Loading...
04-08-81 MinutesBOARD OF SUPEBVI$©RS Mr, Daniel called the m~ting %0 order at the Courthouse 2~00 p~m. (EST). Mr. Dodd gav~ the invocation. Absent: Mr. O'Neill. My. Daniel s~=ted that a public hearing had been held on April 6, t981 ~o discuss the D~oposed oTdinance regarding the tax lePy on v~rious classes of properly for the Coon%y, He stated this date and time had been scheduled for comsideration o~ the ordinance. Thsre was nu one pre,eat to discuss this matter. On motion of the Board, the following ordinance was adopted: An Ordinance to ~stmblieh the Annual Tax Levy on Various Classes of Property fo~ tke County of Chesterfield Be It Ordained by the Board cf Supervisors of ~h~ County Thtster£ield that for the yeir be§inning on ths first d~y of January, 1981, and ending on the thir%y-fira~ d~y o~ Deaember, 198], the taxes on property in all the ~agisterial Districts of the County of Chesterfield ~ha21 be as follows~ ~ec. 1. ~a] Property and Mobile Hom~s On ~racls of land. lots or improvementm thereon and on mobile homem %h~ tmx shall be $0.98 on every $100 of or other businese, trade, occupation or profession, includin~ £urnishin~s~ furniture ~Dd gppliance~ in rental units~ tax shall be S~.60 on every $100 of the ~seess~d Sec. 3. Public Service Corporation Property (a) On that portion of ~he real 9state and tangible has been equalized as p~ovided i~ Ssc~ 58-51~.1 of the Code of Virsinia~ as amended~ the tax shall be $0.98 on every $100 of vhe assessed value thereof d~termined by the State Corporation personal proper~y of p~blie s~rvice corporations which ha~ not beep equalized as provided %n Sec. 58 of the Cods of Virginia, a~ amended~ the tax shall be $S.20 om every $100 of the assessed value thereof determined by ~he State Corporatimn Commission. (c) The foraEoin~ subseetioae to the contrary notwitb- public service corporations the tax shall bs $3,~0 on every $100 of assessed Yalu~ thereof. Sec. 4. ~achinery ~nd Tools bu~lne~ the t~x shall be $~.00 on every $100 assessed Mr. Daniel introduced Mr, Frank W, $heffield who had recently r~tir~d f~o~ zh~ Vir~ini~ Department of Highways and Trmnspor~a~io~. On motion of the Boerd, the following · as ¢dopSed and p~esented to Mr. Sheffield: Whereas, Mr. Frank W. Sheffield was employed by the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation on November 1, 1940, ~nd has been promoted on numerous occasions since that date; Whereas, Mr. Sheffield performed the duties ~sisned to him in a most professional and competent manner: and of %he ¥irginia Dep~r~m~Bt of ~ighways and Transports%ion on March 31, teal. Now~ Therefore, Be It Resolved that the Board of ~up~rvlsers ef Chesterfiel~ County does hereby express Ayesl Mr. Daniel, ~r. Dodd, Mr. Bookman and ~s. Girone. Absent: ~r. O'Neill. 81-137 "The School Boamd has proposed a budget in the amount of $78,273,000 which they are requesting that $45,g16,000 De funded item local sources. Th~$ ia a $6,116,000 lncreasa over ~ast year. After aareful analysis of tho eetlmated has recommended that ]dCa] funding oF the School Budget cannot increase more than $4,000,000, This will result in a total local funding of $44,500,000 or $1,116,000 less than recommended by the School Board, The basic question before the Board of Sapervtsore ia whether or not this reduction tn the School Budget can bo made without impacting basic sducatioa, a cursory look at the School Budge~ by the ~ounty Budget Director indicates that $789,000 can be reduced without any impact on the educational process, This nan bs ~ccom~liehed by holding increases down for non-teaching positioa~ and by controlling other costs mere efficiently, (See Exhibit I.) This is only $327~000 l~ss th~n the reduelioas re¢o~lea~ed By the Board of Supervisors. The Board Of Supervisors does not want nor do they intend to specify line ite~$ i~ the Schsol ~udget for reductmon. This is the responsibility and p~erogative of the School Board and being o~fer$d as suggestions for consideration. The budget reductions requested by t~e gokrd of Supervisors will not impact the recommended increases for teachers. The ~eaeher~ will net · 12-13% increase in s~l~ry which a 10% cost of livin~ adjustment. We estimate ~hat our teachers ia Chesterfield ~ounty will be the highest paid ia ~he Richmond ~etropolitan area next year. During the public hearing thoro were several statementm made that were not factual about Zhs Operating budgets el the ~choo] SyStem and the County OVer the past sever[1 years. The attac~od exhibit (Exhibit II) shows how the operating budge~ (exclusive of debt) of the ~ehool ~ystem has increased by 84.4[ while the County'e o~erating budget has increased 72.1~. The percentage allocated to the School Budget continues to increase and this y~ar it is estimated to do so by ]2,9~. Ourih~ the public hearing no one came forward to present to th~ Board o£ Supervisors any factual information to indicate ~he demise Of the Chesterfield County School System if the local chafe of the operating budget is to increase by only $4,000,000. Every member of the Board of Supervisors has a vested interest in the education of our children and three members currently harm children in the 8cboe] System. Nc member of the Board of Supervisors will ever take any action that they feel will be detrimental to the h~eic education of cur young peddle, Larger increases in the School Budget for the future mu~t be financed through ~dditicnal a~sistmnee ag the State level. ~e continua to hmve mandated educational progrmms which are not funded. These program~ either must be cut or the State must provide the neceusary funding. Al~o, larger increases this, a 1% tnoreame in t~acfi~rs' salaries would ~ean $450,000 or an increase oI 1.39¢ on the real e~tate tax rat~. Sound financial plannin~ is the responsibility of all local government officials, Chesterfield County will begin initiating a three year financial plan and I would like to ealZ ~n the Soh0o] Board to submit a three year financial plan ~o that we can take a eloser look [t the future tax rates that will bs required to sustain such a Dian. In doing this, I hops that the School Board Would look at such thinCm ss a In past years, che Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors aae responded frequently to the needs of the School System 81-138 year. Such additional appropriations ranged from a low of $106~000 in the 1~77-78 budget to a high of $1,800,000 in t~s ~979-80 budget year. (~ee Exhibit III.) Should thJ~ Mr, Bookmam mtated h~ ecn~rr~d with ~r. Daniet'~ statements. involved. budget b~ forwarde~ back to lhe County Administrator for Ayes~ Mr. Damiel~ Mr. Dmdd, ~r. Bookman and Mrs. Oi~onc, Absent; Mr. O'Neill. ~r, Bill George with th~ YMCA w~$ presen~ and ~ntrodueed the students who Would ~e p~r%icipatin~ in Student Government Day. The Bo~rd welcomed the sluden~5 and it was ca mo$io~ of the Bo~rd, re~olv~d ~h~t the following resolution be adopted: Where~s, ~he Mouth Richmond Chesterfield YMCA iS orgaaizing a d~y to allow high ~ehool students to p~rticip~te of County officials on t~s ?th d~y of May, 1981. by the ci~izgns. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved by ~he Chesterfield C~unty Board Of Supervisors, ghat ~he l~h d~y Of ~ay, 19Sl, the South Richmond Chestsrfietd Y~CA, ~nd e~lls attention Absent: ~r. O~N~ill. Mr. Meiszer stated this da~e and time had h~en ~dvertiaed for ~ ~ublic hearin~ to consider an ordinancs relating ~o Gremk Letter Fraternities aad 8o~o~ities, There wa8 no one On me,ion of Mrs_ Gi~o~e~ seconded by Mr. Bookman, the follo%¥inK ordinance wa~ adopted: An Ordinance to A~nd the Code of th~ County of Che~terfield~ 1978, as Amend~d~ by ~m~nding Seetio~ ~1-$0 Rela~ing 7o Greek Letter Fraternities (1) That Ss~ion ~1-80 of the Code of the County of 81-139 10. 11. 12+ The fo/lowing uses may be allowed by conditi(~nal use subie0t (n) Greek lo~er fraternities or sororities conjunction with Any college, un~vensity, or community Ayes: Mr. PartieS, 54r. Do~d, ~r. Boekm~n ~nd Absent: ~r. O'Neill. On motion o£ ~r Dodd, seconded by Rt. Bookman, the Board set the da~e of ~ 13, 19~1 at 2;00 ~.m. for publJ, c he~rings to consider the following: An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact SecZiens ?.01-1, ?.01-~, ~-01~S, 7.01-$~ 7.01 7, 7.01 9 ~nd 7.01-10 of the Code cf Zhe CoUnty of Chesterfield, 1978, as Amended, ~ad to Add Section ?.Ql-13, all Rolo±ins to the Rs~ut~tion cf Dealers in Precious Metals, 2· An Ordinance to Amend Sec~iO~ 7.1-1 of Lhe Code Of the County o~ Chesterfield, 1978, As Amended, Rsla~in~ ~n Establishing ~ Central Absentee Voter D±stricT1 3, An Ordinance to Amend the Cods of the County of Cheeter~ield~ 1978~ as Amended, By Adding Section 20-7.1 Aetating to Water Connection Fees for Outside Water Service. 4. ~nput and Co~mcnt~ on the Co~nunity Develepmsnt Block Grant ~ppliO~tio~, Pa~ Pro~ral~l PerfOrmance and the Ayes:- ~r. Daniel~ ~r. Dodd, ~r. Bookman and Mrs. Circus, Abssnt; Mr. O'Neill Yt was 8enernlly agreed to defer ~iecusaion o~ a 5ease for OPL AsSociates zt the Chesterfield County Airport until later in the day~ ~r. Daniel exe~sed himsslf from the meed:nS. On mo~io~ of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Giroae, tbs Bo~nd authorized ~k~ Counfy Administrator ~o ~ccept on bebxl£ of the County the bes~ offer for Sale Of surplus landfill equipment. Ayes; Mr. Dodd~ Er, BooRman and Mrs~ Oirone, Absent: Mr. Daniel god Mr. On motion of Mr. BoOkman, seconded b7 Mrs. Girnne, %he BOard approved and authorized the County Administrator to ~xecuLe any necessary documents for Kenbridge Buildin~ System~ who EUbm~tt~d the lo~ bid of $~79,920 (base bid i,cludinE a]ternate~ 3, 4 and 5) for ~he Construction Of the Dutch G~D Fire S~fl0n which funds will be expended from ~he BOnd Fund~ for this project. ~ye~: ~T. Dodd, Mr. Bookma~ ~nd Mrs. Girsns, ~bsent: ~r. Daniel and Mr. O'Neill. 3n me, ion Of hlrs. Circus, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Bo~rd funds to Mental H~alth mud M~nial Retardmtion Services for the ~eimburssment officer. ~ys$: Mr. Dodd, ~r. Bookm~n and Mrs. GZrone. lbsent: Mr, Daniel and Mr. O'Neill. $1-140 14. 15. Mr. Daniel returned to the meeting. On motion of the BOard, the follow£nU resolution was adopted: Whereas, It has been r~queste~ that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors by resolution take a position mn question of relocation of the Virfinia Association 0£ Counties' (VACO) offices; and Whereas, It is felt that the efficieocy and effectiveness of VACO Would be enhanced by physically locating in Richmond; and Whereas, T~e xelocatinn would enable the VACC personnel to be at the State Capital oR a year-round basis representing its member jurisdictions on de~isioas which w~Ul~ have a major impact. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that ~he Chesterfield County Board of ~upervieo~s unanimously eupport~ the relo~a~io~ of th~ Virginia Association of Counties' offices to Richmond from Charlottesville, Virginia. A~es; ~. Daniel~ ~r. Dodd~ ~r. Book~as and ~rs. Absent: Mr. O'Neill_ ~r. ~{eisser advised the Board of outstaading appointments, On motion of Mrs. Giro~e, seconded by ~r. Bookman, the Hoard mDDroved the requests for bingo and/or raffle p~rmits for the Chesterfield County Nursing gems and for C. E, Curzis Elementary School P~T.A_ for c~lendar year 1981. Ayes: Mr. Daniel, ~r. Dodd, Mr. Bookman lsd ~rS. Circus. Absent: Mr. O'Neill. On motion of ~rs. Giron~, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board authorized the Treasurer to change th~ Petty Cash Custodian for Community Development from Jeffrey B_ Mummy to Phyllis C, Burkey with the fund amount remainins the same. Ayes: Mr. Daniel, ~r. Dodd, ~r, Bookman and Mrs. Girone. Absent: Mr, O'Neill. Thim day the County Environmental Mngin~or, in accordanc~ with directions from this Hoard, made report in writinE upon his examination of Monae~n High School bus driv~ in ~idloihi~n District, Upon consideration Whereof and on motion of Mrs. Glrone~ seconded by ~r, Bookalaa, it is ~esnlved that the Men.can Hig~ School Bus drive in tbs Midlothlan District, be ani it hereby i~ established as a public ro~d. And be it further resolved that the Virginia Deparfmmnt of Highways and TrR~sporzit±on be and ~t hereby is requested to beginnin~ at Smnketrse Drive, State Route R770, ~nd running ~n a southerly direction fur .Ih mile nnd than continuxng in a northeasterly direction for .10 mile and then continuln~ in a northwesterly direction for .19 mil~ to tis back into Smoketree Drive, State Route 2770. This turnaround serves ss a bus loading and Unloading mtation for Monacan High School. This road w~s constructed 81-141 ~bsent: ~r. ©'Neill, This day the County Envir0~mental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Swift Creek Middle School bus drive iQ the Clover Hill District_ Upon consideration whereof~ and on mo~ion of Mrs. Girone, ~iddle School bus drive in tbs Clov~r Sill DistPict, be h~reby ia established as a public road. And De ~t further resolved that the Virginia Dep~rtmenT of Ht~h~s and Transportation~ be and it h~rehy is requested to t~ke into the Seoond~ry Systsm~ Swift Creek ~iddle School bus drio beginning at Old Hundred Bead, S~ate Route 6~2, and running ina Southwesterly direction for ,07 milo ~ud rhea in a northwesterly direction for .OS milo ~nd th~n Gontinuiag in a northeasterly direction for .06 mile and then coatinnin~ in a southeasterly direction for ,0~ mile to ti~ back into this bus This turnaround serves'ag a bus loadin¢ and unloading stat/on for Swif~ Creek ~ddle School. This road was consLruoted )ublic School funds, therefore, The require~en~ of the maintenance bond should be waived. And bo it ~urthsr resolved that the Board of right-o~-wa~ for this bna loop. Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Er. Dodd, ~r. Bookman 2nd ~rs. Girone, ~bgeet: ~r. O'Neill. directien~ from this Board made report in writing upon his .SS mile ~nd then ricing b~ck into existing Oxbridgs Road, State Route 2080, a distance of .tO mile has been altered, road, Oxbrid¢e Ro¢~, i.e.~ Section A of a~yf~ir Estates of .~ mile, be and it hereby is ~dd~d to the Secondary System of Highways pursuant to Seotio~ 33-141 Of the Code of Virginia, 1~50, as amended. in blue on tho alsrementioned sketah a tet~l dimtance of .20 Cursuant to Session 33~76.12 off th~ Code of Virginia Of 1~50, is amended. C) And be it further r~solvad, ~hat ghe Baard or Supervisors ~aranteas to ~ke Virginia Department. el Ili~hway~ a minimum of ~0 ~t~ ~gr this This resubdivision of part of Section A of Mayt'air is r~corded as follows: Hesnbdivi~isn of ~ par% Of Section A, Mayfair Est~te~ Plat Book Pa~es 47 and 48, August 30~ 1979. Ayes: ~r. Daniel, Mr~ Dodd, MF, Boekmmn and MrS~ 6irene. Absent; Mr. O~Neill. Tht~ day ~he Coungy ~nviro~e~tal Engineer~ in accordance with direstions from this Boar~, made ~sport in writin~ upon his examination of Able Road, Able Place and Holridgs Ceur~ in Holly ~idMe. 8et%ion 4, Clover ~ill Di~triot, And be it further re~olved that the Virginiz D~p~rtment tak~ into the Ssasndary System, Able'Ro~d, beginnin~ where th~n northeast .03 mile to tie into existing Able Road, State Routs 2187; Able Pliae, beginnin~ at its intersection with Able Road, extending northwes~ .14 ~ile t~ ~ cul-de-sac and And be it further resolved, ~hat the Board e£ Supervisor~ follows: ~ection 4, Plat Book ~2, P~g~ 24 and 2~, SeD~smbsr 28, 1~78. iirec~ions fro~ this Board, mzde report ia wri~i~ Upon his ~esended by ~{r. Bookman, it is reSolvsd that Rsxmoor Drive~ ~u~lic ,eginning ~ i~ter~ection ~ith R~xlnoor Plmc~ asd going .04 81-143 16,B, guarant~es to tho Virsinia Doper:meat of H~ghways z 5~ f~7 ..... righf-of-way for all of ~hese roads e×cept Rexmoor Drive ~hi~h h~s a ~0 ft. right-cf-way. This section cf Stonehen~ is recorded a~ follows: Section H, Pl.a~ BOOk 31, Pages 61, 8~, 6~ mnd 64, 7/11/78. Ayes: Er, Daniel, ~r. Dodd, Mr. Bookman and Ers. O~rone. Absent: Er. O'Neill. This day the County Envir0nm~n~al Engineer ~n accordance with directions from thi~ ~oard, m~de report in w~itin~ Upon his examination of Treely Road, Windward Drive, Dunkirk Drive, Overrtdge Drive, Greenbria~ Drive and Greenbrier Court in Greenbrier, Section 3, Matoaca District. Upon consideration whereof, and cn motion of Nra. Qiron~, seconded by Mr. Bookman, it is resolved zhat Treely Road: Windward Drive, Dunkirk Drive, Overridge Drive, Greenbrier Drive and Greenbrier Court in Gr~enbriar~ Section 2, Mato~ca District, be and Zhey hereby are established as public ronds~ And be i~ further resolved, that the Virginia Depmrt~ent of Highways and Transportatioa~ be and it hereby is requested tc take into the Secondary 8ymt~m~ Treely goad, beginning at the mad of Treely Road, Miata Route 1152, and running northwesterly .09 mile to the intersection with Overridge Drive; ~ndward Dr~ve, beginning at the intersection with Treely Road, State Route 1152, and running ~a~terly .07 mile to the intersection with Dunkxrk 0rive, then eonZinuing easterly .04 mile to the intersection ~ith Greenbrier Drive; Dunkirk Drive, beginning at the intersectxo~ ~ith Windward Drive and running northwesterly .1~ mile ~c the ~ntersection with Overridge Drive; ~reenbriar Drive, beginning ~ the end of Greenbrier Drive, State Route 1166, and running ~orthwesterl¥ .03 mile ~u the intersection with Windward Drive, bhen sontznuinE northwesterly .08 mile to the intersection with 3re~nbriar Court, then coatinuinE northwemterly .08 n~ile to the intersection with Greenbrier Cou~t, then oo~tinuiu~ northwesterly .08 mile to the intersection with Overridge Drive, then continuing ~orthwesterly .03 mile to end in a temporary turnaround; ~0verridge Drive, beginning at the intersection with Treely Road and running easterly ,07 mile to the intersection wi~h Dunkirk Drive, then continuing easterly .09 mile ~Q the fntersection with Greenbrier Drive, then continuing easterly .12 mile to end in a temporary turnaround; a~d Greenbrier Court, beginning at the inter~ection with Greenbrier Drive and running easterly .04 mile to end in a temporary turnaround. These ro~ds serve 67 lots. The County is requesting that the performmnce bond required by the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation b~ waived so am tn accept these street~ into guarantees ~o the Virginia Depmrtment of Highmays a 50 ft. is recorded as follows: Section 3, Plat Book ZO~ Pages 67 and 68, June 12, 1973. Ayes: ~r~ Daniel, ~r. Dmdd: ~r. Bookman and ~rs. GLr0ne. Absent: ~r, O'Neill. It was generally a~reed to table discussions regarding the refunding of ~ppliceton fees for the Board of Zoning Appeals since the County Code already addresses the quez~ion. ~r. Mu~y presented the Board with · proposal from the Richmond ~FO regsrdin~ funding for the second year of ~be ~ichmond area Ridesharing Pregr~l. ~e stated thmt Henrico h~d comm~t~e~ $1O,OO0 and the City Of Richmond and GRTC were ex~eote~ to do the same. ~r, Dodd inquired if funds had been budgeted fez this Qrosram. ~r. ~eiszer stated the £~nd$ had not ~een budgeted ~ut will be included in the budget if this resolutioo is ~pproved uy Zhe Board since the p~ymen~ will not be m~de until July [, 1981. ~r, Dodd i~disated his concern about the contingency 81-144 16.C. ~na~ ~ext year. On motion of Ers. Girone, ~econded by Mr. Bookman. the following r~solution was adopted: Planning Organization has sponsored a Regional Rido~haring Program, COMPOOL, Since March, 1980, funded by a one-year ~nd Transportation through the City of Richmond; and effective implementation of ridesharing activities and evmluation; and COMPOOL Program has been reviewed by the Richmond Arms Metropolitan govemnment bodies for consideration of lundinE by a combination Board of Supervisors, in conjunction with the governing ~]ec~tion Of funds for continuaZion of the Richmond Re$ionsl Be I~ Further Resolved, that th~ Chesterfield County Boerd the Fiscal Year 1981-]9g2. ~yes: Mr. Daniel, Mr_ Dodd, Nr. Bookman and MrS. 6irone. motion of ~rs. Girone, ~eaonded by ~r, gookman~ ~he Board ~eferr~d ~on~ideration ~f a s~reet li~h~ n~ ~he intersection of ~pic Rpad and Apex Road until April 2~, 1951. ~yes: ~r. Daniel, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Bookman and M.rs. Girone. ~bment: Mr. O'NeilL 81-145 i?. I. 17. of Buford Read and Sheldeh Drive with any associated cosT~ Ayes: Mr. Daniel, ~r, D©dd. ~r. Bookman and ~rs. girono. Abn~nt; Mr. O'Neill, Mr. Bookman presented ~he Board with ~ petition si~ned by 16 residents of Brookview Drive and Larkin Lane who agr~@d to eonn~o~ to public water if made avail~bl~ by the County. On motion of Nr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone~ the Board be Absent: ~, O'Neill. On mo~ion of Mr. Daniel, Seconded by mpproved the ~djustmnmt of ~pproprizt~ons for the fnllowin~ sawer project~ 1~ Sa0-5SC Forest Acres - Appropriate from $74-1-00640 (~dvaass~ ~y Developers) $~,500.0D to 3~0 t~70531-4393. This is the developer Participation from to project. 2. 7052-1SA - Kingsland C~sek Trunk - Appropriate from ~74 Surplum~ $4,387.84 to ~S0-1-T0181-2142. This amount alon~ with pa~ 0£ th~ co. Tin,easy already appropriated will cover The ~dditiona2 engineering due on this project. Absent: ~r, On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girmne, the Board amended the conditions approved ~ the July g, 1980 for Mr. Herm~n B. Ritter, Ritter Development, to construct and Point Subdivision ~s follows: l. To constract a privat~ pudding ~tation ~ud force mazn To maintain the pumping statlOn and to post a maintenance Lhe escro~ f~nd Would be transferred ~o Fund 57~ nnd be used for refunds. 146 V. Vi. 17, approvals and tbs pl~n~ for the pu~ping facility be ~pproved by ~he Sta~e Health Department, 8. That ~n agreem~nt~ as aPProved by the County A~torney · nd the Utilities Departmen~ be executed between the facility covering the m~iatenanee and a %end for maintenance be provided. 9. An agreement be recorded between Pitier Development and John Tyler To,ge, adjacent property owner, ~gres~ng that the County will not refund any of the cost cf constructing the sewer line from Ashton Creek trunk across Ratter Development property to John Tyler Towne's proper~y. Ayes: Nr. D~niel, Nr. Dodd~ ~r. Hook, an and ~rS, Absent: Mr. O'Neill, On mo~aon of ~r, Bookman, seconded by ~r~. Girone, the Board approved a sewer asreement for developer pgrtioipation~ 'to be included with Contract No. 7(S)0551~ Fores~ Acres, with ~ra. Thelna Louise Henshmw for the extension of an 8 inch construction cost is estimated to be $~,500 which she has agreed to pay ~n~ will be ias~lled by Piedmont Construction Inc. as a part of the Forest Acres sewer extension project. Ayes: ~r. Daniel, ~r. Dodd, ~r. Bookman and ~rs, Girona, Absent: ~r. O'Neill. On motion of Mr, Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Circus, the ~osrd approved Change Order No. 2 for Projec~ No. 7(7)9891, Bright hem occurred because the contractor will be using Clew pumps in lie~ of ~he specified Peabody Barnes submersible wastewater pumps. Ayes~ ~r. Daniel, ~r. Dodd, Nr. Bookman and Nra. Girone. AbacuS: Nr, O'Neill. On motion of ~r, Daniel, seconded by Ny. Bookman, the Board ~pproved the following Change Orders for Project 7032-25, Falling Creek Wasiewater T~eatment Plan~ E~pansion: 1. ChanEe Order No, 24 - Relocation oI pull box from the io$ide of the existing filter building to the outside eliminating th~ aced for an explosion-proof box~ (Decrease in ~h~ ~meun~ of $956.70). 2. Change Order Mo. 25 - Furnishing and installing nosings on concrete stairways to provide a non-slip aarfaAe and tO protect the steps from chipping. (Increase ol Ayes; Mr. Dan~e]~ Mr. Dodd, Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone. Absent: ~{r, O'Neill. ~r. Painter stated the Connty had received a r~quest from R. Stuart Royer& ASSociates, Ins, for payment of an additional engineering fee in the ~mount Of $36,000 for the Proctors Creek W~tewater Treatment Plant, Contract 7032-5, which was eau by the additional time involved because of the delay and ~roblem; e~used by the contractor not completing zhe project as scheduled Nr, Bookman inquired if the fee were reimbursable. Mr. Nicks stated that a dispute currently exists between the County and th, contractor regardin~ retainage ~nd alleged delay damages. After further discussion of the matter, it was on motion of Mr. Dodd, ~eaonded by Er. Bookman, resolved that this request be increasing 5he grant ~mount by $36,000. Mr. Bruce Keadews effer~ his assistance and s~a~ed that Congressman Thomas J. B~iley might be able to help regarding EPA. 81-147 VIII. 17. X. 18. Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Dodd~ ~lr. Bookman and Mrs. Girone. Absent: ~r. O~Nei].l. On motJen el Mr, Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dodd, tl~c Ih:~rd in the amount of $24,311.60; %ha~ $25~527,18 is hereby the County Administrator i$ ~thorized to execute ~ny AbSent ~ Mr. O'neill. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board authorized the County Attorney to proceed with condemnation pr0e~edings g~inst the property owners listed below if ghe amount as set Opposite their n~nes is not accepted. And be i* further Yesolved tha~ the County Administrator notify said property owners by r~gistered mill of the intention of the County to enter upon and rake th~ property which i~ to be the subject of ~aid condemnation proceedings. An @mergency existing, this resolution s~RI1 be and it h~rehy i~ declared in full force and effect immediately upon DassaEe. Jeanne ~. ~ud Hyland Hughes MSl-JCD/4 Ayes: Mr. Daniel~ Mr. Dodd, Mr. Bookman and MrS, Oirene. ADsent; Mr. O'Neill. Mr, John Hewitt erased ~he County had nmgotiated a counterof[er tQ purchase regd ri~ht-of-wmy for Warbro ~o~d fro~ C~dle and stated the se~oTi~ted settlement w~ not tn exceed $2,000 which any difference in thi~ cost and the $2,000 ~ould be pa~d in = amah s~ttlemeat to C~udle and Hell. On ~o~ion of ~rs. Girone, s~cended b~ ~r, ~eokm~n, the Hoard ~ Whinney for the year ended Jun~ 30, t980, ~b~cnt: Mr. Mr. Micas explained the proposed %sase u~reement for ~paee at the Chesterfield County Airport for OPL Associates. ~r. Dodd f~S and would like to see future contrao%u ~ist a specific charge. On motion of Mr. DodO, seconded by ~r. Bookman, the Eoard approved and authorized fhe County Administrator to execute a lea~e agreement with ODL Associates for 826 squ~re f~t of office space at the Chesterfield County Airport. Ayes: ~I. Daniel, Mr. Dodd, M~. Bookman and ~rs. Girane. AbsenZ: MM, O'Neill. 81-148 19. went into Executiv~ Session to discuss personnsl and real Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Bookman ~nd Mrs, Oirone. ASsent: ~r. OrNeSll. On motion of Mrz. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board ~djournod at 4~SS p.m. until 9:00 ~.m. on April 22, 1981. Ayes: ~. Daniel, Mr. Dodd, ~r. Bookman ~nd Mrs, Girono. AbSent: M~. O"N~ill. [lct~olas M, ~sis~-e~ ' 73- County Administrato~/ff Chai~m~ 81-149