99SN0256-APR12.pdfApril 26, 2000 BS
STAFF'S
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
99SN0256
(AMENDED)
Sydney Ventures VI, Ltd.
Matoaca Magisterial District
Southwest quadrant of Hull Street and North Spring Run Roads
REOUEST: Rezoning from Agricultural (A) and General Business (C-5) to Community
Business (C-3).
PROPOSED LAND USE:
A retail shopping center with retail outparcels along Route 360 are planned.
However, with approval of this request, other C-3 uses would be permitted, except
as restricted by proffered conditions.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON
PAGES 2 THROUGH 6.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval subject to the applicant addressing transportation concerns. This
recommendation is made for the following reasons:
Providing a FIRST CHOICE Community Through Excellence in Public Service.
The proposed zoning and land uses conforms to the Upper Swift Creek Plan which
suggests the property is appropriate for a mixture of community-scale corporate
office and commercial uses and multi-family and townhouse residential uses with a
density of 8.0 to 14 units per acre.
The proposed zoning and land uses are representative of, and compatible with,
existing area commercial development.
The proffered conditions fail to insure adequate access spacing along North Spring
Run Road.
(NOTE: THE ONLY CONDITION THAT MAY BE IMPOSED IS A BUFFER CONDITION. THE
PROPERTY OWNER MAY PROFFER OTHER CONDITIONS. THE CONDITIONS NOTED
WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF AND THE COMMISSION.
CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY STAFF.
CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED
BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.)
PROFFERED CONDITIONS
This application contains two exhibits described as follows:
Exhibk A Plan tkled "Conceptual Road Improvements Plan" prepared by VHB, dated July 1, 1999
and last revised December 6, 1999. (P)
Exhibk B Elevation tkled "Render'rog of Proposed Hannaford Supermarket, Route 360 and North
Spr'mg Run Road" prepared by Hannaford Bros. Co., dated September 1999. (P)
(STAFF/CPC)
1. Utilkies. Public water and wastewater systems shall be used. (U)
(STAFF/CPC) 2.
Timber'mg. Except for the timber'mg approved by the Virginia State
Depamnent of Forestry for the purpose of removing dead or diseased
trees, there shall be no timbering on the Property until a land
disturbance permit has been obtained from the Environmental
Engineering Deparanent and the approved devices have been
installed. (EE)
(CPC)
3. Property Access. The Property access shall be controlled as follows:
Direct access from the Property to Route 360 shall be limited
to one (1) entrance/exit located approximately midway along
the Route 360 Property frontage as shown generally on
Exhibk A. Direct access from the Property to North Spring
Run Road shall be limited to two (2) entrances/exits, one (1)
located approximately midway along the North Spring Run
2 99SN0256/WP/APR26H
(STAFF/CPC)
Road Property frontage and the second located at the southern
Property line, all as shown generally on Exhibit A. Prior to
any f'mal site plan approval, the exact location of each of these
accesses shall be approved by the Transportation Department
and as further specified below.
If required by the Transportation Deparnnent, prior to site
plan approval, access easement(s) acceptable to the
Transportation Department shall be recorded across the
Property to provide shared use of these accesses with the
adjacent properties.
The Route 360 and northernmost North Spr'mg Run Road
accesses shall be designed and constructed as right-turn-in
and right-turn-out only.
The southern access on North Spr'mg Run Road shall be
designed and constructed to allow all turning movements.
Prior to the £mal approval of the first site plan, the
southermnost access may be relocated further south through
the adjacent property if such property is planned or zoned to
permit such access and the Developer has an agreement with
the adjacent landowner to permit such access on terms and
conditions acceptable to all parties referenced in paragraph
3.e. below.
Nothing in this proffer shall preclude a future relocation of
the southermnost full movement access to a location not more
than 400+ feet south; provided, however, the relocation and
its design is acceptable to the Developer, its successors or
assigns and its primary anchor tenant, and the necessary
improvements for such relocation, including, but not limited
to, land purchase, construction of a shared access road, turn
lanes from North Spr'mg Run Road, and the closure of the
original southernmost access (if required), are provided by
others and at no cost to the Developer, all as approved by the
Transportation Department. (T)
Dedications. Prior to any f'mal site plan approval, or within sixty (60)
days from a written request by the County, whichever occurs first, the
portions of the Property as necessary to provide the following rights-
of-way across the Property shall be dedicated, free and unrestricted,
to and for the benefit of Chesterfield County:
3 99SN0256/WP/APR26H
(STAFF/CPC)
Forty-five (45) feet of right-of-way, on the west side of North
Spr'mg Run Road measured from the centerline of that part of
North Spr'mg Run Road immediately adjacent to the Property,
and
One hundred (100) feet of right-of-way, on the south side of
Route 360 measured from the centerline of that part of Route
360 immediately adjacent to the Property. (T)
Transportation Improvements. To provide an adequate roadway
system, the Developer shall be responsible for the following road
improvements, all of which are generally shown and labeled on
Exhibit A. The exact design and dimensions of these improvements
shall be determined by the Transportation Department and subject to
Proffered Condition 3 above. If any road improvement described
herein is provided by others or determined by the Transportation
Depamnent to be unnecessary at the time of site plan approval, then
such road improvement shall be deemed satisfied:
Construction of additional pavement for a through lane along
the eastbound lanes of Route 360 for the entire Property
frontage;
Construction of additional pavement along the eastbound
lanes of Route 360 at the approved Route 360 Property access
and at the North Spring Run Road intersection to provide
separate right turn lanes;
Construction of addkional pavement and modification of the
existing median within the westbound lanes of Route 360 at
the North Spring Run Road/Route 360 intersection to provide
an extended left turn lane onto North Spring Run Road. The
exact length of this road improvement shall be approved by
the Transportation Department;
Construction of additional pavement along the southbound
lane of North Spring Run Road for the entire Property
frontage to provide a continuous right turn lane for the
approved Property accesses, together with any necessary
shoulder improvements;
Construction of a raised median within North Spring Run
Road from Route 360 to just south of the northernmost
Property access. The exact length of this road improvement
shall be approved by the Transportation Depart]nent;
4 99SN0256/WP/APR26H
(STAFF/CPC)
(STAFF/CPC)
(STAFF/CPC)
(STAFF/CPC)
Construction of additional pavement along North Spring Run
Road to provide a separate left turn lane from northbound
North Spr'mg Run Road into the Property at the southermnost
access;
Full cost for the installation of a traffic signal at the
intersection of Route 360 and North Spring Run Road, if
warranted, as determined by the Transportation Depamnent;
Full cost for the installation of a traffic signal at the
intersection of North Spr'mg Run Road and the southernmost
access, if warranted, as determined by the Transportation
Department; and
Dedication to Chesterfield County, free and unrestricted, of
any additional right-of-way (or easements) required for the
improvements identified above. (T)
Phasing Plan. Prior to any site plan approval, a phasing plan for the
required road improvements, as identified in Proffered Condition 5,
shall be submitted to and approved by the Transportation Depamnent.
(T)
Architecture. The buildings on the Property shall be compatible in
architectural style, colors and materials to the design shown on
Exhibit B. The majority of the material used on the Property's
primary building shall be a split-face CMU (or similar material) and
similar in color to the brick on the Swift Creek Baptist Church
located on North Spring Run Road on GPIN 724-669-9746. In
addition, other materials on the primary building shall be as follows:
the metal roof color shall be a patina green, the upper panels EIFS a
sandstone, respectively. (P)
Fencing. A white decorative rail fence shall be installed along
portions of the North Spr'mg Run Road frontage, wrapping around the
radius of the intersection of North Spring Run Road and Route 360;
and at the Property's secondary entrance adjacent to Lowe's, all as
generally shown on Exhibit A. The installation of the fence shall be
phased and installed as a part of the landscaping plan for that portion
of the Property adjacent to the areas noted for fencing. (P)
Storm Water Management. Any facilities required for water quality
or water quantity control located within the setbacks shall be
landscaped or otherwise improved so that the facilities become visual
enhancements to the uses developed on the Property. At the time of
5 99SN0256/WP/APR26H
site plan review, a plan depicting these requirements shall be
submitted to the Planning Depamnent for review and approval. (P &
EE)
(STAFF/CPC)
10.
Landscaping. At the time of site plan approval, a preference will be
given for the use of Southern Magnolias in areas of the Property
suitable for such species. Other flowering plant material such as
crepe myrtles should be dominant along the roadways if such species
are suitable for installation and are in keeping with appropriate
landscaping standards and the Zoning Ordinance requirements. These
landscaping requirements are not in addition to the required
landscaping for the Property. The Planning Deparnnent, at the time
of the review of the landscaping plan shall approve the appropriate
locations and species to be used to fulfill this proffer. (P)
(STAFF/CPC)
11.
Existing Structure(s). The existing structure(s), including the
building used for the car dealership and the billboard signs, located
along Route 360 shall be demolished prior to or in conjunction with
the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the Property. (P)
(STAFF/CPC)
12.
Use Limitations. The following uses shall not be permitted on the
Property:
Cocktail lounges and nightclubs
Indoor flea markets
Material reclamation receiving centers
Outside public ad&ess systems
Veterinary hospital and/or commercial kennels
Warehouses (P)
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location:
South line of Hull Street Road, west line of North Spr'mg Run Road and located in the southwest
qua&ant of the intersection of these roads. Tax ID 725-671-3757 and 724-671-9228 (Sheet 15).
6 99SN0256/WP/APR26H
Existing Zoning:
C-5 and A
Size:
13.2 acres
Existing Land Use:
Single family residential and convenience store
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use:
North - C-2 and A; Vacant, but under construction for commercial uses
South - A; Single family residential
East - C-2 and 0-2 with Conditional Use Planned Development; Commercial or vacant
West - C-5; Commercial or vacant
UTILITIES
Public Water System:
There is an existing twenty-four (24) inch water line extending along the north side of Hull Street
Road, adjacent to the request site. In addition, there is an existing twenty-four (24) inch water
line extending along the east side of North Spring Run Road, adjacent to the request site.
Preliminary investigations of the water pressure in this area indicate that static pressures may be
low for elevations above 287 feet. The applicant's engineer needs to further evaluate whether
(individual) booster pump(s) are needed to provide the desired level of water pressure to meet
the domestic needs of the development.
The applicant has proffered the use of public water. (Proffered Condkion 1)
Public Wastewater System:
There is an existing eight (8) inch wastewater collector serving the adjacent Lowe's site
and ending adjacent to the western property line of the request site. In addition, there is an
existing eight (8) inch wastewater collector approximately 200 feet east of North SpfingRunRoa&
The applicant has proffered the use of public wastewater. (Proffered Condition 1)
7 99SN0256/WP/APR26H
ENVIRONMENTAL
Drainage and Erosion:
The majority of the property drains toward Route 360 and then via a small tributary directly into
Swift Creek Reservoir between Lakepointe and Southshore Subdivisions which are located to
the north of the request ske. A small portion of the property in the southwest comer appears to
drain to the west, but still enters Swift Creek Reservoir. There are currently no known on-ske
drainage or erosion problems and, at this time, the natural watercourse between Route 360 and
Swift Creek Reservoir appears to be very stable.
The applicant has proffered that no timbering of the property will occur except within the
preview of a land disturbance permit. This will insure that adequate erosion control measures
are in place prior to timber'mg. (Proffered Condition 2)
Water Quality:
Development must conform to the Upper Swift Creek standards for water quality.
All SWM/BMP facilities should be designed as visual enhancements to the project. (Proffered
Condition 9)
PUBLIC FACILITIES
Fire Service:
This property is currently served by the Clover Hill Fire/Rescue Station, Company Number 7 and
Manchester Rescue Squad. When the property is developed, the number of hydrants and quantity
of water needed for fire protection will be evaluated during the plans review process. Also, the
need for ingress/egress for emergency equipment will be determined during the review of the
aforementioned plans.
Transportation:
This request will not limit development to a specific land use; therefore, k is difficuk to
anticipate traffic generation. Based on shopping center trip rates, development could generate
approximately 8,150 average daily trips. These vehicles will be distributed along Hull Street
Road (Route 360) which had a 1997 traffic count of 37,875 vehicles per day, and along North
Spr'mg Run Road which had a 1998 traffic count of 6,049 vehicles per day.
The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Six Year Improvement Program includes
a project to widen Route 360 to six (6) lanes from Swift Creek to Winterpock Road. Design for
this improvement is just underway. No construction funds are currently provided by VDOT for
this project.
8 99SN0256/WP/APR26H
The Thoroughfare Plan identifies Route 360 as a major arterial with a recommended right of
way width of 120 to 200 feet, and North Spr'mg Run Road as a major arterial with a
recommended right of way width of ninety (90) feet. The applicant has proffered to dedicate 100
feet of right of way, measured from the centerline of Route 360, and forty-five (45) feet of right
of way, measured from the centerline of North Spring Run Road, in accordance with that Plan.
(Proffered Condition 4)
Development must adhere to the Development Standards Manual in the Zoning Ordinance
relative to access and internal circulation (Division 5). Access to major arterials, such as Route
360 and North Spr'mg Run Road, should be controlled. The applicant has proffered that direct
access to Route 360 will be limited to one (1) entrance/exit, located approximately midway of
the property frontage, and direct access to North Spr'mg Run Road will be limited to two (2)
entrances/exits. The northermnost North Spr'mg Run Road access would be located
approximately midway of the property frontage and the southernmost access would be located
at the southern property line (Proffered Condition 3). As proffered, both the Route 360 access
and the northermnost North Spr'mg Run Road access would allow right turn-in and right turn-out
turning movements only, while the southernmost North Spring Run Road access would allow
all turning movements.
Staff does not support the applicant's proffer regarding access to North Spring Run Road
(Proffered Condition 3). The proffer would allow two (2) direct accesses to North Spring Run
Road. Staff supports only one (1) direct access from the property to North Spr'mg Run Road,
limited to right turn-in and right turn-out only. Attached is staff s recommended access plan for
North Spr'mg Run Road. The distance between Route 360 and McEnnally Road is approximately
2,300 feet. When North Spr'mg Run Road is improved to a four-lane divided roadway, only one
(1) crossover should be provided between these two (2) roadways. The crossover should be at
a location that: 1) serves multiple adjacent properties; and 2) provides adequate spacing for
traffic signalization. The crossover should be located approximately midway between Route 360
and McEnnally Road.
The North Spr'mg Run Road/Route 360 intersection and the McEnnally Road/North Spring Run
Road intersection are anticipated to warrant traffic signalization. The full access that the
applicant has proffered onto North Spr'mg Run Road located at the southern property line is also
anticipated to warrant traffic signalization. The separation between Route 360 and the proffered
full access location (approximately 850 feet) is not adequate. In order to provide acceptable
traffic signal spacing, full access to North Spr'mg Run Road for the property should be provided
through the adjacent property to the south. The proffered condition would allow the
southernmost access to be relocated onto the adjacent property, only if the developer agrees to
such relocation.
In addkion, staff recommends that spacing for unsignalized access onto major arterials, such as
North Spring Run Road, should be approximately 500 feet. By locating a full access at the
southern property line, the developer's proffer reduces the access spacing for the northermnost
unsignalized access to less than the standard spacing. Staff does not support the proffer
regarding access to North Spr'mg Run Road.
9 99SN0256/WP/APR26H
Providing interconnecting driveways between developments in this area allows travel between
sites without necessitating travel on Route 360, Winterpock Road or North Spring Run Road.
Accesses to the property should be shared with adjacent properties to the west and south. The
applicant has proffered to provide an access easement across the subject property to allow shared
use of the accesses. (Proffered Condition 3(b))
Mkigating road improvements must be provided to address the traffic impact of this
development. The applicant has proffered to: 1) construct an addkional lane of pavement along
Route 360 for the entire property frontage; 2) construct additional pavement along Route 360 at
the approved access and at North Spr'mg Run Road to provide separate right turn lanes; 3)
construct addkional pavement along the westbound lanes of Route 360 at the North Spring Run
Road intersection to provide an adequate left turn lane; 4) construct addkional pavement along
North Spr'mg Run Road along the entire property frontage to provide a continuous right turn lane
to serve each North Spring Run Road access; 5) construct additional pavement along North
Spring Run Road at the southermnost access to provide a left turn lane; 6) construct a raised
median along North Spring Run Road from Route 360 to south of the northernmost approved
access; and 7) full cost of a traffic signal at the Route 360/North Spr'mg Run Road intersection,
and the southermnost access/North Spr'mg Run Road intersection, if warranted. (Proffered
Condkion 5)
As noted above, staff cannot support access from the property onto North Spring Run Road as
proffered. Unless the proffer is amended, the Transportation Deparunent cannot support this
request.
LAND USE
Comprehensive Plan:
Lies within the boundaries of the Upper Swift Creek Plan which suggests the property is
appropriate for a mixture of community-scale corporate office and commercial uses and multi-
family and townhouse residential uses with a density of 8.0 to 14 units per acre.
One of the goals of this Plan is to provide for nodes of commercial services and supporting uses
in strategic locations at major road intersections such as Hull Street and North Spring Run
Roads. These community mixed use nodes would preclude the typical strip commercial
development along Route 360 by concentrating the most intense land uses at the core of these
road intersections with less intense land uses along the periphery as a transition to adjacent
development. This concentration of commercial uses at selected intersections promotes roadway
access control, visual interest and optimal utilization of the land.
10 99SN0256/WP/APR26H
Area Development Trends:
The majority of the area properties to the north, east and west of the subject property are zoned
commercial and are developed for moderate to large scale retail uses. Property to the south is
zoned agricukural and contains a single family dwelling. The Upper Swift Creek Plan suggests
that this area is appropriate for a mixture of communky-scale corporate office and commercial
uses and muki-family anti townhouse residential uses wkhin a communky mixed use node.
Site Design:
The request property lies within an Emerging Growth Area. Development must conform to the
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance which address access, parking, landscaping, architectural
trea1~nent, setbacks, signs, buffers, utilities, and screening of dumpsters and loading areas.
Uses~
In response to requests by area ckizens, the applicant has proffered that six (6) uses, permkted
by right or with restrictions in the Community Business (C-3) District, will not be developed on
the site. (Proffered Condition 12)
Architectural Treatment:
Architectural trea1~nent of buildings, including materials, color and style, must be compatible
with buildings located within the same project. Compatibility may be achieved through the use
of similar building massing, materials, scale, colors and other architectural features.
Within Emerging Growth Areas, no building exterior which would be visible to any A, R, R-TH,
R-MF or O District or any public right of way may consist of architectural materials inferior in
quality, appearance, or detail to any other exterior of the same building. There is, however,
nothing to preclude the use of different materials on different building exteriors, but rather, the
use of inferior materials on sides which face adjoining property. No portion of a building
constructed of unadorned concrete block or corrugated and/or sheet metal may be visible from
any adjoining A, R, R-TH, R-MF or O District or any public right of way. No building exterior
may be constructed of unpainted concrete block or corrugated and/or sheet metal.
In addition to these requirements, the applicant has submitted a proffered condition requir'mg that
buildings be compatible with the attached elevation. This elevation depicts a one-story structure
constructed of split face concrete block brick in color, with upper panels of drivit, sandstone in
color, and a patina green metal roof. (Proffered Condition 7)
All junction and accessory boxes must be minimized from view of adjacent property and public
rights of way by landscaping or architectural treatment integrated with the building served.
Mechanical equipment, whether ground-level or rooftop, must be screened from view of adjacent
property and public rights of way and designed to be perceived as an integral part of the building.
11 99SN0256/WP/APR26H
Buffers & Screening:
The Zoning Ordinance requires that solid waste storage areas (i.e., dumpsters, garbage cans, trash
compactors, etc.) be screened from view of adjacent property and public rights of way by a solid
fence, wall, dense evergreen plantings or architectural feature and that such area within 1,000
feet of any residentially zoned property or property used for residential purposes not be serviced
between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.
Sites must be designed and buildings oriented so that loading areas are screened from any
property where loading areas are prohibited and from public rights of way.
With the approval of this request, outside storage would be permitted as a restricted use. Outside
storage areas must be screened from view of adjacent properties on which such uses are not
permitted and from public rights of way.
Adjacent property to the south is zoned Agricultural (A) and is occupied by a single family
residence. The Upper Swift Creek Plan designates this property for community mixed use which
could include various types of residential densities. As an improved Agricultural (A) property,
the Zoning Ordinance does not require a buffer along the southern property boundary of the
request site. However, a zoning application is pending on the adjacent property to the south for
a mixed development to include office, commercial and townhouse uses (00SN0147). The
applicant for this adjacent zoning case has recently amended the application to preclude
residential development within the tract that abuts the subject property. However, this zoning
request includes the ability to adjust tract boundaries; therefore, the potential exists that should
the boundaries of the residential tract be adjusted, such development may abut the subject
property. At the time of site plan review, it will be determined whether a buffer is required based
upon what has been zoned on the adjacent property.
Fencing and Landscaping:
In addkion to the landscaping requirements set forth in the Zoning Ordinance, at the request of
area ckizens, the applicant has proffered the installation of a decorative rail fence along portions
of North Spr'mg Run Road, around the radius of the intersection of North Spring Run Road and
Route 360 and at the property's secondary entrance adjacent to Lowe's (Proffered Condition 8).
Further, as part of the required landscaping plan, preference will be given to the use of southern
magnolias in sukable areas of the property as well as other rower'rog plant material along
roadways. (Proffered Condition 10)
Existing Structures:
The existing structures located along route 360, to include the car dealership building and the
billboard signs, will be removed from the property prior to, or in conjunction with, the issuance
of the first certificate of occupancy for the project. (Proffered Condition 11)
CONCLUSIONS
12 99SN0256/WP/APR26H
The proposed zoning and land use conform to the Upper Swift Creek Plan which suggests the
property is appropriate for a mixture of community-scale corporate office and commercial uses and
multi-family and townhouse residential uses with a density of 8.0 to 14 units per acre. The proposed
zoning and land uses are representative of existing and anticipated development at selected major
road intersections within the Plan, where commercial services and supporting uses are encouraged
to locate. In addition, the applicant has proffered conditions that, in part, address landscaping,
removal of existing site structures, architecture and transportation improvements.
However, as noted herein, these proffered conditions do not address the Transportation Department's
concerns relative to site access from North Spr'mg Run Road, as discussed in the Transportation
section of this "Request Analysis". Therefore, staff's support of this request is contingent upon the
applicant addressing these concerns to the satisfaction of the Transportation Deparnnent.
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (5/18/99):
At the request of the applicant, the Commission deferred this case to August 17, 1999.
Staff (5/19/99):
The applicant was advised in writing that any significant new or revised information should be
submitted no later than June 14, 1999 for consideration at the Commission's August public
hear'rog. Also, the applicant was advised that a $150.00 deferral fee must be paid prior to the
Commission's public hear'rog.
Applicant (7/29/99):
The applicant submitted proffered conditions.
Applicant (7/30/99):
To date, the applicant has not paid the $150.00 deferral fee.
Applicant (8/4/99):
The applicant submitted revised proffered conditions as a result of discussions with staff.
13 99SN0256/WP/APR26H
Applicant, Area Residents, Staff and Matoaca and Clover Hill Commissioners (8/11/99):
A meeting was held to discuss area residents' concerns.
Applicant (8/17/99):
The applicant paid the deferral fee.
Planning Commission Meeting (8/17/99):
The Commission, on their own motion, deferred this case to October 19, 1999. The purpose of
the deferral was to allow the applicant to address concerns stated herein as well as meet with area
property owners.
Staff (8/18/99):
The applicant was advised in writing that any significant new or revised information should be
submitted no later than August 23, 1999, for consideration at the October public hearing.
Staff (9/30/99):
A meeting has been scheduled with area property owners on October 7, 1999.
Applicant, Area Residents, Staff and Clover Hill Commissioner (10/7/99):
A meeting was held to discuss area residents' concerns. Concerns from citizens were expressed
relative to lighting, existing land uses (car dealership and billboards), architectural and road
improvements.
The applicant indicated that proffered conditions would be forthcoming to address architecture,
BMP ponds as amenities, tree preservation, landscaping, lighting and removal of the existing
business (car dealership) and billboards.
Planning Commission Meeting (10/19/99):
The applicant requested a deferral to the Commission's December 13, 1999, public hearing.
Staff ( 10/20/99):
14 99SN0256/WP/APR26H
The applicant was advised in writing that any significant new or revised information should be
submitted no later than October 25, 1999, for consideration at the Commission's December
public hearing. The applicant was also advised that a $150.00 deferral fee was due.
Applicant (11/1/99):
The $150.00 deferral fee was paid.
Staff (11/21/99):
To date, no new information has been submitted.
Applicant (12/9/99):
Revised proffered conditions were submitted.
Applicant (12/10/99):
Revised proffered conditions were submitted.
Planning Commission Meeting (12/13/99):
The Commission, on their own motion, deferred this case to January 18, 2000. The purpose of
the deferral was to allow staff time to review the revised proffered conditions and to allow the
applicant an opportunity to address any concerns that staff might have.
Staff (12/14/99):
The applicant was advised in writing that any significant, new or revised information should be
submitted no later than December 20, 1999, for consideration at the Commission's January
public hearing.
Applicant (12/30/99):
Revised proffered conditions, as discussed herein, were submitted.
Applicant (1/12/00):
15 99SN0256/WP/APR26H
Revised proffered conditions, as discussed herein, were submitted.
Planning Commission Meeting (1/18/00):
The applicant accepted the Planning Commission's recommendation. Concern was expressed
from an adjoining property owner to the south relative to required buffers between the two
properties. In response to a question from Mr. Marsh, staff indicated that based upon a pending
zoning application on property to the south, the potential exists for residential development to
adjoin the subject property. Given this potential, a buffer will be required unless the adjacent
tract is committed for non-residential development.
Mr. Marsh noted that although transportation issues exist relative to access on North Spr'mg Run
Road, the applicant and the adjoining property owner to the south should work towards the
mutual benefit of a shared entrance to both sites, as referenced in the applicant's proffered
conditions.
On motion of Mr. Marsh, seconded by Mr. Cunningham, the Commission recommended
approval of this request and acceptance of the proffered condkions on pages 2 through 6.
AYES: Unanimous.
Board of Supervisors' Meeting (1/26/00):
Due to inclement weather, the Board deferred this case to February 9, 2000.
16 99SN0256/WP/APR26H
Board of Supervisors' Meeting (2/9/00):
At the request of the applicant, the Board deferred this case to April 12, 2000. The purpose of
this deferral was to allow the applicant to address access concerns along North Spr'mg Run Road,
as stated herein, and coordinate access issues with the adjacent property owner to the south.
Staff (2/14/00):
The applicant was advised in writing that any significant, new or revised information should be
submitted no later than February 23, 2000, for consideration at the April public hearing.
The applicant was also advised that a $150.00 deferral fee was due.
Applicant (2/28/00):
The $150.00 deferral fee was paid.
Staff(3/24/00):
To date, no new information has been received. The zoning case which is pending on the
adjacent property to the south is scheduled for the Planning Commission's consideration on April
24, 2000.
Board of Supervisors' Meeting (4/12/00):
The Board, on their own motion, deferred this case to April 26, 2000.
The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday, April 26, 2000, beginning at 7:00 p.m., will take under
consideration this request.
17 99SN0256/WP/APR26H
'HSHORE
£-?
CI
HILL HS;
HULL
-6;
.ER RID(
:HI
99SNO256(AMENDED)~
REZ: C-5 8~ A TO
SH. 15
N
Exhibit A
Recommended Access Plan
Spring Run Road
HULL STREET
t :: C,=se:~r~gSN0256: ::
Full Access - Crossover; Potential Traffic Signal
Partial Access - Right-in/Right-out
Raised Median
N