Loading...
03-24-1982 Minutes~[arch 24, 1982 ~upervisQrs in Attendance: Mr, E, ~rlin O'Neill, Sr., Chairman Mrs. Joan Girone, Vice Chairmas Mr. C. L. Bookman' Mr. ~arry G. Daniel Mr. R. Garland Dodd Mr. Richard L. Hedrick Co~ty Ad~inJ. strator Staff in Attendance: Mr. Stanley Raldersen, Dir. of Plannin~ Ms. Anita Bradshaw, Youth Services Coordinator Asst. to CO. Admin. Chief R. L. ~enes, Jr.~ Mr. Phil ~ester, 9ir. of Hr. Elmer ~odge, Asst. CO. Administrator Mr. ~illia~ Eewell, Dir. Mr~ Robert Rasden, Dir. ~r. Jaf£reV Muzzy, Dir. Mr. Robert Painter, Dir. of Utilities Mr. Dexter Williams, Chief of Trans. Plan. of M~ntal Kealth/~enta~ O'Neill called the meeting to order at the Courthouse at 1Q~05 a.m. (EST). ~.r, Bookman gave ~he invocation. aDprcved the minutes of March 10, t9~2, as amended. Vote: Unanimo6s Chief Eanes was present and briefly reuorte~ on the fire in P~t~rsburg on ~arch 20, 19~2, indicating that COunty D~rsonnet and ~qulpment had r~ponded to ~he situation. Mr. Daniel stated hu had hear~ that ~tersburg had loot memo euuipment durin~ this fire. ¢hie~ Eenes orated that the}, had lost a pumper and ~cv~ral ground ladders. ~e stata~ further that th~ County had offere~ to It wa~ generally agreed that pren~uta~ions to the Volunteer District Chiefs ~outd be ~efe~red until later in the day. ~s. ~radshaw introduced Mr. Bill George with the Y.~.C.A. Mr. George stated this was the ~i×th year for the ~ode! Government Da~ and that ~t had been a very s~cee~fuI progrnm in the ~est. ~u introduce~ the teachers ~nd s~udents involve~ in th~ Dr~gram. The Beard ~tated it ~as rewarding to see students tak~ inter,st in their qovernmentby participating in this program. Mr. George s~ated Model Government Day would be on Hay 6th and invited the' Board's Participation. n motion of the Board~ the followiny reso%utlon wam adopted: Whereasw The South Richmond-Chesterfield ¥.M.C.A. is )rganizing a day to allow high school student~ to participate in their Count? government; and Whereas~ These students shall be selected to represent their schools in portrayin~ the relms of County officials ~n the 6th day of May~ 1982; and Whereas, The Chesterfield Ceuntv seard 0£ Supervisors recognizes the importance of young people having opportuntles to learn about their ~ove~nment, in order for them to become responsible citizens. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved by the Chesterfield County Soard of Sup~rvisorgz that tko 5th day of May, 1982, be d~clnred Rich~ond-Chestsrfield Y.~.C.A. a~d that this observance be called ~o th~ attention of all citizens. ~otc: Unanimous Kr. Hedrick stated this date and time had been advertised for a 0nblio hearing to consider an ordinan¢~ to ahead the Code of the ionntv 0~ Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, by adding Section 20-27.1 and amending Sections 26-~7 and 2D~32 re~atlnq tO sewer =onneo~ion charges and extension charges for sewer lines. He stated consideration of thi~ ordinance had been deferred ~rom ?ebruary 24, 1982 at the request of the home buildurs to allow them time to discuss th~ matter further. Mr. Charles Ouaiff, Fup~rintendene o% Accounts and Records for the Utilities Department, stated that ~he home builders had proposed a revision ~o the ordinance as ~ubmittmd to the Board. Re statmd the primary differmnce in the proposal is that connection fees are increased gradually each y~ar rather than the originally ~ingle stmp increasm~ ~e s~ated the dimadvanta~es of their ~roposal are that $360,000 lesm in revenue will be collected the first year and that there is some concern regarding oublic ~eaction to the steadily increasing rat~ which could result in ~tated that an advantage of the proposal is that it will match :he growth of the sewer systsm and re~uce the initial impact on nhoss buying homes in the County_ Mr. ~edrick ~tated that the ~ome builders, which inolu~e other menthols of the profession such ~s developerew etc., were aisc contacted rsgardinq this matter. kstocia%ion of Kictunond, stated that the Association appreciated :he opportunity of worklnq with the Department of Utilities in teveioping the proposed ~ha~ges in fewer connection fees. HQ ~tated it is recognized ghat user fees aaa and will provide the ~undlng necessary for ~ewage treatment to promote the continuing lro~th of Chesterfield County. ~e stated if the Count? were to ~dequate funding ~or the timely improvements n~eessary for plant ~o stated in order to safeguard the funding provided by this lmendment, his association requests that the ~oard incorporate nrc the min~tes of this meeting that a~ annual audit be made of :h~ connection fees collected and mscuowed within sewe~ funds in m interest bearing account. He stated these funds should be ~sed exclusively for additional sewer treatment capaoit? and e stated this audit shoul~ repert th~ number of connections times the oannectlen fee to establish the gross funds available, zhe actual e×pendlturss for plant e~anSien, the actual refunds ko developers, the interest earned o~ eke available funds, ~nd comparison of the actual connections to the ~onnections. He stated if a differeDoe OCCUrs in'either the ~umber of connections applied for er the number of connections ~rejected, therefore creating a significant difference J.n funds [or plant e×pansio~, a~ immediate study should be made to adjust ~onnaction fees. {e stated further that they would not like tG see a moratorium in :hs County for sewer and that this proposal will work. .~r. Bookman vested he felt 60% of the cost of the project was too high and that connection fees should be $1,500. He stated there is not ~ higher charge incorporated into this ordinance for those ~ho do net connect witkin %he allowed :im~ for ~he lower rate. Mr, Micas state~ that the e~tension charge is the trade off. Mr. 5ookman etatsd he felt there would be problems ~hen estimating a project and informing people ~hat the co~t would be, only to receive e higher actual cost and the east to reeident~ w~uld increase. Mr. Quaiff stated that the proposal insures that the cost will be no higher than the estimate to reeidents and if the actual cast of the project is le~, the cost will be reduced to residents. ~r. Dedd inquiwsd abeut payback charges. Mr. Ouaiff s~ate~ there ~ould not be any change in that portiom cf fha ordinance. ~i~one stated she f~lt this was a way to relay cost to existing humeowners of the project. Mr. Quaif~ stated that the ordinance ~ilt require the owners of vacant lots and residences to pay ~heir share ~gually. Mr. Daniel stated he has recently found that another ~ubdlvlsien in his area has contracts fat's lesser ~mount and that with such high rates, this will cause ~eiqhborhood animesity between two areas which could be paying ~%~o entirely d±ffe~ent charges. ~ s~a~ed the cost could prevent anyone from sQnnacting. ~e mta~ed he could a~ee with the $1,tQQ 5r 40% of the cost now and Qossibly ~0% next year, but he felt approve the 60% at thie time wes too much. Mr. O'Neill stated that projects with contracts will have ~o bM handled on an individual basis. Mr. Bookman stated the Health Department has indicated there ar~ not that many preblems in the County but he 5id net agree. Mr. O~Neill erased there is no obligation on the ~art cf the Ceuntv to exten~ sewer to e~imting subdivisions. ~cokman stated that he felt the BOard wa~ obligated to extend ~ewer to certain steam which was covered under a previous hand ~uch a~ Reck spring Farm. Mrs. girone stated she did not feel :he system should subsidize the individual home and that this ~ould balance the system and Save mens? for future treatment ~lants. ~r. Dodd stated something needed to be done as monthly mills ara becoming too high. ~-h-. Rookm~n stated he did not ~ith psrcentaq~s because a home which wms built on reck will cost lore to ~ewer th~n one that is not a~ he felt the same ~hould be charged to all reeidences. ~rs. Girone ~tated that the ~omsowners ~ill benefit from the service and inquired why the ~vstem ~hould make up the difference. Mr. Bookman $~atsd that :his will address only 100+ homes annually and he could ~nderstand the why th~ Board ~euld not wa{t td approve it if 82-096 ir. Wmtchons stated the average cozt per unit to ~onn¢ct in a ~ub~ivision cf approximately 25 or more homes is abort ~5,100-4,000 which means ~he cost to the resident would be about ~2,460 for the highest cost as proposed at the 60% rate. Mr. ~adrick stated there have been instances when the cost has b~en ~s high as $8,000 for a connection for an indivfduaI extension. %fber further discussion Of this matter, i~ was on motion of ~. ~aniel, seconded bv Mr. Dodd, resolved that fhis ordinanc~ be ~eferred until April 28, 19~2 at tO;00 a,m. with a work session :o be held on April 14, 1982. Vote: Unanimous Chief Eanem introduced pa~t District Volunteer Fire Chiefs J. V. Cal~$pie, C. L. Mosby and E. C. Reckley. On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopt~d~ Whereas, District Chief J. V. Galaepie relinculshed th~ position of District Chief of Company No. 11, Dale, Deee~er 31, 197I, after serving in that capacity from January, 196~ and Whereas, Chief GalasDie has freely qiv%m of his time =ince joining the Department ~s a charter member of the Dale Fife Company in 1954 and later served a9 President and as a member of the Board of Direotors~ and ~her~a$, It is the desire of this Beard to recognize hfs faithful service to the Chesterfield Firs Department and to ~pre~d this recognition upon the Minute Book of the Board of Supervisors Of Chesterfield County. NOW, Therefore, Be It Resolved that thi~ Board publicly r~ognizes the long an~ distinguished service of District Chief J. V. Galaspie and this Board extends on behalf of its members and the eltiz~ns of Chesterfield County, their aODreciution for the twenty-seven (27) years of service to the County. Vote: Unanimous The Board presented Chief Galaspie with the resolution and an honorary b~dgs from the County. Qn motion of the Board~ 9he following resolution was adopted: Whereas, District Chief C. L. Mosby relinquished the position of District Chief of Company No. 5, MX~lothisn, December 31, 1980 after serving in that caoaolty from January 1, 1980; and I'~ereas, Chief Kosby has freely given of hi~ time since jeining the Department in 1957 an~ served in the rank of 5ieutenant, Cauta~n and Assistant District Chief; and Whereas, Chief Mosby recefv~d the Chesterfield ~ire Oepartment Firefighter of the Year Award ~nd a special life ~avlng award from Company No. 5 in 1975; and Whereas, Chief Mosby is a~ a~credited State Fir~ Instructor, ~erican Red Cross Instructor and CPa %~stru0tor; ~nd ~hereas, It is th~ ~Eire of this Board to recognize his ~aithful service fo the Chesterfield Fire D~partment and to ~Dread this recognition upon the Minute Book Of the ~oard of ~uDervieors of Chesterfield County. $2-~]97 recoqnizes th~ long and distinguished service of District Chief C. L. ~osby and this Board extends on behalf of its me~er~ and the citizens of Chesterfield CountY, their appreciation for the twentv-four (24~ years of servie~ to the County. Vote: Unanimous The Board presented Chief M~by with the resolution and an honerary badge frum ~he County. On motion of the ~oard, the followinq resolution wac adopted: Whereas, District Chief E. C. Reckley recently relineuishe~ ~he D0sition uf District Chief of Company Nc. 3, B~n~ley~ after se~vlng in that capacity fro~ January 1967 through Dece~r 197~ and again fram January 1976 through December 1950; and ~ereas~ Chief Retklev has freelv given of his time since joinln~ the Department in 1~50 and ~e~ved in various ranks an4 mositions, including Assistant Chief, Secretary and Member ~f the Whereas, It is the desire of this Beard to recognize his faithful service to th~ Chesterfield Fire Department and to spread this recognition upon the Minute Book of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County. Now, Therefore, Be It Keselved that thi~ Board publicly recognizes the long and distinguished service of District Chief ~. C. R~ckl~y and this ~eard extends cn behalf of its me-bars and th~ citizen~ o~ Chesterfield Countv, their apureciation for the thirty-uae (31) years of service to the County. Vote: Unanimous The ~oard pre,eared Chief Reckley with the resolution and an honorary badge from the County. Chief Eanes mte~e~ three Chiefs wh~ could not attend the meeting today were Chief Warren I. Cu~ningham, Chief Garland E. Heath and Chief Robert ~, Kannedy. On motion Of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: Whereas, D/strict Chief Warren I. Cunningham recunt!v relinquished th~ position of District Chief of Company NO. ~ncn, after esrvlng in that capacity from 196~ through 1981; and whereas, Chief Cunningham has freely given of hie time since ~oin~ng the Department ].n !94~ and served in various ranks including Aseistant Chief and CapLai~; and Whereas, It is the desire of this Be~¥d to recegnize his faithful ~ervice to the Chesterfield Fire Departmen% and to spread this recognition upon thm Minute ~cok ef the Board of Supgrvi~ors of Chesterfie]~ County. NOW, Therefore, Be It Reeolved that this Board publioiv recognizes the long and distinguished service of District C~ief Warren I. Cunninqham and this Board extends on behalf of members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, their apurecietlon for thirty-two ~32} years of service ~o the Countv. Vote: Unanimous 82-098 On motion of the Board, the followin~ re~oluti©n was adopted: ~hereas, District chief Garland E. ~eath relinquished the ~osition of District Chief of Company No. 2, ~Iench~t~r, D~ce~mbsl 31, 1979 after serving in that Capacity from January, 1974~ and Whereas, Chief Heath has freely given of his time ~ince jeinin~ khe Department in 1967 and later served in various positions, including Engineer, Lieuteuant, Captain and Assistan~ Chief; and ~5~er~as, It iS the desire of this Board to recognize his faithful service to the Chesterfield Pire Department and to S~pervisors of Chesterfield County. Now, Therefore, Be It R~ol~ed that ~his Board publicly recognizes the long an~ distinguished service of Di~t~ict Chief Garland E. Heath and this Board e×%ends on behalf of it~ members an~ the citizens of Chesterfield County, their appreciation for the fourteen (14) veara of service to the County. VoTe: Unanimous On ~e~ion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: Whereas, District Chief Robert N. Kennedy relinquished the position of District Chief of Company No. 7, Clover Hill, in 1~80 after &crying in that capacity from Januarv, 1978; and Whereas, Chief.Kennedy has given freely Of his time since joining the Department in 197~ and cempleted many Fire Department courses including the Firemanskip Series, Officer Development~ CPa and Em~rqency Vehicle Operator's Course; and Whmreas, It is the d~slre of this Board to recognize his faithful s~rvice to the Chesterfield Fire ~epar~ment and to Spread this recognition upon the Minute Book of the Board O~ Supervisnr~ of Chesterfield C~unty. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved ghat this Scard publicly recognizes the distin~ulshed service of District Chimf Robert M. Kenneoy and this Board extends on behalf of its members and th~ citizens of Chesterfield County, their appreciation for the six I6) years of service to the County. vote: Unanimous The Board expressed their appreciation for the service r~nd~red to %he County by the Chief~ who were mresent and Drem~nted Chief Eane$ with the resolutions and badges for Chiefs Cunninqham, ~eatk and Kennedy and requested ~hak they he presented to them J.r appreciation for their service to the County. Chief ~anes recognized Mrs. Chri~ Reokley who was also present and stated that without the support of the wives and families of the volunteer~, tSe systsm would not be successful. ~. O'Neill addressed the ~tudents wh~ were present at the meeting end indicated if they felt a desire to help ~he County, the Fire De~artment~ in their localities would be glad to aeoe~t applic~tlcns for volunteers. ~r, Hedrick ~tated tha~ this date and time had bean advertised for $ public hearing to consider an ordinance relating to ~angible personal propsr~v tax ~xemDtion for certain farm animals. There was no one pre~ent to discuss this ma~ter. On motion of Mrs. Circus, seconded by ~1r. Bookman, the Board adopted the fol~owlng ordinance: b) c) d) e) An Ordinanc~ to 7u~end Chaoter 8, Article II, of the Code of the County"c£ Chesterfield, 1978, as Amended, to Add Section Relating to Tangible Personal Property Tax Exemption for Certain Farm Animals B~ It Ordained by the B~ard. of Supervisors ef the County of Chesterfield: 1) That Chapter S, krticlo II, of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978~ as amended, i~ amended by adding the following section: Article II Tangible Personal Property Taxes Se~c. S-14.2. Same--Farm animals, certain grains, agricultural products, farm machinery, farm imD].e~ents and equipment. The following farm animals, grains~ feeds, agricultural products, farm ~achi~ezy and farm implements shall COnstitute Separate classes of tangible personal prouertv and shall be exempt from taxation as tangible parsonal'pro~erty: a} Horses, mules and ether kindred animals; provided, however, that horses, mules and oth~r kindred animals used in son,unction ~gth riding eeheels, academies or similar establishments, fe~ edunational o~ recreation ~u~Doses, shall not be included in %his claes. Cattle. Sheep and Hogs. Poultry. Grains and ether feeds used for the nurture of farm Grain, t~bacco and other sgzicultural products in the hand~ of a producer. h) Farm nachinery and farm implements; provided, howe,,e~, that thio class of property shall ~ot include motor vehict~s Ot~er~Js~ classified separately in Section 5~-~R9, Code 0£ Virginia, 1950, as ~ended. i) Equio~n~ used by farmers or farm cooper&tires cualifying under Section 521 of the Internal Revenue Code to manufacture industrial ethanol; provided, however, that th~ materials from which the ethanol i~ derive~ consist primarily of %arm products. Vnte; U~anlmou~ Mr. Cronin stated that Chesterfield Cable Communications had requested a modification to their channel lineup. We stated that C-SPAN, coverage of the U. S. ~o~ee of R~presentative$, will cea~ progran~nlng on the USA Network on March ~l an~ in order to continue prnviding this pr©gra~minc, channel space ne~ds to be made available. ~e stated that Chesterfield Cable im requesting that C-SPAN coY%rage b~ moved from Channel 13, USA Network, to Channel 30, Fine Arts. ~ stated that currently the Fine Arts channel carrie~ mostly digital information concerning public librar}~ services. He stated that locally orginated ~ine arts programming such as dramas and musicals will b~ carried on Channel 3. After further discussion of the matter, it was on motion of Mrs. Girone~ ~econded by Mr. Bookman, re~olved that 82=100 lO.A.& this request ba approved with the understanding that Chust~rfield County reserves the right to return fine arts programming to the Fine Arts channel should d~mand warrant the need for additional channel space. Vote: 9nanimous On motion of Nfs. Girona, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board ~st the date of April 28~ 1982 at 10:00 a.m. for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the Code of the County of chesterfield, 1978, aa amended, by amendiu~ Section ~9-18 rslating tO the m~rking of for-hire v~hicles and providing for a penalty. Vote: Unanimous Mr. John Boykin stated that federal grants ar~ availabl~ to ~und energy au~it~ for heating, a~r conditioning .and liqhting systems. He stated that if the County applies and receives the funding, the matching funds would not exceed $S,~09 and this amount can be absorbed in the Euildings an~ Grounds t982-~3 bu~et. Mrs. Giron~ stated she felt eneruy audits are effective. On motion of ~r. Boo~an~ seconded by Mrs. Giron~ the Board approved a~d authorized the County Administrator to apply and accept funds, if approved, from the Department o¢ ~Derqy, for $ grant for ~n energy audit sf County buildings. On motion of Mr. Dedd, seconded by ~. ~eokman, ~he Board authorized a loan in the amount of S175,000 from Fund 559 Water Construction and Meter Installation F~nd to ~und 76~ Water Central Stores ~o be repaid as the inventory i~ i~sued to the Mr. %~nne in~roduced Mr. G. E. Bishop, President of th% Chester Civitan Club. }~r. Eishop stated the Club would llks to construct an a~ition~l residential cabin at Ca~p Eaker which woul~ b~ approximately 24' x ~0'. H~ stated it will havn access wheelchairs and will bo d~igned for all weather uss. ~e that th~ Club inten~s to ~e most of the construction and hopefully it would be ready for use in June, ]PRZ, ~e s~a~ed the cost of the building will be between $12,0Q~-15,000. He requested that the Board waiv~ any building pe~i% fees involved with this construction. Yr. Micas indicated the Board ceuld not waive the fee~ but could ~ake a donation An the amoun~ of fe~s. O~ m~tlon of Mr. ~ookman, seconded by Mrs. ~irone~ the ~oard approved the COnstruction of ~n additional residential cabin at Camp Baker bv the Chester Civitan Club, accepted the donation of the facility and authorized the County Administrator to make a d©na%ion on behalf of the County in the ~mount of the fees required by th~ County for this construction. Mr. Dodd excused himself from the meeting. Mr. ~cster stated that lease agreement~ fur the Huguenot Little Leagu~ at the Robious Athletic Complex and tho CheSterfield saseball Clubs, Inc. at Rockwood Park were renewals and the sams as currently e×ist. M/. O~eill incnired if the CBC had worked out the problems ~ith the ~a~ro~,.gate Athletic Association. Mr. 82-10t .LO.C. il.E. [~ster Stated he did not think the ~oblems had been solved but that the problems ara internal between the two orqanizations and the bylaws involved. Mr. O'neill stated that he aid net feel it proper to qive this leaoe ho the CBC if they could not solve 5heir internal problems. After further discussion, it was on action o~ Mrs. Girone, Seconded by ~%r. Bookman, resolved that the Board aporeved and authorized the County Administrator to execute ~ny necessary documents ~or the le~se a~reement for the ~uquenot tittle 5ea~u~ for ope~at£on of the=oncmss~on~ facility at Robious ~thletic Ccmple× and for the lease agreement for the Chesterfield Ba~ebaI1 Clubs, %nc. %or the operation of %ha concession facility at goekwood Park. ' Ayes: ~frs. Girone, ~r. Bookman and Mr. Daniel. ~-bstention: P~r_ O'Neill. Zr. Dodd ret~r~ed to the meebing. !~r. Hasher or~sented ~he Board with a fe~s and char~es policy s~eci~I parks and recreation ~e~vices and facilities. H~ the inpositlon of tkese fees will make possible the continued ~peration of Dasic ~ervic~s whil~ allowing other special classes, ~rograms and ~ci%itiss on a pay es you go bsoi~, The Board ~equested a cop? Of the f~e schedules. On motion of Mr. Bookman~ ~econded by M~s. Girone, the Board approved the fees and charges ~olicy ~or special pa~ks and recreation sarvice~ and ~ copy of which is filed with the papers of this Beard and also nada a part of the Administrative Procedures Manual, 4r. Hedrick advised the ~oard of OUtstanding appointments. ~n motion of Mrs. Gi~on~, seconded by Mr. Book~gn, tko Board ~therlzed the following changes te the Countv'g membership on ~he Richmond Metropolitan Plannin~ OrganizatiOn: ~tanley ~. Balderson, Jr, - Voting Member )exter R. William~ - Ue~in~ Member ~ames P. Zoek - Alternah~ rohn R. Marling - Alternate ~effrey B. ~uzzy - Alternat~ ir. C. L. Bo©kmart and Mrs. Joan Girone tO r~main as the elected ~preoentatlves. )n motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by ~rs. Giro~e~ the Board doph~d the fei%owing resolution: ~'~ereas, the Board of Supervisors ~stabl~ohed in 197~, ~ o~th Services Commission with a marshalship of 15 adulh~ mud 6 oung p~ople, for a ~ota% of 21 members, who~e term bv tradition ~pireo in October; an~ ~ereag, each adu%~ Coaunission me~ber is to serv~ a ~hree ear ~erm an~ each youth m~r is tO serve a on~ year term, with nlimited reappoin~men~; an~ Whereas~ %he Commission currently has 19 mem~bers, but has eon unable to maintain ~ high level of attendance and Lnvolv~ment; and 82-102 development~ and membership o£ 15. Those m~bers currently in office shall Vote: Unanimous On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board approved a livestock claim in the amount of $572 for ~{r. Reverly Reams whose heifer cow was killed by unknown doqs. This day the County ~nvironm~ntal ~ngineer, in accordance with directions from thi~ Board, made report in writinq upon his examination of Jessup Road, Ballmark Brive, ~al!mark Court, ~allmark Circle, Rallm~rk Terrace and Brambleton Road in Lake ~arms, S~ctiun A, Dale District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of hr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Gironu, it is resolved that Jessnp ROad, Hallmark Drive, ~atlmark Court, Hallmark Circle, ~allmark Terrac~ and Era~leton Road in Lake Farms, Sectiom A, Dale District; be and they h~raby are established as DeLtic roads. And be it further r~olved, thmt the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation, be and i~ herebv is reouested to take into the Secondary System~ Jessup Road,'heg~nn~ng where State maintenance end~ on existing JessuD Road, State ROute 2361, extending southwest .24 mile to the intersection of ~allmark Drive; ~allmark Drive, beqLnnin~ at its inter~ection with gessup Roadr extending northeast .06 mile to the intersection of Hallmark COurt~ then east .04 mile to the intersection of ~allmark circle, then southeast .14 mile to the intersection of Hallmark Terrace, then south .07 mil~ to the intersection of Brambleton Road: Hallmark Court, beginning at its intersectLon wi~h Hallmark Drive, extending north .03 mile to e cul-de-sau; Hallmark Circle, beginning at its intersection with H~ll~ark Drive, extending southwest .03 mile to a cul-de-sac~ Hallmark Terrace, beginning at its inter,action with Hallmark Drive, extending w~nt .04 mile to a col-de-soo7 ~rambleton Road, beginning at its intersection wi~h Hallmark Drive, extending east .05 mile 2o a tem:orary turnaround and extending west .OS mile to a temporory turnaround. These roads ~erv~ 69 lots. And be it further resolved that the Board of Supervismrs guarantees to the virginia Department of Highways a 50 ft. right-of-wa? fur all of these roads exceDt Jess~p Road which has a 60 ft. ri~ht~of-way. ThUs section of Lake Farms iz recorded as foll©wB: Section A, Plat Dock 32, Pages 41 and ~2, 0etcher 18, 197§. On motion of Mr. Bookman, seConded by ~. Girone, the Board adopted the following resolution: Whereas~ Secondary Route 714, from Re,tm 902 to Rou=e 711, a distance of 1.9 miles, has been altered and a new road has been constructed and approved by the State Highway Commissioner, which new road se~ves the same citizens as the road so altered; and whereas, certain Sections of this new road follow new locations, these being shown on tho aftached sketch titled, "Changes in Secondary System Due ~o Relocation and Construction on Route 714, Project 0714-O2D-173, ~4~01~" dated at Richmond, virginia, March 1, 1978. NOW, Therefore, Be It Resolved: That the ~ortions bf Secondary Route 714, i.e., Sections 9, ]0, 11, i2, 13~ !4, 15, 16, shown in red on the sketch title~, "Changes in Sec©n~arv System DUe to R~location andConstruction' ©n Eoute 714, Pro~ect ~714-Q20 173, ~.~501," dated at Rioh~ond, Virginia, March 1, 1975, a to,a% distance o~ 0.77 mile be, and hereby is, added to th~ Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to ~ection 33.1-229 of the Code cf Virginia of 1~5~, a~ amen~e~. And further, that the sectionn of old lscation, i.e., Sections t~ 2, 3~ ~ 5, 6, ?, E, show~ in blue on the aforementioned sketch, a total distance of 0.67 milo, be and th~ same hereby i$, abandoned as a public road, pursuant to ~ection 33.1-155 o~ the Code of Virginia o~ 1950, as amended. 3n motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the following ueeolu~ion was adopted: Whereas, SeCOndary Route 7~3~ from 0.08 mile SOuth of intersection ROu~s 663 to intersection Roues 663, a distance of ].08 mile, has buun altered, and a new road has been constructed ~nd approved by the Stats Highway Commissioner, which new road ~srves the same citizens as the road so a~ered:]~ and Locations, the~e being shown on the attached sketch titled, ~n ROute 733, Project 0¥33-020~167, Ct01~'~ date~ at Ki0hm©nd, Zirginia, NOvember 13, 19~1. NO~, Therefore, Be It Resolved that th~ portions of [on~truction on Route 733, Project ~73~-02Q 167, CtQi," dated at ~ichmond~ Virginia, November 13, 1981, a total distance of 0.08 nile, 5e and. herebv is~ added to thm Secondarv System of State Highways, pursuant to Sec=ion 33.1-229 o~ the'Co~e of Virginia of 19~0, as amsndeO; and Further, that th~ sections of old !©ca~i0n, i.e., Sa=rich !, ~hcwn in green on the aforemankloned sketch, s total distance of ~.04 mile, be and same hereby is, abandoned ab a public road, pursuant tO Sottish 33.1-I55 of the Cod~ of virginia, 1950, as )n motion of Mr. Bookman, ~econded bv Mrs. Girone, the Board ~pp~eved the request for a binqo end'or raffle permit for ~0nacan Patrons Association. for calendar year 1.8~.~ ~ 13. ~r, Dill Newe~mb, Assistant Reeident Engineer with the Uirginla Department of ~ighways and Transportation was preaent, He stated that there had bean a preoonstruotion meeting on the Rockwood Park Project and it was anticipated that construction WOuld begin on April 15, 19~2. Mr. Bookman explained to the students present that a new one-way entrance off of Route 360, and a one way exit onto Courthouse Road would be constructed. Mr. Newcomb stated that there wa~ plsnned a work session regarding the 6 Year Plan and ~hat there ware 43 Drc3ects which needed tu b~ re~olvad. Mr. O'Neill stated he felt tel!actors should be placed in the roads on hills and cure,es wh~re n~e4ed for safety. Hr. K~wcomb agreed some are needed for safety purpo~ an~ h~ would look into the ma~ter. ~r. O'Neill stated there were a lot of ~ethotes in the Co~ntu. 5~. N~co~b s~at~d ~kat e study of th~ problem was sent to the district office with thc hope %hat additional funds could be ~btained far all of these improvements. ~r. Daniel inquired about the pothole~ which were ~illed an~ ~r. OINeill e~cused himself from the meeting. April 19, at Richmond District office. 10:00 a.m. for the April 28, 1982 Board of Supervisors Meeting. PYS2-83 secondary read budget. Set a ~ublia he~ring ~or the FY82-~3 e~condarv reed budget at lO:00 a.m, for tko ~ay 26, 1982 Board of S~pervisors mae%int. ~r, Maweoa~ crated that the County and Mighway Department staff %~quired when the project could be anticiDated to be~in. Mr. ~eiay is with the right-of-way. 'tr. Dodd stated the turn lane fer ~inqsdale ~ead is planned but 8~-105 the bridge on Ecoff Street and requested that ~he Highway Department lo~k i~to widening the bridge as pedestrians safely cross. He mtated further that the curve on Route 10 going into Hop~well needs refleo:ors, arrows, signs, dangerous. ~[r. Dodd stated the County h~d their Public hearing on th~ re~triction of truck traffle on Osborne Road and stated he would like the ~ighway Department to hold ~heir hearing prior to working on this project atonq with eleven others. ~ stated that Highway Department had proposed ~ome options for the bridge which design criteria for the ~nford Road bridge: 1. Raised sidewalks on both sides of the bridge. Colonial Style lighting facilities. 4. No vertical screening. of Buford P~ad. Sh~ ~ated also that flooding of di:chcs and Mrs. Girone inquired if the roads at virginia State Campus bad govsrments to review proposed, lOng-range rational plans Drier to Plan thi~ fell and inquired if the ~oard had any comments. On Transportation Study Long Range Element Plan includes proposed 1-9~ which will create considerable disruption and hardship for Transportation Study Long ~ange Element P1Rn unacceptable in that higher priority n~eds in Chesterfield County. 82-106 15.B. 15,0,3. and authorized the County Administrato~ to execute any n~c~sarv documents for Water Contract W80-3C/6($}003!, Balmont~Road, for~ Virginia Utilities, ~c. who submitsd the low bid of based on alternate "E" with th~ contractor furnizhinq the 20" do=tile iron pipe and for the bore croezing of Cogbill Road. further ~he ~oard appropriated $246,412.1S from 563 Surplu~ to 380-1-60031-4393. It ia noted that an appropriation is available from the oap~tal improvement budget in the amount of $196,B55.00. On ~otion of Nm. Bookman, ~cond~d by Mr, DodO, the Board right-of-way for the Provid~nc~ Roa~ widening proj~st. gete~ Unanimous 9n motion of M~S, Girone, seconded by M=. Bookman, the Board 5pproved and aukhcrised the Chairman and COunty Administrator to ~x~cute a ~uit-claim deed vacati~ a 16 foo~ sewer eame~ent Route 147 asross the property of Earris& Ccwan and Owen & ~ virginia General Partnership, 3n motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by ~r. Dodd, the Board iuthorized the County A~torney to institute can~emnati0n 3roceedings aqain~ the ~o'Llowin~ property owners if th~ amount is s~t opposite their names ig not accepts8. An~ be it further :esolv~d that the dounty Administrator notlf¥ g~%d propsr~y )wnens by certified mail of the in~e~tion o~-the County to enter ~pon ~nd take the property which ie to be the subteo~ ~ said :ondemnation p~Ocmedings.' An emergency existinq, this resolutioA ;hall b~ and it hereby is declared in ~ull force and effect J[~ediately upon passage. ~am~s C. and ~ae P. Barden WdO-D3C $183.D0 In motion of Nm. Dodd~ s~conded by Mr. Daniel, the Board rubberized the County A~torns? to institut~ condemnation ~woc~dings against the following property owners if th~ amount :s s~t opposite tkulr na~s is not accepted. And be ,wner~ by certified m~il of the intention of the CoUnty to enter ~pon and take the pr?p~rt¥ %~hich is to be the subject ~f said :ondemnahion prooe~d~nqs_ An smergencv ~×isting, this resolution hall be and it hereby is declared in full force and effect ~onaolidated I~dustries, Inc. Dr. Bevmrly Jones Route 1 and 301 $ 345.00 15.]].I. 15~D.2. 15.D.4. 16, Bevro, A Virginia Partnership Dr, Beverly Jones and Dr. Brigitte DeLaBurde Harry Fr~arcangelo and Mrs. Dante Pratarcan~elo Vote: Unanimoum Route 1 and 301 ROute 1 and 301 ROUte 1 and 301 193.D¢ On motion of Rt. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board approved and authorized tke Countv Administrstor to accept on behalf of the County a 10 ft. strip of land located along Beulah' Road from Robert M. and Jsa~ ~. Kline. Vote: Unanimou~ On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by ~4r, Bookman, the Board approved and authorized the County AdministratOr to accept on ~ehalf of the County a 10 ft. ~trip of land located along Lee ~treet from the Cheeterfiel~ Ccunt~ School Board. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconde~ by Mr. Bookman, the Board approved and authorized the County Administrator to accept on b~half of the County a 10 ft. strip of !and located along Buford Road, adjamm~t %O Suford Co~rt~ from Clalborn~ ~. and Mary R. Thomas$on, Vote: Unanimous On motion of Mr. Daniel, s~oonded by Mr. Bookman, the ~oard app-oved and authorized the Chairman and the Count? AdmJ. nistratur Applega~e and J. J. Jewett for B80-88C/3, Little ~omahaw~ Creek Vote: Unanimous Mr. Painter presen=ed the Board with a co~? of the d~ve%oDer Mr. Hedriek Stated the County had been notified that the road~ in the following subdivisions had been formally acceDted into the state Secondary System effective a~ indicated: Kin~sland Acres, Section 3 (3-03-82) Firethorne Lane - B~ginniR~ a~ ~he intersection with Kingsland Aced, Route 611; and running ~ou~h~rly mile to the int~r~ection with SDringshire Drive, tken continuing southerly 0.02 mile to end iD ~ ~ead end. $pringshire Drive - Begihning at the intersection ~ith Firethorne L~ne and running easterly 0.08 mile to in a temporary turnaround. T£neberry Trace, Sections 3 and 4 Tinstree Drive - Beginning at ~he intersection ~ith Lenqth 0.08 mi. mi_ 82-105 Happy NilI Road, and running southwesterly O.lO mile to the intersection w~th Timberline D~ive, then continuing southwesterly 0.17 mile to the intersect/on with TinSberry Drive, than continuing southwesterly O.D7 mile to end at the intersection with Silv~rtree Lane. 0.34 mi Timberline Drive - Deginning at the intersection with Tinstree Drive and running southerly, D.02 mile to tie into existing Timberline Drive, acute 1192. 0.02 mi. Tinsberry Drive - Beginning at the intersection with Tinstree Drive and Zunning northwest~rly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac, again Tineberry Drive~ beginning at the intersection with Tinstree Drive and running south@esterly 0.05 mile to the intersection with Tinsberry COurt~ th~n continuing easterly 0.02 mile to tie into existing Tinsberry Drive, Route 1191. 0.12 mi. Tinsberry Court - B~ginning st the intersection with with Tinsberry Drive and running southerly 0.O~ mile to end in a cul-de-sac. 0.05 mi. $ilYertree Lane - ~e~inning a~ the intersection with Tinstree Dri~a and running northwesterly 0.03 mile to tie into ~roposed Silvertree Lane~ Section 5, again Sitvcrtree Lan~, beginning at the intersection with Tinetree Drive and running southeasterly O.03 mile to end in a cul-d~=$ac. 0.06 mi. Morningside ~?OQde, Section 1 Gentian Road - B~ginning at its intersection with Genera Road, RO~te 604, extending ~outhwest 0.03 mile to the intersection of Gentian Court, the~ 0.09 mile to the intersection of Genlou Road, then southwest 0.10 mile to the intersection of Gentian Place, thee southwest 0.03 mil~ to a temporary turnaround. 0.25 mi. ~ention Court - Beginning at its intersection with Gentian Road, extending northwest 0,0g mil~ to a cul-de-sac. O_OB mi. Gsnlou Road - ~eginninq at its intersection ~ith Gentian Roa~ ~xt~nding northwest 0.06 mile to tie into prapoze~ Genlou Roa~, Morningeide Woode~ Section 2. 0.06 mi. Gentian Place - Beginning at it~ intersection with Gan%ion Road, exten~in~ northwest D.04 mile to a cul=de-sac. 0.04 mi. Bexley Cosmopolitan, Phase 1 (3-08-82) Rams Crossing - BegiDning at its intersection with Droadstone Road, Route 2682, axtendinff easter!v 0_1% mile to th~ intersection Of Torquay LOOp then,' easterly 0,22 mile to the intersection of Libra Loop. 0.3~ mi. Torguay Loop - A circular road beginning at its intersection with Rams Crossing extending northwesterly 0.07 mile to intersect with itself, then continues mile in a circular direction to reintersect with Beginning at its intersection with Ricks goad, State Route 6~7, extending southerly 0.07 mile to %he intersection of Rams C~ossinw then southerly 0~05 mile to the int~raection of L©ckhart Road, ~tate Route Qense Wood Hill (3-11-82) Wemack Road - Beginning at the end of State maintenance, existing Route 1~21, end running northeasterly 0.09 milo to the intersection with Great Branch Drive. 0.09 mi. Groat Branch Drive - Beginning at the intersectio~ with ~7omack ROad and running easterly 0.17 mile to end in a cul-de-aac~ aqain Great Branch Drive beginning at the intersection with Wcmaok Road and runninw northwesterly 0.25 mile to end in a te~lporary turnaround. 0.42 mi ~en~th 0.12 mi. Mrs, Girune stated that at the March 10, 19~2 meetin~ the Board had requested th~ Circuit Court Judgeo to appoint a ~rmenent Board of Equalization of R~al Estate Assessments. She stated that this action thereby :e~uirsd the appointment of onlv three membsr~ with staggered term~ rather than the five member~ as appointed in thm past. After discussion of this matter, i~ was on ~otion o~ Mrgo Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, r~s~lved that the Board of Supervisors hereby rescinds its motion of March 10, 1982 re.astir9 the Circuit Court Sud~es to appoint a permanent Boars of Equalization Of Real Estate Assessments. Ve~e; Unanimous On motion of ~rs. Giron~ seconded bv Mr. nodd, ~he Board o~ gupervisora respectfully requests th~ Circuit COUrt Judges %o create a Board Of ~q~alization of R~al Estate Assessments for 1981 ~eneral reassessm~nt and appoint five members in accordance with Sections 58-898 and 58~899 of the Code of Virginia, and further hbo Board r~quests that the Circuit Court Judqes appoint th~ fei%owing people to serve On this Board~ 1. Mr. John Royall Robertson ~atoaca District Midlothian District 4. Mr~ Robert L. Underwood Reconvening: On motion of th~ Board, the %ollowing re~olution wag Whereas, the State ~ater Control B~rd has th~ responsibility for developing a ~asto load all,cation plan for the Upper James River ~atuary; and ~ozeae, ~he County of Che~tezfield's wa~tewater treatment plants discharge into this segment of ~he James River and this waste lead al!coo=ion plan will have a direct effect un the construction co~t a~d operating cost of the seweraq~ system7 and 82-110 17. Wheream, the State Water Control Board has developed a preliminary "Waste Load Allecatiun Strategy" which includes three alternatives that assicn the County between 2,10D and 2,600 lbs. of BeD5 total allocation. ~uw, Therefore, Be It Resolved that the Chesterfield County ~oazd of Supervisor~ deed hereby request that all partie~ discharging in t~e Upper Ja~e~ Ri~er h~tuary be treated equally in the ~llooation of flow, BOD~ loading and degree of treatment required in the development cf this plan. And Further Be It ~e~olved that flow and BObs loading be kept in reserve and distributed a~ needed. And Further Be It Resolved tkat, in the event it is nob deemed feasible to hold allocation in reserve, the Chestsrfield County hoard of Supervisors requests tha~ the County be granted an additional allocation of 3~5~0 1D~./dav BOb to be lo~ted in the the river segment between Hopewell and DutCh Gap. VoLe= Unanimous 82S032 In Bermuda Magisterial DistrieB, 9mmsn V. Haley, Jr. requested a Mobile ~ome Permit to park a mobile home on property which he owns and better known as 7~10 Pioneer Street. Tax Map 67-11 (2) Rayon B&rk~ Block 19, Lot~ 36-39. ~r. Haley ~as present. There wa~ nQ opposition prassnt, on motion of M_~. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Book~en, the Board approved this request for a period of five years subject to the fellowiug standar~ conditions: 1. The applicant mast be the owner and occupant of the mobile home. 2. No lot or parcel may be rgnbed or leased fur usa as a mobile home eit~ nor shall any mobile home be used for r~ntal property. Only on~ (5) elebile home shall be permitted to be parked on an individual lot or parcel. and other zoning requi~ment~ of disgrace shall be complied with, e×c,pb that no mobile hems shall be located closer than 20 £oat to residence. 4. No a~ditional permamsnt-tyFe living a mobile home, All mobile homes.shall be skirted but shell ~--~i¢les shall not be stors~ underneath the ~obile home. 5. ;~ere public (County) wa%er and/or ~ewer are a~ailable~ they shall be 6. Upon being granted a permit for a mobile home~ the applicant must then obtain the necessary permits ~rom the building Inspector's Office. Thi~ must 5e done prier to the installation or relocation of the unit. 7. Any violation of the above conditions shall be grounds for r~vocation of a mobile hems permit fur a mobile home. Vote: Unanimous 828033 In Bermuda Magisterial District, Charles and Helen Dawkin~ requested a Mobile Home Permit to park a ~obile home on property 81-111 67 11 (2) Rayon Park, Block 20, Lots il.through 17. ISheet 28). The applicant wad not present. There wa~ no opposition present. On ~otion of ~r. Dodd, seconded by ~r. Book/aaa, the Board approved the request for e period of five year~ subject to the following ~tandard 1. The ~pplieant must be the owne~ and occupant of the mobile ho~e. 2. No !~t or parcel may be rented or leased for us~ as homo site, nor shall Ray mobile home be used for rental property. Only one (1) mobile hom~ shall be permitted ~o be parked on an individual lot or parcel. The minimum lot size, yard ~ezbaoks, required front yard, and diker zoning requirements of th~ applicable ~oning district shall be cemDli~ with, ~xc~pt that no mobile home shall b~ toasted cto~er ~han 20 feet to any existing residence. 4. No additional permanent-typo living space may be added onto a mohil~ ho~e. Alt mobile homes shall be skirted, but shall article= ~hali not h~ stored un~ernea~hhhe mobile home. Where publis {County) waLer and/or sower are available, they shell be used. 6. Upon being granted a permit for a mobile hom~ the applicant mUSt then obtain bke necessary p~mi%s from the Building Inspsctor's Office. Thi~ must be done prior ho the installation or relocation of the unit. 7. Any violation of tko above conditions ~hall bo grounds for ~1S087 In Clover ~itl and at,lothian ~gisteria~ D~stricts, Midlothian Development Corporation r~quested an amendment ~o a previously granted Conditional Use Planned Development (Case ~79S142) to permit a 15 foot exception to the 15 foot parking requirement from public roads for all To%fnhouse-For-sale traits in Evergreen. This property lies in two Ssparate tracts. The west tract fronts aporoximetely 4200 feet on the ~est line of Coalfiad Road, is partially bordered by Old ~undred Road on the ~outh and is bordere~ by Little Tomahawk Creek to the west. The ~ast tract fronts approximately 2600 ~eeb on Genito Road is bordered on the west b}~ proposed Route 1-28S, pa~tially on north by Issac Walton P~rk and the eas~ line lies 5200 feet from its west line. Tax Map 26 (1) par~ of parcel 6; Tax Map 36 (1~ parcels 7 and g; TaX ~ap ~? (1) parcel 2 and parts or ~arcels 1, 3, 5, 9, and 12: Tax Map 37-3 [1) parcel 16; Tax Map 37-7 parcel l; ?ax Map 48 (1) parcel 48 and pa:ts of parcel 46 {Sheets ~r. Balderson stated the applicant had requested withdrawal of this application. There was ce one present to address the matter. On motion of ~r. Book, an, second~g by MrS. Girone, the Bmar~ accepte~ the applicant's recuest for withdrawsl~ Vote; Unanimous 82-112 81S088 In Bermuda Magisterial District, Alvie C. N. Roland requested a Conditional Use to permit a stock farm (100 rabbits} in a Residential (R-7} District On a .46 acre parcel fronting approximately 100 feet on the southeast line of ~alnu~ Drive and located approximately 3Q0 feet southwest of its intersection wit] Sir Peyton Drive. Tax Map 135-12 (9) Prestwould Farms, Section A, Block A, Lot 1 {Sheet 42). Mr. ~slderson stated the applicant had requested withdrawal of this application. There was no on~ present to address chis matter. On motion of Mr. DodO, seconded by }~rs. Gfrone, the Vote: Unanim©us In Matoaca Magisterial District, Carl Bogese Associates, Inc. regueste~ rescuing ~rcm Residential (R-!2) and Residential. to Residential (R-9) of 97.4 acres and to Residential (~-25) Of 1~ acres. This property lies in two separate tracts. The first ~ract fronts approximately lQ00 feet on Happy Hi~l R~ad and also fronts aDproximately 709 feet On Fielding Road and is located in the northwest quadraDt of the intersection of these made. The second tract fronts approximately 150 feet on Happy H~ll Road an( also fronts approximately ~00 feet on Fieldln~ Road an~ fe located in the southwest quadrant of the fnt~r~etlon Qf these reads. Tax Map !4~-2 [1) parcel 1 (Sheet ~r. Bald=teen stated that the appliuant had requested withdrawal of this application. Ther~ wa~ no uae p~esent to address this matter, On motion of M/. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Qircne~ the Boar~ accepted the app!icant~s rscuest for withdrawal. 21S065 In Clover Hill Magisterial District, R~ ~. Adams, Sr. requested Con,itt©ual Use to permit ~ StOCk farm (50 chickens} in a Residential (R-7) DistriCt On a 1.5 acre parcel fronting approximately 230 feet on the east line of Rock Spring Drive and located directly across from its intersection with Jamson Road, Tax Map 52-5 {5} Rock Springs Farm, Section B, ~lock ~, lot 14 (Sheet 15). ~Ir. Salderson stated th~ ~pDticent had re~uested a 30 day deferral of this case. Mr. Clarence Stirrer stated that he was time~ before. Mr. Daniel stated that he was net aware of the request for deferral until several minutes before and that he understands Mrs. Adams is in the hospital and requested 5hat thi~ pe~itlen signed by 47 of the area residents within 4QQ-500 f~et who were opposed. On motion of Nr. DanisI~ seconded by Mr, Boekman~ the Board deferred consideration of this request until April 28, 1982, as reguesfed by the applicant, 81Sl4E In Clover Mill ~Iagisterial District, $=amie E. Lvttle requested Conditional Use Planned Development to permit e×~anslon Qf a~ existin~ mobile home park to include ~1 additional spaces and to permit s×c~ptions to the bulk requirements o~ the Zoning O=dlnance on a 5.12 acre parueI fronting approximately 470 feet 113 on ~he south line o~ M±dlothian Turnpike and located ~pp~eximate].y 1800 feet w~st o~ its inter~ectiQn with Wadsworth Drive. Tax Map 28-1 (1) parcel 8 (sheet 8). Mr. ~aldereon stated the applicant had requested a 90 day deferral'. There wag no One pre,eot to discuss this matter. On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by ~fr. Dodd, the BOard approved the request and ~e~erred consideration of this matter until June 23~ t982. 81SQ75 (Amended) In Bermuda Magisterial District, The Village Courts requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) %o Residential (R-7) plus a Conditional Use to permit Sl multiple familv units on a 10 acre parcel fronting approxlmately 6SO feet On the east line of De Lavial Street and located approximately 570 feet north of its Lot 6 and Tax ~p 115~6 (2) I~. C. Trueheart, Lots 7 and ~ (~heet 32). ~r. ~alderson stated the applicant had requested a 60 day matter. ~r. Dod~ suggested a 90 day deferral_ After ~urther discussion of the matter, it wag on motion ef Mr. Dodd, seconded by ~. Daniel, resolved that this request be deferred until June 23, 1982. In Dale ~agie~erial District, Kenneth E. Copsland recuested an Conditional Use (Case %79~101 B) to eliminate the raqulrements to construct a twenty {20) feet widening strip for the entire length of the property abutting Centralia Road an~ a le~t turn lane along Cenfiralfe Road. This parcel fronts approximately 236 feet on the north line of Centralia P~ad and is leeated approximately 600 feet we~t of its inter~ction with Salem Church Road. T~X ~{ap 96-6 (1] parcel 45 (Sheet 31). ~-. Baldsrson stated %he Planning Ce~iesi0n had recommended approval of this r~qu~st subject to certain conditions. Mr. Cop=land stated he ~ould like the request approved aS oriyinally submitte~ witheut the condition~ r~commended by tke Planning Commission and staff. ~e stated that he would prefer to that ~e would submit a performance bond which ~ould cover that cost. H~ stated that i% ie not necessary at this time. Mrs. Girone inquired if Centralim Road were planned to bs four-laned. ~r. Balderson stated that other parcels requesting zoning had stated hs would accomplish ~his simultaneously with the other record, Mr. Daniel corrected the vote taken by ~he Planning Commission. On motion of Mr. DaAiel~ seconde~ by Mrs. Girone, th~ Board approved this request subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant ~hell peet bond with the CoUnty for from the centerline of Centralia Road ~o the face of the curb and gutter. Thi~ ~on~tructicn shall be constructed with curb and gutter for the entire lenqth of the property fronting along C~ntralia Road. The bond shall be submitted prior to release of the final occupancy permit. 82-114 ore: Unanimous ~S015 n ~a%oaca Magisterial District, Turner & Associates requested arching from Agricultural (A) to Convenience Business (g-i) =lus Conditional U9e Planned Development te permit: a 25 foot ×caption to the fifty (50) foot front yard mattock for parking7 reduction of the size of p~rkin~ mpaces fro~ th~ ~squire~ 0' × 20' to 9~ × 18'; and a 3 parking spa~e exception to the 26 pace requirement ~n a 1.042 acre parcel fronting approximately 9§ feet cn the we~ line of C~urthouse Road mhd located pprQximately 250 feet south of it9 intersection with Hull Stree~ cad. Tax Map 49~8 (1) parcel 39 (Sheet r. Balderson sba%ed the Planning Commission had recommended ~reva! of %him request subject to certain conditions bu~ denied he sxception to the ~0 foot re.~uired sat~aok. H~ stated ~urthar hat the site plan as sub, it%ed did not meek all the here was no opposition present. On ~otion of Mr. h~ followin~ conditions but denied %he sxoeptlon to the 50 Ct. squired setbazk~ purpose of cpmretlng a day care centsr which shall not follow'hq bulk exceptions shall be granted: each twenty (20~ chiLdrsn enrolled up to a maximum Qf six (6) spaces plus o~e for each employem. Tho parkinG building by a sidewalk ~e a~ to preclude tko need for B. Of the total number of spasms provided, thirty All the r~maining parking mp~Ces shall conform to Zoning ordinance reGuirement oC l0 fe~t by 2~ feet. ~hall align with the entrance/e×i~ into ©xbridga Square shopping Center. The exact design and location shall be Prior fo obtaining a building permit, the applicant shall 5. The above stated conditions notwithst~ndng, the bulk requirements of the COnVenience Business {E-i) District shall be applicable. (Note: Frier to obtaining a building permit, schematic plans must be submitted to and approved bv the Plannin~ Commission, S2S016 In Midlothian Magisterial Distriet, L. Howard Jenkln~, III requested an amendment to a previously granted Conditional Use Planned Development (Case ~79SZII) to ~ermit a hea~th club associa~e~ with a ehiroQractic offic~ and a third free-standing sign in a Convenisnc~ Business {B-l] District on a 12 ac~s parcel ~rent~nq appro×imatelv 400 feet on ~idlotkian Tu-np±ke also fronting approximately 850 ~eet on Coalfisld Road and located in the southe&~t quadrant of the intersection of these roads and bett~r kmowm as ~i~lotAian Station Shopping C~nt~r. Tax 1S-!2 (1) parcel 39 (Sheet Mr. Sslder~on stated the Planning Commission had approved the requ*~ for the kealth club but denied the requ~ for the %res- standing sign. Mr. Fred Gray ~¢as p~sent representin~ the applicant. There was no opposition present. Mrs. Girone stated she felt there needed tO be a third sign, and after further discussion, it was on her motion, seconded by ~r. Daniel, resolved that this request as submitted bv the applicant be approved subject to the sign being constr~cted and erected as shown by th~ rendering eubmitts~ as part of th~ application. Vote: Unanimou~ 82S018 In ~id!othlan ~{agisterial Di~trictr The Covington Company requested a Conditional Use to permit 79 multiple family units (condomlni%L~) in a Residential Townhousa-For-Sale (R-TH} District and to amend the ~reffered condition for Cas~ delete tie requirement for a s~eond ro~d access On a 9~21 acr~ parcel which li~s at th~ %;estern te~inus of ~roundhog Drive. Tax Map ~-12 (1) parcel 1 and Tax ~iap 10-9 (1) parcel 6 (Sheet Hr, B~l~ersQn ~tated the Planning Commission had denial cf the request for the deletion of the requirement for s~cQ~d :cad access and approved the Conditional ~se to p~mit con,true%ion of 79 multi-family units subject to certain conditions. Tha~e was no Opposition present. ~rs. Circus stated the ares residents a~ ~n agreement with the proposal but inquired if there could be a play,round area. ~r. Jim Cevinqton would lo~k into another playground area. ~rs. Giro~e inquired about thm fire hyd~ast~ because of the terrain of the ares. Mr, Covington stated they would be installed as required. After further discussion it was on motion Qf Mrs. Gironet request for the deletion of the pro£fer~d requirement for a construction of 79 multi-family units subject to the following conditions: Public water and sewer shall be used and the developer shall submit water and sewer pla~s for approval to the County Util:tie$ Department prior eo the i~uance ©f anv building C Chesterfield plier to the i~suance of any building ~ermit. The developer shall provide an accurate account Of the drainage situation, showing existing drainage and the impact this project will have on th~ site and the. surrounding area, The developer shall submit a plan to the Environmental Engfn~erlng which will provide for on and off-site drainage control. The plan shall explain the method and show the facilities to be utilized in the hydraulic engineering of this project. This plan mhall be approved by Environmental Engineering prior to the issuance of any building permit or clearing of land and implemented prior to the ~ssuanee of any occupancy permit. 3. The developer shall ~ubmit a plan for erosion end sediment control to Environmental Engineering. Such a plan sh~ll be comprise~ of vegetative and engineering practices outlined in the "Erosion and Sediment Control Technical Handbook" published by the James River $oil and Water Ce~ee~vation District) to be utilized as erosion and sediment control measures for the project. The plan shall be approved by ~nvironmental ~ngineeriug prior to the issuance of any building permit and implemented prior to el%sting any land. 4. The total number of dwelling unit~ i~ any One building er structure shall nut exceed ten (10] and no structure shall ~xce~d 200 feet in length. $. Ali roads, driveways and parking areas shall be paved, curbed and ~uttered. 6. Any and all apartment ~uildingE eonstruOted along any public road shall front or side that road(s) er r~ar yards shall be screened from view 09 that road. If buildings do not front er aide a public road, a specific screening plan shall be submitted tO Development Review for approval in cOnjunctiOn wi~h final site plan submission. t. Ail buildings stall Ds located twenty-five (25) feet from all public streets, private drives and entrances. All structures shell be a minimum of fifteen (15 ) feet from any parking space. 9. Si~ewalk~ shall be provide~ and mhown on the plan. Such sidewalks shall have a width of at least thre~ (3) to (5) feet. Perking 9paces ~hall be provided at a ratio of two spaces per dwelling unit. I1. The residents of thi~ phase shall have uae of the existing zee~eational facilities in Edgehill TOwnheuee Subdivision, 12. The d~v~toper shall provide an adequate number of trash containers, the number of which shall be determined by County Health Department. All out'esr trash receptacl~ shall ~e screened from view by a solid ~oard ~ence or evergreen planting. Trash collection shall be on a regular basis ~n order to prevent any health a building permit, architectural renderings shall be Vote: Unanimous 82-117 19. It was generally agreed the Board would recess until 7:00 p.m. Reconvening: The Board met and discussed various matters of interest with the District Volunteer Fire Chiefs. On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board adjourned at 9:00 p.m. until 5:00 p.m. on March 31, 1982. ~Vote: Unanimous County Administrator '. -er±in O Neill, ~r~ Chairman 82-118