Loading...
10-26-1988 MinutesBOARD OF S~PERVISORS OCTOBER 2fi, 1988 Mr. G. H. Applegate, Chairman Mr. M, B. Sullivan, vice Chairman Mr. C. F. Currin, Jr. Mr. Harry G. Daniel Mr. Jesse J, Mayes Mr. Lane ~. Ramsey County Administrator MS. Amy Davis, sxe¢. ~sst. to Co. Admin, Mrs. Dori~ DeHart~ ~egis. Svcs. and Clark to ~hs Board Firs Departmsnt DeD=ty Cc. Admin., Management Services MX. Robert Hodder, ~r. william H. Howell, Dir. o~ Pl&nnin~ Dir. of News/In~o. Sheriff's Depart~ent ~nfo. Sys. Tech. chief of Police Deputy Co. Admln., Mr. David Welchons, Dir, of Utili%ie$ Dir. of Human Mr. Appleqat~ called the meeting to order at the Courthouse at I. ~OCAT I ON Mr. Applegate gave the invocation. A moment of silen~ prayer was observed for Depu=y Sheriff O. C. Graves, Jr., who was seriously injured in a ~ecen~ accident. The Pledge of Allegiance to the FlaB of the United States of 3. APP~)VAL OF ~iN~TES 3.A. OCTOBER 12, 1988 On motion of M~. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Doard approved the minutes of.October I2, 198E, as submitted. Vote: Unanimous 3.B. OCTOBER 19, 1988 On motion of Mr. ~ayes, ~econded by Mr, Coffin, the foard approved the minute~ of october I9, 1988, a~ submitted. 4. CO~]~I'YADMIRISTRATOR'S CO~$ Sergeant-at-Arms, who was present and expressed appreciation for th, service provided by the Sheriff's Department. Mr+ Ra~$ey introduced Mr. Wayland Ren~ie, President of the Richmond Firet Club, who presented the Board with a copy of the ~988 Preliminary Committee Reports f~om the Club. Mr. Rennie i~trodueed M~. Helen Inconstanti~ Preeident of the Junior Investment Real ~$tate Corporation, who presented a brle~ overview of the Ce~ittee Reports, which future goals and the metropolitan Richmond a~ea. (A copy of said report is Chief ~ane$ intro~uce~ Firefighter William Cr~p who joined a forestry firefiqhting craw f~om Virginia to assist the U. S. areas of the country. Firefightmr Cr~p expressed appreciation ~or the County's co~itm~n% %O %he =ralning program with the Jefferson National Fores~ and mtn%ad he felt the knowledg~ gai~ed from this experience would be invaluabIe to the Depart- efforts in this endeavor. ~r. ~asden announced that Mrs. Pauline M~t~h~ll wa~ elected to the position of Mideasturn ~gional Director of the ~ational Association of County Infc~a=ion Officerm (NACIO) a~ that orgenization~ Annual Conference iA'0k%nge County, California. Mr. Daniel stated be attended the Metropolitan Planning Organi- zation (MPC) and Richmond Rmgional ~l~nning District (RRPDC) meet~n~ at which f~t~r~ transportation, plans for the Southern arem of ~he County were discussed and voted on and mustainad to be included in ail t~¢ MPC studies and the entire MPO study area was empanded to include Renrioo and Powhatan Counties a~ well as other growth ar~as in ~anover County and surrounding communities~ attended the Capital Region Airport COK~i~ien [CRAC) meeting and stated, although the Airport continuing =o experience a sti~ht decline in ai~ traffic aa is nationally~ he felt it is doing very well. 88-797 Mr. Daniel ~tated he £elt the recent press coverage regarding ~he Growth Cont~ittee Report had resulted in unnecessary chaos; that he personally takes issues with any unnamed sources and, in particular, when it is suggested that the qoverning body suppressed information that it had never r=¢eived; is totally frustrated with what has taken place an~ doesn't know the answers but hoped that this committee can be reconYensd to do what they were charged tc do from the beginning -- make recom- mendations on how growth can pay for growth within the County, etc. Mr. Mayas stated he attended the ~duca~ion C~ittee o~ the Information Management Council which is in the process cf organizing and setting its goals~ attended ~h~ Crater Planning District CoI~ission annual meeting; and presented to the Board a certificate from Virginia State University ~×tending their greetings and congratulations to the County on the occasion of the Cornerstone Laying Ceremony for the new Courthouse Building. It was generally agreed the document would he placed in the time capsule which is to be sealed in the cornerstone of the new Courts B~ilding. Mr. Currin stated he also attended the Crater Planning District Commission annual meeting; and repented that, as Chairman of the Growth Committee, a meeting is scheduled for November lC, 1988, a% whluh time the committee will continue to study the ramifications of the Connty's growth problem and bring forward a complete report to the Board. Mr. Sullivan s~ated he also attended thc Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPa) and Richmond Regional Planning District Commission (RRPDC) meeting at which she Water Re~ource$ Task Force presented a drafted resolution r~questing direction from the RRPDC to accept the ~hallenge ef sufficient water ~eseurces as a regional i~sue so that efforts for the future may be handled on a regional basis; attended the Lake Gsnito PACC committee meeting; and stated, although there are legitimate differanca~ of opinion that exist relative to the Growth Co~mmittee Report, h~ felt thi~ wa~ not th~ appropriate tim~ to debate the matter. Mr. Applegate announced Mr. Daniel was appointed as Chairman of th~ ~ina~oia! Committee of the Capital Regional Airport Com- mission [CRAC] at its recent meeting. Ee stated the Growth Co~%mittee Report and the proposed Bond Referendum are Cwo separate issues and ha~e ne synonymy; that the Growth Committee Report issues be addressed at a later date; that citizens need to be made aware of th~ critical nature of the proposals listed on the proposed b~nd referendum and of the critical impact failure to approve this referendum will ~ave upon the COUnty relative to maintaining service levels. C~ANGES IN ~'~u~ O~DER OF PRR$]~NTA~ON On motion aC Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Ceftin, the Board added Items lt.N., Set Public H~aring Dat~ to Consider Con- veyance cf a 1O,O0~ Square Foot Parcel at the Buford Road Fire Station site to Contel Cetlular of Richmond~ Inc~ an~ Authorize Execution Of a Real Estate PurchaEe Contract; ll.O.~ Executive Cassias, ~o consult with legal counsel regarding potential litigation invol~i~g a claim filed by Ms. Beverly C. Eoenig and also Flynn, e% al. versus the Commonwealth of Virginia, et al., pursuant to Section 2.1~344 (~) (6) of thm Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and ll.P., Approval cf a Lease e~ the Airport Restaurant, on an emergency basis, to the Virginia Culinary Group, Inc. and Set Date for Public Rearing for November 23, 1988, at the end of the agenda; and adopted the agenda, as amended. 7.A. DEDICATION OF N~W JAIL ADDITION TO SHERIFF EMM~TT L. WINce On motion of the Board, fha following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Emmett Lee Wing0 became the County's Sheriff in Fiscal Year 1968 with a staff of twelve amployee~ and a budget Of $59,620; and WHEREAS, Sheriff Wingc supervised in excess of ninety-five EmplOyees, with a budget of $3,030,600, operated th% .County Jail, provided Courtroom security and provide~ service for the civil proces~ of law enforcement; and W~ER~AS, Under ~heriff Wingo's direction, the County Jail has bsen renovated twice, the work-release and weekenders programs for inmates were initiated, new Sheriff's facilitlss were planna~ an~ funde~ at the new Courts building, salaries raised for deputies and the County Jail certified by Department o~ Correct,one since 1979; and W~EREA$, Sheriff Wingo wac Presiden~ of the Virginia State Sheriff's Association in t985-~4, served on the ~oard Directors for the Cra~er Criminal Justice Training Acadcmy~ was ~lected "Man of the Year" by the C0neerv~tive Young Republicans in 1987; and W~EP~AS, Sheriff Wingo was only the second Sheriff in the County for ~he past sixty-~hree years and served in this capacity with dedication and distinction; and WsEREAS, Sheriff Wingo was respected and revered by colleagues and fellow Sheriffs across the Co~onwealth. NOW, T~FO~ ~ IT ~SOLvED, that the chegterfiel~ County ~oard of supervisor~ hereby dedicateu the new Juil Annex Addition, which will serve %he County'~ sheriff, Magistrates a~d Police Department~ to th= memury end loyal s~rvice of Sheriff Z~ett Lee Wingo. Voee: Unanimous ~r. Appie~a~e presented %he execu=e~ re~olntion to Sheriff the new jail addition dedication 0n November 16, t98S, 'at ?.B. COUNTY BAi~K OF CHESTERFIELD AND CHESTERFIELD JAYCEES FOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO HALLO%F~EN EVENTS On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: W~ERP. AS, The Chesterfield County ~ark$ an~ R~c~aatiQn Department functions to positively affect the quality ~f life in Chesterfield County; and W~AS, The provision of high-quality special events represents an important component of the Department's s~rvices; and W~ER.~Sr ~he Nasquerade '88 and the Chester£ial~ Jaycees' Haunted Forest represent an en]oyable~ family-~riented cele- bration of Halloween~ as well as serves as a positive and safe alternative ~o trick-or-trea%in~ fo~ the cO--unity; and Jayuees have chuzen to provide significant support for this unn~al co~hnity-wide event. NOW, ?HE~2~FO~E HE iT RESOLVED, that ~he Chesterfield of Chesterfield and the Chesterfield Jayoees for their generon~ contribution to the event and to th~ citizens of Chesterfield County. AMD, R~ IT FURTHER EE$0LVED, that the Board of Supervisors does hereby expres~ its sincere appresiatio~ and 9ratitude to County Bank of Chesterfiel~ and the Chesterfield Jaysees for their goodwill and community concern. Vote: Unanimous Hr. Apple~ate presented the executed r~solutio~s to Ms. Nancy Kaufman and Mr. Thomas H,Caffrey~ J~., President, Chief. Execu- tive Offiser of the County Bank of chsstarfield~ and Mr. Rick Welch of the Chesterfield Jaycees who were present. Mr. C~frey presented the Board with a chunk in th= amount o£ $785. ?.C. MR. SYLVESTER WORTHAM UPON RETIREMENT, ~ENE~AL SERVICES DEPARTMENT On motion of the Hoard, the following resolution was adopted~ WHEREAS, Mr. Sylvester Wortha~ will retire from the Qeneral Services Department, Chest~rfisld County, on October ~0, 1988: WHEREA$~ Mr. Wortham has provided ~iftesn years of quality ~q~EHEAS~ Chesterfield County and the Boaxd Qf will miss ~r, Wortham'~ diligent service; and WHEREAS, Hr. Wortham came to work for the Drainage Depart~ m~nt in t973 from tke sonstruction industry. In May, 1977, he ~o Motor Equipment Opera,or. burinu his tenure with thc County, ha has b~n involved in nnm~rous nelghborhoed cI~an-up campaign~ for which he has received several letters o~ appreci- outstandinq job in recent years working as an act~n~ Labor C~ew Chief du~ing the extensive fall and spring Leaf collection programs. His duties have included supervision and so0rdina- tion o£ a crew of temporary workers hired ~pecifically for leaf oolleotion program. Mr. Wortham has been a good friend and co-worker to his f~llow employse~ and he wall be mi~ed by ~QW, ~H~REFOR~ BZ IT ~SOLVED, that the Chesterfield Co~nt~ Bo~rd of ~upervisors publio%y recognizes Mr+ Worth~ and extandm on behalf of ih~ me~b~r~ and %he citizen~ of Ch~herfi~ld County ~k*ir ~ppreoia~ion for his service the County. AND~ BE IT FURTHER ~SOLVED, that a copy of this tion be presented to Mr. Wo~tham and that this resolution be permaneatly recorded am~n~ the papers of this Board of Super- visors 0f Chesterfield County, Virginia. rico, e~pressed appreciation on behalf of the County for his dedicated and diligent service an~ wished him well in his 7.U. PROCLAIMING DECE~BE~L 2-4, 1988 AS "FLAG FOOTBALL WEEKEND" IN C~ST~BF!~LD COUNTY WHE~tEAS, Thc united Statc~ National Flag Football Associa- tion will hold its 19~ Tournament in Chesterfield County; and WHEP~JLS, Young men and wom~n, r~p~esenting forty-four WHEREAS, Ballparks and playing fields from numerous Chesterfield County parks and SchOOlS will be used during the WBEREAS, To ~hew its interest and support of this national NOW, TKEREFORE BE IT ~SOL~D, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors does officially welcome the United States National Flag Football Tournar~ent an~ proclaim December 2 - 4, 1988 as "Flag Football Weekand" in Chesterfield County. Mr. Appleqat~ pre~ented kh~ e~cu~ea resolution to Mm. Suzanne M~rtin, Lo=al Chairperson of =he National Fla~ ~uo%bal! Com- mittee, and Mr. Bill Carl~on of ~he Park~ and R~cr~a~io~ D~par~ment who were presen~ and will be courdinati~ activitie~ for this event. 7.~. R~COGNIZiNG THE LA~ING OF 9H= CORN~RSTQN~ FOR TBS CHESTERFIELD COURTS BUILDING On motion of the Soard, the following r~sol~tion was adopted: WHEP~AS, The 1986 Met~opOlltan Legislative Tour brough% ~ogether ~he Legislators, Judiciary and ~oard of Supervi~or~ cf Chesterfimld County; and WHEREAS, At this time a n~md for a new courts building for Ches~erfie!d County was reemphasized; and WB=R~AS, The judicial arm of government i~ charged with WHEREAS, The jud~ss of the 12th Judicial Circuit are sDonsibilities with expediency and deci~ivene~ ~EREAS~ During the planning process for our now Court~ Building, our Nation celebrated the Biaentennial of ~e signing o~ tho Constitution o~ the United states which further rein- forces the balancm of the wisdom provided b~ th~ J~dicial, Legislative and Executive b~anches of Chesterfield County the historical Chesterfield County Courthouse and stands as a ~R~AS, The Judiciary, =he Legislatur~, =he Board of Superviso~s~ the A~iui~tration and the citizenry of Chester- field County had th~ forgsfght, vision and planning new Courts Building. NOW, T~EREFO~ BE IT RESOLED, that th~ Chest~rfiel~ Coun=y soard of supervisors recognizes =he laying of the corners%one for the Chesterfield County October 2~, 1988 as a s~bol of p~otection and ju~tic~ for the citizens of Chesterfield COunty now and in the years to come as the County grows and prospers. Vote: Unanimous Applegate stated the executed re~olutton will be sealed in lime capsule at a CornerstOne Ceremony and reception at for the new Courts Building. HEARINGS OF CITIZENS ON UNSCHEDULED MATTERS OR CLAIMS 8.A. MR. JOSEPH PERGERgOM~ JR., R~0VAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS Mr. Hammer briefly S~uriz~d the claim of Mr. Joseph ~ergerson, Jr., for removal of hazardous waste m~t~rials illegally dt%mped on his property and explained that neither the State nor the County ar~ financially responsible ~or removing this waste as the State Code plmces such respoDsibility with the property owner. There was discussion sala=ive to the natmre of the material fs~d o~ Mr. Perger$on's property, previou~ problems ex- perienced by the propsrty owner with ill,gal dumping on his prsperty~ the present status of the situation, whether er not the County has the capability of re/~oving hazardous waete~ legal responsibility for removal .of hazardous waste from ~rivate property, etc. ~r. Currin stated he requested the Board's consideration in this matter a~ he felt Mr. Pergerson has been v~ctimised. Be stated that if thc Board should not see ~it to approve the claim he would like to defer the matter until such time that discnssions can be held with the Legislative Delegation to determin~ what alterna=e courses of action may be available. ~r. ~aye$ stated failure by the Federal, s~aea and local agencies to adequately address the solid,hazardous waste problems is rose!ting in a major oris~s. Mr. Daniel and Mr. Sullivan expressed concern that approval of this claim would set a p~ecedent and concurred that petitioning of action to take at this time. After further discussion, it was on motion of ~r. Coffin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, resolved to table indefinitely consideration of a ~clalm for removal of hazardous waste materi~l from the pruper~y of Mr. Joseph Pergerson~ Jr.; and f~rther th~ Board directed staff to e~plore alternative reso- lutions ~o the situation. WASTE ENVIROSq(ENT th~ Board regarding the County's ~herteomings ~n the waste environment, a copy of ~hich listing is filed with the papers of this ~oar~. The Board directed that staff address Mr. Beadle's s~atemen~ Mr. Mayas commended Mr. Beadles £or his efforts toward resolv- ing problems ih the waste management area. Mr. Daniel stated he wished the record to reflect that Item 17 in Mr. B~=dles' list, xelative to American Tobacco Company, not employer. 9.A. REQUEST TO AID QUEENSMILL CORPORATION IN ACQUIRING SEWER EASEMENT Mr. Sale stated at its September 28, 1988 m~eti~g the Soard, at the request of the property owner, deferred oonsid~rati0n of a request from Queensmill Corpora%ion in acquiring a sewer easement across the property cf Mr. William G. and Mrs. Mary Keegan Han~ke ~o the proper~y owners could discuss the matter with the Midlothian District Supervisor. He stated Qn~nsmill Corporation has been unable to reach agreement with ~r. and Mrs. Haneke. Mr. Sullivan stated his efforts to r~ach aqr~e- men% with ~r. aD~ ~rs. ~neke had also been unsuccess~u!. There was d~scussion relative to alternative me~ho~s for resolving thi~ matter~ further di~cu~ion~/ncgotiations to resolv~ =he problem, the potential use of eminent ~cmain if the sit,atica cannot be r~solved satisfactorily, etc. On motio~ cf ~r. Sullivan, s~conded by Mr. Currin, the Board authorized the Riqh~-of-Way ~anager to aid Queensmill Corpora- tion in acquiring s ~ewer ees~J~en% across the property of Mr. William ~. and ~r~. Nary Keegan ~aneke located north of Huquenct Road and west of Wood,eat Drive, provided the Qorpo~a- tion eh=ers in~o an agreement with the County agreeing to pay for all the cosfs. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currin a~ Mr. Daniel. Abs~eneion: Mr. Mayes. 9.B. STREET LIGHT COST APPROVALS On motion of ~r. Currin, seconded by Mr. ~ulI~an, ~he ~oard approved the installation of street lights at th~ intersections of ~olly Kill Road and Wood bal~ Road, in t_he amoun= of $835.92, and the intersection of Mersden Road and Wood Dale Road, in %he a~ount Of $~,~$6.~9, wi~h funds to be mxpende~ from the bermuda District Street Light Fund~ and denied the installation of ~tr~t lighto at the following locations: 1. Intersection of ~iltmore Drive and Wood bale Roa~, 2. Intersection of M~libu Street and Wood Bale Road, ($2,316,84); and 3. Intersection cf Kosheile Road and Wood Dale Vot~: Unanimous 9.C, APPROVAL OF HEALTH CAKE CONT~ACT$ FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1989 AND A/~ENDMENT OF COUNTY FLEXIBLE COMPENSATION PLAN Mr. ~a~mer state~ at its October 1~, 1988 ~eeting ~he ~oar~ ~e~srre~ consideration o~ the propose~ contract(~) wi~J~ health car~ providers for the 1989 calendar year and an a~ndD~% to the Flexible Compensation Plan from an October 1 - S~ptember 30 to a calendar year cycle and to permit ~taff to prepare various options which could be oonsidered~ necessary budget adjustm=nts costs, and other information for discussion wi~h the Board. There was discussion relative to the health care plans available; plan rate differentials~ the percentages of increases in the plan rates; the employee out-of-pocket costs versus the flat rat~ paid by th~ County: differences in the plan benefits; dif[erenees in the levels of cost; how much funding was allocated in %he budge~ per employee for health care costs for 19~; anticipated future costs; the number of employees covered; the impact of increased Costs to employees; comparisons of Ceuuty policy versus that of various corporate pollcles; funding the h~alth car~ plans during %he budget process for 1989~ employer responsibility to accommodate the increased exp~nse; the need for more information, etarifiea- t£o~, options, etc.; the anticipated increased expenses having insurance; inclusion in the State health care plan; bidding Mr. R~dy de Fr~hn, cf ~ar~in ~. Segal, the County's benefits consultant, briefly summarized the County's recommendations, the causes and effects of significant increases in health ears costs, th% f%asibility of incorporating the County p~ogzsm into the State health care program, etc. After further discussion, it was on motion of Mr. Daniel, employee only and $]~5 per month toward family coverage) as the County Administrator to e~ecute health care contracts for c~lendar year 1989 with KeyCare, Southern Health Services, Equicor R~alth Care Plan and PrnCare Richmond and amended the Flexlble Comp~nmation Plan to change th~ contract y~ar from October 1 - September 3~ to a January I - December 30 contract year, approval of Altsrnetlve "G" wi~h ~he understanding the County would absorb the $126,000 annual cost OVer h~dget for Fiscal Year 89 ~hreugh internal management; and directed staff to bring back ~or the Board's conmideration during the budget process additional ep~icns/machanlsms to address the health Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mayes. Nays: Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Currin. 9.D. POLICY FOR FUNDING WATER AND SEWE~ LINES TO EXISTING SUBDIVISIONS Mr. Sale stated at its October 12, 1988 meeting the Board There was discussion relative to feasibility of utilizing a=cm=~m~nt districts as i~ results in liens being placed against property; citizens involvemen% in the process; the length of ~ims it would ~ake %o pay off a lien i~ an assessment district; the availability of other alternatives: a comparison of various types of assessment distriot~; etc, After further discussion, it was on motion of mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, resolved to defer consideration of policy for funding water and sewer lanes to existing subdivi- sions until November 23, 1988. Vet~: Unanimous Mr. Applegat~ requested that Item tO,, Publio H~arinq To Consider Amendment to the Fiscal Year 1988~89 Budget Appropri- Middle School; and Item ll.G., Consent Items~ be taken out of On motion of ~r. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board ~u~pen~ed its rules to hear Item 10.~ Publio Hearing To Con~ider Amendment to the ~i$cal Year 1988-89 Surge% Apptopri- sting $760]000 in Recovered FUndS for the'RenoVatiOn of Matoaoa Middle school; and Item ll,G., consent Items, out Of sequence. 10. ~U~L~¢ o TO CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO T~E FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 BUDGET APPROPRIATING $760,000 IV R~COV1~RED FUNDS FOR THE R~NOVATIO~ OF MATOACA MIDDLE SCHOOL ~r. Ste~maier stated this date and time had been a~vertised for a public hearing to ¢onaider an ~mendment to the FY 19~-~9 budget appropriating $760~000 of recovered funds to the School Doard for renovations to Matoaca Middle School. Mo on~ came forward to ~p~ak in favor of Qr against the ma~ter. On mo%ion Of M~. Mayas, ~¢eDd~d by Mr. Sullivan, the Beard appropriated $760,000 of Yeeovered funds and $45,000 of int~r~t sarnlngs for r~novat£ons of Matoaca Middle Sohoo1; $S05,000; and requested that the School Board ab$orb, within current appropriations~ $195~000 to cover the cost of renovations to Matoaca ~iddle School, with the understanding that if the School Board does not identify a source of funds within existing appropriations, the Boar~ of Supervisors will appropriate additional funds prior to Jnn~ 30~ 1989. tl.G. CONSENT ITEMS ll.G.1. R~QU~STS FOR ~I~GO/~AFFLE P~R~ITS On motion o~ Mr. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Applogata, the Board approved a request for a raffle permit for the Bra~rmii1 Women's Club for the calendar year 1988. Vote: Unanimous ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR PLAYGROUND ~QUI~MENT I1.G.2,a. C~J~NSBAW EEEMEETkRy SCHOOL On motion ef Mr. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Applega~e, th~ board transferred $1~500 from the Matoaca District Three Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation D~partmant for the purchase ef playground equipment and surfacing materials at Crenshaw Elementary School, whiuh funds will supplement donations in the ~ount of $3,100 from the Crenshaw E~ementar~ PTA. ll.G.2.b. O.B. GATES BL~LENTARY SCBOOL On motion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by ~r. Applegate~ the Board transferred $1,500 from the M~toaca District Three Cent Road Fund to the ~arks ~nd Rscreation Department for the purchase cf playground equipment and surfacing materfal~ af O. B, Oate$ =lementary ScSool, whic~ ~unds wilt supplement donations in the amount of $3,500 from the O. B. Gates Elementary PTA~ Vote: Unanimous ll.G.3. TRANSFER OF FUNDS FOB ACQUISITION OF MICROCOMPUTERS FOR COUNTY-WIDE TRAINING OD motion of Mr. Mayer, seconded by Mr. Applagate, =he Board transferred $45,450 from the Computer Softwars Revenue Account (1A-4~51-1DA~ to the information System Techncloqy Depert~ent's budget for acquisition of microcomputer hardwar~ and software to be used to equip the Information Center to provide e compre- hensive training and support program for County and School employees for microcomputers and user reporting systems. ll.K. CORNERSTONE ~AYING FOR C©URT$ ~UILDI~G AND LU~CH Ceremony/reception for the New Courts Building. Mr. Daniel excused hLm$~lf from the meeting in order to attend the Virginia Department of TransDortation Confersne~ in r~ques%~d ~enewal of Mobile Home Pe~it 83S153 to park a mobile known aB 7724 S~nate Street. Tax Map 67-1O (3) Rayon Park, Block 18, Lot~ 5 and 6 (Sh~t 23). The fir~ p~rmit was i~ued on September 28, 1983. Mr. Jacobsen ~hated ~%aff recommended approval of Case There wa~ no opposition p~esen%. O~ mo{ion of ~r. Currin~ secondm~ by Mr. Sullivan, ~h~ Board approved Case 88SR0229 for seven (7) year~, ~ubject to following standard condition~: mobile hom~. mobile home site, nor ~hall any mob~l~ hcm~ b~ u~d for ~nta-1 property. Only one (1) mobile home zhall be pe~itt~d to be parked on an in~ividua! lot or 3+ Th~ ~i~imum lot size, yard s~tbacks, required front yard, and other zoning requirements of the applicable zoning h~e shall be located closer than ~0 feet to any sxisting 4. No additional permanen=-=ype living ~Dace man be ad,ed onto a mobile h~. Ail mobile homes shall be skirted but ~hall nu~ be placed on a pecan=mt foundation. ~. ~ere public ~C~unty) water and/o~ sewer are available, 6. U~n being granted a Mobil~ ~om~ Pe~it, the applicaat ~hall then obtain the necessary permits from the office of th~ Building Official. This shall be done prior ~o =he installation or relocation of th= mobile home. 7. Any violation of the above conditions shall he 9rounds for revoo~tion of the Mobile ~ome Permit. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currin and Mr. Mayas. Abment: Mr. Daniel. In ~ermuda Magisteria~ District, DO~AI~D ~ ANNE NICHOLSON requested renewal of Mobil~ Home Permit 8~$R14~ to park a mobile home on property fronting the northeast line of Ramona Avenue, approximately 170 feet south of Melba Street, and better known as I0~17 Ramona Avsnne, Tax Map 98-1 (4) Bellmead~, Blo~k 9, Lots 40 th~0ugh 46 (Sheet 32). The £ir~t pe=mlt was issued Jun~ 12, 1974. Mr. Jacobsen ~tatsd staff recommended approval of Ca~e 88SR0230, subject to certain standard conditions. Mr. Donald Nicholson grated th~ rmoe~en~ed conditions were acceptable. There was no opposition present. On motion of Mr. Cnrrin, seconded by M~. Snllivan, the Board approved Cag~ ~8~R0230 for $ove~ (7) years, subject to the following standard conditionm= The applicant ~hall be the owner and occupant of the mobile home. i. No lot or paruel may be ren~ed or leased for use as a mobilm bom~ mit~, no~ ~hall any mobile homo be used rental property. Only one (1) mobile home shall he Debitted to hs parked on an individual lot or p~roel. 3. The minimum lot size, yard setbacks, ~quired froot yard, and ether zoning requirements o~ the applicable zoning district shall be complied with, except that no mobile home shall be located closer than 20 feet to any ~isting residence. 4. No additional permanent-type living spac~ may b~ added onto a mobile home. Ali mobile hom~s shall be skirted but shall not be plac~d on a permanent foundation. 5. Where public (County) water and/or sewer axe available, they shall be used. 6. Upon being granted a Mobile ~ome Permit, the applicant shall th~m obtain the necessary permits from the Office cf the Building Official. This shall be don~ prior tc the installation or relocation of the mobile home. 7. Any violation of the ab6v~ conditions shall be grounds for revocation of the Mobile Home Permit. Ayem~ MM_ Applegate~ Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currin and Mr. Mayas. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 88SN0233 In Dale Magisterial District, ~N~T~ W. O~RACP~ r~q~este~ a mobile home psrmit to park a mobile home On property fronting the southeast line of Old Zion Hill Road~ approximately fe~t south of Canu=e Drive, and better known a~ 6714 Bill Road. Tax Map 65-8 (2] Ampthill Gardens, S~ction 2, Lo~ 66 (Sheet 22). This i~ the applicant's first permit. However, others have pa~ked a mobile home on the property since July 198~. Mr. Jacobsen stated ~taff r~oommended approval o~ Case SSSN0235, subject to certain stands~d conditions. Mr. Kenneth 0verse,s stated the recommended conditions were acceptable. There wes no oppo~ition present. On motion o~ Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved Case $8$N0255 for seven {7) years, subjecn to the following standard conditions: The applicant shall be the owner and occupant of the mobile home. 2. NO lot or parcel may be rented or leased for use as a mobile home site, nor shall any mobile home be ~ for rental property. Only one (11 mobi!s home shall be p~rmitted to be parked on an individual lot O5 pa~¢~l. 3. The minimum lot siz~, yard setbacks, required front yard, district shall be complied with, except that no mobile home ~hall be located ~Io~er than 20 feet to any existing 4, NO mdditiona% permanent-hype livin~ space may be added onto a mobile home. Ail mobile homes shall be skirted but ~hal] no__t be placed On a permanent foundation. ~. where public (County) water and/er sewer are available, they shall be used. 6. Upon being granted a Mobil~ Mom~ ~ermit~ the applicant the Building Official. This shall be done prior to the installation or relocation of the mobile home. revocation of th~ Mobile Rom~ Permit. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currin and ~r. ~ayes. Ab~ent~ Mr~ Daniel. ll.M. REZONING REQUESTS In Midlothi~n Magisterial District, KBCHA~D K. HAWKINS ~%e~ted Conditional Use Planned Development to permit office uses in a Residential (R-IS) District, plus exceptions to paving, setback, and screening requirements. This r~qu~st lies on a 0.44 acre Faruel ~ronting approx~matel~ 100 feet on the west line of Buford Road, approximately 150 feet south of Eazen Street. Tax Map 10-~0 (4) Ben Air Plat, Block A, Lots 9 and l0 Mr. Jacobsen stated staff received a written r~qnest from applicant that Case 85SN0144 be withdrawn. There was no opposition present to the roquogt for On motion of Mr. SUllivan, seeon~sd by Mr. Cu~riDe the Board accepted withdrawal of Ca~e 88SN0144, Aye~ Mr+ Applegate~ ~r, Sullivan, Mr. Carrie a~d Mr. ~ayes. Absent; Mr. ~anie%. 885002 In Matoaca Magisterial District, SHOOS~IT~ BROTHERS, INC. requested Cenditiunal Use Planned Development to allow twa (2) recreational vehicles to be used a~ living q~arters in an AgricuItural (A) District ena 0.5 acre parcel lying approxi- mately 500 feet off the south line of Iron Bridge Road and ap- 1t4-9 (1) Part of Parcel 4 IMheet 31), Mr. Jecobse~ stated staff received & written request from the applicant that Case $$S022 be withdrawn. There was mo opposi- tion present to the request for withdrawal. On motion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Ceftin, the Board accepted withdrawal of Casu SSS022. Ayes: Mr. Appl~gate, ~r. sullivan, Mr. Carrin and Mr. Mayas. kb~nt: ~r. Daniel+ In Bermuda ~agisterial District, ~BBRT W. ~E~$ AND I~OBERT N. ~ENDEP. gON requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to R~si- dential (R-9]. A single ~nily residential subdivision i~ planne~. This request lies on a 9~.0 acre parcel fronting ap- prex~ately 566 feet on the north line of Thur~ton Road, approximately 1,600 feet east of Hopkins Road. Tax ~ap 81-6 (1) Parcel 4; Tax Map 81-6 (2) Squarefield Park Farm~, Lots 12, 13, and 15; and Tax Map St-10 (2) S~arefle~d Park Fams, Lot 17 (sheet 23~. Mr. Edward Wiiley, Jr,, representing the applicant~, requested with4rawa! of Case ~8SN01~7. There was no opposition preaen~ to the request ~or wi~drawal. On motion of Mr. Currin, ~econded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board Ayes: Mr. Applega%e, Mr. sullivan, M~. Cu~in and Mr. Mayas. gSs~004S (Amended) In Clover ~ill Magisterial District, T~DCO-~QU/~LE~-NORT~GATE requested ~men~ent to Conditional Use Planned Developments (Cases 74S021 and 85S002) to permit use e~ceptions. A shopping center is planned. This request lles in R~s~den%ial Office Business (O), and Light Industrial (M-l) Di~trict~ on a 53.0 acre parcel fronting approximately 2,856 f~% On th~ north lin~ of Hull Street Road, also ~ronting approximately 2,448 fe~t on ~he southwest line of ~arbour. Pointe Parkway, and looated in the northwest quadrant of the intersection o~ these ro~d$. Tax ~ap 61-16 {%) 9~rcel ~ and ?art of Parcels 1 and (Sheet Mr. Jacobsen ~tated the applicant desires to ~end th~ Ma~ter Plan and Textual Statement of this case to attempt to address neighborhood concerns. ~e stated ordinarily, a thi~ay (30) day d~ferr~l would b~ iuffici~st ~im~ ~o allow staff to evaluate evaluate any .{erased informs=ion, a ninety (90) day would be moee appropriate. Mr. Jim Thxobald, representing the applicant, s~ated a ninety {90) day deferral was ~r. Charles Smith and Ms. Gail Nixon vuice~ supper% for deferral as %hey felt the u~pllcant was attempting to accede- date the ~eighborhood's concerns. When aske~, ten (10) per~on~ ~tood in ~pport of the re~uest for deferral. ~r. Peter Aadreolettl, representing approximately fif=y (50) persons who were present in opposition to the rezoning, to e~press their views and Ghat the pzQf£ers he submitted by ~ev~mber 15, 1988 rather then December 7, 1988 so they May have adequate time to review the revisions/proffers. A~ter further discussion, it was on motion cf ~r. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayas, resolved to defer Case 88SN0845 until January 11, 19~9; that r~vised material be available no latex than December 1~ 1988; and that said material be diuseminated to all concerned to allow sufficient time fox ~eview and/ox discussion. Ayes: Mr. Applegete, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currin and Mr. Mayas. k~$ent: ~r. Daniel. Th~ Board recessed for two (2) minutes. In Matoaca Magisterial District, J~ E. ~VAN~, ET /%L re- quested rezoning from Agricultural (A} to Li~ht Industrial (M-l) on a 4.9 acre parcel fronting approximately 3~0 feet on the north line of Carver ~eights Drive, approximately 197 feet west of West Booker Boulevard. ~ax ~ap 114-11 (1) Parcel 1 (Sheet 31). Mr. Currin advised the Board that his company is representin~ the landowner in this ease, declared a conflict of interest pUreUant tc th¢ Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act and excused himself from ~h~ meeting. Mr. Jacobsen ~ta%ed the applicant has requested a sixty day deferral. Mr. Jim Evan~ was present to represent the request. There was no opposition to the deferral. Mr. Jacobsen noted deferral to the December 14, 1988 meeting more eguivalent to a forty-fiv~ (4~) d~y ~eferral. ~r. stated this was acceptable. On motion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the ~oard deferred Case 88SN0076 until Daosmber 14, t988. Ayes: Mr. kpptegatu, Mr. ~ullivan an~ ~r. Mayas. Absent: Mr. Daniel and Mr. Currin. Mr. Currin returned to the meeting. ' 87s105 In Midlcthlan ~agisterial Dis=riot, DAVID F. FREEMAN requestsd r~zoning from Agricultural (A) and General Bu~ine~ (B-3) to ~ight Industrial (M-I) ~ith Conditional Use Planned DeVelop- ment. A co~rcial/indu~r~al comple~ i~ planne~. This request lies on a 79 acre parcel 9renting approximately 70 feet on the north line of ~Ull Street Road, approximately t,~00 fee~ east of ~aldwin Creek Road. T~Map 73 (1) Parcel 62 and Part ~r. Jacobsen $~ate~ th~ Planning Commission recommende~ approval of Cnee 87S185, sub,eat to certain conditions. Mr. Ja~es Bubbard, representing the applicant, stated the On motion of ~r. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayesr the Board approved Case 87~10S, subject ~o the following conditions: 1. The following condition~ notwithstanding, the plan pre- pared by J.K. Tigons and Associates, P.C., dat~ April ~0, 19~?, shall be considered the Master Plan. (P) 2. Until public water and sewer are available to serve the entire property, development shall be restricted to the ~outhern~ost s~xteen (16} acres of the site and shall be limited to the following uses: a. Apparel and other finished products made from fabrics, leather and similar materials~ except leather ~nning--menufacturing. h. Cold storage. c. Com~uni~ation studios' and stations (not tower~). d. Cosmetics and toiletries (compounding on- ly)--manufacturing. a. ~lectric lighting and wiring ~guip~ent, communications ~q~ipment ~ {including radio and ~V) and electronic compon~nt~ and accessories--manufacturing. f. Fabricating sheet metal products. g. Freight forwarding, packaging an~ erasing services, not including truck terminals. h. Laboratories and other research an~ de- vekopment facilities. i. L~u~p shades--manufacturing. j. Linole~, asphatt-felt-bas~ and other hard 1. Musical instr~en%s and part~--manu~actur- ing. m. ~aper recycling by ~e compaction method. n. ~en~, pencils and other o~ice and arti~t'~ materials--manufac[ur~n$. o. Pharmaceutical product~--manufaetu~ing. Professional office~. r. 9~ofesslonal, scientific and controlling clocks--manufacturing. ing, v. Wholesaling houses and distributors. to individual sites, ~he following additional uses skall Ail Light I~dustrial (M-l) ~ses plu~ th~ following electrical, plumbing and/or h~ating ~hop~ - sales and service; ~raternal~ phitanah~opic and charitable u~e~ h~alth club~; r~pair services (except o~ automobile); ~hool$ - Co~,~rcial, lounges, dining halls and eight club~; oontrac- recreational establishments, indoor and outdoor; utility trailer and %~uck rental; ~eherinary kQspital, boarding kennels or clinics, exclusive of outside runs; and outside storaq~ in ~Onjunc- ~ion with a use permitted. The eDtire property shall be developed in accordance with the Runts 360 Corridor Overlay District standards. (NOTE: Sections 21-67.17 and ~I-~7.19 of th~ Zoning Ordinance will permi~ certain reductions in side yard setbacks. 4. The architectural style and quali~y of structures shall be similar to that exemplified by development on property in Sonthport along Southlak~ Boulevard, east of Road, and better known es 420 440 Seuthlake Boulevard (Tax Map t7-12 (5) $outhport, Section 2; Lots 2 and 8). (NOTE: This condition is in addition to Corridor overlay District requirements relative to architectural treat- 5. A 100 ~oot buffer shall be maintained along property boundaries adjanen~ ~o agriculturally or residentially zoned property. Other than public roads, and %h~ r~n generally p~rpendlc~lar through this buffer, there shall be no facilitie~ located in the buffer. ~ublic roads and/or utilities which do not r~n lax through the buffer may be permitted upon approval by th~ Planning and/or Transportation Departments. Signs and fences may also be. permitted within the buffer upon ap- proval of the Planning Department. This huller ~hall consist of existing v~getatlon, landscaping, fencing, beaming, topographical co~ditiens, and/or a combination Of ths~e ~lem~nts which will provide year-roun~ screening of the development from adjacent p~0perty. At the time of ~ehemati= plan ~eview for each individual parcel or lot which abuts the buffer, a conceptual landscaping plan shall be submitted for approval. The sonceptual land- gcaping plan shall include the general location of exist- ing vegetation to be retained and the location of proposed veqetation and/ox other screening form~. A detailed land- scaping plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval within ninety (90) days of rough clearigg and grading of each sits. In cases where sub- stantial completion of rough grading is not complete at the end of ninety {90) days, an appropriate extension may be granted by the Planning Department. This condition m~y be modified by the Planning Department if a~pacent ty has be~n monad for a similar u~e. (PAT) 6. Septic tank and dralnfield systems, or other types of on-si~e sewage disposal systems acceptable to the Health Department, shall be designed and construe=ed iu accor- dance with ~ound engineering Standards to ensure adequate on-line sewage ~ispoeal for all =acs. In conjunction with ~ew~g~ disposal system, an engineered plan depicting this requirement shall be submitted to the Health Department for approval. This 91an shall include an analysis of the capacity of soilz %o ~upport the system and prOviSiOn any improvements necessary =o ensure the long ~erm integ- rity of the ~wag~ disposal system, to include back-up sys%ems, reserve drainfields, and any other improvements deemed necessary by the Health Department+ 7. Hydrologic studi*~ shall he conducted to ensur~ that wells can adequately supply on-site water for all uses and industrial processes. The ~udi~s shall provide a deter- minatlon c~ the quality and gnantity of water in the aquifer which underlies the area under consideration. The ditions, and shall conform to the County's standards for Hydrologic Studie~. (~} 8. At such time that public water and/or sewer is located within 500 feat of the site, the owner/develope~ shall extend public water and/or sewer ta serve the entire development and connect all structures to the public 9. Prior to any land disturbing activity, road, drainage, and erosion control plans for the entire property ~hall be submitted to, and approved by, VDOT and ~nvironmental Engineering and any and all easements ~hall be obtained. The approve~ drainage plan shall include permanent tention/detention ponds for all outfelI~, to be installed in all locations where the outfal~s leave the property. These basins shall be designed to retain the 10-your post- development and release the 2-year pre-d~vel0pm~nt oondi- rice. The ratantion/dctcnticn systems shall b~ instmlled by the owner/~vel~per, as d~med necessary by ~nviron- mental Engineering, prior to d~valopment on individual parcels ~rainlng into the system. lO. Prior to the state acceptance of any roads, ownership and maintenance of the retention/detention ponds shall be e~tablished am tho responsibility of private entities, and an indemnification agreement shall bu ~uhmitted to Environmental Engineering Department and approved and tenance, and replacement responsibilities, on completion of th~ detention faoiliti~$, they shall be certified by a professional engineer. (ES) 1t. Dams ~sed to cto~e ~ater shall be designed se as not to jeopardize any downstream dwellings. Ayes: Mr. App!agate, Mr. Sulllgan,.~r. Carrie and Mr. Mayes, Absent: Mr. Daniel, 8~SN0089 In ~atoaea ~agistexial District, CONTINE~T/~L LA~D S~.~ES, IRC. requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-I~). A single family residential Subdivision is planned. This request lies on a 138.0 acre parcel fronting approxlmately 1,760 ~eet on the north line of ~esch Road, approx~ately 5,52~ feet wes~ of Second Branch Road. Tax Map 110 (1) Parcel 6 (Sheet 29). Mr. Jacobsen ztatmd the Planning C~ission race,ended approval of Ca~e 8~SN00Sg, subject to ~ single condition and ~r. Detmonte Lewis, representing the applicant, stated the present~ water and sewer facilities. Mr. Lewis stated public.water facilities will serve this site from the Winterpoek asea, and; although p~l~c ~ew~r faGfl~tie$ are no% available, septic sys~em~ ~sed will be in compliance with the retirements of the Qn motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by ~r. Carrie, ~e Board approved Case 88SN0089, subject to th~ following condition: A fifty (50) foot building s~tback and buffer strip, adjacent to Beach Road (Rout~ 655). The area of this buffer strip ~hall either be left ~n ~t$ natural state, if 8B-813 ~uffici~n% vegetation exists to provide adequate screen- ing; or be planted and/or b~rmed in accordance with a l~n~cape plan approved ky the Planning Department, if sufficient vegetation do~ not exist to provide adequate screening. Pxier to recordation of any plat, the devel- oper shall flag this buffer for inspection, and ~hall post a bond to cover the.implemeneation of the landscape plan~ if such plan is required. Except for approved public road access(es), no access shall be permitted through this buffer strip. Thi~ building setback and buffer strip shall be noted on any final ch~k and recordation plats. The Planning Commission may modify this condition at the time of site plan or tentative subdivision review. (P&T) And further, the Board accepted the following proffered tions: 1. Ther~ shall be no lot recorded with a gross area of less 2. The ~otat lot yield shall not be more than 0.5 units per Ayes~ Mr. Applegater ~r. ~ullivan, Mr. Cu~rin and ~r. May~. Absentz M~. Daniel. 885N0i70 WIRG1N~ requeste~ rezcning from Agricultural (A) =o Re~i- dentlal {R-9) with Conditional U~e Planned Development to outdoor recreational, facilities and liqht co~ercial u~es planned. Thi~ request li~ on a 1~7 ~cru parcel lying approxi- ~atsly 1,100 feet off the ~o~th line of Woolridge Road, also lying approximately 1,300 feet off the w~st line of Woodlake Village Parkway, and approximately 2,500 f%%t north of Hull ~r. Jacobsen stated th~ Planning Co~ission reco~ended approval of Case 88SN0170~ subject to curtain conditions. Mr'. C1Ar~ Plaice, ~epr~enting the applicant, stated reco~nded conditions wer~ acceptable. There wa~ no oppusl- %ion pre~en%. Th~ following conditions notwithptanding, ~u Textual Sta%e~nt, titl~ "~xhibi~ ~ of the ~all Tract ~ezoning Application," prepared by The Planning and Design Collab- orative, Inc., received July 18, 1988, and ameade~ Au~st 16~ 1988: and the map, titled '~Woodlake: Revised Plan (~all Tract), Exhibit G of the Bal~ Trace Application," prepared by Th% Planning and Design Collab- orative, Inc., received July 18, 198~, shall be the Master Plan. {P) 2. Public water and ~ewer shall be used. 3. The developer shall extend a wut~r main along Lak~ Bluff ~arkway. The slzin~ o~ this ~aln shall ~e with the overall water system for ~he expansiQn of Wood- lake and a~jacent areas, and approved by the Department of Utilitie~ (~lanning Section). 4. Th~ Woodlake ~ign Package, as approved subject %o condi- tion by the Planning Cotillion on August 21, 19S4, shall govern ~ignage in thi~ d~velopment, ~t~s$ ~ al%ernaDiv~ sign package is submitted to, and approved by, the Plan- ning Cor~mlsstonJ {P) (NOTE: This condition ~upersedes General Condition l0 in the Textual Statement.} Ayes: Mr. Appi~gate, Mr. Sullivan~ MrS' currin and Mr. Mayas. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 88SN0171 In Clover Bill Magisterial District, OLD DOMINION TIR~ 87S091) to permit s motor vehicle r~pair facility and tire store in an Agricultural (A) Dis=ri:t on a 1.5 acre parcel fronting approximately 413 feet on fha east line of Warbro Road, approximately 1,311 feet south of Genito Road. Tax Map 48-7 (1) Parcel 14 (sheet 131. Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Come, lesion reconuu~nd~d approval of Case 88SN817I, ~bject to certain conditions. Mr. John Clime, representing %he applicant, stated the recom~ended conditions were acceptable. The~ wa~ no opposi- tion present. On motion o~ Mr. Applegkte, seconded by ~r. sullivan, the BOard approved Case 885N0171, subject to the following conditions: 1. Tke following conditions no~with~tandinq, the plan pre- pared b~ Pott~ and Mint,r, ~sted ~ay ll, 1988, shall be considered the Matter Plan for the motor vehicle repair facility and tire store. (NOTE: This condition applies only to the deveiopment of the motor vehicle repair facility and tire store.) The ~etlowing conditions notwiths~andlng, the p!an s~bmit- ted ~ith th~ application for Case S?S091, and approved by the Eoard of Supervi~or~ on July 2~, 1985, shall be con- sidered the Ma~t~ Plan for the sontractor's shop and storage yard and mini-Warehouse .complex. (~). A thirty (30) foot buffer shall be maintained along Warbre Roa~. With the exception of a single access to Warble ROad~ there shall b~ no other facilities permitted in buffer. The buffer shall be land~eaped with ornamental tree~ and shrubs. Any outside storage area ehall be ~creened from view ef adjacent properties and public ~ights of way by ~ither landscaping or fencing. A lan~- seeping plan depicting this requirement ehall b~ ~ubmitt~d to the Planning Department for approval in conjunction with site plan review. 4. Uses permitted ~hall be limited to contragtor'S office, shop an~ storage yard, mini-warehouses, a motor vehicle repair facility, and/or a tire store. There ~ha11 be ne other commercial or industrial activity permitted on ~he site. 5. Sign shall comply with the Special Sign Distri¢~ require~ men~s for Convenience Busineea (B-l} Districts. (P&CPC) 8. Concretm curb an~ gutter ~hall be inst&ll~d around the ~rim~ter of all drlveway~ and parking areas. 7. Prior to release of any building permits, t/ulrty-fivs (35} feet of right of way, measured from the eenterllne of Warble Road, shall be dedlc'ated to and fur the County of Chesterfield, free and unrestricted. '{T) 88-815 B. Additional pavement shall be constructed along Warhrc Road to a~¢onYmodaS~ a right-turn lens. 9. A~ such time that public water and/or .~swsr i~ located within 500 fact cf the site, the owner/developer shall oxtend public water and/or sewer to serve the entire development end convert all ~tructures to the public lO. The previous conditions uOtwithgtmnding, all bulk require- ments of the General Business (B-3] District shall apply. INOTE$: a. The above conditions supersed~ all condi- tions of Conditional Use 87S091. b. Prior to obtaining a building permit, site plans must be submitted to the Planning Department for approval.) Ayes: Mr, Applegate, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currin and Mr. Mayes. Absent: Mr. Daniel. In Dale Magisterial District, C~TERFIE~D COUN~"f BOARD OF S~PER~K/SOP~ requested Conditional U~ ~lann~d D~velopm~ut permit macaroni, spaghetti, vermicelli, noodles and other food preparations and kindred produc~m ~an~fac=urlng in a Light Industrial (M-l) Dis=flor. This request lies on a 120 acre parcel fronting appfoxi~t~ly t,400 feat on ~ha north line Route 2~, also fronting on t~e ~a~t and west lines of White- pine Road, approximately 1,280 fee~ north of Reyoan Road, Tax Map 79-1 (4) Chesterfield Industrial Park~ Section B, Part Lot 1 (Sheets 21 and approval of Cs~e ~8S~0235, subject to certain Mr. Jacob~on, representing the County, sta~ed the r~co~ended conditions were acceptable. Thers wa~ no opposition pre,eat. On motion of Mr. Currln, ~econ~ed by M~. Ma~, the Board approved Case 88SN0235, ~ubject to %ha followlng conditions; 1. sehemati~ plans which confo:m to ~k~ con~itlons 0f zoning may b~ approved by the ~laDnlng D~par~ent. Th~ decisions of the Director 0f Planning, :elatlve to sche~atJ~ plan review, may be appealed to the ~lmnning Co~is~ion. 2. P~lic water and sewer stol5 b~ u~ed. 3. A minim~ s~ven~y (?0) ~oo~ right-of-way, for Ihs exten- sion of Whitepine Road, sh~ll b~ dedicated alig~ent o~ Whltepine Road Extended ~hall be approve~ by the Transportation D~par~ent. (T) Ayes: Mr, Appleqate, Mr, sullivan, ~r. Currin and ~r, Mayes. ~sent: Mr. Daniel. 88SN8236 In Midlo~ian Magisterial Distrist, CHESTZBF1]~LD CO~3NTY re- quested Conditional Use Planned Development to. pormit a 198 ioof tower plus bulk (~etback} e~csptions in a C~unity ~usiness (B-2} District. This request lie~ on a 8.2 acre parcel lying approximately 395 f~et cfZ the north llne of Midlothlan Turnpike, appro×~mately 340 feet east of Buford Road. Tax ~ap 18-16 (1) Part of Parcel 71 (Sheet 8). approval of Case 88SN0236, subject to certain.condition~. Mr. Jay Weinberg~ representing the applicant, stated =eoe~ended conditions were aooeptable. There was no approved Case $$$N0236, subject to the following conditions: 1988~ shall be considered the Master Plan. 2. This Conditional Uss Planned Development $h~11 be granted equipment building. 3. Ail driveways and parking areas shall be graveled and naintained to mlni~izs du~t problems and provide ~ase of ingress and egress. 4. There shall be ne signs permitted to identify this use. 5. The base of the tower shall be enclosed by a six (6) foot high fence, designed ho preclude trespassing. The fence plantings having an initial height ~nd spacing ~o provide sczeening of the base ~ the tower and the equipment building from adjacent properties. A detailed pictinq tkie requirement shall ~e submitted to the Plan- ''' ning Department '~or approval in 'conjunction with final site plan review. (~) copy of FAA approval shall be submitted to the ~l~nning Department. (~) ' ..- 7. The tower and equipment shall b~ designed and in,tailed as not to interfere with th~ Chesterfield County Public Safety Trunked system, Prior to release of e building permit, the applicants shall periorm an engineering study to determine the possibility of radio frequency interfer- ence with the County system and the study shall be s~bmit- tronics staff for review and approval. 8. The ~sveloper shall be re~ponnible for ¢orlecting any Public ~afety Trnnked System. ~uch corrections shall be (FD) ~bsest: ~r. ~aaiel. 88SN01~2 In Bermuda Magisterial District, N~T]~N ~. ~, T~$-r~4~ quested rezoning fro~ Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12). A sinqle family r~side~tial subdivision is planned. This request lies o~ a 42.0 acre parcel fronting in two (2) place~ for a total of approximately 100 feet on the west l£D~ Bermuda Orchard Lane, approximately 3,140 feet south of Bast Hundred Road+ TdX Map 135-1 (1) Parcels 10 and ll (Sheet Mr. Currin advised the ~oard that he own~ land within proximity of the subjeot site which could be affected by this 88-817 development, declared a potential conflict of interest pursuant to the Virgini& Comprehensiv~ Conflict of Interest Act and excused himself from the meeting. approval of Cas~ 88SN0142 and acceptance of the p~offer~d conditions. Ms. Jeff Collins, representing the applicant, stated the present. On notion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes~ the Board approved Case 08S~0141 and accepted the following proffered conditions: l. That any of the hemes built in this residential subdivi- sion will have a minimum £inishe~ gross living area of 1500 square fe~t. 2. Prior to recordation ef lots, restrictive ¢ovenant~ shall be recorded that will ~e equal to the restrictive eove~ nanta previously record~d for Walthall Landing Subdivi- sion. Ayes: ~r. Applegaue, ~r. sullivan and ~r. ~ayee. Abac~t: ~r. Currin and ~r. Daniel. Mr. Currin returned to %he meeting. BBSN0065 In Midlothian Magisterial Uistrict~ ~DF ASSOCIATES AND WILLIAH R. C~W~HOKN requested amendment to Conditional U~e ~lan~ed Development (case 86S092) to allow Convenience Dusinoss ~B-1) uses an4 bulk exceptions. A shopping center is planned. Th~s request lies in a C0nvenience Business (B-l) District on a 9.7 acre parcel fronting approximately 630 fee% on the sou~h line of Rebicus Road, approximately 250 feet southeast of Wiesinger Lane. Ta~ Map 8-16 (1) Parcel 2 (Shes% 2). Mr. Cur~in disclosed ~o ~e ~oard that he is part o~ner of ~he property under consideration, declared a conflict of interest pursuant t0 the virginia Comprehensive ConIlic= of Interest ACt Mr. ~acobson stated the Planning Co~ission has reco~ended denial of Ca~e 88SN0~65, but that staff has reco~nded approval of Case 8~SN006~, s~bj~ct to certain conditions which wo~ld res%riot the t~e of development permitted on the site. Mr. William R. Ca,horn, representing the applicant~, ~tated he was r~qu~st~n9 remova~ Q~ a restrictive con~itlon which requlr- nursing hom~; stated his original application had requested an exception for one (1) stor~ to exceed the t2,000 squar~ foot questing that this portion of ~e request be withdraw; ~x~ just uompensatlon; and requested the Board consider approval of Association, voiced opposition to approval of the rezoning and stated removal of the sole permitted use weald be a breach of fai=h =o the neighborhood. Mr. Bob Riley~ current Presiden~ of expressed cono~rn~ for ~af~ty and t~affi¢ aon~iderations enough strip shopping centers in the general area~ stated the ~ewelop~r was aware of the conditions of zoning when he Opted to purchas~ the p~operty~ indicated residents feel the p~rcel of land was zoned properly now but would be willing to accept an office tYpe development with limited B-1 uses which is more consistent with the Northern Area Plan. Hr. Applegate expressed COncerns relative to legal issues, down-zoning, the ra~ifioation o£ restricted u~es, etc. Ms. Micas stated this ~equest is not considered to be a down-zoning and, in fao~, staff's r~oommendation woul~ increase the number o~ uses permitted on the ei~e. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Moafd denied =he request to amend Case 86s092 a~ approved rescuing from Conv~n£ence Business (~-1) tO Office B~sinees |O) with Conditional Use Planned DeVelopment, s~bject to the foltowin~ conditions: 1. (a; All Office Business (0~ uses, plus the following Convenience Busines~ (B-l) uses: 1) Banks Clothes 3) Floriet shops 4) Optometrists sales and service 5} Savingu and loan Provided that all retail uses shall be limited to e maxi- mu~ of thirty (30) percent of ~he gross floor area of flour within an~ structure and that such u~es ~o not occupy separate entrance units ~n a typical, strip-type building. (b) A nursing home and customary accessory uses, to tb~ conditions of zoning approval for Case 86s092, except as modified herein. (P) Public water and sewer shall be used. Public sewer shall be extended from the exisbing trnr~ p~blic line at the Briarwood Wellness Center. In conjunction with plan review, a hydraulic analysis cf this sewer linc shall be submitted to the Utilities Department for approval. Prior to rmlease cf a~y building permit, a~eq~ate capacity, as required by the Utilitie~ Depar~ent, aha11 be provided. (U) (NOT~: Thi~ condition supereedos ~ondition 2 of Case 86S092~ relative to extension of public sewer and water, for any nursing home.} In conjunction with the approval cf this re- quest, a twenty (20} foot exception to the ~ifty (50) foot parking setback requirement along Robious Road shall be granted, as measured from the existing right of way of Robious Road. Th~ setback Shall be measure~ from the existing right of way of Robious Road, e~ctusive Of the irregularly shaped "right of way boxes." Within the southernmost twenty (20) feet of this setback, trees and shr~he of sufficient height and density shall be planted to minimizo the visibility of paved areas from Robious Road. At a minimum, Iand~caping shall be accomplished in accordance with Condition 4. I 5o {b) In conjunction with the approval of this quest, a thirty {30) foot e×oeptien to the th±fly (30) fQQt rear yard setback for buildings shall be granted. lc) The required side yard setback for buildingsr driveway~, and parking along the western property boundary shall be maintained as a buffer. ~×i~ting vegetation within the buffer shall ba retained where possible and shall be ~npplemented with landscaping, so as to provide year-round screening of the view of buildings and parking areas from the Residential property to the west. Other than landscaping, fencing, irrigation, access as approved by the Planning and T~ansportation Departments, one sign, ~n~ utilities that run generally perpen- dicular through thi~ buffer, there ~hall be no facilities located in the bu{fer. At the time o~ schematic plan review, a con- ceptual land,taping plan depicting these qui~ements ~hall ~e enhmitfed for approval. A dst&fled landscaping plan shall be ~ubmitte~ to the Planning Department for review and approval within thirty (301 days o~ rough clearing grading. The detailed landscaping plan shall include the general location of existing ration tu be retained, the location of proposed through the buffer that depict how screening of th~ use from the adjacent Residential property will be accompliehed. (P) ~xcept as noted herein, the property shall be developed in accordance with th~ Corridor Overlay Distr~ct standards. (NOTE: Thi~ will not require a rear yard setback for driveways and parking areas.) Except as noted herein, signs shall comply with the re- qu~rement~ of the Corridor Overlay District requirements ~tanding ~ign shall be permitted along Robious Road to identify the Sriarwood Wellness Center. The Briarwood Wellness Cente~ Sign shall not exceed an aggregate area of sixty (60] square feet, a height of fifteen (15] ~eet~ and shall comply with Corridor 0verlay District requiiements relative to ~etbacks and lighting. Thc developer shall provide an accurate account of the drainage situation showing ~×i~ting drainage add the impact this development will have.o~ ~he Surrounding area. The developer shall ~ubmit a construction plan to vironmental Engineering pro¥idin~ for on-sit~ and off-site drainage facilities. The plan shall be approved by the Environmental Enginee~in~ Department and VDOT, and all ~ecessary easements shall be obtained ~rior to any vege- tative disturbance. The approved off-site plan may ha~e to he implema~tcd prior to clearing. ~tructu~es shall not exceed a height o~ three {3) stories; e Ei~e ef 10,0O0 square feet each, and shall 'be compatible in architectural style to the adjacent office building to the seuth. (P) This parcel shall be developed u~der the Corridor Overlay Dis~r~ot standards relative to access and internal circu- lation (~aragraph ~-67.~0 of the Chesterfield County Code~. IT) (NOTES: These conditions ~upersede all cend±tinn~ previously impo~d with th~ approval o~ Case 868092 f¢~ any office or commercial uses an the request property. Except as noted herein! all conditions previously imposed with the approval of Cass 865092 shall apply for any nursing praperty. Prior to obtaining final site plan approval or building permits, schematic plans must approval.) Absent: Mr. Currln and Mr. Daniel~ 88SE0056 (A~ended) Residential IR-12) of ~2.0 aor~s, Office Business acres, and Convenience RusiDess (~-l) Of 11.0 acres with office, and single ~amily residential uses, is planned. This req~e~ li~s on a total of 41.0 acres frentlng approximately 840 feet on the south line of ~ull Str~t Road, also fronting apprOximatel~ ~50 feet on Mockingbird Lane, and located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of these roads. Tax Map 51-16 (1) Passels 10, I], and l~ (Sheet 20). Mr. Apple~ete disclosed to the Board that one his a~ociate~ is involved in the sale of the sub,eot property, declared a conflict of interest pursuant to the Virginia C0mprahensive C0nfllc~ ef Interest A~t and excused hims~tf fro~ the meeting. ~r. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission apDreval, subject to certain conditions and acceptence of proffered conditions. Mr. Peele presents~ a summary of the request. Mr. William Hurd, representing the applicant, stated th~ re¢0mmended conditions were acceptable, with. modifications to Condition I1 a~ noted in the addendum, which add~esses all the neighborhood concerns except the complete elimination Automatic Teller .Machin~a (ATM), the ~estriction that all businesses close'at 9:00 p.m., and'a res~ictlan on the use of the northeastern portion cf the property to a bank or office. Mr. Tim Marlew voiced opposition to the proposed B-1 EnDing adjacent to Mockingbird Lane; expressed concern relative traffic cengmstlon~ permitted uses being restrlcSed $o that no bn~inese, with the exception of a restaurant, wo~ld need to be open until midnight; the inappr0Driat~n~es of the requested hours of operation; the potential for crime in the neighbor- hood; the northeastern portion of the property adjacen~ to Mockingbird L~ne being used for bank Or office uae only; restriction of only one (1) telephone booth~ etc. Mr. Mayas stated hs had worked with the developer and area involved had been resolved; stated he felt the developer wa~ entitle~ to the highest and best use of the property but that tbs citizens were also entitled [o a tranquil neighborhood; that the appl~cant'~ proposal and tha ~oneerned neighbors were On motion o~ Mr. Mayer, seconded by Mr. Carrie, the Board approved cas~ ~8SN0056, ~u~jec~ %0 the following conditions: The following conditions notwlthstandipg, the plan pre- pared by Comtek Engineering Services~ Inc.~ dated August lB, 1988, and th~ T~tu~l $tatement, revised Augue~ l~, 198S, shall be considered the Master Plan. [P) 2. Within the Residential (R-12) Tract, lots adjacent to ~ookingbird Mil% Subdivision shall conform with th~ Districts. [NOT=: This condition euper~ed~ the Textual Statement, ~arbour Landing, IV. Proceed Conditions, III, R-12 Parcel, ~. A seventy-five (75) foot buffer shall be maintained along th~ boundary of the Office Business (O) and Convenience Business (B-i) tracts where ad~ecent to the lots in ~oekingbird ~ill Subdivision, and a fifty (50] foot buffer shall be maintained along the boundary of the Office Business (o) Tract where adjacent to other residentially zoned property. E~i~ting vegetation within the buffer shall be retained where possible and shall be supplemente~ with landscaping~ so as to p~ovide year-rOund screening of the view of buildings and parking areas from =he residen- tial tracts. This buffer uhall be provided with a ~eadily available source of water for irrigation purposes. Other t~an landscaping, fencing, irrigation, public reads and utilities that run generally perpendicular through buffer, there shall be no facilities located in the buf- fer. A retention pond shall be permitted within the buffer provided landscaping around this parcel provides year-round screening of ~ommercial and office u~ee from the Residential (R-12} Tract. At the tim~ of schematic plan review~ for any lot or parcel which abuts the buffer, a eonseptual landscaping plan for the entire buffer ~hall be submitted for approval. The buffer may be installed in conjunction with the phasipg of ~he development. A tailed lsnd~ceping plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for r6view and approval within thirty {30) days Of rough clearing and grading. The detailed landscaping plan shall include the general location of existing vege- tation to be retained, the location of proposed vegetation and any fence, and sections through the buffer that depict how screening of' the rear of the B-1 uses from the Res- iden=ial (a-12} Tract will be accomplished. (~OTE: This condition is in a~difion tQ ~he Textual Statement, Harbour Landing, IV. Proposed Conditions, It. O~ice Parcel, 4. within required setbacks along Route 360, all existing vegetation, eight (8) inches in caliper or greater, shall within th~ge setbacks shall b~ planted with a mixture of trees and shrubs. Detailed landscaping plans depicting this requirement shall be submitted for approval in con- junction with site plan review, (P) ~NOTE: This condition is in addition to the Textual States, ant, Rarbour Landln~, iV. Proposed Conditions, I, distribution system shall be designe~ to include a loop, Rock Circle, and an eight (3) inch water lin~ stub in the property boundary. 6. Reade, non-residential building~ or parking lots shall not drain towards Mockingbird Hill Subdivision. 7. ~he drainage flowing towardm Deer Run Subdivision shall be retained on-site, with the relea~ rate based On the capacity of the existing storm sewer and overflow swale to contain the 100 ~ear flood wi+-hin the existing sixteen (16) ~oot easement. Thia capacity ~hall not be exceeded. 8. The owner/developer shell provide an overall master drain- age plan for that area which does not drain tn Route 368 and ~bia plan shall be reviewed and approved by VDOT and the Chesterfield County Engineering Department prior to any vegetative ~ieturbanc~. The approvs~ master drainage plan shall be implemented in its entirety if, by phasing, it does net comply with the conditions of zoning approval. 9. Except where necessary to accommodate drainage and utility improvements, thsre shall b9 no clearing or grading on slopes greater than fifteen (151 percsnt. 10. Prior to, er in conjunction with, the first schematic/sub- division approval, a conceptual pedestrian wat~way plan fnr the ~ntire development shall be submlt~ed to ~h~ Planning Commission rcm approval. This plan shall faoill- tare p~destrian movements throughout the d~velopmen£ an~ to adjacent dsvelopments. The plan shall be implemented in conjunction with development of any site which the pedestrian Bystem. Detailed plane for construction of ~aeh phas~ of the ~yst~m ~hall be submitted to tbs Plan- ning Department for appreval in conjunction wi~h ~ub- mission of final subdivision and/or site plans, ll. Except for the sontheastern~o~t B-1 ~ite which sh~l! be restricted to office uae, the Convenience Bueines~ Tract shall be limited to ~he following a. Bakery b. Hanks and savings and loan a~se~iat~cns, Barber or b~au%y shop. d. Book or stationery e, g. Candy stere. h, Cleaning, pressing, laundry, lanndromats and coin-operated .dry cleaning, not to include a plant. i. Drug store/pharmacy. Dry goods k. Dairy products store. 1. Florist shop, o. Newspaper or magazine p. Nursery schools, child or adult day care cen~er~ an~ kindergartens. q. Offices; business, go~ernm~n~al~ m~di~al professional. r. R~tauran%~ not in¢l~diDg fas~ food er carry- t. Tailoring and dressmaking ShO~S. Telephon~ booth, to be limited to a ~aximum of e~e (1) for the entire d~velo~ment. v. Variety store. w. Video store. Medical clinics provided that neither the busi- ness nor the building is designed to accommodate ambulance traffic. 12. Optometrist sale~ and ~orvice provided ~hat~ (1) The ~at~ and ~rvloi~g of eyeweer is nsc in conjunction with a medical (2) No more than fifteen (%5) percent of the gro~ floor area may be devoted %0 such sales and service, Temporary construction trailers/buildings provided that: {1~ The temporary structure shall be devoted exclusively to construction activities on th~ premi~; and (2) The temporary s~ructura shall be removed upon completlcn or abandonment of construction activities. aa. Veterinary officee provided that: No boarding Ss ~ermitted; (2) No out~id~ run~ ar~ p~rmitt~d; and No overnight care i~ permitted. bb. Motor vehicle accessory ~tore provide~ that~ (1) NO motor vehicle repair shall permitted~ and (2} NO part~ shall be installed on be the on. ~edical or dental laboratories only whe~ provid- ed in conjunction with ~edical or dental offices. dd. Accessory uses, not otherwise prohibited, cus- tomarily accessory and incidental to an~ permit- ted use. ce. Automatic t~lle~ maohinea 'provided they are nc~ free'standing ~nd are incorporated into principal building. {Note: The propert~ lie~ within the Route 360 Corridor Overlay District. Uses with drive-in window~ and/or qa~clin~ pu~p~, are prohibited commercial development of one {1) or more or more.) (NOTE: Thio condition superscd=s the Textual State- ment, ~arbour Landing; III. Bulk and Uss =xceptions, I. Commercial Parcels, Within the office Business (0) Traet~ the following a. All Offic~ Bnsines~ (O) Medical and dental lab0rat0rio~ only when provided in conjunction with medical and dental o~fices. c. Child care centers and kindergartens when sep- aratmd from lots in Mockingbird Hills ~ion by another permitted usa. (P) {NOTE: This condition is in addition to the Textual Statement, Harbeur ~, III. Bulk and Use Ex- ce~tions~ II. Office Parcel, 13. Within the Convenienc~ Business (B-i) Tract, individual stores and shops shall not exceed 5,900 square feet of qro~ floor area if lotated within 200 feet of any exist- ing residential district or area currently zoned agricul- tural and shown on the General Plan for residential and in no case Larger than 8,000 square feet of gross floor arco. Individual projects shall not exceed raunding residential neighborhoods. (B-l) Parcel, Within the Office Business (oi Tract, individual buildings shall not e~oeed 5,000 square feet of gro~s floor area if trier, Individual projects shall net exceed 5,000 square have an arehite~tural style compatible wish eurrou~dlng residential neighborhoods. Compatibility may be achieved through the u~e of similar building massing, materials, (NOTE: This condition is in addition to th~ Tcxtuul Statement, Harbour Landing, IV. Proposed Conditions, II. Office Pafcei, C.) of operation shall be restricted to between 6:00 a.m. and 12:00 midnight. Within the Office Business (O) Tract, 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. (P&CPC) 16. Prior to release of any residential building permit~, th~ rs~trictlve covenants ~or ~he R-12 parcel shall be record- neats unless approved by th~ Plan~inq. Commission. (P) struetur~ larger than sixteen (16) square feet in area located within the fifty (50} foot rear yard setback for The owner/developer shall notify in writing adjacent property owners in Deer Run end Mockingbird Hill Subdi- visions o~ the date and tim~ of any schematic plan er ten=ative subdivision review. (CPC) (a) Prior to obtaining ~ite plan upproval or building permit~, schematic plans mus= be {b) The majority of thi~ request li~¢ within rich: a. one ~tory 1,200 b. one and one-half story 1,430 88-825 except tbs% 'Anuses located on al/ lots adjasent to Mock- ingbird'Hill shall ha~e a minimum of 1,508 square feet. porches, breezeways, decks Or other such amenities. Ayes: Mr. sullivan, Mr. Currin an4 Mr. M~yes. Absent: Mr.'Appleqate and M~. Daniel. Mr. Appteqat~ returned to tke meeting. requested amend~ment to Conditional Use Planned Development (case 87S030) relative to signs. Thi~ rec~est lie~ in Co~uni~y Business (B-2) District on a ~.~ acre ~aroel fronting approximatel~ 572 feet on the ~outh line of Mi~lothian Turn- pike, approximately ~?0 £=ut east of Johnston Willis Drive. Tax Map 17-1t (1) Parcel 2 (Sheer Mr. Jacobsen ~tated the Planning Commission recommended denial of a~sndme~t ~o a Conditional Use Plannsd Development relative to sign9 to permit two (21 freestanding signs, each with an area of approximately 250 square ~set an~ a maximum height forty-seven (47) feet and an excsptinn to requirements to sign lighting, to permit signs with translucent signfields and l~tter~. Mr. Charles 9tringfellow, representing the applicant~ ~tat~d the applicant had mad~ his original request to permit the use o~ two of th~ largest standard freestanding signs provided ~y General ~otcrs~ that the applicant was agreeable to limiting th~ signs to a height of twenty-six (26) feet and an area of 137 square feet each~ that this height and area complied with the current conditions of zoning for the single sign permitted; that his client had already installed the one (l~ such sign currently permitte~; tha~ General Motors will not modify ~heir standard signs to comply with the lighting requirement by the previous zoning case: and to comDty wi~h that standard, There was discussion relative to ~gnag~ requirements, kh~ compatibility of this sign with existing General Motors siqnage %ran$1ucen~ versus internally liqhted signage~ the alternctives available to the use of internally lighted ~iqnaqe a~ p~rmitked Mr. ~ullivan stated he felt more stringent standards were n~e~ed if there were to be improvements to th~ ~ignage problem and he did not see sufficient reason to grant approval of the requested ~xc~ptlon¢. Mr. H~nry Moore, wi~ Bollday Signs, su~arized the difference in cost effectivenes~ of the %~anslucent versus opaque back- ground ~ign~ and ~tate~ he wa~ opposed %0 approval of signs and then restrictions being placed on h~ tho~e ~ign~ could b% lit. After further discussion, i% wa~ on motion of Mr. subject ~o the following conditions: with no more than on8 (1) sign per franchise. 2. To,at a~gregate arsa of the freestanding signs shall not exceed 218 square feet with one (1} sign limited to a maxim~ o~ 137 square ~ee= and one (1~ limited an a 3. Freestanding ~igns shall not exceed a height of thirty (38) feet. 4. The existing (Buick} sign may be internally lighted with a translucent signfield. The other sign shall be internally lighted with translucent letters and an opaque background. Neither sign may be ~xtornally lighted. Ayes: ~r. Applegate, Mr. Currin and Mr. Mayas. ways: Mr. Sullivan. 88S~01~4 BANK requested Conditional Use Planned Development to permit This request lies in Co~unity ~siness {~-2) and Office Business (o) Di~trict~ ~n a 1.02 acre parcel fronting approxi- in~ approximately 280 feet on 01d Buckingh~ Road~ mud located approximately 240 feet northwest of the intersection of these roads. T~ Map 16~8 ~1) Parcel 14 and Part of Parcel 12 (Sheet ~r. Jacobson ~tated the ~lanning Co~ission reco=~nded approval of Case 88SN~164, subject to certain conditions. Mr. John Eenson, representing the applicant, stored thu Condition B which addresses modification to the height area; limited visibility of the proposed sign from Route 60; Di~trlct: ~tc~ Mr. Currin ~xpre~d ~on~ern that the applicant ~hould n~t be restricted to Special sign District standards since his ~ite was not located within a Special Sign Distriut. ~r. Sullivan stat~ he f~l~ ~e Special Sign District should be co~plied with and he could not support deviation from those standards without 0u mQti0n of Mr. Sullivan~ ~econded by Mr. Mayas, the Board approved Ca~e BBSN0164, subject to the following conditions: 1. The following con~itions notwithstanding, ~he plan pared by J. K. Tigons and A~soclates, ~. C., dated June 5, 1988, shall b~ considered %h~ Master Plan for Conveni%nce Sus~ness [~-1) District. Uses ~or the Business (0) portion of the site shall be limited to those bank ~ith drive-in facilities. (P) 3. NO building exterior (whether front, ~id~, or r~a~) will eon~iet of architectural materials inferior in quality, building. Nothing in this section shall preclude the use of different materials on different building (which would be acceptable if representatlv~ .of good of inferior materials on ~ides which face adjoining prop- 88-827 arty and thus, might adversely impact existing or future development causing a substantial depreciation of property values. ~o portion of a building conetructed of unadorned cinder block or corrugated and/or sheet metal shall be visibl~ from any public right-of-way. Mechanical equip- ment, whether ground-level er rooftop, shall be shielded and screened from public view and designed to be perezived aa an integral part of the building, All exterior lights shall he arranged and installed so that direct or reflected illumination does not exceed 0.5 foot candles above backgroun~ measured at the property boundary adjacent to public rights of way. Lightinq standards shall be of a directional type capable of shielding the light source from direct view from any public right-of-way, (~) 5. Driveway~ and parking areas shall be paved with concrete, ~it~/nlneu~ concrete, er other similar material. Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed around the perimeter of all drivewaym amd parking areas. Other curbing material of similar quality like ~rick or cobblestone ~hall be permitted at th~ discretion of th~ Director O~ ~lanning. Drainage shall be designed se as not to interfere with pedestrian traffic. {P) 6. The interior of the parking area Sh~ll be landscaped so as to miDis%ira the appearance o~ a large expanse of pavement as viewe~ from public 7iqht$ cf way. The primary scaping material used in parking areas shall be trees which provide shade or' ar~ capable of providing shade at maturity. Each required landscaped area shall include at lea~t one (1) small tree having an average minimum mature crown e~re~d of greater than twetv~ (12) feet and a mini- mum caliper cf at least 2.5 inches at the time oi plait- ing. The total number of trees shall no~ be less than one (1) for each 200 square feet, o~ ~raotlon thereof, of required in~erior landscaped area. The remaining area shall be landscaped with shrubs and ether vegetative material compatible with the tree landscaping. Land~caped areas shall be reasonably dispereed throughout and located sc as to divide Ch~ expanse of paving. Land~cap~d ar~s shall also define vehicular vereue Dedestrlam circulation. The area designated as required setbacks shall not be included as par: of the required landecaped area~ A detailed landscaping plan depicting this requirement shall he ~ubmi~ted to the Plannlnq Department for approval in conjunction with final ei£e plam review. (P) 7. Within the parking and building setbacks depicted on :he ~aster Plan, landscaping Consisting of a mix of ornamental trees, ~hrubs, and groundcovur shall be plan%ed. At a minimum, landecaping shall be provided in accordance with Landscaping A of th~ Corridor Overlay District standards. A de=ailed plan depicting this requirement shall h~ ~itted to the Planning Dep~rtment for approval in ~en- 3unction with final cite plan review. 8. Signs shall comply with the requirements of the Special Sign District. 9. All utility lines such as electric, telephone, CATV, or other similar line~ shall be installed underground. This requirement shall apply to lines serving individual sites~ as w~ll as to utility linen necessary within the project. all junction and e0eess boxes ehall be screened with appropriat~ landscaping. Prior to the issuance of mn occupancy per, it, a plan shall be submitted te~ and ap- proved by, the Planning. Department showing all utility pad flxturas and meters and the ecreenin~ required herein and such plan shall be implemented. The necessity cf utility ccnnections~ meter bo~es~ etc,~ should b= recognized and in%ogre:ed wi~h the architectural elements Of the site plan. The on-site water main extension ~hall b~ a minim~n~ of eight {8) inches in size i~ the proposed commercial str~c- tufas are to contain ~prinkler ~ystems. 1I. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, sixty (60) feet of right of way~ measured from the centefline Of Huguenot Road, thirty-five (35) fee% of Might of measured ~rom the centerline of Old Buckimgha~ Road Rep ~oeated, and thirty 130) fee% of right of way, measure~ from the centerline of Old Buckingham Road, shall be dedicated to ~nd for ~he~erfield County, ~ree an~ ~nre- ~tricted. 12. There ~hall he nO access to Huguenot Road or Old Buckin9- ham ~oad Eelocated. IT) If access is provided through the adjacent parcel to the south, additional pavement and curb and g~tter ~hal! 0onditions accepted by the Board with the approval of Ca~e 795086. Prior to o~taining a building permit, site plans mu~t be snbm~tted to the Planning Department for approval. plan approval of ~his request.} Mr. Applegate requested tka~ Item ll.o., Exeeutlve Session to consnlt with leqal counsel r~garding potential litigation involving a claim filed by Ms. Beverly C. Koenig and Flyn~, et. al. versus the Conu~onwaalth of Virginia, et. al., would ba plased at end u~ agenda. on motion of Mr. Oullivan~ ~esonded by Mr. Mayes~ the Board suspended its rules to place I~m 11.0., S~ecu~ive Session to consult w~th l~qal counsel regarding potential litigation involvin~ a claim filed by Ms. Beverly C. ~oenig and ~ly.r~., ~t. al. versus the Commonwealth of Vi~ginie~ e~, al., a~ the end ~f the agenda, Ayes: Mr, Applegat~, Mr. Sullivan, M~, Curzin and Mr. Mayer. Absent: Mr. Daniel. ll.~. $~T PUBLIC REARING DATE TO CONSIDRR TO CONS~D=R CONVEYANCE OF A t0,0O0 SQUARE FOOT PARCEL AT TRE RUFORD ROAD FIRE OTATI©~ ~T~ TQ CO~T~L CHLLULA~ OF RICHMOND, INC. A~D AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF A REAL ~STAT~ ~URCHAOE CO~TRACT On motion of Mr. ~llivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Bnar~ 88-829 set the data of November 23, 1988, at 9;00 &.m,, for a public hearing to consider %he conveyance of a 10,O00 ~quare ioct parcel at ~he Baford Read Fir~ Station site to contel CsIlular of Richmond Ins. and authorized the County AdminieSrator to ~xecute a real estate purchase contract for the said con- Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Sullivan, ~r. Currin and Mr. M~ye$. Absent: Mr. Daniel. ll.P. APPROVAL OF AN EMERGENCY LEASE AT THE AIRPORT ~ESTAURANT PUBLIC BEARING FOR NOVEMBER 23, 1988 Mr. Applegate stated the Board would not consider an issue that did not have a prepared agenda an~ de£erre~ it until later ~n the day. 9.E. APPOINTMENTS - BOARD LANDFILL COMMITTEE ~r. Hamme~ stated at its August 24, 1988 m~etiug ~he Deard deferred considsra=ion cf activation of the Beard Landfill CO~mittee until after tbs public hearing on the adoption Of siting and operational standards for debris landfills. ~r. Mayes sta~ed he felt the activation of such a whereby there would be citizen input, would be appropriate beneficial to the County with respect'to having a mechanism for control of existing landfill probleJ~s. Discussions, questiens and comments ensued relative to the purpose and/or charge of the co~mmitt~¢; wh~th~r or net ~ommi~fiee should have the ability fir deeisien-ma~ing or serve only as a consulting cormmittee; inclusion of members of the industry to serve on tAe comities; the e~pansion of the committee's charge beyond the scope of cna landfill Mr. Applugate suggested a two (2) week deferral in order thai ~r. Mayes could bring back a definition as te the charge ef the committee. On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Beard d~ferred consideration of the request to a<tivate th~ C0~muittee until November 9, t988, in order that a charge be authored for the committee. Ayes: Mr. Applegale, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currln and ~r. ~ayes. Absent: Mr. Daniel. .ll.A. CONSIDER ADDING C~LART3R AMENDRBNT TO 1989 ~RCPOSED LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM After brief discussion, it was on metien of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Carrie, r~solved that the Board approve the inclusion of an amendment tc the Charter for the appointment proceEE of the s~hool Board member as currently previded in the County Charter for discusSiOn at the work Session on the prepesed 19~9 Legislative Program on ~ovember 9, Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currln and Nr. ~ayes, Absent; Mr. Daniel. SET DATES FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ll.B.1. ZONING ORDINANCE A~ENBMENT-CATS AND PIT RUZHS On motion of Mr. Sullivan, ~eonded by Mr. Mayas, P-he Board remanded consld~ration of an amendment to the 5oninq ordinanc~ relative to restriction Of %kc keeping of cats and pit bull dogs to staff for study and preparation of alternate ordi- Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Sullivan, Mr, Currin and Mr. Mayas. Absent: Mr. Daniel. COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD.,. ~978, AS AMENDED~ BY AMENDING AND REEnACTInG $~C~IONS 21-77.?(e) and [gl RELATING TO On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mx. Mayer, th~ Board set the date of November 2~, 19~, at 9:00 a.m., for a public hea~ing to ccn~ider an ordinance amending th~ County CO~, by amending and reenaotinq sectione. 21-77.7(e) and (g! relatinq to ~tYuctural ~atbacks frO~ flOOdplains. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Sullivan~ Mr, CuFrln and ~r. ~ayes. Absent: Mr. Daniel. ll.B.3. COURTHOUSE ~QkET~R PLAN On motion of ~r. Coffin, seconded by Mr, Mayas, ~he ~oazd set the data of February 8, 1989~ for a public hearing to consider the pzoposed revised Courthouse Complex Master Plan, Ayes: Mr. Applegace~ Mr. Sulllvau, ~r. Currin aud Mr. Mayas. Absent: Mr. Daniel. TO CONSIDER CONVEYANCE OF PARCEL IN CHESTERFIELD AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL PARK TO CHILDRE~E ~LEI~ PROPERTIES, ZNC. AND AUTHORIZE REAL ESTATE CONTRACT On motion oE Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board ~e% the date of N0ver%ber 23, 1988, at 9:00 a.m., for a public hearing to consider the conveyance of a 7.2 acre parcel in the Chesterfield Airport Industrial Park to Childress Klein Properties, Inu., and authorized the County Administrator to enter into a real estate contract. Ayes: Mr. Appt~gate, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currin and Mr. Absent: Rt. Daniel. ll.B.5. TO CONSIDER APPROPRIATION OF L~AS~/PURC~AS~ PROCEEDS FOR SCHOOL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASES On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by MM, Currin, the 5card set the dat~ of Novenlber ~ 19~, at 9:00 a.m.~fer a public hearing to consider an appropriation totalling $1,080,000 for School Leaae/Purchaa~ proceeds fPr ~chool capital equlpmeat purchases. Ayes: Mr. Applegate~ Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currin and M~. ~ayes. Absen~ Mr~ Daniel. ll,C. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AWARD AND APPROPRIATIONS FOR AIRPORT STATE POLiC~ HANGAR ADDITION AND WAREHOUSE MObiLE On motion of ~r. Mayer, $e¢Opd~d by Mr. Sullivan, the ~ourd authorized the County Administrator to ~xecute construction 88-831 contracts to Nu-way CenPtruction Company/ in the mount of $117,798, for construction of the State Police ~angar A~dition end Kenbridqa ConDtrueeien Company, in the amount of $320,020, for construction of the Environmental Engineering Ware- house/shoD ~od~le; and adjusted appropriations to reflect the necessary fundings as follows: State Police ~anqur Addition, $117,798; Warehouse/Shop moduI~, $320,020* {*the difference between $320,020 and $310,020 [$1o,o00] being for expanses of telephone installation and utility connection fees); and the establishment o~ a contingency in the amount of $12,i82 to meet Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currin and Mr. Mayas. A~sent: Mr. Daniel. t{ENOVATION On motion u.f Mr. Ceftin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board awarded ~h~ ¢ontraG% for the engineering d~sign aud construc- tion ~ualJty control work for the Che~ter Landfill Cover renovation project,, in an amount not to exceed $2~,2~2.22, to Draper-Aden Associates~ and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents to enter into a con~ract ~ith Draper-Aden Associates to complete said engineering services. (It is noted funding for this contract is in the Ayes: ~r. Appl~gate, Mr. S~Ilivnn, Mr. Currin and Mr. Mayas. ll.E. A~POINTMSNTS - RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY On motion of Mr, Sullivan, seconded by Mr. C~rriD, the Board suspended its rules to nominate/appoint Mr. David K. Hunt~ representing Ckpsteriiel4 County a~-larqe, to serve on the Richmond Metropolitan Authority. Ayes: Mr. Applega~e, Mr. Sullivan, ~r. Currin and Mr. Mayas. Absent: Mr. Daniel. On mo=ion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. currin, the soard ~im~ltaneouuly nominated/appuintud Mr. David K. Hunt, representing Chesterfield County at-large, to serve on the Richmond Metropolitan Authority, whose appointment is effectiv~ immediately and will expire September 30, 1992. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, ~r. Sullivan, Mr. Currin ~nd Mr. Mayas. Absent: Mr. Daniel. REQUEST OF USRY, INCORPORATED FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ASSIGN CONTRACT On motion of Mr, Sullivan~ seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board approved a request from Usry, Incorporated to assign its right to receive payment cn a Classroom Traitsr Leaes Contract to First Interstate Credit Allian=~, Inc. ll.H. CO~RUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS ll.H.1. STREET LIGET P~QU~ST On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board approved the request for a street light at the intersection o~ i i Re~more Road a~d Otterdala Road, with funds to be ~xpended from the Clov~r Hill District Street Light Fund. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. sullivan, Mr. Currin a~d Mr. Mayas. Absent: Nr. Daniel. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION COST APPROVALS On motion of Hr. Applegatet seconded by ~r. Sullivan, the Board approved the installation of street lights ~t the fallowing looations~ with funds to bs expende~ from the Claver Hill District Street Light Fund~ l. Tnter~etion of Roll Street ~ead and woa~lake Village Parkway, {$1,762.14}; and 2. Quail Ridge Terrace in the cul-de-sac, ($745.62). Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currln and Mr. Nay~n. Absent~ Mr. bamiel. ll.B.3. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTE~ AGREEMENT FOR TME COUNTY sr. Currin disclossd ~o the Board that he serv~ as a Board men%bar of the County Bank o~ Chesterfield, declared a conflict cf interest pursuant :a the ~irginla Comprehensive C0nflic~ of Interest Act and ~xcused himself fram the meeting. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, ~econded by Mr. ~aye$, ~he Zoard approved and authorized th~ County Administrator to execute maintenance agreement for a Storm Water Management System with the developer for The County Bank of Chesterfield, located in Irongate Shopping Center, a copy of which agreement is filed with the papers of this Beard. Ayes: Mr. ADplegate, Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Absent: Mr. Currin and Mr. Daniel. ROUTE 10 WIDENING F~0M CHIPPBBEdAM PARKNAY TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY COURTHOUSE On mo%ion of Mx. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currln, the Board adopted an amended ~tatement supporting the widening Of Route I0 from Chippenham ~arkway to the chesterfield County Co~rt- hOUSe and authorized the Chairman of the Boer~, or his designee, to present said statement at e public hearin~ to bo held by the Virginia Department of Transportation on October 27, 1~85, at 7:00 p.m., at the Meadowbrook High School Auditorium to consider the proposed widening. (A copy of said statement is filed with ~he papers of this Board.) Absent: Mr. Daniel. ll.B.5. REVENUE SHARING PROJECT DEVELOP~NT SCHEDULE On motion of Mr. Currin~ seconded by Mr. Mayer, the Beard adopted the rotational Revenue Sharing Project D~velepment Schedule for the design of future road improvement proSects for ~iscal Ye&~ 19~9-~3, which plan would be x~viewed and approved annually by the Board! with ~undinq designated ~or each magisterial as referenced by the ~hedule. (A copy of said schedule is filed with the papers of this Board.) ~8-833 Ayes: ~r. Applegate, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currin and Mr. Hayes. Absent: Mr. Daniel. ll.I. UTILITIES DEPARTM~I~T ITEMS 11.I.1. PQHLiC HEARINGS 11.I.l.a. TO CONS/DER C0k~/EYANC~ OF kIGST-QF--WAY A~Q~G ROUTE 10 IN CHESTER TO VDOT Mr. Sale stated this date an~ time had been advertised for a public hooting to consider the conveyance of right-of-way along Route lO to the Virginia Department of Transportation for road improvements at Curtis Elementary, Thomas Dale High and Chs~ter ~iddle Schools. No one cams forward tO speak in ~avor o~ or age!net the matter. On motion of Mr. Curr~n, seconded ~y Mr, Sullivan, the Board apprave~ the conveyance of ~ig~t-o~-~&y to the Virginia Depart- ment cf Transportation for the road improvem~ntn along Route ~0 at Curtis Elementary, Thomas Dale High and Chester Middle ~chools and authorized the Chairman O~ %hs ~0~r~ add County A~ministrator to execute ~-he necessary deed. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr, SuIliven, Mr. Currin ¢~d Mr. Ma~es. Absont: Nr. Daniel. 11.I.l.b. TQ CONSIDER CONVEYANCE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG HOPKINS ROAD TO VDOT ~r. Sale stated thi~ dots and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider the conveyance cf right-of-way to the Virginia Department of Transpo~tatio~ for th~ road im- provements al~n~ ~opklns ~oa~ at Hopkins and Ssmlah Els~entary Schools. No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the matter. approved the conveyance of right-of-way fo the Virginia De- Hopkins Road at Kopkin~ and ~eu!ah Sl~entary Schools. Aye~ Mr, Ap~leg~te, Mr. ~ullivan, Mr. Currin and Mr. Hayes. Absent: ~r. Daniel. · 11.I.2. CONSIDER ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS ARENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIOH 20-23 ~ELATING TO EFFECTIVE DATE OF SERVICE C~L%RGE Mr. Sale state~ this date end time ha~ been advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance amending the County Code relatlve to the effective date of the service charges for Wet'er and wastewater service. NO one came forward to speak in favor of or against the matter. On motion cf Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. CofFin, the Board adopted the £Ql!uwing ordinance on an emergency basis, with the understanding thsre would be appropriate adjustments in billing and set the date of ~ovembor 23, 19~8, at 9:00 a.m., ~or a public hearing to consider said ordinance on a permanent basis: } ~E~CT~NG 8KC~ION 20-23 ~TING ~ B~ IT O~AIN~D ~Y T~E BOA~ OF ~U~R~ISORS tha~: 1) S~ction 28-23 of ~e Code of the County of Chesterfield 197~, ~s amended, is hereby amended t~ road as ~ollow~ Sec. 2D~23. Effective Date of Service Charge. The service charges for water and ~a~eewater shall apply ondinanee. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, ~r. Sullivan, Mr. Carrie and ~r. Absent: Mr. Daniel. Mr. Curri~ expruuue~ uoncern relativ~ to compSa~nts he had increa$=s; =he =detention %Aat such action has placed a har~- ~hip on ~ d~v~lop~r~; etc. After a brief discussion, it was generally agr=~d s=aff wou!d bring forth a ~aper for the ll.Z.3. AUTHORI~ATIO~ FOR RZGRT OF ENTRY BY VDCT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD IMPROVRNENT~ k~b ~T DATRFOR PU~L~ HE~RING'P-0~--C~NVEYANCE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG ROUTE 10 On motion of Mr. Currin, ~oconded by Mr. ~ullivan, the Board approved the request for right of entry from the Virginia Dopar~ont of T~annporta~ion for =he dedications of =~e necessary right-of-way and ea~ement~ across a 20' alley in Chester for the Route ~0 widening ~roject~ authorized County Administrator to sign the optio~ agreement; and set the date o~ November 23, 1988, at 9:00 a.m., for a public h=a~in~ to consider the conveyance o~ the right-of-way. Ayas: Mr. Applogat~, Mr. S~llivan, Mr. Currin and Mr. Mayer. Absent: ~r. Daniel. 11.I.4. CONSENT ITEMS Ii.I.4.a. APPROVAL OF WATER CONTRACT FOR BERMUDA 0RC~ARD LABIE ~ATER LINE EXTENSION On motion c~ Mr. Currin, ~eoondad by Mr. Mayas, the Board approved and authorixed tho County Administrator to ex~eute any n~cessary ~ocuments for the following water contract: Bermuda Orchard Lane Water Line ExtenEion= Contractor; Mayton Con~truation Ce., InC. Total ContZaet Cost: Total Eatimated County Cost: (Refund through connection fees) Estimated Developer Coat: Number Of Conneutiens~ Code: 67,610.00 72,138.00 Futur~ 5B-2511~997 Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currin and NY. Mayas. Absent~ Nr. Daniel. ll.I.4.b. APPROVAL OF WATER CONTRACT PCR LAKE BLUFF PARNWAY AND WOOD BLUFF EARA-WAX WATER LIWE On motion of Mr. Currin, s~conded by Mr. Mayer, the ~oard 88-835 approved and authorized £he'Conn%y A~inistrater to exeoute any necessary 'documents for the followinq water contract: W88-206CD, Lake Bluff Parkway and Wood Bluff Parkway Water Lin~ Developer: Investors Woodlake Development Corporation Total.Contract Cost: Total ~stimated County Cost: {Refund through connection fe~s) E~timat~d Developer Cost: Number of Connections: Coda: $168,252.50 $ 50,351.96 . $I~7,~00.~4 Future 5N-2511-99~ Ayes: ~r. Applega~e, Mr. sullivan, Mr. Currin and Mr. Mayas. Absent: MT. Daniel. ll,I.4.C. ACCEPTANCE 0F D~D OF D~DIOATION ALONG SOUTH BEULAH ROAD FROM MR, RUSSELL A, GRA~4~R On marian of Mr. Currln, seconded by Mr. Mayas, th~ Board approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed accepting, on behalf of tbs CQuDty~ the conveyance of a 10' strip of land along South Beulah Road from Mr. Russell A. Grammar. (k copy of the pl~t is fi~e~ with the papers of this Board.) Ayes: Mr. Applaqate, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Cnrrin and M~. Mayer. ll.i.4.d. ACCEPTANCE OF D~ED OE DEDICATION ALONG WINTERPOCK ROAD FROM VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY On motion of Mr. Currln, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board approved and authorized the County Admini~rato~ ko ex,cute th~ necessary deed accepting, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of a 20' ~trip of land along Winterpock ROad from virginia Electric and Power Company. (A copy o~ the plat ie filed with the paper~ of this DearS.) Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currin and Mr. Mayas. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 11.I.4.~. ACC=PTAN¢~ OF D=~D OF DEDICATIQN ALONG HICKS ROAD FROM JEFFERSON NATIONAL BANK On motion of ~r. Currin, seconded by Mr. ~ayes, the Board apDrovmd and authorized %he County Administrator to execute the necessary deed accept'ing, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of a 30' striD ef land along Bick~ Bo&d from Jefferson National ~ank. (A copy of th~ plat is filed with the Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currln and Mr. Mayas. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 11.I.5. P~PORTS Mr. Sale presented the Beard with a report on the developer ll.J. REPORTS M~. Ramsay presented ~he Board with a status report, on the General ~und Contingency Account, General Fund Balance, Road Reserve Funds~ District Road and Street Light Funds, Lease Purchasa~ an~ School ~oar~ Agenda. formally notified the County of the acceptance 0~ the follewin~ roads into the State Secondary System: ADDITIONS LENCTH POC0SHOCR HILLS ~ SECTIO~ ~ Route 2660 {Ives Lane) - From 0.11 mile south of ROute 21~ to a southwest e~l-de-sac 0.14 Mi. Route 3829 {Eowlin Court) - From Route 2660 to a TO THE VIRGINIA CULINARY GROUP, INC. A~D SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR NOVEMBER 23, 1988 On motion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board applovsd and authorized the Count~ Administrator to execute the necessary documents for an emergency lease betwee~ Chesterfield County and the virginia Culinary Group~ Inc, for operation of a food and beverage concession at the Chesterfield County Airport and a~ended the date for a public hearing to consider said lease on to November ~3, 19~8, at 9:00 a.m, (It was nu~=d this action changed the previously set public hearing date of Novembe~ 9, 1988, at Aye$~ Mr, Applega%e, Nr. ~ullivan, ~r. Currln ~n~ ~r. ~ayes. Absent= Mr. Daniel. Qn motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. C~rrin, =he ~oar~ w~nt inte Executive Session to consult with legal counsel r~garding potential litigatian involving u claim file~ by Ms. Beverly C. Koenig and Flynn, ~t. al. versus the ~o~unonwealth of virginia, et. al., pursuant to section 2.1-344 {e) (6} o~ the Code of Virginia 1950, a~ amended. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currin and Mr. Mayes. Absent: Mr. Daniel. Beconvening: 12. ADJOURNMENT On motion of Mr. Mayas, ~econded by M~ Cu~in~ the Board adjourned at 6:00 p.m. untll 5:00 p.m. on ~ovember 2, 1908. Ayes: ~r. Applegate, M~. Snllivan~ ~r. Curxin and Mr. Mayas. Absent: Mr. Daniel. L~ne B. Ramsay % County Ad~nis=ra=or~