03-26-1986 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVI.~ORS
MINUTES
March 26, 1986
Supe=visors in Attendance~
Mr. R. Carland Dodd, Chairman
Mr. Harry G. Daniel, Vice Chairman
Fir. G. ~. Applegate
Mrs. Joan Girone
Mr. Jesse J. Mayes
Mr. Richerd L. Eedrick
county Administrator
Staff in Attendance:
Oir., ~¢en. Develop.
Legislativm Coord.
Asst. Co. Admin.
of Parks &
Duildlng 0fficial
Dir. of Ce~, Services
circuit Court Clerk
Asst. CO. Admln. for
Dir. of Env. Eng.
~. Jeffrey Muzzy,
Asst. Co. Ac]min.
of Budge~ ~ Acc=g.
Dix. uf Utilities
Mr. Pred~riek W. Willls~
Dir. nf H~man
of Planning
Mr. Dodd called the meeting to o~der et the COurtkouue ut 9:00
a.m. (~$T).
1. INVOCATION
Mr. ~edrick introduced Pastor Fred clemens of the First Church
God, who gave the invocation.
~. PLEDGE 0P A?.?~GIANCE TO T~ FLA~ OF T~E UNITED STAT~S OF
AMERICA
The Pledge o~ Allegiance to the Flag cf th~ Unite~ State~ of
America was recited.
86-224
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Appl~gate~ the Board
approved the minutes of March 12, 1~S6, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
4, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S CO~ENTS
Mr. ~e~riok weluom~d th~ s%~d~nt~ participating iD Model County
Administrator for Development, had resigned and accepted the
tha~ Mr. Mussy has been with th~ County for eight years and bas
done an outstanding job and his expertise will be mi~ed.
Mr. Applegate stated the capital Region Airport commission
mpproved the final feasibility study ~or the additional expansion
to ~he current ~yrd Airport ex~an~ion. He s~ated th~
announcement was al~o made of the pending r~tirement of
~thony D~d who had b~n with the Cotillion for 34
~s. Girone stated ~he MP0 ~t yesterday and forwarded to the
Governor's C~is~ion on ~ad$, l~t~ from ~he individual
localities of their top priorities. She stated Chesterfield
NPO also r¢co~n~ed the C~is~ion eon~ide~ or work toward th~
completion of ~h~ inner and cuter circ~ferential in ~he Ric~und
Region and that ~ey investigate a stable funding source for
transit for the GRTC as they are experiencing problam~ with
federal funding, etc. She ~tated feelingm were also
for th~ budget of the ~0 they included ~deTtaking a ~t~dy of
the transportation needs in the region which would involve buses,
taxis~ rail, utc.
6. F~QUESTS TO POSTPONE AC~ION.~. F24~RGENCY ADDITIONS O~ C~ARG~S
IN THE ORDER OF PRESERVATION
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by ~. Xayes, th~ ~oard deferre.
Item ~4 which involv~ th~ introduction of M~. Herr Siegfried
Ha~De, Director of B~hindert~n~ntr~ Hannov~r, ~9~ny, ~ntit
2:00 9.m.~ that Item ll.F.2.a., Re,est from Residents of
s~onehenge S~divi$ion for ~ublic Sewer ~rvice be deferred uutil
~y 28~ 1986; that Items ll.A,~ Adoption Of th= 1986-87 Budget
i~ediately roll,lng Item 9.A.; that It~ ll.L. be added for an
~MK vs. Walsey pursuant to Section 2.1-344 {a} (6) of the Code
Virginia, 1~50, as amended; and adopted th~ agenda as amended.
7. R~OLUTION$ OF S~ECIAL R~CO~NITION
7.A." ~R'."~'K. C'LA'RY, U~!LITIE$ DEPARTMENT
~r. Welchons outline~ Mr. Clary'~ dedic~te~
the County.
On ~oeion of the B~ard, the following resolution
~EREAS, M~. John K. Cla~ will retire from the Utilities
Depar~un:, chesterfield county, on April I, 1986~ and
fl6-225
WHEREAS, Mr. Clary has provided 21 year~ of quality eervio~
to the citizens of Chesterfield County; aad
will miss Mr. Clary's diliqent service.
NOW, THEPd~FOP~, B~ IT R~$OL~D that this Board of
Supervisors publicly recoqni~em Mr. Clary and extends om behalf
of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County their
appreciation for his service to the County.
AND BE IT ~URT~R RESOLVED~ that a copy of this resolution
be presented to Mr. Clary and that this =ese!u~ien be permanentl'
~eeorde~ a~aong the pap~Cs of thim Boar~ of Supervisors of
Chesterfield Cowry, Virginia.
~. Dodd presented Mr. clary with the ex~cutud resolution and
appreciation for this ~soognition.
7.B, MS, LOIS T. C~ODE, SHERIFF'S DEPArTMeNT
Mr. Willis introduced Sheriif Wingo'. Sheriff ~inge was present
and outlined Ms. Goode'z dedicated and loyal service to ~he
County and indicated she could not be present at this time.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
W~/$REA$, ~s. Lois T. Goode will retire from th~ Sheriff's
Department~ Chesterfield County~ on April 1, I986; and
~ER~AS, M~. Goode has provided 24 years of quality ~ervice
to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and =he Board of Supervisors
will miss MS. Goode's diligent service.
NOW~ THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED that this Board of
supervisors publicly recognizes MS. Goode and extends on behalf
of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County their
appreoiation for her service to the County.
A/~D BE IT FURTHER RE$OLVED~ that a copy of this resolution
be presented to Ms. Goode and that this resolution be permanently
recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County, Virginia. ~.
Vote: Unanimous
Ma. Dedd presented sheriff wingo with the exesuted resolution on
behalf of Mrs. Goode.
?,C. MS. FI~KNCES ~. WRIGHT, CIP4tUIT COURT
~ir. Willis introduced Mr. Livingston. Mr. Livingston outlined
M~. ~right's d~dicated and loyal service tO the CO,Dry.
On motion of ~he Boasd, the following resolution was adopted:
WSER~A~, ~s. ~rances $. Wright will retire from the Circuit
Court~ Chesterfield County, on April 1~ 1986; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Wright has provided 23 years of quality
service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
W~R~AS, Ms. Wright has se~ed under four Clerks which
represents one-third cf ihs elected Ci=~k~ of Circuit Court since
chesterfield county's begi~ing in 1749; and
86-226
fm--k
WHEREAS, Che~terfiel~ County and ~he Board of Supervisors
will miss MS. WrigDt's diligent service.
NOW, THEREFO/~E, BE IT RESOLVED that this Board of
Snpervlsorm publicly recognizes M~. Wright and extends on behalf
of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield COunty their
appreciation for her service to th~ COunty.
AND ~ IT FURTMBR BE$0LV~Dr that a copy of thla resolution
be presented to Ms. Wright and that this resolution b~
permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of
sup~visor~ of Chesterfiel~ County~ Virginia.
~ir. DO~ p~eSen~ed MS. W~ight wi~h the executed resolution ~d
recognized~. Wright who was also present. MS. Wright expressed
appreciation ior this recognition.
Mr. Stith stated that Rpril 30, 19~6 had be=n designated as Model
County Government Day but prior to that date, there are a series
of training sessions. Me ~tated ~oday is one of those sessions
officials, etc. He introduced Ms. Leiqh Chase, Supervisor of
Social gtudi~s for the School System, and MS. Anne Thweatt,
Senior Administrative Intern from Virginia ~tate university, who
had orqanized this activity.
On motion of the Boafd~ the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Students in the eleventh and twelfth grades in
Chesterfield County Schools have been s=u~yinq local gover~ent;
re, resent their schools in portraying the r01e~ of County
ofii¢ials on the 30th day of April, 1986~ and
W~ER~AS, The Chesterfield County Board of
recoqniz~s the importance of young people having opportunities to
lear~ about their government, in order for them to become
resDonsible citizens.
NOW, TME~FORE, BE IT ~SOL~D by ~he Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors, that the 30th day of ~pril, 1986, be
declared as ~del Co,dy Government Day 1986 and that this
observance be called To ~he a%~en=ion of all citizeas.
County Government Day act{vit~es. She stated that this iza
joint sponsorship of the school system and th~ local
~hieh allow~ the ~t~dene~ the opport~ity to look at local
governmen~ first hand and to get a b~tter under,tending of what
=he officials do. She sta~ed that past participants have
of the activities that the students would be involved in.
Hedrick $tate~ this was a ~ine opportunity %o have the young
people learn about their gover~ent and how it operates and
~y lead to some students becoming f=buze County employees but it
the operation of the local gover~ent. The students introduced
86-227
DEFERRED ITEMS
~lr. Applegate disclosed to the Board that he i~ a trustes and
part ewne~ of property that could be served by the Spring Run
trunk sewer, declared a possible conflict of i~terest pursuant to
the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interezt Act and
excused himself from the meetin9.
9.A. CONDEMNATION OF S~W~ ~AsEFiENT FOR SPRING RUN TRUNK SEW~
TO SERVE DEER RUN SUBDIVISIO~
~. Welchons stated that the County staff had mat with Dr. and
Nr~. Charles Henry and of£ere~ them ~2,524.00 far the aequisltlon
of the offsite sewer easement for Deer Run subdivislon. He
stated since that time, a verbal counteroffer from the Henry's
had teen received in the amount Of $]5,000. H~ stated staff
r~co~uends that the counteroffer be denied, that condemnatioD
proceedings be instituted and that ~egetiations will continue.
F~. Mayas inquired how the $25,00~ figure was determined an~ if
that had anything to dc with the County going onto the property
and claarin~ land without permission. ~r. Welch~na state~ the
County was not involved in this Gleaning, i~ was the developer
the adjacent subdivision and they did sc without ~he County's
knowledge or permission. ~r. welchons s~ated that any l~gal
action would be against the developer and not the County and that
if neqotiatlonS are ec~ reached, t-kc Courts could take all of
these matters into consideration. Mr. Niayes statsd this mat~er
had been 4eferrad to allow time for the staff to discuss the
~att~r with the ~enry's and inquired what the result was.
We!chess s~atsd the counteroffer was made at that time. Mr.
Welchons stated for the Board's information that if the ~enry's
property were develope~, the sewer line would have to be
installed in about th~ same location aa well. Mr. Mayas ~tated
this was understood bet he was concerned with the procedures
followed.
Mrs. Henry stated the $2~,000 wa~ suggestmd and they did
with the staff on Monday. She ~tated that since the easement in
1400 feet there could be ~4 building lots and it will increase
the value of each by $2~000, it would be approximately
Sh~ stated staff did indicat0 it was the developer and not the
County who had done the clearing of the land, She stated they
are still opposed to the easement and inquired why one citizen
would be penalized for the benefit of another. Mr. ~ayes stated
th~ ~ew~r line would inereas~ the value o~ their property. Mrs.
Henry stated that would probably be th~ case if they had plans
for development which they do ~ot. ~4r. Mayas stated it appear~
there is an impasse~ damages to the property ara beyond the
~uthority of this Soard, and hs could ~ee no alternative but to
let the Courts decide th~ issue.
On motion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board re%used
the counteroffer in the amount cf $25,0~0 from Dr. an~ Mrs.
Charles W. Henry and authori=e~ the County A~torney to institute
condemnation proceedings against th~ following property owners if
the amount as set opposite their na~%ss is not accepted. And be
it further resolved that the Ccunt~ Administrator ~otify said
property owners by reglmters~ mail on ~4arch 27, I986 of the
County's intention to enter upon and take the property which
to be the subject of said condemnation proceedings. This action
is on an emergency basis and the County intand~ tO oxen=isa
immediate right of entry pursuant to Section 15.t-238.1 of the
Code of Virginia.
Dr. and Mrs. Charles W. Eenry Spring RUb Trunk Sewer $2,524
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, ~r. Daniel, Mrs. ~i~one and ~ir.
Absent: ~r. Applegata.
~Irs. Gixene inquired i~ anything could be ~one to hide the
manhol~s that will be coustructed. Mr. WeIchons s%a~e~ the
manholes are usually constructed above the flood plain elevation
so when there are floods they are protected from infiltrati0n but
g6-22S
he wonld ch~ck into the matter and work with the Henry's in this
Mr, Applegate returned to the meeting.
11. N~W BUSINESS
ll.A. CONSIDEt{ATION OF TBE 198~6--87 BUDGET
~[r. ~edrick stated per the Board'~ discussion last ni~ht, staff
had prepared a paper which in~i=ates a way to include the
the ~eard was interested in addin~ to the proposed budqet and at
the ~ame time bring the cost close to the figure that was
intended in the proposed budget f~om the administration. Mr.
R~m~=y stated additionz =o =he budget r~oo~ended by the Board a~
it~ work session last night totalled $3,476,~00 wi~ the
d~le=ions from ~he budget totalling $1,766,S0~. He stated it i~
basically a difference of $1,670,800 and staff
re~uctlons through the exce~s a~ou~t turned bask by the Schools
~ranting the 3% increase in salaries for employees within
~xistiu9 funds, reducing ~he suhoui increase ~rom $1,875,000 to
$500,000 assuming higher growth will provide n~ded funds in
1987-88.
~r. Daniel ~tated he understo~ the $48~000 for the
~ymphony had b~en added ~aek, ~. ~msey stated the= was
correct. ~. Daniel inquired what th= different% was between t~
County's p~oposed budge= and the request from the schools.
talking with bis School Fuard representative, ~t wa~ indicated
~he first thing that would be cut would be the purchase of schoo
next year the same buses will Co~t mor~. He inquired if
board transfsrred the $400,000 and funded everythin~ but that,
whac would the tax rat~ be. ~r. ~msey stated it would b~
ann:her $.01 on the tax rate and would be approximately $100,000
short.
~. Applugatu stated %hat the Board started o~ with a tax rate
of $1.03 last ~igh= a= ~h~ work session which was the County
A~inistrator's proposed budge=. ~e stated d~ring th~ course of
thm work s~ions, the ~o~rd r~que~ted a 98¢ tax budget.
stata~ after each supervisor included their additions and
s~traction~ (while he ~orked off of ~he 98¢ tax rate and
everyone ~lse off of $1,03) the ~oar~ did not address items in
th~ 98¢ budge~ whioh were actually suqgested as potential
$1.03 and adjusted it aocordingly at which time the $1.05 rate
discuss but retained items such as a ~p study, f~ds for the
building inspeotions office, additional parks an~ recreational
acti~iticu~ ~uduction to polic=~ the legislative coordinator,
fire department, etc. He ~%atad he felt the Board had a
responsibility to identify the "wants" and the "needs" and he
would support tie "needs" but he felt the "wants" could wait.
stated he wa~ concerned with th~ $1.03 and the $t.0~ tax
$1.03 and that Could not be reduced and the compromise would be
~i,S4 with the additioD$ for
a pro~e~ when alt agreed the County need~ mo~ funds. He stat~
the disagreement is how we spen~ those funds and th~ me~hods ~o
raise the.money. He ~ta~ed ~he~e ar~ a lot of "wants" in the
the approach 0n ho~ to raise the ~On=y. He stated he d~d not
86-229
feel it fair to put the entire burden on the single family
property owners of the Connty of a rate of $1.03+ when there are
alternatives such as a utility tax which would spread %he tax
evenly to all. Me stated with a $1.00 tax rate and a utility tax'
the same things could be accomplished but there seems to be a
reluctance by the Board to consider a utility tax. He stated
there =~e 63 other counties in the Skate who do this and it woul~
generate $2,300,000. Be stated another alternative would be to
h~ll taxes quarterly which would generate revenues o~
$400,000-$5D0,000. Ee stated he had problems when a business
license ~er a service ~tati0n was $2~800 and for a branch bank
wa~ only $50. ~e stated meme of these =hingm need to be
distributed evenly. He stated he would not support $1+03+ ~$
tax rate on real p~opsrty.
Mr. Mayas ~tated he was unaware of the utility tax alternative.
Mr. Daniel inquired why this wa~ not brought up a~ the time of
the bond referendum. Ee stated the public hearings were no~ set
in place for the establishment of a utility tax and the timing
will no= allow i= ~o be accomplished for this budget. Mr. Ramse~
explained that the difference between & utility ra~e and tax
in~icatin~ that a ut~Iity rate would not recognize inflation as
it would be a set rate per month and the growth in =hat revenue
larger utilify rate to offset the growth than if there were an
increase in the real estate rate. Be stated a utility tax would
have to ~ $1.00-$1~25 per month. ~e stated witk the real
tax rate that is included.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayas, it is hereby
resolved that the 1986-87 Budget ~e a~opted as follows:
FUND
General Fund
School fund
R~venue Sharin~
Vehicle and Communication~ Maintenance
Airport
Nursing Hcme
Utilities
TOTAL
TOTAL
$156,821,80~
1~X,4~,700
30~800
~,565,900
1~097~50~
4,512,500
37~i59,60~
$265~028,500
It i~ noted that the County Administrator's Proposed Budget is
=mended as follows.
Add Expenditures:
o Roads $ 500,000
o Schools 1,300,000
o Peli~e 300,00~
O School Guardg
o So~ial Services 85~000
o Libraries 6~,000
c Leaf pick-up 165,000
Q Lake ChesOin 56,000
o Clerk to the Board 56,000
o Donations {Camp Dater
$10,000 & Quarterback
League $4,000) 14,000
Funding Sources:
o Ad~itlona! revenue from additional 1¢
real estate tax $ 835,000
o Reduce Insurance Reserve 750,000
o Capital Tmpr0v~nent$ 572,000
86-230
Reduce Capital Region Afrport Commission 4~000
Reduc~ Contingency 400,000
R~duoe Debt Reserve 410,800
From P~nd B~lance 590r000
TOTAL $3~561,800
considered last night hut that he felt the staff should betin at
thi~ point to begin a plan for a 2 y~ar budget so that all can
see where we stand financially for next year. ~e ~tat~d that the
County Administrator has indicated that if the ~osrd did not
raise taxes this year, it could he a $1.1i or $1.12 next year.
H~ stated no one wants a tax increase hut everyone knew when we
went with the bond referendu~ for the capital program that taxes
would have to be increased between 7-11¢. He stated the quality
of life has b%en established.
~rs. Girone inquired what would he cut ~he~ld the $~00,000 not
funded for the schools. ~. F~/~sey stated the staff has not had
a chance to talk with th¢ School AdministratiOn regarding thi~
hut he felt they would have to go back to the school Board to
decide what the cuts would
5irs. Girone stated that she did not know if the $1.03 or the
$1.05 was rlqht but she knows that the 95¢, which was what she
wanted origlnally, is not sufficient. She stated that wo~id mea~
the schools, the police, the ~rsing ho~=~ thu social services,
libraries, Camp Raker, et~. would not be funded to the lev~I at
which they are accustomed, she stated the fault is with the
with the school age children a~d the "needs" and "wants" that
~tated she does not have a problem wit5 attrlbut~nq the increase
to where it belonqs which she f~lt i~ the Single family homes as
they are the ones who are spending the money. She stated she
could support $1.04. She stated that as to the utilit~ tax, she
lives n=ar fha City and the people are v~ry enh~ppy with it.
~r. Daniel stated he felt the problem with the utility tax is
implementing it, because it has not been presented tc the public
and there is no way that it can be included for this year's
hu~get. Ee stated it ~ not that he could not support it but
etc., and that opportunity im not available. Re stated
~he opportunity to discuss this matter.
Mr. Mamas stated the ~ajority cf the School budget is teachers'
salaries and the legislature imposed tha~ upon the Board without
somewhere and the increase in enrollment and facilities ~s a
family ~eSponsibility. Hu stated the children gclng to school is
what testa and therefore the parents should pay for it which
basically what th~ Beard i~ doing, di~t=ibuting the cost wh~re if
belongs.
give the teachers an increase of 10% in ~alaries this year and
and three ne~t year, there are anticipated 1,!00 ~ew students
more kids than the !,100 anticipated and be faced with a request
the past several years in the fall and there will be no money
86-231
$t.03 and if that happens, the budgets of the County departments
will have to be cut and bear the brunt for the additional
students that have not been planned for.
Mr. Applegate seated that he felt the Board is conside=ing
reinstating the $40,000 for %he ~ichI~ond Syraphcny and
relates hack to his concern for "wa~t$" and "needs". Ha stated
he realizes this is a small figure but it is a "want" and no% a
"nee~" when there are real need~ in ~{ental Health/Mental
Retardation Services who requested $300,000 in critical needs,
needs that have not beep addressed. He stated the b~dg~ as
proposed makes donations An the ~/nount o~ $1,224,000 and does not
address the "n~eds". ~e stated that the School budget for
mandates i~ only ~8,100,000 and their budget totals $16,000,000.
He reviswed other items such a~ 10% Salary increase to
instructional psrsonnel, 8% salary increase to all other
employe~s, a ~un~er school deficit of $100,000, o~ertlme in
su~er emplo~nt in maintenanc~ transportation
additional buses ~nd drivers, etc. ~e stated i~ i$ not the stat,
man,ares that are eau~in~ ~he problem a~ that only i~ 50% but
are asking the general side of the County gover~n= ~o tighten
up bo= y~t we are giving ~he money away and are not addressing
the needs.
Mr. Mayen indicated he ~1~o f~lt the ~oard was n~t facing its
responsibility in dealing with Mental ~ealth/Mental
Servio~$. Mx. Daniel called for the question.
On motion of ~. Daniel, seconded by Mr. ~ye~, it is hereby
resolved that the 1986-87 Budget be adopted as follows*
~neral Fund $156,~21,800
School fund 141,442,700
Revenue Sharing 308,000
Vehicle and Co~unication~ Maintenance 2,565,900
N~r~ing ~ome 4,512,50~
Utilitie~ 37,159,600
Less Int~rfund Transfers [78,~79,500)
TOTAL
It i~ noted that th~ County Administrator's Propos~ Budget
amended as follows.
Add Expenditures:
o Roads $ 5~0,000
s Schools 2,300,000
o ~olice ~0O,000
O School Guards 23,800
o Libraries 68~000
O Leaf pick-up
~ Lake Chesdin 50,000
o Donations {Camp Baker
$10,000 & Quarterback
League ~4t000) 14,000
TOTAL
F~nding So,roes:
o kdditional revenue Erom additional 1¢
real estate tax $ 835,000
86-232
c Capital Improvements 572f0~
o Reduce Capital Region Airport Commission 4,000
TOTAL
Mrs. Girone - Aye
Mr. Applegate - Nay
Mr. Applegate clarified h~s vote stating that he supported the
he did net feel the board ha~ addressed the "ne~d~" and h~
ll.B. ADOPTION OF TAX RATES FOR
on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by ~r, ~ayes, the Beard adopt~¢
the followin~ o~dinanC~:
AN ORDINA~CE TO ESTABLISH THE ANNUAL TAX L~VY
~e I~ Ordained by the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Chesterfield that fo~ the ~ear beginning on the firs~ day of
January, 1986, and ending on ~he thirty-first day of De~ember,
1986, the taxes on proper~y in all th~ Kagisterial Districts cf
the County of Chesterfield shall be us follows:
Sec. 1. Real Pro~ert~ and Mobile Homes.
value thereof.
Sec, 2, Personal ProFert¥.
(a) On automobiles, trailers, boats, boat trailers, other
motor vehicles and on all tangible p~rsonal property use~ or hel~
in connection with any mining, manufacturing or other business,
trade, occupation or profession, including furnishings, furniture
and appliances in rental units, the tax shall be $5.60 on every
$100 of the assessed value thereof.
{b) On a~rcraft as defined by ~58-829.5 of the Code of
~irqinia, ~950, as amended, the tax ~hall be $1,I00n'-~r~ $100
of the assessed value theroo~.
Sec. 3. Public Service Corporation P~opert~.
(a) On that portion of r~al estate and tangible personal :
property o~ public service eorpora~ion~ which has been egualiz~d~
aS p~ovided in Section 5S-512.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, a~
amended, th8 tax shall b~ $1.04 on every $100 of the assessed
{b) On that portion of the real estate and tangible per-
serial property of public service corporations which has not beeni
=qualize~ ~$ provided iB section 5~-512,1 of the Cod~ of V~r-
linla, 195~, as amended, the tax shall be $3.20 on every $100 of
assessed value ~hereef determined by tho State Corporation
Con~uiusion.
)
I¢) The foregoing subsections to the contrary notwith-
standing, on automobiles and truck~ ~eloogi~g to such public
service corporations the tax shall be $3.60 on every $500 of
assessed value thereof.
Sec. 4. Machinmr~ and Tools.
On machinery and %eels used in a manufacturing or mining
business the tax shall be $1.00 on every $100 assessed val~e
thereof.
The Board being polled:
Mr. MaTes - Aye
Mr. Daniel -
Mrs. Girone - Aye
Mr. Appleg~te - Nay
Mr. Dcdd - Nay
~r. Applegate clarified his vote by stating that the tax rate
supported a budget for which he voted against.
Mr. Rams~y reminds4 the Bosrd that prior ~o any of the money
being spent~ the Board would have to vote on an appropriations
rs~elu%ion which wou!d be presented in the upcoming months. The
work compiled during this process.
It was generally agreed the Board would recess for five
Reconvening~
9.B. ROUTE 36 ~RAD~ SE~AP~TIO~ ~ROJ~CT
~r. Dod~ disclosed to the Board that he owns property in the ares
of the Route 36 Grade Separation~ declared a conflict of
pursuant to the Virgiaia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act
and excused himself from the meeting,
· F~. Mayas stated the Board has been dealing with this issue uinc~
February, !984; this Board pledged to complete the project; it
pledged to fund that project and the money was identified in
accordance with the Highway Department's estimate. He stated
sinc~ that tim~ things have taken place which have prevented it
~rcm prouee~ing ~orwar~. 5e stated ~ preDare~ a resolution for
the Board and since all have not had an opportunity to review and
comment on it, s~ggested a deferral.
On motion cf Mr. Mayer, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
deferred consideration of the Route 36 Grade Separation project
until April 23, 1986 in orde~ to allow the Board time to respond
Ayes: Mr. F~yes, Mr. Applegate, ~Lr. Daniel and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Dodd,
Mr. Meye~ stated he would also be appealinq to the elected
officials and the citizens who will have to pay for it for some
assistance. Mr. Hedrick reemghasized that the Highway Departmen-
ts delaying the project until the Board makes a determination.
~[r. Dodd returned to the m~tlng.
~I.C. CO~dUNIT¥ DEV~LOP~NT IT,S
I1.C.1. MAINTENANC~ OF S~NATE
Om motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
appropriated $~,060 from the Bermuda District ~¢ Road Funds for
86-234
Vote: Unanimous
11.C.2. STERM~AT~R MANAGEMENT SYSTRM FOK SOUTNPARK
On motion of Mr. Appl~g~te~ ~econded by Mrs. Girome, thB Board
approved an~ anthorized the County Administrator to execute a
Storm Water ~aintenance Agreemen~ with the developer of southpar~
as approved by the County Attorney.
ll.g.3. S~OP44 WATt, MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PER JOHNSTON ~ILLIS CEN~E~
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mrs. Girono, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute a
storm water maintenanc~ aqreement with the developer of Johnston
Willis Center as approved by the County Attorney's office.
11.C.4. ADDITIONAL E~GZNEERINQ WORK FOR WHITEPINE ROAD E~TENSIO5
On ~otio~ of Mr. Daniel, seconded b~ ~lr$. ~iron~ the Board:
t. Appropriated an additional $12,137 from the Airport
Industrial ~sserve Account for additional services in
designing Whitepine Road Extension, Phase III.
Authorized a change order to Austin Brockembreugh &
A~seciates in the amount of $t2,137 for additional
enqineerinq,
Mr. Dodd rec£~ested that ~t~ff review the price of new property
at the Industrial Park as he felt it might be selling under
market value.
11.C.5. 1986-87 PRIMARY PREALLOCATION HEARING
~£. Medsick presented th~ Board with a proposed 1986-87 Primary
Praallocation hearing statement to be presented at the Highway
Department on April 3, 1986. Mr. Dodd stated he and ~lr. Daniel
would ~e eat of the County during that time, requested the Hoard
members attend and requested Mrs. Girone present the Board's
statement. ~. Daniel rec/uastsd that the deleqatas be invited
a~tand by formal communications. ~e inquired if the llst of roa~
projects which are outlined were ~omplatad, what would the cost
be. Mr. EcCracken stated it WaD estimated at $250,000,000
exoluding Powhite and Route 288. Mrs. Girone suggested two
changes to be included in th~ statement. It was generally agree~'
the statement was acceptable as amended.
Mr. MoCracken stated that the Governor's Commission On the 21st
Century will be ~eetin~ oD April I, 1986 ~t the Richmond
District. ~e stated if tha~ sa~e priority list is acceptable,
that could be presented in statement form. Mr. Dodd requested
that M~. Applegate present the Board's ~tat¢~ant ut this
I'
On motion of ~r. Dodd, seconded by Mr. ~ayes, the Hoard appointa~
Ms. Jean Copeland to the ~ohn Tyler Community College Local Boar~
whose term is effective £mmadiata!~ and will e~pi~e in June,
1988.
86-235
ll.E. CONSENT IT~
iI~E.1. ~TAT~ ROAD ACCEPTANCE
This day the County ~nvironmentat ~ngineer~ in accordance with
direction~ f~om this Board, made report in writing upon his
~xamination of KelthwQod Parkway and KeithwOed Court in
Keithwood, Clov~r Hill Distrlc~
Upon consideration whereof, and On me,ion of ~. Applegate,
sacond~ hy Mr. Daniel, it is resolved that Keithwood Parkway an~
~eithwood Court in Kelthwood, Clov~r Hi11 District, be and they
hereby are established as public roads.
A~d be it furthur resolv=d~ that the Virginia Department of
~ighways and Transportation, be and it hereby
is requested to taka into the Secondary System, Keithwood
Parkway, beginning where State ~a~ntanance ends, Keithwood
Parkway, State Route 1792, and going 0.01 mile northeasterly to
the intersection with Keithwoed Court, then continuing 0.17 mile
northeasterly to a temporary turnaround; and Ks±thwood Court,
beginning at the intersection with Keithwood Parkway and going
0.14 mite northwesterly to a cul-de-sac.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, site distance
and ~esigna=ed Virginia Department of Highways drainage
These road~ ~erve 3~ lot~.
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Highways a 66'
right-of-way for KeithwDod Parkway and a 5o~ right-of-way ~or
Kuithwood Court.
Keithwood is rccordud us follows:
Plat Book 38, Page 58, April 17, 1981.
Vote: Unani~us
11.~.2. R~QuEST$ FOR DtN~O/F4~PLE
On motion of Mr. ADplegate, seconded by Mr. Da~ial, ~he Board
approved the requests for bingo and/or ra~Ie permit~ for the
following organizations fo~ calend~r y~a~ 1986:
~on Air Rc~ary Club
Greenfield Elementary S~hool P.T.A.
Virginia Stat~ University Athletic Booster Club
Vot~: Unanimous
ll.F. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ITEMS
ll.F.I. PUBLIC EEARING TO VACATE EASEMENT IN EXBURY, SECTION 1
Mr. Welchonm staeed this dace and tlm~ had been a~ver~ised for a
public hearing to consider the vacation of a 16 ft. drainage
easement ~ithin ~xbury, Section 1. Thcr~ was ~o one presen~ to
dimc~ms the matter.
On motion of Mr. Apple~ate~ seconded by ~r. Daniel, the Board
adopted th~ following ordinance:
~ @~Di~A/~CE to vacate a portlou ola 16 foot ~rainnq~
easement adjacent to Lots 33 and 34, ~lock Ar E×bury,
Section I, Clover Hill ~agisterial District, Chester£ield
County, Virginia~ as shown on a plat thereof duly recorded
~6-236
in the Clerk's office cf the Circuit Court of Chesterfield
County in Plat Book 51, at page 72.
W~REAS, Wineton Development Company ha~ petitioned the
soard of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia to vacate
portion Of a 16 foot drainage easement adjacent tc Lots 33~34
Block A~ Er~b~y~ Section 1, Clover gill N~qisterial District,
Chesterfield County, virginia more particularly shown sn a plat
of record in the Clerk's Offic~ of the Circuit Court of said
County in Plat BOoR 5I, page 72, made by J. K. Tint, one and
Associates, Incorporated, da=ed 0etcher lQ, 19~5. The drainage
follows~
A 16 ~eot drainage easement adjacent to Lets 33 and 34~
fully shown, shaded in red on a pint made by J, K. Tigons
and Associate~, Incorporated, dated January 7, 1986, a copy
of which iS at~ached hereto and made a part of this
of ~he Code of virginia, 1950, a~ amendeS, by advertising; and
accordanc~ witk ~ection 15.1-482(b) uf =he Code of V~rqinia,
1950~ as amended~ and a certified copy 0f t~is Ordinance,
together with the plat attached h~reto shall be recorded
Circuit Court of Chesterfield, Virginia pursuant to Section
TA~ effect of this Ord~nanc~ pursuant to Section 15.1-483
=o destroy the foroe an~ effect of the ~ecordinq o9 the ~rtion
of the plat v~c~ted. Thi~ ordinance shall vest fee ~impl~
Development Company free and clear of any rlgh~s of ~lic use.
li.F.2. SEWER ITEMS
ll.F.2.b. CONDEMNATION OF SEWER EASEMENT FOR PRIfND AV~Uf
On ~otiOn of ~. Dodd, seconded by Mr, Danipl, the
authorized the County Attorney to institute condemnation
proceedings against the following property owners if the amount
a~ set opposite their names is not accepted. And be it further
resolve~ that the County Administrator notify ~aid property
owners by regimented mail on M~ch 27, 1986 of the County's
intention to enter upon and take the property which is to b~ the
subject of said condenmation proceedings. Thi~ action i~ on an
emergency basis and the County intends to exercis~ immediate
right of entry pursuant to section 15.1-238,1 cf the Code of
Virginia.
Robert A. Reynolds and Dennis H. Walters
86-~37
Friend Aveeue
Vote: Unanimous
ll.F.3.a. WATEr CO~T~ACT FOR FA%RPI~/~S, SECTION 5
On motion of ~r. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Appleqater the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator ko e~eoute any
necessary dccument~ for the following water contract:
Total Contract Cost:
Estimated County Cost:
~stima=ed Developer Cos=:
Number of Connections: 38
code: 5E-2511-997
$46,775.00
12,328.54
$34,44~.46
(Cash Refund & ~efund
through connection
And further the soard appropriated $7,~00.00 from 5D surplus to
ll.F.3.b. SEWER CONTRACT FOR WQUDLAKE TRUNK S~WER~ PHASE I
O~ ~otion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Bourd
approved and authorized :he County A~ministrator to eKecute any
neceSSary documents for the following Sewer contract:
Sewer Contract Number S86-35CD/7 (8}635M; Woodlak~ Trunk
Sewer, Phase III
Developer: Investors Woodlake D~velopment Corporation
Cuatractor: RMC Contractors, I~eorporate~
Total Contract COSt: $173,029.00
Total Estimated County Cost: I7~002.$4 (Refun~ through
Connection Fees)
Estimated Developer Cost: $156,026.65
W~mber of Connections: 8
Code~ 5N-2511-997
Vote: Unanim0u~
~I.F.3.¢. CONTR~CT POE UPGRADING ROCKW00~ PUMPING 8TAT%0N
On motion of ~r. Daniel, seconded by ~r. Applegate, the soard
approved a~d ~thorized ~he C0unt~ Administrator to e×~cute any
necessary documents for Contract W~6-12R, installation of an
additional pkl~p in tke Rockwocd Water Pumping Station to WACO~
IncerDorat~d ~aaed on their low b~d in the amount n~
$99,849.00 and further the Board transferred $110,0~O.00 from
5H-58~5-59~R te 5H-~3~-~12R, which is being done fO~ accounting
p~rposes. It iS noted that funding of this project was included
in the $1,SDO,0O0.00 approved in the 1985-86 Capital Improvement
Program.
BAILEY'S BRIDGE PUMPING STATION t~PROVEM~NTS~ SS5-97C
O~ motion Of Mr, Daniel~ seconded by ~r. Applegatc~ the Board
approved and authorlz~d the County A~ministrator to e~ecute any
necessary documcnt~ for Nhitman~ Req~ardt and A~sociatcs to
perform engineering services on the Bailey's Bridge Pumping
Station Improvements, S85-97C and further th~ Board authorized
5P-~lT-597R. ~t is noted that funding fo~ this project in
the amount of $40~000 is included in the existing Capital
Improvement Budget,
ll.F.3.e. DRAINAGE EASEMENT IN PROPOSED C~I~CN~$~ SUBDIVISION
approved and authorized the Chairman of the Board and the County
Administrator to execute a quit claim 4eed to VaCate a portion of
a 16~ drainage easement within proposed Chipchas~ ~ubdlvlsion.
i1.F.4. REPORTS
Mr. W~lchons prese~ed ~he Board wi~k a list of developer water
and sewer oontracte e×eeutad by the Counby Administrator.
Hedrick ~rmsented the Board with a etatne report on the
General Fund Contingency, the General Fund Balance, the
and Street Light Fnnd~ and t~e Road P~serve Funds.
%l.L. EXECUTIVE
On motion of Mr. bahia1, s~¢on~ed by ~r, Apple~ate, the ~oard
went into Executive session to discuss with counsel legal
regarding HMK vs. Walsey as permitte~ ~y Section
of the Code of Virginia, 1950, a~ ~ended.
Vote: Unanimou~
11.~. INTERVIEW WITH ~ODEL COUNTY GO%~ERNMENT STUDENTS
The Board met i~formally witm ~4od~t County ~oVeXDI~ent Pay
Mr. Daniel excused n~self from tau m~uting.
1i. I. L~C~
The Board recessed for lunch at the Albert Crosswind Rent,rant.
ReCO~veni~g:
~. Dodd stated that Mrs, Giron~ would be cz~airing the zoning
mesmlon this afternoon wnlcn is in accordance with rules and
procedures of the B~ard.
ll.J. P~QU~STS FOR MOBILE HOME PERMITS
85g172
In ~ermuda Maqisteria! District, Carl D. Adenauer requested a
Mobile Ho~e Pef~it to park a mobile nome on property fronting the
west line of Jefferson Davis aignway, approximately 600 feet
south of Forest Lake Road, end better known as 13900 Jefferson
8G-239
Davis Highway. Tax Map 133-7 (2) Mid City Farms, ~lock A, LOt 12
that an 8tn condition b~ ad~pd which i~ agreeable to the
applicazlt wnic~ addresses tn~ ~ubdivision o~ the proper~y
requests. ~. Adenauer was presen~ and ~a~d ~ney nave
the request fe~ a mobile nome per. it for a period
subject to tho following conditions:
Board approved
of five years
i. Tz~e applicant snell be the owner and occupant of the mobile
property. Only one (I) mobil~ ~o~e snell ~e permitted to be
parked on an individual lot or parcel.
and o=ner zoning requirements of the applicabl~ zoning
district ~nall be eo~pli=d witn~ except rna% no mobile
snell be located closer t~an 20 f~et tu a~y
r%sidenc~.
4. No additional permanent-type living spac~ may b~ added
a mobile nome. All mobile n~s or,all be skirted but snell
not be placed on a ps.anent foundation.
5. W~=e~e public (COunty) water and/or mower are avail~te,
6. Upon being granted a Mobile Home Pe~it, the applicant snail
tn~n obtain the necessary pe~i~ item the 0friGo of tne
Building Official. Tnim shall be d~ne prior to
installation or ~elo=ation of the ~bil~
7. ~y violation of ~e above conditions s~mtI be grounds fo~
revocation of the Mobile HOmo Pe~mit.
A deed and ~I~t ~bdividin~ tni~ ~opurty will ~e recorded
within seven (7) days of ~ne date 0f this
~sent: ~. Daniel.
S6S060
In Bermuda Magisterial District, Henry Adenauer requested a Mobil
Home Permit to park a mobile nome on property fronting %ne we~t
line of Jefferson Davis Eignway~ appzoxi~ately 68~ ~eet south of
Forss~ Lake Road, an~ be~ter known as 13900 Jeffersun Davi~
~ignway. Tax Map 133-7 (2~ ~4id City Farms, Block A, Park Of Lot
12 (Sheet 41).
Mr. Adenauer was present. There was no opposition present. On
motion of Mr. Dodd~ ~¢ond~d by Mr. M~yus~ the Doard approved
this roqu6s~ s~bjec% to tn0 following o0nditions.'
1. The applicant snell be the ~wn~r and o~cupan~ of the mobile
No lot or parcel may be rented or leased for us~ as a mobfle
nome site, nor snell any mobile nome be used for rental
property. Only one (1) mobile nome s~aI1 be permitted to be
parked ca an indlvi~ual lot or parcel.
d~strict ~nall b~ co~li~d wispA, except t*~ut no mobile
snell b~ located closer tnaD 20 feet to any existi~
4. No additional permanent-type living ~Faee ~y be added onto
a mobile nome. All ~bile names sz~all be skirted but shall
5. Wner~ public (County) water and/or ~ewer are available,
6. Upon being granted a Mobile Home Permit~ the applicant snell
r~voc~tion of tr~e Mobile Hone Pe~it.
8. A deed an0 plat subdividinq t~is property will be fUCord=d
wire,in sev~n (7) days of t~e date of =~is
9. ~rior ~o occupancy of ~:~e s~ect mobile nome, ~ne
Department snalI approve, and tt~u applicant ~nall install,
wlt~in sixty (60) days or prior to occupancy of the
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, ~r. AppleqaLte, Mrs. G~ron~ and Mr. Mayes.
~sent ~ Mr. Daniel.
REQUESTS FOR REZOHING
~5S155
Ia Clover Eill Magistsrial District, RICHAgD =. COLLIER requested
rezoning from AgEieulfu~al (A) and Rauidential (R-15) to Office
Business (O) with a conditional U~e Planned Devglopmen= to permit
bulk (setback) exceptions on a 4.24 acre parcel fronting
approximately 460 f~t on t~,~ suutn llne o~ Hull Street Road,
also frontinq approxi~t~ly 425 fee% on %ne west line of ~ndolpn
Lyncnester Road. The parce] i~ located between the intersection
o~ tnes~ roa~s. Tax Ma9 50-5 (1) P~rc~ls 3, 4, and 5 and {4)
14) .
Mr. Peele stated that %ne Planning Co~ission nad reco~nded
approval of rezoning to Office Businems (0) with a Conditio~al Us
Planned Develo~ent for the pa~tels fronting Route 360 and
Randolph Road and that the parcel fronting ~ndolpn Road
exclusively r~ain zoned R-15, but be incorporated into the
Condi%ionaI USe Planed Dew=lopmen~ and remain as a buffsr all of
deferrmd tnim at last month's m~e=ing to allow the applicant time
and distributed an addendum in line with those discussions.
~r. ~ruoe ~ulcner was present representing the applicant. He
Co~issi0n with the addition[ of fo~r changes dealing primarily
wit~ installation of p~lic sew~r. E~ stated there w~re language
$8-24~
clarifications which ne would like maria fox conditions #5 and
%1I. ~ ntated %1 on the addendum was acceptable. ~Lr. Applegat~
agreed %o additional verbiage in proposed Condition
~r. C. B. C~tdwe%l, a~ adjacent property o~er, stated if Lot 6 I
obj~ot~on to a m~d~ai facility wit~ reqard to ~ngre~ and
~le discussion re~ardlng t~ e traffic flow in the area and now
could aff~ tni~ road an~ its access. ~r. Ap~l~gate s~at~d ne J
development and would no~ permit a s~gnificant portion ~o be
medical.
approved r~zouing to Office susiness (O) wlt~ a Conditional Use
Randolph Road (T~ Map 50=5 (t) Parcels 3, 4 and 5 and (4)
parcel fronting Lyncnestar Drive e~cl~ively {Tax Map 50-5 {4)
R-15, b~t that =n~ Conditional Use Pieced Development also
t~e followinq conditions:
9srimeter of all driveways and parking ar~as. Drainage
traffic.
3. Tnu arcnlt=ctural style and quality of buildings shall be
(2) stories. T~e soutz~ern building walls snail incorpora=e
addition~, s;~ed roofs, etc.). Building faoadas adjacent to
offioes, Meo]~anical e~ipment s]~all not be visible from
Kou=e ~0 or lots in Falling Creek Farms. aenderings de-
Planning Co~ission for apDroval in eonjun=tlon with
schematic plan review. (CPC)
interior landscapin~ per parking space. EaCh re,ired
land~caped area shall contain a minimum of one nuDdred (100)
square feet and s[~all nave a minimum dimension of at lea~t
t~ {1~) f~t. Tn~ primary landscaping material used in
capable of providing sz~ade a~ maturity. Eac~
trunk of at leas~ five (5} feet. T~e total nu~er of trees
fraction thereof, of required interior landscaped area. The
vsgeta=ive material to complement the ~ree landscaping.
86-242
Time area desiynated as required setbacks snail not b8
calculated a~ required landscaped area.
within tne fifty (50) ~oot setback along Bull street Road
and the fifteen (15) foot setback areas along ~ndolpn Road
and Lyncnestmr Drive, landscaping snell be
One (1) tree sz~all be planted for ~ao~, fif=y (~O) linear
A conceptual landscaping plan depicting tn~se reqnire~n%s
(30) day~ of rougn clearing and grading, the
Department snell be contacted to inspect the setback areas.
If remaining vegetation is not ~nfficient to co~ly wit~
tni~ cOndieion~ a detailed landscaping plan shall be
s~mittsd ~0 the Planning Depar~ent for approval within
thirty (30) days of the inspection.
A fifty (50) foot buffsr snell b~ ~intained adjacent to Lot
5, Block D, of Falling Creak Fa~s, Section A on Ta~
50-5; a thirty-five (35} fooe buffer ~n=ll be maintained
adjacen= to =ne "well lot" in Ealling Creek Farms, Section A
Section C snell remain Boned R-15 and inoorporat~ into the
Conditional Use Plannsd Developmen~ as a buffer. Otn~r
fenced, or a co~i~atio~ of tn~ three {3) to screen
development from view of adjac=nt single family
develop~nt to t~a south. At u minim~, a ~en (10] foot
wide berm, landscaped wi=n wni~e pines, having an i~i~'fal
n%ig~t of six (6) feet ~nd placed on five (5) foot
enall be installed alen~ the sOUthern boundary adjacent to
Lot ~, Block D of Falling Creek Farms, Sect~'~n A On 'Tax Map
50-5. A conceptual landscaping plan enall be e~bmi%t~ to
the Pla~i~g Co~iz~io~ fo~ appkoval in conjunction with
scn~atic plan review. AS mUen mKis~ing vegetation
possible ~z~all be maintained wi%nin tnim buffer. Prior
any clearing or grading, the buffer snail be flagged and tne
Planning Department ccntacte~ to in~pe=t ~nese areas.
Within thirty (38) days o~ rough clearin~ and grading,
ning Depar~nt for approval. Tz~is buffer may ba installed
ia conjunction wi~n tne phasing of tn~ d~velopmen~.
All exterior lighting snell be concealed source lighting,
not to exceed a :~eignt of fifteen (15} feat, and positioned
so as not to illuminate adjacent propur=ieu. Only lighting
required for uucurity purpos~ snell be allowed after
Iigntin~ plan unall bu submitted %o %ne Planning Staff for
Except ~or temporary real estate and construction aign~, one
(1) freestanding sign visible tO Route 360 snell be
pe~itted. This sign snell not exceed an aggregate a~ea of
fifty (58) s~are f~et aud a ~.~ignt o~ ten (lO} feet. This
sign may be externally ill~inaced, but ~y 0nly be
internally illuminate~ i~ ~ne siqnfield is opaque
translucent letter~ or sy~ols. The architectural style
this sign snatl blend with that of tn~ structures t0
erected on rna parcel. Other 9rees~ding sign~, for
directional and id~tificati0n poseurs, may be
not permit visibility from Fei!lag Creek Fa~s subdivision.
All 0tne~ ~ign~ ~naI1 be o9 rcgulat=d by the Zoning
Ordinance for Office ~usiness (o) Districts, exuep~
signu may b~ ~xternally ill~inated~ but may only be
internally illuminated if =n~ signfi~ld is opaque
translucent le%%er~ or s~ols. Prior to erection of an~
signs, a sign package Shall be submittad to tn~ Planning
Department for approval.
g. Prior to the release of a building permit, tnirty {30) feet
of rigz~t of way, ~a~ured from ~ne centerlin~ of ~ndolpn
Road and Lyncnas%er Drive, ~all be dedica:ed ~o and for
County of Cl~esterfiel~ frae and unrestricted. (~)
9. A~dit~onal pavement an~ cuxb and ~tter shall b~
along ~ute 56~, Randolph Road, an~ Lyncne~ter Drive, as
deemed necessary bI ~&T and t~e Transportation
standards.
The developer shall in, tall dry s~r~ in accord~ee with
t~e Utilities Depar~ent'$ d~$ign standards. At mUCh time
t~t p~%io sewer is located within 500 f~t of the property
p~lic s~wer lines at his ~xpen~.
exception the fifty (50} fo~h setback requirement along Route
In Dermuda Magis%erlat District, RAYMOND O. J~KINS requested
razoning from Co--unity Busine~ (B-2) to General Business (B-3)
on a 0.3? acre parcel fronting approximately 80 feet on the
line of Jefferson D~vis Hiqnway, ~lSO f~Qnting approximately
feet on ~lokomin Avenue approxi~teiy 450 feet north of
Wonderview Drive. Tax Map ~2-~3 (4) ~alfway ~ouse ~eignts, Block
1, Lots 1, 2, and 22 {Sn~et
~r. Pool~ staeed the Planning Co~i~ion nad reco~ended
of the request ~ubjee% fo =ertain conditions. ~e ad4~d
applicant nad called and could not be present at the ~etlng.
Mr. Dodd stated tni~ i~ ~ ~ttemp~ to ~prov~ the a~pearan~e on
Jefferson Davis Highway and th~ applicant nas s~mitted a letter
this request ~ubject to the following condition:
A thirty (38) foot b~ffer shall be ~intai~ed along
board f~nCe having a minimum neig~t o~ six (6) feet, shall
be installed within tnls buffer. Other t~a~ ~tilitiez which
cross the buffer generally p~rpendicularly, u~ere sz~all
no facilities located in tni$ buffer. In conjunction with
final site plan review, a detailed landscaping/femclng plan
depictin~ tni~ require~nt snail be ~ubmitt~d to the Plan-
ning Depar~ent for approval.
conditions:
1. We are installing ~oden slats in the existing fence
and plating shrubs in front, to imgrove the appearance
of the property.
2. There s~atl be no outdoor advertising $i9~$ located
§6-244
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Fir. Applegate, Mrs. Giron~ and Mr.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
86,5002
In Clover Hill ~agisterial District, ~ C@P~ORAT~O~ r~goested
Conditional Use Planned Development to permit bulk (setbacks for
perking, gas pump canopy, and sign) except£o~u in a General
Busine~ (B=3) District on a 1.Q acre parcel fronting
approxi~t~ly 210 f~et on ~n~ sout~ llnu of ~idlotnian Turnpike,
stated tn% conditions were acceptabl~ e~cept for condition %5.
~e in~roduoed other officials/representatives of E~on
~lfe stated they would accept condition %3 re~iring right of
by ~xxon Co, any, U.S.A., ~ated 1/15/S6, s~all be considered
perimeter of all driveways and parking areas. Drainage
3. ~rior to t~e lelease ufa building pe~it, thirty-five
C~estmrfield, free and unre~trlcted.
pike/Nor~r~ ~cn Road intersection, (T and
time of final site plan review.)
g~anted. In addition, a twenty-two (22) foot
along Midlotnlan Turnpike shall be grated.
86-245
Landscaping sz~all be located in a manner wniuz~ does not
obstruct sight distance. D~tai~ed plans depicting this
requirement snell be submitted ko trLe Planning Departmsnt
for approval in conjunction wit£~ final site plan review.
(P)
In conjun~tio~ with the approval oi this request,
Planning Cormmission shall grant ~cnematic plan approval
tz~e Master Plan, subject to the conditions herein.
Ayes: ~ir. Dodd, Mr. Applegat~, Mrs. Giro~e and F~.
Absent: ~r. Daniel.
86S006
In Clover ~ill Magisterial District, A~AC-VIRGINIA, INC.
requested a~endmen~ to a previously granted Conditional USe (Case
80S044) to p~smit expansion of processing plant and ~tockpile
area in an Agricult~at (A) District on a 15.7 ~cr~ parcel lying
approximately 750 feet off ~ne west line o~ Warbro Road~
~rom a point approximately 3~150 feet north of ~ull ~re~
Subject %o c~rtain Conditions. Mr. Pnillp Rome was present
inquired if this would suggest t~at tner~ could be additional
blasting. ~. Peele stated that was not ~ne ~ase a~ co~ditio~
an~ 5 restrict tn~ blazting ~re $o than currently uxistu.
On motion of Mr. Appleqat~, ~econded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
1. T~e following co~dition~ nQtwltnstanding, tn~ plan
by J.K. Ti~ons and Associate~, r~vised February 3, 19S6,
snell b~ considered tn~ ~t~r Plan.
2. A 1~0 ioof buffer snell bm maintain~ ~etw~n tn~ Virginia
Power eas~ent and the western limits ui tn~ area to
cleared %o acco~da=e =~e s~ockDile a~ea and construction
of the sewer line, Aluo~ tz~u urea west Of tn~ Virginia
P~er easement s~all b~ main=ai~ed as a buffer. A ~eventy
{70) foot buffer snal! be maintained along the northwestern
maintained in %n~ir natural state and supplemented, w~ere
n~uessary, to ad~guately screen the area from adjaoen%
property or Proposed Route 288, U~ilitie~ and drainage
a buffer, but may be cleared and graded upon s~m~ssion
of the plans, if it is determined tna~ ]andmeaplng i~
propertie~, planting sna!l be required. (P)
Prior to any clearing or ~/adlng, an erosion control plan
ul~all be submitted to und approved by ~nviro~ntal
saturdays or Sunday~.
powder o~ less.
86-246
(Note: ~xcept where stated herein, all eonditlon~ of Condl-
tionaI Use 80~044 remain appllo~ble.)
Ayes~ Mr, Dodd, Mr. ~ppleg~e, Mrs. Qirone and Mr. ~ayes.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
Mr. Applegate disclosed to tz~e Board that ni~ company is involved
in the sale of the property in t~e next cas~, d~ctared a eo~flic~
of interest Dursuant %o the virginia Comprehensive Conflict
Tntmrmst Act and e~cu~ed himself from tn~ ~e~ing.
requested re~oning from ~sidential To~nnou~ (R~TH) ~0
Industrial (~-1) with Conditional U~ Planned D~v~lop~nt to
permit u~ and bulk exceptions on a 25.0 acr~ p~rcel lying
approxima=ely 800 fee~ off ~ne nor~n line of Midlotnian Turnpike,
opposite Otturdale Road. Tax Map 15 (1] Part of Parcel 2
7).
~r. Peele stated the Planning Co~ission nad r=co~e~ded
of the request subject to certain conditions. ~. J~ff
agreement with the conditions except for Condlticn ~8 as
residential properties. ~+ Peele ~xplalned the ~taff's
reasoning for tnm reco~n~ation of the b~ffer oondi=ion, mention
the outside storage, and tz~e ~illty to cnang~ ~n~ b~ff~r w~d~n
durin~ ~cnemati~ plan. There wa~ no opposition present,
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr~ Ma~e$~ t~e Board approved
understanding that durinq ~cne~tic plan review~ t~e 50
b~ffer will ~ allowed and r~view~d closely for proper
landscaping:
1. The following conditions no~wit~standinq, tn~ plan
by J.K. Tigons and Associat~, P.C., dated October 18,
1985, shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
In conjunction with ~onematic plan ~ubmiusion ~or each site,
the ~ev~lo~er/owner s~all submit the anticipated
fI~ calculations and the acc~ulative total flows r~lative
for approval. Schematic plan5 s~ll not be approved ~til
such time a~ the Utilitie~ Depart~nt nas reviewed and
sewer 0apaoity is li~ted and future use of t~e property may
Utilities DeDar~en%. A copy of ~ne duc~en= shall
to their recordation.
4. Driveway~ and parking areas shall be pave~. Concrete c~rb
driveways ~d Darking areas. Drainage s~alI be designed so
5. Tn~ nor%~j~o~tn collector road w~.icn aligns wi~n 0tterdale
This road shall nava a minimum t~ical s~ctlon of forty-
eight (49) feet, face of curb to face of curb. (T)
way of sixty (60) fee~. T~i$ road shall nave a minim~
86~247
typical sestion c~ forty (48) feet, face of curb to face of
curb.
7. 3% ~tub road, having a minimum rig~t of way of sixty
fe~t~ s~all be a~t~nd~d %0 tn~ western proper~y llne. T~is
ti~e of sene~tic plan review. (T~
A fifty (50) foot buffer snell be maintained along the pe-
riphery of t~e subject property where adjacent to
residentially or agriculturally zoned property. NO
these buffers. Public roads and utilities ~y be
through these buCCers upon approval by the Plannln~
Co~issiOn at the t~e of $cn~mati¢ plan review. At
time o~ scz:amatic plan review for each individual lot, a
Planning Co~immio~ for approval. T[~is condition may be
modilied by the Planning Co~ission a~ ~&=e time of schematic
plan review if a~jaoent property z~as been zoned for a
lar use or if it is determined ~at ad,quake buffering can
be aooomplis~ed in a lesser widtz~. Detailed landmcaplng
approval witf~in ninety (9o) days of rough clearing and
grading. (~ ~
9. Approval of tne ~stmr ~tan do~s nc~ im~ly that t~,e County
gives final approval cf any particular road section. (P)
by ~ns Coup=y, o= ~eveloger, ~n~ica~e a n~ed.
by the developer (or nls assignee) at ~im (their) e~ense.
If t~ze C~unty agrees tc pay for mtrmet Iignting current~
County' m ~o~itment.
12. All parking areas of tf~irty (30) ~paces or mo~u snalt
contain appropriate landscaped area~, as deemed necessary by
t~,e Planning Co~ission during sc~ematic plan review. (P)
13. Uses snell be limited to theme pe~itted in the Ligz~t
Industrial (H~l) Dist=ict, plus t~e ~ollowing us~
tions:
All Convenience Business (B-l} uses
Carpenter and cabinet
Congractorm~ of f icom and display rooms
Electrical, p]~ing and/or n~a~ing
sales and service
Fraternal, pn~an=nro~ic, and cnari%~le
Health
Laboratories
Printing
Repair =e~iu~a, except of automobilem
SonooI~ - Co~ercial, t~ade~ music, d~ce,
business, vocational and training
Tool and equipment
Co~unica~ion stu~ios and stations (not
E~pomition building or c~nter, stadium, argna
veterinary nospital~ or clinics
14. In conjunction wit~ the approval of tnls request, a
twenty-five (25) foot exception %o the twenty-five (25)
86-248
interior side yard setback requirement snell be granted.
15.
Outside ~torege snell be permitted ~ubject to appreva! by
t~e ~Ianni~g cor~r~ission at ~,e time of schematic plan
review. (CPC)
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mrs. Giroae and ~Lr. Hayes.
Absent: Mr. Daniel and blt. Apptegate.
Mr. ~pplegate returned to t~e meeting.
86S015
In Clover ~ill ~agi~terial District, SHIV~LY ENTERPRISes, I~C.
requested a Conditional Uss Planned De~%lopm%nt to permit use
{contractors office ShOp, and storage yard) and bulk [paving)
excsp~iom~ in ~n Agricultural {A) District on a t. 0 acre parcel
fronting approximately 215 feet on tn~ east line of Warbro ~oad,
approximately 1,15~ ~eet ~outn of Geni%o Road. Tax ~p 48-3 (1)
Part Of ~aroel$ 4, $, and 6 (Snee~ 13).
~. Pool= ~ta~e~ t~e ~lanning Co~isslon nad reco~en~e~ approval
~ motion cf ~. Apple~ate, seconded by ~r. Dodd, ~n9
aD~rovsd tn~s r~quest ~jec% ~O %ne ~ollowing conditions :
1. Tnt folI~ing conditions notwithstanding, %ne plan
by Pott~ and Minter, da~ed Nuv~er 13, 1985, s~all be
considered tnt ~ster Plan.
2. A thirty (30) foot buffer snalI be maintained along Warbro
tl~ere snail be no other facilities pe~itt~d in tl~is buffer.
T~ buffer ~nall b~ landscaped with oraam~n:al trees and
of adjacent properties by ~it~er landscaping or ~encing. A
landscapinq plan depicting this ~e~iremant snail b~ sub-
mitted to ~e ~lanning Depart~nt for approval in con-
junction with ~it~ pla~ review.
3. Uses per, fred snell be limited to a contractor's office,
or industrial activity permitted un tnt site,
4. One (1) si~, not to exceed ~ignt (8) square feet in area
and a ne~gnt of ten (10) feet, shall be permitted identi-
fying tni~ U~.
Prior to tz~e issuance of an occup~cy pe~it, a~itionnl
6. T~R access drive and adjoining customer parking area s~alt
area may either be paved or ~y b~ graveled wlt~ a minimum
of six (~) inches of ~21 or 2lA stone.
7, Concret~ curb and gutter snail be installed around tnt
means (i.e., ti~er~, railroad ties, etc.) (EESP)
8. P~ior to release of any building pe~its, thirty-five (35}
Road, s~,alt be dedicated to and for %ne COunty of
Cn~s~grfield, fr~e and aPres=rioted. (T)
86~49
Tns previous conditions notwit~standing, all bulk require-
r~e~ts of t~e General Business (~-3) District snell apply.
Ayes~ Mr. Dodd, Mr. Applsgate, Mrs. Girone and Mr. Mayas.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
86S017
In Bermuda Magistmriat District, JOHN CARL~0N BOWRY, SR.
requested a Conditional Use to permit a turkey s~oot in a Hesvy
Industrial (M-3) District on a 1.0 acre parcel fronting
approximately 300 feet on tz~a south line o~ Willis Road, ap-
proximately 4~0 feet east of Soutnwood Road, Tax Map 82-2
Gravel Pit Farms, Part of Parcels 13 and 14 (Sheet
Mr. Psole stated the Planning Comm~sslon nad recommended denial
of the request. F~r. Buwry was not present. Mr. Dodd stated
z~ad resaived some c~plnin:s previo~sl~ but n~ nad not ~a~d
anything lately about the operation. ~e stated %~a~ if ~{r. Bowr
OD motion Of Mr. Dodd, ~conded by Mr. Applog~te, the Boar~ ~anie
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Appleqate, Mrs. Giron~ and ~tr.
~bs~nt: ~%r. Daaiel.
~6s619
In Midlofnian Magi~teriai Dief~ict, McDON~tLD'S CORPORATION
requeeted rezoning from Community ~usiness (B-2) to General
Business (B-3) on a 1.3 acre parcel fronting approxi~tely 190
feet on tnn nort~ line of ~idlo=nian Turnpike, approximately 20~
feet wesf of North Pinetta Drive. Tax Map 18-13 (t) Parcel 9
of the request subject to certain prcf£er$. Mr. ~d Willey was
present representing the applicant and aqreed to wire,draw proffer
#1 as recommended by the Planning Commission. Tnsxe wa~ no
opposition present. On mstion cf Mrs. Girone, ~econded by Mr.
DODO, t~o BOa~ approve~ t~i~ request subject to acceptance of
the fells'lng proffers:
T~ volume O£ any o~tdoor ~peake~ system s~a!l be suc£~ that
it does not create a nuisance for nsarby residential
properties.
2. Ail outdoor ligntin~ s~atl be positioned so as not to emit
light in=o or glare into nearby residential properties,
3. The applicant snell comply with all requirements of the
Envlrork~ental E~gineerlng Department.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, ~. Appl~gate, Mrs. Girone and Mr. Mayas.
Absent~ Mr. Daniml~
requested rezoning frc~ Agricultural {A) to Office Business {0)
with Conditional Uso Planned Devslopment to permi~ bulk (so,back)
exceptions on.e 1.~ acr~ parcel frontln? approximately 300 feet
on ~ne east lzne of ~uguenet Road opposx~e Olde Csaen Dr±v~.
Map i6-8 (I) Parcel 22 (Sneer 7).
8~-250
~ir. POOLS stated the Planning Commission nad recommended approval
of tnls request gubjaet to certain oonditlens. ~r. David Snea
p~esent representing the applicant. Tner~ was nQ opposition
2. All buildings snell bs located a minim~ of t~irty (30} feet
sz~all be supplemented with additional landscaping and/er
bering between the right of way and ~%~ building. Tn~
Planning ~ission for approval in cQnju~ction with
~cnematic plan review. Within thirty {30 days of rough
clearing and grading, detailed landscaping plans snell be
s~mi~ted to the Planning Deper~ent for approval.
NO buildinq s~:all exceed a height ~f two (2) stories. In
approval.
i~rovemsn%s Or in accordance wi~ the G~n~ra~ Plan 2000,
5. Prior to issuance of an occupancy p~it, additional
Department. (T)
6. This development 's~all be limited to a single access 9oint
Drive. The access s~all b~ desired a~d cons=rutted to be
~na~d With tn~ adjacen~ Office Business {o) property to
ncr%l~ (zoning Ca~e ~6S0~3).
project into adjacent prope~tiuu. A lighting plan snell be
submitted to the ~lanning Departmu~t for approval ~n
conjunction With final sits plan ~evlew.
8. If the adjacent Offic~ Business (O) property to %~e north
nam no freestanding ~ign, a single freestanding sign visible
to H~guenct ~ad snell be permitted. Ti/is sign shall not
e/teed an aggregate area of fift~ {50) square feet and a
height of t~n (10] feet. Tni~ $ign may be ex~ernally
lighted, but m=y only be internally lig~ted i~ tne sign
fiel~ i$ opaque with translucen~ letters or sy~ols.
{0) proper=y =o the north, there s~all b~ no freestanding
bu~ine~ ~ign per~iteed o~ this property. Other freestand-
ing si~s, for directional and identifioa=ion purposes, ~y
loua=ion ~oes not pe~it visibili=y from Huguenot Road or
adjacent properties. All o%ner signs snell be as regulated
86-251
in the Offic~ BUSiness (O) District wit~ the exception that
signs may be externalt~ lighted; but may only be internally
llg~ted if t~e sign ~ie%d is opaque wi~ translucent letters
o~ ~y~ol~. P~ior to ar~ction of any signs, a sign packag~
Shall be m~mi%tmd to the Plannin~ Depar~ent for approval.
~erlmetsr o~ all ~riveways an~ parkin~
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr, Appleqate, ~s. G~rone and ~. ~ayem.
86S024
In Dale Magisterial Distrin%~ COUNTRY ~AP24S CONVEMI~M? 5t%RTS
ASS0C%AT~ requested an amsn~ent to a conditional Use Pissed
Development (Case 8~8054} Condition 4 ~o pe~it internally %ign~e
of ~rner Road, also fronting approximately 130 feet on the north
of the intersection of these roads. Tax Map ~0-6 (i) P~re~l 64
(Sheet 15}.
applicant. There was no opposition ~esent.
On ~tion of ~. Dodd~ seconded by ~. Applegate, the Board
approved ~is r~quest.
Ayes: ~. D0dd, Mr. kppl~gate, ~$. Girone and ~. ~yes.
~sent: ~r. Daniel.
~6s027
In ~atoaca Magisterial District, JA~LES S. RITCHI=, JR. requested
re~ouing from AgriCultural {A) to Residential (R-i~) un ~ 44.7
~ver Road OppOglte Magnolia Avenue. Tax Map 187-2 (1) Parcel
(Sheets 53 and 54).
~. Peele sta%~d t~e Planning Co~ission nad reco~ended approval
of this request s~ject to a ~ingl~ co~Oi~ion. R~. Jim Ritcni~
was present and stated ne understood and agreed wi%n
hi~ ~eque~t ~nbjeet to the following condition:
A fifty (50) foot buffer and building setback snali
tain~ along R~ver Road, Tni~ buffer snalt be exclusive of
utility easements excep~ tnos~ treat cro~s the easements
perpendicular to t~s buffer, No individual lot access s~aI1
be permitted thrOUgh the bnffer. The buffer s~all be land-
~cape~ wl%~ plmnts which will screen rear yards from ~ver
Road. A b~rm ~y be installed in t~e buffer. A landscaping
plan dapicting tnis re~irm~nt shall be submitted for
approval within t/.irty (30} day8 of tentativu Subdivision
approval of ~nis ~i%e. The subdivision snall not be raeord-
ed ~%il the landscaping plan nas been submit%ed and ap-
prove~ by the ~lanning Departing. Final c~euk and record
plats snail snow the re~ired buffer. (P)
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Applegate, ~m. ~i~one and Mr.
~en%: Rt. Daniel.
In ~ermuda Magisterial Di~ric~ ~AN~ DAVIS requested rezoning
from Agricultural (A) fo Light Industrial (M-t) On a 19.0
parcel frontin~ approxi~tely 750 feet on t~e nor~ line of
Muffin Mill Road, approximately 1,050 feet ca~t of 1-95. Tax Map
150-~ (2) ~a~k~ Valley ~arm$, Lets ~A and 8 (sheet 42).
of t~is request subject [o a single condition. Mr. Zane Davis
this re,est sub)eot to the following condition:
A ~iity (50) ioof buffer snalI be ~intained along Ruffin
~1! Road. T~e nortner~os~ twenty-five f25) fa~t of this
buffer ar~a may b~ utilized for parking. Trois buffer S~all
areas. A d~taile~ landscaping plan ~nall be ~ubmitted
the Planning Depar~en~ for approval i~ conjunction wi~n
final Bit~ plan review. Ot~e~ t~an utiliti~$~ which ~y run
generally perpendicular ~nrougn ~ne b~ff~r, a single
to Ruffin ~ill Road and tau parking area d~scrib~d ner~in,
tnere gna11 be no otner facilities p~i~ted wire,in
buff,r.
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, ~. Applegate, Mrs. Girone and Mr. Mayer.
~sent: ~. Daniel.
In Midlotnian ~4~gisterial District, G&~, INC. requested amenclment
to a previously granted rezoning (Case 815113) eo amend the
lies in a Residential (R-25) District on two (2) parcels of land
for a total of 1.6 acres, the first parcel fro~%iag
103 feet on the north line cf Castle~ord Road, approximately 900
ap~roxlma~ly 900 fue~ w~ of Cast!eford Terrace. Tax Ma~ 7-13
(3) Salisbury Cas%leford, Lots 38 ~d 41 (Snee~ 2).
applicant. There was no opposition present.
On ~tion of ~s. Girons, seconded by ~. Dodd, the Board
Ayes~ Mr. D~dd, Mr. Applegate, Mrs. Girone and Mr.
~sent: Mr. Daniel.
86S035
In Clover Rill Magisterial District, $OUTHGATE ASSOCIATES
requested amen~ent to Cen~itlonal Use Planne~ Development (Cass
85S076) to permit bulk (parking space size and loading space
requirements} exceptions in an 0f~ice Business (0) District on a
line of Midlotnian Turnpike, approximately ],100 feet east of
east Line of NOrth Arch Road, approximately 150 feet south of
Knign~sbridge Road. Tax Map 28-1 (t] Parcels 8 and 9 (Sheet 8).
Mi. ~QOle sta%~d tn~ Planning Co~mi~Eion n~d r~ee~nend~d approval
of the request snbject to certain conditions. Mr. ~arles
conditions were acceptable. Mr% Dodd stated tt~is wa~ adjacent to
the Pownite corri~Qx and inquired if ~e County were planning ~o
86-253
take any position on tile portion of the land wnlcn might
needed for an interchange if nothing else ~appens. ~r.
s~a~ed ~e understood ~nis proper~y nad ~een already d~ign~d
acquired. There was no op~si~ion present.
On ~tion of ~. ApDlegate, seconded by ~r. Dodd, ~n~ Board
approved this re~est subject to t~e following
A~ %ne ti~ of $~n~ma~ic pled r~view, ~e Pla~ing
sion may grant a 8.5 foot exception to the ten (10) foot
parking spaoe widen requirement. T~e ~lanning Co~is~ion's
tne site is such that a nigh t~rnover of vehicles is Dot
~pect~d.
2. Where the parking space ~ize is reduce~, parkin~ areas snell
to include within the p~rking ar~a or adjacent to the
area snell contain a minim~ o~ 100 s~are f~et and snnll
primary landscaping material used in parking areas shall
tr~s wnicn provid~ sna~e or are capable of providing snads
at maturity. Eaon landscaped area snell include at least
one ~1) :tee, having a ~lear tru~k of a~ leas= five (~)
for eau~ 2~0 squar~ feet, or fraction %~reof, of required
inter~or landscaped area. The re~ining ar~a snalI b~
complement the tree landscaping. Landscaped areas snail
reason~ly disperse~ ~nrougnou= =ne par~ing area or a~Daoent
to tz~e parking area and snell be lucated ~o as to divide and
break up the ~xDanm~ of Daring. Tn~ area d~gn~ted
t=~ese r~quirements snell be Submitted to the Planning
Co,lesion for approval in conjunction with schematic plan
r~vi~w. A detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted
the Planning Department for approval within ninety (90) days
of roug~ ~learing and grading. (P&CPC)
3. At t~e time of scz~ematic plan review for ~2 use,
Planning Co, lesion ~y modify Zoning Ordinance requirements
r~lative ~o the n~er, size, and location of off-street
loading spaoes, based upon t~e determination rna=
re~ired by tiaa Zoning Ordinanoe, and that the location
86S036
In Midlotnien }lagisterial Disfrict~ HAYWOOD-CLARKE PORSCHE-AUDI~
I~C. requ=stad amen~enf to Conditional Use ~la~d Developmenf
(Ca~e 84S019) ~lative to n~r and ill~nation of ~ign~ in a
General easiness (B-3} District on a 4.54 a~re parsul fronting
approxi~tely 670 feet on tn~ north lin~ of Midlot*~ian Turnpike,
of increasing =ne size of =~ primary freestanding ~ign ~j~c~
to a single condition, reco~ended denial for a second free-
standing sign and reco~ended approval of ~.e requ~s~ for
amen~ent to the llgnting standards on %ne ~i~s. Mr. Rick G~bbs
96-254
was present representing tz~e applicant. Mrs. Girone stated sue
did not feel ~n~ reque~%~ were
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by ~. Dodd, the Board
approved all requests of tz~e applican~ s~ject to the following
conditions ~
1. Tn~ prOpOSed dealersz~iD snell be Debitted one (1} free-
standing sign, not to exceed an aggregate area of 168
s~are feet and a nei~t Of thirty (30) feet; and a
feet.
(Note: This condition supersedms conditions
Development 84~019.)
2. Signs ~y b~ internally and/0~ externally lighted.
(Note: This condition supersedes condition
845019,)
Ayes: ~tr. Dodd, Mr. Applegate, Mrs. Girone and Mr. Mayas.
Abuent: Mr. Daniel.
~6~037
In Bermuda ~agisterial District, C~NE AUtOmOtIVe, ~NC. re~ues~e~
r~oning from Co~munlty Business (B-2) to G~neral Business (B~3)
on a 0.71 acre parcel fronting appr0×~mat~ly t53 fe6t on the
nort£~ line of ~illis Road, approximately 150 feet ~ast cf
Jefferson Davis Highway. Tax Map 81-8 (1) Part of Parcel 65
F~r. Peele stated the Planning Commission nad recommended approval
of t~e request. Mr, Jonn Dickey was present representing the
was concerned with zoning B-2 to B~3 WithOUt eondition~ of wnnt
trying to upgrade the area and the proposal is an improvement;
Ayes: Mr. ~odd, Fr. Applegat~, Mrs. Qirone and Mr. ~ayeu.
86S041
In Midlotnian Magisterial District, THE UNITED STATES POSTAL
~E~¥ICB requested amendment to Conditional Use Planned
Development (Case 79S102) to permit an e~ception to the 12,000
square foot gross ~loor area limitation ~or individual stores and
shops in a Convenience Business (B-l) District on a 3.52 acre
parcel fronting approximately 345 feet on the east line of
Sycamore Square Drive, also fronting approximately 357 feet on
t~ south llne of Wesffleld Road and located in the southeast
qu=dr~nt of tu~ intersection of these roads. T~x Map 15--12
Parcel 1O4 (sheet
Mr. Peele stated t~e Planning commission nad recommended approval
On motion Of Mrs. Girene, seconded by PLr. Applegate, the Board
88-255
Ayes: Mr. Dodd, Mr. Applegate, Mrs. ~irone and Mr. Fk%yes.
A~sentz ~4r, Daniel.
wo~k session on ~ne S~condary Road Six Year Pla~. It was
g~n~rally agreed that since ~r~e Eoar~ me,ers would be out
t~n d~ring that timee ~nat ~f the ot~r three felt it
one could be ~eld i~ t~,=ir absence. Mr. Hedrick suggested
me,ting.
On motion o~ Mr. F~yes~ seconded by Mr. Doddr ~e Board adjourned
at 3:35 p.m. until 7:00 p.m. on April 9, 1986.
Ayes: ~r. Dodd, ~Ir. Apple~ate, NLrs. G~rone a~d NLr. ~&yes.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
Ri~n~rff L. Hedrick
County Administrator
R. ~arland ~odd~-=~
Chairman