Loading...
04-28-1999 Packet CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Meeting Date' April 28, 1999 Item Number: Page 1 of 1 6 ,a. Subiect: Work Session On County Year 2000 Preparedness County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Hold a Work Session to Review Status of the County's Year 2000 Preparedness Summary of Information: The Century Date Change Task Force comprised of representatives from Information Systems Technology, Internal Audit, Budget and Management, Fire-Emergency Services and Utilities has been preparing for the Year 2000 since the summer, 1997. The Year 2000 implementation plan has focused on the following critical areas: county business application systems, mainframe hardware and software, personal computer hardware and software, voice communication systems, county suppliers, embedded systems, and external data exchanges. County efforts in these areas are expected to be substantially complete by June 30, 1999. Current emphasis is on the preparation of business contingency plans, response to emergency operations plan exercises and community awareness. Staff will review the attached information at the work session. Preparer: ~ 0~'~ JJam~ J.L. ~egmaier Attachments: Yes Title: Deputy County Administrator, Management Services ~No 0.01 0 X mmm m mmm lmm m 0 (~ m,mx xm,m X W I X ~J X E 0 Z 0O5 ~J ~ 0 007 LLI LLI LLI LL! I/ 0 mi / 0 Z II 0 ~ ';" 008 ILl CD 0 ~ > 0 0 O 0 · · · '" 0 LI. 0 010 a..r~ Ow LU X l.l.! i i iii 0 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OFSUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meetin,cj Date: A 1999 Item Number: 6. B. Subject: Work Session on the County Administrator's Proposed FY2000 Biennial Financial Plan, Proposed FY2000 Community Development Block Grant and HOME Annual Plan and Proposed FY2000-2004 Capital Improvement Program County Administrator's Comments: ~~~.c~ ~~/--- - County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Hold a final work session on the County Administrator's Proposed FY2000 Biennial Financial Plan, Proposed FY2000 Community Development Block Grant and HOME Annual Plan, and Proposed FY2000-2004 Capital Improvement Program Summary of Information: This time has been set for a final work session on the County Administrator's Proposed FY2000 Financial Plans. Attached is a list of anticipated and proposed revisions to the plans which will be reviewed at the work session. These revisions and any additional revisions requested will be incorporated prior to budget adoption. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budget and Mana.qement Attachments: Yes o o o o 0 0 o o o .< 016 0 0 0 o~ I I II 0 oO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ®~ o ~ ~. o .2,0 .e~ ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 7 .^. Subject: Board Action on Zoning Ordinance Amendment Relating to Development Standards in the Regional Employment Center of The Route 288 Corridor Plan County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of the attached Zoning Ordinance amendment. Summary of Information: On April 14, 1999, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on the attached Zoning Ordinance amendment and there was no opposition. The Planning Commission recommended this amendment and addition to the County's Zoning Ordinance to the Board of Supervisors on February 16, 1999. This amendment and addition will provide for higher quality development in this area. Preparer:.._/. ThOmas E. J~nn Title: Director of Planning Attachments: Yes ~ No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: Summary of Information: (Continued) Changes include: · Paved surface treatment for all new development. · Reduction in number of parking spaces for developments with pedestrian access system. Changes in setbacks and landscaping requirements. Requirements for shoe-box lighting on streets and within projects. Limitations and screening requirements for outdoor storage. Screening of solid waste storage areas. Enhanced architectural treatment. Increased building heights. Orientation of loading and storage areas away from limited access roads. Design of BMP's to be aesthetic enhancements to development. Attachments: · Proposed Ordinance amendment. The Ordinance on orange-colored paper should be adopted if the Board adopts The Route 288 Corridor Plan with the orange cover. The ordinance on white paper should be adopted if the Board adopts The Route 288 Corridor Plan with the white cover. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MANUAL OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIEI,D, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING SECTION 19-518, 19-580, 19-581, AND ADDING SECTIONS 19-590.1 19-590.2, 19-590.3, 19-590.4, 19-590.5, 19-590.6, 19-590.7, 19-590.8, 19-590.9 and 19-509.10 RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE REGIONAL EMPLOYMENT CENTER AREA OF THE ROUTE 288 CORRDOR PLAN BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 19-518, 19-580, 19-581 of the Development Standards Manual of the Code of the Coun~ of Chesterfield, !997, as amended, are amended and reenacted to read as follows: Sec. 19 - 518. Plant material specifications. OOO (g) Perimeter Landscaping. Landscaping shall be required at the outer boundaries of projects or and in the required yards of a lot, parcel or development, except when driveways or other openings may be required. There shall be different landscaping requirements in yards and parking areas, as identified herein and in the particular districts, which shall be provided as follows: OO0 (11) Perimeter landscapingI.. At least one and one-half(1.5) times perimeter landscaping C (option I). Sec. ooo 19-580. IIighway ,~o.,,uo, ~,isti-[ct. Specified Areas. The Highway Corridor District shall include those lands identified on the zoning district map that include: (b) (ai) The Jefferson Davis Highway corridor; and (bii) The Route 360 corridor. The Employment Center District shall include all lands identified on the Route 288 Corrido, Plan that include: (!) Regional Employment Center. 1014(05):23327.1 April 22, 1999 at 9:44 a.m. Sec. 19-581. General development standards. · ~,,y ,~,~,~,,~ ~,~[.~[~, Except for the development standards contained in the Highway Corridor District and the Employment Center District, which shall apply to property within those districts, all applicable county-wide, emerging growth or post-development standards shall be met. 000 (2) ThatSections19-590.1, 19-590.2, 19-590.3, 19-590.4, 19-590.5, 19-590.6, 19-590. 7, 19-590. 8, 19-590. 9 and 19-509.10 are added to the Development Standards Manual of the Code of the Coun_tV of Chester_field, 199 7, as amended, to read as follows: ARTICLE IH. DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS - OFFICE, COMMERCIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL DIVISION 2. DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS -SPECIFIED AREAS Sec. 19-590.1. Purpose and Intent of Employment Center District: The purpose of this division is to provide standards that will encourage and enhance the development of quality office and industrial parks. The intent of this division is to establish special regulations which mandate specific land use regulations and development standards and requirements to produce compatible land use patterns; create aesthetically pleasing developments; encourage the use of quality materials for building construction; provide continuity and sufficient levels of landscaping and lighting throughout each development, and promote improved pedestrian and vehicular circulation while maintaining flexibility where possible. Sec. 19-590.2. Design Standards for Off-Street Parking in the Employment Center District, (a) Surface Treatment: With the exception of areas where track mounted equipment is stored, parking areas and driveways shall be paved with concrete, bituminous concrete or similar material. (b) Number of Spaces: The required number of parking spaces may be reduced by ten (10) percent if the development includes a pedestrian way that connects to an existing or proposed pedestrian way, or that may be connected to a future pedestrian way, Sec. 19-590.3. Yard Requirements in the Employment Center District 1014(05):23327.1 April 22, 1999 at 9:44 a.m. 2 (a) Setbacks Along Major Arterials excluding limited access roads: All buildings, drives and parking areas shall have a minimum seventy-five (75) foot setback from the proposed rights-of-way of major arterials, excluding limited access roads, as indicated on the comprehensive plan. Within these setbacks, landscaping shall be installed in accordance with perimeter landscaping I. (b) Front and Corner Side Yards Setbacks Along Collector Streets: The from and comer side yard setback for buildings, drives, and parking areas shall be a minimum of forty (40) feet from the proposed rights-of-way of collector streets, as indicated on the comprehensive plan. However, in an I-2 district, setbacks shall be increased to sixty (60) feet, and in an I-3 district, setbacks shall be increased to ninety (90) feet. Within these setbacks, landscaping shall be installed in accordance with perimeter landscaping C. (c) Other Front and Corner Side Yards: The front and corner side yard setback for buildings, drives, and parking areas shall be a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet from proposed rights-of-way except those indicated as limited access, major arterials, and collector streets on the comprehensive plan. Within these setbacks, landscaping shall be installed in accordance with perimeter landscaping B__~. Sec. 19-590.4. Exterior Li~htin~ in the Employment Center District, (a) Street Lighting: Street lighting shall be installed at all corners of street intersections. Street lights shall be high cut off shoe-box style lighting fixtures. (b) Lighting Within a Site: Parking lot and access lighting within an individual site shall be high cut off.shoe-box style lighting fixtures and shall not exceed thirty (30) feet in height and designed to minimize light spillover into residential areas. Sec. 19-590.5. Outdoor Storage in the Employment Center District (a) Amount: Outdoor storage, if permitted by the underlying zoning district as accessory to a permitted use, shall be limited to no more than 50% of the gross floor area of the principal use. (b) Screening: All outdoor storage shall be screened from view from any adjacent properties and public rights-of-way. Screening shall be accomplished by building design or by the use of durable architectural walls constructed of comparable materials to the principal building and using a design compatible to the principal building on the property. Sec. 19-590.6. Screening of Solid Waste Storage Areas in the Employment Center District. All solid waste storage areas shall be screened from view of adjacent property and public rights-of way by a masonry_ or concrete wall which is constructed of comparable materials to and designed to be compatible with the principal building that the solid waste storage area serves. 1014(05):23327.1 April 22, 1999 at 9:44 a.m. Sec. 19-590.7. Architectural Treatment in the Employment Center District. Architectural treatment of buildings, including materials, color and style, shall be compatible with buildings located within the same project or within the same block or directly across any street. Compatibility may be achieved through the use of similar building massing, materials, scale, colors or other architectural features. Nothing in this section shall preclude the use of different materials on different building exteriors but rather, shall preclude the use of inferior materials on sides which face adjoining property. No building exterior (whether front, side, or rear) shall consist of architectural materials inferior in quality, appearance or detail to any other eXterior of the same building. No building exterior (whether front, side or rear) shall be constructed of metal or unadorned concrete block. The exterior of outbuildings shall not be constructed of materials inferior to those of the prima _ry building and shall be architecturally consistent with the primary_ building. Mechanical equipment, whether ground-level or rooftop, shall be screened from view of adjacent property and public rights-of-way and designed to be perceived as an integral part of the building. Sec. 19-590.8. Heights in the Employment Center District Except as outlined in sections 19-507 and 19-507.1, the height of any building within any O or 1 district shall be permitted to be a maximum of 150 feet in height. The height of any other building or structure shall be as specified in § 19-598. Sec. 19-590.9. Loading and Storage Areas in the Employment Center District. Buildings adjacent to limited access roads shall be oriented such that loading and storage areas are, located internally. This shall be accomplished through the use of building orientation and site design. Sec. 19-590.10. Design of BMP's in the Employment Center District Any BMPs required for water quantity or quality control shall be designed as retention basins and shall be landscaped or otherwise improved so that the facilities become visual enhancements. BMP's shall include landscaping adjacent to the BMP's, gently sloping banks, and aquatic, and where: appropriate, sub-aquatic plantings. Any fencing used shall be of an ornamental design. At the tim~ of site plan review, a plan depicting these requirements shall be submitted for review and approval. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1014(05):23327.1 April 22, 1999 at 9:44 a.m. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of,2 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 7. B. Su~ect: Board Action on Zoning and Utilities Ordinance Amendment Relating to the Use of Public Water and Wastewater Facilities in The Route 288 Corridor Plan Area County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of the attached Zoning Ordinance amendment. Summary of Information: On April 14, 1999, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on the attached Zoning and Utilities Ordinance amendment and there was no opposition. The Planning Commission, on a 4-0-1 vote (Mr. Marsh abstained), recommended this amendment to the County's Zoning and Utilities Ordinances to the Board of Supervisors on February 16, 1999. This amendment will require the use of public water and wastewater facilities for development zoned after the adoption of this ordinance. Thomas E. Jacobson Title: Director of Planning Attachments: Ycs -~No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: Summary of Information: (Continued) Exemptions to this change include: Temporary manufactured or mobile homes; Structures that were authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions which were renewed after the effective date of the Ordinances; Structures authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions that are granted after the effective date if the use is incidental to a primary use previously allowed with a private well or septic system; Governmental structures or institutional buildings; Residences located on lots exempt from the subdivision ordinance; Homes on lots over one acre and located in the lowest density land use category in the Pla~ are exempt from the wastewater provisions of this ordinance, but are required to hook up to public water. Attachments: · Proposed Ordinance amendment. The Ordinance on orange-colored paper should be adopted if the Board adopts The Route 288 Corridor Plan with the orange cover. The Ordinance on white paper should be adopted if the Board adopts The Route 288 Corridor Plan with the white cover. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 17-91, 18-63 AND 18-64, RELATING TO WATER AND WASTEWATER CONNECTIONS IN THE ROUTE 288 CORRIDOR PLAN AREA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 17-91, 18-63 and 18-64 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and reenacted to read as follows: Sec. 1%91. Size of lots served by conventional septic systems. (a) In any subdivision utilizing conventional septic systems the average lot size shall be no less than 40,000 square feet, at least 90 percent of all lots in the subdivision shall be at least 40,000 square feet in size, and no lot shall be less than 30,000 square feet in size. In addition, all lots in the subdivision shall have a minimum lot width of 120 feet measured at the building line. This subsection shall apply to any property for which residential zoning is obtained after February 23, 1989; however, this subsection shall apply to every residential lot which is recorded after January 1, 1991. (b) No subdivision of land within the Southern and Western Plan Area for which residential zoning is obtained after ,~.~,~ ~.~,~.~-~'- _L,___ uaL~ ~ .... m~ ~'-~'L,,,~ .... ~uu~,~L~u,' ..... :-'- June 23, 1993 may utilize conventional septic systems unless all lots in such subdivision are at least one acre in size and located in those areas designated in the county's comprehensive plan for single-family residential use in the lowest density category. (Areas colored tan on the Southern and Western Area Land Use Plan.) ~ No subdivision of land within the Route 288 Corridor Plan Area for which residential zoning is obtained after (effective date) may utilize conventional septic systems unless all lots in such subdivision are at least one acre in size and located in those areas designated in the county's comprehensive plan for single-family residential use in the lowest density category_. (Areas colored tan on the Route 288 Corridor Plan area). (Code 1978, § 18.1-55) Sec. 18-63. 000 Mandatory water connections in certain areas. OOO 1014:23333.1 1/12/99 2:38 PM 034 (b) All structures which are located on property that is included in the Southern and Western Area Plan described in the subdivision ordinance and which received zoning approval after June 23, 1993 shall connect to the water system. However, the following structures shall not be required to connect unless connection to the water system is otherwise required by law: (1) Tempora _fy manufactured or mobile homes M~oit-e-home~; (2) Structures that were authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions which were renewed after June 23, 1993; (3) Structures that are authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions that were granted after June 23, 1993 if the use that is permitted by the conditional use or special exception is incidental to a principal use that was previously allowed with a private well; (4) Governmental structures and institutional buildings; and (5) Residences that are located on lots that are exempt from the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. (c) All structures which are located on property that is included in the Route 288 Corridor Plan Area as shown in comprehensive plan, and which received zoning approval after (adoption date here) shall connect to the water system. However, the following structures shall not be required to connect unless connection to the water system is otherwise required by law: (1) Temporary_ manufactured or mobile homes; Structures that were authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions which were renewed after (adoption date here); 312) Structures that are authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions that were granted after (adoption date here) if the use that is permitted by the conditional use or special exception is incidental to a principal use that was previously allowed with a private well; 4fi) Governmental structures and institutional buildings; and ~ Residences that are located on lots that are exempt from the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. (cd) For purposes of this section "structure" and "institutional building" shall have the same meaning as in the zoning ordinance. (de) The planning commission may grant exceptions to subsections (b) and (c) during schematic plan, site plan or tentative subdivision review. The Planning Commission may also grant exceptions to subsections (b) and (c) to an applicant who files an application with the planning department on a form prescribed by the director of planning and who pays a fee of $260.00 to the planning department, if the applicant is not subject to the schematic, site plan or subdivision review process, iftThe planning commission shall finds that: (1) The use ora private well will not adversely affect the ability to extend public water to other property; (2) The use of a private well will not encourage future development that is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan; and (3) The use of a private well is not reasonably likely to adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. The planning commission may impose conditions to mitigate the i~npact of any exception that it 1014:23333.1 2 1/12/992:38 PM grants. (Code 1978, § 20-43) Sec. 18-64. Mandatory wastewater connection in certain areas. (a) All structures which are located on property that is included in the Southern and Western Area Plan described in the subdivision ordinance and which received zoning approval after June 23, 1993 shall connect to the wastewater system. However, the following structures shall not be required to connect unless connection to the wastewater system is otherwise required by law: (1) Single-family dwellings on lots which are at least one acre in size and which are located in areas that are designated in the comprehensive plan for single-family residential use in the lowest density category (areas colored tan on the Southern and Western Area Land Use Plan); (2) Temporary manufactured or tVtmobile homes; (3) Structures that were authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions which were renewed after June 23, 1993; (4) Structures that are authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions that were granted after June 23, 1993 if the use that is permitted by the conditional use or special exception is incidental to a principal use that was previously allowed with a septic system; (5) Governmental structures and institutional buildings; and (6) Residences that are located on lots that are exempt from the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. (b) All structures which are located on property that is included in the Route 288 Corridor Plan Area as shown in the comprehensive plan, and which received zoning approval after (adoption date here) shall connect to the wastewater system. However, the following structures shall not be required to connect unless connection to the wastewater system is otherwise required by law: (1) Single-family dwellings on lots which are at least one acre in size and which are located in areas that are designated in the comprehensive plan for single-family residential use in the lowest density category_ (areas colored tan on the Route 288 Corridor Plan area) Temporary. manufactured or mobile homes; Structures that were authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions which were renewed after (adoption date here); Structures that are authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions that were granted after (adoption date here) if the use that is permitted by the conditional use or special exception is incidental to a principal use that was previously allowed with a septic system; Governmental structures and institutional buildings; and Residences that are located on lots that are exempt from the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. 1014:23333.1 1/12/99 2:38 PM 036 (bc) For purposes of this section, "structure," "single-family dwelling" and "institutional building" shall have the same meaning as in the zoning ordinance. (ed_) The Planning Commission may also grant exceptions to subsections (b) and (c) to an applicant who files an application with the planning department on a form prescribed by the director of planning and who pays a fee of $260.00 to the planning department, if the applicant is not subject to the schematic, site plan or subdivision review process, if tThe planning commission shall find~ that: (1) The use of a septic system will not adversely affect the ability to extend public sewer to other property; (2) The use of a septic system will not encourage future development that is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan; and (3) The use of a septic system is not reasonably likely to adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. The planning commission may impose conditions to mitigate the impacts of any exception that it grants. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1014:23333.1 4 1/12/99 2:38 PM CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: ?- ¢. Subject: Board Action on The Route 288 Corridor Plan. County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of The Route 288 Corridor Plan. Summary of information: On April 14, 1999, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on The Route 288 Corridor Plan. The Planning Commission, on a 3-1-1 vote, has recommended The Route 288 Corridor Plan to the Board of Supervisors. The Plan replaces a portion of The Upper Swift Creek Plan, and reviewed part of The Midlothian Community. Plan. With the construction of Route 288, change is coming to the northwestern part of Chesterfield County. The Route 288 Corridor plan provides a guide for development in the area surrounding the extension of Route 288. Important issues addressed in The Route 288 Corridor Plan include: Preparer: Attracting high quality economic development proposals to the area. Updating the County's Thoroughfare Plan to reflect the road network necessary to serve future development in this area. Maintaining the health of the Swift Creek Reservoir as a drinking water source for County residents. Thomas E. Jac{ D:DATA/AGENDA/BOS/1999/APR2899.4/GOK Attachments: Yes [-~ No 042 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: Summary of Information: (Continued) Major recommendations of The Route 288 Corridor Plan include: Provide land uses that maximize economic development opportunities in the area for the future of the County and the region - Approximately 2800 acres have been designated for industrial, office and other employment uses. Adopt standards to increase the quality of development in the area. Promote ongoing efforts to protect water quality in the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir and its tributary streams. Adopt an ordinance that will require new development to utilize public water and sewer. Create a historic designated area around Hallsborough Tavern and Bethel Baptist Church that will protect these structures for the future. Outstanding Issues: There is continued concern and debate in the community regarding the size and scope of retail at the interchange of Routes 288 and 60. Most speakers on the issue favored the more restrictive Appendix C, authored by Midlothian District Planning Commissioner, Will Shewmake, but not included in the Planning Commission's recommended version of the Plan. New concerns regarding the methodology of the water quality modeling have arisen. Citizens requested a 60 day deferral of the vote on the Plan to confer with staff and officials. Should the Board wish to adopt The Route 288 Corridor Plan as recommended by staff and the Planning Commission, a motion for approval of the Plan as shown with the gray cover as Attachment 1 is appropriate. Should the Board wish to adopt the portion of The Route 288 Corridor Plan north of Midlothian Turnpike, a motion for approval of the Plan as shown with the buff cover as Attachment 2 is appropriate. Attachments: Appendix C: Proposed Appendix C: Alternative language to Note 2 of the Land Use Categories (page RT 22, Chart 3). Attachment 1: Draft version of The Route 288 Corridor Plan as recommended by the Planning Commission Attachment 2: Draft version of The Route 288 Corridor Plan as requested by the Board of Supervisors on April 14, 1999. 0.'43 APPENDIX C Appendix proposed by William Shewmake, Midlothian district Planning Commissioner Draft Appendix C The primary purpose of the Regional Employment Center (the "REC") is to encourage the expansion of the local tax base with the development of office, research and development facilities, warehouses and other light industrial uses, as well as retail necessary to support those uses. The REC represents one of the County's last opportunities to establish and promote a large regional employment center. Planning the development of this area is important to the County and its citizens. Typical strip retail development, if allowed, could overwhelm the Route 60/Route 288 corridor and frustrate the goals of the REC. But, this does not mean the REC should be devoid of retail development An employment area of the magnitude suggested by this Plan must allow and provide for retail services needed to support businesses and employees within the REC. Such a design can also create a symbiotic relationship that helps reduce traffic congestion on Route 60 and Route 711. In addition, a convenient, well designed, and attractive shopping complex and lifestyle center within the northwest quadrant of Route 288 and Route 60 can stimulate economic growth by expanding and diversifying the local tax base. However, any retail development that simply duplicates the existing retail development by drawing essentially from the existing market area would not be beneficial to the overall tax base of the County. Ample additional areas for future retail development have already been designated and allowing typical retail to continue to creep down Route 60 would only serve to cannibalize existing retail and frustrate other plans which already provide for additional retail. Instead, a lifestyle center would be desirable if it did not replace existing retail but was instead designed to attract shoppers from a different and wider (regional) market The lifestyle center could serve as a focal point for the REC, contribute to the local ambiance, and create a 'sense of place." Consequently, a high fashion and regional scale lifestyle commercial development (in addition to any permitted supporting and associated/integrated neighborhood scale retail uses) would be appropriate within the northwest quadrant of Route 288 and Route 60 based on the following cdteda: 1. The majority of the proposed major tenants are cla_ssffied as high end/high fashion companies. Examples include, but are not limited to, Nordstroms, Bloomingdales, Neiman Marcus, Lord and Taylor, and Saks Filth Avenue or another anchor store of comparable quality. A focus should also be on tenants with a 'flagship" store strategy. 2. Flagship stores are larger and have a broader scope of merchandise than a prototypicai regional mall store. These retailers may combine multiple divisions or merchandise collections within one store. These type of stores are also strategically located to draw customers from a larger geographic base. Usually, though not exclusively, flagship stores have one large store to serve a large metropolitan region. 3. High end furnishing or home accessory tenant 4. Entertainment tenants such as movie theaters, other performance venues such as community stage theaters, or theme destination entertainment retailers. 5. Related uses, such as offices, hotels, upscale restaurants, residential units, and other entertainment uses could also be included within such a lifestyle center provided they are integrated into the complex. If properly integrated or planned, such a complex could also contain some neighborhood retail uses. 6. Route 288 adjacent to the Regional Employment Center should be open to traffic before any regional retail center is opened. 7. This high-end retail development should complement the employment center and not overwhelm it. 8. Design standards should incorporate architectural compatibility within the lifestyle employment center. 9. Any associated and supporting retail use should avoid typical 's~'ip commercial' characteristics and provide architectural compatibility, intedor circulation, pedestrian access features, and other design elements to better integrate such uses into the REC. 044 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The newest gateway into Chesterfield County, the Route 288 Corridor, will provide unmatched economic development potential for northwestern Chesterfield. Currently, this area mainly contains agricultural uses and vacant land. Over the next several years, with effective planning and the support of local property owners and citizens, this area can become one of the region's premier office and light industrial employment centers. Important Issues addressed in the Route 288 Corridor planning effort include: · Recognizing the key strategic location of the Route 288 Corridor for future economic development in northwestern Chesterfield County. · Updating the County's Thoroughfare Plan to reflect the road network necessary to serve future development in this area. · Maintaining the health of the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir as a drinking water source for County residents. · Attracting high quality economic development proposals to the area. · Providing adequate public facilities to address the impact of new development. Key Findings include: · Vacant Land: The area is largely undeveloped and zoned for agriculture at this time, with only three subdivisions and a few other residences scattered throughout the study area. · Potential for Change: With the construction of Route 288, the area will see tremendous change over the next several years, from development of infrastructure to the development of new office parks and light industrial uses. · Swift Creek Reservoir: A model developed by a member of the County's Watershed Committee found that existing and projected land uses in the watershed would result in an in-lake phosphorous concentration of .0493 milligrams/liter (mg/I). A consultant-conducted study found that the land use modifications anticipated by this Plan would result in an in-lake phosphorous concentration of .0501 mg/I, a 1.5 percent increase over the concentration predicted by the original watershed committee model. While both the original model and the consultant's study evaluated the impact of several land use scenarios on phosphorus concentrations in the Reservoir, the values reported in this discussion refer only to average lot sizes of one half acre. This residential density was used because it is considered to be the most likely to be implemented. · Public Facilities: There are limited public facilities and utilities in the area. As development occurs, public utilities will have to be constructed by the developers. · Historic-Resources: There are four (4) historic resources in the study area; only one (1) of them, Hallsborough Tavern, is designated as a County histodc landmark. All four (4) are in good condition. · Emerging Opportunities: This area, due to its proximity to an excellent transportation network, regional employment centers and a well educated work force, is poised to become another regional employment center. Major Recommendations of The Plan: · Provide land uses that maximize economic development opportunities in the area for the future of the County and the region. · Adopt standards to increase the quality of development required in this area. · Promote ongoing efforts to protect water quality in the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir and its tributary streams. · Adopt an ordinance that will require new development to utilize public water and sewer. · Create a historic area around Hallsborough Tavern and Bethel Baptist Church that will protect these structures for the future. DRAFT 2J23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Table Of Contents Introduction The Citizen Participation Process Existing Conditions and Important Issues Emerging Opportunities A Plan For Action Goals Recommendations The Land Use Plan Page RT 1 RT 2 RT 3 RT 13 RT 16 RT 17 RT 20 Map List of Maps A Base Map B Approved Area Developments C Existing Generalized Land Use D Historic Resources E Character Type Map F The Route 288 Corridor Land Plans Use and Thorouahfare Follows Page RT 1 RT 4 RT 5 RT 10 RT 12 RT 21 DRAFT 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan INTRODUCTION The Route 288 Corridor Plan area (as shown on Map A), located in northwest Chesterfield County, is an area that is currently used primarily for agriculture, large lot residences or vacant land. With the construction of Route 288, many changes will occur in the area. Route 288 will bring regional access, connecting western Chesterfield with Powhatan, Goochland and Henrico and providing opportunities for the entire County. Route 288's importance to the region is vital. The limited access highway will connect to Powhite Parkway, extend threugh Chesterfield, with new interchanges at Lucks Lane/Center Pointe Parkway, Woolddge Road Extended and Midtothian Turnpike. It will go through Powhatan County, cross the James River, connecting with the West Creek development in Goochland County and Interstate 64. Chesterfield County residents and businesses will then have direct access to Goochland and western Henrico County. This access will provide additional opportunities for economic development in the Route 288 Corridor area that were not present previously. Development that occurs as a result of Route 288 must be guided to ensure that full advantage is taken of this unique opportunity for Chesterfield. This area is an important part of Chesterfield County's economic future. This Plan seeks to maximize the opportunities presented by the construction of Route 288, providing a guide for positive development of the area. How This Plan Works The Route 288 Corridor Plan, once adopted by the Board of Supervisors, will become part of The Plan for Chesterfield, the County's comprehensive plan. The Plan for Chesterfield is used by County citizens, staff, the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors as a guide for future decisions in the County, including, but not limited to, decisions regarding future land use, road networks and rezonings. Once The Route 288 Corridor Plan is adopted, it will replace parts of The Upper Swift Creek Plan (1991) and The Midlothian Community Pl~rl (1989). The adoption of The Route 288 Corridor Plan will not, however, change any of the current ordinance requirements adopted to protect water quality in the Upper Swift Creek watershed. The Route 288 Corridor Platt makes no recommendations to change land uses in The Midlothian Community. Plan, but there are proposed amendments to the County's Thoroughfare Plan within The Midlothian Community. Plarl area that are recommended. A Plan forAction The following main components are found in The Route 288 Corddor Plell; Existing Conditions and Important Issues: This information forms the factual basis for the goals, recommendations and implementation strategies found in the Plan. Emerging Opportunities: This section highlights changes that will be brought by Route 288 and the opportunities that are associated with its construction. · Goals: These are general statements about what is desirable for tile future - what the Plan attempts to accomplish. · Recommendations: These are statements on ways to reach the goals and what actions should be taken to achieve them. · The Land Use and Transportation Plan: The Plan will be used as a guide for future development decisions. DRAFT RTl 2/23/99 ~ · · ~ Study Area Boundary No Scale Prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department November, 1998 Revised Draft (Map A) Rt. 288 Corridor Plan THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS The Importance of Citizen Participation In order for any plan to stand the test of time, citizens must support it. Citizen support for a plan and its concepts is built through a process of citizen involvement where citizens' viewpoints, questions and concerns are considered and taken into account. This Plan seeks to build upon the interests of citizens in the County, present and future. Public Involvement To respond to the high level of citizen and community interest in this Elan, numerous meetings were held with citizens, community groups, property owners and individuals. A mailing list was maintained of all property owners in the area, as well as anyone who requested information about the Plan or attended any meetings about the Plan. At two (2) informational meetings herd in Summer 1997, approximately 180 citizens attended to find out more about the planning process and the study area. Over the course of the next ten (10) months, approximately twenty (20) smaller meetings were held with interested citizens to keep them informed about the planning process. In June 1998, the concepts of the Plan were reviewed with citizens for their input at four (4) public meetings, with a total attendance of approximately 200 people. Citizens shared ideas with staff throughout the planning process and offered staff suggestions to make this Plarl one that will be successful in the future. The Route 288 Corridor Plan's successful implementation will be a joint effort by the County and community. DRAFT RT2 2_/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS AND IMPORTANT ISSUES Extensive analysis of existing conditions in the Route 288 Corridor planning area, including valuable information generated through the citizen participation process, forms the foundation for identifying key planning issues and factors. Information about the Route 288 Corridor was gathered from many sources, including field surveys and County records. An understanding of the characteristics and trends that influence development potential in the area provides a sound basis for planning and policy decisions that will shape the Route 288 Corridor's future. Key findings from the research include: · The majority of the land in the planning area is currently vacant or held in large agricultural or residential parcels; · Numerous proposed large scale development projects are zoned in or near the planning area that could have a significant effect on future growth and traffic patterns; · The area has important environmental features, including the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir watershed, streams and wetlands. Demographic and Economic Information Demographic and economic information was obtained from 1990 U. S. Census data. The data was updated where possible by using field surveys conducted by the Chesterfield County Planning Department to determine the number and type of houses in the area. Estimates of population were then based on the observed number of houses multiplied by the number of persons per household in 1990. · Population: The population of the planning area in 1997 was approximately 1,040 people, .4 percent of the 1997 Planning Department's County-wide estimate of 250,000. Income and Unemployment: 1990 Census data shows unemployment in the planning area was 2 percent, below the County-wide figure of 3.3 percent. The estimated 1990 median household income of the planning area was $66,535, above Chesterfield's $43,604. 'The poverty level was 2.7 percent compared to the County's 6 percent. Chart 1 Home Ownership Comparisons Study Area ~IIBIII~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ a~a I'"Ownerl Countywide ~ ~ ~ =~ I · Renter 0% t0% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Source: Chesterfield County Planning Department/U.S. Census (1990) · Community: The community is very stable as the area is rural and has seen slow growth. Chart 1 shows that 96 percent of the planning area's residences are owner-occupied. Land Use The Route 288 Corddor planning area consists mostly of agricultural uses and vacant land. Land use data was gathered from an existing database of County real estate tax records and field surveys. There DRAFT RT3 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan are 526 parcels in the planning area. The combined area of those parcels is approximately 6,943 acres; 2.4 percent of Chesterfield County's 285,702 total acres. Large Tracts: There are thirty-three (33) parcels that each exceed fifty (50) acres, and combined account for about 5,022 acres or 72 percent of the planning area's acreage. Approximately 67 percent of these parcels are zoned for agriculture and approximately 72 percent are currently vacant or used for agriculture. These tracts are located throughout the area and present opportunities for future large scale development projects. Existing Zoning: The zoning of property determines the uses that are allowed on that land. For example, property that is zoned for residential land uses will have a zoning category that begins with R. The number following the R represents the required lot size for the category (R-7 requires a minimum 7,000 square foot lot, R-9 requires a minimum 9,000 square foot lot and so on). Agricultural (A) zoning allows large lot residential uses and farm uses. It may also be the zoning category for land that has not yet been zoned to another category for development. Table 1 shows a breakdown of zoning categories for the Route 288 planning area. As shown in the table, the majority of the land in the planning area is currently zoned A. The few office and commercially zoned areas are primarily Table 1 Zoning Analysis Percentages given are rounded. Zoning Acres Pct. A (Agricultural) 4,900 71% R-7 (Residential) 481 7% R-9 921 13% R-I 5 177 3% R-25 33 0% 0-2 (Office) 149 2% C-2 (Commercial) 3 0% C-3 75 1% I-1 (Light Industry) 204 3% Rt. 288 Study Area 6,943 100% Source: Chesterfield County Planning Department located along Midlothian Turnpike with a concentration just before the Powhatan County line. Most of the industrial zoning is in the Sommerville development located on Midlothian Turnpike. I Table 2 Approved Future/Adjacent Developments IBecause most of the existing zoning in this area was zoned through a Conditional Use Planned Development, Ispecific uses allowed may not be reflected through the underlying zoning category. Name Zoning and Acreage per Category Comment Acropolis i69 iO-2 [Mixed -Use development allowing office and commercial i . i uses. [C-3 (41), 0-2 (400) commercial uses. commercial uses. This development also includes the ................ Midlothian campus of John Ty er Community Co lege. Greensprlngs jl,313 !R-9 (1044.7), 0-2 (268) Mixed-Use development allowing residential, office and commercial uses. i iR-MF (21.3), 0-2 (16.6) C-3 (56.7) icommercial, outdoor recreational, and public/semi-public ................................ j... ! iuses. Sommerville ~1~'~ ............. FI'-':I' ....................................................................... ! i~l-~'~ ~0'.~ ' ~'~ ~i~'l~'~ i"~'l'l'(~i~ ~"~:~'~ ~ ~i'~i~ ' ~;' ¥~'~ ~- -" [industrial and commercial uses. W;ii/;i:/;~'/a' ............ '..'~;/~i. ............. . i:Y(¥~'~'B"'~:~i~"~'~'~"~:¥'~':~¥"~j. , , . .............. f~.i~.~a:.~.~..a.~.~i.~.~.i;i..;.ii~c~ii;.~..~i.~.~ii.`j.~F~.~i~.i;.~.~a~~ , Himited commercial uses. source: Ghesterti~lcl Oounty 161arming Department · Approved Area Developments: There are seven (7) major approved developments in, or immediately adjacent to, the planning area and near the proposed .extension of Route 288 (see Map B). These seven (7) developments are Acropolis, CenterPointe, Charter Colony, Greensprings, The DRAFT RT4 2./23199 Virginia Revised Draft (Map B) APPROVED AREA DEVELOPMENTS Watkins , ~ MidrOthian Nurseries ."q Village" Square I~ ,.. NPIKE Charter Charter Colony RD. Note: The boundaries shown are approximate and for general reference only. 00~~' Community Colleoe ,' Charier .i ~_'~ "7 ~- 2'.~ ..... ......... .t'~..'_" 21'?':'" ' ...... /~.:.~:.. --.. :.:: - ........ i ..... ~.2J Z~----~ "' ' .......... ~ ~. '.::. :: .-::.::- ::: ........ : ........ Prepared by the --- - _ Chesterfield County N -GJ'ee~-,_- Planning Department A ~_l~r__-l~-. ';_ _ November, 1998 No Scale -- Brandermill THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Grove, Sommerville and Waterford. All of these projects have seen limited development or have not begun to develop. land Use Analysis This land use analysis reviewed the existing use of property in the Route 288 planning area in 1998 (see Map C). It does not analyze what the land is zoned or what the property is designated for in the future. Undeveloped and Agricultural Land: This category includes vacant land and agricultural uses as well as residential uses on parcels ten (10) acres or greater. It accounts for 200 parcels and 6,285 acres, approximately 90 percent of the total acreage in the planning area. These parcels vary in size and are located throughout the planning area. Most of the land is zoned for agricultural or residential uses. Table 3 Existing Land Use Percentages given are rounded. Land Use Acres Percentage Indeveloped and 6,285 90% Agricultural Residential 445 6% Commercial 107 2% Industrial~Office 81 1% Public,Semi-Public 24 1% Total 6,943 100% Source: Chesterfield County Planning Department Residential: This includes all parcels currently used for homes on less than ten (10) acres. Residential land uses comprise 445 acres (6.4 percent) of the planning area. Approximately one-third of the residences are scattered on agriculturally zoned parcels of less than ten (10) acres in size. The remaining are in residential neighborhoods. Currently there are three (3) neighborhoods in the area: Huguenot Ridge, located on Huguenot Springs Road; Buckingham Manor, on Otterdale Road; and Otterdale, also on Otterdale Road. Huguenot Ridge has thirty (30) approved lots, six (6) of which have been developed. Buckingham Manor has developed thirteen (13) of its eighteen (18) approved lots, while Otterdale Subdivision has developed 137 of its 140 approved lots. Commercial: Commercial uses account for approximately 1.5 percent of the planning area's land use (107 acres). These uses are {ocated along Midlothian Turnpike. The primary commercial uses are Watkins Nursery and Windy Hill Sports Complex. Watkins Nursery grows and sells plants for landscaping purposes and plans to relocate before the construction of Route 288. Windy Hill Sports Complex is on the west-bound side of Midlothian Turnpike just past Huguenot Springs Road. The complex has batting cages, miniature golf, a driving range and has recently added a nine-hole golf course. Industrial: Industrial and office land uses account for 1.2 percent or eighty-one (81) acres of the planning area's uses. These uses include the Sommerville Industrial and Office Park and a Virginia Power substation on Dry Bridge Road, one-half mile south of Midlothian Turnpike. It has several high voltage transmission wires leading to it through several properties. · Public/Semi Public: See Public Facilities on page RT 7. Environmental Factors In guiding future land use decisions in the planning area, environmental features should be considered. Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed: The portion of the planning area south of Midlothian Turnpike is located in this 41,950 acre watershed and contains two (2) of the nine (9) major tributaries that drain to the Swift Creek Reservoir. Located west of Route 288 between Route 360 and Genito Road, the Swift Creek Reservoir covers 1,700 acres. One of Chesterfield County's three (3) principal water sources, it produces approximately eight (8) million gallons of drinking water per day for 30 percent of County citizens. The Reservoir also functions as a recreational and aesthetic resource for residents of DRAFT RT5 2/23/99 Residential Commercial Industrial Public/Semi-Public Vacant/Agricultural Draft (Map O) IRt. 288 Corridor Plan ~ ~ ~ ~StudyArea Boundary 1'4 No Scale Prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department June, 1998 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan surrounding areas. At this time, the Reservoir's overall water quality is good. However, only a small portion of the Reservoir's watershed, approximately 12 percent, is developed. The remainder of the large watershed area has been recommended by County plans for significant future growth. Without adequate management, such growth could result in the generation of large amounts of , nutrients and pollutants on the Reservoir. These could cause taste and odor problems in the treated water, excessive algae blooms and depleted oxygen levels, affecting fish and other aquatic organisms, the aesthetic value of the Reservoir and its viability as a drinking water supply. Further, nutrients and pollution in the Reservoir may have an economic impact as well. As water quality decreases, the cost of treatment can increase. To address all of these concerns, in 1997, the Board of Supervisors adopted a W~tershed Management Plan for the area. The Watershed Management Plan includes an in-lake phosphorous limit and establishes measures such as a reduced phosphorous standard for new residential development and the construction of regional Best Management Practice(BMP) basins to filter pollutants to meet this limit. Watershed Standards and The Route 288 Corridor Plan: Early in the planning process, citizens expressed concern about the continued health of the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir. Their concerns focused on higher intensity uses that may be allowed as a result of this Plan. In order to respond effectively to these concerns, the Environmental Engineering Department contracted with a consultant to update the land uses in the water quality model used by the County and the County's Watershed Management Committee to reflect the recommended land uses in The Route 288 Corridor Plan. The results of this modeling showed that the land use modifications anticipated by this Plan would result in an in-lake phosphorous concentration of .0501 milligrams/liter, a 1.5% increase over the concentration predicted by the original watershed committee model. While both the original model and the consultant's study evaluated the impact of several land use scenarios on phosphorus concentrations in the Reservoir, the values reported in this discussion refer only to average lot sizes of one half acre. This residential density was used because it is considered to be the most likely to be implemented. Tributary Streams: The Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed contains nine (9) tributary streams that lead to the Reservoir. Two (2) of these, Tomahawk Creek and Little Tomahawk Creek, drain to the Route 288 Corridor planning area. Tributary streams are important to the health of the reservoir because they can convey pollutants to the Reservoir. Further, the streams are also important environmental resources. The direct benefits of the streams include providing wildlife habitat and aesthetic value to an area. Stream water quality can be adversely affected as a result of sediment, metals and bacteria running off parking lots and other paved surfaces. In particular, the high levels of imperviousness (surfaces which do not absorb water) typically associated with commercial and high density residential growth can adversely affect streams by increasing the volume of water draining to them. This can result in a number of impacts, including stream bank erosion and sedimentation, resulting in negative impacts on aquatic organisms in the streams and affect aesthetics as well. Where appropriate, stream buffers can provide protection of wetland and floodplain areas which, in turn, serves to control both the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff. Topography and Soils: The topography of the planning area consists principally of fiatlands and rolling hills typical of the Piedmont physiographic region. Soils in the planning area can be characterized as moderately to well drained. There are some areas, however, that are characterized by clayey or hydric soils, which do not drain well. Existing Regulations to Protect the Reservoir: The Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, Upper Swift Creek, Floodplain and Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinances are the regulations that limit the amount of pollutants entering the Reservoir from both non-residential and residential growth. As a DRAFT RT6 2223/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan means of further reducing the amount of pollutants, the recently adopted Watershed Management Plan for the watershed establishes a stringent phosphorus standard for new development and recommends the installation of a series of regional retention basins to filter a significant portion of the pollutants in stormwater runoff from developed land. Existing Regulations to Protect Streams: The two (2) measures to protect the streams are the County's Erosion and Sediment Control and Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act Ordinances. The first Ordinance limits the amount of sediment that is allowed to enter a stream during construction activities. The second Ordinance establishes Resource Protection Areas (RPAs) adjacent to perennial streams. The establishment of RPAs is intended to ensure an adequate buffer between environmental resources (such as wetlands and streams) and development. RPAs reduce and filter the pollutants in stormwater runoff. The RPA boundaries in the watershed were established by delineating an area measured from the limits of the 100 year floodplain where available or from the edge of hydric soils. As it is currently written, the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act Ordinance allows these RPA areas to be reduced by permitting the area to be "redelineated" by measuring the area from field-delineated wetlands rather than the floodplain. In most cases, these redelineations result in a reduction in the RPA, thus affording less protection for the streams. Further, 100 year floodplain areas adjacent to non-perennial streams can be cleared. Public Facilities Facilities: There are no parks, schools, fire or rescue stations currently located in the planning area boundaries. However, the County's 1995 Public Facilities Plan recommends construction of an elementary school in the southeastern part of the planning area by the year 2015. A community park and a fire station are also planned within the planning area. John Tyler Community .College: John Tyler Community College-Northern Branch will be located in the southwestern quadrant of the intersection of Charter Colony Parkway and Woolridge Road Extended. Public Water/Wastewater Systems Existing Water and Wastewater Systems: The use of public water and wastewater systems is currently recommended for all development within The Upper Swift Creek Plan. Provisions of the County Code and conditions of zoning, tentative subdivision and/or site plan approval may require the use of public systems. Due to the variability of construction costs and other factors, specific water and wastewater line extensions needed for future development should be discussed far in advance with the Utilities Department. Information relating to water and wastewater infrastructure may be found in The Water and Wastewater Facilities Pl~r~. The planning area is served by several large water mains, a twenty-four (24) inch line along Midlothian Turnpike (Route 60) and a twenty-four (24) inch line along Coalfield Road. The area is also served by an existing water tank at Huguenot Springs Road. That portion of the planning area located south of Midlothian Turnpike is served by a sixty (60) inch wastewater trunk along Genito Road, the Upper Swift Creek wastewater pumping station and the Bailey's Bridge pumping station. An eighteen (18) to twenty-seven (27) inch wastewater trunk along Little Tomahawk Creek has been DRAFT RT7 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan extended to serve the John Tyler Community College-Northern Campus and adjacent properties. That portion of the planning area located north of Midlothian Turnpike is served by a twenty-one (21) to thirty (30) inch wastewater trunk along Michaux Creek and by the Michaux Creek wastewater pumping station. These two (2) facilities are supported by a thirty/thirty-six (30/36) inch wastewater trunk located along the James River. That area of the Plan bordered by Midlothian Turnpike, Huguenot Springs Road and the Chesterfield/Powhatan County line cannot be served by a direct gravity line extension from the Michaux Creek system. The topography of this area dictates that it naturally drains west toward Powhatan County and would require the construction of a small pumping station to access the public wastewater system. Existing facilities are sized to provide capacity consistent with those land uses reflected in the Plan. Should more intense land uses be pursued which would be considered heavy water users and wastewater generators, detailed analyses may be necessary to address impact on the existing public water and wastewater systems. Future Water and Wastewater Systems: The County's long-standing policy "Growth Pays For Growth," as reflected in the County's Upper Swift Creek Plan is applicable in the Route 288 Corridor planning area as well. Unless the construction of a new facility is undertaken by the County (including upgrading of pumping stations and construction of water tanks) to address system reliability or water quality concerns, the majority of future water and wastewater facilities depicted on the County's Water and Wastewater Facilities Plan are anticipated to be constructed by private development interests. Current County policies may provide some rebating of construction costs to developers for off-site extensions and line over-sizing. Development within the planning area will require the extension of major water mains as well as smaller lines to serve specific sites. Major lines proposed include sixteen (16) inch and twenty-four (24) inch lines along Otterdale Road, north and south of Old Hundred Road, along Old Hundred Road, east and west of Otterdale Road, a twenty (20) inch line along Mt. Hermon Road and a twelve/twenty (12/20) inch line between Robious Road and Midlothian Turnpike. A water tank, to be located in the vicinity of DuVal Road, should provide additional system support for the planning area. The extension of major wastewater trunks, as well as sub-trunks, and collector lines will be required for development within the planning area. Major trunks proposed include an eighteen (18) inch to twenty- seven (27) inch trunk along Tomahawk Creek and an eighteen (18) inch to thirty-six (36) inch trunk along Swift Creek. These trunk extensions will begin at the existing sixty (60) inch trunk along Genito Road and will require smaller extensions along several upstream tributaries. Sub-trunk extensions from the Little Tomahawk and Michaux Creek trunks will be necessary to serve specific development sites. Upgrading or expansion of the Michaux Creek, Upper Swift Creek and Bailey's Bridge wastewater pumping stations will eventually be necessary as development occurs within the planning area and within The UDDer Swift Creek Plan area. The proposed new and expanded facilities are sized to meet the capacity requirements anticipated by those land uses reflected in the Plan. However, should more intense uses be pursued which would require much higher water demands and generate much higher levels of wastewater flows, detailed analyses may be necessary to address system capacity issues. These analyses would need to address the ability of current water sources and treatment plant sites to meet these potential higher demands and flows. Transportation Existing Conditions: Much of the Route 288 Corridor is served by two-lane roads, such as Huguenot Springs Road, Otterdale Road, Old Hundred Road and Coalfield Road. Charter Colony Parkway, a new two- lane facility, was recently completed from the vicinity of Midlothian High School south to Coalfield Road. Midlothian Turnpike (Route 60) is the major East/West road in the Corridor and is a four-lane highway with a median. Traffic signals are located at its intersections DRAFT RT8 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan with Old Hundred Road and Otterdale Road. The following are average daily traffic volumes on some of the major roads in the corridor: Midlothian Turnpike, west of Winterfield Road Charter Colony Parkway, south of Midlothian High School Coalfield Road between Queensmill and the YMCA Huguenot Springs Road Mount Hermon Road between Old Hundred and Hallsboro Roads Old Hundred Road between Dry Bridge and Otterdale Roads Otterdale Road between Midlothian Turnpike and Otterdale Road 23,465 (1997) 2,615 (1997) 15,370 (1997) 1,160 (1996) 340 (1996) 4,260 (1997) 2,150 (1997) Coalfield Road, which originates in the Village of Midlothian and is the primary north/south traffic carrying facility in the Corridor, is the only road that is currently operating at capacity. A Norfolk Southern rail-line runs east and west through the Corridor, south of and parallel to Midlothian Turnpike. According to the Virginia Department of Transportation's (VDOT's) Rail and Public Transportation section, this line carries two (2) trains per day. The design of Route 288 from the Powhite Parkway through the Corridor to the northern County line has been completed. Ultimately, Route 288 in the Corridor area will be a four (4) lane, interstate-style limited access facility with interchanges located at Lucks Lane/Centre Pointe Parkway, Woolridge Road Extended and Midlothian Turnpike. Collector/Distributor (C/D) roads will be provided throughout most of the Corridor. These CID roads will run parallel to the mainline lanes and will allow vehicles entering and exiting Route 288 to do so without interfering with mainline traffic. The initial phases of construction will result in a four (4) lane facility between Powhite Parkway and Midlothian Turnpike and a two (2) lane facility north of Midlothian Turnpike. Right-of-way acquisition is currently underway. First phase construction of the section between the Powhite Parkway and Midlothian Turnpike is scheduled to begin in the Fall of 1998. First phase construction of the section noah of Midlothian Turnpike is scheduled for the Spring of 2000. In 1989, the Board of Supervisors adopted a County-wide Thoroughfare Plan. Changes to the 1989 Thoroughfare Plan will be necessary due to the Route 288 project and approved development in the area. Other Road Projects In The Route 288 Corridor Area: In addition to Route 288, the following are other road projects in or adjacent to the Route 288 Corridor: 1. Old Hundred Road - Between Dry Bridge Road and Otterdale Road, Old Hundred Road has narrow travel lanes and inadequate shoulders. This project will reconstruct two (2) lanes to provide adequate travel lane and shoulder widths and will improve vertical and horizontal alignments where necessary. Although this project is in the current Six Year Construction Plan, construction funds have not been allocated. 2. Woolridge Road Extended - A short section of VVoolridge Road Extended has been completed connecting Charter Colony Parkway, south of Midlothian High School, with Coalfield Road at the YMCA. A further extension of Woolridge Road will connect Coalfield Road at the YMCA with Midlothian Turnpike, east of the Village of Midlothian, at the existing intersection of Midlothian Turnpike with Walton Park Road and Old Buckingham Road. When completed, this road will provide a southern Midlothian bypass and should divert a significant volume of traffic from the section of Midlothian Turnpike that passes through the Village of Midlothian. Construction is underway and should be completed by Fall 1999. 3. Charter Colony Parkway - To improve access to Midlothian High School and the future John Tyler Community College campus, westbound dual left-turn lanes and a traffic signal will be installed at the Midlothian Turnpike/ChaAer Colony Parkway intersection. Additional lanes will be constructed on Charter Colony Parkway, south of Midlothian Turnpike and across the DRAFT RT9 2_./23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan frontage of Midlothian High School, to provide left-turn lanes at school entrances. Construction of this project is anticipated to begin in 1998. Historic Resources This area of Chesterfield County has many significant historical structures (see Map D). Most are still in use today and have been well preserved. Information on historic resources was taken from Jeffrey O'Dell's 1983 book, Chesterfield County: Early Architecture and Historic Sites. The following list of histodc sites includes all of those inventoried in the book which are still existing in the planning area. All of these structures are located near Midlothian Turnpike and are part of what was a small hamlet which centered around Hallsborough Tavern. Bethel Baptist Church (100 Huguenot Springs Road): This structure was erected in 1894 behind Hallsborough Tavern and is the only nineteenth century brick church in Chesterfield County. The building is a Gothic Revival structure with a steep, gable roof sheathed in slate. Chapel Hill (194 Huguenot Springs Road): Built in 1903 by Dr. W. D. Sydnor, this house is a central passage plan I-house featuring a front-cross gable, interior end bdck chimneys and octagonal-roofed turrets. Hallsborough Tavern (16300 Midlothian Turnpike): This structure was originally built by James Howard around 1810 to-serve as a tavern and retail store. The next owner, Austin Spears, added a two story wing in 1832 to accommodate guests. This structure eventually served as the area's post office. This building has been altered several times since its original construction. Currently, it is being used for retail purposes. DRAFT RTl 0 2/23/99 Study Area Boundary N No Scale Prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department November, 1998 Revised Draft (Map D) Rt. 288 Corridor Plan / Bethel Baptist Church Chapel Hill Hallsboro Tavern Mt. Sinai Baptist Church & Cemetary THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Mount Sinai Baptist Church (200 Old Hundred Road): Erected in 1884, this was the first church built to serve the area's African-American community. Construction funds were raised from donations and festivals. The original structure underwent major remodeling in 1948 and again in 1969. Land Character Types Based on field surveys, information provided by County Departments, maps of existing land use, the location of significant water bodies and Chesapeake Bay Resource Protection Areas, a character type inventory of the planning area was conducted as a means of classifying land areas (see Map E). Four (4) character types depict the visual environment of the planning area. Below are the character types, their definitions and significance to the area. · Forested Descriptior]: Managed forests and natural wooded areas which include a mix of pine and hardwood. ' i_~: Forest land is significant both environmentally and aesthetically. Environmentally, forests protect the soil, produce oxygen, provide opportunities for recreation and play a role in a variety of natural environmental systems. Forested land contributes to the rural and natural "feel" of an area and may buffer different land uses from one another. Agriculture and Open Space Description: Cropland, open fields, pastures and recreational areas. Significant;e: Agricultural land uses are particularly significant to the visual quality and ambiance of an area because of the seasonal changes and variety. The textures and colors of the open fields are particularly attractive from rural roadways, especially in areas with rolling terrain. Residential Q_e.S_C. dl~iQQ: Subdivisions are a grouping of suburban type housing linked by a planned road network and are marked with an identifiable entrance. Strip residential development consists of homes located along roadways, generally fronting arterials and collectors in a linear configuration. ~: Although the planning area remains relatively undeveloped, consisting of only three (3) neighborhoods, growth is expected to occur in the next few years as the completion of Route 288 nears. Office, Commercial and Industrial -~: Most of these uses in the planning area, which includes Watkins Nursery, are rural, family-owned businesses or are buffered and blend in with the character of the surrounding area. The exception to this is the Virginia Power substation which is significantly screened from view by forested areas. DRAFT RTl 1 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route ?88 Corridor Plan ~: Currently, these uses account for a very small portion of the development in the planning area. However, upon the completion of Route 288 and other transportation improvements, these types of uses are expected to increase and become dominant in the area. DRAFT RTl2 2/23/99 Revised Draft (Map E) Rt. 288 Corridor Plan Character Type Map ~ Forested ~ Agricultural/Open Space [-----I Residential/Churches ~ Office/Commercial/Industrial Study Area Boundary No Scale Prepared by the Chesterfield Count~ Planning Department January 11, 1999 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan EMERGING OPPORTUNITIES The completion of Route 288 from the Powhite Parkway to Interstate 64 will greatly accelerate development activity in all of northwest Chesterfield County and throughout the region. Not only will this new highway open up access to a relatively undeveloped part of Chesterfield, it will provide a direct link across the James River to Goochland County's West Creek Business Park, home of the proposed Motorola semiconductor plant and western Henrico's business district. Effective planning in this area will assure that, as growth occurs, it is properly guided, taking advantage of a prime opportunity for needed economic development, while maintaining environmental preservation and the County's high quality of life. Chesterfield and The Metropolitan Region's Economy Chesterfield County has historically been a "bedroom community" for the Richmond metropolitan area, providing a greater proportion of places to live than places to work. This has a large fiscal impact on the County, since the cost of providing services to residential development is greater than what it pays the County in taxes (see Chart 2). Business revenue to the County provides most of the additional funds necessary to provide residential services. Therefore, a balance between economic development and residential growth is important. $1,165 Chart 2 Share of Cost of County Services Per Chesterfield Household $642 · Taxes Paid by Household n Taxes Paid by Business · Other Sources $1,930 Source: Chesterfield County Budget Department In 1997, the Chesterfield Planning Department analyzed the County's Comprehensive Plan to determine the number of acres that should be recommended for office and industrial use to meet long-range economic goals for the County. This analysis compared the County's existing share of the region's economic base and the amount of land recommended for office and industrial use in the County's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Using a moderate level growth forecast covering the period to 2044, the analysis identified a land use plan deficit of approximately 2,250 acres of land recommended for industry and 4,350 acres of land recommended for office use, totaling 6,600 additional acres necessary, but not yet designated for, office and industrial uses in the County's adopted Plans. Jobs and Location Chesterfield needs more businesses to balance residential growth and provide quality jobs for its citizens. Not all jobs are created equal; attracting "basic sector" jobs, like those associated with corporate offices and light industry, will be of greater benefit to the citizens of Chesterfield County. These jobs are higher paying, with better benefits, and generate spin-off employment in other economic sectors, such as retail and service. Quality jobs are especially important in the Route 288 Corridor planning area, as most of Chesterfield's workers live in the northwestern part of the County and most of Chesterfield's major employers are in the eastern part of Chesterfield. DRAFT RTl3 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Timing of Development Typically, the demand for residential construction in highway corridors precedes the market for corporate office and light industrial uses. This area is anticipated to have residential demand due to the development of employment centers at West Creek in Goochland, large employment centers in western Henrico and a scarcity of land designated for residential development in Goochland and Henrico. With the construction of Route 288, Chesterfield County will only be a short commute over the new James River bridge. There may also be interest in retail development along Midlothian Turnpike, as businesses consider the potential of attracting commuters from Route 288. However, commercial development is already developed nearby at Chesterfield Towne Center, with additional space already planned and zoned at the Route 288/360 interchange area and east and west of Midlothian Village. Planning and Design Issues The future design and configuration of development in the Route 288 corridor is critical to Chesterfield County. Well-planned and constructed development, consolidated and coordinated to the maximum extent possible, will promote a stronger tax base, an aesthetically pleasing environment and the cost effective provision of County services. Most quality, large-scale suburban office and light industrial development in the Richmond region is found in "corporate parks," such as the Arboretum and the Boulders off Midlothian Turnpike in Chesterfield County, Innsbrook in Richmond's west end and the new West Creek Corporate Park in eastern Goochland County. Common to these developments are basic features that characterize good design and planning including generous landscaping, well designed entrances, use of curbs and gutters along streets, a mix of building heights, effective lighting and parking. Many of these corporate centers have their own stdct development standards but, at the same time, incorporate enough flexibility to accommodate market demand. In many cases, a combination of local zoning requirements, improvements proffered by the center's developer at the time of rezoning and deed covenants established by the developer combine to ensure good design and planning. Well-designed corporate centers play an important part in the success of attracting desirable economic development in a regionally and nationally competitive environment. Haphazard and incremental commercial development, especially industrial uses characterized by prefabricated metal buildings, inadequate landscaping and outside storage visible from public areas, can be detrimental to attracting new businesses to an area. DRAFT RTl4 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Another important factor to successful corporate park design is finding parcels of land large enough to accommodate a large-scale plan of development. Property owners interested in developing their land often find it is more profitable to group together a number of smaller adjacent parcels into one (1) significant holding. When the market is right, this approach can attract quality, large-scale corporate park development and discourage the piecemeal commercial "stripping" of development along major highways. Where practical and appropriate, the design of commercial uses can incorporate elements from nearby historic buildings, creating a common area theme that helps contribute to community continuity. Effective design also takes into consideration adjacent land character types. DRAFT RTl 5 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan A PLAN FOR ACTION k Goals The vision of the Route 288 Corridor Plan is to effectively guide future development in a way that promotes maximum benefit to Chesterfield County's current and future citizens, while recognizing the importance of property rights, healthy neighborhoods, environmental preservation and the County's high quality of life. The goals listed below foster this vision and establish a framework for the Plan's more specific recommendations. A. Basic Principles 1. Recognize the prime importance of the Route 288 Corridor to Chesterfield County's economic future. 2. Take advantage of the benefits to Chesterfield County that Route 288 will have as a primary component of the region's transportation system. 3. Chart a future for the area that takes into account both the interests of the current community and the long-term welfare of all Chesterfield citizens. B. Orderly Growth 1. Guide each type of development to the most appropriate area by following the County's Comprehensive Plan. 2. Discourage development that may be detrimental to long-term economic and environmental goals. 3. Minimize the cost of public facilities by promoting orderly and efficient development. 4. Only approve development proposals supported by public utilities. C. Transportation 1. Provide a safe, efficient and cost-effective transportation system. 2. Control development densities within the Corridor so that smooth fiow of traffic is provided on Route 288 and on major artedal and collector streets. 3. Provide for the construction of additional major arterial and collector streets as development occurs to mitigate the increase in traffic generated by development in the Corridor. 4. Properly locate and limit the number of access points to major arterial and collector streets. 5. Encourage pedestrian activity at appropriate locations in the Corridor. D. Economic Opportunities 1. Maximize the economic development potential of the Route 288 Corridor as a prime location for basic sector employment, such as corporate office and light industrial uses. 2. Take advantage of the potential for spin-off economic development from other major employment centers in the region, especially those opportunities for high-tech industry and corporate office centers. 3. Work to provide more basic sector jobs closer to the population centers in northern Chesterfield County. 4. Identify large parcels that are suitable for industrial development. 5. Protect sites identified for industrial use from encroaching residential and retail development. 6. Identify and market parcels appropriate for economic development. E. Resource Protection 1. Maintain the environmental quality of the area. D RAFT RT 16 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan 2. Protect water quality in the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir watershed, as well as in the area's perennial and non-perennial streams. 3. Encourage development to accommodate and preserve existing landscape where possible. 4. Protect historic resources in the area by promoting historic designation of identified structures and encouraging development to preserve historic structures. F. Housing 1. Promote housing development that will meet the needs of future residents and businesses. 2. Where residential development is appropriate, strive for a mix of housing options that will complement the County's economic development initiatives. G. Community Character and Design 1. Enhance the aesthetic quality of the area through quality design. 2. Encourage public safety through the effective design of development. 3. Encourage development design that promotes community character. II. Recommendations The following recommendations are the specific actions required to carry out the Route 288 Corridor Plan. These recommendations, combined with the land use plan that follows, will help guide the future of the Route 288 Corridor area. However, these recommendations will require cooperation between businesses, industries, residents and government to make them successful. A. Land Use 1. Land Use Plan: Follow the land use recommendations of the Route 288 Corridor Plan to guide future decision making. Aggregation: Through the zoning process, encourage owners interested in selling smaller land parcels in the Route 288 Corridor to join with adjacent property owners to aggregate land holdings large enough to accommodate a large-scale plan of development. Incompatible Uses: Residential land uses should be discouraged in areas designated for non- residential areas in this Plat1 (areas designated for light industrial, office or commercial land uses) and vice versa, except where those uses are permitted by right. B. Quality Design Large-Scale Development: Encourage large-scale development projects of quality design which follow an office park-planned development approach (i.e., Arboretum, Moorefield, Boulders). These projects should also include an internal road network and controlled access. Design Standards: Adopt amendments to the County's Design Standards Manual creating an oveday district for the Route 288 Corridor Plan area in all Regional Employment Center land use areas (see Map F) which would: a) Increase landscaping required in front and comer setbacks for new development. b) Require curb and gutter in all new developments. c) Allow building heights of up to 150 feet. d) Require new development adjacent to Route 288 to orient buildings so that the views of buildings from Route 288 will not be of loading docks, storage areas, etc. e) Require developers to design attractive wet ponds for Best Management Practices (BMPs) that can be incorporated into developments as amenities. DRAFT RTl 7 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan f) Enhance requirements for quality architecture. g) Require developments in I-2 Districts to pave their parking lots. h) Limit outdoor storage uses in I-2 Districts. i) Encourage pedestrian access in and around projects and a plan for linking pedestrian access to adjacent properties. 3. Safety: All development proposals should be designed to accommodate public safety needs. Urban Design: The area closest to the Route 288~60 interchange may be appropriate for an urban or neo-traditional scaled and designed development. This concept may include reduced setbacks, formal landscaping, pedestrian access, superior architectural design and other features that are representative of this urban or neo-traditional design. A quality development of this type could be submitted and processed through the County's CUPD (Conditional Use Planned Development) process. C. Economic Growth Proactive Zoning: Because of the economic development opportunities available in this area, not present in other areas of the County, there may be situations where the County would like to encourage development. Additional study of proactive rezoning should be conducted following the adoption of The Route 288 Corridor Plan. 2. Opportunity: The Department of Economic Development should continue to identify prime sites in the area and pursue proven developers to build quality office and business parks. Jobs: The Department of Economic Development should determine which types of economic activities (i.e., corporate and divisional headquarters, research and development, light manufacturing, distribution, back office operations, office/office showroom, etc.) will create the best job opportunities (payroll) for County citizens and generate significant tax revenues to Chesterfield County and pursue those uses for the Route 288 planning area. o Marketing: The Economic Development Department should develop and implement a marketing plan to capitalize on location advantages of the Route 288 Corridor, such as its proximity to workers, John Tyler Community College, major roads and Motorola's West Creek Campus. D. Public Facilities Utilities Study: A detailed utilities study should be undertaken to address possible demand/capacity issues, if uses are pursued that are more intense than those reflected by the Plan. 2. Water/Wastewater Ordinance: The County should adopt an Ordinance for this area requiring mandatory hook-up to County water and wastewater at the time of development. 3. Policing Office: As the surrounding communities grow and develop, an appropriate location for a policing office should be identified and permitted in a central, strategic location. 4. Fire/Rescue Facility: A fire/rescue station is planned within the area of Midlothian Turnpike and Route 288 to meet the existing and future demands for service and response time standards. E. Transportation Thorouo_hfare Plarl: Amend the County's Thoroughfare Plan in the Route 288 Corridor, as shown on Map F, and use the amended Plan as the guide for transportation recommendations on development proposals. DRAFT RTl 8 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Mitigating Road Improvements: Development proposals within the Corridor should provide mitigating road improvements, to include right-of-way dedication, construction of turn lanes, installation of traffic signalization and shoulder improvements. Access to Arterial and Collector Roads: Through the zoning, site plan review and subdivision review processes, control access to major arterial and collector roads through shared access, adequate access separation and traffic control devices to maintain orderly and efficient traffic flow. 4. Traffic Noise Abatement: Provide setbacks for future sound-sensitive land uses, such as residential development along Route 288, to reduce traffic noise impacts. 5. Pedestrian Access: Develop a network of sidewalks, in accordance with the County's Sidewalk Policy, to provide for pedestrian travel. Route 288 Funding: The funds that have been allocated for the Route 288 project will provide a four (4) lane facility between Powhite Parkway and Midlothian Turnpike and a two (2) lane facility north of Midlothian Turnpike. The County should aggressively pursue completion of Route 288. F. Environmental Resources Vegetation: Through the zoning process, encourage developers to disturb as little landscape and plant life as possible around the entrances and fringes of the project area and bodies of water to preserve the area's environmental character and the natural erosion and pollutant controls provided by the undisturbed vegetation. Upper Swift Creek Ordinance: Review and consider the following in conjunction with the Watershed Management Plan and Maintenance Program for the Swift Creek Reservoir: a) Restrict reductions in the pre-established Resource Protection Area (RPA) boundaries. b) Prohibit tree removal, clearing or filling in the 100 year floodplain adjacent to perennial and intermittent streams. c) Limit clearing and construction on slopes greater than 20 percent within, or contiguous to, Resource Protection Areas (RPAs). Regional BMPs: If development does take place on a site that i.s expected to be served by a regional BMP facility, staff will assist the developer in identifying a regional site and will attempt to facilitate discussions among the developer and other landowners for a regional facility. However, staff will not require a regional facility unless the developer and other landowners agree on a voluntary regional approach. If such an agreement is not reached, the developer will be required to provide a BMP facility for his own site. New Development Prior to the Regional BMP Master Plan: New development that takes place pdor to the adoption of the Regional BMP Master Plan (Watershed Master Plan and Maintenance Program) currently being developed for the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed must be encouraged to construct regional BMP facilities where there are technically feasible sites and the County should take reasonable steps and actions to protect and promote those sites. When the BMP Master Plan is adopted, new development must comply with the BMP Master Plan. The County should adopt the BMP Master Plan as soon as possible. Future Water Quality Technologies: For rezoning requests in the Upper Swift Creek watershed portion of The Route 288 Corridor Plan area, developers should be encouraged, through the use of voluntary proffers, to conform to possible future water quality protection measures and/or technologies. DRAFT RTl9 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan G. Housing and Community 1. Housing Types: Evaluate whether revisions to the County's residential zoning ordinances would encourage a mix of housing options for new workers, complementing the County's economic development initiatives. H. Historic Resources 1. Preserve Structures: Bethel Baptist Church and Hatlsborough Tavern, historic structures, should be preserved. Any adjacent development is encouraged to be architecturally compatible. Historic Area: Create an area around Bethel Baptist Church and Hallsborough Tavern, as shown on Map F. Any development in this area is encouraged to incorporate the design characteristics of these historic structures to preserve the historic character of the area. The goal of this area is to maintain the sense of place at this intersection created by Hallsborough Tavern and Bethel Baptist Church: a) On the north side of Midlothian Turnpike, development is encouraged to incorporate design features from the existing historic properties, including building scale, amhitectural design and texture. Further, development in this area is encouraged to incorporate pedestrian access and sidewalks. b) On the south side of Midlothian Turnpike, properties adjacent to Midlothian Turnpike are encouraged to be similar in scale and architecture to Hallsborough Tavern and Chapel Hill. Development in the remainder of this portion of the historic district may be larger in scale but not overwhelming to the smaller-scale development. Historic Designations: The Chesterfield County Preservation Committee should work with the property owners of Bethel Baptist Church and Chapel Hill to have these properties designated as County historic landmarks. Historic and Cultural Significance: The Chesterfield County Preservation Committee should recognize Mount Sinai Baptist Church and Cemetery for their historic and cultural significance to the County, including a plaque at the site explaining the story and significance of the church and initiate steps to designate it as a historic landmark. III. The Land Use Plan The land use plan for the Route 288 Corridor is a guide for future change. The land use plan illustrates the recommended future development pattern for the Route 288 Corridor area (see Map F). This map will be a useful guide for the future land use and rezoning decisions. Land use categories, their definitions and key features of recommended uses are presented in Chart 3. Successfully implemented, this land use plan will: Target key land in the northwestern part of Chesterfield County for office, light industrial and corporate park uses; in turn, strengthening the County's tax base and providing new employment opportunities. Promote a land use development pattern that takes best advantage of Route 288's links to the region's transportation system while, at the same time, providing effective transition between new uses and adjacent communities. In the portion of The Route 288 Corridor Plan area that drains to the Swift Creek Reservoir, maintain the current in-lake phosphorous limit and the reduced phosphorous standard for new residential development, as outlined in the County's 1997 Watershed Management Plar]. DRAFT RT20 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan The land use plan offers guidance to County staff, elected officials and citizens as new development proposals are brought forward and evaluated. For example, if a landowner is interested in developing his vacant property, which is currently zoned for Agricultural (A) uses, the land use plan will be consulted by staff as they determine their recommendation for the rezoning. If the rezoning request does not comply with the land use designation on the land use plan, staff is not likely to recommend approval of the request. Generally, the land use plan does not recommend changes to the zoning of any land. However, as outlined in the land use recommendations, if the Board of Supervisors chooses to rezone property in this area, this land use plan will be used as a guide. D PA, FT RT21 2/23/99 \% THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Chart 3 LAND USE CATEGORIES The categories shown on Map F are described below. Because land use plans are a general guide for recommended future growth, ail uses that could possibly be developed cannot be listed here. More detailed information on potential uses can be found in the corresponding categories (i.e., 0-2) of the Chesterfield County Zoning Ordinance. · Residential (One (1) dwelling or less per acre): Residences, and under certain circumstances, places of worship, schools, parks and other similar public facilities. · Residential (One (1) to two and a half (2 1/2) dwellings per acre): Residences, and under certain circumstances, places of worship, public schools, parks and other similar public facilities. · Office/Residential Mixed Use: Professional and administrative offices (0-2), residential developments of varying densities, and light industry (I-1). Under certain circumstances, supporting small-scale, retail uses may be incorporated into a larger development. · Office: Professional and administrative offices (0-2). Under certain circumstances, supporting small-scale, retail uses may be incorporated into a larger development. · Convenience Commercial (not shown on Plan): Limited retail, service and office uses (C-1 and O-1) mainly serving nearby neighborhoods or rural locations, generally located at the intersection of through streets (the intersection of two (2) collectors or a collector and an arterial as designated in the Thoroughfare PlCn), provided adequate spacing is provided. In developing areas, they should be planned in conjunction with new residential projects. · Neighborhood Mixed Use: Neighborhood-oriented commercial uses (C-2), including small shopping centers. · Light Industrial/Flex: Offices, warehouses and light industrial uses (I-1 and some I-2 uses), including research and development uses as well as flex space. Under certain circumstances, supporting small-scale, retail uses may be incorporated into a larger development. · Regional Employment Center: Office, research and development uses, warehouses and light industrial uses (I-1). Moderate industrial uses may be appropriate in some locations if appropriate access, buffering and land use transitions are provided. Under certain circumstances, supporting ......... s.m..al!-.s.c .al.e, .re. t.a!l .u.s.e.s.m..ay..b.e.i.n .co. r.p.o.r .at.e.d.i.n!o..a.la. r.g.e.r .d.e.v.el.o.p.m.e.n.t: ................... Midlothian Area Community_ Land Use And Transportation Plan: The shaded area on Map F shows recommended land uses from this Plan, as adopted in 1989 and amended in 1992. It is shown here for information purposes only and is not recommended for revision. · Residential Medium Density (1.01 to 2.5 units/acre): Housing types will be predominantly single family detached units and may also include schools and playgrounds, places of worship and isolated neighborhood service uses. · Planned Transition Area: This area is appropriate for mixed-use development that contributes to an overall transition to a smaller-scale, pedestrian-oriented environment in Midlothian Village. Pdmary uses will include office, medium-density housing (7-14 units/acre), personal services and community facilities. · Suburban Commercial District: Suburban, auto-oriented design district to include retail shopping centers, office-service establishments and similar uses. Note 1: The existing single family residential uses should be maintained and protected until appropriate redevelopment occurs in compliance with the recommended regional employment center land use designation. Zoning standards and proffers shall be used to protect the residential character until the property owners develop this area for the planned land uses. See Appendix B for the properties covered by this note. Note 2: A regional scale high fashion mall or lifestyle center can be appropriate at this quadrant if: · integrated with the regional employment center uses, · the majority of the anchor stores serve a metropolitan-wide market. Neighborhood retail uses may be appropriate if integrated with the other designated uses. DRAFT RT22 ?J23/99 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Appendix A PREPAREB FOR: PREPARED BY: DATE: Kramer Model Update for 1-288 Corridor Changes loan Salvati/C"nesrerfieid Counn' Andrea Ryon/CH2M HILL Fernando Pasquel / CI-12M HILL March 3, 1998 In 1994, Mary. Kramer, a member of the Chesterfield County Watershed .Management Committee, developed a spreadsheet model (K. ramer model) to evaluate the imp,acts of development within the Upper Swift Creek watershed on water quali .ty in Swift Creek Reservoir. The purpose of Mrs. Kramer's modeling effort was to evaluate ff a phosphorus export goal of 0.2 lb/ac/yr from new residential land uses and 0.45 lb/acre/yr from new nom'esidential land uses was sufficient to prevent m-lake vhosvhorus concentrations/rom exceeding 0.05 rog/L, a level considered suitabie to controlling eutrophicanon in the reservoir. For existing land uses, watershed pollutant loading factors from two different sources were used: Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed study (CDM, 1989) and CBLAD's factors listed in the Chesterfield Counw Calculation Procedures Manual. The empirical Reckhow relationship for southeastern U.S. reservoirs was used to estimate the median summer in- lake total phosphorus concentration. Mrs. Kramer analyzed six different scenarios · existing land use · zone(i land use · proposed land use (zoning plus additional proposed projects} · proposed land use with remainder of County buik out with 5 acre residennal lots · proposed land use with remainder of Counn' buiit our with 1 acre residential lots · proposed land use with remainder of County built out with 0.5 acre residential lots Since the Kramer model was developed, zoning changes within the 1-288 corridor have been proposed. Because these changes include shifts from residential uses to non-residential uses, total phosphorus loads calculated m the Kramer model would be expected to increase with the new land uses. To evaluate these changes, the model was re-run with the proposed 1-288 corridor land use changes. A meeting was held with Planning Department, Department o£ Environmental Engineering, Economic Development Department and CH2M HILL staff to identify, the differences between the land uses in the existing Kramer model and the proposed Iand uses in the 1-288 corridor. The modifications to the model required to reflect the new 1-288 corridor land uses are summarized in Table 1. WOCdO30398~J2OC ~31400 ~ ~q.*l '~m~:DATE FCR J-2~8 CCRRIDOR CHANGES TABLE 1 - CHANGES IN LAND USE BETWEEN KRAMER MODEL AND PROPOSED 1-288 CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT Subtract Add 300 acre Watkins commercial Drol~er[y 1408 acres moaerate indusmal lana use 300 acre commercial deveioDment along P, ou[e 60 420 acres light industrial land use 1882 acres of 2.2 du/ac reszaentlat area 454 m~xed use land use Equivalent Changes for Residential and Nonresidential Land Uses Subtract J Add 800 acres ncnremdential aha 1882 acres of res~dentlat I 2282 acres of nonresidentim These modifications were made to the model in order to evaluate the impact on phosphorus loads. The change was applied to the following 4 cases: · proposed land use (zoning plus additional proposed projects) · proposed land use with remainder of County built out with 5 acre residential lots · proposed land use with remainder of County built out with 1 acre residential lots · proposed land use with remainder of County built out with 0.5 acre residential lots The total phosphorus loads and the resuidn§ phosphorus concentration in the reservoir are sho~vn in Table 2 for the ori§imal Kramer model and for the modified model. In addition, the % differences bet-ween the original calculations and the modified calculations are shown. TABLE 2 · MODEL RESULTS FOR ORIGINAL AND MODIFIED MODEL Proposed Proposed with Proposed with Proposed with 5-acre build-out 1-acre build-out 0.5-acre build-out Loading factors based on 1989 Swift Creek Reservoir Waterst~ed Study Waterstned Phosphorus load (Ib/yr) Original model 10,525 16,801 16,221 16,221 Modified model 10,912 17,188 16,608 16,608 % change 3.7 2.3 2.4 2.4 Phosphorus concentration in reservoir !rng/L) Odginal model 0.039 Modified model 0.040 % change 2.3 0.056 0.051 0.049 0.056 0.052 0.050 1.4 1.5 1.5 Loading Factors based on CBLAD Watershed Phosphorus Load~ (Iblyr) Original model 8,992 Modified model 9,379 % change 4.3 14,254 14,254 14,254 14,641 14,641 14,641 2.7 2.7 2.7 Phosphorus concentration in reservoir (mgtL) Original model 0.039 0.055 Modified model 0.040 0.055 % change 2.6 1.6 0.050 0.049 0.051 0.050 1.7 3.1 ,'vocJ030398~ 2 For the proposed zoning condition, zonm~ mod:ficanons in the i-288 corridor increase the annual phosphorus load to the reservoir approxunately 4 %. This change increases the calculated phosphorus concentration un the reservoir from 0.039 m§/L to 0.040 m§/L, an increase of 2.3 - 2.6 percent, which is approximately 80% of the 0.05 mg/L §oal. For the three build-out conditions, the calculated in-lake phosphorus concentrations were near or above 0.05 m§/L for the ong-inai Kramer model. The modifications increased these estimated concentrations between 1 to 3 %. ',VOC,'O30398~E.DOC 3 Appendix B C:) 0 0 ~--I CZ) 0 0 0 0 ~0 04 0 O~ c.J 0 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route ?88 Corridor Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The newest gateway into Chesterfield County, the Route 288 Corridor, will provide unmatched economic development potential for northwestern Chesterfield. Currently, this area mainly contains agricultural uses and vacant land. Over the next several years, with effective planning and the support of local property owners and citizens, this area can become one of the region's premier office and light industrial employment centers. Important Issues addressed in the Route 288 Corridor planning effort include: · Recognizing the key strategic location of the Route 288 Corridor for future economic development in northwestern Chesterfield County. · Updating the County's Thorou.qhfare Plan to reflect the road network necessary to serve future development in this area. · Maintaining the health of the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir as a drinking water source for County residents. · Attracting high quality economic development proposals to the area. · Providing adequate public facilities to address the impact of new development. Key Findings include: · Vacant Land: The area is largely undeveloped and zoned for agriculture at this time, with only three subdivisions and a few other residences scattered throughout the study area. · Potential for Change: With the construction of Route 288, the area will see tremendous change over the next several years, from development of infrastructure to the development of new office parks and light industrial uses. · Swift Creek Reservoir: Chesterfield Ooun~y is committed to pratectin,q and preservinq the water quality of the Swift Creek Reservoir. Study is on-,qoin,q as to how the develapment of the Route 28~ Corridor will impact the Reservoir, and the measures necessary to protect the Reservoir. · Public Facilities: There are limited public facilities and utilities in the area. As development occurs, public utilities will have to be constructed by the developers. · Historic Resources: There are four (4) historic resources in the study area; only one (1) of them, Hallsborough Tavern, is designated as a County historic landmark. All four (4) are in good condition. · Emerging Opportunities: This area, due to its proximity to an excellent transportation network, regional employment centers and a well educated work force, is poised to become another regional employment center. Major Recommendations of The Plan: · Provide land uses that maximize economic development opportunities in the area for the future of the County and the region. · Adopt standards to increase the quality of development required in this area. · Promote ongoing efforts to protect water quality in the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir and its tributary streams. DRAFT 4/22./99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Adopt an ordinance that will require new development to utilize public water and sewer. Create a historic area around Hallsborough Tavern and Bethel Baptist Church that will protect these structures for the future. DRAFT RT25 4/22/e9 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Table Of Contents Introduction The Citizen Participation Process Existing Conditions and Important Issues Emerging Opportunities A Plan For Action Goals Recommendations The Land Use Plan Page RT 1 RT 2 RT 3 RT 13 RT 16 RT 17 RT 20 Map A B C D E F List of Maps Base Map Approved Area Developments Existing Generalized Land Use Historic Resources Character Type Map The Route 288 Corridor Land Use and Thorouqhfare Plans Follows Page RT 1 RT 4 RT 5 RT 10 RT 12 RT 21 DRAFT 4/22J99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan INTRODUCTION The Route 288 Corridor Plan area (as shown on Map A), located in northwest Chesterfield County, is an area that is currently used primarily for agriculture, large lot residences or vacant land. With the construction of Route 288, many changes will occur in the area. Route 288 will bring regional access, connecting western Chesterfield with Powhatan, Goochland and Henrico and providing opportunities for the entire County. Route 288's importance to the region is vital. The limited access highway will connect to Powhite Parkway, extend through Chesterfield, with new interchanges at Lucks Lane/Center Pointe Parkway, Woolridge Road Extended and Midlothian Turnpike. It will go through Powhatan County, cross the James River, connecting with the West Creek development in Goochland County and Interstate 64. Chesterfield County residents and businesses will then have direct access to Goochland and western Henrico County. This access will provide additional opportunities for economic development in the Route 288 Corridor area that were not present previously. Development that occurs as a result of Route 288 must be guided to ensure that full advantage is taken of this unique opportunity for Chesterfield. This area is an important part of Chesterfield County's economic future. This Plan seeks to maximize the opportunities presented by the construction of Route 288, providing a guide for positive development of the area. How This Plan Works The Route 288 Corridor Plan, once adopted by the Board of Supervisors, will become part of The Plan for Chesterfield, the County's comprehensive plan. The Plan for Chesterfield is used by County citizens, staff, the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors as a guide for future decisions in the County, including, but not limited to, decisions regarding future land use, road networks and rezonings. Once The Route 288 Corridor Plan is adopted, it will replace parts of The Upper Swift Creek Plan (1991) and The Midlothian Community Plan (1989). The adoption of The Route 288 Corridor Plan will not, however, change any of the current ordinance requirements adopted to protect water quality in the Upper Swift Creek watershed. The Route 288 Corridor Plan makes no recommendations to change land uses in The Midlothian Community Plan, but there are proposed amendments to the County's Thorouqhfare Plan within The Midlothian Community Plan area that are recommended. A Plan for Action The following main components are found in The Route 288 Corridor Plan: · Existing Conditions and Important Issues: This information forms the factual basis for the goals, recommendations and implementation strategies found in the Plan. · Emerging Opportunities: This section highlights changes that will be brought by Route 288 and the opportunities that are associated with its construction. · Goals: These are general statements about what is desirable for the future - what the Plan attempts to accomplish. · Recommendations: These are statements on ways to reach the goals and what actions should be taken to achieve them. · The Land Use and Transportation Plan: The Plan will be used as a guide for future development decisions. DRAFT RTl 4/22/99 ~ Bi II ~ Study Area Boundary No Scale Prepared by the Chestedietd County Planning Department November, 1998 Revised Draft (Map A) IRt.288 Corridor Plan / \ \ RD. THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS The Importance of Citizen Participation In order for any plan to stand the test of time, citizens must support it. Citizen support for a plan and its concepts is built through a process of citizen involvement where citizens' viewpoints, questions and concerns are considered and taken into account. This Plan seeks to build upon the interests of citizens in the County, present and future. Public Involvement To respond to the high level of citizen and community interest in this Plan, numerous meetings were held with citizens, community groups, property owners and individuals. A mailing list was maintained of all property owners in the area, as well as anyone who requested information about the Plan or attended any meetings about the Plan. At two (2) informational meetings held in Summer 1997, approximately 180 citizens attended to find out more about the planning process and the study area. Over the course of the next ten (10) months, approximately twenty (20) smaller meetings were held with interested citizens to keep them informed about the planning process. In June 1998, the concepts of the Plan were reviewed with citizens for their input at four (4) public meetings, with a total attendance of approximately 200 people. Citizens shared ideas with staff throughout the planning process and offered staff suggestions to make this Plan one that will be successful in the future. The Route 288 Corridor Plan's successful implementation will be a joint effort by the County and community. DRAFT RT2 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS AND IMPORTANT ISSUES Extensive analysis of existing conditions in the Route 288 Corridor planning area, including valuable information generated through the citizen participation process, forms the foundation for identifying key planning issues and factors. Information about the Route 288 Corridor was gathered from many sources, including field surveys and County records. An understanding of the characteristics and trends that influence development potential in the area provides a sound basis for planning and policy decisions that will shape the Route 288 Corridor's future. Key findings from the research include: · The majority of the land in the planning area is currently vacant or held in large agricultural or residential parcels; · Numerous proposed large scale development projects are zoned in or near the planning area that could have a significant effect on future growth and traffic patterns; · The area has important environmental features, including the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir watershed, streams and wetlands. Demographic and Economic Information Demographic and economic information was obtained from 1990 U. S. Census data. The data was updated where possible by using field surveys conducted by the Chesterfield County Planning Department to determine the number and type of houses in the area. Estimates of population were then based on the observed number of houses multiplied by the number of persons per household in 1990. · Population: The population of the planning area in 1997 was approximately 1,040 people, .4 percent of the 1997 Planning Department's County-wide estimate of 250,000. Income and Unemployment: 1990 Census data shows unemployment in the planning area was 2 percent, below the County-wide figure of 3.3 percent. The estimated 1990 median household income of the planning area was $66,535, above Chesterfleld's $43,604. The poverty level was 2.7 percent compared to the County's 6 percent. Study Area Countywide 0% Chart 1 Home Ownership Comparisons 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% [] Owner I Source: Chesterfield County Planning Department/U.S. Census (1990) · Community: The community is very stable as the area is rural and has seen slow growth. Chart 1 shows that 96 percent of the planning area's residences are owner-occupied. Land Use The Route 288 Corridor planning area consists mostly of agricultural uses and vacant land. Land use data was gathered from an existing database of County real estate tax records and field surveys. There DRAFT RT3 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan are 526 parcels in the planning area. The combined area of those parcels is approximately 6,943 acres; 2.4 percent of Chesterfield County's 285,702 total acres. Large Tracts: There are thirty-three (33) parcels that each exceed fifty (50) acres, and combined account for about 5,022 acres or 72 percent of the planning area's acreage. Approximately 67 percent of these parcels are zoned for agriculture and approximately 72 percent are currently vacant or used for agriculture. These tracts are located throughout the area and present opportunities for future large scale development projects. Existing Zoning: The zoning of property determines the uses that are allowed on that land. For example, property that is zoned for residential land uses will have a zoning category that begins with R. The number following the R represents the required lot size for the category (R-7 requires a minimum 7,000 square foot lot, R-9 requires a minimum 9,000 square foot lot and so on). Agricultural (A) zoning allows large lot residential uses and farm uses. It may also be the zoning category for land that has not yet been zoned to another category for development. Table 1 shows a breakdown of zoning categories for the Route 288 planning area. As shown in the table, the majority of the land in the planning area is currently zoned A. The few office and commercially zoned areas are primarily Table 1 Zoning Analysis Percentages given are rounded. Zoning Acres Pct. A (Agricultural) 4,900 71% R-7 (Residential) 481 7% R-9 921 13% R-15 177 3% R-25 33 0% 0-2 (Office) 149 2% C-2 (Commercial) 3 0% C-3 75 1% I-1 (Light Industry) 204 3% Rt. 288 Study Area 6,943 100% Source: Chesterfield County Planning Department located along Midlothian Turnpike with a concentration just before the Powhatan County line. Most of the industrial zoning is in the Sommerville development located on Midlothian Turnpike. IsB Table 2 Approved Future/Adjacent Developments ecause most of the existing zoning in this area was zoned through a Conditional Use Planned Development, pecific uses allowed may not be reflected through the underlying zoning category. Name Acropolis 69 CenterPointe 947 Charter Colony 822 Greensprings 1,313 The Grove 440 Sommerville 140 Waterford 243 Zoning and Acreage per Category 0-2 R-7 (330.7), R-15 (18.8), R-MFfTH (91), C-3 (41), O-2 (400) R-9 (770.5), R-15 (115.9) C-3 (3.6) R-9 (1044.7), O-2 (268) R-9 (102.5), R-12 (132.8), R-TH (60.1), R-MF (21.3), 0-2 (16.6), C-3 (56.7) I-1 I-1 (190.5), R-MF (31), C-t (21.5) Comment Mixed -Use development allowing office and commercial uses. Mixed-Use development allowing residential, office and commercial uses. Mixed-Use development allowing residential, office, and commercial uses. This development also includes the Midlothian campus of John Tyler Community College. Mixed-Use development allowing residential, office and commercial uses. Mixed-Use development allowing residential, office, commercial, outdoor recreational, and public/semi-public uses. Mixed-Use development allowing residential, office, light industrial and commercial uses. Mixed-Use development allowing office, light industrial, and limited commercial uses. Source: Chesterfield County Planning Department Approved Area Developments: There are seven (7) major approved developments in, or immediately adjacent to, the planning area and near the proposed extension of Route 288 (see Map B). These seven (7) developments are Acropolis, CenterPointe, Charter Colony, Greensprings, The DRAFT RT4 4/22/99 Watkins Nurseries I.'''1 \ I Note: The boundaries shown are approximate and for general reference only. Revised Draft (Map B) APPROVED AREA DEVELOPMENTS Ivymont Square Charter Charter C John Tyler Community College Charter Colony Midlothian Vi'llage NPIKE Prepared by the . Chesterfield County ~NT ~'~-e,~ ~-- - Planning Department A November. 1998 No Scale ---- Brandermill -,· Queensmill THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Grove, Sommerviile and Waterford. All of these projects have seen limited development or have not begun to develop. Land Use Analysis This land use analysis reviewed the existing use of property in the Route 288 planning area in 1998 (see Map C). It does not analyze what the land is zoned or what the property is designated for in the future. Undeveloped and Agricultural Land: This category includes vacant land and agricultural uses as well as residential uses on parcels ten (10) acres or greater. It accounts for 200 parcels and 6,285 acres, approximately 90 percent of the total acreage in the planning area. These parcels vary in size and are located throughout the planning area. Most of Table 3 Existing Land Use Percentages given are rounded. Land Use Acres Percentage Undeveloped and 6,285 90% Agricultural Residential 445 6% Commercial 107 2% Industrial~Office 81 1% Public,Semi-Public 24 1% Total 6,943 100% Source: Chesterfield County Planning Department the land is zoned for agricultural or residential uses. Residential: This includes all parcels currently used for homes on less than ten (10) acres. Residential land uses comprise 445 acres (6.4 percent) of the planning area. Approximately one-third of the residences are scattered on agriculturally zoned parcels of less than ten (10) acres in size. The remaining are in residential neighborhoods. Currently there are three (3) neighborhoods in the area: Huguenot Ridge, located on Huguenot Springs Road; Buckingham Manor, on Otterdale Road; and Otterdale, also on Otterdale Road. Huguenot Ridge has thirty (30) approved lots, six (6) of which have been developed. Buckingham Manor has developed thirteen (13) of its eighteen (18) approved lots, while Otterdale Subdivision has developed 137 of its 140 approved lots. Commercial: Commercial uses account for approximately 1.5 percent of the planning area's land use (107 acres). These uses are located along Midlothian Turnpike. The primary commercial uses are Watkins Nursery and Windy Hill Sports Complex. Watkins Nursery grows and sells plants for landscaping purposes and plans to relocate before the construction of Route 288. Windy Hill Sports Complex is on the west-bound side of Midlothian Turnpike just past Huguenot Springs Road. The complex has batting cages, miniature golf, a driving range and has recently added a nine-hole golf course. Industrial: Industrial and office land uses account for 1.2 percent or eighty-one (81) acres of the planning area's uses. These uses include the Sommerville Industrial and Office Park and a Virginia Power substation on Dry Bridge Road, one-half mile south of Midlothian Turnpike. It has several high voltage transmission wires leading to it through several properties. · Public/Semi Public: See Public Facilities on page RT 7. Environmental Factors In guiding future land use decisions in the planning area, environmental features should be considered. Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed: The portion of the planning area south of Midlothian Turnpike is located in this 41,950 acre watershed and contains two (2) of the nine (9) major tributaries that drain to the Swift Creek Reservoir. Located west of Route 288 between Route 360 and Genito Road, the Swift Creek Reservoir covers 1,700 acres. One of Chesterfield County's three (3) principal water sources, it produces approximately eight (8) million gallons of drinking water per day for 30 percent of County citizens. The Reservoir also functions as a recreational and aesthetic resource for residents of DRAFT RT5 4/22/99 Draft rMap C) 288 Corridor Plan Existing Land Use Residential Commercial Industrial Public/Semi-Public Vacant/Agricultural ~,~ ~ ~,'; ~ Study Area. Boundary No Scale Prepared by the Chesterfield County Planr~i~g Depar~mem June, 1998 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan surrounding areas. At this time, the Reservoir's overall water quality is good. However, only a small portion of the Reservoir's watershed, approximately 12 percent, is developed. The remainder of the large watershed area has been recommended by County plans for significant future growth. Without adequate management, such growth could result in the generation of large amounts of nutrients and pollutants on the Reservoir. These could cause taste and odor problems in the treated water, excessive algae blooms and depleted oxygen levels, affecting fish and other aquatic organisms, the aesthetic value of the Reservoir and its viability as a drinking water supply. Further, nutrients and pollution in the Reservoir may have an economic impact as well. As water quality decreases, the cost of treatment can increase. To address all of these concerns, in 1997, the Board of Supervisors adopted a Watershed Manaqement Plan for the area. The Watershed Manaqement Plan includes an in-lake phosphorous limit and establishes measures such as a reduced phosphorous standard for new residential development and the construction of regional Best Management Practice(BMP) basins to filter pollutants to meet this limit. Watershed Standards and The Route 288 Corridor Plan: Early in the planning process, citizens expressed concern about the continued health of the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir. Their concerns focused on higher intensity uses that may be allowed as a result of this Plan. !r, crdcr to rc.spcr, d .......... , ............................................ = ......... = """*"""*"'~....,. c ccncultcnt ~" '~"~ ~''~"~'~ ~"~''~'~'~" ~' '~v~ ' ',,,,,,~,~,,,~,,,~,~ ~ ,.~,~ ~VO, ~,,~ The Environmental Enqineering Depa~ment has contracted with a consultant to update the land uses in the Water Quali~ model used by the Coun~ and the Count's Watershed Manaqement Commi~e~ to refiect the recommended tanO uses in lhe Route 288 Corridor Plan. In con~uncMon with citizens, the results of this study will be reviewed and may be implemented into The Route 288 Corridor Plan. Topography and Soils: The topography of the planning area consists principally of flatlands and rolling hills typical of the Piedmont physiographic region. Soils in the planning area can be characterized as moderately to well drained. There are some areas, however, that are characterized by clayey or hydric soils, which do not drain well. DRAFT RT6 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Existing Regulations to Protect the Reservoir: The Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, Upper Swift Creek, Floodplain and Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinances are the regulations that limit the amount of pollutants entering the Reservoir from both non-residential and residential growth. ,~,~ ~ ~,~11, ,+,~f~ ;~ ~,~rm~.~f~r r, ,r~c ~t~,-~m ~t~1~,-~ I,~ Existing Regulations to Protect Streams: The two (2) measures to protect the streams are the County's Erosion and Sediment Control and Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act Ordinances. The first Ordinance limits the amount of sediment that is allowed to enter a stream during construction activities. The second Ordinance establishes Resource Protection Areas (RPAs) adjacent to perennial streams. The establishment of RPAs is intended to ensure an adequate buffer between environmental resources (such as wetlands and streams) and development. RPAs reduce and filter the pollutants in stormwater runoff. The RPA boundaries in the watershed were established by delineating an area measured from the limits of the 100 year floodplain where available or from the edge of hydric soils. As it is currently written, the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act Ordinance allows these RPA areas to be reduced by permitting the area to be "redelineated' by measuring the area from field-delineated wetlands rather than the floodplain. In most cases, these redelineations result in a reduction in the RPA, thus affording less protection for the streams. Further, 100 year floodplain areas adjacent to non-perennial streams can be cleared. Public Facilities Facilities: There are no parks, schools, fire or rescue stations currently located in the planning area boundaries. However, the County's 1995 Public Facilities Plan recommends construction of an elementary school in the southeastern part of the planning area by the year 2015. A community park and a fire station are also planned within the planning area. John Tyler Community College: John Tyler Community College-Northern Branch will be located in the southwestern quadrant of the intersection of Charter Colony Parkway and Woolridge Road Extended. Public Water/Wastewater Systems Existing Water and Wastewater Systems: The use of public water and wastewater systems is currently recommended for ail development within The Upper Swift Creek Plan. Provisions of the County Code and conditions of zoning, tentative subdivision and/or site plan approval may require the use of public systems. Due to the variability of construction costs and other factors, specific water and wastewater line extensions needed for future development should be discussed far in advance with the Utilities Department. Information relating to water and wastewater infrastructure may be found in The Water and Wastewater Facilities Plan. The planning area is served by several large water mains, a twenty-four (24) inch line along Midlothian Turnpike (Route 60) and a twenty-four (24) inch line along Coalfield Road. The area is DRAFT RT7 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan also served by an existing water tank at Huguenot Springs Road. That portion of the planning area located south of Midlothian Turnpike is served by a sixty (60) inch wastewater trunk along Genito Road, the Upper Swift Creek wastewater pumping station and the Bailey's Bridge pumping station. An eighteen (18) to twenty-seven (27) inch wastewater trunk along Little Tomahawk Creek has been extended to serve the John Tyler Community College-Northern Campus and adjacent properties. That portion of the planning area located north of Midlothian Turnpike is served by a twenty-one (21) to thirty (30) inch wastewater trunk along Michaux Creek and by the Michaux Creek wastewater pumping station. These two (2) facilities are supported by a thirty/thirty-six (30~36) inch wastewater trunk located along the James River. That area of the Plan bordered by Midlothian Turnpike, Huguenot Springs Road and the Chesterfleld/Powhatan County line cannot be served by a direct gravity line extension from the Michaux Creek system. The topography of this area dictates that it naturally drains west toward Powhatan County and would require the construction of a small pumping station to access the public wastewater system. Existing facilities are sized to provide capacity consistent with those land uses reflected in the Plan. Should more intense land uses be pursued which would be considered heavy water users and wastewater generators, detailed analyses may be necessary to address impact on the existing public water and wastewater systems. Future Water and Wastewater Systems: The County's long-standing policy "Growth Pays For Growth," as reflected in the County's Upper Swift Creek Plan is applicable in the Route 288 Corridor planning area as well. Unless the construction of a new facility is undertaken by the County (including upgrading of pumping stations and construction of water tanks) to address system reliability or water quality concerns, the majority of future water and wastewater facilities depicted on the County's Water and Wastewater Facilities Plan are anticipated to be constructed by private development interests. Current County policies may provide some rebating of construction costs to developers for off-site extensions and line over-sizing. Development within the planning area will require the extension of major water mains as well as smaller lines to serve specific sites..Mcjcr ~; .......... ,~ ;,,,-',,,~-, ~;,,*~,, (Im ;,,,-~- ,,,-,, ~ .... *,, ~ ..... The extension of major wastewater trunks, as well as sub-trunks, and collector lines will be required for development within the planning area. Mcjcr *,. ~,,..~'"' ~,rc~.ccc_.d ,,,v._,~;""l'"~ .... -., ~.=.,,~,,;"~'*"-'- ,/~.~, ,,,~,,;--~- *'-,~ ~;;~,-,t'/ ~ The proposed new and expanded facilities are sized to meet the capacity requirements anticipated by those land uses reflected in the Plan. However, should more intense uses be pursued which would require much higher water demands and generate much higher levels of wastewater flows, detailed analyses may be necessary to address system capacity issues. These analyses would need to address the ability of current water sources and treatment plant sites to meet these potential higher demands and flows. DRAFT RT8 4122/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Transportation Existing Conditions: Much of the Route 288 Corridor is served by two-lane roads, such as Huguenot Springs Road, Otterdale Road, Old Hundred Road and Coalfield Road. Charter Colony Parkway, a new two- lane facility, was recently completed from the vicinity of Midlothian High School south to Coalfield Road. Midlothian Turnpike (Route 60) is the major East/West road in the Corridor and is a four-lane highway with a median. Traffic signals are located at its intersections with Old Hundred Road and Otterdale Road. The following are average daily traffic volumes on some of the major roads in the corridor: Midlothian Turnpike, west of W interfield Road Charter Colony Parkway, south of Midlothian High School Coalfield Road between Queensmill and the YMCA Huguenot Springs Road Mount Hermon Road between Old Hundred and Hallsboro Roads Old Hundred Road between Dry Bridge and Otterdale Roads Otterdale Road between Midlothian Turnpike and Otterdale Road 23,465 (1997) 2,615 (1997) 15,370 (1997) 1,160 (1996) 340 (1996) 4,260 (1997) 2,150 (1997) Coalfield Road, which originates in the Village of Midlothian and is the primary north/south traffic carrying facility in the Corridor, is the only road that is currently operating at capacity. A Norfolk Southern rail-line runs east and west through the Corridor, south of and parallel to Midlothian Turnpike. According to the Virginia Department of Transportation's (VDOT's) Rail and Public Transportation section, this line carries two (2) trains per day. The design of Route 288 from the Powhite Parkway through the Corridor to the northern County line has been completed. Ultimately, Route 288 in the Corridor area will be a four (4) lane, interstate-style limited access facility with interchanges located at Lucks Lane/Centre Pointe Parkway, Woolridge Road Extended and Midlothian Turnpike. Collector/Distributor (C/D) roads will be provided throughout most of the Corridor. These CID roads will run parallel to the mainline lanes and will allow vehicles entering and exiting Route 288 to do so without interfering with mainline traffic. The initial phases of construction will result in a four (4) lane facility between Powhite Parkway and Midlothian Turnpike and a two (2) lane facility north of Midlothian Turnpike. Right-of-way acquisition is currently underway. First phase construction of the section between the Powhite Parkway and Midlothian Turnpike is scheduled to begin in the Fall of 1998. First phase construction of the section north of Midlothian Turnpike is scheduled for the Spring of 2000. In 1989, the Board of Supervisors adopted a County-wide Thorouqhfare Plan. Changes to the 1989 Thoroughfare Plan will be necessary due to the Route 288 project and approved development in the area. Other Road Projects In The Route 288 Corridor Area: In addition to Route 288, the following are other road projects in or adjacent to the Route 288 Corridor: Old Hundred Road - Between Dry Bridge Road and Otterdale Road, Old Hundred Road has narrow travel lanes and inadequate shoulders. This project will reconstruct two (2) lanes to provide adequate travel lane and shoulder widths and will improve vertical and horizontal alignments where necessary. Although this project is in the current Six Year Construction Plan, construction funds have not been allocated. DRAFT RT9 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan 2. Woolridqe Road Extended - A short section of Woolridge Road Extended has been completed connecting Charter Colony Parkway, south of Midlothian High School, with Coalfield Road at the YMCA. A further extension of Woolridge Road will connect Coalfield Road at the YMCA with Midlothian Turnpike, east of the Village of Midlothian, at the existing intersection of Midlothian Turnpike with Walton Park Road and Old Buckingham Road. When completed, this road will provide a southern Midlothian bypass and should divert a significant volume of traffic from the section of Midlothian Turnpike that passes through the Village of Midlothian. Construction is underway and should be completed by Fall 1999. 3. Charter Colony Parkway - To improve access to Midlothian High School and the future John Tyler Community College campus, westbound dual left-turn lanes and a traffic signal will be installed at the Midlothian Turnpike/Charter Colony Parkway intersection. Additional lanes will be constructed on Charter Colony Parkway, south of Midlothian Turnpike and across the frontage of Midlothian High School, to provide left-turn lanes at school entrances. Construction of this project is anticipated to begin in 1998. Historic Resources This area of Chesterfield County has many significant historical structures (see Map D). Most are still in use today and have been well preserved. Information on historic resources was taken from Jeffrey O'Delt's 1983 book, Chesterfield County: Early Architecture and Historfc Sites. The following list of historic sites includes all of those inventoried in the book which are still existing in the planning area. All of these structures are located near Midlothian Turnpike and are part of what was a small hamlet which centered around Hallsborough Tavern. Bethel Baptist Church (100 Huguenot Springs Road): This structure was erected in 1894 behind Hallsborough Tavern and is the only nineteenth century brick church in Chesterfield County. The building is a Gothic Revival structure with a steep, gable roof sheathed in slate. Chapel Hill (194 Huguenot Springs Road): Built in 1903 by Dr. W. D. Sydnor, this house is a central passage plan i-house featuring a front-cross gable, interior end brick chimneys and octagonal-roofed turrets. DRAFT RTl 0 4/22/99 Revised Draft (Map D) Rt. 288 Corridor Plan Bethel Baptist Church Chapel Hill Hallsboro Tavern Mt. Sinai Baptist Church & Cemetary ~ ~ ~ ,~ Study Area Boundary No Scale Prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department November, 1998 ! THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor P/an Hallsborough Tavern (16300 Midlothian Turnpike): This structure was originally built by James Howard around 1810 to serve as a tavern and retail store. The next owner, Austin Spears, added a two story wing in 1832 to accommodate guests. This structure eventually served as the area's post office. This building has been altered several times since its original construction. Currently, it is being used for retail purposes. Mount Sinai Baptist Church (200 Old Hundred Road): Erected in 1884, this was the first church built to serve the area's African-American community. Construction funds were raised from donations and festivals. The original structure underwent major remodeling in 1948 and again in 1969. Land Character Types Based on field surveys, information provided by County Departments, maps of existing land use, the location of significant water bodies and Chesapeake Bay Resource Protection Areas, a character type inventory of the planning area was conducted as a means of classifying land areas (see Map E). Four (4) character types depict the visual environment of the planning area. Below are the character types, their definitions and significance to the area. · Forested Description: Managed forests and natural wooded areas which include a mix of pine and hardwood. Significance: Forest land is significant both environmentally and aesthetically. Environmentally, forests protect the soil, produce oxygen, provide opportunities for recreation and play a role in a variety of natural environmental systems. Forested land contributes to the rural and natural "feel" of an area and may buffer different land uses from one another. · Agriculture and Open Space Description: Cropland, open fields, pastures and recreational areas. Significance: Agricultural land uses are particularly significant to the visual quality and ambiance of an area because of the seasonal changes and variety. The textures and colors of the open fields are particularly attractive from rural roadways, especially in areas with rolling terrain. · Residential Description: Subdivisions are a grouping of suburban type housing linked by a planned road network and are marked with an identifiable entrance. Strip residential development consists of homes located along roadways, generally fronting arterials and collectors in a linear configuration. D RAFT RTl 1 4/22_/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Significance: Although the planning area remains relatively undeveloped, consisting of only three (3) neighborhoods, growth is expected to occur in the next few years as the completion of Route 288 nears. Office, Commercial and Industrial Description: Most of these uses in the planning area, which includes Watkins Nursery, are rural, family-owned businesses or are buffered and blend in with the character of the surrounding area. The exception to this is the Virginia Power substation which is significantly screened from view by forested areas. Significance: Currently, these uses account for a very small portion of the development in the planning area. However, upon the completion of Route 288 and other transportation improvements, these types of uses are expected to increase and become dominant in the area. DRAFT RTl2 4/22/99 Revised Draft (Map E) 288 Corridor Plan Character Type Map Forested Ag ricultur~l/Oper~ Space Residential/Churches Office/Commercial.rind ust rial Study Ares Bound~r-y No Scale Prepared bythe Chesterfield County Planning Department January 11,1999 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan EMERGING OPPORTUNITIES The completion of Route 288 from the Powhite Parkway to Interstate 64 will greatly accelerate development activity in all of northwest Chesterfield County and throughout the region. Not only will this new highway open up access to a relatively undeveloped part of Chesterfield, it will provide a direct link across the James River to Goochland County's West Creek Business Park, home of the proposed Motorola semiconductor plant and western Henrico's business district. Effective planning in this area will assure that, as growth ,occurs, it is properly guided, taking advantage of a prime opportunity for needed economic development, while maintaining environmental preservation and the County's high quality of life. Chesterfield and The Metropolitan Region's Economy Chesterfield County has historically been a "bedroom community" for the Richmond metropolitan area, providing a greater proportion of places to live than places to work. This has a large fiscal impact on the County, since the cost of providing services to residential development is greater than what it pays the County in taxes (see Chart 2). Business revenue to the County provides most of the additional funds necessary to provide residential services. Therefore, a balance between economic development and $1,165 Chart 2 Share of Cost of County Services Per Chesterfield Household $642 · Taxes Paid by Household r'lTaxes Paid by Business · Other Sources $1,930 residential growth is important. Source: Chesterfield County Budget Department In 1997, the Chesterfield Planning Department analyzed the County's Comprehensive Plan to determine the number of acres that should be recommended for office and industrial use to meet long-range economic goals for the County. This analysis compared the County's existing share of the region's economic base and the amount of land recommended for office and industrial use in the County's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Using a moderate level growth forecast covering the period to 2044, the analysis identified a land use plan deficit of approximately 2,250 acres of land recommended for industry and 4,350 acres of land recommended for office use, totaling 6,600 additional acres necessary, but not yet designated for, office and industrial uses in the County's adopted Plans. Jobs and Location Chesterfield needs more businesses to balance residential growth and provide quality jobs for its citizens. Not all jobs are created equal; attracting "basic sector" jobs, like those associated with corporate offices and light industry, will be of greater benefit to the citizens of Chesterfield County. These jobs are higher paying, with better benefits, and generate spin-off employment in other economic sectors, such as retail and service. Quality jobs are especially important in the Route 288 Corridor planning area, as most of Chesterfield's workers live in the northwestern part of the County and most of Chesterfield's major employers are in the eastern part of Chesterfield. DRAFT RTl 3 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Timing of Development Typically, the demand for residential construction in highway corridors precedes the market for corporate office and light industrial uses. This area is anticipated to have residential demand due to the development of employment centers at West Creek ~ in Goochland, large employment centers in western Henrico and a scarcity of land designated for residential development in Goochland and Henrico. With the construction of Route 288, Chesterfield County will only be a short commute over the new James River bridge. There may also be interest in retail development along Midlothian Turnpike, as businesses consider the potential of attracting commuters from Route 288. However, commercial development is already developed nearby at Chesterfield Towne Center, with additional space already planned and zoned at the Route 288~360 interchange area and east and west of Midlothian Village. Planning and Design Issues The future design and configuration of development in the Route 288 corridor is critical to Chesterfield County. Well-planned and constructed development, consolidated and coordinated to the maximum extent possible, will promote a stronger tax base, an aesthetically pleasing environment and the cost effective provision of County services. Most quality1 large-scale suburban office and light industrial development in the Richmond region is found in "corporate parks," such as the Arboretum and the Boulders off Midlothian Turnpike in Chesterfield County, Innsbrook in Richmond's west end and the new West Creek Corporate Park in eastern Goochland County. Common to these developments are basic features that characterize good design and planning including generous landscaping, well designed entrances, use of curbs and gutters along streets, a mix of building heights, effective lighting and parking. Many of these corporate centers have their own strict development standards but, at the same time, incorporate enough flexibility to accommodate market demand. In many cases, a combination of local zoning requirements, improvements proffered by the center's developer at the time of rezoning and deed covenants established by the developer combine to ensure good design and planning. Well-designed corporate centers play an important part in the success of attracting desirable economic development in a regionally and nationally competitive environment. Haphazard and incremental commercial development, especially industrial uses characterized by prefabricated metal buildings, inadequate landscaping and outside storage visible from public areas, can be detrimental to attracting new businesses to an area. Another important factor to successful corporate park design is finding parcels of land large enough to accommodate a large-scale plan of development. Property owners interested in developing their land DRAFT RTl4 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan often find it is more profitable to group together a number of smaller adjacent parcels into one (1) significant holding. When the market is right, this approach can attract quality, large-scale corporate park development and discourage the piecemeal commercial "stripping" of development along major highways. Where practical and appropriate, the design of commercial uses can incorporate elements from nearby historic buildings, creating a common area theme that helps contribute to community continuity. Effective design also takes into consideration adjacent land character types. DRAFT RTl 5 4/'22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan A PLAN FOR ACTION L Goals The vision of the Route 288 Corridor Plan is to effectively guide future development in a way that promotes maximum benefit to Chesterfield County's current and future citizens, while recognizing the importance of property rights, healthy neighborhoods, environmental preservation and the County's high quality of life. The goals listed below foster this vision and establish a framework for the Plan's more specific recommendations. A. Basic Principles 1. Recognize the prime importance of the Route 288 Corridor to Chesterfield County's economic future. 2. Take advantage of the benefits to Chesterfield County that Route 288 will have as a primary component of the region's transportation system. 3. Chart a future for the area that takes into account both the interests of the current community and the long-term welfare of all Chesterfield citizens. B. Orderly Growth 1. Guide each type of development to the most appropriate area by following the County's Comprehensive Plan. 2. Discourage development that may be detrimental to long-term economic and environmental goals. 3. Minimize the cost of public facilities by promoting orderly and efficient development. 4. Only approve development proposals supported by public utilities. C. Transportation 1. Provide a safe, efficient and cost-effective transportation system. 2. Control development densities within the Corridor so that smooth flow of traffic is provided on Route 288 and on major arterial and collector streets. 3. Provide for the construction of additional major arterial and collector streets as development occurs to mitigate the increase in traffic generated by development in the Corridor. 4. Properly locate and limit the number of access points to major arterial and collector streets. 5. Encourage pedestrian activity at appropriate locations in the Corridor. D. Economic Opportunities 1. Maximize the economic development potential of the Route 288 Corridor as a prime location for basic sector employment, such as corporate office and light industrial uses. 2. Take advantage of the potential for spin-off economic development from other major employment centers in the region, especially those opportunities for high-tech industry and corporate office centers. 3. Work to provide more basic sector jobs closer to the population centers in northern Chesterfield County. 4. Identify large parcels that are suitable for industrial development. 5. Protect sites identified for industrial use from encroaching residential and retail development. 6. Identify and market parcels appropriate for economic development. E. Resource Protection 1. Maintain the environmental quality of the area. D RAFT RT 16 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan 2. Protect water quality in the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir watershed, as well as in the area's perennial and non-perennial streams. 3. Encourage development to accommodate and preserve existing landscape where possible. 4. Protect historic resources in the area by promoting historic designation of identified structures and encouraging development to preserve historic structures. F. Housing 1. Promote housing development that will meet the needs of future residents and businesses. 2. Where residential development is appropriate, strive for a mix of housing options that will complement the County's economic development initiatives. G. Community Character and Design 1. Enhance the aesthetic quality of the area through quality design. 2. Encourage public safety through the effective design of development. 3. Encourage development design that promotes community character. II. Recommendations The following recommendations are the specific actions required to carry out the Route 288 Corridor Plan. These recommendations, combined with the land use plan that follows, will help guide the future of the Route 288 Corridor area. However, these recommendations will require cooperation between businesses, industries, residents and government to make them successful. A. Land Use 1. Land Use Plan: Follow the land use recommendations of the Route 288 Corridor Plan (Alternative B) to guide future decision making. Aggregation: Through the zoning process, encourage owners interested in selling smaller land parcels in the Route 288 Corridor to join with adjacent property owners to aggregate land holdings large enough to accommodate a large-scale plan of development. Incompatible Uses: Residential land uses should be discouraged in areas designated for non- residential areas in this Plan (areas designated for light industrial, office or commercial land uses) and vice versa, except where those uses are permitted by right. B. Quality Design Large-Scale Development: Encourage large-scale development projects of quality design which follow an office park-planned development approach (i.e., Arboretum, Moorefleld, Boulders). These projects should also include an internal road network and controlled access. Design Standards: Adopt amendments to the County's Design Standards Manual creating an overlay district for the Route 288 Corridor Plan area in all Regional Employment Center land use areas (see Map F) which would: a) Increase landscaping required in front and corner setbacks for new development. b) Require curb and gutter in all new developments. c) Allow building heights of up to 150 feet. d) Require new development adjacent to Route 288 to orient buildings so that the views of buildings from Route 288 will not be of loading docks, storage areas, etc. e) Require developers to design attractive wet ponds for Best Management Practices (BMPs) that can be incorporated into developments as amenities. DRAFT RTl7 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan f) Enhance requirements for quality architecture. g) Require developments in I-2 Districts to pave their parking lots. h) Limit outdoor storage uses in I-2 Districts. i) Encourage pedestrian access in and around projects and a plan for linking pedestrian access to adjacent properties. 3. Safety: All development proposals should be designed to accommodate public safety needs. Urban Design: The area closest to the Route 288~60 interchange may be appropriate for an urban or neo-traditional scaled and designed development. This concept may include reduced setbacks, formal landscaping, pedestrian access, superior architectural design and other features that are representative of this urban or neo-traditional design. A quality development of this type could be submitted and processed through the County's CUPD (Conditional Use Planned Development) process. C. Economic Growth Proactive Zoning: Because of the economic development opportunities available in this area, not present in other areas of the County, there may be situations where the County would like to encourage development. Additional study of proactive rezoning should be conducted following the adoption of The Route 288 Corridor Plan. 2. Opportunity: The Department of Economic Development should continue to identify prime sites in the area and pursue proven developers to build quality office and business parks. Jobs: The Department of Economic Development should determine which types of economic activities (i.e., corporate and divisional headquarters, research and development, light manufacturing, distribution, back office operations, office/office showroom, etc.) will create the best job opportunities (payroll) for County citizens and generate significant tax revenues to Chesterfield County and pursue those uses for the Route 288 planning area. Marketing: The Economic Development Department should develop and implement a marketing plan to capitalize on location advantages of the Route 288 Corridor, such as its proximity to workers, John Tyler Community College, major roads and Motorola's West Creek Campus. D. Public Facilities Utilities Study: A detailed utilities study should be undertaken to address possible demand/capacity issues, if uses are pursued that are more intense than those reflected by the Plan. 2. Water/Wastewater Ordinance: The County should adopt an Ordinance for this area requiring mandatory hook-up to County water and wastewater at the time of development. 3. Policing Office: As the surrounding communities grow and develop, an appropriate location for a policing office should be identified and permitted in a central, strategic location. 4. Fire/Rescue Facility: A fire/rescue station is planned within the area of Midlothian Turnpike and Route 288 to meet the existing and future demands for service and response time standards. E. Transportation 1. Thoroughfare Plan: Amend the County's Thorouqhfare Plan in the Route 288 Corridor, as shown on Map F, and use the amended Plan as the guide for transportation recommendations on development proposals. DRAFT RTl 8 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Mitigating Road Improvements: Development proposals within the Corridor should provide mitigating road improvements, to include right-of-way dedication, construction of turn lanes, installation of traffic signalization and shoulder improvements. Access to Arterial and Collector Roads: Through the zoning, site plan review and subdivision review processes, control access to major arterial and collector roads through shared access, adequate access separation and traffic control devices to maintain orderly and efficient traffic flow. 4. Traffic Noise Abatement: Provide setbacks for future sound-sensitive land uses, such as residential development along Route 288, to reduce traffic noise impacts. 5. Pedestrian Access: Develop a network of sidewalks, in accordance with the County's Sidewalk Policy, to provide for pedestrian travel. Route 288 Funding: The funds that have been allocated for the Route 288 project will provide a four (4) lane facility between Powhite Parkway and Midlothian Turnpike and a two (2) lane facility north of Midlothian Turnpike. The County should aggressively pursue completion of Route 288. F. Environmental Resources Vegetation: Through the zoning process, encourage developers to disturb as little landscape and plant life as possible around the entrances and fringes of the project area and bodies of water to preserve the area's environmental character and the natural erosion and pollutant controls provided by the undisturbed vegetation. 2. Regional BMPs: If development does take place on a site that is expected to be served by a regional BMP facility, staff will assist the developer in identi~ing a regional site and will attempt to facilitate discussions among the developer and other landowners for a regional facility. However, staff will not require a regional facility unless the developer and other landowners agree on a voluntary regional approach. If such an agreement is not reached, the developer will be required to provide a BMP facility for his own site. DRAFT RTl 9 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan G. Housing and Community 1. Housing Types: Evaluate whether revisions to the County's residential zoning ordinances would encourage a mix of housing options for new workers, complementing the County's economic development initiatives. H. Historic Resources 1. Preserve Structures: Bethel Baptist Church and Hallsborough Tavern, historic structures, should be preserved. Any adjacent development is encouraged to be architecturally compatible. Historic Area: Create an area around Bethel Baptist Church and Hallsborough Tavern, as shown on Map F. Any development in this area is encouraged to incorporate the design characteristics of these historic structures to preserve the historic character of the area. The goal of this area is to maintain the sense of place at this intersection created by Hallsborough Tavern and Bethel Baptist Church: a) On the north side of Midlothian Turnpike, development is encouraged to incorporate design features from the existing historic properties, including building scale, architectural design and texture. Further, development in this area is encouraged to incorporate pedestrian access and sidewalks. b) On the south side of Midlothian Turnpike, properties adjacent to Midlothian Turnpike are encouraged to be similar in scale and architecture to Hallsborough Tavern and Chapel Hill. Development in the remainder of this portion of the historic district may be larger in scale but not overwhelming to the smaller-scale development. Historic Designations: The Chesterfield County Preservation Committee should work with the property owners of Bethel Baptist Church and Chapel Hill to have these properties designated as County historic landmarks. Historic and Cultural Significance: The Chesterfield County Preservation Committee should recognize Mount Sinai Baptist Church and Cemetery for their historic and cultural significance to the County, including a plaque at the site explaining the story and significance of the church and initiate steps to designate it as a historic landmark. I!1. The Land Use Plan The land use plan for the Route 288 Corridor is a guide for future change. The land use plan illustrates the recommended future development pattern for the Route 288 Corridor area (see Map F). This map will be a useful guide for the future land use and rezoning decisions. Land use categories, their definitions and key features of recommended uses are presented in Chart 3. Successfully implemented, this land use plan will: · Target key land in the northwestern part of Chesterfield County for office, light industrial and corporate park uses; in turn, strengthening the County's tax base and providing new employment opportunities. Promote a land use development pattern that takes best advantage of Route 288's links to the region's transportation system while, at the same time, providing effective transition between new uses and adjacent communities. DRAFT RT20 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan The land use plan offers guidance to County staff, elected officials and citizens as new development proposals are brought for'ward and evaluated. For example, if a landowner is interested in developing his vacant property, which is currently zoned for Agricultural (A) uses, the land use plan will be consulted by staff as they determine their recommendation for the rezoning. If the rezoning request does not comply with the land use designation on the land use plan, staff is not likely to recommend approval of the request. Generally, the land use plan does not recommend changes to the zoning of any land. However, as outlined in the land use recommendations, if the Board of Supervisors chooses to rezone property in this area, this land use plan will be used as a guide. DRAFT RT21 4/22J99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Chart 3 LAND USE CATEGORIES The categories shown on Map F are described below. Because land use plans are a general guide for recommended future growth, ail uses that could possibly be developed cannot be listed here. More detailed information on potential uses can be found in the corresponding categories (i.e., 0-2) of the Chesterfield County Zoning Ordinance. · Residential (One (1) dwelling or less per acre): Residences, and under certain circumstances, places of worship, schools, parks and other similar public facilities. · Office/Residential Mixed Use: Professional and administrative offices (0-2), residential developments of varying densities, and light industry (I-1). Under certain circumstances, supporting small-scale, retail uses may be incorporated into a larger development. · Office: Professional and administrative offices (0-2). Under certain circumstances, supporting small-scale, retail uses may be incorporated into a larger development. · Convenience Commercial (not shown on Plan): Limited retail, service and office uses (C-1 and O-1) mainly serving nearby neighborhoods or rural locations, generally located at the intersection of through streets (the intersection of two (2) collectors or a collector and an arterial as designated in the Thorou.qhfare Plan), provided adequate spacing is provided. In developing areas, they should be planned in conjunction with new residential projects. · Neighborhood Mixed Use: Neighborhood-oriented commercial uses (C-2), including small shopping centers. · Light Industrial/Flex: Offices, warehouses and light industrial uses (I-1 and some I-2 uses), including research and development uses as well as flex space. Under certain circumstances, supporting small-scale, retail uses may be incorporated into a larger development. · Regional Employment Center: Office, research and development uses, warehouses and light industrial uses (I-1). Moderate industrial uses may be appropriate in some locations if appropriate access, buffering and land use transitions are provided. Under certain circumstances, supporting small-scale, retail uses may be incorporated into a larger development. Midlothian Area Community Land Use And Transportation Plan: The shaded area on Map F shows recommended land uses from this Plan, as adopted in 1989 and amended in 1992. It is shown here for information purposes only and is not recommended for revision. · Residential Medium Density (1.01 to 2.5 units/acre): Housing types will be predominantly single family detached units and may also include schools and playgrounds, places of worship and isolated neighborhood service uses. · Planned Transition Area: This area is appropriate for mixed-use development that contributes to an overall transition to a smaller-scale, pedestrian-oriented environment in Midlothian Village. Primary uses will include office, medium-density housing (7-14 units/acre), personal services and community facilities. · Suburban Commercial District: Suburban, auto-oriented design district to include retail shopping centers, office-service establishments and similar uses. Note 2: A regional scale high fashion mall or lifestyle center can be appropriate at this quadrant if: · integrated with the regional employment center uses, · the majority of the anchor stores serve a metropolitan-wide market. Neighborhood retail uses may be appropriate if integrated with the other designated uses. DRAFT RT22 4/22/99 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 7.D. Subject: Authorize County Administrator to Enter into a Settlement Agreement with Vulcan Materials Company and Authorize Certain Financial Transfers. Coun _ty Administrator's Comments: Board Action Requested: Table consideration of the settlement agreement pending receipt of State mining permit by Vulcan. Summary_ of Information: In February, the Board deferred for 60 days consideration of a settlement agreement for Vulcan and the County to share the cost of designing and constructing Coalboro Road Extended for Vulcan's quarry truck traffic. The item was deferred because Vulcan had not obtained the required State mining permit to operate the quarry. The State returned Vulcan's quarry permit application to Vulcan in January with comments regarding modifications Vulcan needed to make to its operating plan to obtain state approval. However, Vulcan still has not resubmitted its application to the State for approval. Accordingly, staff recommends that consideration of the settlement agreement be tabled pending Vulcan's completion of the State permitting process. If the Board tables this item, staff will place it On the Board's agenda for the first meeting after the State issues Vulcan's mining permit. Preparer: ~'5\~-,'o~-,~ , ~/h 'C~ Title: CountyAttorney Steven L. Micas 0505:44531. I Attachments: E3Yes 1No I#' 13471  CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA rage 1 ofl Meeting Date' April 28, 1999 Item Number: 8.^.1. Subiect: Ordinance Amendments to Section 9-24 of the County Code Relating to Restrictions and Conditions on Finance and Taxation related to Real Estate for the Elderly and Handicapped County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adopt Attached Ordinance Amendments to Section 9-24 of the County Code Relating to Restrictions and Conditions on Finance and Taxation related to Real Estate Summary of Information: The attached ordinance amendment recommends a change to the tax relief for the elderly exclusion amount of income of each relative living with the owner to $6,500 (currently with CPI adjustments this limit is $6,000). This change will have a minimal effect on tax relief exclusions. Staff recommends adoption of the attached ordinance. Preparer: ~(.~2~,f'c, ~',/~/'Q/~ Title: Director, Bud,qet and Manacllemer~t Rebecca T. Dickson Attachments: Yes ~-~No #' B48] AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 9-24 RELATING TO RESTRICTIONS AN'D CONDITIONS ON FINANCE AND TAXATION' BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 9-24 of the Code of the (7oun~ of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 9-24.Restrictions and conditions. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, a dwelling or manufactured home, and up to one acre of land upon which either is situated may be temporarily exempted from taxation when any such property is owned by and occupied as the sole residence of a person at least 65 years old or a person who is determined to be permanently and totally disabled as defined by Code of Virginia, § 58.1-3217. The exemption shall be subject to the following restrictions and conditions: (a)During the preceding calendar year, the total combined income from all sources of the owners and owners' relatives living in the dwelling or manufactured home must not exceed $40,000.00; without including in the total the first $$,g00.00 $6,500,00 of each relative's income, other than the owner's spouse who is living in the dwelling or manufactured home. 000 That this ordinance shall become effective July 1, 1999. I)614:44072.1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetinq Date: April 28~ 1999 Item Number: 8.A.2. Subject: Adoption of Ordinance Amendments to Section 5-5 of the County Code Relating to Building Permit Fees County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adopt Attached Ordinance Amendments to Section 5-5 of the County Code Relating to Building Permit Fees Summary of Information: Fees are reviewed annually and adjusted to cover operational expenses of the Department of Building Inspection. The recommended change for FY2000 is to base residential permit fees on a cost per inspection charging a flat fee. The proposed fee structure increases fees for residential auxiliary permits such as mechanical, plumbing, electrical, etc. and charges a flat fee of $480 for a single family dwelling permit. These changes will result in an estimated $412,500 to meet the goal of funding the cost of enforcing the state residential building code. Staff recommends adoption of the attached ordinance. Preparer: ~(~~"~-/.~l'~(~,~, Title: Director of Budget & Management Rebecca T. Dickson, Attachments: Yes AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD., 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 5-5 RELATING TO PERMIT FEES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 5-5 of the Code qf the Coun~ o_f Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 5-5. Permit fees. (a) Generally. Except as provided in this section, every applicant for a building permit must pay the fees set forth in this section before the building official issues a building permit that is required by the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, Volume I. If an applicant must pay an additional fee because of an increase in the estimated cost of work, the building official shall not issue an amended permit for the additional work until the applicant has paid the additional fee. (b) Fees shall be charged in accordance with the following schedule: · '~w~Ju~l,uai ii~W COiiSh~CtiOii2 L Y. U lIll11131 lg,~. lllg[71 lb'l 3LlUfl, I g; ILtkJ La, ID. U.~tjV i jUl ~lTiiL .1 U. IJUIU UUEIUIII~3~ ~({,ZaUL/U30~IIU, IJO, VIIiUii3 , .. $ '-I'U.V(J4A A, O Willtllllll~ {JUYl~ ~IIUkJVU- ([llU ilI-~IIJUIIUJ. y,.. [:-'=riiii~-~ul~'-" SWiiiiiiiiiig .... ' :z' ........ :.~_a ......... L_ puu.t, ,.t p~,nm.~u ;~,~pata~.,~ly uul'u aWilillillli~ pUUi pVillll[ . . . JUoUU ruunuauun pOiii- iiiSpOG~iOii$. ..~.~** r I,z-J UUIIIIIIE;I [dill IIITW taidll3Ll INI~;W tcidllllll~l L, IO.I UklllYtll~;3. V/.JJU [/E;I L,I~IIL gL tilE; ~bLIIIIO. LGU k~UIIDLI LD, cLIUII 1. Id. 2014:44062. I April 19, 1999 (1 l:57AM) 2 'L k]J~ll~, q)Jg. Ug JJiLlb U.JJU JJglgglil, UI LII~ g~l, lllld, l, gU gUIi~I, IIJJuI, iUII gU~I, UYgl t ~uma upu[~ i~tuuic,~ paviuun~ k,u~g uuuum~u~ ~q~au~ tutu rOiiO-v-&tiOfiS: 0 WilIIIIIIII~ ]JUUI3. ,41 1 du.uu [JlU3 u, JJU ]JUl built Ul. I, ll[j [J~LIIIIilL[JU L, UII3LI Uk4.1UII bUbL UV[JI kDZsUUu.uO rm,~ puig . . . t UIII~)UI ~ll ~ ~UI tlllbdL~;~ UI Ut~bUD(til9~ dllLl i UIIU W(tl~ . . . I tYU.Ut/ i\Uk{UU)L LUII UIUIItl. /-J pul 9Ullt UI UI l~ill~ll iUU. kJ ] ~u~,,lm y F,w liut~. OAL[JIO~LI[JII~ I[JIJIO~UIII[JIIL fl,llLl/lJl l[jIJllIl 13 [IUtlIIUUI. I [J. lJ t[.) LII~ II[J.5. L [IUll(llJ. ~I>VVV.VV Ul l[j~)~, . . , JV.VV kJ V [jl q) I .~VVU. VV. qlJU. VV ]Yll. J.b kJ...,.., V [JUl [.,[Jilt. t.)! LII[J [jDIt. lllld. L[W. L, tJ3t O~V'~;I L U. ~IIL[JI <IUUII~ IUplilbUlll[jllk ~lliU/UI IU}Jd. ll 13 klULIII[IUU U[J LU UIU Iii;II UUII~IIJ. 2014:44062.1 April 19, 1999 (ll:57AM) U. 1. ... 11. UVUI 4) I.,UUU,UU. O.YU.UU pill.;3 U..Y.YU lyU;l ~,..,UllL Ul I, liU Ui)I, IIIIca, LUU. k.,U~i. UVUI Il. U. ..: UV~I ~)I~UUU.~U. ~U.UU IJIUX) U.J~U ~JIDI~IIL UL LIIK7 12;DLLIII~.LiD[I t~/~,l, tJV~l ~ 1 ~LY~YU. U~Y. fl, lt~l {ILJUII, 1 g;lYl~2~,~;lll~lil, (IIlU./Ul 1 g;lYfl.ll 13 [I UtlIIU.~kl tllY LU tll~ llU;At, ULIlI(IlJ. 11. U ¥ G1 q} 1 ,~ UUU. UU. ~ J U. UU IJIU;3 u..Y J U [JG1 t. aUIIL Ul [,l JU Ch LIIIIOa&UIJ ~..,U~3L U V G1 ¥'/ ~ll IJ[IJLIIL. ¥¥11~11 [11~ gUi)i, UI LO, UUI O.,llt. l 1110~1,~110~13 IIIYUI¥[LI iii III3I, fl, IIO~LIUII~ ~ ~,~.00. 2014:44062.1 April 19, 1999 (l l:57AM) 054 F'U. IIIU.{ll DUI LII. I~.,~I. LC UI. UUIII_[JIIO~IIk~U I. UI UIU V {1gUI 37 [,3Ufl, IO~LUI ~, [.I. JUI IIUUI J~ 1. I\C31[J. UIILIO. I . ,.z..J.UU r-~u,,t,,u~uautv~ k,~Hmt umy ii0 u,~pvCtluu3j . . . l u.00 L U. Y J I ClIIIIL I gilgllU3, il O. II lllJ[./IIk, O. LIUII IUI 11, ld~l IIIJL 13 k, llllD~l~,kl Uy VVIILLCll ICkIUC3L LU 2014:44062.1 April 19, 1999 (11:57AM) ii. attu oWut luucx ut iii &ii~y- vatuuatnt~ j uu~ um iS app~ u vcu uy tuc uuuutu~ /l[d~/tlt~],lll, 3 IUI UU-IIUlII~ }JUIIIIIL3 3IlO, Il IJUL UU; IUkIUIIUkl LU ].ltl,)/ IUU3 1£ LIIU U3LIIII(I, LUU ~,J~,L gAN ~,~d General Fees: Administrative fees: permit amendments, extensions, take-overs, transfers, and reinstatements $40.00 Code investigation fees: i_. Residential $25.00 or 25% of the applicable permit fee, if greater ii._:. Commercial $50.00 or 25% of the applicable permit fee, if greater Public service requests: at Cost i_. Certificate of occupancy search/reprint $10.00 Reinspection fees: $40.00 Refund Requests (when construction was not started): 2014:44062.1 April 19, 1999 (1 l:57AM) i_. Residential $40.00, or 25% of original fee, whichever is greater ii~ Comrnercial $100.00, or 25% of original fee, whichever is greater Temporary Certificates of Occupancy and Renewals: i_. Residential building permits $40.00 ii~ Commercial building permits: Residential Building Permits: a._~. $100.00 Single Family Dwellings $480.00 Modular Homes $200.00 Mobile and Manufactured Homes on Private Property $80.00 Mobile and Manufactured Homes in a Mobile Home Park $40.00 Additions, Attachments, Annexes and Alterations: i_. Additions, other than those listed below $280.00 ii~ Florida Rooms, Attached Garages, Detached Garages with second Floor Occupiable Space $240.00 Detached Garages (no second Floor Occupiable Space) $200.00 Alterations, and Converting Deck/Porch/Garage to Finished Space, $120.00 Porch Additions, Gazebos, Chimneys, and Attached Carports $120.00 Deck Additions, and Detached Carports $80.00 Attached Sheds $80.00 Detached Sheds (over 150 square feet), including Prefab Sheds on Skids, and Pole Sheds .$80.00 Renovations and Repairs (including Fire Damage) i_. ii_~ Interior Renovation $80.00 Exterior Renovation and Storm Damage Repairs $40.00 Re-roofs, Re-siding and Chimney Relining $40.00 Fire damage repair permits: shall be based upon the most similar permit fee Other Residential Permits: Residential foundation pour inspections $335.00 f2) Additional fee if concrete testing is required because 2014:44062.1 April 19, 1999 (1 l:57AM) vii___; Vlll. ix.___~. X~ xi.__;. out-of-specification concrete is used $100.00 Additional fee for reinspection when inspector is present and the, concrete pour has been canceled or delayed in excess of one hour $1oo.oo As an alternative to the county's foundation pour inspection, the. building official may accept inspection reports from qualified. independent engineers who are approved and reliable. Swimming Pools (Above and In-Ground) $40.00 Pool Barrier Fences (if permitted separately from pool) Relocation (House Moving) $160.00 Demolition $40.00 Elevator $40.00 Residential Auxiliary Permits: a_=. Electrical Residential Auxiliary Permits i_. ii~ iii__;. iv.__.; $40.00 New Single Family Dwellings $120.00 Additions and Interior Renovations $80.00 Exterior Renovations, Installations, Relocations, Conversions, and Service Changes $40.00 Temporary Poles, Porch Additions, Decks, Pools, Carports, and Repairs $40.00 v_:. Mobile or Manufactured Homes on Private Property Gas Residential Auxiliary_ Permits i_. $40.00 New Single Family Dwellings, Fireplace Logs, and New Equipment/Piping Installations $80.00 ii~ Repairs $40.00 iii. Mobile or Manufactured Homes on Private Property Mechanical Residential Auxiliary_ Permits i_. New Single Family Dwellings $80.00 ii~ Additions, Equipment Installations, Conversions and Repairs iii. Mobile or Manufactured Homes on Private Property $40.00 Plumbing Residential Auxilia .ry Permits $40.00 $40.00 2014:44062. I April 19, 1999 (1 l:57AM) ii_. iii__~. iv. V_.=. New Residential Single Family Dwellings $160.00 Modular Homes $120.00 Additions $80.00 Installations, Repairs, Conversions, Renovations and Relocations Mobile or Manufactured Homes on Private Property $40.00 $40.00 Boiler, Fire and Well Residential Auxiliary Permits (each single family dwelling) $40.0O f. Small Appliance Permits for replacement of air handlers, furnaces, heat pumps, humidifiers, water heaters, dishwashers, garbage disposals, and similar equipment normally requiring two permits $50.00 Commercial Building Permits: New Construction: i_. Fee for each $1,000 or fraction thereof of the estimated construction cost $5.50 ii_=. Minimum fee $250.00 Additions: ii_. Tenant i_. ii_. Fee for each $1,000 or fraction thereof estimated construction cost $5.50 Minimum fee .$150.00 Upfits, Re-roofs, Pavilions, Pole Buildings, Repairs & Renovations: Estimated cost of $2,000 or less $100.00 Fee for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof of the estimated construction cost above $2,000 $5.50 Estimated cost of $2,000 or less $50.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction construction cost $5.50 Signs: i_. ii__:. Fee Commercial Swimming Pools: ii~ thereof of the estimated Estimated cost of $2,000 or less $150.00 Fee for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof of the estimated construction cost $5.50 Barrier Permit, if permitted separately from the swimming pool permitS50.00 2014:44062.1 April 19, 1999 (1 l:57AM) 9 Temporary Construction Trailers $50.00 Flag Poles and Tents (greater than 900 square feet) $40.00 Satellite Dish $100.00 Demolition, Moving or Relocation of a Commercial Structure Commercial Auxiliary Permits: $100.00 To include electrical, mechanical, plumbing, gas, active solar system, fire/sprinkler.. and well permits, when the cost of labor and materials involved installation, alteration, replacement and/or repair is (rounded up to the nearest dollar): i_. $1,000 or less $50.00 ii_. For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, of the estimated cost over $1,000 $5.50 Other Commercial Permits: Annual Certificate of compliance for Elevators, Escalators (per floor), Dumbwaiter:: & Man lifts, payable on or before December 31 st for the following year $40.00 Amusement Devices: ii_. iii__~ iv__~. Administrative amusement permit, where no inspections are required$10.00 Kiddie Rides - Type A. $10.00 Kiddie Rides - Type B $15.00 _Major Rides $25.00 .Spectacular Rides Fee Exemptions: $45.00 a_. A building permit fee will not be required where the cost of construction is less than $500 and would not require securing any permit for electrical, gas, mechanical o1' plumbing work in accordance with Section 107 of the Virginia Uniform Statewi&~ Building Code. A building permit fee will not be required for the construction of buildings designed and used as a place of worship. A building permit fee will not be required for building permits for construction by county departments funded by the general fund. A building or auxiliary_ permit fee will not be charged for commercial constructio, located in an "Enterprise Zone" as designated by the Commonwealth of Virginia administered by the Chesterfield County Block Grant Office. This exemption shall 2014:44062.1 April 19, 1999 (1 l:57AM) 10 f 60 (e) continue for the life of the Enterprise Zone. Disposition of fees. All permit fees required by this section shall be paid by the applicant to the county treasurer when the permit application is filed with the building official. The treasurer shall deposit all permit fees in the county's general fund. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 2014:44062.1 April 19, 1999 (1 l:57AM) 11 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of I Meetin~q Date: April 28~ 1999 Item Number: 8.^.3. Subiect: Ordinance Amendments to Section 8-13 of the County Code Relating to Erosion and Sediment Control County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adopt Attached Ordinance Amendments to Section 8-13 of the County Code Relating to Erosion and Sediment Control Fees Summary of Information: The attached ordinance amendment recommends implementation of a $40 per permit charge for reviewing residential permits for drainage/erosion control compliance. This fee will generate an estimated $126,000 and will cover the cost of hiring two additional senior construction drainage inspectors in an attempt to keep pace with the annual growth in the number of inspections required. Staff recommends adoption of the attached ordinance. Preparer: ~'~ '~/~ (~-~"¥~ Title: Director of Budget & Management Rebecca T. Dickson Attachments: Yes AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS A.MENDED, BY AMENDING SECTION 8-13 PERTAINING TO EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FEES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) 7hat Section 8-13 of the Code of the Coun~ qf Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and reenacted to read as follows: Sec. 8-13. Fees. (a) The applicant shall pay a program administration fee to the county at the time that he submits to the environmental engineer an erosion and sediment' control plan. The amount of the fee shall be: (i) (ii) For an erosion and sediment control plan for land which is 10,000 square feet or larger and not located in a proposed subdivision:' $1,060.00, plus $50.00 for each acre of land to be disturbed. For an erosion and sediment control plan for land which is I0,O00 square feet or larger and located in a proposed subdivision: $1,060.00, plus $50.00 for each lot. (iii) For an erosion and sediment control plan for land which is less than 10,000 square feet and is not to be used for a single-family residence: $100.00. (iv) For an any building permit application or erosion and sedimem control plan for land which is less than 10,000 square feet and is to be used for a single-family residence, separately built or any amendment thereto that changes the proposed building footprint from that &the initial submission: $40 00 (b) No program administration fee shall be required for an erosion and sedimem comrol plan for land-disturbing activity that (-i-) takes place in conjunction with a land use for which a minor site plan has been approved in accordance with the zoning ordinance oi- (ii) is for a ainglc-faii-dly (c) Ifa land-disturbance permit is revoked, the applicant shall pay an administrative fee in an amount equal to one-half of the original program administration fee when the applicant applies to have the land-disturbance permit reissued. 0505:44053.1 1 (d) No business located within an Enterprise Zone designated by the Commonwealth of Virginia shall be required to pay any of the fees described in this section. This exemption shall continue for the life of the Enterprise Zone. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 0505:44053.1 2 Meeting Date: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 April 28, 1999 Item Number: 8 .A.4. Subiect: Adoption of the FY2000-2004 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) County Administrator's Comments: County ~dministrator: Board Action Requested: Adopt the FY2000-2004 Capital Improvement Program Summary of Information: The County Charter requires that the CIP be adopted by May 1. recommends that the CIP be adopted at this meeting. Staff Following the work session, staff will incorporate any requested revisions into the adopted document. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Bud.qet and Manaqement Attachments: ~--~ Yes No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 .. Meetin,cj Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 8.^.5. Subiect: Adoption of the FY2000 Community Development Block Grant and HOME Annual Plan Count,~ Ad. minist,'ator's Co~j~;ments' County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adopt the FY2000 Community Development Block Grant and HOME Annual Plan and Authorize the Reallocation of $911,054 in Previous Fiscal Year Program Funding Summary of Information: The FY2000 recommendation for this program totals $2,711,300 which is .~mprised of $1,800,Z46 in new ~D_G and HOME allotments and $911,954 of zeproqra~ned ,~pproF~iations from previous fiscal year Fzo~rams which have been completed. The County's Community Development Block Grant and HOME Annual Plan for FY2000 is required to be submitted to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development by May 15, 1999. The submission must follow a required public hearing by the Board of Supervisors. A Proposal Review Committee has made its recommendation to the County Administrator on the County's FY2000 CDBG and HOME funding. The attached material is the Proposal Review Committee's recommendation and the recommendation from the County Administrator. Requested amendments will be incorporated prior to adoption. Preparer:... ~-~__~'-~'C(~v~ Title: Director, Bud~etandManaqement Rebecca T. Dickson Attachments: Yes W F-.- LIJ ..,.J 0 I J I 070 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 8. ^. 6. Subject: Adoption of the FY99-2000 Biennial Financial Plan County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adopt the FY99-2000 Biennial Financial Plan Summary of Information: The County Charter requires that the Budget be adopted by May 1. recommends that the Budget be adopted at this meeting. Staff Following the work session, staff will prepare a summary of changes to the proposed budget to be included in the adopted budget. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budget and Manaqement Attachments: ~--~ Yes No I"'#' 07Z J CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meetin~l Date: April 28~ 1999 Item Number: 8.A.7. Subject: Adoption of a Resolution to Appropriate Funds for Fiscal Year 1999-2000 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adopt the attached Appropriations Resolution Summary of Information: The County Charter requires passage of an appropriations resolution to authorize the expenditure of funds for fiscal year 1999-2000. The attached appropriations resolution details the allocation of funds consistent with the proposed budget. Changes approved by the Board at the work session will be incorporated in the adopted resolution. Outlined below are specific issues related to this resolution. School Fund As in FY99, the resolution will withhold $4.5 million of local funding for schools from the appropriation. The County Administrator will be authorized to transfer $1.5 million to the School Fund at three different specified times during the fiscal year contingent upon funds availability, thereby increasing the appropriation for schools to the total approved amount. This policy allows for the flexibility to adjust the School appropriation in the event of unanticipated circumstances. Preparer: ~C[, ~'~1 ~~'~ Title: Director of Budget & Management Rebecca T. Dickson Attachments: Yes ~-]No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meetin(] Date: Anril 28. 199~1 Item Number: Summary of Information (cont.): Other Changes Section 25 has been added to authorize the County Administrator to reclassify budgeted revenues, as appropriate, to reflect implementation of the State's Personal Property Tax Relief Act. 074 APPENDIX H APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE DESIGNATED FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS FROM DESIGNATED ESTIMATED REVENUES FOR FY2000 FOR THE OPERATING BUDGET AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FOR THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield: That for the fiscal year beginning on the first day of July, 1999, ~nd ending on the thirtieth day of June, 2000, the following sections shall be adopted: The following designated funds and accounts shall be appropriated from the designated estimated revenues to operate and to provide a capital improvements program for the County: General Fund Estimated Revenue: From Local Sources: General Property Taxes Other Local Taxes Licenses, Permits, Fees Fines & Forfeitures Other Local Government From Other Agencies: State, Federal & Other Localities Transfers & Reserves: Reserves Transfer from County Capital Projects Transfer from CDBG Grant Transfer from Utilities Anticipated Fund Balance 7/1/99 Total Revenues: General Government Administration of Justice Public Safety Pubhc Works Health and Welfare P~rks, Rec., Cultural 204,397,400 66,999,400 7,936,100 m,166,500 89,601,000 5,167,900 10,000 2S,000 425,140,100 24,688,400 4,431,8o0 76,265,800 12,122,400 ~s,212,~0 11,677,900 APPENDIX H APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION Comprehensive Services Fund Estimated Rezmrme: A~rovriations: School Operating Fund Estimated Rroenue: Community Development Non-Dep~-tental Debt Service Operating Transfers Subsidy of the Health Center Commission Reserves Ending Fund Balance, 6/30/2000 Total General Fund: Reimbursement, Colonial Heights State Aid, Comprehensive Srvs. Tr~msfer from Social Services Transfer from Schools Transfer from General Fund Total Revenue: Operating Expenses To (From) Retained Earnings Total Appropriations: Local Sources State Federal Transfer from School CIP Use of Reserve Transfer from School Operating to Gr~nts Fund Transfer from General Fund: State S~les Tax Local Taxes Postal Support Prior Year Revenue Grounds M~nten~nce TotalGeneralFund: Beginning Balance 400,000 1,321,000 29,687,800 425,140,100 L36o,4oo 345,200 525,000 2,862,400 2,862,400 0 2,862,400 $14,970,000 t23,792,2oo 52,507,800 1,941,000 6,146,200 ~74,500 35,899,800 142,604,200 503,200 2,092,900 5,2?4,800 $577,974,90o 076 APPENDIX H APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION School Capital Projects Fund Estimated Revenue: A~.~ations: ,County Grants Fund: Est/mated Revenue: Total Revenues, Transfers & Reserves: Instruction Admiru'stration / A. & H. Pupil Transportation Operations & Maintenance Debt Service Food Service Grounds Maintenance Total Appropriations: Bond Proceeds Interest Earnings Transfer from Ca~sh Proffer Fund State Construction Allocation Construction Management Charges Total Revenue School Capital Projects Fund: Transfer to School Operating Fund School Projects Construction Management Department Total Appropriations School Capital Projects Fund: From Other Governments From the General Fund Total Revenue: CCS Options Grant Community Development Block Grant Community Corrections Services Domestic Violence Coordinator Family Preservation Juvenile Detention USDA Grant Litter Grant Pretrial Release 233,241,851 11,433,592 12,702,371 34,874,586 32,711,700 ~3,472,7oo 1,274~800 339,711,600 32,1oo, ooo 1,941,000 1,040,519 1,531,110 sl0,0oo 37,122,629 1,941,000 34,671,629 51o, ooo 37,122,629 5,101,600 533,000 5,634,600 5O,8OO 1,800,200 997,000 51,300 252,600 27,200 287,9OO APPENDIX H APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION County CIP Fund E~timated Revenue: County Maintenance Project~ Fund Estimated Revenue: Cash Proffer Fund Estimated Revenue: A~.~tions: Vehicle and Communications Maintenance Pohce Gr~mts Victim/Witness Assistance VJOZCA Total Appropriations: Bond Proceeds Lease/Purchase Proceeds Interest Earnings Donation Transfer from General Fund Transfer from Utilities Transfer from Cash Proffer Fund State Grants/Reimbursements Total Revenue: County Capital Projects Transfer to the General Fund Total County CIP Funds: Transfer from General fund Total Revenue: County Maintenance Projects Total County Maintenance Projects: Cash Proffers Total Revenues: Reimbursement Transfer to School Capital Projects Fund Transfer to County Capital Projects Fund Total Appropriations: 295,700 232,200 1,599,700 5,63~600 6,~3o,4oo 7o,0o0 lOO, O00 5,8~o,00o 29,123,800 1,164~719 24,200 1,040,519 1,164,719 APPENDIX H APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION Estimated Revenue: A~tions: Construction Management Fund Estimated Revenue: Al~ropri~tions : Risk Management Fund Estimated Reoenue: Appropriations: Airport Fund Estimated Revenue: Airport Capital Improvement Fund Garage/Fleet Charges Two-way Radio Charges Total Revenue: Garage/Fleet Communications / Electronics Addition to Reserves Total Appropriations: Service Charges Total Revenue: Construction Management Operations Addition to Retained Emaxings Total Appropriations: Operating Revenues Non-operating revenues Total Revenue: Risk Management Operations Total Appropriations: Sale of Stores and Supplies Rental Fees Misc. Revenue Total Revenue: Airport Operations Total Appropriations: 8,050,900 626,000 8,676,900 7,904,300 636,~oo 8,676,900 450,800 450,800 11,800 450,800 2,732,9OO 240,000 2,972,900 2,972,900 2,972,900 451,20o 451,200 451,200 079 APPENDIX H APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION Estimated Revenue: Al~rol~tions: Utilities Fund Estimated Revenue: A~ri~tions: Transfer from General Fund Total Revenue: Capital Improvements Total Appropriations: Service Charges Capital Cost Recovery Charges Hydrant/Fire Protection Transfer from General Fund Used from Improvement Replacement Fund Other Revenue Total Revenue: Operations Debt Service Transfer to County Capital Projects Transfer to General Fund Transfer to Capital Projects Payment in Lieu of Taxes Transfer to Wastewater Impro.,Replac. Fund Total Appropriations: 39%500 397,500 a9%500 397,500 7,269,000 1,709,500 0 %048,300 1,709,500 8,166,800 53,771,400 Utilities Capital Projects Fund Estimated Revenue: Transfer from Water/Wastewater Operating fund Total Revenue: C~pital Projects Total Appropriations: 7,401,000 O~o APPENDIX H APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION Appropriations in addition to those contained in the general appropriation resolution may be made by the Board only if there is available in the fund an unencumbered and unappropriated sum sufficient to meet such appropriations. The County Administrator may, as provided herein, except as set forth in Sections 7, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 21, authorize the transfer of any unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one classification of expenditure to another within the same department or appropriation function/category. The County Administrator may transfer up to $20,000 from the unencumbered balance of the appropriation of one appropriation function/category to another appropriation function/category. No more than one transfer may be made for the same item causing the need for a transfer, unless the total amount to be transferred for the item does not exceed $2O, OO0. The County Administrator may increase appropriations for the following non- budgeted revenue items that may occur during the fiscal year: a) Insurance recoveries received for damage to any County property, including vehides, for which County funds have been expended to make repairs. b) Refunds or reimbursements made to the County for which the County has expended funds directly related to that refund or reimbursement. c) Revenue not to exceed $20,000. All outstanding encumbrances, both operating and capital, at June 30, 1999 shall be reappropriated to the 1999-2000 fiscal year to the same department and account for which they were encumbered in the previous year. a) At the close of the fiscal year, all unencumbered appropriations lapse for budget items other than Capital Projects, reserves, refunds for off-site and oversized water and wastewater facilities, grants, cash proffers, Economic Development Incentive funds, rental income received from properties located at the Meadowville Industrial Park, actual transient occupancy tax revenues received and budgeted expenditures in connection with the Richmond Convention Center, Public Safety Career Development Reserve and donations restricted to specific purposes, including donations made by citizens and citizen groups in support of County programs. b) With adoption of this resolution all transient occupancy tax revenue received and related expenditures prior to June 30,1999 are hereby reappropriated. APPENDIX H APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION c) With adoption of this resolution all monies reserved for career deveopment for public safety departments prior to June 30, 1998 are hereby reappropriated. Appropriations designat~l for capital projects will not lapse at the end of the fiscal year but shall remain appropriations until the completion of the project or until the Board of Supervisors, by appropriate ordinance or resolution, changes or eliminates the appropriation. The County Administrator may approve necessary accounting transfers between funds to enable the capital projects to be accounted for correctly. Upon completion of a capital project, staff is authorized to close out the project and transfer any remaining balances to the funding source. This section applies to all existing appropriations for Capital Projects at June 30, 1999 and appropriations in the 1999-2000 budget. The County Administrator may approve construction contract change orders up to an increase of $15,000 and approve all change orders for reductions to contracts. The County Administrator may authorize the transfer of Utilities Capital Projects funds that are 20% or up to $100,000 of the original project cost, whichever is less, from any Utilities Capital Project to any other Utilities Capital Project. Should the actual contract price for a project be less than the appropriation, the County Administrator may approve transfer of excess funds to the funding source upon completion of the project. The approval by the Board of Supervisors to request and accept any grant of funds to the County constitutes the appropriation of both the revenue to be received from the grant and the County's expenditure required by the terms of the grant, if any. Allocation of Food Stamps will be considered a Board approved grant for purposes of this section up to the actual value of food stamps received. The appropriation of grant funds will not lapse at the end of the fiscal year, but shall remain appropriated until completion of the grant or until the Board of Supervisors changes or eliminates the appropriation. The County Administrator may reduce any grant appropriation to the level approved by the granting agency during the fiscal year. The County Administrator may approve necessary accounting transfers between funds to enable the grant to be accounted for correctly. All transfers to grant funds from operating funds are automatically carried over and reappropriated, unless the grant is completed and is to be dosed out at June 30. Upon completion of a grant project, County Administrator is authorized to close the grant and transfer back to the funding source any remaining balances. This applies to appropriations for grants outstanding at June 30,1999 and appropriations in the 1999-2000 budget. The County Administrator may reduce revenue and expenditure appropriations related to programs funded all or in part by the Commonwealth of Virginia APPENDIX H APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION Sec. 13 and/or the federal government to the level approved by the responsible state or federal agency. The Director of Accounting is authorized to make transfers to various funds for which there are transfers budgeted. The Director shall transfer funds only as needed up to amounts budgeted, or in accordance with any existing bond resolutions that specify the manner in which transfers are to be made. The Treasurer may advance monies to and from the various funds of the County to allow maximum cash flow efficiency. The advances must not violate county bond covenants or other legal restrictions that would prohibit such an advance. The County Administrator is authorized to make expenditures from Trust & Agency Funds for the specified reasons for which the funds were established. In no case shall the expenditure exceed the available balance in the fund. The County Administrator is authorized to transfer funds for supplemental retirement, Worker's Compensation, healthcare for retirees, cost related to the coordinated pay plan, and/or any amount of Insurance Reserve funds consistent with the County's Risk Management program to departments, as needed. The portion of the reserve for capital projects related to the school budget will be added to the reserve for future capital projects in the general fund; and will be designated for school projects. The County Administrator may appropriate revenues and increase expenditures in excess of $20,000 for funds received by the County from asset forfeitures for operating expenditures directly related to drug enforcement This applies to funds currently on-hand at June 30, 1999, and all funds received in the 1999-2000 budget year. The outstanding balance of these funds at June 30, 1999 or June 30, 2000 shall not lapse but be carried forward into the next fiscal year. The County Administrator may increase the general fund appropriation in the School Operating Fund, contingent upon availability of funds and taking into consideration any other expenditures which may have occurred, based on the following schedule: a) Increase general fund transfer/appropriation on December 15 by $1,500,000. b) Increase general fund transfer/appropriation on February 15 by $1,500,000. c) Increase general fund transfer/appropriation on April 15 by $1,500,000. APPENDIX H APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION Sec. 20 Sec. 21 Sec. 23 Subsequent to all audit adjustments, the County Administrator may increase appropriations or authorize transfers of existing appropriations at June 30. This includes the authority to designate aH available FY99 operating funds to the general fund Reserve for Capital Projects or for subsequent years appropriations, assuming ending general fund balance is maintained at a minium of 7.5% of general fund expenditures. The County Administrator is authorized to reallocate funding sources for Capital Projects, arbitrage rebates/penalties, and debt service payments and to appropriate bond interest earnings to minimize arbitrage rebates/penalties. This authority would include the appropriation of transfers among funds to accomplish such reallocations. Budgets for specific Capital Projects will not be increased beyond the level authorized by Sections3 and 4. This applies to funds currently on-hand in FY99, and all funds received in the 1999-2000 budget year. The County Administrator is authorized to transfer among appropriation categories any amount of funds associated with implementation of the Comprehensive Services Act for at-risk youth and families and funding assodated with the implementation of the VJCCCA Grant to record transactions. Salaries for Planning Commissioners will be increased equivalent to the increase given to all County employees. Effective upon adoption of this resolution, the County Administrator is authorized to approve transfers among funds as long as total net spending is not increased. The County Administrator shall have authority to appropriate actual State Compensation Board revenue and associated expenditures, when such revenue is provided for the purpose of funding new positions in Constitutional Officers' departments, provided that the Board of Supervisors has approved the creation of the new positions. Beginning with the FY97 budget and effective upon adoption of this resolution, the Utilities Department rate stabilization reserve shah be created and maintained as per guidelines outlined below: a) The minimum annual contribution to the reserve will be 50% of the previous year's depreciation on fixed assets. b) The annual contribution to the reserve will continue until 100% of accumulated depreciation on the fixed assets is funded. If at the beginning of a fiscal year a APPENDIX H APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION reserve balance exc~-'cds 100% of accumulated depreciation, a reduction in the annual contribution may be considered. c) Funds cannot be used from the rate stabilization reserve ff the balance falls below 25% of that utility's fixed asset accumulated depreciation. The declaration of a financial emergency by the Director of Utilities and a corresponding four-fifths vote by the Board of Supervisors at a publicly advertised meeting declaring the existence of such an emergency is required to suspend Sec. 23 a, Sec. 23 b, and Sec. 23 c. Effective with the FY2000 budget and effective upon adoption of this resolution, the School Board and/or the School Superintendent may make expenditure changes within the school appropriations as follows: a) Transfers of $20,000 or less are subject to the approval of the Superintendent. b) Transfers of $20,001 to $499,999 require the approval of the Superintendent and the School Board. c) Transfers of $500,000 or more require the approval of the Superintendent, the School Board, and the Board of Supervisors. The School Board and/or the School Superintendent shaU prepare a budget status report reflecting changes to the approved school budget between appropriation categories, as amended, and the report shall be presented to the County Administrator quarterly. The County Administrator is authorized to reclassify budgeted revenues, as appropriate, to reflect implementation of the State's Personal Property Tax Relief Act This applies to funds currently on-hand in FY99, and all funds received in the 1999- 2000 budget year. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 8. B. Subject: Deferred Streetlight Installation Approvals County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: This item requests Board approval of Deferred Streetlight Installations in the Matoaca District. Summary of Information: Streetlight requests from individual citizens or civic groups are received in the Department of Environmental Engineering. Staff requests cost quotations from Virginia Power for each request received. When the quotations are received, staff re-examines each request and presents them at the next available regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Staff provides the Board with an evaluation of each request based on the following criteria: Streetlights should be located at intersections; There should be a minimum average of 600 vehicles per day (VPD) passing the requested location if it is an intersection, or 400 VPD if the requested location is not an intersection; Petitions are required and should include 75% of residents within 200 feet of the requested location and if at an intersection, a majority of those residents immediately adjacent to the intersection. CONTINUED NEXT PAGE Preparer: ~' ~~¢ ~~ i~ic~r'd M. Mc~sh, P.E. Attachments: Yes ~ No Title: Director, Environmental Engineering CHESTERFIELD COUNTk BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page2 of 2 Summary of Information: (Continued) Cost quotations from Virginia Power are valid for a period of 60 days. The Board, upon presentation of the cost quotation may approve, defer, or deny the expenditure of funds for the streetlight installation. If the expenditure is approved, staff authorizes Virginia Power to install the streetlight. A denial will cancel the project and staff will so notify the requestor. A deferral will be brought before the Board again when specified. MATOACA DISTRICT. Deferred from the April 14, 1999 Board Meeting: Deer Run Drive and Buck Rub Drive, Deer Run Subdivision Cost to install light: $ 2914.07 Meets all minumum criterion Deer Run Drive and Key Deer Drive, Deer Run Subdivision Cost to install light: $ 2,764.51 Meets all minumum criterion Matoaca District Streetlight Funds Requested Balance Forward ~iture $26,294 $2,914 $2,765 Effective Remaining Balance $23,380 $20,615 STREETLIGHT REQUEST Matoaca District Request Received: Estimate Received: NAME OF REQUESTOR: ADDRESS: January 19, 1999 March 26, 1999 Estimate Requested: January 21, 1999 Days Estimate Outstanding: 64 Cost to install light: $ 2,914,07 Shelby Tusing 6904 Deer Run Land Midlothian, VA 23112 REQUESTED LOCATION IS THE INTERSECTION OF: Buck Rub Drive and Deer Run Drive POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles per Day: Petition: Staff or Requestor Comments: Req uestor states: REQUESTS ARE NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATIONS ARE: Qualified Qualified Qualified "This is a school bus stop and a very busy intersection." STREETLIGHT REQUEST Matoaca District Request Received: Estimate Received: NAME OF REQUESTOR: ADDRESS: January 19, 1999 March 26, 1999 Estimate Requested: January 21, 1999 Days Estimate Outstanding: 64 Cost to install light: $ 2,764,51 Shelby Tusing 6904 Deer Run Land Midlothian, VA 23112 REQUESTED LOCATION IS THE INTERSECTION OF: Deer Run Drive and Key Deer Drive POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles per Day: Petition: Staff or Requestor Comments: Req uestor states: REQUESTS ARE NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATIONS ARE: Qualified Qualified Qualified "This is a school bus stop and a very busy intersection." Street Light Request Map April 28, 1999 Street Light Legend ~ ~isting light ~ requested light This map shows clazen requested streetlight installations tn relation to exlstOtg strettlights. Existing streetlight Information was Environmental Engineering De~. Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Item Number: Subject: Appointment of Clerk to the Board of Supervisors County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Nominate and appoint Lisa Elko to serve as Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Summary_ of Information: Section 3.6 of the County Charter provides that the Board of Supervisor may appoint a Clerk. The County Administrator recommends that Lisa Elko be appointed as Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. Ms. Elko has been Acting Clerk since February 24, 1999. Her appointment would be effective on April 28, 1999 and she serves at the pleasure of the Board. Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Lane B. Ran~ Attachments: [] Yes W No Title: County Administrator 0800:44492.1 I# CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.1. Subject: Resolution Recognizing May 9-15, 1999 as'~ational Law Enforcement Week" County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: County staff will be presenting three of these resolutions -- Chesterfield County Police Department, Chesterfield County Sheriff's Department, and Virginia State Police on May 11, 1999 at the Law Enforcement Memorial Service at Southside Baptist Church. Preparer: Attachments: Colonel Carl R. Baker Yes N0 Title: Police Chief RECOGNIZING MAY 9-15, 1999 AS "NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT WEEK" WHEREAS, the dedicated, loyal, and brave members of Law Enforcement Agencies throughout the County provide an invaluable service to all citizens; and WHEREAS, the week of May 9-15, 1999, is recognized as "National Law Enforcement Week"; and WHEREAS, the County is proud and honored to have such outstanding and professional individuals as law enforcement officers in Chesterfield County who serve to protect health, safety, and welfare of its citizenry. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes the week of May 9-15, 1999 as "National Law Enforcement Week" in Chesterfield County and calls this recognition to the attention of all its citizens. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 2 Meeting Date: Item Number: 8 .D.2. Subject: Approve the Application for and Receipt of Grant Funds from the Department of Criminal Justice Services to Be Used to Implement a Mentoring Program for Youth Involved with the Courts. ,County Administrator0s Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested. Authorize Youth Services to apply for and receive $35,492 in grant funds from the Department of Criminal Justice Services and authorize an increase in appropriations by $35,492. Summary of Information- Youth Services requests approval to apply for and receive $35,492 in grant funds, from the Department of Criminal Justice Services. If approved, funds will be used to contract for the implementation of a one on one, intensive mentoring program targeted at youth who are involved with the court system. This twelve month grant will not require any county funding and no new county positions will be created as a result of the grant. Youth Services will serve as the fiscal manager of the grant funds. Jana D Carte~ --" "v Title:. Director, Youth Services Attachments: ["-'-~ Yes I No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: Aoril 28. 1999 Number Bud.qet and Mana,qement Comments: This item requests Board approval for the Department of Youth Services to apply for and appropriate, if received, grant funds from the Department of Criminal Justice Services not to exceed $35,492. If approved, these funds will be used to contract with Big Brothers and Big Sisters for the implementation of an intensive mentoring program targeted at youth who are involved with the court system. This is a twelve month grant beginning July 1, 1999. This grant requires no county funding and no new county positions will be created as a result of this grant. Preparer: ~~7-~)~P? Title:Director, Budget&Management Rebecca T. Dickson CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date:__A_~ril 28, x999 Item Number:~ Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along the West Line of Ironbridg~ Road from Brock's Properties, a Virginia General Partnership County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.0266 acres along the west right of way line of Ironbridge Road (State Route 10) from Brock's Properties, a Virginia general partnership, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. Summary_ of Information: It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. District: Matoaca John W. Harmon Attachments: Yes ~--~No Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer 096 VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF IRONBRIDGE ROAD FROM BROCK'S PROPERTIES Ironbridge PS COU~ yAflO RD Area Lan, IRONBRIDGJ ~ CeRP CTR Landing Dale INSUK L. D&:A~V 7t KENNETH W. IS GPIN 773-655-i99 NAD 83 BROCKS BAR-B-QUE BROCK'S PROPERTIES DEED BOOK 3179 PAGE 359 11310 IRONBRIDGE ROAD GPIN 773-656-8122 R=4-29.50' L=95.16' 39" 4-9'51 "W B' P C/L OF ~/w ~ 3656167.133 773:3999.639 Cl R=3887.72' L= 144.98' D=2'08'12" CHB=S6'40'O6"E CH = 144.97' 3656311,152 11773982.80' DEDICATION AREA: 1158 SQ.FT. ..0266 ACRE SCALE: 1"=40' ~)e P~ 8.00' 15' WATER EX. ROD 522'..~ TO.. LANDFILL .un. C2 /-PROPOSED R/W LINE EXISTING R/W LINE R=3879.72' L= 144.50' D=2'08' 12" CriB=S6'40'11 "E CH=144.50' STATE ROUTE 10 IRONBRIDGE ROAD VARIABLE WID-fH R/W PLAT SHOWING A PARCEL OF LAND TO BE DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF IRONBRIDGE ROAD MATOACA DISTRICT, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AUSTIN BROCKENBROUGH & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P. DATE: DECEMBER 31, 1998 CO. PROJ. NO. 98-0422 Po aox 4800 CHESTER VA. (804) 748-8746 REV: JANUARy 26, 1999 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 8. D. 3.b, Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along the South Line of Lady Marian Place from Queensmill Corporation County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.043 acres along the south right of way line of Lady Marian Place from Queensmill Corporation, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. Summary_ of Information: It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. District: Midlothian · Harmon Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer Attachments: Yes No VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LADY MARIAN PLACE FROM QUEENSMILL CORPORATION 100 \ \ 101 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 ofl Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land for Lake Chesdin C & R Realty, L.P. 8 .D.3.c. Parkway from County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 7.023 acres for Lake Chesdin Parkway from C & R Realty, L.P., and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. Summary of Information: This dedication is a requirement for the development of Chesdin Shores, Section 1. District: Matoaca Preparer: Jo~n~,~ "~. W. Harmon Attachments: Yes No Title: Riqht of Way Manager VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANC~! OF A PARCEl'. OF LAND FOR LAKE FROM C & R REALTY LP CHESDIN PARKWAY ,.-,] "u '~ o Lo4 0 / / / / EXISTING CHESDIN GREEN WAY 206 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 8.D. 4. Subject: Authorization for County Administrator to execute Memorandum Of Understanding with the Richmond Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, the County of Henrico, and the City of Richmond regarding care of homeless and stray animals. County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize County Administrator to execute the attached Memorandum Of Understanding ("Memorandum") between the Richmond Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ("RSPCA"), the County ofHenrico ("Henrico"), and the City of Richmond ("Richmond"). Summa~ of Information: The RSPCA intends to construct a new adoption center and clinic ("Adoption Center") for the care, sheltering, adoption and neutering of stray animals. The RSPCA recently approached the County, the City, and Henrico proposing an arrangement by which animals could be transferred from locality shelters to the RSPCA. The attached Memorandum, which has been negotiated by the RSPCA and the localities, addresses the Adoption Center concept and the sheltering, transportation, adoption, neutering and care of homeless and stray animals in the Richmond Metropolitan area. The Memorandum does not obligate the County to finance the capital or operating costs of the Adoption Center. The Memorandum encourages cooperation between the localities and the RSPCA. Among other things, it provides for the voluntary transfer of adoptable animals from the County shelter to the Adoption Center to facilitate public adoption of the animals. It also facilitates neutering ofadoptable animals by the RSPCA at the Adoption Center. The Memorandum does not obligate the County to transfer adoptable animals to the Adoption Center, although the County would have the option of doing so. Col. Carl R. Baker 1905:44176.1 Attachments: · Yes [] No i07 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Summary_ of Information: Staffbelieves that the Memorandum promotes a good working relationship with the RSPCA and the other localities. It also provides an outlet to reduce overcrowding of animals at the County shelter when the shelter is at full capacity. Staff recommends approval. WORKING DRAFT - 4/09/99 Memorandum of Understanding THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING is entered into by and between the Counties of Chesterfield, Henrico, and the City of Richmond (hereinafter, collectively referred to as the "Localities") and the Richmond Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, a Virginia non-profit corporation, also known as the Richmond SPCA and the Central Virginia Humane Society (hereinafter, collectively referred to as the "RSPCA"), as of this __ day of Month, 1999 for the purpose of memorializing the terms of the understanding between them regarding the future sheltering, transportation, adoption, neutering and care of homeless and stray animals in the metropolitan Richmond community; WHEREAS the RSPCA intends to construct a new adoption center (hereinafter referred to as the "Adoption Center") for the care, sheltering and adoption of homeless animals in the metropolitan Richmond community with an on-site clinic for the spaying and neutering of dogs, cats, puppies, kittens and certain other domesticated pets (hereinafter referred to as "neutering"), and associated veterinary care, (hereinafter referred to as the "Clinic"), and WHEREAS the Localities shall have no financial obligations whatsoever for the capital or operating costs of the Adoption Center or the Clinic but are supportive of the value of such facilities to the community and of the efforts of the RSPCA in establishing such facilities, and WHEREAS the Adoption Center will accept adoptable animals from various local public and private shelters, other humane organizations and members of the public for the purpose of caring for and making such pets available for adoption to responsible homes; and WHEREAS the Clinic will be available to neuter animals adopted from the Adoption Center or from any other shelter or other group or organization in Central Virginia as well as pets owned or brought in to the Clinic by area residents; WHEREAS the Localities require post-adoption animal sterilization through an adoption agreement between the respective Animal Control unit and the adopter of the animal; Therefore, in connection with the operation of the Adoption Center and the Clinic, the Localities and the RSPCA have a mutual understanding the complete terms of which are as follows: Davis, S.E. 04/09/99 Sheltering, Transfer and Adoption of Animals: Once the Adoption Center and the Clinic are open and fully operational (hereinafter referred to as the "Opening"), the RSPCA will accept transfer of adoptable animals offered to it by the Animal Control units of the Localities for sheltering and adoption of that animal to a home that meets the RSPCA's standards for adoption. From and after the second anniversary of the Opening, the RSPCA will shelter, and will not euthanize, all adoptable animals offered to the RSPCA by the Animal Control units of the Localities until such time as they are placed in a home meeting the RSPCA's standards for adoption. As used throughout this Memorandum of Understanding, the term "adoptable animal" shall refer to an animal that has no significant health or behavioral problem and that is not subject to a statutory holding period or to a pending court disposition and that is not legally underage for adoption. Each Locality and the RSPCA will work cooperatively and in good faith to determine which animals offered by that Locality meet this definition. However, in the event that the parties are unable to agree as to whether a particular animal qualifies as an adoptable animal, the final decision will be made by the RSPCA. There is no requirement hereunder that a Locality transfer any adoptable animals to the RSPCA, only the option that each of them may choose to do so. Each Locality may, and intends to, continue to adopt animals from its shelter facility, or during off-site adoption events, and shall remain free, in its discretion, to transfer adoptable animals to other humane organizations. The RSPCA shall also have the option, but not the obligation, of accepting transfer from any Locality of any animal that does not meet the definition of adoptable animal for the purpose of treating and/or rehabilitating that animal to become adoptable. If the RSPCA accepts the transfer of an animal that is not an adoptable animal, it will use all reasonable efforts to treat and rehabilitate such animal so as to bring it into an adoptable condition and to adopt it. All animals that are not adoptable animals because they are subject to a holding period or to a pending court disposition will be held by the respective Locality until such time as such issue has been resolved. Once the holding period has elapsed or the court proceeding has been resolved, an analysis will be made by the Locality and the RSPCA in accordance with paragraph 3 above of whether the animal is an adoptable animal and available for transfer to the RSPCA. Davis, S.E. 04/09/99 ilO II. 10. 11. 12. The RSPCA will have complete discretion (within the bounds of all applicable laws and regulations) to apply its own adoption policies, both objective and subjective, with respect to the placement of the animals following their transfer from the Localities to the RSPCA. The RSPCA will include a policy to allow for adopters to return within 30 days adopted RSPCA animals. The RSPCA will notify the appropriate Animal Control unit of any animal returned to the RSPCA that can not continued to be classified as adoptable. The appropriate Animal Control unit will be determined by the resident jurisdiction of the "adopter." The RSPCA and the appropriate Animal Control unit will arrange for the transfer of such animal to the Animal Control unit. The RSPCA will be free in its discretion to transfer to another humane organization any animal transferred to it from the Localities, but will do so only after such animal has been neutered. A regular and mutually convenient schedule of several days per week will be established for the RSPCA to come to the Locality animal shelters to accept transfer of animals and to receive any animals that are to be transported to the RSPCA Clinic for neutering (see Section II, Item 3 below). Each party will use its respective best efforts to adhere to the schedule established. The RSPCA will provide veterinary certification of neuter compliance to the Localities for all animals transferred under this agreement in the format required by the Locality. The Locality Shelters will maintain regular open to the public hours of operation and, during those hours, they will maintain an open admissions policy (meaning that they will accept all owner relinquished and stray animals brought by residents to their Locality). The Localities will maintain an animal emergency service policy that establishes prompt response to emergency calls 24 hours a day seven days a week. Adoptable animals may also be accepted directly by the RSPCA on a limited basis in accordance with its own established policies. Neutering Issues: The Clinic will, in addition to neutering prior to adoption all animals adopted at the Adoption Center, be open to the public as well as to any Locality shelter or other humane group in the area. Adopters from the Localities will be offered a price for the neutering surgery of adopted animals that is at least as low as that charged to any other local humane group or individual for his owned animal. Davis, S.E. 04/09/99 The Localities will maintain a neutering program, which complies with Article 6.1 of the Comprehensive Animal Laws of Virginia (Title 3.1, Chapter 27.4, Article 6.1 of the Code of Virginia 1950, as amended) or any successor provision, and will promote neutering and responsible pet ownership. Adopters of unneutered animals from Locality Shelters will be informed of the legal requirement that they neuter the pet within the prescribed time period and of the availability and location of the Clinic, among other alternatives, for the neutering of the pet. If an adopter chooses to use the Clinic and specifically requests, the RSPCA will transport adopted animals from the Locality shelter to the Clinic for neutering at a regularly scheduled time. Adopters may then pick up their animals at the Adoption Center following surgery and recovery. The Localities will maintain an enforcement process for compliance with the provisions of State required sterilization programs by all adopters from their Shelters. Localities may individually review implementation of a pre-adoption neutering plan as a part of their operational/budget planning. III. Release of Information: The content of any news release or other public statements about this Memorandum of Understanding or the content hereof will be prepared and released jointly. County of Chesterfield County of Henrico By: By: Title: Title: City of Richmond Richmond SPCA By: By: Title: Title: Davis, S.E. 04/09/99 112 · CHESTERFIELD COUNTY~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 1 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 8. D. 5. Subject: Street Name Change County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to approve renaming Blanchard Drive in Stonehenge Subdivision. Summary. of Information: The Department of Environmental Engineering received a request from Stonehenge Civic Association to rename Blanchard Drive to Edenberry Drive. Staff has confirmed that there are no existing homes addressed off Blanchard Drive and concur that for ease of traversing Stonehenge Subdivision the name change is necessary. Staff Recommendations: Recommend that the Board of Supervisors approve renaming Blanchard Drive, from Rexmoor Drive to Bondurant Drive in Stonehenge Subdivision, to Edenberry Drive. District: Clover Hill Preparer: Richard M. Mc~sh, P.E. Attachments: Yes ~ No Title: Director. Environmental Engineering Y~. cel Map of Chesterfield Cc Chesterfield County asstm'es no legal respom~ility for the infom-afioncontainodonthis map. ~ N map is not to be used for land conveyance. The horizontal data is based on the VA State Plane .Coordinate system, NAD 1983. The topographic infonmtion is based on 1989 photogtanm~ay and NAVD29. 100 0 100200 Feet Printed by: Environmental Engineering Date: Wed Apr 07 13:01:02 1999 Copyright 1999. Chesterfield County ~4 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page! of 1 Meeting Date: April 28~ 1999 Item Number: 8. D. 6. Subject: State Road Acceptance County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: MATOACA: Beckcnham, Section D Preparer: Attachments: RiChard M. ~If~s~-,-P.E. Yes [-~ No Title: Director. Environmental Engineering TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Depam-r~t of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - BECKENHAM, SEC. D DISTRICT: MATOACA MEETING DATE: 28 April 1999 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: INCHCAPE CT INCHCAPE RD Vicinity Map: BECKENHAM, SEC. D CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 2 Meetin~ Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.7.a. Subject: Request to Set a Public Hearing Date to Consider the Restriction of Through Truck Traffic on Beulah Ro ad County. Administrator's Comments: County. Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to set May 25, 1999, as a public hearing date to consider the restriction of through truck traffic on Beulah Road between Kingsland Road and Salem Church Road, and between Salem Church Road and Hopkins Road. Summary_ of Information: Staff'has received a request to restrict any through truck or truck and trailer or semi-trailer combination, except pickup or panel trucks, from using Beulah Road (Route 641) between Kingsland Road (Route 611) and Salem Church Road (642), and between Salem Church Road (642) and Hopkins Road (637). The recommended alternate route is Kingsland Road (Route 611), Route 10, Chippenham Parkway (Route 150), and Hopkins Road (Route 637). The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has five (5) criteria it considers when a restriction is requested. Based on staff's preliminary review, this request will satisfy two (2) of VDOT's five (5) criteria for imposing a restriction, in that: 1) the engineering of the roadway indicates that it is not suitable for truck traffic, and 2) there is a reasonable alternate route. This request will not meet the remaining three (3) criteria in that: 1) the route is not classified as a local or collector road, 2) the volume of through trucks does not exceed VDOT's 200 per day minimum volume, and 3) there are not 12 dwellings per 1000 feet of roadway along Beulah Road. A request that satisfies at least three (3) of VDOT's five (5) criteria will generally qualify for a restriction. Preparer: ~1'.~]~¢C/~~~.~ Title: R~ McCracken Agen3 8 8 Attachments: Yes [---] No Director of Transportation CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Summary. of Information: (Continued) Recommendation: Staffrecommends that the Board set May 25, 1999 as a public hearing date to consider a through truck traffic restriction on Beulah Road between Kingsland Road and Salem Church Road, and between Salem Church Road and Hopkins Road, and authorize the advertisement for that hearing. District: Dale RESTRICTIOn. ~F THROUGH'TRUCK TRAFFIC ~ ~ BEULAH ROAD · PROPOSED RESTRIC'I~_D R~ · - -" '" -'"' PROPOSED ALTERNATE ROUTE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: $.D. 7.b. Subject: Set A Public Hearing £or May 25, 1999 to Consider Adoption o£Ordinance Providing for Assessment of Partially Completed Buildings County_ Administrator's Comments: County/~dministrator: Board Action Requested: Set a public hearing for May 25, 1999 to Consider Adoption of'Ordinance Providing for Assessment of Partially Completed Buildings. Summa~ of Information: State law permits the County to reassess buildings at the end of the year if they are under construction as of January 1 st of the real estate tax year, but are completed by November 1 of'the tax year. The Board adopted a resolution in 1955 authorizing this approach of assessing buildings under construction. In such cases, the County has extended the deadline for payment of taxes based on such reassessments from December 5th to February 5th. The Assessor's Office has requested that the assessment process be codified in order to better inform the property owners in the County of the assessment process. The ordinance will have no impact on existing real estate or have any financial impact on the County. Staff recommends setting a public hearing for May 25th. Steven L. Micas 0614:44477. Attachments: · Yes [] No AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED BY ADDING SECTION 9-14.1 RELATING TO ASSESSMENT OF NEW BUILDINGS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 9-14.1 of the Code of the Coun~ o_f Chesterfield, 1997, as' amended, is added to read as follows: Sec. 9-14.1. Assessment of new buildings substantially completed. In accordance with Code of Virginia, § 58.1-3292, all new buildings substantially completed or fit for use and occupancy prior to November 1 of the year of completion shall be assessed by the assessor when such building is so completed or fit for use and occupancy. No partial assessment as provided herein shall become effective until information as to the date and amount of such assessment is recorded in the office of the treasurer and made available for public inspection. The taxes on any such new building for that year shall be the sum of(i) the tax upon the assessment of the completed building computed according to the ratio which the portion of the year such building is substantially completed or fit for use and occupancy bears to the entire year, and (ii) the taxes upon the assessment of such new building as it existed on January 1 of that assessment year, computed according to the ratio which the portion of the year such building was'not substantially competed or fit for use and occupancy bears to the entire year. With respect to any assessment made under this section after September 1 of any year, the penalty for nonpayment by December 5 provided in Section 9-16 shall be extended to February 5 of the succeeding year. (2) That this' ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 0600:44298.1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: April 9.8, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.7.c. Subject: Set a Public Hearing to Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domain for the Acquisition of Right of Way and Easements for Ashton Creek Business Center and Authorization to Enter and Take Such Property Prior to Eminent Domain Proceedings County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors set a public hearing for May 25, 1999, at 7:00 p.m. to consider the exercise of eminent domain for the acquisition of right of way and easements for Ashton Creek Business Center and authorization to enter and take such property prior to eminent domain proceedings. Summary_ of Information: On February 24, 1999, the Board of Supervisors authorized the Right of Way staff to assist Goodrich River Trust in the acquisition of right of way and easements for Ashton Creek Business Center. On April 15, 1999, an offer of $74,950.00 was made by the Right of Way Office to Roslyn Farm Corporation, a Virginia Corporation, for the purchase of 1.506 acres of right of way, a 16' sewer easement and two 10' temporary construction easements needed for road improvements to Ruffin Mill Road and extension of public sewer to Ashton Creek Business Center. The County has been unable to reach an agreement with R~slyn Farm Corporation for the necessary right of way and easements. It ms necessary to enter upon and take such property for a public purpose prior to the determination of just compensation in eminent domain proceedings. Authorization at a public hearing will allow the County to take immediate title to the property and will obligate the County to purchase the property sought. Staff will continue to negotiate with Roslyn Farm Corporation in an effort to reach a settlement Approval is recommended. ' Districts: Bermuda Preparer: ~*~~ ~e~..._ Dean R. Sasek Attachments: YeB No Title: Senior Riqht of Way Agent OLIVER D. RUDY, TRUSTEE DEED BOOK 2800, PG. 865 GPN# 812639179200000 #1211 RUFFIN MILL ROAD 107 ROSLYN FARM CORPORATION DEED BOOK 1252, PG. 558 GPN# 809656966900000 #17~ RUFFIN MILL ROAD I0· N 3637595.61 E 11810972.76 ~R=2829.79' 2,548.08' TO THE EAST LiNE OF PUFFIN MILL RD. STATE TRE. 746 YUKON ASSOCIATES DEED BOOK 2165, PG. 1544 GPN# 811657697800000 #940 PORT WALTHALL DRIVE CONSTRUCTION C/L ES.MT. TO P/L 249.03' ~. R=1467.-' N89'29'3~"E 364.03 TOTAL PORT. WALTHALL 70' R/W GRAPHIC SCALE 0 100 200 ~ DRIVE ATTN~ ( I~ t~) 1 iz:mh = 200 IL PLAT SHO~/ING A 16' SANITAF SE~/ER AN]} T~/D 10' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS ACROSS THE PROPERTY BF RBSLYN FARM CORPORATION BERMUDA DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD CBUNTY, VIRGIF SCALE , l' = PO0' APRIL t, 1999 REVISE])~ APRIL 6, 1999 CHARLES C. Tn~/NES 8, ASSrlCIATEg, P.C. CIVIL ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - LAND SURVEYORS 9850 LDRI ROAD, SUITE CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 748-9011 L DRAVN ]]Y GHB/PAH FB APPROVED BY CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date:__ ~_April 2~_,_ 1999 Item Number: 8. D. 7. d. Subject: set a Public Hearing to Consider the Leasing of County Property County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors set a public hearing for May 25, 1999, at 7:00 p.m. to consider the leasing of County property at the Bellwood and Clover Hill water tanks to Triton PCS Company L.L.C. Summary_ of Information: On November 12, 1999 the Board of Supervisors authorized Triton PCS to apply for necessary approvals to install communications equipment on County Property at the Bellwood and Clover Hill water tanks. All approvals have been obtained. A public hearing is required to lease the property. Districts: Bermuda Clover Hill John W. Harmon Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer Attach_merits: No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: $. 13.7 Subject: Set a Public Hearing Date to Consider the Conveyance of Lease of Real Property at Woodlake Athletic Complex for Operation of Food Concessions by Midlothian Youth Soccer League County_ Adminis~rator'~ Comments~ County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to set a public hearing date of May 25, 1999 to consider the conveyance of lease of real property for operation of food concessions at Woodlake Athletic Complex. Summary of Information: In the past, the concession facilities have been operated by cosponsored athletic associations or leagues that use the adjoining ballfields. Midlothian Youth Soccer League has expressed an interest to lease the concession facility at Woodlake Athletic Complex. Midlothian Youth Soccer League is the primary user of this facility and would benefit from this 19ase agreement. The terms o£the new lease will be June 1, 1999 - December 31, 2000. The public hearing and approval of the Board is necessary to execute the lease agreement. Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this request. Preparer: ~,~~ne~n~C~ _ Title: Michael S Go"~e~ -- Director, Parks and Recreation Attachments: Yes ~ No LEASE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this __ day of , 199__~, by and between the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA ("Lessor") and ("Lessee"). WHEREAS, the Lessor owns and operates a recreational park in Chesterfield County, Virginia, known as ., located in District, in which there has been constructed a concession facility, and WHEREAS, Lessee desires to operate the concession facility to offer food, beverages and other products to the general public using such facility. WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, Lessor hereby grants and the Lessee hereby accepts a nonexclusive lease to operate the concession facility located at upon the following terms and conditions: 1. The lease herein granted shall be effective for a period of three (3) years, commencing on January 1, __ and ending December 31, __ unless terminated sooner by Lessor due to any default by the Lessee which is not cured within thirty days a~er Lessee receives written notice of such default. 2. Lessee shall pay to Lessor a sum equal to twelve percent (12%) of the gross receipts from all concession sales, including credit sales, and said payment shall be made payable to the Treasurer of the County of Chesterfield and delivered to the Director of Parks and Recreation, County of Chesterfield, Virginia, ("Director"), on December 31 of the current year. In the event that Lessee makes such payments on or before December 31 of the current year, Lessee shall receive a 0607:21140.1 -1- discount equal to two percent (2%) of all concession sales, including credit sales; provided, however, that Lessor, upon giving Lessee thirty (30) days written notice, may increase the percentage of gross receipts payable to Lessor to the level Lessor deems necessary to cover Lessor's actual costs relating to the operation and maintenance of the concession facility. 3. By acceptance of this Lease, Lessee covenants with Lessor the following: a. To pay rent promptly as established herein. b. To keep and maintain separate, adequate books and records pursuant to the operation of the concession facility. Said books and records shall be submitted to the Director along with the December 31 payment in each current year. c. To submit, at reasonable times when requested by the Parks and Recreation Department of the County of Chesterfield, ("Department"), all books and records pursuant to the operation of the concession facility. d. To submit to the Director along with the December 31 payment in each current year, an annual financial report of all receipts and disbursements pursuant to operation of the concession facility. e. To install, at the Lessee's expense, all necessary equipment, approved for operation of the concession facility and to keep same adequately staffed during by Lessor, business hours. f. To keep and maintain the concession facility and appurtenances thereto neat, clean, and in good state of repair; normal wear and tear excepted. g. To secure and keep current all necessary health and sanitation permits required by law, and any and all other licenses or permits as may be necessary or required by law for 0607:21140.1 -2- the operation of the concession facility. h. To secure and keep in force adequate fire and hazard insurance upon the contents, and public liability insurance naming the County as co-insured in an amount not less than $500,000, and to provide the Director with a Certificate of Insurance which indicates that County is so named and so insured. i. To indemnify and hold Lessor harmless from any and all claims, suits, damages, costs and expenses arising out of or in any way relating to Lessee's conduct and operation of the concession facility, and from any damages, claims or suits based on personal injury or property damage caused by Lessee's negligence. j. To keep the area in and around the immediate vicinity of the concession building free of litter and debris. k. To file for the Director's approval, a schedule of items to be sold for human consumption and the prices to be charged, prior to the commencement of operation. Upon approval, neither the items to be sold nor the prices shall be altered, amended or modified without prior approval of the Director. I. To immediately report any theft of merchandise, personal property, cash, checks or credit slips to the police and the Director. m. To assist in the conservation of energy by shutting down all major equipment during the off' season. 4. Lessor and Lessee mutually covenant and agree that: a. Lessee has inspected the concession facility and agrees to accept same in its condition as of the date of this contract. Lessee shall not make any alterations or additions to 0607:21140.1 -3- the leased premises without the prior written consent of Lessor. All alterations, changes and improvements built, constructed or placed on the leased premises by Lessee, with the exception of fixtures removable without damage to the premises and movable personal property shall, unless otherwise provided by written agreement between Lessor and Lessee, become the property of the Lessor and remain on the demised premises at the expiration or sooner termination of the Lease. Lessee agrees that the cost of any replacement keys and changing of locks after Lessor's initial provision of same will be borne by Lessee. b. Lessor shall not be liable for damage to any property or injury to any person in, on or about the concession facility from any cause whatsoever. c. Lessor shall have access to concession facility at all times, and shall have first priority for use of said facility in the event of a scheduling conflict between Lessee and Lessor. Lessor shall give Lessee at least 30 days' notice of Lessor's intent to use said facility. d. Lessor shall provide, without additional cost to Lessee, electricity, water and sewer facilities, and regular trash collection. e. Lessee shall not assign this Lease nor sublease the Leased Premises without the prior written consent of Lessor, which will not be unreasonably withheld. Any attempted sublease or assignment without the consent of the Lessor shall be void and of no force or effect. f. All items of indebtedness or damage under these covenants shall be considered as items of rent and Lessor shall have the same liens and the same remedies for the collection thereof as are provided herein and by law for the collection of rent. g. Upon the breach of any covenant contained herein or the abandonment or vacation of the premises by the Lessee, or the failure to provide the required Certificate of 0607:21140.1 -4- Insurance, books, records, financial reports or payments, the Lessor may, at its option, immediately terminate this Lease, and shall have the right to enter the premises at once and take possession thereof, including improvements erected thereon. Such termination or possession, however, shall not deprive the Lessor of any other action or remedy for possession, rent or damages. h. In the event the demised premises are condemned, in whole or in part, or otherwise acquired by a public authority, this Lease, at the option of the Lessee, may thereupon be terminated and the Lessor shall not be liable for any inconvenience or damage to the Lessee cased thereby. The Lessor reserves the right to condemn as provided by law and such action by the Lessor shall constitute a means for termination of this Lease without penalty. 5. Lessor and Lessee agree that this Agreement constitutes the entire agreement, understanding and representation, express or implied, between the parties. This Agreement supersedes all prior written or oral agreements or proposals between the parties. 6. This Agreement shall be governed by the terms herein. Any dispute concerning this Agreement shall be resolved in the Circuit Court of the County of Chesterfield. This Agreement is deemed to have been made in Virginia and shall be construed under the laws of Virginia. 7. This contract is expressly contingent upon the approval of a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, which approves this contract and authorizes its execution by the County Administrator. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: 0607:21140.1 -5- LES SOR: COUNTY OF CI--[ESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA By: Lane B. Ramsey County Administrator Approved as to form: Michael S. J. Chemau Assistant County Attorney LESSEE: ATTEST: By: Title: 0607:21140.1 -6- Meetin9 Date: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA April 28r 1999 Item Number: Page 1 of 2 8.D.7.f. Subiect: Set Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance Amendment relating to Business License Fees County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested. Set a Public Hearing for May 25, 1999 to Consider an Ordinance Amendment Relating to Business License Fees Summary of Information: On March 18, 1999, the County Administrator forwarded to the Board of Supervisors a memorandum outlining an option to limit BPOL revenue. Mr. Warren has requested a public hearing for May 25 to consider ordinance amendments as outlined in this memorandum. The proposal presented (attached) would reduce January 2000 rates by 10% in the Personal and Business Services and Commission Merchant categories (from $.36 to $.32) and in the Professional Services category (from $.58 to $.52). These changes are expected to result in a reduction to the estimated BPOL revenue which, when coupled with expected growth in the various classification categories, is projected to yield about the same BPOL revenue in FY2000 as is expected in FY99. Reductions in these categories would impact a large number of various types of businesses and would begin to move the County's rates closer to Henrico's. Rate reductions are not proposed in the contractor, Preparer: ~~'° ~'-7/-~/~/~.~.1 Title: Director, Budqet & Management Rebecca T. Dickson Attachments: Yes ~-~No # Meeting Date: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA April 28, 1999 Page 2 of 2 Item Number: Summary of Information (cont.): retail and wholesale merchant categories. Currently, these rates are similar to Henrico's and are lower than the County's other rates. The proposed rate reductions are expected to result in approximately $571,000 less in BPOL revenue in FY2000 than was budgeted. Unallocated monies in the FY2000 proposed budget have been identified to accommodate this change. 'E Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Item Number: Page 1 of 1 8.D.7.g. Subject: Set a Public Hearing to Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domain for the Acquisition of Right of Way and Easements for Loft Road Relocated and Authorization to Enter and Take Such Property Prior to Eminent Domain Proceedings County_ Administrator's Comments, County Administrator: Board Action Requested' Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors set a public hearing for May 25, 1999, to consider the exercise of eminent domain for the acquisition of right of way and easements for construction of Lori Road Relocated and authorization to enter and take such property prior to eminent domain Summary of information: Access to the new juvenile court building will be provided by the construction of Jury Drive to Route 10. In order to construct Jury Drive, a section of Lori Road will have to be relocated. The relocation of Lori Road will necessitate the acquisition of approximately 0.854 acre of right of way from Myers Family Partnership, L.P. Knight Dorin and Rountree, the County's right of way acquisition consultant, has made an offer to Myers for the purchase of the right of way. The County has been unable to reach an agreement with Myers to this point but is still continuing negotiations and hopes to reach a settlement. The road construction contract for Jury Drive and Loft Road Relocated has been advertised for bids. To insure the.road construction proceeds in a timely manner, fight of way IrtUSt be acquired. It is necessary to enter upon and take such property for a public purpose prior to the determination of just compensation in eminent domain ~roceedings. Authorization at a public hearing will allow the County to take immediate title to the property and will obligate the County to purchase such property. Staffwill continue to negotiate with Myers in an effort to reach a settlement. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board set May 25, 1999, as the public hearing date to consider the exercise of eminent domain for the acquisition of fight of way and easements for Loft Road Relocated and authorization to enter and take such property prior to eminent domain proceedings. District: Dale Preparer: .~.j.~~ ~ Title: Director of Transportation McCracken · Agen394 Attachments: Yes ~ No C~YO~ ~DC2t;~ NO~JI CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.8.a. Subject: Transfer $3,500 from the Dale District Three Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department to Cover Cost of the Meadowdale Area Summer Day Camp Program County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Transfer $3,500 from the Dale District Three Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department to cover costs of the Meadowdale Area summer day camp program. Summary_ of Information: The Parks and Recreation Department operates various summer day camp programs in the County. The Department was recently contacted by the Meadowdale Area Community Council and requested to operate a program in the Meadowdale area. Approximately $3,500 will be required to offset the Department's costs to operate the camp. The Department expects to hold the camp for two weeks in July. The camp wiI1 serve children from ages 6 to 12. This is an appropriate use of public funds since the funds will be used to expand an existing County program. The balance in the Dale District Three Cent Road Fund account is $34,624; use of $3,500 for this request as well as $3,000 for bleachers at Falling Creek Middle School will leave an available balance of $28,124. Preparer: Rebecca Dickson Title: Director, Budget and Management 0421:44528.1 Attachments: [] Yes [] No I # ~'~71 THREE CENT ROAD FUND APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with Three Cent Road Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as Three Cent Road Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application ) What is the amount of funding you are seeking? Describe in detail the funding request and .h55the money, if approved, will be spent. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? 0407:23380.1 '7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Is the organization non-profit? Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes No Yes ~-~ No Yes ~ No Page 2 What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? What is the telephone number, fax number, e-mail address of the applicant? Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairman or vice- chairman of the organization. Htle (if signing on behalf of an organization) Printed Name 0407:23380. I CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 8.D. 8.b. Subject: Transfer $3,000 in Dale District Three Cent Road Funds to the Parks and Recreation Department to Purchase and Install Bleachers at Falling Creek Middle School County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Transfer $3,000 in Dale District Three Cent Road Funds to the Parks and Recreation Department to be used to purchase and install bleachers at Falling Creek Middle School. Summa~ of Information: Supervisor Daniel requests that the Board transfer $3,000 from the Dale District Three Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department to purchase and install aluminum "tip-n-roll" bleachers at Falling Creek Middle School. The bleachers will be installed in the school gym and will replace existing wooden bleachers which are in poor condition. This is an appropriate use of public funds since the bleachers will improve County property. The balance in the Dale District Three Cent Road Fund account is $34,624; use of $3,000 for this request as well as $3,500 for the Meadowdale Area Summer Day Camp Program will leave an available balance of $28,124. Preparer: Rebecca Dickson Attachments: · Yes [] No Title: 0421:44533.1 Director, Budget and Management i40 1 THREE CENT ROAD FUND APPLICATIOFI This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with Three Cent Road Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. C Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the ounty to give public funds, such as Three Cent Road Fund,s., to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may precJude the County s Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application.) What is the amount of funding you are seeking? Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent..-~ ~~'~E Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? 0407:23380.1 141 Page 2 If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Is the organization non-profit? Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes No Yes ~ No Yes ~ No What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? What is the telephone number, fax number, e-mail address of the applicant? Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairman or vice- chairman of the organization. Signat~ - Title (if signing on behalf of an organization} Printed Name 0407:23380.1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 8.13.9. Subject: Request for a Permit to Stage a Fireworks Display at the Chesterfield County Fairgrounds on July 4, 1999. County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: Summary_ of Information: The Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation Department has requested permission from the Board of Supervisors to stage a fireworks display at the Chesterfield County Fairgrounds on July 4, 1999, with no rain date. The Parks and Recreation Department has conducted similar displays on the same property each year for the last nine years without incident. The fireworks supplier, Dominion Fireworks, Inc., has obtained a liability insurance policy naming the County of Chesterfield as an additional insured party in the amount of $1,000,000, which has been approved by Risk Management. Lt. James R. Picard of the Fire Prevention Bureau reviewed this fireworks request and indicated that it meets the criteria under the Fire Prevention Code. The cost of the fireworks event for the year's program will be paid by donations from Comcast Cablevision, Ukrops, Athletes-In- Motion and the Midlothian Rotary. Steven L. Micas 1205:44381.1 Attachments: · Yes [] No I # ~4Lt I Application for Fireworks Display (Print or Type All Information) Date of Application: ~(t~ lb, EventName: '~r-o~,..~4~ ~ ~2~ Time of Fireworks: Q'3D pa., Rain Date: Event Location: e~e ~ze-L3, ~_/~ ~ ~,~)~v.~ Shooting site/Display area: Sponsoring Organization: Person In Charge of Event: (ii~clude map) Mailing Address: City: O__~' ~:~,~[Q Work Phone: "l State: ~&. Zip: Home Phone: 23~- Person Coordinating Fireworks: (for the sponsor) Mailing Address: City: Work Phone: State: Va-. Zip: I-3o~e Phone: '~ "l Company Responsible for Shooting:. Mailing Address: City: Work Phone: Shooters Name: State: Nb_. After Hours: Zip: 7)-.Zga S - l lqc i44 Note: 1. 2. 3. Date: Attach a list of fireworks to be used in the display. Attach a copy of the certificate of insurance. Include a site drawing noting discharge site, spectator viewing area, parking, and any nearby structures. Should you have any questions, call the Fire and Life Safety Division at 748-1426. Return application to: Chesterfield Fire Department Fire and Life Safety P. O. Box 40 Chesterfield, VA 23832 3]10 jqq Applicant's Signature: f~ ~-~ Print Name: ~J~Pcc~t~ff: _~__. L~t3vi ~-~, (office use only) emarks: Site suitable for display pending County Attorney and Board of Supervisors approval. Site unsuitable. Fire Officia~~J~.~ Event Representative: Date:.~~ Date: o~ KRAUSE .RD. 440-248-4711 THiS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION Britton-Gallegher & Assoc. ONLY AND CO~RS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE 6240 SOM Center Rd. "'" HOLDER. THIS ~,,""~IFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR Cleveland, OH 44139-298~) _ ALTER THE CO¥', ,,GE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES J)ELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVE.RAGE COMPANY ~SURED A Lexington Insurance Co. - COMPANY Dominion Fireworks,. Inc. -.'~. ,::".' ' B Granite State Insurance Co, P. O. Box 3015 "" COMPANY Petersburg VA 23805 c COMPANY THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICrES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, ~ EXCLUSIONS AND. CONDITIONS OF SUCH. POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. cO LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POUCY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION , DATE IMM/DD/YY) DATE ~MtDO/YY LIMIT~ A C~",':-',',AL UAmUTY 8534963 3/23/99 3/23/00 ._GENERAL AGGREGATE i . :~000000 X CO,MERCI^' G~NE,~ U^a~UTY . '~---~ j~ PRODUCTS* COMP~OP ^O~ ' 2O00000 PERSONAL & AOV INJURY ~ 1000000 OWNF. a's & CONTRACTOR'S PROT ...... ' .E_A..C~. OCcURRE..N.CE * 1000~0.0. -- FiRE DAMAGE (A_n_v~e rite} $ .. 50000 . ~ MED EXP {Any one p?re.onl t .. 9 A?OMOelLa L!.~!LFI'Y 002423 3/23/99 3/23/00 X ANY AUTO COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT II ~ 1000000 ALL OWNED AUTOS ..... ~CHEDU(.ED AUTOS ' BODILY INJURY X HIRED AUTOS -- BODILY INJURY .~X NON-OWNED AUTOS [Pet lc¢ld~nll PROPERTY DAI~4AGE GARAGE UASIUTY .... "' ~ _~uTo O.NLV · ,~ ^CC~DE,~ ANY AUTO ~ OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY: ... ~ACH A.CClDENT I .. ...... . AGGREGATE A txcEsa u~,~'y 5640656 3123/99 ~123/00 EACH OCCURRENCE ..... $ . 4000000 - X~ UMaRELL~ FORM AGGR~AI'E t 4000000 ~ OTH~ TH~N UMSRa. LA WORKERS COMPENSATION AND WC'$TATU. IOETRH-: ..' EMPLOYERS' LIAalLITY TORY L MITS "!:~'. ;':,-' :' '  EL EACH ACCIDENT THE PROPRIETOR/ INCL PARTNERS/EXECUTIVI; ~.L DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT OFFICER8 ARE: E, XCL ,, EL OISEASE o EA EMPLOYEE OTHER .... DE;CRiP~iON OF OPEflATIONI/LOCATtON$/VEI~IOLESlSPECIAL iTEMS DATE OF DISPLAY~ JULY 4,1999 ADDITIONAL INSURED: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA. #2 CHESTERFIELD RAIN DATE~ NEXT CLEAR DATE COUNTY FAIR, VA. LCCATION: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS,VA. ............. . ......... . ............................ ,,:.::-:.:.:,.~ ,:..-:,.,.,:.:.:,:~,:.:,:., ::r'~:.~,.~.,~,,~=.~=+~,.,,~.~.~ .,.: ~ ,,.' ~ ~ ~,~ ~..'.,.~: :::~ &.~: :!:~.,':: ::'. ~i~,~ ~ ~:i?~,.~:'.,':::.~ %~.".~ :! ~..'.;:i~',~i~.,'~ i~.,'.'i:~!~!~,'.:.<:!~i!~',5.'.i%:.~! CHESrl~REJ:]~.,D COUN'Z'~, VTRG]:NTA SHOUm A~V OF T~E AaOVE OESCR~EEO ~,ouc~a E,, CANCEtLE~ aEeo. E T~E PARKS & RECREATION DEPARIHENT , EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO M,AJL ~r~,O, .1~:~'4~' ~O : _ ~O: DAy,~ WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTk~ICAT.· HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, CHF--STERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 ' CUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NO. TljC:~."~T~E',I,IVIPOSE NO OBLIOAT,ON OR LIABILITY ~',,~ ~ //~'~'~,NO UPON 'T.HE/~(~I~PANY, ,T~ ~NTS OR 147 JUL~,Y 4TM , 1999 FIREWORK DISgLAY INVENTORY SIZE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 3 INCH 250 ASSORTED 4 INCH 125 ASSORTED 5 INCH 60 ASSORTED 6 INCH 50 ASSORTED THE GRAND FINALE WILL CONSIST OF AN ADDITIONAL 300 3 INCH COLOR & SALUTE SHELLS 10 4 INCH COLOR, 10 5 INCH COLOR AND 3 6 INCH COLOR SHELLS CHAINED TOGETHER. INSURANCE LIMITS: FIVE MILLION DOLLARS DOMINION FIREWORKS, INC. ESTABLISHED 1984 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: $ · 13.10. Subject: Request for Music/Entertainment Festival Permit for ACE Celebration on May 12, 1999 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board grant a musical/entertainment festival permit to the County Administrator. Summary_ of Information: The County Administrator proposes to conduct an outdoor festival for the purpose of celebrating the County' s receiving the Award for Continuing Excellence ("ACE"). The coveted ACE award recognizes continued excellence for organizations that have already received the Senate Productivity Quality Award ("SPQA"). Because the celebration will include musical renditions conducted in open spaces not within a permanent enclosed structure, the County Administrator has applied for a Musical/Entertainment Festival Permit pursuant to §3-12 of the County Code. The event is planned to occur in the open lawn area in front of the Old Historic Courthouse. The event will begin at 11:3 0 and will continue until 2:00 p.m. A free lunch will be served, along with musical entertainment and prizes. The County Administrator expects about 1,000 people to attend at the Old Historic Courthouse. Special arrangements are being made to reach off-site employees so that they may share in the ACE celebration. In the event of rain, the ACE celebration will be held on May 14, 1999. Steven L. Micas 1221:44485. Attachments: Z]Yes 1No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: $.D. 11. Subject: Designation of Right of Way and Easements for Lake Chesdin Parkway County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board designate a 0.499 acre parcel of County property as right of way; and, a variable width VDOT slope and drainage easement for Lake Chesdin Parkway, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary Declaration. Summary_ of Information: Prior to accepting roads into the secondary maintenance system, VDOT requires that the County designate right of way and record plats showing the necessary right of way and easements. After recordation of the Declaration and construction of the road, a resolution for road acceptance can be submitted. District: Matoaca John W. Harmon Attachments: No Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer ~50 VICINITY SKETCH DESIGNATION OF RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENTS FOR LAKE CHESDIN PARKWAY :~z b tl U CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page __ 1 ofl Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: Subject: Designation of Right of Way for Jury Drive 8.D.12. County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board designate a 3.059 acre parcel and a 0.239 acre parcel of County property as right of way; for Jury Drive, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary Declaration· Summary_ of Information: Prior to accepting roads into the secondary maintenance system, VDOT requires that the County designate right of way and record plats showingI the necessary right of way. After recordation of the Declaration andl construction of the road, a resolution for road acceptance can be submitted. District: Dale · Harmon Attachments: YesI Title: Right of Way Manaqer 154 Center DEERFIELD '~,LUFFg Juve~ tr Ironbridge COURT DEERWATI terfield Lloyd &~dws ~' I 0 LL'I- Sa~¥N~/I~ NO~,3FI;~J.SI~03 · S. LN¥~gf~HO0 SI~-41S~,S NOLL¥1~I~tO:INI 31Hd~)03~3 * ~LSIIN3r3s 3Y/N3rINO)41AN-~ * S/33J-IH3~l¥ 3d¥3SQNV-I · SaOX3Aal~ · Sa-~3NION3 lo6 ~ z I1~ o-~ II~ ~F~II~ :~ '~ o/1~ lift I CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meetin~l Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: Subject: Request to Change New Year's Holiday 8.D.13. County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Change the previously approved New Year's Holiday from Friday, December 31, 1999 to Monday, January 3, 2000. Summary of Information: The County has identified Y2K systems issues and continues to prepare for the Y2K transition. It is anticipated that the transition will take place without system failures or interruptions to County services. However, to be prepared for unforeseen challenges and in light of the possibility that systems related problems may arise, it is recommended that the New Year's Holiday previously approved for Friday, December 31, 1999 be changed to Monday, January 3, 2000. This would ensure there is sufficient time to recover from potential systems issues. J. (~rner' - ~ - Attachments: [----] Yes Title: Director, Human Resource Mgt. No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 10.^. Su~ect: Status of General Fund Balance, District Road and Street Light County Administrator's Commen~: Reserve for Future Capital Funds, and Lease Purchases Projects, County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Preparer: ~- /'~ Ra~msey~~ ' Lane Bi Attachments: Yes --'-I N Title: County Administrator # CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GENERAL FUND BALANCE April 22, 1999 BOARD MEETING DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT BALANCE 07/01/98 FY99 Actual Beginning Fund Balance $33,760,968 10/28/98 Designation of FY98 expenditure savings to address County Unified Pay Plan in future years (1,885,893) $31,875,075 10/28/98 Reappropriation of FY98 expenditure savings to the Fire Department for use in FY99 (141,300) $31,733,775 10/28/98 Designate net school FY98 expenditure savings for school uses (2,092,918) $29,640,857 10/28/98 11/12/98 Reappropriation of FY98 County expenditure savings for Unified Pay Plan in FY99 (700,000) $28,940,857 Board Meeting Date ""' CHESTERFIELD COUNTY '~ RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS TRADITIONALLY FUNDED BY DEBT April 22, 1999 Description Amount FOR FISCAL YEAR '99 BEGINNING JULY 1, 1998 4/8/98 FY99 Budgeted Addition 8,150,000 4/8/98 FY99 Capital Projects (5,918,800) 6/24/98 Transfer for Clover Hill Sports Complex, Phase II acceleration of soccer fields, baseball fields, and parking (460,000) 7/29/98 File tracking system in Clerk of Circuit Court's office (50,000) 8/20/98 Designation for potential reduction in grant funds for the Henricus Land purchase (230,000) 10/14/98 Transfer for construction of Phase II of Public Safety Training Center at Enon (70,000) 10/28/98 Transfer funds for County match of DCJS grant for Criminal History Record System Improvement to provide video arraignment capabilities. (contingent upon grant approval) (74,977) 11/12/98 Transfer funds to the Chesterfield Historical Society for museum improvements for the County's 250th anniversary (38,0o0) 11/24/98 Transfer funds to County Capital Projects to fund construction of soccer field lighting at Manchester Middle School (5o, ooo) 11/24/98 Transfer funds to cover costs of security system for Information Systems Technology. (115,000) Balance 8,411,790 2,492,990 2,032,990 1,982,990 1,752,990 1,682,990 1,608,013 1,570,013 1,520,013 1,405,013 Board Meeting Date 12/16/98 1/27/99 2/10/99 2/24/99 2/24/99 3/24/99 3/24/99 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS TRADITIONALLY FUNDED BY DEBT April 22, 1999 Description Designation for FY2000 road projects local match: Walton Park Sidewalk Point of Rocks Road Bike Trail, Phase I Centre Street Streetlight Cogbill Road Sidewalk Salem Church Road Sidewalk Designation for potential expenses related to the Year 2000 project Transfer funds to bury overhead utility lines along Jury Drive Transfer for Circuit/General District Courthouse space needs assessment Transfer for requirements analysis for the financial and human resources/payroll system Transfer for design/engineering of baseball/ softball fields to be constructed at Goyne Park. Transfer for re-construction of boardwalk at Point of Rocks Park. Amount (52,800) (48,000) (8,ooo) (26,000) (15,2oo) (150,000) (lOO,OOO) (75,000) (150,000) (5o, ooo) (80,000) Balance 1,255,013 1,105,013 1,005,013 930,013 780,013 730,013 650,013 4/14/99 Transfer to the Public Safety Training Center Project in Enon for bid award for range floor (65,000) 585,013 ©< Prepared by Accounting Department March 31, 1999 SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES Date Original Began Description Amount 12/88 '12/93 09/96 APPROVED ANDEXECUTED Airport State Police Hangar Additions $128,800 County Warehouse 331,200 Total 460,000 Real Property Lease/ Purchase School Te~lmical Center Printing Press Date Ends 12/00 Outstanding Balance 03/31/99 $ 29,745 76,486 106,231 17,510,000 12/01 6,990,000 80,649 11/99 14,060 TOTAL APPROVED AND EXECUTED $18.050.64~9 $7.110.29~1 PENDING EXECUTION Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation - Certificates of Participation - $26.8 million Approved August 27, 1997 *Second Refunding of Certificates of Participation, Series 1985 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page ! of ~ Meetin~Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 10. B. Report On: Developer Water and Sewer Contracts Background: The Board of Supervisors has authorized the County Administrator to execute water and/or sewer contracts between the County and the Developer where there are no County funds involved. The report is submitted to the Board members as information. Summary of Information: The following water and sewer contracts were executed by the County Administrator: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: County Administrator: Attachments: 97-0125 Ashley Forest, Section B Westbridge Development, Inc. Piedmont Construction Company Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Bermuda Prepared By: Yes No $65,545.00 $123,002.10 Agenda Item April 28, 1999 Page 2 Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 97-0287 Jessup Farms, Section A (Lot 4, Block A) and Section B (Lot 5, Block A) Brookstone Associates L.C. Excalibur Construction Corporation Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Dale $12,260.00 $20,395.00 Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 98-0413 The Grove - Biggin Pond, Section 2 The Grove, L.P. Piedmont Construction Company, Inc. Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Midlothian $22,659.00 $32,464.00 o Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 99-0014 Eternal Technology at Touchstone Drive Eternal Technology Corporation Castle Equipment Corporation Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Bermuda $72,409.55 $31,293.92 166 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 10.C. Subject: Roads Accepted into the State County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Secondary System Board Action Requested: Summary of Information' Lisa H. Elko Attachments: Ycs -~No Title: Acting Clerk to the Board 167 c:; c::; c::; o o o ~ o 0 Oh 0', 0 · -~ ~. 0 ~ o. ,- "!. o o 0 0 > 0 ~70 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 11. Subject: EXECUTIVE SESSION County Administrator's Comments: Count3/Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary_ of Information: Executive Session, pursuant to § 2.1-344(a)(7), Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, for consultation with legal counsel regarding specific legal matters relating to the amortization of billboards and trespass on County rights of way and County v. Spencer. Steven L. Micas Attachments: [] Yes · No Title: County Attorney 0800:44301.1 I# CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 15. A. '1. Subject: Resolution Recognizing the 1999 Minor Division of Champions in the Chesterfield Boys Basketball League County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached Resolution Summary_ of Information: Mr. Daniel requested that the attached Resolution be adopted. In recognition of the superb efforts of the Harrowgate Eagles, and Coach Lawrence Mines, in winning the Minor NCAA County championship by defeating the Chalkley Lakers with a score of 35 to 30 at Manchester High School on March 13, 1999. Attachments: Yes ~-~ No Director, Public Affairs # 17Z[ RECOGNIZING 1999 MINOR DIVISION CHAMPIONS IN THE CHESTERFIELD BOYS BASKETBALL LEAGUE WHEREAS, the Chesterfield Boys Division consists of 35 teams; and Basketball League Minor WHEREAS, these teams provide youths with the opportunity to engage in wholesome recreational programs; and WHEREAS, the competition and camaraderie fostered by the league are positive influences on the young men participating; and WHEREAS, the Harrowgate Eagles, led by Coach Lawrence Mines, completed the regular season with ten wins and no losses; and WHEREAS, the Harrowgate Eagles won the Minor NCAA County championship by defeating the Chalkley Lakers by a score of 35 to 30 at Manchester High School on March 13, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes the superb efforts of the Harrowgate Eagles and Coach Mines, and commends them for their outstanding accomplishments and noteworthy record. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page ~ of Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 15. A. 2. Subject: Resolution Recognizing the 1999 Intermediate Division of Champions in the Chesterfield Boys Basketball League County. Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached Resolution Summary_ of Information: Mr. Daniel requested that the attached Resolution be adopted. In recognition of the superb efforts of the Chalkley Tarheels, and Coach Michael Goode, in w/nning the Intermediate NCAA County championship by defeating the Hening Lakers with a score of 41 to 33 at Midlothian High School on March 13, 1999. Preparer:/"'¢.~..~~~j f-~Don~ J. ~a~p,~ //f[ Attachments: Yes ~ No Title: Director, Public Affairs RECOGNIZING 1999 INTERMEDIATE DIVISION CHAMPIONS IN THE CHESTERFIELD BOYS BASKETBALL LEAGUE WHEREAS, the Chesterfield Boys Basketball League Intermediate Division consists of 28 teams; and WHEREAS, these teams provide youths with the opportunity to engage in wholesome recreational programs; and WHEREAS, the competition and camaraderie fostered by the league are positive influences on the young men participating; and WHEREAS, the Chalkley Tarheels, led by Coach Michael Goode, completed the regular season with nine wins and one loss; and WHEREAS, the Chalkley Tarheels won the Intermediate NCAA County championship by defeating the Hening Lakers by a score of 41 to 33 at Midlothian High School on March 13, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes the superb efforts of the Chalkley Tarheels and Coach Goode, and commends them for their outstanding accomplishments and noteworthy record. Meeting Date: April 28. 1999 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Item Number: 1 $. A. 3. Page ~__ of 1 Sub_iect: Resolution Recognizing the 1999 Junior Division of Champions in the Chesterfield Boys Basketball League County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached Resolution Summary_ of Informatioll; Mr. Daniel requested that the attached Resolution be adopted. In recognition of the superb efforts of the Challdey Knicks, and Coach Michael Bradford, in winning the Junior NCAA County championship by defeating the Evergreen Eagles with a score of 61 to 47 at Meadowbrook High School on March 13, 1999. /~D ~'i~ aid J.~l~apl~el/F~ / Attachments: Yes ~-] No Title: Director, Public Affaks I# 176] RECOGNIZING 1999 JUNIOR DIVISION CHAMPIONS IN THE CHESTERFIELD BOYS BASKETBALL LEAGUE WHEREAS, the Chesterfield Boys Basketball League Junior Division consists of 24 teams; and WHEREAS, these teams provide youths with the opportunity to engage in wholesome recreational programs; and WHEREAS, the competition and camaraderie fostered by the league are positive influences on the young men participating; and WHEREAS, the Chalkley Knicks, led by Coach Michael Bradford, completed the regular season with six wins and four losses; and WHEREAS, the Chalkley Knicks won the Junior NCAA County championship by defeating the Evergreen Eagles by a score of 61 to 47 at Meadowbrook High School on March 13, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes the superb efforts of the Chalkley Knicks and Coach Bradford, and commends them for their outstanding accomplishments and noteworthy record. Meeting Date: ~pril 28, 1999 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Item Number: 15.A.4. Page 1___ of 1___ Subject: Resolution Recognizing the 1999 Senior Division of Champions in the Chesterfield Boys Basketball League County. Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached Resolution Summary_ of Information: Mr. Daniel requested that the attached Resolution be adopted. In recognition of the superb efforts of the Beulah Colts, and Coach Dennis Harding, in winning the Senior NCAA County championship by defeating the Jacobs Jaguars with a score of 83 to 82 at Manchester High School on February 26, 1999. /~~nald J/t~pp;1/-~ ( Attachments: Yes ~ No Title: Director, Public Affairs RECOGNIZING 1999 SENIOR DIVISION CHAMPIONS IN THE CHESTERFIELD BOYS BASKETBALL LEAGUE WHEREAS, the Chesterfield Boys Basketball League Senior Division consists of 33 teams; and WHEREAS, these teams provide youths with the opportunity to engage in wholesome recreational programs; and WHEREAS, the competition and camaraderie fostered by the league are positive influences on the young men participating; and WHEREAS, the Beulah Colts, led by Coach Dennis Harding, completed the regular season with ten wins and no losses; and WHEREAS, the Beulah Colts won the Senior NCAA County championship by defeating the Jacobs Jaguars by a score of 83 to 82 at Manchester High School on February 26, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes the superb efforts of the Beulah Colts and Coach Harding, and commends them for their outstanding accomplishments and noteworthy record. Meeting Date: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA April 28, 1999 Item Number: Page 15.B. 1 o fl Subject: Recognition of Volunteer Rescue Squad Week, May 16 - 22, 1999 Count~ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: BoardAction Requested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Representatives from the rescue squads will be present at the meeting to accept the resolutions. Steve A. Elswick Attachments: Title: Fire Chief Yes ~-~ No 1~0 RECOGNIZING MAY 16-22, 1999 AS "VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD WEEK" WHEREAS, Bensley-Bermuda, Ettrick-Matoaca, Forest View, and Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad members provide basic and advanced pre-hospital patient care, a vital public service, tO the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, access to quality emergency care dramatically improves the survival and recovery rate of those who experience · sudden illness or injury; and WHEREAS, last year volunteer Chesterfield County answered almost responses; and rescue 9,000 squad members in emergency medical WHEREAS, members of the volunteer rescue squads engage in thousands of hours of specialized training and continuing education to enhance their lifesaving skills; and WHEREAS, these services are provided strictly on a volunteer basis without monetary compensation; and WHEREAS, injury prevention and the appropriate use of the EMS system can reduce national health care costs; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County is committed to assisting the squads in their role as an integral part of Emergency Medical Services. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes the week of May 16-22, 1999, as "Volunteer Rescue Squad Week,n and asks the citizens of Chesterfield County to participate in activities sponsored by their local squads to promote safety at home, work, school, and on the roadways and recognize the contributions made by the volunteers. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page ~__ Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 15. C. Sub_iect; Resolution Recognizing Girl Scout Troop 841 County_ Administrator's Comments~ County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached Resolution Mr. Barber requested that the attached Resolution be adopted. In recognition of Girl Scout Troop 841, which has brought positive and national attention Chesterfield County by entering a photograph in the popular "milk mustaches" campaign and being selected as one of three "Creativity Award" wimners from over 30,000 photographs submitted nationally. ~)onald J. I~ppel ' ! w - Attachments: Yes [---] No I I Director, Public Affairs # RECOGNIZING GIRL SCOUT TROOP 841 UPON THEIR RECEIPT OF THE ~CREATIVITY AWARD" AND PHOTOGRAPH IN ~PEOPLE" MAGAZINE WHEREAS, Girl Scout Troop 841 in Midlothian is comprised of girls from Watkins; Betty Weaver and Swift Creek Elementary Schools; and WHEREAS, Troop Leader Wanda Murray suggested that, since Girl Scout cookies and milk are a natural match, a photograph of the Girl Scouts with Girl Scout cookies would be a good advertisement for milk; and WHEREAS, these Junior Girl Scouts entered a photograph with the popular ~milk mustache" theme in a national competition; and WHEREAS, the competition involved a ~Milk Mobile" tour of 100 cities on a ~Better Bones" campaign; and WHEREAS, the photograph of five Troop 841 girls with ~milk mustaches" was selected as one of three ~Creativity Award" winners from more than 30,000 photographs submitted nationally; and WHEREAS, the photograph appeared in the February 22, 1999 issue of ~People" magazine; and WHEREAS, Troop 841 has brought positive, national attention to Chesterfield County. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Troop 841, congratulates them on their success in this national advertising competition, and wishes these Junior Girl Scouts continued success in their scouting careers. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 15.D. Su~ect: Resolution Recognizing Meadowbrook High School as Chesterfield County's International High School County Administrator's Commen~: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached Resolution Summary of Information: Mr. Daniel requested that the attached Resolution be adopted. The resolution recognizes Meadowbrook High School staff and the Interact Club for their role in encouraging students to think globally. Lisa H. Elko Attachments: Yes ~-~ No Title: Acting Clerk to the Board 184 The following criteria justify recognition of Meadowbrook High School as Chesterfield County's International High School: Whereas, Meadowbrook High School is the home of the county's secondary English as a Second Language (ESL) program; Whereas, Meadowbrook is one of two locations in Chesterfield that houses the prestigious International Baccalaureate program; Whereas, the South Richmond Chapter of Rotary International recognizes, sponsors, and supports the Interact Club at Meadowbrook; Whereas, the Interact Club has a continuing program of purchasing, presenting, and hanging flags representing the various nations of students and faculty within the school; Whereas, the South Richmond Rotary and Meadowbrook High School share in a partnership that provides the children of Guyana access to school books; Whereas, Meadowbrook High School students annually participate in various Model United Nations programs held throughout the state of Virginia; Whereas, the Foreign Language Department traditionally celebrates Foreign Language Week with activities to create and enhance student awareness of the different languages and cultures represented at Meadowbrook High School; Whereas, of the 1410 students at Meadowbrook High School, 58 nationalities are represented within the student body, and of 49 athletes on the Meadowbrook soccer and tennis teams, 22 players represent nationalities other than America and speak more than 20 different languages; Therefore, be it resolved that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby recognize Meadowbrook High School as truly an International School. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of ~ Meeting Date: April 28~ 1999 Item Number: 15 .E. Subject: Resolution recognizing Henry Respess for His Service to the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Request the Board of Supervisors pass the attached resolution recognizing Mr. Henry Respess for his service to the Industrial Development Authority of Chesterfield County. Summary of Information: Mr. Henry Respess, from the Bermuda District, served on the Industrial Development Authority from August 25, 1993 to November 1998 at which time he resigned to pursue increasing business interests. It is requested that the Board pass the attached resolution recognizing Mr. Henry Respess for his service to the Industrial Development Authority of Chesterfield County. Agi9a2/erk Preparer: Attachments: ames G. Dunn YesNo ~] Title: Acting Director evelopment RECOGNIZING MR. HENRY RESPESS FOR HIS SERVICE TO THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY WHEREAS, Mr. Henry Respess has served with distinction as a member of the Industrial Development Authority from August 25, 1993 to November, 1998; and WHEREAS, Mr. Respess has faithfully and diligently performed the duties and discharged the responsibilities incumbent upon a member of the Industrial Development Authority; and WHEREAS, Mr. Respess has demonstrated leadership, sensitivity, and commitment to the issues before the Industrial Development Authority while serving on the Board. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Mr. Henry Respess and expresses its appreciation for his commitment and significant contributions to the promotion of industry and development of trade while serving on the Industrial Development Authority. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to Mr. Respess and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: April 28, '1999 Item Number: 15.F. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Laurie Newill for Her Contributions to Development of the Clover Hill District and Her Service on the Brandermill Community Association's Board of Directors County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached Resolution Summary of Information: Mr. Warren requested that the attached Resolution be adopted. The Ras®lutien recognizes Laurie Newill for her service on the Brandermill Cemmunity Ass®ciation's Board of Directors and her contributions to the · ~vele~ment of the Clover Hill District. Preparer: Lisa H. Elko Title: Acting Clerk to the Board Attachments: Yes ~ No # 188 RECOGNIZING LAURIE NEWILL FOR HER CONTRIBUTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT OF THE CLOVER HILL DISTRICT AND HER SERVICE ON THE BRANDERMILL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS WHEREAS, Laurie Newill has served on the Board of Directors for the Brandermill Community Association from April, 1994 until April, 1999 and, during this time, held the office of President and, most recently, First Vice-President; WHEREAS, Laurie was instrumental in developing the long-range strategic plan for Brandermill in order to maintain the superior character of the community; and WHEREAS, Laurie worked with developers in a leadership capacity on such major projects as Faison Capital Development, Incorporated and Home Depot USA, Incorporated. WHEREAS, Laurie has served as Brandermill's spokesperson at numerous County meetings of the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, Laurie has represented Brandermill in promoting environmental interests with respect to the Swift Creek Reservoir including the adoption of the amendments to the Upper Swift Creek Ordinance; promotion of a watershed-wide BMP Master Plan; and incorporation of environmental protection language in the proposed Route 288 Corridor Plan; and WHEREAS, during her service on Brandermill's Board of Directors, Laurie served on numerous committees including the Environmental Committee, Fourth of July Committee, Playground Committee and the Strategic Planning Committee; and has been a longstanding member of the Brandermill Neighborhood Representative Council; and WHEREAS, Laurie represents the epitome of volunteerism and, as such, is worthy of recognition. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Laurie Newill for her years of service to the Brandermill Community Association and her contributions to the development of the Clover Hill District. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to Laurie and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. Meeting Date: April 28. 1999 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Item Number: 15. G. Page __~ of 1 Sub_iect: Resolution Recognizing May 1999 as Asian Pacific American Heritage Month County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached Resolution Summary_ of Information: Mr. Daniel requested that the attached Resolution be adopted. In recognition of Asian/Pacific Americans, for their many accomplishments including becoming mayors, members of Congress, astronauts, and judges. For their achievements in the field of medicine and in the sciences, including a Nobel Prize in Chemistry, and in recognition of nine Asian/Pacific Americans who have earned the Medal of Honor, the nation's highest award for bravery in combat. r~Donald ~aCpel' /~// ~ Attachments: Yes ~-~ No Title: Director, Public Affairs l# RECOGNIZING MAY 1999 AS "ASIAN/PACIFIC AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH" WHEREAS, President Clinton has proclaimed May "Asian/Pacific American Heritage Month"; and 1999 as WHEREAS, Asian/Pacific Americans have brought energy, talent and many noteworthy achievements to their adopted nation; and WHEREAS, by the year 2000 as many as 10 million Americans may be of Asian/Pacific American descent; and WHEREAS, Asian/Pacific Americans have achieved recognition as mayors; members of Congress; astronauts; judges and in many other noteworthy careers; and WHEREAS, nine Asian/Pacific Americans have earned the Medal of Honor, the nation's highest award for bravery in combat; and WHEREAS, Asian/Pacific Americans have excelled in many fields, including receiving a Nobel Prize in Chemistry; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County is fortunate to enjoy the many positive contributions made by Asian/Pacific Americans. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors recognizes May 1999 as ~Asian/Pacific American Heritage Month," and celebrates the many contributions of Asian/Pacific Americans to the strength of our county, our state and our nation. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: 15. H. Subject: Recognizing Robert Bryan McKinley, Jr., Troop 829, and Neal Thomas Burns, Troop 829, both sponsored by Saint Matthias' Episcopal Church Upon Attaining Rank of Eagle Scout County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolutions. Summary of Information: Staff has received requests for the Board to adopt resolutions recognizing Mr. McKinley and Mr. Burns, both from Troop 829 upon attaining rank of Eagle Scout. Ail will be present at the meeting, accompanied by members of their family, to accept the resolutions. Clover Hill District Neal Burns Parents: David & Donna Midlothian District Robert McKinley Parents: Bob & Debbie Lisa H. Elko Attachments: Ycs -~No Title: Acting Clerk to the Board WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote citizenship training, personal development, and fitness of individuals; and WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and WHEREAS, Mr. Robert Bryan McKinley, Jr., Troop 829, sponsored by Saint Matthias' Episcopal Church, has accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by less than two percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding himself on the great accomplishments of his Country, Robert is indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Mr. Robert Bryan McKinley, Jr. and acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an outstanding young man as one of its citizens. WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote citizenship training, personal development, and fitness of individuals; and WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and WHEREAS, Mr. Neal Thomas Burns, Troop 829, sponsored by Saint Matthias' Episcopal Church, has accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by less than two percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding himself on the great accomplishments of his Country, Neal is indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Mr. Neal Thomas Burns and acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an outstanding young man as one of its citizens. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of/4 Meetin~ Date: A~ril 28, 1999 Item Number: 17. A. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider: FY00 through FY05 Secondary Road Six-Year Improvement Plan; FY00 Secondary Road Improvement Budget; and Chesterfield Road Fund and Surface Transportation Program Fund Project Development Schedules County. Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: A public heating to discuss the FY00 through FY05 Secondary Road Six Year Improvement Plan, FY00 Secondary Rea~l Improvement Budget, and Chesterfield Road Fund and Surface Transportation Program Fund Project ~evelel~mcnt Sche~lules. Summary of Information: FY00 through FY05 Secondary. Road Six Year Improvement Plan State statutes enable the Board of Supervisors to prepare and adopt, jointly with the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), a Six Year Plan identifying improvements that are anticipated to be made to the Secondary Road System in the County. The proposed Six Year Plan includes the same projects approved by the Board in October 1997 with the inclusion of three new projects: Old Bon Air Road Safety Project, Old Buckingham Road Project, and Kingsland Road/Reedy Creek Project. (Continued next page) Preparer: ~. 3. ~../~~/~ Title: R.J. McCracken Agen 383 Attachments: Yes ~ No Director of Transportation CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 4 Summary of information: (Continued) The Plan has been developed based on an average $11.3 million per year allocation ($8.9 million Secondary Road allocation, $1.4 million anticipated Richmond Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds, and $1.0 million Chesterfield Road Fund (VDOT/County matching program). The $11.3 million per year allocation represents a $300,000 increase in the annual allocation as compared to the current Six Year Plan. Details of the Six Year Plan are shown on Attachments A through H. FYO0 Secondary Road Improvement Budget Each year VDOT requests the Board of Supervisors to approve a Secondary Road Improvement Budget. The budget reflects the initial year of the Six Year Plan and identifies specific project allocations for the fiscal year. Attachments I and J identify the projects and allocations for FY00. Chesterfield Road Fund Project Development Schedule The County regularly participates in an annual VDOT matching fund program (Chesterfield Road Fund) wherein the County provides $500,000 to be matched on a dollar-for-dollar basis by VDOT. The exact amount of funds provided by VDOT is determined by VDOT after all statewide requests for matching funds have been received. Staffwill adjust the specific project allocations once VDOT makes its determination. Projects for the program are selected on a rotational basis among the magisterial districts. The Board last approved the Chesterfield Road Fund Schedule in October 1997. The recommended schedule (Attachment G) is a continuation of the currently approved Project Development Schedule with the addition of Matoaca and Dale Districts receiving allocations in FY05. Surface Transportation Program (STP) Fund Pr0j ect Development Schedule The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is given the authority to specify projects to be funded from "Regional STP Funds." The Richmond MPO receives approximately $10.2 million each year in STP Funds. Chesterfield anticipates receiving approximately $1.4 million annually of Regional STP Funds. The Board last approved the STP Fund Schedule in October 1997. Attachment H identifies the recommended Surface Transportation Program Fund Project Development Schedule. (Continued next page) 196 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 4 Recommendation: Staff`recommends the Board: 1. Adopt the attached resolutions approving the FY00 through FY05 Secondary Road Six Year Improvement Plan and FY00 Secondary Road Improvement Budget; 2. Approve the FY00 through FY05 Chesterfield Road Fund Project Development Schedule, and the FY00 through FY05 Surface Transportation Program Fund Project Development Schedule; and Authorize the County Administrator to enter into VDOT/County/consultant/contractor, design, right-of-way acquisition, and/or construction agreements, acceptable to the County Attorney, for the projects. District: Countywide CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 4 of 4 Meetino Date: April 28. 1999 Number Bud.qet and Manaqement Comments: This item requests the Board of Supervisors to hold a public hearing to consider the FY2000-2005 six year road plan which identifies improvements anticipated to be made to the secondary road system in the County. The plan has been developed assuming an allocation of $11~3 ~;i!!ion, which inc!~des a $1.0 million Che~terfie!~ Ro~ Fund Program. Under this prr~gra]~ the County provides $500,000 to be ~auched on a dollar-for-dollar basis by VDOT. The FY2000-2004 Proposed Capital Improvement Program includes $500,000 per year for this program. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budget & Mana,qement WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) have conducted a public hearing on the FY00 through FY05 Secondary Road Six Year Improvement Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board concurs with the proposed projects identified in the Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors approves the Six Year Secondary Road Improvement Plan as presented by VDOT. April 28, 1999 WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has submitted its proposed FY00 Secondary Road Improvement Budget to the County; and WHEREAS, the Budget represents the implementation of the first year of the Six Year Improvement Plan adopted by the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors approves the FY00 Secondary Road Improvement Budget as presented by VDOT. April 28, 1999 ZOO INDEX OF ATTACHMENTS FY00 THROUGH 05 SECONDARY ROAD SIX YEAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN Attachment A - Annual Revenue Projections Attachment B - Countywide Incidental ("Rout/ne") Items Attachment C - Location Map of Projects Attachment D - Projects by Magisterial District Attachment E - Anticipated Project Construction Dates Attachment F - Specific Yearly Allocations Attachment G - Recommended Chesterfield Road Fund Project Development Schedule Attachment H - Recommended Surface Transportation Program (STP) Fund Project Development Schedule FY00 SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENT BUDGET Attachment I - Location Map of Projects Attachment J - Specific Project Allocations ;501 SECONDARY ROAD SIX YEAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY00-FY05 REVENUE PROJECTIONS FUNDING SOURCE FISCAL ALLOCATION SECONDARY ROAD $8.9 MILLION REGIONAL (STP) SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM $1.4 MILLION COUNTY ROAD FUND $1.0 MILLION TOTAL: $11.3 MILLION ATTACHMENT A COUNTY-WIDE INCIDENTAL ITEMS RURAL ADDITION TRAFFIC SERVICES PIPE INSTALLATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING $130,000 26,000 86,000 50,000 TOTAL: $292,000 ATTACHMENT B NORTH PROPOSED SECONDARY ROAD SIX YEAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY O0 THROUGH FY 05 1,0 0.4 OLD BON AIR RD BUFORD RD/ROCKAWAY RD s~-o~ SU-O3 3.7 OLD BUCKINGHAM RD Beyond ROBIOUS RD 1,8 SMOKETREE DR/ 0,5 F-99 GORDON SCHOOL 8,0 Beyond OLD HUNDRED RD 13.2 F-Od GENITO RD 0.4 SU-99 OLD HUNDRED RD 0,7 Beyond WOOLRIDGE 1,9 F-01 BAILEY BRIDGE RD ~._ 'x 1.5 COA[~ORO'-RD Sp-O0 1.4 F-O1 0.3 sp-o4 RIVERWAY RD 0,3 su-o4 HENSLEY QUALLA RD 1,8 su-oo NEWBYS BRIDGE RD o.] WILD TURKEY RUN SP-O0 ?.O Sp-O4 NASH RD 1.5 Beyond RHODES LA ~ PROJECT WITHIN 6 YEAR PLAN · · · PROJECT BEYOND 6 YEAR PLAN 1,1 FOREST HILL AVE/BUFORD RD sP-oo 5,6 8( 9.0 COURTHOUSE RD uc REAMS RD 0.4 F-04 WALMSLEY BLVD 0.9 NEWBYS BRIDGE RD 3,7 5.1 F-02 F-03 1,0 KINGSLAND RD Beyond DUNDAS RD ~.o su-oo BEULAH RD 2.7 Beyond 2,7 SALEM CHURCH RD sp-o2 HOPKINS RD 2,8 U,C, / I / ~-~ / CENTRE ST sP-oo 0,2 MAROBRITH RD 0.] LINDBERG DR $U-99 0.5 LAKEVIEW RD sp-04 LAKEVIEW RD 0.3 ~ -~ Sp-02 3,9 BRANDERS BRIDGE RD sp-o4 LEGEND cost in Csfmillions of $ ( ) Multi Jurisdictional ruction Year W - Winter Sp - Spring Su - Summer F - Fall UC- UNDER C0NSTRUCTION J ATTACHMENT C J ;~04 PROPOSED SECONDARY ROAD SIX YEAR PROJECTS FY 00 THROUGH FY 05 BY MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT DISTRICT/ PROJECT FROM TO DESCRIPTION ANTICIPATED START CONSTRUCTION BERMUDA LINDBERG DR HARROWGATE RD DEAD END PAVE GRAVEL RD CENTRE ST RTE !0 0.1 MI. N. RTE 10 NEW2 LANE DUNDAS RD STRATHMORE RD INTERSECTION TURN LANES MAROBRITH RD HAPPY HILL RD DEAD END PAVE GRAVEL RD BRANDERS BRIDGE RD RTE 10 HAPPY HILL RD WIDEN 2 LANE CLOVER HILL ~ COURTHOUSE RD EDENBERRY DR LUCKS LA WIDEN 4&6 LANE ~ COURTHOUSE RD GENITO RD RTE 360 WIDEN 4 LANE GENITO RD WARBRO RD INTERSECTION DRAINAGE PIPE OLD HUNDRED RD MILLRIDGE PKY E BOUNDARY RD SHOULDERS WALMSLEY SLVD HOLRIDGE ST INTERSECTION TURN LANES WALMSLEY BLYD NEWBY'S BRIDGE INTERSECTION TURN LANES SMOKETREE DR GORDON SCHOOL RD YARROW LA SIDEWALK/BIKE LA GORDON SCHOOL RD SPIREA RD SMOKETREE DR SIDEWALK GENITO RD RTE $60 SOUTH RIDGE DR WIDEN 4 LANE GENITO RD SOUTH RIDGE DR FOX CHASE LA WIDEN 4 LANE NEWBYS BRIDGE RD WALMSLEY BLVD FALLING CREEK BR WIDEN 2 LANE ** REAMS RD ADKINS RD INTERSECTION TURN LANES DALE WALMSLEY BLVD TURNER RD INTERSECTION TURN LANES COURTHOUSE RD GENITO RD RTE 360 WIDEN 4 LANE COURTHOUSE RD RTE 288 GENITO RD WIDEN 4 LANE HOPKINS RD INCA DR LAUREL OAK RD WIDEN 2 LANE LORI ROAD RELOCATED RTE t0 JURY DR NEW 2 LANE SALEM CHURCH RD KINGSLAND RD BEULAH RD WIDEN 2 LANE SALEM CHURCH RD CENTRALIA RD INTERSECTION TURN LANE NEWBYS BRIDGE RD FALLING CREEK HAGOOD LA WIDEN 2 LANE SALEM CHURCH RD HUNTINGCREEK DR INTERSECTION TURN LANES KINGSLAND RD REEDY CREEK DRAINAGE IMPR BEULAH RD SALEM CHURCH RD HOPKINS RD WIDEN 2 LANE MATOACA COURTHOUSE RD RTE 268 GENITO RD WIDEN 4 LANE GENITO RD COURTHOUSE RD RTE 360 WIDEN 4 LANE NASH RD BEACH RD MORRISETT RD NEW 2 LANE COALBORO RD 0.6MI. S. WlNTERPOCK RIVER RD PAVE GRAVEL RD WILD TURKEY RUN SADDLEBROOi( RD DEAD END PAVE GRAVEL RD NEWBYS BRIDGE RD QUALLA RD 0.5 MI. E. QUALLA RD WIDEN 2 LANE SPRING RUN RD MCENNALLY RD BAILEY BRIDGE RD CURVES BAILEY BRIDGE RD CLAYPOINT RD MANCHESTER H.S. WIDEN 2 LANE LAKEVIEW RD WOODPECKER RD INTERSECTION TURN LANES LAKEVIEW RD BRANDERS BRIDGE RD INTERSECTION TURN LANE RIVERWAY RD BEACH RD INTERSECTION REALIGNMENT NASH RD MORRISETT RD HIGHLAND GLEN DR WIDEN 2 LANE HENSLEY RD SPRING RUN RD INTERSECTION REALIGNMENT BAILEY BRIDGE RD MANCHESTER H.S. SPRING RUN RD WIDEN 2 LANE RHODES LANE 0.6MI S WOODPECKER 0.SMI W SANDYFORD PAVE GRAVEL RD QUALLA RD COURTHOUSE RD RTE 288 WIDEN 2 LANE QUALLA RD CLAYPOINT RD SPRING RUN RD WIDEN 2 LANE OLD HUNDRED RD OTTERDALE RD DRY BRIDGE RD WIDEN 2 LANE QUALLA RD SPRING RUN RD BEACH RD WIDEN 2 LANE WOOLRI!DGE RD TIMBER BLUFF PKY RESERVOIR WIDEN 2 LANE MfDLOTHIAN COURTHOUSE RD RTE 60 EDENBERRY DR WIDEN 6 LANE ** COURTHOUSE RD EDENBERRY DR LUCKS LA WIDEN 4&6 LANE ROBIOUS RD HUGUENOT RD SALISBURY RD WIDEN 4 LANE ROBIOUS RD RTE 60 WOODMONT DR WIDEN 4 LANE FOREST HILL AVE BUFORD RD INTERSECTION SIDEWALK FOREST HILL AVE BUFORD RD INTERSECTION STREET LIGHT * OLD BON AIR ROAD IRON MILL RD WATERS MILL RD WIDEN 2 LANE ~ REAMS RD ADKINS RD INTERSECTION TURN LANES ROBIOUS RD JAMES RIVER RD COUNTY LINE WIDEN 2 LANE BUFORD RD ROCKAWAY RD INTERSECTION TURN LANES * OLD BUCKINGHAM RD RTE 60 ALVERSER DR WIDEN 2 LANE NEW PROJECT PROJECT IN MORE THAN ONE DISTRICT magdist2 3-24-99 SUMMER 1999 SPRING 2000 SUMMER 2OOO FALL 2003 SPRING 2004 UNDER CONSTRUCTION UNDER CONSTRUCTION UNDER CONSTRUCTION SUMMER 1999 SUMMER 1999 SUMMER 1999 FALL 1999 FALL 1999 FALL 1999 FALL 2OOO FALL 2002 FALL 2OO4 COMPLETE UNDER CONSTRUCTION UNDER CONSTRUCTION UNDER CONSTRUCTION SUMMER 1999 SPRING 2002 FALL 2OO2 FALL 2OO3 FALL 2005 SPRING 2OO8 SPRING 2OO8 UNDER CONSTRUCTION UNDER CONSTRUCTION SPRING 1999 SPRING 2OOO SPRING 2OOO SUMMER 2000 FALL 2001 FALL 200t SPRING 2002 SPRING 2004 SPRING 2004 SPRING 2004 FALL 2004 SUMMER 2OO5 SPRING 2006 SPRING 2006 SUMMER 2006 SPRING 2008 FALL 2009 SPRING 2010 COMPLETE UNDER CONSTRUCTION SPRING 200O SPRING 2O0O SPRING 2OOO SPRING 2000 SUMMER 2OO3 FALl_ 2004 SPRING 2005 SPRING 2005 SUMMER 2007 I ATTACHMENT D I ;_'.05 PROPOSED SECONDARY ROAD CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE FY 00 THROUGH FY 05 PROJECT/ LOCATION COURTHOUSE ROAD EDENBERRY DRTO LUCK8 LA HOPKINS ROAD INCA DR TO LAUREL OAK RD COURTHOUSE ROAD RT 28~ TO GENITO RD COURTHOUSE ROAD QENITO RD TO RT 36O GENITO ROAD COURTHOUSE TO RT 3M GENITO ROAD WARBRO INTERSECTION (DRAiNAge[_ NASH ROAD BEACH RD TO MORRJSETT RD LINDBERG DR HARROWGATE RD TO DEAO END LORI ROAD RELOCATED RT 10/LORJ ROAD INTERSECTION WALMSLEY BLVD SMOKETREE DR/GORDON SCHOOL RD FOREST HILL AVE/ DUNDAS ROAD HENSLEY ROAD RHODES LANE ANTICIPATED YEAR CONSTRUCTION WILL START lggg 2000 200t 2002 2003 20~4 2OO5 ~ISTRUCTION ~STRUCTI N __ ATTACHMENT BEYOND PLAN ;?.06 rrOrc> m ~ ~ ~m o ~ o: ~ o m~ ~ m o o ~ - mmz~ m~O ITl m 0 0 Z Z I ATTACHMENT Ft ~ ~ 0 zm z ~ ~~ m IATTACHMENT G I 0 m 'om mc 'rzo mO OZ c.13 m~ 0 z IATTACHMENT HI PROPOSED FY 00 SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENT BUDGET NORTH GENITO RD COALBORO RD RUN RD ROBIOU$ RD DUNDAS RD LORI RD NEWB~SBRIDGE RD NASH RD LAKEVIEW RD OOSEBUD FEB 4, 99 ATTACHMENT I ;.,:LO PROPOSED FY00 SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENT BUDGET ROAD FROM TO DESCRIPTION ALLOCATION COUNTY WIDE ITEMS OLD HUNDRED RD SPRING RUN RD DUNDAS RD NASH RD ROBIOUS RD ROBIOUS RD BAILEY BRIDGE RD LAKEVIEW RD COALBORO RD GENITO RD GENITO RD NEWBYS BRIDGE RD LORI ROAD RELOC VARIOUS LOCATIONS MILLRIDGE PKY MCENNALLY RD STRATHMORE RD BEACH RD HUGUENOT RD RTE 60 CLAYPOINT RD WOODPECKER RD 0.6MI. S. WINTERPOCK RTE 360 SOUTH RIDGE DR QUALLA RD RTE 10 E. BOUNDARY RD BAILEY BRIDGE RD INTERSECTION MORRISETT RD SALISBURY RD WOODMONT DR MANCHESTER H.S. INTERSECTION RIVER RD SOUTH RIDGE DR FOX CHASE LA 0.5 MI. E. QUALLA RD JURY DR MISC $292,000 SHOULDERS $68,918 CURVES $83,000 TURN LANES $27,200 NEW 2 LANE $309,357 WIDEN 4 LANE $549,853 WIDEN 4 LANE $970,000 WIDEN 2 LANE $150,000 TURN LANES $60,000 PAVE GRAVEL RD $465,000 WIDEN 4 LANE $2,083,492 WIDEN 4 LANE $3,389,511 WIDEN 2 LANE $318,000 NEW 2 LANE $90,000 TOTAL $8,856,331 FYOOBUDR 3-24-99 ATTACHMENT J Wednesday, ,~pril 2% 1999 A15 ' ! ~e Chesm'~eld Dep~enro~T~fion will on W~e~y, April 28, 1999 Second~ ~ Come.on ~e ~od '1~9-2000 ~ou~ ~.~999~2~ i ~e bUbli~"~g will ~ held ~uitd~g '~'R0uie' I 0' ~d' ~' Rond. Intere~ present commen~ reg~ding ~e"~ate ~d ~ available ~t' the VDOT Chest~eld Reside~' 3301 S~eks D~ve Off Rou~e 3~0. If you ~qulre info~tiOn or special msi~t~ce to a~end ~is Cnll 804-6?4-2800. ~ us~n may call !-800-307~630.' Clinton seen as accepting judge's order e.% Los ANGELES TIMES/ ~W^SmNC. TON POST NEWS SERVmE ~nsmnaxon -- President Clinton does not plan to challenge a federal judge's order finding him in con- tempt of court for giving false testi- mony about his sexual relationship With Monica Lewsinky, according to sources familiar with advice given by Clinton's attorneys and adv/sers. The contempt order issued Mon- day by U.S. District Court Judge Su- san Webber' Wright of Arkansas strongly condemns Clinton's effbrts to hide his affair with Lewinsky from lawyers pressing the Paula Jones sexual harassment lawsuit, but it carries relatively light penalties. Bar referral Several Clinton advisers are rec- ommending that he accept Wright's sanctions -- which call for compen- sating her and Jones' lawyers for some expenses, and refers Clinton's. conduct to Arkansas judicial authori- ties for a ruling on 'his fitness to practice law ~ as an acceptable price for bringing closure to a legal co[ttroversy that has haunted his -l~sidency since 1994. ~Although the prevailing assump- ,-~..' among Clinton's legal and politi- ' 'e~Padvisers is that he should not ap- .1~_, he has not been presented a fi- n~. recommendation, sources said. Clinton's attorneys are still review- ing the judge's order, studying in particular whether accepting Wright's sanctions now might some- how expose Clinton to increased le- gal jeopardy if independent counsel Kenneth Start chooses to pursue a criminal perjury case against the · president down the road. Could change their minds Clinton's lawyers said they could also change their minds and decide to challenge the order if Wright ends up assigning a prohibitively high fig- ute that Clinton would be required to reimburse Jones' legal team. Nonetheless, the most likely op- tion, according to White House sources, is that the White House will announce within several days that, while it does not agree with Wright's conclusion that Clinton lied under oath, it has no plans to appeal. Public Notre The Chesterfield County Board of Super~isors"and the Virginia Department of Transportation will joint[)/hold a public hearing on Wednesday, April 28, 1999at 7 p.m. io update the Six Year Secondary Road Constm.cfion Plan for Chestcffield. County for the period 1999-2000 through 2004-2005' and to approve the 1999-2000 Fiscal Year Budget for secondary road construction. The public hearing will be held in the Board Of Supervisors' meeting room at the Chesterfield. count: main administration building at Route l0 andLori Road. ~tereste~ citizens may present comments regarding the uPdate and the budget. Both are available at the VDOT Clie~terfield Residency, located at 3301 Spe'eks Drive off Route 360. If you require gddifional information or special assistance to attend this meeting, please call 804-674-2800. TrY. users may call 1-800-3074630. I ...... EveryBloomin'Time~ 321-2200 I ~L,l t~1~1~! ~1~ tWenty'f°urh°ursaday . Prepare for Network Certification lncreasJn~j, corporations am depending on certification credentials to demonstrate skill pmfldency. Strayer Unive~Jty offers the courses which will help you prepare for certification. ' S~ flexible course'schedules and 12 campus lOcations make it easier than ewr to add ~aluable · credentials to your re~um& You can earn college credit which may be applied toward an . underrJmduate degree. Use state-of-the-art equipment in h{gh tech , ~omputer lab.s. ,:...:. ~., :.:.. MCSE '-CNA ' CNE C~II today to prepare for a career in networking. Henrico Campus 1-888-4-STRAYER ~ www. strayer, edu MARYLAND AnneArundel Montgomery Prince George's STRAYER U, NIV [ VIRGINIA Alexandria Arlington Fredericksburg Henrico Loudoun Ma~ COLONIAL HEIGHTS DUNLOP VILLAGE 526-9300 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 CltESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Item Number: 17.13. Subject: Public Hearing to Change Effective Date of Subdivision Ordinance Amendment Regarding New Road Stripping Rules. County_ Administrator's Commentn: ~)~.__~o-~~J o~ox~-~ County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Planning Commission recommends the Board of Supervisors change the effective date of the attached Subdivision Ordinance Amendment to July 1, 1999. Summary_ of Information: The Board of Supervisors adopted new design standards for "road strip" lots on November 12, 1998. Prior to adoption of the new standards, some property owners had already surveyed and divided their properties consistent with the old design standards, but sold and recorded the lots after the effective date of the new standards. The individuals that purchased these lots are now unable to build homes on the lots because the lots do not meet the new standards. The attached map is enclosed as an example. The owners of Lots 13 and 14 cannot meet the adopted standards while adjacent lots 10, 11, and 12 meet the adopted standards. One solution is to readopt the new standards, changing the effective date to April 29, 1999. This option would allow purchasers of property subdivided before adoption of the new standards to gain approval of their building permits. The Board of Supervisors referred this issue to the Planning Commission for its review. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this issue on April 20, and recommends readopting the new standards with an effective date of July 1, 1999. Setting the effective date for July 1 provides a grace period for purchasers of property subdivided before adoption of the new standards to record those parcels. The Supervis~pproved~an ~~will be added to the ordinance. Preparer:"~~ __ Title: Director of Planning Thomas E. 0_~son Attachments: · Yes [] No attached ordinance amendment does not contain an effective date. Once the Board of Barney Tract Prepared by Chesterfield Planning March 8, 1999 Dpt 5OO 0 5OO 1000 Feet 12/15/98 ·. ~ 12/18/98 ",, ..---" Shaded trac~-. - .......... .~--" do not rree[ adopted Noven'J:~ 12, 1998 ~_ ',, .. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD. 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 17-2 RELATING TO THE DEFINITIONS OF FRONTAGE AND SUBDIVISION BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 17-2 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and reenacted to read as follows: Sec. 17-2 Definitions. In the construction of this chapter, the definitions contained in this section shall be observed and applied, except when the context clearly indicates otherwise: 000 Frontage: The continuous length of the property line of any lot, lots, parcel or tract of land measured along a single public street, road or highway against which the land abuts. O00 Subdivision: The division of any parcel of land for residential use, into two or more lots any one of which is less than five acres, or which has road frontage on which its access is located of less than 300 feet or 250 feet if an sqvared access shared by no more than two lots or parcels is used, o_xr which does not maintain a minimum width of 300 feet, or 250 feet if an access shared by no more than two lots or parcels is used, for a depth of 1000 feet or that necessary to create a 5 acre parcel, for the purpose, either immediate or future, of transfer of ownership or development for residential use including condominium development. ~':-~., w~,,,,,-:-: .... ~,,~'-,,.,u-- j ~-,,,,- "-L.~- purpose of _C~ranting or extinguishing .... : ..... :-' ~.~L,,.$u,=,,,,,.,,[ oF easements, and divisions of land not directed at the creation of lots or parcels for sale resulting from augmented estates, creditor/mechanics' lien suits, condemnations, assignments, involuntary partitions, judicial sales, ~ ................... _ UAJWUI UI ~,LllgUby II,IlLS, ~,o,,, ~.,,~,,.a ~,o,,, u.,,~,,u,, ,,, ~.,;, ~,.; ,,.;~,.,~ .,. lien priorities~ ~, plats of confirmation and open space requirements, ,~,.,~. ~,,~.;, ~ .. iiiterest iii ~a,,u not v, cauun ut ,u[~ Or pa, ~. roi-~1~,--1- shall not be considered ~ an act of subdivision, as long as such division is not done for the purpose of circumventing this chapter. The term "subdivision" shall not include a single division of land into parcels where such division is for the purpose of a sale or gift to a member of the immediate family of the property owner including a partition of property owned by immediate family members. Only one such division shall be allowed per family member and shall not be for the purpose of circumventing this chapter. 1014:23210.1 1 For the purpose of this subsection, a member of the immediate family shall be defined as any person who is a natural or legally defined offspring, spouse, sibling, grandchild, grandparent or parent of the owner. With respect to family subdivision all applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance shall be met and the proposed tot parcel shall conform to the design standards set forth in this chapter. (2) That this ordinance shall not become effective until 1014:23210.1 2 ' P.O. Box 85333 An Affiliate of Media General Richmond, Virginia 23293-0001 (804) 649-6000 Advertisin9 Affidavit (This is not a bill p~ease pay ~:rom invoice) CHESTERFIELD CO, BO, SUPV ATTN FAITH DAVIS BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P O BOX 40 CHESTERFIELD VA 23832 220806 0 /2 /99 04/21/99 121 TAKE NOTICE TAKE NOTICE THAT THE BOARD O 1 x 28 258.16 Richmond Newspapers, lnc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH This is to certify that the attached MEETINGS - COMING EVENTS ! was published bY Richmond Newspapers, Inc., in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia, on the following dates: 04/14/99 04/21/99 The first insertion being given .... Sworn to and subscribed before me this My CommiSsiOn expires 03/31/01 04/1~/99 ~~ /t't~ Supervisor THIS IS NOT A BILL, PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 1 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: Subject: Public Hearing for the Appropriation of Funds for the Centre Street Project County. Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to hold a public hearing to consider appropriation of $610,000 in anticipated Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) reimbursements for the Centre Street project. Summary. of Information: A public hearing is scheduled to consider the appropriation of $610,000 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements for the construction of the Centre Street project. In October 1997, the Board authorized the County Administrator to execute an agreement with VDOT for the design and right-of-way acquisition for the Centre Street project. VDOT has now asked the County to assume responsibility for the administration of the construction of the project. If the County assumes the construction responsibility, a VDOT/County design/right-of-way/construction agreement, similar to those the County has executed in the past, will be necessary. Under the terms of the agreement, the County will perform the various activities and be reimbursed by VDOT. Staff anticipates that VDOT will request modifications during the construction phase of this project which will increase the overall cost of the construction contract. The County's contract with VDOT will permit the County staff to authorize these construction modifications. Additional reimbursement from VDOT to pay for any additional construction work will need to be appropriated by the Board. Staff will bring any such additional appropriation requests back to the Board for its approval. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board appropriate $610,000 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements for the construction of the Centre Street project. Preparer: Title: R.J. McCracken Agen391 Director of Transportation An Affiliate of Media UOUNT r OF CHE~TERF IELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ATTN~ LISA ELKO ELD VA P.O. BOX 85333 RICHMOND VIRGINIA 23293-0001 (804) 649-6000 23832 AMOUNT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: April 28, 1999 Item Number: ;[9. Subject: Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board of Supervisors County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Motion of adjournment and notice of next scheduled meeting on May 25, 1999 at 4:00 p.m. Preparer: Lisa H. Elko Title: Acting Clerk to the Board Attachments: [--~ Yes No