2023-01-25 Minutes
23-1
1/4/2023
DRAFT
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
JANUARY 25, 2023
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr. Kevin P. Carroll, Chair
Mr. James A. Ingle, Jr., Vice Chair
Mr. Christopher M. Winslow
Mr. James M. Holland
Dr. Mark S. Miller
Dr. Joseph P. Casey
County Administrator
Mr. Carroll called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved the minutes of November 16, 2022, December 9, 2022,
and December 14, 2022, as submitted.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
2. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE AGENDA ITEMS AND ADDITIONS,
DELETIONS OR CHANGES IN THE ORDER OF PRESENTATION
There were no requests to postpone agenda items and additions,
deletions or changes in the order of presentation.
3. WORK SESSIONS
3.A. EVERYDAY EXCELLENCE
Mr. George Hayes, Director of Utilities, recognized Mr. Dave
Sirois, Utilities Plant Manager, who recently came to the
rescue when a concerned Brandermill resident emailed the
department to let them know that his son’s favorite soccer
ball had accidentally blown into the Swift Creek Reservoir
while at Sunday Park. Mr. Sirois quickly sprang into action
and was able to retrieve the boy’s special soccer ball with a
pool skimmer near the Addison-Evans Water Treatment Facility.
Board members commended Mr. Sirois for his quick actions
related to the retrieval of the child’s soccer ball.
3.B. ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP UPDATE
Mr. Clay Bowles, Deputy County Administrator, joined by Mr.
Scott Smedley, Director of Environmental Engineering, Mr. Ted
Barclay, Special Projects Manager, Ms. Wendy Austin, Executive
Director at Friends of the Lower Appomattox River (FOLAR), and
Ms. Heather Barrar, Regional Trails Program Director at FOLAR,
provided the Board with an update on various environmental
stewardship topics which include an energy management update;
23-2
1/4/2023
information relative to fleet programs; recycling and
convenience center operations; upcoming events; Lego – facility
sustainability; information relative to the Environmental
Stewardship website; Environmental Engineering – Reservoir
update, RPA projects, tree canopy ordinance; Community
Enhancement – anti-litter/beautification efforts; and FOLAR –
trails update.
3.C. BUDGET UPDATE
Mr. Matt Harris, Deputy County Administrator, joined by Mr.
Gerard Durkin provided an update relative to budget related
topics including, a preview of the CIP and operating budget,
an update on real estate revaluation, school enrollment, and
an overview of the Superintendent's budget proposal. Mr. Durkin
stated the real estate market is facing headwinds, with
refinancing lower than 2019 levels. He further stated national
home prices growth is normalizing according to the National
Homme Price Index. He then reviewed the residential revaluation
percent relative to core CPI and population change. Regarding
car values, he stated price changes are softening from pandemic
highs. He then provided information relative to the personal
property billing process and stated car estimates in late
January-February are used for calculations for personal
property due in the same fiscal year. He noted inflation is
taking a hit on local consumer spending and the cost to
compensate employees is at its highest in over 20 years.
Regarding the FY2024 expenditure layout, he stated there is an
expectation of growth in revenues but taking cautious stance
with economic climate; and base FY2O24 budget has 1 cent cut
for real estate rate, factored in from $0.92 to $0.91. He
further stated facing expenditure pressures are tied to labor
market conditions, healthcare, debt service tied to
referendum, transfer to schools and tax relief for the elderly
and disabled. He noted additional funding requests are
currently being vetted with capacity tighter than prior years.
He then provided a StratIS/School capacity update. Regarding
Schools’ budget, he stated the Superintendent’s proposed
budget was presented yesterday with an initial layout searching
for an additional $16.8 million. He noted county staff believes
there are several pathways to balancing the Superintendent’s
proposal. In closing, Mr. Harris reviewed key upcoming budget
processes.
3.D. STATE LEGISLATIVE SESSION UPDATE
Ms. Natalie Spillman, Intergovernmental Relations
Administrator, provided the Board with a General Assembly
update. She stated the General Assembly 2023 session convened
on January 11th and noted over 2,100 bills have been introduced
through both the House and Senate. She then reviewed several
amendments as they pertain to the county.
3.E. CONSENT AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS
Mr. Jesse Smith, Deputy County Administrator, updated the board
on various consent agenda highlights being proposed this
evening which include authorizing the use of District
Enhancement Capital Improvement Funds (DECIF); items to set
public hearings for February 22, 2023, relative to Point of
23-3
1/4/2023
Rocks Code Amendment and Bellwood Estates Code Amendment; RAISE
Grant – Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability
and Equity; appropriate Chesterfield Transient Lodging Tax
overages to fund improvements at River City Sportsplex; item
to approve revisions to airport minimum standards; item to
approve revisions to the streetlight policy; and Indian Springs
Road Extension and Drainage Project contract.
4. REPORTS
4.A. DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS (DIF) MONTHLY REPORT
The Board approved the Monthly Report on District Improvement
Funds.
5. FIFTEEN-MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
Mr. Herbert Loveless addressed the Board relative to the recent
increase of electric bills.
6. RECESS FOR DINNER
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
recessed to dinner in Room 502.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
7. INVOCATION
The Honorable Jim Holland, Dale District Supervisors, gave the
invocation.
8. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mr. Matt Harris, Deputy County Administrator, led the Pledge
of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America.
9. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR UPDATE
9.A. VALOR AWARD RECIPIENTS
Dr. Casey announced that for 32 consecutive years, The 100
Club has made it part of its mission to recognize outstanding
service among public safety professionals throughout the
region. He stated though Board members attended the Valor
Awards ceremony last month, it was fitting to provide further
recognition this evening of the three individuals among the
public safety family who were honored with Valor Awards.
Ms. Jenna Mosman, executive director for The 100 Club RVA,
recognized Officer First Class Michael Dean, Police
Department; Deputy Teone Wilson, Sheriff’s Department; and
Deputy Donte Govine, Sheriff’s Department, for their
extraordinary acts of service.
23-4
1/4/2023
9.B. CHRISTMAS MOTHER UPDATE
Ms. Phyllis Poats, Christmas Mother Chairperson, provided an
updated to the Board regarding the outstanding success of the
2022 Christmas Mother Program.
9.C. RECOGNITION OF RECENT AWARDS AND EMPLOYEE ACHIEVEMENTS
There were no recognition of recent awards and employee
achievements at this time.
9.D. OTHER COUNTY ADMINISTRATION UPDATES
• Ms. Dalila Medrano, Multicultural Engagement Coordinator
of Citizen Information and Resources, provided details of
My Chesterfield Academy. She stated Chesterfield County,
in partnership with the Asian and Latino Solidarity
Alliance of Central Virginia hosts My Chesterfield Academy,
a great 7-month program that empowers residents,
particularly those from multicultural communities, to
understand and navigate the county and other community
resources. Today, 18 graduates from 14 different countries
were recognized and congratulated. She then introduced Mr.
Daniel Alvarado to talk about his experience in the
academy.
• Dr. Casey announced the Chesterfield Economic Development
Authority has formally begun the process of seeking
qualified master developers and/or development partners
for the Southside Speedway property. He stated the goal of
this Request for Qualifications or RFQ is to identify
experienced and capable partners who can master plan,
propose appropriate phasing, arrange financing, construct,
and successfully operate this important redevelopment
project. He noted the RFQ process does not rule out a
return to racing at Southside Speedway, which was closed
by its former owners in 2020 and acquired by the EDA the
following year.
• Dr. Casey announced Chesterfield has been selected to
receive a $25 million grant through the Virginia Business
Ready Sites Program and administered by the Virginia
Economic Development Partnership. He stated this money will
be focused on bringing the Upper Magnolia site in western
Chesterfield to a point of infrastructure development that
fits within the demands and tight timetables advanced
manufactures require today. He further stated the grant
being received is among some $90 million in grants awarded
to 21 sites stateside.
• Dr. Casey provided details relative to the upcoming Special
Election for the 4th U.S. Congressional District seat left
vacated by the passing of the late U.S. Rep. Donald
McEachin and the recent announcement by the Chesterfield
Observer, a devoted county-wide publication, plans to close
after 27 years.
23-5
1/4/2023
10. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
Mr. Winslow announced the first of two public meetings on the
Woolridge Road Widening project was held Monday. He stated the
next meeting will be January 31 at Woolridge Elementary. He
noted the intent is to provide multiple opportunities for
citizens to learn about the project and provide feedback on
the proposed improvements.
Mr. Holland announced he spoke with some of the county’s
brightest students during the Youth Citizen Board’s meeting
and also attended the Committee on the Future’s meeting all
held on January 9th. He stated to accomplish the committee’s
purpose, the committee researches issues and prepares
recommendations on topics that will likely impact the county’s
quality of life twenty, thirty or more years ahead.
Dr. Miller announced he had the pleasure of providing a
district update to the Kiwanis Club of Midlothian-Chesterfield
and Midlothian Rotary Club. He stated Kiwanis International is
a global community dedicated to improving the lives of children
one community at a time. He also announced Comcast awarded a
total of $30,000 and 100 laptops to two Richmond organizations
– the YMCA of Greater Richmond and International Rescue
Committee (IRC) – which will be split equally and used to help
community members at both organizations with broadband
adoption, digital skills building and career opportunities.
Lastly, he announced he visited the county jail to speak with
participants of the HARP program on January 9th.
Mr. Ingle announced he attended Three Kings Day which was held
January 7th at St. Augustine’s Catholic Church. He also
announced he attended the MLK, Jr. Service Awards breakfast
hosted by the Chester YMCA. He stated among the honorees was
15-year-old, Elijah Lee, a national advocate for children,
Elijah is the founder of Hear Our Voices. He noted the
organization is dedicated to empowering young people with an
emphasis on assisting youth in finding their voices and
becoming agents of change.
Mr. Carroll announced Parks and Recreation staff completed the
steps and path project at Cosby High School over the holiday
break. He stated the work included brush clearing, installing
a rock dust path and drainage pipe behind practice field fence.
He then announced he held two community meetings regarding the
Adaptive reuse of Old Matoaca Elementary School and a
District update to the Matoaca Women’s Club. In closing,
he announced he attended the VACo Chairperson’s Institute
January 20-21; the Fire Academy Graduation on December
16th; VACo/VML Local Government Day on January 18th; and a
meeting with Congressman Rob Wittman on January 23rd.
11. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS
11.A. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING MS. DEBBIE REED, INFORMATION
SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT, UPON HER RETIREMENT
Mr. Barry Condrey introduced Ms. Debbie Reed, who was present
to receive the resolution.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
23-6
1/4/2023
WHEREAS, Ms. Debbie Reed will retire from the Chesterfield
County Information Systems Technology Department on February
1, 2023 after providing 30 years of quality service to the
citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Reed has faithfully served the county in the
capacity of Senior Programmer Analyst, Lead Programmer Analyst
and Information Technology Specialist III for the Information
Systems Technology Department; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Reed worked with and supported Chesterfield
County Schools and many county departments including
Utilities, Treasurer, Commissioner of the Revenue, Accounting,
Budget and Management, General Services and Real Estate
Assessor; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Reed was instrumental in delivering key
systems for her customers including the Chesterfield County
Quality System, Waste and Resource Recovery Point of Sale
System, Year 2000 Mainframe Conversion, Special Tax Districts,
Recycling Fee System, Taxation and Revenue Management System,
Mainframe Migration and Decommissioning project and Tax Relief
Credit System; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Reed is devoted to continuous learning,
completing many technology courses while graduating from the
Chesterfield University Total Quality Improvement program and
the Chesterfield University Employee Leadership Institute; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Reed worked tirelessly to complete the Real
Estate Mortgage Information Taxation System and the Customer
Assisted Land Information Assessments System; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Reed is proficient in a wide variety of
technologies including Structured Query Language, Visual
Basic, Microsoft Access, Microsoft .Net Technologies,
Microfocus Software and many Mainframe technologies; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Reed consistently exceeded expectations on
her annual employee development program evaluations with many
outstanding ratings; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Reed has received many accolades,
recognitions and awards over the years for her professionalism,
diligence, subject matter expertise, creative ideas and on-
time delivery of project requests; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors
will miss Ms. Reed’s diligent service, calm demeanor and
pleasant personality.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 25th day of January 2023,
publicly recognizes Ms. Debbie Reed, and extends on behalf of
its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County,
appreciation for her service to the county, congratulations
upon her retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Ms. Reed, and that this resolution
be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County.
23-7
1/4/2023
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
Mr. Carroll presented an executed resolution to Ms. Reed,
expressed appreciation for her valuable service and
contributions to the county, and wished her a happy retirement.
Dr. Casey presented Ms. Reed with an engraved brick, expressed
appreciation for her exceptional and faithful service to the
county, and wished her well in her retirement.
Ms. Reed thanked the Board of Supervisors for the special
recognition and kind sentiments.
A standing ovation followed.
12. NEW BUSINESS
12.A. APPOINTMENTS
12.A.1. CHESTERFIELD COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
nominated/appointed Ms. Pamela Steele as an At-large
Representative to the Chesterfield Community Services Board
with a term effective January 1, 2023, through December 31,
2025.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.A.2. COMMUNITY CRIMINAL JUSTICE BOARD
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
nominated/appointed appoint Ryan M. Jones, Chief Magistrate,
Chesterfield County, to the Community Criminal Justice Board
for the remainder of a two-year term, effective immediately
and will expire June 30, 2023.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.A.3. COMMUNITY POLICY AND MANAGEMENT TEAM
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
nominated/appointed Mr. Christopher Campbell and Ms. Elaine
Gould, PhD, to serve on the Community Policy and Management
Team, whose terms are effective immediately and will expire
December 31, 2024.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.A.4. COMMITTEE ON THE FUTURE
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
nominated/appointed Ms. Amy B. Hart to serve on the Committee
on the Future representing the Midlothian District, whose term
is at the pleasure of the Board.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
23-8
1/4/2023
12.A.5. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
nominated/reappointed Mr. Rick Young, Bermuda District and Mr.
Dunn Dillard, Clover Hill District, to serve on the
Chesterfield County Airport Advisory Board, whose terms are
effective February 15, 2023 and will expire February 14, 2026.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.A.6. CRATER PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
nominated/appointed Dr. Mark S. Miller to serve on the Crater
Planning District Commission, whose term is effective
immediately and will expire December 31, 2023.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.A.7. RICHMOND REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
ORGANIZATION
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
nominated/appointed Dr. Mark S. Miller, Midlothian District
Supervisor, to replace Mr. Jim Ingle, Bermuda District
Supervisor, as the alternate on the RRTPO for a term effective
immediately and expiring December 31, 2023.
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the County of Chesterfield is a member
organization of the Richmond Regional Transportation Planning
Organization (RRTPO); and
WHEREAS, the RRTPO policy board is composed of local
elected officials and officials of public agencies; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article III, Section 1 of the Bylaws,
the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield
designates Mr. Jim Ingle as an alternate to serve in place of
an absent representative;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield as follows:
1. The Board of Supervisors appoints Mark S. Miller, Ph.D.
to serve as an alternate in place of an absent representative.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B. CONSENT ITEMS (12.B. - 12.B.9.)
12.B.1. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS
12.B.1.a. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING FIREFIGHTER MICHAEL D.
OAKES, FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT, UPON HIS RETIREMENT
23-9
1/4/2023
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Firefighter Michael D. Oakes retired from the
Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Chesterfield
County, on October 1, 2022, and has faithfully served the
County for twenty-one years in various assignments; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Oakes graduated from Recruit School
#30 and served as a firefighter at the Midlothian, Wagstaff,
Dale, Centralia, Airport, Winterpock, Phillips, Courthouse,
Clover Hill, Buford, and Harrowgate Fire and EMS Stations; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Oakes served as a Peer Support Team
member beginning in 2009; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Oakes served as an Emergency Medical
Technician at the Paramedic level beginning in 2010; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Oakes served as a member of the
Yearbook Committee beginning in 2010; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Oakes served on the Engine and Truck
Standards of Cover committee beginning in 2011; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Oakes was awarded an EMS Unit
Citation for his involvement in the successful outcome of a
citizen who suffered cardiac arrest as a result of an overdose
on April 27, 2011; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Oakes was awarded a Unit Lifesave
for his involvement in the successful outcome of a citizen who
suffered cardiac arrest on November 17, 2015; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Oakes was awarded a Unit Citation
for his involvement in the successful outcome of a structure
fire on January 17, 2016; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Oakes was awarded a Unit Lifesave
for his involvement in the successful outcome of a citizen who
suffered cardiac arrest on January 11, 2018; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Oakes was awarded a lifesave and Unit
Citation for his involvement in the successful outcome of a
citizen who was suffering respiratory arrest on April 4, 2019;
and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of
Firefighter Michael D. Oakes, expresses the appreciation of
all citizens for his service to the county, and extends their
appreciation for his dedicated service and their
congratulations upon his retirement.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
23-10
1/4/2023
12.B.1.b. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING MR. LESLIE RITCHEY, JR.,
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, UPON HIS
RETIREMENT
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Leslie R. Ritchey, Jr. retired from the
Chesterfield County, Department of General Services, Waste and
Resource Recovery Division effective January 1, 2023, after 23
years of service; and
WHEREAS, on November 29, 1999, Mr. Ritchey was hired as a
Cashier in the Waste and Resource Recovery Division (WARR);
and
WHEREAS, in 2000, Mr. Ritchey was promoted to Senior
Landfill Operator, and in 2007 with expanded responsibilities,
became a Principal Labor Crew Chief; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ritchey was selected as the convenience
center’s “Employee of the Year” in 2001 and 2007 for his
outstanding contributions; and
WHEREAS, in 2002, Mr. Ritchey graduated from the School
of Quality and Continuous Improvement; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ritchey was a key member of the Waste and
Resource Recovery Division’s Environmental Health and Safety
Management Team which achieved ISO 14001 and Virginia
Department of Environmental Quality Extraordinary
Environmental Enterprise certifications; and
WHEREAS, in 2013, Mr. Ritchey took over as the county’s
Hazardous Waste Coordinator and assisted departments in the
safe and proper disposal of hazardous waste; and
WHEREAS, in 2014, Mr. Ritchey became WARR’s Assistant
Operations Manager; and
WHEREAS, in 2020, Mr. Ritchey provided outstanding
leadership during the Coronavirus pandemic to ensure that
citizens continued to receive outstanding and safe service;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ritchey contributed over 5000 volunteer hours
working with the Chesterfield Police in the Motor Assist
Program, helping citizens and ensuring their safety; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ritchey always performed his duties and
responsibilities in an efficient manner placing the welfare
and safety of co-workers, other county employees, and the
public above his own personal comfort and feelings and will be
missed by his fellow co-workers.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding
contributions of Mr. Leslie R. Ritchey, Jr., expresses the
appreciation of all citizens for his service to Chesterfield
County, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service to
the County, congratulations upon his retirement, and best
wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
23-11
1/4/2023
12.B.1.c. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING MR. RICHARD FORD,
INFORMATION SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT, UPON
HIS RETIREMENT
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Richard Ford will retire from the
Chesterfield County Information Systems Technology Department
on February 1, 2023 after providing 19 years of quality service
to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ford has faithfully served the county in the
capacity of Senior Production Control Operator, Production
Services Team Leader, Lead Analyst, System Administrator,
Information Technology Specialist II and Information
Technology Specialist III for the Information Systems
Technology Department; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ford worked with, and supported, Chesterfield
County Schools and many county departments including Utilities,
Treasurer, Commissioner of the Revenue, Accounting, Building
Inspections, Planning, Budget and Management, Environmental
Engineering and Human Resources; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ford was instrumental in delivering key
systems for his customers including the InFocus Enterprise
Resource Planning System, Tax Management System, Computer Aided
Mass Appraisal System, Enterprise Land Management System and
Mainframe Migration and Decommissioning; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ford worked tirelessly in the computer room
providing round the clock support of critical county
applications and networks; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ford demonstrated a willingness to grow and
learn and was promoted to provide administration and
configuration services for county enterprise systems; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ford is devoted to continuous learning,
completing over 40 classes and always taking the opportunity
to grow his technical knowledge; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ford consistently received ratings of
outstanding and exceptional on his annual employee development
plan reviews; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ford has received many accolades,
certificates of appreciation and awards over the years for his
professionalism, creative ideas and on-time delivery of project
requests; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors
will miss Mr. Ford’s diligent service, calm demeanor and
pleasant personality.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 25th day of January 2023,
publicly recognizes Mr. Richard Ford, and extends on behalf of
its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County,
appreciation for his service to the county, congratulations
upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
23-12
1/4/2023
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Mr. Ford, and that this resolution
be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.1.d. AUTHORIZATION AND RESOLUTIONS OF SUPPORT FOR
TRANSPORTATION PROJECT RAISE GRANTS
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized staff to submit three transportation project RAISE
grant requests and adopted the following resolutions of support
for the projects:
WHEREAS, the Rebuilding American Infrastructure with
Sustainability and Equity discretionary grant program funds
multi-modal, multi-jurisdictional transportation projects of
significant local or regional impact; and
WHEREAS, the RAISE grant program will fund capital and
planning surface transportation projects that will improve
safety, environmental sustainability, quality of life,
mobility and community connectivity, economic competitiveness
and state of good repair through partnership, collaboration
and innovation.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County requests RAISE capital
project grant funding for the Route 150/Route 60 Interchange
and Multi-modal Improvements project.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby agrees
to pay 20% of the total estimated cost for the project.
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Rebuilding American Infrastructure with
Sustainability and Equity discretionary grant program funds
multi-modal, multi-jurisdictional transportation projects of
significant local or regional impact; and
WHEREAS, the RAISE grant program will fund capital and
planning surface transportation projects that will improve
safety, environmental sustainability, quality of life,
mobility and community connectivity, economic competitiveness
and state of good repair through partnership, collaboration
and innovation.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County requests RAISE planning
project grant funding for the Hopkins Road (Beulah Road –
Chippenham Parkway) Interchange Improvement and Road Diet
project.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby agrees
to pay 20% of the total estimated cost for development of plans
for the project.
23-13
1/4/2023
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Rebuilding American Infrastructure with
Sustainability and Equity discretionary grant program funds
multi-modal, multi-jurisdictional transportation projects of
significant local or regional impact; and
WHEREAS, the RAISE grant program will fund capital and
planning surface transportation projects that will improve
safety, environmental sustainability, quality of life,
mobility and community connectivity, economic competitiveness
and state of good repair through partnership, collaboration
and innovation.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County requests RAISE planning
project grant funding for the Powhite Parkway Extended, Phase
II project.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.2. REAL PROPERTY REQUESTS
12.B.2.a. ACCEPTANCE OF PARCELS OF LAND
12.B.2.a.1. ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ADJACENT TO
ASHLAKE PARKWAY FROM ASHLAKE CROSSING, LLC
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.065
acres adjacent to Ashlake Parkway from Ashlake Crossing, LLC
and authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.2.a.2. ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ADJACENT TO NORTH
ENON CHURCH ROAD FROM THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.100
acres adjacent to North Enon Church Road from the Economic
Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield and
authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.2.a.3. ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ADJACENT TO
MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE FROM RCB PROPERTIES, LLC
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.095
acres adjacent to Midlothian Turnpike from RCB Properties, LLC
and authorized the County Administrator to execute the deed.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
23-14
1/4/2023
12.B.2.b. CONVEYANCE OF EASEMENTS
12.B.2.b.1. TO CONSIDER CONVEYANCE OF COUNTY OWNED RIGHTS OF
WAY TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FOR TRAFFIC
SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS ALONG ROUTE 1
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board set
February 22, 2023, as the date to hold a public hearing to
consider the conveyance of .7867 acres of county owned right
of way along Route 1 to the Commonwealth of Virginia for Traffic
Signal Improvements.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.2.c. REQUESTS TO QUITCLAIM
12.B.2.c.1. REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A PORTION OF A 16’ DRAINAGE
EASEMENT ACROSS PROPERTY OWNED BY TERRAFORGE
VENTURES, LLC
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a
portion of a 16’ drainage easement across the property owned
by Terraforge Ventures, LLC.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.2.c.2. REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A 16’ SEWER EASEMENT AND A
PORTION OF A 20’ SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS THE
PROPERTY OWNED BY ASHLAKE TRAILS, LLC
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a
16’ sewer easement and a portion of a 20’ sewer easement across
the property owned by Ashlake Trails, LLC.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.2.c.3. REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A PORTION OF A 20’ SEWER
EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY OWNED BY ASHLAKE
CROSSING, LLC
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a
portion of a 20’ sewer easement across the property owned by
Ashlake Crossing, LLC.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
23-15
1/4/2023
12.B.2.c.4. REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A PORTION OF A 16’ SEWER
EASEMENT ACROSS PROPERTY OWNED BY STEMMLE
ENTERPRISES LLC
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a
portion of a 16’ sewer easement across the property owned by
Stemmle Enterprises LLC.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.2.c.5. REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A PORTION OF A WATER
EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY OWNED BY INNOVATION
REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a
portion of a water easement across the property owned by
Innovation Real Estate Holdings, LLC.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.2.c.6. REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A PORTION OF A VARIABLE
WIDTH SWM/BMP EASEMENT ACROSS PROPERTY OWNED BY
HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES, INC.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a
portion of a variable width SWM/BMP easement across the
property owned by Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.2.c.7. REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM PORTIONS OF A 16’ WATER
EASEMENT AND A PORTION OF A 16’ SEWER EASEMENT
ACROSS PROPERTY OWNED BY STANLEY MARTIN HOMES,
LLC
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate
portions of a 16’ water easement and a portion of a 16’ sewer
easement across the property owned by Stanley Martin Homes,
LLC.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
23-16
1/4/2023
12.B.2.c.8. REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM SWM/BMP EASEMENTS ACROSS
THE PROPERTIES OWNED BY MOORES LAKE DEVELOPMENT,
LLC, MOORE’S LAKE, LLC AND EMERSON-ROPER
COMPANIES LLC
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate
SWM/BMP easements across the properties owned by Moores Lake
Development, LLC, Moore’s Lake, LLC and Emerson-Roper
Companies LLC.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.2.d. REQUESTS FOR PERMISSION
12.B.2.d.1. DESIGNATION OF A PARCEL OF LAND FOR COGBILL PARK
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved the designation of a parcel of land containing 0.346
acres as public right of way for Cogbill Park.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.3. AUTHORIZE USE OF DISTRICT ENHANCEMENT CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT FUNDS (DECIF)
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the use of District Enhancement Capital Improvement
funds, including authorization to advertise and award
construction contracts and change orders, up to the full amount
budgeted for each project, and execution of any agreements
necessary to complete the projects.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.4. TRANSFER FUNDING AND AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
FOR THE INDIAN SPRINGS ROAD EXTENSION AND DRAINAGE
PROJECT
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
authorized the Director of Procurement to award a construction
contract to Shirley Contracting Company, LLC in the amount of
$1,737,195, appropriated and transferred a total of $1,200,000
from existing projects, and executed all necessary change
orders up to the full amount budgeted for the Indian Springs
Road Extension and Drainage Project.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.5. APPROPRIATION OF CHESTERFIELD TRANSIENT LODGING TAX
COLLECTIONS ABOVE THE BUDGETED LEVEL TO FUND
IMPROVEMENTS AT RIVER CITY SPORTSPLEX
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
appropriated Chesterfield transient lodging tax collections
23-17
1/4/2023
above the budgeted amount to fund improvements at River City
Sportsplex.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.6. APPROVAL OF THE JANUARY 25, 2023 REVISION OF THE
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AIRPORT MINIMUM STANDARDS
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved the January 25, 2023, revision to the Chesterfield
County Airport Minimum Standards.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.7. ACCEPTANCE OF STATE ROADS
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a plat
recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets
meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Sections 33.2-705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia,
and the Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this
resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project/Subdivision: The Grove At Lucks Lane
Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways:
Additions
Reason for Change: New Subdivision Streets
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
• Woodlet Meadow Lane, State Route Number 8458
From: Dogwood Grove Drive, (Route 8459)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.09 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 275, Page 92
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Woodlet Meadow Lane, State Route Number 8458
From: Lucks Lane, (Route 720)
To: Dogwood Grove Drive, (Route 8459), a distance of
0.05 miles
23-18
1/4/2023
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 275, Page 92
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Dogwood Grove Drive, State Route Number 8459
From: Woodlet Meadow Lane, (Route 8458)
To: Lucks Garden Trail, (Route 8460), a distance of
0.13 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 275, Page 92
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Lucks Garden Trail, State Route Number 8460
From: Dogwood Grove Drive, (Route 8459)
To: Northward to cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.06 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 275, Page 92
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
• Lucks Garden Trail, State Route Number 8460
From: Dogwood Grove Drive, (Route 8459)
To: Southward to cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.06 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 275, Page 92
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a plat
recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets
meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Sections 33.2-705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia,
and the Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project/Subdivision: Sundial Farms Section 6 at the
Highlands
Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways:
Additions
Reason for Change: New Subdivision Streets
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
• Amara Drive, State Route Number 8154
From: 0.05 miles north of Galatea Place, (Route 8250)
To: Calypso Lane, (Route 7912), a distance of 0.04
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 287, Page 99
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
23-19
1/4/2023
• Amara Drive, State Route Number 8154
From: Calypso Lane, (Route 7912)
To: Iasius Terrace (Route 8455), a distance of 0.11
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 287, Page 99
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Amara Drive, State Route Number 8154
From: Iasius Terrace, (Route 8455)
To: Amara Court (Route 8456), a distance of 0.13 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 287, Page 99
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Amara Drive, State Route Number 8154
From: Amara Court, (Route 8456)
To: Amara Place, (Route 8457), a distance of 0.08 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 287, Page 99
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Amara Drive, State Route Number 8154
From: Amara Place, (Route 8457)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.25 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 287, Page 99
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Calypso Lane, State Route Number 7912
From: 0.26 miles east of Europa Drive, (Route 7734)
To: Amara Drive, (Route 8154), a distance of 0.03 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 287, Page 99
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Calypso Lane, State Route Number 7912
From: Amara Drive, (Route 8154)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.08 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 287, Page 99
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Iasius Terrace, State Route Number 8455
From: Amara Drive, (Route 8154)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.05 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 287, Page 99
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Amara Court, State Route Number 8456
From: Amara Drive, (Route 8154)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.07 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 287, Page 99
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
• Amara Place, State Route Number 8457
From: Amara Drive, (Route 8154)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.05 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 287, Page 99
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a plat
recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets
meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
23-20
1/4/2023
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Sections 33.2-705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia,
and the Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project/Subdivision: Harpers Mill Parkway East Extension
Type Change to the Secondary System Miles of State Highways:
Addition
Reason for Change: New Subdivision Street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
• Harpers Mill Parkway, State Route Number 7600
From: 0.01 miles northeast of Deeley Lane, (Route 7723)
To: Thirsk Lane, (Route 7719), a distance of 0.26 miles
Recordation Reference: Deed Book 7114, Page 794; Plat
Book 166, Pages 38-48
Right of Way width (feet) = 90
• Harpers Mill Parkway, State Route Number 7600
From: Thirsk Lane, (Route 7719)
To: 0.01 miles northeast of Thirsk Lane, (Route 7719),
a distance of 0.01 miles
Recordation Reference: Deed Book 7114, Page 794; Plat
Book 166, Pages 38-48
Right of Way width (feet) = 90
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a plat
recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets
meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Sections 33.2-705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia,
and the Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project/Subdivision: Austin Woods Apartments Phase 1 Road
Plan
Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways:
Additions
23-21
1/4/2023
Reason for Change: New Subdivision Streets
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: §33.2-705, 33.2-334
Street Name and/or Route Number
• Austin Woods Drive, State Route Number 8435
From: 0.19 miles southeast of Sagle Woods Drive, (Route
8436)
To: Addison Gate Drive, (Route 3437), a distance of
0.10 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 275, Page 3
Right of Way width (feet) = 51
• Austin Woods Drive, State Route Number 8435
From: Ironbridge Road, (Route 10)
To: Sagle Woods Drive, (Route 8436), a distance of 0.07
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 275, Page 3
Right of Way width (feet) = 66
• Austin Woods Drive, State Route Number 8435
From: Sagle Woods Drive, (Route 8436)
To: 0.19 miles southeast of Sagle Woods Drive, (Route
8436), a distance of 0.19 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 275, Page 3
Right of Way width (feet) = 51
• Sagle Woods Drive, State Route Number 8436
From: Austin Woods Drive, (Route 8435)
To: The end-of-maintenance, a distance of 0.04 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 275, Page 3
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
• Addison Gate Drive, State Route Number 8437
From: 0.15 miles southeast of Ironbridge Road, (Route
10)
To: Austin Woods Drive, (Route 8435), a distance of
0.09 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 275, Page 3
Right of Way width (feet) = 51
• Addison Gate Drive, State Route Number 8437
From: Ironbridge Road, (Route 10)
To: 0.15 miles southeast of Ironbridge Road, (Route
10), a distance of 0.15 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 275, Page 3
Right of Way width (feet) = 51
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.8. SET PUBLIC HEARING
12.B.8.a. TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF A 12’
ALLEY, A PORTION OF LOT 7, AND LOTS
8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23 AND
A PORTION OF OPEN SPACE, BLOCK A, WITHIN MAP OF A
PART OF THE VILLAGE OF BENSLEY
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board set
February 22, 2023, as the date to hold a public hearing to
consider the vacation of a portion of a 12’ alley, a portion
of Lot 7, and Lots
23-22
1/4/2023
8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23 and a portion of
Open Space, Block A, within map of a part of The Village of
Bensley.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.8.b. TO CONSIDER POINT OF ROCKS CODE AMENDMENT
(22J0116)
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board set
February 22, 2023, as the date to hold a public hearing to
consider Point of Rocks code amendment (22J0116).
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.8.c. TO CONSIDER BELLWOOD ESTATES CODE AMENDMENT
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board set
February 22, 2023, as the date to hold a public hearing to
consider Bellwood Estates code amendment.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
12.B.9. AMENDMENT TO STREET LIGHT POLICY
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved the amended Street Light Policy.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
13. FIFTEEN-MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
Mr. Will Shewmake addressed the Board relative to issues
regarding visual blight of electronic message signs and public
access to county codes via the Municode library.
14. DEFERRED ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS
There were no deferred items from previous meetings.
15. REQUESTS FOR MANUFACTURED HOME PERMITS AND REZONING
PLACED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA
Ms. Susan Wilson stated for each case on the consent agenda,
staff has received written confirmation from the applicants
that they agree with the conditions being imposed and all
proffers are offered in compliance with state law.
22SN0041
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Norris' Septic Tank
Business from the Home is a request for conditional use to
permit a septic tank business from the home and amendment of
23-23
1/4/2023
zoning district map in a Residential (R-7) District on 0.83
acre known as 200 South Providence Road. Density will be
controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Suburban Residential II use (2 to 4 dwellings per acre). Tax
ID 759-704-2293.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 22SN0041. She stated staff received
no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Carroll called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
approved Case 22SN0041, subject to the following conditions:
1. Use. This Conditional Use approval shall be for the
operation of a business (septic tank service business),
incidental to a dwelling. (P)
2. Non-Transferable Ownership. This Conditional Use approval
shall be granted exclusively to Peggy Flinn Norris and John
Flinn and shall not be transferable with the land. (P)
3. Time Limitation. This Conditional Use shall be granted
for a period of five (5) years. (P)
4. Location of Use. The use shall be confined to the existing
dwelling, accessory buildings and the parking of vehicles
in the graveled parking area that is noted on Exhibit A,
dated December 7, 2022, titled “Concept Plan”. All work
and operations associated with this business shall be
accomplished on the inside of the existing dwelling or
structures. There shall be no exterior additions or
alterations to the existing structures to accommodate this
use. (P)
5. Outside Storage. Outside storage of materials shall be
prohibited. (P)
6. Employees and Clients. No more than three (3) employees
shall be permitted to work on the premises, other than
family member employees that live on the premises. No
clients shall be permitted on the property.
a. Parking for employees shall be permitted in the front
yard, as shown on Exhibit A. No more than five (5)
vehicles shall be parked in the employee and personal
parking areas within the front yard, as shown on
Exhibit A. (P)
7. Equipment/Vehicles. As a part of this business, the
following equipment may be stored on the property:
a. Two (2) tanker trucks
b. Two (2) vans
c. Two (2) trailers
d. One (1) mini excavator
e. One (1) skid steer.
23-24
1/4/2023
All driveway and parking areas where these vehicles and
equipment travel or are parked shall be graveled. However,
the driveway access from South Providence Road to the
existing gate may be upgraded to asphalt. Vehicles and
equipment associated with the business shall be parked in
the area behind the fence and gate, screened from view of
South Providence Road and the adjoining properties to the
south and west. (P)
8. Effluent Storage in Vehicles. No vehicles associated with
this use may return to or be parked at this location unless
all effluent associated with this use has been properly
disposed of. (P)
9. Signage. There shall be no signs identifying this use. (P)
10. Group Assembly. Group assembly connected with this
operation shall be prohibited. (P)
11. Hours of Operation. The operation of the business (septic
tank service business), to include the movement of
equipment, shall be limited to Monday through Friday from
7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and Saturday from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00
p.m. There shall be no operation of the use on Sunday. (P)
12. Deliveries. No deliveries shall be permitted before 8:00
a.m. and after 6:00 p.m. (P)
13. Fence, Driveway Gate & Landscaping. The following
improvements shall be maintained on the property.
a. A six (6) foot tall opaque vinyl privacy fence and an
opaque vinyl driveway gate shall be maintained as
shown on Exhibit A. In addition, the existing six (6)
foot tall fence chain-link and slat fence along the
side and rear property lines (as shown on Exhibit A)
shall also be maintained. These fences and gate shall
provide screening of the business vehicles and
equipment parking area from South Providence Road and
the adjoining properties to the north, south and west.
b. Foundation and fence plantings shall be maintained
along the frontage of the dwelling and the portion of
the vinyl privacy fence visible to South Providence
Road, as shown on Exhibit B. (P)
14. Solid Waste Storage Area. The solid waste storage area
shall be maintained in the area depicted on Exhibit A to
minimize its view from South Providence Road. The solid
waste storage area shall be serviced according to Ordinance
requirements. (P)
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
22SN0091
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Hurtado Two Family
Dwelling is a request for conditional use to permit a two-
family dwelling (attached to existing home) and amendment of
zoning district map in a Residential (R-7) District on 1 acre
23-25
1/4/2023
known as 340 Ravenscroft Drive. Density will be controlled by
zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive
Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Suburban
Residential II use (2 to 4 dwellings per acre). Tax ID 744-
705-4356.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 22SN0091. She stated staff received
no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Carroll called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved Case 22SN0091, subject to the following conditions:
1. Occupancy. Occupancy of the second dwelling unit shall be
limited to the occupants of the principal dwelling unit,
individuals related to them by blood, marriage, adoption,
or guardianship, foster children, personal guests, and
household employees. (P)
2. Deed Restriction. For the purpose of providing record
notice, prior to the issuance of any building permit for
the property, a deed restriction shall be recorded setting
forth the limitation in Condition 1. The deed book and
page number of such restriction and a copy of the
restriction as recorded shall be submitted to the Planning
Department. (P)
3. Two-Family Dwelling.
a. Exterior Doors. No additional exterior doors facing
Ravenscroft Drive shall be permitted for the two-
family dwelling.
b. Architecture. The materials used to construct the
attached second dwelling shall be compatible with
the materials used for the principal dwelling.
c. Size. The maximum size of the attached second
dwelling shall be 800 square feet.
d. Height. The height of the attached second dwelling
shall be no taller than the height of the principal
dwelling. (P)
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
22SN0094
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Smith Family Day Care Home
is a request for conditional use to permit a family day care
home and amendment of zoning district map in a Residential (R-
7) District on 0.45 acre known as 8701 Wadsworth Court. Density
will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards.
The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate
for Suburban Residential II use (2 to 4 dwellings per acre).
Tax ID 754-702-8631.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 22SN0094. She stated staff received
no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission and staff
23-26
1/4/2023
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Carroll called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the Board
approved Case 22SN0094, subject to the following conditions:
1. Non-Transferable Ownership. This conditional use approval
shall be granted to and for Bellatina Smith, exclusively,
and shall not be transferable nor run with the land. (P)
2. Duration of Use. This use shall be granted for five (5)
years from date of approval. (P)
3. Expansion of Use. There shall be no exterior additions or
alterations to the existing structure to accommodate this
use. (P)
4. Signage. There shall be no signs permitted to identify
this use. (P)
5. Number of Children. This conditional use approval shall
be limited to providing care, protection, and guidance to
a maximum of twelve (12) children, other than the
applicant's own children, at any one time. (P)
6. Hours and Days of Operation. Hours and days of operation
shall be limited to 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday. (P)
7. Outdoor Play Areas. Any outdoor play area and/or
recreational equipment utilized by the family day-care
home shall be located in the side or rear yard of the
property. Equipment for outdoor play areas shall be
located no closer than fifteen (15) feet to the side or
rear property lines. (P)
8. Employees. No more than one (1) employee shall be
permitted to work on the premises at any given time, other
than family member employees that live on the premises.
(P)
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
22SN0124
In Dale Magisterial District, Courtyard Road Rehabilitation
Treatment Facility is a request for conditional use to permit
a substance use disorder treatment facility and amendment of
zoning district map in Neighborhood Business (C-2) District on
5.23 acres known as 6701 Court Yard Road. Density will be
controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Neighborhood Business use. Tax ID 772-658-8612.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 22SN0124. She stated staff received
no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission and staff
23-27
1/4/2023
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Carroll called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
approved Case 22SN0124, subject to the following conditions:
1. The sole operator of this facility shall be Summit
Behavioral Healthcare of Franklin, TN or one of its
wholly-owned subsidiaries. (P)
2. The use of this facility shall be limited to a ninety (90)
bed inpatient residential treatment facility with the
following licensed services:
a. American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) Level
3.7: Substance Use Medically Monitored Intensive
Inpatient for Adults
b. ASAM Level 3.5: Clinically Managed High Intensity
Residential Care for Adults
c. ASAM Level 2.5: Substance Abuse Partial
Hospitalization Service for Adults (P)
3. Within two (2) years of the facility opening, the owner
shall provide a minimum of fifteen additional on-site
parking spaces to accommodate the intended staffing level.
These spaces shall be located immediately west of the
existing parking area. (P)
4. Prior to the facility opening, the owner shall install a
four-foot decorative metal fence along the east and south
property lines. (P)
5. Prior to the facility opening, the owner shall install a
streetlight at the intersection of the facility’s driveway
and Courtyard Road. (P)
6. Prior to the facility opening, the owner shall install
exterior security cameras to monitor all entrances and
exits to the building and courtyards. (P)
7. Any areas exterior to the existing building and courtyards
to be used as part of the substance use disorder treatment
program shall be enclosed with a secured privacy fence or
a secured privacy wall. (P)
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
22SN0125
In the Midlothian Magisterial District, Goode Special Events
Venue is a request for conditional use to permit a special
events venue incidental to a dwelling and conditional use
planned development for exceptions to ordinance requirements
and amendment of zoning district map in an Agricultural (A)
District on 5 acres known as 16716 Genito Road. Density will
be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The
23-28
1/4/2023
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Suburban Residential I use (Maximum of 2 dwellings per acre).
Tax ID 709-689-1733.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 22SN0125. She stated staff received
no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Carroll called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved Case 22SN0125, subject to the following conditions:
1. Non-Transferable Ownership and Occupancy. This
Conditional Use shall be granted to Elizabeth and Jonathan
Goode exclusively and shall not be transferable nor run
with the land. (P)
2. Use Limitation. This Conditional Use shall be for the
operation of a special events business to permit, but not
be limited to, weddings/receptions, movie sets/photo
shoots, reunions, church gatherings, corporate functions,
seasonal festivals, and picnics. Event activities and
associated parking shall be limited to the areas depicted
in Exhibit A – Proposed Layout Exhibit. (P)
3. Time Limitation. This Conditional Use shall be granted
for a period not to exceed five (5) years from the date
of approval. (P)
4. Maximum Number Guests. The number of special events guests
shall not exceed 150 guests. (P)
5. Hours of Operation and Group Assembly. Special events
shall take place Saturdays from 3:00 p.m. – 11:00 p.m.
(P)
6. Improvements Serving Special Events Center Use.
Improvements serving the special events business use shall
be limited to those improvements currently existing on
the Property and one additional pole barn structure
constructed within the General Area of Events on Exhibit
A. (P)
7. Public Address. Use of an outside public address system
shall be limited to live and/or amplified music. Noise
generated by this system shall not exceed 65 dBa as
measured at the parcel boundaries. (P)
8. Surface Parking Treatment. Parking surfaces shall contain
a natural/grass surface. (P)
9. Access Drive. A twelve (12) foot wide gravel driveway as
generally depicted on Exhibit B – Driveway Exhibit shall
be constructed and maintained on the Property prior to
the first event authorized by this conditional use. There
shall be an additional three (3) foot clear area beyond
the edges of the driveway. This driveway will connect to
23-29
1/4/2023
the existing internal gravel drive and shall serve as the
access to the parking areas shown on Exhibit A. (P)
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
22SN0130
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Eddy Two Family Dwelling is
a request for conditional use to permit a two-family dwelling
and amendment of zoning district map in an Agricultural (A)
District on 2.63 acres known as 12412 Second Branch Road.
Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance
standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Rural Residential/Agricultural use. Tax ID
733-646-9719.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 22SN0130. She stated staff received
no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Mr. Carroll called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the Board
approved Case 22SN0130, subject to the following conditions:
1. Occupancy Limitations: Occupancy of the second dwelling
unit shall be limited to the occupants of the principal
dwelling unit, individuals related to them by blood,
marriage, adoption or guardianship, foster children,
personal guests, and household employees. (P)
2. Deed Restrictions: For the purpose of providing record
notice, prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy for the second dwelling unit, a deed restriction
shall be recorded setting forth the limitation in
Condition 1. The deed book and page number of such
restriction and a copy of the restriction as recorded
shall be submitted to the Planning Department. (P)
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
22SN0136
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Jason Haney Tattoo Shop is a
request for conditional use to permit a tattoo shop and
amendment of zoning district map in Community Business (C-3)
District on 0.68 acre known as 4515 West Hundred Road. Density
will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards.
The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate
for Neighborhood Mixed use. Tax ID 788-653-3591.
Ms. Wilson introduced Case 22SN0136. She stated staff received
no comments on the case, and the Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
23-30
1/4/2023
Mr. Carroll called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
approved Case 22SN0136, subject to the following conditions:
1. This conditional use shall be granted to and for William
Haney only and shall not be transferable nor run with the
land. (P)
2. Tattoo shop shall be conducted in compliance with all laws
regulating such use. (P)
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
22SN0111
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Lyttle Properties Rezoning is
a request to rezone from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-
40) plus an exception to Section 18-60 of the Utility Ordinance
for connection to the public water and wastewater systems and
amendment of zoning district map on 62 acres known as 12500
Coalboro Road, located north of River Road, between Taylor Road
and Coalboro Road. Density will be controlled by zoning
conditions or ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Rural
Residential/Agricultural use. Tax ID 702-645-Part of 2422.
Mr. Harold Ellis introduced Case 22SN0111. He then reviewed
the summary of proposal and requests made by the applicant. He
stated the applicant is requesting to rezone sixty-two acres
from Agricultural District to Residential District to
facilitate the development of a residential subdivision with
up to thirty residential lots and exception to Section 18-60
of the utility ordinance for connection to the public water
and wastewater system. He noted the Planning Commission
recommended approval of both requests; however, staff only
recommends approval of Request I, because rezoning from
Agricultural District to Residential District complies with
the Comprehensive Plan which designates the property for Rural
Residential/Agricultural, which suggests the property to
appropriate for residential development at a maximum density
of one dwelling per five acres. He stated staff is recommending
denial of Request II because there are viable ways to extend
public water and wastewater service to the property. He noted
there are no existing topographic, underground utilities
conflicts, or system capacity limitations which would prevent
the extension of public water and wastewater service to the
subject property.
Discussion ensued relative to the cost estimate of the water
and wastewater connection requirements.
Mr. Carroll called for public comment.
Ms. Ann Miller, representing the applicant, provided a summary
of the proposal.
23-31
1/4/2023
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
approved Case 22SN0111, subject to the following condition:
1. Utilities - The owner/developer shall dedicate public
water and wastewater easements within the limits of the
property in locations approved by the Utilities Department
for future public water and/or wastewater line extensions.
Such dedications shall be done as part of the subdivision
plat process(es). (U)
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
22SN0118
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Hidden Oaks Event Center is
a request for conditional use to permit a special events venue
with conditional use planned development for exceptions to
ordinance requirements plus an exception to Section 18-60 of
the Utility Ordinance for connection to the public water system
and amendment of zoning district map in Agricultural (A)
District on 48.83 acres known as 2149 Reymet Road. Density will
be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Industrial use. Tax ID 798-665-8911.
Mr. Ingle recused himself due to financial conflict of interest
relative to the case.
Ms. Marianne Pitts introduced Case 22SN0118. She stated the
applicant is proposing a special events business including but
not limited to events such as weddings, wedding rehearsals,
rehearsal dinners, bridal luncheons, wedding receptions,
birthday parties, and fundraisers and will be limited to the
improvements currently on site. She further stated the property
is located in a mandatory public water and wastewater
connection area for new non-residential development. She noted
public water is not readily available to the property. She
stated the applicant is proposing to connect to the public
wastewater system and seeking an exception for the connection
to the water system. She noted the Planning Commission
recommended approval of both requests; however, staff does not
support Request II because the Utilities Department does not
support the exception request because there is a viable way to
serve this site with public water without topographical,
capacity, or other underground utility conflict issues.
Mr. Carroll called for public comment.
Ms. Renee Eldred voiced her support of the case.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
approved Case 22SN0118, subject to the following proffered
conditions:
23-32
1/4/2023
The Applicant in this case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of
the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance
of Chesterfield County, for themselves and their successors or
assigns, proffer that the property known as Chesterfield County
Tax Identification Number 798-665-8911-00000 (the “Property”)
under consideration will be used according to the following
proffer(s) if, and only if, the request submitted herewith is
granted with only those conditions agreed to by the Applicant.
In the event this request is denied or approved with conditions
not agreed to by the owner and Applicant, the proffer shall
immediately be null and void and of no further force or effect.
1. Master Plan. The Textual Statement, dated November 28,
2022, together with the Existing Improvements Exhibit
referenced herein, shall be considered the Master Plan.
(P)
2. Use: With approval of this Case Number 22SN0118, the
following conditional use shall be permitted on the
Property: the operation of a Special Events business
including events such as weddings, wedding rehearsals,
rehearsal dinners, bridal luncheons, wedding receptions,
birthday parties, and fundraisers (referred to herein as
the “Special Events Center Use”). The term “Special
Event,” as used herein, shall mean an event where the
Special Events Center Improvements (defined below) have
been rented for the purpose of engaging in the Special
Events Center Use, and a Special Event shall be permitted
to include an event that occurs on as many as two
consecutive days. (P)
3. Non-Transferable Ownership: This Conditional Use approval
shall be granted exclusively to 2149 Reymet Road, LLC,
and shall not be transferable with the land. (P)
4. Improvements Serving Special Events Center Use:
Improvements serving the Special Events Center Use (the
“Special Events Center Improvements”) shall be limited to
those improvements currently existing on the Property as
of the date when the Conditional Use is approved by the
Board of Supervisors for Chesterfield County. The Special
Events Center Improvements are generally shown on the
Existing Improvements Exhibit attached hereto as EXHIBIT
A. (P)
5. Access: Direct vehicular access to/from the Property shall
be limited to one (1) entrance/exit to Reymet Road. (T)
6. Police: Owner shall consult with Police Department prior
to each Special Event to determine whether off-duty police
presence will be required by Police for each Special Event
based on the number of individuals in attendance and
whether alcohol is being served. The Police Department
shall make the final decision as to the need and/or number
police officers required for each identified Special
Event. (Police)
7. Public Wastewater: Owner shall connect the Property to
public wastewater. (U)
And, further, the Board approved the following conditions
(REQUEST II):
23-33
1/4/2023
1. In the event the public water system is extended to within
200 feet of the property, the public water system shall
be extended to a point acceptable to the Utilities
Department, and all uses requiring domestic water shall
be connected to the public water system. (U)
2. The exception to the use of public water shall only apply
to this 48.83- acre parcel provided the use is limited to
a special events operation. Any development of the
property for additional lots or uses, other than the
aforementioned, shall be required to conform to the County
Code at that time for the provision of public water. (U)
Ayes: Carroll, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
16. PUBLIC HEARINGS
16.A. TO CONSIDER CODE AMENDMENTS RELATIVE TO ROSELAND
ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICT
Mr. Drew Noxon stated this date and time has been advertised
for the Board to consider code amendments relative to Roseland
Zoning Overlay District. He stated in 2020, the county embarked
on a plan to reorganize the proposed Roseland project. He
further stated in collaboration with the property owners, the
county began to work on a zoning overlay district with the
intent of retaining many of the high-quality design standards
and infrastructure needs from the 2008 Roseland rezoning
approval while modernizing many aspects of the project to meet
current and future needs. Upon adoption, he stated the zoning
overlay district would become part of the county’s zoning
ordinance. He further stated individual owners within the
zoning overlay district would have the option to rezone their
properties in accordance with those standards established by
the overlay, with the more specific features of particular
development proposals being reviewed during the rezoning
process. He noted the Planning Commission recommended approval
of the proposed amendments at their regular meeting on Tuesday,
November 15, 2022.
Mr. Carroll called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Dr. Miller, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
1997, AS AMENDED, BY ENACTING SECTIONS 19.1-391 THROUGH 19.1-395, AND
AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 19.1-570 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE
RELATIVE TO ROSELAND ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICT
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That Sections 19.1-391 through 19.1-395 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield,
1997, as amended, are enacted, and Section 19.1-570 is amended and re-enacted, to read
as follows:
Chapter 19.1
23-34
1/4/2023
ZONING
Sec. 19.1-391. Purpose and Intent of Roseland Zoning Overlay District.
The purpose of the Roseland Zoning Overlay District is to provide for a high-quality master-
planned mixed-use community. It is the intent of this District to allow for flexibility while
maintaining the high-quality development concepts envisioned by the approved Roseland
rezoning (Case 07SN0223) along with the guiding principles as set forth below:
• development of a high-quality, cohesive master-planned community offering a mix
of uses with a blend of suburban and urban environments;
• establishment of mixed-use nodes of varying levels of intensity from small-scale
neighborhood-oriented/village centers to larger activity centers which serve the
overall community;
• integration of different residential unit types and assorted lot sizes;
• establishment of a Linear Park system along the Tomahawk Creek corridor for the
enjoyment of Roseland’s residents and the general public;
• an interconnected trail network providing cycling and pedestrian opportunities
throughout the community including a “Mainline Trail” linking the Linear Park
system together with surrounding development;
• an adequate road network to address traffic impacts and create a safe and efficient
multimodal transportation network that promotes context-sensitive and innovative
design. Such network should provide interconnectivity and high-quality streetscapes
which serve as focal features for buildings and open spaces;
• buildings consisting of high-quality materials and design which provide visual
interest and durability to stand the test of time; and
• encourage protection and preservation of environmentally sensitive areas through the
use of alternative stormwater systems, low-impact development techniques and
establishment of significant greenspace along major stream corridors and throughout
the overall community.
The provisions of this district shall not supersede the approved conditions of Zoning Case
07SN0223. Upon adoption, zoning approval for individual ownership tracts may be
obtained, with more specific land uses and design details being provided for each
development tract. Any rezoning request submitted on property located within the Roseland
Zoning Overlay District boundaries shall comply with the standards provided herein and as
otherwise required by the Chesterfield County Zoning Ordinance, unless otherwise granted
by the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors where such approval would advance the
guiding principles above. Once rezoning is granted on an individual development tract, the
conditions of Zoning Case 07SN0223 shall be null and void within such tract.
Sec. 19.1-392. Zoning Districts and Areas of Applicability.
The Roseland Zoning Overlay District shall be comprised of the following area as shown on
the zoning maps, and as shaded in Figure 19.1-392.A.:
DIVISION 23. ROSELAND ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICT
23-35
1/4/2023
Sec. 19.1-393. Master Plan.
The purpose of the Master Plan is to serve as a conceptual development guide for the
Roseland Zoning Overlay District. The Master Plan is general in nature and provides for
flexibility of overall uses while depicting desirable locations for higher-density and/or mixed-
use nodes throughout the Roseland Zoning Overlay District, as well as flexibility for roadway
alignments throughout individual projects so long as connection points to adjoining roads
and/or parcels are in the general locations illustrated in the Master Plan below. The locations
of specific uses shall be determined at the time of rezoning and plans review, or as otherwise
required by the Zoning Ordinance through Schematic Plan approval. The Master Plan is
displayed in Figure 19.1-393.A.:
Figure: 19.1-
392.A.
Figure: 19.1-
393.A.
23-36
1/4/2023
Sec. 19.1-394. Use Districts.
The Roseland Zoning Overlay District shall be comprised of the following Use Districts, as
depicted in Figure 19.1-394.A. below. Descriptions of these Use Districts and their permitted
uses are provided as follows.
Figure: 19.1-
394.A.
23-37
1/4/2023
A. Suburban Residential District.
The purpose of the Suburban Residential District is to provide for lower density
detached single-family dwelling development comparable to that found in the
Hallsley community. Uses permitted in this district shall be limited to:
a. Single-family detached dwellings;
b. Recreational neighborhood facilities primarily serving the surrounding
residential community; and
c. Accessory dwelling units.
d. Development standards for the abovementioned uses are provided in
Sections 19.1-395.D. and 19.1-395.G.
B. Medium-Density Residential with Nodal Mixed-Use District.
The purpose of the Medium-Density Residential with Nodal Mixed-Use District is to
provide for detached single-family dwelling development with varying lot sizes,
townhomes and similar attached dwelling styles and medium-density multi-family
development. Mixed-use nodes containing higher density residential uses in
combination with limited commercial uses are desirable throughout this district and
should be developed as village centers for the surrounding residential communities.
Uses permitted in this district shall be limited to:
a. Single-family detached dwellings including cluster lots;
b. Townhomes and similar attached unit styles including two-family dwellings
and twin homes;
c. Multi-family residential uses;
d. Recreational neighborhood facilities primarily serving the surrounding
residential community;
e. Accessory dwelling units;
f. Office uses as permitted in the Corporate Office (O-2) District;
g. Commercial uses as permitted in the Community Business (C-3) District
except that the following uses shall be prohibited:
i. Automobile accessory store;
ii. Automobile rental;
23-38
1/4/2023
iii. Automobile sales;
iv. Automobile repair, excluding body, major engine or transmission;
v. Automobile service station, whether or not such station is manned;
vi. Automobile wash;
vii. Crematorium;
viii. Kennel, commercial;
ix. Recycling receiving center, excluding recycling drop-off bins; and
x. Except for office uses, and restaurants located on the top
floor/penthouse or rooftop of a building, no commercial/retail uses
shall be permitted above the ground floor of any building; and
h. Schools, public.
i. Development standards for the abovementioned uses are provided in
Sections 19.1-395.D., 19.1-395.E. and 19.1-395.G.
C. Commercial/High-Density Residential/Mixed-Use District.
The purpose of the Commercial/High-Density Residential/Mixed-Use District is to
provide for larger scale commercial, office and entertainment uses along with higher
density residential development. The intent of this district is to serve as the center of
activity for the Roseland community. Uses permitted in this district shall be limited
to:
a. Single-family detached dwellings including cluster lots;
b. Townhomes and similar attached unit styles including two-family dwellings
and twin homes;
c. Multi-family uses;
d. Office uses as permitted in the Corporate Office (O-2) District;
e. Commercial uses as permitted in the Community Business (C-3) District
except that the following uses shall be prohibited:
i. Automobile accessory store;
ii. Automobile rental;
iii. Automobile sales;
iv. Crematorium;
v. Kennel, commercial;
vi. Recycling receiving center, excluding recycling drop-off bins; and
vii. Except for office uses, and restaurants located on the top
floor/penthouse or rooftop of a building, no commercial/retail uses
shall be permitted above the second floor of any building.
f. Government buildings;
g. Schools, public;
h. Recreational establishments, commercial outdoor;
i. Recreational neighborhood facilities primarily serving the surrounding
residential community; and
j. Accessory dwelling units.
k. Development standards for the abovementioned uses are provided in
Sections 19.1-395.D., 19.1-395.E. and 19.1-395.G.
D. Public Facilities Use District (Old Hundred Elementary School site).
The purpose of the Public Facilities Use District is to provide for additional county
facilities on the site currently occupied by Old Hundred Elementary School. Uses
permitted in this district shall be limited to:
a. One (1) fire station;
b. Government buildings; and
c. Schools, public.
d. Development standards for the abovementioned uses are provided in
Sections 19.1-395.E. and 19.1-395.G.
23-39
1/4/2023
E. The following uses shall be permitted in all Districts:
a. Parks, public; and
b. One (1) water storage tank.
c. Development standards for the abovementioned uses are provided in
Section 19.1-395.G.
Sec. 19.1-395. Required Conditions of Roseland Zoning Overlay District.
A. Development Density.
1. The maximum density within the Roseland Zoning Overlay District shall not
exceed 4,509 dwelling units and 815,000 square feet of gross floor area
(gfa) of non-residential uses. There shall be no maximum gross floor area (gfa)
for public facilities.
2. The maximum densities permitted for each individual development tract shall not
exceed those provided in Figure 19.1-395.A.:
B. Road Network. The purpose of this section is to provide a hierarchy of street types,
their general locations and minimum design standards for roads within the Roseland
Zoning Overlay District.
Figure: 19.1-
395.A.
Development Tracts Acreage (approx.)Single-Family Townhome (and similar attached units)Multi-Family (apartment/condo)Non-Residential
Tract A 777.5 total
A.1. East of Woolridge Rd. 326.6 300 300 500 500000
A.2. North Hallsley 302.5 340 0 0 0
A.3. West of Woolridge Rd./east of Otterdale Rd. 42.3 0 0 250 30000
A.4. North of Old Hundred Rd. 106.1 80 120 250 30000
Tract B
272.5 333 333 333 60000
Tract C
Note: Max. 200 dwelling units on this Tract 95.4 200 Max. 50 of the 200 units Max. 50 of the 200 units 15,000
Tract D
Note: Max. 525 dwelling units on this Tract 117 Max. 100 of the
525 units
325 200 180000
Tract E
115.2 0 237 168 0
Tract F
30.2 91 OR 240 0 0
Tract G
Public Facilities Only 81.5 0 0 0 0
Totals 1489.3 815,000 total sq. ft.4,509 total residential units
23-40
1/4/2023
Figure 19.1-395.B. below shows the conceptual routing of roadways (arterial,
collector and local roads) within the Overlay District. The alignments of the major
roadways would connect to adjacent roads and/or neighboring projects in the general
locations illustrated in the figure below. Otherwise, these routes are general in nature
and depict a hierarchy of street types in order to support the desired development
pattern in Roseland. The alignment of each major roadway within a particular project
shall be determined by the property owner(s) during the rezoning and/or plans review
process, subject to approval by the Transportation Department. For local roads, the
alignment and connection points to other roadways shall be determined by the
property owner(s) and as approved by the Transportation Department during the
rezoning process and/or plans review process, notwithstanding what is shown below.
a. Design Standards. With the exception of Center Pointe Parkway, Old
Hundred Road and Otterdale Road, all public and private roadways
constructed within this Overlay District shall meet the minimum standards
below, unless otherwise required by the Transportation Department.
i. Street Trees. Where required, street trees shall be provided along both
sides of all public roads and private pavement when designed as a
street, in accordance with Section 19.1-252 or as otherwise provided
in the Zoning Ordinance, except that:
1. Street trees shall be located in buffer strips between the
sidewalk and street curb, or in tree fixtures (tree grates, tree
wells or planter boxes) within sidewalks. Roseland Avenue
and Brightwalton Road (Section A) shall be exempt from this
provision.
Figure: 19.1-
395.B.
23-41
1/4/2023
2. For commercial, office and buildings containing non-
residential and residential uses within the same building, street
trees shall be placed no less than 35 feet on center.
ii. Buffer Strips. Where required, buffer strips shall be a minimum of
six (6) feet wide from the outside edge of the street curb to the edge of
any sidewalk.
iii. Sidewalk Clear Zones. Where fixtures such as tree grates, tree wells,
or planter boxes are provided around street trees, a minimum clear
sidewalk zone shall be provided between any such fixture and any
structure, building, outdoor seating area or other obstruction. Where
non-residential uses abut the sidewalk, the clear zone shall be no less
than six (6) feet.
iv. Sidewalks. Sidewalks shall be provided on both sides of all roads,
except as otherwise provided in this section or as stated below:
1. Within the Suburban Residential District, where a road
segment contains a dead end/cul-de-sac, sidewalks shall be
placed on one (1) side of the road.
2. Within all single-family developments, sidewalks shall only be
required along one (1) side of loop streets. Such sidewalk shall
be located on the side directly abutting lots.
3. Shared-use paths may be provided in lieu of sidewalks on one
or both sides of any street.
4. For Mews Streets, where a sidewalk(s) is required by the
Transportation Department, such sidewalk may be placed
outside of the right-of-way within a public easement if
approved by the Director of Planning.
v. Shared-Use Paths. Shared-use paths shall be provided along the
roads specified in Table 19.1-395.B., and the following roads, unless
otherwise approved by the Transportation Department:
1. Center Pointe Parkway (Tomahawk Creek Road to Old
Hundred Road) if the owner elects to provide this off-site
improvement.
2. Old Hundred Road (Center Pointe Parkway to Woolridge Road
Extended).
3. Roseland Avenue, except when designed per Sections C.1. &
C.2.
4. Watkins Centre Parkway Relocated (Woolridge Road
Extended to the northern boundary of Tract D), except when
designed per Section D.2.
vi. Streetlights. Pedestrian-scale streetlights shall be installed as
follows:
1. Streetlights shall be placed on both sides of roads within multi-
family, commercial and mixed-use projects.
2. Streetlights shall be designed to enhance the pedestrian
character of a development and be compatible with the
development standards of the district. The design of fixtures,
poles and lamps shall be consistent along a road.
3. Streetlights shall have a consistent spacing in accordance with
the requirements of the Transportation Department.
23-42
1/4/2023
4. Fixture mounting heights shall not exceed 15 feet above
finished grade.
5. Fixtures shall be painted a neutral color.
vii. On-Street Parking Standards. On-street parking spaces shall be
permitted to satisfy the parking requirements for nonresidential uses,
townhomes and similar attached unit styles including two-family
dwellings and twin homes, and multi-family uses, subject to the
following standards:
1. More than 1/2 of the parking space adjoins the use.
2. Roads and private pavement shall narrow at intersections by
means of “bulb-outs/curb extensions” to the minimum width
necessary to accommodate the travel lanes of the associated
road or private pavement and the narrowed portion shall
include a tangent length sufficient to accommodate the width
of a crosswalk perpendicular to the curb line.
3. On-street parking spaces shall be properly identified.
4. These improvements shall be developed in conjunction with
projects they are intended to serve.
viii. Required Standards. Streets, whether public, or private pavement
designed as streets, shall be designed as specified in Table 19.1-395.B.
below. The options below are provided to allow flexibility where
development styles vary from suburban to more urban/more dense
forms. These standards are conceptually represented in Section 19.1-
395.B.a.ix.
23-43
1/4/2023
ix. Typical Street Sections. The street sections provided herein are
illustrative in nature and reflect typical streetscape designs to be
incorporated into all new development. Deviations from these typical
street sections may be necessary to accommodate turn lanes and other
improvements as required by the Transportation Department, and
other features deemed acceptable to the Transportation and Planning
Departments such as additional travel lanes, on-street parking, traffic
calming devices, bioswales or similar stormwater systems, on-street
bicycle accommodations, or where a shared-use path is provided in
lieu of a sidewalk. For the purpose of this section, dimensions
provided reflect minimum standards.
Major Arterial Roads (Sections A. – C.2.). These roads accommodate high volumes of
traffic and provide primary connections between neighborhoods and employment/retail
centers and to limited access roads.
Section A.
*Street Sections
Section A.
Section B.1.
Section B.2. (four travel lanes)
Section C.1.
Section C.2. (four travel lanes)
Section D.1.
Section D.2.
Section E.1.
Section E.2.
Section E.3.
Section F (option for one-way travel)
A.
B.1.B.2.C.1.C.2.D.1.D.2.E.2.E.3.
B.1.B.2.C.1.C.2.D.1.D.2.E.1.E.2.E.3.
B.1.B.2.D.1.E.1.E.2.
C.1.C.2.D.2.E.3.
A.C.1.C.2.D.1.D.2.E.1.E.2.E.3.
B.1.B.2.F.
A.B.1.B.2.
A.
C.1.C.2.D.1.D.2.E.1.E.2.E.3.
C.1.C.2.D.1.D.2.E.2.E.3.
F.
B.1.C.1.
C.1.C.2.D.1.D.2.E.2.E.3.
Major Arterials
Details
C.1.C.2.E.3.D.2.
Street Sections
Buffer strips (minimum 6 feet wide between back of curb and edge of sidewalk)
Collectors
Local Streets
Street tree fixtures such as tree grates, tree wells, or planter boxes
Sidewalks on both sides, except for Roseland Ave., or as otherwise permitted by
Section 19.1-395.B.a.iv
Sidewalk on one side
On-street parking clearly identified
On-street parking
Provides road frontage for a maximum of 10 single-family lots
Wide median accommodates future phased expansion for additional travel lanes
Buildings do not front/buffers required on abutting residential subdivisions
Buildings front/residential lots are rear-loaded
Street trees
Shared-use path on one side (optional for Brightwalton Rd.)
Sidewalks shall extend to the edge of the street curb.Treatment shall consist ofa
combination of materials such as concrete, brick or pavers
Notes:
* Unless otherwise noted in this chart, all roads are two lanes and provide for two-way travel.
** The Director of Planning may allow non-residential uses to front Street Sections B.1. & B.2. only where the Department of Transportation is unable to
111permit on-street parking on such streets.
Table 19.1-395.B. Required Standards - Street Design
The Director of Planning may grant flexibility regarding the provision of on-street
parking and/or sidewalk improvements where one side of the roadway is developed
for non-residential development and the opposite side is developed for residential
or lower-intensity development,or one side ofsuch roadway abuts a park,common
area or environmental feature.The aforementioned improvements may then be
applied to one side of such roadway
Applicable to Brightwalton Rd.from the current terminus in Hallsley to Mt.Hermon Rd.,
or for Roseland Ave. between Otterdale Rd. and Old Hundred Rd.
Applicable to any segment of Roseland Ave. and Brightwalton Rd. (**non-residential uses
may front where acceptable to Director of Planning)
Applicable to any segment of Roseland Ave. and Brightwalton Rd. (**non-residential uses
may front where acceptable to Director of Planning)
Applicable to any segment of Roseland Ave. and Brightwalton Rd./Required where non-
residential uses front/applicable to higher density residential uses
Applicable to any segment of Roseland Ave. and Brightwalton Rd./Required where non-
residential uses front/applicable to higher density residential uses
Applicable to any Collector where residential uses front
Required where non-residential uses front/applicable to higher density residential uses
Applicable where residential uses front
Applicable where residential uses front
Required where non-residential uses front/applicable to higher density residential uses
Mews Street
Design Requirements (details)
Sidewalks and shared-use paths may meander through landscaped areas or buffers
(outside r.o.w.)
23-44
1/4/2023
Section B.1.
Section B.2.
Section C.1.
Section C.2.
23-45
1/4/2023
Collector Roads (Sections D.1. & D.2.). These roads provide traffic access and circulation
within residential and commercial developments to/from major arterials to the local road
network and/or the ultimate destinations.
Section D.1.
Section D.2.
Local Roads (Sections E.1. – E.3.). These roads are for general traffic circulation within a
development and provide direct vehicular access to abutting properties and other
roads/streets.
Section E.1. Section E.2.
23-46
1/4/2023
Section E.3.
Mews Streets (Section F.). These streets are applicable for detached single-family dwellings
having their front entrance along a linear park or other green space. These streets function
as alleys, providing for the rear-loading of lots while providing required road frontage. If
public, these will be considered local roads.
x. Alleys. Alleys shall meet the following standards:
1. The minimum easement width shall be 18 feet.
2. For alleys accommodating one-way travel and serving 10 units
or less, the minimum pavement width shall be no less than 14
feet.
3. For alleys accommodating two-way travel and serving 20 units
or less, the minimum pavement width shall be no less than 18
feet.
4. For all other alleys, the minimum pavement width shall be no
less than 20 feet.
5. Pavement width shall be measured from face of curb to face of
curb, or edge of pavement to edge of pavement where curbs
and gutters are not required.
C. Parks (Linear Park and other), Trail System (not part of road design) and
Common Area. The purpose of this section is to provide for a network of open
spaces and trails throughout the Roseland Zoning Overlay District.
a. Linear Park and Main Line Trail. A Linear Park and Main Line Trail
shall be developed generally in the areas surrounding Tomahawk Creek
and connecting between Tomahawk Creek (Tract A.4.) and Brightwalton
Road Extended (Tract A.2 or combination of Tracts A.2. and C).
i. Main Line Trail. A shared-use path connecting to neighborhoods and
other points of interest within Roseland, as well as to the overall
county Bikeways & Trails network shall be provided. The Main Line
Section F.
23-47
1/4/2023
Trail is that portion of the Linear Park that will be approved and
maintained by the Department of Parks & Recreation. The trail shall
be paved with a minimum width of eight (8) feet and routed generally
parallel to Tomahawk Creek and in the locations as otherwise shown
in Figure 19.1-395.C. The trail shall be placed within a public access
easement. The Director of Planning may approve deviations in the
routing of the Main Line Trail when it is agreed upon by the
Environmental Engineering, Parks & Recreation and/or
Transportation Department(s) that a particular routing would not be
viable due to environmental, topographical or other constraints.
ii. Additional land along the Main Line Trail shall be dedicated to the
Linear Park system. The Linear Park shall include trails, in addition to
the Main Line Trail, along with other active and passive recreational
uses. The Linear Park shall either be maintained as common area
under a public access easement or dedicated as a public park upon
acceptance by the Department of Parks & Recreation. To ensure that
individual subdivisions or projects contain on-site recreational or other
amenities, additional Common Area shall be provided outside of the
areas designated as the Linear Park. The Linear Park and Common
Area shall be calculated as provided below:
1. For Tracts A.1., A.3., A.4., B, D, E and F, 12 percent of such
tract exclusive of any Resource Protection Area (RPA) shall
be provided as Common Area, subject to the following
provisions:
a. 50 percent of the Common Area required on each of
the above tracts, except for Tract F, shall be designated
as the Linear Park.
b. For the purposes of calculating the Linear Park and
Common Area, Tracts A.3. & D shall be treated as one
tract.
2. For Tracts A.2. and C, 10 percent of each tract exclusive of any
Resource Protection Area (RPA) shall be provided as Common
Area, subject to the following provisions:
a. Within Tract C, if townhomes and similar attached unit
styles including two-family dwellings and twin homes,
multi-family residential uses or non-residential uses are
developed, 12 percent of such tract exclusive of any
Resource Protection Area (RPA) shall be provided as
Common Area.
b. For any tract containing the Main Line Trail, 50 percent
of the Common Area required on such tract shall be
designated as the Linear Park.
3. Remaining Common Area on any tract which is located
outside of the Linear Park shall be distributed among each
individual subdivision or project within that tract as
determined at the time of zoning, and subject to the following
provisions:
a. For cluster single-family residential development, a
minimum of 30 percent of the required Common Area
shall be identified as “strategic common area”.
23-48
1/4/2023
b. Developments containing mixed-use buildings, or a
combination of non-residential buildings and multi-
family residential buildings shall include strategically
located public green spaces/plazas with commercial
uses fronting or facing such open spaces to create
small-scale urban village centers.
4. For trails located within a Resource Protection Area (RPA), a
maximum width of 100 feet shall be permitted to be calculated
towards the Linear Park requirement.
b. Trail System. Public and private trails, other than the Main Line Trail and
those within street rights-of-way, shall be provided throughout the
development. Figure 19.1-395.C. shows the conceptual routing of such
trails throughout the Overlay District.
\
i. Additional trails shall be provided as generally shown in Figure 19.1-
395.C. above and subject to the following provisions:
Figure: 19.1-
395.C.
23-49
1/4/2023
1. A minimum 10-foot wide paved shared-use path shall be
provided east of Woolridge Road Extended and terminating in
the vicinity of Little Tomahawk Creek. On-street bike lanes
may be provided in lieu of a shared-use path where a more
dense, urban development pattern is established.
2. A minimum 10-foot wide paved shared-use path shall be
provided either from Roseland Avenue or the Linear Park to
Tract G (Old Hundred Elementary School site).
ii. Connector Trails. Trail connections between the Linear Park/Main
Line Trail and any street, including its associated sidewalk system,
shall be a minimum of 8 feet wide and paved. Such trails shall be
placed within public access easements.
D. Residential Standards.
a. Detached Single-Family Residential Standards.
i. Within the Suburban Residential District, the following shall apply:
Notes for
Table 19.1-395.D.a.i.
[1] The area of a lot which
shares a common boundary
with a buffer, or bikeway
exclusive of the Linear
Park, may be reduced in
accordance with Sec. 19.1-
306 or as otherwise
permitted by the Zoning
Ordinance.
[2] For flag lots, road frontage
may be reduced to 30 feet
[3] Frontage on the terminus of
a stub street does not meet
the requirements for road
frontage unless through the
preliminary plat review
process it is determined that
extension of the stub street is
not needed to serve future
development.
[4] Setbacks may be impacted
by Buffer, Setbacks --
Generally, Permitted Yard
Encroachments (except as
otherwise specified in this
section for porches),
Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay
or Upper Swift Creek
Watershed regulations.
[5] Minimum setbacks shall be
increased where necessary to
obtain the required lot width
at the front building line.
Table 19.1-395.D.a.i. Required Conditions for Suburban Residential
District
Lots
For lots sharing a
property boundary
with Linear Park
A. Lot Standards
1. Lot area and width
a. Area (square feet) 15,000[¹] 11,500
b. Width (feet) 100 70
2. Lot coverage (maximum %) 30 40
B. Road frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes (feet)[²]
1. All lots
a. Permanent cul-de-sac 30 30
b. Radius of a loop street 30 30
c. Other roads[³] 50 50
C. Principal Building Setbacks (feet)[⁴]
1. Front yard[⁵]
a. Non cul-de-sac 40 40
b. Permanent cul-de-sac 25 25
c. Fronting (main entrance
faces) Linear Park
15 (10 to porches)
2. Interior side yard 15
10 (15 when
abutting lots are
≥ 15,000 sq. ft.
3. Corner side yard 35 30
4. Rear yard
a. Non through lot 25 25
b. Through lot 40 40
23-50
1/4/2023
ii. Within the Medium-Density Residential with Nodal Mixed-Use
District, the following shall apply:
iii. Within the Commercial/High-Density Residential/Mixed-Use
District, the following shall apply:
Notes for
Table 19.1-395.D.a.ii.
[1] For lots containing 5,000 sq.
ft. of area or less, a minimum
of 50% of the lots in a
subdivision shall be rear-
loaded.
[2] For flag lots, road frontage
may be reduced to 30 feet.
[3] Frontage on the terminus of
a stub street does not meet
the requirements for road
frontage unless through the
preliminary plat review
process it is determined that
extension of the stub street is
not needed to serve future
development.
[4] Setbacks may be impacted
by Buffer, Setbacks --
Generally, Permitted Yard
Encroachments (except as
otherwise specified in this
section for porches),
Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay
or Upper Swift Creek
Watershed regulations.
[5] Minimum setbacks shall not
be required to be increased
where necessary to obtain
the required lot width at the
front building line.
[6] Garage parking may satisfy
one (1) required parking
space however one (1)
additional parking space
shall be provided on the lot.
[7] Where a one (1) foot setback
is provided, no further
encroachments shall be
permitted into that setback.
Table 19.1-395.D.a.ii. Required Conditions for Medium-Density
Residential with Nodal Mixed-Use District
A. Lot Standards
1. Lot area and width
a. Area (square feet)[1]
5,000 (3,500 when
fronting on and having a
main/front entrance
facing the Linear Park
or common area)
b. Width (feet) 40
2. Lot coverage (maximum %) 50
B. Road frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes (feet)[2]
1. All lots
a. Permanent cul-de-sac 30
b. Radius of a loop street 20
c. Other roads[3] 40
C. Principal Building Setbacks (feet)[4]
1. Front yard[5]
a. Roseland Ave. (Sections B.1., B.2.,
C.1., & C.2. only) 20 (15 to porches)
b. Collector or local street 15 (10 to porches)
c. Fronting (main entrance faces)
Linear Park or common area 10 (5 to porches)
2. Interior side yard 5
3. Corner side yard 15
4. Rear yard
a. Non through lot 20
b. Alley (pavement) or mews street 10[6] (rear-loaded)
c. Through lot 25
D. Detached Accessory Buildings[6]
1. Interior side yard 1 one side[7], 3 one side
a. Occupied by an accessory dwelling
unit 5 on each side
2. Setback from alley (pavement) or
mews street 10
3. Building height 2 stories or 30 feet
23-51
1/4/2023
b. Townhomes and similar attached unit styles including two-family
dwellings and twin homes standards.
i. Within the Medium-Density Residential with Nodal Mixed-Use
District, the following shall apply:
Notes for
Table 19.1-395.D.a.iii.
[1] A minimum of 60% of the
lots in a subdivision shall be
rear-loaded.
[2] For flag lots, road frontage
may be reduced to 30 feet.
[3] Frontage on the terminus of
a stub street does not meet
the requirements for road
frontage unless through the
preliminary plat review
process it is determined that
extension of the stub street
is not needed to serve future
development.
[4] Setbacks may be impacted
by Buffer, Setbacks --
Generally, Permitted Yard
Encroachments (except as
otherwise specified in this
section for porches),
Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay
or Upper Swift Creek
Watershed regulations.
[5] Minimum setbacks shall not
be required to be increased
where necessary to obtain
the required lot width at the
front building line.
[6] Garage parking may satisfy
one (1) required parking
space however one (1)
additional parking space
shall be provided on the lot.
[7] Where a one (1) foot setback
is provided, no further
encroachments shall be
permitted into that setback.
Table 19.1-395.D.a.iii. Required Conditions for Commercial/High-
Density Residential/Mixed-Use District
A. Lot Standards
1. Lot area and width
a. Area (square feet)[1]
5,000 (3,500 when
fronting on and having a
main/front entrance
facing the Linear Park
or common area)
b. Width (feet) 40
2. Lot coverage (maximum %) 50
B. Road frontage for lots intended for dwelling purposes (feet)[2]
1. All lots
a. Permanent cul-de-sac 30
b. Radius of a loop street 20
c. Other roads[3] 40
C. Principal Building Setbacks (feet)[4]
1. Front yard[⁵]
a. Roseland Ave. (Sections B.1., B.2.,
C.1., & C.2. only) 20 (15 to porches)
b. Collector or local street 15[6] (10 to porches)
c. Fronting (main entrance faces)
Linear Park or common area 10 (5 to porches)
2. Interior side yard 5
3. Corner side yard 15
4. Rear yard
a. Alley (pavement) or mews street 10[6] (rear-loaded)
D. Detached Accessory Buildings[6]
1. Interior side yard 1 one side[7], 3 one side
a. Occupied by an accessory dwelling
unit 5 on each side
2. Setback from alley (pavement) or
Mews street 10
3. Building height 2 stories or 30 feet
23-52
1/4/2023
ii. Within the Commercial/High-Density Residential/Mixed-Use
District the following shall apply:
Notes for
Table 19.1-395.D.b.i.
[1] Within required common area,
except where lots abut a public
street or alley, a 5-foot-wide
common area shall be provided
around the perimeter of each group
of townhome lots and every 10 lots
for twin homes.
[2] A minimum of 50% of the lots in a
subdivision shall be rear-loaded.
Units fronting on or having a
main/front entrance facing a linear
park or other open space shall be
rear-loaded.
[3] The number of lots in each group of
townhomes shall not be required
to be varied throughout the
subdivision.
[4] All lots shall have frontage on a
road. If approved by the director of
transportation, lots may front on private pavement which has direct
access to a public road when the
private pavement is designed and
constructed in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 17 for alleys
and private pavement.
[5] Setbacks may be impacted by
Buffer, Setbacks -- Generally,
Permitted Yard Encroachments
(except as otherwise specified in
this section for porches),
Floodplain, Chesapeake Bay or
Upper Swift Creek Watershed
regulations.
[6] Minimum setbacks shall not be
required to be increased where
necessary to obtain the required lot
width at the front building line.
[7] No end unit setback shall be
required where a 10-foot-wide
common area is provided between
two rows of attached units containing a paved walkway
creating a pedestrian shortcut
between streets, alleys, parking
areas or adjacent development.
[8] Where primary entrances are
provided for individual units on
both streets on a corner lot/site,
porches may have the same corner
side yard setback as the front yard.
Table 19.1-395.D.b.i. Required Conditions for Medium-
Density Residential with Nodal Mixed-Use District
A. Subdivision Standards
1. Subdivision Size 5 acres
2. Density (per subdivision) No max.
3. Private Pavement Setbacks (feet)
a. Major arterial 50 where not rear-
loaded
b. Other road 15 where not rear-
loaded
4. Common Area[1] See Section 19.1-
395.C.
5. Maximum Number of
Attached Units in Each
Group
10
B. Lot and Building Standards[2][3]
1. Lot area (square feet) 1,500
2. Lot width (feet) 16
3. Lot coverage (max. %) 50, 70 (where rear-
loaded)
C. Road Frontage[4]
D. Principal Building Setbacks (feet)[5][6]
1. Major arterial all yards 50
a. Roseland Ave. (Sections
B.1., B.2., C.1., & C.2.
only)
15 (10 to porches)
2. Front yard 15 (10 to porches)
3. Side yard[7] 8
4. Corner side yard 15[8]
5. Rear yard
a. Setback from pavement
of alley 10
b. All other lots 20
E. Principal Building Height (maximum)
1. Located adjacent to or
across road from single-
family development
3 stories
2. All other buildings 4 stories
F. Accessory Building Requirements
1. Interior side yard None required
2. Setback from pavement of
alley 10
3. Building height 2 stories or 30 feet
23-53
1/4/2023
c. Multi-family standards.
i. Within the Medium-Density Residential with Nodal Mixed-Use
District, the following shall apply:
1. Project Standards.
Notes for
Table 19.1-395.D.b.ii.
[1] Within required common area,
except where lots abut a public street
or alley, a 5-foot-wide common area
shall be provided around the
perimeter of each group of
townhome lots and every 10 lots for
twin homes.
[2] A minimum of 60% of the lots in a
subdivision shall be rear-loaded.
Units fronting on or having a
main/front entrance facing a linear
park or other open space shall be
rear-loaded.
[3] The number of lots in each group of
townhomes shall not be required to
be varied throughout the
subdivision.
[4] All lots shall have frontage on a
road. If approved by the director of
transportation, lots may front on
private pavement which has direct
access to a public road when the
private pavement is designed and
constructed in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 17 for alleys
and private pavement.
[5] Setbacks may be impacted by
Buffer, Setbacks -- Generally,
Permitted Yard Encroachments
(except as otherwise specified in this
section for porches), Floodplain,
Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift
Creek Watershed regulations.
[6] Minimum setbacks shall not be
required to be increased where
necessary to obtain the required lot
width at the front building line.
[7] There shall be no required front yard
setback variation.
[8] No end unit setback shall be required
where a 10-foot-wide common area
is provided between two rows of
attached units containing a paved
walkway creating a pedestrian
shortcut between streets, alleys,
parking areas or adjacent
development.
Table 19.1-395.D.b.ii. Required Conditions for
Commercial/High-Density Residential/Mixed-Use
District
A. Subdivision Standards
1. Subdivision Size No min.
2. Density (per subdivision) No max.
3. Common Area[1] See Section 19.1-
395.C.
4. Maximum Number of
Attached Units in Each
Group
15
A. Lot and Building Standards[2][3]
1. Lot area (square feet) 1,400
2. Lot width (feet) 16
3. Lot coverage (max. %) 75
B. Road Frontage[4]
C. Principal Building Setbacks (feet)[5][6][7]
1. Major arterial all yards 50
a. Roseland Ave. (Sections
B.1., B.2., C.1., & C.2.
only)
15 (10 to porches)
2. Front yard
a. Collectors 15 (10 to porches)
b. Local streets 10 (5 to porches)
3. Side yard[8] 5
4. Corner side yard
a. Collectors 15 (10 to porches)
b. Local streets 10 (5 to porches)
5. Rear yard
a. Setback from pavement
of alley 10
b. All other lots 20
D. Principal Building Height
(maximum) 4 stories
E. Accessory Building Requirements
1. Interior side yard None required
2. Corner side yard 10 for local streets,
15 for collectors
3. Setback from pavement of
alley 10
4. Building height 2 stories or 30 feet
23-54
1/4/2023
2. Building Standards.
Notes for
Table 19.1-395.D.c.i.1.
[1] Access drives shall be those that
connect residential clusters to roads.
The number of required access points
shall be provided prior to occupancy
of the specified number of units.
[2] At time of plan review, additional
access points may be required.
[3] Applies to buildings containing non-
residential uses.
Table 19.1-395.D.c.i.1. Required Conditions for
Medium-Density Residential with Nodal Mixed-Use
District
Project Standards
A. Project Size
5 acres, no min. when
non-residential uses are
included within a
building
B. Density (per project) No max. density
C. Number of Accesses to Road[¹]
1. 50 units or fewer 1
2. 51 - 200 units 2
3. More than 200 units [²]
D. Pavement Width of
Access Drives (feet) 30
E. Pavement Width of
Other Drives (feet) 24
F. Parcel Coverage for
Project (max. % of
acreage)
50, no max. coverage[3]
23-55
1/4/2023
ii. Within the Commercial/High-Density Residential/Mixed-Use
District, the following shall apply:
1. Project Standards.
Notes for
Table 19.1-395.D.c.ii.2.
[1] Setbacks may be impacted by
Buffer, Setbacks -- Generally,
Permitted Yard Encroachments for
Principal Buildings, Floodplain,
Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift
Creek Watershed regulations.
[2] A multifamily building constructed
along a public road shall front the
road, except for Woolridge Road
Extended.
[3] Parking areas and drives shall be
located behind buildings as to not
be located between the rear wall of
a building and the street. Along
Woolridge Road Extended, parking
areas and drives shall not be
located between a building and the
road. This provision shall not
preclude necessary perpendicular
drives providing access to a site
from a road.
[4] Perimeter Landscaping J may be
satisfied by street trees located
within the street right-of-way.
Table 19.1-395.D.c.ii.2. Required Conditions for
Commercial/High-Density Residential/Mixed-Use District
Building Standards
A. Individual Building Setbacks (feet)[¹]/Required Perimeter
Landscaping
1. Project Property Lines
a. Adjacent to single-
family lot within
Overlay
10, No Perimeter
Landscaping required
b. All other adjacent uses
within Overlay
No setback or Perimeter
Landscaping required
2. Roads[²][³]
a. Roseland Ave., Sections
B.1., B.2., C.1. & C.2. 15/J[4]
b. Woolridge Rd. 40/C
c. Collectors, Section D.1. 10/J[4]
d. Collectors, Section D.2. No Setback or Perimeter
Landscaping required
e. Local Streets, Sections
E.1. & E.2. 10/J[4]
f. Local Streets, Section
E.3.
No Setback or Perimeter
Landscaping required
3. Interior private pavement
excluding parking spaces None required
4. Parking Spaces None required
5. Distance Between
Buildings None required
B. Dwelling Units Per Floor No maximum
C. Principal Building Height (maximum)
1. Located within 100 feet
of any single-family lot
within Overlay and 500
feet from any single-family
lot external to Overlay
3 stories
2. All other buildings 8 stories
D. Accessory Building Requirements
1. All Setbacks Same as principal buildings
23-56
1/4/2023
2. Building Standards.
Notes for
Table 19.1-395.D.c.ii.1.
[1] Access drives shall be those that
connect residential clusters to roads.
The number of required access points
shall be provided prior to occupancy
of the specified number of units.
[2] At time of plan review, additional
access points may be required.
Table 19.1-395.D.c.ii.1. Required Conditions for
Commercial/High-Density Residential/Mixed-Use
District
Project Standards
A. Project Size None required
B. Density (per project) No max. density
C. Number of Accesses to Road[¹]
1. 50 units or fewer 1
2. 51 - 200 units 2
3. More than 200 units [²]
D. Pavement Width of
Access Drives (feet) 30
E. Pavement Width of
Other Drives (feet) 24
F. Parcel Coverage for
Project (max. % of
acreage)
None required
23-57
1/4/2023
d. Residential Design Standards.
i. The following standards shall apply for all residential buildings to
include buildings containing amenities serving residential
communities:
1. Driveways shall be paved with concrete (textured or brushed)
or decorative pavers. Asphalt shall be permitted only for units
which are rear-loaded.
2. Any individual dwelling unit containing a primary/front
entrance on the exterior of the unit shall have a front porch or
other covered front entryway. Foundations or pilings shall
consist of materials matching the foundation of the dwelling.
3. Heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) units and
generators shall be screened from view of roads by
landscaping or fencing.
Notes for
Table 19.1-395.D.c.ii.2.
[1] Setbacks may be impacted by
Buffer, Setbacks -- Generally,
Permitted Yard Encroachments for
Principal Buildings, Floodplain,
Chesapeake Bay or Upper Swift
Creek Watershed regulations.
[2] A multifamily building constructed
along a public road shall front the
road, except for Woolridge Road
Extended.
[3] Parking areas and drives shall be
located behind buildings as to not
be located between the rear wall of
a building and the street. Along
Woolridge Road Extended, parking
areas and drives shall not be
located between a building and the
road. This provision shall not
preclude necessary perpendicular
drives providing access to a site
from a road.
[4] Perimeter Landscaping J may be
satisfied by street trees located
within the street right-of-way.
Table 19.1-395.D.c.ii.2. Required Conditions for
Commercial/High-Density Residential/Mixed-Use District
Building Standards
A. Individual Building Setbacks (feet)[¹]/Required Perimeter
Landscaping
1. Project Property Lines
a. Adjacent to single-
family lot within
Overlay
10, No Perimeter
Landscaping required
b. All other adjacent uses
within Overlay
No setback or Perimeter
Landscaping required
2. Roads[²][³]
a. Roseland Ave., Sections
B.1., B.2., C.1., & C.2. 15/J[4]
b. Woolridge Rd. 40/C
c. Collectors, Section D.1. 10/J[4]
d. Collectors, Section D.2. No Setback or Perimeter
Landscaping required
e. Local Streets, Sections
E.1. & E.2. 10/J[4]
f. Local Streets, Section
E.3.
No Setback or Perimeter
Landscaping required
3. Interior private pavement
excluding parking spaces None required
4. Parking Spaces None required
5. Distance Between
Buildings None required
B. Dwelling Units Per Floor No maximum
C. Principal Building Height (maximum)
1. Located within 100 feet
of any single-family lot
within Overlay and 500
feet from any single-family
lot external to Overlay
3 stories
2. All other buildings 8 stories
D. Accessory Building Requirements
1. All Setbacks Same as principal buildings
23-58
1/4/2023
4. Foundation plantings shall be required along the entire front
façade of all dwelling units and shall extend along sides of such
units facing a street. Foundation planting beds shall be a
minimum of four (4) feet wide from the unit foundation.
Planting beds shall include medium shrubs and may include
spreading groundcover. The plant materials used should
visually soften the unit corners and complement the
architecture of the home.
5. Garages permitted on front elevations of single-family
dwellings shall not exceed more than 50 percent of the width
of the front elevation of any dwelling unit. However, garages
may be permitted to take up a maximum of 60 percent of the
width of the front elevation when set back a minimum of two
(2) feet behind the front elevation.
6. Rear-loading of lots is encouraged throughout this Overlay
District, particularly within mixed-use/higher-density areas.
Where a minimum percentage of rear-loaded lots is required,
lots permitted to be front-loaded should be located in areas
where topography is not favorable for rear-loading, along local
streets which are not through streets, or along streets which do
not connect directly to non-residential or mixed-use areas.
E. Commercial, Office and Mixed-Use Standards.
a. Mixed-Use Buildings. For buildings containing a combination of residential
and non-residential uses, the following standards shall apply:
i. Within the Medium-Density Residential with Nodal Mixed-Use
District, multi-family residential, commercial and office uses shall be
permitted within the same building.
ii. Buildings shall have an architectural style compatible with
surrounding residential neighborhoods.
iii. Within the Commercial/High-Density Residential/Mixed-Use
District, multi-family residential, commercial, office uses and
government buildings shall be permitted within the same building.
iv. For all mixed-use projects, multi-family residential uses shall be
incorporated into an integrated master plan for the development
depicting the general location of uses, vehicular and pedestrian
accesses, parking areas, sidewalks, paths, and common areas.
Modifications determined not to affect the general intent,
interconnectivity and use mix of the plan may be approved at the time
of plans review.
b. Site Design Standards.
i. Shared Cross Access. Unless otherwise approved at the time of plans
review, direct and convenient on-site vehicular circulation and access
between properties shall be provided. The intent is to provide shared
access drives to minimize the need for numerous vehicular entrances
along public streets.
ii. Drive-in or Drive Through Facilities. Where permitted, drive-in or
drive through facilities shall comply with the following:
23-59
1/4/2023
1. Drive-in or drive through facilities to include windows, bays
or similar uses shall be arranged so as to minimize view from
streets and shall not be located between the front building
façade and roads; and
2. The view of stacking spaces from roads shall be minimized
either by a building, or 3 to 4-foot-high decorative walls,
fencing, evergreen hedges or a combination thereof. Hedges
shall be maintained at a height of 3 to 4 feet. The setback of
the walls, fencing or hedges shall meet the minimum building
setback unless a hardscaped pedestrian area is provided
between the road and the stacking spaces in which case the
walls, fencing or hedges shall be located between the stacking
spaces and the hardscaped pedestrian area. The Director of
Planning may modify the requirement for walls, fences or
hedges where stacking space views are minimized through the
use of decorative architectural, landscaping and/or topographic
features designed to reduce open views of stacking spaces
from the road and include improvements which accommodate
pedestrian travel across storefronts, between buildings, and
between sites.
iii. Gasoline Pumps and Associated Drives. Gasoline pumps shall be
located behind a building and arranged so as to minimize view from
roads. Views of pumps from other roads shall be minimized either by
a building, or 3 to 4-foot-high decorative walls, fencing, evergreen
hedges or a combination thereof. Hedges shall be maintained at a
minimum height of 3 to 4 feet so as to not impede pedestrian facilities.
The setback of the walls, fencing or hedges shall be a maximum of 15
feet unless a hardscaped pedestrian area is provided between the road
and the gasoline pumps in which case the walls, fencing or hedges
shall be located between the gasoline pumps and the hardscaped
pedestrian area. The Director of Planning may modify the
requirements for walls, fences or evergreen hedges where views are
minimized through the use of decorative architectural, landscaping
and/or topographic features designed to reduce views of pumps from
roads.
iv. Setbacks.
1. Buildings:
a. For commercial, office or buildings containing non-
residential and residential uses within the same
building, there shall be no setback from Brightwalton
Road or Roseland Avenue (Sections C.1. & C.2.),
collectors (Section D.2) or any local road (Section
E.3.).
i. As noted in Table 19.1-395.B., where the
Transportation Department is unable to permit
on-street parking along Brightwalton Road or
Roseland Avenue, the Director of Planning
may approve a setback no closer to the street
than the closest existing residential use(s)
fronting such street, or if no units exist, the
setback shall be 15 feet.
b. When located along Brightwalton Road or Roseland
Avenue (Section A), or Center Pointe Parkway, Old
23-60
1/4/2023
Hundred Road, Otterdale Road or Woolridge Road, the
setback shall be 40 feet with Perimeter Landscaping C.
c. When adjacent to a single-family use, the setback shall
be 20 feet.
d. When adjacent to townhomes and similar attached unit
styles including two-family dwellings and twin homes,
the setback shall be 10 feet.
e. There shall be no setback when adjacent to any multi-
family use or any building containing a mix of
residential and non-residential uses.
f. There shall be no rear setback, except that no building
shall be closer than 20 feet to any single-family use or
any townhomes and similar attached unit styles
including two-family dwellings and twin homes.
2. Parking Areas and Drives:
a. Within the Medium-Density Residential with Nodal
Mixed-Use District and the Commercial/High-Density
Residential/Mixed-Use District, when located adjacent
to Woolridge Road Extended, no closer to the road than
the façade of the nearest building facing the road and
in no case less than 40 feet with Perimeter Landscaping
C.
b. Along roads in the Medium-Density Residential with
Nodal Mixed-Use and the Commercial/High-Density
Residential/Mixed-Use Districts other than Woolridge
Road Extended, no closer to the road than the rear
façade of the building. If there is no building on the
property, the parking area shall be set back 15 feet from
the road. Views of parking areas from roads shall be
minimized by 3 to 4-foot-high decorative walls,
fencing, evergreen hedges or a combination thereof.
Hedges shall be maintained at a height of 3 to 4 feet.
c. For interior side yards or for rear yards located adjacent
to any residential use, the setback shall be 10 feet.
Within this setback, a minimum 6-foot-tall opaque
fence to include masonry columns, or a masonry wall
shall be provided along with evergreen trees planted 10
feet on center for the length of the fence or wall.
d. Vehicular drives shall not be located between a
building and a public road or private pavement
designed as a road. This provision shall not preclude
necessary perpendicular drives providing access to a
site from a road.
c. Building Standards.
i. Building Height:
1. Within the Medium-Density Residential with Nodal Mixed-
Use District:
23-61
1/4/2023
a. For buildings located across a road from any existing
single-family lot(s) external to this Overlay District,
building height shall not exceed three (3) stories.
b. When containing a mix of residential and non-
residential uses, building height may be increased to
five (5) stories except that such building shall be
located no closer than 400 feet from any single-family
lot(s) external to this Overlay District and 200 feet
from any single-family lot(s) within this Overlay
District.
c. For all other buildings, four (4) stories.
2. Within the Commercial/High-Density Residential/Mixed-Use
District:
a. For buildings located within 100 feet of any single-
family lot(s) interior to this Overlay District or 500 feet
from any single-family lot(s) within the Armistead
Village, Mallory Village and Sedwick Village
subdivisions, building height shall not exceed three (3)
stories.
b. For all other buildings, eight (8) stories.
ii. Size of Individual Uses. Within the Medium-Density Residential with
Nodal Mixed-Use District, individual nonresidential uses shall not
exceed 15,000 square feet of gross floor area per story. For office uses,
this provision shall only apply to the ground floor.
iii. Building Length and Pedestrian Short Cuts. Individual building
elevations shall not exceed 350 feet in length unless pedestrian short
cuts or passthroughs are provided to facilitate foot traffic between
parallel roads or from parking areas. The Director of Planning may
grant relief to this provision where it is determined that the intent to
provide frequent and reasonable pedestrian access through or across
sites is provided through other design means.
iv. Buildings Required to Front Roads. Any building abutting a road
shall architecturally front, and have main entrances which face such
road, except that for major arterials other than Roseland Avenue or
Brightwalton Road (Sections B.1., B.2., C.1. & C.2.), such buildings
shall only be required to architecturally front on and have main
entrances facing a secondary road, or private drive/parking area where
no secondary road abuts the building.
v. Windows and Pedestrian Entrances. The first floor of any building
façade facing a road or common area/plaza shall incorporate windows
and pedestrian entrances to activate the facade. A minimum of 70
percent of the width of the first-floor façade of the principal building
shall be glass. This provision shall not be required for facades which
face major arterials other than Roseland Avenue or Brightwalton Road
(Sections B.1., B.2., C.1. & C.2.).
vi. Deck Parking. Deck parking structures fronting on any road shall
have commercial, office or residential uses located along the ground
23-62
1/4/2023
floor, or be located behind another building located on the lot. For any
detached parking structures, such structures shall be designed to have
exterior materials and features that enhance the compatibility with
principal buildings located within a project.
d. Public Facilities.
i. Sections 19.1-395.E.b.i., E.b.ii. E.b.iv. E.c.ii., E.c.iii. and E.c.v. shall
not apply to fire stations, government buildings, public schools or
buildings accessory to public parks.
ii. When located within a mixed-use building, police stations, libraries
or other similar government uses (“government buildings”) shall
meet all provisions of Section 19.1-395.E.
F. Infrastructure, Public Facilities and Phasing.
a. Transportation.
i. To provide an adequate roadway system, the Property
Owner/Developer shall be responsible for the following road
improvements, with any modifications approved by the Transportation
Department:
1. Construct two (2) lanes of an East/West Major Arterial
(“Roseland Avenue”) from Old Hundred Road to Woolridge
Road Extended.
2. Construct two (2) lanes of an East/West Collector (“Watkins
Center Parkway Relocated”) from Woolridge Road Extended
to the northern boundary of Tract D.
3. Construct two (2) lanes of a North/South Major Arterial
(“Brightwalton Road Extended”) from the existing terminus to
Mount Hermon Road. This improvement may be constructed
to the western boundary of Tract C. if off-site right-of-way
cannot be acquired to provide the connection to Mount
Hermon Road, as approved by the Transportation Department.
4. Construct adequate left and right turn lanes along Woolridge
Road Extended, Roseland Avenue, Watkins Center Parkway
relocated, Old Hundred Road, Otterdale Road, Brightwalton
Road Extended, and Mount Hermon Road/Hallsboro Road at
each approved access and intersection, based on
Transportation Department standards.
5. Construct/Install intersection control (signalization,
roundabout, or alternative intersection) and intersection
improvements (adequate storage and receiving lanes) as
determined by the Transportation Department at:
a. Woolridge Road Extended/Watkins Center Parkway
Relocated
b. Woolridge Road Extended/Roseland Avenue
c. Woolridge Road Extended/Site Access
d. Roseland Avenue/Otterdale Road
e. Roseland Avenue/Site Access
f. Old Hundred Road/Site Access
6. Construct/Install intersection control (signalization,
roundabout, or alternative intersection) and intersection
23-63
1/4/2023
improvements (adequate storage and receiving lanes) as
determined by the Transportation Department at the Roseland
Avenue and Old Hundred Road intersection. (Improvement is
eligible for road cash proffer payment reduction as defined in
Section F.a.ii.)
7. Reconstruction of Old Hundred Road along the property’s
frontage to the centerline of the existing road to provide
adequate lane width and shoulder improvements, including
mill/overlay of full width of the road. (Improvement is eligible
for road cash proffer payment reduction as defined in Section
F.a.ii.)
8. Improve the Otterdale Road drainage crossing at Tomahawk
Creek to address the 100-year storm event, with modifications
approved by the Transportation Department. (Improvement is
eligible for road cash proffer payment reduction as defined in
Section F.a.ii.)
9. Reconstruction of Otterdale Road along the property’s
frontage to the centerline of the existing road to provide
adequate lane width and shoulder improvements, including
mill/overlay of full width of the road. (Improvement is eligible
for road cash proffer payment reduction as defined in Section
F.a.ii).
ii. At the option of the Owner/Developer and as approved by the
Transportation Department, road cash proffer payments, if any, may
be reduced for the cost of road improvements, other than those
identified in Sections F.a.i.1. through F.a.i.5., provided by the Property
Owner/Developer. The value of the road improvement(s) shall be
approved by the Transportation Department. The following off-site
road improvements are eligible for the road cash proffer reduction.
Any modifications shall be approved by the Transportation
Department.
1. Construction of additional two (2) lanes of Roseland Avenue
to provide a four (4)-lane facility from Old Hundred Road to
Woolridge Road Extended.
2. Reconstruction of Old Hundred Road from Midlothian
Turnpike (Route 60) to the Norfolk Southern Railroad tracks.
3. Construction of additional two (2) lanes of Woolridge Road to
provide a four (4)-lane divided facility from Old Hundred
Road to Lacoc Road.
4. Construction of two (2) lanes of Powhite Parkway Extended
from its current terminus at Watermill Parkway to Woolridge
Road.
5. Reconstruction of the intersection of Watermill Parkway and
Powhite Parkway Extended, including adequate storage and
receiving lanes, as determined by the Transportation
Department.
6. Construction of four (4) lane divided facility for Center Pointe
Parkway from Tomahawk Creek Road intersection to Old
Hundred Road, includes the Tomahawk Creek crossing, Old
Hundred Road/Center Pointe Parkway intersection
improvements and control, and pedestrian accommodations.
7. Intersection control (traffic signal, roundabout, or other
alternative intersection) at the Roseland Avenue/Old Hundred
Road intersection as defined in Section F.a.i.6. (This is limited
to one-half of the value of the improvement.)
23-64
1/4/2023
8. Reconstruction of Old Hundred Road as defined in Section
F.a.i.7.
9. Improvement to Otterdale Road drainage crossing at
Tomahawk Creek as defined in Section F.a.i.8.
10. Reconstruction of Otterdale Road as defined in Section F.a.i.9.
iii. Phasing of transportation improvements. In conjunction with
zoning application(s) for property within the Overlay District, a
phasing plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Transportation
Department to address the abovementioned road improvements to
ensure an adequate road network.
b. Utilities.
i. This area is located within the mandatory public water and wastewater
connection areas for both residential and non-residential uses. It is
anticipated that all proposed development within the overlay district
will utilize the public water and wastewater system to satisfy this
requirement while ensuring a sustainable and quality development
with a mixture of uses and densities.
ii. In order to ensure the proper and orderly expansion of the county’s
public water and wastewater systems and the area’s water and
wastewater demands are met, the water and wastewater infrastructure
shall be properly coordinated by the developers with engineering
studies and the development of an Overall Water and Wastewater
System Plan. These items will be reviewed and approved by the
Utilities Department.
iii. This area shall adequately provide for its needed water storage and
supply. This is currently envisioned to entail the construction of an
elevated water tank within the boundaries of this area and a new
secondary water main feed and flow control valve. This infrastructure
provides for better reliability and redundancy of the water supply that
supports the public safety and health needs of the area.
c. Linear Park and Main Line Trail.
i. A Master Plan for the “Linear Park” shall be provided for each
development tract at the time of zoning. Such plan shall include a
general routing for the Main Line Trail and supportive recreational
amenities.
ii. The Linear Park and Main Line Trail and supportive recreational
amenities shall be dedicated prior to Site or Subdivision Plan approval
for each phase of development.
iii. The Main Line Trail and supportive recreational amenities shall be
constructed with each phase of development.
d. Police Station.
i. One (1) site containing approximately two (2) acres for a Police
Station in the vicinity of Route 288 and Woolridge Road Extended.
e. Fire Station.
23-65
1/4/2023
i. There shall be no external building mounted sirens or public address
systems.
ii. Solid waste storage areas, fuel pumps and other similar uses,
regardless of their location on the site, shall be screened from view of
adjacent property and public rights-of-way by a masonry wall which
is constructed of comparable materials to, and designed to be
compatible with the fire station.
iii. Signage. Any freestanding identification or directional signage shall
be of a monument design constructed of masonry complementary to
the fire station building, and designed to be compatible with
identification signs for Old Hundred Elementary School. The exact
treatment and design of the signage shall be approved by the Director
of Planning.
G. Additional Provisions.
a. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). Accessory dwelling units shall meet the
following standards:
i. Accessory dwelling units shall be permitted only on lots containing
single-family detached dwellings.
ii. No more than one (1) accessory dwelling unit shall be permitted in
association with the principal dwelling unit on a lot.
iii. Occupancy shall be limited to the occupants of the principal dwelling
unit or individuals related to them by blood, marriage, adoption or
guardianship, foster children, personal guests, and household
employees.
iv. For the purpose of providing record notice, prior to the issuance of any
building permit for the property, a deed restriction shall be recorded
setting forth the limitation in Section 19.1-395.G.a.iii. above. The
deed book and page number of such restriction and a copy of the
restriction as recorded shall be submitted to the Director of Planning.
v. An accessory dwelling unit shall not contain more than one (1)
bedroom.
vi. No accessory dwelling unit shall exceed 40 percent of the gross floor
area of the principal dwelling on the lot when detached, or 40 percent
of the combined gross floor area of the principal dwelling and
accessory dwelling on the lot when attached.
vii. No entrance to an accessory dwelling unit shall be permitted on the
same facade of the principal dwelling as the main entrance to the
principal dwelling.
viii. Accessory dwelling units, whether detached or attached as an addition
to an existing principal dwelling, shall employ design and exterior
materials compatible with the principal dwelling.
23-66
1/4/2023
ix. For detached accessory dwelling units on single-family lots containing
5,000 square feet or less, units shall be located in the rear yard. This
provision shall also apply when attached to the principal dwelling by
a breezeway.
b. Off-Site Parking.
i. For non-residential uses, parking may be located on a lot other than
the zoning lot on which the use it serves is located, provided the
parking is located within 1,320 feet of such property. The property on
which the parking is located need not be zoned to permit the use which
it serves, provided parking for any nonresidential use may not be
located in areas zoned only for residential use.
c. Buffers.
i. Buffers shall be provided within common area.
ii. No buffers shall be required between different uses within this Overlay
District.
iii. For any property within this Overlay District which contains multi-
family uses, or townhomes or similar attached unit styles including
two-family dwellings and twin homes, and is adjacent to any parcel
external to this Overlay District which is occupied by a single-family
residential dwelling, a 50-foot buffer shall be required.
iv. When located along Center Pointe Parkway, Old Hundred Road,
Otterdale Road, or Brightwalton Road or Roseland Avenue (Section
A), buffers shall be provided as required by the Zoning Ordinance.
d. Water Storage Tank.
i. The water storage tank and any tank-mounted communications
equipment shall not exceed 199 feet in height from grade.
ii. The water storage tank is located no closer than 200 feet from any
dwelling.
iii. The water storage tank shall be white, grey or other neutral color
acceptable to the Utilities Department. Communications equipment
(antennas, mounting hardware, cables etc.) mounted on the outside of
the water tank shall be the same color or similar color as the water
tank.
iv. There shall be no signs or logos permitted on the water storage tank or
communications equipment.
e. Public Parks.
i. Outdoor playfields, courts, swimming pools and similar active
recreational areas shall be set back 100 feet from any single-family
residential lot and 50 feet from roads. Indoor facilities or parking shall
be permitted within the 100-foot setback. A 50-foot buffer, planted at
a density of 2.5 times Perimeter Landscaping C, shall be provided
within the 100-foot setback and along the perimeter of any active
recreational facilities except where adjacent to a road.
23-67
1/4/2023
ii. Playground areas (i.e., areas accommodating swings, jungle gyms or
similar such facilities) shall be no closer than 40 feet from any
property line. A 40-foot buffer, planted with Perimeter Landscaping
C, shall be provided along the perimeter of the facilities where
adjacent to any single-family residential lot.
f. Recreational Neighborhood Facilities.
i. Public address systems shall be permitted outside when accessory to
recreational neighborhood facilities primarily serving the surrounding
residential or mixed-use community, subject to the following:
1. Outdoor public speaker or address systems shall not be used
between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m., Sunday
through Thursday and 11:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m., Friday and
Saturday.
2. Public address systems shall not exceed 55 dBA, as measured
at the property lines of adjacent residential uses.
g. Projections Above the Rooflines of Buildings.
i. For all buildings, patios, decks, pergolas, canopies, planter boxes,
gardens or similar structures as determined by the Director of Planning
shall be permitted on rooftops so long as no structure exceeds 15 feet
above the roofline. Penthouses for the sole purpose of accessing
rooftop decks shall be included in this provision so long as such
structure does not exceed more than 25 percent of the aggregate area
of the roof of an individual unit.
1. Sec. 19.1-570. Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the following
meanings:
OOO
Dwelling, accessory: A dwelling unit that is subordinate to the principal dwelling located
on the same lot as the principal dwelling but is a complete, independent living facility
equipped with a kitchen and with provisions for sanitation and sleeping. An accessory
dwelling unit may be attached, including as an addition to the principal dwelling, or
detached, within a separate building.
OOO
Dwelling, twin home: A dwelling, which is entirely surrounded by open space or yards on
separate and abutting lots, containing only two dwelling units, each of which is totally
separated from the other, by a common solid wall.
OOO
Lot, cluster: Also known as small-lot single-family development. This development style
utilizes smaller single-family lots clustered with common areas or other open spaces
which compensate for decreased lot sizes and/or greater densities.
OOO
Park, linear: An active and/or passive outdoor area of linear design that provides or
connects recreation, parkland, or open space areas.
23-68
1/4/2023
OOO
Rear-loaded: A lot which has frontage on a street but has sole vehicular access from the
rear of the lot either by alley or mews street.
OOO
Street, mews: A street which meets the minimum geometric design criterion for
incorporation into the VDOT/state roadway system. Such street provides road frontage
for residential lots which have their fronts on or have their main entrances facing a park,
common area or other open space. Such street is utilized for the rear-loading of lots where
alleys are not permitted.
OOO
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately after adoption.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
16.B. TO CONSIDER THE EXERCISE OF EMINENT DOMAIN FOR THE
ACQUISITION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE NASH ROAD
EXTENSION PROJECT
Mr. Brent Epps stated this date and time has been advertised
for the Board to consider the exercise of eminent domain for
the acquisition of right-of-way for the Nash Road Extension
Project.
Mr. Carroll called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Winslow, the Board
approved the exercise of eminent domain for the acquisition of
right-of-way and easements for the Nash Road Extension Project.
Ayes: Carroll, Ingle, Winslow, Holland and Miller.
Nays: None.
17. REMAINING MANUFACTURED HOME PERMITS AND ZONING REQUESTS
There were no remaining manufactured home permits and zoning
requests.
18. FIFTEEN-MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
There were no requests to address the Board at this time.
19. ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Mr. Winslow, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adjourned at 7:58 p.m. until February 22, 2023, at 2:00 p.m.
for a work session to be held in the Public Meeting Room.
23-69
1/4/2023
__________________________ ___________________________
Joseph P. Casey Kevin P. Carroll
County Administrator Chairman