Loading...
07SN0341l~T~~~Aml,Ar 7(1 7Mr1 (~'l~(~' ~w~F~oc TIAnAm~Ar 1 Q 7M'7 (~'l~(~' !' ~ ~~ ~ ~ti, I rY~ ry ! ~;li ,~~~ l ,, ~ Ir~RGSI~1.P!!~ - ~ n v~r;~ 72 ~MQ RC ~--' , ~~o ~S ~MQ RC January 28, 2009 BS STAFF' S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 07SN0341 Acquisitions Plus LLC Bermuda Magisterial District Bellwood Elementary; Falling Creek Middle; and Meadowbrook High Schools Attendance Zones North and South lines of Gayland Avenue RE VEST: Rezoning from Light Industrial (I-1) and Residential (R-7) to Residential Townhouse (R-TH). PROPOSED LAND USE: Residential townhouse uses are planned. The applicant has agreed to limit the number of lots to 131, yielding a density of approximately 7.8 dwelling units per acre. (Proffered Condition 3) PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON PAGES 2 AND 4. STAFF RECOMMENDATION (NOTE: SINCE THE COMMISSION'S CONSIDERATION OF THIS CASE, STAFF' S RECOMMENDATION HAS CHANGED BASED UPON THE CASE NOW BEING SUBJECT TO INCREASED IMPACTS ON CAPITAL FACILITIES, AS DISCUSSED HEREIN.) Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service Recommend approval subject to the applicant fully addressing the impact of the proposed development on capital facilities. This recommendation is made for the following reasons: A. The proposed zoning and land uses conform to the Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan which suggests the property is appropriate for residential use of 2.5 - 4 units per acre, with higher residential densities permitted under certain circumstances. B. The proffered conditions do not adequately address the impacts of this development on necessary capital facilities, as outlined in the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the needs for roads, schools, parks, libraries and fire stations is identified in the Public Facilities Plan, the Thoroughfare Plan and the Capital Improvement Pro ream, and the impact of this development is discussed herein. The proffered conditions do not mitigate the impact on capital facilities, thereby insuring adequate service levels are maintained and protecting the health, safety and welfare of County citizens. (NOTE: CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED OR THE PROPERTY OWNER(S) MAY PROFFER CONDITIONS. THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.) PROFFERED CONDITIONS (STAFF/CPC) 1. Public water and wastewater shall be used. (U) (CPC) 2. The applicant, subdivider, or assignee(s) shall pay the following, for infrastructure improvements within the service district for the property, to the county of Chesterfield prior to the issuance of building permit: A. $15,600.00 per dwelling unit, if paid prior to July 1, 2007; or B. If payment is made after June 30, 2007, the amount approved by the Board of Supervisors not to exceed $15,600.00 per dwelling unit adjusted upward by any increase in the Marshall and Swift building cost index between July 1, 2006, and July 1 of the fiscal year in which the payment is made. C. Cash proffer payments shall be spent for the purposes proffered or as otherwise permitted by law. 2 07SN0341 JAN28-BOS-RPT D. Should any impact fees be imposed by the County of Chesterfield at any time during the life of the development that are applicable to the property, the amount paid in cash proffers shall be in lieu of or credited toward, but not be in addition to, any impact fees, in a manner determined by the County. (B&M) (STAFF/CPC) 3. The maximum density of this development shall not exceed one hundred thirty-one (131) lots. (P) (STAFF/CPC) 4. Except for timbering approved by the Virginia State Department of Forestry for the purpose of removing dead or diseased trees, there shall be no timbering on the Property until a land disturbance permit has been obtained from the Environmental Engineering Department and the approved devices installed. (EE) (STAFF/CPC) 5. No drainage from impervious areas shall drain to the northern property line. (EE) (STAFF/CPC) 6. All exposed portions of the foundation of each new dwelling unit shall be faced with brick or stone veneer. Exposed piers supporting front porches shall be faced with brick or stone veneer. (BI & P) (STAFF/CPC) 7. Prior to any traffic generated by this development accessing through the adjacent property to the south (Bellwood Apartments), Noel Street (from Jefferson Davis Highway to Marls Road) and Marls Road shall be improved to VDOT standards and taken into the State System. (T) (STAFF/CPC) 8. A six (6) foot solid fence shall be installed within the required buffer along the northern property line. The exact design and treatment shall be approved at time of site plan or subdivision . P review. ( ) (STAFF/CPC) 9. Prior to subdivision plan approval, the owner or its successor shall submit a security plan that at a minimum shall include a plan for phased implementation of security measures and periodic security plan review to the Chesterfield County Police Department for review and approval. The department's review may include, but not necessarily be limited to, the type, frequency and severity of crime at the property to determine if the plan requirements should be modified up to and including the owner or its successor entering into a contract with the county or other approved entity for providing on-site security personnel. The owner or its successor shall implement the approved security measures based on the 3 07SN0341 JAN28-BOS-RPT approved security plan. The security plan may be modified with approval from the Chesterfield County Police Department. (PD) (STAFF/CPC) 10. All roads that accommodate general traffic circulation through the development (the "Public Roads"), as determined by the Transportation Department, shall be designed and constructed to VDOT standards and taken into the State System. (T) GENERAL INFORMATION Location: North and south lines of Gayland Avenue, east of Jefferson Davis Highway. Tax IDs 792-678-1855, 2312, 2756, 3614, 3859, 4762, 5018, 5765, 6322, 6667, 7626, 7770, 8673 and 9532; and 793-678-0077. Existing Zoning: I-1 Size: 16.9 acres Existing Land Use: Single family residential or vacant Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North - R-7; Single family residential South and East- I-l;Two-family residential or vacant West- R-7; Single family residential 1 ITTT ,TTTF,~ Public Water System: There is an existing sixteen (16) inch water line extending along the east side of Jefferson Davis Highway approximately 500 feet west of the request site. In addition, a twelve (12) inch water line extends within an easement along the eastern boundary of this site. Use of the public water system is intended. (Proffered Condition 1) Per Utilities Department Design Specifications (DS-21), wherever possible, two (2) supply points shall be provided for subdivisions containing more than twenty-five (25) lots. To provide two (2) supply points for the 120 units proposed with this development, 4 07SN0341 JAN28-BOS-RPT connection will be required to the sixteen (16) inch water line along Jefferson Davis Highway and the twelve (12) inch water line adjacent to the eastern boundary of the site. Public Wastewater S,, sue: The public wastewater system is available to serve this site. There is an existing ten (l o) inch wastewater collector line extending along Gayland Avenue adjacent to this site. This line is made of terracotta (clay) and precautions should be taken when working around this line. This ten (lo) inch line connects to an existing eighteen (18) inch wastewater trunk line that extends within an easement along the eastern boundary of the request site. There also extends along Gayland Avenue a twelve (12) inch wastewater line carrying effluent from DSCR (Defense Supply Center Richmond) and Rayon Park Subdivision to an existing metering station located on the northeast boundary of the request site prior to discharging into the existing eighteen (18) inch trunk line. Use of the public wastewater system is intended. (Proffered Condition 1) A hydraulic analysis must be made to determine the available capacity in the existing wastewater lines. Staff anticipates that this site will be served from the existing twelve (12) inch wastewater line providing adequate capacity and depth of the line is available. ENVIRONMENTAL Drainage and Erosion: The subject property drains to the east under the CSX Railroad and Interstate 95 directly into the James River. The majority of the property is wooded and, as such, should not be timbered without obtaining a land disturbance permit from the Department of Environmental Engineering. This will ensure that adequate erosion control measures are in place prior to any land disturbance. (Proffered Condition 4) There are currently no on- or off site erosion problems, however a portion of the property has been used by all-terrain vehicles. There are no on-site drainage problems; however, Patterson Park, adjacent and north of the proposed zoning, has experienced drainage problems over the years. The drainage problems that the houses on the eastern end of Troycott Place have experienced over the years have been neutralized by some minor improvements. It is anticipated that if this development has any drainage from impervious areas draining to the north, it will cause the drainage problems to reoccur in Patterson Park. Staff recommends that drainage from any impervious areas not drain to the north. (Proffered Condition 5) Water ualit No Name Creek drains through a portion of the site and is a perennial stream. As such, a 100 foot conservation area will be required on both sides of any associated wetlands inside of which uses are very limited. Any portions of the property that are within the 5 07SN0341 JAN28-BOS-RPT Resource Protection Area (RPA) and are not naturally vegetated are required by ordinance to be re-established with woody vegetation. PUBLIC FACILITIES The need for fire, school, library, park and transportation facilities is identified in the Public Facilities Plan, the Thoroughfare Plan and the Capital Improvement Program. This development will have an impact on these facilities. Fire ~ervice~ The Public Facilities Plan indicates that fire and emergency medical service (EMS) calls are expected to increase forty-four (44) to seventy-eight (78) percent by 2022. Six (6) new fire/rescue stations are recommended for construction by 2022 in the Plan. In addition to the six new stations, the Plan also recommends the expansion of five (5) existing stations. Based on 131 dwelling units, this request will generate approximately sixty-six (66) calls for fire and emergency medical service each year. The applicant has not offered measures to fully address the impact on fire and EMS. (Proffered Condition 2) The Bensley Fire Station, Company #3, currently provides fire protection and emergency medical service. when the property is developed, the number of hydrants, quantity of water needed for fire protection and access requirements will be evaluated during the p ans review process. ~chnnl~~ Approximately sixty-nine (69) (Elementary: 30, Middle: 17, and High: 22) students will be generated by this development. Currently, this site lies in the Bellwood Elementary School attendance zone: capacity - 354, enrollment - 454; Falling Creek Middle School zone: capacity - 1,054, enrollment - 1,051; and Meadowbrook High School zone: capacity -1,541, enrollment -1,935. The enrollment is based on September 30, 2008 and the capacity is as of 2008-2009. This request will have an impact at the elementary, middle and high school level. There are currently nine (9) trailers at Bellwood Elementary; sixteen (16) at Falling Creek Middle and four (4) at Meadowbrook High Schools. This case combined with other residential developments and zoning cases in the area, will continue to push these schools over capacity, necessitating some form of relief in the future. The applicant has not fully offered measures to address the impact of this development on schools facilities. (Proffered Condition 2) 6 07SN0341 JAN28-BOS-RPT T,ihraries: Consistent with the Board of Supervisors' policy, the impact of development on library services is assessed County-wide. Based on projected population growth, the Public Facilities Plan identifies a need for additional library space throughout the County. This development would most likely affect the Chester Library or the Meadowdale Library. The Plan identifies a need for additional library space in the Chester area. The applicant has not offered measures to fully address the impact of this development on library services. (Proffered Condition 2) Parks and Recreation: The Public Facilities Plan identifies the need for three (3) new regional parks, seven (7) community parks, twenty-nine (29) neighborhood parks and five (5) community centers by 2020. In addition, the Public Facilities Plan identifies the need for ten (10) new or expanded special purpose parks to provide water access or preserve and interpret unique recreational, cultural or environmental resources. The Plan identifies shortfalls in trails and recreational historic sites. The applicant has not offered measures to assist in fully addressing the impact of this proposed development on these parks and recreational facilities. (Proffered Condition 2) Transportation: The property (16.9 acres) is currently zoned Light Industrial (I- 1, 15.9 acres) and Residential (R-7, 1 acre). The applicant is requesting rezoning to Residential Townhouse (R-TH). The applicant has proffered that the maximum density will not exceed 131 lots (Proffered Condition 3). Based on townhouse trip rates, development could generate approximately 800 average daily trips (ADT). These vehicles will be distributed, via Gayland Avenue, to Jefferson Davis Highway (Route 1) which had a 2006 traffic count of 24,133 vehicles per day. The capacity of Route 1 is acceptable (Level-of Service B) for the volume of traffic it currently carries. No roadways adjacent to, or within, the development are on the Thoroughfare Plan. The Transportation Department cannot support this request because the applicant has not addressed the traffic impact of the development per the Board of Supervisors' Cash Proffer Policy. The Zoning Ordinance allows streets within townhouse developments to be privately maintained. Staff recommends that all of the main streets within this project be accepted into the State Highway System. Having these streets accepted into the State Highway System will ensure their long-term maintenance. The applicant has proffered that all streets which accommodate general traffic circulation will be designed and constructed to State (i.e., the Virginia Department of Transportation) standards and taken into the State system. (Proffered Condition 10) 7 07SN0341 JAN28-BOS-RPT Gayland Avenue is a State maintained roadway for approximately 500 feet east of the Route 1 intersection. Gayland Avenue right-of way continues through the area to be rezoned. If the property is approved for townhomes without state-maintained roadways, prior to site plan approval, the applicant will need to submit aright-of way vacation package to the county for Staff review and Board of Supervisors' approval. To address Fire Department requirements for a secondary access and address general traffic circulation, the applicant has proffered to improve streets through the existing Bellwood Apartments to the south. Previously, fifty foot (50) foot rights-of way had been dedicated to the county through the Bellwood Terrace apartments; however, the streets are privately maintained by the Bellwood Terrace apartment property owner(s). Prior to any traffic generated by this development accessing through the south, Noel Street (from Jefferson Davis Highway to Maris Road) and Maris Road will be improved to VDOT standards and taken into the State System. (Proffered Condition 7) Area roads need to be improved to address safety and accommodate the increase in traffic generated by this proposed residential development. The applicant has proffered to contribute some money towards mitigating the traffic impact of the proposed residential development (Proffered Condition 2); however, it is not consistent with the Board of Supervisors' Policy. As development continues in this part of the county, traffic volumes on area roads will substantially increase. Cash proffers alone will not cover the cost of the improvements needed to accommodate the traffic increases. No public road improvements in this part of the county are currently included in the Six-Year Improvement Plan. VDOT's "Chapter 527" regulations, dealing with development Traffic Impact Study requirements, have recently been enacted. Staff has been meeting with VDOT to attempt to understand the process and the impact of the regulations. At this time, it is uncertain what impact VDOT's regulations will have on the development process or upon zonings approved by the county. As stated earlier, without the applicant addressing the traffic impact of the residential development per the Board of Supervisors' Cash Proffer Policy, the Transportation Department cannot support this request. 8 07SN0341 JAN28-BOS-RPT Financial Impact on Capital Facilities: PER DWELLING UNIT Potential Number of New Dwelling Units 131 ~ 1.00 Population Increase 3 52.3 9 2.69 Number of New Students Elementary 28.82 0.22 Middle 14.41 0.11 High 20.96 0.16 TOTAL 64.19 0.49 Net Cost for Schools $1,067,388 $8,148 Net Cost for Parks 148,030 1,130 Net Cost for Libraries 33,274 254 Net Cost for Fire Stations 72,836 556 Average Net Cost for Roads 1,817,101 13,871 TOTAL NET COST $3,138,629 $23,959 ~ Based on a proffered maximum of 131 lots (Proffered Condition 3). The actual number of lots and corresponding impact may vary. As noted, this proposed development would have an impact on capital facilities. At the time that this rezoning application was submitted, the calculated fiscal impact of every new dwelling unit on schools, roads, parks, libraries, and fire stations was $15,648 per unit. Effective July 1, 2008 the maximum per-dwelling-unit cash proffer was increased to $18,080. The applicant has been advised that a maximum cash proffer of $18,080 per unit would defray the cost of the capital facilities necessitated by this proposed development. The applicant has offered $15,600 per dwelling unit to address the impact of the development on capital facilities. The proffered conditions do not adequately address the proposed development's impact on capital facilities. Consequently, the county's ability to provide adequate facilities to its citizens will be adversely impacted. (Proffered Condition 2) Note that circumstances relevant to this case, as presented by the applicant, have been reviewed and it has been determined that it is appropriate to accept the maximum cash proffer in this case. The Board of Supervisors', through their consideration of this request, may determine that there are unique circumstances relative to this request that may justify acceptance of proffers as offered for this case. 9 07SN0341 JAN28-BOS-RPT Police: The applicant is proposing to build a high density residential project. With the support of the County Administration, the Police Department seeks to have developers of new high density residential projects implement its recommendations for Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (OPTED) which are planning and designing principles that constitute proactive crime prevention tools. Through OPTED principles, proper design and effective use of the environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime. In addition, the Police Department recommends that high density residential projects either enter into a contract for the permanent presence of a police officer on the premises or annually submit a security plan to it for review and approval. The applicant has addressed the police department's security concerns in its submissions; accordingly, the Police Department supports the applicant's request. (Proffered Condition 9) T , ANTI T TCF, Comprehensive Plan: Lies within the boundaries of the Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan which suggests the property is appropriate for residential use of 2.5 - 4 units per acre. The Plan also suggests that as part of a "Flexible Redevelopment Area", this property may be appropriate for high density residential uses provided it is of a sufficient size to accommodate this more intense development and has adequate access to major arterial or collector roads. Area Development Trends: Properties to the north and west are zoned Residential (R-7) and are occupied by single family dwellings within Patterson Park Subdivision or on acreage property, or are currently vacant. Properties to the south and east are zoned Light Industrial (I-1) and are occupied by Bellwood Terrace Apartments or remain vacant. Site Design: Development must conform to the requirements of the Ordinance for Residential Townhouse (R-TH) Districts. Density: A maximum of 131 lots have been proffered, yielding an overall density of 1.2 dwelling units per acre. (Proffered Condition 3) 10 07SN0341 JAN28-BOS-RPT Building Materials: Proffered Condition 6 addresses foundation treatment for dwellings. Buffers and Fencing: The Zoning Ordinance requires the provision of fifty (50) foot buffers along the northern and western property boundaries adjacent to residentially-zoned properties. The Ordinance does not allow these required buffers to be modified through plans review. The applicant has proffered to incorporate fencing within the northern buffer. (Proffered Condition 8) CONCLUSIONS The proposed zoning and land uses conform to the Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan which suggests the property is appropriate for residential use of 2.5 - 4 units per acre, with higher residential densities permitted under certain circumstances. The proffered conditions do not adequately address the impacts of this development on necessary capital facilities, as outlined in the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the needs for roads, schools, parks, libraries and fire stations is identified in the Public Facilities Plan, the Thoroughfare Plan and the Capital Improvement Program, and the impact of this development is discussed herein. The proffered conditions do not mitigate the impact on capital facilities, thereby insuring adequate service levels are maintained and protecting the health, safety and welfare of County citizens. Given these considerations, approval subject to the applicant fully addressing the impact of this request on capital facilities is recommended. CASE HISTORY Planning Commission Meeting (9/18/07): At the request of the applicant, the Commission deferred this case to their November 20, 2007, meeting. Staff (9/19/07): The applicant was advised in writing that any significant, new or revised information should be submitted no later than September 24, 2007 for consideration at the Commission's November 20, 2007 hearing. In addition, the applicant was advised that a $250.00 deferral fee must be paid prior to the Commission's public hearing. 11 07SN0341 JAN28-BOS-RPT Applicant (10/3/07): The deferral fee was paid. Staff (10/26/07): To date, no new information has been submitted. Applicant (11/5/07): Anew proffered condition was submitted. Planning Commission Meeting (11/20/07): On their own motion, the Commission deferred this case to their December 18, 2007, meeting. Staff (11 /21 /07) The applicant was advised in writing that any significant, new or revised information should be submitted no later than November 26, 2007 for consideration at the Commission's December 18, 2007 meeting. Staff (11 /27/07) To date, no new information has been submitted. Planning Commission Meeting (12/18/07): On their own motion, the Commission deferred this case to their January 15, 2008 public Baring. Staff (12/19/07): The applicant was advised in writing that any new or revised information should be submitted no later than December 26, 2007 for consideration at the Commission's January public hearing. 12 07SN0341 JAN28-BOS-RPT Staff (12/27/07): To date, no new information has been received. Planning Commission Meeting (1/15/08): At the request of the applicant, the Commission deferred this case to their February 19, 2008 meeting. Staff (1/16/08): The applicant was advised in writing that any significant, new or revised information should be submitted no later than January 21, 2008 for consideration at the Commission's February 19, 2008 hearing. In addition, the applicant was advised that a $500.00 deferral fee must be paid prior to the Commission's public hearing. Staff (1 /22/08) To date, no new information has been submitted nor has the deferral fee been paid. Applicant (2/18/08): The deferral fee was paid. Planning Commission Meeting (2/19/08): On their own motion, the Commission deferred this case to their March 18, 2008 public Baring. Staff (2/21/08): The applicant was advised in writing that any significant, new or revised information should be submitted no later than February 25, 2008 for consideration at the Commission's March public hearing. 13 07SN0341 JAN28-BOS-RPT Staff (2/26/08): To date, no new information has been submitted. Planning Commission Meeting (3/18/08): The applicant accepted the recommendation. There was no opposition present. On motion of Mr. Hassen, seconded by Mr. Bass, the Commission recommended approval and acceptance of the proffered conditions on pages 2 and 3. AYES: Messrs. Gulley, Bass, Brown, Hassen and Waller. Board of Supervisors' Meeting (4/23/08): On their own motion, the Board deferred this case to their June 25, 2008 public hearing. Staff (4/24/08): The applicant was advised in writing that any significant, new or revised information should be submitted no later than April 28, 2008 for consideration at the Board's June 25, 2008 hearing. Staff (5/23/08): To date, no new information has been submitted. Board of Supervisors' Meeting (6/25/08): At the request of the applicant, the Board deferred this case to their September 24, 2008 meeting. Staff (6/27/08): The applicant was advised in writing that any significant, new or revised information should be submitted no later than July 9, 2008 for consideration at the Board's September 24, 2008 meeting. The applicant was also advised that a $250.00 deferral fee must be pai . 14 07SN0341 JAN28-BOS-RPT Staff (8/21/08): To date, no new information has been submitted nor has the deferral fee been paid. Board of Supervisors' Meeting (9/24/08): On their own motion, the Board deferred this case to their January 28, 2009 public Baring. Staff (9/26/08): The applicant was advised in writing that any significant new or revised information should be submitted no later that November 10, 2008 for consideration at the Board's January public hearing. Staff (12/19/08): To date, no new information has been submitted. The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday, January 28, 2009, beginning at 6:30 p.m., will take under consideration this request. 15 07SN0341 JAN28-BOS-RPT ~ M ~ Q N i ~ M ~' M ~ ~~ ~~~'~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~. I ~ .^ ~ ` ,. • ~ 1 .• ~ 7 . ~ .g5 ~ • NI .-' .^ '~~ N M _ S~~`'~i ~\ ____ ~_ eo~~~e~xso N .~__~ --, .-j .~- ^~--_ °~ ~ ~ :::.:::::::~~ ::::::...: I ~ o r .... ~:.. ...... ~ Q i i Q r ....: .. ..:...::: ~ 0 R~ ':::'....::: :::::::J: ~ 0 ~ ~ ~R Y ::::::"... T:,.~:..... 0 ~ ~ ~ ';;::::'.....: :::::::: J 0 m ~ ... NoE~ U ^ ~ ~ ~ _ ~- 1 ~ ~~ .~ 1 ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ ~. `S ~~ ~ N ~ ~ w S ~ ~- ~ ~'? ~ ~ .-~ ~ 1. ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~~~ t ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ' i 1 , U I ' 1 U ^ U ' N 1 ~ ~R ~ ~ ~~ ~ 1 ~ o ~ 1 1 1 o S ' m J ' r ~ p ~ ~ ~ . ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~~U ~ M l ~ N o i~ Z ~ o r ~ ~ ~ , N U ~` ~ .. ~ /