Loading...
11-09-1988 MinutesMr. G~ 0, ~pp~og~, Ch~i~a~ Mr. M. B. Sullivan, Vi~e Chairman ~r. C. F. Currin, Mr. Harry G. Daniel Senator kobe~t ~. Russell, Sr. Delegate Stephen B. Martin Delegate John c. wa~kins Mr. Lane B. Ramsey County Administrator Ms, ~y ~avls, ~xee. A~t. to C~. A~in. Asst. Co. Admin., Aegis. Svcs. and Intergovern. Affairs ~s. Jean bolesal, Clerk tO the Beard Chief Robert Manes, Fire Department Mr. Bradford S. Hammer, Deputy Co. Admin., Managemen~ Services Ms. Alice Heffner, Youth Sv~s. Coord. Mr. William H, HOwell~ Mr. Thomas E. Jacobson, Dir. of Planning Ns. ~ary Lot Lyle, Dir. of AccOuntln~ Mr. Robert Mssden, Deputy Co. Admin., Mr. R. J. McCracken, Transp. Director Mr. Richard McBlfish, Dir. of =nv. =ng. Mrs. Pauline ~itchell, Dir. of News/Info. Info. Sys. Teoh. Col. Joseph Pittman, Chief of Police Mr. Richard Sale, Deputy Co. Admin., Development Ms. Jean Smi:h, mir. Mr. Frederick Willis, Dir. cf Euman' Mr, ~pplogate Galled the meetZng to order a~ 2~0D p.m, (E~T) in the AdmRni~tration B~ilding Confermncm Room [Room 502) and suspended its rules to change the order of work session items ~he addition of an item ~o discuss personnel matters pursuan~ tG Section 2.1-344 (a) (1) of fha Ced~ of Virginia, 1950, as t i Dedication Pelicy; 1.B., Eichmond Regional Planning District Commission Legislative Program; 1.A.~ ~ropo~ed 1949 Legislative Program; and adopted the agenda, as amended. On motion of Mr. Sulllvan, seconded by ~r. Daniel, the Board added an item to the Executive Sea,ion to discuss p~r~onn~l matters pursuant to Section 2.1-344 (a] (1) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. On motion of ~. sullivan, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board went into Executive Session to consult with le~l counsel regarding Robblns, et. al. versus Wessel, et al., Martin v~rsus Neeley, et al.; discussion el the condition, acquisition or use of real property for public ~urDoses or the disposition publicly held property; and dlscus~ion of personnel ~atters, pursuant to Sections 2.1-~44 (a) (6) (2) and (1), respectively, cf the Cod~ of Virqin__i.a, 19~0, a~ Vote: Unanimous 1. WORK SESSIONS 1.D. LA~E G~NITO COMMITTEE REPORT Mr. Welchon~ pre~ent~d a $~n~m~ry of the chronology o~ the Lake Genito project which outlined %h~ inception of the proposed project and it~ eu~ent ~tatue. Cumberland and Ches~ezfiel~ Counties (PACt) with the Appomattox River Water Authority (ARWA); the need for an additional major member jurisdiction's participation in the project; long-range water source for PACC; Cheeterfield's membership in two wa~e= authorities~ the ~aed for General Assembly legislation to make PACC a separate authority; s×pansion of the ~ppomattox River Water Authority; available options ether then the Lake Genite It ~a~ get, rally agreed that sta£~ wou~d prepare a Board pape~ requesting Board ~u~port ~er the County's portion to 9Oin PACC The Board recessed for five [~) minuten, 10C. LAS/D D~DICATION POLICY Mr. Jacobsen presented an overview oi the current and proposed policies en land dedieatioD. Discussion, questions and cOu~ents ensued relative to new proposed policy versu~ the current pclie~; modificatiO~ of the wording "policy" to "practice"; the inequity and piecemeal development r~ulting from the current policy; the impact cf subdivision approvals on the demands for ~chool facilities developer dedication of land to the County fog a school, park or other public use if the residential development the relationship of land dedication to the dreit Growth Committee Repont~ etc. it was q~n~rally agreed to continue the current lend dedication policy until such time as the Legislativ~ Program is finalized and if the Status is not changed at that time the i~ue wonld be brought back to the Board for further consideration. i,B. RICHMOND REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION LEGISLATIVE Mr. Daniel pra~nt~d a su~ary of the two (~) proposed Ie~islative zecorm~endations for the FY1989 Leqislative Program for the Richmond Regional Planning Eistrict Commission and requested instruction from the Board with respect to endorsement of ~aid program~ There was brief discussion relative ho the proposed reeom~endatlone re~arding water resources, planning and zoning, transportation districts, etc. It was generally egr~d that the proposed ~egislative recommendations for the F¥1989 Legislative Program for the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission was appropriate. There was a brief discussion relative to the scheduling of a meeting with the Rescue Squad Association and it wam generally agreed %0 schedule s~id meeting at such time as the consultant's report and o~her pertinent data ~as ~vailable. It was generally agreed ta discuss attendance of the Board and Legislative Dele~atio~ at the Chesterfield Business Council reception scheaulsd for November 22, 1988, during the dinner meeting with th~ D~legation. The Board ~eees$ed at 4:B5 p.m. (~MT) until ~:00 p.m. [~$T) et which time the Boar~ would meet with the Leqi~lative Delegation for a work session/dinner. R@conv~ning: Introductions were mede of those present ~uring dinner. Mr. Micas a~d M~S. De, art presented each program item, and dis- cussion ensued as to the type action to be taken on each prop0~al, sponsorship, etc. (A copy o~ the Proposed Legisla- tive ~roqram is filed with the papers Of this Board.) Due %o a previous commitment, Mr. Currin excused himself from the meeting. Mr. Appleqat~ stated thuse it~ms~ with the exception of ~hose deleted, were specifically agreed upon by the Board of super- vi~ors a~ the Legislative Packet to be presmnted to the General Assembly. There was d$~cussien relative to the che~terfield Bnsine~ Council Reception scheduled for November 22, ~988, and it was 'generally agreed to attend, Room (Room 13~( for its regularly ~ehedule~ meeting at p.m. (SST). Mr. Applegate called the r~qulerly scheduled meeting to order at 7:15 p.m. (EST). 4. INVOCATION Mr. Applegate introduced Chief Robert L+ ~ane~ who invocation. gave the 5. PLEDGE OF A~LEGIANCE, TO T~ FLAG OF -x~u~ ~NITED STAT~$ O~ Mr. Applegate introduced Cub seco% Troop 850, St. Auqumtin~'s Catholic Church and Cub Scout Troop 865, ~he~bourne Methodist church, who were ~re~eot o~s~rving the meetin~ to lead Pledge of Allegiance to the' Flag of the United States of America. 6A. 0CT0~RR ~6, 19~8 On motion of Mr. ~ayes, zeeondefl by ~ullivan~ the Board Absent: Mr. Currin. Absent: Mr. Ceftin. ~r. Ramsey introduced Chief Robert L. tames who presented Board members and County Administrator with copies of th~ Fire Department's Yearbook co~emorating the Depar~men='s 60~h Anniversary. ~r. Ram~ey congragula~ed Ghief E&nes and his $%~££ QD ~0 years of successful, dedica~ed public service to the community. Mr. Ramsey recognized members o~ Bey Sco~t Troop 874 of St. Luke's United Methodigt Church who were present observing the meeting. Mr. Daniel stated he a=te~de~ the Metropolitan Economic Development Council (MEDC) m~eting at which th~r~ were presentaBien$ zeta%ire to =he marketing Of the Richmond Metropolitan area and attended the Virginia ~ighway Co, rereDos meeting at which ther~ were discussions relative to th~ status of unappropriated highway funds and who~e re~pOg~ib~lity i~ would be for re_~]oval of hazardous wastes found to be dumped in 88-843 rights-of-way purchased by the Virginia Department of Transports%fen. Mr. Mayas stated he attended ~he Appomattox Basin Industrial Development Corporation (ABIDCO) meeting at which a committee was appointed to draft a paper relative to the organization's positiou regarding landfills and the safe disposal of solid Mr. Sullivan stated he attended the Lake Genito Committee meeting at which future water resources for Chesterfield County were discussed and indicated a report would be forthcoming. 9. R~QU~STS ~O i~)BTPONE ACTION, C~N~n~S IN TU~ ORDER OF P~S~NTATTON On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board deferred Item 10.A,, Resolution Recognizing Mr. Douglas A. Nyce for hi~ Contribution to the Chesterfield County Preservation Committee, tc'December'14, 1988; revi~d ~tem.]4~B.3.~ Requests for Bingo/Raffle Permits to include five ad~itlonal requests; added Item 14.E.6.g.~ Approval of Change Order Nuafuur 1 for Cohtraet WST-98E, ~nters Ridge/Genito Road Area Water Line Project; added Item 14.G., Appropriation' Cf Funds for Sh%lter for Battered Women, to be hear~ prior =o ~t~m 14.A.; and deferred Item 11., Hearings of Citizen~ on Unscheduled Matters or Claims, Mx. Ben Lingerfalt - Compensation for Desaruction of Poultry to December I~, 19S~; and adopted the agenda, as amended. kyes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. sullivan, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mayes~ Absent: M~. Currin. ~0.~. MR. DBMUS M. OXFORD UPON ATTAINING RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by M~. Sullivan~ the following reso~utlon was adopt~: W~E~A~, Th~ Boy ~QQUtS Of America ~as incorporated by William D. Boyce on February 8, 191~; ~nd WHERE~S, The Bey Scouts cf Am®rise was founded to promote citizenship training, personal developmen~ and fitness of individuals; and WtEP~AS, After earning at least twenty-one.merit badges in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial %o his community, being ac=ive in th~ troop, demonstrating scout spirit and living up te thC.SCOUt Oath an~ Law; W~ER~AS, Mr. Demus M. Oxford, Branch's Baptist Church, Treop 8Ol, has accomplished those high standards ef commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by less than two percent o~ those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and himself on the great accomplis~ents of his County, D~us indeed a member of a new genuraticn of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. County Board of 'Supervisors hereby ~xt%nds it~ congratulations County to haue ouch an outstandin~ young man as one of its citizsns~ 88-844 Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Daniel and Mn. Mayes. Abeentt Mr. Coffin. Mr. Daniel presented the executed resolution to M~. D~mus N. Oxford ~nd recognized family members whe were present. t0.C. PROCLAIMING NOVEMBER 14-20, 1988 AS CEESTERFIELD COUNTY YOUTE WEEK On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the following resolution wam adopted: WHEREAS, The Board of Supervisor~ ~ukDowle~gos the importance of positive and healthy youth d6velopment in Chesterfield County; and WNEP~EAS, The Board of Supervisor~ cr~at~d a Youth Services co--unity to promote the well-beinf of young p~ople~ and WHEREAS, The Youth Service~ Cor~ission draw~ on the exemplary talents, oon%r~t~ent and dedleation ~f youth and co~nunity m~bers to organize programs addressing the needs of WHE~AS, The Board of Supervisor~ recognizes the effortm of the Y~ukh Services Co~i~ion amd Optimist Club of Jamem River to stimulate conmtructivm activities for youth~ and W~EREAS, The youth of Ch~Rterfield County d~vote exceptional %im~, ~nmrgy and spirit to their co--unity through volunteer work, exkca~urMicular activities and indivi~u~l acts; and WN~AS, The Chesterfield co,unity has an obligation to be aware of the aceomplimhmen~m and meeds of their youth. NOW, T~ER~FO~ BE IT RESOLVED, ~ha~ the Chesterfield recognizing the contribution o~ Coun=y youth and focusing public attention upon issues affecting youn~ people will be AND, ~E IT EURTHER RESOLVED~ that ~ovember 16, I988 will b~ Youth Awards Night to honor youth for their couza~e, comRassion and service by recognizing thom .with the 'O~tstandlng Youth of Chesterfield County" award given by ~ You~ Services 'C~isslon o~ Chesterfield County and the Optimist Club of J~es River. Ayes: Mr. Appl~gate, Mr. Sullivan, ~r. Daniel and Mr, Mayas. Absent: ~r. Cc=rim. McClellan, Chai~an of the Youth Set,ires CQ~ission, and Es. Alice Heffner, Director of the Office on Youth, who w~r~ 10.D. MRS. PATRICIA TOMASIE~ MR. STONBE TRACEY AND MRS. CAROLYN ~LDW~N, EDUUATOK~ AT MIDLOTEIA~ HIG~ ~C~OOL On motion of ~r. ~ullivan, ~eoon~e~ by Mr. ApDlega=e, the following re~olutlon was adopted: ~%~EREA$~ Educators are sha~ged with the responsibility u~ providing a nurturing, learning envi'renment in which our young people may dev~lop into ~killed productive adults; and 88-84~ WHEREAS¢ Edueskors are faced with the difficult challenges responding effectiv~Iy to parents and the co--unity; and WHEREAS, In light of these challenges, Chesterfield County Schools reflects a system of educators who carry the vision and dedication to muut the overall individual and ~duca%ioDel needs of the children; and WBE~AS, Chesterfield County educmters are well aware of and prepared fo handle within the School environment the children; and WHEREAS, On October 20, 198~, staff from Midlothian High potential to endanger the safety of the etudents~ other students and faculty; and WHERHAS~ Mrs. Particle T~masik i~ediately responded to the student in a calm, supportive mamner which resulted in preventing harm to the student and others; and. WHEREAS, Upon the arrival of Mr. Stoner Tracey, and with the continued assistance cf Mrs. Tomasik, was able to coax the ~tudent into relinquishing the firearm; and WHEREA~, The i~sdiate safety needs for all ~tudan%s and to the di~%raugh~ young man. County Board of Supervisor~ hereby recognizes Mrs. Particle T~asik, Mr, Stoner Tracey and Mrs. Carolyn Baldwin for their safety and well being of all students and faculty in Midlothian High School. A~, ~E IT FURTHER ~SOLVED, tha~ tk~ Chesterfield Counky Board of Supervisors recognizes Mrs. Tomamik, Mr. Tracey amd mducatorm in the Chesterfield County School System who fo~ l~arniDg a~d a compassion for the physical and ~motional well being of all young people. Absent: ~r. C~rrin. Mr. Sullivan pre~ented the executed re~otution~ to Mrs. Patricia Tomasik and Mr. Stoner Tracey who wer~ present and recognized Ne. darolyn Baldwin who was unable to attend. O SOLID WASTE ADVISORY BOARD Mr. Ham~er misted ~-hat at the October 26, I988 meeting~ %_h~ Board 4alerted consideration of reestablishing the Solid Waste Advisor~ Board so that a charge be proposed for the committee and presented %o %ks Board for consideration. Di$¢ueeion~ ce~ents and questions ensued relative tc the purpose, m~mbe~ship and authority for the committee; the combining of the proposed commit%es wi~h the currently active Richmond Regional Solid Waste Task Force; the overlapping of the two committee~; modification of the proposed membership of ten members to five members and County-wide representatives es opposed to magisterial representatives; etc. ~B-846 Mr. Mayas made a motion, seconded by ~r. Daniel to establish Solid Waste Advisory Board, comprised cf five members appointed ~ertainin~ to policies at all g~vernmental levela concerning the safe disposal, management, transportation and control of solid waste in Chesterfield County and advice the Board of Supervisors of all matters pertaining tc ciUizen involvement in the delivery of solid waste diepo~&l services for which Chesterfield County is r~spcnsible. There was further discussion rc!a~ive to overlappin9 of duties and reepansibilities~ modification of the committee, On motio~ of M~. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Doard deferred consideration of activation of a Solid Waste Advisory Board until November 23, 1988. Ayes: Mr. Applegafe, Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Daniel. ~ays: ~r. The Board recessed for fiv~ (5) m~nutes. Reconvening: ~r. Currin arrived a% the meeting. 13. P~LIC HF~%P~I~G8 13.A. 88S005 IBVIN G. BOBNEE~ ~LATOACA DISTRICT 885O05 In Matoeoa Magisterial Die,riot, IRVIN G. HO~N~R requested Conditional use to permit a landfill in an Agricultural (A) District on u 55 + acr~ parcel fronting approximat~l7 ~0 f~et on the south line ~f ~ull ~%reet Roa~, approximately 3,000 feet west of Skinquarter Road. Tax Map 72 (1) Par% of Parcels ~ an~ 16 {Sheets 18 and 27). Rr. Jacobsen eta=ed the Planning Commission recommended daniel of Cae~ 8~E005; howe~er, staff reco~nd~d approval based on the f~ct that the Western Area Land Use and Trans~oxtation Plan agricultural~fore,tel use and the race--ended conditions in~ure proper operation and reclamstioD and will minimiz~ the impact on existing an~ future area development. Ha pre,anted a b~i~f sn~ary of the ze~e~t, outlining the propo~d use, ~he wi~ potential for landfill 4~velopme~t, etc. ~s indicated approximately 37 signatures in opposition. ~r. Bob Beep of J.. K. Ti~o~s and Associates, representing the proffers and stated %he applicunt feels h~ has adequately ~4dressed previously stated concerns uf area r~si~ents. ~e stated the race--ended conditions ~er9 acceptabl~ with the exceptio~ of Condition 10. ~e furthe: stated that it was his provide flexibility, in lcca=ing any .future collector road ~y~tem in ~he area of the request site. 88-847 Mr. Jacobsen noted ~hat Condition lO could be modified to cl~ri£y hhah only th~ land£ill boundary need be secured as the proposed use; that he felt the proposed site wee an appropriate location; and that he did not intend to sell the property as the p~oposed business is a family business and those la.lily members involved will share integrally in the operation of the busineee. ~r. Maynard Burkette~ III voiced support for the proposed request 5taring that four lane roads such as Routs 360, or other w~ll-devsloped primary roads, are preferable and safer than utilizing secondary road~ for the disposition o£ debris landfill materials. Nr. Darvin Satterwhite, representing Ms. Harriet; Hornet who own~ property surrounding ~he subject site~ Mr. George the Winterpoek Civic Association; Mr. John Mizell, Ms. Margaret Wa;kine; Mr. C. R. Max~ll; Mr. D~nnis Horn~r; Mr. L. L. Cashion; and Mr. Paul Terrell voice~ opposition to and requested denial of the proposed request as they felt it may cause well water contamination; depreciate property values; monitored; expressed concerns relative to adequate fire protection capabilities bain§ available from sources oth~r than Landfill Study, which was pr~$enteO to and adopte~ by the Board, and new regulations/standards implemented by the Department of Waste ~a~agement have added to th~ requir~ment~ this application versus the standards of t~e Department of Waste Management sRO the-Debris Landfill Stud~; stated the Planning Co~iggion did not have the benefit of such ~nfo~ation when i% reviewed thi~ request: ~=utioned the r~liabil~fiy of clay liners; suggested modification~ to the proposal that, if approved, the use be permit;ad ~or five y~ar$ versus ten (10) yearsr e~c. Petitions with approximately 235 signatures of residents opposing ~his r~qu~s% ~ubmitted. Mr. ~ornef Sta~ed h~ did not ~eeI the proposed u~e would if approved, would be beneficial tO future co~ercial Mr. Daniel ~tated he fel~ all =hose involved have made every %hat if the rpques= were approved a preuedent would be ~et to proposal fail~ %o meet th~ t~st of continuity of zoning; th=re is no mupport from any neighboring landowners for approval of th~ r~quest; that, i~ compelled to vote on against it as he ~id not con~ider ~t in the best interes~ app~ov~d~ he would like to see conditions i~po~ed r~lative stronger policing,, oontrols, liability, dec,eats;ion, reporting, off-site road improvements, and that ~he p~rmit 8~-848 Mr. Carrie expressed ee~er~s ~elative to the period of time for which the permit would be granted; that the permit granted to rte applioant only and not be transferable or run with the tend; the source of water n~c~ary for a~equate fire protection; the reliability and durability ef clay liners; the filing of restrictive covenant~ to identify the conditions of zoning for any potential new ewnerz and/ur 0peretors of the proposed facility, etc. Hs stated ha felt the Stale and have implemented/adopted etrinter standards which minimize risks and tho i~aues have been addressed. Mr. Sullivan stated he supported the request as he felt the facility would be needed sooner than anticipated but expressed concerns relativ~ to the training of ~uploysss not being addressed by either the County or State criteria; slated he fel~ the filing of restrictive covenants to i~entify the conditions of zoning for any potential new owners and/ox operators of the proposed facility shoul~ ~e required; that the ~er~it be non-tranuferabl~ and would cease if t/us property wer~ sold; and that the permit bs granted for five (5) years versus ten (10) years with the applicant having the option to renewal of the permit a~ the end of fi~e (5) years. Mr. Applegate expressed ~onoern~ relative to bonding; the capacity of existing landfills; th~ n~o~$$ity for an additional landfill facility; whether~ or not thio application met the newly adopted County ~%andard$ as well as the Sta~e requirements; access and reed imprevements~ revocation of th~ p~rmit if ~h~ applicant ~ee~ not comply with %he uo~dltlens of zoning; and stated he felt tho~e concerns had been adequately addressed. Nr. ~aye~ expressed his appreciation tu the Matoaca Distric~ citizens for their interest and involvement r~lati~e to this rezoning request. He stated'when this ca~e was firs~ presented to the Board for consideration he requested that it be denied in accordance with ~he ro0ommen~atien of the Planning Co--lesion; he stated ~taff originally race--ended denial of oertain ~ondition~ and proffers ~hich were offered by the going tO change very much; that there is a great ~ear in areas where people are on well water thou= adding new landfills as may have an impact on the quality of the water and that there had been inseasitivity toward =he area res~dent~ who live within close proximity of ~he proposed landfl]l+ ~ additional landfills in Chesterfield County b~se4 Qn the landfills already approved and operating, the capacity for the n~xt 5 Or IQ y~ars, the fact that Richmond R~glonal Planning District and the Crater Planning District Co~ismicns as well as other agencies are ~orking Qn n~w' t~c~nologies to bmtter solve the disposition cf solid wa~te~ ~tc.~ and based on those facts, he felt adding additional landfills would not help that the Planning Co--lesion did not hay9 ~h~ beaefit of such Mr. Mayas made a motion, seconded by Mr. Daniel~ to remand Case review and comparison with the ~tandard~ cf the Departmene of Waste Management am~ the Debris Landfill Study. Ayes: Mr. Mayas. Mr. Mayas made a motion, ~econd~d by Mr. Daniel, ~0 ~Dy Case 88S005, IRVING. 88~849 Ayes: Mr. Daniel and Mr. Nays: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Currin. There was further discussion relative to enforcement, adequate policing cf the site, non-transfer of the permit, etc. Mr. Currin made a motion~ seconded by Mr. Sullivan, to approve Case 88S005, IRVIN G. SOONER, subject to the following conditions: The following COnditions notwithstanding, the plan prepared by J.K. Timmons and Associates, P.O., revised Novel%bar 3~ t988~ and submitted to the Planning Dspartment on ~o~ember 4, 1988, and the T~xtual Statement submitted to the Planning Department on October 26, 1988, shall be considered the Master Plan. 2. Within the required buffers, existing vegetation and/or topQgraphy shall be supplemented as necessary to provide yeas-round scresn~ng. Other than utilitiee and access which run generally perpendicular through these and a fence, ther~ ehalI be no other facilities located within theses buffern. LanOsuapinq, including existing vegetation, within the buffers around the perimeter of the first phase of d~velopnent or individual cells, (i~e., acres}~ shall have an initial height~ density, and be of a species which'will provide yaar-reund screening when installed. Landscaping and/or, harming and/or existing vegetation within th~ buffers around the perimeter of each subsequent phase of development or individual cell shall have a height, density, and be of a ~peeies which will provide year-round screening at the time that landfill operations begin within each phase. Prior to =he beginning of landfil~ operations within. ~ach phase or cell, the huffere shall bs ~lagg~d and the Planning Department contacted for an inspection. The limits o~ buffers shall be defined to preclude dumping and grading within tho buffers. Also, there shall be no filling or grading ~ermitt~d in buffers except that necessary to accommodate utilities, 'access. and/or landscaping, A detaile~ plan ~epicting these requirements shall be submitted to the Planning and ~nvironmen~al ~nglne~ring Departments in conjunction with final plan review. {P) 3. The plan of development shall, at a minimum, comply with the requiremeut5 c~ the Sitin~ and 0~erational Standards for Debrim Landfills in Chesterfield Countv, and all appendices. The final plan of dsvelopment shall be ~nbr~itted to, and approved by~ Environmental Enginee~ing~ the Planning Department and the Stats Department of Waste Management. Upon final approval, th= doc~mcnt shall as th~ plan and operational program for =he landfill. Any restrictive and appropriate to this facility shall bm incorporated into the approved plan and operation program. regulations ~shatl remain in effect. Prior to, or in operational progxa~s, such request shall be submitted to implementation of any amendment, ~he Planning Department ~hall verify that the amendment is in compliance with tbs approved plan and operstional program. 4. Standard and Specification 1.26 ~edimuat basins shall be Environmental ~ngineering Department. 8~-850 The area of puralitted landfill activity and buffer area~ shall be clearly defined by a permanent means. The method of delinea%ion shall b~ approved by the ~lan~ing Dependent. {P&~) Prior to any vegetative disturbance, all necessary off-site easements downstream of the afiected drainage area shall be obtained. (EE) Hydrcseedin~ and/or seeding ted mulching shall be finished grade of each cell or area. Prior to any vegetative disturbance, all necessary ~anagement, Environmental Engineering, and th~ Planning Qepartment shall be acquired. One (1) entrance road shall be permitted in the locatio~ generally depicted On the M~ster Plan. The entrance road shall be hard surfaced for a length of 250 feet from Hull Street Road. Further, the entrance road shall be %0 preclude the view of landfilling activity from Hull Street Road and secured to prohibit indismriminate ~ping of materials. The land~{ll owner/operator shall be responsible for the removal of any mat~rlal$ dumped either the access road or along ~ull Street Road adjacent to the subject property. Further, the landfill owner/ operator shall be responsible for removing dirt and debris from Hull Street ~oad resulting from the operation of the landfill. A procedure for controlling dust shall be submitted to the Environmental ~ngineering Department for approval an~ sha~l be implemented in. con]unction with landfillinq activity. Measures to correct d~$t control problems shall be taken within twenty-four {24} hours of notification by the County. (ER&P) (Note: The requirement~ of th~ .$i~iny and Operational Standards for Debris Landfill~ in Ch=mterfield County r~qui~e %ha% the en~ance road be paved to the gate house.) 10. The la~dfill boundary shall be secured by p~rman~n~ msans (i.e., fencing, etc.) to preclude vehicles from entering the property at any point other than the single entrance road. The exact means of Securing the boundary shall approved by the Planning'Dspantmenf at the time of ~it~ plan approval. 11. The plat shall i~dioate ths de,ired sequencing of events for the properhy implementation of erosion control devices in conjunction wish the.p~an of operation. 0nly one cell shall be in operation (i~e., receiving debris) at any time. Only three {3) cells shall h~ active at any ~ime; one (1) open cell receiving debris, one (1) constructed cell undergoing clo~ure and s~abiltzation, and one (1} cell being prepared to r~celve debris. 12. This Conditional ~se shall be granted ~or a periQ4 of %im~ net to exceed tsn (10) years from date of initial operation and may be renewed by th~ Board of Supervisors u~on ~emnnstrat{on that ~he operation has b~en cf no 13. ~rior to the issuance of a building permit, 100 feet of riqht~of-way~ meas~f=d from the =~nterlin~ of ~ull Street road along the entire property frontage, shall be dedi- cated to and for the County of Chesterfield, free and unrestricted. (T) 14. Prior ~o any filling on this site, additional pavement shall be installed on Route 360 to a~¢ommodate left- and Prior to site plan approval, ~D access plan for this paz~el and the uurrounding'paroels shall be e~bmitte~ to, and approved byr the Transportation Department. I6. A plan for boarding up the exterior and repairing the roof of the existing house shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Preservation Committee prior to any lau~ disturbing activity. (Prepe~vation Committee) 17. The a~proved ee~dition~ Me~ter Plan and ~eXtual Statement cheil be recorded on the deed as restrictive covenants prior to final' plan approval. (Note: Site plans must be submitted to, and approved by, the Plan~ing D~partment for each phase of the fill activity.) An~ further, the Board accepted the following proffered conditiens~ I. A waiver of finsnsial obligations relative to bonding requir%ments of the Commonwealth o~ Virgini~ will not be requested. 2. Data regarding groundwater and surface water monitoring will be maintained a the project There was further discussion relative to paving of the eDtrance way to the proposed site, the granting of the permit to onl~ the applicant versus it be granted to run with the use of the land, etc, Ait~r further discussion, Mr. Daniel mad= a substitut~ seconded by ~r. Sullivan, to approve Ca~e 885005, IRVIN HORNER, subject to the following conditions: 1. The following condltiohs notwithstanding, the plan ~repared by J.K. Timmons an~ Associates, P.C., rev~s~ November 3, I988, and submitted ~o the Planning Department on November 4, 1988, and the Textual Statem~n~ to the Planning Department on October 26, 19~, shall be aon$idered ~e Master Plan. 2. Within the required buffer~, existing v~getation and/or ~opography shall be supplements4 as necessary to provi4e year-round screaming. Other than utilities and access which run generally perpendicular ~hruugh tAes~ buffers, and a fen~e~ there shall be no ~%he~ faeili~ia~ located within theses' buffers. Landscaping, including existing vegetation, wi~in the buffers ~round the perimeter of ~h~ first phase of d~Pelopment om individual cells, (i.e., acres} ~ ~hull have an initial hei~ht~ density~ and be o~ species which will', provide yeas-round screening when installed. Landscaping and/or berminq and/or exiuting vegetation wi=hln ~ buf~erm around the 9erlm~t~r of each subsequent phas~ of developmen~ or individual c~ll shall have a height, ~nsity, an~ be o~ a sDeci~ which will provide year-round screening at the time that landfill beginning of landfill opera%ions within each phase cell, the buffers shall be flagged and ~e Planning Depar~nt =ontactsd for an inspection. The limits of buffers shall be defined to preclude dumping and grading within the buffers. Also, th~r~ shall be no iilling or grading pe~itted in bu~ers except t~a% necessary to acco~odate utilities, access and/or landscaping. A detailed plan depictin~ these requirements shall submitted to th= ~lanni~g and ~vizonmental ~ngln~ring 88-852 ~part~ents ~ conjunction with final plan review. 3. The plan of developm@nt shall, at a minim~, comply with the requirements of the Sitin~ and Operational Standardm for Debris ~andiills in Chesterfield Count~, and all appendices. The final plan of development ~hall be submitted %o, aud approved by, ~nvironmental Engineering, the Planning D~part~ent and ~he State Department of Waste Management. Upon final approval, the document ~hali as the plan and operational program for the landfill. Any subsequent regulatioms imposed by the State Department cf Waste Management er adopted by the County that are more restrictive and appropriate to =his facility s~all be incorporated into thc approved plan and opeu~tion program. If subsequent regulations adopted by the State Department of Wa~t~ ~anagem~nt are less restrictive khan th~ approved plan and operational program, then the more reat~ictive r~gulatians shall remain in. ~ffeo~. Prior to, or in conjunction with, an7 request ko the State Department of operational pr~gramz, such request ~hall be submitted to ~mplementatlen of any a~endment~ the Plan~inq Depar~ent shall verify that the ~ndmen% is in compliance with ~e approved plan and'opera%tonal progr~. 4. standard and Specification 1.26 ~edim~nt basins ~hall iD~talle6 in those locations de,ed necessary by th~ Enviro~ental Engineering D~pa~tment. shall bu c!early defined by a pe~anent mean~. The me~hod o~ delineation shall b~ approved by the Planning area ~halt be obtained. 7. Hydro,ceding and/or see~inq and mulching ~hall completed within fifteen (1~) day~ after achieving finished grade o~ ~ach cell o~ area. ~. Pri~r =o any vegetative disturbance, all necessary Depar~ent shall be acquired. (~) 9. One (1} entrance road shall be pe~itted in ~he location shall he har~ surfaoed for a length of 210 feet from Mull to preclu4e ~he view of landfilling activity ~rom Hull Street Read and secured to prohiblk indiscr~inake dumping to ~he subject property. Further, the landfill owner/ operator shall be responsible for r~movlng dirt and debris landfill. A procedure ~or controlling d=st shall be approval and shall ba im~l~ented in conjunckion with D~obl~ms shall be ~ak~n w~thin twenty-four (2~) hours (Note: Th~ requirements of the Siting and Operational Standards for Debris Landfills in Ghesterfield County require that t~e entrance road be paved to the gate house.) 8~-@53 10. The landfill bOUndary shall be secured by permanent means (i.e., fencing, etc.) to preclude vehicles from entering the property at any point other than the single entrance road· The exact means of securing the boundary shall be approved by the Planning Department at the time oi site plan approval. 11. The plan shall indicate the desired sequencing of events for the property implementation of erosion control devices in conjunction with the plan of operation. Only one (1) cell shall be in operation (i.e., receiving debrisl at any time. Only three {3) cells shall be active at any one (1) open cell receiving debris, one (1) construe=ed cell undergoing closure and stabilization, and one (1} cell being prepared to receive debris. ~his Conditional use shall be granted for a period of time net to exceed .ten (1O) years from "date of initial opera,ion and may be renewed by the Board of Supervisors upon demonstration that the operation ha~ been of no detriment ~o adjacent and area properties. 13. Priur to the i~suance of a ~uilding permit, 10O fee~ of ri~ht-0f-Way, measured from the cent~rline cf Hull Str~t road along the entire property frontage, shall be dedi- cated to and for th~ County of Chesterfield, fre~ and ~hall b~ installed on Route 360 to accommodate left~ and righ~-curn lane~. 15. Prior ~o sits plan approval~ an access plan for this parcel and the surrounding parcels shall he submitted to, and aPProved by, the Transportation Department. 16. This conditional Use shall be granted to and for Irvin Homer only and shall not be transferable nor run with the land. (Not~: Site plans must b~ submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Department for each phase of ~he £ill activity.) And £urther, the Board accepted the following proffered condition$~ A waiver of requirements requested. financial obligations relative to bondin~ of the Co~onw~tb o~ Virginia will not b~ Data regarding groundwater and surface water monitoring will be maiu~i~e~ a the project ~ite, Mr. Currln stated he felt the propcued re~oning; with the modifieation~ as stated, wag far superior to the presen~ me,hod of handling landfill problems and it would b~gin to address illegal dumping. Mr. Applegate called ~or the vote. Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Ceftin, Mr. Daniel an~ Mr. Mayes. Nays: Mr. Applegate· The ~oard recessed ier five (5) minutes. 88-854 13.~. TO CONSIDER THE PROHIBITION OF ANY TRUCK OR TRUCK AND TRAILER OR SEMI-TRAILER COMBINATION EXCEPT A ~ZCKU~ OR PANEL TRUCK FROM USING FALLOW DRIVE FROM COURTHOUSE ROAD TO DEE~I~LD DRIVE AND D~BRFI~LD DR~VM ~ROM FALLOW DRIVE TO ROUTB 10 Mr. Ap~legate stated this date and time had been advertised for a public he,ring to consider restriction of through truck traffic es prepoaed. Ms. Ann Martin~ Mr. Ji~ Roqer~; MaSter Natthew Martin; Mr. Tim Sowder; and ~r. K~nny Ray voiced support for the through truck traffic restriction as proposed as they felt tkere is excessive tandem truck traffic through the neighborhood which is disruptive, pru~¢nts a safety hazard to n~iqh~orhoo~ children and requested consideration be given to accelerating review of the situation by the Virginia Department of Transportation. The ~card indicated it felt this issue should be addressed by VDOT on a priority basis d~e to the construction of Rou~e 2SS. On motion Cf ~r. Mayas, seconded by ~r. Carrie, the Board adopte~ the ~oltewing rssolutlcn~ ?~EP~AS, the Chesterfield county BOard of Supervisors has received requests from citizens to restrict through truc~ traffic on Fallow Drive (Route 2035} from Courthouse Road to Deerfield Drive and Deerfield Drive (~ou~e 2006) from Fallow Drive to Route 10 by any true~ or truck and trailer or s~i-trailer combination except pickup or panel trucks; and W~EREAS, the construction activities associated with Route 288 have increased the truck traffic on the~ ~tr~et$; and WHEREAS, the Hoard has COnducted u public hearing on the question. ~0W, THeReFORE, B~ IT ~SOLVED, that ~he Board o~ 8upervisor~ requests tho Virginia Department of Transportation to re~tric~ ~hxough truck t~affic on ~allow Drive and Deerfield Drive. BE IT FURTHER R~SO~VED, that the Board requests tho Depax%men~ to giv~ thi~ request the hlqhest priority of any of 13.C. TO CONSIDER THE ARRR0PRIATIO~ 0P $3~500,000 TO UNDERTAKE AGQUI$1TION AND I~BTALL~T~ON OF A ~HO~RAP~IC ~LANAGE~ENT INFOR~ATION SYST~ FOR T~E ~UBL~C UT!LIT~ DBPARTMENT AND COUNTY G~EERAL FUND DEPARTMENT~ Mr. R~m~er ~tated this date and time had huun advertised for public hea~ing to ~onslder th~ appropriation o~ $3,095,000 for the acquisition and installation ~ a geographic information system for the Utility and General FUnd departmen~e~ There was considerable ~ieoussion relative to the feasibility and appropriat=nuuu of I~ase/purchase agreementn; th~ inclusion of this issue during the budget process and %he need for of the technical aspects of On motion of Mr. Daniel, seo0n~ed by Mr. Mayas, the Board appropriated a total of $3,095,000 in lease purchase finance proceeds for the purpose of acquiring and in, tailing a geographic information system ~cr the public Utility and County 88-855 General Fund departments. Utility Fund will pay the entire amount of the debt service totaling $201,935 annually for the FYi0-91; General Fund b~g~n~ing in F¥1992 will pay $480,000 annually; an~ the Utility Fund $S6,000 for a period of seven (7) years Ayes: Mr. App~egat~, Mr. Daniel and ~r. M~ye$. Nays: M~, S~llivan and Mr. Currin. 14,G. APPAOPKIATION OF FUNDS FOR EHELTER FOR BATTE1%ED WOMEN On motion of Mr. Sullivan, aecon~ed by ~r. ~ay~s, the ~oar~ appropriated $40~000 from the General Fund Balance to the Ri=hmend Area i~CA, for the period of January 1, 1989 throuqh December 31, 1989, to fund ira portion of the operating expenses ~or a shelter for battered women to be located in CheSterfield County, which program i~ being provided through the combined e£~erta of an anonymous donor for the necessary building, the United Way of ~reat~ Richmond and the Richmond Area YWCA, which organizations approved funding to assist with developmental s~rvice~/eos~ and administration Of the program. Vote: Unanimous 14.A. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC B~ARI~GS 14,A.1. TO CONSIDER A~ND~NT TO T~E CABLE FP.%NCHISE AGR=EM~NT WITN CHESyERFIBLD CABLEVISION ~STOEBR) TO ELI~INATE TNE COUNTY'S PROGI~4~ATIC CONTROL OVER STOPPERS CHAENEL OFFERINGS There was discussion and it was generally agreed, since ~ public bearing was not rpquired, it would not be scheduled. On motion of Mr. Daaisl~ seconded by ~r. Sullivan, the Board adopted and author±zed the County Administrator to e~eoute an amendment =o the Cable Franchise Agreement with Chesterfield Cablevi~io~ (Storer) to eliminate the County's programmatic control over Storer's channel off,rings. (A copy of said agreement i~ filed with the papers of thi~ Board.) 14.A.~. TO C©~$iD=R AN 0RDI~A~CB TO A~4B~D A~D R~NACT SFCTIO~ 8-17 OF TH~ CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, I978~ AS A~E~DED, EELATI~ TO T~E k~PLICATION DATE FOR TAX RELIEF FOR THE On motion o~ Mr. Sullivan, S~conded by Mr. Coffin, the Board adopted the followi~g ordinance on an emergency basis and the date of December 14, 1988~ at 9:00 a.m., for a pablie hearing to consider said anendmen~ on a permanen~ basis: AN ORDINANC~ TO A~AND R~ENACT SECTION ~-17 OF xu~ (IODE OF x~ ~OUNTY OF C~E~-r~acFIE~D, ~ IT 0~AIN~D by th~ Bo~rd o~ Supervisors of Ch~¢t~rfi~ld County: (I) That Section 8~17 of ~he Cod~ of the County follows: Sec. 8-17. Procedure for claiminq exemption. (a) The person O~ p=~9ons claiming s~ch exemption shell ~ile ann=ally with t~ co~issionez u~ reven~e of the county, on forms to be supplied by the county, an affidavit Setting forth the names of the related persons occupyinq such real ~state, the total co, iced net worth, including equitable interest, and the combined income from ell sources of the person or persons seeking to qualify. The commissioner of the revenue shall also make such further inquiry of persons seeking such exemption, requiring answers under oa~h, as may be reasonably necessary, including producbicn of certified tax returns, to determine qualification therefor. Such affidavit shall be filed not later than April 1 of each year provided that such application may be filed no later than December 31 of each year by first time applicants or in cases of hardship as defined by the commissioner. If each person is under sixty-fly, (65) year~ of age such ~Qrm shall have attauhed thereto a certifioation by the social Security Administration, the Veteran's Administration or the Railroad Reti~emout ~oard~ or if such Der~on is not eligible for certification by any of these agencies, a sworn affidavit by %wu ~) medical doctors licensed to practice ~adicine in the cc~%~on~ealbh~ ~o the effect that such person is permanently and totally disabled. The ~fi~avit of~ at least one (1) cf such doctors shall be doctor. The affidavit of one (1} of such doctors may be based upon m~dical info~mation contained in the records of the civil service commissioner ~hich is relevant to the standards ~or ~etermining permanent and total disability. Such affidavit shall be filed no later than April 1 of each year. (b} Bush ~xempticn may ba gr~nted ~or any year following the date that Eke head of the household occupying such dwelling an~ ownin~ title or partial title thereto reached th~ age of sixty-five (65) y~ars. ChaAg~s in respect to income, financial worth, ownership cf property ar other factors occurring during ~he taxable year for which the affidavit ia filed and having the effect of exceeding or Violating the limitations and conditions provided herein shall nullify any exemption for the then-current taxable year and the taxable year i~ediab~ly following~ provided, however, that a change in ownership to a spouse less than sixty-five (65) years of age which ~e~nlt~d uolely fron the ~eath of hi~ or her qualified spouse shall result in a prorated exemption or deferral ~o~ the %hen-ourr~nt taxable year. such prornte~ portion shall be determined by multiplying the amount of the exempticm or deferral by a fraction wherein the nu~er of complete month~ of the year such property wa~ properly eliqibl~ for such ezemption or d~ferral ~e the nUmeratOr and the number twelve 112) is th~ denominator. {6-27-79; 11-4-79, S~ction i; 3-12-~0, Section 1) Vote: Unanir~onm 14.A.3. TO CONSIDER AN OPJDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE ROUTE 1/301 DISTRICT AND TO AUTHORIz= ISSUANCE OF R~/E~qUE BONDS On motion of Mr. Currin~ seconded by Mr. Sullivan~ th~ Board set the date o~ D~G~er t4, 19~$ at 9:00 a.m. for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to establish the Route 1/301 Sewer Assessment District and to ~onsider adoption of a resolutie~ authorizing the issuance of $653,fl0~ in revenue bon~s to fund the project. Vote= Unanimous td.B. CONSENT ITEMS 14.B.1. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE This day the County Environmental ~ngineer, in accerdans~ with directions from this ~oardi made report in writinq upon his examination of Dri~geside Drive, Koufax Drive, O'zalley Drive 88-857 and Labin~ Court, in Stoaebridge, Sec%ion 1 and a portion of Irongate, Section 2, Dele District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr~ Sullivan seconded by :Mr. Mayas, it is resolved that sridgeside Drive, Roofer Drive, O'Malley Drive and Labine Court in Stonebridge SeOtiOn 1 add a portion of Irongate, Section 2, Dale District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that thc Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System~ ~ridgeside D~ive, beglnnin~ at the intersec=ien with Irongate Drive, State Route 3025, end going westerly 0.21 mile to the inter,action ~ith Koufax Drive, then continuing westerly O.0~ mile to the ~nterzectien O'Malley Drive; Koufex Drive, beginning at the intersection with Brid~aside Drive and go%ns northerly 0.09 mile, then turning and qoing w~t~rly 0,11 mile to thg intere~e~ien wX~h 0'~allQy Drive, then continuing westerly 0.03 mile to end in & deed end; O'Mallay Dr~ve, beginDing at tko intersection with ~ou~ax Drive and qoing southerly 0.08 mile to the intersection with Labine Court, then continuing southerly 0.07 mile to. the intersection with Bridqe~ide Drive~ then COntineing ~ou~herly 0.0~ mile to end in a temporary turnaroand; and ~abine Court, beginning at tho intersection with 0'Matley Drive and going northeasterly 0.04 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This req~es~ is inslusive of ~t%e adjaeenu slope, sight distance a~d designated Virginia D~partment of Transportation drainage easements. And be it ~u~ther resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of the~e roads. The~e seotions of Stonebridge and a portion of Irongate are recorded as follows: Ston~bridge, Section 1, Plat Rook 56, Pagm 43 and 44, March 6, 1987 Plat Bock ~0~ Page ~0~ December 14~ 19gl~ Ironqate, Section Votes Unanimous This day the County ~uvironmeutal Engineer, in aeeordenee with directions ~rom this Board, made report in writing upon his ex~miRation o~ DQ~NQOd Avenue, Tri Gate Road, Yard Arm Drive, North Light Driv~ Dockside Drive and Passage Way Drive in Somerset Sections 3, 4~ 5~ 7 end 8~ Matoaca Dietriot. U~en consideration whereof, and On motion of Mr. seconded by ~r. ~ayes, it is resolved that Dogwood Avenue, Trl Gate Road, Yard Arm Drive, North Light Drive, Dockside Drive Matoaca District, be and they hereby are established as public And be it further =esolved, khat the Virginia DeparP-~ent of Transportation, be and i~ hereby i~ requested to take into Avenue, S~ste Route 874, and go~ng westerly 0,13 mile to the 0.13 mile to end in a temporary runaround; ~ri Gate Road, aonte 1181 and qoin~ northerly 0,0l mile to the intersection continuing northerly 0.0~ mike CO the intersection with Dogwood AvEnue, then turning and going northwesterly .0.0~ milo to tho intersection with Yard Arm Drive; Yard Arm Drive, beginning at the inter~ection with ~ri Gate Road and going northeasterly 0.08 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. Again, Yard Arm Drive, beginning at the inter~cSion wi~h ~ri Sate Road and going southwesterly ~.11 mile tc end in a temporary turnaround; North Light Drive, b~ginnlng at the interee0t±0n with ~ri Gate Road and going ~outhw~$terly 0.13 mile to ~nd in a temporary turnaround. Again, Morth Light Drive, beginning ~t the intersection ~ith Tri Gate Road and going easterly 0.05 milo ~o end in a sul-de-$a~; Dockside Drive~ beginning .at the intersection with exieting Tri Sate Road, State Route 1151, end going ~as=ez!y 0.04 milo to end in a cul-de-sac; and Pam~ageway Drive beginning at the northern end of existing ~aasageway bri~e, State Kou~o ~460, and going northerly 0.0@ ~ilo to end in a cul-de-sac. Again, Passageway Drive, boglnning at the southern end of exiztiag Passageway Drive, S~ate Route 3460, and going southerly 0.10 mile to tie into proposed Somerset Section 9. This request is inclusive of adjacent slope, eight distance and designated Virginia Department O~ Transportation drainage easements. These roads asrve 122 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervi~o~m, guarantee~ to the Virginia Department of Transportation a SO' right-of-way for all of these roads. These sections of Somerset are recorded a~ fDllo~s: Section Section 4. Section 5. Section 7. Section 8. Plat Book 48, Page 54~ January 29, 19S5. Plat Book 49, Page 69, Juno 20, 198~. Plat Book 45, Page 69, April 26, 1984. Plat BOO~ 51, ~ago 43, ~ovember 6, 19~5. Plat Beok 53, Pag~ 61, ~uly 15, I~86. This day th~ County Envirornnental Engineer, in accordance with direction~ from this Board, made report in writing upon bis e~amlnation ef Llama Lane and ~lkvlew Dr~ve in Bexley Cosmopolitan Phase VII, Clover Bill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Sullivan and seconded by Mr. Mayas, it is rssalved that Llama Lane and Elkview Drive ia Boxley Cosmopolitan, ~hase VII, Clover Hill District, be and they hereby are establimhed as Dublic roads. And be it farther resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Llama Lane~ beginning at existing Llama Lane! State Route 3156r en~ going westerly 0.08 mile to the intersection with Elkvi~w Drive, then continuing westerly 0.07 mile to end ~n a cul-de-sac; and Rlkvlew Drive, beginning at =he intersection with Llama Lane and going northerly 0.06 mile to end in a temporary turnaround. Thi~ request i~ inelU$1vo of the adjacent slope, sight dietance and designated V~rginie De,afferent of Transportation drainage These roads s~rvo 22 lot~. And be it f~rther r~solve~, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transpor%atlon a 50' right-of-way for all of these roads. Thi~ s~otion of sexloy Cosmopolitan is recorded as follow~: 88-859 Phase VII. Plat Book 52~ Page 46, March 13, 1986. vote~ Unanimous ~4,B.2. AP~R0~IATZON GF MATOACA DISTRICT 3 CENT ROAD FUlg~S TO PEP~FOR~ NAINTENANCE ON COUNTY RIG~T-DR-WAy On motion of Mr. Sullivan~ SeConded by Mr. Mayes, the Board appropriated up tu $500 from the Matoaca District 3 Cent Road Fund to be u~ed for the removal and proper disposal ~f discarded material~ fn the Cennt~ right-0f-wa~ on a s~reet in Rabbit Run $~bdiuision. Vote: Unanimous 14oB.3. REQUESTS 'FOR BINGO/RAFFLE PERMITS On motion of Mr. Sullivan, ~econded b~ Mr. Mayes, the Board approved r~quests for ~ingo/ra~f!e ~ermit~ to the follow~ng organi~atio~ fo~ th~ calendar year 1989: Organization Type Lucy Ccrr Nursing Home Raffl~ La Sociat~ Des Forty Homes Bingo/Raffle Et Huet Chevaux voiture 1530 A1 ~artraw, Jr., Ch. 50 Disabled Bingo Clover Hill Sports_Association Raffle Optimist Club of Chesterfield Raffle American L~gion ~idlothian DO$~ Fingo 186, Inc. Thoma~ Dale Mn~ie Hoegt~r Club ~inge/Raffl~ Veterans of Foreign War~ Post 2239 Hinge/Raffle Knights of UoluR~bus, Council ~6189 Bingo/Raffle RichmOnd James River Lions Club Bingo/Ruffl~ Virginia Basa'n Gals Raffle Mid-Cities Civic Association Bingo Loyal Order of Moo~ Manchester Bingo Richmond 9669 Monacan High School Athletic Boosters Bingo Chesterfield Fraternal Order of Police Bingo/Raffle South Richmond Rotary Club Ruffle Lloyd C. Bi~d High School Hand Booster Raffle Vote: Unanimous 14.B.4. PURCHASE OF CARD-ACTIVATED COPIER ACCOUNTING DEVICES FOR CIRCUIT COURT CL~RR On motion Of ~r, ~ulliv~n, s~co~ded by Mr, Mayes, the ~ard appropriated $33,488 t~ be paid ~rom excess Court Clerk revenues, for the purchase o~ oard-uct~vated copier accounting d~vices for the Circuit Court Clerk's Office tO r~cover expenses for providing legal research documentation on property and court records. 14.B.5. APPROPRIATION OF SCHOOL BOARD QRANTS On motion of Mr. S~]livan~ seconded by Mr. Muy~, the Board increased the Special Projects Pund budget by $43,68? for receipts and expenditures which will cover a Capital Area Training Consortium grant provided from Rederal Funds through the Job Training Partnership Act, which program will be operated for l0 participants completing the curriculum and will be in effect from August 19, 1988 through June 30, 1989; and by $104,107 for receipts and expenditure~ which will cover a Substance Intervention Program ~rant from t~e Dru~ Free Schools and Comr~unities Act, which program provides funds for a Substance i~tcrventicn program for students,, in-service training for support personnel, and parent information and education session and will be in effect from Auqu~t 5, 1988 through ~ne 38, 1989. Vote: Unanimous I4.C. APPOINTMENTS i~.C.i. JOMN TYLER CO,UNITY COLLE~B LOCAL BOARD On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. ~ayes, the Board nominated for reappointed Mr. Jao~ Howe, representing Chesterfield County, te serve on the John Tyler Community Colleg~ Local ~oard, ~hose formal appointment will be made on November 23, I9S8. 14.C.2. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE On motion of ~r. Currin, secundod by ~r. Daniel, the Board nominated Ms. Donna Schneider, to complete the unexpired term of M~. Roberts Reid, eo serve on =he Che~terfleld County Historic Preservation C~itte~, whose formal appointment will Vote: Unanimous 14.D. CObLMUNiTY DEVELOPS~NT'IT~MS 14.D.1. AM~D~T ~0 RICHMOND NETROPOLITAN AUTHORITY ~ARX~NG STRUCTU~ REPOLUTION On motion ef Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board ~etropolitan Authority to Undertake Parking Facilities, as foltow~: FROM: "WHEREAS, the ~ichmond ~tropolltan Authority (RNL~) is qualified to undertake feasibility studies concerning parking rsq~ir~ment~ in the downtown area of Richmon~ and tQ acquire, sonstruct, operate and maintain such additional public parking ~acilitiss including public parking structure~ as are and will 88-861 be needed to satisfy the d~mand for additional parking in the downtown area; and WHEi~EA$, P~dA is authorized, with the approval of ~he COuncil of the City of Ri=hmond and the ~oards of Supervisors of the Counties of ~enrico and Ch~ste~fiold~ to {i! construct, acquire, operate and maintain any properties and faoili%ies, including such offise~ and commercial facilities in connection therewith as are deemed necegsary or convenient by the ~i for the relief of treftic congestion, o~ to provide vehicular parking, or to promote transportation of persons and property, or to promote the flew Of commerce that the Council of the City of Richmond and the ~oards of Supsrvisors o~ the Counties of Chesterfield and ~enrico may r~quest %he RMA to provide; and (ii) to do all other acts and things necessary or convenient to c~rry out the foregoing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chesterfield County Board Of Supervisors chat ~ is hereby requested t0 undertake the acquisition, cOkstructio~, operation and maintenance of such public Darking facilities within the downtown area o~ the City of Richmond a~ may from t~e %O time b~ ~pproved by t~e Council o~ the City of Richmond and the Boards of supervisors of the Co~ntie$ Qf Chesterfield and ~enrico, provided that the m~inten~nce is derived from parking fs~s. Vote: Unanimous" TO: "WaR.AS, under the provisions of Section 33-~55.44:13 of the Cod~ of Virginia, as ~ended, ~e Richmond Metropolitan Authority ("~") is authorized (i} with the approval of tke B0ardo ~f Supervisors of the County of Henrico and the County construct, acquire, operate and maintain any properties and connection therewith as are deemed necessary or convenient by th~ ~, for the relief of traffic congestion, or to provide vehicular parking, or %o promc%~ transportation of persons and property, or to promote the flow of c~e~ce that th~ Board~ of Chesterfield and the Council of the City of Richmond may re.est the ~ to provide; and (ii) to do all other acts and thing~ necem~ary or convenient ~o carry out the foregoing. NOW~ THB~F0~, B~ IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervi~or~ of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, do~s hereby request, authorize and approve of (i} %he atquisitiont cons~ruc%ion, operation and maintenance by ~ of a 9ublio parking facility which is to be locate~ in the downtown area of eh~ City of Riohmon~ ~oun~e~ generally ~y 9th, loth an~ Canal S~reets and a vertical plane extending from the center of the cereain portions of the Downtown Expressway right-of-way and which i~ to contain the ma~im~ feasibl~ nu~er of parking spaces based upon the ~'~ f~a~ibility ntudies an~ taking into account relevant financial, legal, engineering and tra~f~o analyses~ ~he ~ntering into by ~ of ouch financinq arrangement~ and the perfo~ance by ~ of such o~er ac~s as financial responsibility with respect Lo %he foregoing project. Vote: ~nanimous 14oD.2. CARYTOWN PAPd{INQ RESOLUTION On motion of Mr. Daniel~ seconded by Mr. Mayer, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, under the provisions cf Section 33-255.44:13 cf the Cede of Virginia, am amended, th~ Richmond Mmtropolitan Authority ("RNA") is authorized (i) with tlla approval of the Boards of supervisor~ of the County o~ Henrico and the County of Chesterfield and the Council of the City of Richmond to construct, acquire, Operate and maintain any properties and facilities, includinq such 0ffiues and commercial facilities in connection therewith a~ mr~ deemed necessary or convenient ~y the ~, 9or the relief of traffic congestion, or to vehicular parking~ or tQ promote transportation of parsons and property, or to pro~ot~ the flow of co, eros that thu Boards Supervisors of the County of Eenxi=o and the County Chesterfield and the Council of the City of Pit,end may r~que~% the ~ %O provide; and (ii) to d0 all o=~er ac~s and things necessary or convenient to carry out the foregoing. NOW, THE~FOEE~ BE IT RESOLVED, ~at the Board Supervisors of th~ County O~ Chesterfield, Virginia, hereby request, authorime and approve of (i) th~ acquisition, public pa~king facili~ies which may be l~asmd eo the City Richmond and which arm to be %ousted in th~ Cary~own shopping district of the City of Richmond at various locations within ~he c~nt~r block area bounded by We~t Cary Street, Colonial Avenue, Ellwood AV~% and Thompson Street, the eDtering into by ~ of such financing and l~a~in~ arrangements and the or approDriate in connection therewith; provided however, that Ch~te~fleld County will have no financial x~ponsibility with r=~pec~ to the foregoing project. Vote: Unanimous 14.E. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ITEMS 14.E.1. PUBLIC B~ARING~ 14.~.t.a. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE A P0RT~0~ Mr. sale stated this data and time had be~n a~V~rtised for a public hearing to consider an ordln~m=¢ to vacate a portion of Chars Drive in Glen Tara Subdivision~ Section 4-D. On motion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board adopted the following ordinan¢e: AN O~/~INANC~ to vacate a portion of Chars Road~ District, Chesterfield, Virginia, as shown on a plat thereof duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chseterfi~ld County in Plat Book 46, rage 37. WHEREAS, Raids Points Associates, InC. petitioned the Board ol Supervisors o~ Chesterfield County, Virginia to Vacate a portion of Charm Road, in Glen Tara S~bdivision, Section 4~D, Matoaea District, chesterfield County, Virginia more particularly shown on a plat of reeor~ i~ the Clerk's office o~ the circuit court of said County in Plat Book 46, Page 37, made by J. K. Tim~ons & A~ociat~$, The., dated June 25~ 1984. The portion of the road petitioned to be vacated is ~ore fhlly demcribed am follows: A portion of Ohara Road, adjacent to Lota 1, and 51, Block 5, in ~lon Tara Subdivision., Section 4-D, the location of which is more fully shown, on a plat made by J. K. Timmona & Aasoclate~, P.C., dated Oc%obe~ 27~ 1988~ a copy of which is a~tached hereto and made a part of this ordinance. WHerEAS, notice has been given pursuant to section 15.t-431 of the Cods of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertising; and WI-IEREAS, no public nace~mity e~iste for the continuance of the portion of the road sought to be ~acated. NON TMBR~FORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY T~E BOARD OF SUPERUISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY~ VIRGINIA: That phr~uant '~o Sec%ion 15.1~482(b) of th~ Coda Virginia, 19~0, as amended, the aforesaid portion of the road 6'~-'A~'is hereby vacated. The qrantees hereby convey unto the County and the Count~ variable width utility easement az ~hown on the attached plat. Thin Ordinance ~hall be in f~ll force and effect in accordance with Section 15,l-4~2~b) of the Code of 1950, as amended, and a certified copy of this OrdinanCe; together with the plat attach~ herein shall be recorded nc ~ooner than thirty days hereafter in the Cl~rk's O~fice of the circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia pursuant to Section 15.1-485 of the Cods of vir~inla, 1950, as a~ended. The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section t5.1-483 is tO destroy the force an~ effect of the recording of the portion of the plat vacated. Thin Ordinance shall vest fee simple title to the cen~erline of the portion of the road hereby vacated in the owners of the ab~ttlng lot~ within the Glen Ta~a Subdivision~ Section 4-D free and clear of any rights of public use except as hereinabove outlined. Accordingly, ~hi$ 0mdinanee shall be indexed ix the name~ of the County o~ Chest%rfield, a~ grantor, and Charl~9 W. Wilkareon, sharon L. Wi~kexacn, and Cabaniss Construction Compamy, Or their Sueee~ofe in title, a~ Vote: Unanimous 14.E.l.b. TQ CONSIDER AN ORDINA/~CE TO VACAT~ A POKTION OF A VARIABL~ WIDTH SANITARY S~ER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT Mr. Sale stated this data and time had been advertised ~or a public h~a~ing to eon~id~r an ordinance to vacate a portion of a variable width sanitary sewer and drainage ea~ment in Scot~inghamSubdivision. NC one came forward to speak in favor cf or against the matter. On motiun of Er. kpple~ate, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Boar~ adopte~ the followinq ordinance: AN ORDINANCE to vacate a portion of a variable width sanitary newer and drainage easement across Lot 20, Block L, Scottingham Subdivision~ See%ion H, Clover ~ill District, Chesterfisld County, Virginia, a~ ~hown on a plat thereof duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the circuit Court of Chesterfield County in Pla~ ~ook 26, ?ages 78 and 7g. 88-864 WHE~AS, John and Jea$ica Heis±ng have petitioned the Board cf Supervisor8 of CheSterfield Count~, Uirg±nla to vacate a portion of a variable width sanitary sewer and drainage easement across Lot 20, Block L, Scottingham ~ubdivlsion, Section H, Clover Hill District, Chesterfield. County, Virginia more particularly shown on a plat of record in %he Clerk's Office of the Circuit Conz% of said County in Plat Book Pages 78 and 79, made by William J. Schmidt, dated July 1976. Thc portion of the easement petitioned to bo vacated are more fully described as follows: A portion of a variable width sanitary sower and drainage easement across Lot 20, Block L, ~cottingham Subdivision! Section a, the location of which is more fully shown on a plat made by Balzer and ~scooiates, Inc., datpd April 19, 1988, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a pa~t of this Ordinance. WHEREAS, notice has b~en give~ pursuant to Section 1~.1-431 of tho Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertising; and WBEREA~, ne public ~eoesaity exists for the continuance of tho portio~ of the aaeement SOught to be vacated. NOW THEREFOPcE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF ~UP~RVT$0RS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA: That pursuant to Section I5.1-482(b} of the Code cf Virginia, 1950, as ~ended, the afor,sald portion of the easement b~ and ia here~y vacated. This Ordinance shall be in ~1! force and effect in accordance with Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, aa ~]ended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the plat attached hereto shall be re¢ox~sd sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of tho Circuit Court of Chesterfield, Virginia pursuant to Suction 1~,1~485 of %he ~.o~eof Virginia, 1950, as amended. Thc a£fe== of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483 is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of the pox=ion cf the plat vacated. This OrdinanCe shall yes% fee simple title of the portion of ~he easement hereby vacated in tho pr0Dorty owners of lot 20~ free =nd clear of any rights of public use. Accordingly, this 0r~inance shall b~ indexed in the names of the Count~ of Oheeterfield as grantor and John J. Heisin~ and Jamaica M."Heising or their successors in title, as qrantee. Veto: Unanimous CONSIDERATION OF /~,.,.~UEST TO AMEND BOARD'S POLICY Aft=x a brief discussion, Mr. Currin made ~ motion to app=ovs and sewer connection fees. There was no ~econd. ~r. Applegate stated ~ho motion faile~ ~or lack of a second. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mn, Daniel, denied the request to amend the Board's policy paymsnt of water and sewer connection f~e~. the Board regarding Ayes~ Mr. ADplagate, Mr. Sulliv~n~ Mr. Daniel'and ~r. Mayas. Nays: Mr. Currin. 88-865 I4.E.3. APPROVAL OF E~GINEERS FOR THREE WASTEWATER PROJECTS IN TEE ~PROVED ~TILIT~S D~PARTN~NT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGPJ%M On m~tion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board approved and authorized the Coun:y Administra:or to execute any necessary documents entering into engineering contracts with the following three engineering firms for wastewatar projects subject to said contracts being approved by the County Attorney: J. K. Tim~ons and Asseciates~ James River Trunk Systemj S88~I32C; Midlothian'District; Austin Brockenbrough and A~sociate~ Middl~ Swift Creek Trunk System, SSH-130C, Matoaca District; and R. Stuart Royer and A$$ociates~ Bailey's Bridge Force Main~ Phase III, S~$-13~C, Matoaca/Dale Districts. (It is noted funding for these projects was included in the 1988-89 Capital Improvement Projects.) 14.E.4. AUTHORIZATION OF TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO DESIGN AND CONHTRUCT WATER PUMPING STATION ON WiNTERPOCK ROAD AND ACQUIRE RIGHT-OF-WAY On marion of Mr. Mayer, ~econded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board transferred fund~ in the amount ~f $~00,000 fro~ Courthouse Road Low Pressure Linc ~5E-5835-7A2E] to thc Physic Hill Water water pump~nq station on Winterpoek' Road and acquire a water line a~ong Winterpcck Road to ~hysic ~ill Subdivision, which funding was approved in the 1987-88 Capital Improvementm Projects. Vote: Unanimous 14.E.5. RIGET-OF-WAY ITEMS. 16.Z.5.a. CONSIDER COMD~M~ATTO~ FOR A P~PJ4IT TO CROSS SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY WITH A WAT~RLIN~ ALONG OTTEHDALR On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board Ad~nlnistrators, ~o enter into a license agreement, in £or~ waterline along property owned by Southern Railwa~ Company ~long 0tterdal~ Road near 0tterd~l~ 8ubdivi~i0mr and further, the BOard authorized, b~sed on health and ~afety need~ of the residents cf 0tterdale Subdivision, the County Attorney to successfully reached wiLh southern Railway company. 14.E.5.b. CONSIDERATION OF A SETTLEMENT FOR CONDEMNATION FOR A WAT=R TANK ON NOECLIFP ROAD on me,ion o~ ~r. Currin, sec0n~ed by Mr. S~llivan~ the ~card approve~ a settlement in th~ amount of $5,000 f~>r the purcha~ of property located at the end of NOrcliff Ro&d~ comp0~ed o9 tank and a~thori~ed tho County Administrator to sign the necessary deed. CA co.py of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) 14.E.6. CONSENT ITEMS 14.~.6.b. APPROVAL OF SEWER CONTRACT FOR BIPJfDALE~ ON SITE TRU~K SEWER Mr. Applegate disclosed to the Board thst he is part owner of a parcel to the south of tho ~ubject site which could possibly benefit from this project, declared a potentlal conflict of interest pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Tnterest Act and excused himself from th~ meeting. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Ceftin, the Board ap~rove~ an~ authorize~ the County Administrator to execut~ any necessary documents for the followlng sewer contract: E~-240CD, Bizkdale - On-Site Trunk Sewer Developer: Sprin~ Run A~osiates Contractor: G. L. Howard, Ins. Total Contract Cost: $193,696.08 Total Estimated County Cost: $ ~4,715.68 (Refund through connection fee~] Estimated Developer Cost: $16~,9~0.32 Code~ 5N-~511-997 Ay~: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currin, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mayes. Absent: Mr. Appleqate. Mr. Applegate ~etUrned to th~ meeting. APPROVAL 0~ WATER CONTRACT FOR BRANDY OAKE, SECTION 1, OU~RSIZTNG A57D OFP-SIT~ WATER ~ ~XTE~$IQ~ On motion of Mr. Su!llvan~ seconded by ~r. Currin, the ~oard approved ~n~ au=he,izod the County A~h-~inistrator to execute any necessary documents for ~he following water contract= Brandy Oaks - Section 1, Ovursizing and Off-Site Water Line E~tension Developer: Continental Land S~le~, Inc. COntraCtor: ~. Hamner Gay and Company, Inc. Total ContrsGt COSt: Total Emtimated Count~ Cost: (Befund through conneotio~ fs~) Estimated Develepe~ Cost~ Code: ~1~3,216.06 $ 99,209.44 66 and Fu=ure 5B-251t-997 14.~.~.c. AW~D CONTRACT FO~ OTTERDALE ROAD A~D B~CKENHAM SUBDIVISION WATER LINE On motion cf Mr. Sullivan, ascended by Mr. Ceftin, th~ Board awarded Contract Number W~7-174C ~or the construction of a water lin~ along Otterdale Road and 8" an~ 6" water lines in Beckenham Subdivision to Roanoke Con~truetion Company in the amount Of ~312,137.90 to provide service to the residents in Beckenham subdivision and authorized the County Administrator to execute any necessary document~. 88-867 14,E.6,d. A~ARD CONTI~ACT FOR ~A$ON AVENUE AND PETERSBURG STR~BT SEWER EXTENSIONS On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board awarded Contras% Number M$8-~25C for the construction sanitary sewer extension linus along Mason Avenue and Vote: Unanimeus 14.E.6.e. APPROVAL OF VACATION AND Pd~DEDiCATION OF SEWER ACROSS PROPERTY OF MR. AI~D MRS, WILLIAM H, 0RIN0 On motion of Mr. Sullivan, ~econd~d by Mr, Coffin, th~ Board approved and autherized the Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator to execute a~ agreement for th~ vacation and re-dedication of a sewer easement across the property cf Mr, William ~. and M~. Jane Orino. ~A copy of the plat i~ filed with the papers of this Boar~.) 14.E.6.f. APPROVAL OF QUITCLAIM DEED FOR PORTIONS OF 16 FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT IN TEE VICINITY OF HULL STREET ROAD On motion of Mr. sullivan, seconded by ~r. Currin, the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator to execute a Quitclaim Deed to vacate Rortlons of the 16' width drainage sasement in the vicinity of Bull Street Road and Genito Road. (A copy Of th~ Dlat iS filed with the pap~ of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous 14.E~.g. CMANGE ORDER NUMBER 1 FOR CONTRACT WB7-98E: HUNTERS RIDGE/G~NITO ROAD A~A WATRR LIN~ ~ROJ~CT On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute Chang~ Ordur ~%unbur 1 for Con=ran= Number W$7-98E, Runters Ridqe/Qeuito Road .Area Wate~ Line Prejeet~ te T & E Constructic~ Company, In~., a~ an eztimated cost of $42,206.00, to change the scope of the ~aterline project to include tho installation of water services and boxes. (I% ia noted sufficient funds are appropriated to perform this additional work.) Vote: Unanimous 14.E.7. REPORTS Mr. Sal~ presented the ~oar~ with a report on the developer water and sewer contracts executed by the County Administrator. 14.F. P~PORTS Mr. Ramsay presented the Board wi=h a status report on the General Fund Contingency Account~ General Fund Balanee~ Read Ksserve Fund, Dis%rio= aea~ and street Light ~und and Lease Purchaseu. Mr, Ramsay sta~ed ~he virqinia Department of Transportation ha~ formally notified the C~unty of the acceptance of the ~ollowln~ roads into the State Secondary System: ADDITIONS LENGTN MONACAN WILLS - SRCT%0~ 3 Route 3781 {South Wsdgemont Drive) - From 0.03 mile West of Route 3780 to Rout~ 4071 0.~4 Mi. Route 3781 {North W~dqemont Drive) - From 0.02 mile North chi-de-aec 0.0~ Mi. Route 4071 (Coralb~rry Drivs) - Fro~ Route 3781 to 0.03 mile N~rth of acute 4073 0.19 Mi. Route 4072 (Woodmill Place) - From acute 4~71 to a Wes% cul-de-sac 0.0~ Mi. Route 4073 (Crestmoor Court) - From Rouh~ 4071 $0 a West cul-&e-sac 0.06 Mi. RECONFIRM RESOLUTIONS AND gPBCIAL On motion of Mr. Daniel, reaffirmed adoption of Cnrrin was absent: s~conded by Mr. Sullivan, =he ~oard the following resolution~ ~ine~ Mr. 10.N. NR. D~MU$ M. OXFORD UPON ATTAINING RANK 0E EAGLE SCOUT "On motion cf Mr. Daniel, $~conded by Mr. Sullivan, the following resolution wa~ adopted: WHEPd3AS, The Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. W~RR~A~ The ~oy Scouts of ~Unerica was founded to promote citizenship training~ personal development and ~itness. of individuals; and WHRk~AS, After earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service pro, eot beneficial to his community, being active in the troop, demonstrating spirit and living up to the Scout Oath hud Law; and WHEI%~AS, Mr. Damns ~. Oxford~ Branch's Baptist Church, Troop 801, has accomplished ~Q~e high standards of occident and ha~ reache~ ~he lon~-so~ght ~oal of Eagle Scout which received by le~$ than tWO percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WH~AS, Growing through his experiences in Scoutinq, learning the l~ssons of respon~ibl~ clti~enship and priding himsel~ on the qr~at accomplishment~ of his County, Demus indeed a m~er of a new ~neration of prepared young citizeng of whom we can all be very proud. NOW~ T~E~F0~ BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield to M~. Demu~ M. Oxford and acknowledges %he good fortune Of County to have SUCh an o~tscan~ing young man as one of its citizens." 88-869 10.C. PROCLAIMING NOVESLBRR 14-20, I985 AS C~ESTERFiELD COU~TY YOUT~ WEEK "On motion of Mr. Daniel~ seconded by Mr. Mayas, the following resolution was adopted; W~=KEAM, The Board of Supervisors aokn0wledges the importance of positive and healthy youth develo~ent in Chesterfield County; and WRaP, AS, The Board of Supervisors created a Youth Services Cofm~isSiOn to advocate for youth by crusting conditions in our community to promote the well-being of young people; and WHEREAS, The Youth Services Commission draws on the exemplary talents, cormmitment and dedication of youth and community members to organize programs addressing the needs o£ our young people; and WHEREAS, The Board of Supervisors recognizes the efforts o~ the Youth Services Commission and Optimist Club of James River to stimulate constructive activities for youth~ and ~5{EREAS, The youth of Ches~erfiel~ County devote exceptional time, energy and spirit to their community ~hrough volunteer work, extracurfioular activitie~ and individual acte~ and WHEREAS, 'The Chesterfield con. unity ha~ an obligation to be aware of the.aacomplishments and needs of their youth. Now, THEREFOt~E BE IT RE~OLVED, that 'th~ chesterfield County Bourd of Supervisors declares ~ovsmber 14 - 2~, 1988 as "Chesterfield County Youth week" whereupon activities recognizing the contribution ~f County ~cuth and focusing public attention upon issues affecting younq people will be ~eld. AND~ BE IT FURTEER R~SOLVED, that November 1~, 198S wilI be. Youth Awards Night to 'honor youth for their courage, compassion and e~rvt~e by recognizi~g them wi~h the "Outstanding Youth of Chesterfield County" award given by the Optimist Club of James River.'~ 10.D. MRS. PATRICIA TOMASIK, MR. STONER TP~CEY AND MRS. CAROLYN BALDWIN, EDUCATORS AT MIDLOTHIAN HIGN SCHOOL "On morion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Applegate, %he following resolution was adopted: providing a nurtnring~ learning environment in which our young people may develop into skil!e~ pro~uetlve adults: and WS~AS, Educators are faced with the difficult challenges of increased classroom ~izes, the demand for more resources and responding ~f~eetively to parents and the community; end WHEREAS, In light of these challenges, Chesterfield County S~hool~ r~fl~t~ a ~y~m of educators who OarrF th~ vision and dedication to meet the overall individual and educational needs of the children; and WHEREAS, Chester~ield County educators are well aware of and prepared to handle within the School environment the i~pact$ of today'~ social and emotional stresses on our children; and WHEREAS, On October 28~ 19S8~ ~taff from Midlcthian Hiqh School encountered an unexpected situation which had the 88-870 W~E~A$, Mrs. ~atrici~ Tomiasik immediately responded %o preventing harm tQ the student and others~ and WHEREAS, Upon the arrival of Mr. Stoner Tracey, and with student into relinquishing the firearm~ and WEEREAg, The immediate safety needs fo~ all students and provide the caring and support demonstrated by her colleagues County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes Mrs. Patricia selfless, perceptive and protective actions which ensured the safety and well being of all students and faculty in Midlothlan demonstrate a dedication to providing the optimum environment £o~ learning and a eOmpa~ion fo~ the physloal an~ emotional well beinq of all younq people." ~r. Applegate stated, with the defeat of the Food and Beverage proposal, he would like staff to evaluate the amount of debt which can be issued ove~ the next five (5) years. There was considerable diso~ssio~ a~ to amounts, etc. It was generally agreed staff should review the following issues with the County's bond consultant and with other sources necessary to make an accurate estimate of the debt capacity: - A 10 cent real estate ~ax increase in 19S9. - A continuing proportion of g~nsr~l fund revenues ars available for debt. - Maintain the County bond rating. - 1/3 of the School referendum items to be funded by a foo~ beverage tax. Staff should review these issues with the County's bond consultant and with other sources necessary to make an accurate 0~ motion of M~. Sullivan, s~conded by'Mr. Currin, the Board adjourned at 11~50 p.m, until 9:00 a.m. on November 23, 1988. County Administrator 88-871