Loading...
05-27-81 MinutesBOA~D OF SUPERVISORS EINUTES ~¥ 27, 1981 Staff in Attendance: ~r. Duniol e~]Ied the meeting to order at the Courthouse at ~0~ a.m. (EDST). On motion o~ ars. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the minutes of ~ay 19, 19el were approved us amended. Ayes; ~r. Daniel, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Bookrcnn ~nd ~rs. Girone, Absent: On motion of ~rs, Girene, seconded %y ~lr. Eookm~n, ~he Board amended ~hs minutes of October ~2, 1980, Item #8.D. to ~ead ~n follows whis~ changes the word "~reater" to "le~" in Secrio~ 2, first sentence, last word: "On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by ~r. Daniel, the Board: 1, Authorized ~1t applicutioa fees for County projects to be waived. PeTmits and Rpproval~ (i.e., buildiag, zoninK, erosion control, etc.) will still be required but will be waived on overall rmther lhan individual Authorized the County Administrator ZO ~pprove change orders not to ~xeeed 5% (of the total ~ont Of a~y project) or $10~000 whichever is less, Chan~e Orders exceeding the established percentage Or project category fund will require prior Board ~DDroval. Alt change orders mppreved will be reported to tho ~oard, (~.3.11 & Ayes: Nr. Dodd, Nr. D~aiel, ~r. Bookman ~nd Mrs. Girone. Absent: ~r. O~Neitl." ~yes: ~r. Dodd, Er. Daniel, Nr. Bookm~n mhd ~rs. Absent: Hr. Mr. Hedriek stated that ~he Ben Air Library branch was Monday, M~y 18, 1981. He stated ~tl six br~nche~ are now additional circulation clerk 2~ each br~nc~. Mr. Hedriek stated the u~interruptible Rower ~upply is in th~ final gt~ges of inst~llatien testin~ and zs scheduled for full operation on May 22, 1981. He stated this will prevent user department~ such ss police, fire and libraries from ~lr. Hedrick introduced ~r. K~rt Foer~ter~ recently @mDloysd Insurance R~sk Manager. ~r. Poerster ex~lained that he would hs trying to contain ee~ts~ Would be completing a survey on preper~y, its losf, et~, He stmted he ~ould b~g~n working with the CoUnty ~unetions first ~nd he plumed to work ~ith the School System beginning ~ext month_ The Board welcomed ~r. Foerster to the County. Wherea$~ The citizens of Chesterfield County take advantage of the park and recreation gystem~ Whereas, Suitable and positive leisure experiences are vital to good phy$isal a~d m~ntat health and enhance th~ quality of life for all people; Whereas, All citizens can enjoy self~rene~ll in the Out-of-doe~s ~ro~gh green ~paees and £acilitie~ in pamk$; and Whereas, All eitissns san fulfill thei~ poten~laI in th~ use of their leisure time through the varied individual and ~roup opportunities provided by r~creation; and ~ereas, Chesterfield County re¢ogaizes ~hat the ~fforts of profetei0n~l park ~nd rscreati0n Staff have enhanced services availahl~ to Chester£1sld CouaLp residents. NOW, TherefOre, Be It ReSolved that the Board Of tuRervisers hereby declares the month of June aS "~osreation ~nd Perks" ~onth in Chesterfield County. Ayes: Er. D~niel, Mr. Dedd, Mr. Bookman and ~rs. Absent: Nr, O'Neill, Ers. Sirens expressed her appreniation to the Parka ReCreation staff for the outstanding work ~nd planning for facilities in ~idlothiRn Di$t~ict. She stated the proEram ~r. O'Neill joined the meeting. ~r. Daaiel rseognime~ ~re. Rldout and ~r_ Conyers, sister and brother of Ms. Ellen Mae CoRyers~ who could not be present at the meeting. On motion of the Board, the follewia~ resolution ~as adopted; for 41 years, 3~ of which have bea~ spen~ zn the Chesterfield County Public School System; and ~hereas, Ms. Conyers has 9erved, specifically, the students of Thomas Dale High School sines 194~, Doth as a teacher of Health end Physical Education and Government, and will retire on June 5, 19S1; aad Whereas, Ms. Con,ers' patience: understanding and dedication to teachin~ have been demonstrated by her outstanding abilities to teach the children requiring individual attention and specialz~ed instruction. Now, Therefore~ Be ~t Resolved that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby expresses their sincere appreciation and gratitude tO MS. Ellen Mae Conyers for her many years of faithful, loyal and dedicated service to the County, specifically, the students; and 81-196 Be It Furtker Resolved tha~ ~his ~e~rd acknewSedges this recognition upon ~he permanent ~inute Book of the Unanimous Mr. Dodd presented the resolution to ~rs. Ridout and Mr. Conyers Mr~ Dedd and Mr. BOokman expressed their personal appreciation as beth ~ere students of Ms. Cnnyers. ~r. Hedriek stated this dmte and time ha~ been advertised personal property taxea that m&y be outstanding on any Mr. Bookman stated he did nog aErse totslly with the it hereby i~ adopted; County Of Chesterfield, Virginia, 1978, Be I~ Ordained by the Board o~ Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sec%ion 14.1-26 of the Code Of the County Chesterfield iN amended and reenacted as follow~: paymen~ of pe~Q~a~operty taxes' 9rereg~isi~e shall make application for license, upon forms prescribed by the issued to the tiosnsee parsuant ~o this ~rtiole shall be displayed with the state license plate ~t the froa~ or rear this article shall be attached $O the windshield, adjacent Failure to disDla¥ license plate~ or other indioi~ of issued under the provisions of this ~rticle shall be considered It shall he unlawful for any person to whom a license plate ~ssign er transfer ~uch license plate or other indicia of ~nner ~uch license plste or oth~ indiaia of the ti~ense $1-197 ~ registered motor vehicie, trailer or semi-trailer may have the license indicia aasign~ to another vehiel~ titled in such owner~ name ac~or~isg to the provislon~ O~ %~%S article which is in a like v~hicle claes ~s specified in sections lt.1-20 and 14,1-~1 and which requires an identical license fee upon application to ~he ~re~surer ~ccompanied by · fee o~ one dollar and surrender Of t~e old license plate er indicia. If s~eh other vehicle requires a ~reater license fee than that for which the license was ~ssi~ned, t~en upon payment of a fee of one dollar, g~d the payment Of %he difference in license fees between the two vehicles and surrender of license indi6ia, n~ indicia of transfer will b~ issued. No vehicle es taxable sh~lX be licensed ~nless and uetil the applicant for s~eh license shall ha~e produe.d ~ntisfaetory ewidence that al! personal proper~y ~axes upon owned ct previously owned by the appSieant, which personal Vote: Unanimous Nm. John O~Brien, resident of Midlothian District. stated that he gad ether concerned 0itizens waited until Nay when the attention of the Board because it would be the June 24, 1981 meetin~ in order that he might have of hie material and data compiled for Board distribution ~nd discussion. He st~ed they felt their resouro~s provided sufficient d~ta which woul~ sugge~ a solution to thi~ stzte~ there were approximately 3,000 reside~ts of the resources to help with this problem. ~r, D~niel stated he wms ~lso concerned with this issue but suggested the date of July 8~ 198I to which this matter be defe~od as he would be out of ~own On June 2d, 1981. ~r. 0'Brien stated that would Da~i~l~ the Board deferred discussion of leaf burning ia Chesterfield County unzil July S, 1981~ Mr. Frank Gee, Resident Engineer with ire Virginia Department of Highways and Transporta~ion~ was present to discuss the proposed 1981-82 Secondary Road Improvement Budget. He stated that the County would be receiving 60~ of the 1980-81 ~llecation which i~ appr0ximat~ly $1,~,000. He stated this figure was provided by the Secondary Roads Division. ~r_ Gee reviewed the status of projects completed, their deficits and the pFoposed method of ellminzting th~ deficits by utilizing the Beach and ~ash Road alloem~i0ns, He stated the deficita should be eliminated this year. It was suggested that the deficit not he paid thfs year hut paid over a period of years. ~r. Hedrick st~ted that by doing this, the ps,icy of the Highway Department which hss b~en to bid proJect~ if there exists 70~ of the funding could be ohaage~ and the Department could require tOO~ of the funding to be available. 81-198 b~r. Dmniel inquired why ~ix project~ may he allocated $100,000' whom that ~tlocation will not complete any omo project, He stated he felt it would best to pines all the funds on one project and have something that is completed mnd the public san utilize. Mr, Bookman slated that Turner Road is most importan~ as it he~ R IA~e traffic count and it could become ~ndustrialized. ~r. Gee stated he needed two approvals from the Board: 1. The method of financing the deficits; and available. The Board indicated their dissatisfaction with the allocation budget, seconded by ~r. Bookm~n~ re~clved ThAt the Virginia D~partmen~ of Highways ~nd TranSportation is authorized tc utilize funds for Nash ($280,910,96) and Beach Eo~d ($123,920.47), the town of Midlothizn ($49,94~.40) and she Enon Church Reid ($940.45) pro~ects in addition To the pl~ balance for the Walmsley Boulevard project ($79~g44.~0)~ the Hickory project ($42,663,95) and the Belmont Rcmd/Route 150 {$103,807.~5) to eliminate the ~efioit on projectm completed Mr, D~niel i~qui~ed if she CS00~000 were placed on one projeo~ whloh road would be re~dy for construction. Mr. G~e stated rk~z zhe Salem Church Road project is the only 5hie year. Er. D~iel inquired if Turner Road could be ~s the ne~t ~iorigy. 3lr. 0'Neii1 inquired where some of the roads ~er~ that h~d b~en %i~ted and ~ow are nog~ G~ st~e~ ~h~t ~ funds be~om~ ~v~il~ble, the priorities are changed. ~r. Mummy stated the County s~ff h~d rose,ended th~ the priorities be ~s Salsm Church Ro~d, Part 1. Salem Church Road, Part 2. Rockcrea~ Road 4. Buford Eomd. ~r~. Giro~e cta~ed than she did no~ feel Bockcrest nor BufoTd Ro~d were priorities mt this time. Nr. Gee stated thc% ~he Buford go~d Bridge projec~ had ~h efficiency r~ting of 4.~, and the rating is 0-80 with 0 heine ~he worst condition and 80 being ~he Mr+ Moo~ stated ~hm% the Turner Ro~d project cou]'d be very benefioi~ to ~he Coufity as i~ could be~om~ Commercia] ~nd it does kmve ~ high traffic coon%. ~ st~t~ he felt certain hs OOul~ Ob$~in t~8 mmjori%y of th~ right-of-way but would not attempt to, until he w~s sure Lbo projec~ would be aD,roved and w~s ~he ~irs~ Driority. After further i~ w~S On ~O~ion of Mr. 0'~eill, ~eaonded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that this discussion b~ continued in a work with the Highv~ay Department ~eDresent~t~veg which would be schedaled at a lmter date after the publi~ b~aring on June Vote: Unanimous ~rs. Giro~e inquired how def~rrin~ approval of th~ budget would affect two small projects in her ~rea. ~%lr, Gee ~t~ted he could ~ccomplish the two small projmct$ if tk~ Board did not approve the budget prior to July 1, t981. 81-~99 Nr. Bookman inquired if Tamer Road ~ould be mmprsved with Revenue Sharing ~unds whinh ~he Board might appropriate. Mr. Dexter Williams s~ated he would bare mdd~tional information at the June 10, 1951 meetin~ as well am a lis~in~ of project~. Mr. Bookm~n requested that Mr. Gee meet with Er. Kedrick to discuss improvemeet~ on Wootridge Road. Mr. Gee stated he wout( ~rs. Giroue inquired ~bout having the Eobieus Sch0sl road at Blanohard a~d Sollingbrook Drives. ~ study ~t the entrance to Johnston-Willis Hospital. ~r. Gee stated ~hat ~he Highw~? Department wms preparing ~n updated study ~hich included ~he hours ~etween 7:00 - 9:00 p,m, feasibility study for a stop light at the intersection of Route ~0 and Southl~ke Boulevard. Rrm. Oiro~e inquired when the Kishway Dep~rtme~t ~ould p~v~ the riEh~ turn 1~6 ants Buford Road ~t Route 147 (in front of Ben Air Green Office Park), Nr, Ge~ ~tated he would check discuss drainage ~nd o~her impzovements which might be Er. Daniel stated that he felt there existed a safety problem at ~ochinger and the Loadin~ Dock on Route 60. Mr, ~oo~man grass at P~oute 10 and Old Stage ~n~ ~t Trebly ~nd Hsrrowgate Chesterfield Avenue, ~r, Gee ~tated within the next week, Nr. Dsdd requested %hat the H~ghwmy Dep~rtment instzll a on Route 10 and Old Bermuda Bundred Road~ ~r. Dsdd stated that street lights had ~esn ins%ailed on Route lO ~ud Old Stage which should help ~limiaate some of the safety the feasibility of installing a traffic light at the intersectJ ~lr. Doniel requested that he be givon a copy of the traffic mud Chippenham. Mr, Gee stated he wc%ld send him a schedule ~ppropriatsd $105,000 from t~e Rural Hoed Addition Funds for the constyu~tiOn of ~arbro ~o~d from :he a~rthern are~ l~nd£ill Vote: Unanimous On motion of Mr. Bookman, $~conded by MTm, Girone, the Board ~t Juno 24, 1981, at 9:00 ~.m~ for m publi~ hearing to Vote; Unanimous roads to be ~akea in~o t~e State System_ ~r. ~cEl£ish explained that inspections were made ~y the High~ Depmrtmen%. the Utilities Department and Environmental Engineering, This dmy the County Environmental ~ngineer, in a0eoTdmnce ~ith directionm from this BOmrd~ made report in wPi~ing upon hi~ ex~inat~on of S~dberge Drive, Kathleen DTive, Gretchen Drive, Kathleen CouRt ~nd Chemin Romd in Grayson Estates, Section 2~ ~tuaea District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Nr. Dodd, seconded by Ers. Girone, it iz resolved that Sadherge Drive~ Kathleen Drive, Gretchem Drive, Kathleen Court and Chemin ~hey hereby are established as public ro~ds. And be it further reeolveO, t~t thm Virginia Department of Highways and TranSportation, be and it h~reby ~s requested to t~ke into the SecOndary System, Sadberge Drive, beg~D~iRg southwest .10 mile to th~ i~tereeO~ion of K~thteen Drive, then 8outhwo~t .10 mile to.a cul-de-sac; Kgthleen Drive~ beginning at its inter~eetion ~ith SadberMe Drive, e×tend~ng nor~hwes~ .15 mile to the intersection of Gretchen D~lve, then Porthwest ,11 mite tO thO inters¢ctmom of ~gthloea Cou~t, then ner~h~es~ ~09 mile to the ±n~ersee%iO~ of Chemin F~ad~ Gretchen D~ive. beginning at its intersection with Ka~hleen Drive. extending southwest .0S mile ~o a cul-de-sac; Kathloen Court, beginning at its intersection with Kathle~n Drive, extendin~ southwest .08 mile to m cai-do-eec; Chemiu Road, beginning at it~ lntezeection with Gr~v~$ Road, State Route 630~ ext~dins southwest .08 mile to the intersection of Ma%bloom Drive, then southwest .17 m~le to a de~d end. The~e r0ad~ ~erve 67 lots. The 8o~rd of Supervisors ~qu~ts that the performance bond be waived. The Board does hereby agre~ to guarantee the per- foxmaqce ef the ~traets for ~ period of one year from the time of official ~ccept~nee. 81-201 And be it further r~solved, %hat t~e Board of 8upervigorG guarmnteos to the Virginia Department of }ligh~ays a 50 ft. ri~kt-of-way fop ~11 of these ~oads. This section of OtaysoB This day the CounCy Environmental Engimeor, in ~c~ordanoe with directions from this Board, made repo~t in writing upon h~s examination of Ston~ R~ver Ro~d, Old Log Trail and Marwood Briv~ i~ Stonomill~ Section A, Clover ~ill District. Upon eonslderstion whereof, and on ~otion of ~r. Dedd. ssconded by Mrs. Giroae, it is resolved that Stone River Road~ Old Log Trail and ~ar~ood Drive in Clovez 5ill District, be ~nd they hereby are established as public And be it further resolved, t~a~ She Virginia Department of t~Re into its intersection with Elkh~rdt Road, Sta~e Route ~3~ extending southwest .27 m~lo ~o the intersection of 01d Log Tr~il~ then southwest .07 milo to the intersection of ~arwood D~lve; Old Log Trail, beginning at i~s inter.cozies with ~to~e River Road, extending southeast .09 mile thon turninc northeast .09 mile to m cul-de-sac; ~rwood Drlve, beginning at its to tie into exia~ing Marwood Drive, Stat~ Route 2618. Those roads serge 6S lots, And be it further ro~olved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees ~o ~he Virginia Department of Highways a 50 ft. right Of-way for al1 of th~se roads, This section of Stonemill is recorded mm follows: Section A, Plat Book 30, Ps~es 87 and 88. M~rch ~1, 1978. Vote; Unanimous This day the CO~ty ~nvironmentml ~ngineer~ in accordance wish dlreotiono'from thi~ Board, mmde report ia writing upon his exmminafion of HillsaD Lane amd Larkhill L~m~ ~n Country. Plaes~ ~idlethiaD District. Upon ~onaideritio~ whereof, and on mo~ion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by ~rs. Girone. iL is re~olved that ~i%lsap baas and Larkhili Lane In Country Place, ~idlothia~ District, be iud they here~y are established a~ public ~oads..q And Do ~t Surther resolved, thit the Vi;g~nia Depargmont of Highways and Transportation, hs and i~ hereby is r~quested tO take into the Secondary System, ~illsap Lane, beginning at intersection with Robio~ Road, State ROute 67~, and going ,1~ milo southwesterly to lhterseotioa with,Old ~a~m ~osd, State Rout~ O0~; Larkhlll Lane, beginnin~ at inter~ectiOn wiLh Robions Road, Stats Route ~7~, and going .17 mil~ southwem~erly to intersection wish Ol~ Farm Road, State Rout~ 905. These roads right-of-way for all of t~ romds. This session of Country Pl~6~ is re~orded Is follows; Plat Book 29, Page 49, August 26: 1~77. Vote: Unanimous ?h.s day the County Environmental Engineer, in aCCOrdance with dirnctions from thxs Board, made reD.r% in writing upon his ~xamination o5 P~c~ott Place, Puckett Cou~t and Gob~ Court G~nJto, Section D, Clove~ ~ill Distridt. Upon consideration ~hereo2, and on motion of M~, D~dd, seconded by HU$. Givens, it is resolved that Puck~tt Plane, Clover ~ill Distract, be ~nd they heresy ars established ~s of Highways and Transportation, be and it hereby is requested continues .06 mile easterly to ints~sett±on with Goby Cou~t, Puc~ett Cou~t~ beginning ~t intersection ~ith Pucket~ Place and going .1S mile northerly to z cul-de-sac; Goby Cou~t, beg~nnin~ at intersection with Puekett Pleas and going .05 Genito is reaord~d ~s ~ellows~ Section D, Pla; Book 35, P~e 40, January lO~ 1980, directions from this Bo~zd, made report in writin¢ upon his examination of Te~ri Lynn Court is Ben Air Estmtes, ~ent~on B, Midlothian District. Upon consideration whereo£~ add on motion of Mr. bodd, seconded by Mrs. Sirens, it is resolved that Terra Lynn Court in Ben Air Estates, Section B, Midlothia~ District, be and it hereh~ i~ established as a public road. And be it further resolved, that the Virff~nia Department of Highways and Transportation, be ~nd it hereby is requested to take into ~hs S~sond~ry System, Terra Lynn Cou~, bsginnin~ at interaec~ion with Old ~on Air Road, ~tate Route 718, an~ going .l~ mile nor~kwee{erly ~o a eul-de-sa¢. These roads ~a~e~v~e~p lots ~'lhe~Eoar~ right-of-way for this road. This section of Ben Air Estates Sea,ion B, Plat Book 31, Page ]8, April 26, 197g~ This day the County Environmental Engineer, i~ aoe0rdance w~th directions from ~his Board, made r~port ia ~riti~g upon bis examination of Stevens ~ollow Drive, Sou~h Stevens Hollo~ DMive, North Stevens Hollow Driv~ and Hollow Wood Court in Stevens Ho]lo~ S~ction 1, Clover Hill Distrint, Upon consideration whereof, a~d on mo~ion of ~y~ Dodd, seooBded by Mrm. Sirens, it is resolved ~hat g~evens Nollow Drive, South 8tsvens ~ollow Drive, North ~teveng Hollow Drive and Hollow Wood Court in Bretons Hollow, Section ], Clover Hill Distria~, be ~nd they h~r~by are established as public roads. 10. B. 11. 12.A. And be it further resolvcd~ that tho Virgznia Department of Highways and Trnnsportn~ion, be and it h~r~by iL requested L0 at its intersection with T~rnor Road, Stmte Routs ~O., extending nor%beast .04 mile to the inter$~cbion of MmrYh ~evens Hollow Drive and Sou~h Stevens Hollow Drive; Sou~h Stevens Hollow Drive be~nnin~ at its intersection with ~teveas Hollow Drive and North Stevens ~ollow Drive, ext~n~ing northeasterly .Q9 mil~ to ~ dead end; North S~even~ Hollow Drive, boginnin~ at its i~tersection with M~evens ~ollow Drive ~d South Stevens Hollow Drive, extending north .07 mile to th~ intersectio~ cf Hollo~ ~ood Cou~ ~hgn northe~ .13 mile to a d~ad end; ~ollow Wood Courb, beginning at zim interseotion wish ~o~h Stevens Hollow D~ive, ex~ending nar~h~e~t ,04 mile to a cul-de-sac. These roads serv~ 48 lots. ~u~rante~s to the Virginia Department of Highways a 40 f~. North Stevens Hollow Dz~ve amd South Stevens Hollow Drive and m 80 ft. right-of-why for S~ev~ns Hollow Drive. This s~ction of Stevens ~ollow is recorded g~ follows: SectiOn 1, Plat Book 38, P%ge 78, April 4, 1980. Vote: Dn~nxmous On motion of Mr. Dodd, ~econded by Mrm. Girone, ~he Board ~nd ~u~horiz~d the Actin~ Count~ Administrator to ~eMotiate snle of this unit and accept best offsr as permitted by SecTion S-lO Of the Code of the CoRn~y of Chesterfield as i7 is not economically femsible to auction this eqnipmenti Vote: Unanimous On motion of ~r. Dodd> seconded by Mrs, 6irene, the Board approved ~d authorized the Acting County Adminiszr~or %0 tko City of HoD~well, ~he County of Dinwiddi~, the. County of Prine~ George and Chesterfield Coung~. Vote: Unanimous On motio~ of Mrs. ~irone, meconded by Mr. Hookm~, the.Board appointed ~rs. Gerald ~. Y~ifle, Jr. to the Youth Services Comm~o~ z~pr~e~ti~g ~idlothian Dx~t~let, whOS~ t~rm is effective immedi&tely Rnd will expire On October 11, 1983, which is th~ unfulfilled t~rm of ~rs. Jm~e Ohly. Vote: Unanimoum on ~otie~ of Mr. Book,ah, ~econded by Mr. D~niel~ the Board: 1. Approve~ the installation of a ~treet lig~ nt the inter~eotio~ of Stella Road and H~ell~ Court with any District S~ree~ Li~h~ Funds; Z. Denied tk~ reqUeSt for a street light at the intersection o~ ~pin and Apex Roads Decnuse of neighborhood objections, ~idlothian District; S. Approved the installation cost of $~T8 for 8 str~t li~h~ the inter~ectio~ of Co,bill Road and Cyrus ~treet with this ~tmount to be expended from the D~le DistricZ S~reet Light Funds; 81 2O4 13. 1. 2.A. 4. Approved The installation oost of $175 for a street light with thl~ ~ount to be expended from %he Dale Dis~riat Street Light Funds; and Approved the installation cost of $242 for a Street light at the intersection of Quailw0ed Road and Bailey Bridge Road with this ~mo~ut to be expended from the Clover Hill District Street Light Funds. Unanimous Mr. James Zook, Chief of Comprehensive Planning, stated ~hat as a ~n~ition o~ federal f~nding for the Airport expansion, runways and minimize, to the extent feasible, the imBacL on adjaoen~ l~uds. Mr. took pre~ented tbs Board with the proposed a$auranoe~ to be submitted to the Federal Aviation is prepared and ~he public betting held. Mr. Bookma~ inquired stmted the Environmental Information document is now bein~ reviewed, the Board will review the information hearin~ will he held which should be June or July. He stated ~r, Hedrick advised the Board fhat ADAPT funding is being affected by the federal outs and that The County may need ~r. Merland Otto, Ralph Burke & Associates, sS~ed that the ADAPT fundin~ expired last September but e~p~cted to begin in August or Seetember, might be a one or lO year pregr~ but that the Federal Aviation Agency will m~proved ~he project only when funds are ~vailable. the Bomrd, resolved thmt the Acting Coun*y A~inistrator be Aviation Administration, as outlined in the information filed with the papers of thi~ Board, and furtaer stmff w~s authorized land acquisition Vote: Uaanimens Mr. Painter presentsd the Board with the sewer and water flnnnoial reports. (hi ~otion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by ~r. Dodd, the Board received the reports. ,~r. Col .qeaton was present and dissusse4 two ~lternntives for l~ne installation for the Holly Ridge Company. After further discussion Of this ~at$$r, it was on motion of Mr. Bookman, meconded by ~r. Dodd, ~he Board appl~oved the followimg water contract wi2h the under¢taading shat the developer p~oceed with tl~e i~tallation either lhrough the ease~n~ in ~he woods 0r ia N~Dy$ Brid~e ~o~d ~d further the Board authorized the Acting County A~inistr~tor tO e~ocato any document s: Developer: The Holly Ridge Company Contrac%or: Hawkiss & Dettor~ Inc. Total, Contract Cost: $53~593.70 Estimited County Cost: $35,611.20 -'~a~h refund for Offsite and Oversize E~timated Developer Cost: Code: 380-1-61542-7212 And further the Board appropriated $29,172.32 from ~63 Surplus to 3~0~1 61542-7212 (in¢ludtn~ a 10% contingency.) ~he Contract for thc Bright Oak~ welt giorage tank. ~r. felt it should be adequate. 0a motion of ~r. O~Heill, doauments for ConZract NO. W$1-49B, Bright Oaks well ~tornge tank~ to 2ydn~r Hydrodynamics, Inc.. who submlt%~d the low bid o~ $16~271 and farther ~e Board lppropri~ted $11,298.10 from the ~67 Surplus t,o 350-1-61497-439~ (including 10% ~ontingency.) staff w~s further advised that ~hould it be determined that th9 w~ll size is not adequate that this be bPou~kt back to the Board for further consideration. On motion of Er. Bookman~ saeoeded by Mr. Dodd, the Bo~rd approved the following adjustment o~ approR~i~tions for the I. Wel-48D, ~ount Blanco. Section 5, Block C - Appropriate $?00 from ~64~1-00640-0000 (Advances by Developers) to 380 1-61480-439S (Capital Project Fund). P~rmuda District Thi~ repYoaeDt$ the cost to ex~end a wa~er li~o tQ Mr. Keavy's property for which he has already deposited $700 with the County. 2. Wel-20CD, Bockwood Green Office P~rk - Appropriat~ $538 from 563 Surpluz to 380-1-61202-7212. This additional request ie made because Bore oversize lines were zdded than originx]ly estimated due %o actual field conditions encountered_ Clover Hill District. . Mr. O'Neill inquired about the waner ~ituation a~ the Reynolda Me,als buildin~ on Nhitepine Road. ~r. H.drick eta~ed he had material regarding this ma~ter which he would distribute to the Board. Mr. O~Neill ~xcu~d himself from the meeting~ On ~otion Of Mr. Dgniel, $~conded by ~r. Bookmsn, the Board approved and ~uthorized the Acting County A~ministr~tor to o~eout~ an agreement with Virginia Electric and Po~er Company to provide alternate po~er service to tho Falling Creek Sewage Treatm*n~ Plant, ~ubject to the County Attorney's approv approved for this service when the project was awarded.. Ayes: ~r. Daniel, Mr. Dodd, Mr, Book, aa and ~rs. Girone. Absent: ~r. O'Neill. B1-206 13. 13. 13, 13, 13. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. BOokman, the Board authorized the Utiliti~ Department ~o employ a consultant to design ~ water line from the Airport Industrial Pa~k to the existing line in B~lmont Road which project is estimated 50 cost $350,000 a~d further the Board appropriated $18~000 from 563 Surplas to 3g0-1-60031~2142 ~cr these engineering services. Ayes; ~r. D~niel, ~r. Dodd, ~r. Bookman and ~rs. Girons. Absent: ~r. O'Neill. On motion of Mrs. Givens, Seconded by Hr. Booknmn, tbs Board 1~27 $outha~ D~ive from Mr. ~ohn W. Pe~rs~ll ~a~il June Mr. Bookman excused himself from the meetinS. Mr. Painter presented the Board wi~h a list of developer Administrator, On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by ~r. Dodd, the Board authorized the Right-of-Way Engineer to negotiate wi~h the Marks Estate ~nd th~ LeoPard Farbert Company to acquire Ayes: Mrl Daniel, ~r. Dodd and Mrs. Girone, Absent: ~r~ Bookman and ~. O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Bookm~n, seconded.by Mrs. Girone, the Board authorize~ the Acting County Administrator ~o execute an agreement wzth Virginia Electric and Power Company (Vepco) H~rbour Points Road in Brand~rmill to the Bright Hope Absect[ Mr. O'Neill. Hr. O~eilf returned to the meeting. Mr, Ramsey presented the Board with budget changes regarding the parks bond projeots, On motion O~ Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Hr. Dodd, the Bo~rd approved: Di~trict/ProSect Point of Rocks Eccff Park Thoma~ Dale Chester Intermediate Bellw~od Elementary Total Bermuda District Contingency Into (Out of) P~-e-~cts 5,930 ~,420 5,025 (?~3) 414 14,076 (14~'076) 81-207 District/Project Clover ~i2l: Grange Hall Reams Rr~ad Elementary Ckalkley Elementary Honing ~lementary Providence Middle Clover 5ill High ~nchester ~i~h Contingency Courthouse Comple× Falling Creek Elementary D~le Pmrk ~emdo~brook Hi~ Salem Church ~iddle Contingency Harrowgm~e Elementary Cmrver Middle Mateaca High Ettrick Park Total Matoaca Distric~ Midlothimn Park Robiou~ Con, lex Midlothian Annex Midlothimm High C2e~twood Elementary Gr~enfisld Elementary To?al Midlo~hi~n District Contingency Requested Tran~fePs 1,490 5,212 (43,500) (21,7~4) ( ~317) 52,7~0 $ (59,594) 59159~ ~,068 1,389 197 10,72~ 542 46 14,$52 $ 681 747 5,986 19,200 61,129 20,551 · 61270 $ 114,564 -0 43~907 I~,459 343) 1,554 161 1,~14) 172) 55,903 (55~903) -0- 81-ZOS 14. Vote; Unanimous Mr. Hedriek presented the Board with a copy of the status report of the contingency account. Mr, Hedyick stated that the County had been formally notified that the roads in the following subdivisions had been Length Ashley Wood Subdivision~ Section B Old Correlites Ro~d - Beginning where mile northerly to intersection with Old Csrrollton Trnee then 0.08 mile northwesZerly to intersection with Glenmount Roa~. 0.07 mi. with Old Carrollton Road and going 0.0S mile easterly to a o~l-d~-sac. O.Og mi. Gle~mount Ro~d - Beginning at intersection with Old Cgrroll~on Road and going 0.04 mile South- westerly to tie into ~ro9osed Glenmount Road, Ashley Woods: Section A, beginning at intersection with 01d Carrollgon Road and ~oing O.03 mile northeasterly to tie into proposed OleDmeunt Road, Ashley ~oods, Section C, 0.07 mi, Chesswood 8ub~ivimioa~ ~e~zion A with Chess~ood Drive and running southerly 0.0~ mile to end in a cul-de-sac, again Rainwood Road, beginning at the intersection with Chesswood Drive and running northerly 0.06 mile to the int~rg~¢tien with Lost Forest Drive, then continuing northerly 0.04 milo to end in a ~ul-de-g~e, 0,19 mi. Shiloh Dxive - ~eginning at the end of State maintained Shiloh Drive, ROUTS 750, and northerly 0.25 mile ~n the intersection with Chessweed D~iv~. 0.25 mi. Lost Forest Drive - Beginning a~ the intersection with Ealnwood Road Hsd running ~outheast 0.OS mile to end iD a temporary turnaround, again Lost Merest Drive~ beginning Rt ~he intersection with Rainwood Road and running wemterly 0.02 mile to e~d in m Zemporery turn,round. 0,08 mi. Chesswood Drive - Beginning at the inter~eotion with Shiloh Drive and running easterly 0.06 mile to the intersection with Rainwood Romd, agmin Cheeswood Drive, beginning ~t the intersection wzth Shiloh Drive ~nd running westerly 0.0~ to ~ temporary turn~round~ 0.09 mi_ ~r. Ramsey reviewe~ With the Board the 1990-81 revenue and expenditures, a comparative cost analysis o~ short-term borrowin versus guart~rly ~illing for real estate ~axes, Justification for differential between b~i~ing inspection fees for residential versus 6ommerci~l permits~ comparison of water and sewer rates for Chesterfield and other jurisdictions, estimated ABC revenu~ ~nd proposed changes tO the recommended 1981-89 budget. 81-209' or manpower, Chief Pittman indicated'both were needed but The Board generally agreed to the following increases to the proposed FY 81~82 budget: 1. Volunteer Fire Chiefs request for reinsta~emen= the Fire Department Budget. $ 33,800 2. Dump,tots. 30,000 3. Reinstatement of reductions for Department of Nnonemic Devslopment. 36,400 4, General Relief, a Social Services program, restored. This, mat=hod with ~tmte funds would provide $50,000 worth of assistance. 13,0GO ~. Donation fo Chesterfield Quart*rD,ak League. 8. Nine additional Police D~partment positions. E75~000 7. Retain Youth Services Coordinator as full-time position. ~000 $401:200 To~al Additions The proposed budget to off-set the ~ncreases: t. The State Department of Health ha~ indicated a willingness to DiOR up positions currently funded 100% by the County. 2. Shi£~ing of costs for fir~ hydraats ~o the Utilities Department resulting in savings to F~re Department Budget. 3. Capital PrOjectS: s. Poli~e Firing Rangs: ~ot be funded at this ~i~e with already sppropriated funds transferred b~ek to General Fund. b. County Garage: Funding no~ be added to this ~rojeot ne~t year. Board generally agreed to the follewinE decreases to the Total Reductions Total Increases N~eded from Surplus (147~000: (100,000: $ 401~SO0 $ 21~900 Mr. Dodd stated that if the reinstated funds are included ia the D~partment of ~conomio Development's budget for the ~etropolitan Economic Development Council, that the County measure what financial benefits are betn~ realized and that the County not be requeste~ to contribute a larger amount each year. Mr. Bookmn~ stated he felt funds should be allocated to obtain matohia~ funds from thm Highway Depsrtmenf. ~. Hedrick stated that the only plsce available to obtain additional funds without there*sinE the budget w~s from the g~r~ge project. ~r. Dedd stated he felt this WeS necessary and should not be delayed. Mr. BookmaB ~tated the County a~d the funds could be ~tilized elsewhere at this point. He stated that the garage will cost ~pp~o~imately $900,000 tn build. ~r. Dodd 8tared he did not feel taxpayers money ~hould be used On the roads when the Highway Department has Been derelict in their responsibilities and that if Z~e ~arage 17, project zs bypassed, it will be discarded. Other members ef the Board ~$sur~d Mr. Dodd that the garage will he constru~ted~ ActinU CounZy Administrator should present the Board wi~h ~lt~rnative~, without in~reasing ~he budget, to f~n~nce $289,000 for roads which would be matched hy the Highway Department for Board review on June 10, 1981. the ~ar~e and the Bomrd: at budget tzme, could ~t~n for The Board adjourned for lunch ~ I2:S0 p,m, 81S054 ~ mobile home permit to park a mobile home on property which belongs to S.B.G. Realty Company, Tax Map Section 81-8 (6) Cres6snt Park, Block 6, Lot 4A (Sheet ~3). opposition present, (Al motion of ~r. Dodd, seconded by five years. ~r. Dodd requested that Et~ff prepare recommend~tions for 81S01~ In D~I® ~stsrl~I District, ~rket±~ Directions rezontng from A~rieultnral (A) to R~s~den~ial (R-9) Of 21.49 a~re parcel fron~in~ approximately 820 £~et on the cast lin~ of ~opkins Road ~md located approximately ~0 feet south of its intersection witk Conifer Road. T~¢ Map 85-1 Parcel 23 (Shee~ ~r. David Flunagan, repreeea%in~ the a~plicant, r~quested a 30 day deferral in order thai he might prepare a detailed plan for th~ a~es, ~r, D~n~el s~ted he ~0utd he out of to~n in ~0 days asd inquired if the mpplicant would mocept a 60 day defsrral. Mr, Flanacan etmted that was a~rsemble. There was no opposition present, on motion of ~r. Daniel, seconded by ~r. Dodd, the Bo~rd ~eferred coasideration of this reques~ uatil July ~Z, 1981. Vo~e: Unanimous a Conditional Use Pla~ed Development to permit retsil o~ h~u~ai~ed ~oods in a Residential (R-il} Distric5 nnd exceptions to paving requirements on a 1.~ acre parcel fro~tin~ ~ppro×im~tely ~O0 feet on Courthouse Road also treatise Cpproxim~tely 250 feet on Sxmb~r Ro~d and 10cared in ~he southwes~ quadran~ of the intersection of these roads and be~er known as 9350 Courthouse Road. Tax ~ap Parcel 4 (Sheet 51). 81-211 Mr. Ev~ns ~ae p~e~nt. Mr. Daniel inqnired if the conditions were acceptable, ~speci~lly the 18 month renewal clmuse. Mr. Evan~ stated the oondit~ons wer~ a~reeable, ~ere no opposi~ion ~resent. On motion of ~r. Daniel, oeoonded by Mr. O~Neill, this request w~s approved mubject to the following ~onditions: 1. This Conditional Use sh~ll be granted for the purpees of o~erating ~ handor~ft business. No other gOOdS shall be sold from the s~hject p~epe~%y. Only the first floor of ~he e×imting house shall b~ utilized for this business~ This ConditIon~l Uge shall be gr~nted for s period not to exceed eighteen (18) months from the date of approval, by the Board of mOdification~ Or sddi~io~ ~o the exis~in~ dwellin~ tO One si~n not to exceed eight (~) ~quare feet in ~rsa lllumina~ed. The faoade$ of the sign sh~ll employ 5. Aeeecs mh~ll be confined to 8amber Road. The existing to th~ property shall be prohibited from Courthouse ~o~d. end 6:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. No Sunday submitted with the applicazion shall he considered the 9, The ~bove ~tated coaditiea$ ~nd/or eE¢eptions not~ithstandin mi1 bulk requiremen~s of ~he Convenience BuSiness (~-1~ 10~ In con~unction wi~h the ~pproval of this A~e~: ~r. D~ie!, ~r. Dodd, ~r$. Girone ~nd Mr. Mr. Daniel ~nd Mr, 0~Neill excused themselves from the meeting, 81~031 In C1OV~T ~ill M~gioteri~l District, G~orge P. Emerson, Jr. requested rezo~ing from Agrioultur~l (A) to Residential (R-9) of a .5 acre parcel f~Ohting approximately ~00 feet on the west lin~ of ~onath Road an~ located ap~roximately 350 feet parcel Z5 (Shset 8). Mr. Jeff Collin~ wa~ pre~ent xep~e~eutin§ the ~pplic~n%. There was no opposi~io~ present. On motio~ of Mr. Boek~nn, Seconded by Mrs, Gi~O~e, the Board approved the request z$ yeoon~ended by ~he Planning Commission. 81-212 Ayes: ~r. Dodd, Kr. ~ookm~n ~nd ~ys. Ozrone. Absent: ~r. ~nie~ and ~r. O'Neill, 81S033 requested resorting from A~ricultur~2 (A) to Residen~iaI of 46.4 acres ~nd Office Business (O) of 13.9 acres plus a 1300 feet west of its intersection WiSh West Village Green Drive. T~K Map 62-9 (1) parcel 3 and Tax Map 62-13 (1) parool 7 (Sheet opposition present. Mr. Bockmm~ oo~w~ended the applican~ by Nr..Dodd, the Board ~pproved tgis reque*t subject to the following sonditions as ~eeommend~d by the Plan~in~ Commission: ~nd ~sxtual szatement submitted ~ith the application, dated ~arch 4, 1981, prepared by Lewis ~ Owens: Igc., sh~ll be considered the plan of development, 2. All publia ro~ds within the proposed Offioe Business · re~ shall have a minimum riSh~-of-~ny of sixty (80) feet. 3. In conjunction wi~h the granting of this request~ the Commission and Board sh~ll grant a twenty-five (25) foot exception to ~h~ fifty (iQ) fOOt buildin~ and parking . reduction shall only be permitted where the d~velopment h~s zn internal focus. The twenty-five (2~) foot setback plans shall be submitted ~o the Planning CommiSsion for Individual lot access shall be prohibited to Route 360, thirty-five (35) fee% alon~ ~oute ~60. This sign shall not be luminous but may be illuminated. This sign shell identify ~he development and the tenants therein. Other freestanding Signs and signs affixed to the building shall be permitted within the development provided Lhey are not visible to Rou~e ~O. Individual business signs shall be as r~gulited by the bulk requirements of the Office Outside sto~nSe shall be prohibited within th~ ©ffioe Business (0) area_ Individual lets withi~ the Office Zueiness (0) District shall net be recorded as a part of the s~bdivisi0n ~I1 parking shall be located to ~he rear of the buildings of the buildin~ necessary ~o serve the p~rking areas shalI b~ located · minimum Of fifteen (15) feet from the right-of-way line, 81-213 9. In the Bffice Business (©) area~ froni and terser ~ide yaris shall be tweNty-five (25) lee~ except where common Ope~ space lies between the.right-of-way ]l~e ~nd the lot line, the fr~n~ ~nd corner side setback requirement m~y include th~ width of the common t0. A forty (40) foot buffer sh~ll be maintained between tbs. Office B~sine~s (0) area and the Residential (R-12) area. ~xi~ting vegetation zhall bs maintained in this ~re~ possible and shall be supplemented where necessary to improvements, the buffer shall be landscaped in Landscaping plans dspis~in~ this r~quir,men% shall be submitted to the Planning Commissio~ ~er aDprovil in conjunction with schematic.plan r~view. Office BuSiness (0) i2, Front yards may be reduaeO to ten (10) lest on the a. Blo~k E - Lots 14 through 26 b. Block H - Lots 1 through ~ Block I - Lot 14 f. Block J - Lots I through ~ Block K - Lets 5 and 6 h. ~leck L - Lots 1 ~h~ouEh 10 i. Block D - Lots ~ through ? 13. Each residential 10% shall have a minimum of two (2) 14, A minimum ef ~welve (lB) feet of pavement sh~%l be constructed for the leag~ of the property gb~gting ~$. The cluster homes sh~lI b~ similar in architectural style tO the renderings submit%ed with Zhe application. 16. Prier to obtaining a~y building permits, a Corps of potential high risk to life and limb for this bassd on %he results of the Corps' Rouge ~60 median ~0 ~ll=n with the entrance roadway shall b~ in zceordanee wi~h VDH&T specifications permits. Vote: Unanimous 81S034 In Nidlothian Ragisterisl District, Lewis Sternheimer requested rezonin~ from Light Industrial (M-l) to Community Business (B~2) plus a Conditional Use Planned Devslopment to permit exceptions To the fiftF (50) foot setback requlremenf for driveways and parking on a 5.17 acre parcel fronting approximately 620 [eet on Providence Road also lron~i~g approximaLe]y ~90 feet on ~idlothian ~urnpik~ and located in the northwest qu~drnnt of the intersection Of these roads. Tax MsD 18-]5 (2) parcels 9, 19, ~3 and $~ (~hee~ Mr. John ~enson wk~ preae.t and stated ke weald like to amend several conditions recommended. He stated in Condition ~1~ the site plan dale should be 5/~/81~ ~n Condition #~, he would like the minimum pithing spaces read "142"; and Condition #8 shoul~ i~cl~de the words "proposal ~s~ the freestanding" in front of the word "signs". submitted a revised plan for the area. There was no Opposition Bookman, this requeal was approved as ~ecomm~nded by the Planning Co~r~is~ion ~ubject to the following conditions: 1. The below stated conditions notwithstanding the site plan pmepared by J. E. Tim~oas & Associates, datdd 2. All B-2 uses shall be permitted with th~ exception of the followisg: b. Repair ~ervioes A minimum of 142 p~rkin~ ep~o~g shall be provided. Fifty (50) percent of these spaces m~y be red. ced to a siz~ of eight ($) feet by eighteen (58) fee~+ ear ~paces shall be designed ~nd designated to large vehicular parking. 4. No other entrance/exits, other than those sho~m on the MaSter Plan sh~ll be permiffed. 5. A twenty-five (25) foot exaeption to the fifty (50) foot Dark~n~ ~nd driveway ~ethaok alon~ ~idlothian Turnpike sh~ll be granted. Nitkim the twenty-five (~5) foot setback, there shall be installed landscaped earth beym$ inteyeper~ed with other plmntings. A specific la~d~caped plan shall be submitted to the Ptmnning Commission for approval in conjunction with schematic plan r~view. 6. The sign proposal presented by the applicant sad attached to the Staff Report shall be the proposal for freestanding $ign~ permitted on thisprojmct. 7. The internnl layout shall be designed so as to facilitate e~my traffic movements ~i~hin the Site and to North Providence Road (Twinridge Lane). $, A minimum O~ twelve (l~) feet of pavement on ~idlothi~n Turnpike and a minimum of two 1maes of pavemen~ Item the aenterline of North Providence beginning af the norfhernmost driveway north to the northern p~eperty line s~all be constructed to State standards and accepted by the State prior to release of an occupanoy permit for ~n? of th~ si~e~ labeled cafeteria, spa and bang on the site Dlan. These frontage improvements are shown as Phase ~ on Staff's Ingress sad Eeress Improvemen~ Phasing Plln. 9. A minimum o~ two l~nes of D~vement from ~he cen~erline of North Providence Road begi~aing at the northernmost driveway 8ouCh to Nidlothia~ Turu~ike shall b~ 81-215 .State prior to the release of an OCcupanc~ permit for requirsments of th~ Community Business [B 2) District sha]i be applicable. 81S056 requested a Couditionzl USe Planned Development to permit a with exceptions to paving requirements in an Agricultural on the east line of Iron Bridge Ro~d ned located 1850 feet north of i~s ietersection with Whitepin8 Read. acceptable. There was no oppositio~ present. On me,ion of request subject to the ~ollowing oonditions a~ recommended th~ Planning C~mmission: I. There shall be no outside storag~ of any msterial or ~upplies. One sign, not to exceed sixteen (16) s~usrs feet in shall be pe~itted. Thi~ sign shall neither be nor illuminated. The sign shall ~mPloy subdued colors. Prior ts erection of th~ Sign: a colored r~adering shall Ail p~rking ar~a$ shall be looated to the rear of the existing dwelling or more speoifioally behind the rear wmll line of the existing dwelling. 4. All parking areas and equipment shall be screened from adjacent property to the north ~y ~ither vegetation, evergreen plantings or a solid board feece or ~ combination of the throe. A plan for this screening shall bs submitted ~o the Planning Commission ~or approval im conjunction with schematic plan review. Any mddition~ to the exi~tin~ huildin~ shall be cen~tructed of similtr materi~ls as the existing residence and shall be of the same architectural design. Any colors used on these buildings shall h~ subdued and shall be by Development ~eview. Only a sinEle access shall be permitted to Route At s~eh time that adjacent propsr~y fo ~he South develops for a similar use, this access Shall be shared wi~h that 7. U~le~s etherwise noted, this use shell comply with the hulk req~i~ement~ of the Office Business (0) District. This Conditional Use shall bs granted for a period net exceed four (4) yeers from date of approval. Upon detrimentally effected adjacent property, consideration may be given to renewal. iI iii F 9. All pmr~ing and driveway areas shall either be graveled or pavefl. $1SOB7 100 foot height limitation by 1139 feet in an Agricultural (A) Dry Bridge Road. Tax ~ap 14 (1) part of parcel 9 (Sheet 5/6). reply on this tower but he had not received it in writing as of application. 2, The site plan submitted with th~ application shall be 4. tn conjunction with the approval of this application, the Coma]issioD shall grant schematic approval of the sits pt~n 8ubmitted with the application. ~n Bermud~ ~Eis~erial Di~rlct, Bradford Brothers Co., Inc. requested g Condi~ionnl Use to per. it a contractor's O~fiCe amd storage yard in an Agricultural (A) Dis~ioE on aCr~ p~rcel £rontin~ approximately lO0 feet on the north line of Wesz H~ndred Road and located approximately 200 feet esst Of intersection ~ith Riverbend Road and better known as 400 Hundred Road. Tax Map 117-11 (2) Rive~bend, Section ~, ~r, Eam Barker was pre,eat representing ~he applicant and stated th~ conditions were acceptable, There w~s no opposition preeent. On motion of ~r. Dodd. seconded b~ M~. O'Neill, the Board approved n Conditional Use Planned D~velopm@nt subject to Commission: 81-217 A ten (10) foot buffer shall be maintained along the sha~] co~si~t of a six (~) foot high solid'board l'ence, height of not less than five (~) feet. The above conditions no~wi%hs~anding, all bulk requirements Of the General Bnsinss~ (B-3) District shall be The applioaat~ shall be granted an exception to the paving requirement. In Midlo~hian 5Iagis~e~ial Diotrict~ Grace Brethern Church requested ~ Conditionel Use to peumit a shil~ cate center in ~n A~ricnltural (A) Dfs~ict on a ~.74 acre parcel fronting approximately 700 feet os eran~esk Road also fronting apprOXimatel~ 400 feet on Rohious Road and located ia northwest quadrant of t~e intersection of these ro~ds. Tax Map 9-t3 (1) parcels 1~ ~9 ~nd 20 (Sheet 3). ~rs. Lori Wright was present representing the applicant ~nd opposition present, ca motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by ~fr. O'Neill, the Board approwed this request subject to the following conditions as recommended by the Plannin~ Co~is~ion: 1. This Conditional Use shall he granted to and for with taft land. 2. No more than ~hirty (30) children shall be enrolled~ to the site other than normal maintenance. An outside fenced play area may be constructed on the site if the applicants so wish. ~. Operation sAall be limited to the hcur~ between 9:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. 5. One sign, not to exceed eight (~) sqmaye feet in area shall be permitted. This si~n ~hall neither be depicting this ei~n shall be submitted to Deu~lopment Review for appzoval. No access shall be permitted to ~obious Road. Vats: 81S041 In Bermuda Mmgiszerial District, W. Ceurtaey Wells requested reaching from Agricultural (A) Of .29 ~o~es and Light Industrial 81-218 (M-I) of 2.71_ acres to Residential (R-9) of a parcel fronting approximately 750 feet on the north line of Old Bermuda Hundred Road and located approximately 150 feet east of its intersection with Oid Stage Road. Tax Map 116-16 (1) part of parcel 2 (Sheet 32). Mr. James Cox was present representing the applicant. There was no opposition present. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board approved this request for Residential (R- zoning as recommended by the Planning Commission. Vote: Un an imous It was generally agreed the Board would recess for five minutes. Reconvening: On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. O'Neill, the Board went into Executive Session to discuss legal matters as permitted by Section 2.1-344 (a) (6) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.. Vote: Unanimous Reconvening: On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board adjourned at 4:35 p.m. until 5:00 p.m. on June 4, 1981 at Meadowbrook Country Club to discuss legal matters in Executive Session as permitted by Section 2.1-344 (a) (6) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Vote: Unanimous Rich'a~d L.--t{edri ck Acting County Administrator Chairman 81-219