Loading...
08-12-81 MinutesAugust 12, 1981 Supervisors in Attendance: Mr. Harry G. Daniel, Chai~men ~r. A, Garland Dodd, Vic~ Chairman Mr. C. L. ~rs. Joan Sirens ir. B. ~erlin O'Neill, Sr. Mr. Richard L. Hedrisk County Administrator Staff in Attendance: ~. Ike Carmichael, Comm. Fire Department Co. Administrator Mr. Michael Golden, Sup. ~r. Jeffrey MU~zy, Dir. of Community Day. Env. Bnginaer of Utilitie~ Mr. Lane Ramsay, Dir. of Dr. W. P. Wagner, Dir. of Mr. Daniel called th~ meeting to order a~ the Courthouse at 10:00 a.m. On motion of Fir. Bookman, seconded b~ Mrs. CirCus, thm Board went into E×ecutivu Session to discuss legal maC,ers as p~rmitted by Sec=ion 2.1-344 (a) 6 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Vote: Unanimous The Board r~ees~ed for lunch. Prior to the reconvening of the regularly scheduled meeting, the Chairman of the Board held a Press Conference. ~e Stated the Press Conference regarded i~em$ =elatin~ to the appointment of a County AdminiStratOr and the Redistricting Plan for %he House of Delegates approved by =ha General AsseI~bly. The announcements were as follow~: Mr. Daniel stated "O~ May 13, 19~1, I a~ounced to the public that th~ Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors would engage the professional ~orvice$ of Kern/Ferry, Int~rnationai to assist in the search for a new county administrator. Today, I like to report on th~ progress of this search. Kern/Ferry was selected because of ±t~ brOad-based experience in assisting 1OC~I governments throughout the Country in hiring %heir chief executive o~isars. Xorn/F~rry has offices across the Country wi~h i~s southeastern headquarters ba~@d in Atlanta~ Georgia. The project team was headed by Norman Roberts and Jame~ L. ~ereer. The men,oars o~ the team offered ove~ twenty year~ of experience as consultants to local governments and in the last %wu years has contributed to the suceess£~l placement of om/Ferry focused their search on criteria established by ~oard of Supervisors for the position. Thi9 criteria included cot only academic credentials but also relative job knowledge @xperiense. A proven record of senior level administrative 81-341 sxpsriense in public managemenT, experience as a chief executive or assistant in a full ~arviea local government, e~Darlente and demonstrated skills in planning, budge%lng and finance, utility management and personnel development, end most importantly, knowl~dge of the Virginia State Laws relative to th~ County Administrator form of government hare in Chesterfield County, was Their selection process consisted of national advertisements as well as individual personal eontact~ with leading administrators and managers acros~ the Country. They received 74 applications which were screened against the established criteria for the position. The list was th~ reduced to 2~ candidates. After ex=ensive interViews by Korn/Ferry~ they recem~ende~ eight candidates to be further interviewed. The Board of Supervisors interviewed seven oendldatss for the position, one withdrew himself from consideration. The Board of eupervi~or~ rigorously interviewed each candidate and evaluated their credentials alomq with their relevant work experience in its selection process and recommended ~hat Richard L. ~edrick be offered the position of County Administrator. Mr. Hedrick received a Bachelor of Arts in Public Administration and a M~sters of Public Administration from th~ University of North Carolina which is located in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Mr. ~edrick has approximately tan y%ara of management level experience in Virginia local government. ~i~ career began in 1~71 when he became Administrative A~i~tan~ to the City ~anager of Chesapeake, Virginia. Between 1972-76, ~r. Hedriek was Assistant to the County Manager Of Henrico County. From 1976-80 ~r. ~drick was County Administrator for Prince Georg~ CouDty, Virginia, In January, 1981, Mr. ~edrick joined Chesterfield County as the Assistant County Administrator an~ since May 1, 1981, he ha~ been functioning in the capacity of Acting County Administrator. Mr. Hedrick and hie wife, Mary, reside at 13101 Queensgate Road in Chesterfield County. At today's meeting, the ~oard of SUpervisors will formally appoint Mr. Eedrick as its County Administrator. We w±ah him th best succeSS in his new position." The second announcement giv%n by the Chair~en was as "Yesterday, the General Assembly approved a redistricting plan for the ~ouse of Delegates that would include Chesterfield Count~, COlonial Heights and Powha%an in a three member multinumber House District. The addition Of Colonial Heights the originally proposed district was apparently made Under oressure from tho Justice Department ~ud results in an ~n¢onsitutional underrepresentation for the citizens of Chesterfield County. The plan approved by the General A~sembly exceeds ~he optimum population figure for 3 d,l~gates by 6.58%. Moro i~portantly, Chesterfield County ha~ grown by approximately 10,000 people since the 1980 census upon which the r~districting plan ie based, so the 6.~% deviation is in reality much lar~er. Nor does the approved plan take into oonsidera~ion that Powhatan and Chesterfield are two of the fastest growing counties in Stats and'that ba~ed on present populati0n ~rends the district would be entitled to an additional delegate in a few years. Chesterfield County wa~ grossly underrspresanted during the 1970'~ and the Board of Supervisors cannot p~mit that unfairness to continue through the I~0'~. At today'S meeting, the Board will authorize tho Count~ Attorney ~Q intervene un behalf of the County in Federal ~istrict Court to object to th~ ~ouse of Delegates Reapportionment Plan approved by the General Assembly." There was a question and answer period for the Press following the announcements. RecOnvening: 81-3%2 Mr. Daniel called the regularly scheduled meeting to ozde~ at th~ Courthsuss e~ 21O0 p.m. (EDST). Mr. Dodd gave ~he invocation. On motion of Mr. Dani~lj seconded by Mr. O~Neill, the Board appointed Mr. Richard L. ~edriek as the County Administrator at Stap 1 of Pay Grade 44 effective immediately. ~r. O'Neill stated that he felt Mr. Hedrick was as qualified as consultant firm of Kern/Ferry, International. 5e stated that h~ felt Mr. ~edrick met the criteria established by the Board and that he had excellent experience and professional attitude. The vote was a~ follows: Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Dodd and Mr. 0'~eill. Nays: Mr, Bookman and Mrs. G~rone. Mrs. Girone sta~ed that regardless of her vote, she would supper' Mr. Hedrick in his new position. Mr. Daniel congratulated Mr. Nedrick on behalf of th~ Board and introduced MrS, ~ary ~edrick who was presen~ at the meeting. Mr. Sedrick thanked the Board fo~ their support and confidence appointing him County A~ralnistrator for, what he felt, was one the more progressive jurisdiction~ in ~he Commonwealth. stated he accepted the appointment with the understanding that the Board wanted decisive and proqresslve management. ~e pledge~ to =he Board, his loyalty ~nd support; to the employees,, fair consistent treatment~ and to the County rosldents, an administration that would be responsive and cost effective. ~e stated he looked forward to a succsssful relationship with everyone. ~r. Leo Myers, a former member of the Board Of stated that k~ f~lt Mr. Hedrick was an excellent choice and that h~ had received many gOOd eommen~e regarding his qualifie&tionu and e~perlenca in management. On motion of Mr, Dodd~ seconded by Mr. Book,an, the Board approved the minutes of July ~ Suly 29 and August 5, 1981, aa amended. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Nedrick informed the Board that th~ auction of County vehicles and miscellaneous equipment held on July 25, 1981 was ~uecess~ul, that all was sold with ~he County netting'S36,404.50 Mr. O'Neill stated that he had voiced his concerns regarding the auctioning procedure. Mr. ~edrick s~ated that his co~o~r~s were beinq taken into consideration. Mr. Hedrick advised th= Board that the Resident ~nvlronmentaI Improvsment Contmittee for the Nursing ~ome would be holding a backyurd and bak~ sale on August 22, 1981, a~ the corner of Rout 1~ and Lord Road. Hs stated the proceeds of the sale will be used for Nursing ~om~ improvements such as ~lants~ pictures, ate which would ~ake the Nursing ~eme a~.csphere more pleasant, and he encouraged participation by all. Ne stated that Judy Bgach o activities which were beneficial to the Nursing ~o~, tko community, the patients and their families and he co,ended her efforts. Mr. Hedge stated that two ~taff people in the Internal Audit Department should be recognized. ~e stated that ~aZy Leu Lyle who had pre~iousty passed the CPA exam had re~en~ly completed th, S1-343 required additional work and wculd be receiving he~ CPA certificate and tha~ Mr. Ed aareh had also pas~ed the CPA exam. On motion of the ~oard, the following resolution was adopted! Whereas, Mrs. Lorraine Speke retired on July 31, 1981, from the CommiSSioner of Revenue'n Office a£~er serving the County since November 1, 1961; end Wherea~ Mrs. Spake has rendered a valuable ~ervice to Chesterfield County~ and Whereas, It has bean to the credit of the County and its citizen~ to have Mrs. Spake a~ an employee of the County; an~ Where~s, I~ is the ds~ire of this BOard to recognize her faithful service to the County and to spread this recognition upon the Miau%e ~ook Of the Board Of Supervisors of Chesterfield County. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that this BOard publicly reccgnlze~ the faithful and diligent service of Mrs. Speka and extends on behalf of its member~ and the people of Chesterfield County their appreciation and gratitude to Mrs. Spake for many years cf s~rvioe to the County. And Se It Further Re~elved that a copy o£ this resolution be presented to Mrs. Spake aed ~ha= thi~ resolution be p~rmanently recorded among the papers of thi~ Board o~ Supervisors o~ vo~e: Unani~ou~ The ~oard presented Mr. Ike Carmichael, Co~issioner ef Revenue, ~ith the resolution on behalf of Mrs. Spake who could not be present. On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: Whereas, Mr. Columbus Price retired on June 11, 1eSl, from fha Utilities Bepartment after serving th~ County since July 1, 1958; and Wherea~, ~r. Price has rendered a valuable service to Chesterfield County; and Whereas~ It has been to %h~ credit of the County and its citizens to have Mr. Price as an employee of the Coon%y; and Wherea$~ It is the desir~ of ~he Board te recognize this faithful service to ~he County and to spread this r~eognition upon the Minute Book of the Doard o£ Supervisors of Chesterfield County. NOW~ Therefore, Be It Resolved that this Board publicly recognizes this faithful and diligent s~rvice of ~=. Price and extend~ an behalf of its ~embers and =he people of Chesterfield COunty their appreciation and qratitudu to Mr. Price for his many 'ears of servic~ to the County. And Be It Further Resolved that a copy of thi~ resolution be ~Iesented to Mr. Price a~d that this resolution be permanently ~scorded among the papers of this Beard of $~pervisors. ~o~e~ Unanimous Fha Board presented the r~uolution to Mr. Robert Painter, Director of Utilitiss, 0n behalf of Mr. Price who could not ~t=end the meeting. Dn motion of the Board, th~ COunty Attorney was authorized to intervene on kehelf of the COunty in Federal Dis~rie~ Court to by 5bject to the ~ouee cf Delegates Reapportionment Plan approved 81-344 tko General Assembly on the basis that the plan violate~ constitutional right~ of the citizens of tho County and further conflicts with the Votloq Rights Act. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Ken Cronin~ EXecutive Assistant to the County Ad~inistrato~ stated tha~ staff had prepared a report COncerning alternatives to the current leaf burning ordinance. ~e stated that the repot includes information on how other jurisdictions are dealing with leaf burning, an analysis of methods which could be used to restrict leaf b~rning, alternative methods of collection, enforce the ordinance. He stated that basically the recommendations are: 1. Restrict leaf burning year round within ne burning zones ~xeept where the burning takes place at least 300 ft+ from any occupied dNslling. 2. Require residents in ~r~a$ restricted ~rom leaf burninG to b responsible for leaf disposal. 3. Designate the Police Department as the agensy responsible fo enforcement of the ordinance. He stated staff did recommend the no burning zones end presented a map oublininw each which was based on populatio~ density. He sta~ed th~ zones could be modified. Mr, ~edrick stated that ~his issue had to take into consideration whether or not this was health hazard and if it created a nuisance in the more d~nsely populated areas of the County. ~e stated that it h~ to ~e done ~n such a manner which would be enforceable, that another means of disposal would have to be addrassed~ that a reasonable determination as to why certain areas woul~ be allowed to burn and others not, otc. He stated zones were recom~gended a~d privat~ collectors could b~ utilized for disposal. He stated ~hase facter~ were the basis for staff's recommendations. Mr. Leo Myers was present and stated he was in ~avor of leaf burning. He distributed a newspaper article which in 1977 state: there was no basis for the belief that burning leaves was harmful. Mrs. Girone ~tated that she had monitors installed in Boo Ai~ during that time bu~ they did not receive a reading because it wa9 a wet season and no on~ was burning. Mr. Myers stated that he did not know e~ any court case~ resulting from lea~ burning and he did not ~eel this should be hanna=. He stated that he felt people should be encouraged to use the leave! for mulch~ etc. Mr. Mason Hayes was present and stated that he would speak when and if a p~bllc hearing date were established. Mr. Don sodgins stated thai he owns three acres of land and that h~ would like .burning laws to re~ain as they are. He stated that the 8 month curfew is ~nough. There was no one else present to speak in opposition to a public hearing =o ban or otherwise restrict £ur=ker the burning of leaves. Mr. John O'Brien stated he represented approximately 5~OOO-10~0O uctiv~ residents who were in ~aver of more zeutrictivs laws for leaf burning in the more populated areas of the County. presente~ an alter~ate ordinance for COnsideration than thai which was proposed by staff. He stated he was in favor of a simple ordinance which would restrict burning within 200 fi. of an occupied building, that there be i2O feat bet~een buildings before a person would be allowed to burn, Chat the Spring burnin, season b~ allowed ~o remain, and that there be a requirement the' the burninq be attended by a reliable person. He stated he these types of restrictions COuld b~ easmly enforced by th~ Pclioe Department. ~e stated that he did not believe zones be the proper way to prooeud. ~e stated that he would like ~h~ p~hlic hearing sea ~or September 9th. Mr, Bookman stated he fe~t ~here wars good point~ ~Uggested by staff and By Mr. O'Brien. He sta~ed that perhaps the two groups could ~ompromi~ and suggest one or~inan~e, He ~tated that he felt the current ordinance is restrlctiv~ enough but that the abusers are causing the problems. Kr, BOOkman inquired if weed stove~ shouid b~ considered. ~r. O'Brien sba%ed that the height of ckin~eys prevent the smoke from lingering and he wa~ not addressing that issue. Mr. John Smith stated tha~ he was net aware of how the current ordinance read but evidmntly it is not being enforced. He state that people do abuse the right to burn by burning in ditch~$, burning when leaves arm w~t, fanning the fire, etc. Mr. Mason Hayes stated tha~ h~ was opposed to settin~ a public hearing date fo~ further restrictions on lmaf burning. H~ state that wood stove burning is Dad in the winter leaving a hame across subdivisions. Me'stated if people would burn properly, stated before, a problem would not exist. ~r. Dodd stated that he felt some relief was needed in the hea~ily populated areas of the County, but he did not want the County to be forced in~o leaf collection. ~e sta~ud older residents Qf th~ Ctunty cannot affor~ to pay for leaf pickup, they cannot rake and bug l~ave$, etc. ~e stated that whatever approved must bs self-supporting. He stated he felt more consideration should be given Oo this matter. Mr. O~Neill stated he appreciated the calm manner in which Mr. O'Brien had handled this ismue. Ee state~ ~hat he did not feel the suggestions would eliminate the problem for all people with health p~Oblems. He stated that if peepl~ would learn to respect ~heir neighbors and burn when the weather conditions wer~ right, this problem would not exist. Me suggested that burning one week at a time he considered rather than the two, two month straight through periods. He stated he was also concerned with the iimi=ed ~neame of some people und how they wo~ld pay for disposal. There was some discussion that a committee might b~ e~tablished which w~uld combine all tAU ideas mentioned today, Aftoz furth~ discussion, it was on motion of ~rs. Givens, me¢onded ~y Mr. DodO, resolved that this request be deferred for two weeks to allow further consideration of the two ordinances suggested as ~ell as th~ need for a ceK~i=tee to be a~tablished to suggest a scllective recommendation On th~ i~sue. VOte: Unanimous Dr. Sullies pressured the Board wi~h two bond requests from the ~ehQQ1 Board for $8.5 million in Literary Loans and $26 million in General Obligation ~onds. He Stated the School Board requested that the Literary Loses be approved sub3eut to the Issue being approved by the voters. ~e mtatud this was requests because if the Bond Issue failed, the priorities ~¢O~ld need to b changed. ~r. Daniel stated that each project for the Literary Loans stool stand alone and nee be ~%lbject to any bond issue approval. He s~ated the p~ojects wer~ needed no matter what ~he other deeisio was. Dr. Sullies stated that was true, but that there ar~ urgen needs addressed in th~ bond issue and i~ that is not passed~ the priorities may need to be changed and the School ~oard wan~s the option to meet the urgent needs first. Mr. Daniel stated he had a record of supporting the ~eheol syste~ in Chesterfield County. ~e ~tate~ his views on the needs for th. school system were indicated when he ran for the Board and since being elected to the Roa~d~ he has supported an increase for the tsaGhers and supported the 1980 bond issue. ~e stated the deles- of the bon~ issue was attribute4 to many factors u~ch as the state of the economy, the justification of ~he needs, the questio~ as to whether or net th~ School Board had an alternat~ 81-346 capital improvements plan should the bond issue b~ defeated, its cost and impact on the tax rate and the question as to whether the County was seeking the least expenuive financing for those projects which qualify for Literary Loans. He stated on January ?, 1980, when the Board elected him as their Chairman, he reaffirmed his position regarding the school Ne stated he ~elt the Board should turn i~s attention towards another capital plan for the schools. He stated that he had requested th= joint meeting with th~ two Boards so that a plan could be presented to the voters which would meet the basic need~ for equality of s~ucation and facilities for growth. Be stated !that he felt th~ Literary Loann should stand on their own two feet and not be contingent upon the bond issue. Be stated the projects were needed and should be accomplished. He stated =he Board ~hould establimh a bond proposal that would incorporate th~ numerous issues associated with the schools, that it was the ~oard's elected ~uty to present to the public a proposal that they could support incorporating: 1. basic educational needs; 2. equality of educational facilities, and 3. facilities that meet the demand associated with population growth within the County. ~e stated the progress to date was--that a meeting with the School Board had been held in an effort to define the e~uea~ional nesd~ in t~o county; that c~ July S, 1981, three Literary Loan requests were submit=ed a~d after careful consideration and some co~ents~ th~ Board approved one ~roject for Matoaca ~lementary and on July 22, 19Si approved projeC%~ for Clover 5ill and ~=nchester ~igh Schoo!~. Be stated the minutes of =he meeting o~ July 22~ 1981 clearly stated that these requests are pert oi a program which the School Board would ba submitting. ~s stated the resolution that ha~ b~en given co Board states that we should only apply for the less sourly, less expensive money if and after the band issue is passed. He asked what relationship to each ether did the project~ On the bond referendum have to thouu listed on the Lit~ary Loans. Be there is no relationship. He stated this resolution casts doubts on the entire school capitalization program. Bs stated, for example, if the bond referendum is defeated, does that mean that the pro~ects limted in the Literary Loan request is not needed? Do we have an altsrnat~ capital improvements program if the bond imbue is defeated? ~s stated this was a COncern in the issue. He stated the voters will not be addressing a progra~ for ~26,000,000 but one for $34,560,000. He stated that he had never seen a request in Chesterfield County where a bond issu~ was presented to the citizens of the County indicating that you must vote for "A'~ before the County will eon~d~r doing "B" or if you do not vote for "A" yon will not get "B". He stated ~his is voter blackmail. ~e stated he felt the School Board was holding the Literary Loans hostage in order to obtain the bond funds. Ha stated he felt the County should not lcse the opportunity to apply for Lit=nary Loans at this time until a decision by voters has bee~ ~ad~ ~er the bond issue. He Stated the County Would bu losing the opportunity to obtain low cost money. He stated he felt these resolutions should be sent back to the School Board for a clear outline o~ projscts~ that th~ stipulation be removed and that documentation of the pro~ects for Literary Loan~ be resubmitted et the ne~t Beard meeting, for which there was adequat~ time. ~r. Dodd stated he ~otic~d several projeot~ did not make either list. Dr. Sullins stated that other projects could be submitted in the future by the two Boards for project~ at Hening, Enon~ Watkins, Harrow~ate and Gordon. Mr, Qodd suggested that this list be indicated to the Du~lic even i~ they are not On the program at this time for immediate attention. Dr. Sullins stated these projects could be spread ever two or three yearm so that the impact would not b~ aS great i~ approved by the two Boards. Mr. O'Neill Stated that it was felt =hat Wells Elementary i~ not utilized to its full capacity and Herrowgate should not be expanded. He stated he understood th~ concept of the school Board requesting that t~e Literary Loans be approved subject to the Bond Issue passing because the Literary Loans are intermingled with the the Bond package. He s~ated that thc Literary L~an~ would not work on their o~ without the package end if the Bond Issue is not passed, the priorities of t~e Literary Loans would have to bs changed. Nr. Daniel s~ated that just because the Board approves the Literary Loan~, it does not mean that the option be exercised iinmadiately. He discussed the capitalization proqram and ~tated hs did not f~el there was an appropriate one. Mrs. Girone ztaa~d that if the ti~ing wer~ different, she could supper% sending the resolutionz back ~ut wit~ the election so close, she felt it wo~Id be useless. $~e stated she felt the plan as presented is af~ordable and what the public ~ants. she ~tated that the cost which has been s~t~ated by ~teff for this p~ogram will increase tax~$ for a p~rsen owning a $60~00 home by approximately $39. She stated that boundary line~ might have to be chanqed, bu~ing, et~, if a ~lan is not apprceed. She sta~ed that citizens do believe in n~ighborhood schools. Dr. sullins reviewed the transferring of students which might have to 00our in each the elementary, middl~ and high schools if a plan ~s not Mr. O'Neill ~tated he realized people liked the neighborhood schools but looking at the map, this could ~0% easily be accomplished. ~e stated that schools must be built to serve the needs. Mr. Bo6kman stated that he did no~ feel the Literary Loans were ~eing held h~etage for the bond issue. ~e stated tha~ aL1 the Literary Loans approved previously were justified. He sba%ed this wa~ a plan for space n~eds. ~e sta~ed if the bond funds were not approved, tho Literary Leans Would have to re~rioritized. After further discussion, it was on me%ion of Mr. Se00n~ed by M~s. Girone, r~solved that th~ Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield Connty authorizes submission of applications to ~he Sta~e ~oar~ o~ Education by the School Board for loans from the Literary Fund of Virginia to finance ~onstr~ction for the £ollowing projects; after the $26,000,000 bond issu~ is pas~sd in NOvemJoer: Bird ~igh ~chool Meadowbrook ~igh School Thomas Dale ~iqh School Matoa~a ~igh $chooi Curti~ Elementary Ben,wood ~lementary Chalkley Elementary Crestwood ~lementa~y Beulah Elementary Failing Creek Elementary Davis ~lementary Ben Air Elementary $1,000,000 500,~00 I~000,000 ~OO~O00 600,000 600,000 600,000 7§0,000 600,000 600,000 1,000,0O0 Each loan shall not exceed $1,000,000, Will be ~s~d to construct spproved facilities, and will be repaid on a twenty (20) year ~ehedul~ at an annual i~terest rate of three per0ent 13%}. The Uhairman of the Board of S~pervisors is authorized tO sign any re~olutiens or app~ca~iQns requi~ed tQ camDlete such loans. ~r. Daniel Stated he was ~pposed to this motion and should the ~oard uphold his vote, he would then mov~ that the Lists be sent ~ack to the School Soard for clearer defining indicating ahab the capitalization program is in doubt. He ~ta~ed that it sould also have to include e justification. vote being taken: Ayes: Mr. Dodd~ F~r. Booki~sn~ Mrs. Girone and Mr. O'Neill~ ~ays: ~r. Daniel. 81-34~ stated the old high school will be made into a middle school as there is a n~ad for 1,0O0 middle school seats in that area. She stated to resolve any misunder~tandings~ the County is nat developer did give the County 50 acres of land for a high school site. ~he stated ~here is water~ sewer and roads available to the proposed school site in the Villa~e and they felt the need t~ take advantage Of the gift as the ~ocation is excellent but bs priced b~yond the taxpayers reach. Mr. Qodd s~aced that thi~ issue has bothered him in that the two Boards seem Co aqree and then disagree. ~e stated that he wa~ unhappy with :he press coverage as the two Boards do agree on 99~ of the issues. He stated that everyone will not be happy with this but we are addressing issues to update schools. ~e stated he felt this was as good as any issue that could b~ approved. Mr. O'Neill inquired about financing furnitur~ ov~r 20 years. Dr. Sullies stated the opera,ions budget could not handle this. ~c state~ soma of the furniture is long life, for example, labs, built in facilities, etc. Mr. O'Neill felt it best that this be ~e taken from the Operating budget if at all possible. on motion Of Mr. Dcdd, seconded by ~rs. Girona, be i~ resolved the Board of Supurvisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia: 1. The County School Board of Chesterfield County, Virginia, th~ 21st day of July, 1981, adopted the attached re~ol~tiQn requesting this BOard of Supervisors to adopt an initial resolunien requsstlng the Judges of th~ Circuit Court of Chesterfield County to order an election upon the question of the County of Chesterfield contraetlng a debt in the amount of twenty-six million dollars ($26,000,000) and issuing general ebliqation bonds of ~he County of Chesterfield in such amount to finance projects for purposes as sat forth in such amount ~o finance projectm fo~ school purposes as Set ~orth in such resolution. 2. I~ is hereby determined that it i~ necessary and advisable to contract a debt au the credit of thc County cf Chesterfield to the ~aximum a~ount of $26,000,000 for capital nehool improvement purposes, acquisition of future school sites; and such other school construe=ion as may be required by the actual educational needs in Cheeterfield COUnty, Virginia, and to issue g~neral obligation bonds =he County of Chesterfield in the maximum amount of $26,000,000 to financ~ ~uek projects pursuant to Chapter Ar%isle 3, Title 15.1 of tho Cod~ o~ Virginia, 19~0~ as amended, which said bonds shall bear interest at a rate not to exceed the minimum rate of interes% as may be permitted by law at the timm the hands are sold shall mature ia such annual or semi-annual inetalimentu, as may hereafter be determined by resolution of this Board, the last instaltmen~ of which shall be payable nut more than thirty y~ars from the date of such bonds, and said bonds may be made r~dsemabis before maturity, et the option of this Board, ~uch price or pric~s and under such terms and conditions as may be fixed by this Board prior to the i~nuance of the bonds. A tax sufficient to pay the principal and inter,st of said bonds aa the same mature shall %e levied upon all the property sub~ect ~o ~axation by said County. A certified copy of this i~itiai resolution shall be presented by the Clerk of thi~ ~oard to the Judqes Of the Circuit Cour% of Chesterfield County an~ the Judges of said cau~t are hureby requested to enter an order requiring the Judgee o~ Zlection to open a poll on November 3, 1981 and take the sense of the qualified voters of the County of Chesterfield on the question of contracting a debt in the B1-3~9 of the County uf chesterfield in eu~h amount for the purpose set forth in Paragraph ~ o~ this resolutiQu. 4. This r~solution shall take effect in,mediately. 5. ~he foregoing re$oluton was adopted by the ~ollnwiu~ vote: Ayes: Mr. ~odd, Mr. BoOkm&~, Mrs, Girone and Mr~ O'Neill. Abstention: Mr. Daniel beoauea h~ tel%eves there is no capitalisation plan. Mrs. CineMa inquired if e revised pay plan for th~ teachers would be considered prior to the election. Dr. Sullins ~tated hc would ~ubmit a n~w pay plan to the School Beard in th~ n~ar future but he was not sure that i~ would be approved prior to the ~lection. ~rs. Giron~ stated she f~lt the needs of the school sys~m wer~ threefold: 1, Lite~a~y LOans; 2. Bond Issue, and 3. Revised Pay Plan for teachers. ~r. ~ullins stated the funds that wout~ cover s revised pay plan woul~ be coming from th~ Board of Supervisors. Mr. Daniel indicate~ State funds were also included~ ~r~. Girone stated that before the budget process bega~ i~ December, she would like the Board to receive what was needed from the School Board for ~he Pay Plan. Mr. Charles Jackson stated that the members of the School Board w~r~ net together, the members of the Board of Supervisors were not tcgether~ that Mr. Daniel's comment~ r~arding the two resolutions , etc. w~re all indicative of divided action and tha~ no ene wcutd ~uppp0rt th~ bond issue ~nder these circumstances. Mr. Bookman excused himself from the ~eeting. Mr. Medrick stated that thi~ ti~e and date had been scheduled a public hearing to consider an ordinance relating to building fees, subdivision fees, zoning fees and site plan £~9s. stated it was staff's ~eCO~endation that this be ~eferred in order that it night be further discussed with the homebuilders associations. Mr. O~Neill stated he felt th~ fees indicated for au average building of 1,700 square feet should be Changed rather than chargin9 that fee when a hom~ ~iqht be only 1,100 or 1,4O0 square ~eet. After further discus~ien~ it was on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs, Circus, resolved that this public hearing be continued to August 26, 1981~ at 9:00 a.m. Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Dcdd, Mrs. Girone and Mr. Absent: Mr. Bookman. It was generally agreed that the Board would recess for five Dr. W. P. Wagner requested five additional positions to the Health Department Budget. Me s~a=ed the etat~ has agreed to fund 55% of ~he cost if the County will appropriate 45% which is $32,300 for thr~ nurses~ a sanitarian and: a clerk-typist, He sba=ed the po~itions were in the budget submitted to the Board and had been deigted- Mr. D~niel inquired if the County would receive money each year. Dr. Wagner stated ~atching money. Mr. Bookman requested that the sanitarian position be held un,il absolutely necessary. Dr. Wagner s~ated %hi~ w~e being r~quested because of a mandated program which would take effest in January~ 1982. Mrs, Girone ~tated 9he felt school nurses ~rom the ~ealth hold-thc-line budget and this is the ~irst month in the new budget year. She stated she was concerned that ether d~partments might request the same type~ of things. Mr. aedrimk stated that this wa~ consistent with the constitutional officers budget and changes that were made. 81-350 Dr. Wagne~ stated that presently there is 1 nurse for every 2~6Q children and this would bring the radio to 1 to 2,108 and the normal is about itQ 1,500 maximum. Ne stated one ~urse would with high school student~ and one with the handicapped program. Mr. 0'Naill stated he had received one call in Opposition tO thi request ae the citizen felt one nurse for three schools was adequate. After further consideration of this request, it was On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that th~ general fun contingency acceunt 111-1-81400-4123 be decreased by $32,500 and the Health DspartJ~ant budget account 111-1-09~00-2131 bu increased by $32,300 with the understanding that the hiring of Ute five positions be delayed until the use of nurses aides caul be ~xplore~ and actual data on sanitarians Compiled. Vote= Unanimous ~. Daniel requested that the COUnty Administrator use his new ~olicy in tkis instance to evaluate uaw position~ as absolutely necessary, On motion of ~r. Dodd, Seconded by Mr. O'Neill, the ~oard approved and authorized the County Administrator to ex~cut~ any n~cossary document~ for American LaErance who ~ubmi~t~d the bid of $2S5,772.00 for a 100 foot a~rial ladder for the Dutch Gap Fire Station with the u~derstanding that funds not.be encumbered at this time because it will be a lease/purchase s~tuation over ~ 5 year Defied aJ~d financing will be arranged at ti~e of delivery which will be August, !9~2. It ie noted that Mack Trucks submitted a lower bid hut because o~ the subcontracting of portions of ~he equipment, it would m,an dlvidod responsibility for itc operation and warranty. vote: Unanimous Mrs. Girone stated that sh~ under,toad Mr. John Smith would be donating land at ~ Midlothien Fire Station. The County Administrator was directed to write a letter of appreciation~ ~r. ~ica~ presented the Board with a re~uesu from the Community Benefits Corporation for a music festival permit for a bluegrass festival at the County Fairgrounds. Ne stated that th~ COunty did experienoe some problems with this same group last year when a similar type of requos= was submi=ted. He stated that %hers wore some administrative problems which wer~ eventually calved but no problems were experienced with the Police Department or other $~ch services. The President of the Corporation stated that' two festivals have been held in the County and the first was handled in good manner ~e ~tated th~ second involved a time constraint and ~here were some minor a~m~nistrative problems. ~e stated he would work wit~ tho County in any way necessary. Mr. Micas stated that solicitors were indicatin~ proceeds would be,received by the local police department, the tickets indicated tho sponsorship bi the County which as of this time had not been approved, and tickets were already being sold. ~r. O'Neill questioned who the client was for this festival. Th~ P~esident of the Corporation stated it was for the Police Association of Virqinia whos~ ~ain membership wa~ in th~ Tidewater ar~a. Mr. O~NOiI2 voiced his concern that funds would be solicited from thi~ a~ea for other publio forces and he state{ he did not believe in ~olicitations for public employees as a rule. Mr. Dodd in~uired how much was anticipated ~o be collected for the Police ASsociatio~ Of Virginia. The President of the Corporation indicated about $3,000-$5~0~0 which was aDproximatel 81-351 ll.A, ll.B. ll.C. 17% of the money generated. Mr. Hedrick stat~8 hi~ concern r~gardinq the fact tha~ they are indicating that the County sanctions this venture, that thCs will bene£it a local police department and the general misinformation ~¢in9 given to the public. After furthez discussion oX the matter, it WaS On motion of Mr. O'Neill, ~¢onded by Mrs. Girone, resolved ~hat this re~uest be denied. The President of the Corporation ~tatmd that he woul~ need some t~me to notify the people who had purchased the ticketn of aD alternate location. On motion of Mr. Bookman~ seconded by Mrs. ~iro~e, the Board approv~ an~ authorized the ~ounty A~linistrater to execute any necessary documents for Lee By Paving Ce~poration who ~ubmitted the low ~id of $25~823 for renovation and resuzfacing of four tennis courts at Cleve~ ~ill Bigh School, which funds are to be taken from the bond funds for this purpose. vot~: Unanimous ~r. Nick Kerniek o~ the South A. M~ ~iQn$ Club presented the Board with a donation of $1,50~ to be used towards th~ play~round area at Huguenot Park. He ~t~ted that their club donates funds to such organizations as the Old Dominion Eye Bank, the ~anchester Rescue Squa~, ets. ~e stated becauee of the County'~ budget constraints this year and th~ ~mina~ion of the playground at Huguenot they wo~ld lika to contribute to the purchase of equipment to be installed a~ thie location. He sta~ed a £em~ivaL was held in the CoUnty and these ~onies are a part of those proceeds. ~lrs. Girone accepted the donation on behalf OX the County and it was generally a~reed that a sign acknowledging th~±r contribution be installed in th~ park. On motion of ~r. O'neill, seconded ~y Mr. Dodd, th~ Board aD,roved and authorized th~ Count~ Administrator to execute any necessary documents for B~aoRs and Company who submitted the 1Ow bid in the amount of $33,552 for construction of a restroom facility at Ettrick Park which funds will come from t~e bond funds for this project. Mr. Micas stated that on June i~, 1~81, the State Corporation Commission ©fder~d GRTC to pickup and discharge passengers along Eugu~no~ Road in the county as part of its route serving ~ha Old Gun/Stoney Point Road area of the ci:y. Me sta~ed evidently several citizens complained that th~ original prohibiting pickups and discharges in the County on ~RTC's fa~ southwestern route in the =ity was creating safety problems and unnecessary inconvenience to the riders. Ha stated that the Richmond City Charter requires the consent, of the governinq bod~ of all political mubdivision~ in which GRTC upstates, for any pickup/discharge locations. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookma~, the Board approved th~ following: Outbound Stops~ Foreut Hill Avenue at Brofes$ional DriVe (~arsid~) 2. Forest Hill Avenue at Anwell Drive 3. Forest Rill Avenue and Chocktaw Road {fareide) 4. Forest ~ilI Avenue and McRau Road Inbound Stops~ Buford Road ut entrance to Southern Bank with the location cha~ged a little farther north or south so as not to be in the narrow point of the roadway 8Z-352 2. Forest Hill Avenue at Chocktaw Road Inearsid~) 3. Forest Hill Avenue at Anwell Drive (farside) 4. Far,ida of drive at S133 For~h Hill Avenue (Carey Building) Vote: Unanimou~ ~. Daniel stated this approval should not be construed that th~ County supports GRTC as it is only being done to sliminate inconvenience to rider~ on an established bus route. This day the County Environmental Engineer in accordance with directions frum this Board, ma~e report in writing upon his examination of ~hadymigt DrivE, Shadymist Court, woodygha~e Circle, Shadymist ?erra~ and Treewoed La~e in Providence Pines, Clover Hill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. O~Neill, it i~ resolved that ~hadymi~t Drive, Shadymis~ Court, Woodysha~e Circle, 8hady~i~t T~rrace and Treewood Lane in Providence Pines, Clover ~ill District, be and they hersby ars established a~ public roads. And be it further resolved, that th~ Virginia ~epartment of Highways and Transportation, be and i= hereby is requested to taka into the Secondary Sy~tsm, Shadymi~t Drive, beginning at its intersection with South Providence Road, State ROUt~ 687, extending southeast .07 mil~ to the intersection of Shadymist Court, then eas~ .06 mile to the intersection of Circle, them ~outh~agt .09 mile to the intersection sf Shadymist Terrace, then southeast .08 mile to the i~hersection Of Lane, then southeast .03 mile to a temporary turnaround; ghadymist Court, beginning at its intersection with Shadymigt Drive, extending north .0% mile to a cul-de-sac; Woodyshad~ Circle, beginning at its inter,action with shadymist Drive, sxte~ding southeast .12 mile CO a eel-de-sas; Shadymist Terrace, beginning at its intersectio~ with Zhadymi$= Drive, extending n~rtheast .05 mile to a col-de-uae; Treewood Lane, beginning at its intersection with Shaydmi~t DriVe, extending northeast .09 mile to a temporary t~naround and extending ~euthw~$= .07 mile to a temporary turn,round. These roads serve 79 lets. A~d be it further resolved, that the Beard of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Depar~ent of ~ighways right-of-way ~or all of the~e roads except Treewood Lane which has a 50 ft. right-of-way and Shadymist Drive, whareb~ we guarantee a variable 5~ ft. to S0 ft. right-of-way. Providence Pines is recorded a~ ~ollows: Plat Book AO, Pages 58 and 59~ Fsbruary 1, 1978. Vote: Unanlmou~ This day the County EnviMo~ental Engineer~ in accordance with direotions from %his Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Black Oak ROa~, Der Oak Lane and Bur Oak Court in Brentwood, Sectio~ A~ Dale District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by ~r. O'Neill, it is re~olved that Black oak Road, Bur Oak Lane and Euz Oak Court in Brmntwood, S~ctio~ A, Dale District, be and they her=by are established as public roads. And be it ~urth~r resolved, that the Virginia D~ps~ent of Highwaym and Transportation, b~ and it hereby is requested to ~ke into the Secondary Sy~hem~ Elack Oak Road, b~q%nning intersection with Salem Church Road~ State Route 642, and rennin, northeasterly .07 mile to the inter~ctiOn with Bur Oak Lan~, then continuing northeasterly .17 mile to the intersection with ~elfield Road~ then continuing easterly .21 mile tu end in a cul-de-sac; Bur Oak Lane, beginning at the inter~ectlon with Black Oak Road and running northwesterly .05 mile ~o end in a cul-de-sac, again, Bur Oak Lan~, beginning at th~'interseotion with Black Oak Roa~ and running easterly .07 mile to the 81-353 mils to end in a cul-de-sac; Bur Oak Cou~£, beginning at the intersection with Bur Oak Lane and running northeasterly .g6 mil~ to end in a cul-de-sac. These roads serve 78 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supexvisor~ guarantees to the Virginia Departman~ of sighways a 50 ft. right-of-way for all of these roads. This Section of Brentwood is recorded as ~ollows: Section A, Plat Book 30~ Pages 15 and 16, November 28, 1977. This day the County Environmental Engineer~ in accordance with directions from thi~ Reardf made report in writing upon his examination of Rollinqway Road, Brookridge Road, Ridgerun Road, 0ek£Qrest Drive, Oak£o~est Court and T~mberun Road in Great Oaks Sections 1 and 2, Clover Bill District. Upo~ Consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. ~ook~an, ~econdcd by ~r. O'Neill, it is resolved that Rollingway Road, BrOOkridge Road, Ridgerun Road, 0sheerest Drive, 0agforest Court and Timberun Road in Great Oaks~ Sections 1 and 2, Clover Hill District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be i~ further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Highways and TranspOrtation, he and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary system~ Rollingway Road, beginning ah i%~ interse~%io~ with ~enito Road, ~tate gouts 604, extendin~ soutwe~ .27 ~il~ to the inter~ection of Brookridge Road, then sou~h .20 mile ~o ~he intersection of Rid~r~ Road and existing Rollin~ay Roa~, Sha~e Route 2790; Brookrid~e Road, beginning at i~s interseetio~ w&~h Roiiin~way Road, extendi~ northwest .08 mile to the intersection of Oakforesh Drive; Ridgerun Road, beginning a~ its intersection with Rollin~ay Road, extending northwest .03 mile to a dead end; 0akforest Drive~ beginning a% hO the intersection of Oakforest Court, then sou:h .08 mile ~O =he insurrection o~ Ti~erun Road, %hen south .08 mile to the intersection of Ridgerun Road, then south .04 mile to a dead end 0akfores~ Court, beginnin~ a: i=s intersection with Oakforest Drive, extending we~% .07 mile to a eu~-de-sao; Ti~erun Road, beginning at its intersection with Oakforest Drive, ~x~e~inq northwest .03 mil~ ~o a dead end. The~e roads serve 85 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors ~uarantees to the Virginia D~partmsnt O~ ~ighways a 50 ~=. right-of-way for all of these roads except Rollin~ay Road whiuh has a 60 ft. right-of-way and Oakforest Court which has a 40 ft. right-of-way, These sections of Great Oakg a~e recorded as follows~ Sec~ion 1, Plat Book 36, Page 90, August 28, 1979. Section 2, ~lat Book 34, ~ege~ 43 and 44, Septe~sr 3, 1980. This day the County Environmental ~ngineer, in accordance with directions ~rom =hls Board, made report in writing upon his examination of ~arbleridge Read, Queensway Road, Queensway Court and Paddenswick Court in Briarcliff~ Sections 2 and ~, Clever Hill District, Upon consideration whereo~, and on motion of Hr. Bookman, seconded by Hr. O'Neill, it is resolved that Marbleridge Road, Queensway Aced, Quaensway Court and Paddenswiek COurt in Briarcliff, Sections 2 and 3, Clover Hill District, be and they hereby are established as public road~. 81-354 And be it fu~the~ reso~ved, that the Virginia Department of ~ighways and Transportation, be and it hare~y is requested to take into th~ Secondary System, Marblmridge Road, beginning where State maintenance ends on existing Marbleridge Read, State Route /S25, ~tending s0uthwes~ .09 mile to the intersection of Queensway Road, then southwest .09 mils to the intersection of Clearlake Road, Heatheridga, Section 2, then southwes~ .03 mile to a temp0rery turnaround~ Queensway Roa~, beginning at its intsrsecti0n with Marbleridge Road, extending northwest .06 mile fo the intersection of Queanaway court, then northwest .06 mile to the in=erssction of Paddenswick Court, then northwest .12 mile to a temporary turnaround; Queensway Court, beginning a% its intersection with Que~nsway Road, extending ~outhwast .06 mile to a cul-de-sac; ~addenswick Court, beginning at its intersection with Queen,way ROad, e~tending southwest .04 mile to a cul-de-sac. These roads serve 52 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Highways a 50 £t. right-of-way for all of these roads except Marbleridge Road wkich kas a 70 £t. right-of-way. These sectiona of Driarollff are recorded as follows: Section 2, Plat Book 34, Page 51, $~ptember 7, 1979. Section 3, Plat ~ook 35, Page 44, January 16, 1980. This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions £rom thi~ Board, made regort in writing upon his examination of Clearlake ROad in a portion of ~eatheridge, Section I and Rea:heridge, section 2, Clover ~ill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of ~. Bookman, seconded by Mr. O'Neill, it is resolved that Clearlake Road in a portion of ~eatheridge~ Section 1 and ~eatheridge, Section 2, Clover Hill District, be and it hereby is established as a public road. AXld be it further resolved, that aha Virginia Department of ~ighways and Transportation, he and it hereby is requested to take into th~ Secondary System, Clearlake Road, beginning where F%a~e Maintenance ends on existing Clea~lake Road, State Route 1421, extending northerly .35 mile to the intersection of ~arbleridge Road. This ~o&d serv,$ ~ lot~. And be it further res©ired, that the Board of Supervisorm %uaran~ees to the virginia Department of ~igkway~ u 50 ft. ~i~ht-ef-way for this road. These ~ections of ~ahheridge are ~eoorded as follows: ~ectlon 1~ Pla= Book 34, Pg~s 41 ~nd 42, October 23, 1979. ~ection 2, Pla= Baok ~, Page 93, June 19, 1981. ~te: unanimous ~his day the County ~nvir0nmen~al Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made repor~ in wri~in~ upon his examination of Groundhog Drive in Edg~hill Townkouse~, Section D, Midlothian District. Upon consideration whereo~, and on motion of Mr. ~ookman, seconded ~y Mr. O'Neill~ it i~ r=solved that Groundhog Dr~ve in Edg~hiI1 Townhouses, Section D, Midlothian District~ be and it hereby is established es a public road. And be it further received, that the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, GroundhOg Drive, b~ginning where State Maintenance ends, State Reut~ 1708, and going .09 mile westerly ~o a dead end. This road serves 18 lots. 82-355 15. C_ 14. A. 14 .B. © 14, C~ And be it further resolved, that the Board cf guarantees to tho Virginia Department ~f ~ighways a 50 ft. riqht-of-way for thi~ road. This section of Bdgahill Townhousss iS recorded as Section D, Plat Book 37, Page 93, Decen~er 12, 19~0. Vote: Unanimous On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Hr. O'Neill, the Board authorized tho ~rea~ur~r to chang~ the Petty Cask Custodian for the Midlothian ~ranch Library from Pa;rices A. Howe to Mary Ruth Ralapatz, with the fu~d amount remaining the ~ams. Vote: Unanimous On me,ion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Hr. O'Neill, the Board authorized the Treasursr to establish a Change Fund in the amount of $25.00 in the name ~f J~rey B. ZUZly for the Dapartmen~ of Community Development. Vote; Unanimous On motion of Mrs. Gi~on~ seconded by ~r. Bookman, the Board adopted tho ~ollow~n9 resolution: Whereas, the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation has requested ou~ concurrence of rentt~bering a abort section of existing Buford Koad lRouts 678) of~ of Route 6[ intersection and tho newly constructed portion of roadway that was built on the north ~ide of Route 60 in:erchange across from Providence Roa~ that ties into Old Buford Road 0.25 milo northwest ~f Route 60 interchanq~ duo to the new, completed project On Ro~te 60, NOW~ Therefore, Be It Resolved that the Chesto:~£ald Conn~y Board of Supervisors does hereby a9re~ with the renumberinq of Old Buford Road section bi changed from Route 678 to Route 1300 as indicate~ on the attached asp sketch. We al~c concur wi~h Ch, newly constructed roadway section ~ein~ ranua~ered to Route 678 as indicated on %he attached map sheet. Vote: Unanimous Mrs. Girone requested that the Eiqhway Department install a sign as one would leave Ben Air headed towards Route 6~ indicating a right-tarn lane Onto Providence from BufOr~ Read. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconds4 by ~r. Book, an, th~ Board approved the following street name changes as requested by property owners in ~ach area: . 1. Allied Chemi0al Road to Allied Road; and 2. Wes; Petty Road to Old Brick Schocl Road. Ve~el Unanimous O~ motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by 1. the Board: Denied the request for a itraet light on Me~eor COur~ B~rmuda District; Approved t~e request ~or a street light at thm intersection of Blith~ add Easy etreo~ with any associated costs to be expended from the Bermuda District Streo~ Light Funds; Denied th~ request for a street light at the intersection of Esquire Road and ~uilford Road, Midlothian District, becaus~ 81-356 14.D. 14. E. 15.A.1. it does not meet criteria ~or traffi~ and Because this is a would have to be 4, Approved the installation of a street light on Cascad~ Street with any associated cozes to be expended £rom Dale Qistrict Street Light Funds; and 5. Denied the request for a street light on 0akcliff Avenue but approved the installation 0£ a street light at the intersection if agreeable with th~ requester with any associated costa to he expended from the Clover Hill District Street Light FUnds. Vote: Qnan~mou$ On motion of ~r. Dodd, sas0gded by Mr. O~Neill, th~ Board appropriated $140,000 from the $152,237.60 ~vailable from the uncommitted drainage funds to be used for the construction of the Wood Dal~ Road Drainage Project. Vote: Unanimous ~r. O'Neill inquired when the ~iver Road project would be ready ~or approval. Mr. McElfigh stated that this project was still in the ~nginee~ing stages and that it w~uld be ready for 1982-83. Mr. @'N~ill indicated his dissatisfaction with this timetable. Mr. Bookman inquired about the Kelly's Pond project in Clover Hill. Mr. MoElfish stated it wam not ready at thi~ Mr. McEtfieh stated that projact~ are coming to the Beard, as =he engineering is oompleBud an~ some of the projects can be accomplished with County ~erces. Mr, H~drick s~ated that staff would be bringing a comprehensive plan to the Board in the future. On motion of ~rs. Gir0ne, seconded by ~r. Bookman, the Board a¢oepted an agreement between the County and the ~evelopers of Johnston-Willis Hospital and authorized the County Administrator to sign a save-harmless agreement with the Highway Department certain drainage easements that may be necessary to b~ acquired for Johnston Willis Drive, subject to au agreement between the County and fha ~o~pital ~tating that the Hospital is for any maintenance invclve~ with the channel and that prior to development of the property surrounding the existing outfalI, n~ensary Off site easements will be obtained and the subject drainage ditch from Johnston Willis Drive down to th~ property line will bs improved as per the approved plans and paved if Vote: Unanimous On motion of Mr. O'Neill, second~ by ~rs. Girone, ~he Board approve~ an~ authorized the Coonty Administrator to ex,cute any necessary doou~ent~ for the following ~ater contract= WS1-75CD/6(8)lV~2, ~appy Hill Farms [On-~ite and Off-site) Developer: Carl Bogase Associate$~ Inc. Developers Contract: $ 53,800.7§ Developar~ contribution for on-$~te, ~ inch water line, installed under W79-272 $ 6,061,80 Developers advance for off-site water line inetelled under N79-27B, re'funds through ~onnection$ $ Total Developer Contribution $ 26,061.00 Code: 366-1-11684-7221 Irefund through connectionm for off-site mains) 15 .B. %~.C.2. On motion of Mr. Bookman, seCOnded by ~rs. Girone, the Hoard approved and authorized the COunty Ad~£nistrate~ to execute any necessary dooth~ents for W81-66C/6(8)1661, Kellersl~y subdivision =o William M. Harman in the amount of $16,764.40 and further the Board appropriated $18,440_84 from 563 $~rplus to 380-1-61661-4393 (including 10% continqency). Vote: Unanimous on motion of l'dr. O'Neill, seconded by ~r. Bookman, the Board approved and authorized th~ County ~ministra~or to execute any n~cessary doouments for W79-27B/6(7}9277, Happy Hill Road, to Van Doren Brothers in tko amount of $63,872.50. Vote: Ueanlmous On motion of Mr. Dedd, seconded by ~lr. 0'N=ill, the ~oard approved the following adjustment of apprcpriation~ for writ= and 1. W81-30C -- ~OU~e 10, Pressure Regulator - Appropriated $211.08 from 583 to 380-1-61301-4393. This addi~ienai amount is needed to cover materials provided by the County for the co~tract. W7~-27B - R~ppy ~ill goad Wa~er Line - Appropriated $500.00 from 559-1-00640-0000 (advance by 4eVelQpers) to 380~1-69277-4393. Under developer contract number Wel-GgD, ~r. James H. Barrett, Jr. deposited wi~k tko County $500.00 to ~xtend the water line to his property on Happy Hill Road. 3. S80-43C - Route 1 at Hebrewdate Road - Appropriated from 574 Surplus $7,000 fo= engineering to 3~0-1-70431-2142. The Board approved the design be accomplished by Austin Srockenbrough and Associates on A~ril 9, 1980. 4. $80-53C - Fores~ Acres - Appropriated $1,623.92 from 574-1-00640-0000 (advances by developers) to 380~1-70531-4393. Mr. Jame~ and Barbara ~odg~s deposited wiLk tko County $1,623.~2 to extend the sewer line to their property. Vote: Unanimous Sn motion o~ M~. Dodd, seconded by Mr. O'Neill, the Roard approved and authorized tko County Administrator t~ e~ecute any necessary documents for th~ following ~ewer ¢on~ract: Wel-18CD/7(8}1182, Br~n~erm/ll Business Park North Dev~lcper~ Brand~rmill Centrastor~ R.M.C. Contractors, Inc. Total Contract Cost: $ 84,~4.50 ~ssimated County Cost~ 2,492.90 (Refund through connections for oversize lines) Estimated Developer Cest~ $82,372.50 Code: 57&-1-11781-7221 UnanimOuS Dn mution of Mr. Dodd, ~econded by Mr, 0'~ill, the Board ~pproved and a~thorized the County Admlnisfrator to execute any a~cessary documents for Contrac~ No. $81-10CD/7(8)1102, ~illowhurst, for the extension of the ~ingsland Creek trunk sewer and further %he ~oar~ t~anmferred $10,000 from 3S0-1-72000-7212 to 380-1-71102-7212 and appropriated $18,~02.70 from 574 Surplus to 380-1-71102-7212. Vote: Unanimous 15.C.3. 25.E.2. 15.F.I~ On motion of Mr. Dodd~ seconded by HZ. O~Neill, the Board authorized ~hs payment to Envirorn~ental Englne~ring ~o make drainage improvements at 4~01 Vauxkall Read in an amount not exceed $1,500 provided a mtatement is signed by Mr. and Mrs. Faulkner, the property owners, that this will satisfy their concerns. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Painter presented the Board with a report of developer water and sewer contracts executed by the County AdminisLrator. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Gircne, the BOard approved and authorized the Chairman and County Administrator to execute quit claim deeds vacating the Chester Sewage Lagoon easements subject to dedication o£ Lhe necessary easements and that the grantees agree to be responsible fo~ any Bealth Department requirements involving the abandonment of this lagoon. Vote: Unanimous On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board approved and authorized the Chairman and County Administra~0r to ex~cuts a deed conv~ying a portion of the Ashto~ Creek Sewage Lagoon property for $6,000, with necessary ease~ea=s being reLained~ ~nd subject :o the grantees e~roaing ~o be for any Eealth Department requirsments i~vo1ving the abandor~ent of this lagoon. Vote: unanimous Mr. Hedrisk ~tated this rims and date ha~ been advertised for a public hea~ing to consider an Ordinance to vacate a easement across Lots 24~ 25 and 26, in Block ~, S~oketree, ~ection B. There wac no one presunt to discuss ~his lotion Df M~=. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the following ~rdinanoe was adopted: An Ordinance to vacate a portion of e 30 ft. easement across ~4, 25 and 26, ~lock E, Smoketree~ S~ction B, Clover 5ilt Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown on plat thereof duly recorded in the Clerk~ Office of the Circuit Court of Chssterfield County in Plat Book 31 at Whereas, Midlothian Development CorpQration has petitioned khe Board cf Supervisors o~ Chesterfield Ceunty, Virginia, to zaoate a portion of a 30 ft. easeme~ aaross Lotm 24, 25 and 26, ~lock E, Smoketre~, Section B~ CIo~ar Hill Magisterial District~ 2hesterfi~ld, Virginia, more partic%larly ~hc~m on a plat of ;ecord in the Clerk's Office of the C~rcui~ Court of said County ~n Plat Book 31, at Page 8~, ~ada by J. K. Ti~ons and ~e~ooiatas, Incorporated, dated July ~5, 1978. The portion Of ;he easemenz ~e~itioned tc be vacated is mor~ fully described as ~ellcws: A portion of e 30 ft. easement across Lots 24, 25 and 26, Clock E~ Smokatre~, Section B, shaded in green on a plat ma~ by J. K. Ti~ons and Associates, Engineers, Surveyors and Planners, dated April 23, 1981, a co~y of which is attacAcd hereto and made a part of this Ordinance, Whereas, notice has been given pursuant to Section 1~.t-431 ~f the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertising~ and Whereas, no public necessity exists for the continuance of the portion of easement sought tO be vacated and the ~acation ~iI1 not abridge the rights of any citizen. Now, Thersfors, Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors 9f Chesterfield County, Virginia: ~1-359 15 That pursuant to Section 15.1-482 lb) of bhe Coda of aasamsn~ is hereby vacated an~ no ~onq~r necessary f~r public This ordinance shall ba in full force and effect in accerdance with Section 15.1-482 (b) of the Code o~ Vixginia, 1~50, as amended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance, together wi~h the plat attached h~re~o shall be raoorded no sooner than thirty day~ hersafter in the C1srk'z Office of the Circuit Court of Cheskerfiald, Virginia, pursuant to Section 15.1-485 o£ the Co~e of Mirginia, 1950, as amended. The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483 is to destroy the fQrCe and effect cf the recording of the portion of the plat vacated. Aceardinqly, this Ordinanc~ shal~ be indexed in the names of the County of Cheste~isld, a~ grantor, and Midlothian Develo~men~ Corperation, ~r their successors in title, as vote: Unanimous ~r. 5¢drick staa~d this dat~ and time had b~an advertised for 5uhlic hearing to consider an Ordinanc~ v~catin~ ~lat within Green Pine~ Subdivision. Th~ra ]iscu~ this matter. On motion of ~s. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, ~ha follewin~ Ordinance wsa adopted: An Ordinance to vacate a p~rtion o~ a pla~ within Green Pines Subdivision, clover Hill Magisterial Distri¢~ (formerly ~anches~er District), Chesterfield County, virginia, a~ shown on plat thereof duly reoQrdad in the Clerk's Office of the Circui~ Uourt of Chesterfield County in Plat Bock 9 at ~age Wheraas~ Restauranteur, Inc. (formerly ~oliday Central Commissary, Inc.) and Richard J. Ripp have petitioned the Board of Supervisors of ChesterField CQunhy, Virginia, to vacate a portion of a plat within Green Pines Subdivision, Clover ~a~i&terial District (£Qrmerly ~anchester District) CheSterfield, Virginia, more particularly ~hOwn on a plat of r~cQrd in the Clark's Offilcs of %h~ Circuit Court of said County in Plat 9, st Page 103~ made by Charles E. Plee~ and Associates, dated January 27, 1956. The portion of the ~ubdivi~iQn plat petitioned ho be vacate~ is ~ore fully described a~ follows: A portion of ereen ~ines ~ore ~ully described as follows: Lot~ I, 2, 3 and 4~ ~lock A, including the 8 ft. and 16 ft. ~aee~ents as shown outlined in red on a plat made by Charles H. Fleet and Associates, dated January 27, t956¢ a copy Of which is attached hereto and mede a part of this Ordinance. whereas, notice has been given pursuant to Seebioa 15.1-431 sf the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended~ by advertisings and ~herea~, no public necessity exists for the continuance O~ ~ke portion cf ~ubdivision ~eught to be vacated and the vacation will no% abridge the rlghb~ of any citizen. Now, Therefore, Be %t Ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Chester~£¢l~ County, Virginia: That pursuant ~o S~ction 15.1-482 Virginia, 1950, as amended, t~e above described portions of Green Pine~ Subdivision ara hereby vacated and are no longer necessary for public This 0rdinanca shall be in full force and effect in accordance with Section 15.1-482 (b) of the code of virginia, 19SO, as amended, and a certified copy of this Ordlnanca, 81-360 =egether with =he plat attached hereto shall bo recorded no sooner than thirty days herea£ter in the Clark's Offiss of the Circuit Court cf Chesterfield~ Virginie~ pursuant to Section 15.1-485 of the Coda of Virginia, 1950, as amended. The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483 is ~o destroy the force and effect of th~ recording of th~ portion of the plat vacated. Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the names tko County cf chesterfield, as grantor, and Richard J. Ripp and Restauranteur, Inc. (formerly Keliday Central Commissary, vote: Unanimous Mr. Hedriok stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an Ordinance vase=ins a portion o~ ~O ~t. easement across Lot 3~ Block A, Chester Station, Section of ~s. ~i~one, seconded by ~r. Dodd, the following Ordlnane~ was adopted: An Ordinance to vacate a portion of a 16 ~t. easement across Lot 3, Dlook A, Chester Station, Section A, Magisterial ~is%riot, C~os=erfield County, Virginia~ as shown on a plat thereof duly recorded in th~ Clerk'~ of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in Plat Book 33 at Page 31. Whereas, Thomas S. Wim~ton~ III~ has petitioned the Board Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, to vacate a portion of a t6 ft. easement across Let 3, Block A, Chester Section A, Bermuda ~agisteriaI DistriCt, chesterfield, virginia, more particularly shown on a plat of record in the Clerk's of the Circuit Court of said Counay in Plat Book 33, at Page ~%ade by J. K. Tii~mons and Associates, dated July 28, 1978. The portion of easement petitioned to be vacated i~ more fully d~scribsd as A portion o~ a 16 ft. ea~e~ent across Lot 3, Block A, Chester Station~ Sectic~ A, as shown shaded in green on a plat mad~ by J. K. Ti~ons and Associates, ~ngineers, Surveyors and Planners, dated May 21, 1981, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a pa~t of this Ordinance. Wherea~, notice has been given pursuant to Bectien 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertiuing; and whereas, ne public necessity exiut~' for the continuance of the portion of easement sought to be vacated and the vaoatio~ will not abridge the rights of any citizen. Now~ Therefore, Be It Ordained by the Board of SUperViSOr~ of chesterfield Coun=y, Virginia: That pursuant to Section 15.1-452 (b) s~ the Code ef Virginia, 1950 as am~nd~d~ the abov~ described p~rtlon of easement is hereby vacated and no longer necessary for public This ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accordance with Suction 15.1-4%2 (b! cf the Ccd~ of Virginia, 1950, as amended, end a certified eo~y of =his Ordinance, together with the plat attached hereto shall b~ r~corded no sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of the Circui~ Cour~ of Chesterfield, Virginia, pursuant to Section 15.1-485 of the Code of Virqinia, 1950, as amended. The uffuct cf this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483 is to destroy ~he force and effect of ~h¢ r~cording cf the portion of the plat Acoordinqly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in ~¼e name~ of the County of Chesterfield, as grantor~ and Mark H. ~earcs and Cynthia K. Pearce, husband and wife, or Lheir successors in title, as grantees. Vote: Unanimous ~r. Hedrick ~tated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance vacating Torrington Drive. There was no one pra~ent to discuss ~his matter. On ~oti~n Of ~rs, Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd~ the following Drdinance was adopted: An Ordinance to vacate Torrington Drive in Salisbury, Section C, Midlothian Magisterial District~ Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown on plat thereof duly r~cord~d in the Clerk~s Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in Plat Boo~ 14 at Page 92. Whereas, the Salisbury Corporation kaz petitioned th~ Board 5f S~pervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, to vacate Porrington Drive in Salisbury, Section C, Midlothian Magisterial )istriot, Chesterfield, Virginia, more particularly sho~n On a ~lat of record in the Clerk's Office of th~ Circuit Court cf said ~Qunty in Pie= sock 14, at Page 92, made by J. K. Timmons, Civil ~ngineer, dated September 27, 196~. The right-of-way petitioned ~o be vacated is more fully d~soribed a9 follows: Torrington Drive in Salisb~ry~ Section C, beginning on south line of Kings~ill Read and running in a southerly direction~ the location of which is more fully shown outlined in red on a plat made by J. K. Timmons and Associates, Engineers, Surveyors and Planners, dated June 18, 198t, a uopy of wh~ch is attached h~reto and made a part of this Ordinance. Whereas, notice hen teen given Dursuunt to Section 15.1-431 :f the Coda of Virginia~ 1950, as amended, by a~vertising; Whereas, no public necessity exists for the continuance of :he portion of right-of~way sought to be vacated and the vacatio~ will not abridge the right~ of any citizen. Now, Therefore, ~e It 0rdaine~ by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia: That pursuant to Section 15.1-~$~ {b) of the Code Of Virginia, I950, au amende~, the above described Torringte~ Drive is hereby vacated and no longer necmssary for public ube. The graa~ees hereby convey unto the County and the County hereby reserves a 25 ft. water easemen~ being the eastern half of Torrington as shown shaded in green on the attached plat. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effac~ in accordance with Section 15.1-482 (b) of the Code of Virginia, 1~0, as a~ended, and a certified copy 0~ this Ordinance, together wi~h the plat attache~ hereto shall be recorded no sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of the 2ircuit Court o~ chesterfield, Virginia, pursuant tc Section 15.1-485 of the Code of Virqinia, 19~0, as amended. The effect of ~Ais Qrdinanc~ pursuant to Section 15.1~48~ is ~ destroy the force and effect of th~ recording o£ the ~ortion uf the plat vacated. Accordingly, :his Ordinance shall be indexed in 5he names cf the County of Chesterfield, as grantor, a~d James L. Gore and ~crma ~. Gore, husband and wife, and Jame~ A. W. Smith and Martha ~. Smith, husband and wife, or their successors in title~ as 81-362 Unanimous motion of ~rs. Girmne, seconded by Mr. Bookman, tho Board ~pprnvmd and authorized the County Administrator to accept, on ~ekalf of the County, a deed of ded£cati~n from Midlothian ~empany, A Virginia General Parternahip~ a 90 ft. ~rip of land located along Lucks Lane. 7o~e: Unanimous hr. Medrick presented the Board with a report regarding the ~ooperative usa of ~chcol facilities by Parks and ~. Hedge stated that there ia a chanqe in tha~ the School System ~ould like to ~e[ a facility cka~ge tha~ will cover the direct :est incurred by tho~e u~ing the facilities. Mrs. ~£rone :hat she is concerned and does not want tho school9 to make the ~se of the facilit±~ a moneymaking activity. ~r. HedTick presented the Board with a ~eport from ~he )~partmon~. )n mot~on of ~. Dodd, secondmd by M~s. Giron~, the Board ~djourn~d at 5~15 p.m. until 9:00 On August 26, ~981. County Adm±ni$~ra%o~ ~arry ~ Daniel Chairm~n