Agenda, Packets, Minutes
12/29/2003 1:34:36 PM
11/20/2003 6:47:01 PM
Board of Supervisors
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
All rights reserved.
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View plain text
The proposed, zoning and land use does not comply with the Route 360 Corridor <br />Plan. Although the Plar~..suggests the property is. apprOPriate ?or a mix of uses to <br />include office, church and pUblic facility uses and residential developments up to six <br />(6) Units per acre, the proposed zoning and land use failsto incorporate high quality <br />site amenities and cluster design to maintain open space as recommended by the Plan <br />to provide appropriate transition between the office :development south of the request <br />property, as well as the single family residential use to the north. ' <br /> <br />The application fails to provide for the typical development standards necessary to <br />insure a quality higher density development with amenities. <br /> <br />Some of the requested exceptions to multifamily development standards would allow <br />greater development flexibility. In particular, the requested exceptions to internal <br />development requirements, together with 'the proffered conditions, would allow <br />multifamily development that possesses a character more in keeping with area single <br />family residential neighborhoods than would be' allowed with typical Multifamily <br />Residential (R-MF) zoning. HoWever, some of the requested exceptions, such as <br />those related to prOvisions for sidewalks and buffer and building setback reductions <br />fi:om property lines, are inappropriate given the :higher density of development and <br />the need to offset the impact on adjacent single family residential development, as <br />well as future residents Within this development. <br /> <br />(NOTE: CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED OR THE PROPERTY OWNER MAY PROFFER <br />CONDITIONS. THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPoN BY <br />BOTH STAFF AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE <br />RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE <br />ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION,) <br /> <br />CONDITION <br /> <br />(CPC) <br /> <br />With the approval of this request, the Textual Statement revised September 18, 2003, <br />is approved. (P) <br /> <br />PROFFERED CONDITIONS <br /> <br />(CPC) <br /> <br />t. Public water and wastewater shall be used. (Id) <br /> <br />(CPC) 2. <br /> <br />The applicant, subdivider, or assignee(s) shall pay the following, for <br />infrastructure improvements'within the service district for the property, to the <br />county of Chesterfield prior to the issuance of building permit for <br />infrastructure improvements within the service.district for the property: <br /> <br />$4,815.00 per dwelling unit, ifpald prior to July 1, 2003. At the time <br />of payment, the $4,815.00 will be allocated pro-rata among the <br />facility costs as follows: $598.00 for parks and recreation, $324.00 <br /> <br />2 03 SN0162-NOV25-BOS <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.