01-25-1984 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
January 25, 1984
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr. Harry Go Daniel, Chairman
Mr. G. H. Applegate, Vice Chairman
Mr. R. Garland Dodd
Mrs. Joan Girone
Mr. Jesse J. Mayes
Mr. Richard L. Hedrick
County Administrator
Staff in Attendance:
Mr. Stanley Balderson,
Dir. of Planning
Mr. William Diggs, Real
Estate Assessor
Chief Robert Eanes, Fire
Department
Mr. Robert Galusha,
Personnel Director
Mr. Phil Hester, Dir. of
Parks and Recreation
Mr. Robert Hodder,
Building Inspector
Mr. Elmer Hodge, Asst.
County Administrator
Mr. William Howell, Dir.
of General Services
Dr. Burt Lowe, Dir. of
Mental Health/Mental
Retardation
Mr. Robert Masden~ Dir.
of Human Services
Mr. Richard McElfish,
Environmental Engineer
Mr. Steve Micas, County
Attorney
Mrs. Pauline Mitchell,
Public Info. O[ficer
Mr. Jeffrey Muzzy, Dir.
of Community Develop.
Mr. Lane Ramsey, Dir. of
Budget and Accounting
Mr. David Reeve, Dir. of
Juvenile Detention Hom~
Mr. David Welchons~ Dir.
of Utilities
Mr. Daniel called the meeting to order at the Courthouse at 9-00
a.m. (EST).
1. I NVOCAT I ON
Mr. Daniel introduced Dr. Melvin W. Parker, Pastor of Salem
Baptist Church, who gave the invocation.
2. APPROVAL OF TIlE MINUTES
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
approved the minutes of January 11 and i3, 1984, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
3. COUNTY ADMINI~ ~R..~ OR ' S C. OMMENTS
Mr Hedrick welcom,~d Nfs Pau]a
..... ~.luires who had returned to cover
the County on a regular baszs t.'or the l~ichmond
· m~.~ Dispatch and
introduced Ms. Lindsey Reese w$ th WPVA Radio in Petersburg.
4. ITEMS TO BE DELETED OR HEARD OUT OF SEQUENCE
Dodd stated he and members of staff were scheduled to meet
[th the Richmond HUD office at 4:00 p.m. this afternoon and
requested that the Bermuda District zoning cases be heard out of
sequence in order that he might attend that meeting. It was
generally agreed to honor this request.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
authorized staff to advertise simultaneously a rezoning case for
Mr. Tommy Haynes for the Planning Commission and for the Board of
Supervisors as it is an emergency situation.
Vote: Unanimous
5. RESOLUTIONS OF SPECIAL RECOGNITION
5.A. RECOGNIZING MR. WILLIAM C. LINDSEY, JR.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Mr. William C. Lindsey, Jr. was appointed to the
Chesterfield County Planning Commission as the representative
from Clover Hill District on January 6, 1982; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Lindsey did faithfully perform the duties and
discharge the responsibilities incumbent upon a member of tke
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Lindsey's term on the Planning Commission has
ended effective December 31~ 1983; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Lindsey's two years of service to the citizens
of Chesterfield County deserves special recognition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County hereby expresses its appreciation to Mr.
William C. Lindsey, Jr. for his loyal and dedicated service to
the citizens of Chesterfield County;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a plaque inscribed as
follows be presented to Mr. William C. Lindsey, Jr.:
WILLIAM C. LI~DSEY, JR.
IN APPRECIATION FOR DEDICATED SERVICE
ON THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 6, ].982 - DECEMBER 31, 1983
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Daniel presented Mr. L~ndsey with 'the resolution and plaque.
Mr. Lindsey stated it had been his honor and pleasure to serve on
the Planning Commission and he would cherish the plaque and
resolution.
5.B. RECOGNIZING DR~ MAX MOSZER
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Dr. Max Moszer was appointed to the Chesterfield
County Planning Commission as the representative from Midlothian
District on July 1, 1981; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Moszer did faithfully perform the duties and
discharge the responsibilities incumbent upon a member of the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Moszer's term on the Planning Commission has
ended effective December 3±~ 1983; an~
WHEREAS, Dr. Moszer's %~o and one-half yesrs of service to
the citizens of Chesterfield County deserves special reco~nit]~o~
84-37
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County hereby expresses its appreciation to Dr.
Max Moszer for his loyal and dedicated service to the citizens of
Chesterfield County;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a plaque inscribed as
follows be presented to Dr. Max Moszer:
DR. MAX MOSZER
IN APPRECIATION FOR DEDICATED SERVICE
ON THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 1, 1981 - DECEMBER 31, 1983
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Daniel presented Dr. Moszer with the plaque and resolution.
Dr. Moszer stated it had been his pleasure to serve on the
Planning Commission and stated it is obvious that representative
government is alive and strong in the County.
5.C. 1983 UNITED WAY CAMPAIGN AWARDS
Mr. Hedrick introduced Ms. Suzan Craik, United Way Campaign
Chairman for the County. She stated the County had raised
$13,575.00 which is the highest amount ever. She stated four
departments had put forth an extra effort. Mr. Daniel
congratulated and presented plaques to the following solicitors
for their Departments:
Roy Patrick
Fire Department
Nancy Phaup and
Gertrude Green
Nursing Home
- Most Dollars Raised from
Individual Department
- Increase in Participation over
the Last Several Years
Frances Cole
Assessor's Office
Kendall Harvey
Juvenile Detention Home
- Increase in Participation and
100% Participation
- Increase in Contributions
Mr. Daniel thanked staff for their contributions by helping
others with their generosity.
5.D. EMPLOYEE OF THE YEAR, 1983
Mr. Galusha stated that when Mr. Melvin Burnett retired as County
Administrator he established a fund for the purpose of ~
recognizing outstanding performance of service by County
employees. He explained the established criteria and the method
of selection of the Employee of the Year. He introduced Mr. ~red
S. Balarzs, Department of General Services; Captain David C~
Creasy, Fire Department; M.r~ Donald L. Ford, Building Inspections
Department; Ms. Christine Haas, Mental Health/Mental Retardation
Services Department; Ms. Sally K. Hite, Planning Department: Mr.
Harry Livesay, Data Processing Department; Mrs. Diane K.
Lockleay, Nursing Home; Ms. Susie Owens, Parks and Recreation
Department; Mr. William O. Wright, Utilities Department; Mrs.
Elizabeth P. Wilkinson, Treasurer's Office; Ms. Joycealyn M.
Armstrong, Social Services; and Mrs. Janet Tiernan, Library
Services Department, who were nominated for the
Employee-of-the-Year. Mr. Redrick congrstulated all those
nominated and announced that ~r. F~i~d S. Balarzs, General
Services Department, had been selected as the Chesterfield County
Employee-of-the-Year. He presented Mr. Ba!arzs with a framed
resolution, a silver ~nqraved Revere bowl, a $50 savings bond and
the reserved parking space at the entrance of the Administration
Building.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
84.-38
WHEREAS, Mr. Fred S. Balarzs, Superintendent of Buildings
and Grounds, Department of General Services, has distinguished
himself by consistently demonstrating an exceptional degree of
-loyal and dedicated service to Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, This loyalty and dedication by service has been
such as to warrant special recognition by his fellow employees;
and
WHEREAS, His singular contribution of talents and expertise
to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of his department has
been of such significance as to have brought distinct credit not
only upon himself but his department and the County Government as
well; and
WHEREAS, By his selection as the recipient of the
Chesterfield County Employee-of-the-Year Award, he has been
recognized by his peers to be the employees' employee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors
hereby recognizes this loyal and dedicated service by fellow
employee, Fred S. Balarzs, by naming him the Chesterfield County
Employee-of-the-Year for 1983.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Balarzs expressed his appreciation for this recognition.
6. HEARINGS OF CITIZENS ON UNSCHEDULED MATTERS AND CLAIMS
Mr. Hedrick noted there were no claims or matters to be heard at
this time.
7. DEFERRED ITEMS
7.A. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION COST APPROVALS
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approved
the installation of a street light at the intersection of
Rosewood Lane and Woodpecker Road with the necessary funds to be
expended from the Matoaca District Street Light Funds and further
the Board deferred indefinitely for further study, installation
of a street light at the intersection of Andrews Drive and
Rosewood Lane, both of which are in Shadowbrook Heights
Subdivision.
Vote: Unanimous
7.B. REQUEST TO AID ROPER DEVELOPMENT IN ACQUIRING EASEMENT
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved
the request of Roper Development and authorized the Right of Way
Department to assist in acquiring a sewer easement across the
property of Mary Steele Booton to serve Mistwood Forest
Subdivision subject to Roper Development executing a contract
with the County, agreeing to pay all costs involved. It is noted
that if the negotiations fail, the staff will request Board
approval of condemnation proceedings.
Vote: Unanimous
7.C. APPOINTMENT TO MUSEUM COMMITTEE
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
appointed Mr. Jesse J. Mayes to tile Museum Committee as the
Board's representative whose term is effective immediately and
is at the pleasure of the Board.
84-39
Vote: Unanimous
7.D. PUBLIC HEARING RELATING TO WATER AND SEWER CONNECTION FEES
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board set
the date of February 22, 1984 at 9:00 a.m. for a public hearing
to consider an ordinance to amend the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, by amending Sections 20-7, 20-10
20-24.1 and 20-27 relating to connections and connection fees to
the sewer and water system.
Vote: Unanimous
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Mr. Hedrick stated there were no public hearings scheduled for
this meeting.
9. NEW BUSINESS
9.A. TELEPHONE RATE INCREASE
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
Whereas, the rates charged to local governments by C & P
Telephone Company of Virginia are not subject to the jurisdictiol
of the State Corporation Commission; and
Whereas, the Virginia Municipal League/Virginia Association
of Counties Steering Committee has been formed to negotiate fair
and equitable telephone rates on behalf of local governments; an(
Whereas, C & P Telephone Company of Virginia has declined
the Steering Committee's invitations to enter into good faith
negotiations of telephone rates for local governments; and
Whereas, a request by C & P Telephone Company of Virginia t~
increase its Virginia jurisdictional rates effective January 1,
1984 has been approved by the State Corporation Commission.
Be It Resolved that:
The Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County is opposed
to any proposal for the telephone companies and other public
utilities to amend the Virginia Code provisions which exemp~
local governments from the schedule of rates established by
the Virginia State Corporation Commission for service
rendered to persons, firms and corporations, and it
authorizes appropriate officials of this jurisdiction to
express this opposition to members of the Virginia General
Assembly.
The Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County authorizes
the Virginia Municipal League/Virginia Association of
Counties Steering Committee to negotiate fair and equitable
telephone rates on behalf of this County.
Until a contract is negotiated providing for fair and
equitable rates for telephone service rendered by C & P
Telephone CoInpany to this jurisdiction, the appropriate
officials of this jurisdiction are authorized to continue
payment of those rates that we~-e in effect on December
1983.
And further the Board:
84-40
Authorized the holding back of the increase in local service
rates approved by the SCC and depositing of those funds in
an escrow account pending resolution of this matter.
Appropriated from the General Fund Contingency and
authorized payment of $7,069 to VML/VACO representing the
County's pro-rata share of litigation and negotiation costs.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Micas indicated that during the negotiation process, the
County will pay the rates that were in effect prior to January 1,
1984 and escrow the difference.
9.B. SET PUBLIC HEARING RELATING TO LAND USE ASSESSMENT
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
set the date of February 22, 1984 at 9:00 a.m. for a public
hearing to consider an ordinance to amend Chapter 8, Article IV,
Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, by adding
Section 8-19.1 relating to annual revalidation of special land
use assessment applications.
Vote: Unanimous
9.C. APPOINTMENTS
9.C.1. CHESTERFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE TO RRPDC
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
accepted Mr. Lawrence Belcher's name for nomination as the
Chesterfield County Planning Commission's representative to the
Richmond Regional Planninq District Commission which will be
considered at the February 8, 1.984 meeting.
Vote: Unanimous
9.C.2. NORTHERN AREA LANDFILL COMMITTEE
Mr. Hedrick stated the Northern Area Landfill Committee was
initially appointed for assistance in locating the site and
developing the landfill. He stated that the committee was an ad
hoc committee and everything seems to be functioning very well
with the landfill and unless the Board wants to maintain that
liaison, staff feels the committee is unnecessary. Mr. Hodge
stated if the Board decides to continue with the committee, it be
a County-wide committee to address the northern and southern area
landfills. Mr. Applegate stated he understood the northern area
landfill was a touchy issue and the citizens group wanted to
maintain visual control of the ot~eration and if the County can
give the citizens assurance that the County will monitor it
closely, he could approve the recommendation. Mr. Mayes voiced
his support for the continuation of the committee as he felt it
would be of service to the Board. After further discussion, it
was on motion of Mr Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, resolved
that Mr. Applegate and Mr. Mayes study this matter further and
bring a recommendation back to the Board on February 8, 1984.
Vote: Unanimous
9.D. CONSENT ITEMS
9.D.1. PARK BOND FUND ADJUSTMENTS AND PROJECT CLOSEOUTS
Mr. Mayes expressed his ccncern about the park bond fund
adjustments and project closeouts to be transferred from Matoaca
District and stated he would prefe~ this matter be deferred until
84-41
he could review this with staff as well as personally look into
ithe needs of the district.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
deferred consideration of this matter until February 8, 1984.
Vote: Unanimous
9.D.2. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH MOOREFIELD ASSOCIATES
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to execute the Maintenance
Agreement for the stormwater management system with the developer
of Moorefield, as approved by the County Attorney.
Vote: Unanimous
9.E. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS
9oE.1. ACCESS TO DALE WOODS SUBDIVISION
Mr. Balderson explained the resolution of this road question is a
culmination of efforts of the Planning and the Parks and
Recreation Departments working with an area developer to secure
for the County, extension of the Dale Park access road as well as
providing additional public street access for subdivision in the
area. On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board:
Directed staff to negotiate shared responsibility between
the Dale Woods owner and the County. Developer solely
responsible for constructing Road "B". Parcel "A" sold to
Dale Woods owner for $16,000. In return the County will use
these funds to extend Dale Park Road for connection with
Route "B". This would provide a 320 ft. extension of the
Dale Park Road; would reduce the second phase construction
cost of Dale Park Road extension to Kingsland Road; and give
another access to Huntingcreek Hills Subdivision, thereby
improving traffic circulation and emergency access.
e
Set the date of February 22, 1984 at 9:00 a.m. for the sale
of 3.824 acre parcel.
Authorized the County Administrator to enter into a contract
based on the terms stated above.
Vote: Unanimous
It was noted this $16,000 would cover the entire cost for the
extension of the road.
9.E.2. SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR SECONDARY ROAD CONSTRUCTION PLAN
Mr. Hedrick stated because of advertising schedules, the public
hearing for the secendary road construction plan has been
advertised for February 8, 1984. Mr. Mayes stated he would like
the hearing scheduled ~or a later date as there were several
items which he would like to have included in the plan. It was
generally agreed that the Board should be notified when
advertising is placed prior to Board action. Mr. Dodd and Mrs.
Girone also expressed displeasure with the small amount of funds
allocated to the County for road construction. After further
discussion, it was on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes,
resolved that the date of February 8, 1984 at 7:00 p.m. be set
for the public hearing on the Secondary Road Construction Plan
with the understanding that if there ~s still concern, it would
be deferred until February 22, 1984 at 9:00 a.m. and that a work
session would be held at 2:00 p.m. on February 8, 1984.
8~-42
Vote: Unanimous
9.E.3. STREET LIGHT REQUEST
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
approved the installation of a street light at the intersection
of Penmar Drive and River Road with any associated costs to be
expended from the Matoaca District Street Light Funds.
Vote: Unanimous
9.F. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
9.F.1. REPORTS
9.F.l.a. WATER AND SEWER FINANCIAL REPORTS
Mr. Welchons presented and reviewed the water and sewer financia~
reports with the Board.
9.F.l.b. DEVELOPER WATER AND SEWER CONTRACTS
Mr. Welchons presented the Board with a list of developer water
and sewer contracts executed by the County Administrator.
9.F.2. SEWER SERVICE FOR LOGAN COURT SUBDIVISION
Mr. Welchons stated there currently exists septic tank problems
on Logan Street and the Health Department has reviewed the area
and it would be difficult to make repairs and if so, they were
not certain of how long they would last. He stated there are
four houses in the area and staff recommends the line being
extended if three of the four agree to connect. Mrs. Girone
stated two of the four had agreed and there is the possibility of
the other two also connecting. She stated she was also concerned
about the home at 8500 Kenwin and inquired if it could be served
by this line. Mr. Welchons stated he was not certain because of
the topography. It was noted this extension would be consistent
with County policy. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr.
Dodd, the Board authorized the extension of sewer service to fou~
houses in Logan Court Subdivision, a copy of which plat is filed
with the papers of this Board; staff was requested to investigate
the possibility of serving 8500 Kenwin with this line and further
the Board appropriated $15,000 from 574 surplus to
380-1-74181-4393. If it is determined that 8500 Kenwin can be
served and a modification is necessary, it will be brought back
to the Board.
Vote: Unanimous
9.F.3. CONSENT ITEMS
9.F.3.a. WATER CONTRACT FOR LAKE FARMS
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved the request for an extension of time on refund for an
oversize water line from Commonwealth Development Corporation,
Contract W78-118CD/6(7)8185, Lake Farms from October 25, 1983
until October 31, 1984.
Vote: Unanimous
9.Fo3.b. WATER CONTRACT - WEST HUNDRED ROAD AND BRANDERS BRIDGE
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
84-43
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute any
necessary documents for R. R. Snipes Construction Company, Inc.
in the amount of $79,915.00 for W83-37C/6(8)3371 for construction
of water lines along West Hundred Road and Branders Bridge Road
based on Alternate "C" and further the Board appropriated
$12,906.00 from 563 surplus to 380-1-63371-4393. It is noted
there had been a previous appropriation of $75,000.
Vote: Unanimous
9.F.3.c. DEED OF DEDICATION FROM VIRGINIA DENTAL PROPERTIES
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator, to accept on
behalf of the County, a deed of dedication from Virginia Dental
Properties for a 10 ft. wide strip of land along Jefferson Davis
Highway and Osborne Road, Map Section 48-14, a copy of the plat
is filed with the papers of this Board.
Vote: Unanimous
G. REPORTS
Mr. Hedrick presented the Board with reports on the status of
Dale Park Funding, Courthouse Road Extended and Land Values at
the Chesterfield County Airport Industrial Park.
Mr. Hedrick stated the Highway Department had notified the County
that the roads in the following subdivisions had been officially
accepted into the State Secondary System, effective as indicated:
Length
Roxshire, Sections 6 and 7 (1-5-84)
Thornleigh Road - Beginning at intersection with
Planters Row Drive, State Route 3137, and going
0.07 mile northwesterly to intersection with
Corner Rock Road.
0.07 mi.
Corner Rock Road - Beginning where State maintenance
ends, Corner Rock Road, State Route 728, and going
0.30 mile southerly to intersection with Thornleigh
Road, then continues 0.].3 mile southerly to a temporary
turnaround.
0.43 mi.
Belmont Hills, West, Section B (1-5-84)
Egan Road - Beginning at its intersection with
Egan Road, State Route 2759, and Manning Road, State
Route 2223, extending southerly 0.06 mile to the
intersection of West Road.
0.06 mi.
West Road - Beginning at its intersection with
Egan Road, extending northwest 0.29 mile to
the intersection of Newbys Bridge Road, State Route
651.
0.29 mi.
Solar I, Section 3 (1-5-84)
Fahey Court - Beginning at its intersection with
Scottingham Drive, extending northeast 0.06 mile to a
cul-de-sac.
0.06 mi.
Fahey Circle - Beginning at its intersection with
Scottingham Drivel extending northeast 0.07 mile to
a cul-de-sac.
0.07 mi.
84-.44
Scottingham Drive - Beginning at its intersection
with Providence Road, State Route 678, extending
westerly 0.12 mile to the intersection of Fahey Court,
then west 0.06 mile to the intersection of Fahey Circle,
then northwest 0.05 mile to the intersection of Partridge
Lane. 0.23 mi
Partridge Lane - Beginning at its intersection with
Scottingham Drive, extending southwest 0.07 mile to the
intersection of Hann Road.
Hann Road - Beginning at its intersection with
Partridge Lane, extending southeast 0.06 mile to a
temporary turnaround and extending northwest 0.09 mile
to a cul-de-sac.
~msgate, Sections 1, 2 and 3 (1-9-84)
0.07 mi.
0.15 mi.
Fawnview Drive - Beginning at intersection with Pegwell
Drive and going 0.22 mile southeasterly to intersection
with Fincastle Court.
Copperfield Place - Beginning at intersection with
Woodmont Drive and going 0.10 mile easterly to a cul-
de-sac.
Woodmont Drive - BeginI~ing at intersection with
Ramshorn Road and going 0.07 mile southwesterly to
intersection with Copperfield Place, then road turns and
continues 0.16 mile southeasterly to intersection with
Burlwood Court, then continues 0.05 mile southeasterly
to intersection with West Huguenot Road, State Route
147.
Burlwood Court - Beginning at intersection with
Woodmont Drive and going 0.06 mile northerly to a
cul-de-sac.
Fincastle Court - Beginning at intersection with
Ramshorn Road and going 0.12 mile southwesterly to
intersection with Fawnview Drive, then continues
0.08 mile southwesterly to a cul-de-sac.
Pegwell Drive - Beginning at intersection with Ramshorn
Road and going 0.09 m~le westerly to intersection with
Fawnview Drive, then continues 0.22 mile westerly to
a temporary turnaround.
Ramshorn Road - Beginning at its intersection with Rams
View and going 0.04 mile east; again, beginning at its
intersection with Rams View and going 0.55 mile
northwest.
Rams View - Beginning in the City of Richmond and
goin9 southwesterly .02 mile to intersection with
Ramshorn Road.
Kin~sland Meadows, Section B (1-11-84)
0.22 mi.
0.10 mi.
0.28 mi.
0.06 mi.
0.20 mi.
0.31 mi.
0.59 mi.
0.02 mi.
Bluespruce Drive - Beginning at the intersection with
Kingsland Road~ State Route 611, and running southerly
0.10 mile to end in a cul-de-sac.
Terjo Village (1-12-84)
0.10 mi.
Terjo Lane - Beginning at the J~ntersection with Old
Centralia Road, Route 609, and running westerly 0.20
mile to cul-de-sac.
J. WORK SESSIONS
0.20 mi.
Mr. Hedrick presented the Board with a list of items for which
the Board should set dates for work ~;ess±ons.
84-4~
It was generally agreed the Board would recess for 10 minutes.
Reconvening:
It was generally agreed that the Board would meet on February 8th
at 2:00 p.m. for a work session on secondary roads followed by a
work session on the sewer master plan and on February 9th at 3:00
p.m. for a work session on the Capital Improvements Program and
dinner with the Airport Advisory Board at 6:30 p.m. It was also
agreed that the budget work sessions would be held at a later
date.
K. EXECUTIVE SESSION
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board went
into Executive Session to discuss the location and use of public
facilities as permitted by Section 2.1-344 (a) (2) of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
Reconvening:
The Board recessed for lunch at the Airport Restaurant.
Reconvening:
Mr. Daniel announced that the Board would be hearing the mobile
homes and zoning requests for Bermuda District first as Mr. Dodd
had to leave the meeting early to attend another meeting for the
County.
Mr. Daniel reviewed the procedures for the cases to be heard and
the format to be followed.
Mr. Daniel stated in the future, the Board members will rotate as
presiding officers for the zoning cases beginning with the Vice
Chairman at the February 22, 1984 meeting and then from the
senior Board member to the junior Board member.
I. REQUESTS FOR REZONING - DEFERRALS OR WITHDRAWALS
83S085 (Amended)
In Matoaca Magisterial District, RICHARD L. JORDAN requested a
Conditional Use to permit a veterinary hospital in an
Agricultural (A) District on a 1.05 acre parcel fronting
approximately 190 feet on the northeast line of Woodpecker Road
and located approximately 440 feet southeast of its intersection
with Bixby Lane. Tax Map 161-11 (1) Part of Parcel 1 (Sheet 48).
Mr. Balderson stated the applicant had withdrawn this request.
There was no one present to discuss the matter. On motion of Mr.
Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board accepted the applicant's
request for withdrawal.
Vote: Unanimous
83Sl12
In Bermuda Magisterial District, FIRST PIONEER REALTY, INC. re-
quested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12) of a
25.4 acre parcel fronting approximately 1,300 feet on Old
Centralia Road and approximately 400 feet on Centralia Road, and
located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of these
roads. Tax Map 97-'7 (1) Parcel 3 (Sheet 32).
Mr. Balderson stated the applicant had withdrawn this request.
There was no one present to discuss this matter. On motion of
8~-46
Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board accepted the
applicant's request for withdrawal.
Vote: Unanimous
84S006
In Bermuda Magisterial District, L.R. GOYNE ESTATE requested an
amendment to a previously granted Conditional Use Planned
Development (Case 80S129) to: (1) revise the Master Plan; (2)
delete Condition 12, requiring improvements along Osborne Road;
and (3) delete a portion of Condition 20, relative to site
grading plans on a 36.4 acre parcel fronting approximately 900
feet on the south line of Osborne Road and located approximately
800 feet west of Jefferson Davis Highway. Tax Map 98-13 (1)
Parcel 9 and Part of Parcel 8 (Sheet 32).
Mr. Balderson stated the applicant had withdrawn this request.
There was no one present to discuss the matter. On motion of Mr.
Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board accepted the applicant's
request for withdrawal.
Vote: Unanimous
83S136
In Clover Hill Maqisterial District, ARCHITECTONICS, INC.
requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-9) of
a 7.08 acre parcel fronting approximately 310 feet on the west
line of Turner Road approximately 1,100 feet north of Elkhardt
Road. Tax Map 29-5 (1) Parcels 4 and 5 (Sheet 9).
Mr. Balderson stated this case was scheduled to be heard today
but this is the case involving the Turner Road study which is
underway at this time and should be completed by the March 28,
1984 meeting. Mr. Tom Ash was present representing the applicant
and stated that if 60 days were necessary for the report to be
completed, they were supportive of the deferral. On motion of
Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, this request was deferred
until March 28, 1984.
Vote: Unanimous
83S168
In Midlothian Magisterial District, CHARLES L. CHANDLER requested
a Conditional Use Planned Development to permit a motel in a
Community Business (B-2) District on a 3.2 acre parcel fronting
approximately 50 feet on the north line of Midlothian Turnpike
approximately 600 feet southeast of Robious Road. Tax Map 17-12
(1) Parcels 26 and 33 and Part of Parcel 4 (Sheet 8).
Mr. Balderson stated the applicant had requested a 30 day
deferral of this request. There was no one present to discuss
the matter. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate,
the Board deferred consideratiol] of this request until February
22, 1984.
Vote: Unanimous
83S206
In Midlothian Magisterial District, SOL AXEL AND B. R. FREASIER,
JR., ET AL, requested an amendment to a previously granted
Conditional Use (Case 79S173) to modify Condition 4, relative to
buffers, in a Community Business (B-~2) District on an 11.16 acre
parcel fronting appro~mately 800 feet on the north line of
~4-47
Midlothian Turnpike, approximately 1,500 feet west of Grove Road.
Tax Map 16-11 (1) Parcel 10 (Sheet 7).
Mr. Balderson stated the applicant had requested a 30 day
deferral. There was no one present to discuss the matter. On
motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board deferred
consideration of this request until February 22, 1984.
Vote: Unanimous
H. REQUESTS FOR MOBILE HOMES
Mr. Dodd stated that although he is in the mobile home business,
he is not directly involved with sales, and stated if anyone were
purchasing a mobile home from his company to let it be known so
he could disqualify himself from voting to prevent any conflict
of interest.
84SR009
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Leonard P. Wheeler requested
renewal of a Mobii[e Home Permit to park a mobile home on property
which he owns. Tax Map 98-6 (3) Belmeade, Block 10, Lots 5, 6, 7
and 14 and better known as 10610 Seminole Avenue (Sheet 32).
Mrs. Wheeler was present. There was no opposition present. On
motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. App]egate, the Board approved
this request for a period of five years subject to the following
standard conditions:
The applicant shall be the owner and occupant of the mobile
home.
No lot or parcel may be rented or leased for use as a mobile
home site, nor shall any mobile home be used for rental
property. Only one (1) mobile home shall be permitted to be
parked on an individual lot or parcel.
The minimum lot size, yard setbacks, required front yard,
and other zoning requirements of the applicable zoning
district shall be complied with, except that no mobile home
shall be located closer than 20 feet to any existing
residence.
No additional permanent-type living space may be added onto
a mobile home. All mobile homes shall be skirted but shall
not be placed on a permanent foundation.
Where public (County) water and/or sewer are available, they
shall be used.
Upon being granted a Mobile Home Permit, the applicant shall
then obtain the necessary permits from the Office of the
Building Official. This shall be done prior to the
installation or relocation of the mobile home.
Any violation of the above conditions shall be grounds for
revocation of the Mobile Home Permit.
Vote: Unanimous
84SR010
In Matoaca Magisterial District, John T. Harrison requested
renewal of a Mobile Home Permit to park a mobile home on property
which he owns. Tax ~ap 186-3 (]) parcel 56 and better known as
6508 River Road (Sheet 52).
84-48
Mr. Harrison was present. There was no opposition present. On
motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approved
this request for a period of five years subject to the following
standard conditions: ~
The applicant shall be the owner and occupant of the mobile
home.
No lot or parcel may be rented or leased for use as a mobil
home site, nor shall any mobile home be used for rental
property. Only one (1) mobile home shall be permitted to bi
parked on an individual lot or parcel.
The minimum lot size, yard setbacks, required front yard,
an~ other zoning requirements of the applicable zoning
district shall be complied with, except that no mobile home
shall be located closer than 20 feet to any existin~
residence. .
No additiona~ permanent-type living space may be added onto
a ~obi!e home. All mobile homes shall be skirted but shall
no'__~h be placed on a permanent foundation·
Where public (County) water and/or sewer are available, they
shall be used.
Upon being granted a ~1obile Home Permit, the applicant shall
then cbtain the necessary permits from the Office of 'the
Building (~ffl~lal. This shall be done prior to the
installation or relocation of the mobile home.
Any vJoJation of the above conditions shall be grounds for
revocation of the Mobile Home Permit.
Vote: Unanimous
84SR011
In Ber.muda Magisterial District, William Seid requested renewal
of a Mobile Home Pc~_ml~t to park a mobile home on property which
belongs to W.L.C~W. Corporation, of which he is the president.
Tax Map 81-4 (!) parcel 23 and better known as 8809 Jefferson
Davis Highway (Sheet 23).
No one was present representing the application. T, here was no
opposition present. On mot.;.on of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr.
Applegate, the Board approved this request for a period of five
years subject to the fo-~ow.~ng standard conditions:
1. The applicant shall, be the owner and occupant of the mobile
home.
No lob or parcel may be rented or leased for use as a mobJ. le
home site, /]or sh~!l any mobile bom· be used for rental
property. Only one (i) mobile home shall be e,- ' ..
~ P ~mltted to be
parked on an individu¢l lot. or parcel.
The minimum lot size, yar~ se_bac~(s, required front yard,
and other zoning requirements of the applicable zoning
district sba/.]_ be c:o~p]ied with, except that no mob~.le home
shall be located close~? than 20 feet to any existinq
residence. _
No additJ, ona] permanent-hype living space may be added onto
a mobi;te home. All mobi.1..e homes shall be skirted but sha].l
no'__~t be placed or, a permanent foundation·
Where p~]blic (County) water and/or sewe~ are avail, able, they
shall be used, '-
84-.49
Upon being granted a Mobile Home Permit, the applicant shall
then obtain the necessary permits from the Office of the
Building Official. This shall be done prior to the
installation or relocation of the mobile home.
Any violation of the above conditions shall be grounds for
revocation of the Mobile Home Permit.
Vote: Unanimous
84S012
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Dolores H. Drinkard requested a
Mobile Home Permit to park a mobile home on property which she
owns. Tax Map 67-10 (3) Rayon Park, Block 7, Lots 11 through 14
and better known as 7600 Senate Street (Sheet 23).
Mrs. Drinkard was present and stated the property was located
across the railroad tracks next to the Defense General Supply
Center. There was no opposition present. On motion of of Mr.
Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved this request for
a period of five years subject to the following standard
conditions:
The applicant shall be the owner and occupant of the mobile
home.
No lot or parcel may be rented or leased for use as a mobile
home site, nor shall any mobile home be used for rental
property. Only one (1) mobile home shall be permitted to be
parked on an individual lot or parcel.
The minimum lot s~ze, yard setbacks, required front yard,
and other zoning requirements of the applicable zoning
district shall be complied with, except that no mobile home
shall be located closer than 20 feet to any existing
residence.
No additional permanent-type living space may be added onto
a mobile home. All mobile homes shall be skirted but shall
no___~t be placed on a permanent foundation.
Se
Where public (County) water and/or sewer are available they
shall be used. '
Upon being granted a Mobile Home Permit, the applicant shall
then obtain the necessary permits from the Office of the
Building Official. This shall be done prior to the
installation or relocation of the mobile home.
w
Any violation of the above conditions shall be grounds for
revocation of the Mobile Home Permit.
: Unanimous
I. REQUESTS FOR REZONING
83S160
Bermuda Magisterial District, MARTIN E. WHITLEY requested a
al Use to permit a stock farm (goats and donkeys) in a
rial (R-7) District on an 8.0 acre parcel fronting
~tely 280 feet on the north line of Swineford Road
ately 250 feet east of its intersection with Westwood
. Tax Map 53-15 (1) Parcels 2 and 20 (Sheets 16 and 23).
· Balderson stated the Planning Co~nission had recommended
of the request. There was no one present representing the
icant. There was no opposition present. Mr. Dodd stated he
~4-50
Iwas aware the applicant would not be present today. He stated he
felt this request would improve the site in question. On motion
of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board approved this
request subject to the following conditions:
That the applicant install a fence 50 ft. off of the property
line on the east side of his property.
2. That this permit be granted for a five year period.
Vote: Unanimous
83S180
Mr. Applegate disclosed to the Board that his company is involved
in the sale of this property and excused himself from the meeting
because of a conflict of interest pursuant to the Virginia
Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act.
In Bermuda Magisterial District, JAY ROWE requested rezoning from
Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-9) of a 40 acre parcel
fronting approximately 1,400 feet on the north line of Centralia
Road approximately 300 feet east of Chester Road. Tax Map 97-2
(1) Part of Parcel 4 (Sheet 32).
Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission had recommended
denial of rezoning to Residential R-9 but approval of zoning to
Residential R-12. He stated the applicant had submitted a list
of proffers and, prior to this meeting had submitted additional
proffers.
Mr. Rowe stated they have been working on the project for three
years and the builder is Bogese, Inc., who is the largest
independent residential builde~ in the metropolitan area. He
indicated this parcel of property is adjacent to the railroad
tracks, there is a 7-11 store, there are power lines, as wall as
business zoning on the surrounding property. He presented slides
indicating the type of housing that would be constructed.
Mr. Hayes, attorney for the applicant, stated that a deferral at
the December meeting was requested to meet with area residents
regarding their opposition. He stated the concerns dealt with
lot size, foundation construction and size of the homes. He
stated that staff recommended approval of Residential (R-9)
without any proffers because they felt it was a transitional area
as it abuts commercial property on three sides. He stated the
people were concerned with the R-9 development detracting from
their homes and the developer has addressed this by proffering to
change the lot configuration for those lots which abut Centralia
Road. He distributed a layout as revised which would need
Planning Conm~ission approval. He stated that R-12 lots would
have a 90 ft. frontage at the building line on the Centralia Road
side. He stated they could have complied with the R-12
measurements on the Road "B" side but the lots would still have
been smaller on Centralia Road because of the configuration of
the layout. He stated they have changed lots 68-77 so that the
rear line of each lot is no less than 90 ft. which gives it the
same dimensions at that point as an R-12 lot and they have a
minimum of no less than 12,000 sq. ft. which is also an R-12
requirement except for the two models. He stated they have
.agreed to build the models on foundations, they will have brick
on the front, 90% of the homes will ~e built on foundations
rather than concrete slabs and the foundations will be brick or a
painted concrete facing. He stated they will have the homes in
size comparable to those of Cameron Run. He presented the Board
with a study of sales of homes ~] Cameron Run and a copy of the
amended proffers with regard to finished square footages, the
gross square footages, etc. He stated many of the lots would
comply w~th R-12 except those lots next to the commercial
~4-51
development which would be R-9.
on 40+ acres.
He stated there would be 96 lots
Mr. Paul Barr presented a petition signed by 400+ residents
opposed to this request. He presented pictures of homes which
were proposed for the area as well as a layout of the
development. He stated that they were concerned about the 10%
proposed to be built on slabs, that when Cameron Run was built it
was during a depressed building time, they were concerned about
the finished square footages proposed, they were concerned about
the size of the homes and lots, etc. He discussed the square
footages of Cameron Run now and in the future, the prices which
are $60,000-$80,000 and indicated these will be about $48,000 as
in Chesswood. He stated his home is valued at $125,000 and the
other residents are also concerned about the devaluation of their
property. He stated there is a lot of vacant land in the area
and approval of this request would set a precedent for R-9. He
requested that R-12 be approved with ranchers having 1,400 sq.
ft., two stories with 1,800 with 900 sq. ft. finished and the
other houses to have at least 1,600 sq. ft. with 1,000 sq. ft.
finished and an architectural committee with two members
representing the developer, two representing the home owners and
one person representing both and not just an architectural
committee by the developer. He stated the models are not always
what is built in the subdivision. He requested the Board to
consider the existing residents and requested that their values
not be jeopardized.
Mr. W. R. Floyd, President of the North Chester Homeowners
Association~ was present. He stated they are also opposed to
this request. He stated they take pride in their homes and would
like something constructed as comparable to their homes as
possible. He stated he was sad to hear that Cameron Run is the
home of the future° He stated an architectural committee was set
up at Cameron Run as well but it was sold to another person and
the architectural committee was never again consulted and the
homes are not up to standards set. He stated they agree with Mr.
Barr's comments.
Mrs. Margie Burton, resident of Kenda!e Acres, stated that the
residents are alarmed and concerned with regard to this
development because of the property values. She stated there
were restrictions on the original builders but they have sold out
and the new builders do not have to build within those
restrictions. She stated there is only one exit from the
property that is to be developed and stated her concerns for
emergency type situations.
Mr. Rowe stated Bogese is one of the builders in Chesswood but he
did not develop most homes but he is upgrading the quality for
those he is building. He discussed the square footage in Cameron
Run and what was built in 1983 would be planned in the future.
Mr. Hayes stated this would be a self-contained area, all those
lots that can be seen will have R-12 dimensions, this is a
transition area, and stated this is a viable proposal.
Mr. Dodd thanked both for the presentations. He stated that
Cameron Run was an old R-7 zoning and when the County was rezoned
in 1972, all of Chester was put R-7 and it has caused a lot of
problems and that is how Cameron Run was zoned but there was some
negotiations with regard to architecture. He stated it was
developed with fairly decent eye appeal but it has not made
everyone happy. He stated in lo~king at this, he has never put a
motion before the Board which he did not feel comfortable with
and the best that could be done. He stated he has had a real
dilemma with what is right and comfortable and he is not
comfortable. He stated he would concede that with the existing
commercial and possible highway comin~ in the area, this property
will develop. He stated there is a difference of opinion of what
should go here as he feels it should have some office space and
then residential but the land does not lie correctly to make it
84-52
~nomically feasible. He stated this would be a starter home
sion but the people feel they have enough of that on them
He stated Mineola is deplorable and disgraceful as there
re houses with 800 sq. ft. on six inch foundations, poor quality
~erial, etc. He stated the community is incensed. He stated
would ask Mr. Rowe to withdraw or defer until he can come
.oser to what the community is thinking with regard to lot size,
uare footage and an architectural committee. He stated if the
loper cannot work with these items, then he sees no need to
He stated he would also like to challenge the
]ilders association to come up with proffered standards for
~is Board to deal with such as heat pumps, bay
~ows--aesthetics which can assure people of a quality product.
stated this is not self-contained development as it also
involves parks, schools, roads, etc. After further discussion,
Rowe stated he would accept a deferral.
motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
consideration of this request until February 22, 1984
ith the applicant to consider further the architectural
~ommittee and the larger square footage and meet with the
residents, especially those present today, and Mr. Dodd.
les:
Mr. Daniel, Mr. Dodd, Mrs. Girone and Mr. Mayes.
Mr. Applegate.
· Applegate returned to the meeting.
83S156
In Bermuda Magisterial District, KENNETH G. LYERLY requested
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12) of a 9.59
acre parcel which lies approximately 237 feet off the south line
of Ecoff Avenue, measured from a point approximately 650 feet
east of Chalkley Road, and lies at the western terminus of
Elfinwood Road. Tax Map 114-4 (1) Part of Parcel 21 (Sheet 31).
Balderson stated the Planning Commission had recommended
denial of the request for R-12 with proffered conditions but
recommended approval of R-25. Mr. Carro~ugh was present and
stated the recommendation of R-25 was acceptable and they would
~hdraw the proffers.
Mr. William Wyatt, opposed to the request for R-12, stated he
not certain what this meant. He stated that he had talked
Gladys Layle, the Boggs and the Robertsons, and they were
concerned with the den:~i, ty and wants this to be consistent with
Buxton. He stated he is not sure of their opposition since the
R-25 has been accepted and obviously it will address their
concern for density. He stated if the homes are consistent with
Buxton with regard to density and quality there should be no
opposition.
Mr. Robert Schropner stated they were concerned that this was a
transition piece of property from Ecoff Road where they are
building now to the Buxton area and they were concerned about the
house and lot sizes and they are surprised about this change.
Mr. Dodd stated the Planning Commission went strictly on a larger
lot which is large for today's standards, and economics would
dictate that you could not put a $40,000 house on a lot that size
but would necessitate a larger house. There was some discussion
regarding conditions and covenants and Mr. Carrough stated he
could not commit the developer to anythJ, ng at this point.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
denied the request for R-15 and approved R-25 zoning.
84-53
Vote: Unanimous
83S207
In Bermuda Magisterial District, BILLY MILLER requested a
Conditional Use Planned Development to permit a single family
residence in a General Business (B-3) District, plus a 1.9 foot
exception to the 30 foot setback requirement on a 0.69 acre
iparcel fronting approximately 150 feet on Jefferson Davis Highway
and also fronting approximately 200 feet on Falling Creek Avenue,
and located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of
~these roads. Tax Map 42-15 (4) Falling Creek, Lot 6 (Sheet 16).
~r. Bal. derson stated the Planning Commission had recommended
approval of this request subject to certain conditions. Mr.
Miller stated the conditions were acceptable. There was no
opposition present. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs.
Girone, the Board approved this request subject to the following
conditions:
This Conditional U~-:e Planned Development shall be granted to
and for Billy Miller and his immediate family only, and
shall not be transferable nor run with the land.
The conditions herein notwithstanding, the plan prepared by
Harvey L. Parks, Inc., dated 6/8/83, shall be considered the
Master Plan.
Prior to release of an occupancy permit, thirty (30) feet of
right of way, measured from the centerline of Falling Creek
Avenue, shall be dedicated to and for the County of
Chesterfield, free and unrestricted.
One (1) access shall be permitted to this site. This access
shall be located north of the existing structure. Prior to
occupancy, this entrance shall be constructed to VDH&T
specifications. Along the remaining length of Jefferson
Davis ~{ighway, a barrier (i.e., timber curbs, berm, etc.)
shall be constructed to preclude access to the site except
via the access described herein.
Se
Parking areas shall be graveled with a minimum of four (4)
inches of 21 or 2].A stone. Parking areas shall be
delineated by a durable material such as timber curbs.
(Note: .Prior to obtaining occupancy permits: (1) schematic
plans reflecting required improvements must be submitted to the
Planning Commission for approval; (2) site plans must be
submitted to the Planning Department for approval; and (3) the
site must be constructed in accordance with the approved plans.)
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Dodd excused himself from the meeting to attend another
meeting with }IUD in Richmond regarding Bermuda District.
83S!29
In Matoaca Magisterial District, LEONARD COX requested a Condi-
tional Use to permit a boarding house (9 tenants) in a
Residential (R-7) District on a 0.188 acre parcel fronting
approximately 50 feet on Light Street and approximately 160 feet
on Bremo Avenue, and located in the northeast quadrant of the
intersection of these roads and better known as 3310 Light
Street. Tax Map 182-14 (1) Parcel 64 (Sheet 53/54).
Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission had recommended
denial of the request. Mr. Cox was pzesent. Mr. Mayes stated he
felt the conditions were unclear and inquired if Mr. Cox would
84-54
consider a 60 day deferral. Mr. Cox agreed.
opposition present·
There was no
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
deferred consideration of this request until March 28, 1984 in
order for the conditions to be clarified for the applicant.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Applegate, Mrs. Girone and Mr. Mayes.
Absent: Mr. Dodd.
83S115
In Midlothian Magisterial District, GEORGE D. AND NETTIE C.
McCENEY requested rezoning from Agricul.tural (A) and Residential
(R-15) to Office Business (O) with a Conditional Use Planned
Development of a 7.6 acre parcel fronting approximately 450 feet
on North Providence Road and approximately 250 feet on Buford
Road, and located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection
of these roads. Tax Map 18-15 (1) Parcel 18 and Tax Map 18-16
(1) Parcel 3 (Sheet 8).
Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission had recommended
approval of this request subject to certain conditions. Mr.
McCeney was present. There was no opposition present. On motion
of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board approved
this request subject to the following conditions:
e
The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan prepared
by J.K. Timmons and Associates, dated 3/23/83, revised
12/2/83, shall be considered the Master Plan.
Additional pavement and curb and gutter shall be constructed
along North Providence and Buford Roads; the exact length
and width to be determined at the time of schematic plan
review.
When access is constructed into this site and no later than
April 1985, the drive to the existing structure shall be
relocated to provide access via the new drive to North
Providence Road.
A thirty (30) foot buffer shall be maintained in good
condition along' the north and east property lines adjacent
to Residential (R-J5) zoning. Existing vegetation shall be
maintained and supplemented where necessary to effectively
screen this use from adjacent residential property. A six
(6) foot high solid board fence shall be constructed and
maintained in good condition along the centerline of this
buffer. Sewer and water lines and drainage improvements
shall not be permitted within this buffer. Landscaping
plans depicting this requirement shall be submitted to the
Planning Commission for approval in conjunction with
schematic plan review.
Lighting shall be low level, not to exceed a height of
fifteen (15) feet, and positioned so as not to project light
into adjacent residential properties. A lighting plan
depicting this requirement shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for approval in conjunction with final
site plan submission.
The ponds downstream shall be analyzed to determine capacity
for stormwater runoff. Depending on the results of this
analysis, either on-site retention shall be employed or
off-site easements acquired snd drainage improvements
accomplished. (EE)
Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed along driveways
and parking areas.
84-55
10.
11.
.3.
~yes:
There shall be no individual lot access to North Providence
or Buford Roads. All access shall be confined to the drive
from North Providence Road.
If the proposed access to North Providence Road is
constructed as a public road, schematic plans to include
pavement width, curb and gutter, etc. shall be submitted to
the Planning Con~ission for approval in conjunction with the
first schematic plan submission. Prior to obtaining any
building permits, road and drainage plans shall be approved
by VDH&T and Environmental Engineering. If the access is
constructed as a private easement, it shall have a minimum
pavement width of thirty (30) feet plus curb and gutter.
A thirty (30) foot setback shall be maintained along North
Providence and Buford Roads. Within this setback, a three
(3) to four (4) foot high undulating berm shall be
constructed where necessary to preclude visibility of
driveways and parking areas from North Providence and Buford
Roads. This berm shall be landscaped with ornamental trees,
shrubs and ground cover. A landscaping plan depicting this
requirement shall be submitted to the Planning Commission
for approval in conjunction with schematic plan submission
for those sites fronting North Providence and Buford Roads.
SIGNS
A single freestanding sign, visible from North
Providence and Buford Roads, shall be permitted
identifying this development and the tenants therein.
This sign shall not exceed a height of ten (10) feet
and an area of fifty (50) square feet.
be
One (1) individual freestanding business sign, per
freestanding principal building, shall be permitted
along the proposed drive, provided the sign is
positioned so that it is not visible from North
Providence or Buford Roads. These signs shall not
exceed an area of ten (10) square feet and a height of
five (5) feet.
Co
Building moun~ed signs shall be permitted provided they
do not project above the roof line, and the aggregate
area of the building sign plus the individual building
freestandinq sign does not exceed 0.5 square feet for
each foot of building frontage.
de
Signs may be illuminated, but may be luminous only if
the sign field is opaque with translucent letters.
Directional signs (entrance/exit, etc.) shall be
governed by Zoning Ordinance requirements.
Prior to erection of any signs, a comprehensive sign
package to include colors, materials and typical
designs shall be submitted to the Planning Commission
for approval. Signs shall blend with the architectural
style of the development.
g. There shall be no temporary or reader board signs.
At the time of schematic plan review, the Commission shall
determine the required pavement widening ~nd other necessary
improvements along North Providence and Buford Roads.
Buildings shall not exceed a height of two (2) stories.
Mr. Daniel, Mr. Applegate, Mrs. Girone and Mr. Mayes
Mr. Dodd.. ~
84-56
83S164
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, BELMONT HILLS RECREATION
CENTER, INC. requested an amendment to a Conditional Use (Case
75A026) to permit: (1) deletion of the 35 foot buffer along the
southern boundary of Parcel 2, Tax Map 40-10 (1); (2) extend the
hours of operation from 11:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. on weekends; and
a Conditional Use Planned Development to permit: (1) expansion
of the recreational facility on Part of Parcel 37A, Tax Map 40-14
(1); (2) an exception to the requirement that parking areas be
paved; and (3) a 15 foot exception to the 30 foot front yard
setback for buildings in a Residential (R-7) District on a 3.0
acre parcel which lies between the eastern and western terminuses
of Silliman Road. Tax Map 40-10 (1) Parcel 2 and Tax Map 40-14
(1) Part of Parcel 37A (Sheet 15).
Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission had recommended
approval of I.A. - an amendment to Conditional Use (Case 75A026)
to permit deletion of a 35 foot buffer along a portion of the
southern boundary of Parcel 2, Tax Map 40-10 (1); II. A, B, C -
Conditional Use Planned Development to permit: (a) expansion of
the recreational facility on Part of Parcel 37A, Tax Map 40-14
(1); (b) an exception to the requirement that parkings areas be
paved; and (c) a 15 foot exception to the 30 foot front yard
setback requirement for buildings in a residential (R-7)
district, subject to certain conditions and further recommended
denial to the request (I.B.) to amend Conditional Use 75A026 to
extend the hours of operation from 11:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. on
weekends for the proposed community center only.
Mr. Yogi Berger, President of the Belmont Hills Recreation
Association, stated there is some opposition because of concern
for parking, trespassing by non-members, noise and appearance of
the center. He reviewed the plans for the center with regard to
drainage, parking, grading, etc. He stated the parking expansion
will eliminate the congestion near the homes. He stated they
would install a street light and barrier across the road which
would eliminate unauthorized parking after hours. He stated they
have made arrangements to relocate the speakers, eliminate loud
speaker use during the day except for emergencies, control and
monitor music for social activities, etc. He stated the
appearance is another concern which would have to be approved by
the Planning Commission but it would be in conformance with the
residential area and would be submitted to the Civic Association
for approval. He stated the denial of the extension of hours,
only pertained to the co~nunity center after it was built.
Mr. Edward Spain presented a letter stating his objections to the
club house. He discus:~ed the parking spaces which will add only
3 or 4 spaces and would not eliminate tlhe traffic congestion and
would hinder access for emergency vehicles to the area, there is
a 2-1 grade behind the club house, the loud noise, etc. He
stated if this club house is allowed to be built it would be a
continuation of the problems in the summer. He stated they do
not maintain the facilities that exist. He stated he was
concerned with the devaluation of his property.
Mr. Applegate stated he had several problems with this request,
the largest being the parking and traffic congestion. He
inquired if staff took into consideration the membership and the
required parking spaces necessary to accommodate their membership
of 147 people. Mr. Balderson stated there are standards for
different types of facilities and they looked at the number of
spaces provided for each. He stated staff did not have a problem
with the parking allowed but that there could be a problem with
certain activities that would required additional spaces. He
stated generally their recommendation was based on what could
reasonably be required. He stated ideally, a recreation
association is best planned when it is removed from the
residential areas. Mr. App]egate also expressed concern
regarding the extension of hours of operation and stated he would
not like to have them extended to 1:00 a.m.
84-57
After further consideration of this matter, it was on motion of
Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, resolved that this request
be deferred until March 28, 1984 to allow the applicant to
present a detailed parking plan for the area.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Applegate, Mrs. Girone and Mr. Mayes.
Absent: Mr. Dodd.
Mr. Balderson stated staff would need the plan within 30 days for
review. Mr. Mayes suggested the applicant also meet with the
neighbors regarding the concerns and make them aware of the
plans. Mr. Berger stated this would be accomplished.
83S171
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, W. A. HIXSON AND C. W. WERTZ
requested amendments to Conditional Use Planned Development
74S054 to permit exceptions to side yard building and front yard
parking setback requirements in a Light Industrial (M-l) District
on a 1.2 acre parcel fronting approximately 120 feet on the north
line of Hull Street Road approximately 310 feet east of Speeks
Drive. Tax Map 49-6 (1) Part of Parcel 1 (Sheet 14).
Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission had recommended
approval of this request subject to certain conditions. Mr. Jim
Hayes was present representing the applicant. There was no one
present in opposition. On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by
Mr. Mayes, the Board approved this request subject to the
following conditions:
The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan prepared
by J.K. Timmons and Associates shall be considered the plan
of development.
Within the twenty-five (25) foot setback along Route 360, a
three (3) to four (4) foot high undulating berm shall be
installed. This berm shall be landscaped with ornamental
trees and shrubs. A landscaping plan depicting this
requirement shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for approval in conjunction with final site plan review.
A sidewalk, at least three (3) feet in width, shall be
provided from the rear parking area to the front of the
building and along the east side of the building. However,
if pedestrian access to all commercial establishments within
the structure is provided from each separate parking area,
then the sidewalk shall not be required.
In conjunction with the approval of this request, the
Planning Commission shall grant schematic approval of the
Master Plan.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr~ Applegate, Mrs. Girone and Mr. Mayes.
Absent: Mr. Dodd.
83S179
In Dale Magisterial District, CONT]iNENTAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-9) of
a 42 acre parcel which lies at the northern terminus of
Orchardhill Drive and approximately 350 feet west of the terminus
of Bridgeside Drive. Tax Map 66-6 (1) Parcel 1 (Sheet 22).
Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission had recommend
approval of this request subject to acceptance of the proffered
conditions. Mr. November was present. There was no opposition
present. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the
Board approved the request subject to acceptance of the following
proffered conditions:
(1) the lot width shall be a minimum of 80 feet at the
84-5,q
established building line; (2) the front yard setback shall
be a minimum of 35 feet; (3) the total square footage of
each lot shall be a minimum of 10,500; and (4) no plans for
a primary dwelling shall be approved unless the living area
of such a dwelling, exclusive of one-story open porches and
garages, shall equal or exceed the following minimum
standards:
Two-story residences - 1,600 sq. ft.
Ranch homes - 1,300 sq. ft.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Applegate, Mrs. Girone and Mr. Mayes.
Absent: Mr. Dodd.
83S198
In Matoaca Magisterial District, DANIEL A. PATROM requested
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-15) on a 2.323
acre parcel fronting approximately 168 feet on the south line of
Centralia Road opposite its intersection with Shiloh Road. Tax
Map 96-8 (1) Parcels 38 and 40 (Sheet 31).
Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission had recommended
approval of this request. Mr. Patrom was present. There was no
opposition present. On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mrs.
Girone, the Board approved this request.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Applegate, Mrs. Girone and Mr. Mayes.
Absent: Mr. Dodd.
83S200
In Midlothian Magisterial District, BRUCE A. AND JEANETTE A. RUSH
requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Light Industrial
(M-l) plus a Conditional Use Planned Development to permit
exceptions to the use and bulk requirements, and an amendment to
a previously granted Conditional Use Planned Development (Case
83S060) to relocate a buffer along the northern property line.
These requests lie on a 0.06 acre parcel lying approximately 180
feet off the south line of Robious Road, approximately 800 feet
west of Old Bon Air Road. Tax Map 17-7 (1) Parts of Parcels 16
and 17 (Sheet 8).
Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission had recommended
approval of this request subject to certain conditions. Mr.
Hayes was present r~presenting the applicant. There was no
opposition present. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr.
Applegate, the Board approved this request subject to the
following conditions:
The buffer previously required along the northern boundary
of Parcels 16 and ].7, Tax Map 17-7, for Case 83S060 shall be
moved, as indicated on the plan prepared by J.K. Timmons and
Associates, dated November 3, 1983. All applicable
conditions cf Ca~e 83S060 shall be required for this
relocated buffer.
In conjunction with the approval of this request, the
Commission shall grant schematic plan approval of the plan
prepared by JoK. Timmons and Associates, dated November 3,
1983.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Applegate, Mrs. Gi]?one and Mr. Mayes.
Absent: Mr. Dodd.
83S202
Mr. Applegate disclosed to the Board that his company was
recently hired by t!~e developer and excused himself from the
84-59
meeting because of a possible conflict of interest pursuant to
the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act.
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, THE PLANNING AND DESIGN
COLLABORATIVE requested an amendment to a previously granted
Conditional Use Planned Development (Case 74S021) to allow a
nursing home and supporting commercial uses in a Residential
(R-7) District on a 30.175 acre parcel fronting approximately
1,600 feet on the sonth line of Old Hundred Road, approximately
5,800 feet west of Genito Road. Tax Map 36 (1) Part of Parcel 4
(Sheet 13).
Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission had recommended
approval of this request subject to certain conditions. Mr.
J. B. Campbell was present and requested that condition #2 be
eliminated as condition #3 impacts the original layout and the
architects may want to change the building style. Mr. Balderson
stated the words "similar to" could be added and be satisfactory
to all. Mr. Campbell stated that would be acceptable. After
further discussion, it was on motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by
Mrs. Girone, resolved that this request be approved subject to
the following conditions:
This amendment shall be for Tract 731, as designated on
Brandermill's Master Plan, and shall permit the constructior
of a 60 bed nursing facility and supporting uses as
specified in the textual statement titled: "Brandermill
Woods," prepared by A.O. Jones & Co.
Note: Multifamily units are permitted under Case 74S021.
The architectural style of the structure shall be similar
the renderings submitted with the application.
e
Ail structures, shall be located a minimum of 100 feet from
the ultimate right of way of Old Hundred Road. All parking
and driveway areas shall be located a minimum of fifty (50)
feet from the ultimate right of way of Old Hundred Road.
These areas shall be maintained as a natural buffer which
shall be supplemented with additional vegetation, where
necessary, to effect proper screening. A landscaping plan
depicting this requirement shall be submitted to the
Planning Co~mission for approval in conjunction with
schematic plan review.
Note: Ail applicable conditions of Case 74S021 regarding
multifamily development, right of way dedication, open space,
etc. shall apply to this development.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mrs. Girone and Mr. Mayes.
Absent: Mr. Applegate and Mr. Dodd.
Mr. Applegate returned to tke meeting.
10. ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
adjourned at 4:15 p.m. until 2:00 p.m. on February 8, 1984.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Applegate, M~s. Girone and Mr. Mayes.
Absent: Mr. Dodd.
Ri~H~rd L. Hedrick
County Administrator
Harry ~. Daniel
Chairman
84-60