Loading...
10-27-1982 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERV%~ORS MINUTES October 27, 1922 Mrs. Joan Girone~ Chair,.an Mr. Harry G. Daniel, vice Chairman Mr. R. ~arland Dodd ~. Richard L. H~drick County Adminis%ra%o~ Mr. Stanley Be]de,son, Dir_ of Planning Chief Robert Eanes, Fire Department Mr. Elmer Hodge, Asst. County Administrator Mr. Robert Masden, Dir. Dir. of Utilities Krs. Girone called the m~ting tu order at ~he Courthouse at 10:00 a.m. Mr. Dodd gave the invocation. Mrs. Girone w~leomed an~ introduced Mr. Chip Dicks, c~n~ida%e for the ~ouse of Delega~e$~ who was present at the meeting. On motion c~ ~rs. Girone, seconded by ~. Daniel, th~ Board approved the minutes of October 13~ Vote; Unanimous Mr. ~odge introduced Mr. Ja~es I~ "Buddy" Pittman, r~centl¥ hired Risk Manager for the County. ~e stated that ~r. Pittman had receive~ a B.S. in Industrial Manaqement from Auburn University, he had over nineteen years in oor~rciel casualty and property ~nsurance experience in Virginia and other southeastern ~tates, and he is an in~%ructor at the University of Richmond for the Risk Management Program. The Board welcomed Mr. Pittman as a member of the staff ~n~ Mr. ~i~tman stated he looked forward to wurking with ~he County. On motion of Mr. Dodd~ ~econded by Mr. Daniel~ the BOard appointed ~rs. Joan Girone am Chairman of th~ Board until tko first organizational ~ee~ing in Janaary, 1983, which fulfills unexpire~ term of Mr. O'Neill. Vote: Unanimous Mrs. Girene expressed her appreciation to the Board for their vot~ of confidence. on motion of ~r. Dodd, ~esond~ by Mrs. Girons, the Board appointed Mr. ~arry G. Daniel as Vice-Chairman of the ~oard until 82-424 the first organizational meeting in January, 1983, Which fulfills the une×~ire~ term of ~4rs. Girone. V~te: Unanimou~ Mr. Musz? informed the Board that the Animal Control Facility was Occupied on September 24, 1982 and the Vehicle ~aintenance Faoility will be Occupied on November 1, 1985 and invited the Boar~ to visit both. }~r. Bookman stated he had visited the Animal Control Facility and i~ is well designed. He stated that the day he visited the-facility it was practlcal~¥ ?ull. It was noted that %h~ old facility had ~eoeived negativ~ ~oy~mentg from the SPCA. ~r, ~uzzy stated the maintenance faoi~±ty ~ould consolidate the gene=al County 8nd the Fire Department vehicles and improve working condition~. He presented the Board with a fact sheet on both facilities. Mr. Biohard Normally introduced 19 County residents ~ho had participmte~ in the Master Gardeners Program with the Extension 0ffieo. He stated that thi~ progra~ of training people and then having them donate time training others was very ~ucces=ful. state~ that they had to%ally ~enated 1,2QO hours to the County, made approximately 4,~0~ contacts which a~ounts 2o approzimately $10,000 since ~arch. Mrs. CirQue stated thm= the President of the Unite~ S~a~es ha~ encouraged th~ us~ of volunteers and this is a ~ood exam~Ie. Mr. Normally stated that ther~ are already 16 applicants for next year. The fellowin~ participants in the program received certificates: Mrs. Jerry Williams Mr, Gene Settler MS. Leran l,lcGlynn Ms. Barbara ~c~arland Mr. Wilbert Marder~ Me. Barbara DiLalla Mr. ~loyd LOve Ms. ~etty ~taples ~$. Elaine Luikhim Mr. Lorraine Fells Mr. Ellis KuTkendall Mr_ ~ton Nissan ~s, Chi Chi Huff ~s. M~rilvn Babcock Ms. Treys Be~geron Ms. Billy Mo!nar The Board ccngrat~Iated tho~e receiving uer~ificatee. 5~r. ~edrlck relter~ted the need for volunteers an~ co--ended Mr. NunnalIy for hie SuCcessful programs in the County. Board with a fact sheet outlining energy conservatism measures replacing two deteriorated boilar~ in th~ old Courthouse that were in excese of 25 yemrs old; convert,ns six oil burning furnaces to more efficient natural gar which would be used as a primary fuel with oil as a secondary; ooverlng east and southwest exposure windows in the three stery~ two story and one story courts buildin~ with ~ reflec~orized ~oler film to reduce heat build up and air conditioning toad~ insulated ceilings in three story adr~inistrative building and UtilitieSobuflding; reduced all domestic hot water temperature to 125 ; as well es total, have reduced the co~t per square footage from $1.3I to ~1.I3 and hopefully other m~asures will reduce the cost to less than $1.00 per square foot in the future even ~hough increases from Vepco are anticlpate~ to be fairlv high this year. Girone inquired what the schools were ~eing in this reqard. Boykin ~tated they are aisc looking into cost ~avin~ measures. Mr. Eedric~ stated that the County does have th~ image of being the leading jurisdiction in the Commonwealth on energy Mrs. Girune introduced a re~olution reqarding Mallow~n officially observed on Saturday rather than Sunday. Mr. Bookm~n stated he had received phone calls from two SUbdivisions' representatives regarding the observance, requeeting that it remain Sunday. Mr. Daniel stated ~h~ City of Richmond had !officially c~ange the date and that traditionally it had been changed when fallinq on a Sunday. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dodd, it is resolved that the Chesterfield County Doard of Supervisor~ heresy d~clares th~ ~ha sfficial observance of Halloween shall be on Saturday, Qctobe~ 30, !982; however, the ~B~ard hereby invites end enCOurages all County parents to participate with their children in ths 5th Annual Halloween Happening cn Friday, October 29, 19~ a~ ~he Chesterfield County Stadium between the hours of ~:30 D-m. and ICe00 p.m. ~ is felt tha~ participation in this supervised Happening w~ll provide msr~ enjoyable and saf~ activities such as heyrides, games, eoe~ume conte~ts~ refreshments, ~tc. than door-to-door trick-or-treatinq. AyeS: Mrs. Girone, Mr. ~aniel and Mr. DodO. Nays; Mr_ ~ookman because he felt he ehould honor the request ~f the tee representatlves of the subdivisions who had called. Mr. Hedriek stated additional information regarding th~ Halloween Happenlnq could be obtained by contacting tbs Parks and Recreation Department et 748-1623. Mr. Hedrick stated thi¢ date and time had been scheduled for a ~ublic hearing to c~nsider mn ordinance relatinq to participation by juveniles in activities of volunteer fire companies. Chief Eanas introduced Chief Elliott who was or,sent representing the Volunteer Fire' Chicle who wore !00% in ~avor of this ordinance. Mr. Ward was pre,eat and ~tat~d that hs was in favor of 17 or ~ear olds being involved in the fire department but only if they ~ere State trained and certified. Mr_ Do~d stated the proposed Ordinance r~strict$ their activities, and it is basically training and orientation. Mr. Daniel ~tated he had some queetions regarding %hie matter, but they have been reuolved and he feel~ Sunneling the young people's enerqy into a cause worthwhile is positive. There was no one ~lse present to address the matter. On motion of Mr. Daniel, secended by ~r. Dodd, the following ordinanc~ was adopted: An Ordinance to ~-~end =he Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1975, as A~ended, By Adding Section 9-1 Relating to P±~ticipation by Juveniles in Activities of Volunteer Companies Be It Ordained by the ~ard of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That the Code of the County o~ Chesterfield is amended by adding the £cllowing Sec. 9.t. Participation hy Jnveniles in Activities of Volunteer Any psrson sixteen y~ar$ of age or older, with written parental or guardian approval may work with and participate in the activities of any volunteer fire company within the County provided such person has afitaine6 certification under National !Fire Protection Association 1001, level one, fire fichter standards, as administered by the Department of ~ire"~rog~ams and May not drive £ire apparatus; b. May not work inside of or on a burning building until the fire has been declared under control by ~he officer in charge; and o. May not respond outside of Chesterfield CoUnty on mutual aid calls_ Mr. Daniel stated that he understood the spirit in which the ne×t item wax tQ be presented but ~tated he would not partisipate in the decicien as it involves aofiivities of s competitor of his regular employer, Upon asking the County Attorney could he remain in the room, Mr. Daniel did On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Kr. Bookman, the Board adopted the following resolution: Whereas, it is the intention of Brown and William~on Tobacco Corpora%ion of Petersburg, V~rginia ~o reduce its faciti~ie~ in the loca~ area by limiting ~perahions to exDor~ activities and transferring all domestic oDeraticR$ to Macon, Georgia; and Whereas, Brown and williamson ha~ ear ~ifhy years been an integral part of %he e~onomic ~ta~ilihy of the tri-ci~v ar~a and the surrounding counties; and Whereas, every effort is b~ing made to persuade Brown and Williamson to ~consid~r %heir decision ~o curtail local operationS, %hereby creating a destructive impact on th~ local families. Now, Therefore, B~ It ~esol~ed by the Chesterfield County Board of Sno~rvisors that this governing b0~y supporB~ the Petersburg te persuade Bro~ and Witliam$on Tobacco Company to reconsider i~s decision to relocate it~ domestic opera,ions and end productivity. might have to look at its taxes or other companies will be movin~ On ~otle~ o~ Mr. Denial, Seconded by Mm. Bookma~, the Board: I. Increased planned budget r~venue account 141-1-00012-103~ Chapter II School Library Grant by $170,216.72 2. Increased ~lanned Budget ~xDendi~re Accounh~: 141~1-22452-3261 Library/Art Supplies 141-1-22452-4513 Other ~quipmen~ 143,916.72 $t7~,216.72 On nohion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr~ Dodd, the Beard formally ~ccep~ed the ~ransfer o£ 1.32 acres with a .28 acre easement at Salem Church ~lementary School from the School Board and aethorized the Chairman and County Administrator ~s ex,cute any Vote: Unanimous On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded bp Mr. Dodd, the Board set Novembe~ 24, 1982 at 10:00 a.m. {or a public hearing to consider the conu~yanee of a parcel of land t.32 acre~ with a .2~ acre easement ~t Salem Church Elementary School. B2-427 ]n motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Do~d~ the Board set December 8, 1982 at 10:OD a.m. for m public hearing to consider ~n ordinance amending the business llcensm tax affecting Financial cervices. Mr. Micas indicated that this ordinance will reduce revenue in taxes to the County by approximately $20,000. Mr. Batdcrmon stated that the Board had held $ public hearing regarding the restriction of through truck traffic on osborne Road between Route 10 an~ I and requested the MighW&y Department continue with the review process and hold their public hearing. He ~tated before th~ Department will ~rocesd they WOuld like a resolution indicating th~ Board's support or opposition to this restriction. Mr. Mar~y Winastock Was present and stated that he WaS in ~avor o~ the restriction because the Govne ~$tats COuld be devmloped and add additional traffic on the road. ~r. W. Robert Floyd, President of th~ North Chester H~meownsr$ Association, was p~esent. He stated that it wam the responsibility of the government to provid~ for the safety of~Ae area residents which is what is needed at this location. He stated that there have been petitions si~ned, etc. for ~he past three years and now it h~$ iinal!y aaachsd the point for a decision. Me stated that Che~ter Road would be a good alternative for th~ routing of truck traffic. Ee ~tated children play in the a~ea mnd with trucks up ~nd down the Coed it is unmafe. He stated th~r~ wa~ an attempt bo hav~ a sidewalk installed but that ha~ never materialized. 9n motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board r~gueeted that tka Virginia DepaRtment of Mi~hways and Dransportatien restrict through truck traffic on Omborna Road, R0~te 616~ fEOm Route 1 west to Route VOte: Unanimous ~r. Frank Hedges was present and r~qu¢sted that the ~oard also ~pprov~ the rsstrictlon of through truck traffic on Osborne Ro~d ~ask of Jefferson Davis Highway to include Rio Vista, Coxendal¢, ~nd Arcadia. Me statmd the residents are concerned about the ~rea, have started e neighborhood watch program, ~tc. ~urth&r discussion, it was on motion of ~. Dodd, ~oo~2y~n, resolved that the Virginia Department of Mighways and Pr&nuDertation restrict through truck traffic on 0sborn~ ROad~ ~oute 616, and CoxendaI~ Roa~, Route 615, between Route 1 and the ~ichmmnd Petersburg Turaplke and on Rio ¥imta Street, Route 1537, ~nd Arcadia Avanua~ Route 1538. ~hin day the Count? Environmental Engineer, in accordance with lireotions from this Board~ made report in writing upon his ~xamination of Sacks Lane, Sachs Court and Shaker Drivs in River ~ed E~tat~s, Section 2, Matoaca District. Upon conmidmration whereol, and on motion of Mr. Dodd, ~e¢onded by Mr. Daniel, it im resolved that Sacks 5~me, sachs 2curt and Shaker Drive i~ River Road Estatem, Section 2~ Matomca )istrict be and they hereby ar~ e~tablished ag public roads. An~ be it further res01ved that the Virginia Department of ~i~hway$ and Transportation be and it hereby is requested to take .nrc the Secondary System, Sacks Lane, h~ginning at the .Dtersection wi~h Brickhouee Drive, State Route 1173, and runnin~ 82~428 southerly .05 milo to the intersection with Sasha Court, then continuing southerly .09 mile to the intarsect£on with Shaker Drive, then continuing southerly .03 mile to end in a dead end~ Sasha Court~ beginning at the inter~ection with Sacks Lane and running easterly .10 to the intersection with ~haker Drive, then continuing easterly .06 mile to end in a col-da-sac; shaker Drive, beginning at the intersection with Sacks Lane and running easterly .13 mile to tie into Sasha Court, again Shaker Drive, beginning at the intar~eotion ~ith Sacks Lan~ and ru/~ning w~Sterly .04 mile to end in a dead end. ~hose roads And be it further resolv~d~ that the Beard of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Highways right-of-way for all of th~e reads. This section of River Read ~stat~ is recorded as follows: Section 2~ Plat Book 29, Page 27, J~ly 21t 1977. Fete: Unanimous Thi~ day the County Environmmntal Mngineer, in accordance with directions from thim Board~ made report in writing upon his ~xamination of Laurel Oak Koad, Lauxal Oak Circle, Finch Court, Dlue Oa~ Road and Emery Oak Lane in Oakmont, Section 2, Dale District. Upon ~on~idera~ion whereof, and On ~otion of Mr. Dodd, seconded h~ Mr. Daniel, it i~ resolved that Laurel Oak Road, Laurel Oak Circle, Pinch Court, Blue Oak Road and Emery Oak Lane in Oak/~ont, Section 2, Dale District, be and they hereby are ~tablishod as public roads. And be it further rosolvsd, that the virginia Department of ~ighways and Transportation be and it hmreby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Laurel Oak Road, beginning at the end of Laurel Oak Road, State Route 306~, and running westerly .04 mile to the intersection with Laurel oak Circle then continue westerly .03 mite 5o the intersection wi~h FinOh Court, then continuing westerly .03 ~i]e to the intefuection with Finch Court~ then ccntinuinq westerly .14 mile tu th~ intersection with Blue Oak Court, then continuing westerly .14 milo to the intersection with Emery Oak Lane, then continuing ~osterly .12 mile to end in a cul-de-SaC; Laurel Oak Circle, b~ginning at the intersection with Laurel Oak Road and running southerly .04 mil~ to end in a cul-de~Sac~ Finch Court~ beginning a~ ~he interseo%io with Laurel Oak Road and running northerly .03 mile to tic into propesed Finch Court~ Falconbridge, Section A; Blue Oak Court, ~eginning at the intersection with Laurel Oak Read and running southerly .0~ mile to end in a cul-de-sac: ~mory Oak Lanc~ b~ginning at the intersection with Laurel Oak Read and running northerly .03 mile to end in a dead cud, These zoads serve 99 1Qts. D_nd b~ it further resolved~ that tho Board of Supervisors guaranteem to tho Virginia Department of Highways a 50 ft. right-of-way for ali of these roads ex0ept Luurml Oak Circle and Blue Oak Court which have a 40 ft. right-of-way. This section of 0akmont is recorded a~ follows; Section 2, Plat Book 37, Pages 4, 5 and 6, September 5, 1980. Thi~ day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from thi~ Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Pinch Court in Falconbridgu~ Section A, Dale District. Upon consideration whereof and on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Daniel, ih is resolved that Finch Court in B2-42~ Falconbridge, Suction A, Dale District~ be an~ it hureby is e~tablishsd as a public road. And be it further resolved that the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation be and i~ hereby is requested to take into the SecOndary System, Finch Court, beginning at the intsrmestion wi~h Falconway Lane, State Route 255~, and rnnning southerly .03 Mile to tie into proposed Finch Court in Oakmont, Section 2. This road serves as a th~ougk street. An~ he it further resolved that the Board ef Duuarvisors quarant~es to th~ Virginia Department of Hiohways a ~ ft. right~of-way for this road. This section of Falconbridqe i$ recorded a~ follows: Section A, Plat BOok ~0, Page 17, ~ec~ber 1, 1~77. Vote: Unanimous On motion o~ ~r~ Dodd~ ~econded by Mr. Daniel, the Board~ in accordanc~ with ~eotion 145.1-530 of eke Code Of Virglnla~ 1950, as amended, anthori~ed the Vice Chairman %o sign ~h~ ~s~rd mina%us and other records of the County on behalf 0£ the County. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconde~ by Mr. Denier, the Eoard respectfully requests the Circuit Court Judges to appQiDt James Walter Stan~y as a Police Officer for %he County of Chesterfi~l~ effective NQvembsr 22, 19S2_ O~ motion o~ Mr. Dodd, seconded by ~r. Daniel, the Board approved the recFaus~ ~oc binq0 and/or raffle ~ermits from th~ J. B. Watkins P.T.O. for cal~ndar year 1952 and from Mid-Gities Civic Association ~or calendar year t983. Vo~a: Unanimous Mr. Hedrick advised the Board of outs~andlng appointments. Ie was generally agree~ ~hat an appointment for thm vacancy on the Ap~amatto~ Basin Industrial D~veloDment Corporation would be filled after the new Matoaca District ~upervisor is appointed. On motion of Mr. Daniel~ seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board aeceptud th~ resignation of Mr. Dodd from the Richmond Regional ~lanning D~strict CommissiOn ~ffectivs ©stober 27, 19~2. appointed Mr, Harry Daniel to the R~hu~ond Regional Planning District Commission fulfilling the unexpir~ term of sr. Dodd which is until th~ first organizaticna~ meeting of th~ Board in January, 1983. On motion of ~[r. Dodd, seconded bv Mr.'Daniel, the Board accepted the resignation of ~. Richard L.' ~edriek f~s~ the A~pomattux Basin Industrial Developmen~ Corporation effective October $2-430 On motion of Hr. Dodd, seconded bv Mr. Daniel, the Board appointed }ir. George Wood&ll to the Appomattox Basin Industrial Development Corporation effective immediately and whose term will expire in September, 19S3, ~ulfillinq the unexpired term of Mr_ Richard L. ~edrick. It was generally agreed that the ~oard would not set a work session at this time to discuss the Nursing Home report bat individually with each Board member regarding this matter. Nr. ~rank ~e, Resident ~ngineer with th~ ~i~glnla Department of 32nd Virginia Highway and Transportation Conference would be hal: on November 1~ and 19~ a~ Virginia Military Institute. He ~tat~ tha~ the ~ighway Department wall gladly assist with stated she was interestsd. maximum safe e~eed limi~ on ~urner. Ha stated the study will that the high speed and insecure loa~e were causing some of the problems. successful and if s~, more will ba installed in the futura. ~ait until next ~pring to complete projeet~ ~cheduled. P~. Book~en referred to the conveyance of property at Salem Church Elementary for the road project and inquired if the se~e using the easement at A. M. Davis and it was net necessary to heys a conveyance. Mr. Bookman inquired i~ the Hi,twa? willingness to hold a public hearin~ and then could go to Mr. Daniel inquired if the Department could sweep the Mrs. Girone inquired if Buford Road would ~e closed in February. 82~431 21.B. /' h 12.c. 12.D. begi~ ih February~ but the actual closing by the ~ime bids were received, accepted, etc. would be ~ay. On motion of Mrs. cirque, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board adopted the following resolution: Whereas, the ViTginia Department of Yighwaya and Transportation is proceeding with the reconstruction of the Buford Road bridge, Project ~0678-020-209-C501, B659; and Whereas, this project Decessita~es the closing of Bu~ord Road, Eo~te 675, and rerouting traffic alonq Rockaway Road, Route 718, Rockcrest Road~ Rou~e 1709, and Larkspur Road, Route 1744; Whereas, this project ie in the COunty's S~condar¥ Road Si~ Year Improvement Plan and is scheduled for &~ertise~e~t in February, 19S3~ and Whereas, it is anticipated that reconst~uctlon of the Buford Eoad bridge will necessitate closing Suford Aced for approximately nine months. Vote: Unanimous On motion of MrS. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, %he Board approved the upgrading of a street liqht at the inter~sction of Huguenot Road and Shoreham Drive from a 3300 mercury vapor to 7000 mercury vapor light at an estimated cost of $153.80 with the~e funds to be expended from the Midlo%hian District Street Light Funds. Mr~ Paine~r presented the Board with water and sewer financial etatn~ reports. On motion of ~. Dudd, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board approved documents for the following sewer contract: S82-23CD/7(8)2232 - 36O Office Park, Phase I~ On-site and Off-site sew~r~ Total Ccnstructicn Cost! $i6,987.18 Estimated County Cost: $ 5,672.55 refund through connections Code: 574-1-11781-722I On motion of Mr. bod~, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board approved the request of the developers of Trueheart Heights for a ore year ex,on,ion Qf time un~il ~uvember 9, 1983 to receive refunde from water Connection f~es for Contract No. The Board received a list of developer water and sewer contracts executed by the County Administrator. 82-432 13. a repert on action taken against the developer of the Grand Summit Subdivision, a report fram the Schoel Adminls~ratien regarding Literary Loans and new regulation~ on septlc tank permit applications. On motion cf Mr. Bo0km~n, seconded by Mr. Daniel, fhe Bdard went by See~ion 2.1-344 amended. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Daniel excused himself from the Board meeting and stated that not be present for the aft~rn©e~ activities, which absence he had informed the Beard of earlier. 8~S070 SPENCE requested a Conditional Use te psrmit a real estate office in an Agr~culturaI (A) Distrief on a .968 acre parcel fren=ing approximately 100 £e~% en the east line cf Turner Road and located appreximately 300 feet nnrth of it~ intersection with Jessup Road. T~x Map ~1-7 (1) Paruel 43 (sheet 15). Mr. Balderson stated the applicant had withdrawn thi~ request. There was nc one presenY to discuss this matter. On motion of Mr~ Beckman, sesonded by Mr. Dodd, the Board accepted the applicant's request ~or ~ith~fuwal. Absent: Mr. DenieS. In Clover ~ill 5¢~gisterial District, SOUTHPORT D~VELOPME~T CaP, ORATION/DOUGLAS R. SOWERS, VICE-PRESIDENT requested rezoniag from Agricultural (A) and General ~usinese {B-3) 5o Light Industrlel ()~-I) with a Conditional Use Planned Development to permit u~e ~nd bulk exceptions to the requirements of th~ Zoning ©~dinance on a 45.49 acre parcel frontinq appreximatelv 650 fee~ on the ~outh line of Mi~lo~hian Turnpike end located approximately 958 feet east of its inter~ectien with Southlaka Boulevard. Tax Map 17-10 (1) Parcels 11, 12, 1~ and 15 (Sheet Mr. Balderson stated the applican~ had regussted a ~0 day deferral. motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by ~r. Do~d, consideration of the applicant. Ayes: Mrs. Girone, ~4r. Book~an an~ ~r. Dedd. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 79fi022 In M~loth±an Magisterial District, DONALD k. & ELTZA~BT~ HODGINS r~quen~ed rezoning frem Residential {R-15} to Agricultural (A} plus a Conditional Use f~r business and pre£essional sffices on a parcel fronting approximately 100 feet on B~ford ~ead and Iocat~ approximately 4~0 feet seuth ef its intersection with Pores= ~ill Avenue and bettsr known as 2538 Buford Read. Tax Map 10-6 (Sheet Mr, Baldersun ~tated the Planning C~i~sion had r%cem~ended denial of this reouest, Mr, Eo~gins was present and stated that 82-433 he had purchased this land in 1959 when adjacent property was vacant. He Stated that this proper~y has been rented since he has owned it. ~e stated that the Baptist Church has na opposition to the intended use, the real estate brokezm feel this is the best use of the Land, Mr. Dick Henshaw is in £avor of the request and the adjacent property owners have no objections. Re s~a~ed he felt this would benefit the area aS it would be a bmffer betw@en futura commer~ia! development and hhe residential depicting the area and letters of support. Dr. Martim was ~resent and stated that he fel~ thi~ resuesE wa~ a perfect solution buffering two different zoning districts end that i~ weald not be detrimental to anyone. Mr. Ashby ~ew~y stated that this case has been heard several times before and many residents, the Ben Air Communi=y and the Ben Air Ristozical Society are opposed. He stated that the character of Ben Air should be maintained am this will create a domino effect and ~hey do not wish to be rep!ac~d by business_ He skated there is no public s~w~r at %his location and the trafflo is very Dad which will become ~-orse~ H~ ~tated this ~ould b~ spot zoning. Mr. Dick Straus shah~d hi~ opposition tQ this request ae it would decrease %he value o~ resld~nce~ in Grand Summit which costs are in excess of 5100,000. ~ stated there ~xists a ~torm drainage problem now in Grand Summit which would become wors~ by approval of this request~ Mr. Elbert Hole stated that he felt ~he County could not deny a man the right to u~e his land a~ he sees fit as long as i% does not hurh a~yQne else wh~oh he felt this would not. He stated he was in favor of the raquesto 5~. Paul Stags stated that he had lived in the area for 16 years and that he feth Eh~ Board should guarantee the right~ of the residents and deny thi~ ~equest. H~ stated that he and other residents want to n~intain a family living area and stated that this would only set a precedent for future requests for business zoning. He stated %hat the residents do not have any alternatives but Mn. Kedgins does. Hs added a n~ed for office Mr. Thomas Van Auken and Mr. Earl saker also voiced their o~Dosieion to this request as it would 5~t a precedent for future business development. ~. Van Auken stated petitions are on file against this request. There were approximately 15 people present Mr, ~edgins s%a~ed his ~aughtsr lives in Grand Summit and he owns two other parcels as well and he would no~ de anything which would devalue the property or be a detrimen~ t0 ~h~ area. H~ stated that he wants to correct a ~ad situation which exists and he is not trying to hurt anyone. Mrs. Ct/one stated she had worked with Mr. ~dgins and the community. She stated tha~ ~h~ residents in the area believe %his parcel should remain residential in order to Prevent a domino eff~t of request~ fsr business develepment% She stated that she ~elt the parcel should r~main R-15 in order to prefect the community and its future. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded ky Mr. Do~d, The Board deDied this request ior razonlng. Ayes~ Mrs~ Gi~one~ ~. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. ~bsent: ~. Daniel. 82S054 IAmended} In Dale Magisterial District, BO~ESE ~NC. requested assorting from Agricultural (Al to Convenience Buslnes~ lB-I) plus a Conditional 82-434 USe Planned Development to p~rmi~ use ~nd bulk exceptions to requiremeDts Q£ the Zoning Ordinance on a ~$ acre parcel frontln~ approximately 170 feet on the west line of Turner Read And located approximately 10Q feet north of its intersection with ?;almsley Boulevard. Tax Map 40-6 (2) Joseph Brook~ ~state, Lot 5 (Sheet 15); and amendments to a previously granted r~zoning and Zonditional Use Plamne~ Development (Case ~18018) cna .439 ~ercel fronting apprexima~ly 100 feet on T~rner Road, also [renting approximately 140 feet ~n Walmmlev Boulevard~ and Ice,ted in the northwest quadrant of %he i~ersection of these ~oads. Tax ~iap 40-6 (2) Joseph Brocks Estate, Lot 5 (Sheet 1~ . {r. Bald~r~on stated the Planning Commission had ~pprcval of this request subject ~o certain conditions. 4ichael Bogese was present and stated the conditions were ~oceptsble. ~{r. BOokman stated thf~ parcel was in Clever Hill ~istriet at ene t±me and he felt this proposal would improve the )ppositi0n pre,eat. )n motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by }~. Dodd, the a~Droved this r, quest subject to the following conditions: 1. This amsndnent and Cenditional Use Planned Development shall be for the Durpo~e of operating a convenience gasolin~ sales and rebail center to includ~ any permitted Convenience B~si~es~ (~-11 use. 2. The ~onditions stated herein, notwithstanding, the site plan~ prepared by Degat, ~lrnd and As~oeiates~ ~nc., da~ed ~ay 28, 1~82, revised 8/2S/82, shall be considered the 3. In conjunction ~ith the granting of the re~ues%, e thiztv~fivs (35} foot exception to the required perking and sign not to exceed fifty (50) square feet shall be permitted identifying this development. The sign may be illuminated, but shall no% be luminous. All other signs shall be signs shall be luminous, but may be illuminate~. There shall be no "reader board" permitted. The colors and ~tyle buildings. Prior t~ ~rection of any signs, colored renderings shell be submitted to the Planning Departmen~ for approval. A~ e~terior lighting plan shall be submitted to the Planning both building lightimg and freestanding lighting. Ail project light into adjacent properties A six (6) foot high ~olid board ~ence or chain link fence right of way line and the setback line.~ A plan for ~hiz Department in conjunction with final site plan approval. Prior to obtaining a ~uilding permit~ 9orty-~ive (45) feet and =hirty-five {35) feet of right of way measured from the ~-435 centerline of Walm~ley Boulevard shall be dedicated to and for the County of Chesterfield, fr~ and unrestricted. 9. Prior to obtaining any occupancy permits, an additional twelve I12) feet of pavement, measured from the edge of the existing Davenant, with curb and gutter, ~hall be constructed along Turner Road an~ Wal~s!ey A~ul~vard. 10. The structure ko be erected shall be eimilar in color and style to the renderings submitted. ~o as %o align with the entrance/exit into the Insurance Offic~ property (Tax ~[ap 46-6 (i) Parcel 22). I2. In conjunction with the approval of this request, the Con=~ission shell gram= $~hematic approval of the plan of development. ~ee: Mrs. Girone, ~4r. Bookman and ~r. ~sent~ Mr, Daniel. In ~idlothian Z~agi~terial Distriet~ B.J. PROPERTIES OF V~RQIRIA, INC. requested ~exoning from Agricultural (A) to Office (O) plus a Conditional Use Planned Develonment to p~rmlt use and bulk exceptions tc the r~quirements of the Zoning Ordinance on a 135 acre parcel fronting appro×imaf¢lv 2,900 fee% on Ckippenham Parkway, also fronting approximately B0 feat on Jahnk~ Road, and located in the southwest quadrant of th~ intexsection of roads. Tax Map 19-1 (1} Parcel I6 and Tax ~ap 19-9 (1~ Parcel (sheets 8 and 99. 5pproval of thic request subject to certain Conditions. ~{r. John Qodcon, representing the Linmar Corporation, stated that on ~ehalf of all the attorneys present ~oday, they would like three members of the Board present and it was felt that only =hrce-~ifth~ of the Tounty wan being represented. Me stated this development was propoced to be larger than Cloverleaf Mall and it ~es felt it ~heuld be deferred until the entire County could be ~id represent a legal quorum and that the Board would proceed ~ith the case. Rhe stated the= Mr. D~niel ha6 a business meeting ~or which he had to leave and that there still exists a vacancy on the Boa~d for ~{atoaca Dictrict. ~r. Dexteu Williams presented t~e applicant's analysis of traffic ]attsrns in the area with and without the development and the ~ropesal ~rom the developers to widen and improve the road letwork. Me stated Tore Flynn with Wilbur Smith and Aseociate~ vas present if the Board had any questions regarding this ~raf~ic analysis. H~ stated further that the analysis did not include the eztension of Powhite Parkway which of cousse would ~elp the road network in~uensely. Be stated there are other ~arcels of land in the area and should they be devmloped, the Level of ~ervice for traffic will decrease. ~r. Ed Willey, Jr., representing B. J. Prcpertie~ stated that the ieveloper had agreed to 19 conditions prior to meeting with the ~lannlng Co~isslon and had agreed to 6 additional conditions at 5hat meeting. He utated that the plan~ for thc si~e cells for ~ill be developed and 50% will remain in its natural state. He ~tate~ tha~ millions oi tax dellare would b~ generated if thi~ ~evelopment were approved. Me stated that the use is compatible ~n~ that the functions to be carried out by the development ~ot occur at night o~ weekends. Me stated the developers have ~een plannin~ for this d~velopment for months prior to this da=e. ~e e~ated that they requested ~rom %~ilbur Smith what wa~ needed not what could be done minimally to impreve the traffic situation. He stated they have worked clo~elv winh Other propert? owners regarding buffers, snhematic plans, ate. He stated that the existing h½ acr~ lake will be u~ed for drainage steraga which sho=td increase the size to approximately 6 acres. He ~tated that the high, st building will be 6-8 stories, no higher than chippenham Hospital. He ~tated the improvements to roads will cost the developers approximately Si,E00,000 of which the County will not be asked to contribut~ any funds which improvements will be to Jahnke Road, chJ.ppenham Parkwavr Bufurd, a flyover and ChinaberrV. Hr. John Dodson was present representing L~nmar Corporation, whose property is most directly affected by the Chinaberry Drive extension. He stated that a survey was also accemplishsd by Paul Royer of Roye~ & Associates regarding the traffic situation. stated fhey were concerned that Chlnaberrv had been dedicated, but n~ve¥ accepted into the State System,-that th~ street is not in aliqnmeDt with the street acros~ ~he inter~ec~ion; that their survey indicates there will more traffic on Chinaberry than anticipated which is a privately maintained street? that it begins as four lanes but decreases to two: it was felt that the C~OSsover sheuld be closed, eta. ~r. Koyer stated that even if of the proposal and if the flyover is n~t approved, the project flyover being constructed and this could be in operation and with development and the flvover will not be built. ~r. Micas ~ullv. He stated he felt the Chinaberry and Chippenham square bottom lin~ was that Midlethian Turn~{ke has mere traffic than it Midloihian Pike. He stated hs felt traffic being disbursed at tO wha~ ~. Royer was saying and inquired if he had calculated on certainly would hslp remove the volume on Midlothian Pike, social life, privacy and safety in their neighborhuods. He Ha state~ the ~sin street through the project will be engulfed by ~2-4~7 the City. ~e stated the City was opposed to this rezening request b~cau~e of the petential drainage impact on the Powhits Park end the' traffic impact on the City's roads caused by the Executive Park. Re eta=ed ne apparent c~n~ideration has been given regarding the developments under construction on the City side of Chippeuhem Parkway north of Midlothian Turnpike. He stated that all areas will be worse than they are now, except the intersection at Jahnke ~oad. Ee stated the City ham no philosophical problems with the development except ~hat it was felt That the timing of Chis devele~ment is inappropriate and ill=advised. Hu stated that it was felt that until =he extensio~ of Bowhite Parkway is added to the road network, a ma~or development such as this will only exacerbate the already unacceptable traffic ~±tuatfon in ~he ~ounty and City. He state~ that th~ City dOes~ however, support the Ceuntv's efforts to extend Powhlte Parkway. Mr. Dudd stated that the City coul~ help with the traffic situation and added he did not feel the water would drain to the Si=ye Mr. Bookman stated that the City i~ opposed to thi~ development, but supports the Powhite Parkway extension ~hich ar( =we different matters. Mrs, Bryan ~iller stated that she had moved to the Village a yea] residents can tolerate as most of the play and recreational mrs adjacent to Chinaberry ~hich will receive the additional traffic. A p~tition signe~ by 507 Darkens was presented to the Boar~ in M~. Dods©n stated he felt it would be appropriate if a time limi± ,sere placed on the construction of the flyover, ~e stated that ~0,000 $~. ft. of 0£~i¢~ space and the hotel ~an be conStruCted with Chinaberry as the only singl~ acce~. ~. Earl Man~en~ representing ~outham and Rock Creek ~ark, they were opposed %0 this approval as they were users of Jahnku Road which ie already at an unacceptabl~ level, Jahnke Road has no shoulders, and if Chinaberry were to be ~iden so should Jahnke. E~ stated they were concerned with the safety and traffic ia the area, Re ~tated he also represented the Ben Air Civic Association which consisted of members o~ the Boa Ai= Civi~ Association, Crestwood Farms and the Buferd Road Corridor. He ~tated they did not have a position, however, if there were to a significant increase of traffic they would like the matter deferred until an independent traffic ~tudy could be M~. Bernard ~yer, attorney r~presenting Ms. Vivian ~asterly, prior to d~velopment in this area, for example, improving Jahnke Parkway e~tension which he did not f~el would be a reality to be constructed by the Highway Department. He stated that the millions referred to in taxe~ ie equal to approximately from Chipp~nham to Jahnke. ~e stated that they have to co =o either be ~enled cr ~sferred for further ~tudy_ Mr_ M. B. Wkitt was present and showed slides of a 12 inch ditch on hie property ~*bi~h can now accommodate e bulld0eer. He ~ta~ed %h~t drainage is a problem. He added that increase~ traffic will remult in additional ~afefy problems with childre~ loadin~ and unloading from school buses. ~r, Slumberg~ a member of the developing team, s~a~ed they would be happy to asphalt some drop of* areas f~r children if right-of-way was donated, Mr. Lyndall Dunning stat~ that also concerned with ~raffic and flooding problems. Mr~ Edwin Gadberry, representing four residents to the north--the Winters, the I~grams, th~ Harrisons and the Stut=e, stated they were concerned with traffic. He stated the ramp exit will cause problems and requested denial for safety reasons even though it is a beautiful Mr. Whit~ stated tha~ KME properties are across the road, s~ated that Lewis and C~ens did study drainage. He stated it is felt that drainage will be retarded~ but not retained on the property. ~ ~tated that with a 100 Fear storm which £~ 1% the storms, =here will be four inches of ~ater on $ahnke Road. ~e stated this is in a ~lood plain. He ~stated thim has discussed for three hours~ but all the information on dralnsge, traffic and other developments in ~he area have not been obtained. He stated the Board would be r~mi~s if it were net after mur% tax dollars for ~he County but he felt this would generate mere traffic than ~en be handled. Ee eta=ed their engineer statp~ that it will cost approMimately 3~ million dollars =o do the road improvements outline~ and it is the developers' estimate that it will cost cnly 1% million. He stated h~ ~elt a ninety day deferral would be in order. ~s. Alie~ Lundie, representing the American Orchid ~eciety, stated that there ar~ 1~-1~ species of orchids in the Powhite Park and they did not ~ant drainage from the development destroying thes~ F~. Willey stated the applicant woul~ be willing to list in condition 1SA that construction of the flvov~r will be completed within 36 months from issuance o~ the ~ir~t building permit. Mr. White suggested that it be constructed first in order to move their construction vehicles in and out of the area rather than Un chinaberry. Mr. Dodd stated that this was the lowest density f~r a d~velopment of ~his nature that he has seen in Chesterfield County. Mr. Bookman stated that h~ could not believe only 5% of the vehicles would t~avel north on the flyover. Ee stated that he did net feel alt were aware that ~OO% apar=ment~ are approved for cons%ruction at Chesterfield Village at this tin%e, =ha% he has to believe that fha traffic pattern will have to i~prov~ with this d~velopment as professionals have made the studi%~_ ~e s~ated he felt that perhaps Powhite Parkway Extension will begin within 12 mon~h~ b~t even at that, it will take five year~. ~e stated ~ha= the drainage engineers should be a~le to oversee that aspect and if =he area needs several retention basins, that will have =o be acCOmplished. ~ state~ the developer has offered to improve the road network which ls needed but the ultimat~ Solution would be Pewhite Parkway, Mrs. Girone stated that the developers are committed to building what is outlined. She stated that this is a plan =hat will take approximately lQ years and will be done in ~ha~es and that it is a good buffer and will b~ an appropriate us~ for the land. She stated that regarding the traffic aspect, she has to rely on what the professionals in this field have projected which indicates that the road system will be better with th~ development and improvements than without, she stated that there will be a S2-~39 Dmprehensive study involving staff regarding the drainage which ill be monitored throughout the development. She stetud that he felt this development Was ~ood for the region and hopefully, ~white Parkway Extension will-be approved ~or construction by lly, 1983. motion of N~r~. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dcdd, ~he Board }proved th~s request subjec~ to theimpusition of the following ~nditions; The eQsditiens stated herein notwithstanding, applination and textual statement, dated August 23, 198~ and master plan, dated August 2, 1992, shall be ~onsidered the plan of development. gives final approval of any particular ~o[d Working interpre~a~ion~ of any and all ¢onditien~ and/or exceptions to the application shall be made by the Planning Commission ~t the request of the Planning QsDartment upon submission, review and approval Of schematic piano, zequire~ by Section 21-34 (1} (4) c of =he Zsning Ordinance_ Furthermore, the CormAliesion may conditionally approve schematio plans to ascertain that they will Le in Conformance with ~ke approved master plan and other applicable Ordinances. Except where expressly r~ferr~d to herein, approval of this appI~eation do~a net guarantee that th~ developer can build or construct faeili%i~ in the future in accordance with restrictive than those established herein, the County may r~quire eo~etrua~ion to adhere to the more resqric~ive standarde. A co~y of any covenants, deed restrictions and amendments related tO the property owner association shall be aDprov~ by the Plannimg Departmen~ and ~be County Attorney,s Office for adherence to County Ordinances prior-to recordation of such documents. No us~s ~hall be permitted which would ~se any water or sewer system other than the Chesterfield County public u~ilities system. Approval of this request does not obligate the County to extend w~ter or sewer lin~s. All eMt~nSions and nmces~ary improvement comte shall be borne by shall be submitte~ to and approved by the Utiliti~ Department. Motwithstan~ing~ the exceptions to use and bulk regulations granted here~n, approval of the application by tko Board Supervisors does not obligate the Planning Corm~ission to approve a p~rtieular schematic plan which is not in conformance wilt the spirit, inten~ and purpose of this The number and lc~atien of fire hydrants shall be determined by the Chomter~ield Fire Dmp~r%ment. The developer shall b~ar ~he cost for installation of hydrants. The buffer and landscape areas described in the applicant,s textual statement shall consist of vegetation and/or topographic conditions ~¢hich will provid~ year-ronnd adjacent rsmldential develomm~nt. In conjunction with mahematic plan approval, the aDDlicantm shall submit specific landscaping planm ~e the Planning Commission for approval. There shall be no clearing or grading within these buffer areas until approval of the lands~aming plans by qke Planning Commission. All buffer ar~as shall be 82-440 installed in conjunction with the phasing of the development. All utility linee shall bs provided with underground distribution. [1. AIl private drives (where there is no adjacent shall be paved to a width of not less than 25 f~et with curb and gutter. Depending upon the particular situatiOn~ this condition Ray bE modified ag the tSme of Echematis plan [2. Ail exterior lighting Ehall be low-level and positioned so as not to project light into adjacent residential properties. The deEign of light fixtures shall be approved by the Planning Commission in oon~unetion with schematic .3. The applicant end/or d~veloper shall provide an accurat~ account of the drainage situation showing existing drainage and hhe impact individual tracts, as they are developed, The developer shall submit plans fox on- and off-site drainage control tO ~nv~ron~enhal Engineering for approval. The plan shall explain the method and facilities to be utilized i~ the hydraulic engineering of the project. These plane shall be approved bv Environmental Engineering prior to th~ clearin~ of any la~d. It 2hall be understcsd ~hat Environmental Engineering may impose conditions, that proper drainage control is provided for and ~aintained. The approved plan shall be implemented in whatever stages or 4. For individual t~acts, as they are developed, the applicant and/or developer shall ~ebmit plane for erosion ~n~ sediment comprised of v~q~tativ~ and ~nglneering practices to be project. Generally~ such practices shall b~ those outlined ~n th~ Virginia soils and Water Conservation Commission's "Erosion and Sediment Control ~an~book, and Edition, However, it is tn be under~tood that a~ditional requinem~nts and measures may be instituted by EnviFenmental Engineering upon review of the plans. The ptan~ shall he approved by Environmental Engineering prior to any clea~ing Or ~rading. The plan'm measures shall he implemented prior to ¢learin~ of any lnnd, c~t~ing of anl~ trees or otherwise 5. Th~ e×act design of intersections shall be approved by the Planning Commission at the time o~ schematic plan review, and such improvements shall be sa constructed as to yield no lesger lmvel of service (inclusive Of d~velopmen= traffic} than currently exists. Road improvemente proffered by the applicants and required of this dev~lopment are as follows: a} Jahnke Road/Chippenhs~ Parkway interchange snd aoces~ - T~ese ~mprovements ~halI be in accordanc~ With the I!lu$=ra%ive Plan, Exhibit 4 of the application~ and shall be complet~d within 36 month~ Of the issuance of the ~irst building permit. 82-441 19. b) Chinaberry Drive from Route 60 to the Jahnke ~oad/Chippenham Parkway in~erchanqe - This i~provement shall be in accordance with the criteria specified in Conditions 1 an~ 2 on pages 1~ and 20 of the Traffic Impact Study, s pert of the textual Chinaberry Drive, as spocifled fn the aforemuntioned Conditions 1 and 2, shall be constructed and open to traffic, prior to the issuance of any temporary of the Traffic Impact Study). Chinaberry Drive be accepted into th~ State system prior to the issuance o~ any final occupancy permit (This supers~de~ Condition 4, page 20 of the Traffic Impact Study). c) Chinaberry Drive/Mfdlothian Turnpike intersection - Thi~ £~pr~¥smenT shall be 4n accordance with the criteria specified on page 20 of the Traffic Study, a part o~ the te×T~al statement, with the stipulation that completed means State acceptance. Improvements ~hall bs constructed and open to traffic prior to the issuance of any Temporary occupancy permit. (~his condition supersedes Con~iSion ~ pag~ 20, of the T~aiflc Impact STudy). d} Jahnk~ Road/Buford Road intersection - This improvement shall be in accordance ~ith the plan shown on ~iguro of the Traffic Impact Study. This improvement shall be made and accepted by the State prior to issuance of occupancy permits for moro than 250,000 Square feet plus the hotel. Ail State-maintained road~ ~ha!l harm a minimu-m thirty-six (36) fe~ of pav~mmnt and curb and gutter. At the time of %he first schematic plan revi~, a plan be submitts~ which shows whichever of the fcllowin% treatments of the Aldwoll Drive ~nd Eureka Drive stub roads is appropriate: a) The developers shall be responsible for implementing a plan approvsd by tho Planning Department and the VDHAT for the construction of permanent cul-de-sacs and/or the vaeatlon of elthor or both aforementioned stub roads to the subject parcel. It shall be tho developer's responsibility to acquire and de~icate the necessary right of way, relocate u~ilitiss and construct the cul-~e sacs. This shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of any final occupancy p~rmits. b) The developer shall be ~osponsible for scnstructing SLat~-malntaine~ road between Chinaberry Driv~ and either one or both stub roads. Riqht of ~ay for Powhite ~arkway cone=ruction shall be reserved and dsdica~ed, prior to the issuance of the first building permit. At th* time of the firs% schematic plan review the plan must ~nolode a provision for construction of a Stats-maintained road between Chinaberry Drive and adjacent properties, located between the prOpOSed development an~ Jahnke Road, and between the propose~ d~vmlopment an~ sitterding t~act. with the exe~ption of three (3) buildings including the hotel, no Structure ~hatl exceed six (¢) Stories. Tho three (3) structures to include the hotel shall not exceed eiqht (8) stories. (This condition supar~odo~ Article Iii, Divioion 4. Section 21-38 Generally {c) of the Textual Statement). 82~442 21. Restaurant facilities co,rained in a separate ~uilding or supersedes Article X%V, Section 21-148 Permitted Uses (q) of the Textual 22. Directional signs shall not exceed 100 c~uare feet in area (This condition is in addition to Directional Siqns/Park Directori@s of the Textual Statement). FreE-standing signs shall be limited to two (2) face~ (This condition is in addition to Free Standing Identity Siqns cf the Textual Statement). 2~. Building signs sh~ll be limited to one company name and/or company logo ehall be affixed ~o as not to project more than 18 inch~c from the building stTu~ture (This ~upersede~ Buildin9 Siqns 2. and 4. of the Textual Statement). An undisturbed and/or evergreen replantmd ID0 foot buffer shall be provided adjacent to r~gid~tial development. How~ve:, exceptions based on topographical configuration, as shown with cross sections taken throuqh the individual locations, may be granted by the Planning Con~i~glon a% the time of mchemgtic plan review (This condition Division ll. Buffe~ StriDe, Section 21-67. Gmnerally of the Textual Statement). Ayes: ~rs. Girone~ 55r. Bookman and Mr. DodO. Absent: Mr. ~aniel. In Bermuda Magisterial District, MiKE BARd & ~A¥}~ND requested rezoning from Ag~icultural (A) to ~ecidentia! Townhouse-For-$ale (R-TH) of a 28 acre parcel {~onting approximately 400 feet on the noxth line o~ Centralia Eoad, and located di:ectly across ~rcm i~$ inters~ctlon with Old Centralia Road. Tax Map 97-1 (1) Parcel l, 97-2 (1) Part of Parcel 5, and 97-7 (1} Parcel 2 and PaTt of Parcel 15 (Sheet Mr. Bal~ercon stated that the Planning Cor~i~cion had recommended denial of this request. The applicant was not present. There appropriat~ ian~ use and i~ was not ~n the beet interest of h~al~h, safety end welfare of the area. On mo~ion o~ ~r. Dedd, seconded by ~r. Book,an, the ~oard d~nied this request. Aves: Mrs. ~iroAe, ~r. Bookman and ~. Dodd. ~Jussnt: ~r. Danlel. In Bermuda Magisterial District, A}~NA ~ADE requested rezoning from ~eavy Industrial (~-3) to Agricultural {A} of a I1.~ acre parcel ?renting approximately ~0 feet on ~he nert~ line of Bellwood Road an~ located mppro×~tely 1,850 feet east of its intersection with Haven Avenue_ Tax Map 68-6 (2) Bellwocd Farms, Le:s %3 and 14 and Tax Map 68-10 (2) Be!Iwood Farm~ Lot 15 (Sheet 23). Mz. ~ald~rson stated th~ P%anninq Commission had recommended denial of the request, but approved a Conditional Use Planned Development subject to certain oondition~. ~r. Wade was present Indumtrxal {M-2) to Agricultural (A) but approved a Conditional Use Planned Development subject to the fo!!owiDg conditions: When the p~e~ent occupants are no longer in sesldence, all mobile homes sk=ll be removed ~rom the property. All bulk requirements of the Agriculqural (A) DistriCt shall be applicable with the exception O~ the ~ear yard setback which may be reduced 9rom twenty-five (25} feet ~o twenty (20) feet, 3. The above ~tated conditions notwithstanding, the site plan submitted with the building permit ~pplication shall be censldered the Master Plan. 4. In conjunction with the granting ef this request, the Planning Ce~mi99ion shall grant schematic plan approval of the Master Plan. This CondicionaI Use Planned Development shall be for renovation and expan~i©n ef the existing residence and construction of a garage. Ayes: ~rs. Girone, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd, Absent: Mr. Daniel. requested a Conditional Use to psrmit a structural ateel business (stOrage en~ ~ale) ~n an Agricultural (A} District on a 1.7 acre parcel fronting appru×imately 130 feet en the north line of M£~lethian Turnpike, also fronting appruximately 140 f~et on Robious Road an~ lying between these t~'o roads~ and located approximately 1~250 feet we~t of the Rcb~ous Road/~idiothian Turnpike intersection. Ta~ ~ap 17-7 (1) Parcel 19 (Sheet Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission had recommended approval of thi~ request subject to certain condftiou$, kir. John they would be out hopefully by February tSth but would prefer the Boerd extend the time tQ March l, 1983 in the event something happens. He added the property is for sale. when asked, Mr. Dodson assured the ~eard that the cable had not been taken down On ~otlon of ~rs. Girone, seconded by Mr. ~ookman, the ~oard approved this request subject to the imposition of the following a permanent barricade shall be erected along Robious Road to preclude untll ~arch l, ]983~ Upon e×piration~ the structural steel B2SOB6 In Matoaca Magisterial District, BOR-AIR PUILDERS~ INC. rezoning ~rom General Business (B-3) to Light Industrial IM-1) a 26.4~ acr~ parcel fronting a~9ro×imately 876 feet on the west l~ne of Jefferson Davis Highway and located Oireotly across its intersection with Kovac Street. Tax Map 163-7 (1) Parcel {Sheet 49}~ Mr. Balderson 9tared th~ Planning Commis$iun had rsco~ended approval of ~his request subject to a single condition. Mr. Jeff Gollins was present representing the applicant an~ ~atsd the condition was agreeable. There was no opposition pre~ent. On motion of Mr. Dodd, ~econded by ~r. Beck,an, tbs Board approved this regue~t subject to the f~llowing condition: ~-444 A fifty {50) fOOt buffer shall be maintained along Jeffers0n-Davis~ighway. Other than a single and confined entrance/exit, there shall be ne facilities uermittsd within this b~ffer. The entrance/exit shall align with Pin~ ~ore~t Drzve. ~0wever~ if it is determined by the Planning Department and VD~&T %hat a second entrance/exit will not cause a hazardous traffic situation or create congestion, such entrance/exit shall be permitted. The exact location of the entrance/exit ~hall be approved by the Planning ~yes: ~rs. Girsne, Mr. Bookman and }~. O~dd_ Absent~ Mr. Daniel, 82S090 In ~toaca Magisterial Distr~t~ CALCOUR~ PROPERT%~, r~qu~sted rezonin~ from Agricultural (A} %0 Residential (R-9) of a 1.~7 acre parcel ~hieh lies aDproximately 170 feet off th~ east line o~ Gary Avenue~ m~asumed from a point located approximately 800 feet north of its i~tersection with South Street. 149-1~ (1) Pamcet 4 (Sheet Mr. BalderSun stated the Planning Com~isslon had race.ended approval o~ this request. Mr~ Cal Sea~on was pre,eat and stated thisp0rtien was left out Of his original application. Ther~ wa~ no oppe$i~i©~ preaen%, on motion of ~r. Dodd, s~conded bv Bookman, the Board approved ~hie request. Absent: ~. Daniel. on motion of ~r. Dodd, secunded by ~(r. Boekman~ th~ Board adjourne~ ~t 5~35 p.m. until ?:D0 p.m. on Noveuber ~, 1982, Ayes: Mrs. ~irone, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. Absent: Mr. Daniel_ Ric~a~ L. H~driek County Administrator g n~ birone " 82-445