Loading...
09-22-1982 MinutesSeptember 22r 1982 Supervisors in Attendance: Mr. E. Merlin O'Neill~ Sr., Chairman Mrs. Joan Girene, Vice=Chairman Mr. C. L. Bookman Mr. ~arry ~, Daniel Mr. R. Garland Dedd ~. Richard L. Hedrick County Administrator Staff in Attendance: Mr. Stanlny Ral~ereou, Dir. cf Planning Mr. Elmer C. Hedge, Asst_ Co. Administrator Mr. William R, Dir., ~eneral Servlcee Mr. Richard Sailfish, Mr~ Rober~ A. Pain=er, Col. Joseph E. Pittman, Chief Of Police Sheriff E. L, Wingo~ It is here noted that the adjourned meeting scheduled for S~ptember 14, 1982 was cancelled. 5~. O'Neill called the meeting to order ah th~ Courthouse at I0:00 a.m. {EDST). Mr. Dodd gave the £nvocatlon~ On motion of Mr. Bookman seconde~ by ~. Daniel, the minutee of September 8, 1982 were approved, as amended. Vote: Unanimous ~r. Masden announoe~ that the Cont~unity Smrvices selected Dr. Bert Lowe as the new director of Mental Bealth/Mental Retardation and he would begin work in Chesterfield on Nov¢~r 1. Dr. Lowe is currently Director of North Suffolk ~ental Health Association in Boston/ Massachusetts. ~e has a B.S. in M~th and Computer Science and a M.A. and Ph,D. in Clinical P~chology. Mr. ~asden added that coming back to Virginia. He also ~hanked the Boar~ for =heir thoughtful selec%ion of %kc members of the Community Services Board and stated that it was a good working Board. Mrs, Pat Johnson stmhed she had h~n a~ked by Marian Mahou of the ~erican Red Cr~ss to inform the Board of the 4th Annual Seulthfest sponsored by ~IBT/~ ~he American Re~ Creme and Slue Cross/Blue ~hicl~. This event will bm held at the Richmond Arena 9n Saturday, OctOber 9, 1982 from 10:OQ a.m. to 6=00 p.m. MS. 7ohmsen further crated that the Chesterfiei~ Chapter cf the Red Cross would be involved as wsl! as the Henrico and Richmond Chapters. ~_r. Masden Presented the Board with e report th~ ~ursing Home had )tapered to analyse what could be done due to efforts by the 82-3E3 $431,00Q def£cit this year and $1,0Q0,QQ0 defioit next year in the Nursing Home budget, Mr. Daniel stated he felt it was important to have an audio record of the proceedings of ~he Board meetings, Ne ~taCed ~ch systems are in place in cthe~ !oealities, ~ven those smaller than Chesterfield, Es further stated that he under~tood at One t~me Chesterfield Cablevi~ion wa~ interested iA %aping the profleedings of the Doard meetings and a~ked that they be contacted to d~termine if there wa~ ~till an interest. ~e stated fa[~her that the recordings cf the Board meetings were not to be u~ed as a autherised the County ACtmini~trator to spend up to $5,000 on the availabl~ for us~ at other public ~eeting~ upon request. Vote: Unanimou~ ~r. Hedrick stated that this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing tO cen~ider restri~tiag ~hrough truck · nquired if ~r. Dodd had reviewed the petition he had ~ubmit~ed Osborne Road. Mr. Williams s~ated Old Stage Road. Mr. Hedges ~tat~ that 01d Stage Road w~s mostly mn industrial ar~a with On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Highway complete any f~rthe~ procedures necessary ~or thc r~striction of Avenue and ~io Vista Street between Route 1 and the Richmond-Petersbur~ Turnpike. conflict of interest as his son has financial obligations with Mr. Eedrick stated that thi~date and time had b~an scheduled for new qarage and th~ property was being conveyed to ? & M Leasing fa~ity was paid for, ~itle would revert ~ack to the County. authozised the County Admln~strator and Chairman to execute the Vehicle ~aintenance Garage is located to F & ~ LeasinG Corporation ~uring the te~m of ~he lease. Ayes; Mrs. Girone, ~r. Daniel and Mr. Dsd~ Absent: Mr. O'Neill a~d Mr. BOOkman Mr. He,rick coBgratulated Mr. Hodge on hie efforts in arranging the financing for the Garage. Mrs. Girone thanked ~r~ Hodge .for a job well done. . limn. O'Neill and Mr. Eookman returned be the meeting. Sherif~ Wingc was present to discuss the proposed increase in fees from $~.~O to $1O.OO Der day as well as billing any medicml expenses to the locality which had transferred the prisoner for housing out of Ceunty inmates at the County jail. He stated that and the average charg~ per day in other localities wa~ $12 and that Chesterfield is currently well below that average. Sheriff ~inge also sba=ad that the charge per day for a juvenile in the detentiun home is $21.50, but if ~he sa~e person were ~raneferred to the jail, the charge per ~ay wonld decrease to Daniel inquired if the $12 per day average charge included medical expenses. Sheriff Wingo stated it did net. Mr. O'Neill ~sked %.hat the actual cost per day was to house a Dri~onero Sheriff Wingo stated he did net have ~xact figures. Mrs. Qirone asked if there was a legal limit on what we could charge othe~ lucalltles. Sheriff Winqo ~tated we can charge no more than the actual cost to the County per day. ars. Girone in~uired if the mutual cost could be billed ~or each prisoner asd Sheriff Wings ~tated they neede~ a uniform cost. Dn motion e~ Mr. O'Neill, seconded by ~r. Dcdd, the Board ]enerally agreed to defer this item until the nexU Board meeting to allow staff time Co compile accurate actual ce~ts per ~ay to ~ouse a prisoner. ~. Hedrick complimented Sheriff Wingo on bringing ~his matter tc ~he attention ef the Board. 3attalion Chief Elmwiek of the ~ire Department was present to ~nswer questions regarding adoption of an ordlnanca j~venil~s to participate in the activities of volunteer fire companies. Mr. Daniel inquired if this woul~ require written parental consenh. Chie~ ~lswick stated it would. Mr. Bookman stated he did not feel the County ghould a~opt an ordinance which required an individual tO have passing grades a~ a requirement to ~erve. Mr_ Micas stated hu had a~vised the Fire Department of that point and th~ proposed ordinance would be amended to reflect that change. It was agreed tha~ if the Volunteer chiefs Association wished to impose such a requirement, the Board would have no objections, but ~hey di~ not feel it should be part of the County Ordinance. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the board set October 27, 198~ at 10~00 a.m. as a public hearing ~a~e ac consider an ordinance to amend th~ Code of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, by adding Section 9-1 relating to participation by juveniles in activities of volunteer fir~ companies_ chief Pittman ~au pressnt and stated that the ?alice Department had been working with the towing contractors througk their representativ=~ }ir. Raymond ~evener, to e~ablish a towing agreement and ~he proposed agreement before the Board had the aqreemept to be mc~e specific. Mr. O'Neill expressed concern over the definition of a standard wrecker. ~rs. Girone stated ~h~ ha~ spoken with a wrecker operator in Bon Air and he had indicated that he was pleased that the Police Department was a~dressing this matter with a standard bdt'lng agreement. B2-385 Mr. O'Neill indicated that Item #t8 needed additional clarification prohibitinq employment with towers of CountV employees or reis,lyes. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mrs. Girene, the Board approved the agreement for specifications for towing within Chesterfield County subject to the aforementioned change in Item votel Unanimeus MS. Marie BEaut, Chairmen of the Community Services Board, was present to discuss the proposal to request funds from the State Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation to fill service gaps in Mental Heal%h, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse. She stated that on September 20, the Community Services Board had met and confirmed Dr. Bur, Lowe as the new Director for Mental Health/Mental Retardation an~ that ~r. ~as~eu had copies of his resume' available for the BOard upon request. ~s. BEach stated that the reason for the request for gad funding from the State ~as the emphasis on e-~nst~tut~onal~zation at the State level, putting the burden for care back an the local co--unity. Sh~ ~tated that Chesterfield ha~ a good chance of re~eiving the State fundinq necessary to fill these gape in servi~e. Ms. Reach sta~ed that =he Community Services Board was ~ekinq a total of ~sEd to establish new positions and he questioned what would ~appen if State fundiDg were cut off. Ms. Beach ~%ated that moat likely the fun~ing would continue, but if the State should reduce funding~ that issue would have to be addressed at ~hat point in ~ime. Mr. Boo,man questioned the success oi the apartment ~rOgrams for the mentally retarded. Ms. Reach ~%ated they had ~eon very successful. Mrs. Girone inquired if the apartment program was only for the mentally retarded and Ms. Beach stated ~s~urEd her that i~ would. ~utb~rized the County Ad--isis,rater to apply and accept, if 1. A Transitional Apartment Pro,ram for six mentally ill 2. The pu~ehase of impatient dekox and residential ~ervices ~arly intervention services for developmeDta!ly delayed infants in conjunction with prevention activities directed towar~ mental retardation. requesting the lease of additional spaEe for the vocational services.program dueto projections of an increase of 24 additional work. Services at 7529 Whitepine Road, which lcasm will be ~pproximately $3.15 per square foot and which f~nds will be paid 5y ChesterfiEld Vocational Services from the increase in 82-396 10. 11. On motion of the ~oard~ the following resolution was adopted: The Board of Supervisor~ of Chesterfield County hereby reguests C & P T~lephons Company to expand the 7~4 t~lemhene to includ~ the 748 telephone zon~ a~d thereby allow local dialing calls throughout Chesterfield County. Pu~thermore, capabilities and ~ffi¢iency. On motion of Mrs. ¢irone, seconded by Mr. Bookman~ the Board accepted the second low bidder, Anchor Pence Company, in the amount of $10~289 to per~orm the fencework at ~ugusnot Park, Phase ~% with ~aid fund~ coming from the approved grant from the Commission of Outdoor Recreation. ~h~ reason fer acceptance of second low bidder is that ~ho !ow bidder, Laodes Construction, requeAted withdrawal of their bid due to the length of time that ~his ~ay the County Enviroa~ental Engineer, in accordance wi~h directions from this Beard, made report ~n writing upon hi~ examination of Glenpark L~ne and Glenpark Court in WaI~Qn Park, a portion of Section D and Section F, Midlokhi~n District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mrs. Girone, ~lenpark Court in Walton Bark, a portion of Section B and Section F, Midlothian District, be and they hereby ara ~stablishad as it further resolved, that the Virgznia' Denartment of Highway~ and Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to ~ake ihlO the Secondary System, Gl~npark Lane, beginning at inter~ectien with Gtenmeadew ~ourt, State Rout~ 1079 ~nd goin~ .08 mile northerly to intersection with Glenpark Court, then continues .13 m~le northerly to a temporary turnaround; Glsnpark Court, beginning at intersection with ¢lenpark Lane and going .03 And be it furthe~ rssQlved, that the Board O~ guarantees to the Virqinia Department of Highways a 50' riqht~of-way for Glenpark Lane and a 40' ~ight-of-way f~r Slenpark Court. ~hese sections of Walton Park are recorded as fellows: Section D, Plat BOok ~2, Page 77, December 4, 197~ ~ection F, Plat Book 39~ Page 46, ~L~roh 2B~ 1981 SoLe: Unanimous £~ was generally a~re~d that Nfs. Girone would ~erve as the ~r. Dodd indicated ~oncern ~egarding the donation of funds to 4aymont in the future. )n motion Of Mr. Bookman, ~econded by ~, Daniel the Board reappointed ~. O'Neill, ~-r. william Gill, Fir. Michael Du~u$, %. L. Gayie, Dr. Fred Nichola~ and Mr, Redriek t~ the Appomattox ~asin Indn~trial Development Commission until September, ~r. Prank G~e~ Resident ~nglneer for the Virginia D~partment of ~ighways and Transportation, was pr~ent. Ee stated that ~ogbill Road and they were expected tQ be completed by the middle ~f ~Ov~er. H~ also statmd that upon checking his records, it 82-387 12.B. was found that the Highway Department had responsibility for maintenance Of the 01d Stone Bridg~ on Jeffersen Davi~ HiGhway that had been brought fo his attention; funds have been ailocated for the wayside and maintenance work bas bean scheduled to make Mr. Daniel stated these had been an accident recently at %he intersection of Turner and Belmont Road~ that could have resulted in a fatality. He requested Mr. Gee investigate the Dossibillty of inst~lling e traffic light. Mr. Bookman stated that during the time this intersection was part of hie distriut, three resolutions had been sent t~ the Mighway Department requesting a light be plac~d at that losation and that he would support a ~h resolution. On motion of ~ir. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Bookman, the Beard requested the VDH&T investigate the pussibillty of installing a traffic tight at the intersection of Fir. Dodd showmd 5Lt. Gee a picture which appeared in the newspape~ of the recent logging truck spill on the Appomattox Riser bridge. He SUggested that a reduction in the speed limit coming down the hill in the ar~a of the ~chool may help this situation somewhat. Mr. Gee ~ta%ed the Highway Department was ~tudying the problems relating to this bridge and that in this in~kence~ the problem was due to an insecure load on the logging truck, which is a problem on all COunty roa~s. Mr. Dedd stated that on Chester Road northbound to Jefferson Davis Highway, ~her~ is a bad curve in the road and he felt the 55 mile per hour spe~d limit was excessive, He also ~tated that ~he ~ridge over Proctor's Creek in the vicinity O~ Ross Ford was recently the scene of an accident when an automobile hit th~ side of the bridge. ~e stated there is not sufficient room outsid~ of 2he lame on each sid~ of ~he bridge and he asked if it would be possible to widen the bridge 4-5 feet or install reflectors. Mr. ~ee ~tated ha would lock into this ~atter. Mr. Bookman stated he did hot have any problems et this time. Mrs. ¢irene informed M.r, Gcc tha~ he would be receiving a Iett~r from her in the next few days stating he~ concerns. ~he thanked Mr. Gee for the Rebioue Road pavement job and stated it was working well and for the work done in Huguenot Park. }Aw. O'Neill %hank~d Mr. Gee for the help on Sylvania Read. He mentioned to ~ Painter An~ Mr. Gee that when E. River Road was ~aved after the ~ewer wark, he wanted it supervised clesely to insure that it wa~ done properly as this is a high traffic ar~a. On motion of ~. Daniel, seconded bv Mr. Dodd, the Soazd approved the installation of a street light ~t the intersection of ~opkine Road and Alfaree Roa~ with all associated co,ts coming from the Bale District Street Light ~und. On ~otiQn Qf ~s. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel~ the Board approved the installation of street light at the intersection of McRae Road and Bullington Road on the ~xi~ting pule, a~bject to it~ meeting th~ street light criteria, with all associated costs coming from the Midlothian District Street Light Fund, Ayes~ Mr. o'Neill, Mrs. Giron~, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Dodd Kr. Bookman returned te the masting. On motion of Mr. O'Neil!, seconded by Mr. DodO, the Beard appropriated $16,50Q from the General Pund Contingency account for the completion of the roads in Che~din H~ights subdivision and further authorized the 0Quntv A~ini~trator to enter into a contract with ~he firm o~ APAC o~ Virginia for the completion of ~e road and drainage work in Ch~edi~ Heights ~ubdivlsion for an Ir_ O'Neill asked if the roads in Chesdln Eeights would be taken nfo the State System by November 1. Mr. McElfish stated %key ould be ~aken in by Novembeg 15 at the motion of Mr. O'Neill, ~conded by Mrs. Qirone, the Board ~thoriz~d th~ County Administrator to enter into a con~ract with :he firm Of Piedmont C~nstruction ~ompany, 5noorperated, for the ~onstructien of ~ttrisk Drainage Project~ Phases 1, 2 and ~, Part II, in an amount not to ~xceed $10~,1~8.12, with the ~igaing of :hi~ contract contingent upon the County'~ ~eceiving a signed :ontraot from BUD guaranteeing ~he additional second year funds, ;hich funds are to be expended from 330-t-94301-4593 at thi~ ~. Balder~on was present and stated the Board had recmive~ topics Of the p:oposed Chesterfield Plan for ~ublic knd they were bmiag r~queeted 60 refer this plan io ~o~ission fo: their cor~Onts. Mr. Balder~on stated ~noe :he ~lannimg Co~tmission had approved the ~ocument~ it would come back ~0 ~he Board of Supervisors for their comments o~ aD, royal. Mr. [edrick mtated that when County offioial~ had mmt with Moody's .nd Standards and Pours in New York, they had stated that this yp~ of planniDq is imperative in order to maintain a high bond a%inq. Qn motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by ~r. Daniel, the Board aqua,ted the ~lanning Commission to con~ider th~ ChesterfleI~ 'lan for Public Facilities dr~ft and make a reco~enda~ioh to the .oard of Supervisors. Ute: Unanimous r. Painter presented the Board with oodles of the Water and ewer Financial Status and Developer ~a~ex and Sewer Contracts. n motion of ~r. Bookman, seconded by ~s. GirQne, the Board dopted the following resolut~on~ RESOLUTION ~D ORDER TO A~ANDON A PORTION OF TU%FORD upervisors dated Februa~ 12, k97~ the Board re~uez~d tka% the rirginia D~partm~nt Qf Hi~hway~ and Transporiation acce~t WHE~A$, by resolution o~ the Virginia D~partmen= of ghways and Transportation Co~ission dated ~y 1, 1975, Tuxford 'emained in the State Secondary System o9 5ighways un,er the ~ontrol, =upervision, management and juri~dic=ion o~ the Virginia 'apartment of Highways and Transportation~ ~E~S, Colonial Crafts Construc~io~ Co., Inc., who owns eel e~tate ~djoining Tuxford Road~ petitioned th~ B~erd uxford Road, ROUt~ 25D1, pursuant to Sec%ion 33.1-151 of the ode of Virginia, 1950, as amended; wH~S, p~rsuant to a resolution cf thi~ ~oaxd ~n Au~umt bandon a portion of Tuxford Road, Rou[~ ~5~1~ have be~n given in hat; on August 12, 1982, a notic~ was p~ted in at least three ~2-3~9 ~nd September 15, 1952, a nntioe was ~ublished in th~ Richmond News Leader, having general circulation ~ithin the County? and, on Auqust tt, 19~2, a notice was sent to the Co~is~ione~ of the WHEREAS, no landowner aifec~ed by thc proposed abandonment has filed a petition for a public hea~ing; ~R~AS, ~he safety and welfare of aha public ~ould be b~t 2501~ as a public road will not abridge the rights of any citizen. Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, %hat pursuant to Section ~.1-151 of the Cede of Vlr~inie~ t950, as amende~, the A portion of Tuxiord Read, Route 2501, within Shenandoah, and Associates, dated De~e~ar ~1, 1974, & cop} of which is at%ached to thi~ Resolution and ©rder. ~3.t-t53 of the Code of Virginia, 1~50, as amended, is that Accordingly, the Ct~rk of this Board shall send a certified copy of ~his Resolution and Order, to,ether with the plat hereto Section 33.1-154 of the Cede of Virginia, 1950, as amended, that 5ppreved a request ~or a eredi~ estimated ~o ~e between $3,50Q proper~y and by insfalling the 8-1rich line now, the expenditure wil~ not ~e duplicated and [he church perking lot ~ill net have submitted the low bid of $25,50~.16 f~r con%tact W82-60C/6(8)260t, installation of water lines in ~elght~ based On Bid Schedule "B"; an~ further the Beard appropriat~d $2~,~44.44 from 563 snrolus to which include~ a lQ% contingency and'transferred $1,Z09.0~ from 380-1-61000-4393 (fire hydrants) to 380-1-61601-4393. 17. On motion of Mr. Dodd, secundeO by Mrs. Girene~ tbs Board approved and authorized the COenty Administrator to execute any necessary documents ~or Renbridge Building Systems, /nc., who w82-55C, the addition to the Swift Creek Water Plant of which f~n~s have prsviously been appropriated. Vote~ Dnanimous On ~otion of Mr. Do,d, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board approved and authorLzed the C~unty A~ministrator to execute necessary documents for Change O~der No. 51, for Felling Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant ~xpansion, 7O32-25 in the amount of $42,S87.I0 for which no additional funds need to be appropriated. Vote~ Unanimous On motion of Mr. Dedd, seconded by ~rs. Girone, the Board approved the charge off cf uncollectable water bills in ~he amount cf $12,612.~0 and uncoils=table sewer bills in the amount of $16,~73.47. The amount of the~e charge offs is approximately three-tenths of one percent of the total billings. Vete: Unanimous The follo~in~ dates wer~ ~et for work s~ssions~ September 30, 1~82, 3:00 p.m.: ~usiness License Tax October 13, 1982, 2:00 9.m.: Three Year Budget Projections in PreparatiOn ~or FY S2-8~ Sudget October 15, 1982, 2;00 ~_~.: Nursing Home All of the aforementioned work sessions will be held in Room 502 of the Administration Building. Mr. Hedrick advised the Board that the Highway Department had officially notified ~he COunty that the following roads had been formally accepted into the State Secondary SyStem effective as indicated= Length Ro×ahire, Section ~ Framer Drive - Beginning where State maintenance ends, Framer Drive, State Route 1223 ~ going 0.t? mile northwesterly to intersection ~ith Corner Rock Road. 0.t7 mile Corner Rock Road - Beginning at its intersection with Framer Drive and going 0.97 mile northeasterly ~o tie into e~ieting Corner Rock Road, State Route 728. 0.07 mile Mr. Eedrick presented the B~ard ~ith a somnary of Wurkmen's Compensation Claims E×p~rience,. 19~1-82 and an oi the County Group Health Program. r~lating to Police ~peoial ooerations and legal matters r~garding the Z-295 issue and ~itigati~n involving Williams vs. Count¥~ et' al. as allowed by Section 2.1-344 (u) (6)"~f th~ ~-~qinia. Reconvening~ 82SR091 tn Bermuda Magisterial Dis%riot, James and Helen Will~am~ requested renewal of a ~4obile Home Permit to Dark a mobile home 6, Lots I4 through 17 and bettor known as 3025 AlCott Road (Sheet Yhe applicants were present. There was no oppoeition pre,eat. Dn motion of M~. Dodd seconded by Mr. Bookman, the BOard approved this reque$; for a period of fiv~ years subject to the following standard conditions; ' [. The applicant must be tko owner and OCcupant of tko mobile ~. No l~t or parcel may be ~ented or leased ~or use as a mobile %Omc site, nor shall any mobile home be used for rental broperty. ©nly one (t) mobile home shall be permitted to bo parked on an individual lot or parcel. 3. The minimum ~ot size, yard setbaok~, reguired f~cnC yard, and ether zoning requirements of the applicable zonin~ district shall ba eo~plied with, except that no mobile home shall be located closer than 20 feet to any existing residenc~. 4. No additional permanent-typ~ living space may be added onto a mobile home. Ail mobile homes shall be skirted but shall not placed on a permanent foundation. Personal qcodu an~ shall not be stored underneath ~he mobile home. 5. $,~er~ public (County) water and/or sewer are available, they shall be used. 6. Upon ~eing granted a permit for a mobile home~ the applicant nu~ then obtain the necessary permits from the Building Inspector's Office. This must be done prior to the installation ~r relocation of the unit. 7. Any violation of the above conditions shall be grounds for ~evocation of a mobile home permit for a mobile home, ~ota: Unanimous ~25R092 In th~ Bermuda Magisterial District, Kendall Wilmoth requested ~enewal of a Mobile ~ema Permit to park a mobile home On property {hich belongs to ~g. ~ilmoth, his father. ~mx Map 98-7 {1) Parcel ~ and better known as 1700 Cox,ndale Road (Sheet ~he applicant was present. There was no Opposition present. On ~otion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by ~r. Bookman, the Board :his rcquest for a period of fiv~ years subject to the following ~tand~rd condftion~: .. The applicant mu~t be tko c~¢ner and occupant ef th~ mobile ~, Ne lot er parcel ~ay be ren~ed or leased for use as a mobile ~om~ Si~e, nor eha~l any mobit~ home be used for rental property~ Inly one (1] mobil~ home shall be permitted to be parked on an ndividuaI lot or parcel. The minimum lot size~ yard setbacks, required front yard, and uther zoning requirements of :he applicable zoning district ~hall be complied with, except that no mobile home ehall Bs located ~!o~er than 20 feet to any ~ieting residence. ~. No additioDal permanent-type living space may be added onto a 5obile home. Ail mobile home~ shell be skirte~ ~ut shall not be ~laced on a permanent foundation. Personal goods and articles ~hall no~ be stored underneath the mobile home. 5. Where public [Coanty) water and/ct sewer are available they ~hall be used. ' ' B2-392 6. Upon b~ing gzan~e~ a po~it for a mobile home, the applicant must then obtain the necessary permits from the Building Inspector's Office. This must be done prior to the installation or relocation of the unit. 7. Any violation o~ the above conditions shall bu creunds for revocation of a mobile hems permit for a mobile Vote: Unanimou~ In Bermuda ~aqistorial District, Mable S. Cook requested renewal ~f a Mobile Home Permit to park a mobile home on property which ~he owns, Tax M&p 81-16 (5) C~n~rat Park, Block 4, Lots 1 ~hro~qh 5 and bett~r known as 2S18 General Boulevard (Sheet 2~). 14s. Cook was pre~nt representing her request. There was no )ppositlon present. On motion of ~r. Dodd, seconded by ~eokman~ the Board approved this request for a per'cd Of five reams ~ubject to the following standard [. Tho applicant muutbs the owner and occu9ant of th~ mobile ~. No lot or parcel may be rented or l~ased for use as a mobile :ems site, nor shall any mobile home be used for ~antal proper~y. )n!y one {1) mobile home shall be p~rmitted to be parke~ on an ndividual lot or parc~]. ;. The minimum lot size, yard setbacks, required fro~t yar~, ~ther zoning requirements of the applicable zoning district shall ~s complied with, except that no mobile home shall be locate~ ~loser than 20 feet to any existing residence. ,. NO additional permanent=type living space may be added onto a ~obil~ home, Ail mobile homes shall be skirted but shall net be ~laced on a permanent foundation. Personal goods and article's :hall not be stored underneath the mobile homo. . Where public ICounty) ~=er and/or sewer a~e available, they hall be used. Upon b~ing granted a permit for a mobile home, th~ applicant ~ust then obtain th~ neoesaary permits fr~m the Building uspector's office. ?bis must be done prior to the' installation reloeatlc~ of the unit. ~, Any violation of the abov~ condition~ mhall be grounds ~or revocation of a mobile tome permit for a mobile home. Zeta: Unanimous ~25a094 in Bermuda District, Joel and DQrXs ~ess requested renewal of a ~bile Home Permit ~o park a mobile home On property which they ~wn. Ts× ~ap 97-4 (2) Central Park, Block 12, Lotz 6i through i4, 65B and 75B and better known as 102lQ ~randywine Avenue [Sheet ~he applicants were present~ Tbe~e war no opposition present. In motion of ~r. Dodd seconded by M~. Bookman, the Beard approved ~hi~ request for a fiv~ year period sub,oct to the following ~tandar~ conditions: The applicant must be the owner and occupant of the mobile NO lot or parcel may be rented or leased for use as a mo~ile omo site, nor shall any motile home be used £or rental property. ,nly one {1) mobile hems sha~l be permitted tu be parked on an ndividual lot er parcel. 3. The minimum lot ~i~, yard ~tback~, required front yard, ether zoning requirements uf the applicable coning distr~ct shall be complied with, except that no mobile home ~hall be locate~ closer than 20 £~e~ to any existing residence. 4. No additional permanent-type living space may be added onto a mobile home, All mobile homes shall bu skirted but shall not be placed on a permanen~ foundation. Personal goo~s and articles shall not be stored underneath the mobile home. 5. Where public (County) water and/or sewer are available, they 6. Upon being granted a permit for a mobile home, the applicant must then obtain the necessary permit~ from the Building In~Doctor'~ Office, Thin mu~t be done prior to the installation cr relocation of the unit. 7, Any violation of the above conditionn ~hall be ~reund$ for revocation of a mobile home permit for a mobile home. 79S~22 In Midlothian Magisterial Distri~t~ DONALD A. & ELIZABETH A~zicultural {A) plus a Conditional Use for busines9 and professional offices cna parcel fronting approximately lO0 feet on Buford Road and located approximately 450 feat south of its with Forest ~ill Avenue and be~ter known as Buford Road. Tax Map 10-~ (2~ Eon Air Knollut Flock 53, Lot 5 MT. Baldarson stated that the applicant had requested a 60 day deferral. ~r~. Girone staled she felt this matter ~hould be ~ealt with at the Beard~s next meeting. On motion of ~rs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, th~ Board approved the request for deferral un%il October 27, 1982. Vote~ Unanimous 81S148 In Clov~r Hill Magisterial District, STA~IE E. LYTTLE recuest~d Conditional ~se Planned Development to permit expansiok ~f an existing mobile home park to includ~ 31 additional spaces and to p~r~i~ exceptions to the bulk requirements of the ordinance on a ~.12 acre parcel fronting approximately 470 feet on the suuth line of Midlothian Turnpike and located approxi- mately 1800 feet west of its intersection with Wadsworth Drive. Tax Map 2B-I (l) Parcel 8 (Sheet Mr. Dodd excused himself from the mmstlng due to a conflict of in%erect as he had discussed with the applicant the possibility of sellinq him rental units to h~ bm placed on this property. Mr. Bookman eacuse~ himself from the meeting due to a possible conflict of interest a~ him dauqhter rent~ from the applicant. Zr. Bald~r~on Stated the Planning Commission had recci~mended approval of this request. Mr. Ted Harris was present to motion Of M~. Daniel, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board approval this request subject to the imposition of the following 1. This Conditional Use Planned Development shall be limited the expansion of ~h~ mobile home park to accor~moda~e a total of fifty-two (52} mobile homes. 2, All ~rive~ays shall be a minimum oS twenty-~our (24) feet width and shall be pav~d. ~, k!l mobile homes skull be located a minimum of fifty (50) feet from the right of way cf Route 60. Ail mobile homes shall be at leest twenty (20} feet £rom all driveways, sight (~} feet fro~ detacho~ enclosed Carports {garages) and sixteen {16) feet from any other mobile home or a%tachmen: thereto or other buildings. ;. A minimum of two (2] parking spaces shall be provided for each mobile home site. These spaces shall ha a minimum of 10 feet by 2O feet and shall be provided adjacent to the mobile hom~, but not within designated driveway a:aas. The storage and collection of refuse shall be managed so as not to create a health or ~ire hazard. All refuse shall be stored i~ fire proof, water tight, rodent proof containers which shall be provided in sufficient capacity end the park management shall be responsible for the collection and 7, FO~r ~4) Or more tie down rings shall be placed underneath the mobile home so that the area outlln~d by the tie down rings shall include not less ~han 400 square feet. The rings shall be anchored and the m~bile home appropriately attached thereto so 2hat the mobile ho~ tied to them will n©~ p~ll the rings out o~ the anchor when the mebils homo is subjected to wind gusts Of 75 miles per hour striking the mobile home broadside ~nd parallel to tho ground. All mobile homes shall be completely skirted. ~celve (I2~ ~set of paeem~nt, with curb and gutter, shall be extended from ~he Selden Skatewnrld property for a sufficient length acceptable to VDH&T along Route 60 in accordance with VDB&T requirements. This additional lane of pavement shall be COnstructed and taken into the State system prior to the release o~ the occupancy permit for additional mobile home Spaces. Th= above stated conditions notwith~andin9 the site plan s~bmitted with tho application dated Eeptember 21~ 19~1 shall bs considered the Master Plan. {NOTE: Plier to obtaining a building permit, $~hematic plan~ must be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval.) Mr. Q'NeilI, ~trs. sirens and Mr. Daniel Mr, Bookman and Mr. Dodd Bookman and }~r. bodd returned to the meeting. 2g03I Amended) In Midlothian Magisterial District~ MIDLOT~IA~ MTZ~PRISES requested rezonlng from ~ssidantial (R-40] to ~sidential Tow~house-For-Sal~ {R-TH) of 15.0 acres~ eno to ffice Business {O) of 45 agree plus a Conditional Use Planned ~velopmont encompassing a 16'6.14 acre tract to permit use and elk exceptions to the requirements of th~ Zoning ordinance. his parcel fronts approximately 3,7D0 feet on ~u~uonot Road, lac fronts approximately ~,309 feet on Rcbiou~ R~ad and is boated in %he northeast quadrant of the intersection of these ~ads and is bett~r known as Be[gre~e. Ta~ Map 8-t2 (1) Parcels and 4 and Tax Map 9-9 (1} Parcel~ 5~ 7 and 8 (Sheets 2 and 3). ~. Balderscn stated that tho applicant had requested s 60 day [eferrml. On ~otien cf }lr~. Sirens, Seconded by ~. Beckman, the ioard approved the request f~r deferral until November 24, 1982, s requested by tho applicant. 82-395 In Dale Magisterial District, BILL W. SP~NCE~ SR. ~ND LINDA W. SPENCE requested a Conditional Use to permit a real aa~at~ office i~ an Agricultural (A) District on a .968 acre parcel fronting approximately 100 feet en the east line of Turner ~oad and located approximately 300 feet north of it~ intersection with Jessup Road. Tax Map 51-7 {t) Parcel 43 {Sheet 15). Mr. Balder~on stated ~hah th~ applicant had requested a 38 day deferral'. On motion of Mr. DanieI~ seconded by Mr. Dodd, the ~oard approved the request for deferral until October 27, 1982, as requested by tho applicant. 82S071 Im ~a~oasa Y~glaterial District, LINWOOD F. B~LC~ER reques~e~ a Conditional Us~ to permit a borrow pit and a landfill in an Agricultural IA} District on a 7.5 acre parcel, which lies at the northern terminus of Belcherweod RDad. Tax Map 77 ~1) Part of Parcel 36 ($hset 2I). Mr. Balierson stated that the Ptunning Commission had race--ended approval of th~ r~cfues~ subject to certain conditions. Mr. Bob Beep was present to represent the applicant, He stated that the applicant was basically in agreement with the oondition~ as se5 forth by the Planning Commission, how~er ~ue to extenuating circumstances, his client would need more than 24 hears to requests~ in I~em ~15 a c~rtified report cn surfae~ and groundwater be submitted to th~ Planning Department, such a report co~ts approximately $3Q0 and ha suggested an annual report. Mr. Eal~e~S~n indicated he hsd no problem with these changes. There was no opposition present. On motion of Mr, O'neill, se0cnded by M~. Dodd, the Board appzovad this request subject to the following c~nditionm: 1. Th~ b~tow stated ~on~ition~ notwithstanding, ~he plan prepared by J. K. ~i~ons and Am~o~iates, date~ May 3, 1982, 2. ~y debris loea~ed within the exishin9 fill area which has th~ potential of falling due tO de~ay or washe~ away due ~o sh~I1 ~he slop~ b~ grea~er than l~:l wi~h a desirable slope Qf 2:1. Any additional fill activity ~hmll not oCCur until such time that detailed plans, showing a% least two (2) foot contours, are submitted tQ Environmental Enqineering for approval. 4. A plat ~howing th~ ~xRct metes and b~unds Q~ the fill area Planning Department ~hatl b~ recorded in th~ Cireuit Court 5. ~ri~r to any f~tker filling, brightly pain~e~ metal pipes, se~ vertically in concrete, shall be plac~d oD the site ~elineaEin9 the li~it~ of the fill area. 6. Fill material shall be limihed ~%usively ~o ~ci%, ~tone, rock, land cleared material, brick~ block, wood and 7. Revi~d plans shall d~lineate the limi:$ of the l~O year fl~d p~ain. There shall be no filling or ~rading within th~ limits of the flood p~ain, 82-396 events for the proper implementation of erosion control devices in conjunction with the plan of operation. Revised plans shall indicate the proposed operation for reshaping and ~tabitlzing the slope contiguous with Swift Creek. Construction of any facilitie~ over the fill area shall net be permitted unless soil engineering studies prove the feasibility of zuch construction. Further, this study shall prove that the surrounding area is suitable for the activities associated with any development On the property. Certified reports shall be submitted to the Planning Departnent in conjunction with the building permit application. 10. Witkin fourteen (14) days of the approval of thio revised plans depicting the above stated conditions shall be submitted to Development Review for approval. Work to accomplish approved slopes within the existing fill area shall commence within fourteen (14) days of the approval of the plan and shall be completed within ninety {90] days of approval of this request. 11. Upon stabilization of the existing till a~a'~ slope ~djacent to Swift Creek, the lsnd£ill activity may continue in accordance with the approved s~t of plans. 12. Hydrosendinq and mulching shall be c0~pteted within (~5) days after achieving finished grad~ or p~rformed in no le~s than one acre increments. t3. Prior to any further fill activity, a certified engineering report identifying th~ contents of the existing fill area shall be submitted to the Planning Department. completion of filling the respiting arco, a certified engineering report identifying the contents skall be submitted tO the Planning Department. 14. The access road into the site shall be secured wi~h a gate ~hich shall be locked. The gate shall be installed within fourteen (14) days of thc approval of this request. 1~. ~very twelve (12) months Stem ~he date of approval, a certi- fied report on the surface amd groundwater shall be submitted to the Planning Department. This report ~halt reveal that th~ l~ndfill has not resulted in the contamination o~ the surface and groundwater. Vc~o: Unanimous ~2S075 In Dale ~gieterial Dimtrict~ C~ESTERFIELD VETERINARY CLINIC requested a Conditional Uss Planned Development to permit veterinary clinic in a Residential (R~7) District, and an exception %o the bulk requirements of ~hs zoning or~inano~ relative to paving on a 1,52 acre parcel fronting approximately ~40 feet on the ~a~t line of ~epkin$ ~oa~, and located approximately 360 feet north of its intersection with Little Creek Lan~. Tax ~ap 5~-16 {1} Parcel I6 ISkeet 15). Mr. Bal~erson stated that th~ Planning Cem~]ission had reoo~tmended denial of thio request. Mr. Oliver Rudy was present representing the applicant. Ha state~ that the area in which thi~ w~ ruquested was undergoing a transition similar to that on Route 10 es you approach chester. He stated that the rseidential chmracterishics of the area could be maiDtained by using special exception and proposed conditions that Staff had proposed in the event thi~ request was granted/ in order to maintain the appearance of a residential area. Mr. Rndy stated that in some cases, th~ appearance of a profe$~i©nsl office was better kept up as opposed to the murroundinq re,ideates. ~e further ~tat~d the ~2-397 interest in purchasing the home ega residence ak this location. Ha ~tated tho applicant did no% plan to change the ~×terior, that it would be used similar to the existing operetloa in Chester~ a clinic with no boarding of anima%s or outside run~. %t was estimated there would be approximately 10-15 pa~_snts per day. He further stated that surrounding this home are a day care center, MCDonald's and a real estat~ office. Mr. Rudy further staled that Dr. Lyne~ the applicant, was a lifelong resident Chesterfield and tha~ his veterinary hospital had been annexed Dr. Lyn~ was present and stated that he would keep up the grounds. ~ stated that the owners o~ both aides had no objections to his usin~ this residence for his clinic. H~ ~tatmd %hat the opposition was from rosident~ who lived to the roar Of the dwelling and they were approximately l~ yards a~ay~ Mrs. Caroline Williams, ~be owner of :he property in question that several people had expressed an interest in her home end had trle~ to have it rezon~d~ bu~ so far these attempts had been unsuccessful. She stated that p~ople had expressed an interest in her home un~il she had given them the address. MS. Trisha Lchr~ President of the Fuqua Farms Civic Association was presenf ropresentin~ approximately 150 families in opposition to this request. She stated that she had personally talke~ ~¢ith 75 of these families and they were opposed to this proposed Many o~ the families are patrons of Dr. Lyne and respect him, but they don't went to ~ee this property rescued. She stated there is a traffic problem now and it will increase if a~other business locates in this area. She further stated that the Chester area roads are ~ere accommodating for this transition to business tha~ ~r. Rudy referred to earlier. She ~tated the ~opkins Koad area is too developed now and selling a home was a problem everywhere and this ~hould not be a fac=or in the rezonlng request. She stated ~hat this request was not in the best interest of ar~a, Mr. Elbert ~oward, a resident Of Cogbill Road was el~n present in opposition to this request. He stated that he was almost a mile away fro~ the property, but he felt that the Ptannin~ CoK~ies~on had established a precedent that this was to remain a residential ces~unlty and that rezoning of this property would lead ~o the death of this connnunity. }~r. Rudy spoke a~ai~ end stated that precedent should not always be the deciding factor. 14r. ~ookman questioned what the procedure was if an animal was brought in and wa~ too sick to ~e taken home. Dr. Lyne s~a~ad the animal would he transported in e van to the hospital. 5~r. O'Neill expressed concern that it would be very difficult to sell thio ~esid~nce for us~ a~ a home at this location. Mr, Daniel ~tated that he had reviewed the history of zoning along Hopkins Road. ~e noted that the Planning CommiSsion had recommended denial of zoning for the propsr~y on which the McDonald~ is located and the adjacent property. Re pointed out that if the Board had sustained the vote of the Plannin~ Commission, the Board would not have the problems that it is facing today~ therefore, he had no choice but ~o uphold the ~lan~ing Commission's recommendation this time for denial, on motion of Mr~ Danlel, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Beard denied this Ayes: P~r$. Girone~ Mr. Bookman, Mr. Daniel and Nr. Nays: Mr. O'Neill 82S0gO In Midlothian ~agisterial DistYict, COW$0LIDA?=D INDUSTRIALS, INC. requested rezoning from AgriCultural fA) to Office Business (O) plus a Conditional Use Planned Devetoument to permit a twenty-five (25) foot exception to the fifty (50) foot front yard ~etback for parking and buildings fronting on major ~rterials'on a .693 acre parcel frentin~ approximately 300 feet on Midlothian Turnpike, also fronting approximately 300 feet on Old Buckiugha~ Road~ and located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of these roads. Tax Map 16-9 (1} Parcel 19 (Sheet 7). deferral. There was no one p~e~nt to diseusu this matter. On notion 0£ Mrs. Girone, seconded by }~. Daniel, the Board approved the request for deferral until December 8~ 1982, an reques=ed by ~he applicant. In Mi~lethian ~agiaterial District, PEOFESSIOKAL [NC. requested a Conditional Use Planned Development te permit ~45 foot radio tower in a Residential (R-7) District on a ~cre parcel which lies a~pro×imately 430 fee~ off the east line ~f Old Ben Air Road, measure~ f~om a point apprc×tmat~ly 1,250 !eat berth of it~ interssction with Robious Roa~. Tax Map 17-8 :1) Bareel 34 (Sheet ~r. Bookman excueed himself from the meeting because cf a ~onfltet of interest as he has a fin~nclat interest in the .djoi~ing property zoned ~. O'neill e~cused himself from the meetlnq for personal reasons hat he did no% disclose at this time. tared that the applicant wanted to tract a 745 toot radio tower. e stated there was an existing 350' tc~ge~ on the property at his time that would be taken down if necesarry. H~ stated that hu tower will present has no advers~ effec~ and serves to mprove reception. He further stated that the applicant would ike to keep ~ke small tower in place, bu~ woul~ remove it if hat was necessary to have the larger tower erected. Mrs. tat~d that sh~ ~no%;s of ten towers in the Midlothian area now nd that 9inca this 350' tower was erected in 1965~ the urrounding area had changed and was now a residential eighborhood. It was slated ~kat the tower should b~ placed in he c~nter of the property so as to prevent it ~rom being placed Do close the the trailer pa=k adjacent to this prop~r~y. Dx of ~asy Communications was present and ~tated that the tower ~st be placed exactly us shown on the ~k=tch submttte~ with the )plicatien due Lo the height of the tower and placement of the ly wires. On motion o~ Mrs. ~irone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the pard approved this tannest ~ubject to the following conditions: This Conditional Use Planned Development mhelI be limited to erection of a 745 foo~ radio tower. Nothwithstanding the conditions stated her~in, the site plan submitted w/th the application shall be considered the plan of development_ The base of the tower shall be enclosed by a six (S) toot high fence aa as to preclud~ anyone frespassing and clicking In conjunction with the granting of thin request, the Planning Commission shall qraa~ schematic approval uf the plan ~ubmitted with theapplxcat~on.' Upon construction and Operation of tho proposed tower, exiating tower shall be removed. !s: Mrs. Girone and M~. Daniel ~$tain: Mr. Dodd O'Neill and Mr. Bookman returned to the meeting. Daniel excused hlm~elf from the netting. In ~idlothian Magisterial District, LEE FOODS, INC. requested an amendment to a previously granted Conditional U~e Planned Development {Case 805156) to permit luminous letters on a freestanding sign in a Con,unity Susiness {B 2} District On a .8! acre parcel frontin~ approximately 1,220 ~eet On the north line of Midl©thian Turnpike, also frontinq approximately 1,300 ~et on the sou~b line of Route 1004 and lyXng between th~ t~o r0ad~. T~x Map 15~11 (1) ~roeI 2 (Sheet 7}. Mr. B~tderson stated that the ~Iannin~ Cenn~is$ion had recommended approval of this request. 5~. Larry Dennison was present r~presenting th~ applicant. ~r~. girons Complimented Mr. Dennison on the appearanc~ of the existing s~oro. There was no opposition p~sent. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Bookman, the Board approved this regosst subject to the following condition: This amendment shall be applicable to the existing luminous ~igns. At ~ch time that the existing lnminou~ signs are replaced with others, the color~, lighting and design shall be approved by th~ Plannin~ Department, prie~ to their erection. Ayes~ ~r. O'Neill, Mrs_ Gir0ne, FLU. ~ookman and M~. Dod~ Absent: M~. Daniel Mr. Daniel returnsd to the meeting. It was ~enerally agreed the Soard would recess fo~ fiv~ ReconYening: Nk=. O'N~iI1 stated that during executiv~ session t~day %h~ Board had discussed litigation involving 1-295 and tha~ at this tim~ the floor would be open fQ~ discussion and inquired if the Board had any further co~ent~ to ~ke. that %ha County file suit in fs~era~ court to block the Mr. Dodd stated tha~ this d~oision ~a~ reached after muoh debate and this i~ the last opportunity for Chesterfield County obtain federal funds~ ~e further stated that it would ~e a mis%aka for Chesterfield county not to ~ak~ this attempt. O'Neill ~tated that he was on the Board in ~972 when all of thi~ issue and worked with the PleaDing D~par~ment and the Hiqk~ay should b~ %ok~n. The Board being polled~ ~he vo~e was as Mr. O'Neill - Aye ~r~. Giron~ - Aye Mr. Bookman - Aye ~r, Daniel - Aye Mr. Dodd - Aye On motion of Mr. Dani~lr seconded by M~. Dodd~ the Board adjourned until Sep~e~er 30, 1982 a~ 3:00 p.m. County Administrator Chairman