Loading...
03-10-1982 Minutes~OARD OF SUPERVISORS ~INUTES March 10, 1982 Supervisors in Attendance: Mr. E. Merlin O'Neill, Sr., ChairMan Mrs. 3eau Girone, Vice Chairman Mr. C. L. Bookman ~. Harry G. Daniel Mr. R. Garland Dodd Mr. Richard L. Nedriek County AdmiuiStrutor staff in Attendance: Construction Coord. Mr. Elmer ~odge, Asst. Co. Admin. ~r. William Howell, Dir~ of General Services Mr. Robert Ma~den, Dir_ of ~uman Services Mr. Steve Micas, Co. Attornev Mr. Jeffrey Minek~, Asst. Co. Attorney Mr. Robert Painter, Dir. Col. Joseph Pit,man, Chie~ of ~olice Mr. Lane Ramuey, Dir_ of Rudq~t and A=counting Mr. George Woodall, bit. of ~¢onemlc Development ~[r. O'Neill oat!ed the meeting t~ order at the Courthouse at Mr. Dodd gave the invocation. Chief Pittman was present and in~roduced Officer M~rk T. Wells. He stat~ Officer Wells had responded to the ~e~ne of an aooi~snt in whick the vehiela was submerged under four feet of wa~r and without regard for his personal safety, he had rescued the victim from the vehicle when other attempts had-failed. Ee stated St. Anne's Knights of Columbu~ had recognized him for his heroic a~tions. The Board e×pr~ssed their guo~ fortune in having Pelic~ officers of Officer Wells' salibar on the force an~ it was on motion cf the Board, resolved thak the relieving re~olu%ion be other attempts had failed~ ~his resolutlon be recorded in the minute book of this Board of as permitted by Section 2.1-344 [a) {6) and (2), respectively, e the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. ~ 1982 unkil April BO, 1982 for 2.8+ mores of land at the On motion of Mrs. Girone, Seconded by 5~r. Daniel, the Board approved the minutes of February 24 ~n~ March 1~ 1982, as mr. Josh Greenwood stated be would like to give the Beard an Update on the repairing of the Battersea Dam. ~s stated that th~ c~noeists were a powerful lobbying group and he had not been successful in having the General Aasemb!y approve reDair~ to the Dam. He stated fhat the canoeists were not inter,stUd in the County saving $20,00Q nor protecting the Dewar line. ~e stated he ~anted to prmserve the historic value of the area as well and that he was not against canoeist~ and their aoti¥ities. He stated that he had been to the State Wate~ Conerol BOard and had the clause changed ~hich w~uld allow him to repair the dam hut there was the possibility of legal action. He sta~ that he had also ~eseived two different opinion~ from two different Attorneys General as to ~he ~agalit} of Proceeding. He stated he intended to try to cooperate as best he uoul~ but he had Purchased a bulldozer and planned to contact the Federal ~nd Commission and others regarding this matter. Hr. Richard Hartman, General Manager of the Appomattox River Water Authority, presented the Board with a reQart on the proposed expansion of the ~×isting water treatment plant from 22 million gallons per day to 46 million galton~ per day. Ke ~tatsd the Board of the Au~horit? ie~ls ~his ~s necessary in or,er ~0 guarantee an adequate supply ~f water for the future. He Stated that th~ state Health Department requlation~ requir~ pIans for plank expansion ~o be underway when 80~ of the plant capacity is reached ~or three consecutive'months or when peak demand exceeds plant capauity. He sta~ed in July, August and September of the production was slightly under ~he 8~ and on four dave plant production exceeded the rate capacity. Ee stated without the expansion by 1985, the Authority will have t~ proportion usage of water to ils customers d~ring o~ak usage times. He Stated this would probably necessitate localities to instltut~ water restrictions and penalties on their customers, lie stated additional residential and industrial customers could not be accepted by localities Unless they have developed an alternative ~ource of their own, He Stated the effect of the expansion will also increase the co~t o~ water to Khe localities served. ~artman reviewe~ consumption, projected demand, design, cost, rates for the expansion and method of financing, etc_ $~-084 Dinwiddie had adopted the re~olutien and Colonial H~ght~ had referred it to their attorney for verbiage changes. Nr. 0'Neil~ inguired if the County staff had reviewed the ~$olution ~n order that at ls in the best interest of the C0untv, Mr. Bedri~k - stated staff had reviewed the proposed resolution. After dlscussicn of the matter, it was ~n motion of the BOard, r~o~ved thm~ the following resolution be adopted: Authority and Chesterfield County" was~made and entered into aS of th~ 9th day of September, 1964~ by and between Appomattox River Water Authority {the "Authority"), and the County of ChesterfieI~ (the "County"); and Agreement and pre~ently maintained and operated by the Authority (the "water Supply System") is not adequate to mast the groining demand ~or filtered ~ater within th~ service ar~a, as such term is defined in the subparagraph entitled "S~RVICE APDA" in Paragraph 5 of the Agreement {the "Service Ar~a")~ and Supply System a~e necessary in or,er to provide an adequate supply cf filtered water ~e the Service Area; and Whereas, such i~%prQve~ents and extenzione will r~qu~re the issuance and gale of Additi~naI Bonds, as referred to in Section 401 of th~ re~olution of the Authority entitled Appomattox River Water Authority" (the "Resolution")~ and Whereas, the County and the Authority desir~ to clarify the such Additional Bonds. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved, that the County hereby an~ agrees %hat the issuance of Additional Bonds i~ necessary in S~pply System required to provide an a~e~uate ~upply of f~ltered water for the me~ber~ of the Authority; and appears in the Agreement, is hereby deSined to have the meaning ~$cribed to it in Section 103(7) o~ th~ ~$olution, and that the ter~ "bond5" shall include any Additional Bonds, as referred tO in Section 401 of the Resolution; and Bonds by the Authority ia in connection ~ith improvements and ~xten$1ons to the Water $~uply System to be made within the Service Ar~a and that said Waker Supply System, as the term is used in the Agreement, ~hall mean said System as extended and improved now or in the future in order to provide an adequate ~upply of ~ii~ered ~ater fe~ the men. ers of the Authority and Otherwis~ in fnr~herane~ cZ the purposes ~f hh~ Authority; and Be I% Further Re~o~ed that the County hereby agr~s and con~ents to the issuance of Addi%ionai ~onds in accordance with introduced ~. Jim ~li~zczynski, Mr. David S~one and ~Iz. Jim ~astsz who were almo present representing Tri-Citiem Recvclinc. Ms. McNinch presented the Board with an Outline o~ frQm Tri-citles. Mr. ~limzczynski stated their ~urpose was eliminste ~he need for landfills in the area and ~o z~claimable resource~ in the form of electricity, steam and eompost~ Hs s~ated the refuse would be processed 82-085 received and explained the shredding, air elreulatiom, separation and eomposting ~y~tem. K~ stated they intend t~ place this facility un e 90 acre parcel located in Prince George and presented a rondering cf the facility. He state~ the pond on the site would be for fire control as well as aesthetics. Be stated there was also a ~rnvisien for an emergency landfill and incineration ShOUld the facility malfunction. He mtated that they will provide free trash disposal to citizens at the site. He stated they would like the Beard to adopt a resolution authorizing the County to enter into negotiations to direct its waste stream to this facility and sign a letter of intent to contract with them in the future. Ms, MeNinch stated that benefits derived to the County and citizens would be that the County would ne longer need to build or operate a landfill; the County would ~o longer need to subsidize a landfill but would actually realize a mrofit from tipping f~s if the County charged $10 per ton as the facility would charge the County $8.50 per ton; approximately 10 jobs would be created in ~rince George County~ it would stabilize and possibl7 reduce hipping fees for ei~issns; the land which would have been utilized for a landfill COuld be put to ~or~ productive uae and it would reduce dependence on foreign sources of euergy. Mr. Gliszczynski stated that they intend to generat~ electric{fy for ~ale to Veuco and build a steam generating facility for Allied Chemical; that %hey anticipate She tipping fee =o remain the same for a three year period and after that time, if an increase Were needed it would be no more than 6% per annum; that the 15 trucks used for h~ullnq the refuae would be rUnning during nonpeak hours; etc. Mr. Gliszszynski also offered to build and operate a transfer ~tation in ~he central area of the County. ~e further stated that his plant would be able to accept the sewage ~ludqe from the County. Mr. Daniel inquired about the cost of the facility. ~r. ~li~zezyn~ki stated that the facility would =cst approximaSely $4~,000,000 and that General Electric will guarantee with bend the operation of the facility. Be stated that the facility is de~gned to kindle the refuse from all ui× localities and that they would be ready to handle refuse within !2-18 months. Mm. 5edrick stated that the two companies ~Tri-C£ties R~cyuling an~ United Biofusls) are co~p~ting against each other, and it seemed that twa suuh facilities could not operate at the ~amo time as they bosh Nant commitments fram the County ~or diversion of the waste strew. M~. Daniel stated this appears to be a monopoly an~ he Was concerned about the public's interest. ~r. Bookman inquired about the financial backing. Mr. StOne stated that they are involved witb responsible groups, each as General Electric, the ~urisdi~tion~, etc. and the expertise is what this is based on rather them financial capital. ~. Dodd stated h~ felt this and the other COmpany's concepts w~re goe~ b~t he was not ready to make any co~/itment at th~ The Board thanked repreeunuativea cf Tri-Cities for their presentation. Mr. Jack Kid.well of United Biofueis was present. He stated that Teledyne International had developed their system. He stated that they have assessed growth and refuse and have determined that only 3% of refu~e needs to be r~turned to landfills after b~ing processed a~ they propose and this refuse will not cause leachers problems. He stated they had a mite of 86 acres and had received approval from the State Water Control Board, EPA, Corps of Engineers, had received zoning anR that E. F. ~{utton was their financial advisor. He stated that they had a soldd contract with Vepco to supply energy produced at this facility. Mr. Kidwell ~tated they ~enld receiv~ all re,use in one building, it would be screened for reusable items, then filtered and th~ remaining would be sent to the boiler. ~e stated they were investigating the aomposting of sludge at this time a~d possibly 82-086 mixing same with wood chips. ~Ie state~ their tipping fe~ would be $9.50. Ho stated they had spent more than Si,D00,000 in engineering, design and assessment of the project. Itc stated that tho first phase to pro~uce 35 megawatts would cost $55,000,000 and if they proceeded with the 55 megawatt facility, it would cost approxim~telv $125,000,000 all of which is for the firmt phase. He stated a similar type operation in Maryland has tad a record of being down only 4 days withim 4 years. He stated it would take approximatalv 30 months C~ have thi~ facility in operation. Mr. Medrick stated that tad proposala pr~ented today were entirely di~formnt from what had been discussed previously, oven the costs. ~e sCa%ed that in order to make a decision on' a matter of this magnitude, tangible and Specific information had to be pre~ented. Mr. O'Neill staked he felt mtaff skeul~ look into th~ financial viability of bo~h systems, cost to the County and citizens, what would happen to the landfill ~ites, afc. He stated that guidelines should ~e establishod which would bar last session on this sub,oct. Mr. ~arshall H. Marcus, Jr., ChRirm~n of t~e Citizens Commit~ of P~inco G~orge, was present. ~e stated that a thorough eva~uatiQn of costs ~hould b~ made and tha~ cn~ out of every four 9UCh faci!ifies fai~ although nons are as complex as Tr~-Cities. Ee contended bhat th~ more ~ompIe× the less chance of He also stated ~hat ~anQvsr County did somsfhing ~i~ilar tc thl~ ~n~ los~ in o~cess of $20,0O~,~00"over a 20 year p~riod and now has another landfill, e~c. ~a stated that ther~ was an by a Maryland based c~mDany te e~era%e a s~milar facility whose rates ware $1~ a ton which proved unsuccessful end now has been taken over by others and operates on a $25 o ton basis. He stated ke felt this typo of operation is *'high risk". Zr. ~arry ~regQri Of th~ Richmond Regional PlanniDg District purposes only and that they encouraged insuring a backup system in case the main system goes The Board thanked Mr. ~idwell for his presentation. On motion of the Bomr~ the week of March 2t-27, 19B2, was declared "United Negro Coll~g~ Fund Week" in Chesterfield COunty. ~r. O'Neill inquired if Mrs. Girone w0ul~ like to serve a~ the currently servo~ on a Board at Virginia State Unlversitv which is soliciting contributions for public collsg~s and this private college fund. It w~s generally agreed the Beard WOuld not appoint a honorary chairman for this fund raising campaign. On motion of the Board, the following r~solution was adup~ed: tho environmental quality of Chesterfield CoUnty thruugh development cf a program ts reduce litter and lktteri~g7 and Whereas, K3C i~ planning a spring clean-up of Chesterfield County. Now, Therefore, B~ It Resolved, that the Chesterfield Countv Board ef Supervisors supports this worthy cause, and so designates April 5 through 18, 1982 as "Keep Chesterfield Clean weeks~ 1982"~ and 82-087 10. 11. Further Be It Resolved that the Bo~rd eno©oregon all residents an~ businesses to particiDete in this ore, ram to make Ckeaterfield County a better place to live and w~rk. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Daniel excused himself from the meeting. ~. Correkl was present and stated Kenbridge Building Systems ha~ submitted a claim in the amount ef $20,597 for delays regarding ~h~ feun~atlon design and e~istlng ground condition~ for the vehicle mainteRance center. Ne stated the contractor has indicated that the expenses incurred a~ a resul~ of the Droblem, the initial delay which was cauge~ and the seasonal effect on work has resulted in an unforeseeable financial hardship smd be had requested $~0,571.$0. He stated there were some unacceptabI~ items in the higher claim and it had be~n ~educed. Mr. Dodd intuited about the foundation. Mr. Correll stated that the architect felt the original plan for the foundation ~as adequate ~nd that i~ was later dste~mined that it was not. Mr. Dodd stated that this area has a high water table and thi~ should hay. been kDown by all concerned. He stated he could agree on the e~tension of time but ~id not feel the County was liable f~ the $90,~97. Mx. Bookman ~uegtioned the length of time neede~ for ts~t borings and the delay this caused. Mrs. Girs~e stated she felt someone should be appointed to intercede on b~half of the County in eases such as thi~ as time and money are being Mr. Correll stated that if the project had not continued, it may have cost the County a~ditienat funds in legal fees. H~ stated this was the bast solution that ~as determined a~ the architect, the engineer and the County were al~ stating it was th~ O~h~rs fault. Mr. Bookman stated that he did not feel the County should bs responsible for the entire $20,597 as another party wa~ £nvolvsd. After further discussion, it was on motion ~f Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Dedd, resolved that the County approve aha request of the contractor for a 57 day ~xtension e~ time from June 4, I9~2 until July ~1, 19S2 but that the clai~ in the amount of $20,597 b~ denied in the manner as pre~nted. Ayes: M~, O'Neill, Mrs. Gircne, 5~. Bookman an~ Mr. Dedd. Absent: Mr. Daniel, On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Beard cf Supervisors her@by requeat~ that the Circuit Court create a peri,neat B~e~d of ~qualization of Real ~stete Assessments in accordance with Section 58-898.1 of tko Cod~ of Virginia. Ayes~ ~r. O'Neill, Mra. Girone, Mr. Bookman and Mr. DodO. On motion of ~r. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the ~oard approved and authorized the County Admini~rat©r to execute necessary documents for the purchase of a 16 foot wide permanent sewer ~as~ment and a variable width :emporary construction easement owned by the Estate of John ~. 5Iark~ and located behind Cloverleaf Mai1 in the amount of $2,OQQ ~hich cost will be berne by the developer. Ayes: Mr. 01Neill~ Mrs. Gircne~ Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dedd. Ab sent~ Hr. Daniel. The Board set the date of March 24, 19~2, at 7~00 9.m. to meet wi~b the Volun=ee= District Fire Chiefs. 12.A. I2,B. 12,6, Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Bookman add ~. Dodd, Absent: ~. Daniel_ On m~tion of Mrs. Girone, s~conded by Mr. Bookman, the Board re&ppointed the following p~©ple to the Co--unity Services B©ard representing the distri~ as indicated and who~e"terms are effective immediately end will expire on Dec~er 31~ 1984: 1. Mrm. Ann Stubblefield, Clover Hill Z. Mr. Richard Spencer[ Midlothlan Aye~ Mr. O'Neill~ Mrs. Girene, Mr. Bookman and Nr. Dedd. Absent: ~ir. Daniel. ~!r. O'Neill stated he ha~ receive~ a lstt~r from a Connty r~$ide~t in s~ppor~ of the ~lental Health Clinic requesting also that this proqram not be eliminated from the budqet. On motion of Mr. Dedd, seconded ~y ~r. Bookman, th~ Hoard accepted th~ r~s~gnatiQns of ~r. C. ~. wilkes and Mr. Robert Allen, both rm~reeentinq Bermuda District, from the Con~niEy Serviee~ On motion of Mr_ Bookman, seconded by ~rs. Girone, the Board a~opted the fcllewinq ~esolutlon: Whereas, The Code of Virginia authorizes the Bear~ of Supervisors to ~esiqnate the number of members constituting the Community Sefvlces Board which shall be not less than five nor nors than 15 Whereas, Th~ Board currently established at 15 members but 0nly nine positions are presently filled~ an~ Wherea~, Th~ Community Services Roard im a Dolicv ~oard having broad responsibilities for the operRtion of the ~ental Health/Mental Retardation cemter~ a compact and close working Board is essential to an effective and ~ffici~nt operation; and ~ime-consumlng. ~ow, Therefore~ Be It Resolved by the Boar~ of Supervisors D~ Chester~ie!d County that tbs Con~unity Services Boa~d shall hereafter c~nslst of 10 ms.ers. Those members curzenttv in mffice shall Continue in office f~r the t~rm to which they were ~ppoint~d. As soon az practical thereafter, representation un the Board shall consist of two ms~er~ from ~ach magisterial ~intrie~. And Be It Put=her Resolved, that in recognition Jf the ~a~anding nature of service on thin ~oa~d, ~ffective July !, 19~2, each member shall receive a per die~ of Se0_D0 for each Dr pert the~ee~ for attendance at efficial Board meeting~ not to 13.A. 14.A. 14.B.J.. exceed $600.00 in a~y one fiscal year. In addition, each m~n~er incurred in attending ~a~alngs under ~ke ~ams policy used for reimbursing County emploveom. Ayes: Mr, O'Neill, Mtg. Girone, Hr. Book. an and M~. Dodd. The Board requested that the appointmants/resi~nati©n~, etc. be sus~arizad an~ presented at the next ~eeting £~r action needed. ~ik~ of tka Youtk 8ervicnm CommissiOn is suqges~ed. ~e stated that the propose! is to reduce the membership to 10 which include~ five adultm mud fi~e youth. Mrs~ Girone suggested that there be ~sven adults which wOUld eliminate any tie votes and would give th~ adults more representation. She stmtad the two additional me~bers could be appointed from the County at-large. ~r. $oekman suqqeated that there be two adults apDointsd from eack magisterial district. A£t~r further discussion it was ~enerally agreed that staff shoul~ look further into the size of 6he oo~ittee and report back to the Board~ On motion of Mr. De~a~ secsndmd by Mr. Bookman, the Board increased Planne~ ~udWet ~evanua account 220-1 40001-D706 maes by $6,087.50 end increased Planned Budge% ~xpendlture account 220-1-~001-ia01 Part-lima S~laries and Wa~ by $6,0~7.~0. Ayes: Mr, O'~eilI, .~s. Girone~ Mr. Bookman and Mr Dodd. Absent; Mr. Daniel. On motion o~ Mr. Dude, m~monded by ~Lr. Book~an, t~e Board aDproved bingo and/or raffle permits for the follewinq organizations for calendar year 1982: 1. Benslev Voluntee~ Pare Department 2_ Cre~twood ~Iementary ~hool 3. American Ammociation of University Women~ Inc. Ayes: Mr. O~Neill, Mrs. Girone~ Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. M~. Painter introduced Mr. Ken Brammer who had rccently his Professional ~nginaer$ ~×am. The Board con~ratulahe~ ~r. Brara?,ar upon thi~ accomplishment. approved and authorized %h~ County A~ministrator to m×ecute any necessary documents for Contract W81-180/6(8}2181 to Virginia Utilities, Inc. who ~ubmitted ~he %ow bid cf $3,657,70 for in=talla~ion of water line~ on General Boulevard based on Alter~ate "B'~ using P.V.C. pipe an~ f~rther the Board appropriated $4,023.47 from 563 Surplus te 380-1-62~8!-4393 which includes a 101 contingency. Ayes: Mr. O~Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. ~ookman and M~. ~odd. kbsen%: ~r. Daniel. on motion of Mr. DO~, seconded by Mr, Book. an, the Bourd autholized ~he County AttOrney to institute condemnation proceeding~ against the following ~ropertv owners if the amount am set opposit~ their na~m is not accemted. And be it further resolved that the County Administrator ~otify said property owners by cer~ifled mail of ~he intention of ~he County to enter Upon and taka the property which is to be the subjec~ ~f said B2-090 Iq.B,2, 14.C.1. 14,C,4. condemnation proceedings. An emergency existing, this r~solubio~ shall be and it hereby i~ declared in full force and effect ~ne~ G. Pas!awned WB1-45B Billy ~. & Joyce A. Sink WBt-45B Russell B & Peggy C. Winn WBl=45B 5~ry ~. ~veeks UBi-45B $325.00 50.00 Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, ~rs. Girnna, Mr. Book~&~ an~ Mr. Dodd. On motion o~ Mrm. Girone, seconded by Mr. Booknan, the ~oar~ deferred consideration to purchase proDert? located adjacent to the Ettrick Fire Station until a later date. On motion of Mr_ Beo'<~an, seconded bv ~r. D~dd, thc 9oar~ approved ~nd authorized the County A~ministrator to execute any necessary documents for the fullowinq water contra=t~ W$2-24CD/6($)2242 - Duff'e Restaurant beve!oper= Fairlane-Litch~iald Corporation Contractor: 9~ard & Stencil, Inc. Total Contract Cost: $t9~430.00 Estimated Contract Cost~ $3,797.2~ Cash refund for overeiz~ Estimated Developer Cost~ $15,632.72 An~ furtkex the Board transferred $4,000 from 3S~-1-62000-721~ to 380-1-62242=7212 which includ~ $10~.7~ for contingencies. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Eook~an and ~ Absent: ~r. Daniel. On motion of ~r. Booknan, seconded by Mr. DodO, the Board approved and authorized the County A~minietfator to execute any necessary documgn~g for Contract w~l-4~B/~(S}1457 to Central Builders, Inc. who submitted the low bid of $196,53~.G5 based on Alternate A-1 using ductile iron pips with welded bosses for the line which is being installed along Jefferson Davis ~ighway. It i~ nQte~ Chat appropriations are not necessary for this project sines appropriations were made under the Capital IP, provement budget and that the 24" gate valves ~or this project will be furniehed from the Utility's Central Stores. Ayes~ Mr. O'Neill, ~lrs. Girone, Mr. Bookman ~nd ~=. Dodd. Absent: Mr. Daniel. On motion cf ~ Book~en, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approved and authorized the CoUnty Adminiutrator to a×scute any necessary documents for CoD~ract W~2=PB/6(8}20~7, Aeymst Road and willis Read, to Ctamie E. Lyttle Co., Incl who ~ubmitted the 1OW bid in the amOUnt Of $!~2,751.75 base~ on alter~ata A usin~ ductile iron pipe and further the Board transferred $166,33~.2~ from 3S0-1-61457-4393 tO 3~0-1-62097-439~ which includes contingency and it is noted that the 15" gate valves are to be furnished from Utility~s Central Stores. g2-ogl 14.C,6. 14.C.8. 14,C,3, Ayes: Mr, O'Neill~ Mrs. Girone, Mr. ~eokman and Mr. uodd. Absent: Mr. Daniel, 0~ ~otio~ Of Hr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Dedd, the Board appropriated $200 from 563 Surplus to 3S0-1~62121-41Q1 to cover the right-of-way charges until the project is awarded and funds appropriated for Water Contract W~i-12C~ Ream~ Road, Ayes: Mr. O'neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. Absent: H~. Daniel. On motion of Nr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. DodO, the Board approved and authorized the County Administrator to eXeCute any necessary doctt~ents for the following ~ew~r con[tact: S82-SCD/7(BJ2082 - Ki.~rly Acres, Section 3 nevelop~r= Oaklm Incorpor~te~ Cnntractor~ R.M.C. C©ntractors~ Inc. Estimated Total Contrac= COSt= $28,8t7.5Q Est{mate~ Count~ Cost: $599.5Q - Refund ThrOUgh Connection Estimated Developer Cost: $~7,21~.00 Code: ~74-1-11751-7221 }yes: Hr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Book, an and ~lr. Dodd. Absent: Hr. Daniel. On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr_ B~dd, tho ~oard appraved and authorizes the County Administrator to e×ecute any necessary documents ~or the following sewer contract: S82-11CD/7{8)2112, Ground ~ound Restaurant~ Rout~ 60 Developer: Ola S. Allen Contractor: R. R. Snipes Construction CO.~ Inc. Estimated County Co~t~ ~3,686.00 ~ Refund through Estimated Developer Co~t: $16,126.g0 Code: 57~-t-11781-7221 Ayes: ~r. O'Nei~t, Mrs. or,one, Mr. ~ook~an and ~r. Dodd, Absent: Mr. Daniel. On motion of ~r. Bookman, ~econded by Mr. Oodd, the Board approve~ and authorized execute an annusl lease agreement for a water pump station site on ~he property along River Road of Vernon Bishop ~cr O'Neill, Hrs. Girons, ~r. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. ~r. Daniel. Mr. Painter stated Mr. Bruce K~nner would like to address the Board regarding a misunderstanding of his bid for W~1-45~/6(8}14~7. The Board inquire~ ii the County Attorney wau satisfied with the reco~.endation ef staff as to t~ awarding of the contract. Mr, Pain,er stated he was. It was generally agreed that the Board woul~ ~et address this issue. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dedd, the Board apDrove~ and authorize~ the County Admi-istrator to execute any necessary documents for ~81-45B/6(8)14~7, to Amsted Industries, Inc., ~riffin Pipe PrOducts Commany Division, 9iho submlt%ed the low bid of $230,170.22 based on welded bosses. It is noted appropriations are not necessary at this time ma appropriations were made in the Capital Imurovement~ b~dget. 82-092 ~yes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Cirone, Mr, Bo©k~&h and ~r. Dodd. C0sent: Mr, Daniel. tr. Painter presented the ~oard with a report of kh~ Swift Creek la,etched Con~ittee and e report On the developer water end rower ~ontracts executed by the County Adminis%mator. Er. Ramsey pr~s~nqed the Bcurd with information on the proposed 982~83 budget, He stated that %here had been some diSCUSSion egarding setting a date to present hhe ~udget to the Board in a u~ic session. It was generally agreed tha~ the Board would not ~e~t for an©~her work sea,ion and that hhe budge~ beefing would scheduled for March 3~ 1982. . John ~mith was present and wlbhed ho donat~ .~ acres of a ilo of land along Coalfield Koad to the County for a ed~strlan-type pathway subject to certain conditions. Mrs. irene ~tated that staff has no% b~n involved in this donation nd she would prefer not ho accept it until a report has been adc regarding this donation. ~[r. ~mith stated a decision had to ma~e by March 12 and the matter could not be deferred. Mrs. irene indicated thc County's appreciation to Mr. Smith but tat~ this could not be addressed at this time. ~convening: motion e~ Mr. Doddz seconded by ~4rs. Qirone, the Board djourn~d a% ~:00 ~.m. un~il 1O:Og a.m. on ~4arch ~4, 1982. kchard 'L. ~'edrick purity Administrator E M~rlin O'Neill, Si ~ -- Chairmen