|
~IRG~: At an adjourned meetin~ of ~he
<br /> Board of Supervisors o£
<br /> Chesterfield County, hel~ at
<br /> the Courthouse on Aprii
<br /> 1955, at 7:30 p.m.
<br />
<br />Present:
<br />
<br />Mr. irvin G. Homer, Chairman
<br />Mr. 11. T. Goyne
<br />Mr. Stanley R. Hague, Jr.
<br />])r. Robt. O. ~ill
<br />Mr. R. J. I{ritton
<br />51r. J. P. Crunter
<br />
<br />This day Nit. D. W. ~lurphey, representing ~'Irs. Cecil T. Chappelle, came before
<br />the l{oard again requesting a buildinC permit on a 12.5-foot lot .on }~utte Road,
<br />and
<br />Whereas, the building; would be faced on a private drive, and said buildin~
<br />constructed on the rear of said lot, and
<br />Whereas, numerous complainte have been received from ~he citizens in the
<br />general nei~huorhood concerning the proposed construction of said building, and
<br />~hereas, it was stated that another buildin~ was planned to be erected on the
<br />f~-ont part of ~he same lot, in which case the bui].di~]g on the rear of' said lot
<br />would be on a private road.
<br />Upon consideration whereof, ~r. Gunter offered the following motion:
<br />That this I{oard, acting as a t~uilding Committee, deny the request of Mrs.
<br />Cecil 'F. Ghappelle for a building permit, which motion died for the wa~lt of a
<br />second , ~
<br />The Commonwealth's Attorney advised the }~oard that there was no law by which
<br />this pea'mit could be denied. Whereupon, 5~r. Britton stated he would like very
<br />much to or)pose the issuance of a building permit in this ca~e, however, in
<br />view of the Commonwealth Attorney,s rulin~ he could not do so.
<br />
<br />Upon furgher consideration and on mot[on of Mr. Goyne, seconded by Hr. Hague,
<br />it is resolved that on advice of the I&oard's counsel, this }{oard acting as a
<br />}~u[ldin~. Committee doth hereby aulhorize the Buildin.g Inspector to issue the
<br />requested permit.
<br />
<br />it is here noted that ~Ir. ~;unter and ~Ir. Homer vote "No".
<br />
<br />'[his day ~lr. Ruehl, ~lr. Talcott and Mr. 5medbury, from the firm of R. Stuart
<br />Royer and ~kssociates, camebefo~-e the ~%oard to propose the improvement of the
<br />water system.
<br />
<br />~r. Ruehl stat;ed that his firm would complet(~ this work on a fee basis or cost
<br />pi. us basis.
<br />
<br />This day Mr. Louis l.ongest and ~Ir. W. C. Trueheart came before the l{oard
<br />requesting that the ]{card grant the Company of Trueheart, Bar,left, and Longest,
<br />permission to extend the se~,er lines in the Morrisdale area to serve ten (10)
<br />lots in the Forest Glenn Subdivision, which ten I~S will riot pass percolation
<br />tests.
<br />Mr. Longest guaranteed the maximum number of connections on the sewerage
<br />treatment plant would not be exceeded accordin/~ ~o the original specifications.
<br />{Iron consideration who. reef and on motion of Mr. Goyne, seconded by blt. Gunter,
<br />it is resolved that this |%card approve the request and enlarge tile existing
<br />contract to include ten lots in the ~'orest Glenn section.
<br />
<br />This day Mr. R. Kenneth Weeks, from the firm of Causey and Weeks, Norfold,
<br />Virginia, came before the ltoard to explain the procedure by which his Company
<br />would study the necessary improvment to the County water system. Mr. Weeks
<br />stated that his Company could start immediately, tha~they would set up an
<br />office in the area and would require approximately four months time to complete
<br />a preliminary report, said preliminary report to cost approximately $11,500.00.
<br />~Ir. Weeks stated that the overall cost of final plans would range between
<br /> ~ ~ ,!'
<br />~-~-,~ and 6,~ of the cost of the improvement.
<br />
<br />It is here noted that ~rlr. Shropshire, County Engineer, recommends the firm
<br />of Causey and Weeks.
<br />
<br />l~e l~oard agreed to delay consideration of this matter until a future meeting.
<br />
<br />'l'his day a list: of road additions approved by the Highway Department was read
<br />and filed with the ~{oard's paD,~rs.
<br />
<br />Additions
<br />
<br />Resolution
<br />
<br />Wray Street- I%eginning at the end of maintenance of Rt.
<br />1617, 0.20 Mi. E. of Rt. 1 and extending in an easterly
<br />direction 0.04 5]i. to dead end.
<br />Length 0.04 Mile
<br />
<br />3-8~55
<br />
<br />We~t Street.- 15eginning at int. Rt, 1626 and 1679 and
<br />ru~ning N. 0.06 Mi. to dead end.
<br />Length 0.06 Mile
<br />
<br />3-8-55
<br />
<br />
<br />
|