Loading...
08-25-1982 MinutesbOARD OF SUPERVISORS }IINUTES AUgUSt 25~ 1982 Supervisors in Attendance: Mr. =. Merlin O'NEill, Sr., Chairman Mrs. Joan Cirone, Vice Chairm~n Mr. C. L. Bookman Mr. R. Garland Dodd Mr. Richard L. H~drlek County AdnlinistratoT Staff in Attendance= r.~. Stanley ~atdersQn, Din. of Planning Mr. Phil Heater, bir. of Parks and Recreation Mr. Will,am Kowell, Din. of General Service~ Mr. Robert Masden, Din. Mr. Richard ~nv~ron~ental Eng. County TreaSurer Mr. Steve Micas, County Attorney Mn. Jeffrey Muzzy, Din. o~ Co,unity Develop. Mr. Robert Painter, Din. of Utilitie~ Col. Josepk Pittman, Chief of Police Mr. Lane Kamsey, Din. of ~udget & Accounting ~S. Martha Stock, Acting Din. of Mental Men,al Retardation and ~r. Robert Wagenknecht Library Director ~r. O'Neill ualled the'meetln~ to order at the Courthouse ah loll0 a.m. (EDST). ' Mr. Dodd ~ave the invocation. approved the minutes of An~ust 11 ~u~ 19, 1982, Mr. Hedrick ~a~ed that a citizen had wished to agdress the ~eard but since preparation of the agenda, the request had be~n withdrawn. ~I. Daniel requested that if a citizen washed tO addres~ the Board in ~he futur~, %hat ~heir name and subject for ii~Oussion also be mentioned in the Eoard paper. ihi~f Pittman introduced Captain Mark wilson who had recently retired ~rom %he Police Deparlment.. On motion of the Board, the following r~olution was a~opted; Whereas; Captain Mark E. wilson retired ~rom the Ch~ster_leld CounTy Police Department on 5~ay t, 1982; and Whereas, Captain Wilson provided thirty-one (31) years of quality police service to the citi-zens of Chesterfield COUn=v 82-350 will miss Captain Wilson's diligent service. Now, Therefore, Be It Re~olved that the Board publicly recogni~e$ Captain Wilson and extends on behalf of its mer~ers and the citizens of Chesterfield County their appreciation for his many years of service to the County. ~ o~ C~esterfield County, Virginia ~ote: Unanimous Mr. O'Neill pre~ented Captain Wilmon ~ith the framed o$clut/on, Captain Wilson expressed hi~ appreciation and stated he felt it appropriate that Mr. O~Neill pre~en~ him with the resolution a~ he spent one-third of his emplev~ent working wi~h Mr. O'N~ilI on the police force. ' Mr. Masden recognized ~_r. Albert Wynne who had recentl~ retired a~ Administrator of MsntaI ~¢alth, ~ental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services for the County. On motion of the th~ following resolution was adopted: Whereas, $~r. Albert ~. Wynne retired from County employment ~f~ective July 30, 1982; and %4heresy, Mr. Wynne s~rved as Administrator of th~ !hesterfield CoUnty Co--unity Smrvice~ SOard since ~y 1, 1976; ' ~%~ereas~ ~r. Wynns directed the programs of the Community ~erviess ~oard and discharged his duties as Administrator in e ~Fnerea$, ~ir. Wynse, demonstrated a strenq Go~tmitment %O the provision cf qualify ~htal Eealth, Mental Retardation and Smbstance A~use programs~ and hq]crees, Mr. Wynne earned the respeut of hie colleagues and ~taf£ =trough his cooperative spirit and Ccn~tant endeavor to improv~ services. Nom-, Therefore, ~s It Resolved ~hat the Board of Supervisors Df chesterfield County hereby ~xpresse~ its sincere appreciation ~O Mr. Albert K. Wynn~ for his loyal and dedicated service to the ~itizens of Chesterfield County. O'Neill presented ~r. Wynoe ~ith the framed resolution. ~. ~ynne expreseed his appr~ciahign [or ~hie rsco~nitlon. ~r. Heater introduced MS. Marion Baddorf, Soccer Director for ~Pams Athletic Association, who expressed appreciation ~o the ~oard for allowing s soccer program in the Counfy which now :omprisss over 5,0~ youth. She stated the Reams Association ~lone has 10~ volunteers working with the soccer program She :ta~ed that they also appreciated the assistance rec~ive~ from he Parks and Resreation Department in this endeavor and added hat soccer is growing faster than snvon~ anticipated in the !tasty. She stated that the ~ms Athletic AsSociation weu~d ike to present the Board with a check in th~ amount Of $500 hick ~¢ould purckas~ seed fo~ one of the three sOCCer fields ocated et M©nacan Righ School and also to challen~e other ssociatiOus in the area to also donate a similar amount to the ounty. MS. Bad~orf uresented ~r. Bookman with the check. Mr. ookman and e~her members of the Board expressed appreciation for he donation. 82-351 Mrs. ~cGulre, County Treasurer, stated that thm County has reeelved national recosnition by Mcgraw Hill in the June, 19~ Pzoduct Information Network Advisory Report for its cash receipt reporting system in h~r office. She stated since th~ report had received several calls nationwide and several visit~ from Xocat jurisdictions. She stated tha~ the system has visual with in~nediats up,ate ~o the County's accounting system which is the main reason for th~ recognition. She introduced John Hancock, Syste~ Planaer, and ~tated hs and Data Processing were r~sponsible for tyin~ ~he two systems together. Mr_ Hancock stated his appreciation for the Board's support and confidence w~ll as that from the Audit Committee. Ee stated he felt this was an improvement and Dotter utilized %he ~axpavers money, Mrs. McGuire stated that the County of Henrie~ will b~ initiating a similar syste~ in the near future. Mr. ~edrick stated he felt the system wa0 a qreat accomplishment but also Commended bhe cooperation between the County Accounting Department and the Trea~urer'~ Office. Th~ Board expressed their gratitude to ~%cGuir~ and others for their making the =y$~em successful. ~r. Hedrick stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider the restrictiDg of through tru~k traffic on Osborne and Coxendale Road b~tween Route 1 and I=95. ~. Williams stated thio hearing is require by state law prior to the Virqinia D~par~ment of ~ighways and Tranmportation public kearing and action by the Highway Co~ission. ~r. Frank Hodges~ representing the Nermandale and Coxendale residential areas, presented the Board with a petition signed by 287 property ownere and residents of ~he area as well aa 23 letters in suppert of the proposed m~triction. He ~tated that the trucks presented a noise nuisance and danger to their residential neighborhood and children, the roa~s were not ~eeigned to accoRT~odate hsa-¢y traffic and the roads are deteriorating. He stated the trucks cause p~oblems with residential parking~ with resid~ntlal traflic and residential propmrty d~age. Ee stated that this petition has ~ean forwarded to the Virginia Department of ~ighways and Transportation as well a~ the Chesterfield County Planning Co--lesion. Re stated they woul~ like the restriction to apply to Arcadia Avenue and Rio Vizta Street as well. Mr. Dcdd inquired i~ Rio vista and Arcadia could be included in this public hearing. Mr. Micas stated he felt that since two specific roads were advertised, it would be best ~o address Only tkose at this t{me. Mr. Dodd stated he felt it would be beneficial to include Rio Vista and Arcadia and inquired if the residents ~ould be wiltiDg tO agree to s 30 ~ay d~ferral in order that th~se two roads could also be included. ~r. Hodqe$ indicated it would satisfactory. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Daniel, th~ Board d~ferred further consideration of this matter until September 22, 1982 an~ further aUtkorixed staff to advertise for consideration at the September 22, 1982 meeting, the restricting of thrQu~h ~uck traffic On Bio Vista S%ree~ and Arcadia Avenue in conjunction with the restriction on Osborne and Co×endale Roads. On motion of ~. Daniel~ seconded by ~k. Dodd, the Hoard a~hori~ed ~he County A~m~nlstrotor to enter into a contract for =be 9urchase ui 2.05 acres of land located on Kinguland Road from JOhn E. sn~ Sylvia ~. Dodeon and Henry ~., Jr, and vir~inin B. ~yers for inclusion as part cf the proposed Dale Park for $16,626 which funding is tn be expended as follows~ $12,000 - Dale District Bond Funds 4,626 ~ Dale District 3¢ Road Fun~s ~2-352 prepare a plat for the dasd as part of the closing on the property. Mr. Wagonknecht slated that the Courtly library system had received an additional 827,000 in aid from th~ State Library %hen originally anticipated. He stated unde~ the present budget, s~rviee levels cannot bo maintained without this funding. stated if this additional $~7,000 i~ added to the library budget, service levels will ~e maintained until tko end of September. ~tated that there i~ a study underway at this time which will b~ completed a~out O~tober 1, 19S2 which will deal in staf£ ©potation, eta. ~e a~ated at that time~ h~ would have a better insight on the operation of tko library system and will report hie findings to the Board, B~ stated that when co~p~rin~ the hours of operation of the central facility to the o~her 17 jurisdictions with a population of 100,000~, %he County is iow. ~r. Dadd inquired what w~uld happen should the County be ~hort $27,Q00 next year. ~r. Wegenknecht staled the trend ~eems to be fo~ ~id to incrsa~e and not dec~oase as the Connty received $27,0~0 mere than anticipated fhis year. Mr. Daniel stated he understand~ p~ople will utilize libraries when they have no funds to do other things. Mrs. GLrene stated ~he felt ~he system was 'doing more with le£s, which 2he felt wa~ excellent. Mr. Hedriek reminded the Board that uubstantiat Cuts ware made from the library budget un~il the ne~ director was hired. ~ft~r further discussion, i~ was on motion of Mr. Duni~I~ seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board adde~ $27,000 ~o the Librsry'~ budge2 with revenue from the State Library to be increase4 by the On ~tion of ~_r. Daniel, s~conded by ~(rs. Gircno, the Board approved the requezt £Qr a Bloke/raffle permit from ~alem Church Jayceftes for calendar year 198~. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board adopted the following resolution: Whereas, the County ha~ received nn~erous complaints parking along Bonniebank Roa~; and Whereas, thi~ parking situation restricts ~lqht distance, New, Thore~ore~ Be It Resolv~d that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors requests that the virginia Depastm~nt of Highways and Transportation install "No Parklng'~ 5iqn~ along southside of Benniebank Roa~ (Ro~to 2393) fro~ Hopkins Road Route 63V) tO South Frestonwood Avenue (Route Mr. Daniel inquired if there w~re a mechanism by which the above resolution could have been hanOled administratiYsly rather th~n waiting for the Board to take action. ~r. ~edrick stated that the Eighway Department requires resolutions and that until Some procedure could be adopted or approved, this is the proper Mr. Hedrick advised the Board of outstanding appointmsnts. On mu~ion of ~r. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Booku~an, the Board accepfed ~h~ resignatioa of Mark Clark from the Youth Services rescission effective August 13, 198~. ~ute: Unanimous Dn motion of Rt. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board ~ppoinked Mrs. ~ita Dander to the Youth Services Commission ~e~rssentlng Bermuda District whose t~rm as effective immediately ~nd will expire on June 30, 1984. ~r. Bookman inquired if a~l 9oard members wer~ seeking ~n ~ppoiutee to tht Advisory .B~ard of the Central Virginia Health ~ys~ems Agency, Inc. He stated he felt thin could be ~mbarrassing to four o~ the possible five nominees when only eno ~u~ be appointed. It was generally agreed that Mr. Bookman be r. Daniel zsquested ~r. ~rank Gee, Rssideut Engineer with firginia Department o~ Highway~ and Transportation, tc report on -he Cogbill Br±dg~, ~. Gee ztahed tha~ last Friday %he bridge )n Cogbill Road developed the need for repairs which was thought ~uld tak~ only two weeks but extensive repairs are needed. H~ ~tated that they ~ill need to replace the deck and the wall. He ~tated that ~he Department would like to let an emergency contract to replace the daok~ improve the ~ppreaches and ~krengthen the steel. Ke stated the cost i~ estimated to be $75,0a0.. He stated that tko Department would use $$0,0Q0 from i~ maint~nanc~ ~eserva and the County could use ~40,000 allocated to Coqbill Road this year and $~,Q00 which was allocated to Cogbi!l ~oad next y~ar. He stated that major improvements to the Cogbill Road ~ridge were planned for 1985 which would ~est approximately $6QQ;Q0O and that this work would delay the need for that indefinitely. Mr, Daniel stated that bridge at this time. After further discussion i~ was on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by ar. Booknan, resolved that the Board authorfz~ the Highway Department to let au emergency contract for improvements %~ the Coqbill Road brid~e with $30,0~0 comlnq from the ~iohway Department maintenance reserve and ~40,0QQ from this year's Cogbill Roa~ project and $5~000 from n~xt year's Cegbill Bead project. ~r. Daniel requested {bat a release be prepared and ~istributed to the press ~n o~der that area resident~ w~uld ba aware that the bridge would be closed 60 days wether ~han two weeks. Bridge including the raised sidewalks and aggregate material had 9eon approved. He stated tha~ bids will be let in February, 1~85. Mrs. Girone s~aced that she felt ~ight men,ks was anneceasarily long to repair ths bridge. ~r. Gee stated %he intersostion of Route lQ and Chippanham ~eather delays. Be stated :he weather had delayed some of the ~houlder work which caused the opening to be later than ~riginatly anticipaaed~ ~. Dcdd introduced Mr. Bryan Walker who was present at the ~eeting. Mr. Walker stated hi~ concern for the 01d Stone Bridge trussing Falling Cfsek. He stated the bridg~ is in seriou~ ~endition, that tr~s are growing Our of the atone work, there ~re hules in the walk,ay, there is a pine tree beside the bridge, ~he stone on top of the bridge is missing cement, etc. which is tangerous as well as the bridge might collapse. He stated this ~ridge was built in ~823 and has signlfioant historical value. te stated his civic association was interested in this project. {e expressed his appreciation for the street lights and the 12.A. 13 .A. ~l~aning of kh~ area. ~r. Dodd stated that ~e Planning Departmen~ had remedied fha proDlem. ~r. Gsa stated he wa~ not ~ure who had r0epon~ibility for the bridge but the Department did have responsibility for the wayside. Mr. Dodd re~ue~ted that the Department attempt some preventative maintenance until it could be determined who Qn motion of the Board, the virginia ~i~toric Landmarks Commission and the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation are h~reby regueste~ to inve$ti~ate who is 'responsibl~ ~or the preservation of th~ 01d Stone Bridge crossin~ Falling Creek and to take a~p~opriate action to remedy problem. Vote: Unanimous ~t was noted that a co~y ~f this r~golution should be ~ent Count ~eritaqe Commission. Mx. Dodd inquired i~ a tkzn lan~ in Chester, turning north cn Harr0wgats Road could be installed. Mr. Gee stated he would lo~ into this matter. Mr. Bookman expressed appreciation for the paving of Newby'~ Bridge Bead as all was done and not jumt a portion. Mr. Bookman inquired about Providence Road and if the Count~ is holding up ~he Department. Mr. Qee stated there ~y be some legal muttons involved and he will discuss this with Mr. Bookman later. Mr. Book. an inquired about Elkhardt Roa~. Mr. Gee ~tated there were some alternatives which he would also llke to diseugs with Far. Bookf~an at m later Mrs. Girone stated she ha~ received a letter from the Midlo~hian Ruritan Club Transportation Committee in which they address Mt. Herman and County Line Road which stilt have unsignaliz~d railroad cro~sin~s. She inquired when this could ~a completed. Mr. Gee shaked that the Board adopts the six year plan and that one crossing a year is anticipated to b~ accomplished and it would have to be include in that clan. Mtg. Girone stated she had not been aware that these two~roads were n0~ signalized. She forwarded a copy of the letter to Mr. Ge~ and requested he respond to the matter. Mrs. Cirone r~quested that the pot holes in 01dbUry Road be repaired. Sh~ stated that ~here is a landfill operation currently in the area and feels the trucks are aiding ~o deterioration of ~he ~oad. M~. G~ stated he would check into On motion of Mr. Dodd, ~c6nd~d by Mr. Daniel, the BOard approved the installation of a street light cn G~neral Boulevard and Petersburg Pike, not at General ~oulevard and Velda Road with any necessary funds to be expended form the ~ermuda District Street Light Yund~. Vote: Unanimous On motion of Mr. Daniel, s~conded by Mr. Podd~ the Board approved the installation cost cf $240 for a street light at the interaectiom of Iron Bridle ~oad and Cgbla~ision with the funds to be expended form the Dale District S~reet Light V~te: Unanimous M=. Painter presented th~ Board with the wa~er and sewer financial reports. Mr, Daniel questioned the balance of ~ha water ~und ~rom $3~718~648 %o $374,~31. Mr. Painter 5tared that 13.B.1. 13 .B. 2. 13. C. included $3r295,000 for 19~2-~ Capital Improvements Program and added that approximately $t,500,O00-$1,TQ0r000 may net be needed for th= Swift Creek Plant. ~{r. ~edrick stated that Hr. Painter and his staff should be cem/~ended for their efforts regarding th~ Swift Creek Plant as it appears that different alternatives for filtering and treating the water may be approved and could save the County the indicated funds. The Boar~ thanked Mx. Painter and his staff for efforts regarding this plant. Mr. O'Neill i~quire~ about the water Lines from Lake Chesdin and the water pre~Bur~ at th~ Airport. Mr. P~inter stated there is .water through the lines ~urrently but it will not be in full force until the tank is c~mpl~ted which will be in ~eptember. On motion of Mr. Dodd, ~condad by Mr. Daniel, the Beard approved a request to expand Contract No. S88-133C, installation of sewer lines to serve Irvin~ale, to se~'ve ~ive add,floral homes on Starlight Lane which cast is estimated to be $17~945.29 and further the Board ap~ruprlated $1O,00O from 574 surplus to 380-1-70334-4393. Vote: Unanimeus On m~tion of Mr. Dodd~ seconded by ~r. Daniel, the Board approved th~ request of th~ d~velopers of Tfuehe~rt ~elght~, Contract' $77-26CD, for an extension of time to receive refunds from sewer VeLe~ Unanimous Mr. Joh~ Barmen, Right=or-Way Agent~ stated that settlemmnt~ with Carroll and Wands C. ~atson, James H. Jones and Everett S., Jr. an~ Allyson L. Hopkins had bean made for sewer masements for North Beulah Village a~d condemns%ion proceedings should be deleted from the agenda. Mr. Thomas J. Hampton was present representing-Mrs. Louise ~. Ployd. ~ stated Mrs. Pluyd do~s not want ~o have a sewer ~asemant through her p~Op~fty. Ke mtatsd that the easement will destroy trees which have existed for many years, that she has lived in this location for 40 years, and that smwer could tome through the Kingsland Creek area should she decide she wanted it. ~ stated this will devalue her property but if the CQUDty insists on taking the property she will setcl~ for $1,000. Afte] further consideration of the matter, Lt was on motion of Mr. Daniel, seuonded by MX. Bookman, resolved that the condemnation proceeding~ against Louise ~ill ~loyd be deferred until Septembe] 8, 1982 to allow for further negetintions. Vote: Unanimous On motion of ~r. Daniel, seconded by ~r. ~eokman, the Hoard authorized the County Attorney to institute condemnation proceedings against the following property owners if the es set opposite their names are not accepted. And further be it resolved, ~hah the County Ad,iris%rater is authorized to notify said property owners by certified mail of the intention ef the County to enter upon and =aka the property which is ~o be the subject of said condonation proceedings. An e~er~ency existing this resolution shall he and it hereby is declared in full force Warren E. and Paul M. Barnes B76-35T $425.~0 82-356 13.D. 1. Minnie E. O~Neill S76-35T 200.QQ Welford Wigloswozth E~tate S76-35T 374.00 Mr. O'Neill stated ~or the record, there which is he awar~ with Minnie E. O'Neill. Mr. Bookman stated he did not feel voting on %he receipt of the was not aware this h~d been done in the p~st and excluded the report fro~ th~ con~en% items. On me,ion ei Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Daniel~ the Board apprOVed and authorized £h~ County Administrator to execute any necessary documents for the following water contract: W62-71CD/6{S)2712, Che~mwocd, Secainn D subcontractor: Van Dorsn B~cthers~ Inn. Total Estimated Cost: $38,083.$0 Refund for Oversize: F. efund for Of~mit~: 2t2OO.OO Total Refund [~hrough cQmnec~ions and Camh} $10,0~0.00 Es~i~ate~ Developer Cost: Refund in =he amount of $5,250 w£11 ~e from ~66-1-11684~722I and f~rther the Board.transferred $A,80~ from 38O~1-62000-7212 for cash reimbursement to 380-1-62712-7212. Vote: Unanimous On motioD of Mr. Bookman, s~oond.ed by ~v~z-. Daniel, the Beard approved and auqhoriz~d the County Administrator to exeeut~ any necessary documents for William M. ~arm~n, Contractor~t whe submitted the Did o~ $71,640.00 ~or contract W82-~6C/6(~)~361, installation of wate~ lln~s in ~en~ralia Gradenm based on ~chedule "B" using p.V.C, pipe; and further the soord transferre $74,409,08 fr~m 380-1-69064-439~ to 350-1-62361-4393 includes a 18% ~ontingency and transferr*4 $4,350~92 from 380-1-610Q~-4393 to 38~-1-62361-4~95. Vote: Unanimou~ On motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. DanieL, the 5card authorized the Chairman an~ County AdminiskratO~ to execute o% the following owner~: Cli£ton F., St. and Patricia L. Lee S~l-53C/Ta Shirley P. Speaks S81-53C/6a Lennoz b., Jr, and Delor~'B. walden SSl-53C/aa Vote: Unanimous Mr. Painter presented hhe Board with a lis% Of developer water and g~wer centractm executed by %he County ~dministzator~ ~ir. Painter mtoted thai he had mubmi~ted a letter o~ resign&ti01 to the County Administrator end the Board which indicated ho would be retiring on December 3t, 1982 a£~er mervlng the County 26% years. Mr. ~edrick read th~ letter Qf resignation. HR stated that tbs Utilities Department had grown from 33 employee to t81; that there were 6,900 water custum~r~ and now there are 36,000~ %hat there were no sawer customers and now there af~ 82-35~ 14. 2g,O§O; that eh~re wac a budget of $210,000~ and now it is $11,000,000+, He added Mr. Painter had been an asset to the COUnty during the changing of the system. Mr. Bookman stated the County ha~ one of the best utilities systems because of Mr. Painter aud expressed hi~ appreciation and best wish~s tO him. Mr. Dodd stated that Mr. Painter had from time to time "saved the Board members from %kems~ives" in the direction given. He stated that he reqreted ~r. Painter's leaving and asked that he cen~ider serving az a consultant in the future. Mr. O'Neill stated Ghat Mr. Painter we~ an example cf the ty~e of employee that wes needed in government--one who put the taxpayers and th~ ~ob fir~ and foremost. He wished Mr. Painter much success in his future retirement. Mr. Daniel stated that even though he had not worked with Mr. Painter for many years, he aDpreciated the assistance given. He sta~ed further t~at th% COunty Administrator should try to find a r~placemsnt for Mr. Painter prior to December 31~ 1982. ~rs. Girone expressed her appreciation to Mr. Painter ~or the assistance rendered to bmr in the ~ast years. ~Ir. ~e~rick advised the Boar~ that the ~ighway Department had officially notified the County that the follo%;ing roads were formally acc~te~ into the State Secondary eys~em effective as indicated: ~ Brandermill, Watch Hill ~eetisn (8-2-82) Watch Hurbour Road - B~ginning at the intersection of Hsrbuur ~ointe Road and going ~.~7 mile ~outherly tO the intersection with Watch Hat,our Court, then 0,08 mile southerly to intersection with itself and continuing in a circular direction for 0.24 mile rein=erseet with itself. ~.39 mi, ~atoh ~arbour Ceurt - Beginning et intersection with Watch ~arbour Rca~ and gulng 0.07 ~ile westerly ~o a cul-de-sac. ~.07 mi. ~randermill, eagewood Section, Phase I Sagewo~d Road - Beginning at its knters~ctien with ~randermill Parkway, State Rout~ 1921~ and going 0.O2 mile nertheest~rly to int~r~ection with Road. 0.02 mi. Sag~grove Road - Beginning at.intersection with Sage~¢eod Road and going 0.03 mile southeasterly to intersection with Saqegrove Cifcl~ then continuing 0.05 mile southeasterly tO a cul-de-sac. 0.08 mi. eaqegr0ve Circle - Beginning at its intersection wi~h eagegruve Roa~ and going 0.03 mile north~$terly to inter~ection with i~self, %hen continuing in a ¢izcular direction for 0.12 mil~ to r~intersect with itself. Q.15 mi. Br~ndermill Barbour Points Road - Beginning at its intersecti0n with Earbour POints Parkway and going 0.06 mile north- westerly to the intezsection with Hsrbeur Bluff =hen continuing 0.05 m~le northwesterly to ~nt~rsestion with Earbou~wQe~ Aced then ~outhwester[v 0.23 mile to intersection with Rockport Lending Read=and then mi. continuing O.O4 mile southwesterly to intersection with Watch Earbour Road. ~a!nut Creek Road - Deglnning at its intersection with Brandermzll Parkway and going 0,08 mils easterly to iDtersection with WalDut Creek Court, then continuing 0.06 mile eamturly to intersection witk Walnut Creek circle, then continuing 0.04 mile easterly to intersection with Walnut Cre~k Circle, then 0.09 mile to a cul-de- sac. D.27 mi. Walnut Creek Court - ~eglnnlng at its intersection with Walnut Creek Road and going 0.05 mile southerly to a cul-de-sac, 0.05 mi, Walnut Creek circle - Beginning at intersection with Walnut Creek Road and going 0.10 mile in a circnlar direction to ~eintersect with Walnut Creek Road. 0.10 mi. ~rand~rmiI1 (8-3-82) Brand~r~ill Parkway - Beginning at the end of Stat~ maintenauce, $~ate Rou~e 1921, and going 0.09 mile northweeterly to the intersectie'n with ~alnut Creek Road, then continuing 0.01 mile north- westerly to tie into proposed Brandermill Parkway e~rended. 0.10 mi. ~randermill, Executive Center S~otion (8-3-82) West village Green Drive - A circular road beginning where State maintenance ends, State Route 1892~ and going 0.05 mile southeasterly to the intersection with the 56 foot ingress right-of-way, then continuing ~n a circular dlrectio~ fur 0.19 mile northwesterly te intersection with West Village Green Drive, State Route 19~2. 0,24 mi, 50 Foot Ingress Right-of-way - Beginning at intersection with Hull Street Road, U. S. Route 368, and going 0.02 mile northwesterly to its intersection with West Village Green Drive. 0.02 mi. Rrand~rmill westerly to istersection with proposed Crosstinlbers Road. 0.14 mi, Rrandermill P~rkway, St~t~ ~oute 1921~ an~ going Road, then uontinues 0.04 mile southwesterly to mile southwesterly to intersection with Long Gate Roma. 0.23 mi. to a cul-d~-~mc_ 0.2~ mi. cul-de-sac. 0.03 mi. Fairg~te goa~ - Bggin~ing at intersection with Buntgata Woods Road and going 0.07 mile southeasterly to a cul-de-sac. 0.07 mi. Meeting Gate Road - Beginning at intersection with guntgate Woods Road and going 0,06 mile easterly to intersection with Meeting Gate Ceurt. 0,06 mi. Meeting Gate Court - Beginning at intersection with Meeting Gate Road and going 0.04 mils southerly to & cul-da-sac~ Again, Meeting Court, beginning ~t ~.ntersection with ~eeting Gate Road and going mile northerly to & cul-de-sac. Q.07 mi. ~ran~armill, ~arbourweod Section ~srbourwood Road ~ Buginning at its inter~etioD with Harbour ~ointe ~oad and going 0.04 mile southerly to intersection with garbourweod Court~ then continuing 0.03 mile southerly to intersection with Harbou~weod Place then continuing 0.11 mil~ soutkerly to a Harbou~ood Cnurt- Beginning at its intersection with Karb0urwood Road and going 0.04 mile easterly to a cul-de-sac. 0.04 mi. Harbourwo0d Place - Beginning at its intersection ~ith ~arbourwocd Road and going 0.09 mils westerly to a cul-de-sac. 0.09 mi. Brandermi!l, RockPort Landing Section (5-3-82) Rockport Landing Road - ~eqinnlng ut its intersection with Harbour Points Road and going northwesterly to intersection with Rockport Landing Place, then mile northwesterly to intersection with Rockport Landing Court then 0,0% mile northwesterly to cul- de-sac. 0.19 mi. ROckport Landing Place - Beginning at i~s intersection with Rockport Landing Road and going 0.lO mile northwesterly ~o a cul-de-sac. 0.10 mi. Rockport Lan~inq Court - Beginning a% its intersection with Rockport Landing Rea~ ~ud ~oing Q.05 milo southerly to a cul-de-sac. 0.05 mi. Brandermill, ~arbuur Bluff section ~arbour Bluff Roa~ - Meginning at its intersection with Rarbour Points Road and going 0.01 mile northerly to inte~eutlcn with Harbeur Bluff Place, then continning 0.05 mile northerly to intersection with Harbour ~lu~f Court th~n continuing 0.03 mile inortherly to intersection with ~arbuur ~luf£ Tartans. 0.09 mi. Harbour Bluff ~lace - Beginning at its intersection with Harbour Bluff Road and going ~0.07 mile easterly tca cul-de-sac. 0.07 mi. ~a=bour Bluff Court - ~eginning at its intersection with Barbour Bluff Road and going 0.05 mile easterly to a cul-de-sac. 0.05 mi. Harbour Bluff T~rraco ~ Beginning at ~te intersection wi=h Harbour Bluff Road and going 0.67 mile northeast- erly tO a cul-de-sac. Again, beginning at its intersection wi~h Rarbou~ Bluff Road and going 0.07 mile soutkwasterly to a cut-de-sac. 0.14 mi. g2-S61 BrandermilI, Carriage Creek section ($-4-~2) Carriage Creek Lane - Beginning at intersectian with Bandyridge Parkway and going .03 milo northeasterly to intersection with Carriage Creek Road, then continues .01 mile northeasterly to a dead end. 0.04 mi. Carriage Crge~ Read - Beginning at intersection with Carriage Creek Lane an~ going .0S mile northerly to intersection with Carriage Creek Place, then continues ,03 mile northerly to intersection with Carriage Creek ~ourt, then continues .09 mile northerly to a cul- de-sac. 0.17 mi. Carriage Crmek Place - Beginning at intersection with Carriage Creek Road then going .03 mite westerly to a cul-de-sac. 0.03 mi. Carriage Ct%ak Court - Beginning at intersection with Carriage Creek Road and going .06 mile easterly to cul-de-Sac. 0.06 mi. Brand~mill, The Oaks Section Shadow Oak~ Roa~ - Beginning at intersection with North Beaut Road, State Rout~ 2907, and going .07 mile southerly to a cul-de-sac. 0.07 mi~ Broad Cake Road - Beginning at intersection with North Beach Road~ State Route 2907, and going .06 mile north- easterly to intersection ~ith Broad Oaks Cou~t, then continues .07 mile northeasterly to a cul-de-sac. 0.15 mi. Broad Oaks Court Beginning at intersection ~ith Broad Oaks Road and going .06 mile northwesterly to a cul-de-sac. 0.06 mi. S~readlng Oak Road - Beginning at intersection witA North Beach Road, State ~oute 2907, and going .01 mile northeasterly to intersedtxon with S~rea~ing Oak Court, ~hen continues ,09 mile nertAeast~rly to a cul-de sac. 0,06 mi. SpreedLng Oak Court - Beginning at interseotion with Spreading Oak Road and going .0~ ~ite northwesterly to a cul-de-sac. 0.05 mi, Brandsrmill Harbcur Pointe Parkway - Beginning at its intersection with Hull Street Road, U. $. Route 300~ and going mlle westerly to intersection with ~arbour Peinte Rcad~ then 0.02 mile w~terly to a d~ad end. 0.48 mi. Dupuy Cour~ Walker kvenue - Beginning at the intersection with Dupuy ~oa~, State Route 11~6~ and going northerly 0.12 mile to ~ie into existing Walker Avmnue, State koute 1198. 0.12 mi. ~atthallmill, S~cticn 4 Rebel Ridge Road - B~qinning at the en~ of State maln~ained Rebel Ridge Road, Stats Route 1093, and running westerly 0_20 mile t~ end in a dUi-de=sac. 0,~0 mi. Severlv Acres, Section ~ gernetta Lan~ - Deginning at the end of Stets ~aintained Vsrnotta Lanu~ State Route 1345, and running northeasterly 0.06 mile to the int~r~ecti©n with ~dwin L~n~h Lsne, then continuing northeasterly 0.03 mil~ to end in a cul-de-sac. 0.09 mi. ~dwin Lane - Beginning at the intersection with Vcrnetta Lane and runnin~ nerthwestezly 0.1I mile to end in a cul-de-sac. Again, Edwin Lane beginning at the intereection with Vernetta Lane and running southeasterly 0.07 mile to end i~ a cul-de-sac. 0.1~ mi. StonemilI, ~ection B Stone River Boa~ - B~glnnlng a% its inter~ection with Stone River Road, existing State Rout~ 2718, and Marwood Drive~ Stat~ Route 2518, an~ extending southwest 0.1I mile tu the intersection of Stone River Court. 0.1t mi. Stone River Court - Beginning at it~ intersection with Stone River Road an~ extending northwest 0.03 mile to a cul-de-sac. Again, beginning at its intersection Stone River Road, and extending southeast 0.09 mile to a cu!-ds-sac. 0.12 mi. Braebreok Village Braebroek Drive - Beginning at its intersection with Branders Bridge ~eed~ State Route 625~ and r~nai~g southwesterly 0.24 mile to the intersection ~ith Braebrook Court, then continuing southeasterly 0.19 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. 0.43 mi. Braebrook Court - Beginning at its intersection with Braebrook Drive and rnnninq westerly 0.05 mile to end in & Cul-de-sac. 0.0~ mi. 01d Creek West, Section 2 Old Creek Road ~ Be~inoiug at its inter~ectien with We~t Road, ~tate Route ~37, and Old Cremk Road, State Route 2222, extending $outhmast 0.06 mile to the intersection of Lightwood Court then southeaa~ 0.03 mile to proposed Old Creek Read, Old Creek We~t, S~ction ~. 0.09 mi. Lightwood Court - Beginning a= its inter~ection with Old Creek Road extending southwest 0.06 mile cul-de-sac. 0.06 mi. Chester Station, Section~ A & S (~-9-~2} Chester Station Drive - ~eginnlng at the intersection with Chester Road, State Rout~ 144, and running southeasterly 0.16 mile to =he intersection with Ceaa~lin~ Circle, then continuing gouthaaaterly 0.06 mile ~o th~ inTer~ection w/th Railgate Terrace, continuing southeasterly 0.08 mile to ~nd in a cut-de-gao. 0.30 mi. Coastline Circle - Beginning ak the intersection with Chester Station Drive and running northeasterly mile to end in a cul-de-sac. 0.05 mi. Railgat~ Terrace - Beginning at the intersection with Chester Station Drive and running northeasterly 0.05 mils to end in ~ cul-de-Sac. 0.05 mi. Three Pines, section 1 ~Iountain Pine Boulevard - Beginning at its intersection with Hicks Road, S~ate Rou~e ~47, ~xtending 0.18 mile to the inte~sction of Spruce Pine Drive, then north 0.05 mil~ to the intersection of g~hite Cedar Lane 82-362 Length then north 0.02 mile.to a dead end. Spruce Pine Dr~ve - Beginning at its intersection with Mountain Pine Boulevard, extending west 0.09 mile a cul-de-sac, White Cedar Lane - B~ginning at'ira intersection with Mountain Pine Deulevard, extending easterly 0.24 mile to a cul-de-sac. 8.24 mi. Walton Oak, Sections G, H and I (8-9-82) Watch Hill Road - Beginning where $=ate maintenance ends, State Route 10S4~ and going 0.18 mile southerly to intersection with Watch Hill Court then c~ntinuing 0.11 mile southerly tc intersection with Road. 0.29 mi, Queensgate Road - Beginning at intersecti0u with Watch Dill Road and going 0.4t mile westerly to tie into ~xis~ing Qu~negate Road, State ~Oute 1385. 0.41 mi. Na%c~ Hill Court - ~eginning at inter~uction with Watch Hill Road and going 0,0~ mile easterly to a cul-de-sac. 0.05 mi. 5ilm&r, Section A ~i~mar Drive - Beginning at the intersection with Beulah ROad, Stat~ Route 641, and running northerly ~.06 mils to =he intersection with Yellowl~af Drive, then Continuing northerly 0.07 mile to the inter- section with AutktT~l~af Drive, then continuing northerly 0.21 mile to the intersection with ~interlmaf Drive, 0.34 mi. Yellowleaf Drive - Beginning at the intersection with HiLuar Drive and running westerly 0.O~ mile to a dead end, 0.03 mi. AutuI~uleaf D~ive - Beginning at th~ intersection with Hilnar Drive and ru~uinq westerly 0.03 mile to a dead end~ again, Autumnteaf Driv%, beginning at %he inter~ ~ection with ~ilmar Drive and running easterly 0.03 mile to tie into e~istinq Autu~leaf Drive, S~ate Route 1972. 0.06 mi. Wint~rlea~ Drive - Beginning at the intersection with Kilmar Drive and running easterly 0.04 mile to tis into existing Win=erleaf Drive, State Route 1973. Again, Winterleaf Drive beginning at the intersection with Eilmar Drive and running westerly 0.03 mile to dead end. O,O? mi. Sussex E~at~ (8-9 82) Sueeek Drive - Beginning at its in=ersection with ~ewby'a Bridge Road, State Route 649~ extending ~oHth~rty 0.09 mile to the intersection o~ Sussex Court, =hen southerly 0,06 mile to the intersection of Su~ex Place, then southerly 0.10 m~le to the in=ersecticn of Kempwood Drive. 0.25 mi. Sussex Court - Beqinninq at its intersection with Sussex Drive, extending northwest 0,05 ~ile to cul-de-sac. 0.05 mi. Susse~ Place ~ Beginning st its intersection wi~h Sussex Drive, extending northwest 0.08 mile to a 82-3~3 0.09 mi.. O,OB mi. ~en~th Ke~pwood Drive - Beginning at its intersection With SUSsex Drive, extending northwest 0.04 mile to the intersection of gempwood Place, than 0.85 mile to %he intersection of Kempwood Court, than southwest 0.05 mile to a cul-de-sac. 0.14 mi. K~mpwood PLace - Beginning at its intersection with Kempweod Drive, extending northeast 0.05 mile to a cul-de-sac; a~ein, beginning ah its intersection wi%h Kempwood Drive, extending southwest 0.07 mile to a cul-de-sac~ 0.12 mi. Kempwood Court - Beginning at its intersection with ~mpwoQd Drive, extendin~ nOrtheamt ~.07 mile ~o a cul-de-sac. 0.07 mi. Colonial Pin~s Estates, Section C (8-13-82) Julep Circle - Beginning at the intersection with Julep Drive, State Route 1196, an~ runglng north- easterly 0.!7 mile to end in a cai-dm-sac. 0.17 mi. Foxbrook Drive - Beglnninq at the intersection with Julep Drive, State Route 119~, and running northeast- erly 0.20 mils %0 the intersection again with Julep Drive, State Bcut~ 1196. Again, Foxbrook Drive, beginRing at the intersection with Julep Drive, State Rout~ 1196, and running westerly 0.64 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. 0.24 ~i. On motion Of Mr. Daniel~ seconded by Mr. DodO, the Board went into Executive Session to discuss legal matters regarding 1-295 issue and disposition of publicly held property as )ermitted by Section ~.[-344 (a) (6) eno (2), respectively. ?ore: Unanimous Reconvening: ~r. O'Neill made th~ following statement: "The Board will defer until its first meeting in September, a final decision on ~h~ther to file suit against the State to stop hhs eastern location for 1-295. The Board WOuld ~xpsct that ail parties to the controversy will realize that litigation is not in the best interests of either the State or th~ affected area ~re fully explored, the County has appointed a committee to confer with the City of Richmon~ to disease acceptable alternativez to an eastern route. The co~mittee will be composed of the County Administrator, the County At:orn~y and John W. ~'ardeman of Williams and Connelly of the Washington, D. C. law firm retained by the Coun~F. In the event that the continues to ignore the legitimate needs of the area and the ~Onomic realities of building an eastern route, the County will also discuss joint litigation utrat~qy with the City if the State forces the County to file suit." ~2S031 [Amended) In Midlothian Magisterial District, ~idle~hian ~nterprises r~ques~e~ rezoning frc~ Residential (R-40) to R~sid~ntial Townhouse-Por-Sale (R-TB} of 46.I7 acres; office Business (O} of ~9.00 acres? Convenience Business (B-l} of 16.7S acres plus a Conditional Use Planned Development encompassing the entire 166.14 acres to permit use and bulk e×ceotion~ to the requirement cf the ZOning Ordinance on a parcel fronting approximately 3,700 ft. on Hu~mot Road also ~ronting approximately 2300 ft. on Robious Road an~ located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of th~se roads and better known as Eelgrade. Tax Map 82-36& g-12 (1) parcels 3 and 4 and Tax Map 9-9 (1) parcels 5, ?, and ~ {Sheets 2 and 3). Mr. Balderson stated the applicant had ~e~uested a ~0 day deferral of this request. There was no opposition present. On motion of Mrs. Giron~r s~oonded by Mr. Dookman, the Board deferred consideration of this case until September 22, 1952. Vote: Unanimous In Dale Ma~istmrial Distxi=t, Bill W. Spenoe, sr. and Linde W. Spence requested a ConditiOnal Use to permit a real estate office in an Agricultural {A} District on a .968 acre parcel fronting approximately 100 feet on the east line of Turner Road and lecat~ approximately 300 feet north of its intersection with Jessup RDad. Tax Map 51-7 (1) parcel 43 (Sheet l~). ~. Bmlderson stated the applicant had requested a 30 day deferral of this request. ~here was no Opposition presmnt. On motion of MS. Daniel, seconded by M~r. Dodd, the Board deferred consideration of this mass unail September 22, 1982. Uot~: Unanimous 828059 (Amended] In Ctovsr Hil~ Magisterial District, W. F. Wright requested a Conditional Uae to permit a cement ~anufacturing facility in an Agricultural (A) Pistrict on a 2 acre parcel fronting approximately 50 ~eet on the northeast line of ~arbro Road and located approximately 3000 feet northwest of its intersection with tull Str~t Road. Tar Map 48 (1) part oi parcel 16 {Sheet ~r. Balderson ~tated the ~tanninq ComD%ission had recommended denial of the ori~inal request for straight zoning and had reconm%ended approval of the request for a Conditional Use with the noted conditions. Mr. Paul Sunday was present representing the applicant and stated the conditions were acceptable. Mr. Bookman stated he felt a plan of development for the satire area should be ~eeiqned. Mr. ~nnd~y s~ated that they are working on this. After further discussion; it ~as on motion of Mr, Bookman, seconded by ~rs. Girone, resolved that this request for a Conditional Use be approved subject ~O the following conditions: 1. This Conditional Use shall be granted for th9 purpose of operati~ a concrete hatching business. 2. A fifty (59) foot buffe~ consisting of existing shall be maintained along Warble goa~. With tka exception o£ a single access driveway, there shall be no clearing or ~rading in the buffer area. 3. Hours of operation shall be confined ~o between 7:00 a.m. and 6:09 p.m~, Monday through Saturday. Sunday operations shall DOt be permitted. 4, The entrance onto Warbro ~oad shall have a minimu~ radius fifty I50) feet and shall be constructed to the Specifications. 5. The above stated conditions notwithstanding, ell bulk requirements of the Light Industrial {M-l) District Shall he applicaDle (i.e., one parkin~ space for each employe~, drive,ay width~ ~etba~ks, ~2 365 The above ~tated ~ond~t~ons no~w~th~fsndin~ th~ ~ite plan prepared by J. ~, Tigons & A~s©ciates, Inc., dated ~/10/82 shall be considered the plan of development. $2Sg72 In Bermuda ~gist~rial District, Larry L. Zehm requested rezOninq from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7) of a 2.951 acre parcel fronting appro×imately 220 fast on the north line of B~rgess Road, and located approximately 770 fe~t nor~hea~h Of its intersection with East Eundred Road. Tax P~p 136-5 (1) Parcel 15 sheets 43/44}. Mr. Baldergon ~te~ed the Planning Commission had recommended approval of this request. Mr. Zel%m stated that he would be buildin9 a house in this area. Mr. nodd inquired if rezoning to ReSidential {R-9) would be acceptable in order that the zoning would be consistent with other property in the area. ~r. Zehm stated thin would be accepta~l~. There ~a~ no opposition present. On motion of Mr. Dodd, ~econded Dy Mr. Daniel, the Board approved the rezoning from A~rioulhu~al (A) to Residential 82S035 In Midlothlan Magisterial District, H. Louis $atomonsky requested re~oning from Agricult~ral (A) to Office Eueiness (O) of .75 Road and located app~nxfmstely 500 feet ~outk of its Tax Map 17 9 (2) Avon ~gta%e, Lot 11 (Sheet of land. Mr. Balderson stated he knew %bo applicant had tried in the deferrals. There was no One present representing the case. ~. O'Neill ~xcus~d himself from ~he me,ting during the discussion of th~ followin~ ca~e ~ his wife works for one of the principals, even though h~ has no finanoia% interest in this matter. 82sOaO requested a Conditional Use Planned Development to ~ermi% the vehicles in a Residential IR-7) District on a 1.S acre parcel frontin~ approximately 200 feet on the we$~ linc of Iron Brid~e Road and located approximately 2,600 fe~t north of inter~ection with Lewis Road. T~ Map tt4-1 {1) part of parcel $~eet 31). Mr. ~alderson ste~ed the Plannin~ Commission had reconmnended approval of thi~ request. Mr. C. F. Currin was present and stated the condition~ were acceptable with the amendment of ~4 as reconunend~d by fh~ Planning Commission. There wa~ no opposition present, on motion of Mr~ Dodd, seconded bv }{r. Daniel, the Board approved this request subject to The ~ellowing conditions: 1. The below stated conditions notwithstanding, the site Dian submitted with the application, doted February 5, shall be considered the plan of development. 2. A turn lane twenty-six (26) feet from the centertin~ of the ssuthbaund lane of ROuts 10, with curb and gutter, shall be constructed along the Route 10 frontage. This lane shall be constructed to VD~I&T s~and~rds and taken into the State system prior tO the issuance of an occupancy p~rmit. A single access shall ba permitted to Route 10. This access shall be located at th~ ~outhernmost property line and shall be constructed so as to p~rmit shared access with futura development Of the adjacent property to the south. six (6) feet of pavement and curb and gutter shall be ~onetructed for the tength of tho property along th~ new public road to VDH&T 5. All vehicles awaiting repair or pick up upon completion of repair shall be conPined to the area located on the ~outhside oi the parcel and to tbs rear of the convenience store. This area shall be scre~ne~ from view of ~oute A specific scre~niug plan shall be submitted to the ~lanning Co.~missien for approval in conjunction with final s~ts plan submission. 6. There shall b~ no junk ears stored on the prsmise~. 7. The building to be constructed shall be of material~ other than cinder block of metal. The ~pecifiu design an~ color~ ~hall be approved ~y the Planning Cor~mission in ~onjunction with schematic plan review. One freestanding sign shall be permitted to identify this use. The total aggregate squar~ footage of sign~ shall along Rou~ lO. ~usinesz signs may be illuminate~, but shall not be luminous. Prior to erection of any signs, colored ~endarings shall b~ submitted to the Planning Department for approval. ~. A site tandmcapinq plan shall b~ submitted to the Planning Commission for approval in con~unction with schematic plan shrub~. I0. The abov~ stated conditions nOtWithStanding, all bulk requirements of a Convenience Business (B-l) District shall be applleable. Ayes~ ~s. Girona, Mr. Bookman, FzT. Daniel e~d ~r, Dodd. Absent: Mr. O'Neill. Mr_ O~Neill r~turned to the masting. ~2S041 In Matoaca Magisterial District, ~arry R. Mason, Jr. requested Conditional ~Se Planned Development to permit a boarding house for more than nine t~nants and ~×cep~ions to ~he bulk requirements of the Zoning Ordinance in a Residential District On a .46 aero parcel fronting approximately 85 feet on the northeast line of Third Avenue and located approximately feet northwest of its intersection with Boisssau Street. Ta~ Map 182-18 (2] ~oissaau, Let 35A Ieheet 53/54). 82-367 Mr. DaIdersen stated the Planning Commission had approval Of thi~ request ~u~jec~ to csrtain conditions. Mason was presen~ and stated the conditions were accap=able. Mr. O'Neill inquired if Mr. Mason would pave the aras with asphalt and leave =he trees if given 18 months tO accomplish this work as he felt the area needed te be improved. Mr. Mason stated he would agree to these Suggestions end stated that it would reduce the parking spa~e$ from 28 to 14 as required by the Planning Com~]ission. Mr. 0'N~ili inquired what surrounded t~is preperty~ Mr. Mason stated there was a boosters club house and two rental houses. Thar~ wa~ no opposition present. On me=ion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by ~rs. Sirens, the Board approved this request sub~ect to the following conditions: 1. This Conditional U~e shall be granted to and for Barry R. Mason, Jr. and shall not be transferable nor run with the land. 2. A minimum of one (1~ parking space shall be provided fez each ~wo (2) students. 3. AIl ~arking and driveways shall he paved with asphalt w~thin 18 ~onths from date of occupancy and the trees in the area shall be maintained in their existing state. 4. The above stated conditions notwithstanding, the site plan prepared by Richard A. ~rist0w, dated February 9~ 1981 revised March 1, 1982, ~hall be c0nsi~ered the plan of development. 5. Nc signs id~ntlfylng ~his use shall be permitted. 6. In conjunction with the granting of thi~ request, the Pla~ng Ce~tmission shall grant ~che~ic plan approval Of the plan submitted with the application. 82~061 (Amended) In Bermuda Magisterial District, William K. and Tens Miller re~uested a Conditional Use to permit a 2 family dwelling in a Residential {R-7) District oua .74 acre parcel fronting approximately 1~0 feet on ~orth Enon Church Roa~ ~lee fronting approximately 175 feet on 9erkinson Drive and located in the no~thwes~ quadrant of the intersection of these reads and better known as 13730 North ~non Church Read. Tax Map 135-4 {3) 9erkinson Heights, Dleck A, Lot 11 (Sheet 42). Mr. ~alderson $tated the Ptannih9 Commission had r~commsndsd approval of this request ~ubject to certain cendi~ion~. There WaS ne Oppesltion present. Mrs. Miller was present and stated by MI. Daniel, the Board approved this requs~t subject to the 1. This Conditional Use shall he granted t~ and for William K. and Tins Miller, exclusively. I% shall not be transferable nor run with =he land. (2} separat~ and independent 4welling unit~. residential appearance; specifically, ~hutter~ shall be plane Drive. 82-36~ Plumbinq fixfures in the third kitchen shall be r~moved before any occupancy permit is granted. 5. A minimum Of four (&} parking spates shall be Drovided. These spacer shall be graveled with a %21A econo having a minimum depth of four (4) inches, The parking area shall be defined by use of railroad ties er eimilar curb stops. 6. Any area no~ used for driving and parking shall be cultivated and maintained as a grassed lawn. 7. This Conditional USE shall be granted for a period not to exceed ~ive (5} years. At that time, upon satisfao~ary reapplication and demonstration that this use hae not been detrimental to the adjacent properly or surrounding area, it may be renewed by the Board of S~9ervisore. Vote: Unanimous ~2SO74 In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Pelf Construction ComDany, Inc. requested resoning £rom Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7}, plus a Conditional USe Planned Development %o permit living units for the elderly and an exception to the bulk requirements of the ZOning Ordinance relative %o the number of parking spaces required on a 11.01 acrs parcel fronting approximately 55~ f~t on the east line of Turner Road and located appro×ima~ely 650 feet north of its interaeetion with Cloverleaf Drive. Tax Map 29-1 (1) ParQels 18 and 2~ (Sheet M~. Bald~r~on stated the Planning Commission had reooraraended approval of thi~ request ~ubjeot to Certain conditions. Mr. Jeff Retcliffe was pr~ent and stated that the plans are now to cuns~ruct a fear story building, rather than three, thereby reducing the length of the structure. Mr, Beoka~an inquired about the facade of the buildlng. Mr. Rateli£fe stated at thi~ poiut they w~re not sure whether it would be stucco, brick, etc. Mr. ~ookman inquired if the change in etructure would increase Or decrease the number of r~idents in the home. ~r. ~atcliffe stated the number Of residents would r~main the same. Bookman requested that the shrubbery not be stripped and ~hat they maintain existing vegetation. Mr. Ratcliffe ~t~te~ they planned to d~ that ~a well as haYa individual plots of ground for =usidents to have qarden~. After further discussion of matter, ~t wa~ Qn motion of Ma. Bookman, seconded by Mrs. resolved that thi~ request be approved subject to the following Conditions: 1. ~h~ below s~at~d conditions notwi~hstanding~ ~he ~i%e plan s~mitt~d wi~h the a~plication, dated ~/9/82, ~ntitlad "Hearthstone, Che~t~=field County, Virginia~~ shall b~ considered the plan of development. Any $tructure placed on th~ parce~ ~kall ba similar in design ~o that deDicted in the renderings submitted with the application. The facades of the building shall employ subdued color~, and the colors shall be approved by ~lanning Department, ~= the tim~ o~ ~inal ~ite plan 3. Ther~ shall be only one {1) access permitted to Tu/n~r the locatiOD Of which shall be aDproved by VDH6T. This access shall be designed ~o as to afford the best sigh~ distance as posrible. 4. Parking shall be provided at ratio of one (I) spnc~ for each t%'o bedrooms. $ixty-~o (62) y=ars of age or older_ 82-369 Only One (!) frae standing sign identifying this use shall ba peY~itted. The sign ~hall blend with the architectural style of the prepose~ structure amd may bu illuminated but shall not be luminous. Prlcr to erecting the sign, a rendering shall bc submitted to the Planning D~partment for approval. ~. In conjunction with the granting of this request, schematic plan approval shall be granted. The proposed structure shall not exceed a height of four (4) ~torias. rote: Unanimous 12S076 in Clover Hill Magisterial District, Brande~mill requested an ~×ception to a previously granted Conditional Use Planned )ev~opment (Cass ~74SS21~ to permit drive-in/fast food ~estaurant~ within all B-i Districts. This request encompasses ~ha planned development of BrandermilI which liem on the north .ina of Route 360 and southwest of the intersection OX Coalfield ~nd Genlto Roads. Tax Map 61-12 {1) pakeels 1 and 6; Tax Map 62 [1) parcel 20; Tax Map 36 (1) parcel 4; Tax Map 47 (1) parcel~ 6 [nd 9; Tax Map 61 (1) parcels 6, 8 and 9; T~x ~4ap 46 (1) parcels 12-1 and 23-1; Tax Map 6!-16 (1) parc%l 5 (Sheets 13 and 20). ~r. Ral~erson stated ~he Plannimg Commission had recommended [pprovaI of this request subject to certain conditions. Mr. J. ~. Campbell was present an~ stated the cendltlons were [ccsptable. There was no opposition present. 0e u lotion of Mr. ~ookman, seconded by ~rs. S~ron~, th~ Board approved this request lubject to the following conditions: This amendment shall be limited to fes~ foo~ restaurants only {i.e., diners, grills, luncheonettes, sandwich stand~ Short Order curds). Drive-in restaurants shall nc~ be permitted. Such facilities shall bs confined to the principal ~hopping c~nter building and shall not h~ freestan4ing structures. This amendment shall be limited tO the Convenience Business (~-1) area adjacent to Route 360. .te~ Unanimous Ir. Dcdd inquired if there were a possibility the applicant in he next case were planning to purchase a mobile home from :ompany. The applicant stated he was not ~ure. Mr. Dodd excused i~self from the meeting %o avoid any possible uonfllct of interest. In ~atoaca Magisterial Dis:riot, FLY. and Mrs. Michael Gray requested rezoning fro~ Residential {R-15) to Agricultural ?.33 acre parcsl fronting ap9roximatel~ 50 ft. On thu w~t line Rhodes Lane, measured from ~ point appxcximatsly $,0~0 ~aet ~est of its intersection with Sandy Ford ~ad. Tax Map 160 ~arcel 96 (Sh~t ~pprovaI of this ruque~t. ~r. Gray wa~ present. ~r+ O'Neill ~nqulred why this request was being made for Agricultural (A) ~ezoning. ~r. Gray stated that his wife is an Animal ~ontrol )fficer and has mere than two dogs on thc premises and in an %gricultural (~) District this would be p~rmittcd. T~ra was no ~ppo~ition ~resent. On motion of Mr. O'Neill, ~econded by )anis1, the Board approved this reque=t. ~2-370 Absent: ~Ir. Dodd. In Midlothian Maqisterial Oietriet, K. Louis Salenonsky requested reze~ing ~rom Agricultural {A) to Office Business (0) of .7~ acres and to Community Business {B-2) of .5 acres of a parcel £rontinq approximately 100 feat on the weft line of Branchway Road and located approximately ~0O feet south Of it~ intersection with Midlothian Turnpike an~ better known as 900 Bran~hway Road. Tax ~p 17-9 (2} Avon Estate, Lot ll {sheet Mr. balderson stated the Planning Commission had recommended approval of this r~c~est. Mr. ~4ark kxcell was present representing :he a~plicant. E~ staled others wer~ supposed to p~esent bu~ w~re not but that he would try tc answer any questions that the Board night have. Mrs. Girene inouir~d if ~he developer had attempted to worA with otbe~ property owners to design a plan of development for the area since t~ere ar~ ~o many long narrow parcels which could possibly ali request access to Courthouse Aced. Mr. ~aldersan stated that he knew ~h~ developer had attempted but failed to purchase at least one other parcel. ~r. scot,an and Mrs. Gircne indicated their concern tha~ there comld be several entrances/exits to Courthouse Road. Mrs. Girone requested that Mr. A~eell express the Board's conc~cn r~garding th~ accesses to ~. Salomon~ky. After further discussion of the matter, i~ was on motion o~ ~rs. Girone~ seconded by Mr. resolved that this r~que~t be ~pproved. Ayes: Mr. O'neill, ~$. $1ron~, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Daniel. ~$ent: Mr. Dodd. Mr. DC~ r~t~rned to the ~eeting. ~s. Girone ~tated that several y~uru uso the Board approved opa~ation of a landfill by Calcour% Properties on Oldbury Road. She stated since chat ~ime, Ryan ~om~ has constructed ~7 homes in the i~diate area, She stated that there are a 10%~ of kids in the area, there will be 100 loads delivered within the next three day~, the trucks are causing potholes, etc. She stated that she would like the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors fu x~uonsider the case under the conditions (fur example, hour~ of operation, ~%C.) which exist today as those which were require~ then do not suffice. Mr. O'Neill stated did not feel a neighborhood should be able to cause change because they were opposed to something bu~ he also understood $hanges in the urea could affect a Conditioual Use which is not Mr. Cal SearCh and informed him of thm BOard's intention to work ~ith him regarding this mattmr. After further discum~ion~ the ~lanning Director imfo~ the operator of the landfill they are to cease op~ratio~ until th~ case can b~ reheard by the Planning C0~isslon and the Board of Eupe~isors which should be ~dvertised ~imultan~eusly for the earliest possible date. kyso: Mr. O'Neill, Ers. Gizone, Mr. ~oo~an and Mr. Daniel. ~bstention: Mr. Dodd. Zr. O~Neitl informed the Beard that the Ladies' Auxiliary for the Phillips Volunteer Fire ~epartment had won Best Appearing Ladies' Auxiliary at the annual Fireman's ConferePce keld in S2-371 On motion o~ Mr. Dodd, seconded by ~Ir. Daniel, the Board adjcurnmd at 3:~0 p.m. until 10:00 a,~. on September S, 1952. Rfc~aYd- L. - Medrick COUntM &dministrator E. Mer~fin O'N-ei]l,"Sr. ' Chairman ~2-372