Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
09-28-1988 Minutes
tt0AKD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 1988 Supurvleors in Attendance: Mr. G. ~. App!egate~ Chairman Mr. M_ B. Sullivanr Vice Chaiman Mr. C. F. C~rrin, Jr. Mr. ~arry G. Daniel Mr. Jesse J. Mayas Mr. Lane B. Ramaey County A~i-istrator Mre. Doris De~art~ Ass~. Co. Admin., Legist SvOS. Intergovern. Affairs Ms. Amy Davis, Assr, to Co, M~. Joan Dclezal, Clerk to ~he Board Mr. Bradford S. Ham~er, Deputy Ce. Admin., ~r. Thoma~ ~. Di~. of Planning Ms. ~ary Leu Lyle, Mr. R. J. McCracken, Transp. Director Mr. Richard MeElfish, Dir. of Env. Eng. ~r. Steve Mi0a$, CO. Attorney Mrm, Pauline Mitchell, Dir. of News/Info. services Col. Joseph Pittman, Chief of Police ~r. Richard Sale, Deputy Co. Admin., Development Mr. Jay Stegmaier, Dir. of Budget Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr., Dir. of Park~ & Rec. Dir. of Utilities ~r. Frederick Willis, Dir. of Resource Management Mr. Applegate called the meeting to order at 9:02 a.m. 1. INVOCATION Mr. Apptegate introduced Reverend Joe Vought, ~astor Lutheran Church of Our savior~ who gave the invocation. of 2. pr.~nGE OF ~T~T.'t:~A.lgC"~ ~l~ ~ ~'LAG OF THE ONITE/) STATES OF The Pledge of Allegiance America was recited. to the Flag of the United Stat~s of On motion of Mr. C~rrin, seconded by Mr~ Daniel, the approve~ the minutes o~ September 14~ 1980, as submitted. Vote: Unanimous Board There were no County Administratorre comments at this Mr. Daniel reported he attended the Capital Region Airport commission meeting and stated ~he Airport is continuing experience a decline in air traffic as i$ nationally but under ~he circ~stances the Airport is doing well. He ~tat~d that he, Mr. kpplegate and relatives of A~iral Byrd a~%ended dedication ceremony of th~ retinal building in honor of Admiral General Asse~ly meeting on solid waste management regulation~ the papers of %he Hoard. Nr. Currln reported he attended the Capital Area Tralnlnq Consortium meeting in Rio~ond at which Chesterfield County was amked to participate in a s~er school progr~ for wi~h assistance p~OV~ded for Ob~alnlnq jobs while attending school, to which the public and private n~ckor~ con%ribuke. requested that staFF look into the program and the po~mibility Village Plan would be dimcussed on October 17, 19gg and October 19, 1985 at the Thoma~ Dale Kigh School cafeteria fr~ p.m. to 9:00 p.m. in which the citizens would have an =unity to suggest ideas and improv~ent= for :he co~uni:y of Ch~t~r in a work~hop format. Mr. Sullivan state~ %hat the Midlcthian Village Plan would presented September 29, 19~8 a~ 6:30 ~.m. at Midlothian High School and he encouraged everyone to attend. He al~o late 2000~. Mr. Currin r~quested a joint work session between the Board cf phy of Chesterfield and ~e two groups. 6. REOITESTS TO POSTPONE ACTION~ EMERGEt~CY ADDITIONS OR ~S IN T~ O~ OF P~S~ATTON On mo~io~ of Mr. Currln, ~conded by ~r. Sullivan, the Board moved Item ll.E.5.~ Ra~ol~tion supporting Elimination o~ Through Traffic on Old W~r~on Drive in Salem WQQdS Subdivision, out of ~equenca to be heard i~ed~ately roll,lng Item 8.: added Item 11.D.7., Option to ~urchase ~roperty Adjacent to Point o~ ROCks Park; added I~m ll.D.8., Airport ObBtruction Removal - Project 05~ added Item ll.E., Execu:iv~ Session ~o consult with legal counsel regarding Robbin~ ver~n~ Wes~el and Section 2.1-344(a) (6) of the Code of Vir~inia~ 1950, as ~end- ~d, which will be hear4 i~edia~ely following Item ll.G., and Vote: Unanimous There were no reeolucions and s9ecial recognitions at this time. ~-703 There were no hearing~ of citizens On ensuheduled matters or ll.E.5. RESOLUTION SUPPORTING ELTMINA~IQN 0F THEOUGE T~AFFIC ON OLD WAR$ON DRIVE I~ SALEM WOODS SUBDIVISION Mr. Sale stated that the Board had referred to %he Planning Commission r~coD$ideration of the County's policy regarding stub roads and a public hearing had been conducted by the Planning Commission. He stated that testimony hsd bess given from various residents who w~r~ exp~rienclng difficulty with stab roe~s ~utting through their neighborhoods. He stated that the Planning Commission requested that the portion dealing with stub roads be submitted to the soard at a later time, but that the Board consider a ~e~olution requesting the Virginia D~part- msnt of Transpertatio~ to consider the elimination of throuqh traffic On Old Werso~ Drive in Salem Woods SubOivi~ion. Mr. Russell Cunningham, Chairman of ~he Neighborhood Watch of the Salem woods ~omeowners A~ociatfon~ requested that the Boar~ of Supervisors ~n~ the resolution %o the Virginia Department c~ Transportation recommending the olcsing of 01d WaTson Driv~ in ~lem Woods Subdivision. He stated a petition with hundrad~ of ~ignatures had been sent to ~r. Daniel re- questing this action. He stated ~ny of the residents had been under the ~mprmssion that Old WaTson Drive and Thorington Drive would never be connected. He stated in 1986, the Virginia Department of Transportation had ~urveyed the street and estimated that the =chicle tripe per day numbered 2,500 vehicles for a 1/2 mile strip on Old Narson Drive and that less than 10% of these 9ehlcle tripe per day warm made by residents o~ Salem Woods. He ~tated he felt that Old Warson Drive should have bee~ a spine road for the nelghberhoud and that with the exception of a f~w cul-de-sacs~ every street in the subdivision leads into Old Wareon Drive. He stated th~ recreation and leisure facility is also located in the middt~ of Old Warson Drive. ~e outlined measures taken by residents to help elimin- ate the situation; however, state~ such measures are of no assistance when others use the road as a thoroughfare. He expressed conc~rn~ of safety ~or pedestrians due to speeding and the number of vehielem. He stated it is only a matter cf time before ~omeoue is killed. He stated that Moms improve- ments to the road had been made, such as e yellow line down Old WaTson Drive, stop signs, no parking signs, e~e. He sba=ed thst the subdivision had experienced major problems with speeding violations and Uhat in the first seven months o~ thle ~ear, 48 sur~onses bad been iusued for speeding and reckless driving. ~e outlined requests to VDOT which had been denie~ and steps bh~ residents had taken upon themselv,e %o help the area. Mr. Daniel stated that thi~ has been an ongoing problem for the residents in Salem Woods Subdivision and that every proper procedure had bess followed to eliminate the problem. He stated that it is a very ~eriou~ safety problem an~ oommende~ all the citizens in Salem Woods for their diligent efforts in resolving thi~ ~it~atien. On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted= Board of Supervisors' support for eliminating through tra£fio en 01d WaTson Drive; and WH=I~EAS, 01~ WaTson Drive is a local street and is net intended to carry high volumes of traffic; and WHEREAS, Centralia Road and Salem Churph RQa~ ar~ arterial roads and are intended to carry high volumes of traffic; and WMER~AS, Centralia Road and Salem Church Road provide an acceptable alternate route for throuqh traffic now utilizing 01d Warmon Road; and WNER~A~ through traffic utilizing Old Warmon Drive a threat te the health, safety, and welfare of the residents cl HOW, TBEP~FOR~, B~ IT R~SObV~D, that the Board cf Supervisors of Chemterfield County re~ueztm the Virginia Department of ~rensportation to :eview end sd~ress possible ~olutiens to the through traffic problem on Old Watson Drive. Mr. Daniel requested that a transcript of Mr. Cunninpham~s co, eats be ~erwarded ~o the Virginia De~a~ment o£ Transporta- tion. 9. D~k~D ITEM& ACQUIRING A SEWBR ~J~S~FL~HT ACRO~ ERORRRT¥ OF MRS. LAVELETTE G. HENRY Mr. Sale stated that Sprln$ Trace Associates has requested the County to aid them iD ~cquiri~g an e~m~Dt for ~ sewer lia~ across the property of Mrs. Lavelette G~ Menry~ Ne ztated that due to public health sad safety purposes he was recommendin~ that the Board authorize the Riqht-of-way Manager to aid the develeper in acquiring the sewer easement for Spring Tra=e A~oeiates. Mr. Mayas inquired if it was necessary to use eminent domain to acqulz~ the sewer ~a~ement and if Spring Trae~ A~$oeiat~s had attempted to negotiate with the pxoperty owner~. Mr. Sale ~tat~d that negotiations were attempted but with no decision; however, thi~ aetiou would no% clo~e negotiatlc~s Mr. Mayas inquired if th~ p~O~erty oWnerS would benefit from the sawer easement, Mr. Sale stated that all of %he property owners would benefit from the sewer eamement in that the subdivision would be ~onnec%ed to public s~war and water. Mr. Currin stated that the ~awer line would al~o ~er~e additional property upstream as well. There was considerable discussion on the technical aspects, County policies/procedures, responsibilities on condemnation cases, legal counsel which would have to be obtained, the policy of facilitating public water and sewer services to other Mr. Mayas stated that the contractor agreed to go aroun~ the property when he r~que~ted ~oning and that is indicated in the minutes. After further discussion, the Hoard tabled this 9.B. REQUEST TO AID QUEENEMILL CORPORATION IN ACQUIRING A ~AN~KE Mr. Sale stated the Queensmill Corporation has r~qu~sted the County to aid them in acquiring a sewer easement across the p~operty of ~r. and Mrs. William G. Han~ke. Mr. Sullivan stated that he had met with the property ow~er~ and staff. ~e requested that the Board defer the matter thirty doy~ to allow time for him and staff to meet with the Eaneke's on September 29, 1988. On motion of Mr. sullivsn~ seconded by Mr. ~ayes, the Board deferred oonsidsra~ion of ~he request to aid Queensmill Corpo- ra%ion in acquiring a sewer easement across the property of Mr. an~ Mrs, Nilliam G. Raneke to give staf~ an opportunity to meet with the property owners, until October 26, 19~8. 10. PUBLIC~ARI~G8 10,A. TO CO~SIDER COI~fEYA~CE OF LEASES OF REAL PROPERTY A~ C~E~T~R~i~LD ~OUBT~OU$=, MIDLOTHIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL, PROVIDENCE MIDDLE SCEOOL AND IRCNBRIDGE ~ARK FOR 0P~RATION 0F FOOD CONCESSIONS ~r, Sti~h ~teted ~hi~ date and tLme had been scheduled for a public hearing to con~ider conveyance of /eases of ~sal property at Chss~erfletd Courthouse, Midlothian M~ddle SohooS, Providence Middle school and Ironbridge Park ~or operation of some discussion r~garding bidding procedures, who cad bid, what otker or~anizatlon~ opera=e ~oed concessions, etc. On motion of Nc. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes~ the Board approved the conveyance of leases o~ real property to the Ches=er~iel~ Quarterback League to operate food oonoemsions at Che~ter£i~ld Coat.ease, Midlothian Middle School, Providence Middle School and Ironhridge Park from September 10, 1988 to Novsmber 12, 5988 and authorized the County Administrator to 10.B. TO CON$ID~ AN 0RDINA~C~ TO AMEND TH= COD~ OF TR~ COU~T~ OF CHESTE~FIRLD~ 1978, AS A~LENDED, BY A/~ENDING SECTION 19-34 AND 1~-~ R~LATING TO TAXICABS AND OT~ER VEHICLES FOR HIR~ Mr. Micau stated this date and time had been advertised for u ~ublio hearing eo consider an or~inance to amend the C0untx Code relating to taxicabs and other vehicles ~or hire and b~efly explaine~ ~he reasanin~ for the proposal. Mc. Applegat~ inquired if the 0rdin~noe was consistent with Henr~co and the City of Richmond. Mr. Micas state~ that the effect of the ordinance was eonslstent~ No on~ Came forward to ~pea~ in favor of or against th~ pro- posed ordinance, On motion of Mr. SulLivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board adop=ed the following ordinance: OF ~S~I~, 1978, AS ~D, ~Y ~ING S~ION 19-34 ~ ]9-35 ~TING ~ T~I~S BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of ~upe~isors of Chesterfield County that; 1. Section~ 19-34 and 19-35 o~ the Coun=~ Code of ~hester- !iel~, 1978, as amended, are amended by ~ending and reenaQting the following sections: 88-706 ~c. 1~-~4. a~quire~= c~rtain ~er~ons prohibited. A. NC person shall ~rive or operate a public vehicle, taxicab or for-hire car within ~he county unless he ~hall have obtained a special license to be known aa u "public vehicle driver's license," which shall be in addition to any other license required of suet person. B. The chief o~ police cf the Connty shall not i~sue a public vehicle driver's license to any person who has been convicted of or ha~ pled gnilty to or ha~ pled n01o contendero to any ef the following: (1) A fel0ny~ (2) Any larceny, a~sault, buttery, crime cf moral turpitude Or illegal possession of controlled substances where such crime is other than a felony; (3) Operatinq a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol or drugs7 (4) Three (3) or more moving violations under the ~otor vehicle laws of =his Commonwealth, ether then those involving operating a motor vehicle while under the influenc~ of alcohol or ~rugs, with{n the preceding twelve [12) mcnths~ er of any other local law in this Co~onwealth governing the operation oi ta~ieab~ er ether for-hire cars er vehiclem within the preceding twelve (12) month~. Sec. 19-35. Application$ inPormation required. Application for a pttblie vehicle driver's license ~hall be made in writing to the chief of police Of the county, an~ shall shew the ~ellowing: (a) Pull name of applicant. (hi P~eSent address. (c) Age and place of birth. (d) Places of previous address and employment for the five (~) years. Height, weight, color, color of ~eye~, color of hair and sex. t~on. eyesight. Whether or not applicant i$ in. go0~ physical Whether er net applicant has good hearing and good the period cf two {2) years last past, addicted te the use of in~oxleatin~ liquefy, drugs or other farms of narcotics, and, (i) WhetheY or not applicant has ~ver b~en convicted cf, pleaded guilty to or entered a plea of nolo contendere to, any of the matbe~ contained in Section 19-34(b), and, if so, such other information as may be required by ~he Chief of Police. (j) The record of applicant with respect to offenses offenses affecting the sui=ability of the applicant as a person who should be permitted to operate a public vehicle, including ~8-707 assault and battery and other offenses a~ainst the person and larceny and robbsry. (k) Whether or not applicant has previously been employed or licensed as a driver or chauffeur, and, if ac, whether er not his license or permit has ever been revoked or suspended for any reason. (1) What experience, if any, applicant has had in the operation of cars. (m} The na~e a~d address of the owner of the for~hire vehicle to b~ operated by applicant and if diXferent, the name and address of the company for whom the applicant will he driving. Each applicant shall apply for his license in person, and have his fingerprints take~, which fingerprints shall consti- tute a part of his application, and each applicant shall fils with his application two (2) recent photographs of himself, oX a size designated by the chief of police, one (1) of which shall he attached to, and shall be=omc part a pat of, the application, and the other of which ~hall be attached to ehe license, if issued, in such ~ manner that no other photograph may be substituted therefor without probability of detection. Vote: Unanimous I0.C. TO CONSIDER A~ ORDINANC~ TO ~=ND T~ CODg OF T~E COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS ~/~ENDEB, BY AMENDING SECTIONS 17-~8 A~D 17-29 ~t~LATING TO EASEMENT AND RIGHT-Of-WAY VACATION APPLICATIONS AND FEES Mr, Mica~ stated thi~ date and rims had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an or4inance to amend the County Code rulating to eas~r~nt and right-of-way vacation applica- tions and f~$ en~ briefly outlined the effect o~ th~ proposal. ~o one came forward to spsak in ~avor o~ or against the pro- posed ordinance. There was some di~c~n~ion regarding the increase, cost re- On motion of ~r. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board adopted the following ordinance: AN O~DINA~C~ ~0 AM~D xa~ CODE OF TH~ CO~14TY SECTIONS 17-~8 ~ 17-~9 ~TING ~ ~T ~ ~G~-OF-~AY WA~TION ~P~I~TION~ ~ FEES BE IT O~AINBD by the Board of Sup~r~i~Qr~ o~ 1. Sections 17-28 and 17-29 of the County Code o~ Chester- field, 1978, as amended, are ~end~d by amending ~n~ the following sections: Section 17-28. Application. Each application to uacmte ~ street, alley, road, m~nt, public way, plat or portion thereof pursuan~ to Section 15.1-481 Or 15.1-482 of the Cod~ of Virginia, as ~nded, shall be submitted to the right-of-way section of ~he depar~ent of utili~Les for admini~trn%ive revisw pTior submission to the board of supervisors. ~uch application shall be made on form~ provided for ~hat purpose by %he right-of-way seution. 8u=h application shatl bs accompanied by all ment~ r~qui~ed by Section i5.1-481 or 15.1-482 of the Code of 88-708 Section 17-29. Fees. In addition to th~ ~timat~d Cost Of ~dvortising the notice of the public hearing to consider the ordinance to vacato, tho applioaDt shall pay to the county an application processing fee of one hundred dollars ($100.09) for each application submitted pursuant to Section 15.1-482.1 of tho Code of virginia, as amended. Vote: Unani~o~ 10.D. TO CONSIDER CONVEYANCE OF A 2.5 ACRE PARCEL IN THE CBE~T~RFI~LE ATR~ORT INDUStRiAL PA~K TO D~LTA ASSOCIATES, E.E., INC. Mr. Sale stated thi~ dat~ and t~ had ~een scheduled for a public h~aring to consider th~ conveyance of a 2.5 acre parcel of land at the Airport Industrial Park to Delta Associates, P.E., Inc. NO one was present to ad~res$ %he matter. ~here was some On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Eoard sociates, P.E., Inc. (A copy of the plat is filed with the 10.E. TO CONSIDER AN 0~DINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE ROUTE 10/LEWIS ROAD AREA SPECIAL T~X OR ASSESSmeNT SEWER DISTRICT TO CONSTRUCT CERTAIN SEWER FACILITIES THEREIN A/~D TO IMPOSE CERTAI~ TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS UPON OWNERS OF BRO~ERT¥ LOCATED TREREIN BY ENACTING ARTICLE ~,, CNA~TER 20 Mr. Sale mtated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to establish the ROUt~ 10/Lewis Road Area Special Tax or Assessment Sewer District to con~truct c~rtain sewer facilities therein and %0 certain t~ss or assessments upon owner~ of property located %herein by enacting Article ~, Chapter 2O. ~e stated that property cwner~ would like tn request the public hearing be rescheduled or de£erre~ to give them time to see if other methods of fimancinq could be worked out or to p~rnse the assessment district concept. ~r. Currin scared he me= with ~he praperty owners at which tima he indicated he had a conflict of. interest; however, he felt there could bo a solutlon worked out and suggested a sixty day deferral. He Btated, after discnssing the matter with the County Attorney, he was advised h~ should disclose to the Eoard that he, along with other~, ~wns some of the land involved, declared a conflict of interest pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act and excused himself from the meeting. Mr. George Beadles, Jr. stated that ha had revlswed the pro- posed boundarie~ of the district and felt.there are several environmental problems that may happen and should be included in the district. Me stated that the landfills in the area ~hould be included in this projact and, at that .time, the County ~hould con~ider discharging the Ieachate from landfills into the sewer system. He discussed a waste water 98-709 treatment plant On Swift Creek, discharge into the James River, otc. Mr. Mayee requested that he be notified of any meetings with the property owners and staff in the future. Mr, Daniel requested that a complete financial chart be pre~ pared indicating how the money would b~ recovered should this assessment district be established. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board deferred consideration of the ordinance to establish the Route 10/Lewis Road Area Spatial Tax or Assessment sewer District, to construct certain s~w~r facilities therein, and to impose ~ertein taxes or assessments upon owners of property located therein by enacting Article X, Chapter 20, until November 23, 1988, and continued the public hearing until that time and should ~he~e be any ckanpe in land ar~a, fees, e~c., it would be rea~vertised. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, M~. Sullivan~ ~r. Daniel and Mx. Absent: Mr. Currln NEW BUSINESS ll.A. P~QUEST OF THE CHRISTMAS MOTHER FOR T~E 1988 C~RISTMAS MOTHER PR0~RA~ ~r. ~ammer introduced ~s. Rachel Holmss, who was reprssenting Ms. Hilda R. Teylo~, the 1988 Christmas Mother. M~. Holmes expressed reqr~ts for Me. ~ilda R. Taylor~s absence. She expressed appreciation ~er the Board's past and present suppor~ of the Christmas Mother Program as well as the excel- lent employee support throughout all the County departments and requested a contribution in the amount of $3,500 for the 1988 Mr. Currin returned to the meeting. On motion of the Board, the Board approved and authorized a donation in th~ amount of $3,~OO, £or th~ t988 Christmas Meth~ Program o~ which $3,000 wes previously budgeted, appropriated $500 from the General Fund ~alance for this proqram and further granted permission to solicit support from County employees. 11.~. SCHOOL CAPITAL PROJECT REVISIONS On me=ion of ~r. Ceftin, sezonded by xr. ~ayes, the Board appropriat~ $291,567 from the Food Service fund belance for =non, Zttrick, Greenfield and C.C. Wells Elementary Schools projects for food service equipment and renovation~ and ~et the date of October 28, 1988 at 9:0~ a.m. for a public hearing to con~id~r th~ appropriation of $760,000 fec0wered for Matoaca Magisterial District Middle School renovations, Vote: Unanimous COPRORATION On motion of ~r. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Boa~d suspended its rules to allow ~imultaneous nomination and appointment of Mr. Jesse J. Ma~e~ (Board representative) and Mr. C. F. Curr~n, Jr. (buslnsss representative) to th~ Appomattox Basin Industrial Development Corporation. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board simultaneously nominated and appointed M~. $~sse J. Hayes {Board representative) and Mr. C. F. Currin, Jr. {business representative) tc serve on the Appomattox Basin industrial Development Corporation, who~e ter~ are effective October 1, 1988 and will ~xpire September 30, 19~9. Vote; Unanimous /I.D. CONSENT ITEMS ll.D.1. APPROPRIATION OF REPAIRS TO LINDBERG DRI~ On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. ~ayss, the Board appropriated $600, £rem the Ma~oaca District Thre~ Cent Road Pund for plac~msnt of stone on 51ndberg Drive. Vote: Unanimous STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE REVISION FOR ~r~ST PROVIBENCE ROAD EXTENSION This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this ~oard made report in wri~inq ~pon hi~ examination of We~t Providence Road ~xtension, Clover Hill District. Upon con~ids~ation whereof, and on motion of ~r. Sblliva~, ~econded by Mr. Mayes, it is resolved that West Providence Read ~xtension, Clover Hill District, be and it hereby is establish- ed as a public road. And be it fur~he~ re$olveO, that the Virginia Dspartment of Tran~portstien, be and it hereby is requested to taks into the Westerly 0.24 mile to end in a dead end. This request is inclusive of the adjacsn~ slops, siqht distance Thi~ road serves adjacent parcels. This projsct was constructed with public ~chocl funds. There- right~of~way for this road. This section of West Providence Road Extension is recerdsd as follow~: Deed Hook 133~ Pag~ 845, Ju~y 26, 1~78. ll.D.3. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE This dny the County ~nvironmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this ~oard, made report in writing upon his ~xeminatien of Woodlake Village Parkw~y~ Acorn Aidge Road, Acorn Bidge Place and Acorn Ridge Court in Acorn Ridge, Clover Hill District. 88-711 Upon consideration whereof, an on motion o~ Mr. ~ulLivan, seconded by Mr. Mayas, it is resolved that Woodlake Villaqe Parkway, Acorn Ridge Road, Acorn Ridge Place and Acorn Ridge Court in Acorn Ridge, Clover Mill District, be and they hereby ar~ established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that tko Virginia Department of Woodlaks V~llage Parkway, Heather Glen subdivision, State number to be assignedr and going northerly 0.11 mile to the intersection with Acorn Ridge Road, th~n turning and going easterly 0,11 mile to end at prop0s~d Wo0dlake Village Parkway; Acorn Ridge Road, beginning at the intersection with Woodlaka Village Parkway and going easterly ~.06 milo to the inter- section ~ith Acorn Ridge Place, then continuinq easterly 0.08 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Acorn'Ridge ~lacc, beginning at th~ inte~sectlon with Acorn Ridge Road an~ going northerly m~le, then turn~ng an~ qo~ng easterly 0.05 mile to the inter- section with Acorn Ridge Court, th~n continuing easterly 0.04 mile, then turnin~ and go~ng southerl~ 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Acorn Ridge Court, beginning at the int~r- section with AcOrn Ridg~ Place and ~oin9 southerly 0.08 ~ile, then turning and going easterly 0.06 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This request is incI~sive of ~he ndgacent slope, sight d~stance and designated Virginia Dapart-m~nt of Transportation drainago These roads serve 63 lots. And be it further r~olved, that the Board o~ Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department ~f Transportation a $0' right-of-way for all of these roads except Woodlak~ Villag~ Parkway which has a llOr right-oR-way and Acorn Ridge Read which has a 50' to 70' variable width right-of-way. Vote: Unanimous This day the County Environmental Engineer, in acc0~dance with directienu from this Board, mad~ rsp0rt in writing upon his examination ef Fiddlers Ridge Road, F£ddler~ Ridgs Court, Fiddlers Ridge Lane and Fiddlers Ridge Place in Fiddlers Ridge, Clover ~ill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. May~ it i~ r~solved that ~iddler~ ~idge Roa~, Place in Fiddlers Ridge, Clover Hill District, be and they hereby are e~tabli~hed a~ public road~. And b~ it further r~olv~d, that fh~ Virginia Department of Transportadion, be and it hereby is requested to take into the section with Wo0dlake Village Parkway, S~nriss Bluff subdlvl- sion, State Route number to be assigned, and going westerly 0.03 mile to the intorsoction with Fiddler~ Ridg~ Court, then continuing westerly 0.06 milo to the in=ers~c~i0n with Fiddlers Ridge Lane, then continuing westerly 0.09 mile tc the inter- section with Fiddlers Ridge Place, then turning and goin~ southerly 0.09 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Fiddlers Ridge COUrt, beginning at the intersection with Fiddlers Ridge Road and going ~outh~rly 0.07 mile to ~nd in a cul-de-sac; Fiddlers Ridge Lane, beginning at the intersection with Fiddlers ~idge Road and going southerly 0.09 mile, then turning and going easterly o.o7 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Fiddlers Ridge 88-712 Place, beginning ac ~he intersection with Fiddlers Ridge Road and going westerly 0.06 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent ~lope, ~ight di~ance and designated Virginia Department 0~ Transportation drainage These roads serve 68 lots. And be it £urther re,dived, that the Hoard of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of these road~ exoppt Fiddlers Ridge Road which has a 5~' to 8O~ variable width right~of~way. Piddlers Ridge is recorded a~ follows: Plat Book 51, Pages 3 & 4, September 38~ 1985. Vote: Unanimous This day the County Environmental ~ngineer, in aooordance wit~ directions from this Board, mad~ report in writing upon hi~ examination of Woodlake villaqe Parkway and ~eather Glen ROAd in ~eather Glen, Clo~er ~ill District. Upon consideration whereo~, and on motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Ma~es, it is resolved that Woudlake Village Parkway and Heather Glen Road in ~ea~h~r Glen, Clover Hill Distrlut, be and they hereby are e~tabli~hed as public reads. And b~ it f~rther re~elved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested =c take into Secondary System, Woodlake Village Parkway, beginning at the end of Woodlake Vitlaqe Parkway, W~$t Brauch ~ubdlvision, Route number to ba assigned, and going northerly 0.06 mile to the int~r~tion w~th Heather Glen ~oad, ~hen continuing northerl~ 0.~8 mile to end at Woodlak~ Village Parkway, Acorn Ridge ~ubdivi~ion, ~tate Rout~ number to be assigned; and Heather Glen Road, beginning at the inter~eceion with ~oodlak= Village ~arkway and going easterly 0.06 mile, then turning and going northerly 0.03 mite to th~ inter~ection with it~e!f, then eontlnuln~ northerly O.0~ mile, then turning and going westerly 0.03 mile~ then burning and going southerly 0.04 mils to end at the intersection with itself. ~his requa~ i~ inclusive of thc a~jacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainag~ These roa~s serve 19 lots And be it further resolved, that the Board of Superviser~ guaxantee~ t~ the virginia Department of Transportation a right-uS-way £or Weo~lake village Parkway and a ~0' to 119" variabl~ width right-of-way for ~eather Glen Road. ~eathsr Glen is recorded as Plat Book ~ 9age~ 33 & ~, ~ep~e~r 11, 1986. Vote: UDanimcua Thi~ day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Boar~, mad~ report in writing upon his examination of Long Ccv~ Read, West Bay Road, Long Cove Place and Long Cove Court in Long Cove, Clover ~ill District. Upon oonsideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Sullivan,. ~econded by Mr. MayAS, it i~ ~esolved that Long Co~e Road, ~ay Koad, Long Cove ~lace and Long Cove Court in Long C0ve~ Cl~Ver Hill District, be and they hereby a~e established as And be it further reeolved~ that the Virginia Depar~ant of Secondary System, Long Cove Road, beginning et Long Cove Road, North Chase subdivision, Skate Route number to be assigned, and going easterly 0.~4 mile to the intersection with Wes~ Bay Road, ~h~n ~urning a~d going southerly 0.10 to the intar~actian with Lon~ Cove Place, then continuing southerly 0.04 mile the= intersestion with Long Cove Court, then turning and going westerly 9,06 ~ile to end in a cul-de-sac; W~s% Bay ~oad, beginning a~ the intersection with Long Cove Road and going 0.02 mile to end at Wast Bay Bead, West Bay subdivision, State Route number to be assigned; Long Cove Place, beginning at intersection with Long Cove Road and going easterly 0.08 mile, than turning and going southerly 0.08 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Long Cove Court, beginning at the intersection with Long Cove Road and going 0.04 mile to end ~n a cul-de-sac. This reg~est is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department cf Transportation drainage These roads serve 53 lorn. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Dapartman~ of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all ef the~e Long Cove i~ recorded ~a follows: Plat Bock 46~ Pages 58 & 59, July 13, 1984. This day the County Envlronmen=al zngineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination o~ Won~lake Village Parkway, Long Cove Road, North Chase Road, North Chas~ Court and ~orth Chase Place in North Chase~ Clover Rill District. Upon consideration whereof~ and On motion of Mr. Sullivan~ seconded by ~r. MayeR, it is resolved that Woodlake Village Parkway~ Long Cove Road, North Chase Road, North Chase Court and North Chase Place in North Chaae, Clover Hill Distriat, be and they hereby are %stablish~d a~ public road~. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Depaetment of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested t~ taka into the Secondary System, Noodlake Village Parkway, beginning at existing Woedlaka Village Parkway, State Route 3600, and going northert~ 0.39 mile to the intersection with Long Cove Road~ thsn continuing 0.01 mile to ~nd ~t Wncdlake Village Parkway, West Bay subdivision, State Rents number to b~ a~ign~d~ Long Cove Aced, beginning at the intersection with Woodlake Village Parkway and going eaEterly 0.05 mile to th~ int~r~ection with North Chase Road, then continuing easterly 0.~7 mile to end at Long Cov~ Ro~d, LOng COve subglvision, $ta~e Rou~a number to be assigned; North Cha~e Road~ beginning a% th~ intersection with Long COV~ Roa~ and going southerly 0.03 mile to the inter- ~ecticn with No,th Chase Court, then continuing southerly 0.17 mile to end in a cul-de-eac~ North Chase Court, beginning at the intersection with North Chas~ Road and going ~asterly 0.08 nile to tbs intersection wi=h North Chase Place, then =urning and going ~outh~rly 0.12 mite to end in a cul-de-sac; and North Chase Place, beginning at the intersection with North chase Court and going easterly 0.07 mil~ to end in a cul-de-sac. end designated Virginia Depar+-ment of Transportation drainage Thes~ roads serv~ 47 And be it farther re,elveS, that the Beard of Supervisors guarante~ to th~ Virginia D~par~ment of Txansp~rtation a 50' righ~-o£-way ~n~ all of these roads except WoodIeke Village Parkway which has a 70' right-of-way, North Chase is recorded as follows: Plat Dock ~6, Pages ~ & ~7, July 13, 1~4. Vote~ Unanim©u~ This day the County Environmental Engineer~ in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Woodlake Village Parkway in Sunrise Eluff, Clover ~ill District. Open consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes~ it is reuolved that Woodluke Village Parkway in Sunrise Bluff, Clover Hill Dis~rict, be an~ it hereby is established as a public road. And be it ~nrther re~olvad, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it here~y is requested ho take into the SecOndary System, WOodlaku Village Parkway, h~gfnning at the end of Wcodlake Village Parkway, West Bay subdivision, State Route number to be assigned, and qoing northerly 0.O~ mile to the interBection with sunrise Bi~S~ Road, then continuing northerly 0.85 mite, then turning and going w~sterly 0.06 mile to end at proposed Woodlake Village Parkway, seechwood Point subdivision. This request is inclusiv~ of th~ adjacent slope, sight and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage easements. This road serves as access to a~jaeent resld~tlal properties, ~n~ b~ it further re,elveS, th~ the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 70' right-of-way for this road. Sunrise Blnf~ i~ recorded as follows; Plat Book 50, Pages 30, D1 a 32, July 31, 1985. This day the County ~n~ironYaeDtal Engineer, in accordance with directions from thi~ ~oar~, made repor~ in writing upon hi~ examination of Woedlake Village Parkway~ We~t Bay Drlvo~ ~ay Court, West Ray Road and West Bay Place in Wast Bay, Clo~er Hill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr~ ~ullivan, secon~e~ by Mr. Mayas, ~t ~s resolved ~hat Woodlake Village Parkway, West Bay Drive, We~t Bay Court, West ~ay KQad and West Bay Place in West Bay, Clover Hill District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further r~solved, that the Virginia D~par%ment of Transportation, be end it hereby is rsquested to taks inte the Secondary System, Woodlake Village Parkway, beginning at end of WoOdlake Village Parkway, North Chase subdivision, ~tahe Route n~_~tber to be arsigne~, and going northerly 0.lQ mile to 88-71~ the intersection ~itk West Bay Drive, then continuing northerly 0.01 mile to end at Wo~dlake Village Parkway, Sunrise Bluff, State ROute number to be assigned; West Bay Drivs, beginning the intersection with Woodlake Village Parkway and going eastarty 0,13 mine %0 the intersection with West Bay Court, then continuing easterly 0.08 mile to the intersection wi~h West Bay Road, then continuing easterly 0.07 mile to the intersection with West Bay Place, then taming and going southerly 0.07 mile, then turning and going easterly 0.04 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; We~t Bay Court~ beginning at th~ intersection with West Bay Drive and going southerly 0.11 mile, then turning and going west=fly 0.07 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; West Bey Road, beginning at the intersection with West Bay Drive a~d going southerly 0.15 ~ile to end at West Bay Road, Long Cove subdivision, State Route number to be assigned; West Buy Place, beginning at the intersection with West Bay Drive and going easterly 0.06 ~i]e to end in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive of the ~djacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage These roa~ serve 61 lots. And b~ it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportahio~ at 50' right-of-way fee all of these roads except Weodlake Village Parkway which has a 70' right-of-way. West Bay is recorded a~ fellows: Plat Rook 46, Pages 100 a 1Ol, August 9, This day the County ~nvironmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Woodlake Vitlag~ Parkway and W~S% ~amch Road in West Branch, Clover Hill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Sullivan, ~econd~d by M~. Mayes, it is resolve~ that Woedlake Village Parkway and West Branch Road in West Branch, Clover Rill District, be and they hereby a~o e~tablished as publle roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, woodlake village ~arkway, beginning at the intersection with existing Woodlake Village Parkway, State Route 3600, and going westerly 0.0~ mils to the intersection with West Brauch Road, then continuing westerly 0.01 mile to end at Woodlake Village Parkway, aea~her Glen subdivision, State Route number to be assigned; and West Branch Road~ beginning at the intersection with Wccdlake Village Parkway and going southerly 0.12 mile, then turning and going westerly 0.07 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This request ia inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia D~par~nt of TransportatiOn drainag~ easements. Ahd be it iurthur resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Departmen~ of Transportation a right-of-way for Woodlake Village Parkway and a 50' right-of-way for West ~ranoh Road. West ~ranch is recorded as follows: Plat Bock 50~ Paqe~ 2~ ~ 29, July 31, 1985. This day the County Environmental Enginear~ in accordance with directions from the Board, made repot= in writing upon his examination of Willow Glen Road in Willow Glenn, Clov~r Hill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Sullivant seuended by Mr. ~aye$, it is resolved that Willow Glen Road in Willow Glenn, Clover Hill District, be and it hereby is And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Willow Glen Road, beginning a: the inter- section with existing Woedlake Villaqe Parkwayw state ROute )600, and goiDg southerly 0.04 mile to t_he intersection with Willow Glen Road, then turning and going westerly 0.17 mile, then turning and going southerly 0.04 mile, then turninq and going easterly 0.I4 mile, then turning and going northerly 0.06 ~ile to end at the intersection with itself. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, slqht distance mnd d~mignatmd Virginia Department of Transpcrtatlo~ draiuage The~e road~ ~erve 42 lots. And be it further remelved, that ehs Board Of Supervisors g~arantees to the Virginia Department of Trangportation a 30' right-of-way for this road. Willow Glsnn is re~orded as follows: Plat Rook 49, ~ages 98 & 99, July 18w 1985. Vote~ Unanimeu~ This day the County ~nvironm~ntal ~ngineer, in acserdance wi~h directions from this Seard, made repoxt in writing upon examination of ~iddl~wood Road, Middlewoed Circle Middleweed Terrace in Foundry Run~ Section 7~ MidlOthian Di~trlct, Upon consideration whereof~ and on muticn of Mr. Sullivan, ~econd~d by Mr. Mayas, it' is resolved that Middl~wood Road, Mi~dlewood Circle and ~iddlewuod Terrace in Fenndry ROad, Section 7, Midlothian District, be and they h~r~by established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take ihto the Secondary System, Middlewood Read, beginning at existinq Middlewood Road, State Route 1256, and going southerly tinuinq southerly 0.13 mile to the intersectieu with Middlewood Terrace, =hen continuing 0.01 mile to end in a deed end~ Hiddlewoud Circle, beginning at the intersection with Middle- wood Road, and go±hq easterly 0.04 mile to end in a oul-de-sao; and Middlewood Terrace, beginning at thm intmrgeetion with Middlewood Road and going easterly 0.08 mile to end in a This request is inelu$1v~ of +~he a4jaeent slope, sight distansm and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage These roa~s serve 14 lots. 85-717 And be it further resolved, that th~ Board of Supervisors gnsrantee~ to ~he Virginia Department of Tr&neportation & 50' right-of-way for all of these roads. This section of Foundry Run is recorded as follows: section 7. Plat Book 45, Pages 7 & 8, January 26, 1984. Vote: Unanimous ll.D,4. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS TO POLICE DEPARTMENT FROM DRUC I~?V~STIGATION Chief Pittman stated that during a joint drug investigation conducted by th~ Federal Drug Agency, in which Che~terfi®Id and Chesterfield received a percentage totalling $24~,106. Be a product of an illegal operation was forfeited and shared with the jurisdictions involved. On motion of Mr. sullivan, seconded b~ Mr. Mayes, the Board Police Department to be used to purchase equipment to aid in ll.D.5. ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR ~URCHASE ~F PLAYGROUND EQUIPMEN~ AT C. C. WELLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL On motion of Mr. Sullivan, ee¢onde~ by sr. Maye$, ~he Board transferred $1,800 from the Matoaca District Three Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department for the purchase oS playground equipment and surfacing material at C. C. Wells Elementary School. (It is noted said funding will sugplsmcnt the C. C. Well~ Elementary School PTA donation of approximately Vote: Unanimous t~.D.6. RESCIND ROUTE 2~ RESOLUTION ADOPTED 1988 AND ADOPT REVISED RESOLUTION M~. Sullivan stated that this action to re~cind a previous Chesterfield was supporting a western ~oute out~ide the County. ~e stated it has always been the County's con~ention ~hat a western rout= in Chesterfield was in the best interest of the of its revenue sharing highway money ($1 million} to study the County Line. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Msyss, %~h~ Bo=rd rescinded the following resolution of September ~8, 1988: "W~E~EA$, the Virginia Department of Transportation at the request of Chesterfield County and th~ Ricba]ond Regional Metropolitan Planning Organization completed an Environmental Impact Study for thc northern leg of Route ~$$ from the Powhits Parkway ~xtenslon to T-64, and WHEREAS, the Department studied o~sr 28 different locations for Route 2~8, and WREP~AS, the Department conducted the study with the utmost integrity and professionalism, and 88-718 meetings on the various locations which were studied, and hearing process, and W~E~AS. the citizens participating in the p~blic hearing for Route 28S, and of ~he gnvironmental Impact Study and the input of %h~ =itison$ WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of supervisors Tran~Dortation Board for their vision and courage in the designate the County's FY-89 Revenue Sharing Funds for the Route 28~ corridor from the Powhlts Parkway Extension to the Ches~eriield Coun~y/~owhatan County Lin~. Vote: Unanimous request of chasterfield County and the ~ichmond Kegional Metropolitan Planning Organization compI~t~d an Environntental locations ~or Route 2~8; an~ WHEREA~, over 6,~OO citizens participated in ~e public process expressed eye.helming supper% for a western corridor for rout~ 2S8 withi~ Chesterfield County; and of the Enviro~cntal Impact Study and the input of the citizens location for Koute 288; and endorses and suppor~s the Co~onweal~ Transportation ~oar~'s 88-719 Transportation Board for their vision and courage in the selection of a western corridor' for Route 288 within Chesterfield County. BR IT FURTHER RES0LV~D, that the Board of Supervisors has pledged to take ell possible m~asnr~ to ~uppeft the construction of a Weste~ Route 288 within Chesterfield C~un~y and will, therefore, designate the COunty's FY-S9 Revenue Sharing Funds for the survey and design of the Commonwealth Transportation Beard's Route 288 corridor from the Powhite Parkway ~x=ension to the' Chesterfield County/Powha=a~ County Line, Vote: Unanimous ll.D.7. O~TIOM TO ~URCHASE PROP=RTY ADJACENT TO POINT OF ~OCKS PAR~ On motion of Mr. ~ullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes~ th~ Board a9~rove~ an option agreement ~n the amount of $5,008 for the purchase of 7.51 acres of land, at a cost of $7~,0~, adjacent tO Point cf Rocks Park and authorized the County Administrator to sign said option agreement. Funds for the option are available in the 1985 Point of Rocks Bond Account. ~It is noted funds for sai~ purchase are included in the November, 1988 Bond Referend~n~.) AIRPORT OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL - PROJECT 05 On motion of Mr. Sullivan, eecen~ed by Mr. Mayee, the ~oard authorized the County A~inistrator to accept the Federal Aviation Administration and State grants, in the amount~ of $27,000 and $1,500, respectively, and enter ~nto a contract with the lowest responsible bidder and enter into nece~sar~ contract~ for th~ 19~ Airport ~mprov~J~ent ~rej~ct Obstruction Removal. ll.E. COMi~U~ITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS LIGHT INSTALLATION COST Malibn Street and Wood bal~ Ro~d, Meriden Road Bud Wood Dale Road, Rochelle Road and Wood Dale Road, ($~,3~6.$4); 1~1.536.39); and ($841.08). On motion of Mr. Cur=in, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board deferred consideration of the reques~a for street light in- stallations un~il October 26, 1988 in the Bermuda District for the following locations to determine a time frame/priority 1. Intersection of Biltr~ore Drive and Wood Dale Road~ 2. Eolly Hil~ Road and Wood Dal~ 3. 5. further, the Board approved the installation cf street light~ at the following locations, with funds to be expended from the Midlothian Magisterial District Street Light Fund: 1. I601 Greenfield Drive, 88-720 2. ~ereeotLo~ Of ~arly settlers ROad and Red Lion Plece~ Unanimous lI.E.2~ STREET LIGHT P~QBEST On motion of Mr. C~rrin, ~ecended bF Mr. Daniel, the Board approved the request for a street light s~ the intersection of East Hundred Road and Spruce AV~nU~ (~o~th side of East Hundred Road), wi~h funds ~o be expended from the Bermuda Magisterial District Street Liqht Fund. !1.~.3. ~=T DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER RESTRICTION OF THROUGH TRUCK TRAFFIC ON FALLOW DRIV~ AND DRIV~ On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the ~eard set the date of ~ovember 9, 1988 at 7~08 p.m., for a public hearing Drive and Deerfield Driv~ in the MatoaC~ ~gisterial District. Vote= Unani~ou~ ll.E.4. AUTBORIZATION TO EXECUTE LEASE/PURCHASE AGReEMeNT FOR ACQUISITION O~ A GEOGRA~H%CAL~Y-SAS~D INFOP/~ITION SYSTEM There wa~ discussion of f~nds needed each year~ the time frame, security, training pxogr~ms, maintenance agreements, spesifi- cations~ co,ts of software and hardware, et~. N~+ Hammer sta~ed detailed information would be submitted to ~he ~oard prior to the public hearing. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by ~r. Currin, the Board authorized the County A~%inlstrator to execute a lease-purchase agreement for the acquisition of a geographically-based formation system (GIS) and set the date of November 9; t988 at 7:00 p.m., for a public hearing to consider ~he appropriations cf lease-purchase proceeds. Vote: Unanimous 11.~.6. ~Flt 0RDI~A~CF TO 2LAbINiNG COMMISSION kEGARDI~G NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROBERTY OWNERS REGARDING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION P~VIEW Ms. Sale stated that the ~lanning Commission has requested that the Board consider an ordinance regarding notification e~ adjacent property owners regarding tentative $ubdivision review. There was discussion relative to citizens beinq notified, p~ecedures and cost, ~ke applican=~e opportunity to choose administrative review Or Planning Commission review, adequate staff in ~he Planning Department to handle the re~nemt, the e×i~ting workload of the Planninq Commission and the appli- On motion of ~r. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Nayes, the Board referred the ordinance %0 the 91arming Cotillion for a public hearing regarding notification of adjacent property owners for tentati=e suJodivieion approval. Ayes: Mr. Daniel. Nays: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currin and Ns. Mayas. ~8-721 ll.F.1. PUBLIC HEARING 20 CON$ID~ AN 0~DINA~CE VACATING PORTIONS OF 16 FOOT SN~R EASEMENT AND 10 FOOT · E~P0~AK¥ CO~TKUCTION BASEMENT ACROSS LOT A, ~INTERS RILL Mr. Sale ~tated thi~ date and time had he~n advertised for a public hearing %o consider an ordinance to vacate portions of a 16 foot $~wer easement and a 10 foot temporary ~onstructlon easement across LOt 17, Block A, Winter~ Hill Place. ~e stated the condition that it be done oDiy upon the extension of the sewer line as recommended be eliminated. No one was present to sDeak in favor Of Or against this Ordi- nance. There was reference to two subdivisions and the Beard tabled this request to the end of the aqenda for clarification whether cr not it was advertised correctly. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR PUBLIC WATER SERVICE ON SKYBIRD ROAD AND SKYBIRD COURT On motion of ~r. Muye$, seconded by Mr. Ceftin, the ~oard instrncted staff to meet with residents of Skybird Road to further explore their inter~st in rscelvlnq publi~ watsr to Skybird Road through an ass~ssm%nt diseriet and advis~ th~ Board of the results of said msetlnqg. vote: Unanimous 1t.F.3. CONSENT ITEMS Mr. Currln disclosed to the Board that h~ is part owner of a convenience mart which is to be built relative ~o Item ll.F.3.b~., Appomattox Industrial Bark from Oliver D. Kudy, Trustee and declared a ~onfliet of inter, st pursuant tO the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act; and further disclosed to t/~e Board that he could receive compensation in the futaxe relative to Item ll.F.~.b.4., Tarrls Lane from Oliver D. Rudy, Truste~ and declared a potential conflict of inter~t pursuant to the Virginia CemDrehen~ive Conflict of Interest Act. ~e excused himself from the me,ting. ll.F.3.b.2. APPOMATTOX INDUSTRIAL PARK FROM OLIVER D. RUUY, On motion o~ Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Bear~ containing 0.~4 acres and 3.10 acres from Oliver D. Rady, road project i~ th~ Appum~t~o~ In~ustrlal Park, au~ authurlz~d Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mu. Sullivan, Mr. Daniel and Mr. M~yes ll.F.3.b.4. TARRIS LA~ FROM OLIVER D. RUDY, TRUSTEE On motion of'Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Msyes, the Roard accepted the conveyance of a 10' strip Of land along Tetris Lane from Oliver D. Rudy, Trustee, under the provimionm of The Communit~ Grocery Trust Agreement dated November 17, 1987, and authori~ ~h~ County ~d~ini~tr~tQr to ~xecu~e the n~ce~safy deed. Ayes: Mr. Appleqate, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mayas Absent: Mr. Currin Mr. Currln returned to the meeting. ll.F.3.a. AUTHOtLIZATION FOR RIGHT OF ENTRY TO VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONVEYANCE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG ROUTE On motion of Mr. Sultivanr ~econded by Mr. Keyes, the Board approved authorization for the right of entry requested by the Virqinia Department of Transportation s~ro~s Curti~ Elementary, Chester Middle and Thomas Dale High Schools for the Route 10 widening project, authorized the County A~ministrator to execute the necessary documents and ~t the dat~ of October 26, 19S8 et 9:00 a.m. for a public hearing to consider the con- V~ya~oe of th~ right of way and further that the proceed~ be deposited in tho Revenue Sharing Road Projects Fund. l!.F.3.a.2, kLONG BOPKZNS On motion cf ~r. Sullivan, seconded by ~r. ~aye~, the Board ~pproved authorization for the fight of ~ntfy f~q~eSted by the Virginia Department of Transportation across Bopkiue and ~eulah Elementary Schools for the road improvement projects along Hopkins Road, authorized the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents and set the date of October 26, 1988 at 9:00 a.m. for a public hearing to consider the conveyance of the right of way and further that the proceeds be deposited in the Revenue Sharing Road Projects Fu~d. ACCEPTANCE OF DEEDS OF DEDICATION BOULDERS VI~ DRIVE A~D BOULDERS VIEW LANE FROM SIG~LA CJ ASSOCIATES AND FETULA ASSOCIATES, LTD. · On motion ef Mr. Sullivan, ~econded by Mr. Mayer, the Board accepted =he conveyance of Boul~er~ View Drive ~u~ Boulder~ View Lane from Sigma CJ Associate~ A Virginia Limited Part- nership and Pet~la Associates, LTD., An iowa Corporation, and authorized the County A~ministrator to e~ecute the necessary deed. (A copy of the plat is filed with the ~apers Qf this BOard.] Vote: Unanimous 11.P.3.b.3. GOODES BRIDGE ROAD FROM GEORGE G. EGERTON AND JOHN On motion of Nr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board accepted the conveyance of a 15' strip of land along Good~ Bridq~ Road from Mr. George G. Egerton and Mr. John L. Irvin, and authorized the County Administrator to ex,cute the of this Board.} Sole preeented tho Board with a report on the developer water and sewer contract~ e×ecut~d by th~ COunty Admlnlstr~tQr. ll.G. REPORTS Mr. Ramsey pre~ented the Board with a statu~ General Fund Con~ing~n=y Account, General Fund Reserve Fund~ District Road and Street Light Purchases and School Board Agenda. report on the Balance, ~oad Mr. Ra~ey sta~d %he Virginia Department of Transportation has formally notified the County of the acceptance and/or abandon- ments of th~ ~ollowimg roa~s into/~rom the State Secondary ADDITIONS LENGTH 0.06 mi. Se=tlon 2 e~ new location Route 815 SALISBURY, SECTION C: /2tKEVIEW, SECTION 2 Route 1069 (Chalkwell Drive} - From Route 1019 to a Southeast cul-de-sac 0.24 mi, Route 3601 (Forest Wood Court) to a Southwest cul-de-sac - From Route 3602 0.05 mi. QUEENSPAR~ - S~CTTON A-1 Route 832 (~obious Crossing Drive) ~ From 0.60 mile No~th of Route 711 to 0.94 mile North of Route 711 Route 4080 (Castlestone Road) - From Route 815 to Route 4081 Route 40~1 (Castle Hill Road) - From 0.03 mile North to Route 4080 to a Sout~h cul-de-sac 0.34 mi. 0.2.t mi. 0.1~ mi. SACHEM'S HEAD ~ PHASE TWO Route ~750 [Water willow Drive) - From 0.11 mile Southwest of Route 3752 to 0.01 mile South of Route 37~9 0.03 mi. Route 37~9 (spring Cress Court) - From Route 5750 to ~n Fast cul-de-sac 0.10 Di. ~ANDONMENT Section 1 of old location Route $15 0.08 mi. ll.F.1. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE VACATING PORTIONS OF 16 FOOT SEWER EASEMENT AND lO FOOT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 17, BLOC~ A, WINTERS MILL PLACE Mr, S~le stated tki$ date and time had been advertised for a publi~ hearing to consider an ordinance to vacate portions ~f a 16 foot sewer eosement and a 10 foot temporary construction easement across Lot 17, Blo=k A, Winters ~ill Plaoe and hkat the ordinance had been advertiaed correctly. He added ~urther the c~nditlon %hat the vaeatiou be acoomplishe~ b~$~d upon the No on~ ¢~me forward to s~ak in favor of or against the prO- posed ordinance. On motion of Mr. Applegato, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board adopted the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE to vacate portions of a 16' permanent sewer easement and a 10' temporary construction easement across Lot 17, Block A, winters Bill Place, Clover Bill District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, ~ shown on a plat thereof duly recorded in the Clerk's Office cf the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in Plat Book 55~ Page 64. WHEREAS, Bodie, Taylor and Puryear, Inc., agent for Julian visors of Chesterfield County, Virqinia to vacate portions of a eaoement aOro~s Lo% 17~ Block A~ Wintern ~ill Plaee~ Clover Bill District, Chesterfield County, Virginia mere particularly shcw~ On a plat of recO~d in £he Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of said County in Plat Book 55, ~age 64, made by Bodie, Taylor and Pure, ar, Inc., dated May 19, 1986. ~h~ portions of the easements petitioned to be vacated are more fully described as follows: Portions of a 16' permanent sewer eas~men~ and a 10~ temporary construction easement acro~g Lot 17~ Block A, Wint~rg Bill Place, the location of which is more ~ully shown on a plat mad~ by Bodie~ Taylor and Pury~ar~ Inc., dated May 11, 1988, a snpy of which i~ Ordinance. W~EREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section ~5~1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by adv~r- tiging; and the portions of the easements sought ~o be vacated. OF CHESTE~IELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA: Thaa pursuant to Section 15.1-4~2{b) of the Code of ~, 19S0, as ~end~d, khe aforesaid po~tion~ of ea~ment~ be and are hereby vacated. This Ordinance ~hall be in full force end effect in accordance with Section 15.1-482(b) of the cods of ~950~ as ~nd~d, and a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the plat a~tached hereto shall be recorded no sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Offic~ of the Circuit Court of che~erfield~ V~rqinia pursuant to section The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to S~ction 15.1-483 is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of the portion of the plat vacated. This Ordinance ~hall ve~t simple title of the portions of the easements hereby vacated in the property owner of the lot within Wint~r~ Hill ~la¢~ and clear of any right~ of public use. Acco~dingly~ thi~ Ordinance ~hall be indexed in the of the County of Chesterfield, as grantor, and Julian D. and Rend= V. Burleigh, or their successors in rift=, us grantee. Vote: Unanimous 88-725 9.A. CONSIDER REQUEST FROM SPRING TR~CE A$$0CIAT~S FOR AID IN ACQUIRING A SEWER E__~ME~T ACROSS PROPERTY OF MRS. LAVELETTE ~. ~ENE¥ Mr. Applegate stated the Board had tabled consideration of this the chaDging cf ownership, the attempts to obtain easement~, safety and welfare i~su~s', etc. ~r. Applegat~'inquir~d if thi~ land in the vicinity of ~irkdale and he did not want. to have a ADplegate referred =o was located Considerably west o~ this property. Mr. Mayes made a me,ion, ~conde~ by Mr. Daniel, to deny the request from Spring Trace As~eciate~ for aid in acquiring a sewer easement across the property of Mrs. Lavelmtte G. Henry. Nays: Mr. Applegate~ M~. S~Itivan and Mr. Currin. on motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the BoaFd authorized the Right-of-Way Maaager to aid Spring Trace As- Mrs. Lavel~tto G. ~enry and authorized tko County Attornay to begin condenu~ation proceedings to gain right of entry for the Ayes: Mr. Applegate, ~r. Sullivan, Mr. Currin and Mr. Daniel. ll.K. EXECUTIVE SESSION On motion cf Mr. Sullivan~ ~econded by Mr. Currin~ the Board regarding Rohbinm vermum WemseI an~ potential litiqatien involving Route 288 pursuant ~o Section 2.1-344(a) (6} of the Cod~ of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Vote~ Unanimous 11~40 a.m. to trav~l to John Howlett~s 1I.I. REQUESTS FOR MOBILE HOME PERMITS In Dala Magisterial District, ~IFFOI{D W. C;~fI~ER requested property fronting the somt~east line of Bill Road, approxi- mately 1310 feet southwest of Canute Drive and bettmr known as 6725 Hill Road. Tax Map 65-8 (21 Ampthill Gardens, Section 2, tot 33 (~he~t 22). Th~ first pez~mi~ wa~ issued on August I4, 1974. Mr. Jacobsen stated staff recommended approval of Case ~SZR0~lt, subject to certain standard conditions. Mr. Clifford W. Carter stated the recommended conditions were acceptable. There was ne o~poeitisn present. Mr. Daniel stated he customarily preferred to review mobile home requests within five (5) year timefr~mes versus seven (7) year time- frames because of the potential for future residential develop~ ment in certain areas of the County; however, he felt thim request warranted a seven 17) year approval. On motion of Mr, Daniel, ~econded by Mr. Mayas, the Board approved Case 88SR02t5 for seven (7) years, subject to the following standard conditions: 1. The applicant shall he the owner and occupant of the mobile home. No lot or parcel may be rented or l~ased for u~e ~$ a mobile hems site, nor shall any mobile home be used for rental property. Only one (t} mobile hQ~e ~hall be permitted to be parke~ on an individual lot ~r parcel. 3. The minimum lot size, yard metbackm~ required front yard, an~ other zcniD~ requirements of the applicable zoning district shall be complied with, except that no mobile home shall be locatmd closmr than 20 ~eet to any existing r~sidenoe. 4. No additional permanent-type living ~pace may be added onto a mobile home. All mobile hom~s shall be skirted but shall not be placed on a ~r~anent foundation. 5. Where public {County) wate~ and/or ~wer are available, they ~hall be u~ed. 6. Upon being grante~ a ~obile Home Permit, the applican= shall then obtain the necessary permits from the Office of the Building Official. This shall be done prior to the installation or r~location of the ~obile home. 7. Any violation of the above condition~ ~hall be grounds for revocation of the Mobile Home Permit. Tote: ~8SR0216 In Dermuda Magisterial DistrAct, W~LLIAM AND H~NNAH DAVIS requested renewal of Mobile Home Permit 83MRt30 to park a mobil~ home on propert~ fronting the west lin~ e£ 01~ tion Road, approximately 3~ feet north cf Drewry Bluff Read an~ b~t~r knowu a~ 7016 Old ~lanta~ion Road. Tax Map 67-~ Parcel 32 (Sheet 23). The fi~$t permit was i~sued on November 12, 1975. ~r. Jacobsen stated staff resommanded approval of Ca~e 88SR0216, subject to certain standard conditions. Mr. William Davis stated the recommended condition~ ~re acceptable. There was no opposition present. On motion of ~r. currin, seconded b~ ~r. Sullivan, the Board approved Case SSSR02t6 for seven (7) y~ar$, mubj~ct to the following standard conditions: 88-727 1. The applicant stall be the owner and occupant of the mobile home. 2. No lot or parcel may be rented or leased ior use as a mobile home site, nor shalI any mobile home be used for rental property. 0nly one (i) mobile hom~ ~hall he pmrmitted to be parked on an individual lot or parcel. 3. Th~ minimum lo~ size, yard setbacks, required front yard, and other zoning requlrementm of th~ applicable zoning district shall be complied with, except that no mobile hom~ mhmll be located ctom~r than 20 feet to any existing residence. 4. Bo additional permanent-type living space may be added onto a mobile home. Ail mobile homes shall b~ skirted buC Where public (county) water and/or ~we~ ace available, they shall be used. 5. Upon being granted a Mobile Home ~ermit, the applicant 8hail then obtain the necessary permit~ from the ©ffic~ of the Building Official. This shall be dona prior to the installation or relocation of the mobile home, 7. Any violation of the above conditions shall be groundm for revocation of the Mobile Home Permit, Unanimous 88SR0217 In Bermuda Magisterial Di~trio%, ~ C. ~4D~G~/~ /equested renewal oC Mobile Home Permib 838135 to park a mobile home on property fronting the southwest line of ~rightwocd Avenue, approximately 120 feet south of V~lda Road and better known as 10110 Brightwood Avenue. Tax Map 97-4 (2) Central Park, Block 13, Lots ~0-A3 {Sheet 32}. The fir~t permit was issued on August 24, 1983. Mr. Jacobsen stated staff recommended approval of Case 888R0217, subject to certain standard condition~. Ms. Dabble Whitker, representin~ th~ applicant, stated the reeom~en~od conditions were auceptable. There was no opposi- tion present. On motion of Mr. Currln, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board approved Ca~e 88SR0217 for seven ~7) years~ subject to the followlnq standard conditions: 1. The applisan~ sh~ll be the owner and occupant of the mobile home. 2. No let or parcel may be rented or leased for use as a mobile home site, nor shall any mobile home be used for rental property. Only one (1) mobile hoiae shall be permitted to be parked on an individual lot or parcel. 3. Yhe minimum lo~ size, yard setbacks, r~quired front yard, end other zoning requir~ment~ cf the applicable zoning district shall be complied with, except that no mobile home ~hall be located closer ~han ~0 feet to any existing residence. Nu a~itional permanent-type living space may be added onto a mobile home. Ail mobile homes ~hall be skirted but shall not bo placed on a permanent foundation, ~. where public (County) water end/or sewer are available, they shall be used. 6. Upon being granted a Mobile rome Permit, the applicant shall then obtain the necessary permits from the Office of the ~uil~ing Official. Thi~ shall be done prior to tko installation or relocation of the mobile home. Any violation cf the above conditions shall be grounds for revocation o£ the Mobile Home ~ermit. 88SR02t8 In Matoaca Magisterial District, ~ L. ~ROIF~ requested renewal o5 Mobile Home Permit S3S174 to park a mobile home on property fronting the west line of Franklin Avenue, approximately 600 ~oet no,th of River Road and ~etter known as 21310 Franklin Avenue. Tax Map 180-1§ (2) Radcllff, Block F, LOt 5 (Sheet 52). The firs~ permit was issued on september 28, 1983. Mr. ~acobson stated staff race--ended approval of Case 88SR0218, subject to certain standard conditions. Mr. Gary L. Groux stated the race--ended condition~ were On motion of Mr. M~yes, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board approved Case 88SR0218 ~or seven (7) year~, ~ubj~ct to the following standard conditions: 1. The applicant shall be the owne~ and OcCupan~ of the mobile home. 2. No lob or parcel may be rented or tea~ed fo~ use as a mobile hems site, ncr shall aDy mobile home be used for rental property. Only one [1) mobile home shall be permit=ed ~o be parked on an individual lot or parcel. 3. The minim%un lot sics, yard setbacks, requise~ feon~ yard, and other zoning requirements of th~ applicable zoning district shall be complied w~th, except that no mobile home shall be located closer than 20 feet to any existing residence. 4. No additional parmanent~type living space may be added onto a mobile home. Ail mob£1e hom,s shall be skirte~ but shall no__tbs placed On a permanent foundation. 5. Where public (County) water and/or sewer are aveilable~ they shall be used. 6. Upon ~eing granted a Mc~ile Home Permit, ths applicant the Building Official. Thi~ ~hall be ~one prior to the installation or relocation of the mobile home. 7. Any violation of the above eenditi0ns shall be grounds for ll.J. RE~DNINQ REQUESTS Mr. Applegate stated there were a number of p~opl~ from ~e ~randsrmi11 Woods oommunity present who were interested in Case 88SN0143 end requested that it be h~ard out of sequence. The Board agreed to hear Case 88SN0143 out of s~quence. 88-729 ~equest~ am~ndm~n~ to Conditlo~al Uae Planned Development~ (cases 745021, 83S202, and 85s113} to permi~ use e~oeptions, exception to the number of required parking ~pace~, and commercial access through ra~idential%y zoned property. A restaurant is planned. This request li~s in a Residential (R-7) Die,rio% on a .27.9 ao~e parcel fronting approximately 1,750 feet on the south line of O1~ ~Dndr~d Road, also frontiug approximately 465 feat on the west l~ne of Brandermill Parkway, and located in th~ $Ou~hWe~ quadrant of the intersection cf these roads. Tax Map 36-10 (1) Parcel 1 (Sheet 13}. Mr. Jacobean stated the Planning Commission recommended denial oi the request for exoeDti0ns to the r~quired number of parking spaces and approval of a use exception and the exception to permit commercial access through a residential dis~ri~t, sub,eot to certain conditions. Mr. Applegate disclosed to the Board that he is closely associated with the Srandermill retirement community, declared a conflict of interest pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensiv~ race--ended conditions were acc~ptabl~. There was no present in favor of tSs request. denied the request ~or exceptions to the required nu~er to permit co~ercial access ahrough a residential district, ~ubj~et tO th~ following conditions: cl~house shall be limited to th~ following residents of Brande~ill, Brand~rmill Wood~ and and their g~zts~ employees o~ the owner of Brandermill Woods and their guests; employees of the Brande~ill Woods guests. The te~ "~ests" a~ u~d above ~hall include individual~, club~, orgaDizalion$, and groups. (CPC) 2, ~arklng loc~te~ along Standstill Woods Trail shall eliminated. (CPC) 3. Hourm of operation shall be limited ~o between 7~00 and 10~00 p.m., S~nday ~rough Thursday add between a.m. ~nd 11~00 p.m., Friday and Saturday, (CPC~ ~his Conditional U~ Planned Development shall be granted for a period no= =o exceed thre% (3} year~ from date approval. (CPC) Ayes: Mr. ~ulllvan, Er. Currin, ~r. Daniel and Nr. Mr. ADplegat~ returned to the meeting. 88SN0059 (~m~nded) In Midlothian Magi~terlel District, MID~IA~ ENTE~PRISES, INC. AND LAV~ER INTeReSTS requested rezoning from Residential (R-7) to Office Business (O) Of 7.0 acres, plus amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development (case ~6S~25) to permit use and bulk exceptions on this tract, on an adjacent 59.0 acr~ zoned Office B~siness (O). A mixsd =se development, to include residential, office, commercial, and p=blic/semi-p=blic uses, is planned. This request lies on two (2) parcels of land for a total Of 81.5 acres, the first parcel containing 66.0 acres fronting approximately 2,750 feet on the north line of 01d Hundred Road, measured from a pein% approximately 600 feet west of Brandermill Parkway; and the second parcel containing 15.5 acres ~ronting approximately 1,0O0 feet on %he west line of Coalfield Road across from Miners Trail Road. Tax Map 36 (1) Part of Parcel S and Tax Map 36-7 (L) Part e~ Parcel 1 (sheet Mr. Jacobso~ stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of Case 85SN0059, subject to certain conditions; however, due to the recent decision on the proposed alignment for Route 288 north of the Powhite Parkway, there are significant changes an~ redesign Dee~e~ on t~his project and ~taff recommended that this case be remanded to the Planning Commission for further review. ~r. Jim Haye~, representing the applicants, stated the staff ~ommendat±cn was acceptable. There was no opposition present. 0n mo~on of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currln, the Board rem~nded Case 88SN8059 to the Planning Commission for review and a recommendation on a revised request. In Matoaca Magisterial Dishriet~ IRVIN G. HORNER requested Conditional Use to permit a land~ill in an Agricultural b~etriet on a 55 + acre parcel fronting approximately 40 feet on the south line ~f ~ull Street Road, approximately 3,000 feet west of ~kinq~arter Road. Tax Map 7~ (1) Part of Parcels 15 and 16 (sheets 18 and 27). Mr. Jacobsen stated the applicant has requested a thirty day deferral of Case ~S~0O5; however, staff r~eo~ndm a sixty (60) day deferral to allow evaluation of this particular request with respect ~o the recently ~opte~ policy on ~gbri~ landfills. Mr, Bob Roop, represeotinq the applicant~ stated this case has been deferred ~everal times; the applicant feels Chat rumainin~ p~oblems can be resolved within a thirty 130) da~ timeframe; and requested a thirty (30) day instead of sixty Mr. George Beadles, Jr. voiced Opposition to any deferral of Mr. Mayss stated %hat when this application was initiated the Planning Coati, sion, as well as staff~ race--ended denial. He offered proffered conditions relative to liners which staff felt were acceptable and =hey then recommended approval. He sta%e~, mince that time, the Debris Landfill Study, which was presented to an~ adopted by th~ Board, and new regula- ~ions/stand~r~ implemented by ~he Department of Wamt~ Manage- v~rmus th~ standards of the Department of Waste Management and ~he Debris Landfill Study, as well as the fact tkat the ~lan- sing Cotillion did not hav~ the benefit of ~uch information when it reviewed ~hi~ request, he was prepared ~o move for denial of thi~ request; howeve~ ~hould the denial not be approved, he felt ~h~ r~qu~t ~hQuld be sent back to the Planning Commission for further review in light of the new Stat~ and County standards. There were conserns raised regarding a t~ir~y (30) day deferral versn~ a sixty (60) day deferral and the Board qeneially agreed that a forty-fiv~ (45) day deferral would be mere beneficial te all eonserned. After further discussion, it was on motion of ~r~ Mayer, 88S005 until November 9, 1988~ at 7:00 p.m. Mr. Mayes thanked those citizens who attended th~ ~ting regarding Cede 88S005. i~ Midlothian Magisterial District, CONTEL CELlULAr, INC. requested Conditional Use Planned Dewelopment to permit a 198 foot tower plus bulk (setback) exceptions in a Convenience Business ~B-1) District. Thi~ ~e~uezt lie9 on & 0~2 acre parcel fronting approximately 40 feet on the west llne of Buford Eoad, approximately 500 feet north of Midlothian Turnpike. Tax ~mp 1~-~ (1) Part of Parcel 16 (Shee~ $). Mr. Jacobsen stated, at the September 20, 19~8 meeting, the Planning Commission deferred consideration of Case 88SN0~63 until November 1~, 1988 to allow time for fhe Planning Com- mission and the Beard of Supervisors to oon~id~r an alternative site at their October mestlngs; therefore, it would be appro- priate for the Board to defer action ~n this case until ~ovember 23, 1988. Mr. Jim Theobold, re~resentinq th~ applicant, stated the deferral wa~ acceptabl~. There was no opposition to the deferral. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Coffin, the Board deferred consideration of Case 88S~006~ until November ~3, 1988. In Mateaca Magisterial District, SHOOiHITH B~OTH~P~, requested Conditional Ume Planned D~velopmmnt to allow two roorcatlonal vehicles to be use~ a~ living quaster~ in an Agricultural (A) District on a 0.5 acre parcel lying approxi- mately 500 f~et off the ~outh line of Iron Bridge Roa~ and ap- proximately 60 ~eet off the east llne of 5owls Road. Tax Map 114-9 (1} Part of Parcel 4 (Sheet Mr. Jacobsen stated the applicant requested a si~ty ~60) day deferral. Mr. Oliver Rudy, representing the applicant, stated ~he deferral was requested to await a decision on an appeal pending before the County B~il~iog Code Appeals ~eard to determine whether cr not the subject trailers conform to the uniform itatewide ~nildinq Ce~e; however, the Appeals ~oard deferred the appeal for thirty (3~) day~ to permit the Building Inspec- tor to make further inspection to deterl~ine if the subject traiter~ could be brought into conformity with that Cod~. Ms. Kay Robertson stated thi~ request ha~ beep deferred by the Planning Commission on four previous occasions; voiced opposi- tion to the proposed request because the request ix in viola- tiOn of its conditions of =cuing, the trailera are un[]iqhtly and illegally parked; steted if employees are to b~ housed on the job site, then appxepriate accom~edatlona that comply with the Zoning Ordinance should be provided for them; and stated she would prefer net to see any ~dditional deferrals approved. Mr. George Beadles, Jr. voiced epposition to the request for a sixty (60} day deferral as he felt the reqUeSt ~hould be approved. There was discussion relative to whether or not Cast 88S002 complied with the Uniform Storewide Building Code; whether ur not the request should be remanded to the Planning Commission for further review Or deferred; etc. Nhen aske~, Mr. Micas stated it would b~ difflcul% to render an appropriat~ land u~e decision on this request until Such time as there was a decision a~ tO wh~t could or could ~ef be constructed on the site. Mr. Daniel suggested the case be deferred for thirty (30) days. Mr. Maye$ statpd he woul~ not make a motion for a deferral deferred consideration of Case 855002 until october 26, 1988. Vote: Unanimous In Clover Bill Magisterial District, requested amendment to Conditional Use Planned Developments (Cases 74S021 and 85S~02) to permit use excsptions. A chopping center is plan~ed. This request lies in Residential office Business (O) r and Light Industrial (M-l) Districts on a 53.0 acre parcel fronting approximatel~ 2,856 feet on the no~th line of Mull Street Road, also fronting approximately 2,44~ feet on the ~o~thwest line of Harbour Points Parkway, and located in the northwest quadrant of the iutereection of these road~. Tax Map 61-16 (1} Parcel 2 and Part of Parcels 1 and 5 (Skeet Mr. Jacobsen stated the applicant requested a thirty (30} day deferral. Mr. Jim Theebold was pre~ent to represent the applicant. Mr. Ed Jennings, e resident of Harbour Points, stated h~ wa~ not in opposition :e the ~hir=y (30) day deferral but requested that the Board give COnSideration to the deferral being post- poned to an evening meeting so more interested citizens could he present. Mr. Applegate stated that he would kike to acoonunodate th~ reques~ but, due to the Board's meeting sohedute~ he could ~e stated, however, he would be available to meet with the citizens prior to the Board meeting to discuss their concerns. On motion of xr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board deferred consideration of Case §~$N0045 un%il October 26, 1988. Vote: Unanimou[] 885N0055 In M~toaca Maqistarial District, JAMES E. COL~ requested ~ezoni~g from Agricultural (A~ Co Residential (R-15). A single f~mily re~identiaI subdivision i~ planned. This request lies $$-733 on a 132.0 acre parcel lying at the northern terminus of Rockyrun Road, and northeast of the intersection of Glebe Point and Bradley Bridge Roads. T~x Map 131-I5 (1) Parcel 1 (Sheet 40). Mr. Jacobsen stated the appliaant requested a thirty {30) day deferral. Mr. Currin dimclomed tO ~he Board that his company has pre- sented a contract on the adjacent properly, declared a po- tential conflict of interest pursuant to the Virginia Com- prehensive Conflict of Interest Act and excumed himself from the mmmting. Nc one came forward to represent the request. There was opposition %o a d~ferrat. It was generally agreed to place Case 88SN005~, ~AMES E. COL~, in its proper sequence on the agenda. Mr. Apple~ate ~q~est~d that the applicant he notified that the case would be heard at a later time during the meet- Lng. Mr. Applegats stated the repreeenta%ive for Case 8~SN0065, RDF ASSOCIATES, ha~ requeste~ a thirty (30) day deferral. Mr. Willia~ R. Cawthorn ~tated he had discussed this matter with ~r. Sullivan prior to the meeting and, he ~till wished to request ~ thirty (30) day deferral, although ~r, ~llivaD ha~ indicated he preferred %0 proceed with the case. There was opposition present to the request for a deferral. It was generally agreed to place Ca~e 888N0065, R~F ASSOCIATES, in its In Bermuda Magisterial District, ~ER%'~N ~ ~ PRICE re- guested rezonlng {rom Community Business (B-2) to General Business (B-3). This reguest lie~ on a 0.9 aer~ parcel front- ing approximately 148 feet on the west llne of Jefferson Davis Highway, also fronting approximately 13~ feet on P~rrymon~ Road, and located approximately 710 feet north of willie Road~ Tax Map 81-g (1) Parcel I~ (Eheet 25} , Mr. Jacobsen $~ated the Planning Commission recommended approval of Caee 88SN0983, subject to a single condition and acceptance of the proffered conditions. Mr. Murvin Price stated ~he recommended condition was accept- able. There was no opposition pFu~ent. On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by ~r. 8ulliYan, the Board approved Case 8~SNOOE~, subject to thc following condition: k fifteen {15) foot buffer shall be maintained along P~rrymont Road. Also, all outdoor storage areas shall be ~u~fare~ eo a~ to ecrean their view from adjacent properties and public right~ of way. Other than lands0aping and/or fencing, there shall be no faciliti~ p~rmitt~d in the fifteen (]~) foot bu~er along Perrymont Road, In conjunction with final site plan review, a plan depicting these re- quirements shall be submitted to ~he Planning Depart- ment for appxoval. (P) And further, the Board accepted the following proffered cendi- 1. No portion of a building eenPtfuCbed of unadorned cinder block or corrugated and/or shee~ metal shall be visible from any adjoining ~euidantial property or any public right of w~y. ~echanical equipment, whether ground-level or rooftop, shall be shielded and eereened from public view and designed to be perceived as an integral part of the building. 2. There shall be no billboards permitted on this site. All sxterior lights shall be arranged and installed sn that the direct or reflected illumination does not exceed 0.5 foot candles above background meaeured at the lot line of any adjoining residential er agricultural parcel. Lighting standards shall be of e direeti0nal type capable o£ shielding the light source from direct view from any ad~eining residential or agricultural parcel and public right of way. Sign Districts. 5. Landscaping shall b~ provided within the required setback along Jefferson Davis Highway, except where driveways or other opening~ may be necessary. Landscaping shall con- sist cf deciduous and/or evergreen t~ees, shru~s and ground co.er. In conjunction with final site plan re¥iew~ a detailed landscepinq plan depisting this requirement shell be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. 6. Driveways and ~arking areas shall be paved with concrete, bituminous concrete, or other ~imi]ar material, Surface treated parkin~ arsas and drives shall be prohibited. perimeter of all driveways and parkin~ area~. 883N0093 In Midlothian Magisterial District, T~ A~T 6R%~49h~ re- quested rezoning from Agricultural (A} to Residential (R-9) . A ~ingt~ family r~idential ~u~division i~ planne~. This request lles on a 3.5 acre parcel located at the eastern terminus of Coralberry Way, Tax Map ~7-9 (1) Parcel i (Sheet ~). ~r. JacobSen ~tat~d th~ ~la~ning Commission reeu~end~d approval o~ sase 88SN0093. Mr. Meaty Lewis~ representing the applicant, stated the recom- mendation was acceptable. There was no uppesi~ion prssant. On motion of ~r. ~ullivaa, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board approved Case 85B~0093. Vote: UnanimOus Mr. Currin stated that he wished the record to real.ct that when C~s~ 88SN0065, RDF /%~OCIAT~S, which wa~ discussed durin~ his absencm, is presented to the Board for conmideration lmte~ during the meeting, it would be necessary.~or him to declare a conflict of interest pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act relative to that case. In Midlethian ~agisterial District, WILLIAM ~ JON~ re- quested amendment to Cokditional Uae Planned D%velopment (Case ~45060) relative to buffers. This request lies in Agricultural (A) ~ Residential (R-7), Residential (K-9), and Light Industrial (M-l) DistrActs on a 33.0 acre parcel lying approximately ~eet of~ the south line of Midlothian Turnpike, measured from point approximately 500 fe~t west of Rount Pis~ah Drive. Tax ~ap 15-16 {1) Parcel 16 and Tax Nap t6-13 (1) Parcels 2 and Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recommended apprOVal of Case 88SN0125, subject to certain Mr. John Henson, representing the applicant, stated the recom- Mr. Applsgate disclosed to the Hoard that one of his associates is involved in the potential cate of the ~ubject declared a conflict of interest pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive COnflict of Interest Act and excused himself from the meeting. on motion of Mr. Sullivan, seoonde~ by Mr. Mayas, the Hoard approved Case 88SN0125, subject to the the following condi- klans: 1. A ten (10) foot high chain link fence shall be installed and maintained between the eastern boundary of the Midlo- thian Middle School athletic field and the riqht of way for the proposed north/soUth public road. A plan depict- ing this requirement Bhall be ~ubmitted to the Planning Department ~or approval in conjunction with the first site plan review for any development with access to this right of way, and the fence shall be installed prior to any traffic utilizing this right of way. [P&CPC) 2. Public water shall be used. In con~unction with the first s~h~matio plan review for any use~ a conceptual plan of the water distribution system for the entire property shall be submitted to the Utilities Department fo~ review and aDproval, Required water demands, to include antie~ ipated flow and p~essure9 for demestic and fire flow needs, shall be provided for all uses. Additional con- ditioo~, relativ~ to line sizes and system connection points, may he impo~ed in conjunction with schematic plan approval. Public sewer shall be used. In conjunction with the first ~ch~ati~ plan r~view for any us~, the anticipated ~ewage ~lows ~or all uses shall be provided ~o the utilities Department. Ayes: ~r. ~nllivan, Mr. Currin, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mayas, Absent~ Mr~ Apple~ete~ Mr. Applegate returned to the meeting. 85SN012~ in Midlothian Magisterial District, ~IMOg~Y CARTE~ B~ r~uest~d Conditional Use to permit a two-family dwelling in a Resi~entlal (E-~5) District on a 0.8 acre parcel ~runtlng approximately ]50 feet on the west line of Winterfield Road, approximately ~00 feet south of ~ichael Ridge Road. Tax Map 1-13 (4) Sallsbury'Nills, ~ection 1, Block B, Lot 12 (Sheet 2). Mr. Jacobean stated th~ Planning Cont~i~ion r~commended approval of Cage 88SN0126 and acceptance of the proffered conditions. Mr. Timothy C. Brown stated th~ reco~endation was acceptable. On mo=ion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, ~he soard approved Case 88SN0126 and accepted the following p~offered conditions: 88-736 1. Occupancy of the second dwelling unit shall be limited to time shall the second dwelling unit be rented or sold as a Separate use, unless and until the lot is rezone~ to permit such renting or sale. 2. Plier to issuance of an occupancy permit, .the applicant shall record a deed restriction indicating the requirement in condition 1. 3. This use shall r%n with the land. Public water shall be used. The applicant shall request in writing tQ the Department of Utilit±e~ a waiver of Sestion 2O-1.29 of the Ordinance which requires separate water service connections for each dwelling unit. Any waiver granted will apply to the property owners. If subsequent property owners de not nection$ as require~ by the Code. owner, the water service lines shall be disconnected se unit. fo~ ~he propoped ~e~ond dwelling ~nit; the e~isting prop- erty owner's address and mailbox shall be ~tiIized. 8. The property owner shall no~ request a separate driveway rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-25). A single family residential subdivision is planned. Thi~ request l~e~ on a ~7 acre parsel lying approximately 930 fee% off 220 feet off the nortkwe~ line of ~etherfield Drive, apprexi- ~atmly ltl20 feet we~t of Winterfield Road. Tax Map 6 Parcels 12~ 14, 15, and 17; Tax Map 6-12 (1) Parcel 2~ Tax Map 7-1 (1) Part of Parcel 3~ and Tax Map 7-5 (1) Parcel 4 1 and 2). ~r. Jaoobson ~tated the Planning Commission recommended conditions. ~r. Joseph Owen, representing the applicant, stated =he o~ approximately five (5) acres (designated as Tax Map 6, Parcel 14), and the applicant wished to withdraw that of the land from consideration. 88-737 routinely become involved in matters concerning title question~ in a land u~e situation. A representative from Lawyers Title, voiced objection to any land use d~cislon affecting this portion of the property and requested that this portion be witSdrawn from ~he zoning request as it is not known at this time who the record title held~r may be or what that p~rson might want to do with the property. Mr. Bill Axsell, representing the residents of N~th~rf±eld Drive, ~[at~d that the requested ~ezoning is consistent with the land use plan and the adjoining r~sid~ntiat use and con- serried area residents have no objection to the u~e of the property a~ a residential singl~-family development. Ee stated ~equest=d that no access bs allowed from the nuhj~ct property to Netherfield Drive. ~e stated that similar conditions have north/south collector road would be the primary access. Re was not designed to carry in e~cess of 2,300 vehicular trips daily. ~ requested the Board deny any ~ccess from the subject property tn Netherfleld Drive. There was ~urther discussion relative to a north/south col- leceof ro~d, conditions, acceptance of proffers, etc. Board in opposition to the proposed r~quest. She expressed ping fat school bn$~ mtub roads, unrestricted growth, etc., eno requested that the residents be notified of any changes that would affect their neighborhood. She stated she under- stead that a portion of the probated ~ite may be neede~ by the COUnty for a school site. She stated information from Virginia Department of Transportation indicates that two {2] traffic studies have been conducted for this area and 85% of the motorists traveling W~nterfield Road between salipbury Road and Midlotkian Turnpik~ were traveling i0 miles er more in ~xeess of the permitted speed limits. Ms. Carolyn Power~ r~p~epenting the Salisbury Civic Associa~ tion, ~×pr~e$pd concerns relative ~e the flow of tsaffia away from the residential area~ requested that a ~ond~On for r~zoning include ~he requirement that a earth/south collector roa~ be con~truct~d prior to any development of the property; roa~ and ~tate~ the eaiscing traffic p~Oblums on Winterfiald Road and Salisbury Road need i~edia~e attention. There w~r~ approximately twenty-five (25) citizens present in opposi~ion to %he pzopoucd request. There was further di~cu~on relative to the stub road policy~ traffic condltlons~ h~alth, safety ~RO welfare issues, school Mr. Sullivan expressed apD~eciation to th= citizens for their sorting c~e bu~ =he Planning Co--lesion could ~re~ them through ~ubdivision approval. H~ advised that th~ applicant h~ proffered several con~itluns relative to their intent involve th~ co~unity ~n the r~view of their subdivision r~quest and, wi~h the inclusion of ~hes8 proffers, he felt the neighberhood co~cerns ~outd be adequately addressed. 88-7~8 approved Case 88S~0069 and conditions~ 1. 2. 4J seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board accepted the follewlng profferad Average let square footage: 40,000 square feet. Minimum let square footaga~ 30,000 squ~re feet. With regard to s~bdivision approval and procedures, the developer will elect the public meeting Planning Commis- sion process as opposed to th~ administrative approval Prior ~o any public meeting regarding the subdivision process, the d~veloper will give at least ~wo weeks writ- ten notice e£ ~hs public meeting to K~nnoth MsIntyre and Paul ~amerman, representatives of the citizens. At least two weeks prior to the initial pnblio meeting, the developer will arrange through the Planning Department a meeting with the citizens to review th~ t~ntativ~ sub4i- Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Cut,in. Nays: Mr. Apptegate, Abetentioe: Mr. Mayas. After the v~te, Mr. Denial inquired whether or not h~ could ehang~ his ve~. ~r. Micas indicated it wuul~ not be appropriate. 87s039 (Amended) In Bermuda Magisterial District, FI~R~OKT D~V~OP~ C~RO~ ~equested r~zonin~ ~rom A~ricultural (A)~ Residential (R-15), Residential (R-i~), R~i~ntial (~-9), Kesidantial (R-7), Co~uni~y Bu~ine~ (B-2), an~ Light Industrial (M-~) ~o R~idencial (K-i~) wi~ Conditional Uss Planned Development to peri% ~e and b~lk exceptions. A mixed use d~velopment, to includ~ residential, officm, co~erclal, r~r~a~ional, and industrial uses, is planned. This request llss on a tohal of 972.5 acres fron=ing in %we (2) plaoe~ for a total o~ approzi- merely %,600 fee~ on ~e north line of East ~nndred Read, also fronting approximately 12,400 fe~t on ~e west line of ~he north an~ south lines of Meado~ille and B~uda Eund~ed Roads. Tax Map 100 (1) Part of Parcel 1~ Tax Map 117 (1~ Pair of Parcel 2~; Tax MaD 117-11 (1} Part of Parcel 24~ Tax Nap 1~8 (1) Parcels 1, 22, and 33 and Part of ~arc~l ~ Tax Map 118-~ (I] Parcel 6; Tax Map 118-9 (2) We~tov~r Fa~ Lots 28 througk ~1~ 94, 35~ bt, 39, 40, 94, 95, 9~, 100, 10l, 104, 105, and 106; Tax Map 118-10 (1] Par~el~ 2, 3, and 32~ Tax Map 118-10 (2) Revision Lot 2~, ~ermuda O~hre Plat, LOts A aRd ~; Tax ~ap liS-10 (5} Fulcher LO~S Pla~, LOt 1~ Tax Map 118-11-(1} Parcel 4; Tax Map I18-14 (1) Paruel 40; and Tax MaD 118-15 (1) Part of Parcel 4 (sheet 33). It was generally agreed the Board would recess for five (5) minut~. Mr. Currin disclosed to the ~oard that he is co-owner o~ the snbject property, declared a conflict of interest purau~nt te ~he Virginia Comprehensive Conflict o~ Interest Act and e~cused himself from the meeting. 88-739 Mr. Jacobsen ¢tated the Planning Co~aission race--ended approval of Case 87S039, suhjest to aertain conditions. Mr. Oliver Rudy, representing the applicant, presented a brief overview of the proposed projest and stated the developer intends to construct a quality development which is compatible with area neighborhoods. Me s~ated ihs recommended conditions were acceptabl~, with the e×¢eption of Conditiop t8 as racom- as recommended by the Planning Commission. Ther~ was opposition prement. Sr. Jacobsen presented a summary concerning the Planning Commission's recommended condition I8 versus staff's recom- mended condition, explaining that the commission's version of =he ¢ondi=ion provided more flexibility for commercial ~evelep- meat near Snnset Boulevard. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Beard approved Case STSO39, subject to the following conditions: 1. The £ollnwin~ ~onditiona notwithstanding, the plan and Textual Statement submitted to the Planning D~partment on June 17, 1988, shall be considered the Master Plan; how- eve~, Section B, on page 8 of the Textual Statement shall not bo accepted. 2. Excep~ as noted herein, the entire property shall be developed in accordance wi~h the Corridor Overlay District standards. 3. Except as noted herein (see Conditions 4, 18, 19, and 20), tracts shall be developed as depicted om the approved Mas~er Plan for uses as outlined in the Textual statement for specific tracts. ~owever, at the time of sshemat- ic/~ubdivision plan apprOVal f~r any use within a specific tract, the 9Ianning Commission may approve o~her uses as outlined in the TeXtual Statement for other tracts, provided that the following re~uiremen%~ are met: a} The appliean~ skull notify in writing, at least fifteen (15) days in advance of any bearing for schematic approval, al~ persons ownin~ property ad~aeent and neighboring tc the property for which schematic approval is requested and, in addition, all persons owning property a~jac~nt or Deighborimg to th~ entire development, ~o application or petition shall be acted upon ~ntil the owners of adjoining property and owners of any property across any street, road or railroad right of way from such property and tract shall have been given not less than fifteen {l~) days' written notice sent by regis- tered~ certified or first class mail for any hearing ~n any noah appllo~ica c= petition. If suck written notice is provided by first class mail, the applicant shall make affidavit that such mailing~ ~ave be~n made and file such affidavit with the papers in the case in the Planning D~pertment. In the even= =he property is situated at or within 100 feet of the intsrsec=ion cf any two (2) or more roads or high- ways, at or within 100 leek of th~ int~r~ction of any road or highway with any railroad right of way or within 100 feet of the interseatioR of the right way of any two {2) railroads~ the notice required above must also be given to the owners cf property situated at all corners of any such intersection. h) At the ti~e of schematic/subdivision plan review of such uses, the Planning Coa~aissien may impose addi- tional condition~ %o insur~ proper land use transi- tion and compatibility based upon the possibility 88-7&0 that the adjacent uses may he developed for the least compatible land use permitted by the approved Textual Statement and conditions of zoning. ~owever, if an overall revised land use plan is submitted to the Planning Commission for approval, 'the Planning land use transition and compatibility based upon that plan. c! Thc overall density for the satire development shall exception that the overall gross ~quare footage of development and/ur the overall number of residential units may be increased by s maximum of twenty psrcentr subject to the approval of the Planning Department and Transportation Department. 4. Except as permitted herein, building permits for any in Land Says Six and Eight and any non-residential use~ in Land ~ay Seven, ~hall not be released until the proposed 1-295 interchange is committed for construction. Building permits may be released for research and development uses in Land Bays SiM and Eight north of Meado~m~ille Road prior to the 1-295 interchange being committed fox construction if: structlcn £rom the site to ~outs 10; and b. uses within ~and ~ays Six and ~ight are restricted that the 1-195 interchange ~s either constructed or (NOTE: This condition does not supersede any ~uiremen~$ which may be placed upon development by approval of the Traffic Analy~i~. Rather, the condition i~ in addition to any requirements which ~ay bs placed upon development by the Transportation Department.) shell depict the routin$, sizing, and tie-in points for by the Utilities Department. (U) 6. Public sewer shall be used. The fallowing improvements al The developer shall extend public sewsr from the Meadowvilte Trunk sewer line to serve the property. construction Qf this extension, from the existing to include an additional sewer line under the inter- The developer ~hall b~ responsible for ~oquiring any to ~he site. 7. Withi~ Land Bay Two, t~he actual edge of ~he ravine which is totaled adjacent to Land Bay One shall be field located and a natural, undisturbed %w~nty~five (25) foot area shall be established from th% top of the ravine edge. $~-741 Unless a plan is submitted to Environmental Enqineerinq for review and approval, this twenty-five {25) foot area shall rsmain, undisturbed with the exception that ration of two (2) inches ur loss may be selectively removed. 8. Prior to any land disturbing activity, an overall drainage development =×cludinq the tentative plan Of Eiversbend Subdivision, in accordance with the discussion section of the "Request Analysis and RecoI~nendatlon" and any subse- quent meetings with Environmental Engineering, shall b~ submitted to, and approved by, Environmental Engineering and VDOT. (EE) 9. Unless otherwise prohibited by the Corps of Engineers or unless otherwise allowed by th~ Director of no land area bordering the northern side of existing Meado~ville Road and the ~e~tern side of Route 1-295 shall drain towards Johnsenm Creek. 10. Prior to any individual tract plan approvals for any a~eas which have wetland potential, as datermine~ by the devel- oper's wetlands consultant, doc~ment&tiun from the U.S. Corps of Engineers, that the proposed individual development will be permitted, shall be submitted to Environmental ~ngineerinq. IEE) 11. Concrete serb and gutter shall b~ utilized, as regulated by the SUbdivision Ordinance, Won-fr0~tage roads may be exempt from this requirement upon approval by th~ Environmental ~nglneering Department, the Trangpcrta- tlon Department and VDOT. 12. Prior to the release of any buildinq permits or recorda- tion of any ~ubdivi~ions adjacent to any new pttblie road~ or which have access to an~ new public roads, construction plan~ for the length of the road necessary to pre-ida aocess to an existing State maintained road or a recorded road sh~ll be submitted to, and approved by, =nvironmental Engineering and ~DOT. Ail necessary right of way shall ~e dedicated unless o~herwi$¢ permitted by znvironmental Engineering. These plans shall be submitted separately ~rom subdivision or schematic plans. Construction of the read~ may be phaeed upon approval by Environmental Engineering and the Transportation Department. 13. Prior =o state acceptance, ownership and maintenenoe cf any lakes and/or detention basins shall be esfablished as the reeponsibili=y of private entities. An indemnifica- tion agreement shall be submit%ed tO ~nvironmental =ngi- nearing to save the County harmless cf vectors, mainte- nance, and replacement r~sponsibilit~s. Upon of ~h~se facilities and prior to State acceptance, the structural and hydraulic integrity of th~e f~¢illties shall be certified by a professional engineer. 14. To avoid ~otential algae and siltation p~0blems, the minimum depth of any lakes located in, or adjacent residential areas shall not be ieuu than thr~e {3) feat within ~en (10) feet of tko shorelin=. Prior to er in conjunction with recordation cf any subdivision or final approval of any site plan ~er property draining to any lakes, which will net b~ operated by the owners of the golf course, a maintenance and operations manual ehall be p~evlded to the future owners. 15, NO building shall be located within the inundation of a dam failure Occurring during a 100 year storm event. Calculations shall be submitted fo ~nvironmental Engineer- ing for documentation. The inundation limits ~hall be 88-742 shown On ~ubdivi~ion plats and site plans for all affected property. (EE) 16. An overall, prcj~t-wlde cro~icn and sediment control plan which includes provisions for the construction of the golf course and a plan for maintaining the stability of the ~teep ~lopes in beth residential and non-residential areas, shall be submitted to, and approved by, Environ- mental Engineering and implemented, as applicable, prior to any vegetative disturbance. (EE) 17. schematio/subdivision plans shall be submitted for entire tracts, as outlined on the Ma~ter Plan. At the time of schematlc/s~bd~v~slo~ piano' review of each tract, the Planning Comlais~ion may~imp~e additional conditions to insure proper land use transition and compatibility ba~ed upun the possibility %hat the adjacent tract{s) may be developed for the least compatible land ~$e permitted by the approved Textual Statement. ~ow~v~r, if ~n Overall land nsc plan is submitted to the Planning Co~miiasion for approval, th~ 91arming Commission may impose oonditien$ to address proper lend use transition end compatibility based upon that plan. Thi~ land use pied aha11 specify ~he allcwlog the ~ppi~g Commission to address specific con- consideration. This overall land use plan may be modified by the Planning Commission throuqhout the life of the development subject to a revised overall plan being sub- portions of Tracts a & b in Land Bay Four, lying generally Tract g in Lan~ Bay Five, lying generally adjacent to which lies adjacent %0 Fulcher lots and Woodvale Subdi- arranged,, or designed to be used except for one or mere of the following uses: pro£s~sional, 2. Libraries. 3. Brokerages. 4. Churoh~s and/or S~nday Schools. 5. Convalescen~ homes, nursing homes, r~st 6. Day care centers, {child or adult) 7. Grsup care facilitims. Museums. 9. Propaqation and cultivation of ~r0ps, flowers, trees, and shrubs which are not offered for sale. · Pubt~o .and p~ivate .'forests, wildllfa preserves . and c~nservatlon area~ 11. Travel ag~ncie~ to include tr~vel arranging and transportation ticket ~el-vices. 8~-743 12. 16. 17, I8. UtiLity ~s=u located underground when such are located in easements, or in public roads ' r~q~t~ o~ way..:: ~ ~.~. . medical clinics provided that neither the busi- ness act ~ha building is designed to accommodate ambulance traffic. Optometrist sales and service provided thai the ~ales and servicing of eyewsar is done by an optometrist as an accessory use in conjunction with a medical practice; and no= more ~han fifteen (15) p~rcent of the gross floor area is Pharmacies ~rovided that the use is located in a building containing other medical services; and does not ha~e a ~eparate entrance to the out- side. Temporary oonstr~ctlan trailers/buildings pro- vided that the temporary ~tructure is d~voted exolusively ~o construction activities on premises; and is removsd upon completion or abandonment of uua~truc=iun activities. Veterinary offices provided that ne boarding is petit%ed; no o~tside runs are permitted; and no o~ern~gh~,.ca~e is~perm~tted.: : ~ublic and private utility uses, so lonq as they require a structure, to include all water and waste water pumping s~a~ions; eleotr£e, gas, coramuni~ations, and natural gas, li~uified petrols=m gas (LPG) and petrele~t~ Droducis transmissions facilltiem; in addition, natural gas, liquified petroleum gas, and petroleum productn transmission faciliti~ above Or below ground, provided that all such nmnm which are visible from adjacent residential or office Agricultural (A) and shown on the General Plan as residential or office uses are ~nclosed within a e~ruet~re having a style an4 character office s~rue~ures or are completely screened for the northern portion of Tracts A and B in and;or theater may be permitted by the Planning to a 1O0 foot buffer being maintained along the ~orthern ~oun4ary cf the tracts and e sits design which prOtect~ the r~sidentiaI integrity of the adjacent residential neighborhood. Further, if at ~he time of schematic plan review, ~he adjacent property to =he north has and the buffer and site design criteria shall be (i.e., Condltlen S8-744 B. The following resulted conditions shall be met end shall be in addition to other conditions outlined in the Textual S~atemen= and conditions herein: 1. NO goods shall be produced for retail sale on the premi~. 2. Ail uses shall be uonducted entirely within an encloses building, except for accessory a~tome- bile parking. 3. Individual buildings shall not exceed 10,000 ~q~are feet if located within existing residential zoning district or area currently zoned agricultural and shown on the General ~lan for residential use. Individual project~ ehetl not exceed 7,500 ~quare feet of gross floor area per acrs. All structarss shall have an architectural style compatible with surrounding residential neighborhoods. Com- patibility may b~ achieved through ths use of similar building massing, materials, scale or oth~r architectural features. 4. Loading docks and drivs~in loading doors shall b~ prohibited. 5. with the exception of church~s, convalescent homes, rest homes and nursing opsratien for any use 8hall he r~stricted to h@tw~en 6:50 a.m. and ~OO p.m. The fellewing requirements shall apply to Land ~ay Four, Tracts o. and d., retail districts: A. ~o ~uildings, structures, Or premises shall be used or arranged ,or designed to 5~ ug~d ex¢=p~ for the following oses: 10. 11.. 12. 13. 14.. 15. 1. Bakery goods store. 2. Banks and savlnqs end l~en a~goeiaticns with or without ~rive-in windows. Bar,er er beauty shop. 4. Book er eea~i~n~ry store. Camera store. ?. candy stere. S. Drug s%ers/gharmacy. 9. Dry cleaning, pick up and drop off; coin ed dry cleaning; pre~ing~ laundry an~ laundro- mat; not to include dry cleaning 91antsl Dry goods store. Dairy products Florist shop. 16. Nursery schools, child or adult day care s~nters and kindergartens. 17. ©ffices~ b~$iness, goverrm%ental~ medical and professional. Restaurants, not i~¢luding fast food or car~y Shoe repair shop. 20. Tailoring and dressmaking shops. 21. Telephone booth~ 22. Variety store. 23. Video rental and sales 24. Medical clinic~ provided that neither the busi- ness nor the building is designed to accommodate ambnlano~ traffic. 25. Optometrist sales and mervic~ provided that the ~at~ an~'"servi~ing of' '~yewear' is done by an Optometrist as an accessory use in conjunction with a medical p~actice; and not more than fifteen (1~) percent of ~he gross floor ar~a is devoted to such sales and services. 26. Temporary construction trailers/buildings pro- vid~d that the temporary structure shall be ~evotcd ezclnsively to COnstruction activities on the pr~m£ses; and is removed upon completion or aba~dor~ent of construction activities. 27. Veterinary offices provided that no boarding is pel~mitted; no eutsi~e runs are permitted; and no overnight care is permitted. 28. Public and private utility uses~ so long as they require a structure, to include all water and waste water pu~p~ng stations; electric, gas, COmmunications, and natural ga~ Iiquified petrole~un gas (LP~ and petroleum =ransmissions facilities; in addition, natural gas, liquilied petroleum gas, and petroleum products transmission facilities above or below groun4, provided that all ~uch u$~s which are zoned properties or 9rop~rtle~ currently within a Structure having a style and character ~ompa~ible wi~h surrounding residential office structures or are completely from view from SUch a~jacent properties. 29. Fire stations, rosco% s~uads Drovided that ~xterna] sirens or 9.A. systems are provided; and all garage-tyD~ doors are screened ~rom view of adjacent residential prop~r%ie~ or area~ currently zoned agricultural and ~hown on the General Plan for residential 30. Motor v~hicle accessory store provided that motor vehicle repair is permitted; and no shall be installed on the premises. 31, Gasolin~ uales in conjunction with a permitted u~e and provided that such use is not located along streets which terminate in a residential neighborhood. 88-746 B. Thm required conditions shall be met and shall be in addition to other conditions outlined in the Textual Statement and. con~itlons h~r~in~ 1. Individual store~ and ~hops shall not exceed 5,000 squars feet of gross floor area if located within 200 feet of am existing residential zoning district or area currently zoned agricul- tural and shown on the General Plan for rial ums~ hut in no case larger than 12,000 square iset of gross floor area. Individual projects shall not excasd 7,500 square feet of gross floor arsa per acre. Ail structures, including qasoline canopies, shall have an archlteetural style compatible with surrounding residential neighborhoods. 2. No ~oods may be produced for retail sale on the premises if more than five (5) persons are engaged in such production. 3. Ail uses, including storage, shall be conducted entirely within an enclomed building, e~cept for accessory automobile parking, loading o~ UnlOad- inq facilities. 4. ~ours Of operation shall be r~mtricted to be- 5. A ~i~ty (50}' toot buffer shall ba alonq the mouth boundary of Tract d. in Land Bay Four. This buffer may be redussd and/or deleted by the Planning Department .at such time that adjacent property is dev=lepe~ and/or zoned for similar uses. Existing vegetation within the buffer shall be ~etained where possible and shall be supplemented with landscaping, so as to provide year-round screening of the view buildings and pa~kin9 areas from adjacent prop~ ~rty. At a minimum, landscaping shall be in accordanc~ with Corridor Overlay District stan- dards, Landscaping C. Other than landscaping, fencing~ irrigatio.~ and utilities that run generally perpendicular thrn~gh this buffer, there shall be no f,cilities located in the buffer. At ~his time of schematic plan review, for any Ici or parcel.which abut~ ~he buffer, a conceptual landscaping plan shall ba ~ubmitted to the Planning Department for review and ~roval. Within thirty (30) day~ of rough clear- · ng and grading, a detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Planninq Department for review and epproval. The d~tailed plan shall include tho general location of existing vegetation ~o be retained, %he loom%ion of proposed vegetation and fenee~ and sectiono through th~ b%ffer,. In addition, uses in Tract c., Land ~ay Four~ shall he designed, oriented integrity and lifestyles of adjacent residential The following requirements shall apply to ~hs southern 9ortien~ of Land Ba~ FOur, Tracts a and b, retail dis- trict, and Land Bay Five, Tract g, Astail district. A. ~o buildings, structure~, or premises ~hall be used Or arranged or dssigned to be used except for th~ following g8-747 1. ~he same uses as permitted in 5and Bay ~our, Tra~ts c and d, r~fail district. 2. Antigua shape, nO% to include pawn shops and second-hand stores. 3. Appliance stores. 4. Art schools, galleries ur museums. 5. A~tist material and supply stores. 6. Automobile self-service orations, 7. Bicycle ~ale$ and rentals. 8. Ceterinq establishments. · 9. ..Clothes.~toree. ., 16. Communication s%udio~ offic~s and sta~ion~ exclusive o~ towers. Curio or ~ift shops. Department stores. 13. belicatussens. 14. Frozen food locker and sales, 16. Furniture stores. 18. H~alth clubs. 19. 5obb~ efores. 20. Nospit~ls, r~$t~ nur$in~ and convalescent homes. 21. ~w~try s~ore. 22. Libraries ...... Locksm£th operation~ Meat market. 25. Medlca~ facilities os clinlss. Messenger or telegraph services. Musical instrument store. astrologers, fortune tellers, tea Leaf readers, ~rephe~s, etc. optometrists sales and eervices. 35. Pet shops, including pet grooming. Philanthropic and charitable uses. 35. Photography ~tudios. Posh officms. 371 Radio, television and other home entertainment, sal~s and services. Rental of health and party equipment~ and small 39. Restaurants to include carry out restaurants and fast food restaurants. 40. SchooI~--musi~, dance and business. 41. Sewing machine sales~ instruction, and services. 43. ~elephOne exchange=. 44. Toy stores. 45° Travel arranging and transportation ticket 46. Veterinary clinics. 47. Printing shops provided that only copying and/or presse~ or web pre,see ~hsll be permitted. 48. Towers, provided that the structure is architec- turally incorporated into and compatible with the design of a buildin~ used for permitted use. Purther~ the following minimum re~uir~d ~endition~ ~hall be m~t and ~hall be in u~ition to other conditions herein: 1. No goods may be produced for retail sal~ on thm premises, if more than ten (10) persons are 2. Outside display of merohan~iss for ~ale shall be permft%ed provided it i~ located within covered sidewalks or courtyard areas and such areas are desigaed for such use and pedestrianways are maintained. One {1) foot excsptlon to the ten (1~) foot parking space width r~quirement shall be granted for parking spaces ~hiah are lo~ated within parkin~ deers, provided that require~ handicapped parking spaces shall be a minimum of 12.5 feet in width. Landscaping shall he accomplished around the perimeters of parking d~ek~ similar to 1and- soaping around the perimeters of office buildings. Con- o~ptnal plans depicting thi~ r~quif~m~n~ shall be submit- ted to the Planning Commission for approval in conjunctf~n with ~¢h~matie plan ~eview. Dstailed pl~n~ shall be sabmiSted to the Planning Department for approval within thirty ($0) deys of clearing an~ rough grading. (P) All Residential-Townhcuse development shall conform to the bulk requirements of the ResidentiaI-To~rnhous~ (R-TN} District, except as follows: A. The minim%u~ parcel size shall be eight {8) gross 22. 88-749 23. 24. B. The density shall not exceed tmn (10) anit~ to the ¢. Required recreational ~acilitias ~hall be provided as a part of the Freeport Development ms a whole with pedestrian access available. A fifty (50) foot setback shall bs maintained alon~ Route 295. ~xistlng high story tr~s located within this set- back area shall be maintained. (P) Buffers a~,,Sc~aenin~ Buffers shall be designed to provide a horizontal distance and open space, b~t~een :C~rtai~ uses; preserve vegetation; provide transition and separation; reduce noise and and/or maintain privacy. Buffers shall provide inter- mittent visual separation between uses. Screening ~hell provide a vertical barrier and shall be designed ~o block visual or noise impact. Wkere unrelated to one another, buffers to ~nsure compatibility activities are located adjacent and screening shall be used between adjacent us~s. General Provision~ A. ~xisting mature vegetation located within required buffer~ shall bo ~aintained unless removal is approved by the Director of Planning. Further, preserved vegetation may be substituted for required ~and~¢aping material~ upon approval by the ~irec~or of Planning. B~ffers shall be p~ovi~ed On th~ lot or parcel An conformance with the uss identified the buffer matri×. C. Where th~ development i~ to coneain mOr~ than oas or group of uses, the more stringent requirements of the ~atrix shall apply. In thos~ circumstances where the arrangement of uses precludes ~he need for the mere stringent re~uir@m~nt~ th~ Director of Planning may allow the lesser requirements cf the matrix. D. Within bu~er areas, the only uses permitted by right shall be landscaping and screeninq as permitted herein; however~ the ~irector of Planning may permit signs; security fencing; utilities which rnn gen~raI- ly perpendioular through the buffe~ pedes=rian walkways~ or ~milar U$~$ withiu tbs buffer pr0vid~d the spirit and in%eat of the requirement is main- rained. The requirements for buffers and screening may modified by the Director of Planning under any cf the following con~itlons: 1. where =he strict provisions of this ~ec=ion WOuld reduce the usable area of a lot due to ~enfiqurati0n Or size to a point which would pr~clude a r~asonabl~ ~$e of the lot, buffer and/or screening requirements may be waived ur modified by the ~irect~r where the side er rear of a building, a barrier and/or the land between that building and the property line has been specifically designed to minimize adverse impast through a combination of ,archiCectura~ and landscaping ~eshniques. 2. Bu~ers and/or screening requirements may be mo~ifi~ wh~re The building, a barrier and/or i i i land be%ween %hat building an~ the property line has been specifically designed to minimize a~veree impact through a combination of archi- tectural and landscaping techniques. Buffer and/or ~r~ning r~qutremcnt~ may be waived or modified where the adjoining land is deslg~ated in tko adopted comprehensive plan for a use which weEld not require the provision of 4. Buffer and/or screening requirement~ may be waived or ~odified where the a~joinlng property i~ used for any public purpose other than a school, day care center or hospital. 5. Buffer and/or SCreening requirements may be waived or modified where adjacent residential property is used for any use permitted by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the ~oar~ of sors as a Special Exception or a Conditional Use schools. 6. Buffer and/or zcre~ning requirements may be waived or ~odifled when the adjoining land is an R district and is u~d for non-r~nidential purposes. 7. Buffer and/or screening requirement~ may be waived or mo~i~ied where the topography is suck that th~ requirements of this section would not be effective. Buffer and/or screening r~quirem=nts may be waived or modified between uses that are fo be develope~ uade~ a common development plan. Buffer and $c/esuinq Requirements A. Buffmrs shall bs provided as shown on the buffer width matrix. Landscaping shall be accomplished within required buffers as follows: 1. A twenty-five (25) foot buffer shall consist of an unbroken strip of open space ~nd shall be plante~ in acc6rdance w~h Cerrldo~'~Oeerlay ' ' Dfstrict iand~capin~'' 'r~quire~nt~, Perimeter Landscaping C. 2. A fifty (50) foot buffer ~hall consist Of ac ed at 1.5 times the density of Corridor Overlay District landscaping requirements, Perimeter Landmcapimg C, 3. A seventy-five (75} foot buffer shall consist of an nnhroken strip of opmn space and planted at 2.0 times the density of Corridor Overlay District landscaping r~quirements, Perimeter Landmmapinq C. A 100 foot buffer shall consist of an unbroken strip of open space and shall be planted at 2.5 times the density oi Corridor Overlay District landscaping requirements, Perimeter Landscaping C. B. Scrssning. Sc~eenin~ shall be accomplished by building design or by the use of durable archi- tectural walls or fences conmtruct~d of ~at~riat~ equal in quality to the principal buildinq end using 88-751 a design compatible to that of th~ principal building located on the property. ~uffer Width ~atrix Except as otherwise specified herein, the required width of buffers shall be determined from the follow- ing ma=r~x. Tho loft column of the matrix represents the use of th~ zoning=lot ou~hich the buffer must be provided; t~e top ocean ~f the matrix represents the use of property Contiguous to the zoning lot. The interior numbers in tho matrix represent the width in feet of tho required buffer: BUFFER WIDTH MATRIX A1 Singl~ Family A1 + + Single · x Family + 50 Uses2 + 50 Ligh~ Commercial + 50 All o~her ...e ..... 75 Commercial/Offic~ ........... and Indus=rial Townhouses/Multi- Family + 25 25 5O *Notes: 1Buffer~ adjacent to raceD% agricultural zoning shall be ~etermined based upon the designation of the ugricultural property on the General ~lan. ~O~ice uees in northern per,ion of Tracts a and h in Land ~ay Four, end the northern portion of Tract g in Land Bay Five, Trace f in Land ~ay Four and that portion of Tract h in Land Bay Five which lies adjacent to ~ulch~ lots a~ ~eodv~le Subdivi~en. 3Light Commercial U~ea ~hall be those permitted in Trac~s c and ~nd further, the Board accepted the following proffered eondi- Applicant proffers to dedicate within one (1) yea~ of tho date of approval of r~zoning thirty ($0) acres for public use ~rae and unreotrieted~ The thirty (30) acre parcel i~ an shown on a plat made by charles c. Towhee & Associates, R.C., dated March 26, 19B~. Applicant proffers that said thirty.(30) acre parcel baa aoGess tQ Snon Church Road and that 22.5 acres of ~aid parcel ia outside tke bounds of the VIEPCO easement shown on said plat. This parcel is not located within the bounds of the project under consid- eration, bu~ is owned by the applicants and located near the intersection of Etate Route 617 and State Route 746. In the event thc 30-acre parcol dedicated to tho County is not planned for public purposes within six (6) y~ars of ~aid dedication, then the applicant ~hall have the ebro- 10. 12. 13. 14. lute righ= to purchase said property /rom =he County at the same per acre price which applicant paid to acquire said property originally in 1987. Upon request by the County, a minimum of 2.5 acres shall be dedica=ed by the Applicant to the CeoDty cf Chester- field free and unrestricted for use ae e fire stat/on, The exact location of said fire station shall be approved by the Fire Department and the Planning Depar~ent 9riot to any non-residential schematic plan approval, provided, however, location of said fire station shall not be made on any part of the project under consideration which has frontage on Route 10 and is South of Sunset Boulevard and/or old:Bermuda Hundred Road. The minimum Square footage for a detache~ single-family r~idant±al dwelling shall be 2,000 square f~et. All multi-family tracts shall be d~veloped as Town Houses and Condominiums. The Multi-Family will have the same deed restrictions, to th~ extent they can be applied, as existing River's Bend, with the exceDtlon of square ~oeeage r~qulre~ents. The Multi-Family will ~ot be constructed nnt~l contracting £Or a ~ropo~d golf course in completed. There will be no acc~ to e~isting ~cadowvill~ Road from Land Bay Four, unless modified by the Planning Commission a% =he ~ima of sahema=ie plan review, and the buffer will landscaping C and screening as determined through schemat- ic plan review. Developer will provide weekly trash maintenance. At sits plan review, Tract C may be used as office/business as determined by the Planning Commission. Relocat=d Meadowville Road will be construed and existing Meadowville Road cul-4e-sac with appzoval and time frames as determined by the Transpo~tatlon Department. Upon request by th~.~.r~ns~ortaticn. De~artment, developers will cul-de-sac Bermuda Bundred Road if approved Dy the Prior to site plan review fen Multi-Pamily a 5-member advisory committee of Znon reei~ential will be establish- A phase 1 archaeological study of existing Rochedale Farm, Tax Map %118, Parcel 1, will be done prior to schematic plan approval of Land Bays within Rochedale Farm. In =he event Meadowville Road is cul-de-sac'd, Applicants will grant access ~crcss'its proper~y in Lan~ Bey 6 to new Tax Parcel %118 (1) Parcel 3 at a location acceptable to parcel. The ~a~tar Plan submitted with the application shall be considered the Master Road Plan. Approval of the plan by the County does not imply that the County gives ~inal approval of any particular road alignment or section. In addition to submission of road construction plans to VDOT and environmental =ngineering, the plans ehall also meat. 15. 16. Specific roadway improvement~, ~et forth in %he$~ t~an~- por~ation proffers, are required by the ti~e of full mits development and ar~ hobs c©nst~ucte~ in accordance-with the phasing plan approved by th~ Tranmportation Depart- ment. If requested, the Developer shall provide the ~ransporta%ion Department with additional traffic studies ~pon c~mpletion of each phase of construction. Roadway improvements ~hatl ~e increased or decreased by the Developer as required by the ?ranspo~ation Department if the additional studies indicate that traffic g~neration rates and di~tributionm ~olely from this development differ materially a~ determined by the Transportation Department from the original projeotions in the Keller¢o Traffic Impact Study dated September 8, 1998, S~ptember 21, 1988, and September 23, 1988. %f satisfactory im- provements cannot be provided, the Planning Commission may reduce the p~rmissible densities to the a~ten~ that the Transportation Department. TO provide for an adequate roadway system at the time of the complete development of th~ proposed project, the Developer will be responsible for th~ following: determined by the Transportation D~par~n%, con- strno%ion of a r~p in the northwest and southwest · quadrants and a' loop in southeast q~adrant o~ the proposed Meado~ille/I=295 inter~hanqe. 2. Construction of Meado~itl~ Road as a min~ 4 lane divided fac~lity with aduqua~e turn lanes and signa- lization from Route 10 ho Meado~ille Road Relocated. minim~ 4 lane divided facility with ade~a~e turn lanes and ~i~nalization from Rout~ 10 %o 1-295. 4. Con~t~ction oi Kingston Avenue Extended as a minimum 4 lane divided facility wi~ adequate turn lanes and signalixation from Route 10 to M~ado~ill~ Road Relocated. 5. Construction of ] additional westbound late and 1 ~d4itlonal seethe=nd lane on Route 10 from 1-295 through the Meado~ille Road intersection. Con- affection of a second wustbound lane on Routu 10 from the 1-295 interchange ~rough Kingston Avenue/Route lane on R~te 10 from %he Meado~ille Rulocated/Route 10 in=ersec~ion through the M~ado~ille/Route 10 int~r~ection. Th~ exact dimensions of these lanes is to be approved by ~he Transpor=a=ion Depar~en= a= road plan approval. Full cost of traffi= signalization on all internal roads and Meado~il%6 Relocated/RO~ 10 inter- section; one half the co~% of traff'ic signalization at MeadO~ille Road/Route 10 and Kingston Avenue/Route 10 in%~r~ctionn. 7. Prior to th~ i~uance of'any building per~i%$ Or in a~cordance with th~ approved phasing plan, the following right-of-way to the County; a) sufficient ~ight-of-way for th= COnStruction of the meado~ille/I-295 interchange improvements a minimum of 120' of right-of-way ~or Meadow- villa Road c) a minimum of 90' of right-of-way for Kingston d) 100' of right-of-way measured from the canter- line of Route 10 for the entire property front- age along aouta 10 e) any additional right-el-way required for thc construction of the proffered roadway improve- ments listed above 17. In conjunction with the first schematic plan submission, a phasing plan for r~quir~d road imp~ovemeDt~, with ing trellis analysis, if requested by the Transportation Department for approval. A buffer shall be provided along Route 10~ Meadc~ille Road/Meadowville Road Relocated, and Kingston Road ~xten- sion, Aeces~ through these buffers sh~ll be approved by the Transportation DeDartment. 19. Prior to issuanc~ of any building perm£ta, a noise stndy must be eu~itted to and approved by the Transporta- tion DeDartment. The study shall identify the need noise attenuation in the development adjacent to 1-295 in accordance with Federal Highway Administration noise predi~tlon ~rlt~ria with modiilcatlons approwe4 by Transp~rtatlon Department. The d~veloper ~hall be spon$1ble for impl~en%ing ~ny required mitigation the Transportation Depar~nt. 20. S%~b road rights-of-way shall be provided to (Tax Map 99{1) 14, 15, and 16 and Tax MaD 118(1) 3). This condi- tion may be modified by the Planning Co~immion at time of sch~atic plan approval. development~ 829,250 ~quaTe f~e% of offic~ 542,500 s~uare feet of office/wurehoume, 690,000 square feet of retail, denmi~ies as approved by the Transpo~eaeion D~par~n% unleSS additional ~oad improvements are provided by the developer to insure tha~ a minim~ D level of service determined by the Transportation D~par~ent will maintaine~. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Nr. Sullivan, ~r. Daniel and Mr. Mayas. Absent: Mr. Coffin. 88SN00~5 In Midtothian Magisterial District, ~DF ~SSOCIATES ~%ND ~rlSLIAM R. CA~]'I~IOi~ requeeted amendmen~ to Conditional U~9 ~laDD~ Develo~en~ (Case ~6S092) to allow Convenience Business (B-l) request lia~ in a Convenience Bu~ines$ {B-l} Bi~trict on a 9.7 acr~ parcel fronting approximately ~30 feet on the South lin~ of Robio~s Road~ approximately 250 feet southeast of Wiesinger Lane. Tax Nap 8-16 (1} Parcel 2 (Sheet 1). Mr, Currin discloeed to the Board the= he is Dart owner of the property under coneideration, declared a conflict of inter~t 88-?55 pursuant to the Virginia Comprehanzive Conflict Of Interest Act and excused himself from th~ meeting. Mr. 3aeo~son stated the Planning Commission has recommended denial of Ca~e 88SN0065, but that staff has recommended weuld restrict th~ type of development permitted on the site. Mr. Peele presented a eu~m~ary oi the request. Mr. William R. Cawthorn, representing the applieant~, ~tated was requesting removal of a restrictive condition whisk requir- ed, under current zoning, that the pr©party be used oDly for nursing home: stated he had also requested an exception for one B-1 zoning district but was requesting that it be withdrawn: explained the history of the subject property and presented the Board with a memorandum on the status of the law p~rtaining to the taking of property without just compensation; and requested a thirty (30) day deferral. ~r. Bob Riley, President of Brial-wood Civic Association, stated there wa~ strung opposition of area residents relative to the proposed grocery stere; expressed concerns for safety and ~ite; 'stated' there were 'enough strip shopping centers in the general area; stated the developer was aware 0~ the conditions of zoniDg when he opted to purchase the property; indicated residents £sel th~ parcel of land was zoned properly now would be willing to accept an office type development more consistent with the Northern Area Plan; and requested the Board deny the request. Mr. John Bate~, r~pre~enting monfoor~ of the ~ria~wood and Fitness Center, submitted a petition in opposition to the development, safety/traffic coacern~ the rea~ ~f the shopping o~nt~r facing the entrance with loading/unloading zones for shopping center and the grocery store. Mr. Applegate expressed concerns relative to legal issues, down-zoning, the ramification of restricted user, ets. Mr. Micas ~tated this request is not considered to be a down-zoning and, in fact, staff's recommendatien would increase the number of ~ses permitted on the Mr. Sullivan mad~ a me,ion, ~econde~ by ~r. Mayas, to ~eDy tbs amendment to permit alt ~-1 u~es sad the bulk exception to the 12,000 square foot limitation and to approve re=cnin~ to office ~usiness lO) with Conditional Use Planned Developmont to permit a limited number of Convenience Business (g-l) utes in con- junction wi~h office ~evelopment or a nursing home plus certain setback exceptions for Case Mr. Daniel suggested a ~hirty (~0) day deferral so the ramifi- cations cf the request could be studied. There was further discussion relative to a thirty {3D) day deferral. Mr. Sullivan noted that the Planning Commission, staff, the neigh- borhood and he are in accord on this case, and their collective position is So faf from what the developer is requesting that he felt a =hirty (30) ~ay ~efsrral would not be productive. M~. Daniel stated he ~as net comfortable with making a hasty decision with respect to this ease and could not ssa irrevo~ cable harm by d~ferring cafe thirty (30) After further discussion, Mr. ~ulllvan ~mended his motion, suconded by Mr. Daniel, to defer consideration of Case uutil October ~6, 1988, Ayes: Mr. Applegate, ~r. Sullivan, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mayas. Abeen~ 'Mr, Curtis. Mr. Currin returned to the masting. ~$SN0085 ~n Clover Kill Magisterial District, KAREN i~ALTY, INC. requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Light Industrial (K-l). An office and office/warehouse complex is planned. This ~equest lies on a 1.8 acre parcel fronting apD~o×ima%ely 100 f~t on the east line of Branohway Road, apDroximately 600 feat north of Southlake Boulevard. Ta~ Map 17-13 {1) Parcels 2 and 9 {sheet apDroval of CaBs 88SN0085 and acceptance of %he proffered conditions. Ee skated the applicant was Dot pr¢~en~; however, she had indicated the re~o~enda~ion wa~ acceptable. Mr. spoken with the applicank who had accepted the r¢co~endaSion On motion Qf M~. App~ega~e, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, ~he ~oard apD~oved Case 88SN0085 and accepted fihe following condition~: b. Office-Warehouse a. All u~ility lin~s ~hall be provid¢4 Wi~ underground distribution. b. All driveways and parkinq areas shall be paved. A%~ uses %ooa~ed within 260 feet of Branchway Road sh~ll be limited to offlces. the centerline of Branchway Road, shall be to and for the Connty of Che~h~rfield~ free and ~nrestricted, prior ~o hh~ i$~uaDoe of any building p~rmit. Additional pavement and ou~b an~ gutter shall be installed along Br~nchway Road. Vote: Unanimou~ $8~N0090 In Matoaca Magisterial District, MALA ASSOCIATES requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Convenience Business An office/nursing ho~ complex is planned. This requash liss On a 6.2 acre parce~ fronting approximately 414 feet on the north line Of I~on Brid~e Road, approximately 530 feet west Chalktey Road. Tax Map 114-6 (1) Parcel 5 and Ta~ Map 114-7 {1) Paxsel ~9 {sheet ~r. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recommended a~proval of Case 88SN0090 and a~ceptance of the proffered Nr. John Ryan, r~presentin~ the applicant, stated the ~u~jeek application is for the development of a h~e fgr ~h~ aged, not a nursing ho~e. He noted, for the record, that the collector road, shown betwean the Iro~bridge Development and Chalkley Roa~, is oonoeptual at ~his time. There was no opposition present. ~8-757 On motion of ~r. ~a¥~, ~¢onde~ by ~r. ~nrrin~ th~ ~O~n~ approved Case 88~N0096 and accepted the followinq proffered condition: Uses permitted shall be limitsd to those permitted in the 'offioe Business' (O) Die~rict~ plus a home for the aged, nnr~ing home con~lesoent home, rest home and customary in Matoaea ~agisterial District, JAM~S E. COLE requested rezoninq from Agricultural (A) to Residential {R-15}. A single family residential subdivision is planned. This request lies on a 132.0 acre parcel tying at the northern t~rminu~ of Rockyrun Road, and northeast of the intersection of Glebe Point and Bradley Bridg~ Roads, Tax Map 131-15 (1) Parcel 1 (Sheet Mr. Currin disclosed to the Board that hie ~ompany has pre,ant- conflict of interest pursuant to the Vfrgini~ COmprehensive Confflct of Interest Act and excused himself fram the meeting. Mr. Jacobsen ~tated the Planning Commission r~eo~end~d denial of Case 85SN0055 as ~he proposal does not conform to ~he Southern Area Land Use and Trans~ortstlon Plan designation for rural density residential development, a ma~ter plan for balanced development to include the subject site and adjacent land holdings of the seller is not available, and uncoordinated rezoning without a master plan for ~evelopment negates the County's ability to adequately plan for public infrastructure necessary to support residential development (e.~., schools, roads, parks, etc.). Ke stated staff recommended the applicant request a ~ferral of a sufficient ~ngth o~ tim~ to allow the applicant to deVelOp with staff a master plan for development aCcOrdance with such a plan. Mr. J~es Cole stated h~ had requested a thirty (30) defierral because he had recently become aware of info,etlon relative tO the adja=eut propextiu~ which he felt wout~ have a present property owner wished to meet wi~ Glebe Point Sub- division residents to discuss theee Mr. Michael Th~D~on, ~epresen~ing Gleb~ Point S~division residents, voice~ opposition ~o the request as i= proposes use Glebe Point as th= sole access to the development~ exprcus- density, house size and quality, stub road~ to ad3acen% propert- ies, restricted cons=rue%ion vehicle access, etc.; and request- d~nsi%y residential d~velo~nt (0,5 unit~/acr~ or less) as o~tlined in the 8onthern Area Land Use and Transportation Plan for this area of the Count'y an~ requested th~ Board deny th~ proposed request because it is inconuistent with %he Plan. Mr. Cole indicated ~ere are ad,scent s~bdivisions zoned property to prohibit th~ ~ole u~ of Gleb~ Point Road 5s the only access to ~his development; a~clogized for ~he late notice under the impression he could reqnsst and bs granted a deferral if th=re were extenuating circumstances r~garding the and inquired if the Board woul~ confider approval of a change in his request from R-15 to R-88 at ~is Mr. gpplegate staked he felt there had been ample time for the applicant/developer to have met with ar~a res±debts prior to this request being pre~ented to the Board, expressed concerns relative to the the request for 1-acre lots, the exceeding of the fifty (50) lot requirement relative to ingress/egress, m~ting with area residents regarding house compatibility/size, etc.~ and ~tated hs felt a sixty (60) day deferral would bs more beneficial toward reeolvinq these issues. Mr. Mayas stated those area reaiden%s involved in the dovelop- ment of the southern Area Land Uf~ and Transportation Plan wish tO see development conform %o ~he Blah and stated ~e could not support the applicant's request in its prefent form. ~e i~ the opposition did not object he would consider the de- ferral. Mr. Thompson stated Glebe Point resident~ would the case. Mr. Jernigan expressed concerns that the Southern Area Plan not be destroyed in the process of negotiation for the proposed request and indicated a deslr~ to b~ incluOe~ in on motion of Mr. Mayer, seconded by Mr. deferred consideration of Ca~ ~99~. Sullivan, the Board un~il November 2~, Ayes: Mr. App~egats, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mayas. Absent~ Mr. Currin, After a brief d~scu~sion, it was generally agreed that a joint meeting of ~he Board of Supervisors and the School Board be scheduled for October 20, 1988, at 10:00 On motion of Mr. ~l~i~n, ~oonded by Mr. Daniel, t~e ~oar~ adjourned at 5~30 p.m. until 7:00 ~.m. sn October 12~ Lane B. Ramsay County Administrator $8-759