2026-05-27 Minutes BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES MAY 27, 2026
5/27/2026 Page 1 of 95
2 p.m. Work Session - Administration Building, Room 502
A video recording of this meeting may be viewed at
https://www.chesterfield.gov/244/Agendas-and-Minutes.
Supervisors in Attendance:
Dr. Mark S. Miller, Chair
Mr. Kevin P. Carroll, Vice Chair
Mr. James A. Ingle, Jr.
Ms. Jessica L. Schneider
Dr. LeQuan M. Hylton
Dr. Joseph P. Casey
County Administrator
Dr. Miller called the meeting to order at 2 p.m. He
stated that Dr. Hylton would be arriving late to the
meeting.
1. Certification of 15-Day Closed Session Pursuant to Sections 2.2-3711(A)(1) and 2.2-3712(B), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, Solely for the Purpose of Interviewing Candidates for the Position of County Administrator
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day
adjourned into Closed Session in accordance with a
formal vote of the Board and in accordance with the
provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information
Act; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act
effective July 1, 1989 provides for certification
that such Closed Session was conducted in conformity
with law.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Board of
Supervisors does hereby certify that to the best of
each member’s knowledge, i) only public business
matters lawfully exempted from open meeting
requirements under the Freedom of Information Act
were discussed in Closed Session to which this
certification applies, and ii) only such business
matters were identified in the motion by which the
Closed Session was convened were heard, discussed or
considered by the Board. No member dissents from this
certification.
Mr. Ingle: Aye.
Ms. Schneider: Aye.
Dr. Hylton: Absent.
Mr. Carroll: Aye.
Dr. Miller: Aye.
2. Approval of Minutes
5/27/2026 Page 2 of 95
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Mr. Ingle,
the Board approved the minutes of the April 22, 2026,
Board of Supervisors meeting, as submitted.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle and Schneider.
Nays: None.
3. Requests to Postpone Agenda Items and Additions, Deletions or Changes in the Order of Presentation
There were no requests to postpone agenda items and
additions, deletions or changes in the order of
presentation.
4. Everyday Excellence - Sheriff's Office
Sheriff Karl Leonard introduced Dr. Mantovani Gay to
be recognized for Everyday Excellence. He stated that
Dr. Gay epitomizes everything about patient advocacy.
He further stated that Dr. Gay is the longest-
tenured, non-sworn member of the organization. He
stated that Dr. Gay and his team do a remarkable job,
and Chesterfield County is blessed to have him.
Dr. Gay expressed appreciation for the recognition
and stated he has stayed in his position this long
because he feels connected to the county, Sheriff's
Office, and his team.
Board members thanked Dr. Gay for his exceptional
work and dedication to his patients.
5. Work Sessions
A. Sheriff's Office Annual Update
Sheriff Leonard, accompanied by Lieutenant Colonel Matt
Wilkerson, provided the Board with an annual update on
the activities and initiatives of the Sheriff's Office. He
provided details of rising costs and demands being
experienced by the department. He discussed main courthouse
improvements, employee demographics, and hiring initiatives.
He focused on his civilian workforce, which includes the
Criminal Information Unit, Mental Health Team,
Programs/Rehabilitation Team, Medical Team, and Security
Specialists. He provided details of the COMPASS
(Comprehensive Opioid Management and Patient Assistance for
Substance Support) Program. He reviewed challenges of the
department, including one-on-one assignments for inmates who
are a serious threat to harming themselves, the major
heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) overhaul at
the jail, the elevator overhaul at the main courthouse, the
shift away from consolidated services, space concerns at the
courthouse and jail, and hiring and recruitment.
Dr. Hylton joined the meeting at 2:11 p.m.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the information
provided during the presentation.
B. Older Adults Programs and Partnerships Update
Deputy County Administrator James Worsley introduced
Yong Tucker with The Span Center; Rachel Ramirez with
the Lifelong Learning Institute (LLI); Tonya Leabough
with Parks and Recreation; Julie Carlton with
5/27/2026 Page 3 of 95
Sportable; and Kimberly Graves from Community
Engagement and Resources. Each speaker provided
details of the activities and initiatives of their
respective organizations as they relate to programs
for older adults.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided during the presentation.
C. American Revolution 250th Commemoration
Director of Community Engagement and Resources
Kimberly Conley and Director of Parks and Recreation
Neil Luther provided the Board with an update on the
county's programs relative to the American Revolution
250th commemoration.
D. Finance Update
Deputy County Administrator Matt Harris and Director
of Budget and Management Gerard Durkin provided the
Board with a Finance Update. Topics discussed
included the setting of a public hearing to consider
creation of the Sawmill Community Development
Authority (CDA); the setting of a public hearing to
consider amending the County Code relative to partial
tax exemption for real property improvements (also
known as the Rehabilitation Ordinance); the setting
of a public hearing to consider dissolution of the
Centerpointe Service District; an update on General
Obligation (Schools) and Revenue (facility
maximization and major maintenance) bond financing;
FY2026 budget amendments; and other upcoming items.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided during the presentation.
E. State Legislative Update
Intergovernmental Relations Director Natalie Spillman
provided the Board with a General Assembly update.
She stated the county continues to push for the
funding priorities outlined, sent and shared with
committee chairs and budget conferees, including
continued investment in K-12 education, the local one
percent sales tax for school construction,
clarification on the teacher and state-supported
local bonuses, opposing the CSA private day special
education services rate cap, strengthening support
for the Students with Intensive Needs program,
support for additional staff positions in the Public
Defender's Office, enhanced competitive compensation
for state-supported local positions, protection
against unfunded burdens relative to SNAP food
assistance administration costs, and support for the
water infrastructure and regional water workgroup
that would address Richmond water issues. She
provided an update on the Department of Environmental
Quality's (DEQ) response to the Shoosmith Landfill.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided during the presentation.
F. Consent Agenda Highlights
5/27/2026 Page 4 of 95
Deputy County Administrator Jesse Smith provided
details of various agenda items on the evening's
consent agenda. Retiree A.J. Eavey was in the
audience, accompanied by members of his family, and
Board members congratulated him on his retirement.
G. Other Informational Highlights
Dr. Casey made the following announcements:
• Child Advocacy Center (CAC) Administrator
Jenelle Beverly, who was present in the audience
and accompanied by Juvenile Detention Home
Director Michelle Smith, recently received a
Women's Club of Chester 2026 Citizen Award;
• The county’s Fleet Services division within the
Department of General Services was recently
recognized by the National Association of Fleet
Administrators, earning the #96 spot in the 100
Best Fleets competition;
• Nineteen students from CCPS recently graduated
from the Emergency Telecommunicators Course,
which was the first class of its kind in the
state where high school seniors could learn the
daily operations of a 911 center and prepare for
a career in emergency communications; and
• Chesterfield is the recipient of three Virginia
Association of Counties (VACo) Achievement
Awards this year.
Dr. Miller provided details of the Bryant & Stratton
ribbon cutting, Arts in Action at Rockwood Park, and
celebration of Community Champions.
6. Reports
A. Reports on the Status of District Improvement
Operating and Capital Funds, General Fund Unassigned
Balance and Debt Policy Ratios, and Investments
The Board approved the Reports on the Status of
District Improvement Operating and Capital Funds,
General Fund Unassigned Balance and Debt Policy
Ratios, and Investments.
7. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
There were no speakers on unscheduled matters at this
time.
8. Closed Session
A. (1) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(1), Code of Virginia,
1950, as Amended, to Discuss Prospective Candidates
for Appointment to the Position of County
Administrator and (2) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(3),
Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss the
Acquisition by the County of Real Estate for a Public
Purpose, or the Disposition of Publicly Held Real
5/27/2026 Page 5 of 95
Property, Where Discussion in an Open Meeting Would
Adversely Affect the Bargaining Position and
Negotiating Strategy of the Public Body
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Hylton, the
Board went into Closed Session (1) Pursuant to § 2.2-
3711(A)(1), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to
Discuss Prospective Candidates for Appointment to the
Position of County Administrator and (2) Pursuant to
§ 2.2-3711(A)(3), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended,
to Discuss the Acquisition by the County of Real
Estate for a Public Purpose, or the Disposition of
Publicly Held Real Property, Where Discussion in an
Open Meeting Would Adversely Affect the Bargaining
Position and Negotiating Strategy of the Public Body.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
Reconvening:
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day
adjourned into Closed Session in accordance with a
formal vote of the Board and in accordance with the
provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information
Act; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act
effective July 1, 1989 provides for certification
that such Closed Session was conducted in conformity
with law.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Board of
Supervisors does hereby certify that to the best of
each member’s knowledge, i) only public business
matters lawfully exempted from open meeting
requirements under the Freedom of Information Act
were discussed in Closed Session to which this
certification applies, and ii) only such business
matters were identified in the motion by which the
Closed Session was convened were heard, discussed or
considered by the Board. No member dissents from this
certification.
Mr. Ingle: Aye.
Ms. Schneider: Aye.
Dr. Hylton: Aye.
Mr. Carroll: Aye.
Dr. Miller: Aye.
9. Recess for Dinner
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board recessed for dinner in Room 502.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
6 p.m. Evening Session - Public Meeting Room, 10001 Iron Bridge Road
5/27/2026 Page 6 of 95
Reconvening:
10. Invocation by the Honorable Mark S. Miller, Midlothian District Supervisor
The Honorable Mark S. Miller, Midlothian District
Supervisor, gave the invocation.
11. Pledge of Allegiance Led by Matt Harris, Deputy County Administrator
Deputy County Administrator Matt Harris led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
12. County Administration Update
A. Recognition of Older Americans Month and Older
Americans Month Storytelling Video Contest Winners
Aging and Disability Manager Kimberly Graves stated
the county celebrates Older Americans Month each May.
She further stated that as part of the celebration,
youth ages 8 to 12 submitted videos honoring a senior
who has made a meaningful impact in their lives. She
played the videos submitted by the top two winners,
Rilee Sites and Sushruth Papisetti. Both Rilee and
Sushruth were present for the recognition.
B. Youth Advisory Board Annual Presentation
Community Engagement Coordinator for Youth Services
Chloe Carter provided an overview of the work done by
the Youth Advisory Board during the 2025–2026 school
year.
The president of the Youth Advisory Board, Joseph
Njugi, 12th grade, Code RVA Regional High School, and
the secretary, Keira West, 11th grade, Midlothian
High School, provided details of the environmental
stewardship project, which focused on composting.
Ms. Carter then called the students forward to be
recognized and receive their certificates.
Board members expressed appreciation for the time and
energy the students put into serving on the board.
C. Other County Administration Updates
Deputy County Administrator Matt Harris announced
that the grand opening of The Park at River City
Sportsplex would be held on June 11, 2026, coinciding
with the International Day of Play.
13. Board Member Reports
Board members announced and provided details of
several community meetings and county-related events
they attended recently.
14. Resolutions and Special Recognitions
5/27/2026 Page 7 of 95
A. Recognition of George Hayes for General Assembly
Joint Commending Resolution
Delegate Mike Cherry and Senator Michael Jones'
Legislative Assistant, Kristin Paixao, presented
joint commending resolutions to former Director of
Utilities, George Hayes.
Also in attendance on behalf of Delegate Debra
Gardner was her Legislative Assistant, Tyler Tucker.
Board members highly praised Mr. Hayes for his
leadership, especially during the Richmond Water
Crisis.
Mr. Hayes expressed appreciation for the recognition.
He introduced his wife, Karen, and thanked her for
her support over the years.
B. Chesterfield County Recertification as a Crime
Prevention Community
Taylor Fisher with the Department of Criminal Justice
Services (DCJS) presented the Board with a Re-
Certification as a Crime Prevention Community.
Board members were proud to receive the
recertification, crediting the county's tremendous
public safety departments, and thanked the DCJS for
recognizing the county's efforts.
C. Recognition of James M. Holland Dale District
Scholarship Recipients
Laura Hite of the Chesterfield Education Foundation
(CEF) was present to introduce the two recipients of
the James M. Holland Dale District Scholarship,
Kendall Cherry from L.C. Bird High School and Sanai
Harris from Matoaca High School. Also present in the
audience to celebrate the students were Deputy
Superintendent of Schools Dr. Lisa High; L.C. Bird
High School's principal, Adrienne Blanton; and Mrs.
Judith Holland.
Miss Cherry announced she would be attending North
Carolina A. & T. State University to study Biology,
and Miss Harris announced she would be attending
James Madison University to major in Kinesiology and
minor in Sports Management.
D. Recognition of the Economic Development Department
Terri Cofer Beirne, Chair of the Economic Development
Authority (EDA), announced that three organizations
recently recognized the Department of Economic
Development. She stated that the department received
awards from the Greater Richmond Association for
Commercial Real Estate (GRACRE) for the new office
project, Springline and District 60 Phase I, and the
land sale transaction, Project Loch and Project Skye
Google transactions. She further stated the second
award was a Richmond Real Estate Group Impact Award
for the non-profit/public development, Springline at
District 60 Phase I. She announced that the
5/27/2026 Page 8 of 95
department received awards for top project
(Springline at District 60 Phase I) and top real
estate deal (Google land transactions) from Virginia
Business Magazine. Lastly, she announced that
Director of Economic Development Garrett Hart was
selected as one of Virginia Business Magazine's 2026
C-Suite Award honorees.
Mr. Hart expressed appreciation for the recognition
and thanked the EDA and the Economic Development
Department for the group effort.
Dr. Miller stated even though the county is
experiencing a time of transition with the retirement
of Dr. Casey and others in county leadership, the
county is in really good hands because of the hard
work done over many decades.
E. Recognition of 2025-2026 Future Community Leader
Certificate Recipients
Ms. Carter recognized the 2025-2026 Future Community
Leader Certificate recipients:
• Tiffany Chen, Midlothian District, 11th grade,
James River High School (absent)
• Hattie Hungate, Midlothian District, 11th grade,
James River High School
• Madison Jones, Midlothian District, 11th grade,
Midlothian High School
• Henock Nebiyo, Clover Hill, 11th grade, Clover
Hill High School
Board members expressed appreciation to the students
for dedicating their time and encouraged them to
return to Chesterfield for their permanent jobs.
F. Resolution Recognizing David W. "Rob" Robinson,
Chesterfield County Senior Deputy County Attorney,
Upon His Retirement
David W. "Rob" Robinson, accompanied by members of
his family, was present to receive the recognition.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Hylton, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, David (“Rob”) Robinson, Senior Deputy County
Attorney, will retire from the Office of the County
Attorney on July 1, 2026, after representing the
County of Chesterfield and a multitude of County
officials, employees, boards, and commissions with
distinction for over 27 years; and
WHEREAS, Rob joined the County Attorney’s Office in
1998 after a successful legal career in private
practice in a downtown law firm, specializing in the
area of construction litigation; and
WHEREAS, due to the needs of the office at that time,
Rob quickly transitioned to handling the substantive
areas of zoning and subdivision law, environmental
5/27/2026 Page 9 of 95
engineering, workers’ compensation, code
prosecutions, real property, and utilities; and
WHEREAS, in fairly short order, Rob became one of the
most knowledgeable and respected land use attorneys
in Virginia and became a mentor to other attorneys in
the County Attorney’s Office as well as a resource to
other local government attorneys throughout the
Commonwealth; and
WHEREAS, for almost three decades, Rob has been a
valuable, creative, and resourceful advocate for and
counsellor to the Planning Commission, the Board of
Zoning Appeals, the Historic Preservation Committee,
and innumerable members of the Planning Commission,
Board of Zoning Appeals, and Preservation Committee,
providing accurate, insightful, and practical legal
guidance. Members of these bodies have consistently
sought out Rob for advice and know that they can rely
on his advice with the utmost confidence; and
WHEREAS, Rob’s unwavering commitment to
professionalism and ethics, and his dedicated work
ethic as both an advisor and a litigator has earned
him promotions over his career to the positions of
Senior Assistant County Attorney, Deputy County
Attorney and his current position of Senior Deputy
County Attorney; and
WHEREAS, Rob has successfully litigated cases as
diverse as the Shoosmith quarry landfill case, scores
of workers’ compensation cases, the Dominion power
plant litigation, the Falling Creek dredging contract
litigation, and the Gateway (Baptist College) zoning
injunction litigation, to name just a few. He is
equally effective at the trial and appellate levels
and will not settle for anything other than an
excellent result for the County; and
WHEREAS, throughout his career Rob has taken on some
of the more sensitive issues which the County has had
to face, such as the regulation of massage parlors
and night clubs, and he is currently working on a
proposed ordinance to regulate vape shops; and
WHEREAS, Rob’s easy manner, his calm demeanor under
fire, and his excellent sense of humor make him
extremely approachable to his many clients and
disarmingly effective with his legal adversaries; and
WHEREAS, when not working for the County, Rob is a
dedicated and active member of his church, a rabid
fan of the Maryland Terps and the Arsenal soccer
team, a voracious reader, and a scholar of politics
and naval history (actually – all history); and
WHEREAS, and most importantly, Rob loves his family,
including his wife, children, and grandchildren, and
spends as much time with them as he can, whether at
the beach in Nags Head or elsewhere.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 27th day of May
5/27/2026 Page 10 of 95
2026, publicly recognizes the invaluable service of
Rob Robinson, expresses the appreciation of the Board
for his many contributions to the County, and extends
heartfelt congratulations to Rob upon his retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Rob, and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers
of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
County Attorney Jeff Mincks expressed appreciation to
Mr. Robinson for his many years of outstanding
service to the County Attorney's Office.
Deputy County Administrator Matt Harris presented Mr.
Robinson with a replica of the brick that will be
placed in the walkway in his honor.
Board members thanked Mr. Robinson for the many ways
he worked to protect the county and expressed their
hope that he would enjoy his retirement and spending
more time with his family.
Mr. Robinson expressed his deep thanks to the Board
for the resolution and kind words and introduced his
family members.
G. Recognition of 2026 Spring Government Citizens
Academy Graduates
Ms. Kelly Dale, Community Engagement Coordinator,
introduced recent graduates of the 2026 Spring
Government Citizens Academy, who were present to be
recognized and receive their certificates.
Pat Bockford, graduate of the academy class,
addressed the Board to give his perspective on what
he learned over the course of the academy.
15. New Business
A. Appointments
1. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Mr. Ingle,
the Board nominated/appointed Morgan Danner to
replace Daniel Larsen as a Clover Hill District
representative on the Parks and Recreation Advisory
Commission, whose term is effective immediately and
will expire December 31, 2027.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
B. Consent Items (15.B.1. - 15.B.9.g.)
5/27/2026 Page 11 of 95
1. Adoption of Resolutions
a. Resolution Recognizing A.J. Eavey III,
Treasurer's Office, Upon His Retirement
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. A.J. Eavey III will retire from
Chesterfield County on June 1, 2026, after providing
23 years of outstanding service to the citizens of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Eavey began as a Senior Customer Service
Representative in the Treasurer’s Office; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Eavey was part of many changes during
his career, including working for three different
Treasurers; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Eavey provided a high level of customer
service, developing relationships, showing continued
care and empathy, often going out of his way to meet
a need and consistently exceeding customer
expectations throughout his career where he on many
occasions received compliments from citizens for
going above and beyond to meet their needs; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Eavey has continuously demonstrated a
positive attitude, fantastic work ethic, honesty,
integrity, that will be missed by his co-workers and
our citizens; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Eavey has demonstrated his loyalty to
Chesterfield County through his dedication and
conscientiousness; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Mr. Eavey’s diligent service,
calm demeanor and unwavering commitment to customer
service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. A.J. Eavey
III and extends on behalf of its members and the
citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his
service to the county, congratulations upon his
retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
b. Resolution of Support for Safe Streets for
All Grant
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration's Safe
5/27/2026 Page 12 of 95
Streets for All (SS4A) grant program provides federal
funding to support planning, infrastructure,
behavioral and operational initiatives aimed at
preventing fatalities and service injuries on roads
and streets for all roadway users, including
pedestrians, bicyclists, public transportation
passengers, motorists and commercial vehicle
operators; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County adopted the goal of
reducing fatal and severe-injury crashes by 50
percent by the year 2035.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County hereby requests
SS4A funding to support projects and planning
activities that will help the county achieve its goal
of reducing fatal and serious-injury crashes by 50
percent by 2035.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board agrees to
provide a 20 percent local match to any federal funds
awarded through the SS4A program.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
2. Real Property Requests
a. Acceptance of Parcels of Land
1. Acceptance of a Parcel of Land
Adjacent to Branchway Road From
Inspiration House, Inc.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land
containing 0.04 acres adjacent to Branchway Road from
Inspiration House, Inc., and authorized the County
Administrator to execute the deed.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
2. Acceptance of a Parcel of Land
Adjacent to Genito Road From Waterford
Apartments, LLC
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land
containing 0.212 acres adjacent to Genito Road from
Waterford Apartments, LLC, and authorized the County
Administrator to execute the deed.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
3. Acceptance of Two Parcels of Land
Adjacent to Duval Road From Economic
Development Authority of the County of
Chesterfield
5/27/2026 Page 13 of 95
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board accepted the conveyance of two parcels of land
containing a total of 7.623 acres adjacent to Duval
Road from Economic Development Authority of the
County of Chesterfield, and authorized the County
Administrator to execute the deed.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
b. Conveyance of Easements
1. Designation of Right of Way for Bus
Loops Across Clover Hill Elementary
School, Harrowgate Elementary School,
J A Chalkley Elementary School, J G
Hening Elementary School, J B Watkins
Elementary School, Jacobs Road
Elementary School, Marguerite
Christian Elementary School, Moseley
Elementary School, Spring Run
Elementary School, Thelma Crenshaw
Elementary School and Woolridge
Elementary School for VDOT Maintenance
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board designated right of way for bus loops across
Clover Hill Elementary School, Harrowgate Elementary
School, J A Chalkley Elementary School, J G Hening
Elementary School, J B Watkins Elementary School,
Jacobs Road Elementary School, Marguerite Christian
Elementary School, Moseley Elementary School, Spring
Run Elementary School, Thelma Crenshaw Elementary
School and Woolridge Elementary School for VDOT
maintenance and authorize the County Administrator to
execute the designation.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
2. Designation of Parcels of Land for
Right of Way and a Temporary
Construction Easement for the Powhite
Over Tomahawk Creek Project
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board designated a total of 9.394 acres of land for
right of way and a temporary construction easement
for the Powhite Over Tomahawk Creek Project.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
c. Requests to Quitclaim
1. Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a
Water Easement Across the Property
Owned by Riverstone Properties, LLC
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
5/27/2026 Page 14 of 95
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a
quitclaim deed to quitclaim a portion of a water
easement across property owned by Riverstone
Properties, LLC.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
2. Request to Quitclaim Portions of Sewer
Easements, Portions of a SWM/BMP
Easement and a SWM/BMP Access Easement
Across the Properties Owned by 12801
Briggs Property Owner, LLC
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a
quitclaim deed to quitclaim portions of sewer
easements, portions of a SWM/BMP easement, and a
SWM/BMP access easement across the properties owned
by 12801 Briggs Property Owner, LLC.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
3. Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a
Drainage Easement Across the Property
Owned by Wal-Mart Real Estate Business
Trust
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a
quitclaim deed to quitclaim a portion of a drainage
easement across property owned by Wal-Mart Real
Estate Business Trust.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
4. Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a
SWMBMP Easement Across the Properties
Owned by Alcan Associates Limited
Partnership
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a
quitclaim deed to quitclaim a portion of a SWMBMP
easement across the properties owned by Alcan
Associates Limited Partnership.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
3. Acceptance of State Roads
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
5/27/2026 Page 15 of 95
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the streets described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Bethany Creek Park Section 2 Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Additions Reason for Change: New Streets
Street Name and/or Route Number
Pinchot Street State Route Number: 3199
From: Bethany Park Drive, (Route 8631)
To: 0.02 miles West of Mountain Pine Terrace (Route
3198), a distance of 0.15 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 317, Page 39
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
Bethany Park Drive State Route Number: 8631
From: 0.01 miles North of Bethany Creek Avenue
(Route 8630)
To: Pinchot Street, (Route 3199), a distance of 0.05
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 317, Page 39
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
Bethany Park Court State Route Number: 8676
From: Pinchot Street, (Route 3199)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.04 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 317, Page 39
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
And, further, the Board adopted the following
resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
5/27/2026 Page 16 of 95
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the streets described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Barrington at Magnolia Green Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Additions Reason for Change: New Streets
Street Name and/or Route Number
Barrin Drive State Route Number: 8671
From: Woolridge Road, (Route 7766)
To: Barrin Court (Route 8672), a distance of 0.14
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 318, Page 52
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Barrin Drive State Route Number: 8671
From: Barrin Court, (Route 8672)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.14 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 31, Page 52
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Barrin Court State Route Number: 8672
From: Barrin Drive, (Route 8671)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.14 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 318, Page 52
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
And, further, the Board adopted the following
resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the streets described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
5/27/2026 Page 17 of 95
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Legacy Park at Magnolia Green Section 2 Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Additions Reason for Change: New Streets
Street Name and/or Route Number
Cove Creek Drive State Route Number: 8363
From: Cove Creek Terrace, (Route 8674)
To: 0.03 miles West of Maple Summit Lane, (Route
8364), a distance of 0.12 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 302, Page 76
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Cove Creek Drive State Route Number: 8363
From: Cove Creek Terrace, (Route 8674)
To: Cove Creek Court, (Route 8673) a distance of 0.19
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 302, Page 76
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Cove Creek Drive State Route Number: 8363
From: Woolridge Road, (Route 7766)
To: Cove Creek Terrace, (Route 8674), a distance of
0.05 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 302, Page 76
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Cove Creek Drive State Route Number: 8363
From: Cove Creek Court, (Route 8673)
To: Cove Creek Terrace, (Route 8674), a distance of
0.05 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 302, Page 76
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Cove Creek Court State Route Number: 8673
From: Cove Creek Drive, (Route 8363)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.10 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 302, Page 76
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Cove Creek Terrace State Route Number: 8674
From: 0.05 miles South of Woolridge Road, (Route
7766)
5/27/2026 Page 18 of 95
To: 0.15 miles East of Maple Summit Lane, (Route
8364), a distance of 0.24 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 302, Page 76
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
4. Approval of FY2026 Budget Amendments
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved FY2026 Budget Amendments for both the
County and Schools as outlined in the agenda item.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
5. Approval of FY2027 Community Development Block
Grant and HOME Investment Partnerships Budget
Adjustments
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved recommended adjustments to the
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME
Investment Partnerships budget adjustments to align
with allocation amounts from the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
6. Authorization and Resolution of Support for
Federal Railroad Administration RCE and CRISI
Grants for Curtis Street and West Street Rail
Crossing Improvements
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board authorized staff to submit grant requests for
the Curtis Street and West Street Rail Crossing
Improvements Project Development.
And, further, the Board adopted the following
resolution:
WHEREAS, the Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and
Safety Improvements (CRISI) program’s purpose is to
improve rail assets, including grade crossing
improvements that enhance safety and efficiency; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation
has identified the Curtis Street crossing as the
second priority in the Commonwealth; and
WHEREAS, the Southeast High Speed Rail Tier III
Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Final
Decision calls for grade separating the crossing of
Curtis Street and closing the West Street crossing to
vehicular traffic, with a grade separated crossing
for pedestrians and bicyclists; and
WHEREAS, Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety
Improvements grant funds are available for project
development of crossing improvement projects.
5/27/2026 Page 19 of 95
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County requests CRISI
project development funding for the Curtis Street and
West Street Crossing Improvement project.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby
agrees to pay 20 percent of the total cost for
project development of the Curtis Street and West
Street Crossing Improvement project.
And, further, the Board adopted the following
resolution:
WHEREAS, the Railroad Crossing Elimination (RCE)
program’s purpose is to improve rail assets,
including grade crossing improvements that enhance
safety and efficiency; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation
has identified the Curtis Street crossing as the
second priority in the Commonwealth; and
WHEREAS, the Southeast High Speed Rail Tier III
Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Final
Decision calls for grade separating the crossing of
Curtis Street and closing the West Street crossing to
vehicular traffic, with a grade separated crossing
for pedestrians and bicyclists; and
WHEREAS, Railroad Crossing Elimination grant funds
are available for project development of crossing
improvement projects.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County requests RCE
project development funding for the Curtis Street and
West Street Crossing Improvement project.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby
agrees to pay 20 percent of the total cost for
project development of the Curtis Street and West
Street Crossing Improvement project.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
7. Authorization to Award a Construction Contract
for the River Road (Hickory Road to Brickhouse
Drive) Sidewalk Project
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board authorized the Director of Procurement to award
a construction contract to North Construction, Inc.
in the amount of $2,564,589 and to execute all
necessary change orders up to the full amount
budgeted for the River Road (Hickory Road to
Brickhouse Drive) Sidewalk project.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
8. Authorization to Execute Change Orders for the
Bailey Bridge Connector Advanced Utilities
Project
5/27/2026 Page 20 of 95
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board authorized the Procurement Director to execute
change orders up to the full budgeted amount for the
Bailey Bridge Connector Advanced Utilities project.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
9. Set Public Hearings for June 24, 2026
a. To Consider a Lease Amendment with T-Mobile
Northeast LLC
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board set June 24, 2026, as the date to hold a public
hearing to consider an amendment to the lease of
space on the county's Bon Air Tower with T-Mobile
Northeast LLC.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
b. To Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domain
for the Center Pointe Parkway Extension
Project
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board set June 24, 2026, as the date to hold a public
hearing to consider the exercise of eminent domain
for the acquisition of right-of-way and easements for
the Center Pointe Parkway Extension project.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
c. To Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domain
for the Western Area Infrastructure
Improvements Project
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board set June 24, 2026, as the date to hold a public
hearing to consider the exercise of eminent domain
for the acquisition of right-of-way and easements for
the Western Area Infrastructure Improvements project.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
d. To Consider Ordinance Amendments Relating
to Chapter 8 Stormwater Management and
Water Quality
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board set June 24, 2026, as the date to hold a public
hearing to consider fee amendments to County Code
Chapter 8 — Stormwater Management and Water Quality.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
e. To Consider an Amendment to County Code
Sections 9-29 Through 9-32 Relative to the
Rehabilitation Ordinance
5/27/2026 Page 21 of 95
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board set June 24, 2026, as the date to hold a public
hearing to consider an amendment to County Code
Sections 9-29 through 9-32 relative to the
Rehabilitation Ordinance.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
f. To Consider Dissolution of the
Centerpointe-Charter Colony Service
District
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board set June 24, 2026, as the date to consider the
dissolution of the Centerpointe-Charter Colony
Service District.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
g. To Consider the Creation of the Sawmill
Station Community Development Authority
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board set June 24, 2026, as the date to hold a public
hearing to consider the creation of the Sawmill
Station Community Development Authority.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
16. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
Katherine McMahon expressed concerns relative to data
centers.
Mary Finley-Brook expressed concerns relative to data
centers.
BeKura Shabazz expressed concerns relative to data
centers.
Ian Richards-Karamarkovich expressed concerns
relative to the county's contract with Flock Safety.
17. Deferred Items from Previous Meetings
There were no deferred items from previous meetings.
18. Zoning Requests
A. 23SN0124 - Taylor Ridge Rezoning and Exceptions -
Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Taylor Ridge
Rezoning and Exceptions is a request to rezone from
Agricultural (A) to Community Business (C-3) with
conditional use to permit townhouse and multifamily
uses plus conditional use planned development to
permit exceptions to ordinance requirements and
amendment of zoning district map fronting
5/27/2026 Page 22 of 95
approximately 1,360 feet on the north side of Hull
Street Road, 450 feet east of Doss Road. The 116.16
acre property is proposed for a maximum development
of 677 dwelling units. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Regional
Mixed Use. Tax IDs 701-668-1001 and 701-669-1141. If
approved, effective January 1, 2026, the zoning
classification shall be Corridor Commercial (CC).
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
Questions and discussion ensued between Mr. Carroll
and Principal Planner Rich Saunders regarding the
Comprehensive Plan, amount of units per acre, and
payment of full proffers by the developer.
Questions and discussion ensued between Mr. Carroll
and Mike Lang from the developer team regarding how
the development process works and how costs get
passed along to the consumer.
Questions and discussion ensued between Mr. Carroll
and Mr. Mincks relative to how tax revenue generated
by this development could be dedicated to the
transportation shed until Hull Street Road is
widened.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the
Board approved Case 23SN0124, subject to the
following conditions:
Proffered Conditions
The Owner-Applicant in this rezoning Case 23SN0124
pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia
(1950 as amended) and the Chesterfield County,
Virginia (“County”) Code of Ordinances, Chapter 19.1
Zoning Ordinance, for itself and its successor or
assigns, proffers that the development of the
approximately 116.16 acres with County Tax
Identification Numbers 701668100100000 (90.2 acres,
18400 Hull Street Road (Route 360)) and
701669114100000 (25.96 acres, 18200 Hull Street Road
(Route 360)) (collectively, the “Property”) under
consideration will be developed as set forth below;
however, in the event the request is denied or
approved with conditions not agreed to by the Owner-
Applicant, these proffers shall be immediately null
and void and of no further force or effect.
The Applicant hereby proffers the following
conditions, applicable to the Property:
1. Master Plan. The Textual Statement dated
December 2, 2025 shall be considered the Master Plan.
Development of the Property shall comply with the
5/27/2026 Page 23 of 95
County Code of Ordinances, Chapter 19.1 Zoning
Ordinance required conditions and development
standards except as outlined herein and in the Master
Plan. (P)
2. Exhibits. These proffers shall include the
following exhibits which by this reference are made a
part hereof:
a. Exhibit A— conceptual plan entitled,
“TAYLOR RIDGE CONCEPTUAL PLAN EXHIBIT A, MATOACA
DISTRICT, CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA”, prepared by Townes
Site Engineering, dated December 11, 2025
(“Conceptual Plan”).
b. Exhibit A2 – land bay conceptual plan
entitled, “TAYLOR RIDGE CONCEPTUAL PLAN EXHIBIT A2,
MATOACA DISTRICT, CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA”, prepared
by Townes Site Engineering, dated March 6, 2025
(“Land Bay Plan”).
c. Exhibit B – multifamily conceptual
renderings entitled, “TAYLOR RIDGE MULTIFAMILY
RENDERINGS” dated October 4, 2025 (the “Multifamily
Conceptual Renderings”).
d. Exhibit C – townhome conceptual
renderings entitled, “TAYLOR RIDGE TOWNHOME
RENDERINGS” dated October 16, 2024 (the “Townhome
Conceptual Renderings”).
e. Exhibit D – carriage homes conceptual
renderings entitled, “TAYLOR RIDGE CARRIAGE HOME
RENDERINGS” dated March 20, 2025 (the “Carriage Homes
Conceptual Renderings”).
f. Exhibit E – design standards entitled,
“TAYLOR RIDGE DESIGN STANDARDS, MIXED-USE COMMUNITY,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA”, prepared by The Crescent
Group, dated September 18, 2025 (the “Design
Standards”). (P)
3. Conceptual Plan. The Property shall be
developed in general conformance with the Conceptual
Plan. The Conceptual Plan is conceptual in nature
and may vary based on the final site plan depending
on the final soil studies, RPA lines, road and alley
design, lot locations, lot line locations, amenity
locations, building footprints, parking area design
and location, VDOT requirements, BMP design and
location, pedestrian way design and location, and
other design or engineering reasons. Any substantive
changes that do not relate to the prior sentence
shall be approved by the Planning Director at the
time of plans review. In the event of any conflict
between information shown on the Conceptual Plan and
these Proffered Conditions, these Proffered
Conditions shall control. (P)
4. Utilities. Public water and wastewater systems
shall be used. The existing thirty-inch (30")
waterline shall be extended, in the existing public
waterline easement, from the existing waterline
5/27/2026 Page 24 of 95
terminus at 17900 Hull Street Road (Route 360) across
the Property to the western boundary line of the
Property. (U)
5. Overall Water and Wastewater Plan.
a. The owner/developer/applicant
(“Developer”) shall submit to the Utilities
Department for review and approval a wastewater
system hydraulic analysis to verify downstream
capacity, prior to or in conjunction with the first
site or construction plan submittal. Any capacity
related improvements necessary to support the
wastewater demands of this development shall be the
responsibility of the Developer and shall be
reflected on the site or construction plan.
b. Prior to any tentative subdivision plan
or site plan approval, whichever occurs first, a
utility plan for the Property shall be submitted to
and approved by the Utilities Department (the
“Overall Water and Wastewater Plan”). Utilities for
this development, and phasing thereof, shall conform
to the approved utilities plan or as otherwise
approved by the Utilities Department.
c. Following the approval of an Overall
Water and Wastewater Plan, upon request of the
County, access to the Property and easements shall be
provided, at no cost on standard County documents, in
the location of improvements shown on the Overall
Water and Wastewater Plan, for the construction of
public water and/or wastewater lines independent of
the timing of this development. (U)
6. Transportation Density. For transportation
purposes, the maximum transportation density of this
development shall be 250 single-family attached
(townhome) dwelling units, 427 senior adult housing
(low-rise apartment) dwelling units, 50,000 square
feet of shopping plaza without supermarket and 5,000
square feet of fast-food restaurant with drive-
through, or equivalent density as approved/determined
by the Transportation Department. (T)
7. Residential Density. The maximum residential
dwelling units on the Property shall be 677 dwelling
units. Of those 677 dwelling units, a maximum of 527
units can be located on Land Bays 2 and 3 as depicted
on the Land Bay Plan (Exhibit A2). There shall be a
maximum of 250 non-age-restricted residential
dwelling units on the Property. The remaining units
shall be age-restricted; provided, however, any
dwelling units that are required to be age-restricted
shall be located on Land Bays 2 and 3 as depicted on
the Land Bay Plan (Exhibit A2). There shall be no
age-restricted requirement for any dwelling units
located on Land Bay 4, as depicted on the Land Bay
Plan (Exhibit A2). (P)
8. Age Restriction. Except as otherwise
prohibited by the Virginia Fair Housing Law, the
Federal Fair Housing Act, and such other applicable
federal, state or local legal requirements, the age-
5/27/2026 Page 25 of 95
restricted residential dwelling units shall be
restricted to “housing for older persons” as defined
in the Virginia Fair Housing Law and shall have no
person under 19 years of age permanently domiciled
therein. All plans and subdivision plats shall note
this restriction where it applies. (P)
9. Access. Direct vehicular access to/from the
Property to/from Hull Street Road (Route 360) shall
be limited to three (3) accesses, with the general
location and design shown/noted on the Conceptual
Plan (Exhibit A). Any modifications to the location
and/or design shall be approved by the Transportation
Department at time of plans review. (T)
10. Open Space, Amenity Areas, and Pedestrian
Areas.
a. The area shown as “Amenity Area A” on
the Conceptual Plan (Exhibit A) shall be provided for
the exclusive use by owners, residents, tenants,
guests, and invitees of the age-restricted townhomes
and 6-plex and condo flat residential units located
in Land Bays 2 and 3 as depicted on the Land Bay Plan
(Exhibit A2) and shall include at a minimum the
following: a minimum 3,000 square foot clubhouse with
fitness room, swimming pool, dog park, pickleball
courts, outdoor seating areas, decorative pedestrian-
style lighting, walking trails, bike racks and other
pedestrian-friendly or community amenity features
approved by the Planning Director at the time of
plans review.
b. The area shown as “Amenity Area B” on
the Conceptual Plan (Exhibit A) shall be provided for
the exclusive use by owners, residents, tenants,
guests, and invitees of the non-age-restricted
townhomes located in Land Bays 3 and 4 as depicted on
the Land Bay Plan (Exhibit A2) and shall include at a
minimum the following: a tot lot, outdoor seating
areas, decorative pedestrian-style lighting and
other pedestrian-friendly or community amenity
features approved by the Planning Director at the
time of plans review.
c. Common and recreation areas in the “Flex
Residential Area” shown on the Conceptual Plan
(Exhibit A) shall be provided for the exclusive use
by the residents, tenants, guests, and invitees of
the age-restricted multifamily apartment units and
carriage homes located on Land Bay 2, and shall
include at a minimum the following: a minimum 3,000
square foot enclosed clubhouse/recreation space,
swimming pool, dog park, outdoor seating areas,
decorative pedestrian-style lighting, bike racks and
other pedestrian-friendly or community amenity
features approved by the Planning Director at the
time of plans review. Common and recreation areas for
the exclusive use by residents, tenants, guests, and
invitees of the age-restricted multifamily 6-plex
units and condo flats, and townhome units located on
Land Bay 2 shall include at a minimum the following:
outdoor seating areas, decorative pedestrian-style
5/27/2026 Page 26 of 95
lighting and other pedestrian-friendly or community
amenity features approved by the Planning Director at
the time of plans review. A minimum of 1.5 acres of
recreational area shall be provided in Land Bay 2.
d. In addition to the foregoing, any
sharing of amenities between any age-restricted
apartments and carriage homes in Land Bay 2 as
depicted on the Land Bay Plan (Exhibit A2) and all
other age-restricted units on Land Bays 2 and 3 as
depicted on the Land Bay Plan (Exhibit A2) shall only
be permitted upon written agreement of the owners or
declarants of the age-restricted apartment units in
Land Bay 2 as depicted on the Land Bay Plan (Exhibit
A2) and the owners or declarants of all other age-
restricted units in Land Bays 2 and 3 as depicted on
the Land Bay Plan (Exhibit A2). All pedestrian
trails located throughout the Property and amenity
areas not specified herein shall be available for use
by all owners, residents, guests and invitees of all
units on the Property. A path or trail within any
Resource Protection Area must be approved by the
Department of Environmental Engineering at the time
of plans review. (P)
11. Overall Design Standards:
a. Driveways. All private driveways
serving townhouse residential uses shall be brushed
concrete, stamped concrete, or bituminous concrete or
similar material. Gravel driveways shall not be
permitted.
b. Front walks. A minimum of three foot
(3’) wide concrete, or decorative pavers, front walk
shall be provided to the front entrance of each
dwelling unit, to connect to drives, sidewalks, or
streets.
c. Foundation Planting. Foundation
plantings shall be required along the entire front
façade of all residential dwelling units and shall
extend along all sides of such units facing a street.
Foundation planting beds shall be a minimum of four
feet (4’) wide measured from the dwelling unit
foundation. Planting beds shall be defined with a
trenched edge or suitable landscape edging material
and shall include medium shrubs spaced a maximum of
four feet (4’) apart and may include spreading
groundcovers. The plant materials used should
visually soften the unit corners and complement the
architecture of the home at their mature sizes and
shall include native species and/or drought-resistant
plants when located in non-irrigated beds in order to
minimize the need for irrigation. Planting bed
deviations may be approved by the Planning Department
at the time of plans review due to unique design
circumstances.
d. Garage Doors. Any front-loaded garage
door shall use an upgraded garage door with a minimum
of two (2) enhanced features. Enhanced features shall
include windows, raised panels, decorative panels,
5/27/2026 Page 27 of 95
arches, ornamental hardware or other architectural
features on the exterior that enhance the entry (i.e.
decorative lintels, shed roof overhangs arches,
columns, keystones, eyebrows, etc.). Flat panel
garage doors shall be prohibited.
e. Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning
(HVAC) Units and Generators. Units shall initially
be screened from view of roads by landscaping or low
maintenance material, as approved by the Planning
Department.
f. Direct Vent Fireplace. Direct vent gas
fireplace boxes, which protrude beyond the exterior
face of the townhome dwelling unit, are not permitted
on front façades. All the exterior materials and
finishes used to enclose the fireplace box must match
the adjacent façade.
g. Street Lighting. Street lights will be
provided at all intersections of the internal roads,
or as required by the County Code of Ordinances,
Chapter 19.1 Zoning Ordinance, and lighting shall be
non-glare, decorative in style, and residential in
character.
h. Pedestrian Connections. Pedestrian
connections shall be provided between Land Bays 1 and
2, and a pedestrian connection on the northern
boundary line of the Property shall be provided to
facilitate pedestrian movement between the Property
and the internal park trails of the future Magnolia
Green Park (7270 Magnolia Green Parkway).
i. Additional Parking. A minimum of one
hundred (100) parking spaces shall be provided on-
street or off-street or combined to serve guests of
residents in the development. These spaces are in
addition to the County Code of Ordinances, Chapter
19.1 Zoning Ordinance requirement for 2.2 parking
spaces per townhome unit. In addition, guest parking
shall also be permitted in Amenity Area A, with a
minimum of twenty (20) additional parking
spaces. For purposes of calculating parking spaces
at the time of plans review, the County Code of
Ordinances, Chapter 19.1 Zoning Ordinance
requirements for parking shall apply, and tandem
parking on a single townhouse lot shall equal 2
parking spaces (garage plus single driveway = 2
spaces). (P)
12. Townhome and 6-plex Design Standards:
a. Elevations. Unless significant
deviations are approved by the Planning Director
during plans review, the architectural treatment of
the townhome and 6-plex dwelling units shall be
consistent (incorporating similar, but not
necessarily identical design elements, style and
materials) with the elevations shown in the
Multifamily Conceptual Renderings (Exhibit B) and the
Townhome Conceptual Renderings (Exhibit C), as
applicable.
5/27/2026 Page 28 of 95
b. High Visibility Side Elevations: The
Conceptual Plan (Exhibit A) identifies certain
dwelling unit side elevations that are required to
have a high visibility side elevation. A high
visibility side elevation shall employ design
features to embellish the side façade. The design
features employed shall include at least two (2) of
the following design elements: two different siding
styles, gables, dormers, shutters, windows and other
architectural features used on the front elevation or
the use of enhanced landscaping to reinforce the
streetscape and minimize the view of the side of the
units with shade trees, fences, hedges, shrubs, or
other acceptable landscape feature to help define the
side yard and street edge.
c. Materials. Acceptable siding materials
include stone, brick, brick veneer, masonry, fiber
cement siding (such as HardiPlank, HardieShingle, and
HardiTrim), engineered wood siding (such as LP
SmartSide), or high-grade vinyl (a minimum of .044”
nominal thickness as evidenced by the manufacturer’s
printed literature), or another masonry architectural
element approved by the Planning Director, or another
material approved by the Planning Director. Dutch
lap, plywood and metal siding are not permitted.
Other materials may be used for parapets, cornices,
surrounds, trim, architectural decorations, and
design elements.
d. Variation in Front Elevations. Townhome
units within the same building with the exact same
front elevation may not be attached to each
other. Variation in the front elevation may not be
achieved by simply mirroring the façade, but may be
accomplished by providing at least three (3) of the
following architectural changes:
i. Adding masonry or stone on the
front façade elevation of the first floor.
ii. Varying the location of roof
type, roof line, front facing gable(s) and/or
dormers.
iii. Varying the style of roof type,
roof line, front facing gable(s) and/or dormers.
iv. Providing varied siding
application using horizontal siding, shake siding,
and/or board and batten siding.
v. Providing varied color
application.
vi. Adding or removing a porch.
vii. Adding or removing a covered
stoop.
viii. Adding projections such as bay
windows, second floor balconies, and accent roofs.
ix. Changing the width of the unit.
x. Adding a third enhanced feature
to a garage door.
xi. Any other element of
architectural variation as approved by the Director
of Planning.
5/27/2026 Page 29 of 95
In addition, this variation obligation
may be achieved on a building-by-building basis if
approved by the Director of Planning at the time of
plans review and approval.
e. Roofing. Roofing material shall be
material consisting of, but not limited to,
architectural dimensional shingles, metal, or rubber
membrane, and having a minimum 30-year warranty.
f. Front Porches and Stoops. Every
townhome unit shall have either a covered front
porch, a covered or recessed front stoop, or a
recessed courtyard entry. All stoop, porch or
courtyard floors shall be concrete or exposed
aggregate concrete, or a finished paving material
such as stone, tile, or brick, or properly trimmed
composite decking boards. All front steps shall be
concrete. Wood steps, stoops, or porches will not be
permitted on the front elevation.
g. Unit Lighting. A post light will be
placed in the front yard, or a carriage light will be
placed over the garage.
h. Foundation Treatment. There shall be a
minimum vertical height of eighteen (18) inches of
brick, brick veneer, stone, stone veneer, or other
masonry material approved by the Planning Director
installed above grade for units with slab-on-grade
foundations on all front, side, and rear
elevations. All other foundations shall be faced
entirely of brick, brick veneer, stone, stone veneer,
cultured stone, and/or other masonry materials. (P)
13. Multifamily Design Standards:
a. Elevations. Unless significant
deviations are approved by the Planning Director
during plans review, the architectural treatment of
any multifamily apartment or condo flat building or
carriage home shall be consistent (incorporating
similar, but not necessarily identical design
elements, style and materials) with the elevations
shown in the Multifamily Conceptual Renderings
(Exhibit B) and the Carriage Homes Conceptual
Renderings (Exhibit D), as applicable.
b. Materials. Acceptable siding materials
include stone, brick, brick veneer, masonry, fiber
cement siding (such as HardiPlank, HardieShingle, and
HardiTrim), engineered wood siding (such as LP
SmartSide), or high-grade vinyl (a minimum of .044”
nominal thickness as evidenced by the manufacturer’s
printed literature), or another masonry architectural
element approved by the Planning Director, or another
material approved by the Planning Director. Dutch
lap, plywood and metal siding are not
permitted. Other materials may be used for parapets,
cornices, surrounds, trim, architectural decorations,
and design elements.
c. Roofing. Roofing material for a sloped
5/27/2026 Page 30 of 95
roof shall be standing seam metal or dimensional
architectural shingles with a minimum of 30-year
warranty, unless a different material satisfying the
same minimum warranty is approved by the Planning
Director at the time of plans review.
d. Three Bedroom. The total number of any
three (3) bedroom units shall not exceed fifteen
percent (15%) of the total number of units.
e. Building Orientation and Parking/Drives.
Multifamily apartment and condo flat residential
buildings shall front public roads, and parking and
drive aisles shall be located to the sides/rear of
multifamily apartment and condo flat residential
buildings. (STAFF NOTE: for Commercial Building
Orientation in Land Bay 2, see Proffered Condition
23)
f. Foundation Treatment. There shall be a
minimum vertical height of eighteen (18) inches of
brick, brick veneer, stone, stone veneer, or other
masonry material approved by the Planning Director
installed above grade for units with slab-on-grade
foundations on all front, side, and rear
elevations. All other foundations shall be faced
entirely of brick, brick veneer, stone, stone veneer,
cultured stone, and/or other masonry materials. (P)
14. Internal Public Roads/ Street Standards.
a. Road Width. The internal roads within
the Townhome area (Land Bays 2, 3 and 4) shall have a
minimum width of thirty-two feet (32’) from face-of-
curb to face-of-curb.
b. Sidewalks. VDOT standard sidewalks
shall generally be provided on both sides of public
roads in public right-of-way for state acceptance,
unless otherwise approved by the Planning and
Transportation Department at the time of plans
review.
c. Pedestrian Connectivity. Pedestrian
connectivity in the form of sidewalks and/or trails
shall be provided between all land bays as well as to
adjoining properties where existing or future
development is planned as approved by the Planning
Department at the time of plans review. (T & P)
15. Right of Way Dedication. Prior to any site
plan approval, in conjunction with the recordation of
the initial subdivision plat, or within sixty (60)
days of a written request by the Transportation
Department, whichever occurs first, the following
rights-of-way shall be dedicated, free and
unrestricted, to and for the benefit of the County
and/or VDOT:
a. One hundred feet (100’) of right-of-way
along the north side of Hull Street Road (Route 360)
measured from the centerline of that part of the road
immediately adjacent to the Property;
5/27/2026 Page 31 of 95
b. Minimum of seventy feet (70’) of right-
of-way for the East/West Collector Road (“Magnolia
Market Parkway”) from the eastern to the western
Property lines; and
c. Minimum of seventy feet (70’) of right-
of-way for the North/South Collector Road (“Entrance
Road”) from Hull Street Road (Route 360) to Magnolia
Market Parkway intersection.
If requested by the Developer and accepted by the
Transportation Department, the right-of-way
dedications noted above may be phased in accordance
with an approved phasing plan. Prior to any
development plan approval, a phasing plan for the
proffered right-of-way dedications noted shall be
submitted to and approved by the Transportation
Department. (T)
16. Transportation Improvements. To provide for
an adequate road network at time of development, the
following transportation improvements shall be
completed by the Developer, with the exact design and
length of improvements approved by the Transportation
Department. If any of the transportation improvements
identified below are provided by others, as
determined by the Transportation Department, then the
specific road improvement shall no longer be
required.
a. Construction of a three (3) lane section
for the Entrance Road with pedestrian accommodations
to VDOT Urban Collector standards with a 30-mph
design speed from Hull Street Road (Route 360)
intersection to the Magnolia Market Parkway
intersection, with any modifications as approved by
the Transportation Department;
b. Construction of a three (3) lane section
for Magnolia Market Parkway with pedestrian
accommodations to VDOT Urban Collector standards with
a 30-mph design speed from the western Property line
to the eastern Property line as shown on the
Conceptual Plan (Exhibit A), with any modifications
as approved by the Transportation Department.
Improvement shall connect to off-site Magnolia Market
Parkway as noted in Proffered Condition 18.a;
c. Construction of additional pavement to
provide left and right turn lanes along Magnolia
Market Parkway at each approved public road
intersection, unless alternative intersection design
is provided to adequately address turning movements
as approved by the Transportation Department. Example
of alternative intersection would be
roundabout/traffic circle or partial vehicular
access;
d. Construction of additional pavement to
provide left and right turn lanes along the Entrance
Road at each approved vehicular access, unless
alternative intersection design is provided to
5/27/2026 Page 32 of 95
adequately address turning movements as approved by
the Transportation Department. Example of alternative
intersection would be roundabout/traffic circle or
partial vehicular access;
e. Off-Site: Construct an additional lane
of pavement on Hull Street Road (Route 360) along the
Property frontage for a future third westbound
through lane;
f. Construction of VDOT standard sidewalk
along the Property’s frontage to Hull Street Road
(Route 360);
g. If partial crossover/median break along
Hull Street Road (Route 360) is approved by VDOT,
then construct a directional crossover and adequate
left turn lanes in both directions at the Hull Street
Road (Route 360)/Entrance Road access with any
modifications approved by the Transportation
Department at time of plans review;
h. Construct additional pavement along the
westbound lanes of Hull Street Road (Route 360) at
each approved access to provide a separate right turn
lane. Improvement shall be completed in conjunction
with each approved Hull Street Road (Route 360)
access;
i. Off-Site: Construction of additional
pavement along the westbound lanes of Hull Street
Road (Route 360) to provide an adequate left turn
lane at the next available crossover west of the
proposed Hull Street Road (Route 360)/Entrance Road
partial crossover as determined by the Transportation
Department and VDOT;
j. Off-Site: Closure of the existing
crossover/median break located between the Hull
Street Road (Route 360)/Entrance Road proposed
partial crossover/median break access and the
existing Hull Street Road (Route 360)/Doss Road
crossover/median break, unless otherwise approved by
the Transportation Department and VDOT; and
k. Dedication to Chesterfield County, free
and unrestricted, of any additional right-of-way (or
easements) required for the improvements identified
above. (T)
17. Transportation Improvement Phasing. As
determined by the Transportation Department, a
phasing plan for the proffered transportation
improvements, as identified in Proffered Condition
16, shall be submitted to and approved by the
Transportation Department at the time of plans
review. The phasing plan shall include the following,
unless otherwise requested by the Developer and
approved by the Transportation Department:
a. In conjunction with any direct
vehicular access to Hull Street Road (Route 360), the
Developer shall construct the improvements specified
5/27/2026 Page 33 of 95
in Proffered Conditions 16.b (Magnolia Market
Parkway), 16.e (additional lane of pavement along
Hull Street Road (Route 360) for future third
westbound through lane), 16.f (VDOT standard sidewalk
along Hull Street Road (Route 360)), 16.h (additional
pavement along westbound lanes of Hull Street Road
(Route 360) for a separate right turn lane at each
approved access), 16.i (left turn lane at the next
available crossover west of the proposed Hull Street
Road (Route 360)/Entrance Road partial crossover),
and 16.k (any dedication of any additional right-of-
way or easements required for the improvements);
b. In conjunction with development that
provides the Entrance Road, the Developer shall
construct the improvements specified in Proffered
Conditions 16.a (Entrance Road), 16.g (directional
crossover with left turn lanes in both directions, if
approved by VDOT), 16.j (close existing crossover
along Hull Street Road (Route 360) west of the
Entrance Road access, if approved by VDOT), 16.i
(left turn lane at the next available crossover west
of the proposed Hull Street Road (Route 360)/Entrance
Road partial crossover), and 16.k (any dedication of
any additional right-of-way or easements required for
the improvements); and
c. In conjunction with development
providing vehicular access to Magnolia Market Parkway
and/or the Entrance Road, the Developer shall
construct turn lanes or alternative intersection
design per Proffered Conditions 16.c. (additional
pavement to provide left and right turn lanes along
Magnolia Market Parkway at each approved public road
intersection) and 16.d. (additional pavement to
provide left and right turn lanes along the Entrance
Road at each approved vehicular access). (T)
18. Development Phasing – Transportation. To
ensure an adequate road network to accommodate
development of the Property, one (1) of the following
off-site transportation improvements not included in
Developer’s proffered transportation improvements
(Proffered Condition 16) of this request, shall be
completed as determined by the Transportation
Department, prior to the issuance of building permits
that would permit more than one hundred (100)
residential dwelling units or issuance of a
certificate of occupancy for any commercial
development on the Property:
a. Off-Site Transportation Improvement:
Connection to the East
i. Construction of Magnolia
Market Parkway from Magnolia Market Avenue to the
Property’s eastern Property line, approximately 700
feet;
ii. Construction of Magnolia
Market Avenue Phase 2 (now or formerly Site Plan Case
16PR0145 titled “Magnolia Green – Magnolia Market
Avenue – Phase 2”) from the existing terminus of
5/27/2026 Page 34 of 95
Magnolia Market Avenue Phase 1 to Hull Street Road
(Route 360), approximately 1,600 feet;
iii. Construction of additional
pavement along southbound lanes of Magnolia Market
Avenue to provide for a three-lane typical section at
the Hull Street Road (Route 360) intersection; and
iv. Construction of intersection
control (traffic signal or alternative/innovative
intersection design) at the Hull Street Road (Route
360)/Magnolia Market Avenue intersection.
Installation of a stop sign at the Magnolia Market
Avenue/Hull Street Road (Route 360) intersection is
not considered “intersection control” for the
purposes of meeting this proffered condition.
OR:
b. Off-Site Transportation Improvement:
Connection to the West
i. Construction of adequate road
network to provide a Future East/West Collector Road
(“Magnolia Market Parkway Extension West”) and a
Future North/South Collector Road to Hull Street Road
(Route 360), as determined by the Transportation
Department. Improvements required for these roads
will be specified with adjacent zoning case (now or
formerly Case 24SN1353 Sawmill Station); and
ii. Construction of intersection
control (traffic signal or alternative/innovative
intersection design) at the Hull Street Road (Route
360)/Future North/South Collector Road intersection.
Installation of a stop sign at the Future North/South
Collector Road /Hull Street Road (Route 360)
intersection is not considered “intersection control”
for the purposes of meeting this proffered condition.
(T)
19. Commercial Phasing. Developer is required to
commence construction of a minimum of 20,000 square
feet of commercial development on the Property upon
completion of the following: (1) 85% of the
residential dwelling units permitted on the Property
have received a final certificate of occupancy, and
(2) 85,000 square feet of commercial development has
been constructed and issued a certificate of
occupancy in either (i) Magnolia Green alone, or (ii)
a combination of Magnolia Green and the planned
Sawmill Station development (County GPINs 698-666-
8859, 700-666-2325, 699-666-2969, 698-666-3718, 699-
668-8633, 700-667-1418, and 699-667-5963; County
Rezoning Case 24SN1353). (P)
20. Environmental Engineering.
a. Super Silt Fence, or an alternative as
approved by the Department of Environmental
Engineering, shall be provided as a perimeter control
in locations where standard silt fence would have
been required.
5/27/2026 Page 35 of 95
b. Sediment traps and basins sized at
least 25% larger than the minimum Virginia Stormwater
Management Handbook’s standard shall be provided,
unless otherwise approved by the Department of
Environmental Engineering at the time of plan review.
c. Anionic polyacrylamide “PAM”(a non-
toxic synthetic polymer used to control soil erosion
and sedimentation), Flexible Growth Medium (erosion
control product that forms a flexible, porous blanket
on soil surfaces to prevent erosion and promote rapid
plant growth), and/or a County-approved equivalent
shall be applied to denuded areas (areas that have
been cleared of vegetative cover) during construction
and at final stabilization in the locations shown on
plans approved by the Department of Environmental
Engineering at the time of plan review.
d. The maximum post-development discharge
rate for the 100-year storm shall be based on the
maximum capacity of the existing facilities
downstream, and shall not increase the recorded
and/or established 100-year backwater and/or
floodplain. On-site detention of the post-development
100-year discharge rate to below the pre-development
100-year discharge rate shall be provided to satisfy
this requirement. (EE)
21. Security.
a. Multifamily
i. Common building entrances shall
utilize an electronic access control system such as
key fob or smartphone readers. Emergency police/fire
access electronic pushbutton keypads shall be
installed at a minimum of two common building
entrances. Prior to the certificate of occupancy
being issued, Developer shall contact the
Chesterfield County Emergency Communications Center
(ECC) Operations Manager to establish a unique, four
digit, police/fire-only access code.
ii. Exterior video surveillance
cameras shall be integrated with Chesterfield County
Police Department’s Analytic and Strategic Operations
Center (ASOC) to assist with investigations and
criminal apprehensions.
iii. Full cut-off, photocell-
activated, minimum 70 CRI-rated LED luminaires shall
illuminate apartment sidewalks, parking, and trash
enclosures with a minimum maintained illumination
level of 1.0 foot-candle, as measured at grade.
iv. Foundation plantings within
ten feet (10’) of common apartment building entrances
and exits shall not have natural, mature growth
habits that exceed three feet (3’) in height.
v. Prior to the certificate of
occupancy being issued, Developer shall provide a
labeled PDF copy of the apartment building’s floor
plans to the Chesterfield County Emergency
5/27/2026 Page 36 of 95
Communications Center (ECC) Operations Manager.
b. Townhomes and Single Family Dwellings.
Subject to VDOT approval, pole-mounted, full cut-off,
photocell-activated, minimum 70 CRI-rated LED
luminaires shall illuminate areas within fifteen feet
(15’) of cluster mailbox units (CBU) with a minimum
maintained illumination level of 0.7 foot-candles, as
measured at grade.
c. Residential Amenity Parking
Areas. Subject to VDOT approval, pole-mounted, full
cut-off, photocell-activated, minimum 70 CRI-rated
LED luminaires shall illuminate sidewalks and parking
with a minimum maintained illumination level of 1.0
foot-candles, as measured at grade.
d. Commercial Area.
i. Subject to VDOT approval, pole-
mounted, full cut-off, photocell-activated, minimum
70 CRI-rated LED luminaires shall illuminate
sidewalks, parking, and dumpster enclosures with a
minimum maintained illumination level of 1.0 foot-
candles, as measured at grade.
ii. Parking lot light poles shall
not be located within fifteen feet (15’) of shade
trees. (Police)
22. Western Route 360 Design Standards. The
Developer shall ensure a cohesive design aesthetic
with commercial and residential developments in the
County’s western Hull Street Road (Route 360)
corridor, with development of the Property to be in
general conformance with the design aesthetic shown
in the Design Standards attached hereto as Exhibit
E. At the time of plans review, the Developer shall
submit comprehensive design guidelines which shall
provide for the creation of improvements on the
Property to be arranged, designed and landscaped to
evoke a sense of “place” by organizing pedestrian and
vehicular circulation (and parking) in a manner that
respects the residential areas of the Property while
meeting the needs of merchants and customers for
convenience; incorporating an overall design theme in
general conformance with the design aesthetic shown
in the Design Standards attached hereto as Exhibit E
to provide continuity, identity, and cohesiveness
including street lights, street trees, commercial
monument signage, paving materials, walking trails,
landscape design and materials, nonresidential
building design and materials, and other site
features such as benches and other outdoor seating
and gathering areas, fencing, etc. as may be
appropriate for the development and design theme. (P)
23. Commercial Building Orientation in Land Bay 2.
If commercial/office/retail use is developed in Land
Bay 2 and it’s located along Magnolia Market Parkway,
the commercial/office/retail buildings shall front
Magnolia Market Parkway, and parking and drive aisles
shall be located to the sides/rear of the
commercial/office/retail buildings. (P)
5/27/2026 Page 37 of 95
24. Road Cash Proffer. Developer shall pay to the
County $2,914 for each age-restricted dwelling unit
constructed on the Property and $5,922 for each non-
age-restricted dwelling unit constructed on the
Property, for road improvements within the service
district for the Property (“Road Cash Proffer”). Each
payment shall be made prior to the issuance of a
final certificate of occupancy for such dwelling unit
unless state law modifies the timing of the payment.
Should the County impose impact fees at any time
during the life of the development that are
applicable to the Property, the amount paid in Road
Cash Proffers shall be in lieu of or credited toward,
but not be in addition to, any impact fees, in a
manner determined by the County. The Road Cash
Proffer payment is required in addition to the
Developer’s obligation to construct the
transportation improvements identified in the
‘Transportation Improvements’ proffered condition
above, and shall not be construed to offset or
satisfy that obligation. (Budget)
25. Development Phasing – Residential.
a. There shall be no building permits
issued for any residential dwelling units on the
Property prior to January 1, 2027.
b. There shall be no more than 100
residential dwelling units issued building permits on
the Property prior to January 1, 2028.
c. There shall be no more than a
cumulative total of 200 residential dwelling units
issued building permits on the Property prior to
January 1, 2029.
d. There shall be no more than a
cumulative total of 300 residential dwelling units
issued building permits on the Property prior to
January 1, 2030.
e. There shall be no more than a
cumulative total of 400 residential dwelling units
issued building permits on the Property prior to
January 1, 2031.
f. There shall be no more than a
cumulative total of 500 residential dwelling units
issued building permits on the Property prior to
January 1, 2032.
g. There shall be no more than a
cumulative total of 600 residential dwelling units
issued building permits on the Property prior to
January 1, 2033.
h. There shall be no more than a
cumulative total of 677 residential dwelling units
issued building permits on the Property prior to
January 1, 2034. (P & BI)
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
B. 24SN1306 - Phillips Landing Rezoning - Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Phillips Landing
Rezoning is a request to rezone from Agricultural (A)
to Rural Community (RC) and amendment of zoning
5/27/2026 Page 38 of 95
district map fronting approximately 1,350 feet on the
south side of River Road, 975 feet west of Riverway
Road, as well as fronting approximately 10 feet on
the west side of Second Branch Road, 5,200 feet south
of River Road, known as 13611 River Road. The 336.5
acre property is proposed for a maximum development
of 50 dwelling units. The Comprehensive Plan suggests
the property is appropriate for Rural
Residential/Agricultural use (0.2 units per acre or
less). Tax IDs 727-637-0339; 727-639-1399 and 728-
642-2496.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
William Shewmake, representing adjacent landowners,
emphasized the importance of building the connections
to the property line for the orderly development of
the area.
Jerry Turner expressed concerns relative to the Board
letting developers continue to build, resulting in
the worsening of roads and schools.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
Mr. Carroll stated this is the first case of its kind
in the county to look at reducing density and
preserving green space. He further stated that if a
zoning case meets the Comprehensive Plan, and there
is not a public safety issue, the Board cannot
legally deny the case due to insufficient
infrastructure. He stated that even if he wanted to,
he did not have a legal justification to deny this
case. He then made a motion, seconded by Ms.
Schneider, for the Board to approve Case 24SN1306,
subject to the following conditions:
Proffered Conditions
The property owner and applicant in this zoning case
24SN1306 (“Applicant”), pursuant to Section 15.2-2298
of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended) and the
Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for
themselves, and their successors or assigns, proffer
that the property under consideration identified as
parcels 727639139900000, 728642249600000, and
727637033900000, consisting of a total of 336.5 acres
(collectively, the “Property”) will be developed
according to the following proffers if, and only if,
the rezoning request submitted herewith is granted
with only those conditions agreed to by the
Applicant. In the event this request is denied or
approved with conditions not agreed to by the
Applicant, the proffers shall immediately be null and
void of no further force or effect.
1. Conceptual Layout. The site shall be developed
in general conformance with the conceptual layout
5/27/2026 Page 39 of 95
depicted as Exhibit A attached hereto entitled
“Phillips Landing Rezoning” prepared by The Bay
Companies, and dated November 4, 2024, last revised
February 2, 2026 (the “Concept Plan”). The Concept
Plan is conceptual in nature, and the final
subdivision plat may vary based on field studies to
include location of wetlands, soil conditions, final
road design, and other engineering and design
considerations. (P)
2. Residential Density. Residential density for
the Property shall be limited to a maximum of fifty
(50) single family homes. (P)
3. Minimum Floor Area.
a. The minimum area for any one-story
dwelling shall be 1,850 square feet.
b. The minimum floor area for any one-and-
a-half-story dwelling shall be 1,900 square feet.
c. The minimum floor area for any two-story
dwelling shall be 2,400 square feet. (P & BI)
4. Exterior Materials.
a. There shall be a minimum vertical height
of eighteen (18) inches of brick, brick veneer, stone
or stone veneer above grade utilized on slab-on-grade
foundations on all elevations. All other foundations
shall be faced entirely of brick, brick veneer,
stone, stone veneer, cultured stone, and/or other
masonry materials.
b. Acceptable siding materials shall
consist of brick, stone, masonry, fiber cement siding
(such as HardiPlank, HardiShingle, HardiTrim or
equivalent), engineered wood siding, or premium vinyl
siding with a minimum 0.44” nominal thickness. Dutch
lap, metal, or plywood siding shall not be permitted.
c. Elements of exterior facades (cladding,
trim, and doors) shall have a minimum of three
colors, except a minimum of two colors shall be
included if the cladding is white. (P)
5. Architecture. The conceptual elevations shown
in Exhibit B show the quality and different forms
that could be used for detached single family
dwellings on the Property. Architectural styles for
dwellings shall be interpretations of traditional and
modern Richmond architecture, using forms and
elements compatible (but not limited to) Georgian,
Classical Revival, Colonial, Greek Revival, Queen
Anne, and Craftsman Styles, with a design quality
comparable to the Rountrey subdivision. (P)
6. Elevation Repetition. The same dwelling unit
elevations shall not be located adjacent to or
directly across from each other along the same road.
This requirement does not apply to units on different
streets backing up to each other. Variation in the
5/27/2026 Page 40 of 95
front elevation shall not be achieved by simply
mirroring the fade but may be accomplished by two (2)
of the following:
a. Adding or removing a porch or covered
entry or increasing or decreasing the length of the
porch or entry;
b. Adding masonry on the front facade
elevation of the first floor;
c. Varying the location and/or style of
roof type, roof line, front facing gable(s) and/or
dormers;
d. Providing varied siding application
using horizontal siding, shake siding, and/or board
and batten siding;
e. Adding projections such as bay windows,
second floor balconies, and accent roofs; or
f. Any other element of architectural
variation as approved by the Director of Planning.
(P)
7. Roofing.
a. Roofing materials shall consist of
dimensional architectural shingles, standing metal
seam, or better with a minimum 30-year warranty or
better.
b. Varied roof designs and pitches shall be
used on facades of dwellings that face a street. Main
roof pitch shall be 7/12, and there shall be a
minimum roof overhang of 12 inches on main gables.
Roof pitch may be altered or decreased to match the
architectural style of the home. Porches and dormer
pitches may be less than 7/12. (P)
8. Porches, Stoops, and Decks.
a. Front porches and stoops: All front
porches and stoops, including wrap porches, shall be
a minimum of five feet (5’) deep. Handrails,
railings, and pickets, when provided or required by
the building code shall be finished in painted wood,
vinyl, metal, or other similar material, but shall
not be constructed of pressure treated wood whether
stained or in a natural state. Columns supporting the
roof and located on a street facing facade shall
include decorative elements such as masonry piers,
tapered round columns, or square box columns. The
design of the base shall match and compliment the
architectural style of the dwelling. Raised porches
shall have full foundations consisting of materials
included in Proffered Condition 4. Porch foundation
materials need not match those of the main
foundation, but shall be complimentary in color and
materials.
b. Rear Decks: Rear decks visible from the
5/27/2026 Page 41 of 95
public right of way may be constructed of pressure
treated wood, and decks that are visible from the
public right of way shall have lattice or other
higher quality screening between support
columns. Handrails and railings, when required by
building code, shall be finished painted wood or
metal railing with vertical pickets, swan balusters
or other products of equal quality. (P)
9. Driveways and Front Walkways. All driveways
shall be paved with asphalt, concrete, or pavers.
Concrete may be comprised of exposed aggregate or
stamped and/or tinted to complement the architectural
style and colors of the dwelling. The driveway shall
connect to the front porch or stoop by a sidewalk no
less than three feet (3’) wide. The sidewalk may be
constructed of concrete, exposed aggregate, stamped
concrete, or pavers. (P)
10. Chimneys. All chimneys shall be built to the
following design standards:
a. Wood burning fireplace chimneys shall be
constructed of masonry materials. Materials need not
match the materials used for the main foundation, but
shall be complimentary in color and texture.
b. Materials used to enclose the fireplace
box of a direct vent fireplace shall match the
adjacent fade. (P)
11. Vehicular Access. Direct access to/from River
Road shall be limited to one (1) access with the
exact location approved by the Transportation
Department. (T)
12. Dedication. In conjunction with recordation of
the initial subdivision plat or within sixty (60)
days from a written request by the Transportation
Department, whichever occurs first, sixty feet (60’)
of right-of-way along the south side of River Road,
measured from the centerline of that part of the road
immediately adjacent to the Property shall be
dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for the
benefit of Chesterfield County. (T)
13. Road Improvements. In conjunction with initial
development of the property, the following road
improvements shall be completed by the
owner/developer, as determined by the Transportation
Department. The exact design, length, and/or other
modifications shall be approved by the Chesterfield
County Transportation Department (“Transportation
Department”).
a. Construction of additional pavement
along River Road at the approved access to provide a
separate left turn lane.
b. Construction of additional pavement
along River Road at the approved access to provide a
separate right turn lane.
5/27/2026 Page 42 of 95
c. Construction of a VDOT standard shared
use path along the property’s frontage to River Road,
or alternative pedestrian accommodation as supported
by the county’s Comprehensive Plan, as determined by
the Transportation Department.
d. Widening/improving the Property’s
frontage along River Road to a eleven foot (11’) wide
travel lane, measured from the centerline of the
existing pavement, with an additional five foot (5’)
wide paved shoulder plus a three foot (3’) wide
unpaved shoulder and overlaying the full width of
River Road along the Property’s frontage with a
minimum of one and one-half inches (1.5”) of
compacted bituminous asphalt concrete, with
modifications approved by the Transportation
Department, for the entire property frontage.
e. Dedication to the County, free and
unrestricted, any additional right-of-way and/or
easements required for the improvements identified
above. (T)
14. Public Water Easement. The subdivision plat
shall include a ten foot (10’) wide temporary
construction and a sixteen foot (16’) wide permanent
public water easement along the property frontage
along the River Road property line, outside of the
ultimate right-of-way to facilitate the future
extension of a public water line. (U)
15. Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning
(HVAC) Units and Generators. Units shall initially be
screened from view of roads by landscaping or low
maintenance material, as approved by the Planning
Department. (P)
16. Foundation Planting. Foundation plantings
shall be required along the entire front façade of
all residential dwelling units and shall extend along
all sides of such units facing a street. Foundation
planting beds shall be a minimum of four feet (4’)
wide measured from the dwelling unit foundation.
Foundation planting beds shall contain a minimum of
fifty (50) percent evergreen material with one (1)
shrub per three (3) linear feet wide as measured from
the unit foundation within a minimum planting bed
depth of four feet (4’), unless modified at the time
of plans review. Unit corners shall be visually
softened with vertical accent shrubs (4’-5’ at the
time of planting) or small evergreen trees (6’-8’ at
the time of planting). Plantings shall include native
species and/or drought-resistant plants when located
in non-irrigated beds in order to minimize the need
for irrigation. Planting bed deviations may be
approved by the Planning Department at the time of
plans review due to unique design circumstances. (P)
17. Garages. Any garage door visible from a public
street shall use an upgraded garage door. An upgraded
garage door is any door with a minimum of three (3)
enhanced features. Enhanced features shall include
windows, raised panels, decorative panels, arches,
5/27/2026 Page 43 of 95
ornamental hardware or other architectural features
on the exterior that enhance the entry (i.e.
decorative lintels, shed roof overhangs arches,
columns, keystones, eyebrows, etc.). Flat panel
garage doors shall be prohibited. (P)
18. Private Asphalt Sidewalks. Private asphalt
sidewalks shall be provided in the development along
one-side of designated internal roadways, as
generally shown on the Conceptual Plan. The private
asphalt sidewalks are to be constructed outside of
the ultimate right-of-way and be a minimum of eight
(8) feet wide. The exact design and location of the
private asphalt sidewalks shall be reviewed and
approved in connection with plan approval. The
private asphalt sidewalks shall be constructed with
asphalt. The private asphalt sidewalks shall be
developed concurrently with the roadway it serves. (P
& EE)
19. Access and Maintenance Easement. The
subdivision plat shall include a ten foot (10’) wide
Access and Maintenance Easement to grant the
Homeowners’ Association rights for access in and to
the easement area for maintenance, as well as grant
access to the future homeowners within the
subdivision for use of the private asphalt sidewalks.
(P & EE)
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
C. 24SN1353 - Sawmill Station Mixed Use Rezoning &
Adjustments — Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Sawmill Station
Mixed Use Rezoning & Adjustments is a request to
rezone from Agricultural (A) to Corridor Commercial
(CC) of 24.47 acres, Transition Residential (TR) of
14 acres, and Alternative Residential (AR) of 92.5
acres with adjustments to ordinance requirements for
development standards on the entire 130.97 acre
development plus conditional use on 8.22 acres to
permit townhouse dwellings and amendment of zoning
district map fronting in two (2) places for
approximately 1,450 feet on the north side of Hull
Street Road, 2,150 feet west of Magnolia Market
Avenue, known as 18900 Hull Street Road. The 130.97
acre property is proposed for a maximum development
of 860 units. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for Regional Mixed-Use. Tax
IDs 698-666-3718, 8859; 699-666-2969; 699-667-5963;
699-668-8633; 700-666-2325; and 700-667-1418.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
Jerry Turner encouraged the Board to deny the case.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
5/27/2026 Page 44 of 95
public hearing was closed.
Mr. Carroll stated the developer will be paying full
proffers and not getting credit for other road
construction projects they have to do as a part of
this.
Questions and discussion ensued between Mr. Carroll
and Deputy County Administrator Matt Harris relative
to the establishment of a community development
authority (CDA). Mr. Harris noted that the Board set
a public hearing for June 24, 2026, to consider the
establishment of the Sawmill Station Community
Development Authority.
Mr. Carroll then made a motion, seconded by Dr.
Hylton, for the Board to approve Case 24SN1353,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
In response to Ms. Schneider's question relative to
the cost of the units, Jeffrey Geiger stated the
cottages would cost approximately $350,000, and the
single-family houses would cost approximately
$399,000.
Additional questions and discussion ensued relative
to CDA and homeowners association (HOA) fees,
assessments, market value, housing affordability,
housing trust funds, and adding infrastructure.
Dr. Miller then called for a vote on Mr. Carroll's
motion, seconded by Dr. Hylton, for the Board to
approve Case 24SN1353, subject to the following
conditions:
Proffered Conditions
The property owners and the applicant in this
rezoning case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the
Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning
Ordinance of Chesterfield County, Sections 19.2-1 et.
seq. (the “Zoning Ordinance”), for themselves and
their successors or assigns, proffer that the
property under consideration (the “Property”) will be
developed according to the following proffers if, and
only if, the rezoning request submitted herewith is
granted with only those conditions agreed to by the
owners and applicant. In the event this request is
denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by
the owners and applicant, the proffers shall
immediately be null and void and of no further force
or effect.
The accompanying rezoning application requests three
(3) different zoning districts (being CC, TR and AR)
for the Property, as such zoning district boundaries
are shown on the “Rezoning Exhibit” dated March 18,
2026, prepared by D.R. Horton and Land Planning
Solutions, and submitted with the accompanying
rezoning application. Within the AR district, the
Residential, Townhome use will be developed under the
TR district standards as permitted by Note 2 in the
AR district.
5/27/2026 Page 45 of 95
APPLICABLE TO ALL ZONING DISTRICTS
1. Pattern Book. The Property shall be developed
in general conformance with the layout, building
illustrations and information set forth in the
Pattern Book entitled “Sawmill Station Mixed-Use
Community Chesterfield, VA Design Guidelines”, dated
April 13, 2026, prepared by D.R. Horton and Land
Planning Solutions, and filed herewith, or as it may
be updated in accordance with these proffered
conditions (the “Pattern Book”), which illustrations
and information are conceptual in nature and may vary
in detail. Detail information in the Pattern Book,
such as pedestrian path locations, sidewalk
locations, building footprints, lot location and
design, amenity space and strategic amenity space
improvements and locations, parking area design and
locations, and the locations of other improvements,
may be adjusted under the general conformance
standard for the Pattern Book. Further, the
Conceptual Master Plan shown on Page 4 of the Pattern
Book is merely an illustration of how the project
could be designed, and the actual location of uses
shall be governed by the Conceptual Plan (defined
below) and the development and design of each of the
uses in the locations in accordance with the
Conceptual Plan shall be governed by the applicable
zoning district standards, these proffered
conditions, and the Pattern Book (but excluding Page
4). In the event a subdivision plan or site plan, as
applicable, is not in general conformance with the
foregoing, substantial changes may be approved in any
subdivision plan or site plan at the time of plans
review, or at any other time permitted by the
Planning Director, upon the Planning Director’s
finding that the changes are generally in keeping
with the spirit and concept of the Pattern Book. (P)
2. Conceptual Plan.
a. The Property shall be developed in
general conformance with the Conceptual Land Use
Plan, as shown on Page 3 of the Pattern Book (the
“Conceptual Plan”). Different uses may be located
within each landbay based on the uses listed within
each landbay on the Conceptual Plan or as specified
herein. The Conceptual Plan is conceptual in nature
and may vary based on the final approved subdivision
plans or site plan, as applicable, depending on the
final soil studies, RPA lines, wetlands, road and
alley design, final parcel and lot line, amenity
locations, VDOT requirements, BMP design and
location, pedestrian way design and location, and
other design or engineering reasons. Any substantial
changes that do not relate to the prior sentence may
be approved by the Planning Director upon the
Director’s finding that the changes are generally in
keeping with the spirit and concept of the Pattern
Book. In the event of any conflict between
information shown on the Conceptual Plan and these
Proffered Conditions, these Proffered Conditions
shall control. For clarity, any proffer that refers
5/27/2026 Page 46 of 95
to the Conceptual Plan shall be a reference to the
Conceptual Plan as may need to be modified as
permitted in this paragraph.
b. Front-loaded garages shall be prohibited
on any residential lot fronting on any street
designated as a “priority street” on the Conceptual
Plan. Such lots shall be developed in general
conformance with the development criteria shown
elsewhere in the Pattern Book for rear-loaded
townhomes, cottages, or single-family uses on
priority streets. Additionally, no lot shall be
positioned to have a rear yard oriented towards any
street designated as a “priority street” on the
Conceptual Plan. (P)
3. Transportation Density. For transportation
purposes, the maximum density of this development
shall be 210 single family detached housing lots, 295
townhomes (single family attached) housing units, 264
multifamily housing (low-rise) units, 100,000 square
feet of shopping plaza (without supermarket), 6,500
square feet of fast-food restaurant with drive-
through widow, and convenience store/gas station
(5.5-10 ksf) with 12 fuel pumps, or equivalent
density, as reviewed and approved by the Chesterfield
County Transportation Department (the “Transportation
Department”). (T)
4. Residential Density Cap. There shall not be
more than 780 residential dwellings within the
project.
a. Possible Additional Density.
Notwithstanding the foregoing cap on residential
dwellings, in the event that the Transportation
Department or VDOT does not permit the southwestern
portion of the Property, located to the west of
County GPIN 6996650687 (the “Limited Access Area”),
to have direct vehicular access/entrance onto to Hull
Street Road (i.e. at a minimum a right-in, right-out
entrance), then the cap on residential dwellings
shall increase to 860. (P)
5. Phasing of Commercial. There shall be no more
than five hundred 500 dwelling units issued building
permits on the Property until the following have
occurred: the site plan for the portion of Commercial
Tract A east of the main entrance shall have been
approved, building permits issued for each building
shown on such site plan, and land disturbance
commenced within this area, unless otherwise modified
by the Planning Director at the time of plans review
for subsequent phases of residential development
based on the intent of having some degree of
commercial development having begun. (P)
6. Utilities.
a. Public water and wastewater shall be
used.
b. The developer shall submit to the
5/27/2026 Page 47 of 95
Utilities Department for review and approval a
wastewater system hydraulic analysis to verify
downstream capacity, prior to or in conjunction with
the first site or construction plan submittal. Any
capacity related improvements necessary to support
the wastewater demands of this development shall be
the responsibility of the developer and shall be
reflected on the site or construction plan.
c. Prior to any preliminary subdivision
plan or site plan approval, whichever occurs first, a
utility plan for the Property shall be submitted to
and approved by the Utilities Department (the
“Overall Water and Wastewater Plan”). Utilities for
this development, and phasing thereof, shall conform
to the approved utilities plan or as otherwise
approved by the Utilities Department.
d. Following the approval of an Overall
Water and Wastewater Plan, upon request of the
County, access to the property and easements shall be
provided, at no cost on standard County documents, in
the location of improvements generally shown on the
Overall Water and Wastewater Plan, for the
construction of public water and/or wastewater lines
independent of the timing of this development.
e. The on-site public wastewater system
shall be designed with sufficient depth to serve the
natural service area, including adjacent properties
identified as GPINs 699-665-0687, and 699-665-
5783. A wastewater line extension with terminal
manhole, within a public wastewater easement, shall
be provided to the property line for each of the
aforementioned properties, such that on-site
improvements are not disturbed by future extensions.
(U)
7. Environmental Engineering.
a. Super Silt Fence, or an alternative as
approved by the Department of Environmental
Engineering, shall be provided as a perimeter control
in locations where standard silt fence would have
been required.
b. Sediment traps and sediment basins sized
at least 25% larger than the minimum Virginia
Stormwater Management Handbook’s standard shall be
provided.
c. Anionic PAM, Flexible Growth Medium
and/or a Chesterfield County (the “County”) approved
equivalent shall be applied to denuded areas during
construction and at final stabilization in the
locations shown on plans approved by Environmental
Engineering at the time of plans review.
d. The maximum post-development discharge
rate for the 100-year storm shall be based on the
maximum capacity of the existing facilities
downstream, and shall not increase the recorded and
/or established 100-year backwater and /or
floodplain. On-Site detention of the post-development
5/27/2026 Page 48 of 95
100-year discharge rate to below the pre-development
100-year discharge rate may be provided to satisfy
this requirement. (EE)
8. Police Department.
a. CBU Lighting. Cluster Box Units (“CBU”)
shall be lighted so that there is a minimum foot
candle of 0.5 fc at the 20’ circumference measured
from the center of the CBU, unless otherwise required
by VDOT or otherwise approved by the Police
Department at the time of plans review. (Police)
9. Transportation Department.
a. Dedications. The following rights-of-way
shall be dedicated, free and unrestricted, to and for
the benefit of Chesterfield County, prior to final
site plan approval, in conjunction with the
recordation of the initial subdivision plat, or
within sixty (60) days of a written request by the
Transportation Department, whichever occurs first.
Unless specified below, the exact location of the
right-of-way dedication shall be approved by the
Transportation Department.
i. One hundred (100) feet of right-
of-way measured from the centerline of Hull Street
Road (Route 360) immediately adjacent to the
Property.
ii. A portion of the 7.7 acre
Commercial Tract A, as shown on the Conceptual Plan,
being 2.33 acres, with the eastern portion of this
2.33 acre area having the following call: 748.86’ N
18d 14’ 10” W; as measured from the following point
of beginning N: 3,665,685.15, E: 11,698,379.30. If
Powhite Parkway Extension design/alignment is
modified, as determined by the Transportation
Department, without necessitating the dedication, or
portion thereof, the Transportation Department may
waive this dedication or portion thereof.
iii. Minimum seventy (70) foot
right-of-way for the East/West Collector Road
(“east/west collector”) from the eastern boundary of
Landbay 1 to the eastern boundary of Landbay 2, both
as generally shown on the Conceptual Plan.
iv. Minimum seventy (70) feet of
right-of-way for the North/South Collector Road
(“north/south collector”) from Route 360 to the
western boundary of Landbay 6, as generally shown on
the Conceptual Plan; and
If requested by the Developer and accepted by the
Transportation Department, the above right-of-way
dedications may be phased in accordance with an
approved phasing plan. Prior to any preliminary,
subdivision, or site plan approval, a phasing plan
for the proffered right-of-way dedications shall be
submitted to and approved by the Transportation
Department.
b. Access.
5/27/2026 Page 49 of 95
v. No direct vehicular access shall
be provided from the Property to the North/South
Thoroughfare Road (“Powhite Parkway”).
vi. Direct vehicular access from the
Property to/from Hull Street Road (Route 360) shall
be limited to (i) one (1) full movement
entrance/exit, as approved by the Virginia Department
of Transportation (VDOT), (ii) one easternmost access
which shall be limited to right-in/right-out
vehicular movement (unless crossover modifications
along Hull Street Road permit left-in access), which
entrance may be located on the Property or on GPIN
701668100100000, and (iii) one entrance for the
Limited Access Area, but only if approved by the
Transportation Department and VDOT. The exact
location of the vehicular access(es) shall be
approved by the Transportation Department and in
accordance with VDOT requirements at the time of
plans review.
c. Internal Public Roads.
i. The public roads projected to
carry 1,500 vehicles per day (vpd) or greater are
identified as “Public Collector Roads and Priority
Streets” on the Conceptual Plan and these roads shall
be designed and constructed as “no lot” access
road(s) and classified as a “Residential Collector”,
unless otherwise required by VDOT(“Public Collector
Roads”). Individual lots shall not have direct
vehicular access to the road, unless otherwise
approved accordance with the county’s Stub Road
Policy.
ii. Individual lots shall not have
direct vehicular access to other public roads
identified as “Public Local Streets and Priority
Streets” on the Conceptual Plan (also “Public
Collector Roads”), unless otherwise approved at the
time of plans review and otherwise required by VDOT.
These roads shall otherwise be designed and built to
local street standards.
d. Road Improvements. The following road
improvements shall be completed by the owner of the
Property or by others. Any modification to the
alignment, design and length specified below shall be
approved by the Chesterfield County Transportation
Department (“Transportation Department”). If any of
the road improvements identified below are provided
by others, as determined by the Transportation
Department, then the specific road improvement shall
no longer be required. The timing for the provision
of these improvements may be adjusted by a phasing
plan approved by the Transportation Department at the
time of plans review.
i. Off-Site:
1. Construction of pavement
along the westbound lanes of Hull Street Road (Route
360) for the entire Property frontage to provide an
additional lane of pavement (future third thru lane).
5/27/2026 Page 50 of 95
Improvement shall be completed in conjunction with
the Property’s direct vehicular access to Route 360.
(Note: This widening is in addition to any turn lanes
required for site access or intersection
improvements.)
2. Route 360/Doss Road/Site
Access Crossover/Median Break:
a. Construction of
westbound left turn lane (minimum 200-foot storage);
b. Construction of a
westbound right turn lane (minimum 200-foot storage);
c. Construction of
eastbound dual left turn lanes (minimum 300-foot
storage);
d. Construction of a
six (6) lane section for the north/south collector (2
northbound lanes and 4 southbound lanes with one
southbound lane stripped as a median to accommodate
additional southbound lane for future intersection
capacity), unless fewer lanes are required for a
thru-cut intersection design per VDOT design
requirements; and
e. Intersection
control as supported by the Transportation Department
and VDOT.
(Note: It’s anticipated this will be a thru-cut
traffic signal; however, this will be subject to
further review and approval by VDOT at time of plans
review.)
3. Construction of additional
pavement along the westbound lanes of Route 360 to
provide a left turn lane (minimum 200-foot storage)
at the existing crossover/median break located
approximately 850 feet west of the Route 360/Doss
Road/Site Access crossover/median break. This
improvement shall be provided in conjunction with the
initial vehicular access to Route 360.
ii. On-Site:
1. Construction of a three
(3) lane section for east/west collector with
pedestrian accommodations to VDOT Urban Collector
standards with a 30-mph design speed from the eastern
boundary of Landbay 1 to the eastern boundary of
Landbay 2, both as shown on the Conceptual Plan, with
any modifications approved by the Transportation
Department.
2. Construction of a (i) four
(4) lane divided road section for the north/south
collector with pedestrian accommodations along both
sides to VDOT Urban Collector standards (30 mph) from
Route 360 to the intersection of the north/south
collector and the east/west collector, with any
modification approved by the Transportation
Department, and (ii) a three (3) lane section with
pedestrian accommodations along both sides to VDOT
Urban Collector standards with a 30-mph design speed
for the portion of the north/south collector from its
5/27/2026 Page 51 of 95
intersection with the east/west collector to the
western boundary of Landbay 6, as generally shown on
the Conceptual Plan, with any modification approved
by the Transportation Department.
3. Construction of additional
pavement along the westbound lanes or Route 360 at
each approved vehicular access to provide a separate
right turn lane (minimum 200-foot storage). Each such
additional right turn lane shall be provided in
conjunction with the construction of each vehicular
access.
4. Construction of a VDOT
standard sidewalk along the Property’s frontage along
Route 360.
iii. Dedication. Dedication to the
County or VDOT, as applicable, free and unrestricted,
of any additional right-of-way or easements required
for the improvements identified above. In the event
the developer is unable to acquire any “off-site”
right-of-way that is necessary for the road
improvements described in this proffered condition,
the developer may request, in writing, that the
County acquire such right-of-way as a public road
improvement. All costs associated with the
acquisition of the right-of-way shall be approved and
borne by the developer. In the event the County
chooses not to assist the developer in acquisition of
the “off-site” right-of-way, the developer shall be
relieved of the obligation to acquire the “off-site”
right-of-way and shall provide the road improvements
within available right-of-way as determined by the
Transportation Department and the road improvements
provided within available right of way shall be
deemed to satisfy the applicable requirement in this
proffered condition.
iv. Transportation Phasing Plan.
Prior to any site plan or construction plan approval
on the Property as determined by the Transportation
Department, a phasing plan for the proffered road
improvements, as identified above, shall be submitted
to and approved by the Transportation Department. The
phasing for the road improvements specified in the
proffered condition may be adjusted if approved by
the Transportation Department at time of plans
review.
e. Road Cash Proffer. The applicant, sub-
divider, or its assignee(s) shall pay to the County
$9,400 for each dwelling unit constructed on the
Property, for road improvements within the service
district for the Property (“Road Cash Proffer”). Each
payment shall be made prior to the issuance of a
final certificate of occupancy for such dwelling unit
unless state law modifies the timing of the payment.
Should the County impose impact fees at any time
during the life of the development that are
applicable to the Property, the amount paid in Road
Cash Proffers shall be in lieu of or credited toward,
but not be in addition to, any impact fees, in a
5/27/2026 Page 52 of 95
manner determined by the County. The Road Cash
Proffer payment shall be paid in addition to the
owner/developer’s obligation to construct the
transportation improvements identified in the “Road
Improvements” proffered above, and shall not be
construed to offset or satisfy that obligation. (T)
10. Adjustments.
a. Buffers Adjacent to Roads in
Subdivisions. No buffer shall be required along the
roads identified as “Public Collector Roads and
Priority Streets” and “Public Local Streets and
Priority Streets” as identified on the Conceptual
Plan given the pedestrian improvements, street trees,
intentional design between adjacent commercial and
residential uses, and the prohibition of dwellings
backing up to these types of streets.
b. Buffer Adjacent to Taylor Ridge. No
perimeter buffer shall be required along the eastern
project line, north of the east-west “Public
Collector Road and Priority Street” because a natural
buffer between residential uses will be provided by
environmentally protected land.
c. TR District Building Setback. The
building setback from collector roads may be reduced
to a minimum of fifteen (15) feet and landscaping
requirements reduced as specified below to allow for
better building engagement with the streetscape.
Where the building setback is reduced to between
fifteen (15) feet and twenty-five (25) feet, the
following improvements shall be provided: (i) where
street trees are provided the selected tree species
shall provide a narrower tree canopy and grow in a
more up-right manner, and (ii) along the building
foundation with this reduced setback, foundation
planting beds shall be provided along the entire
building foundation, excluding entry ways, stairs and
walkways. Foundation planting beds shall contain a
minimum of fifty (50) percent evergreen material with
one (1) shrub per three (3) linear feet wide as
measured from the foundation within a minimum
planting bed depth of four feet (4’), unless modified
at the time of plans review.
d. TR District Parking Setback Exterior
Property Lines. The parking lot setback from project
perimeters (with such perimeters determined at the
time of zoning based on the boundaries of the land
being rezoned) may be reduced to a minimum of fifteen
(15) feet because a natural buffer between
residential uses will be provided by environmentally
protected land. Where existing vegetation does not
exist, plantings shall be provided to meet the
perimeter landscaping requirements specified in the
Zoning Ordinance.
e. TR District Parking Setback Along Roads.
The parking lot setback from roads may be reduced to
a minimum of fifteen (15) feet provided that parking
spaces are located no closer to collector and
5/27/2026 Page 53 of 95
residential collector roads than the closest building
façade to the applicable collector or residential
collector road. The requirements for Perimeter
Landscaping Type C shall be provided, as specified in
Table 19.2-41.1 of the Zoning Ordinance, unless a
different planting standard is approved at the time
of plans review.
f. Building and Parking Setbacks along
Internal Collector Roads in CC District. The building
and parking setback from internal collector and
residential collector roads may be reduced to a
minimum of ten (10) feet and landscaping requirements
reduced as specified below to allow for better
building engagement with the streetscape. Where the
building setback is reduced to between ten (10) feet
and twenty-five (25) feet, the following improvements
shall be provided: (i) where street trees are
provided the selected tree species shall provide a
narrower tree canopy and grow in a more up-right
manner, and (ii) along the building foundation with
this reduced setback, foundation planting beds shall
be provided along the entire building foundation,
excluding entry ways, outdoor dining areas or
gathering areas, stairs and walkways. Foundation
planting beds shall contain a minimum of fifty (50)
percent evergreen material with one (1) shrub per
three (3) linear feet wide as measured from the
foundation within a minimum planting bed depth of
three feet (3’), unless modified at the time of plans
review.
g. Garage Doors for Townhome Lots Developed
Under TR Standards. To accommodate a two-car garage,
the maximum total garage door width (as a percent of
total building row length) requirement for front-
loaded townhomes developed under the TR standards
shall be changed from 60% to 80%, and each two-car
garage shall (i) be framed with a masonry material
(which may be expanded in accordance with the options
outlined in requirement (iii) below), (ii) include a
minimum of three (3) enhanced features, and (iii)
include either a shed roof overhang, ornamental
features above the garage doors, spacing between
garage openings, or the full first level of the home
(façade only) consisting of masonry material.
Enhanced features shall include windows, raised
panels, decorative panels, arches, ornamental
hardware or other architectural features on the
exterior that enhance the entry (i.e. decorative
lintels, shed roof overhangs arches, columns,
keystones, eyebrows, etc.). In addition, flat panel
garage doors are also prohibited on these garage
doors within lots constructed to the TR standards.
(P)
11. Amenities. Strategic amenity space will be
improved as active recreation, a plaza, or a
community garden, unless another type of strategic
amenity space is selected by the owner at the time of
plans review. The area generally illustrated on the
Conceptual Plan by the label “Clubhouse & Strategic
Amenity Area” shall be improved with a clubhouse and
5/27/2026 Page 54 of 95
a pool for use by residents within the AR District.
The area generally illustrated on the Conceptual Plan
by the label “Clubhouse” in Landbay 2 shall be
improved with a clubhouse and a pool for use by
residents within the TR District. (P)
12. Pedestrian Paths in RPA. In Resource
Protection Areas, pedestrian paths may be located in
a meandering manner through the Resource Protection
Areas in accordance with the Department of
Environmental Quality’s Riparian Buffers Modification
and Mitigation Guidance Manual, with the final
location, design and material to be approved by the
Director of Environmental Engineering at the time of
plans review and approval. A shared use or pedestrian
path may be located within sewer easements located in
Resource Protection Areas. The exact location, width,
design and material(s) to be used for this path shall
be shown on the site plan or subdivision plat
submitted and is subject to review and approval by
the Directors of Environmental Engineering and
Utilities, or their designee. Prior to construction
of the shared use path, the owner shall enter into
all applicable agreements necessary to allow the
encroachments within any areas of interest to, or
regulatory authority of, Chesterfield County. (EE, U,
P)
13. Coordination with Taylor Ridge. The
owner/developer shall coordinate with the
owner/developer of the land currently identified as
County GPINs 701668100100000 and 701669114100000
(Rezoning Case No. 23SN0124) to ensure a cohesive
design aesthetic and identity between the property
and the planned Taylor Ridge development by featuring
complimentary and coordinating design requirements
for non-residential buildings, building and pavement
materials, street light fixtures, street signage,
street trees, and landscaping materials, commercial
monument signage along Hull Street Road (Route 360)
frontage, residential community signage, and design
of sidewalk pathway connections where public streets
cross shared property lines. The coordination
required by this condition shall be reflected in the
initial submittal for plans review and shall be
subject to approval by the Director of Planning, in
accordance with this proffered condition. (P)
APPLICABLE TO THE CC DISTRICT (Being Commercial Tract A and Commercial Tract B on the Conceptual Plan)
14. Commercial. Commercial uses shall be developed
in the general locations shown on the Conceptual Plan
by the label “Commercial Tract A” and “Commercial
Tract B”. The exact location and size of the
individual tracts shall be determined by the
applicant’s preliminary subdivision plat or site plan
submission. (P)
15. Limitation on Commercial Uses.
a. The following commercial uses shall be
5/27/2026 Page 55 of 95
prohibited: cocktail lounges and nightclubs, second
hand stores, flea market, kennels and outside runs
associated with veterinary clinics and hospitals,
funeral home, mortuary, taxidermy, coin operated dry
cleaning and/or laundry services, laundromat,
motorcycle sales and rentals, theaters, automobile
sales and rentals, automobile repair, car wash
(except as allowed below), antique shop, consignment
store, crematorium, and halfway house.
b. Only one (1) instance of the following
use shall be permitted: convenience store with
fueling stations with the option to add a car wash.
Further, the convenience store with fueling stations
use shall be located only within Commercial Tract A.
c. Only four (4) instances of the
following uses shall be permitted: drive-through
window. Further, only two (2) drive-through windows
may be located within the portion of Commercial Tract
A located on both sides of the main entrance, as such
tract is illustrated on the Conceptual Plan. The
other two (2) drive-through windows may be located
within the portion of Commercial Tract A located on
the west side of the project, as such tract is
illustrated on the Conceptual Plan and shown on the
Conceptual Plan as containing approximately 7.7 acres
(the “Commercial Tract A +/- 7.7 AC”). (P)
16. Architecture.
a. Any building constructed on the
Property shall be developed with an architectural
appearance generally consistent with the
architectural style illustrated on Page 23 of the
Pattern Book. Owners and tenants will be permitted to
include prototypical or corporate buildings and
identification architectural elements in the design
of their building provided that these elements do not
qualify as signage. Any substantial modifications or
deviations to the required general architectural
shall be approved by the Planning Director if the
Director finds the alternative architecture in
keeping with the spirit and intent of the
architectural style illustrated on Page 23 of the
Pattern Book.
b. Commercial uses in Commercial Tract B
shall be developed such that buildings are oriented
towards streets designated as “priority streets” on
the Conceptual Plan and parking shall not be located
closer to the street than the building façade that
faces the same street. (P)
17. Materials. Acceptable siding materials include
brick, brick veneer, stone, stone veneer, cultured
stone, other masonry materials, fiber cement siding,
metal siding, engineered wood siding, and high-grade
vinyl (a minimum of .044” nominal thickness as
evidenced by manufacturer’s printed literature).
Dutch lap and plywood are not permitted. Other
materials may be used for parapets, cornices,
soffits, surrounds, trim, awnings, architectural
5/27/2026 Page 56 of 95
decorations, and design elements. Roofing material
for a sloped roof shall be standing seam metal or
dimensional architectural shingles with a minimum of
30-year warranty, unless a different material
satisfying the same minimum warranty is approved by
the Planning Director at the time of plans review.
Flat roofs may use alternative material with a
similar warranty. (P)
18. Community Connect. In the event an exterior
video surveillance camera(s) are used on the
Property, the owner of the business operating the
exterior camera(s) shall link exterior video feeds
with the Chesterfield County Police Department’s
(CCPD) analytic and strategic operations center upon
the terms in effect at the time of rezoning approval,
unless otherwise agreed to by the owner of the
business and CCPD. (Police)
APPLICABLE TO THE TR DISTICT (Being Landbay 2 Multifamily on the Conceptual Plan)
19. Architecture. Any apartment building shall be
constructed in general conformance with the
illustrative elevations as shown on Page 20 of the
Pattern Book, or another architectural appearance
approved by the Planning Director if the Director
finds the alternative architecture in keeping with
the spirit and intent of the architectural style
illustrated on Page 20 of the Pattern Book. (P)
20. Exterior Materials.
a. Roofing material for a sloped roof
shall be standing seam metal or dimensional
architectural shingles with a minimum of 30-year
warranty, unless a different material satisfying the
same minimum warranty is approved by the Planning
Director at the time of plans review. Flat roofs may
use alternative material with a similar warranty.
b. Acceptable siding materials include
brick, brick veneer, stone, cast stone, cultured
stone, other masonry materials, fiber cement siding,
decorative metal panels, engineered wood siding,
high-grade vinyl (a minimum of .044” nominal
thickness as evidenced by manufacturer’s printed
literature), or another masonry architectural element
approved by the Planning Director, or another
material approved by the Planning Director.
Corrugated metal siding and EIFS shall not be used,
unless approved by the Planning Director. Plywood
siding is not permitted. Other materials may be used
for parapets, cornices, soffits, surrounds, trim,
architectural decorations, and design elements. (P)
21. Three Bedroom. The total number of any three
bedroom apartment units shall not exceed fifteen
percent (15%) of the total number of apartment units.
(P)
22. Parking. All required minimum parking spaces
shall be parked within Landbay 2 as shown on the
Conceptual Plan, and not along any of the Public
5/27/2026 Page 57 of 95
Collector Roads. (P)
23. Floorplan. Labeled PDF building floor plans
shall be provided to the ECC Operations Manager prior
to the certificates of occupancy being issued.
(Police)
APPLICABLE TO THE AR DISTRICT (Being Landbays 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6 on the Conceptual Plan)
24. Foundation Treatment. There shall be a minimum
vertical height of eighteen (18) inches of brick,
brick veneer, stone, stone veneer, or other masonry
material approved by the Planning Director installed
above grade for units with slab-on-grade foundations
on all front, side, and rear elevations. All other
foundations shall be faced entirely of brick, brick
veneer, stone, stone veneer, cultured stone, and/or
other masonry materials; except (i) for units where
the grade drops along the façade foundation this
required masonry may step down at eighteen inch (18”)
intervals limited to two step downs, and (ii) for
units with a walkout basement siding may continue to
the ground level of a walkout basement (aa) if there
is a window or door that shows the presence of a
basement floor or (bb) if there is a first floor
deck. Synthetic or natural stucco foundations may be
permitted for facades constructed entirely of stucco.
(P)
25. Porches & Stoops. Front stoops and porches
shall be constructed with continuous foundation walls
or masonry piers to match the foundation of the home.
Handrails and railings, when required by the building
code, shall be finished with painted wood, vinyl
rails, metal rail systems, or another rail system
approved by the Planning Director at the time of
plans review. Where used, pickets shall be supported
on top and bottom rails that span between columns.
(P)
26. Foundation Plantings. Foundation planting beds
shall be required along the entire front façade of
buildings excluding garages, stairs and walkways
accessing porches and patios. Foundation planting
beds shall be a minimum of four feet (4’) wide
measured from the dwelling unit foundation. Planting
beds shall be defined with a trenched edge or
suitable landscape edging material and shall include
medium shrubs spaced a maximum of four feet (4’)
apart and may include spreading groundcovers. The
plant materials used should visually soften the unit
corners and complement the architecture of the home
at their mature sizes and shall include native
species and/or drought-resistant plants when located
in non-irrigated beds in order to minimize the need
for irrigation. Planting bed deviations may be
approved by the Planning Department at the time of
plans review due to unique design circumstances. (P)
27. Driveways. All private driveways shall be
hardscaped (concrete, asphalt or pavers). If a
5/27/2026 Page 58 of 95
driveway connects to a sidewalk located outside of
the public right of way, then the length of the
driveway shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20’) as
measured from the back of such sidewalk and the face
of a front-loaded garage door. (P)
28. Front Walks. Front walks shall be provided
from the driveway or sidewalk to the front entrance
of a dwelling. All front walks shall be a minimum of
three (3) feet in width and hardscaped (concrete,
asphalt or pavers). (P)
29. High Visibility Side Elevations. Side
elevations that face a public street are required to
be a high visibility side elevation. A high
visibility side elevation shall employ design
features to embellish the side facade. The design
features employed shall include at least two of the
following design elements: two different siding
styles, gables, dormers, shutters, windows and other
architectural features used on the front elevation or
the use of enhanced landscaping to reinforce the
streetscape and minimize the view of the side of the
units with shade trees, fences, hedges, shrubs, or
other acceptable landscape feature to help define the
side yard and street edge. (P)
30. Garage Doors. Any front-loaded garage door
shall use an upgraded garage door. An upgraded garage
door is any door that meets one of the following two
(2) requirements:
a. A minimum of two (2) enhanced features
are provided on the garage door. Enhanced features
shall include windows, raised panels, decorative
panels, arches, ornamental hardware or other
architectural features on the exterior that enhance
the entry (i.e. decorative lintels, shed roof
overhangs arches, columns, keystones, eyebrows, etc.)
Flat panel garage doors shall be prohibited.
b. The garage door provides an enhanced
architectural style that relates to the architecture
of the dwelling the garage serves. Enhanced
architectural style shall mean the use of color,
panels and/or windows to reflect an architectural
style such as contemporary, modern, modern farmhouse,
mediterranean, colonial, and tudor. The architectural
style may be evidenced by manufacturer printed
material. (P)
31. Cottage and Single-Family Detached Lot Widths.
The development shall include the following minimum
lot widths for cottage and single-family detached
dwelling units, with such figures being cumulative
between the two uses:
a. A minimum of 50 lots shall have a
minimum lot width of 25 feet or greater but not equal
to or greater than 44 feet wide (these lots being
referred to herein as “Cottages”); and
b. A minimum of 100 lots shall have a
5/27/2026 Page 59 of 95
minimum lot width equal to or greater than 44 feet
wide. (P)
32. Lighting for Lots Developed in the AR
District. Lighting shall be provided for all dwelling
units in the AR District as follows:
a. For all dwelling units with a front
load garage, a post light will be placed in the front
yard with an additional carriage light near the
garage.
b. For all dwelling units with a rear
entry garage, a post light will be placed in the
front, in addition to a carriage light placed on the
rear of dwelling unit near the garage door. (P)
WITHIN AR DISTRICT AND APPLICABLE TO TOWNHOME DWELLING USES (Landbays 1 (Fee Simple and Common Lot), 4, and 5, and Commercial Tract A +/- 7.7 AC on the Conceptual Plan)
33. Architecture. Construction of townhome
buildings shall be in general conformance with the
architectural appearance of the illustrative townhome
elevations shown on Pages 10 and 11 of the Pattern
Book, or another architectural appearance approved by
the Planning Director if the Director finds the
alternative architecture in keeping with the spirit
and intent of the architectural style illustrated on
Pages 10 and 11 of the Pattern Book. The illustrative
elevations are conceptual in nature and may vary in
detail at the time of plans review. For example, the
location of materials, types of material, use of
stoops, use of covered porches, and other
architectural detailing may change from building to
building. (P)
34. Exterior Facades and Roofs.
a. Roof materials shall be
architectural/dimensional asphalt composition shingle
or better with a minimum 30-year warranty, pre-
finished or real copper, or standing seam metal roof,
plus another material with a similar warranty
approved by the Planning Director. Flat roofs may use
alternative material with a similar warranty.
b. Acceptable siding materials include
brick, stone, masonry, fiber cement siding engineered
wood siding, or high-grade vinyl (a minimum of .044”
nominal thickness as evidenced by manufacturer’s
printed literature). Dutch lap, plywood, and metal
siding are not permitted. Other materials may be used
for parapets, cornices, surrounds, soffits, trim,
architectural decorations, and design elements. (P)
35. Variation in Front Elevations. Townhome units
with the same front elevation may not be located next
to each other. Variation in the front elevation may
not be achieved by simply mirroring the façade, but
may be accomplished by providing at least three (3)
5/27/2026 Page 60 of 95
of the following architectural changes:
a. Adding masonry elements above the
masonry required for the foundation.
b. Changing the location of roof type,
roof line, front facing gable(s) and/or dormers.
c. Changing the style of roof type, roof
line, front facing gable(s) and/or dormers.
d. Providing varied siding application
using horizontal siding, shake siding or board and
batten siding.
e. Providing varied color application.
f. Using a third enhanced feature on the
garage door.
g. Adding projections such as bay/box
windows, second floor balconies, or accent roofs.
h. Any other element of architectural
variation as approved by the Director of Planning.
In addition, this variation obligation may be
achieved on a building-by-building basis if approved
by the Director of Planning at the time of plans
review and approval. (P)
WITHIN AR DISTRICT AND APPLICABLE TO SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING USES (Landbays 1 (Fee Simple and Common Lot), 3, 6, and Commercial Tract A +/- 7.7 AC on the Conceptual Plan)
36. Architecture. Development of single family
detached dwellings shall be in general conformance
with the illustrative single-family detached
elevations shown on Pages 16 to 18 of the Pattern
Book, or another architectural appearance approved by
the Planning Director if the Director finds the
alternative architecture in keeping with the spirit
and intent of the architectural style illustrated on
Pages 16 to 18 of the Pattern Book. The illustrative
elevations are conceptual in nature and may vary at
the time of plans review. For example, the location
of materials, types of material, use of stoops, use
of covered porches, and other architectural detailing
may change from building to building. (P)
37. Exterior Facades.
a. Roof materials shall be
architectural/dimensional asphalt composition shingle
or better with a minimum 30-year warranty, pre-
finished or real copper, or standing seam metal roof,
plus another material with a similar warranty
approved by the Planning Director. Flat roofs may use
alternative material with a similar warranty.
b. Acceptable siding materials include
brick, stone, masonry, fiber cement siding,
engineered wood siding or high-grade vinyl (a minimum
of .044” nominal thickness as evidenced by
manufacturer’s printed literature). Dutch lap,
plywood, and metal siding are not permitted. Other
materials may be used for parapets, cornices,
surrounds, soffits, trim, architectural decorations,
and design elements. (P)
5/27/2026 Page 61 of 95
38. Variation in Front Elevations. Buildings with
the same front elevation may not be located next to
each other or across a street from each other.
Variation in the front elevation may not be achieved
by simply mirroring the façade, but may be
accomplished by providing at least three (3) of the
following architectural changes:
a. Adding masonry elements above the
masonry required for the foundation.
b. Changing the location of roof type,
roof line, front facing gable(s) and/or dormers.
c. Changing the style of roof type, roof
line, front facing gable(s) and/or dormers.
d. Providing varied siding application
using horizontal siding, shake siding or board and
batten siding.
e. Providing varied color application.
f. Using a third enhanced feature on the
garage door.
g. Adding projections such as bay/box
windows, second floor balconies, or accent roofs.
h. Any other element of architectural
variation as approved by the Director of Planning.
(P)
WITHIN AR DISTRICT AND APPLICABLE TO COTTAGE DWELLING USES (Landbays 3, 4, 5, and 6 on the Conceptual Plan)
39. Architecture. Development of single family
detached dwellings shall be in general conformance
with the illustrative cottage elevations as shown on
Pages 13 and 14 of the Pattern Book, or another
architectural appearance approved by the Planning
Director if the Director finds the alternative
architecture in keeping with the spirit and intent of
the architectural style illustrated on Pages 13 and
14 of the Pattern Book. The illustrative elevations
are conceptual in nature and may vary at the time of
plans review. For example, the location of materials,
types of material, use of stoops, use of covered
porches, and other architectural detailing may change
from building to building. (P)
40. Exterior Facades.
a. Roof materials shall be
architectural/dimensional asphalt composition shingle
or better with a minimum 30-year warranty, pre-
finished or real copper, or standing seam metal roof,
plus another material with a similar warranty
approved by the Planning Director. Flat roofs may use
alternative material with a similar warranty.
b. Acceptable siding materials include
brick, stone, masonry, fiber cement siding,
engineered wood siding or high-grade vinyl (a minimum
of .044” nominal thickness as evidenced by
manufacturer’s printed literature). Dutch lap,
plywood, and metal siding are not permitted. Other
materials may be used for parapets, cornices,
5/27/2026 Page 62 of 95
surrounds, soffits, trim, architectural decorations,
and design elements. (P)
41. Variation in Front Elevations. Buildings with
the same front elevation may not be located next to
each other or across a street from each other.
Variation in the front elevation may not be achieved
by simply mirroring the façade, but may be
accomplished by providing at least three (3) of the
following architectural changes:
a. Adding masonry elements above the
masonry required for the foundation.
b. Changing the location of roof type,
roof line, front facing gable(s) and/or dormers.
c. Changing the style of roof type, roof
line, front facing gable(s) and/or dormers.
d. Providing varied siding application
using horizontal siding, shake siding or board and
batten siding.
e. Providing varied color application.
f. Using a third enhanced feature on the
garage door.
g. Adding projections such as bay/box
windows, second floor balconies, or accent roofs.
h. Any other element of architectural
variation as approved by the Director of Planning.
(P)
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, and Hylton.
Nays: Schneider.
D. 25SN1072 - Oasis Transportation Amendment - Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Oasis Transportation
Amendment is a request to amend zoning approval (Case
20SN0608) to modify roadway improvements and phasing
plan requirements and amendment of zoning district
map in a Transition Residential (TR) District on
44.04 acres located in the northeast corner of Fox
Club Parkway and Cosby Road. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Residential
Neighborhood 8 use (8.0 units per acre or less) and
Arterial Business use. Tax IDs 715-671-9861 and 6427;
716-671-6277; 717-672-2828 and 7677.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
Mr. Carroll provided additional details about this
case and the original zoning case, 20SN0608. He then
made a motion, seconded by Ms. Schneider, for the
Board to approve Case 25SN1072, subject to the
following conditions:
Proffered Conditions
5/27/2026 Page 63 of 95
The applicant hereby amends Proffered Condition 6.F. of Case 20SN0608 to read as follows:
1. Modify the Cosby Road and Hull Street Road
intersection/crossover to prohibit left-out movements
and realign Cosby Road west of the Dogwood Villas
Drive intersection, as generally shown on Exhibit A
titled, “Oasis Townhomes Cosby Road Improvements –
February 16, 2026”, with any modifications approved
by the Transportation Department and VDOT. (T)
The applicant hereby amends Proffered Condition 7 of Case 20SN0608 to read as follows:
2. Phasing Plan. Prior to any site plan approval,
a phasing plan for the proffered road improvements,
as identified in Proffered Condition 6, shall be
submitted to and approved by the Transportation
Department. As part of the phasing plan, prior to the
issuance of building permits that would permit more
than 250 residential dwelling units, Proffered
Condition 6.F (Modify the Cosby Road and Hull Street
Road intersection/crossover and realign Cosby Road
west of the Dogwood Villas Drive intersection) shall
be completed. A site plan required for the road
improvements in Proffered Condition 6.A (and an
updated traffic study with respect to such road
improvements if required by the Transportation
Department) shall be submitted to the County prior to
the issuance of certificates of occupancy for a
cumulative total of more than 300 dwelling units. If
the Planning Commission does not approve the
construction of such road improvements required in
Proffered Condition 6.A within 90 days of such
submission, then such road improvements required in
Proffered Condition 6.A shall not be required to be
constructed. If the Planning Commission approves the
construction of such road improvements required in
Proffered Condition 6.A within 90 days of such
submission, then such road improvements required in
Proffered Condition 6.A shall be constructed pursuant
to a phasing plan submitted to and approved by the
Transportation Department. (T)
Staff Note: All other proffered conditions of Case 20SN0608 shall remain in full force and effect.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
E. 25SN1234 - Professional Road Amendment and Exceptions
- Midlothian
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Professional Road
Amendment and Exceptions is a request to amend zoning
approval (Case 78SN0160) relative to buffers and
development standards with conditional use planned
development to permit exceptions to ordinance
requirements and amendment of zoning district map in
an Agricultural (A) District on 0.79 acre located in
the northwest corner of Forest Hill Avenue and
Professional Road, known as 2500 Professional Road.
The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
5/27/2026 Page 64 of 95
appropriate for Light Business use. Tax ID 758-718-
5064.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
Jerry Turner spoke in favor of the case.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved Case 25SN1234, subject to the
following conditions:
Proffered Conditions
The Owner-Applicant in this Case 25SN1234 pursuant to
Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as
amended) and the Chesterfield County, Virginia
(“County”) Code of Ordinances, Chapter 19.1 Zoning
Ordinance (2024 or current supplement), for itself
and its successor or assigns, proffers that the
approximately 0.79 acres with Chesterfield County Tax
Identification Number 758718506400000 (known as 2500
Professional Road, the “Property”) will be developed
as set forth below; however, in the event the request
is denied or approved with conditions not agreed to
by the Owner-Applicant, these proffers shall be
immediately null and void and of no further force or
effect.
Conditions 7, 10, 13 and 19 of Zoning Case 78SN0160
are hereby deleted in their entirety for the
Property.
Staff Note: All other conditions previously approved in Zoning Case 78SN0160 will remain in force and effect for the Property.
The Applicant hereby proffers the following
additional conditions for the Property:
1. Exhibits. These proffers shall include the
following exhibits which by this reference are made a
part hereof with the following requirements:
a. Exhibit A— conceptual plan entitled,
“PROFESSIONAL ROAD OFFICE BUILDING, MIDLOTHIAN
DISTRICT, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA, CONCEPTUAL
PLAN”, prepared by Jordan Consulting Engineers, P.C.
dated April 7, 2026 (“Conceptual Plan”). The Property
shall be developed in general conformance with the
Conceptual Plan (Exhibit A). The Conceptual Plan is
conceptual in nature and may vary based on the final
site plan depending on the final soil studies,
building footprints, parking area design and
location, BMP design and location, and other design
or engineering reasons. Any substantive changes that
do not relate to the prior sentence shall be approved
5/27/2026 Page 65 of 95
by the Planning Director at the time of plans review.
In the event of any conflict between information
shown on the Conceptual Plan and these Proffered
Conditions, these Proffered Conditions shall control.
b. Exhibit B – a photo of the existing
structure in the Professional Road Office Park,
depicting the Colonial-style window dormer feature,
shall be provided for any building constructed on the
Property (Exhibit B). (P)
2. Utilities. Public water and wastewater systems
shall be used. (U)
3. Buffers, Setbacks and Tree Preservation.
a. Forest Hill Buffer and Building Setback.
A twenty-five-foot (25’) buffer and building setback,
planted to meet the requirements of Perimeter
Landscape C, shall be provided along Forest Hill
Avenue as shown on the Conceptual Plan (Exhibit
A)(the “Proposed 25’ Buffer and Setback with
Perimeter Landscape ‘C’”).
b. Forest Hill Parking Setback. A thirty-
foot (30’) parking setback shall be provided along
Forest Hill Avenue as shown on the Conceptual Plan
(Exhibit A)(the “Proposed 30’ Parking Setback”).
c. Residential Buffer. A thirty-foot (30’)
buffer, planted to meet one and one-half (1.5) times
the requirements for Perimeter Landscape C, shall be
provided along the western boundary of the Property
adjacent to County GPINs 758-718-3159 and 758-718-
3270, as shown on the Conceptual Plan (Exhibit A)(the
“Proposed 30’ Buffer w/1.5x Perimeter Landscape C”).
d. Professional Road Setback. A fifteen-
foot (15’) setback for parking shall be provided with
plantings that meet one and one-half (1.5) times the
requirement for Perimeter Landscape C, shall be
provided along Professional Road as shown on the
Conceptual Plan (Exhibit A) (the “Proposed 15’
Setback w/ 1.5x Perimeter Landscaping C”).
e. Existing Vegetation Within Buffers.
Healthy existing trees currently existing within the
Forest Hill Buffer and the Residential Buffer that do
not pose an immediate danger of falling into Forest
Hill Avenue (Route 683) shall be preserved to the
maximum extent possible and incorporated into a
landscape plan to be submitted to the Planning
Department at the time of plans review. Any dead or
diseased trees, vegetation, noxious plants, or
invasive species may be removed from the Forest Hill
Buffer and Residential Buffer areas. (P)
4. Development Standards- Chapter 19.1 Zoning
Ordinance. Except as required by the Proffered
Conditions of this zoning request and the Conditions
of Case 78SN0160 remaining in force and effect,
development of the Property shall comply with the
required conditions for the Emerging Growth Design
5/27/2026 Page 66 of 95
District (O & C Districts) development standards set
forth in the County Code of Ordinances, Chapter 19.1
Zoning Ordinance. (P)
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
F. 25SN1338 - Li Accessory Dwelling Unit - Clover Hill
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Li Accessory
Dwelling Unit is a request for conditional use to
permit an accessory dwelling unit (detached) and
amendment of zoning district map in a Suburban
Community (SC) District known as 4800 Blackbird
Drive. The 0.32 acre property is developed with one
(1) single family dwelling and this request proposes
one (1) accessory dwelling unit (detached). The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Residential Neighborhood 4 use (4.0
units per acre or less). Tax ID 741-678-4262.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board approved Case 25SN1338, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. Occupancy. Occupancy of the accessory dwelling
shall be limited to the occupants of the principal
dwelling unit, individuals related to them by blood
marriage, adoption, or guardianship, foster children,
personal guests, or household employees. (P)
2. Deed Restriction. For the purpose of providing
record notice, prior to the issuance of a certificate
of occupancy for the accessory dwelling unit, a deed
restriction shall be recorded setting forth the
limitation in Condition 1. The deed book and page
number of this restriction and a copy of the
restriction as recorded shall be submitted to the
Planning Department. (P)
3. Accessory Dwelling Location, Size, and
Construction Limitations.
a. The accessory dwelling unit shall be
located on the Property as generally depicted in
Exhibit A.
b. The accessory dwelling unit shall not
exceed 660 square feet.
c. A manufactured home shall not be
permitted on the Property. (P)
5/27/2026 Page 67 of 95
4. Utilities Condition. Should the property be
legally subdivided in the future, the owner shall
establish separate water and/or wastewater
connections to each dwelling unit, subject to the
review and approval of the Utilities Department. The
owner shall be responsible for all costs to establish
the new water and/or wastewater connections,
including the payment of connection fees in effect at
the time service is initiated. (U)
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
G. 25SN1353 - Litt Farm Animals - Midlothian
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Litt Farm Animals
is a request for conditional use to permit a farm
(keeping of farm animals) and amendment of zoning
district map in a Suburban Community (SC) District on
4.1 acres known as 1504 Black Heath Road. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Residential Neighborhood 4 use (4.0
units per acre or less). Tax ID 736-711-1952.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the
Board approved Case 25SN1353, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. Use. This conditional use approval shall be for
a farm use, which shall be limited to the keeping of
a maximum of two (2) miniature horses and eighteen
(18) chickens. (P)
2. Non-Transferrable Ownership of Use. This
conditional use approval shall be granted exclusively
to Ashley M. McGarry and Aaron R. Litt and shall not
be transferable nor run with the land. (P)
3. Conceptual Plan. The proposed site layout,
depicting tree preservation areas, shall generally
conform to the layout as shown on Exhibit A. (P)
4. Tree Preservation Areas. Tree preservation
areas shall be maintained with existing trees and
shrubs. Fencing, grazing areas, structures, and
animals shall be prohibited from the following tree
preservation areas:
a. A seventy-five (75) foot tree
preservation area shall be maintained along the
western perimeter (rear yard) of the Property.
5/27/2026 Page 68 of 95
b. A twenty-five (25) foot tree
preservation area shall be maintained along the
northern and southern perimeters (side yard) of the
Property. (P)
5. Commercial Activity. No commercial activity,
such as the breeding or sale of animals, shall be
permitted in conjunction with this use. (P)
6. Animal Waste. All areas associated with the
keeping of horses and chickens shall be cleaned and
made free of waste on a regular basis. Waste shall be
disposed of in an appropriate disposal container that
is periodically removed from the site. In addition,
the property owner shall employ a means of
eliminating any odor problems and propagation of
insects. (P)
7. Keeping of Chickens.
a. Keeping of roosters shall be
prohibited.
b. Slaughtering of chickens does not occur
on site.
c. Building and attached outside run areas
shall be located in the rear yard. (P)
8. Fencing. A fence shall be maintained to contain
miniature horses and chickens within the rear yard of
the property. No animals shall be permitted to graze
outside of the fenced areas. (P)
9. Maintenance of Grazing Area. Operation of
tractors, combines, or other internal combustion-
powered equipment shall be limited to the hours of
7:00 AM to 9:00 PM daily. (P)
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
H. 26SN2014 - Footprints Childcare Family Day Care Home
- Dale
In Dale Magisterial District, Footprints Childcare
Family Day Care Home is a request for conditional use
to permit a family day care home (child) and
amendment of zoning district map in a Suburban
Community (SC) District on 0.3 acre known as 3800
Windy Creek Drive. The Comprehensive Plan suggests
the property is appropriate for Residential
Neighborhood 4 use (4.0 units per acre or less). Tax
ID 767-689-1288.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
Jerry Turner stated he had no problem with the case.
5/27/2026 Page 69 of 95
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board approved Case 26SN2014, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. Non-Transferable Ownership. This conditional
use approval shall be granted to and for Shanika
Christmas, exclusively, and shall not be transferable
nor run with the land. (P)
2. Expansion of Use. There shall be no exterior
additions or alterations to the existing structure to
accommodate this use. (P)
3. Signage. There shall be no signs permitted to
identify this use. (P)
4. Number of Children. This conditional use
approval shall be limited to providing care,
protection, and guidance to a maximum of twelve (12)
children, other than the applicant’s own children, at
any one time. (P)
5. Days and Hours of Operation. Hours and days of
operation shall be limited to Monday through Friday
from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. There shall be no Saturday or
Sunday operation of this use. (P)
6. Pick-up and Drop-off. Pick-up and drop-off
shall be between the hours of 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. (P)
7. Time Limitation. This conditional use approval
shall be granted for a period not to exceed five (5)
years from the date of approval. (P)
8. Outdoor Play Areas. Any outdoor play area
and/or recreational equipment utilized by the family
day care home shall be limited to the existing deck
or shall be located in the side or rear yard of the
property. Outdoor play area and/or recreational
equipment areas, including such areas utilizing the
existing deck, shall have perimeter fencing of at
least four (4) feet in height, installed around the
equipment or play area. Equipment for outdoor play
areas shall be located no closer than ten (10) feet
to the side or rear property lines. (P)
9. Employees. No more than one (1) employee shall
be permitted to work on the premises, other than
family member employees that live on the premises. No
overnight care shall be provided by employees. (P)
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
I. 24SN1115 - Walton Station Rezoning and Adjustments —
Midlothian
5/27/2026 Page 70 of 95
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Walton Station
Rezoning and Adjustments is a request to rezone from
Suburban Community (SC), Agricultural (A) and
Neighborhood Business (NB) to Transition Residential
(TR) with adjustments to ordinance requirements for
development standards and amendment of zoning
district map known as 410 Coalfield Road. The 39.93
acre property is proposed for a maximum development
of 157 dwelling units. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Residential
Neighborhood 4 use (4.0 units per acre or less). Tax
IDs 727-704-9396; 727-705-1278, 1834, 6366, 6648,
7582, 8524, 8809; 727-706-5812 and 728-705-2101.
Case manager Harold Ellis introduced the case. He
stated the Planning Commission and staff recommended
denial.
Jeff Geiger, representing the applicant, provided
additional details about the case.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
Arielle Green expressed concerns relative to school
impacts, school overcrowding, and traffic impacts.
Brittany Hare spoke in opposition to the case, citing
concerns about traffic, student safety, and school
overcrowding.
Amber Rhodes spoke in opposition to the case, citing
inadequate school capacity at J.B. Watkins Elementary
School, which is a public safety issue.
Jeff Foster stated if the land is not going to be
used for a middle school, then it is the perfect
place for an age-restricted community.
Janet Lachowsky, one of the landowners in the case,
reviewed the history of how the landowners came
together, negotiations with the county, and signing
with developer Stanley Martin. She encouraged the
Board to either approve the case or buy the land.
Joseph Bishoff urged the Board to either allow the
project to proceed or negotiate with Stanley Martin
to get the contract so that the county can finally
proceed with the desperately needed project.
Jamie Galanti, representative for two-thirds of the
landowners, spoke in support of the project. He
stated that if the Board would not approve the case,
then the landowners would like to talk to the Board
about a school.
Patrick Riley, representative for the remaining
landowners, urged the Board to either approve the
case or let Stanley Martin assign the contract to the
county.
Ned Morris, one of the landowners, urged the Board to
either approve the case or take over the contract
from Stanley Martin.
5/27/2026 Page 71 of 95
Cindy Brown asked the Board to approve the case.
Brooke Selden spoke in support of growth.
Leanne McElderry stated she was present to talk about
data centers.
Dr. Miller clarified that this was a public hearing
about this particular development, and he encouraged
her to contact the clerk to the board to schedule a
time to speak.
Russell Wiles spoke in support of the 55-plus
community, stating the project would provide vital
housing options for aging residents.
Peggy Gilbert spoke in support of the case and stated
maybe the county could get together with Stanley
Martin and make a decision that would be great for
everyone.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
Questions and discussion ensued between Dr. Miller
and Deputy County Administrator Jesse Smith relative
to the offers made to the landowners, the amount of
acreage under consideration, the acreage needed for a
middle school, counteroffers made by the county, and
development in the area of the case over the last
seven years.
Dr. Miller then made a motion to deny Case 24SN1115,
but there was no second.
Mr. Ingle addressed comments made by both sides of
the case, including taxpayers paying for road
improvements, the parameters of age-restricted
housing and how it differs from age-targeted housing,
capacities of schools in the area and the associated
need for redistricting, and whether the case fully
complies with the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that
this is a really tough case.
Additional discussion ensued relative to land
requirements to build a new school and the right
place for a middle school.
Dr. Miller called for a second on his motion to deny
the case, but there was no second.
Dr. Hylton inquired if Dr. Miller would be open to a
90-day deferral, to which Dr. Miller agreed.
Mr. Carroll stated he understands both sides, but he
has to look at the merits of the case. He further
stated this was a close one for him, and if the
county is going to buy the land, then it needs to do
it, which solves the problems for both the people who
do not want the development and the sellers. He
stated that he does not want to oppose the chair, but
he would have trouble voting to deny the case. He
5/27/2026 Page 72 of 95
further stated deferral is an appropriate motion that
he would second.
Ms. Schneider stated deferring the case would not do
much good if Dr. Miller did not want to go forward
with this development.
Dr. Hylton stated that, as a part of a potential
sale, the county could ask the applicants to withdraw
the case.
Dr. Miller stated he had put out the possibility of
withdrawing the case, which was something that was
not considered because they wanted to bring the case
before the Board. He further stated that during the
deferral timeline, the landowners could give the
Board a number, and it could figure it out from
there. He stated he would like to see the situation
solved as much as everyone else. He further stated
the middle school on the property is no longer an
option, and the county is still looking into where it
may go, but there may be another county use for the
land subject to the Board identifying the funding to
do that. He then made a motion, seconded by Dr.
Hylton, for the Board to defer Case 24SN1115 to its
August 26, 2026, public hearing.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
J. 25SN1254 - Robious Road Rezoning and Adjustment -
Midlothian
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Robious Road
Rezoning and Adjustment is a request to rezone from
Agricultural (A) to Transition Residential (TR) with
adjustment to ordinance requirements for development
standards and amendment of zoning district map
fronting approximately 250 feet on the north side of
Robious Road, 375 feet east of Cranbeck Road. The
3.45 acre property is proposed for a maximum
development of 27 dwelling units. The Comprehensive
Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
Residential Neighborhood 8 use (8.0 units per acre or
less). Tax IDs 742-714-7407 and 9231.
Case Manager Rich Saunders introduced the case. He
stated the Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval, subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Brady Deal, representing the applicant, provided
additional details about the case.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Dr. Hylton, the
Board suspended its rules to consider items after 11
p.m.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
Dr. Miller called for public comment on Case
25SN1254.
5/27/2026 Page 73 of 95
Renae Eldred stated three-bedroom units would mean
three cars per unit, and she expressed concerns about
there being adequate parking.
Jerry Turner stated this project is better suited for
people 50 or older.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
Dr. Miller stated this is an ill-advised use of this
land, and he is unable to support the case.
Discussion ensued between Dr. Miller and Deputy
County Administrator Jesse Smith regarding the number
of apartments that are already zoned in that area.
Dr. Miller shared his concerns about there being a
high-injury network (HIN) near this case. He inquired
of Mr. Smith why parking and HIN concerns were not
addressed as the cases were coming through Planning.
Mr. Smith stated the Board worked hard to adjust some
of those parking standards through ZoMod, and he was
comfortable that there would be adequate parking for
these particular units. He further stated that, in
terms of the HIN, the Safe Streets for All program is
a tool the county has, and staff could begin taking a
harder look at future cases that are on a HIN if that
is the Board's desire. He cautioned that there are a
lot of roads on the HIN.
Additional discussion ensued relative to future
development plans for the Barclay.
Dr. Miller stated this place would be good for 55-
plus. He inquired of Mr. Deal if he would consider a
deferral and a discussion about 55-plus units.
Mr. Deal stated he thought they would be willing to
consider it. He further stated they were trying to
bring another diverse housing option currently
unavailable there. He addressed parking concerns. He
stated the property that was zoned for future
apartments is a forested, protected wetland, which is
why it has not been developed.
In response to Dr. Miller's question relative to the
land being undevelopable, Mr. Smith stated staff
would have to verify that.
Mr. Ingle stated there are a significant number of
parcels shown on the county website as available to
build on because they have been zoned, but are not
buildable. He further stated it would be unfair to
judge a property based on something that could never
be built close by. He stated he did not want to go
against Dr. Miller, but he did not know what the
legal justification would be to deny the case.
Dr. Miller read a statement outlining the legal
justification for denying the case.
5/27/2026 Page 74 of 95
Mr. Mincks confirmed that Dr. Miller's statement
would be a basis for denying the case.
Ms. Schneider stated she agreed with Mr. Ingle, and
this would be a great infill project.
In response to Mr. Ingle's question, Director of
Transportation Chessa Walker provided an explanation
of HIN roads.
Mr. Ingle encouraged Mr. Deal to take the deferral
and talk to Dr. Miller about something the Board
could pass. He stated Dr. Miller has provided a legal
reason to deny the case.
Mr. Deal stated the traffic volume would be the same
for this case or a senior living case.
Dr. Miller stated he had another idea that would be a
great use for the land that would solve the traffic
issue and a challenge in the county. He further
stated he would like to have that conversation with
the Board, and he would like Mr. Deal to be involved
with it.
Discussion ensued about the legality of approving an
age-restricted case instead of the current case, when
the public safety concern would exist in both cases.
Mr. Deal encouraged the Board to approve the case as
requested.
Dr. Miller stated another variable is the sale of the
mall, which is a block away. He then made a motion to
deny the case because the proposal is located on a
section of Robious Road that has been identified as
part of a high-injury network in the county, and
because the applicant requested an adjustment to the
minimum project size, reducing it from 5 acres down
to 3.45 acres.
Mr. Ingle seconded the motion.
Discussion ensued relative to a deferral of the case.
Dr. Miller withdrew his motion to deny the case, and
Mr. Ingle withdrew his second.
Dr. Miller then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Ingle,
for the Board to defer the case to its August 26,
2026, public hearing.
Dr. Hylton stated another option available to the
Board is a remand to the Planning Commission.
In response to Dr. Miller's question about the
Planning Department's lack of comfort with the case,
Mr. Smith agreed that it is a tough site to develop.
In response to Dr. Miller's question to the Board
about a remand, Mr. Carroll stated remanding the case
would put it back to square one, and depending on Dr.
5/27/2026 Page 75 of 95
Miller's proposal, it may not be something that Main
Street Homes is willing or able to do. He further
stated that what is more concerning is the parcel
across the street approved for apartments on land
that is considered to be wetlands. He stated he is
not sure what would be solved by remanding the case.
Ms. Schneider reiterated that this is a good use of
the infill, and it is a very well thought-through
process. She stated many working families need a
house but not all the amenities.
Dr. Miller then called for a vote on his motion,
seconded by Mr. Ingle, for the Board to defer Case
25SN1254 to its August 26, 2026, public hearing.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
K. 26SN2016 - Ramey Rezoning, Adjustments, and Accessory
Dwelling Unit - Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Ramey Rezoning,
Adjustments, and Accessory Dwelling Unit is a request
to rezone from Agricultural (A) to Agricultural (A)
with adjustments to ordinance requirements for
development standards plus conditional use to permit
an accessory dwelling unit (attached) and amendment
of zoning district map known as 12706 Bundle Road.
The 104.5 acre property is proposed for a maximum
development of four (4) dwelling units with an
accessory dwelling unit. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Rural
Residential/Agricultural use (0.2 units per acre or
less). Tax ID 740-642-8670.
Case manager Haley Gibson introduced the case. She
stated the Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval, but staff recommended denial.
The Rameys provided additional details about the
case.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
Jerry Turner expressed his support for the case.
Ian Richards-Karamarkovich expressed his support for
the case.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the
Board approved Case 26SN2016, subject to the
following conditions:
Proffered Conditions
Conditions 1-7 shall apply to the proposed subdivision of the Property:
1. Density. Any subdivision of the Property shall
not result in more than four (4) parcels and conform
5/27/2026 Page 76 of 95
to the requirements of the family subdivision process
as set forth in Chapter 17.1 of the Chesterfield
County Code. (P)
2. Road Frontage. Road frontage for each parcel in
the subdivision shall not be required. Access to each
parcel shall be provided by the requirements set
forth in these proffered conditions. (P)
3. Conceptual Plan. The subdivision of the
Property shall generally follow the conceptual plan
reflected in Exhibit A. The exact parameters of any
parcel created by the family subdivision process
shall be determined at time of plans review. (P)
4. License Agreement. Prior to the issuance of a
building permit for Parcels 1, 2, and 4 in the
subdivision, the Property owner shall provide a copy
of the approved license agreement with the County to
use the dedicated but unimproved County right-of-way
from Point A to Point B, as shown on Exhibit B. (P)
5. Access Easement. Prior to approval of a
building permit for Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4, the
property owner shall provide a copy of a recorded
instrument which will include the following:
a. A condition that shall require that no
structure or shall be constructed to block the
access.
b. A condition that shall require the
landowner of the subject property to be responsible
for maintenance of the access.
c. A minimum of a thirty (30) foot private
access easement from Point A to Point G, as shown on
Exhibit B.
d. Access to each parcel shall be as
follows:
i. Parcel 1 from Point A to Point G
ii. Parcel 2 from Point A to Point F
iii. Parcel 3 from Point A to Point
E
iv. Parcel 4 from Point A to Point
D. (P)
6. Roadway Design. A fifteen (15) foot wide
roadway shall be constructed and maintained to all
weather standards from Point A to Point B and a
twelve (12) foot wide roadway shall be constructed
and maintained to all weather standards from Point B
to Point G in accordance with the following
standards:
a. This roadway shall consist of not less
than the following: compacted soil sub-base with six
(6) inches of compacted 21-B crushed stone, if an
asphalt based surface is to be applied, it shall be
designed and constructed to Chesterfield County
subdivision street requirements or an equivalent
design approved by the subdivision team, capable of
supporting the projected 75,000 pound vehicle weight
5/27/2026 Page 77 of 95
and shall be maintained to this standard. The roadway
shall not be approved if it is rutted or potholed.
b. There shall be an additional three (3)
foot clear area beyond the edge of the roadway
c. There shall be a minimum vertical
clearance of fourteen (14) feet of area above the
roadway
d. The roadway shall have a maximum grade
of ten (1) percent with an appropriate transition at
the street connection.
e. The minimum inside turning radius for
any curve shall be twenty-seven (27) feet.
f. Any cross drains shall be designed to
accommodate a minimum ten (1) year storm. (P)
7. Roadway Inspection. Prior to issuing a
certificate of occupancy for the dwellings on Parcels
1, 2, and 4, the Planning Department shall inspect
this roadway to determine compliance as set forth
above. (P)
Conditions 8-10 shall apply to the existing accessory dwelling unit on Parcel 3.
8. Occupancy. Occupancy of the accessory dwelling
unit shall be limited to the occupants of the
principal dwelling unit, individuals related to them
by blood, marriage, adoption, or guardianship, foster
children, personal guests, or household employees.
(P)
9. Deed Restriction. For the purpose of providing
record notice, within thirty (30) days of zoning
approval, a deed restriction shall be recorded
setting forth the limitation in Condition 7. The deed
book and page number of this restriction and a copy
of the restriction as recorded shall be submitted to
the Planning Department. (P)
10. Accessory Dwelling Unit Location, Size and
Construction Limitations. The following limitations
shall apply to the accessory dwelling unit on the
Property:
a. The accessory dwelling unit shall be
located on the Property as generally depicted in
Exhibit A.
b. The accessory dwelling unit shall be
no larger than 1,050 square feet.
c. A manufactured home shall not be
permitted on this property. (P)
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
19. Public Hearings
A. To Consider Adoption of an Ordinance Establishing a
Local Animal Cruelty Registry
Major Michael Breeden introduced the public hearing.
Questions and discussion ensued relative to the
5/27/2026 Page 78 of 95
information provided.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
Renae Eldred spoke in support of the ordinance and
expressed hope that all local registries could be
linked together.
Ian Richards-Karamarkovich spoke in opposition to the
registry, citing American Society for the Prevention
of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) opposition to
registries like these because they have proven
ineffective, are costly, and are difficult to
maintain. He stated the registry is overreaching,
over-policing, and over-punishing people who have
already gone through the legal system and had justice
served against them.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
Additional discussion and questions ensued.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND
REENACTING SECTION 4-4 RELATIVE TO THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF A LOCAL ANIMAL CRUELTY REGISTRY
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section 4-4 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-
enacted, to read as follows:
Chapter 4
ANIMALS AND POULTRY
OOO Sec. 4-4. Local Animal Cruelty Registry
(a) This hereby establishes an animal cruelty
registry to provide public access to information
regarding persons convicted in the county on or after
January 1, 2009 of a felony violation of (i) cruelty
to animals as provided by § 3.2-6570; (ii) animal
fighting as provided by § 3.2-6571; (iii) maiming,
killing, or poisoning an animal as provided by §
18.2-144; or (iv) killing or injuring a police animal
as provided by § 18.2-144.1. Information on such
registry may include the name and address of the
offender at the time of conviction as well as the
offense for which the offender was convicted and the
date and place of conviction. Access to the registry
will be made publicly available on the Chesterfield
County website.
(b) A person listed on the registry, or their
immediate family member if the person is deceased,
5/27/2026 Page 79 of 95
may request removal from the registry by submitting a
form found on the registry website if one of the
following conditions are met:
(1) 15 years or more have passed since
the violation that warranted inclusion in the
registry, provided they have had no additional felony
convictions of an offense listed in subsection A.
(2) The conviction has been reversed
or pardoned.
(3) The person is deceased.
Animal Services supervision will then review the
request and determine whether removal from the
registry is appropriate. If Animal Services
supervision rejects the request, the person who made
the request may appeal the rejection in writing to
the Chief of Police within 10 business days from the
date of the rejection by submitting an appeal request
form on the registry website.
State Law Reference – Local animal cruelty
registries, Code of Virginia, § 3.2-6573.1.
OOO
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately after adoption.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
B. To Consider an Ordinance to Amend County Code Section
19.2 (Zoning Ordinance) Relative to Setbacks from
Electric Transmission Lines and Self Storage
Dr. Miller stated that the Board would like to defer
consideration of amendments relative to setbacks from
electric transmission lines for 30 days. He then
called for public comment on the deferral.
There being no one to speak to the deferral, the
public hearing on the deferral was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board deferred the consideration of amendments to
Chapter 19.2 (Zoning Ordinance) relative to setbacks
from electric transmission lines to its June 24,
2026, public hearing.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
Zoning Administrator Thomas Jenkins introduced the
public hearing to consider amendments to Chapter 19.2
(Zoning Ordinance) relative to self storage.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
Renae Eldred spoke in favor of the amendments and
asked if they could go a little bit further and put
5/27/2026 Page 80 of 95
some distance between self-storage facilities.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing to consider amendments to Chapter 19.2
(Zoning Ordinance) relative to self storage was
closed.
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Hylton,
the Board adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND
REENACTING SECTIONS 19.2-29 AND 19.2-30-49
RELATIVE TO USES, AND 19.2-72 RELATIVE TO
NONCONFORMITIES & RELATIONSHIP TO PRIOR ZONING
ORDINANCES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County:
(1) That Sections 19.2-29, 19.2-30-49, and 19.2-72 of
the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as
amended, are amended and re-enacted, to read as
follows:
Chapter 19.2
OOO ARTICLE 3 USES
OOO
19.2-29 Principal Use Matrix
Table 19.2-29.1 Principal Use Matrix
Note: P = Permitted By Right | R = Permitted with Restrictions | C = Conditional
C* = Conditional with Additional Guidance in Use Restrictions
S = Special Exception | blank cell = Not Permitted
Districts ->
Uses A RC SR SC SU TR UR AR NB MU CC EC EG WD
Employment and Industrial Services
Warehousing, Storage and Distribution
Self-Storage C* C*
Discarded Material Storage C
Distribution Center C C P
Fuel Storage and Distribution P C
Motor Vehicle Tow Lot C
Storage, Outside P
Warehouse C C C P
Wholesale Trade C P P
5/27/2026 Page 81 of 95
OOO
19.2-30-49 Self-Storage
A. Applicability. This Section applies to any
indoor self-storage use designated as
a conditional use with additional guidance in
the Principal Use Matrix (Sec. 19.2-29). [Note:
self-storage is designated as a conditional use
with additional guidance in the CC and WD
Districts.]
B. Building Access.
1. Storage units must be within an enclosed
building.
2. Access to all rental spaces must be from the
interior with a maximum of four exterior
loading/entry doors excluding any
office entrances.
C. Location.
1. Use shall not be located on a parcel that has
frontage on an arterial or collector road. 2. Use is not located within a VO District.
D. Exterior Automobile or Recreational Vehicle Storage. May be accessory to this use and
subject to the following:
1. Maintenance or repair does not occur;
2. Sales does not occur;
3. Use is screened from view of roads by:
a. Building layout;
b. Durable architectural walls or fences
constructed of comparable materials to, and
design compatible with, the warehouse
building(s); or
c. Berms or landforms that are part of the
natural terrain or integrated to appear as
though they are part of the natural
terrain; and
4. Use is screened from view of adjacent
Residential Districts, Commercial Districts,
EC Districts, or adjacent A property
designated in the Comprehensive Plan for
residential; Arterial Business; Office, Light
Production, and Assembly; or, Light Business
uses. Screening is accomplished by a compound
design where warehouse buildings block the
view of the area. Openings between buildings
are permitted to accommodate underground
utilities, fire code requirements, and unique
site constraints provided views through the
openings are screened through the use of
screening walls constructed of comparable
materials to, and design compatible with, the
warehouse building(s).
E. Use of Storage Space. Rental spaces must not be
used for any purpose other than storage. Sales
of goods and services, manufacturing, and other
non-storage uses are prohibited.
F. Hours of Operation. Hours shall be limited to 6
a.m. until 10 p.m.
5/27/2026 Page 82 of 95
G. Buffer Against Residentially Zoned Property. A
minimum 100 foot buffer shall be maintained
between the use and any adjacent residentially
zoned property or vacant Agricultural zoned
property shown in the Comprehensive Plan for
residential use.
H. Accessory Uses. Uses may include rental offices,
incidental sales or rental of moving supplies
and equipment, and living quarters for a
resident manager or security guard.
OOO
19.2-72 Development Under Prior Zoning Ordinances
E. Temporary Continuation of Uses for Former C-5, I-1, I-2, and I-3 Properties.
1. Until January 1, 2031, any use permitted by
right or with restrictions in the former C-5,
I-1, I-2, and I-3 districts designated in
Chapter 19.1 is permitted by right or with
restrictions, even if that use is not a
permitted use in the corresponding district
established in Chapter 19.2. The following uses
are not included:
a. automobile sales excluding consignment lot;
b. data center;
c. motor vehicle sales;
d. motor vehicle rental;
e. mini-storage/mini-warehouse facility;
f. truck rental;
2. The use permission established by Subsection 1
does not apply if the use is prohibited by a
condition of zoning.
3. The use permission established by Subsection 1
applies only to uses and not development
standards. All uses are subject to all
development standards of Chapter 19.2
4. Uses established by Subsection 1 shall be
considered conforming to this Chapter and are
not considered nonconforming until the
expiration of the five year period. Upon such
expiration, all established uses shall be
considered nonconforming and subject to the
restrictions applicable to nonconforming uses
in Article 6 and state law.
5. Conditional uses and applications for
conditional use for those projects not meeting
any requirement for a restricted use in Chapter
19.1 are not eligible for this continuation.
OOO
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately after adoption.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
C. To Consider FY2027-FY2032 Secondary Road Six-Year
Plan and FY2027 Secondary Road Improvement Budget;
Appropriation of Funds and Authorization to Proceed
5/27/2026 Page 83 of 95
Director of Transportation Chessa Walker introduced
the public hearing. She stated that Rebecca Worley,
VDOT Residency Engineer, was also present in the
audience.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
Mr. Carroll made a motion, seconded by Mr. Ingle, to
approve. He then stated he would like a new bridge at
Winterpock Creek.
Dr. Miller called for a vote on Mr. Carroll's motion,
seconded by Mr. Ingle, for the Board to approve the
FY2027-FY2032 Secondary Road Six-Year Plan and FY2027
Secondary Road Improvement Budget; appropriate
anticipated VDOT reimbursements for Bellwood Road
Turnaround ($25,000); River Road at Winterpock Creek
(Bridge Repair) ($500,000); and Courthouse Road at OB
Gates ES (Shoulder Paving) ($400,000); and
grant authorizations for the River Road at Winterpock
Creek (Bridge Repair) and Courthouse Road at OB Gates
ES (Shoulder Paving) projects as follows:
a. Authorize the County Administrator to enter
into permits, agreements, and contracts acceptable to
the County Attorney;
b. Authorize the County Administrator to proceed
with engineering, right-of-way acquisitions,
including the advertisement of eminent domain public
hearings, if necessary, and to accept the conveyance
of right-of-way and easements that are required;
c. Authorize the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and County Administrator to execute
easement agreements for the relocation of utilities;
and
d. Authorize the Procurement Director to proceed
with the advertisement of a construction contract.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
D. To Consider an Amendment to a Lease of County
Property Adjacent to the Meadowville Wastewater Pump
Station at 1398 Bermuda Hundred Road - Bermuda
Real Property Manager Lynn Snow introduced the public
hearing.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the
Board approved an amendment to a lease of county
property adjacent to the Meadowville Wastewater Pump
Station at 1398 Bermuda Hundred Road with American
Towers, LLC.
5/27/2026 Page 84 of 95
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
E. To Consider the Vacation of Land Dedicated as Part of
the Talley Family Subdivision - Matoaca District
Ms. Snow introduced the public hearing.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
Mr. Carroll made a motion, seconded by Mr. Ingle, to
approve. He then provided additional details about
the matter.
Dr. Miller called for a vote on Mr. Carroll's motion,
seconded by Mr. Ingle, for the Board to adopt the
following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE whereby the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA ("GRANTOR") vacates to ROBERT E. TALLEY and JERRY L. TALLEY
("GRANTEE") two 30’ strips of land dedicated
for road widening within Talley Family
Subdivision, Matoaca, Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown on a
plat thereof duly recorded in the Clerk's
Office, Circuit Court, Chesterfield County,
Virginia in Plat Book 330, at Page 36.
WHEREAS, ROBERT E. TALLEY and JERRY L. TALLEY
petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County, Virginia to vacate two 30’ strips of land
dedicated for road widening within Talley Family
Subdivision, Matoaca, Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia more particularly shown
on a plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court of said County in Plat Book 330, Page
36, by Virginia Surveys, dated September 13, 2024,
and revised November 14, 2024, December 11, 2024,
February 19, 2025, March 20, 2025, and June 5, 2025.
The 30’ strips petitioned to be vacated are more
fully described as follows:
30’ strips of land dedicated for road
widening within Talley Family Subdivision,
the locations of which are more fully shown
on a plat made by Virginia Surveys, dated
September 13, 2024, and revised November 14,
2024, December 11, 2024, February 19, 2025,
March 20, 2025, and June 5, 2025, a copy of
which is attached hereto and made a part of
this Ordinance.
WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section
15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended,
by advertising; and,
WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the
continuance of the 30’ strips sought to be vacated.
5/27/2026 Page 85 of 95
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
That pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid 30’ strips
be and are hereby vacated.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
accordance with Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, and a certified copy of
this Ordinance, together with the plat attached
hereto shall be recorded no sooner than thirty days
hereafter in the Clerk's Office, Circuit Court,
Chesterfield County, Virginia pursuant to Section
15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section
15.2-2274 is to destroy the force and effect of the
recording of the portion of the plat vacated. This
Ordinance shall vest fee simple title to the 30’
strips hereby vacated in the adjacent property owners
within Talley Family Subdivision, free and clear of
any rights of public use.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the
names of the GRANTORS and GRANTEE, or their
successors in title.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
20. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
Tom Watson addressed the Board relative to the
Shoosmith Landfill.
21. Closing Announcements
Mr. Ingle announced that May 28 is his wedding
anniversary, and he thanked his wife for her love and
support over the years.
22. Adjournment
A. Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of
the Board of Supervisors
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adjourned on May 28, 2026, at 12:16 a.m. to
its regularly scheduled Board of Supervisors meeting
on June 24, 2026, at 2 p.m. in Room 502 of the County
Administration Building.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
__________________________ ___________________________
Christopher M. “Matt” Harris Mark S. Miller
Acting County Administrator Chairman
5/27/2026 Page 86 of 95
Citizen Comments Received Through the Comment Portal May 27, 2026, Board of Supervisors Meeting
Comment Type
Comment Name District
Unscheduled
matter
As a resident of
Chesterfield County, I am
submitting the proposal
below ("The Chesterfield
Law Enforcement
Prioritization and
Financial Oversight Act")
to be officially entered
into the public record for
the Board's next Citizen
Comment Period on
Unscheduled Matters.
Please distribute this
proposed ordinance to all
members of the Board of
Supervisors prior to the
upcoming session, and
confirm receipt so I know
it has been properly logged
into the administrative
record. Proposed Ordinance: The Chesterfield Law Enforcement Prioritization and Financial Oversight Act WHEREAS, Virginia is a
Dillon Rule state, and
while the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors
recognizes the supremacy of
state law, the Board
retains exclusive and
absolute authority over the
appropriation of local
discretionary tax revenue;
and WHEREAS, the primary fiscal
responsibility of the Board
is to ensure local tax
dollars are prioritized for
local emergency response
and the mitigation of
violent crime within the
County, rather than funding
state-level administrative
enforcement; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the
Chesterfield County Board
of Supervisors enacts the
following financial
restrictions regarding the
enforcement of SB 749 and
HB 217: 1. Restriction of Discretionary Funds: No
locally generated,
discretionary county funds
Dylan
Morgan
Bermuda
5/27/2026 Page 87 of 95
Comment Type
Comment Name District
shall be appropriated,
utilized, or authorized to
fund overtime pay,
administrative overhead, or
localized joint-task-force
participation specifically
designed to enforce the
firearm and magazine
restrictions outlined in SB
749 and HB 217. 2. Mandatory Fiscal Reporting: To ensure
compliance with local
fiscal priorities, the
Chief of the Chesterfield
County Police Department is
hereby directed to submit a
quarterly itemized audit to
the Board of Supervisors
detailing any county man-
hours, equipment, or
resources expended in the
seizure of firearms or
enforcement actions solely
related to SB 749/HB 217
compliance. 3. Autonomy of Constitutional Officers: While this Board
acknowledges the
independent constitutional
authority of the
Commonwealth’s Attorney and
the County Sheriff, this
Board officially requests
that these officers
exercise their absolute
prosecutorial and
enforcement discretion to
prioritize actual violent
crime over the
administrative prosecution
of otherwise law-abiding
citizens under SB 749/HB
217.
Consider
FY2027-
FY2032
Secondary
Road Six-
Year Plan
and FY2027
Secondary
Road
Improvement
Budget;
Appropriati
on of Funds
and
Authorizati
Please consider also
consolidating the Robious
Road corridor into a single
secondary route
designation. Currently, the
segment from Powhatan
County to Huguenot Road
(Route 147) is designated
Route 711 while the portion
from Huguenot Road to
Midlothian Turnpike (Route
60) is designated Route
675. The separate
designations are a relic
from when Robious Road was
not continuous, and given
Will Weaver Midlothian
5/27/2026 Page 88 of 95
Comment Type
Comment Name District
on to
Proceed
that it has been for
decades, it should have a
single designation,
preferably just Route 711.
In addition, the portion of
Courthouse Road between
Iron Bridge Road and L.C.
Bird High School, currently
Route 2099, should be
redesignated an extension
of Route 604, especially
given the plans to extend
Courthouse Road to Salem
Church Road and remove the
dead end. The board should
also consider petitioning
VDOT to upgrade Courthouse
Road between Routes 60 and
288 to primary status as an
extension of Route 147.
25SN1254
(Deferred
from
04/22/2026)
- Robious
Road
Rezoning
and
Adjustment
I’ve lived in the
Midlothian area of
Chesterfield County for
over 37 years. I’m writing
to support the townhome
project proposed at 11230
Robious Road.
This stretch of Robious
Road has seen a lot of new
growth in recent years. The
area is changing, and this
empty lot feels like a
natural next step.
What stands out to me is
that this project will
actually improve traffic.
The applicant is extending
the existing westbound
left-turn lane at the busy
Mall Drive / Robious Road
intersection, an upgrade
that will help traffic flow
better and reduce backups.
VDOT and the County
Department of
Transportation have already
reviewed and approved the
plans.
We need more housing
choices here for young
families and working
people. This modest two-
story townhome project fits
the County’s plan for the
area and would help meet
that need.
The Planning Commission
voted unanimously in favor
and county staff supports
it too. This seems like
Dean Hester Midlothian
5/27/2026 Page 89 of 95
Comment Type
Comment Name District
sensible growth on land
that’s been sitting empty
for a long time.
Thank you.
Unscheduled
matter
I am writing to formally
express my grave concerns
regarding the proposed data
center 'Project Loch'
planned for development
less than 1/2 mile from an
elementary school and
daycare and less than 1
mile from my neighborhood I
respectfully urge the Board
to reconsider or pause this
project and future
consideration of such
projects until a more
thorough evaluation of its
community impact can be
completed. This includes
concerns about rezoning
parts of the western county
initially zoned as
residential or agricultural
to office and manufacturing
(ie data centers).
My concerns are grounded in
publicly available data and
the experiences of national
and other Virginia
localities that have
already faced the
consequences of large-scale
data center development.
My concerns include the
following:
* Severe Environmental
impact on water supply at
Swift Creek Reservoir for
all Chesterfield County
residents. Tomahawk Creek
empties directly into
county water supply.
Including, localized impact
on residents who rely on
well water within 1 mile of
data center site—this
impacts over 50 households
in the immediate vicinity.
* Increases in air
pollution, noise pollution
and light pollution from
generators, cooling
systems, and construction
Andrea Kade Midlothian
5/27/2026 Page 90 of 95
Comment Type
Comment Name District
activity and eventual long
term damaging effects from
the completion of a data
center.
* Significant energy and
water usage that may strain
local infrastructure,
including nearby medical
buildings, residential
housing, and schools or
daycare facilities.
Residents and Businesses
are already expected to
suffer hikes in energy and
utility usage, putting
undue financial strain on
all residents, but
excessively on low and
fixed income residents.
* Declines in property
values for nearby
homeowners
* Environmental impacts of
construction on wetlands,
stream channels, and
threatened and endangered
species
* Heightened negative
impact of water supply on
surrounding resident
households and businesses.
Most recently, news outlets
have reported nationally on
water pressure decreases
and polluted drinking water
from data center
construction and usage.
* Heat impact including
heat island effects; this
increase temperatures in
vicinity by 2-9 degrees on
average.
* Traffic increases during
both construction and
ongoing operations,
including heightened
congestion along Midlo
Turnpike that could lead to
more traffic accidents in
an area already prone to
high accident rate. Also
lead to degradation of 2-
lane roads seeing
significant erosion
Unscheduled
matter
Citizen left a voice mail
message expressing concerns
about data centers.
Kyle Davis unknown
Unscheduled
matter
Citizen left a voice mail
message expressing concerns
about data centers.
Christiana
Royalty
Clover
Hill
5/27/2026 Page 91 of 95
Comment Type
Comment Name District
Unscheduled
matter
Citizen left a voice mail
message expressing concerns
about data centers.
Kristen
Coffey
unknown
Unscheduled
matter
Citizen left a voice mail
message expressing concerns
about data centers.
Robin Ann
Gauthier
unknown
Unscheduled
matter
As a mother and business
owner in Chesterfield, I
would like to express my
concerns with the 2 data
centers being proposed in
Chesterfield. There is no
transparency as to where
this water usage will come
from, how much it will
take, and what other
expenses us as the tax
payers will incur. My
children live and play on
the swift creek reservoir
and I will take all
necessary steps to protect
it and their safety.
Cassie
Snyder
Clover
Hill
25SN1254
(Deferred
from
04/22/2026)
- Robious
Road
Rezoning
and
Adjustment
I am the property owner of
11230 and 11240 Robious
Road.
Six years ago, I lost my
husband and this property
was left to me as part of
his estate. Until my
parent’s death in 1965, I
lived on the adjacent six
acres, which The Barclay at
Midlothian is now built on.
In 1975, my husband and I
purchased 11230 and 11240
Robious Road where we
raised our daughter and
created countless family
memories.
After his passing, what was
once a cherished family
asset became a significant
burden to possess. Choosing
to sell this property is
not a decision I have made
lightly, and it has not
come without personal cost.
I have invested a
considerable portion of my
retirement savings on legal
and professional fees to
ensure this deal is
successful, and I did so
with confidence that all
the requirements for the
rezoning process had been
satisfied and received full
support from Chesterfield
County Staff and Planning
Commission. The stress of
Lucinda
Wingo
Midlothian
5/27/2026 Page 92 of 95
Comment Type
Comment Name District
managing this sale has been
challenging and we are
looking forward to its
conclusion.
As I drove to attend the
April 22nd Board of
Supervisors meeting, I was
reminiscing about my years
spent on Robious Road.
Having been a resident of
Chesterfield County for over
60 years and a former
teacher in Chesterfield
County Public Schools, I
have seen much growth in
our county. Specifically, as
related to my property on
Robious Road. There have
been many changes –
Belvedere Apartments,
Clairmont at Chesterfield
Apartments, Sunrise at Bon
Air and The Barclay at
Midlothian senior
facilities, Extra Space
Storage, KinderCare
Learning Center, and Aldi
Food Market to name a few.
I am excited to imagine all
the new families that will
create lasting memories on
our property at Robious
Road. The evolution of this
community will allow them
to enjoy the surrounding
conveniences and amenities.
I am thankful that a local
builder, with ties to the
community, will be
providing quality,
affordable housing that is
much needed and has brought
forth a project that aligns
with the comprehensive plan
and has full support from
Chesterfield County Staff
and Planning Commission.
I would greatly appreciate
the Board of Supervisors
approval of this case.
Unscheduled
matter
It is absolutely
devastating that the Board
would approve so much of
our precious land to a use
that will degrade
everything around it. Not
only the existing homes and
schools and stores which
seem to be of less concern,
but also to future
developments that would be
Katherine
Whitfield
Midlothian
5/27/2026 Page 93 of 95
Comment Type
Comment Name District
affected - NO ONE wants to
live near a data center,
let alone 3. It is
incredibly short-sighted to
approve the building of
facilities that will at
best only destroy our land
for a use that benefits no
one around it, and at worst
will increase our energy
bills, pollute and diminish
our water supply, and
provide a pleasant low-
grade hum to students all
day as they try to learn.
If you cannot think of your
existing constituents,
please think of the future
developments at least.
Whatever downside comes to
not moving this deal
forward is worth it to your
constituents, present and
future.
5/27/2026 Page 94 of 95
5/27/2026 Page 95 of 95