10-24-1973 PacketVSRG=NSA: At an adjourned meeting of the
Board of Supervisors of ChestarField
County, rield at the Courthouse on
October 24, 1973 at 2=00 P.M.
Present. Also Prasente
Mr. =ruin G. HorTier, Chairmars Mr .Morn is Mason, Asst. Comm. Atty.
NIr. L00 Myers Vice-Criairman Nir. NI _w. Bur nett, Co. Administrator
Mr. J.RuFFin Appers on Mr. C_G _&�anue 3- o. Admire.
Mr Eng.
Mr. E.i�ierlin O•Nai11 avid Welchons, Asst. Co. Eng.
Ms. v7311 ism Pros isei lysst. Co. Eng.
Nr. Stan Balderson, Planner
CGn motion of Nir. Apperson.second ed by i�ir. Krapala, it is resolved
that the minutes of Uc tober 10. 1973 be, and t2-ie.y hereby are
appr ovad.
Ayes: Mr. Horner. Nir. Myers, Mr_ Ap par son• Nor .Krepala and 11Ir-O•Nei13-
.
On motion of Nir. Myers, seconded by Mr.O•Nai11, it is resolved that
the Following Ordinance bc. and it hereby is adopted c
AN to amend Chapter 6 of th Code of the Coign ty
of Ches tarf ie ld, Virginia, by adding thereto a new Article,
Article XS providing for disposition of abandoned motor vehic ies,
and new sections, Sections 6-228 througri 6-234; Section 6-228
providing For daf initions of certain words; Section 6-229 providing
For the County to talcs custody of abandoned motor veri icles and
employ personnel or contract For such service; Section 6-230
providing Fcr giving of notice to registered owner; Section 6-231
providing For sale of abandoned vehicle and d3s position of proceeds;
Section 6-232 providing for taking vehycles abandoned in gar ages
Section 6-233 providing for disposition of in opar able abandoned
vehicles and Section 6-234 providing for Burr ender of certificate
of title when vehicle to be demolished and records to be kept by
demolisher.
HE ST ORDA=NED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERV=SORS C=F THE COUNTY OF
CHESTS RF SELD, VSRG SN SAc
That Chapter 6 of the Code of the County of Chestarfield�
Virginia, be am._ndad and reordained by adding thereto a new
i-+rticla, - rticle CS, and new Sac tions, .Section 6-228 through 6-234,
to read as follows
ARTSCLE X=-Abandoned Niotor Vahic gas
Section 6-228 Definitions
%0 Nw.
1, gCounty" means County of Chesterfield
2. "Division` means Division of Motor Vehicles
3. "Abandoned motor vehicle" means a motor vehicle,trailer, or
semi -trailer or part thereof that:
(a) Is inoperable and is left unattended on public property
for more than forty-eight hours, or
(b) Has remained illegally or public property for a period
of more than forty-eight hours, or
(c) Has remained on private property without the consent of
the owner or person in control of the property for
more than forty-eight hours.
4. "Demolisher" means any person, firm or corporation whose business
is to convert a motor vehicle, trailer or semitrailer into
processed scrap or scrap metal or otherwise to wreck, or
dismantle such vehicles.
Section 6-229-County may take custc_dy
The County may take custody of any abandoned motor vehicle
and employ its otn personnel, equipment and facilities for such
purpose or employ independent contr;.ctors for the purpose of
removing, preserving and storing abandoned motor vehicles.
Seccion 6-230-Notice to be given owner
(a) When any motor vehicle is taken into custody the county
shall notify, within fifteen days thereof, by registered or
certified mail, return receipt requested, the owner of record of
the motor vehicle and all persons having security interests therein
of record, that the vehicle has been taken into custody. The
notice shall describe the year, make, model and serial number of
the abandoned motor vehicle, tet forth the location of the
facility where the motor vehicle is being held, inform the owner
and any persons having security interests of their right to
reclaim the motor vehicle within three weeks after the date of
the notice, upon payment of all towing, preservation and storage
charges resulting from placing the vehicle in custody, and state
that the failure of the owner or persons having security interests
to exercise their right to reclaim the vehicle within the time
provided shall be deemed a waiver by the owner and all persons
having security interests, of all right, title and interest in
the vehicle, and consent to the sale of the abandoned motor
vehicle at a public auction.
(b) If records of the Division contain no address for the
owner or no address of any person shown by such records to have
a security interest, or if the identity and addresses of the owner
and all persons having security interests cannot be determined with
reasonable certainty, notice by publication once in a newspaper of
general circulation in the area where the motor vehicle was abandoned
shall be sufficient to meet all requirements of notice pursuant to
-2-
this chapter as to any person who cannot be notified pursuant to
the provisions of patagraph (a) of this section. Such no Uce by
publication may contain multiple listings of abandoned motor
Vehicles. Any such notice shall be within the time requirements
prescribed for notice by mail and shall have the same contents
required for a notice by mail.
(c) The consequences and the fact of failure to reclaim an
abandoned motor vehicle shall be as set forth in a notice given in
accordance with and pursuant to this section.
Section 6-231 - Sale of vehicle; disposition of proceeds
If an ab�.ndoned motor vehicle has not been reclaimed as provided
for in Section 16-2307 the County, or its authorized agent, shall
notwithstanding the provisions of Section 46.1-88 of the Code of
Virginia, as amended, sell the abandoned motor vehicle at public
auction. The purchaser of the motor behicle shall take title to the
motor vehicle free and clear of all liens and claims of ownership
of others, shall receive a sales receipt at the auction and shall
be entitled to, upon application therefor pursuant to Section 46.1-68
of the Code of Virginia, as amended, a certificate of title and registra+ff
tion care therefor. The sales receipt at such a $glee shall be sufficient
title only for purposes of transferring the vehicle to a demolisher
for demolition, wrecking or dismantling;, and, in such case, no further
titling of the vehicle shall be necessary. From the proceeds of the
sale of an abandoned motor vehicle, the Cc-unty, or its authorized
agent, shall reimburse itself for the expenses of the auction, the
cost of towing, preserving and storing the vehicle which resulted from
placing the abandoned motor vehicle in custody, and all notice and
publication costs incurred pursuant to Section 6-230. Any remainder
from the proceeds of a sale shall be held for the owner of the abandoned
motor vehicle or any persons having security interests therein, as
their interests may appear, for ninety days, and then shall be
deposited into the treasury of the County wherein such abandoned
motor vehicle was abandoned.
Section 6-232-Vehicles abandoned in garages
Any motor vehicle, trailer, semi -trailer or part thereof left for
more than ten days in a garage operated for commercial purposes
after notice be registered or certified mail, return receipt requested,
to the owner to pick up the vehicle, or for more: than ten days after
the period Ohen, pursuant to contract, the vehicle was to remain on
the premises, shall be deemed an abandoned motor vehicle, and may be
reported by the garage keeper to the County. All abandoned motor
vehicles left in garages may be taken into custody by the Connty in
accordance with Section 6-229 and shall §e subject to the notice and
sale provisions contained in Sections 6-230 and 6-231; provided that
if such vehicle is reclaimed in accordance with Section 6-230, the
person reclaiming such vehicle shall, in addition to the other charges
required to be paid, pay the charges of the garage keeper, if any;
provided further, that if such vehicle is sold pursuant to Section
6-231, the garage keeper's charges, if any, shall be paid from, and
to the extent of the excess of the proceeds of sale after paying the
expenses of the auction, the costs of towing, preserving and storing
such vehicle which resulted from placing such vehicle in custody and
allnotice and publication costs incurred pursuant to Section 6-230.
-3-
M
M
Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, nothing h rein shall
be construed to limit or restrict any rights confdrred upon any
person under Sections 43-52 through 43-36 of the Code of Virginia,
as amended. For the purposes of this section,';garage keeper" means
any operator of a parking -place, motor vehicle storage facility,
or establishment for the servicing, repair or maintenance of motor
vehicles.
Section 6-233 - Disposition of inoperable abandoned behicles
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, or the
provisions of Section 46.1-88 of the Code of Virginia, as amended,
any motor vehicle, trailer, semi -trailer or part thereof which is
inoperable and which, by virtue of its condition, cannot be feasibly
restored to operable condition, may be disposed of to a demolisher,
without the title and without the notification procedures, by the
person, firm, corporation, or pokitical subdivision on whose property
or in whose possession such motor vehicle, trailer, or semi -trailer
is found. The demolisher, upon taking custody of such vehicle,
trailer, or semi -trailer shall notify the Division of v!otor Vehicles,
on forms and in the manner prescribed by the Commissioner and, notwith-
standing any other profrision of law, no other report or notice shall
be required in such instance.
Section 6-234 -Surrender of title certificate; records required
. by Demolisher
(a) Any demolisher who purchases or otherwise acquired a motor
vehicle for purposes of wrecking, dismantling or demolition shall
not be required to obtain a certificate of title for such motor
vehicle in his own name. After the motor vehicle has !-een demolished,
processed, or changed so that it physically is no longer a motor
vehicle, the demolisher shall surrender to the Division of Cancellation
the certificate of title or sales receipt therefor. The Division
shall issue such forms, rules and regulations governing the surrender
of sales receipts and certificates of title as are appropriate.
(b) A demolisher shall keep an accurate and complete record of
all moor vehicles purchased or received by him in the course of his
business. These records shall contain the name and address of the
person from whom each such motor vehicle was purchased or received
and the date when such purchases or receipts occurred. Such records
shall be open for inspection by the Division at any time during
normal business hours.
Ayes: Mr.Horner, Pair. Myers, Mr. Apperson, i•1r.Krepela and Nir.OtNeill.
On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr.Myers, it is resolved that
the followint water contracts be and they hereby are approved:
W73--76D Settlers Landing, Section B $ 3,957.00
W73-75D Falling Creek Industrial
Center, Phase 2 3,779.60
W73-77CD Otterdale, Section C 22,537.00
W73-73D Brighton Green,Section 13 6,432.40
Ayes: Mr. Horn,.:r, 1,1r. Myers, Mr. Krepela and P,,ir.O'Neill.
Nays: Mr. Apperson -4-
n
On motion of Mr.Krepela, seconded by P'ir. Apperson, it is resolved
that the Virginia Department of Highways be and it hereby is requested
to take into the Secondary System, roads in the following subdivisons:
(a) Chestnwt Hills, Sections B and C
(b) Lake Crystal Farms, Section G-
(c) Greenfield, Section H
(d) Bon Air Terrace Addition
Ayes: Mr.Horner, Mr. I-yers, Mr. Apperson, Ntr.KrL:pela and Mr.O'Neill.
On motion of Mr.Krepelap seconded by V.r. O'Neill it is resolved that
the County Drainage Engineer be authorized to get bids on a project
in the Greenfield Subdivision with the possibility that one-half
of the cost of this project be paid from the citizens of the area,
a portion from the County's General Fund and the remainder from the
3cr Road Fund of the County.
Ayes: i°ir. Horner, Mr. Iviyers, Mr. Apperson, Vir.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill.
On motion of Mr.Horner, seconded by iflr.:11pperson, it is resolved that
Contract 573-43C be and it is hereby awarded to the Stamie E. Lyttle
Company for the installation of trunk sewers on Beaverpond Branch
in the amount of $567' 616.�0.
Ayes: I�tr. Horner, Mr. T,yers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill.
On motion of Mr.Krepela, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that
the County Engineer be authorized to secure bids for the installation
of sewers in the Piohawk and Southampton areas and that the County
Engineer and the Supervisor in the District be requested to obtain
the easements in this area.
Ayes: Mr.Horner, P:r. Pv,yers, Mr.Apperson,Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill.
On motion of Mr. Horner, seconded by Pir.Myers, it is resolved that
certain County employees who worked overtime to engineer the sewers
for the Springhill and Gatewood sewer project be paid this charge,
which in total amounts to $2806.14.
Ayes: I1r.Horner, Pair. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Nr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill.
On motion of Mr.0,Neill,seconded by ylr. Apperson, it is resolved
that the sick leave be extended to Mrs. Helen Floyd to at least
November 15, 1973.
Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, I,ir. Apperson, Nir.Krepela and IVir.Ot1�eill.
-5--
On motion of iir. O'Neill,seconded by i°'ir. tpperson, it is resolved
that a Variance be granted to Mr.Craig D. Marks for the construction
of a dwelling on the Howlett Farms Subdivision, off Graves Road,
as shown on Tax Map 171-14.
Ayed: 11'r. Horner, r9r. Myers, I•ir. Apperson,Pir.Krepela and lair. CNeill.
On motion of .r.Myers, seconded by Nlir.Apperson, it is resolved that
a Variance be granted to Mr. and Nrs. George H.Comstock to construct
a dwelling on Parcel 1-Tax Map 13, provided a 50-ft. right of way
be recorded through said property and the County has no responsibility
in the construction or maintenance of said right-of-way.
It is here noted that an omnibus deed for this road has been
accepted.
Ayes: Nr.HornQ-.r, Vr. Myers, lair. Apperson and i`::r. O'Neill.
On motion of Mr. Horner, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved
that the County bgineer be requested to reply to the petition
for sewer service in the Iiarlborough Subdivision, citing the
survey of the Health Department.
Ayes: Mr. Horner, 1-Ir. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr.O'Neill.
On motion of Mr. Myers, seconded b�� P':r.OlNeill, it is resolved that
the proposal of the Ecol Science4, Inc. to write the environmental
impact statements on all sewer jobs for the amount of $31,248.00,
be and it hereby is accepted.
Ayes: Mr.Horner, 1`,ir. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. O'Neill.
On motion of Mr. Horner, seconded by _Mr.Apperson, it is resolved
that the sum of $525.00 be paid from the 3G: itoad Fund of the County
for pipe on Elkhardt Road at Wake :.venue.
;ryes: Mr. Horner, Mr. r`yers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. O'Neill.
On motion of Mr.Horner, seconded by Mr.Apperson, it is resolved that
since the contractor recently hired to do certain drainage work
in the Shenandoah Subdivision cannot obt:•_in bond,that the bond be
waived and the payment be made upon satisfactory completion of the
project.
Ayes: Mr. Horner, lilr. Myers, lair. Apperson and Mr.O'Neill.
On motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Mr.M�yers,.it is resolvedthat
William prosise be authorized to rent heavy equipment for the
drainage projedt on Gardner's Branch and Quail Oaks not to exceed
the cost of $2000.00.
Ayes: Mr.Horner, i.Ir. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr.O'Neill.
On motion of P-Ir. Apperson,seconded by Ivir.Myersi it is resolved that
a consulting firm be employed to conduct a drainage study on the
land owndd by the county, particularly at the site of the Vocational
High School.
Ayes: Mr.Horner, Nr. Myers, I-ir. Apper:= and i-ir.O'Neill.
-6-
.0
On motion of i-:r. Myers, seconded by Mr.Apperson, it is resolved
that this Board approves Change Order No. I -Contract 372-54CD-10,
involving the moving of one sewer manhole.
Aves: Nir. Horn(::r, Mr. Myers, 11,1r. Apperson and Mr. O'Neill.
Mr. Apperson states that Realty Industries need some additional
sewer connections at -the Courthouse Green project in order to
continue construction in this area.
It was pointed out by Mr. i,delchons and the County Administrator
that soon the addition to the Nursing Home, Vocational High School
and the Industrial complex of the Airport would need the available
sewer taps as well as other County facilities such as the Library
that may come in the near future.
Upon consideration whereof, Mr. Apperson makes the following motion:
Be it Resolved, that fifty (50) additional sewer connections be
guaranteed to the Courthouse Green project.
Ayes: Mr. Apperson
Nays: I�'ir. Iiorner, Mr. Myers and O'Neill.
Dr. Iviort Herwitz comes before the Board to discuss the proposed
mental Health building and Mental Health Program.
After much discussion of this matter, it was generally decided
that a further discussion would be held on November 28, 1973
with other departments of the County to ascertain the general
direction and scope of the Mental Health Program in the future.
Ayes: i,,ir.Horner, Mr. Myers, Nir. Apperson and Mr.OtNeill.
There was read a resolution from the School Board requesting
$25,000.00 due to increased enrollment and it was generally agreed
that the Board invite Dr. Kelly to meet with the Board on November 149
1973 to discuss overall increases in cost due to the expansion of
the school system.
On motion of Mr.Horner, seconded by Mr.N.yers, it is resolved that
the request of sir. Floyd Lipford for a Variance be deferred to
November 14, i�73.
Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers and Mr.O'Neill.
There was presented the annual report of the Richmond Metropolitan
Authority which report was filed with the papers of this Board.
There was read a le�ter concerning speed aoning on Rts.l and 36.
On motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by I,ir.O'Neill, it is resolved that
the omnibus deed for a 50-ft. right-of-way leading westwardly from
Rt.671 to the Powhatan line, be and it hereby is accepted.
Ayes: Nir. Horner, Mr. Myersand Mr. O'Neill.
- 7-
M
n
On motion of T'.r. Myers, seconded by i-ir.O'Neill, it is resolved that
Panola Road be taken into the State :secondary System of roads as a
Rural Road.
Ayes: Mr. Horner, iir. Myers and Mr.O'Neill.
On motion of fir. Myers, seconded by P_r.0'Ni:ill, it is resolved that
the following erroneous tax claims be and they hereby are approved
for paymeri t :
Joel A. Rackley
Rt. 4,Liox 30-A
F;oseley, Va.
Brenda N. Cole
12140 '�infree St.
Chester, Va,
William D. Noakes
2000 Castlebridge Rd.
Midlothian, Va.
Personal Property 1972 $15.00
Personal Property 1973 28.56
Personal Property 1973 13.87
Ayes: Mr. Horner, ilr. I0Iyers and Iir.O'Neill.
On motion o-A Mr.Myers, seconded by Mir.OtNeill, it is resolved that
the salary of Lonnie Oxendine be continued until such time as a
medical retirement can be effected.
Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, 'And "I-r. O'Neill.
On motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr. O'Neill, it is resolved that
Mr. C. G. i,%anuel and I%r. 2iomas Page be authorized to sign leases
for T-Hangars at the Chesterfield Airport.
Ayes: Nr.Horner, c-ir. Myers and Mr. O'Neill.
On motion of Mr.Myers, seconded by I'ir.OtNeill, it is resolved that
the Chairman and Clerk of this Board be and they hereby are
authorized to sign an agreement between the County of Chesterfield
and the State of Virginia for continued use of the Landfill at
Bon Air.
Ayes: Mr. Horner, 1\,Ir. Myers and Mr. O'Neill.
On motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by j-r.CtNeill, it is resolved that
the sum of $4396.75 be paid to COD.0 as the County' share of this
program.
Ayes: Dir. Horner, Mr. Myers and Mr.O'Neill.
On motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr.O'Neill, it is resolved that
the County accepts the deed of dedic,::tion from the Klingbeil
Holding Comppany for a right-of-way leading northwardly from Rt.60
at the Tanglewood Apartments.
Ayes: I1,:r.Horner, Mr. Myers and D�,r.OtNeill.
-8-
On motion of Mr. O'Neill,seconded by 1�1r.Myers, it is resolved that
the Judge of Circuit Court, the Honorable Ernewt P. Gates, be
requested to appoint Claude Lionel 1,ioore as a Patrolman for the
County of Chesterfield,
And be it further resolved, that the Chief of Police, Col. E.P.Gill,,
be authorized to employ Ralph Edward Bartley as a Dispatcher in the
Police Department.
Ayes: iVjr. Horner, i,r. Myers and Mr. O'Neill.
There was read a letter from the President of the Policemen's Pension
and Retirement Board requesting certain adjustments in the Police
Retirement system and it was generally agreed that this matter be
referred to 1.1r. James Condrey for analysis as to the cost to the
County for such a change in the coverage.
On motion of rr_. Myers, seconded by 14r.OlNe ill, Be it Resolved,
that the application of the P-Ad Cities Civic .association, Inc.,
for permission to conduct Bingo games and/or raffles, having been
received by the Board and duly considered, permission is hereby granted
said applicant , the Mid Cities Civic iissociation, Inc., to conduct
Bingo games and/or raffles subject to tho conditions as set forth
in said permit.
Ayes: Mr.Horner, Mr. 1`.yer. . and Nr. O'Neill.
On motion of Mr.Horner, seconded by `ir.Myer::,, Be it Resolved by
the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County tht the application
of the Ianchester--Richmond Lodge 699 Loyal Order of Noose for
permission to conduct Bingo games and/or raffles, having been
received by the Board and duly considered, permission is hereby
granted said applicant, the Manchester,- ichmond Lodge 699, Loyal
Order of Moose, to conduct Bingo games and/or raffles subject to the
conditions as set forth in said permit.
Ayes: fdr.Horner, 1 r. Myers and Nir.O'Neill.
On motion of 1,`r. Myers, seconded by I,.r.O'Neill, it is resolved that
the Sewer Department be re uestt::d to dive a time payment on a sewer
connection for Mrs. Bernice twillis, 1913 Arvin Drive.
Ayes: 111r. Horner, Mr. Myers and Mr_. O'Neill.
On motion of Iv1r.O'Neill,seconded by I'1r.Myers, it is resolved that
la'ir.Carl Wise and Mr. Michael Ritz, with the assistance of the Open
Spaces Commission, if necessary, suggest locations of from ten to
25 acres for one ball diamond, two tennis courts and other neighbor-
hood facilities in the general vicinity of Harrowgate Road, Ettrick
and Matoaca.
Ayes: IU1r.Horner, Mr. Iiyers and IZ. 011�eill.
On motion of Mr. Myers. seconded by Lr.O'Neill, it is resolved that
the Commonwealth's Attorney be requested to investigate Evelyn Drive,
leading from Cicero Drive and the possibility of forcing the developer
to improve said road.
Ayes: 1�ir. Horner, P-Tr. Myers, Mr.Apperson and Mir.O'Neill.
-9-
On motion of fir. F(yers, seconded by Vir.Apperson, it is resolved that
Carl Viise be requested to investigate the request of Johnny Bosher
for assistance in constructing a ball diamond in the Quail Oaks
Subdivision.
Ayes: Fir. Horner, 11VI.r. Nyers,7 Mr. Apperson and 1,1-r.OtNeill.
Mr. O'Neill presented a plan for extending Chalkley Road southwardly
to the area of the new landfill.
It was generally agreed that the feasibility of this roadway be
investigated.
There was presented a request to study the area of Rt. 10 and the
Ap;;>omattox River as a site for a future landfill.
On motion of 1,Iro Krepela, seconded by 1-r. Myers, it is resolved that
the County Enginee::r be authorized to charge sewer connections to the
Shopping Center at Rts. 147 and 60 when the building permits are
obtained. It is understood at this time ti)at the additional charges
connected with extending the sewer lines will also be paid.
Ayes: i,ir.Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, .lr.Krepela and D,S.r.O'Neill.
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County initiated
the original concept of Chippenham Parkway as a local facility to
serve local traffic, and
WHEREAS, the four -laving of Chippenham Parkway as presently planned
will cause the closing of Dalebrook Road;and
WHERUsaS, the closing of Dalebrook will add greatly to the traffic
problems of the area; and
WHEREAS, the closing of Dalebrook Road will place an inordinate
amount of traffic on Hopkins Road, which road is not constructed to
accommodate additional traffic; and
WHEREAS, this Board of Supervisors has previously requested the
Hiy hway Department to study the problems -attendant to the closing
of Dalebrook Road;
NOVA, THEREFCRL, BE IT KESOL'✓ED, eta motion of Mr. ppperson,seconded
by 11Ir.Niyers, that the Highway Department be requested to provide a
ramp on and a ramp off from the east and west bound lanes of Ch�,_ppenham
Parkway at Dalebrook Road to allow the traffic of this area to have
access to Chippenham Parkway.
It should be here noted that such an arrangement might reduce the
increase of traffic on Hopkins Road to an acceptable level.
Ayes: Mr.Horner, Two Myers, Mr. Apperson and mr.0'N`ill.
-10-
M
On motion of Mr. .,-,pperson.seconded by Mr.O'Neill, it is resolved
that this Board adjourns at 10:30 P.M. to November 8, 1973 at
7:00 P.M.
Ayes: Air. Horner, I-Ir. Myers, Nir. Apper .on and Nr.O'Neill.
-11-
%W lw�
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
October 3$ 1973
'ic'Dmond 1 it[jes -Dispatch
333 E. Grace'Areet
Richmond, 'Virginia
Gentlemen:
please have published in the Times-I)ispatch
only, the attached crdinance to ai-itend Chapter 6 0-11-
the (.---o(.;e of county of Chesterfieldq Virginia,
on cctober 10 zind 179 1973. case bill the ,-ounty
of "_he,terfield for this advertisement.
yVery truly yoursq
MIU B : w
Enclosure
M.U'.Burnett
Executive Secretary
09
M
TAKE NOTICE that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
bounty, Virginia, shall at its adjourned meeting on the 24th
day of October, 1973, at 2:00 P.M. consider the adoption of
the following Ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE to amend Chapter 6 of the Code of the
County of Chesterfield, Virginia, by adding thereto
a new Article,Article XI providing for disposition
of abandoned motor vehicles, and new sections,
Sections 6-228 through 6-234; Section 6-228 providing
for definitions of certain words; Section 6-229
providing for the County to take custody of abandoned
motor vehicles and emplo ppersonnel or contract for
such service; Section 6-L providing for giving of
notice to registered owner; Section 6-231 providing
for sale of abandonedyand disposition of proceeds;
Section 6-232 providing for taking vehicles abandoned
in garages; Section 6-233 providing for disposition
of inoperable abandoned vehicles and Section 6-234
providing for surrender of certificate of title when
vehicle to be demolished and records to be kept by
demolisher.
At a meeting of the Board of Supervisors to be held at the
Meeting Room of the Board at Chesterfield Courthouse,Virginia,
on the 24th day of October, 1973 at 2:00 P.M.
All persons favoring or opposing the adoption of this ordinance
are invited to attend this meeting.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
BY
ler
AN ORDINANCE to annend Chapter 6 of the Code of the County
of Chesterfield, Virginia, by adding thereto a new Article,
Article XI providing for disposition of abandoned motor vehicles,
and new sections, Sections 6-228 through 6-234; Section 6-228
providing for definitions of certain words; Section 6-229 pro-
viding for the County to take custody of abandoned motor vehicles
and employ personnel or contract for such service; Section 6-230
providing for giving of notice to registered owner; Section 6-231
providing for sale of abandoned vehicle and disposition of proceeds;
Section 6-232 providing for taking vehicles abandoned in garages;
Section 6-233 providing for disposition of inoperable abandoned
vehicles and Section 6-234 providing for surrender of certificate
of title when vehicle to be demolished and records to be kept by
demolisher.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA:
That Chapter 6 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield,
Virginia, be amended and reordained by adding thereto a new Article,
Article XI, and new Sections, Section 6-228 through 6-234, to
read as follows:
ARTICLE XI - Abandoned Motor Vehicles
Section 6-228 - Definitions
1. "CounLy" means County of Chesterfield
2. "Division" means Division of Motor Vehicles
3. "Abandoned motor vehicle" means a motor vehicle, trailer, or
semitrailer or part thereof that:
(a) Is inoperable and is left unattended on public property
for more than forty-eight hours, or
(b) Has remained illegally on public property for a period
of more than forty-eight hours, or
(c) Has remained on private property without the consent of
the owner or person in control of the property for more than
forty-eight hours.
4. "Demolisher" means any person, firm or corporation whose business
is to convert a motor vehicle, trailer or semitrailer into
processed scrap or scrap metal or otherwise to wreck, or
dismantle such vehicles.
Section 6-229 - County may take custody
The county may take custody of any abandoned motor vehicle
and employ its own personnel, equipment and facilities for such
M
F3
purpose or employ independent contractors for the purpose of
removing, preserving and storing abandoned motor vehicles.
Section 6-230 - Notice to be given owner
(a) When any motor vehicle is taken into custody the county
shall notify, within fifteen days thereof, by registered or
certified mail, return receipt requested, the owner of record of
the motor vehicle and all persons having security interests therein
of record, that the vehicle has been taken into custody. The
notice shall describe the year, make, model and serial number of
the abandoned motor vehicle, set forth the location of the
facility where the motor vehicle is being held, inform the
owner and any persons having security interests of their right
to reclaim the motor vehicle within three weeks after the date
of the notice, upon payment of all towing, preservation and
storage charges resulting from placing the vehicle in custody,
and state that the failure of the owner or persons having security
interests to exercise their right to reclaim the vehicle within
the time provided shall be deemed a waiver by the owner and all
persons having security interests, of all right, title and interest
in the vehicle, and consent to the sale of the abandoned motor
vehicle at a public auction.
(b) If records of the Division contain no address for the
owner or no address of any person shown by such records to have
a security interest, or if the identity and addresses of the owner
and all persons having security interests cannot be determined
with reasonable certainty, notice by publication once in a news-
paper of general circulation in the area where the motor vehicle
was abandoned shall be sufficient to meet all requirements of
notice pursuant to this chapter as to any person who cannot be
notified pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section.
Such notice by publication may contain multiple listings of
abandoned motor vehicles. Any such notice shall be within the time
requirements prescribed for notice by mail and shall have the same
contents required for a notice by mail.
(c) The consequences and the fact of failure to reclaim an
abandoned motor vehicle shall be as set forth in a notice given*in
accordance with and pursuant to this section.
Section 6-231 - Sale of vehicle; disposition of proceeds
If an abandoned motor vehicle has not been reclaimed as
provided for in Section 6-230, the County, or its authorized
agent, shall notwithstanding the provisions of Section 46.1-
88 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, sell the.abandoned
motor vehicle at public auction. The purchaser of the motor vehicle
shall take title to the motor vehicle free and clear of all liens
and claims of ownership of others, shall receive a sales receipt
at the auction and shall be entitled to, upon application therefor
pursuant to Section 46.1-68 of the Code of Virginia, as amended,
a certificate of title and registration card therefor. The sales
receipt at such a sale shall be sufficient title only for purposes
of transferring the vehicle to a demolisher for demolition,
wrecking or dismantling, and, in such case, no further titling of
the vehicle shall be necessary. From the proceeds of the sale of
an abandoned motor vehicle, the County, or its authorized agent, shall
reimburse itself for the expenses of the auction, the cost of
towing, preserving and storing the vehicle which resulted from placing
the abandoned motor vehicle in custody, and all notice and publi-
cation costs incurred pursuant to Section 6-230. Any remainder from
the proceeds of a sale shall be held for the owner of the abandoned
motor vehicle or any person having security interests therein,
as their interests may appear, for ninety days, and then shall be
deposited into the treasury of. the County wherein such abandoned
motor vehicle was abandoned.
Section 6-232 - Vehicles abandoned in garages
Any motor vehicle, trailer, semitrailer or part thereof left for
more than ten days in a garage operated for commercial purposes
after notice by registered or certified mail, return receipt
requested, to the owner to pick up the vehicle, or for more than
ten days after the period when, pursuant to contract, the vehicle
was to remain on the premises, shall be deemed an abandoned motor
vehicle, and may be reported by the garagekeeper to the County.
All abandoned motor vehicles left in garages may be taken into
custody by the County in accordance with Section 6-229 and shall
be subject to the notice and sale provisions contained in Sections
6-230 and 6-231; provided that if such vehicle is reclaimed in
accordance with Section 6-230, the person reclaiming such vehicle
shall, in addition to the other charges required to be paid, pay
the charges of the garagekeeper, if any; provided further, that if such
vehicle is sold pursuant to Section 6-231, the garagekeeper's
charges, if any, shall be paid from, and to the extent of, the
excess of the proceeds of sale after paying the expenses of the
auction, the costs of towing, preserving and storing such vehicle
which resulted from placing such vehicle in custody and all
notice and publication costs incurred pursuant to Section 6-230.
Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, nothing herein shall
be construed to limit or restrict any rights conferred upon any
person under Sections 43-52 through 43-36 of the Code of Virginia,
as amended. For the purposes of this section, "garagekeeper' means
any operator of a parking place, motor vehicle storage facility,
or establishment for the servicing, repair or maintenance of
motor vehicles.
Section 6-233 - Disposition of inoperable abandoned vehicles
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, or
the provisions of Section 46.1-88 of the Code of Virginia, as
amended, any motor vehicle, trailer, semitrailer or part thereof
which is inoperable and which, by virtue of its condition,
cannot be feasibly restored to operable condition, may be
disposed of to a demolisher, without the title and without the
notification procedures, by the person, firm, corporation, or
political subdivision on whose property or in whose possession
such motor vehicle, trailer, or semitrailer is found. The
demolisher, upon taking custody of such vehicle, trailer, or
semitrailer shall notify the Division of Motor Vehicles, on forms
and in the manner prescribed by the Commissioner and, notwith-
standing any other provision of law, no other report or notice
shall be required in such instance.
Section 6-234 - Surrender of title certificate; records required
y demolisheP
(a) Any demolisher who purchases or otherwise acquires a
motor vehicle for purposes of wrecking, dismantling or demolition
shall not be required to obtain a certificate of title for such
motor vehicle in his own name. After the motor vehicle has been
demolished, processed, or changed so that it physically is no
longer a motor vehicle, the demolisher shall surrender to the
Division for cancellation the certificate of title or sales receipt
therefor. The Division shall issue such forms, rules and regulations
governing the surrender of sales receipts and certificates of title
as are appropriate.
(b) A demolisher shall keep an accurate and complete record
of all motor vehicles purchased or received by him in the course
of his business. These records shall contain the name and address
of the person whom each such motor vehicle was purchased or
received and the date when such purchases or receipts occurred.
Such records shall be open for inspection by the Division at any
time during normal business hours.
RICHMOND NEWSPAPERS, INC.
Publisher o*40
THE RICHMOND TIMES -DISPATCH
3.0/17/73
Richmond, Va........... I .........................
Legal Notice
This is to certify that the attached ...............................................
was published in The Richmond Times -Dispatch, a newspaper
published in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia.
October 10, 17s 1973
.........................................................................................................
October 10, 1973
The first insertion being given..........................................................
Sworn toand subscribed before me 1 /1
TWOtt 24_W
........... P....u_...blic..
Notary
State of Virginia, City of Richmond:
My commission expires 2/ 2 5/ 7 7
COR� LL MARTIfl
-SUPERVISOR, ACCTS. RED
..................................................
TITLE
An Affiliate of Media General 333 East Grace Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 (804) 649-6000
05
M
Richmond
Newspapersjnc.
H. W. Richardson
Classified Advertising Manager
October 4, 1973
County of Chesterfield
Executive Secretary's Office
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
Attention: M. W. Burnett
Dear Mr. Burnett:
We acknowledge receipt of your letter of October 3 en-
closing a Meeting -Caning Events Notice for publication.
This notice will appear in the Times Dispatch on October
10 and 16, 1973.
*Your attention is directed to the terms of our acceptance
which are printed on this stationery. Please notify us of
any errors or omissions which you wish corrected.
Invoice and Certificate of Publication will be forwarded.
cerely,
Henry W. Richardson
HWR/ j a
•The Richmond Times -Dispatch and The Richmond News leader
are not responsible for typographical errors or errors in pub-
lication except to the extent of the cost of the first insertion. No
liability will arise through the omission for any cause of any ad or
legal notice. You are cautioned to check the papers to ascertain if
your ad or legal notice is published on the proper dates and in
the proper form.
ENG*ERING AND UTILITIES DEPARi�IENT
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OCTOBER 241 1973
I. Approval of water contracts:
W73-76D Settlers Landing, Section B $3,957.00
W73-75D Falling Creek Industrial Center, Phase 2 $3,779.60
* Ao*-&W73-77CD Otterdale, Section C $22,537.00
W73-73D Brighton Green, Section 13 $6,432.40
W73-70CD Beverly Acres, Section I $29,594.00
II. Consideration of letter dated October 15, 1973 from David C.
Belcher, III, concerning water and sewer connection at 6300 Mahone St.
III. Review petition dated September 7, 1973 for sewer service in
Marlboro Subdivision.
IV. Award of bid for Contract S73-43C, B eaverpond Branch trunk sewer,
to Stamie E. Lyttle Company, Inc. in the amount of $567,616.60
based on the use of a/c pipe.
V. (a) Review request for sewer service for Matoaca Middle., School,
South Chester Elementary School, Meadowdale Elementary School.
and Greenfield Elementary School.
(b) Review desirability of constructing interim pumping station
on Old Town Creek at Hickory Road.
VI. Authorization to accept a proposal from Ecco_1Scien_ces, Inc. for
environmental assessment of the County sewerage facilities.
VII. Consideration of letter dated October 16, 1973 requesting County
to obtain off -site easements for sewer and drainage facilities
and to pay for the off -site sewerage facilities in Surreywood,
Section E.
VIII. Resolution requesting the roads in the following subdivisions be
taken into the State System:
(a) Chestnut Hills, Sections B and C
(b) Lake Crystal Farms, Section G.
(c) Greenfield, Section H
(d) Bon Air Terrace Addition
"IX. Request authorization to receive bids for drainage project in
Greenfield Subdivision.
X. Miscellaneous road and drainage problems.
I (01 v "'. ' I
n
M
Agenda - Engineering and Utilities
Page 2
October 24, 1973
xi. Miscellaneous
1. Sewer charges for shopping center at Route 60 and
Route 147.
2. Resolution authorizing Engineering Department to
design Gatewood-Springhill.
3. Approve Change Order No. 1 for Contract S72-54CD10.
4. Authorize extension of pay for Helen Floyd.
5. Establish sewer connection fee for lots in existing
subdivisions where County installed sewer.
Robert A. Painter
County Engineer
October 24, 1973 (Revised)
14
COUNTY OF . CHESTEP.F IELD
(For InLracounty Correspondence)
TO: Mrs. Georgie Capps DATE.: October 9, 1973
FRO:i: Robert A. Painter
SUBJECT: Engineering ---Project S73-47C
. The Board of Supervisors authorized the County to do the
engineering on the Spring Hill--Gatewood Sewer Project S73-47C and -
to pay the County employees for time spent on this project. This
work will eventually be paid from bond funds, but until such time
as we have established a procedure for charging to the bond account,
charge these expenditures to 73-330-229.0, Sewer Improvement.,
Replacement and Exte nsion Fund, Engineering Services.
Please prepare checks
for the follotiring:
/o57.44
• a
A. J. Bridges
1 6 hours
3
� 7.04 =
Willis Pope
107
"
5.24
560.68
Bart Cameron
28
"
3.55 T
/',
99.40
Gerald Alley
20
"
4.32 -
✓�
86..40
Robert A. Painter
45
"
12.00
540.00
W. A. Prosise, Jr.
632
IT
7.04
447.04
David H. Welchons
62
"
8.95 =
:f
58.18
Leon Ruskell
12
"
4.75 =
✓
57.00
Total through
October
9,
1973
$2,806.14
RAP: id
Robert A. Painter
%� o a oI o �•-�'
n
In
MEMORANDUM
October 23, 1973
TO: Mr. M. W. Burnett, County Administrator
FROM: Mr. Michael C. Ritz, Director of Planning
SUBJECT: Variance for Craig D. Marks on Portion of Parcel 26,
Tax Map Sec. 171-14 (1)
In Matoaca Magisterial District Mr. & Mrs. Craig D. Marks,
Sr. request a variance to construct a dwelling on a parcel of
land with no public road frontage. The property contains one
acre and fronts on a dirt road that leads to Graves Road.
The Health Department has given approval for installation
of a septic tank and well with ample consideration for the home
site.
Access to the property is provided by an unimproved dirt
road that is approximately twelve feet in width. The road enters
Graves Road at a precarious angle. It has a telephone line on
poles passing from right to left sides at the very edge of the
road. At one point the road circles around both sides of a pole.
One new dwelling unit which is presently unoccupied fronts the
road.
Staff recommends that the applicant obtain at least a
25 foot easement for access from his property to Graves Road.
In the event that the dirt road that he understands is in the
process of becoming a rural addition never is accepted, the
easement would be his only legal means of access.
October 229 1973
Board of Supexvisors
Planning Office
Chesterfield Courthouse
Chesterfield, Va.
Dear Sirs:
We the undersigned would like to request a variance
under your building requirements in order to obtain a building
permit to construct our home located on our property# which fronts
two hundred ninety one feet (2911) on a dirt access roed. to Graves
Road. It is our understanding the said dirt road is now in process
of being taken into the county as a rural route road.
Your approval of this variance will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely#
Mr. & Mrs. Craig D. Marks# 5r.
TO
S w /j"9. i �.. is? :'� ,ti If `.
�� E ,� �- : � •.: : C' t i'•.;.
a.. —, �.,
.., �l w`r
r,
r
r--
/ r ` 1✓ /"
. u Lie ms a . ci;
/
$L11"S7UUY Naturally diafned, ;_. �l'� i�d eh: � Y= n ^.�
c C as:,;'lCion
.:._:�idC..,,. r„r; yam. •.: �_�. .-
': ". o elf- :f y..l .. ...� �.•' - :•, '- �V.- ..
4—/
j
T A I-S f� �Ti '-IN •'
(4)!nslde t7 n ns(oi L• �._ �(�`. �• _ +` .(� •:•<- _
)P /
Uef,il; of egyegatt {r -, bese of ', r. i.o t,sr o tchi
veblr .i GL Im!w:.
TUtal aggieq�fe minrw-i depth inch,..; :: r -:re �ep'h o. _�a,f e,d
f, o!n ,;rfar_e of of Q� o d.
Distance frc,.n weft to st;,tr,' to,- 'f- d,stince °r? ^ wel: r c :..r' d y
� f", .
Rough Sketch ut PrerTlf SI'. n_ �.,, _ ,., ..e r: _ .. •.-.,s't Je neni, <n ... ,r, �._.
... of L.c" .. -iu ,,. lie r• SDI C"�r•., vv.i rp- .. ...
Trees, end Other Pussiblt .OUfLeS 01 �.:',-cr„ -._ _ _ .".eier SucPlies. b. I d!�...mg= s•3r•. of S;opc v. .. ega c !o
1 _
�
it
r,i
\ _
roc^E C,•.n �. '. i
... -
c. •r-:.. . ;,. fie 6.I t, c, r
+ ., _S! v. C. , r _ra aLr r c c. .n-< ,_,...: �. en• ..;.r
.ie', r -, r..,.t.
c L.. : ti: r•. -h. ,.. <,� nf,,.- - th._ , .... r3 rr., .r. ..nU•_ �.. �1. , . ...
�V !-;L v il�-t
M E M O R A N D U M
October 18, 1973
TO: Mr. M. W. Burnett, County Administrator FROM: Mr. Michael C. Ritz, Director of Planning ot�
SUBJ4CT: Variance for Mr. and Mrs. George H. Comstock on
Part A of Parcel 1, Tax Map 13
In the Midlothian Magisterial District Mr. and Mrs.
George H. Comstock request a variance to construct a dwelling
on property having no public road frontage. The property has
recently been transferred to the Comstocks. It contains
approximately 17.5 acres.
The property has no public utilities available to it.
Mrs. Comstock has informed Staff that the Health Department has
inspected the site for well and septic tank and found it suitable.
Access to the property is provided by a twelve (12) foot
road which stretches from County Line Road into Powhatan County.
The road was widened, rough graded and graveled by the Virginia
Department of Highways with county funds this past spring.
Should the Board approve this variance Staff would recom-
mend that the Comstocks be required to dedicate no less than
twenty-five (25) feet from the centerline of the road on all
property they own that fronts on the road.
i 7
CENTFLkLTA LAGOON
M
October 23,1973
Total applied 304
Building permits 0
Obligated 251
Total committed 555
Connected 230
Design - 2000 people
500 connections @ 4 people per connection
555 connections @ 3.6 people per connection
666 connections @ 3 people per connection
Does not include Nursing Home Addition or the Airport
Average Flow (Sept.72-Aug.73) 702500 gpd
High month 84,500 gpd
Low month 47,800 gpd
Design Flow 2003000 gpd
Average Eff. BOD (Sept.73-Oct.73) 16 mg/l
Design 31 mg/l
Average Eff. Suspended Solids (Sept.73-Oct.73) 26 mg/1
Design 36 mg/1
ASHTON CREEK LAGOON
Total applied 735
Building permits 9
Obligated 402
Total committed 1146
Connected 730
Design - 4000 people
1000 connections @ 4 people per connection
1111 connections @ 3.6 people per connection
1333 connections @ 3 people per connection
Does not include South Chester Elementary School
Flow Data
Average Flow (Sept.72-Aug.73)
1792000
gpd
High month
230,000
gpd
Low month
901000
gpd
Design Flow
4001000
gpd
Average Eff. BOD (Sept.72-Aug.73)
24
mg/1
High month
40
mg/1
Low month
13
mg/1
Design
48
mg/l
Average Eff-Suspended Solids (Sept.72-Aug.73)
44
mg/1
High month
65
mg/1
Low month
25
mg/1
Design
48
mg/1
OLD TOWN CREEK LAGOON
Total applied 375
Building permits 3
Obligated 7
Total Committed 385
Connected 303
Design. - 1200 people
300 connections @ 4 people per connection
333 connections @ 3.6 people per connection
400 connections @ 3 people per connection
Does not include Matoaca Middle School
Flow Data
Average Flow (Sept.72-Aug.73) 125,700 gpd
High month 202)500 gpd
Low month 62,400 gpd
Design Flow 123,300 gpd
Average Eff. BOD (Sept.73-Oct.73) 1.8 mQ/1
Design 24 m-/1
Avera e Eff. Suspended Solids (Sept.73-Oct.73) 14 mg/,l
n
RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY
9 1 5 MUTUAL BUILDING • RICHMOND,VIRGINIA 2 3 2 19
TELEPHONE 649-8494 October 15, 1973
Honorable M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary
County of Chesterfield
Chesterfield, Virginia
Dear Mr. Burnett:
The Annual Report of the Richmond Metropolitan Authority
for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1973, is respectively sub-
mitted in accordance with 33-255:44:28(d) of Chapter 178 of the
Act of the Assembly, 1966, creating the Authority, a political
sub -division and public body corporate and politic of the
Commonwealth of Virginia.
Also enclosed is the fourth Progress Report submitted by
Howard, Needles, Tammen & Bergendoff, which is a more detailed
report on the construction of the first section of the express-
way system.
The Authority appreciates the support and cooperation from
both you and the Board of Supervisors during this past fiscal
year.
Sincerely,
RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY
Charles A. Taylor, Chzirman
m
m
RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY
ANNUAL REPORT
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1973
M
M
In this, its seventh Annual Report, the Richmond
Metropolitan Authority is ,pleased to set forth its
activities and accomplishments in the year ended June 30,
1973.
MANAGEMENT
The Authority is governed by a Board of Directors con-
sisting of six members appointed by the Council of the City
of Richmond (1), two members appointed by the Board of Super"
visors of Chesterfield County (2), two members appointed by
the Board of Supervisors of Henrico County (3), and one member
from the State Highway Commission appointed by the State High-
way Commission (4).
OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
CHARLES A. TAYLOR (1) Four years beginning July 1, 1972
Chairman and Director
PHIL J. BAGLEY, JR. (1) Four years beginning July 1, 1972
Vice Chairman and Director
A. J. BRENT
Secretary and General Counsel
* * * * * * * * * * *
ROGER L. TUTTLE (1) Four years beginning July 1, 1972
Director
REGINALD H. NELSON, IV (3)
Director
A. GRANT MOFFETT (2)
Director
J. B. WILLIAMS (1)
Director
JAMES L. JENKINS (3)
Director
LE ROY EAKIN, JR. (4)
Director
Four years beginning July 1, 1972
Four years beginning July 1, 1972
Four years beginning July 1, 1970
Four years expiring May 25, 1974
Four years expiring June 30, 1974
- 1 -
W,
FRANK G. LOUTHAN, JR. (1)
Director
RICHARD L. BLANTON (2)
Director
JAMES C. WHEAT, JR. (1)
Director
Four years beginning July 1, 1970
Unexpired term ending June 30, 1974
Four years beginning July 1, 1970
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
GEORGE W. CHEADLE General Manager
ALLEN G. McCABE, JR. Comptroller
Consulting Engineers Howard, Needles, Tammen & Bergendoff
Traffic Engineers Wilbur Smith and Associates
Bond Counsel Wood, Dawson, Love & Sabatine
Certified Public Accounts Arthur Young & Company
Trustee First & Merchants National Bank
Financial Advisors White -Weld & Company
-2-
I
RICHMOND EXPRESSWAY SYSTEM
THE PROJECT NOO
The Authority's Project now includes a proposed system of
limited access parkways and expressways approximately 10 miles
in length with an additional 3.3 miles of the system along the
Beltline designated as Interstate 195 to be built by the
Virginia Department of Highways.
The location of the ,proposed system was approved by the
Authority's Board of Directors on December 14, 1966. The
designation of a part of the Beltline Expressway and Downtown
Expressway as Interstate 195 was approved by the Federal Highway
Administration on July 18, 1969.
The various segments of the Project, as defined in the
Official Statement issued at the time of the financing of
Section I in January 1971 are identified as follows:
Operating Facilities:
Boulevard Bridge
Powhite Parkway and James River Bridge
Beltline connection to I-195
Under construction, Virginia Department of Highways:
Beltline Expressway (I-195)
Future construction:
Downtown Expressway
Possible future construction:
Riverside Parkway and Parham Road Extension
CONSTRUCTION
As reported in the 1972 Annual
Report, bids were awarded
bn April 1, 1971, for the construction
of Section I facilities,
with completion scheduled for January
substantially completed in
1973. Section I was
January
1973 and was open for traffic
on January 24.
Completed Contracts
Final
C-2 - Powhite Parkway
Amount
$7,950,612.
C-3 - James River Bridge
4,727,194.
C-4 - Beltline Connection to I-195
SL-1 - Signing, Striping, Highway
5,817,421.
Lighting
393,836.
-3-
too
Contracts TF-2 and TB-1 have been completed, but final
acceptance and ,payment had not been made at June 30.
In addition, Contract BB-2 for Painting and Repairing
of the Boulevard Bridge was let and has been completed at a
cost of $138,874.
FINANCING
On January 10, 1973, the Authority was prepared to sell
approximately $125,000,000. in Revenue Bonds at an interest
rate of 52% per annum. $70,000,000. of the issue was for
financing Section II (the Downtown Expressway) and $55,000,000.
was for refunding the 7% Bonds, Series of 1971. The 52% per
annum interest rate had been confirmed in the contract, which
the underwriters presented to the Authority on January 10.
However, on January 9, the James River and Kanawha Canal Parks,
Inc., Eugene B. Sydnor, Jr., President, entered suit in the
Federal District Court, seeking to block construction of the
Downtown Expressway. The litigation will be discussed in
another section of this report.
The suit did not block the sale of bonds for refunding
the 7% Bonds, Series of 1971, and the Authority immediately
began to work on preparation of a new refunding issue. Bonds
dated January 15, 1973, in the amount of $52,220,000., at an
annual interest rate of 5.40% were sold on February 15, 1973.
The proceeds of the 1973 Refunding Bonds were used to purchase
Federal National Mortgage Association obligations maturing
January 15, 1981, to be held by the Trustee, to be used on
that date to call the 7% Revenue Bonds, Series of 1971. At
that time, the 1973.Refunding Bonds will become "The Bonds"
and be payable as to principal and interest from revenues of
the Authority.
The Authority immediately began to develop plans for the
financing of the Downtown Expressway (Section II), pending
settlement of the suit, and had tentatively set July 15, 1973
as an offering date. However, on the 59th of the 60 days
allowed to the James River and Kanawha Canal Parks, Inc., to
appeal the decision of the Federal District Court, they filed
an appeal with the United States District Court of Appeals,
thus blocking the possibility of the July sale. The Authority
maintains constant communications with its financial advisors,
so that, pending settlement of the suit, work can begin
immediately towards the sale of the bonds for completion of
the Project.
we
L �00 *0
LITIGATION
On January 9, 1973 James River and Kanawha Canal Parks, Inc.
filed a suit in the U. S. District Court for the Eastern District
of Virginia against the Authority and officials of the City, the
State Highway Commission and the U. S. Department of Transportation.
The complaint sought, among other things, a permanent injunction
against further allocation and expenditure of funds for, or con-
struction of, the Downtown Expressway and the Downtown Expressway
Extension and against the issuance by the Authority of any bonds
connected with the construction of the Downtown Expressway until,
among other matters, an environmental impact study was filed and
considered.
On May 8, 1973 the U. S. District Court ruled in favor of
the Authority and the other defendants and dismissed the suit.
On July 6, 1973 the James River and Kanawha Canal Parks, Inc.
appealed to the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
At the request of the defendants the Court of Appeals expedited
the matter, heard arguments on August 14, 1973, and on August 17,
1973 affirmed the dismissal of the suit by the District Court.
The Court of Appeals also _provided that if the James River and
Kanawha Canal Parks, Inc. petitioned the Supreme Court of the
United States for a writ of certiorari more than thirty days
after August 17. 1973. it wOu1 d hA rormi rari +-rN r,; y,0 1�--A 4--k
corporate surety in the sum of $500,000.
James River and Kanawha Canal Parks, Inc. at a news confer-
ence held on September 11, 1973 announced through its President
that it would not appeal. The period during which such corporation
may appeal, however, will not expire until November 15, 1973.
while this action took place after the
year, it is of such importance that we felt
in the report for the year ending June 30,
-5-
close of the fiscal
it should be included
1973.
0
OPERATIONS
The Powhite Parkway, James River Bridge and Beltline
Connection to I-195 (Section I), opened to traffic on
January 24, 1973.
Simultaneously, the toll equipment on the Boulevard Bridge
was modified to operate under the new toll schedule of 104� for
regular vehicles and 2041, for vehicles pulling trailers.
Generally, we were quite pleased with the operations from
the very beginning. We, of course, incurred the usual shake-
down problems in equipment and minor interferences from con-
struction equipment involved in clean-up, final grading and
seeding, installation of fences and other such work.
Mr. J. S. Spitzer, Supervisor of Toll Collections on the
two facilities, had done an excellent job in the training of
the new men, in the short time available to him, and we have
been quite pleased with the work of our toll collectors.
One of the immediate benefits from the opening of the new
facilities was the decline in back-up on the approaches to the
Boulevard Bridge in the morning and afternoon rush hours. As
will be seen from the Traffic and Revenue Tables enclosed in
this report, average daily traffic on the bridge dropped from almost
24,000 per day to about 18,500 in February, the first full month
after Section I opened. By May, this had come back to slightly
more than 20,000 vehicles per day, dropping to 18,800 in June,
which is normal with the end of the school year.
Traffic on the Powhite Parkway has been steadily increasing,
averaging almost 8,300 vehicles per day in June. Public reception
to the new facility has been excellent and since the opening of
the road, a very large new shopping center has opened only a few
miles from the Chippenham Parkway terminus of the Powhite Parkway,
also, a new hospital has opened at Jahnke Road and Chippenham
Parkway, just a very short distance from this same terminus. Both
of these facilities are proving to be quite beneficial to the
Authority. We are confident that toll revenues will exceed those
forecast for the first year of operation.
Tables showing traffic and revenues for both facilities
follow this section.
cm
M
M
To to 1
Daily Average
Total
Daily Average
BOULEVARD BRIDGE TRAFFIC
Vehicles by Class
Year Ended June 30, 1973
2 axle - 10� (Eff. 1/24/73)
3 or more axles - 204 (Eff. 1/24/73)
Passes
Special Permits
City & Emergency
Other
POWHITE PARKWAY TRAFFIC
Vehicles by Class
Period Ended June 30, 1973
(opened January 24, 1973)
Year
Ended
June 30
5,887,296
1,249
1,738,990
57,421
162,696
104,390
7 , 952 , 042
21,786
Period Ended
2 axles
20�
June 30
1,067,326
3 axles
30�
3,277
277
4 axles
40�
599
5 or more axles
50o,4
508
Non -Revenue
69,508
262
Other
1,388
1,142,360
7,230
N
h
0%
r-I
M O
9 a
H-
fir►+`
N *400
.
4 W d' m m M 0 lO N t0 m M O 1- lO
W r4 O h dr O M M N N r-1 M h 0 h
(d r-1 d' M lO h M O M ill h N M M M
U H h 0 dr d' t lO 1 M rh h -:t M
N N N N N N N N N N N N O
, M
U N
0) 0illOd'mmr-I MmOd000MlO
m >4 r-I M r♦ h N M h ill M O O N r-I M
:I r-1 U N N m O to mN Lfl O 0 00 00 d>
> -(I) ,� It It M dr M M N M It d' d' N M
(.a N N N N N N N N N N N N N
II
CO d' O m 40 l0 O �O rl rl M N N
U) O N dr h d1 O to M 0 d' L1l 01 N
a) M lfl N h Ol r-I d) lO h N �0 M L(1
r
U ri O Cl d' 00 c Ol N OO rh Ol d' O
-r4 ill ill rl d' O dr CO 00 lO d' tO 00 lO
h lO lO h h h lO h
a)
00
-
10 r1 . . . . . . .
W r4M 0lO rl r-I N O M O Op
fd O L(l O Op M OO l0 Lf1 01 M � h d1 N
U E 1 0 0 M M rl Ol
h h L(1 lO tO h h h N M ill ill N
NNNNNNNMd'dr�irdrO
d'
vl-
m >1 a) h M 0 to r-I N O m dr h l0 N lO
0 r4 r4 I- Ill O O O d' N wt LC) O -4 Co O
f-( •r1 U h LC) O O h h M d' r 4 M rl h h
w Ol Cl O 00 rl
) N N N N N N CN r-4 r4 rl N -4 N 11
M N r-I d' N N lO 01 r4 r••I Ln lO M N
maoMdroMmNlO hOwmd'
r-I O r♦ r4 M O 01 M 0 h N Lfl d' O
U
-A h r••I O M rl Lfl CO l0 M h M M N
M lO N dt r-I M d' r-I m O1 N l0 LCl
a) h h h h h h l0 Lr) Ln Ln 0 Ln 0)
1-11
b � v
rt a) A s`I 0) 0) >1 p
r-I-r4
b >i 0 4-) O N 9 0$4 U� a)
:J P r•i UI CL. 4-)D U 9 .A P P ?i 9
O oa a) U O a) (d a) (d a M 0
w m0zQhwz4zh
O
r-I
?�
U
(d
-ri
44
W
(d
�•I
a
4-)
4-1
4J
LC1 � O r•I d] l0
M
•ri
%t O O N rl N
r-I
dr N N LO r4 M
00 N 00 O Lr h
N
ai
a)
M M Itt d' d'
r-I
(2,
N
O
O
m
M
�
N •
•rl
lO
0
a) N
a)
o
h
O Ln h r-1 lO 00
O
0
h
O O O M O N
N
O
z
lO lO lO h h 00
h
O
r4
N
O
ra
4-i
O
O r-I
iY
r-I -A
4a
O M M dr 00 Ill
O
r.
O r-i Ln 0) ON Ol
kD
O m O M Olt
M
O
41
p
b
CO 0) CO 0) M 00
N
44
a) a)
d' 10 r-I r-I d' It
d'
0 V
r-I N N N N
r-I
b
b U
r--I
U1
ro r-I
1 i
(If
a) ri
d'
a)
(a O
N
i-1
O U
U
r1
>~
0
U N
a)
r4
rl
LL
0) r-I
o
m
rno
v
r-I
b a-)
V A33
4 M
H
•ri r�
rd 0 r4
a h w z< z h
*00
OTHER ACTIVITIES
I
EXPRESS BUS SERVICE
We reported, last year, that the Authority had received a
formal request from the City of Richmond and the Counties of
Chesterfield and Henrico, to operate, in conjunction with the
Virginia Transit Company and the Virginia Department of Highways,
an Express Bus Service, connecting western Henrico County and
the Downtown area of the City of Richmond.
The busses will operate between Parham and Fordson Roads,
in Henrico, along Interstate 64 and 95 and Downtown Richmond.
The Highway Department completed preparation of the lot at
the end of June. During the spring, contracts were finalized
between the Authority and the City of Richmond, the County of
Henrico and the Virginia Transit Company for the operation of
this experimental service. Payments were made to the Authority
by both the City and Henrico County in the amounts of $9,500
each to establish the necessary working fund. The Virginia
Transit Company completed the painting of three busses, in
distinctive coloring and marking, to indicate that they were
the Richmond Metropolitan Authority Parham Express. Service
was scheduled to begin and, in fact, did start on July 2.
PARKING GARAGE
An Ad Hoc Parking Committee, appointed by the City of
Richmond, employed consultants to make a study for the purpose
of determining the development potentials of the Fleming -Griffin
Parking Lot, located at Second, Grace and Franklin Streets. The
report included sections on economic development potentials,
parking demand, evaluation of development alternatives and a
development program. The recommendation was that a three or four
level garage with a minimum of 316 parking spaces be constructed.
In order that the project would be feasible, it was suggested
that the City would make the land available at no cost. Cost
of the garage, depending upon the number of spaces made available,
was estimated to run between $800,000. and $1,000,000.
The Authority has been requested to have its engineers and
architects prepare suggested design plans and to come up with
more definitive estimates of cost, revenues and feasibility.
Assuming that the project will be feasible, the Authority has
further been requested to proceed with the financing, construction
and operation of the facility. It is estimated that if the pro-
ject is feasible, it can be in operation within approximately one
year.
-7-
t
POWHITE PARKWAY EXTENSION
The County of Chesterfield has appropriated funds and
requested the Authority to have preliminary feasibility studies
made to consider the extension of Powhite Parkway into the
County, along a line suggested by the County.
There are two alternates to this study. One, for a route
extending from the present Powhite Parkway to Route 60, and the
second for a further extension, approximately to Route 360.
The preliminary feasibility reports are due from the con-
sultants during the fall of 1973. The information furnished in
this report will determine whether or not definitive cost and
revenue estimates will be made.
-8-
m
In
EXCERPTS
FROM
HOWARD, NEEDLES, TAMMEN & BERGENDOFF
PROGRESS REPORT #4
PERIOD ENDING JANUARY 1, 1973
TABLE 3
ESTIMATES OF COSTS
RICHMOND EXPRESSWAY SYSTEM
SECTION ONE CONSTRUCTION
REPORT CURRENT
ESTIMATE ESTIMATE
Construction Items
(Contracts C-2, C-3 & C-4 and all
Miscellaneous Items such as Toll
Facilities, Signing, Lighting, etc.)
Right -of -Way for Section One
(Including Acquisition Expenses)
Boulevard Bridge Painting $ Repairs
Other Section One Items
Engineering
Administration, Consultants, Legal
and Other Costs
Contingencies
TOTAL
EXPENDED
TO DATE
$18,200,000 $20,400,000 $18,428,000
2,000,000
1,200,000
1,030,000
50,000
50,000
0
1,900,000
1,900,000
1,768,000
450,000
475,000
462,000
1,500,000
25,000
0
$24,100,000
$24,100,000
$21,688,000
m
1 9 7 1
1
9
7 2
9
9
7 3
JFMAMJJASONOJfMAM1I111
JJRSONU
JfMAMJJASONU
SCHIDULED
ACTUAL
SECTION ONE
CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS SCHEDULE
�r
�r
�RICHMOND EXPRESSWAY SYSTEM
figure 1
3
1
•� •O
-�
+L+ in
o. ro
4
4j (M 4-1 O
C L
V > aCL
1.
�
�
�.°
�
¢
rnE•� N
W
.— cN M
•3
3
3 u c 4J
_c o. (n
3 a >..-
m -T L
e#
�
4J
i
1
t7)
U
C L N N L C
Y O O 'C m
•—
x=
<�
L L•
3
O L n.w
N
tC)�
> O M � (n
T
EXHIBIT 1
m
I
EXHIBIT 4
0
m
m
0
4 k 4♦
k f• � h�
{.
s
} t
t
t
�e
b
�v
5
� y
�a
c N
wooer
c +..t a •-
u L. X
4J c > O
ago°m
as U 'O O
O u1 O
� ( wW0
M W to
O N 'v m
t N �-
M 4J fp C1
.0 N m O
0
L. L. O ,
3 c .mac
rn4JtN rn
c 4J .�
0 3 0 i- t
O N +> > y.J
N m +j
3 i E 3 4O
N Q. O L.
X L 4-i N
W 4- tn •—
EXHIBIT 6
RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1973
with
REPORT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
M
CONTENTS
Report of certified public accountants
Financial statements
Balance sheet
Statement of changes in fund balances
Statement of revenues and operating expenses
Notes to financial statements
Supplementary information
Statement of cash receipts and disbursements
Investments held by Trustee
M
Schedule
1
2
M
ARTHUR YOUNG & COMPANY
The Board of Directors
Richmond Metropolitan Authority
801 E. MAIN STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 3-S
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23206
We have examined the accompanying balance sheet of Richmond
Metropolitan Authority at June 30, 1973 and the related statements
of revenues and operating expenses and changes in fund balances for
the year then ended. Our examination was made in accordance with
generally accepted auditing standards and accordingly included such
tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures
as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
In our opinion, the statements mentioned above present fairly
the financial position of Richmond Metropolitan Authority at June
30, 1973 and its revenues and operating expenses and the changes
in its fund balances for the year then ended, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles applied on a basis con-
sistent with that of the preceding year.
In making our examination we obtained no knowledge that the
Authority failed to comply with any of the terms, covenants or con-
ditions contained in the Trust Agreement. However, it should be
understood that our examination was not directed primarily toward
obtaining such knowledge.
Our examination has been made primarily for the
purpose
of ex-
pressing an opinion on the financial statements, taken asawhole.
The'accompanying supplementary information, although not considered
necessary for a fair presentation of financial position or results
of operations, is presented for supplementary analysis
It has been subjected to the tests and other auditin purposes.
rocedures
applied in the examination of the financial statementspmentioned
above and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all respects material
in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.
August 3, 1973
%r
N
m M I A I 1
�a 0
papmq
i�
♦+ I O t 1
N
m O to
a Iv1
! N
�
v
wa
1 I� 1
n
V M
7a7
0 z fY.
a
N
1.4
0
'C q
V�
O
ipO
o
N
�
►
CD I
1
ID a
W �I P7 N
OC
N
A
o U
ad
1 1
0
O
O
0
>» 03 al
10
�j
M
a a0
N
N
v
w I2OOm "1 m
."1 N NdpH N N
t0 O1 V' d' CD m O
A w MM M N
enj in
in Ntl
► 1 1 1 1 I II All
n
M
N
CD 1 1 1
1 I 1
m
O
M
�N
O
V'
N
A l
l l 1 1
47
� �
m
M M
ago
N
p
N
1 I I I I 1 11 ri
O1
O1
m
rl
M
1 illl
1
II..II
1 10 1 0 1
I
1
o m
ro
M
1 I I 1 1
1
1 1
I
� N COD V1
0)
l+9 N
N
.O N
O
m
• 1
I
f-40
O r'1
O
V�
�O
N
I l l l 1 II
n
nll
km
N
N
��� 00 11 1 � I I I I ►�
as oo a u1 M w
O 1ai ! m, N p
]1
1pa+p
O
ab a
a p�
O
F+ 9 •. d F. d 4r U to U w g M
,r O C 0.0
d 4) F. In 'O a 0
A m 1 a++F. C)q•14x OUN
Do A U 01 I d O d 41 C d F. a M a+
m D1 d m z N 1-1 ++ a A "4 + a O
++ 4-+ ; - a A O X 3 d C) z
i' .110 d++ a++ M d a)a O41"
O C1 U W al �p ++ > 8 Iw 0 8 d
444..
U4J V?UE a0 N FO.4 >�'UO pw
1g0�0-A M CN aUW d(C1 CEN
gym{dWd`uykd>dfiuS.. 4) Cal7 OQ.0 IaJU
G1 c) a c) H C a p. m
.�
O�
M
O O
m
M
n
MM
e�r1
n
o N
to
o
N
N
N
M
m
i-1
rl N
M
N
r
I I I I I I I I I AI A
o n
N
I MI
MII
1 1
1 1
I
I
I
l m
m
1 m
1 1
►
►
o
ti m
C4
C
a
N
la m
N
1 1
1 1
1
1
I
l r-I
.-1
all
N N
�
N
1, 1
I I
I
1
III II
pII
> m
I d.
►
1
1
N .y.
!
N
N
p
1 m
O 1
1
1
1
2
►
O
a
COD
m
N
^m
0)
00
mFD
m
0
n
COD
.Ni
Go
oo
O
CAD
m
O
enID
CD
.M►
V.
M
.Or
O
r-1
N
r-1
r-i
A
�
N
1
1 1
►
1
1
1,4
.a
�
OMi
O
O
IA
U9
N
1
1 1
1
I
I I t0
t0
A
n
Ian
vi
N
NN
1
1 1
1
1
1 1 t0
tD
Of
W
N
N
N
1 n
U a a
a a O m
a to a 90 ad) ,Or 0i
Uw *u+ 41 V d 0 �
d� , 4 0 Doi a d o (a 0)
,moo
rA d A M 6) w 8 4) - to
k O O U 6) G1 .i
a) C) V $4 .r .-) N m
F. W d a ++ >, C N 0) A A U
•N V U >. U1 >..n d d
Do ++a >, d d C) F. a d ado d
.o OF.d zodoazaz a
U U add -w.+ U a" ate- pas
Cu
O I= Im too W
RadO'
1
1
1 tff
10
00 I
CD
h
atf V
aD
a00
0O0
co
M
'
V N♦+
mq
a m O
1
1
O V
N.r
Ib N
.0
M
O
1 1
1
M
O
+1
@A
1
1
1 1
1
NN
M
M
[�
Otnp
m
N
o
h
Uhf
�O
N
13
R1 �
N
r1
.�
r•r
.y
qq
O
C
1
ep
t°O^ M
N
.r
I O
O
O
.0-
N
,133
p P4I
i�
ko N
14 N
h
N
'tl�
to
H
1hl
M
M
a
ll
[per
1[•S�'r+
000
U
Of
rJ
c7
�rq
Fi OW
O z
1
1
1 I
1
O O
coo
CA►+ O
Ip
O
co
T
W
O
00
m
t0!0
.7
O
¢ M
O
q
N
q
a
m
t�•i ti
pN7 m
C7 Q
+�
.� 0 4I
4 0N
C
N
CO
y
I
I O
O
1`
N
a�0
v
1 1
1
N
ao
°;
V
PM m
O A
[prq �
04
m F>i C7
N 0 7
pk7 A A
C.
I.
�
N
h O
•Nd� O
~ V
pMf
u0'f
M
OMf
Lo
q1
�
q
Op'O)
00
O
I
1
h
h
11
I
tp
h
ydM14
RSV
N
�
�
N
'C1
qma
fr 0
C U
1
1
1D O
1.4
OOo
r1 N
N
tp
M
N
I I
1
tp
M
N
DI
��Npp
'O
q
M
~
H
~
>
4) 7
Ql N
00
01 O
0 m A
d
q F
.I d
q M
O
0
A p tD 0
0
++ r
+1 d
q
d d
q
x
0
►qa >00
yeao
ti
OFOo��i
Od+°+
N
m +1 q
>
O G)
U ++
•• C1
U
04J k
q •• p O +� F)
O F
0 1.
r-1 q
W
c 4)
O
�
rdl R1 •.A1 N Adi
N 1. W
.d1
d O $4 N N N
.0 W CI N
O Cd
Av4
0
F A
eq41 d
k V
U V O C.
F
RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY
STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND OPERATING EXPENSES
For the year ended June 30 1973
REVENUE FUND
Revenues:
Tolls
Tags
Other
Operating expenses:
Operations:
Salaries and employee benefits
Maintenance
Equipment rental
Other
Administrative:
Administrative fees--RMA
Insurance
Other
Total operating expenses
$ 615,034
50,145
2,400 $ 667,579
$ 142,505
7,942
39,410
26,826 216,683
32,000
10,172
3,455 451627
Other income:
Interest
Excess of revenues over operating expenses
NOTE:
During the year the Bridge Revenue Fund
was merged into the Expressway Revenue Fund.
This statement represents the combined results
Of operations of both funds for the current
year.
See accompanying notes.
262,310
1,055
$ 406,324
RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 1973
1. Accou
nting policies
The accounts of the Authority are maintained on an accrual
basis of accounting. Investments are stated at cost adjusted
for amortization of discount or premium over the time remaining
to maturity. Cost of equipment is charged to construction
costs at the time of purchase. No depreciation is recognized
on the assets of the Authority.
2. Organization
The Authority was created in 1966 by Act of the Assembly
of the Commonwealth of Virginia. It is governed by a Board of
Directors consisting of eleven members, six of whom are ap-
pointed by the Mayor of the City of Richmond, with the approval
of the City Council, two each by the Boards of Supervisors of
Henrico and Chesterfield Counties, and one ex-officio member
appointed by the State Highway Commissioner. The organization-
al meeting of its first Board of Directors was held on July
15, 1966.
The Authority is responsible for construction of a toll
expressway system to serve the Richmond metropolitan area.
Expenditures made by the Authority for the expressway prior to
placing it in service will be capitalized as cost of the
project.
3. Accumulated construction costs
Accumulated construction costs, net of interest earned,
sales of property and other credits, at June 30, 1973 follow;
Amount
Rights -of -way, etc. $16,108,781
Engineering 6,566,276
Construction contracts 19,5091321
General and administrative, etc. 11,195,860
$53,380,238
4. Due to City of Richmond
Construction Fund - The Authority is obligated to repay
the City of Richmond $2,050,000 without interest, from proceeds
of future issuance of another series of bonds. This represents
RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30,
1973
(Continued)
$216,383 ofpreliminary
engineering studies, etc. and d$1,z833,617res eadvancedby the Ctoythersurvey,
ity by the City. Author-
The Authority has issued $81,150 in subordinate notes to
the City of Richmond in
compliance with terms of a contract
adopted May 11, 1970. The Authority shall issue
subordinate
notes equal to the value of all easements, permits, licenses or
other interests
in land conveyed by the City to the Authority
for use by the Authority as
part of the project. The notes bear
interest at the rate of 4.53 %
per annum and are payable January
15, 2021. The contract provides for the
prepayment of the notes
subject to certain requirements, prior to maturity.
Subordinate Note Fund - During the year the Authority issued
$41604,000 in subordinate notes to the City of Richmond in com-
pliance with terms of a contract adopted May 11, 1970, requiring
the City to deposit with the trustee an amount equal to the
maximum annual debt service on the currently outstanding 1971
Bonds. The Authority is required to issue subordinate notes at
such times and in such amounts as the City makes in payments to
the Expressway Bond Reserve Fund. The notes bear interest at
the rate of 4.57% per annum and are payable January 19, 2023.
The contract provides for the prepayment of the notes, subject
to certain requirements, prior to maturity.
5. Bonds payable
Revenue bonds in a principal
issued under the terms of a true
1970. These Bonds bear interest
and mature January 15, 2013. Th
the redemption of the Bonds by us
in principal amounts ranging from
in 2013. The Authority also has
at any time commencing in January
104% in 1981 to 100% in 2006 and
amount of $51,300,000 were
t agreement dated December 30,
at the rate of 7% per annum
e trust agreement provides for
e of sinking fund installments,
m $40,000 in 1987 to $4,095,000
the option to redeem the Bonds
1981 at prices ranging from
thereafter.
Expressway revenue refunding bonds in a principal amount
of $52,220,000 were issued under the terms of a trust agreement
dated February 15, 1973. These Bonds bear interest at the rate
of 5.4% per annum and mature January 15, 2013. The trust agree-
ment provides for the redemption of the Bonds by use of sinking
L
RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 1973
(Continued)
fund installments, in principal amounts ranging from $100,000
in 1982 to $3,495,000 in 2013. The Authority also has the
Option to redeem the Bonds at any time commencing in January
1983 at prices ranging from 1021% in 1983 to 100% in 1996 and
thereafter. The Bonds were issued in order to retire the 1971
Series Bonds on January 15, 1981 which will be the first call
date of the 1971 Bonds.
6. Assets held by trustee
Construction Fund - Under the terms of a trust agreement
certain of the procee s of the 1971 Series Bonds (see Note 5)
were deposited with the trustee to be held until requested by
the Authority for payment of expressway construction costs.
The proceeds held by the trustee at June 30, 1973 amounted to
$1,914,864 consisting of $1,796,710 in investments and $118,154
on deposit in a savings account.
In,
m
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
n
0
N
m
M 1 1 1 1 j
N
1 1 00 1 1
" N
N t0
a
COV 'vM 1 1
h H O
N v N
O M 4WD
N
h
al,
W
.Or
N 1 100 1 1
n ti m
fa
CO O
N
Onf' 'O' pOp
00 O O
en
N M N N
1 1 1 00 1 I
O
tO0
I V L I 00
N
N N O Cf
OD
vn N~ ccn
O N
00
o n
.r v
1 1 1 1 1 1 C
O
h
N N
C
+Oc
O M
�
All C
m, a1
0 v
ti 0 A w
+m+ v0
+
A■ w
Uv 00
1-4 .. to
N WIN O N
I m w
n
z O C C
A
+mN+
F
Os
!
O.�I > 7 ++ +1
AO.0
rCI +1
wIII
Acd.00 ta
�r1UU
0C1U70
O
+1U
zC349od 'O
~ 'C101�000 i.
Q'p'
M
Z C C
rt O A O A 1M W w
O ~
0)
01 ti OO c0
0 aal O m
a+ +y ++
A1+49:
G
0
IU +1 01 it ++t
OIA�+I .cm
17 I. +1 ..t v 'O Ic
Or0m+•dfOrm
04 C U 0) is
yd
h
.t 'O
m 01 c0)4,>+>W
is
m9
++W
.iVOi
O-TO pU
A -t
+ti0N +
01 0 >.
A Sri eti1 .4 M 'O U U cd �+
01EO•-010:0: �G
7 41 q > co �C
0
Cd
m r N 14 +1 +1
0.c°)fNaDa0.
Qoc°J"[�io
m
0
m
m
Schedule 2
11
RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY
INVESTMENTS HELD BY TRUSTEE
June 30, 1973
Description
Construction fund:
Certificate of deposit --
United Virginia Bank/
State Planters
U. S. Treasury bills
Bond fund interest account:
Certificate of deposit --
First and Merchants
National Bank
U. S. Treasury bills
Reserve fund:
Certificate of deposit --
First and Merchants
National Bank
Certificate of deposit --
First and Merchants
National Bank
Certificate of deposit --
Bank of Virginia
Certificate of deposit --
Bank of Virginia
Face Interest
Amount Maturity Rate
$ 300,000 7-16-73 7.83%
1,500,000 7-12-73 6.55%
12800,000
$ 39881 7-12-73 5.%
240 000 7-12-73 6.55%
�-243 ,
$ 110,000 7-10-73 6.28%
200,000 7-10-73 5.5%
12795,500 7-10-73 6.17%
2,812,000 7-10-73 6.54%
4,9 7,500
Cost
Basis
$ 300,000
12496,709
,796,709
$ 3,881
239,518
$ 110,000
200,000
1,795,500
2,812,000
$ 4917 50b
Proceeds fund:
Federal National Mortgage
Association bond $5,667,229 1-15-81 5.4748% $ 5,667,229
Federal National Mortgage
Association bond 53,352,000 1-15-81 3.5747% 45,6411 177
59,019,229 $51,3iti06
Refunding bond fund interest
account:
U. S. Treasury bills $ 465,000 7-12-73 6.55% $ 464,089
DOUGLAS B. FUGATE, COMMISSIONER
MORRILL M. CROWE, RICHMOND, VA.
LE ROY EAKIN, JR., McLEAN, VA.
EARL A. FITZPATRICK, ROANOKE, VA.
THOMAS R. GLASS, LYNCHBURG, VA.
LEONARD R. HALL, BRISTOL, VA.
DOUGLAS G. JANNEY, FREDERICKSBURG, VA.
ROBERTS. LANDES, STAUNTON, VA.
WILLIAM T. ROOS, YORKTOWN, VA.
L. R. TREAT, JR.
DISTRICT ENGINEER
Board of Supervisors
County of Chesterfield
Chesterfield, Virginia
Gentlemen:
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
1221 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND, VA. 23219
23832
October 17, 1973
JOHN E. HARWOOD,
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER
W. S. G. BRITTON,
DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION
A. K. HUNSBERGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
H. GORDON BLUNDON,
DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING
J. M. WRAY, JR., DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS
OFFICE OF DISTRICT ENGINEER
PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA 23803
P.O. Box 3036
Bon Air, Virginia 23235
Re: Speed Zoning - Routes 1 IS 36
Chesterfield County
This is to advise that the Highway Commissioner on October 11, 1973 authorized the
establishment or adjustment in speed zoning on Routes 1 and 36 in Chesterfield
County. This description is as follows:
Route Location
Route 1 Fr: 0.29 Mi, N. Rte. 619
To: NCL Colonial Heights
Route 36 Fr: Rte. 669
To: 0.30 Mi. E. Rte. 601
Route 36 Fr: 0.30 Mi. E. Rte. 601
To: 2.40 Mi. E. Rte. 602
Length Speed Limit
0.86 45 MPH
1.17 45 MPH
1.23 35 MPH
The above speed limits will be posted in the near future. They are the result of
a study that was made by our Traffic & Safety Division as per the Board's request.
If any additional information is needed, please advise.
Very truly yours,
E. L. Covingt6do Jr.
Resident Engineer
ELCjr/vcn
cc: Mr. L. R. Treat, Jr.
Mr. F. L. Isbell
A HIGHWAY. IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT
ti,e und:r igned, being interested in and the users of the road known
s Unnamed as Yet Road, be-inra.n-, at
a point on Route 671 , about 4 / 10 miles
South of Rt. 60 , and thence extending
�.n Westerly direction about 3/4 miles to
Powhatan County , do hereby join sith the landowners and
do request your Board and the Virginia Department of Highways to establish
as a part of the Secondary System of State Highways the aforned road.
We hereby aver that this road is needed and will be useful in nerving the
people living in this,area
Respectifully submitted for favorable considat9n�
INTERISST%p PARTIES AND USM, St
9
ti ��-
N
E
To thc. 110 cal' Supij.rvjsors of
Chesterfield County:
"r S, a petition r.:.s been or is being submitted to the
3u�rd 'S,r, .-v:�sors of�Stexfield --
Ccunty requesting
of
to
t
'tc:1 of State highways of a
li:J LGi:11J 4rl:nt as a part o1r the Secondary
certain road/street, said road/street beginning at a point on Route
_L.21-- , about
miles South Of
cc
kit . 60 , and thence extending; in a tarl -- y,�.� —
direction about 3/4
miles to �o�Thatan --
1 ._ (`nuns t_ V ,i and
y�;g�S, the said road/street proposed to be established
as a part of the Secondary System of State HighWays extends or will extend
along, through or over lands owned by the parties hereto;
NOW, TIIFREF02E, for and in consideration of the benefits
accruing or to accrue to t're undersigned landowners, said landowners do
hereby execute their consent to give antic
Chesterfield
County, without compensation, each as to the lands by him owned, an ease-
ment and right of way for said road/street along, through or over said
lands, said easement and right of way to be 50
feet in
width,, to, -ether with such additional widths as may
be necessary for the
extension and rn:intenance of road slopes -and/or ditches and all necessary
drainage facilities, said mghtn of way to be free from all encroachments.
IN 7JIVIES3 WHEREOF, wo havo hereunto set our hands and
9 th day of October , 19 73 •
seals this
' r (SEAL)
Ca't,7'1�'_ (SEAL)
/ (SEAL)
X, __.------ (SEAL)
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
__ (SEAL). _
�/ zxr `�ha� (SEAL)
(.SEAL)
(SEAL)
' (SEAL)
r
M
n
SANITARY LANDFILL AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made this 18th day of October, 1973 between
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE AND INSTITUTIONS,
hereinafter known as the DEPARTMENT, and the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
hereinafter known as the COUNTY.
WHEREAS: The parties do hereby agree as follows:
The Department being the Owner of a certain parcel of land,
hereinafter described, agrees to allow the County free use and access
to the said property for the purpose of the establishment and operation
of a sanitary landfill for the exclusive use of the County of Chester-
field and the Department of Welfare and Institutions. The County
agrees to establish and operate the said landfill in strict accordance
with all the requirements of the Bureau of Solid Waste and Vector
Control, Virginia State Health Department and the Virginia State Water
Control Board.
The County further agrees to secure the necessary permits, prepare a
site plan designating the boundaries of the proposed landfill and
outlining in detail the method of operation, all of which are to be
approved by the Department and designated regulatory agencies and -
attached to this agreement and becoming a part thereof.
The County agrees to install necessary fencing for the control of
off -hours dumping and the blowing of paper onto adjacent property,
and to provide a supervisor on duty during all hours of operation.
The County agrees to bring the existing sanitary landfill area up to
finish grade with a final cover of 2' of earth and hydro -seed. Each
section of the expansion area as it is completed shall be hydro -seeded
in accordance with latest highway specification.
Sari itaxy Landfilleement
Page 2-
The County agrees to allow local Institutions of the Department
free use of this facility for the disposal of its solid waste, which
may be hauled by the Institution, or a contract hauler, employed by
the Institution.
This agreement may be cancelled by either party upon thirty (30)
days written notice, and shall remain in force for a period of two
years from date at which time a new agreement may be negotiated. In
the event it becomes necessary for either party to exercise its right
under the thirty day cancellation clause, or if the agreement is not
renewed at the expiration of the two year agreement, the County agrees
to bring the entire area of disturbed earth to a uniform finish grade
and hydro -seed as outlined in Paragraph Four of this instrument.
The County shall require open body trucks hauling refuse to the
Sanitary Landfill to be covered in order to prevent littering the
roadway leading to the site and should provide police inspection
periodically to prevent littering and scavengers from operating at the
site.
The County shall notify the Department before any timber is cut and
all timber shall be cut under the direction of the Department and shall
remain the property of the Department.
The County agrees to provide a track -type frontend loader equal to a
Caterpillar 977 to move, compact, and cover the solid waste on the site
with 6" of earth daily. Provisions shall be made to provide adequate
standby equipment on the site which is to be used in the event the
above equipment becomes inoperable.
MA
1 Sanitary Landfill Agreement
Pale 3 r
Chair-- m— an,+'Boaild I of Supervisors
Esdcutive Secretary
1Uitness
Date
r
Asst. Director, De artment of
Welfare and Institutions
Witness
X%-r-, ,2 /11
'Date
MA
M
MEMORANDUM:
October 23, 1973
To: Mr. M. W. Burnett, County Administrator
From: T. S. Page, Airport Manager
Subject: Tee Hangar Leases
Since the Tee Hangars at the Airport are complete and
near ready to be opened for our customers, I would like to
recommend the County assign someone as a representative to
sign each of the Leases. My recommendation would be for
Mr. C. G. Manuel approved as primary authority and myself
as co-signer.
Thomas S. Page, Manager
Chesterfield County Airport
TSP:mm
M
M
SANITARY LANDFILL AGREF,"IENT
THIS AGREt;vIcN'r made this 18th
day of October, 1975 betweQn
TfiE CO` MON'NEAL1'H OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTi`iI;NT OF WELFARE, AND INSTITUTIONS,
horeinafter known as the DEPART`•IENT, and the COUNTY OF CIIESTERFIELD,
hereinafter known as the COUNTY.
WHEREAS: The parties do hereby agree as follows:
The Department being the Owner of a certain parcel of land,
hereinafter described, agrees to allow the County free use and access
to the said property for the purpose of the establishment and operation
of a sanitary landfill for the exclusive use of the County of Chester-
field and the Department of Welfare and Institutions. The County
agrees to establish and operate the said landfill in strict accordance
w;.th all the requirements of the Bureau of Solid Waste and Vector
Control, Virginia State Ilealtn Department and the Virginia State I%iater
Control Board.
Tho County- further agrees to secure -the necessary permits, prepare a
site plan designating the boundaries of the proposed landfill and
outlining in detail the method of operat:i.on, all of which are to be
approved by the Department and desi;;nated regulatory a;encies and
attached to this agreement and becomina a hart thereof.
r
The County agrees to install necessary fencing for the control of
or -hours dtzmpi_nt; and the blotring of raper onto adjacent property,
d to provide'a supervisor on duty during all 'hours of operation.
The Coiinty a�recs to bring the existing sanitary- landfill. area Lin to
iilish (Trade with a final cover OF 2' of earth and hydro -seed. Each
5r'ctioll of the exPansi.on area as it is completed shall be hydro -seeded
i;i accordance with latest hi hway sneciFication.
tary Landfill A etinent
The County agrees to allow local Institutions of the Department
free use of this facility for the disposal of its solid :caste, which
may be hauled by the Institution, or a contract hauler, employed by
the Institution.
This agreement may be cancelled by either party upon thirty (30)
days ,written notice, and shall remain in force for a period of two
years from date at which time a new agreement may be negotiated. In
the event it becomes necessary for either party to exercise its right
under the thirty day cancellation clause, or if the agreement is not
renewed at the expiration of the two year agreement, the County agrees
to bring the entire area of disturbed earth to a uniform finish grade
and hydro -seed as outlined in Parar;raph Four of this instrulr,ent.
The Couilt,r shall require oven body trucks hauling r-fus- to the
Sanitary Landfill to be covered ip. order to prevent littering the
road%v-ay leading to the site and should provi:'e police inspection
I)_riodically to prevent littering and scavengers from operating at the
Slte.
The Count), shall Ilotify the DepartmcnL beFOre ally timber is cut and
._11 tir,ber shall be cut under the .iirectior of the Dunartment and shall
remain the property of the Dopart:aeTit.
T _; Count), auroes to provide a tra Ckl-typo frontond loader equal to a
Ca< --. rnillar 977 to !hove, co;;mpact, and cover th-c solid vast-- on th-- site
:I. C)" ok erlrth daily. Provisions sha11 t .2ade to I�roti i:!e allec(t12te
S tai,,CLby eclu l'Jii-ent on the S lto wh?.c"`1 is to ha- z.ls .d In ti2:' e t th`
eduipmont becomes lnof)erable.
m
m
chairmian, 7Board 01, Supervisors
Exc;-cu—tjve Secretary
'N'itness
Director, Department of
Welfare and Institutions
Ildtness
Date Date
SUITE 810, 7th & FRANKLIN BUILDING
701 E. FRANKLIN STREET
RICHAOI ID, VIRGINIA 23219
CCnJjvCJL ON DRUG ABUSE CONTROL
October 18, 1973
Mr. Melvin W. Burnett
Executive Secretary
Chesterfield County
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
Dear Mr. Burnett:
This letter is written to request the contribution of Chester-
field County to the support of the Council On Drug Abuse Control
for fiscal year 1973-74. This request is being made as authorized
by the County's participation in CODAC as witnessed by its signing
of the Compact establishing this agency. As agreed upon the con-
tribution assigned to Chesterfield County consist of $.05 per resident
or the total sum of $4,396.75.
644-6110 — 648-0188
It is hoped that this amount will be forth coming so that CODAC
can continue to serve the people of Chesterfield County in the area
of drug abuse prevention and control.
Sincerely,
Ole,
Eugene T. Rilee, Jr.
Chairman - CODAC
ETR,Jr.:bic
M
COLONEL E. P. GILL
CHIEF OF POLICE
*40
E. T. SMITH
CAPTAIN OF DETECTIVES
W. E. MARTIN
CAPTAIN OF POLICE
C O U N T Y O F C H E S T E R F I E L D
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
POLICE D E P A R T M ENT
October 23, 1973
Honorable Board of Supervisors
County of Chesterfield
Chesterfield, Virginia
Dear Gentlemen:
I would like to recommend the appointment of Dispatcher Claude Lionel
Moore for the position of patrolman, and Ralph Edward Bartley for position
of Dispatcher.
EPG/jc
Respectfully,
Colonel E. P. Gill
Chief of Police
1973
E
CEIVEp
M
COLONEL E. P. GILL
CHIEF OF POLICE
M
E. T. SMITH
CAPTAIN OF DETECTIVES
W. E. MARTIN
CAPTAIN OF POLICE
COU N T Y OF CH E S T E R F I E L D
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
POLICE D E P A R T M ENT
October 23, 1973
Mr. M. W. Burnett
County Administrator
Chesterfield, Virginia
Dear Mr. Burnett:
I r
3
j0,W
1Y >
Claude Lionel Moore who I am recommending as a patrolman has been employed
as a dispatcher since October 1, 1971. He has never been late for work or lost
a day due to sickness. I feel he will make an excellent police officer for
the County of Chesterfield.
Ralph Edward Bartley who I am recommending to take Moore's place as a
dispatcher lives on Harrogate road, is 22 years old, 6'2, 187 lbs. He is a
high school graduate and was a police dispatcher with the Indiana State Police
from December '69 to May 1972. He left that employment to return to Virginia
to look after his elderly father. He is very familar with the teletype and
functions of a dispatcher.
At the present time he is employed by the State of Virginia as a Correctional
Officer with Unit #29 in Dinwiddie County.
Lt. Boyce, who is acting Superintendent, highly recommends him for this
position.
1 would appreciate it if you would get this approved at the October 24th
meeting so that these two men can begin their assignments on November 16, 1973.
This will fill all existing vacancies.
Respectfully submitted,
e, /? 4'.
Colonel E. P. Gill
Chief of Police
EPG/jc
M
COLONEL E. P. GILL
CHIEF OF POLICE
In
E. T. SMITH
CAPTAIN OF DETECTIVES
W. E. MARTIN
CAPTAIN OF POLICE
COU N T Y OF CH E S T E R F I E L D
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
POLICE D E P A R T M ENT
October 19, 1973
Honorable Board of Supervisors
County of Chesterfield
Chesterfield, Virginia
Gentlemen:
At a meeting of the Chesterfield Policemen's Pension and Retirement Board
held October 11, 1973, a motion was made and approved that the Board of Super-
visors be requested to increase the retirement allowance from one and one quarter
per cent of the highest five years of average income multiplied by the number of
years of creditable service, to one and one half per cent of the highest five
years of average income multiplied by the number of years of creditable service.
It is also requested that the Board of Supervisors increase the disability payment
benefits, death benefits to widows and children, and benefits for members who
have resigned or separated from the department with fifteen years of creditable
service from one and one quarter per centum to one and one half per centum. The
motion also included a request to change the minimum retirement benefits of any
member who has reached the age of 60 years or over and has 25 years of creditable
service from $175 monthly minimum retirement to $200 monthly minimum retirement.
From computations made using the suggested figures, this would amount to a
twenty per cent increase in benefits over the ordinance that was adopted by the
Board of Supervisors on November 26, 1968.
A motion was also approved by the Chesterfield Policemen's Pension and Retire-
ment Board that the Retirement Board be authorized to increase or decrease the
retirement payment annually based on the increase or decrease in the cost of living
according to the Consumer's Price Index using 1973 as a base year. However, the
Retirement Board would not be authorized to decrease the retirement payments below
the pensioner's earned pension.
The Chesterfield Policemen's Pension and Retirement Board agreed to meet with a
representative from the Virginia Retirement System to determine if a better retirement
system was available to the police. However, due to the cost of living change since
1968 when the Chesterfield County Pension and Retirement System was last updated,
the Retirement Board requests action be taken on the increase in pensioner's benefits
as soon as possible to relieve the hardship on the memebers presently on retirement.
Respectfully,
Colonel E. P. Gill, President
Chesterfield Policemen's Pension and Retirement
EPG/lw Board
M
MID -CITIES CIVIC ASSOCIATION, INC.
Quinnford Blvd.
Richmond, Virginia
August 13, 1973
We the Board of Directors of the Mid -Cities Civic
Association, Inc., located in Chesterfield County,
Bermuda District on Quinnford Blvd in Bellwood Manor
request a permit to conduct Bingo games, and delegate
to Virginia Brown authority to organizing all games.
We have read the condition of said permit and
agree to comply with t m.
�97,7
r
IM
APPLICATION FOR BINGO AND/OR RAFFLE PERMIT
The undersigned applicant, pursuant to the provisions of
Section 18,1-316 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, hereby
petitions the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County for a
one-year permit to conduct Bingo games and/or raffles.
1, The applicant, in support of this petition, says that it
is a proper organization to conduct such Bingo games and/or raffles
because (state here the kind of organization requesting said permit)
The Mid —Cities Civic Association is a community center
2. An authenticated copy of a resolution of the Board of
Directors or other governing body of said organization requesting
said permit is attached hereto, together with supporting evidence
that said organization is an organization permitted to conduct Said
Bingo games and/or raffles under Section 18.1-316 of the 1950 Code
of Virginia, as amended.
3. The applicant further states that it has read all of the
conditions which will be a part of said permit and agrees to comply
therewith,
APPLICANT
By«
STATE OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY of CHESTERFIELD, to -wit:
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of�� ,
19 7 3,
My commission expires:
797
17
Pe-, 36 i / i 7 i
Notary u lic
M
M
APPLICATION FOR BINGO AND/OR RAFFLE PERMIT
The undersigned applicant, pursuant to the provisions of
Section 18.1-316 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, hereby
petitions the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County for a
one-year permit to conduct Bingo games and/or raffles.
1. The applicant, in support of this petition, says that it
is a proper organization to conduct such Bingo games and/or raffles
because (state here the kind of organization requesting said permit)
it is, a frate rna 1 and charitable orpgnization dedicated to the care of orphaned
nhiIdrPn of deceased members gnd to serve aged members and their wives in their
2. An authenticated copy of a resolution of the Board of
Directors or other governing body of said organization requesting
said permit is attached hereto, together with supporting evidence
that said organization is an organization permitted to conduct said
Bingo games and/or raffles under Section 18.1-316 of the 1950 Code
of Virginia, as amended.
3. The applicant further states that it has read all of the
conditions which will be a part of said permit and agrees to comply
therewith.
APPLICANT Manchester -Richmond Lodge No. 699
B Y yal er of Moose
ecre ary
STATE OF VIRGINIA Cl��--
COUNTY of CHESTERFIELD, to -wit:
197
Subscribed and sworn to before me this /% day of SttZi�`z ,
� JJ ----
My commission expires: q �/D / �%%
Notary u
,s
x�a t
A� f t�
W
MANCHESTER-RICHMOND LODGE No. 699
LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE
Richmond, Virginia
4qW'y
M. Sxiaer, Secretary October 17, 1973
Rt. 1. Box 3
rerfield. Virginia 23832
Board of Supervisors
Chesterfield County
Chesterfield, Va. 23832
Dear Sirs:
We herewith submit our application for permission to conduct
Bingo Games and/or Raffles.
Enclosed is the necessary authenticated copy of our resolution
and a copy of the Constitution and General Laws of the Order,
where, on Pages 3 and 4, are outlined the Purposes of our Order,
which is the supporting evidence needed.
The address of our Lodge will be
11110 Trade Road,
Richmond, Va. 23235
but please mail the permit to the Secretary at the Chesterfield
address above.
Sincerely,
Manchester -Richmond Lodge No. 699
Loyal Order of Moose
A.'O� ° _ Secretary
,t ai'*
At
OLT 197a v,
RECEIVED
Firols
Ill' „ti
\� YIA A
M
n
At the regular meeting of the Manchester -Richmond Lodge No. 699,
Loyal Order of Moose held on Oxtober 15, 1973, the following
resolution w4s adopted.
Be it resolved by the membership of the Manchester -Richmond
Lodge No. 699, Loyal Order of Moose, to make application to the
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County for permission to
conduct Bingo Games and/or Raffles.
The above is a true and correct copy of the resolution adopted.
Manchester -Richmond Lodge No. 699
Loyal Order of Moose/
By __ LGovernor
Attest:
n
E5
Mr. Leo Myers
Bermuda District Supervisor
Chesterfield County
Chester, Virginia
Dear Mr. Myers:
9709 Kerwin Road
Richmond, Virginia 23234
October 23, 1973
Attached is a copy of a plat of the Quail Oaks area which we
recently discussed. This involves cleaning of a drainage ditch and
installation of three French type drainage ditches to enable proper
drainage in this area, especially during the spring and rainy seasons.
Our intentions are to construct a Little League Baseball and
Football field in this area which would accomodate the demands of our
growing community. We are presently using Bellwood Elementary School's
field, but the number of boys and girls enrolled in our athletic pro-
grams makes it necessary to have facilities of our own in addition to
the school's field.
Immediate action by the County would be most appreciative. We
need to start our construction as soon as possible, and if the County
could help us in this area, we could possibly begin use of these fields
during our next baseball and softball season.
If I can answer any questions you may have, or supply additional
information, please call me.
Sincerely,
Johnny F. Bosher, President
Quail Oaks Civic Association
i
9709 Kerfiin Road
Ricbmad, Virginia 23235
October 23, 1973
Mr. Carl Wise
Recreational Departmat
Chesterfield, Virginia
Dear Sir:
Enclosed is a copy of
a letter to Mr. Leo Myers concerning
recreation fields in the Quail Oaks area of Chesterfield County.
We need your approval
of the delivery and placement of
stone or gravel in this drainage
ditch. This will divert the water
from this area and,be carried off
to another area, rather than be
allowed to stand or rise to the
top of the ground in the proposed
recreational areas.
Your immiediate attention
to this matter will be greatly
appreciated.
If I can be of further
help in answering any of your ques-
tions, please call we'.
Yours truly,
Jbhnny F. Bother
President
Quail Oaks Civic Assoc.
{
m
m
nr-
lee- C on oke r-e
cot%
m
�r000w " Vvvy-ej
.,o f
00 dKdg 1644 — . _l
'14
MY kYg- 104P. 14- IoP& Rve, vs_ xe- -Jr:
o
_ ��i�/��'��'i'KG ✓ y?ZO✓� j /�(/f I� ��,Gs�f'6-�n - ,#�_c_-rr�JJZVI- 0// lecl-
e;'40
ee oy, v e
,� .-1 �� � yr• ..�.y, ��,
_ -_ ------ ----- -- -- - -
o
. �V/r ore r /7�o vc .r, /%lr ���•-raf• ..r �m,� : _ _ _ _ .A ell O'crat
c
000. X�-evwla-
70•31, 70-3 z !B -8s- ---- /_ - _ -
__ ____ I �e_4S% �' ✓._-.S T� ��%lQls/�C_�ivra_Qss_�Pt�_r�rQtis���_VTf±-�a���h_-- -_ ___
GE)
mor--- - --- --- - -
14- -040P
low
i
Ilk. 171
•
- - -I Crlt-J. _�/��� - �-Y�.� �i-- -��•w _cam,_- G'�,r�..,� -- 3r•¢�
Aft of- IS
_ 40'. et c- w+►-s
Rr, ool
- L 17
/t _ C!G'C✓q l� • GY�Y-'+ "Oad
_ a �► a, r,...} _Q h r --• _- av de. l % _ -4eor_ -_ - A d c .c .+mo o N c_