The URL can be used to link to this page

05-26-1982 Minutes upervi~ors in Attendance: tr. E. Merlin ©'Neitl, Sr., Chairman frs. Joan Girenef vice Chairmen Ir. C. L. Bookman ~r. llarry G. Daniel lt. R. Garland Dodd t~. ~ichard L. Hedrick ~ounty Administrator Staff in Attendance: Dir. of Planning Nursing Home Admin. R~gistrar County Admlni~tratcr of Ceneral services of Numan Services ~nvironmentR1 Eng. of Community Dmvelup. of Utilities social Services Mrs. ~irone called the meeting to order at the Courthouse at 10~00 a.~. (EDST). Mr. Bookman gave %he invocation. Mx. Dedd joined the meeting. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by ~. Rock. an, the Board approved the minutes of May t2 and 24, 19S2, a~ ~ubmitted, ~nbj~ct ~o approval by Mr, Aves: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Bookman, Mr. Da~ial and ~ir. ~0sent: Mr. O'Neill. Mr_ Hedge $~ate~ th~ County had received the Municipal Finance 0~£1cers As~ceiatic~ Award of the Certificate of Conformance. H~ stated that this award is tke highest form of recognition in the area of governmental financial reporting and i~s attainment represent~ a ~igniflcant accomplishment by a government amd its zanagement, ~e stated the standards for ellg~bilitv for the program ~re quite high an~ as of January, 1982, only 222 localities and two ~tates hold the certificate nationwide. ~e ~tate~ the award will be formally presented to the ~oard when it is received. The Board commended the financial managemen~ departments for this high award cf excellence. ~, Mussy s=ated that the Building officials and Code Administrators are now Operating a N~tional Certification ~zogram for Code Inspector testing twice a year. He mtated that gix 82-195 nspectors have been certified natio~ally~ five are partially ertifi~d at this tine and most of thes~ have bean or Dian to be ertified in several areas. The seard commended Mr~ Muzzy, Mr. fodder and tka inspectors receiving the sertifioation~. was generally agreed to d~fer consideration of remolutionm ~r ~tudent organizations a~ ~eadowbroek ~iqh school and Mrs. nnis Crowder for outstanding volunteer service to the County ursine 5omo un~i~ la,ar ~n the d~y. r. o'Neill joined the m~e%ing. r. Masden stated that in con~er~ with ~he State and ~atien, t i~ recoI~ended that the week of June 6-I2, 1982 be declared hild Abuse Prevention Week. ~e ~tated that a letter had been eceiv~d from the Chair~w/n of the Governor's Council on Child buss co~mending Chesterfi~ld'e Multldisoipline Team for utstandln? work with this problem. He introduc~ Mr$. Suzanne %eming, Supervisor of the Mu%tidieeip%ine Team. Mrs. Fl~ming tared that this Team wa~ established six years a~O and wz~ the irst in the State. She stated that they are very pleased wi~h h~ goals and objectives which hav~ b~en accommli~hed during this ;cried. She stated the Team enjoys a very goo~ working ~el~tlenehip with other COmmunity agencies in the County and ~ogether they are providing a needs~ service and nr~ sharing ;=sources and talentm available. Mr. Daniel inquired if these ~ypes of c~s~s were increasing. Mrs. Fleming ~tated the number ~f reported case~ are intreasing~ Mr. Hedrick inquired if the L0mestic problems incieass when there exists a stressful economy. frs. Fleming indicated Ehis was true as domestic problems usually ~eCur because of ether problems, ~uch as financial. Mrs. 'leming introduced menmber~ of bhe Team who were present e~ well .s other~ who participate from Mental HealtA/M~ntal Retardation :ervices and Youth Services. She alee presented the Board with nformation on the team and brochures on child abuse and select. On motion Of the Board~ the following r~eolution was dopted: Wi~er~as~ Child abuse and neglec~ is a reality that toBches ll segments of the community of Chesterfield County; and wheream, The Chesterfield County Beard of SuQervieers etiev~s that children are best S~rved i~ ~belr o~n hemes and hat the ~actore that cr~a~e child mistreatment can be addressed itt support from community resources; and whereas, The community services agencie~ an~ private itizens have joined hands to s~rengahen the family's ability to engines functioning eD a femily; and Wherea~, The Chesterfield County Boai~ ef Supervisors ecegnizes and suppor~s the efforts of Chesterfield~s a~ncies~ itizens and families ho resolve the issue of child abuse and select. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved tha~ ~he w~ek Qf June 6-12~ 9S2, be Dr©claimed "Child Abuse ~reventicn Week" and that thi~ esotution be called %0 the attention of all citizens. o%e: Unanimous r. Daniel stated that there is so much ~isc~esion of "what is tong with America" today. He ~%ated that he would like to ~pres$ "what iD right with America" today. He stated two years ~o a ~kudent at Meadowhroek High School, Mike Morris, was njured during a diving asciden%. He stated the students~ the 82-196 :o~unit? end ChEsterfield Cable Communications had worked ~ogether by sponsoring a carnival and a telethon to raise money ~or $ van for Nike as he is confined to a whselchairb Hr_ Daniel ~ntzeduced Mr. Buchanan, ~incipal of Meedowbro~k High School, ?unary Terry, President of the Student Cooperative Association and (ike ~%orris as well as San~ra Svlvestry Vinos Waldron and Tony ;aWSen wto were a=tive in the f~nd raising campaign. Mr. ~uohanan stated that approximately $14,000 had been raise~ for ~he pu~chas~ of the special van for Mike whi'ch cost is $17,000. )n motion of the Board, the follewi~'g resolution wes edopted~ Whereas, The student organizations of Meedowbrook ~igh ;ohoo1, under th~ auspices of the Studunt Cooperative ~ssocia~lon, participated in individual fund raising activities ~hroughcut th~ academic year, 1981=82; and Whereas, Student and faonlt¥ organizations held an all. day arnlval on Ap~il 25, 1~81, at M~adowbrook High School; and ' Whereas, The Media Club in cooperation with Chesterfield able Communications wrote, produced and directed a five ~our ;elathon, enlisting both studen~ and professional talent on May [6, 1982~ and Whereas, These efforts unified the student body, faculty, ~taff and community of Neadewbrook ~igh School for th~ co~on ~urpo~ of raising fun~s to purchase a van fur Mike Morris~ a ~tudent who was paralyzed in a diving accident in JUne, 1980. Now~ Therefore, Be ~ Aesolved that the Board of Supervisors ~f Chesterfield County, co,and the principal, staff and ~t~dents is well as members of the surrounding community, for their ;nseifish glvin~ of time, energy and talents in a scheol and ~O~uni~y-wide effort to help a f~llow human being in need. ~ote: Unanimous Ir. Daniel pregent~d ~. Buchanan with the resolution. ~. Qillentine gtated that Mrs. Crowder, a volunteer at th~ !he~%erfield County Nursing Home, had donated aporoximatelv .O,OO~ hourg for th% past ~ight years which ~ould amount to pproximatel~ $47-48,000 if she had been a salaried e~nloyee, Be ntroduced Mrs. Crowder. Mrs. Crowder ~tated that thi~ ecognition was a pleasur~ and an honor but that the residents f the Nursing Home, their families an~ the staff had given her ach more %hen she had given to them. She sta~ed that she loved elpinq people and this wa~ very fulfilling. Plotion of the Board, the fei!owing resolution was a~epted: Whereas, Mrs. Annie M. Crowder has teen a volunteer worker the Ches=erfield County Nursing Home for eight years; and Whereas, Mrs. Crowder serves the residents and the tivities Department of the ~ureing Home as seamstress, clerical ssistaut and distributes rssldents' mail, makes daily i~itations to listen and talk with th~ residents, and performs then ~asks as necessary for the residents' well being7 and whereas, Mrm. Crowder demonstrates patience, Understanding ad genuine enthusiasm in her attention to th~ r~sidents' comfort sd needs; and ~ereas~ During Mm. Crewder~s eight years of service ~e the ~rsing ~cme, ~he has contributed over t0,OQ0 volunteer hours. 82-197 now, Therefore, Be It 9esolv~d that the Chesterfield Countv card of supervisors hereby sxuresses their sincere appreciatio~ nd gratitude to Mrs. Annie ~.-crowder for her resp©nmlbls and edicated service to the County of Chesterfield and specifically Ts. Irene McDonald, Parks and Recreation Dept., introduced ~sdames Judy Fergu~on~ Cynthia DUO,On and Janet Crow, apres~ntatives of the Junior Woman'~ Club of Cheater who were iresent. Mrs. McDonald ~tate~ that the Department and the %man's Club had co-spOnsored several te%n functions and the 'apartment did not realize the Club intended to donate fundn tO he County. Mrs. Fergeson presented Mr. Dedd with a check in the mount of $500 for a ~wing set at Ecoff Park. Mr. Dodd aca~pted he funds and thanked the Club for the donation. ~rs. FargUSCn tared that %ha Club planned to h~ve other functions and donate ddit~onal funds in the future. On motion of the Board, the hack for $500 was accepted and the Board expressed its ppreciation to the Junior Woman's Club u£ Chester foe this ontribution. r. Bsdrick stated that %he County dots receive donations of unds from tim~ to ti~e but that %olunteeru also donate time fo m~roving the facilities. ~ stated that within fha last four ear period, 3~O,OO0 hours of volunteer time had been donated by ~1~5 volunteers and if paid minimum ~ag~, would have cost r. ~edrick stated this date and time ha~ been advertised for ~blic hearing ~o conelder an ordinance establishing the annual ~x levy on variou~ classes u~ property for ~he C~nty. ~at~d this ordinance was adopted on an emergency basis at the ~rll 7, 1982~ meeting but in order tn cenp!y with all sectienn ~ the Coder it had been a~vartised for this date. There was no ~e in the audience present ~o address thim matter. ~s. ~irone .abed that she had one call from the Square Dance Club opposed ) the_fac system for th~ parks and thaC she had explained to ]~m tna~ thia was for a one y~ar trial period et this t~me. %ere being no further discussion, it was on motion of [rone~ Seconded by Mr. sookman, resolved that the ~oard adopt ~ following ordinance: An Ordinance fo Establish the Annual Tax Lm-~ on Yar~ous Clas~es of Property the County of Chesterfield B~ It Ordalne~ by the Board of Suu~rvfsers of the County of ~esterfleld tha~ for the year beginning on th~ firs~ day of ~nuarv, 1982, end ending on the thirty-first day of 182, the taxes on property in all the~agisterial Districts of [~ County cf Chesterfield shall be as follows: Sec. 1. Real PTO~Sr~v and ~ebLle He.es On tracts of land, lots or improvements thereon and un mobile Acmes the tax shall be $0.9~ on every $1OO of the assessed value thereof. Sec, 2. Personal Property. On automobiles, trailers, boatm~ boat trailers, airplanes, other motor vehicles; and on all tangible personal property used or held in connection with any mining, manufacturiDg er other business, trade, occupation or profession, including furnishings, furniture and apptiancem in renfai' units, the tax shall be $3.60 on everv $100 of the amsessed value thereof. Sec. 3. Public Service Corporation Property. (a) On that portion uf th~ r~al estate and tangible personal property of public service corporations which has been e~ualized as provided in Sec. ~8-511.I of the Co~e of Virginfa, as amended, %he tax shall be $0,98 on every of the assessed value thereof d~t~rmined by ~he ~tate Corporation Commission. (b} On ~hat portion of the real e~tate and tmngibl~ personal property of public ~erv~ec corporations which has not been equalized as provided in Section 5S~512.1 of the Code of Virginia, a~ amende~, the tax shall be $3.2O on every $1O0 of assessed value thereof dete~mLned by the State (c) The foregoing ~ubsections to the contrary public service corporations the tax shall be $3.6D on every $100 cf asse$$e~ value thereof. The ~oar~ being polled, the vote wa~ am follows: the Board later in the day to schedule a work session for Hr. Bedrick stated thim date and tim~ had been scheduled Sot a public hearing to consider an ordinance relating to the discharge of air or gas operated weapon~. ~r. ~ockman stated he felt the portion of th~ ordinance regarding th~ 6~0 ft. rsstrlction wa~ ~oo long as pel!et~ from gas opera,sd wsaocns cannot trevel that distance. He inquired if 300 ft. would be satisfactory, Captain Applewhite ~tated that would be enforceable. Mr. O'Neill inquired what the old ordinance stated which was left out of the Code inadver=ently as there wa~ ne problem of which he wa~ aware ~ith that law. He e~ated that he did not fe~l this ordinance was mn proper form and felt another ordinance should be drafted. ~e inquired further if the e~dinance could prohibit shooting across property lines and allow shooting toward~ the wood~. Mr_ Minok~ Stated this ~ould be covered under the trespass law. 82~199 ~r. Hedrick stated that es he understood the Board, they weuid l~ke an Q~dinancE which would allow juveniles who de not abuse the privilege of discharging ~hese describe~ weapens on their own property, if large tracts, and to hunt without a guardian to be allowed to do so and kho~e who abuse it to be denied this :rivilepe. The Board indicated this was correct. ~%tar ~urther di~eh~sionr it was on motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Bookman, ~esalved that f~rther discussion o~ this matter be deferred until June 9, 19~R at 10tO0 a.m. in order that Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mr. ~oekman, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Dedd. ~trs. Girone returned to the meeting. Mr. Hedrick stated this data and tim~ had been advertised fez a public hearing to consider the lease of the closed portion of the Chester land£~ll. There ~as no one present to d&SCUSs this mattar~ On motion of Far. ~sokman, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board approved and authorized the County A~ministrator to execute a leas= with Jack T. Shoosmi=h fur a period of sixty (60~ months for the closed portion of the Chester landfill, a copy of which is filed with the paper~ O~ this Board. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Eedrick stated this date and time had been adver%ise~ for a public hearinc to consider the I982-~3 Secondary Road Budget. Mr. $~illiams Sresented the Board with a li~t of projectm to be ~ompleted wit~ th~ budget of $1,690,~07. Mrs. Girane stated felt the railroad company should contribute to the repairs on the Buford Roa~ Bridge. ~. He,rick stated a letter had b~e~ written and they Eits~ a seution of the law ~hich indicated they were not responsible fur repair o~ the b~idge. Mrs. Girone ~tate~ that it was their bridge and their train had damaged it, yet if it were repaired~ the County would h~ve to dc so and the only money available was from Highway Funds_ Mr. Hedrick ~tatsd Federal monies fund the railroad and the Highway Department and that it is all taken from the same total funding. Mr. Rooks, an that might be true~ but i% was being taken from the County's highway monies for road improvements. Mm. Williams indies=ed that fire engines cannot traverse this bridge because of the weight limitations which cause~ a delay in response time to some areas of the County during emergency situations. After further discussion of thin ~tsr, on motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: whereas, The maintenance of the Buford Road bridge structure over Hhe Southern Railroad tracks in ~on Air is a current Whereas, ~he current condition of the structure reqnirE~ Weight limit which prohibits fire engines; and Whereas, ~ire engine routes bypassing the Buford Roa~ brldpe as a result of weight limitations ere longer than necessary and constitute unnecessary delay in providing emergency s~rvices; and Whereas~ The need fur replacement of the B~ford Read bridge Wherea~, Southern Railroad previously has refused 82-20~ New, Therefore, Be It Re~olved that the Chesterrzeld County Board of Supervisors finds that the refusal o£ Southern Railroad to provide a o0ntribution to reconstruction cf the Buford Roa~ bridge does net reflect a responsible attitude un the Dart of an imporlant member of the business c~mmunity and provider of services to the general public7 and Purther Be It Resolved that the Chesterfield County hoard of Supervisors hereby requests Southern ~ailroad to rec©nsidsr %heir position re~ardin~ contribution to r~construc~lon Of the Buford Aced bridge over Southern Railroad. Vole: Unanimous ~r. O'Neill stated that he did not understand hew the Eanes and River ~%oad projee~ was listed in tko prans for th~ budget as there were other projects which he felt more important but indicated he would accept the Highway Department and staff's recoznnendation. There being no further discussion, it was on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved ~hat the Board hereby approves the 19~2-~3 budget for the Secondary System with improvements as indisated on the papers filed with this meeting which budget is in %he amount of $1,690,207. Vote: Unanimous ~r. William~ presented the Board with reports on the Rural Addition ~rogram~ th~ Revenue Sharing ~zegram end the Recreational and Industrial Access Projects. Fir. Williams stated that if the Board w~e interested in constructing Courthouse Road B×tende~, Rural A~diticn fund~ c~uld bs utilized. He stated tko project wa~ anticipated to cost a~proximatel¥ $330~000 and that ther~ is $145,000 in Rural Addition Funds available at this time which Could be applied kO the project. He stated that there will be $225,000 available as cf July 1, 19R3 and that ~ith s School Board contribution of approximately $50-6Q~000~ the project could be completed. He ~tated County forces could rent equipment and accomplish ~ome cf the work for drainage. Mr. Bodd stated that the Oak Lawn Street prelect could not be delayed as it was necessary at this time. He se~te~ the East Avenue project could be delayed if it were the desire of the Board. Mr. Williams stated %hat another alternative was to use Revenue Sharing Funds, but by doing ~n~ the County would lose the State matching funds. ~r. Bookman stated hs felt with the economy am it is today~ Courthouse Road Extended could be completed at a' cost o£ approximately $200,00Q. He suggested taking the remainlng Rural Addition ~und~ and dividing the revenue sharing f~nds up evenly between districts for the ~emaining portion of the County'm share. Mr. Daniel stated ke was not convinced ~hat Courthouse Road Extended was the ~o~t pressing need in the COunty at this time. ~r. ~ookman indicated th~ congestion which would be eliminated at Route I0 and ~rause Road and the fuel fnnds which woul~ be saved by the School System as well as ~tility personnel, etc. by constructing this extension. Mr. Hedrick stated that a report ha~ been prepared which indlca=ed that $33,000 in fuel co,ts could ~e save~ if this extension were completed. ~r~. Gircne stated she felt this project needed to be accomplished. Mr. Daniel seated he felt there were more pressing needs in the County, for example, the inter~ecti0n of Heukics and Ckippenham. Mr. Dodd suggested the use of the balance c~ the contingency account. Hr. O'Neill stated the use of rural addition funds for Courthouse Road Extended would be to serve County facilities end no% County residents as it was originally proposed to dc. $2-20~ ~ddition funds ware because people were allowed to build on private roads. Mrs. Girone inquired if the Board of Zoning Appeals had plans to prevent such development in the County in the future. Mr, Balderscn indicated staff w~¥ working on a report to brinV to the Board of Supervisors in the near future dealing with this subject. Mr. O~M~ill requested staff to pre,are additional information o~ Ciavpoint Road. Mr Hmdriok ~tated that the usa of contingency funds may no~ be appro~r~at~ at this time as the construction cost of $60,800 for the Point of Rocks Bark ~oad which was to b~ paid by the virginia DeDartment Qg ~ighways and Transportation may not be forthcoming and those funds may be needed for this project, Mr. Dankel suggested that all the information be r~viewed and compiled and submitted to the Board for further discusslen. Mr. Hedrick stated that he did not race--end the use of Re~enu~ Sharing Funds for Courthouse Road E×tend~d as th~ County will not receive its matching funds. Mr, ~ee stated a decision was necessary as to ~chich Revenue Sharing projects were to be approved for resurfacin~, as he must schedule them with the contractor. The ~oard advised Mr. C~ to schedule for plant mix 9~oodpecker R~ad and L~ordon Drive and that furthe~ consideration of the rema£n~g projects would be discussed later in th~ day. On motion of ~. oodd~ seconded by M~. Daniel, the Board approved the installation of street light~ at the follow~ng locations with the fun~s to be expended from th~ Street Light Fund~: ws~tweod Street and West Strathmore Road, $136. 2. Wen~w©rth Street an~ ~est Strathmore Road~ $213. 3. Brentwood Circle and Ruthmore Road~ $111. 2937 BensLey Road, $110, 6800 Wentworth street, Vote: Unanimous O~ motion of Mr~ Dodd, ~econded by Mr. Daniel, the Board authorized the Chairman of th~ Board of Supervisors to execute an agreement giving license with reversionary provisions to make the Old Jail available to the County Museu~ Comr~itte~ with the understandinU that this facXlit~ will bs restored and u~ed in conjunction with the CO~aty Museum. And further be i~ resolved that the County will maintain the Old Jail in the ~ame manner as the County Mueeum. vote: Unanimous Mr. John R, Bobertaon, Chairmen of the Museu~ Committee, ~resenh and thanked ~he Board for the Old Jail facility. He stated that it was their intention to refnrblsh %he facility and perhap~ have an office for the Historical Society who ha~ to h~Zp with the refurbishing. Mr. ~edrick advised the Board ther~ m~y be reguest~ forthcoming for financial assistance for this r~toration. gr. O~Neill ~cusad himself from the m~eting. 82-202 4r. Gee advised the Board that th~ ROUte 360 bridge should be :ompleted by ~uly 1, l~ag! that the intersection of R©utc 150 and ~oute 10 should be completed by September 1, 1982 but that it ~hould be ©pen to traffic in August; that th~ Roek~ood Park )rn]ect is basisally complete at this time but it has not been ~cc~pted into the STate Yvstem but will be in the near £utur®; ~hat the B~llwood Road project has started and is On schedule; ~hat the Salem Church Road project had b@sn bi~ and Shoosmith was ow bi~d~r in the amount cf $~20~000 and it should be awarded in ~he near future and begin improvements on July 1, 1982; an~ that ~he bid~ on Hugueno~ Park were being opened t~day and should )egin construction in the oea~ future with a completion o~ July tr. Gee stated that the ~ubllc hearing for restr~ct±ng truck ~raffic on Osborne Road wa~ set for July 14, 1952 at the Chester ~resby~rian Church; that the traffic study for Rout~ 6Q at the respital~ Research Road and S0uthlake Boulevard had been :ompleted an~ it indicates one or more l~i_~hts are needed; that ~he traffic study is being done on Ironga%~-q3~'i%~e and the speed ~ill be reduce~ but t~ey have not determined what it will b~. lt, Daniel informed Mr. ~ee that n day care center will be in :hat area as well which should be haken into consideration. ~n what wa~ being done for IrOngate. Mr. Gee stated that the ~he intersection of Elkherdt and ~uth~rs had b~en aesomplished ~e sta~ed potholes on the other roads will be repaired as ~osslbla. ~r. Dodd stated that he did not un~sr~tand how Mr. Gee ~ccomplished as mu~h as he did with th~ fun41ng received. Mr. ~e indicated that he did net do all the ~ork, others were involved. ~r. Daniel thanke~ the Highway Department for r~suzfacing and %et of the grsde which is r~quired and ~ome of the stone is uomln~ up but the contractor will have to improve som~ of 4rs. Giron~ and Mr. Dodd indicated they h~d dlscuszed their road ~rublsms with Mr. Gee previously. ~r. Gee stated th~ portion ~rom the bridge to Be~ley was on ~eed it as badly. Mr. B©oknan inquired if the resurfacing could ln~tead of that sche~ule~. Mr. Gee stated the portion of the ~r. ~ookman inquired if Newbys Bridg~ Roa~ could be resurfsced if .ndicated it could. b. Gee stated it weul~ b~ improved. ~h~ date of June 23, 1982 at 10:00 a.m. £or a public hearing 82-203 %.~ 2. ll.B. 2. 10_B. It wa~ generally agreed to defer consideration of the precinct lines to later in the day. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bo©kment the Board made the following changes to the school System budget: 1. Decreased Planned Budget Expenditure account 141-1-2%500-33tl Fuel and increased Planned Budget Expenditure account 141-1-2I~00-2941 Tuition Paid Other Divisions hv $150,000. 2. Increased Planned ~udget Revenue aCCount 141-1-00012-0966 Preschool Incentive ~rant "B" by $1~,920 and increased 141-1-22392~000Q PRESCHOOL INCENTIVE ~RANT t41-1-22392-1190 Aide's S~lary (PT} 141-1-2~392-2151 Consultant Services 141-1~22392-237~ Conferences, Bemlnars, 141-1-~2392-2907 In-service Training 141 1-223~2-29~1 Tuition 141-1-223~2-34~2 In,Emotional Supplies 141-1-22392-~513 0~her E~ipment Vote: Unnnimoas 150.00 700.00 l~000.O0 2~400.00 ~,770.00 4,~OO.O0 appropriated $8,000 from the Clover ~ill District 3d Road Funds to double seal Warbro Road from the landfill entrance to Genito Road. Mr. Bookman stated he hoped better enfozeement of the larg~ trucks on thi~ road would be ~ccomplished because it was their weight which has caused the deterioration of th~ read. Mr. Kowell stated enforcement should no~ crsate e problem in the future. On motion ef the Board, th~ County Treamurer is hereby authorized ho advanse funds from the General Fund ho the Garage Construction Project not to exceed $1tO00~OOO un~il mcmpletion of th~ prelect at which time the General R~nd will bs reimbursed from t~ lee~e Mrs. Dorothy Meldrum of the Electoral Board staled the Registrar's Office had prepared the requested information regarding precinct changes in th~ Dale and Matoaca Districts, She stated the~ ~he Grace Brethren Church on Cr~nbeck was available and that St. Luke's Church in M~nckester was ~vailable_ Hr. Bookn~an suggested calling the new precinct in south Manchagf~r~ St. Luke's Precinct. Mrs. Meldrum stated there wa~ e problem with %he Providence-bari9 Precinct~ as the County Attorney indicated ~maginary boundaries may not pass the State. Mr. Bookman requested that Irvindale Subdivision and if possible the Markhaven area be included in th~ Providence Presinct. Mrs. Maldrum stated the additional precinct in Natoaca could be called Pocahontas. Mr. O'Neill indicated that was agreeable. Mrs. M~ldrum stated they h~d tried to obtain the Zethodist Church in 82-204 ~' 13. Ches=er and ic still might be available ~or South Chester. She stated there were no 9roble~ with the ~lls, B~ch and Wint~rpock Precincts. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board authorized the orcinance ~hangi~g the voting precincts June 23, 19S2. Vute= Unanimous Mrs. ~ldrum stated that ten new machines were needed and that the Registrar could act now, $45.00 per machine would b~ saved. 0~ motion cf Mr. Book~an~ Seconded bV Zr. Daniel, the Board authorixed tk~ County Administrator to transfer funds from th~ Contingency account, if needed, to the Registrar for p~rchase of vo~ing machines in an ~mount not to e~ceed $20,000. Vote: Unanimous On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by ~r. ~ookman, the Bosrd authorized the Department of Social ~ur~ices to reque$~ from =he Virginia ~ousing Development Authority, Section 8 Housing units to be u~ilized for moderately retarded adults in conjunction and cooperation with the Chesqerfield Men,al Retardation S~r~ic~s and further that ~ request al~o be made for additional units under thi~ program for qualifying low ~ncome f~d~illes which will be at no cc~t to the Oounty. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Daniel e~oused him~elf from the meeting r~garding appointments as he understood a person might be appointed which may be a business client of his wife's in her accounting ibu~iness in order to eliminate any possible conflict of 'interest. Mr. H~drick advised the Board of outstanding appointments. }~. Bookman and Mr. DOdd indicated they both had names for appointment to the Personnel Appeals Board. It wa~ generally aq~eed that this mat%er wo~l~ be deferred until later in the day. ~r. Daniel returned to the On motion cf Mr. Dedd, seconded by ~kr. Bookman, th~ Board: 1. Appointed M~. Wendell Cheatham, Jr. to the M~ntal ~ealth/Mental Retarder±on Community Services Board whose term would be u£fective u~o~ the resignation date of Mr. Linweed Carroll and whose term would expire on December 31, 1982, representing Bermuda District. 2. Appointed Mr. Mark Clark to the ~outh Services Commission whose term would be effective immediately and would expire on Jun~ 30, 1~, representing ~ermuda District. 3. Appointed F~. Albert Livingston to the Transportation Safety Commission representing Bermuda District, whose effective ir~mediately and is at ~h~ pleasure of th~ This day the CoUnty Environmental ~nqineer, in accordance with dir~uticns from this Board, made report in writing upon examinatien of Southlaks Boulevar~ and ~esearch Road, in Suutkpor=, Section 2, Clover Hill Disfrict. 82-205 © 14.C. 15.g.1. ~econd~d by Mr. Dodd, it is resolved that Southlake Boulevard and Research Road in So~thport, Section 2, Clover Hill District, be ~nd they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that th~ Virginia Department of {ighways and Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to ~ake into the Secondary Sy~tem~ gouthlake Boulevard, beginning at Lis intersection with Branchwav Road, State Route 645, extending ~a$~ .32 mile to the intersection Of Research Road, th~n east Rile to tie into existing Seu~hlake Boulevard, State Route 1789; lesearch Road, beginning at its intersection with Southlake {oulevard, e×t~nding .07 mile north to tie into mxisting Research ]ndustrial Park. And be it further reselved~ that the Board of Supervisors ~arante~s to the Virginia Department of Highways a 60 ft_ ~ight-of-way for Research toad; except Southlake ~her~by we guarantee a variabl~ 60 ft. tO ~O ~t. right-of-way. ~his section of Southport is recorded as :action 2, Plat Book 35, Pages 17 and 19, November ~6, 1979. Dn motion o~ ~r. Bookman, ~eoonded by ~=. DodO, the Board ~pproved and authorized th~ County Administrator ~o execute an ~ssignment agreement b~twe~n Central DieSel, Inc., Commercial ~redl% Business Luaus ~nd Chesterfield County, a espy of which is ~iled with th~ paper~ Qf this ~oard. kDprOved and authorized the County Administrator %o execute any ~ecessary documents ~or Anchor Fence ©f Richmond who submitted-' ~he low bid of $1,92~ for construction of a chain link outfield ~ence for Chalkley Elementary School Bron~o field which funds are )n motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by M~. Dodd, the Board ~uthorised the County Administrator to ~elete ~rcm Bond Funds ~1,0~ estimated expenditure for fertiliz~r and =ced at ~rovidence Middle School and transfer this amount to Chalkley ~l~mentary for seed and fertilizer. This $1,~0~ is a credit :aksn on thi~ project in exchange for =he Parks and Recreation )epartmen~ actually performing f~ztilizing and seeding for the ir. Painter presented the Board with the water an~ sewer !inancial reports. In motion o~ Mr_ Bookman, seconded by Mr. uodd, the Board ~pproved the request from Granhall Enterpriuas for an e~t~n~iun i~ ti~e cf %he refund prevision for ConTract W76-45CD, P~nnwood iubdivision, until May 3I, 1983, and authorized the County ~dministfator to ~x~cute any necessary dooumsnts. 15_B.2. 15.C.2. ~.5 .D. In motion oX Mrs. Gironer seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Board .pproved and ~uthorizsd the COunty Administrator to e~eOu%~ any .eoessary documents for Vi=ginia Pipe and Supply Comuany, Inc. 'ho submitted tbs low bid in the amount of $24,928.00 for :ontract W82-~2D/6(s)2420, relocation of water line due tO ~on~truction of the entrance for Huguenot Park. n motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the ~oard pproved end authorized th~ County A~minlstrator to execute any ecessary documents for Richard L. Crowder Construction Company n~. who submitted the Iow bid of $43,631.B9 for Contract 81-9~C/?(8)194I, Little Tomahawk Creek Force Main S~wer, and urther the Board transferred S47,994.99 from 380-1-70871-4393, omahawk Pumping Station to 380-I-71941-439~, Little Tomahawk orca Main. Unanimous n motion of ~r. Daniel, ~econded by Mr. Bookmant the Board pprov~d and au~korlmed ~h~ County Administrator to ex, cute any ~cessary documents for B=ut Backhoe ~ ~xcavating, Inc. who sbmitted the low bid of $21t555.02 for Contract :Sl-PQC/7(8)1901, installation of ganltary sewer to serve eight tomes on Lake Bills Drive. 'ote: Unanim0~$ tr. Eedriek slated discus~io~ regarding Dartic~paticn in Onstructien of access road to Timsbury Sewage Bumpi~g Station ad been %¢ithdrawn from the A~enda. r. Bookman s~eZed he would like the Board te accept the e=nteroffer of Loraine T. Minetres in the smount of $2,0~ in dditlon to having a Nursery rslecate thr~e ~Qcwced trees for e ewer easement along Flkhart Read. M~~. O'Neill crated h~ felt his would be set:lng a precedent. Mr. Barmen Stated that Mrs. inetree was agreeable to ~he County drainage Crew r~lcGa~ing her roes. kfter further discummion, it was on motion of Mr. co,man, Seconded by Mrs. Girone, ~esolved that the Beard accept counteroffer from Loraine T. ~inetree in ~he amount of $2~000 los the ~elocati~n of three do.q~ood trees by County staff in onjunction with sewer project S80-133C.3, Irvindele, pproved the following adjustment el-appropriations: $4,039.07 from 3g0=1-71382-4393 to 574 Fund Balance. This S81-85C - Rout~ 150 an~ Jahnke Koad Sewers. Unappropriated $4,409.g0 from 3~0-1-71851-4393 to 574 Fund Balance. This Unanimous motion o~ Mrs. Girene, ~conded by Mr. Daniel, the Board the foilewlng sewer contract and authorized tko County ]minis:rater to execute any necessary documents~ $~-17CD/7{8)2172 - Cotoniat Heights A~semblv of God Churck en Harrowgate Road eveloper: Colonial Heights Assembly ef God Church on~ractOr: Piodmon~ Construction Co., In~. otai Construction Coat: $10,424.00 County Cost: ~74-1-11781-7221 Unanlm~us 90Q~00 - R~f~nd from co~Kection for offsite sewers )n mo~ion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Beard ~DrOved and authorized ~he CQ~n~y Administrator to ~x~cute an ~ndsrgreund service agreement with Virginia ~lectrlc and Power ~Ompany for service to ~he Courthouse water tank. ~te: Unanimou~ )n motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by ~. Daniel~ [he Board ,shelf of %he Ceunty, a variable width strip o£ land along Bu~Qrd ~oad eh Buf~rd Court from Corporate ~ills Associates. )n motion o~ Mrs. Girone, ~eQDded by Mr. Daniel, the Board pproved and authorized the Chairman and COnnty Adminis%raaor %e :xecute any necessary doeumen%s fox the vacation and rededication ,f a 20 foot easement acro~ the property of Brandermill for tbs 'elocation of the Little Tomahawk Creek Tz~nk Se%;er~ Contract ,n motion ef Firs. sirens, ascended by Mr. Daniel, the Board pproved and authorized the Chairman of the Board to execute an greemen~ and deed of ingress and egress between %he County, inerick Aseoclates; COlonial Twen:y-~wo Amsooiate~ and Corporate ills ASsociates for Lhe d~velopmsnt of the Buford Road Fi~e tation, a copy of which is filed with the paperm of this Board. O%e: Unanimous r. Painter presented thc Board with a list Qf developer water nd Sewer contracts executed by the County Administrator. r. Hedrick presented the Board with a report on Courthouse Road xtension. he Board roo~ssed to travel to lunch a~ the Chesterfield Connty irpor~ Conference Room for which time a work s~ssion on the reposed 1982-83 budget was scheduled. r. Hedge presented a list Of revisions te ~h~ proposed budget. rs. ¢irene stated her support for restoration of funds for- ompool and that this would De tke last year of County articipa%ion in this program. Mr. Hedrick stated that the 6~000 for summer basketball would serve only about 200 high ckool players. Mr. Bookman s%at~d that th~ high ~chool ccanh~s ad made clear their ~uppert for the program. Mr. Daniel stated hat th~ program ehonld be open to all youth, no~ just high ~hcol team p~syers. Mr. Maaden stated that h~ would work wi:h he coaches to seek their agreement on making the ~rogram open to 11 youth. 82-Z~8 17. Mr. ~edrick stated that th~ staff would llka to discuss landfills in a ~{orkshep. Mr. Bookman stated that he thought the landfill issue had been re~olvad. Mr, H~rick stated that the Board had asked staff to examine and report on the Tri-Citias' and United Biofuela' proposals. Mr~ O'Neill stated he WOuld like to see reports on tko proposals. Funding for three positions in COmmunity Development was discussed briefly. Mr. Dodd stated he could support the proposed budget if new position~ were frozen. Mr, ~edzick stated that he could take administrative action to freeze positions. Mr. Kedrick stated that the revisions a~ proposed ~y st~ff would not have any net effect on the fund balance. The Boar~ recessed to travel to the CourthOuse for the regularly scheduled agenda. On motion of the ~oard, the Board adopted the the amount of $154,791,2~. The Board b~ing poll~d~ Mr. O'Neill ~ Aye ~rs. ~i~on~ - Aye Mr. Bookman - Mr. Daniel - Aye Ftc. Dodd - On a motion of the ~oard it is hereby r~olved that the following amounts b~ appropriated to the designated funds and aGcounts from departments, other agencies and nOs-departmental aooount~ for- fiscal year ~mneraI Fund Estimate~ Revenue: Frcm Local ~OUrO~S O~her LeGal Taxes Fines & Forfeitures Rents & Intmrest Service Charges Sales & Services Miscellaneous ~rom O~her Agencies Stat~ Federal & Other Localities Transfer from 1977 County Bond Fund 331 Anticipated Fund Balance 7/1/82 Appropriations: board of Supervisors County Adminis~rator'~ Office Document Processing Economic Development General Services Data P~osessing Accounting and Budqet County Attorney ~nternal Audit $ 51,731,600 13,300,000 t,3Q1,500 340,00o I~192,S00 69,900 16,097~827 105~000 150,000 90,000 3,~19,286 $ 93r700 63,400 277,700 332,500 705,500 1~1,100 112,900 82-209 Purchasing Collection and Disbursement cf Circuit Court & Clerk'm Officn District Court~ Commonwealth's Attorney Police Department Sheriff and Jail Fire Department Civil Defens~ ~mer~ency Medical Servic~ Safety Animal Control County Social Service Programs ~ealth Mental Health & Mental R~tardation Juvenile Detention Home Probation Community ~evelepment Building Inspection Solid Waste Service Elections Library Employee WelfaFe Capital Debt ~ervlca Appropriation School Operatln~ Fund ~stimated Revenue: State Fe4eral Local Transfer - G~neral Fun~ Transfer = Revenue ~haring Appropriatione~ Administration Instruction Regular Day School Pupil Transportation Food Service Ope.etlon and Maintenance of School Plant Fixed Charges Summer $ckuo! Adult Education Other Fduca%ienal Proqramu Debt Service Capital out~ay TOtal School Operating Pun~ Revenue Sherinq Fun~ Estimated Revenue: From the Federal Government Intereet on Bank DeDesits Anticipated Fund Salance 7/1/82 ~2-210 82~,300 51,100 268,~00 6,421,800 1,939,400 5,446.700 7.200 48,0~0 36,200 417,~00 221.500 626,500 561~50O 13,900 t09,300 ~63,600 507~400 70~,200 894.~00 94,600 188~800 I~414,800 97,800 45,000 1~436,80~ 1,603,700 693~300 538,00~ 100,000 1.~68,700 5,500 47,~07,~00 229t135 $ S9,516,098 $ 31,501,~88 1,985,563 4,220,325 ~7,367,200 $ 86,632,775 1.0~0~$29 45~549~925 3,77~.7S0 3,675,210 9,928,709 12~778,823 420,096 6,989,830 $ 86,63~,776 $ 1.657,666 50.000 110r!34 Total Rsven~e ~propriations: Transfers to Schools Total R~venu~ ~harin~ Fund 1977 County Bond Fund ~ond Inter~t Total Revenue ®propr~a~ions: Debt Service - County Total 2977 County Bond Fund Countv Vehicle Maintenance Sales %Dpropriations: Two-Way Radio Total County Vehicle Malnt~nance County Airport Fund Sales Total Revenue Airport Fund Balance 6/30/~3 Total County Airport Fnnd ~propriations: Fund Balance 6/30/83 Total County Nursin~ Home Fund ~propriations: Transfer~ Water Oper~tin~ Fund ppropriationm: Water Operatinq 82-211 1~817,800 260,500 1,557,80D t,817~800 90,000 $ ~0,000 90~000 $ 90,000 1,521,300 1,521,~00 123,300 $ $ 603,200 106,800 140,000 $ 850,000 $ 846,400 ~,600 $ .... ~50,000 $ g,200,700 $ 4,200,700 4,168,500 32,200 $ 4,~71,000 $ 4,871,000 $ 4,871,~00 ~ 3,567,B60 60~000 $ 3¢$44,000 $ 3,~44,000 Total Water O~ratln~ Fund S 3,6~4~000 Water Debt Service Fund Estimated Revenue: interes~ on Bank DeDosit$ & Investments $ 70,000 Transfer from Water Revenue 743,395 Total Revenue $' 813,395 Debt Service $ 813,395 Total Water Deb~ Service Fund $" 913,395 Anticipated Fund Balance 7/1/$2 ADpropriat~ns: Transfe~ Capital PrOjucts Fund Balance Anticipated Fund Balanc~ Total Revenue $ Appropriations: Fun~ ~alance 6/30/8~ ~ervice Charge~ $ A~ticipet~d Fund Balancu Total Revenue $' Appropriations: Water B~nd Construction Fund General & Administrative Fund Balance 6/30/83 ~stimated ~evenue~ S~wer Service Charges Anticipate~ Fund Balance 7/1/82 $ 223,000 40,000 560,04S 3,100,000 $ 555~000 3,295,400 $ 7~,645 3~923,045 50,000 ~61,O00 1,800,~00 2,~11~000 672~200 1,6B8,800 2,311,000 409,900 25,000 434,900 434,900 434,900 10,~00 10,~00 2,800 7,200 I0,00o 313,000 5,599,000 1,680~000 64,200 525,000 82-212 Sower Operating Sewer Debt Sewer ImDrovement Sewer Bond Construction Transfer to Capital Projects Fund Balance 6/30/53 Total S~er Fund Utility CaDital Projects Zstimated Revenue: Wate~ Improvement Sower Fund %ppfupriations: Capital Improvements Total Utility Capital Projects it further resolved: $ 8,181,200 $ 3,077;500 2,312~643 1,080,300 2,800 ~82,857 $ g,18t,200 $ 3~295~400 $25,000 $ 4,120,400 $ 4,120,40D $ ~,I20~400 That the County Administrator may authorize the transfer cf any unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one classification of expenditure to another withi~ the ~m~ department or agency. That the County Administrator Isay fransfer up to $5,000 from the unencumbered balance of the appropriation of on~ department or agency te another department or agency, including the contingency account encompassed in the Non-D~partmentaI appropriation. NO more than one [ransf~r may b~ made for the same item causin~ the need for a transfer. That tho County Administrator may increase appropriations for the rolls,in9 items of non-budgeted revenue that may occur during th~ fiscal year. vehicles or o~har property ~cr which County funds which the County has expende~ funds directly re%at~d to that r~fund or rmimbursement. That all outstanding encumbrances, bott operating and capital, at June 30, 19~ arc reapprouriated to the 1982-83 fiscal year ~ered in the previous year. ~hat appIopriations desiqcate~ for capital projects will not lapse at %he end of the fieca! voar but shall remain appropri- ations until aha completion of the project or until the Board ~f Supervisors, by appropriate resolution, changes or elimi- nates tho =ppropriation, Unencumbered balances remaining after ~ompletion of a capital project will rovert to the fund balance )f ~he fund which provided financing for the capital project. Fhis section applies to appropriations ~cr Capital Projects at Iune ~O, 19S2 and appropriations in the 1982-23 budget. ~hat the approval by the ]card of Supervisors Of any grant of ~unds to the County constitutes the approD~iation of both the 'avenue to be received from the grant and the County's ex, audi- :ute r~quired by the terms of the grant, if any. And further ~hat the appropriation of grant fund~ will not lap~ at the end Df the fiscal year, but shall remain approprlate4 until comple- :ion of the project or until th~ Board of Supervisors, by ~ppr~priate resolution, changes er eliminates the apuropri- ~tion. Upon completion of a grant project, staff is authorized 'o close out the grant and transfer back to the fuDding source ~2-213 .18 · any remaining balances. This applies to apprcpriation~ fur grant~ outstanding at Juno 3Q, I982 ~nd appropriations in the At ~he close Of the fiscal year, all unencumbered appropri- ati0ns for budge~ items othe~ than Capital ~rojec~s grants, and donations shall rev%rt to the Fund Balance Available fur Appropriation of the fund in which they are included. Thaf the County Administrator may appropriate both revenue and expsnditure for donations made by citizens er citizen groups in support of County programs and %hat any remaining unencun~e~ed balance at fha en~ of the fiscal year will be reappropriated into the subsequent fiscal year. That the Treasurer is authorized to make transfsr~ to the various funds for which there are transfers bu~gote~ not to ~xsood the amounts budgeted. She shall transfer funds only as needed or in accordance with any exieting bond resolutions that specify the manner in which transfers ars ~o be made. That ~he Treasurer may advance merles to and from the various funds of th~ County to allow ma×imu~ cash flaw efficiency. The advances must no~ v~olate county bond covenants or othe~ legal r~strichion~ that would prohibit an advance~ That th~ County Adminfstrator is authorlz~d to make ~ayments for the £ollowinq Trust ~ kgencv Funds ~or the Specified rsasonn for which the funds Ware established. In ne case shall the expendifur~ ~xceed the available balance in tho fund: a. County Workmen's Compensation Fund b. Nursing Mome Patient'~ Fund c. M.W. Burn,f% ~mployee Award Fund d. stub Road Depo¢it Fund e. Utility Fire Insurance Fund f- Qtili~y Liability InSuranc~ Re~erve Fund g. Drainage Distric~ Fund h. Spec/al Welfare Fund i. T_ F. Jeffress Me~orial Fund The Board being ~olled: Hr. O~Neill ~ Aye Mss. Gircnn - Aye Mr. Bookman - Aye Mr. Daniel - Aye Mr. Dedd - Aye Mr. Hedrick stated this budget as adopt~d keep~ tho landfill rates as they currently exist. He state~ the Board would be having a wor~ session ~n the near future on this issue. ~2S062 In ~rmuda Magisterial District, Willie I. Getting~ requested e Mobile ~o~e Permit to park a mobile home on property which belongs to Franas Gabbings, wife of the applicsnt. Tax Map 68-13 (~) ~ellwood Estates, Lot 103 an~ in tko vicinity of Gresham Avenue (Sheet Mrs. Gabbings was present. Mr. Dodd inquired if the applicant planned to lscate the mobile home on a temporary cr permanent basis. Mrs. Get:ings indicated it would be permanent. There was no opposition present. On motion ef Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Beard approved this Soqu~st for a period of five years sub,ecl Lo the following standard conditions: 1. The applicant must be the owner and occupant of the mobile home. 82-214 mobile home ~it~, nor shall eny moblie home be used for rental premertv, ertl? one {1) mobile homo shall be permitted to be parked on an individual lot em parcel. The ~ieimum lot size, yar~ setbacks, required front yard, and ether zoning requirements of the applicable zoning district shall be complied with, except that no mobile home shall be located closer than 20 feet to any existing 4. No additional permanent-type living space ma~ be added onto a mobile home. All mobile homes shall be skirted but goods and artiels~ shall not be stored ~ndern~ath the mobile home. ~ere public (county) watex and/or sewer are available~ ~hey shall Be used. 6. Upon b~ing ~ranted a permit for a mobile hem~, th~ applicant must then obtain tho necessary pe~its ~rem the Building Inspector's Offico~ This must be done prior ~o the inst~llation or rs!©cation of the unit. 7. Any violation of the above conditions shall be grounds for Vote: Unanimous 82S063 In Hat©ace ~aqi~%orial District, Shirley R~ ROgers requested a mobile home permit to park a mobile home oa pr©party which she Owns. ~ax ~%ap 1~-6 (2) Pineiand, Lot 2A-2 and b~tter known as 3121 Pineland Avenue (Shes% ~9). Mr. Rogers ~as present and skated ~hi~ was for an ex~eting trailer. Hr. Douglas Patterson was present and inquired if a house and trailer could be on a glng%e ~eptic tank. Mr. Rogers stated he had two ~eptio tg~ks and one well SyStem. ~r. sookman indicated he did not Stink the law required two this matter. On motion of Hr. O~Neill, so=onded bi, ~r. DodO, the Board approved this request for a period of. ~ive years subject to the following standard conditions: 1. The applicant must be the owner an~ occupant of the ~obile 2. No lo% or parcel may be rented or leased for us~ as a ~obile home sit~, nor ~hall any mobile home be used for rental property. Only on~ (1) mobile hem~ shall be permitted to be pa~ked on an individual lot or parcel. 3. The ~inimum lo% size, yard setbacks, required front yard, and other zoning requirements of the applicable zo~in~ district shall be complied with, except that no mobile home shall be located closer than 20 feet to any existing 4. ~o additional permanent-type living space may be added onto a mobile home. Ail mobile homes shall be skirted but mobile home. ~. Where public (County] water and/or ~ewer are available, they shall bm used_ Upon being granted e p~rmit for s mobile home, the applicant must then obtain the necessary permits from ~he ~2-215 Building znspector's Office. This must be dome prior to the ingtal!ation or relocation 0% the unit. Any violation cf the above conditions shall b~ groundg for revocation of a mobile home p~rmit for a mobile kome. Unanimous 2n Bermuda Ma~isteriaI District, Raymond and Alma Bpellman ~equested a mobile home permit tO park a mobile home on >roperty whick belongs to Howard L. Atkinmon, 3r., son-ln-law Of the &pplican%. Tax Map 67-4 (2) Patterson Park, Block Lots 32 through 36 and bet~r known as 2511 ~Ierriewood Road I~heet ~r. A~kin~en was present and stated thet thi~ r~que~t was for his wife~ parents. Tkere wzs no opposition present. Mr. Saldereon stated that on~ le~t~r of oppoeition fro~ an adjacent property owneu had been received. On motion of Mr. Dodd~ ~eeended by Mr. Daniel, the Board approved this recuest for period of five year~ subjec~ to ~he fo%lowing Dtandard ~ondi%ions: 1. The applicant must be the owner end OCCupant of the mobile homo. mobile homm $1te, nor shall any mobile hom~ be used for rental property. Only one (i) mobile home shall be permitted to be parked on an individual lot or parcel, district sh~ll b~ compllsd with~ except that no mobile No additional permanentatype living space may be mobile home. Where public (County) water and/or sewe~ are available, they shnll be used. the installation or relocation of tko unit. Any violation of the above conditions shall be grounds for :zs0o5 in Mi~lothien Magisterial District~ Jay Rowe and Ji~ Sowers equ~ted an a~en~ment to a previously granted Conditional Use Case ~78S057) %o p~rmit the exi~tin~ single family d~lling ,s converted for o~flce use and a Conditional Ume Planned ,evelopmen~ to per~i~ an exception to the pavin~ requirement On 1.0 acre parcel fronting .~ppr©ximately 210 feet on erthw~st lin~ of Nortk Providence Road ~easured from a point pproximately 10~ feet northeast of its intersection with winridqe Lane ~nd b~tter known as 208 North Providenc~ koa~. ax Map 18-15 (1) Parcel 18 82-216 Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission had recommended approval of this request subject to certain conditions_ MSS. Girone inquired i~ the conditions were acceptable, specifically #2. Mr. Rowe wee present and stated the conditions were acceptable. There wa~ ne oppesitlon present. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr, Oodd~ the Board appsoved this ~equsst subject to the following conditions: 1. This Conditional Use ~lanned Development shall be granted to and for Jay Rowe and Jim Sewer~ and shall not be transferable, nor ru~ with the lend. 2. This Conditional Us9 Planned Davelepment shall ba qranted until April 30, i~SS. Upon expiration of the permit, the e×istin~ single family dwsllln~ shall ba vacated and original approved ~aStar plan shall govern development until an altsrnative sits plan for the entire parcel is approved by the Board of Supervisors. All parking areas shall be graveled with a minimum cf four (4) to six {6) inches of select material numbers 2G e~ 2~A and maintained se as to p~ovide safe in,ross and for thos~ utilizing the property. Pa~king areas and driveways ~hall b~ defined by a durable means (i.~., Other than normal maintenanee~ there ~hall b~ nQ additions this use. 5. There shall be no outside storag~ of any buil~ing materials or supplies. 6. Other than the ar~a required for parking end driveways, there shall be nc clearing of the property to this use. 7. The above stated conditions notwithstanding, all bulk reuuiraments Of the Office Business {O} District shall be applicable. 8. ~hu above stat~ conditions notwithstanding, %h~ site pla~ submitted with the application shall be considered the master ~lan, In conjunctieu with the approval of this request, the Co:r~issien shall grant schematic plan approval o~ the site plan ~uhmitte~ with the application. Vote: UnanimOUS In Bermuda ~agisterial District, Albar Really, Inc. requested rezcning ~rem COnvenienCe Business (B-l) to General Busine~ ($-3) of a .469 aero parcel ~ronting approximately 110 feet on the south line of %Fest ~undred ~oad and located approximately 75 fee~ west of its intersection ~ith Petersburg Street. Tax Map 115-7 [2] Chester, Block Q2, Part of Lot~ 413r 413 B and Mr. Belderson mtated the Planning Commission had recommended denial of this r~quest. There was no one present r~presenting the applicant. It was generally agreed that this w~uld be deferred until later in the ~tS146 In Dale Magisterial District, J. Louis R~ynolds requested rezeninq from Agricultural (A) to Kesidential Townhouse-Fer-Sals (R-TH} of 39.8 acres; to Residential 82-217 of 53.5 acres; and to Residential (R-15) of 49.9 acres plus a Conditional USe Planned Development encompassing the entir~ t37.2 acre tract. This property fronts approximately 2800 feet cn the north line of Chippenham Parkway, al~o fronting approx£mataly 2150 feat an the aast line of Dalebroak Drive and approximately 16~O fe~t on the ~eath line of Cogbii1 Road. Tax Map ~-~ (1} Parcel 1 and Tax Map 53-9 (1) Parcel 5 {Sheet i6). Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Co~mission had recommended approval of the request with modifications to the requested rescuing and sub}eot to certain eondition~, Mr. Jim Parka Breamer~ Yoangblood and King, was present r~Dresentiag the applicant. Ee stated that when the Plannisg Commission had r~viewed ~he application and modified tho~e uses allowed in Tract 3~ he felt that cluster homes were inadvertently eliminated when the mid-rise housing was eliminated. He stated the 5pplicant would like to hays cluster homes included with a ~ensity of four per aura and presented the Board with Rescription Of requirements for the clue%er homes. ~e stated that the applicant would also like condition ~13 amended which would re%uira the c~llectur road fully constructed "prior to the release of any occupancy permit", changed ~o read "after the 100th unit.*' Mr. Dmniel inquire~ wh~t ~he minimum square footage in the cluster homes would be, Mr. Parks stated 1200 square fee%. Mr. Ran Peter~ of the ~aadawbreak Manor Subdivision submitted letter i~ support of the project. Be stated the residents a~a still concerned with traffic in the area, especially at Hopkins and Chippenhsm, but that this is a good compromise. o'Neill thanked the residents and the applicant for working together in thi~ matter. Hr. Daniel indicated the association ~f Meadowbreek ~states was beneficial in this compromise as wall. Mr. Daniel stated ha was concerned with the amanda%eat being requested at this ti~e ragar~ing the construction of the collector road. Mr. Park stated he mentioned this at the Planning Commission and thought this wee to be recC~muunded. Mr. Daniel stated his concern that 99 units would be built and then th~ project would not continua es had others, and then people would be living in an area without proper ingress and ~gress. ~. Parks stated that the read would b~ built in incrementm, this conditiun would require that it not be ~omplate~ until after ~he 10~th unit. Mr. Paters stated his 3o~cern and the problems that would be caused. Mr. Parks stated that there are planned 220 unit~ rather than the 290 as 9riginalty proposed and thi~ wauI~ be approximately one-third ~f the units in the development which will take eppro×imately Feare to complete. ~e stated this would eau~e the owners to uarry the cost of the road for six years in these 5epreseed times~ Mr. Parks stated the applicant had proffered ;o improve the Dalahrook interchang~ which would cf great uanefit. Mr. Daniel stated that he was not happy with this sonditicn being reooI~mended fur change at the last minute but ~hat he would taka it as good ~aith on the part of the owner of =he property. After further discussion of the matter, it was Dn motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Doddt resolved that ~be Board approve the following rezoninq for the above ~escribed parcel of land subject to the conditions oRtlined Tract 1 shall be ~onad Residential IR-15) with a maximum density of two (2) units per acre. Any lot ~ithin 4DO faet of Cogbill R~ad shall conform tO R-15 bulk requirements while ail other lots within the tract coul~ be r~duced to R-iR zoning requirements; 82-218 Tract 2 SA&il be zoned ResidentiaA (R-9] and composed solely of single family detached dwellings with a density of 3.2 units per acre; Tract 3 shall be zoned Residential Townhou~e for Sale {R T~) and develo~s~ for townhoupe for ~ale unit~ and/er cluster homes with a maximum density cf ~eur {4) units per acre; Tract 4 shall be zoned Residential (R-9) and developed ainqle family detached dwellings with a maximum density of 3.2 units per acre. Any lot within 225 feat of oalebrook Drive ~hall confcz~ to R~12 requirements with remaining lots conforming to R-9 requirements. nditiuns¢ Tke below stated conditions no~wi~hstanding, Exhibit A and B and th~ Ts×tun! £~a=sment, shall be considered the apmlicatien end Master ~lan. It shall be :he policy o~ th~ ~!anning Commission to interpret ~he Raster Plan as s~atement of intent and purpose. The ~as=ar Plan mhall be modified by the conditions, as imposed and approve~ herein, and the ~©~ditlons imposed by schematic plan approval. Working interpretations of any and all condition~ and/or exceptions to the application shall be made by the Planning Commlss~oe at the ruquest of th~ ~la~ning sehe~aatic plans, as required by Section ~I-34 (L) (4) c of the Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the Ce~isslon may conditionally approve schematic plans to asc~rtaln that they will bs in conformance with the approved M~ster Plan Approval of the Master Plan does not imply that the County gives final approval of any particular subdivision road developer can build ur construct facilities in approved by the Planning DeparSmen~ and the County sewer system other than tka Chesterfield County public utility system. Approval of thi~ request does net Utilities Department. granted herein, approval of the application by the ~oard conformance with the spirit, intent an~ purpos~ of this request. Open space nequired to satisfy density and/or lot reguire~ants for a single tract, development and/or 82-219 individual lot shall not be counted as required open space for any othm~ tract, development and/or lot. Land area and co~cn open space, which is r~guired %o make up for reduced let sizes, shall bm land reasonably usable natural state. 10. The applicant or developer shall provide an accurate account of the drainage situation showing existing drainage and the impact individual tracts, ae they are developed, will kava on that tract, as well as ~he surrounding area. The developer shall submit plans to ~nvircnmental Engineering which shall provide for on and off-site drainage control. The plan ~hall explain the msthud and ~acilities to be utilized in the hydraulic engineering of the project. These plans shall be approved by Environmental Engineering prior to the clearing of any land. It shall be understood that Environmental Engineering may impose conditions, r~quiremen:s or measures which they deem necessary to in~ur~ that proper drainage control is provided for and ~aintainod. approved p~an shall be implemented in ~hatever stag~s or phases acceptable to and necessary, as d~termined by 1I. For individual tracts am they are developed, the applicant and/or developer mhall submit plans for eromion and sediment control tn Environmental Engineering. ~u~h plans are to be comprised of vegetative and engineering practices ~o be ueilised as erosion and sediment control measures for the project. ~eneralty, such practices shall be thsse outlined in the "Erosion and S~di~ent Control Technical Handbook" published by the James River Soil Wa~er Conservation District_ However~ it is to be understood that additional requirements and measures may be substituted by Environmental Engineering upon review of the ~lans. Th~ plans shall be approved by Environmental engineering prior to any clotting or grading. The plan*s measures shall be implemented prior to the clearing of any land, cutting of any tr~uu~ or ctherwis% di$~urbancm of the parcel's natural ~tate. 12. Thirty-~ive (35) fee~ of right-of-way measured from the cent~rline of the e~isting pavement on Cogbill ~ead for the entire l~ngth of the property which abuts this road shall be dedicated to and for the County of Chesterfie!d~ free and unrestricted. 13. The sixty ~60) loeb ~ollectur thoroughfare indicated on the Master Plan shall bm fully constructed prior to the release of the !01st oscupaney permit. 14. A left turn lane shall be constructed on Cogbill Road and the collecton thoroughfare at hhulr intersection prior to the release of any cccBpancy p~rmit in Trae~ 15, a. ~ the Dalebrook interchange is not relosated~ feet of right-of-way measured from the c~nterline of ~he existing pavement on Dalebrook D~ive for th~ entire length of Tracts 1 and 4 shall be dedicated to and ~or the CoUnty of Chesterfield, free and unrestricted. b. If th~ Dalebrook interchange is relocated~ 35 right-of-way measured from the centerline of the e×i~%ing pavement on Dalebrook Drive for the entire lenqth of Tract 1 shall be dedicated to and for the County of Chesterfield, frae and unrestricted, 82-220 16. a. If the Dalebrook i~terchangs is not relocated, feet of pavement, measured from the centerline cf the existing pavement on Datebrook Drive shall be constructed for the entire lengthu of Tracts 1 and a4 prior to the release of any ~ccupancy permit. If the Datebrcok interchange is relccated~ t5 feet of pavement, measured fro~ the centerllne of the existing pavement on Dalebrock Drive shall constructed for the em%ire length of Tract 1 Drier to the release of any OCCupancy permit. -7. Individual let access to Cogbill Road shall be prohibited. ,8. In conjunction with schematic plan approval, specific landscaping plans for all buffer areas described ~n the applicant's Textual Statement and Master Plan shall be submitted to the 91annlng Commiusio~ for approval. 9. Architectural plans and the quality of coma=ruction in all tracts shall be approved by the ~lannins Commission in .conjunction with schematic plan approval.~ 0. bwellin~ unit sires shall b~ as Tract 1 - i$0Q square feet Tract 2 = 1300 square feat Tract 3 - i200 square Tract 4 - 1300 square feet [. Cluster heme~ in Tract 3 ~hall conform to the rsquiremen~s outlined in the Te~tuai ~tatement, Tract ~, ~. Cluster Hemes, a through 1. - Unanimous ~s011 Mahoasa Magisterial District, Ricke~ F. and T~mara L. Reason ~asted resorting ~rem Agricultural (A) to Residential (A-9) a 114.11 acre parcel frontin~ approximately 24Q0 fe~% on the ~theast lin~ of Bailey Bridge Road and located ~i~ectly ross from its intersection ~ith Quaflwood ~oad. Tax ~ap 76-3 part of Paras! 22 [Sheet 20]. Balder~cn stated the Plannin~ Commission had recommended u~ thi~ reques~ subject to &eceDt~Aee e~ the proffere~ ~ditions by the applicant. }k- Jim Heye~ was present }resenting the applicant. Hr. O'Neill in,ired if the front existing houses wo%ld face the backyard6 of the proposed ~ment. Mr. Hayes s=ate~ that the applicant had agreed tc m st with the neighborhoo~ p:ior to development beginning to e: isting property ownez, stated that homes will-face th~ backs c= newly developed lots, that the lot sizes and square footage · : net consistent with what exists and ~h~? are opposed unless ti development is consistent with existing ~ous£ng. Hrs. Ki Taylor ~tated that her home would face ~he backvard of h~ ~ new area and she wes cppo~e~ ts this ~uvelopment ~nder ti ~se circumstances. Hr. ~ayes ~ta~ed =hat they would like ~o ~t with the area residents as there are 12 homes which weald b~ affected. He ~tated the Planning Commission wo~%d not meet or this case for four weeks in which he had time to discuss the rf ;ideate concerns and modify tko plans, if necessary. O'Neill reed the applicant,s letter with regard to gross footag~ and indicated he f~lt ther~ was some concern and 82-221 confusion between gross square footage and heated living area, ~tc~ bk. Hawes that that they had proposed heated living space originally and the opposition had requested gross souare footage and that origintlly they had proposed 1200 ~qu~re foot of heated living space. Mr. O~Neill inquired about the financing of the project. The applicant stated that the financial plans have not been finalized yet but it might involve some FHA, VA, Conventional, etc. Mr. O'Neill inquired about the timebable. The applicant indicated ha would begin as soon as possible with c©nstruetion. After further discussion of the matter, it was on motion o5 Mr~ O~Neill~ seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that this request ba deferred until June 23~ 1982 in order that the applicant meat with the exi~%ing resident~ to attempt to reach an acceptable compromise. Vots~ Unanimous Mr. O'Neill excused himself from the meeting. In ~idlothiun ~agia=erial District, Parker and Lancaster Corporation r~q~t~d rezoning from Agricultural (Al to General Business {B-3} of e 4.192 acre parcel which is located ag gh~ $©uth~rn terminus of trove Koad. Tax ~ap 16-16 (1) Parcel 3 Mr. Baldergon stated that the Planning Commission had recommendod approval o~ ~his request subject to imposition of one condition. There ~as no opposition present. On motion of Mrs. Gir0ne~ seconded by Fir. Bookman, tko Board approved this request subjeut to the following condition; A 50 foot buffer Shall be maintained along the southeastern property line. This buffer shall be maintained in its natural state with no clearing or grading permlt%ed. There Shall be no facilities permitted within this buffer area. Aye~ Mrs. Girone~ Mr. Bookman, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Dodd. Absent~ Mr. o'Neill. In Midlothlan Ma~isterlal District, Motorola C & E r~guemted renewal of a previously granted Conditional Use (Ca~e ~79S194) to permit a radio broadcasting building on a 3 acre parcel whiuh lies lDO feet off the southeast line of Winterfield Road measured from a point located approximately 900 feet no~th of its intersection with Westfiel{ Road and better known as 1400 Winterfield Roa~. Tax Hap 15-7 {1~ Parcel 1 (sheet 7). }Ir. Balder~on stated the Planning Ce~ission had recommended approval of this request subject to certain conditions. gentleman Was pre,ese representing the applicant. There was no opposition present. On motioA of Mrs. Girone, aeconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board auuSoved this request subjec~ to the fei!owing conditions: ~ 50 foot buffe~ consisting of natural vegetation shall be maintained along all prop~rt? ~ine~. ~o clearing, cutting er grading shall be permitted within th~se buffers. Only one access ehall be permitted through ~bese buffers and it shall be located along %he eastern buffer. 82-222 The driveway leading to the subject prooerty shall be paved or graveled and maintained ho provide camm of in~reea and egress. No sign shall be permitted. Drainag~ ditches and swales runninq across ihs prop~r~y shall be cleared and maintained monthly to allow unrestricted flow of water. There shall be no additional improvements to the s~bjeut property, The drainage ditch which intersects the SOuthern Railroad property shall be stabilized so as %0 preclude further erosion. A stabilizetisn plan shall he submitted to Environmental Engineering for approval and implemented per their requirements. This Conditional Use shall Be granted to and for Motorola C ~ E InC., and stall not be transferabl~ nor run with the land. , ~s: Mrm. Girone, 5ir. Bookman, ~r. Daniel and Mr. Dodd. 0sent: Mr. O'Neill. Clover Hill ~'~agisterial District, J. W. ~;alton, Jr. and :auk g. Dowd requested rezoning from Agrlcultnral {A) to ~n~al Suginess [B-~) o~ a 4.8 ecr~ parcel fronting Pproximately 350 feet on the north line of Hull Street Road nd located approximately 700 feet west of it~ interssction i~h Cuurthoum~ Road. ~ax Map 49-7 (!} Parcel 7 {Sheet t4}. salderson stated the PlanAinq Commission had recoI~mendsd mnial of the B-3 zoning and recoim~ended approval of B~2 zoning ubjeut to a certain condition. ~r. Walton wa~' present. There us no oppo~i~io~ present. On ~otion of Mr. Beokm~ seconded ~r. Do~d, the Board approved (~-3) zoning for a depth uqual the existing ~-3 zoning adjacent %o the western boundary and Dr a length of 200 feet eastwardly measured from the weutern Dun~ary of %he existing B-3 zoning to the west and further, ~proved B-2 with a Conditional U~e Planned Development to 9rmit a ~otel On %he reK~ining portion of th~ property subject the ~ollowinq conditien~ $outhsrn property lin~ adjacent to Route 36D (Note~ Fifty (50) f~et is required building and parking setback along Rou=e 36D). With the exception of two ascesse~, there shall be no facilities permitted within this buffer area. The exact loc&rice Of these driveways shall be approved by the Planning Department in conjunction with VDH&T at tbs time of ~ite plen review. ~s: Mrs. Girone, F~. Bookman, ~r. Daniel and Mr. Dodd. ~sen~: Mr. O~N@ili. O~Neill returned to the meeting. !SQ39 Clover Hill Magisterial District, Dreelin Developmen9 ~mpany, Inc. requested rezening from Agricultural IA) to [lice Business (0) with a Conditional U~e Planned Development psrmi= use and hulk exceptions to the requirements of the ~ning Ordinance on a 4~ acre parcel fronting approximately !00 feet on the south line of Midlothian Turnpike and located 92-223 d~ cc ~ctly across ~ro~ its intersection with Robious Road. TaX 17-12 (1) parcel~ 15 and 16 (Shunt 8)_ Balderson stated tko Planning Co~u~i~ion had recommendud royal of this request subject to certain condition~. ~ Dreelin pr~sente~ elides depicting the ~elop~ent, the schematic pla~s, otc. ~ stated tha~ =bls :posed d~ve!opment should creat~ approximately 3,275 jobs in ~ County and there should be a tax ~en~fit to the County of 10,00~. Mr. Bookman and ~,~r Daniel co.ended the develoDer~ ~ff and the cO.]unity fur working together in Such a- ~fes$ional manner. After further discussion of %h~ matter, was on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by ~r. Dodd, the .rd approved this request subject to the following .ditions: The conditions stated herein notwithstanding, the application, textual statement and plan prepared by Cooper, Cary and Associates, dated 2/~6/~1 and revised 3/18/~2, shall be considered the plan of development. R~proval of the master plan does net imply that %ho County g~ves final approval of 'any particular roa~ seution. Working interprets:ions of any and all conditions and/or exceptlon~ to the application shall be made by the Planning Commission at %he request of the Planning Department upon submission, review and approval Of schematic plans, as ret/aired by Section 21-34 Il} the Zoning Ordinance. Purthermore~ the Commission Conditionally approve schematic plans to ascertain that ~hsy will be in conformance with the approved master plan and other applicable Ordinances. Except where expressly referred ~o herein, approval of this application does not guarantee that the developer can build or construct facilities in the future in aCCordance with present r~gulations. If County stan4ards are more Or less r~rictive than those established herein, th~ County may require construction to adhere to the more restrictive standards. A copy of any covenants, deed restriu~ions and rela~ed to the property owner association shall be approved by Development Review and the CoUnty Attorney'~ Office for adherence to County Ordinances prior to the ruoordatlon of ~uch documents. No uses shall be permitted which would use any water Or sewer system other %hen the Chesterfield County public utilities system. Approval of thio resuest do~$ obligate th~ County to extend water or s'~wer lines. All extensions end necessary improvement co,ts shall be ~orne by the developer. Prior ~o construction water and sewer plans shall be submitted ~ and approved by the Otilitiem Department. (utilities) Notwithstaa~ing, the ekoeptions to use and bulk rsg~latiens granted herein, approval of th~ .application by the Board of SupervisOrs does no~ obligate th~ Planning Commission to approve a particular schematic plan which is not in conformance with the spirit, intent and purpose of this request. The number and location of fire hydrants shall be determined by the Chesterfield Fire Department. The developer shall b~ar the cost for installation of hydrants. IFire) A to,al of 26 feet of pavement, measured from the centmrline of the existing pavement en tko eam~bound lane along Midlothian Turnpike frontage~ shall be constructed. 82-224 This additional pavement shall be constructed with curb and gutter. This lan~ ~haL1 b~ constructed to VDH&T standards and taken into the State system prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit~, Except where expressly stated herein~ all public roads shall have a minimum of 36 feet of pavement with concrete curb and gutter. All public roads shall have a minimum right-of-way of 60 feet, A ~inimu~ of 48 feet of ~avement with curb and Gutter ~nd a rais%d median sh~ll b~ constructed a~ong the-proposed north/south collector road from its infer~ee%ien with Route 60 to a point ~00 feet south (i.e. tn the entrance~ into the bank and hotel ~ife). Access ~o this collector road shall be Drohibitsd along this ~ection. From the =erminus of the rai~ed ~edian southward, the pavement width may b~gin transition for a ~ietanoe of 200 feet south tO a width of 36 feet. Thio ~6 feet of pavement shall be c©nmt~ucted with curb end gutter for th~ remainin~ length of the collector road, The proposed Collector road shall be constructed to VD~&T standards and taken into the Sta~e system prior ~o the iseuancu of any occupancy p~rmits for Fhases 3 and 4 (i.e. see Phasing Plan - Water and Sewe~). 4. The prupoae~ access fo Midlothian Turnpike which is to be ~hared with the adjacen~ property to the eas~ ~hal] have a minimum of 3~ feet o~ pavement with concrete curb and gutter. This driveway ska!l ba designed to ~inimize internal turning movements and congestion. This conStrue%ion shall be to VD~&T standards and completed prior tQ the issuance of any occupancy Dermits for Phas~ I (i.e. see Phasing Plan - Water and Sewer). 5. The buffer and landscape areas described in the applicant's textual statement shall consist of vegetation ~hich will provide year ~round scraenin~ of driveways, parking area and read~ ~rom adjacent residential development. In conjunction with auhematic plan approval, the applicants shall mubmit specific landscaping plans to the Planning Commission fc~ approval. Ail buffer a~eas shall be installed in conjunction with %he phasing of the development. Ail utility lines shall be provided with underground dimtribution, 7. Ali private drives (where ther~ is ue adjacent perking) shall b~ ~aved to a w~th of not less than 25 feet utilizing curb and gutter. This cendi=ion K~/y be modified aL the time of schematic plan review. ,8. Ail exterior lighting shall be low-level and positioned so as net t~ project light in~o adjacent residential properties. Whe design of the light fixtufe~ shall be approved by the ~lanninq Ce~mismion in conjunction with schematic plan review. 9. One sign not to e×ceed 100 ~quare feet in area shall be permitted along Route 60 identifying this development and the tenants therein. The sign shall not b~ luminous, but may be illuminated. Individual tenants may have freestanding ~igns provided they are Dot visible f~om Route 60. All signs shall blend with the architmcfural shyle of the development. Prior to erection, g sign proposal depicting 82-225 2~ s~vla colors aIld materiels shall be submitted to Development Review for approval. The p~epos~d Structures sh~ll have an architectural style similar to the pictures and rendering~ submitted ~{ith the application. The above stated conditions notwithstanding, ali bulk ~on areas ~here parklnq or drivewav~ are lo~at~d closer than 50 feet to the Plidlothian Turnpike right-of-way, plan COnsisting of vegetation and/or berming ~hall be submitted to the Planning Cow~iaeion for approval. Such a plan shall provid~ for ~he screeninq of any parking or driveway areas adjacent to Midlothian Turnpike. · he applicant and/or developer shell provide an account of the drainage situation showing dralna~e and the impact individual tracts, as they develeped~ will have on that trect~ as wall ag Qbe surrounding area. The developer shall sub,it pl&n~ for on for approval. The plan shall explain ~he method and facilities %o De utilized in the hydraulic enqine~rinq o~ the projeot. These plan~ ~hall be approved by applicant and/er developer ~hall submit plans for erosion plans are to be comprised of vegetative an~ engineering be those as outlined in the Virginia Soils and water E~gineerlng prior ~0 any clearing or ~rading. The plan's Prior to th~ release of any buildinw pe/-mit~, an ~etentlen, faoiliti~s shall be ~eztified by a professional The e×ishing dewnstre~ drainage ~iruation throeqh Shenandoah Subdivision ~hal% bs analyzed for proper Prior to a~y clearing, grading or other lan~ disturbing 82-226 conjunction wigh the phasing of this development. The depths of the water in the retention ponds shell be Ccnservation Ce~issiea so as fc preclude proliferation ef quality accomplishes eke aesthetic objectives of the may Be modified et the time of schematic plan review. The developers shall be responsible for implementing a the COnStruction of permanent cul-de-sacs and/or the uhall bu the developer's responsibility to acquire and dedicate the necessary right-of-way, relocate u=illti~m prior tc the issuance of any occupancy permits. O'Neill excused himself from the masting. Clover Hill Magisterial District~ NAPA Genuine Parts Company >nditional Use Planned Development ICaee ~73-13) to permit ~tside storage in a Light Industrial (M-i) District on a :re parcel frcntlng approximately ~25 f~et on th~ we~% line of )uthlake Boulevard and located a9proximately 410 Zest south ~s intersection with Southlake Court and better known as >uthlake Boulevard, Ta~ Map I7-10 {2) SouthDort, Section ~t 1 (Sheet ~). r. Baldersen ~tated the Planning Commission had recommended pproval of this request subject to certain conditions. A entleman was present representing the applicant. T~ere was no pposition present. On motion of Mr. Bookman~ Ps,ended by Mr~ a~d, the Board approved this request subject to th~ ~ul!cwing auditions: A solid board ~ence having a minimum height of six (6) feet and e minimum length of sixteen (16) feet, constructed of 1 inch by 4 inch or 1 inch by 6 inch boards, stained in an earth tone color, shall be Soutklake Boulevard. This fence shall be 9esitione~ so as to screen the view of pallets ~rom South/eke on the site ~lan submitted with the application, The h~ight of th~ pallets shall not exceed the height of the fence. ~ Mm, Girone, Mr. ~ookman, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Dodd. sent: Mr. O'Neill. n Midlothien ~agi~teria! District, ~rrisen'~ Cafeteria :harlette, Inc. requested an amendment to a condition o~ a ,evelepment (Case %81S034) to permit the addition of a "reader ,card" to ~he permitted freestanding sign ena parcel frontinq ~2-227 ~ro×imately 230 feat on the north line of ~idlothian Turnpike nd located approximately t1§ fe~t w~ of i~s inter~ection itt N. Providence Rued. Tax MaD lS-15 []} parcel 37 (Sheet ;. Balderson stated the Planning Commission had recommended pprevel of this request subject to a certain condition. There as nu opposition present. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded F Mr. Beokman~ %he Soard approved this request subject ~0 the The sign shall be of the same design and size as that depic%eO in the rendering submitted by th~ appliuant an~ included in the S~af£ Re~ort. ~, Dodd excused himself from tie ~eetin~. s. O'Neill returned to the meeting. 2S044 ~ Clev~r Hill Magisterial D~strict, Br&nd~rmill ~eque~ted ~n ~ception to a previously granted Conditional U~e Planned ~velomment ICase #745621} to permit game rooms within all [stricts. This request encompasses %he planned development of 'andermill which lies on th~ north line of Route ~60 and )uthwest o~ %he inters~ctlon of Coalfield and Geni~o Roads. %x Map 61-12 {1) Dareels I and 6: Tax Map 6] (l) P~rcul 20; ~x Map 36 (1) parcel 4; Tax Map 47 (l) parcels 6 and 9; Tax ~p 61 91) parcels 6, 8 and 9~ Tax Map ~6 {l} parcels 32-1 and !3-1; and Tax ~ap 61~16 {1) parcel 5 (Sheets 13 and 20). r, Balderson statmd the Plen~in9 Commission had enlal of tko request in the B-1 area which lies in the orthern part of the devetopmen~ in the vicinity of Genito and ld ~undred Roads and approval of the request in the ~-1 areas djacent to Rout~ 360, subjee~ to tko imposition of certain ~nditions. Mr. J. B. Campbell was present an~ stated the sco~,~mendation of the PlaDnln~ Comraission was acceptable as ell ae ~he conditions. There was no opposition present. On 0rich of Mr. BoOkm~D, seconded by Mr. DanieI~ the Board denied he request in the B-1 area which lies in the northern part of he development in the vicinity of Genito and Old Mundred Roads sd approved the request in the B~i area~ adjacent to Route 360 ~bjeot to the following eogditions: This facility shall be supervised by an adult during all hours of operation. There shall be no alcoholic ~everage$ allowed on, or sold Th~ above stated conditions notwithstanding, all bulk requirements of th~ Convenience ~usiness (B-l) District shall be applicable and all previously imposed conditions of the ormginally granted Conditional Use for Brandermill which are applicable to B-1 uses shall be a~kersd to. This use shell be confined to the Convenience Business (B-l) ar~as adjacent to Route 360. This COnditional Use approval shall be granted f©r a period not to exceed on~ (1} year from ~ate o~ approval. Upon satisfactory reapplication and demonstration that this use has been of no detrimmnt to area properties, this Conditional Use may be renewed, 62-228 returned to the mes~in~, g~ f~ D~ a~ G pr 1. Dale Magisterial District, Hanover ~rssbvtery, Inc. ~ueated &mendment~ to conditions 9, 10 and I2' of e previously ~nt~d res0ning and Conditional Use Planned Development ~Ca~ )S099) tc p~rmit the deletion of the 30 foot bu£fer along the ~h and east property lines; individual scc~ to Ircnqate ~d~ and a c~ntempcrary design buildin~ on a .97 acrs parcel ~nting approximately 190 fe~t on the north line of Ironga[e _ye and located approximately ~00 f~et east of it~ ~ersection with Iron Bridg~ Eoad. ~a~ ~D 6~-2 (1) parcel ~ Balderson Stated the Planning Com~nissi~n ha~ recommended lroval of this request subject to certain conditions. Mrs. ~One questioned :he need for this approval. Mr. Balderson ~lained that th~ Church did not meet all the requirements in ~ Conditional Uss Planned Development but that if it had been ~ed straiqh~ residential, etc. th~s weald not be needed, ~re was no oppos±tion present. On motion of Mr. ~aniel~ ~onded by Mr. Dodd, this request was approved ~ubj~ct to the lowing cuaditions~ The si~e plan, prepared by Clave, N~wr~an and Anderson shall be considered the plan of development. Th~ structure to be erected on the parcel shall be similar to the rendering submitted with theapplication.' ' ~046 Clover Hill Magisterial District~ Midlothian Company [nested a Conditional Use t~ p~rmlt an outdoor recreational ~illty (Ball~ield} in a Residential (R-15) District on a 6 ;e parcel which lies approximately 200 feet off the ~outh ~e of ~i~gscross Road measured ~rom a p~int approximately 300 ~t west of its intersection with La~y Ashley Road. Tax Map .13 (i) part Of Parcel 1 (Shes% 7}. Baldersen s~at~d the Planning Co--isaiah reconh~ended ,royal ~ubject to certain eenditions. Mr. Jim ~ayes was ~sent represen=ing the applicant. There was no o~position ~sent. gn motion of Mr, Book, an, seconded by Mrs. Girone, request wa~ approved subjec5 to the following conditions: The below ~tatad conditions~ notwithstanding the site plan prepared by J. K Tia~ons and Assoeiates~ Ins., dated ~ebruary 22, 1982, shall be considered the plan of development. The proposed hallfield shall not b~ lighted. The hours of use shall Be limited to Sunday ~h£eugh Thursday from 8:00 a.m. until 9:OO ~.m. and Friday and Saturday from 8:0d a.m. until 12:~0 p.m. Ther~ shall be no public address system or speakers. A plan for the buffering of th~ ballfisld shall be submitted to the Planning Department for ~ppruval in conjunction with final site plan submission. This plan shall conxis% of fencing, harming and/or existing/new 82-2~9 vegetation. This facility shall be screened from view of any exi~tln~ or proposed single family residences, Pedestrian access easements shall be recorded aG a part of the final subdivision past to allow access tc the baltfield from proposed Lady Ashley Road to the north and the proposed road located t~ the south. There shall be no signs permitted identifyil~g the ballfield. Should the applicants wish to identify the recreational usa, it Jhall be identified On the permitted sign under Conditional use ~2S010. S048 Matoaca Magisterial Dietriot~ Victor M~ Day requested a ndit~onal Use to permit a stock farm (one horse) in a Sidential (~-25) D{strict on a 1.8 acr~ parcel fronting proximately 200 feet on Plantation Trace Drive also frontiu~ proximately 400 feet on Plantation Trac~ 91ace and located in e northwest quadrant of the intersection of th~e roads and tter known as 11664 Plantation Trac~ Drive. Tax Map 109-14 Plantation Trace, Lot 7 (~h~et 29). Bal~erscn sta~ed ~he Plannin~ Commission had recommended ,~al of :his request. Mr. Day was present and stated h~ had ~quested a d~ferral of this ca~e this date in order that he ght ¢onta=t an attorney to ~ecertain what action h~ might be ,la to take. }~r. 0'NsilI stated h~ felt this was more of a ~ighborhood matter.. Mr. Day stated that the neighbors may ~ve a complain~ about the odor but there is none and that he fought if the cohditions placed on this use were not adhered it could be revoked. ~r. O~Neill stated ~his was eorre~t. · MOrganf an adjacent property owna~, stated he was opposed this beznq approved as this i~ a nice neighborhood and there an unattractive shad ~or the Staring of hay, e=c., that the nco and horse do not add to the subdivision but detract and aT there dses exist an odor from the horse. ~e stated ~his against the c©v~nants snd restrictions whisk w~re signed by ~ purchmser in th~s subdivision. He stated of the five ]scant property owner~, four ar~ opposed. ~trs. Day ~t~ted at she had discussed keeping of the horse on ~he property ior to placing him there and there were no objections. ~r. Naill explained that the Day~ were requesting something that s net allowed but for whiuh there are provisions for M Spain, an ad3acent property owner, eta=ed he objected to odor from the horse. ~r. MarshelI~ an adjacent neighbor, another resident from the area were opposed because this w. against th~ aeronauts and restrictions for the n, [hborhecd. The daughter of the Day's stated that the family e-~. Sbt s~ated that the horse was bought for their pleasure a: wall as th~ area children and that dogs in the area are w, use as they destroy other neighbors property which th~ horse ~ ~ve =ha horse would not be detrimental to the area. Mr. ~ei!t stated tha~ to approve this would be an exoagtion to wi ~= is allowed. He stated that the neiqhbors woul~ have tO a: ]rove this request. H~ stated that he would be glad to meet ~2 ~h th~ neighbors to ~iscus~ this matter and suggested that tt ~ Day's find a possible hoarding situation for ~he hors~. On mc :ion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded bv Mr. ~ookman, the Board 4( ~arred further consideration of %h±s ~atfer until July 28, 82-230 ~ues~od a cen~tional Use Planned Development to p~rmit a at exception to the 30 foot rear yard setback and to permit a ~0 square foot ex,spt-ion to the 22,000 square foot mitation for warehouse space in a General B~sinese strict on a parcel which lies approximately ~0 feet off tho uth line oi ~idlcthian Turnpike m~asured from a point proximately 375 ~eet ae~t of its inter~ec~ion with Southleke ulevard. Tax Map 17-10 (1) Darnel 17 (Sheeb 8). . Bald~x$on stated the Planning Co~is~isn had recommended provsl Of this r~qu~s~ subject to certain conditions. n~ Freund was present representing the applicant. There was opposition present. On motion of Mr. ~o0k~an~ seconded by · DQ~, the Board approved this request .subject to certain ndibion~: The below ~bated conditions, notwithstanding the site plan ~ubmitted with ~he application shall be considered th~ plan of development. Tko buildings to be con~tru=ted shall bs similar in a~okieectural style and colorinq to those which presently exist on the subject parcel. Ne more than 1860 additional square feet shall be constructed. ~he above stated condition~, notwith~tandlng, all bulk requiremenhs of ~he General Business (B-3} Dist~ist shall be applicable. In conjunction with the 5pproval of 'this request, the ~lanninq Commission ~hall grant schematic plan approval the plan submitted with the application. ~. Daniel excused himself from the !S~25 B~rmuda Magisterial Distri~t~ Alhar Aealty, Inc. requested ~zoning from Convenience Ruszness {B-l) to General i-3) of a .469 acre par~l fronting approximately llO fee~ On ~e sooth line o~ West Hundred ROad and located approximately feet west o~ its intersection with Peqersbur~ Street. Tax ~p 115-7 (2} chester, Block Q2, Part of Lots 413, 413B add 414 ~heet ~. Balderson stahed the Planning Commission had reoo~f~unded :nial of this r~quest. The applican~ was not present. Mr. ~dd stated that it had been his understanding that thi~ ~quest wa~ to be withdrawn. He stated that hu would r~commen~ 30 ~ay d~ferral of thin request and unle~ the r~cu~st was %anded or withdrs~¢n he would recommend denial. On motion of '_ D~dd, seconded by Mr. Booknan~ the Board deferred ~nsideration of this request until June 23, 1982. .o consider freely Road for Rural Addition funding. Unanimous In motion oi Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board pproved the following projectm 3f this time for Horst ~ddltionsl Funds: Oak Lawn Street Bermuda District - $60,000 - Construction from Normandale Avenue to dead end. Treety Road - Metoaoa District - $160,000 - Construction fro~ C~se~briar Subdivision to Branders Bridge Road. ,ce: Unanimous ~n motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the following resolution was adopted: ~hereas, Section 33.1-75.1 of the Code of Virginim stat~s that "tke state Highway and Transportation Commi~slen ~hall make an eguivalent matching allocation to any county for ~ssiqnation~ by the governing body of up to fifteen percentum ~f funds received by it pursuant tO 'The ~tate and Local PiscaI ~ssistance Act of 1972'"; and Whereas, Chesterfield County'~ rev~n~e mharinq fUnd~ for Entitlement ~eriod 13 amounts to $1,~30,515. ~ow, Therefore, Be It Resolved that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby designates from it~ revenue sharing funds, an a~ount of $~44,000 to be matched by funds from the State Highway and Transportation Co~issien and to be accounted for in the ~Y$2-83 budget year; and Further Be It R~$olv~d ~h~t the County's eontri~utlon be spportioned in the following manner and matched by State fund~: $48~800 - Plant mix on Lakeview Road from Colonial Melgkts to Woodpecker Road and on Woodpecker Road and Dupuy Road from their intersection west on ~I~,000 - Supplemental ~unding ~or previous Providence Road projects et Elkhardt Road and from Davis school north. $33,80S - Plant mir on Newbys Bridge Road from the vicinity of Cabin Cre~k Subdivision south as far a~ funding permlts~ $4S,800 - Plant mix and improvemeMt~ on LeGordon Drive $48,800 - Supplemental funding for the Hopkins and Beulah Roads inter~ction. $4~,800 - Supplemental ~unding for the Osborne and Wilton Road~ int~r~ection project. Mr. O'Neill stated the Board would like to se~ an overall financial alternatives for the project. prisoners coming to ~he Courthouse to the Magistrates office on specifically he related an incident during the Planning 82-232 13. CQ~mission m~eting of ~ay 25, I982 where an indiv±dumI orashe~ through tko glass door of the Magist~ate~ Office r~sulting in to injury to himself. Ho stated this could have been a more Severe injury to byskander~ in the hallway. ~r. Dedd stated when he was on the Planning Commission an incident had also ocounred when ~n intoxicated person was brought to the Magistratss ~ffice. ~fter further discussion of the matte~, it was on motion Qf ~LT. Daniel, ~ecended by Mr. Dodd, r~olv~d that the ~aqistrat@s Office be r~loeated ~or ~k~ heat%h, safety and welfare of those persons attendio~ public m~tings at the Courthouse. Vote: Unanimou~ Mr. Daniel sxc~ed himself from the meeting as a person who is to b~ nominated to a Committee may be a client of his wife'~ in her accounting business, in order to avoid any possible conflict of interest. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Beck, an, the ~oard appointed Mr. ~obert Sohrum to the Personnel Appeal~ Board effective immediately whose ~erm will expire on December 31, 1982. O'Neill, N[~S. Girone, Mr. Beckman and Mr. bod~. M~. Daniel. Mr. Daniel r~turned to the mesting. on Landfills and the Tax Rate Study in the a~t%rnoon of June 9, 1982. On me,ion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Daniul~ =he Board adjourned at 5:D3 p.m. until 10:00 a.m. on June 9, 1982. County Administrator ~. Merlln O'Neill, Sr. Chaired 82-233