01-27-1988 MinutesBOA~D OF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
January 27, 1988
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr. G. ~. Applegate, Chairman
Mr. M. B. Sullivan, Vice Chairman
Mr. C. F. Currin, Jr.
Mr. Harry G. Daniel
Mr. Jesse J. Mayes
Mr. Lane B. Rameey
County Administrator
Staff in Attendance:
Ms. Joan Dolezal,
Clerk to the Board
Mr. ~radford S. Ha~uer,
Deputy Cc. Admin.,
Management Services
Mr. William H. Howell,
Dir., Gen. Services
Mr. Thomas E. Jacobsen,
Dir. of Planning
Mr, Robert Masden,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Human Services
Mr, R. J, MeCracken,
Transp. Director
Mr. Richard McElfish,
Dir, of Env. Eng.
Mr. Steve Micas, Co.
Attorney
Mrs. Pauline Mitchell,
Dir. of News~Info.
Service~
Mr. Richard Sale,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Development
Mr. Jay Stegmaier,
Dir. of Budget
Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr.,
Dir. of Parks & Rec.
Mr. David Welchons,
Dir. of Utilities
Mr. Frederick Willis,
Dir. of Human
Resource Management
Mr. Applegate called the meeting to order at 9~00 a.m. (EST).
1. INVOCATION
~r. Applegate introduced Reverend Jerome ~aneock, Pastor of
the Seuthside Church of the Nazarene, who gave the invocation.
2. PL~DGF OF ~GIANC~ TO T~ F~AG OF Tm~ ~NITED STATES OF
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United Sta~es of
America was recited.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
approved the minutes of January 13, 1988, as amende~.
Vote: Unanimous
4. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S C0~/~T$
Mr. Ramsey stated there were no comments at this time.
88-28
§. BO~/~ ~4ITTEE REPORTS
Mr. Daniel sompar~d the Cou~ty'~ current ~tatus with that of
1967-68 Chesterfield Connty Annual Report; reported
Richmond Regional ~lannlng District Co~mission (/LRPDC~ is
bidding for the National Association of Regional Councils'
convsntio~ to be held in Richmond in t991; the RftPDC has 9as~ed
a resolution ~dentifying the ne~d for a regional wa~t~ disposal
system for the entire Ric~ond ~etro~olitan area and is a~king
the state for full participation in thi~ end,aver ~o
mechanisms in place may bu used to begin work on this vital
ies~e~ and announced the Virginia A~socia~ion of Counties
(VACO) meeting will b~ held January 2S, 1988.
consideration of his resolution regarding ~ need for a
to safely dlspos~ of solid/hazardous was%~ in the County, State
a~ Nation.
Mr. Sullivan reported ke attended the Lak~ G~ni%o ~eeting
at which it was decided to forego any legislative aceivity for
the current
Mr. Currin ~tated he would be ae%~n~iDg ~e J~es River
Certified Development Corporation meeting in the n~a~ f~tur~.
Mr. Applegate reported on the annual increa~ in traffic at
Ric~ond Int~rnaelonal Airport and the terminal expansion which
is approximately 99%
~:. Applegate ~tated he attended the Virginia Municipal League
legislative co~ittee meeting a~ which he voiced ~e County'~
position regarding the recent Join~ Legislativ~ Audit
Review Co~ission'~ (JLARC) Study as i% related to
changes in the funding fox,la fo~ basic aid funding ~o local
to prepare a resolntion re~estinq the County's Leglsla%ive
Delegation work ~O pre~erv~ the exizttng school f~nding formula
and ensure that changes will not penalize localities by
reducing fun~in9 below the level prcvi~e~ ~y the current
formula and requesting an opportunity to me~t with the
the County,
~. REQUESTS TO ~0ST~ONEACTION{ ~.~G~CYADDITIONS OR
added Item ll.M., Resolution Regue~ting Consideration of Fund~
the Existing Fun~in9 Fozmul~ for Ba~i~ Aid ~und~ng tO Local
7. ~SOL~TION$ ~D $~ECIP. L RECOGNITIONS
7.A. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY EMPLO~E-OF-THE-YEAR FOR 1987
Mr. Willis introduced the 1987 nominees for the Chesterfield
County Employee-ef-ths-Year, who were as follows:
Me. Diana Allin M~/MR
Mr. Herbert W. Evans, Jr. Utilities
Ms. Shirley Layne
Me. Leis C. Lynch
Ms. Catherine Hall Purdue
Ms. Pearlle M. Perkins
Ms. Frances Reese
Investigator William F. Showalter
Ms. Janet M. Tiernan
Ms. ~ary White
Information Systems
Technology
Treasurer
Parks and Recreation
General Services
Accounting
Police
Library
Nursing Rome
Mr. R~msey congratulated all those nominated and announced that
Mr. Herbert W. Evans, Jr. was selected as the 1987
Employee-of-the-Year. Mr. Applegate congratulated Mr. Evans
and presented him with a framed resolution, a silver engraved
Revere Bowl, a $50 savings bond and the reserved parkinq space
at the entrance of the Administration Building.
On motion of th~ Board, the following resolution was adoptsd:
WHEREAS, Herbert W. Evans, Jr. has been nominated by the
Department of Utilities as a person possessing those qualities
of superior performance and dedication to excellence in public
service required of a recipient of this coveted award; and
WHEP~EAS, During twenty-one years of service which began in
1967 as an operator trainee at the Falling Creek Water Plant
until his present position as Water Plant Superintendent, his
enthusiasm, knowledge and commitment to ensuring the highest
quality water resources for the citizens of the County has
gainsd widespread respect from his employees, supervisors and
citizens alike; and
WHEREAS, Under his leadership he established the County's
bacteriological laboratory which when inspected for State
certification received the first and only perfect rating ever
awarded in the Commonwealth of Virginia, bringing recognition
to Chesterfield County as a leader in this field; and
WHEREA$, Mis abilities have been recognized by his peers
in his selection as the Chairman of the State chapter of the
American Water Works Association and he is sought out by State
Health Department officials as a respected industry instructor
in classes and workshops on water quality and water plant
operations.
NOW, THEREFOR~, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors hereby recognizes the loyalty, superior performance
and dedication of
HERBERT W, EVANS, JR.
by naming him as the Chesterfield County Employee of the Year
for 1987.
Vote: Unanimous
7.B. DECLARING FEBRUARY "HEART MONTH"
On motion of the Board, the following re~olution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Cardiovascular disease continues to be Virginia's
number one cause of death and remains on~ of our State's major
health problems; and
WHEREAS, Heart attacks, strokes, high blood pressure and
other life threatening diseases affect more than one million
Virginians; and
WHEREAS, The Richmond Metropolitan Council of the American
Heart Association continues to lead the fight against this
tragic toll with progra/~s aimed at teaching each of us how we
88-30
WI~EREAS, Twelv% thousand volunteer~ in ~he ~e=ro area join
together in thi~ vital undertaking every year to improve our
odds of dyiuq from this dreaded disease, which is currently
"Heart Month" in Chesterfield County, calling attention %o th~
problem of heart disease and the American Heart Association's
the work of this worthwhile organization.
Richmond Marriott.
7.C. SIGNET BANK/VIRGINIA FOR CONTRIBUTION TO 1987
CHRIST~S
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHerEAS, The Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation
D~partmenf functions tc positively effect the quality of life
in Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Th~ ~rovlsion o~ high quality ~p~oial evunts
represents an important means oi achieving this f~otlon; and
WHEREAS, Th~ 1987 Legendary Christmas represented an
enjoyable !amily-oriented celebration of the holiday season, as
well as a tribnt~ to Chesterfield County'~ colorf~l past; and
W~EPJ~AS, The event attracted the hlg~est participation in
its history; and
WHEREAS, Signet Bank/Virginia chose to provide significant
support for thin co~unity-wi~e event.
~OW, TRRR~FORE BE IT ~d~SOLV~D, that the Chesterfield
Oounty Board of Supervisors does hereby recoqnize
Dank/Virginia for its generous contribution to the event and to
the citizens of Chesterfield County.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chesterflel~ County
Board of Supervisors doss hereby express it~ sincer~
appreciation and grabitud~ to Signet Ba~k/Virglnia for
Mr. stith presented the e~ecuted resolution %o Ms. Brenda
Lloyd, Assistant Vice President of Signet Bank/virginia, and
introduce~ ~s. Catherin~ ~all Purdue, CO--ending her diligent
efforts in raising funds for th~ ~nt. Ms. Lloyd
appreciation fo~ th~ opportunity ho have ~ponsored/particlpated
in the event and pre~ent~d the Board with a $7OO check.
8. S~%RINGS OF CI?Ig,~N$ ON UNSCHEDUI~D ~ATTERS OR CLAIMS
There were no hearinq~ of ~itizens cn unscheduled matter~ Or
claims.
9. DEFERRED ITEMS
o STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION COST APPROVALS
Mr. Daniel made a motion, seconded by Mr. Mayes, to approve
street light installation costs for the followinq locations,
with funds to be expended from the appropriate account as
indicated:
1. Intersection of Drakeshire Reed and Grassmere Road
($1,001.00) Dale District Street Light Fund;
2. Intersection of Monza Drive and Tyme Road ($931.00) Dale
District Three Cent Road Fund;
And further, deferred expenditure of funds from the Dale
District Street Light Fund for the following locations until
July 1, 1988:
1. Intersection of Bonnie Brae Drive and Tymc Road ($931.00);
and
2. Intersection of Fulstonc Road and Grassmere Road ($989.00)
A~ter a brief discussion, Hr. Daniel amended his motion,
seconded by Mr. Mayes, to approve street light installation
costs for the following locations in the Dale Magisterial
District, with funds to be expended from tho appropriate
account as indioated and with the understanding that said funds
expended from the Clover Hill District Street Light Fund will
be reimbursed by the Dale District Street Light Fund effective
July 1, 1988:
1. Intersection of Drakeshire Road and Grassmere Road
($1,001.00) Dale District Street Light Fund~
2. Intersection of Monza Drive and Tyme Road ($931.00} Dale
District Three Cent Road Fund;
3. Intersection of Bonnie Brae Drive and Tyme Road ($931.00)
Clover 5ill District Street Light Fund; and
4. ~ntersection of Falstone Road and Grassmere Road ($989.00)
Clover Hill District Street Light Fund.
10. PUBLIC ~EARINGS
10.A. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO ARE~D TBS COUNTY CODE RELAT-
ING TO EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL-INSPECTIONS~ NOTICE
OF DEFICIENCIES
Hr. Micas stated this date and t~rae had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance amendment relating to
erosion and sediment control.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the
proposal.
On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
CHAPTER 7.2, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL, ~¥
AMENDING SECTION 7.2-14, INSPECTIONS, NOTICE OF
DEFICIENCIES
BE IT ORDAI~D by the Eoard of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
88-32
(1) That Chapter 7.2 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, Virginia is amended and ~'eenacted by amending the
following section:
~e¢. 7.3-14. Inspections; notlue of deficiencies.
(a) Every oerti£1catiQn shall expressly re,eryc a right
of entry sufficient t0 permit the environmental engineer or his
designated agent to enter upon property at all reasonable times
fc~ the purpose of making inspections to determine whether the
requirements of this chapter or the applicable approved erosion
and sediment control plan are being complied with. Such
resident owner~ occupier or operator shall be give~ an
opportunity to accompany th~ inspectors.
(b) If it is determined that there is a failure to comply
with an approved planj the environmental engineer shall serve
notice to comply upon thc person who is responsible for
carrying out the plan by either 1) delivery of the notice by
hand, or ~1 delivery by registered or certified mail, at the
address specified by him in %he ¢OV~r letter of his erosion and
sediment control plan er by delivsry at the ~te of the
permitted activities to the agunt, contractor or employee of
the permi~ supervising such ac~ivlties, such notice shall
set forth the section of this chapt%r uiolate~ and th~
~eede~ ~or compliance. Such no,ice shal~ further specffy the
time within which such measures shall b~ aomp~e%ed. Upon
failure of the person to comply within the time ~p~cifie~
within the notice, he will be deemed in violation of this
chapter and upon conviction thereof will be subject to the
penalties of this chapter.
(c) If the measure~ needed for compliance are not
completed withi~ the time specified within the notice, the
environmental engineer ~ay tuk~ emerqency measures to install
ground cover or other temporary ~roslon and sediment control
stabili~in~ devices to th~ minimttm extent nece~ar~ to achieve
erosion and ~edlmsnt control equal to that which would hays
buen furnished by the measures ~hown Ou %he approved plans.
Thc cost of any emergency measnres taken hy the environmental
engineer shall be documented by him ~nd, after notice thereof
to the owner, shall be a eharg~ against the guarantee of
performance ~t forth in ~etion 7.2-12.
violation of this chapter from the enviro~nnental engineer,
County Administrator may, in conjunutlon with or subsequent ts
a notioe to comply as specified in subsection (h) above, issue
an order requiring that all or par~ of the land disturbing
activities pe~-mitted on the site be Stopped until the specilied
corrective measures have been taken. Where the noncompliance
is causing or i~ in ~inen% dong~r of causing harmful erosion
of land~ e~ soda,Bent deposition in water within watershed~ of
the County, such an order may be issued without regard
specified in oubsection (b). Otherwise, ~ueh an order may be
issued only el=er the psrmittee has failed to comply with such
a notice to comply. The order shall be ~r~ed in the same
manner as a ~otius to sum~ly, and shall remain in effect for a
period of suvcn duys from fhe date Of service pending
application by the environmental engineer for appropriate
relief to th~ Circuit Court of Chesterfield County. Upon
completion cf the correction action, the order shall
i~ediatety be lifted.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage.
Vote~ Unanimous
88-33
10.R. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISE THE RUFFIN MILL
ROAD AREA SPECIAL TAX OR ASSESSMENT SEWER DISTRICT
Mr. Sale $tated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing te consider an ordinance to establish the Ruffin
Mill Road area special tax or assessment sewer district.
Mr. Currin disclosed to the Board that he is affiliated with an
indivld~al who has an interest in the subject property;
however, upon advisement of the County Attorney, he did not
have a conflict of interest and could vote on the matter.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the
proposed district.
On mo%ion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. ~ayes, the Board
appropriated $1,000,000 from the sewer system net revenues to
prefinance the Ruffin Mill Road Area Special Tax or. Assessment
Sewer District, with the understanding that revenues generated
are repaid to the appropriate Utilities Fund~; and adopted the
following ordinance, effective January 28, 1988:
AN ORDINANCE TO ~STARLIS~ T~ RUPFIN MILL ROAD AREA SPECIAL
TAX OR ASSeSSMeNT ~W~R DISTRICT, TO CONSTRUCT CERTAIN
SRWER FACILITIES THEREIN, AND TO IMPOSE CERTAIN TAX~S OR
ASSESSMENTS UPON OWI~ERS OF PROPERTY LOCATED THEREIN
ENACTING ARTICLE VIII~ CHAPTER 20
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as
amended, is amended and reenacted by adding to Chapter 20 a new
article, Article VIII, as follows:
Article VIII. Ruffin Mill Road Area
Special Tax er Assessment District
Section 20-178. Definitions. In the context of this
Article, the definitions contained in this section sh~ll be
observed and applied, except when the context clearly indicates
otherwise.
District. "District" means the "Ruffin Mill Road Area
Special Tax or Assessment Sewer District."
Map of the District. "Map of the District" means the map
entitled "Ruffin ~ill Road Area Special Tax or Assessment Sewer
District," prepared by County of Chesterfield Department of
Utilities, dated January 5, 1988, revised January 19~ 1988,
which map is on file with the Director of Utilities.
Section 20-179~ Establishment of Ruifln Mill Road Area
Special Tax or Assessment Sewer District. Pursuant to
Sections 15.1-239 et seq. of the Code of Virqinia, 1950, as
amended, there is hereby created in the County the Ruffin Mill
Road Area Special Tax Or Assessment Sewer District. The area
of the District shall be and the same is hereby fixed within
the boundaries depicted on the M~p of the District.
Section 20-180. Construction of Certain Sewer Facilities
in and Adjacent to the District.
The Utilities Department shall cause to be constructed in
and adjacent to the District the sewer line and appurtenant
facilities depicted on the Map of the District.
Section 20-181. Taxes or Assessments u~on Owners of
Property Located Within the District. The cost of construction
of the s~wer line and appurtenant facilities located within the
District shall be apportioned among the owners of property
abutting the sewer line. The amount of the tax or assessment
88-34
charged to each such owner of abutting proper~y shall be in the
same proportion to 75~ of the total cost of the improvements
constructed within th~ District pursuant to Section 2O-180 as
the acreage located within the District which is owned hy the
abutting property owner bears to the total acreage in the
District. The amount ~inally taxed er assessed against ~ach
landowner shell be reported to the treasurer as soon as
practicable after completion of the sewer line and ~ppurtsnant
facilitiss loca=e~ Within the Distlict, and the treasurer shall
·nter th~ ~ame a~ p~ovided ~or other taxes.
Section 20-182. Installment ~ay3lent of assessments. Any
person against whom an assessment provided for in this Article
VIII has been finally made sh~ll pay the full amount of an
assessment provided for in this Article VIII on the due date
the first tax bill on which such assessment is shown. In no
even=, however, shall a~y part of ~he assessment bu due prior
to the completion of the sewer lin~ end appurtenant facilities
cons=ru=ted 9~rsuant to this Article VIII. As an alternative
to pa~rment as provided above, a person against whom an
assessment provided for in this Article VIII has been mad~ may
pay such assessment in twenty equal semi-annual
unpaid principal balance at the rate o~ 12 percent Dst ann%t~.
the unpaid prinulpal balance of the a~es~ment shall accrue
0~herwis~ have be~n due as provided above.
Section ~0-185. ~3lease of proper~y. Any person against
made may obtain a full release, a partial release, or partial
such assessment. The amount of acreage released ~hall bo a
percentage of the total acreage subject tO the li~n of the
release is made to the Director of U~ilities, After
apply.
Vote: Unanimous
10.C. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE RUFFIN MILL
ROAD AR~A SUbDIViSION AND DEVELO~=NT SEWER DISTRICT II
FOR A PORTION OF THE MUFFIN MILL ROAD AREA
Mr. Sale stated this date and time hud be~n advertised far a
public hearing to consider an ordinance to ~staDlish the Muffin
Mill Road area Subdivision and Development Sewer District
for a portion of the Ruffin ~ill Road Area.
No on~ tame for~ard ~o speak in favor o£ or against the
proposed ordinance.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by ~r. Mayas, th~ Beard
adopte~ tbs following ordinance, effective January 28, 1988~
AN ORDINANC~ TO ESTABLISH THE MUFFIN NILL RO~J~
A~A ~UBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT $~W~R DISTRICT II,
TO ~ESTRUCT CERTAIN SEWER FACILITIES THEREIN,
ANB TO IMPOSE CERTAIN FE~S OR TAX~$ WITH RESPECT
SUBDIVISION DR DEVELOPFiENT OF PROPERTY LOCATED
THEREIN BY ENACTING ARTICLE IX, CHAPTER 20
8~-35
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1] That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as
amended, is amended and reenacted by adding to Chapter 20 a new
article, Article IX, as follows:
Article XI. Reffin Mill Road Area
Subdivision and Development Sewer District II
Section 20-184. Definitions.
In the context of this Article, the definitions contained
in this section shall be observed and applied, except when the
context clearly indicates otherwise.
District. "District" means the "Ruffin Mill Road Area
Subdivision and Development Sewer District II."
Development. "Development" means a tract of land
developed or to be developed as a unit under single ownership
or unified control which is to be used for any business or
industrial purpose or i~ to contain three or more residential
dwelling units. The term "development" shall net be construed
to include any property which will be principally devoted to
agricultural production.
Map of the District. "Map of the District" means the map
entitled "Ruffin Mill Road Area Subdivision and Development
Sewer District II" prepared by County of Chesterfield
Department of Utilities, dated January 5, 1988, revised January
18, 1988, a copy of which is on file with the Director of
Utilities.
Sewer Facilities. "Sewer Facilities" means the sewer
facilities constructed pursuant to Section 20-187.
Subdivision. "Subdivision" shall have the meaning ascribed
to that term in Section 18-2 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1978, as amended.
Section 20-185~ Establishment of Ruffin Mill Road Area
~ubdiv~ion and Development Sewer District II.
Pursuant to Section 15.1-466(A) (j) of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, a~ amended, there is hereby created in the
County the Ruffin Mill Road Area Subdivision and Development
Sewer District II. Thc District shall be and the same is hereby
fixed within the boundaries depicted on the Map of the
District.
Section 20-186. ~stablishment of General Sewer Improvement
Program for Ruffin Mill Road Area Subdivision and Development
Sewer District
There is hereby established a general sewer improvement
program for the District, which program is described on the Map
of District, a copy of which is on file with the Utilities
Department.
Section 20-187. Construction 0£ Certain Sewer Facilities
within the District.
The Utilities Department shall cause to be constructed in
and adjacent to the District a gravity sewer line of varying
diameters and appurtenant facilities as depicted in the shaded
area of the Map of the District.
Section 20-188. Fees er Charges Upon Subdividers or Developers
~-~ P~pert~y ~-6cated Within the District.
88-36
(a) The ~ubdivider or developer of property located
within the District shall, before ar at tbs time of issuance of
a building permit for the construction of any building or
structure to be located On his p~operty which is to be the
subject of development er ~ubdivision, pay or provide for ~he
Facilities. The share of a subdivider or developer with
respect to property within the District which is to be the
subject Of development or subdivision shall be in ~he sam~
proportion to 25% of ~he total cost of the improvemsnts
c0n~trnc~ed ~ithin th~ Di~t~ict, pursuant to Section 20-187 as
the acreage located in his subdivision or development bears to
the total acreage in Area C of the District.
(b) In any case where a payment ~y the subdivider or
developer is required prior to construction of the S~Wer
Facilities pursuant to Section 20-187~ the amount paid by the
subdivider or developer shall be held in an interest bearing
account for the benefit of the subdivider or developer until
commencement of such con~eructlon.
{c) Any subdivider or developer of property located
within the District who pays ~ share cf the cost of
Facilities tc~ether with simple interest un the unpaid.
paid, which fntare~e shall ba computed at the rat~ of 12
Vote: Unanimous
10.D. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TME COUNTY CODE Pd~LAT-
DEVELOPMENT
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had be~n a~ver~ise~ for a
public hearing :o consider an ordinance to amend the County
Cod~ relating to the provision of public water and sewer to new
development.
Ms. bambl Barnett, Legislative Coordinator for the Nome
Builders' Association, stated the Association genera!ly
supported the proposed ordinance with the exception of the
required payment for watei lines; Mr. Harold ~at=hews and Mr.
Larry Madison, ~oil ~cientists, generally ~upport~d ~he
proposed ordinance but ~xpressed concsrns relative to
requirements for drilling welt~ prior to r~COrdatiun of the
subdivision, escrow fundlmg end the 1 acre tot size requirement
determination for the ~se of either public Water or wells; add
~r. Don Vance, a developer, also voiced Opposition to the
~equiTed payment for wate~ lines as he felt it would be an
unnecessary burden to the sm~li ~eveloper.
Di~eu~ion and ~uestluns ensued relative to concerns 'for the
need to inc]ud~ standards for conducting hydrological seudies,
as well as minimum spezi£iuations for the construction of
dome~tie water wells; the continued use of s~pt~c systems with
no changes to the current sewer policy ba~ed upon data
f~Om ~taff that there are very few problems with septic
systems, particularly since the County adopted new regulations
regarding installation of septic ~yst~m~: the escrow
requirement; one (1] acre lot requirement for determining the
use o~ public water or well service within the five (5~ mile
radius of ~xisting public water ~acilities; drilling well~
prior to recordation of s~bdivi~icn~ O~ issuance cf building
~ermits~ th~ effective dat~ of the ordinance7 enforcement of
~-37
the installation of dry water lines for subdivisions within the
five (5) mile radiu~ of ~xisting public facilities and
reduction of the five (5) mile requirement to two (2) miles;
compliance with the ordinance for family member transfers; etc.
Mr. Daniel stated he generally supported the proposed ordinance
with the recommended modifications but pointed' out he was
prepared to make zoning decisions based on the availability of
public sewer.
Mr. Sullivan stated he also generally supported the proposed
ordinance with the recommended modifications; however~ he would
like to see the County become more restrictive in its policies
and would encourage staff to continue working on these issues
and reexamine the sewer policy.
Mr. Currin stated'he generally supported the proposed ordinance
with the recof~mended modifications but felt additional study
would be needed in the future.
Mr. Mayes stated he generally supported the proposed ordinance
with the recommended modifications but expressed concern for
the protection of consumers.
Mr. Applegate stated he felt the current sewer policy was
adequate but expressed concerns relative to the drilling of
wells prior to issuance of building permits versus recordation;
compliance for family member transfers; reduction of the radius
requirement for payment of the estimated cost of installing
water lines when wells are used; establishment of a program to
implement and administer the specifications for domestic water
well construction.
After further discussion, it was on motion of Mr. Applegate,
seconded by Mr. Daniel, resolved to adopt the following
ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TKE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD,1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING S~CTIONS 18-28
AND 20-42 AND ADDING S=CT%O~S 20-42.1, 20-42.2
AND 20-42.3 R~LATING TO CONNECTION
TO TH~ COUNTY WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County that Section 18-28 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended by adding the
following ~ub~ections:
Sec.. 18-28. Required improvements.
o o o
(c) Connection to the County Water Supply System shall be
required in the following circumstances, after the effsctive
date of this ordinance:
1. In a proposed subdivision, when any lot in the
subdivision has an area of le~ than one acre; or
2. For any lot or parcel, created after the effective
date of this ordinance, having an area leas than one acre; or
3. When an existing water line is less than two hundred
(200) feet from any property line of the lot for which a
building permit is sought.
(d) Payment sufficient to cover the cost of water line
installation shall be made to the County prior to the issuance
of any building permits in any subdivision proposed within two
(2) miles of an existing water line, or within two (2) miles of
a subdivision which will use public water, when lots in the
88-38
proposed ~ubdivision ha~e an area greater than one (1) acre but
less than five {5) acres. The payment made under this
subsection shall be used solely for the installation of water
lines in the proposed subdivision. A lot created for the
purpose of sale or gift to a msmber of the lot owner's
immediate family shall be exempt from thmse requirements.
(e) Individual wells may be used to provide water for
domestic consumption provided
(1) No lo~ whiah is proposed to be served by a well
shall have an area of less than one acre; end
(2) In a subdivision wh~re lots are proposed to be
served by izdivldual well~, all lots shall have an area greater
than one airs; and
(3~ Where lots are proposed tO be served by
individual wells, a hydrologic study shall be conducted which
provides a scientific determination of th~ quality end quantity
of potable water in the undeztying acquifsr under both "normal~
and "drought" condition~ for the ar~a under consideration; and
{4) Prior to obtaining a building permit a
shall he installed, tested and approved on each lot or parcel.
(f) Any ~ubdivisisn granted tentative appnoval prior to
the effective date of this erdinancs shall be exsmDt from the
requirements of S~bsection 18.28 {e) , (d) and (e} (11 , [2) and
(3) unles~ ~en=a~ivs approval is not renewed and expires.
2. ~E IT ORDAINED that Chapter 20 of the Code of th= County
of Chesterfield, 1978,.a$ amended is amsnded ss
Any individual structure for which a building permit has
which is within two hundred (200; feet of a water line shall
cQnnect to the county water system.
Connection to the County Water Supply Sys=em shall be
require~ in the following circumstance~, aftsr the effective
date of ~/qis ordinance:
(a) In a proposed ~ubdivision, when any lot in the
vision has an area cf less then one acre~ or
(b) Any lot or parcel~ created after the effective date
of thi~ ordinance, having an area less than one acre; or
(c) If an existing water line is less than two hundred
{200) Zest ~rom any property lin= of the lot for which a
b~ilding permit is sough=.
sec. 20-~.1. Required ~a~i~ent for wats.r..~nes.
Payment sufficient to cover the cost cf water 1 ins
inst~llation shall be made to the County prior to the i~uanc~
of any building permit~ in any subdivision proposed within two
~2) miles of an existing water line, or ~ithin two {1) mil~s cf
a subdivision which will usa public water, when lots in the
proposed subdivision have an area greater than on~ {i) acre bud
less than five (~) acres. The Dayment mede under this sect/on
shall be used solely for thm insfallation of water 4ine~ in the
proposed subdivision. A lot created for the purpose of sale ar
qift to a membe~ of the tot owner's immedia~ family shall be
exemp~ from ~hese retirements.
8~-39
Sec. 20-42.2. Private wells allowed.
Individual wells may be used to provide water for domestic
consumption provided that:
(a) No lot which is proposed to be served by a well shall
have an a~ea of less than One acre; and
(h) In a subdivision, where lots are proposed to be
served by individual wells, all lots shall have an area greater
than one acre; and
(c} Where lots are proposed to be served by individual
wells, a hydrologic study shall be conducted which provides a
scientific determination of the quality and quantity of potable
water in the underlying acquifer under both "normal" and
"drought" conditions for the area under consideration; and
(d) Prior to obtaining a building permit, a well shall be
installed, tested and approved on each lot or parcel.
Sec. 20-42.3. Exemption..
Any subdivision granted tentative approval prior to the
effective date of this ordinance shall be exempt from the re-
quirements cf Sections 20-42 20-42.1, 20-4212(a), (b) and (c),
unless tentative approval is not renewed and expires.
10.E. A~4END BUDGET FOR 1987-88 FISCAL YEAR BY INCREASING
APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS IN THE ~340UNT OF $2,500~000 FOR
ACQUISITION OF 182 ACRES OF PROPERTY IN THE VICINITY OF
TB~ CHeSTeRFIeLD COUNTY AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL BARK
Mr. Stegmaier stated this date and time had been advertised for
a public hearing to amend the budget for 1987-88 fiscal year by
increasing the appropriation of funds, in the amount of
$2,500,000, for the acquisition of 182 acres o~ property in the
vicinity 0f the Che~terfleld County Airport Industrial Park.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the matter.
On motion of the Board, it was resolved to authorize the County
Administrator to execute all the necessary documents to borrow
funds up to $2,500~000 at an intermst rate not to exceed the
prime rate for the purchase of 182 acres of land adjacent to
the Airport Industrial Park on which the County holds options;
and further, appropriated $53,000 from the Industrial Park
Reserve Account for payment of interest un the loan in the
current year; amended the budget to appropriate up to
$2,500,000 for the purchase of approximately 182 acres of land
adjacent to the Airport Industrial Park; and adopted the
following Moral Obligation Resolution:
The Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, virginia
hereby resolves that:
Prior to the beginninq of each fiscal year beginning on or
after July 1, 1988, the County Administrator shall submit to
the Board of Supervisors for its consideration a budget with
sufficient funds to make annual payments under the financing
for the purchase of 182 acres adjacent to Route 288 and
referred to in the Attached Assignment of Option Agreements.
The obligation of the County to make any payments under the
financing in respect to any Fiscal Year other than the current
Fiscal Year shall be limited to the amount appropriated by the
Board of Supervisors for such purpose in respect of such Fiscal
Year. In the event the County shall be required by the terms
and provisions of the financing to make any payment under the
financing in respect to any Fiscal Year in an amount in excess
88-40
of the amount appropriated by th~ Board of Supervisors for such
Administrator shall urgently request the Board cf Supervisors
to appropriate an amount sufficient to make such payment. It
is the intent of this resolution that the Board o~ Supervisors
expresses its moral commitment to make the appropriation
rGque~ted hef~in and to the timely repaymen~ of principal and
interest. (A copy of the Assignment of Option A~reements is
filed with the papers of thi~ Board,)
Vote: Unanimous
II.A. APPROPRIATION OF STATE FUNDS FOR DEPUTY POSITIONS AND
CLFR/4-TYBIST FOR SHERIFF
OD ~otion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Hr, Sullivan, the ~oard
appropriated $34,7Q0 in State Compensation Funds %o the
Sheriff's Dep~rtment for three (3) correctional depnty
positions and one (1! clerk-typist po~ition, which were
effective as of January 1, I9~8, and which total cost for
Janna~y-Jnne, 1988, is $3B,900. (It i~ noted %he Compensation
Board will reimburse the County ~cr $34,700 and the balance of
$4,200 will be absorb, d within the Sheriff's current budget.)
NORTHERN AR~A LANDFILL
On motion of Mr. Mayas, secen~e~ by ~r. SulliYan~ the ~oard
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
necessary documents .for'~olicitation o£ bids and award of
uontract tu the lowest re~pon~ive bi,der for tire disposal;
appropriaeed new fee revenue of $9,00Q to cover recycling
costs; and adopted the following fee struet~r= fur tire
disposal at %he Northern Area Landfill:
Individual Tires - $,50/each
Truck Loads - $50./ton
Tires on Rims - $ 5./each
Large T~uck Tire~- $ 8./each
11.C. APPOINTMENTS
11.C.1. CREST~EFI=~D C0~.~UN~TY SERVICES BOARD
On motion of Mr. sullivan, seuonded by Mr. Coffin, the Board
appointed Mr. P~ter C. Ward, representing the Midlothlan
District, to serve on the Chesterfield Community Services
Board, whose term is effective i~ediately and will expire
December 31, I990; and nominated ~r. Herbert T. Sink~
representing the Bermuda ~istrict, to serve on the Chesterfield
Cummunlty Services Board, who~ formal appointment will be madu
on February 10, 1988.
11.C,2. MPO CITIZENS TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
On motion of Mr. Daniel, eeconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board
appointed Mr. ~erb~rt Aichwine to s~rve as one of Chesterfield
County'~ representatives on the MPO Citi2en~ Transportation
Advisory Committee, whose ~erm is effective immediately and
will expire December 31, 1988.
88-41
ll.D. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS
ll.D.1. AGREEMENT FOR ROUTE 10/ROUTE 1 INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board
approved and authorised the County Administrator to execute the
necessary contract, on behalf of the County, with BNE Land and
Development providing for alternative design and construction
improvements for Route 10 at its intersection with Route 1. (A
copy of said contract is filed with the papers of thls Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
ll.D.2. APPROPRIATION FOR STONE PLACEMENT ON TREELY ROAD
On motion of Mr. Mayer, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board
appropriated $500 from the Matoaca District '~hre~ Cent Road
Fund for the placement of atone on Treely Road between Brander~
Bridge Road and Greenbriar Subdivision.
Vote: Unanimous
11.U.3. STORM WATER M~NAGEMENT AGREEMENT-FOSTER MINI-STORAGE
On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute a
Storm Water Managemeht Agreement with the developer of Foster
Mini-Storage as approved by the County Attorney'~ Office. (A
copy of said Agreement is filed with'the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
ll.D.4. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT-CROSS POINTE SHOPPING
CENTER
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute a
Storm Water Management Agreement with the developer of Cross
Pointe Shopping Center as approved by the County Attorney's
Office. (A copy of said Agreement is filed with the papers of
this ~oard.}
ll.D.5~ APPROPRIATION TO STABILIZE ALLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN
NORTH CHEBTERWOOD AND ALICE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION
On motion o~ Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Hayes, the Board
appropriated $500 from the Dale District Three Cent Road Fund
for the purchase of necessary materials to fill potholes and
construct several roadside ditches in the unnamed alley between
UpD street in Alice Heights Subdivision and Benika Drive in
North Cheaterwood Subdivision.
ll.D.6. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION COST APPROVA5
On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board
88-42
$199~0Q for a light at the dead ~nd cf Bermuda Hundred Road,
which funds are to ~e expended from ~Ae ~el~muda District Street
Light F~nd.
lt.D.7. STREE~ LIGHT P~EQUESTS
On motion o~ Mr. Applegate, seconded by Nr. Danielr th~ Board
approved the installation of street lights for the Curve in the
road near 1300 Po¢osheok Boulevard~ with funds to be expended
from the Clover Hill District Street Light Fund; and for the
intersectio~ Of Stable Gate Road/Tree Line Terrace and Paddock
Grove Court/Stable Gate Road, for cost e~timatss only.
ll.D.~. TRANSFER OF FUNDS WITHIN C0~UNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT BUDGET {BELLWOOD/BENSLEY COM~URIT~ IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM)
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Rcard
approvad a total transfer of $23,0DD in fund~ within the
Co, unity Development Block Grant Budget ($1~,000 of consultant
services, 4C4 5~18; and $8,~00 of general ~alarie~, 4C5 5~21)
to the Bellwood/Bensley Community Improvement P/og~am tQ be
used for additional housing rehabilitation.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.E. CONSENT
ll.E.1. O~K LAWN STREET RURAL ADDITION PROJ~CT
On motion of Mr~ Currin~ seconded by ~r. Sullivan, the Board
repealed the following resolution as adopted on April 8, 1987:
~'On motion of Mrs. Girone~ Seconded by-Mr. Dodd, the Board
adopted khe foliowfDg resolution:
~I~ER~A$, Section )~.1-75.1 of the Code o~ Virginia permits
the state Hiqhway and Transportation Board to make an
equivalent matching allocation to any County ~or deslgnationa
by the governing body of up to 25% or $500,000 whichever is
greater of funds received by it during the current fiscal year
pursuant to the "stat~ and LOcal Fiscal ~seistanoe Act of 1972"
for usa by the Stats ~ighway and Transportation Board to
construct, maintain or improve primary and secondary highways
within such County; and
WHEt%~AS, such funds msy be used for br±nginq subdivision
streets used as such prior to January 1, 1976, up to s~andards
sufficient to qualify them for inclusion in the stets SecOndar~
Syst=m; and
W~EPJ~AS, on August 27, 19S6, the Chest~rfleld County Board
o~ Suparviso=s designated from its revenue ~haring funds
$70,000 to be ~atched by the State for the Oak ~awn Strset
prujzct.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors requests the Virginia Departmon~ of Transportation
t~ accept Oak Lawn Street, a length of 0.31 mile, into th~
State Secondary System in accordance with Section 33.1-75.1 of
the Code of Vir~inia~ as amended.
BS IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield COunty Board
o~ Supervisors guarantees to the Commonwealth of Virqinia that
~8-43
utility adjustments on the project will b~ made at no cost to
the State. The Board also guarantees the Commonwealth a fifty
foot unrestricted right-of-way for this street with the
necessary easements for cuts, fills, and drainaqe. This
right-of-way is recorded as follows: Deed Hook 1757, Pag~
1187; Deed Book 1954, Page 1189; Deed Book 1594, Page 1220;
Deed Book 1594, Page 1184; and Deed Book 1813, Paqe 1006.
On motion cf Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Hoard
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Section 33.1-75 of the Code of Virqinia permits
the State Highway and Transportation Board to make an
equivalent matching allocation to any County for designations
by the governing body of up to 25% or $500,000 whichever is
greater of funds received by it during the current fiscal year
pursuant to the "State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972"
for use by the State Highway and Transportation Board to
construct, maintain or improve primary and secondary highways
within such County; and
WI~EREAS, such funds may be used for bringing mubdivision
~treets used as such prior to January 1, 1976, up to standards
sufficient to qualify th~m for inclusion in the State Secondary
System; and
WEEREAS, on August 27, 1986, the Chesterfield County Board
of Supervisors designated from its revenue sharing funds
$70,000 to be matched by the State for the Oak Lawn project;
W/{ER~AS, no speculative interest exists on Oak Lawn
Street.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation
to accept Oak Lawn Street, a length of 0.31 mile, into the
State Secondary System in accordance with Section 33.1-72.1 C1
of the Code of Virginia, as amended.
BE IT FURTheR RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board
of Supervisors guarantees to the Commonwealth of Virginia that
utility adjustments on the project will be made at no cost to
the state. The Board also guarantees to the Commonwealth a
fifty foot unrestricted right-of-way for this street with the
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage. This
right-of-way is recorded as follows: Deed Book 1757, Page
1187; Dead Book 1954, Page 1189; Deed Book 1594, Page 1220;
Deed Book 1594, Page 1184; and Deed Book 1813, Page 1006.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.E.2. REPEAL STATE ROAD RESOLUTION ADOPTED JUNE 10, 1987
ACCEPTING CERTAIN STK~TS AND ADOPT REVISED STATE ROAD
RESOLUTION AMENDMENTS
On motion of Mr. Cnrrin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board
repealed the following resolution as adopted on June 10, 1987:
"This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Johnston Willis Drive, Trade Road and Trade
Court, Clover Hill District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of 'Mr. Applegate,
seconded by Mrs. Girone, it is re~olved that Johnston Willis
88-44
Drive, Trade Road and reads Court, Clover Hill District, be and
they hereby are established ag public roads.
And be it f~rth~r r~olved, tkat the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to taka into the
Secondary System, $ohnsten Willis Drive, beginning at the
intersection with existing Midlothian Turnpike, U.S, Route 60,
and going southerly 0,48 mile to the intersection with Trade
Court; Trade Road, beginning Where Stat~ Maintenance ends,
existing Trade Road, ~tat~ Route 1774, and going easterly 0.15
mile to the intersection with Trade Court; a~d Trade
beginning at ~he intersection with Johnston Willis Drive and
Trade Road and going easberly O.lO mile to end in a cul-de-sac.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance
and designated Uirginia D~parhment of Transpoxtation drainage
These roads serve as aoC~$~ to the adjacent con~rciat
property.
And be it further resolved, that the Soazd of Supervisors
~Barantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 60'
right-of-way for all of these roads except Trade Roa~ which has
a variable width 60' ~ 76' right-of-way.
Johnston Willis Drive. Plat Book 50, Pa~e 11, July 22, 19~5.
Johnston Wi]li~ Drive Phase II. Plat Book 57~ Page 1~, ~ay ~7,
Johnston Willis Drive, Trade Road, and Trade Court. Plat Book
53, Page 12~ June 10, 1986.
This day ~he County Environmental Engineer, in aceomdan~e with
directions from this Board, made r~port in writing ~pen his
examination of Johnston Willi~ Drive, glower Hill District.
Upon consld~ration whereof, and on ~o~ion of ~r. Currin,
s~conded by Mr. ~ulllvan, it is resolved ~kat Johnston Willis
Drive, Clover Hill District, be and it hereb~ is established.as
a public road.
And be it further r~Solve~, thaP the Virginia Department of
Transportation; be and it hereby is ra~ueSted to tak~ into
the Secondary Sy~%em~ Joknstoa Willis Drive, beginning at
the intersection with existin~ Midlothian Turnpike,
Route 60, and goin~ southerly 0.4~ mile to tie into proposed
Johnston Willis Drive.
·his tannest is inclusive oi th~ adjacent slope, sight
distance and designated Virginia ~epart~ent of
Transportation drainage easements.
This road s~rv~ as access to the adjacent ¢ommercia!
property.
An~ ~e it further reso~ve~, that the Board of S~ervisor~
g~a~antees to the Virginia Department Of Transportation
~0' right-of-way for this road.
This road is :eoorded &~ ~ollows:
Johnston Willie D~ive. Plat Book 50, Page 11, July 22,
1985.
88-45
Johnston Willie Drive Phase II.
27, 1986.
Vote: Unanimous
Plat Book 57, Page 18, May
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon hie
examination of Trade Road, Trade Court and ~ohnston Willis
Drive, Clover Hill District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Currin,
seconded by Mr. Sullivan, it is resolved that Trade Road, Trade
Court and Johnston Willis Drive, Clover Hill District, be and
they hereby are established as public roads.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into
the Secondary System, Trade Road, beginning where State
Maintenance ends, existing Trade Road~ State Route 1774, and
going easterly 0.15 mile to the intersection with Trade
Court; Trade Court, beginning at the intersection with
Johnston Willis Drive and T~ade Road and going easterly 0.10
mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and :Johnston Willis Drive,
beginning at the intersection with Trade Road and Trade
Court and going northerly 0.04 mile ~o tie into proposed
Johnston Willis Drive.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, Eight
distance and designated Virginia Department of
Transportation drainage easements.
These roads serve as access to the adjacent commercial
property.
And be it further resolved, that the ~eard of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Tranmportation a
60' right-of-way for all of these roads except Trade Road
which has a variable width 60' to 70' right-of-way.
These roads are recorded as follows:
Johnston Willis Drive, Trade Road and Trade Court. Plat
Book 53, Page 12, June 10, 1986.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.E.3. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE
This day the County Environmental ~ngineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Koger Center Boulevard and Center View Drive,
Midlothian District,
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Currin,
seconded by Mr. Sullivan, it is resolved that Koger Center
Boulevard and Center View Drive, Midlothian District, be and
they hereby are e~tabli~hed as public readE.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into
the Secondary System, Koge~ Centex Boulevard, beginning at
thc inter$eetion with Midlothian Turnpike, U.S. Route 60,
and going northwesterly 0.23 mile to end at the intersection
with Center View Drive and proposed Koger Center Boulevard
extension; and Center View Drive, beqinninq at the
intersection with Koqer Center Boulevard and going
northeasterly 0.16 mile to end at the intersection with
existing Johnston Willis Drive, State Ront~ 777.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight
88-46
Transportation dralnafe easement~.
90' right-of-way for ~oger Center Boulevard and a 60'
right-of-way for Center View Drive.
Plat ~ook ~O, Page $1, Augnst 28, 1985.
ll.B.4. Pd~QU~STS FOR BINGO/RA~FLE
On motion of Mr. Coffin, seconded by Mr,
approved bingo/raffle pe~mits for
for calendar year t988:
ORGANIZATIONS
Manchester Athletic A~ociation
Vote= Unanimous
~ullivan, the Board
the following organizations
IYPB OF PERMITS
Eingo/Raf£1e
Raffle
ll.M. P~SOLUTION REQUESTING CONSIDERATTOM 0T FUNDS TO B~ USED
FOE ~$TQ~ATION OF MAGNOLIA GRANGE
On motion of the Board, the following rssolution wa~ adopted:
W~EREAS, the chesterfield County ~i~tertoal Society has
r~quested funds from the Stats Historical Preservation funds to
be used for the r~atoration of Magnolia Grange; and
W~R~AS, =hess fund~ would be a vital pert in such
restoration_
NOW, THE~2ZFORE BE IT R~$0LVED, that tbs Board of
Superv~zor~ o~ Chest~rSield County ~uppo~%s this request and
respectfully requ~t~ th~ Chesterfield Delegation to work
reward obtaining funds with ~pecial emphasis or moneyz for:
Replacement of original shutters to out~ide of the houss
Installation of shelves fez arckeological display
Repair of chimney~
Installation o~ la~ irrigation
Meat p~p for ~e upstairs
Replacement of carpmt i~ %he hall and ~edr00ms
Development of authentic federal outdoor kitchsn
A~, FURTHER BE IT ~SOLVED, that the Ch~terfield County
Board ~f Sup~rvisur~' urges due consid~ratlon to the~e worthy
Vote: Unanimous
ll.N. R=SQLUTION R~GARDING PROPOSED C~ANGES IN SCHOOL FUNDING
FORMULA
After a brief discussion of a resolution regarding propos~
changes in the school funding ~urmula, it was generally agreed
to defer the matter until ~00 p.m. ~o permit the inclm~ion of
additional data.
88-47
UTILITIES ITEMS
ll.F.1. AUTNORIZE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FOR TN~ D~SIGN O~ UTIS~Ty
RELOCATION AT TEE ETTRICK OVERPASS
On motion of ~. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Currin, tke Board
approved and authorized the design for relocating the existing
water lines within the highway corridors of the Virginia
Department of Transportation project in the vicinity of and
including the intersection of the railroad and Chestenfield
Avenue at the Ettrick Overpass; authorized the County
Administrator to execute any necessary documents fer the
enqineering services to be performed; and transferred funds in
tke amount of $6,500 from 5H-5835-700R to 5B-5217-801M to
complete said project.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.F.2. APPROVAL OF SEWER AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPER PARTICIPATION
FOR EXTENSION OF TRUNK SEWER ALONG CROOKED BRANCE
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
necessary documents, en behalf of the County, for Sewer
Contract Numbe~ S86-1CD/7(8)601M, for developer participation,
for extension of a trunk sewer aleng Croeked Branch (Project
S85-57CD), with Charles E. Bailey, Inc., which agreement
provides that the developer pay the County $4,100.00 prior to
making the first connection to the public sewer system in Salem
Oaks Subdivision.
ll.F.5. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO ~0N~TRUCT AND 0P~R~TK A
PRZVAT~ S~WAG~ PU~PING STATION AND FORCE MAIN
On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board
approved a request for bhe construction and operation of a
private sewage pumping station and force main to serve a 245+
acre residential development located north of Robiou$ Road an~
west of James River West, which reques~ is subject to an
agreement acceptable to the County Attorney being recorded
covering tke operation and maintenance of the facility. (It is
noted the developer has agreed ~c pan~icipate in the cost of
construction for ~hat portion which extends across h~s property
and that the pump station will be abandoned and the system
connected to the County gravity sewer system when it becomes
available.)
Vote: Unanimous
ll.F.3. CONSENT I~EMS
ll.F.3.a. DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG EAPPY EILL ROAD FROM MR, AND
MRS. GEORGE O. LEWIS
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr, Currin, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
necessary deed of dedication accepting, en behalf of the
County, the conveyance of e 30' strip of land along Rappy Nill
Road from Mr. George 0. Lewis and Mrs. Betty ~elson Lewis. (A
copy of the plat is file~ with the papers of this Soard.)
Vote: Unanimous
88~48
FIELD COMMERCE CENTER
O~ motion of Mr. Mayas, s~conde~ by Nr. Currin, the Beard
%he necessary deed of dedication accepting, en behalf of the
Ceunty, the conveyahce of a variable width mtrip'of land along
Bran~hway Road from Chesterfield Cc~mueroe Center. {A copy of
the plat is filed with the papers of thim Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
DEED OF D~D!CATION OF CB~ST~U~ HILL ROAD FROM MR. AMD
MRS. THOMAS H. JOHNSON AND MR. AND MRS. DAVID
O0~O~, JR.
0a mo~ien of ~z. Mayas, seconded by ~r. Currin~ the B~ard
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute ths
the necessary deed of dedication accepting, on ~ehalf of tbs
County~ ~h~ ~enve~ance of a variable width right-of-way known
as Chestnu~ ~ill Road from Mr. Thomas ~atcher Johnson and Mrs.
Sandra W+ JOhnSon, {husband and wife), and Mr. Dmvid Aaron
Johnson, Jr., and Mrs. Maxine Collins Johnmen, ~husband and
wife,. ~A copy of the plut is filed with the papers of this
Boara.l
Mr. ~al~ preseD%~ the Board with a report on t_he dsveloper
water ant sewer contracts executed by the County Administrator.
11.O. REPORTS
~r. Ramsay presented the Board with a status report on tks
Reserve Fund~ Di~trie~ Roa~ and Street Light F~nds, Leass
Purchases, School Literary Loans and the School Board Agenda,
as well mm a $chc4ule Of the ~oa~d of Supervisors meeting~ and
Mr. R~sey ~tated the Virginia Department of Transportation ham
iorma!ly notified the County of She aoceptanoe of the followlnq
additions t0~ discontinuances and abandonment from th~
ADDITIONS LENGTH
Deotions 8, 9 and 10 of new location Route 637. 0.lZ
Section~ 11 and 13 of new location Route 641 0.29
WHITESTONE - SECTION 2
Route 2687 {Wadsworth Drive) - From Route 272~ to
U.1D mile north of Route 2728
O. lS ~4i.
DISCONTINUANCES
Sections 1, 2, ~ and 4 of old location Route 637 0.24 Mi.
Sections 5, 6 and 14 of old location Route 641 0.25 Mi.
~BANDONME~T
Seotion 7 of old location Route 641
Beard reuessud at 11:30 a.m. to travel to the Airport
88-49
Industrial Park to attend the official groundbreaking
ceremonies for Scandinavian Enterprise Center Virginia, Inc.
ll.I. GROUNDBREAKING CEREMONY FOR SCANDINAVIAN ENTERPRISE
CENTER VIRGINIA~ INC.
The Board participated in the groundbreaking ceremonies with
officials and guests of Scandinavian Enterprise Center
Virginia, Inc.
ll.J. AND R. LUNCH AND ~X~CUTIV~ SESSION
The Board traveled to the Crosswind Restaurant at the County
Airport for lunch.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board went
into Executive Session to consult with legal counsel concerning
pending litigation between Chesterfield County and Government
Leasing and Crockett versus the Chesterfield County Police
Department, pursuant to Section 2.1-344 (a) (6) of the Coda of
Virginia, 1950, as amended.
Reconvening:
Mr. Applegate called the meeting to order at 2:0~ p.m. (EST).
ll.N. R~SOLUTION REGARDING PROPOSED CHANGES IN SCHOOL FUNDING
FOPJ~ULA
There was discussion regarding the recent joint Legislative
Audit and Review Cemmi~sion's study and the Governor's budget
which recommend drastic changes in the funding formula for
basic aid funding to local school systems, which the Board
generally agreed would drastically reduce funding for
localities such as Chesterfield which have large school age
populations and families with more than one income and would be
detrimental to the quality of education provided to the
students/citizens of Chesterfield County.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, public education is a high priority oi the Board
of Supervisors and the resident~ of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Governor and the joint Legislative Audit and
Review Commission have reco~ended a change in the funding
formula for basic aid £unding to local school systems to
provide more weight be given to adjusted gross income; and
WHEREAS, the Governor has submitted a budget which
recommends drastic change~ in %he formula for funding of the
standards of quality; and
WHEREAS, the proposed formula shifts to localities some of
the ce~t of items such as employee fringe benefits that had
been paid primarily by state funds; and
88-50
WHEREAS, the proposed formula, by replacing dhe personal
income componend with an adjusted gross income oompenent, tends
to reduce funding for localities such as Ch~de~fi~ld that have
la~g~ ~ChoO1 age populations and families with more than one
WHEREAS~ local governments currently have no mean~ to l~vy
taxes against income, therefore, replacement or new revenue~
cannot be raised from thi~ ~ourc~; and
WHEREAS, %h~ prOpOSed funding formula will result in a 0%
increase in per pupil funding {~rom $1,539.17 to $1,539.32) for
Chesterfield County and wilt rg~ul~ in a decrease of
approximately five million doltar~ in funding in 19S9 compared
to the current formula~ and
WEERE~S, the proposed funding formula provides ne funds
for censtr~atlen er debt service tn pay the co,ts of housing
new students, but allocates forty-eight million dollars for
salary differeatials for teachers in Northern Virginia.
NOW, T~ER~EO~ ~ IT RESOLVED. that th~ Board of
Supervisors requests that the County's 5egis!ative Delegation
work to Dre~erve the ex£zting ~undinq formula and ~n~ure that
changes will nod p~nallze looallties by reda¢ing funding below
the level provided by the current formula and reque~t~ an
oppOrtuDity to me~t with the Delegation and the Governor to
~iacue~ the formula's impact on %h~ County.
COURT
0D motion ef ~r. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. ~ani~I, the Board
~ugpended the ~ul~s to permit discussion of a resolution
supporting the continued ~unding of thre~ judges to ~erve the
Twelfth District General D~strlct Court.
Voter Unan~/~ous
There was discussion that consideration was ~eing given to
deleting one of the three judgeships a~igned to the
Chesterfield County General District Court, which the Board
generally aqree~ would be detrimental to the quality of
criminal justice gervice provide~ to the citizens of the
County.
On motion of the Board~ the following resolution wa~ adopted:
WREREA$, Chesterfield County General District Court i~ i~
the 11th Judicial Circuit of virginia which ranks in the top
third in terms of caseload of all district courts in the
Commonweal:h; and
W~EEA~, Chesterfield County District Court has operated
effectively with three judges assigned crlminal~ traffic and
oiwil cases; and
W~E~EAS, Chesterfield District Court haz shared the use of
One General District Court judge with th~ Colonial Meiqh=s
WHEREAS, new cases handled by the Chesterfield District
Court have remained h~gh at approximated 51,0OO per year
representing a very active court~ and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County represent~ on~ cf the fastest
growing localities in the Co~monwealth ranking 5th in terms of
increased population between 1980 and 1985; and
WB~RRAS, all Chesterfield County criminal justiee
departments are growing steadily to keep pace with cazeload and
service level demands.
NOW, THEP~3FORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of SupervisQrs supports the continued funding of
three judges to support the Chesterfield County General
District Courts to adequately serve the citizens and justice
community of Chesterfield County.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.K. REQUESTS FOR ~ZONING
88S014
In Dale Ma'gisterial District, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY requested
rezening from Agricultural (Al and Residential (R-7) to Light
Industrial (M-l) with Conditional USe Planned Development. An
industrial complex is planned. This request lies on a 182 acre
pareel fronting approximately 2,400 feet On the south line of
Belmont Road, approximately 1,800 feet west of Licking Creek
Drive. Tax Map 64 (1) Parcel 109 and Tax Map 78 {1) Parcel 25
(Sheets 21 and 22).
Mr. Jacobsen stated at its January 19, 1988 meeting the
Planning Commission deferred this came for thirty (30) days to
allow the applicant and the Dale District Commissioner an
opportunity to meet with area property owners to discuss the
project, which, consequently, necessitates Board deferral of
the request also.
There was no opposition present to the deferral.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
deferred consideration of Case 88S014 until Pebruary 24, 1988.
Vote: Unanimous
87HP014
Landmark Designation for CLOVER HILL. Located in Matoaca
Magi~terlal District on propsrty fronting the east line of
Coalboro Road, approximately 1,000 feet north of Beaver Bridge
Road and Winterpock Read, and better known as 16401 Clover Rill
Road. Tax Map 108 (1) Parcel 6 and Tax Map 108-9 (1) Parcel 7
(~heet 28).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission and Preservation
committee recommended approval of Landmark Designation for
Clover Hill, based on the following findings:
1. This is a distinguished building of high
architectural quality and historic interest; and
2. This designation will cause no significant adverse
effect On the future devslepment of the County.
There was no opposition presenb.
Mr. Currin excused himself from the meeting.
On motion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Applegate,- the Board
approved historic landmark designation for Clover
Hill--described as follows:
Clover Hill ~ocated in Ma=dues Magisterial District on
property fronting the east line of Coalboro Road, and the north
line of winterpock Road, being ldcated on Parcel 6, Tax Map 108
88-52
(1) and Parcel 7, Tax Map 1Q$-9 (1) and better known az 16401
Clover Bill Road.
Ayes: Mr. Applegat~, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mayas.
Absent: Mr. Currin.
Mr. Currin returned to the meetinq.
87S079
I~ Clever Hill Magisterial bis%rio~, COUNTRY FARMS CONVENIENCE
MARTS ASSOCIATES requested resorting from R~siden%ial (R-?) to
Conditional Use Planned Development. A retail/c£fiQe complex is
planned. Thi~ request lies on a 4.5 acre parcel fronting approx-
imately 266 feet on the north line of Hull Street Road, also
fronting approximately ?0O Seat on Pccoshock Boulevard, and
located in the northwest quadrant of th~ intersection of these
reads. Tax Map 40-5 {1) Parcel 14 (She~t 15~.
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recommended denial
of this request because they felt the proposed us~ was too
approval of the request base~ oD the fact that, while the
Area Land U~e and Transportation ~la~, the proposed land nses
containing approx/nately 842 signatur~$ in opposition t6 the
Mr. Dicks, representing the applicant, presented an overview of
acceptable. E~ ~tated, ~Ithough he met with area citizen~ no
neighborhoods of Longwood Asres, ~edford, Lynndale and Lake
the adverse impact of the development on the residential
operation, deprsoiatlon of property values, the potential for
the project, loitering, traffic, etc. He stated the applicant
has attempted to addr~s~ th~ concerns by ~-he proffered
the subject property and the possibility of joint zoning with
Undefined retail uses, shar,d ingress/~gre~, traffic volumes
and distribution patterns, etc.
Mr. Daniel stated, he had a problem w~th the proposed
convenience store and qasoline pump~ aS depicted in the Master
88-~3
office complex for the entire section as well as rework the
ingress/egress design, he could not support the request.
Mr. Mayes stated he felt the people living in tkis community
have developed a quality of life to which they have the right
to enjoy without the intrusion of a business venture into their
neighborhood. Ne stated, given thc choice, he would vote in
favor of the community.
Mr. Sullivan ~tated he did not feel the proposed use would
intrude into a residential neighborhood since the subject
property along Route 360 is commercial property and office
and/or commercial uses ~×ist along this section of Pocoshock
Boulevard. He stated he supports the Overlay District
Standards as guidelines and feels they are sensible. He stated
the Board is seeking planned, well managed development of the
highest caliber for the County and for that reason he could not
support the proposed request. He urged those present to work
together to achieve an appropriate development for the area.
Mr. Currin stated he felt the residential communities have a
right to enjoy the quality of life which they have developed;
however~ on corridors such as Route 360, he saw nothing wrong
with a convenience mart and office complex. He stated he did
feel, however, the developer needed additional property for
this project and he could not ~uppprt the request as currently
styled.
Mr. Applegate stated he had worked ~ closely with both the
developer and area residents On this project, and he felt there
had been vast improvement~ over the application as originally
submitted. Be addressed concerns previously discussed
(compatibility, land use transition, traffic concerns,
appropriatenes~ of proposed use, etc.) but stated, while the
proposed soning does not conform to the Northern Area Land Use
and 'Transportation Plan, the proposed uses and recommended
conditions ensure an appropriate land use transition and the
Conditional Use Planned Development process generally ensures
compliance with the Corridor Overlay District standards. He
stated given these circumstances and appropriate modifications
to the conditions, he would propose approval.
Mr. Applegate moved approval subject to the following
conditions which Mr. Mayes seconded to permit discussion but
indicated he intented to vote against:
1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan
prepared by Miggins Associates, Inc., dated June 29, 1987,
shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
2. Prior to the issuance o£ a building permit, thirty-five
(35) feet of right of way, measured from the centerline of
Pocoshock Boulevard, shall be dedicated, to and for the
County Of Chesterfield, free and unrestricted. (T)
3. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, an
additional lane of pavement, curb, and gutter shall be
constructed along the entire property frontage of both
Hull Street Road and Pocoshock Boulevard. (T)
4. Signs shall comply with the "Special Sign District"
~equirements for office parks, shopping centers, or
~imilar groups cf buildings, except that the Convenience
Business (B-l} tract ~hatl be considered a separate
development ~rom thc Office Business (O) tract. Land-
soaping shall be installed around the base of freestanding
signs. (P)
5. Uses permitted in the Convenience Business (B-l) tract
shall be limited to those uses permitted in the B~i
District plus gasoline sales. Uses permitted in the
88-54
OSfic~ Business (O) tract shall be limited to those
permitted in the O District.
And further, the Board accepted the following proffered
conditions:
1. The project shall have an ingreund e~finkl~r ~y~tom and
the grass areas will ~e sodded, not seeded.
2. The roofing materials on all structures will be limited to
cedar shake roofing.
3. Country Farms Convenience Marts~ as developer, agrees
purchase from Saxr~ywood Land Corporation the 3.0 acre
portion of the total 4.5 acre parcel. Country Farms
Convenience Marts, through one of it's affiliated
companies, agrees to develop the 3.0 acre portion of the
4.~ a~r~ parcel as an office park as generally depicted on
the Master Plan prepared by ~i~gins & Associates, Inc.,
dated June 29, 1987, and as amended at the time of
schematic site plan review.
In accordance with ~egulations promulgated by the
Al=oholic Beverage Commission, the Breeze-In
Stole stall not sell or permit to ~e sol~ any alcoholic
beverages of any kin~ whatsoever between the hours of
12:00 Midnight and 6:00 a.m., daily, seven days per weak.
5. The Breeze-In Convenien~ Store shall not operate
during the hours of 12:00 Midnight and 6:00 a.m., daily,
6. There ~hall b~ no laundromat located in the ~reeee-In
Convenience Center~ as requested by various citizens in
the urea.
?. The'landscaping shall inelud~ e×~ensive screening of the
Breeze-In Convenience Center from the office park through
approved by staff at the time of schematic site plan
review for the office park portion Q~ the project.
The Board being polled, the vote was as follows:
Mr. Mayas:
~r. Sullivan: ~ay,
Mr. Currin: Nay.
Mr. Applegate:
It was generally agreed to recess for five (5) minute~.
Reconvening:
In Matoaca Magisterial Distriot~ .EAELE SPENCER, JR. r~q~e~te~
Conditional U~ ~lanned DcYelo~me~t to ~ermit a 0onvenienc=
store with gasoline sails and bulk (setback) ~xo~ptions in an
Agricultural (A) District on a 1.7 acre parcel fFonting
proximately 3~5 feet on the northeast lin~ of ¢~uito Eoad, also
fronting approximately 450 feet on the west line of Courthous~
Road, and located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection
of these roads. Tax Map 63-3 (I) Parcels I3 and 50 (Sheet 21).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Cemnission and staff
recommended denial of this request based on the fact that
neither plan submitta~ by the applicant conformed to the
minimum design criteria for development of this site under
the Overlay District standards, approval of commercial land
uses in this area could establish a precedent for further
expansion of similar uses from Route 360 along Courthouse and
Genito Roads, and would be inconsistent with previous actions
regarding contmercial uses at this intersection~ He stated
should the' Board' see fit to approve this request staff has
recommended certain conditions be imposed; however, it should
be noted that staff does not feel these conditions mitigate the
c0neerne as outlined previously. He further noted staff has
received one (1) letter of opposition to and seventeen (17)
letters in favor of this request, as well as a petition
containing sixty-six (66) signatures of area property owners in
favor of the development.
Mr. Currin disclosed to the Board that, although he has no
financial interest in the subject property, One of his
associates is involved in this venture, and he has been advised
by the County Attorney that he did not have a conflict oi
interest and could vote on this request.
Mr. Dean Hawkins, representing the applicant, presented a brief
overview of the request and Stated the applicant feels he has
adequately addressed concerns of both staff and area residents.
Ms. Lois May Allard, who resides with her mother on the subject
property, stated cut-through traffic necessitates many
unnecessary repairs and expenses to maintain the site and
indicated her mother would like to sell the property.
Mr. Rusty Wrenn, Chairman of the Board of Directors for Great
Oaks Homeowners Association, voiced opposition to the proposed
request; expressed concerns relative to the design criteria for
development of the subject site, the establishment of a
precedent !or further expansion of similar uses from Route 360
along Courthouse and Genito Roads, compatibility, traffic
congestion, safety hazard~ at the intersection, ingress/egress
to the proposed site, etc.; and submitted petitions containing
approximately 10~ signatures of area residents in opposition to
this request.
Mr. Hawkins stated the applicant has attempted to address
residents' concerns and comply with the requirements imposed on
the project, with the exception of those previously noted.
Mr. Daniel stated he felt this situation was very unusual and
he did not want to deny the request but, at the same time, was
reluctant to support it. Ne questioned if a corridor study for
this area could be undertaken in order to determine if the
designated land use is the highest and best use of the
property. Mr. Ramsay stated, to achieve results within ninety
(90) days, other projects/studies would be delayed. Mr. Daniel
stated he felt he could possibly support this request if it
were modified slightly and fit within the recommendation of the
General Plan; that he did not want to jeopardize the selling of
the property for those families involved but, at the same time,
wanted to be fair to the County and the r~mainder of the
taxpayers as well, and, at this point, felt uncomfortable
taking any action.
Mr. Sullivan agreed that the best design of the subject
property had been accomplished, however, he felt there was
insufficient property for development of the site. He
concurred with Mr. Daniel's comments; however, agreed with
staff/Planning Commission recommendations for denial based on
the reasons as outlined in the Request Analysis and stated he
could not support the request.
Mr. Currin stated he could not support the request as he felt
there was insufficient acreage for development of the site, and
other options should be considered/evaluated.
88-56
Mr. Appleqa~e sta~ed he felt the ~eard should give
considerution tc the property owner~ who were in this area
prior to the development of Great oaks and other area
subdivisions; he added Genltc and Courthouse Roads are heavily
traveled and inquired if the proposed development would
generate more average daily trips than that which iS alrea~y
utilizing the road.
Mr. McCracken indicated 30-40% of user traffic for the proposed
development is already utilizing Ganito/Courthouse Roads.
Mr. ~awkins stated the aDp%isant felt he had sufficient land
for developing the praiser; however, the possibility of
acquiring additional acreage could be investigatsd.
Mr. Mayas statad he did not feel osrtain concerns of his had
been satimfied, and he wa~ not prepared to recommend approval
of the request. Hs s~ats~ ha would llke the applicant to
provide documentation that the request is in compliance with
the Overlay District standards, in oc%mplianee with county
setback requirements, that the access plan is acceptable to the
County Transportation Department and the Virginia Department of
Transportation, and that 75% of adjacent property owners
support the request.
After further ~iscussion, Nr. Hawkins stated a thirty (38) days
deferral was acceptable to the applicant.
On motion of Mr. Currin, ~econd~d by. Mr, M'aya~, =he Board
de~erred ¢cnslderatlcn of Case S7S150 ~ntil February 2~, 1988,
Ayah= Mr. Appleqate, Mr. C~rrin, Mr. Daniel and ~r. Mayas.
Nays: Mr. Sullivan.
87S097
In Dale Ma~isterial District, RICHARD M. ALLEN requested
r~zoninq f~om Agricultural (A) tO COn, unity ~usiness (S-2) with
Conditional U~e Planned Development. A shoppin~ center is
plannsd. This request lies on a 3.5 acre parcel fzenting approx-
imately ~85 feet ~ the mor%h line of Centralia Road, approxi-
mataly 250 feat east cf Iron Bridge Road. Tax zap 96-9 (1)
Parcel 9 (Sheet 31).
Mr. Jacob~on stated the Planning Commission recommended denial
af the r~quest for Community Business (~-2) ~oninq an~ approval
of office Business {o~ with Conditional Use Planned
Development, subject to certain eonditions$ staff recommended
denial of CoK~unity Business (B-2) and approval of rezonin~ to
office ~usiness (O) with Conditional Uss Planned Development to
allow office use with some limited retail uses~ subject to
certain conditions.
~r. Richard Allan stated he fs!t Community ~usiness (B-2)
are mor~ appropriate for ~h~ subject property than Or, ica
Business (O) uses and would net adversely impact anyone. He
requested relief from the fifty (50) foot buffer requirement in
Condition 1 and Notes (a) and (h~ in Condition 6.
Ms. Dale Smith, an adjacent property owner, voiced
drainage, aesthetics, conformance with ~he Overlay District
property~ etc. She ~tated she felt the applicant should be
required ~o comply with the Overlay District Standards the same
a~ other developers in the area and ~hat offic~ uses were
a~propriate.
Mr. kpplegate stated there appeared to be too many variables in
this request and stated he felt it needed further discussion.
~r. Daniel stated Aa would continue to require the Overlay
District Standards where applicable, did not feel Community
susiness (S-2) uses were appropriate for the subject site,
could not agree to 25% retail development for the proposed site
and suggested a thirty (30) day deferral so the applicant and
Ms. smith could meet to discuss a compromise with respect to
development of the properties.
Mr. A~len stated a thirty (30) day deferral would be
acceptable.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr, Sullivan, the Board
deferred consideration of Case 87S097 until February 24, 1988.
Vote: Unanimou~
87S109 (Amended)
In Bermuda Magisterial District, WKH~/WPVA RADIO requested a
Conditional Use to permit a radio station and professional
offices in an Agricultural (A) District. This request lies in
Agricultural (~) and Community Business (B-2) Districts on a
4.t acre parcel lying approximately 200 feet off the west line
of JeffersOn Davis Highway, approximately 360 feet north of
Forest Lake Road. Tax Map 133-3 (2) Mid-City Farms, Block A,
Part of Lot 6 (Sheet 41).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of Case 87S109, subject to certain conditions.
Mr. Jeff Collins, representing the applicant, stated the
recommended conditions were acceptable.
There was no opposition present.
On motion ef Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board
approved Case 87S109, subject to the following conditions:
The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by Charles C. Towne~ and Associates, P.C., dated
April 30, 1987, shall be considered the Master Plan.
2. A fifty (50) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
western property line. With the exception of utilities,
which run generally perpendicular through the buffer, and
a fence, if desired, which shall be located along the
eastern edge of the buffer, there shall be no other facil-
ities or other improvements permitted within this buffer.
Existing vegetation within the buffer shall be supplement-
ed with landscaping so as to minimize the view of the
development from residential property to the west. A
conceptual landscaping plan depletin9 these requirements
shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval
in conjunction with site plan review. A detailed land-
scaping plan depicting these requirements shall be submit-
ted to the Planning Departmsnt for approval within sixty
(60} days of rough clearing and grading. (P)
3. Public water and sewer shall be used. (U)
4. Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed around the
perimeter of all driveway and parking areas. (EE)
(Note: The Zoning Ordinance requires the paving of drive-
ways and parking areas for six (6) or mere vehicles.)
5. Uses permitted shall be restricted to those permitted in
the Office Business (0) District, plus a radio station.
57SI54
In Bermuda Magisterial District, JOR%~ W. ROEERT~ requested
rezoning from Aqr~culturaI {A) to Light Industrial (M-11. A~
industrial complex is planned. This request lies on a 154 acre
parcel 9renting approximately 3,200 feet on the east line of
the Eichmond-~etcrsburg Turnpike, also fronting approximately
3,725 feet on the west line of Woods Edge Road, a~d located
approximately 1,000 fee% month o~ the intersection o~ these
roed~. Tax Map 134-13 (1) Pareels 7 and 9; Tax Map 133-16
Parcel t; and Tax ~ap 149-4 {%) Parcel i (Sheets 41 and
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recentmended
approval of this ~egu=st and acceptance of the pro,fared
conditions. He noted staff had recelvcd eno {1) letter of
opposition to thi~ requeut.
Mr. John Cogbill, representing the applicant, stated the
recommendation was acceptable.
There was no opposition preuent.
On motion 0% ~r. Currln, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board
approved Ca~ 87~15~ and accepted the following proffered
uonditions:
1. There shall bs no unpainted ma%al buildings. In addition,
no building facade visible from Interstate 9~ or Woods
~dqe Road shall be oOnctructed of untreated concrete
masonry units or ~nadcrn~d corrugated steel and/or
adorne~ sheet metal. If at the ti~e cf ~ite plan review,
the portion of the property ~u~ject to the site plan
review is then adjacent to residentially zoned property,
then, in that event, no building facade of untreated
concrete masonry units or unadorned corrugated steel
and/or sheet metal shall be permitted on such parcel if
such facade is visible fro~ the regidentially uuned prop-
arty. In conjunctions with any required fina~ ~ite plan
review~ colored renderings ur elevations cf structures
shall ~c submitted to the Planning Department for
approval.
site~ ~haI1 he designed and buildings shall bm oriented
from Interstate 95, or from properties adjaceut to the
subject property that ams zoned residential at the ti~e of
site plan review.
3. Mechanical units visible from Inter,rate 95, WoOds Edge
Koad, or properties adjacent to the sub,eot proDemty t~at
are zoned residential at the %i~e o~ site plan review
shall, in order tc reduce the visual impact of such units,
be painted in snbdue~ colors, coordinated wi~h the colors
of the building served by-such units or, i~ such surfaces
cannot bs painted, the~ screened or otherwise incorporated
4. All public and private roads~ driveways, leading a~eas and
parking areas shall be paved with concrete, bituminous
concrete, or similar material, su~faee treated parking
area~ and drives shal~ b~ prohibited, concrete curb an~
gut%er, as deemed necessary by the Environmental Engineer-
ing bep~rtmen= ~or drainage and/or erosion control
po~e~, shall be installed around th~ perimeter of all
paved areas.
5. A 100-foot buffer (measured from the centerline Of Woods
Edge Road) shall be maintainea adjacent to Woods Edge
Road. No b=itdings, parking or other facilities, except
signs, shall be permitted within this buffer. Public
88-59
roads, driveways, and utilities shall be permitted through
this buffer upon approval of the Planning and Transporta-
tion Department. At the time of any required site plan
review for any individual parcel or lot abutting thc
buffer, a conceptual landscaping plan shall bo submitted
to the Planning Department for approval. The conceptual
landscaping plan shall include the general location cf
existing vegetation to be retained and the location of
proposed vegetative screening and buf£er$. A detailed
landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Planning De-
par~ent for review and approval within ninety (90) days
after rough clearing and grading of each site for which a
conceptual landscaping plan has been submitted.
Signs shall comply with the requirement of the Zoning
Ordinance, with the exception that no outdoor advertising
signs (i.e., billboards) and no roof monnted signs shall
be permitted.
7. Public water and sewer shall be used.
8. The owners of the property to the north of the subject
property, to the extent such property is Zoned industrial,
shall be permitted to use any public or private roadway
constructed through the subject property; provided, howev-
er, that the owner or developer of the subject property
shall (a) have no obligation to secure any easements or
riqhts of way to facilitate such use by neighboring prop-
erty owners and (b) be entitled to establish the location
and alignment of any such roadway, subject to the approval
of the Planning Department. At the time of first site
plan eubmission~ a conceptual access plan shall be submit-
ted for review and approval and, at the time of site plan
review oi any property adjacent to the roadway, a detailed
access plan showing access to such parcel shall be submit-
ted for review and approval.
9. Prior to any regulred site plan approval for proposed
development of the subject property, a traffic impact
analysis shall be submitted to and approved by the
Transportation Department, provided that such analysis
identifies permitted densities and describes any mit-
igating roadway improvements necessary to maintain a
"D" level of service on Woods Edge Road.
10. A portion or portions of the subject property adjacent to
Woods Edge Road, of dimensions adequate to provide a
45-foot right of way (measured from the present
centerline) for such road, shall be dedicated to the
County of Chesterfield as a "widening strip" for the
future improvement of such roads. Such dedication
shall be accomplished prior to issuance of any building
permit.
11.
Ail sfte lighting shall be such that the direct or re-
flected illumination from such lighting does not exceed
0.5 foot-candles above background, as measured at the
lot line of any properties adjacent to the subject
property that is zoned r~sidential at the time of site
plan review or at the lot line of property along the
east line of Woods Edge Read that is adjacent to the
subject property.
Vote: Unanimous
$75158
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, BULLOCK CORPORATION
requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Convenience
Business (B-l) to permit a rest home on a 10.4 acre parcel
88-60
frontin~ approximately 105 f~et on the south line cf Mull
Street Roan, approximately 1,lO0 feet west of Poeoshook
Boulevar~ Tax Map 39-9 (t) Parcel 10 (Sheets ~4 and 15).
Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Cor~isslon recommended
approval of this request and acceptance of the proffered
cendition~.
recommendation was acceptable.
Mr. Alan Barnes, representing the Surrel~wcod Civic Association,
stated the ccK~unity supports the request.
There wac no opposition pre~ent.
On motion cf Mr. App!egate, secondsd by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved Case 87St58 and accepted the follow, ns proffered
conditions:
1. Uses shall be Iimi~ed to a rest kom~, home for adults,
retirement service center, or related medical facility.
3- There shat~ be an equal volume compensation in.~he event
of any fill ha~ng placed in the floodplain~
4. Proposed s~ruct~re shall have a residential ~xterior
appearance. ~hall be constructed of brick or brick
veneer, provided however the cost would not be such
that it would not be economically feasible. The back
up exterior finish would be dry, it.
5. AS many e~isting trees as po~sibl~ 9hall be retained,
however, underbrush shall be cleared to creat~ m park-like
setting.
6. Thi~ facility shall not be utilized as ~ mental h~a!~h
:reagent facility unless developer/owner notifies the
7. Developer/owner agrees to furnish ~exley, Surreywood and
Lonpwood Acres Civic Associations with a copy of their
si~e plans at the time sit~ plans are submitted to the
County for approval. ~ssoclatlons will have 72 hours,
excluding weaksnd~ to submit comments to the County.
87~164
In C~over ~ill Magisterial District, C~S~FI~LD
ASSOCIATES requested amendment to Conditional Uae Planned
~avelopment (Case 82S039) relativ~ ~o signs. This ~equest lies
in an Office Business {O) District on an '8.0 a~re parcel
fronting approximately 470 feet On the south line of
Tmr~pike, approximately 70 feet east of Moorefield Park Drive.
Tax Map 17-~2 (1) Parc~% 3S (Sheet
~r. 3aeobsen ~tat~d the Planning Commission rsso~mendsd.
approval of thi~ req~est~ ~ubje~t to a single eendifion.
Mr. Gary gcSherry, representin~ %he applicant, ~stat~d +-he
r~eommended condition was
There was ne opposition present.
On motion cf Mr. Applmga%e, seconded ~y Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved Case 87s164, ~ubject to the following condition:
88-61
A single freestanding sign shall be permitted along Route
60 identifying the Sheraton Bark Mouth Hotel. The sign
shall be as depicted in the elevations and Textual
Statement submitted with the application relative to
materials, color, lighting, height, and size. All other
signs shall be as regulated by the Zoning Ordinance. for
the Office Business (O) District. (P)
(Note: This condition is in addition to Condition 19 of
Case 82S039.)
87S165
In Clover Mill Magisterial District, LEMTER ~. LONG, MR. AND
CHARLSIE L. LONG requested Conditional Use to permit a second
dwelling in a Residential (R-7) District on a 0.22 acre parcel
fronting approximately 70 feet on the east line of Kingsport
Lane, .approxlma~ely 210 fee~ south of Amster Road. Tax Map 29-6
(2) Southaven, Section 2, Block D, Lot 15 (Sheet
Mr. Jacobsen stated the ~lanning Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to certain conditions.
Mr. Lester Long, Mr. sta~ed the recommended conditions were
acceptable.
When asked, Mr. Bernie Schmeltz stated Mr. Long had complied
with the requirements of Condition 5.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board
approved Case 87S165, subject to the following conditions=
1. Occupancy of the ~¢cend dwelling unit shall be limited to
quests or family members of the property owner. At no
time shall the second dwelling unit be rented or sold as
separate use, unless and until the lot is rezoned to
permit such renting or sal~.
2. Prior to iesuance of an occupancy permit, the applicant
shall record a deed restriction indicating the requirement
in Condition 1.
This use shall run with the land. (P)
4. Public water and sewer shall be used. (U)
5. The applicant shall request in writing to the Department
of Utilities a waiver of Section 20-1.29 of the Ordinance
which requires separate water/sewer service cennections
for each dwelling unit. Any waiver granted will apply to
the Longs only and will not be transferrable to subsequent
property owners. If subsequent p~operty owners do not
apply for and receive waivers to Section 20-1.29 of the
Utility Ordinance, they must provide individual con~
nections as required by the Code. (U)
6. At such time as the proposed second dwelling ceases to be
occupied by guests or family members of the property
owner, the water/sewer service lines shall be disoon~
nected so that the structure can no longer be used as a
dwelling unit. (U)
Vote: Unanimous
88~62
In Clover ~itl ~agisterial District, THE PENN COMPANY requested
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Rs$idential (R~lS). A single
family residential subdivision is planned. This request lies.
on an 11.8 acre parcel f~Ontlng approximately 583 feet on the
~cuthwest llne cf ~icks Road~ approximately 220 feet northwest
of Mountain Pins Boulevard, also located approximately 100 feet
off the northern terminu~ of Wathala Drive. Ta/¢ Map 39-2
Part of Parcel 13 (Sheet
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to a ~ingle condition.
Mr. Delmonte L~wis, rcprssentinq the applicant, stated the
reconn~nd~d ~on~itloD was acceptable.
There was no opposition
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconde~ by Mr. Mayas, the Board
approvsd Case 87S169, snbject to tbs following condition:
A fifty (58~ foot building ~etback and buffer ~trip,
exclusiwe of easements, shall be provided along
Road. Prior to recordation of subdivision plats, the
d~veloper shall ~lag the buffsr for inspection 'by the
Planning Department. The area within thi~ buff~ shall be
planted and/or !eft in its natural state, if there
sufficient vegetation to provide adequate screening. If
sufficient vegetation does not exist, a lmnd$cape plan
~hall be approved by th~ Plannit9 Department and a bond
posted to cover the cost of implementing ~h~ plan, prie~
to recordation of ~ubdivlsion plats. One (1] access to
Hicks ROad for the existing house shall be permitted.
This building setback and buffer strip shall be noted on
final check and rscord plats. The Planninq Commission may
modify %~his condition at th~ time of t~t~tive subdivision
review. {P&T)
87S170
In Mat~aoa Magisterial District~ GEP~ER C~ILDREN'S CENTER
requested ~mendment to Conditional Use ~tanned DevelopmeDt
(Case ~4SOSl) to permi~ a day care center in an Office Business
(0) District plus exception to parking requirements. This re-
quest lies on a 1.0 acre parcel fronting approximately 2~0 feet
on the ~outh line of Centralia Road, approximately 150 feet
cast of Nott Lane. Tax Map 96-9 (1) Part Of Parcel 6 (shept
31).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Co~%mission reoo~z~e~ded
approval of this requmst, ~u~jec~ ~o certain conditions,
present and stated that he under~tood th~ condition~ were
acceptable to ~he applicant, · When a~ked~ Mr. Jacobsen
indicated the applicant, who was nO% presmnt, 'had accep~e~ the
race--ended conditions at th~ Planning Co~ission meeting.
On motion of Mr. May~ seuonded by ~r. Daniel, th~ Board
approved Case 87S17O, subject to the fo!lowing conditions:
1. The following conditions notwithstanding, t~e plan pre-
19~7, shall be considered the ~as~er Plan. (P)
2. The existing fifteen {15) foot buffer along the w~tern
88-63
property boundary shall be maintained. There shall be no
fencing or play area located within this buffer. (P)
3. In conjunction with site plan review, a conceptual pedes-
trian access plan for the entire Office Business (O) tract
shall be submitted to the Planning Department ior review
and approval. This plan shall provide for access between
the existing shoppin9 center site to the west and the
existing residential development to the east. A detailed
plan for any portion of the pedestrian access provided on
the subject site shall be submitted for review and ap-
proval prior to release of any building permits for the
subject site. (P)
(Note: This condition is in addition to Condition 14 of
Case 84S082.)
4. In conjunction with the approval of this request, an
exception to the required number of parking spaces shall
be granted. Specifically, parking shall be provided based
upon the following ratio: one (1) space for each twenty
(20) children enrolled up to a maximum of six (6) spaces
plus one (1) space for each 'employee. Furthermore, an
area for drop-off and pick-up, which is separated from the
main parking area and connected to the main building by a
sidewalk, shall be provided to preclude the need for
children to cross the driveway. (P)
5. In conjunction with final site plan submission, a detailed
landscaping plan for buffers and pazking areas, per eon-
ditions of Case 84S082, shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for approval. (P)
(Note: Ail previously imposed conditions of Case 84S082,
with the exception of Textual Statement III, Tract B, 1.
Offices relative to permitted uses, and Condition 14
relative to pedestrian access, shall apply.)
Vote: Unanimous
87S173
In Matoaca Magisterial District, PI~RCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
INC. requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential
(R-9). A single family residential subdivision is planned.
This request lies on a 16.0 acre parcel fronting approximately
620 feet on the south line of Branders Bridge Road, across iron]
Wetdon Street. Tax Map 175-10 (1) Parcels 1, 2, and 3 (Sheet
49).
Mr. Jac0bson stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to a single condition.
Mr. David Staybauqh, representing the applicant, stated the
recommended condition was acceptable. When asked, he stated
public water and sewer would be used for this site.
Ms. Ruth Colston, an adjacent property 'owner, stated Colonial
Memorial Gardens Cemetery is lobated on the subject property
and requested the rezoning not be approved until the remaining
bodies in the cemetery are exhumed and properly relocated.
Mr. Mayes expressed concern that the developer contact Ms.
Celeron or the appropriate persons regarding the cemetery and
relocation of the graves. When asked, Mr. Micas indicated the
applicant must comply wit/n State regulations regarding the
proper disposition of any remains in the cemetery.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
deferred consideration of Case 87S173 until February 24, 1988.
88-64
B7S176
In Matosca Magisterial District, C~T~I~LD COUNTY BOARD
SU~KViSORS requested amendment to Conditional Use (Cas~
87SI17) relative to hours of operation. This request lies in an
Agricultural (A) District on a 4.5 acre parcel fronting approxi-
mately 566 feet on the south line of Beach Road, approximately
198 feat wast or Winterpock Road. Tax Map 109-1 (1) Parcel 18
(Sheet 29).
Mr, Jacobsen s~a~ed the Plan~inq Cen~ission recommended denial
o2 amendment to Conditional Uae (Case 87Sl17) relative to the
hour~ of operation for gu outdoor recreational 2acillty and
community center in an Agricultural (A) Di~trlct to allow
Opera,ion un~il 11:00 p.m. instead o~ the previously imposed
limitation of 10:30 p.m. on c~rtain days. H~ stated staff
reco~endad that should the Commission and Board wish to
approve this reque~t~ it may be appropriate to further regulate
the time at which lights should b~ turned off and that s~ch
approval require imposition of certain conditions.
Ms. Ca~Otyn Southard, representing the Winterpock Recreation
Association, stated tho lI:0O p.m. l~mitat~on for the hour~ of
operation ~n~ acceptable end that ali outdoor lighting would be
turned off at approximately 11:15 p.m.
Mr, and Mrs. Baker, adjacent property owners, requ~zt~d that
th~ 10:30 p.m. limitation b~ melntalned for ending reeves=tonal
aotiuities.
There was a brief discussion relative to tb~ hours of
operation, th~ requirement that outdoor lighting be turned elf
no moro than fifteen (15} minutes after permitted hours cf
operation, etc.
Mr. Mayes stated there had b~en much discussion regarding t~lis
request with legitimate concerns from all those involv~.
~tat~d, although neither the applicants nor the adjacent
neiqhbor~ were completel~ satisfied, he felt the '11~00 p.m.
closing hour wes a satisfactory oompre~iee and the intent cf
his motion would be to ensure that the outdoor lighting be
turned off at ll:O0 p.m.
On motion of Mr. ~eye~, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved Case 87S176, subject to the following
1. HOurS of operation shall be limited to between $:Q0 a.m.
and 11:00 p.m., Sunday through Saturday a~cept the
Winterpo~k Recreation AssociatloD may have stew cooks
within the'cor~unlty building other then hours specified.
The community building shall otherwise be subject to hours
o£ opera=ion as restricted heroin.
(~ote: This condition super~edee Condition 2 of
87S117.)
2. All outdoor lighting ~hall be aime~ and shielded so as to
minimize predict±on of light into adjacent properties.
With exception of ~eurity lighting, all outdoor lighting
shall be turned off no later than 11:00 p.m.
(Note: This condition ~upeTsed~s Condition 6 of Case
87Sl17.)
88-65
87S177
In Matoaca Magisterial District, FRIEDA SNYDER requested
resoninq from Convenience Business (B-l) to General ~usiness
(B-3) on a 1.5 acre parcel fronting approximately 150 feet on the
south line of Hull Street Road, approximately 708 feet west of
Baldwin Creek Road. Tax Map 73 (1) Part of Parcel 54 (Sheet 19).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this request and acceptance of the proffered
conditions.
There was no one present to represent the request. Mr.
Jacobsen indicated the recommendation was acceptable to the
applicant at the January 19, 1988 Pianning Commission meeting.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seeonded by Mr. Currin, the Board
approved Case 87S177 and accepted the following proffered
condition:
The entire property shall conform with the Corridor
Overlay District Standards, except that the ten (10) acre
minimum acreage requirement for all uses permitted in the
General ~u$1ness (~-3) District shall not apDly.
Vote: Unanimous
87S178
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, CONTEL CELLULAR OF
RICHMOND, INC. requested Conditional Use Planned Development to
permit a 185 foot radio tower in General Business (B-3) and
Residential (R-7) Districts. This request lies on a 0.8 acre
parcel fronting approximately fifteen (15) feet on the west line
of South Providence Road, approximately 500 feet south of
Midlothian Turnpike. Tax Map 28-3 (1) Part of Parcel 18 (Sheet
8).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to certain conditions and
acceptance of proffered conditions as noted in the addendum.
Mr. Gary Patterson, representing the applicant, presented a
brief overview of the request and stated the recommended
conditions were acceptable.
Mr. Mayes excused hi/Qself from the' meeting to attend the Crater
Planning District Commission (CPDC) meeting.
Mrs. Roselle Shutte, Mr. Watkins Eamlett, Mr. Alan Martin, Mr.
C.C. Ramsey, Mr. Edward Doube~ly, Mr. Steve Meadows, Mr. Doug
Shutte and Mr. Michael Antonellini voiced opposition to the
proposed request and expressed concerns relative to the impact
of the tower on the aesthetics of the neighborhood,
depreciation of property values, potential safety hazards for
neighborhood children, low altitude air traffic, pedestrian
traffic to and from site for maintenance purposes, etc.
Petitions w=re also submitted to the Board for consideration.
Nr. Applegate noted, for the record, letters from residents in
Opposition to the request who could not attend the meeting.
~r. Robert Dolbeare, attorney for Poppell Toyota, noted his
client's concerns relative to drainage from the subject site.
Mr. Dale Woolsey of Contel Cellular presented technical data
relevant to the proposed use and addressed those concerns
expressed by area residents.
88-66
Mr. Sullivan stated he undermtcod why there was opposition to
the installation of a tower in a residential neiqhborhood;
howevert given the alternative uses available for the General
Bnsine~ (B-3) District that could be approved for the site, he
felt the proposed use was the best of the choices. He
suggested sonsideration bo given to removal of the tower if and
when Contel accepts the use of ~at~llite technology. He
the need ~or this type service is important and necessary far
~m~rg~ncy ~ituations, handicapped residents in %he County,
etc.~ and he supported the request.
tower be removed at the ~ime Contel accepted the use of
eatellite technology. He stated he under~tood and sympathized
with area residsnts~ however, he felt the proposed use is
appropriate and Would support the request.
MC. C~rrin e~preuSed concerns relative to the height of the
tower, adequate buffering/landscaping requirements for the
site, aesthetic impact on the neighborhood, etc. Ne stated he
did not waut to do anything to retar~ commercial davelepment in
the County but neither would he want a tower adjacent to him
property and he could not support the proposed request.
Mr. Applegate stated hs had visited other tower sitee and~ when
informed that this reques~ wa~ for a tower twice as high as
others in th~ County, ke could not vi~ualize one in this area
being appropriate. ~ =tared also that he was concerned with
safety factors and, although this project involved high
t~chnology and adequate precaUtiOnS ha~ been taken, there have
been instances where major disasters kava occurred as a result
unanticipated problems. 5e s~ated he did not want to do
anythinq to retard eke development of bus,messes in the County,
however, after ~iscussing other permitted ~-3 uses :hat could
bm approved for the site ~ith the residents and havin~ been
told that they preferred a building contractor, cons. traction
yard, er bowling alley to a tower, he could not support
reques%. ~e stated a ~tu~y of %he county for appr0priat~ sit~
locations for Such requests Dhould be reviewed more thoroughly.
On motion of ~r. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board
denied case
Ayes: Mr. Applegat~ and Mr. Cuttle.
Nays: Mr. ~ullivan.
Abstention: Mr. Daniel.
On motion of Mr. Hani~l, seconded b~ Mr. Sullivan, the Board
adjourned at 7;15 p,m. {~$T] until February t0, 19~8, at 9:00
Virginia, Inc. at ~agnelia Grange i~ediately foll0wing this
meeting.)
County Administrator
88-67
Chairman