running and cycling and foster healthier lifestyles for our citizens; and WHEREAS, bike and pedestrian facilities cultivate economic development and create jobs, attract events and visitors to our county, connect communities and encourage a better and more enjoyable quality of life for all our citizens; and WHEREAS, bike and pedestrian facilities link local resources within the county together and thus increase transportation options; and WHEREAS, bike and pedestrian facilities can help curb a national epidemic of chronic obesity and weight related diseases by encouraging our adults and children to walk, run and cycle rather than travel by car; and WHEREAS, U.S. Bicycle Route 1, an on-road route which runs from Maine to Florida, follows several roads through Chesterfield County; and the East Coast Greenway, a unique, national off-road bike and walking path which will run from Maine to Florida, is under development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors expresses its support for the development of bike and pedestrian facilities including trails, bikeways, paths, rails-to-trails, rails-with- trails and greenways and actively promote a safe, viable, cycling and walking transportation network for our citizens. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Chesterfield County is committed to working with localities in the Richmond Regional and Crater Planning District Commissions and partnering with national organizations to connect these bike and pedestrian facilities with neighboring localities and with national routes thus setting an example for other counties. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Chesterfield County is committed to working with our state and congressional representatives to support legislation promoting active, human-powered transportation facilities for the betterment of our county, region, state and country. ~~'(1(D~5 ry / r~a}M1 ~, ~~`~ti y~ ~ ~~' ! ~6• r; ~ ~~ ~~, 1749 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.1.d. Subject: Resolution Recognizing March 2011 as "Purchasing Month" County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reque~d: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Purchasing associations throughout the world participate in Purchasing Month as recognition for the purchasing profession and its value to the economic conditions within all localities, states, and nations. Public purchasing requires: that ethical principles govern all conduct; a working knowledge of a wide range of goods and services; up-to-date knowledge of legalities and regulations; ability to communicate and skills to work with a diversity of users and vendors; and technical knowledge in areas such as purchasing methods, contracting, source selection, bidding, negotiation, evaluation methods, scheduling, and contract administration. It is requested that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors participate in supporting this recognition on a local basis. Preparers Michael J. Bacile Title: Director of Purchasing Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No #~~~~~~ RECOGNIZING MARCH 2011 AS "PURCHASING MONTH" WHEREAS, the purchasing and materials management profession has a significant role in the quality, efficiency and effectiveness of both business and government throughout the United States; and WHEREAS, purchasing and materials management professionals, through their combined purchasing power, spend $1.4 trillion every year and have a significant influence upon economic conditions in our community and throughout the world; and WHEREAS, in addition to the purchase of goods and services, the purchasing and materials management profession engages in or has direct responsibility for functions such as executing, implementing and administering contracts; developing forecast and procurement strategies; supervising and/or monitoring the flow and storage of materials; and developing working relations with suppliers and with other departments within the organization; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County is a leader in developing and promoting a purchasing system of equality and integrity that maximizes the value of public funds and provides fair and equitable treatment to all persons involved in public purchasing; and WHEREAS, governmental purchasing and other associations around the world are sponsoring activities and special events to further educate and inform the general public on the role of purchasing within business, industry and government. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes the month of March 2011 as "Purchasing Month" in Chesterfield County and encourages all citizens to join in commemorating this observance. t3~0~~7 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~' - AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.1.e. Sub'ect: Resolution Supporting Competitive Air Fares in the Richmond Region County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Mr. Warren is requesting that the Board adopt the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Low-cost air carriers have had a positive economic impact on the Richmond region. The Greater Richmond Chamber has launched the Save Low Fares campaign to ensure that airline competition remains in Richmond. Preparers Lou Lassiter Title: Assistant County Administrator Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No #l)~0~58 SUPPORTING COMPETITIVE AIR FARES IN THE RICHMOND REGION WHEREAS, since coming to the Richmond region, low-cost air carriers have provided a significant positive economic impact on our community and have been responsible for more than a 40 percent reduction in airfares during the past five years; and WHEREAS, RIC, formally one of the more expensive airports in the country, is now considered to be an airport with competitively- priced airfares, and this has been vital to creating an economic climate of success as the region competes on the national and world stages to attract new business and investment; and WHEREAS, according to the Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce, an economic impact study conservatively estimates that these low cost carriers are saving the Richmond region's residents roughly $80 million per year in ticket costs; and WHEREAS, a large portion of those savings, plus a boost in passenger traffic as a result of more affordable fares, have significantly increased spending in the region, estimated at $50 million which benefits the area's businesses and positively affects employment opportunities and the overall economy; and WHEREAS, it is important that Richmond travelers continue to support these low-cost carriers, so that competitive air fares can remain in Richmond; and WHEREAS, on December 1, 2010, the Greater Richmond Chamber launched the Save Low Fares campaign to ensure airline competition remains in Richmond, and the campaign urges travelers to fly these low-cost airlines. WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors would like to express the county's support for the Richmond region's low- cost air carriers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors supports the Richmond region's low-cost air carriers, recognizing that they have made significant economic contributions to the Richmond region. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board supports the Greater Richmond Chamber's Save Low Fares campaign. ~~00~9 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.2. Subject: Set Date for Public Hearing to Consider Amending Chapter 10, Fire Protection, of the County Code County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Req~ie~ted: Set the date of April 13, 2011 to conduct a public hearing to consider adopting the attached ordinance amending Chapter 10, Fire Protection, of the County Code. Summary of Information: Recently, the State Department of Housing and Community Development promulgated changes to the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code (VSFPC), which will become effective March 1, 2011. Accordingly, the county needs to update its amendments to the VSFPC to reflect the changes, which have been made by the state. The attached proposed ordinance makes those changes. Additionally, there are a number of structural changes for clarity of enforcement of the open burning regulations. There is also a change to the requirements for placarding vacant buildings, which are dangerous to firefighting operations, to provide consistency with the fire department' s needs. There is also an addition to the open burning exemptions to allow the destruction of certain types of evidence by the Police Department. Lastly, anew provision was added to coordinate the requirements to obtain building permits from building inspections for work above and beyond ordinary repairs. Preparers Edward L. Senter Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Fire Chief ^ No #O~t3~~r7 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 10-3 AND 10-4 RELATING TO THE FIRE CODE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 10-3 and 10-4 of the Code o the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 10-3. Fire prevention code--Amendments, additions and deletions. The Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code is hereby amended and changed pursuant to Code of Virginia, § 27-97, in the following respects: 000 Chapter 3. General Precautions Against Fire 307.2 Open Burning Regulations-General. Delete and substitute Section 307.2 as follows: 000 G. Permitted fires shall be constantly attended by a competent person until they are extinguished. The attendee shall have fire extinguishing equipment readily available for use as deemed necessary by the code official. .. ~:H. Upon declaration of an alert, .. . ~I. The fire marshal or his designee .. . 307.2.1 Exemptions. Delete and substitute subsection 307.2.1 as follows: 000 F. Open burning for the disposal of evidence under the direction of the Vir inia State Police, Chesterfield County Police or the Fire Marshal. 307.2.2 Permissible Open Burning. Add subsection 307.2.2 as follows: A. Open burning is permitted for the disposal of tree trimmings and garden trimmings located on the premises of private property, provided that the following conditions are met: 000 o~o~s~ 2723:85530.1 . f pm r~r~~ ~~~ ~~-n nn~n n~~n»~ ~6. No regularly scheduled public or private collection service .. . ~7. Permits for burning tree trimmings and/or garden trimmings .. . 000 B. Open burning is permitted for disposal of debris waste resulting from property maintenance, from the development or modification of roads and highways, parking areas, railroad tracks, pipelines, power and communication lines, buildings or building areas, sanitary landfills, or from any other designated local clearing operations which may be approved by Chesterfield Fire & EMS, Fire and Life Safety Division, provided the following conditions are met: 000 . .. . ~:7. The burning shall not be allowed to smolder .. . ~:8. The burning shall be conducted only when .. . ~-~:9. The permit holder must maintain liability insurance .. . 000 C. Open burning is permitted for disposal of debris on the site of local landfills provided that the burning does not take place on land that has been filled and covered so as to present an underground fire hazard due to the presence of methane gas, provided that the following conditions are met: 000 . .. . . 43. The material to be burned shall consist only of .. . o~ac~~~ 2723:85530.1 ~4. All reasonable effort shall be made to minimize .. . ~:5. The location of the burning shall be a minimum of .. . ~:6. No materials may be burned in violation of the regulations .. . ~7. The permit holder must maintain liability insurance .. . 000 000 307.2.6 Revocation of Permits. Add subsection 307.2.6: A. If any permit holder violates any provision of this ordinance or if any permit holder makes a material misrepresentation on apermit application, The Fire Marshal may require the extinguishments ofthe fire and the burn permit shall be subj ect to revocation; B. Permits maybe revoked or suspended when smoke, ash or other hazards create a public health or safet concern. 000 311.5 Placards. Delete and substitute section 311.5 as follows: Any building or structure that is vacant or abandoned and is determined by the fire official to be unduly dangerous to firefi htin~ operations due to structural or interior hazards shall be marked as required by Sections 311.5 through 311.5.5 or marked as required by the code official. 000 Chapter 9 Fire Protection Systems 901.10 Permits Required. All modifications, additions, or repair work beyond the scope of routine maintenance and inspections require permits issued by the Building Official in accordance with the Uniform Statewide Building Code• o~~~~~ 2723:85530.1 000 Sec. 10-4. Same--Modifications. The chief of the fire department or the "fire c--ede official" shall have the authority to modify any of the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code, as herein amended, upon application in writing by an owner or lessee, or his duly authorized agent, if the chief or fire sere official finds there are practical difficulties in carrying out the strict letter of the code. The chief or fire sere official shall make no modifications unless the spirit of the code is observed, public safety is secured, and substantial justice is done. The particulars of such modification when granted or allowed and the decision of the chief of the fire department or fire cede official thereon shall be entered upon the records of the department and a signed copy shall be furnished to the applicant. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. ~~~~~ 2723:85530.1 4 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGEND Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.3. Subject: Appropriation of Funds, Various Authorizations and Award of a Construction Contract for the Route 1/Willis Road Turn Lane Construction Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Req~e~ted: The Board is requested to 1)appropriate $460,904 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements; 2)authorize the County Administrator to enter into a Route 1/Willis Road Turn Lane Construction Agreement with the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT); 3)authorize staff to acquire necessary right-of- way and authorize the advertisement of an eminent domain public hearing, if necessary; 4)authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator to execute easement agreements for the relocation of utilities; and 5)authorize the County Administrator to award a construction contract up to $1.1 million to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Summary of Information: In April 2010, the Board provided southbound left turn lane on Route 1 The intersection has a high number of the intersection safer. The Board matching revenue sharing funds for th that it will only provide $460,904 i appropriation of the anticipated VDOT (Continued on next page) Preparer: R.J.McCracken $934,700 for the construction of a at its intersection with Willis Road. accidents. A lef t turn lane will make requested VDOT to provide equivalent e project. VDOT has advised the county n matching funds; staff recommends the funds . Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director of Transportation Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director, Budget and Management N~ C)`JO~Jgs5 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information: (continued) In order to move the project forward, VDOT has agreed to allow the county to manage the project as a county permit project. Staff is requesting the Board's authorization for the County Administrator to enter into a VDOT / County project management agreement, acceptable to the County Attorney. A draft agreement is attached. The terms of the agreement provide for the county management of the project with reimbursements from VDOT. At this time, staff believes the project can be constructed in existing right-of-way. However, staff requests the Board's authorization to proceed with the acquisition of additional right-of-way and to advertise an eminent domain public hearing, if necessary. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board: 1. Appropriate $460,904 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements for the project; 2. Authorize the County Administrator to enter into a VDOT/County Project Agreement; 3. Authorize staff to acquire additional right-of-way, if needed, for the project and advertise an eminent domain public hearing, if necessary; 4. Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator to execute easement agreements for relocation of utilities; and 5. Award a construction contract, up to $1.1 million, to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. District: Bermuda o~o~~s Route 1 / Willis Road Turn Lane Project PROJECT REVENUE DATE AMOUNT SOURCE 4/28/10 $ 934,700 $500,000 Chesterfield Road Fund, $434,700 Industrial Access Account 2/23/11 Pro osed $460,904 Antici ated VDOT Reimbursements TOTAL $1,395,604 PROJECT ESTIMATE Preliminary Engineerin $ 60,000 Ri ht-of Way $ 10,000 Utility Relocation $ 50,000 Construction En ineerin $ 35,000 Construction $1,040,604 Construction Contin ency $ 200,000 Miti ation $ 0 Total $1,395,604 o~ov~~ OAG Approved 5/24/2010 STANDARD PROJECT ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT State-aid Projects Pro'ect Number UPC Local Government 0001-020-R18 98234 Chesterfield County THIS AGREEMENT, made and executed in triplicate this day of , 20_, by and between the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, hereinafter referred to as the LOCALITY and the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the DEPARTMENT. WHEREAS, the LOCALITY has expressed its desire to administer the work described in Appendix A, and such work for each improvement shown is hereinafter referred to as the Project; and WHEREAS, the funds shown in Appendix A have been allocated to finance the Project(s) and the funding currently allocated or proposed for the project(s) does not include Federal-aid Highway funds; and WHEREAS, both parties have concurred in the LOCALITY's administration of the phase(s) of work for the respective Project(s) listed in Appendix A in accordance with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual premises contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The LOCALITY shall: a. Be responsible for all activities necessary to complete the noted phase(s) of each Project shown in Appendix A, except for activities, decisions, and approvals which are the responsibility of the DEPARTMENT, as required by federal or state laws and regulations or as otherwise agreed to, in writing, between the parties. b. Receive prior written authorization from the DEPARTMENT to proceed with the project. c. Administer the project(s) in accordance with guidelines applicable to Locally Administered Projects as published by the DEPARTMENT. d. Provide certification by a LOCALITY official of compliance with applicable laws and regulations on the State Certification Form for State Funded Projects or in another manner as prescribed by the DEPARTMENT. e. Maintain accurate and complete records of each Project's development of all expenditures and make such information available for inspection or auditing by the DEPARTMENT. Records and documentation for items for which reimbursement will be requested shall be maintained for not less than three (3) years following acceptance of the final voucher on each Project. oaan~~ OAG Approved 5/2412010 4 County of Chesterfield UPC 98234 f. No more frequently than monthly, submit invoices with supporting documentation to the DEPARTMENT in the form prescribed by the DEPARTMENT. The supporting documentation shall include copies of related vendor invoices paid by the LOCALITY and also include an up-to-date project summary and schedule tracking payment requests and adjustments. g. Reimburse the DEPARTMENT all Project expenses incurred by the DEPARTMENT if due to action or inaction solely by the LOCALITY the project becomes ineligible for state reimbursement, or in the event the reimbursement provisions of Section 33.1-44 or Section 33.1- 70.01 of the Code of Virginia,1950, as amended, or other applicable provisions of state law or regulations require such reimbursement. h. On Projects that the LOCALITY is providing the required match to state funds, pay the DEPARTMENT the LOCALITY's match for eligible Project expenses incurred by the DEPARTMENT in the performance of activities set forth in paragraph 2.a. i. Administer the Proj ect in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Failure to fulfill legal obligations associated with the project may result in forfeiture of state-aid reimbursements j . If legal services other than that provided by staff counsel are required in connection with condemnation proceedings associated with the acquisition ofRight-of Way, the LOCALITY will consult the DEPARTMENT to obtain an attorney from the list of outside counsel approved by the Office of the Attorney General. Costs associated with outside counsel services shall be reimbursable expenses of the Project. k. For Projects on facilities not maintained by the DEPARTMENT, provide, or have others provide, maintenance of the Project upon completion, unless otherwise agreed to by the DEPARTMENT. 2. The DEPARTMENT shall: a. Perform any actions and provide any decisions and approvals which are the responsibility of the DEPARTMENT, as required by federal or state laws and regulations or as otherwise agreed to, in writing, between the parties. b. Upon receipt of the LOCALITY'S invoices pursuant to paragraph l.f, reimburse the LOCALITY the cost of eligible Project expenses, as described in Appendix A. Such reimbursements shall be payable by the DEPARTMENT within 3 0 days of an acceptable submission by the LOCALITY. c. If appropriate, submit invoices to the LOCALITY for the LOCALITY'S share of eligible project expenses incurred by the DEPARTMENT in the performance of activities pursuant to paragraph 2.a. d. Audit the LOCALITY's Project records and documentation as may be required to verify LOCALITY compliance with applicable laws and regulations. ~~~~ OAG Approved 512412010 5 County of Chesterfield UPC 98234 e. Make available to the LOCALITY guidelines to assist the parties in carrying out responsibilities under this Agreement. 3. Appendix A identifies the funding sources for the project, phases of work to be administered by the LOCALITY, and additional project-specific requirements agreed to by the parties. There may be additional elements that, once identified, shall be addressed by the parties hereto in writing, which may require an amendment to this Agreement. 4. If designated by the DEPARTMENT, the LOCALITY is authorized to act as the DEPARTMENT's agent for the purpose of conducting survey work pursuant to Section 33.1-94 of the Code of Virginia,1950, as amended. 5. Nothing in this Agreement shall obligate the parties hereto to expend or provide any funds in excess of funds agreed upon in this Agreement or as shall have been included in an annual or other lawful appropriation. In the event the cost of a Project is anticipated to exceed the allocation shown for such respective Project on Appendix A, both parties agree to cooperate in providing additional funding for the Proj ect or to terminate the Proj ect before its cost exceeds the allocated amount, however the DEPARTMENT and the LOCALITY shall not be obligated to provide additional funds beyond those appropriated pursuant to an annual or other lawful appropriation. 6. Nothing in this agreement shall be construed as a waiver of the LOCALITY's or the Commonwealth of Virginia's sovereign immunity. 7. This agreement may be terminated by either party upon 30 days advance written notice. Eligible Project expenses incurred through the date of termination shall be reimbursed in accordance with paragraphs l.f, l.g, and 2.b, subject to the limitations established in this Agreement and Appendix A. Upon termination and unless otherwise agreed to, the DEPARTMENT shall retain ownership of plans, specifications, and right of way for which state funds have been provided, unless all state funds provided for the Project have been reimbursed to the DEPARTMENT by the LOCALITY, in which case the LOCALITY will have ownership of the plans, specifications, and right of way. THE LOCALITY and DEPARTMENT acknowledge and agree that this Agreement has been prepared j ointly by the parties and shall be construed simply and in accordance with its fair meaning and not strictly for or against any party. THE LOCALITY and the DEPARTMENT further agree that should Federal-aid Highway funds be added to the project, this agreement is no longer applicable and shall be terminated. The LOCALITY and the DEPARTMENT mutually agree that they shall then enter into a Standard Proj ect Administration Agreement for Federal-aid Projects. THIS AGREEMENT, when properly executed, shall be binding upon both parties, their successors, an assigns. THIS AGREEMENT may be modified in writing by mutual agreement of both parties. ~~~`~~ OAG Approved 5/2412010 6 County of Chesterfield UPC 98234 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party hereto has caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day, month, and year first herein written. COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA: Typed or printed name of signatory Title Date Signature of Witness Date NOTE: The official signing for the LOCALITY must attach a certified copy of his or her authority to execute this agreement. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION: Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner Date Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Transportation Signature of Witness Date Attachment Appendix A-1-UPC 98234 OY3fl~J'71 OAG Approved 5/24/2010 7 County of Chesterfield UPC 98234 Project Number:0001-020-R18 UPC 98234 Locality: Chesterfield County Project Narrative Scope: Construct left turn lanes From: Route 1 at Willis Road To: Locality Project Manager Contact lnfo: Stan Newcomb Department Project Coordinator Contact Info: Clayton Thomas Project Costs and Reimbursement Phase Estimated Project Costs Estimated Eligible Project Costs Estimated Eligible vnOT Project Expenses Estimated Reimbursement to Locality Preliminary Engineering $2,100 $2,100 $2,100 $0 Right-of Way & Utilities $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $859,514 $859,514 $4,000 $424,707 Total Estimated Cost $861,614 $861,614 $6,100 $424,707 Total Maximum Reimbursement by Locality to VDOT $0 Total Maximum Reimbursement by VDOT to Locality $460,904 Project Financing A B C D Revenue Sharing State Matchin Funds g Revenue Sharing Local Matchin Funds g Locali Funds 100% ~ @ Aggregate Allocations (A+B+C) $430,807 $430,807 $0 $861,614 Program and Project Specific Funding Requirements • This project shall be administered in accordance with VDOT's Locally Administered Projects Manual. • This project is a Revenue Sharing project and must follow the procedures set forth in the Guide to the Revenue Sharing Program. • This is a limited fund source project. All costs exceeding available Revenue Sharing Funds will be borne 100% by the locality. • Estimated eligible VDOT expenses are based on VDOT processing SERP (if applicable) and inspection. Any additional assistance necessary may result in additional VDOT charges to the project. • VDOT will reimburse locality 50% of eligible costs up to Maximum Reimbursement Amount, less any VDOT expenditures. • In accordance with §33.1-23.05 of the Code of Virginia, this project must be initiated and at least a portion of funds expended by September 14, 2013 or the project may besubject to de-allocation. • Revenue Sharing Funds above consist of the following Fiscal Years: o FY11 Funds - $861,614 $430,807 Localit & $430,807 VDOT This attachment is certified and made an official attachment to this document by the parties of this agreement Authorized Locality Official and date _ Typed or printed name of person signing OAG Approved 5/24/2010 8 Authorized VDOT Official Recommendation and date Typed or printed name of person signing 04072 County of Chesterfield UPC 98234 ROUTE 1 / WILLIS ROAD LEFT TURN LANE PROJECT O~D00'73 OAG Approved 5/24!2010 ~~~~~:~~ ,~ y /~~~. A~~' ..,;I ~'Y~ ~~ v tf. ~r -' JI ~ 4 ~fl i~;' ,k , - ~ ~ y, r.~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.4. Subject: Approval of Design, Various Authorizations and Award of a Construction Contract for the Walton Park Sidewalk 2 Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reques The Board is requested to take the following actions for the Walton Park Sidewalk 2 Project: 1)approve the design; 2)authorize staff to proceed with right-of-way acquisition, including the advertisement of an eminent domain public hearing, if necessary; 3)authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator to execute easement agreements for relocation of utilities; 4)authorize the County Administrator to enter into the customary VDOT and environmental permits/mitigation agreements; and 5) authorize the award of a construction contract, up to $900,000, to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Summary of Information: In 2004, voters overwhelmingly approved a $40 million bond referendum for highway improvements. The county designated $2 million of the referendum for sidewalk improvements. (Continued on next page) Preparer: R.J.McCracken Agen759 Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Attachments: Yes Title: Director of Transportation Title: Director, Budget and Managem~ent_ tJo # Q~0~74 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA Summary of Information: (Continued) When the referendum was approved, it was understood sidewalk would be constructed in the Walton Park subdivision area. Construction plans for installing sidewalk along the west side of Walton Park Road, from Watch Hill Road to Woolridge Road, are substantially complete and are available for review in the Transportation Department. Right-of-way needs to be acquired from twenty one parcels. Staff continues to make minor design revisions to reduce the impacts on the owners. No residents will be relocated. Staff met with seventeen of the parcel owners during the plan development and discussed the impacts of the project. The property owners are supportive of the project. Staff called or mailed notices to the owners we were unable to meet. Staff also sent brief project status reports to Walton Park Community Association representatives. As a result of the owner meetings, staff concluded the customary formal citizen information meeting was unnecessary. A letter has been sent to each landowner and the community association board advising them that Board approval of the design was being requested at this Board meeting. If the Board authorizes staff to proceed with the right-of-way acquisition, we will attempt to negotiate settlements. If settlements cannot be reached, staff requests authorization to advertise a public hearing for eminent domain proceedings. Right-of-way acquisition and utility relocations will begin immediately upon authorization. Staff is also requesting authorization to advertise and award a construction contract, up to $900,000, to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Construction is expected to begin in the summer of 2011, dependent upon utility relocations. The project is expected to take six months to complete. The project budget is attached. ~;~i3~ i5 i CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 3 AGENDA Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board: 1. Approve the design of the Walton Park Sidewalk 2 Project; 2. Authorize staff to acquire right-of-way for the project, including advertisement of an eminent domain public hearing, if necessary; 3. Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator to execute easement agreements for relocation of utilities; 4. Authorize the County Administrator to enter into customary VDOT and environmental permit/mitigation agreements; and 5. Authorize award of a construction contract, up to $900,000, to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, funds are appropriated and available to award. District: Midlothian o~oo~s Walton Park Sidewalk 2 Project PROJECT REVENUE AMOUNT SOURCE $2,000,000 2004 Bond Referendum PROJECT ESTIMATE Preliminary En ineering $ 148,000 Ri ht-of Way $ 154,000 Utility Relocation $ 243,000 Construction En ineerin $ 216,000 Construction $ 803,000 Construction Contin ency $ 160,000 Miti anon $ 0 Total $1,724,000 oc~~~~~ PRELIMINARY PROPERTY ACQUISITION (SUBJECT TO CHANGE) Property Owner Fee Right-of-way acres Permanent Easements s ware feet Temporary Easements s uare feet Overbey 298 453 Davis 80 183 Canada 39 256 Staton 34 89 Sims 235 Gardner 392 White 210 Goin 35 283 Mason 266 Pu h 210 Rutledge 552 Turner 3 O 1 Melroy 0.002 176 623 County Chesterfield 0.060 173 556 Morris 0.073 819 Jones 0.011 836 Jones 0.002 13 8 Jones 0.005 3139 Duncan 254 Stevens 146 Madison 112 WALTON PARK SIDEWALK PROJECT Lam, ~"-4--...Ifs" Ili I y .y (r •~....~ ~,} ~ . ~ ~f ~~"~, '-~~~' ~ ~``"~ ~~ ,' ......y IIy w tai ,~ . ~y,\ ~ ,~ `~'. ,, '1 i ~~ ,~, :- ,~ .° ~ ~ ~,_ by ,, , I~ I _ _ ,- - --,ti ~"~, I ~C"^ ~+ I e ,. ~ ( f 1 ~i ~i i S ~ ~~~ f "',~, I ~~ E I . ! + jjI 3 1' D ~ .r..-_ ( . ,.,~.. -----_ ~ 1 i ~t ( I _~ i !I i ~, ~ ~ t , _L--;.~ it ,I ~ ,p `s.---" 11 I I '~ ~I ~ ~~''~ 4 --'~ ~ ,! E ~•, ~ ~•-i '. i ~ li--.~• I S i '~ Its _ i -''".___...__~,,. --~ w~l ~'r ~f"~•~~ I Lam" r f _..1 ~,. ~:~.'~. K~"``'``''r'-~ ;' -,r-_ ~ ;'~' ~` ~,F'PR~~IMATE LO~ATI~N ~F ~~ M~ ~ ~ _ ~ `i, ~' i~ .,~~..~-~- r PR ~OPO QED SID E1I~~L1 4 -..ti, I +~ ~ 4 _,~r-~ ..r+',,. I 5 !f 1 ~~~ I 1 ~,..~ ~ ;°a .r i ~ ~ i _ ..._ ~ r i 4 !~' ' tit J" y t ), •'~' ...Y ."" ~ a...........,.Y" ~ • ,r ~'I r.....,...,,,..dw F . r I _._~ ^ ~ ~ ', , _ ' ''•`J'! 1) a+ t, i 1 ,l . ,y, °'."" /,r. W» ~- '4 J rf^ J ~ ~) I ~, + I~`^~."1^t 4~ ~ -~ ~, ~~~f ^ '~~~ ,i.,r ~r-~*,._~^V •~ ~~ fl ' iM..•,^ ~•^ "~V~ ~ ;k `7r ', C 1 . .S'~•' ., ''1~'~ I'".~• i b.•._ f W_1 I~,.,~ d ~~~•.~~r r•'`-•~~, ~,~,,,..r } ...1.„,,,,jc ~~~ t !}T ~ :'- t ' 1 _~ ! ~ ' I~E(~I ~ Ir •~V'.a4`` ~ 'twy,,}_...i ~`"'~" II .T ~ ".`f: ^ , 1.'.L`,~ """~ ~' ~ f r - " F k"""' J "?,~ ~~LLrr r ~^ _ i. I .sa.i p~, ~~ ''~I "1 I ~ I ~~ ~~..... ~ I I~~...rf yi ' P°-~..,~~ ~'~ 1' ~^A n. + _..~~'~^-~'"•~~'"•• ^..~ .. 1 ~ . I ., r Ix~" I " 'h. i1 ~•...,J f rJ. 1 f ~ (•-»~ "~ ~ ~ '~ e f M1 I s.r'~ 4 'y ;},~ y I~ I ~ ~ ,', 5~--~'! , '. I`,I f~~-'"I 1 ...t... 1_.~~ "'j~ t ~.: y ti :Ir~ _ "~"~^~+S- `.•, .• . ( "'! I ~.,I +' . I t J j ~......'`~ ~1+ r'•t."r 1 ..r~r -"~~'yr+l rI.`a',~F..'-`~ r '1 I.a.. 1 w ~ t+, a , ~ ~ r ..i,- ,.,~ .."~ '~ )~ }~ •If+ ~±r .,r ,art ~~~ s.M" ; . ~ r ~ • ~~ I ~ ~ '~-'"' +, ,,.~ °}~a, '`-~, ~ ! 14 7 `ft ~p ~ I~ I~ '°,; _ ~, ; ~S IS s y I~ '~ !f i ~S I ~ ,_,~,_~I ^ ~ r + / • ~ "" t •r! j, ~ ~ `~(,, I J~"'f'''' ~ ~ 9 ~'• r~' 1} r~''' i ~ 7 .l,... / ,-~.... ~~ }~~.. I ~.xS (~ I ~I r µl ~~ It ~^,'; ~..'' / 11 f ' L ~ '` ••wrr+"• '~'~,^` ~•w4 _.-I'"a-+'If 1~, `~ ~ L._ -~-+) 1 __ V r _-+~ ~ i a„„,"'I~"""' 1 r 1.` t •~. T" i ~ o J ! I _.~~ i r ~`" ~__~ ti w f y '~ ;~ I,y ~~~ ~• ~ , f ~ '-1M-,~ -, ' t r` -+'°` ' ~:a'r f ~ ~^ ~ r.._ ~ , ~ ' __ i .. ~`'"^`~ II, r . ~1 rl '^' :t ,, '•`.;' ` ,• ~ ._-1 r (rr,,..•t r ,~s ~ -- ~t ~'~ ~ , ~ "~',, •- ~ {'fir "-~'"'7" _ .'.~ ~ r ~ ~ '.y-r'" f 4 '~ _'' ..,r t "7~ t ^ ~, +ti •.,+~. ~.-. S6 - '','.l'N»`^' ' M,I ~-~---~••~ w, ~~ f ~ ~'"_ ~ I I S ~ I t ~`'» r; •.M1'~1+ ' ~ ' + of _ ` ~.r• i ~ r`Vli ~ '', _r"~~,! 1, •i~y~~r~ ~ 1 E '~ '4'a....•~.'"r J"''~ '~~" "'I~kl.-'1~.... ' + ~~--»» .,. ~" n d j~ i ^^'.'ar ~,• '~-'r, iV If+'~/ ry.,. -I a. ~.r- --•--v, J"~ `~~ ...r-T~ I ~J•TKd.._ ~~,,,yd ;- _ ,; _ r "- " - f 4 „" I~ i y .1't , t ~t,'r'"''~ '' ,t ~~ `~,"" '~~ ,•';~ ",_ 1"°'".~...~•-~ ~_._.~~^.. ,~~5 _"'~t t^~. ,» .. .IT t~ '• • ` • ., .I . 1 ti a' -"~. . _ ., .~ :, '• ', -~_ c tip,. ~.~ ~ ;- ~ ~.~~, ~ ~, ~.~ ~~ ~I r' :~~"`~-,~~ I , ~1'~1 r -~' , l ,~ .. i I ~ ~ ~(""" ,; /. y 9 ...~y" I ~ ~ >~,~ y ~ , ,i„ R f ~ 9 ° 'w,~;. '~ ( S° k t- ~ ~M~ I ~ ~," ; f ~-f't ~F' f 7 „ `~' ~ ^ .._'1 .. ( ~ ..,G ~•-~ ~' ''+ "' '^.yw ~ N '' I { I `, ,,.L ' ., I t ., ~ # ~ -;.,,•'~. "~~ W'~•. li ~ kw ` `^,.. ~ ~, y' i ~a_ "° Nr-. S' w i °~,_..~~ °~.,"~"'"' •' ; ~..T •'i dam"' is ~ 'V~~ i' I~ 1 ••~,_" -.~i"* ~ ~' , y ~~ d ~..~.,.,~..,•~ ~..,.~.~ I r'uy~" ~ I '~--~ ~ I "'•~'"Y_d~ ,~ ~..^r ...~_, ~ ''' ...I.../"' i •~", • °. _ .,, ~, 1' _ ,_~ , ~~„ey li +~ ~.'~~,'.t ', J..-,~`~ '` ~ .^+., ' ~~-~,~.w... .1. ~?-~4T'_"-`....,,, ~ { ~ <' k ~3 }'''"•~ ~ a ° S'~,~ . ~kJ . ~ 6 +h - a~ .' '.: i _, .. ~~ I ~~~ o~o~~~ +~~ ~~ .~, ~ ~<~ ~~; - ~~~ ~ r; ,~' ~.~i~!> ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.5. Subject: Authorization of Change Order for Construction of the Route 10 (I-95 to Ware Bottom Spring Road) Widening Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Request The Board is requested to authorize change order, up to $ 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 , for th Road) Widening Project. Summary of Information: the County Administrator to execute a e Route 10 (I-95 to Ware Bottom Spring In January 2010, the Board authorized the County Administrator to award a construction contract for the Route 10 (I-95 to Ware Bottom Spring Road) Widening Project. The County is managing the construction of the project under the customary VDOT/County agreement wherein the county performs the work and is reimbursed by VDOT. Construction is well underway. Unsuitable soil material and underground springs have been encountered at Skunk Hollow. A change order for remedial earth work is required to properly address the issue in order to construct the road. (Continued on next page) Preparer: R.J.McCracken Agen759 Title: Director, Budget and Management Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No ~~aa8~ Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director of Transportation CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information: continued The remedial earth work plan has been designed and approved by VDOT and FHWA. The cost of the repairs is estimated at $235,202.44, based upon unit prices in the contract for remedial earth work. The actual cost will be determined once all work has been completed. VDOT and FHWA have approved the additional cost for reimbursement to the county. In accordance with county policy, a change order over $50,000 needs to be approved by the Board. Sufficient funds remain in the project contingency to cover the increase in the project cost. No additional county funds will be required. Recommendation: Staff is requesting that the Board authorize the County Administrator to execute a change order, up to $250,000, for the Route 10 (I-95 to Ware Bottom Spring Road) Project for remedial earth work at Skunk Hollow, which is approximately six percent greater than the estimate to allow for additional remedial earth work, should it become necessary. District: Bermuda (Jf~~~~l Route 10 (I-95 to Ware Bottom Spring Road) Widening Project 1-9 ~ Hundred Fed SKUNK H+ULLi~W wtirw~mA~pl~tk la:Fart: hdiawapenaamap X31-~~ Feet 0 36~ X00 1,460 ~ ,190 ~ ,9~0 ~f?Oa~82 ~, %i ~~1^ ! ~~) ~ ~~ ww~ ~~~ ~, .,±~~..s CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.6. Subject: State Road Acceptances County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of resolutions for referenced state road acceptances. Summary of Information: Bermuda District: Clover Hill District: Dale District: Midlothian District: Harrowgate Meadows Section 1 Bermuda School Off-site Windy Creek Section E Kingsland Glen Section 4 Amended Kingsland Glen Section 5 Stone Harbor Section 1 Preparers Richard M McElfish Title: Director, Environmental Engineering Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No #~~~~ ~3 T0: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - HARROWGATE MEADOWS SECTION 1 DISTRICT: BERMUDA MEETING DATE: February 23, 2411 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: COUGAR TRL HARRMEADOW LN PARKGATE DR Vicinity Map: HARROWGATE MEADOWS SECTION 1 ~pUls~~ HARROW DR GP~VINGP~~ DER ~~tN1EADOW L ~P O G G1 r -o 4• 1 ~~ m ~z -o v HARROW DR Z 5~ ~O ~~j SY Lv PSI Z ~~~0 N~~~ ~z G~ ~~ m ~ ~a 0 ~~ ~G ~~ \.~ LANr "" ~, Q- d~5 P~ O~'~ C n Q ~ ~v ~r~- ~~ 00 ~ cn ~0 D ~~ ~~ P~~ ~ ~ Z ~ 00 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ 2 ! ~~ ~G~ ~ ~ J ~~ ~ ~ P ~ 5~0 ~ ~~ a G~ '~ p y ~0 ~,~ G~ ~~ ~d ~ ~ '~~ G ~` p0 -~ ~~N 'A ,~ ~ DO ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~0 ~ p ~~ ~~' R sol ~G ' ~ NE ~~ O~ 5 Produced By Chesterfield County GIS QJ~Oa4 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance -BERMUDA SCHOOL OFF-SITE (Beginners Trail Ln) DISTRICT: BERMUDA MEETING DATE: February 23, 2011 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: BEGINNERS TRAIL LN BAPTIST DR Vicinity Map: BERMUDA SCHQOLOFF-SITE OC V `' ~ W ~- ~ ~Q a n REEN ~a 7~ Q' RCHARD ~~ ~ ~ ~ v ~R ~~~vG Z ~F,q'cA TF~ T 9,p ~'N 7 O O REYLE~ 00 0 z 0 KOYOTO C ~ ORCHARD ~ HARVEST D ~ p O ~ O 70 = w ~ D ~ D o ~ Q i ~r ~ _ ~ 0 ~- ~_ a a m ~ e~G'~~eR ~ TRP~~'i o 0 ~ WELLSHIRE PL z J J 0 ROT = HSCH1Lp p __ R MAR T jN~ ~ ~~~R ~ ~ w ~~ ~°~ n y P~ MO~Nr e~ s~ 0 Copp ~/iQ Produced By Chesterfield County GIS OJO~J~S T0: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance -WINDY CREEK SECTION E DISTRICT: CLOVER HILL MEETING DATE: February 23, 2411 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: STONE CREEK DR SUNNY CREEK DR Vicinity Map: WINDY CREEK SECTION E ~~ NEWgYS ~~' cT P~ 1M~~ pR E~PN S~~"L ~,~~ ~~5 pR L~1~PN ~~ 5~ ~~ ~ m G~ ,~ ~ 0 .~ Q CT N 0 ~ c~ w ~0 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~~ ~` ~ ~ Q 3 4 ~ MAN ~ ~ ~~ G ~',~ ~ Ly 0 ~ ~ ~ Z J ~ ~ 0~4 ~ ~L r '~o ~~- 0 ~~. ENO '~ ~o ,~ ~ N<< OC w ~ MA ~,\~ ~ RAs o T ~' '~~ F~ ~E ~ ~ ~ G~ G ~ . 2 o ~' c ~ ,~ o ~0 C,gN ~ ~ r~ RIDGE R N Na ~ ~ Z ~ n ~ ~-~ R OR ~ o ~~ ~ ,~ = ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~G ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~i a m m ~ TON 0 ~ INq 1 ti - y OR ~? A ~ y ~ ~~ '~ o ~~ ? ~ ~ \ ~ Z ~, OR~FK ~ a ~J ~ ~ ti ~ J fi ~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~~, ~y O~ ~ ~~ ~~G ~ ~~ Z ~ ~' ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~Q C ~ G Dy ~~' `\~ ~' Z ~ ~ y'~, u. ~ o Y ~ V q Ur~M (~ ~ ~ ~ ti r ~ ~ ~i G n ~ 9~ ~ ~ 0< ,~ ~\ ~ ~ C T ~ ~ Produced By Chesterfield County GIS ~~90~5 T0: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance -KINGSLAND GLEN SECTION 4 AMENDED DISTRICT: DALE MEETING DATE: February 23, 2011 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: ROSSVILLE CT ROSSVILLE DR SAILORS CREEK CT SAI L~RS CREEK DR Uicinity Map: KINGSLAND GLEN SECTION 4 AMENDED ~,EOpO ~0 MPS`S G~ `~ G~ ~~' P . W~tiRR ~ ~ ~ ~ G~ ti I SRR Y MqN ~ ~ PG~E~N M s~ qS ~ M AN~ S ,~ ~ F~ C '~S G G r ~ ~ ~ s DCR~US 'A ~ D Q J~ ~ , R VERITAS WAY 3 1 ~ . ~ 0 ~i 2. CAKEBREAD CT ti ~~ ti ~ ~ Cs~ `~ 3. PENFOLDS CT ~ G ,~ 4. PALO ALTO AVE 0 4 S C ~-. 5. FLORA SPRI NGS LN C~ ~ 6.OCTAGON DR 2 ~`' ~~ ~ 'p 7. ~' ~ WHITE FENCE LN 8. ~ ~ ~ sq FOUR VINES DR 3 7 i ~ 9. ~ ~0 \` MOLLYDOOKER LN BOURSVILLE LN 0 ~ . 1~~'E ~s D AR 4 9 F ~ G~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ 5 12 1. KINGS ND CREEK D ~" 13 2. KI NGSLAND CREEK LN 0~ 14 5 3. KINGSLAND CREEK CT ~~ 4. CHICKAMAUGA DR ~~ ~ 0 5. CHICKAMAUGA CT Gyy/ GQ- 6. LAKE CAROLINE DR ~~%0 11. KUNDE CT ~'Q~,j, 12. ROSENBLUM CT 7. LAKE CAROLINE CT 8. SHANNON COUNTY DR ~ 13. HENDRY AVE ~~,Q ~~ 14. CAYMUS WAY ~P~~ 15. ROMBAUER PKWY ~P~ 5 OR ~~..L 0 Z t~ 0 m ~o Produced By Cheste~ield County GIS oa~oa~ TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance -KINGSLAND GLEN SECTION 5 DISTRICT: DALE MEETING DATE: February 23, 2011 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: PHOBUS DR Vicinity Map: KINGSLAND GLEN SECTION 5 ~~tic~ s~ m y O w ~^ REGAL CUES ~~ Q~' G~ PHOBUS Dp ~o ~~ ~~~ PMASIS~ ~ MPGBES ~G N ~~ U~ M,gNq ,`~' SSgS G~ ~/ o,~ Produced By Chesterfield County GIS C?~~083 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance -STONE HARBOR SECTION 1 DISTRICT: MIDLOTHIAN MEETING DATE: February 23, 2011 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: STONE HARBOR DR Vicinity Map: STONE HARBOR SECTION ~ o'' ~~ y 0~ ~ ~~~ ~ rn ~o ~ ROBIOUS RD Opp q,~~ ~. ~~ 0 ~~~ ~ ~~'A Q~~ ~~ 9~~ ~ o ~~Q- 0'A ~ ~ ~ Q~~ 0 ~0 ~ ~ER6 ~~ Q- 0 ~ F~ ~~Q k A~ ~~O O~FSWO TH ~- ~ S~ ~J 0 wAY 0 o~ ~ ~ ~ Q- G~ 0~ 0 ~ ~V~ ~.. ,~ C1 u. o~ ~ Q 2 ~ ~ ~,~ ~ R ~~ 'o 2~ 9~ ~~ ~~ °~ ~° ~0 '~ ~ ~R r ~ ~ ~~ A~ ~~ 0~ r QP `' ~~~ ~~~ ~~' ~0 0 Q \ Ok 0~ ~~N ~ '~~~~ ~ J~~O ~~ 5 0 ~~\ ~G~ ~J ~ ~ 2 L ~ ~o ~y~ s ~ L~ 0~ ~ ~ 0~, ~ N 0 '~n_ ~~ 0 G~ o~ ~a ~ SRO Q- P T ~S~ ~ ~ ~5 F0~ ~~0 S GRANTOR w r a r ~Q N w ~~~ ~' H ~~,~ J~ ~~ ~ ~ Ri~~ ,~ ~~ ~~~~5 ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~A ~~ 4 0 ~ Z ~ o ~ ~ ,~o ~~ Produced By Chesterfield County GIS ~J~~J~9 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.7. Subject: Initiate an Application for Conditional Use Planned Development to Permit Metal Detector Sales and Service on Property Located at 2407 Sherbourne Road, in the Bermuda Magisterial District County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Initiate an application for conditional use planned development to allow a metal detector sales and service on property located at 2407 Sherbourne Road (Tax ID 791-683-9614), in the R-7 zoning district, and appoint Kirkland Turner, Director of Planning, as agent for the Board of Supervisors for the purposes of this application and waive disclosure. Summary of Information: Ms. Jaeckle is requesting that the Board initiate an application for a conditional use planned development to permit an existing business use to legally continue. A small building of approximately 450 square feet is the only structure located on the subject property. Mr. Wayne Aldridge has been using this structure for business purposes for many years without proper zoning. Mr. Aldridge states that his family has owned and/or lived on adjacent property for at least 31 years. Preparers Kirkland A. Turner Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director of Planning ~~ ` ~~JL ~~ ''rye ~{ 1: "~' ` ,~ ~i = /~' ~+ ;; ~ ~ ~ a - . ~,~ ;i ,~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeti n Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.8.a. Subject: Award of Construction Contract to ARW Contracting, Inc. for Phase I of the Animal Shelter Renovation Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Request Authorize the County Administrator to execute a construction contract with ARw Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $332,000 for renovation of the Chesterfield County Animal Shelter Phase I. Summary of Information: Planned improvements to the animal shelter during fiscal years 2011 and 2012 have been split into two phases. Phase I addresses replacement of the existing kennel cages in the newer section of the building, adds covers to prevent the animals from accidently stepping into the waste removal trenches, refinishes all of the floors, ceilings, and walls, and replaces the noise reduction panels in the dog kennel area. ARw Contracting from Chester, Virginia was the lowest responsive and responsible bidder at $332,000 out of seven bids received and is recommended for award of this contract. Phase II will address the older section of the shelter with replacement of cracked floors, renovation and replacement of waste drains, reconfiguration of portions of the structure and the purchase of new dog kennels to replace the worn out cages. Budget staff confirms that funds are available in the current CIP for this phase I construction contract. Preparer: Rob Key Title: Director, Department of General Services Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management Attachments: Yes No r,~ ~•~. ~.~-~ ~ C~ ~~ ~l'i. }~ ~~ c~~' ~'rr'' 4 ~I V~, t I ,~ ~ ~~ ee yY ~n~a~yi~~ N Y F~~v:~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: Febuary 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.8.b. Subject: Award of Construction Contract for County Project #05-0142 Hopkins Road Water Line Improvements Coun Administrator's Comm nts: County Administrator: Board Action Reques~e~d~` The Board of Supervisors is requested to award the construction contract to Walter C. Via Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $726,665.00 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. Summary of Information: This project replaces the aged existing waterlines that had become maintenance intensive and unreliable. This project consists of construction of approximately 6,150 feet of 16-inch diameter ductile iron water line and associated appurtenances. Staff received nine (9) bids ranging from $726,655.00 to $1,165,480.00. Walter C. Via Enterprises, Inc. submitted the lowest bid in the amount of 726,665.00. The county's engineering consultant Whitman, Requardt & Associates, LLP has evaluated the bids and recommends award of the contract to the low bidder. Budget staff confirms that sufficient funds are available in current CIP. Preparer: George 6. Hayes Title: Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director of Budget and Management ^ No # ~r~~~~N ~~ .~ ""~:e ;, r; i1, ~~~- ~ ~ ~~' ,, ~~~ I~~~Y~C r CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.9. Subject: Acceptance of the Smart Investing at Your Library Grant Awarded by the American Library Association (ALAI and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA~ Investor Education Foundation County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Request Accept and appropriate the award from ALA and FINRA Investor Education Foundation Smart Investing C~ Your Library grant program in the amount of $81,600 and authorize the County Administrator to execute all documents. Summary of Information: The Chesterfield County Public Library and the Friends of the Chesterfield County Public Library have been awarded an $81,600 grant from the ALA/FINRA Investor Education Foundation for Smart Investing @ Your Library. CCPL's purpose is to offer opportunities for citizens to transform facts and information into practical usable knowledge. This program is designed to increase the financial life-skills of our citizens. It will teach simple, smart investing principles to a targeted audience of moms and their children. This will allow them to take control of their lives by taking control of their finances. Preparers Michael R. Mabe Title: Lary Director Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA As a result of this fully funded grant, CCPL will develop FUN@CCPL Families Understanding Numbers at Chesterfield County Public Library). The program involves monthly workshops over an 18-month long period directed at moms and their elementary age children. FUN@CCPL will invite them into the library to participate in fun-filled instructional workshops on budget basics and fundamental personal finance and investment principles. In addition there will be ongoing staff training, mini-workshops for the public, field trips, incentives, a final celebration event, and a strong marketing and awareness campaign. These grant funds will better allow us to draw upon the expertise and skills of our current staff and to increase usage of our facilities and materials. The implementation of FUN@CCPL will result in a valuable, sustainable program for the residents of Chesterfield County. ~~o?~~•~ ~ ~G ci ~~ 1749 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Budget and Management Comments: This item requests that the Board accept and appropriate funds for the Smart Investing @ Your Library grant awarded by the American Library Association (ALA) and the FINR.A Investor Education Foundation grant in the amount of $81, 600 . The grant will be used to provide financial life-skills through monthly instructional workshops by teaching simple, smart investing principles to moms and their children. The grant does not require a local match of funds. No additional positions will be created. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management ~~~~~~ ~~-~-~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY t~ ~~~. s~ g ~~`~~~ "~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Pa e 1 of 2 lh r ~+a '~~ ~~ .~- -- ~~~' AGENDA ,~` ~ ~~~~~~ ~~ Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.10. Subject: Award Annual Engineering Contracts for Professional Engineering Services for Road Construction and Related Projects County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to authorize the County Administrator to execute contracts for professional engineering services for road construction and related projects with AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Austin Brockenbrough & Associates, LLP, Greenhorne and O'Mara, Inc., Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., McCormick Taylor, Inc., and Timmons Group. Summary of Information: Four representatives from the Transportation Purchasing Department developed a Request engineering services for road construction any were submitted by 14 firms. Seven firms competitive negotiation process based on their road construction engineering: • AECOM Technical Services, Inc. • Austin Brockenbrough & Associates, LLP • Greenhorne and O'Mara, Inc. • Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson • Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. • McCormick Taylor, Inc. • Timmons Group Preparers R.J. McCracken Department and one from the for Proposals for on-call ~ related projects. Proposals were selected through the expertise in various areas of Title: Director of Transportation Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information (continued): The contracts shall be effective for one year, renewable for four additional one-year terms. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the County Administrator to execute contracts for professional engineering services for road construction and related projects with the following firms: • AECOM Technical Services, Inc. • Austin Brockenbrough & Associates, LLP • Greenhorne and O'Mara, Inc. • Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson • Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. • McCormick Taylor, Inc. • Timmons Group District: Countywide (d~Q~97 ~~ Y, - _ !, .~.. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.11. Subject: Appropriation of BMP Reserve Funds for the Purchase of a Replacement Dump Truck County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reques The Board is requested to appropriate $110,000 from the BMP reserve to purchase a replacement dump truck. Summary of Information: All new subdivision and commercial establishments in the Upper Swift Creek Watershed pay into a BMP reserve account a one time fee that helps to offset a portion of the BMP maintenance program. The dump truck currently being utilized by the BMP crew has been driven 191,666 miles since March 1, 1990. The truck has been out of service 500 of the time since October, 2010. The Fleet Management Division strongly recommends replacement. Budget staff confirms there are sufficient BMP reserves for the purchase of the dump truck. Staff Recommendation: Staff is asking that the Board of Supervisors appropriate $110,000 from the BMP reserve account to purchase a replacement dump truck. Preparer: Richard M. McElfish Title: Director of Environmental Engineering Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director of Budget and Management Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No # ~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~' BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~.' AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.12.a. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land for the Extension of Mall Drive from Woodlands Real Estate, LLC County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requeste'cW Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 1.686 acres for the extension of Mall Drive from Woodlands Real Estate, LLC and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 1.686 acres for the extension of Mall Drive from Woodlands Real Estate, LLC. This dedication is for improvements in conjunction with the Woodlands Commercial Development, Volume II. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparers John UV. Harmon Title: Real Property~ger Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # i33~~99 VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of a Parcel of Land for the Extension of Mall Drive from Woodlands Real Es#ate, LLC r ~~ ~~ ~ OA}~Y C,~UQ ~ 4''~- W ~ ~R ~ +~ ~ tP ~ +° =4 ,w Y t7 Q4 ~~ ~~~Q p ~~ 1.686 Acre Dedication ~~ ~ ~~ ,` i t 4~ ~~ Sol ~, 4 a Cfy 1. B LU DERE VI A p~IVM1faRO~ 2. VERDE R 3. FONT RU w 4. BELLAVISTA RU BR,ARMaNr R GR~~+vs~~,+vG Ito ~~ ~~~1T~ ~- ; ~~ 4 i tl,f ,~ 5_ MARBLE HEAD its 6. H ~M ESTEAD C 7.SREDLItJNCT ~ ED LIEN PL 9. I ~N DALE RD ~ Chesterfield Caunt~ Department of Utilities . ~,. `, vu ; ~~~~ s 1 I~cl - 5~fia.a~ 1Pe t (3',3~'? +il~ rig ~~ ~~ /~/ ----__"=, _ '--asp `- i-'~°"'s.^'.TM,.. ~ ') l sus ars ~ {'A ,~g ~~ ~_~ ~ _, '~'OY&lolHON ~~~ ~ t~ap i ~ F tE - g~ a~° g ~' ~!a i {@ pie n: 6 g !li .. ~ ~~~~~t ~~~~~E Q~ ~6 ~ }~aa; 6 @~ 1` I ~ $ ng6~p 8 ~~a~~ ! g e ~ ~1 ~ ~~ 3 a~~. $~5~~ I ~F w~ ~" •~I ~ ~~~~ t a a I g a ~e~e~~ ~~~~~ ~' ~~&~~ ~~p~~ ~ ~~~g ~ • ~ , I ~ ~ ~~ IQI !~! t 9 ~ s ~ ~~ ,;;~ ~~ ~ ;~ ~. 1 8 ~~~~$ ~~~ ~~~ ~l I I ~I ~~, ~~~ ~~ ,~ ~~ . ' ~~ ~ ~, ~~ ~~ ~~ E ~ Ig~. 8 ~ ~~~$ ~~ e i ~~ ~ ~~$ ~~ a ~~ ~~ a~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ . ~v. ,yam .+' ~ ~' 1 ~` ~ ~~~'~/~ w .~- R~ ,,,,, ~. s W 1 _~ y ~r ~~ ~[`][i '~ _~ ~' "` ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~~ ~ ~~ ~R \, ~' ~ ~ 3 ~~ ~ :~ a~ a~~ , o ~~~~~ ~$~~~~ ~~yY ~~ ~ o~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~_ ~ ~, . o~o~~~ ~~---=---~v,~\ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY d w ~~ `~R I~ A ~` ~~ ~~~~ !~~'~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Pa e 1 of 1 `t °~ 1749 ~~~ 't~ ~ ~ AGENDA ti+1P Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.12.b. Subject: Acceptance of Parcels of Land for Consolidated Sales Company Incorporated County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: the Extension of Mall Drive from Board Action Requested: Accept the conveyance of two parcels of land containing a total of 1.141 acres for the extension of Mall Drive from Consolidated Sales Co. Incorporated and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of two parcels of land containing a total of 1.141 acres for the extension of Mall Drive from Consolidated Sales Co. Incorporated. This dedication is for improvements in conjunction with the Woodlands Commercial Development, Volume II. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager # o~~~ Paz VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of Parcels of Land for the Extension of Mall Drive from Consolidated Sales Co. Incorporated r ~~ ~v OA}~Y G~ ~~ +t~ a 4R $ +~ C~ ~P ~ A ~~ ~~ Y ~Q ~~ ~4~4 J~ ~ d2 4 i~'e ~.~DQ9 Acre Dedi cation lQ ~ sRo r ~- 1. E L~ DEREUI A ~0~ ~. VERDE R p~lN~~ 3. FONT RAJ ~a ~ . B E LL~~11 ~ TA R k''~ ~~ r ~- ~+~~~nts~~,nt~ stn ~.13~ Acre Dedication r ~R ~~N { _, ~~ _ F 5. MARBLE HEAD ~t~ 6. H ~M ESTEAD C 7.SREDLIflNCT ~ ED LIgN PL 9. I ~NDALE RD ~ Chesterfield Caunty Department of Utilities -. 'f . ,.. w ;, ,,~- E ~ I IICI ~ fi66.6' 1~e t f+~D0~~3 ut i~ !,: ~~ // __ J / ><~F ~F ~ ,~ .,; ~. ~w ~a 5 ~ a ~ ~y 9eii 3~` 3 ~j~' ~ - 5~~~ yea t ~ aii ~I~ a~'~ ~~ ~oii ° k 1 I g : i 3 4q ae~R ~~s~~ ~~~ ~ a' s ~i ~ ~tl ~ s~~ '~ 3 3. ¢ ,~ a~ ~~ ti f ~i ~~ ~~¢~~,~~~ . ~~~iE ~ 9 ~~~~ gd~P ~ ~ j I~ ,~ q~ ~,~ it ~ g ~ rs i~q 1~ B __9~_e - -~+---=_ ~~ .. ~s ~ ~s~ ~~~~~$~~~aW ~~~~~ ~~~~~o~. r ~~ ~~ k f I~ i ~~~~d ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ a 6 i sad .. -- ; ~~~~~~'s~~~~f e ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~g ~~ ~~ ~fR ~~;Y ~~ ~~ ~~~ f ~~~ ~~ ~` ~ E ~~ ~~ 0~01Q4 .~~ __`~-~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~;,,~,,,~' AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.12.c. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Robious Road from Talbert S. Deane, Jr. and Angela W. Deane County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Request Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.035 acres along Robious Road from Talbert S. Deane, Jr. and Angela W. Deane and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.035 acres along Robious Road from Talbert S. Deane, Jr. and Angela W. Deane. This dedication is for improvements in conjunction with the Woodlands Commercial Development, Volume II. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparers John W.Harmon Title: Real Propert~ger Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of a Parcel of Land along Robious Road from Talbert S. Deane, Jr. and Angela W. Deane r ~,~'' Op}lY ~~ ~Q w cr ~R ~ ~ U y~Q. ~ P ~~~ aw 44 ~~ ~~~Q J~ 4 a~ - ~e ~ ~~~ ~~ G ~~ 4.45 Acre Dedi ca~ian ~p ~. S~`D G Q a Cary 1. B LU DERE VI A p~~NaRO~ 2, VERDE R 3.F~NT RU re 4. BELLAVISTA RU ~RlARM~NT R GR~~I~SP~tJ1~fG RD ~R ~~~1 5. MARBLE HEAD ~t~+~ 6. H i~M ESTEAD C 7.SREDLICaNCT ~ ED LION PL 9. I ~N DALE RD ~ Chesterfield County Department of Utilities f W ~. E ~,, ~ I lick - ~'ib.67 tie t o~o~~s tii ~( -,`-~ --- _..~, ..,..~ `r,,,,~~ . ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~:. i~ ! ~' ~~w~ ~ / b .I ~~s ~~ l~ . ~~ ~ _ ~ --- _ dr~~ ~~9'R,~g~~~waor~ rwwr ~ -,., a ~~o~ gno,~,ox 1 ~"~~'~ ~ °~IE~ jit~ / __ _ t s a~ F itti ~tl ~~ ~ ~ ~aa~ ..~a ~ e sl ~°~S :w: aga ~ ~~1°~0 3~~~~ Q~ i 5~ a~g». ~~ I „ ~ ~~~~3 ~~ , ~.~~i~ ~' e°I b~ ~~~a °~g ~~ ~~ Ra 8 n ~~~ag~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~!q qa ___g!_e ~~ ;~~ , ~~~~~~~~.~~~ ~a:, s~~~ ~ ~ ~~ oa r ~' ,~ i . ~~~a a e ~g ~,si ° E ~ ~~ ~ i; i i i i e i' ~ ~ a ~9 k p e ~~ ~#~~~ ~~~~ 8 ~~~e~~~ \~ y ~~$~~~l~i~.~l ~~'~ `~ ~R ~~ ~ ~~Yr ~~ \~ C 'R \ a Ii s4~ ~ t 4 ios ~~E ~~ 04~m~9.~7 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~' `i BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 i `` AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.12.d. Subject: Acceptance of Parcels of Land from Douglas R. Sowers and Susan S. Sowers County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested:. Accept the conveyance of five parcels of land containing a total of 15.342 acres from Douglas R. Sowers and Susan S. Sowers for the development of Rountrey, Section 3 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deeds. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of five parcels of land containing 15.342 acres. This dedication is a requirement for the development of Rountrey, Section 3. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No #~~~~ ~,~ VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of Parcels of Land from Douglas R. Sowers and Susan S. Sowers ~.~~0 acres to be dedicated .: -_ 4 ~" v ~~V ~. a.838 acres to be dedicated 4.94 acres to be dedicated ;;. 1 ~.a~4 acres to be dedicated ~{:. ,r 5~~ I I ,~;~` r y~~5 r~~ \ ti~ ~~ SIMC~N~BATH D~. ~ p.~~ ~ acres to be dedicated ~' 70 ` °~ ~ ~~ G~ ~ '~ ~ ~ Chesterfield County Department of Utilities .1_ ~'1 w ~ ~- E ~:,~ __~. ~ liol - ~ 01.51 ~e t ~~a~ta~~ 0 '. 00000-5'885-~69_6!L ' ~,60,8fsL5 --a S/b' 13 ~~1 'uouua7 ~'~~1a8 ~ V 9t'S1~8lLll=3 ,fP'9F/ Q,' SS'606t69F=N -~ 3" 6-~LS-" ~ ~ 'ti ~~~ oho N ~~ ~ q W ~v ~~W ~w~ o ~~. ~Vw o ~; 'b ~~w o d+ .~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~w~ a ~ ~ ~' O W ~ A ~~ti ~w~~ ~~A~ a 3 ~ ~° G~~1 c0~, g no ~ ~ pip °OO^~ ° ~~~i ~ ~ 3 ~ ~?~ ~ ~ ~~z, v~ v; °o ~ i ~; v ~tio ~e oOp yo~~p ' ~ tn~ ~ ~^Om0 tl' a`i ^~~ O b p~m~ ~ °h 4^pN h^ ~o 2 ~o y o°' W g ,Oli _U Q C7 CS p N O r m O N 1~ h 2H na^~~ ~... ~~~~ wq~0~ ~~N~ ~ MATCH LINE ~ ~Q J~~O .~ r~ti ~gggg ~~N~i ~ , ~ h s ~~ ~ 9~9~~h~~Np 3 ~~~ ho 00"~~ ~J' ~O D ~'y N M 9 ~ ~ N 4~D~~9 0~ 2VVU s~ ~~~ ~ z ~ ~~ ~o d ~~~ ~~ b ~iQ,.D~~p ~ ~ M . ~o~ ~ ~~ 0 6 0 k ~' ~$~ ~ d~i° 3g~ ~ Rost o ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ °'~' N~ ';. 0 ~ t U J~ ~ ' G~ D J` ~^ e o° o ~ °~' ~'~s ~ o ,o Om' °'~~a' d ZCL Z r0 ~ '~o ~~ ~j 7 Apr O MATCN LINE a N ~Q.~~. MI'N 'W.i f17, ~6C~f OtOZ~/6'/~~ '~~Mp'u ~u~as~uw;c 7z3"u[~p;~,ouM\y,uyauuw~~; 1~~-u(~pi~~nuM\rfdtL\S ~MC~'~ ~ 3NI1 H~1dW ~ oo~~, a~~ ~ ~~ U N o ~,o ~ ~ ~ /0~0 ~~ ~ A p U1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1T ~ O V SJ~ ~ ~7 ~ ~o ~~~ h 0 ~O~Ov,~ 11,,,yy~ C3 ~ ~ ~ 13r ~ ~ `d' ZoG~ ^'r l~~ ~~ ~ ll~ I o ~ a ~ d ~ ~ V I ~~ ~~ ~p SN iw °~ m ~ r ~ i~1 w~A W V. ~w ~ ~VJ 3N-~ y~1bW ~ W ~ ° ~~ ' ~Vw o °~~ ,06 O 0 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~__ V ~~ Cti q :, ` ~WW ~~o ~ ~ o~ ~ U N r^~ """`111 W ~'A~C ~ ~~ ~ A ~ v~G`~1 ~ ~'0 ~ w a ~ ~ '~~ ch ~ r4~ ~~~~ Ih ~ ~~ ~ ~O ~O ~ b~~o pp mm ~nON r;~}~~r;~W~~~+~ O~F~O^Oh tp h w~.pp:V ~ ;n~ M ~ p t~ mN"S~h~NN~~h t~ 9 ~ v2~~2~e~yv~iv~°i~ ~k~~~, hcNpNio~o~i V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U~ w ~~l ~ ~7 ~~y \~~ ~{ r.~~~ 1Yr r ~c ~~w~Nco.~001N~lSN C~ ,~ho ~~"~'u~o^~~ ~ b O v~b^~hNONiwr.^j~ M A ~ ~88g8gg888gggg8 II O~i~6hn$~Wh6~ ~~O~N"'1~NN~ ~wNN~^~rN,`N'' H o~~~~~00~~~~ V pp"~Mhb~000hhr~h~N! 2000UCNiUCS UC~iC~,t d 0 m o N $ N N ~r~ g p,~ ~J oL ~~~ N p r g g w ~ ~ ~~ ~ II 8 ~ m U ~ J a V O ~ O /~ p,, ~~N Oj ,~^ve ~ S o~•6z16yD~~„_~~ .,rS' s O I _ ~ = i o ~~ ~ '~•~69.80 ~ sq 9~~ mn ~~ ~ ' g ~~ N°' ~ ~: ~ /o ph,,~Ve 9 ~ 51~.p °~ e.. zn i ~ oh 6 1 h, ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `" Na 24'3 45 ~ ~ 1490 19 W 30~ R~ ~~ c ~+~°' $~ n ^ 3D, R~W C18 64.16 ---N37'4819 E N o~~~t~z 0 ~ ~ ,W .W ~ ohho~ ma.r.rm ~ !f ;A;~N N .acO~~Oc~p Ucnv~2?Z N ~ ~ v ~ t~~~~h U^NNao^~ ~~~^~~ II of S~Njh ~. r.~ .....~. N w h S S ~ Coe^ro v ^ N N 41 ~ ,~OSO00 ~wNR~i~h cti~~r~opN N N ~ h ;~ O O ;h v ~ ry ~ ~ p 0h~O1 ZO^ O O ~ ~ O ~ pp~h~~~ 2UUC~UU 0¢ Z ~, T 01,9(;OLS ~~ •~~7~ ~U & Susan S. Sowers Douglas R• 00000 ^ ~ 718_691-6889"124 ,~ • p,B. 5794, P9' 2501 Otterdale Rd. R=3soo,oo' ~ ~ ~d ~ Q=4'01"33` L=154.00' T=121.05" Chd=153.94" Chd Brg=N80'~A 36 ~ a ~E=1~ 1111 g o ~ SOWers ~ Susan S• pouglos 8;6889-00000 3 ~ 118"691 p .124 d o B S ~ ~ ~ . le R ptterd 0' ' 2501 ~Q W ~ ~ ', 3 ~~ ~ \ ~, C O ~\ ~ON~ ~~~~ °o / 1 ~' A f1. Obtj~ O~ I .. °o' w S N~ O~m~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ b q a ~, I ~ ,~ \, o CQ N ' \ \ $ t ~^ ~ ~ ~ ~ \~, . µ~~g~ a~~G ~~ ~ ~ tie 5P°o '1 o ~ , ~R ~ .w., ~, .~ 7~ ry h~ ' ~fl ~~ 4 ~~ 3 ~ ' ~ 0g5 3~ ts. y~ ao ~ d~o gs~s ~~° 9F O °o cy 9g Op~~oB Z l S`ls ''0S • Z69. ~0 ~ S~/6~0 00000-9~66-~69-9!( 11°y ~ almW 578'27'19 E-- 783.00 PARCEL A 4.450 Ac To Be Dedicated 766.98' '-N78'1719 ~Y GWG C~ O q~~ ~qti `' ~A~~ ~,W~~ g " ~~ oWA~ ~ yU U ~ ~~V ~ e w~~~~ ~~i V ~ ~ ~ ~ Q O ^, `V !~~~jj ~~~A w ~~A~ ~~ww ~ IE ~~vw ~~o~ c ££~ ~ cti~Sp~ ~, ~' x ~ ~~M~4 -369 8 6 :1 prT15'03; L= i~~•~! R=3400.001=66,19 Chd=133.579'34'51 "E ~ po Chd Br9`' . o .iDa+. % o\ r~~ o~~ 1 c~d',n ~, ~~ ~~ ~_ N Mfd 'Wr1 (7~~G11 ~5~ Illlt(,/ti/ll 'I~'"P'~Iln~x~~ouus 1~~-Nfjp, i~noM~4luys'uoui~~; In~l-uSDi.~iooM\9~CIL\:iJMO\'I L,T N V ' ~' O /~ ~''('~ ~ ~ l ~ ~'' ..•'' ~ r o~~ Goa ~ ~ ~ -~ O~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ -o NS ~. .~. BP~N f S~M~ ~~~ R~~E w g6 -X-~, D 9~ R 36~ g1 3'a ~ ~ 1 ~~a4 ~ X71 /z ~~ ° - ~ t ~a J ;~ 6+ ` .~., \~ i~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 0'~ ~' ~~~9jos 0 ? 6 ~ 6~9 ~o~ ~o> ~~ ¢ s4 ~~~~ A9 890 0,~ 'bo~~ 69~ ~~~s so ~Py ~~~ N0. Delfo R= ft L= ff T= ff Chd= ff Chd B C12 91'l 1'19" 15.00' 39,79' 25.52' 35.72' N41'75'33~N C100 00'58'08" 1258.90' 21.28' 10.64' 21.28' S89'09'36~' C101 01'39'20" 1258.90' 36.38' 18.19' 36.38' S8T50'53"E C102 00'18'24" 2030.62' 10.87' 5,4,3' 10.87' S04'DO'S5'~ C104 90'53'29" 25.00' 39.66' 25,39' 35.63' N41'35'02~V C105 01'39'01" 1247.90' 35.94' 11.91' 35.94' N8r51'17~N a e ~~ co rn a N ,, 0 a .~ cn f ~t N d' r~ CV (~ 1 r•. GRAPHIC SCPLE 40' 0 20' 40' 80 PLAT OF A 0.016 ACRE PARCEL OF ~^`E''~ `40 LAND TO BE DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD LOCATED IN THE MATOACA DISTRICT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA NOI~EMBER 70, 2009 ~'~' E1rI~ & ASSOCIATE Pc ~~ JN 21434-3 Co. Proj. #D7-D384 G~~O~t't3 ,~~ ,Q~ ~~+ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~G{ '`'~ ~~` ,'~~~~ ., , f ~~~ ~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 _ ~~ ~~~.- _k, ,~ ~` AGENDA . _ ~;~~ ~f ~,v'-' Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.13.a. Subject: Request Permission for a Proposed Gravel Driveway to Encroach Within aFifty- Foot Unimproved County Right of Way Known as Marek Drive County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reques Grant Monty Gay Davis permission for a proposed gravel driveway to encroach within a 50' unimproved county right of way known as Marek Drive, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Monty Gay Davis has requested permission for a proposed gravel driveway to encroach within a 50' unimproved county right of way known as Marek Drive. This request has been reviewed by county staff and Comcast Cablevision. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager # 0~01~4 VICINITY SKETCH Request Permission fora Proposed Gravel Driueway to Encroach within a Fifty Foot Unimproved County Right of Way known as Marek Drive ~~ T r~ ~ D C~ J REQUEST PERMISSION FOR A PROPOSED GRAVEL DRIVEWAY ~ ~ V .ti ~` \\ ~ ~ ~ ~~ \~ P~ G~~ ~~ ~O ~ ~G ~ ~ \~ ~ Chesterfield County Qepartment of Utilities .i, ~. 1N ;~ ~- E :.~ ~:J.: IUoI-~16.67~et ~"~ 41 ~ ~ = SECOND BRMlCH 1~Q,l2 ~ ~, SECTION 4 " " 10~ ~ ao LOT ~ IV?~'! I /~ ~'~ ~o ,~,~~~ ~'- - ~ ~ WILUA~I B. dt GENE H. DUAL ,~;= 15 ~ g3 GPIN ~73f6444 i 1500000 ~ 0 •~ t~ D.B, 3569, PAGE 59O i E"~~'` ~'izs5o sECONO eRiwcH ROAD ~,,^ ~ ~ E~ ~ ~ (~, DWElLJNG ~ ~ SECOND BRANCH ~ 2 SECTION "4" ~ B,~ A~,~S LOT f 4 / r~ ~ ~~ PLAIN • AS SHOWN ON SllBDVV1SION PL4T ., \ I ~~~ ~~ ~ ' ~~ 217$' 200 0 200 400 Y """"' SCAtE 1" = 200 FEET SECOND BRANCH N SECTION "3" W N ~ LOT f5 ~~a4 ,~ ~ ~ ~ IVQTES: ~m ~ 1.) ~ OIW~VERS~' a,~ o ~ PARCEL r: G~IY w. ~ ANN~s c. ~~S ~ ~ N w _ „ GP1N #731645721100000 ~ ~ ~ ~`~` D.Q 9r8, PAGE !09 r ~r2so0 ~CONO ~ANC~ R~aao ~ PARCEL 2: MONTY GAY AaVrs dl41 Aq~ ~ q~lN /~7316~18845,50aDOp ~ Lor is ,B. 9325 PAGE r 13 D ,~ r342 r MARLx o,R>uE ~` ~,) AREA OF ucENSE AGREEMENT w ~, ~ % (,yi, ,~ ~ H.E. MORRIS ~ W.J. EDWAROS, JR. p~ ~ ~~ ~ ` ~ GPlN x'73,3645371000000 ~ 0.8. 7403, PAGE 506 r ,~, ,LOT 19 ~f Z5f8 SECOND BRANCH R0~4D rSIY.BR.ti;~ ~'12~Q0 .$~ ~ s ~ ¢ ~ ' ~ Lor 20 A~ ~ 'e ~s ~- : ~ ~ , . BAR. w-or~ WATERLINE ES~I'T ,p",,~'`~ `fir ~ ' ;~,;~ o.e. 4494 PG. er4 ~' '"'~0 ~ ~ , ,, ry o N~xL ' I ' ~~ f3 I ~. ~. ~I ~ ~• f ` II I N= 3644122.26 ~` ~• ~~ 1 !(~~ •~ ~~~ ~>> ~~o,, ~r,~ ~~. ~ ~ ~ NUMBER A~RE'CT10N o15TANQE ~~ a ~'~j L r S48'59'1 ? "W 16.28' PCTTS, YINT~R aad ASSOCLlT1~S, P,C. ~tae~err, lead ~rvoyar~, Zead Plaaaers ~~; 1B/02/10 96~o Court;towt~e Rae~d scale; l' = 200' ~°~ ~ ~ ~,N. 1010-05 ~ ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY j'' i~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 `___,,,,~ AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.13.b. Subject: Request Permission for a Proposed Fence to Encroach Within an Eight-Foot Easement Across Lot 51, Magnolia Green, Section A County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reques Grant HHHunt Homes, L.C. permission for a proposed fence to encroach within an 8' easement across Lot 51, Magnolia Green, Section A, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: HHHunt Homes, L.C. has requested permission for a proposed fence to encroach within an 8' easement across Lot 51, Magnolia Green, Section A. This request has been reviewed by Environmental Engineering, Utilities and Comcast Cablevision. Approval is recommended. DiStl'iCt: Matoaca Preparers John VIl. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Propert Manager # QtDO3'L7 ~ Chesterfield Gaunty Department of Utilities 1, ~~. W e~- E ..~f ~ 1 licl - X10.67 yet QJ~~1.`~8 Trrca. rat ~wuc~ ' vn: i of ~- n~~,r~ t~M~#~!lA11T IBS' MAY 8E S^tl ~' Y4 ~ ... D THAT ~-RE NOT ... W Tt~` ~-r~ 1.01' ~M~~Gr ,~ i , Imo' ~,- TY1:~ ~ ~AT~~ ~~ :3` ~M~Nt ~D ~ ~ S'~ ~ FRgN1' ~~ ~ ~ s~rr~r r'~ g~+v~ s,.a- ~" ~+~ ~ . HI~HIINT ~ONIBS L C . 11300 ~1~AR'TLEAF' PL DB. 9196 PG. 927 PIN: 70b6?5990000000 A Ma'~~c~ ~r ~~n ~pUHrtY, ~~~,~. rr ~~ • ~~ ~, ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ f~ ~.~~ ~ s~ ~ ~aa ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ . ~~ ~ ~' a!~' r ~~ ai~~~_9L9 a,~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~ "°"~i AGENDA .`~ .: Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.13.c. Subject: Request Permission for a Proposed Fence to Encroach Within an Eight-Foot Easement, Sixteen-Foot Drainage Easement, and a Fifty-Foot Natural Buffer Across Lot 60, Hartley Village at Charter Colony County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reques Grant Alison M. Nawrocki and Philip Nawrocki permission for a proposed fence to encroach within an 8' easement, 16' drainage easement and a 50' natural buffer across Lot 60, Hartley Village at Charter Colony, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Alison M. Nawrocki and Philip Nawrocki have requested permission for a proposed fence to encroach within an 8' easement 16', drainage easement and a 50' natural buffer across Lot 60, Hartley Village at Charter Colony. This request has been reviewed by Environmental Engineering, Planning and Comcast Cablevision and the existing swale within the drainage easement will not be affected . Approval is recommended. DIStPiCt: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager ~~fl'~.~~ VICINITY SKETCH Request Permission for a Proposed Fence to Encroach within an Eight Foot Easement, Sixteen Foot Drainage Easement, and a Fifty Foot Natural Buffer Across Lot 60, Hartley Village at Chanter Colony ~N PEQUET PERMI~~ION FAR ~ PP OPO~ED FEN CE q ~ Chesterfield County Department of Utilities ~ , W ~, E 4 ~ 1 Ircl - 416.0 tie t OfD~1~2 ripe ~~ to cart that ors 81'30/1010: ~ TO ~ made, an a;c rw~d ~ ~e pr I'10'l~1l~~I~ ~ ~ shorn hereon and tO the ~ my la~~wf dg~ana ; ~ ~ i~M ~OiOV ~ ~ ~ ( ~ w beef, td correot aid with the rM~rium ~ ~ .,,~:A~910NNglI~ 1g aide ae s.t brlh y the ~ G~ pNq. NlM~ ~ ~ ~I State ~oand of Artihltecta, Phef~i~elbnal .~ ~'' 510035-Oaf 8 ,~q~ q1~ land ~I~ore, and Gsrt~led L~~ndeccps . 'Archlte~, See ~b ~p kr er~emente aid reeb~klN~e cevrnantery~t~ not be e~awn pan .. ., ,, w~l~ ~~ y, . _ ~Z , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ D83-20'03~ ~ '' , ~ ~ :'~ .. .aw~ + . 8ut~ x~ FENCE LICENSED A .. ,/ .. ~~~~~ b~ ~~ . ~ ~ . i~ ' ~ ~ ~, i ,~ ~ . ; ~ ~ ,~~ ,\~\ ~~ ~- o/ - . , ,y f 11~ . ~;, ~ .~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ Lot 61. ... .. LG~T 5q~ ~ ~ ,, ~ . , ~ . ~ . e: 5. ~ ' ~ ~ . , . ~ b' GO'I~ION ~ ', , ~ ~. .. ~ . ,, . ; ~ . AREA ~45ll1' , . ~ ~ , tb' DRAINS ,. ~ . ~''~ ,. ~- ~ ~A!S~WT • ~ ~~~ . . ~ ~ ~ ALISON 1VI. ~ PHILIP NAWROCKI ' ~~ ~ ~~e~,~~'~ to ~~ w~. o~ .. 13918 LOTHIAN TRAIL CAALPIt~.D tzoav ~an"v ~ L~GEN17 DB. 987 PG, 3?Z ~ ~ 1.=~3.85' ~ ~ (~ ~ ~ODF01~ ~ ~~ . ~ PIN: ?Zbli9~300000 , , ~ ~ ~ R=5O.OQ . ~ • ~~ I~ ~i'. . ~ . YI ~~~6~ , . . . ~~~ . ~T~ GH~4~T' G4LO~y ~ ~ . Mi~T~~G~~ ~ ~ ~~ : ~ ~~ . ~ : ~~~ST~iIGT~ ~ , ~~~r~ P~ . T~~ I ~.~ ~~~T~ . Y~ ~ CIFIED lANp ~M~YOR A~ ~G7~IJL.TANT ~ . ~.. . ~ ~.. ~ . ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ 5yQ0-8 HOPKINS IND. RIGf1ri0ND,VIf~6INIA,~34 ~ ~ ' t10'I~RJ1T I'IQR1~ D06l~14l~ ~ ~ ~ I~o~n~caKyerN~~n ~.. ~ ~ . ~. .. . ~ tee= b~1~01~0~0 ~ oil Z'II-~~ ~~F~llllp J. ~ ~.IaD~I 1 ~ N~O~K! ` ' . ~ ~ ~ , . ~ Scab= I~:~O ... ~n T~,J ~$ ~ ~~ i' fi ~~~~~~ ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ,~. ~ AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.13.d. Subiect: Request Permission to Install Private Sewer Services Within Private Easements to Serve Properties at 2101 and 2125 Reymet Road County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Grant Reynolds Foil, Inc. permission to install private sewer services within private easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute sewer connection agreements. Summary of Information: Reynolds Foil, Inc. has requested permission to install private sewer services within private easements to serve properties at 2101 and 2125 Reymet Road. This request has been reviewed by the Utilities Department. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # VICINITY SKETCH Request Permission to Install Private Sewer Services Within Private Easements to Serve Properties at 2101 and 2125 Reymet Road 4 b ~trr~ m ~ r PrQpos+~d S~nr Connection 21~ RRYmet Rd / R~YM~T RD \ E ~ ~ ~ i 9 Proposed b~w~r Connec~on 3101 Reyrnet Rd v r~ O Q R .c p L_ Q { ~ p~ ~ A~ ~~~• \\ PIN~HtJRST ST O 0 m N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W !. .E $ 1 hcl -666.E tet .~ > q ~ O C R ~ a ' ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ Lj ~ ~ ~ n n ~ ~ ~~$ GQITA x Z ~ ~ r~~~ 'pQ ~ ~ ~~* s .e a ~ R O ~~ N~ '~ ' C~~& ~> p~ `" O Q N 1074'36' W 1 iM ~ ~ Y ~ s iJf.BC~ a ,'~, i i it ON a' °~ s; I ~' y ~LL___L lrt 5 I q, 1 " gR - ~ ~ -- I t ' ~'~ '~-_ Ig~gl --__, I:i~l I 1 I I ~, ' ; ~ ~I /~^i_ r.--~ I // I / iWl ! ~~ I / I I ~ I I j 1a~8 I Igl~~ a ~ I l Izl i K I ~ ~ I \\ I I i3 z I I ~ W~ / ~ ~ ~-~ v y _a ~~ & I I /je c?'/ i i ~ o r V...~ ~ 0~ / 1 I O"~~ ~ ONn~ < ~ I L _/v/ 1 I ~~ ~~a $ ~a~- g I I /i7-i/7 gr',--- ~~~o"~ s ~a0n$ m i '^I ~ ~ ~i i~ ~~~8 m / I C~WI I ~ ~~~ I ~+ ' -181 ~~={ ~, a I / lyl I x1 ' I ~' 1 I /~°~8/ - - ~ r 1 /_ ~'/ t ' __ --~-----~-~ I I ova. i _S_0794".f3 E s ~ ~ I I W , ~ _ I I m ~' \~ ^~~„A I I ly ~ ~ \ \ I I k t y b~ „W9„ ~\ ~ I v y L_-- , I I I 1 E~~ o ~ ~ ~ \\rT/ ~ I i ~ I 1 ~ I I 'r~.~ I I I 1 I W I 1 1 I 1 I h I I ~~ I 1 1 I ,!6'6[j' I I 2 ~ OYN 3 ,q;-L!0 S © I 1 1 ..... ...v... Lw..~o.TS...-.~ti....ro~..r,.-.-.,....w....a CHESTERFIELD COUNTY j BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ',;;gam, ~' AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.14. Subject: Designation of an Access Easement at the New Reams/Gordon Library County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors designate an access easement at the new Reams/Gordon Library and authorize the County Administrator to execute the declaration. Summary of Information: As a condition of the site plan approval for the new Reams/Gordon Library, the Transportation Department is requiring the designation of an easement containing 0.406 acres on county property for access to the adjoining property. Approval is recommended. District: Clover Hi 11 Preparers John Ull. Harmon Title: Real Property M~ er Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # 000~1:?6 UICIIVITY SKETCH Designation of an Access Easement at the New ReamslGordon Library ~ Chesterfield bounty Department of Utilities ~~ ~ W ~- E ~~~ S I hoi - 556.E;, het Ofl~~~7 ~y ~~ g b .. b N .- ' ~~1A ~ ~ ~~ 8 `. ~ ~ ~3 ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ i ~ ~. ~ ~ i~ ~~ ~s ~ i i i ~ ,~ ~ I~ Ir ~f ~ ~ ~r ~ ~~ ,. ~ ~~ ~~ ~ 8~ ~ ~^ o I ~M ~~ -., ~~ -~ ....,,.~ J ,' ~ ~ ~~'cf .to ~ ~ ~ "'.~Z~a ~Q ~ ~~~~ ~~s U{ +p, 1N~ ~ a ~ 1 Q M I 3t T~' A ~ ~ C` ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ I W ' ,~- - .` ~ i '" -~ ~ ~ ,~ ~t 31.32' 132 ~ ~' _ _ ~"`' '"~' --~ • `~ ~O~aL 6~Q ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ad~B~Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3'MYNnII ~ ~ ~ a ~~ ~ ~~ a s 8 ~1~ 4G R~I~ }F~~ b~~u ~1~ E ~rF ~q ddd d ~@ dfiYR~A ~ f~~ ., ~~~~ i :~9` ~ ~~~ E CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _'''p BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.15. Subject: Conveyance of a Traffic Easement to the Virginia Department of Transportation at the New Reams/Gordon Library County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Request~ef': Approve the conveyance of a traffic easement to the Virginia Department of Transportation at the new Reams/Gordon Library and authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator to execute the agreement. Summary of Information: The Virginia Department of Transportation is requiring the county to convey a traffic easement along Courthouse Road prior to site plan approval for the new Reams/Gordon Library. Approval is recommended. DIStrICt: Clover Hi 11 Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No #~~~`~..~~I VICINITY SKETCH Conveyance of a Traffic Signal Easement to the Virginia Department of Transportation at the New Reams/cordon Library ~ Chesterfield County Department of Utilities ~_ { ~~,~~ ~ ~ ~. E -~~ . mod,`. I lici - fi+6fi.G het G:DO1.~a r ~ ~° ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~- ~ N ,.. ,,.. x ~~ •~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ o • ~~N'd' Q ~ n ~ ~.. ~,,, z ~ "~ a ~ N~ ..--- I 1 ~~ I OOOOOOZOtlOLS4L PIId9 I £85 Jd 5'~SL 8Q 'Oa 3Sf10HJ.21f10J £££ '~ I ~ ray, O131~2l3JS3H~ .~0 AWf10~ t~ ~ ~ ~~~0~ N W ~ ~~~ ~~ _i ~~ ~'~ ~ ~ ,0x'669 3«£0~£0.88N ~, ~£0 0~ I o~ y~D ~~ R ..1 ~ 1 1A . ~ o~ ,~ W~ ~-.2 g ~ o~ a ~.. ~s~Z~-. a~ 03 v ._ c ~, °~# mo yoE~ ~a~ CWO. v _m ~ p~p~ ~ ~ aN >© O .Q s 0 ~~~ ~E '~~ ~W N ~~o ~.- ~~~n ~~~~~ ~~~~ g ~ ~~g ~ ~ ~~~~ yg~ ~~ ~ ~ g ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ N N OD 0 g v O 0 ~~ ~z ~ W Z ~ ~ O V J O ~~ pW ~C~ ~~ WZ V d ~i SWW=~ o ~F ~ V v~ ~~v~pt=i a~ g~~~~ <_s ~ zo=~o om~ ~~ ~~ >~ g g~ .~ r M r I a Z j 4 a "" ° ~_ , v ~ a~ w W I ~ d W ~~~ ~ ~. r b ~A :~ ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY " { BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 I~~ ~~~ AGENDA ,,;,. Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.16. Subject: Approval of Right of Entry for the Spring Run Road from McEnnally Road to Spring Run Creek Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Approve a request from the Virginia Department of Transportation for right of entry on county owned right of way for the construction of the Spring Run Road from McEnnally Road to Spring Run Creek Project. Summary of Information: The Virginia Department of Transportation is requesting that the Board approve right of entry on right of way dedicated to the county for construction of the Spring Run Road from McEnnally Road to Spring Run Creek Project. This request has been reviewed by the Transportation Department. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No VICINITY SKETCH Right of Entry for the Spring Run Road from McEnnally Road to Spring Run Creek Project ~ Chesterfield Jaunty Qepartment of Utilities 1~ f VV - ~~ E ~4 ~ 1 li~cl - 555.E !e t Q~~"L:"~3 ~ T 1 r ~d ~~ i~r,~ 1 ~ ~ ~~' ~ ~~. ~- f t. ,1 i 1 r ~ i + ~~ .1 ~ ,., j ~ ~~~' ds 1 •~ ~ ~~16~ ~ ill, 11r ,fir `` 9. ~ ,N 11 1 i • aa ~ ~ I f, i'~,~~ 1` ~ a 1 1 u f ra,-A ~ j I u f ,mod yn 1 1 ~~I ~ ,1 i 1. 1 ~ i II I 1 l ~g '' ~~ ~1 ~ ~ X11 + ll 1` ~ III jl ~~ ~ ,1, ,~ ~_ 11 1 ~r-=- , I p C l "j1 Na~+al 1 1 - ~,, • B~ ~ II ~~ c ~oo~ it 11 ; ~ ~ 1 1 ~ :•~ ~b ~ ~ II i~ goal , 1 ~ " ~, ~ ~• ~_ 1,1 1 ± 1 ~~ • r fj~r Ifl '1 ~ I .1 ' i I j '1 ~ ~ fo ; ~~ t. I j I 1~1 X181 1 m~ I ( ~ ~+ ~ I f ~ 1 1 ` I 0 `1,, ~ , 1 `~. if j f I ~I 1 ~~ 11 ,~ ~ ~ 1, i I 'l a ~ ~,~~ ''~ ~' ~ a ~~pII ~ ~ > ~ ~ o ~ '~ ~I~ ~ 11 1 per' FIII'Aj ~ ~' 1~ S~ ~ ; , ~f I I 1 NII •~l 11~ 1 ~l '~ 0 1 1~ 1 ~ ~~ q~+ Mfr ; j ,,N , 1 .~ cfl ~ , ~ j ctl °o°D~ 91 111 ,~ ~f J IW I 1 11 , j ,, f j j '1 ~- Il ~. 1 i ~ P ~,oN ~I ; ~ , I ' '~ I G ~ ~ i H~I+~' 11 i; ~ y I j L 1 1 4 e ~j'+'dl'~~ J~ j j '1 1 1 l J 1 1 1 f j 1 '1 '1 ~1 f 1 1 ~pN ~~ ~ ° ti tai f j I 1 i w1 ~ ~ { ~ 1 ~ f ~ ~~ 91 1~ 1 1 ~ r ~ 1 1 I f ~f 100 ~ 11 A I I ~ I ~ >~o~ '; ~ j f ~ I I 1 I I if r 1 ~ ! i ~I I ~ ~ r ~00~ o~ r ~ s 11 i 7 11 ! f '~ Al • 1' 1 1 z 1 1 f o '~~ ~, ~ vn 1~1 11 r ff ~ ~M 01,1 1 ' ~ ~ 11 1 ~ if ~ ~N ~ yl t ± N jl 1 ti,~ x 1, l 0 41 1 ~ v ~ wld ~ ~~ i ~ 11 I wld ZI ! ~~ ~ t; I f ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ICI I I a ' ' I ~ ; 11 Il~j , ~~ ~ ' ~ t~ o•I+~ 11 ~~~ ll~~ 01 4• I ~ I ~ goo I •-R-1 I ~ QQ ~ ~ I ~~ 1 i pia ~! i ~b ~~ 4 e i~ c ~a ~~ e i# t ~} ~4 iil ~ € ~ ~~ it 1. `11` +1~1 .~ f Op ~ZW ~j 4~ N ~ ~ Q ~~~ ~ ~~ . ~ ~~ V ~ ~ a ~1.~~ ~~o~ .. ~~aaaa ~y~g ~~~~ ~~A !a @A g2&~ i ~, i •~ " W ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 Y$ ~ ~ i ' i ~~ ~•f sw c~~~ C / 2 r~N3 ~r~ W rC~ M13 ZI .... 0y'w ,a13 i!1 if ~1i~11- rl II ~~ ~ 1 1 l~ `• 1 'ti M 1 ~.1 1 ~''•~ ` 1`•~• '~ ~ 1. '~ '+• ~ '~'\~~ R '\ ~`'\ , '`' ~f .` `1 ~i ~' ,~ . ` .~ ~~ '. ~ .. t 1,, ~ '{' 1~ .1` ~~ ~ 'i 9 ~ ~1 1 .1 ~•~. •1 /~ 1 1 ,~ , , 1 ~ l 1 1 ,1 1 11 1 1. 1 1 X13 ~^ gA ~ ~Z ~ ~~ ~' X19 X13 ~ `~aZ X13 r -S~ ~a3 4 c~ ~3 a~" ~~ ~~ I~ ~~ w ~~~ M ~{ ~o ~~• I~ c$ n ~~ ~ i !1 '- ~ -.1 ` • 1 11 f~ ~N3 Z~ M a ~ 1 ~-~,,~~ .gM ' 1 1 ! ~ ~,~ ~ Z ~ 11 ~ ~~ ~W~'- N~13 l~M ti~ ~` r ~ 11 ~ Q ~~ `, ~ ~ ~I 11 ~~ a~ • ~ ~ ,>M ~ }~V~ : t r, ~~ g ! ae i~i~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I ~~~-~'.. \ l~ i'SJ ~~~ f ~~~~ ; p~ ~! ~ ~ i ~~ 0000 ~ f ~ 1 '` ' 1 1 t ~01~ I.da " 915 13 ~~ i •1• 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ t 1 X M ~ I~~ X13 M 1t ~gta ~3 ~ a ~3 LxM ,,1 ~ ~1 1 ~ ~~ ~ 9MM 3 yXM r ~~; ~ ~ ~ rv t ~ yam. ~a . ~, C W ~ ~ il •~ ' v,. ~ l ra3 ~i ~ ,• ~ •1 ~IQ°' ~ •' R~ ~y3 ~ ` ~ 1 ~p JI . • ~~ `; ~ • ;;: ~ .;: - : 1 1 1 1 1 + ~ : ~ ~1 :~~;;: : 11 11 • ~~ 11 1 1 1 • 111 ~',:~~; 11 ~~~•'•~~~ ~ JI"~10~ "'"~ ;•~.~ 1 1 ;~9,M _ 1 1 1 ~1, ~~ 1 ~~ ~ - ~ 11 r ~ l y +~wd t 1 ~ SAN PiM'iM i . yNn ,vars. ~a~sro onro~r~a ~~`~- ~_ :~ i r lee ~ ~ ~ q . i .' •~ Ai~~d ~~ ` ~ ti-a ~, fq 4/ ~ 0 Sao/ \ '~ ~ ~- v •. ~,; ,~ ', ,. Q ~ ~ ._ , , ! ' ~, ~ ~ v ~ ~ .~, e ,~ # .~ a ~ ~ ~~ ~ 6 d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I., r~ v W ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I : 'fit r..fr~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W~ a ~ ~~~ ~ r ~~~p ~ ~ ~~ $ ~ ~ ~' ~~ ~ CMS ~ y ' ' ! ~ ~h' ~` $ ~ .~ ~ ~ '~~ d ~ ~ I ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ 6 ~ N ,~ ~ 2 I ' ~ ~~N ! Ir ~ Kati I ~ ~ ~ , r ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ i / ~ b :~ w ~ ~ I: iii ~ ~~ ~~ ,} r . ~, X .dd , l !, ` a MMOd ~A ~ : r;~ I' ~ N 0 ~ a ", ~~ ~ ~ f .{ 1 ~{ ~ 00 ~ ~~ 1, ~' ~ ~~ I• ~ ~ ® ~ .. * ~ I I 00 \ rr ~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~~ 00 rrMayrlrylNq~ 1IIpA~IMNI~YIo J ~ ~ 0 0' r~•- ~ twos. /- wrnrNuw ~ I ! I ~ ; ; .~ ~, c ~~ ~ I I ~ ~ I j ~ ~Nl 00~ ~ r ~ I I I ~ j ~ ~0~ ~ ' ~ ~ • ~ I '' ~ S9 ~ ~~~ kS I I •~r told I I '~ 1 1 1 •'" I r (i _.. +"~ ti $ x~ • w ~r ,~~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ sir sr w : r ~ I ~ ti ,: , l • - ~ ~ -' ~~ ~ ` 1 ~ ' . ' 0'~9 ~' ~ ' ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~r~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ° ~ ~ti • ~ ~~~ ~ 1 ~ a ~~ s ~ `. ~ Id ' 1 ~ ~~ 'r• ,~ `/ ~ '• ~~ ~-~-~_._. 3,._ .. t~ ,pan N~us~a ~~~ oNarH~i~ ~'~. ~~ ~~ ~~ 4 ~a ~~ ........ Q ........ ~ r M^ ~ ~ !p ~ ``t ~ ~ - ~ ~~ ~ ~M~MI' yd W ~ ~ ~ ~ P~ ~ ~l,pi ~ s voi Np~rt !9Y ~1A~l1i ~~ f ~~ e i~ i8 ~! N z a J a V a a 'a ~~ ~' a ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ZL .S o ~f~ f~ .o ~~ NdOIY,C +VIGMi r~1pW~+a+~0i ~a+i Mu11MMwou~p i ~Ni ~ j~ra+gi ~ klo~i «~wi i ApN i NdMI i pa+i ~ jp~rougi ~~~ M~II i Ap-ri w~~,aw~~o i .... ~aa,i ~! p~ou~0 i ~~ +qw,i iul~i ~u1 IAI~b i ~' ~ r~ i w,~~wuar ~ ~ M+ti q3 N ~~ ~g, ~~ i J~1S OO~N'WS ~114W~A' lAl~ 3A~'9~1 I ~~ o j ~.~...._... as ~~ ~ .,, ~ ~a~o~~~~t>W~a ~~~~ ~ ~"a~ o 0 ~i ~ ~~ .. xrre•no ~ ~ ~~~. i ~A ~ s ~, S ~ ~{, ~ I ' a ,t . fin{ ~ I _y'~~7 U, ~l~lf ~ L ~i ~ . I '~ w ~ ~ yd W R . i ~i~ j ~~~ • ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ , p ~ ~' j ~ ~ld~V M~ ~ WW ~~ ... ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ O '1 I I I ~ 0 ~-k,p, ~ I I L; ! I ~ p ~ p itJ~ Sy " _ a ~ I j ~ L i" ~~ ~~I ~ ~ :~ ~I 1 N3 ~~ 1 ~ ~ ~ .I ~ .. I v II ~ ,~ ,; ~ j ~ ~~ ~ ~a~ ~:~1 ' \ ~a ' , ,; ~ III ~ -160a8. +~,h100A ~Vdl ~ u~Ag ~/7'` ~ ~ . oas ~ ~ j ~~ ~ ~! ~. oMN ~; i ~ ern .~ ; ~~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ s ~, ~ ~ ~~ -. ~ * 1 ~~ ~~ ~ I 'I W ~ 0 4rj1 +M~,~ ~ t,^ rr 6 ~ ~ ..... , ~ ~ ~ ~4 4 0 ~ ~~ .~ .,~ i j rc~~ta • w ~wi 8 j a,~ say ~~a,d w / ~~ ~~ ,. ~~~ ~ ~ ~ 000 1! /? H~-S~0 ~15~0 ONOI~HOI~I ooa-.o~- b ~b ~~~N~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ yip - ~ ~ ~ ~~~ W~~ ~ ~ a ~ . ~. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ 4~ ~~ b~ ` W ~~ ~~ o N ~ o ~ ~ ~ Q ~~~ o ~ ~ m a ~ ~~ o ~ ~ ~~ ~ o ~ ~ a ~. ~ o o. ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~~ ° ~~ i ~ ~ o ~~ ~d ~~ ~4r ~~ s R ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~,r ~ ~ , ~, L o ~~ ~ ~ tt ~~'' ° ~ 3 '• ~~ ~ ~Agyd ~~ c „ d ~ ~~ d ~ S ~ ~11d +++++ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~,1 ""'s xis +w-ay a ~a~c,~. p 'dud +~' ~ ~ ~ ~ AA ~. ~~ ~° ~~ I ~wr , o ~~ + ~~ sreaaa. ~w~oo~ ~ ' ~ ~~ ~. ~~ . ~ $ ~~ ~ ~ ~d s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +m ~ ~ ~ ~d ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ $ ~a ~- ~ ~ Maur ~ ' 1 ~~~~ \ , ~II.C ~~ ~ ~~ NO 1 AIgyS ~ ' ~ ~ o I 0 ~ w~i ~ ! ~ ~ Mob11'r j i i i~ gaur ~ ~ ~~ V , ~ ~, ~, !_ $ + + f ei~ ~r ^ ~ i ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~N . o ~ i ~ ~rrd ~ ~ ~ ~ , , ~, ti ~ ~ r 9ocv.;~' ~I ~ ~ .,,,, u rr1 ~d I ~ ~..... w y wlp~~~' W r 1 ~ + ~ ~ ~~ w ~ ~ o '~u.C x~, ~ ,"~ I I 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ 1 st _ • "°~taR+~ar~r b ~ ~ a ~ u ~ A-gNr•~ ~~ 1 1 ~ ~y,NS I ~ ~ ~~ }~w ~ ~ .~1 ~nr ' ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~i~or..lrY~iWs~ ,\ ~° ~ ~S OD~3tJ'~fS w . x~ $~ ~~~ ~~~ ~a a~ ~d ~~ ~a t~ ~a ~~ ~g 'a ~6# ~! i ~~}} ~4 .d.~ yNn ,v~rs~o .t~tsro onrourr+~va ~'~'~ ~.. ~'~ ,:. ~~~ ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY r ~., ,t~ ~ ~~ yf i,` y~. c+, ~~, ~, _ .~ r- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ,~9 €~ AGENDA ~~~}~?~. '~~~: s 5A Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.17. Subject: Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a Variable Width Storm Water Management System/Best Management Practice Easement Across the Property of Uphoff Ventures, LLC County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reques Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a portion of a variable width SWM/BMP easement across the property of Uphoff Ventures, LLC. Summary of Information: Uphoff Ventures, Inc. has requested approval to vacate a portion of a variable width storm water management system/best management practice easement across its property as shown on the attached plat to accommodate for the development of the site. A new easement will be dedicated for the required SWM/BMP facility. The Environmental Engineering Department has reviewed this request. Approval is recommended. DiStl'ICt: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager # od~L~Z.~'£3 VICINITY SKETCH Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a Variable Width Storm Water Management SystemlBest Management Practice Easement across the Properly of Uphoff Ventures, LLC ~~~,a Sic ~~1 ttf ~~ ~~ ~\ ~ 7 o ~~ ~~ ~~ any ~~ \ ~ -~ ~ ~~\\~ s ~ ~. TRH PiC ~ ~ ~ s5` \ 2 `~ \ ~~4 ~ 0 ~~ ~ ~' er ~ 1 Z ~.. F Portion of SWMBMP Easement to be Quitclaimed 1. LUWERY BLUFF WAY 2. CR~WNE RIDGE L~~P 3. WYNN LN 4. CENTRAL P~INTE RD 5 `~Q 5. CREEK HEIGHTS DR ~ N .~~ 6. CLUB TERRACE LN 7. R~CKRIDGE RUN LN 8. TERRACE ARBOR CIR = .~~' 4 ~ Chesterfield County Qepartment of Utilities . ,i_ W +~- E 1 licl - fififi.fi~ tl!e t ~"~1D31.~3 a a., nA4RAAAA~ CC~~C~~ •. .• .. ~ _ ~~ Q~Q~~~ S ~ ~~ ,--I _all Q~RA~~ ~ I L'~jl ~11.____Ao • i ~ I a II a p ~ I I A v ~ ~~T`I ~' ' ~ Iy I I .. N I A -- ~ I ~o a . ~ I I ~~ ~~ ~ I I v bw I I '~ I ~~ J ~ ~ III ~ I I~ ~ I ~ v v ~ • ~ ~ I I I ~ 8 ~~~~ , Ile II ~'I ~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I ~ ~~ I a ! N .~~~~~~ II `~ ..,- ~\ ~~ _ _ _ _ _ JY~ X14 ""~_.,,~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ARAT•-- ---y_~'--__ ~ 4 I .,o I ~ ~~ I 11 0 I p Oq I ~, °p I N I ;~ ~ N ~ I I I v I ~ v ~ ~ I 11 '~ ~ ~ I ~~ II ~- ~ ~ I ~ I ~' ~~ ~ ~ 1 I v ~ , ~ • I .~ v~~' 1 ~~~ I 1 ~i ~ iii ~ .~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~~i ,~ i~ ~ ,i~ ~ ~ r N ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r : $ ~~ ~a r s~ ~ _ /~ ,, ~ ~ ;I I ~i, ~) "~ C I ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ I ~ ~ o ~' I ~ o ~ ~~~" ~r II ~ m ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ry~ ~ ~ , N ~ ~~ v ,, ''t ~ ~r ~ ~ ,~ rya .,~ , ~ ~ ~i o ~' ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ v M v ' ~ M+ ; ~ ~ ~ 1` ~ Z ~ ri ~ Q., PLAT 3HOYYINO A iM PRNATE DAAINAt~! EASEMENT, '" E S ~ "i ~ ~ ~ A VAR. WIpTM PUBLIC DRAN~AR~E !Af LMENT, T'WO ~!} . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ p YARIABLEwIDn~ BWMIB~ EA~MENTBANDA ~ ~ ~~ . . ~, ~ ~ .~ ,, ~ PORTION 01' A SWMIBMP EASEMENT TO BE VACATED, ~ ~ f $ ~ ' ~ ~ CROSSINQ THE LANDS OP UPHOFR YENTURIR, LLC ~ ~~ ~ a ~ tiu~-asr~ar ~ c~sT~+~c ca~rr, via OtD0~1.40 a CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Pa e 1 of 1 ~~ 9 ~`~ „;~`~ AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.18. Subject: Declaration of Right of Way and Temporary Construction Easements and Conveyance of an Easement to Verizon Virginia Incorporated for the Walton Park Sidewalk Project Coun Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reques Declare 0.029 acres of county property as right of way and 0.012 acres as temporary construction easements and authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an easement agreement with Verizon Virginia Inc. for underground cable across county property along Walton Park Road at Mid-Lothian Mines Park for the Walton Park Sidewalk Project. Summary of Information: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors declare right of way and temporary construction easements on county property at Mid-Lothian Mines Park and approve the conveyance of an easement to Verizon Virginia Inc. for underground cable along Walton Park Road for the Walton Park Sidewalk Project. This request has been reviewed by Transportation and Parks and Recreation. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager # Q'JL1:~•41 VICINITY SKETCH Walton Park Sidewalk Project ~ Chesterfield Cauntsr Department of Utilities . ~ ~ VII ~• E f~~ ~ ~ ~ U~1- 566.E tFe t QSDU~.~~ m 1 _ I ! I f I V .. ~ ! II 0 r 51'GI EMMP RE7D i i i ~ i i ~ i i i i , i I , , I 1 i ~W i ~ ~'~ f `~ ~M~~ i ~ c `~~iW~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ '~ i ~ ~ i ~~~ ~~~ I~` a ~ ~ ~~ ems. p~~j 1 • ~~~ 4 g $ ~ ' GENE W, `MORRIS I' ` \~~ `,~ t~ 1 ~ ~ ~ & BARBARA D. MORRIS i 1 1 rsis~e~ooz 14ib~~ ~ '~°' ~ ~ ~ ! GPIN '73zr05399 W J 0~ 990 PG 5 ~ I `'~ i °~ ~ COUNTY OF +~ + x.000 ,4c, I ®wr~ RUSSELL E MELROY & ~.~ , n, 3 -~1~s. ,ggorox.toc. KATHRYN C MELROY A ~° ! °~`~ Cy~STERFIELD ~ ~ Q~ ~ ~s~\ GPIN 'T32T0551~ri6B00000 ~o ! ~ g 08, ~5~5/27 ! I '~l~nehud Un~'8. ~N~ 555 ~~! m 43,76I,q~~, 286 y ~ i ~ i ~ M~ ~ aJ p,SQ' N ~ ~ i i ~ „~-oMepe Enhance d~6 ~ =~3 ~ i ° ,' ' i ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~~ ~ ~ r ~ I ~~ kip ~ i ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ W 11i ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~' ~~ i I ~. ' ~ a' ~0m ~~~ I ' ~~~ ~ No~~ ~ ~~~ roew R ~ ~ e~a,or ~ e ~~ ~ ~ t.~ T d for wr I ~ ~~ I ~ ~ ~ Prgo~l' I1~1 1 i~ ~ Grovel prhe ~, iI ~+'a.Uaew-+~a ~; !• ~ ^ • • . M • •. •. r ~ ~ rr ~r . •~ • .....~ a. I ` I N .~ ~l.f ~~ .. /,.. 1 Ll . . I r,.~1•.II,.r..N.\•Ir,•• _ 1 •~ , ~f. NM•• ` 1 1 .\ `, \ \ `,\ \•\ ;, •; ;~, ~,\,\\•\, 14 \' .\,\,\~\•\,\, Y~ `,\., •~ ' ,, ~r ...-sue `• ~ ,\ \•. .\ \. •\ ,` \, \ ~, ~\ ~~ \ \. 1'+ \. ,\. r~ , ~~rS •~!V I , III' 4a ~ \ ,\. ,\ .\ • ' \~` \ \'\ ,\'\'\'~~~'~~~~"-= -~-- B'W ~•~~~- /"~`-~-- !Rf N212r50w Bab I Z: ; ~,~ ,' I ~~- ~,r,, '\,\ '\ ~~~/ ~~~ ~~G/oval IRf i ~ h i ~~; •r..~ ,..... ., . .I ... ~r• 31 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ !RF d ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ °' ~ I ~ ~ I ~ a 1Z~ 3 I W4. I ~ ~j M0~"E~0rerko- Exl~llnp EMronoe~r i ~ ~ ~ i ~ I f - ~~._,, ~ as Rl~lt lEa~-1Sloe o1 Wo~kr- Pork Rd. i ~ ~ i / i i 1 - ,~ ~ -.,~-3 rle b Exl11•rp'fran Ealpe d Pove+ronr ~ ~ ~. ~~~ r i ~ '~ ~ - ~ ~ ; ~ GRCRE LLC ET ~ g~ ~ ~~ 3 0 ~" I ~ cP~N '133T0s8s '~ I ~ aW - ~ ~ i JESSIE B, SPA ~ '` `' i "' dB. 6535 PG 64~ 1 ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ GPIN ~ 2T M, SPA a DANIEL FUREy ~ ! W 56,eoo Ac, ; r ~ ~ o ; Q,e. ~ I i ~ GPI~~T32105r0730Q7pp ON I ~ ~ I i ~ a~ i I,50p p~ t~ ~ ~ ~ Ac. N/~ ~ I AEL A • 9'YD' 61J~ fRT1 p, 6~ I ~' ~` ~ I I PI' X95 ~ ~ !n Pl, SQ~ory ~IH rN13'32'001~V M2.34'1 L • 978' i j QEL~ ' ~~ ', Rlm • 308,48 I T ~'~ T ,} g ~n-'.lr~f6'NWI.300,9rY ~ ~ I ~ Inv. InrG'SWJ • 30n92' PT • 35•n,>?-1 i i R • ~QDO' lnv, Ow . 30D~ i AC ~ J~r1~3 i i i i PRC •Jf•6~J ~ I I ~ i i i i I to i I ~s,~, ~~'~ i ~~'.~, WALTON PARK ROAD ~ SIDEWALK, PHASE II ~~ 0~~~~3 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.19. Subject: Adoption of Revised Resolution for State Road Acceptance of the Woolridge Road Reservoir Causeway County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reques Adoption of the attached revised resolution for state acceptance of the Woolridge Road Reservoir Causeway, as requested by the Virginia Department of Transportation. Summary of Information: VDOT has requested that the standar~ by the Board of Supervisors on N additional language that would warn be free of faulty workmanship ar. reimburse VDOT for any cost it may during the period of one year from ~ state road acceptance resolution adopted ~vember 17, 2010 be revised to include ant that Woolridge Road Reservoir Causeway ~ materials and require the county to incur in the repair of faults corrected the date of the resolution. At the time Transportation staff paid the maintenance fee to VDOT, a request was made that the one-year performance bond be waived. Although VDOT waived the fee, they still require the locality to be responsible for the road for one year, consistent with the private sector. Therefore, VDOT is requesting that the additional language be added to the resolution. The contractor that constructed the roadway provided the county with a one- year performance bond. This bond will be in force during the entire warranty period required by VDOT, so that the county can obtain maintenance funds from the bond, if necessary. Therefore, staff has concluded that the additional language is acceptable. Preparers Richard M. McElfish Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No Title: Director, Environmental Engineering # o~o~t~4 WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation. NOW, THEREFORE, IT BE IT RESOLVED that this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described below to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Code of Vir inia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED this Board hereby warrants the subject street to be free of faulty workmanship and materials and agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for any cost it incurs in the repair of faults corrected during the period of one year from this date, provided such faults are due to faulty workmanship or a failure of materials, paying such sum within 45 days of receiving an invoice for the same from said Department. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Project/Subdivision: Woolridge Road Reservoir Causewa Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Addition Reason for Change: New subdivision street Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: X33.1-229 Street Name and/or Route Number • Woolridge Road, State Route Number 668 From: Crown Point Road (Route 3699) To: 0.12 miles North of Crown Point Road, (Route 3699), a distance of: 0.12 miles. Recordation Reference: Db.8629, Pg.302 Right of Way width ( feet) = var • Woolridge Road, State Route Number 668 From: 0.12 miles North of Crown Point Road (Route 3699) To: 0.32 miles North of Crown Point Road, (Route 3699), a distance of: 0.20 miles. Recordation Reference: Db.8629, Pg.302 Right of Way width ( feet ) = var • Woolridge Road, State Route Number 668 From: 0.52 miles North of Crown Point Road (Route 3699) To: Genito Road, (Route 604), a distance of: 0.13 miles. Recordation Reference: Db.8629, Pg.302 Right of Way width ( feet ) = var ~'~'~~.,~~ • Woolridge Road, State Route Number 668 From: 0.44 miles North of Crown Point Road (Route 3699) To: 0.52 miles North of Crown Point Road, (Route 3699), a distance of: 0.08 miles. Recordation Reference: Db.8629, Pg.302 Right of Way width (feet) = var • Woolridge Road, State Route Number 668 From: 0.32 miles North of Crown Point Road (Route 3699) To: 0.44 miles North of Crown Point Rd., (Route 3699), a distance of: 0.12 miles. Recordation Reference: Db.8629, Pg.302 Right of Way width ( feet ) = var Q9~0_l4€ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY O BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.2o. Subject: Transfer of District Improvement Funds to the Chesterfield County School Board for Post-Prom Celebrations County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to transfer $1,800 from the Bermuda District Improvement Fund, $2,800 from the Clover Hill District Improvement Fund, $1,800 from the Dale District Improvement Fund, $2,800 from the Matoaca District Improvement Fund, and $2,300 from the Midlothian District Improvement Fund to the Chesterfield County School Board for drug- and alcohol-free post-prom celebrations subject to the conditions described below. Summary of Information: All Supervisors have requested the Board to transfer funds from their respective District Improvement Funds to the Chesterfield County School Board for drug- and alcohol-free post-prom celebrations at various local area high schools. The requested amounts from each fund are as follows: Bermuda: $1,000 for Thomas Dale $200 for Chesterfield Communit Regional Governor's School Total: $1,800 Preparers Allan M. Carmody High School, $500 for L.C. Bird High School, y High School, and $100 for the Appomattox Title: Director, Budget and Management 0425:85561.1 Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # OSDQ~.•4'? CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page2of2 Clover School , School, Total: Hill: $1,000 for Monacan High School, $1,000 for Clover Hill $500 for Cosby High School, $200 for Chesterfield Community and $100 for Appomattox Regional Governor's School $2, 800 High High Dale: $1,000 for Meadowbrook High School, $500 for L.C. Bird High School, $200 for Chesterfield Community High School, and $100 for Appomattox Regional Governor's School Total: $1,800 Matoaca: $1,000 for Manchester High School, $1,000 for Matoaca High School, $500 for Cosby High School, $200 for the Chesterfield Community High School, and $100 for Appomattox Regional Governor's School Total: $2,800 Midlothian: $1,000 for Midlothian High School, $1,000 for James River High School, $200 for the Chesterfield Community High School, and $100 for Appomattox Regional Governor's School Total: $2,300 A portion of this request is from the Appomattox Regional Governor's School, which is located in Petersburg and includes 129 Chesterfield County students. Since the Governor's School is a regional public school facility and is legally independent of the Chesterfield County School Board, the School Board will have to take action to authorize the transfer of the total $500 payment to the Governor's School. Accordingly, if the Board of Supervisors approves the transfer of the funds to the School Board, the money cannot be given to the Governor's School unless the School Board also takes public action to approve the transfer to the Governor's School. If the School Board does not approve the transfer, the $500 must be returned to the County. The remaining requests for funds originally came from each school's PISA or Prom Committee. The County is not legally authorized to transfer funds to these organizations or committees. The County is authorized to transfer funds to the School Board but only if the transfer is contingent on the money being placed in capital projects or school operating accounts to be applied to appropriate school-funded post-prom activities. The school system must write checks directly to vendors who will be supplying goods or services to post-prom events and these goods and services must be purchased in accordance with the Virginia Public Procurement Act. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. (~ ~ ~ ~,~~ Page 1 DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATfON Thts appl(caban must bye complQted and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with Disttfct Improvement Funds. Completing and Signing this fvnn does nvt mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consido~ your request, Virginia law places subs~ntial restrictions on the authority of the County ~o give public funds, such as District Improveme~n# Finds, ~o privatie p rsot~ or organizafion~ and these restrictions may pneclud~ the County's Board , f 3uporvlsoe~a from even considering your nquesL 1. UVhat is the na a of the applicant ~persan or org nizationj making this funding request? l Thomas Dale ~ligh ~choo! PTSA, Hancy Elena, Afar Pram Cha~rntan ~ If an o~ganizatibn is the applicant, what is the na#ur~ an purpose of the organization? (Also attach o anization's most recen# articles of into oration andlor bylaws to application.) The purpose of the Y ~S PTS~4 is to bring into closet raladon students, parents and teachers a that they may cooperate in the education of our children and you#h. 3. UVhat is the am unt of funding you are seeking? s~ ooo~oo ~4. pescribe in defi~il the funding request and how the money, if approveal, will be spent. The funds would be used for stude~t raffle prizes as an incentive to stay though the night. 5. l5 any County D project, evenfi of you are seeking #partment invohred in the program for which Funds? No 6. If this request fob your actively or d individuals or or~ the remainder ofl funding will not fully fund ragrasn, what other anizationS will provide the funding? Qoo~~~ Page 2 Other funding for tie After Prom ill tome from our Parent Phone a thon, ~cket sal®s, and proceeds t~dro our PTSA~ fundraisers; ;nctuding yard sales, wNnter dance ands iris war eat®s~ P 7, if applicant is n organization, answer the following; is the organ' ation a corporation? Yes ^ No ~ Is the organix Lion non-profit? Yep X51 No ~1 Is the organix tion tax-exempfi'~ Yes ill No Q S. What is the ad rase of the applicant making this fundding request? Nancy ~tlena 4728 Hamlin Vl~ay, ~hestsr YA 2383 9, P malt eilen~-fam~ity ~tnces'~net Signature of applic~n'~ If you arc signing on behalf of a~n organixat~on you trust be the president, vi~ceMpreetd®n#, chairman~director or vice~ehairman of the organization, ~ ~~ Signatu 2011 ~DMS P~`~A Amer Prom Chal~an T~t{e of signing on behalf of an organization Nancy ~llena Printed Name F~~ a, 20~~ V`Ihat is the tale hone number;,fiax number, e-mail address fi the applicant? tale gone # 8014-?96-6981 fax ~ 7'8S-6a25 clo ~'hornaa pale ~#S PTS~I OtDO~-ifl FED-~S-011 08 09 CHESTERFIELD COMM HIGH 847586171 P . 0~i04 DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with ais#rict ImproYVment Funds, Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the Covnty can legally consider your requests Vlrgfnia law places substanfial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of supervisors from even considering your request. 1. What is t e name of the applicant person or organization) a ' g this funding regUeSt? e~r ~ ~d Ulf ~C~ ~ ~ ~' ___. Cary ~ be.~a~ 2. If an organization rs the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organizations (AI9o attach organization's most recent articles o inGOrpvrabon andlor bylaws to application. a~-~'~ ~ b l f'G SC~~ l + , 5~ ~~h 0 3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? 1000°r" 4. Describe in detail the nding request and how the money, if apprv ,will b spent. i l7 ~IGl7Q ~ ~f1C.4e do dJ•cr ~Dr2~ c~5e.r1'~- a-'A'-'~ . -~tj eI)'-1~J~-/ 6t. . Ia°17~' the f~a 11,~'r' /~"~'rt . 5, fi3533.1 Is any County Dep ent involved in the project, event or program far which you are seeking funds? p Pie 1 o~€~a_~~ FE~-OB-211 08 10 CHESTERFIELD COMM HIGH 804?6851?1 P.04~~4 6. If this request br funding will not fully fund your ac~'ivity or program, what other dividuals or o an'¢ativns will provide the remainder of the funding? ~buol~.n iS ~v~ Condor c.r.F~d a end Yt~~e ~s G~-i~t r~cr1 ~ /! (~,~~ o?mc~ fp ruin lnan~s ~-' ~~n , ,~ddc~uona.Q, l'~'1rn'tec~ U..Z 1 l Ike il~ c~(~d 1 (e -~ricf .gym v~ rne.~~ ds r,~-til l dot.!! .a j'tk 0.11~v1dt¢ ~ Cp ~kr ~u cuu( ~a-+Z~at.i.•Ce-.L~.~ (~,~Y~N.[Gf IllJY)1~S 7. f applicant is an organiza~on, answer the following: ~ Is the organization a corporation? Yes No Is the organization non-profit'? Yes iVo Is the organrtation ta~euernpt? Yes No 8. What is ,the add~+ess v th applicant making this funding request'? f'1 hrskr,~1 ~~Q ~ t~3 1a~{D~ ~a[~~ l~rid~e ~ 9. UVhat is th® tale one number, fax number, e-maii address of the appiican#? ~4 ~ ~?Co$ ~ G~ 3 ~.~ .l~w~~ i i ~~ r ~~~ ~ w ~~ 1 Signature of applicant, If you are signing on behalf of an organiza#ion you must be the presid®nt, vice-president, chairmaNdirector ar vice~chairman of the organization. w 1 51~~@ TWe (If signing on behalf of an organization) Printed Name ~S,zoit Date 63533.1 Page Z TOTRL P. 04 Page 1 DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds.. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's board of Supervisors from even considering your request. 1. What is the name of the applicant person or organization} making this funding request? L. C. Bird H. S. PTSA 2 If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application.} our purpose is to promote the welfare of youth in home, school, community. our organization works for the good of our students. The PTSA provides volunteers, awards scholarships, funds and implements beautification projects, sponsors an after prom party, supports schoollhome communications with a website, hosts faculty appreciation events, hosts Core Value and Academic Recognitions for students. Bylaws are attached. .3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? ~~ooo 4. Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, wi I l be spent. These funds are requested to help cover expenses for sponsoring the After Prom Party for junior and senior students and their guests, The money will be spent to cover the cost of door prizes given to those who stay the entire party), for for printing and office expenses related to the After Prom Party and to help with the sports park charges. The sports park will be responsible for activities as well as staff to run them, food and beverages. After Prom Party informafion is attached. o€~oa~s Page 2 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? Public Schools - ~.loyd C. Bird High School 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? Chesterfield County 1n addition to this request for funding, our funding for the After Prom Party will be provided through business donations, parent donations, ticket sales, concessions sales, a fail plant safe, a pizza and cookie dough fundraiser, printer cartridges recycling program, and membership dues. 7. !f applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Yes ~ No ^ Is the organization non-profit? Yes ® No ^ Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes ® No ^ 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? 14301 Courthouse Road, Chesterfield, VA 23832 9. What is the telephone number; fax number, e-mail address of the applicant? 844.788-fi110 Signature of applicant. 1f you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, ot~oa ~~€ Page 3 chairmanldirector orvice-chairman of the organization, Signat e President Ti#fe (if signing on behalf of an organiia#ion~ Penny H, Cole 74607 Gravel Neck Drive, Chester, VA 23831 844-778.7203 etcolehome~-msn.com Printed Name February 8, 2411 Date l?l~0~ 45 Page 1 DISTRICT IMPR~V~MENT FIIJ-NDS APPLICATIaN This appii~catio~ must be completed and ~iclned before the County can consider a request for funding with Disfi~~ict Improvement Funds. Gornple#ing and signing this form does not mean #hat you will receive funding or that the county can legally consider ~~our request, Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority o~~ the County tQ give public funds, such as District improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board ofi Supervisors from Qven considering your request 1, Illlhat is the name of the applicant (pers~~n or organization) making this funding request? Appomattox Regional governor's Sch~~~ol ParentJTeacher/Student Association ~PTSA~, 2. if an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? ~Aiso attach olrgani~:afiion's most recent articles of incorporation andlor bylaws t~~ application). The PTSA organizes events throughout they school year, including post- prom events. ~~ What is the amount of funding yQU are stkekincd? $ X00,00. 4. Describe in detail the funding reques~k and how the money, if approved, will be spQnt This money will be used to purchase prizes and activities for a drug and alcohol free post-prom, S. Is any County Department involved in thEp project, eventor program for which you are seeking funds? No, fi. If this request for funding will not f~~lly fund your activity or program, what otha~ individuals or org~~i~i~ations will provide the remainder of the funding? The PTSA will hold its Annual Silent Auction and we will be asking parents for donations. ono, ~~s Page 2 7~ If applicant is an organization, answe~tf~~e fvl~owing; 8. 9. l$ the organization a corpor~fiion? Ye$ .,~ No ,~X~ Is the organization anon-profit? Ye$ ~~ No Is the organization tax-~xempt~ Yes X No What is the address of the applicant n~a~p~ing this funding request? Appomattox Regional Governor's School 5121N. V1lashingtan Street Pe#ersburg, VA 23803 What is the telephone nurnber, fax ~nu~~~ber and email address of the applicant? T®lephone: FaX~ ~-mail; 804-2~3-0064 804-225.3853 iim,rncdonough cx).dGis.vir~~nia, ov Signature of appllicant~ If you are signing ors behalf of an org:~nization, you must be the president, vice-president, chairman~directar or vice~chairnnan cif the organization ' ~''~ Signature President, ARGS l~TSA Title (if signf ng on befaalf of organizatlon~ Lisa Rioux Printed Nal~~e 218111 Date o~~a ~~a r. 8043302361 OlP Surgery 04;05;01 p,m, 02--08-2011 2119 arrl~i~a I IUN This application must be compleb~d and signed before the County can consider a requo:t for funding with district tmproveinent Fund:. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can tvgatly consldor your request Virginia law places subatanblal reatriictions on the authority of the County to give public funds such as District Improvement Funds, to private persona or organlzafiona and these neitrlctions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your requea#. 1. Ilvhat is the name of the applicant (person or organizations making this funding request? Monacan HS PISA postprom commit~se Z If an organization is the applicant, what is the na#ure and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation andlor bylaws to application. Parentll'vacherlStudent Aaaociafion promotes the welfare of the students and participates in various acfividvs for the benefit of the tllonacan High School community, 3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? ~~,ooo,oa 4, Describe in detail the funtling request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. The funds are used to support an alcohol free, drug free altvrnativv tv student during a high risk event, the prom. A pargr by parents is provided following the celebrate life program of the VA Qvpt of Educaion and the VA State Police 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program far which you are seeking funds? No ~. If this request forfunding will not fully fund your acctivv~y or program what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? ooo~~~ 1 8043302361 O1~ Surgery 04; 05;15 p.m. 02-08-2011 3119 Page 1 donadona and fundraising events Parents artd community 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: is the organization a corporation? Yes ^ No Is the organization non-proi5t? Yes ® No ^ Is the organizationtax-exempt? Yes ~ Na ^ 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? 11801 Smoketroe Drive Richmond, VA 23236 9. What is the telephone number; fax number, e«rnail address of the applicant? 804-794-1455 home 804.938-705o cell klmpa~65~yahoo.com 804-330.23G1 Signature of applicant. if you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the pr+esidant, vice-president, chairman~director or vice-chairman of the organization. Signature iNonacan HS PTSA post prom committee Title cif s~ning on behalf of an organization Kimberly M. Paris Printed Name (~ ~~ ~M ~1._ DISTRICT' IMPROVEMENT 1=UNDS APPL,iCATI~N This application must be complet®d and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request, 1, IlVhat is the name of the applicant (person or organizations making this funding request? Clover Hill High School PTSA,13900 Hull Street Road, Midlothian, WA 23112 2. If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organisation? {Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation andlor bylaws to application.} Our primary objective as an organization is to promote the welfare of our children and youth, both in and out of school. We firmly believe that funding and coordinating the Post-Pram celebration falls into this category. Below is an excerpt from our by-laws which states the purpose of the CHHS PISA; #ARTICLE III: PURP45ES Section 1. The Purposes of the Clover Hill High School PISA, in common with those of the Virginia PTAlPTSA and the National PTA, are; a, To promote the welfare of children and youth in home, school, community, and place of worship. b, To raise the standards of home life. c. To secure adequate laws for the care and protection of children and youth. d. To bang into closer relation the hams and the school, that parents and teachers may coopF e. To develop between educators and the general public such united efforts as will secure for all children and youth the highest advantages in physical, mental, social, and spiritual education. Section 2. The Purposes of the Virginia PTAIPTSA, the National PTA and the Clover Hill High School PTSA are promoted through an educational program directed toward parents, teachers, and the general public; are developed through conferences, committees, projects, and programs; and are governed and qualified by the basic policies set forth in Article lV. Section 3. The organization is organized exclusively for the charitable, scientific, literary or educational purposes within the meaning of Section 501(c}(3} of the Internal revenue Code or corresponding Section of any future federal tax code thereinafter "Internal Revenue Code"~. Page 1 of 7 0~01~fl 3. Vllhat is the amount of funding you are seeking? X1,000.00 4or more if possible!} 4. Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. We are requesting a donation of $1,000 to help fund the Clover Hill High School Past- Prom celebration on April 24, 2010, Dur post-prom will be held at Robious Sports and Fitness Center this year, from 11:3a p.m. to 4:00 a.m. It will include karaoke, games, food, prizes, free photographs, fun tattoos, inflatable games, music, decorations, and much more - al{ designed to keep the students occupied and safe through the night. The cost for the facility this year is $2050. The County's donation will be used to help pay Robious Sports and Fitness for the use of their facility. 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? No. The event is sponsored and paid for by the Clover Mill HS PTSA, with donations from our parents, teachers, students, and area businesses. We coordinate this closely with the Claver Hill High School JuniorlSenior Prom committee, and with the administration of Clover Hill High who has been incredibly supportive and helpful. We also receive a great deal of support from our faculty and administrators, many of whom volunteer for post prom, and who donate their time and money to make this happen. 6 if this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizatians will provide the remainder of the funding? Other individuals and organizations that provide funding for the CHHS Post-Prom include: Families of CHHS students CHHS teachers and administration Area merchants Area professionals Area organizations, such as clubs, Churches, community associations, etc. A charge for attending the event this usually ranges between $7 to $12 per student, depending on how much we raise in donations}, Last year we charged $101ticket. Please also see the attached time frame, which includes fundraising efforts. Page 2 of 7 ~~~~.,~~ 7. if applicant is an organization, answer the following; Is the organization a corporation? Yes No _,X !s the organization non-profit? Yes ~X No is the organization tax-exempt? Yes X~,,,„ No 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? Clover Hill High School PTSA 13900 Hull Street Road Midlothian, WA 23112 OR Ann Marie Luhmann, Post-Prom Chair 13914 Two Notch Pf ace Midlothian, VA 23112 9, What is the telephone number, fax number, a-mail address of the applicant? Telephone: 844-63-0666 (home phone -Ann Marie Luhmann Fax: none E-mail: amluhmann(~comcast.net Signature of app#fcant If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairmanldirector orvice-chairman of the organization. Signature Clover Hill High School PTSA President, PTSA _.-._... Nancy Phibbs Page 3 of 7 QOQ~t.~2 Clover Hi11 High School PTSA Post-Prom Chair PTSA Ann Marie Luhmann ,November 8, 2010 Page 1 DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. 1. Vllhat is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? Cosby High School PTSA Post Prom Committee 2 If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation andlor bylaws to application.} Michels Bedsaul with the The Pos# Prom Committee is a group of parent volunteers charged with the task of putting together a safe, alcohol-free and drug-free After Prom party for Cosby HS junior and seniors and their dates. 3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? ~~,ooo.oo 4. Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. This money will be used to pay the rental fee for RISE Richmond Indoor Sports Experiencey. 5. is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? No 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? C~00~t.~3 Page 2 We are seeking donations from parents and businesses, as well as holding fundraising events, and selling tickets to the After Prom Party. 7. if applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Yes ^ No Is the organization non-profit? Yes ® No ^ Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes ® No ^ 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? Michele Sedsaul, Post Prom Committee, clo Cosby High Schoo1,14300 Fox Club Parkway, Midlothian, YA 23112 9. What is the telephone number; fax number, e-mail address of the applicant? Telephone: t8d4) 814-4596; Fax: ~804y 639-8357; E-mail: micheleb123 a~verizon.net Signature of applicants If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairmanldirector orvice-chairman of the organization. ~~1n~11~~ ~~~ Signs re Post Prom Committee Chair Title (if signing on behalf of an organization) Michele D. Bedsaul Printed Name February 2, 2011 aoo~e~~ Feb 311 ii 02:25p THE BENTLEY FAMILY 80~-276-5375 p.1 Page 1 DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION This application must b® completed and signed before the County can considec a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request Virginia law pieces substantial restrictions on the authority of the County bo give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to privafie persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request 1. What is the name of the applicant person or organization} making this funding request? ~, ~ .~. j~ ~" ~ ~ (~1 ~r~~~~~~ ~~ K g h '~.~ 2 If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation andlor bylaws to application.) (~ ~ ~o~a ~ K. ~ ,S , l c~ ~ ~~ Qs ~ uc ~~E , r~5oct~C~2 ~+ C~~~~ cam: a~~.:~~~~~5 a~ ~ ~ CAS ~ ~ S v21a~1~ Soy ~ ~~K`~ ~ 3, What is the amount of funding you are w ~ ~~ , ~ ~~~.~o~ °~- . ~' seeking? ~ ~ C o~ ' i e fundin re uest and ~'~ ~. ~ ~ -~I4 u,=c;~~~ ~ ~~ `~ ~s'~~ 4, Descnbe ~n data l th g Q how the money, ~ approved, will be spent. ~+~ ~•~rur ie uc~~-~ ~,~ c~~.~r~ 3 ~,~~ ~,~ C~14~ ~1~~c,, ~~ AI~+dCI ~O~t l ~( ~tSS~ ~` 5. Is ark ~oun De artment involved in e ~ ~ Y hl P project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? !gyp 6. !f this request for funding will not fully fund ~~, ~~l( ~c~.e... ~ - 0~at.~s. your activity or program, what other ~ ~o ~ -~,,~~ ~,~ ~, ~, ~~s~ ' ' r~nll ravide indlv~duals or organ~zat~ons p 5~:.y,a~ ~ ~~ w~• ~th+~l ~ , ~~~ ~ ~ the remainder of the funding. ~~ ~ ~. 4Jtc~ ~'~~ ~ a sst~ ~1r~~ c ~ ~ ~~ ~- , ~ ~ ~ l ~~ 't,;, i ' 0 t~L~ 5~,,~~ ~ ~~. 0001.5 ~. L~ F~b'ii i~ 0~:~7p THE HEnTLEY FRMiLY 804-~7s-s375 p.i Page 7, If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Yes [] No Is the o anization non- rofit? Yes ~ , No ~ [] ~ P ' Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes ~'''~ No ^ 8. What is the address of the applicant ~~ a (~~,~~~ ~ ~( polQ~j r~ Lance making this funding request? .~R~-~~~cs~~.~. ~c~,M~d, ~'~} ~~3~ oa- ~r1~ea~~~,,broo~L l~.s, ti a b i e~gb~, ~t ~. 9. What is the telephone number; fax number, R`c~^'r`a~d, V~r a3v~3~ e-mail address of the applicant? ice ~~-1~ey ~t's~1~t rrs~~4- j,.Adt~Lulv~t.~ WLSI~i .Cum ~}~-a~Q,~~~~p~.~ .a~~ aa~°~ Signature of applicant If you are signing ~Ce~1~ Sbb~1- 3~~~~a`? on behalf of an organization you trust be the president, vice-president, chairmanldirector or vice-chainr~an of the organization. Si nacre Title (if signing on behalf of an organization) Printed Name L.u r a f~je n`I-I~e`~ Date '~~Irjckgr~ ~l~ c~01~ oma~~s ~'~1R ''.M} ' , ., ,r~t•' w,~.. ~.. ~.. .,,yam.. Page ~ DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUND5 APPLICATICN This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request, ~ . UVhat is the name of the applicant person or organization) making this funding request? Lisa Payne, Vice President of Manchester High School PTSA Z if an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation andlor bylaws to application.} Vile are an organization that supports the studentslfacultylparents of Manchester High School, 3, UVhat is the amount of funding you are seeking? $1000 4. Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. The money will be put to use~for holding our post prom function on May 7, 2011. Vve will have inflatables, casino games, arcade games, door prizes and food. 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, eventor program forwhich you are seeking funds? No 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? .Page 2 we have received donations from banks within the county last year along with personal donations which we acquire from holding aphone-a-thou and calling parents asking for donations, Vile also submit donation requests to local businesses asking for money as well as food donations, 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following; Is the organization a corporation? Yes ~ No ^ Is the organization non-profit? Yes ~ No [] fs the organization tax-exempt? Yes 1$I No ^ 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? Manchester High School PTSA 121601 Bailey Bridge Road Midlothian, VA 23112 i 9. 11Uhat is the telephone number; fax number, e-mail address of the applicant? MHS phone number 804-739-625 Email: mhspostprom aagmail,com 0002~~ Page 3 Signature of applicant, if you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be th®president, vice-president, chairmanldirector orvice-chairman of the organization Signature Vice President Title ~ifsigning on behalf ofian organization) Lisa D. Payne Printed Name 213!2011 Date o~~t~9. ~2108l2e11 15;11 86475~.86~0 THE IJPS STORE 5242 PAGE 0215 Page 1 DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNS APPLICATION This applica#ion must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improveruent Funds. Completing and algning this form does rat mean that you will receive funding ar the the Coun ~ ~ r can legally Consider your request. v~rgfnia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County #o gig public funds, such a$ District Impraveroeat Funds, to private Persona yr organiza~ons a rid these restrictions may preclude the C+ounty's BQUrd of ~uparvisors from exer~ considering your ~equest~ 1. What is the Hume of the applic~rlt person yr organiza#ion}making #his fiunding request? Matoaca PTA 2 if an organization is the applicant, whafi is the nertur+e and purpose of the vrganlzation? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application. y Metoaca P~'Q is an organization that fundraiser and promotes ,supports and provides afe learning & fun opportunities for the students. 3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? 1,QD0.04 4, Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent, The request is for money to provide a safe and fun ~Fter prom Celebratiar~ far the Matoaca S~dents. 5, Is any County Department involved in xhe project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? No 6, if this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? Letters of request far dor~atians are mailed to county businea' and parents of ~taoca atu~ents. Pickets are sold to pay fear the cast of the facility. 0001~~ ~210812~11 16;11 8~4751g600 THE IJPS STORE x242 7, If applicant is an organi~at+on, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Xes ^ No ^ Is the organization non-profit? Yes ~I Na [] Is the organizationtax-exempt? Yes ® Na ~ B. Wha# i~ the address of the applicant making this funding request? Matoaca PTA ,17Tao Longhouse L~, ChesterField , VA X3838 9. V~hat is the telephone numb®r; fax number, e-mail address of the applicant? 80~ 8s8~T07 cell 8Q4781-9176 matoacapto~gmail,com or amyelliatt~A05~comcas#.net F~GE 03105 Page ~ Signature of applicao#, if you are signing on behalf of an organi~atio~ you must be the preaide~t, vioe~president~ chairmanldirector arvice-chairman of ~e organisation, ,. p, fn ignature ~at+~c Pty Pra~idant Title (if signing on aehalf of an arganization~ Aa1y ~lllott Printed Name 02l0412d11 Date 0~0 71 Feb ~T'11 12;'~a S~ewsn Barnard $~~,~~~ p.Z Page ~ OISTRiCT IMPROVElI~ENT FUNDS APPLIC~ A~, TIQN This applica~on nwst be completed and signed before the Counter Gan consider a request for funding with f3istriCt lmpro~remsnt Funds. Completing and signing this form does not me~art that you vrill receive funding or that the County can legally consider Your ~rsquest. Virginia law places substantial res~ictions an ~e authority of the County to giYe public funds, such as Clsttiot improvement Funds to private pvr~sons~ ar organizations and these restrictions many preclude the County's Board o~ Supe~rls~ora from even considering your request. ~ , 1111hat is the name of the applicant person or organ¢a#ion~ making this fundin .~. ~ ,~.,~ a •, ..~ ~` 2 3, 4. ~ an or~aniza~'an is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the Qrganizatiorr? (A1sa attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and~or bylaws to applic,~tion,) ~, ~~...~--Q ~~ ~ ~ r What is the amount of funding you are s88kiRa'~~1~ ~~~ ~' r .. ~. ~ ~r' ~ f ~~ ~~ . ~~ Describe ~n detail the funding request and f ~, ,, ~, :* how the rnone if a roved will be s nt. ~ ~ ,. ,,~~~~'~`~~`~`~'~' Y, pP Pe r~~.,f.- ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ J~~~~~.. G' 5, is and County Department inwal~red in the project, event or program for which you one seeing funds? ~.~C~ ,~ . ~ ,~. 6. If this r uest for fundi will not full fund ~ '~ ur active ar r ram what other ~ .~„~-~ ~ '~ ~ tY P o9 ~ ~ ~ . ~~' ind~riduals or organizations will provide ~T,.~. ~c:~~ ~ . r ~ ~,.~ . ~ the remainder of the furtid~ng , oc~ot~z • Feb ~7 11 12:3Ba Steen Barnard 5~43~~Z~ p.3 Page 2 ?. If applicant is an organizativ~, answer the following; Is the organizafii~n a corporation? Yes ^ NQ is the organization non-profit? Yes iVo C] Is the organization tax~xempt'? Yss No ^ r r1 r '~ ~'~~ $, V1Jhat is the address of the applicant ~~~,,, ~- "~~ ? ~ mak~c~g this funding request . ~~ 1 .. 1 ~~ ~ • ~ ~~ , ~~ t 7'~ ~'I I ~ ~ ~ ~C.J~'~ ' 9, UVhat is the telephone number; fax number, ~` ~~ e-mail address of the applicant? ~'~ ~' ~ f ~ 1-~ r-' ~N I 1 r~~ ~~, ~<~ r ~ . Signature ~ appticar~t. I~ you are signing • ~ on behalf ofi an c~nganizafion you must ~e ~ ~ ~ '~ '~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ s' n vice resider ~ ~ U~,~ ~:~ the p~ ode t, ~ t, r ~-.,~ , ~., ,... ~~..~.~.~r~. ai~manl~rector or vice~chairmafl of th a organ~zat~ on. ~ ~ ~ ,~ r, I ~ •~ Signature }~~r~~~ 1~:~- ' h~ ~.- ~. ~- ~~ ~ ~ nor anization ..~ ~ Tale ~~ signing on behaff of a g ) ,n ,,~1 , ~~' ~ Printed Nam ,~, ;lam ~~ ~~ ~ ~ J ~ t, , ~,,;~~ ~ ~ l~ r ~~~~ Date ~~ ~'7 1~ ~ ~.. . . C :~~ ,~ . ~ ~~~ 09€1'!.'73 Page 1 DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request far funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your requests Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. 1. What is the Warne of the applicant (person or organization} making this funding request? School PTSA Post Prom Committee 2 If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? ~Alsa attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation andlor bylaws to application. education of high school students. 3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? James River High Supporting the $1,000 4. Describe in detail the funding request and howthe money, if approved, will be spent. The money will be used to support the Post Prom even# for James River High School on May 14, 2011. This all-night event is designed to provide a secure, safe environment for our students to celebrate after prom. The Post Prom celebration also allows our students to continue their exciting evening in a supervised, substance-free space. It will provide entertainment, food, beverages and physics! activity for the students from 11:30pm until Sam the next morning. 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? no 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other ~~~.~~~ Page 2 individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? The JRHS PTSA is providing substantial support, both monetarily and through volunteer man hours. The parents of JRHS, the community, and business leaders are also providing funding for this event The Junior class usually is able to help support this event too. 1. if applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Yes ^ No Is the organization non-profit? Yes ~ No ^ Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes ® No ^ 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? James River High School PTSA, 3700 James River Road, Midlothian, WA 23113. 9. What is the telephone number; fax number, e-mail address of the applicant? 378-2420, Judy Deichman cell 337-1533, e-mail judith4125 a~aol.com Signature of applicant if you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairmanldirector orvice-chairman of the organization. Signature Pr®sident Title (if signing on behalf of an organization) Q~t~1:5 Page 3 Judy Deichman Printed Name 21712011 Date ~~L~37~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 3 ~, ~ -; + AGENDA "~aar~ ~Y Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.21. Subject: Adoption of Resolution, Appropriation and Transfer of Funds, Authorization to Acquire Right-of-Way and Enter into Agreements/Contracts, and Award a Construction Contract for the Port Walthall Drive Extension Economic Development Access Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action ReQUestecl~: The Board is requested to take the following actions for the Port Walthall Drive Extension Economic Development Access Project: 1)adopt the attached resolution asking the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to approve economic development access funds for the Port Walthall Drive Extension Project; 2)appropriate $482,000 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements; 3) transfer $25, 000 from the Industrial Access Account; 4) authorize staf f to proceed with right-of-way acquisition, if necessary; 5)authorize the County Administrator to enter into the necessary county/VDOT/developer construction agreements/contracts, permits, and surety agreements; and 6)authorize the County Administrator to award a construction contract up to $362,000 to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Summary of Information: Marten Transport (the "developer") has advised the county of its intention to construct a new facility off of Port Walthall Drive (see attachment). The developer has asked the county to seek VDOT economic development access funds (program formerly called "Industrial Access") so that an access road can be constructed to the property. (Continued on next page) Preparer: R.J.McCracken Agen759 Title: Director of Transportation Attachments: Yes Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management No #OJQ~?.'77 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA Summary of Information: continued In order to provide for an adequate access to the property, Port walthall Drive will need to be extended approximately 850 feet from its current terminus to the developer's property. Under the VDOT Economic Development Access program, the county can receive up to $500,000 in unmatched VDOT funds (200 of the qualifying capital investment up to $2,500,000) for the construction of economic development access roads. Before VDOT will authorize the economic development access funds, the qualifying capital investment must be under firm contract or the county must provide VDOT a surety bond guaranteeing that the investment will occur within five years of the Commonwealth Transportation Board's allocation of the economic development access funds. VDOT funds can only be used for engineering and access road construction. Right-of-way acquisition and utility adjustments must be financed from sources other than economic development access funds. The county usually requests industrial park developers to prepare construction plans and environmental studies, donate right-of-way, and provide surety bonds for new economic development access roads. The county or developer pays the cost for utility adjustments and provides the matching funds. Either VDOT or the county can construct the road depending on the specifics of each request. It is anticipated that the county will manage the construction of this access road. The preliminary cost estimate for constructing the extension of Port Walthall Drive is $482,000. The developer has indicated they expect to develop sufficient qualifying capital investment within f ive years to justify the requested VDOT economic development access fund allocation. The developer has agreed to provide a $482,000 surety guaranteeing the capital investment will be made within VDOT's five-year time limit. The developer has agreed to prepare the road construction plans, dedicate the right-of-way necessary for the access road, and be responsible for all utility adjustments and the wetland mitigation for the project. o~a~~a CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 3 AGENDA Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board: 1. Adopt the attached resolution requesting VDOT to approve economic development access funds for the Port Walthall Drive Extension Project and guaranteeing to VDOT that the county will provide the necessary right-of-way, utility adjustments, and surety for the project; 2. Appropriate $482,000 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements for the project; staff recommends appropriation of the VDOT reimbursement. 3. Transfer $25,000 from the Industrial Access Account to the project for the Capital Investment Surety cost, funds are available to transfer; 4. Authorize staff to proceed with right-of-way acquisition for the project, if necessary; 5. Authorize the County Administrator to enter into the necessary county/VDOT/developer construction agreements/contracts, permits, and surety agreements, acceptable to the County Attorney, for the project; and 6. Authorize the County Administrator to award a construction contract up to $362,000 to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. District: Bermuda o~~t~s WHEREAS, Marten Transport, Ltd. ~"Marten Transport") desires to purchase and develop property for the purpose of economic development in Chesterfield County, Virginia, within the Ruffin Mill Industrial Park; and WHEREAS, Marten Transport plans to construct a new transportation transfer station for their regional and national fleet; and WHEREAS, this new facility is expected to involve new private capital investment in land, building, and equipment of approximately $4,700,000 and Marten Transport is expected to employee 125 persons at this facility; and WHEREAS, operations are expected to begin at this facility on or about November 1, 2011; and WHEREAS, the property on which Marten Transport will be located requires the extension of Port Walthall Drive (Route 931) in order to provide adequate access; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County hereby guarantees that the necessary environmental analysis, mitigation, and fee simple right-of-way and utility relocations or adjustments for this improvement, if necessary, will be provided at no cost to the Economic Development, Airport and Rail Access Fund; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County acknowledges that no land disturbance activities may occur within the limits of the proposed access project prior to any construction activity on this project as a condition of the use of the Economic Development, Airport and Rail Access Fund; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County hereby guarantees that all ineligible project costs and all costs not justified by eligible capital outlay will be provided from sources other than those administered by the Virginia Department of Transportation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby requests that the Commonwealth Transportation Board provide Economic Development Access Program funding to provide an adequate road to this property. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby agrees to provide a surety or bond, acceptable to and payable to the Virginia Department of Transportation, in the full amount of the Commonwealth Transportation Board's allocation less eligible private capital outlay credit determined by VDOT; this surety shall be exercised by the Virginia Department of Transportation in the event that sufficient qualifying capital investment does not occur on Parcel `E' as shown on Exhibit A (titled "Ruffin Mill Industrial Park Roslyn Farms Corporation" dated December 21, 2010) within five years of the Commonwealth Transportation Board's allocation of funds pursuant to this request. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby agrees that the new roadway so constructed will be added to and become a part of the Secondary System of Highways.~~~,~ ~~ PORT WALTHALL DRIVE EXTENSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACCESS PROJECT BUDGET ESTIMATED COST Preliminary Engineering $0* Environmental /Cultural Resource Studies $0* Right-of-Way $0* Utility Adjustments $0* Access Road Construction $362,000 Construction Contingency $80,000 Construction Administration and Inspection $40,000 Mitigation $0* Capital Investment Surety Cost $25,000 TOTAL: $507,000 * Developer Responsibility REVENUE ESTIMATED COST VDOT Unmatched EDA Funds $482,000 VDOT Match EDA Funds $0 Count Match Industrial Access Funds $0 Count Ca ital Investment Suret Cost IAF $25,000 Develo er Match $0 TOTAL: $507,000 CAPITAL INVESTMENT SURETY Developer $482,000 ~fl41:~1 LOCATION MAP PORT WALTHALL DRIVE EXTENSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACCESS PROJECT ~~, O ~ Q J ~~~~ ~ '~ ~,1 a r ~. •' % / ~,~ / ""~', \'%~ ~ '~. r ~ ~` ~ -.1 Q ;--~,. ~ m Q ;~ ~`~ i ~~ ~ r, ~ r: PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD 850' +/- ~'` i i ^^ t i ~ ~ ~ i~ PARCEL'E' '' ~ MARTEN TRANSPORT SITE Proposed Property Line per Exhibit A of Purchase Agreement \ ```~. Exhibit A ~~~ ,,, ~~ o ~; ~, ,, ~, ~ ~ ~~ ~~, ~ ~ ~~ a ~ ~ a ~ , ~•° t ~; ,f ~~' 1 ~ V'. 1` •~ 1 1 . , I, , ti ti II i~ ~ 't ~• 1 5 R~1 i I ~ I ~ I ~ 1 '' ~ `~• .,. ~.~ •k ,I i r f ~ ~r" ~ . ~, ~ ~ ~ rl 1•, ( '~ I 'I ~ ~, •~ r r ~ `•b i~"•` •~~` f,• ~` l is •~ 1 4'~• •R. r~ r.`~~. •R ` ~u ~• 4 . M1. ~• y 1 ~ 1 1 I ~ J~r `I ' ~ ~ ~~ r J r• ~~ , ~J. ~ ~~ r. a~~ ~ ~ J + ~ r • 1~ ~ !~ ~"~ti ~• . •~. ~~~ ~ ~ 1 r 1 ~~~ i~~' JT.~~~. L ~ I I~ 'I ' y ~ i ~ ~t~~ ~ ( ~ ~~~ y , f .'~ti ~ ' • ~ ~ - ~~~~ ~1 i ~ I 1 .. .,. ., ,rl r w' C ... ... ' R ~ ~' - ~ ~ i i y~ j~ 1 ~ 6 ~~~ r •I /~ ~ 4^ Tf y ' 14 '.: ', , ~ ,~ ~,• ~ .;. ~ ~ ~ ;.,r. .~ ~ r 99 ti~1 ~ ~ ~ • I 41 ~• ', ~~ ~i ~ , , r ~ ~ _~ ;1ti ~~ • ! '+ ~~' • ~ ~ 1 •~ I . 1 7 a s ~` •ti' ~~~ .r'~ `~ ~ w~, w . 9 ~ ,, `~ ~ i /~ ~ •~~ •1 . ~t A '•'~~ ~~1 ~~ ~ ; , ' , p 5~ r. , ~ ~ titi•~ 4 ~ 'wx •~+ • C" ~ , '~ ~ +• ~ yMr ~~ •~ j 5 ~Y ~ '~ i ~„ d ~~R ~ ~ i~~ 1+ h ~ ~ r ... .. / ti i ~~ RRR f ' ~, A ~ ~ y a O""+ ~ ~ R `fi ~,• ~~` 0 ' ~ r ~,~ r' r .~ ~ ~ }, G ~ ~ ~) I r ~' ~~' ~ 1 ~ ! 1a~ ~S 1~ • ~ i r ~ r" ~. ~~r ~ / Jr A~ II ~ • ~J. M ~ ~ ~i ~I~ ` ~+lf~~' ~ ~ ?R ~ f 1 ~. ~ ~ ~~ ~ """-~~- ~ ~ ~ _,~-""" ~ t .~'. ~ `' f X ~ ~, ~ . ,.r -- '~ ~ , ~ "• ~] I I ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~~ +~'. 1~ ~. ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~, ~ ~ ~~ '~ ~ ti i ti ~ e~ j. ~ '~ 4 ~~ ~ ~ ~~, ._-, i ti ~ ( ~ ~ ~~. ~~ ~~ ~ 4.,,~ ~ i b ~~., ~ ~ , ~ _ :~ ~ ~ ~~, ,~ ~. ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ -~. ~~ i '~ ~ ~ '1 ~ , ~ ~° ~ ~ ~. ~~~ ~. ; ~ -~ ~ ~ ~. ~' ~' ~~ ^` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~" ~ ~ ,~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~, ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~, ~ ~ -,~ , -, -.,.~~~~ !~ m~4lV' 0~ ~~~Oa~m ~ ?~~ a n~~ Q 0 _ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~i ~1 ~ r- ~~ ~~'~ ~~ • ~ RT ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _~ -~"' ~ ~ ~~ ~a --~- ~ I'VIL ~ H t~~ ~ I~ rum ~ ~~ ~ - ~~ ~ ~ ~~~r~, ~~a a ~v~ ° ~~'~ ~. ~. bM~lr~1l~. arrmawrw ~aawnc ~ ~, ., •rr ~. rwa~r ~~~s~0w~r~~r~ } CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ~~, Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.22. Subject: Transfer $6,000 from the Bermuda District Improvement Fund to the Chesterfield County School Board to Fund Construction of Dugouts on Two Baseball Fields at Thomas Dale High School County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Transfer $6,000 from the Bermuda District Improvement Fund to the Chesterfield County School Board to fund construction of dugouts on two baseball fields at Thomas Dale High School. Summary of Information: Supervisor Jaeckle has requested the Board to transfer $6,000 from the Bermuda District Improvement Fund to the Chesterfield County School Board to fund construction of dugouts on two baseball fields at Thomas Dale High School. The County can legally transfer public funds to the School Board to make capital improvements on County property for a public purpose in accordance with both the Virginia Public Procurement Act and School Board purchasing polices. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget & Management 0425:85608.1 Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? e t ~h T rya 2. If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws toapplication.) ~lA 3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? 4. Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? --~Sd1~ s~e¢. o~~-~-achec~ --r~~~o~i~~ pat k s F sec //rea-~ o~,+r~~} ~~ac,n,+~ srihc~'s ~ 5~ a~-l~ac~,¢~ Cau n~ Schao~S 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Is the organization non-profit? Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes IVo Yes No Yes No Od07:23380.1 Page 2 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? 1U7a8 t-~amlinWcty r ~w_ ~ 383 ~ 9. What is the telephone number, fax number 804 - ~ 17 "' $/02~' lGt'll~ e-mail address of the applicant? $[~q. - 7~~ - ~-b ~ ~~~' Kei fh • ~'~ Lo l~r~~y~ll. cola Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairmaMdirector or vice-chairm~rof the organisation. r Signat re Title (if signing on behalf of an organization) Ke`i~ ~. 7ogna Printed Name ~/ ~" ~~. ~ ~ Date 0407:23380.1 ~~~~~~=~~~-~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY J .` F :5 ' `~ l ~'~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 4 SY 5~ 1$ ~' i~ ~° F i ~~ ~ _ ~~ ~r AGENDA ,~ ~ , -- 5 ~~, ~, 41 Se .~'~y ~ ~~ F . .,y,..- ~ -,:. Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 9.A. Subject: Developer Water and Sewer Contracts County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Request The Board of Supervisors has authorized the County Administrator to execute water and/or sewer contracts between county and developers where there are no county funds involved. The report is submitted to Board members as information. Summary of Information: The following water and sewer contracts were executed by the County Administrator: 1. Contract Number: 05-0421 Project Name: Genito Towns General Location: Genito Road north of Hull Street Road Developer: Genito Townes, LLC Contractor: Excalibur Construction Corporation Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $104,790.00 Wastewater Improvements - $121,896.00 District: Clover Hill Preparers William 0. Wright Title: Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No ~~~~.~s CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 4 AGENDA Summary of Information: (Continued) 2. Contract Number: 06-0161 Project Name: Hy-Tech Property Services, Inc. General Location: 3939 Hendricks Road Developer: Chimento Properties, LLC Contractor: R.M.C. Contractors, Incorporated Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $18,895.00 Wastewater Improvements - $5,415.00 District: Dale 3. Contract Number: 07-0173 Project Name: Queenspark, Section N - (A Resubdivision of Queenspark, Section M, Lots 1,2,3 and 6 General Location: Robious Crossing Drive and Robys Way Developer: Pinifer Park Properties, LLC Contractor: R.M.C. Contractors, Inc. Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $35,795.00 Wastewater Improvements - $95,145.00 District: Midlothian 4. Contract Number: 07-0383 Project Name: The Sanctuary at Watermill, Section C General Location: Thorncrag Lane Developer: Douglas R. Sowers and Susan S. Sowers Contractor: Piedmont Construction Company, Incorporated Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $8,526.50 Wastewater Improvements - $16,623.85 District: Matoaca .,`a,, i CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page3of4 Summary of Information: (Continued 5. Contract Number: 07-0384 Project Name: Rountrey, Section 3 General Location: Woolridge Road at Simonsbath Road Developer: Douglas R. Sowers and Susan S. Sowers Contractor: Piedmont Construction Company, Incorporated Contract Amount: Water Improvements - $242,073.50 Wastewater Improvements - $283,476.15 District: Matoaca 6. Contract Number: Project Name General Location: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 7. Contract Number: Project Name General Location: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 09-0119 American Family Fitness Center Chalkley Road and Route 10 Sauer Properties, Incorporated Maidens Contracting, LLC Water Improvements - Bermuda 10-0136 Autumn Grove, Section C Autumn Point Drive at Koufax Drive Autumn Leaf, LLC G. N. Tunnell, Incorporated Water Improvements - Bermuda $75,800.79 $5,000.00 ~~..~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 4 of 4 AGENDA Summary of Information: (Continued) 8. Contract Number: 10-0229 Project Name: Sycamore Church Sanitary Sewer Extension General Location: 510 Coalfield Road Developer: Sycamore Presbyterian Church Contractor: G. L. Pruett, Incorporated Contract Amount: Wastewater Improvements - $16,478.50 District: Midlothian Q~09.:?8 O CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 9.B. Sub'ect: Report on Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects, District Improvement Funds, and Lease Purchases County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Acceptance of attached report. Summary of Information: Preparers James J. L. Stegmaier Title: County Administrator Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No # ~~~,~ ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GENERAL FUND BALANCE Budgeted Ending Balances February 23, 2011 of General Fund Budgeted Expenditures* FY2008 $50,945,000 7.5% FY2009 $53,495,000 7.7% FY2010 $53,495,000 8.1 FY2011 $53,495,000 8.3% *The County's financial policy states the targeted fund balance level is 7.5%. Qflo19~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS February 23, 2011 Board Meeting Date Description Amount Balance FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2009 4/15/2009 FY2010 Budgeted Addition $14,021,400 $19,632,088 4/15/2009 FY2010 Capital Projects (14,021,400) 5,610,688 4114/2010 Substitute funding for Circuit/General District Courthouse (832,500) 4,778,188 expansion. FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2010 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2010 4/15/2010 FY2011 Budget Addition 13,169,200 4/15/2010 FY2011 Capital Projects (12,962,600) 5/26/2010 FY2011 Part of Sports Quest funding (206,600) 8/25/2010 Replacement generator for the IST building (290,400) 8/25/2010 Replacement funding to complete projects at Clover Hill (340,000) Sports Complex 11/17/2010 Renovations and Additions to the Manchester Volunteer (120,000) Rescue Squad (MVRS) Project 17,947,388 4,984,788 4,778,188 4,487,788 4,147,788 4,027,788 Q'~C1a.91 Q z F w O w '" U ,~' e°~ A ~ N I.W.I O L a V ~ ~ ~ ~ F ~ -~i rr U F D ~ ~ p ~~" ~ ~ „ d v ~ L R R ~ ~Q C CO O "O Vl = bD y Q rr M N N ~ ar Q ~~ S+i L 7 ~ w ~ O W vii vMi oho ~ i~ ' O~ l~ l ~ N ~n _~ ~ ~ N M N M 69 O O O O O ~ O O O O O 00 00 00 00 M l~ N N N O M `O ~D ~ ~ O N N ... ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ d Vi L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ti ~ M ~ M ~ M ~ M ~ M ~ ~ Imo"' M M M M M L L M M M M M ~ L ~ ~L R p., U as ;fl R .. ~ R ~ = ~. ~ c e~ .a A o0 U A ~ ~ U Date Bean. Descri tion 04/99 Public Facility Lease -Juvenile Courts Project (Refinanced 10/10) Ol/Ol Certificates of Participation - BuildingConstruction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems 03/03 Certificates of Participation -Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation 03104 Certificates of Participation -Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems 10/04 Cloverleaf Mall Redevelopment Project 12/04 Energy Improvements at County Facilities 05105 Certificates of Participation -Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and Equipping; Acquisition/Installation of Systems 05/06 Certificates ofParticipation -Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and Equipping; AcquisitionlInstallation ofSystems 08/07 Certificates of Participation -Building Expansion/Renovation, Equipment Acquisition TOTAL APPROVED AND EXECUTED PENDING EXECUTION Description None Prepared by Accounting Department January 31, 2011 SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES APPROVED AND EXECUTED (lriainal Date $16,100,000 13,725,000 6,100,000 21,970,000 16,596,199 1,519,567 14,495,000 11,960,000 22,220,000 124 685 766 Ends O 1/20 11/21 11/23 11/24 10/11 12/17 11 /24 Outstanding RalanrP $7,185,000 6,170,000 3,860,000 15,130,000 16,596,199 1,023,579 9,350,000 11/24 7,945,000 11/27 18,710,000 ~85~969,778 AnnrnvPrl la'fD0"4,°3 February 23, 2011 Speakers List Afternoon Session 1. Mr. L. J. McCoy Mr. Frank Cardella 3. 4. 5. McCoy, Jr. ident Cheryl Biggins PresideiR e Bonapatie retary as Clark usurer . L.. Pollard ~plin Chesterfield County. Branch NAACP Wednesday, February 23, 2011 To the honorable Chairman of the Board Mr. Art Warren, Vice Chair Ms. Dorothy Jaeckle, board members, and County Administrator Mr. James J. L. Stegmaier, my name is L. J. McCoy, Jr., president of the Chesterfield NAACP. I recently heard a woman say, 'I have a house and property in the western area of Virginia, and another home in central Vrginia. On Election Day, I vote in the morning in the western area, s and then I'd travel to my central area home and vote there in the evening.' I'm not sure if this is legal, but I believe that the 'one person, one vote', scenario had been compromised. The 2010 census has defined the common trend of the county's population, ethnic diversity, and voter distribution. While development and growth has changed the balance of the population since the 2000 census, the task of dividing up the county into balanced voting districts lies with our legislators. The Department of Justice no longer has to place the cross hairs on this county, since Chesterfield operates welt•within the guidance of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The county has also survived challenges where issues on voting gained national attention. Yet, during this season of redistricting, I am convinced that Packing Districts, Cracking Districts, and Stacking Districts should not be an issue. I applaud your efforts and your concerns in giving the citizens an opportunity in attending the recent community forums where vital _infortnation was disseminated. Now, I would hope, and expect that every reasonable effort would also be made to keep concerned citizens like myself, informed of the redistricting changes we can expect that you will submit to our General Assembly. . Thank you. Respect Ily, L J. McCo , r ranch President 2417 Osbo a d. Chester, VA 23831 (804) 241-7866 P.O. Box 246 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 804 768-0662 wvvw.chesterfieldnaacp.com Address to the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors February 23, 2011 Frank Cardella, NBCT President, Chesterfield Education Association Chairman Warren, Members of the Board, Mr. Stegmaier: Three years ago the five members of this board were elected to guide the progress and evolution of this County. At the time that each of you ran for your current office, life was good in Chesterfield County: home values were high, the school system flourished, people were moving to Chesterfield in droves, yet citizen support for government was not as strong as one might expect given the high quality of life indicators. Accusations of mismanagement and collusion with the "Good `Ole Boy Network'' prompted voters to seek candidates who promised to make changes in the way government responded to the needs of citizens. You promised a more nimble government, a more transparent government, a government that prioritized planned development over reactionary spending. As the saying goes, I guess "two out of three ain't bad." No one can fault you for the economic crisis that has engulfed our county, state, nation, and yes, world. And yet you have all claimed at one time or another during the past three years to have presaged this situation, and to have committed from the beginning to reshaping Chesterfield government to better match the economic profile of its citizens, to creating a service portfolio based on the needs and wants of those citizens rather than the amount of revenue available in yearly snapshot projections. In such a system you would establish the cost of tl~ providing those services first, then adjust revenue streams to the minimum levels required to meet the demand. You have used the term "right-sizing government" to describe your vision, but in reality you have continued the practices of past Boards, fitting the service levels to the revenue, not the other way round. For three years you have asked the County Administrator's office to direct cuts to most departments prior to advertising the various tax rates that could allow the community the option of supplying more revenue to maintain or even increase service levels in desired departments, such as public safety, health services, and education. You're not walking your own talk; you're Fox News: more opinion than fact. Last Tuesday Mr. Warren addressed the Chesterfield Business Council at its monthly networking meeting and proudly touted this Board's fiscal restraint, criticizing the federal government's spending programs-programs which return a fair amount of money to Chesterfield County to help those people whom citizens making above the median income don't generally recognize to exist. Mr. Warren then asked the audience, mostly wearing suits and representing the management perspective of businesses, whether anyone really felt there had been a reduction in the level of service in the County as a result of the Board's funding reductions to core services. When only two of us raised our hands he remarked that we were "brave." I'm not sure whether the implication was that disagreeing with people who make more money than I do takes courage, or that telling the truth does. Either way the comment was inappropriate from a leader who claims on his candidate website that "it is our responsibility to protect and further enhance" the qualities that make Chesterfield great for all of its citizens, not just the ones who can best afford them. I wonder, Mr. Warren, if you had asked that question at the Pay Day Loan Address to the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors February 23, 2011 office, or at Wal-Mart, or McDonalds, do you think the distribution of hands in the air would have been the same? May I recommend you field test that question at an elementary school faculty meeting next time? The CEA, which represents over 2000 educators who are also citizens, recommends full funding of the School Board's budget as presented by the Superintendent, with the inclusion of Federal Jobs Bill monies as intended, as a supplement to state and local dollars, not a substitution. With a new comprehensive plan for Chesterfield County on the way, I do hope that the next iteration of the Board of Supervisors will actually walk the talk of shaping revenue to meet need, whether that requires decreasing or increasing citizen contributions. ~~ ~, ' - ; t ;i `~`, ~ ins CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 14.A. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Mr. Earl E. Shaffer Jr. for His Outstanding Accomplishments in Music Education County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Ms. Durfee requests that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached resolution recognizing the accomplishments of Mr. Earl Shaffer Jr. Summary of Information: Mr. Earl Shaffer Jr. is the band director at Cosby High School. He has been inducted into the National High School Band Directors Hall of Fame in recognition of his excellent professionalism and leadership in the field of music education. Preparers Don Kappel Title: Director, Public Affairs Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ~~~q ~,~ RECOGNIZING MR. EARL E. SHAFFER JR. FOR HIS OUTSTANDING ACCOMPLISHMENTS IN MUSIC EDUCATION WHEREAS, Mr. Earl E. Shaffer Jr. is the band director at Cosby High School in Chesterfield County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, Mr. Shaffer is in his 31St year as an educator, and has taught in Chesterfield County schools since 1989; and WHEREAS, in that time, Mr. Shaffer has led hundreds of students to a greater appreciation of music, and to a greater level of teamwork, self-confidence and a strong work ethic; and WHEREAS, he has enabled the students with whom he has worked to entertain and thrill parents, siblings, other family members and the public-at-large with a wide variety of musical presentations; and WHEREAS, he has engendered in his students and others a strong appreciation for the arts; and WHEREAS, Mr. Shaffer's outstanding leadership and professional expertise have been recognized by the High School Band Directors National Association; and WHEREAS, Mr. Shaffer has been inducted into the National High School Band Directors Hall of Fame; and WHEREAS, the National High School Band Directors Hall of Fame has only approximately 40 members out of all the high school band directors nationwide; and WHEREAS, Mr. Shaffer's accomplishments bring credit to him, Cosby High School, Chesterfield County Public Schools and to the county overall; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to recognize Mr. Shaffer's significant accomplishments in the field of music education. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 23rd day of February 2011, publicly recognizes the exemplary achievements of Mr. Earl Shaffer Jr., and extends best wishes for continued success. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to Mr. Shaffer, and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. c~~~a.~s ~, ~~ ~ _ ~~ ft~ s,,, st. '~;'' lr,, '+:.~ . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 14.B. Subject: Resolution Recognizing the 2010 Cosby High School Girls Varsity Cheerleading Team for Its Outstanding Accomplishments and Excellent Representation of Chesterfield County During the 2010 Season County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Ms. Durfee requests that the Board of Supervisors commend and recognize the Cosby High School Girls Varsity Cheerleading Team for its superior achievements and representation of Chesterfield County. Summary of Information: Under the guidance and direction of Coach Catharine waiters and her staff, the Cosby Titans were undefeated during the 2010 competitive season. The Titans were the Dominion District Champions, Central Region Champions and were the Group A.A.A State Champions. Preparers Michael S. Golden Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director, Parks and Recreation ^ No RECOGNIZING THE 2010 COSBY HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS VARSITY CHEERLEADING TEAM FOR ITS OUTSTANDING REPRESENTATION OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY WHEREAS, participation in high school sports has long been an integral part of Chesterfield County's educational, physical and emotional development for students; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Catharine Merritt Walters, head coach of the Cosby High School Competitive Cheer Team, completed her sixteenth year of coaching cheerleading and her tenth victory in Virginia competitions; and WHEREAS, under the guidance and direction of Coach Walters and Coach Vanessa Epps, the 2010 Titan cheerleading Team finished an undefeated competitive season; and WHEREAS, The Cosby cheerleading Team was featured in the national magazine Inside cheerleading, as one of the top ten squads in the nation for their accomplishments in community service for National School Spirit Day; and WHEREAS, the Lady Titans were the Dominion District Champions; and WHEREAS, the Lady Titans were the Central Region Champions; and WHEREAS, the Lady Titans cheerleading Team competed in the State Cheer Competition and were the Group AAA State Champions; and WHEREAS, the Cosby cheerleading Team was the first ever Dominion District Team or Central Region Team to win the Group AAA State Championship; and WHEREAS, the team members include Amanda Rosswog, co-captain; Taylor Poe, co-captain; Katelyn Turner, co-captain; Kristen Carden, co-captain; Erin Collins, Janine Coppola, Megan Dunleavy, Caity Anne Elkins, Nicole Migliazzo, Kaila Wood, Sarah Beamon, Breanna Glass, Maddie Hicks, Kendal Kilby, Morgan Lawman, Elizabeth Lilly, Lindsey Shannon, Lacie Walls, Rachael Block, Chrissy Maguire, Rachel Simpson, Sommer Walton, Ashton Ritchie, and managers Daniella Baird, Rebecca Schuetz, and Katie Titus. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 23rd day of February 2011, publicly recognizes the 2010 Cosby High School Girls Varsity cheerleading Team for its outstanding representation of Chesterfield County, commends the team on its commitment to excellence and sportsmanship, and expresses best wishes for continued success. Q~ ~~.°17 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 14.C. Sub'ect: Resolution Recognizing Mr. Alec Kade Gendron Upon Attaining the Rank of Eagle Scout Coun Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff has received a request for the Board to adopt a resolution recognizing Mr. Alec Kade Gendron, Troop 2822, sponsored by Bethia United Methodist Church, upon attaining the rank of Eagle Scout. Mr. Gendron, a Matoaca District resident, will be present at the meeting, accompanied by members of his family, to accept the resolution. Preparers Janice Blakley Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Clerk to the Board ^ No # ~~i~1.98 WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered by Congress in 1916; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build character, provide citizenship training and promote physical fitness; and WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of skills including leadership, service and outdoor life, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law, Mr. Alec Kade Gendron, Troop 2822, sponsored by Bethia United Methodist Church, has accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by only four percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader in society, Alec has distinguished himself as a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 23rd day of February 2011, hereby extends its congratulations to Mr. Alec Kade Gendron and acknowledges the good fortune of the county to have such an outstanding young man as its citizen. OflOa.:~9 February 23, 2011 Speaker's List Evening Session #1 (Following Presentation of Resolutions) 1. Mr. Daren Gardner 2. Ms. Sharon Murphy 3. 4. 5. Evening Session #2 (End of the Evening Agenda) 1. Mr. George Emerson 2. 3. 4. 5. ~c~reh ~a~o(he~' Hated ~~ ~ The History of Sustainable Development Connecting the Dots Prepared by Va Campaign for Liberty Donna Holt Executive Director www.CampaignForLiberty.com/VA The History of Sustainable Development - Connecting the Dots The concept of sustainable development arose after the X974 United Nations adoption of a Declaration for the establishment of a "New International Economic Order"'. The document was written by developing countries and called for: • The regulation of multi-national Corporations • Authority to nationalize foreign property • Authority to establish commodity monopolies • The transfer of technology and technical assistance The document showed clearly that the delegates to the U.N. General Assembly accepted the idea that governments should virtually control the economy and that equity was the primary objective. This document was largely ignored by developed nations. But many of these U.N. Delegates took these ideas to other U.N. conferences. For example, the X976 U.N. conference on Human Settlements (Habitat I)2. Here is an excerpt from the Preamble: "Land...cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also the principle instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth, and therefore, contributes to social injustice..." This preamble sets the stage for 65 pages of very specific land use recommendations. Among the many recommendations are: • A-1. Redistribute population in accord with resources • D-i. Government must control the use of land to achieve equitable distribution of resources • D-2. Control land use through zoning & land-use planning • D-3. Excessive profits from land use must be recaptured by government • D-4. Public ownership of land should be used to exercise urban and rural land reform • D-5.Owner rights should be separated from development rights which should be held by a public authority. This established the direction of the U.N.'s recommendation. Among the signers on behalf of the United States were Carla Hills, Secretary of HUD and William Reilly, Conservation Foundation and later the Administrator for the EPA. Also in attendance were: • Nine agencies of the federal government • Sierra Club • National Audubon Society • Friends of the Earth • Conservation Foundation • League of Women Voters The term "sustainable development" entered the vocabulary during the ~99o's and has virtually permeated every facet of American life. The term was first defined in the United Nations i98~ report of the World Commission on Environment & Development called "Our Common Future". The Commission was chaired by Gro Harlem Brundtland who was also Vice- Chair of the World Socialist Party. s Our Common Future defines sustainable development to be: "Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." Sustainable development is illustrated to depict the proper balance between social equity, the environment, and economic development. Note that what is called sustainable is the perfect balance between policies related to these three all-encompassing areas of life. The United Nations General Assembly asked the World Commission on Environment and Development, also called the Brundtland Commission, to "...propose long term Strategies for achieving sustainable development by the year 200o and beyond... ". Five years later the plan called Agenda 21 ti~as unveiled at the 1992 Conference on Environment & Development. The conference was chaired by Maurice Strong who was also a member of the Brundtland Commission.4 In it's 4o chapters, Agenda 21 addresses virtually every aspect of life. Each chapter presents many policy recommendations that member nations are expected to adopt. Some of the more important chapters are: 5. Demographics & Sustainability ~. Human Settlements (the foundation for "sustainable communities") 10. Planning & Management of Land i8. Management of Water 30. The role of Business & Industry 38. International Mechanisms & Institutions (are seen to be the coordinators of worldwide sustainable development) Agenda 21 calls for the creation of: "National strategies, plans, policies, and processes which are crucial in achieving a sustainable world." Note: The ratification of the Biodiversity Treaty, Agenda 21, was never voted on by Senate after Dr. Michael Coffman presented this map of the proposed development of the "wildlands" under Agenda 21 in the United States.s Six months after his inauguration, President Bill Clinton issued Executive Order #12852 which created the President's Council On Sustainable Development (PCSD) on June 29 1993• The Council's Membership included: • Twelve Cabinet-level Federal Officials • Jonathan Lash, Pres. World Resources Institute • John Adams, Ex. Dir. National Resources Defense Council • Dianne Dillon-Ridgley, Pres. Zero Population • Michelle Perrault, International V.P., Sierra Club • John C. Sawhill, Pres. The Nature Conservancy • Jay D. Hair, Pres. World Conservation Union (IUCN) • Kenneth L. Lay, CEO, Enon Corporation • William D. Ruckelshaus, Chm., Browning-Ferris Industries & former EPA Administrator Their purpose was to translate the recommendations set forth in Agenda 21 into public policy administered by the federal government. They created the American version of Agenda 21 called "Sustainable America - A New Consensus".6 The ideas that came out of the U.N. conferences mentioned above, are emerging in public policy. The Consensus Process is the most important dimension to the implementation of sustainable development policies. Using the consensus process, an initiator carefully selects members of the affected group to participate on a decision making committee. The decision making committee never votes. Consensus is the process by which objections to the proposal are extinguished. This is contrary to the democratic process in which the affected group elects representatives. The representatives debate and then vote. The affected group then abides by the decisions. If the affected group is dissatisfied with the decision, they can elect new representatives to reflect their wishes. Using the consensus process, the affected group has no voice in choosing the decision makers. Sustainable development was brought to America when President Clinton (initiator) initiated the President's Council on Sustainable Development. This decision-making committee began with Agenda 21 as its proposal. Its goal was to translate Agenda 21 into public policy. An early achievement of the council was the development of 16 "We Believe" statements among which is No. 8.' "We need a new collaborative decision process that leads to better decisions, more rapid change, and more sensible use of human, natural, and financial resources in achieving our goals." This new collaborative process is the "consensus process". The PCSD operated from 1993 -1999• Their first major publication was "Sustainable America - A New Consensus". It contained more than 15o policy recommendations taken directly from Agenda 21. At the eleventh meeting of the council, after the recommendations had been developed, then Secretary of the Dept. Of Commerce, Ron Brown, said that his agency could implement 6~% of the recommendations administratively using rule making authority. Other department secretaries reported similar numbers. The recommendations covered a wide range of public policies. Among the most important are land use policies. Sustainable America says: "Private land use decisions are often driven by strong economic incentives that result in several ecological or aesthetic consequences... The key to overcoming it is through public policies...(p.112)." The 199o's saw an expansion of government control of land use. In 1997, the federal government already owned about i/3 of all the land in America. State and local governments owned another io%. The federal government designated and expanded 21 National Monuments, designated 43 million acres of "roadless" areas, and appropriated millions in grants to states and local governments and land trusts for the purpose of acquiring more private property. These activities were promoted by the land management agencies, all members of the PCSD. Millions in grants were awarded to the American Planning Association between 1997 - 2000. The EPA and other agencies issued millions more in challenge grants to local governments and organizations for "visioning" projects. During the i99o's there emerged a rash of visioning projects in towns and cities across the nation. They were typically called something like "Yourtown 2020". They were all the result of the PCSD and funded by grants by an agency of the government who was a member of the PCSD. The EPA, for example, would issue challenge grants for visioning projects to NGO's (non- government organizations) and to local governments. The grant recipient would designate an initiator who would select the visioning council. Those selected would be known in advance to support the goals of the initiator and in many cases, stands to gain financially from the implementation of the goals. To spread this process across the country, the EPA coordinated a Smart Growth Network consisting of dozens of non-government organizations which included: • American Planning Association • The Conservation Fund • The Natural Resources Defense Council • The Sierra Club In each of the communities where visioning councils were established, their starting proposal was the recommendations of the PCSD. Their objective was to: • Present PCSD recommendations as local goals for the community • Through the consensus process, remove any objections that might arise • Develop specific recommendations to achieve goals The result became the "Yourtown 202o Plan of Action". This process takes typically 12 - i8 months during which the local initiator begins to issue press releases and to involve local media to introduce the idea of building a sustainable community. The idea is to build so much public support for the sustainable community as defined by the "Yourtown 202o Plan of Action", that elected officials will have no choice but to rubber stamp it. Funding continues to flow from government agencies to local governments and non- government organizations for the purpose of implementing sustainable development. Hundreds of NGO's were funded to launch the "visioning process" in communities across the country. An NGO (facilitator) will begin the visioning process by carefully selecting representatives from various stakeholder groups (en`~ironment, business, education, agriculture, government) to serve as the ~~isioning committee or council. Those chosen to serve on this council are well-vetted and known to support the goals of sustainable development. The visioning process consists of series of meetings in which a trained facilitator leads the group of stakeholder representatives, to suggest goals for the community that will create the best possible future. These suggestions are typically written on a chalkboard, then organized into categories. Since Agenda 21's 4o chapters and the hundreds of policy recommendations from the PCSD cover virtually every aspect of human existence, the visioning councils' ideas are easily organized into categories addressed by sustainable development documents. Once the goals are identified and organized, the next step is to develop consensus. Consensus is NOT agreement. Consensus is the absence of expressed opposition. Testimony by recent attendees of such a meeting reveals that objections are put off indefinitely by the facilitator. The questions are never answered, the objections are never made public, and all are dismissed, ignored, or discredited. Agenda 21 is the Bible for Sustainable Development as outlined in its four sections: Section I: Social and Economic Dimensions (8 Chapters) Section II: Conservation and Management of Resources for Development (i4 Chapters) Section III: Strengthening the Role of Major Groups (1o Chapters) Section IV: Means of Implementation (8 Chapters) The PCSD's Sustainable America is a revised version of Agenda 21 that focuses directly on transforming domestic policy to implement the recommendations of Agenda 21. To bring about the perfect balance between the environment, the economy, and social equity (redistribution of wealth) in all developments. Ironically, most of the people involved with the process have never heard of Agenda 21 or Sustainable America. But the sponsoring NGO or agency knows exactly what it is and what his role is in implementing its policies. That's why every recommendation in the final land use development plan and the procedure for developing the plan can be traced back to the recommendations in Agenda 21 and Sustainable America. ICLEI, the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives8, is an international association of local governments as well as national and regional local government organizations who have made a commitment to sustainable development. ICLEI provides technical consulting, training, and information services to build capacity, share knowledge, and support local government in the implementation of sustainable development at the local level. Their basic premise is that locally designed initiatives can provide an effective and cost-efficient way to achieve local, national, and global sustainability objectives. There are 609 dues-paying members (counties/cities) of ICLEI in the United States. There are 18 members (counties/cities) in Virginia.9 ICMA, International City/County Management Association, is an organization of professional local government leaders building sustainable communities worldwide.'° ICMA provides technical and management assistance, training, and information resources in the areas of performance measurement, ethics education and training, community and economic development, environmental management, technology, and other topics to its members and the broader local government community. The American Planning Association is one of many members of the PCSD. They partner with ICLEI & ICMA in the implementation of sustainable development. The APA published "Managing Growth and Development in Virginia: A Review of the Tools Available to Localities"" The Renaissance Planning Group12 is an urban planning firm. They played a critical role in Florida's "Forever Program"13. The Forever Program is Florida's premier conservation and recreation lands acquisition program. Florida Forever is the largest public land acquisition program of its kind in the United States. With approximately 9.8 million acres of conservation land in Florida, more than 2.4 million acres were purchased under the Florida Forever and P2ooo programs. The Virginia Municipal League is a statewide association of city, town and county governments established to improve and assist local governments through legislative advocacy, research, education and other services. They have partnered with ICLEI `4 and other organizations to develop the "Go Green Virginia"15 initiative for to accelerate development of more environmentally friendly communities. In 200, the Virginia state legislature passed HB g2o2 mandating that counties with the prescribed growth rate establish high density urban development areas.i6 To date, 6~ counties in the Commonwealth of Virginia are required to establish "urban development areas"." The process and proposed land use planning that is being implemented, follows the very same policies called for in Agenda 2i's biodiversity plan. This requirement by the state forces local governments to compromise your private property through zoning measures called for in the Smart Growth program for sustainable development. The comprehensive land use plan is being steered by planning groups under the guise of "protecting the environment" through manipulation by facilitated stakeholder consensus councils. Though their meetings are open to the public, they are void of any public input. The predetermined outcome severely restricts land use and compromises private property ownership in an already distressed market. "Countryside" zoning creates buffer zones between high density urban areas and wilderness areas under the "wildlands project". The strict regulations and `countryside" zoning plans for rural areas devalues property and restricts the use of one's property to such a degree that the land owner is forced into taking advantage of government "conservation easement" relief that gives government total control over the property and essentially abolishes their private property rights forever. The Renaissance Planning Group is currently working with APA and ICMA to implement the policies of Agenda 21 and Sustainable America and to meet the requirements of HB 3202 in Virginia. A closer look at the biodiversity map shows clearly the plans to lock away more than 50 % of Virginia's landscape into wilderness areas. i8 The Renaissance Planning Groups's most current project is the "vision and development of Chesterfield County's Comprehensive Land-Use Plan719. Their local stakeholder representative group is called the "steering committee". Videos of their "Steering Committee" meetings reveals that while the facilitator seems genuinely sincere in wanting to address concerns and answer questions that arise, he really never does.2O Their proposed zoning plan calls for 53,323 acres of countryside and i~,62i acres of countryside residential. Countryside would be designated as remaining rural indefinitely, requiring 25 acres to build one home. Countryside residential would require five acres to build a home. Together they represent 25 percent of Chesterfield. There are concerns that Chesterfield could run out of industrially zoned land and miss economic development opportunities. According to attorney Carrie Coyner, some acreage in the draft land-use plan is earmarked for industrial but is unusable because of the terrain or wetlands. "We're going to run out of industrial, and that's where the jobs are," she said. For its final meeting on Nov. 20, when the committee decides whether to endorse the draft countywide plan, Planning Director Kirk Turner said, "There won't be a formal vote taken. What the consultant will look for...is a general affirmation of the plan by the committee." Agenda 21 calls for environment and sustainable development principles to be put at the core of the curriculum K-12. There was a recent survey of the progress of "The Greening Virginia Program K-12" in 12 of the 134 school districts in Virginia21 as well as a report on Greening Virginia Colleges and Universities.22 Some of the questions on that survey are: •Do you incorporate sustainability into academic programs or curricula? •Do you have any gardens that are used for teaching purposes? •Do your students participate in school energy audit programs? •Has your school system received federal, state, or local recognition for energy efficiency or sustainability programs? The goal is to insure that our children, the leaders of the future, are well indoctrinated with sustainability practices. Greening Programs are at the core of the curriculum at every level of education nationwide as required by the policies set forth by the U.S. Department of Education in compliance with Agenda 21 and Sustainable America. Greening Virginia (sustainable development) Projects have become the focus in every aspect of our lives in Virginia.2s Private property is being acquired through incentives for "conservation easements" in Virginia. ~4 The largest conservation easement in Virginia history occurred in February of this year.Zs An average of ~8,~13 acres per year were protected from development in Virginia between 2001 and 2009. Between 2006 and 2009 alone, 46i,oi9 acres were placed under protection, well exceeding the 400,000-acre goal set for those four years. Now Virginia has a renewed goal for preser~~ing an additional 400,000 acres by 2oi4. The Commonwealth also participates in the Chesapeake Bay Program, a partnership focused on restoring the Bay and committing to specific land preservation and en~~ironmental goals. Among the many provisions of the Chesapeake 2000 agreement is an ambitious commitment to permanently preserve 20 percent of watershed lands in each participating state by 2oio. Available data shows that Virginia, as of June 2009, has preserved 2,54i,1o5 of its 13,83i,89o Chesapeake Bay watershed acres -- or 18.4 percent. President Obama's Chesapeake Bay Executive Order of 2009 conveys the full scope of on-the- ground and in-the water efforts the federal government will undertake between October ~, 2oio, and September 30, 2o1i in the 64000 square-mile Chesapeake Bay watershed.zb Government control of watersheds is one of many policy recommendation of Agenda 21. Among the regions, the Valley region had the largest percentage of preserved land in 2009, with 36.1 percent preserved. The Northern region had the second highest at 18.5 percent. The Southside region had the smallest percent of preserved land at 2.8 percent, followed by the Central region at 10.2 percent. 2' An Analysis of Metropolitan Markets done in 2008 reveals that Smart Growth (dense urban areas) has reduced the amount of affordable housing and has had a negative impact on job growth.2a The videos in the presentation called Taking Liberty US by Dr. Michael Coffman will help you better understand how private property is being abolished nationwide.29 Despite the Senate's refusal to ratify the Biodiversity Treaty in 1994 the Agenda 21 policies called for by the convention, are being implemented nationwide. No matter where you live, rest assured Agenda 21 policies are being implemented in your community. The global to local plan is to take the policies of the United Nations Agenda 21 brought to the United States and translated into policy for "Sustainable America" is now policy for "Yourtown 2020 Plan of Action". Rest assured that Yourtown 2020 Action Plan will have a negative impact on private property rights, economic prosperity, and will result in a regulatory taking of your land. Western states that are further along in the implementation of sustainable development have been negatively impacted by the: 1) Sharp increase in the cost of housing in urban areas - Revitalization plans in the higher density urban areas displaces many through gentrification and always results in sharp increases in the cost of housing. 2) Rationing of water, electricity & fuel -Higher density puts more strain on local resources. To meet the needs of these high density urban areas, regulations to restrict individual use of resources are imposed. These new regulations are also a requirement to receive federal funding made available for sustainable projects. Such restrictions would force the expensive retrofitting of a home in order to meet ones' daily need for water, electricity, and fuel. Many who could not afford such expensive upgrades to their homes were forced to leave their home and the community. 3) Higher property taxes and additional "unearned enrichment tax" -The new higher density development sharply increases the value of property, increasing the amount you pay in property taxes. You further stand to be assessed an "unjust enrichment tax". If you choose to stay in your home and it happens to be on one acre of land in an area that is rezoned as an urban development area that calls for 4 units per acre, you will be enriched by the increased value of your property as the direct result of this new zoning. In other western states, it is common practice to charge property owners who realized such enrichment an "unjust enrichment tax" in addition to the higher taxes assessed on their property at whatever rate was decided upon by the state legislature. 4) Decrease or total loss in value of property in rural areas - If you own a parcel of land in a rural area that is not yet developed, you may find that your land loses its entire value. For example, if you purchased a 5 acre parcel of land that has not yet been developed in an area that calls for 25 or more acres to build one home under the new zoning plan, your land would be deemed worthless. Don't be fooled by claims that you are grandfathered in if you purchased your land prior to new zoning requirements. Property owners are commonly denied building permits if they have less than the required acreage. In short, sustainable development policies can and will ultimately lead to the regulatory taking of land. If you are of the notion that you can successfully challenge these actions in court, think again. Any challenge in the court will prove very costly and will result in a cost that is far greater than you stand to gain even if you are successful, which few ever are. '. http ~//www un orgf ~ a/search/view doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/~2oi%28S-VI%2A 2. http ://habitat.igc.org /vancouver/vp-intr.htm 3. http ://w~n~v.un-docu ments.net/ocf-ov.htm 4. http ://wGti~-.un.org/ g ninfo/bp/en~~iro.html andhttp://w~~v.un.org/esafdsd~agenda2i/ e 5. http ://w~~~n~.vc4l.com /imagesjUs-~~~ildPub-Slidel.jug 6. http :/f clinton2.nara. gov/PCSD/Publications/TF Reports/amer-top.html '. httv : /Jclinton2.nara. gov/PCSD/Publications/TF Reports/amer-believe.html 8. http : / /~~n~-v.iclei.org /index_php?id=iclei-home 9. http ://ti~4~v.icleiusa. org/about-iclei/members member-list 10. httv ://icma.orgf en/ icma/home ". http ://apa~~ir ing ia.o rgjdocuments/legislation/Growth%2oTools%2oRevzsed%2oio- og final.pdf ''-. httv ://w~wv.citiesth atwork.com/our-stort~.aspx 13. http :///~ti~rw.dep.state.fl.us/lands/fl forever.htm 14 htty ://www.greenbiz.com/news/2oio/o8/26/iclei-usa-partners-virginia-group-foster- green er-cities#ixzzl4D clj o Sew ''. http :///~ti~n~-.go~reen va.or~/ 16. httv ://wtti~v.hb;~2o2.~1rginia.govfurbandevelopment.shtml ". http ://w~ti~-.hb32o2.~~irginia.gov/ndf/o~-24-o~%2oVACo-VML%2oland%2ouse %2os~rnpoisium.pdf 18. http ://w~-~~v.vc4l.co m/images/~~irgina.%2ow.%2o~~irginia.%2omaryland-Slide2.jpg 19. htt v//~ti~n~w.chester field.gov/CompPlan.aspx?id=io22i -'0. http ://www.chester field.gov/content~.aspx? id=118 43&ekmense1=c 58ofaZ_442 0 1i84~ 3 -'. http ://ti~~~.vsbn.or gfdocs/GreeningVA K-12 Schools Report2oo8.pdf zz. http ://w~ti-w.vsbn.or gfdocs/GreeningUniversities2oo~ FinalReport vo2.pdf z3, httv ://w~~.vsbn.or g/resources.shtml z4. http ://w~ti~v.dcr.virg inia.govjland conser~~ation/documents/lcartcl-vl.pdf and http:/ /~~~v.landtrustv a.or~/easement benefits.asp zs, http : //~~~Tw.nature. org/wherewework/northamerica/states/~~rginia/press/yress4~78.htm1 '6. http : //executiveord er.chesapealeba, ~~ net/ 27. htt ~:i/~~aperforms.virginia.gov/indicators/naturalResources/landPreservation.phu 28. http : / /~~•w.demogr aphia.com/dhi-us8.pdf 29. http :/I /takingliberty .us/ Agenda 21 Part III: Maryland County Abolishes Agenda 21 -now for the rest of the country ~ Energy and ... Page 1 of ~ Agenda 21 Part III: Maryland County Abolishes Agenda 21- now for the rest of the country ~a~ ~~ ~ ~~~-~ ~, .~- WEDNESDAY, 23 FEBRUARY 2011 06:45 JAMES SIMPSON ~'°~'et~Q~-('}'' The November elections marked a sea change in the political landscape at every level of govemment nationwide. ~ Right now, all eyes are focused on the Wisconsin standoff between Governor Scott Walker and the public tweets employee unions. But under the radar, completely overlooked by the mass media, is the unprecedented move retweet recently taken by newly-elected Carroll County, Maryland Commissioners Richard Rothschild, Robin 425 Frazier, Haven Shoemaker, Dave Roush and Doug Howard, who abolished the County's Office of Sustainability. They then voted unanimously to drop out of the UN's International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives snares (ICLEI). They are the first governmental organization to do sa snare Related Agenda 21 Reports • Agenda 21:Part I: A Global Economic Disaster in the Making • Agenda 21: Part II: Globalist Totalitarian Dictatorship Invading a Town near You • Agenda 21 UN: The History of Sustainable Development -Connecting the Dots • Sustainable Communities - A Transformation of Virginia • China's Ghost Cities: A Result of Agenda 21? For those unfamiliar with the sustainable development agenda, this might not seem like much, but it is huge. If you have been following my recent series on the subject, you will know that local Sustainability offices, under the auspices of the ICLEI's Locaf Governments for Sustainability, are the tiny, visible tip of the monstrous Agenda 21 sustainable development iceberg, the ultimate goal of which is to transform American society from the bottom up into a socialist ward of UN global governance. As of today, there are approximately 600 local governments in the US who have signed on to this Trojan Horse. Minus one. All the commissioners are to be commended for this bold decision. Predictably, the left is up in arms. The commissioners have already been challenged to a debate on their decision and the other side wants to bring in heavy hitters from the EPA and the Maryland Department of the Environment in an attempt to discredit the commission's earth shattering (figuratively) move. I think they took some skin. Richard Rothschild led the charge. He campaigned on this issue, framing it, appropriately, as a matter of private property rights. In an American Thinker article he co-wrote last summer with Scott Strzelczyk, he explained that: "Sustainability has less to do with the environment, and everything to do with economics. It is an attack on capitalism, and an attack on America's middle class lifestyle." Rich recently discussed Agenda 21 in a radio address. Listen here. This is the kind of leadership that has been sorely lacking at all levels of government and hopefully his example and that of his fellow commissioners will embolden more such individuals to step forward before it is too late. Following the election, Carroll County's sustainabiliry director saw the writing on the wall and opted for early retirement. He then began taking pot shots at the new commissioners in the local paper. After being party to the biggest attempted land http:l/w}ww.rightsidenews.com/2011022312907/life-and-science/energy-and-environment/agenda-2 l -pert-iii... 2/23/2011 Agenda 21 Part III: Maryland County Abolishes Agenda 21 -now for the rest of the country ~ Energy and ... Page 2 of 5 grab in the county's history under the "Smart Growth" banner, this clown had the gall to wonder aloud how anyone could believe a UN planning document marketed as "Smart Growth" could affect Carroll County, I have a suggestion for him: read the documents. Rich responded to these attacks with an in-depth explanation of Sustainable Development published in the local paper: Sustainability invokes government power to enforce activists' views of environmentalism. They want to replace farmers', ranchers' and other landowners' concept of stewardship with government-centric control. It merges environmentalism and socialism to expand government into every aspect of our lives, including land use, food production, housing, transportation, manufacturing, energy rationing and even health care. He identifies the ICLEI for what it really is: ...an organization with extreme beliefs on global warming that promotes United Nations' big-government socio-economic policies. The UN Millennium Papers caution activists not to mention the UN Agenda because of potential American backlash, and instruct, "So, we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management, or smart growth." Rich cites egregious examples of "sustainability: in practice: Sustainability disciples use euphemistic terms like "environmental justice," and collude with government to enforce oppressive regulations at any cost. Don't believe me? Google "EPA TMDL lawsuits" and see the list of activists that sue the EPA and obtain federal court opinions that embolden oppressive regulations. Why does the EPA advertise these lawsuits on its website? Ironically, every time the EPA loses to an environmental group, it grows stronger as courts direct the EPA to enforce. The courts have become unwitting accomplices to government overreach. One Marylandcounty faces $1.8 billion in regulatory mandates, possibly enough to push them to the brink of insolvency. In another bid for expansion, government auctions off imaginary carbon credits. The 2008 northeast auction raised $600 million in hidden taxes that are passed on to struggling families through higher utility costs. The words "sustainable development" deceitfully suggest environmental conservation, and people who focus on the slogans without reading the fine print come up with simplistic conclusions like "it's all about the environment." In reality, Agenda-21 based sustainability programs seek government control of land, labor and capital in order to promote "social justice". As documented in Part I of this series, buzzwords for socialism like "social justice," "collective," "equity," and "redistribution," are used throughout Agenda 21. If you study the documents that spawned Agenda 21, most written by prominent socialist leaders from around the world, it is clear that their key concerns are: 1. abolishing private property and redistributing it according to socialist goals worldwide, and 2. herding humans into small urban communities where, stripped of freedom and mobility, we will live and work according to government diktat. For example, the Millennium Project calls for a global tax on all countries to provide monies for developing and third world countries. "Environmental sustainability" is only one of eight Millennium Development Goals. The rest are a laundry list of anti-poverty and health programs; laudable goals maybe, but nothing to do with Chesapeake Bay pollution to say the least. Furthermore, these countries have received billions in aid from the U.S. and elsewhere for decades, but because they are usually run by corrupt dictators of one form or another, such aid serves only to prop them up, thereby perpetuating the problem rather than solve it. But they're socialists, so it's okay. More to the point, Dr. Michael Coffman's famous Agenda 21 "Wildlands" map reveals the endgame of Agenda 21: http:l/www.rightsidenews.com/2011022312907/life-and-science/energy-and-environment/agenda-2l-part-iii... 2/23/2011 Agenda 21 Part III: Maryland County Abolishes Agenda 21 -now for the rest of the country ~ Energy and ... Page 3 of 5 As Required by the UN Covention on Biological Divei UN and US Man and Biosphere Programs and World Vital Step in Attaining Sustainable Devi Thfs map was used In tfw Unksd States Ssnab to stop tl» nN ~ ~ ~ no human u~dors ~ { ; ,."~ BufferZones-Highly Regulated Use Border 21/L_a Paz Sidebar Agreement 1 of NAFTA-200 Mile Wide International ^ Military Reservations Agenda 21 is being implemented throughout the U.S., as the quiet work of the ICLEI finds its way into state law and county code. The following video reveals how it was pushed in rural Richland County, South Carolina, sold as a "Comprehensive Plan" called "Vision 20/20". Explained by state legislator Joe Neal - a Democrat- the video provides a diagram chillingly similar to the Wldlands map, limiting development to small urban centers and leaving rural communities to die on the vine. If rep. Neal's sincere appeal in this four minute video doesn't convince you, his full two hour presentation is available here. The Comprehensive Plan stalled in 2003 due to citizen resistance but passed in 2009. It calls for creation of "Urban Villages... in contrast with suburban sprawl and inefficient land use." Note the negative associations with "suburban sprawl." They will fix that. The Plan directs that, "Throughout the suburban areas infill deve/opment(emphasis added) should be a focus in residential, commercial and industrial areas, complementing and connecting the existing sprawl pattern. Housing should be varied at 4-8 units per acre... Underutilized commercial strips and big-box retail parcels can be divided and redeveloped into smaller blocks with street extensions and pedestrian-friendly designs." So if you moved to the suburbs to get some room, avoid urban crime and get better schooling for your kids, forget it. They're going to tell you how and where to live, because they deem single family suburban homes "unsustainable". The Richland County plan is similar to the description for "20 Minute Neighborhoods" advocated by the Mayor of Portland, Oregon. The official map looks eerily similar to Dr. Coffman's. The state of Virginia has gone all out in a similar effort. Virginia House Bill 3202, signed into law by Democrat governor Tim Kaine in 2007 with bi-partisan support, requires 67 counties and cities to create "Urban Development Areas" based on decennial population growth criteria. The UDAs must be able to accommodate that growth and must include features like "pedestrian friendly" design, mixed use housing and minimum housing densities that presume an urban landscape and encourage low-income subsidized housing. The buzzwords change, but the description is virtually identical to Richland County, South Carolina, Portland, Oregon, and countless other towns throughout America. http://www.rightsidenews.com/2011022312907/life-and-science/energy-and-environment/agenda-2 l -part-iii... 2/23/2011 Agenda 21 Part III: Maryland County Abolishes Agenda 21 -now for the rest of the country ~ Energy and ... Page 4 of 5 The despotic nature of these mandates undermines the entire concept of private property, a key goal stated prominently in Agenda 2/ documents. It removes decision making latitude from both property owners and local governments, and ruins property values, while completely changing the complexion and character of rural counties. Add to this the sheer lunacy of requiring vast new housing projects when mortgage foreclosures are just beginning to recover from all time high rates. Construction companies like the guaranteed business these mandates insure, a big reason why they enjoy bi-partisan support. But at what cost to our communities, our Constitution, our very way of life? Finally, there is another even more pernicious factor that may underline politicians' motivations to support this wholesale assault on private property. UDAs are supposed to accommodate ten to twenty years of population growth within each designated county. According to the Census Bureau, between 1990 and 2010, Virginia's population grew by about 2 million people. Over 25 percent of that population growth was due to an influx of Hispanics. The Hispanic population represented a mere 3 percent of Virginia's population in 1990, but since then has grown 300 percent, from 160,000 people to 632,000! In some cases, Hispanic population growth dwarfs all else. In Prince William County for example, in 1990 the Hispanic population was a modest 4 percent of the population: 9,662 people. Today it stands at 81,460, accounting for almost 40 percent of total population growth in the county! Between 2000 and 2010 Chesterfield County grew by 56,000 people. Of that total, 15,247, almost 30 percent, were Hispanic. For comparison, the white population only increased by 16,507 people. Whites represented 77 percent of the total population in 2000, Hispanics only 3 percent. The Hispanic population growth rate in Chesterfield Countybetween 1990 and 2010 was over 800 percent. These growth rates cannot be accounted for by births. Nationwide, the Hispanic population has grown by about 25 million since 1990. There are at least 12 million illegals in the U.S. currently, mostly Hispanics. So at a minimum, about half of the growth rate in the U.S. Hispanic population since 1990 is due to illegals. By demanding UDAs in counties with high population growth rates, the Virginia legislature is pandering to illegal immigrants. Doing so will change not only the character, but the voting preferences of its rural counties. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out who will get the majority of those votes if the Democrats manage to pass an amnesty law. With the various vote fraud strategies being employed by leftists nationwide, amnesty may not even be necessary. If they succeed here, redistricting will become irrelevant. This is another covert strategy embedded in Agenda 21, perhaps the most dangerous of all, that has so far flown completely under the radar. Although Carroll County's actions were not related to illegal immigration, the threat of dense low-income urbanized development around their rural towns in order to promote "social equity" was a factor. Rothschild said, "They talk about sustainability promoting `healthier and better balanced' neighborhoods. What do they mean? The practical result is that the county is burdened with people with no pattern of personal responsibility, people who do not share the values of the community, all for the sake of 'equity.' But the underlying purpose is to shift voting patterns from right to left." The Carroll Countycommissioners have taken a bold step in publicly calling out the ICLEI and Agenda 21, but their work has just begun. "We have our own rural agricultural diversity and it is on the endangered species list." Rothschild quipped. This is an issue custom made for Tea Parties. Agenda 21 is being implemented at the state and local level, where citizen activists have the most leverage. Tea Parties nationwide need to get behind this effort and bring the dangers of Agenda 21- based planning dogma to the attention of state and local governments everywhere. It is critical to educate, support and encourage sympathetic legislators at all levels of government and work furiously to oust legislators and bureaucrats who, for whatever reason, refuse to abandon this evil agenda. http://www.rightsidenews.com/20 l 1022312907/life-and-science/energy-and-environment/agenda-2 l -part-iii... 2/23/2011 Agenda 21 Part III: Maryland County Abolishes Agenda 21 -now for the rest of the country ~ Energy and ... Page 5 of 5 Note: Part III was originally planned to discuss the de-population movement, but this breaking story took precedence. De- population will be covered at a later date. © 2007 - 2011 Right Side News :This text may be reported or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL. James Simpson is a freelance journalist, businessman and former White House budget analyst.. His writings have also been published on Big Government, Big Peace, Emerging Corruption, American Thinker, Washington Times, WorldNetDaily, FrontPage Magazine and Right Side News, Soldier of Fortune and others. His blog is Truth & Consequences. http://www.rightsidenews. com/2011022312907/life-and-science/energy-and-environment/agenda-2 l -part-iii... 2/23/2011 rF~~~ ~^/1Z'~ ~' rJ~." .,. 0. i ~~~ ~.r, ~~ ~ ~ ~- ~~ ,r ~''titi ' ~;,, ' r ~~, _~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 17.A. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Establishment of an Eastern Midlothian Turnpike Service District County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reques Hold public hearing, adopt ordinance establishing the Eastern Midlothian Turnpike Service District. Summary of Information: A service district is proposed to establish athree-cent supplemental real estate tax for property owners in the Eastern Midlothian Turnpike Corridor to finance median landscaping, a gateway sign, and quality maintenance for Midlothian Turnpike. The Chesterfield County Revitalization staff, the Gateway Association, and property owners have held numerous meetings and discussions and have produced a first phase improvement project for the Midlothian Turnpike from Chippenham Parkway to just west of Turner Road. Two meetings have been held to which all area property owners have been invited by mail. On October 5, 2010, all property owners within the proposed district were mailed a notice of the proposed three-cent supplemental tax and invited to a meeting to discuss the proposed improvements and tax increase. wide property owner support was voiced at that meeting. Preparers Thomas E. Jacobson Title: Director of Revitalization Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ~?f3~2~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA This service district will not negatively impact the financing of the Cloverleaf Mall redevelopment project. Crosland supports the establishment of this service district to finance median streetscape improvements and quality maintenance. Median landscaping, a gateway sign, and quality maintenance is proposed for a seven-tenths of a mile section of Midlothian Turnpike between the Chippenham Parkway interchange and just west of the Turner Road intersection. This project is estimated to cost $246,000 for landscape and other improvements, $41,000 for production of construction plans and construction management, and $28,000 - $35,000 annually for quality maintenance. The project is to be financed through a three-cent supplemental real estate tax on benefiting properties in the area. A service district is proposed to establish this source of funding. See attached ordinance and map for the proposed boundaries. It is proposed that Chesterfield County finance the landscaping installation and be reimbursed by the proposed service district over five to seven years depending on the future assessed value of the property. Project drawings are available at www.chesterfieldrevitalization.com/emplans A public hearing must be held before a service district can be established. Virginia law provides no minimum requirements for property owner support for the proposed service district. An effective date of January 1, 2012 is proposed. This district is proposed to cease in ten years. 0~02~?1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS A ENDA Budget and Management Comments: The proposed landscape improvements (including construction management) along eastern Midlothian Turnpike are estimated to cost $287,000. In addition, the project includes an estimated $28,000 in annual maintenance costs (for an initial outlay of $315,000). A special tax district is proposed to finance the improvements. Under such a scenario, the county would front the full cost of the project and be reimbursed over a period of time from a supplemental three-cent increment on the real estate tax for those privately-owned parcels in the special district. Based on the projected value of the properties in the special tax district as of January 1, 2011, the supplemental tax would generate approximately $65,600 annually, which would be used to repay the county. Accordingly, staff estimates that the county's investment (inclusive of the annual $28,000 outlay for maintenance costs) would be repaid within seven years (see table below). That said the repayment window is likely to decrease if the construction and/or maintenance costs come in under their projected totals. In addition, the scenario embedded in the table below includes very conservative revaluation assumptions that are in line with staff's long-run forecast. However, the scenario does not include any additional revenue from new construction in the area, which, most notably, excludes the expected improvements to the Cloverleaf Mall site. Any such improvements would also reduce the projected repayment window. Supplemental Tax Outstanding Year Revenue County Outlay* Page 3 of 3 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 $65, 600 $65,600 $65,600 $65,600 $65, 600 $65, 600 $65,600 $28,000 each year for $315, 000 $249,400 $211,100 $171,800 $131,500 $89,800 $46,700 $2,200 maintenance *adds an additional The county would use economic development reserves to provide the initial project funding. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management a~?€a~~~ E. Midlothian S ecial District '' * ' ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ / Epl aD ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ i ~ • ~M ~ ~~ ; r ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ + • ~, ! ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ! ; r ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ • ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ^ ~ ' 1~ t ocN ~ ~ ~ ~ / 1 ~ ~ / ~ I' ~ 1 !~~ 1 ~ ~ •~a ~ r '~ ~ ~ • w~ ~ ~ ~. ~j ' ~ , ~~~1 ~' ~~ QO~~\ ~ ~~ Q `~ ~\~~ Poi ~ ~ 1 f r . ~~ . ~ '~o r~ •' 0 ,. .. ~. ,~ ~ • ~.~ ~ ti ~~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ f tY~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~~ ,~~~ ~~ ~ • ~i 'ire ~ ~•, ~ ,M10LOM1PN TPKE t/ 1WPNt~E ~ ~ • • MtD~o , ~ ~ ~ ,' . ~. • ~ f '' ~ ~ ~ ~ • PROVINCETOWN DR ~ , ® .. ~- ~. ~ :; , ERTREE CT ~ ~ ~ q ~ 1] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ , ~ my q • ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 2IX17Aerial Photography Disclaimer: All date is provided "AS IS."The Cannronweaflh of Yuginia, the Yrginia Cheste~eld County assumes no legal responsibility for the Infomtation Geographic Wormation Network and then rmpective officers, agrnts and employem joinily and severally disclaim Copyright ©2009 Chesterfield County, Virginia contained on this map. This map is not be used for land conveyance. any end all reprmeraations orwartantim, express or implied, wrinen or oral, in face a wising by operafion of law, 2002 Aerial Photography - Public Domain Horizontal data is based on the VA State Plane Coordinates stem, NAD83. including any warrantim of merdrerdability, fitness for a particular purpae, eauracy, currency, cornmeroial value, Printed by ESRITM ArcGISrM Y a freedan of data from infringement of arty third party irddlectual property rights. Topographic information is based on 1989 oto mmetry, NAV29, rtl ~~ ~~~ ~ ,~ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED BY ENACTING SECTIONS 9-265, 9-266, 9-267, 9-268, 9-269, 9-270 AND 9-271 CREATING THE EASTERN MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE CORRIDOR SERVICE DISTRICT WHICH PROVIDES FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING AND DECORATIVE BANNERS ON MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE AND WHICH IMPOSES A TAX ON REAL ESTATE LOCATED WITHIN THE DISTRICT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That an Ordinance enacting Sections 9-265, 9-266, 9-267, 9-268, 9-269, 9-270 and 9-271 creating the Eastern Midlothian Corridor Service District which provides for the installation and maintenance of landscaping and decorative banners on Eastern Midlothian Turnpike and which imposes a tax on property located within the District is enacted as follows: Section 9-2b5. Definitions. The following words shall have the following meaning within this ordinance: Director of Revitalization: The Director of Revitalization of Chesterfield County or esignee. District: The Eastern Midlothian Turnpike Corridor Service District Map of the District: The Map entitled "E Midlothian Special District" prepared by the Chesterfield County Economic Development Department and that is on file with the Director of Revitalization. That map also shows the boundaries of the District, and all parcels located in the District. Plan of the District: The plan entitled "Eastern Midlothian Turnpike, Chesterfield County Proposed Streetscape Improvements -Phase I" dated October 5, 2010, and as may be subsequently amended. That plan is on file with the Director of Revitalization, and shows the landscaping to be installed within the District. Project: The installation and maintenance of landscaping as described in Section 9-268. Section 9-266. Establishment of the Eastern Midlothian Turnpike Corridor Service District. Pursuant to Code of Virginia, Section 15.2-2400 et. seq., and to Sections 2.1 and 2.4 of the Charter of the County of Chesterfield, there is hereby created in the county the Eastern Midlothian Turnpike Corridor Service District. Oi3i1~~~} 0505:85246.1 Section 9-267. Boundaries of the District. The boundaries of the District shall be defined as shown on the Map of the District. Section 9- 268. The Purpose of the District and the Facilities and Services Proposed Within the District. The purpose of the district is to provide high quality landscaping, streetscape improvements, and landscaping maintenance on the Midlothian Turnpike median within the District as shown on the Plan of the District. The current condition of landscaping and maintenance of the median degrades the appearance and image of the District in a way that, over time, can lead to lower business customer satisfaction, reduced property values, lessening of business activity, and blight. The landscaping and streetscape materials to be installed are illustrated on the Plan of the District. The final installation design shall meet the requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation and shall be approved by the Director of Revitalization. The entire median of Midlothian Turnpike through the District shall be periodically mowed, pruned and planted with seasonal annual flowers. Debris shall be removed and other maintenance shall also be performed as necessary to maintain a high quality landscaping appearance. Section 9- 269. Plan for Financing the Facilities and Services Within the District. The installation of landscaping, streetscape materials, and maintenance of the Midlothian Turnpike median within the District shall be financed by a $0.03 per $100 of assessed value, supplemental real estate tax placed on all real estate located within the District. This tax is in addition to the real estate tax imposed on real estate in the county pursuant to the county's annual tax levy. The supplemental tax shall fund construction and maintenance costs of the Project for a period of ten (10) years. The supplemental real estate tax of $0.03 per $100 of assessed value shall expire on December 31, 2021. Section 9-270. Benefits That Can Be Expected From The Project. This image, attractiveness, and quality of this service area will improve. This area is a gateway to Chesterfield County. This project will provide benefit to properties throughout the District. Customers, employees, residents, and visitors to the businesses in the District form impressions of the businesses and properties within the District based on the appearance and condition of Midlothian Turnpike. A quality landscaping installation, streetscape improvements, and a high quality of maintenance on the Midlothian Turnpike median will provide a positive image and appearance for the property and businesses within the District. This project will assist in sustaining this important business area and preventing blight and deterioration. Q~~?~5 0505:85246.1 2 Section 9-271. Recordation. An abstract of this ordinance shall be recorded among the land records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County so as to place subsequent purchasers of any property located in the District on notice of the supplemental real estate tax imposed pursuant hereto. (2) This ordinance shall take effect on January 1, 2012. 0505:85246.1 3 ~~ ~~ _~ s~ ~~ tc -..sue ~~~ ~~ ~, ~~ ~~ ,~ ww~ i _. _._ M _ F~ - ~_~ ~~ _. ~: -- r ._~ ~.- ~. i~' ~__: ~ • A 1 t 1 a l r ; j f' '£ ~ ~Ha' ~ a~ ; i'=~i1ill~tilf`t tillii;~il'iai~j ~~. t•~niiiiii~ :~ ~~ ,L' ~+ O W -1 ~ ~ .~~`~ ~~ ~ ~ _ - ,~ ~ ~ ~ a~ •~ +~ ,~ ~ ~ ~, ~~ r~ 4p~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ti-' .r ~~ 1 ~ ~ s ~~~~, ~ ~. ~` ~ `~~, 4 ~.ar~ 'tip F~'~ti ti ~. 1 r, w ~~ ~e ~ e ~ r~ _ _ _~ _ ~ t .€ ~ _, r r </~ Your Community Newspaper Since 1995 P.O. Box 1616, Midlothian, yir~inia 231.13 • Phone: (RO4) j45-'7i(H) • Fax: (AO4) 7.34-3269 • Email: news@chesterfieldobserveccom • Internet: www.chesterfieldobserver.com ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Chesterfield County LN: Service District 2-2, 9, 16 1/2P Board of Supervisors $775.00 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER ATTACH AD HERE This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 2/2/2011, 2/9/2011 & 2/16/2011 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~tl~~ day of ~~~Ar' , 2010. C Legal Affiant J T, Grooms Jr., Notary Public My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission I.D. 7182093 (SEAL) mj.; ~WEA~ j. - ~ "s g ; ~ EXPIE~ES ~~ : ~ ~~ ' . tI1 K2C9' • ~t•: ~ ~i ~Q ''•...•• ' ®~ is .~ iy ~ ,\~ v. ~•~ ~ R Y , ~h~t+t,.., •,,,,,~~ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. ~ ;~~~ -~ .° ie __ He take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Chester at an adjourned ~- VW~~ 23, 1 at ~ ianptuhbe~t Public 1tooIIi ate on ~t1:. 1 aud3.ori._ dd,. and. C ~~~~e i5:2-2400; et: ~o# Vuyd~, i!5!0. as amendEd, and' ruaIIt to ~yt.l 2.4 of the a~f Chaber6ddGu~ ~ man air+_ _ c~ estsbhah tLe Easteen l~o~n ei0siloe Corrado: Serve D~tri~ct. to 5nance median L~ Arc -banners, and a~u~ce, a~rdaP ire awn the east< ~e'itoYthera~banix>a~' of Boulders 1~ froritiIIg'Ibme;l~c~d between than Tlungilae C1o~erieafMall Drive oII-the west; and Cloverleaf lam. ~ prepaed ordinancep~o~ides -f01° the aeatrOII of tht-ian Ttrrapiice Corridnr Serl4ce;Diunct, which COfitatllE 13B. ;. of the ~th de i t d d 8 kt b~ es T a ~Di f h dl h 4a d Tl i M r o e Ivl4 ot 4sn i< gisfesnt tr kanctisr't Distr ct e p c e a ~e parc s oc ks r~ 1 ~ • > b belovz 'Ihe adtnence further pmvries for teal estate taa ~"the auoioimt of S0.@3,:p6r 11TCt-: of esaesse$ _: oII the paicela located iu the District 'the suppled. `for a period of ten years to begin on Jaduary 1.2012 and . ._ on December 31, 202E _ . A 14st of the owners of property located in the District. aod~tbdlu:~ ps~rd number of the parcels which they own, ;$ set forth ~Sda~waers appear at the public and, if they rwsh. against the su enter! tmt. or aga~iet dse ad of a~naIIOe. 1 of the otdinance>.1Vlape'District>, ~~~~•'t?lstrid are aYBiI~fOI public viewitrg`between e• a,tn; 5'~O pm; Y through Friday, iII the fbesterfield s OBce. ~er the public hearing, appmprLte b'es'et tortes gybe made to the ordinance. The hearing is herd at a p®blie fa~Y desigc~d ~ be acca~le to Peasq~ssr~+ disabilities. AnY Pers~s with q~tidsss ~ the ~cces% of t~e,fadBty or need for rasoriabk acaatronnodations ahoultl cv Clerk to the Board, at 748-13118. , Persona nceding ~B1 r services for4he,deaf moat notify the Clerk to the Board ~ ao:~gr than > February i8, 2011. - pROPFRT'YOLVNER GPH+I NTO Bdid-l3d.JahnAOO;'ltmtee _ 7~0 Bdih bl. Jo~eon,ltmtee 76373i6~ 000880 - LindsLewis ~ 7b8707#6~2000A0 S1t~ran W. Stone, 7 7637$721930000@ _ F.dilhlN: JalnRUa &ltoberkL Jobnron 763`07443800000 itosab-1rLrtiuezBtAasac»lrc. 7637~b9'S780000D0 - _ HLZCloteld~LLC 76371M111J300000 INutioezBrAasotistea,lsc. 76307834100000 Roesler-Mardoes & Assoq loc. 763708271800000 - Roples-l~4sriiuriBcAasoc,Tnc. 763708296800000 l)nioIIBoulde~sLandLLC _ jsmesB:I•~nie 7637118350!00000 '&actlVg9LLC 13 (der 8c Trady F. Chaod{er _ 763708363500000 ~ Boulders Owners Affioc, lnc. - !inane B~hiwodatBouldeisLLC i '.~~~ 76371 0Za0l00000 ~'+y Dori Modmrade Cusce LP. 763710284700000 - Kenneth l: Jones 8c06dis J.lo~• ~ ?63711642500000 union . Lsnd, LLC C~pny LLC 763711908500000 llonldeaCommons, LLC I~ 114 - ~ ` . - _76371230570(3000 tJoiat Bealdaa l,~d, LLG _ 762706185!00000 Bdward D: Alien; ~ _ 763712501500000 Libertyl'topetty ` 761706054000000 Edward D, Allen . 763712876100000 Orr 3t MOBS LLC - 7627116090700000 'fhomssMBohwnm-' - 76~1018184000D0 CaeNeB l3miDed)?~rtliaaihip, 762706146100000- , CD Rea~uan<s, inc 7647!05009500000 5 "'~`B~r L15' • ,.. CD Resmmams, lnc. 762706194980000 764705058200090 5 "~"' $adh!~ampeny LP , 762706203200000 lN~hadVanIQgaymB<1~oemsiLlVguyen 76171K386400000 Ecaoo~tDado~AudtafthcCobntyaf(~ea6d 762?0622Zsi000pt- WduF.rrierprisea,lnc. ` 715470566G800Q00 Eceow~d3erdop~Audtd~ieGoH4lydf]~WeS-fid 7617061513001100- 'momssM.Boh~nm 764'105832700000. ~lcaeorwicptrelpQewtl~td~eCauntyoftdd 763706280~1000D. ThomssM:Bohsomn - I6470b30T100000 Ecodami~DevdapmentAutha>~eCiruntgofCheaberfidd ~ ~ ~ Aod-oftheCoimtyafChshrfield ` 7Pleren ~b4'JOT 36Yi'AA554iE080b--~-l~iY1t06~aond:V~,I.LC 7647117601400000 BconomicDtvefnpmmEAutltoflheGtinglyaf(beskr5eid 7fi1T06660800000 ; 1VoodYropertieaLP,LLP - 7617031200000' _. ,: 761'106736800000' :LlRemoiader;IJ.C 764708744100000 762706770800000 lliKttaePalt .?647!09377400000 762706785500000 Pbumg'l6ixYmBrHmgQ'han , 764709490700000 762706816900000 ,MaA~oetaB;BtmaAtgyem 7&F?0957~OA000 Joseph .1W1a0d,LLC~ 762706947200000' , 764909808300000 , 761708986000000- A~onLlieadersonBrVagieIieaderaon 76!709882300000 - ` 762707410300000 - PrimePrspaties,LLC 7647101398000013 762707478800900 YACLio~edPartnaship 764710192100000 - 762707510700000' Pr~el!ropatia,LLC 764710614700000 7112707613100000 :WPB13r LLC~ 764711428800000 76i2708f8530011011 .LGAAeoomtrslld,PaRnaahip 76!711601000000 ~ - ~ 762709368000000 VAC Lim#ted Parmets)dp 761712174200000 - orh'$mnM O 762709511900000 VACLiositedTattnetahq 765704269300000 LeoooeaicDeodAuthaftkCamtyof(~a~fidd 7627099402000110 LO11AtaxLlxsltd.Psttoaahip 765704658900000 Dahoad;LLC Devlmatora,lLC . ~: Bould~a, ~ PugioiaCrediftJnioo,igc." ServEsrtl 7b371141, iav > _ ~~ 7 ~ , 1 I,~,lp Kw ,. .. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~;,~;,,,, . AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 17.B. Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domain for the Acquisition of Permanent Water and Temporary Construction Easements for the Hopkins Road Water Line Rehabilitation Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Reques Authorize the County Attorney to proceed with eminent domain for the acquisition of permanent water and temporary construction easements for the Hopkins Road Water Line Rehabilitation Project and authorization to enter and take such easements prior to eminent domain proceedings. Summary of Information: Staff has been negotiating for acquisition of variable width permanent and temporary construction easements for the Hopkins Road Water Line Rehabilitation Project. The following offers have been made for the easements needed: 7800 Hopkins Road, Lewis E. Kemmerer, $6,350.00; 7224 Hopkins Road, Russell B. and Carolyn C. Daugherty, $1,590.00; 7500 Hopkins Road, Kay H. Harrison, $200.00; and 7632 Hopkins Road, Won Ho Shin, $150.00. These offers have not been accepted. Out of a total of 22 easements required for this project, these four are the only ones that remain to be acquired. The contract for construction of the project is scheduled to be awarded at this meeting. It is necessary to proceed with condemnation for the health and safety of the public . Approval is recommended. DIStPICt: Dale Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # VICINITY SKETCH PUBLIC HEARING: Request to Exercise Eminent Domain for the installation of the Hopkins Road Water Line Rehab Project Shin, ~'on Ho 1fi32 H~p~ins R~' ~' f PIN : t ~~~770446 f~: ~~ ,f r~r r ~,r r 1 f f ~ r1f~ tfl~ l~~r !' j ~~r ~f ~ 1 -~' '~ Kemmerer, Lewis E Kemmerer, Lewis E 7800 Hopkins Rtl 7800 Hopkins Rtl ~ PIN: 782675~325700~00~0 PIN: 782675325700400 ~ i ~ Chesterf'~eld bounty Department of Utilities . w ~ t ~ - ~5o zeee~ ~~~~~ VICINITY SKETCH PUBLIC HEARING: Request to Exercise Eminent Domain for the Installation he s Road Water Line Rehab Pro'ect Da~herty, Russell 8.8~ Carolyn C. 7224 Napkins Road PIN: 781678756300000 ~1 ~ti 1'w] ~l ~o ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~` B ~ B `~ .~ Kay Harrison 7500 Hopkins Road PIN: 782677044600000 ~L D N ~h~sterfi~ld ~t~unty Diep$~tment oaf Utilities W ~ 4 ~ 1 - a33.3s'~e~ a~3i~~~J9 ~~~ ~ W~~ Qq~ W~ a. ~Q~~ ~ ~ ~' Y Q~ywW •t ~ 4Q~ ~N ~~~~ 3 ~ ~' U a W ~g~~ ~, ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ w ~~ ~ _`~, ,~,~ \ ''~ • "q,~ t~ g 1st ~~ ~` ~ ~~ / ry J F ~ „ Q ~` ~. w • ~ ~ ~~ , ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ a ~ ~~ ~ o ~ ~ W ,, W ~ '. w , ~ ti,o ~ w ~ w ~~ ~ h .. r ~r~r~rtd~F ~N N ~~-N~ w WW~WWW~3W ~~ xzx:H~H:a ~~~~~~~~ ~~ y ~ ~, ~' , r~ e~ ~~~~ b ~~~~ ,~ ~SIiIA q o Q ~ r. s ~~ ~ @" w ~ ~~ ~ ,; ~- ~~! ^ ~ ~ PEAT PREPARED 8Y; PRECISION MEASUREMENTS, INC. 211 f~ DABNEY ROAD SUITE B5 RICHMOND, VA 23230 00 w OF PLAT OF A VAR. WIDTH WATERLINE EA SEMEN T ~ A 10' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY RUSSEL B AND CAROLYN DAUGHERTY DALE DISTRICT N CHESTERFIELD CO. VIRGINIA N 11' 18' W 763' TO BEULAH RD. DUP/NS, CEDRlC OB 8060, PG 495 GPlN~ 781678718000000 7218 HOPKlNS RDAD N;3678738.44 E;~'f'I$~~ 1 10.01' j X5,04 r p'~'~~~H of ~~ RLA M. LONG ~ o. ~ p oo2s~z t 7-~~1 D8~ ~N~ SUR`1Ey0 g•47'43„ i ~ ~ ~ ~ S7 ~ i~SMENT ~- ~ ~ E ~ ~ .. N~-0 0 16~ 0~ p0 24 ~ 1 ~ B 4785 PG i '~ 1 ~ . S 0 0-.,~ P8 ! 0 ~ ` 1 ~ l ~ 10' conlsr, ESM'r~` 2 i, 783,2 SQ. FT. 1 ~ < N I ~ C 0.040 ACRES ~ ~ ., ~ ,~ z ` ~. ~ ~ ~ N ~o ~ ~ ~ ~. ~-~ off' Z ~ ~ 1; ~ =o o ,` b~ Ob ~~ • N ~ ~1 ~~ ~c ~ ~ V. ~ ~ ~ 1 J j ,' J 1.~ v . ~ __~~1VV111~ ~ ~ ~+111 `~~ 1 ~~ v I ~ ` 1 ARIA9LE WIDTH WATERLINE ESM'r 5,382.6 SQ. FT, I 0.124 ACRES 1 ' 1 34'60 " N 79'29 57 9.99' R~ N; r. CULt/NS, MICHAEL W & MEArMER N DB 7876, PG 220 GPIN~ 781678614600000 7232 MOPKlNS RDAD . 0' 30' 60' 90' SCALE; ~ "=30' LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 14'22'13" E 6.74' L2 S 14'22' 14" E 7.00' DATE; JULY ~ 4, 2008 COUNTY PROJECr~ 05-01428 ooo?~~ PLOT , PREPARED BY: PRECISION MEASUREMENTS, INC. 2116 DABNEY ROAD SUITE B5 RICHMOND, VA 23230 D v w N 14'10' W 410' TO OKEHAMPTON DRIVE N:3677527.31 MCBR/DE, JAMES V TRUSTEE E:11782113.9 DB 5738, PG 55 GPlN~' 782877055600000 7424 HOPK/NS ROAD DALE DISTRICT N CHESTERFIELD CO. VIRGINIA / ~'~~H of Gj~~ p RIAN M. ONG ,.,, o. a 002372 ~~ Z~~~ ~N~ SUR~EyO 79'06~27~~ E N 10'01 44 L1 .-~R Pe ~ 9, PGA , - ~NT ` 1 -~C' 1 ~SEM ~ ~ 8 - ~ 1 ~ o ~ 1 '~ 10' TEMP. ~ Z CONST. ESM'T ~ z ~ N 998, 9' SQ. FT. ? 1 ~ ~ O 0, 023 ACRES ~, ~ o °- ~ ~` o _ o °1 s ~ ~1 ~ ~ N ~1 ~ hG4Rl?~~ON, KAY H D~ 4472, P-G 454 ~ 1 c° 1 ~ 1 ~ W GP/N T526771?446a00-00 ~ J 1 1 .'~ 75010 N-OPKINS RrAgO 1 KIM8E1?LY ACRES 1 LOT 14, ~f.K ~, SEC 2 1 PJ9 19, PrG 44 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ 10,02 79.041 g" E N N' 74 .4 E:11782138.30 WR/GHT, MARIAN H TRUSTEES DB 4184, PG 484 GPIN~ 782877073500000 7506 HOPK/NS ROAD K/MBERL Y ACRES LOT 9, BLK A, SEC 2 PB 19, PG 44 0' 20' 40' 60' SCALE: 1 a=20' LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 13'49'02" E 4,42' DATE: AUGUST 2, 2007 COUNTY PROJECr# 05-0142R PLAT OF A VARIABLE WIDTH TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF KA Y H HARRISON PLAT PREPARED BY: PRECISION MEASUREMENTS, INC. PLAT OF A VARIABLE WIDTH 2116 DABNEY ROAD sUIrE B5 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION RICHMOND, VA 23230 EASEMEN ~ ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF WON HO SHIN DALE DISTRICT N CHESTERFIELD CO. VIRGINIA ~ ~ p~' ~ A ~ ~~ ° ~ .LONG ~' ~ U ~' 2372 ~,~ ~'Z~ ~ oe- N~ SuR~~~ PHILLIPS, CHARLES D C 1 D8 7557, PG 18 L=187.40' GP/N~ 782676204600000 R=1322.58' 7624 HOPK/NS ROAD p=08'07'06" C LEN=18 7.24' BRG=S 21'57'43" E 10.03' N:3676480.16 C2 L=65 91' E:11782386.94 . R=1308.88 ~ p=02'53'06" ' ~~ 4'26 ~ C4 1 CLEN=65.90 ' ' " 1 ~~ . 5 ~6 ~ ~ BRG=N 24 30 32 W 1 s VARIABLE WIDTH D C3 L=121 07 CONST. ESM'T ~ w1 ~ . R=1623.43 1,854.1 SQ. F?. ~ 1i p =04' 16'22" 0.043 ACRES \ c q ~ ° CLEN=121.04 ' " ~ ~ ~ BRG=S 20'3) 04 E 1 ~ ~D 1 ~ ~4 y ~ C4 L=o.77' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R=1331,88' ' ' " SJ~I/N, WnN MO ~ p=00 01 59 C LEN=0.77' ~ 6531, ~ '~3 ~ ~ BRG=S 17'53' 10" E GPIJV~ 7826762 ~ 7632 l~'OPKlNS JP~1D ~1 N~ ~ ~~ E ~4'06~26 N 10.16' S 28 59 E ~ N:3676306.10 145 TO OLD E:11782456.93 ROAD ANDERSON, WILLIAM C & SUSAN E 08 3747, PG 426 GP/N~ 782676311800000 7636 NOPKINS ROAD 0' 40' 80' 120' SCALE: 1 ~=40' DATE: AUGUST 2, 2007 COUNTY PROJECT# 05-0142R ~ ~ ~ ~~ February 23, 2011 Speaker's List Evening Session #1 (Following Presentation of Resolutions) 1. Mr. Daren Gardner 2. Ms. Sharon Murphy 3. 4. 5. Evening Session #2 (End of the Evening Agenda) 1. Mr. George Emerson 2. 3. 4. 5. ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Chesterfield County Right of Way LN:Hopkins Rd Rehab 2-16 1/20P+.64 in. $191.21 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER That on February 23, 20l 1, at 6:30 p. m. or s soon thereafter as maybe heard, the Board f Supervisors of Chesterfield County at its :gular meeting place in the Public tiieeting oom of Chesterfield County, Virginia, ill consider the exercise of eminent omain for the acquisition of easements :rocs the following properties; P-N: 8267532;7000(10, 78W Hopkins Road; IN: 78167875631>D000, 7224 Hopkins uad; PIN: 782677044600000, 7500 lopkins Road: PIN: 78267626350(1000, 532 Eiopkins Road for the Hopkins Road Dater Line Rehabilitation Project. Information regarding the easement qquisition is on file in the Right of Way office in Chesterfield County, Virginia, td may be examined b)' alb interested artier between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 00 p.m., Monday through Friday. 'fhe hearutg is held at a public facility siggned to be accessible to persons with isabilities. Any persons with questions n the azcessibi{ity of the facility or need ~r reasonable accommodations should >ntact Janice B. Alakley, Clerk to the nand, at 748-1200. Persons needing derpreter services for the deaf must ~tify the Clerk to the Boazd no later than ^bruary 18, 2011. This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the follo~~ing date(s): 2/16/2011 S~~~orn to and subscribed before me this ~~ day of r~CQ/y , X010. C Legal Affiant es "I', Grooms .Ir., ry Public My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission LD. 7182093 (SEAL) `x•,,,,,,, r,r rr,~t, ~ x ,...., a,A _ iii z ExP:~ES ©~, ~ _ „• Q • v Q2-29-.2 _ ~ t118209' .. ~~.•' ~,~R61h~P•~ I'Illti Iti \O'1' :~ Rll.l.. I'LH::~~N: 1':~l FltO~1 I\~'OIC'I~:. 1'11.\{h l Ol . P.O. &rx 1616. Midlothian, Virginia ?? I I? • Phony: tht111 i.3i-7>INl • Fax: t~11J17-W-3?69 • Email: nru s(a chestrrtielduh>~rvrr.com •Internet. uww.chcacrtirlclubsrncecum CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 r AGENDA Meeting Date: February 23, 2011 Item Number: 20. Sub'ect: Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting Supervisors County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: r ~~~ Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: of the Board of Motion of adjournment and notice of the Board of Supervisors meeting to be held on March 7, 2011 with dinner at 5:00 p.m. in Room 303 and budget presentations to follow at 6:00 p.m. in the Public Meeting Room. Preparers Janice Blakley Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Clerk to the Board