Loading...
02-24-1982 MinutesFebruary 2~; 1982 upervisorg in Attendance: ~r. ~. Mmrlin O'Neill, St., Chairman ers. Joan ~irene, Vice Chairman ~r. C. L. BookMan ~r. Harry ¢. Daniel ~r. Bisher~ L. Hedrick ~ounty Administrator ~upervisora kbsent: Mr. R. Garland Dcdd Staff in Attendance: Mr. Stanley Balder$on, Hit. of ~lsnninq }fr. Phil Heater, Dir. of Parks ~ ~ecrea~ion Mr. Elmer Hedge, Aemt. Co. Administrator }{r. William Howell, Dir. of ~eneral S~rvices ~r. B~bert Ma~den~ Dir. of Human ~ervices ~r. Steve ~ioee, Co. Attorney Mr. Jmffrey }4~zzy~ Dir. of Co.~unity Develop. Mr, Robert Puintmr, Dir. of Utilities Mr. David Re,va, Admin~ of Juv. De%ea. Home O'Neill called the mee~i~q to order at the Courthouse at a.m. Hr. Bookman gave the invocation. Dn motion o~ ~{r. Daniel, seconded by ~rs. Girone, the Board ~pprovad tbs minutes of February 10, 15 and 18, 198~. ~y~ ~r. O~Neill, Mrs. Gircne, Mr. ~ookman and M~. Daniel. ~bsent~ Mr. Dodd. ~r. 5edge mtated that the Board had instructed staff to discuss ~ith employee~ and receive input regarding the health care insurance. Ha stated that this had b~mn ~cco~olished an~ shaf~ ~ould be accepting propesal~ for health care coverage and would %av~ a report back to the Board of proposals received wi~hln the ~ext 90 days. H~ ~ate~ the existing coverage will continue xntll proposals are r~ceived and a new contract negotiated. Hs ~tated that Blue Cross/Blue Shield has indicated %kev will be ~ub~itting a modification to the plan and a~ded utke~ companies ~I1 be submitting proposals. Mr. Beck,an inquired if ~paci£ications had bean written an~ if other carriers were to be ~otified. Mr, ~edriGk stated that insurance is not bid ~ pipe~ =ars, etc. in that this is a professional ~ervic~. Mr. Hcdqe stated %hat proposals are bein~ requeste~ of firms large enouqh :o service an aCCount as large as Chesterfield and that ef~ort~ ~ere being ma4e to promote competition. ~r. Bookman inquired if ~11 carriers were aware of this. Mr. Hedrick stated this type of [nforma~ion is widespread within th~ in~urance bunlness. ~r_ Belder~on stated the County had received an award from the Vlr~ini& Chapter of the American Society of Landscape Architects for '~Excellence in the Enhancement ef Man's N~t~ral and Built ~nvironm~nt." B~ stated that the award recognized the excellent planninq which went into the selection of the site 9or the ~outhern Area Land~ill. He stated the Southern Area Landfill 822063 ~it~ S~tectlon Stud? ~as praised by the review panel for its therough consideration of 'poSentiai sites With compr~hensiv~ criteria and its transferability for use in other jurisdictions. Ee ~tated the panel was comprised cf one representati~ from planning, landscape ~rchiteeture and en~ineerin~ prc£ession~. He stated the ~anel reviewed over thlrtv entries from Virginia and th~ Count? received one cf only four merit award~ giv~ by th~ penni. ~e stated the work wa~ aecom~Iished primarily by =he COmprehensive Planning Division and involved representatives from the State Department of ~alth and the Stat~ Water Control soard~ the County Soil Scientist and the Departments of ~eneral Services and EnvirOnmental Engineering. Mr. Hedrick stated this date and time was scheduled for a oubllc hearing to consider an ordinance rela~i~g to se~er connection Welchons, ouaif~, ~zzy and himm~If had met with representatives kad requested a 30 day deferral of =his matter. He ~tated that they plan to submit an alternative to the suggested amendment. There was no one present tc sddr~ss this matter. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board continued the public hearing ~or th~ ordinance rela~ing to sewer connection fe~s and extension fees until March 24, 1982, at 1O~OO a.m. Aves: ~u. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone~ ~ir. BOokman and Mx. Daniel. Absent: ~r. Dodd. Rfc Hedrick stated that this date and time had been schedule~ for the County Administretor'~ public haarin~ relating to the use of law, tbs chief administrative Officer ~ust hold a ~ublie relating to the nme of Revenue Sharing Funds at least seven days Drier re the budget being ~ebmitted to the governin~ body. He stated the County would Be receiving $1,SI7,U00 in R~venue Sharing Fu~s this yeaz. He stated in the past, the funds have been used to uupp!ement the General Fund, have been designated for teachers' salaries, for matching f~nds for road improvements by the Virginia Department Qf Highways end ~ransDortatiou, etc. There was ne one present in the audience to addrss~ the Mrs. Girone stated that there had been s hearing the previous evening regarding improvement~ to Robious Road ~ut the landowners ~ere not interested in having the shoulders of the roa~ widened and the ditches moved beck and th~ funds designated for this project would now be available for other preject~, It indlca=ed for informational purposes, that there cuzrentlv a proposed bill which would increase th~ matching funds from 15% to 25% which Senator Frederick Gray is Sponsoring. There being no further discussion, the public hasting was declared closed. }~r. Howell ~tated the bids had been received ~©r the continued operation of the Chester landfill which current contract expires ~n February 25, !982. He stated that although th~ bid ~ ~cnsidered responsive, staff requests that awarding b~ delayed for 60 days as provided in %he bid contract. He stated that this time would allow for fun=her investigation of other alt~snatives. Mr. Kedrlck stated that two firms interested in solid waste disposal have r~quested an opportunity to appear b~fe~o the Board. He stated their plans involve a ~egiunal facility which would involve %he County as well as ?etersburq, Prince Geerge, Eopewelt, Colonial lleiqhtg, and Richmond for which County participation is also requested. He stat~fi tha~ if the proposals were accepted, the County would not need a southern area landfill but if not, the Coun~v ~ed~ to move o~icklv. ~e stated once bids were solicited, ~ther itemn of i~teres~ surfaced and this 60 day deferral would ~rovide the time needed to invest/cate all alternatives and suggested a work session with the Bo~rd. Mrs. Girone stated she thought all alternati~*es had been discussed and that wes th~ reasen for the hoed issue for the landfill. ~[r. Hadrick stated the bond issue referred to a solid waste disposal facility which mllopz~ for otter options. He ~tatad the County's neighbsring jurisdictions %~ant the County to consider this option as wall. ~rs. Girone ntated she was Opposed to a transfer station and thought this had bean decided. ~Bsdrick stated the Beard had never made a formal dec/sion On this imatt~r. ~iz. Daniel stated that events change daily this l~mue and all options should ha considered. After further dlsuusslan of the matter, it was on motion of M~. Daniel, seconded by Mr, Bookman, resolve~ that bid award for the continued operation of the Chester landfi]i be delayed for 60 days as provided in th~ hid dOCument, the Board authorized staff to negotiate a 60 day extension to the current sarvic~ contract ~t a rat~ up te the low bid rate On the new contract and th~ Board waived the bid requirement pursuant to Section 2-10 of the County Code for the t~o month e×ten~ion because of the emergency need to provide continuity of service beginning March l, I982, and the ].ikslihood that no ~na els~ can ef£activelv pTovide service for such a short time. Ayes~ Mr. O~Nsi!l, ~r~. Gl:cas, }{r. Bookman and Mr. Daniel. Absent: }4r. Dodd. ~r. Daniel stated staff ~hould taka necessary precautions lnsura that a nouthern area landfill will be available when needed, if alternative~ are not ~easible. Mr. Daniel stated ~he Richmond Regional Planninq ni~trict Commission woul~ be s~onsorinq a seminar on solid waste dispOSal mn March 8, 1982. Mr. Robert Masdeu stated that the Juvenile Detention Moms is cna of the ~inest and well managed facilltias in the State but it is Over capacity mos~ o~ the ti~e. He sta~ad the hume was designed to contain 13 boys and 9 girls when it opened in 1~73 aa~ there has been a tremendous qrowth in the Home's population and the Capacity is frequently exceeded. Mr. David Reeve stated when considering this ~rohlam, CoAonial Haightn expressed interest us it also experiences a space problem and it is in the same ~udiciaI dlstriet a~ Chesterfield and h~s to rely on other jurisdlctic~s for containment on a space available basis. H~ requested permission for the County to begin discussions with colonial ~eiqhts for consideration a~ a joint venture in this matter for an addition which could be constructed to serv~ both localities. ~e provided the Board with proposed architectural sketches for the addition. After further discussion of the matter~ it was on mQtio~ of Mr, Daniel, ~econded by Mrs. Gir0ne, resolved that the Board ia aware o~ the problem of crowding at the Juvenile Det~ntlon Koma and hereby authorizes the County ~dministrator to enter into discussion with the City ef ColOnial Heights as a ~int v~n=ure tQ construct an addltiQn ~o the Qet~n~ion ~om~ per the report submitted to the Board and filed ~ith the papers of this meetinq. ~yas: ~{r. O'Neill, ~{rs. girone, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Daniel. ~s~nt: Mr. Dodd. Dn marion of Mr. Book, an, seconded by Daniel, the following ~esolution wa~ adopted~ Whereas~ the School Board for the County of Chesterfield on ~he 24th day of February, 19~2, presented to this Board an ~ppllcation addressed to the State Boar~ cf ~ducation of Virqlnia rot the purpose of borrcwin~ from the Literary Fund ~o apply to the erection of a ne~ Mid!othian'High School to be ~aid in 20 installments, and th~ interest thereon at 3 per cant )aid annually. Resolved, that the application of the County School Board to :h~ ~tate ~csrd of Educatien of Virulnia for a lean of S2,0O0,0O0 hersby g~anted tho said County ~ch~oI Roard to borrow t~ said amount for the purpose set out in said application. Th~ Board of Supsrvi~ors for said County will each year during the lifo Of this loan, at the time th~v fix the regular levi~s, fix a rate of levy for scho~ls or make a cash appropriation sufficien~ for operation expenses and to pay this loan in annual installments and the ±at,rest thereon~ as required by tbs law regals%lng loans from the Literary Fund. Avast Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Gircne, Mr. Bookman and ~r. Daniel. On motion of Mr. Bookman~ secondsd by Daniel, the following resolution was adopted: whereas, the School Board for the ¢ount~ of Chesterfield on the 2~th day of February~ 1982, presented to this Board an application addressed to th~ State Board of ~ducat{~n of Virginia for the purpose of borrowing from the Literary Fund $2,000,Q~0 to apply to the ~racticx of a Genito Rend Elementary School to be paid in 20 installments, and the interemt thereon at 3 ~er cent paid annually~ Resolved, that the application of the County School Board to the State ~oard of Education of Virginia for ~ from the Literary Fund is h~reby approved, and authority is hereby granted the said County School Board to borrow the said amount for the purpose set out in g~i~ application. The Board of Supervisors for said County during the life of =his lean, at the time they fix the r~gular levies, fix a rate of levy for $~hools or mak~ appropriation sufficient for operation ~xpenses and to pay this loan in annual installments and the intsrest thereon~ as r~quired by the law regulating loans from the Literary Fund. Aves~ Mr, O'Neill, ars. Girone, Mr. Book, an and Mr. Daniel. Absent= Mr. Dodd. On motion of ~r. Bookman, seconded by Daniel, the following resolution was adopted: Whereas, the School Board for th~ County o~ Chesterfield on the 24th day of Eebruary, 1982, prssented to this Board an application addressed to the State Board of ~dueatinn of Virginia fo~ the purpose of borrowing Item the Literary Fund $2,000,000 %o apply to the erection u~ a Courthouse Area Elementary School to be paid in 20 in~allalents, and the interest thereon at 3 Der cent paid annually. Resolv~d~ that th~ application of ~he County School Board tc the Stat~ BOard of Edusation of Virginia for a loan of $2,000,000 from the Literary Fund is hereby approved, and authority is hereby granted ths said County School Board to borrow t~e said amount for the Purpose s~t OUt in said application. The B©a~d of Supervisors for ~aid County will each Year during the life of this loan, at the ±ime they f~× the r~gular levies~ fix a rate of levy for ~chools Or mak~ a cash appropriation sufficient fo~ operation expenses and to pay this 82-066 authorized the bidding cf school buses at the present time aa requested by the School Afi~inistretian which a~ard is contingent upon the appropriation of fund~ on July 1, 1982. Ayes: Mr. O~Neilt, Mrs. ~i~one, ~. Bookman and ~r. Daniel. Absent~ Mr. Podd. On motion of Mr. Bookman, s~conded by Mr. Daniel, th~ Board autherisad the County Administrator ~o mubmi% an appli~ti@n and aceeFt funds, if approved, for $7,i00 Ior the Litter Control ~rogram in the County from the Division of Litter Control. Ayee: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Siron~, ~.~. Bookman and Mr~ Daniel. Absent: ~r~ DodO. ~L~. Ken Cronin~ Executive Assistan% to ~he County Administrator, stated Chesterfield Cable Communications would like to add a new independent ~ete~ision station, WRL~-TU, to their bas{o cable package a% no additional charge to customers. ~e stated progra~in~ wilt include syndica%gd ~howe, none of wh{ch are oarrled b¥ other local channels; prime-time movies; children's ~hows~ reli~iaug programming ~nd co,unity ahowg. ~e St&ted this will require the combination of the Virq~hig/Reqional N~w$ and National/World News Channels which ara d%qital ~ith no information being delete~, jugt not shown as often. He ~tate~ that thio ia a local channel with offices in Rich~ond and a roi;er in Midlo~hian. He stated the Board could hold a DublXe hearing to consider this matter or take action at this meeting. On mo%ion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Daniel, tke Doard agreed that a public hearing would not ba necessary as thio is an additional aervice and approved the inclusion of the WRLH channel to the Chesterfield Ca~le Cc~.muni~a%ions ~ro~ram by amending the franchise aqreement to include same~ Ayes: ~r. O'Neill, Mrs~ Giron~, ~ir. Bookman and Mr. Daniel. Absent: Mr. Dod~_ On mo~ion of Mrs. Girone~ ~econd~d by Mr. ~ookman, ~he Board approved and authorized the Chairman to execute a release on behalf of the Co~nt¥~ for a deed of trust for Clyde W. an~ Joyee Ward which was ~eguire~ by th~ County when the Chesterfield Policeman's Pension and Retirement B~ard transferred ail of its assets ~o the County as a Dart of an aqreem~nt which brought the Police Department personnel under the Countv's ratlrement sy~te~. Ayea: Mr. O'Neill, Mrm. ~irone, ~r. Bookman and I~, Daniel. On motion of Mr. Girone, seconded by ~r, Daniel, the Board set a public hearinq date £or Y~rc~ 24, 1982~ at 1O:OO a.a. to con~ider an ordinance amending Chaptu~ 8 by adding Section 8-14.2 ralatin~ to tangible per~onal property tax exemption for certain ~arr~ animals. Ayes: Mr. O'N~ill~ ~Irs. Girone, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Daniel. A~sent: Mr. Dodd. On mo~icn o~ Mrs. Girone, seconded by Nr. Daniel, the Board authorized the Count~, Treasurer to negotiate short term loans not to e~ceed $S,000,000 in accordance with Sec%ion 15.1-545 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, and %he rate of inter,mt as determined is in compliance with Section 2~1-326 of the Code of virginia, sa amended. Ayes ~r. O'Neill~ ~4rs_ ~irone, ~. Bookman an~ Mr, Daniel. kbsen~: Nr. Dodd. 82-067 12.C. budgeted. ~. Hedge indicated a certain amount of funds %~ere budgeted~ On motion of ~rs. ~irone, seconded by Mr_ Daniel, the B~ard approved and authorized the County ~ministrater to execute any necessary documents for the construction of fencing at Matoaca ~igh School to Forge Fence Company, Inc. Who submitted the low bid of $2,702.22 which funds a~ to be exQ~nded ~rom bond funds. This day the County ~nvironmental Engineer, in accor~anse with direction9 from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Johnston Willi~ Drive, Midlothian District. I~on cease,station wher~of~ and on motion of ~rs. Girone, seannded by Mr. Daniel, it is resolved that Johnston Willis Drive, Midlothian District, b~ and it hereby is established as a public road. A~d be it fur%her resolved, that the Virginia Department of Eighways and Transportation, be and it h~reby is rs~uestsd to taka into thm S~$ondary System, Johnston Willis Drive beginning at the northern right-of-way line of ~h~ west b~und lane of Midlothiam Turnpike, ~ate Ron~e 60, and goin~ .44 ~il~ northerly ~o e temporary cul-de-sac. Thim road serves Johnston Witlim Hospital and the adjacent medical buildingb. And be ~t further ~esolved, that ~he Board of SuPervisors guaran%ee~ to the Virginia Department of Eighway~ a 60 ft. right-of-way for this road, Johnston Willis Drive is recorded as follows: 91at Book 40, Page 72, February 18, 1982. Ayes; Mr, 0~Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr~ Bookman and ~r. Daniel, Mrs. Girone inquired abou~ the =onnestor road to Johnston Willis ~ospital. Mr. Balderson stated this should b~ accomplished by the spring. Mrs. Givens inquired if this resolution would ha~e any impact on the connector road. Mr. Eald~rson ~taqed it should e~Dedita it. Ou ~oti~n of Mrs. Girone, seucnded by Mr. Daniel, the Board approved the requests for bingo and/or raffle p~rmi~s ~or the following organizations for calendar year 19S2: 2. Stanhope Junior Women's Club 3. C. E. Curtis ~lementary School 4. A. M. Davi~ Athletic Association On ~ohion ~{ ~rs. Girone, ~cond~d b~ Mr. DanleI~ the ~oard approved and authorized th~ Chail~man ~o accept a deed of dedication on behalf of the County f~om the ~ehool Board for 33± 82-06~ immediately and who~e term will expire en July 1, 198~, which fills the ~n~xpired term of Mr, Kelly Miller. and will expire on October ll, 1984. the youth member for Bermuda District effective immediately and who~e term will expire On June 30, 1983. ~-~sent: Mr. Dedd. Mrs~ Girone requested deferral of consideration of an appointment to the Citizens Transportation Advisory Com~littee for the Richmond Area Metropolitan Planning O~ganlzatien because when she appointed Dr. ~umphrias to the Citizen~ Advisory Board she intended for him ~o serve on both ccn~ittoe~. On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Yr. Daniel, the Board appropriated $2,5Q0 from the Matoaca District 3¢ Road Funds for shaping the roadbed~ improving drainage, etc. to Treoly Bead. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, 5~s. ~irone, ~{r, Book, an and ~r. Daniel. Absent: Mr. Pod~. Mr. Frank Gee, Resident Engineer, wi~h the virginia Department of ~ighways an~ Transportation, wa~ pre~nt. H~ stated that tker~ would be a public hosting on the Bufor~ ~oa~ ~rid~ project on March 3, t982, at 7:30 pom. at ~on Air Blementary School. Mr. ~ee s~atsd the R0ekwood recreational access projmct had been awarded to Shoosmi%h ~rothsrs. He staled the Bellwood Road projeeh bids had been received with the low bidder beinq J. M. Martin who su]~mitbed the bid of approximately $410,000. ae sta%~d tbiM contract had not yet been awarded but a decision should be made within 45 days. ~r. Gee stated the Salem Church Road project had been deferred to March, %982 as it wa~ not bi~ in February. Mr. Daniel stated he would not aceep~ any mere deferrals on the project unles~ a reason wa~ given. Mr. Gee indicated ther~ were some £inancie% problems with the project. ~r~ Daniel ~ated there had recently been an accident at 5opkin9 and Indian Sprin~ and ~t~ted that h~ has mentioned this ~rea ~o inhered%ed in having safety improvements at ~opkins ~oad and Chippenka~ Parkway. Mr. Gee stated this project was limted in the Board's priorities. Mr. O'Neill ~tated prior to any project~ being considered and re~olutions adopted, the Board should meet to discuss the entire roa~ situation and repriori~ize because of th9 low amount of funds available for work. Mr. Daniel stated 5e 16 .A. I~.B. would llke to see a plan Worked out even if it is ~et implemented immediately. Mrs. Girone thanked Mr. Gee for attending the me~tin~ regar~inu Robiou~ Road on February 23, 1982. She requested e meeting with Mr. Gee the followlnq day tn discuss road matters. Mr. Bookman stated that he understood the U-turn in front of Manchester ~igh School would be cleared uD and thanked klm for this work. Mr. Bookman inquired if ~ewbys Bridge Road would be improved as he would like to use Revenue Sharing Funds on the project, Mr. ~ ~tated plans were to resurface with tar and qravel but at this time there were no pl&n~ ~or plant ~ix. Me stated that should the County wish to u~e Revenue sharing Funds to resurf~c~ the road w~th Dlant mix, then h~ would l~k~ to be. aware of this as some funds could be reallocated to the resurfacing. ~r. ~ookman inquired about canvassing %h~ area and ste~ed if a me~ting were zcheduled he wmuld like to be notified. ~r. Bookman, Er. Daniel and Mr. O'Neill expressed concern for potholes and patching of th~ roa~s which ~as M~. O~eill stated he would like to have lines painted on ~ailey Brides Road at the turv~ Qff Of Route 360 and signs elac~d. Mr~ Gee stated the signs had been placed but he would check into the painting of road Nines. Mr. Painter presented the ~oard with the sewer end water financial On motion of Mfs. ~irone, ascended by Mr. Daniel, the Board approved tSe following adjustment of aDproprlations for indicated water and sawer projects: 1. ApproDriated from 563 Surplus, $3,165.~ to 3SO-1-61631-4393 for W$I-63C, ~non Church Road. This amount is needed in order to cover the cost of ~00 additional feet of 12 inch pipe than was origlnally e~timated. 2. Transferred from 3S0-1-61000-4393 (Fire Hydrant Installation Budqet) $1,840.00 tO 3~Q-1-61631-4393 fur W81-63C. This transfer will cover the cost of one fire hydran~ ~ot called for in the original bids. 3. S$!-89CD - Solar II, Section C - A~roDrlated ~E~SO7.81 from 57~ ~urplus to 380-1-71S92-7212. This additional reques~ is being made because ro~k was encountered along the oversized ~ewer lines. This amount of $8,507.81 r~fle¢~s the additional rock that was excavated. Ayes: Mr. O~Meill, Mrs. Girone, ~. ~ookman and Mr. Daniel. Absent: Mr. Dcdd. approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute a purchase agreement on b~half of the Cuuntv for ~.~$ ~cre~ for the n~w Dale Park ~ntrance in the a~ouAt o~ ~35,00~ which ~un~s are to be expended from the Bond Funds which site in loc=ted across from the entrance to the County Airport. Av~: Mr. O'Neill, ~r$. Girone, Mr. ~ok~au and Mr. Daniel. 82-070 water contracts executed by the County Admlnie%~ator. }ir. Hedriok stated the County had been formally notified that the roads in the fol].o~ing subdivisions had been accepted into the stat~ ~scead~ry ~ystam effective as indicated; Length Salisbury, Marlbourough Pewees, Section 2 (2-9-82) Solstice Close = Beginning at intersection with Mount Hill Drive, Route ~048, and ~eing .27 mile northeasterly Co a cul-de-sac. 0.27 mi. Brigsteck Road - Beginning where State maintenance ends on Route 1014 a~d going 0.15 mile nOrtheustsrlv to inter~eeti~n with Stonegat~ Read, then O.~8 mile northeasterly to intersection with E!le~mere Road, th~n Road, Route I014. 0.32 mi. Ellesmere Read - Beginnin~ at inter,to,ion with Brigstock Road and going 0.07 mils southeasterly to tie into proposed Ellesmere Road, P©wdsrham, S~ction C, 0.07 mi. gtonegate Read - ~eginning at intergection with Brigstock Road and going 0.11 mile southeasterly to the intersection with Lintel Lane then 0.08 mile ~outheasterlv to a temporary turnaround. 0.19 mi Lintel Lane - B~glnnlaq at intersection with Stunegate Road an~ going 0.18 mile northwesterly to a cul-ds~sac. I 0.18 mi. Barrow Place - Beginning at intersection with ~rigsteck Road, Route 1014, and going 0.14 mile ~outheasterly to i~tersection with Grey Priers Lane/ ~hen 0.22 mils southeasterly to a temD©r~ry turnaround. Q.3S mi. ~rey Friars Lane - Beginning at intsrse~tien with Barsow Place and going 0.21 mile northwesterly to a cul-de=sac' 0.21 mi. ElfLnwood Road ~ Beginning at end of ~lfinwood qoa~, Route 5592, and ruenln~ easterly 0,03 mil~ to the inter~ection with T~t~rling Road. 0.03 ~i. Teterling Road - B~inninq at the interDection with Elfinwoe~ Road and runnin~ northerly 0.i3 mile to end in a temporary turnaround~ again Teterling Ro~d, beginning at the intersection with Elflnwood Road~ running southerly 0.11 mile to end in a temporary turnaround. 0.24 Glamor~an, Section t Oakengat~ Lane - Beginning wher~ S~a~e maintenance inter~ection with Glamorqan Lane, the~ 0.07 mile ~asterlv to a cul-de-saC. 0.12 mi. Glamorgan Lane - seginning at intersection with Oakengate L~ne and going 0.1I mile southerly to a temporary turnaround. 0.11 mi. Stafford ~lac~, Sections ] ~nd 3 Eeinhold Drive - Bsginning at the intersection with 82-071 O. 16 mi. Bi×by Lane, Route 719, and running northeasterly 0.16 mile to the intersection with Van Nos~rand Lane. ~tafford Place, Section 4 (2-3-82) Van Nee=rand Lan~ - Beginning at the intersection with Reinhold Drive and runnin~ southeasterly 0.09 mile to the intersection with Hagerty Lane. 0.09 mi. He,arty Lane - Beginning ~t the intersection with ~i~by Lane, Route 719, and running northeaste~iV 0.20 mile to ~he intersection with Van Nostrend Lane, then continuing northeasterly 0.17 mile to end in a cul-de-saC. 0.~7 mi. Ashley ~ood, Sections A & D (2-3-82) G!enmont Road - Beginning where State naintenanc~ ends on Route 27~4 and going 0.03 mile w~sterly t6 intersection with/WoOd Bluff Loop. 0.03 mi. Wood Bluff Loop - F~om Gl~nmont Road runnin~ in a circular direction 0.36 mil~ to reintersect GlenmoMt Road. 0.36 mi. Oak Forest Rs=ares, Sections 1~ 2 & 3 (2-3-82] Glenlivet Drive ~ Be~innin~ at the intersection with Halloway Avenue, Route 722, and running westerly 0.07 mile ~o the intersecton with Glenlivet Court~ then CO~tlnuing w~sterly 0.15 mil~ to end at the intersection with Shire Oak Drive. 0.22 mi. Oak Forest Estates, Section 2 (2-3-82) Clenlive~ Court - Beginning at the intersection with Glenlivet Drive an~ running northerly 0.0~ nile to in a euI-de-sac. O.0~ ~i. Oak Form= ~stafes, Section 3 shire Oak Drive Beginning at the intersection with Glenlivet Dr%ye and running southerly 0_10 milo to end in a temporary turneround~ again ~hiz~ Oak Drive b~ginning at the inte~eection with Glenlivet Drive and runnin~ northerly 0.~9 mil~ to en~ at =he in=artec=ion with Per=tweed Lane. 0.19 mi. Pertkwood Lane - ~eginning at th~ intersection with Shire Oak Driv~ and running westerly 0.04 mile to in a temporary turnaround, again Perthwood Lane beginning at th~ inter,to=ion with Shire Oak Drive and runnin~ e~$terly 0.15 mile to the intersection with Perthnhlre Street then continuing northe~l? Q.O5 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. 0.24 mi. Oak Form= Estates, Sections 1 and 3 (2-3-S~) Perthshire Street - Beginning at the intersection with Hmllowa¥ Avenue, -~Qute 722, and running westerly 0.09 mite to sad at the intersection with Per,tweed 5an~. 0.09 mi. Fe~n.hrook, Section C Fordham Place - Be~innin~ at its intersection wi~h Fordham Road, Routs 769, extending southwest 0_03 mile tO a cul-de-sac. 0.03 mi. 82-072 Ereeayard Section A (2-3-82) Oreenyard Road - Beginning at IrOnbridge Road, Route 10, extending westerly 0.54 mile to a temporary turnaround. 0.Z4 mi_ Solar II, Section A (2-3L82) W~st Providence ~oad - Beginning at intersection with Courthouse Read, Route 653, and going O,l~ mile westerly to intersection with Providence Place, then 0.07 mile we~terl? to inter~ction with Previdence Place, then 0.07 mile westerly to intersection ~ith Cendrey Rid~ Drive, then 0.15 mile w~stsrly to a temporary turnaround. 0.~0 mi. Providenc~ Place - Beginning at intersection with ~est Providence Road ~nd 9ding 0.05 mils northwesterly ~o a cul-de-sac. 0.05 mi. Condrey Ridge Drive - Beqinn~ng at intersection with W@Mt Providence Road and going 0.07 mile northwesterly to tie into proposed Condrey Ridge Drive, Section B, Solar II. 0.07 mi. Five $~rin~s (2-3-82} Five Springs - Beginning at intersection with }~illrid~e Parkway, ~OUta I920, and gDin~ ~.03 mile northerly to inter~ection with Five Spr~n~s Court then 0.02 mile northerly to a dead end. 0.~5 mi_ F~v~ ~prings Ceu~t From the intermeotion with Five Springs Road end goinf 0.02 mile easterly to inter,eot with itself, then 0.09 miI~ im a ~irculaz direction to reintersect with itself. 0.tl mi. River Oaks, Sec%ion C Eamthempton Driv~ - Beginning where ~ate ends, Route iQ52, and going 0.02 mile northwesterly tO a cul-de-Sac. 0.02 mi. Old Buckingham Forest, Ssoti©n F Deerhurst Drive - BeginniDg where State maintenance ends~ Route 1355~ and goin~ 0.08 mile nOrtheasterly,to intersection with Tremolo Trail, ~hen 0.06 mile northeasterly to intersection with Olde Coalmin~ Ro~d, then 0_06 mile nerthgasterly to interDection with Drif%in~ Circle, then 0.03 mile northeasterly tO tie into existing DeerhurEt Brive, Route 1232. 0.23 mi, Tremolo Trail - geginnin~ at intersectien with Desrhurst Drive and ~oing O.OS mile [o a dui-de-sac. 0.08 mi~ Olde Coalmine Bead - Bm~innin~ at intersection with Deerhurst Drive and ~oing 0,06 mile southeasterly to %is into existing ol~e Coalmine Road, Reuts 1265. 0_06 Drifting Circle - Beginning at intersection with Deezhurst Drive and going 0.03 mile southeasterly to a cul-de-ssc. 0.0~ mi. 5Ientwood, S~ctions A & B (2-3-82) Bel[ield Road ~ Beginning at the intersection wi~h B~u!ah Read~ Route 64I, and running southeasterly 0.15 mile to the intersection with Bel~ie~.d Court, then ~ontinuing southeasterly 0.06 mils ta the int~rsectSon with ~awpans Court and P~wp&ns Place, then continuing southeasterly 0.06 mile to the intersection wi%h Slack Oak Road, Route 3075. 0.27 mi. Rrenhwood, Section B Belfield Court - ~eginnin~ at the intersection with Belfisld Road and running northsasterly 0.13 mile ko ~nd in a cul-de-sac. 0.13 mi. Pawpans Court - Be~innlng at the inter~tion with Bel%ield Road and running wsst~rly 0.09 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. 0.09 mi. Pawpans Place - ~glnning at the intersection with Relfield Road and running easterly 0.14 mile to end in a cul-de sac. 0.14 mi Additions (2-4-82) ~ntranoe to ~Onaoan ~igh S~hool 0.48 mi. Chesterfield Technical Center Entranc~ - Beginning at Courkhou~e Road, Route 2099, and running in a loop for a distance of 0.10 mile and returning Entrancs to Lloyd C. Bir~ High School 0.$~ mi. Mr, Ma~den pre~ent~d the Board with a r~pert regarding the size and compensation of the Chesterfield County Community Services Board. It ~a~ generally agreed tha~ ~his ma~ter would be deferred until March I0, 1992. It was generally agreed the Board ~ould recess for lunch. Reconvening: 02S021 In Rermuda ~!agi£terial Distric~ william W. Franklin requested a Mobile Home Psrmit ~o park & ~ubile hom~ on pro~art¥ which 67-10 (3) Rayon Park, ~lock K~ Lots 2~41 and b~tter known as 7816 Senate Street, ~r. Franklin was present and ~tated the conditions ~qreeable. Mr. O'Nsill inquired how long Mr. Franklin intended %o have a mobile home a~ ~his l~ation. Mr. Franklin indicated he felt five years would be adequate time in which t~ construct approved the ~squest for a mobile home permit ~ubjeot following aonditions~ home slta, nor ~haI1 any mobile home be used for rental property. Only one (1) mobile hoP~e shall be psrmitted %0 be ~2 074 3. The minimum lot size, yard setbacks, required front yard, ahd other zoning requlram~ts of the a~ulicabl~ zoning district shall be c0~,Dlied with, e×cap~~that ne mebile home shall be located closer than 20 ~eet tu ~ny e×isting residence. 4. NO additional perManent-type living space may be added onto a mobile home. All mobile homes shall be skirted but shall not be placed on a permanent foundation. Personal 7ood~ and articles $hall not be stored nnderneekh the habile home. 5. Wh~re public ICounty) water and/o~ m~wer are avsilabier ~hev, shall be used. 6. Upon being granted a permit for a mo~%l~ home, the applicank must then obtain the neceSSary permits from the Ruilding Inspector's Office. This must be done prior to the installation or Telooation of the unik, 7. Any violation of the abova conditions shall be grounds for In Clover E%ll and ~{idlothian Magisterial Districts, Midlothian gran=ed Conditional USS Planned Development (Case ~79S142) to in Evergreen. This property lies in two separate tracts. The its we~% line. Tax ~ap 2~ (1) ~art of Parcel 6; Tax ~ap 36 Parcels 7 and 8; Tax MaD 37 {1) Parcel 2 and Parts of P~rcele 1, 3, 5~ 9 and 12; Tax Map 37-3 (1) Parcel 16~ Ta~ Map 37-7 (1} ~arcet l; Tax Map 48 (1} Parcel 48 and Parts of Parcel 4~ 7 and t3). Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commi~slon had recommended denial of this reque~t~ however, the apptican% has requested 81S149 In Dale Magisterial District, R~alty Industries, Incorporated requested a Conditional Usa P~anned Development to per'it retail sale, ou%~ide stor~ge and display of Christmas trees and ~re~h produce in a Community easiness (B-2) District on m p~rcel which lies approximately 420 ~eet off the north l~ne of Meadewdale Boulevard ~ea~ured from its intersection with Mopklns ~ead and bett~r known as part of Meadowdale Shopping Center_ Tax Map 52-I2 (1) Part of Parcel 6 (Sheet 15}. Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission had recommended approval of th~ request sub4ec= to certain conditions. Mr. Larry Hcr~on was present representing Realty industries and stated the c©ndition~ were agreaabl~. There was ne opposition present. On This Conditional Uss Planned Development shall be limited The area to be utilized for this purpose shall b~ confined All signs advertising this use shall be govsrned by the · he site shall be maintained in a neat orderly fashion. the plan gubmifted with the application. M~dlofhian Magisterial District, ~hoaf Sales, Ino. re~ue~ted ~nd display in a Convsnience Business (B-I} District on a 1.07 9asr of its intersection with Robious Road. Tax Map 17-12 ~arcel 11 (Sheet 8). ~onditions were a~reeabto except thaa ~erhaps dimensions should indicated rather ~han specifying a ~ecific type of tractor in %ondition ~1. It was generally agreed that the specific typ~ of Jractor would ~e adequate rather than specific dimensions. sh~re was no opposition present. ~onditions: ?his Conditional Use Planned Development shall be limited to equipment of e~ual si~e) shall be ~old from the property_ will be accomplished shall be submitted to the Planning Ail signs shall blend with the architectural style of the proposed building and shall not be luminous, but may be illuminated. Prior to araetlon, ¢olor@d renderings shall be freestanding sign shall be permitted. Ail repair services shmtl be conducted entirely within the inLezlor of the proposed building. 6. NO mere than ten [10} pieces of equipment shall be displaysff outside at any one time. ~h¢ above stated conditions notwlthstan~in~, all bulk requirements of the Convenience Business (B-i) District shall be applicable. 8. The above stmt~d conditions notwithstanding~ th~ site plan submitted with the applicabion~ dated November, L981, shall be considered the master 91an. The arohlt~ctural style Of the building shall be approved by the Planning Commission in conjunction with schematic plan (Not~: Prior ~o obtaining & building pe~it~ schematic plans must be submitted to hh~ Planning Commission for ~bsen5: Mr. Dodd. 82S003 In Midlo~hian Y~.~isteri~l Di~tri¢~, ~app Hardware and Building ~upply requested an amen~enh bo Condition ~D of a pzoviously grmnted Conditional Use (Case #755157 to permit a forty-seven 147) square foot illuminated sign as opposed to the tw~nty-~ivm 125~ square foot non-illomina~ed sign previously pzrmitted. This parcel fron~s a~proximatelv 310 feet on the north line of Lmdloth~an T~rnp~k~ an~ ~S located appro~ately 2000 ~aat of its intermeetion with Otter~ale Road. Ta~ Map 15-10 parcel 2 (ghent 7). . Mr. Balderson stated ~he Plannlnq Commission had recommended approval of this request subj~st to certain condition~. ~tr. Rapp was present and state~ %he conditions were a~re~able. There was no opposition prement. Q~ motion of ~rs. Girone~ seconded by ~r. ~oekman, the Board approved this ~eques[ subject to the i~pe~ition of the following conditions: 1. By approval of this request, Condition ~5 of the previously granted Conditional Use shall be a/~ended to psrmi~ a forty-seven (iT) square foot illuminated si~n. This sign ~hall be installed as depicted in the rend~rinc submitted with the application. Further, the materials end color~ be employed shall be those identified in the rendering. With the exception of directional signs for entrances and exits, and temporary signs which shall be regulated 5y the r~quiremen~s e~ the Zoning Ordinance, no other Oo~merciat smqnage ~hall be permitted on the parcel Or attached to the buildinq_ Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, ~rs. Giren~, Mr. ~oo~an and Mr. Daniel. ~sent: Mr. Dodd. In Midlothiae Magisterial District~ Esindl-Zvans, Inc, requested an amendment to Condition 94 of a previously qrantmd Conditional usa [Case ~76S!29) to ~elete the requirement to plant within the fifty (50} foot buCfer along Robioum Road. This 1.7 acre parcel 82-077 front~ approximately 350 feet on the north line of ~i~lothian ~urnpike and is located approximately 700 feet west of ~heir intersections end better known as 10050 Midlothien Turnpike. Tax ~ap 17-7 {1) Parcels 21 sad 15 (Sheet qr. Ba!der$on stated the Planning Commission had recommended approval of this request subject to certain conditions. Mr. ~ompkine was present r~preeenting the applicant and etated the :ondi~ions were acceptable. There ~as no opposition present. On ~otien of Mrs. Girone~ seconded by ~, Bookman, the Board ~pproved this request subject to the imposition of the following ~enditions: [. The existing fence ~hall be repaired and be properly maintained so 5s to accomplish a visual screen from Robio~s Ro~d. A land~caping plan for that area lying between th~ fence line and the right-of-way of Ruble, s ROad shall be submitted to Development Review for approval. This plan ~hall include planting or ornamental ~hrubs end tr~g sufficient to break the monotony of the fence line. Approved planting shall be accomplished no later than ~ay 30, ~ye~= F~. O'Neill, Mrs. ~irone, Kr. Bookman and ~r. Daniel. ~s~nt: ~r. Dodd. in Clover Hill~ Matoaca and ~idlothian Magis%trial ~rrill Natural Resources, Ins. rs~uests a Conditional Use ~Ianned Developnent to permit the mining of materials end renoval ~f natural earth resources {including 9a~ and oil) from the earth ~nd ~ubsoil. Th~ applicants are requesting permission to drill ~nd unspecified number of exploratory wells and if resources are ~ound~ to produc~ these resources. This request comprises ~pprcximahely 1,2~0.52 acres whioh lie in the Richmond Coat Basin lad more ~pecifically are Shown On parts of ~onln~ ~heet, 2~. 4, ~/6, 7, ~, II, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 27, 28, 29 35/36, ~7, ~8, 44 ~nd 45. ~r. Bald~r~on stated the Planning Qcmmiseion had recommended ~pproval of this request ~ubject to Cmrtain conditions. Mr. :t~ve Delanev, of Mc~uire, Woods and ~attle, was present ;epresantin~ the applicant. He stated that h~cauee of the ,pposition in Powderham they would withdraw the Adamson lea~d .and from the request. Mr. Delaney explained the difference ~atwesn test, exploratory ea~ production wells. He ~tatad test ~ells cannot become e~plorstory wells until another r~quest is ~r~aented to th~ Board of Supervisors. Mr. Bookman stated h~ {alt another condition should b~ added which would require a :onditional us~ if a well ware ad, scent to a zoned ~ract of land or residential property. Mrs. Girone stated that ~ould be a procedural matter an~ perhaps this cauc could b~ ~d~ressed now and ~he overall operating procedures a~dreesed at ~ater dJte. Mr. Micas stated test well~ Were permitted anywhere ~s the zoning ordinance did not addres~ them. Mr. Merrill was oresent and stated that he felt the people in Powderham did have ~ legitimate 'complaint and that was why they have withdrawn that Qortion. He ~tated that there are thousands of acres in which ~hey plan to drill and there are no subdivisions ed%scent 5ut in ~ha event there were, they would cooperate in every'way It was agreed that staf~ should notify Other companies that the 2ounty would be consistent in the recommendation that e separate ~onditionat use would be required when residential land is ~djacent to any well sit~. ~r. Jim Richards of the Powderham ~ubdivsion wes Dreeent. He ~tated the r~sid~nt~ were concerned ~ecauee they did not know 82-078 what was going ca, c~nc~rned for the value of their homes and th~ safety cf their children. '~r. Richerds stated further that there were no requirements for fencing 0% %he sites, truck~ %reverse uD and down the roads and %hat the situs where the holes are drille~ leave a quicksand t~pe cf situation. He stated that the residents feel they should be notified of whatever happens in this area. Me stated that a DeLition was circulated the evening p ~or to ~hl$ hearing w~th 85 s~gnakures obtained which represents almost 100% cf the subdivision in opposition to this request for the ?ewderham area+ After further discussion of the matter, it was On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, resolved that thio request be approved subject =o the following conditions and with the ~limination cf the Powderham area from the request: 1. The applicants shall submit to Development Re~zisw espies of plans suhmitte~ to the State for approval. These plans shall be maintained in the Communlt¥ Development office for the purpose of identifying the exact locations of wells. 2. Operations shall be confined to betwee~ 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m., 5~onday through Saturday_ No Sunday operations shall be permitted. The hours of operation mmv be modified by th~ Development Review Staff if it is determ~ued that such modification will be of no detriment ho area property 3. If any material, other than dirt, shone and/or rock is buried on the sit~, a plat showing the location of the fill area shall be submitted to Develoomemt Review and recorded in the Circuit Court Room with th~ mroperty Construction of any facilities over'a fill area shall not be pel-mit~ed unless soil engineerln~ studies provid~ the suitability of such construction. The method of fill shall be a pert of the reclamation plan. ~. Prior to extracklom for commercial uae from any (produ=~imn wells}, separate conditional use approval shall he obtained for those wells. At the time of review, staff may impose conditions relative to the protection of tho health, sefaty and welfare. If any exploratory well i~ ~ithin 500 feet of any $ubdivlsion as well as within any subdivision th~s well shall receiv~ ~eparate conditional us~ approval. ~yee: ~r. O'Neill~ Mrs. Girane, M~. Bookman and }ir. Daniel. Mr. Dodd. ~2~010 ~n ¢~cve= ~ill Masistsrial D&skric%, Mifllothien Company a Conditional U~e ~o permit an ontdoor recreation facility in a Residential (R-7) District on a 7 acle parcel which lie~ approximately ~O0 feet Off the ~Outheast llne of Oueensgate Road ~easursd from its intersection with Royal Ridge Road, Tax Map 26-19 (1) part cf Parcel 1 (Sheet 7). ~r. Baldersen stated the ~lanninq Commission had reco~t~cnded ~eniel of this request. ~e distributed an addendum %o the s~aff ~eport relaning to pa~king areas and ~rivmwavs serving the ~acilitv. Mr. Jim ~aye9 was present representing ~he applicant. ~r. Eayes stated a meeting had be~R held with the engineer of ~epco, Mrs. Girone and ~r. Boo.an and all are in ~greement with ~h~ conditions. Mr. Boo~an state~ that he under~too~ the )allfield would b~ for t~e-ball and there would not be a safety ~robl~m with balls hitting the wires. ~Ir. Haves indicated that ~as correct_ Mr. Daniel also mentioned his c~ncern for the ~afety and %hat if they were oAly small children thi~ would not )re~ent a problem but if the children wer~ as old as ~0 or more 82-079 it could. Mr. Riel~er was present and stated the balLfield woul. be for community u~e only and hha~ they will abandon this as ~Oon aa another seven acres is ourchased for this ~urpose. Mr. Savage stated that everything ~or~h of Kingscross Roa~ will be abandoned wi~h a~other bkllfield placed south of the tennis courts. There ~as same discussion as tn why the entir~ could not be handled at thi~ time r&th~r than resuh~ission When ~he seven acres az~ obta£ned. Hr. ~eldersen stated the 7 acres After further discussion of the mather, it Wa~ on motion of Mr. ~oekman, seconded by Mr. Daniel, resolved that this request be All out~oor lightin~ shall ~ no higher thaD fifteen fee~ and shall be d~mi~nated so as not to project lj.ght adjacent properties. All outdoor lighting shell be tim~g in accordance wi~h hh~ hours of operation 2. The h~urs of operation shall be limited to ~unday through Thursday from 8:00 a.~. until ~:00 p.m. and Priday through Saturday 8:00 a.m. until 12:00 p.m. 3. One ~ign shall be permitted. This si~n shall not exceed ~k~ee (3} square feet in area and shall not be luminous nor illuminate4. Prior to erection, a ren~eriD~ of the si~n shall be submitted to Development Review for approval. Ali parking areas and driveways shall be a minimu~ Of tar 5. Ther~ Shall be no outside public address system or ~peek~rs. 6. A g~parate and isolated bicycle accessway and ~arkin? asea ~hell be provided for rite s~iu~ing pool. Th~ design and location of this facility shall be approved by Development Review in conjunction with final site plan review. 7. A plan for the buffering of the pool, tennis courts'and parking area shall he ~ubmitted to nevelopment Review for approval in con4unction with final ~ite plan submission. This plag should consist of fencing, bermlng and/or e×isting/new vegetation. These facilities shall be screened ~rom view of any existinq or proposed single ~amily residences. 8. All Parking nnd ~riveway areas shall be located a minimum cf fifteen (15) feet from any e×i~tiag ur proposed public right of-way 9~ A minimum of one (1) ps,kinU space shall be provided for each Sour (4~ p~rSons of pool capacity. (Noh~: Pool capacity i~ based on twelve (I2) p~rso~$ per diving hoard of swimming area, plu~ one [1) person for each ten square feet of wading area.) and four (4] Spaces shall be provided for each tennis court. 10. Thm above conditions nehwithshandln~ ~he plan preQared J, K. Timmons & Associates, %nc., and received F~bruarv 7~ I9~, shall be considered the pla~ ef development. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, ~Ir~. Girone, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Daniel. kbsent; Mr. Dodd. 82-080 the Board with options of opereeing a ~ingle landfill; two landfills in operation simul~aneeuslv~ one landfil~ and one area landfill would decreas~ witk the operation of ~ southern whiuh is filed with the pacers of this Board, did not included regarding competition in the private sector relating to landfills and the costs eX disposal. ~. 5edrick ~tated if two landfills would be twenty year~r but with it operatXng by itself, it would the County is here to s~z~ the people. ~lr. Daniel indicated he stated that the northern area landfill i~ of h~e high%st quality and that the public ~ector do~ not have to provide these standards. Sh~ stated she felt the County should find some midpoint. ~r, Bookman stated the cost of a land~%ll will never be cheaper ~han it currently is. Ee stated that figures p~sented are ~ush estimated and there are ne real true figures. Mr. Bedrick stated the staff ~as presenting concepts ~t this time for th~ Board's information. The ~oard generally agreed that they would meet with the two companies wishing to present prcpomals and that the staff proceed as authorized earlier this d~te. On motion of Mr. Daniel, ~econded by Mrs. Girone, the Board Mr. O'~eill, Mrs. Girths, Mr. ~ook~an and Mr. Daniel. Mr. Do~d. Administrator E. Merlin O'Neill.er.v' Chairman 8~081