Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
06-13-1973 Packet
'It FOR OFF S c E U SE ONLY • of Supervisors Case No . %�j SO Sof' 7 �( ';2 (a (az _rd o£ Zorning Appeals Fee Receipt No _ • -73 : c_ ;K ar �r ae x -x it �r m at ar -* -m a. 4r m :t r- it ar it Tii" it TION TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OR Pt, ti 1,�gg ��c f+<<p c�tiucY <�, BOARD OF ZON2NG APPEALS 'mss cH5llAt�i7[9L LE�2�NG TNFORMATTON SHALL Bim. TYPED OR PRTNTID AND COMPLETED SN FULL X . EXP LA 2 N FULLY THE REQUEST DE S T RED A3 REZONTNG : From A GR ICULTURAL ( A ) To MOB i LsVI HOME S/D ( MH2 ) Type O£ use ( $ proposed : Moa 1 Le HOME Suop i V 1 S i ON B) C OND S T S ONAL U S E C ) VAR S AN C E : D) S P EC T AL EXCEPT 2 ON at at •t at at at 9t iF # dt i4 it 2_ A) NAME OF ADPL=CANT' VANOE—BARKER �PARTNERSH IP) B) MATLTNG ADDRESS: VA - E N 1::) ) NAME OF PRESENT OWNER OF PROPERTY ON WH T C H THS S R EQUE ST WILL OCCUR: SAME M) MA 2 L= NG ADDRESS : .SAME F TEL PHONE NO G ) NAME OF PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED SF OTHER THAN A PPL 2 C ANT A ND OR P RO PERTY OWNER - H ) ADDRESS - T TE LE P HONE NO _ at ►t w at at at at �t at at et �t 3_ TF THE A P P L T C A NT XS NOT THE OWNER OF THE P RO PERTY TN QUESTION. E X PLAIN : ( A C o p y or p e nd i n g c on t r a c t or op t i o n a gre eme n t s Yea 1 1 b e a t t a c h ed I -3e r e t o and made a part; or t h i s a p p l i c at ion .) i � * m a a d M it I a 9F LO C A T S ON OF PROPERTY TN QUESTION (F o 1 1 ow i ng i n£ orma t i o n s ha 1 1 b e o b t a i n e d £r om t he Oi'Y Ice o£ the County Assessor , Room 2-L3) 4 _ A) MAGISTERIAL DTSTRTCT F3 -11.O B ) TAX MAP NO C ) SEC . NO. D ) SU BD TV T S T O N NO---- E ) BLOCK NO. F) LOT OR P ARCS L NO . 2 G) STREET A DDRE S S H) SOUR C E OF T T TLE FOR ALL R O PERT T E S T NVO LVED DE E BOO PAGE 5. STATE THE REASON FOR THIS REQUEST: %HE PROPERTY IS CUT UP CONSIDERABLY BY VFPCO TRANSMISSION LINE AND RAILROAD RICHT-OF-WAYS WHERE MOST SUITABLE SOIL EXISTS$ AND WE vE THIS TO BE THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE. # # # # # # # # # # # 6. STATE HOW THIS REQUEST WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS OR THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD: THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD IS MOSTLY UNDEVELOPED AND THE EXISTING HOUSES IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA VIRY WIDELY IN SET—BACK, PRICE RANGE AND 7E . THIS WILL 8E A WELL—PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 7. EXPLAIN ANY EXISTING USE PERMIT, SPECIAL EXCEPTION, CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE GRANTED PREVIOUSLY ON THE PARCEL IN QUESTION: r.Inma 8. A) EXISTING LAND USE(S): VACANT LAND B) EXISTING STRUCTURE(S): SHACK TYPE USE: RccInFNTIAI - C) EXISTING ZONING: AGR ICULTURAL D) TOTAL ACREAGE OF THE REQUEST: ACRES # # # # # # # # # # # 9. GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT, ACROSS THE ROAD OR HIGHWAY AND FACING THE PROPERTY AND ANY OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM SUCH PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY AFFECTED IS SITUATED AT OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY TWO OR MORE ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEED OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY ROAD OR HIGHWAY WITH A RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OR AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS OF ANY TWO RAILROADS, GIVE NAMES OF PROPERTY OWNERS AT ALL CORNERS OF ANY SUCH INTERSECTION. (Following information MUST BE obtained by the applicant from the office of the County Assessor, Room 213). A) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: H E R! E R T T. KING MAILING ADDRESS: RT. ( COLONIAL HEIGHTS., VA. 23734 TAX MAP NO.: 134-2 Il SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: I BLOCK: SECTION:_ B) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: NICHOLAS N. JONES, ET AL ELLA J. ,SAINES ,UNION ,ALL -IT., AMAICA, N.Y. MAILING ADDRESS: 71 L TAX MAP NO.: 13 -7 1 SUBD . NAME: 3 LOT or PARCEL C, BLOCK: SECTION: C) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MA PY F. MAILING ADDRESS: MR s • C TAX MAP NO.: t3 _ 1 ( 1 ) LOT or PARCEL: I!� BLOCK: MCWILLiAMS �ERALOiNE (NG, 11 5U SECTION: D) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: S H I R L E Y A. 'off I L L I A M s MAILING ADDRESS: RT. 3, L1Ox RESTER, TAX MAP NO.: 134-1 (I 7 SUBD . NAME: LOT or PARCEL: 17 BLOCK: SECTION: -2- KWY. t AMPT9L�1,,f', r E) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: F. M. �4 A S H A B A u G H J rR . MAILING ADDRESS: RT. I, Box 137, COLONIAL HEIGHTS, VA. 23 3 TAX MAP NO.: 14-2 ( 1) SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL --.------3 BLOCK: SECTION: F) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: LESLIE R OWLET T MAILING ADDRESS: 2725 KINGSDALE RD., RICHMOND, VA. TAX MAP NO.: 15��-� (I ) SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: 3 3L SECTION: G) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: WILLIAM G. —YOUNG MAILING ADDRESS: 16,_--42 12 TH AVE.,JAMAICA,N.Y TAX MAP NO.: 134 -6 I SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: H) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: I) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: J) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: K) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: _ SECTION: L) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX M,%P NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: M) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: N) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: _ BLOCK: SECTION: FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE USE THE BACK OF PAGES 2 & 3 -3- 10) THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE FEE REQUIRED. A FEE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, ROOM 307. 11) CHECK OR MONEY ORDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO: TREASURER, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD 12) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION EITHER THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY TAX MAP OR A SURVEYED PLAT OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL. 13) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION ANY PERTINENT SITE PLANS OR TENTATIVE PLATS. NOTE: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS MAY DELAY THE SCHEDULING OF REQUESTS. 14) I/WE HEREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ANY EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE: ✓] 197 3 elm - SIGNATURE 0 (Name of person other tha but acting for the applicant, filling out all or a part of this appli- cation) OF APPLICANT (Same name as used in Item 2-A, Page 1) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS+DAY O4-' 197-• MY COMMISSION EXPIRES . CV,':t : �?-_______, 191 Aw NOTARY -4- ill 1 VIRGINIA: At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, held at the Courthouse on June 139 1973 at 9:00 A.M. Present: Mr, Irvin G.Horner, Chairman Mr, Leo Myers, Vice -Chairman Mr.J.Ruffin Apperson Mr. A. J.Krepela Nir. E.Merlin O'Neill Mr. Burnett gives the invocation. Also Present: Mr. Oliver D. Rudy, Comm. AttY. Nir, Morris Mason,Asst. Comm. tty• Mr. Ni.W.Burnett, Co. Admin. Mr. C.G.Manuel,Asst. Co. Admin. Mr. Robt. A.Painter, Co. Eng. Nir, James R. Condrey,Dir.Central Accounting Mr, Michael Ritz, Co.Planner On motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Mr.Myersg itis resolved that the minutes of May 23 be and they hereby are app Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr.Horner, seconded by Mr.Krepela, it is resolved that the resolution dated February 4bel973 and itanting herebyaisVariance rescinded.two (2) lots at the end of Crostic Road Ayes: Mr.Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Horner, seconded by 1`1r..Myers, it is resolved that a Variance be granted to Mr. Gerald F. Highsmoth to allow the construction of a dwelling on a parcel of land approximately 165 feet west of the center line of Crostic Road, provided a 25 -ft, strip be gr Mr. nted Mr. Highsmith and a 50 -ft. right-of-way be granted by Mr. and also a 25 -ft. strip of land from the center of Crostic Road be given by Mr. Crostic all according to the plat recorded with the papers of this Board, with the understanding that the County has no obligation to construct or maintain the roads leading to this piece of land. . Apperson, Mr+ Krepela and Mr.G'Neill. Ayes: Mr, Horner, Mr. Myers, Nir �1✓ Gn motion of P;.r. Payers, seconded by "'Ir.Apperson, it is resolved that resolution on Sewer Bonds be and it hereby is adopted (Copy resolution into permanent record in Minute Book). A poll of the Board being taken the following vote is recorded: Ayes: Mr. Horner, Fire Myers, Mr. Appersoni Mr.Krepela and 11Ir.Oli�eill. On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that the following ordinance be and it hereby is adopted: AN ORDINANCE to vacate a 60 -foot street in Bon Airg a plat of which entitled "Map of 4.071 Acres of land situated on the southern line of Chesterfield Avenue between Buford and Pavilion Streets, Chesterfield County, Virginia', made by Chas. H. Fleet & Associates,Civil Engineer, and Surveyors dated January 16 1956, recorded February 39 1956, in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County,Virginia, in Deed Book 491, at page 333, the said 60 -foot street being unimproved and not used for public purposes and being more particularly shown on the portion of the aforesaid plat, dated January 16, 1956, shaded in red and designated as "McRae Street", a copy of which plat is attached hereto and made a part hereof of this referennce. WHEREAS, Joellyn T. Duesberry and 1,. Reginal Duesberryj her husband, have petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, to vacate the 60 -foot wide unimproved street as shown shaded in red and designated as -,;McRae Street" on the aforesaid plat:, a copy of which is attached to and made a part hereof by this reference. WHEREAS notice of the adoption of this ordinance has been given in accordance with Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1850,as amended. NO: , THEREFOR;! BE IT ORDAINED 6y the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia: 1. That pursuant to Section 15.1-482, of the Code of Virginia, 1950,as amended, that the unimproved 60 -foot street described above and shown shaded in red and designated as ',McRae Street" on the afore- said plat, be and it is hereby vacated. 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accordance with Section 15.1-482 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and a Certified Copy thereof together with the plat attached shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia. Ayes: Mr,Horner, Mr, Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. The matter of pay increased to be effective June 1, 1973 comes begofe the Board and after much discussion of this matter, it is on motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by i°1r.Apperson, resolved that the salary increases established and approved for the 1973-74 budget are hereby approved and extended to become effective June 1, 1973 and $73,313.00 is hereby apy]ropriated from various unappropriated surplusor fund balances as follows: -2- 14 Fund Fund 11 - Library Fund 13 Y Fund Fund 17 - County Garate Fund 21 - ';, elf are Fund 22 - Nursing Home Fund 31 - LttriCk Sanitary District Fund 41 - School Operating Fund 61 - Water Operating Fund 63 - Water Impr.Repl.&Ext. Fund 66 - .,vater i�ieter installation Fund 71 - Sewer Operating Fund 73 - Sewer Impr.Rep.& Ext. $141394.00 1,700.00 370.00 1,500.00 1,000.00 32.00 49,805.00 1,565.00 494.00 679.00 988.00 686.00 $73,313.00 Ayes: Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, rir.Krepela and mr.O'Neill. Nays: Mr. `corner Mr. Jack Loftus speaking for the Southampton Sewer Association, comes before the Board and states agreement80andf the askedy14 whenatheles in the area have signed sewer County will instAll sewOrs in the area. Mr. Painter states that the previous plans call for advertising the bids on July 22nd and to award the bids on August 22nd. Nr. Loftus stated that this was satisfactory. On motion of l'-ir. Apperson, seconded by lir. Myers, it is resolved that the Highway Department be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System of roads, Crossvine Road in the subdivision of Centralia Gardens. The County was notified that the following additions and deletions to the Secondary System have been officially accomplished: Addition: Sections 3 and 4 of new location Route 603 from Station 99 + 00 to Powhatan County line, project 0.20 Mi. 0603-020-155, C501; 156,B640 Abandonment Sections 1 and 2 of old location Route 603 from Station 99 + 00 to Powhatan County line, project0.20 " 0603-020-155, C501; 156,B640 Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Vir.Krepela and Nir.O'Neill —3— There was presented a cop of the Richmond Metropolitan Authority budget for the year 1973-74 which is filed with the papers of this Board. Mr. E.L.Covington, Resident Engineer, Virginia Department of Highways, was quesed thatnthisomatternwashundertinvestigationsign at ewithf the owners l and h ownersof the stated ed Shopping Center. The request for a speed limit sign on Stella Road, a request by Nir.J.R.tippelman was discussed and Fir. Covington stated that this matter is under investigation. The County Administrator explains the drainage program in the Bellwood Manor area and the scope of the project proposed which calls for the expenditure in excess of $100,000 of non -County money, provided easements can be secured. It was cited the problems of acquiring an easement across the lands of Mr. Louis Reynolds and it appears at this time that this easement will have to be condemned. Mr. Flyers states that he has sold his roperty in the area to the Preston Trucking Company and has no interest in the matter at this time but does wish to disclose his previous interest in this matter. Cn motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Pir. Apperson, it is resolved that due to the emergency of getting this program underway, due to the benefits that will accrue to the homes in Bellwood Nianor that the easement across the land belonging to mr. Lpuis Reynolds be condemned if said easement proves to be necessary in this program. Ayes: I11r.Horner, Mr. iiyers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Nir. O'Neill. Mr. Appdrson again brings up the problem of the narrow bridge on Beulah road at Kingsland Creek. rammed at this Mr. `�ovington states that this project is being programmed time. Mr. Covington advises the Board that a resolution passed on April 119 1973 concerning the right-of-way west of Rt.671 in the amount of $2500.00 from the 3T Road Fund of the County, also included a request to take said road into the Secondary System as a Rural Road and states further that this cannot be done at this time because of the small number of homes and the excessive amount of money necessary to bring this right-of-way up to acceptable standards. On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr.Niyers, it is resolved that the resolution of April 11, 1973 -be rescinded and that the Highway Department be requested to improve this right-of-way at a cost not to exceed $2500.00, to be paid from the 3(r Road Fund of the County. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Nir .O'Neill. -4- M On motion of Mr. Myers, seconded a sewer connection be allowed for intersection of Rts. 1 and 10. *1004 by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that a Bank to be constructed at the Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Nr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. Mr. Graham Jennings, Attorney, for the owner of E1 Rancho Trailer Court comes before the Board requesting some decision on his client s request to connect this Trailer Court to the County's sewer system. Mr. Painter states that the entire cost of eliminating the Buford lagoon and connecting the Trailer Court would be $96,000. Fir. Jennings states that his client would pay $40,000, plus some connection charges for new trailers if allowed. On motion of Mr.Krepela, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that the County Engineer investigate this matter more thoroughly and that action on this matter would be deferred to June 277 1973. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Krepela. The Leaf Burning Ordinance was advertised twice in the Richmond Times - Dispatch for hearing at this time. Mr. Mason R. Hayes states that he has too many trees in his yard for him to rake up the leaves, that this encourages the desctruction of trees because of the leaves, that trees purify the air far more than burning the leaves polluted the air and all of his neighbors wanted to burn leaves at certain times during the year. Mr. Robert Stewart states that he and Mr. Wagstaff spent about two weeks lobbying for the Leaf Burning Act in the General 1,ssembly and there was no real problem until this past year when people left their leaves in drainage ditches or on vacant land which created all kinds of hazards. Mrs. Elizabeth Hodgins presents a petition signed by some 250 people requesting the Board to pass the Ordinance. is not ly truckisaandjaindustrysandathatashe doesgnot wantntorrakestwodcars, acres o-- lawn. Mr. Sam Wagstaff states that the collection of leaves all over the County will cost the taxpayers a lot of money. Mrs. L.E.Armstrong, Chesterfield's Chairman of the League of Women Voters, speaks against the passage of the Leaf Putrning Ordinance, stating in general that the County should pick up the leaves saving the pollution of the air. Mr. Robert Ellyson, representing the Richmond Area T. B. and Respiratory Disease Associstion, states that the County should pick up the leaves or citizens should compost. Mrs. George Auclair speaks against the passage of the Ordinance stating that she wants clean air. -5- �# Nr. Herbert Holden speaks of his concern due to the safetyfacter or since at times the smoke from burning leaves may impair prop distance. Of those citizens present, 30 stand in favor of passing the Ordinance, 11 stand against the passage of the Grdinance, Mr. Apperson states that most of our problems stemmed from trthag to burn leaves in a ditch with no air and agreed with Mr. people may cut down trees to avoid hem the ein bleaves if they were forced to rake up the leaves an p ut Elderly people find it hard to keep the lawns clear of leaves, [!dater courses and drainage ditches all over the County have been choked by leaves and he states that he believes the burning of leaves is the only way Out- /1 the Midlothian are isthe1most sensitive " Mr. Krepela states thatw/�� �OA-C. .' this problem's..-Z���� , tyers `�to 1Mr. stmt°� that his telephonerun 0 irfavor of t 1e Ordinance. Mr. OtNeill speaks in favor of the Ordinance. Mr Rudy states that the proposedBo ordinance is more restrictive than the State Air Poll mr.Horner says the success depends on the discretion of the County ci?ti.zens and urges all citizens to view the matter seriously and to burn leaves properly, On motion of Mr. 1- 1pperson,seconded by 1`r.Myers, it is resolved tlYa: t:�e following Ordinance be and it hereby is adopted: AN ORDINANCE to amend and reordain Chapter 31 Article III, of Chesterfield, Virginia, by addingohibrt �tr the Code or the County of lour new sections, Section 3-20 3-21 3-22 and 3-23, to p the open burning of leaves fromtrees�durinq certain periods of when he year and within certain hours of the Say; to prohibit burning d to establish penalties leaf pick-up service is made available; an for violation thereof. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD CF SUPERVISORS CF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1. That Chapter 37 Article III, of the Code of tthe f o aunty of Chesterf field, Virginia, be amended by adding theresections, Section 3-20, 3-217 3-22 and 3-230 to read as follows: Section 3-20. Burning of leaves; when prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to burn leafres in the open during the period beginning December16 and n16nandctober endingl5 of Marcha15 ofar, and during the period g any year; except, however, that for a period of 30 days commencing with the effective date of this ordinance open burning of leaves shall be permitted. IM. M M Section 3-21. Burnin of leaves; when allowed. (a) It shall be lawful for persons to burn leaves from trees on property where they reside during the period beginning October 16 and ending December 15 of any year, and during the period beginning March 16 and ending Pray 15 of any year, (b) Provided, however, tnat during such letter period (March 16 to May 15) such burning will be unlawful if it occurs within three hundred feet of any woodland or brushland unless it takes place between the hours of four o'clock post meridian and twelve o'clock midnight. Section 3-22. Burning of leaves prohibited when pick-up service available (a) udithin the bounds of any area designated by the Board of Supervisors and duly proclaimed by said Board as an area in which a county leaf pick-up service shall be provided by said Board on a once -a -week basis during the periods when leaf burning under Section 3-21 above would be otherwise permitted, it shall be unlawful to burn leaves at army time. (b) In the event the Board o Supervisors shall choose to make the pick-up service mentioned in paragraph (a) above available it a designated area, it shall do so by describing said area by metes and bounds in a notice published once a week for two successive weeks in a newspaper having general circulation in said area and by posting said notice in at least five (5) public places within the area so designated. Section 3-23,, Penalties. Any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be liable to a fine of not more than five hundred dollars for each violation. This ordinance shall be and become in full force and effect upon its passage as provided by law. Ayes: T-ir. Horner, Mr, Myers, Mr. App.rson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. The Ordinance re -arranging the boundaries of the Bon Air Precinct and Crestwood Precinct in the Midlothian T�iagisterial District was advertised according to law for a hearing on this date: AN ORDINANCE to provide for the rearrangement of the boundaries of Bon Air Precinct in Midlothian Magisterial District and Crestwood Precinct in Midlothian Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, by dividing the existing Bon Air and Crestwood Precincts and creating a new voting precinct to be known as the Huguenot Precinct so that the boundaries of the precincts coincide with the existing boundaries of the United States Congressional Districts and the Commonwealth of Virginia Senatorial Districts, and to rearrange the boundaries of Wagstaff Circle Precinct, in Clover Hill -7- Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia; by creating a new voting precinct to be known as Shenandoah Precinct i.n order to conform Wagstaff Circle Precinct and the newly created Shenandoah Precinct with the existing boundary lines of the United States Congressional District lines and the Commonwealth of Virginia Senatorial District lines; and to establish the voting places at all of the newly arranged voting precincts in Chesterfield County, Virginia. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BC.`I.RD OF SUPERVI.�ORS OF THE CCUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA: 1. Pursuant to authority contained in the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, Sdctions 24.1-37 and 24.1-392 the Bon Air Election District, the Crestwood Election District and the Huguenot Election District, all in the Midlothian Magisterial District of Chesterfield County, Virginia, and the Wagstaff Circle Election District and Shenandoah Election District in the Clover Hill Magisterial District of Chesterfield County, Virginia, and the respective polling places in each Election District are created and established as set forth in this ordinance. BON_ AIR VOTING PR;�CINCT� Beginning at the intersection of the center lane of the Southern Railway with the boundary line between Chesterfield County and the City of Richmond; thence northwardly and westwardly main along said boundary line to its intersection with the center line of Huguenot Load (State Road No.147); thence westwardly along the center line of Huguenot Road to its intersection with the Southern Railway; thence eastwardly along the center line of the Southern Railway to the point of beginning. The voting place therein is to be at Bon Air Community House. CREST;jCOD VCTIN _ PRECINCT Beginning at the intersection of the center line of U.S. Route No.60 with the boundary line between Chesterfield County and the City of Richmond; thence northwardly and westwardly along said boundary line to its intersection with the Southern Railway; thence westwardly along the center line of the Southern Railway to its intersection with Buford Road (County Route No.67B); thence southwardly along the center line of Buford Road to its intersection with U.S.Route No.60; thence eastwardly along the center line of U.S.Route No. 60 to the point of beginning. The voting place therein is to be at Crestwood Elementary School. IM M M HUGUENOT VOTING PRECINCT-: Beginning at the intersection of U.S.Route No.60 and Buford Road (County Route No.678); thence in a northerly direction alone the center line of Buford Road to its intersection with the Southern Railway; thence westwardly along the center line of the South�.rn Railway to its inter- section with State Route: No. 147; thence westwardly and southwardly along the center line of State Route No.147 to its intersection with TJ.S.Route No.60sthence along the center line of U.S.Route No.60 to the point of beginning. The voting place therein is to be at Brighton Green Commdnity Center. SHENANDOAH VOTING PRECINCT: Beginning at thee centerlineofS.ArchRoad;thence intersection of Reams Road with the in a northerly direction along the center line of South Arch Road continuing into the center line of North Arch Road to the intersection of U.S.Route No.60; thence westwardly along the center line of U.S.Route x,,0.60 to the intersection of Courthouse i<oad; thence southwardly along the center line of Courthouse Road to the intersection of Reams Road and easterly along the center line of Reams Road to the point of beginning. The voting place therein is to be at Shenandoah Community Center. WAGSTAFF CIRCLE_ VOTING PRECINCT:_ + Beginning at the intersection of the center line of Courthouse road with the center line of U.S. Route No. 360; thence northwardly along the: center line of Courthouse Road to its intersection with the center line of Reams Road;thence eastwardly alone the center line of Rearns Road; thence eastwardly along the center line of Reams Road to its inter- section with the center line of South Arch Road; thence to a northerly direction along the center line of South Arch Road continuing into the center line of North :=arch Road to its intersection with the center line of U.S.Route No.60; , thence eastwardly alone the center line of U.S. Route 60 to its intersection with the boundary line between Chesterfield County and the City of Richmond; thence southwardly along said boundary line to its intersection with the center line of U.S. Route No. 360; thence westwardly along the center line of U.S. Route No. 360 to the poin.- of beginning. The voting place therein is to be at Providence Junior High School. 2. The secretary of the Electoral Board shall notify, by mail, not later than fifteen (15) days prior to the next general,special -9- or primary election, all registered voters whose precinct and/or polling place has been changed by the provision of this ordinance. 3. Should any section or provision of this ordinance be decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section or provision of this ordinance. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its adoption and enactment by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that the Ordinance for changing the Chester Precinct be advertised for a public hearing at a later date. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, i�,ir. Apperson, Mr. Krapela and Nir.U�Neill. Mr. Krepela asked that a resolution establishing a bird sanctuary in the Village of Fiidlothian be deferred to June 27, 1973. Mr_. Myers asked that a Variance request of Mr. tvflittle on Lafayette Avenue be deferred to June 327, 1973. 72-119C On motion of Mr.I`i ers, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that the request for withdrawal of the Castle Park Systems, Inc. for a Mobile Home Park on the N eadowville Road, be, and it hereby is accepted. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson aid Pair. Krepela. 73-5059 Mr. Sam Barker comes before the Board requesting the rezoning from A§ricultural (A) to Residential (R-2) of a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 30.75 acres, fronting mn the north approximately 1200 ft. on Rt.6201 also fronting on the south approximately 2400 ft. on Ramblewood Drive (Rt. 617), and being located approximately 800 ft. east of the intersection of Lawng Drive and Route 620, in Bermuda Magisterial District. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 134-2 (1) parcel 2 and part of parcel 6 (Sheet No.42). Mr. Barker states that he proposes to develop the land as a subdivision. Mr. F. M. Washabaugh, Jr. questions the intent but does not oppose the request. Upon consideration whereof, and the Planning Commission having re- commended approval, it is on motion of Pre Myers, seconded by Mr. Krepela, resolved that the aforedescribed parcel of land be and it hereby is rezoned for R-2 purposes. Ayes: Mr. Horner, iVir. Myers, Mr. Apperson, 14r.Krepela and Fr. O'Neill. -10- M 735063 Mr. Paul Brewster, representing the Kayhoe Construction Company., comes before the Board on behalf of the rezoning request of 1,ir.J. Gilbert Ballrequesing the rezoning from Residential (R-2) to General Business (B-3) of a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 18.81 acres, fronting approximately 1000 feet on Iron Bridge Road (Rt. 10) ext nding northwestwardly to a depth of approximately 1000 feet, and being located approximately 200 feet northeast of the intersection of Iron Bridge Road and Canasta Drive in Dale Magisterial l:)isitrct. Refer to Tax Map Se, 66-1 (1) parcel 3 (Sheet No. Mr. Ball states that he wants a Use Permit to build a Nursing Home on 6 -acres of land fronting on Route 4-10, 400 ft. on the northern side of his property and that he will pump sewage until the sewer line comes to the area. On motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Mr. ;Tigers, it is resolved that this matter agE,in be deferred to June 27 at 2:00 P.M. Ayes: 1`'ir, Horner, T•'ir. Nmyers, Mr. Apperson, !ir.Krepela and k-1r.01Neill. 739073 Mr. 'John Moore, Attorney, comes before the Board representing the Lone Star Properties, Inc.requesting the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-2) and 'Townhouse for sale (R-7) two parcels of land of irregular shape, containing 304 acres, fronting approximately 150 ft. on Newby's Bridge Road (Rt.649), and being located approximately 1800 feet south of the intersection of Newby's Bridge Road and 14almsley Blvdq in Clover Hill Magisterial District. Refer to Tax Map Sec - 51 -1 (1) parcels 1 Ell 2 and 40-13 (1) parcel 8-1 (Sheet No. 15) . and presents txr. Kurk Amess an official of the Company, who states that it is their policy now to use all saleable land. N:r. David Bibner presents slides showing the effect of the proposed development on traffic, sewer and water and states further that 47 -acres will be dedic_ted to the county for park purposes; that 40% of the site will be single f,1mily9 30% will be Townhouses, and 30% will be vacant. He proposes cluster type homes in some cases, and a varied assortment of i'ownhouses hich ed Mr. David that the County ofpresented nChesterfieldnomical lmpact would makeyawpr.ofiptufrromtthis to show tha Y development. The County Administrator stated that he did not agree entirely with the findings of i•ir. nick but would go into the differences at another time. of�jadacentrproperty seaks in thatrA-7tating zoningthat he can be securedas - es Vaughan for this area also. Mr. Horner states that the roads in the area are questionable, that this land does not have to be multiple family and there are at least 30 -acres of non -usable land along the Creek. Mr. Ames and 1,ar. Bick state that they wish t© avoid any arrang ment other than Dome owners and would probably have clauses in the deeds against renting the `townhouses. On motion of 1,,1r. 1-:orn:er, seconded by Mr. Tiger ., it is resolved that this matter be deferr8d to July 25, 1973. Ayes: lir. Horner, Mr.Myers, 14r. Apperson,Mr.Krepela and 1Vir.0'Neill. -11- M 725074 n On motion of Mr. Myer# seconded by Mr. Appersong it is resolved that the request of the Day Realty of Richmond, Inc., be deferred to July 11, 1973. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Krepela. 73SO75 Mr.J. Gray Spain comes before the Board reqquesting the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to General Industrial (M-2) of a parcel of land of rectangular shape, containing 3.58 acres, fronting approximately 320 feet on Happy Hill Road (Rt. 619), extending westwardly to a depth of approximately 400 feet, and being located approximately 1700 feet northeast of the iitersection of Happy Hill Road and Jefferson Davis Highway (Rt. 1/301). Refer to Tax Map Sec. 163-3 (1) parcel 10 Sheet 49). Mr. Spain states that most of his work will be the servicing of trucks, 90% of which haul gasoline. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr.O�Neill�seconded by matter be deferred to June 27, Mr. Myers, it is resolved that this 1973. Mr. Fir. Horner, Fir. Myers, r. Apperson, NIr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. 73SO76 Mr. William Wood, Attorney for the DuPont Company, comes befoYi the Board requesting a Conditional Use to operate by-product gypsL'd outside storage on a part of two parcels of land of irregular shape, containing 485 acres, fronting approximately 2700 feet on Bellwood Road (Rt.656)1, and being located approximately 1 mile east of the Bellwood Road and Route I-9u7d(ljaBermuda alsiDtiRefer to Tax Map Sec. 6Sparcelland 68O(1)parcl2(Sheet23). Mr. Apperson states that since he is an employee of the DuPont Company he now withdraws from the Board for this case. Mr. Wood states that calcium phosphate or gypsum may be a marketable product at some future date abd wishes to store some on the 20 -acres of land owned by the DuPont Company. He states further, that the Health Department and the State Water Control Board have approved this proposal, that gypsum will not break down under reasonable conditions and that the 20 -acres will possibly be filled in five or six years. There appearing no one in opposition to this request and the Planning Commission having recommended approval, it is on motion of Mr.Myers, seconded by Mr. Krepela, resolved that a Conditional Use to operate an outside storage on the aforedescribed parcel of land be and it hereby is 6pproved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide an accurate account of the drainage situation showing existing drainage and the impact this project will have on the site and the surrounding area. The applicant shall submit such a plan to the County will provide for on and Engineering DepartmentThe lanhshall explain the methodsoff andsshow drainagedrdrainage control. plan -12- M R the facilities to be utilized in the hydraulic engineering of this project. This plan shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to the applicant beginning any storage operation. 2. The application shall submit a plan for erosion and sediment control by the County Engineering Department. Such a plan is to be comprised of vegetative and engineering practices (as outlined in the "Erosion and SedimentC+bntrol Technical Handbooks] published by the James River Soil and Water Conservation District) to be utilized as erosion and sediment control measures for the project. The plan shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to beginning any storage operation. 3. No waste other than gypsum shall be deposited. 4. The top surface shallbe covered with compacted soil upon completion of the filling of each cell. 5. The applicant shall establish background levels for calciym and sulfate and the runoff from the f -J_11 area and monitor the runoff for both constituents throughout the disposal operation. 6. All storage shall occur in no other area than that indicated on ;the composite map marked and dated 4/18/73 and submitted with the Conditional Use application. 7. The height of the gypsum storage shall not exceed the total height of the natural bluff adjacent to the storage area. 8. Within 1 year of the cessation of this storage operation the ground area shall be reclaimed sufficiently enough to permit natural growth. Ayes: N1r.Horner, 1,1r. Myers, Mr. Krepe.la and 111r. O'Neill. .735) 77 The Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County requests the following changes in the Zoning Districts Niaps of Chesterfield County: A. In Matoaca Magisterial District, establish a Zoning District boundary line along the east line of Lot 14, the alley easement between Lots 6 & 15, and the east line of Lot 6, in Block F, of Laurel Branch Farms. Refer to Tax Map 182-9 (3) Blk. 11 lots 6,7, 14 and 15. r B. In Matoaca Magisterial District rezone from B-2 community Business to B-3 General Business parcels known as Tax Map 181-12 (4) lots 169 19 and 19A and Tax Map 182-9 (2) lot 18. C. In Midlothian Magisterial District rezone from R-2 Residential to B-2 Community Business parcels known as Tax Map 15-12 (2)7 parcels 8, 8-11 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and that part of parcel 9 south of a line extended from the northeast corner of parcel 8 to the northwest corner of parcel 14. -13- *00 D. In Bermuda Magisterial District rezone from A -Agricultural to M-1 Light Industrial, a parcel known as Tax Map 116-12 (2) 5. E. In Matoaca Magisterial District rezone from B-2 Community Business to A -Agricultural part of a parcel known as Tax Map 181-1 (1) 5, F. In Matoaca Magisterial District rezone from A -Agricultural to B-2 Community Business a part of a parcel known as Tax Map 181-1 (1) 6 being 200 feet by 200 feet and including 5309 Hickory Road, G. In Midlothian Magisterial District rezone from R-1 Residential to B-1Conveni.ence Business a parcel known as Tax Map 10-2 (1) S. H. In Matoaca Magisterial District rezone from B-2 Community Business to B-3 General Business a part of a parcel known as 163-3 (1) 2. I. In Niatoaca Magist(_rial District rezone from A Agricultural to B-3 General Business, a parcel known as Tax Map 181-8 (1) 3-1 Mr. John Smith speaks on Item C of the Board's request and points out several ways in which this could be amended. Upon consideration whereof and on motion of Mr.Krepelat seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that Item C of this request be deferred to July 11, 1973. Upon further consideration whereof and on motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that all of the zoning changes requested in Case 73-77 be approved with the exception of Item C. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. 73078 Mr. Kenneth R. Snodgrass comes before the Board requesting a Use Permit to locate a Mobile Home at 2900 Kingsland Road. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that a Use Permit to allow a Mobile Home on this property be granted for a period of two (2) years. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr.Krepela. 735079 Mrs. Roland D. Stokes, Jr., comes before the Board requesting a Use Permit to park a Mobile Home on the property of James Carey for her daughter who is to be married soon. There appearing no one to oppose this request, it is on motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that a Use Permit to locate a ltitobile Home at 9920 Jean Drive be and it hereby is granted for a period of two (2) years. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Krepela. -14- On motion of Mr. Myers,seconded by Mr. Krepela, it is resolved that an ordinance of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, Chapter 17 of the Code of Chesterfield County, Virginia to add to Section 1 the following: 11 (66 ) Onc Mobile ome for an owner or operator of a business being conducted on the premises subject to a mobile home permit from the Board of Supervisors,' and to add to Section 21-1 the following: 11(24) Mobile Homes subject to a mobile home permit from the Board of Supervisors." Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. On motion of Fir. Myers, seconded by i-r.Krepela, it is resolved that the Ordinance to amend Chapter 17, Article X, Section 10-17 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia be amended to read as follows: SECTION 10-17. Common Areas and Ownership of Property. In the event common areas are provided which are not contained in lots or streets conveyed to individual owners said common areas shall be maintained by and be the sole responsibility of the developer -owner of the town- house development until such time as the developer -owner conveys such common area to a non-profit corporate owner whose members shall be all of the individual owners of townhouses in the townhouse development or to a non-profit council of co-owners as provided under Title 55-79.1 et seq of the Code of Virginia (1950)7 as amended (horizontal Property Act). Said land shall be conveyed to and be and be held by such non- profit corporate owner or such non-profit council of co-owners solely for recreational and parking purposes of the owners of the individual townhouse lots in such townhouse development. In the event of such conveyance by the development -owner to a non-profit corporate owner, deed restrictions and covenants, in form and substance satisfactory to the Commonwealth's Attorney of the County of Chesterf icld, Virginia, shall provide, among other things, that any assessments, charges and costs of the maintenance of such common areas shall constitute a pro - rata lien against the individual townhouse lots, inferior in lien and dignity only to taxes and bona fide duly recorded deeds of trust on each townhouse lot. An applicant, seeking to subject property to townhouse development under this article whose ownership or interest in the property is held by a valid lease, shall provide for an initial term of not less than five hundred (500) years in such lease. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage as provided by law. Ayes: Mr. Korner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr. Myers, the following resolution is adopted: -15- M an motion of Fir. Krepela, seconded by Mr. Myers, the following resolution is adopted: WHEREAS, several citizens maintaining the historical and Midlothian Village; and of Midlothian are interested in architectural uniqueness of the WHEREAS, these citizens have requested the County's help in maintaining this uniqueness, NOW, THEREFGRE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors requests the County Planning Commission and Planning Department to prepare the necessary information and ordinances to help maintain the historical and architectural uniqueness of Midlothian Village and that the Commission and Planning staff work with any interested citizens on this project. Apperson, Mr.Krepcla and Par. O'Neill. Ayes: lvir. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. On motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that the following water contracts be and they hereby are; approved: W73-37CD Physic Hill,Section 9°E" $10,949.70 .50 W73 -34D Chippenham Square Apts. , W73 -40D Pocoshock Townhouses,Phase II 51335.00 2,800.00 W73-35CD-1 Stigall Drive 840.00 W73-35CD-2 Moravia Drive Ayes: l',lr. Horner, Fir. Myers, Fir. Apperson and Mr.Krepela. On motion of Mr. NiyorstheeinsaadllationrafKwaterain1LyndalesW73-24Chat Project W73-23CD for the installation of water on Galena Avenue be awarded to the 3M Construction Company, who submitted the low bid in the amount of $31,132.60. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Flyers, and Mr. Krepela. On motion of Mr.Horner, seconded by lir. Myers, it is resolved that the following sewer contracts be and they hereby are approved: S73 -39D Pocoshock Townhouses, Phase II $159255.00 S73 -41D Nieadowdale, Section °LH" - 10,403.99 573-40D Courthouse Green, Section "B" 450102.90 950041.00 S73 -38D The Meadows 4$0547.00 S73 -4D Kingwood Ayes: Fir. Horner, Fir. Myers, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. ed On motion of Mr. s�as60�daydextenisior. ��on1Projectit l6511s19vas that SELCO granted recommended by the County Engineer. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Krepela and lVir. O'Neill. -16- M On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded Change Order 41 on Contract 7032-1 the County Engineer. M by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that be approved as recommended by Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Krepela and i�Ir. O'Neill. The question of furnishing sewers tothe Wil -Car property on Rt. 10 comes before the Board and it was cited that in order to run sewers to Johnson Creek the trunk sewer would cott$329,0007 and to pump to Proctors Creek $116,000 is the estimated cost. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr. O'Neill, it is resolved that the County Administrator be authorized to write guaranteeing sewer service to this area, provided $150,000 is paid in connection fees and a suitable agreement is reached on the treatment of strong sewage. Ayes: Mir. Horner, Mir. Myers, Mr. Krepela and i"Ir. O'Neill. Nays: Pair. Apperson, stating he does not agree with the guarantee. Mr. Apperson again questions the County Engineer as to the availability of sewers for Fuqua Farms. On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that the application of Mri O.T.Davis for Bingo games for the Olde Coach Civic Association to raise funds for the area- be and it hereby is approved. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. Mr. Horner again raises the question about hard -surfacing the streets in Chestnut Hills Subdivision and the County Administrator was directed to request immediate action in this area. The Compensation Board sent notification of the amounts given to each Constitutional Office -for the fiscal year 1973-74, which notices are filed with the papers of this Board. On motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Mr. Krepela, it is resolved that the agreement between Chesterfield County and the Virginia Division of Forestry for timber marking on the Park property at Rt. 360 and Courthouse Road, be and it hereby is approved. Ayes: Mr. Horn, -r, Miro Myers, Mir. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mir.O'Neill. On motion of MIr.Krepela, seconded by Mr.0INeill, it is resolved that a Change Order in the electrical contract with the Hendricks Construction Company for the construction of the maintenance hangar at the l:irport be and it hereby is approved. Ayes: Mr. Myers, Mr. Krepela and ",1r. O'Neill. Mr. Apperson abstains from voting. On motion of P,.r.Krepel, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that the following erroneous tax claims be and they hereby are -17- M approved for payment: M.Roy Battista 8339 Haleswo.th Rd. Richmond, Virginia Roland E.Jlhite P.O.Box 1477 Richmond, Va, Elaine S. Loney 5500 Claridge Dr. Chesterfield, Va. 11 1973 Co.motor vehicle license stickers $30.00 Personal Property 1972 53.38 Personal Property 1972 53.04 Ayes: Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Pir..O'Neill. At the further request of the School Board, it is on motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by lair. Apperson, the following resolution is adopted: De it hereby resolved that Chesterfield County, Virginia, a political subdivision, created by Chapter 1001 Acts of Virginia 1900, acting by and through the Board of Supervisors, does hereby elect to have such of the non-professional employees of the Chesterfield County School Board, who are regularly employed full time on a salary basis and whose tenure is not restricted as to temporary or provi- sional appointment, to become eligible to participate under the Group Life Insurance program effective August 11 1973 under conditions set forth in Section 51-111.67:1 through Sections 51-111.67:13 of the Code of Virginia, as such Code has been or may be amended from time to time and said Chesterfield County School Board agrees to deduct from said employees wages and pay over in the manner prescribed, the respective amounts required by law, and, further to pay the required employer cost. Now, Therefore, C. E. Curtis , Chairman of the School Board of Chesterfield County, and Robert A. Lux, Clerk of the Chesterfield County .school Board, are hereby authorized and directed in the name of said County, to execute any required contract in order that the non-professional employees of the Chesterfield County School Board may become eligible to participate in the Group Life Insurance Program as provided in the aforementioned sections of the Code of Virginia. In execution of any contract which may be required, the seal of the Chesterfield County School Board shall be affixed and attested by the Clerk and said officers of the Chesterfield County School Board are authorized and directed to pay from time to time such sums as are due to be paid under said contract by the Chesterfield County School Board and its employees. Ayes: Mir. i_vlr. Apperson, mr.Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Mr. O'Neill, it is resolved that the bid for two (2) animal rescue units in the amount of $2950.00 each be awarded to the Swab Wagon Company, who submitted the low bid. Ayes: Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that bids for 24 vehicles be awarded to the various low bidders, provided a sedan for the School iaoard is an economy car. Ayes: Fir. Myers, Nir. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Nir.Krepela it is resolved that this Board requests the Judge of Circuit Court, the Honorable Ernest P. Gates, to re -appoint the following officers in the Auxiliary Police Unit: 1. Unit 179 J. W. Keesling 9. Unit 188 E. Eggleston, Sr. 2. Unit 181 J.E.Graham 10. Unit 190 W.T°,,.McClintock 3. Unit 182 A.L.Hammel 11. Unit 19e B.R.Young 4. Unit 183 G.L. Hood 12. Unit 193 J.F.!jood 5. Unit 184 J.F.Clayton, Jr. 13. Unit 194 H.M.Self,Jr. 6, Unit 185 O.C. Graves 14. Unit 195 C. R. lfiatson 7. Unit 186 J.R.Beavers 15. Unit 198 R.L.vaughan 8. Unit 187 W.P,'i.Colbert And Be it Further Resolved, that the following five ( 5 ) mer,, be appointed to the Auxiliary Police Unit: John Burley Edens, III Richard Noore King, Jr. Gus Scottman Shipley Lynwood Neal Morris James Kenneth Andrews Ayes: Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Mr. Krepela it is resolved that the bill for Mr. Fred Gray in the amount of 51,949.39 for legal expenses in the Consolidation School Case to June 1, 1973, be paid. Ayes: Mr. Myers, Mr. Epperson, Mr. Krepela and Fir. O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. O'Neill, it is resolved that Salisbury Country Club be authorized to have a pyrotechnic display on July 49 1973, provided the usual rules imposed in such an event be followed. Ayes• Nir. Myers, Mr. Apperson, 1�Ir.Krepela and Nir .O'Neill. On motion of Mr. by T�ir.Krepela it is resolved that the sum of $900000 be transferred from 41 -421 -Instruction to 41 -451 -Transportation in the School Budget for 1972-173. Ayes: Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Dir.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. —19— M n Mrr. Apperson brought to the attention of the Board the recent drowning of a young boy in one of Chesterfield's ponds, and raised the question, `--Should not all ponds be fenced to safe- guard citizens of the County in the future-? It was generally agreed that the Commonwealths Attorney would look into this matter. It is reported that the Horne Builders' Association of Richmond has answered the request of the Board to reply to the request of the County Fire Department to have fire hydrants installed on multi -family construction before the sheathing or roof decking is installed. The Home Builders' indicated that the prevailing County policy should be followed because fire hazards are the total responsi- bility of the builder or developer, it is too hard to some case,: to install roads and water lines due to the weather and such a proposed policy would not be feasible. On motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Mr.O'Neill, it is resolved that this Board adjourns at 7:40 P.M. to 11:00 A.M. on June 26, 1973 in the Finance Uffice of the State. Ayes: Mr. Myers, Fir. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and mr.OlNeill. -20 Goy DOUGLAS B. FUGATE, COMMISSIONER MORRILL M. CROWE, RICHMOND, VA. LE ROY EAKIN, JR., McLEAN, VA. EARL A. FITZPATRICK, ROANOKE, VA. THOMAS R. GLASS, LYNCHBURG, VA. LEONARD R. HALL, BRISTOL, VA. DOUGLAS G. JANNEY, FREDERICKSBURG, VA. ROBERTS. LANDES, STAUNTON, VA. WILLIAM T. ROOS, YORKTOWN, VA. L. R. TREAT, JR. DISTRICT ENGINEER DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS 1221 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, VA. 23219 P. 0. Box 3036 Bon Air, Virginia 23235 April 25, 1973 Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Burnett: JOHN E. HARWOOD, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER W. S. G. BRITTON, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION A. K. HUNSBERGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING H. GORDON BLUNDON, ' DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING J. M. WRAY, JR., DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS OFFICE OF DISTRICT ENGINEER PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA 23803 This is to acknowledge receipt of the Boards' resolution dated April 11, 1973 requesting the Virginia Department of Highways to improve an access road west of County Line Road (Rte. 671) at a cost not to exceed $2,500 to be paid from the County's 3C road fund. We are in the process of applying for an accounts receivable number so that we might proceed with this requested work during the summer months. We regret that we will not be able to take this road over for State maintenance until it meets the criteria for our rural addition funding. It is my understanding that the County only wishes to provide suitable access for the residents living along this road to State hard surface road (Rte. 671). If this is not in accordance with the Boards' thinking, please advise at an early date before we commence with construction. ELCjr/vcn cc: Mr. A. J. Krepela Very truly yours, ,mac E. L. Covingto:�Jr. Resident Engineer A HIGHWAY 15 AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT J* COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA April 279 1973 1-1r, Gerald C. highsmith 4275 Lamplighter Ct. Richmondq Virginia De --r Mr. highsmith: Lo The division of the land off Newby's Bridge Road as discussed before the Board of supervisors of Chesterfield County recently is contrary to the agreement reached* Our records show that you or Mr. Crostic were given a Vai mince to build two homes facing the dirt road and tris office has been presented with a Deed deparating the parcels of land in a different fashion from originally contemplated and granting a 25-ft,strip of road leading n(.-, where and t,.e ar,, completely in the dark as to your intentions in this matter, till you please have Mr. Blankenship or other surveyors explain to the County how his plat dated February 23, 1973 originated and what we can do to satisfy the agreements reached with the Board of Supervisors. Before a building permit is granted this natter should be cleared. W CC: Mr.james Shiavo Mr, E.L,MumMa Mr. Robt. M,Blankenship Sincerely, M. W. Burnett County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WIN G. HORNER, CHAIRMAN CLOVER HILL DISTRICT LEO MYERS, VICE CHAIRMAN BERMUDA DISTRICT COU N T Y Im BOARD OF SUPERVISORS J. RUFFIN APPERSON DALE DISTRICT ALDRICH J. KREPELA MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT E. MERLIN O'NEILL, SR. MATOACA DISTRICT O F C H E S T E R F I E L D CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA M. W. BURNETT ROBERT'A. PAINTER. COUNTY ENGINEER EXECUTIVE SECRETARY ENGINEERING AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENT April 16, 1973 Mr. M. W. Burnett Map Section: 77-1 Executive Secretary, Property: County of Chesterfield, Gerald G. Highsmith, Sr.., & Chesterfield, Va. Patsy Crostic Highsmith (Wife) Dear Mel: Attached hereto find Deed of Dedication between Gerald C. Highsmith, Sr., & the County of Chesterfield, Va. Your attention is called to the plat attached to the above deed of dedication, this does not connect with an existing dedicated road. Please advise if this meets with your approval? Sincerely, i A. J. Bridges Right of Way Engineer AJB /mb cc: Robert A. Painter, County Engineer 973 10h,Motion of Mr. Horner, seconded by Vir.Apperson, it is resolved that the following be and it hereby is adopted: AN ORDINANCE to vacate a 16 -foot easement in the subdivision of Shenandoah in Clover Hill District, Chesterfield County, Virginia] a plat of which, made by J.K.Timmons & Associates, recorded in Plat Hook 16, pages 85 and 86, in the Clerkb s �J .: ice of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County,Virginia, the said 16 -foot easement being unimproved and not used for public purposes and being more particularly shown on a portion of the.aforesaid subdivision plat, dated October 19, 072 shaded in red, a copy of which is attached hereto and madea part hereof by this reference. WHEREAS, the Shenandoah Corporation has petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,Virginia, to vacate the 16 -foot wide unimproved easement in the said subdivision of Shenandoah as shown shaded in red on plat of a portion of said Shenandoah Sub - division as aforesaid,. a copy of which is attached hereto a:nd made,a part hereof of this reference. WHEREAS, notice of the adoption of this ordinance has been given in accordance with Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors, of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia: 1. That pursuant to Section 15.1-4821 bf the Code of Virginia,. 1950, as amended, that the unimproved 16 -foot easement described above and shown shaded in red on the aforesaid plat, be -and it is hereby `vacated. 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accordance with Section 15.1-482 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and a certified copy thereof together with the plat attached shall be -recorded in the Clerk's Office of the CLrcu it Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia. Ayes: Mr. Ho-.-ner, Mr, Myers, Mr. Apperson, and Mr.O'Neill. On motion of Mr.Horner, seconded by D'Ir. Myers, it is resolved that two (2) building permit: be authorized, provided sufficient width can be secured for lots onthe end of Crostic Road and provided further that a 50 -ft. right-of-way be dedicated from the road to the access road the Highway Department proposes to build because of Rt. 288 to the lots in question and that it be thoroughly understood that the County has no obligation to construct or maintain this richt-of-ways. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers and Mr.O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr.O'Neilly it is resolved that this Boar,_ go into Executive session for lunch and a discussion of matters that may be a matter of a future public hearing. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers and Mr. OtNeill. -7- 0 - r Exist ZD' Rax' in Common Za, S 83' 6'4f ,S,v; k r pRMERL C CR05T l 23.58 � ZD' —000 I ght of woy\ N 25 j Vim. N ego 46-' 2 t' -p�icoted of Chester Z , F� Zln� 55� ��SQ � _ N k o� o S87°Q 30"E • COMP/L fo p/ -19F OF 0.6015 iqe RE PARCEL OF L qN0 9OL17H OF 111E"GUBYS 5A 109E A G'lOMA H111 O/5TR/CT' CHESTERF/ELD CO, Ufa Rob'f M. Blonkenship -E leo(, Nj/ ,?ichrnond, Uo. W 4 v ROBERT M. BLANKENSHIP, III U CERTIFICATE N0. > 649 & 40 4-k-' tANO 5 Feb Z3, 1973 ke�1, moy 30, 19913 d. r ' CA - LAW OFFICES (P WOOD & STREET ���%3 SUITE 1501, 700 BUILDING 700 EAST MAIN STREET RICHMOND, VIROINIA 23201 P. 0. BOX 95 ANDREW W. WOOD TELEPHONE 0703) 644.7996 W. SCOTT STREET, III May 25, 1973 M, W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Re: Vacation of a 60 -foot Street on a parcel of 4.071 acres of land situated on the southern line of Chesterfield Avenue between Buford and Pavilion Streets in Bon Air Dear Mr. Burnett: I am enclosing herewith the petition of Joellyn T. Duesberry and A. Reginal Duesberry, her husband, with reference to the above. Also enclosed is a draft of the proposed ordinance and a copy of the notice to be published in accordance with Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia. I would appreciate your placing this proposed ordinance on the docket for the Board of Supervisors meeting scheduled for June 13, 1973, at 9:00 a.m. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Yours very truly, owl W. Scott Street,' III WSSIII:cls Enclosures cc: Mr. and Mrs. A. Reginal Duesberry P E T I T I O N To: The Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County, Virginia Re: Vacation of a 60 -foot street on a parcel of 4.071 Acres of land situated on the southern line of Chesterfield Avenue between Buford and Pavilion Streets in Bon Air Your petitioners, Joellyn T. Duesberry and A. Reginal Duesberry, her husband, respectfully represent: 1. That they are the record owners of that certain parcel of land shown on the plat and titled "Map of 4.071 Acres of Land Situated on the Southern Line of Chesterfield Avenue between Buford and Pavilion Streets, Chesterfield, Co., Va." made by Chas. H. Fleet & Assocs., Civil Eng'r. & Surveyors, dated January 16, 1956, and recorded February 3, 1956, in the Deed Book 491, at page 333, in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, through which property there has been dedicated to the County of Chesterfield a 60 -foot street. This street is more particularly described on the aforesaid plat dated January 16, 1956, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. 2. That your petitioners desire to have the said 60 -foot street vacated inasmuch as it is not improved and serves no public purpose, either presently or in the future, and such vacation will not abridge the rights of any person hereby. WHEREFORE, your petitioners pray that the Board of Supervisors will consider the Ordinance attached hereto for adoption in order that the aforesaid 60 -foot street be abandoned and vacated in accordance with Section 15.1-482, of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Respectfully, JOELLYN T. DUESBERRY and A. REGINAL DUESBERRY W. Scott Street, III By w ` ®400217 Wood & Street Of Counse P. O. Box 95 Richmond, Virginia 23201 r o /.jWij, .AW c �1 l2.S 0 To !;� & ID Qir e.11 ®,�i ,• moo-�.� ®eor z ®•2 0/ Chas . 1117� 1W TARE NOTICE that on the 13th day of June, 19730 at 9 o'clock A. M., or as soon thereafter as may be heard, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, at its regular meeting place in the Board Room of the County Courthouse at Chesterfield, Virginia, will consider the following ordinance for adoption: AN ORDINANCE to vacate a 60 -foot street in Bon Air, a plat of which entitled "Map of 4.071 Acres of Land Situated on the Southern Line of Chesterfield Avenue between Buford and Pavilion Streets, Chesterfield Co., Va." made by Chas. H. Fleet & Assocs., Civil Eng'r. & Surveyors.. dated January 16, 1956, and recorded February 3, 1956, in the Clark's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, in Deed Hook 491, at page 333, the said 60 -foot street being unimproved and not used for public purposes and being more particularly shown as the portion of the aforesaid plat, dated January 16, 1956, shaded in red and designated as "McRae Street'", a copy of which plat is attached hereto and made a part hereof of this reference. The complete text of the proposed Ordinance it, on file in the office of the Executive Secretary of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, and may be examined by all interested parties between the hours of 9:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., .Monday through Friday. If 1. On motion of Mr. seconded by Mr. , it is hereby resolved that the salary increases established and approved for the 1973-74 budget are hereby approved and extended to become effective June 1, 1973 i3 :3f 3 and $23,508.00 is hereby appropriated from various unappropriated surplus or fund balances as follows: Fund 11 -General Fund $14,394.00 Fund 13 -Library Fund 1,700.00 Fund 17 -County Garage 370.00 Fund 21 -Welfare 1,500.00 Fund 22 -Nursing Home 1,000.00 Fund 31 -Ettrick Sanit�Lry Distr. 32..00 Fund 61 -Water Oerating 1,565.00 Fund 63 -Water Impr., Repl. F Ext. 594.00 Fund 66 -Water Meter Installation 679.00 Fund 71 -Sewer Operating 988.00 Fund 73 -Sewer Impr., Rep. $ Ext. 686.00 VI RGI NI A: a special meeting of the Chesterfieldounty School Board held Wednesday morning, 8:00 a. m. Ja,%6:1n, 11.)73, School Administration Building, Chester- field, Virginia PRESENT: 1Vir. C. E. Curtis, Jr., Chairman IVir. J. W. Russell, Vice-chairman Mr. P. T. Holmes Dr. G. R. Partin Mr. E. A. Moseley, Jr. Under motion of Dr. Partin seconded by 1Vir. Russell, be it resolved that the salary increases for the school board employees and personnel as established and approved in the 1973-74 budget are hereby approved and extended to become effective June 1, 1973, subject to approval of the necessary appropriation by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, in the sum of $49, 804.83. Be it further resolved that the superintendent forthwith transmit a true copy of this resolution to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, for action on the appropriation herein requested. Robert A. Lux, C erk A copy: teste- DOUGLAS B. FUGATE. COMMISSIONER MORRILL M. CROWE, RICHMOND, VA. LE ROY EAKIN, JR., McLEAN, VA. EARL A. FITZPATRICK, ROANOKE, VA. THOMAS R. GLASS, LYNCHBURG, VA. LEONARD R. HALL, BRISTOL, VA. DOUGLAS G. JANNEY, FREDERICKSBURG, VA. ROBERT S. LANDES, STAUNTON. VA. WILLIAM T. ROOS, YORKTOWN, VA. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS 1221 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, VA. 23219 June 6, 1973 Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Gentlemen: JOHN E. HARWOOD, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER W. S. G. BRITTON, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION A. K. HUNSBERGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING H. GORDON BLUNDON, DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING J. M. WRAY, JR., DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO Secondary System Addition and Abandonment Chesterfield County As requested in resolution by your Board on May 9, 1973, the following addition to and abandonment from the Secondary System in Chesterfield are hereby approved, effective June 6, 1973. ADDITION LENGTH Sections 3 and 4 of new location Route 603 from station 99+00 to Powhatan Co. Line, project 0603-020-155,C501;156,B640. 0.20 Mi. ABANDONMENT Sections 1 and 2 of old location Route 603 from station 99+00 to Powhatan County Line, project 0603-020-155,C501;156,B640. 0.20 Mi. Sincerely, E. Harwood, Deputy Commissioner Copies: Mr. A. S. Mattox Mr. J. P. Mills, Jr. Mr. C. A. Palmer Mr. L. R. Treat, Jr. Mr. L. H. Dawson, Jr. Mr. E. L. Covington, Jr. - Chesterfield A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT 1`111111W 11%W RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY 9 1 5 MUTUAL BUILDING • RICHMOND,VIRGINIA 2 3 2 1 9 TELEPHONE 649.8494 Honorable M. W. Burnett Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: June 7, 1973 The Bond Resolution adopted by the Richmond Metropolitan Authority December 30, 1970, states that not less than 30 days prior to the beginning of each fiscal year, the Authority shall prepare and adopt a budget for such fiscal year. The Resolution further directs that a copy shall be filed with the County of Chesterfield. The Authority's fiscal year begins July 1 and we are pleased to enclose a copy of the 1973-74 Budget for operation of the toll facilities of the Authority and, also, the Budget for administra- tive expenses which are still part of the construction fund. Your continued interest in this project is greatly appreci- ated. Sincerely, Allen G. McCabe, Jr. Comptroller AGMCC/sp Enc. M 19 RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY Budgets Year Ending June 30, 1974 Operation of Toll Facilities Administrative Expenses (Construction Fund) Approved HOWARD, NEEDLES, TAN24EN & BERGENDOFF x fApproved as -`'to revenue estimates K x I 'WILBUR SMITH & ASSOCIATES L,Ax RICEIMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY BUDGET YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1974 Operating Revenues Operating Expenses (see attached) Net Available for Debt Service 5/16/73 $1,056,000. 441,710. 614, 290. n n RICER40ND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY OPERATING BUDGET FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUINE 30, 1973 A)J'' .IN1STRATION Insurance Administrative Charge Publicity and Public Relations Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance Total Administration r't D V"D A T Tf1T\T Toll Accounting and Audit_ Money Handling Services Toll Collection Personal Services Social Security Taxes Employer Contribution - Life Insurance Employer Contribution - Hospital Insurance Uniforms and Personal Supplies Stationery, Printing and Supplies Telephone and Telegraph Haat, Light and Power Building Supplies Miscellaneous Rent - Toll Plaza, Blvd. Bridge Rental of Automatic Toll Equipment Motor Vehicle Operation and Maintenance Contract Janitorial Service Hi hhwav Lihting Power Materials and Supplies Irraffic Control Miscellan ous $228,000. 13,250. 710. 5,000. 4,100. 1,000. 1,500. 4,800. 200. 200. 1,500. 65,500. 900. 3,300, $ 8,400. 1,000. 5/15/73 1 of 2 $ 7,200. 45,600. 10,000. 500. $ 63,300. $ 9,900. $329,960. $ 9,400. 250. Total Operation $349,510. %W RICID40ND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY OPERATING BUDGET FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1973 MAINTENANCE Roadway and Bridges �VContractual Services Grounds and Buildings Miscellaneous Materials and Supplies Contractual Services Total Maintenance OTHER Annual Reports Trustee and Paying Agent Fees Traffic Engineers Accounting and Auditing Total Other TOTAL OPERATING EXPE19SES 2 of 2 $ 2,000. $ 50. 500. 4,500. 5,050. $ 7,050. $ 100. 10,750. 7,500. 3,500. $ 21,850. 441, 710. M In RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY 5/14/73 BUDGET FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1974 ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES (CONSTRUCTION F(JND) Personal Services - Employees $ 95,200. Personal Services - Others 3,500. Social Security Taxes 4,638. Employer's Contribution Retirement 11855. Employer's Contribution Life Insurance 250. Disability insurance 1,687. Blue Cross 990. Telephone & Telegraph 2,800. Postage 500. Printing and Binding 700. *Photographic and Blue -print 15,000. Repairs and Maintenance - Equipment 450. *Travel Expenses - Employees 7,000. Travel Expenses - others 275. Administrative Materials and Supplies 750. *Insurance and Surety Bonds 61500. Rental of Building and Equipment 9,600. Other Charges and obligations 2,100. Administrative Credits X55,000. X98,795. Estimates for these items are based on assumption that financing will occur, contracts will be let, and construction will begin in this fiscal year. 1 c2 . 8 _- 4X AA''1 June 11, 1973 Mr. E. L. Covington, Jr., Resident Engineer Virginia Department of Highways Post Office Box 3036 Bon Air, Virginia Dear Mr. Covington: J. R. Appelman 5624 Stella Road Richmond, Virginia 23234 Phone: 276-7201 I am writing this letter in regards to the placement of speed limit signs on Stella Road in Chesterfield County. As you may know, within the last 18 months Stella Road was lowered, widened, Paved and extended into the Belmont Parkway Apartment Complex. Now that the improvements have been completed, only one speed limit sign (25 m.p.h.) is in evidence between the apartment complex and Belmont Road. I have enclosed a rough sketch to help illustratethe situation. The sign is of a rather small size and is placed where it is not easily seen as you turn right off of Belmont Road, onto Stella Road. The majority of the traffic turning onto Stella Road from Belmont Road is right hand turn traffic coming from the Chippenham Parkway intersection, and as traffic turns right, the sign is on the right. For traffic leaving the apartment area onto Stella Road and traveling to- wards Belmont Road there are no traffic control devices at all. The intent and purpose of this letter is to request that your office and staff survey the situation and if you find it necessary, please try to correct what I feel is presently inadequate traffic control. I realize that in residential areas, unless otherwise posted, the speed limit is 25 m.p.h. But apparently a great deal of motorists from the Belmont Parkway Apartment Complex do not. Herein lies my major concern. I myself have 2 children and all my neighbors on Stella Road have children which we all dearly love, and do not want hurt. But, if some means of slowing down these motorists is not found, I am very much afraid someone is going to get badly hurt or killed. I have called the County Police and they have promised increased surveilence, but so fax the speeding seems to have actually gott%n more severe. I had intended to write the Chesterfield County Police Chief to request a radar set-up. However, I though perhaps the first step should be to try to get larger and more clearly visible speed limit signs placed. If this proves to still be insufficient, then -2 - I'll write the request of a radar set-up. I hope that I've given you enough in- formation to go on. If you should need any additional information, please do not hesitate to call.or write me. If you will be so kind, I am awaiting your reply. Respectfully yours, ,N. R.lman Pe P JRA:pw Enclosure cc: Colonel H. W. Burgess Virginia State Police Post Office Box 27472 Richmond, Virginia Colonel E. P. Gill Chesterfield County Police Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 'I' � � �, ' 1. � � � !, ,� /A/ / 64. 1.4000, 009 O. j Jlf-- .... ._...._ f ✓,- ._ . � ,... [`". !i . _. .' ,' fit. -� .._.ii'�._ry P, .1. � ... _ _ / 64. 1.4000, 009 O. j Jlf-- .... ._...._ f ✓,- ._ . � ,... [`". !i . _. .' ,' fit. -� .._.ii'�._ry P, .1. � ... _ _ VIRGINIA: At a rec.,,*Lgr meeting of Chester- field hester-field County, helot the Courthouse on June 13, 1973 at 9:00 A,M, AN ORDINANCE to provide for the rearrangement of the boundary lines of the Chester Precinct in Bermuda Magisterial (District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, by dividing said precinct and creating two new precincts, said division being occasioned by the increase in the number of registered voters in the existing Chester Precinct and alleviate the crowded conditions at the polls on election day. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA: 1. Pursuant to authority contained in the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, Section 24.1-37 and Section 24.1-39,1 the Chester Voting Precinct of Bermuda Magisterial District is hereby rearranged and the following voting precincts and respectiv( polling places are created and established as set forth in this ordinance. NORTH CHESTER VOTING PRECINCT: Beginning at the intersection of Proctor's Creek and U. S. Interstate Route No. 95; thence running southwardly along the center line of U. S. Inter- state Route No. 95 to its intersection with State Route No. 10; thence in a westwardly direction along the center line of State Route No. 10 to its intersection with the center line of Chalkley Road (State Route No. 632); thence northwardly along Chalkley.Road to its intersection with the center line of Centralia Road (State Route No. 145); thence along the center line of Centralia Road eastwardly to its intersection with the center line of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad right of way; thence northwardly along the center line of said railroad right of way to its intersection with the center line of Proctor's Creek; thence eastwardly along the center line of Proctor's Creek to the point of beginning'. The voting place therein is to be at Thomas Dale High School. SOUTH CHESTER VOTING PRECINCT: Beginning at the intersection of Route No. 10 and U. S. Interstate No. 95; thence running southwardly along the center line of U. S. Interstate No. 95 to its intersection with the northern boundary line of the City of Colonial Heights; thence along the boundary line of the City of Colonial Heights and Chesterfield County in a southerly and westerly direction to its intersection with the center line of the Seaboard Coast Line Railroad right of way; thence northerly along the center line of said railroad right of way to its intersection with the center line of Happy Hill Road (State Route No. 619); thence along the center line of Happy Hill Road as it runs in a northerly and westerly direction intersecting U. S. Route No. 1 and Harrowgate Road (State Route No. 144) to its intersection with the center line of Branders Bridge Road (State Route No. 625); thence continuing in a northwesterly direction along the center line of Branders Bridge Road to its intersection with the center line of State Route No. 10; thence in a northerly and easterly direction along the center line of State Route No. 10 to the point of beginning. C`Q.1.,6 The voting p ace therein is to b at the r - F -ire -.use-. �oo k ►-� n Q,,�� G ��� �� 2. The secretary of the Electoral Board shall notify, by mail, mt later than fifteen (15) days prior to the next general, special or primary election, all registered voters whose precinct and/or polling place has been changed by the provision of this ordinance. 3. Should any section or provision of this ordinance be decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section or provision of this ordinance. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its adoption and enactment by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. A Copy: Teste - County Administrator AN ORDINANCE to provide for the rearrangement of the boundaries of Bon Air Precinct in Midlothian Magisterial District land Crestwood Precinctin Midlothian Magisterial District, (Chesterfield County, Virginia, by dividing the existing Bon Air and Crestwood Precincts and creating"a new voting precinct to be known as the Huguenot Precinct so that the boundaries of the precincts'-Foincide with the existing boundaries of the United States Congressional Districts and the Commonwealth of Virginia Senatorial Districts, and to rearrange- the boundaries of Wagstaff Circle Precinct, in Clover Hill Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, by creating a new voting precinct to be known as Shenandoah Precinct in order to conform Wagstaff Circle Precinct and the newly created Shenandoah Precinct with the existing bounda�y lines of the United States Congressional District lines and the Commonwealth of Virginia Senatorial District lines; and to establith the voting places at all of the newly arranged voting precincts in Chesterfield County, Virginia. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA: 1. Pursuant to authority contained in the Code of Virgiria of 1950, as amended, Sections 24.1-37 and 24.1-39, the Bon Air Election District, the Crestwood Election District and the Huguenot Election District, all in the Midlothian Magisterial District of Chesterfield County, Virginia, and the Wagstaff Circle Election District and Shenandoah Election District in the Clover Hill Magisterial District of Chesterfield County, Virginia, and the respective polling places in each Election District are creates and established as set forth in this ordinance. RM ATR VnTTNG PRECINCT: Beginning at the intersection of the center line of the Southern Railway with the boundary line between Chesterfield County and the City of Richmond; thence northwardly and westwardly again along said boundary line to its intersection with the center line of Huguenot Road (State Route No. 147); thence westwardly along the center line of Huguenot Road to its intersection with the Southern Railway; thence eastwardly along the center line of the Southern Railway to the point of beginning. The voting place therein is to be at Bon Air Community House. i CRESTWOOD VOTING PRECINCT: Beginning at the intersection of the center line of U. S. Route No. 60 with the boundary line between Chesterfield County and the City of Richmond; thence northwardly and westwardly along said boundary line to its intersection with the Southern Railway; thence westwardly along the center line of the Southern Railway to its intersection with Buford Road (County Route No. 678); thence southwardly along the center line of Buford Road to its intersection with U. S. Route No. 60; thence eastwardly along the center line of U. S. Route No. 60 to the point of beginning. The voting place therein is to be at Crestwood Elementary School. HUGUENOT VOTING PRECINCT: Beginning at the intersection of U. S. Route No. 60 and Buford Road (County Route No. 678); thence in a northerly direction along the center line of Buford Road to its intersection with the Southern Railway; thence westwardly along the center line of the Southern Railway to its intersection with State Route No. 147; thence westwardly and southwardly along the center line of State Route No. 147 to its intersection with U. S. Route No. 60; thence along the center line of U. S. Route No. 60 to the point of beginning. The voting place therein is to be at Brighton Green Community Center. SHENANDOAH VOTING PRECINCT: Beginning at the intersection of the center line of Reams Road with the center line of S. Arch Road; thence in a northerly direction along the center line of South Arch Road continuing into the center line of North Arch Road to the intersection of U. S. Route No. 60; thence westwardly along the center line of U. S. Route No. 60 to the intersection of Courthouse Road; thence southwardly along the center line of Courthouse Road to the intersection of Reams Road and easterly along the center line of Reams Road to the point of beginning. The voting' -place therein is to be at Shenandoah Community Center. WAGSTAFF CIRCLE VOTING PRECINCT: Beginning at the intersection of the center line of Courthouse Road with the center line of U. S. Route No. 360; thence northwardly along the center line of Courthouse Road to its intersection with the center line of Reams Road; thence eastwardly along the center line of Reams Road to its intersection with the center line of South Arch Road; thence in a northerly direction along the center line of South Arch Road continuing into the center line of North Arch Road to its intersection with the center line of U. S. Route No. 60; thence eastwardly along the center line of U. S. Route 60 to its intersection with the boundary line between Chesterfield County and the City of Richmond; thence southwardly along said boundary line to its intersection with the center line of U. S. Route No. 360; thence westwardly along the center line of U. S. Route No. 360 to the point of beginning. The voting place therein is to be at Providence Junior High School. 0 i M M 2. The secretary of the Electoral Board shall notify, by mail, not later than fifteen (15) days prior to the next general, special or primary election, all registered voters whose precinct and/or polling place has been changed by the provision of this ordinance. 3. Should any section or provision of this ordinance be decided to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section or provision of this ordinance. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its adoption and enactment by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. AN ORDINANCE to amend and reordain Ch^pter 3, Article III, of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, by addi thereto four new sections, Section 3-20, 3-21, 3-22 and 3-23, to prohibit the open burning of leaves from trees during certain peripds of the year and within certain hours of the day; to prohibit b when leaf pick-up service is made available; and to establish penalties for violation thereof. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1. That Chapter 3, Article III, of the Code of the Co of Chesterfield, Virginia, be amended by adding thereto four new sections, Section 3-20, 3-21, 3-22 and 3-23, to read as follows: Section 3-20. Burning of leaves; when prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to burn leaves in the open during the period beginning May 16 and ending October 15 of any year, and during the period beginning December 16 and ending March 15 of any year; except, however, that for a period of 30 days commencing with the effective date of this ordinance open burning of leaves shall be permitted. Section 3-21. Burning of leaves; when allowed. (a) It shall be lawful for persons to burn leaves from trees on property where they reside during the period beginning October 16 and ending December 15 of any year, and during the period beginning March 16 and ending May 15 of any year, (b) Provided, however, that during such latter period (March 16 to May 15) such burning will be unlawful if it occurs within three hundred feet of any woodland or brushland unless it takes place between the hours of four o'clock post meridian and twelve o'clock midnight. Section 3-22. Burning of leaves prohibited when pick-up service available. (a) Within the bounds of any area designated by the Board of Supervisors and duly proclaimed by said Board as an area in which a county leaf pick-up service shall be provided by said Board on a once -a -week basis during the periods when leaf burning under Section 3-21 above would be otherwise permitted, it shall be unlawful to burn leaves at any time. Ey M (c) In the event the Board of Supervisors shall chose to make the pick-up service mentioned in paragraph (a) above available in a designated area, it shall do so by describing said area by metes and bounds in a notice published once a week for two successive weeks in a newspaper having general circulation in said area and by posting said notice in at least five (5) public places within the area so designated. Section 3-23. Penalties. Any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be liable to a fine of not more than five hundred dollars for each violation. This ordinance shall be and become in full force and effect upon its passage as provided by law. RICHMOND NEWSPAPERS, INC. FE�THI" Publisher of RICHMOND TIME: --DISPATCH 6/6/73 Richmond, Va........... I ......................... Legal Notice This is to certify that the attached ............................................... was published in The Richmond Times -Dispatch, a newspaper published in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia. 5/30/73 6/6/73 3073 The first insertion being given.... worn to and subscribed before me this n ,lUN 1 1 1973 NotAry Publict State of Virginia, City of Richmond: My commission expires 2 / 25 / 7 7 ...........l -r ...................................... t- ................ SPENCER OWENS MR., BUSINESS Ma ........................................................ TITLE i I I AN ORDINANCE to amend and reordain Ch^pter 3, Article III, of the Code of ,the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, by adding thereto four new sections, Section 3-20, 3-21, 3-22 and 3-23, to prohibit the open burning of leaves from trees during certain periI ods of the year and within certain hours of the day; to prohibit burning when leaf pick-up service is made available; and to establish penalties.for violation thereof. 1 BE IT ORDAINED. BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA: i i 1. That Chapter 3, Article III, of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, be amended by adding thereto four new, sections, Section, 3-20, 3-21, 3-22 and 3-23, to read as follows: Section 3-20 Burning of leaves, when prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to burn leaves in the open during the period beginning May 16 and ending October 15 of any year, and during the period beginning December 16 and ending March 15 of any year; except, however, that for a period ofd 30 days „commencing with the effective date of this ordinance open burning of leaves shall be permitted. Section 3-21 Burning -of leaves; when allowed. (a) It shall be lawful for persons to burn leaves from trees on property where they reside during the period beginning October 16 and ending December 15 of ariy year, and during the � period beginning March 16 and ending May 15 of any year, (b) Provided, however, that during such latter period (March 16 to May 15) such burning.will be unlawful if it occurs within three hundred feet of any woodland or brushland unless it � r takes place between the hours of four o'clock post meridian and 1 twelve o' clock''midnight . Burning of leaves rohibited when pick-� Section 3-22. Rr. Derice available. (a) Within the bounds of any area designated )y the ' Board of Supervisors and duly proclaimed by said Board as an area in which a county leaf pick-up service shall be provided by said i Board on a once -a -week basis during the periods when leaf burning i J under Sectio n 3-21 above would be otherwise permitted, it shall '' be unlawful to burn leaves at any time. I (c)' In the event the Board of Supervisors shall chose to make the pick-up service mentioned in paragraph (a) above available in a designated area, it shall do so by describing said area by metes and bounds in a notice published once a week for two successive weeks in a newspaper having general circulation in said area and by posting said notice in at least five (5) public places within the area so designated. Section 3-23. Penalties. Any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be liable'to a fine of not more than five hundred dollars for each violation. This ordinance shall be and become in full force and effect upon its passage as provided by law. E2 WID thO undersigned do herft request the Board OC Supervisors On June 33th 1973 to give the citizens Of Westerfield Gomt, y permission to burn leaves (4) four months of each year. o (VI AN 'ORDINANCE to amend and reordain Ch -peer 3, Ar-iCLkz: III, of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, by adding thereto four new sections, Section 3-201, 3-21, 3-22 and 3-23, to i prohibit the open burning of leaves from trees during certain periods i bf the year and within certain hours of the day; to prohibit burning when leaf pick-up service is made available; and to establish penalties.for violation thereof. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD C'DUNT -Y, vIRG?NIA 1. That Chapter 3, Article III, of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, be amended by adding thereto four new. sections, Section 3-20, 3-21, 3-22, and 3-23, to read as follows,.. t Section 3-20 Burning of leaves; when prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to burn leaves in the open during the period beginning May 16 and ending October 15 of any year, and during'the period beginning December 16 and ending March 15 of any year; except, however, that for a period oft 30 days commencing with the effective date of this ordinance open ,burning of leaves shall be permitted. :a 4 AN 'ORDINANCE to amend and reordain Ch -peer 3, Ar-iCLkz: III, of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, by adding thereto four new sections, Section 3-201, 3-21, 3-22 and 3-23, to i prohibit the open burning of leaves from trees during certain periods i bf the year and within certain hours of the day; to prohibit burning when leaf pick-up service is made available; and to establish penalties.for violation thereof. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD C'DUNT -Y, vIRG?NIA 1. That Chapter 3, Article III, of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, be amended by adding thereto four new. sections, Section 3-20, 3-21, 3-22, and 3-23, to read as follows,.. t Section 3-20 Burning of leaves; when prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to burn leaves in the open during the period beginning May 16 and ending October 15 of any year, and during'the period beginning December 16 and ending March 15 of any year; except, however, that for a period oft 30 days commencing with the effective date of this ordinance open ,burning of leaves shall be permitted. Section 3-21. Burning of leaves; when allowed. (a) It shall be lawful for persons to burn leaves from trees on property where they reside during the period beginning October 16 a"n'd ending December 15 of any year, and during the period beginning March 16 and ending May 15 of any year, (b) Provided, however, that during such latter period (March 16 to May 15) such burning will be unlawful if it occurs within three hundred feet of any woodland>or brushland unless it takes place between the hours of four o'clock post meridian and I twelve o'clock midnight. Section 3-22. Burning of leaves prohibited when pick-ups service available. (a) Within the bounds of any area designated ay the -- s and duly proclaimedby said.Board as an area I Board of .Supervisor y p y' � in which a county leaf pick-up service shall be provided by said Board on a once -a -week basis during the periods when leaf burning (under Section 3-21 above would\be otherwise permitted, it shall ,be unlawful to burn leaves at any time. II � I i i w t.•... :. C,rT'",G ,y'r�. „•. ... .,Y�-r:..:.p.rt'�:wvhKn`•gaY"ar rF.;a;.:r�• _ - :,...,,,. t ..N __.. :a Section 3-21. Burning of leaves; when allowed. (a) It shall be lawful for persons to burn leaves from trees on property where they reside during the period beginning October 16 a"n'd ending December 15 of any year, and during the period beginning March 16 and ending May 15 of any year, (b) Provided, however, that during such latter period (March 16 to May 15) such burning will be unlawful if it occurs within three hundred feet of any woodland>or brushland unless it takes place between the hours of four o'clock post meridian and I twelve o'clock midnight. Section 3-22. Burning of leaves prohibited when pick-ups service available. (a) Within the bounds of any area designated ay the -- s and duly proclaimedby said.Board as an area I Board of .Supervisor y p y' � in which a county leaf pick-up service shall be provided by said Board on a once -a -week basis during the periods when leaf burning (under Section 3-21 above would\be otherwise permitted, it shall ,be unlawful to burn leaves at any time. II � I i i w t.•... :. C,rT'",G ,y'r�. „•. ... .,Y�-r:..:.p.rt'�:wvhKn`•gaY"ar rF.;a;.:r�• _ - :,...,,,. t ..N __.. r (c)" In the event the Board of Supervisors shall chose to make the pick-up service mentioned in paragraph (a) above available in a -designated area, it shall do so by describing said area by metes and bounds in a notice published once a week for i rwo successive weeks in a newspaper having general circulation in said area and by posting said notice in at least five (5) public i places within the area so designated. Section 3-23. Penalties. Any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be liable to a fine of not more than five hundred dollars for each 'i violation. l i This ordinance shall be and become in full force and effect upon its passage as provided by law. 1 f 'ILI' i t. A,�990-'� CA � Q. 7 , /79n 1 5942 Dunnshire Road Richmond, Virginia 23234 May 14, 1973 J. Ruffin Apperson Supervisor Chesterfield County Chesterfield County Courthouse Virginia Dear Mr. Apperson: We are residents of Meadowbrook Manor in the Dale District of Chesterfield County. We have noted that there is a proposed ordinance on leaf burning which will be discussed on June 13, 1973 at a public hearing. As we understand this proposal, leaf burning would be allowed between March 15 and May 15 and between October 15 and December 15. In addition there is a proviso to the effect that the Board of Supervisors can elect to make leaf nick up where possible then making leaf burning unlawful in those designated areas. This proviso meets with our ap�)roval so long as this pick up is free, regular, and frequent. To wit; that the service is good. We urge the Board to adopt this ordinance. Having bagged 160 bags of leaves this year, we are not looking forward to next year. During the 1971-72 season, on the other hand, it only took two evenings of burning to dispose of our leaves. Surely, the burning of leaves will not cause the pollution problem so many of us are frightened of. And, it certainly shouldn't pollute as much as these gasoline powered shredders on the market or the lawn mowers that are used to chop the leaves to make them fit the bags better. Please vote "yes" on this ordinance. Your support on this issue would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, L% �- Charles J. Ockershausen Lynn M. Ockershausen P. S. The attached names tiure obtained from neighbors in our immediate area.. Of 23 couples contacted, 22 signed. cm We, the undersigned, agree with the intent of the Ockershausen,s, letter and also urge support for the proposed ordinance on leaf burning. ADDRESS 2'�Z33 IVA Q! 4c r /r_� j7,,, cG,� �.2--3 2 31�1 I c� 7 ✓� , � �✓ti,.� � . �J �v+-�QC,�a..i � �) l �•Grvi �r1-o-�i-vac ! ��C Wow i Ire. 4 20 �/ r�t.�/ c� t' 29 LEAF BURNING ORDINANCE HE;AIING - June 13, 1973 Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors In It was with a great degree of disappointment that we have observed your approach to 1973 legislative action which allows a more permissive approach to the State Air Pollution Control Board regulations. It is our sincere belief that the setting up of an Air Pollution Control Bogard by that same body in a previous meeting of the State legislatuve was pan honest effort to deal with air pollution, one facet of which is leaf burning in the more densely populated areas. It is our opinion that the latter action was not an attempt to negate that- action but rather that it was an .attempt to liberalize burning activity in areas where alternative solutions were not available. We believe that our county government has the capability and the responsi- bility to provide solutions to what is regarded as a leaf problem by those citizens who have found no way to dispose of excess leaves. The proposed ordinance would concentrate the leaf burning period into two 2 -month periods in the spring and fall which would also concentrate the smoke from leaf burning within a shorter period of time thus adding to air pollution. For obvious reasons, the ordinance also sets up certain conditions of leaf burning near woodlands which would require that burning take place after 4:00 P.1i when the air is still. The stillness of air also contributes to air pollution. There is therefore nothing in the proposed ordinance which could be termed as a reduction of air pollution by restriction of burning times. The only relief possible is in the section which describes the possibility of a leaf pick-up service in designated areas and in the event of such service, it will be unlawful to burn leaves in the areas at any time. Because we believe that it is important seriously the need for a positive approach to for the publio good of the citizens living in the following: that governmental bodies take create a better quality of air the Tri -City area, we propose (1) That any ordinance to be considered be based on certain criteria in accordance with the sense and intent of the State Air Pollution Control Board regulations. (2) That such ordinance should state population density areas in which leaf burning cannot take place at any time, and that leaf pick-up service be made available in these areas at time of adoption of ordinance. (3) That an educational program be developed by the county, based on Extension Department publications from VPI raid materials from other educational centers, on the use of leaves as a valuable natural resource in mulching and composting, and as a soil conditioner. (4) And finally, that the Board of Supervisors explore the advantage of creating an Environmental Commission of knowledgeable citizens for the purpose of study, deliberation, and rocommendations in areas dealing with environmental problems. Because of the technological advances and the necessity of supplying more services to more people in the last twenty to thirty ,years, we are faced with new problems which need new solutions. We have also become more sophisticated in our knowledge of cause and effect. Indeed, we have "named" more diseases and illnesses for which symptoms have been identified simultaneously with the creating of new symptoms and physical difficulties, causing a modern dilemma in health care. The fact that man's techniques are not as sophisticated as his technical knowledge cannot be doubted. Man's implementation falls far short of his knowledge. r Page 2. The speaker can well remember the dray when farmers burned the stubble off their fields as a matter of course. The man who tills the soil today no longer regards this as proper treatment of the soil which was formed by thousands of years of decaying vegetation including leaves from our valuable trews. We too can change. The village of Chester was delightful last fall because people found ways to take care of their leaves without burning them. The air was clear and there were no low-lying clouds of smoke to create traffic hazards. We respectfully request that you carefully And perspectively review this ordinance in order that you might find a better way to help the citizens with their leaf problems. - Mrs. L. Rnery Armstrong League of Women Voters Richmond Area Tuberculosis & Respiratory Disease Association 2315 MONUMENT AVENUE ❑ RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23220 ❑ TELEPHONE 355.4391 OFFICERS PRESIDENT WILLIAM A. BURRUSS VICE-PRESIDENT Statement on Proposed Leaf Burning Ordinance Chesterfield County June 13, 1973 DONALD L. BRUMMER, M.D. We fully appreciate the problem that leaf VICE-PRESIDENT disposal presents for many home owners. However, THE REVEREND WILLIAM E. KINSER In determiningthe course to be taken b the VICE-PRESIDENT y CHIEF EDGAR A. SHERRY community in the preparation of an ordinance, SECRETARY we want to urge that consideration be given to MRS. JOHN E. HALL, JR. the fact that leaf burning in congested areas ASSISTANT SECRETARY frequently adds to the suffering of patients MISS N. ELIZABETH WALLS with chronic respiratory diseases. In addition, TREASURER R. G. SCHNEIDER the combined effluent from burning the leaves of ASSISTANT TREASURER many households adds significantly to ambient THOMAS W. HERRMANN pollutant levels which should be kept as low as EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR possible. THOMAS O. MOAK, JR. Essentially, the proposed ordinance permits burning when leaf pickup is not available. If this ordinance is passed, every effort should be made to avoid generalized burning by at least providing pickup in areas of high population density. We would like to take this opportunity to urge citizens to use a conservative method of disposal of composting wherever possible. The Composting of leaves recycles and preserves nutrients while preventing the contamination of the air. Leaf burning is an unnecessary form of air pollution because of alternative disposal methods. It is one'of the few forms of pollution which can be easily controlled by the individual citizen. As we demand strong controls for industry and government, we also should exercise self discipline in the local community and prevent pollution for which we are directly responsible. Thomas 0. Moak, Jr. Executive Director Richmond Area Lung Association SERVING: Caroline, Charles City, Chesterfield, Goochland, Hanover, Henrico, King William, and New Kent Counties and the City of Richmond 50 Oo Ca `� 1 O� �f+ W N wo °1 N tv� C Lqw p w� ` Vs. NO w Z� o H H :D'�3' (D r F H vNi. O p p FJ• (D r I c r m e (D d (D F- � i R7C • (D � c) W P � It ) �c ct c r o m c* �' m m ct V r \ 1 -+ 1 upi c� y C7 iv � CD O� x (D 0 (D ct (D ti F ct ct ct Ct ct v Oq �, N• P (D y I7 F� (D y y N ct (D (D F$ F$ I-' N N FJ to y 7�d R• -nTdl �j R 1 m [off' O N N (D• N c-,crwU] F~ ll N 'f1 ZN CD W y 00 y ��'♦ rn y�y 4) (D �i i•-. C� C_ Q Q� O O N O y W O �I O ✓Y P. y ry (C, 1 � m� v y w r'x'i O O N Z >S >C ct C1 F- Q wC O t C ��p H izq b p N y W F$ ��+ N O N N nd Oq ch !� X01 (N•M 1. 0 V 1 1� i/� �,.v o y U 1 y o n • a � / /) y cG O O � F y w CD O cxt vO, 0 v CO to N O (n c� O O (D It o m H bi O N. � � A) P� (D (D 0 O P) (D y >C N F--� F- ct o • 51 O N• U1 ch (D Ol F' 1 F- Imo• P) ti iv y n N P- O'q (D -S CDy F� N• l�J y M70 O �, 7 w YV (D V J J C� (D V a V P. R� P. ty -:4 ct I n. O N ~ b ;:5 A) M❑ p cc y W Ornq (HD ¢ F I- pq N. W • /chi- U rFn�• (D O V �Z C� W 4v V yam' x y F-' U� ct F V n M' •C t4 V C CD M (D (D w ra F ❑ W N sF$ j Cp FG G N O I-$ A (DF• (D N N• � d Ir o �+ F-� ct � y (Dp ct W W� :sl -. $ sZ V F • ro > 00 b W • t4 CR y gym' �0 (D µ •s P•'O y .� c±. t. �e z R " rzCo. t y tv , �p r, ct 4 w o i O o a R. i tv a '2`, 9 W N• H Cti G c5 O _ H 0 A cl cl LCT� 3 o ars ' Q 0 = !~D m N w W tq 0 ti v � m y9 tl H o e 0~0 -4 o d� to ka tvo N N N m � p -N��1�1���1�1�1, '-IwINI� 't-- I-- 0 N ti O -- rbc o • F- ¢ �1 O \\ O O d t� � W W OJ n W Q o N >C Tj ~•~• F-' \O STI r.� OpN O y ct N W H V n O a (D �o C7 y y � w t 1 o w Hi CD�� O w O w 7(D N i m x an a n -� � H d s Q a 's b ew. � o � N CD Co o o v~i• c� r N• '-d CD Cn k1 SZco O n �l CZ w M C ch Cn N �• O � O d c I P) ct ch N ctO J \O F$ CD H � � b7 O y F -j (D CD FS O 10 V rnC co a' c -r L~ (D Cn . � C)C/1 IS' w ¢ 1 a' O • (D' N O 0 O N F -b ct H 1--1 C) 4_7 kp m 1 V to td t� F� o o o y r• bi m � o :� F 7 m o • in• ct � �D ��� mct N GQ (D o O CD O Faj V FS i V '�o N y CD F, d N• W Cn• F y y ray ..Y O CO y WCD N I G H O N fC C't • n \ F m V 1 , d CJ Cl)O H Ol Rl Vl fZ ch d P) O ��� y O y M 03 N N y F$ O O L 0 0 f z H tl F N � N p Po o • F- ¢ �1 O \\ O O � � W W OJ n W Q o N >C Tj O F-' \O STI r.� y� O y ct N W H V n O a (D �o F ul y y � w L] do s ym k � � +. o w Hi O w O w i� N i m x an a n -� � H d s Q a 's b ew. • N F N N O O p ct F- ¢ �1 O \\ O D N I OJ W m Q o N >C Tj O F-' \O STI CD y� O y ct N W H V n O a (D F ul y rV N• d N. L] do s ym k b Hi O N H i� N N n -� � H O O � b . • N CD d o o c� r N• '-d CD Cn k1 SZco O n �l CZ w M C y cD N �• O � O d c I P) ct ch N ctO J \O C� � � b7 N y (D CD FS O 10 V rnC co a' c -r (D Cn . � C)C/1 IS' w ¢ 1 �..D • • O N F -b ct ^ C) 4_7 kp m 1 V to V F� 1'r — y r• V M � o 7 ,,ocJ• O in• y y y mct N GQ C ^O O C� aP. '�o N• W Cn• Htd f° '-d WCD (D C't • f� ¢ V V y V W Ro H Ol Rl ct y y V CD W f z H W O nnC,, nn�,, CD t" W Cn nnom,, p) ti W Mhz '� a M� z� :0 W VF a n m m U) T� O m`1 m o C �7)$ O 1 C z C -L Cn V FS 0 (D D H chi- � N Q o N ( " CD y ct V (D rV N• V L] do s ym k b Hi rn �' tib 0. Fl t1#1 Dq b fir' O N• SZco O n <i'3 4v w M C F �t cD y y •i7 R y x O a ct cty V y tti PD PD D+ V n O N 0 f`�ft] N' CJ 4_7 kp m — � o y • td aP. 0 "3 o dr O tz 00 N I I c O CD w O PU p (D� ct(1)t CID N K H m � d� (D t-' t oP) o 0 ct P o� t--r� ::rl z I I c O CD w O PU (D� ct(1)t (D t-' t oP) o ct P cA cA b7 C) O R ¢ ( 0 U N (A ¢ ct c m (D �d o � 0 H ca O N O F- 0 a N N V ul o F„J <i • CDS O L 4v Iu'. lil O • � !� 0c) !" O (D P) O f- • P^) N V V i2 ct O1 .� O n• � bC N• v O o ct ' O O (D V O �mI h � O ( O VH I P) 0 O z a, Mug acl d td 3w �md n o ro t10 0 ct � ¢ z x o a P) m �$ ct 0 (D G f-3 x • (D rt A4 �3' O O r- 0 O ' $ 7yJ m cli N. Ro y ct V O y O C�" • m O d y N CD O 14 n (D tzJ M F -h O Y C U � W w cil m O W 00 I � a ❑ tytl et 01 ❑ M pMpi O dy' m10, m a t4 0 O a Wd� H m m m m Ctl �' El b CD o ro a a� in ry m to a r b H {� n A Ci 0 A Q Oq M M •ro N � m a a � o m � K RICHMOND NEWSPAPERS, INC. ♦ Publisher of RICHMOND TIMES -DISPATCH Richmond, Va........ 6/,6/73.................. _• � _ e1. N ti This is to certify that the attached.....L.1�....319:. Qq .................. was published in The Riclfmond Tides -Dispatch, a newspaper published in the City of Ric >#tond; 9t"e of Virginia. t ��t ............................................... ©f ..... 73 .......................... �,. 5/30/73 The first insertion being given... ......... .................... ........................... worn to and subscribed be ore me thisfA �733ry Public R QWENI f Virginia, City of Richmond: �c,,._, - z5 77 W., BLIE . issionexpires 2 / ................................................. TITLE i mm RICHMOND NVOS""Y"' f INC. Publisher of %►-- ►TC14 TIMES-'ISPA 1 E RICHMON 6/6/73.• ............ ond, V a .................. Riches legalp................ •............. ed.... ..a.•newsPaPer at the attach ....• Dispatch, certify th Times' Virginia - This is to ,rhe Richmond State of was Publishede City of Richmond. 6/6/rya published in 5/31/73 .................................. fj/31/ ....................... .. -ori. .�G insertion peva$ The first au scn a efore me worn to an UN i 1 W3 gQ this � - • - �. `. � public, �9•'' nota Y d, nia, City of Richmon State of V irB► -2/25/77 MY commission expires • TITLE— M T A K E N O T I C E M That the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County will, on Wednesday, 13 June, 1973, beginning at 2:30 P.M., in the County Board Room at Ches- terfield Courthouse, Virginia, take under consideration the rezoning and the granting of conditional uses on the parcels of land described herein. Copies of these amendments are on file in the Planning Department, Room 307, Office Building, Chesterfield Courthouse, Chesterfield, Virginia, for public examination between the hours of 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. of each regular business day. APPLICANT AND/OR AGENT MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARING All persons favoring or opposing the granting of the above requests are invited to appear at the time and place herein stated. Michael C. Ritz, Planning Director County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Bd. - June 13, 1973 73So63* In Dale Magisterial District J. Gilbert Ball requests the rezon- ing from Residential (R-2) to General Business (B-3) of a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 18.81 acres, fronting approximately 1000 ft. on Iron Bridge Road (Rt. 10), extending northwestwardly to a depth of approximately 1000 ft., and being located approximately 200 ft. northeast of the intersection of Iron Bridge Road and Canasta Drive. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 66-1 (1) parcel 3 (Sheet No. 22). 72-119C In Bermuda Magisterial District Castle Park Systems, Inc. re- quests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) and Light Industrial (M-1) to 3 Mobile Home Park (MH -1) and Heavy Industrial (M-3) of various parcels of Q land fronting approximately 1000 ft. on Meadowville Road (Rt.618), extend- ing southeastwardly approximately 5000 ft. to an approximate 700 ft. x frontage on Bermuda Hundred Road (Rt. 697), and being located approxi - E -4 mately one mile northeast of the intersection of the aforementioned roads. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 118 (1) parcels 5 & 6; Sec. 118-15 (1) parcel 2 (Sheet 13)• 735059 In Bermuda Magisterial District Vance -Barker request the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-2) of a parcel of land of irregu- lar shape, containing 39.75 acres, fronting in the north approximately 1200 ft. on Rt. 620, also fronting in the south approximately 2400 ft. on Ramblewood Drive (Rt. 617), and being located approximately 800 ft. east of the intersection of Lawing Drive and Route 620. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 134-2 (1) parcel 2 and part of parcel 6 (Sheet No. 42). 73SO73 In Clover Hill Magisterial District Lone Star Properties, Inc. requests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-2) and Townhouse for sale (R-7) two parcels of land of irregular shape, contain- ing 304 acres, fronting approximately 1500 ft. on Newby's Bridge Road (Rt. 649), and being located approximately 1800 ft. south of the inter- section of Newby's Bridge Road and Walmsley Blvd. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 51-1 (1) parcels 1 & 2 and 40-13 (1) parcel 8-1 (Sheet No. 15). 735074 In Bermuda Magisterial District Day Realty of Richmond, Inc. requests the rezoning from Residential (R-2) to General Business (B-3) of a parcel of land of rectangular shape, containing 5.72 acres, front- ing approximately 700 ft. on Pams Avenue, extending eastwardly to a depth of approximately 400 ft., and being located approximately 200 ft. north of the intersection of Pams Avenue and Willis Road (Rt. 613). Refer to Tax Map Sec. 82-5 (3) lots 10, 11, 11A, 12A, 12B & 12C, Kings- land Heights (Sheet 23). 73SO75 In Matoaca Magisterial District J. Gray Spain requests the rezon- ing from Agricultural (A) to General Industrial (M-2) of a parcel of land of rectangular shape, containing 3.58 acres, fronting approximately 320 ft. on Happy Hill Road (Rt. 619), extending westwardly to a depth of approximately 400 ft., and being located approximately 1700 ft. northeast of the intersection of Happy Hill Road and Jefferson Davis Highway (Rt. 1/301). Refer to Tax Map Sec. 163-3 (1) parcel 10 (Sheet 49). *This case was deferred by the Board of Supervisors at a previous meeting to their June 13, 1973 meeting. Bd. - June 13, 1973 ?3SO76 In Bermuda Magisterial District E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co. (Inc.) requests a Conditional Use to operate byproduct gypsum outside storage on part of two parcels of land of irregular shape, containing 485 acres, fronting approximately 2700 ft. on Bellwood Road (Rt. 656), and being located approxi- mately 1 mile east of the Bellwood Road and Route I-95 underpass. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 68-7 (1) parcel 1 and 68-10 (1) parcel 2 (Sheet 23). 73SO77 The Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County requests the follow- ing changes in the Zoning Districts Maps of Chesterfield County: A. In Matoaca Magisterial District establish a Zoning District boundary line along the east line of Lot 14, the alley easement between lots 6 & 15, and the east line of lot 6 in Block F of Laurel Branch Farms. Refer to Tax Map 182-9 (3) Blk. 1, lots 6, 7, 14 & 15. B. In Matoaca Magisterial District rezone from B-2 Community Business to B-3 General Business parcels known as Tax Map 181-12 (4) lots 16, 19 & 19A and Tax Map 182-9 (2) lot 18. C. In Midlothian Magisterial District rezone from R-2 Residential to B-2 Community Business parcels known as Tax Map 15-12 (2), parcels 8, 8-1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and that part of parcel 9 south of a line extended from the northeast corner of parcel 8 to the northwest corner of parcel 14. D. In Bermuda Magisterial District rezone from A Agricultural to M-1 Light Industrial a parcel known as Tax Map 116-12 (2) 5. E. In Matoaca Magisterial District rezone from B-2 Community Business to A Agricultural part of a parcel known as Tax Map 181-1 (1) 5• F. In Matoaca Magisterial District rezone from A Agricultural to B-2 Community Business a part of a parcel known as Tax Map 181-1 (1) 6 being 200 feet by 200 feet and including 5309 Hickory Road. G. In Midlothian Magisterial District rezone from R-1 Residential to B-1 Convenience Business a parcel known as Tax Map 10-2 (1) 8. H. In Matoaca Magisterial District rezone from B-2 Community Business to B-3 General Business a part of a parcel known as 163-3 (1) 2. I. In Matoaca Magisterial District rezone from A Agricultural to B-3 General Business a parcel known as Tax Map 181-8 (1) 3-1. MOBILE HOMES 73SO78 Bermuda District Kenneth R. Snodgrass Located at 2900 Kingsland Road. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 81-3 (1) parcel 11 (Sheet 23). 73SO79 Bermuda District Roland D. Stokes, Jr. Located at 9920 Jean Drive. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 82-10 (2) lot 5, Jean Court (Sheet 23). T A K E N O T I C E That the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County will, on Wednesday, 13 June 1973, beginning at 2:30 P.M., in the County Board Room at Ches- terfield Courthouse, Virginia, take under consideration an ordinance to amend the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, Chapter 17 of the Code of Chesterfield County, Virginia to add to Section 17-1 the following: 11(66) Mobile Homes subject to a mobile home permit from the Board of Supervisors," and to add to Section 21-1 the following: 11(24) Mobile Homes subject to a mobile home permit from the Board of Supervisors." Copies of these amendments are on file in the Planning Department, Room 307, Office Building, Chesterfield Courthouse, Chesterfield, Virginia, for public examination between the hours of 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. of each regular business day. All persons favoring or opposing the granting of the above requests are invited to appear at the time and place herein stated. Michael C, Ritz, Planning Director County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia T A K E N 0 T I C E That the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County will, on Wednesday, 13 June 1973s beginning at 2:30 P.M., in the County Board Room at Ches- terfield Courthouse, Virginia, take under consideration an ordinance to amend the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, Chapter 17 of the Code of Chesterfield County, Virginia, providing for treatment of common areas and the ownership of property proposed for townhouse development specifically that Chapter 17, Article 10, Section 10-17 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, be amended and reordained to read as follows: SECTION 10-17. Common Areas and Ownership of Property. In the event common areas are provided which are not contained in lots or streets conveyed to individual owners said common areas shall be maintained by and be the sole responsibility of the developer -owner of the townhouse development until such time as the developer -owner conveys such common area to a non-profit corporate owner whose members shall be all of the individual owners of townhouses in the townhouse development or to a non-profit council of co-owners as provided under Title 55-79.1 et seq of the Code of Virginia (1950)2 as amended (Horizontal Property Act). Said land shall be conveyed to and be held by such non-profit corporate owner or such non-profit council of co-owners solely for recreational and parking purposes of the owners of the individual townhouse lots in such townhouse development. In the event of such conveyance by the development -owner to a non-profit corporate owner, deed restrictions and covenants, in form and substance satisfactory to the Commonwealth's Attorney of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, shall provide, among other things, that any assessments, charges and costs of the maintenance of such common areas shall constitute a pro -rata lien against the individual townhouse lots, inferior in lien and dignity only to taxes and bonafide duly recorded deeds of trust on each townhouse lot. An applicant, seeking to subject property to townhouse development under this article whose ownership or interest in the property is held by a valid lease, shall provide for an initial term of not less than five hundred (500) years in such lease. This Ordinance shall be of full forcement and effect upon its passage as provided by law. Copies of this amendment are on file in the Planning Department, Room 307, Office Building, Chesterfield Courthouse, Chesterfield, Virginia, for public examination between the hours of 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. of each regular business day. All persons favoring or opposing the granting of the above request are invited to appear at the time and place herein stated. Michael C. Ritz, Planning Director County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia M M PLANNING COMMISSION AND PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS & REPORTS FOR REZONING AND CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTS to be heard by the CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Wednesday, June 13, 1973 73SO63 J. Gilbert Ball DEFERRED CASES Dale Magisterial District Tax Map Sec. 66-1 (1) Parcel.. 3 (Sheet 22) Request to rezone from Residential (R-2) to General Business (B-3). This case was deferred from the Board's May 9, 1973, meeting in order to allow the applicant an opportunity to pursue amending his request to seek rezoning to the agricultural classification and a Conditional Use for the operation of a funeral home. As of this writing, no such amended request has been received by the Planning office. General Plan: Single family residential Planning Commission recommendation: DENIAL All -vote aye. REZONING AND CONDITIONAL USES 73SO59 Vance -Barker Bermuda Magisterial District Tax Map Sec. 134-2 (1) parce'. 2 and pt. of parcel 6 (Sheet 42) Request to rezone from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-2). General Plan: Planning Commission recommendation: 73SO73 Lone Star Properties, Inc. Vacant/Agricultural APPROVAL All vote aye. Clover Hill Magisterial District Tax Map Sec. 51-1 (1) parcels 1 & 2 (Sheet 15) Request to rezone from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-2) and Townhouse for Sale (R-7). General Plan: Residential/Agricultural Planning Commission recommendation: APPROVAL All vote aye except Mr. Hawkins who abstains. M M 73S07�4 ,Day Realty of Richmond, Inc. Bermuda Magisterial District Tax Map See. 82-5 (3) lots }, 10,11,11A,12A,12B & 12C2 Kingsland Heights (Sheet 23) Request to rezone from Residential (R-2) to General Business (B-3). General Plan: Planning Commission recommendation: Commercial development APPROVAL SUBJECT TO A 50 FT. BUFFER A RMITTED IN SEC. 24-3-4 ALONG THE WEST AND NOS—PROPERTY IN All vote aye. 73SO75 J. Gray Spain Matoaca Magisterial District Tax Map Sec. 163-3 (1) parcel 10 (Sheet 49) Request to rezone from Agricultural (A) to General Industrial (M-2). General Plan: Planning Commission recommendation: 73SO76 E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. Commercial development APPROVAL All vote aye. Bermuda Magisterial District Tax Map Sec. 68-7 (1) parcel 1; 68-10 (1) parcel 2 (Sheet 23) Request is for a Conditional Use to allow by-product gypsum storage. General Plan: Industrial development Planning Commission recommendations: APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall provide an accurate account of the drainage situation showing existing drainage and the impact this project will have on the site and the sur- rounding area. The applicant shall submit such a plan to the County Engineering Department which will provide for on and off site drainage control. The plan shall explain the methods and show the facilities to be utilized in the hydraulic engineering of this project. This plan Phall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to the applicant beginning any storage operation. 2. The applicant shall submit a plan for erosion and sediment control the the County Engineering Department. Such a plan is to be comprised of vegetative and engineering practices (as outlined in the "Erosion and Sediment 2' - • Control Technical Handbook" published b► the James River Soil and Water Conservation District) to be utilized as erosion and sediment control measures for the project. The plan shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to beginning any storage operation. 3. No waste other than gypsum shall be deposited. 4. The top surface shall be covered with compacted soil upon completion of the filling of each cell. 5. The applicant shall establish background levels for calcium and sulfate and the runoff from the fill area and monitor the runoff for both constituents throughout the disposal operation. 6. All storage shall occur in no other area than that indicated on the composite map marked and dated 4/18/73 and submitted with the Conditional Use application. 7. The height of the gypsum storage shall not exceed the total height of the natural bluff adjacent to the storage area. 8. Within 1 year of the cessation of this storage operation the ground area shall be reclaimed sufficiently enough to permit natural growth. All vote aye. 73SO77 Board of Supervisors, Chesterfield County Request changes by Planning Staff in certain Zoning Districts Maps of Chesterfield County. Planning Commission recommendation: APPROVAL All vote aye. MOBILE HOMES 73SO78 Kenneth R. Snodgrass Bermuda Magisterial District Tax Map Sec. 81-3 (1) parcel 11 (Sheet 23) Health Department approves connecting trailer to existing septic tank gystem for a period not to exceed two years. The mobile home will be parked on property belonging to 0. Lucas, friend of applicant. Adjacent property owners state no objection to this request. 7 S0�79 Roland D. Stokes, Jr. Bermuda Magisterial District Tax Map Sec. 82-10 (2) lot 5, Jean Court (Sheet 23) The Health Department reports favorable conditions for installation of a subsurface drainfield. The mobile home will be parked on prop- erty belonging to James Carey, Jr., friend of the applicant. Adjacent property owners state no objection to this request which is for 2 years. Res- ectfully submitted, Stanley`"R. Balderson, Jr. - 3 - Chief Planner Crasttr Vark #ystrims, 34 nr. 30 Perimeter Park Drive Atlanta, Georgia 30341 ON Telephone (404) 457-4395, 458-9915 May 18, 1973 Mr. Michael C. Ritz, Secretary Chesterfield County Planning Commission Chesterfield County Courthouse Chesterfield, Virginia Re Zoning Petition #72-119C Dear Mr. Ritz: Based upon the recommendation of the Chesterfield County Planning Commission, we have decided to withdraw our application on this particular case. We plan to re -apply for a multi -use zoning on the property in the very near future. We are presently contacting adjacent property owners to obtain their ideas on what the highest and best use of this property would be. Thank you for your coopera- tion. We have sent copies of this letter to all those parties listed below who are adjacent property owners Sincere�y, l� t n c .t. Robert T. Love Vice President -Operations RTL : j p Attachment , Charles C. and 2 Route 2, Box 8T Chester, Virgin: Mercer P. - Faw as Route 3, Box 30 Chester, Virgin: Robert S. and C 700 Bermuda Hun, Chester, Virgin. Mamie J. Futch 3100 Freeman St Hopewell, Virgi: William T. Moor 307 St. David's Richmond, Virgi Mildred P. Payn Route 2, Box 10 Chester, Virgin Charlie Palmer Route 2, Box 10 Chester, Virgin W. G. and Virgi o FOR OFFICE USE ONLY *Board= of Supervisors +� *Board of Zoning: AopeYl—s- ---------- 77 1S Case No. Cr r *Plann. ng Commission Fee Recelnt o. r Y X791 w, *Defered to t v y Deferred to Deferred to )APPLICATION TO THE CiESTERFIE.LD COUNTY E30ARD OF SUPERVISORS 0 BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS R INFOR-MATIOii SNA.LL 9E TYn7n OR RRIATED AND COMPLETU EXPLAIN FULLY THE REQUEST DESIRED r A)REZONING Parcel A From ) TO MH1) NAP1E (Industrial) NO . NA1�4E l Pare. e s B and C From Ag7riculturp To MH1 Paxce D From A ricultureTo Industrial (M) ORDINANCE SECTION '• A) NAME OF APPLICANT: Castle Park Systems, Inc, B) MAILING ADDRESS : c/o Tho�rnas, Jennings arle ax G) TELEPHONE NO .: y, e s er ie Va. . D) NA14E OF PRESENT OWNER OF PROPERTY 0I4 WHICH THIS REQUEST 'WILL OCCUR :Parcel A Estate of L. R, Goyne, D. W. Murphey, Executor E) MAILING ADDRESS gree s , - F} TELEPHONE N0. 7nnninoc R__�i +�ip�V y Cll�f,te fie VII'y�1]3'� 748-2277 G NAME OF PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: ThQxnas. Jennings & Farley H )' ADDRESS: B X_145 Chesterfield Vir I) TELEPHONE NO.:1Q 2 7 8-2277 3 IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QUES�tPy �,•� EXPLAIN: (Copy of pending contract or option agreement.shg ��'�,,. be attached hereto and made a �`�`��S +a part of this ap'Executor �f estate o plication.) (Parcel A) Co Y of affidavit of existence of contract b Exec :f L:'�,�aytt�► (PaC D C of contract herewith • LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION (Following; information to, be obtained from the Office of the County Assessor) J A) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Bermuda ' B) TAX MAP NO. C) SEC. NO. 11$ D)SUBDIVISZON N0. F) LOT OR PARCEL NO G)StRLET ADDRESS E}BLOCK N0. H) SOURCE OF TITLE FOR AL PROPERTIES INVOLVE PAGE B, C, D Deedr Book 4150 page 384, A PLAT OF THIS PROPERTY SHALL 5E' ATTACHED HERETO All "�I;DE A Pl`,R APPLIC�',TI0P1 Sji0`11RG THE LOCATIO'sl 13Y RFFEREPICE TO NEAREST ROAD, I NTERSECT� f IOP AND TILE . D I;`iE,,SS.IOFtS OF SITE, E) PROPERTY OWNER'S NX4Z : William T. Moore mA LING ADDRESS: 307 St. David's Lane, Richmond, Va. 23221 TAX MAP NO.: 113 -1 SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: i3LOCK: SECTION: F) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Mildred P. Payne MAILING ADDRESS .# Route 2, Box 1000, Chester, Va. 23831 TAX MAP NO,: 118-4 SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCE : SEC G) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Charlie Palmer and Bettie Bruce Wooten MAILING ADDRESS: Route 2, Box 1002, Chester, Va. 23831 TAX MAP NO.: 11.8-3 SUBD. NAME: ; LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: 1i) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: W. G. and Virgie M. Mitchell MAILING ADDRESS: Route 3, Box 310 Chester. Va 32 831 TAX MAP NO.: 118-6-1 SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: I) PROPERTYOWNER' S NAME: Charles Edward and Barbara Lou McClem MAILING ADDRESS : Route 2, Box 879, Chester, Va. 23831 TAX MAP NO. 118-6-3 SUBD. NAME: ` LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK_: SECTION:: 3) PROPERTY OWNER'S 'ME : Morgan A. Reynolds MAILING ADDRESS: c/o John D. Elliott, 1020 Euclid Avenue, Charlotte, N. C TAX MAP NO.: 100-1 SUBD. NAME: 28203 LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: K) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAE MAILING ADDRESS: TAX PAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: L) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS; TAX MAP NO. SUBD., NAME; LOT 'or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: y. LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: N) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE USE.THE BACK OF PAGES 3 &41, r .7 4 1©) THE APPLICANq' HEREWITii THE FEE REQUIRED. A SCHEDULE IS 4 AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPAR71ENT, P00f+ 307. 21) CHECK OR !MONEY ORDER ^^UST 31; .,1ADE PAYABLE, TO: TREASURER, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD.` r 12) IfWE HEREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ANY EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE. October 24 197 2 i P Castle Park Systems, Inc. By SIGNATURE OF, AGENT SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT (Name of person other than, but (Same name as used in item 2-A, actin; for the applicant,, filling; page 1) out all or a vert of this arpli- cation) SUBSCRIBED AND S14ORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 24th DAY OF October �9? 2 . MY COMMISSION EXPIRES January. 31 193: { NOTARY 4 r � b k✓ a itfi— '' v ae J 4 r ,'�1 nui u Z i"ter ;���i,. ,;. :� ', �of 3f •X iE iE iE " i'x ..: -r.. :# ':t fiE iF !f �! X :� '.�C � if FOR USE G1Vs.,�" x Supervisors Case iJo.WSU.r`.w A. of Zoning Appeals Fee Receipt J•xo . . �> 'fit <'APFLZCAT ON TO TJIE CHESTF,RFZELD COUNTY BOARD Or SU��ERVI;SORS 01P, BOARD= OF ZONING . x_ ,. FOLLOWING IPJFOR�4A'FION SFi�t°L:L BE 7'XPED OR 1'x1'I:3 AI 4 .' LAIN `FULLY THE.. REQUEST 'DESTRFM A RE"01,� ING , From Y ToF , , Type of use(s) proposed: B) CONDITIONAL USE: C) VAR A n 4 ji D) SPECIAL E CEPTI ON : �} . 20 A) , NAME OF APPLICANT: E.".I 01j POI: DE NEN((lJZ & Co.,(in ) -S) MAILING ADDR.E& , x.438 t hmond 232 0 E W,D) E OF FRES NT, OWNE F PR ' 'TYOEW-Cif THIS RBQUES OCCUR: (Same a9 Above) r t y EE) MAILING DRESS F r 'IMP90NE NO N G) NAME Or, PERSON TO BE _ OTIFIED IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER: A, Sinnickson.,1Plant 14angarAt ADDRESS: 1. I TELE PNO'.2748 ]C '3. IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QV$ST1bN EXPLAIN • (A C r of p'6hdin� � ri�r tract option agree�n t "{ a< tri atter horteto and made.all y{.g t 6'f this a p c � s . i k. �g F t6CATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION - i4, .. (Following 'information shall be obtairldd from the ' }: T Office of the County Assessor, Room 213) k Bermuda, 4. A) MAGISTERIAL DISTRTCT_M§rtct i _,__B) TAX MAP NO.� 3 d) SEI;. NO, D) ,S BDIVISION NO. E BLO K O.r_..:.._.. „M j_, F) LOT OR `PARCEL -NO . G) STREET DKESS� -H) SOURCE OF TITLE FQR ALL 't PERTIES INVOLVED Dr K E PAGE (For Salan�e o his nfo tfo s o t i rra see in ert $►beet I A, n x� 4. 'Location of Property in Question: A) Magisterial District: Bermuda, District 1 B) Tax Maps Nos. 68 68 C) Section Nos. 7 10 F) Parcel Nos. (1) 1 (1) 2 6) Street Address: Bellwood Road, East of Route 1 H).Source of Title for All Properties.Involved: Property No. Deed Book Page No. 2088 299 137 2089 299 133 2090 298 307 2091 298 311 2092 298 310 2093 298 312 2094 298 308 2095 298 313 2108 315 237 3594 1002 322 - 1-A - ST.�!TE mf? i . ;.^:C1?�! ` R THIS REQL1.2S7'',�_.�aee At-- _ ?E dE is � � # •i # # �' iE � ., STATE HOW iai:iS REQUEST. WILL NOT BE MA^ERIPA,LY DETRIMENTAL TO THE 'ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS OR THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD: W'y� e r " '�(+� P`AIN Am . Y EXI�I'Z�tG USE'' ,P�RMiT„-u�PEC2AL �XCEPTI�N', ;Ct�NT�ITT£�IA*.i xk� " VARIANCE GRANTED PREVfi(CTSLY ON' THE PARCEL` IN 'dd"ES'ION :- :• lone 8. A) EXISTING LAND USE (S) cap , �� a! o P1 aunt B) ZXIST ING STRUCTURE(S::None_on C)- EXISTIR.G Z'00146: D) TOTAL ACREAGt OF THE RE T: ES0 Acres within our 5 Acres tact ` 9, GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT, ACROSS THE ROAD OR 14106 1AY AND . ` FACING THE PROPEWY AND.ANY OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RICHT-OF-WAS:s' PROM SUfiH PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT.THE PROPERTY AFFECTED I$;;.SITUATED AT OR WITHIN 104 FEET OF `,THE INTERSECTION OF ,ANY WC OR 'Mdft RFJO , ., , ti OR HIGHWAYS, AT OR WITHIN ONE'HUNDRED FEED OF THE NTERSEC q, ON'v ROAD OR HIGHWAY WITH A RAILROAD RIGHT—QF—WAY. OR 'AT OR W TRZI�'r ,r " ONE HUNDi b FEET --bF THE INTERSECTION OF THE, RIGHT-OF-WAYS Off', A)n z - RAILROADS , GIVE AiME.S OF PROPERTYOWNERS AT ° ALL 'CORNERS OFA `- SUCH INTERSECTION. (Fol�owinE information MUST BE obtained by t'�� applicant from the office of the County Assessor,, Room 213). A) PROPERTY OWNER' S NAML:, -MAIL114G ADDRESS:, T y TAX MAP NO. SUB. 'N ME LOT or PARC :„(See nsert BLOC : SE ON : Sheet +3,`Frovided- byte Mesio s Off ice) :'b) PROPERTY OWNa I S NAME MAILING ADDRESS,*. TAX ASAP NO• SUED.' NAME: LOT or -P A.ctCEL BLOCK, TION ., ,FROf'ERTY, OWNER IS NAME: `MAILING ADDRESS:.., TO MAP NO.: ` : SU -M. N tM r ' LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: D) PROPERTY OWNER ° S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: _ TAX MAP NO.: - SUBD . NAME: LOT or PARCEL BLOCK SECTION: .l€, P;fI rr s,,.ys€�� w Subject Propert (68-7) (1) 1, (68 - 10) .2 (68-13)(1) 3 (Can't locate) (68-6)(2) 17 Arthur Shoosmith, Jr. 6 Harry T. $ 6020 Jefferson DAvis Hwy. (68-10)(2) 17B Richmond, Va. 23234 (68-10)(2) 17A James P. Dillard 1300 Bellwood Road Richmond, Va. 23234 (68-10)(2) 15B William D. Cole $ Jo Ann M. 21400 Robertson Ave. EXINKINIXXX Petersburg, Va. (68-6)(2) 14A,lSA C. E. Featherston 1823 N. Hamilton St. Richmond, Va. (68-6) (2) 13-14-15 James L. `,%Wade 1500 Bellwood Road Richmond, Va. (68-5)(2) 11,12 Northwest Corp: & P.O. .Box 5185 (68-9)(2) 10 Richmond, Va. 23220 (68-9)(2) 1 Curtis, Virginia Farrow 1192S Airlea Drive Nakesville, Va. 22123 (68-13)(2) Herbert J. Bond $ Mary Lou C. 15,16,17,18 8407 Haven Ave Richmond, Va. 23234 (68-15)(1) 1 Lone Star Industries Inc. P.O. Box 420 Norfolk, Va. 23501 (68-13)(2) 0. B. Cross 51,71,106 Glen Allen, Va. 39 If3�� .T IE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE FEE REQUIRED. A FEE SCHEnUtE S AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, ROOM . # A 11)," CHECK OR MONEY ORDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO: (Check # 393Q , $75.00) x 'TREASURER, COUNTY OF,CHESTERFIELD. H ~ A P r: °':12)" ENCLLOSI WITH` THIS, APPLICATIOiV EITHER THE APPROPRfATE CO,U)nY TAX, MAP '.& OR A S'MVEYED PLAT OF THE ENTIRE ' PARCEL. (See Exhibit i) .` r w ;ENCL031 WITH, THIS APPL1,4PATION ANY PERTINENT SITE 'PLANS AQR: ° NTA FLATS. (See - Exfii bi t 1)t �f NOTE: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS MAY DELAY THE SCHEDULING OF REQUESTS: 14) 1/14E HERE13Y DEPOSE AND. SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOTTE I,TATEKEN'TS AND STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ANY EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE: Apri l.° 23, 197 3rR E. I. DU PONTDE NEMOURS & CO. (SNC ,. r�ickson, Punt Mat &#er 8y: A Sin " 4 ,rO 0 y SIGNATURE ' v ; ( e of person othe than, but (Sartre name as used 3n Itek arA acting for the appl cant, filling Page I) out all or a part of'this appli- cation) % SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN ,TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF MY COMMISSION EXPIRES. 19?b' ry =4 K f•k X:s NOTARY -*c `s ,W'` I✓ ar, ti;; ' ' aW ti+ , y, t —4— - x , 1 ' : "t ` A y e ,. r^t; ": '3 • % �. a a "'K'+': �., 1 hur�° a at, a a�w T "s ¢ "�.✓ � a+n - 9 � }a, r, S ffi° $ r :k""f"i,Sr "! _ p ATTACHMENT A Page 1 of 2 April 23, 1973 CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION BYPRODUCT GYPSUM STORAGE E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO., (INC.) JAMES RIVER PLANT KELLWOOD, CHESTERFIELD CO., VIRGINIA S. REASON FOR THIS S REQUEST: Long-range planning is in progress for new industrial fibers products, which might involve the DuPont plants in Chesterfield County. Planning studies have reached the stage where we must establish a firm basis for permanent disposal of low intrinsic value solid byproduct, calcium sulfate. In its naturally occurring form, calcium sulfate is known.as gypsum. Large deposits occur throughout the world.-1 Initial operation of this storage is targeted for,1975. The disposal area is on low-lying land within the plant site deemed unsuitable for.manufacturing activi- ties. The estimated life of the proposed initial disposal area -is five years. Additional storage area to the northwest can be assigned later if expansion becomes necessary. The disposal area is east of and abuts a 30400t high bluff. The gypsum will be deposited in 400.' x 300' blocks up to but not above the bluff top elevation. It is not intended to cover the storage. (Although. pure gypsum is white, other by-, product gypsum piles have tended to acquire a gray -green appearance from weathering). The high land .area immediately to the west will be used for equipment to distribute material onto the active storage block. An application has been made to the State Health Depart*ent .for a permit under their Solid Waste 'Regulations. We, expect favorable -action: We are exploring reclaim possibilities, but it is already evident that none are likely to mature until at least several years after the start of the storage. Thus we must have the ability to deposit this byproduct in a permanent storage area., ATTACHMENT A Page 2 of 2 6. NON -DETRIMENTAL ASPECTS OF REQUEST: e Calcium sulfate/gypswrr is an inoffensive natural material - White, crystalline solid - Odorless, non-toxic - Essentially dust -free - Slightly soluble to water (0.25% max.) • The operation will be conducted in the interior of a large industrial plant tract at least one-half mile from any habitation, and minimum noise generation is expected. It should not be offensive in this regard. • Minimum visibility - Not visible from adjacent properties on west bank of James River e Build no higher than natural bluff e Screened by standing trees immediately to south and along property line on northwest Perspective from nearest point on east bank of James River ( mile distant) Horizontal - 30o angle subtended . ..• Vertical - 00-35' angle subtended 9 Bellwood Road traffic non-interference The operating round-the-clock, not more than three additional persons/.shift would be employed Several material delivery options are under study; the most likely are non - highway modes Bd. - June 13, 1973 73SO76 In Bermuda Magisterial District E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co. (Inc.) requests a Conditional Use to operate byproduct gypsum outside storage on part of two parcels of land of irregular shape, containing 485 acres, fronting approximately 2700 ft. on Bellwood Road (Rt. 656), and being located approxi- mately 1 mile east of the Bellwood Road and Route I-95 underpass. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 68-7 (1) parcel 1 and 68-10 (1) parcel 2 (Sheet 23). 73SO77 The Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County requests the follow- ing changes in the Zoning Districts Maps of Chesterfield County: A. In Matoaca Magisterial District establish a Zoning District boundary line along the east line of Lot 14, the alley easement between lots 6 & 15, and the east line of lot 6 in Block F of Laurel Branch Farms. Refer to Tax Map 182-9 (3) Blk. 1, lots 6, 7, 14 & 15. B. In Matoaca Magisterial District rezone from B-2 Community Business to B-3 General Business parcels known as Tax Map 181-12 (4) lots 16, 19 & 19A and Tax Map 182-9 (2) lot 18. C. In Midlothian Magisterial District rezone from R-2 Residential to B-2 Community Business parcels known as Tax Map 15-12 (2), parcels 81 8-12 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and that part of parcel 9 south of a line extended from the northeast corner of parcel 8 to the northwest corner of parcel 14. D. In Bermuda Magisterial District rezone from A Agricultural to M-1 Light Industrial a parcel known as Tax Map 116-12 (2) 5. E. In Matoaca Magisterial District rezone from B-2 Community Business to A Agricultural part of a parcel known as Tax Map 181-1 (1) 5• F. In Matoaca Magisterial District rezone from A Agricultural to B-2 Community Business a part of a parcel known as Tax Map 181-1 (1) 6 being 200 feet by 200 feet and including 5309 Hickory Road. G. In Midlothian Magisterial District rezone from R-1 Residential to B-1 Convenience Business a parcel known as Tax Map 10-2 (1) 8. H. In Matoaca Magisterial District rezone from B-2 Community Business to B-3 General Business a part of a parcel known as 163-3 (1) 2. I. In Matoaca Magisterial District rezone from A Agricultural to B-3 General Business a parcel known as Tax Map 181-8 (1) 3-1. MOBILE HOMES 73SO78 Bermuda District Kenneth R. Snodgrass Located at 2900 Kingsland Road. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 81-3 (1) parcel 11 (Sheet 23). 73SO79 Bermuda District Roland D. Stokes, Jr. Located at 9920 Jean Drive. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 82-10 (2) lot 5, Jean Court (Sheet 23). '•. MAY 1 X73 U'r51E5�'t�� COJNTY For OffUse Only: ase No. 7 3 50 7 Zoning o�--� )7 V A P P L I C A `�'g�Fjjj\ "OR A USE PERMIT T O P A R M 0 B I L E H 0 M E (NEW ND RENEWAL) (Following in on is to be typed or printed) 1. Name of Applicant: K R rA R E J hi aC1 01- V - (Must be owner & occupant of the Mobile Home ���s�e Q�VA• 2. Address of Applicant I'�aU1 fie- 0 S tkuJyTelephone�1�)©i 3. Mailing address where mobile home will be located Wes Lpk Rich vNA' v *Magisterial District � �i� ��jy�r� /�.—Tax Map N, -3/ Subd. Name Lot or Parcel__Z� Blk. Sec. A map of this property must be attached to this application. This map must be to scale. 4. Name of owner of property on which mobile home will be parked If the applicant isn of the owner of the property in ques ion, explain.) 5. If mobile home will remain unoccupied, explain 6. Time requested for mobile home to remain at site (use permit granted for a maximum of two years only.) months years 7. Size and type of mobile home to be parked on the above noted property. Make Igewooq-� Model to Color � ll-�CgWidth )a F+. Length No. of Bedrooms 7 & O_No. of Bathrooms 0__N 8. Source of water supply C C, Method of sewage disposal 12 �"�� c At k Information obtainable from the office of the County Assessor. (Room 213) 9. Information, addresses, and signatures of all property owners,occupants who are adjacent to the parcel on which the mobile home be located must be provided in the spaces below. We, the undersigned owners and occupants of the adjacent property to the property on which a mobile home is proposed to be located, hereby certify that we do or do not object to the granting of a Use Permit to park a mobile home on the property described in this petition. Information available from the office of the County Assessor (Room 213). Name (print)/�ri'1rj� r✓ 'tf �fvll�'1�_f Owner ( ) Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. OV/' r�l Block No. Lot or Parcel No. Address SCday Check One Only I do object I do of object Signature: Name (print) Owner Occupant Tax Map No. o Block No. Lot or Parcel No. Address: T� �C//,� e �t.r�f'� X -e 1h I do object � '► !' OMM Name (print) Tax Map No. Address: I do object Signature: Check One Only I do n t j e ct caner { ) Occupant ( ) -4.__„_ Lor or Parcel No. Check One On Additional spaces on back of page. (2) not object Name (print) Pl��li't�1G� �` - (� Owner ( ) Occupant ( ) p Tax Map No. Block No. _ Lot or Parcel No. Address --o ,5-_s �,l��nor /.� _-2 -;� z Check One Only I do object I do not object Signature: Name (prin Owner ( ) Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. �c7 Address: c7 '✓ Z 7` Block No. Lot or Parcel No. Check One Onl I do object I do not object Signature: Name (print) Owner ( ) Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. Block No. Lot or Parcel No. Address: Check One Only I do object I do not object Signature: Name (print) Owner ( ) Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. Block No. Lot or Parcel No. Address: Check One Only I do object ( ) I do not object Signature: (3) M 10. THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE SUM OF FORTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($45.00) TO BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION TO ASSIST IN DEFRAYING THE COST OF PROCESSING THE SAME. A) Check or money order must be made payable to: Treasurer, County of Chesterfield B) Application fee ($45.00) is not refundable. 11. The Chesterfield County Health Department must make an inspection of the proposed or existing mobile home location site (both new & renewal). It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the Health Department and make an appointment for this inspection (telephone 748-1398). The inspection form must be attached to this application. 12. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING UNLESS OR UNTIL: A) All questions have been answered B) Location map or plat is attached C) Health Department inspection form attached D) Application is signed and notarized. THE APPLICANT AND/OR HIS AGENT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE BOARD HEARING. I/We hereby certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any exhibits transmitted herewith are true. Subscribed and sworn to befo My Commission expires me this day of, ,H 7-C M. ) / S - q 7 � (Page 4) (Notary Public 197j_. ek n % � CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _ CHESTERPIELD, VIRGINIA. Request for Lot Evaluation i ror: rpplicant Q. Addressae,,, Phone -7 / `lam f v i1 Owner Address Phonci Exact Location of Premises % .¢14 Lot Brockec�£fon street sub v s ion Applicant /� Desires to have a lot opinion that is subject to re - EVALUATION prior to issuance of Building Permit, L% Is applying for Building Permit Type of Construction �,~ /% Dwelling /% Otbert g -1q ltd /% House plan not final Zy Auto. Washer /�'7' Garbage Disposal /J?7 Public water /']' Ind. well Actual or potential bedroom P Estimated water consumption — gpd. Soil Study: Recommendations: Based on present standards it is our opinion that this lot has: /% r'AVOPI:.BLE �7 QUESTIONABLE /7 NOT SUITED Soil for septic tank and drainfield installat%n. Remarks: 0 t/ Ade. n,, llJ/%�K� /��,�rnsl.�'id�✓ _-?'� COr�.�' c-�" 7'.C�'9�`F� _?-y ��ifTi�v� S• fi,�j-, C- f Y.(Tlr�►r� _ Xd- pL T is is not a permit to ins a a septic T-anx. San r an s' a Date Posted Grid 21/—? At i @ J A P P L I C A T I O N F O R For Offe Use Only: Case No. J' Z2 Zoning — A U S E P E R M I T T O P A R K A M 0 B I L E H 0 M E QUEEW AND RENEWAL) (Following information is to be typed or printed) 1. Name of Applicant: / 41(Must be owner & occupant of the Mobile ome hone 2. Address of Applicant Tele p iny�7 ill 3. Mailing address where mobile home will be located *Magisterial District 11<--�- Tax Map No. Subd. Name Lot or Parcel_ 5 Blk. Sec. A map of this property must be attached to this application. This map must be to scale. 4. Name of owner of property on which mobile home will be parked _ 1 jV- . V v_T%Ilmll 3a c If the applic t is not the wn r of the property in estionso explain.) �i - 5. I mobile home a -n ill rem@unoccupied, explain00-1 _ a U 01 6. Time requested for mobile home to remain at site (use permit granted for a maximum of two years only.) of wa months yeait 7. 1.1 m Size and type of mobile home to be parked on the above noted i property. Make�ModelkfU #kVordjr32W_Width _A Lengthd S No. of Bedrooms A No. of Bathrooms Source of water supply Method of sewage dispo Information obtainable from the office of the County Assessor. (Room 213) 9. Information, addresses, and signatures of all property owners,occupants who are adjacent to the parcel on which the mobile home be located must be provided in the spaces below. We, the undersigned owners and occupants of the adjacent property to the property on which a mobile home is proposed to be located, hereby certify that we do or do not object to the granting of a Use Permit to park a mobile home on the propert-�7 described in this petition. Information available from the office of the County Assessor (Room 213). Name (print) F 'end �t 1 S Owner (") Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. ;'� - /� (�� Block No. Lot or Parcel No. Address: /e a 4 Check One Only I do object I do not oblect Signature: Name (print) Owner ('') Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. ,� - / D (a� Block No. Lot or Parcel No. Address: J e cz cZ� Check One Only I do object Signature: I do not object ( k1---) Name (print) 7"��., Se Owner (`� ) Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. - -/ D (�a�Block No. Lor or Parcel No. Address: Gni J \ C -a I do object Signature. Check One Only I do not object Additional spaces on back of page. (2) Name (print.) �d %/he -S of t Owner ( Occupant ( ) Tax Map No.^ g,9-/6 Block No. Lot or Parcel No. Address: Check One Only I do object I do not object r I Signature: Name (print) )h e �" Owner ( Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. Block No. Lot or Parcel No.,,/ Address: Check One Only I do object Signature: I do not object Name (print) AC ec; 1)04)) a -in r I'/ ,, Owner Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. Block No. Lot or Parcel No. _ Address: )A-36 !CP Ura) e 4C% `1 Check One Only I do object Signature: I� r Name (print) I do not object Owner ( ) Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. Block No. Lot or Parcel No. Address: I do object Signature: Check One Only (3) I do not object 10. THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE SUM OF FORTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($45.00) TO BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION TO ASSIST IN DEFRAYING THE COST OF PROCESSING THE SAME. A) Check or money order must be made payable to: Treasurer, County of Chesterfield B) Application fee ($45.00) is not refundable. 11. The Chesterfield County Health Department must make an inspection of the proposed or existing mobile home location site (both new & renewal). It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the Health Department and make an appointment for this inspection (telephone - 748-1398). The inspection form must be attached to this application. 12. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING UNLESS OR UNTIL: All questions have been answered i8') Location map or plat is attached Health Department inspection form attached p P Application is signed and notarized. THE APPLICANT AND/OR HIS AGENT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE BOARD HEARING. I/We hereby certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any exhibits transmitted herewith are true. �. Imo_, i Subscribed and sworn to before me this_Lday oft�__' 197.3 . My Commission expiresr,do (Notary Public) (Page 4) P 0' • \ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT _A CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA Request for Lot Evaluation For: Applicant JeoL, ,�v6 STOK,C c , `/� Address ,r6' , -- Phone �3i._ B'9 i 7 C,2 / -sem' F ':f .!u/�. Owner Address Phone Exact Location Of Premises ,,6� �,%l cl'5.t,V C O.&A 7— S URTV3-sion Ttpplicant Desires to have a lot opinion that is subject to re- evaluation prior to issuance of Building Permit. /7 Is applying for Building Permit # ? Type of Construction / Dwellin ik"�� g / Other /7 House plan not final ff Auto. Washer /_7Garbage Disposal 47 Public water L7 Ind. well Actual or potential bedroom�Estimated water consumptiont�ogpd. Soil Study: Sa�.n S✓ L �.4N Loi„ 7za yy'' i.v ,p,�.y,� �� r•�c Recommendations: Based on present standards it is our opinion that this lot has: IZI FAVORABLE L% QUESTIONABLE /% NOT SUITED Soil for septic tank and drainfield installation. Remarks,. -C.r PSC. 7-" c e�' �¢ .� a s�,✓�e m ie This s not a permit _to �insra La septic tan . an i. an - - Date - Posted Grid 9: -t o MEMORANDUM 9 June 11, 1973 TO: Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors FROM: Stanley R. Balderson, Jr., Chief Planner SUBJECT: Planning Commission Recommendations on Zoning Ordinance Amendments; (1) Individual Mobile Home Permits within Industrial Districts; (2) Common areas and ownership of property in the Townhouse (R-7) zone as relating to the State Horizontal Property Act. On May 15, 1973 the County Planning Commission discussed the advisability of approving the aforementioned Zoning Ordinance Amendments. Specifically, the first amendment would allow mobile homes to be parked within an industrial zone subject to the obtaining of a mobile home permit from the Board of Supervisors. The Planning Commission recom- mended that individual cases be handed by the Board upon approval of a request to first rezone the subject property to the Residential (R-2) classification and then grant a mobile home permit on the subject parcel (both could be accomplished within the same application and hearing.) With regard to an amendment which would establish conformance of the County Townhouse for Sale (R-7) zoning classification and the State Horizontal Property Acts,the Commission unanimously recommend approval of the proposal as submitted. ,S i O -A J /7 JIM A n M ENGINEERING AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS .TUNE 11: 1973 I. Request of Southampton Acres Area concerning sewer service. II. Approval of water contracts: W73-37CD Physic Hill, Section "E" $ 10,949.70 W73 -34D Chippenham Square Apts. 142872.50 W73 -40D Pocoshock Townhouses, Phase II 5,335.00 W73-35CD-1 Stigall Drive 2,800.00 W73-35CD-2 Moravia Drive 840.00 III. Award of Projects W73-23CD, Lyndale, and W73 -24C, Galena Avenue, for installation of water lines to 3 M Construction Company, Incorporated in the amount of $31,132.60.. IV. Approval of sewer contracts: S73 -39D Pocoshock Townhouses, Phase II $ 15,255.00 S7 -41D Meadowdale, Section "H" 10,403.99 S73 -40D Courthouse Green, Section "B" 452102.90 S73 -38D The Meadows 953,041.00 S73 -4D Kingswood 48,547.00 V. Letter dated May 11, 1973 from SELCO requesting 60 -day extension of time on Project 6511-19 VI. Approval of Change Order No. 1 - Contract 7032-1 VII. Consideration of sewer extension to serve E1 Rancho Trailer Park. VIII. Review of alternate routes to pump the Swift Creek sewage to the Falling Creek system. IX. Review of request for sewer service to serve the Wil -Car property on Route 10. X. Review of request for sewer service to serve Castle Park Systems, in the Enon Lagoon. XI. Approval of Street Names XII. Miscellaneous ' eat rer company COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE P. O. BOX 6482 1804 DABNEY ROAD, RICHMOND. VIRGINIA 28230 TuLZPHo" 703/363-7994 C����o A. May 11, 1973 Mr. David H. Welchons Assistant County Enginee Chesterfield County t ;. Chester, Virginia 23832 7 7 Subject: Wil -Car Property, adjacent to Continental Can Tree Farm, Route 10, Chesterfield County, Virginia Dear Mr. Welchons: As per our phone conversation regarding subject property, we have a large national client who is interested in locating on the site, provided we can work out some sewage availability. On a number of occasions, Mr. Painter has advised me that if we would put up approximately One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00), he thought the County would provide the balance of the money necessary to make the sewage available in the area. My client would need the sixty-four (64) acres of the Wil -Car property plus sixteen (16) acres of the Brickhouse property making a total of eighty (80) acres. Based on the sewage charge of One Thousand, Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($1,250.00) this would provide One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00). We would advance the remaining Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) for additional tap on credits based on $1,250.00 an acre. As we discussed over the phone, the prospective client's sewage requirements would be Three Hundred Fifty (350) gallons per minute or a`total _of One Million, Eight Hundred Thousand (1,800,000) gallons a month. The B. 0. D requirements would be 15,800 pounds per month and suspended solids, 7,900 pounds per month._ The prospective company would be building a Five Hundred Thousand (500,000)f4foot building which.would provide a tax base approximating Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000.00). This should be an incentive for the County to provide sewage either. by Johnson's Creek or by pumping it back to U. S. Rt 1. We will provide you with the time r Mr. David H Welchons Page 2 May 11, 1973 requirement just as soon as this information is available. I wish you would indicate to me the earliest possible time we can provide sewage for the area. It is also nice to know that you are contem- plating providing a new One Million (1,000,000) gallon storage tank for the area. I wish you would provide me with a letter outlining your prospective plans because this would be most helpful toward getting this client to locate in this area. I might add that I discussed the conditions of this letter with Mr. Burnette yesterday afternoon, and he was very interested in our prospective client, and he assured me that the County would do everything possible to help locate them in this area. Very truly yours, R. o REP:j CC: Mr. James B. Gregory ep .f ;1 04#osS' P_rt'G..r• �'"t,�+"cs. '.�_1 �,�r�'..,�,t /f,►�i.o .,Lr,��+y -77 �ytrirldA d"iv ;, i ;. F a c r 4 : T APPLICATION FOR BINGO AND/OR RAFFLE PERMIT t . The undersigned applicant, pursuant to the provisions of e3`` .Section 18.1-316 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, hereby; petitions the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, for, 8' ° one-year permit to conduct Bingo games and/or raffles. 1. The applicant, in support of this petition, says that it d4 is a proper organization to conduct such Bingo games and/or raffles because (state here the kind of organization requesting,said'permit , oc_/r, � w ��U 2. An authenticated copy of a resolution of the Board of Directors or other governing body of said organization requesting said permit is attached hereto, together with supporting evidence that said organization is an organization permitted to conduct said r Bingo games and raffles '`under Section 18.�1�-316= of the. C '��;� n k of`Virginia, as amended, 3. The applicant further states that it has read=all of the76, conditions which will be a part of said permit and agrees to ccin►1 '. 4t /j x `' APPLICANT ( By r qM1 STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY of CHESTERFIELD, to-wit: 1p Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of<. Ply .eQission exp.res: dxx41Y a otary Public, � 3 f' k S � t t} A R", t( Tl p *u ( CHAPTER, 4 63 An Act to amend artd reenact §§ 18.1-816 and 15.1-340 of the Code of Vir- ginia relating to penalties for gccnibling ol� conducting a lottery; lot- teries prohibited; providing certain exceptions. [H 1249] Approved W,R 2 0 1973 Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia 1. That §§ 18.1-316 and 18.1-340 of the Code of Virginia be amencled and reenacted as follows: § 18.1-316. Gambling prohibited.—(a) Any person who shall bet, wager or play at any game for money or other thing of value shall be fined not exceeding one hundred dollars, or confined in jail not exceeding sixty days, or both. (b) This section shall not apply to any bingo game or raffle conducted in accordance with the provisions of § 18.1-840 (b). § 18.1-340. illanaging, etc., a lottery, etc., or buying, selling, etc., chances. ; (a) If any person: (1) Set up, promote or be concerned in managing or drawing a lottery or raffle for money or other thing of value, (2) Knowingly permit such lottery in any house under his control, (3) Knowingly permit money or other property to be raffled for in such house, or to be won ;therein, by throwing or using dice, or by any other game of -chance, (4) Knowingly permit the sale in such house of any chance or ticket in, or share of a ticket in, a lottery, or any writing, certificate, bill, token or other device purporting or intended to guarantee or assure to any person, or entitle him to a prize or share of, or interest in a prize to be drawn in a lottery, or, (5) For himself or another person buy, sell or transfer, or have in his possession for the purpose of sale or with intent to exclr^nge, negotiate or transfer, or aid in selling, exchanaing, negotiating or transferring, a chance or ticket in or share of a ticket in a lottery, or any such writing, certificate, bill, token or device, He shall be confined in jail not exceeding one year, and fined i:ot ex- ceeding five hundred dollars; provided that any person who shall violate any of the provisions of this section when such violation shall consist of the operation or conduct of a lottery commonly kno�-, n as the numbers game or the numbers racket shall be confined in the penitentiary not less than one year nor more than ten years and fined not less than five hundred dollars, or in the discretion of the jury or the court trying the case without a jury, he shall be confined in jail not less than six months nor more than twelve months and fined not more than five hundred dollars, either or both. (b) This section shall not apply to any Wv[;o r1arne or raffle co77ducted. solely Ini cony of the follov,,iriq: (1) A v07rcrzlary fir °, department, or rescr!e sc/tutd rchieh itas lreert recognized by an ordinance or resohitiorz of tltc Iroliticai subdivision tc•here the voluntary, fire department, or t-CsOve svad is located as bebip a. part of the safety Programa of stich political. siabdit•ision; (2) An organ-ization, ichiclt for )Pirpose of this section, shall be de- fined as any of the following ichich. operates without profit avid which lies been in existence contir?toa!slij for a period of two years irnnae�licr.tely prir�r to seeking a permit as hereinafter provided: (i) A corporation, twist, ch7t.rch, rrssocirrtzrn, cnirrn7vnfty chest, fio?d or follyidation organized and operated e: clrtsizelP for rc,liPtiotts, charitable, aY 1 2 Sr'[Prltlfrc, lrte),arJ, CoM-2nYiiit1 or edr{ , ,fir J catinnctl;nl.rpnses; �'' (ii) Posts r.j, associations of tear z-< <erans or arcs iliac f z�nits or sr socies of any sz.•ch posts or associations, if sacch. posts, associations, units 07 societies are organized in the United States ar rluy of its possessions; (iii) A fr(zte?rccl society, order or association operating under the lodge system; (iv) A corporation or association organized and operated exclusively for the restoration and maintenance of historic gardens and the general pro- notion of beautiful gardens• �t� Provided, howver, that RO part o the such activity inures directly or indirectly togthe sbe to ct�Eo clari� ed from shareholder, ntemb r, agent or employee o � f J private partme�tt, rest ad o� rganizatiod 11 11 11 , h volunteer fire de - "ad un ear re c n , rescue squad�iManization shall�notTIItent r into a contract with any person or fain, assocz�'tion, organization,Sl of enerslii to or corporation of any classification whatsoever, for the purpose of or7an- izing, managing Or condur, � duty of go games or raffles. Such volunteer fire departrrtertt, rescue squad ganization zrtay delegate the authority or oryayti.ing, managing or conducting bingo games or raffles only to cc natural �rerson or persons avJto aye bona fief members nff��such volunteer fire department, rescue squad o fes'nizatiort'o such volunteer fire depart ntent, rescue sgzucd or arganizahon shall cone act any bingo game or raffle without first havi)zg obtained an annual permit from th.e of tate political subdivision where, such volunteer fire dena9 department, reside s(iluad or business ofce of the -q a Cation is located nTo such volunteer fire departmEnt, rescue squad�1_91al ization slucll^�lace or lrerrnit to be Placed on the prerrrises, or zcithin one hundred yards of the premises,. where such b'rtgo gcc7rtP is to be conducted., ranysi�rt or signs eerlvertisiny stccla bingo fled , ua ly of all receipts and disbursements shall be kept and shall be filed annually with the Ca1r"'Issianer• of Accotcrits a division and such records shall be cc matter o f sac political sub- y body of such political sitbdivision)may revoh e 4 lsc recordf h�governing fire department re perr;tit ofCrar voluntee, ua or organization found to be not ir�o rzt ltc nee at%ith<lis su sec con ccnil ny per�o�i, shareholder', agent, merrtb o evzployee of�any stcc .volterzteer r + r tion vzolatbig this subsection shall be?�r uilty of rescue squad orj^ rr cnizrc- 4Lk cop S, r•onviction thereof shall be subject to a, J o.f cc Inisdeweano and upon dollars. fine not to exceed orte thousand Should any volunteer fire department,,rescue sgtcad or organi.�ation l;e found in violation of this szsbsectimt, then the Contrrtorirceccli`lt Attornen be such political subdivision may, is addition to, theof penalty, apply to an fore criminal y court of competent jurisdiction for rcri injunction, against such volunteer fire rdepartnaent, rescue sg,'tad or organization front continuing to run bingo games or•the date of.srafj�l years from es for a period not to exceed three ns .uch violation. E E { BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD 'COUNTY, VIRGINIA: SECTION 1. Pursuant to Chapter 5 of Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia 1950 (the same being the Public Finance Act), an election heretofore held in Chesterfield County (the "County") on May 1, 1973, on the question of contracting a debt and issuing bonds in the maximum amount of $183,000,000 and an Order of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield Coupty entered May 30, 1973, for the purpose of extending, improv= r ing/, enlarging and adding to the existing sewer system and sewage disposal plants of the County (said sewer system and sewage disposal plants being hereinafter referred to as the "Project"), there shall now s/be issued general obligation bonds of the County in an aggregate principal amount of eighteen million dollars ($18,000,000), which bonds shall be designated "General Obligation Sewer Bonds" of Chesterfield County, Virginia (the "Bonds"). The Bonds shall be of the denomination of $5,000 `each; shall be numbered from 1 consecutively upward in order of maturity; and shall bear interest at such rate or rates per annum as fixed by resolution of the Board at the time of sale thereof, provided that the rate or rates of interest borne by the Bonds shall not exceed the maximum rate permitted by law at the time of sale thereof. As shall be determined by the Executive Secretary prior to the sale of the Bonds: The Bonds shall be dated as of a date not later than December 313, 1973; shall mature in such amounts in such years as may be determined by the Executive Secretary, the first installment of principal to mature not later than six (6) years from the date of the Bonds and the last installment of principal to mature not later than twenty-five (25) years from the date of the Bonds; shall bear interest to be payable commencing not later than one year from the date of the Bonds and semi-annually each six months thereafter; shall be payable both as to principal and interest at a place or places within or without the Commonwealth of Virginia, or both; may be -issued with privilege of registration as to principal only; and may be subject to redemption prior to the stated maturities thereof at the option of the County at any time on and after ten (10) years from the date thereof at redemption premiums not exceeding four per cent (4%) of the principal amount redeemed, upon such notice of redemption as is provided in th form of the Bonds hereinafter set forth; provided that all such details shall be subject to ratification by the Board of Supervisors of Chester - filed County (the "Board") at the time of sale of the Bonds, and provided further, that the Board reserves the right to change prior to the sale of the Bonds any or all of the foregoing limitations on the details of the Bonds. Without further authorization by the Board the Bonds shall be offered for, sale by the Executive Secretary at public or private sale at such time as he may deem advisable, for not less than the par value thereof. In the event the Executive Secretary determines to offer the Bonds at public sale he is further authorized to prepare a notice of sale in such form as he deems appropriate and to publish such notice in a financial journal published in the City of New York, New York and in a newspaper of general circulation in the County. SECTION 2. The Bonds shall be executed with the facsimile signature of the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, and the manual signature of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, and a facsimile of the seal of Chesterfield County shall be imprinted on the Bonds, the coupons attached to the Bonds shall be authenticated with the facsimile signatures of said Chairman and Clerk, and the Bonds, the coupons to be attached thereto and the provisions for registration thereof, if any, shall be in substantially the following form, with the text which is in brackets to be inserted in the Bonds if applicable to the details of the Bonds as finally fixed. No. (Form of Coupon Bond) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF VIRGINIA CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GENERAL OBLIGATION SEWER BOND $5,000 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Chesterfield County, Virginia, hereby acknowledges itself indebted and for value received promises to pay to the bearer hereof, [or, of this bond, be registered, to the registered holder hereof] upon surrender of this bond, the sum of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) on the day of 19,, - 2 - together with interest thereon at the rate of per centum, per annum payable and semi-annually thereafter on and in each year, upon presentation and surrender of the respective coupons hereto attached as they severally become due. Both the principal of and the interest on this bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America at the principal office of in , or, at the option of the holder at the principal office of i [The bonds of the issue of bonds of which this bond is one maturing on and after , shall be subject to redemption at the option of Chesterfield County prior to their stated maturities on and after , in whole at any time, or in part from time to time on any interest payment date in the inverse order of their maturities, at the redemption price with respect to each bond, expressed as a percentage of the principal amount redeemed set forth below, together with the interest accrued thereon to the date fixed for ;redemption: ,Period During which Redeemed Redemption (both dates inclusive) Price If at any time less than all the bonds of the issue of bonds of which this bond is one of any given maturity are called for redemption, the particular bonds of such maturity to be redeemed shall be selected by lot. If this bond is redeemable and shall be called for redemption, notice of the redemption hereof, specifying the designation, date, number and maturity of this bond, the date fixed for its redemption and the redemption price payable upon such redemption, shall be given by publication of such notice once in a daily newspaper printed in the English language and customarily published on each business day and of general circulation in Chesterfield County, Virginia, and once in at least one daily newspaper or financial publication printed in the English language and customarily published on each business day in the City of New York, New York, the date of publication of such notice in any case 3 - to be at least thirty days prior to the date fixed for redemption[.][; a provided that if this bond at the time shall be registered as to principal only, in accordance with the provisions for such registration endorsed hereon, notice of the redemption hereof may be given by the mailing at least thirty days before the redemption date by registered or certified mail of a copy of such notice to the registered owner hereof at his address as it appears upon the books of registry or at such other address which he may have filed with the County Treasurer, or other legally designated Registrar, for such purpose, in which event notice of the redemption hereof need not be given by publication; and provided further, if notice of the redemption hereof shall be given by publication as aforsaid, then neither the failure to mail any -"notice nor any defect therein shall affect the validity of any proceeding for the redemption of this bond.] If this bond shall be called for redemption and notice of such redemption duly given as aforesaid, and if on or before the redemption date the payment of the redemption price shall have been duly made or provided for, then this bond shall become due and payable upon such redemption date and interest hereon shall cease from and after the date so specified for the redemption hereof. This bond is one of an issue of bonds issued for the purpose of improving, extending, enlarging and adding to the existing sewer system and sewage disposal plants of Chesterfield County (said sewer system and sewage disposal plants being hereinafter referred to as the "Project"), pursuant to.q:l&nd in full compliance with the Constitution and statutes of Virginia, including Chapt6r,5 of Title 15.1 of the -Code of Virginia 1950, as amended, an election duly held under said Chapter in said County on the first day of May, 1973, an order of the Circuit Court of the County entered on 3D , 1973, and resolutions and proceedings of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County duly had and adopted. The Board of Supervisors, on behalf of Chesterfield County, Virginia, hereby pledges the.net revenues of the Project for the payment of the principal of and the interest on this bond and the issue of bonds of which it is one, which revenues are and may be also pledged for the payment of the principal of and the interest on other bonds of the County issued for sewer purposes. The Board covenants with the holder of this - 4 - bond and the coupons appurtenant hereto that the Chesterfield County will at all times operate the Project in a proper sound and economical manner, and make such rates, rents, fees and other charges to insure that the revenue of the Project shall be sufficient to pay the costs of operation and maintenance of the Project and to pay said bonds and coupons and any other indebtedness, including interest thereon, incurred in the establish- ment acquisition, construction, improvement, extension, addition, operation and maintenance of the Project. It is hereby certified, recited and declared that all acts, con- ditions and things required to exist, happen and be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this bond have existed, happened and been performed in due time, form and manner as required by law, and that the amount of this bond, together with all other indebtedness of Chesterfield County, does not exceed any limit prescribed by the Constitution and statutes of Virginia, and that provision has been made for raising annually by taxes on all the taxable property in said County, a sum sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on this bond as the same respectively become due and payable. The full faith and credit of Chesterfield County are hereby irrevocably pledged to the punctual payment of the principal of and interest on this bond, according to its terms. -- [This Bond is registrable as to principal only in accordance with the provisions endorsed on the back hereof.] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Chesterfield County, Virginia, has caused this bond to be signed by the facsimile signature of the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of said County and countersigned by the manual signature of the Clerk of said Board and a facsimile of the seal of said Board to be imprinted hereon and the coupons hereto attached to be signed with the facsimile signatures of said officers, and this bond to be dated as of the day of COUNTERSIGNED: Clerk, Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County, Virginia 1973. 5 - Chairman, Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County, Virginia No. %W v10 (FORM OF COUPON) On the day of , 19� [unless the bond hereinafter mentioned shall be subject to prior redemption and shall have heretofore been called for previous redemption and payment of the redemption price duly made or provided for] Chesterfired County, Virginia, will pay to bearer in lawful money of the United States of America principal office of Dollars ($ ), at the , being the interest then due on its General Obligation Sewer Bond, dated 1973, numbered Chairman, oar of Sup6rvio6ks Clerk, Boar of Supervisors [PROVISIONS FOR REGISTRATION This bond may be registered as to principal only in the name of the holder on books to be kept by the County Treasurer of Chesterfield County, or other legally designated Registrar, such registration being noted hereon by the Registrar, in the registration blank below after which no transfer hereof shall be valid unless made on said books by the registered holder or attorney duly authorized and similarly noted by the Registrar in said registration blank below, but it may be dis- charged from registration by being registered to bearer after which it shall be transferred by delivery, but it may be again registered as before. The registration of this bond shall not impair the negotiability of the coupons by delivery merely. (No writing in the spaces below except by the County Treasurer of Chesterfield County, or other legally designated Registrar.) DATE OF REGISTRATION IN WHOSE NAME REGISTERED REGISTRAR SECTION 3. There shall be levied annually at the same time and in the same manner as other taxes are assessed, levied and col- lected ad valorem taxes upon all the taxable property in Chesterfield County, Virginia, without limitation as to rate or amount, sufficient to provide for the paymeant of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as the same respectively become due and payable, in the event the net revenues of the Project are insufficient therefor. There is hereby exclusively pledged on�behalf of the Chesterfield County the net revenues of the Project for the payment of the principal of and. interest on the Bonds, for the payment of the principal of and interest on the bondsof the County heretofore issued, the payment of which is secured by a pledge of said net revenues, and, if hereafter so provided by this Board for the payment of the principal of and interest on bonds of the County hereafter issued for sewer purposes, the payment of which is hereafter lawfully secured by a pledge of said net revenues, ah&At is hereby covenanted with the holders of said bonds and the coupons appurtenant thereto that Chesterfield County will at all times operate the Project in a proper, sound and economical manner and make such rates, rents, fees and other charges to insure that the revenues of the _Project shall be sufficient to pay the costs of operation and - maintenance of the Project and to pay the Bonds and the coupons appurtenant thereto and any other indebtedness, including interest thereon, incurred in the establishment, acquisition, construction, improvement, enlargement, operation and maintenance of the Project. SECTION 4. The County hereby covenants with the holders from time to time of the Bonds as hereinafter set forth in this section. No use of the proceeds of the Bonds shall be made which, if such use had been reasonably expected on the date of issue of the Bonds, would have caused the Bonds to be "arbitrage bonds", within the meaning of Section 103(d)(2) of the U S. Internal Revenue Code of 1954. The County shall comply with the requirements of said section of said Internal Revenue Code and the applicable regulations of the Internal Revenue Service adopted thereunder so long as any Bond is outstanding. SECTION 5. This'resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. - 7 - .-,vwF,ALT 1+ Go] DAVID B. AYRES, JR. CHAIRMAN JOHN M. RASNICK, JR. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY OF Vmf,-, N C. 3. Form 41 JOSEPH S. JAMES STUART W. CONNOCK EX -OFFICIO MEMBERS COMPENSATION BOARD P. O. BOX 1177 Whenever an employee's position becomes vacant, and it is RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23209 necessary to fill it, the policy is to fix the sa'ary of the new June 1, 1973 incumbent at a figure suhstantially lower U.an that received by the old employee after years of experience in the particular TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD Position' You are hereby notified that the Compensation Board has tentatively fixed the salaries and expenses of office of the Attorney for the Commonwealth for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1974, as set out below. Copy to: Mr. Oliver D. Rudy Attorney for the Commonwealth SALARIES: Attorney for the Commonwealth EMPLOYEES: Morris E. Mason, Assistant Herbert C. Gill, Jr., Assistant Philip V. Daffron, Assistant Brenda H. Garnett, Secretary Linda K. Brugnoli, Secretary Temporary Employees - Extra Help OFFICE EXPENSES: Office Supplies, Stationery, Printing Postage and P. 0. Box Rent Repairs Telephone Subscription to Criminal Law Reporter Very truly yours, Chairman Total for all purposes $17,000.00 15,360.00 11,220.00 10,992.00 7,586.00 4,992.00 $ 67,150.00 375.00 $ 500.00 100.00 100.00 515.00 140.00 1,355.00 $ 68,880.00 M DAVID B. AYRES, JR. CHAIRMAN JOHN M. RASNICK, JR. °M►eg EXECUTIVE SECRETARY COMPENSATION BOARD RG IN I4�_ C. B. Form 42 JOSEPH S. JAMES STUART W. CONNOCK EX -OFFICIO MEMBERS P. O. BOX 1177, !1Rlhenewer-en rmph)yee s position becomes vacant, and it is RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23209 necessary to fill it, the policy is to fix the salary of the new June 1, 1973 incumbent at a figure substantially lower than t' -at r-ccved by the old employee after years of experience in the par.ica:ar position. TO TELE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD: You are hereby notified that the Compensation Board has tentatively fixed the salaries and expenses of office of the Treasurer for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1974, as set out below. Copy to: Mr. George W. Moore, Jr. Treasurer Chesterfield County Very truly yours, Chairman OFFICE EXPENSES: Premium on Official Bonds, Burglary and other Insurance ........ $ Tax Tickets for State and Local Taxes .......................... Stationery, Office Supplies, Printing (Forms and Letters) and Binding ................................................. 2,500.00 Advertising - Newspaper, Hand Bills (Does not include cost of advertising any list of any delinquent taxes of any kind)... 700.00 Postage and P. 0. Box Rent ..................................... 8,500.00 Telephone and Telegraph (Tax Excluded) ......................... 3,800.00 Repairs to Office Furniture and Equipment (Including Service Contracts) .................................. 2,500.00 $ 18,000.00 Mileage for use of Treasurer on official business (10q, per mile) OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT AND RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT: Data Processing Service - Rental equipment Rental of sorter Rental of postage meter Electrostatic copier Electric typewriter Binders SALARIES: Treasurer EMPLOYEES: Blunt, Marian T., Clerk Clements, Violet L., Clerk Eyler, Rosemary F., Clerk Kidd, Grace T., Clerk $ 14,400.00 700.00 200.00 1,000.00 525.00 150.00 $ 13,629.00 4,827.00 6,666.00 5,571.00 5,862.00 720.00 16,975.00 0. M Chesterfield County Treasurer Page 2 June 1, 1973 Leonard, Helen K., Clerk Mann, Edna K., Clerk McGuire, Mary W., Deputy Pamplin, Sarah P., Clerk Price, Evelyn T., Clerk Reams, Frances C., Clerk Rieves, Margaret C., Clerk Spivey, Janet A., Clerk Swinson, Beverly A., Clerk *Vacancy Temporary Employees - Extra Help Data Processing Salaries Total for all purposes In *Name to be furnished Compensation Board - use C.B. Form 10 6,249.00 6,762.00 8,808.00 4,932.00 5,037.00 4,698.00 5,166.00 6,150.00 4,263.00 4,059.00 $ 922679.00 $ 10,000.00 203680.00 30,680.00 $159,054.00 DAVID B. AYRES, JR. CHAIRMAN JOHN M. RASNICK, JR. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY n nR. � 1. r ♦ � � a 1. ., M C. B. Form 43 JOSEPH S. JAMES STUART W. CONNOCK EX -OFFICIO MEMBERS COMPENSATION BOARD is P. O. BOX 1177 Whenever an employee's position becomes vacant, and it RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23209 necessary to fill it, the policy is to fix the salary of the new June 1, 1973 incumbent at a figure substantially lower than that received by the old employee after years of experience in the particular position. TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 01' THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD: You are hereby notified that the Compensation Board has tentatively fixed the salaries and expenses of office of the Commissioner of the Revenue for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1974, as set out below. Copy to: Very truly yours, Mr. H. B. Walker Commissioner of the Revenue "4.1./ Chairman OFFICE EXPENSES: Premium on Official Bonds, Burglary and other Insurance....... $ 10.00 Tax Tickets for State and Local Taxes ........................... 60000.00 Stationery, Office Supplies, Printing (Forms and Letters) 2,500.00 and Binding ........................................ ........ Advertising - Newspaper, Hand Bills ............................ -0- Postage and P. 0. Box Rent ..................................... 5,000.00 Telephone and Telegraph (Tax Excluded) ......................... 1,400.00 Repairs to Office Furniture and Equipment (Including Service Contracts) .............................. 1.300.00 $ 16,210.00 Mileage for use of Commissioner of the Revenue on official business 500.00 (10(,% per mile) OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT AND RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT: 15,600.00 Data Processing Rental SALARIES: $13,620.00 Commissioner of the Revenue EMPLOYEES: 9,432.00 Wingfield, W. H. 7,752.00 Johnson, F. G. 6,228.00 Schools, E. C. 6,228.00 Conner, R. E. 6,096.00 Spake, L. V. 5,256.00 Worley, R. I. Chesterfield County Commissioner of the Revenue Page 2 June 1, 1973 Carpenter, L. B. Wooldridge, N. J. Adams, J. S. Perry, C. C. Sykes, A. T. Clark, B. V. Jennings, I. J. Data Processing Salaries Temporary Employees - Extra Help Total for all purposes 4,920.00 5,256.00 4,536.00 4,920.00 4,920.00 5,028.00 3,965.00 14,400.00 102,557.00 4,000.00 $138,867.00 I DAVID B. AYRES, JR. CHAIRMAN JOHN M. RASNICK, JR. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY M RM TT n`l A 0777 . 0�0" C. B. Form 44 JOSEPH S. JAMES STUART W. CONNOCK EX -OFFICIO MEMBERS June °' 3 T9 13 Whenever an employee's position becomes vacant, and it is COMPENSATION BOARD necessary to fill it, the policy is to fix the salary of the new P. O. BOX 1177 incumbent at a figure su`;slan.ially lower than that received RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23209 by the old employee after years of experience in the particular position. TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD: You are hereby notified that the Compensation Board has tentatively fixed the salaries and expenses of office of the Sheriff for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1974, as set out below. Copy to: 1 s Mr. E. L. Wingo Sheriff Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia Very tru yyyyour , P,4, �-63. � /. Chairman OFFICE EXPENSES: .$ 460.00 Premium on Official Bonds. . • •••••• .. ..... Stationery, Office SuppliesandPrinting............. 450.00 *Radio Maintenance (Including Service Contracts) or 650.00 Repair Costs.. .............................. Postage and Post Office Box Rent ..................... 800.00 Telephone and Telegraph (Tax Excluded) ..............• 2,000.00 Repairs to Office Furniture and Equipment 300.00 (Including Service Contracts) .............. County owned automobiles SALARIES: $13,920.00 Sheriff FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES: 7,776.00 Bell, J. C., Jailor Bray, F. H., Court Bailiff 7/1/73 - 12/31/73 @ 7392. 1/1/74 - 6/30/74 @ 7760. 7,576.00 Carroll, J, R., Jailor 6,432.00 6,432.00 Dowdy, S. R., Jailor 7,776.00 Furman, T. 0., Jailor 5,880.00 Gentry, G. P., Matron 5,880.00 Gibson, M. L., Matron 6,432.00 Goode, T., Secretary 6,432.00 Gray, William - Jailor Johnson, J. C., Sergeant jailor 7,392.00 Mooney, T. L., Cook 4,992.00 6,384.00 Nunnally, G. E., Jailor 6,144.00 Ferguson, R. J., Jailor Dickerson, H. H., Jailor 61144.00 Patrick, T. A., Jailor 6,432.00 Phillips, R. E., Lieutenant deputy 7/1/73 - 12/31/73 @ 7760. 1/1/74 - 6/30/74 @ 8160. 7,960.00 $ 4,660.00 I 0 05 Page 2, Chesterfield Sheriff (con't) SALARIES: Rieves, F. H., Court Bailiff Robbins, H. E., Jailor Stosch, J. A., Sergeant jailor Taylor, 0. L., Jail Administrator -Sergeant *** Matron Washington, L. S., Matron Williams, C. G., Deputy Captain Wilmoth, D. C., Bookkeeper & deputy 7/1/73 - 12/31/73 @ 5880. 1/1/74 - 6/30/74 @ 6144. Wilson, 0. N., Sergeant Jailor *** Court deputy *** Jailor * Jailor Moran, S. K., Jailor *** Jailor Temporary Employees - Substitute for vacation and sick leave Total for all purposes Number of part-time deputies authorized - None In $7,392.00 6,432.00 7,032.00 7,776.00 5,880.00 5,880.00 9,408.00 6,012.00 7,392.00 6,432.00 6,096.00 6,096.00 6,096.00 6,096.00 * Maintenance and repair cost of automobile police radio equipment including radio transmitter system and all accessories thereto. *** Name to be furnished Compensation Board (Use C. B. Form 10) $214,004.00 2,400.00 $221,064.00 Form 24 SERV_CE AGRES40T 111 \1 County of ��<ESi/L%—/�✓% ^ MEMORA:;DL�(w 4 CF AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 4 day of --C( ►�� , 19 -, by and between Q-1i��%i of �'}(� `T�•� r t 2")CIA/ LZ , hereinafter called the Landowner and the Virginia Divisicn of Forestry, a Division of the Department of Conservation and Economic Development, by and through its agent, hereinafter called the Division of Forestry. WITNESSETH, THAT For and in consideration of the agreement of the Landowner to pay to the Division of Forestry char;es as herein agreed upon for those forestry ,seervices rendered on a certain tract of land of the Landowner, known as �L >F/✓ T 1C%CWfa 7�A��rlocated near / V 'S Po ti n on or near Highway No. 3 (yy in the County of Ce,,<E57: Virginia. vision of Forestry will provide one or more of the following services: Timber Marking: (a) Select and mark trees which should be (cut- under accepted forestry principles; or designate areas to be (harvested left) (b) Select and mark sawtimber trees which should be cut under accepted forestry principles and f-zrnish the Landowner a report showing the volume of timber by tree scale and species which has been marked for cutting. (2) Seed Tree Marking: That t -.e designated seed trees will be thrifty, possess a good crown, capable of bearing seed, an!, where possible, at least eight (8) seed trees shall be pine and/or two seed trees shall be yellow poplar, fourteen (14) inches in diameter or larger at a point ten (10) inches above ground level, or if trees of that diameter cannot be found, two (2) smaller trees shall be designated for each larger tree not found. (3) Other Tirrber services: The Landowner agrees to pay the Division of Forestry within thirty (30) days of receipt of a statement for services rendered at the rate of $ Z.L per It is specifically agreed by and between the parties hereto: (1) That the Landowner or his agent will locate, designate, and assume responsibility for boundaries c` the tract to be marked or on which specific forestry practices will be instituted and technical assistance provided. (2) That the report of volume of timber marked for harvesting shall be a part of the public record, a.d may be shown upon bona fide request to prospective purchasers or other interested parties. (3) That the Landowner, in further consideration of the service rendered by the Division of Forestry, will abide by the marking in the sale of the timber; and, further, declares it to be his intent to so manage his woodland as to insure continuing crops. (4) That the probable life of the paint used in marking being not more than twenty- four (24) months, any remarking of any timber which may be required shall be the responsi- bility of the Lwidowner. (5) That the Landowner assumes responsibility for any employee or person employed by him to assist in the conduct of a stated forestry project. WITNESS the following signatures: VIRGINIA DIVISICti OF FORESTRY LANDOWNER OR AGENT CHESTERFIELD C(�s.1�'J"f�'f B iL Title: Form 24 SERVICE AGRNWNT County of /=`l" �e✓C/ I MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 1� day of LA , 19 _, by and between ��� % y2�i�C✓� LD . of L t-� i 76= ✓LE=1 c U e0 U N hereinafter called the Landowner and the Virginia Division of Forestry, a Division of the Department of Conservation and Economic Development, by and through its agent, hereinafter called the Division of Forestry. WITNESSETH, THAT For and in consideration of the agreement of the Landowner to pay to the Division of Forestry charges as herein agreed upon for those forestry ,seervices rendered on a certain tract of land of the Landowner, known as iQ L DE��/ T /lE/� T�C�Tlocated near ��: {� E /Z �/ �S Pp �✓ n , on or near Highway No. v , in the County of 72 /9EZI!!` C-© Virginia. Division of Forestry will ro�vide one or more of the following services: Timber Marking: (a) Select and mark trees which should be (cut -left) under accepted forestry principles; or designate areas to be (harvested' f) (b) Select and mark sawtimber trees which should be cut under accepted forestry principles and furnish the Landowner a report showing the volume of timber by tree scale and species which has been marked for cutting. (2) Seed Tree Marking: That the designated seed trees will be thrifty, possess a good crown, capable of bearing seed, and, where possible, at least eight (S) seed trees shall be pine and/or two seed trees shall be yellow poplar, fourteen (14) inches in diameter or larger at a point ten (10) inches above ground level, or if trees of that diameter cannot be found, two (2) smaller trees shall be designated for each larger tree not found. (3) Other Timber Services: The Landowner agrees to pay the Division of Forestry within thirty (30) days of receipt of a statement for services rendered at the rate of $ 7S perG�L/ /Z - It is specifically agreed by and between the parties hereto: (1) That the Landowner or his agent will locate, designate, and assume responsibility for boundaries of the tract to be marked or on which specific forestry practices will be instituted and technical assistance provided. (2) That the report of volume of timber marked for harvesting shall be a part of the public record, and may be shown upon bona fide request to prospective purchasers or other interested parties. (3) That the Landowner, in further consideration of the service rendered by the Division of Forestry, will abide by the marking in the sale of the timber; and, further, n declares it to be his intent to so manage his woodland as to insure continuing crops. (4) That the probable life of the paint used in marking being not more than twenty- four (24) months, any remarking of any timber which may be required shall be the responsi- bility of the Landowner. (5) That the Landowner assumes responsibility for any employee or person employed by him to assist in the conduct of a stated forestry project. WITNESS the following signatures: VIRGINIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY c B Title: LANDOWNER OR AGENT crGa-c CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, d -NY Inc. (Q, 1.. �[dffLLTL�MPJL Cn� 5010 WALLER ROAD - P. O. BOX 6915 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23230 PHONE 353-3926 - 355-5680 June 5, 1973 Chesterfield County Airport Chesterfield, Virginia Attention: Mr. Tom Page Re: Airport Job Gentlemen: Per your request, I am listing below the cost incorporated in our original bid for the mechanical and electrical. Mechanical $24,330.00 Electrical 13,755.00 Very truly yours, HENDRI STRUCTION COMPANY 'S. F. Nelms SFN:etw Explanation of additional charges for mechanical and electrical services for the Maintenance hangars� at Chesterfield County Airport. syt&y ;/ ': �I /rVVW 1. The original plan for heatingand air conditioning was totally inadequate in the,Lean-to portion of the building. The only heat provided was through ��---- two wall heater units. Through the services of James Thompson who was called on for an air conditioning load and heat loss study, it was determined that the air conditioning provision was only a fourth as much as it should have been. Mr. Thompson then reconstructed the mechanical portion of the building and provided for heating and air conditioning for the building that would he adequate for the present and for the future with the increased size in the mechanical service, additional electrical service must also be planned for. �i 2. The original plan did not include 115 volt outlets in the hangar area. Three outlets for wall were added. 3. An air compressor was added to the original plan to be used in conjunction with the air powered tools and equipment. A three phase electrical outlet had to be added to supply electricity to it. 4. To facilitate the use of an electric welder in the hangar area, three, three phase outlets were added. 5. The overall electrical services to the building was increased from 400 amps to 800 amps. ofi e.otCU4le--C-4 COMPANY, Inc. 5010 WALLER ROAD - P. O. BOX 6915 PHONE 353-3926 - 355-5680 (;01.(11 t1' Aivpovt 'rom kY+!,n': Lciz)o vt: RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23230 Alay 21, 197 'I�r m 1:?f:':f., .y S,1'.)73, „ALI! r'c;f'erenc-c: to additional. cor "o,r ��c�e;_ar.it:;xl�nc1 crle;t'i a ioa1, I ant li. tin,; i,leloc� a breakdown of ik.�r:<ls i�1c'1u ied. 1. :c�ciaaIli. c<7l. - Per '%Jl.livms T,l(nlp:�oi ;n ;inerr. 3. ili'leccric• tl - 'ro It-wlu:ie-: A. Increase elect ictel service From 400 to 800 AWS. L. ;ire iicnf in-,, ve�,.11<<.i �1ir conditioning in ac;cor-ianc,:e plans :)y '1me_, .'w. , G,:rl"iiv? e1'. k70 '11' we L_'Ij.11 ; r•:°c;� t�taclt;s. i � , i'c�r i l.) 1W ai° cor;;garessor ^tiU (1) sF:l.c.l (`') ztapo711rovf f' i .cl:urcrys . T:+i_ s was for— a to Lal of -------------------- _l1 , =ti3h,,15. V,'ry truly youl's, ;i ",\'i- iICY C.'QNsT}.UCT101i ;;�aun V. Nelms it b"Oby served that SoMrsen Cavmty, Virginia, a political subdivisions 000111 Chapter 100Acts of Virginia 19801, acting by and through the 0oard of 4000 bbrsby select b have sash of the employees and officers of the 4~71 wbo are regniarly employed full time on a salary basis and whose tenure is `a 00tricted as to Umper*ry or previsional appgintments to become eligible to 040" under the dtp Lire ltsarsnce program effective r moods •et forth in Section 51-111.67t1 through Section. 1. ti , of Me GO& a►f Virginia, as sech Code has. Mega or may be amended from time to time and "W` 0.0*r4 *gas** to deduaet from said employees wages and pay over in the manner pr r#bed, the respa4tive amounts required by law, and, further to pay the required omployor cost. IOPW# tboroUre, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors oi- Jefforssn Cis Clark of the Board, are hereby enthorlmed and Oroeted in the see of said County, to etpecwte any;a required a#a*Mct in order that employees of Jefferson County may become eligible to participate 14 the Group Life htsuranee program as provided in the aft+romestiwwd sections of the COAP of Virginia. U execution of arty contract which may be required, the seal of Yelterton County shall be affixed and attested by the Clerk and said officers of Jefferson Co" are dead directed- to-pay_from time to time -such -sums "-are due to be palmder saiontract by " Jefferson County and its employees. . CERTIFICATE 10 , Clerk, of the Board of Supervisors of To erson County, cortily that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of resolution passed at a lawfully organised meeting of the Board of Supervisors, Jefferson County, held at , Virginia, 8:00 o'clock P. M. 196-. a Given under my Dand and seal of Jefferson County, , Virginia this day of .196—. Clerk, Board of Supervisors My commission expires, n VIRGINIA: At a, regular meeting of the Chesterfield County School Board held Wednesday evening, April 25, 1973, at 8 o'clock, in the board roam of the School Administration Building PRESENT: lith. C. E. Curtis, Xr., Chairman IUlr. T. W. -Russell, Vice-chairman Mr. F. A. Uoseley, Xr. Dr. G. R. Partin ABSENT: Mr. P. T. Holmes On motion of Jnr. Mussell, + onded by Dr. Partin, the school board respectfully requests the board of supervisors to forward a resolution to the Virginia Supplemental Retirement System asking that the nonprofessional employees of the school board who are under the retirement system be allowed to participate in the state life insurance program. Robert A. Lux, Clerk A copy: teste- VIRGINIM At a re,ular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of, Chesterfield hold at the %.burthause on EaY 9t 1973 at 900 AoM* Cin motion of Mro O'Neill # seconded by Mromyersq it is resolved that thft 1,chool request for asci:-itance in asking the Virginia Supplemental ketirement to include the non—professional employees of the school Board under the Retirement System - be, and it hereby is approved* Ayes: Air. liornerl MIT, kiyerst Mire Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. A Copys Teste BOYD F. COLLIER DIRECTOR JOHN R. STREET ASSISTANT DIRECTOR G )MMo [,?G'NIA- VIRGINIA SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM FINANCE BUILDING POST OFFICE BOX S -X RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23207t November 14, 1972 Dr. R. F. Kelly Superintendent Chesterfield County Schools Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Dr. Kelly: ti v BOARD OF TRUSTEES ERWIN H. WILL, JR.. CHAIRMAN DAVID B. AYRES. JR. WALTER W. CRAIGIE, JR. FREORIC R. EICHELMAN WILLIAM H. FORST JAMES E. GALLEMER JOSEPH S. JAMES BRUCE R. KING. JR. CHARLES NELSON We have been requested by Mr. John Kopto of your Division of Buildings and Grounds to forward information regarding coverage for your non-professional employees under the group life insurance program which is administered by this agency. We are pleased to enclose a guide resolution, which should be adapted to suit the particular needs of your school board and adopted by the governing body should your board wish to provide coverage under the program. It would be necessary that the school board certify to this office that as of the effective date of coverage under our program, there is no other group life insurance program in existance for full time salaried non-professional employees. Should coverage . be provided, 75 per cent of eligible employees must elect to participate in the program by the effective date. Eligible employees are those who are full time salaried employees, Any employee who has attained age 60 by the effective date is not eligible for coverage. After the effective date of coverage, all new employees, otherwise eligible, are automatically covered under the program. The initial employer contribution rate for the plan is 40 per cent of total employee premiums collected. The percentage is subject to possible adjust- ment and, in future years, the rate will be based on the experience of the plan. Employees contribute 60 cents per month per thousand of salary, rounded to the next highest thousand. You will be billed on a quarterly basis for the share of employer costs. Administering Retirement, Group Life Insurance, and Social Security Coverage for Public Employees in Virginia Dr. R. F. Kelly November 14, 1972 Page 2 The effective date of coverage may not be earlier than the first of the month following the approval of the resolution by our Board of Trustees. The Board meets on the second Monday of each month. We shall be pleased to hear from you should you have any questions regarding the program. Very truly yours, Boyd F. Collier Director dt Enclosure cc: Mr. John Kopto baa •00 5u t%7o Z£Z uTUI�JTA 'ruowgoTu i 5b6£ x0g •0 •d r B ul °saoingTaisTq XITTTIfI £Z£Z uTUTtaTA `pUOU140Tu 8£O£ X0g '0 .d A axTduanj uuT44OTpTh OOV6 �' E •dao0 4uawd-Enbg xonay OLT 'ud `aTTTnu4aquZTT3 0 J 0 9-14S TTTuMOTUD 1[4noS TZ �, • ouI `j(uudwo0 uoliuM quMS 9Z£Z utUTtaTA 'puowuoT'd L8ZLZ Xog '0 'd �uI ` - oD Apog aaooW-igjTwS V �£Z£Z ETUT a!APUOwi{ -d y L699 x0g '0 'd ;aaa4S TTugsauW 'M OTU j jnuganad •nT6 jnuuanad y PZZ£Z uiuzbatn `puowl{oT'd LTZV Xog '0 .d j puou aoaawwo0 OOLT Fudwoa luawdinbg Mugsuaa0 s utuTaaTA `puowuoT'd Q TuUTwagL as-4uMdaaQ ZOLZ ao0 4uawdTnba xaui0-uMoag. )9Z£Z uTUTtaTA `puowuaTu «S 4TOJaON t • and jTwuinS caaauTtug 4uawdTnbg aaxug 1. M M O cd +► O --1 r-1 .tj 4J U Q w F.I 3 w u 3 N r., Cd } .r, V Cd .,� Cd a o 1p , a z ami z � as w ►'S A +j 4-+ d 0 C 4 00 •,01 3 .d z � ^d N O � O A W W H .O r1 U O 4-) O OA � O H W F -1 H C7 O z is z w F+Cd O r--1 u �-+ E¢, H C4 1 H z Q �4 N V E •� D41 N W O O O H z w w fo' w ¢ .-, r-4 a i � RESCUE 35 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN CONSTRUCTING ANIMAL RES'CU'E UNITS ■ �-& SWAB Est. ARF -12 Animal Rescue t I' ..: * 100% Fibreglas-reinforced Plastic — One -Piece Construction. ; Extra Strong — Light Weight Clean — Acid Resistant Fresh -Air Blower Molded by the unique McClarin Process for Longer Life & Service = Revolving Lights * 12 Compartments — 3 Sizes — Plus Ladder & Net Compartment , Deck Light * Stainless Steel Hinges and Locks = Ladders * Removeable Louvred Panels and Screens on Doors = Lettering & Decorations 1 * Mounts Onto Any Make Chassis — ; "Ortho -Pup" Animal Easily Transferable To New Chassis Scoop Stretcher * Insulated Construction Provides Cooler Interior SWAB Wagon Company,lnco ELIZABETHVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA 17023 — Phone 717 • 362.8151 "Continuous Service Since 1868" JONAS SWAB FOUNDER OF SWM'E WAGON WORKS. 1660 NOW SWAB WAGON CO., INC. INVENTOR or I CHILLED BOX STEEL AXLES ELIZASETHVILLE, PA. IN THE YEAR 1868 the SWAB WAGON COMPANY was founded by Jonas Swab, and it has been giving continuous service to the transportation industry ever since. The Company is located in the Borough of Elizabethville, in Dauphin County, SINCE Pennsylvania — just 28 miles north of Harrisburg, on U.S. Route 209 and Pennsyl- vania Route 225 in beautiful Lykens Valley. Although the area is an agricultural 1868 section, its proximity to the Industrial East makes it an ideal Pennsylvania Dutch community in which to live and to work. The population of Elizabethville is approximately 1500, and in 1967 the community celebrated its Sesquicentennial. SWAB WAGON COMPANY first started in business as manufacturers of horse- drawn vehicles — principally the widely known SWAB Farm Wagon. With the advent of the motorized vehicle the transition was gradually made to manufacture of truck bodies; until today the Company is recognized as one of the East's leading manufacturers of custom-built truck bodies and other special equipment for the transportation industry. Together with Animal Rescue Bodies, Chick & Poult Transport Vans, the Company also manufactures Bookmobiles, Refrigerated Vans, Mobile Display Vans, Fire Crash and Rescue Bodies, Ambulances, and other specialized truck bodies. The Swab Motors Division is the area dealer for Chrysler, Plymouth and Valiant automobiles. The Corporation has always remained in the Jonas Swab family with his grandson Jonas Ben Margerum the current President of the Corporation. It has always been a family business with many father -son -brother relations being employed; so that today over 50 per cent of the work force is in this category. The Executive Officers of the Corporation are: J. B. Margerum, President; Anthony J. Margerum, Vice President; Mike B. Margerum, Treasurer, and Wm. P. Lehman, Secretary. It is the endeavor of the Management to carry on the tradition of Quality — Honesty — Integrity, as established by the Founder over a century ago. Specifications STANDARD MODEL ARF -12 ANIMAL RESCUE UNIT DIMENSIONS — Overall 931/2" long x 78" wide x 55" high above frame at rear wheels. DIMENSIONS — Mounted on chassis — 17'2" long x 84" high, tWill vary slighly depending on chassis used -1 Total Weight — 5,000 Lbs. COOLER INSIDE — Extensive tests have proven that the temperature within the compartments is at least 10 degrees cooler than outside. No longer is it necessary to experience a heat buildup within vehicle. CONSTRUCTION Tubular steel crossmembers — molded into bottom of unit. Full Fibreglass -reinforced Plastic construction throughout -- One-piece assembly. Sides skirted to center line of rear wheels. Compartments finished smooth, with rounded corners to facilitate cleaning. Recessed pan in front of each compartment, with 1" lip on front, and with drain hole in each compartment. Each compartment constructed separately, to prohibit contact by animals with animals in the adjoining compartments. Ladder and Net compartment longitudinally, between upper compartments, full length. Service door on rear. Compartment doors fitted with heavy galvanized steel mesh on inside, and with galvannealed louvred panels on outside. Screening and louvred panels easily removeable. All hinges and latches of stainless steel with latches equipped with cylinder locks. All compartment doors keyed alike. All required body lights and reflectors, conforming to Federal Highway Safety Standards regulations. Rear chassis lights re -installed onto rear of body. Heavy pressed steel rear bumper installed. Mud and Splash Guards installed at rear wheels Mounted onto chassis in approved manner, using 6 U -bolts to provide secure mounting. Easy transfer to new chassis at any time. Color is White. Other colors can be applied by washing with solvent, sanding lightly, and applying enamels. Constructed with extra strength to resist damage, but if repairs are needed it is a simple operation. Merely clean damaged areas and fiil in with plastic body filler as used by all auto body repair shops. WEIGHT — Unit complete — 1,200 pounds. CHASSIS REQUIREMENTS Standard chassis with cab. Approximatel 5,400- G.V.W. rating. Wheelbase to provide 54" c - o -ax (CA) dimension. "Low Profile" 8.75 x 16.5 tires, single rear. Other items at customer's option. OPTIONAL ITEMS Dual -fan Fresh Air Blower — Provides 675 -CFM of fresh cooling air, evenly distributed to all compartments. Moving air cools animals. Stale air expelled through door louvres. Federal Model 184 4 -Beam Revolving Light. Available in red, blue, green, or amber lens. 93/4" high x 111/2" diameter. Federal FB -2 "Fire Ball" revolving flashing light. Availa- ble in red, blue, green or amber lens. 41,121' high x 41/2" x 6:i':" Unity AG -12" sealed -beam flood light, mounted on swivel base. 6" diameter lens. 8" high. Duo -Safety Model 35 jack-knife "A" ladder. Opens to 14 feet. Closes to 7 feet. Lettering and Artwork— to specifications. Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Height Compartments Number Wide x Nigh x Deep Area Volume Above Ground UPPER 6 26" 18" 301/2" 5.51 8.26 58%" LOWER FRONT 2 26" 30" 37 " 6.61 16.54 26 LOWER CENTER. 2 26" 24" 37 " 6.61 13.32 32 LOWER REAR 2 26" 24" 37 " 6.61 13.32 32 REAR LADDER/NET 1 12" 22" 93 " 58'/2" DIMENSIONS — Mounted on chassis — 17'2" long x 84" high, tWill vary slighly depending on chassis used -1 Total Weight — 5,000 Lbs. COOLER INSIDE — Extensive tests have proven that the temperature within the compartments is at least 10 degrees cooler than outside. No longer is it necessary to experience a heat buildup within vehicle. CONSTRUCTION Tubular steel crossmembers — molded into bottom of unit. Full Fibreglass -reinforced Plastic construction throughout -- One-piece assembly. Sides skirted to center line of rear wheels. Compartments finished smooth, with rounded corners to facilitate cleaning. Recessed pan in front of each compartment, with 1" lip on front, and with drain hole in each compartment. Each compartment constructed separately, to prohibit contact by animals with animals in the adjoining compartments. Ladder and Net compartment longitudinally, between upper compartments, full length. Service door on rear. Compartment doors fitted with heavy galvanized steel mesh on inside, and with galvannealed louvred panels on outside. Screening and louvred panels easily removeable. All hinges and latches of stainless steel with latches equipped with cylinder locks. All compartment doors keyed alike. All required body lights and reflectors, conforming to Federal Highway Safety Standards regulations. Rear chassis lights re -installed onto rear of body. Heavy pressed steel rear bumper installed. Mud and Splash Guards installed at rear wheels Mounted onto chassis in approved manner, using 6 U -bolts to provide secure mounting. Easy transfer to new chassis at any time. Color is White. Other colors can be applied by washing with solvent, sanding lightly, and applying enamels. Constructed with extra strength to resist damage, but if repairs are needed it is a simple operation. Merely clean damaged areas and fiil in with plastic body filler as used by all auto body repair shops. WEIGHT — Unit complete — 1,200 pounds. CHASSIS REQUIREMENTS Standard chassis with cab. Approximatel 5,400- G.V.W. rating. Wheelbase to provide 54" c - o -ax (CA) dimension. "Low Profile" 8.75 x 16.5 tires, single rear. Other items at customer's option. OPTIONAL ITEMS Dual -fan Fresh Air Blower — Provides 675 -CFM of fresh cooling air, evenly distributed to all compartments. Moving air cools animals. Stale air expelled through door louvres. Federal Model 184 4 -Beam Revolving Light. Available in red, blue, green, or amber lens. 93/4" high x 111/2" diameter. Federal FB -2 "Fire Ball" revolving flashing light. Availa- ble in red, blue, green or amber lens. 41,121' high x 41/2" x 6:i':" Unity AG -12" sealed -beam flood light, mounted on swivel base. 6" diameter lens. 8" high. Duo -Safety Model 35 jack-knife "A" ladder. Opens to 14 feet. Closes to 7 feet. Lettering and Artwork— to specifications. n ;G Q C7 [Ti M C) -0 i C A rm a T 5 0 CD cr CD li CD I ' CD to + ! t✓ 40 ►-3 I C � � [ill It j, I . ' O TJ zea) 7 > m o I N `0 ►-+ 1--' t -J t� 1-+ h -j :�b t C D D Y Z .. CD CD CD I CD 0 CD CD CD CD 'CJ b cn Y cn zc cn in -rk cn ►� wn H. wn wn wn wn w� `ry fF O 0 f' O rr 0 Pt• 0 ::r O f* O `ry H. iD CD F-+ O CD O 1-4 CD P -A as ov w tz to w w tzt to w w w 00 0O CD z0 CD a0 t= t7 �w ez✓y nw w nw w nw r_,+ CD CD 0 ►i N to �7'0 ►i cn K CD Fi Cn 11 CD ►i , w w a �-m�• cL CD CL 0. CDC. CL 14 ~•P � CD (1)CD cD 3 C+ f'+ O G• CD 'J f t N• Cn ►-+ F-+ c • +J ql 'TJ O I ft w O• �+ N Q' iD p. 1 .C-1 N 1 ON 1 cn ipip 1I W <D n F-1 O s n � rI 0 w .._.� e.._._ w cD �-4! x to N• oa w O N 1 CD Cn CD r+ n w n w ¢ cn I C+ K N•; `C :j1 � w i 1--1 H+• p to ql a, w CD ! CD H. C+ CD 0 F-+ 1 1 pql C P) CD O O t:� CD C7 C- CD _ I w 'o —rrl I qu H Cl C. a cwn ( 0 0 x 00 O r+• w cn Pt• O O Ii CD CD ••3 to w to to H. to CL 1 CD �-A o M i r N �z v wfl+ - ►i -3 0 o k CD cD ►� P x R f* H. ►•i 0 �� p cn so .P 1 .P. b •4. W O N 1 V O N O> O% W q0 V W 1 w V j V a\ tG a z CD 'T7 m to O ON uq 1 I W N CC Cho t0 V Pb ¢+ 1 i V to W to OA N crt O • a+ _`� • n r•-1 c� o ;a pr CD 0 o m$Z CD f+ moo Nv .� L 4 C* SS 1'•1 1 1 (,rl 1 •� W 1 N 14 0 C-3' It 1 1 N V1 4b1 111 W c :D O A> • t. n• CD n �'_--� O O CD ? I O i w tJ W_"_j_ 0 1 O I 1 Z P- y I O ( O • . 1 r v ` CD _ co n ;G Q C7 [Ti M C) -0 i C A rm a T 5 0 CD cr CD li CD I ' CD to + ! t✓ 40 ►-3 I C � � [ill It j, M COLONEL E. P. GILL CHIEF OF POLICE E. T. SMITH CAPTAIN OF DETECTIVES W. E. MARTIN CAPTAIN OF POLICE C O U N T Y O F CH ESTER F I E L D CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA POLICE D E P A R T M ENT June 11, 1973 Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Gentlemen: I would like to recommend the appointments of twenty men begining July 1, 1973 and extending through June 31, 1974 for the Auxiliary Police with Special Police powers. Names and recommendations of the twenty men are on pages one and two of the attached letter. EPG/jc Respectfully submitted, Colonel E. P. Gill Chief of Police u COLONEL E. P. GILL. CHIEF OF POLICE C O UN T Y Colonel E. P. Gill Chief of Police M E. T. SMITH CAPTAIN OF DETECTIVES W. E. MARTIN CAPTAIN OF POLICE O F C H E S T E R F I E L D CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA POLICE DEPARTM ENT Ref: Auxiliary Appointments for 1973-74 Sir: June 1, 1973 I wish to recommend the following officers for re -appointment: 1- Unit 179 J. W. Keesling 9- Unit 188 E. Eggleston,Sr. 2- Unit 181 J. E. Graham 10- Unit 190 W. M. McClintock 3- Unit 182 A. L. Hammell 11- Unit 192 B. R. Young 4- Unit 183 G. L. Hood 12- Unit 193 J. F. Wood 5- Unit 184 J. F. Clayton, Jr. 13- Unit 194 H. M. Self, Jr. 6- Unit 185 0. C. Graves 14- Unit 195 C. R. Watson 7- Unit 186 J. R. Beavers 15- Unit 198 R. L. Vaughan 8- Unit 187 W. M. Colbert I wish to recommend the following men for initial appointment: I- John Burley Edens, III Age 37, Married with one child. Holds Masters Degree from East Tennessee State University and is working on Doctorate requirements. Presently employed, since September, 1960, with Chester- field School Board. 2- Richard Moore King, Jr. Age 26, Married with one child. Holds Bachelor Degree from University of Mississippi. Presently employed, since 1/72, with Chesterfield School System as Teach -Coach at Matoaca High and Carver Junior High. 3- Gus Scottman Shipley Age 39, Married with two children. Has completed three ,years of college at Middle Tennessee University. Is District Sales Manager for Shipley Company. He has long been active in Auxiliary Police service around the country and has served as Training Officer and also Chief of one Auxiliary Unit in Colorado. 4- Lynwood Neal Morris Age 28, Married with two children. Is High School graduate. Is a Truck Driver for Overnite since 1968 working all graveyard shift. He is active in church, Masonic Lodge, Scottish Rite, n n Shrine and Eastern Star. He is an avid shooter and re -loads his own ammunition. 5- James Kenneth Andrews Age 57, Was with the old Civil Defense Organ- ization and then the Auxiliary from its inception. He resigned 5/5/70 due to health reasons but is now well and healthy and wishes to resume his duties with the auxiliary. The re -appointment of 15 men plus the appointment of 5 new men will bring us back to full authorized strength of 20 men. Respectfully, CLI,�A Mason T. al kl ey Detective Sergeant MTC/jc ya 4 IN ACCOUNT WITH WILLIAMS, MULLEN & CHRISTIAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW COURTHOUSE SOUARE CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 June 12, 1973 County of Chesterfield Mr. M. W. Burnett Executive Secretary For professional services rendered in the case of Bradley v. School Board of the City of Richmond, et als (Per attached schedule) From October 16, 1971 to June 1, 1973 $ 51, 337.50 EXPENSES ADVANCED: Zerox copies $ 139.90 Samuel W. Phillips, Clerk docket fee 25.00 Walter E. Rogers filing notice trip to Chicago 158.93 Walter E. Rogers- Washington 30.75 C. G. Keessee, Jr. Research 125.00 Walter E. Rogers -Washington 42.34 F. T. Gray -Washington 50.38 Long distance phone calls to Chicago, Blackstone & Wash. 39.59 Total Expenses: 611.89 51, 949.39 n M Record of professional services rendered in case of Bradley v. School Board of the City of Richmond in application for stay of District Courts Order in Court of Appeals for Fourth Circuit, Brief and appearances in Fourth Circuit, designation and preparation of record in U. S. Supreme Court, brief and appearance in I.T. S. Supreme Court. Services of Frederick T. Gray, designated by (G) by Walter E. Rogers designated by (R). Period covered is from October 16, 1971 to June 1, 1973. 1971 11-24 Study briefs in Emporia case (G) 1.5 11-30 Telephone conference Mcllwaine re. Emporia .25 12-7 Study Emporia Appeal (G) 2.0 1972 1-6 Calls from Judge Merhige, Byrne & Rogers confer (G) 2.0 1-10 Merhige opinion - study - confer other counsel -confer Boards (G) 8.0 (R) 8.0 1-11 Study opinion - confer other counsel (R) 7.0 1-12 Attorney conference re opinion (R) 2.0 1-13 Preliminary work on Motion for Stay (R) 5.0 1-14 Preliminary work on Motion for Stay (R) 5. 0 1-15 Preliminary work on Motion for Stay (R) 5.0 1-16 (Sunday) Drafting Motion for Stay (R) 5.0 (G) 7.5 1-17 Work on Stay (R) 7.5 1-18 Work on Stay (G) 2.5 1-19 Study Denial of Stay (R) 7.0 (G) 2.0 1-20 Confer with Attorney General et al re Stay in Fourth Circuit (R) 8.0 (G) 1.5 1-21 Confer Gravatt prepare motion for stay (R) 7.0 (G) 8.0 1-22 Drafting Motion for Stay (G) 11.0 (R) 7.0 1-23 (Sunday) Drafting Motion -Conference all counsel (R) 9.0 (G) 13.0 1-24 Work on Stay (R) 8.0 (G) 11.5 1-25 Work on Stay (R) 10.0 1-26 Conference on hiring outside expert counsel (R) 2.0 (G) 2.0 1-27 Conference Atty. General re. stay (R) 2.5 (G) 2.5 1-28 Conf Atty General on Stay (R) 3.5 1-29 Study Merhige opinion and order (G) 4. 0 1-30 Conference Henrico & Chesterfield Boards of Supervisors (R) 6.0 (G) 5.0 1-31 Preparation of Motion and Brief (R) 4.0 2-1 Preparation of Motion and Brief (R) 7.0 2-1 Night meeting two Boards of Supervisors (G) 4.0 2-2 Brief on Stay (R) 8.0 %W `400 Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond Page 2 2-3 Draft resolutions to accompany Motion (R) 8.0 ( G) 1.0 2-4 Conference and preparation of Resolutions of appointments to "Metro" Board (R) 2.0 (G) 3.0 2-5 Confer Rudy and Gravatt re Resolutions (G) 1.5 2-6 Conference all defense counsel (R) 4.0 (G) 4.5 2-7 Meet all counsel pre -hearing conference (G) 1.0 2-7 Meeting with Haynsworth-Post hearing conference (G) 2.25 2-7 Conference counsel Paul Byrne's office (R) 6.5 2-7 Conference Bd. of Supervisors (G) 2.0 Miscellaneous meetings during General Assembly Session (G) 20.0 (Est) 2-9 Petition for Stay Fourth Circuit (R) 2.0 2-10 Conference Broaddus re. Brief (R) 5.0 2-11 Reviewing record in Clerk's Office (R) 3.0 2-18 Conference in Washington D. C. re expert (R) 8.0 2-21 Confer. Kay, Broaddus, Byrne re. Emporia case (R) 2.0 2-24 Conference Byrne, McIlwaine, Broaddus, White (R) 2.5 2-28 Call Gravatt, Rudy, Confer Broaddus (R) 2.0 2-29 Work on Fourth Circuit Brief (R) 4.0 3-1 Conference defense counsel re. brief (R) 4.0 3-2 Work in Attorney General's office - call Kurland (R) 4.0 3-3 Work on Brief Fourth Circuit (R) 3.0 3-5 Conference Gray, McIlwaine, Lacy (R) 4.0 3-6 Briefing (R) 3.5 3-7 Briefing (R) 3.5 3-8 Briefing (R) 2.0 3-9 Briefing in Byrne's office (R) 8.5 3-10 Griefing in Attorney General's office (R) 8.0 3-11 Work on Brief-Att. Generals office (R) 8.0 3-12 Work on Brief-Att. Generals office (R) 8.0 3-13 Work on Brief-Att. Generals office (R) 8.0 3-14 Work on Brief-Att. Generals office (R) 8.0 3-14 Prepare to confer with Kurland (G) 6. 0 3-15 To Washington with Kurland (G) 12.0 3-15 Work on Brief (R) 8.0 3-16 Work on Brief (R) 8.0 ( G) 14.5 3-17 Work on Brief (R) 8.0 (G) 13.5 3-18 Work on Brief (R) 12.0 (G) 14.0 3-19 Work on Brief (G) 4.0 3-20 Work on Brief (G) 5.0 3-21 Work on Brief (G) 6.0 3-22 Confer board re Kurland (G) 1.75 3-23 Conference Atty. Generals office re counsel (G) 3.0 (R) 2.0 3-24 Conference Attorney Generals office (R) 3.0 3-27 Study Plaintiffs Brief ( G) 1.0 3-27 Conference Attorney Generals office (R) 3.0 Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond Page 3 3-28 Study Plt. Brief confer Atty. Gen's office (R) 5.0 (G) 3.5 3-29 Work on Brief (R) 4.0 3-30 Confer Atty. Generals office- work on brief (R) 3.0 (G) 4.0 3-31 Call Burnett -Call Court (G) .25 3-31 Work on Brief (R) 6.0 4-1 Reply Brief (R) 2.0 (G) 12.25 4-2 To Washington (R) 2.0 4-3 Confer in Washington work on brief at night (R) 10.0 4-5 Report on progress- Wilkerson (R) 3.0 4-7 Conference Atty. General, Woodrow Wilkerson, et al (R) 4.0 4-8 Reply to charges of delay (R) 4.0 4-8 Confer Atty. General- Wilkerson report (R) 5.0 4-9 Reply to charges of delay (G) .5 4-10 Confer McIlwayne & Byrne (G) 1.0 4-11 Confer Atty. Generals office - re. Kurland Agreement (G) 2.5 (R) 2.5 4-12 Conference Kurland re. his argument (G) 3.0 (R) 3.0 4-13 Preparation - Hearing in Fourth Circuit - post hearing conf. (R) 4.0 (G) 5.5 5-15 Call McIlwayne-work on continuing plan (R) 1.0 6-7 Study Fourth Circuit Opinion (G) 1.5 6-21 Reviewed opinion (R) 2.0 7-5 Calls re costs (G) .5 7-27 Conference Atty. Generals office re District case (R) 2.5 (G) 2.0 7-28 Conference McIlwaine - call Miller (R) 1.5 7-31 Conference McIlwaine re. Motion to Extend Time (R) 3.0 8-1 Conference McIlwaine re opposition to Motion (R) 2.5 8-2 Drafting Answer to Motion to extend (R) 1.0 8-3 Conference re Richmond delay & our response (G) 5.5 (R) 5.5 8-7 Confer with Board of Supervisors (G) .5 8-8 Confer Atty. General - call Kurland (G) 3.0 8-9 Confer Bd. of Supervisors re Richmond's request for delay ( G) .5 8-11 Conference re Amended Order (G) .25 (R) 1.0 8-17 Call re NAACP request for Stay (G) .5 9-22 Counsel conference Atty. Generals office (G) 1.0 (R) 2.0 10-6 Study Citys Brief (R) 3.0 10-8 Confer Atty. Generals office re. City Pet. (R) 4.0 10-11 To Washington - Study Plt. Pet. (R) 4.0 (G) 3.0 10-12 In Washington - To Supreme Court for Rodrigiz & Denver and conference with Kurland (R) 7.0 (G) 8.0 10-13 Study Merhige opinion for points Kurland wants (R) 3.0 10-16 Conference - calls re. refusal to expedite - call Kurland (R) 2.5 (G) .5 10-20 Review Kurland brief (R) 2.5 10-22 Conference Attorney Generals office re brief in opposition (R) 6.0 (G) 6.0 10-26 To Washington - confer Kurland et al Brief in opposition (G) 8.0 Bradley v. School Board City of Richmond Page 4 11-1 Work on brief in opposition (R) 3.0 (G) 5.5 11-7 Calls re Merhige request to employ Little (G) 1.0 12-26 Work on Brief (R) 3.0 1973 1-18 Attorney Conference (R) 1.0 1-22 Calls (R) . 5 1-24 Study record (R) 2.0 1-25 Study record (R) 2.5 1-28 Read transcript - designate record (G) 4.0 1-30 Read transcript - designate record (R) 3.0 1-31 Read transcript - designate record (R) 6.0 2-1 Read transcript - designate record confer Henrico officials (R) 2.0 (G) 7.0 2-2 Read transcript - designate record (R) 7.0 2-5 It if (G) 1.5 2-5 To Washington -check record - confer Kurland (R) 10.0 2-6 Designate record (R) 2.5 (G) 2.0 2-16 Conference Atty. Generals office (R) 2.5 (G) 2.0 2-18 Conference Atty. Generals office (R) 2.5 2-20 Work on Summary (R) 1.0 2-22 Preparation of Statement of case (R) 5.0 2-27 Confer Atty Generals office re. statement (R) 1.5 3-2 Confer Mcllwaine (G) 2.0 Miscallaneous times during General Assembly (G) 10.0 (est) 3-5 Study briefs (R) 3.0 3-5 Call to Rogers re. briefs (G) .25 3-6 Study briefs (R) 3.0 (G) 2.0 3-7 Study briefs (R) 3.0 (G) 6.0 3-8 Study Briefs - confer Atty. Gen (R) 3.5 (G) 6.0 3-9 Conference in Washington re. brief (R) 7.0 (G) 10.5 3-11 Study NAACP brief (G) 2.5 3-15 Study for brief (R) 3.0 3-16 Work on brief (R) 6.0 (G) 4.0 3-17 Work on brief (R) 6.0 (G) 5.0 3-18 Work on brief (R) 4.0 (G) 7.0 3-19 Work on brief (R) 5.0 (G) 3.0 3-20 Confer Atty. Gen re. Kurlands brief (R) 5.0 (G) 3.0 3-21 Confer Atty. Gen re. Kurlands brief (R) 5.0 3-22 Work on brief - revising Kurlands (R) 6.0 (G) 6.0 3-23 Work on brief - Byrne Is office (R) 8.0 (G) 8.0 3-24 (Saturday) work on brief -Byrnes office (R) 8.0 Bradley v. School Board City of Richmond Page 5 3-25 (Sunday) work on brief - Byrnes office (R) 5.0 (G) 9.5 3-26 work on brief -call U. S. Marshall (R) 5.0 (G) .5 3-27 Work on brief (R) 7.0 (G) 3.0 3-28 Work on brief (R) 16 (G) 15.5 3-29 Final work on brief (R) 10.0 (G) 10.5 4-22 To Washington confer Kurland et al (G) 9.0 4-23 In U. S. Supreme Court (G) 9.0 5-11 Conference in D. C. re. remedy in case of reversal (G) 10.0 M M. W. Burnett, County Administrator Chesterfield Court House Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Sir: M 5129 U}. Rock Spring Drive Richmond, Virginia 23234 June 12, 1973 Please bring before the Board of Supervisors my request for permission to put on a fireworks di?play at the Salisbury Country Club on July 4, 1973 at apnroy5mately 9:00 p.m. Yours truly, Ra and M. Spr se ^► 1;;11973 RECEIVE QD, Ort�`►dg�S1"7 �` CN�S1Eai1 -� IIIIIW��noun Chesterfield COM1,41 public Schools Dl WOM o/ AdiuiNistratiay ONd Nrsotiye! TO: MR....aC� ERT A LUX 15 Adiffildstratiolf G'elfter Chesterfield, vlroh a 23832 +► (703) 748-1405 June 13, 1973 FROM: T. R. FULGHUM SUBJECT: TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM INSTRUCTION TO TRANSPORTATION Divisiom Aperimteodemt Dr. Kobert 7 Kelly The request for the above mentioned transfer has been necessitated by the employment of additional school bus drivers on both special education and regular bus routes during the 1972-73 session. These additional buses had not been originally anticipated and were necessitated by excess over- crowded school buses in certain rapidly growing sections of the county. Additionalunexpected expenditures arose in the area of school bus maintenance where a large number of older vehicles required excessive repairs throughout the 1972-73 session. I will be glad to furnish additional information if it is deemed necessary. I would like also to point out that the transfer requested in no way reflects purchase of equipment or supplies that have not been necessary to complete the 1972-73 school session. Sam Kornblau President Herman F. Blake, Jr. First Vice President Roy Rogers, III Vice President -Bull der J. B. Hall, Jr. Vice President -Associate Harry C. Seibold, Jr. Secretary H. Massie Burger, Jr., Treasurer "OVOILDERS ASSOCIATION OF RN*41MOND �5*t4enWf.ra� 2311 WESTWOOD AVE. • RICHMOND, VA. 23230 TELEPHONE (703) 359.3241'` `{ �' f844 ES May 14, 1973 Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Mel: John D. Davenport, Executive Vice Pres. Catherine S. Shoemaker, Asst. Exec. Secretary r f ��. L;., tt i b i�i�1t Re: Fire Hydrants on Multi -Family Construction, Chesterfield County The Legislative Committee of Home Builders Association of Richmond has held a series of meetings since receiving your letter of April 18, 1973. As in the past, we are pleased to cooperate with Chester- field County and offer the following points for your consideration: Fire hazards during construction are the total responsibility of the builder/developer and he does not expect the County to assume any liability. At the time of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for a given building in a particular area of a project, water service shall be available for fire protection. Our investigation of fire insurance premium rates indicate that savings for 3rd class protection v. 4th class protection would be negligible. As you know, 3rd and 4th class protection is the coverage available on multi -family construction in Chesterfield County. The installation of a fire hydrant system is largely dependent upon weather conditions during the early stages of construction in a multi -family housing project. If unfavorable weather occurs, it could easily prevent the start of waterline construction on the site for many months. In many cases, building construction can proceed during adverse weather conditions. To delay all phases of building construction until watermain completion could create an extreme financial burden upon the builder/developer. n Mr. W. M. Burnett -2- May 14, 1973 If the installation of fire hydrants was completed, a system of roads would have to be installed for the purpose of fire trucks driving to a particular area, if their use was required. Because many utilities are located beneath the roadways, the builder/developer could be forced to complete substantially all utilities and roadways before starting with the building construction. For the stated reasons, we do not feel that it is practical or feasible to establish a policy prohibiting builders/developers from constructing multi -family dwellings until on-site fire hydrants are available. We endorse the prevailing County Policy of providing reasonable fire protection at the time of occupancy. We further endorse the present policy for spacing on site fire hydrants as good engineering practice and to be available for use at occupancy. We commend the fine efforts of the Chesterfield County Fire Bureau and the Board of Supervisors in their sincere concern for adequate fire protection throughout the County. The entire member- ship of our Association will be advised of the County's concern and awareness of the need for adequate fire protection and will be asked to cooperate with the County to this end. Sincerely yours, John D. Davenport Executive Vice President M BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IRVIN G. HORNER, CHAIRMAN CLOVER HILL DISTRICT LEO MYERS. VICE CHAIRMAN BERMUDA DISTRICT C O U N T Y n BOARD OF SUPERVISORS J. RUFFIN APPERSON DALE DISTRICT ALDRICH J.KREPELA MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT E. MERLIN O'NEILL, SR. MATOACA DISTRICT O F C H E S T E R F I E L D CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA M. W. BURNETT EXECUTIVE SECRETARY April 2, 1973 Mr. M.W. Burnett County Administrator County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Burnett: On February 15, 1973, the Fire Chief's Association agreed to request the Board of Supervisors to adopt an ordinance that would prohibit builders from puttin sheathin or roof de king on multi-familywe Ings up to t ree stories hi h until fire hydrants on the project site are � aced in service On March 23, 1973, a fire occurred in the Edgehill Apartment Project, 10,000 Iron Mill Road which again pointed out the need for such a requirement. I would appreciate if you would give consideration to such a requirement,Mr. Manuel viewed the fire scene right after the fire was brought under control and is aware of our need. Enclosed is a copy of Battalion Chief Barfield's letter to me pointing out items that reduced the effectiveness of the fire department. Thank you for your interest. Sincerely, Robe t L. E es Chief of Department CHESTERFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT RLE :wmh cc: Mr. Leo Myers Board of Supervisors Enclosure: (1) CHESTERFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT / CHESTERFIELD. VIRGINIA ROBERT L. EANES CHIEF OF DEPARTMENT DAVID E. BARFIELD FIRE MARSHAL March 30, 1973 Chief Robert L. Eanes Chesterfield Fire Department Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Chief Eanes : In reference to the fire that occurred in the Edgehill Apartment Project, ?March 23, the following are items of significance that reduced the effectiveness of the fire department: 1. Lack of fire hydrants: No hydrants had been provided (as of the date of the fire) in the portion of the project where the fire occurred. The closest hydrant was approximately 1200 feet from the building involved. Other portions of the project will be some 1500 to 1800 feet from hydrant protection. 2. Poor access to fire building: Allowing for the fact this project is under construction and expected to be crowded with building materials, I feel this project is much worse than the average one in providing access to the buildings. We were fortunate that the fire occurred where it did. Had it been on the west side of the horseshoe no vehicles could have approached the buildings and hand lines would have had to be dragged as far as 300 to 400 feet just to reach the front of the buildings. The aerial ladder could not be used at all because it could not be placed close enough to the fire building to reach the roof. The new 100 foot aerial ladder will help eliminate this problem. 3. Natural terrain features of project: The Edgehill Pro- ject is built on a series of natural ridges and while it may have aesthetic value, the design of this project presents fire protection problems that are not just in- convenient, they're impossible. The portion of the project in which the fire occurred has absolutely no access from the rear. The ground slopes downward so steep that at some points it almost approaches being a cliff. Aerial equipment cannot be used and ground s Page 2 ladders will be virtually impossible to set on such terrain. The major part of Edgehill is a horseshoe arrangement connected together. In some instances firefighters will have to travel on foot as much as 600 feet just to walk to the rear of the horseshoe. There will be only 2 or 3 physical openings through which firefighting personnel can get to the rear of the apartments. Should occupants become trapped in these apartments as they were in the Treetop fire, the fire department will be faced with an almost impossible rescue task. Even if we are able to set ground ladders it will take an unacceptable length of time and will be physically punishing to men to tran- sport and set the ladders. I have given consideration to these problems and I don't feel the fire department is unreasonable in requesting at least the minimum basic items necessary for fire protection. I think Chief Finnigan summed it up when he arrived at Edgehill and commented to me, "how in the hell do you people fight fire in a mess like this." Sincerely, , David E. Barfield Battalion Chief i In April 2, 1973 Mr. M.W. Burnett County Administrator County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Burnett: On February 15, 19730 the Fire Chief's Association agreed to request the Board of Supervisors to adopt an ordinance that would prohibit builders from putting sheathing or roof decking on multifamily dwellings up to three stories high until fire hydrants on the project site are placed in service. On March 23, 19739 a fire occurred in the Edgehill Apartment Project, 10,000 Iron Mill Road which again pointed out the need for such a requirement. I would appreciate if you would give consideration to such a requirement..Mr. Manuel viewed the fire scene right after the fire was brought under control and is aware of our need. Enclosed is a copy of Battalion Chief Barfield's letter to as pointing out items that reduced the effectiveness of the fire department. Thank you for your interest. Sincerely, Robert L. Eanes • a'"� Chief of Department CHESTERFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT RLE:wmh cc: r. Leo Myers Board of Supervisors Enclosure: (1) 4 k CHESTERFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT / CHESTERFIELD, ROBERT L EANES CHIEF OF DEPARTMENT DAVID E- BARFIELD FIRE MARSHAL March 30, 1973 Chief. Robert L. Eanes Chesterfield Fire Department Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 VIRGINIA Dear Chief Eanes : In reference to the fire that occurred in the Edgehill Apartment Project, March 23, the following are items of significance that reduced the effectiveness of the fire department: 1. Lack of fire hydrants: No hydrants had been provided (as of the date of the fire) in the portion of the project where the fire occurred. The closest hydrant was approximately 1200 feet from the building involved. Other portions of the project will be some 1500 to 1800 feet from hydrant protection. 2. Poor access to fire building: Allowing for the fact this project is under construction and expected to be crowded with building materials, I feel this project is much worse than the average one in providing access to the buildings. Ile were fortunate that the fire occurred where it did. Had it been on the west side of the horseshoe no vehicles could have approached the buildings and hand lines would have had to be dragged as far as 300 to 400 feet just to reach the front of the buildings. The aerial ladder could not be used at all because it could not be placed close enough to the fire building to reach the roof. The new 100 foot aerial ladder will help eliminate this problem. 3. Natural terrain features of project: The Edgehill Pro- ject is built on a series of natural ridges and while it may have aesthetic value, the design of this project presents fire protection problems that are not just in- convenient, they're impossible. The portion of the project in which the fire occurred has absolutely no access from the rear. The ground slopes downward so steep that at some points it almost approaches being a cliff. Aerial equipment cannot be used and ground Page 2 ladders will be virtually impossible to set on such terrain. The major part of Edgehill is a horseshoe arrangement connected together. In some instances firefighters will have to travel on foot as much as 600 feet just to walk to the rear of the horseshoe. There will be only 2 ors physical openings through which firefighting personnel can get to the rear of the apartments. Should occupants become trapped in these apartments as they were in the Treetop fire, the fire department will be faced with an almost impossible rescue task. Even if we are able to set ground ladders it will take an unacceptable length of time and will be physically punishing to men to tran- sport and set the ladders. I have given consideration to these problems and I don't feel the fire department is unreasonable in requesting at least the minimum basic items necessary for fire protection. I think Chief Finnigan summed it up when he arrived at Edgehill and commented to me, "how in the hell do you people fight fire in a mess like this." Sincerely, David E. Barfield Battalion Chief )c Mli P 11 COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA April 180 1973 Mr, John Davenport Executive Vice -President Home Builders Association of Richmond 2311 Westwood Avenue Richmondq Virginia 23230 Dear John: The Districts Fire Chiefs of the County of Chester- field have suggested to the Board of Supervisors that a policy be established to prohibit builders from constructing multi -family dwellings until fire hydrants to be on the project are in services Such a request was no doubt generated by the recent fire in the Edgehill Apartments at which approximately 1200 feet of fire hose had to be laid. The Supervisor asked that I submit this to you and your group for your consideration* tiroould the benefits that would accrue due to a close proximity of fire hydrants outweigh the hazards of fire? is this too much to ask of a builder? How can we give reasonable fire protection with few or distant fire hydrants? These are some of you to consider and share we do appreciate your help MOB : w the questions which with us your thinking in these matters* Sincerelyt we would like and counsel. m. W. Burnett County Administrator cN +• ,,e -r- em jrecati` MaIo, e 3.IY1.3 r !t A I� • N r1L 7Z l�r/1 t /l Are ✓4 tA A4 A -i 0 sG kdoe root✓�+`-e,n vre . J4 le — I& t � e — oo 4r,W.. I &a-0- .0 pwl rc�I- a A .?J-ao -? / — OPW �.��y�1 — S3 o•c � a wet' Cd&*,je V AN;wI L1 J� i . 41 I y R w fOf �•��s c�a K oJ- f-ca.rr�-- r IU"00, 1 C INS • � T r � � ,e G r An �lS IZ.Cwe`r„�Qt..,r Q bD '7 �Dce7'v •ZLi. 0 �` / _L. , .'_ 1i_ L lam /%%✓ ��t/l .r / N %'"�J/��I � �N �I �LI�% �iyI'N b bio✓Ki e'il r!/%�s� �'1"�:'� IMmMm&^,Xl Grs S� c•k.c,r ; SVS} o w J MR.;wl_� 4 w+ o ✓mss s S .�a w 1 Ji 17.1 r . •qu • • • i rip ..�� �/ acu. _1r t _� �� �O 4 I.J �I P.✓ C..�t�G!✓�i �yl,F�s,� ��1'ti�o S J � dew. ;Lc) lA,{q r A. 6 �e rove ,� .�►Sv6 '¢�f �c 4Yr4-4-vq_ Ze 74441— tlCOW -00 /L • 1�1511711--Irlrll - Ell /Iisif W- -0 2no4wz:,iAZ;fflw"ffrrAm t �► 1iii.� /!i /fid` W., .� /'/.lave a �'� • RIP . �u d t �� 1 ATOG INK. -G A. f'= t T o,e� Da. ✓i s -�,r� r.«a 44 C aed 0"4e 11.4, i� -- r r Veer ClR �e,�. s v — s -- ✓. /� i�ers� /L�[.� vis. /%�.� O� 4!/ � - �-• ; `� ��� � /w� �" -' �•y Gam— '� l%� � �p 00 -r.0 4 e • V/ /s - �� • % • . i