Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
09-23-81 Minutes
(7, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES September 23, 1981 Staff in Atte~d~mce: County Administrator ~. William Howell, ~. ~ P~er, D~ctor ~'. ~ P~y. Di~ct~ ~r, DsnieI salted the meeting ZO order at the Courthouse mt 9:10 a.m. (EDST). dr. BoOkman gave the i~vocation. ~r_ Dodd joined the meeting. dr. Dmuiel asked that before proceeding with the agenda for this meefing that h~ be allowed to make ~he following remarks: 'Nr. AdministratOr, before we go into the agenda, I would like ~e express my sincere thanks for the expressions of sympathy ~iven+to me on the loss of mF father, Loveli~t ~ay Daniel. ~$Dee~ally I wish to thank the members of the Boa~d of ~upervi$or$, Jo~n, Buck, G~rl~ud, and ~erlin; the members Df ~he County Adminis~rator~ staff~ Riok~ Elmer, Ken, Vickie, ~nd Beth; the members of the Police ~d %ire Dep~rtmente: and other members of the County staff too numerous to mention, along with the citizens ia Chester£ield. I thank you for the flow*r~ card~, telephone c~lls~ and the dOnation~ tO the N~nchester ges~ue Squad. My father did not have the opportunity o~ knowing you I do~ but I kno~ that my life has been enriched by %h~ that I hzve known each ~nd every o~e of you, and I zh~k you ag~ii On motion of Mrs, Girons, seconded by Mr, Bookman, the minutes of September 9, 1981, were approved as amended. Ayes: gr. Daniel, Mr. Dodd, Er. Bookman and ~rs. Giroae AbSent: ~r. O'Neill Mr. ~edrick noted that the Northern dr~ L~udffll hzg opened~ ~d that separate collection Deists ~or aluminlt~ ~nd glass will be established on a trial basis. Mr+ gedrick commented on the recent opening of ~ new Division of ~otor Vehicles Office, located at %be intersection of Rt. 60 and Courthouse Ro~d. Ers. Girone noted that this wa~ ~hs first office in %he County, ~nd believed tha~ there w~s ~ definite deman for this additional effic~ ~nd hoped that it would remnxn eden even when the planned offio~ is buin~ ~cross from the Courthouse. 81-418 Ir. O'Neill 3oined the meeting, )n eeneral motion of the Board: the followln~ resolution ~eS edopt~d a~d p~eee~t~d to ~r. Wilii~nl E. ~fnCfield upon ~is reffrement from the Office Of the Co~is~ion~r of the Where~s~ William ~. wingfiold will retire on September S0, ~here~s, ~r. Win~field h~s been ~ faithful and diligent ~mDlo~ee of the COunty since N~F t, 198$; and Whereas, Chesterfield County ~nd the Board of Supervisors ~ilI sorely miSS ~r. ~inEffsld's service and ability. Now~ Therefore, Be It Resolved that this Board publicly eeco~nizes this £alth~ul and diligent service Of Mr. Wingfield ~ield Couity their ~pprecin~ion to ~r. Win~f±eld fe~ his ma~y ears of $orvi~e to the County. AAd Be It Further Resolved ~h~ a coDY el this Resolution ,e presented to ~r. Wingfield z~d that thi~ Eeeclution be ~ern]~nenfly recorded ~:on~ ~h~ p~pers o~ ~his Board of Supervisors in presentation of this Resolution to Nr. Wingfield. He further ttatad ~hat Er. Win~field hms, like ~ father, given him ~idance ~nd the benefit of his expertise during their as$ocietioa; ~d [ur~her wished him ~d him wife N~cy m happy retirement~ with ~doptinE thx resolution, ~d ~1~o expressad his appreciation ~r, Hedrtck stated that this date and time had been advertised ~or a Public Hearths to consider an 0rdin~nce to Amend the ~ode of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as Amended, by ~mending Sections 18-11, ~1-9, 21-77 relatinE to Subdivision :ecs, Zonin~ Fees ~nd Site Plan Fees. ~r. Muzzy was present ~d addressed each portion of this )reposed amendment. He stated tha~ it was after aonsiderable 'e~arch and ~hcu~h~ that these ~ees ~d chases had been ~scemmended. He no,ed ~hat ~he amended f~s rofleo~ ~erk load of staff~ ~d that no review h~$ been endorsed since ~$ in basic a$reement with the proposed change, but that there ~as m philomophiczl/pmychologic~l difficulty with the timing )f adoption of ~his ~ea~eat. in costs ~ compared to the old structure~ Mr_ Balderson set ~p a slide p~esentation acting the difference in ~osts for the Board's review. ~r projected as revenue in compilation of the budeet~ )~t two year~, ~d that the basic fc~ula as proposed would be purpose of the fee atructure is to do the business at hand. She stated that she was concerned with ~he CO8~ O~ the enZire of re.unity development. She further noted lh~t building )~rmits have been of~ 70%, and questioned ~he need for mny mddi~i( ~ersonnel in that dep~rtm~*, $1-419 t Mr. Hmdriek slated that these positions had been approved b~ the Board, but had been frozen until such time as there was a need for them to be filled. He further sta~ed that the work load was being closel7 Monitored, not only in that office, but the entire department of Community Dev6IoDment, which encompassed ~nvironmental Engineering, etc. ~r. O'Neill noted that Chesterfield's Buildin$ Inspector's Office/Community Development dealt with a greater percentage Of work load, as compared to other loca~t~e~ with 1/3 less personnel, and in othe~ words have already been doing with less people than other government localities. G~neral dissuasion was held involving m~tters of advertising, ~oninf applications, increase in cost for ~kese items to the wn~ being imple~ented, which closely monitored 511 new personnel reGuisitions~ and the filling of vasanGies, Giron~ stated that she ~nderstood that ~ ~ew ~iviI engineer was just hired, ~nd was that ~ position tha~ had to be were only three civil engineers to review all ~ctions, ~nd that this positio~ was a aeoessi~y, even though it was aufhorized before implementation of the new personnel )roced~re policy~ aommitte~ of the Home Builders Association, and that they had seemed e~tirely ooRvinoed of the need for increases in and ~hey had asked for implementation after J~nuary, 2982. This committee has asked for a two week delay ia order that they could report to their Association and explain the necemsity of the increase. Mr. Daniel asked if anyone ~s present to address this issue. Mr. John Smith, Midlothi~n Distri6t, asked to address the Board. ~e stated that he had not determined whether the work load in the Planning Dep~rtment is superfulous, ~nd commented on the inadeGuate nofifisation of zoning applica~ions~ ere, He spoke to th~ method Of ~dv~rtising, and felt that ther~ was scm9 duplication of effort involved, and felt that there should be more equitable method of resolving this situation. addressed the dr~in~e problem in ~idlethian. Mr. Bookman stated that there had just recently b~en an lacrosse in cost of County ~arbaue pickup, based on budget revenues tha~ had beep projected, and that %his ordinance change in fees w~s a~sin being implemented to recover appropriations wit the budget. He advocated a two week delay of the proposal due to the fact that those most closely involved were not to address this issue. A~tsr further d~ssussion~ on motion of ~r. Dsdd, seconded by ~r. O'Neill, the Board voted to defer October 14, 1981, at 3;00 p.m. Vote: Unanimous ~r. Daniel ~t~ted that as this matter ha~ b~en diss~sssd ~d new m~terial: t~ %hey wo~ld ~ot be required to ~ake another presentation on October 14~h. He further stated that any citizen could, of course, address the Board at this Public Hearth 81-420 Mr_ Kedriek ~t~t~d that fhi~ date and time hzd b~n advertised ~or a Public gearing to consider an Ordinance to ~e~d Chapter 4 by Adding Article V relating to Illegal Gambling Activities ~d P~nxl~ies Therefore. There was no one present to ~ddress this issue. ~r. 5edrick stated that ~r. Chmrles Watson, Commonwealth's Attorn~ had requested that the Bo~rd conEider adoption of the ordinance. This ordinance is e~sentially equiv~lsn~ Lo the ~xisting State e~t~em prohibiting gs~nbling; however, if someone is charged under a County ordinance, any monies confiscated would go to the County Treasury ratke~ than the State Treasury_ ~dopted the following Ordinance: AN O~I~C~ TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978 AS A~FDED, BY ~DDIN~ ~TIC~ V RELATING TO ILLEQ~ 6~BLING ACTIVITIES ~D DEEALTIEE THE~0RE BE I? 0EDAI~ED ~¥ the Bo~rd of Supervisors of Chesterfield (1) That Chapter 4 of the Code of the County of Chester~iel~ 19T8~ as emended, is amended by adding the following article: CHAPTER 4 ARTICLE V. G~3~BLING 4-37. Definitions. Sec. (~) "Illegal gambling". The making, placing er reeeipt~ of ~ny bet or wager in th~m County el money or other uhing of value~ m~de ia exchange for $ chance to win a prize, stake or oth~r sonsideration or thing of value~ depending upon the result of a~y] g~mc~ contest or any other event the outcome of which is uncertad or ~ matter of chance, whether such S~0~ oont~s~ or event, occurs or is re occur inside or ou~side the l~i~s of the County, shall constitute illegal s~bling. (2) "G~bling device". A g~bling device includes: (a) Any device, machine, parapherualxa, equxpment, or other thing, including books~ reCOrdS and ether papers, which ~rc ac~uall7 use~ in ~ illegal g~bling operation or acZivi~y, ~d (b) ~y machine, app~raZus~ implement~ ins~men~, coneriv~ce, bomrd or o~her ~hing, including but not limited to these depead~n~ upon ~h~ ini~rtion of z coin or other objec~ for ~heir opera, ion, which oDer~es, either complete~y automatic~lly~ or with th~ aid of some physical ~ct by the playe~ or O~er~tOr. in such a manner that depending upon elements of chance, i% may ejec~ something of value or dete~ine the prize or other thing of v~lue ~o which the player is entitled; provided~ however~ tha~ ~he return to ~he user of nothing more th~n additional ch~ce$ cz th~ right to USe Su6h machine is no~ deemed something of v~lu~ within the meaning of this subsection; and provided further that machines thzt only ~ell~ or entitle the user to: i~e~s Of ia composition, size, shape or color, shall mot be deemed g~bli~ devi~em within the moaning of this ~ubsection. $1-421 Such devises ars go less $~nbling dsvicss if thsy Lndic~te beforehand the de£inxte result of one or more operations not gll the operations, Nor are they ~ay less a gambling ;hey ~ey also s~ll or de~iver something of v~lue on a basis other 4-BS. Illecal Gambling. ~kerein shall be guilty o~ flle$~l E~mblin~. 4-$9. Illegal possession,, e~c. of sampling devios, eution under this Xrticle. In any prosecution under this ~rticle, no consideration m~ilin~ or delivery of an entry blank; his answering of ques- tions~ vsrb~lly er iB writing~ his witnessing of a demonstration Or o~her proseeding~ or any one or more thereof, ~hsre no change is m~de to, p~id by~ Or ~u¥ p~rchase required of him in connec- tion Sec. 4-41. Exceptions ~o ~i%iele; csrtsia sporting events. Nothin~ i~ this ~rticl~ Sh~ll be construed to prevent any CoBtes~ of spged or skill between men, animals~ fowl or vehicles, or dependent upon their position or score at the e~d of such Sec. 4-4~. S~ne--Dr~vm~s Nothing in this article ~hall be ~ons~rued to make it illegal to p~rticip~t~ in s g~]e of ch~nee conducted in a privsfe mubsection (3) of Sec. 4-37. SSc. 4-43. S am~--~i'ngo games and raffles conducted by o~g~nization~. Nothing in this ~rticlS shall apply %o ~.uy bin~e instnnL bingo, or raffle conducted solely by organizations h~vin~ received ~ permit ~s set forth in Ar~icl~ IV, Chapter Sea. 4-44. Forfeiture of mone¥~ gmmbling devicee~ Etc., seized from illegal. ~unbling enterprise: innocent owners or lienors. All money~ ~bliu$ devices, office equipment and other personal property used in connection with s-n illegal ~mmbling e~erprise or actfvity~ ~nd ~11 money~ stakem and thinEs Of value received or proposed to be received by a winner i~ ~y illeEal Emmblin~ transaction: which are l~wfully seized b~ a law-enforce- ment officer or which shall lawfully come ~nto his custody~ EhaI] be forfeited to ~he County by order cf the court in which a order all money so forfeited to be paid over to the eou]lty and by order sh~ll make such disposition of other property zo forfeited aS the court deems ~roper, or in the case of ~he sale thereof, the proceeds the~s£rom to be paid over to %he Count~. Provided, however, that s~Ch forfeiture shall ~o% e~%in~uish ~he rights of any ~erson without k~owaedMe of the illegal use of such property who is the lawful emmet or who has m lie~ on ~he s~e which h~s been perfoc~ed in ~he m~nner provided by l~w. A~y perso~ violating the previsions of thim artiele shall be g~il%y of a misdemeanor pumishable by a ~ine of not more than one thousand dollars or imprison~eJt i~ jgil for no more than t~elve men~hs~ either Or bo~h, Vote: Unanimous ~r. Eedrick seated that this date and time had been advertised for ~ Pdblie He,ring to oon~ider an Ordinance to Amend the Code oX t~e County of Chesterfield~ 1978 ~s amended, by amendins Section 18-18 Relatin~ tO the Procedure for the Approvsl of Subdivision Pl~ts. There w~s no one pre,eat to address this issue. the £ollowi~g Ordinance: A~ ORDIN~¥CE TO iEE~D TEE COD~ O~ THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD~ 1978 Ag A~ENDED, BT ANENDIKG SECTION 18-18 RELATING TO THE PROCEDURES FOR TNJE APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISIOK PLATS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield CountF~ (1) Thn~ ~ 18-t$ is amended and reen&cted a~ follow~: See+ 18-15+ Procedur~ I~r $~b~i__vimion A~rov~l. (a) Tentative pl~ts, The ~ubdivider sh&ll prepare ~ proposed ~eutarive plat in accordance with the provisions of division 2 o~ this article~ including ~ proposal for the insz~l~ lation of improvements a_~d intended dedication or reservation of public lands. The subdiwider shall then file a letter of trans- mittance Of the proposed tentative pl~t with the planning com- mission along with such tentative pl~t, URo~ receipt of such proposed pl~t, the planninE commission sh~ll obtain the required the planing co--lEsion sh~ll either (1) ~D~rov~ such ~entative pl~t, if such plat i~ i~ conformity with th~ provi$iOn~ Of ~hiS chapter; or (2) ~pprove %he pl~t subjec~ ~o modifications; or (3~ rejec~ the tent~ive pl~t, Written findings ~ivinE specific corrections as will pe~iT ~pproval of the plat. ~h For the resubdivision of lot~ within existing subdi¥iszons in the number Of lots and no change in the existing road layout, the director of community development is author±~ed to approve ~nd sign the plat administratively for the planni~ commissien~ ~hereafter the director of community development shall presen~ a lis~ el ~hcse pla~s ~dministratively r~vi~wed to ~he planning co~m~ission indicating action t~ken. In ifs evsn~ a plat is disapproved by the direoYor Of community development, such application shall be considered by the plannin~ commission at their next approprimt~ meeting. (b) Renewai of Tentative Plats. The planning csmmission reserves ~he Tigh~ to review tbs ~snta~ive plt~ it any time and tentative aDD,oval of the plat shall expire t~o1v~ months from the date of ~pproval. %~en there are no changes from a ~evelopment is ~ufhorized to administratively review and renew tentative plats for additional twelve month periods subject to alt p~sviously imposed conditions. In the event it is deemed ~eces~ary to require ~dditional condition~, ~eDewal requests appropriate meeting. Applications for renewal shall be prepared (e) Final plft. ~f~er eemptyfeE WiTh the term~ ~nd ~eeditioas as outlined ia (a) above, tko subdi¥ider shall prepar~ · nd submit to the d~p~tment of co~a~nity development the final ~tat inoorpor~fin~ all r~qui~c~ modifisati~ns to the tentative ~lat and fhe p~ovisions o~ division ~ of this article. Th~ ;ubdivider shall file seven reproductions thereof. Th~ director of ~ammunity developmenf shall determine ~he~her or pl~t is in conformance with the approved tentative plat and shall approve ~he final plat if such plat does so conform; or he shall send such plat %0 the plz~uning ce~mmissicn if not in ccnfo~ity · ith their reoo~ondatioa ~ ~o Iin~l action thereon. Upon receip$ thereof~ %he director of co--unity 0x~ine the final pl~t ~d ~ll necess~y certificates to determin, of co--unity develo~ent shall not approve a plat for recordation t~a~ h~ nO~ ~een approved by ~he di~ec~o~ ~eeting count requirements for public utiliti~s~ The director agreemen~ with ~he ~ub~criber. dfrector of community development, the $~divider ~y record (d) Submission and recordation of final plat. The :uhdivfder shall submit zc the sesretary one linen print and two :r~nsparencies (phOtographic positive polyester film) of the final plat. The seor~%~ry shall si~n such plats ~i~hin seven of receipt of such plats. The secretary shall return to the ~a~d~vider tbs linen print ~o be reeordsd fn th~ Cl~rk~s Offfe~ o~ the Circuit Court o£ tho County and ~hall distyibute the two transparencies to the appropriate administr~tiv~ offi¢ials~ $1-424 Unless a final plat is filed ~or re~orda~i6n within six mo~%hs lfter final approval thereof by the secretary, Such apprsval shall be withdr~v~l, and the plat skull be marked void Md returns to develop ~u~d sell lots in his subdivision. (e) Appeals. If the planning Commission or director of ~o~nunity develop~snt fails to approve or disapprove the proposed for approval, the subdivider, after ten d~ys' written notice to the co~ission, or director of eon~nunity development~ may petitio~ the Circuit Court of the County to deside whether the plat should Or should 5ct he spprOved. The Court shall hear the matter and make ~nd e~ter such order wish respect thereto ss it deems proper. If the planning o0~issioa or director of eo~nity develop- ment ~sepDr~ves ~ final plat and the subdivider eo~ecds that such disapproval was not properly b~sed on this ehzpter~ or was arbitrary or c~pricicue, ~e m~y appeal to the Circuit Court, ~ud the Court shsll hear ~/%d determlns the ease as soon as may be. On motion of Nr, Dodd, seconded by ~r. O'Neill, the Board authorized the County Administrator to enter into a settlement sgreement between the County and Pet, Icc., regardiRg workmen's compensation ~ene~its to the dependents of Nichael D. Simmons, deceased, ~ote: Unanimous This d~7 the County E~Virenmental Engineer, in ~¢¢ord~uoe wi~h directions ~om this gourd, made report in writ~$ upon his ex~u~ination of ~reh~m Place and Warehl~ Court i~ Afton: Se~tioe 4, Dale District. U~on consideration whereof, end On motion of ~r. Dodd, by Mr, O'Neill, it is resolved that Wareh~m Place and Warehum Court in Alton, Section 4, Pal. District: be and they hereby aru established as public And be it ~urther resolved, thit the Virginia Departmeu~ Of Highways ~nd Transportation, be ~d it hereb~ is requested at the intersection ~ith Sar~ Kay Drive, ~e Route ~27~0 and runninE northeasterly .09 mil~ to the intersection with warekam Court, then coatinuing nor~keas~erly .03 mile ~ ~nd in a cul-de-sac; Wareh~ Court, begianin~ a~ the intersection with Yareh~ Place ~d running southerly .04 mile to end in These roads serv~ 9 loss. And be it ~urther r~solved that ~he Board of Sugervisors usr~ee~ ~o ~he VirEinim Dep~rtment of Highways i~h~o~-way Sot Wareh~ Place ~d a 40' right-of-way for Wareh~ Court. This section of Af~on is recorded ~ follow~: Sec%ion 4, Pla% Book 37, P~e ET~ 9/30/80_ ~o=e: unan~ous 81-425 with directions from this Board, made report in wriking upon Plaee~ Tithonia Circle, ~arsom Co~t, D~lverTon Circle, in S~lem ~oods, a per%ion ef See%ions A md B and Sections C ~nd D, Dale District. seconded by ~r. O'Neill~ it is r~solved That Old Watson Drive, Eemora Drive: Rempwood Plsce, Tithoai~ Circle, ~r$on Court, DutvPrtoD Circle~ Shamrock Drive, Ch~tteris Place ~l~d C and D, D~I~ District, b~ and they hereby are established And be it ~u~ther resolved, That ~he Vir~ini~ Department of ~i~h~ys and Transportation, be sod it hereby is xe~ueet~d to take iu%o the Secondary System, 01d ~rson Drive, be~inn~n~ Dulverton Circle, Then continuin~ northeRsterl~ .13 mile to beginning st %he intersection With Ceatr~li& Road, STate Route #145 and runnin~ northerly .12 mire to the intersectioa with Ti~hoai~ Cirole, then eo~tin~ing north~stsrly .07 mile to westerly .12 mile to end at the intersection with 01d Remora Drive ~nd running e~sterly .07 mile to e~d i~ s~c. A$~in Hempwood Place beginnin~ at the intersection with ~inDins mt the intersection with Old W~rson Drive ~nd Drive, State Route 2004; Ch~te~i~ Place; beginning at ~he These reads se~e 10~ lots. ~8 b~ it ~urther remolved, that the Board of Supervisors ~rante~s to the VirEini~ D~partment of Highway~ a 50' righ~- of-wsy for ~11 of these ro~ds except Old ~rson Drive which h~s a 60' right-of-Way. Section A~ Pl~t Book ~4, P~es 58-50, Section B, Pl~t Book ~9, P~es 5 a 6, 6/Z4/77 Sec%ion C, Plm~ Eook 33, Pa~es ~T & ~8, 4/~0/T9 Section D~ PI=~ Book $4, PaEes 63 & 64, Vote: U~nimous 81-496 This day the County Environmental Engin~er, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his exa~ni~atisn s~ emoke~ree Drive, Pleasanthill Drive, Court, Smoketree Place, Spirea Road~ Gordon School Road~ Gordon School Court, ~oun~in L~urel Drive and Mountain Laurel Court in ~moke%ree, a portion of Section B and and E~ Midlothian District~ Upon consideration whereof, a~d cn motion o~ Mr_ Dodd, econded by Mr. O'Neill, i~ is resolved that Smoketree Drive, PI~zs~nthili Drive, Plemsanth~ll Court~ Smoketree Spfre~ Road, Gordon School Eo~d, Gordon School Court~ Laurel Drive and ~ountain Laurel Court in Smoketree, a portion of Section B and Sections D ~d E, Midlothi~n District, be mud Lkey hereby are established ~s public roads. And be it further resolved~ that the Vir~ini5 Highways ~t Tr~spor~ation, be ~d it hereby is requested to t~e into the Secondary System, Smokotroe Drive, beginnin~ where State mainzen~ce ends, Sta~e RouSe 2770 and ~oin~ mile westgrl~ to ~ntersectlon of Ple~s~hill Drive, ~hen ~d going .05 mile northerly to intersection of Plezsanthill Gordon School Ro~d, tRen continues .08 mile mouthwesterly to mile southwesterly to ~ie into proposed Spirea ~o~d, Smoketree, Gordon School Court, b~innin~ zt intersection with Gordon School Road ~d ~oing .04 mile nertheasEerly ~o ~ cuS-de-sac; Road ~d going .15 mite northerly to in%ersec~ion of ~ountain Laurel Court, then continues .12 mile northerly to ' northerly ~o a cul-de-sac; Nountai~ Laurel Court, beginning These roads serve 136 guar~t~es to the Vir~iaim Departmeab of Highways a 50' whereby we guaranZee a v~rimble S01 to 100' righ~-ol-way. Section B~ Plat Book Gl. P~ges S5~ 86 and 87~ Section D, P!~t ~ook 34, Pa~es 49 ~d 50, 8/31/79 Section E, Pl~t Book 37~ Page 9, 9/11/80 21-427 i1 on mo%ion of gr. Do,d, seconded by Mr. O~eill, the ~o~rd accepted an agreement between the County and ~BCO~ Inc. develoDers of Kingsl~nd Acres, SeCTiOn 4, and authorired The County Administrator to sign asRve harmless ~reement with the Highway Department for certain drainage easement~ that may be necessary to be ~cquired for Kingsland Acres, See%ion 4. Vote: Un~nimous On motion of Mr, Dodd, ssconded by Er. O'Neill, the Board awarded th~ low bid of $Z9,37~ to Associated Electrical Service for installation of ~thletic lighting on [~) basketball courts and for security light8 for the front parkin~ ~rea Funding for ~his pro~eo~ is to be ~p~ropri~tsd from Parks & Recreation ~ond Program ~unds, Vote: U~.uimeus On motion of ~r. Dodd, seconded by Nr. 0~eill, the Board auths;ized th~ County AdministratOr ZO enter into an G~otechnical E~gineexs ~n the ~mount of $3~000.00 to ensure Vehicle Nainten~nce Facility, with funding for the contract tc he expended from budgeted funds ~or the Facility. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by ~;. 0'~eill, the Board ;uthorizsd the County Attorney smd the County Adminietr~tor to forward ~or eolleotion~ · delinquent account of an ou~ of sta~e debtor, Cumberland ~irlines, Inc., To a Maryland Attorney~ with 1/3 o~ the ~moun% of the $§18,32 debt to be paid to the local Na~yland counsel as ~ collection fe~, Vote: Unanimous Mr. Fr~uk Gec~ Resident Engineer ~or the Vir~ini~ Department of Highways, Chesterffeld County was present. He stated that th~ £ollowing items had been eo~plete~ per ~ resolmtion reGues~i~ them from the lost Board ~eeting. These projects concerned the installatzon of pavement ~eflectors a% ~he following Route 10 ~nd Lcri Road; Courthouse Road knd Rt. 147 at Rt. 60; Route l&7 ~nd Robio~ Eo~d; Y~ersestion of Elkhardt m.nd Turner; OsniZo ~nd Route 3~0; ~d Robious and Route He s~ated ~h~ ~ special $30,000.00 Federal ~undlng Appropri~tio~ hod p~id for the above-listed projects. ~e further noted pro3ects for the next budget year. He gave a breakdow~ of the funding for maxnTen02ioo, secondary roads, and prim&fy roads, ~nd requested that the County prepare a list of priori%les before th~ end of October, 1981. ~r. D=~iel requested Mr. Dexter Will: to prepare such a l~st for the County ~d circul=te i% ~onE the Bo;rd members for ~ny additional g~gestions. t~affic from seeing the stop sign plaoed at tha~ intersection. hazard. He farther stated that only thio morning, he had due to the fuct that there are no ~urn lanes~ and That this also is a traffic h~zard and asked ~hat this intersection be Yr. Dodd stated that there is a prosl~m with e~st bound traffic on Route l0 making a lef~ turn on Osborne Road. It w~s stated that perhaps the reflectors ia the pavement see traffic turning onto Curtis Street, and he hoped tha~ sight problem, and furtho~ asked for any held ~nd suggestions regarding the intersections of Kingodale Rd. and ~he Pike. Er. Gee stated that signalization and ~hanneli~ation studie~ were being done at =hess looations~ and ~haT he would chsck ~r. Dodd noted that the Police Department had recommended Sh~t Mr. O'Neill stated that he believed that pavement reflectors He further noted ~hat he agreed wi~h Mr. Dodd that reflectors Harrowgate and Happy Hill Road~ and the intersection of Route 1 and Rt. ld4. Ee also noted that the reG~esYed work and thanked the Highway Department for i%s expeditious handling of thio matter. ~rs. Girone noted that repairs and fillin~ of potholes on addition to several areas on Old Hundred and Genito. She requested that l~nes he repainted before bad weathsr sets in at the Forest Rill ~ve. and Bulord Road intersection. ~rs. Giro~ further stated that c~$~e~s had indicated that the stop sign on th~ wrong side of th~ street, add aoked that it be moved. paralleling Buford Road, aS there is a surety problem a% *ha~ N¢Cr~e had been dimcumsed wiLh the Polioe Department, ~d Hr. Bookman stated tha~ ~he lines needed paintin~ at Elkk~rdt ~eSardi~ signalization at Be~on~ ~d ~rner Roads. Mr. ~e stated that at this tim~, the vOl~e Of traffic did ~o~ a six month period Of time, ~ad results would be ~orwarded to gl-429 Mr~ Beekm~u further inquired about a solution to the serious Road, off ~t. 260 West. Ne stntsd that $200~000 had been bids were to be advertised in November ~f thio year. Mr, Bookmnn noted that due to the great length Of time for initiating this project, the County was using a great deal of Police Department m~power for traffic control, 8nd ~r. O'neill excused h~self from the meeting. ~r. Dedd inquired abou~ ~he possibility of obtaining ~ccess funds ~or the Enon Church Road project, ~nd the Point were still priority project, ~ad would net~£y the of ~uy fund~ beaoming availabl~ in the future. ~r. Bookmmn excused himself from the meetzaE, Er. Hedrick ~dvised the Board of outstanding appointments, George Willies wmm appointed ms a representative to Ayes: ~r, D~niel, ~r. Dodd: Nfs, Girone, Nr, O'Neill On motion of Nfs. Girone~ seconded by Er. O'Neill, ~r. cf Directors' Executive Co~ittee of CO~OOL. Ayes: Nr. D~ie~, ~r. Dodd, ~rs, Girone, Nr. O'Neill Absent: Nr. On motion cf Nr. Dodd, meconded by ~r. O'Neill~ the following street lights were approved with funding tO be expended from the STreet Light Fund: On Elckomin Avenue, Sermuda District On Friend Avenue, Bermud~ District Ayes: ~r. Daniel, Nr. 9odd, ~rs. ©irene. Mr. O'Neill Absent: The next item on the agend~ wgs deferred until l~t~r in ~he meeting, ~nd concer~gd the Revenue Sharin~ Fundin~ Amendment ~nd Clover gill 3Q Rend F~nd~ for PrOvidenc~ Road Widening, $255,000 available from the 1981-83 Come,unity Development Block Or~nt Program, and further st&Ted that staff has reCo~end. that ~he surplus funds bs used ~o: (1) Eeplac~ ~ portion of the funds originally included in the drainage component of th~ program; (~) IncIude ~ portion of the f~nde needed to ~mprove the intersection of CheeterfieSd Ave, ~d the r~ilyo~d creosinE~ of 12 acres south of the Park; and ~4) Expand the e~p~bility of the Fire Depnrtment in Ettrick. 81-430 10, A. lO. B.] Nr. Mazzy further explained that, as required by k~JD, public hearing had been held September 21, 1981 in Ettrick, ~nd that the Ettrick Oiti~en~ Advisory Conm]ittee supports requested budget change, After further discussion, on motion of Mr. O'Nsill~ seconded by Nr. Dodd, tho Board authorized the County Administrator to submit a budget amendment to HUD for those items previously mentioned in this item. Mr. Bookmm] ret~xned to the meeting. ~r. ~Ummy discussed the previously deferred item regarding the Revenue Sharing Funding ~mendment and Clover Hill 3~ Road Funds for widening of Providence Road. He noted that staff recommends approval of this requeet~ and after discussion~ On ~ot~on e~ ~r. Book, an, seconded by Er. O~Neill, the following resolutio~ was adopted bF th~ Beard~ Whereas, the B~ard of Supe~visor~ adopted ~ resolution on July 1, 1981~ specifying $10,875 in County revenue 8h~Fing Road widening from Davis School aortR requires some expenditure from public fBnds for the widening; Now, Therefore: Be It R~$olved b~ the Chesterfield mlloeggi0a to Providence asd ~lkhar~t goads intersection be Elkhardt Road north to Route 80. Vote: Unanimous O~ motion of Er, Bookman, seconded by Mr. O'Neill, the Beard approved the following budge~ change for righ~ of way acquisition mud relocmtioa of private property by increasing Account ~B0-1-97201-4101 by $3,000 and decreasing Clover Hill 39 Road Funds by voge: Unanimous ~r. Painter presented the Board with the water ~nd Sewer financial On me, ion o1 ~r. Bookman, ~econded by ~r. Dedd, the Board ~pproved the Tollowing wst~r ~ontr~ot County Administrator to sxscut~ any necessary documents: WB1-93CD/6(8)193~ Reed'e Landing, Section A Developer; Gilliam Corporation Contractor: StYmie E. Lyttle Co., Inc. Total Contract Cost: Estimated County Cost: 29,550.87 - Refund through Connections for off-eite~ oversize ~ pressure regul~ti~ Estimated Developer Code: 3~6-1-11684-7221 No. of Comn¢ctio~s: 89 gl-431 10. B,2. 10, On motion of Nr. Bookmmn, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Bc~rd approved the following request for appropriatioe for the W79-7CD - Stat~ Highway project for the relocation of waker line On R~thers Road AppropriaTe $52,294.19 from S63 Surplus (which includes 10% contingency) to 380-1-69072-4393 Vote: Un,salmons On motion of Mr. Bookman, ~eco~ded by ~r. Dodd, the Bo~rd approved the followin$ s~w~r oon~ract and a~o~ized the ~ounty ~ckninlstrztor to execute any necessary documents. Sewer Contrzct No. $8t-49CD/7(8)149~, Indian Hills Inn Oeveloper~ Gust Enterprises of Carolin~, Ins_ Contractor: Piec~mo~t Construction Company, Iao. Total Contrast E~tim~ed Conn~y Estimated Reveloper Cost: Code: ~74~1-i1781-T221 $9,807.10 8,047.10 - Refund thru connections for off$it~ ~ewers $1:760.00 On motion of Nr~ Bookman, Seconded by Nr. Dodd, ~he Board Oonnty Ad~inieer~tor to execute ~my necesszry documents. Sewer Contract ~o. 7($)04@1, Installation of Sewer to serve Buckingham-Shop Street Area. Contractor: Van Doren Brothers: Inc. Amount: $151,142.50 and ~urther appropriated S~66,2~6.7B ($151,142,50 plUS 10% con, inSerter) from ~he ~74 Surplus to 3S0-1-?0481-4393. On motion o~ Mr. Boo~m~n, ~econd~d by Mr. Dodd, the Board ~u~horized the County Attorney to institute unknown heirs O~orge L. Banks for ~ water easement along ~appy ~±11 Road, th~ ~timated v~lue of thiz e~m~ment betas $100.00. Be it further resolved that the County Adminis~rator notify any known heirs of the Estate of ~eorge L. Banks by registered mmil of the intention of the County to enter upon and ~ake ~he property which is to be tke sabject of said coademmation proceedings. A~ emergen¢F exi~ting~ this re~olution sh~ll be ~nd if hereby is declared iu full forc~ amd effect immediately UpOn pa~a~e. Estate of George L, B~uks W~tsr E~$ement along H~py Hill Road $100.00 81-432 lO. B.?. lC. 10. On motion of ~r. Bookman, seconded by ~r. Dodd, the Board authorized the County Attorney TO P~oceed wzth condemnation proceediugs ~¢ainst the followin$ property ovmers if the ~ount aS set opposite their n~es is not aOC~pted. further resolved that the County Administrator notify said property Owners by registered mail of the intention of the County to enter upon ~nd t~e the property which is to be the subjsc~ of s~id coademn~tion proceedings. An existing, this resolution ~hall be ~nd it hereby is declared in full force and effect ~ediately upon passage. This Robert J. & ~yrtle V. Stewart SSO-4gC/~ $233.00 Horace E. & ~ary E. Conyer~, e~ al S80-48C/~ 68.00 On motion of Mr, Bockmm], seconded by Mr. Dodd~ ~he Board authorized the County Attorney to proceed with condemnation proceedings ~g~inst the E~a~e of Joh~ H. M~rks ~o obtain a Sewer E~sement to serve proper~y om Granite Springs Road. Be i~ further re~otved that the County Administrator notify the heirs of the ~st~te of John H_ ~nrks by registered mail of the intention of th~ COUaty tQ enter upo~ an~ take the property which is to he ~he ~ubjeo~ of said Condemnation proceedings. An emergency existing, this re~olutton sh~ll be and ±~ h~reby is declared in full Estate of John H, N~rk$ ee~er Easement ~o $40.00 Gr~nit~ Sprin~s Ro~d ¥o~s: Unanimous Er. Hedr±ok s~ated ~hez %his d~te a~d time was advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to vacate a portion of a 20' ease~en% anros~ Lot 1~, Block W~ Greenfield Section F. No one was presen~ to addre~m this issue. On motion of Mr. Book. an, ~econded by ~r. Dcdd, the Board adopted the followin~ A~ ODDINANCE ~o vacaZe ~ per, ion of ~0' Easement across Lot 1~, Block W,~ ~reenfield Section F, Midlothian Ma§is%erial DistriCt, Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown ca plat thereof duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of th4 Circuit Court of Chestsrfield County ia Plat Book l? at ~ag~ 22. Whereas, Regency Eo~e B~ilder8 ~as petitioned tke Board of suDervzsors of Chesterfield County, Virginia ~o vacate a portion of a 20' ~asemea% across LOt ~5, BRock W, Greenfield Seefion F, Eidlo~hian Magisterial Dis%tier, Chesterfield, Virgiu~ more particularly shows on a plat of record in ~he Clerk's Offfo¢ of the Cireui~ Court of said Couaty in Plat Book 17, at page made by J.K. Tigons & Associates, Ins. d~ted July 3, 1968. The portion of easement petitioned ~o be vacated i$ more fully desgrib~d a~ follows: A Dot, ion of ~ 20' ~Eemen~ &droSs Lot 15, Block W, plat m~de by L2n~]ark Su~yors, Ins., Engineers, Surveyors ~d Planers, d~2ed Aueust 3, 1961, a copy of which is attached h~re~O ~nd mmde 2 of this ~here~S, ~Otic~ ha~ been given pursuit to Section 15.1-43] 81-433 10_ B. %gnereas: no public ~ecessity exists for the continuance of the portion of eaesmenz sousht to be vacated and the vacation Now, Therefore, Be It Ordained By Tho Board o£ Supervisors of ChesterXield County, That pursuant to Section 15.1-452(b) of the Cods of Virginia, 19~0, as aunecded, th~ g~e~e described portion of emsement is hereby vacated and is no Iong~r necessary 2or ~uhlic use. This 0rdin~nee ~hall be in full forge a~d sffsct in nceorda~ce wi~h Section 15.1-dee(b) of the Code of Virginia, as amended, ~n~ ~ Certified copy of t~i~ Ordinance, together with the plat attached hcrelo sh~ll be recorded no sooner tkmn thirty d~y$ hereafter in the Cterk~s Offic~ of Circuit Court of Chesterfield, Virginia pursuant to Section il.I-~g5 o£ the Code of Virginia, 1~50, ms amended. The effect of this Ordinance pu=s~aaf to Section 15.1-483 is to destroy the force ~d effect of the re~ordfng Of the per, ion of the plat AeeordinEly, this Ordinance shall be ~ndexed in ~he names of ~he County of Chestsrfield as gra~tor and Richard D. I~ey: Jr_ Zi~ls, ~s ~rantees. ~r. Hsdriek stated that this da~e and time was advertised £er a public hear±ag to consider an ordiaznee to vacate ~O' right of way known as Grail Road within KinEsland Gardens Subdivision, Dele ~agieterizl District, Chesterfield County, Virginia. No one wac present ZO discuss Shis item, On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by ~r. Dodd, the Board adopted the following AN ORDINANCE to v~eate a 50' right of way known as Grail ~o~d ~i~hin ~in~sl~nd Gardens ~ubdivi- sion, D~le M~Eisterial DistriCt, Chesterfield Coun~y~ Virginia~ ~s 8hewn on pl~t thereof duly recorded in ~he Cl~rk'~ Office of the Circuit Court Of Chesterfield County in Plat Book 9 at Page 46. Whereas, JeAnn Cordle has petitioned the Bea~d of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, to vacat~ Qrail Road ~it~iB ~i~E~l~ud Ga~rdens Subdivision, Dale terl~l Dis~rict, Chesterfield County, VirEinia, more particularl, sho~ on a pla~ of record in ~h~ Cl~rk's Office of th~ Court el said County in Pla~ Book 9, at page 46, made by Pkilllp H. Brooks ~d Kenneth L~ Barton, dated April 20, 1955. The por~ion of r~Eh~ o~ w~y petitioned to be vacated is more Grail Ro~d be~innin~ on the ~orth line of Evetake Reid ~nd extending in ~ ~ortherly direction location of which is more fully showA outtimed in red on a plat made by Phillip H. Brooke and L. BarZon, dlted April 20~ 1955, ~ copy of which is of the Code of Virginia~ 1950, as ~nded, by ~dver~isin$; ~d, 81-454 I0. B. 11. 10. of the right of way ~ought to be vacated ~d the vacation will not ab~idge the rights of ~ay citizen. New, Therefore, Be It Ordained By the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia: That pursuant te Section 15.1-Rgb(b) of the Code of Viyginia, 1950, as ~nemded, the above de~gribed righ% o£ way is h~reby vacated ~nd is no lon~er ~e~essary for public use. This Ordinance ~hgll be in full force mnd ef£ent in accordance with Section 15.1-daB(b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, ~ ~mended, ~nd a cer~xfied copy of this Ordinance, ~ogezher wi~h ~he plat attached here~o, shmll be recorded no sooner than thirty daym h~reaf%mr ig lh~ Clerk'm of the Circui~ Cour~ of Chesterfield, Virginia, pursuit to Section 1~.1-488 of the Code of Virginia, 1960, am ~ended, The ~%ect Of =his Ordinance parsu~ ~o SeeZion l~.l-dSS im to destroy the force ~d ~ff~ct of the recording Of portion of ~he plat vacated, AdcordinEly, this Ordinmnce mhall b~ indexed in the Of the Co~y of Chesterfield as grma~or amd OoAnn Cordl~ amd J~em ~illis, or their Succemmorm in title, ~ grante~m. On motion of Mr. Bookman, meeonded by ~r. Dedd, =he Boerd authorized the County Administrator to accept a D~ed o£ Dedicmtien on behalf of The County from Wask~y En~erpriaem, Inc.~ ~ Virginia Corporation, ~ap Section: 1~-16 (~lulay Dell Acre~), On motion of Mr. Bookman~ seconded by Nr. Dodd, the Board guthorized the County Administrmtor to ~ceept g D~ed of Dedicmtion on behmlf of the County ~rom Edwin Gordon ~lidewetl mud Gertrude Y, GlidewelI~ Mmp Section : ad-lO (we~t of Old Hundred Romd, ~idlothian District). Vote: Uamaimous ~r. Bookman excused himself from the meetinE~ On me, ion of ~rs. Girone: seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approved the following sewer contract, subject ~o the proper contrmct form, for Pocoshock Hills, Section 4, Offeite and Onslte Develorer: D. X. Bowlin Contractor: Bookman Construction Company Total ConZrmot Cost: $50,8~4.00 Estimated County Cost: 15,398.9~ (Refund thru Connection~ Code: ~?4-]-llTgl-?~l ($15,~95_~4 - refund ~hr~ connections) No. of Connections: ~ Ayes: ~r. Daniel, Mr. Dodd, MT~. Girone~ Nr. O'Neill Absent: Mr. Bookman 81-4~5 11. Mr. Bookman returned to the meeting, Mr. Painter gave a report of Developer Water and Sewer Contracts approved and executed by the County A~ninistrator. Mr. gedriek stated that ~he Highway Department had formally notified the County that ~he roads in the follewinE subdivisions September 3, 1981. Stevens Hollow - S~cti~n I Lensth Stevens ~oll©w Drive - Beginning at zta knte~- section with Turner Road, Route 650~ extending northeast 0~0~ mile to the intersection of North Btevens Hollow Drive and South Stevens Hollow Drive. 0.04 Mi. South Stevens Hollow Drive - Beginnin~ at its intersection with Steven~ Hollow Drive &ed North Btevens Hollow Drive, ex~eadiag northeasterly 0.09 mile to a dead end. 0.09 Mi. North Stevens Hollow Drive - Beginning zt its intersection with Stevens Hollow Drive ~nd South Stevens Hollow Drive, extending 0.07 mile to the intersection of Hollow Wood Court then northeast 0.13 mile to a dead end. 0.~0 ~i. Hollow wood Court - ReginninE ~t it~ intersection with North Stevens Hollow Drive, extending north- west 0.04 mile to a cul-de-sac, 0.04 Hi. Mr. Eedrick stated that ~he HiEhway Department had notified the County that the rOad~ in t~e £ollowinE subdivisions h~d been accepted into the State Seoond~ry System effective September lO, 195i~ County Home ~states - Section I Length Bridle Path Drive - ReEinn~ng at the intersec- tion with River Road (Route $6) ~d northwest 0.12 mile to end in ~ temporary turnaround. 0.1~ Rural Addition Length S~tinwood Drive - Se~innin~ at Route ~43 continuin~ in eeeterly direction 0~10 mile to a oul-de-sao. 0.13 Mi. It was generally agreed that She Bo~rd would ~eot on Tuosday~ October 6, 1981 at 10:30 a.m. in Room 502. Administration Buildin~ to hold a Budget Work Session. It was Sener~lly agreed to sohedule a second Budget Session at 10:00 a.m. on the next re~ul~rl~ scheduled Board meeting day, October li, 1981 in the Board of Supervisors Meetin~ Room, at the Courthouse. gl-430 ].:3, K. A. ~.econvening at 2:60 p.m. In Bermuda N~isteri&l District, PHILLIP R, $CRUGGS requested ~ Conditional Use Planned Development to permit a child day ~are centey ~nd o×~eption to the paviaE requirement for the p~rkia~ lot and ~n exception to ~he perkins &nd driveway ~e~back in a Residential (~-7) Distric~ on ~ i ~nre p~rsel fronting approximately 120 feet on Wesf Hundred Road also frontin~ ~pproxim~tely ~R0 ~eet on ~euntetair Eo~d ~nd located in the northeast q~adr~nt of the interSeo$ie~ Of these roads, Pa× N~D 116-5 (3) Dzlewood, Leto llA, 12A. end 13A (Sheet 32). ~r. galdsrson was present, and s~a~ed that th~ Planning 2ommission has recommended denial of this request. He further ~t~ted that the ~ppIioant has reGuested withdrawal of this · pplication. On motion of ~r. Dodd, seconded by ~r. Bookman, ~he Bo~rd voted to ~llow withdrawal of this request. Unanimous BlSllO In Bermuda Magisterial District, FRANK ~ KATELEEN BLANh, requested a ~0~i~9 ~ome Permit ~o park a mobile home on property which belongs to Barbara Meanley, daughter cf ~he applicants+ Tax ~aD 97-4 (2) Central P~rk, Block 1t, Sheet 3B). 'here was no opposition present. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Nr. O~NeilI, the Board approved this request for a period of five years, Fete: Unanimous BLS065 In Clover Hill Mggisterigl District, H. H. ADANS, SR. r~quested ~ C0ndi~ion~l Use to permit a stock farm (rio chickens) in a ~esidential (R-T) District on a 1.5 ~c~e p~rcel fre~ing ~Dprextmately ES0 feet on the e~st lice of Reck Spring Drive and loo~ed directly across fxem its intersection wi~h J~unson Road. Tax ~ap 5~-5 (5) Rock Sprtn~s Farm, Section B, BloGk ~ Lot 14 (Shee~ t5). The applic~.qt was present. ~r. ~er$on ~ated that the ~l&nni.g Commission has recommended denial of this request, Hr. ~eokman noted that staff had researched this request, and recon~ended a four (4) to six (6) month deferment during which time the fowl would be removed from this location. After f~rth~r discussion, On mOtiOn of Mr. Bookman, seconded by ~rs. ~irone~ the Board deferred this rcques~ for si~ (6) months, with the understanding that the applican~ should deplete his stock of ehioken~. Vote: Unanimous 81-437 B. 13. Is Dale Magisterial Distric~ T~ K~VMAB C0~J~.%NY requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) fo Residential (R-7) of approximately ~ 2g,2 acre parcel which lies ~ The north terminus of Ladue Road and also located at the southeastern ~erminus of Cransoa Road. Tgx ~gp 9~-~ (1} Pm~ oX Pmrcel 1 (Sh~ ~1). ~lr. Du~ood Fel~o~ w~S present representin~ the ~pplic~nt8, ~d St~d that thi~ r~qu~st had b~en ~onded from ~he ori~ingl ~pplication for rezonin~ to E-TH wi~h Cot~ission recon~ended appmoval. ~r. D~i61 ques~ione~ whsths~ ~he houses ~o be constructed ~ould be in ke~pin~ with the style ~nd quality of those in S~lem Woods Subdivision, Mr. Felton indicated zhat it ~ his underst~ding that they would be, and verballp thm~ this was ~he intention of the developer. Mr_ D~i~I a~ked that this condition be incorporzted in the minutes, to show Nfs. Helen Lewis, ~ ~dj~cent property owner ~ms presen%~ ~nd ·sked to address the Board. She stated that she was ~ot opposed ~o ~his rezonin~, but ver~ c~ncerned ~on~ proper m~mmure~ being t~en for drmina~e~ ~r. Bglderson *xpl~imed th~ procedure r~uired by ~he County Envirc~ent~l Engineering plat could be reco~ded~ znd %hz~ the developer must submit drminmge plmnm prior to construction, s~c. After further digc~on o~ mo~io~ of ~r. Daniel: seconded by ~. Dodd~ th~ Board mpproved this r~quest with %he unders~gndin~ that the developer will construct homes of the type ~d style A~inigtr~tor %0 h~v9 th~ Director of Co.unity Development and NfS. Lewis, ~dj~oept proper~y owner, meet to discuss any drmin~E~ problem~ she m~y be concerned about. Vote: Unanimous 91S072: In Dale Magisterial District, RALIArDA AB~OCIATE~ requested reZo~ing from Agricultural (A) to Residential Townho~se-for- Sal~ (R-TH) of 9.6 acres, to Office Business (0) of 8 acres, to Convenience Business (B-I) of 19.8 acres, and to Ligh~ Development en¢ompa~iDg thc entire 1O~ acre tract to both bulk ~d ~se exceptions to the Zoning Ordinance on a parcel frosting ~pp~oximat~ty 3800 feet on Courthouse Road also fronting gpproximmtely t800 feet on Iron Brid~e Road and located in the northwest quadrant of The intersection of th~e ro~dS. Tax ~mp 95-$ (1) Parcel 21 and Tax ~ap 79-15 <1) P~roel I0 (Sheets ~ ~nd $1). Mr. Hml Hayes was present representing the applicant, and noted that ~11 the conditions, and proffered conditions were ~gr%egble. Nr. Balderson s~ated that the Planning Commission rsoommonded approval subject to cer~min conditions ~d proffered conditions. D~iel asked i~ ~yone present wished to spe~ to this issue of ~y possible dr~inz~e problem, ~]d asked that the County ensure that proper drainage be required now in order that the taxpayers ~honld not have to bear the burden of drainage impzovemenZ at a la, er da~e. ~r. B~tder~on explained the process necessary and required by the CounSy as h~ had %o the citizen wi~h 5he s~e concerns in ~he previously heard cmse. After further discussion, on mo~ion of D~niel, seconded by Mr. Dodd~ the Board approved this item. subject to the following conditions: 81 4~8 1. The developer shall provide an accurafe acCo%mt of the The developer shall submit a plan to Environmental Esgineerin¢ utilized in the hydraulic en¢ineerin¢ of %his project. This plan shall be approved by the Pl~nipg Commission at the time of schematic approval for the first building constructed mhd in conjunction with Environmental Engineering. This plan shmll be lpproved prior fo the clearing of ~¥ lmnd ~]d implemented prior to the issuance of ~ny occupancy permit. ~. The developer shall submit a plan for erosion end sediment control to Environmental Esgineeriag. Such a plan shall be in the "~rosion and ~edimect Control Technical ~an~beok" publishe~ by the J~mes River Soil and Water Conservation District) t~ he utilized as erosion ~nd sediment control measures for the projeet~ The plan shall he approved by Environmental En~ineering prior to the issnance of any buildin~ permit ~nd impR~m~nt~d prior to olearing ~ny las~. $. Public water and sews= shall be used cad the developer shall Utilities Dep~rtment prior to th~ issaanoe of ~ny buildin~ as mat be determined bT the OountT Riehl-of-Way Engineer, shall be grouted to the Coun%y of Chesterfield prior to the issuance o~ ~ny building DermiS. 4. Internal parking areas shall he curbed in a manner acceptabl ~o ghe Development Review a~ %he time Of site plan This curbing shall be for the purpose of ch~elizing tr~ffie, have at least ten (~0) squ~e feet of interior landscaping contain a minimum of fifty (50) square feet and sh~ll h~v~ mi~irmma dimeasion of ~t least five (5) square feet ~nd shill i~el~de ~t least one tree hmving a clear t~nk of a~ leas~ five (~) ~e~t, with ~he remaining ~re~ adequately l~dsc~p%d with ~h~ Sround cover or other authorized · at~rial not to exceed three (3) felt i~ height. The u~ber of trees shall not be less th~n one (1) f~r such ~o hundred (~00) square feet or fr~ctiOn thereof~ of the located in M~¢h g ~r so ~s ~o divide ~d b~e~ up the 9xp~nse of p~vin~. The are~ desi~nated ~s recurred setbacks ~hich ts exposed to an abu~tin~ righ~-of-w~y shall be S~Oh l~d~c~Qi~¢ ~hall include one t~ee for each ~0 lineal feet or fraction thereof. Such trees shall be located between the ~b~i~g right-of-way and off-street parking are~ or other vuhicular use areas ~nd shall be planted in an are~ 0f twenty-five (~5) sqnare feet with a dimension of ~% least feet. The remainder o~ ~h~ r~quired landscaped areas shall be plated with grass, groun~ oover~ or o~her landscape ~rea~meu% ~xot~dinE Dav~me~, All property other th~n the required l~dsc areas or other vehicular usx areas shall be planted with grass, or ether ground cover. ?. A landscapin~ pl~u depicting the requirements in Conditioas 5 ~-ud 8 shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for approvz zn ~enjunction with schematic pl~u review. 81-439 ed ~. A frges~anding sign shall be permitted along proposed Relocated Courthouse Read Md alto along ROUte 10 ldentifying sign shall not exceed 100 square feet in area and a height of twenty-five (25) feet. NO other freest~udiag sicns (nther than directional) shall be pgrmitt~d along these roadways. the development m~d not visible to either Relocated Courthouse Rosd, Courthouse Road er Route l0 shall be permitted. except in the Light Industrial (~ 1) area where signs shall be regulated by the requirements of the Zoning Ordinane~. 9. Each freestanding co:mmercial ~nd office buildin~ a~tached to the facade, not to e~ceed a total aggre~a~ area Of .5 sqUar~ feet for e~ch one (1) foot of building fronfage. These mign~ ~h~lI al~o blend wi~h the architectural style 10. One (1) sign, no~ to exceed twenty-five (25) square fee~ ~d six (6) feet in heiEht~ id~ntlfyin~ Zhe Industrial Park~ Road ~o She LisZt Industrial {~-1) tracZ. This sign shall neither be luminous nor illuminated. p~ck~e shall be submitted ~o the Pl~nin~ C~ission for schematicapproval. Thi~ p~ck~E~ shall include typical styl~s, 12. No other advertising sisns, other th~ thos~ identifylnE 1S. In the Coavenienc~ Business (B-l) tract, repair of automobiles shall be prohibited. be considered an integral p~rt of the overall development ~d re~lated by Zonin~ Ordin~nc~ requiremenTm ~elative shopping centers. 15. The multi-f~ily tr~et (Parcel 3) shall be develop~d accord~ce with AlSernate PI~ 2. (Note: Condition ~3) 15. Per the requir9ments of the BOCA Code~ all internal driveways shall have a minim~ width of twenty-four (24) feet. 17. Outside storage shall be prohibited in the Li~hz ~ndustriml (M-l] tract. 18. The mnlzi-f~iI~ residential development in PareeI ~ $h211 be oriented toward Relocated Courthouse Ro~d and zhe inZernal 19, A thirty (30) foot buffer shall be maintained alonE th~ ~d a zwen~y (~0) foo~ b~Ifer along the southern and boundaries of ~he Oifice Busines~ (0) area. These buffers sh~ll effective screen of the rear f~c~des of the buildings, p~rkin$ and loadin~ areas. $1-440 If the rear facades of the buildings are treated so ~ to have screened. Specific landscapin~ plans depicting these requirements shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval in conjunction with schematic pl~u review. 20. The facades of the buildings located along proposed ~elocated Courthouse Re~d shall be treated a~ f~onts and loading ~acilinies shall not be permitted along theme roadways. If the rear facades gte net treated as front~ and loading facilities do abut this roadway, they shall be screened from view of the roadway with exiating vegetation S~pplemeated with additional pl~uting and berming where necessary to provide an effective screen. A landscapin~ plan depietin~ these require- in conjunction with schematic plan review. 21. i fifty (50) foot buffer shall be maintained along the lengths of tho multi-family cad industrial park tracts which abut existing and Relocated Courthouse Roa~. A fi~y (50) foot huf~er shall also be m~intained alon~ the aorthwe~ter~ ~eundary of the M-1 Distric~ and ~long the ~-1 botmd&ry which ~buts the Route l0 right-of-way. ~ fifty (~0) foot buffer shall a~so be maintained between the multi-family and the ia their aatural state and supplemented with additional be submittsd to the Planning Co~is~ion for ~pprovll in Development, shall b~ p~itted through Duffer ~rexs described h~rein. Also, sign~ ~ described herein sh~ll be pe~izTed in ~hese buffer are~. ~. The conditions contained herein aotwithsta~dinE the plan prepared by Con. unity Bevelopment for pnblie road~ays access, and turn lmues shall be adhered to. The applicaat'a ~a~ter Plan shglt be ~mended accordingly. ~. Courthouse Road Relocated shall have a ~imimum right-of- w~y of not less th~u I10 feet for a distance of not less than 200 feet from Route 10 followed by a ninety (90) foot right-of way for th~ remaining length. Prior to the release of any bnilding permits, these rights-of-way shall be dedicated to ~d for the County of Chesterfield ~ree ~d unrestricted. 25. Forty-five (45) feet of right~of~way, measured from the centerline of Courthouse Road, for ~he en%ire length of the property ~bu~tiag this roadway shall be dedicated to and for the County of Chesterfield, free ~nd unrestrietsd~ This dedication shall be accomplished prior to the release of ~ny buildia~ ~6. Relocated Courtkouse Eoa~ shall be conatruc~ed as four l~nes with a sixteen (16) foot median and turn lanes~ shown on the plan prepared ~y Community Development. Two lane~ ~hall be completed and ~ccepted into the State System prior to ~he is~ance of any occupancy pe~it on Parcel 1 on Parcels 2 ~d 3. 27. Route 10 shall be widened at its intersection with Relocated Courthouse Road to allow for turn lanes. The design and construe of these lanes s~aI1 con~erm to VDH&T standards and t~ken into the State System prior to the issue]ce of any occupancy permit. 81-441 t 29. Townhouses-For-~ale All lots developed for tewnhouse residences shall conform to zoning requirements for the R-TH District. B. Density shall not exceed ~ units per acre. The lot area for each dwelling shall be not ]sss than 4000 SQU~re feet provided that eo~en open space eqnivatent to the ~unount by which each lot is reduced below 5000 square feet shall be provided within 500 feet of e~¢h such lot. The minimum lot width at the stree~ right-of-way linc shall be ~0 feet provided ~he minimum lot width a~ the building line shall be 50 feet. Not more than 30 percent of all lots de,eloped may have let widths ~t the street line of less th~ 40 f~t in width. All b~iIdings on any lot iacludin~ ~ccessorp buildings sh~ll not have a het~h~ Eres~er than ~wo s~oriee ~nd of the lo~. ~o aeeeeeery b~ilding (except garages shall cover me~e th~u one hundred (10o) spuare feet. Each lot not frontin~ on 2 through streef shall have a frost yard which shall be at least ~en (lO) feet in dept~ provided that ~t least two p~rking spaces shall be provided on the lot or in ~ parkin$ area. Lots frontin$ on a through street shall have ~ front cr rear yard o~ no less th~n thirty (30) feet. Setbacks and indentations ef building on adjacent Nots shall be varied in such a m~nne~ ~7ont ysrd on ~ ~orner lot be less than t~en~y-~wo lest. Each lot shal5 have a5 least one side yard. Such sid~ yard or s~m of two side yards shall be no leSS than %e~ (lC) feet provided that there ~h~ll be ao windows or Othez openings ever <we (2) square feet in are& ~djaeen~ to a side yRrd which is less than five (§) feet. The minimum dis%ante between b~ildinss m~y be ~edueed 70 eigh~ (8) feet (~nd the required yard likew&se) provided that She corners of the buildin§s overlsp not more than four,sen (1~) feet; that ~here are no openings over two (~) square feet in area of ~ueh walls at suc~h ~ location ~nd that ~here shall be no more than four (4) ad, scent units with the side yards so reduced. Each lot shall have a rear yard of not less than twenty five (25) feet except in cases in wbi¢~ the ~ear minimum~ width adjacent to the Io~ of ~hirty ($0) if wooded or fifty (50) feet if non-wooded. Then the r yard of s~cb lot may be red~eed to fifteen (15) fee~. The density OX development shall not e~ceed five dwelling ~nits per gross acre. 81-442 h. Fences up to three (2) feet in heigh; in tie front yard and in ~11 other yards fencing up to seven (7) in bsi~ht may be used provided that it is w~otly within the property lines and conforms with tko corner side y~rd requirements. i. Recreational f~eilities eh~ll be provided in with requirements of the E-TH zenin~ district. Condominium Homes cluster type or a combination thereof, b, The overall density of such residential development s~ll not exceed seven (7) unit~ per ~rom~ acr~. two stories. d, ~o more than twenty-five (25) percent of the e. There shall be no minimum lo~ area established for development coueep~ dues not provide for conveyance of land. f. The minimum yard dimensions provided in tbs R-TH zenin residential structures. The minimum y~rd dimensions provided herein ~nder Cluster Homes (BO above) shall apply to developm~n~ o~ detached residentiml Kecreational facilities sh~ll be provided for ~ondominium development in accordance with requirements of the H-TH zoninc 8treet~ within the Parcel 3 may be private or public ~ dedicated street by a common easement within five hdndred (500) feet. Condition #1§ listed before is hereby eliminated. Ail other conditions applicable ~o Parcel 3 shall be ~dhered tO, ~ifteen (I5) percent o~ ~he ~,6 seres indicated by ~he applicant's textual s~atement. 3~. ~o residential unit shall ha~e an interior ~ress square footage of lee~ th~n 1,$00 square 36. Those freest~uding building~ located within Parcel which front Route lO ~hhll be limited to one of ~he followin a. office buildings ~, re~ur~ul~ (e~eluddng f~ food) A~d f~rTher~ the Board ~eceDted the following proffered condition 81-443 PROTECTIVE COVENANTS~ CONDITIONS ~ND P~STRICTIONS FOR Tire KALINDA ASSOCIATES INDUSTRIAL PARK WHEREAS, Kalinda Associmtes, a Virginia Limited P~rtnership hereinafter re~erred to as "Kalinda", is the owner of the Ealinda Associates Industrial Park hereinafter referred to as "Park" WHEREAS, Hallnda intends ~o sell and/or lease parcels of l~3~d in the Park for industrial NOW~ THEREFORE, Hnldnda hereby declarss and provides that each and every paxcel of the ~ark shall be conveyed subject to the following conditions, covenants, restrictions which shall be binding upon the 6rant~, his heirs, su¢opssors, or assigns, to insure proper use and appropriate development of e~ch building site and the grounds 5hereo~; ~o pretec~ the environment mud aesthetics in this Park; to guard against the erection thereof of Structures buil~ of improper or unsuitable materials~ and in general to provide for a high quality of development so fha~ each buildiR~ site will not adversely ~ffect ~he health or saf~y of residents or workers in the area nor be detrimental tO the ~e oP development of olher properties ~n the Park, and FURTHER, that a cody of this covenant shall be r~cerdcd in the Cle~'$ Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County: Virginia, and sh~ll be binding upon a/~d r~n~ing with the land~ in¢ludiR~ eac~ ~n~ every parcel whetho~ sold or l~as~d in whole o in part and by reference made a part o£ sash and every deed, option, lease or other grant o~ any interss~ in parcel thereof as a part of the terms hereof. A. Approval of Plan~ 1. No improvements, signs, outdoor lighting, fences, walls or public utility ~True%ures shall be erect@d, or altered on any build~ng sits until the buildin~ or other improvement pI~u/s: specifications mud plat plan ~Nowing ~he lnem~ion of such improvements on ~he p~r~i~ulRr building site have been ~ubmitted to and approved in writing by the Architectural Revie~ Board 5s to eonformi~y and harmony of external design with existing structures in development, a~d aS tO location Of the improvements on the buildxn~ sits ~ivin~ due re~ard ~o ~he an~iolp~ted use with re~pec~ to topography, grade and finished ground ele~ltion. person or firm occupying the premises shall be permitted, sh~ll be erected or altered without the prxor approval Cf the County Plannin~ Dir~ctor~ 81-444 3. Landscapin& shall be required in ~ form ~tud manner scc~pt~ble to, amd acsordin~ te plo~s.apDrovod ~n writin~ by the Architectural Eeview Board. B. Yard Requirements x~d Uses The minimum front yard setback sh~lI be fifty (50) feet, The m~xim~ f~o~t yard setback ahall be one hundred and (ll0) feet. 5ear yard setbacks shall be no less thirty (30) feet ~nd side yard setbacks shall be ne less tha~ twenty-five (25) feet, unless oZherwise specified in khe subdivision pla~ of smid Dark, which shall be oontrollin~ except ~h~t ~he minimum corner side y~rd sh~%l be fifty ~50) ft. C. P~kim~ ~equirements the minim~ front yard s~tback for the parking of any &~tomobil~s~ trucks~ equipment, or the s~or~e of ~ny m~teri~l 2. The Gr~t~e sh~ll provide p~ved off-s%reet p~rking 9. No p~zklns, lo~dlnE, or unloading shall be permitted D. Building Requiremonts be limited to three stories or fif~F ($0) ~ee~ whichever 2. The mi~i~ Size of the principle buildin~ sh~ll be 7,000 Squ~re feet. homes, or ~tora~e facilities shall be stored on a except such buildings, trailers, homes or facilities which mmy be necessmry durinE cons%~ction periods E. Eain~en~nce of Buffer Area to the fifty (50) ~oo~ buZZer area ~ron~inC on Courthouse Road, sh~lI h~ve the responsibility of maint~i~i~E the other natural ~ro~h sh~ll be cut or removed without the ~ood zD~e~r~ce m~ all ~imes. Ali ~r~ss and weeds shall tmined satisfactorily to H~lindm, H~linda m~y serve written notice upon the owner or his z~nt ~nd if not complied with within one week, Haliuda may correct ~ No operation, m~nuf~otu~e, or building use in p~rk skalJ he~t, liEht~ iadustri~l w~s~e, toxic m~tter, or odors 81-445 3. Site sto~m] drainage mainten~]ce $~a!l be performed by the ~ramtse. Applicability t. The yight is hereby expressly reserved by Halinda to modify, ~lfer or a~end all er any Dart of these covenants, circtlm~t~nees justify. ~o~ever, under no circumstances shall any rsstrictioa herein be modified~ altered er amended so as ~o make them lee~ reef~ietive than stated herein. 2. Th~ enforcement of the restrictions and covenants contained within this Resolution shall ~e Yy preceedings viela~ia~ or attemDtin~ ~o violate any covenant, by ~ny owner or owners of lots in said park er ~y th~ which shall rem&in in full force and effect. thereon whether by gr~ntor or anyone else complies wi~h, regulations, the sole raspon$ibili;y for all of s~e being upon the grates and grantor is hereby expressly relemsed ~d relieved o~ any and ~ll liability in connection 5. Those pxotectiv~ covenants, conditions amd restrictions shall be in full force and effect i~ediz~ely upon adoption by resolution of the Board of Supervisors. It sh&ll b~ in effect for a p~riod of ~w~nty (20) years '~d shall be automatically renewable for successive Voze: Unanimous In Bermuda Magisterial District, DIC~ ALLEN, I~C., requested rezo~ing from Community Business (B-2) to Generzl Business (B-3) Of a 1 acre parcel fronting approximately I90 feet o~ the north line of West Eundred Road and located approximately t~0 feet west of its iatereectioD with Chester Road. Tax Map 115-7 (1) Parcel 49 <Sheet SS). Mr. Allen was present. After discussion, on motion of Mr, Dodd~ ~eoondsd by Mr. Bookman, the reGueet to re.one to (B-3} was d~nied, and a Conditional Use ~l~nned Deveiopment Permit was ~pproved~ subject to schematic plans bein~ approved by the Planning ¢o~issien. ve~e: Unanimous $~-446 E. 13. F. 81~083: In Matoaca Nigisterial District, J~ES ~. TAYLOR~ JR,, requested a Conditional Use Planned Development to permit a medical clinic, private indoor and outdoor recreational ~anilitie~ a cookinE mud nutrition school, and amtock farm (5 Buffalos) in an Agricultural (A) Dis~rict on a 13.3 asre pmroel fronting approximately 700 feet on the west line of Branders Bridge Road and located approximately 1700 feet north of its int~r~ection with Lskeview Road. Tax Nap 174 (1) Pmrcel 28 iSheet 49). Mr_ Balderson ~tated that the Planning Con~sis~ion had reoon~nended approval of this reGu~st, subject to certain conditio~ Mrs. J~ff~e8 T~ylo~ was present ~eDresenting the applicant. ~r. O~Neill in~nired whether g d~ferral cf this request had been requested, and Mr. Balderson stated that the ~as ready to proceed today. ~r. O~Neilt requested additional information from staff, and it was genermlly agreed to table this request until l~ter ia the meeting. 818084: In Clover Hill and Midlothian Magisterial Districts, ~RRILL ~ATURAL R~ESOURCES~ INC. requests ~ Conditional Use Planned Qevelopment to permit the miriam o£ mmterials mud removal of natural e~r~h resources (including gas zed oil) from the earth or mubeoil. The applicants are reques~inE per~ismieu to drill ~n unspecified n~mber Of exploratory wells ~_ud if resources are found, 5o. pe~it zhe prodRe~io~ of ~hese resources. This request encompasses mpproxim~tely 1&,435 aor~s of land ~hich lies iB th~ Richmond Coal B~ein ~d more specifically ms shown on p~rts of zoning sheets 4, 5/~, T, ~5. Mr. Baldereen ~&ted t~t the Planein~ Commission had race--ended ~pprov~l of thiE request: subject to certain Ir. John Pain was prement representing the applicant. He noted that this was the las~ request in the seriss of rezsniu~ for this item. Er. Bookman inquired if any problems had arisen ~ith the drilling operatioas, ~r. B~lderson stated that through cooperative efforts slight problems h~Ve been resolved. There have been no environmental concerns~ or land use ~ompat~bilzty, ~nd that there are deposit~ of natural ~hich the eomp~n~ i~ pursuing. In all, it was not*d that this has been m positive experiesce relative 5o produc~ion~ ~r. Bookm~uu nota$ that SChematiC site plans h~v* been received on e~eh well, and distributed ~o all concerned, and the regulations of the Dure~u of Mines h~ve been followed, with ~t~ff inspection of ~ch ~it~ b~fore~ during: and ~fte~ ~ork done. Recl~im~zion of some sises h&m already begun. Hr. BOO~ further stated that the~e h~ been no other drillin~ Dy ~y o~her comply wi~houl the ~pprov~l o~ the gfter fur?her dissuasion, on motion of ~r. Bookm~n, Seconded by ~r. Dcdd, th~ Board ~pproved this request, subject ~o ~he fcllcwin~ conditions: 1. The apDlio~u~ts shall submit to Development R~view Gopies of plus submitted to the State for approval. These plans shall be maintained in the Community Development of£ice fo~ the pu~De~e of identifying the exact location of wells. 81-447 13. O. 2. OperaTions shall be conf±ne~ to between ~:00 a.m. and 9:00 p,m, ~ondsy through S~turdsy, No SUnd~y operazions shall be permitted. The hours of operation ~y he modi£ied such modification w~lI bo o~ ac detriment to ar~a property $. tf any materi~l, other ~han dirt, Stone and/or rook is buried on the slte~ a pl~t showing the loc=tion of the fill area ~all ~e submitted to Development Review and recorded in the Circuit Court Clerk's 0fXice with the property Construction of ~ny faoflitie~ over a fill Are~ ~haI1 not be permitted unless soil engineering sEudies prove the suitability Of such construction, The method of fill sh~ll be s par~ of the reolaima~±on 4. Should ~ny ~ells be productive, prior to any extraction, schematic plan~ shall b~ submitted to Dsvelopment Revi~v the District Dl~nninE Co~issioner affected for review approval. A~ ~he ~im~ of schsma~ic plan review~ stmff may impose ~y ~dd~tion~l conditions relative to the proteCtiOn Of tko he~l~, s~fe~y ~d well,me of the County. Vo~e: Uaanimeus In Bermuda ~agisteri~l District, ALVlE C. N, ~OLAND requested a Conditional Use to permit a stock farm IlO0 rabbitm) in a Residential (R-T) Die,riot on a .46 Acre parcel frontin~ approximately lO0 feet on the ~outhes~t line of Walnut Drive amd located ~pproximately 300 fee~ sou~hwes~ of its inter- section with Sir Peyton Drive. T~ ~p 138-12 (9) Fsrms, Section A, Blook A, Lot I (Shoot ~r. Balderson etaPed thug ~he Planning Commission reco~ended approval, subjecl to ¢o~dilions. ~r. Kol~d was present. He sta~ed that these rabbits were rated ~ in th~ Stato, and had a National ranking ol ~lO. H~ h~s ~ho~ ~his herd of rabbits ~ ~ convention in New York~ where they showed and placed ia competition. further s~ted that he has plans to relocate hi~ fabbitry, when he, himself, chaa~$ residences, and has a con~rac~ for purchase of land in ~other area~ He discussed the preventive measures ~en in clewing of' the ~re~ of r~bbitry, and ~oted that he has not had ~y complaints from neighbors in ~en years, un~il this time. He further discussed the use of the rabbits' m~ure, ~d i~$ positiv~ mspeo~s~ no~ing ~ha~ ~his w~s ~ 8our0e of revenue for him~ as he is a retired veter~, and on a l~i~ed income. Mr. bodd stated ~hat the Board h~s received a pe~ition from four of ~r. Roland's neighbors in objection to his keeping the r~bbits in a residential area~ (Thi~ peri,ion is filed ~ith the papers of this Board). ~lr. Dodd inquired as to the ~ason for Mr. Hol~d's keeping the srea~ number of ~d whether Mr. Roland had thmt n~ber ~o be~in wi~h. Roland ~tated thz~ he do~s sell his stock do~ in the ~0 ~bout half the presen~ number~ After further discussion, on mo~ion of Nr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Boo~, ~his request w~ deferred for six (6) months, with the understanding th~ Nr. Roland would relocate hi~ r~bbi~ry during that $1-44g 13. I. lB. J. 81S089: In Dale Magisterial District, W. S. CARNEs[ INC., requested a~ ~u~endment to ~ existing use pez~it (Case #TlA260) to permit a drive-in window for the Burger Chef RestaurRnt at Meadewbrook Plaza Shopping Center in a Community Business (B-2) District on a 22.65 Acre parcel fronting approximately 1000 feet on Hopkins ~oad also frontin~ approximately 1800 feet on Chippenh~ra Parkway and located in the northwest quadran~ of The intersection of these roads. Tax E~p 52-S (1) Psrcel ? (Sheet IS). Mr. Balderson stated that ~he ~laanin~ Commission has recommended approval of this request. ~r. Joh~ Dodson was present repmessn~nE the ~pplic~n~. A~tsr discussion, on mo~ien of Nr. D~Jaiet, seconded by Dodd, this request was approved, subject to submission of a sits plan to the Pl~nnin~ Commission. elS090: In Hidlothian ~agistsrial District, SYCANORE ~EWS ASSOCIATES requested an ~mendment to a p~evieusly granted ConditionaI Uss C~ss #798025) to pSr~dit construction of a wooden fence within ~ ~ug£er strip la a Residential (E-7) District on ~ ll.Ol acre ~arcel fronting approximately 5~0 feet on the north li~e of ~estfie/d Drive ~nd loo~ed directly across from its inte~- section with Syc~u~ore Square Drive. T~m Map 15-8 (D) Syncore Mews Condomfni~mS~ Pha~es t Red 11, Lots 1 - 68 Sheet 7). Ir. Baldersoe stated that the Planning Con~nission ha~ reco~ended approval, ~ubjec~ ~o conditions. the applic~ was prssent. ~r, John $~i~ w~ pre~en~, ~d discusssd the requirement for right-of-wly widenin~ regarding ~dj~c~nt p~operty. Zr. Balderson stated that this ma~ter w~s no% bein~ addressed at this time. The applicant stated that the requested fencim~ ~ould De seZ behind the widenin~ line, ~d that he could fovesee DO problem, After further discussion, on motion ~f MP~. Giro~e, 8eco~ded by ~r. Bookman, thc Board approved ~his request, $~bject to the following condirion~ as ~co~nended 5y the Planning Comia~ion: 1. All fences sk~lI be constructed of solid wood zed sh~ll Along ~ho fronts of the fences ZO be located along ~estfield Road, or:mental shrubs shall b~ plan%ed in ~ mmnner ~o ~8 to bre~ the monotony of lhe fence line. A specific l~dscapinE pl~ depictin~ this requiremen~ $h~ll b9 submitted to Development Review for approval. ~1S092: In Matoaca Magisterial District, L. C. COLE AND R, M, ALLEN re~ussted ~n ~dmen~ to a previously gr~nted use permit (Case #74A051) to permit construction of ~ picnic ~elter in ~ Community Business (B-2) District on a 5 acre parcel fronting ~pproximalely ~0 feet on the south line of Iron Bridge Ro~d · nd located approximately 200 feet west of its intersection ~ith West Booker Boulevard. Tax ~p 114-11 (1) Parcel ~0 (Sheet 1) 13. ~. BaldeTaen stated that th9 Pt~nn~ng Commission has reconmlended approval, subject to conditions. Mr. R. M. Allen was present. There was no opposition present. On motion of Mr, O'Neill, seconded By ~r. Dodd, ~he Board approved thi~ request, subject to the following conditions: 1. All previously imposed conditions for Case 74A051 shall remain in effect. 2. The pl~ submitted with the application shall be considered the pls-q Of development. Vole: Unanimous ~15106: In D~le Magisterial District DUPONT FIBERS E~[PLOY~ES CREDIT UNION, INC., ~eq~ested ~ Conditional Uss Planned Development to permit a 113 foot exception to the 200 foot setback to the 50 foot setback alon~ major arterials; ~nd a 86 foot approximately ~00 feet north o£ its intersection wi~h Ooolsby Avenu~ T~x ~ap Be-3 (l) Part of P~rcel 1 (~h~et r~comm~nd~d approval of ~his request, subject To conditions. w~s no opposition present.. On motion of ~r. ~aniel~ seconded by Mr. Dodd~ ~h~ approved this request, subject to the foI1owiDg conditions: 1, Th~ below $l~4 oondilio~$ ~o~wi~hs~iing, the Site pl~ prepared by Atkinson/Dye~ A~itects, ~d submi~tad wi~h the application shall be considered tke mast*~ 2. The intersection of ~he proposed driveway at Route 1 shall 3, The area lying between the Jeffersoa Davis JeXfermon Davis Highway ~nd underb~sh. 4. All parkin~ ~nd driveway areas sh~lI be paved. 5. The u~es p~i~ted sh~ll ~e limited ~o the Dupon/ Credit union, th~ Planing Conm]ission shzll grant schematic plan ~pproval Vote: Uns~nimoue $1-4§0 19, glSlOg~ In Bermuda ~isterial District, VIRGIMIA NATION-WIDE GENEI~AL REKTAL CENTER requested an ~mendment to a previously granted Conditional Use Planned Development (Case tO permit a luminous siEn in ~ community Business District on a .T acre purcel fronting approximately ?0 feet On the southeast line of West Hundred Re~d and located approximately 200 feet soughwsst of its intersection with Lee Street. T~x ~ap 115-10 (~) She,d-Curtis Addltion~ LO~S 1SA ~d 16 (Sheet Hr~ Balderson stated tha~ the Pinning Co~ission tone,ended approvml of this request~ subject to conditions. The applicant w~s present. There w~s no opposition present~ On motion of ~r. Dodd, s~cond~d by ~r. O'Neill, the ~pproved ~his r~Gues~, sub, eot to the following 1. The sisn's lights shall be turned off ~t or prior ll:00 p.m. This condition shmll be ~plicabl~ un~il the two ~dj~cent lots to the west develop conm~erciallp. In ~atoana Magisterial District, J~XE~ ~. TAYLOR, JR., ~.D. requested a Conditional Use Planned Development to permit medical clinie~ private indoor and outdoor recreational ~ cooking end nutrition school, and a stock farm (~ Buffa3os) in an A=ri~ultural (A) District on a 13.S acre fronting approximately ?00 feet On =he west line of Branders Brid~e Road and located approximately l?00 feet north of its intersection with Lakeview ~oad, T~ Map 174 (1) Parcel 2S (sheet 49). This item had been deferred earlier in the meetisg. Er. Balderson stated that the Planning Commission ha~ recommended approval~ subject to conditions. Tko applicant was present. ~o opposition was present. ~r. O~NeitI inquired of the ~pplicant if the cOnditiOnS were aoeept ~ble, and the applicant ~reed that ~hey ~ere. Mr. Daniel inquired if the buffalo were to be r~ised for markeP, and th~ appligant stated ~ha~ they were to be kept as pet stock, only. After further discussion, un motion of Nr, O~Neill, seconded by ~r. Dodd, the ~oard ~pprcved this r~q~et, subjeo= to the 1. The 9I~ submitted with the ~pplic~tion titled "Concept Plan" shall be considered the ~as~sr ~, In conjunction wi~h approval of this request, the Planning Commission shall grant sohem&t~¢ approval of the ~aster Pl~. $, The ph~in$ plan submitted with ~ke ~pplic~t2on ~h~ll direct the order of developm%nt. Whil6 it is not necesszry that const~ction occur within any time limttstious~ it shzll occur the m~er indicated on th~ pk~sinE pl~ ~ by the temtu~l statement. 4. A landso~Din~ 91~n sh~ll be submitted to Development ~v~ew for ~pprovxl prior ~o $he r~le~e of ~y buildin~ ~h~bb~ry indic~tud on %he ~s%er Plmn ~d mmy mddi~ion~l pl~in 81-451 5, A fifty (50) foot buffer shall be provided along the east property line. This buffer shall be planted wish a minimum with ornamental plmnts, as indicated on th~ ~a~zeP Plan. Within this buffer thater shall be permitted one (10 a five (3) fcc% wide fitness 5rgil~ and one (1) sign. 6. There shall be only one (1) sign permitted for this use, This sign shall act exceed eight (g) spuare %eat in are~ and shall neither bs luminous nor illu~iaated. ~rior to of the si~n~ ~ colored renderi~ ~hall be submitted to ~v~opm~nt R~view 7. A twenty-five (25) foot buffer shall be provided along exception of z five (5) fcc% wid~ fi%Bess %~il ~nd solid board fence in the northern buffer. In the no~thern buffer, ~ six (6) foot high solid beard feacm ~h~ll ~e D~ovided lot fifty (50) feet to /he east and west, m~asured from g point to the north. In a~dition, at both ends o~ the solid g. A ~ift~ (SO) foot buffer sh~I1 be provided ~lon~ western proper~y line. No cut~ing~ clemring or ~r~dig~ shall (~) foot wide fitness 10. Co.tissue curb mud gu=%er shall be provided mroHnd ali draiam~e analysis, it is dare.lined to be unnecessary, ~hen . Hours of opermtion ~h~ll be limited ~o between ?:00 mud ~:00 p.m., Sunday ~hrou~h Thursday. ~ridmy and to project light into mdj~c~n~ properties. 15. Alt barn ~d pmddock mre~s for ~he buffmlos sh~ll be shall be applied to eliminite th~ prolifsratiom of ods2 aaa 16. To comply ~ith the G~ne~l Plan ~000, thirty-five (35) feet of right-of-way, ~or ~he entire ~eng~h of the property shall be dedicated to and for ~he County of Chesterfield, free ~d unrestricted. Thi~ ded~ca$ion shall be accomplished ~rior to the imEuznce of ~y building Building Conf~reno~ Room. Vo~*~ Unanimous ~1~452 C /--% BOARD OP SUPBF~VISO~%S October 6, 1981 Mr. Harry G. Daniel, Chairman Mr. B. Garland Dodd, Vice Chairman County Administrator Staff in Atteudance: Mr. Stev~ Attorney Mr. Lane Ramsay, Direc=o Budget and Accounting Mr. E. Merlin O'neill, Sr. Mr. Daniel called the me,ting to order at the Courthouse at 10:4. a.m. (EDST)~ Mr. Hedrick stated that Mr. O~NeiI1 would not be present at the meeting ~uday as he was ill. ~r. Daniel s=ate~ that the County Administrator and staff had be~n in~tructe4 to look at trends, the cost of government here ii Chesterfield County and to look at financial planning over the next thr~e years. ~e stated ~hat although this is the third yea: that Chesterfield has prepared a financial forecast, the conce~t is relatively new in legal government to publicly examine the financial projections of the governing body for ~he purpose of strategic planning. He pointed out to the Board that today'~ p~esentation is not a program budget but more of a financial pla~ to identify areas of financial cOnCern to the Board. ~. Hedrick stated that the Administration would ~ike to hold three budge~ work sessions and he appreciates the Board agreeing to do so. Be stated that the first ~esslon will basically be to indicate to the Board what can be expected in the next three years and will give genera! projections. Be stated the ~econd which is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on October 14, 1981, will deal with growth trends Un the County re~!ectinq generally on the ~ervices by the government. He shared the third fQ~ which a dat~ has yak to be set will combine all the information from the firs~ Mr. Ramsay stated that the projection~ which are mad~ today assuz~%e that the tax rates and =he fee struCtures will remain the same as w~ll a~ the fact t~at growth in services will be limited. He stated that this would be a f~nanciaI foreseer u~ing historical trendS. Mr. Ramsay discussed new positions which are projected for the next three years; the increase of positions which have Occurred from 1976 through the present with projections through 1984~ the ratio of employe~s per thousand population from 197~ through the present time with projections through 1~84~ co,peri,on of revenues and expenditures 1981-8~ through 1984-85; the costs of bonds which were not included in the three year projection (the original 3 year projection included a $25,OQ0,OQ0 GO ~on~ issue and that the actual bond referendum approved by the Board was fo~ $28,850~000 which additional fi.~/res are outlined): comparison o~ revenues and ~xpenditur~ after additional debt $~vic~ ~s a~ded 1981-82 throuqh 1984-S5; the trend in fund balance of the genera] fund; the average asse~d v~ue of umw dwellings; the impact on real estate tax revenue i~ growth projection is limited to !0%7 and the effect on three-year projection fund balance of One-time salary increases for policeman, firemen and :e~chers. 81-453 Mr. Ramsay stated that the projected surplus of $3,Q2~,0G0 is actually $2,500,000 which ie .6% different than anticipated. Ne stated the main factor in this surplus is the State portion of the sales tax based on school ag~ population which wax received by the County which was $600,000 less than anticipated. Mrs. Gixone s~ated the= she felt the industrial expansions and increase in shopping centers would offset the tax revenues. Mr. R~J~sey stated that it did help some but did not affect the overall picture. Mr. Bookman stated that he was oencerned with the increase in budgets which was expected to b~ 40-50% in some departments. Mr. Ramsay stated that inflation o~ ~% compounded wad actually greater than 24% alone. He added that for example in the Fire Separtment budget, the staffing of two n~w stations account for a large part of the i~o~ease. He stated that overall, it is less for each year than has been experienced in th~ past. Mr. Ramsay stated that the general fund portion for the schools does net included state or federal revenues and that anything received would reduce the deficit or increase the surplus. ~rs. Sirens inquired about the ~nnewation funding and revenue sharing. Mr. Ramsay stated that the annexation funds were not tied to any program but was included in the general ruvenue. H= s=atsd further =hat ~ha uncertain future of revenue sharing Gould also affect the financiul picture. Er. Hedrick stated that ~eoause the General Assembly has to approve the annexation funding and The changing of the formula, these f~ndS are not a ~r. Dodd statud that he felt tough decisions would have to be made in ~he next ~hree years. ~e sta~ed that the ffnanoial situation is not improving and people everywhere ar~ finding it harder and harder to ~eet necessary obligations. ~r, Daniel and Mr. Aookman agreed that time~ were bad and they were appreciative that this work session had been scheduled early in the process. ~rs. Girone ~tated that she felt it might be wise to discuss with the bond counsel prior to selling any bonds, about innovative ways of financing. She stated that if the bond iggu~ passes, ~t may not be the best time to sell and she felt the public should be made aware that the County would not proceed if ~his were the Mr. Hedrick stated the purpose of this work session was to show the ~oard the fasts, and that staff would proceed at their direction. Mr. Dodd stated that he would rather pay the existing employees who ere underl~aid more as it would creat~ bett~r morale and in=r~aue productivity. ~. Daniel stated any one time increases that he felt the state and federal programs would also have a major effect on the County. not antitipated or fore~a~ted in these projections. He inquired ~uard was saying and the= ~hey are looking at the administrative levels. ~r. Daniel announced the following during the meeting: Due to the s×tramely dry weather conditions and the low water l~vel of the Ja~es River, the City of Richmond is experiencing algae problem~ The water t~ken from the James River is treated and safe to drink but has an offensive odor and tast~. 81-454 The Chesterfield County Department of'Utiliti~ has contacted the Richmond Utilities Deparbme~ and extended an offer to assist in providing ~ichmond oitizen~ with County water. This offer ha~ been accepted by Richmond add a meeting will be held today by staff from both localities to de%ermine the most ~xp~di~n~ Way to supply this watmr. The i~nediate solution is tO wake water available at ceztain County fire hydrants located near =he Richmond City line. Other methods are being investigated for long-range assistance mho~ld that become necessary. The assistance we provide to the City will be within ~he capabilities ~f our wa=er sysuem and will not adversely a~ect our water customers. ~r. ~edrick stated that in 1970 during the flood the County did provide ~ater to the City and that d~rin9 Other situations, water has been transferred from one jurisdiction to the ocher. He stated good cooperation ~xists. ~rs. Gisone stated that she would like to attend the luncheon with Senator John Warner on October 1~, 1981 between I2:00-2:00 p.m. She suggested all Board members attend and that the regular ge~sion begin at 3:00 p.m. in lieu of 2:00 p.m. On motion of ~r. Dodd, x~conded by ~r~. Girone, the Board went into Executive Session to discuss psrsonn~i matters as permitted by Section 2.1-344 (a) (1} of the Code of Virginia, 19~Q, as amended. Ayes~ Mr. Daniel~ Mr. Dodd~ Mr. Bookman and Mrs. Giron~. Absent: Mr. O'Neill. Reconvening: On mo~iun of ~r. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Soard adjourned at 2~45 p.m. until 10:00 a.m. On OCtober 14~ 1981. Ayeu: ~r. Daniel, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Bookman and ~4r~. Qirone. ~J~seut~ Mr. O'Neill. R/chard L. Hedrick County Administrator Ri-455