The URL can be used to link to this page

10-10-1973 Packett A t a re gu 1 a r meeting o£ t he B o a rd o£ S up a rvi s or s o f C he s t e r f ie 1 d C o unt y, Virginia , he l d a t t he C o ur t hou s e on October 3-0, 1973, at 9:00 A.M. AN ORD 2NANCE t o va cat e an unimp r ove d twenty-five C 2 5 fo o f wide a c ce s s r i gh t- o£ -wa y :L n t he s ub d iv i s i on o f Gr e eab r i a r, S e c t i on 2, known a nd designate d .3o a 25 £oo t t o ca t a d along t he a astern b oundr y 1 ine o f s a i d s ub d iv i s i on , a p l a t o f which made b y E_ O_ W i t ker s on , C_ L_ S_, Richmond , V it g i dated February 27, 3965, r e c orde ci June 1 6, 1 9 6 5, in t he O£ £ice o f the C it c s i t C our t o£ Chester f i e l d Coua t y, V it g is i a, in P l a t Book 1 4, pages 70 arid 7 1, t he s a i d unimproved sweat y- £ ive ( 2 5)o £o o f wide a c ce s s r i ght - o £- wa y t o b e vacate d b e ing more p a r t i cu 1 a r 1 y s h own cr o s s ha t the d on a copy o£ s aid p l a t date d F eb rua r y 27, 1 9 6 5, which i s a t t a the d her e t o and made a p a r t her e o£ b y t h i s r e £e r en ce WHEREAS, t h� B o a r d o f S up a rvi s or s o f Che s t er f i e l d County, Virginia , b y r e s o 1 u t i on du 1 y. adopted a t i t s r e gu 1 a r me e t iag he 1 d a t t he Co ur t hou s e on Atigt s t 22, T973, air e c t e d that: man ordinance b e p r ep a r e d for p ub t i c hearing on t he p r op o s e d vacation o f t he s aid twenty -five ( 2 5)1 in Gr eeab r is r S ub division , S e c t i on 2, known _a nd designate d no. a twenty-five < 2 5 fo o f wide a c c e s s r i g ht - o f -way , a s s hown on a p l a t made by E_ O. W i t ke r s on , C_ L_ S_, Richmond , Virginia , date d February 2 7, 1 9 6 5, t he said a c ce s s r ight - o£- wa y t o b e vacate d b e in g s hown cr o s s ha t the c on a c op y o£ t he said p l a t, which i s a t t a the d her e t o and made a ;par t her e o£ b y t hi s reference and b e ing mor e p a r t i cu 1 a r 1 y de s cr ib e c a s £ o l l ows , t o -wit COMMENCING a t i t s 1 iris o f intersection , b e iag 25 feet: in width , wit h t he s ou t he rn r i ght - o £-wa y I. iae o f Hor s e s kio e B end Drive e x t ends d t o a p o in t on t he eastern boundry -line of Greenbriar Subdivision, S e c t i on 2 t hence p r o ce e d iag s ou t hwa r d 1 y b e twe en p a r a 1 1 e 1 1 iris s for a d i s t a rice o£ 377 £e e t, more or l e s s, and t ermina t ing a t i t s 1 in.e o f inter - s e c t i on with the n or t hern b oundr y 1 iris o f Whit e B itch Drive e x t Bade d a rid c ont inu ing with i t s 1 fine o f intersection wit h t he s ou t hern r fight - o£- wa y 1 fine o f White B itch Drive extended in a s ou t hwa r d 1 y d it e c t i on b e twe en ne a r l y p a r a 1 1 e 1 1 in e s for a d i s t a rice o£ 1 9 7 £e e t, more or l e s s, a n d t ermina t ing with the n or t he ra b oundr y 1 fine o £ property now or former 1 y owned by ?S(.IUKI 0 s9 -AGE 240 WHEREAS, notice of the adoption of this ordinance has been given in accordance with Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Super- visors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia: 1. That pursuant to Section 15.1-482, of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, that the unimproved 25 foot wide access right-of-way as described above and shown crosshatched on the copy of plat attached hereto and described herein, be and it is hereby vacated, except however, the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, RESERVES to itself two perpetual 16 foot drainage and utility easements upon, over, across, under and through the said access right-of-way, one measures 16 feet being an extension of the easement across south end of lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block E. to the subdivision boundry line, and one measuring 16 feet in width, being an extension of the easement between lots 1 through 7, Block D, to the subdivision boundry line. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accordance with Section 15.1-482 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and a certified copy thereof, together with the plat attached, shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia. County Administrator ARGINIA: 1n t e Clerk's fice of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County,10 ✓y 7..., this Deed was presented and, - ay of. 19.�J with the certificate..._._.., admitted to record at.J.;....�.A'CIOck..-.,4�:.A' Teste �r ' Clerk -UP PV).SOR r+i-, 11kFIELD t ,5111in g�OZ . 197 y # FOR of Supervisors F&q �jBoard Nf +� Case No. 12,. 4 'r viij /A Y '� lc' ' � ' ?30 Board of Zoning Appeals Fee Receipt No P APPLICATION TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION SHALL B: TYPED OR PRIN'1ED AND COMPLETED IN FULL 1. EXPLAIN FULLY THE REQUEST DESIRED R-2 & A) REZONING: From Agriculture ( A ) To Residential ( R-7 ) Type of uses proposed: sinLYfamily and tnwnhnnsP B) CONDITIONAL USE: C) VARIANCE: D) SPECIAL EXCEPTION: 2. A ) NAME OF APPLICANT: Mason Property. Associates B) MAILING ADDRESS: 5905 West Broad Street, Rirhmnnd, Virginia C) TELEHONE NO. : 285-9054 D) NAME OF PRESENT OWNER OF PROPERTY ON WHICH THIS REQUEST WILL OCCUR: Lawrence E. Mason and Florence Miller E) MAILING ADDRESS: R Chesterfield Count Richmond- Virginia F TEL PHONE NO.:275-1636 G) NAME OF PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: Paul Byrne, Esq- - Bremner, Byrne & Baber H) ADDRESS: 7th & Franklin Office -Bldg., Suite 1500 Richmond, Virginia I TELEPHONE NO.: 644-0721 3• IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, EXPLAIN: (A Copy of pending contract or option agreement shall be attached hereto and made a part of this application.) LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION (Following information shall be obtained from the Office of the County Assessor, Room 213) 66-7-4 4. A) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Dale B) TAX MAP NO 66-7-2 C) SEC. NO. - D) SUBDIVISION NO. E) BLOCK NO.� F ) LOT OR PARCEL NO. 244 G ) STREET ADDRESS Beulah Road H) SOURCE OF TITLE FOR ALL PROPERTIES INVOLVED DEED BOOK PAGE 5. STATE THE REASON FOR THIS REQUEST: To allow construction of residential community 6. STATE HOW THIS REQUEST WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS OR THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD: This residential community is in keeping with the development of this area and should enhance the value of surrounding properties. 7. EXPLAIN ANY EXISTING USE PERMIT, SPECIAL EXCEPTION, CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE GRANTED PREVIOUSLY ON THE PARCEL IN QUESTION: (None to our knowledge.) 8. A) EXISTING LAND USE (S) : Private dwelling - rural B ) EXISTING STRUCTURE (S) : Ouse TYPE residential USE: (same) C ) EXISTING ZONING: Agriculture Joe D) TOTAL ACREAGE OF THE REQUEST: acres 9. GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT, ACROSS THE ROAD OR HIGHWAY AND FACING THE PROPERTY AND ANY OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM SUCH PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY AFFECTED IS SITUATED AT OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY TWO OR MORE ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEED OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY ROAD OR HIGHWAY WITH A RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OR AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS OF ANY TWO RAILROADS, GIVE NAMES OF PROPERTY OWNERS AT ALL CORNERS OF ANY SUCH INTERSECTION. (Following information MUST BE obtained by the applicant from the office of the County Assessor, Room 213). A) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Benjamin F . and Dorothy B . .Tones MAILING ADDRESS: 2502 Alexander Avenue, Richmond, Virilnia TAX MAP NO.: 66-7 (1)-5 SUBD. NAME: - LOT or PARCEL: - BLOCK: - SECTION: - B ) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Edna Harris Robinson MAILING ADDRESS: 4505 Beulah Road, Richmond, Virginia TAX MAP NO.: 66-7 (1)-6 SUBD. NAME: ' - LOT or PARCEL BLOCK: SECTION: - C ) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Alberta H. Lively MAILING ADDRESS: 4501 Beulah Road- Richmond, Virginia TAX MAP NO.: 66-7(1)-7 SUBD. NAME: - LOT or PARCEL: - BLOCK: - SECTION: - D ) PROPERTY OWNER' S NAME: David C . Pearson MAILING ADDRESS: 4435 Beulah Road, Richmond, Virginia TAX MAP NO.: 66- - , 66-7(1)-9 SUBD. NAME: - LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: -2- E 0) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Alice Robinson Fore MAILING ADDRESS: c/o Lucious Robinson, 4601 Beulah Road, Richmond, Va TAX MAP NO.: 66-11(1)-4 P) Parcel 66-11(1)-2 - Not in file 10) THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE FEE REQUIRED. A FEE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, ROOM 307. 11) CHECK OR MONEY ORDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO: TREASURER, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD 12) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION EITHER THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY TAX MAP OR A SURVEYED PLAT OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL. 13) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION ANY PERTINENT SITE PLANS OR TENTATIVE PLATS. NOTE: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS MAY DELAY THE SCHEDULING OF REQUESTS. 14) I/WE HEREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ANY EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE: June 25 1973 SIGNATURE OF AGENT (Name of person other than, but acting for the applicant, filling out all or a part of this appli- cation) K. ffi - C;' V� - A"7 �- STYRE OF YPLICANT (Same name as used inem 2-A, Page 1) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THISDAY OF ,1973 , MY COMMISSION EXPIRES c�� /� , 19 77 NOTARY -4- AR ) (.''i- :,'v,"_; •��; +rry CHES; ,FIE LG /fit CHESTERFIELD, " oa FOR OFFICE of Supervisors USE ONLY ,* Case No. �a CNi,, ^ TBo of Zoning Appeals Fee Receipt No �S # �CATION TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION .SHALL B�.' TYPED OR PRINTLD AND COMPLETED IN FULL 1. EXPLAIN FULLY THE REQUEST DESIRED A) REZONING: From no( ) To ( ) Type of use(s) proposed: fahric;iion Mar}�inca vhprn�, B) CONDITIONAL USE: C) VARIANCE. D) SPECIAL EXCEPTION: 2. A) NAME OF APPLICANT: Vivian Earl Pace and Pauline Goodman Pace B) MAILING ADDRESS: 4799 D) NAME OF PRESENT OWNER OF PROPERTY ON WHICH THISznURz REQUEST.W��4B OCCUR: =harrier C`nmpanv E ) MAILINr�D��'� e --_ .,ESE . : G) NA 1160N I0 BE NOTIFIED IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: H) ADDRESS: I TELZPHONE NO.: 232-�711 3• IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, EXPLAIN: (A Copy of pending contract or option agreement shall be attached hereto and made a part of this application.) LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION (Following information shall be obtained from the Office of the County Assessor, Room 213) 4. A) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Clover Hill B) TAX MAP No. 40_2(1) 20-6 C) SEC. NO. D) SUBDIVISION NO. E) BLOCK NO. F) LOT OR PARCEL NO. G) STREET ADDRESS H) SOURCE OF TITLE FOR ALL PROPERTIES INVOLVED DEED BOOK 84 PAGE_ 34 5 . STATE THE REASON FOR THIS REQUEST: prptRPtf} �nninar rive CeQUired lice—� glow 6. STATE HOW THIS REQUEST WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO T ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS OR THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD: HE the entire area, 7. EXPLAIN ANY EXISTING USE PERMIT, SPECIAL EXCEPTION, CONDITION OR VARIANCE GRANTED PREVfOUSLY ON THE PARCEL IN QUESTION: AL USE 8. A) EXISTING LAND USE(S): None B) EXISTING STRUCTURE(S): None USE: C) EXISTING ZONING:_ D) TOTAL ACREAGE OF lttE REQUEST. ii iE ii ii # iF iE iF 4 9. GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT, ACROSS THE ROAD OR HIGHWAY AND FACING THE PROPERTY AND ANY OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM SUCH PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY AFFECTED IS SITUATED AT OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY TWO OR MORE ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEED OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY ROAD OR HIGH14AY WITH A RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OR AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS OF ANY TWO RAILROADS, GIVE NAMES OF PROPERTY OWNERS AT ALL CORNERS OF ANY SUCH INTERSECTION. (Following information MUST BE obtained by the applicant from the office of the County Assessor, Room 213). A) PROPEPTY OWNER'S NAME:_ Mercer B Baud han MAILING ADDRESS:_2500 rood fc RriAa —'---- TAX MAP NO.. �E-Road- Rinhmnn V�_ is dn_2�T� �n-4 SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: B) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: 4— n=1_� �A BD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL BLOCK: SECTION: C) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME_ L. Ho harrier Cn MAILING ADDRESS: c/o DOlomal Mn}.,,. r ,-es Ce.. Hi h Pein Tnr h ar TAX MAP NO .: 4n" SUBD. NAME: C g— '�--`'" 49A LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: D) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: g_ T._ u.,.,i_ r.______ _ MAILING ADDRESS: c/o Colonial Motor Lines Co. High Point N. C. 27260 TAX MAP NO.: 40-2 (1) 20-3 SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: -2- E ) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Curtis L. Rudolph MAILING ADDRESS: 168 East Belt Boulevard, Richmond Vir inia 23224 TAX MAP NO.: 40-2(1) 21 SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: F ) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: A. W. Grandts 7MAILING ADDRESS: 3000 W. Leigh Street, Richmond, Va. 23230 TAX MAP NO.: 40-2aj 23 SUBD. NAME: LOT o° PARCEL: 'LOCK: SECTION: G) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.., SiJBD . NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: H) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: I) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: J) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: K) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: L) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. DAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: M) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: _SUBD. SECTION: N) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE USE THE BACK OF PAGES 2 & 3 -3- 10) THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE FEE REQUIRED. A FEE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, ROOM 307. 11) CHECK OR MONEY ORDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO: TREASURER, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD 12) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATIOM EITHER THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY TAX MAP OR A SURVEYED PLAT OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL. 13) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION ANY PERTINENT SITE PLANS OR TENTATIVE PLATS. NOTE: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS MAY DELAY THE SCHEDULING OF REQUESTS. 14 ) I/WE HEREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE STA.TEME14TS A:NTD THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ANY EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE: July 30 , 197 3 . THOMAS, & FARLEY (Name of person othe4 th but acting for the applicant, filling out all or a part of this ppli- cation) SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT (Same name as used in Item 2-A, Page 1) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 2( DAY OF`- ,19772' . MY COMMISSION EXPIRES p,"' IS- lg % , r NOTARY , -4- P")ARD OF SUPERVISORS pr' CHESTERFIELD COUNTI, 8HFSTiERK1EbD&WAjj # # # # # # # # q `' E' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY # Boarc {'d$73Sup isors Case No . 7 _S-Il # • CJ Bfttd of ,on Appeals Fee * Receipt No.5��1* �:RGtN;Ay�JNTY APPL HE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OFF SUPERVISORS OR G` BOARD QF 70NING APPEALS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION SHALI, B- TYPED OR PRIN"iLD AND COMPLETED IN FULL # * # # # * # * # # # # 1. EXPLAIN FULLY THE REQUEST DESIRED A) REZONING: From To Type of uses proposed: B) CONDITIONAL USE: C) VARIANCE: D) SPECIAL EXCEPTION: # * # * # # # # * # # * 2. A) NAME OF APPLICANT: Y B) MAILING ADDRESS: D) NAME OF PRESENT OWNER OF PROPERTY 0 WHICH THISEREQUEST. OCCUR: WILL E) MAILING ADDRESS: S Q ", F TELEPHONE NO.: G) NAME OF PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: Y1b n e_ H) ADDRESS: I TELEPHONE NO.: 3• IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, EXPLAIN: (A Copy of pending contract or option agreement shall be attached hereto and made a part of this application.) LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION (Following information shall be obtained from the Office of the County Assessor, Room 213) 4. A) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT N,o,,,. B) TAX MAP NO. / a - C) SEC. NO. D) UBDIVISION N0. E) BLOCK N F) LOT OR PARCEL NO, j G) STREET ADDRESS H) SOURCE OF TITLE FOR ALL ROPERTIES INVOLVED DEED BOOK PAGE 5. STATE THE REASD FOR THIS REQUEST: 1 )e�ir� �r, 1A kc) e- 6. STATE HOW THIS REQUEST WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS O(R'/THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORH00j}1'��: J� . 7. EXPLAIN ANY EXISTING USE PERMIT, SPECIAL EXCEPTION, CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE GRANTED PREVIOUSLY ON THE PARCEL IN QUESTION: 8. A) EXISTING LAND USE(S): ' S � B) EXISTING STRUCTURE(S): USE: C) EXISTING ZONING: D) TOTAL ACREAGE OF THE REQUEST: 9. GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT, ACROSS THE ROAD OR HIGHWAY AND FACING THE PROPERTY AND ANY OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM SUCH PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY AFFECTED IS SITUATED AT OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY TWO OR MORE ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEED OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY ROAD OR HIGHWAY WITH A RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OR AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS OF ANY TWO RAILROADS, GIVE NAMES OF PROPERTY OWNERS AT ALL CORNERS OF ANY SUCH INTERSECTION. (Following information MUST BE obtained by the applicant from the office of the County Assessor, Room 213). A) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: B) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: — 1% Cx MAILING ADDRESS: f )o t I e>v-m v-; Ue ., , 4 TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL_ j 7 BLOCK: SECTION: C) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: fient4vo.,j) At MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: I - SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: a - / BLOCK: SECTION: Bi PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: t i. TAX MAP NO.: - LOT or PARCEL: -2- E) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME_ MAILING ADDRESS: ` - 7 TAX MAP NO.: jk-1-1-201 LOT or PARCEL: F) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO .: ---11 LOT o- , PARCEL: SUBD. NAM$: CK: SECTION: SUBD. NA 2_ )EC ION: G) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SIJBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: H) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: I) PROPERTY OWPJER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: J) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: K) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK; SECTION: L) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX M,AP NO.: SUBD. _JAME : LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: M) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: _SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: N) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE USE THE BACK OF PAGES 2 & 3 -3- 10) THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE FEE REQUIRED. A FEE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, ROOM 307. 11) CHECK OR MONEY ORDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO: TREASURER, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD 12) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATIONT EITHER THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY TAX MAP OR A SURVEYED PLAT OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL. 13) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION ANY PERTINENT SITE PLANS OR TENTATIVE PLATS. NOTE: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS MAY DELAY THE SCHEDULING OF REQUESTS. 14) I/WE HEREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND THE STATEMEN CONTAI D IN ANY EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE: 197 -1 (Name of person other than, but acting for the applicant, filling out all or a part of this appli- cation) SIGN&TURE OF` —APPLICANT (Same name as used in Item 2-A, Page 1) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO PfFORE ME THI$ DAY OFF MY COMMISSION EXPIRES n$o NOTARY -4- Z112/ ,197 BOARD OF SUPERMORS t, 4"i- �' CHEST"FIELD COUNTY, CHESTERFIELD, VA. � Board of SFOR OFFICE USE ONLY Supervisors # Case No. 73 5� %Z0 Board of Zoning Appeals Fee Receipt W �C APPLICATION TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION .SHALL B-4.1 TYPED OR PRINTED AND COMPLETED IN FULL 1. EXPLAIN FULLY THE REQUES 1234 ) REZONING: From '51 Typ f u4e (s� AL USE: 2. A) NAME OF APPLICANT: B) MAILING ADDRESS: , D) E) OCCUR: MAILIN DESIRED osea: To CH THIS REQUEST W G) NAME OF PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT: AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER:c_ H) ADDRESS: IT TELEPHONE NO.: 3. IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, EXPLAIN: (A Copy of pending contract or option agreement shall be attached hereto and made a part of this application.) LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION (Following information shall be obtained from the Office of the County Assessor, Room 213) 4. A) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICqc�'qt'e/ - B) TAX MAP NO. /%- / LD C) SEC. NO. D SUBDIVISION NO. E) BLOCK NO. F) LOT OR PARCEL NO. G) STREET ADDRESS H) SOURCE OF TITLE FOR ALL PROPERTIES INVOLVED DEED -BOOK PAGE 5. STATE THE, REASON )FOR THIS REQUEST: - " ran � /1/J(-. 2v,/j.1, `I-, �' iJ ,-, 6. STATE HOW THIS REQUEST WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJACENT PRO ERTY OWNERS OR THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD: �-� 7. EXPLAIN ANY EXISTING USE PERMIT, SPECIAL EXCEPTION, CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE GRANTED PREVIOUSLY ON THE PARCEL IN QUESTION: 8. A) EXISTING LAND USE (S) B) EXISTING STRUCTURE(S): USE: r, C) EXISTING ZONING: D ) TOTAL ACREAGE OF --THE EQUEST: 9. GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT, ACROSS THE ROAD OR HIGHWAY AND FACING THE PROPERTY AND ANY OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM SUCH PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY AFFECTED IS SITUATED AT OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY TWO OR MORE ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEED OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY ROAD OR HIGHWAY WITH A RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OR AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS OF ANY TWO RAILROADS, GIVE NAMES OF PROPERTY OWNERS AT ALL CORNERS OF ANY SUCH INTERSECTION. (Following information MUST BE obtained by the applicant from the office of the County Assessor, Room 213). I). A) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: 7A TAX MAP NO .: / 7— D SU 9D . LOT or PARCEL:1 BLOCK: 9E C) D) SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S 14AM % -/(,' MAILING ADDRESS : C> V,(y. TAX MAP NO.: /7- SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL / BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME. MAILING ADDRESS: Q 97 . ;� ,.✓. TAX MAP NO,:/ -10 ,/ SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: 5 ,,o IZ, BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: -2- E) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: F) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: 3L0 SECTION: G) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: H) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: I) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: J) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: K) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: L) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD_.__ NA LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: M) PROPERTY MAILING TAX MAP LOT or P OWNER'S ADDRESS: NO.: - NAME: SUBD. NAME: SECTION: N) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: LOCK: SECTION: FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE USE THE BACK OF PAGES 2 & 3 -3- 10) THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE FEE REQUIRED. A FEE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, ROOM 307. 11) CHECK OR MONEY ORDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO: TREASURER, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD 12) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION EITHER THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY TAX MAP OR A SURVEYED PLAT OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL. 13) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION ANY PERTINENT SITE PLANS OR TENTATIVE PLATS. NOTE: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS MAY DELAY THE SCHEDULING OF REQUESTS. 14) I/WE HEREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ANY EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE: 197-2-. SIGNATUREOF AGENT (Name of person other than, but acting for the applicant, filling out all or a part of this appli- cation) Page 1) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEF RE ME THIS DAY OF MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 'YL/t_' S� , 19 7 . 2-j--t� NOTARY -4- BOARD OF SUPERv1SC^S. � 3 CHESTERFIELD COUNI'Y CHESTERFIELD, VA. * FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Board of Supervisors Case No . L / Board of Zoning Appeals Fee Receipt No.3 ((i1 APPLICATION TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OR BOARD OF 70NING APPEALS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION SHALI, B' TYPED OR PRIN"12D AND COMPLETED IN FULL 1. EXPLAIN FULLY THE REQUEST DESIRED A) REZONING: From Agricultural M-V To Industrial ( M-2 Type of use ( s)proposed : 100 An, Fond nrcieess i na: I B) CONDITIONAL USE: C) VARIANCE: D) SPECIAL EXCEPTION: t..fD c11ESTIVIELo ce FT, , �`,S� # * # # # # # # # # # # YlR61NlA UMW • , 2. A) NAME OF APPLICANT: wil-Car Cornnany. Inc_ B) MAILING ADDRESS: TELEHO E NO.: 643-8363 D) NAME OF PRESENT OWNER OF PROPERTY ON WHICH THIS REQUEST WILL OCCUR: wi l-Car Co_, 'ram,—(64_B5 Ac) l Dr. A_ T_ BrickhoLaa (92 90 Ac. ) E) MAILING ADDRESS: d 43-8361. Brickhouse: Medical Blda., Hopewell V$' TELEPHONE NO.: 458-8111 G) NAME OF PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: R. E. Porter H) ADDRESS: Porter Realty Comparty. P. O. Box 6482 Richmond Virginia 3 0 I TELEPHONE NO.: 353-7994 3. IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, EXPLAIN: (A Copy of pending contract or option agreement shall be attached hereto and made a part of this application.) LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION (Following information shall be obtained from the Office of the County Assessor, Room 213) Zoning Sec. Sheet 3 117-10-(1) 16 4. A) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Bermuda B) TAX MAP N0. 117- 9-(11 5 C) SEC. NO. D) SUBDIVISION NO. E) BLOCK NO. F) LOT OR PARCEL NO. G) STREET ADDRESS H) SOURCE OF TITLE FOR ALL PROPERTIES INVOLVED DEED BOOK PAGE Wil-Car: Deed Book 935, Page 172 Brickhouse: Deed Book 284, Page 362 5. STATE THE REASON FOR THIS REQUEST: The current M-1 annina nf wit..r_r Property does not meet the ra=ui r&m&nt. of the prospecti;we .Is-.-__ 6. STATE HOW THIS REQUEST WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS OR THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD: The principal uses of the 2xapa! �iy wl t i ba ws oa+n., naina-_ for fond pro_ cesaing which could necessitate some outside.storaae. Any outside storaae will not be obnoxious as to odors, nor will it t ab ,,u.iabtiy Land improvements will be attractive in d.sian— Any ■�rskaa tank "411 be on the rail side. * c ceag. s;�r*08*t ,pV*bors will be landscaped with 7. EXPLAIN ANY EXISTING USE PERMIT, SPECIAL EXCEAfON'4�0%3r?'IONAZgTSE OR VARIANCE GRANTED PREVIOUSLY ON THE PARCEL IN QUESTION: 8. A) EXISTING LAND USE(S): B) EXISTING STRUCTURE(S): Komi USE: C) EXISTING ZONING: gr 4 eo3,k1 t3lral D) TOTAL ACREAGE OF THE REQUEST: 152- 75 Ac. 9. GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT, ACROSS THE ROAD OR HIGHWAY AND FACING THE PROPERTY AND ANY OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM SUCH PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY AFFECTED IS SITUATED AT OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY TWO OR MORE ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEED OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY ROAD OR HIGHWAY WITH A RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OR AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS OF ANY TWO RAILROADS, GIVE NAMES OF PROPERTY OWNERS AT ALL CORNERS OF ANY SUCH INTERSECTION. (Following information MUST BE obtained by the applicant from the office of the County Assessor, Room 213). A) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: SNE ArMCWD sTMIeW MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: B) PROPERTY OWNER'S 14AME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL BLOCK: SECTION: C) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: D) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: -2- E) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: F) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX I1AP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT o, PARCEL: "LOCK: SECTION: G) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: STJBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: H) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: I) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: J) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: K) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: L) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: M) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: N) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE USE THE BACK OF PAGES 2 & 3 -3- 10) THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE FEE REQUIRED. A FEE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, ROOM 307. 11) CHECK OR MONEY ORDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO: TREASURER, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD 12) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATIOM EITHER THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY TAX MAP OR A SURVEYED PLAT OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL. 13) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION ANY PERTINENT SITE PLANS OR TENTATIVE PLATS. NOTE: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS MAY DELAY THE SCHEDULING OF REQUESTS. 14) I/WE HEREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE STATEMETTS A�-?D THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ANY EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE: August 27 , 197 3 - SIGNATURE GE INT (Name of person other than, but acting for the applicant, filling out all or a part of this appli- cation) S GNA E 0 j' (Same name as used i Item 2-A, Page 1) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS -� 7e/ DAY OF "e4� ,l97 -3-. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES , 19 My Commissi do Expires November N,1974 �GGGGr _ v%% iiC ,esti NOTARY _ —4— # Board o S fpprV;iso s_ x s CHEsrf;,ri�!a �f Board o nitas7l��q 0 iA E30Apn �F SUPERVISORS. CHEST .% CHESTERFIELD C0UNT, GOFFICE USE ONLY Case No. � lJ � s Fee Receipt No.- Sys �71 ct 6- APPLICATION TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION .SHALL B, TYPED OR PRINTED AND COMPLETED IN FULL 1. EXPLAIN FULLY THE REQUEST DESIRED A) REZONING: From ( ) To ( ) Type of uses proposed: B) CONDITIONAL USE: C) VARIANCE: D) SPECIAL EXCEPTION: 2. A) NAME OF APPLICANT: eel E4 B ) MAILING ADDRESS: c F os ev a 3S TE EHONE NO. %476 SI_6flome D) NAME OF PRESENT OWNER OF PROPERTY ON WHICH THIS REQUEST WILLF _1A if fire X OCCUR: HAm I,¢, a - ./ :r E) MAILING ADDRESS: o///u C'p F TELEPHONE NO.: 47 G) NAME OF PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT A D/OR PROPERTY OWNER: H) ADDRESS: I TELEPHONE NO.: 3. IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, EXPLAIN: (A Copy of pending contract or option agreement shall be attached hereto and made a part of this application.) LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION (Following information shall be obtained from the Office of the County Assessor, Room 213) / // 4. A) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT V� B) TAX MAP NO. ` 3 C) SEC. NO. D) SUBDIVISION NO. E) BLOCK NO. F) LOT OR PARCEL NO. 16 - � G) STREET ADDRESS H) SOURCE OF TITLE FOR ALL PROPERTIES INVOLVED DEED BOOK PAGE 5. STATE THE REASON FOR THIS REQUEST: , 0 6. STATE HOW THIS REQUEST WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS OR THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD: 7. EXPLAIN ANY EXISTING USE PERMIT, SPECIAL EXCEPTION, CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE GRANTED PREVIOUSLY ON THE PARCEL IN QUESTION: 8. A) EXISTING LAND USE(S): B) EXISTING STRUCTURE(S)- USE: ON C) EXISTING ZONING: D) TOTAL ACREAGE OF THE 9. UV T: # # # # # # # # # # # GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT, ACROSS THE ROAD OR HIGHWAY AND FACING THE PROPERTY AND ANY OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM SUCH PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY AFFECTED IS SITUATED AT OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY TWO OR MORE ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEED OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY ROAD OR HIGHWAY WITH A RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OR AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS OF ANY TWO RAILROADS, GIVE NAMES OF PROPERTY OWNERS AT ALL CORNERS OF ANY SUCH INTERSECTION. (Following information MUST BE obtained by the applicant from the office of the County Assessor, Room 213). A) 9E C) D) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: y � TAX MAP NO.: 6 -371-1 LOT or PARCEL: 11, - PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL PROPERTY OWNER'S DAME: MAILING ADDRESS : (70 C TAX MAP NO.: 3 LOT or PARCEL: / SECTION: NAME: SECTION: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: f - TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: / 5 BLOCK: SECTION: -2- 4rue E) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: F) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: 3LOCK: SECTION: G) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: H) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: I) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: J) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: K) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: L) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: M) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SiTRD . NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: N) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE USE THE BACK OF PAGES 2 & 3 -3- 10) THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE FEE REQUIRED. A FEE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, ROOM 307. 11) CHECK OR MONEY ORDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO: TREASURER, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD 12) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION EITHER THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY TAX MAP OR A SURVEYED PLAT OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL. 13) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION ANY PERTINENT SITE PLANS OR TENTATIVE PLATS. NOTE: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS MAY DELAY THE SCHEDULING OF REQUESTS. 14) I/WE HEREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ANY EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE: Nu�ius7` 197 SIGNATURE OF AGENT (Name of person other than, but acting for the applicant, filling out all or a part of this appli- cation) SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT (Same name as used in Item 2-A, Page 1) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO B ORE ME THIS ZY DAY OF �'�,,[ ,1973 . MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOTARY -4- VIRGINIA: At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, held at the Courthouse on October 10, 1973 at 9:00 A.M. Present: Mr. Irvin G.Horner, Chairman 1�,ir, Leo Myers, Vice -Chairman Mr, J.Ruffin Apperson Nir. A.J.Krepela hr. E.Nierlin CtNeill Also Present: IIr. Oliver D. Rudy, Comm. Atty. Mr. F,.W.Burnett, Co. Administrator Mr. C.G.il,anuel, Asst.Co.Admin. Mr, Robt. A.Painter, Co. Engineer iIr. David Welchons,Asst. Co.Eng. Mr. Michael Ritz, Co.Planner i,ir. Stan Balderson} Chief Planner The invocation was given by Mr. Myers. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr.N:yers, it is resolved that the minutes of September 26, 1973 be and they hereby are approved. Ayes: 1,ir. Horner, Mr.Myers, Mr. Appers-on and Mr,Krepela. On motion of 11w,Krepela, seconded by hr. Myers, it is resolved that water contract W73-71D, Huguenot Village Shopping Center in the amount of $21,912,50, be and it hereby is approved. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Niyers, i,ir. Apperson and Dir. Krepela. On motion of mr. Myers, seconded by mr. Apperson, it is resolved that Mr. G. 14. Butler, developer of Cameron Hills be given an additional five (5) years on water contract LC-463 due to extenuating circumstances in the development of this subdivision. Ayes: Mr, Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson� ivir.Krepela. Mr. Painter gives a summary of the several discussions with the State Water Control Board on the Bermuda Hundred Industrial area. On motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by lir.Fiyers, it is resolved that the following sewer contracts be and they hereby are approved: S73-58D Huguenot Village Shopping Center $42,535.00 S 73--54D Indian Springs 72,958.25 n n A discussion was held concerning Section "F" (-!f the lonehenge Subdivision, in connect -,-on with the necessity of installing dry sewers. It was generally agreed that this matter would be referred to the Planning Commission with Vir. Painter 's latest recommendation that dry sewers not be installed. The following road has been formally taken into the State Secondary Highway System: Little Creek Lane - From its intersection with 63 State Route 7,_eastwardly 0.11 mile tc Berrybrook Drive 0.11 Mi. On motion of Mr. C"Neill,seconded by Nr.Apperson, it is resolved that the roads in Trojan ?roods be recommended to the State Department of Highways for inclusion into the Secondary System of roads. On motion of r'-r. U'Neill, seconded by i'ir.l�pperson, it is resolved that this Board requests the Highway Department to take the necessary steps to construct immediately Railroad signals at the intersection of the SCL RR crossing at Du.,uy Road and Branders Bridge Road,both of which crossings have been the cause of serious accidents recently. Ayes: Mr. Horner, I,,-r. Myers, iVir. Apperson, Nir.Krepela and Nr.O'Neill. Mr. Doyle, owner of the land fronting on the west side of Rt. 1, across from the Ling King Restaurant, comes before the Board requesting a sewer connection on the line presently being installed to this location. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that six (6) connections be awarded to this property at this time and that a check shouldd be made with the Engineering Department before other connect.`.ons are guaranteed. It is understood that Mr. Doyle will pay for the crossing of Rt.l. Ayes: Mr.Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. On motion of Fir. O'Neill,seconded by i,'r.Krepela, tl-e following ordinance is hereby adopted: AN ORDINANCE to vacate an unimproved twenty-five ( 25 ) foots wide access right-of-way in the subdivision of Greenbriar, Section 2, known and designated as a 25 foot access right-of-waylocated along the eastern boundary line of said subdivision, a plat of which made by E.C.Wilkersonr C.L.S.,Kichmond, Virginia,dated February 27,1963, ME J razord:d June 16, 1965, in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, in Plat Book 14, pages 70 and 71, the said unimproved twenty-five (25) foot wide access right-of-way to be vacated being more particularly shown crosshatched on a copy of said plat dated February 27, 1965, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield C ouuty,Virginia, by resolution duly adopted at its regular meeting held at the Court- house on August 22, 1973, directed that an ordinance be prepated for public hearing on the proposed vacation of the said tvyenty-f ive (25) foot wide access right-of-way in Greenbriar Subdivision,Section 21 known and designated as a twenty-five (25) foot wide access right-of- way, as shown on a plat made by E.O. V4ilkerson, C.L.S.,Richmond, Virginia, dated February 27, 1965,the said access right-of-way to be vacated being shown crosshatched on a copy of the said plat, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference and being more particu- larly described as follows, to -wit: Commencing at its line of intersection, being 25 feet in width, with the southern right-of-way line of Horseshoe Bend Drive extended to a point on the eastern boundary line of Greenbriar Subdivision, Section 2,; thence proceeding southwardly between parallel lines for a distance of 377 feet, more or less, and terminating at its line of intersection with the northern boundary line of White Birch Drive extended and continuing with its line of intersection with the southern right-of-way line of White Birch Drive extended in a southwardly direction between nearly parallel lines for a distance of 197 feet, more or less, and terminating with the northern boundary line of property now or formerly owned by Biggs. WHEREAS, notice of the adoption of this ordinance has been given in accordance with Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 19507 as amended. NOW, THEREFCRE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia: 1. That pursuant to Section 15.1-482, of the Code of Virginia, 1950, ,as amendP3, that the unimproved 25 foot wide access right-of-way as described above and shown crosshatched on the copy of plat attached hereto and described herein, be and it is hereby vacated, except however, the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, Rese.ves to itself two perpetual 16 foot drainage and utility easements upon, over, across, under and through the said access right-of-way, one measures 16 feet being an extension of the easement across south end of Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block E, to the subdivision boundary line, and one measuring 16 feet in width,being an extension of the easement between lots 1 through 7, Block D, to the subdivision boundary line. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accordancc, with Section 15.1-482 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and a certified copy thereof, together with the plat attached, shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia. -3- LM M Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. Nays: Mr. Apperson Mr. Rudy states that the 25-feet vacated right-of-way should revert to the lots in the subdivision. On motion of Mr.Myers, seconded by Mr. O'Neill, it is resolved that the following ordinance be and it hereby is adopted: AN ORDINANCE to vacate an eight (8) foot easement designated on plat of Plymouth Haven, Block A, Bermuda District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, made by Phillip R. Brooks and Kenneth L. Bartoni, Certified Land Surveyors, Richmond, Virginia, dated June 6, 1955, and recorded August 2, 1955, in Plat Book 9, page 62, in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, as extending along the back line of Lots 1 through 9 and the right line of Lot 9 as shown on that plat, to vacate the lines within Block A which divide Block A into nine separate lots; and to constitute Block A as one parcel of land in its entirety without subdivision. WHEREAS, the H&E Corporation has petitioned the Board of Supervisors to vacate a certain eight (8) foot unimproved easement for drainage and utilities shown as lying along the back line of Lots 1 through 9 and the right line of Lot 9, of Block A, Plymouth Haven, a copy of which plat is recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Ehesterf field County, Virginia, in Plat Book 9, page 62; to vacate the dividing lines within Block A and to constitute Block A as one parcel of land in its entirety without subdivision; and to notice that the Board of Supervisors would consider the adoption of an ordinance vacating said easement and constituting Block A as one parcel of land having been given in accordance with Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended! NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia: 1. That pursuant to Section 15.1-482 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the said eight (8) foot easement for drainage and utilities lying along the back line of Lots 1 through 9 and the right line of Lot 9, Block A, Plymouth Haven, Bermuda District Chesterfield County, Virginia, shown on a plat recorded in Plat Book 91 page 62, in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, is hereby vacated, and the dividing lines between Lot 1 and 2, 2 and 3, 3 and 4, 4 and 5, 5 and 6, 6 and 7, 7 and 8,, and 8 and 9 in Block 4 of the aforesaid Plymouth Haven are vacated,and Block A is hereby constituted and designated as one parcel of land without subdivision. This ordinance will be in full force and effect in accordance with Section 15.1-482 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a certified copy -hall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia. Ayes: Mr.Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr.Apperson,Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. -4- On motion of Mr.Krepela, seconded by Mr. Myers, Be it Resolved, by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County that the application of the Knights of Columbus -No. 6189 for permission to conduct Bingo games and/or raffles, having been received by the Board and duly considered, permission is hereby granted said applicant, the Knights of Columbus-No.6189, to conduct Bingo games and/or raffles subject to the conditions as set forth in said permit. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr. Myers, Be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County that the application of the Midlothian Volunteet,Fire Department, for permission to conduct Bingo games and/or raffles, having been received by the Board and duly considered, permission is hereby granted said applicant, the Midlothian Volunteer Fire Department to conduct Bingo g4Lmes and/or raffles subject to the conditions as set forth in said permit. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr.Apperson, it is resolved that a Variance be given to Mr. and "'irs. W.L.Allen to construct a dwelling on Parcel 2, Tax Map 151-49 provided Mr. Chappelle deed3a 25-ft. easement along the eastern property line from the road to the subject parcel for ingress. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. On motion of Mr. O'Neill,seconded by Ivir.Apperson, it is resolved that a Variance be granted to Mr. and Mrs. Steve Leake to construct a dwelling on a one -acre lot fronting on Mayes Road in Matoaca. Ayes: Mr.Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Mr. O'Neill, it is resolved that two (2) Variances be awarded to the Osterbind family for the constructicr o-1' dwell _nas cn �- five ( 5 ) acre tract as recorded on a plat filed with the papers of this Board. which parcel fronts on Salem Church Road, being the property next north of the School Board property. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Appe son, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. Mr. Mason Chalkley comes before the Board to discuss the Communications Study which the County received bids on Sept.611973, and states his recommendations that the bid be awarded to Gautney and Jones Communications in Falls Church, Virginia. After some discussion of this matter, it is on motion of Mr. O'Neill, -seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that this Board awards the contract to Gautney and Jones Communications to study the various departments of the County using radio communication for a price of $ 21, 859.75. -5- M M Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. 735� 094 Mr. Paul Byrne, representing Mason Property Associates comes before the Board requesting the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-2), 65 acres and Townhouses for Sale (R-7),25 acres, two parcels of land of irregular shape, fronting approximately 2800 feet on the north line of Beulah Road (Rt.641), and being located approximately 800 ft. southwest of the intersection of Beulah Road and Hopkins Road (Rt.637) in Dale Magisterial District. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 66-7 (1) parcels 2 and 4 Oheet 22). Mr. Byrne states that if the zoning is allowed as requested there would be an average of 4.2 units per acre with the Townhouse zoning in the middle of the tract and single family residences on all sides. He states that the estimated average of children would be 2.2 in multi -family and 1.3 per single family; that Rountree and Associates have prepared an economic impact study showing there would be a $23.650 gain to the County each year, that the use of the land in such fashion will hurt no one. He presents Mr.Lawrence Mason, who states he has lived in the area for 65 years, wants a good subdivision and most people in the area do not object to this zoning request. Mr. Apperson files with the Board letters from 21 persons in the adjacent area in support of the zoning. Mr. Kelly Miller, Attorney, representing the Fuqua Farms Subdivision, presents a petition signed by numerous people in opposition. He states further that the burden is on the applicant to prove it will not be detrimental to the neighborhood. Mr. Miller states further that the traffic will be too heavy on Hopkins Road, that the density of R-7 is too great, that the Rountree report is vague and wandering, which report could be rebutted if studied and urges the Board to reject this request. Eight people stood in opposition. Mr. David Pearson, who lives across Beulah Road opposes because of traffic problems. Mr. Labor Laurer speaks in opposition. Mr. Apperson presents fourteen (14) letters in opposition. Mr. Byrne states further that he realizes that he has the obligation to prove the merits of this case and points out that 300 houses cam be constructed on this property if all is zoned R-2. He points out further that Mr. Miller could not refute the Rountree report, so it must stand and that the people who live in Fuqua Farms do not have a right to any greater use of the land than the Masons have on their land, and there must be equal rights to all to develop. Mr. Mason states that when Fuqua Farms was developed no one opposed the zoning, although many thought it would crowd the area. He points out that his sister, who owns most of the land, is in extremely bad health and partly blind with no income and needs to sell the land. Mrs. Guthrie, who owns adjacent land states that he has no objection and that Hopkins Road will soon be improved. IM r err' Mr. Miller states that the people in the area are not contesting R-2 zoning but there is too much R-7 zoning in the area at this time. Mrs Apperson states that this is one of the more difficult cases because of friendships in the area and asked the developers to amend their request to R-2 zoning. Mr, Une states that his client will accept R-2 and hold the R-7 reques . Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Mr. Krepela, it is resolved that the area requested to be rezoned R-2 be and it hereby is zoned R-2 and that the area requested for R-7 be and it hereby is withdrawn. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr, Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. 73-5095 Mr. Paul Bergey, representing Diversified Development Inc. comes before the Board requesting the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-2), 110 acres, and to Townhouses for Sale (R-7)2 40 acres, several parcels of land of irregular shape, fronting approximately one-half mile on the southeast line of Salem (hurch Road (Rt.642), extending southeastwardly to a depth of approximately 3000 ft. and being located approximately one-half mile northeast of the intersection of Salem Church Road and Centralia Road (Rt. 145)9 in Dale Magisterial District. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 96-2 (1) parcel 8196-3 (1) parcel and 96-7 (1) parcel 5 (Sheet 31), and states that this case was previously presented in the last meeting and was postponed to allow him to meet with the PTA in the area, and that said PTA voted not to hear him and voted to oppose the zoning request. He cited the fact that the opposition was based mainly on three points: 1. Traffic would be increased on Salem (hunch Road and points out that the Highway Department has scheduled an improvement project on this road which should be started in the near future. 2. The s�Y.cols wbe r. ,arced. He states that single family zoning could give more school children than a combination of multi -family and single family. 3. That there would be severe social problems if the zoning were granted. He states that in the City of Richmond, Chesterfield's R-7 is still a single family residence and that Mr -Tom Fulghum, of the School Board states that he had no knowledge of any social problems emanating from multi -family housing. Mrs. Koogler states that the P.T.A. invited Mr. Byrne to an executive meeting on a day which he could not attend and he -7- could not be heard at the regular meeting of the PTA because of the crowded program. She states "severe social problems" pertain th the concentration of people and that there are many studies currently being made concerning this matter. She states the PTA of the Salem Church School unanimously passed a resolution against the R-7 zoning and further that there would be no sewers in the next five years. Mr. Byrne reiterates the fact that his client could develop the proposal on R-2 zoning and produce more school age children than the current request. He presented Mr. Oakley, owner of the property and six others who reside in the area who do not oppose the rezoningo Mr. Apperson states that R-7 is not a gradual increase in people as is R-2; that the impact is much greater and again asked Mr. Byrne to accept R-2 zoning. Mr. Byrne states that his client will accept R-2 as requested and withdraws the request for R-7o On motion of Mr. Ppperson,seconded by Mr.Myers, it is resolved that the area requested to be zoned R2 be so zoned and the area for R-7 be withdrawn. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill� 735112 Mr. Lloyd C. Journigan comes before the Board requesting the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to General Business (B-3) (7.7 acres) and Light Industrial (M-1) (11.6 acres), several parcels of land of irregular shape, containing 30.7 acres, fronting approximately '1700 ft. on Hull Street Road (Rt.360), extending southeastwardly to a depth of approximately 500 f t. and being located at the inter- section of Hull Street Road and Pocoshock Road in Clover Hill Magisterial District. Refer to tax Map Sec. 40-5 (1) parcels 61 7 and 8 (Sheet 15). Mr. Journigan states that he wishes to build warehouses for rent, that he has an acceptable plan which involves four accesses to Rt.360. Mr. Robert Dol:Dear, representing the YMCA requested a deferment. Mr. Mario Esc-,'-,zL, repr.Pcentiriy the Surreywood Subdivision requested a delay. Mrs. Robert Jenson, from the Longwood Acres Subdivision and Mrs. Terrell from the Pocoshock Woman's Club requested further information concerning this project. On motion of Mr. Horner, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that this matter be delayed to December 127 1973. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. MOM M M 73S115 Mr. Graham Jennings, representing Vivian Earl Pace & Pauline Goodman Pace comes before the Board requesting the rezoning from General Business (B-3) to Heavy Industrial (M-3) of a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 3.41 acres, fronting approximately 309 ft. on Goodes Bridge Road (Rt.1668), extending westwardly to q depth of approximately 500 ft. and being located approximately 1400 ft. north of the intersection of Goodes Bridge Road and 6tlmsley Blvd.(Rt. 647) in Clover Hill Magisterial District. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 40-2 (1) parcel 20-6 (Sheet 15). Mr. Jennings states that his client wishes M-3 zoning but agrees that the restriction on M-3 would prohibit the use of the property. After some consideration of this matter, it is on motion of Mr. Horner, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that this zoning request be and it hereby is denied. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. A pperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. 73S118 Mr. Brewster S. Hill comes before the Board requesting the rezoning from Convenience Business (B-1) to Residential (R-2) of a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 0.67 acres, fronting "PP�oximately 230 ft. on the south line of River Road (Rt.602), and being located approximately 100 ft. weat of the intersection of River Road and Chesterfield Avenue in Matoaca Magisterial District. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 182-9 (1) parcel 3 (Sheet 53/54). There appearing no one in opposition to this request and the Planning Commission having recommended approval, it is resolved on motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Krepela, that the afore - described parcel be and it hereby is rezoned for R-2 purposes, and further that no fee be charged in this case. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Tiro Myers, N:r. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. 73S120 Mt. W. Eugene Glenn, Inc. comes before the Board requesting the rezoning frow ASricul'cu.L al (A; 1:.o General Business ( B-3 ) of a parcel of land of rectan_.3ular shape, containing 1.10 acres, fronting approximately 100 ft. on the south line of Midlothian Turnpike (Rt.60), extending southwardly to a depth of approximately 500 ft., and being located approximately 1600 ft. east of the intersection of Midlothian Turnpike and Research Road in Clover Hill Magisterial District. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 17-10 (1 )parcel 6 Sheet 8). Mr. Glenn states that his client, Mr.Hugh Joyce, who owns an air conditioning business wishes to locate on said parcel and there appearing no one in opposition to this request and the Planning Commission having recommended approval, it is on motion of Mr. Horner, seconded by Mr. Krepela, resolved that the of oredescribed parcel of land be and it hereby is rezoned to General Business (B-3), with the following restrictions: -9- M M That there be a 50-ft. buffer provided along the front property line with no parking allowed in the buffer buffer strip and a plan for landscaping the area be submitted to the Planning Director, which plan would provide for screening the adjacent properties. Ayes: Mr.Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr.Apperson,Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. 73S_ 21 Mr. R.E.Porter, representing Wil-Car Company, Inca, comes before the Board requesting the rezoning from Agricultural (A) and Light Industrial (M-1) to General Industrial (M-2) of two parcels of land of irregular shape, containing 157.75 acres, fronting approximately 3300 ft. on the south line of West Hundred Road (Rt,10), extending southward.ly to a depth of approximarely 2000 ft. and being located approximately 400 ft. east of the intersection of West Hundred Road and Pine Bark Road in Bermuda Magisterial District, Refer to Tax Map Sec. 117-9 (1 ) parcel 5 and 117-10(1) parcel 16 (Sheet 33). Mr. Porter states that the Food Company which intends to locate on this site will have in excess of one million square feet of buildings and will maintain its own roads within the area. Mr. Eli Shelton questions the buffer strip recommended by the Planning Commission. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr, Mye s,seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that the aforedescribed parcel be and it hereby is rezoned to General Industrial (M-2) with the following restrictions: That there be a 100-ft. buffer strip along Rt.10 and a 50-ft. buffer strip along Rt.618 with permission for crossing said buffer strip where necessary, and that trees in the buffer strip on Rt. 618 be left if at all possible. Ayes: Mr.Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson,Mr.Krepela and Mr,0'Nei11. 735123 Mr. Gorge E. Hamlet comes before the�Boardrequesting gSales and Conditional Use Permit to operate aExtinguisher Service from an accessory building on a parcel of land of irregular shape zoned Agricultural (A), containing 6.25 acres, fronting approximately 100 ft, on the east line of Newby's Bridge goad (Rt.651), extending eastwardly to a depth of approximately 500 ft., and being located approximately three -fourths of a mile northeast of the intersection of Newby's Bridge Road and Qualla Road(Rt.653), in Clover Hill Magisterial District. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 63 (1) parcel 16-4 (Sheet 21). Mr.Hamlett states that there is a large building already on the property from which he proposes his operation. There appearing no one in opposition to this request and the Planning Commission having recommended approval, it is on motion -10- r of Mr. Horner, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that a Conditional Use Permit to operate a Fire Extinguisher Sales and Service business be granted on the aforedescribed property with the following re- strictions: 1. The operation of the requested fire edtingui_sher sales and service business shall be restricted and confined to the interior of the largest outbuilding which is located directly behind the existing residence. 2. No outside storage of materials, equipment, or supplies shall be permitted. 3. No sign shall be permitted. 4. The houts of ope ation shall be restricted to bttween 9:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M.Monday through Saturday. No Sunday operation shall be permitted. 5. Any addition or alteration to the existing structure, either directly or indirectly in conjunction with this operation, shall be approved by the Planning Department. 6. This operation shall be subject to the approval of the Chesterfield County Fire Administration and all applicable County and Stat,. laws regulating such an operation shall apply. Approval of the County Fire Administration shall be obtained prior to the commencing df any operation. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. lipperson and Mr. Krepela. 739125 Mrs. Rebecca Wills comes before the Board requlating the right to continue to locate a mobile home at 6507 Walmsley Boulevard, for Mr. Moore who lives in the mobile home. Mr. Moore states that he furnishes transportation for Mrs. Wills and that the rent from this mobile home contributes greatly to the support of Nirs.Wills. On motion of Mr.Horner, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that the Permit be granted to continue the location of a mobile home at this site for a period of two (2) years. Ayes: Mr. Horne , Mr. mr, , Apperson and Mr. Krepela. 73S126 Mr. Wiley K.Wells requests the right to continue the location of a mobile home at 2904 Falling Creek Avenue. Mrs. Adcock, who lives at this location states that Mr. Wells is her brother-in-law and in very ill health and that there is no complaints Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Mr. Krepela, it is resolved that a Permit to continue the location of a mobile home at this location be approved for a period of two (2) years. Ayes: Mr.Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson,&Mr. Krepela. -11- Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. A pperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr. O'Neill,seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that the County Engineer be authorized a7:.d requested to prepare engineering plans for the installation of sewers to connect the Dupuy Elementary School and some 55 homes to the sewer belonging to Colonial Heights at the Charlotte Avenue line. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr.O'Neilliseconded by Mr.Myers, it is resolved that the sum of $17,858.56 be paid to the City df Colonial Heights for costs related to the Planning and Engineering of the sewage pumping station when said Project is completed and service to the County is rendered. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. �4pperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. On motion of Mr. O'Neill,seconded by Ivlr. Krepela it is resolved that that this Board provides from the General Fund 01 the County,sufficient money to pay the monthly costs of water and sewer service of all Rescue Squads in the County. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.0'Neill. On motion of Mr.O'Neill,seconded by Mr.Krepela, it is resolved that a game claim from Frank I. Michalek,Sr.,who resides at 4905 Hickory Road, for the destruction of one (1) 210-lb.hog killed by dogs, be, and it hereby s approved for payment in the amount of $80.00. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr.Krepela, seconded by Mr.Myers, it is resolved that Clarke Dean Pace and Horman John Herndon be appointed as Dog Wardens and Special Police Officers for one (1) year ending October 31, 1974. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. ipperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Mr. O'Neill, it is resolved that the following erroneous tax claims be and they hereby are approved for payment: Nina M.Stewart Elizabeth Lee Overacre Mary K. Walton Thomas E. Jones Lewis R. DePriest William N.Eubank Cyrus Tamadden Russell E. & Marilyn Randall County License $ 5.00 Reruiid Co. license 10.00 Auto License & sticker 5.00 Per. Pro. 1973 Tax 21.08 1973 Per. Pro.Tax 6.12 Trailer Tax 12.50 Per.Pro.Tax 1973 50.61 First Half tax 1973 40.61 Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. -13- n n Mr. Painter advises the Board of problems of obtaining a drainage easement from Mr.A.P.Garrity, the Subdivider of Olde Coach Village. It is agreed that this matter be held for further investigation. On motion of Mr. Horner, seconded by Mr.O'Neill, it is resolved that due to the emergency of continuing the construction of sewer mains in the area, that the following people be offered the states amounts and if found unacceptable that the easements will be condemned by the County: Project S73-43C/28 Larry W. Franklin & Antionette J.Franklin $100. Project S73-43C/30 George F.Booker & Helen M.Booker $ 75. Ayes: Mr, Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepel and Mr.O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr..hpperson, it is resolved that the following streets be so named: Rt.623 - Dry Creek Road Rt.815 - Big Oak Lane Rt.620 - Golf Course Road Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Mr. Krepela, it is resolved that the Engineering Department be authorized to continue the rental agreement for the xerox machine until January 17 1974. Ayes: Nero Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr.Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. Mr. Painter states that C.L.Bookman had installed a water line approximately 240 f t. in length on the north side of Rt.3601 immediately west of Chippenham Parkway and that said water line had been installed in the road right-of-way instead of on an easement secured by the County and it was pointed out that the line waw put in at some extra eft u� t on th-, r c of . aookman, that it was serving the business for which it was installed, that an honest mistake had begin made which was not likely to be harmful to the County. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Apperson the following motion is offered: Be it Resolved that the County accepts the water line installed by Mr.Bookman and pays for same without reservation A vote being taken on the motion: Ayes: Mr. Apperson Abstaining from voting: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Mr. Krepela, it is resolved that roads in the Ravendale and Newberry Towne, Section B, be recommended to the Highway Department for inclusion into the Secondary System. -12- On motion of Mr. A pperson,seconded by Mr.Myers, it is resolved that the operational planfor the Chesterfield County Landfill at Bon Air be, and it hereby is approved, a copy of which Plan is filed with the papers of this Board. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson,Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. On motion of Mr.Krepela, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that the contract between the County of Chesterfield and Carlton, Taylor and Clark, Architects, for drawing plans for the addition to the office building be and it hereby is approved, subject to the approval of the Commonwealth's Attorneys and the County Administrator is authorized to sign said contract. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. There was presented and filed with the papers of this Board an audit of the Appomattox River Water Authority for the year ending June 391973. On motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Mr.0'Neill, it is resolved that the Judge of Circuit Court, the Honorable Ernest P. Gates, be requested to re -appoint the following named Police Officers for four (4) year terms, with the exception of Edwin Thomas Smith, whose term should be limited to six(6� months. Ayes: Mr.Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr,Apperson,Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. William L. Adams J.W.111pplewhite Ralph F�ndolph Arehart Raymond Douglas r,.dkins Duncan Steele Beasley, Jr. John Royce Bucka Gilbert Leonard Bartle Jimmy E. Brown James E. Campbell Mason Tudor Chalkley Tommyj. Cheek Bernard Itanklln C,cward ._, Jr. Edwin Thomas Smith Carlos W. Cunningham Allen Carlton Davis Robert James Doyle William Valvin Driskill James Michael Dudley Thurman E. Estes, Jr. Robert Giles Foster Robert Cecil French Bernard Chester Furman Edward Linwood Gettings Edgar P. Gill Otis Elston Greene L.G.Hamner, Jr. Patrolman ,md Police Officer Police Officer- Sergeant Patrlman & Police Officer Police Officer -Lieutenant Patrolman - Police Officer Patrolman -Police Officer Patrolman -Police Officer Patrolman -Police Officer Patrolman -Police Officer Police Officer -Detective Sgt. Patrolman -Police Officer i _ crolman - Police Officer Police Officer -Captain -Detective Police Officer -Lieutenant Police Officer -Detective Police Officer Police Officer Sergeant Patrolman -Police Officer Patrolman -Police Officer Patrolman -Police Officer Patrolman -Police Officer Police Officer -Detective Police Officer -Sergeant Chief of Police Police Officer Detective Police Officer Sergeant -14- M E5 Charles Warren Hall Hunter Malcolm Herndon James He Johnston, III Charles Ernest Jones John Wesley Layne, Jr. Walter La Lovelady, Jr, Allie V. Maddra, III James Herbert Marable William Edward Martin Thomas Ho Mabe Raymond Leroy Neace, Jr. Linwood Miller Parrish John A. Phillips Terence Phillips Raymond Carter Phillips Joseph Eo Pittman, Jr, RoEoPuckett Charlie E. Richter Herbert MD Shelton Linwood Shenfal Matthews; William Frederick Showalter J.A.Simmons Marvin L. Starnes Earl Lee Stewart John Tolliver Terrell, Jr. Lemerle Cover Trader John Gregory Trueheart Larry Herbert Vaughan Morris Gordon Vaughan Clyde Wayne Ward Douglas Bruce Watson, Jr. Wilber Co Welton Clarence Guy Williams, Jr. Mark Evans Wilson George F. Paul, III Thomas Marshall Gleason James Morrison Rudd James Francis Mitchell Stephen Do Smith Patrolman -Police Officer Patrolman -Police Officer Police Officer -Detective Police Officer -Sergeant Patrolman -Police officer Patrolman -Police Officer Patrolman -Police Off icer Police Officer -Detective Police officer-Capt. of Police Patrol Patrolman -Police officer Patrolman -Police Officer Police Officer -Detective Police Off is-_r-Detective Sergeant Patrolman -Police Officer Police Officer -Lieutenant Police Officer -Lieutenant Patrolman -Police Officer Police Officer -Lieutenant Police Officer Detective Patrolman -Police officer Patrolman -Police Officer Police Officer -Lieutenant Patrolman -Police Officer Patrolman -Police Officer Patrolman -Police Officer Police Officer Pstrolman-Police Officer Patrolm n-Police Officer Patrolman -Police Officer Police Officer Detective Patrolman -Police Officer Police Officer -Lieutenant Patrolman -Police Officer Police Officer Detective Patrolman -Police Officer Patrolman -Police Officer Patrolman -Police Officer Patrolman -Police Officer Patrolman -Police Officer On motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr. Krepela, it is resolved that the following ordinance be introduced for advertising: AN ORDINiNCE to amend and reordain Chapter 59 tirticle XII, of the Cote of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, fiction 5-103, providing for imposition of a license tag on savings and loan associations, AeatDion 5-104, providing for imposition of a license tax on first mortgage loan lenders, Section 5-1059 providing for imposition of a license tax upon other money lenders, and by adding thereto two new sections, Section 5-105,11 providing for imposition of a license tax on small loan companies and Section 5-105,2, providing for imposition of a license tax on other small lenders and purchasers of conditional sales contracts, -15- BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER- FIELD, VIRGINIA: That Chapter 52 Article XII,. Sections 5-1039 5-1047 5-105, and two new sections, Sections 5-105.1 and 5-105.2 be amended and reordained to read as follows: ARTICLE XII -Loan Companies and Bankers Section 5-103- Savings and Loan Associations having its principal office privilege an annual license Every savings and loan association located in the County shall pay for the tax therefor of fifty dollars. Section 5-104. First Mortgage loans Every person conducting or engaged in first mortgage money lending or first mortgage note purchasing occupation, business or trade shall pay for the privilege an annual license tax therefor equal to three hundred dollars and seventy-five hundredths of one per centum of the gross receipts of the businesp in excess of thirty thousand dollars. The term i°gross receipts" as used in this section, shall be deemed to mean the gross interest, gross discount, gross commission or other gross receipts earned by means of, or resulting from, each financial transactions, but the term "gross receipts" shall not include amounts received as payment of principal. Section 5-105. Other money lenders. Every person, except those engaged in first mortgage loans and first mortgage note purchasing, conducting or engaging in any of the following money lending or note purchasing occupations, businesses or trades, namely; an industrial loan company, loan or mortgage company, insurance premium finance company, a factor, a buyer of promissory notes, deed of trust notes or installment loan agreements, shall pay for the privilege an annual license tax therefor equal to five hundred dollars and one per centum of the gross receipts of the business in excess of thirty thousand dollars. The term "gross receipts" as used in this section, shall be deemed to mean the gross interest, gross discount, gross commission or other gross receipts earned by means of or resulting from such financial transactions, but the term "gross receipts" shall not include amounts received as payment of principal. Section 5-105.1. Small loan companies Every person licenses under the Virginia SSmall Loan Law shall pay a license tax equal to five hundred dollars and one per centum of the gross receipts of the business in excess of forty-eight thousand dollars excluding repayments of principal. Section 5-105.2. Other small lenders and purchasers of conditional sales contracts -16- 1*4 w' `4 Every person, other than a person licensed under the Virginia Small Loan Law, engaged in the business of lending money to others for the purchase of motor vehicles, refrigerators, televisions, radios, oil or gas burners, electrical appliances, household furniture or equipment or any other goods or chattels whether new or used, secured by a lien on such goods or chattels, paying the purchase price of any goods or chattels for the buyer and securing the sum so paid by a lien on the same or bythe purchase from a dealer of conditional sales contracts or chattels, mortgages and any other manner or by any other method financing in whole or in part of the purchase of such goods or chattels by or for othersi and every person, other than a person licensed under the Virginia Small Loan Law, engaged in the business of lending money to others securing by lien on such goods or chattels, whether for the purchase thereof or not, shall pay a license tax equal to three hundred dollars and seventy-five hundredths of one per centum of the gross receipts of the business in excess of thirty thousand dollars, excldding repayments of principal. Nothing herein shall require the payment of any license tax under this paragraph by any bank or trust company. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.0,Neille On motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Mr.Myers, the following resolution is adopted: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County desires to retain the firm of Hunton, Williams, Gay & Gibson, Richmond, Virginia, as its bond counsel in connection with the issuance and sale of approximately $1,500,000 Nursing Home Revenue Borrb; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has received a disclosure by Hunton, Williams, Gay & Gibson pursuant to Virginia Code Sections 2.1-349 (a) (2) and (b) (5), being part of the Virginia Conflict of Interests Act, of certain members and associates of such firm, and spouses of members or associates, who serve governmental agencies other than the County; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COITNTY, VIRGTNTTA. 1, Hunton, Williams, Gay & Gibson, Richmond, Virginia, shall be retained as bond counsel in connection with the issuance and sale of approximately $1,500,000 Nursing Home Revenue Bonds, 2, The agreement to retain Hunton, Williams, Gay & Gibson as bond counsel is a contract for legal services which, in the judgment of the Board of Supervisors, in the public interest should not be acquired through competitive bidding, 3. Thks resolution shall be filed as a matter of public record with the minutes of this meeting, Ayes: Mr.Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. tipperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr_O'Neillo -17- % w on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr- O'Neill, it is resolved that application be made for a Grant to the Juvenile Detention Home in the amount of $11,708.18 from the Division of Jus-tice and Crime Prevention to purchase audio-visual equipment, books, etc. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr.Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. On motion of Mr.Apperson,seconded'by Mr.Myers, it is resolved th the report of the Street Light Committee be and it hereby is approved. 3300 Lumen Mercury Vapor.: Merriwood and Route #1 Aldridge Avenue and Route #1 Cobbs Road and State Road Central and Bermuda 7000 Lumen Mercury Vapor Light: Harrowgate and Curtis Street Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr. O'Neill:. There was presented a letter from Mr-M iiis E.Godwin thanking the Board for discussing with him the problems of Chesterfield County, On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr.Myers, it is resolved that M.W.Burnett be again appointed to represent the County of Chesterfield on the Appomattox River Water Authority for a term of four (4) years. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Mr.O'Neill. it is resolved that this Board employ Mr.Dan Robinson and Mr.Robert Fitzgerald to represent the County of Chesterfield in the Fdderal Court action in an effort to obtain a greater amount of the Revenue Sharing funds. Ayes: Mr, Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. On motion of Mr.Apperson,seconded by Mr.Myers, it is resolved that Judge D. Ua Murphey dthe• Cou1nty1ofOCi�esterfbeldand on thethey CODACby are appointed to represent Commission. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. NIyers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr.0'Neill. On motion of Mr. Apperson,seconded by Mr. Krepela, it is resolved that this Board adjourns at 8:10 p.m. to October 15, 1973 at 7:00 P.m• Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr.Krepela and Mr.O'Neill. �Im J i ENGINEERING AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OCTOBER 10, 1973 I. Approval of water contract: W73-71D Huguenot Village Shopping Center $21,912.50 II. Consideration of letter dated September 26,1973 from G. W. Butler concerning grater and sewer service for Cameron Hills Subdivision. III. Review status of water and sewer requirements for Bermuda Hundred area. IV. Approval of sewer contracts: S73-58D Huguenot Village Shopping Center $42,535.00 S73-54D Indian Springs 72,958.25 V. Award of Sewer Contract S73-43C, Beaverpond Branch. VI. Determine policy concerning installation of sewer in Section "F", Stonehenge Subdivision. VII. Request from Stern Realty Corporation for assistance in acquiring drainage and sanitary sewer easements. VIII. Review proposal of September 24, 1973 from Woodward-Invicon, Inc. for Environmental Assessment study of Chesterfield County. IX. Resolution authorizing condemnation proceedings against the following properties: -4Pr01 — --S r2--�C�u---�-Gener and _Development -i. ---Corpo an--_$-2-5. 00 2. Project S73-43C/28 Larry W. Franklin & Antionette J. Franklin, his wife $100.00 3. Project S73-43C/30 George F. Booker & Helen M. Booker, his wife $75.00 X. Street name change: 1. Route 623 to Dry Creek Road (Clover Hill) 2. Route 815 to Big Oak Lane (Midlothian) 3. Portion of Route 620 to Golf Course Road (Bermuda) XI. Request rental agreement fcr xerox machine be extended to r January. 1,. 1974 XII. Miscellaneous Robert A. Painter County Engineer October 5, 1973 n in MACK T. DANIELS CLERK Oliver x Rudy x COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY t11t1Y of Cltrtr�t �,Sr,s�,:•h�f � ti ul W ERNEST P. GATES JUDGE J1jtJ •r'`�� DAVID MEADE WHITE JUDGE CIRCUIT COURT C H ES TERFI ELD, VIRGI N IA October 25, 1973 Mr. Mel Burnett County Administrator Chesterfield County Courthouse Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Re: Road vacation in Greenbriar Subdivision Dear Mel: Attached please find newspaper certification of publication in connection with the above road closing. This ordinance was passed by the Board of Supervisors at its October loth meeting. You will want to preserve this certification with the record of the case. Very truly yours, Morris E. Mason Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney MEM : do f Enclosure Newsojournal, Chesterfield County 9 V a . This is to certify that the attached fished -- . nt - in the Va. on given Swearingen. Realty Co. 1001 BOULEVARD COLONIAL HEIGHTS, VIRGINIA 23834 PHONE 526-0502 Mr. M. W. Burnett Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: 'rr/' — APPRAISERS — — BUILDERS — September 26, 1973 FRED J. SWEARINGEN FRED J. SWEARINGEN, JR. — REALTORS — 1700 E. WASHINGTON STREET PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA 23803 PHONE 732.3705 Enclosed is a copy of letter from the Department of Highways relating to the streets in Trojan Woods Subdivision, Matoaca District. We have completed the necessary requirements for curbs and gutters, tar and graveling of the streets, sewer and water and storm drainageq.as per the enclosed copy of our letter from the Department of Highways. We would like to have the streets in Trojan Woods accepted by the county as soon as possible. Very truly yours, Fred XSwearinge , Jr. Vice -President FJS :bfm Enclosure IUGLAS B. FUGATE. COMMISSIONER )RRILL M. CROWE. RICHMOND, VA. ROY EAKIN, JR., MCLEAN, VA. ,RL A. FITZPATRICK, ROANOKE, VA. IOMAS R. GLASS, LYNCHBURG, VA. :ONARD R. HALL, BRISTOL, VA. )UGLAS G. JANNEY, FREDERICKSBURG, VA. )BERT S. LANDES. STAUNTON, VA. ILLIAM T. ROOS, YORKTOWN, VA. L. R. TREAT, JR. DISTRICT ENGINEER M NwEAi TW OF VIR61 Gory DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS 1221 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, VA. 23219 September 19, 1973 Swearingen Realty Company 1001 Boulevard Colonial Heights, Virginia 23834 Dear Mr. Swearingen: JOHN E. HARWOOD OF PUTY COMMISSIONER K CHIEF ENGINEER W. 5. G. BRITTON. OIHECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION A. K. HUNSBERGER, OIHJCTOR OF ENGINEERING H. GORDON BLUNDON, DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING J. M. WRAY, JR .. DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS OFFILE OF DISTRICT A GINEER PETE7RSBl1RG. T 23803 P. 0. Box 3036 Bon Air, Virginia 23235 Re: Trojan woods Subdivision This is to advise that the base and surface have been checked by the Virginia Department of Highways and found to be satisfactory. Any defects which develop between now and final acceptance will have to be corrected. Very truly yours. E. L. Covington, Jr. Resident Engineer By: R. E. Murray Subdivision Inspector REM/ppw CC: Mr. W. A. prosise, Jr. Mr. J. E. Jackson A HIGHWAY 15 AS :.iAFC W; THI:: US[-R MAKES IT M G. W. Butler 732 Okuma Drive Chester, Virginia 23831 September 26, 1973 Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County Virginia Dear Sirs: I am writing concerning the water contract AC463 for Cameron Hills Subdivision which was dated 1 November, 1967. This contract was given final acceptance by Chesterfield County 18 March, 1969. Since this time there has been a slump in building rendering me unable to incorporate a sewage system within the five-year period stated in this contract. More costly, however, has been the failure of approval for various proposed sewage systems. Approval for a lagoon system of sewage was not granted. Both the Water Control Board and the Pollution Board felt Johnson's Creek was too small to support such a project. In addition, the County itself failed to give sufficient assurance to merit further investigation into a sewage treatment installation. In the latter part of 149, I was told by Mr. Painter that extenuating circumstances have sometimes caused the extension of such water contracts. Of course I realize this decision is strictly in the hands of the Board of Supervisors. However, I feel that I have made not only one, but several valid attempts to install a sewage system, and in each one I have been frustrated (as previously stated). With these setbacks in mind, I sincerely hope this Board of Supervisors will seriously consider granting another five-year period to water contract AC463. This extension should, in all probability, insure the final installment of an approved sewage system. I thank you very much for your time and your consideration in this very important matter. Sincerely, AG.W.0 er GWB:gg cc: Mr. Painter, Engineering Mr. Leo Meyers, Supervisor DOUGLAS B. FUGATE, COMMISSIONER MORRILL M. CROWE, RICHMOND, VA. LE ROY EAKIN, JR., McLEAN, VA. HORACE G. FRALIN, ROANOKE, VA. THOMAS R. GLASS, LYNCHBURG, VA. LEONARD R. HALL, BRISTOL, VA. DOUGLAS G. JANNEY, FREDERICKSBURG, VA. ROBERTS. LANDES, STAUNTON, VA. WILLIAM T. ROOS, YORKTOWN, VA. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS 1221 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, VA. 23219 October 5, 1973 JOHN E. HARWOOD, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER W. S. G. BRITTON, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION A. K. HUNSBERGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING H. GORDON BLUNDON, DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING J. M. WRAY, JR., DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO Secondary System Additions Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Gentlemen: As requested in resolution by your Board on August 8, 1973, the following additions to the Secondary System of Chesterfield County are hereby approved, effective October 5, 1973. ADDITION LENGTH Little Creek Lane - From its intersection with / State Route 637,E Eastwardly 0.11 Mi. to Berrybrook Drive r 0.11 Mi. Copies: Mr. A. S. Mattox Mr. J. P. Mills, Jr. Mr. C. A. Palmer Mr. L. R. Treat, Jr. Mr. L. H. Dawson, Jr. Mr. E. L. Covington - Chesterfield 0 nncerely, J E. Harwood, Deputy Commissioner A HIGHWAY 15 AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT T A K E N O T I C E That the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County will, on Wednesday, 8 August, 1973, beginning at 2:30 P.M., in the County Board Room at Chesterfield Courthouse, Virginia, take under consideration the rezoning and the granting of conditional uses on the parcels of land described herein. Copies of these amendments ^.--e on file in the Planning Department, Room 307, Office Building, Chesterfield Courthouse, Chesterfield, Virginia, for public examination between the hours of 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. of each regular business day. APPLICANT AND/OR AGENT MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARING All persons favoring or opposing the granting of the above requests are invited to appear at the time and place herein stated. 0 • CJ Michael C. Ritz, Director of Planning County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Bd. - August 8, 1973 *73SO74 In Bermuda Magisterial District Day Realty of Richmond, Inc. requests the rezoning from Residential (R-2) to General Business (B-3) of a parcel of land of rectangular shape, containing 5.72 acres, front- ing approximately 700 ft. on Pams Avenue, extending eastwardly to a depth of approximately 400 ft., and being located approximately 200 ft. north of the intersection of Pams Avenue and Willis Road (Rt. 613). Refer to Tax Map Sec. 82-5 (3) lots 10, 11, 11A, 12A, 12B & 12C, Kings - land Heights (Sheet 23). *73SO81 In Matoaca Magisterial District William L. Canada requests the rezoning from Agricultural !A) to Residential (R-2) of a parcel of land of irregular shape, contair:ing 76.20 acres, having no road frontage, but bounded on the north and east by the Wm. L. Canada Plat, and being locat- ed in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of River Road (Rt. 602) and Exter Mill Road (Rt. 636). Refer to Tax Map Sec. 158-12 (1) parcel 37 (Sheet 47). *733082 In Matoaca Magisterial District Custom Investments, Inc. requests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-2) of a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 41.13 acres, fronting approximately 427.92 ft. on Graves Road (Rt. 630), extending northwardly to a depth of approximately 2000 ft., and being located approximately three -fourths (3/4) of a mile southwest of the intersection of Graves Road and Hickory Road (Rt. 628). Refer to Tax Map Sec. 172 (1) parcels 51 & 54 (Sheet 48). 73SO41 In Midlothian Magisterial District Hubbard Investment Company requests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Community Business (B-2) of a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 38.44 acres, fronting approximately 1000 ft. on Old Buckingham Road (Rt. 677) and fronting approximately 550 ft. on Midlothian Pike (Rt. 60) and being located 700 ft. northwest of the intersection of Old Buckingham Road and Huguenot Road (Rt. 147) and 1900 ft. west of the intersection of Midlothian Pike and Huguenot Road. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 16-8 (1) parcels 5-1 and 20 (Sheet 7). 73SO92 In Clover Hill Magisterial District Realty Industries, Inc.. re- quests the rezoning from Residential (R-1) to Residential (R-2) of a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 37.3 acres, fronting approximately 500 ft. on South Courthouse Road (Rt. 653), and being bounded on the east by Forest Acres Subdivision and on the west by Lake Crystal Farms Subdivision. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 27-14 (1) parcel 7, Sheet 8. 73SO93 In Dale Magisterial District G. E. Miles & J. P. Spinner request the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-2) of a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 96 acres, fronting approximately 500 ft. on the west line of Hopkins Road (Rt. 637), and being bounded on the north by the south line of proposed Route 288 and on the south- west by Crooked Branch Creek. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 81-13 (1) parcel 2-1 (Sheet 23). *These cases were deferred by the Board of Supervisors at previous meetings to their August 8, 1973 meeting. Bd. - August 8, 1973 73S096 In Clover Hill Magisterial District Fealty Industries, Inc. re- quests the rezoning from Residential (R-2) to Townhouse For Sale (R-7) part of a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 19.1 acres, located approximately 418 ft. east of Adkins Road and being bounded on the east by Beaver Pond Branch and on the south by the proposed exten- stion of Powhite Parkway. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 27-16 (1) part of par- cel 4 (Sheet 8). 73So99 In Midlothian Magisterial District Woodie Associates requests the rezcning from Agricultural (A) to Community Business (B-2) of a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 1.576 acres, fronting approximately 200 ft. on the north line of Midlothian Turnpike (Rt.60), extending northwardly to a depth of approximately 500 ft., and being located approximately 500 ft. east of the intersection of Midlothian Turnpike and Research Road Refer to Tax Map Sec. 17-9 (1) parcel 3 Sheet 8). 73S100 In Midlothian Magisterial District Raymond L. Berry et al, c./o W.M. Tuck, request the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Community Business (B-2) of a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 1.87 acres, fronting approximately 300 ft. on the north line of Midlothian Turnpike (Rt. 60), extending northwardly to a depth of approximately 400 ft., and being located approximately 800 ft. west of the intersec- tion of Midlothian Turnpike and Robious Road (Rt. 675). Refer to Tax Map Sec. 17-7 (1) parcel 21 (Sheet 8). 73S102 In Bermuda Magisterial District American Alchemy, Inc. requests the rezoning from General Industrial (M-2) to Heavy Industrial (M-3) part of a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 5.85 acres, fronting approximately 460 ft. on the south line of Old Bermuda Hundred Road (Rt. 618), extending southwardly to a depth of approximately 500 ft., and being located approximately 900 ft. east of the intersection of Old Bermuda Hundred Road and Ramblewood Drive (Rt. 617). Refer to Tax Map Sec. 117-14 (1) part of parcel.l (Sheet 33)• 73S103 In Bermuda Magisterial District Kents Enterprises requests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Mobile Home Park (MH-1) several par- cels of land of rectangular,shape, containing 4 acres, fronting approxi- mately 700 ft. on Spring Street (unimproved), also fronting approximate- ly 200 ft. on Sunset Avenue (unimproved), and being located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of the aforementioned unimproved roads. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 116-10 (3) Block C, lots 1 thru 28, Cool Spring (Sheet 32). f Bd. - August 8, 1973 F MOBILE HOMES 773S104 Clover Hill District James Ward Located at 8209 Midlothian Pike. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 18-15 (1), parcel 12 (Sheet 8). 73S105 Clover Hill District Herman E. Morris Located on the east line of Otterdale Road (Rt. 667) approximately 1200 ft. south of its intersection with Genito Road (Rt. 60.4). Refer to Tax Map Sec. 46 (1) parcel 16-1 (Sheet 12). 73S106 3ermuda District Walter L. Gulledge Located at 7811 Pioneer St. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 67-11 (2) Block 20, lots 11-17, Rayon Park (Sheet 23). 73S107 Bermuda District Be.rty E. Martin Located at 4721 Lee St. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 115-6 (6) lots 1 & 2B, NunnallyIs Add. (Sheet 32). n M c"eptember 6, 1973 N'ewc -J ourna I "hesl-er, Virgini.,7�,. 23331 1 David Meade White Y]K-KX.KYIXX Re: Legal Notice of Vacation of 25 foot access right-of-way in Greenbriar Subdivision, MaLoaca District, Chesterfield, Virginia. Gentlemen: �-he 'PLtached le ;al notie in �"our % tie new-, -),7per ciil•�e IE" C, �:Jv '-I'ziledul0c, On GcLooer Following the lasc publication, and prior to the rig to of hearing, please furnish me - cer-k-JficaLe of publication together with your bi.I.I. �Ior t,ame. Thanking you in advance for your ct,:ention to thi,,: request, I am Sincerely, Morris E. Mason fissistant Ccm.-nonwealth's Attorney lkb TAKE NOTICE that on the 1pth day of October, 1973, at 9:00 A. M., or as soon thereafter as may be heard, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, at its regular meeting place in the Board Room of the County Court House at Chesterfield, Virginia, will consider the following ordinance for adoption: AN ORDINANCE to vacate a portion of an unimproved 25 foot access right-of-way in the subdivision of Greenbriar, Section 2, known and designated as a 25 foot access right-of-way, located along the eastern boundry line of said subdivision, a plat of which made by E. o. Wilkerson, C. L. S., Richmond, Virginia, dated February 27, 1965, and recorded June 16, 1965, in the Clerk's office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, in Plat Book 14, pages 70 and 71, said portion of unimproved twenty-five (25) foot access right-of-way to be vacated being more particular':1y shown crosshatched on a copy of said plat, dated February 270 1965, which is attached to the proposed Ordinance and by reference made a part thereof. The complete text of the proposed Ordinance is on file in the office of the Executive Secretary of the Board of Super- visors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, and may be examined by all interested parties between the hours of 9:00 A. M. and 5:00 P. :vi., Monday through Friday. 104) ,�10 \40 —MRANDUM &Y 18o 1973 TO: Mr. Merlin O'Neill, Supervisor, Matoaca District FROM: Mr. Michael C. Rita, Planning SUBJECT: Gr*enbriar Subdivision Section 2,* 25 ft. Right -of -wad" I talked with 'Ar, 0. D. Rudy today and we agreed that the uas of the road for vehicle passage must be eliminated before we vacate the road. If wee vacate the road first our ability to discontinue its use would be somewhat lose. As we discussed on the situ May 160 19T3 t;-iere are several considerations. They are an follows: 1. The County z",ould request the Virginia vepartment of Aighways to sign Route 1122 Heritago Road as a dead-end road. This would be accomplished by orecting; a sign at the Intersection of 1122 and Route 144 indloating that the road ends miles. 2. 5—ie 25 ft. next to Lot 3 or Block 2 shoulbe staked and blocked 11�y the County. 7ho right-of-way should 4180 probably be signed as being "Closed by order by the CN-lest erf it ld County Board of Supervioorv. 3. The Police ;apartment should be requested to monitor the situation in the first evening and morning after the right-of-way teas been staked In order to explain to the citix*ns as they some home from work and as they leave to work, respoctivolys that the use of the road has been 4isoontinued by order of the Board of Super- visors. The mailing, addresses of the two homes which back up to lots 170 160 19 & 20 of block C should be changed to a Horseshoe Bond Drive address and not a Heritage address so that the 25 ft. right-of-way Is not thour,.1*.,t to be a street. I talked to Calvin and he says that this should not be too difficult foktho County to do although it would be of some neonv*nlonae to the two property owners. 5. We should also contact the property owners with whom we visited on May 16 to advise them of our decisions* 6, Mr. Rudy sug q,,gists that we publish an ordinance to discontinue tie use of the road and then adopt the ordinance. Mr. Merlin O'Neill Page 2 May 18, 1973 7. The Police Department, State Highway Department, and the Utility Department (responsible �fbr constructing the signs and posts in the right ,dfhr- way) should be informed to move together on the matter. 8. After the road is discontinuedy for a year or so then the County should consider its vacation. If you agree that any or all of the above should be done, I suggest that you request the Commonwealth's Attorney to prepare and publish the Ordinance to discontinue the use of the road and that the State Highway Department, Police Department and Utilities Department be advised to prepare themselves for the discontinuance of this road. cc: Mr. M. W. Burnett, County Administrator Mr. 0. D. Rudy, Commonwealth's Attorney Mr. R. A. Painter, County Engineer Colonel E. P. Gill, Chief of Police MAY 197 ED gEC�7 V�� 8L9 7r� News -Journal, Chesterfield County, Va . This is to certify that the attached ��,� was published in the NEWS -JOURNAL, a newspaper published in Chester, Va. on The_ st s tion being q 29— 7 3 /-- given 3 TAKE NOTICE that on th day of October. 1973# �f 9 a.m.,OP#s soon thereafa$_. ,a may be beard. th% Count; fold Virginia.. $' Supary m of the Cuun ular n ace in house rfie 11 conaiderthg ord a[{ ado v faitnitrspinoived i lit AN CE for dt_ nd usdvision;of Plymouth yak itrie Vf _Lots 1 Have " _ righ g� to vacate the linos iittiti Bloc 9sepatate lots; w anti to constit ' ,eI of land In its ens y Q Haven was without Cer't- m � lipr��^�� , arson, if red tune 6; +c Circuit _ tat Book 9, posed Or page 62, a co tettgpro dinance and by reference m e a P r� of. . The complete text of the proposed Ordinance is on file Sup - in the Office of. the Executive Secretary of the Board of Sup ervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.. and may be ex- a;nined by all interested parties between the hours of 9:00 Monday rhrouo a, m. wind 5;4U<p; ..; i► Friday,,, Robert C. Markham Attorney at Law Chester. Virginia AN ORDINW9 to vacate an eight (8) foot easement designated on plat of Plymouth Haven, Block A, Bermuda District& Chesterfield County, Virginia, made by Phillip H. Brooks and Kenneth L. Barton, Certified Land Surveyors, Richmond, Virginia, dated June 6, 1953, and recorded August 2, 1935, in Plat Book 9, page 626 in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chester- field County, Virginia, as extending along the back line of Lots 1 through 9 and the right line of Lot 9 as shown on that plat; to vacate the lines within Block A which divide Block A into nine separate lots; and to constitute Block A as one parcel of land in its entirety without subdivision. WHEREAS, The H & E Corporation has petitioned the Board of Super- visors to vacate a certain eight (8) foot unimproved easement for drainage and utilities shown as lying +clang the back line of Lots 1 through 9 and the right line of Lot 9, of Block A. Plymouth Haven, a copy of which plat is recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, in Plat Book 98 page 62; to vacate the dividing lines within Block A and to constitute Block A as one parcel of land in its entirety without sub- division; and notice that the Board of Supervisors would consider the adoption of an ordinance vacating said easement and constituting Block A as one parcel of land having been given in accordance with Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; NOW, THER86►OU, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia: 1. That pursuant to Section 13.1-482 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the said eight (8) foot easement for drainage and utilities lying along the back line of Lots 1 through 9 and the'right line of Lot 9, Block A, Plymouth Haven, Bermuda District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, shown on a plat recorded in Plat Book 9, page 62, in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, is hereby vacated, and the dividing lines between Lots 1 and 29 2 and 30 3 and 49 4 and 50 5 and 60 6 and 7, 7 and 8, and 8 and 9 in Block A, of the aforesaid Plymouth Haven are vacated, and Block A is hereby constituted and designated as one parcel of land without subdivision. This ordinance will be in full force and offset in accordance with Section 15.1-482 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a certified copy shall be recorded in the Clerk's office of the Circuit Court of Chester County, Virginia. Em M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield, Virginia ♦ 24 d R M P E T I T I O N TO: The Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County, Virginia Re: Vacation of the 8 foot unimproved easement for drainage and utilitie in the subdivision of Plymouth Haven, Block A, running along the back line of Lots 1 through 9 and the right line of Lot 9; to vacate the lines within Block A which divide Block A into 9 separate lots; and to constitute Block A as one parcel of land in its entirety without subdivision. A plat of Plymouth Haven was made by Phillip H. Brooks and Kenneth L. Barton, Certified Land Surveyors Richmond, Virginia, dated June 6, 1955, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, in Plat Book 9, page 62, a copy of which is attached to the proposed Ordinance. Your petitioner, The H & E Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Virginia and licensed to do business therein, by its President, Albert A. Elliott, respectfully represents as follows: 1. That the corporation is the owner of Lots 1 through 9, Block A, Plymouth Haven, Bermuda Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown on a Plat recorded in Plat Book 9, page 62. 2. That the petitioner desires that the 8 foot unimproved easement for drainage and utilities lying along the back line of Lots 1 through 9, and along the right line of Lot 9, previously granted by a former owner of the land to the County of Chesterfield, be vacated. 3. That the petitioner desires the lines which divide Block A into nine separate lots be vacated and abandoned, and that Block A be constituted and designated as one parcel of land without subdivision. 4. That the Engineering Department of Chesterfield County, Virginia has been consulted, and it has no objection from an engineering standpoint to vacating the aforesaid easement and the dividing lines of Block A. WHEREFORE, your petitioner prays that the Board of Supervisors will ladopt the Ordinance attached hereto in order that the aforesaid easement and dividing lines may be abandoned and vacated in accordance with Section 15.1-482, lCode of Virginia, 1950, as amended. THE H & E CORPORATION President Robert C. Markham Attorney at Law Chester. Virginia In 0 TO: The Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County, Virginia Re: Vacation of the 8 foot unimproved easement for drainage and utilitie in the subdivision of Plymouth Haven, Block A, running along the back line of Lots 1 through 9 and the right line of Lot 9; to vacate the lines within Block A which divide Block A into 9 separate lots; and to constitute Block A as one parcel of land in its entirety without subdivision. A plat of Plymouth Haven was made by Phillip H. Brooks and Kouneth L. Barton, Certified Land Surveyors Richmond, Virggista, dated June 6, 1955, and recorded in the Clark's Office of the Ciarcult Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, in Plat Book 90 page 62, a copy of which is attached to the proposed Ordinance. Your petitioner, The H & E Corporation, a corporation organised junder the laws of this State of Virginia and licensed to do business therein, lby its President, Albert A. Biliott, respectfully represents as follows: 1. That the corporation is the owner of Lots 1 through 90 Block A, Plymouth Haven, Bermuda Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown on a Plat recorded in Plat Book 9, page 62. 2. That the petitioner desires that the 8 foot unimproved easement for drainage and utilities lying along the back line of Lots I through 9, and along the right line of Lot 9 previously granted by a former owner of the land to the County of Chesterfield, be vacated. 3. That the petitioner desires the lines which divide Block A into Inins separate lots be vacated and abandoned, and that Block A be constituted Viand designated as one parcel of land without subdivision. 4. That the Raginsering Department of Chesterfield County, Virginia 1has been consulted, and it has no abjection from an engineering standpoint to vacating the aforesaid essemewt and the dividing lines of Block A. WHSRSFORX, your petitioner prays that the Board of Supervisors will adopt the Ordinance attached hereto in order that the aforesaid easement and dividing lines may be abandoned and vacated in accordance with Section 15.1-4828 jCods of Virginia, 1950, as amewded. THE H & E CORPORATION By President Robert C. Markham Attorney at Law Chester, Virginia LIM 15 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IRVIN G. HORNER, CHAIRMAN CLOVER HILL DISTRICT LEO MYERS, VICE CHAIRMAN BERMUDA DISTRICT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS J. RUFFIN APPERSON DALE DISTRICT ALDRICH J. KREPELA MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT E. MERLIN O'NEILL, SR. MATOACA DISTRICT C O U N T Y O F C H E S T E R F I E L D CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA ROBERT-A. PAINTER. COUNTY ENGINEER M. W. BURNETT ENGINEERING AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENT EXECUTIVE SECRETARY August 31, 1973 Mr. Robert C. Markham P. 0. Box 716 Chester, Virginia 23831 Dear Mr. Markham: Re: Plymouth Haven -Block A This is to advise that the Engineering Department has checked the easements along Block A of Plymouth Haven and we have no objection to this easement being vacated. Very truly yours, David H. Welchons Assistant County Engineer DHW/jss cc: Mr. R. A. Painter Mr. W. A. Prosise, Jr. R 9 APPLICATION FOR BINGO AND/OR RAFFLE PERMIT The undersigned applicant, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.1-316 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, hereby petitions the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County for a one-year permit to conduct Bingo games and/or raffles. 1. The applicant, in support of this petition, says that it is a proper organization to conduct such Bingo games and/or raffles because (state here the kind of organization requesting said permit) Knights of Columbus Bishop Peter L. Ireton Council, No. 6189 2. An authenticated copy of a resolution of the Board of Directors or other governing body of said organization requesting said permit is attached hereto, together with supporting evidence that said organization is an organization permitted to conduct said Bingo games and/or raffles under Section 18.1-316 of the 1950 Cods of Virginia, as amended. 3. The applicant further states that it has read all of the conditions which will be a part of said permit and agrees to comply therewith. STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY of CHESTERFIELD, to -wit: APPLI NT By Thomas A. Rockeeharlie, Jr. Grand Knight .#61g9 Subscribed and sworn to before me this �� day of 15)�T• , My commission expires: MY Corr' -M rYp�res February 16, 197` Notar u i air 4 OCT 1973 RECEIVED s" iQ BOLD f� HHESTE ( �� i o, Knights of Columbus BISHOP PETER L. IRETON COUNCIL, No. 6189 Meetings 2nd Sunday P. O. Box 9007 Sacred Heart and Richmond, Virginia 23225 4th Sunday St. Edwards of each month RESOLUTION Be it resolved that the Trustees of Knights of Columbus Council No. 6189 request the Grand Knight of Council No. 6189 to petition the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County for a permit to conduct BINGO in Chesterfield County. TRUSTEES: r M 9 APPLICATION FOR BINGO AND/OR RAFFLE PERMIT The undersigned applicant, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.1-316 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, hereby petitions the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County for a one-year permit to conduct Bingo games and/or raffles. 1. The applicant, in support of this petition, says that it is a proper organization to conduct such Bingo games and/or raffles because (state here the kind of organization requesting said permit) Chesterfield Volunteer Fire Department No. 5 (Midlothian Volunteer Fire Department) 2. An authenticated copy of a resolution of the Board of Directors or other governing body of said organization requesting said permit is attached hereto, together with supporting evidence that said organization is an organization permitted to conduct said Bingo games and/or raffles under Section 18.1-316 of the 19SO Code of Virginia, as amended. 3. The applicant further states that it has read all of the conditions which will be a part of said permit and agrees to comply therewith. APPLICANT STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY of CHESTERFIELD, to -wit: Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14th day of September 197 3 My commission expires: 9/30/76 Notary Pu lic R MEMORANDUM DATE: October 4, 1913 TO: Mr. M. W. Burnett, County Administrator FROM: Michael C. Ritz, Director of Planning SUBJECT: Variance for Mr. & Mrs. W. L. Allen on a Portion of Parcel 2, Tax Map Section 151-4 (1) In Bermuda Magisterial District, Mr. & Mrs. W. L. Allen request a variance for construction of a dwelling on a division of land with no road frontage. The property is presently owned by Mr. E. L. Chappell of 1809 Point of Rocks Road. The property is intended to be deeded to the Allens subject to approval of the variance. The portion of property under consideration is approxi- mately six hundred feet from Point of Rocks Road. It will have approximately one half acre area. The Health Department has indicated that the site.is suitable for well and septic tank facilities. Mr. Chappell has expressed a desire to provide access across his property from an existing driveway. Staff recommends that Mr. Chappell deed a twenty-five foot easement along the eastern property line of the length of Parcel 2 from the road to the portion of the subject parcel, should the Board approve the variance. oil 3 O D � O m UI A n a N �1 U 4 =a _ N » N a v lil f' I I a i 0 0 a o JO a H 0 �• r a d R b +p J V • ---------------- ------------------ (� v • • r �I I IIII a r I J f It 7 4 6'L 4t 1 � m Z Y -C jL �I KC is ,r k� j S -rev Ly` LffA CC.- Sso, DOA q7 MA T-o4c t$ V14A ( /-�N��_ ec: ril?, a'NC-t Ll- Mr. & Mrs. Steve Leake P.O. Box 47 Matoaca, Va. 23803 Melvin Burnette Executive Secretary Chesterfield County for consideratidn of Board of Supervisors at next meeting, Oct. 10,1973 Dear Sirs: InMatoaca Magisterial District Mr. & Mrs. Steve Leake request a variance to build a dwelling unit on.a portion of a parcel of land with private road frontage. This property is located. on the right side of a private road extending from.Wells-Steet in Matoaca and is presently owned by Mary V. Mayes and Mary M. Lyon, of which.a one acre lot will be deeded to us. Neither public sewer nor public water isavailable. Howeverp the Health Department has:been.contacte&to advise the suitability for septic tank and well. Since Farmer's Home Administration has advised approval of our loan your contderation in this variance request will be greatly appreciated. Very truly yours, 44AA- Steve Leake del cc: E. Merlin O'Neillg Supervisor Matoaca District I Nod 7' A O i D 3 x ; s o s v Z A c u rn / O r C 3 // M•/9 of o < 437,3 i o s: I -4 O O Z f= l - r e : A A N m m 2 0 3 S rn c s �0 z O A O �1 N o z rn / s H 0 A' O / S•/90 33, z a W. A rn A .< n / q3j 0/' y S N • — a < • � y � s / Z• O S A Z a` e4 N 0 n / N'/9e co,; •/33 •tO / / E. 2 : h "� _ N 4 ? O An-0 mammy y co G , i o� O O o a do ti o M~ � 1/ S•/yea / bq.3W 36, /. S 4G o y a to y 3g o4 0 / 3 rn 0 0 0 • .. a j n] N. 38�92 33 E � fa m a n C ^► ` = Map North 873 m J s.02e09'w., 30e.00' C. As STATE RTE . NO. 626 u � � c G 'o ►-i Z ?> ( O G C z C) CD J i tzi t7 Cn U 'U � H o y �+ �. 1 �+ ; P, H. M d- Z O r3 H ( cD o � H a' �'• c� �. H• :j xj � oa [r H p,, sN N• s� n { �-+, rr O !1 `C �. �• as ~• � v rn CD 1 (a CD C+ CD "CS fta N H a cc N w f4' n A) rj � iv P � Vl `�' r7 Z rh .'�. to v v N O ti-+• r+ rt �:f M `C M P W 0 O 0 rr �. N. O hh .r'.toU ►h W. W am F. Cumming TrT Old Springhouse Read n, Virgini,a221.01�73 ;tnd C. Dart,irst Field Road cn n hersburg, MarylandN�:,207bQ an E,. Hurst, Jr. V/P 0 com, Inc.a Franconia RoadCk - o andria Va. 22310 ' arl T. Jones, Exc. V/P c 0.U, o r, c. i autney & Jones Communca,ns 22 Telstar t �allsChurch, Virginia. 2g;O- t` r. Peter M. Kelly, Pres. 'elly Scientific Corporation 1 900 Wisconsin Ave., N.W. Z ashing'on,. D. C. 20016 adio Engineering & Sales Co. r � i r. -' 20Z W. Cary Street ichmond, Virginia 2322t Miguel T. Sanchez, V/P stech Corporation` dd Professional Building. voerverna O ( I Park, Maryland 2114( diit � � � f r Feleconsult, Inc. Co w �.s. 12814 Pennsylvania Ave.,. N.tiY. {,11ashington, D. C. 2.0007 j w L- 1 H ��j a b z 1 M r'iy < ' i o z y H o rn H y c a z d o y -' > z 0 c o C r+ r+ o t7 w �• a r. rt cD � o cn cat G °, can sv cD ca a W C cn � t5 ¢,Yq lD ::sf CA U 1 1 /WV V -E4 W W William F. Cumming 600 Old Springhouse Road 4cLean, Virginia 22101 Oland C. Durt, III 1 First Field Road U aithershurg, Maryland C 20760 erman E. Hurst, Jr. V/P ? r,, o mnicom, Inc. 11S Franconia Road ° CN G lexandria, Va. 22310 arl T. Jones, Exc. P c s J -Z autney & Jones Communicaj 922 Telstar Port alls Church, Virginia 2� r. Peter M. Kelly, Pres.( 'elly Scientific Corporat: 900 Wisconsin Ave., N.W. dashington, D. C. 20016 adio Engineering & Sales 'Ic c Z 202 W. Cary Street ichmond, Virginia 2322 r, fly:::yr;► 4iguel T. Sanchez, L ystech Corporation' ti ` ` odd Professional Bui ldin: +'� erverna Park, Maryland -0 Teleconsult, Inc. 2814 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington, D. C. 20001 I i I m COLONEL E. P. GILL CNi EF OF POLICE C 0 U N TY ,••t�Z"7-I w+ A lat' �`• E. T. SMITH CAPTAIN OF D'cT EC tIY ES W. E. MARTIN CAPTAIN OF POLICE 1 I i t 1 1I q I - lei $j y�rp CHESTE_-RFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA POLICE D EPARTM ENT October 3; 1973 Mir. Jack f'anuel Assistant county Administrator Chesterfield County, Virginia Re: Communication Study Proposal by Gautney & Jones Dear Jack: You will note that S7 2r)0. 5 of the total $21 ,8�9.7 as submitted in�the bid of Ga,rtney ?� Jones is for the pol i re department art of the total study. y. I have been advised ti?at the police department cost may be`und?d on a federal grant and if this were funded, the tedp nm,-nt r!ouId }gay2 5360.04 and oar cent _0-_5,_$0.77 with the S atP �a., T I P r cent or , _ 1 , t r I tv paying ng f'y. p"r curt or 5360.0� • i n other 'lords the (n _ terf,i eu �o.In l -� n c"n ( Cost of all r.el!nt"t S,ill h,�, to pay a to'a1 cas'I o.utl,�v of $1 �,558.. �ieo,arer;t, less tfle police 71 CIS Zrrl !1 %five per cent o r �7 ,7.00.85�' for grand toil yof $1 ,,018.°?. this tot-1 nro �sa1 I.til1 afford Qn. r7`.%,ll �y t}i'c' 3D�r of ��rnr�JjSOr S, Of ! p I 1 r1Q^oly 1;.!i th the Co�-!ny. + ,rch, t-it on the Consul .tant the op ortijni tv t.0 t'or:; �- the proposed di-tion. J Respect-I+11iy2 ,1 tjl�a $qt. ''!�5r)t T. Cf31'.1'v $^,•? l d� !�� 5i gt?71`. C.t? l,h? ?f ) P01 i Ce t V COLONEL E. P. GILL CHIEF OF POLICE In E. T. SMITH CAPTAIN OF DETECTIVES W. E. MARTIN CAPTAIN OF POLICE C O U N T Y O F C H E S T E R F I E L D CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA POLICE D EPARTM ENT September 18, 1973 Summary of Proposal SYSTECH Bid rIo. 73-269-2239 ^tote: Phone call from Mr. Sanchez on 9/11, indicated that they have already formed an opinion as to what we need and further indicated to me that they had just como- � ,,I,- ,. -, :.,,Aimp,,A �rmltl IP this. This is the impress. c._on I got from the conversation. In Figue I Page 2 the graph shows two more weeks existing between the 10 weeks mark and the start of the Dwell Time yet on page 5 of Chesterfield's bid form Systech states Part One completion date is 10 weeks and then onPage 1 of the proposal under heading General Work Statement and Management proposal, Section 2, they indicated Part 1 will be completed in twelve weeks. This still seems too inconsistant with Section 2 of Part 1 on Page 3 when the final report will be delivered. Section 1 of Part 1, page 3 indicates they will do the work and then consult with the people instead of vice versa. Section 2, Project Support, Part 1, Page 3 indicates we must furnish an awful lot of data for them plus we must furnish transportation etc. Invoice Section may not correspond with the County timetable. Part 2, Page 3, S kti on 3- How is this possible in two weeks when six weeks is alloted for this phase? Don't agree with them administering 'r, 3idder's Briefing. Part 2, Section 4, Page 3- What are they doing between the tvio weeks in Sec. 3 and the six weeks in this Section 4. Don't agree I,rith negotiation meeting administered by Systech. T* would seem from Section B, Part 2, Page 4 (Invoice) that the major emphasis of part 2, of the Study 4rill be procure equipment etc., therefore the main part of the consulting effort will be done in the first 10 weeks. Page 8, following Item 13, the sentence indicates that they plan to use a prepared �pide or question -interview -guide to gather information and we must furnish someone to accompany them on each of these as indicated further in the explanation of the guide on Page 9. M M September 18, 1973 Page,-2- Evident from statement on Page 20, first paragraph, with reference to competition Performance in 1/3 of the time for 1/3 of the cost, that SYSTECH isn't really up on .,,hat is going and the cost involved etc., especially in light of Systech-'s bid. In the sample contract supplied in the back of the book, Section III proposes an advisory committee be set up consisting of only three members. I do not believe this is practical or realistic in light of our situation here in the county. Question the validy of Section V (Potents) in the contract. Since the county pays the bill, this raises question in my mind. Question Section 7711 of the contract, where we agree not to use any of the information obtained from the project as evidence in any lavisuit etc. against Systech. Even With the additional provisions added I believe this should be re -written. The whole contract, I believe, should be revfe r2.`l and re -written by our Commonwealth Attorney, if this Company were selected. Sub, i tted by, cr�.�f.`,r, ,hal kley Detective Sergeant Special Assistant to the Chief of Police 129 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IRVIN G. HORNER, CHAIRMAN CLOVER HILL DISTRICT LED MY€RS, VICE CHAIRMAN BERMUDA DISTRICT n BOARD OF SUPERVISORS J. RUFFIN APPERSON DALE DISTRICT ALDRICH J. KREPELA MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT E. MERLIN UNEILL, SR. M ATOACA DISTRICT C:0 U 'i TY O F V H E S T E R F I E L D CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA M. W. BURNETT EXECUTIVE SECRETARY October 5, 1973 Mr. C.G. Manuel Assistant County Administrator County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Manuel, Re: Pending Communications Study I followed the work leading up to the present bid for the entire County communications study since its con- ception and worked rather closely with Detective Sgt. Mason Chalkley when representative of the Communications firm visited the County and took a look at our present overall communications system. From the Fire Department's point of view, I think a total communications study is necessary at this time to bring the Fire Department communications in line with the amount of work that passes through our present. Fire Alarm Headquarters which would include not only radio traffic but vocal alarm transmission and normal telephone communications. I attended the bid opening and later reviewed to the best of my ability the proposals submitted by: 1. Gautney and Jones Communications, Inc. of Falls Church, Virginia 2. Omnicon, Inc. of Alexandria, Virginia I believe these are the only two consulting firms capable of making a study at a reasonable price which bid in Chesterfield County. Page 2 Also, please permit me to express my feelings as Coordinator of Civil Defense in Chesterfield County, the last two floods have certainly pointed out that we have a major deficiency in communicating with the various County departments during an emergency situation. Hopefully, after the communications study, some type of inter -departmental communications system could be established which will increase greatly our capabilities in time of emergency whether they be natural or manmade. If any additional information is needed from me in reference to the communications study, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Robe L. Re Chief of Department CHESTERFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT RLE : j rb CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 24 day of October 1973, between THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, as party of the First part (hereinafter called the Owner), and Gautney and .Tones. Communications, Inc. as party of the second part (hereinafter called the Contractor). WITNESSETH: In consideration for the mutual covenants hereinafter stated, the parties agree for themselves, their personal representatives, successors, assigns, as follows: 1. The Contractor promises and agrees: A. To furnish all materials, equipment, tools, skill, and labor of _very description necessary or reasonable incidental to carrying forth and �:.ompleting in a good, firm substantial and workmanlike manner, in strict conformity with the true intent of the Plans and Specifications entitled Communications Survey ,repared by the County of Chesterfield, Chesterfield, Virginia, which, with the Notice to Bidders, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Specifications and :'uppleinental Specifications are hereby made a part hereof as fully and to _'ie same effect as though they had been set forth at length herein. B. To commence work under this contract not later than ten (10) ays following the date to be specified in the written "Notice to Proceed' ,y the Owner, and to fully complete all word; hereunder within one hundred and venty-six ( 126 ) calendar days from and including said date. C. If the said work is not completed within the time limit above sated, time specifically being of the essence, the Contractor shall be -able, and hereby agrees to pay the Owner as liquidated damages and not as penalty, the sum of Twenty Dollars ($20.00) per calendar day for each and •v,ery day that the said work remains incomplete after the expiration of the r.ntract time for completion; the said sum or sums to be deducted from, o,iies due or to become due the Contractor under this Contract. 2. Tlie Owner promises and agrees: A. To pay thy: Contractor f.or said wort; as specified within the '), ScI 'n accordance with the provisions of those Contract Do,ume-ts, rite n'Lr act Sum, as set forth in said Proposal aCi:)unting to T4i2-t ItE'-O ile thousand ,ht hundred and fifty-nine and 75/1.00 Dollars (�2t,fi ';.15),f subject to r itionS and deductions provl.ded theroin, for thy' aut(lor--[,zed lete place and accepted by the County or its auttior:i_ced representatives. Lit)J-C UJj'OLo ;t_> sIia-11 be [Wade to the Co 7,Lrac.tor as t[1e W0171•: p,r ;rE'SS'S ?t cnd of eac'! phr _>_. of the study. 3. It is further understood and agreed b^tween the parties hereto as :�l log•: s . A. The said work is to be done .in accordance with the laws of the Late of Virginia to the entire satisfaction of the Otaner, subject at all mes to the inspection and approval of the Owner. B. The decision of said County upon any question connected with he execution of this agreement or any failure or delay in the prosecution the work by said Contractor shall be final and conclusive, C. If at any time after the execution of this Contract and the '-:rformance Bond, the Owner shall deem the Surety or Sureties then upon bond to be unsatisfactory, or if for any reason said bond shall cease .-o be adequate security for the performance of the work, the Contractor, :hall, at his expense, within five (5) days after receipt of written notice '_o do so, furnish an additional bond or bonds in such form and amount and pith such surety or sureties as shall be satisfactory to the Owner. In such event no further payment to the Contractor shall be deemed to be due nder this Contract until such new or additional security for the faithful rformance of the work shall be furnished in manner and form satisfactory :o the Owner. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said parties have hereunto set their hands and _,nixed their seals, the day and year first above written. 7`TEST . . 'f E S `i: SIGNED, SEALED AND EXECUTED FOR TITLE Chairman, Board of Supervisors SIGNED, SEALED AND EXECUTED FOR THE CONTRACTOR BY TITLE Executive Vice President Gautney & Jones, as the Contractor, accepts the conditions of liquidated damages of 'aragrap'n l.C. provided such delays in performing the work are caused by.the Contractor. In heir bi-weekly report to the Owner, the Contractor will document any delays considered to be aused by other than the Contractor, and will request a corresponding extension in contract i.me for completion. Owner tractor Fidelity�..ind Deposit Company HOI11E OFFICE OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE, MD. 21203 CONTRACT NI) ;�8 I62 �92 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: G_zt_�-trey &; Jones Cod�znvanicatio-is Ilzc. That------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------?--- --------------------------------------------- --------------------- 2922 Telstar Court, =Fall-s Churck�� `� r�;-� � U �2�}42... - (hereinafter called Principal), as Principal, and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a corporation of the State of Maryland, with its Horne Office in the City of Baltimore, Maryland, and duly authorized and licensed to do business in the State of .... T ar' land ...... .----- (hereinafter called Surety), as Surety, ------------ --- -- are held and firmly bound unto----_`T ''___Ci_a? ljty---!:f__Ck f'k_t_-3zf�.w'! G __ �xl _� z'l'� p�.�9-------------------- -----_--- -'-�'��----'_ _-_.___-_______.(hereinafter called Owner), in the full and just sum of ------------------------------------------------ `r'-tti a-y-�V------ -------�t1Q119--?7 -- ------ -HUn it cl__. Z ^'ai ,1l@ �-- 75AIDollars ($__r2..d sot-59_-_7.5_---•), to the payment of which sum, well and truly to be made, the Principal and Surety bind themselves, their and each of their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Signed, sealed and dated this'-�----h--------------------------------------day of-- ------------------------19.73..... WHEREAS, the Principal has entered into a certain written agreement, dated the____ 2��t�'_...______ day of.__.____Qgtobuk'______________19-73__., with the Owner for__Ub;^ _inicatJons_ StLY'�Fe----_-_-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ------------------------------------------------- which agreement is or may be attached hereto for reference. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That, if the Principal shall well and truly perform and carry out the covenants, terms and conditions of said agreement, then this obligation to be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. WITNESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------(SEAL) ---------- ---------------------- ----------- --------------- - ------------- (IF INDIVIDUAL OR FIRM) ATTES.T•: (,Jr CORPORATION) r� ATTEST: FIDELITY AND - - --- - ---- - --- -- - - ---- -1-.: fit .r C329-121 M. 8-68 1801 W ------------------------------------------------------------------------------(SEAL) ----------------- ----------- ------- ------------(SEAL) Gj +C, ! ,dE7 t>: JOYES ,C Oi,.,f r;7IC `T'I011 S s I11C . -- ;--�1 r __L� (SEAL) I DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND Power or Attorney FIDELITY ANI!Pe DEPOSIT COMPANY O fViARYLAND HOME OFFICEi BALTIMORE, MD. IiNOw Am, IMEN BY THESE. PRESENTS: That the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a corpora- tion of the State of Maryland, by PAUL J. PLUNKETT , Vice -President, and F. R. NACLE , Assistant Secretary, in pursuance of authority granted by Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of said Com- pany, which reads as follows: "The President, or any one of the Executive Vice -Presidents, or any one of the additional Vice -Presidents specially authorized so to do by the Board of Directors or by the Executive Committee, shall have power, by and with the concurrence of the Sec- retary or any one of the Assistant Secretaries, to appoint Resident Vice -Presidents, Resident Assistant Secretaries and Attorneys - in -Fact as the business of the Company may require, or to authorize any person or persons to execute on behalf of the Company any bonds, undertakings, recognizances, stipulations, policies, contracts, agreements, deeds, and releases and assignments of judgments, decrees, mortgages and instruments in the nature of mortgages, and also all other instruments and documents which the business of the Company may require, and to affix the seal of the Company thereto." does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint Joseph L. Burke, Karl L. Johnston, Russell Ford and Lee E. Hanna, all of washington, D.C., EACH,..,. . its true and 1awlulagent and Attorney -in -Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver, for, and on its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed: any and all bonds and undertakings, , , o o n t e execution of such bonds or undertakings in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon said Company, as fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its office in Baltimore, Md., in their own proper persons. This power of attorney revokes those issued on behalf. of Joseph L. Burke, etal, dated May 4, 1972 and on behalf of Alta B. Carlson and Lee E. Hanna, dated May 2, 1972. The said Assistant Secretary does hereby certify that the aforegoing is a true copy of Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of said Company, and is now in force. IN WITNESS WIIEREOF, the said Vice -President and Assistant Secretary have hereunto subscribed their names and affixed the Corporate Seal of the said FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, this ---------- ---•------ 3-rd----- ------ ------.day of--------- ............... Apr.4•1.----_----------------, A.D. 19-13---- ATTEST: FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COI1?AXY OF MARYL.SND (SIGNED) -------------------------- P- -----N&C- �.-----------. By ---------------------------------------- PAUia--J____P:L,ill9a. T-------- (SEAL) Assistant Secretary Vice -President STATE OF MARYLAND 1 SS. CITY OF BALTIMORE J On this 3rd day of April A.D. 19 73 before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, in and for the City of Baltimore, duly coinmissioned and qualified, came the above -named Vice -President and Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, to me personally known to be the individuals and officers described in and who executed the preceding instrument: and they each acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly sworn, severally and each for himself deposeth and saith, that they are the said officers of the Company aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company, and that the said Corporate Seal and their signatures as such officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporation. 1N TEsrrrniovY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal, at the City of Baltimore, the day and year first above written. _-- Uf?f�_T_-llagFs Notary Public Commission Expires, _J!Ily--1-,-- 1974 (SIGNED) (SEAL) CEIITIF ICATE I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, do herehy certify that the original Poker of Attorney of which the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy, is in full force and etfect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certify that the Vice-Prc:.ident who executed the said Power of Attorney was one of the additional Vice -Presidents spe- cially authorizes! 1,} the Board of Director; to appoint any Attorney -in -Fact as provided in Article V1, Section 2 of the By -Laws of the FID:LITY AND DI --POSIT COMPANY OF NIARYLAND. Thi's Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directory of the 1'IDLLITY AND DEPOSIT CONIPANY OP MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held on the 16th day of July, 1969. REsol.VrD: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any Assistant Secretary of the Conipauy, w(Ictf-f inade heretofore or hereafter, wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney is»ued by the. Con,pa-o , sl ,11i be valid and binding upon the Company with the sarue force and effect as though manually affixed." IN TESTIMONY WIILRr:OH, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the curporate seas of the said C *rr,pany, this nr p ,TE}`ri:' e3:r' t L1419—Ctf. l..a ,' Assistxni .Secretary El RICHMOND NEWSPAPERS, INC. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES -DISPATCH Richmond, Va..... t!..3t .1973.......... This is to certify that the attached......... ��' Notice ............... ..................... was published in The Richmond Times -Dispatch, a newspaper published in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia. .....................................................................Oct. 3, 19?3 .............................. The first insertion being given ................ $ $?3 Fs orn subj&r efore me e�)'Iff r.. rr �- .... /�. .... SP► .... -ercc_ NotarY Pu blic State of Virginia, City of Richmond: My commission expires 2 / 2 S / 7 �ICrRu BUSI�iESS OfFI¢f ........................ TITLE O a w � bO O a go a t O 1° 03 o P 04 E-� H a) b o F O vw e0-4 Ape wm� a m °o a w s� Cd o 4-) .O a w ^ cad .c a) a m E ^ cd p; U ^ d-) Cd Cd 4J ^ Pa e7 �. go o ❑ «ti m (L) rd k-0 cd o •ri r+-4 H rd r-i $L4 w m ^ ^ z! 4-)cd b a � v 3 4 x ^> rd .! PQ •H •N r-i ❑ w A A cd > •r� (1) w � ^ Sq w m ^ � m rd ri Q x U ^ ^ ^ m a) CH d ^ r-1 a) a) .1.) •ri '� a) 4-3 U cd O m d 4-) rd Cd 'g: ,3,' rd U IL, a) 9-4 Cd •ri 'd sz: m a) Cd c-) m a) ^ N cd m a) O x 4 ; > r- I to m Oa) -P m z O � x ,c U z i U l0 CN a) H rd ' !: >, O PQ N a) E+ o a) 4 rl O cd ^ O m ^ x O •I-) O O H UN Cd H -I-) (1) X O U a U U •d \-D F-I o o to cn U " r--I Pa ^ C n A ` ^ ^ ::l r N a) 41 ON to Pa J•-) a) ^ H >� a) Par:: m ^ O cm 0; 1 i H w do CT H r" a) X 4 i a) X ^ m ^ Ar C :3: U ^ E-+ a) H H cd CV x E+ I w x ri as O cn O PA 1•r-I Ln H w Cd 3 4.3 O PA c F O 8 rd CD 4-. r 1 O Pr� si 7 W ^ W O m� M N ^ LC\ O p C) ^ N � 1 rJ V m H ^ rl CV ^ul ^ U () o F L) L(l R' ^ ( C/) -H�,' Cd rl 4-3 ^ 4-3O 4 i r� �" •1-3 a I I w .4 P� P� Cd bo ^ U CO Cd a) : N m O F-, ^ l L- cC w ^ m ^ m a) •d Z", a) bD ::I� 0 � � Cd rl cd r-4 P-� H 4.3 � m � cd S i a) Li z •H > a) FA cd � rl cd > m •ri .n r I rH U 4-3 ! ', Ls `t7' cd a) X -H m •r I w ] = Cd Q► O a U cd E1 CO Pa a) o X a) P; z o a) 3 N -rl z) x V m P+ v 0 •ri +3 m (1) v] m (1) •ri +3 r4 .C: b0 $� O z z Cd x a) �". d 4-1 H H > Cd 9-4 ;j •rl rl fi Cd Z O U •ri O a) O .K", O a) H r-A a) d Pa �a g Aoo 6, z w WOO Ma nl n1 `n {� Ow r cp. E �QW z - � umu t, H rb�Y ii � m C c W a ^ a c U+ C ❑� O m U O4-3 14 d pWi e s� - -� E. Q a � .0 Os A AWN bo O a d1 w pq O " -0 '--) w � cd b0 k�,0o N N H cc y W w ^ m cd O cd cd ^ a El4-) W m ^ Cd cd a� a^ ^ rd �> ^ ^ ❑ w bo W� zi � z m 1 a Cd 0 i a m ^ 5 a m v o p cd cd ro ni N ^ o ►�� ❑ Q'. A a) > C'+ q m 'd cd a) .N 1:1� O c) ^ rl a) a) ^ U O a) a) F i +3 P 0 Q; O cd 4-3 cd rd S 4 v) a) w rd a) o ^ (1) a +� A ° F a) o 43 m ^ rd o a� > F, cd O as .� U -H rl (Y, rd �", a, � rd Q) rd a) N ^ rd 'J m Q) .x Z coN x � � q �p cyl U ^ is' F a) �-1 Co � a) O> O O ro ri O � O \ ti N m r I rl R; f-a � rn rl x x m � o 00 O W ,C: U H 'J O 4-3 � f: cd U ^ N X cV � 3 m X O O W 0° ^ •r I ? U) 3 r—I U) O O cQ� rd O 3 U m cd O Z n N oo (D dp V) r4 r i �'. r--I Oo N m `d W r ^ \,D 4-) V) O O cn N O ^ ^ M 3 W L j O N �' O ^ cd to U O W 3 r-I N �' 00 z E'A 7 ^ o U (1) H PQ rCj ^ H m -N O a) Ci) LU .r{ a) 0:1 s:-, r-A to P�, O ^ ^ % O r-i a) .43 0 O H m m ^ a) cd ^ a) a) 10 U- U_. (Y LLD ::3 Cd w ri O a) a) "-� L13 ro () M O a) -N �. N m r ri vi %i �, Z O o U .� CO " CH a) w O �' m- o O U D •� U a) a) •� a •,� Z c) as o o rQ O�-D U co • 3 bo cd Cd z r I N a) U1 Q :j r� rs bo U $Lf i w U a) a a) ::% m •r, �-D ro -N d Q O m m � O ri m cd � o .N a CcO a F -D d 3 � 3 ►° 00 co w d0 t� �n�� C��ow ALa� Z W o M M M `n al ct1 m M cn `� "� "^ r �� l `n d�' ows A g F .r 04 M 0p cm O •+ 04 ka 1. 8 Q IQ n LL C • .m a aaqq O pq o o W P: 4 o m a a a m O ai y m U W o w C- m 0 m F b0 d o; A z w� as xw ^ cd ^ m o.0 m� aw •d cd . �21 w tH o ^ ^ rz a C v A. R C: rd cd 9 o li m F \ U �11 Cd a a c[3 U •ri ^ '^ 0 o cd ro fX 110 cd04 ^ xo o rd O a) cd cd ^ O U F, U a cd rd ^ o ^ .o •d 4-,) (1) ^ d cd .s~ ri v) Q .� ❑ o -1 $:I' liz: rl -r-i o z z rd z o Fa '"' rX o o o P� 5, a) cd r, o a) X •� os e°r fti C ri t� i", cd > (L) O 'J rd i; a m a) U ^ ^ U -1 < a i~ � O � ^ rd U a -, ❑ w� c4 A m a) .,-A X rd cd O o •r1 X ^ rd C) -r-i X rd cd O ri fX U 4.) r-i H U U -r-i ) H P', H bD X 0 >~ : rd X X a) O 4-3 •ri fX w ^ d U rd ^ O a) x a) N r� r1 a) rd � -P cd o I TA o cd 4-)zs a +) rd 3 > N a) X bD-H a) o `" I ' O O cd a) > .N-H •) Q a a-,) 'd F-, H 0) x C00 Q, a) o -N '� o r-i N co F-+ (1) F, N •r j M cd F i Ln 9-4x a) H F, W N a) Q Fa -a, r-I : F 4 "i I F 1 -:1- -N +) a) a1 4-3 ri F, t71 Co � z7 CQ VI Z U) (D °w v O - O D DC a) Q) N +� �j r-I r I a) ri to a) ri •ri A O F, H (1) U) ri r-1 0 fX ro O bC x O I e P� -P r-i F, a) r-1 C: F, M cd a) O U •ri a U) �J 4-) H M ::J m 1 j N ro x '2 0.4 4-3 rd o (1) H ^ x U? ,—i z O 00 cd r-i o c O ,-a 3 I I} W F H -i) U ^ \O a) (Z)00 N (D a) a) o \ � r i ri cd N W V) N •rl C)U 3 O i z \O 0 -:3- w N �J cm L` 00 ri L` O U'\ W W ^ O L` x CV 00 L` O: O F. O •-Z O ^ �:; cd N N O Ul N O U O (D m E i m al O ^ 00 t� \D ^ Lf� Cl U ri ,'�. I N ^ C)^ A bD •rl \O L` -P C: O \,o ^ ri r1 a) N W 'd ^ C: a) M 4-) a 08 ^ V) In .L: 4-3 P, a) M r l C iV A F" bD Lam- 'd rl r� U rd Z (1) bD Z •ri •ri •ri 1 w F, •'- r-1 -C: q N o cd ad sz: c) 5-: cd J� F4 M x 04 cd (1) CQ •ri a) cd -r-i S: U) F-f •ri Li. 0 o 0 3 o o r-i (::I F•, U ,-a W W z b0 «i rd I w F-D rA ri • o U U 0 rd 4-, ^ a) rd O E-+ z O ; cd IQ z cd U) z �:s a ::J ,a •ri m o E- wF-D OQ o 94 F, w U w U x 3 �j �c a) rd x a� = rd (1) a) -H M i H >., Q cd :E:>3 a) H r-I rd 9-1 4-) F•, Z cd r4 cd F-, a) F, cd N V) C) ) •rl ri r-i Fi ,-a r U) rd F, •r1 cd a) -r-i _- U C: , 3 3 O 'd r-I •ri F4 O a) F♦ v 3 ,Q > cd Fa o a) r-1 rd cd cd F, 'd o •ri F, a) •ri F, a W w U E-A PX [ U) a > U a PG pq Io w M1M, C a W �\ L\ �, �, �\ o 1 /� 41 Z A Z N Q m w E. M SrJ K` cq Iz 1 cc1 �� c!1 n ctl C' rr� cc� C. rA waw zi ep .ew ow l- 00 0 0 i 0 A r u 0 19 M M T A K E N 0 T I C E That the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County will, on Wednesday, 10 October 1973, beginning at 2:30 P.M., in the County Board Room at Chesterfield Courthouse, Virginia, take under consideration the rezoning and the granting of conditional uses on the parcels of land described herein. Copies of these amendments are on file in the Planning Department, Room 307, Office Building, Chesterfield Courthouse, Chesterfield, Virginia, for public examination between the hours of 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. of each regular business day. APPLICANT AND/OR AGENT MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARING All persons favoring or opposing the granting of the above requests are invited to appear at the time and place herein stated. Michael C. Ritz, Director of Planning County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Bd. - October 10, 1973 *7 5O94 In Dale Magisterial District Mason Property Associates requests he rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-2), 65 acres, and Townhouses for Sale (R-7), 25 acres, two parcels of land of irregular shape, fronting approximately 2800 ft. on the north line of Beulah Road (Rt. 641), and being located approximately 800 ft. southwest of the intersection of Beulah Road and Hopkins Road (Rt. 637). Refer to Tax Map Sec. 66-7 (1) parcels 2 & 4 (Sheet 22). *73SO95 In Dale Magisterial District Diversified Development, Inc. requests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-2), 110 acres, and to Townhouses for Sale (R-7), 40 acres, several parcels of land of irregular shape, fronting approximately one-half mile on the southeast line of Salem Church Road (Rt. 642)2 extending southeastwardly to a depth of approximately 3000 ft., and being located approximately L one-half mile northeast of the intersection of Salem Church Road and Centralia Road (Rt. 145). Refer to Tax Map Sec. 96-2 (1) parcel 8, 96-3 (1) parcel 1 and 96-7 (1) parcel 5 (Sheet 31). 7 5112 In Clover Hill Magisterial District Lloyd C. Journigan, Jr. requests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to General Business (B-3) (7.7 acres) and Light Industrial (M-1) (11.6 acres) several parcels of land of irregular shape, containing 30.7 acres, fronting approximately 1700 ft. on Hull Street Road (Rt. 360), extending southeastwardly to a �r depth of approximately 500 ft., and being located at the intersection of Hull Street Road and Pocoshock Road. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 40-5 (1) parcels 6, 7 & 8 (Sheet 15). /Ar733S115 In Clover Hill Magisterial District Vivian Earl Pace & Pauline Goodman Pace request the rezoning from General Business (B-3) to Heavy Industrial (M-3) of a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 3.41 acres, fronting approximately 309 ft. on Goodes Bridge Road (Rt. 1668), extending westwardly to a depth of approximately 500 ft., and being located approximately 1400 ft. north of the intersection of Goodes Bridge Road and Walmsley Blvd. (Rt. 647). Refer to Tax Map Sec. 40-2 (1) parcel 20-6 (Sheet 15). 73SI18 In Matoaca Magisterial District Brewster S. Hill requests the Jr rezoning from Convenience Business (B-1) to Residential (R-2) of a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 0.67 acre, fronting approximately 230 ft. on the south line of River Road (Rt. 602), and being located approximately 100 ft. west of the intersection of River Road and Chester- field Avenue. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 182-9 (1) parcel 3 (Sheet 53/54). 735120 In Clover Hill Magisterial District W. Eugene Glenn, Inc. re- quests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to General Business (B-3) of a parcel of land of rectangular shape, containing 1.10 acres, fronting approximately 100 ft. on the south line of Midlothian Turnpike (Rt. 60), extending southwardly to a depth of approximately 500 ft., and being located approximately 1600 ft. east of the intersection of Midlothian Turnpike and Research Road. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 17-10 (1) parcel 6 Sheet 8). *These cases were deferred by the Board of Supervisors at previous meetings to their October 10, 1973 meeting. r Bd. - October 10, 1973 73S121 In Bermuda Magisterial District Wil-Car Company, Inc. requests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) and Light Industrial (M-1) to General Industrial (M-2) of two parcels of land of irregular shape, containing 157.75 acres, fronting approximately 3300 ft. on the south line of West Hundred Road (Rt. 10), extending southwardly to a depth of approximately 2000 ft., and being located approximately 400 ft. east of the intersec- tion of West Hundred Road and Pine Bark Road. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 117-9 (1) parcel 5 and 117-10 (1) parcel 16 (Sheet 33). 73S123 In Clover Hill Magisterial District George E. Hamlett requests a Conditional Use Permit to operate a Fire Extinguisher Sales and Service from an accessory building on a parcel of land of irregular shape zoned Agricultural (A), containing 6.25 acres, fronting approximately 100 ft. on the east line of Newby's Bridge Road (Rt. 651), extending eastwardly to a depth of approximately 500 ft., and being located approximately three -fourths of a mile northeast of the intersection of Newby's Bridge Road and Qualla Road (Rt. 653). Refer to Tax Map Sec. 63 (1) parcel 16-4 (Sheet 21). 73S125 MOBILE HOMES Clover Hill District Rebecca Wills Located at 6507 Walmsley Blvd. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 40-7 (1) Parcel 1 (Sheet 15). 73S126 Dale District Wiley K. Wells Located at 2904 Falling Creek Avenue. Refer to Tax Map Sec. 42-1i (3) Blk. B, lot 1, Falling Creek Subdivision (Sheet 16). M 19 PLANNING COMMISSION AND PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS & REPORTS FOR REZONING AND CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTS to be heard by the CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Wednesday, October 10, 1973 DEFERRED CASES mmummmomor- 73SO94 Mason Property Associates Dale Magisterial District Tax Map Sec. 66-7 (I) parcels 2 & 4 (Sheet 22 ) This case was deferred from the September 12, 1973 meeting at the request of the applicants so that they could meet with adjoining property owners to further discuss the merits and ramifications of this request. Request to rezone from Agricultural (A) to Townhouse for Sale (R-7) and Residential (R-2). General Plan: Single family residential Planning Commission recommendation: APPROVAL All vo a aye. 73SO95 Diversified Development, Inc. Dale Magisterial District Tax Map Sec. 96-2 (1) parcel 8, 96-3 (1) parcel 1 and 96-7 (1) parcel 5 (Sheet 31) This case was deferred from the September 12, 1973 meeting at the request of the applicant so that he might be allowed an opportunity to meet with an area PTA. Request to rezone from Agricultural (A) to Townhouse for Sale (R-7) and Residential (R-2). General Plan: Vacant/Agricultural Planning Commission recommendation: APPROVAL All vote aye. M n REZONING AND CONDITIONAL USES 73S112 Lloyd C. Journigan, Jr. Clover Hill Magisterial District Tax Map Sec. 40-5 (1) parcels 6, 7 & 8 (Sheet 15) Request to rezone from Agricultural (A) to General Business (B-3) and Light Industrial (M-1). General Plan: Planning Commission recommendation: Single family residential APPROVAL (OF THE AMENDED REQUEST) All vote aye except Mr. Price who votes no. 73S115 Vivian Earl Pace & Clover Hill Magisterial District Pauline GooOman dace Tax Map Sec. 40-2 (1) parcel 20-6 (Sheet 15) Request to rezone from General Business (B-3) to Heavy Industrial (M-3). General Plan: Commercial development Planning Commission recommendation: DENIAL All vote aye. 73S118 Brewster S. Hill t Matoaca Magisterial District Tax Map Sec. 182-9 (1) parcel 3 (Sheet 53/54) Request to rezone from Convenience Business (B-1) to Residential (R-2). General Plan: Commercial development Planning Commission recommendation: APPROVAL All vote aye. 73S120 W. Eugene Glenn, Inc. Clover Hill Magisterial District Tax Map Sec. 17-10 (1) parcel 6 (Sheet 8) - 2 - n Request to rezone from Agricultural (A) to General Business (B-3). General Plan: Planning Commission recommendation: 73S121 Wil-Car Company, Inc. Commercial development APPROVAL SUBJECT TO A 50 FT. BUFFER BEING PROVIDED ALONG THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE. MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS TO AND FROM THE PROPERTY SHOULD BE PERMITTED. NO PARKING All vote aye. Clover Hill Magisterial District Tax Map See. 117-9 (1) parcel 5 and 117-10 (1) parcel 16 (Sheet 33) Request to rezone from Agricultural (A) and Light Industrial (M-1) to General Industrial (."-2). General Plan: Planning Commission recommendation: Commercial and industrial use APPROVAL S A. "A 11'111 .L U,1J All vote aye. TO A 100 FT U 73S123 George E. Hamlett Midlothian Magisterial District Tax Map Sec. 63 (1) parcel 16-4 (Sheet 21) Request is for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a Fire Extinguisher Sales and Service. General Plan: -3- Single family residential Q Planning Commission recommendation: APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The operation of the requested fire extinguisher sales and service business shall be restricted and confined to the interior of the largest outbuilding which is located directly behind the existing residence. 2. No outside storage of materials, equipment, or supplies shall be permitted. 3. No sign shall be permitted. 4. The hours of operation shall be restricted to between 9:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M. Monday through Saturday. No Sunday operation shall be permitted. 5. Any addition or alteration to the existing structure, either directly or indirectly in conjunction with this operation, shall be approved by the Planning Department. 6. This operation shall be subject to the approval of the Chesterfield County Fire :'administration and all applicable County and State Laws regulating such an operation shall apply. Approval of the County Fire Administration shall be obtained prior to the commencing of any operation. All vote aye. MOBILE HOMES 735125 Rebecca Wills Clover Hill Magisterial District Tax Map Sec. 40-7 (1) parcel 11 (Sheet 15) The Health Department reports no environmental health hazard in existence. The mobile h--me is parked on property belonging to the applicant. Adjacent property owners state no objection to this request which is for two years. The first permit was issued October 13, 1971. 735126 Wiley K. Wells Dale Magisterial District Tax Map Sec. 42-14 (3) Blk B, Lot 3 (Sheet 16) The Health Department reports no environmental health hazard in existence. The mobile home will be parked on property Mary Adcox, sister-in-law of the applicant. Adjacent property owners state no objection to this request which is for two ,years. Respectfullyxk<-�a_g� submi.tted, Stanley' R. Balderson, Jr. Chief Planner Chesterfield County Planning Dept. - 4 - � C.OARD OF SUPERVISO CH ESTERFI" MASON PROPERTY, ASSOCIATES 5905 West Broad St. Richmond, Virginia 23230 June 25, 1973 Mr. Michael C. Ritz Re: Mason Property Director of Planning Chesterfield Court House, Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Ritz: Enclosed please find the following: 1. Check payable to the Treasurer, County of Chesterfield 2. Application for rezoning 3. Copy of Extension Agreement on subject property 4. Plats and land plan of subject property If there is any question concerning the above appli- cation, please feel free to give me a call at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Kenneth M. Joyner Partner Mason Property Associates KMJ : ed JrUN 1973 Enc. 00 PLANNING DEPT. S CHESTERFJELD CUNTY At VIRGINIA �� LEITH S. BREMNER (I867-IEIa B) L. PAUI BYRNE JANIES A. BASER, LII JAMES H. MONTGOMERY. JR. MLJRRAY J. JANUS C. BRAXTON VALENTINE, JR. CLAUDE C. FARMER,JR WILLIAM B. KER KAM, III SCOTT H. SWAN EDWARD D. BARNES DENIS C. ENGLISBY LAW OFFICES BREMNER, BYRNE & BABER SUITE ISOO SEVENTH AND FRANKLIN BUILDING 701 EAST FRANKLIN STREET RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23207 TELEPHONE (703) 644-0721 September 5, 1973 Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Chesterfield Courthouse Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 IN RE: Zoning Case 73-S-094 Dear Mr. Burnett: SANDSTON OFFICE 309 EAST WILLIAMSBURG ROAD SANDSTON, VIRGINIA 23150 Your records will indicate that this office is the legal representative in the above zoning case. It is requested that this matter be deferred from the' Board of Supervisors meeting on September 12, 1973, to October 10, 1973. The purpose of this request is to permit my clients to arrange another meeting with the representatives of the adjoining property owners in an effort to amicably settle this matter. Also, during this period, we would be able to finalize our development plan and complete various engineering reports which have been requested and which are essential to the presentation of this case. The consideration of the Board in granting this request will be greatly appreciated. Yours very truly, L. Paul yrne LPB:djc cc: Hon. J. Ruffin Apperson�UU�J'I\ cc: Mr. Elbert Howard cc: Kelly E. Miller, Esquire- .� ® 13 tton cc: Mr. Michael1Ritz o� r- E'� cc: Mr. Lawrence Mason cc: Mr. Sonny Sneed cc: Mr. Kenneth M. Joyner ` �� yh 'A �� t I m On i m m cm / /� e �o a � o�" �Saoo �� il-17 � )PA- ka-&- 7 -7-4 oo,,e a,-_ -zz U Zee— W-el . jle5t� Y` 7 J m 4 Btu" %- 197 m ,SdA ylzxaal-� 4c'ck,� On Py 73 jl_e��7 - 1177 3 6i4 Ire* j�6� �„,u Jew c� 4af �, I�F7 3 Gam`" ° o �,� �r12 �i�w y.�y� 4 - � fin`.-� �-�` �"� 1AA 06ct,- wj-/ /. 04 �� CIZ Scott F. Blankinship 7301 Cumbermede Road, Richmond, Virginia 23234 kc Ilei1.�L1 J `Z/d yr dim 7i,,) RcDo 1 R m" 7 !� 6 c,4c lx F.D 3 Scott F. Blankinship 4 7301 Cumbermede Road, Richmond, Virginia 23234 141 IL '//C-�� -4 �W Scott F. Blankinship. ''MOO 7301 Cumbermede Road, Richmond, Virginia 23234 M M October 3, 1973 J. Ruffin Apperson Supervisor, Dale District 7710 Beach Road, RFD 3 Chesterfield, Va. 23832 Dear Sir: Just a few lines to let you know I am opposed to the town -houses that are con- templated on being built close to Beulah United Methodist Church. Our area is rapidly becoming over -crowded, over -schooled, {more pupils than we really have room for 1, and over town -housed. The residential homes I am not opposed to, however, placing town -houses in the center of a larger area where residential homes would hide them makes me suspect of the entire project. These are my feelings however inadequately they may have been expressed. Sinc Ay yours, (! aban K. Lauver 4025 Saldale Drive Richmond, Va. 23234 Fuqua Farms n 3940 Durrette Drive Richmond, Virginia 23234 October 4, 1973 Mr. J. Ruffin Apperson Dale District Supervisor R. F. D. #3, Box 1-AA Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Apperson; Neat week, at your regular Board of Supervisors' meeting, there is scheduled a request for rezoning of a parcel on Beulah Road known as the Mason Tract. The site is near the village of Beulah and near our home in Fuqua Farms. The developer plans a central core of multifamily units surrounded by single family. We would prefer to attend your meeting to oppose this proposal for mulitfamily, however, the hour makes this impossible as we both work. 'Ne would be most grateful if you wi I 1 oppose this intro- duction of more mdjltifamiIy development in our community. We do not oppose the single family detached zonina, and would be happy to see the entire tract zoned to that use. Many thanks for your fine representation of our district on our Board. Sincerely, Lewis E. King Louise 0. King In m m m ' 4.; 3 /9"73 ,�, ► � `_ ,� 1, 1 Edgar A. Williams, Jr. 3925 Saldale Drive Richmond, Va. 23234 0 October 3, 1973 J. Ruf Fin ATnerson. 7710 Beoch Road RFD-3 Chesterfield, Va. 23.932 Dear Air. Apperson : There -:-ill be a rezoning case on October 10, 1973, concerning a 90 acre track of land on Beulah Rd., approximately 800' south of Honlcins Rd. This rezoning request will be asking for approximately 65 acres to be rezoned from agriculture to residential (R-2) and the remaining 25 acres to be rezoned to to- rehouse s TH- 7. This district has fvr sometime tolerated the influx of anartment- and t-��anhouses, ho-,7Pver9 as a cltize'-7. of the area , I would rec,mmond defeat of this reliiest: for ,additional townhouses. This particular track of land, if rezoned to TH-7, will be setting precedent for a l,rger track of land which joins this narta:ca .lar t-rack. I -,7ould sincerely anpreci ate your influence toward defeat of this request for To-,:mhouses TH-7. Sincerely, Al2, er-ey 1. Litton iL w /* jt, n M Mr. J. Ruffin Apperson Dale District Supervisor 7710 Beach Road, RFD 3 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Sir: 3908 Durrette Drive Richmond, Virginia 23234 October 9, 1973 I am writing in regards to the proposed construction of townhouse units on Beulah Road near its intersection with Hopkins Road. The townhouse concept is a good one if the area in which they are constructed will support them. I do not feel this area will do so for two reasons: first, the Hopkins Road area is already congested with traffic from both Chippenham Parkway and those commuting to and from Bellwood. These multiple family dwellings could only worsen matters. Secondly and most important, is the school situation. Beulah Elementary School is now becoming crowded, and the addition of this project will overcrowd the present structure greatly. I would prefer to see this land used in a housing development rather than townhouses or apartments. Your cooperation in this matter will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, c W. C. Hamilton Fuqua Farms Resident WCH/ j s M E5 Oct 9, 1973 Mr. J. Ruffin Apperson Supervisor, Dale District Chesterfield County Dear Ruffin, Please be advised of the opposition of myself and my wife to the petition of certain developers for zoning changes to build multi —family dwellings on and near Beulah Rd. in the vicinity of Hopkins Rd. It is our understanding this matter will be presented for your consideration at your meeting Oct 10. I cannot attend that meeting but would like very much for my voice to be heard through your representation. I trust you will oppose granting the zoning change for these petitioners. My primary reasons are inadequate roads, too much increase in traffic and traffic hazzards, overcrowded schools in the imme— diate area, and my reluctance to see multi —family housing come into this area. I feel we already have more than enough in other nearby areas, and would like to see only single family dwellings continue to be built in the area. Thank you for your consideration of my view and that of my wife. Sincerely, C>4 T. L. Dupre 3916 Walworth Dr. (Fuqua Farms) /�7 ate✓ L..cJ,2�� ,e� G�%�� -QJ��D/�.aa ia:� /tA 41-1 ,� �� me �`� ✓�� V� 3 3 � m m Dear Mr. Apperson, October 10, 1973 3933 Durrette Drive Richmond, Virginia 23234 My husband and I wish to express to you our opinion that the construction of townhouses in the area of Beulah School should be opposed. We feel that this type of multi -family dwelling is inappropriate to the area already developed. Also we feel that the added traffic congestion from these units would present a hazard to the school,. church and others in the area. We appreciate your interest and concern on our behalf. Sincerely, Jo Ann and Jac old M M Mr. J. Ruffin Dale District RFD #3, Beach Chesterfield, Apperson, Jr. Supervisor Road Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Apperson: October 9, 1973 We are opposed to the rezoning of the area near the intersection of Beulah and Hopkins Road to permit construction of townhouses. We moved to this area in Fuqua Farms during the early stages of develop- ment. The growth of this area has been tremendous since 1963. The traffic conditions are very bad during rush hour traffic in this area. The Hopkins Road-Chippenham Parkway and Dundas Road -Route #1 intersections are real bottlenecks. We feel that future growth such as will be nurtured by the construction of townhouses will only aggrevate these conditions. Another factor we must consider is our school capacity. Our present school system will not support the addition of students brought in through further townhouse construction. Already, the fourth grade in Beulah Elementary School has been moved to another school. Some fourth graders are now riding 2 buses each way in order to get to school. None of the homes in our area have county sewers available. We feel that it is more important to extend sewer lines to existing homes than to approve the rezoning of any of this area to encourage or allow the construction of townhouses. We earnestly solicit your support in denying the requested rezoning. Sincerely, Rosalie S. Litton i Vv - ZZ4'4� Cly e W. Litton 4220 McHoward Road Richmond, Virginia 23234 m � ,t�,.a /Z Jr �.s, /24f jz�,� J, 7,tr�:. ?. m m m to at PAO& ism *,Ab4liVi*l*% Vp POOO, US U*AWW '"W"rtt 'Am"s appWadmatsl$ OW toot c jr4ol -at latorsoatim Ot at CRO"D 7 94 i io*Aw =�d md COM TO TOW2 to ammumme b x of kilapkins Pood and 3w+*aJ*Vdlao Mvd*)* zo NO a a do /Ali 1-7 IA" 7At.a, lie We, the undergi ed residents of Fuqua Farms Subdivisions oppose the rezoning houses approximately 800 feet �hwest of intersection of of Case 73S'094rt (residentR-2 to convenience Hopkins and Beul:�wcad) and Case 73S110 business B-li, Corner of Hopkins Road and meadowdale Blvd.). AD NAME DEESS I%W doryk IO*W �A) Aj I /k I%W C /669 M M M m m the A--4 19pl- of ftpx� Vann ftbdiv:L*Lon# oppose the msqK —764 01 1 of 1 CA" 73"4 - I - **Uns and 30OWSO") Md 000 T382iO' (vesideatia H-2 to conventenow ,bwamse i�.Jq eamer of RopkLrA PAwd and Mm&mdalo Mvdo). */Oq a,*vwouc/ . 1,2x m m Mg;7r W-7. M m m m m lit- k,,, /� I o 37/7 �g,q�Cr X4 . 81Y6 � 464 r *I- e-lHIL bf- We. the undersigned residents of Fuqua Farms Subdividion, oppose the rezoning of Case ?3so94 (tc� i,ouses approximately 000 feet s 1hwest of intersection of Hopkins and Beulah -Toad) and Case ?3S110 (residenti R--2 to convenience business B-19 corner of Hopkins Road and Meadowdale Blvd.). NAME M M ADDRESS 7D o S- !Yew the undersigned residents of Fuqua Fann Subdivision, oppose the rezoning of Came. 73SO94 ,.hOUOOs approximately W feet hwest of intersection of Hopkins and Boulah-Moad) and Cam 73=0 (residentiM R�-2 to oomenlence business B-19 corner of Hopkins Road and Ileadowdale Blvd*)O �lw A=Ss z m 4L, NrWWO 'Weg the mndex*igvAd residents of Fuqua Farces SO& --i.siong oppose the rezoning 'of Case 73SO94 s approximately 800 feet%g4uthwist of intersection of 'a % Hopkins and BeulaU R ) and Case 73S110 (residential R-2 to convenienoo :business B-1,, corner of Hopkins Road and Meadowdale 331vde)* M�ffm � 1/� / /;Z, 77- AaL 70 o �)A Xd, -7 1, 14. m m nu m m m m m iwe U,* eol&nts at Fuqm ftm 3&udLvAsLc% oppose U* resmAng cam and Umlah Wed) wd C#A* 7)="a 4�* to R=Iim- 4F B40 com"ar Ot FW&LUS PA" '134 AN&Mftao TIV400 AA" Az w Jqq� � L We, the undersigrgd residents of Fuqua Farms Subdi--ision, oppose the rezoning of Case 73SO94 ( anhouses approximately 800 feet',*/duthwest of intersection of Hopkins and Beulah Road) and Case 73S110 (residential R-2 to convenience business B-19 corner of Hopkins Road and Meadowdale Blvd.). M 1 M M M- IR 10611 M m M- e — 3;e,a.e or oe• - ��.Ozr xye, We. the undergi d residents of Fuqu& paresSubdividiang, oppose the VOSMing of Case 738O94 rto tov-,-Oulms apprambately #00 feet w-4-vest of intersection of Hopkins and Beulah` .") sad ON* 73=0 (residantU%-2 to omVenienoo business B-19 oomer of RopkIns Road and Meadovd&le Blvd.). m Lq-q c/ I i-,C/ " - ' /X-1� I m m m ADM= P97 m m m M m ivelsiPied Development,.1- 5905 West Broad Street Richmond. Virginia 23230 703/285-9054 July 23, 1973 Mr. Michael C. Ritz Director of Planning Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Re: Mason Property Zoning Case 73SO94 Diversified Development, Inc. Zoning Case 73SO95 Dear Mr. Ritz: As indicated in our request for a deferral dated July 9, 1973, we would like to have an impact study prepared on both of the above referenced cases. We have employed the firm of Rountrey & Associates to prepare this report and will forward same to you as soon as it is completed. Your cooperation in this matter is greatly apprec- iated. KMJ:ed Sincerely, Kenneth M. Joyne President cc: Paul Byrne Stan Balderson v LEITH S. BREMNER (1887-1968) L. PAUL BYRNE JAMES A. BASER, 2A JAMES H. MONTGOMERY, JR. MURRAY J. JANUS C. BRAXTON VALENTINE, JR. CLAUDE C. FARMER, JR. WILLIAM B. KERKAM, III SCOTT H. SWAN EDWARD D. BARNES DENIS C. ENGLISBY LAW OFFICES BREMNER,BYRNE & BABER SUITE 1500 SEVENTH AND FRANKLIN BUILDING 701 EAST FRANKLIN STREET RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23207 TELEPHONE (703) 644-0721 Mr. Michael C. Ritz Director of Planning County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 July 12, 1973 IN RE: Mason Property Associates - Zoning Case 73SO94 Diversified Development, Inc. - Zoning Case 73SO95 Dear Mr. Ritz: SANDSTON OFFICE 309 EAST WILLIAMSBURG ROAD SANDSTON, VI RGINIA 23150 The undersigned is the representative of the applicants in the above zoning cases both of which are now scheduled to be heard before the Planning Commission of Chesterfield County on July 17, 1973. I plan to be out of the city on vacation from the 15th through the 31st of July, 1973. In view of the above, it is requested that these cases be rescheduled for the August 21, 1973 meeting of the Planning Commission and referral to the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on September 12, 1973. I understand that my clients have advised the adjacent property owners of this request for deferral. Yours very truly, L. Paul ne ��c�16111R 19��, LPB:djc cc: Mr. Kenneth M. Joyner ,VL �9`to �kE�E� oEQ� W �Ai,�\\E6\11N�V► r May 10, 1973 Mr. Kenneth M. Joyner _ Diversified Development, Inc. 5905 West Broad Street Richmond, Virginia 23230 Re: Mason Contract Dear Mr. Joyner: We, the undersigned, do hereby agree to extend our contract dated May 8, 1972, with your firm until August I, 1973 with settle- ment to be no later than August 15, 1973. This extension is granted on the following two conditions: (1) All sewer, drainage a, �dd Zngj _er,�ng, studies have been satisfied and; (2) Application for'at� zoning must be filed with the proper governing authorities within this sixty-day extension; however, if said application is deferred or continued beyond the sixty-day period, the above -referenced extension will be continued until the Board rules on this request for rezoning. Please sign a copy of this letter to show your agreement to this extension. Witness 3 C -y� I•.imess Sincerely yours, Mrs. Florence Miller Kenneth M. Joyner President LEITH S. BREMNER (I887-1966) L. PAUL BYRNE JAMES A. BASER, III JAMES H. MONTGOMERY, JR. MURRAY J. JANUS C. BRAXTON VALENTINE,JR. CLAUDE C. FARMER, JR. WILLIAM B. KERKAM, III SCOTT H. SWAN EDWARD D. BARNES DENIS C. ENGLISBY LAW OFFICES BREMNER,BYRNE & BABER SUITE 1500 SEVENTH AND FRANKLIN BUILDING 701 EAST FRANKLIN STREET RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23207 TELEPHONE (703) 644-0721 Mr. Michael C. Ritz Director of Planning County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 July 12, 1973 IN RE: Mason Property Associates - Zoning Case 73SO94 Diversified Development, Inc. - Zoning Case 73SO95 Dear Mr. Ritz: SANDSTON OFFICE 309 EAST WILLIAMSBURG ROAD SANDSTON, VIRGINIA 23150 The undersigned is the representative of the applicants in the above zoning cases both of which are now scheduled to be heard before the Planning Commission of Chesterfield County on July 17, 1973. I plan to be out of the city on vacation from the 15th through the 31st of July, 1973. In view of the above, it is requested that these cases be rescheduled for the August 21, 1973 meeting of the Planning Commission and referral to the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on September 12, 1973. I understand that my clients have advised the adjacent property owners of this request for deferral. Yours very truly, L. Paul ne LPB:djc cc: Mr. Kenneth M. Joyner "N ersiRed Development) Im- - 5905 West Broad Street *40 Richmond, Virginia 23230 703/285-9054 July 23, 1973 t t � 'Oka -z Mr. Michael C . Ritz Director of Planning Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Re: Mason Property Zoning Case 73SO94 Diversified Development, Inc. Zoning.Case 73SO95 Dear Mr. Ritz: As indicated in our request for a deferral dated. July 9, 1973, we would like to have an impact study. prepared on both of the above referenced cases. We have employed the firm of Rountrey & Associates to prepare this report and will forward same to you as soon as it is completed. Your cooperation in this matter is greatly apprec- iated. Sincerely,. r" o�'� t Kenneth M. Joyne President KMJ:ed cc: Paul Byrne Stan Balderson n \JL M iversi fled Development,1Y 5905 West Broad Street Richmond, Virginia 23230 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 703/285-9054 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY June 25, 1973 Mr. Michael C. Ritz Re: Oakley-Spragin Property Director of Planning Chesterfield Court House, Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Ritz: Enclosed please find the following: 1. Check payable to the 'treasurer, County of Chesterfield 2. Application for rezoning 3. Copy of Extension Agreement on subject property 4. Plats and land plan of subject property If there is any question concerning the above appli- cation, please feel free to give me a call at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Kenneth M. Joyner% `�✓ President KMJ:ed Enc. 0Ll'r '* g JUN 1973 p i RANt:i,,,�i CotER to COW n. IAA r' Imo! .. . ._ .. ,.... .... ... :. _.. _....� .y . �' t ,, ,, ,, ,, ,. ,� , . �- �� .. , 1 1 __...._- m m E M M THIS AGREE:`tZ,,;T , 'wade this llth day of April, 1973, by and between EY and DOROTh'Y D- OBEY, his wife, parties of the first I1RNAti'DO C • 0�' referred to as "Sellers," and DIVERSIFIED DEVELOP1i"r.�`IT, part, hereinafter hereinafter referral INC., a Virginia corporation, party of the second part, to as "Buyer' sellers represent that they are the fee simple owners of MERE.AS, S of 1l9 acres, more or less, the hereinafter described real estate consisting o belonging, and are will - with certain improvements and appurtenances thereto ing to sell said property to 'Buyer in consideration of the payment of by Buyer to Sellers, upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, i to purchase said property subject to the s willin,21 t i WHEREAS, Buyer ig terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, � IN CONS IDMATIO:z OF 1:L'TtJr1L CO c-VENA'r'TS A-,M OTBER TERMS NOW, THEREFORE, i WILNBSS THIS �%GR:.Etic*iT ;i: AM, CONMITIONS g�INAFTER SET FORT�i, tion o 1• Buyer hereby agrees to pay to Seller upon the execu t b Seller cash in the amount of ONE T'�iOLiSA?iD iS1,Ofl0.00) ,s this Agreement y i able to Buyer only in the event that a title e.Yamition of I DOLLARS refund if any 1 the property reveals that the title is rot marketable or defects, Seller within a reasonable time.there be, cannot be cured y or its nominee, a agree to convey to Buyer, 2• Sellers hereby g Y by General oad and marketable title to the follo'dinS described property, S free and cleat of English Convemant3, i r Warranty Deed containing tre usual five` ng of a deed of trust to 3e hza e:{�.�,p Ling to li_a all 11ans grit: 211CU+'�1�Ji�:�� t 9, .Cil �d by Sellers, �4cSL11� �� r and recorded at to deferred puBuyer's aNPen3ev "rid apprav�- -rzasa monay note, and Subject all ease - gated an;; naf ter de3cribed . } ecord: r restrictions and ,conditions of r m,n _s M certain tracts or parcels of land fronting ALL those two is ch Road adjoining Centralia on the east line of l daCounty, Virginia, containin*dl10 to Gardans, e e � r acres, of which 1-9 acres is thdeed from :�oye 9,2e land o . eThom'" Iiernsndo C. Oa:{lay and wife by dated December 13, 1950, recorded December 20, and wife , 1950, in the Clerk's office of the Circuit Court of C es - and one acre being the same lard subse- terf field County, and wife from Wash. quently acquired by Hernando C. Oalcley d ation of the foregoing, Buyer hereby agrees to cause M 4' 1 1 3. In consi er to be e�camined forthwith, and to have a plat of i the title to the property be made, at Buyer's expense, and a C°Py of which survey of said property to be attached to and to become a part of this Agreement both for pur- plat is to Purchase price i pees of description the and the datezminatfOn_°f the exact Per acre, as P DOLL.�RS p in the amount °f ti adjusted in accord with said survey* ay to Sellers in cash at closing, upon 4. Buyer hereby agrees to P h 2 to Buyer, delivery of the deed referred to in Para�r;P nt referred to in Paragraph i including the Payme pERCE21T of the purchase price, shall be applied 1 above, which said amount against the cash payment due at !' closing. Qrees to execute and deliver to Sailers a promissory �i 5, Buyer also ao of the purchase al amount of S�IE,`tTY-OD%. (il%) PERCENT note in the princip price of the Property as determined by survey, plus interest, payable semi- � ) p�C^iiT �r ll upon the unpaid balance, at the rate of SEVjN {7: Par ann anaua Y aid in i until the unpaid balance due has been P full - it from the date of closing �` principal balance due upon said rota shall be payable in no more than ten The sole i; 0 equal u:�nual installments, the first of which shall be due an pay {1 Q ear after the date of CIO, n3 plus intrre..�t as ,aforesaid, any there - one (1) y xss in- ... a like instalL�•ent p iion each succeeding aaniv�rsary of closing after, +ntil both principal and interest are paid in full., terest shall be due u time after the first anniversary of s% capt that Sellers also agree that at any principal and closing, without penalty, Buyer may anticipate psTments °f p E -2- i, j is i OLiSADID ($1,000.00) DOLLARSi in multiples of no less than 0 Tx is of principal, interest� �• with respect to the principal, and which said advance paymen ent due Sellers. 1 will be credited aga inst the next annual install' j it any, payment referred to in Paragraph 4 6. In consideration of the pa Ym purchase e from the lien of t money nree to e:{chidhe P 1 above, Se11er3 hereby ao 30 acres to be deed of trust a contiguous + parcel of no more than thirty C ) 3, and which said parcel � let referred to in Pasoore h P 1 designated upon the _ P ii shall have no more than five hundred (500) feet of frontage upon Salem P.oad. ; Sellers also hereby agree to join � Provided the said mate is not in d�,..fault, u - i instruments required by Buyer for purposes of releas y in the execution of any portions of the deed of trust those Purchase money ±: iag from the lien of the p approved by 1s lan of development as 1 to be used in accord with the p. alleys. property streets, i l areas, ourtq for corsmon areas, recreationa Che3terfield C water, seers, , gas, electricity, %` and utility easements for storm and sanitary uxchasa money in any curtail upon the def erred p it and telephone, with requiring he total dedicated areas do not exceed 20% of the 1; note, to the ex tent that t i 4 excepting further, that any and all such instruments shall be pre- 4 property, � pared and recorded at ro expense to Sellers. 1; ti Buyer's expense additional to release }� 7. Sellers also hereby agree at Buy u on .the payment by Buyer of as a- ` contiguous acreage as requested by Buyer, P plus interest ac- mount equal to al with respect to a:•y rorata amount of principal ! plus a P ; cruel to date and, a- i; �cQpt that until such time as the principal. t`. fractional part of an acre, PIi'TY , purchase move note, shall have been reduced by mount of the deferred p y 1; _ addis..ional irontag= on Sal= Road shall be released• i i (50%) ; :�.,Cr,-N'T, no 4 reememt shall ba made, ccntin jent, g. Cl.oai.. ' raz:with respect to this . g . i specifically, upon the following conditions: j• f, It -3 � 1 �1 .. ,.•.. a•iMs* uR r4h ... ' M M including test borin?s satisfactory to (a) Engineering study, Buyer; gate (b) Written assurances from Chesterfield County that ade4 1 JeWe: and water facilities are available to the property; I l Written approval by Chesterfield County of Buyer plan of (c) development. 9. Sellers hereby grant Buyer permission to enter upon the property graph 8• Buyer a for the purposes set forth above in Para grees to proceed � � against Selh.rs ao �! forthwith with its plans for development and to indemnify i,property in connection with Buyer's activities upon the p p y �i any and all liability !! or in the event that the condi- until the date of closing of this Agreement, table to Buyer, Buyer agrees to tions set forth in Paragraph 8 are not acceptable of this forthwith of its intention with respect notify Sellers fortto the closing Agreement. ii 10. right of use and occupancy Sellers reserve the of the dwelling �� and the house lot, and the use of an access road for a period of one year C ate of the closing of this ;reement, aad Sellers hereby agree to after the d with extended coverage, upon 1 maintain adequate fire and casualty insuran � ear, the improvements, naming Buyeuntil} a r as an insured, as its interest may pp I' remises• !1 Sellers vacate the p 11 1� sell, the fol- 11. Sellers expressly except from this Agreement to items now on the premises: l lowing t (a) TwoChandeliers; i! 1` (b) Shrubbery on house lot; Farm bell, front door -knocker and electrical switch plates. i dt vc his t:snsa�ttiaa sabject to all ;.he tez^as and can 12. Closins.i this .4pxeement shall ts.�e place on July 15, 1973, or as soon there- on of ` ,! -k- t+ • - r Q 'after as Buyer has the approval of Chesterfield County referred f' -event later than August-l5, 1973. 11$ above, but in no }' UTTNESS the following signatures and seals: ii ;i !1 �t It ATTEST: Assistant Secretary , '.i DrVE,tSIPIED DEVL'LOP-HEMT, INC. i to in Paragraph S i f 1 By: J�'` '�i Kenneth 114. Joyner, President -5- (SEAT.) (SEAT.) �i; , • .c < t t � i DORO-IHY ,D . OAKLEiC, his rlii e i SONNY SNEED REALTY CO. REAL ESTATE Pho= 272-7371 8778 Huguenot Rd. RICHMOND, VIRGINIA Zeal Estate Sales Contract W' A -,ree to give. ) payable c< <i �'" se le?:f- r,a� -,n_ nT plus 7..", interes on t;7e un?-)aid 'valance 10 erual annual payments .� rom as of s a y;:lens uue a� s for tile following Pr property: All that certain piece, parcel or lot of land known as_�'r��fT-on GR containing a,,)!? and a-purtenance to the following t provided th` a title is fr free om valid objections (subject to any restrictions now.on the property). Settlement to be made on or about August 15, 1973a papers area, allowing a reasonable time to correct or as soon thereafter as the title can be examined and p p prepared, P any objections reported by the Title Examiner. f the All rents, taxes, and interest to be proratedas othe Cont acdtor/ate Sellertunttlement. The risk of s or damage to until settlement is made said premises by fire or otherwise is assumed by of s n Actual possession subject to lease of present tenant to be given— at-- iMe_ — _ Dollars E"; e _hereby make a deposit of " iy e hurl er O. 00 ) to bind this contract which is to be applied on purchase price or refunded if the title rJ is not good. d seller definite part of this �ontractA or G.I. financing the amen It is further agreed by the purchaser a - ments attached hereto are to be signed and Sonny Sneed is the gent ht The parties to this contract hereby acknowledgeSeller(s)gree a�ree(s)tto pay the said Sonn}aSneedvho for services about the sale of the property sold herein and the ( ) _ D1:11 on the consideration above mentioned. In case rendered the full commissions which ispay wever, the party so d either of the parties hereto defaults, hoseed addition will form a part of same.sign. No verbal agreement is considered a part of this contract, but any a f — WITNESS the following signature(s) and seal(s) at Richmond, Virginia, this day of Jam'' , 19 �L�, hereby accept the above offer this day of 19_e�2, and agree to convey th above property by General Warranty Deed with the usual covenants of title at my (our) DIVERSIFIED UVELGRAWT, 14C' expense. (SEAL) (SEAL) �•� (SEAL) (SEAL) (22� and/or X .)if" s (SAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) Address - ,., Address J �r713f ` . Phone Phone I certify this to be a true copy of the original contract. Broker a 1 T:�.. 113' Al D CUB TT:Sao- (1) Buyer has the right to enter property for soil tests anu other engineerir•g studies, the results of which Wust be satisfactory to th-- buyer; (2) f'z.iblic :rater and sewer must be available in such quantity as to handle anv development projected by buyer; (3) Buyer must -receive- written approval from -the proper. governing body for -any development he might propose; (4) at settlement seller .gill release 4 acres of land free and clear of any lion and 1 Pcre of land there after for each "12,500.00 paid in principal. The seller further agrees to release at any time and enter into any dedication of all land necessary for the construction of roads, streets, alleys, drainage and/or utility easements for orderly ` development of the property. (5) Buyer will have property surveyed by a certified land surveyor at Buyer's expense. Should this survey show more or less acreage than stated in contract then the price shall be adjusted up or down at the rate of $2,200.00 per acre. ,. ..,.,.:.. -.� .., { -x �:.- > .- �--..�,..+.a+�.t,;; .�` ".1:.JAt�,D,a�. �'w'.y ,;�;,.: ,. �i°tik. �:,,+ r ,y�;�:.?+:vS�'>t^''..�:� r »�13t,•,�?-,�rt� •�J'*:fic ^,.,'1'. i e i I N j J II Q C�. MTM r-71". Rp s � { � �s m m .......... 5' ZOO 04'50 "W Alay 6",eq Bridge Ad /530't /o 114,11 S1 AV GOODES BRIDGE 14F0170 PLf'T OF 3.�/ AC. ON �OESBR/06ERD. CHESTERF/ELO COUN7Y, AM7N/A Rob � M. Olonkenshio ZT /lne ZO, 1979 Oerb?l'e►l 61arveyor Riahrnon; Vo. .1 1_.1 • f 4�1�, 1} t�c t _._ s �r."�a _ tU t: !x. ..., _ " i _a ...: „t �1� ,. t t al ]I' j i�r, :S l.(a i.l} i'ct ih - �tL i„ III ej 1 t t Dy a negotiable promissory note secured by a valid first deed �-if trust on the aforedescribed property, said note to bear interest at Six and one-half per Gent (6 1 /2f;'(.') per annum. Principal and interest payments :are to be made in two (2) equal annual installments on the anniversary date of the date. of settlement. i. It is '-tool that T lgi,[ c�tatic!4].aior! at Tiny r'fre or deed T'USt .'lute 11r'I l't,+) f;::' i.i7F?Z1t10iltiu C i "CI';;-E d t1"lUUi �")E:•IaIt,�'. is Xj:i, s 1 I37c' � aT if'!'C'ii, tL:::zi. i.il1S AGREEMENT OF SALE is subject to the aforedescribed property being properly zoned to allow the operation of Buyers' business on said premises. Seller covenants to cooperate in a reasonable manner toward this end and Buyers hereby agree to proceed as diligently as possible at their own cost to obtain any such rezoning as may be: required. 5. The parties further covenant that this AGREEMENT OF SALE is also contingent upon water and sewage being available at said property in such a fashion as to be adequate and suitable for buyers' business. 6. Buyer reserves the right to assign the entire AGREEMENT OF SALE to any Corporation, firm or partnership, but no such assignment shall relieve Buyer of any liability for the perfor mance of the obligation undertaken herein. 7. Possession will be given as of the date of settlement. Settlement will be in the office of Thomas, Jermings and Farley, 227 E. Belt Boulevard, Richmond, Virginia, Attorneys at Law, on or before — ,° 1973P or as soon thereafter as title can be examined and papers prepared, allowing a reasonable time to correct any defects reported by the title examiner. 8. It is understood and agreed that title to the property is to be conveyed by a good and valid General Warranty Deed with usual English Covenants of title for recordation and that title shall be marketable and .free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. 9. Taxes shall be prorated as of the date of settlement. 1G. Tie parties to the AGREEMENT OF SALE represent and warrant each to the other that no agent has acted for or on behalf of either :in bringing about this transaction. 11. This AGREEMENT OF SALE is binding upon the parties hereto, their respective heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors ini interest. There are no understandings, agreements oral or otherwise, . , _ .... :. ,• , ._: , ,i {„ �. r. ., _ _�, �..� .� _ r '': .- t _ �.1. I.P. 1• DN. \de d MULE i CERTIMATE lid. 5417,3 W 1020 e QED LAW sUsw� COOLEY 9�d �0 .s .9�� Od'�•P 2�_. I°45' E"roOM.14- COUNTY of ,CNE5TEF-F•lEt'0 MAP OF . A PARCEL OF LAND COLITAIILM-16 O.GT N3ES MATOMP, 113TIMCT CHESTEWIEL-D COUNTY, VI;GMIA, 3U ME It,, GD o ?i WlEWTE 41 ? LUCY V. HILL SCALE : 1"-40'- 6EIiALI N. MOODY MvE` olO COLOI'IAL HEIGHTS, VA. APNIL 7.831113. d 07 w i- su a. 40- I KIM TAi' LOR RF,A.LTY AI\lD W. Eugene Glenn, Inc. 8611 Midlothian Turnpike Richmond, Virginia 2,3235 Telephone 272-7501 or 320-3680 n � � �?fC' Ji�Z�fC�'�2f.C�L/ c/Cf�•t/,!�.1tc71�" REAL ESTATE SALES CONTRACT I hereby agree to give Sixty Thoiis�tnd and No/100------------------------------ Dollars ($ 00, ()00-00 ) Payable: $ 1 , 00()-00 Cash in Hand $50, 332. 00 Cash at Settlement 8, i;(��;, 00 Existing First" and Second Lein Deed of Trust .Notes to be Assumed ley Purchaser lr R`r Huai frcG��4TF%s.:`rT!� Ss '' 1f JIbVS•�l[,'7 iS ��' .'L!'r^^.f�L'A'%,�►^�T� /�/�'Pc/.C/?, !-�C�t'Cl'�`.'�_SF"/.' Gc/,•C,G. i'JY C'iQ-t'.y .LC'�c' Q.c9G (1iy: ;" p,c �?:1 .:'Cf/•v.3 t'- �'•f /«, 11�.y /C r/ FOR THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY provided the title is free from valid objections. All of a certain parcel of land and the appurtences thereon fronting 100' along the Southern line of U.S. Route 60 in Chesterfield 'County to a depth of 400' between parallel or nearly so lines known as 10813 Midlothian Turnpike, This Contract subject to Purchaser, at his own expense, rezoning the proper- ty to B-3 classification. ii is tinderstm)(1 by hotli parties that to meet the con- tract settlement date appiicictiun fur reziMini? Muat he Oiled prior to the Auut.ist 28 de.3dli'_l� Oti`. 2 4- %> ; .S; cti'C fC%¢)/�c'c�TE n. �Y E+cl�7c-F' .:'_ s i`i=? 7 ':JA %,tl E :Svc C O +�,T/ CN Gi = C�/T/YE •f_' .S �""! C �, / (7C^� .''ifi •c! C %' .y/t Y' .';al' T �ic,�.tf ,' /!• .4 i"FP 4C> N C _ c— Y T u 444 POSSESSION D.�TE: e t t1c Ilx nt Settlement to be at the office of W. EUGENE GLENN, INC., Agents within 0days from date hereof or as soon thereafter as title can be examined and papers prepared allowing a reasonable time to correct any objections reported by the Title Examiner. All rentals, taxes, interests, insurance, etc., to be prorated as of date of settlement. The risk�of loss or damage to -said property by fire or otherwise is assumed by the Seller until settlement is made. Purchaser covenants that this offer of purchase is made after full inspection of the said property and that there are no rel:rv-, uCcti00% or agrvenicuts Haute to him by 11/. FUGF;Nl,' CLENN, INC. or any of its agents, salesmen, or representlttiyes except those contained in this contract, and this offer of purchase is made by said purchaser relying solely upoo his own judgment. Seller agrees to convey the property to Purchaser by General Warranty Deed with English Covenants of 'Title. Subject to restrictive covenants and easements of record. Should either narty to this contract fail to comply with the terms of same, party so defaulting agrees to pay W. EUGENE GLENN, INC., Brokers regular commissions oil the sale.- No verbal agreement is con- sidered a part of the contract, but anv si de I addition shall form a part of same. Purchaser hereby makes a deposit of $ li--- �__ 0 0 _ _ _ to bind this contract to he held by the said Agent in escrow which is to be applied upon purchase price, or refunded only if title is not good, the contengen- cies, if any, are not met, or if this offer is not accepted. This offer mast be accepted within days. WITNESS the following signatures and seals this day of .Z�_'' - 19 IIWE hereby accept the above offer and agree that W. EUGENE GLENN, INC., Agents, has, with sign- ing of this contract by Seller, and Purchaser, earned, and I/WE agree to pay of the purchase d price as commission. 1, fit-� _ _{— -(SEAL) �i=t•��-r�,�-:.�-��-�-.y�'��-- --(SEAL ) SFII.0 Pull �SEN TAI`f f _G_4 r SELLER - ii1RCR /!i ComrnIsston split ->0; 70 address bet,,vee Glenn, Inc. and Kim "1 aylor Rc•,ilt ---- - = ---- ------ -- - --- F-�kcin+fc=/? e r H Z O U J W lL W F- W U M arter ea compan CY COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE P. O. BOX 6482 1804 DABNEY ROAD. RICHMOND. VIRGINIA 23230 Tsr::PRo, �X353-7994 Mr, Michael C. Ritz Director of Planning County of Chesterfield Chesterfield Court House Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Ritz: AUK August 27, 1973 Enclosed find application for rezoning of Wil-Car Company, Inc, property from M-1 to M-2 and the Brickhouse property from Agricultural to M-2. I am enclosing options of the Brickhouse property to Wil-Car, along with options from Wil-Car to the Seaboard Railroad on the Wit -Car property. I am also enclosing an option from Wil-Car to the Seaboard for that portion of the Brickhouse property that the food processor has indicated they want. I would hope that you would treat these options in the strictest conEid6ntial sense because the railroad is acting as the agent for the ultimate user of the property, and we do not desire at this time to make their identity known. It is important that all property be zoned M-2 because there is a possibility that they may take more than 100 acres. Enclosed also is a check for One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for the zoning. Very truly yours, �.. Porter REP:j Encs. rm 00 orter /``dealt Compancy� COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE P. O. BOX 6482 1804 DABNEY ROAD, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23230 TELEPHONE 703/353-7994 117-10 (1) -1- Cato, Mary Watson and Joe 2107 Bast Aubutn Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 117-10 (1) -2- Wood, Claven Armstead 219 - 14th Street. N. E. Washington, D. C. 20002 117-10 (1) -3- Wood, Claven A. 219 - 14th St., N. E. Washington, D. C. 20002 117-10 (1) -4- Lot 5 Bullock, Samuel 6 Catherine 1230 west Hundred Road Chester, Virginia 23831 117-10 (1) -5- Bullock, Samuel & Catherine 1230 W. Hundred Road Chester, Va. 23931 .81 Ac. 34 .70 AC. .i66 Ac. .57 AC, .36 Ac. 117-10 (1) -6m- .73 Ac. Morris, Louis H. A Estelle G. 1220 west Hundred Road Chester, Va, 23831 117-10 (1) -7- .50 Ac. Sidney Jones Estate c% Mrs. Easel Brooks Route 1, Box 119 Colonial Heights, Va. 117-10 (1) -8• .50 Ac. McCoy, L. J. a Ella Mae Route 38 Scx 430A Chester, Va. 23831 rri 117-10 (1) -9- 4.53 Ac. Sharp, Matthew RFD 3, Box 249 Chester, Va. 23821 117-10 (1) -9- 1 Sharpe, Plun M. 5028 R'almsley Blvd. Richmond, Va. 23234 117-10 (1) -10- 107.48 Ac. Pedersen, Paul A. P. O. Box 668 Chester, Va. 23821 117-10 (1) 10-1- 47.52 Ac. Pedersen, Paul A. Davis, Zane G. Route 1, Box 66 Chester, Va. 23821 117-10 (1) -11- Jones, Ruth 0. Route 1, Box 119 Colonial Heights, Va. 23834 117-15 (2) 5.82 Ac. Carden, Allen M. & Bula (Jr.) 524 Old Bermuda Hundred Road Chester, Va. 23831 117-15 (1) -3- 8 Ac. Tallent, Dave Route 3, Box 264 Chester, Va. 23831 117-15 (1) -2- 4 Ac. Vaughn, Curtis B. & Ruth C. 13430 Jefferson Davis Highway Chester, Va. 23821 2. IM 3. 117-14 (1) -2- 6.23 Ac. Bishop, James B. and Jennie F. Route 2, Box 690 Chester, Va. 23821 117-14 (1) -3- 3 Ac. Bishop, James B. and Jennie P. Route 2, Box 690 Chester, Va. 23831 117-14 (1) -4- Shelburn, Eli B. Sr. and Nettie Route 3, Box 262 Chester, Va. 23831 117-14 (1) -5- 3.04 Ac. Pitts, Raymond Earle P. 0. Box 574 Hopewell, Va. 23861 117-14 (1) 5-1 McLaughlin, James L. & Joyce S. 5215 whetstone Rd. Richmond, Va. 23234 117-13 (1) -3- 5.47 Ac. Rice, Phyllis 168-42 127th Avenue Jamaica, New York 11434 117-9 (1) -6- 75.90 Ac. Continental Can Company, Inc. Woodlands Division 106 E. Randolph Rd. Hopewell, Va. 117-9 (1) 5-1 1 6.00 & R/W Richmond Plastics P. 0. Box T 1351 West Hundred Rd. Chester , Va. 23831 1/7 3 //%- //� DSO � /��Gtr,/��.I�✓✓ram )GI . O N) O Lms JALLA RD. k trc4 �° JQJs N), SEP1973 s+ �',� rut �rF3Eti1 CUUNiY p� % For Ofce Use Only: Case No.� 5 0 - S- Zoning �n Vi�ilNl� CL T I 0 N F O R A U S E P E R M I T P A R K A M L E H 0 M E 2 (� � � 4 (NEW AND ENEWAL > " (Following information is to e typed or printed) 1. Name of Applicant: /I c4 cccd (i; /4 (Must be owner & occupant of the Mobile Home 2. Address of Applicant L , `0 7 Y Telephone)?L-- 3 3yy `l- 3. Mailing address Where mobile home will be located 11"r 1t *Magisterial Distric Subd. Name 300M"AWAW� Tax Map No. �U- Lot or Parcel /_Blk. Sec. A map of this property must be attached to this application. This map must be to scale. 4. Name of owner of property on which mobile home will be parked -11S it the applicant is explain.) e owner of the property in question$ 5. If mobile home will remain unoccupied, explain 6. Time requested for mobile home to remain at site (use permit granted for a maximum of two years only.) :2. months years 7. Size and type of mobile home to be parked on the above noted property. Make .. ,, ,,,, Model 11�fr Colors Pi/ Width Length ' D No. of Bedrooms No. of Bathrooms 8. Source of water supply �� 1 Method of sewage disposal (D LA Information obtainable from the office of the County Assessor. (Room 213) 9. Information, addresses, and signatures of all property owners,occupants who are adjacent to the parcel on which the mobile home be located must be provided in the spaces below. We, the undersigned owners and occupants of the adjacent property to the property on which a mobile home is proposed to be located, hereby certify that we do or do not object to the granting of a Use Permit to park a mobile home on the property- described in thi6 petition. Information available from the office of the County Assessor (Room. 2133). Name (Drint ,r Owner ( ) Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. "/ V Block No. Lot or Parcel No. Address: Check Otfe Onl I do object I do not object Signature: Name (print �rJ�7i �//r° Owner ( ) Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. Block No. Lot or rcel No. Address: f� ✓�/ C,l/�//r'�� 'Y-J �. I do object ( t. ) Signature: Name (pr Tax Map Address: Check One Onl I do not obj t ( int ,.J Owner ( ) Occupant ( } NoNo. Lor or Parcel No._^" /Uc/ �J z _t_c Check One Only I do object I do not object Signature: dditional spaces on back of page. (2) 5 I Name (print) ,y-xic- Tax Map . ��' Address: ✓ � _Owner No -IV Lot �� ( ) Occupant or Parcel No. / / Z�4 ✓ e �f CVNoBlock �--- f/ Check One Only I do object ( l) Signature: I do not object ( Name (print) Owner ( ) Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. Address: I do object Signature: Name (print) Block No. Lot or Parcel No. Check One Only I do not object Owner ( ) Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. Block No. Lot or Parcel No. Address: Check One Only I do object ( ) Signature: I do not object ( ) 1 Name (print) Owner ( ) Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. Block No. Lot or Parcel No. Address: I do object Check One Only I do not object Signature: - (3) 10. THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE SUM OF FORTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($45.00) TO BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION TO ASSIST IN DEFRAYING THE COST OF PROCESSING THE SAME. A) Check or money order must be made payable to: Treasurer, Courty of Chesterfi-ld B) Application fee ($45.00) is not refundable. 11. The Chesterfield County Health Department must make an inspection of the proposed or existing mobile home location site (both new & renewal). It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the Health Department and make an appointment for this inspection (telephone 748-13a8). The inspection form must be attached to this application. 12. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING UNLESS OR UNTIL: A) All questions have been answered — B) Location map or plat is attached C) Health Department inspection form attached D) Application is signed and notarized. THE APPLICANT AND/OR;HIS AGENT MUST BE PRESENT AT THE BOARD HEARING. I/We hereby certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any exhibits transmitted herewith are true. Applicant's Signature Subscribed and sworn to befo e me this 1c, day of My Commission expires /.S ( Not ary Public) (Page 4) 1975. M CHESTERFIELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMTT CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 SUBJECT: Inspection for Trailer r,-enewal Permit Mr? County Planner Ppplicant Address 6S7 Location of Trailer Dat Phone 97 r,n inspection of the sewage disposal system and the environment of the above trailer site was made by the undersigned, this date. The following report is submitted, /_V Health Department finds no environmental health hazard. /7 r,n environmental health hazard does exist, as described below, therefore, the Health Department recommends corrective action prior to renewal of permit. /% Recommend denial of renewal for the following reasons. /% Other Remarks V 'A San ta�n PhgAq/! 748l S, Jr Dis�!Rv t ginal to ��e nr Copy to File f SEr1973 ?' r, RECEIVED. PLANNING DEFT. `d CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ' VIRGINIA "6c A P P L I C A O N s~T A��6 For Ofce Use Only: *40 Case No. 73 S 0, / Zoning k- ---) — �4---14- -�3(0 C?/q F O R A U S E P E R M I T T O P A R M 0 B I L E H 0 M E (NE AND RENEWAL) (Following infor ion is to be typed or printed) 0 1. Name of Applicant: VII_A (Must be 2. Address of Applicant Z. 3. Mailing address where mo PY_ ,I, n /. hF we, //S -k r & occupant of the Mobile Home ea h c Telephone�'� le home will be located_,, . ---30K*Magister al District' Tax Map No� Subd. Name Lot or Parcell,3 Blk. Sec. A map of this property must be attached to this application. This map must be to scale. 4. Name of owner of property on which mobile home will be parked h-la �- V F 1� dC-0 If the appl' ant is not the owner of the property in question, explain. ) tJ p ,o /,' C g Ls -k a r h e� �' h -- 5. If mobile home will remain unoccupied, explain 6. Time requested for mobile home to remain at site (use permit granted for a maximum of two years only.) 0)�-- months years 7. Size and type of mobile home to be parked on the above noted property. Make _[ZL CA& Model Color"6CA[Widtha� Length_ No. of Bedrooms__j,No. of Bathrooms 8. Source of water supply &V * A/A Method of sewage disposal /Vfi4. �5•� Information obtainable from the office of the County Assessor. (Room 213) n M 9. Information, addresses,, and signatures of all property owners,occupants who are adjacent to the parcel on which the mobile home be located must be provided in the spaces below. We, the undersigned owners and occupants of the adjacent property to the property on which a mobile home is proposed to be located, hereby certify that we do or do not object to the granting of a Use Permit to park a mobile home on the propert�.T described in this petition. Information available from the office of the County Assessor (Room 213). JName (print) e-IC1, ��/"� Owner ( ) Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. Block No.�6 Lot or Pare-' No. Address` Check One Only I do object I do not ob ct Signature: f Name (print) -7x}- Owner ( ) Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. V Block No. 15 Lot or Parcel No. t/ Address �i'�w 7 C'/mil ti : %G Check One Only I do object Signature: I do not object Name (print) Owner ( ) Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. �/L —/V Block No. �� Low or Parcel No. -�==1 Address: VZ)r U Check One Only ' I do object I do not o ect Signature: ? Additional spaces on back of page (2) Name (print) Tax Map No Address: I do object Signature: 9 Block No. 6 Check' One Only M Owner ( ) Occupant ( ) Lot r Parcel No.--�--`_' I do not object Name (print) Owner ( ) Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. Block No. Lot or Parcel No. Address: Check One Only I do object I do not object Signature: Name (print) Owner ( ) Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. Block No. Lot or Parcel No. Address: Check One Only I do object Signature: I do not object Name (print) Owner ( ) Occupant ( ) Tax Map No. Block No.Lot or Parcel No. Address: Check One Only I do object ( ) I do not object Signature: (3) 10. THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE SUM OF FORTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($45.00) TO BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION TO ASSIST IN DEFRAYING THE COST OF PROCESSING THE SX11E. A) Check or money order must be made payable to: Treasurer, Courty of Chesterfi-ld B) Application fee ($45.00) is not refundable. 11. The Chesterfield County Health Department must make an inspection of the proposed or existing mobile home location site (both new & renewal). It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the Health Department and make an appointment for this inspection (telephone 748-1308). The inspection form must be attached to this application. 12. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING UNLESS OR UNTIL: A) All questions have been answered B) Location map or plat is attached C) Health Department inspection form attached D) Application is signed and notarized. THE APPLICANT AND/OR HIS AGENT MUST PE PRESENT AT THE BOARD HEARING. I/We hereby certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any exhibits transmitted herewith are true. t Appl' rt's Signature Subscribed and sworn to bef re me this_14_day of y �9u Jq� My Commission expires S 17 (Notary Public (Page 4) LIM n COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD STREET NAME CHANGE RECOMMENDATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TO: Board of Supervisors: It is recommended that State Route 623 be named Dry Creek Road. 10/10173 1A1Ps. fa�tor Date Recommended By Approved By n n COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD STREET NAME CHANGE RECOMMENDATION TO: Board of Supervisors: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT It is recommended that State Route 815 be named Big Oak Lane. te�/ Date VA YS Creel Recommended By Approved By LN9 M COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD STREET NAME CHANGE. RECOMMENDATION TO: Board of Supervisors: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT It is recommended that a portion of Route 620 be named Golf Course Road. 101%0_l73 Date ne Recommended By Approved By COLONIAL HEIGHTS. VIRGINIA 23834 ALLEN M. PERKINS, JR. CITY MANAGER October 10, 1973 Mr. David H. Welchons, Assistant County Engineer County of Chesterfield Chesterfield Court House Chesterfield, Virginia RE: Sewer Service Dupuy Area Dear Mr. Welchons: (8041 526-4711 Pursuant to your letter of October 2, 1973, this is to officially inform you that City Council at their regular meet- ing of October 9, 1973, by motion unanimously adopted your re- quest to connect 55 homes as indicated by your drawings and the Dupuy Elementary School into our sewer system that will flow into our Charlotte Avenue line. It will be up to the County, of course, to make all nec- essary tie-ins and this office will be back in contact with you to work out details and extend the present contract to include these 55 homes and the elementary school. Please keep us advised as to progress your office is making and if you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. With warmest wishes, I am Sin erely, 7 � Allen M. Perkins , City Manager AMP: pm CC: Mr. Mel Burnett, County Secretary -- Mr. R. A. Painter, County Engineer (rq*'W--R Mr. E. Merlin O'Neill, Sr., SupervisorGCT 1973 ECEIVD OF SO SM T�HU C�l1Y 4 , . OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD COUNTY LANDFILL Operational plan for Chesterfield County Landfill presently in operation on the Bon Air School for Girls property and the proposed expansion thereof. 1. Maintain the roadway (Route 344 extended) from Route 718 and the access road to the present landfill site. 2. Extend an all-weather access road to the proposed expansion areas as shown on the attached site plan. 3. Complete the area presently being used at the same time open a 50' wide trench in the area of a ravine adjoining the present site on the north to a depth the soil conditions will allow leaving at least 2' of undisturbed earth above the ground water table. This trench should begin along the new southern boundary of the sanitary landfill and extend in a South Easterly direction for a distance Of 800' +. The progressive slope trench method shall be used. The unloading of solid waste must be controlled and restricted to an area where the material can be easily incorporated into the working face with the on site equipment. The working face shall be kept as small as practicable. All trenches shall terminate at least 100' from any surface water. 4. When the first trench is nearly filled, a second trench may be opened on the north side of No. 1 trench, leaving 6' of undisturbed earth between the trench walls. in Paragraph Three above. Progress should then be as described 5. All future trenches should be located, opened and filled and covered in the same manner as previously described. 6. A 50' fire break shall be maintained between all trenches and the nearest wooded areas. 7. The entire operation shall comply with the rules and regulations as promulgated by the State Board of Health under the supervision of the Bureau of Solid Waste and Vector Control, Virginia State Department of Health. This plan presented and approved by the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors on the zof� day of ®G er 19'13 with an approved copy submitted to the Bureau of Solid Waste and Vector Control with a completed application for a permit to operate a sanitary landfill. Chairman, Koarolf Supervisors Chesterfield County Executive Secretary Chesterfield County IVESTOCK AND POULTRY CIAIA INVESTIGATION REPORT DATE s' 7:3 I, Warden R,AI.,. to IS on this date investigated the claim of M �- -r-ag k J;kt/.,n tli : c ��,�� Q address _tT j2= 4-srs&l-t.0 for % cva 00 r no. Description (kind, age, weig t which occurred on 1973 in Chesterfield County. I estimate value of $ d °o each, total value $ �a• ° Authority _ -S40A" 1)"PG i,A `,--q§L- _ -De_Do�drn n�k c(4 14u.1` e I (4311, did not) witness the actual maiming) of the animals claimed. The guilty (dog, d g) (have, INNUMmsrr) been (4agglifft, killed) and are described as follows: A to c -' .,. , 4'k2 ,o tA*, ct 4 Lj n P-- Damag(r'e was done in theV( following manner: -��i q �� 04 4 et h co n [l e , n .. e� _ •• 1—� e : N . As a result of maiming,/ of the total claimed above were destroyed by the owner, or by me at the owner's request. Following are witnesses: awnOr ld)0.T lztkQ-CQ I have investigated this claim as thoroughly as possible. I (have, �.) viewed the remains of the animals claimed. I (have, k===W viewed the area where said animals were attacked along with other physical evidence and I (Dave, questioned available witnesses. Respectfully, CARLTON, TAYLOR & CLARK C 206 EAST CARY STREET • RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219 ARCHITECTS PHONE 648-0171 E. TUCKER CARLTON, AIA WAYNE E. TAYLOR, AIA ROBERT H. CLARK, AIA CSI Mr. M. W. Burnett Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Date 26 September 1973 Project Office Building addition Reference ?Q99' A By rneans indicated below, we are sending: / '. 11 v Prints Tracings 2 copies Other Owner -Architect Agreement Please take the following action: X Check for approval or comments. X Return 1 copy Retain for your records Remarks: By way of: X First Class Our Messenger Printer Special Delivery Parcel Post Your Messenger Bus Special Handling Other 7 Robert H. Clark, AIA, for CARLTON, TAY LOR & CLARK RHC / np M M THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS AIA Document B131 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect on a basis of a PERCENTAGE OF CONSTRUCTION COST THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES; CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED WITH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION AGREEMENT made this 2Oth day of September in the year of Nineteen Hundred and Seventy-three BETWEEN The County of Chesterfield, Commonwealth of Virginia, the Owner, and Carlton, Taylor & Clark, Architects, the Architect. It is the intention of the Owner to erect an addition to the existing County Office Building located at Chesterfield Court House, which addition is to include an Emergency Operating Center meeting DOD requirements and additional admini- strative and operational office spaces to such number of stories as may be finally determined, as well as certain alterations and deletions to the existing building hereinafter referred to as the Project. The Owner and the Architect agree as set forth below. AIA DOCUMENT 9131 • OWNER -ARCHITECT AGREEMENT (PERCENTAGE) • APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIA® © 1970 • THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D. C. 20006 M M I. THE ARCHITECT shall provide professional services for the Project in accordance with the Terms and Conditions of this Agreement. H. THE OWNER shall compensate the Architect, in accordance with the Terms and Conditions of this Agreement, as follows: a. FOR THE ARCHITECT'S BASIC SERVICES, as described in Paragraph 1.1, Basic Compensation computed at the following percentages of the Construction Cost, as defined in Article 3, for portions of the Project to be awarded under A Single Stipulated Sum Contract at rate of Six per cent ( 6 %) Separate Stipulated Sum Contracts per cent ( %) A Single Cost Plus Fee Contract per cent ( %) Separate Cost Plus Fee Contracts per cent ( %) AN INITIAL PAYMENT of - 0 - dollars ($ - 0 - ) shall be made upon the execution of this Agreement and credited to the Owner's account. No initial payment is required under this Agreement. b. FOR THE ARCHITECT'S ADDITIONAL SERVICES, as described in Paragraph 1.3, compensation computed as follows: Principals' time at the fixed rate of **Twenty-five** dollars ($ 25.00 ) per hour. For the purposes of this Agreement, the Principals are: Wayne E. Taylor Robert H. Clark Employees' time computed at a multiple of Two point Seventy -Five( 2.75 ) times the employees' Direct Personnel Expense as defined in Article 4. Additional services of professional consultants engaged for the normal structural, mechanical and electrical engineering services at a multiple of Two point Seventy-five ( 2.75 ) times the amount billed to the. Architect for such additional services. Services of other professional consultants at a multiple of Two point Seventy-five ( 2.75 ) times the amount billed to the Architect for such services. The rates and multiples set forth in this Paragraph IIb will be subject to renegotiation if the services covered by this Agreement have not been completed within Twelve ( 12 ) months of the date hereof. c. FOR THE ARCHITECT'S REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES, amounts expended as defined in Article 5. d. THE TIMES AND FURTHER CONDITIONS OF PAYMENT shall be as described in Article 6. AIA DOCUMENT B131 • OWNER -ARCHITECT AGREEMENT (PERCENTAGE) • APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIA® © 1970 • THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D. C. 20006 2 n M TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ARCHITECT ARTICLE 1 ARCHITECT'S SERVICES 1.1 BASIC SERVICES The Architect's Basic Services consist of the five phases described below and include normal struc- tural, mechanical and electrical engineering services. SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE 1.1.1 The Architect shall consult with the Owner to as- certain the requirements of the Project and shall confirm such requirements to the Owner. 1.1.2 The Architect shall prepare Schematic Design Studies consisting of drawings and other documents illus- trating the scale and relationship of Project components for approval by the Owner. 1.1.3 The Architect shall submit to the Owner a State- ment of Probable Construction Cost based on current area, volume or other unit costs. 1. 1 .3A See Article 14. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1.1.4 The Architect shall prepare from the approved Schematic Design Studies, for approval by the Owner, the Design Development Documents consisting of drawings and other documents to fix and describe the size and character of the entire Project as to structural, mechani- cal and electrical systems, materials and such other essen- tials as may be appropriate. 1.1.5 The Architect shall submit to the Owner a further Statement of Probable Construction Cost. 1.1.5A See Article 14. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE 1.1.6 The Architect shall prepare from the approved De- sign Development Documents, for approval by the Own- er, Working Drawings and Specifications setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the entire Project including the necessary bidding information, and shall assist in the preparation of bidding forms, the Con- ditions of the Contract, and the form of Agreement be- tween the Owner and the Contractor. 1.1.7 The Architect shall advise the Owner of any ad- justments to previous Statements of Probable Construction Cost indicated by changes in requirements or general market conditions. file 1.1.8 The Architect shall assist-t-ie-0vwner-4-�-fling the required documents for the approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. BIDDING OR NEGOTIATION PHASE 1.1.9 The Architect, following the Owner's approval of the Construction Documents and of the latest Statement of Probable Construction Cost, shall assist the Owner in obtaining bids or negotiated proposals, and in awarding and preparing construction contracts. CONSTRUCTION PHASE —ADMINISTRATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 1.1.10 The Construction Phase will commence with the award of the Construction Contract and will terminate when the final Certificate for Payment is issued to the Owner. 1.1.11 The Architect shall provide Administration of the Construction Contract as set forth in Articles 1 through 14 inclusive of the latest edition of AIA Document A201, Gen- eral Conditions of the Contract for Construction, and the extent of his duties and responsibilities and the limitations of his authority as assigned thereunder shall not be modi- fied without his written consent. See Article 14. 1.1.12 The Architect, as the representative of the Owner during the Construction Phase, shall advise and consult with the Owner and all of the Owner's instructions to the Contractor shall be issued through the Architect. The Architect shall have authority to act on behalf of the Owner to the extent provided in the General Conditions unless otherwise modified in writing. 1.1.13 The Architect shall at all times have access to the Work wherever it is in preparation or progress. 1.1.14 The Architect shall make periodic visits to the site to familiarize himself generally with the progress and quality of the Work and to determine in general if the Work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Doc- uments. On the basis of his on -site observations as an architect, he shall endeavor to guard the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the Work of the Contractor. The Architect shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on -site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. The Architect shall not be respon- sible for construction means, methods, techniques, se- quences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work, and he shall not be responsible for the Contractor's failure to carry out the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 1.1.15 Based on such observations at the site and on the Contractor's Applications for Payment, the Architect shall determine the amount owing to the Contractor and shall issue Certificates for Payment in such amounts. The is- suance of a Certificate for Payment shall constitute a rep- resentation by the Architect to the Owner, based on the Architect's observations at the site as provided in Sub- paragraph 1.1.14 and on the data comprising the Appli- cation for Payment, that the Work has progressed to the point indicated; that to the best of the Architect's knowl- edge, information and belief, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of the Work for conformance with the Con- tract Documents upon Substantial Completion, to the re- sults of any subsequent tests required by the Contract Doc- AIA DOCUMENT B131 • OWNER -ARCHITECT AGREEMENT (PERCENTAGE) • APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIA® © 1970 • THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D. C. 20006 rM M M during the construction process, based on marked -up prints, drawings and other data furnished by the Contractor to the Architect. 1.3.16 Providing extensive assistance in the utilization of any equipment or system such as initial start-up or test- ing, adjusting and balancing, preparation of operating and maintenance manuals, training personnel for operation and maintenance, and consultation during operation. 1.3.17 Providing Contract Administration and observa- tion of construction after the Construction Contract Time has been exceeded or extended by more than 3 days through no fault of the Architect. bU 1.3.18 Providing services after issuance to the Owner of the final Certificate for Payment. 1.3.19 Preparing to serve or serving as an expert witness in connection with any public hearing, arbitration proceed- ing or legal proceeding. 1.3.20 Providing services of professional consultants for other than the normal structural, mechanical and electri- cal engineering services for the Project. 1.3.21 Providing any other services not otherwise in- cluded in this Agreement or not customarily furnished in accordance with generally accepted architectural practice. ARTICLE 2 THE OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 The Owner shall provide full information regarding his requirements for the Project. 2.2 The Owner shall designate, when necessary, a rep- resentative authorized to act in his behalf with respect to the Project. The Owner or his representative shall exam- ine documents submitted by the Architect and shall render decisions pertaining thereto promptly, to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of the Architect's work. 2.3 The Owner shall furnish a certified land survey of the site giving, as applicable, grades and lines of streets, alleys, pavements and adjoining property; rights -of -way, restric- tions, easements, encroachments, zoning, deed restrictions, boundaries and contours of the site; locations, dimensions and complete data pertaining to existing buildings, other improvements and trees; and full information concerning available service and utility lines both public and private, above and below grade, including inverts and depths. 2.4 The Owner shall furnish the services of a soils engi- neer or other consultant when such services are deemed necessary by the Architect, including reports, test borings, test pits, soil bearing values, percolation tests, air and water pollution tests, ground corrosion and resistivity tests and other necessary operations for determining subsoil, air and water conditions, with appropriate professional interpretations thereof. 2.5 The Owner shall furnish structural, mechanical, chemical and other laboratory tests, inspections and reports as required by law or the Contract Documents. 2.6 The Owner shall furnish such legal, accounting, and insurance counselling services as may be necessary for the Project, and such auditing services as he may require to ascertain how or for what purposes the Contractor has used the moneys paid to him under the Construction Contract. 2.7 The services, information, surveys and reports re- quired by Paragraphs 2.3 through 2.6 inclusive shall be furnished at the Owner's expense, and the Architect shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness thereof. 2.8 If the Owner observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, he shall give prompt writ- ten notice thereof to the Architect. 2.9 The Owner shall furnish information required of him as expeditiously as necessary for the orderly progress of the Work. ARTICLE 3 CONSTRUCTION COST 3.1 The Construction Cost to be used as the basis for determining the Architect's Basic Compensation shall be the total cost or estimated cost to the Owner of all Work designed or specified by the Architect, which shall be determined as follows, with precedence in the order listed: 3.1.1 For completed construction, the total cost of all such Work; 3.1.2 For Work not constructed, (1) the lowest bona fide bid received from a qualified bidder for any or all of such Work, or (2) if the Work is not bid, the bona fide nego- tiated proposal submitted for any or all of such Work; or 3.1.3 For Work for which no such bid or proposal is received, (1) the latest Detailed Estimate of Construction Cost if one is available, or (2) the latest Statement of Probable Construction Cost. 3.2 Construction Cost does not include the compensa- tion of the Architect and consultants, the cost of the land, rights -of -way, or other costs which are the responsibility of the Owner as provided in Paragraphs 2.3 through 2.6 inclusive. 3.3 Labor furnished by the Owner for the Project shall be included in the Construction Cost at current market rates including a reasonable allowance for overhead and profit. Materials and equipment furnished by the Owner shall be included at current market prices, except that used materials and equipment shall be included as if pur- chased new for the Project. 3.4 Statements of Probable Construction Cost and De- tailed Cost Estimates prepared by the Architect represent his best judgment as a design professional familiar with the construction industry. It is recognized, however, that neither the Architect nor the Owner has any control over the cost of labor, materials or equipment, over the con- tractors' methods of determining bid prices, or over com- petitive bidding or market conditions. Accordingly, the Architect cannot and'does not guarantee that bids will not vary from any Statement of Probable Construction Cost or other cost estimate prepared by him. AIA DOCUMENT B131 • OWNER -ARCHITECT AGREEMENT (PERCENTAGE) • APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIA® © 1970 • THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D. C. 20006 M M and shall be available to the Owner or his authorized representative at mutually convenient times. ARTICLE 8 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven days' written notice should the other party fail substantially to perform in accordance with its terms through no fault of the other. In the event of termination due to the fault of others than the Architect, the Archi- tect shall be paid his compensation for services per- formed to termination date, including Reimbursable Ex- penses then due and all terminal expenses. ARTICLE 9 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS Drawings and Specifications as instruments of service are and shall remain the property of the Architect whether the Project for which they are made is executed or not. They are not to be used by the Owner on other projects or extensions to this Project except by agreement in writ- ing and with appropriate compensation to the Architect. ARTICLE 10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS The Owner and the Architect each binds himself, his partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all covenants of this Agreement. Neither the Owner nor the Architect shall assign, sublet or transfer his interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. ARTICLE 11 ARBITRATION 11.1 All claims, disputes and other matters in question arising out of, or relating to, this Agreement or the breach thereof shall be decided by arbitration in accord- ance with the Construction Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association then obtaining un- less the parties mutually agree otherwise. This agreement to arbitrate shall be specifically enforceable under the prevailing arbitration law. 11.2 Notice of the demand for arbitration shall be filed in writing with the other party to this Agreement and with the American Arbitration Association. The demand shall be made within a reasonable time after the claim, dispute or other matter in question has arisen. In no event shall the demand for arbitration be made after the date when institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such claim, dispute or other matter in question would be barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 11.3 The award rendered by the arbitrators shall be final, and judgment may be entered upon it in accordance with applicable law in any court having jurisdiction thereof. ARTICLE 12 EXTENT OF AGREEMENT This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Owner and the Architect and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both Owner and Architect. ARTICLE 13 GOVERNING LAW Unless otherwise specified, this Agreement shall be gov- erned by the law of the principal place of business of the Architect. AIA DOCUMENT B131 • OWNER -ARCHITECT AGREEMENT (PERCENTAGE) • APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIA® © 1970 • THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D. C. 20006 `40 ARTICLE 14. ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS 14. 1 The Architect agrees to prepare and file the necessary application documents, with the Owner's assistance where applicable, for such Federal and State funding as may be applicable for the Emergency Operating Center portion of the Project, including such filing applicable at each stage of the Basic Services. 14.2 If applicable, the Federal Supplementary General Conditions appended to AIA Document A-201, shall be appended. 14.3 Travel and living expenses between the Architect's office and the Project site are not reimbursable. Travel and living expenses within the generally pro- scribed Richmond Metropolitan Area are not reimbursable. 14.4 It is agreed that any services falling within the scope of Section 1 .3, Additional Services, will be agreed upon by both parties prior to actual performance. This Agreement executed the day and year first written above. OWNER County of Chesterfield By Title ARCHITECT Carlton, Taylor & Clark AIA DOCUMENT B131 - OWNER -ARCHITECT AGREEMENT (PERCENTAGE) - APRIL 1970 EDITION - AIA8 © 1970 - THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D. C. 20006 8 RHC/ms In Two Counterparts THE BOARD OF THE APPOMATTOX RIVER WATER AUTHORITY Fred J. Swearingen, Chairman City of Colonial Heights, Virginia Robert Ritchie, Jr. Vice -Chairman County of Dinwiddie, Virginia Melvin W. Burnett County of Chesterfield, Virginia GENERAL COUNSEL Frank L. Wyche Prince George, Virginia Richard E. Bain Secretary -Treasurer County of Prince George, Virginia Lewis Z. Johnson, Jr. City of Petersburg, Virginia AUTHORITY STAFF Llewellyn F. Rose Manager TRUSTEE CONSULTING ENGINEERS Wiley & Wilson Lynchburg, Virginia United Virginia Bank/State Planters Richmond, Virginia TABLE OF CONTENTS A June 30, 1973 PAGE THE REPORT OPINION 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Construction Fund - Balance Sheet - Exhibit "A" 3 Construction Fund - Statement of Fund Transactions - Exhibit "B" 4 Operating Fund - Statement of Fund Transactions - Exhibit "C" 5 Debt Service Fund - Statement of Fund Transactions - Exhibit "D" 6 Water Revenue Fund - Statement of Fund Transactions - Exhibit "E" 8 Replacement Fund - Statement of Fund Transactions - Exhibit "F" 11 Bond Redemption Fund - Statement of Fund Transactions - Exhibit "G" 13 Investment in Water System Plant and Equipment - Exhibit "H" 15 Bonded Debt - Exhibit "I" 17 SCHEDULES Construction Fund - Statement of Cash Receipts and Disbursements - Schedule 1 18 Operating Fund - Expenditures - Schedule 2 19 Investments - Schedule 3 22 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Insurance in Force - Schedule 4 23 COMMENTS 24 MITCHELL, WIGGINS & COMPANY CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 206 PETERSBURG MUTUAL BUILDING PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA 23803 I� 733-5566 AREA CODE 703 Appomattox River Water Authority Petersburg Virginia We have examined the financial statements of the Appomattox River Water Authority, as listed in the foregoing table of contents, for the year ended June 30, 1973• Our examination was made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, and accordingly included such auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. The scope of our examination was sufficient to include all auditing �r requirements set forth in the Resolution dated as of November 4, ,t 19643 pertaining to the issuance of water revenue bonds, and consti- tuting a contract between the Appomattox River Water Authority and United Virginia Bank/State Planters, Richmond, Virginia, Trustee, By the authority of Section 508 of this Resolution, we are girl permitted to rely on reports of funds held by the Trustee, furnished mil by the Trustee, without independent audit thereof. In our opinion, the statements listed in the foregoing table of contents present fairly the financial condition of the Funds of the Appomattox River Water Authority at June 303 1973, and of the 2 transactions and cash receipts and disbursements for the period then ended, in accordance with generally accepted principles of accounting applied on a basis consistent with that of the preceding year. Further, it is our opinion that the Authority and the Trustee have faithfully performed their duties in accordance with the provisions of the subject Resolution. Certified Public Accountants August 20, 1973 3 -4 CONSTRUCTION FUND B A L A N C E S H E E T June 30, 1973 A S S E T S Cash - Trustee's principal account (Schedule 1) Investments (Schedule 3) TOTAL ASSETS FUND BALANCE - UNEXPENDED FUNDS - June 30, 1973 (Exhibit B EXHIBIT "A" $505471 59 665 72 6I 720 43 64 720 43 NOTE 1 - At January 1, 1968, the water system construction was completed to the extent necessary to provide water supply service to the participating political subdivisions. All administrative and general expenses incurred by the Authority prior to that date were paid from the Construc- tion Fund, and subsequent to January 1, 1968, such expendi- tures are regarded as Operating Fund expenditures. NOTE 2 - While there were no major contracts outstanding on which work was uncompleted at June 30, 1973, the Authority has approved the installation of an aeration system, with the estimated cost of $4o, 000.00 to $50,000.00 to be paid from the Construction Fund. "Completion date" as contemplated in Section 507 of the Resolution (pertaining to the disposition of any balance in the Construction Fund) had not been determined at June 30, 1973• 4 CONSTRUCTION FUND STATEMENT OF FUND TRANSACTIONS For the year ended June 30 1973 UNEXPENDED FUNDS - July 1, 1972 ADD: Earnings received on investments Earnings accrued on investments: June 30, 1972 June 30, 1973 UNEXPENDED FUNDS - June 30, 1973 (Exhibit "A") EXHIBIT "B" $61 802 31 $ 2 613 80 ( 313 60) 617 92 2 918 12 $64 72o 43 OPERATING FUND 5 STATEMENT OF FUND TRANSACTIONS For the year ended June 30, 1973 FUND BALANCE - July 1, 1972 ADD: Cash transfers from Water Revenue Fund (Exhibit "E") Due from Water Revenue Fund: June 30, 1972 June 30, 1973 TOTAL AVAILABLE DEDUCT: Operating expenditures (Schedule 2) +r Reimbursement of Operating Fund expenditures FUND BALANCE - June 30, 1973 FUND BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 19733 REPRESENTED BY: Cash - Authority's Operating Fund account Cash - Petty fund Due from Water Revenue Fund (Distribution of income) (Exhibit "E") TOTAL ASSETS EXHIBIT "C" $ 67 990 19 $243 701 19 ( 12 150 09) 248 851 41 $316 841 6o $254 526 55 126 72 254 653 27 $ 62 188 33 $ 64 453 97 53 4 12 150 09 $ 76 653 59 Less: Accounts payable $ 9 407 6o Accrued payroll taxes 1 656 ?9 Unremitted taxes withheld 3 400 87 14 465 26 FUND BALANCE 62 188 33 NOTE - The excess of actual operating fund expenditures over the budgeted amount is primarily attributable to the increased cost' of chemicals resulting from unusual problems in the quality of the raw water supply, and compensation paid plant operators because of difficulties encountered in filling personnel re- quirements under standards imposed by legislation of the General Assembly. Approved modifications of the system will significantly reduce the quantity of chemicals used and related costs. Expenditures in excess of the budgeted amount permit the declaration of all bonds outstanding to be due and payable im- mediately. However, the normal remedial action for such event of default is to provide, in the Debt Service Fund, Replace- ment Fund, or Bond Redemption Fund, sufficient moneys to pay such matured bonds and interest as are due without acceler- ation of the terms. The funds required to pay all matured bonds and accrued interest were held in tte Debt Service Fund at June 30, 1973. vow 6 DEBT SERVICE FUND STATEMENT OF FUND TRANSACTIONS For the year ended June 30, 1973 EXHIBIT "D" PAGE 1 �. PRINCIPAL Reserve for interest and principal on $334 342 50 water revenue bonds - July 1, 1972 Add: Transfers from Water Revenue Fund 4o4 455 00 TOTAL AVAILABLE - Principal $738 797 50 Deduct: Interest paid $290 467 50 Principal amount of bonds paid October 1, 1972 115 000 00 66o Transfer to Bond Redemption Fund 2 00 Accrued interest payable: ( 73 785 00) June 30, 1972 June 30, 1973 71 638 75 TOTAL DEDUCTIONS - Principal $405 981 25 Reserve water for interest and principal on revenue bonds - June 30, 1973 $332 816 25 INCOME Revenue: Earnings received on investments $ 12 981 65 Earnings accrued on investments: June 30, 1972 ( 2 206 18) June 30, 1973 4 532 73 TOTAL AVAILABLE - Income $ 15 308 20 Deduct: Transfers of earnings received on investments to Water Revenue Fund $ 12 981 65 Due to Water Revenue Fund for accrued earnings on investments: June 30, 1972 ( 2 206 18) June 30, 1973 4 532 73 TOTAL DEDUCTIONS - Income $ 15 308 20 DEBT SERVICE FUND 7 STATEMENT OF FUND TRANSACTIONS (Continued) _BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 1973 REPRESENTED BY Cash - Trustee's princi al account Investments (Schedule 3� Amortized discount on investments transferred to income TOTAL ASSETS Less: Liabilities: EXHIBIT "D" PAGE 2 PRINCIPAL INCOME $403 868 67 $ - ( 4 532 73) 4 532 73 $4o4 455 00 $ 4 532 73 Accrued interest on bonds payable 71 638 75 Due to Water Revenue Fund - 4 532 73 RESERVE FOR INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL ON WATER REVENUE BONDS $332 816 25 $ - NOTE: The required reserve for interest and principal on water revenue bonds at June 30, 1973, consists of: Interest due October 1, 1973 and April 1, 1974 $212 816 25 Principal due October 1, 1973 120 000 00 TOTAL $332 816 25 'fir *4d 8 WATER REVENUE FUND STATEMENT OF FUND TRANSACTIONS For the year ended June 30, 1973 EXHIBIT "E" REVENUE Water service charges collected $677 913 49 Water service charges receivable: June 30, 1972 ( 177 288 78) June 30, 1973 185 838 10 Total revenue $686 462 81 NO NREVE NUE Earnings on investments of Debt Service 12 981 65 Fund transferred Earnings on investments of Replacement funds transferred 5 905 78 Earnings accrued on investments of Debt Service and Replacement Funds: 2 550 93) June 30, 1972 ( 4 829 25 June 30, 1973 Retransfers from Replacement Fund 142 169 83 Reimbursement of Replacement Fund 828 00 expenditures Reimbursement of Operating Fund expenditures 292 02 TOTAL AVAILABLE $850 918 41 TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS Operating Fund Debt Service Fund Replacement Fund Redemption Fund Total transfers DUE TO OTHER FUNDS Operating Fund: June 30, 1972 June 303 1973 Replacement Fund: June 30, 1972 June 30, 1973 Bond Redemption Fund: June 30, 1972 June 30, 1973 TOTAL DEDUCTIONS $243 701 19 4o4 455 00 8o 478 81 ill 623 62 $840 258 62 ($ 6 999 87) 12 150 09 ( 23 986 14) 101 246 07 ( 15o 414 42) 78 664 o6 l0 659 79 $850 918 41 9 WATER REVENUE FUND NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT June 30, 1973 NOTE 1 The Water Revenue Fund is held by the Trustee for the deposit therein of all revenues collected by the Authority except those designated for construction of the water system improvements. Periodic withdrawals from the Water Revenue Fund are made by the Trustee for the following purposes: 1. The first priority of withdrawals from the Water Revenue Fund is to provide an unencumbered balance in the Operating Fund equal to the amount of the operating expenses for the current month and for the next suc- ceeding three months as provided in the Operating Fund budget. 2. The second priority of withdrawals from the Water Revenue Fund is to provide an amount to the Debt Service Fund so that the amount in the Debt Service Fund equals the unpaid interest that will become due on the first days of April and October, next ensuing, plus the amount of unpaid principal of outstanding bonds that will become due on the first day of October, next ensuing. 3. The third priority of withdrawals from the Water Revenue Fund is to provide an accumulated balance in the Replacement Fund of $200,000.00. 4. All remaining funds held in the Water Revenue Fund are paid into the Bond Redemption Fund. At June 30, 1973, the amount due to the Operating Fund, computed on the accrual basis of accounting, was $12 150.09; due to the Replacement Fund, $101,246.075 and the balance, $78,664.06 is due to the Bond Redemption Fund. These amounts totaling $1923060.22 may be reconciled with the following assets of the Water Revenue Fund at June 30, 1973: Cash - Trustee's account Water service charges receivable Earnings accrued on investments of other funds Accounts receivable - Other TOTAL $185 838 to 4 829 25 110 00 �192 060 22 10 WATER REVENUE FUND NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) NOTE 2 Revenues and investment income for the year ended June 30, 1973, totaled $707,628.56, computed on the accrual basis of account- ing, as follows: Water service charges for consumption during the year ended June 30, 1973 $686 462 81 Earnings on investments 21 165 75 TOTAL $707 628 56 ' The annual revenue required under the Resolution consists of: ire Operating Fund expenditures $254 526 55 Level debt service (110% of $435,000.00) 478 500 00 TOTAL $733 026 55 The rate for water service charges was established on the basis of an anticipated water consumption of 3,467,500,000 gallons; actual usage totaled 3,268,870,581 gallons. The production of revenue in any amount less than that required under the Resolution permits the declaration of all bonds outstanding to be due and paya- ble immediately'. However, the normal remedial action for such event of default is to provide, in the Debt Service Fund, the Replacement Fund, or Bond Redemption Fund, sufficient moneys to pay such matured bonds and interest as are due without acceleration of the terms. The funds required to pay all matured bonds and accrued z interest were held in the Debt Service Fund at June 30, 1973. 12 REPLACEMENT FUND NOTE TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 1973 NOTE Section 609 of the Resolution provides for the expenditure of moneys for reasonable and necessary expenses with respect to the water system for major repairs, replacements or maintenance items of a type not recurring annually or at shorter intervals, reconstruction of parts of the system, and the construction of additions to or ex- tensions of the system. A summary of such expenditures for the year ended June 30, 1973, is given below: Chemical feeder system installation Rooter set to keep drain clean Dedication stone Sterilizer for laboratory Replacement of chlorine pressure reducing valve Preliminary study on waste water treatment installation Automobile - 1973 Chevrolet Vega Repairs to Hydrofluoresilic pump Repairs to ductile and steel pipe line Repairs to manhole TOTALS ITEMS CAPITALIZED REPAIRS TOTAL $ 5 $ $ 5 487 487 00 - 00 15 83 15 - 83 - 605 8o 605 8o 3 288 20 - 3 288 20 1 467 15 - 1 467 15 - 149 43 149 43 - 2 721 25 2 721 25 - 455 12 455 12 $10 751 51 $3 931 60 $14 683 11 I REPLACEMENT FUND 11 STATEMENT OF FUND TRANSACTIONS For the year ended June 30, 1973 FUND BALANCE - July 1, 1972 ADD: Transfers from Water Revenue Fund Due from Water Revenue Fund: June 30, 1972 June 30, 1973 Earnings received on investments Earnings accrued on investments: June 30, 1972 June 30, 1973 TOTAL AVAILABLE DEDUCT: Expenditures for replace- ments: Paid Accounts payable: June 30, 1972 Reimbursement of replacement fund expenditures de- posited in Water Revenue Fund Retransfers of Water Revenue Fund (Pursuant to Section 609 of the Resolution for payments to the Operating Fund and Debt Service Fund) Transfer of income from investments to Water Revenue Fund FUND BALANCE - June 30, 1973 $15 648 18 EXHIBIT 'Y' $200 000 00 $8o47881 ( 23 986 14 ) 101 246 07 5 896 21 34( 296 52) 163 586 72 $363 586 72 ( 965 07)$ 14 683 11 FUND BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 1973 CONSISTS OF: Cash - Trustee's replacement account Investments (Schedule 3) Due from Water Revenue Fund TOTAL ASSETS AND FUND BALANCE 142 169 83 5 905 78 163 586 72 $200 000 00 $ 3 831 96 94 921 97 101 246 07 $200 000 00 �w BOND REDEMPTION FUND STATEMENT OF FUND TRANSACTIONS For the year ended June 30, 1973 FUND BALANCE - July 1, 1972 ADD: Transfers from Water Revenue Fund Due from Water Revenue Fund (Distribution of income) (Exhibit "En): June 30, 1972 June 30, 1973 Earnings received on investments Transfers from Debt Service Fund $111 623 62 ( 150 414 42) 78 664 o6 192 56 2 66o oo 13 EXHIBIT "G" $151 377 83 42 725 82 TOTAL AVAILABLE $194 103 65 DEDUCT: Cost of bonds purchased and retired - ++► $120,000.00 face amount of 3.80% water revenue bonds due October 1, 100 o0 2004 114 FUND BALANCE - June 30, 1973 $ 80 003 65 FUND BALANCE AT JUNE 305 1973 CONSISTS OF: Cash - Trustee's Bond Redemption Fund $ 1 339 59 Due from Water Revenue Fund (Distribution i of income) (Exhibit "E") 78 664 o6 $ 80 003 65 NOTE 1 - The balance of the Bond Redemption Fund, $80,003.65, at June 30, 1973, has been computed on the accrual basis of accounting. Actual deposits to the Fund will be made on the basis of available cash as prescribed by Section 606 of the Resolution, relating to transfers from the Water Revenue Fund at such times as money is available for such transfers. Requirements for transfers from the Water Revenue Fund to the Operating Fund or Debt Service Fund that are made subsequent to the balance sheet date have priority over the actual cash transfers to the Bond Redemption Fund, and reduce the amount that would be transferred if the accrual basis of accounting was pre- scribed for the actual transfers by the trustee. In August, 1973, $44,940.86 will be deposited in the Bond Redemption Fund. 14 I AM �w `"d BOND REDEMPTION FUND STATEMENT OF FUND TRANSACTIONS (Continued) NOTE 2 - Section 610 of the Resolution provides that whenever the moneys held in the Bond Redemption Fund exceed $105000.00, the Trustee may purchase bonds for redemption at prices not exceeding the redemption prices noted in Exhibit "I". Whenever moneys in the fund exceed $1005000.003 the Trustee shall call bonds for redemption at the earliest available call date. All term bonds must be redeemed before any serial bonds may be retired by operation of the Bond Redemption Fund. L �5 WATER SYSTEM PLANT AND EQUIPMENT CAPITALIZED COST OF CONSTRUCTION For the period April lo, 1961 to June 30, 1973 EXHIBIT "H" PAGE 1 YEAR ENDED TOTAL TO JUNE 30, JUKE 303 1972 1973 TOTAL WATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION Engineering - Plans and specifications Engineering - Land clearing Engineering - Supervision and resident project representative Engineering - Administration of ,subcontracts Engineering - Extra services Bid advertisements Land surveying and topo- graphic mapping Land appraisal and acquisition Site and water testing Contract - Filter plant Contract - Dam Contract - Pipelines Contract - Roads Contract - Reservoir clearing Contract - Maintenance building Contract - Fences Contract - Emergency power system Electrical substation relocation Reservoir buoys and safety cables Filter plant modifications Gauging stations Pumping and pipeline modifications and parts Observation point and landscaping Boat dock Spillway and clearwell drains TOTALS (Forward) $ 282 84o 69 $ - $ 282 84o 69 146 760 35 - 146 760 35 9 221 55 9 221 55 21 081 27 3 288 20 2�+ 369 47 729 10 - 729 10 81 659 42 - 81 659 42 507 607 64 - 507 607 64 31 249 46 - 31 249 46 1 766 791 51 - 1 766 791 51 2 336 752 01 - 2 336 752 01 1 345 237 43 - 1 345 237 43 315 o82 56 - 315 o82 56 618 244 42 - 618 244 42 24 638 8o - 24 638 8o 7 880 01 - 7 88o of 77 427 94 - 77 427 94 30 314 oo - 30 314 oo 3 140 56 - 3 140 56 16 102 51 5 414 16 21 516 67 1 001 20 - 1 001 20 20 454 12 - 20 454 12 4 797 30 95 00 4 892 30 1 549 11 - 1 549 11 3 895 21 - 3 895 21 $7 700 158 64 $8 797 36 $7 708 956 00 16 WATER SYSTEM PLANT AND EIPMENT CAPITALIZED COST OF CONSTRUCTION (Continued) TOTALS (Forwarded) WATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION ontinued Damages Miscellaneous costs Supplies and chemicals Electric power Fuel oil Forestry consultant Legal fees - Bond counsel Bond printing Legal fees - General counsel Accounting and auditing fees Salaries and payroll taxes Travel and meetings Office rental Telephone service Trustees' commissions Office supplies apd expenses Insurance Utility building TOTAL - WATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION MOBILE PLANT EQUIPMENT SMALL TOOLS TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT (Note) COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT ON BONDS TOTAL INVESTMENT IN WATER SYSTEM PLANT AND EQUUIP1,1ENT - June 30, 1973 EXHIBIT "H" PAGE �� — YEAR ENDED TOTAL TO JUNE 303 JUNE 30, 1972 1973 TOTAL $7 700 158 64 $8 797 36 $7 708 956 00 1 089 54 - 1 o89 54 715 14 - 715 14 7 417 95 - 7 417 95 677 76 - 677 76 931 47 890 1 890 oo - 1 oo 20 855 55 - 20 855 55 3 695 82 - 3 695 82 7 748 50 - 7 748 50 5 125 00 - 5 125 00 25 864 03 - 25 �+ 864 03 47 �+ 032 47 - 032 2 1 700 472 00 - 04 - 2 1 700 472 00 04 5 375 31 - R75 31 2 811 23 - 2 23 2 413 00 - 2 413 00 3 156 85 - 3 15685 $7 798 130 30 $8 797 36 $7 806 927 66 9 465 81 - 9 465 81 2 886 81 487 00 3 373 81 14 310 76( 1 490 67) 12 820 09 4 889 73 - 4 889 73 13 797 59 - 13 797 59 136 000 oo - 136 000 oo 7 979 481 00 $7 793 69 $7 987 �74 69 $7 987.274 69 NOTE: During the year ended June 30, 1973, the Authority traded a 1971 Ford 1/2 ton pick-up truck for a 1973 Chevrolet Vega economy car. The cost of the truck purchased in the fiscal year ended June 30, 1971 was $23957.82. The balance of the cost of the 1973 Chevrolet Vega was $15467.15 after trade-in. Ifto �7 F M H r-4 cd C H cd H �7 Cdd F+C CdNC a) C r4 Aral Na m FO N 4 � H �p m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o � 0 a H ri r1 ri H H N w [pw U O o co co co moo\ �0\ ca Off\ 1 H r-I H r-I r-a r-i r-1 p O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O cn N M c• � - ri H H H H H cn O O N O A E H ` O O 0 O 0 O rn 0 1 O ra O �t Q1, O� " r1 w O O O W H � � H O U N H � rN-I 4 r-1 H [1O tf} NNHO W p 000000 O O O O 0 z ri ri HH HH N ti O O O O O O 0 y HH O 0 0 0 W q O z OO 0 0 O N r' H a 1 0 0 0 0 0 p ti C 14HriHri i� [] d O N O O pO +-) H O 0 W O O a�� h a)+' �l O O JHi � 0)H m N N N N N ir1-i m O N aWi ri +3 td C.)+l A rl "-1 A +' HWWp 1`"1 m � 41 NN,i 1 t� �A � f mmmwto0 0� 0 0� Fi r ❑ ada ririHHra a� Had O UUUU00 O O O O O ti-I ri ri ri ,-I O O A O C— a)0 y w� UO c 0 oll3 01— +O-d N c-7 O O O O .i 10 r-1 0)N ti OJ co O\ S+ H O O O 0 i- U 4� .-a o\0\O\O\m W ri 14 ri Hri Oto x�LrIo O FcYH F NW 00L40)N N <C s-f � O a aH ri .-1 r� ri CMtit A "Id O .N +� $1 fa N fti H ad 4)+3 t-,C Gl NNNNNN NL' UA+i+- O AAAAA da riNO ad W 00000 a)�OC i +� +3 43 +� L. r-i 0 w U U U U U+> ad ri 00000�A43 r+ H a aiac+>rn 00000c 71 b 0 ad r4 +� 4- +3 + +� N W O N� �] w W iNi � N 41 R H A cd ,i a c r1 h- c— r oD w m o O ri y r-AU W N d ri O o\ O\ 0\ O\ O\ O\ H Hri r-I r-d ri H] A U 0 0 a A cd� cd Ea a . Oa m$�N�oo j riNNNNN Rcj'. � O '1 -P CaH O O+PC F, GLO NNNNNN p O .+ d*7 _� A H A O F1 ' dN AA 0A0A0A0A0 0 N a)0 +> +- ad +� a1+3 i� +� +> 7Z O-� L'PL ad ,1NL' UUUUUU O N P+ = H �l H 7'd6a+'' 000000 ab ab a 0 P A ,4) ad I C 18 CONSTRUCTION FUND STATEMENT OF CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS For the year ended June 30, 1973 CASH BALANCE - July 1, 1972 RECEIPTS Disposition of investments Interest on investments of Construction Fund TRANSFER OF INCOME TO PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT TOTAL RECEIPTS, BALANCE AND TRANSFER DISBURSEMENTS Purchase of investments TRANSFER OF INCOME TO PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS AND TRANSFER CASH BALANCE - June 30, 1973 (Exhibit "A") SCHEDULE 1 PRINCIPAL INCOME $ 1 992 71 $ - 237 386 20 - 2 613 80 2 613 8o - $241 992 71 $2 613 80 $236 938 00 $ - - 2 613 8o $236 938 00 $2 613 80 $ 5 054 71 $ - 4 M n Mo OPERATING FUND EXPENDITURES For the year ended June 30,.1973 SCHEDULE 2 PAGE 1 ACTUAL OVER UNDER* BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET OPERATION irr General operating supervision: Salary - Chief plant superin- tendent $ 10 724 oo $ 10 774 00 $ 50 00 - Chemist 11 166 oo 11 5o4 oo 338 oo - Maintenance mechanic 5 6690o 5 742 00 73 00 Total - General Operatin-g—supervision $ 27 559 00 $ 28 020 00 $ 461 oo Source of supply expenses: Operating supplies and $ 50 00 $ 50 00* expense Total - Source of supply expenses $ 50 00 $ 50 00* Raw water pumping expenses: Power purchased $ 12 000 00 $ 13 447 68 $ 1 447 68 Pumping supplies and 100 00 - 100 00* ift expenses Maintenance of equipment 500 00 804 46 3o4 46 Total - Raw water $ 12 60o oo $ 14 252 14 $ 1 652 14 _pumping _expenses Purification expenses: $ 55 497 00 $ 61 661 oo $ 6 164 oo Salaries and wages Purification supplies - 74 000 oo 85 5o4 15 11 504 15 Chemicals Purification supplies and 6 000 oo 4 13o 46 1 869 54* expenses Power purchased 3 600 oo 4 773 358 12 44 1 173 1 358 12 44 Heating purification plant 2 000 00 3 Maintenance of purification 3 600 oo 789 59 2 810 41* system - Building Maintenance of purification system - Equipment 7 000 00 4 oil 10- 2 988 90* Total - Purification Zp151 697 00 A,164 227 86 $.12 530 86 expenses 20 11 OPERATING FUND EXPENDITURES (Continued) OPERATION (Continued) Transmission expenses Maintenance of equipment Maintenance of structures Maintenance of mains Maintenance of meters Total- Transmission expenses Contingencies TOTAL OPERATION ADMINISTRATION AND GENERAL Administration: Salaries of general executives Other general office salaries Expenses of general executives and employees Stationery, printing and supplies Telephone, telegraph and postage Dues and subscriptions Miscellaneous and general expenses Maintenance of office furniture and equipment Maintenance of Miscellaneous BUDGET ACTUAL SCHEDULE 2 PAGE 2 ACTUAL OVER UNDER* BUDGET $ 600 oo $ - $ 600 oo* 120 00 - 120 00* 36o oo 30 00 330 00* 1 400 oo 681 45 7i8 55* $ 2 480 00 $ 711 45 1 768 55* -$- $ 3 157 00 $ - $ 3 157 00* $197 543 00 $207 211 45 $ 9 668 45 $ 13 500 00 $ 13 500 00 $ 4 972 00 5 022 00 24o oo 600 00 2 500 00 300 00 720 00 600 00 83 6o 647 46 2 121 99 510 90 510 37 234 67 50 00 156 4o* 47 46 378 Ol* 210 90 209 63* 365 33* property 500 00 912 33 412 33 Total - Administration $ 23 932 00 $ 23 543 32 $ 388 68* Services by others: Consulting engineer General counsel Auditor Trustee Total. - Services by others $ 3 600 oo $ 210 62 $ 3 389 38* 3 000 00 3 000 00 2 400 00 2 250 00 150 00* 2 400 00 1 435 83 964 17* 1 11 400 0o $ 6 896 45 $ 4 503 55* ram, Nqw� OPERATING FUND EXPENDITURES (Continued) ADMINISTRATION AND GENERAL (Continued) Miscellaneous: Insurance Social Security taxes Employees' insurance - Hospitalization Total - Miscellaneous BUDGET ACTUAL 21 SCHEDULE 2 PAGE 3 ACTUAL OVER UNDER* BUDGET $ 8 400 00 $ 8 915 00 $ 515 00 4 800 oo 5 622 77 822 77 3 600 oo 2 337 56 1 262 44* $ 16 800 oo $ 16 875 33 $ 75 33 TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE D GENERAL $ 52 132 oo $ 47 315 to $ 4 816 go* GRAND TOTAL $249 675 00 $254 526 55 $ 4 851 55 cm 22 INVESTMENTS SCHEDULE 3 DATE OF AMORTIZATION INVENTORY MATURITY CONSTRUCTION FUND MATURITY COST OF DISCOUNT VALUE VALUE United States Treasury bills August 2,. 1973 $ 59 047 80 $ 617 92 $ 59 665 72 $ 60 000 00 DEBT SERVICE FUND United States Treasury bills July 5, 1973 $157 371 00 $ 2 489 16 $159 860 16 $160 000 00 United States Treasury bills July 5, 1973 lo4 030 44 885 98 104 916 42 105 000 00 United States Treasury bills August 9, 1973 137 934 50 1 157 59 139 092 09 140 000 00 TOTALS - DEBT 399 335 94 $ 4 532 73 $403 868 67 $405 000 00 REPLACEMENT FUND United States Treasury bills July 5, 1973 $ 94 625 45 $ 29652 $ 94 921 97 $ 95 000 00 err INSURANCE IN FORCE June 30, 1973 PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY - BLANKET COVERAGE Fire, lightning storms, explosions and riot Inland floater: All external risks to water pipelines ($1,500.00 deductible Boat ($50.00 deductible3 Radio equipment ($25.00 deductible) Tractor and equipment ($10.00 deductible) Automobile physical damage ($100.00 deductible) Comprehensive automobile liability: Bodily injury, Property damage Comprehensive general liability: Bodily injury Property damage Crime - Burglary Boiler business interruption PUBLIC OFFICIAL'S BOND - Richard E. Bain, Treasurer BLANKET POSITION BOND - Members of the Board and employees of the Authority Each person WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 23 SCHEDULE 4 COVERAGE $2 450 000 00 1 343 000 00 2 200 00 4 748 oo $ 4 074 00 Actual Cash Value $500 000 00- 2 000 000 00 1 500 000 00 $500 000 00- 2 000 000 00 500 000 00 $ 250 00 Schedule $ 2 500 00 $ 2 500 00 Standard 211, C O M M E N T S� HISTORY y_ The Appomattox River Water Authority is a public body corporate and politic, organized under the provisions of the Virginia Water and Sewer Authorities Act, by the governing bodies of the Counties of Chesterfield, Dinwiddie and Prince George, Virginia, and of the City of Petersburg, Virginia, and the City of Colonial Heights, Virginia. A certificate of incorporation was issued by the State Corporation Commission of the Commonwealth of Virginia on November 21, 196o. The purpose of the Authority is to provide a supply of filtered water for the members of the Authority. The Authority is authorized to issue bonds payable solely from revenues to construct a water system, including an impounding reservoir dam, filter plant, pumping station, transmission mains and connections thereto, and access roads and parking areas, and to acquire sufficient land to provide a cleared area for the reservoir. The Resolution under which the Authority has sold water revenue bonds in the aggregate amount of $8,500,000.00 requires that the funds described below will be held by the United Virginia Bank/ State Planters, Richmond, Virginia, as Trustee. CONSTRUCTION FUND The Trustee is required to hold, with suitable investment of excess cash, the monies received for construction of water system improvements until requisitions prepared by the Authority, with the approval of the Consulting Engineer (and the Legal Counsel in the case of land acquisitions) request the transfer of funds to the Special Construction Account for payment of all proper costs of construction. �5 The use of the Construction Fund will continue until completion of the water system improvements, and any remaining amount not needed for construction or bond interest is to be transferred to.the Bond Redemption Fund after such completion. DEBT SERVICE FUND The Debt Service Fund is held by the Trustee for the pay- ment of principal of the water revenue bonds and the interest thereon when due. Four years' interest, $1,261,500.00 was set aside from the proceeds from the sale of water revenue bonds for the payment of interest during construction. At June 30, 1973, the debt service re- quirements due within one year consisting of interest on water revenue bonds totaling $212,816.25 and $120,000.00 principal on serial bonds due October 1, 1973, has been provided from revenue prior to the balance sheet date. WATER REVENUE FUND The Water Revenue Fund is held by the Trustee for the receipt of all revenues from the operation or ownership of the water system. Monies received are transferred by the Trustee to the Operating Fund, Debt Service Fund, Replacement Fund and Bond Redemption Fund pursuant to the requirements for each of these funds, and in the priority as listed. REPLACEMENT FUND The Replacement Fund is to receive a maximum balance of $200,000.00 from the Water Revenue Fund, to be used for the reasonable and necessary, costs of major repairs, replacements or maintenance of the system. Unencumbered funds of the Replacement Fund are available for the transfer to and purposes of the Operating Fund or the Debt Service Fund. i 26 BOND REDEMPTION FUND The Bond Redemption Fund will receive from the Water Revenue Fund all monies not needed for the monthly requirements of the Operating Fund, the Debt Service Fund and the Replacement Fund. When the money held in this Fund exceeds $10,000.00, the Trustee may purchase bonds at a price not to exceed the applicable redemption price; when the money held in this Fund exceeds $100,000.003 the Trustee shall call bonds for redemption at the earliest redemption date. OPERATING FUND The Operating Fund is held under the control and direction of the Authority for the payment of all expenditures related to operation of the water system, in accordance with appropriations included in the approved budget for this Fund. The cash balance is replenished at periodic intervals by transfers from the Water Revenue Fund, so that the unencumbered balance is equal to the budgeted ex- penditures of the current month and the next three succeeding months. n COLONEL E. P. GILL CHIEF OF POLICE E. T. SMITH CAPTAIN OF DETECTIVES W. E. MARTIN CAPTAIN OF POLICE COUNTY OF CH E S T E R F I E L D CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA POLICE DEPARTM ENT October 4, 1973 Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Gentlemen: I would like to recommend the following men listed on the attached sheets for appointment as police officers for the County of Chesteffield beginning Octoberil, 1973 through November 1, 1977. NorPKO a 70' &A' The Dog Wardens, Clarke Dean Pace and Hunter Malcolm Herndon will 17,,., be for a one year appointment beginning November 1973 through October 31, 1974. Very truly yours, Colonel E. P. Gill Chief of Police EPG/jc N�34�55 OCT 1973 RECEIVED I2Zso OFF L GNfS 79 COLONEL E. P. GILL CHIEF OF POLICE E. T. SMITH CAPTAIN OF DETECTIVES W. E. MARTIN CAPTAIN OF POLICE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA POLICE DEPARTM ENT October 4, 1973 Mr. M. W. Burnett County Administrator Chesterfield County, Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: I would appreciate it if you would have these appointments approved at the October loth meething of the Board of Supervisors so that the men may qualify before October 31, 1973. I would sincerely appreciate it if you would handle my appointment as you have in the past. Thanking you for your understanding and cooperation, I remain Sincerely yours, Colonel E. P. Gill Chief of Police EPG/jc / U� r,197, C " 8'w rft- 77, v, R. B. AUGUSTINE INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. 302 MUTUAL BUILDING P. O. BOX 1478 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23212 R. B. Auamms, JR. CozmuA A. LsmY DOROTHY E. Kim Col. Edgar P. Gill, Chief of Police Chesterfield County, Chesterfield, Virginia. Dear Col. Gill: September 11, 1973. Re: Bonds for the members of the Chesterfield Police Tor arsoxs 648-2868 We are listing below list of Officers (Police) we are bonding through the Fidelity and Deposit Company. Some of these menus bonds automa- tically expire on November 1, 1973 or October 31, 1973. Some of them were added at various times since November 1, 1969. We are listing all as we under- stand they will be re -appointed for a term of four years from November 1, 1973 in order to get a lower premium. The men are as follows: William L, Adams J. W. &pplewhite Ralph Randolph Arehart Raymond Douglas Adkins Duncan Steele Beasley, Jr. John Royce Bucka Gilbert Leonard Bartle Jimmy E. Brown James E. Campbell Mason Tudor Chalkley Tommy J. Cheek Bernard Franklin Cowardin, Jr. Patrolman and Police Officer Police Officer - Sergeant Patrolman & Police Officer Police Officer - Lieutenant Patrolman - Police Officer Patrolman - Police Officer Patrolman - Police Officer Patrolman - Police Officer Patrolman - Police Officer Police Officer - Detective Sgt. Patrolman - Police Officer Patrolman - Police Officer Col. Edgar P. Gill, Sheet No. 2 Edwin Thomas Smith — G mos. Police Officer-Captain-oetertive Carlos W. Cunningham Police Officer - Lieutenant Allen Carlton Davis Police Officer Detective Robert James Doyle Police Officer William Valvin Driskill Police Officer Sergeant James Michael Dudley Patrolman - Police Officer Thurman E. Estes, Jr. Patrolman - Police Officer Robert Giles Foster Patrolman - Police Officer Robert Cecil French Patrolman - Police Officer Bernard Chester Furman Police Officer - Detective Edward Linwood Gettings Police Officer - Sergeant Edgar P. Gill Chief of Police Otis Elston Greene Police Officer Detective L. C. Hamner, Jr. Police Officer Sergeant Charles Warren Hall Patrolman - Police Officer Hunter Malcolm Herndon Patrolman - Police Officer James H. Johnston, III Police Officer - Detective Charles Ernest Jones Police Officer - Sergeant John Wesley Layne, Jr. Patrolman - Police Officer Walter L. Lovelady, Jr. Patrolman - Police Officer Allie V. Maddra, III Patrolman - Police Officer James Herbert Marable Police Officer - Detective William Edward Martin Police Officer - Capt. of Police (Patrol) Thomas H. Mabe Patrolman - Police Officer Raymond Leroy Neace, Jr. Patrolman - Police Officer Col. Edgar P. Gill Sheet No. 3* Clarke Dean Pace Linwood Miller Parrish John A. Phillips Terence Phillips Raymond Carter Phillips Joseph E. Pittman, Jr. R. E. Puckett Charlie E. Richter Special Police and Dog Warden Police Officer - Detective Police Officer - Detective Sergeant Patrolman - Police Officer Police Officer - Lieutenant Police Officer - Lieutenant Patrolman - Police Officer Police Officer - Lieutenant Herbert M. Shelton Police Officer Detective Linwood Shenfal Matthews Patrolman - Police Officer William Frederick Showalter Patrolman - Police Officer J. k. Simmons Police Officer - Lieutenant Martin L. Starnes Patrolman - Police Officer Earl Lee Stewart Patrolman - Police Officer John Tolliver Terrell, Jr. Patrolman - Police Officer Lemerle Cover Trader Police Officer John Gregory Trueheart Patrolman - Police Officer Larry Herbert Vaughan Patrolman - Police Officer Morris Gordon Vaughan Patrolman - Police Officer Clyde Wayne Ward Police Officer Detective Douglas Bruce Watson, Jr. Patrolman - Police Officer Wilber C. Welton Police Officer - Lieutenant Clarence Guy Williams, Jr. Patrolman - Police Officer Mark Evans Wilson Police Officer Detective Supervisor Police Col. Edgar P. Gills Sheet No, 4 W07George F. PalsII Thomas Marshall Gleason James Merrison Rudd James Francis Mitchell Stephen D. Smith Patrolman - Police Officer Patrolman - Police Officer Patrolman Police Officer Patrolman - Police Officer Patrolman - Police Officer We enclose herewith two copies (original and copy) of this list and you can mark on the copy those re -appointed and the effective date of their appointment, together with term for which they are appointed and we will arrange for the bonds. We will send your Department a sufficient supply of bond applications for each officer to sign and you will return them to this office. We trust you will find this list in order and thank you for your consideration. Yours very truly, R. B. AUGUSTINE IJS. AGENCY, INC. GAL BY 0- c* t%, L'C-L AZ'r n n HUNTON,WILLIAMS, GAY & GIBSON 700 EAST MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 1535 RICHMOND. VIRGINIA 23212 TELEPHONE (804) 649-3661 CABLE HUNTWAND October 5, 1973 Mr. M. W. Burnett County Administrator Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia. Chesterfield County - $1,500,000 Nursing Home Revenue Bonds Dear Mel: WASHINGTON, D. C. OFFICE 1730 PENNSYLVANIA AVE. N.W. 20006 SUITE 1060 TELEPHONE (202) 833-1680 FILE NO. OCT� � e R��,El 1973 �\ In accordance with our conversation on Thursday afternoon, we will look forward to working with you and other representatives of the County in connection with a proposed revenue bond financing for the County's nursing home. This will be interesting to us because it will have certain features which are different from the normal county bond issue. I mentioned to you the necessity for us to make the disclosure under the Virginia Conflict of Interests Act which we feel we are required to make to every public body which employs us in connection with municipal bond work. This disclosure is required because certain lawyers in this firm or their spouses are officers or employees of various governmental agencies of the Commonwealth. The fact that most of these associations are of the voluntary type without financial consideration seems to make no difference. Accordingly, you will find our disclosure letter and the suggested form of resolution to be adopted by your Board of Supervisors in connection with the disclosure and our employment. We would appreciate having a certified copy of the resolution for our file. I am sending a copy of this letter and enclosures to the Commonwealth's Attorney for his information. Ver tru y yours, 213/338 Harr Frazier, III cc: Oliver D. Rudy, Esquire En M HUNT ON, WILLIAMS, GAY & GIBSON 700 EAST MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 1535 RICHMOND. TIRGiNIA 23212 TELEPHONE (804) 649-3661 CABLE HUNTWAND October 5, 1973 Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia Virginia Conflict of Interests Act Gentlemen: WASHINoTON. D. C. OFFICE 1730 PENNSYLVANIA AVE. N.W. 20006 SUITE 1060 TELEPHONE (202) 833.1680 FILE NO. The undersigned with whom you propose to contract for legal services as your bond counsel in connection with the issuance and sale of approximately $1,500,000 Nursing Home Revenue Bonds makes the disclosure shown on the attached list of the members or associates (or their spouses) who are officers or employees of "governmental agencies" of the Commonwealth of Virginia. This disclosure is being made pursuant to Virginia Code Sections 2.1-349(a)(2) and (b)(5), being part of the Virginia Conflict of Interests Act. Very truly yours, 5460 Att. cc: City of Richmond School Board Richmond Community Mental Health Virginia Port Authority and Mental Retardation University of Virginia Services Board Attorney General of Virginia Richmond Redevelopment and Richmond Public Library Board Housing Authority M STATEMENT OF "INTERESTS" IN GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES BY MEMBERS OR ASSOCIATES (OR THEIR WIVES) OF HUNTON, WILLIAMS, GAY & GIBSON Name of Partner or Associate Agency Relationship Lewis T. Booker City of Richmond School Vice Chairman Board Robert P. Buford University of Virginia Member, Board of Visitors Joseph C. Carter, Jr. Richmond Public Library Chairman Board E. Milton Farley, III kichmond Redevelopment and Wife, Joan Farley, is Housing Authority a commissioner Allen C. Goolsby, III Richmond Community Mental Member Health and Mental Retard- ation Services Board Allen C. Goolsby, III Attorney General of Wife, Katherine L. Virginia Goolsby, is employed as Assistant Attorney Genera] George H. Hettrick Virginia Port Authority Vice Chairman Harry J. Warthen, III Attorney General of Wife, Sally T. Warthen, Virginia is employed as Assistant Attorney General 9/19/73 cm WHZUBAS, they Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County desires to retain the firm of Hunton, Williams, Gay & Gibson, Richmond, Virginia, as its bond counsel in connection with the issuance and sale of approximately $19500,000 Nunrsing nose Revenue Bands; and MMWJAS, the Board of Supervisors has received a disclosure by Hunton, Williams, Gay & Gibson pursuant to Virginia Code Sections 2.1.349(a)(2) and (b)(5), being part of the Virginia Conflict of Interests Act, of certain members and associates of such firm, and spouses of members or associates, who serve governmental agencies other than the County; COUNTY9 VIRGINIA t 1. Hunton, Williams, Gay & Gibson, Richmond, Virginia, shall be retained as bond counsel in connection with the issuance and sale of approximately $105009000 Nursing HMO Revenue Bonds. 2. The agreement to retain Hunton, Williams, Gay & Gibson as bond counsel is a contract for legal Serricte$ which, in the Judgment of the Board of Supervisors, in the public interest should not be acquired through competitive bidding. 3. This resolution shall be filed as a matter of public record with the minutes of this meeting. In CM i I=MS, the Board of SuP*rvisors of Chesterfield Canty desires to retain the firm of Eton, Willisss, Gay a Gibson, RIcbM ond, Virginia, as its bond counsel in COUGOation with the issuance and sale of apfixuotja tsly $103m 000 Nursing Mama Revenuwe Bonds; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has receiv*d a disclosure by Ruston, Willims, Gay & Gibem pursuant to Virginia Code Secatiens 2.1-3$9(a) (2) and (b) (S), being hart of the Virginia Conflict of Interests Act, of certain members and assoaiates of such firm, and spouses of members or associates, who serve govrere:meuttal agencies other than the COMty; COtRP 9 VIR(;Nu t 1. RMton, Williams, Gay & Gibson, Richmaond, Virginia, shall be retained as bond peel in CONWAstimwith the issue=* end sale of a Prmis"Oly $19501, i hhnrsing Rom R"vaue sondes 2. Ths agreement to retain Bunton, Williams, Gay & Gibson u bond coans+ol is a oetracet for legal #arches vWb, in the judgmeent of the Hoard of Supervisore, in the public interest should not be acquired through Competitive bidding. 3. This resolution shall be filed as a matter of public rseord with the minutes of this misting. M COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD 15 INTRACOUNTY CORRESPONDENCE TO: Mr. M. W. Burnett FROM: J. R. Condrey k"l SUBJECT: Grant for Juvenile Detention Home October 5, 1973 Please ask the Supervisors on October 10, 1973 to authorize Patrick M. O'Hare, Superintendent, to submit a grant appliation amounting to $11,708.18 to Division of Justice and Crime Prevention. The County's share will be 585. 2� The grant funds will be used to finance a library an c assroom center at the Detention Home. We will request a change in the 73-74 budget after the grant application is approved. JRC:gc 0p.01 � f -Fit r� so�� 44 OCT 1973 RECEIVED N i �0 OFMRS in STREET LIGHTS 10-10-73 3300 Lumen Mercury Vapor at: 1. Merriwood and Route 1 2. Aldridge Avenue and Route 1 3. Cobbs Road and State Road 4. Central and Bermuda 7000 Lumen Mercury Vapor light at: 1. Harrogate and Curtis Street 1973 C Nate mr. irvin G. F.orner 3707 Hull StCreet Richmond, Virginia Dear Irvin: September 24, 1973 i enjoyed having breakfast with you and other members of the chesterfield Board of Supervisors recently. i wanted you to know that I an very much aware of the road problems existing in Chesterfield County and that as Governor I would certainly clo what I could to alleviate these. Also I want to assure YOU again that, while i am interested in regional coo?aratica, I feel that it must be on a voluntary basis and not si:fbje-ct to any coercion from the State financially or otherwise. ,thank you again for allo-wing ime the ,3rivilege of listening to your views and being able to express some of my concerns. it is vital t1lat we work together if Virginia is to progress in a proper manner during the next four years. sincerely yours, Mills E. God'd-in, Jr. MEGj r/n1 CC: bir. M. W. Burne%-.t vo Appomattox River Water Authority Phone 526-7145 R. F.D. 5, Box 362 Petersburg, Virginia 23803 FRED J. SWEARMGEN Chairman ROBBRT RrrcHDE Vice -Chairman RoBERT C. KLEPPER Secretary-Trieamrer M. W. BURNETT LEWLs Z. JOHNSTON. JR. LLEWELLYN F. Ross General Manager October 8, 1973 Chairman Board of Supervisors County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section 3 of the Articles of Incorporation of the Appomattox River Water Authority as contained in the concurrent resolution relating to the creation of the said Authority and adopted by the councils of the cities of Petersburg and Colonial Heights, and the Board of Supervisors of the counties of Chester- field, Dinwiddie, and Prince George dated October 13, 1960; and, pursuant to the 1962 Act of the General Assembly of Virginia validating the creation of said Authority, you are reminded that the one year term of the present member representing Chesterfield County will expire on November 21, 1973. You are therefore, respectfully requested to name the successor to Mr. M. W. Burnett, current representative of the county, to serve for a period of 4 years beginning November 21, 1973. A certified copy of that portion of your body's minutes relating to this appointment, addressed to the undersigned, will be appreciated. Very truly yours, APPOMATTOX RIVER WATER AUTHORITY Llewellyn F. Rose LFR/cw Manager rzoo r 3CT 1973 RECEIV D OIII-geng- 1�9Z�vjt M COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD M INTRACOUNTY CORRESPONDENCE TO: Mr. M. W. Burnett FROM: J. R. Condrey p SUBJECT: Revenue Sharing October 9, 197 .�� 00r,973 Please ask the Supervisors on October 10 to approve employing Dan Robinson and Bob Fitzgerald to represent the County in a Federal Court in an effort to obtain more revenue sharing funds. Fitzgerald will want a retainer of $1,000.00 and a contingent fee of 10% of any additional revenue sharing funds obtained as a result of the court action up to a maximum contingency fee of $15,000.00. The court costs will be about $500.00. Dan Robinson will bill us about $1,500.00 so our mimimum costs will be $3,000.00. I am recommending this because these two men are representing about 18 counties in a class action suit and I believe this will be our most economical method of financing this matter. On September 25, the Office of Revenue Sharing notified us of the final rejection of our protest. I believe we have 60 days from September 25 to file suit or we must forget the matter. I think Revenue Sharing officials treated the County unfairly because they did not consider the tuition amounts not paid by the City of Richmond. Failure to pursue this matter in court may prejudice our case about tuition with the annexation court. JRC:gc -Are -rem /a, IP73 /,q ro c 4 0- Alww-oal 000*1tpee-r. Ifec000mko A ?000 �vo -R44 I'Lr l s"o vef, A- r., h, SO -k 4 /C Aoq3 A-010"Ifftim-f Zr e -- --- -- ---- AT Co veco To #" lg;c e o Js - gin - � ;, - /I -S _ r. 0 /Hare//� Y�.r_- r ,�1-10" .fe_eow Tpoi4h _wo0js___ -Y-0-4 all .r ✓a !k N _- CVf T.0 - /`t Nis✓Kt .fe�W_avc - --AP4 !v e/l /%/o_vel,, ��r - � e.-J'oH ,l-- c~ f ; - -- - _ _ � � r delf 1-4 is j 1y,*,v4wye "vAyl-q t: e✓ _, e/__tr r_ _ __ __t�0✓! K� �� C QYMIel /l!-+�i'�'1 � Ca'�✓►4 __ �(/I1_d.r ...SF:� LO�IyO��/- ply to X, CA rs � v 1 a ow&ee v 1~_ /,r v a - - -ive�v -lo o nr_cl *vrr 0974a:- GWcc_� - _ - _ � L�Ec.��c �� f�io t/X7► rrh __ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ Sri¢ ..�+e/ I/ -/WV l< r_ /ice [ ,[,_ r - 7-!-f 4-r4 e__ _ - s-��- - -- - -- 1 Sol i• 9� f e� r��- ,QN r a• 54,o�1� - e1a — vh� �_ -- , r -- *400 II �O 7 +JY._ -�voy_ //w �O_ G - 0_ _/�% 'C J 77t 74 _ __ a � ��.wry -- /�e�rcrerz�__�/i1C�� - a�►o,res __o r alQ�•►^._ __ _cc4r •rcjrryWooe�- M + / - ! i�r �0 4 - eHS __- 1 o� i✓oo-1 Srijlrs-ffl4 . i eyrel! 1�ososXoc k PJOMOH rl e1O - , J o u n j 4 N iw_ calc e 7Co r -frtvc -� i Scr©h_Ir : - - - 73S tr - YG -- 1 -C-..* e00 .Pow Te. �,r►i.c�,,�+-__l�tt�t-y�s �= � d T Lt y r� c t/Ot✓.__�[_I _ ..�.r.J Q1-1rc/G- _------ C • _ - / ttv,( ,�c. rKC --rG_ �. �R �l�/ D �r ,r 11� - z4 - S/- z_ -- - 51 - ms - /4(4-.Gees.-&-"S rs-- Am" Srq" _ IVY- __ � �_ — �at�� !lydt—�-a--TAY ✓ o _-2��._-- J O �Purdiw,__!r_ mom_ a Ac."A A �Qrary _r?" !.✓i��ii►Q1[ � o%�f.Irwe��i� _ �/'�► T �ic Ltl1l�,Q� ?`�4_�G�_1� �_� ��/ wS Cio/ 7 AwZY 7-L -e-_4-�l COWIdGt.r? P+r►--- DG v [ V Pam r Jon - Or/2 c s jEcsv. oT t %rr%t•� �✓IO_ _ r_ C t �-r1 tJT'__ �G 7_-'S_ _/_s+ ._ Dbola+�.f - -- ; rfC 0 % .. /�1Lller -eo w/-- t o oca 00 �—r_7_40 7 ✓'t. .[ h s _ wo, No 74 h4a ve ex j- 4,- !C �E_ •=- _7�d1''�' %!1� f?t Ci.+� 1 / %%rIC U 00�6r _ __ _ - _ _ j /S _�.S/�'�r-Qr�r�/ �tl��G��•+(--_kOl�t�o.+�s_-- �?�'�cff � J'�'�l �Q«_�1• / l 6:cs " QL•JCIS_ G o/vIo/m/ems �alr04- h ar__/tQOLL. aL . - _ _.. 'h✓ %?i%l r.._. - e - .r o f _Cazr t 4� " _ .77F' e__AkPok dl�Zic a / G t✓ e1 _ -------------- ---- - - Q-f lol r eN .t f s� irfl a- -c° 0 C Ono - - --_ __ '�1o_Hs _-�Y _1�.�_r_�-u�'f-��__._�•�.� a/_e_�•�lQ�- -r4� q�e.�_�_ Ya r_ P.f i - _ _ 4 �Se �J1^�C' yr c�_�s C/ 1 n�. fGr� �+�c d� _ _ cif t �`�✓' -hs � _- Yhe_e- 47 4)�__ .r/`.lvrr_i/Itov_.S'csoo_4"�+i�•��_ck_.s., _.M.l�- - - I Q - 7 - s f r�► �!/ �I'i le- VY_ TQk. Fu l - - Jane rs'�cr4f ,�/•,•.•� _/"Qp c - PT.,l'9�. -[H v �'�e _ t .- o a ti execui� •;e wee_�"'7 ,�%_ 11 1 -- _ - tS'�'Ye re tS'o c 1 R. /Ciro �r � ws_ � - e 6-va � �d� i I - N0_ .Sewer_ -h - / - -- -- -_ _ - --- --- �-/%1ti�r_�� ----. / � _�_�u•cde._��1_�r,.c_.1� 1 _"1-ry � .•��,�'" "� /.t oo c�'�a�,.y at 1..��rttr_L �� Gt+t_ C/�llza�i ��4-��. --�1�1 _/1'%Y a•�F%r� 4 k ___ _ -- �a�c«.J _ - /Q_7 !,_�'o� 9r._c_�✓.o!_ �as i IP--Z� ��H�� t�'How_ !�' _ _ le, e -k---fvt) em m., A-C, -Hvj4_ c �e - T•� j•+► e1- - - y� / Q Z ' 7. /Wr�� _l.�!/T /' a cC�so . - __ lQo. ass_ 10�, ..�'` _ '• �r /�f' v 67 �3 2 �"`�B-rs� � f- • j'�w.+�C ��." /I erC "' - /fit �_-�Gt(✓t.w �Q�i��a ,� 14 - / - %3-2S"fl-e�11%,/i_ ll j'Ir,-Ci?oo�e Ape 7 - _ _ _ _ - � ✓ ��'�-h ---k� e � Gl"t- �ir_ ��r _ _C� cam. �.r = . - o P bold_- •arh f rin fi+ Apor � L l 97 4- - -- - - - - 'vi9'_ �= ' -11)�W '+"Aer-fo pf- JOW-0-Y ej,- 'O'er- ----- - - - --- --- _ _�-- -- -- - _- - - - ---- - - - --. -- - - t nRave" j Al �_ - --- -- - r _ r 14�a►-fog _ �r%lo Yer,`