Loading...
10-14-81 MinutesB©ABD OF SUPERVISORS MINU~E~ October l~, i~ Supervisors in Attendance: Mr. Harry G. Daniel, Chairman ~r. R. Garland Dodd, vice Chairman ~r. C. L. Bookman Ers. Joan Girone Zr. E. Merlin O'Neill, Sr. ~r. Richard L. Hedrick Staff in Attendance: ~s. Anita ~radshaw, Youth Services ~oordinatOI ~r. Phil Hester, Dir. of Mr. William Howell, Dir. of General Mr. Richard ZcHlfish, Environmental Engineer Mr. Steve Miea~, County Attorney Mr. Jeff Kuzzy, Dir. of Cor~nu~ity D~vetopmant Mr. Glen ~eter~on, CDI Coordinator ~r. Lane Ramsay, D~T. of Budget and Accounting ~r. David Welchons, Asst. Dir. of Utilitis~ ~. ~aniel called th~ meatlng to order at the COurthouse at I0:O0 a.m. IEDST). ~Lr. Hedrick ~tated Lhat the last work session ~ave the ~oard a broad overview cf the thra~ yea~ pr~e~tions. He ~tated this work session would give the Board a broad overview in sppcifics ef growth trends which would have a direct impact on governmental ~ervices. Ha stated the ne~t work session w0ul~ involve specific programs and working with departm~nt~ to prepare the annual plan for 1982-83. Mr. Stan Balderson, Assistant D~ractor cf Community D~velopment, stated that the staff had prepared a r~port indicating growth and devslopment trends in the County and in the nation and how these trends may reflect on County services Drovlded ~n the future. He e~ated they eddreesed ~iv¢ o~ the major service areas which are fire, police, libraries, ~chcols and parks and recreation projected on a conservative 3% growth r~te. ~i~. Dodd joined the meeting. ']iMr~ William ~rnst, Planner for :he County, reviewed trends for population and housing; migration,' household size; annual birth Iratss; age distribution: and per capita income. (A copy of the !iprepared report is ~iled wX~h %he papers of this ~oard meeting.) Mrs. Girone inquired if what was done in the past regarding the services provided, is ~o be considered th~ standard. ~r. Daniel 5tared that staff is presenting the fac~s, and ~hat it will be up to the Board to determine th~ standards which are bo be wh~ther =he services increase, ~ecraasa or are to be maintained at the Current level. Mr. Bookman inquired ~f major roads sewer installatiun were included. Mr. Muzzy ~tat~d that these item~ wer~ not included hut tha~ the $~aff had assumsd that the facilities will be there for qro~vth. ~r. H~drick stated that gtaff did take a conservative ap~roach and some of these concerns w~re factored into the review. Mr. Daniel inquired if there were a ~y~tem available ~o the County in which certain data co,id be entered and needs for ~choolu~ transportation, etc. could be determined a~ to when and whe:e certain faciliti~e might be needed. Mr. Kedrick stated ~hat sta£? was investigating this possibility as to ~he 8].-456 ~easibili~y of such a process. £{r. Daniel requested that additional imformanio~ as to the number of police per number of residents in the County be prepared as the need for additional officers might be n~ceesary wltk the increasing c~imes. Mr. Daniel also sfated that needs for Social Services and other area: had not been addressed, Mr. Zaldereon stated that staff did net rsview all areas, but main!v the five listed. ~r. ~edrick stat~( that the next work s~$sion Qoul~ address individual departments, that this was an attempt to show the Board that the CoUnty was operating on certain levels, the effect of growth on services, that there ~ere pressures to increase/decrease service levels how all Of ~his combined affects County operations. Mr. Daniel thanked the staff for the preparation of the r~port. It was generally aqreed that the ~oard would recess for lunch a~ 11:25 a.m. to attend a Community Leaders Luncheon with Senator John Warner in Richmond, Mr. O'Neill joined th~ Board at lunch. Reconve~iag at ]:00 p.~.: Mr. Daniel made the following statement prior to commencing with the regula~ agenda: "I have called thi~ press COnference fo review Chesterfield's involvement with the I-9~ decisio~ process to date and to announce our future actions. County Involvement To Date~ From 1955 until 1972, the Interstate Plan for Central Virginia included the present Interstate 1-95 Tell Road through Chesterfield County and =he proposed 1-295 Beltway connection between the Toll Road and th~ James River. In October, 1972, the State submitted a proposal to th~ Federal Government requesting a new route for 1-95, located largely to the east of Chest~fleld County. ?he COunty, as a result in 1973, responded by proposing a wester~ route which extended from an 1-295 Beltway connection to I-~5 southwest of Petersburg. In State studies completed ~n June~ 1976, evidence was pr~ented that shewed a western route would save millions of dollar~ in construction oost~, serve regional traffic needs, was located in the growth sector~ Of net only Chesterfield Ccnnty but also the region~ and best ~et the needs of Chesterfield County, the fastest growing major ccK~unitv in cur Stats~ and presented the leaa~ damage to local ~conomi~$ b~cause of relocate4 travel. The Department of Interior objected to %he I=295 Rettway croP,in( of the James River because it crossed Boke-Brady Read which was used ~uring the Civil War. ?~e presented substantial evidenc~ that existing uses c~ the Hots-Brady Road area are far more ~istraoting than a properly ¢ontro!Ied beltway e~ossinq. Our arguments were ignored. In June, 1~78, we requested consideration of the impact on the growth and economy in the region crested by th~ elimination of the ~oke-Brady Road crossing. W~ suggeztad that i~ ~Oke-Brady Road could net be crossed, then the demands of r~glenal growth and through-traffic could be met by a ~ar western route corridor which would include a portion of Route 28~ in the interstate system. Our request~ wer~ once again not thoroughly answered. In January, 1981, Secretary Gold$chmidt approved the Conditional location of sn eastern route for 1-95 which did not include a beltway ¢onnecticn. The ~Vere LoSs cf a western route coupled with the Stake's inability to provide adequate f~ading for roads i~ Chesterfield County, left the ~oard of Supe~ioors with no choice but to pursue a legal review of this matter. 81-457 ~c this end~ in February, 1981, the County hired the firm ~illiams & Conaolly to advise us on our legal position ~elating to the Department of Transporbation'$ approval of an eastern During March, 1981, representatives from Chest~rfieid County met with Senator War~sr, Commissionsr ~arold King and the Secretary of Trensportati0n~ as well as representatives from Richmond who also are objecting to the eastern location for 1-295 and the imposed conditions by th~ Carter Ad/linistraticn. By May, 1981, despite continued e~forts by the County and its lawysrs to persuade the Department of Transportation and VDH~T that the traffic projections and costs failed to justify an eastern location for I-~9~ an eastern location for 1-295 was approved with serte~n ckanges to th= conditions impo~d by the )revioum secretary of TransPortation. Lawyers ~or the County filed objections to the decision baeed on erroneous traffic projection~ a~d excessive costs. Thi~ July, the final environmental impact statement was issued by the Department of Transportation approving an eastern location for 1-29~ with nc changes in the ~isputed traific projections. O~r lawyers filed objections to the environmental impact statement with the Department of Transportation. Future Actions: In summary, we have been completely frustrated by the administrative review process on thi~ Study. N~merolls deficiencies have been identified in this study which do not comply with ~onnd planning p~inciples or federal law. Thersfore, the Board of Supervisors has no choice b~t to seek a interests of resid~nt~ of Chesterfield County. Today, the Board will take action to re,est the law fi~ of Williams & Ccnn¢llv to file an action in Federal Court to obtain a judicial review~of the 1-95 study. ~hcuId be reconsidered on the hasps of updated information, and Chesterfield County, the Commonwealth of Virginia or ~he nation." ~r. Daniel stated %hat e£f~cial action would be taken later. gave the invocation. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by W~r. Bookman, the Boar8 hereby r'equests the law firm of Williams & Ccnnollv to fils suit in Federal Court to 'enjoin the construction cf-an eastern location for ~he 1-295 connector. Mr, Dodd stated he was disa~p0int~d that th~ County should have to initiate such action b~t it is one that the County must take even though it will be expensive. He stated that he hoped ether avenues might ~e opened to the County and he would certainly consider any, but thi~ in au issue which is vital to Che~ter~isld. Mr. Bookman stated that he hoped a solution might come from law suit. He stated that the stats is proposing to ~pend in exosss of $100,0Q~00 mors for the eastern route wkil~ the western route would be a shorter distanc~ and would finance 6-7 mites of Route 288 which would serve ~ome of Chastsrfield's needs. Ee state~ this eastern route does not address the County needs and i~ not best for the entire metro901itan area, Be stated there are certain facts furnished by the attorneys that' give credibility tO going forward with this 5ult. He stated that he hoped this would receive ~ome attention'as the State ha~ been deaf to the County's position. He stated he felt the County had no choice but to proceed in this manner. He added that a quote from Commissioner Harold King indicated that the objection to the Hoke-Brady Crossing was not a major problem and yet others have sba%ed that it is. Mr. Daniel stated that he fel~ this was an arbitrary bureaucratic d~cision particularly regarding the Hok~-Brady Crossing which has lead to e monstrosity of a road project. He stated that this project docs not address but by-passes the needs of Richmond, Henrice, Chesterfield, Petersburg, etc. He ~ated ~ha% ~his will no~ improve the economic conditions Or the expedient ~ovement of traffic in any of the jurisdictions. ~e stated that this movement o~ the eastern ro~te is not to be confused with other highway plans to solve the County problems. He added that reconsideration is being given t~ the road problem in Northern Virginia and he felt thi~ ~ituatien should be given the same consideration. Mrs. Girone inquired what the anficipate~ Cost would be for this action. Mr. Micas stated that tho initial action would co~f approximately ~SO,OOg and that there was no wav tQ estimate the total cost at this time. He indicated $308~00 had been budgeted for ac=ion regardinq this mutt~r. ~r. O'Neill stated he felt this action would draw attention statewide. ~e stated that he felt it inDortant to indicate that last month fh~ State did not have enough-matching fund~ in order tO obtain femoral funds and this should be taken into Consideration. There being ~O further discussion, the veto was as follow~ ~yes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Dodd, Fr~. Bookman and Mr. ~ays~ Mrs. Girone. Dn motion o~ Mrs. circle, seconded by Mr, Bookman, the Board ~men~ed the ~inut=s of August 12, 1981, at the request of the ~ond attorneys~ r~tating to th~ November ~cheol Bond Referendum ~s follows which changes the date from th~ "~lst" to the "29th" tn Section 1 and Changes the word "minimum" to "maximum" in ~ection 2 as follows: 'On motion of ~. Dodd, s~cen~ed by Mrs. Girone, be it resolved )y the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia: !1. The County school Board of Cheseerfi~ld County, Virqinia, on the 29th day of July, I98I, adopted the at,ached resolution, requesting this Beard ef Sup-rvisors to adapt an initial resolution requesting the Judges of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County to order an election upon the question of the Coun~ of Chesterfield COntracting a debt in the a~eunt of Tw~nty-$1x Million ~ollars ($26,0Q0~000} and issuing general obligation bonds o~ the County of Chesterfield in s~ch amount to finance projects for school purposes as set forth in such amount to finance projects for school purposes as set ~arth in ~eh resolution. It is hereby determined that it is necessary and advisable to Contract a debt on the credit cf the County of Chesterfield to the ma~im~m amount of $26,000~000 for capital school ~mprovemenb purposes, acquisition of futur~ ~ohool sites; and such other school construction es may be required by the actual sducational needs in Chesterfield County, Virginia, and to issue general obligation bonds of the County of Chesterfield in She maximum ~ount of $26,000,000 ~o finance such projects p~rsuant to Chapter 5, Article 3, Title I5.I of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, which sai~ bonds shall bear interest at the rats not to exceed the maximum rate of interest as may be 21-459 permitted by law at the time the bond~ are sold shall mature in such annual or semi-annual installhents, as may hereafte be determined by resolution of this Boar~, the last installment of which shall be ~aya~le not more than thirty years from ~he date o~ such bonds, and said bonds may be made redeemable before maturity, at the option cf this Board, s~ch prle~ or prises and under ~ch ~rms and conditions as may ~e fixe~ by this Board p~ior to the issuance of the bonds. A tax ~ufflciant to pay the principal and int~r~st of said bonds as the same mature ~hall be levied upon all of the property s~bject to ta~ati, A certified copy of this initial resolution shall ~e presented by the Clerk o~ this Board to the Judges Qf the Circuit Court of Chesterfield COunty and %ks Judge~ of said Court are hereby requested tQ enter an order requiring the Judges of Election to Open a poll on November 3~ 1981, and take ~he sense of the ~ualified voters of the County of Chesterfield on the question of COntracting a debt in the ~mount of $26,000,000 and issuing gate,at obligation bonds Of the County of Chesterfield in such amount for the purpose set £crth in Paragraph 2 of this resolutlcn. ~. This resolution shall t~ke effect immediately. 5. The foregoing resolution was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Mr. Dedd, Mr. Bookman, Mrs. Girone and Mr. O'Neill. Abstention~ Mr. Daniel b~cause he believes there is no capitalization plan." On motion of ~ir. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board approved the minutes of September ~3 and October 6~ I981, as amended. Vot~ Unanimous Mr. H~drick introduced Reverend Clarence Jackson, Vice Chairman e~ the Youth Services Co--lesion. Reverend Jackson stated that he was present in lieu of Mrs. Merge Simpers, Chairman, as she wa~ ill. He stated that he apprmciated the Board'u support in workinq with the Youth Servit~s Commission, ~e state~ that it was his pleasure to introduce Ms. Anita Bradshaw, recently employed Youth Services Coordinator, and he brle~ly outlined her qualifications ~or the posifion. MS. Bradshaw st~te~ ~hat she was plea~ed and excited to be working with the young people of the County. ~r. Daniel uxcussd himself from the meeting. ~r. Medrick stated that the Manchester Rescue Squad recently held a successful carnival for the benefit of their organization. ~e stated that the Porest View Rescue Squad had recently held an open housu for their recently constructe~ $90,000 building. Mrs. Girone stat=d that all appreciated the efforts of the rescue squads in th~ community. Mr. ~cokman stated that he was impressed with the Cooperative efforts made by each of hhe Squads with ~ach Other. He stated a good relationship exists and this i$ indicative of the outstanding volunteers who ~a~ticipate. Mr. Hedrick stated that on 0etcher ~3, 1981, representatives of Chesterfield, Hanover, Senrico and Richmond kicked off the the Richmond Area E~cutour. ~e Stated the turnout was very successful and that he had received favorable comments regardinq the County and its development from the firms looking at areas in: which to locate and/or relocate. 81-460 Mr. Eedrick stated that as o£ tko end of the current week, landtill operaticn~ will cease at the Chester Landfill as it will De full to capacity. Ee stated that r~fus~ will have Go be carried to tko new Northern Area Landfill after that date+ He stated that staff is investigating cth~r alternatives for the Chester Landfill at this time. Mr. Daniel returned to the meeting. 81~RI40 In ~ermuda Magisterial District, Bobby J. Martindal~ requesta~ renewal of a Mobile Hom~ Permit to park a mobile home on property which he owns. Tax Map 115-6 (1} parcel 31 and batter known as 4641 Ecoff Avenue (Sheet 32). Mrs. Ruby Martindals, mother of the applicant, was present representing Mr. Martindale. Mr. Dodd inquired if 60 days would be adequate for Mr. Mart~nda!e to construct his home. Mrs. Martindale stated he felt 90 days would ~e better in case of complications. Mr. Dodd inquired when the actual permit expired. Mr. Balder~oa stated it exulted several months a~o. Mr. Hedrick stated the case was being heard because staff was aware of its expiration and brought it to the attention of the applicant. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Kr. Bookman, the Board approved the request for a mobile home permit for a period of 90 days from this date of approval, subject tO the roi!owing standard conditions; I. The applicant m~mt b~ th~ owner and occupant of the mobile home. No lo~ or parcel may be rented or ]eased for uss as a mobile home site, nor shall any mobile home be used for rental property. 0nly one (1) mobile home will be permitted to be parked on an individual lot or parcel. 3. The minimum lot size, ~ard setbacks, required front yard, and other zoning recuiremen%s of the applicable zoning distric: shall be oemplied with, axe,pt that no mobile home zhall be located oloser than 20 feet fro~ any existing reeidence. 4. NO additional permanent-type living space may be added onto a mobile hume. Ai~ mobile homes shall be akirt,d but shall not b~'placed on a permanent foundation, Personal gouda an6 articles shall net be stored underneath the mobile hume. Where public (Ce~nty) water and/or sewer are available, the shall be used. Opon being granted a permit for a mobile home, =he applica~ must then obtain the necessary Delimit from the Building Inspector'~s Office. This must h% don~ prior ~o ~he installation or relocation of the unit. Any violation of ~he above conditions shall b~ grounds for revocation of a Mobile ~ome Permit/Special Exception for a mobile hume. Vote~ Unanimous ~r, Hedrick stated thi~ date and time had been scheduled to consider an ordinance relating tu subdivision fe~s, aching Eees and site plan fees. He s~ated staff had no further co~u~entm to make regarding this matter. There was ne one pr~sentin the audience to address this m~tter. Mr. Daniel stated that after calculatinq this increase, it amounted to approximately $4.50 Der building lot. He stated that the County Administrator had been instructed to r~val~ate the fees annually to t~at dramatic 81-461 changa~ would not have to be made all at one ti~ but a= Mr. Hsdrick stated chat ~taff will also in~olv~ representatives of th~ con~nunity when this is considered. Messrs. Sam KOrnblau and Bob Schrum were present in the aUdienCe. On notion of Mr~ DO~, seconded by ~. Boak~an, the followin~ or~nance was adopted with the under~bandln9 that half of the fee increase be £mposed a£~ective January 1, 1982 with tko second halt imposed April I, 1982: An ozdinance to Amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978~ as amended, by Am~ndin9 Section~ 1@-11~ 21-9 and 21-77 R~latlng to Su~divisiPn Fees, Zoning Fees end Site Plan Fea~ 2. That Section 18-ll of the Code of the COunty of Chesterfield is a~ndcd and reenacted as followm: Sec. 18-!1. Fees The fees for pro~e~inq subdivisions by th~ county payabl~ upon submission of the plats to the countT for tentative or final approval and shall b~ equ~l to the followinq: (a) ~or tentative approval .... $25.00 plue $2.00 (b) Final appzoval .......... $25~00 plus $2.$0 per Ich 3. That Section 21-9 of the Coda of the County of Chesterfield is amended end reenacted as follows: ~eo. 21-~. Fee~ fo~ hearings. The cost of each hearinq re,neEded pursuant to the r~vision~ of this chapter, including advertisement when required, shall be a~ ~ollows and shell be dcpooited simultaneously wi~h ~he filing of th~ applioatlon or petition: Zoninp: Agricultural IA) (2) Residential R-15, R-12~ R-~, .... $150.00 plus $5.00 per acre R-25, R-7). . $150.00 plu~ $5.0~ per aero · (R-TH, ~-1 MH-2) ..... $400.00 plug $5.00 per acre (3) Con~rcial ....... $300.00 plus $20.0~ pe~ (4} Industrial ........ $3~0.00 plus $20.00 p~z Conditional uses and special exceptions: (I) ~ultiple ~amily or two family . . ~30O.O0 plus $7.00 per unit for each unit after the units (2) Mobile Memos ........ $125.00 (3) Planned Development .... (4) Ail othex ......... Yariauces ............. $150.00 4. That Section 21-77 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield is amended and reenacted as follows~ Sec. 21-77. Fees. In addition to any other fae~ required by the county (state and County agencies and departments and tax eMempt non-profit organizations excluded), a fee of twenty-five dollars shall be p~id to the county treasurer upon filing of a site plan, plus: One dollar per ~welling unit; or (b) Five dollars per acrs for all new corm~eroial sitem~ or Five dollars per ~cre for all new industrial site~; or rd) Fiv~ dollars per acre for all new institutional {e} Seventy-five dollars for ma$~er site plans. 5. That one-half o~ the increase o~ such fees f~om existinc levels to th~ approved new limits shall be effeotlve on January 1~ 1982 and that the full increase shall be effective April 1, 1982. Vote: Unanimous Mr. ~ornbleu expressed appreciation to the ~oard for the action t~ke~. On mo~iun of ~Lr. Bookmae~ seconded by Mr. O'Neill, the Board adopted the following ordinance on an emergency basis and set date of November 25, 1981 at 9~00 a.m. ~or the public hearing: An Ordinance to Amend and Reenact Section 8-32 of the Code cf th~ COunty of Chesterfield, 1978, a~ Amended, Relating to Co,ts in Civil Actions Be It Ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (tl That Section 8-32 of the Code of the County of Chasterfield is amended and reenacted as fellows: Sec. ~-3~. Imposed: amount; colleotien; aDplication to .or stats ~ov~rnment. (a} Pursuant to Chaptsr 4 of Title 42.1 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, the county does hereby assess as part of the costs incident to each civil action filed in the distr~ct court of the county %he Sum of One dollar, and circuit court of %he co~ty~ th~ $~m of two dollars. Vote: Unanimous on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. O'Neill, the Board adopted the following resolution: Whereas, Section 53-128.19 o~ the Code e{ Virginia requires that each County and City participating in a ce,annuity ~ivsrsion 81-463 7.C,2, project shell be represented on s C~m~unity Corre¢tions Resources Board~ and Whereas, Such appointments were made by this Board at a rsgular meeting on Septer~er 2~ 19~0. Be It Further Resolved that the Community Corzactlons Resources Board ix empowered to conduct or purchase diagnostic evaluatiens and make receu~uendations regarding diversion based on written plan to the Twelfth Circuit Court Judge(s) of this county. On motion of Mr. ~ookman, seconded by Mr. 0'~eill~ the Beagd: Authorized the acceptance of the Federal Aid Grant funds of I l. $~,~95 for library equipmen~ andI 2. Authorized the acceptance of the State Grant funds of $17,371I for the Mental Health/~e~tal Retardation Rein~ursament [ Officer position. OD motion of ~r. Bookman, seconded by Mr. O'neill, the Board mede the following changes to th~ School bu~ge~ by: 1. Increasing Plannad Budget Revenue and ~xpenditure accounts by $4~000 for th~ Title IVc Adopter Grant. 2. In~reasing Planfled Budget Expenditur~ and ~evenue account~ by $46,9~0 for the Social skills Cnntdnu~ti0n Grant, 3. Increasing Planned ~udget ~xDenditure and Ravenna aCCOunts by $26,607 for the additional funding for Head,tart program. Decreasing ~lanned Budqet Expenditure and ~ev~nue accounts b $9~189 for the reduction in fmnding for Headstart-Handicapped prcqram. Ye%e: Unanimous On me,ion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. O'Neill, the Board: 1, Tranmfe=red $I3,700 from the General Fund Contingency account to Buildings and Grounds for re~edellng expenses for the Judgss of General District Court~ and 2. Transferred $5~00 from the General Fund Contingency Account to the Circuit Court for furnishing Judqes~ offices and chanfoeru~ and appropriated $7,5~0 to the General Di~=rict court for furnishing Judges' offices and cha~er~ from the General Fund Contingency account. On motion of Mr. Boo,an, seconded by bi/'. O'Neill, =he Board authorized the County Treasursr to establish two putty cash fund~ in the amount of $~0.00 each for the Chsstsr Landfill and th~ Northern Area Bandfill with Don Nuttalt as the custodian of both On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by ~r. O~Neill, the Board !authorized the County Treasurer to c~nsolidate the two petty cash funds for the A~ult Training Center and %ha Occupational Center each in the amount of $100.00 in the name o~ Delores M~rri~ into one account in the amount of $2~0,00 in the name of Chesterfield Vocational Services wi~h Delores Morris as the custodian. Vote: Unanimou$ On Motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. 0+~eill, the Board approved and authorized the County Administrator to s×ecute any necessary documents for D. M. Lyle Corporation who submitted t~e only bid in the amount of $6,500 for furnishing and setting 14 piles for a 32 foot long T-shaped fishing pier at Point of Rock~ Park, funding for which is provided by a grant fro~ the CommissiOn of Outdoor Recreation. Vote: Unanimous This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordsnce with directions from this Board, made report in writinu upon his !examination of Lancashire Drive, Oak Wat~r Road, ~ak Water Cour= and Lak~forsst Drive i~ Surrey~ocd, Section G, ClOver Hill District. Upon con~ideratiom whereof, and on motion of Mr. Bookman, se¢ondsd by Mr. O'Neill, it is resolved that Lancashire Drive, Oak Water Road, Oak Water Court and Lake~ere~t Drive in Surreywood, section G, Clover Hill District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it ~urther resolved, that the Virginia Department of Highways amd Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary Symtam, LanCashire Drive, ~eginni~g where Stat~ maintenance ends on existinq Lancashire Driv%, State Route 2620, extending southwest O.Q4 mile to ~he intersection of Oak Water Road, th~n southwest 8.~4 mile tc the intersection of Lakeforest Drive, than southwem% 0.17 mile tua cul-de-sac; Oak I%~ater Read, beginning at its intersection with Lancashire Drive, extending southeast 0.07 mile to the in~erse~tlon of Oak Water Court: Oak Water Court, beqinning at its intersection with Oak Water Dries, extending nor=h 0.0~ mile to a cul-de-sac; Lakefcreet Drive, beginning ut its intersection with Lancashire Drive, ~×ten4ing westerly 0.29 mile to a cul-de-sac. Thsse read~ serve 62 lots. And be it further re,elveS, ~hat the Board of guarantees to the Virginia Department of ~ighway~ a right-of-way for all of =hess roads. This section of Surreywood is recorded as foltowe: Section G, Plat Book 30, ~ges 75 and 76, This day the County Envi~OnmentaI Engineer, in accordance with directions from this ~oard, made report in writinq upon his examination of Bridgswood Road, Fort Sumter ROad, Port Sumter Court, Dshaviland Drive and Twelveoaks Road in Glen Tara, Section 1, Clev~r ~i~l District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Bookman, seGonded by ~r. O'Neill, it is resolved that Bridgeweod Rcad~ Port ~umter ~oad, Fort Su~ter Court, Dehaviland Drive and Twulveouku Road in Glen Tara, Section 1, clover ~ill District, b~ and they hereby ar~ establi~he~ as public roads. And be it further re~olved, that the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation, be an~ it hereby is reque~te~ to take into the Secondary System, Brid~ewoed ~oad, beginning where ~tate maintenance ehd$ on existing Bridgewood Road, Stats ~euto 907, extending south 0.1~ mile tO the inter,action of Fort Sumter Road, then continues south 0.0S mile to the intersection of 81-465 Dehaviland Drive, then centinues southeast 0.2~ mil~ to th~ inter~ection of Twelveoaks ~oad; Fort Su~er Road, beginning at its intersection with Bridgewood Road, a×ten~in~ so~%hwemt 0.06 mile te the intersection of Fort Sumter Court~ Fort Sumter Court beginning at its intersection wi~h For~ Sumter Road, a×tending southeast Q.0~ mile to a cul-de-sac and e~tendi~g northwest 0.04 mile to a col-de-mac; Dehaviland Drive, beqinnin~ at iC~ intersection with Brid~ewO~d Road, sxt~ndlnq ~a~t 0.04 mile to tie into proposed Dehaviland Drive, Glen Tara, Section 2; Twei~eoaks Road, beginning at its i~tersection wi~k Br~dgewood Road, extending southwest 0.38 mile to a temporary turnaround~ These roads serve 91 1QTS. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors ~pAarantees to the Virginia Department of ~ighways a 50 ft. right-of-way ~nr all Of these road~. This section of ~lmn Tara i~ recorded as follows: Section i, ~lmt Book 31, Pages ~8, ~9 an~ 70, 7/24/78. Vote; Unanimous This day the COunty Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board~ ~ade report in writing ~pon his examination of ~arma Road, Kralan Drive and Kralan Court in Lakew~od Farm~ Bections C and D, Bermuda District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion Qf ~r. Bookman, se¢ondad by Mr. O'Neill, ~t is resolved that Karma Road, ~ralan ~rive and Kralan Court in Lakewood Farms, Sections C and D, Bermuda Dfmtrict, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be i~ further :esolvad, that the Virginia Department o~ 5ighways and Transportation, be and it hereby is requested t0 take into the Secondary System, Karma ROad~ beginning at the intersectien with Ivt-~ood Road, State ROute 1657, and runninq easterly .Q$ ~ile to the intersection with ~ralan Drive, then contlnuinq easterly .14 mile to end in a temporary turnaround; Kralan Drive, beginninq mt the intersec%io~ with Karma Read and r~nDing southerly .07 mile to the int~rmeotion with Eralan Court then continuing southerly ~07 mile to the intersectio~ with Emalan Court, then oontinuinq southerly .07 mile to the intersection with Blfinwoed Road, State Route 1592; Kralan Court beginning at the intersection wi%h Krmtan Dr~ve and running moutherly .10 mile to en~ in a cul-de-sac. Thes~ roads serve 26 lots. A~d be it further resolved, that the Beard of S~pervi~o~s g~arantaas to the Virginia Dmpartment of Highways a 50 ft. right-of-way for ali of these roads. These sections Of Lakewood Farms ar~ recorded as follows: Section C, Plat Book 24, Page 36, June 19, i975 Section D, Plat Book 29~ Page 52, Saptember 9, i~77. Vote: Unanimous This ~ay the County Environmental Enqineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his exa~inatlen c~ Glen~ont Road, Bondurant Drive amd Durrington Drive in Ashley Wood, ~eotion C, Midlcthian District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Bookm~n~ se0on~ed by Mir. O'Neill, it is resolve~ %hat Glenment Road, Bondurant Drive and Durrington Drive in Ashley ~Iood, ~ection C, Midlobhian District, he and they hereby are emtablished a~ public roads. And he it further rm~ol~ed, that the Virginia Departmen~ cf Highwaym ~nd Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to 81-466 take into the Secondary System, GlenmGnt Road, beginning wh~ state Maintenance ends, Sta~e Route 2784, 'end ~olng .12 mile northeasterly to intersection with Bondurant Drive~ Bood~rant Drive, b~ginning at intersection with Gienmont Read and going . milo westerly to inter~ection with Purring%on Qrivo, then eonfinues .09 milo westerly to tie into eximting Bondurant Driv, State Route 2567; Durrington Drive, beginning at intersection with Bondurant D~ivo and going .06 mile northoasterly to a cul-de-sac+ These roads serve 20 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Super~isor~ guarantees to the Virginia Department Qf Highways a 50 St. right-cf-way for all of these road~ except Bondurant ~rive which has a 60 ft. right-of-way. This section of Ashley Wood is recorded as follows: Section C, Plat Book 33~ Page 26, February 1~, 1979. Vote: Unan±mou~ This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from thi~ Board, made report in writing uDon his examination o~ Old Country Lane, Ashtree Road, Old C0~ntry Terrace, Old Coun:ry Court and Overcliff Court in Walton ~ark, Section E, Midlothian District, Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Bookme~ seconded Dy Mr. O'Neill, it is resolved that Old Country Lane, Ashtree Road, Old Country Terrace, Old Country COurt and Overcli~f Court in Walton Park, Section ~, ~idl0thian ~istrict, b~ add ~hey hereby are established as p~blic roads. A~d be it further resolved, that tho Virginia Department O£ Highways and Transportation, ~e and it hereby is requested to take into tho Secondary System, Old Country ~ano, beginning at its intersection with Walton Pa~k ~oad, State ROute 624, and ~sing .05 mile easterly to intersection with Ashtroa Road, then continues .07 mile easterly to intersection with Old Country Court and Old Country Terrace, then eon%inue~ .08 mile easterly to a temporary turnaround; Ashtree Road, b~inning at intersection with Old Country_ Lane and going .04 mile to a dead end: Old Country ~errace, beginning at intersection with Ol~ CO~try Lane and going ,OS mile northerly to a cul-de-sac; 01d Country Court, beginning at intersectioD with Old Country Lane and going .0~ milo southerly tO a cul-de-sac; O~ercliff Court, beginning at inte~ecticn with Walton Pa~k ~ca~, Stats Route 624, and going .12 mile southerly to a cul-de-sac, These roads sarv~ 43 lots. A~d b~ i~ f~r%h~r resolved, that th~ Board of S~pervisors ~uarantees to the Virginia Depar~ent cf ~ighways a 50 ft. ri~hh-0f-way for all of the~e roads except Old Country Terrace and Old Country Court which have a 40 it. right-of-way. This section o~ Walton Park is recorded as follows: Section E, Plat Book 34, Page 8, June 28, 1979, Vote: Unanimous This day the County ~nvirsrk~e~tal Engineer, in ~c¢~rdanoe with directions fro~ this Board, mado report in writing upon his examination of Cherylann Road in a portion of Reatkerid~e, Section l, Clover Rill District. Upon consideration whereof, and ~n motion of ~r~ Bookman, seconded by ~r. O'Neill, ±tfs rescLve~ that Chervlann Road in a )ortion of 5eabheridge, Section l; Clover Hill Di~tric~, bo an~ ~t hereby is established al a public road. And be it further resolvod~ that the Virignia Department ~f Eighways and Transportation, be and it hereby is regue~d ~o 81-467 it~ e ~Oad, Prate Route 1454, a~d Cherylanr Road, Stats Route 1456, extending we~t D.%% mile to ti~ into existing Cherylann Road, State Route 145~. This road ~orvea as through street. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department O~ ~i~hwsya a ~0 ft~ right-of-way for this road. This ~ection cf Reatheridgs is r~corded a~ follow~: Section 1, Plat Book ~4, Pages 41 and ~2, 10/23/79. This day the County ~nvironm~ntal Englneer~ in acoordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing apda his examination o~ MarDle~horpe Reed, Qneensway Road and Pulibrooke Drive in Briarctiff, Section 4, Clover ~ill District. Upon consideratio~ whereof, &~d on motion of Mr. Book, an, seconded by ~r. O'Neill, i~ is re~olved Shat Marblethorpe Road, Qnesnsway Road and ~ullbrooke Drive in Briarcliff, Section 4, C%ove~ Bill District~ be and they h~reby are established a~ public roads. And be i~ further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to hak~ in~o ~ke Secondary Sys~em~ Marbl~thorpe Road, beginnin~ where State maintenance ends on existing Marblethorpe Road, Sta~ Route 154g, a×tendinq ~outh O.O3 mile to %he intersection of Queen,way Road, then south 0.08 mile to %he infersection of Pnllbrooke Driver then southeast 0.04 mils to a temporary turnaround? Queensway Road, beginning at its intersection with Marblathorpe Road, extending west 0.0~ mile to tho intersection of Ma:bieridge Road, State ROute 1825, and QBeensway Roa~, Stets Route uur~be~ unassigned~ P~lIbrooke'Drive~ beginning at its intersection wi~h Marblethorpe Road exfending northeast 0.I2 mil to & temporary turnaround. ~he~e roads serve 42 lots. An~ be it further resolved~ that th~ Board Of Supe~vlsors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Highways a 50 ft. right-of-way for all of the~e roads. Thi~ section of Briarcliff is recorded a~ follows: Section 4, ?let Book 36, Pa~e 87, g/25/S0 a~prove~ t~a rsquest for & bingo/raffle permig for :he Midlothia~ ~Lgh School Athl~tio Roosters Association for calendar year 1981[ Mr. Hedrick advimed :he Boar~ of outstandin~ appointments. On motion of Mrs. ~irone, me,ended by ~r. BookIRanf th~ Board approved the installation of Street lights at the fei%owing locations with funds to be expended from the Street Light Funds: l~ Intersection o£ Robious Road and Cranbeck; and 2. Int~rseotion cf Mug~enot Road and Cranbeck~ and further ~hs Board approved the County aesu~ing th~ monthly costs for a street light on Stiqall Road with any associated costs t¢ be expended from the Street Light Funds. 81-46¢ On motion of ~L~. Dodd, Seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board 5pproved and authorized tko County Administrator to ~n~er into a contract with the firm of J. M. Martin and Sons who submitted tk low bid in the amount of $$9,299.25 for the construction of the Wood Dale Drainage Pro~eet with funds to b~ expended f~om the Capikal Improvements AccoUnt for the Wood Dale Drainage Project. Dn motion Of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Ro~r~ approve and authorized the County Administrator to enter into a contract with Stamie B. ~yttle who ~ubmitted the low bid of $73,572.70 fo the constr~ction of Whitsbark ~srrace and further the ~oard appropriated $75,000 from 330-1-92300-4393, Airpcrt/Industr±al Park~ COnstruction. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Bockman~ the Board approved the new street name of Osterbind Lane, which i9 a dirt ~oad located off Of Salem Church Road, and subsequent house number changes 'which were requested by the area resid~ntm. Vote; Unanimous Mr. 0'Nei]l inquired about improvements in the Eampton Street/River Roa~ area. ~r. McElfi~h stated, hopefully, revised planm would be available by Nove~ber 10-15, 1981 and then they would begin obtaining ~he necessary right-of-way easements. on motion of Mr. DodO, seconded ~y Mr. O'Neill, the Board appruved a r~quest for s bingo/raffle permit from the Grace Luthecan Wcm~n'$ Guild for calendar year 1981. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dodd, at the request cf staff, th~ ~oard deferred Consideration of the engineering study for the TndusSrial Park Taxiway until November ~5, 1981. Vote: Unanimous On motion of ~r. Book, an, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approved and authorized the County Actminlutrater to execut~ any necessary documents for Bremner, Youngbloud and King who sub~/tted the low bid in the amount of $7,000 for the design ~or Courthouse Road ~xtended and $1,000 for the necessary easement plats pending contract ~igning hy October 21~ 1981 with $8,000 appropriated from the General Pund Contingency for this project. Mr. Daniel mtatsd this approval is not to be considered a vote for the construction project but for th~ design work. Mr. MUrky ~tated the Virginia Department of Highways end Transportation ie pursing withdrawal of th~ 1-95/I-85 COnn~ctor south of Petersburg in order to apply it~ approximat~ =cst ef $55,000,000 to other transportation projeot~. ~e ~t~ted that th~ F~deral regulations require that the Tri-Cities ~PO approve any substitution project~ in conjunction with the Gev,mcr if th~ substitution is ~o be approved by th~ f~d~ral government. He ~tated thab the Tri-Citiss POlicy Committee ha~ requested thaC 81-469 the Technical Co~ittee prepare an 1-95 substitution list a5 a~ possible. He stated the County ne~ds to establish its priority in order that staff can represent the County in these discussions. Ne stated that it was staff's recommendation that Hedri~k stated that this is not acquiescence on the part of the Beerd that Route 288 ba built but that the eQnneotor would not be a project, Mr. O'Neill stated that this project was initlat~d by the Highway Commissioner and that there seem to he problems south of Chesterfield an~ that this was not initiated by the County. Mrs. Girone stated that she felt the Board should indicate that the projects will be Temple Avenue, S~uth Crater Ro~d and Route 2~8 as these funds will be shared. Mr. O~Neilt stated that he did not feel this Board ShOuld address the priorities for Pri~o~ George nor Dinwiddie as he was not ~ure what they were. Mrs. Girone stated that she had been involved in discussions and it was her understanding these were the desired priorities. Mr. O'Neill stated the resolution could be worded in such fashion tha~ indicated we wer~ listing our priority which weuld be shared with the priorit£$$ of the other jurisdictions ~hould any funds Become available to the County. Mr. Dodd stated any raeolutio~ of the County should address only the priority which is our major conoarn and if we receiv~ any funds that they be used on Route ZS~. M_r. O'Neill s~ated it is not the County's intention that we try to obtain ali the funds. Mrs. Gir0ne stated that we are not assured that w~ will receive any of the funds but that the two p~0jects for the other jurisdictions should also be listed. After further discussion it was on motion of Mr, O'Neill, seconded by Mr~ Dodd~ ~e$olved that if any funds become available from the 1-95/I-85 Connector project for which the County have a vote, that Cheeterfield's representative on tho Technical Committee be instructed that ~uoh funds as may be available to Chesterfield County be use~ for Route 258. Ayes: Mr. Daniel, ~. Dodd, Mr. Bookman and Mr. O'Neill. Nays: Mrs. Girona because she felt Chesterfield should recommend that the funds bs shared on the Temple AVenue and South Crater Road projectm as well as Route 25~ as they benefit the region and %he County. Mr. Daniel stated that the Board intends to work with the other jurisdictions and that this is not a vote against their projects, it jUSt lists the one that Chesterfield is interes~nd ~n. He stated further that the f~nd8 should be properly shared and they can ehoe~a any method or projects which they feel proper. M~. O'Neill stated he did not knew what the other projects were for the other jurisdictions and felt ~he Board should not be pr=sumptuous and name the ones the County supported for the other areas. ~r. Bookman and ~. Daniel sugge~te~ that a phrase or additional wordinq be added in the resolution which pledged County's supsort to the projects ~elected by the MPC a~ it was ~elt that a unanimous vote would be m0rs effective. After further disuussion~ the Board proceeded with the next item on the approved and authorized the staff to proceed with consultant survey and right-of-way acquisition on the ~emaining section of the Sea~oard Coastline Railroad right-of-way from Chester Road to Branders Bridg~ Road which land acquisition is $7,500 and authorized 81,750 for right-of~way manpower end recordation [ae~ ail of which $3,965 is to ba taken from the right-of-way account and $4,282 is to be taken from the General Fund contingency. ~r. O'Neill inedited i~ Colonial Heights were given the r~ght-of-way in their area. ~r. Mu¥~y stated he thought it was als0 purchased, 81-470 iO.A. 1. On ~otio~ of Mr. O'neill, seconded b~ Mr. Bookman, the Board approved tko continuation of th~ w~d removal program and authorized ~he County Administrator to execute any nmcessar¥ documents to renew the current contract with Mr. Doug cole ~or another year. It is noted that funding for this project was budgeted previGuslv. Vote; Unanimous On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. O'Neill, the Board dsferred consideration of s@tting a public hearing date to consider restrloting truck traffic on osborne Road until October 28, 1981. Vote: Unanimous On motion of Mr. Daniel~ seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board a~proved the request from the d~velapers of Court Hou~ CO.mens to construct and operate a private sewage pumping oration and forge main to serve the development subject to an agreement, acceptable to th~ County Attorney, b~ing recorded covering the operation and maintenance of the facility and subject to th~ County reserving the right to discontin~ water service to the development if the station is not operated properly. And further that the developers agree to abandon the sewage pump station and connect to public sewer when available. Vote: ~nanimous On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, =he ~oard approved and au=horlzed the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents for the following sewer contract: S81-47CD/718)1472 - Chippenh~m Square Shopping Center Route 60~ On-sit~ and o~f-site $~wers Developer: Jamestown Properties, Ltd. Contractor: Richard L. Crowder Construction, !nc. Total Contract Comt: $89,~g0.50 Estimated County Cost: $21,228.~4 - Refund tk~ough connections for off-cite sewers servioe laterals Code~ 574-i-11781-7221 on motion o~ ~r. ~oekman, ~econded by Mrs. ~irone, the Beard approved the request from ~xxon ~e construct an~ operate a private sewage pumping station and force main for a proposed ~xxon Station at Route ~60 and Gmnito Road subjeot to the following conditions: Ail necessary easements on ~xon property for future gravit ~ewer be dedicated. The O~ner agrees to connect to the gravity system when available. The County reserves the right to diucontinu~ water to the property if the pumping facility is nat operat~ properly. Mr. Bookman requested that th~ owners of the Bi-Rite he contacts regarding =heir interest in the project but that it not be delayed_ . 81-471 1C'.A.6. .~O.A,7. iO.B.1. On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Nfs. Girone, the Board approved and aukho~ize~ the County AdministraSor to execute any necessary doommente for the following sewer contract~ Sgl-89CD/7(8)1892r Solar IT, Section C Developer: ~ethany Ridge Limited Partnership Contractor: R.M.C. COntractors, Inc. To,el Contraot Cost: $65,032.50 Estimated County Cost~ $ ~,241.00 - Cash refund ~or evermized Cods: 3~-1-71~92-721~ and further the Board app=epriate~ $$~241.00 from 574 Surplus to 380-1~71g~2-7212 for caeh refund. Vote~ Unanimous On motion of ~r. Dodd, seconded Ny Mrs. ~rene, the Board approved and authorized th~ County ~mlniskra~or te execute any necessary doo~m~tS for G & T Construction Company who sub.it,ed the low ~id in the amount of $13,9Bt.~0 for Con[ra¢~ ?(S)i]91, Trollingwood Aelief ~ewer, and ~urther the Board traneferred $14,500 f~om 38~-1-71591-~393 ~o 3R0-1-704~!-439~. Vote: Unanimous On motion cf Mr, Daniel, seconded by ~rs. Girone, the Hoard authorized staff to pro~eod with ~esign and con=,ruction of the sewerm to serv~ seven ezistinq reeidences on Lake Hills and further transferred $30,000 ~rom 3a0-1-7~000-439~ to 3S0-1-71901-~593. Mr. ~edrick stated the next item on the agenda was e request fron ~r. Book.an fo advertise for bidb and constr~t the ~ewers ko serve Brookfield ~divi~ion, Contract 7{g)1321. Mr. Dodd inquired what othe~ projects were still pending for Clover ~ill D~striet. M~. ~ookman stated that ~allinq Creek Farme wac and that thc second half si Forest Acres would not ~e ~orviceable until ~he developers get to t~at point. Mr. Dodd e~ated tha~ he had som~ ~mall area~ which needed some help but ~e tad not felt funds were available and ed~ed that the County may kava to qo wi~h a bond issue ~o do these and oth~r areas. ~irs. Girone needs are identified. ~r. Dodd inquired what fees were ~eing charged £or ~roekfi~ld. Mr. Bookman stated that contracts were in the amount of $750. Mr, Dodd Stated tha~ ~ha rest e~ the County wo~ld have to catch up with Clover Hill District in regar~ to sewer installation. Mrs. Cxrone stated that the Hoar~ would have ~o wo~k up a list of priorities in the near future. ~r. Hedwick stated tha~ if this were approved, it would be the last prejaot until the fund balance could be built up or nnlog$ bads for projecte were under th~ e~timates, After further di~euesion, it wac on motion o~ Mr, Bookman~ ~econded by 34rs. $irone, resolved that staff be authorized to a~vertise bids and cone,Tuck sewers go serve Brookfield Subdivision, Conkraet 7{8}1321~ and further the ~oard appropriated $422,400 ~rom 574 Surplus to 380=1~71321-4393 and ~nbject to the d~v~loper~ Of Whites=one and Solar I signing contracts agreeing to reimburse the County. VOte: Unanimous Daniel excused himself from the meeting. On motion of Pit', Book.an; seconded by Itir'~. Girone, th~ BOard appropriated $33,$5~ from $63 ~urplus to 380-1-61941-4393 for the 81-472 10.B. 2. 10~B.B. lO.B.4. 10.B.6. installation of pumping %acilities at Chesterfield County Airport Industrial Park, Contract 9~81-94C. Ayes: Mr. D©dd, Mr. Book, an, Mrs. Girone and Mr. OTNeill. Absent: Mr. Daniel. On motion o~ Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents ~or C~ntral Builders, Ino. who s%bmltted the iow bid Of $203,5~Q for the construction of the Little Tomahawk Creek P~mping Station. Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Bookman, Mrs. Girone a~d Mr. O'Neill. Absent= Mr. Daniel. On motio~ of Mx. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board authorized the County Administrator ko eMeoute a deed of dedication from whitestcne Associates, A Virginia General Partnership to th~ County of Chesterfield, accepting On behalf of the County, a 10 ft. strip of land adjacent to Wadsworth Drive f~om Midlothian T~rnpike to Whitsstone subdivision, Clovsr District. kyes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Bookman, Mrs. Gir0ne and Mr. O'neill. ~sent: Mr. Daniel. 3n motion of Mr. Bookman~ seconded ~y Mrs. Girohe, the Board ~u=horized the County Administrator tc ~xecute a d~ed of ~edication from NOwazd ~eisseau and Mary Elizabeth Doisseau~ ~illa ~. Johnson; Peyton L. McDaniel and Lucy MoDaniel, to the ~ounty of Chesterfield, acceptinq on behalf of the Couna~, a 50 ft. parcel o£ land required as a second access to the proposed ~roctors Point $~bdivi~ion from ~owlet~ Road, ~ermuda District. Ayes: Mr. Do~d, Mr+ Bookm~n, Mrs. G&rone and Mr. O'Neill. Absent: Mr~ Deniel. On motio~ of Mr. Beckman, seconded by Mrs. Giroue, the Board authorized the C0~nty Administrator to e×scute a deed Of dedication from Joseph Harding, Jr., et al., accepting on behalS of the County the dedication of Old ~undred toad, Clever Hill Ayes: Mr. Dedd, Mr. Bookman, Mrs. Girone eno Ab~en%~ Mr. Daniel. ~r. Daintmr presented the Board with a report of developer water and u~wer contracts executed by the County Administrator. Dn motion of Mr~ Beckman, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the following ~$o!ution was adopted~ Amended Resolution to Abandon A Portion cf Oxbr±d~e ~oad Whereas, ~y r~soluti0n of t~e Board of S~pervisors passed On %pril 8, 1981, a portiOD of Oxbridge Road was abandoned following :onstruction of a new road in lieu thereof which did not ldsquately d~s0ribe %he said abandonment and to %h~ ~x:ent h~rein ~o~ified the Board of Supervisors now desir.es to amend its said 3esolu~ion of April ~, 19~1, but not Otherwise. Mow, Therefore, Be It Resolved by the Board of Supervisors )f Chesterfield County, Virginia, that its resolution %0 abandon portion of 0xbridqe Road passed on April ~, 19Si, be and the ~a~e i~ h~r~by amended and modified to read in part am follows: B1-473 Whereae, in accordance with and pursuant te se~tlon 33.t-72.1 (formerly $3.1-72) of the Code of Virginia ~1~76 Repl. Vol.}, as amended, Oxbridge Road, located in Clover Hill District formerly Dale}, Chesterfield County, Virginia, has been for man, years in the ~econdary SyStem of highways under the control, supervision, management and jurisdiction of the Virginia Department cf Highways, the metes and bounds cf which are shown and described on a plat cf survey entitled~ "Mayfair Estates, Section A, Dale District, Cheeterfield County, Virginia," dated !July 20, 196S, made by Foster a~d Miller, Certi£1ad Surveyors, Richmond, Virginia, and recorded July 26, 1968, in the Clark's Office of th~ Circuit Court of chesterfield County, Virqinia~ in Plat Book 16, pages 62, 63 and 54; and Whereas, by a plat of res~bdivision of the said Section A of May£air ~stat~s dated Aug~et 24~ 1979, made by American Engineers~ Richmond, Virginia, recorded August 30, 1979, in Plat Book 34, pages ~7 and 4~, a new substitute right-cf-way for a )ortion of OMbridge ~oad was dedicated to the County of Chesterfield, Virginia~ and Whereas, construction of the said new road was completed on or about November 1~ 1979, and accepted by the Board of Supervisor~ as a public road on April g, 1981, and accepted into the State Highway System of Roads by the Commissioner of Highways on August 6, 1981, which new road now serves the same citizens as the old road, and the closing of a portion of Oxbrfdge Road as hereinafter described wilI not abridge the rights cf any citizen; and, Whereas, th~ applicant, ¢xbridge Square Limited Partnership, a Virginia Limited Partnurshi~, succ~$~or in interest to the F. 9. Company, a Virginia general partnership, and Irving ~orne~ and William U. Savage are the owners in fee of th~ land located along the portion of Oxbridge Road to bu abandoned, who, :y counsel, are represented and consent to the abandonment of a :office o~ Oxbridge Road es hereafter duscribsd; and Whereas, on application of S. F. P. Company, a V&rginia ~neral partnership, the Board cX Supervisors pas~ed a ~esolution on september 26, 1979, declaring its intent %0 ~oandon the por~ion cf 0xbridge Roa~ hereinafter described after completion of the new road being constructed in lieu thereof and acceptance o~ same into the Secondary ~yStem of Highways by the ~ighway Co~is$iQner, all of which has now been accom~liuhed. Now, Therefor=, be It Resolved by the Board of Supervisors O~ Chesterfield County, Virginia, that pursuant to the provisions of Title 33, Section ~3.1-155 of the Code of Virginia, as a~ended, a portion of o~brldge Road ds~uri~e~ as fellowe: Co,cueing at i~$ line 0£ intersection 130 feet in width with the ZOuth right-of-way line of Hull Stree~ 5cad (Beuta 360) located 400.3 feet no~th of the eastern r~ght-cf-way line of Coup%house Road and proceeding eouthward between parallel line~ eighty feet (~0') in width on a course cf S.22~ll'39"E for a distance of 645 feet to a point, except for turning radius at ~ull Street Road~ the area of which is also included; thence, proceeding north and south a~ the point cf termination of each parallel line on a Course of N.67°48'21"~ for a di~tanc~ of ten feet (I0') to a point; thence proceeding southward parallel line~ from th~ last said ~e~inatien points sixty feet {60'~ on a course of ~.22 t1'39"~ and along an arc having a radius of 9~0.0 feet for a distance variable in length to it~ line of intersection with and terminating at the west right-of-way line.of Oxbridge Road relocatud au fully and particularly ~hown cn.a plat dated September 6, 1979, ~ade by American Engineers, Richmond, Virginia~ to which plat reference is made for a full, complete sad accurate me,es and bounds description of th~ ~aid land, a copy of which is a~tach~d herete~ 81-474 be and the same is hereby vacated an~ abandoned, Be It Further Resolved that the Clerk ef this Board certify a true copy Of this amended, re~olution together with the plat attached to the State ~ighway Commissioner. Be It Further Resolved that the Clerk of this Board certify a =rue copy Of this amended resolution together with the plat attached to tho Clerk of the Circuit Court for recording among the land r~eords in his office. Ayes: Mr. Dedd, Mr. B~nk~nan, Mrs, Giro~e and Mr. O~Neill.. Absent: ~r. Daniel. Mr. Hedrick presented the Soard with a copy of tbs Annual Audit of the Jail Canteen Fund for year ended June 30, 1981 and a copy of ~he status of the contingency funds. Mr. ~edrick ~tated that the County had been notified that tko roads in the following aubdivisions had been officially accepted into the Secondary System ~ffeotive september 28, 1981: Searcy - Sections 4 and 5 Mi~tera Road - Beginning at the intersection with South Street, Route 1141, and roaring southerly Q.1O mile to the intersection with CelaneO Court, th~n continuing southerly 0.~1 mile te the inter~ection with ~uridian Avenue, Route 1140. 0,21 mi. Celanco Court - Beginning at the intersection with ~is~cra Roa~ and running northerly 0.03 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. 0.03 mi Gray$On Estates - Sectio~ 2 Sadberge Drive - Beginning at its intersection with Graves Road~ R~ute 630, extending southwest 0.I0 mile to the intersection of Kathleen Driv%, then southwest 0.10 mile to a cul-de-sac. Kathleen Drive - Beginning at its intersection with sadberge Drive, extending northwest 0.!3 mile to the intersection of Gretchen Drive, then northwest 0.11 mile to the intersection with Kathleen Court, then northwest 0.09 milo to the intersection of Chemin Road. 0.33 mi, Gretchen Drive - ~eginninq at its intersection with Kathleen Drive, extending southwest 6.08 ~ile to a cul-de-sac, 0.08 mi. Kathleen Court - Beginning at its intorsectio~ with Kathloen Drive, extending southwest 0.08 mile to a c~l~de-sac. 0.08 mi,! Chemin Road - Beginning at its inter~setion with Graves Road~ Route 360, extending southwest 0.08 mile to the intersection of Kathleen Drive, then southwest 0.17 mile to a dead cud. Cheeswood - $~ction ~ Chesswoud Drive - Beginning at the ~estsrn end of Chesswood Drive, Route 2847~ and running westerly 0.03 mile to the intersection with Chesswood Circle, then continuing we~terly 0.05 mile to the intersection with Telstar Road, then Continuing westerly 0.10 mile tQ the intersection with Greatbridge Road. 0.18 mi. 81-475 $1-476 Chessweod Circle - Buginning at the inter,sc=ion with Chesswood Drive and running southerly ~.G8 mile to end in a Cul-de-~ac. 0.08 mi. Telstar Road - Beginning at the intersection with Chesswood Drive and r~nning southerly 0.06 mile to end in a dead end. 0.06 mi. Greatbride Road - Beginning at the intersection with Chesuwood Drive and running northerly 0.04 mile to end in a dead end, again Greatbridge Road, beginnin~ at the intersection with Chesswood Drive and running southerly 0.06 mile to the intersection with Greatbridge Court, thun continuing southerly ~.01 mile to end in a dead end. 0.11 mi. Greatbr~dge Court - Beginning at the intersection with Greatbridge Road and running easterly 0.0? mile to end in a cul-de-sac. 0.07 mi. 0akmont - ~Sction 1 Laurel Oak ~osd - Beginning at the intersection with Hopkin6 Roa~, Rou~e 637, and running westerly 0.03 mile to the intersection with Laurel Oak Couxt, then continuing westerly 0.05 mile to the intersection with Water Oak Court, then continuing westerly 0.14 mile to end in a temporary turnaround. 0.22 mi. Laurel Oak Court - Beginning at the intersection with Laurel Oak Road and runnin~ ~outherly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. 0.96 mi. Water Oak Court - Beginning at the intersection with Laurel oak Road and running southerly ~.0~ mile to end in a col-ds-sac. 0.06 mi. Greenfield - Section K Esquire Road - Beginnin~ where State Maintenance u~ds, Route 1990, and going 0.03 mile northerly to intersecti0~ with Rockle~qe Road, then eentinuinu i northerly 0.14 mile to inter,co%ion wi~h ~avny R~ad, ' then continuing 0.12 mile northerly to intersection with Guilford Read. 8.29 mi. RQokledge Road - ~sginning where State Maintenance ends, Route 2541, and going 0+02 mile Westerly to intersection ~ith Esquire Road. 0.02 mi. Savoy Road - Beginning wh~re State ~aintenance ends, Bents 2540, and going 0.03 mile westerly to intersection with Esquire Road, then continuing O.03"mile westerly to end in a dead end. 0.06 mi. ~uilford Road - Beginning where State Maintenance ends, Route ~546, and going 0.03 mile westerly to intersection ~ith Esquire Boad~ then continuing 0,03 mile westerly to dead end. 0.06 mi. Plum Street - Beginning at the intersection with Shiloh Drive, Route 750, and running westerly 0.1I mile to the intersection with Telstar Road~ the~ continuing iwesterly 0.13 mile to the intersection with Gre'atbri~g~ ~oad. 0.24 mi. Telstar Road - Beginning at the intersection with Plum Street and running northerly 0.0] mile te ~ie into ~×isting Telstar Road, Sscti0n B of Chesswood. 0.§9 mi. GreatbTidge Rea0 - Beginning at the intersection with Plum St,set and running northerly 0.06 mile to the intersection with Greatbridge Terrace, then continuing northerly 0.08 mile to tie into existing Greatbridge Road, Section B of Chesswood Subdivision. 0.14 Greatbridge Terrace - Beginning at tbs intersection with Sreatbridge Koad and running easterly 0.07 mil~ to end in a cul-de-sac. 0.07 m~ Meatheridqe - Sections i and 2 Cica,lake Road - Beginning where State Maintenance ends on existing Clea~lake Road, Route 1421, extending northerly 0.35 mile to th~ intersection of ~oad. 0.35 Briarcli~, Sections 2 an~ 3 Marbleridge Road - Beginning wh~re ~tate Maintenance ends On sxis~ing ~arbleridge Read, ~oute 1825, extending southwest 0.09 mile %0 the intersection of Queensway Road, then southwest 0.09 mile to the intersection of Cica,lake Road, E~atheridge, Section 2, ~h~n scu=hwest 0.03 mils to a temporary turnaround. 0.21 Queensway Road ~ Beginning at its intersection with Marbleridge Road, extending nerttl¥¢es~ 8.06 mile to the intersection cf Queensway Court, then northw%st mile to th~ ine~rseetlcn o~ Paddenswiek Cent=, then northwest 0.12 mile to a temporary turnaround. 0.24 Queensway Court - Beginning at its intersection with Qu~ensway Road, extending southwest 0.0~ mile to a cul-de-sac. 0.06 Paddeaswiek Court - Beginning at its intersection with Queen,way Road, extending soutkwest 0.04 mile to a cul-de-sac. 0.04 m~ On motion of Mr~ Boo~n~ $~conded by Mr. O'Neill, the Beard ~ancelled the regularly sckeduled meeting set for November 12, 1981, originally schedule~ for November 11, 19B1. Since NoveIKb~ llth is a 8tats ~oliday, the Cnda of the Virginia, 1950, a~ amended~ prohibits any public meetings to be hel~ on such holidays. Ayes: Mr. bodd, ~r. Sook~an, Mrs. Gl,one and Mr. O'Neill. Absent: Mr. Daniel. On ~otlen of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Gl,one, =he soard went into ~×ecutive Session to discuss the use Of r~al property for public purposes and legal matters as permitted by Section 2.1-344(a) 2 and 6, respectively, of %ha Code of Virginia, Ayes~ Mr. Dodd, M~. Beokm=n, Mrs. Gl/one and Mr. O'Neill. Absent: Mr. Daniel. Mr. Daniel returned tu the meeting during Executive S~ssien. ReSearching On motion of Mr. Dedd, s~conded by Mr. Daniel, the Board adjourned at 5:30 p.m. until 9:00 a.m. on October 28, 1981. Barry G./Danie'l ~ Chairm~n~ Vote: Una~imou~ Ri~ha'rd L ~ Hedrimk County Administra~mr 81-477