2026-06-24 Minutes BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES JUNE 24, 2026
6/24/2026 Page 1 of 98
2 p.m. Work Session - Administration Building, Room 502
A video recording of this meeting may be viewed at
https://www.chesterfield.gov/244/Agendas-and-Minutes.
Supervisors in Attendance:
Dr. Mark S. Miller, Chair
Mr. Kevin P. Carroll, Vice Chair
Mr. James A. Ingle, Jr.
Ms. Jessica L. Schneider
Dr. LeQuan M. Hylton
Dr. Joseph P. Casey
County Administrator
Dr. Miller called the meeting to order at 2 p.m.
1. Approval of Minutes
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board approved the minutes of the May 27, 2026,
and June 22, 2026, Board of Supervisors meetings, as
submitted.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
2. Requests to Postpone Agenda Items and Additions, Deletions or Changes in the Order of Presentation
There were no requests to postpone agenda items and
additions, deletions or changes in the order of
presentation.
3. Recognition of Retirees and Special Guests
Director of Constituent and Media Services David
Goode welcomed retirees Janice Herron (General
Services) and Battalion Chief Charles Knowles (Fire
and Emergency Medical Services). He also welcomed Art
Aylward and Kim Aylward, husband and daughter of the
late Karen Aylward (Economic Development), who were
present to receive Ms. Aylward's posthumously adopted
retirement resolution.
Board members thanked Ms. Herron, Battalion Chief
Knowles, and the Aylward family for the many years of
dedicated service provided to the county.
Mr. Goode provided details of additional retirees
receiving resolutions on the Board's consent agenda.
4. Everyday Excellence - Parks and Recreation
Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation Marlie
Smith introduced the members of the Special Events
Team: Vicki Kiger, Chris Duball, Matthew Hares,
Morgan Floyd, and Ryan VanderKlok. She provided
details of the many polished, welcoming experiences
they have coordinated in every corner of the county.
6/24/2026 Page 2 of 98
She stated the most recent ribbon cuttings (Roxshire,
Cogbill, and The Park) demonstrated the team's
ability to navigate different venues, audiences,
themes, and logistical needs with professionalism and
intention. She further stated the team's collective
work is operationally excellent, relationship-driven,
and community focused, and it reflects the high
standards set as a department and a county. She
congratulated and thanked them for an amazing year.
Board members expressed appreciation for the team and
thanked them for bringing quality experiences and
enjoyment to the residents of the county.
5. Work Sessions
A. Parks and Recreation Annual Update
Director of Parks and Recreation Neil Luther and Ms.
Smith provided the Board with an annual update on the
activities, initiatives, and future projects of the
Parks and Recreation department.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided during the presentation.
B. Adult and Juvenile Probation Services Update
Deputy County Administrator James Worsley introduced
the presenters for the work session, who were
Commonwealth's Attorney Erin Barr; Director of Court
Services Unit William Stanley; Director of Juvenile
Justice Services Michelle Smith; Director of
Community Corrections Services Gary Hughes; and
Treatment Courts Administrator Sahib Brown. Each
presenter provided the Board with an update on their
respective department's collaborative role in the
provision of adult and juvenile probation services.
Discussion and questions ensued relative to the
information provided during the presentation.
C. Finance Update
Deputy County Administrator Matt Harris and Director
of Budget and Management Gerard Durkin provided the
Board with updates on the upcoming bond sale and
FY2026 year-end.
Director of Intergovernmental Relations Natalie
Spillman and Legislative Affairs Liaison Casey Walker
provided the Board with an update on the state
budget, including state funding to support response
and remediation activities at Shoosmith Landfill.
Mr. Harris provided an update on the Sawmill Station
Community Development Authority (CDA) and future
public hearings related to FY2027 adopted budget
items (Business, Professional and Occupational
License (BPOL) tax exemption and Tax Relief for
Elderly, Disabled and Veterans Program
modifications). He announced that, for the fifth
consecutive year, Budget and Accounting received the
Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Triple
6/24/2026 Page 3 of 98
Crown Award, which recognizes governments that have
received GFOA's Certificate of Achievement for
Excellence in Financial Reporting, Popular Annual
Financial Reporting Award, and Distinguished Budget
Presentation Award in the same fiscal year.
D. 2026 General Assembly Legislation
County Attorney Jeff Mincks provided the Board with
an update on 2026 General Assembly legislation
affecting the county.
The Board concurred with the recommendations outlined
in Attachment B of the agenda item entitled "Staff
Recommendations Summary Sheet".
E. Consent Agenda Highlights
Deputy County Administrator Jesse Smith provided
details of various agenda items on the evening's
consent agenda.
F. Other Informational Highlights
• Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation Marlie
Smith received the Quiet Power Award at the Women in
Parks and Recreation Leadership Summit.
• Deputy County Administrator James Worsley was
elected to serve a two-year term on the Virginia
Local Government Management Association (VLGMA)
Executive Board.
• Henry Coleman was recognized for being selected to
be County Administrator for a Day.
6. Reports
A. Reports on the Status of District Improvement
Operating and Capital Funds, General Fund Unassigned
Balance and Debt Policy Ratios, and Investments
The Board approved the Reports on the Status of
District Improvement Operating and Capital Funds,
General Fund Unassigned Balance and Debt Policy
Ratios, and Investments.
7. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
Justin Goodman addressed the Board relative to his
concerns about high voltage transmission lines at
River City Sportsplex and Shoosmith Landfill.
Rachel Rosato addressed the Board relative to her
concerns about data centers in the county.
Caroline DeFelice addressed the Board relative to her
concerns about data centers in the county.
8. Closed Session
A. 1) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(3), Code of Virginia,
1950, as Amended, to Discuss the Acquisition by the
County of Real Estate for a Public Purpose, or the
Disposition of Publicly Held Real Property, Where
6/24/2026 Page 4 of 98
Discussion in an Open Meeting Would Adversely Affect
The Bargaining Position and Negotiating Strategy of
the Public Body, and 2) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(6),
Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss or
Consider the Investment of Public Funds Where
Competition or Bargaining is Involved, Where, if Made
Public Initially, the Financial Interest of the
Governmental Unit Would be Adversely Affected and
Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(39), Code of Virginia,
1950, as Amended, to Discuss or Consider Information
Subject to the Exclusion in Subdivision 3 of § 2.2-
3705.6 Related to Economic Development
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board went into Closed Session 1) Pursuant to §
2.2-3711(A)(3), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended,
to Discuss the Acquisition by the County of Real
Estate for a Public Purpose, or the Disposition of
Publicly Held Real Property, Where Discussion in an
Open Meeting Would Adversely Affect The Bargaining
Position and Negotiating Strategy of the Public Body,
and 2) Pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(6), Code of
Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss or Consider
the Investment of Public Funds Where Competition or
Bargaining is Involved, Where, if Made Public
Initially, the Financial Interest of the Governmental
Unit Would be Adversely Affected and Pursuant to §
2.2-3711(A)(39), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended,
to Discuss or Consider Information Subject to the
Exclusion in Subdivision 3 of § 2.2-3705.6 Related to
Economic Development.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
Reconvening:
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Miller,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day
adjourned into Closed Session in accordance with a
formal vote of the Board and in accordance with the
provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information
Act; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act
effective July 1, 1989 provides for certification
that such Closed Session was conducted in conformity
with law.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Board of
Supervisors does hereby certify that to the best of
each member’s knowledge, i) only public business
matters lawfully exempted from open meeting
requirements under the Freedom of Information Act
were discussed in Closed Session to which this
certification applies, and ii) only such business
matters were identified in the motion by which the
Closed Session was convened were heard, discussed or
considered by the Board. No member dissents from this
certification.
6/24/2026 Page 5 of 98
Mr. Ingle: Aye.
Ms. Schneider: Aye.
Dr. Hylton: Aye.
Mr. Carroll: Aye.
Dr. Miller: Aye.
9. Recess for Dinner
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board recessed for dinner in Room 502.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
6 p.m. Evening Session - Public Meeting Room, 10001 Iron Bridge Road
Reconvening:
10. Invocation by the Honorable Jessica L. Schneider, Clover Hill District Supervisor
The Honorable Jessica L. Schneider, Clover Hill
District Supervisor, gave the invocation.
11. Pledge of Allegiance Led by Matt Harris, Deputy County Administrator
Deputy County Administrator Matt Harris led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
12. County Administration Update
Dr. Casey announced that Steve Donohoe has been
promoted to director of the Department of Planning.
13. Board Member Reports
Board members announced and provided details of
several community meetings and county-related events
they attended recently.
14. Resolutions and Special Recognitions
A. Resolution Recognizing 2026 Senior Volunteer Hall of
Fame Inductees
Aging and Disability Manager Kimberly Graves
introduced John Hilliard, Jr., David Lipp, and Edith
Lumpkin, who were present to receive the recognition.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, volunteering is a powerful force for the
solution of human problems, and the creative use of
human resources is essential to a healthy, productive
and humane society; and
WHEREAS, our nation’s heritage is based on citizen
involvement and citizen participation, and
volunteerism is of enormous benefit in building a
better community and a better sense of one’s own
wellbeing; and
WHEREAS, the active involvement of citizens is needed
6/24/2026 Page 6 of 98
today more than ever to combat growing human and
social problems, to renew our belief that these
problems can be solved, and to strengthen our sense
of community; and
WHEREAS, volunteering offers all, young and old, the
opportunity to participate in the life of their
community and to link their talents and resources to
address some of the major issues facing our counties,
such as education, hunger, the needs of youths, and
the needs of our elderly; and
WHEREAS, agencies that benefit from volunteers should
show their appreciation and recognition to the many
volunteers who possess numerous skills and talents,
which they generously and enthusiastically apply to a
variety of community tasks, and encourage others to
participate in programs as volunteers; and
WHEREAS, twelve adults in Chesterfield County, aged
60-plus, have donated 137,000 hours of volunteer
service since they have attained the age of 60 and
were nominated for the Chesterfield Senior Volunteer
Hall of Fame.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 24th day of June
2026, publicly recognizes John Hilliard, Jr., David
Lipp and Edith Lumpkin, who were selected among the
twelve and were inducted into the Chesterfield Senior
Volunteer Hall of Fame on June 4, 2026, and expresses
appreciation to these dedicated volunteers who
contribute immeasurably to various programs
throughout the area to strengthen our county and
build bridges to the future.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to John Hilliard, Jr., David
Lipp and Edith Lumpkin and this resolution be
permanently recorded among the papers of this Board
of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
The inductees were appreciative of the recognition.
Board members expressed their gratitude for the hours
and years the inductees have dedicated to serving the
community.
B. Remembering E. Merlin O'Neill, Sr., Former Matoaca
District Supervisor
Board members presented the family of E. Merlin
O'Neill, Sr., former Matoaca District Supervisor,
with a framed photo of the county flag flying at
half-staff on June 6, 2026, in memory of Mr. O'Neill.
They also presented the framed county flag that was
flown and a condolence letter.
C. Resolution Recognizing Mrs. Ellis H. Britton, Fire
and Emergency Medical Services Department, Upon Her
Retirement
6/24/2026 Page 7 of 98
Mrs. Ellis H. Britton was present to receive the
recognition.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mrs. Ellis H. Britton retired from
Chesterfield County Fire and Emergency Medical
Services Department on June 1, 2026; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Britton has faithfully served the
county for 30 years with Chesterfield Fire and EMS;
and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Britton has served as an Audio-Visual
Production Specialist in the department’s Technical
Services Unit, where she continually adapted to
emerging technologies and innovation and contributed
to the unit’s operations and success; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Britton consistently demonstrated
skills and dedication in providing audio-visual
support for numerous departments at a wide range of
events across Chesterfield County, including
groundbreaking ceremonies, community events, school
functions, awards ceremonies, memorial tributes, and
funerals, while demonstrating professionalism,
adaptability, and compassion; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Britton’s efforts have been recognized
and appreciated by public safety agencies across
Chesterfield County and throughout the Commonwealth
of Virginia; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Britton’s commitment to excellence
earned her recognition and appreciation from
leadership and personnel across several county
departments, including County Administration, Fire
and EMS, Police, Sheriff’s Office, Buildings and
Grounds, and Chesterfield County Public Schools; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Britton was awarded an EMS Unit
Citation Award for her collaboration and assistance
during an extensive extrication of a patient involved
in a head-on collision on May 14, 1999; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Britton was awarded Outstanding
Civilian Employee of the Year for 2006 for her hard
work and dedication to Chesterfield Fire and EMS; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Britton’s reliability and support have
left a lasting impact on Chesterfield Fire and EMS
and the many departments and community members she
served.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes the
contributions of Mrs. Ellis H. Britton, expresses the
appreciation of all residents for her service to the
county, and extends their appreciation for her
dedicated service and their congratulations upon her
retirement.
6/24/2026 Page 8 of 98
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Mrs. Britton, and that
this resolution be permanently recorded among the
papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County, Virginia.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
Fire Chief Loy Senter congratulated Mrs. Britton and
wished her the best in her retirement.
Dr. Casey presented Mrs. Britton with a replica of
the brick that will be placed in the walkway in her
honor.
Board members thanked Mrs. Britton for thirty years
of service and for staying on top of the technology
required to do her job with excellence.
D. Resolution Recognizing Mr. Joseph Duty, Assistant
Real Property Manager, Upon His Retirement
Mr. Joseph Duty, accompanied by members of his
family, was present to receive the recognition.
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Joseph Duty will retire from
Chesterfield County on June 1, 2026, after providing
more than 26 years of dedicated service to the
residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Duty was hired by Chesterfield County in
August of 1999 as a right of way technician in the
Department of Utilities; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Duty was quickly promoted to Engineer
Assistant, reviewing site plans as part of the
County’s site plan team; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Duty then was regraded to Senior
Engineering Assistant, continuing as part of the site
plan team and reviewing County CIP projects; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Duty was again promoted to Assistant
Real Property Manager; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Duty’s strong work ethic and high
standards have motivated his staff to strive for
excellence, while his open-door approach has earned
the respect, trust, and admiration of those who work
with him; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Duty’s approachable demeanor and
exemplary customer service skills have ensured that
countless members of the public received outstanding
assistance, further enhancing the image and service
of the county; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Duty has always rendered invaluable
6/24/2026 Page 9 of 98
service with a high degree of productiveness and
professionalism and will be sorely missed by all who
wish him the best.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 24th day of June
2026, publicly recognizes Mr. Joseph Duty and extends
on behalf of its members and the residents of
Chesterfield County, appreciation for more than 26
years of exceptional service to the county.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Mr. Duty, and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers
of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
Director of Utilities Matt Rembold thanked Mr. Duty
for twenty-six years of dedicated service and wished
him a long, happy, and healthy retirement.
Dr. Casey presented Mr. Duty with a replica of the
brick that will be placed in the walkway in his
honor.
Board members thanked Mr. Duty for his outstanding
service to the citizens of the county.
E. Resolution Recognizing Mrs. Katherine Duke,
Automation Coordinator, Upon Her Retirement
Mrs. Katherine Duke, accompanied by members of her
family, was present to receive the recognition.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mrs. Katherine Duke will retire from
Chesterfield County on May 1, 2026, after providing
35 years of dedicated service to the residents of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Duke began her career in Chesterfield
in 1991 as an Emergency Services Dispatcher, holding
multiple positions within both the Police and Fire
departments; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Duke was recognized numerous times by
both the police and fire departments for innovative
thinking, dedication, strong work ethic, process
improvements, and positive attitude; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Duke began her tenure with the
Department of Utilities in July of 2019 as an
Automation Coordinator; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Duke proved to be invaluable during the
COVID pandemic by helping to manage the deployment of
laptops and remote kits to more than 150 staff,
allowing a department that previously had no remote
6/24/2026 Page 10 of 98
work policy to continue its daily operations and
support the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Duke assisted with cybersecurity
initiatives in support of the utilities department’s
Customer Information System and implemented new
security roles in support of the Advanced Metering
Infrastructure project; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Duke successfully managed the Utilities
Help Desk support team, providing technical support
to more than 330 staff members; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Duke provided significant contributions
to Utilities’ lead service line project for which she
was recognized by the department for her significant
contributions; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Duke’s extensive knowledge and
experience have made her not only an indispensable
resource within the utilities department but also a
valued mentor to staff and colleagues across
departments; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Duke demonstrated unwavering loyalty
and exceptional dedication throughout her career,
consistently conducting herself with courtesy,
professionalism, and grace; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Duke has always rendered invaluable
service with a high degree of productiveness and
professionalism and will be sorely missed by all who
wish her the best as she enjoys a well-deserved
retirement that will be marked by more time spent
with family, friends, and plenty of traveling.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 24th day of June
2026, publicly recognizes Mrs. Katherine Duke and
extends on behalf of its members and the residents of
Chesterfield County, appreciation for 35 years of
exceptional service to the county.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Mrs. Duke, and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers
of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
Mr. Rembold thanked Mrs. Duke for her many beneficial
contributions to the Utilities Department.
Dr. Casey presented Mrs. Duke with a replica of the
brick that will be placed in the walkway in her
honor.
Board members thanked Mrs. Duke for her outstanding
service to the county.
Mrs. Duke expressed appreciation for the recognition.
6/24/2026 Page 11 of 98
F. Presentation of Shadow Box to Joseph P. Casey, Ph.D.,
from Police Department
Lieutenant Colonel Mike Louth presented Dr. Casey
with a shadow box and expressed gratitude on behalf
of the Police Department.
Sheriff Karl Leonard presented a shadow box to Dr.
Casey from the Sheriff's Office. He stated that,
because of Dr. Casey's involvement with the HARP
(Helping Addicts Recover Progressively) program, the
men and women wanted to present him with a framed
print of a floral arrangement made in the Therapy
Through Art program. Sheriff Leonard also presented a
framed print of program participants making the
arrangements and a card they made for Dr. Casey
thanking him for his support.
Fire Chief Loy Senter presented a traditional
firefighter shadow box to Dr. Casey in recognition
and appreciation of his unwavering support of the men
and women of Chesterfield Fire and EMS. He wished him
the best in his well-deserved retirement.
G. Resolution Recognizing Joseph P. "Joe" Casey, Ph.D.,
County Administrator, Upon His Retirement
Dr. Casey, accompanied by his wife, was present to
receive the recognition.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Joseph P. “Joe” Casey, Ph.D., a deeply
respected public administrator who has served with an
unwavering commitment to high performance in local
government and continuous enhancement to quality of
life, will retire July 1, 2026, after a decade of
service to Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Casey earned a bachelor's degree in
accounting from the University of Richmond and worked
briefly as an accountant with KPMG before embarking
on his career in local government as a deputy county
administrator with Hanover County; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Casey earned a master's degree in public
finance and a doctoral degree in public policy from
Virginia Commonwealth University, and served for
three years as deputy county manager of Henrico
County before he was appointed county administrator
of Chesterfield County in July 2016; and
WHEREAS, as Chesterfield County administrator, Dr.
Casey oversaw a staff of more than 4,000 full-time
employees and a budget of $2.4 billion; and
WHEREAS, during Dr. Casey’s tenure, Chesterfield
experienced unprecedented economic development that
generated $12 billion in capital investment and the
creation of 10,200 jobs, attracting such well-known
companies as LEGO and Google, as well as Commonwealth
Fusion Systems’ first-of-its-kind grid-scale nuclear
6/24/2026 Page 12 of 98
fusion power plant; and
WHEREAS, under Dr. Casey’s leadership, Chesterfield
bolstered its exceptional financial standing,
becoming Virginia’s first locality to attain the
coveted AAA bond rating from four top rating
agencies, also known as Quad-AAA; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Casey made unprecedented progress in
improving Virginia’s second-largest road network —
most notably providing local funding for Phase I of
the Powhite Parkway Extension, a project that has
been on Chesterfield’s thoroughfare plan since the
1980s, with hundreds of millions of dollars of
additional infrastructure improvements in the
construction pipeline; and
WHEREAS, over the past decade, Chesterfield has
allocated more than $1 billion toward public
facilities that enhance quality of life for a growing
population, including the construction of 12 new
schools and the renovation of two others, three new
fire stations, two new parks and community recreation
centers, and a new library; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Casey oversaw major investments in the
county government workforce, implementing a historic
pay plan that brought salaries into market-
competitive positions, and restructured departments
in ways that enhanced the delivery of services and
programs; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Casey fostered outstanding relationships
with businesses, colleges and universities, and
nonprofit organizations in ways that have enhanced
quality of life; and
WHEREAS, following a public service career that has
spanned 37 years and three of the Richmond region’s
four large localities, Dr. Casey is leaving
Chesterfield in a better place than he found it,
having instilled a legacy of compassion for others,
community pride and absolute integrity.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 24th day of June
2026, publicly recognizes the invaluable service of
Dr. Joe Casey, expresses the appreciation of the
Board for his many contributions to the County, and
extends heartfelt congratulations to Dr. Casey upon
his retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Dr. Casey, and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers
of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
Board members highly praised Dr. Casey for all he has
done for the county over the last ten years and
6/24/2026 Page 13 of 98
wished him well in his retirement.
Dr. Casey expressed appreciation to the Board members
and stated he was honored and grateful.
15. New Business
A. Claim of Pocoshock, LLC Requesting Compensation for
an Alleged Inverse Condemnation of Property
County Attorney Jeff Mincks provided the Board with
details of the claim of Pocoshock, LLC requesting
compensation for an alleged inverse condemnation of
property. He stated staff recommended denial of the
claim.
The claimant's representative, Henry E. Howell, III,
presented Pocoshock, LLC's claim to the Board.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the
Board denied the claim of Pocoshock, LLC requesting
compensation for an alleged inverse condemnation of
property.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider and Hylton.
Nays: None.
B. Confirmation of the Selection of a New County
Administrator
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board confirmed the selection of Dr. Kevin A.
Catlin as Chesterfield County Administrator effective
August 24, 2026.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
C. Appointments
1. Interim County Administrator
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the
Board appointed Deputy County Administrator
Christopher "Matt" Harris to be the Interim County
Administrator effective July 1, 2026, until August
23, 2026.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
2. Community Criminal Justice Board
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Dr. Hylton, the
Board nominated/appointed/reappointed Jason Smith,
Midlothian District, and Linnea Parker, Clover Hill
District, to serve as at-large representatives on the
Community Criminal Justice Board, whose terms are
effective July 1, 2026, and will expire June 30,
2028.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
6/24/2026 Page 14 of 98
3. Richmond Regional Transportation Planning
Organization's Community Transportation Advisory
Committee
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Mr. Carroll,
the Board nominated/appointed/reappointed Sheretta
Byrd, Bermuda District, Courtney Hamilton, Dale
District, Rodriques Jackson, Dale District, and Erin
Phelan, Midlothian District, to serve as at-large
representatives on the Community Transportation
Advisory Committee, whose terms are effective July 1,
2026, and will expire June 30, 2028.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
4. Economic Development Authority
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Hylton,
the Board nominated/reappointed Jesse Calloway,
Matoaca District, to serve as an at-large
representative on the Economic Development Authority,
whose term is effective July 1, 2026, and will expire
June 30, 2030.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
5. The First Tee of Greater Richmond
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the
Board nominated/appointed Keith Windle, Midlothian
District, and Bryan Jones, Midlothian District, to
serve as at-large representatives on The First Tee of
Greater Richmond Board of Directors, whose terms are
effective immediately and will expire June 30, 2029.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
6. Richmond Metropolitan Transportation Authority
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Mr. Ingle,
the Board nominated/reappointed Supervisor Jessica
Schneider, Board of Supervisors, Dean Lynch,
Midlothian District, Ian Millikan, Midlothian
District, Steven Mulroy, Midlothian District, and
Donald Williams, Clover Hill District, to serve as
at-large representatives on the Richmond Metropolitan
Transportation Authority, whose terms are effective
July 1, 2026, and will expire June 30, 2030.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
7. Social Services Board
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board nominated/reappointed Shauna Mayo, Matoaca
District, and Cathy Robins, Clover Hill District, to
serve as at-large representatives on the Social
Services Board, whose terms are effective July 1,
2026, and will expire June 30, 2030.
6/24/2026 Page 15 of 98
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
D. Consent Items (14.D.1. - 14.D.8.b.)
1. Adoption of Resolutions
a. Resolution Recognizing Battalion Chief
Charles M. Knowles Jr., Fire and Emergency
Medical Services Department, Upon His
Retirement
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Battalion Chief Charles M. Knowles, Jr.
retired from the Chesterfield Fire and Emergency
Medical Services (CFEMS) Department on May 1, 2026;
and
WHEREAS, Battalion Chief Knowles started his career
with Recruit School #30 in February 2001, and served
the residents of Chesterfield County for 32 years in
various assignments as a firefighter, lieutenant, and
captain at the Bensley, Centralia, Dale, Midlothian,
and Swift Creek Fire and EMS Stations, and as a
battalion chief in the Northern, Southern, and
Western Battalions; and
WHEREAS, Battalion Chief Knowles oversaw the Fire &
Life Safety Division as Deputy Fire Marshal, and was
instrumental in the education, engineering and
enforcement of life safety codes and best practices
for residents and businesses from 2013 - 2018; and
WHEREAS, Battalion Chief Knowles was a founding
member and lead voice in the establishment of the
department’s Peer Support Team beginning in 2009; and
WHEREAS, Battalion Chief Knowles served as the
Maritime Incident Response Team (MIRT) program
manager from 2024-2026; and
WHEREAS, Battalion Chief Knowles served as a tenured
contributor to the Fire & EMS honor guard at
countless formal functions; and
WHEREAS, Battalion Chief Knowles was awarded EMS
Lifesave and Unit Citation Awards for his involvement
in the successful outcome of a patient suffering
cardiac arrest on September 6, 2001; and
WHEREAS, Battalion Chief Knowles was awarded an EMS
Unit Citation Award for his involvement in rescuing
and treating a patient that was involved in a tree
trimming accident on June 2, 2002; and
WHEREAS, Battalion Chief Knowles was awarded EMS
Lifesave and Unit Citation Awards for his involvement
in the successful outcome of a patient suffering
cardiac arrest on September 22, 2002; and
6/24/2026 Page 16 of 98
WHEREAS, Battalion Chief Knowles was awarded a Unit
Citation Award for his efforts in rescuing a 13 year
old patient who was trapped under a tree that had
fallen into a house on September 25, 2006; and
WHEREAS, Battalion Chief Knowles was awarded a Unit
Lifesave Award for his heroic actions as part of
Virginia Task Force 8 during the swift water rescues
of residents in Wythe County during Hurricane Helene
on September 27, 2024; and
WHEREAS, Battalion Chief Knowles has been recognized
countless times for exceptional service to residents
and fellow county employees and public safety
partners.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the
contributions of Battalion Chief Charles M. Knowles,
Jr. and expresses the appreciation of all residents
for his service to the County and extends their
appreciation for his dedicated service and their
congratulations upon his retirement.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
b. Resolution Recognizing Captain William H.
Yates, Fire and EMS Department, Upon His
Retirement
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Captain William “Bill” H. Yates retired from
the Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services
(CFEMS) Department on May 1, 2026; and
WHEREAS, Captain Yates completed recruit school #21
in July 1989 and has faithfully served the residents
of Chesterfield County for nearly 37 years as a
Firefighter, Lieutenant, and Captain, at the Dutch
Gap, Matoaca, Clover Hill, Airport, Rockwood, and
Magnolia Green Fire and EMS Stations; and
WHEREAS, Captain Yates served as Paramedic beginning
in 1989; and
WHEREAS, Captain Yates served as a member of the
CFEMS Hazardous Incident Team from 1994-2021; and
WHEREAS, Captain Yates served as a member of the
Advanced Life Support Field Training Officer (FTO)
Program from 1998-2025; and
WHEREAS, Captain Yates served as both a Lieutenant
and Captain in the ISP (Information Systems and
Planning) Division from 2009-2019; and
WHEREAS, Captain Yates received multiple EMS Life
Save Awards in recognition of his critical
contributions to the successful rescue of a teenager
whose vehicle had overturned in water on February 26,
6/24/2026 Page 17 of 98
1991; a patient experiencing acute shortness of
breath due to a laryngospasm on February 8, 2005; a
patient in cardiac arrest on December 20, 2007; and
for his exemplary performance and commendable service
in aiding a patient who was not breathing due to
choking on June 16, 2015; and
WHEREAS, Captain Yates was awarded a Unit Citation
Award in recognition of his role in safely
extricating a patient from an overturned vehicle on
October 2, 2019; and
WHEREAS, Captain Yates was awarded a Unit Life Save
Award for his involvement in the successful outcome
of a patient suffering cardiac arrest on December 13,
2019; and
WHEREAS, Captain Yates was awarded a Unit Life Save
Award for his involvement in the successful outcome
of a multi-vehicle motor vehicle accident with
entrapments on May 15, 2020; and
WHEREAS, Captain Yates was awarded a Unit Life Save
Award for his involvement in the successful outcome
of a patient suffering cardiac arrest on December 14,
2021; and
WHEREAS, Captain Yates was awarded a Unit Life Save
Award for his involvement in the successful outcome
of a pediatric patient who was struck by a vehicle on
April 14, 2022.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the valuable
contributions of Captain William “Bill” H. Yates,
expresses the appreciation of all residents for his
service and dedication to the county, and extends
congratulations upon his retirement.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
c. Resolution Recognizing Amy V. Knight,
Police Department, Upon Her Retirement
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Amy V. Knight will retire from the
Chesterfield County Police Department on July 1,
2026, after providing over 27 years of quality
service to the residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Knight began her career with the
Chesterfield County Police Department in 1999 as a
Senior Automation Analyst, later serving as a
Forensic Investigator, Senior Forensic Investigator;
and Automation Analyst Telestaff Administrator;
WHEREAS, Mrs. Knight has been an integral part of
technology modernization programs such as the
Computer Aided Dispatch, Telestaff, and Records
Management System implementation.
6/24/2026 Page 18 of 98
WHEREAS, Mrs. Knight was the recipient of the 2002
Professional Staff of the Year Award, a testament to
her tremendous work ethic and technical expertise;
including assisting in establishing the Forensic
Computer Lab; making her deserving of recognition;
WHEREAS, Mrs. Knight was the recipient of the 2002
Achievement Award, recognizing her assistance to
Juvenile Detectives in retrieving evidence from
seized computers, and contributions to projects such
as the Annual Report including support in various
tasks such as consistent budget review;
WHEREAS, Mrs. Knight and her colleagues in the
Systems Support Unit received a Unit Citation to
recognize their dedication and service to the
department for the successful implementation of the
Public Safety Phase I and II Projects from January
2004 to April 2005.
WHEREAS, Mrs. Knight is recognized for her receipt of
Chief’s Commendations in 2021 and 2026; in 2021 she
played a key role in supporting major organizational
changes within the department, including
implementation of new beats and call signs, and a new
work schedule; and further, in 2026 provided critical
support during the County’s transition to the Workday
system while reducing confusion and maintaining
confidence throughout the department;
WHEREAS, Mrs. Knight has provided the Chesterfield
County Police Department with many years of loyal and
dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Mrs. Knight’s diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mrs. Amy V.
Knight and extends on behalf of its members and the
residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation for
her service to the county, congratulations upon her
retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
d. Resolution Recognizing Firefighter David
(Doc) K. Watson, Fire and Emergency Medical
Services Department, Upon His Retirement
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Firefighter David “Doc” K. Watson retired
from the Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical
Services (CFEMS) Department on June 1, 2026; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Watson completed Recruit School
#30 in 2001 and has faithfully served the residents
of Chesterfield County for 25 years in various
6/24/2026 Page 19 of 98
assignments as a firefighter at the Manchester,
Clover Hill, Buford, Phillips, and Airport Fire and
EMS stations and as a firefighter technician in the
Resource Management Division; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Watson served as a member of the
CFEMS Hazardous Incident Team beginning in April of
2005; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Watson served as a charter
member of the CFEMS Incident Management Team
beginning in July of 2017; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Watson received EMS Unit
Citation Awards for his involvement in the successful
outcome of two critically injured patients following
a head on collision on October 2, 2002, for his
involvement in the extrication of two trapped
patients who sustained severe injuries when their
vehicle struck a tree head on on October 25, 2002;
and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Watson received an EMS Unit
Citation Award for his involvement in the successful
outcome of two patients who were trapped after their
vehicle struck a tree on January 22, 2004; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Watson received an EMS Unit
Citation Award for his involvement in the care and
treatment of a pediatric patient who was struck by a
vehicle on March 10, 2006 as well as for his role in
the positive outcome of a patient who was ejected
from a vehicle during an accident on April 18, 2006;
and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Watson received Unit Citation
Awards for his role in rescuing a teenager who was
trapped under a tree that had fallen into his house
on September 25, 2006 and for providing care and
treatment to a severely injured patient involved in a
vehicle accident on December 14, 2006; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Watson was awarded an EMS
Lifesave Award and an EMS Unit Citation Award for his
role in the successful treatment of a patient
experiencing breathing difficulties on February 3,
2011; and
WHEREAS, Firefighter Watson was awarded an EMS
Lifesave Award for his involvement in the successful
outcome of a patient who suffered a seizure and was
not breathing on August 29, 2012.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the valuable
contributions of Firefighter David “Doc” K. Watson,
expresses the appreciation of all residents for his
service and dedication to the county, and extends
appreciation for his dedicated service and
congratulations upon his retirement.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
6/24/2026 Page 20 of 98
e. Resolution Recognizing Karen Ann Aylward,
Economic Development, Upon Her Retirement
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mrs. Karen A. Aylward retired from the
Chesterfield County Department of Economic
Development on December 31, 2021, after more than 21
years of dedicated service to the citizens of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Aylward joined the department as a
Project Manager in June 2000 after working for the
State of Virginia in the Department of Business
Assistance for 7 years; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Aylward provided timely responses to
prospective businesses, provided site and building
recommendations, hosted prospects during site visits
and special events, conducted sales presentations to
prospective businesses, completed return on
investment analysis for calculation of incentives,
provided information on financing options and State-
offered programs; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Aylward oversaw the Countywide Business
Visitation Program, assisted companies with expansion
plans that included zoning, permitting, and
financing, provided direct assistance to
entrepreneurs and small business owners regarding
licensing procedures, taxation issues, legal and
accounting issues, and other specialized resources
available to small and minority owned businesses with
workshops and training programs; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Aylward was promoted to Assistant
Director of Economic Development in November of 2015
and supervised department staff and supported the
Economic Development Authority; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Aylward, assisted in the development
and implementation of strategies, policies and
programs that supported the County’s overall economic
goals and objectives, participated in the County’s
Comprehensive Plan development, and participated in
the County wide initiatives that included the Active
Living Plan, Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC), the
Richmond Region Planning District Commission,
Financial Independence Impact Team, and the
Government Citizen Academy; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Aylward served on the Capital Region
Workforce Development Board to grow a skilled
workforce and to continue to attract new talent and
businesses to the County and region; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Aylward served on the Board of the
BizWorks Enterprise Center, collaborated with the
County’s Purchasing
Department, the Metropolitan Business League, the
Asian Chamber of Commerce, the Chesterfield Chamber,
6/24/2026 Page 21 of 98
and the Greater Southport Business Association to
grow small business in the County; and
WHEREAS, since 2000, Mrs. Aylward has participated in
economic development activities resulting in 280
announced projects totaling more than $5.5 billion in
capital investment and the creation of 21,267 jobs,
contributing significantly to Chesterfield County’s
growth and prosperity; and
WHEREAS, through more than 21 years of public
service, Mrs. Aylward has demonstrated exceptional
leadership, innovation, vision, and dedication to the
citizens of Chesterfield County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the
outstanding contributions of Mrs. Karen Ann Aylward,
and thanks her family, husband, Art Aylward,
daughters Kimberly Aylward, Jennifer Meharg and
Jessica Vellucci and son, Christopher Aylward for her
many contributions to the citizens of Chesterfield
County, and extends to them its heartfelt
appreciation for her dedicated service to
Chesterfield County.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
f. Resolution Recognizing Mr. Scott Peach,
Procurement Department, Upon His Retirement
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Scott Peach will retire from
Chesterfield County on July 1, 2026, after providing
more than thirty years of dedicated and faithful
service to the residents of Chesterfield; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Peach began his service on October 2,
1995, as a Buyer Expeditor/Procurement Administrator
for the Information Systems Technology Department and
in 2002 continued his distinguished career in the
Procurement Department as Senior Automation Analyst
and finally as Automation Coordinator supervising the
Automation team; and
WHEREAS, throughout his career, Mr. Peach offered
steady leadership grounded in technical expertise,
patience, and mentorship that strengthened and
advanced departmental capabilities; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Peach played a critical role in two
countywide Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system
implementations, the County’s first system with the
InFocus project and most recently the Workday
implementation, providing vital system knowledge,
cross-departmental coordination, and user support
that ensured smooth transitions for County and
Schools staff; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Peach successfully coordinated and
6/24/2026 Page 22 of 98
completed fiscal year-end closeouts for almost two
decades, demonstrating unmatched attention to detail,
accuracy, and reliability in meeting essential annual
financial and operational deadlines; and
WHEREAS, in addition to his technical
responsibilities, Mr. Peach taught system training
for employees, managed Help Desk operations, and
resolved thousands of customer requests, consistently
delivering service marked by patience,
professionalism, and a genuine desire to help others;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Peach’s work regularly connected him
with employees across all County and Schools
departments, where he was known for his warm
demeanor, cooperative spirit, and exceptional
customer service—qualities that earned him the
respect, trust, and appreciation of colleagues and
customers alike; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Peach’s extensive knowledge, high
standards, and collaborative mindset made him an
indispensable resource and a true ambassador for the
Procurement Department, setting a standard of
excellence for all who follow.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. Scott
Peach, and extends on behalf of its members and the
residents of Chesterfield County, sincere
appreciation for his outstanding service, his
dedication to improving systems and service delivery,
and his unwavering commitment to supporting County
and Schools operations.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
g. Resolution Recognizing Sergeant Bryan D.
Dewell, Police Department, Upon His
Retirement
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Sergeant Bryan D. Dewell will retire from
the Chesterfield County Police Department on July 1,
2026, after providing 28 years of quality service to
the residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Dewell began his career path as a
recruit in 1998 and continued to faithfully serve the
county as a Patrol Officer, Senior Police Officer,
Master Police Officer, Career Police Officer,
Corporal and Sergeant; and
WHEREAS, during his tenure, Sergeant Dewell has also
served as a Field Training Officer, Evidence
Technician, General Instructor, Crisis Intervention
Training Instructor, Desk Officer, Drug Court
Officer, Police Cadet Mentor and Patrol Rifle
Operator; and
6/24/2026 Page 23 of 98
WHEREAS, Sergeant Dewell was recognized with an
Achievement Award for his quick actions after a
report of weapons being stolen from a neighborhood
vehicle, and upon hearing a report of shots fired and
the name of a possible juvenile suspect, proceeded to
the address, locating and arresting him as well as
three other juveniles who were attempting to hide the
stolen weapons and flee from the scene; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Dewell utilized his extensive
computer and software knowledge while he was a
recruit in the Basic Academy, working on his own
time, to create a spreadsheet to track and calculate
recruit grade point averages, scores and other data
saving numerous hours of manual calculations for the
current and future academies; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Dewell is credited with developing
numerous time and money-saving police databases
including the Personnel Management System, Subpoena
Management, Court Management, Officer Off-Duty
Overtime database and was recognized by Sheriff
Clarence Williams for his critical contributions in
the development of the VLEPSC Accreditation database;
and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Dewell is recognized for his strong
work ethic, his effective teamwork, and human
relations skills which he has utilized within the
Police Department and in assisting residents during
his career; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Dewell was consistently recognized
by supervisors for mentoring newer officers and
always taking time to answer questions; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Dewell has provided the
Chesterfield County Police Department with many years
of loyal and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Sergeant Dewell's diligent
service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Sergeant Bryan
D. Dewell and extends on behalf of its members and
the residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation
for his service to the county, congratulations upon
his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
h. Resolution Recognizing Laura Nelson,
Utilities Department, Upon Her Retirement
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Ms. Laura Nelson retired from Chesterfield
6/24/2026 Page 24 of 98
County on June 1, 2026, after providing over 34 years
of quality service to the residents of Chesterfield
County; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Nelson was hired by Chesterfield County
in 1991 as a cashier in the Office of the Treasurer;
and
WHEREAS, Ms. Nelson continued to advance her career,
taking on a series of increasingly responsible
positions within the Office of the Treasurer; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Nelson accepted the position of revenue
collection agent in the Department of Utilities in
2016 and continued to serve the residents of
Chesterfield County with dedication until her
retirement; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Nelson represented the county with
professionalism and provided residents with a high
level of timely, accurate, and detailed information;
and
WHEREAS, Ms. Nelson demonstrated strong knowledge,
skills, and abilities in effective revenue collection
techniques while consistently remaining courteous and
respectful to our residents; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Nelson was highly customer service
oriented and consistently dedicated to her work,
demonstrating a genuine commitment to treating
residents the way she would want to be treated, all
while upholding the department’s reputation for
providing exceptional service; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Nelson was instrumental in maintaining a
culture that led to the Department of Utilities being
awarded 12 National Association of Counties
achievement awards and a Virginia Association of
Counties award during her tenure; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Nelson was known as a knowledgeable
resource who was always willing to provide answers in
her area of expertise and to share knowledge to carry
on the culture of customer service she enhanced
during her time with Chesterfield County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the
outstanding contributions of Ms. Laura Nelson and
extends appreciation, on behalf of its members and
the employees and citizens of Chesterfield County,
for over 34 years of dedicated service to the county,
congratulations upon her retirement, and best wishes
in her next season of life.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
i. Resolution Recognizing Corporal Thomas N.
Spivey, Police Department, Upon His
Retirement
6/24/2026 Page 25 of 98
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Corporal Thomas N. Spivey will retire from
the Chesterfield County Police Department on July 12,
2026, after providing over 15 years of outstanding
quality service to the residents of Chesterfield
County; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Spivey began his career as a
Recruit in 2011 and continued to faithfully serve as
a Police Officer, Officer First Class, Senior Police
Officer, Master Police Officer, Career Police
Officer, and Corporal; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Spivey distinguished himself as a
patrol officer by remaining deeply community-focused,
consistently engaging with residents to build trust
and strengthen public safety, while also
demonstrating a proactive and highly productive work
ethic; and
WHEREAS, during his tenure, Corporal Spivey also
served as a Field Training Officer during the
inaugural year of the Police Service Aide program and
as School Resource Officer; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Spivey received a Unit Citation as
a member of the School Safety Unit for working
collaboratively with internal and external
stakeholders to preserve and protect the most
vulnerable, the children of Chesterfield County, and
has continued this commitment by helping safeguard
the more than 64,000 students of the County through
initiatives that strengthen school safety, promote
engagement, and enhance preparedness across all
educational environments; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Spivey has played an integral role
in a unit that has assumed responsibility for the
Police Activities League (PAL), Therapy Dog, and
Cadet Programs, as well as with Child Safety
Officers, recognizing that a child’s path to success
begins with education and partnering with the
Department of Criminal Justice Services to bring its
STEPP curriculum to students throughout the
Commonwealth under the moniker “BE SAFE”; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Spivey is recognized for his
effective collaboration with fellow officers, and the
interpersonal skills he consistently demonstrated
throughout his service, applying his knowledge to
support younger officers while remaining focused on
the community and the students and families he
served; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Spivey has provided the
Chesterfield County Police with many years of loyal
and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Corporal Spivey's diligent
service.
6/24/2026 Page 26 of 98
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Corporal
Thomas N. Spivey and extends on behalf of its members
and the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation
for his service to the county, congratulations upon
his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
j. Resolution Recognizing Rodger A. Slate,
Building Inspection, Upon His Retirement
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Rodger A. Slate will retire from
Chesterfield County on July 1, 2026, after 31 years
of dedicated and distinguished service to the
residents and business community of Chesterfield
County; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Slate began his career with Chesterfield
County in June 1994 as a Structural Inspector in the
Department of Building Inspection; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Slate earned the respect of colleagues,
contractors, and industry professionals through his
exceptional knowledge of building construction and
code enforcement, as demonstrated by his attainment
of numerous certifications through the Virginia
Department of Housing and Community Development,
including achieving the prestigious Building Official
certification in August 2013; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Slate’s dedication, professionalism, and
strong work ethic led to his promotion to Chief of
Commercial Plan Review in August 2012, where he
played a vital role in assisting contractors, design
professionals, and citizens in achieving safe, code-
compliant commercial buildings; and
WHEREAS, through his unwavering commitment to public
safety and code compliance, Mr. Slate has helped
ensure that the citizens and visitors of Chesterfield
County benefit from safe, resilient, and properly
constructed buildings in accordance with the Virginia
Uniform Statewide Building Code; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Slate’s leadership, professionalism, and
dedication to public service have left a lasting and
meaningful impact on Chesterfield County and the
building safety profession.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes and
commends Mr. Rodger A. Slate for his outstanding
contributions and faithful service to Chesterfield
County and extends its sincere appreciation,
congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes
for continued happiness and success in the years
6/24/2026 Page 27 of 98
ahead.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
k. Resolution Recognizing Janice M. Herron,
Department of General Services, Buildings
and Grounds Division, Upon Her Retirement.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Ms. Janice M. Herron will retire from
Chesterfield County Department of General Services,
Buildings and Grounds Division, on July 1, 2026,
after providing over 34 years of service to the
residents of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Herron began her career in Chesterfield
County Government on November 4, 1988, as a temporary
employee in Waste and Resource Recovery; and
WHEREAS, in 2000, Ms. Herron was promoted to
Principal Account Clerk in the Fleet Services
Division where she continued to increase her
financial skills; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Herron served on a team that assisted
with the implementation of new fleet management
information software to maintain electronic records
of county vehicles, improve fuel tracking and other
administrative functions; and
WHEREAS, in 2000, Ms. Herron was selected by her
peers as the Fleet Employee of the Year; and
WHEREAS, in 2004, after a break in service, Ms.
Herron was rehired as a Customer Service
Representative in Waste and Resource Recovery; and
WHEREAS, in 2005, Ms. Herron was promoted to Senior
Accounting Technician responsible for procurement,
accounts payable, deposits, and assisted with the
development of the general ledger upload to automated
cash receipts; and
WHEREAS, in July 2006 Ms. Herron’s position was
reclassified to Accountant; and
WHEREAS, in 2007, Ms. Herron was promoted to
Administrative Manager responsible for all financial
and customer service functions; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Herron served on the team that managed
the refuse service program for county residents and
developed internal policies and procedures for a
point-of-sale application for the Convenience
Centers; and
WHEREAS, in 2010, Ms. Herron led a team to implement
processes and procedures associated with
implementation of a new annual fee for curbside
recycling; and
6/24/2026 Page 28 of 98
WHEREAS, in 2019, Ms. Herron’s position transferred
to Buildings and Grounds where she continued to
innovate, improve processes and provide excellent
service to internal and external customers; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Herron is widely regarded for her
pleasant demeanor, collaboration skills, customer
service focus and institutional knowledge; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Herron is commended for sustained
excellence, professionalism, integrity, innovation,
and commitment to public service, and for the lasting
positive impact she has made on her department,
colleagues, and the community she serves.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Ms. Janice M.
Herron and extends on behalf of its members and the
residents of Chesterfield County, appreciation for
over 34 years of exceptional service to the county.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
l. Resolution Recognizing Rebecca L. Summers,
Building Inspection, Upon Her Retirement
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Ms. Rebecca L. Summers will retire from
Chesterfield County on July 1, 2026, following 30
years of dedicated and distinguished service to the
residents and business community of Chesterfield
County; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Summers began her career with
Chesterfield County on March 25, 1996, as a Customer
Service Supervisor in the Department of Building
Inspection; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Summers was recognized by the
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors as the
Department of Building Inspection’s Employee of the
Year in 2000 in recognition of her exceptional
service and commitment; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Summers played an integral role in the
development and configuration of Community
Development’s original customer service center, and
her influence continues through the policies and
procedures she implemented that remain in use today;
and
WHEREAS, Ms. Summers’ dedication, professionalism,
and exemplary work ethic led to her promotion to
Customer Operations Administrator in June 2012, where
she provided leadership in managing office
operations, customer service, and automation
initiatives; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Summers earned her Permit Technician
6/24/2026 Page 29 of 98
certification through the Virginia Department of
Housing and Community Development on September 10,
2019, leading by example and encouraging numerous
permit technicians to pursue the same professional
achievement; and
WHEREAS, throughout her career, Ms. Summers
demonstrated outstanding leadership, professionalism,
and commitment to public service, leaving a lasting
and meaningful impact on Chesterfield County and the
Department of Building Inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes and
commends Ms. Rebecca L. Summers for her outstanding
contributions and faithful service to Chesterfield
County, extends its sincere appreciation and
congratulations upon her retirement, and offers best
wishes for continued happiness, health, and success
in the years ahead.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
m. Resolution Recognizing Lieutenant David A.
Sawyer, Police Department, Upon His
Retirement
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Lieutenant David A. Sawyer will retire from
the Chesterfield County Police Department on July 1,
2026, after providing over 22 years of outstanding
quality service to the residents of Chesterfield
County; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Sawyer began his career as a
Recruit in 2004 and continued to faithfully serve as
a Police Officer, Officer First Class, Senior Police
Officer, Master Police Officer, Sergeant, and
Lieutenant; and
WHEREAS, during his tenure, Lieutenant Sawyer also
served as a Field Training Officer, School Resource
Officer, Evidence Technician, Marine Patrol Officer
and Desk Officer, and was a member of SWAT, the
Special Response Unit and Special Enforcement Team;
and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Sawyer received a Unit Citation
as a member of the Special Enforcement Team for the
high intensity proactive crime patrols in the
county’s highest crime areas during a one-year period
that resulted in nearly 4,100 traffic, narcotics and
DUI arrests and led to significant downward trends in
street robberies and other assorted crimes in the
county; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Sawyer was awarded the Chief’s
Commendation for his outstanding performance working
with canine officers to quickly apprehend two
suspects responsible for breaking into a local store
6/24/2026 Page 30 of 98
and stealing electronics equipment; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Sawyer earned another Chief’s
Commendation as part of a Special Enforcement Team
operation arresting thirteen suspects for drug
distribution and culminating in the seizure of drugs,
120 cartons of cigarettes, three vehicles and nine
thousand dollars in currency; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Sawyer was recognized with the
Achievement Award for his work on the Special
Enforcement Team when an executed search warrant
revealed a large-scale marijuana operation at a
residence with multiple suspects arrested for
distribution, possession by a felon of a stolen
handgun and charges filed for child endangerment and
neglect; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Sawyer was a member of the Police
Department’s Law Enforcement Explorer Post 609 from
1991 to 1996; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Sawyer earned the Top Recruit
award for the 43rd Police Basic Training Academy; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Sawyer is recognized for his
strong work ethic, teamwork, and excellent
communications skills; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Lieutenant Sawyer's diligent
service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Lieutenant
David A. Sawyer and extends on behalf of its members
and the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation
for his service to the county, congratulations upon
his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
n. Resolution Recognizing the Achievements of
Mary Ellen Howe
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
wishes to recognize and honor Mary Ellen Howe for her
extraordinary, decades long record of volunteer
service, leadership, scholarship, and dedication to
preserving and promoting the rich history of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mary Ellen has been a devoted volunteer
contributing to the preservation, interpretation, and
public engagement of the County’s historic assets,
including Eppington, Magnolia Grange, and related
historical programs; and
6/24/2026 Page 31 of 98
WHEREAS, Mary Ellen served as the Executive Director
of the Eppington Foundation for 35 years,
significantly advancing the preservation and
interpretation of one of Chesterfield’s most
important historic properties; and
WHEREAS, Mary Ellen was a Charter Member of the
Chesterfield Historical Society of Virginia (CHSV) in
September 1981 and, along with Lucille Moseley and
Pattie Grady, formed the trio that initiated the
establishment of the organization, laying the
foundation for historical preservation in
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mary Ellen served CHSV as a Board Director
from 1983 to 1985, a member of the Executive Board in
1984, and a vital contributor to the Magnolia Grange
Accessions and Fundraising Committee from 1984 to
1988; and
WHEREAS, Mary Ellen’s scholarship and writing have
made lasting contributions to the understanding of
Chesterfield’s heritage, including the publication of
four genealogical volumes documenting the descendants
of Richard Bailey between 1984 and 2017, as well as
numerous additional historical works; and
WHEREAS, in 1987 Mary Ellen conducted a significant
salvage archaeological dig at Magnolia Grange,
discovering hundreds of Delftware pottery shards that
were later reconstructed and used as models for
fundraising items benefiting CHSV; and
WHEREAS, Mary Ellen was instrumental in advocating
for the establishment of the Chesterfield Historic
Preservation Committee, created by the Board of
Supervisors in 1987, serving on the committee from
March 11, 1987, to February 25, 2025; and
WHEREAS, Mary Ellen served as the first and only
Chairwoman of the Historic Preservation Committee for
37 years, providing exceptional leadership,
continuity, and guidance that strengthened the
County’s ability to preserve and protect historic
resources; and
WHEREAS, through her work with property owners, Mary
Ellen diligently built and maintained the
relationships necessary to secure the preservation of
numerous historic sites, ensuring that important
properties were recognized, protected, and documented
for future generations; and
WHEREAS, beyond her formal committee work, Mary Ellen
contributed to the cultural life of the county
through painting, publications, archaeological
endeavors, and historical interpretation, including
her acclaimed 1994 portrait of Pocahontas, the
product of six years of research and considered one
of the most accurate depictions based on Indigenous
features and historical sources; and
WHEREAS, through all her work, Mary Ellen
6/24/2026 Page 32 of 98
demonstrated a profound appreciation for the history
that has shaped Chesterfield County, and her passion,
leadership, and dedication have left an enduring
legacy admired by colleagues, historians, volunteers,
and residents alike.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes Mary
Ellen Howe for her outstanding volunteer service,
visionary leadership, and lifelong commitment to
preserving the history of Chesterfield County;
extends its sincere appreciation for her tireless
efforts and lasting contributions; and wishes her the
best in future endeavors.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
o. Resolutions Authorizing General Obligation
Bonds for School Capital Projects and
Revenue Bonds for School Major Maintenance
and County Facility Modernization Projects
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND AWARD OF GENERAL OBLIGATION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, IN THE MAXIMUM AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $141,000,000, HERETOFORE AUTHORIZED, AND PROVIDING FOR THE FORM, DETAILS AND PAYMENT THEREOF
WHEREAS, by resolution adopted on June 29, 2022 (the
“Authorizing Resolution”), the Board of Supervisors
(the “Board”) of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia
(the “County”) (a) authorized the issuance of general
obligation capital improvement bonds in the maximum
principal amount of $540,000,000 to finance various
capital improvement projects for (i) public school
system purposes, (ii) public safety purposes, (iii)
public library purposes and (iv) parks and recreation
purposes (collectively, the “Projects”), subject to
the approval of the voters at a special election, and
(b) requested the Circuit Court of the County of
Chesterfield to order a special election on the
issuance of such bonds;
WHEREAS, pursuant to a special election held on
November 8, 2022 (the “Election”), the qualified
voters of the County approved the issuance of general
obligation bonds of the County in the maximum
principal amount of $540,000,000 to finance the
Projects;
WHEREAS, the County has previously issued
$269,800,000 of principal amount of such general
obligation bonds and $270,200,000 of principal amount
remains authorized but unissued;
WHEREAS, the Board desires to (a) issue up to
$141,000,000 of additional principal amount of such
6/24/2026 Page 33 of 98
general obligation bonds (as further described
herein, the “Bonds”) authorized by the Authorizing
Resolution and approved by the qualified voters of
the County pursuant to the Election and (b) use the
proceeds thereof to (i) finance a portion of the
costs of the Projects for public school purposes,
including but not limited to improving, equipping,
constructing, renovating and expanding various public
school facilities (including but not limited to
Bensley Elementary School, Deep Creek Elementary
School, Grange Hall Elementary School and West Ridge
High School), and (ii) pay the related costs of
issuance; and
WHEREAS, the County administration, in consultation
with Davenport & Company LLC, acting as the County’s
financial advisor (the “Financial Advisor”), has
recommended that the County sell the Bonds through
one of the following methods: (a) a public offering
through a competitive sale or (b) a public offering
through a negotiated underwriting;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA:
1. Issuance of Bonds. Pursuant to the
Constitution and statutes of the Commonwealth of
Virginia, including the Public Finance Act of 1991,
and in accordance with the authorization of the
Authorizing Resolution and the approval of the
qualified voters pursuant to the Election, the
Board hereby provides for the issuance and sale of
the Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to
exceed $141,000,000 to finance a portion of the
costs of the Projects and to pay the related costs
of issuance.
2. Bond Details.
(a) The Bonds shall be designated “General
Obligation Public Improvement Bonds, Series
2026A” or such other designation as the County
Administrator (such term as used herein to
include the County Administrator and any acting
or interim County Administrator and the Deputy
County Administrator for Finance and
Administration) may determine, shall be in
registered form, shall be dated such date as may
be determined by the County Administrator, shall
be in denominations of $5,000 and integral
multiples thereof and shall be numbered R-1
upward. Subject to the provisions and
limitations of this Resolution, the Board
authorizes the County Administrator to undertake
the issuance and sale of the Bonds and to
determine the final pricing terms of the Bonds as
he shall deem to be in the best interests of the
County; provided, however, that the Bonds shall
(i) be issued in an aggregate principal amount
not exceeding the limit set forth in Section 1,
(ii) have a “true” or “Canadian” interest cost
not to exceed 6.00% (taking into account any
original issue discount or premium), (iii) be
6/24/2026 Page 34 of 98
sold at a price not less than 95% of the original
aggregate principal amount thereof (excluding any
original issue discount or premium), and (iv)
mature, or be subject to mandatory sinking fund
redemption in annual installments, in years
ending no later than December 31, 2056.
(b) Principal of the Bonds shall be payable
annually on dates determined by the County
Administrator. Each Bond shall bear interest
from its date at such rate as shall be determined
at the time of sale, calculated on the basis of a
360-day year of twelve 30-day months, payable
semiannually on dates determined by the County
Administrator. Principal and premium, if any,
shall be payable to the registered owners upon
surrender of Bonds as they become due at the
office of the Registrar (as hereinafter
defined). Interest shall be payable by check or
draft mailed to the registered owners at their
addresses as they appear on the registration
books kept by the Registrar on a date prior to
each interest payment date that shall be
determined by the County Administrator (the
“Record Date”); provided, however, that at the
request of the registered owner of the Bonds,
payment may be made by wire transfer pursuant to
the most recent wire instructions received by the
Registrar from such registered owner. If any
payment date with respect to the Bonds is not a
Business Day (as hereinafter defined), such
payment shall be made on the next succeeding
Business Day with the same effect as if made on
the stated payment date and no additional
interest shall accrue. “Business Day” shall mean
a day on which banking business is transacted,
but not including a Saturday, Sunday or legal
holiday, or any other day on which banking
institutions are authorized by law to close in
the Commonwealth of Virginia. Principal,
premium, if any, and interest shall be payable in
lawful money of the United States of America.
(c) Initially, one Bond certificate for each
maturity of the Bonds shall be issued to and
registered in the name of The Depository Trust
Company (“DTC”) or its nominee. The County has
heretofore entered into a Letter of
Representations relating to a book-entry system
to be maintained by DTC with respect to the
Bonds. “Securities Depository” shall mean DTC or
any other securities depository for the Bonds
appointed pursuant to Subsection 2(d).
(d) In the event that (i) the Securities
Depository determines not to continue to act as
the securities depository for the Bonds by giving
notice to the Registrar, and the County
discharges the Securities Depository of its
responsibilities with respect to the Bonds, or
(ii) the County in its sole discretion determines
(A) that beneficial owners of the Bonds shall be
able to obtain certificated Bonds or (B) to
6/24/2026 Page 35 of 98
select a new Securities Depository, then its
Deputy County Administrator for Finance and
Administration or Director of Budget and
Management, either of whom may act, shall, at the
direction of the County, attempt to locate
another qualified securities depository to serve
as Securities Depository and authenticate and
deliver certificated Bonds to the new Securities
Depository or its nominee, or authenticate and
deliver certificated Bonds to the beneficial
owners or to the Securities Depository
participants on behalf of beneficial owners
substantially in the form provided for in Section
5; provided, however, that such form shall
provide for interest on the Bonds to be payable
(X) from the date of the Bonds if they are
authenticated prior to the first interest payment
date or (Y) otherwise from the interest payment
date that is or immediately precedes the date on
which the Bonds are authenticated (unless payment
of interest thereon is in default, in which case
interest on such Bonds shall be payable from the
date to which interest has been paid). In
delivering certificated Bonds, the Deputy County
Administrator for Finance and Administration or
Director of Budget and Management, either of whom
may act, shall be entitled to rely on the records
of the Securities Depository as to the beneficial
owners or the records of the Securities
Depository participants acting on behalf of
beneficial owners. Such certificated Bonds will
then be registrable, transferable and
exchangeable as set forth in Section 7.
(e) So long as there is a Securities
Depository for the Bonds, (i) it or its nominee
shall be the registered owner of the Bonds, (ii)
notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Resolution, determinations of persons entitled to
payment of principal, premium, if any, and
interest, transfers of ownership and exchanges
and receipt of notices shall be the
responsibility of the Securities Depository and
shall be effected pursuant to rules and
procedures established by such Securities
Depository, (iii) the Registrar and the County
shall not be responsible or liable for
maintaining, supervising or reviewing the records
maintained by the Securities Depository, its
participants or persons acting through such
participants, (iv) references in this Resolution
to registered owners of the Bonds shall mean such
Securities Depository or its nominee and shall
not mean the beneficial owners of the Bonds and
(v) in the event of any inconsistency between the
provisions of this Resolution and the provisions
of the above-referenced Letter of Representations
such provisions of the Letter of Representations,
except to the extent set forth in this paragraph
and Subsection 2(d), shall control.
3. Redemption Provisions.
6/24/2026 Page 36 of 98
(a) Subject to the limitations contained
herein, the County Administrator is authorized to
determine the redemption provisions of the Bonds,
including provisions for optional, extraordinary
and mandatory sinking fund redemption.
(b) The Bonds may be subject to redemption
prior to maturity at the option of the County at
any time on or after the dates, if any,
determined by the County Administrator, in whole
or in part, at redemption price(s) that the
County Administrator determines to be in the best
interests of the County based on financial market
conditions, together with any interest accrued to
the date fixed for redemption. Such redemption
price terms may include traditional redemption
prices not to exceed 102% of the principal amount
to be redeemed as well as “make whole” redemption
prices.
(c) Any Bonds sold as term bonds may be
subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption upon
terms determined by the County Administrator.
(d) If less than all of the Bonds are called
for redemption, the maturities of the Bonds (or
principal portions thereof) to be redeemed shall
be selected by the Deputy County Administrator
for Finance and Administration or Director of
Budget and Management, either of whom may act, in
such manner as such officer may determine to be
in the best interests of the County. If less
than all of the Bonds of a particular maturity
are called for redemption, the Bonds (or portions
thereof) within such maturity to be redeemed
shall be selected by the Securities Depository
pursuant to its rules and procedures or, if the
book-entry system is discontinued, shall be
selected by the Registrar by lot in such manner
as the Registrar in its discretion may
determine. In either case, (i) the portion of
any Bond to be redeemed shall be in the principal
amount of $5,000 or some integral multiple
thereof and (ii) in selecting Bonds for
redemption, each Bond shall be considered as
representing that number of Bonds that is
obtained by dividing the principal amount of such
Bond by $5,000. The County shall cause notice of
the call for redemption identifying the Bonds or
portions thereof to be redeemed to be sent by
facsimile or electronic transmission, registered
or certified mail or overnight express delivery,
not less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior to
the date fixed for redemption, to the registered
owner(s) of the Bonds. The County shall not be
responsible for giving notice of redemption to
anyone other than DTC or another qualified
securities depository then serving or its nominee
unless no qualified securities depository is the
registered owner(s) of the Bonds. If no
qualified securities depository is the registered
owner of the Bonds, notice of redemption shall be
mailed to the registered owners of the Bonds. If
6/24/2026 Page 37 of 98
a portion of a Bond is called for redemption, a
new Bond in principal amount equal to the
unredeemed portion thereof will be issued to the
registered owner upon the surrender thereof.
(e) In the case of an optional redemption, the
notice may state that (i) it is conditioned upon
the deposit of moneys, in an amount equal to the
amount necessary to effect the redemption, no
later than the date fixed for redemption or (ii)
the County retains the right to rescind such
notice on or prior to the date fixed for
redemption (in either case, a “Conditional
Redemption”), and such notice and optional
redemption shall be of no effect if such moneys
are not so deposited or if the notice is
rescinded as described herein. Any Conditional
Redemption may be rescinded at any time. The
County shall give prompt notice of such
rescission to the affected bondholders. Any
Bonds subject to Conditional Redemption where
redemption has been rescinded shall remain
outstanding, and the rescission shall not
constitute an event of default. Further, in the
case of a Conditional Redemption, the failure of
the County to make funds available on or before
the date fixed for redemption shall not
constitute an event of default, and the County
shall give immediate notice to all organizations
registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “SEC”) as securities depositories
or the affected bondholders that the redemption
did not occur and that the Bonds called for
redemption and not so paid remain outstanding.
4. Execution and Authentication. The Bonds
shall be signed by the manual or facsimile
signature of the Chair or Vice Chair of the Board,
and the Board’s seal shall be affixed thereto, or a
facsimile thereof printed thereon, and shall be
attested by the manual or facsimile signature of
the Clerk or Deputy Clerk of the Board; provided,
however, that no Bond signed by facsimile
signatures shall be valid until it has been
authenticated by the manual signature of the
Registrar or, if a bank has been appointed
registrar pursuant to Section 7, an authorized
officer or employee of the Registrar and the date
of authentication noted thereon.
5. Bond Form. The Bonds shall be in
substantially the form of Exhibit A attached
hereto, with such completions, omissions,
insertions and changes not inconsistent with this
Resolution as may be approved by the officers
signing the Bonds, whose approval shall be
evidenced conclusively by the execution and
delivery of the Bonds.
6. Pledge of Full Faith and Credit. The full
faith and credit of the County are irrevocably
pledged for the payment of principal of and
premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds. Unless
6/24/2026 Page 38 of 98
other funds are lawfully available and appropriated
for timely payment of the Bonds, the Board shall
levy and collect an annual ad valorem tax, over and
above all other taxes authorized or limited by law
and without limitation as to rate or amount, on all
locally taxable property in the County sufficient
to pay when due the principal of and premium, if
any, and interest on the Bonds.
7. Registration, Transfer and Owners of Bonds.
(a) The County Treasurer is hereby appointed
paying agent and registrar for the Bonds (the
“Registrar”). The County Administrator is
authorized, on behalf of the County, to appoint a
qualified bank or trust company as successor
paying agent and registrar for the Bonds if at
any time the County Administrator determines such
appointment to be in the best interests of the
County. The Registrar shall maintain
registration books for the registration of the
Bonds and transfers thereof. Upon presentation
and surrender of any Bonds to the Registrar, or
its corporate trust office if the Registrar is a
bank or trust company, together with an
assignment duly executed by the registered owner
or the owner’s duly authorized attorney or legal
representative in such form as shall be
satisfactory to the Registrar, the County shall
execute, and the Registrar shall authenticate, if
required by Section 4, and deliver in exchange, a
new Bond or Bonds having an equal aggregate
principal amount, in authorized denominations, of
the same form and maturity, bearing interest at
the same rate, and registered in the name(s) as
requested by the then registered owner or the
owner’s duly authorized attorney or legal
representative. Any such exchange shall be at
the expense of the County, except that the
Registrar may charge the person requesting such
exchange the amount of any tax or other
governmental charge required to be paid with
respect thereto.
(b) The Registrar shall treat the registered
owner as the person exclusively entitled to
payment of principal, premium, if any, and
interest and the exercise of all other rights and
powers of the owner, except that interest
payments shall be made to the person shown as
owner on the registration books on the applicable
Record Date.
8. Sale of Bonds. The Board approves the
following terms of the sale of the Bonds:
(a) The Bonds shall be sold through a
competitive sale or a negotiated sale, as the
County Administrator, in collaboration with the
Financial Advisor, determines to be in the best
interests of the County.
6/24/2026 Page 39 of 98
(b) If the County Administrator determines
that the Bonds shall be sold by competitive sale,
the County Administrator is authorized to receive
bids for such Bonds and award such Bonds to the
bidder(s) providing the lowest “true” or
“Canadian” interest cost, subject to the
limitations set forth in Sections 1 and
2. Following a competitive sale, the County
Administrator shall file a certificate with the
Clerk of the Board setting forth the final terms
of the Bonds. The actions of the County
Administrator in selling the Bonds by competitive
sale shall be conclusive, and no further action
with respect to the sale and issuance of the
Bonds shall be necessary on the part of the
Board.
If the Bonds are sold by competitive sale, the
County Administrator, in collaboration with the
Financial Advisor, is authorized and directed to
take all proper steps to advertise the Bonds for
sale in accordance with the terms and conditions
as shall be provided in the notice of sale
relating to the Bonds. The County Administrator
is further authorized to cause to be prepared and
disseminated a notice of sale of the Bonds in
such form and containing such terms and
conditions as the County Administrator may deem
advisable, subject to the provisions of this
Resolution.
(c) If the County Administrator determines
that the Bonds shall be sold by negotiated sale,
the County Administrator is authorized, in
collaboration with the Financial Advisor, to
choose one or more investment banks or firms to
serve as underwriter(s) for the Bonds and to
execute and deliver to the underwriter(s) a bond
purchase agreement (the “Bond Purchase
Agreement”) in a form to be approved by the
County Administrator in consultation with the
County Attorney and the County’s bond
counsel. The execution of the Bond Purchase
Agreement by the County Administrator shall
constitute conclusive evidence of his approval
thereof. Following a negotiated sale, the County
Administrator shall file a copy of the Bond
Purchase Agreement with the records of the
Board. The actions of the County Administrator
in selling the Bonds by negotiated sale to the
underwriter(s) shall be conclusive, and no
further action with respect to the sale and
issuance of the Bonds shall be necessary on the
part of the Board.
9. Approval of Preparation and Execution of Official Statement.
(a) The County Administrator and other
appropriate officials and employees of the County
are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and
distribute, or cause to be prepared and
distributed, to prospective purchasers of the
6/24/2026 Page 40 of 98
Bonds a Preliminary Official Statement (the
“Preliminary Official Statement”) describing the
Bonds and the County in a form consistent with
the provisions of this Resolution. All actions
taken by the County Administrator and such other
officials and employees of the County with
respect to the preparation and distribution of
the Preliminary Official Statement are hereby
ratified and confirmed.
(b) The County Administrator and other
appropriate officials and employees of the County
are hereby authorized and directed to prepare, or
cause to be prepared, a final Official Statement
(the “Official Statement”), which shall be in
substantially the form of the Preliminary
Official Statement with such completions,
omissions, insertions and changes as are
necessary to complete the Official Statement and
deem it final for purposes of Rule 15c-12 (the
“Rule”) of the SEC.
(c) The County Administrator is hereby
authorized and directed to execute and deliver to
the underwriter(s) of the Bonds the final
Official Statement. The County shall arrange for
the delivery to the underwriter(s) of the Bonds
of a reasonable number of printed copies of the
final Official Statement, within seven business
days after the Bonds have been sold, for delivery
to each potential investor requesting a copy of
the Official Statement and to each person to whom
the underwriter(s) initially sells Bonds.
10. Official Statement. The draft Preliminary
Official Statement describing the Bonds, copies of
which have been made available to the Board prior
to this meeting, is hereby approved as the form of
the Preliminary Official Statement by which the
Bonds may be offered for sale to the public;
provided that the County Administrator, in
collaboration with the Financial Advisor, may make
such completions, omissions, insertions and changes
in the Preliminary Official Statement not
inconsistent with this Resolution as the County
Administrator may consider to be in the best
interests of the County. After the Bonds have been
sold, the County Administrator, in collaboration
with the Financial Advisor, shall make such
completions, omissions, insertions and changes in
the Preliminary Official Statement not inconsistent
with this Resolution as are necessary or desirable
to complete it as a final Official Statement. In
addition, the County shall arrange for the delivery
to the underwriter(s) of the Bonds of a reasonable
number of printed copies of the final Official
Statement, within seven business days after the
Bonds have been sold, for delivery to each
potential investor requesting a copy of the
Official Statement and to each person to whom the
underwriter(s) initially sells Bonds.
6/24/2026 Page 41 of 98
11. Official Statement Deemed Final. The County
Administrator is authorized, on behalf of the
County, to deem the Preliminary Official Statement
and the Official Statement in final form, each to
be final as of its date within the meaning of the
Rule, except for the omission from the Preliminary
Official Statement of certain pricing and other
information permitted to be omitted pursuant to the
Rule. The distribution of the Preliminary Official
Statement and the execution and delivery of the
Official Statement in final form shall be
conclusive evidence that each has been deemed final
as of its date by the County, except for the
omission in the Preliminary Official Statement of
such pricing and other information permitted to be
omitted pursuant to the Rule.
12. Preparation and Delivery of Bonds. After
the Bonds have been awarded, the Chair or Vice
Chair and the Clerk or Deputy Clerk of the Board
are authorized and directed to take all proper
steps to have the Bonds prepared and executed in
accordance with their terms and to deliver the
Bonds to the underwriter(s) thereof upon payment
therefor.
13. Arbitrage Covenants. The County covenants
that it shall not take or omit to take any action
the taking or omission of which will cause any of
the Bonds to be “arbitrage bonds” (within the
meaning of Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended, and regulations issued
pursuant thereto (the “Code”)), or otherwise cause
interest on any of the Bonds to be includable in
the gross income for federal income tax purposes of
the registered owners thereof under existing
law. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, the County shall comply with any
provision of law that may require the County at any
time to rebate to the United States any part of the
earnings derived from the investment of the gross
proceeds of the Bonds, unless the County receives
an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel
that such compliance is not required to prevent
interest on any of the Bonds from being includable
in the gross income for federal income tax purposes
of the registered owners thereof under existing
law. The County shall pay any such required rebate
from its legally available funds.
14. Non-Arbitrage Certificate and Elections. Such officers of the County as may be
requested by the County’s bond counsel are
authorized and directed to execute an appropriate
certificate setting forth (a) the expected uses and
investment of the proceeds of the Bonds in order to
show that such expected uses and investment will
not violate the provisions of Section 148 of the
Code and (b) any elections such officers deem
desirable regarding rebate of earnings to the
United States for purposes of complying with
Section 148 of the Code. Such certificate shall be
prepared in consultation with the County’s bond
6/24/2026 Page 42 of 98
counsel, and such elections shall be made after
consultation with bond counsel.
15. Limitation on Private Use. The County
covenants that it shall not permit the proceeds of
the Bonds or the facilities financed therewith to
be used in any manner that would result in (a) 5%
or more of such proceeds or facilities being used
in a trade or business carried on by any person
other than a governmental unit, as provided in
Section 141(b) of the Code, (b) 5% or more of such
proceeds or facilities being used with respect to
any output facility (other than a facility for the
furnishing of water), within the meaning of Section
141(b)(4) of the Code, or (c) 5% or more of such
proceeds being used directly or indirectly to make
or finance loans to any persons other than a
governmental unit, as provided in Section 141(c) of
the Code; provided, however, that if the County
receives an opinion of nationally recognized bond
counsel that any such covenants need not be
complied with to prevent the interest on any of the
Bonds from being includable in the gross income for
federal income tax purposes of the registered
owners thereof under existing law, the County need
not comply with such covenants.
16. Continuing Disclosure Agreement. The Chair
and Vice Chair of the Board and the County
Administrator, any of whom may act, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute a continuing
disclosure agreement (the “Continuing Disclosure
Agreement”) setting forth the reports and notices
to be filed by the County and containing such
covenants as may be necessary to assist the
underwriter(s) of the Bonds in complying with the
provisions of the Rule promulgated by the SEC. The
Continuing Disclosure Agreement shall be
substantially in the form of the County’s prior
continuing disclosure agreements, which is hereby
approved for purposes of the Bonds, provided that
the County Administrator, in collaboration with the
Financial Advisor, may make such changes in the
Continuing Disclosure Agreement not inconsistent
with this Resolution and the Rule as the County
Administrator may determine to be in the best
interests of the County. The execution thereof by
such officers shall constitute conclusive evidence
of their approval of any such completions,
omissions, insertions and changes.
17. Deposit of Bond Proceeds. The County
Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to
provide for delivery of the proceeds of the Bonds
to or at the direction of the County in such manner
as necessary to pay costs of the Projects and
related costs of issuance.
18. SNAP Investment Authorization. The County
has previously received and reviewed the
Information Statement describing the State Non-
Arbitrage Program of the Commonwealth of Virginia
(“SNAP”) and the Contract Creating the State Non-
6/24/2026 Page 43 of 98
Arbitrage Program Pool (the “Contract”), and the
Board hereby authorizes the County Treasurer in her
discretion to use SNAP in connection with the
investment of the proceeds of the Bonds. The Board
acknowledges that the Treasury Board of the
Commonwealth of Virginia is not, and shall not be,
in any way liable to the County in connection with
SNAP, except as otherwise provided in the Contract.
19. Reimbursement of Expenditures. The County
intends that the proceeds of the Bonds may be used
to reimburse expenditures for the Projects made
prior to the date hereof. As such, the County
intends that the adoption of this Resolution
confirms the “official intent” within the meaning
of Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2 promulgated
under the Code.
20. Other Actions. All other actions of
officers of the County and the Board in conformity
with the purposes and intent of this Resolution and
in furtherance of the issuance and sale of the
Bonds and the financing of the Projects are hereby
ratified, approved and confirmed. The officers of
the County are hereby authorized and directed to
execute and deliver all certificates and
instruments and to take all such further action as
may be considered necessary or desirable in
connection with the issuance, sale and delivery of
the Bonds and the financing of the Projects.
21. Repeal of Conflicting Resolutions. All
resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict
herewith are repealed.
22. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take
effect immediately.
And, further, the Board adopted the following
resolution:
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PLAN TO FINANCE CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR GOVERNMENTAL PURPOSES THROUGH THE ISSUANCE OF PUBLIC FACILITY REVENUE BONDS BY THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority of the
County of Chesterfield (the “Authority”), pursuant to
the Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act,
Chapter 49, Title 15.2, Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended (the “IDA Act”), under which it was created,
is authorized to exercise all the powers set forth in
the IDA Act, which include, among other things, the
power to make loans to, among others, a county in
furtherance of the purposes of the IDA Act, to
finance or refinance facilities for use by, among
others, a county, to issue its revenue bonds, notes
and other obligations from time to time for such
purposes and to pledge all or any part of its
revenues and receipts derived from payments received
by the Authority in connection with its loans or from
any other source, as security for the payment of the
6/24/2026 Page 44 of 98
principal of and premium, if any, and interest on any
such obligations;
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the “Board of
Supervisors”) of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia
(the “County”), desires to undertake, in conjunction
with the Authority, the financing of the costs of
capital improvements for governmental purposes,
including but not limited to (a) improving,
equipping, renovating and expanding various
governmental buildings and facilities and (b)
undertaking major maintenance for school buildings
and facilities (collectively, the “2026B Project”);
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to request
the Authority to issue a series of public facility
revenue bonds (as hereinafter described, the “2026B
Bonds”) and loan the proceeds thereof to the County
to finance the 2026B Project and to pay the related
costs of issuance;
WHEREAS, the 2026B Bonds will be secured by payments
appropriated from time to time by the Board of
Supervisors and payable to the Authority in
accordance with the terms of the Financing Agreement
(as hereinafter defined);
WHEREAS, there have been circulated prior to this
meeting drafts of the following documents
(collectively, the “Documents”) proposed to be
executed in connection with the issuance and sale of
the 2026B Bonds:
(a) A Third Supplemental Agreement of Trust,
supplementing the Agreement of Trust dated as of
August 1, 2019, as previously supplemented
(collectively, the “Trust Agreement”), all between
the Authority and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National
Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), pursuant
to which the 2026B Bonds are to be issued;
(b) A Second Supplemental Financing Agreement
(the “Supplemental Financing Agreement”),
supplementing a Financing Agreement dated as of
August 1, 2019 (collectively, the “Financing
Agreement”), all between the Authority and the
County, pursuant to which the Authority will loan
the proceeds of the 2026B Bonds to the County and
the County will undertake, subject to
appropriation, to make payments to the Authority in
amounts sufficient to pay the principal of and
premium, if any, and interest on the 2026B Bonds
and certain other related costs;
(c) A Preliminary Official Statement of the
Authority relating to the public offering of the
2026B Bonds (the “Preliminary Official Statement”);
(d) A Notice of Sale (attached as an appendix to
the Preliminary Official Statement) (the “Notice of
Sale”) (applicable only if the 2026B Bonds are sold
through a competitive sale); and
6/24/2026 Page 45 of 98
(e) A Continuing Disclosure Agreement (attached
as an appendix to the Preliminary Official
Statement), pursuant to which the County agrees to
undertake certain continuing disclosure obligations
with respect to the 2026B Bonds;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board of Supervisors hereby finds that
the undertaking of the 2026B Project will be in the
best interests of the County and its citizens and
hereby authorizes the County, in collaboration with
the Authority, to undertake the following plan of
finance to accomplish the same. The Authority will
issue the 2026B Bonds in an aggregate principal
amount not to exceed $50,000,000. The Authority
will loan the proceeds of the 2026B Bonds to the
County to finance the 2026B Project and to pay the
related costs of issuance. Pursuant to the
Financing Agreement, the County will undertake to
make certain Basic Payments and Additional Payments
(each as defined in the Financing Agreement) to the
Authority in amounts sufficient to amortize the
2026B Bonds, to pay the fees or expenses of the
Authority and the Trustee and to pay certain other
related costs. The obligation of the Authority to
pay principal of and premium, if any, and interest
on the 2026B Bonds will be limited to the Basic
Payments and certain Additional Payments received
from the County. The 2026B Bonds will be secured
by an assignment of the Basic Payments and certain
Additional Payments due under the Financing
Agreement, all for the benefit of the holders of
the 2026B Bonds. The undertaking by the County to
make Basic Payments and Additional Payments will be
subject to the appropriation by the Board of
Supervisors from time to time of sufficient amounts
for such purposes. The plan of finance for the
2026B Project shall contain such additional
requirements and provisions as may be approved by
the County Administrator (such term as used herein
to include the County Administrator and any acting
or interim County Administrator and the Deputy
County Administrator for Finance and
Administration) and the Chair or Vice-Chair of the
Authority.
2. While recognizing that it is not empowered to
make any binding commitment to make appropriations
beyond the current fiscal year, the Board of
Supervisors hereby states its intention to (a) make
appropriations in future fiscal years in amounts
sufficient to make all payments due under the
Financing Agreement and recommends that future
Boards of Supervisors do likewise during the term
of the Financing Agreement. The Board of
Supervisors hereby confirms that the components of
the 2026B Project are either essential to the
efficient operation of the County or important to
the welfare or quality of life of the citizens of
the County, and the Board of Supervisors
anticipates that such components will continue to
be so during the term of the Financing
6/24/2026 Page 46 of 98
Agreement. Nothing in this Resolution or in the
Financing Agreement shall constitute a debt of the
County within the meaning of any constitutional or
statutory limitation or a pledge of the faith and
credit or taxing power of the County.
3. The Chair and Vice Chair of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator, any of
whom may act, are hereby authorized and directed to
execute the Documents to which the County is a
signatory, which shall be in substantially the
forms circulated prior to this meeting. Such forms
of the Documents are hereby approved, with such
completions, omissions, insertions and changes not
inconsistent with this Resolution as may be
approved by the officer signing such Documents,
whose execution and delivery thereof shall
constitute conclusive evidence of such officer’s
approval of any such completions, omissions,
insertions and changes.
4. In making completions to the Supplemental
Financing Agreement, the County Administrator, in
collaboration with Davenport & Company LLC, the
County’s financial advisor (the “Financial
Advisor”), and the Authority, shall provide for
Basic Payments in amounts equivalent to the
payments of principal of and interest on the 2026B
Bonds, which shall be sold to the underwriter(s)
thereof on terms as shall be satisfactory to the
County Administrator; provided that the Basic
Payments shall be equivalent to the 2026B Bonds,
which shall (a) mature or be subject to mandatory
sinking fund redemption in annual installments
ending no later than December 31, 2056; (b) have a
“true” or “Canadian” interest cost not exceeding
6.00% (taking into account any original issue
discount or premium); (c) be subject to optional
redemption, if at all, at a premium not to exceed
2.00% of the principal amount thereof; and (d) be
sold to the underwriter(s) thereof at a price not
less than 95% of the aggregate principal amount
thereof (without taking into account any original
issue discount or premium). The County
Administrator, in collaboration with the Chair and
Vice-Chair of the Authority, is also authorized to
approve a lesser principal amount for the 2026B
Bonds, a maturity schedule (including serial
maturities and term maturities for the 2026B Bonds)
and the redemption provisions of the 2026B Bonds,
all as the County Administrator shall determine to
be in the best interest of the County and the
Authority.
5. The Board of Supervisors approves the
following terms of the sale of the 2026B Bonds.
(a) The 2026B Bonds shall be sold through
either a competitive sale or a negotiated sale,
as the County Administrator, in collaboration
with the Financial Advisor and the Authority,
determines to be in the best interests of the
County.
6/24/2026 Page 47 of 98
(b) If the County Administrator determines
that the 2026B Bonds shall be sold by competitive
sale, the County Administrator is authorized to
receive public bids for the 2026B Bonds and to
award the 2026B Bonds to the bidder(s) providing
the lowest “true” or “Canadian” interest cost,
subject to the limitations set forth in Section
4. Following a competitive sale, the County
Administrator shall file a certificate with the
Authority and the Board of Supervisors setting
forth the final terms of the 2026B Bonds. The
actions of the County Administrator in selling
the 2026B Bonds by competitive sale shall be
conclusive, and no further action with respect to
the sale and issuance of the 2026B Bonds shall be
necessary on the part of the Board of
Supervisors.
If the 2026B Bonds are sold by competitive bid,
the County Administrator, on behalf of the
Authority and in collaboration with the Financial
Advisor, is authorized and directed to take all
proper steps to advertise the 2026B Bonds for
sale substantially in accordance with the form of
the Notice of Sale, which is hereby approved;
provided that the County Administrator, in
collaboration with the Financial Advisor, may
make such changes in the Notice of Sale not
inconsistent with this Resolution as he may
consider to be in the best interests of the
County.
(c) If the County Administrator determines
that the 2026B Bonds shall be sold by negotiated
sale, the County Administrator is authorized, on
behalf of the Authority and in collaboration with
the Financial Advisor, to choose one or more
investment banks or firms to serve as
underwriter(s) for the 2026B Bonds and to execute
and deliver to the underwriter(s) a bond purchase
agreement (the “Bond Purchase Agreement”) in a
form to be approved by the County Administrator
and the County Attorney, in consultation with the
County’s bond counsel and the Financial
Advisor. Following a negotiated sale, the County
Administrator shall file a copy of the Bond
Purchase Agreement with the records of the Board
of Supervisors. The actions of the County
Administrator in selling the 2026B Bonds by
negotiated sale to the underwriter(s) shall be
conclusive, and no further action with respect to
the sale and issuance of the 2026B Bonds shall be
necessary on the part of the Board of
Supervisors.
6. The Preliminary Official Statement in the
form circulated prior to this meeting is approved
with respect to the information contained therein
(excluding information pertaining to the
Authority). The Board of Supervisors hereby
authorizes distribution of the Preliminary Official
Statement to prospective purchasers of the 2026B
6/24/2026 Page 48 of 98
Bonds in a form deemed to be “final” (within the
meaning of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Rule”)) as of its date,
except for the omission of certain pricing and
other information permitted to be omitted pursuant
to the Rule and with such completions, omissions,
insertions and changes not inconsistent with this
Resolution as may be approved by the County
Administrator. Such distribution shall constitute
conclusive evidence of the approval of the County
Administrator as to any such completions,
omissions, insertions and changes and that the
County has deemed the Preliminary Official
Statement to be “final” (within the meaning of the
Rule) as of its date, with respect to the
information therein pertaining to the County. The
County Administrator is authorized and directed to
approve such completions, omissions, insertions and
other changes to the Preliminary Official Statement
as are necessary to reflect the terms of the sale
of the 2026B Bonds, determined as set forth in
paragraph 4, and the details thereof and as are
appropriate to complete it as an official statement
in final form (the “Official Statement”) and to
execute such final Official Statement, and
distribution thereof to the underwriter(s) of the
2026B Bonds shall constitute conclusive evidence
that the County has deemed the Official Statement
“final” (within the meaning of the Rule) as of its
date. The County shall arrange for the delivery to
the underwriter(s) of the 2026B Bonds of a
reasonable number of printed copies of the final
Official Statement, within seven business days
after the 2026B Bonds have been sold, for delivery
to each potential investor requesting a copy of the
Official Statement and to each person to whom an
underwriter initially sells 2026B Bonds.
7. Such officers of the County as may be
requested by bond counsel for the County are
authorized and directed to execute an appropriate
certificate setting forth (a) the expected use and
investment of the proceeds of the 2026B Bonds in
order to show that such expected use and investment
will not violate the provisions of Section 148 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
“Code”), and (b) any elections such officers deem
desirable regarding rebate of earnings to the
United States for purposes of complying with
Section 148 of the Code. Such certificate shall be
prepared in consultation with bond counsel for the
County, and such elections shall be made after
consultation with bond counsel.
8. All costs and expenses incurred in connection
with the financing of the 2026B Project and the
issuance of the 2026B Bonds, including the
Authority’s fees and expenses and the fees and
expenses of bond counsel, counsel for the Authority
and the Financial Advisor for the sale of the 2026B
Bonds, shall be paid from the proceeds of the 2026B
Bonds or other legally available funds of the
County. If for any reason the 2026B Bonds are not
6/24/2026 Page 49 of 98
issued, it is understood that all such fees and
expenses shall be paid by the County from its
legally available funds and that the Authority
shall have no responsibility therefor.
9. The County intends that the proceeds of the
2026B Bonds may be used to reimburse expenditures
for the 2026B Project made prior to the date
hereof. As such, the County intends that the
adoption of this Resolution confirms the “official
intent” within the meaning of Treasury Regulations
Section 1.150-2 promulgated under the Code.
10. Any authorization herein to execute a
document shall include authorization to deliver it
to the other parties thereto.
11. All other acts of the County Administrator
and other officers of the County that are in
conformity with the purposes and intent of this
Resolution and in furtherance of the issuance and
sale of the 2026B Bonds and the financing of the
2026B Project are hereby approved and ratified.
12. This Resolution shall take effect
immediately.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
2. Real Property Requests
a. Acceptance of Parcels of Land
1. Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along
Bellwood Road From The Bellwood Road
Property, LLLP
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board accepted the conveyance of a parcel of land
containing 0.062 acres along Bellwood Road from The
Bellwood Road Property, LLLP, and authorized the
County Administrator to execute the deed.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
b. Requests for Permission
1. To Consider the Conveyance of an
Easement to Virginia Electric and
Power Company at Falling Creek
Ironworks Park
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board authorized the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute
an agreement with Virginia Electric and Power Company
for an overhead easement at Falling Creek Ironworks
Park.
6/24/2026 Page 50 of 98
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
3. Acceptance of State Roads
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the streets described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Old Hundred Mill Section E Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Additions Reason for Change: New Streets
Street Name and/or Route Number
Mill View Drive State Route Number: 4765
From: Mill Manor Drive, (Route 5398)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.04 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 314, Page 34
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
Mill View Drive State Route Number: 4765
From: 0.01 miles south of Waterwheel Drive, (Route
6021)
To: Mill Manor Drive (Route 5398), a distance of 0.15
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 314, Page 34
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
Mill Manor Drive State Route Number: 5398
From: 0.04 miles south of Mill Manor Court, (Route
5409)
To: Mill View Drive (Route 4765), a distance of 0.06
miles
6/24/2026 Page 51 of 98
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 314, Page 34
Right of Way width (feet) = 54
Mill Manor Drive State Route Number: 5398
From: Mill View Drive, (Route 4765)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.19 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 314, Page 34
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
And, further, the Board adopted the following
resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the streets described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Palisades Cove at Magnolia Green Section 3 Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Additions Reason for Change: New Streets
Street Name and/or Route Number
Palisades Ridge State Route Number: 8479
From: 0.01 miles north of Palisades Cove Drive,
(Route 8596)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.15 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 315, Page 96
Right of Way width (feet) = 48
Palisades Cove Trail State Route Number: 8597
From: 0.01 miles north of Palisades Cove Drive,
(Route 8596)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.14 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 315, Page 96
Right of Way width (feet) = 48
6/24/2026 Page 52 of 98
And, further, the Board adopted the following
resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on a
plat recorded in the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board
the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
add the streets described below to the secondary
system of state highways, pursuant to Sections 33.2-
705 and 33.2-334, Code of Virginia, and the
Department’s Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board
guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as
described, and any necessary easements for cuts,
fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer
for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project / Subdivision: Rivers Trace Section L Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways: Additions Reason for Change: New Streets
Street Name and/or Route Number
Corte Castle Road State Route Number: 4857
From: 0.02 miles west of Haggis Road, (Route 7287)
To: Hebrides Drive, (Route 8666), a distance of 0.27
miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 294, Page 30
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Hebrides Drive State Route Number: 8666
From: Corte Castle Road, (Route 4857)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.04 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 294, Page 30
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Hebrides Drive State Route Number: 8666
From: Corte Castle Road, (Route 4857)
To: The cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.06 miles
Recordation Reference: Plat Book 294, Page 30
Right of Way width (feet) = 50
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
4. Appropriation and Transfer of Funds and
Authorization to Proceed with the Salem Church
6/24/2026 Page 53 of 98
Road and Kingsland Road Roundabout, Chester Road
and Hamlin Creek Parkway Roundabout, and Old
Lane Improvement Projects
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board took the following actions:
1. Appropriation of anticipated VDOT reimbursements
in the amounts shown for the following projects:
a. Salem Church Road and Kingsland Road Roundabout
- $3,853,000
b. Chester Road and Hamlin Creek Parkway
Roundabout and Old Lane Improvement - $993,000
2. Transfer of General Road Improvement Account funds
in the amounts shown for the following projects:
a. Salem Church Road and Kingsland Road Roundabout
- $1,000,000
b. Chester Road and Hamlin Creek Parkway Roundabout
and Old Lane Improvement - $993,000
3. Granting of authorizations for the new projects
listed above:
a. Authorized the County Administrator to enter
into all appropriate agreements and contracts
acceptable to the County Attorney;
b. Authorized the County Administrator to proceed
with engineering, right-of-way acquisition,
including the advertisement for eminent domain
public hearings, if necessary, and to accept the
conveyance of right-of-way and easements that are
acquired;
c. Authorized the Chair of the Board of Supervisors
and County Administrator to execute easement
agreements for the relocation of utilities; and
d. Authorized the Procurement Director to proceed
with the advertisement for a construction contract.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
5. Appropriation of Funds and Authorization to
Award a Construction Contract for the Route 60
(Ruthers Road - Spring Rock Green) Sidewalk
Improvements Project
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board took the following actions for the Route 60
(Ruthers Road - Spring Rock Green) Sidewalk
Improvements Project:
1. Appropriated $1,542,000 in anticipated VDOT
reimbursements, contingent on the Richmond Regional
Transportation Planning Organization approval, or
transfer from the General Road Improvement Account;
and
2. Authorized the Director of Procurement to award a
construction contract to Muller, Incorporated in the
amount of $4,750,000 and to execute all necessary
change orders up to the full amount budgeted for the
project.
6/24/2026 Page 54 of 98
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
6. Approval of FY2026 Year-End Adjustments and
Reserve Requests
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board adopted FY2026 year-end revenue and expenditure
adjustments for the County as follows:
1. Authorized the County Administrator to assign to
a revenue stabilization reserve all unspent, or
otherwise unreserved, FY2026 appropriations that are
in excess of the items detailed in the attached
schedules;
2. Appropriated revenues and expenditures for
specific programs as well as authorized reallocations
among General Fund departments and related funds and
made adjustments to revenues and expenditures as
outlined on the attached FY2026 County - Schedule A.
3. Authorized the transfer of $4.0 million in
previously appropriated funds for the school bus
financing program from the Debt Service Fund to the
Schools Capital Projects Fund, where the related
project expenditures will be recorded, with no
increase to total FY2026 appropriations as outlined
on the attached FY2026 County – Schedule B.
4. Authorized the County Administrator to assign and
reappropriate various revenues and unspent
expenditures contingent upon positive results of
operations as determined by the County’s financial
audit, as outlined on the attached FY2026 County -
Schedule C, and reserve all remaining funds for
potential reappropriation during FY2026; additional
requests to commit remaining funds will be brought to
the Board of Supervisors following the financial
audit; and
5. Authorized a $1.0 million contribution to the
Unassigned Fund Balance to ensure adequate balances
within the policy guidelines prior to June 30, 2026.
And, further, the Board adopted FY2026 year-end
revenue and expenditure adjustments for Chesterfield
County Public Schools (CCPS) as follows:
1. Approved CCPS - Schedule A, including $2.2
million in expenditure appropriation reallocations
within the CCPS Operating Fund, with the exception of
the one-time state bonus funding described below;
2. Authorized receipt of one-time state bonus
funding of $6,868,530 for CCPS and $84,920 for ARGS.
Since CCPS anticipates utilizing the funds in FY2027,
the funding is not appropriated for FY2026
expenditure and will be reserved at year-end for
consideration and appropriation in FY2027;
3. Approved CCPS - Schedule B as presented, and add
the one-time state bonus funding described above to
6/24/2026 Page 55 of 98
Schedule B as a reserve for future FY2027
consideration and appropriation;
4. Approved CCPS - Schedule C as presented, except
that the one-time state bonus funding is not
authorized as a FY2026 expenditure appropriation or
carryforward through this action; and
5. Requested that any remaining ending balance based
on the final FY2026 audit be reserved for Future
School Needs in the General Fund.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
(It is noted a copy of the Schedules are filed with
the papers of this Board.)
7. Authorization of Receipt and Appropriation of
VDEM Virginia 9-1-1 Services Board Call Handling
Equipment Grant
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board authorized the acceptance and appropriation of
grant funds from the Virginia Department of Emergency
Management's 9-1-1 Services Board, Call Handling
Equipment Grant, in the amount of $400,000.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
8. Set Public Hearings for July 22, 2026
a. To Consider Approval of a Lease Renewal for
the United States General Services
Administration at Chesterfield County
Airport
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board set July 22, 2026, as the date to hold a public
hearing to consider a lease renewal for the United
States General Services Administration (GSA) at the
Chesterfield County Airport.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
b. To Consider an Ordinance to Amend the
County Code by Enacting Article XXIII,
Sections 9-302 Through 9-308, Relative to
the Creation of the Sawmill Station
Community Development Authority
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board set July 22, 2026, as the date to hold a public
hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the County
Code by enacting Article XXIII, Sections 9-302
through 9-308, relative to the Creation of the
Sawmill Station Community Development Authority.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
6/24/2026 Page 56 of 98
16. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
Thomas Kierl expressed concerns relative to the
growth in the county budget, increases in real estate
taxes, lack of infrastructure to support growth, and
the Shoosmith Landfill.
Lisa Thompson expressed concerns relative to the
harms caused by data centers and requested a
community meeting with Google to answer questions.
Kerry McAvoy asked the Board to place a moratorium on
additional data center projects until residents are
provided transparency, meaningful public involvement,
and comprehensive cumulative impact analyses.
Board members agreed to combine the two Fifteen-
Minute Citizen Comment Periods on Unscheduled
Matters, Items 16 and 20, into one comment period.
Mike Uzel expressed concerns relative to non-
disclosure agreements (NDA) and the Shoosmith
Landfill.
William Shewmake shared his ideas about how to reduce
the cost to remediate the Shoosmith Landfill and
address the issue with a leachate evaporation system.
Jerry Turner expressed his concerns relative to
Springline crosswalks and the perception that the
county does not pay its bills.
Renae Eldred addressed the Board relative to citizen
participation and the lack of citizens who
participated when the data center cases were before
the Board for consideration.
Sara Weidner expressed concerns relative to the Board
allowing the data center deals to be negotiated under
strict NDAs without public input and the harms data
centers may present.
Leah McElderry expressed concerns relative to data
center development moving forward without any public
knowledge, input or engagement.
Victoria Sagstetter expressed concerns relative to
data centers being so close to her home and schools.
17. Deferred Items from Previous Meetings
There were no deferred items from previous meetings.
18. Zoning Requests
A. 23SN0072 - Midlothian Microtel - Midlothian
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Midlothian
Microtel is a request to rezone from Agricultural (A)
to Corridor Commercial (CC) and amendment of zoning
district map on 2.57 acres known as 11213 Robious
Road. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
6/24/2026 Page 57 of 98
appropriate for Regional Mixed-Use. Tax IDs 742-713-
4750-00001; 742-713-4750-00002; 742-713-6185 and
6880.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
applicant has requested a deferral to the Board's
August 26, 2026, public hearing.
Dr. Miller called for public comment on the deferral.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing on the deferral was closed.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Dr. Hylton, the
Board deferred Case 23SN0072 to its August 26, 2026,
public hearing.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
B. 24SN1345 - Butler Setback and Buffer Exception -
Clover Hill
In the Clover Hill Magisterial District, Butler
Setback and Buffer Exception is a request for
conditional use planned development to permit
exceptions to ordinance requirements and amendment of
the zoning district map in a Semi-Urban Neighborhood
(SU) District known as 9600 Reams Road. The 5.82 acre
property is developed with one existing single family
dwelling and this request proposes a two-lot
subdivision of the property. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Residential
Neighborhood 4 use (4.0 units per acre or less). Tax
ID 750-701-8674.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Mr. Ingle,
the Board approved Case 24SN1345, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. Lot 1 Setback and Development Standards. Lot 1
shall comply with the Residential (R-7) District
standards except as specified below.
a. Existing Dwelling. The existing dwelling
shall adhere to the setbacks and development
standards shown on Exhibit A. Should the house be i)
demolished due to an act of God or ii) should the
house be demolished and reconstructed within the same
footprint, the following development standards shall
apply.
i. Front Yard Setback. The minimum
front yard setback for the existing dwelling shall be
6/24/2026 Page 58 of 98
no less than twenty-two (22) feet from South Arch
Road.
ii. Corner Side Yard Setback. The
minimum corner side yard setback for the existing
dwelling shall be no less than twenty-one (21) feet
from Reams Road.
iii. Arterial Buffers. No buffer
shall be required for the existing dwelling from
South Arch Road or Reams Road.
b. Dwelling Addition. Any future addition
to the existing dwelling shall be limited to a
maximum of 100 square feet and be located to the rear
or side of the existing dwelling. The addition shall
not extend any closer to Reams Road or North Arch
Road than the existing dwelling. (P)
2. Limitation of Exceptions for Lot 1. Should the
existing dwelling be demolished for any reason
including an act of God and the dwelling is expanded
beyond the lawful footprint existing at the time of
demolition or the property is redeveloped,
development on Lot 1 shall comply with the
Residential (R-7) District standards except as
outlined below:
a. Arterial Buffers. A fifty (50) foot
buffer from South Arch Road shall be provided on the
lot. No buffer shall be required along Reams Road.
b. Front Yard Setback. A twenty-five (25)
foot setback from South Arch Road, exclusive of the
buffer, shall be provided.
c. Corner Side Yard Setback. A minimum
twenty-five (25) foot setback shall be provided along
Reams Road. (P)
3. Lot 2 Development Standards. Lot 2 shall comply
with the Residential (R-7) District standards except
as specified below:
a. Front Yard Setback. A twenty-five (25)
foot setback from South Arch Road, exclusive of the
buffer, shall be provided. (P)
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
C. 25SN1121 - RaceTrac at Ruffin Mill Rezoning &
Adjustments - Bermuda
In Bermuda Magisterial District, RaceTrac at Ruffin
Mill Rezoning & Adjustments is a request to rezone
from Employment Center (EC), Agricultural (A), and
Corridor Commercial (CC) to Warehouse and
Distribution (WD) with conditional use to permit a
gas station with accessory tractor trailer fueling,
plus adjustments to ordinance requirements for
development standards and amendment of the zoning
district map on 11.31 acres located in the western
corner Ruffin Mill Road and Walthall Center Drive,
known as 2136 Ruffin Mill Road. The Comprehensive
Plan suggests the Property is appropriate for
Manufacturing and Processing uses. Tax IDs 804-638-
2156, 5183, 6768, and 8343.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
6/24/2026 Page 59 of 98
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
Jerry Turner expressed concerns relative to there not
being enough room for tractor trailers.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Dr. Hylton, the
Board approved Case 25SN1121, subject to the
following conditions:
Proffered Conditions
The Owner-Applicant in this rezoning Case 25SN1121
pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia
(1950 as amended) and the Chesterfield County,
Virginia (“County”) Code of Ordinances, Chapter 19.2
Zoning Ordinance Modernization (ZOMod), for itself
and its successor or assigns, proffers that the
development of the approximately 11.311+/- total
acres with County Tax Identification Numbers
804638676800000 (2136 Ruffin Mill Road; 4.211 acres);
804638834300000 (2301 Walthall Center Drive; 1.99
acres); 804638518300000 (2146 Ruffin Mill Road; 3.477
acres); 804638215600000 (2210 Ruffin Mill Road; 1.633
acres)(collectively, the “Property”) under
consideration will be developed as set forth below;
however, in the event the request is denied or
approved with conditions not agreed to by the
Owner/Applicant, these proffers shall be immediately
null and void and of no further force or effect.
The Applicant hereby proffers the following
conditions, applicable to the Property:
1. Exhibits. These proffers shall include the
following exhibits which by this reference are made a
part hereof:
a. Exhibit A – conceptual plan entitled,
“CONCEPTUAL PLAN, RUFFIN MILL ROAD AND WALTHALL
CENTER DRIVE, CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23834” prepared
by MLD Studio Landscape Architecture and dated April
10, 2026 attached hereto as Exhibit A (the
“Conceptual Plan”).
b. Exhibit B – conceptual renderings
entitled, “RACETRAC RUFFIN MILL, CHESTERFIELD VA
23834, RUFFIN MILL @ WALTHALL CENTER DR.” prepared by
GPD Group, Inc. dated March 3, 2025 attached hereto
as Exhibit B (the “Conceptual Renderings”). (P)
2. Design Guidelines. The site shall be designed
in general conformance with the Conceptual Plan
(Exhibit A) and Conceptual Renderings (Exhibit B),
provided the exact number, location and style of
buildings, drive areas, parking areas, and other
improvements shown on the Conceptual Plan (Exhibit A)
and Conceptual Renderings (Exhibit B) are conceptual
in nature and may vary in detail as required for
final approval at the time of plans review. (P)
3. Permitted Uses. In addition to all uses
6/24/2026 Page 60 of 98
permitted by right or with restrictions in the
Warehouse and Distribution (WD) District, a gas
station and convenience store with accessory tractor
trailer fueling shall also be permitted on the
Property. (P)
4. Prohibited Use. The following uses or
activities shall not be permitted on the Property:
a. Tractor-trailer repair and maintenance
services;
b. Overnight tractor-trailer parking.
(Note: This shall not preclude tractor trailers from
briefly stopping during nighttime hours for on-site
commercial purposes, such as refueling, making
deliveries, or patronizing the convenience store,
provided that such tractor trailers do not remain
parked overnight);
c. Daytime tractor-trailer parking for more
than 4 hours;
d. Dropping of trailers;
e. Power shoring or other electrical
hookups that incentivize long-term parking for
tractor trailers;
f. Shower facilities;
g. Laundry services;
h. Storage, outside; and
i. Commercial Contractors/Services, with
outside storage and/or fleet parking. (P)
5. Parking. Tractor-trailer parking spaces shall
be limited to a maximum of six (6) parking spaces.
(P)
6. Utilities. Public water and wastewater systems
shall be used. (U)
7. Vehicular Access. Access to Ruffin Mill Road
shall be limited to one (1) right-in only access with
the exact design and location approved by the
Transportation Department, if approved by the
Virginia Department of Transportation (“VDOT”). (T)
8. Road Improvements.
a. Construction of additional pavement
along southbound Ruffin Mill Road to provide a
separate right turn lane at the approved right-in
only vehicular access, if vehicular access is
approved by VDOT;
b. Construction of additional pavement
along the southbound lanes of Ruffin Mill Road to
provide a separate right turn lane at the Walthall
Center Drive intersection;
c. Construction of additional pavement
along Walthall Center Drive at the Ruffin Mill Road
intersection to provide a four (4)-lane typical
section (1 inbound lane and 3 outbound lanes), with
any modifications approved by the Transportation
Department;
d. Traffic signal modifications at the
Ruffin Mill Road and Walthall Center Drive
intersection as required to accommodate road
improvements; and
6/24/2026 Page 61 of 98
e. Dedication to Chesterfield County, free
and unrestricted, of any additional right-of-way (or
easements) required for the improvements identified
above. (T)
9. Security.
a. High visibility pictographic video
surveillance signs shall be posted on exterior
customer doors and parking lot light poles.
b. Window and door advertisements (e.g.,
decals, “clings,” posters, banners, flags, etc.)
shall only be permitted if placed below the height of
the main entrance door handles. This shall not apply
to “faux”/decorative windows.
c. Video management system shall meet the
following criteria:
i. NDAA compliant and/or FIPS
validated
ii. IP-based
iii. 1080p exterior cameras
iv. 1080p interior cameras
v. Minimum 30-day video retention
vi. 24-hour operation
vii. On-site video monitor
viii. Proprietary and non-
proprietary video (export) formats
ix. System shall be capable of
interfacing with Axon/Fusus.
d. Full-lite exterior building doors shall
utilize laminated glass construction that meets UL
972 standard for Burglary Resisting Glazing Material
or doors shall include a professionally installed,
minimum 10-mil-thick break resistant film.
e. At time of site plan submission,
applicant shall provide CCPD’s CPTED Planner a
security plan which details:
i. Security alarm system
manufacturer and model information, system
specifications/details, duress capabilities, and
monitoring center information
ii. Exterior and interior video
surveillance camera locations and viewing angles; and
iii. Security camera cut sheets.
f. Existing and proposed tree locations
shall be indicated on the lighting/photometric plan.
(Police)
10. Lighting.
a. Full cut-off, photocell-activated, LED
luminaires shall illuminate on-site sidewalks and
parking with a minimum maintained illumination level
of 3.0 foot-candles, as measured at grade.
b. Light poles shall not be located
within twenty feet (20’) of large maturing shade
trees currently existing as of the date of zoning
approval for this request. (Police)
11. Landscaping. Building foundation plantings
shall not have natural, mature growth habits that
exceed three feet (3’) in height. (P)
12. Building Materials. Development of a gas
station and convenience store with accessory tractor
trailer fueling on the Property shall generally be
6/24/2026 Page 62 of 98
compatible with respect to the high-quality building
materials and architectural style shown on the
Conceptual Renderings (Exhibit B). (P)
13. Development Standards. Development of a gas
station and convenience store with accessory tractor
trailer fueling on the Property shall comply with the
Warehouse and Distribution (WD) District required
conditions and development standards set forth in the
County Code of Ordinances, Chapter 19.2 Zoning
Ordinance Modernization (ZOMod), except as outlined
in the “Adjustments to Ordinance Requirements”
proffered condition included below. (P)
14. Adjustments to Ordinance Requirements.
a. Building and Parking Setbacks/Required
Perimeter Landscaping – Arterial Road. A fifty foot
(50’) parking setback with perimeter landscaping B
shall be required along Ruffin Mill Road (Major
Arterial).
b. Building and Parking Setbacks/Required
Perimeter Landscaping – Collector/Local Road. A forty
foot (40’) parking setback with perimeter landscaping
B shall be required along Walthall Center Drive
(Collector/Local Road). (P)
15. Decorative Fencing. A three (3) rail wooden
fence, or comparable open rail fence of equal visual
quality as approved during plans review, shall be
provided along the Walthall Center Drive and Ruffin
Mill Road frontages of the Property, except at
approved vehicular access drives. The fence shall not
exceed four feet (4’) in height and the exact
location and design of the fence shall be subject to
review and approval by the Plans Review Manager at
the time of plans review. The Owner/Applicant, or
its successors or assigns, shall be responsible for
the maintenance and replacement of the fence in
perpetuity. (P)
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
D. 25SN1315 - Richardson Farm Animals - Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Richardson Farm
Animals is a request for conditional use to permit a
farm (keeping of farm animals) and amendment of
zoning district map in an Agricultural (A) District
on 1.72 acres known as 3909 Lakeview Road. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Residential Neighborhood 4 use (4.0
units per acre or less). Tax IDs 794-622-3686 and
4871.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board approved Case 25SN1315, subject to the
6/24/2026 Page 63 of 98
following conditions:
Conditions
1. Use. This conditional use approval shall be for
farm use, which shall be limited to the keeping of a
maximum of four (4) goats. (P)
2. Replacement of Goats; Other Permitted Animals.
The permitted number of goats in Condition 1 shall be
limited to the goats that resided on the Property as
of the date of approval and in conjunction with the
documentation required by Condition 8. Under no
circumstance shall any of the documented goats be
replaced with any other goats that are not documented
as required by Condition 8. Nothing contained herein
shall prohibit the keeping of common household pets
or chickens on the property as otherwise permitted
under applicable ordinances. (P)
3. Non-Transferable Ownership. This conditional
use approval shall be granted exclusively to Amber
Richardson and shall not be transferable nor run with
the land. (P)
4. Conceptual Plan. The proposed site layout,
depicting the location of a fenced area for the
keeping of goats, shall generally conform to the
layout as shown on Exhibit A. (P)
5. Commercial Activity. No commercial activity,
such as the breeding or sale of animals, shall be
permitted in conjunction with this use. (P)
6. Animal Waste. All areas associated with the
keeping of goats shall be cleaned and made free of
waste on a regular basis. Waste shall be disposed of
in an appropriate disposal contained that is
periodically removed from the site. In addition, the
property owner shall employ a means of eliminating
any odor problems and propagation of insects. (P)
7. Fencing. A fence with a minimum height of four
(4) feet shall be constructed to contain the goats
within the rear yard of the property in the general
location shown in Exhibit A. Such fence must be set
back at least ten (10) feet of the side property line
and fifteen (15) feet off the rear property line. No
animals shall be permitted to graze outside of the
fenced areas. The fence shall be installed within
ninety (90) days of zoning approval. (P)
8. Animal Documentation. The applicant shall
provide a history of the goats such as the age, sex,
color, and size, as well as a photo to the Planning
Department within thirty (30) days of zoning
approval. (P)
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
E. 26SN2022 - Southside Baptist Church Child Day Care -
Dale
6/24/2026 Page 64 of 98
In Dale Magisterial District, Southside Baptist
Church Child Day Care is a request for conditional
use to permit a child day care center and amendment
of zoning district map in a Semi-Urban Neighborhood
(SU) District on 6.84 acres known as 6000 Iron Bridge
Road. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for Residential Neighborhood 8 use (8.0
units per acre or less). Tax IDs 775-683-3761, 6259,
and 8748.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
Jerry Turner expressed concerns relative to the need
for a fenced play area.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Mr. Ingle, the
Board approved Case 26SN2022, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. Use. A child day care center, located within
existing church, shall be permitted on the Property.
(P)
2. Enrollment Limitation. The child day care center
use shall not exceed enrollment of fifty (50)
children on the premises at any given time. (P)
3. Outdoor Play Area & Equipment. Any outdoor play
area and equipment for the use shall initially be
located in the general area depicted on Exhibit A.
Should the outdoor play area and equipment be
expanded, the expansion and location shall be
evaluated through the plans review or building permit
process to ensure the new location provides adequate
spacing and screening (where necessary) from adjacent
properties. (P)
4. Hours of Operation. The use shall be permitted to
operate Monday through Friday between the hours of
6:30 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. (P)
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
F. 26SN2049 - Muthusubramanian Accessory Dwelling Unit -
Midlothian
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Muthusubramanian
Accessory Dwelling Unit is a request for conditional
use to permit an accessory dwelling unit (attached)
and amendment of zoning district map in a Suburban
Community (SC) District known as 12103 Wexwood Place.
The 0.79 acre property is developed with one (1)
single family dwelling and proposes one (1) accessory
6/24/2026 Page 65 of 98
dwelling unit (attached). The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Residential
Neighborhood 4 use (4.0 units per acre or less). Tax
ID 735-704-8231.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
Paige Muthusubramanian stated the request was for a
second stove in the basement. She asked the Board to
either reconsider the definition of an accessory
dwelling unit (ADU) or make the process more
streamlined so that more residents can take aging
family members into their home.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved Case 26SN2049, subject to the
following conditions:
Conditions
1. Occupancy. Occupancy of the accessory dwelling
shall be limited to the occupants of the principal
dwelling unit, individuals related to them by blood
marriage, adoption, or guardianship, foster children,
personal guests, or household employees. (P)
2. Deed Restriction. For the purpose of providing
record notice, prior to the issuance of a certificate
of occupancy for the accessory dwelling unit, a deed
restriction shall be recorded setting forth the
limitation in Condition 1. The deed book and page
number of this restriction and a copy of the
restriction as recorded shall be submitted to the
Planning Department. (P)
3. Accessory Dwelling Location, Size, and
Construction Limitations.
a. The accessory dwelling unit shall be
located on the Property within the existing single-
family dwelling and generally conform to the floor
plan depicted in Exhibit B.
b. The accessory dwelling unit shall not
exceed 800 square feet.
c. A manufactured home shall not be
permitted on the Property. (P)
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
G. 26SN2066 - Wood Agricultural Rezoning - Midlothian
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Wood Agricultural
Rezoning is a request to rezone from Employment
Center (EC) to Agricultural (A) and amendment of
zoning district map on 26.0 acres fronting
approximately 1,575 feet on the west side of
6/24/2026 Page 66 of 98
Otterdale Road, 5,900 feet north of Old Hundred Road,
known as 900 Otterdale Road. The Comprehensive Plan
suggests the property is appropriate for Office,
Light Production & Assembly use. Tax ID 718-703-8959.
Ms. Wilson introduced the case. She stated the
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
Discussion ensued between Dr. Miller and Principal
Planner Ryan Ramsey relative to buffers, data center
noise, and downzoning.
On motion of Dr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board approved Case 26SN2066, subject to the
following conditions:
Proffered Conditions
The applicant in this rezoning case, pursuant to
Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as
amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield
County (the “Zoning Ordinance”), for themselves and
their successors or assigns, proffer that the
property under consideration (the “Property”) submits
the following proffers if, and only if, the rezoning
request submitted herewith is granted with only those
conditions agreed to by the owners and applicant. In
the event this request is denied or approved with
conditions not agreed to by the owners and applicant,
the proffer shall immediately be null and void and of
no further force or effect.
1. Waterline Easement. Upon request of the County,
a twenty (20) foot public water line easement and a
ten (10) foot temporary construction easement for an
extension of the public water system shall be
provided to the County at no cost generally adjacent
to the right of way along Otterdale Road bordering
the subject property as shown on Utilities Exhibit A.
(U)
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
H. 25SN1153 - Marlbank Farms Residential Rezoning and
Adjustments - Matoaca
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Marlbank Farms
Residential Rezoning and Adjustments is a request to
rezone from Suburban Community (SC) to Semi-Urban
Neighborhood (SU) of 88.33 acres and Semi-Rural
Neighborhood (SR) of 124.66 acres with adjustments to
ordinance requirements for development standards on
the entire 212.99 acre property and amendment of
zoning district map on property fronting
approximately 2,800 feet along the north side of
Hickory Road, at the intersection of Halloway Avenue,
6/24/2026 Page 67 of 98
known as 5700 Hickory Road. The 212.99 acre property
is proposed for a maximum development of 302 dwelling
units. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property
is appropriate for Residential Neighborhood 4 use
(4.0 units per acre or less). Tax IDs 781-618-6468;
782-618-0852; 782-619-3017 and 7371; 783-619-1977;
783-620-6733; and 784-619-1209.
Case manager Harold Ellis introduced the case. He
stated the Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval, subject to the conditions in the staff
report.
Discussion ensued between Mr. Carroll and staff
relative to the sewer line easement and conservation
easement.
Jeffrey Geiger, representing the applicant, provided
additional details about the case.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
Linda Kidd-Fleshman spoke in opposition to the
density of the proposed subdivision and all the
problems it will bring — traffic, noise, trash,
overcrowded schools, overburdened first responders,
and destruction of both natural resources and
wildlife habitats.
Dennis Fleshman stated the proposed density is not
for that area, and he expressed concerns relative to
water runoff and traffic.
Steve Meadows expressed concerns relative to
conflicting densities and water.
Renae Eldred stated maybe this is a case where the
Board says no and takes its chances with the court.
She expressed concerns relative to the density.
Jerry Turner stated this is another case where the
Board needs to say no.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
Mr. Geiger provided a rebuttal to comments from
citizen speakers.
Discussion ensued between Board members, staff, and
the applicant relative to the 2006 case; BMPs; the
requirement to control water runoff in the current
case; possible loss of lots due to location of the
BMPs; dedication of right-of-way for a future sewer
line; location of BMPs; differentiation between BMPs
and amenities; square footage of the smaller homes;
and starting price.
Mr. Carroll provided additional details about the
case and discussed the conflict between his personal
feelings and his legal obligation.
In response to Mr. Carroll's question, Mr. Mincks
6/24/2026 Page 68 of 98
confirmed that an applicant could sue the Board if a
case were denied without legal justification.
Mr. Carroll then made a motion, seconded by Mr.
Ingle, for the Board to approve Case 25SN1153,
subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Additional discussion ensued relative to the case.
Mr. Carroll amended his motion to approve the case,
subject to the conditions in the staff report except
Condition 4.c., and Mr. Ingle seconded Mr. Carroll's
amended motion.
Additional discussion ensued relative to sewer lines
and future changes to the Comprehensive Plan.
Dr. Miller called for a vote on Mr. Carroll's motion,
seconded by Mr. Ingle, for the Board to approve Case
25SN1153, subject to the following conditions:
Proffered Condition
The property owners and applicant in this rezoning
case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of
Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance
of Chesterfield County (the “Zoning Ordinance”), for
themselves and their successors or assigns, proffer
that the property under consideration (the
“Property”) will be developed according to the
following proffers if, and only if, the rezoning
request submitted herewith is granted with only those
conditions agreed to by the owners and applicant. In
the event this request is denied or approved with
conditions not agreed to by the owners and applicant,
the proffers shall immediately be null and void and
of no further force or effect.
These Proffered Conditions include four (4) exhibits
attached hereto:
Exhibit A: “Marlbank Farms Conceptual Layout, Matoaca
District, Chesterfield County, Virginia” prepared by
Townes Site Engineering, dated April 16, 2026
(“Conceptual Plan”).
Exhibit B: Single Family Detached Elevations dated
April 16, 2025.
Exhibit C: Marlbank Farms Hickory Road Buffer Section
prepared by Townes Site Engineering, dated December
5, 2025
Exhibit D: Utility Exhibit dated March 26, 2026.
APPLICABLE TO BOTH ZONING DISTRICTS
1. Conceptual Plan. The Property shall be
developed in general conformance with the Conceptual
Plan. The Conceptual Plan is conceptual in nature and
may vary based on the final approved subdivision
plans or site plan, as applicable, depending on the
final soil studies, RPA lines, road design, lot
6/24/2026 Page 69 of 98
locations, lot line locations, amenity locations and
types, Virginia Department of Transportation (“VDOT”)
and County Transportation Department (“CDOT”)
requirements, BMP design and location, pedestrian way
design and location, and other design or engineering
reasons. The use of traffic calming as noted on the
Conceptual Plan is subject to VDOT approval, and
shall not be required if not approved by VDOT. Any
substantive changes that do not relate to the prior
sentences may be submitted to the Planning Director
for approval at the time of plans review. The
Director shall evaluate the change(s) to determine
that change(s) are consistent with the spirit and
intent of the community designs shown on the
Conceptual Plan. In the event of any conflict between
information shown on the Conceptual Plan and these
Proffered Conditions, these Proffered Conditions
shall control. (P)
2. Residential Density. The total number of
residential dwelling units on the Property shall not
exceed 302 units. (P)
3. Age-Targeted Dwelling Units. A minimum of
twenty-five (25) percent of the dwelling units
constructed on the Property shall be constructed with
a primary bedroom with en-suite on the first floor.
(P)
4. Utilities.
a. Public water and wastewater shall be
used, except that the estate lots (minimum of 40,000
s.f. in area) need not connect to public sewer.
b. A 16” public waterline shall be
constructed along Hickory Road, extending from the
eastern entrance and stubbed to the eastern boundary
line of the project, unless the Director of Public
Utilities approves a different location at plans
review or determines this improvement is not needed.
Connection fee credits shall be provided for the
costs of oversizing this water line extension to
serve other properties.
c. Removed
d. In conjunction with final subdivision
plat review and approval, the owner of the Property
shall dedicate to Chesterfield County, subject to
existing easements, a permanent public “boxout” water
easement for future installation of a pressure
reducing valve (“PRV”). The easement area shall not
exceed 1500 s.f. and shall be located as generally
shown on the Utilities Exhibit, unless a different
location is agreed to by the Utilities Department and
the developer/owner of the Property and the at the
time of plans review and approval. (U)
5. Environmental Engineering. The maximum post-
development discharge rate for the 100-year storm
shall be based on the maximum capacity of the
existing facilities downstream and shall not increase
6/24/2026 Page 70 of 98
the recorded and /or established 100-year backwater
and /or floodplain. On-Site detention of the post-
development 100-year discharge rate to below the pre-
development 100-year discharge rate may be provided
to satisfy this requirement. (EE)
6. Chesterfield Department of Transportation.
a. Access. Direct vehicular access from the
Property to Hickory Road shall be limited to two (2)
entrances/exits. The exact location of each access
shall be approved by CDOT based on VDOT requirements.
b. Dedication. In conjunction with the
recordation of the initial subdivision plat, or
within sixty (60) days of a written request by the
Transportation Department, whichever occurs first,
the following shall be dedicated, free and
unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield
County:
i. Forty-five (45) feet of right of
way along the north side of Hickory Road for the
entire Property frontage, based on a revised
centerline based on VDOT Urban Minor Arterial (45
mph) with modifications approved by CDOT.
c. Road Improvements. The following road
improvements shall be completed by the owner of the
Property. Any modification to the alignment, design
and length shall be approved by CDOT in accordance
with VDOT requirements. If any of the road
improvements identified below are provided by others,
as determined by CDOT, then the specific road
improvement shall no longer be required. If requested
by the Owner/Developer and approved by CDOT, the
timing for completion of road improvement(s) may be
adjusted by a phasing plan.
i. Reconstruction of the Hickory
Road curve towards the eastern part of the Property
based on VDOT Urban Minor Arterial standards (45
mph), with any modifications approved by CDOT.
Improvement shall be completed with initial
development of the Property.
ii. Widen/improve the north side of
Hickory Road for the entire Property frontage, to
provide an eleven (11) foot wide travel lane, as
measured from the centerline of the road, with an
additional five (5) foot wide paved shoulder and
overlay the full width of the road, with any
modifications approved by CDOT in accordance with
VDOT requirements, waivers or approvals. Improvement
shall be completed with initial development of the
Property.
iii. Construction of left and right
turn lanes along Hickory Road at each approved
access. Improvement shall be completed in conjunction
with each vehicular access.
iv. If approved by VDOT,
construction of a VDOT standard crosswalk across
Hickory Road at one of the approved Hickory Road
access locations to include all associated
6/24/2026 Page 71 of 98
improvements (markings, signage, ramps, and
lighting), as determined by CDOT; provided, however,
that the owner/developer shall not be responsible for
installation of a pedestrian hybrid beacon/”HAWK”
signal or similar structure as determined by CDOT.
Improvement shall be completed in conjunction with
the Hickory Road vehicular access where the crosswalk
will be provided.
v. Dedication to the County or VDOT,
as applicable, free and unrestricted, of any
additional right-of-way or easements required for the
improvements identified above. In the event the
developer is unable to acquire any “off-site” right-
of-way that is necessary for the road improvements
described in subparagraph (i) of this proffered
condition, the developer may request, in writing,
that the County acquire such right-of-way as a public
road improvement. All costs associated with the
acquisition of the right-of-way shall be approved and
borne by the developer. In the event the County
chooses not to assist the developer in acquisition of
the “off-site” right-of-way, the developer shall be
relieved of the obligation to acquire the “off-site”
right-of-way and shall provide the road improvements
within available right-of-way as determined by CDOT
and the road improvements provided within available
right of way shall be deemed to satisfy the
applicable requirement in this proffered condition.
(T)
7. Adjustments.
a. Bikeway. No bikeway shall be required
along Hickory Road and within the Property because
there are no plans for bikeways in this area of the
County which would connect to bikeways associated
with this project.
b. Sidewalk. No sidewalks shall be required
along Hickory Road. A sidewalk will be provided on
one side of the roads within the SR zoned portion of
the Property. The applicant is also providing a
standard crosswalk across Hickory Road, to provide
pedestrian connectivity to the school. The required
sidewalks in the SU zoned portion of the Property
will provide internal pedestrian ways to this
crosswalk.
c. Public Utility Easements in Buffers.
Public utility easements granted to Chesterfield
County may be located in any manner, including,
without limitation, a parallel manner, within the
portion of the required buffer along Hickory Road
generally east of lot 1, as such lot is illustrated
on Exhibit D. The length of such portion of the
required buffer is generally illustrated on Exhibit D
by the blue line within the required buffer along
Hickory Road. (P)
8. Foundation Masonry. There shall be a minimum
vertical height of eighteen (18) inches of brick,
brick veneer, stone, stone veneer, or other masonry
material approved by the Planning Director installed
6/24/2026 Page 72 of 98
above grade for units with slab-on-grade foundations
on all front elevations. There shall be a minimum
vertical height of twelve (12) inches of brick, brick
veneer, stone, stone veneer, or other masonry
material approved by the Planning Director installed
above grade for units with slab-on-grade foundations
on all side and rear elevations. All foundations
shall be faced entirely of brick, brick veneer,
stone, stone veneer, cultured stone, and/or other
masonry materials except for units where the grade
drops along the façade foundation this required
masonry may step down at twelve inch (12”) intervals.
Synthetic or natural stucco foundations may be
permitted for facades constructed entirely of stucco.
An alternative foundation masonry requirement may be
approved by the Planning Director at the time of
plans review. (P)
9. Foundation Plantings. Foundation planting beds
shall be required along the entire front façade of
buildings excluding garages, stairs and walkways
accessing porches and patios. Foundation planting
beds shall be a minimum of four feet (4’) wide
measured from the dwelling unit foundation, unless a
narrower width is approved to accommodate
construction needs. Foundation planting beds that
extend a minimum of one third (1/3) of the length of
the side elevation (as measured from the front corner
of the unit) are also required on building side
elevations that are adjacent to public streets.
Foundation planting beds shall contain a minimum of
fifty (50) percent evergreen material with one (1)
shrub per three (3) linear feet wide as measured from
the unit foundation. Unit corners shall be visually
softened with vertical accent shrubs (4’-5’ at the
time of planting) or small evergreen trees (6’-8’ at
the time of planting). An alternative foundation
planting standard may be approved by the Planning
Director at the time of plans review for some or all
of the buildings in the project. (P)
10. Driveways/Front Walks. All private driveways
shall be hardscaped (concrete, pavers or other
material approved by the Planning Director at the
time of plans review). Front walks shall be provided
from the driveway or sidewalk to the front entrance
of a dwelling. All front walks shall be a minimum of
three (3) feet in width and hardscaped (concrete,
asphalt, pavers or other material approved by the
Planning Director at the time of plans review). (P)
11. Porches and Stoops. Front stoops and porches
shall be constructed with continuous foundation
walls, or with masonry piers to match the foundation
of the home. Extended front porches shall be a
minimum of five (5) feet deep. Handrails and
railings, when required by the building code, shall
be finished painted wood, vinyl rails or metal rail
systems with vertical pickets, sawn balusters, or
other products of equal quality. Pickets shall be
supported on top and bottom rails that span between
columns. (P)
6/24/2026 Page 73 of 98
12. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning
(HVAC) Units and Generators. HVAC units and
generators installed as fixtures shall be screened
initially from view of roads by landscaping or low
maintenance material, as approved by the Planning
Department. (P)
13. Architecture. Development of single family
detached dwellings shall be in general conformance
with the illustrative elevations in Exhibit B or
another architectural appearance approved by the
Planning Director at the time of plans review.
Subsequent to plans approval, the owner may also
request approval of another architectural appearance
by the Planning Director. The illustrative elevations
are conceptual in nature and may vary at the time of
plans review. For example, the location of materials,
types of material, use of stoops, use of covered
porches, and other architectural detailing may change
and may vary from home to home. (P)
14. Variation in Front Elevations. Buildings with
the same front elevation may not be located next to
each other or across a street from each other.
Variation in the front elevation may not be achieved
by simply mirroring the façade, but may be
accomplished by providing at least three (3) of the
following architectural changes:
a. Adding masonry elements above the
masonry required for the foundation.
b. Changing the location of roof type,
roof line, front facing gable(s) and/or dormers.
c. Changing the style of roof type, roof
line, front facing gable(s) and/or dormers.
d. Providing varied siding application
using horizontal siding, shake siding or board and
batten siding.
e. Providing varied color application.
f. Adding or removing a porch.
g. Adding or removing a covered stoop.
h. Adding projections such as bay/box
windows, second floor balconies, or accent roofs.
i. Changing the home width.
j. Changing the home height.
k. Adding shutters.
l. Adding trimmed windows.
m. Any other element of architectural
variation as approved by the Director of Planning.
(P)
15. Exterior Materials.
a. Acceptable siding materials include
brick, stone, masonry, fiber cement siding,
engineered wood siding or high-grade vinyl (a minimum
of .044” nominal thickness as evidenced by
manufacturer’s printed literature). Dutch lap,
plywood, and metal siding are not permitted. Other
materials may be used for parapets, cornices,
surrounds, soffits, trim, architectural decorations,
and design elements.
6/24/2026 Page 74 of 98
b. Slanted roofing material shall be
dimensional architectural shingles with a minimum
thirty (30) year warranty or standing seam metal.
Materials used on flat roofs shall have a minimum
thirty (30) year warranty or equivalent as approved
by the Planning Director. (P)
16. Buffer Grading. Land Disturbance shall be
permitted for grading, tie-ins, and other engineering
reasons as long as the entire depth of the buffer is
not disturbed. (P)
17. Hickory Road Berm. The portion of the fifty-
foot (50’) wide buffer along Hickory Road located
between lots and Hickory Road shall be improved with
a berm in general conformance with the berm design
illustrated on Exhibit C. This berm shall be a
minimum 6.5’ high, as illustrated on Exhibit C,
unless otherwise approved at the time of plans review
by the Planning Director. For clarity, where the
buffer does not adjoin a lot, then no berm is
required. (P)
18. Lighting. Lighting requirements for sidewalks
and driveways shall be met with a post light placed
in the front yard with an additional carriage light
near the garage door. (P)
19. Garage Depth. If the garage projects more than
five (5) feet from the main dwelling line of the
home, then a window shall be included in the garage
sidewall adjacent to the lead walk or the front door.
(P)
20. Garage Doors. Any front-loaded garage door
shall use an upgraded garage door. An upgraded garage
door is any door that meets one of the following two
(2) requirements:
a. A minimum of three (3) enhanced
features are provided on the garage door. Enhanced
features shall include windows, raised panels,
decorative panels, arches, ornamental hardware or
other architectural features on the exterior that
enhance the entry (i.e. decorative lintels, shed roof
overhangs arches, columns, keystones, eyebrows,
etc.). Flat panel garage doors shall be prohibited.
b. The garage door provides an enhanced
architectural style that relates to the architecture
of the dwelling the garage serves. Enhanced
architectural style shall mean the use of color,
panels and/or windows to reflect an architectural
style such as contemporary, modern, modern farmhouse,
mediterranean, colonial, and tudor. The architectural
style may be evidenced by manufacturer printed
material. (P)
APPLICABLE TO THE SR ZONING DISTRICT
21. Estate Lots; Conservation Area.
a. Estate Lots. The minimum number of
6/24/2026 Page 75 of 98
estate lots (minimum of 40,000 s.f. in area) shall be
thirty (30), unless a septic site cannot be permitted
within one or more of the estate lots shown on the
Conceptual Plan (each an “Un-permittable Lot”) and,
in which event, the minimum number of estate lots
shall be reduced by the number of Un-permittable
Lots. A soil study approved by the Department of
Health (or other appropriate governmental agency)
shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior to
preliminary plan approval to demonstrate the number
of Un-permittable Lots.
b. Street Trees. One tree shall be
planted in the front yard of each lot.
c. Sidewalk. A sidewalk shall be provided
on one side of each road.
d. Conservation Area. Any portion of the
Property zoned SR that is located outside the
property lines for the lots within the portion of the
Property zoned SR shall be placed into a conservation
area to be owned by the homeowners association. The
conservation area shall remain in its natural state
and used only for the purposes listed below. An
instrument shall be recorded against the conservation
area restricting the use of the conservation area in
accordance with this proffered condition.
i. Storm water management and/or
retention areas;
ii. Ponds, lakes, and similar
areas intended as aesthetic and/or recreational
amenities and/or wildlife habitats;
iii. Utility easements, signage,
walkways and recreational facilities installed in a
manner to minimize their impacts;
iv. Removal of dead, diseased or
dying vegetation; and
v. Such additional uses to the
uses identified in (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) above
as may be deemed compatible and of the same general
character by the Planning Director. (P)
APPLICABLE TO THE SU ZONING DISTRICT
22. Strategic Amenity Space.
a. A plaza or active recreation will be
located in the area noted as “strategic amenity
space.”
b. An active recreation area in the
location noted on the Conceptual Plan. (P)
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
19. Public Hearings
A. To Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domain for the
Center Pointe Parkway Extension Project
6/24/2026 Page 76 of 98
Director of Transportation Chessa Walker introduced
the public hearing. She stated that the county has
settled with all but one of the property owners. She
further stated the county has a verbal agreement with
the property owner, an apartment complex, which has
chosen to run the agreement by its lienholder.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
Jerry Turner expressed opposition to the Board's
taking of people's property.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
Discussion ensued between Board members and Ms.
Walker relative to the size of the property needed;
having a willing seller at a willing price; and
issues working with homeowners associations (HOAs) to
get a quorum.
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Mr. Carroll, the
Board authorized the exercise of eminent domain,
including the filing of certificates of take, for the
acquisition of right-of-way and easements for the
Center Pointe Parkway Extension Project, so that
construction can proceed on schedule, for the
following property owner: PC VA Creekpointe LLC,
Parcel ID 722-694-6658, 14600 Creekpointe Circle.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
B. To Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domain for the
Western Area Infrastructure Improvements Project
Ms. Walker introduced the public hearing. She stated
the county has reached agreement with all but two
property owners, Main Street Homes and Mr. Gill, each
of whom owns two parcels.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
Jerry Turner expressed opposition to the Board's
taking of people's property.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
Discussion ensued between Board members and Ms.
Walker about whether the county required dedication
of the right of way from Main Street Homes at the
time of the zoning case and paying for the design and
extension of the waterline to John Thomas Way.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Dr. Miller, the
Board authorized the exercise of eminent domain,
including the filing of certificates of take, for the
acquisition of right-of-way and easements for the
Western Area Infrastructure Improvements Project, so
that construction can proceed on schedule, for the
following property owners: 17401 Duval Rd LLC, Parcel
ID 705-676-6205, 17401 Duval Road; 17601 Duval Rd
6/24/2026 Page 77 of 98
LLC, Parcel ID 704-675-8191, 17601 Duval Road; MS SB
Duval East JV LLC, Parcel ID 703-675-1477, 18001
Duval Road; and MS SB Duval East JV LLC, 702-675-
0476, 18101 Duval Road.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
C. To Consider Ordinance Amendments Relating to Chapter
8 Stormwater Management and Water Quality
Deputy County Administrator Jesse Smith introduced
the public hearing.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
Renae Eldred expressed concerns relative to the
state-mandated fee increases, which get passed along
to homebuyers and negatively impact affordable
housing.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Ingle, seconded by Dr. Hylton, the
Board adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND
REENACTING SECTION 8-64 RELATIVE TO FEES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section 8-64 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-
enacted, to read as follows:
Chapter 8
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND WATER QUALITY
OOO
Sec. 8-64. Fees.
(a) The applicant shall pay a program administration
fee to cover the cost of erosion sediment control
plan review at the time the applicant submits to
the environmental engineer an erosion sediment
control plan. The amount of the fee shall be:
(i) For an erosion and sediment control plan for
land disturbance which is 10,000 square feet or
larger and not located in a proposed
subdivision: $1,360.00, plus $60.00 for each
acre of land to be disturbed.
(ii) For an erosion and sediment control plan for
land disturbance which is 10,000 square feet or
larger and located in a proposed subdivision:
$1,360.00, plus $60.00 for each lot.
(iii) For an erosion and sediment control plan for
land disturbance which is less than 10,000
square feet and is not to be used for a single-
family residence: $100.00.
6/24/2026 Page 78 of 98
(iv) For any building permit application or
erosion and sediment control plan that is to be
used for a single-family residence, separately
built or any amendment thereto that changes the
proposed building footprint from that of the
initial submission: $50.00.
(v) For resubmission of all or part of an erosion
and sediment control plan for a subdivision or
a residential development for which plan
approval has previously been granted, there
shall be a fee of $1,000.00 unless the
resubmittal was requested by or on behalf of
the county.
(vi) For a non-exempt timber management plan:
$100.00.
(b) No program administration fee shall be required
for an erosion and sediment control plan for land-
disturbing activity that takes place in
conjunction with a land use for which a minor site
plan has been approved in accordance with the
zoning ordinance.
(c) If a land-disturbance permit is revoked, the
applicant shall pay an administrative fee in an
amount equal to one-half of the original program
administration fee when the applicant applies to
have the land-disturbance permit reissued.
(d) No business located within an enterprise zone or
subzone designated by the commonwealth or
technology zone designated by the county shall be
required to pay any of the fees described in this
section.
(e) Fees to cover costs associated with
implementation of state permits related to land
disturbing activities shall be imposed in
accordance with Table 1. These fees listed below,
shall be paid prior to the issuance of a land
disturbance permit. When a site or sites has been
purchased for development within a previously
permitted common plan of development or sale, the
applicant shall be subject to fees in accordance
with the disturbed acreage of their site or sites
according to Table 1.
Table 1: Fees for permit issuance
Fee type Fee to be
paid by
Applicant
to County
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act Land-
Disturbing Activity (not subject to
General Permit coverage; sites within
designated areas of Chesapeake Bay Act
localities with land-disturbance
acreage equal to or greater than 2,500
square feet and less than 1 acre)
$290.00
General/Stormwater Management — Small
Construction Activity/Land Clearing
(Areas within common plans of
development or sale with land
$450.001
6/24/2026 Page 79 of 98
disturbance acreage less than 1
acre.)
General/Stormwater Management — All
single family detached residential
structures within or outside a common
plan of development
$209.00
General/Stormwater Management — Small
Construction Activity/Land Clearing
(Sites or areas within common plans of
development or sale with land
disturbance acreage equal to or
greater than 1 acre and less than 5
Acres)
$4,100.001
General/Stormwater Management — Large
Construction Activity/Land Clearing
(Sites or areas within common plans of
development or sale with land
disturbance acreage equal to or
greater than 5 acres and less than 10
acres)
$5,100.001
General/Stormwater Management — Large
Construction Activity/Land Clearing
[Sites or areas within common plans of
development or sale with land
disturbance acreage equal to or
greater than 10 acres and less than 50
acres]
$6,800.001
General/Stormwater Management — Large
Construction Activity/Land Clearing
(Sites or areas within common plans of
development or sale with land
disturbance acreage equal to or
greater than 50 acres and less than
100 acres)
$9,100.001
General/Stormwater Management — Large
Construction Activity/Land Clearing
(Sites or areas within common plans of
development or sale with land
disturbance acreage equal to or
greater than 100 acres)
$14,300.001
1. A portion of the fee, 30%, is transferred to
DEQ.
* If the project is completely administered by DEQ
such as may be the case for a state or federal
project or projects covered by individual permits,
the entire applicant fee shall be paid to DEQ.
(f) Fees for the modification or transfer of
registration statements from the general permit
issued by the state board shall be imposed in
accordance with Table 2. If the general permit
modifications result in changes to stormwater
management plans that require additional review by
the county, such reviews shall be subject to the
fees set out in Table 2. The fee assessed shall be
based on the total disturbed acreage of the site.
In addition to the general permit modification
fee, modifications resulting in an increase in
total disturbed acreage shall pay the difference
in the initial permit fee paid and the permit fee
that would have applied for the total disturbed
acreage in Table 1.
6/24/2026 Page 80 of 98
Table 2: Fees Paid to the County for the Modification
or Transfer of Registration Statements for the
General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from
Construction Activities
Type of Permit Fee Amount
General/Stormwater Management — Small
Construction Activity/Land Clearing
(Areas within common plans of
development or sale with land
disturbance acreage less than 1 acre)
$30.00
General/Stormwater Management — Small
Construction Activity/Land Clearing
(Sites or areas within common plans of
development or sale with land
disturbance acreage equal to or
greater than 1 and less than 5 acres)
$320.00
General/Stormwater Management — Large
Construction Activity/Land Clearing
(Sites or areas within common plans of
development or sale with land
disturbance acreage equal to or
greater than 5 acres and less than 10
acres)
$400.00
General/Stormwater Management — Large
Construction Activity/Land Clearing
(Sites or areas within common plans of
development or sale with land
disturbance acreage equal to or
greater than 10 acres and less than 50
acres)
$480.00
General/Stormwater Management — Large
Construction Activity/Land Clearing
(Sites or areas within common plans of
development or sale with land
disturbance acreage equal to or
greater than 50 acres and less than
100 acres)
$720.00
General/Stormwater Management — Large
Construction Activity/Land Clearing
(Sites or areas within common plans of
development or sale with land
disturbance acreage equal to or
greater than 100 acres)
$1,120.00
* The fee for re-issuance of a revoked permit is one-
half of the original issuance fee.
(g) The following annual permit maintenance fees
shall be imposed in accordance with Table 3,
including fees imposed on expired permits that
have been administratively continued. With respect
to the general permit, these fees shall apply
until the permit coverage is terminated.
Table 3: Permit Maintenance Fees
Type of Permit Fee Amount
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act Land-
Disturbing Activity (not subject to
$80.00
6/24/2026 Page 81 of 98
General Permit coverage; sites within
designated areas of Chesapeake Bay Act
localities with land-disturbance
acreage equal to or greater than 2,500
square feet and less than 1 acre)
General/Stormwater Management — Small
Construction Activity/Land Clearing
(Areas within common plans of
development or sale with land
disturbance acreage less than 1 acre)
$80.00
General/Stormwater Management — Small
Construction Activity/Land Clearing
(Sites or areas within common plans of
development or sale with land
disturbance equal to or greater than 1
acre and less than 5 acres)
$650.00
General/Stormwater Management — Large
Construction Activity/Land Clearing
(Sites or areas within common plans of
development or sale with land
disturbance acreage equal to or
greater than 5 acres and less than 10
acres)
$800.00
General/Stormwater Management — Large
Construction Activity/Land Clearing
(Sites or areas within common plans of
development or sale with land
disturbance acreage equal to or
greater than 10 acres and less than 50
acres)
$1,050.00
General/Stormwater Management — Large
Construction Activity/Land Clearing
(Sites or areas within common plans of
development or sale with land
disturbance acreage equal to or
greater than 50 acres and less than
100 acres)
$1,450.00
General/Stormwater Management — Large
Construction Activity/Land Clearing
(Sites or areas within common plans of
development or sale with land
disturbance acreage equal to or
greater 100 acres)
$2,250.00
Permit coverage maintenance fees shall be paid
annually to the county, by the anniversary date of
the issuance of the land disturbance permit. No
permit will be reissued or automatically continued
without payment of the required fee. Permit coverage
maintenance fees shall be applied until a notice of
termination is effective.
(h) The fees set forth in subsections (e) through
(g), shall apply to:
(1) All persons seeking coverage under the general
permit.
6/24/2026 Page 82 of 98
(2) All permittees who request modifications to or
transfers of their existing registration
statement for coverage under a general permit.
(3) Permit and permit coverage maintenance fees
outlined under section 8-64(g) may apply to
each general permit holder.
(i) No general permit application fees will be
assessed to:
(1) Permittees who request minor modifications to
general permits as defined in section 8-46.
Permit modifications at the request of the
permittee resulting in changes to stormwater
management plans that require additional review
by the environmental engineer shall not be
exempt pursuant to this section.
(2) Permittees whose general permits are modified
or amended at the initiative of DEQ, excluding
errors in the registration statement identified
by the environmental engineer or errors related
to the acreage of the site.
(j) All incomplete payments will be deemed as
nonpayments, and the applicant shall be notified
of any incomplete payments. Interest may be
charged for late payments at the underpayment rate
set forth in Code of Virginia, § 58.1-15 and is
calculated on a monthly basis at the applicable
periodic rate. A ten percent late payment fee
shall be charged to any delinquent (over 90 days
past due) account. The county shall be entitled to
all remedies available under the Code of Virginia
in collecting any past due amount.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately after adoption.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
D. To Consider the Creation of the Sawmill Station
Community Development Authority
Deputy County Administrator Matt Harris introduced
the public hearing. He stated this would be a two-
part exercise, the first part being this public
hearing to receive comments on the petition from the
landowner. He further stated the Board would not take
a vote after closing the public hearing. He stated
the Board will hold a public hearing on July 22,
2026, to consider adoption of the ordinance creating
the community development authority (CDA).
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
E. To Consider an Ordinance to Amend County Code Section
19.2 (Zoning Ordinance) Relative to Setbacks from
Electric Transmission Lines
Zoning Administrator Thomas Jenkins introduced the
public hearing.
6/24/2026 Page 83 of 98
Discussion ensued relative to placement of utilities
and timbering.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND
REENACTING SECTION 19.2-37 RELATIVE TO
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section 19.2-37 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-
enacted, to read as follows:
Chapter 19.2
OOO
19.2-37 Dimensional Standards D. Setbacks. 2. Special Setbacks. (See Sec. 19.2-45
Streets, Transportation, and Connectivity)
j. Residential Subdivision Projects -
Aboveground electric transmission line
setbacks. For lot subdivisions recorded after
June 24, 2026, a 100-foot setback shall be
maintained between lot boundaries and any
easement for aboveground high-voltage electric
transmission lines recorded after June 24,
2026. Natural vegetation within the setback
area shall be retained, except that vegetation
removal is permissible as required to prevent
interference with the electric transmission
lines and for installation and maintenance of
pathways and trails. Lot subdivisions that are
conforming to this requirement at the time of
recordation shall not be considered
nonconforming in the event such an easement is
recorded within 100 feet of the lots at a
subsequent date.
OOO
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately after adoption.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
F. To Consider an Amendment to County Code Sections 9-29
Through 9-32 Relative to the Rehabilitation Ordinance
6/24/2026 Page 84 of 98
Mr. Harris introduced the public hearing.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
Renae Eldred stated the Board needs to scrap the
program because it has been around for decades and
nobody uses it.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
In response to Ms. Schneider's question, Mr. Harris
agreed the changes were being made to encourage more
people to use the program.
On motion of Ms. Schneider, seconded by Dr. Hylton,
the Board adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND
REENACTING
SECTIONS 9-29 THROUGH 9-32 RELATIVE TO PROVIDING A
PARTIAL
EXEMPTION FROM REAL PROPERTY TAXATION FOR CERTAIN
REHABILITATED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County:
(1) That Sections 9-29 through 9-32 of the Code of the
County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended
and re-enacted, to read as follows:
CHAPTER 9
OOO
ARTICLE II. - REAL ESTATE TAX Division 3. Exemptions
OOO SEC. 9-29 Partial Exemption for rehabilitated single-family residential real estate
Substantial rehabilitation of older single-family
residences promotes the health, safety, and welfare of
its citizens; stabilizes and improves residential
neighborhoods; encourages private investment in the
existing housing stock; and expands the availability
of quality owner-occupied housing. This ordinance is
enacted pursuant to the authority granted by Virginia
Code § 58.1-3220 and Article X, § 6(b) of the
Constitution of Virginia.
(a) As used in this ordinance:
Base assessed value means the assessed value of the
structure as determined by the county assessor upon
receipt of a timely application and prior to
commencement of any qualifying rehabilitation work.
Increase in assessed value means the difference between
the base assessed value and the assessed value of the
structure as determined by the county assessor upon
completion of the qualifying rehabilitation.
6/24/2026 Page 85 of 98
Qualifying rehabilitation means substantial
rehabilitation, renovation, or replacement of a
structure that satisfies all eligibility criteria set
forth in Section 9-29(b) of this ordinance and for
which all required building permits have been obtained.
Single-family residential structure means a structure
designed and used exclusively as a dwelling unit for
one family, including attached and detached single-
family homes, duplexes, triplexes, townhouse units, and
any structure containing five or less dwelling units.
(b) Eligibility Criteria.
To qualify for the partial exemption provided by this
ordinance, a property must satisfy all of the following
requirements:
(1) Ownership and occupancy. The property must be
owned by a natural person or persons and must be
lawfully used and occupied by the owner as his or her
primary place of residence or rented to a third party
as a single family as a primary place of residence.
Properties owned by corporations, limited liability
companies, partnerships, trusts, or other legal
entities are not eligible, except that a revocable
living trust where the grantor occupies the property
as a primary residence shall be deemed to satisfy this
requirement. The owner-occupancy requirement must be
satisfied as of January 1 of each year during the
exemption period; failure to maintain owner-occupancy
in any year shall terminate the exemption as of January
1 of that year.
(2) Structure type. The structure must be a
single-family residential structure as defined herein.
(3) Age of structure. The structure must be no
less than 25 years of age at the time of application.
(4) Maximum pre-rehabilitation assessment. The
property must have an assessed value prior to the
proposed rehabilitative work of no more than $500,000
as determined by the county assessor.
(5) Minimum increase in assessed value. The
qualifying rehabilitation must result in an increase
in the assessed value of the structure of not less than
fifteen percent (15%) above the base assessed value as
determined by the county assessor upon completion of
the work. Increases attributable solely to rising
market conditions, and not to physical improvements,
do not satisfy this requirement.
(6) Square footage limitation. The total above-
grade living area of the structure following
rehabilitation shall not exceed one hundred thirty
percent (130%) of the above-grade living area of the
structure prior to rehabilitation. Additions in excess
of this limit are ineligible for exemption.
(7) Ineligible improvements. Landscaping,
driveways, fencing, detached outbuildings, swimming
pools, and other site improvements that are not part
of the principal structure do not qualify.
6/24/2026 Page 86 of 98
(8) Permits and inspections. All required building
permits and a base value inspection by the county
assessor must have been obtained prior to commencement
of work. No exemption shall be granted unless the
county assessor has conducted a base value inspection
before the work commences and verified that the
rehabilitation work described in the application has
been completed and a final inspection or certificate
of occupancy has been issued.
(9) No delinquent taxes. No delinquent real
property taxes may be owed on the property at the time
of application or at any time during the exemption
period. Delinquency shall terminate the exemption as
of January 1 of the year in which taxes become
delinquent.
(10) Historic resources restriction. Where
rehabilitation is achieved through demolition and
replacement of an existing structure, this exemption
shall not apply when the demolished structure is a
registered Virginia landmark or is determined by the
Department of Historic Resources to contribute to the
significance of a registered historic district. See Va.
Code § 58.1-3220(F). All rehabilitation to residential
properties designated as historic shall be approved by
the county preservation committee.
SEC. 9-30. Exemption amount and tiered abatement schedule.
(a) Basis of exemption. The partial exemption shall be
applied to the increase in assessed value of the
structure resulting from the qualifying
rehabilitation, as determined by the county assessor.
The exemption is applied to assessed value before taxes
are calculated; it does not freeze the assessed value
of the property.
(b) Tiered schedule. The exemption shall run with the
real estate for a period of ten (10) years from the
commencement date established under Section 9-30(e),
and shall be applied to the increase in assessed value
according to the following schedule:
Year of Exemption
Percentage of Increase in Assessed Value Exempt
Year 1 100%
Year 2 100%
Year 3 100%
Year 4 100%
Year 5 100%
Year 6 100%
Year 7 100%
6/24/2026 Page 87 of 98
(c) Fixed exemption amount. The dollar amount of the
increase in assessed value upon which the percentage
in subsection (b) is applied shall be fixed at the
amount determined by the county assessor at the time
of completion of the rehabilitation and shall not be
adjusted for subsequent reassessments during the
exemption period. The applicable percentage shall
decline according to the schedule above regardless of
changes in the tax rate.
(d) No reduction below zero. In no event shall the
exemption produce a tax liability of less than zero.
(e) Commencement and term. The exemption shall commence
on January 1 of the tax year immediately following the
calendar year in which the qualifying rehabilitation
is completed and verified by the county assessor. Only
qualifying work completed within the 24 months
following application approval shall be eligible. The
exemption runs with the real estate for ten (10)
consecutive years from the commencement date and is not
affected by a change in ownership, except that the
owner-occupancy requirement must be satisfied in each
year as provided therein.
SEC. 9-31. Application procedure.
(a) Filing deadline. An application for the exemption
must be filed with the county assessor within twelve
(12) months prior to commencement of the qualifying
rehabilitation work.
(b) Application contents. The application shall be on
a form prescribed by the county assessor and shall
include: (i) the address and parcel identification
number of the property; (ii) documentation confirming
owner-occupancy; (iii) a description of all
rehabilitation work performed; (iv) copies of all
building permits and the final inspection report or
certificate of occupancy; (v) itemized paid receipts
for all rehabilitation expenditures; and (vi) such
other information as the county assessor may require.
(c) Application fee. A fee of $100 shall be assessed
for processing each application.
(d) Inspection. The county assessor shall inspect the
property prior to and following completion of the
rehabilitation to establish the base assessed value and
to verify completion of the work described in the
application.
(e) Written notification. Upon approval, the county
assessor shall provide the owner with written
notification of the exempt amount and the commencement
and expiration dates of the exemption period.
SEC. 9-32. Termination.
Year 8 75%
Year 9 50%
Year 10 25%
6/24/2026 Page 88 of 98
The exemption shall terminate prior to the expiration
of the ten-year period upon the occurrence of any of
the following:
(a) The property ceases to meet the owner-occupied
requirement of Section 9-29(b)(1) as of January 1 of
any year during the exemption period;
(b) The property taxes on the subject real estate
become delinquent;
(c) The property is converted to a use other than
single-family residential;
(d) A material misrepresentation is found in the
application, in which case the exemption shall be
deemed void ab initio and all previously exempted
taxes shall be subject to recovery with interest and
penalties as provided by law.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately after adoption.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
G. To Consider Dissolution of the Centerpointe-Charter
Colony Service District
Mr. Harris introduced the public hearing.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO REPEAL THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, SECTIONS 9-40
THROUGH 9-50
RELATIVE TO POWHITE PARKWAY-CHARTER COLONY
PARKWAY
INTERCHANGE SERVICE DISTRICT
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County:
(1) That Sections 9-40 through 9-50 of the Code of the
County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are repealed.
(2) That repeal of this ordinance shall become
effective immediately after adoption.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
H. To Consider a Lease Amendment with T-Mobile Northeast
LLC - Midlothian
Real Property Manager Lynn Snow introduced the public
hearing.
Dr. Miller called for public comment.
6/24/2026 Page 89 of 98
Renae Eldred inquired why the county is leasing the
tower if it is on state property.
Mr. Carroll stated the county is involved in the
transaction because it is the county's public safety
tower.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the
public hearing was closed.
On motion of Mr. Carroll, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board approved an amendment to the lease of space
on the county's Bon Air Tower with T-Mobile Northeast
LLC.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
20. Fifteen-Minute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
All five speakers who signed up for this comment
period were heard under Item 16.
21. Closing Announcements
Dr. Miller expressed appreciation for Dr. Catlin's
attendance at the meeting.
Mr. Ingle discussed the data center zoning cases and
the fact that, even though the user was not
announced, they were well publicized and shared with
the community. He stated the cases have the strictest
proffers pertaining to water in the country. He
expressed a desire to publish detailed information
and timelines about the cases to the community.
Mr. Carroll discussed his community meeting about the
data center cases. He stated there is a lot of
misinformation in the community that needs to be
addressed. He further stated he would be asking
Google to hold a community meeting to answer the
community's questions.
Dr. Miller concurred and stated another challenge is
data center taxation. He further stated he was
looking forward to the community meeting.
22. Adjournment
A. Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of
the Board of Supervisors
On motion of Dr. Hylton, seconded by Ms. Schneider,
the Board adjourned at 10:44 p.m. to its regularly
scheduled meeting on July 22, 2026, at 2 p.m. in Room
502 of the County Administration Building.
Ayes: Miller, Carroll, Ingle, Schneider, and Hylton.
Nays: None.
6/24/2026 Page 90 of 98
__________________________ ___________________________
Christopher M. “Matt” Harris Mark S. Miller
Acting County Administrator Chairman
6/24/2026 Page 91 of 98
Citizen Comments Received Through the Comment Portal June 24, 2026, Board of Supervisors Meeting Comment Type Comment Name District
Unscheduled
matter
I found out the bad news that
Chesterfield County didn't
get it's TAP Grant to build
the new sidewalk along Old
Buckingham Road. Could
Chesterfield County try to
ask the CVTA if there is
anything they could do to
raise the 14 million dollars
as a regional project to save
the unfunded 17 TAP Grant
projects.
In my other attempt to try to
build sidewalks along Route
60 and Old Buckingham Road
could Chesterfield County
expand the Springline Tax
Increment Financing District
9 miles along all of Route 60
to the Powhatan County Line
and include the new billion
dollar data centers by the
Watkins Centers to harness
the large amount of sprawl
and data centers going in to
build sidewalks and
intersection improvements
along all of Route 60 and Old
Buckingham Road and Huguenot.
Road Once the bonds are paid
off for the sidewalks and
intersections are built the
great Springline Tax
Increment Financing Distinct
would retire after 3 to 5
years. Unless they want Bus
Rapid Transit from Richmond
to the Watkins Center.
Carl
Schwendeman
Midlothian
25SN1153 -
Marlbank
Farms
Residential
Rezoning and
Adjustments
This development is not in
the best interest of the
residents of Matoaca in South
Chesterfield. We do not want
nor need more housing, do not
want or need apartments that
will over crowd our part of
Chesterfield county. We do
not want development. This
will stretch the limits if
our fire department and
police in our area. Our
schools are at their limits
and cannot handle more
students. Leave this part of
Chesterfield county alone.
Cynthia
Nunnally
Matoaca
6/24/2026 Page 92 of 98
Unscheduled
matter
I urge you to consider the
serious impacts that large
data centers can have when
located near homes and
schools. I’m particularly
concerned about the large one
going on Moseley Road close
to the new schools and
several new
neighborhoods/existing rural
homes. These facilities
operate around the clock and
bring constant noise from
cooling equipment, increased
truck traffic, and the
construction of massive
industrial buildings that
permanently alter the
character of our communities.
Residents have raised
concerns about declining
property values, the loss of
green space, and the strain
placed on water and power
infrastructure.
Schools located nearby may
also be affected by increased
traffic, noise, and air
pollution from backup diesel
generators. Children deserve
safe, healthy learning
environments—not industrial
neighbors operating 24 hours
a day.
While technology and economic
development are important,
growth should be balanced
with the health, safety, and
quality of life of existing
residents. Once these
facilities are built, the
impacts are long-lasting and
difficult to reverse. I
encourage decision-makers to
prioritize appropriate
setbacks, stronger
protections, and thoughtful
planning that puts
communities and children
first.
Victoria
Sagstetter
Matoaca
6/24/2026 Page 93 of 98
Unscheduled
matter
I strongly oppose the
proposed data center behind
Old Hundred Elementary
School. An industrial-scale
facility of this size does
not belong next to an
elementary school and
residential neighborhoods.
The potential noise, constant
generator testing, increased
truck traffic, visual impact,
and long-term environmental
concerns are incompatible
with a learning environment
for young children. Our
community deserves
development that enhances the
area, not a project that
places industrial
infrastructure directly
behind a school. Please
reject this proposal and
identify a more appropriate
location.
Evangelia
Eckard
Midlothian
Unscheduled
matter
I am a resident of the Clover
Hill District. I am in
opposition to the planned
data centers in our county.
While this item is framed as
a standard public utility
upgrade, it is clear that
these infrastructure
expansions are designed to
accommodate the massive
energy and water demands of
the Project Loch data center
development on Otterdale
Road. Using the extraordinary
power of eminent domain to
condemn property and clear
the path for a private,
hyper-commercial tech campus
does not constitute a
legitimate public purpose. It
is a forced disruption of our
community to subsidize a
private corporation.
Bethany
Jaeckle
Clover Hill
6/24/2026 Page 94 of 98
Project Loch—currently under
federal review via Permit
NAO-2026-0182—poses an
unprecedented threat to our
local environment. This data
center will lock in
astronomical rates of water
and energy consumption,
straining our utility grid
and threatening the Tomahawk
Creek and Swift Creek
Reservoir watersheds.
Furthermore, our residents
are facing the very real risk
of inflated utility rates
being passed down to local
taxpayers just to sustain
this infrastructure.
We have seen the consequences
of prioritizing short-term
industrial expansion over
community welfare before in
Chesterfield. The historical
failures and mismanagement
surrounding the Shoosmith
landfill left our community
to carry the long-term
environmental and financial
burdens. We should be
learning from those mistakes,
not repeating them by
aggressively condemning land
for another high-risk
industry.
I urge the Board to vote "no"
on the exercise of eminent
domain for these western area
upgrades. Do not force
Chesterfield residents to
sacrifice their land, their
natural resources, and their
tax dollars for a project
that actively works against
our community's best
interests.
Thank you.
Unscheduled
matter
To the board of supervisors
meeting on June 24th.
Please please listen to the
community. We don’t need any
more data centers in
Virginia. We have too many
already! No one wants these
except the huge
corporations. Most of us
Sarah
DeBlasio
Midlothian
6/24/2026 Page 95 of 98
are moving AWAY from tech!
Please please say NO.
Unscheduled
matter
I oppose the proposed data
centers in the western end of
the county. They are too
close to our water source and
not enough environmental
protections are in place to
protect said water. Not to
mention these centers will
not pay their fair share of
taxes. Please do not let
another big ugly data center
be
built in Chesterfield.
Angela Cox Clover Hill
Unscheduled
matter
My name is Sarah. I am a
local and currently reaide in
Woodlake. I, like many others
in Chesterfield, are
concerned with the influx of
data centers coming to our
community. Especially without
a proper public hearing and
the growing negative media
following them like in Lake
Tahoe where 50,000 residents
were told to find a new power
source in 1 year. We have
many questions before making
such a giant comment in
Chesterfield. Firstly, there
is talk of an NDA signed by
the Chesterfield Board of
Supervisors with Google in
regards to a planned data
center in Chesterfield
County. Please state if this
is true or not. Some other
concerns invlove: will this
data center be like the
Amazon one off of Lake Anna
who is proposing to dump
their recycled water tanks,
what harm could these data
center tanks do to our water
ways like heavy metals/ anti
microb/ anti freezing/ etc,
that the creek they will be
drawing from is a tributary
to Swift Creek and the Swift
Creek Reservoir (which is
part of our drinking water)
Sarah Smith Clover Hill
6/24/2026 Page 96 of 98
and what impact it will have
on them, and not to mention
the rising costs to
electricity and depletion of
resources for residents? How
can we effectively keep costs
low and care for our
environment when we have a
landfill to clean up after in
south Chesterfield? How will
this effect wildlife
including the eagles found
around Woodlake? If these
data centers are not built
for those communities around
them, who are they
really being built for?
Unscheduled
matter
Public Comment regarding
Project Loch and Data Center
Expansion Concerns in
Chesterfield.
Dear Members of the Board of
Supervisors,
I live and work right here in
the Midlothian district. I am
writing to formally register
my serious concerns regarding
Project Loch . While I
understand the appeal of new
corporate tax revenue, the
long-term quality of life and
financial risks to Midlothian
families far outweigh these
short-term gains.
First, the proximity of this
massive, 340-acre industrial
complex to established
residential areas and local
infrastructure is deeply
troubling. Project Loch sits
nestled right between
Otterdale Road and Old
Hundred Road. This places a
massive industrial footprint
directly adjacent to rapidly
growing residential
neighborhoods and community
spaces like Old Hundred
Elementary School. Data
Centers operate around the
clock, creating a constant,
low-frequency hum from
thousands of cooling fans
Ethan Craft Midlothian
6/24/2026 Page 97 of 98
and backup generators. This
persistent noise pollution
shatters the peace of nearby
families, disrupts learning
environments, and directly
threatens our local property
values.
Industrial projects of this
magnitude simply do not
belong so close to our
schools and homes.
Second, the environmental
footprint—specifically water
usage—is unsustainable for
our district. Data centers
require millions of gallons
of water daily to keep
equipment cool. Committing
such vast amounts of our
local water supply to private
tech infrastructure threatens
our regional water security
and places an unnecessary
burden on the Tomahawk Creek
watershed, a vital local
tributary.
Finally, I am incredibly
concerned about the direct
impact on our utility bills.
Data centers demand
unprecedented amounts of
electrical grid capacity. To
meet this skyrocketing
demand, utility companies are
forced to build expensive new
power lines, substations, and
generation plants. These
multi-billion-dollar
infrastructure upgrades are
routinely passed directly
onto local consumers.
Midlothian families should
not see their monthly
electricity bills
artificially inflated to
subsidize massive tech
infrastructure.
We must prioritize our people
and our schools over server
farms. I urge the Board to
protect Midlothian, enforce
stricter distance setbacks
from our residential zones,
6/24/2026 Page 98 of 98
and demand transparent,
independent studies on how
these facilities will impact
our local utility rates and
water tables before any
irreversible action is taken.
Thank you for your time and
attention
to this matter
Consider
Dissolution
of the
Centerpoint
e-Charter
Colony
Service
District
Chesterfield County should
not get rid of the
Centerpointe Charter Colony
Service District but instead
it into a sidewalk building
machine. Such as it looks
like under the 5 cent model
it brings in
$200,000 to $250,000
dollars a year. At the least
it could be used to build new
sidewalks along Charter
Colony Road and replace the
suicide sidewalks along it
that are built next to
traffic going
60 miles on hour.
The new form of this district
is it should raise the 5
cents to 10 cents and build
sidewalks along Charter
Colony Road, Waterford Lake
Drive, Old Hundred Road,
Lucks Lane, Miners Trail
Road, Coalfield Road,
Queensgate Road, Watermill
Parkway, Gentio Road, Tredger
Lakes Parkway. Walton Bluff
Parkway also if they add the
water park to it along Genito
Road under the old rate it
would add $300,000 a year to
it but under the
10 cent rate the district
could easily raise a million
a year. If it's allowed to
grow down to Hull street and
taxes commercial and
apartments it could grow to 2
million a year and sun set
when all the roads have
sidewalks and pedestrian
crossings
along them.
Carl
Schwendeman
Midlothian