The URL can be used to link to this page

04-27-77 PacketPresetzt : Mc . E - D3er3- in O' Neill , Mrs _ Joan , Vice-CkxELi-rrns + Dir. J. Ruffin Appers m -x Mr. C. L. Hoolcnmmz Mv. Garlaz2d Dodd Mr_ C. G. Mazauel, Sxi--em+**+ Co. Acro.++. VIIiG=NSA: At a regular meeting oI� the Board o£ Supervisors o£ Chesterfield County, held at the Courthouse on April 27, 1977, at 10--00 a.m. Also Pre �t: - Mr. Stanley Balderson, Chic£ o£ Dev_ Review D?rs _ Joan Doleza.l , Secretary D,Ir_ Rig-kzm+-a MCEl£ish,R<ig- M=-. Steve Micas, County Attorney Mr_ Robert Painter, Dar. o£ Utilities 1 • . Charles . iami f£, Supt _ o£ Accoaazts and Records Mir-. l.acze Ramsey, Budget Director Dor _ M-Lc:kx .el Ritz , Dl=- o£ Com..,. >*+; ty Dev 143:r _ David Asst . Dir _ o£ Utilities Dir_ W_ Lycai Wingfield, Asst_ to Co_ Admire_ Mrs- Girone calls the meeting to order at 9:00 a -m - Mr - Dodd gives the invocation. On motion o£ Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that the minutes o£ April 13th, 15th, 181t:h and 20tH be and they hereby arc approved as amended _ Ayes : Mrs _ Girona , Mr. Apperson, Mr . Bookman and 1,4r- Dodd. Mr. Hodge asks that disoussion o£ the computer contracts be. de£erx`ed until later this day: =t is on motion or Mrs_ Girone, seconded by Mr. BOO1.4=mmwx resolved that the Board accepts an agreement between the County and the Developers o£ Edgehill <and better known as the Old Girl Scout Property and authorized the Chairman to sigrz a save -Harmless agreement with the Highway Department for certain drainage easements that may be necessary to be acquired in the development o£ Edgehill <anc'L better known as the Old Girl Scout Property) . Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Appersorx, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. It is on motion o£ M=a- Girona , seconded by M=- Apperson , resolved that the State Highway Department be and it Hereby is requested to accept the roads in Edgehill, Section B, into the State Secondary Road System. <A copy o£ cFie roads will be typed in the permanent Minute Book . -yes : Mrs _ Girone , Mr . Apperson , MI - Bookman and Mr - Dodd Mr. Manuel informs the Board `te"f"'i'ie' loads in the following sub- divisions have been formally accepted into the State Secondary Road System, effective as indicated: Mt. Blanco Poplar Grove Winterberry Ridge Old Fox Trail Brandermill Parkway (A copy of the roads and their descriptions will be typed in the permanent Minute Book.) Mr. Ritz presents the Board with an:annual report of the activities of the Planning Commission and the Board of Zoning Appeals. The Board commends both groups for their work. It is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that this Board accepts the report of the activities of the Planning Commission, Board of Zoning Appeals and the Planning Department for 1976. Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. It is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the State Highway Department be and it hereby is requested to accept LeMaster Road as a Rural Road Addition. Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr, Dodd. It is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the State Highway Department be and it'hereby is requested to accept Butler Road (off of Rowlett Road) as a Rural Road Addition. Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. Mr. Ritz presents the Board with copies of the updated County maps in booklet form. There is some discussion regarding sewer line extension to Loch Braemar, Section B. Mr. Welchons states he does not have any cost figures for this project. It is generally agreed that this matter be deferred until later this afternoon. After some discussion regarding Mr. Curtis Rudolph's request for ade4 tional refunds on Contract S74-29CD, it is on motion of Mr.' Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that since Mr. Rudolph did follow the County Attorney's recommendation and that he be and hereby is authorized an additional refund from connections of $13,342.55 which refund is consistent with County policy. Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Dodd. Mr. Pope states that he has contacted several adjacent landowners `M - April ``, 1977 - April 20, 1977 - April 20, 1977 - April 20, 1977 - April 20, 1977 (A copy of the roads and their descriptions will be typed in the permanent Minute Book.) Mr. Ritz presents the Board with an:annual report of the activities of the Planning Commission and the Board of Zoning Appeals. The Board commends both groups for their work. It is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that this Board accepts the report of the activities of the Planning Commission, Board of Zoning Appeals and the Planning Department for 1976. Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. It is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the State Highway Department be and it hereby is requested to accept LeMaster Road as a Rural Road Addition. Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr, Dodd. It is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the State Highway Department be and it'hereby is requested to accept Butler Road (off of Rowlett Road) as a Rural Road Addition. Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. Mr. Ritz presents the Board with copies of the updated County maps in booklet form. There is some discussion regarding sewer line extension to Loch Braemar, Section B. Mr. Welchons states he does not have any cost figures for this project. It is generally agreed that this matter be deferred until later this afternoon. After some discussion regarding Mr. Curtis Rudolph's request for ade4 tional refunds on Contract S74-29CD, it is on motion of Mr.' Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that since Mr. Rudolph did follow the County Attorney's recommendation and that he be and hereby is authorized an additional refund from connections of $13,342.55 which refund is consistent with County policy. Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Dodd. Mr. Pope states that he has contacted several adjacent landowners regarding participation in the water line extension to the Carriage Hills and Otterdale Subdivisions but none has given a firm commitment. Mrs. Girone states that the Right -cif -Way Department should have commitments by the May 16th meeting so this project can be started. Mr. Birdsong distributes a list of water projects and explains their status at the present time. Upon the recommendation of the Personnel and Salary Advisory Committee it is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the following budget amendments be and they hereby are approved: a. Appropriate $2,904.00 from the Unappropriated Surplus of the Two -Way Radio Fund (27) to Planned Budget Expense account 27-270-141.0 Technicians and increase Planned Budget Revenue account 17-000-804.0 Sale of Service by $2,904.00. b. Appropriate $792.00 from the Unappropriated Surplus of the General Fund to Planned Budget Expense account 11-101-104.0 Engineer Assistant. c. 1976-77 Budget Appropriate $1,780.00 from the Unappropriated Surplus of the General Fund to 11-017-104.0 Personnel Specialist. 1977-78 Budget Increase Planned Budget Expense account 11-017-104.0 Personnel Specialist by $11,196.00. And be it further resolved that the following actions are hereby approved as recommended; to be effective immediately: a. That the County supplement the salary of a Chief Jail Administrator by paying the difference between what the State Compensation Board will approve and $12,000 subject to this being within the existing budget appropriation. b. That the County supplement the salary of deputies by paying the difference between the State Compensation Board's established beginning salary of $7,032 and $8,040 subject to this being within the existing budget appropriation. c. That the County agrees to pay one-third of the Sheriff's proposed salary of $26,600 regardless of the amount approved by the State Compensation Board subject to this being within the existing budget appropriation. d. That an Avionics Technician, Grade 16, be hired at Step 7 of the Salary Range, subject to this being within the existing budget appropriation. e. Reclassification of one Programmer II, Grade 20 to Programmer I, Grade 18, which is to be within the existing budget appropriations. -3- f. Reclassificationobf one Programmer 11= Grad 20 to Programmer III Grade 22, which is to be within the existing budget appropriations. g. The establishment of the classification of Communications Installer/Technician at pay Grade 11; h. The establishment of one position to be allocated to the classification of Communications Installer/Technician, Grade 11. i. One additional position to be allocated to the classification of Communications/Electronics Specialist, Grade 16. J. Reclassification of the position of Mental Retardation Director, Grade 23 to Mental Retardation Director, Grade 25, which is to be within the present budget constraints and appropriations. k. That the position of Draftsman III within the Environmental Engineering Division be reclassified to Engineering Assistant I, Grade 14. 1. That the request to adjust Mr. J. P. Wright's salary be denied at this time. m. The reclassification of the Assistant Custodian Supervisor, Grade 7 to Custodian II, Grade 4, to be accomplished within current budget appropriations. n. The redlassification of Laborer III, Grade 9, Buildings and Grounds to Custodian Supervisor, Grade 9, and to be accomplished within present budget appropriations. o. All departments/agencies be notified that those persons wbo have excess leave be required to take all excess leave within twelve months of approval of this policy. p. The establishment of a Personnel Specialist, Grade 18 within the Personnel Department. q. That the County offer a Cancer Care Plan by American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus as a payroll deduction option. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. It is on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the County accept the low bid of Street and Branch, Inc. in the amount of $940 for the painting of the radio tower located at the Courthouse and further be it resolved that $940 be and it hereby is appropriated from the Unappropriated Surplus of the General Fund to account 11-140-215.0, Repairs and Maintenance. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dodd, it is resolved that the Chairman and Clerk of the Board be and they hereby are authorized to sign a Manpower Consortium Agreement with Henrico and Hanover Counties on behalf of the County of Chesterfield, which agreement -4- is for the period of Ctober 1,, 1977 through Septcber 30, 1978. Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dodd, it is resolved that the following erroneous tax claims be and they hereby are approved for payment: James T. Thacker James T. Thacker John L. Martin, Jr. David E. Hatch James T. Thacker Garrison Builders, Inc. Trans Service Corp. Garland A. Barker Fred J. Stephens Bruce H. Armstrong Kaye Daniel Paul D. Casey Erroneous Assessment for 1975 $ 28.20 Erroneous Assessment for 1974 29.14 Erroneous Assessment for 1976 26.24 Erroneous Assessment for 1976 32.64 Erroneous Assessment for 1976 99.84 Erroneous Assessment fot 1973 330.66 County License 25.00 County License 15.00 County License 15.00 County License 15.00 County License 15.00 County License 15.00 Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. It is on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs, Girone, resolved that the following requests for renewal of bingo and/or raffle permits be and they hereby are approved for a period of one year: Knights of Columbus, Council No. 6372 St. Edward's Knights of Columbus, Council No. 6546 Dale Ruritan Club Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Dodd. On recommendation of the County Attorney, it is on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that the Chairman be and he hereby is authorized to sign an agreement for the County with Shoosmith Brothers, Inc. and Quality Construction of Virginia,'Inc. for payment of $1,158.58 by the County for construction of airplane hangers at the Chesterfield County Airport to Tr 5hQCOW" �h l Ayes: Mrs. Girone., Mr. Apperson and Mr. Dodd. At the request of the School Board, it is on motion of Mr, Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resobed-that the' County Treasurer be' authorised to borrow a sum of money not to exceed $500,000 pursuant to Section 15.1-545 of the Code of Virginia for the purchase of textbooks and other instructional mate_ ials for the 1977-78 school year. Such loans or notes shall bear interest at a rate not exceeding six per centum per annum and shall be repaid within one year of their date, Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Dodd. At the request of the School Board, it is on motion of Mr. Apperson, -5- seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that the Board of Cpervisors approves the conveyance of 21.8 acres located on Krause Road, the site of the new vocational technical school, to the School Board in order that the School Board might qualify for federal funding toward construction of this school subject to the deed stating that the School Board will have the responsibility .for having the road taken into the State Secondary Road System and further that the School Board will correct any drainage problem that may exist. Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr, Bookman and'Mr, Dodd. On motion of Mr. Apperson,--seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that this Board, at the request of the School Board, increases the Title IVC portion of 1976-77 school budget by $27,105.00 for expenditures and revenues, which funds are additional monies that have been appropriated for this program. Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. Mr. Bookman introduces Mrs. King and Mr. Pinkleton, members of the Dog Committee. He states the committee met on three occasions and have made recommendations as to changes in the current laws governing the controlling of dogs and reads said changes. After some discussion of the matter it is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Dodd,. resolved that the proposed ordinance be and it hereby is referred to the Planning Commission for its recommendations. Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. It is generally agreed the request of Mr. Courtney Wells be deferred at this time. It is generally agreed the request of the County Assessor be deferred at this time. On motion of Mr. Dodd,'seconded by Mr. Bookman, it is resolved that the gamd--claim 'of Mr., -George W. Houston be and it hereby is approved in the amount of $69 for the destruction of 24 miscellaneous fowl. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that the game claim of Mr. H. E. Ward be and it hereby is approved in the amount of $17.00 for the destruction of 17 chickens. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. There is some discussion regarding the proposed ordinance on water and sewer rates and fees. Mr. Bookman states he has recalculated some figures and he has arrived at a figure differential of $2,700,000 from that presented by the Utility Department. He adds that he realizes an increase is needed, but feels a 37% increase is too much for the two utilities. Mr. Quaiff states there is some question as to if the pre -paid .connections were or were not included by, the consultants and,if they were how they were applied, in addition two projects were deleted from the report distributed by Mr. Bookman. He adds there is a call in to the consultants to verify some of this information. It is generally agreed this matter should be deferred until the consultants have contacted the County which is expected to be this afternoon. Mr. Hodge states he would like the County to modify the contract with Commonwealth Computer Advisors which woVTd`�t6'#i-&e--for a five year contract rather than seven. He adds there would be no additional monies needed. He also adds there has been some discussion regarding a. few other minor changes but if this eontract is approved it would have to be subject to the County Attorney's approval. After consideration of this matter, it is on mot an -of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the Chairman be and he hereby"'sj' authorized to sign a contract for an IBM computer from Commonwealth Computer. Advisors subject to the County Attorney's approval. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. It is on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that the Chairman be and he hereby is authorized to sign a contract with ARA Hospital Food Management, Inc. on behalf of the County of Chesterfield for services to be rendered at the Chesterfield County Nursing Home, a copy of which is filed with the papers of this Board. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. After considerable di,s_cussion regarding the request of Mr. Courtney [dells for additional parking space adjacent to the office building newly constructed on Krause Road, West, it is on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mrs. Girone, resolved that the Director of Community Development investigate the possibility of selling appropriate land to Mr. Wells for parking space adjacent to his office building.., Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. After discussion of the request of the Real Estate Assessor regarding permission for three of his assessors to drive County vehicles out of Chesterfield, it is generally agreed that this request be denied because it is not consistent with County policy. It is generally agreed the Personnel and Salary Advisory Committee will meet at 1:00 p.m. on the second Friday of every month. Mr. Manuel informs the Board that the special revenue and expenditure accounts for the Airport have been established. Mr. Manuel states Clover Hill High School is being used for the -7- summer program because its facilities are larger and are air- conditioned. Mr. Bookman inquires about the assets of the Police Retirement Fund. Mr. Ritz states that he is in the process of compiling a report on the real estate assets but that Mr. Moore handles the financial matters. Mr. Bookman asks that Mr. Moore provide the Board with a financial picture of what assets exist. Mr. Micas states the Treasurer is interested in liquidating these assts but he does want to wait until the time is right in order not to lose money. 4 -4e -G -N11 c� ,12 On mggAion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, it is resolved that/a street light at the intersection of Brentford and Stonehenge Drives, which street light meets the criteria set by the Board.of Supervisors. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill , Mrs. drone Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. OnonomA G ron s conded by Mr. Bookman, it is resolved tha at the intersection of Logan Street and Larkspur Lane which street lights meets the criteria set by the Board.of Supervisors. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. drone, Mr, Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. Mr. Dodd states that he is interested in having the old railroad bed in Chester used for as a possible by-pass for Chester. It is generally agreed that this matter be deferred until the next meeting. Mars. Giron states the van requested by the Capital Area Agency on Agin; for which the' County would contribute $1,000 ieould be for wheelchair Patients and has been requested by Dr, Wagner and the Nutrition Centers in the O nty.. She states that she has been assured this van would be well utilized in the County. Mr. Apperson states he has some reservations because he has seen so many vans riderless driving around the City and also he is not sure how this will be maintained financially by the Capital Area Agency on Aging. After further discussion of the matter, it is on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that $1,000 be and it hereby is appropriated to the Capital Area Agency on Aging for a wheelchair van to be used in the County and said funds be and they hereby are appropriated from the Unappropriated Surplus of the General Fund. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone and Mr. Dodd. Abstention: Mr. Apperson. Mr. O'Neill states the Board has been invited by the Colonial Heights Bicentennial Commission to ,attend the Fort.. Clifton Arts -Music -Crafts Festival on May 7th and 8th. There is some discussion regarding the telephone exchange "794" being a toll-free number in the entire County. It is generally agreed this matter should be investigated further. IRE On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that this Board go into Executive Session to discuss personnel and legal matters. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs . Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr, Bookman and Mr. Dodd. Reconvening: 765222 In Midlothian Magisterial District, the 1314 W. Main Pension Plan requests rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Office Business (0) of a 9.39 acre parcel fronting 1,752.63 feet on Courthouse Road, 899.76 feet on Branchway Road, located approximately 800 feet north of the intersection of these roads. Tax Map Sec. 17-13 (1) parcel 1-1 (Sheet 8). 6„4„W1A I-kE X16 44S4-1W,Id1#03 PIA"D oN q Srp+-.'a 'M u L. Mr. Timmons states that he is intereted in connectins to public water and sewer I e Mr. Balderson states that under the Utility Section in the Recommendations there was a mis- print and it would be feasible to connect rather than as is stated it would not be feasible to connect to public water and sewer, There being no opposition to this request, it is on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission.w��-� urQ }�►,�t„S y ��..��1-� b,,; (d�;uCJ caN 6�. pt4ctn pN A Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. 775035 In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Creative Displays, Inc. requests an amendment to a Conditional Use (Case Number 735013) for a Planned Development to permit outside storage in a Light Industrial (M-1) District on a 2 acre parcel fronting 260 feet on Southlake Boulevard, located approximately 1,600 feet south of its intersection with Midlothian Turnpike. Tax Map Sec. 17-10 (1) parcel 4-2 (Sheet 8). Mr. Philip Rome, attorney representing Creative Displays, Inc., is present. Mrs. Girone inquires if the brick wall that currently exists is supposed to prevent the storage area from being seen. Mr. Rome states that it is not but they will be taking care of this matter in the near future. There being no opposition, it is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. 775039 In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Simmons Realty, Inc. requests rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7) of a 140 acre parcel fronting 1,890.89 feet on Belmont Road and located opposite the Land -O -Pines Subdivision (Sanchez Road). Tax Map Sec. 65-1 (1) parcel 1 and 4 (Sheet 21/22). C, C Mr. Jim Hayes is present representing Simmons Realty, Inc. There being no opposition present, it is on motion of Mr, Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. 77SO40 In Bermuda Magisterial District, LaVerne C. Cole et. al. request rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7) of a 4.03 acre parcel, being the northern 250 feet of Lots 9 through 14, Block A, Section A of Buxton as resubdivided. Resubdivision of Tax Map 114-7 (3) lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14; Buxton, Sec. A, Blk. A, Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14. There being no opposition present, it is on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Apperson., resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Bookman. 77SO41 In Midlothian Magisterial District, Edward J. Willis, Jr. and David L. McKinney request rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7) of a 5.06 acre parcel fronting approximately 340 feet on Robious Road and located approximatley 120 feet northwest of its intersection with Wrens Nest Road. Tax Map 17-2 (1) parcels 2-1, 2-3, 2-4 and 9 (Sheet 8). There being no opposition present, it is on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr, Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. 77SO42 In Dale Magisterial District, Zane G. Davis and Henry Myers request rezoning from Residential (R-15) to Office Business (0) of a 7.2 acre parcel fronting 998.70 feet on Iron Bridge Road and located approximately 100 feet south of its intersection with Deerfield Drive. Tax Map 95-3 (2) Lots 2, 3, 4 and 5 and 95-7 (1) lot 1 (Sheet 31). Mme- Davis is present and states he is agreeable to the conditions. There being no opposition, it is on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr -10- Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. C 77SO43 In Bermuda Magisterial from Residential (R-7) fronting approximately approximately 300 feet Avenue. Tax Map 115-10 and 16 (Sheet 32). District, A.Tredway Lane requests rezoning to Office Business (0) of a 0.72 acre parcel 80 feet on West Hundred Road and located northeast of its intersection with Ecoff (2), lots 15A and 16; Snead -Curtis Lots 15A Mr. Lane is present and inquires if he can put up a tree fence in lieu of a wooden fence. Mr. Balderson states that would be allowable if the trees are close enough to act as a screen and they must be 5 ft, high. There being no opposition to this request, it is on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. 77SO44 In Midlothian Magisterial District, M. Shevel and Jean F. Siff request rezoning from Convenience Business (B-1) to General Business (B-3) of a .1.27 acre parcel fronting approximately 190 feet on Midlothian Turnpike and being located opposite of its intersection with Ruthers Road. Tax Map 18016 (1) lots 33 and 33-2 (Sheet 8). Mr. Shevel is present and agrees to the conditions recommended. There being no opposition present, it is on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr.. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. 77SO45 In Matoaca Magisterial District, Clarence G. Conner requests rezoning from Community Business (B-2) to GenerAl Business (B-3) of a 1.76 acre parcel fronting approximately 340 feet on Jefferson Davis Highway, also fronting approximately 240 feet on Milhorn Street, and located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of these roads. Tax Map Sec. 149-11 (2) lots 1, 2 and 3 Milhorn Tract, Blk. E, lots 1, 2 and 3 (Sheet 41). Mr. Conner is present to answer any questions from the Board. Mr. O'Neill states that Mr. Conner was operating this business prior to the rezoning of the County blit somehow this business was not picked up on the records. There being no opposition, it is on motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved and further that Mr. Conner's rezoning fee be refunded. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr -11- Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. (7" 77SO46 In Dale Magisterial District, John E. Dodson requests rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7) of a 86 acre parcel fronting approximatley 1,670 feet on Beulah Road and located approximately 230 feet north of its intersection with Salem Church Road. Tax Map Sec. 66-11 (1) parcel 1 (Sheet 22). Mr. Dodson states his lots are in excess of the minimum lot size required. There being no opposition, it is on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that this request be and it hereby is .approved. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. 77SO48 In Midlothian Magisterial District, Julian C. Metts requests a Conditional Use to permit the construction of a Professional Office Building in an Agricultural (A) District on a 0.66 acre parcel fronting approximately 240 feet on Forest Hill Avenue and located approximately 100 feet west of the Chesterfield County/ City of Richmond line. Tax Map 10-7 (5) lot 1; Stratford Hills, Section T, Blk. A, Lot 1 (Sheet 3). Mr. Henry Addington is present representing Julian C. Metts. There are two neighbors present who are concerned about the height of the fence, the planting to be done, the lighting and the drainage problem in the area. Mr. Addington states that the fence will be six feet tall, the planting will be done on the inside of the fence, lighting is not anticipated at this time because the office will not be opened at night, etc. Mr. Corry states a study had been completed by Kenneth Barton and Associates which will eliminate the drainage problem with an Enclosed structure and will also be taken care of during construction. There being no further questions or opposition, it is on.motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. 775050 In Clover Hill Magisterial District, E. M. Ciejeck, Inc. reuests rezoning from Community Business (B-2) to General Business N-3) Us -a 2.6 acre parcel fronting 274.31 feet on Midlothian Turnpike, also fronting 371.95 feet on Research Road and located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of these roads. Tax Map 17-9 (3) lot 16; 60 West Commercial Plaza; Sec. B, B1k. F, lot 16 (Sheet 8). Mr. Charles August, representing the owners of the Puttaway Driving Range, states his clients feel an establishment of this type will -12- reduce their business because men bring their families for a nice relaxing time at this establishment who will be bothered by the odors emanating.from this kennel, the noise will bother the golfer who is trying to improve his game, etc. Mrs. Girone states she cannot believe the dogs will make more noise than currently exists on Route 60 with the cars and trucks. She adds the adjacent land is zoned B-3 and she feels this would be an exceptionally goodlace for a kennel sal- A,%Ir *%4 v�ld� nci- A4c-+ -fie lv%eg14� , sa� 02- we L row 4 -Ae- c.�+'teNs •f -Ok* AKCA. Mr. Micas states the financial effect of a business cannot be a reason for the denying of zoning but should be based'on the health, safety and welfare of those in the area. Mr. Hancock states that other cases have been presented today and buffers were required and asks further that he be given a buffer from the kennel. Mr. Balderson states that all zoning in the area is the same acid buffers are used when separating two different districts. He adds he is sure Mr. Hughes, owner and operator of the proposed kennel, would be willing to cooperate in itny way, Mr. Hughes states there will be a fence around the kennels which will keep the dogs enclosed but there will also be an additional fence which will be slatted around the area for additional security so that the animals cannot see out and people will not be able to see in. Mr. Hughes further explains the operation of this kennel, the cost of the building, etc. After further discussion of the matter, it is on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. Mr. Ramsey presents the Board with a revised copy of the water and sewer financial situations. He states the two projects deleted were added in and the report from the consultant did not include the prepaid connections. He adds further that this is being done as a unit and it could still mean there could be cash flow problems in any of the five years for which this is projected and further that in his opinion this is not a conservative estimate for connection fees. Mr. Quaiff states he is concerned about the $200 connection fees which are still being honored and will be for years to come and he is concerned about Ettrick which repairs, replacements, etc. have not beenincluded. Mrs. Girone states the staff and consultants have given the Board their reports of what is the minimum that can be done, she feels the total as presented and is realistic and practical and adds it would be a mistake to deviate from the proposal. Mr. Bookman states there is a difference in his figures from those of the Utility Department in the amamt. of $3,600,000 �(ftcr is 'too Imuch of a disr.-cfepancy. He states that the 37% increase for the average residence is too much and he will not be able to support a resolution to this effect. After further consideration of this matter, it is on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the following ordinance be and it hereby is adopted effective on and after July 1, 1977: -13- "An Ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1975, a amended, by adding 9920-9.1, H-18.1, 20-21.1 and 20-33 through 20-55, amending 2_0-4, 20-5, 20-13, 20-15, 20-19, 20-20 and 20-21 relating generally to sewer and water rates, industrial waste discharges, industrial cost recovery and providing for a penalty." (A copy of the entire ordinance will be typed in the permanent minute book.) Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson and Mr, Dodd. Nays: Mr. Bookman because he feels the rates need to be raised but not as much as this ordinance provides for. It is on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the following ordinance be and it hereby is adopted effective on and after April 28, 1977: "An Ordinance to amend and reenact Sections 20-10 and 20-27 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1975, as amended, relating generally to sewer and water connection fees." (A copy of the entire ordinance will be typed in the permanent minute book.) Ayes: Mr, O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr, Apperson, Mr, Bookman. and Mr. Dodd. It is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the Chairman and.Clerk of the Board of Supervisors be and they hereby are authorized to accept in behalf of the County of Chesterfield a deed of dedication for a right-of-way for the road leadin,to the three -school site located in Smoketree Subdivision subject to the County Attorney's approval. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman. and Mr. Dodd. It is cn motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the Treasurer be and he hereby is authorized to negotiate a short- term loan not to exceed $2,000,000 in accordance with Section 15,1-545 and 15.1-546 of the Code of Virginia. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. Th, -,-e is some discussion regarding the extension of public sewer lines to Loch Braemar, Sec. B. by Investment Assoc. It is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved the County extend sewer lines to Loch Braemar, Section B, with refunds fro'sthe off-site extension if possible, subject to the County Attorney's approval, Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd, It is on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that this Board go into Executive Session to discuss personnel matters, Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd. Reconvening: It is on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that this Board adjourns at 6:30 p.m, until 2:30 p,m, on May 5, 1977, Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone , Mr. Apperson, Mr, Bookman and Mr, Dodd, -15- n BOARD OF SUPERVISORS A G E N D A April 27, 1977 10:00 a.m. Invocation I. Approval of Minutes (April 13th, 15th, 18th and 20th) II. Computer Contract 10:15 a.m. III. Utility Matters A. Request of Investment Associates for Loch Braemar, Section B, Sewer Extension B. Update on Carriage Hill Project C. Request of Curtis Rudolph D. Ordinance on Sewer and Water Rates IV. Community Development A. Save -Harmless Agreement for Edgehill, Section B B. Roads to be Taken into State System C. Roads Accepted into State System D. Annual Report of Activities V. Personnel Committee Recommendations VI. Bids for Painting of Radio Tower VII. Manpower Consortium Agreement VIII. Erroneous Tax Claims IX. Renewal of Bingo Permits X. Dog Committee Report XI. Settlement with Quality Construction Company XII. Request of School Board 12:30 p.m. L U N C H 2:30 p.m. XIII. Rezoning XIV. Miscellaneous Adjournment n BOARD OF SUPERVISORS A G E N D A April 27, 1977 15 2:30 p.m. XIII. Rezoning VIV. Miscellaneous Adjournment (/ 10:00 a.m,. Invocation ✓I. Approval of Minutes (April 13th, 15th, 18th a d 20th) -- ii. Computer Contract 10:15 a.m. 'LII. Utility Matters 6.-A. Request of Investment Associates for Loch Braemar, Section B, Sewer Extension ✓ B. Update on Carriage Hill Project C. Request of Curtis Rudolph r D. Ordinance on Sewer and Water Rates SIV. Community Development ..-A. Save -Harmless Agreement for Edgehill, Section B ✓B. Roads to be Taken into State System .,o' C. Roads Accepted into State System ,/D. Annual Rep of Activities -Ort � /V. a N'f Personneft Committee Recommendations ✓ VI. Bids for Painting of Radio Tower - Vii. Manpower Consortium Agreement Erroneous Tax Claims IX. Renewal of Bingo Permits �"V' X. Dog Committee Report, ✓ XI. Settlement with Quality Construction Company XII. Request of School Board a.,,SA �v � ye -e-_ T�,�bio.lCt �v J oo,ioo � seARd 12:30 p.m. `VC ZoN�� L U N C H_ ��'s"'ss Q - Pk, l �l�s ��e _ AJC, � 7v_�, 2:30 p.m. XIII. Rezoning VIV. Miscellaneous Adjournment (/ ANNUAL REPORT - 1976 PREFACE During 1976, the Board of Supervisors, Planning Commission, Board of Zoning Appeals and the Planning Department continued to work closely with developers and various citizen groups to insure that subdivisions, rezonings and other land use requests were adequately reviewed so that beneficial development would occur in the County. In addition to develop- ment review efforts, comprehensive planning goals and policies were formulated to guide Chesterfield's future development. In 1970, after the loss of 47,000 individuals due to annexation, the County had a population of over 77,000. By January 1, 1977, the County's population had increased to 127,815. The 1976 annual growth rate of 5.0% was less than the average annual rate of 7.5% since 1970. The lower rate in 1976 can be attributed to three factors including inactivity in multiple family housing development; adjustment to estimate; reflecting an estimated 250 single family housing units which were assum- ed to have been demolished between 1970 and 1977; and adjustments to estimates since 1970 upon the discovery of expired building permit records in January, 1977. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department assisted the Board of Supervisors, the Planning Commission and the Board of Zoning Appeals in all matters affecting subdivision design, site plans, rezoning, conditional uses, special exceptions, variances and General Plan matters. The office regularly compiled data for reports and response to various governmental and public requests. The Department additionally was charged with the administration and enforcement of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. In order to accomplish these responsibilities, the Planning Department is organized into the two basic divisions of Comprehensive Planning and Development Review. Personnel Besides the Director, the department employed three full time planners in the Comprehensive Division and five in Current Planning. Supportive personnel included two draftspersons and four clerical personnel. In the summer months an intern aided the Staff in the pre- paration of base maps for Dual Independent Map Encoding (DIME) financed in part by the U.S. Bureau of the Census. Another Zoning Inspector was employed in 1976, to interpret and enforce the Zoning Ordinance. An architectural historian, in the position of Planner Intern, was employed to make a study of the County which is planned for completion in early 1977. Work Activities During 1976, the Department worked on the following plans, ordi- nances, reports and studies. 1. Proposed General Plan 2000 Study toward major revision of the General Plan 1995 was continued through cooperation with the County's various departments as well as Marcou O'Leary and Associates (a con- sultant retained with funds made available through a "701" planning assistance grant from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment). The proposed plan is currently in review process by the Plan- ning Commission and the Board of Supervisors and is scheduled for public hearings early in 1977. Residential Report, 1976 The Residential Report geographically locates and describes the status of all known residential development (sub- division, multiple family and mobile home park developments) in the County. The report has benefited individuals and firms interested in performing market analysis. Land Use Report, 1976 The Land Use Report describes and geographically displays the use of land in Chesterfield prior to January 1, 1976. Acreage used by various activites (residential, commercial public, industrial, etc.) is discussed and compared to the experiences of other localities. The report is useful to individuals and firms needing information on land use trends. Community Development (CD) Projects Through a grant awarded in FY75, the County has completed two sewer projects, advertised for bids on a third and is nearing completion on a survey of water and sewer needs and costs within existing subdivisions on a County -wide basis. The County applied but did not receive additional funding in FY76. In 1977, the County will apply for FY77 CD funds; if funded, compliance with HUD regulations will require Planning Staff to work on environmental assess- ments, full application submittal, refinement of the Housing Assistance Plan, and filing of an annual report as well as other administrative responsibilities. Capital Improvements Program (CIP) Planning Staff assumed a large proportion of administrative responsibility for the County's first Capital Improvements Program. The program provides scheduling of capital improvements for which a near term need (six year period) is anticipated in accordance with estimated costs and the County's fiscal ability to finance the improvements. The program can successfully aid public decision making and lead to a more informed citizenry on govern- mental intent. The CIP should be very useful if a general obligation bond issue is proposed to fund some of these projects. Industrial Development During the course of the year, the County has consulted with numerous industries, two of which (Instrument Techni- cal Representatives and Hetra Corporation) have bought parcels at the County's Airport Industrial Park, while others have located elsewhere in the County (Mitchell Well and Pump, Richmond Cold Storage, etc.). A profile of Chesterfield County relative to prospective industry was updated and given to the State Division of Industrial Development while an expansion of this description for County use will be completed in early 1977. The Department additionally is creating a parcel file of all the land available to industrial development as well as an inventory of existing industry to aid in recruitment procedures. 2. Chesterfield County 1976 Annual Report Describing the services pro- vided by the individual County departments, the report consumed a large amount of Staff time in 1976. It was the first such report since the late 1960's. Area Transportation Studies: RRATS and TCATS: Planning Staff continues to maintain data an ile annual reports for the Richmond Regional Area Transportation Study (RRATS) and the Tri -Cities Area Transportation Study (TCATS). County Priority Highway Needs Planning Staff developed a program .for highway projects which was endorsed by the Board of Supervisors and submitted to the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation. An update for January 1977 is underway. The intent of the report is to allow VDH&T to become more responsive to the County's needs. Highway Funding Process In October, 1976, a report, relating to the State Highway funding process was submitted to the Board of Supervisors. Status of Projects Specifically Requested by the Board The Planning Department issues this monthly report to report t e status on special projects or problems which District Supervisors have brought to the attention of the Planning Staff. Community Parks Plans were prepared and bids received for expansion of the facilities at Ecoff, Ettrick,Harrowgate and Matoaca Parks. Tennis and basketball courts should be available by summer 1977. Enon Park The state and Federal governments notified the County that they would provide up to $168,000 to assist in the acquisition of the Enon Park property. The County Attorney has proceeeded with condemnation proceedings. A boundry survey and topographic information have been compiled for the proposed park site and a schematic development plan prepared. Recreational Facilities At Schools The Department,in conjunction with the County School Board and Recreation Department, provided additional active recreational facilities at Chalkley Elementary School (1 football and 2 baseball fields), Harrowgate Elementary School (1 baseball and improvement of the existing baseball field) and Robious Junior High School (improvement of the existing football field and the initial planning for enlarging an existing baseball field). Dale Park The Department worked with the School Board.and the Recreation Department to develop the recreational layout for the new Courthouse High School. The facilities under construction include one .football stadium and track, three football practice fields, three basketball courts, nine lighted tennis courts, three varsity baseball/softball fields and four little league baseball fields. If construction continues on schedule, these facilities could be available to the public by Spring, 1978. School Site Selection In August, 1976, the School Board requested the Department to evaluate potential school sites. Working with the County Assessor, Engineering and Health Departments, the Department prepared 3. preliminary evaluations on 37 parcels of land. Information was compiled on public utilities, land values, drainage, soil conditions, topography and access for use in locating the new schools planned under the 1976 school bond issue. Site Plans During 1976, a total of 104 site plans were reviewed for commercial, industrial and institutional uses which compared favorably to the 101 reviewed last year. Over half of these site plans represent- ed new commercial, industrial or institutional activity in the County. These new uses consisted of small retail outlets, churches, rescue squads, public utlities (such as C&P and VEPCO) and various industrial facilities. Fifty-two of these new uses are either occupied or under construction. Among the most significant new developments are Safeway warehouse and division offices on Route 10 east of Chester, Mitchell Distributing Company (construction equipment sales company on Route 10 east of Chester), Richmond Cold Storage on Route 10 east of Chester (the first phase of a planned 170 acre industrial park) and Ginter Hall South (a home for senior citizens with a planned population of 166 located on Mall Drive east of Chesterfield Mall). Historic Inventory Beginning in June, 1976, the County engaged an architectural historian to inventory Chesterfield's early buildings and historic sites. Through collaboration with the Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission, the survey entails preparation of maps, photographs drawings, architectural descriptions and historical data which will be deposited in a series of several hundred individual files. This data will enable the County to make decisions concerning significant buildings and historical sites that might otherwise go unnoticed and thus be unwittingly destroyed. Zoning Inspection Plan A comprehensive Inspection Plan has been formu- lated and implementation began in early fall. The County is systemati- cally inspected for zoning violations, with a primary purpose of reducing the number of infractions along major and minor arterials. Close atten- tion is given to junk motor vehicles and signs. Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Text Amendments In 1976, a number of amendments to the Zoning Ordinance were adopted. Although no amendments were made to the Subdivision Regulations, one is pending for 1977. The Board of Supervisors passed major revisions to the sign regulations; increased zoning and site plan fees; required that a Special Exception be obtained for landfills in Residential and Agricultural Districts;and required that a Conditional Use be obtained for Adult Book Stores, Theatres and Massage Parlors in General Business (B-3) Districts. Zoning Ordinance Summary This summary, as used by the County's Boards., Planning Commission and Planning Staff, allows quick determination of the required zoning for specific land uses. Animal Control Report The Board of Supervisors appointed a committee chaired by Mr. C. L. Bookman, Clover Hill District Supervisor, to study and make recommendations on the County's animal control ordinances. Staff has attended several community meetings, prepared various reports and charts and supplied the Committee with other pertinent information. 4. Inspection/Enforcement During 1976, the Department reviewed 3,632 building and occupancy permits as compared with 3,497 in 1975. Staff traveled 42,584 miles working on various activities, 14,247 miles of which were traveled investigating 398 zoning violations. In 1976, approximately 35% more violations were investigated than in 1975. This increase was due primarily to the employment of an additional inspector and somewhat to the implementation of the Planning Department's Zoning Inspection Plan. A total of 342 violations were resolved with only 48 cases to begin the 1977 investigations. Approximately 71 inspections were required for failure to renew expired permits, Special Exceptions for businesses and mobile home permits. Fees collected in 1976 totaled $46,369.82 as compared with $36,571.55 in 1975. MAPPING COMPLETED --Proposed General Plan 2000 -Land Use and Public Facilities (Scale: 1"=40001) Map Titles for General Plan 2000 (Scale: 11= 2 1/4 miles) 1. Existing Land Use 1975 2. Community Identity and Sectors and Corridors 3. Mineral Resources and Identified Faults 4. Historical Sites and Structures and Distinct Environmental Areas 5. Major Noise Generators 6. Current Transportation Plans 7. Park and Open Space Plan as adopted 4/11/74 8. Fire Station Plan as adopted 8/8/73 9. Schools and Libraries and Solid Waste Facilities 10. Public Sewerage Plan 11. Public Water 12. Drainage Areas 13. Transportation Plan Highways 14. Transportation Plan Bus Transit --Public Sewerage (3/19/76) Map shows existing and proposed lines and service areas and plants. Scale: 1" = 4000' --Public Water Service (1/21/76) Map shows existing and projected water lines, storage tanks and treatment plants. Scale: 1" = 4000' --Census Tracts 1980 (6/7/76) Scale: 1" = 4000' --Solid Waste Study (11/19/76) Scale: 1' = 2 1/4 miles --County Soil Map suitability for septic tanks (12/76) Scale: 1'= 4000' --County Airport Industrial Park Scale: 11= 200' --Proposed Courthouse Master Plan Scale: 1"= 200' Looking Ahead Planning by its very nature is a continuing task. In the coming year, it is anticipated that activities of the governing body, along with its Commission, Boards, Staffs and individual citizens, will be continued within the general frame work of past years. Many of the planning projects will be advanced toward completion. The Staff 5. C will be involved in the following plans, reports and studies. --Regional Planning District Studies --Evaluation of Bus Transit Park and Ride Facilities --Collector Street Planning --Annual Update of the Richmond Regional Area and Tri -Cities Transportation Plans --Plan Maps and Policies for County Planning Areas and Corridors --Current Land Use and Residential Report Update --Continuation of the Comprehensive Planning Process --Community Development Program Participation --County-Wide Vacant Land Study --Highway Transportation Program --Aid in Preparation of School and Library Location Plans as Requested by their respective Boards --Compilation of original Zoning Ordinance (1945) with Amendments to 1977 --Acquisition of Land and Preparation of Construction Plans for the Proposed Enon Park and a New Landfill Site --Expansion of Presrn t Park and School Recreational Facilities --Creation of an Industrial Parcel File --Recruitment of Industry --Compilation of a Profile of Chesterfield County for Prospective Industry --County Annual Report --Participation in the Water Quality and Coastal Zone Management Planning Processes --Semi-Annual Estimates of Population --Completion of Geographic Base File for the Dual Independent Map Encoding System --Preparation of Historic Sites and Places Report --Preparation of Grant Applications 6. PLAONNING COMMI S S ION The regulation of the use of land in order to safeguard and enhance the welfare of the people is vested in State Government. Under this authority, the State authorizes local governing bodies the right to regulate within reason the use of property within their jurisdictional boundaries. In order to assist the Board of Supervisors in this responsibility, the Board appoints the Planning Commission which is composed of a citizen representative from each magisterial district and a Supervisor. It is the Commission's responsibility to examine land use requests in light of their effect on the County and make recommendations accordingly. The Planning Commission considers and makes recommendations to the Board of Supervisors on all rezoning and conditional use requests. The Commission additionally acts as the Board's agent in matters concerning land subdivision. The Planning Department, Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors reviewed and acted on 69 rezoning requests in 1976 (including requests that were withdrawn and deferred to 1977), as compared to 64 reclassifications in 1975. ZONING REQUESTS - 1976 Action Magisterial District County j Total Bermuda Clover Hill Dale Matoaca Midlothian Approved 18 16 5 9 8 56 Disapproved 2 0 0 0 3 5 Withdrawn 3 1 1 0 2 7 Deferred to 77 0 0 1 0 0 i 1 Total 23 17 7 9 13 69 DISTRICTING IN ACRES - 1976 Zoning Districts Magisterial District County Bermuda Clover Hill Dale Matoaca Midlothian Total R-40 5.93 5.93 R-25 451.37 21.0 12.66 485.03 R-15 (0.95) 29.61 279.28 14.19 327.13 R-12 100 37.00 137.00 R-9 265.00 25.0 45.00 335.00 R-7 (19.14) (9.80) 192.80 21.05 21.21 206.12 R-TH 14.6 ( 28.27) (13.67' MH -1 MH -2 A (279.91) (734.92) (154.80) (346.33) (105.10) (1621.06) B-1 (0.8) (0.80)', B-2 (11.50) 29.00 (.09) 1.74 19.15 B-3 44.31 0.60 .091 1.50 46.50 B -T M-1 (38.0) (38.00) M-2 185.61 185.61 m-3 i 0 0.79 2.24 3.03 ' * Figures in ( ) are losses. 7. Zoning In regard to zoning trends, a newly emerging pattern of residential development could be observed in 1976 with a significant increase in residential rezoning in the south central and southern portion of the County. Specifically, the area northwest of Matoaca and areas directly west of Pocohantas Park became centers of new residential rezoning activity. Approved residential zoning accommodating the development of Chesdin Heights, Nash Grove, Tekewood, Dance Estates and Hunters Green subdivisions typified residential rezoning activity in the Matoaca area. Rezoning and the development of Amber Wood, Plantation Trace, Deerwood, Hanbury Forest and Quail Hollow subdivisions occurred west of Pocohantas Park. While Brandermill moved rapidly ahead in residential development in 1976, the areas of central and north central Chesterfield (due to the extension of utility lines) accommodated additional development with the rezoning for Reams Run, Walton Park, the Bonarco Property and Sunnybrooke Acres. The year's largest single residential rezoning occurred in June when the Board approved the request of Nuggett Virginia Land Company for the rezoning of property comprising the Kingsland Acres development tract. This parcel contains 366 acres and was rezoned to the Residential (R-9) classification. Perhaps the most controversial residential rezoning request was that initiated by Lauck Associates. The Applicant's request for rezoning to Residential (R-7) of a 100 acre parcel adjacent to and east of Hidden Valley Subdivision resulted in controversy among the residents of Hidden Valley and Chester Subdivisions, as well as property owners in the vicinity of Baldwin Road. Concern was expressed on the compatibility of development as well as street access by means of existing stub roads in adjacent develop- ed areas. In May the Board, upon recommendation of the Planning Commission, resolved to approve an amended application to rezone the subject property to Residential (R-12). Although not a condition of zoning, all parties understood that consideration would be given to reasonable distribution of both housing construction and resulting residential traffic. Most notable in requests for Conditional Use Planned Development was the proposed land use for the remaining property in the Bexley Project, located north of Route 360 near its intersection with Lockhardt Road. In August, 1975, and again in October, 1976, Mr. Wallace H. LaPrade received approval from the Board of Supervisors for rezoning and development of approximately 116 acres which is planned for residential and commercial uses. Construction was proposed for single family homes in clusters on the north- eastern portion of the tract and a recreational facility, hostelry and office building complex on the west and central portions of the parcel. Site development architecture and the plan of operation is intended to preserve and maintain a rural residential atmosphere for the project. This project along with the previously approved. Conditional Use Planned Develop- ment of Brandermill has set a tone for the type of land use controls and resulting development which may be desirable =or the Route 360 corridor. In keeping with this controlled development philosophy, the Board approved rezoning to Community Business (B-2) for property located adjacent and southwest of the intersection of Route 360 and Courthouse Road. This application, by Luther L. Caudle and Edward J. Bell, to develop the parcel for Rockwood Square Shopping Center was approved subject to several condi- tions relating to traffic control and aesthetics. 8. On August 15, 197, the Board granted Conditio.,al Use approval to Frank L. Holt which will allow the construction and operation of the County'ssecond dinner theatre. The facility is intended to be developed on a parcel fronting the north line of Midlothian Turnpike west of Mid- lothian Village. Through the rezoning to the Office District of the parcel of land at the northwest corner of Bon Air and Robious Roads, the County set a prece- dent for the restriction of commercial development northwestardly along Robious. The Robious-Huguenot League of Civic Associations worked closely with the Applicant, Roger D. Burde, in arriving at an understanding to accommodate the interest of both the Applicant and area residents. This rezoning marked the first time the newly approved Office Business (0) classi- fication was utilized. Other significant zoning cases included a request by Shoosmith Brothers, Inc., which was approved to establish the first privately owned and operated sanitary landfill in the County. Also, on April 28, 1976, the Board grant- ed approval of a request by W. S. Carnes, allowing occupancy of six exist- ing multiple family dwellings which he had built as an intended first phase of Kerneybrooke Apartments. This project had been a matter of continued applications and litigation for the past five years. Subdivision The Planning Commission granted tentative approval to 114 subdivisions in 1976 and 68 subdivisions were recorded, representing 1,965 single family lots (including R-TH lots). These figures show an increase from 1975, when the Planning Commission granted tentative approval to 82 sub- divisions and 42 subdivisions were recorded representing 1819 single family lots. New subdivisions reviewed and granted tentative approval by the Commission were Afton, Brookwood Estates, Cedar Acres, Chesdin Heights, Colebrook, Court Ridge, Dance Estates, DeBoer Subdivision, Deerwood, Dense Wood Hill, Donegal Forest, Five Springs, Fox Chase, Genito Forest, James River West Estates, Kenilworth, Kingsland Estates, Loch Haven,McTyres Cove, Meadwood, Nash Grove, Nuttree Woods, Plantation Tract, Pleasant Ridge, Shady Creek, Sherwood Hills West, Tomahawk, Tomahawk Terrace, Trabue, Tremont, Trents Farm, Turnerville Acres, Up -Away and Walton Park. These new subdivisions represent 3,592 building lots with 2,848 lots using County Utilities, 184 lots using County water and individual septic tanks and 560 lots utilizing individual wells and septic tanks. BOARD OF ZONING, APPEALS The Zoning Ordinance establishes regulations which are applicable to most situations. However, due to unusual circumstance and unique character- istics affecting certain properties, a Board of Zoning Appeals is necessary to interpret and modify the Ordinance when the situation warrants. The Board, appointed by the Circuit Court, has administrative and quasi-judicial powers enabling the authorization of variances from the applications of the Ordinance. The Board additionally acts on Special Exceptions for purposes specified by the Board as well as hears anv appeals by the Director of Planning on the intrepretation of the Zoning Ordinance. 9. `� On December 7, 1976, Vice -Chairman, B. Chewning Watkins resigned after serving the County for six years. The Circuit Court appointed John C. Watkins as his replacement. Central Virginia Educational Television Corporation's request for a Special Exception and Height Variance to erect a 1199 foot trans- mission tower was the Board's most significant and controversial case during the past year. After considerable discussion and testi- mony from a variety of experts in the aviation and communication fields, the Board denied the request. Board members were reluctant to approve a tower of such height because of possible hazards to planes using the Chesterfield County Airport and the possible adverse impact on future expansion of the Airport facility. Upon denial, WCVE reapplied requesting the same Variance and Special Exception. In January, 1977, WCVE and the opposition compromised by agreeing on a 999 foot tower, which the Board later approved. During 1976, the Board approved 55 requests to permit the operation of a business within a dwelling in a residential district; 175 Special Exceptions to permit the parking of a mobile home in an Agricultural (A) District; and 57 Variances from the rules and regula- tions of the Zoning Ordinance. 10. M PLANNING COMMISSION Mr. Elbert Howard, Chairman Mr. Lawrence R. Belcher, Vice -Chairman Mr. C. L. Bookman Mr. C. F. Currin Mr. T. T. Crump Mr. H. Vernon Williams Mr. M. C. Ritz, Secretary BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Mr. Aubrey W. Gill, Chairman Mr. N. M. Collier, Jr., Vice -Chairman Mr. L. H. Beazley, Jr. Mr. J. L. Biggs Mr. J. C. Watkins Mr. S. R. Balderson, Jr., Secretary PLANNING STAFF 15 Mr. Michael C. Ritz, Director of Community Development Mr. Stanley R. Balderson, Jr., Chief of Development Review Ms. Sandra K. Bennett, Clerk -typist Mr. Garland W. Edwards, Draftsperson Mr. Richard M. Flaherty, Planner II Mrs. Beth Kemp, Secretary Mr. Jeffrey M. O'Dell, Planning Intern Mrs. Janet G. Pagans, Clerk -typist Mr. William D. Poole, Senior Planner Ms. Sheila R. Reid, Draftsperson Ms. Beverly F. Rogers, Zoning Inspector Mr. James M. Schiavo, Zoning Administrator Mr. Chesteen L. Smith, Planner II Mr. Dexter R. Williams, Planner/Engineer Mr. James P. Zook, Chief of Comprehensive Planning 11. �J REVIEW OF WATER PROJECTS April 26, 1977 I. Projects Approved and Funded 1. Courthouse Road South of Chestnut Hills $ 5,000 2. Shawonodasee Road 11,900 3. Dowd Lane Well System 20,000 4. Carriage Hill - Otterdale 128,600 Total Projects Approved and Funded $165,500 II. Projects Approved But Not Funded 1. Huguenot Road (Route #147) $ 35,000 2. Jessup Farms - Poindexter Road 4,000 3. Woodpecker Road 13,000 4. Hylton Park 78,100 LM. Total Projects Approved But Not Funded $130,100 III. Necessary and Obligated Projects Not Funded A. Miscellaneous Work at Tanks and Pumping Stations 1. Elkhardt Tank(overflow piping) $ 12,000 2. Pocono Tank(fencing and landscaping) 3,000 3. Dutch Gap Tank(fencing and landscaping) 3,000 4. Rockwood Park Pumping Station(fencing) 2,000 B. Matoaca Area Water Line Replacement 60,000 Total Necessary and Obligated Projects Not Funded $ 80,000 IV. Summary Total Projects Approved and Funded $165,500 Total Projects Approved But Not Funded 130,100 Total Necessary and Obligated Projects Not Funded 80,000 TOTAL WATER PROJECTS $375,600 Anticipated monthly revenue per connection a 51,16 Ati'TICIPATED ANN7JAL REVENUE 5 connections x $1.16 per month x 12 = $69.60 Project Name: Courthouse Rd, south of Chestnut Hills Esti=ated Water main Cost: $4,250.00 Estimated Meter Installation Cost: 750.00 Total Estimated Cost of Project: 52000.00 5 Connection fees @ $3 50 each ¢ $12750.00 Connection fees @ _each = Total connection fees o $1,750.00 Total County Expenditures = 3,250.00 Interest for 1 year @ 67. _ $ 195.00 ESTD'.=.TED MONTHLY REVENUE Average Monthly water bill (8000 Gal/month) Q $7.17 Water production Cost ($0.22/1000 Gallons) a 1.67 5.50 Other Operating Costs = 3.66 Debt Service ($0.085/1000 Gallons) X1. a 0.6884 Anticipated monthly revenue per connection a 51,16 Ati'TICIPATED ANN7JAL REVENUE 5 connections x $1.16 per month x 12 = $69.60 m ESrNv7r Ct, �'dU,PTyOI�SE RDA.O �',�'rE/YS/a/� r Project Name: Shawonodasee Road Estimated Water main Cost: Estimated Meter Installation Cost: Total Estimated Cost of Project: 9 Connection fees @ 500 each ._ $4$00 Connection fees @ -each.- ach-Total Totalconnection fees = . Total County Expenditures Interest for 1 year @ 6% _ $444.00 ESTIMATED MONTHLY REVENUE Average Monthly water bill (8000 Gal/month) _ $7.17 Water production Cost ($0.22/1000 Gallons) = 1.67 5.50 Over head (Reading, billing, Etc.) = 3.66 1.84 Debt Service ($0.085/1000 Gallons) = 0.68 Anticipated monthly revenue per connection $1.16 ANTICIPATED ANNUAL REVENUE 9 connections x $1.16 per month x 12 = $125.28 $10,550 1,350 11,900 4,500 7,400 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ,9 /ZS L.F /2 �►/C _W/L �Q�/¢s= Cx �,F _ 7 stP : i Z re< en I POCAHONTAS ��; �t•� STATE DARK `1 ►1 ! 'f, ,..w fes, pent G. F = �`//� 604. � 9 d II \ i coo• � ,:, ...... �o 3 So • . N A?. 4 Z.9 Si? j Totem[ 8 i ; I , 6 E'n.t I2 �v+ct "'tA- �L .oe4r el J P � o► - tkt t77 % 17G1D L F. Qt 6 A�C Y!�/L8.t r -- 4,r /(0 704 • — s:#w / � • � �,� "�„ � peme DAuost■Ic- - SECTIDN • I . Y Project Name: Dowd Lane Well System Esti=ated Water main Cost: $17,360.00 Esti=ted Meter Installation Cost: 2,640.00 Total Estimated Cost of Project: 20,000.00 24 Connection fees @ $3 50 each 8,400.00 ' Connection fees @ _each a Total connection fees 8,400.00 Total County Expenditures $112600.00 Interest for 1 year @ 6% = 696.00 ESTL`_ATED MON7HLY REVENUE Average :Monthly water bill (8000 Gal/month) a $7.17 Water production Cost ($0.22/1000 Gallons) a 1.67 5.50 Other Operating Costs 3.66 51.84 Debt Service ($0.085/1000 Gallons) a 0.68 Anticipated monthly revenue per connection a $1.16 A!,TICIPATED AhT'UAL REVENUE 24 connections x $1.16 per month x 12 - $ 334.08 Y oa levo vvg4z s y.s rgm Project '.lame: Carriage Hill - Otterdale Esti=ted Water main Cost: $123,650.00 Esti.:.ated Meter Installation Cost: 4,950.00 Total Esti ated Cost of Project: $128,600.00 33 Connection fees @ $3 50 each $11,500.00 Li Connection fees @ $2 00 _-each a 9,400.00 Total connection fees = 20.900.00 Total County Expenditures = $107,700.00 Interest for 1 year @ 67. = 6,462.00 YONTTHLY REVENUE Average 'mthly water bill (8000 Gal/month) _ $7.17 Water production Cost ($0.22/1000 Gallons) 1.67 5.50 Other_ Overating Costs s 3.66 1.84 Debt Service ($0.085/1000 Gallons) a 0.668 Anticipated monthly revenue per connection $1.16 A!7- 1CIPyTED ANT NITUAL REVENUE 80 connections x 51.16 per month x 12 $1,113.60 `ad 0 CARRIAGE- HILL_QTTERDAL� M B. When the County entered into a contract with the Developer for the installation of water facilities in Chesterfield Mall Shopping Center, the County agreed to install a 16" water line along Route #147 from Olde Coach Drive to the shopping center. The Developer is to pay one-half the cost of this extension. Estimated Cost = $35,000.00 Developers Cost = 17,500.00 County's Cost = 17,500.00 m ,00>i- C4.6C W DQ, I I Q �1 0 h r 3 m �Nonv�Nl� CtNTft� vi CI N1?"Y "DL`E-TC N P.jo &7c.aL.E- Go© To WocLw►onp Project ha=e: Jessup Farms - Poindexter Road Esti.:ated Water main Cost: $3,400.00 Esti_ated ?feter Installation Cost: 600.00 Total Esti=ated Cost of Project: 42000.00 4 Connection fees @ 5 00 each — $2,000.00 Connection fees @ each — Total connection fees.-. $22000.00 Total County Expenditures. =: $22000.00 Interest for 1 year @ 6% 120.00 ESTD' -0 'MZTHLY REVENUE. Average Konthly water bill (8000 Gal/month) s $7.17 Water production Cost ($0.22/1000 Gallons) a 1.67 5.50 Other Operating ACosts a 3.66 1.84 Debt Service ($0.085/1000 Gallons) a 0__68 Anticipated monthly revenue per connection - $1.16 AN_7ICT9=.TED ANMAL REVENUE: 4 connections x $1.16 per month x 1Z. — $55.68 L m C: m Project :lame: Woodpecker Road Esti_:ated Water main Cost: (16") $12,550.00 Estiated Meter. Installation Cost: 450.00 Total Estimated Cost of Project: $13,000.00 3 Connection fees @ $3 50 each m 13050.00. Connection fees @ _each = Total connection fees w 1,050.00 Total County Expenditures $ 11,950.00 Interest for 1 year @ 6% = 717.00 ESTI!-L-'.7_'D MONTHLY REVENUE Average Monthly water bill (8000 Gal/month) a $7.17 Water production Cost ($0.22/1000 Gallons) 1.67 5.50 Other Operating Costs 3.66 1.84 Debt Service ($0.085/1000 Gallons) a 068 Anticipated monthly revenue per connection a $1.16 A_N.71CIPA' ED A'L%7\,TAL REVENUE 3 connections x $1.16 per month x 12 $41.76 M 0 WOODPECKER RD. EXTENSION-. fir' Project Name: Hylton Park Esti-ated Water main Cost: $662700.00 Esti.::ated Meter. Installation Cost: 11,400.00 Total Estimated Cost of Project: 78,100.00 76 Connection fees @ $5 00 each,- 38,000.00 Connection fees @ each a Total connection fees 38,000.00 Total County Expenditures s 40,100.00 Interest for 1 year @ 6% 23406.00 ESTTEMATED MONTHLY REVENUE Average Monthly water bill (8000 Gal/month) _ $7.17 Water production Cost ($0.22/1000 Gallons) a 1.67 5.50 Other Operating Costs M 3.66 1:84 Debt Service ($0.085/1000 Gallons) 0.68 Anticipated monthly revenue per connection $1.16 AIMCIPATED ANNUAL REVENUE 76 connections x $ 1.16per month x 12 m$ 1,057.92 Note: This proposal is from the future section of Hylton Park to be installed by the Developer. A. In order to meet the conditions set forth in the special exceptions made by the Board of Zoning Appeals, the protection of County property, and promises made to adjacent property owners allowing the County to con- struct Elkhardt, Pocono, Dutch Gap Tanks, and the Rockwood Park pumping station; the following work must be done: 1. Elkhardt Tank - construct overflow pipes into underground storm sewer system on existing tanks. Estimated Cost: $12,000.00 2. Pocono Tank - Landscaping and fencing. Estimated Cost: $3,000.00 3. Dutch Gap Tank - Landscaping and fencing. Estimated Cost: $3,000.00 4. Rockwood Park Pumping Station - Fencing. Estimated Cost: $2,000.00 n MATOACA AREA WATER LINE REPLACEMENT Estimated Cost - $60,000 LOCATION IF MATOACA it w APPOMATTOX VICINITY RIVER M M 1 TS G??tI:`iE:1T, iaa�le this ZSth.__.._ day of � i _ 19 77 vy C. Porter Vaughan, Jr., President, C. Porter Vaughan, Inc. (hEc�i.oaft-c r_ referred to as "Developer"),, and the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, (here :inafter referred to as the "County"). W I T N E S S E T II: That 'Whereas, the County is experiencing rapid urbanization; and Whereas, urbanization creates a demand .for residential and commercial U. property; and t�Ehereas, the orderly development of land enhances the safety, health and welfare of the community at large; and Whereas, the County has required the dedication and recordation of certain drainage easements within a particular development hereinafter named, the plat of which is dated , Sept. 16 , 19 76 , which plat is hereby incorporated by reference into and made a part of this Agreement; and Whereas, these easements do not intersect or connect with a natural watercourse; and Whereas, the Developer and the County recognize that it is to the benefit and need of the community that such easements do intersect with a natural watercourse; and Whereas, the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Higfivays, has adopted as a requirement for the acceptance of new roads of new subdivisions into the secondary system of highways that there shall be provided a continuous drainage easement from a proposed drainage facility to an intersection with a natural watercourse; and 'dhereas, both the Developer and the County acknowledge that this standard is desirable to assure safe thoroughfare for the 'traveling public. M M Now, Therefore, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein- after stipulated to be %ept and performed, it is agreed between the parties hereto as follows: 1. The County will obtain now or at such future time as it may become necessary, in the opinion of the County, an adequate drainage easement from those points within the subdivision designated as: Old Girl Scout property now owned by the Edgehill Company. The exact location will be designated at such time as this land is subdivided in the near future. at which points drainage exists at the subdivision boundaries to a point which intersects with a natural watercourse. 2. The Developer will: A. Pay all the costs of acquisition of such drainage easements as may become necessary for the County to acquire in connection with the subdivision set forth above. B. Save_ and hold harmless the County of and from any and all claims, loss or expense for taking and/or damaging property from any and all landowners who are adversely affected by such drainage notwith- standing any such acquisition as may be required under paragraph "A" above; however, when such acquisition has been fully constructed to County and Highway specifications and accepted this obligation shall terminate and be Pull and void. C. Provide the legal defense of the County, at its cost, if any s•.:ch claim or claims are made. D. Reir6 urse the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of 1?i,.':;a�,5, for repairs to roadways damaged as a result of a lace of an adequate drainage easement to an approved watercourse as determined by the County. 3. Special Provisions: (See letter from Alfred J. Dickinson, Jr. on behalf of The Edgehill Company) A. This agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the developer. In witness Whereof, the County of Chesterfield has caused this agreement to be executed pur^u--!: to resoIntion duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors on the 2 1 day of r't p r f L 19 "72 , by E. Merlin O'Neill, Chairman, and attested to by the County. Seal affixed by C. G. Manuel, Clerk, all in accordance with the said resolution which is in full force and effect; And the Developer has caused its name to be hereunto signed by its President and its Seal hereunto affixed and attested by its Secretary, pursuant to resolution duly adopted by its Board of Directors, a copy of which resolution is attached hereto and is in full force and effect. COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA f � By .�_ Chairman, toard of Supervi ors Attest: C. PURI " AUGHAPT INC. f. Attest: STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY/CITY OF , to -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 19 , by E. MERLIN O'NEILL and C. G. MANUEL, Chairman and Clerk, respectively. 19 Given under my hand this day of My commission expires: Notary Public TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SUBJECT: ROADS TO BE TAKEN INTO THE STATE SECONDARY SYSTEM ITEM NO. Edgehill - Section B - Iron Mill Road - Beginning at its intersection with State Route 2651 easterly to its intersection with Old Camp Road thence easterly to State maintenance. Old Camp Road - From its intersection with Iron Mill Road northerly to a temporary turnaround. 03. JOHN E. RARWOOD, COMMISSIONER - �Iy,r d� DQNL LEONARD R. HALL, BRISTOL, BRISTOL DISTRICT / n HORACE G. FRALIN, ROANOKE,.SALEM DISTRICT THOMAS R. GLASS, LYNCHBURG, LYNCHBURG DISTRICT MORRILL M. CROWE, RICHMOND, RICHMOND DISTRICT �o WILLIAM T. RODS, VO R KTO WN , .SUFFOLK DISTRICT DOUGLAS G. JANNEY, FREDERICKSBURG, FREDERICKSBURG DISTRICT RALPH A. BE ETON, FALLS CHURCH, CULPEPER DISTRICT ROBERT S. LANDES. STAUNTON, STAUNTON DISTRICT gqq /p�� VIRGINIA y/®d-iL9' ONWEAL H of V IRGINIL L COMMONWEALTH T. RAY HASSELL, III, CHESAPEAKE, AT LARGE -URBAN CHARLES S. HOOPER, JR., CREWE,AT LARGE -RURAL W. S. G. BRITTON DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER LEO E. BUSSER III DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION J. M. WRAY, JR. DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS J. P. ROYER, JR. DIRECTOR OF PLANNING P. B. COLDIRON DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING H. R. PERKINSON, JR. DIRECTOR OF PROGRAM MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS & TRANSPORTATION 1221 EAST BROAD STREET IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO RICHMOND, 23219 April 20, 1977 C" Secondary System Additions Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County Chesterfield Court House, Virginia 23832 Gentlemen: As requested in resolutions by your Board on August 11, 1976 and February 17, 1977, the following additions to the Secondary System of Chesterfield County are hereby approved, effective April 1, 1977 and April 20, 1977. ADDITIONS LENGTH �T. BLANCO SUBDIVISION (EFFECTIVE APRIL 1, 1977) Vogt Avenue - Beginning at its intersection with Saffron Lane northerly 0.17 mile to a temporary turnaround. 0.17 Mi. Saffron Lane - Beginning at its intersection with Route 746 easterly 0.06 mile to its intersection with Vogt Avenue thence easterly 0.01 mile to a dead end. 0.07 Mi. POPLAR GROVE (EFFECTIVE APRIL 20, 1977) Poplar Grove Road - Beginning at its intersection with Millridge Parkway easterly 0.03 miletD its intersection with Poplar Grove Road, thence easterly 0.17 mile to its intersection with Poplar Grove Place, thence southerly 0.18 mile to its intersection with Poplar Grove Terrace, thence westerly 0.03 mile to its intersection with Poplar Grove Court, thence westerly 0.06 mile to its intersection with West Poplar Grove Road, thence northerly 0.20 mile to its intersection with Poplar Grove Road. 0.67 Mi. West Poplar Grove Road - Beginning at its intersection with Poplar Grove Road westerly 0.08 mile to its intersection with Millridge Parkway. 0.08 Mi. TRANSPORTATION - AMERICA'S LIFELINES - 2 - M M ADDITIONS CONTINUED LENGTH POPLAR GROVE CONTINUED Poplar Grove Court - Beginning at its intersection with Poplar Grove Road northerly 0.05 mile to a cul-de-sac. 0.05 Mi. Poplar Grove Terrace - Beginning at its intersection with Poplar Grove Road southerly 0.03 mile to a cul-de-sac. 0.03 Mi. Poplar Grove Place - Beginning at its intersection with Poplar Grove Road westerly 0.08 mile to a cul-de-sac. 0.08 Mi. 'WINTERBERRY RIDGE SUBDIVISION (EFFECTIVE APRIL 20, 1977) Winterberry Ridge Beginning at its intersection with Millridge Parkway westerly 0.06 mile to its intersection with Winterberry Ridge, thence westerly 0.22 mile to its intersection with South View Lane, thence southerly 0.06 mile to its intersection with Winterberry Terrace, thence southerly 0.14 mile to its intersection with Winterberry Court, thence easterly 0.18 mile to its intersection with Hickory Nut Point, thence northerly 0.07 mile to its intersection with Winterberry Ridge. 0.73 Mi. South View Lane - Beginning at its intersection with Winterberry Ridge northerly 0.05 mile to a temporary turnaround. 0.05 Mi. Hickory Nut Place - Beginning at its intersection with Hickory Nut Point westerly 0.04 mile to a cul-de-sac. 0.04 Mi. Winterberry Terrace - Beginning at its intersection with Winterberry Ridge easterly 0.06 mile to a cul-de-sac. 0.06 Mi. Winterberry Court - Beginning at its intersection with Winterberry Ridge southerly 0.04 mile to a cul-de-sac. 0.04 Mi. Hickory Nut Court - Beginning at its intersection with Hickory Nut Point northerly 0.03 mile to a cul-de-sac. 0.03 Mi. Hickory Nut Point - Beginning at its intersection with Winterberry Ridge southerly 0.08 mile to its intersection with Hickory Nut Place, thence southerly 0.10 mile to its intersection with Hickory Nut Court, thence southerly 0.05 mile to a cul-de-sac. 0.23 Mi. OLD FOX TRAIL (EFFECTIVE APRIL 20, 1977) �Old Fox Court - Beginning at its intersection with Old Fox Trail southerly 0.04 mile to a cul-de-sac. 0.04 Mi. %W - 3 - `'0 ADDITIONS CONTINUED LENGTH OLD FOX TRAIL CONTINUED Old Fox Trail - Beginning at its intersection with Millridge Parkway easterly 0.19 mile to its intersection with Old Fox Trail, thence northerly 0.25 mile to its intersection with West Old Fox Trail, thence southerly 0.11 mile to its intersection with Old Fox Court, thence easterly 0.04 mile to its intersection with Old Fox Trail. 0.59 Mi. West Old Fox Trail - Beginning at its intersection with Old Fox Trail westerly 0.05 mile to its intersection with Millridge Parkway. 0.05 Mi. BRANDERMILL PARKWAY (Effective April 20, 1977) Y Brandermill - Beginning at its intersection with Old Hundred Road southerly 0.47 mile to its intersection with Millridge Parkway, thence westerly 0.11 mile to a temporary turnaround. 0.58 Mi. Millridge Parkway - Beginning at its intersection with Old Hundred Road (relocated) westerly 0.76 mile to its intersection with Old Fox Trail, thence northerly 0.25 mile to its intersection with West Old Fox Trail, thence northerly 0.13 mile to its intersection with West Poplar Grove Road, thence northerly 0.07 mile to its intersection with Winterberry Ridge, thence northerly 0.18 mile to its intersection with Poplar Grove Road, thence northerly 0.25 mile to its intersection with Brandermill Parkway. 1.64 Mi. Sincerelly,,�- : 41 J.4 _Utc W. S. G. Britton, Deputy Commissioner and Chief Engineer Copies: Mr. W. P. Tucker Mr. J. P. Mills, Jr. Mr. A. S. Brown Mr. L. E. Brett, Jr. Mr. L. H. Dawson, Jr. Mr. E. L. Covington, Jr. - Chesterfield April 21, 1977 TO: Board of Supervisof�" FROM: Michael C. Ritz,girector of Community Development SUBJECT: Annual reporting of activities State Law requires that the Planning Commission and the Board of Zoning Appeals annually report their activities. The attached report represents the activities of the Commission, Board and the Planning Department for 1976. Please accept our report; we think it represents a considerable amount of work by eleven citizens and our paid staff. MCR:bk ATTACHMENT m 1976 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE rI CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD INTRACOUNTY CORRESPONDENCE April 22, 1977 TO: Bob Galusha Lane B. Ramsey 040 FROM: Lan y SUBJECT: Personnel Committee Action The recommendations of the Personnel and Salary Review Committee will require the following budget amendments: Suggested Resolution: On motion of , seconded by it is hereby resolved that the following budget amendments are approved: 1. Appropriate $2,904.00 from the Unappropriated Surplus of the Two -Way Radio Fund (27) to Planned Budget Expense account 27-270-141.0 Technicians and increase Planned Budget Revenue account 27-000-804.0 Sale of Service by $2,904.00. 2. Appropriate $792.00 from the Unappropriated Surplus of the General Fund to Planned Budget Expense account 11-101-104.0 Engineer Assistant. 3. 1976-77 Budget Appropriate $1,780.00 from the Unappropriated Surplus of the General Fund to 11-017-104.0 Personnel Specialist. 1977-78 Budget Increase Planned Budget Expense account 11-017-104.0 Personnel Specialist by $11,296.00. TRR/1--i M M MINUTES PERSONNEL AND SALARY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Personnel and Salary Advisory Committee meeting 1:00 P.M., April 19, 1977 MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. E.M. O'Neill Mrs. J.C. Girone Mr. C.G. Manuel Mr. R.B. Galusha AGENDA ITEM #1: Sheriff Wingo asked the Committee's consideration of the following requests: a. That the County supplement the salary of a Chief Jail Administrator by paying the difference between what the State Compen- sation Board will approve and $12,000; b. That the County supplement the salary of Deputy's by paying the difference between the State Compensation Board's established beginning salary of $7,032 and $8,040; c. That the County agree to pay one-third of the Sheriff's proposed salary of $26,600, regardless of the amount approved by the State Compensation Board. nTcrIICCTnN- In regard to AGENDA ITEM #la, Sheriff Wingo explained that he would have to hire a Chief Jail Administrator in at $7,032, until trained, at which time the individual would be advanced to $8,040. He felt that he could convince the Compensation Board to classify this posi- tion at a Captain rank which would mean a salary of $9,540. The Sheriff felt that considering the type of person he would need for this particular job he would not be able to successfully recruit at this salary. Therefore, he was asking the Board to assume the diff- erence between 2/3 of $9,540 and $12,000 or approximately $5,668. AGENDA ITEM #lb was an effort on the part of Sheriff Wingo to create an incentive and increase the desirability of acquiring a position in the Sheriff's Department. The beginning salary for all deputies is set at $7,032, after attending school they are elevated to $8,040. Generally deputies spend an average of 3 months before attending school. The Sheriff is requesting that the Board supplement this salary to the extent of the difference between $7,032 and $8,040. He feels that with the supplement he could get better personnel and keep them longer. AGENDA ITEM #lc by the Sheriff was a request that the Board grant an exception to the normal policy of paying 1/3 of the salary as approved by the Compensation Board by assuming 1/3 of $26,600 as proposed by the Sheriff in his 1977 - 78 budget. In effect the County would be paying 1/3 of $26,600 vs. 1/3 of $19,000, or $8,778 vs. $6,270. The Sheriff based his justification on the fact that the Compensation Board will accept the Taylor Murphy Institute Report for census pur- poses, and based on this report the population and arterial highways of the County justifies a top Sheriff salary of $30,000. COMMITTEE ACTION: The Committee recommended approval of all requests by Sheriff Wingo within existing budget appropriations. AGENDA ITEM #2: Request from Mr. Parker, Airfield Manager, that.he be authorized to hire an Avionics Technician, Grade 16, at Step 7 of the salary range. nBC11SSION: Mr. Parker has reviewed all applicants for the existing vacancy and has determined that only one of the applicants which responded is qualified. However, he would not accept the position at the entry pay level (Step 1). Mr. Parker feels that this person,considering his expertise and nine years of valuable experience, would enhance the revenue producing capability of the airport by being able to assume more business and being able to respond to customers more effectively and efficiently. This individual is currently at $12,000 and we would have to offer him an incentive to make a move, hence the request to go to Step 7 ($12,936). COMMITTEE ACTION: The Committee recommended approval within existing budget appropria- tions. AGENDA ITEM #3: Request from Mr. Hodge, Data Processing to reclassify the following positions: a. One Programmer II, Grade 20 to Programmer I, Grade 18; b. One Programmer II, Grade 20 to Programmer III, Grade 22. m SCIJSS I ON : This request was as a result of a management analysis by Mr. Hodge of existing organization. The positions to be reclassified are currently vacant. The reclassification action was a combination of position requirement vs. utilization of existing personnel based upon ability to perform. Presently Mr. Hodge has an incumbent in a Systems Analyst n M II position who is marginally effective to ineffective. A valuable position is being denied Mr. Hodge, yet the incumbent is of considerable value to Mr. Hodge, to the extent that he cannot afford to be without him, hence the reclassification of one of the Programmer II positions to Programmer III. Additionally this will enhance the career progression ladder in this department. COMMITTEE ACTION: The Committee recommended approval of these reclassification actions within the constraints of existing budget appropriations. AGENDA ITEM #4: Request from Mr. Monroe, Senior Electronics Communications Specialist, to establish the following positions: a. Communications Installer/Technician, Grade 11; b. Communications/Electronics Specialist, Grade 16. nTcM1Y;TON: Mr. Monroe, Chief of the Communications/Electronics Section had discussed his shortage of personnel at an earlier communications meet- ing between Mr. Manuel, the fire department, and police department. It was the concensus of that group that the Communications/Electronics Section was inadequately staffed and Mr. Monroe's action for the Personnel and Salary Advisory Committee was a direct result of that meeting. Mr. Monroe presented job descriptions for both positions. COMMITTEE ACTION: The Committee recommended: a. The establishment of the classification of Communications Installer/Technician at pay Grade 11; b. The establishment of one position to be allocated to the classification of Communications Installer/Technician, Grade 11; c. One additional position to be allocated to the classification of Communications/Electronics Specialist, Grade 16. AGENDA ITEM #5: Mr. Wynne, Chapter 10 Administrator, requested Committee consideration and concurrence of the following request: Reclassification of the position of Mental Retardation Director, Grade 23 to Mental Retardation Director, Grade 25. M DISCUSSION: n Mr. Wynne explained that at the time of establishment of this position the Services Board recommended a pay grade based on its best estimate of the job requirements and responsibilities at that time. Since that time, it has been determined that the responsibilities and duties of this position are much greater than envisaged, and therefore, the Board is convinced that the pay grade should be appropriately upgraded in order to be more commensurate with those responsibilities and duties. COMMITTEE ACTION: The Committee recommended approval within present budget constraints and appropriations. AGENDA ITEM #6: Mr. Ritz, Community Development, requested Committee consideration and concurrence for the following actions: a. Reclassification of one Draftsman III, Grade 12 position to Engineering Assistant I, Grade 14; b. Adjustment of salary for Mr. J.P. Wright, Office of the Building Official. DISCUSSION: Reference AGENDA ITEM #6a, Mr. Ritz's request for reclassification was as a result of a position/job analysis conducted which resulted in a restructuring of his organization. Task assignments and responsibili- ties had changed to such an extent that the incumbent occupying the Draftsman III position was doing very little drafting. The majority of his work doing those responsibilities more appropriately associated with the Engineering Assistant I classification. This would require an additional appropriation of $792. Reference AGENDA ITEM #6b, Mr. Ritz felt that Mr. J.P. Wright had been acting as Building Official in the absence of Mr. McBride, conse- quently he should be compensated in accordance with County policy. He requested that such compensation be effective March 30, 1977. COMMITTEE ACTION: The Committee recommended: a. That the position of Draftsman III within the Environmental Engineering Division be reclassified to Engineering Assistant I, Grade 14, and that $792 be appropriated for this expense; b. That the request to adjust Mr. J.P. Wright's salary be denied as requested as Mr. Wright was not occupying a vacant position, the M position was not vacant until Mr. McBride was transferred to the Assistant Building Official position, which occurred on April 15. Mr. Wright's salary will be adjusted May 15 in the event the position remains vacant. AGENDA ITEM #7: Mrs. Firesheets, General Services, requested the Committee's concurrence and consideration for the following actions: a. Reclassification of one Assistant Custodian Supervisor, Grade 7 to Custodian II, Grade 4; b. Reclassification of Buildings and Grounds Laborer III, Grade 9 position to Custodian Supervisor, Grade 9. nTcCtISSTON: This request was as a result of minor reorganization of the custodial work force. The reorganization eliminated the need for the Assistant Custodial Supervisor position, however, as there was a need for the manpower the position was downgraded. The reclassification from Laborer III to Custodian Supervisor was a title change only as the Laborer III has, in fact, acted as the custodial force supervisor. COMMITTEE ACTION: The Committee recommended: a. The reclassification of the Assistant Custodian Supervisor, Grade 7 to Custodian II, Grade 4; b. The reclassification of Laborer III, Grade 9, Buildings and Grounds to Custodian Supervisor, Grade 9; c. All actions to be accomplished within present budget appro- priations. AGENDA ITEM #8: Mr. Galusha, Personnel Department, requested consideration and con- currence on a recommended procedure for reducing the amount of accu- mulated leave in excess of that authorized by the County's leave policy. DISCUSSION: The recommendation was originally proposed by the Personnel Committee on February 7, 1977. The Board rejected the initial proposal as it did not provide a time period for persons who have excess leave to use up such leave. This recommendation was changed so as to allow the persons affected 12 months from approval of this policy to use leave in excess of that authorized by County policy. M COMMITTEE ACTION: The Committee recommended that all that those persons who have excess excess leave within twelve months AGENDA ITEM #9: M departments/agencies be notified leave be required to take all of approval of this policy. Mr. Galusha, Personnel Department, presented to the Committee for its concurrence and consideration his request that he be authorized an additional position to be classified as Personnel Specialist, Grade 18. nTSCIISSION: Mr. Galusha pointed out that the need for an additional person to handle certain specialized personnel programs was recognized in June of 1976 when he was authorized to hire a CETA employee. This employee was responsible for developing a viable OSHA program, a program here- to -fore managed by the Police Department. Additionally this employee established an effective program for managing, monitoring and reporting of data required under the State Workmen's Compensation Act. Additionally, Mr. Galusha elaborated upon other programs and responsibilities of the position and proposed future applications of the skills required for this position. If approved by the Board of Supervisors the Personnel Depart- ment would require an additional appropriation of $12,724. COMMITTEE ACTION: The Committee recommended that the request for the establishment of a Personnel Specialist, Grade 18 within the Personnel Department be approved, and that necessary funds be appropriated to the Personnel Department for this action. (May and June, 1976 at $10,680 and 1977- 78 at $10,944.) AGENDA ITEM #10: Mr. Galusha, Personnel Department, requested the Committee's concurrence and consideration for a proposal by the American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus to offer a Cancer Care Plan to employees of Chest- erfield County as a payroll deduction option. DISCUSSION: This request/proposal was initiated earlier in 1977 by a field repre- sentative of American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus. Pre- liminary investigation of the plan revealed that the School Board offered the plan to school employees as did our Health Department. The plan was highly recommended by Dr. Wagner. The provisions of the plan were ex- plained at a staff meeting and department directors were asked to survey their employees to determine interest. The results of the survey indi- cated that there were sufficient interest to justify offering it as a payroll deduction. COMMITTEE ACTION: The Committee recommended that the Board authorize the County to offer the Cancer Care Plan by American Family Life Assurance Company of Colum- bus as a payroll deduction option. All actions are to be effective.on Board of Supervisors approval. Mr. R.B. GaIusha Recorder/Secretary Mr. E.M. 0 Neill Chairman 0 CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT HENRICO-CHESTERFIELD-HANOVER CONSORTIUM October 1, 1977 - September .30, 1978 i;VENT BY AND BETWEEN THE COt7NTIES OF HE ICO, CHESTERFIELD 7 ?-IANOVER, VIRGINIA, REGARDING THE OPERATION OF A COMPREHENSIVE EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING PROGRAM UNDER THE AUSPICES OF A TRI -COUNTY CONSORTIUM. This agreement, entered into as of the 1st day of October, 1977, by and between, the Counties of Henrico, Chesterfield, and Hanover (including the Town of Ashland), Virginia. DEFINITIONS: References are made to Federal Regulations published June 25, 1976, S( :.tion 94.4: l,) "Prime Sponsor" shall mean a unit of government, combinations of units of government, or a rural Concentrated Employment Program grantee, as set forth in Section 95. 3, which has entered into a grant with the Department to provide comprehensive manpower services under Title I of the Act. 2. { "Consortium" shall mean an entity formed by an agreement among local units of government, consistent with the requirements of Section 95. 3, to plan and operate a comprehensive manpower program under the Act. 3.) "Chief elected official" and "chief executive officer" shall include their designees. 4.) Under these Federal Regulacions Section 95. 3 (a) Prime Sponsors are: (3) (i) Consortia consisting of gener=al local governments which are (A) located in reasonable proximity to each other; (B) each of which retains responsibility for operation of prog ram; (C) at least one (1 ) of which has a population ,.�f 100, 000 or more persons; and, (D) which, as a consortium,, can }plat: and operate a comprehensive manpower program tn,at rrovides administrative and programmatic advantage over the other methods of delivering services under the Act. WITNESSETH THAT: 1ul-TFu r -1a c the C_'onoress of the United States has passed legislation and t!,� 1-,L-esident of the United States has signed into law, the Comprehensive Employrzent and TyLlr.-ir-g Act of 1973, (CETA), and WHEREAS, the Counties of Henrico, Chesterfield and Hanover, Virginia have been designated as a Prime Sponsor Consortium by the U. S. Department of L,auc,r under t:_is Act, and WHEREAS, this desig tion would permit efficient ana' conomical management of the delivery of Manpower Services in a manner designed to meet local needs and accountable to local elected and appointed officials, and WHEREAS, the area consisting of the Counties of Henrico, Chesterfield and Hanover, for the purposes of this program, is an appropriate grouping of governmental subdivisions, being contiguous and sharing like concerns, and WHEREAS, for these and other reasons it is appropriate that the afore- mentioned governmental subdivisions included in the tri -county Consortium territory provide jointly for the planning and delivery of Manpower Services through a multi -jurisdictional agreement, and WHEREAS, Section 15. 1-21, Code of Virginia, specifies that Counties may enter into agreements with one another for joint or cooperative exercise of any power, privilege:z, or authority each is capable of exercising severally, and WHEREAS, the Boards of County Supervisors of these Counties acting independently have authorized the execution of such agreement .f, -)r the purpose of joint and cooperative planning and delivery of Manpower Services, and WHEREAS, the Counties of Henrico, Chesterfield and Hanover do now mutually desire to provide said planning and delivery under the auspices of a tri -county Consortium and through the means of a Comprehensive Employment and Training Program under the prime sponsorship of HENRICO, CHESTERFIELD AND HANOV ER COUNTIES. 111;OW, THIEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually convenant and agree as follows: 1.) Application for Designation and Grant. Henrico County, Chesterfield, County, and Hanover County have applied for, and received, designation as a Prime Sponsor of CETA to serve the Henrico, Chesterfield, Hanover area, and, shall apply for grants and Federal funds to operate such CETA Programs. 2.) Statutory Authority of the Signatures. Title 15. 1, Chapter 12, Article 1, Code of .Virginia, describes Henrico, Chesterfield and Hanover Counties as being units of general local government with the power to levy taxes, spend funds and as having general corporate and police powers. Section 15. 1-21, Code of Virginia, specifies that these Counties may enter into agreements with one another for joint or �t cki, ,erative exercise of any power, privileges, or authority each is capable of exercising severally. 3.) Powers and Limitations of the Prime Sponsor. The Prime Sponsor Consortium shall have the power to contract with County, State or Federal agencies for the delivery of Manpower Services as deemed appropriate, and to enter into agreements with appropriate State and Federal agencies to receive funds to adequately carry out the purposes of the program. Acts of the Consortium will be in response to policies established by the Policy Committee, who shall establish policy and act upon Planning Council recommendations. Any obligation, either expressed or implied, incurred by the Prime Sponsor through this agreement to provide Manpower Services to residents of the Counties of Henrico, Chesterfield and Hanover, is expressly limited to the extent that such services can be provided by means of and under the terms of such CETA rants and other grants, as shall be received by the Prime Sponsor from the Department of Labor and other agencies. 4. ) Determination of Policy and Priorities. The policy governing planning .trrd delivery of Manpower Services under the said CETA Grants and the priorities E::,, erring provision for and delivery of services shall be determined by a Policy Committee as created by the several jurisdictions signatory to this agreement, The Policy Committee sh;.11 develop policies and act on Planning Council xecor7�ii (:nd Rion 'file CEITA Administrator of the lienrico-Cliesterfield-Ilan..)ver Ccnsort:um : s;oonsible to the Policy Committee for the implementation and operation (, the CETA .'rogram. 3.) Composition of the i?c)licy Committee. The Chairman of the Boards; of County Supervisors, one other Board member and the chief executive officer from er1 it 'u. d;: tion L hall be members of the Policy -:;ommittee. They shall decide among themselves which of them will serve as Chairman of the Policy Committee for the first year. Succeeding terms shall be for a period of one year. The I,1ljor (1(oillj llt-o 111vill1wrs will serves as First Vico- Chairllla n, 'Sck, id VII. -L.- 1 1. 11111.4141 I IS . 1 til III.+ I " I I I % V l 10111111111 t'tt ill .3 111,11111t11, (11:1( (lltly 1l4'l%"1111111. .11tH -111' n n n.,liticnl jurisdiction, the other Board mernber to serve on the Policy Committee. 6. ) Procedure for Action by Policy Committee. The Policy Committee shall meet regularly, but not less frequently than quarterly, and on call by the Chairman. A quorum shall consist of one (1) of the representatives from each participating County. Voting shall be on an individual basis with only those being present allowed to vote. A majority vote of those present shall be decisive on each issue. The Policy Committee may adopt additional rules and regulations for its proceedings to the extent that they are not contrary to those set forth herein. 7.) Provision for Staff Support and Planning Council. The CETA Staff of the Prime Sponsor, being funded through a portion of the funds granted to the Prime Sponsor of the CETA Program, shall provide staff support to the Policy Committee and is responsible to the Committee for program execution and management. The Policy Committee shall also establish a Planning Council. It is the function of the Planning Council to submit recommendations regarding program plans and basic goals, policies, and procedures, to monitor and provide for objective evaluations of employment and training programs conducted in the prime sponsorship area, and to provide for continuing analyses of need;; for employment, training, and related services. Any final decision with respect to such recommendations shall be made by the Policy Committee. Membership on the Planning Council shall consist of: three (3) local government representatives (Personnel Officers or equivalent); five (5) private employer representatives; three (3) public education representatives; three (3) vocational education/ train:Gng facility representatives; three (3) client community representatives; two (2) labor/ appronti..-:ship represeiitdtives; oae (1) employment service representative; three (3) Social Service representatives; three (3) public/private non-profit agency representatives; one (1) neighboring Consortium representative (RAMPS); and one (1) Governor's Manpower Services Council representative (ad hoc member). 8.) Duties and Ite::ponsibilities of the CETA Staff. Though administratively responsible to Henrico County under a single merit based personnel system, the CI;TA Administrator is functionally responsible to the Policy Committee. The CETA Administrator, in accordance with guidelines established by the Policy Committee, will administer programs, make recommenclations for new programs, negotiate contracts and sub -contracts, actively seek and obtain additional sources of funding for Manpower related programs from local, State and Federal sources, continuously monitor, evaluate and take corrective action pertinent to all sub.• contractors operating programs under the grant agreement, and make a report of status, progress, and recommendations on all programs operating under this brant to the Policy Committee and Region III, United States Department of Labor. 9.) Accountability and Authority. The jurisdictions acknowledge that the Prime Sponsor is ACCOUNTABLE to the Employment and Training Administration of the Department of Labor for grants and contracts and for the performance of any sub -contracts. The jurisdictions acknowledge the authority of the Prime Sponsor through the CETA Administrator to monitor, evaluate, and take corrective action concerning performance specified in the CETA grant and cotltracts or agreements negotiated pursuant thereto. 10.) Allocation of Funds. Such Federal funds as will be granted to the Prime Sponsor shall be expended for the mutual benefit of residents of the several jurisdictions signatory to this Agreement without regard to place of residence, except as determined by any allocation formula which may be adopted by the Policy Committee or required by Federal regulations. Although every attempt will be mads to 3xpend allocated funds, no programs will be forced on political jurisdictions participating in this Agreement should such jurisdiction deem that such programs would be detrimental to the overall best interests of its particular jurisdiction. ,L�✓ision of Local Share. Nothing contained in this Agreement or in regulations adopted by the Policy Committee pursuant to this Agreement shall be construed to require either of the several Counties to provide any financial or other resources in cash or in-kind, for the operation of the Manpower Program beyond such Federal funds as may be allocated to the Prime Sponsor for the delivery of Manpowe r services. To the extent that the Manpower grants require matching ,:.ortributions from local sources in cash or in-kind, it shall be a management responsibilit} of the Prime Sponsor to develop sources of such contributions. The Prime Sponsor Policy Committee may request provision by the several jurisdictions of in-kind facilities or services. In the event that none of the participating jurisdictions participate directly in furnishing such local share, as may be required by the Manpower grants, the Prime Sponsor shall endeavor to obtain said local sharp; through its organization and management of various sub -contracts for Manpower Training and Services. 12.) Acquisition of Property. The Prime Sponsor may acquire such real and/or other property as is permitted by terms of its grants from the Department of Labor, and shall hold such property for the use of the Manpower Programs; during, the term of such grants and subsequent grants. Upon the termination of such grant or subsequent grants, all property will be disposed of in a manner consistent with said grant or grants and appropriate Federal and local regulations provided, however, that any property loaned or contributed by the jurisdictions to the operation of the Manpower Program shall, upon termination of this Agreement, revert to the jurisdiction making said loan or contributions. 13.) Names and Addresses of Signatory Governments: Henrico County P. O. Box 27032 Richmond, Virginia 23273 Chesterfield County Chesterfield Courthouse Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Hanover County Hanover Courthouse Hanover, Virginia 23069 14.) G,_oeiap1dt:a1 Areas. The geographical areas to be served under this Agreement include the entire jurisdictions signatory to this Agreement. 15.) Population. Henrico County Chesterfield County Hanover County 16.) Consortium Prime Sponsorship. 188,106 127,815 49,782 Henrico County has been and continues %e tD be an independently eligible Prime Sponsor, having a population in excess of 188, 106 individuals as of January 1, 1977. Chesterfield County is now also an independently eligible Prime Sponsor, having a population in excess of 127, 815 individuals as of January 1, 1977. _ 17.) Administrative Arm. All grant Agreements with the United States Department of Labor, for the purposes of carrying out they provisions of the , Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973 (CETA) shall be signed k,y the chief administrative officer of Henrico County, which is hereby designated the Administrative Arm for the Consortium. 18.) Organization of Juriiadictions. Henrico, Chesterfield and "Hanover Counties are units of local government described in Title .15. 1, Chapter 12, Article 1, Code of Virginia. Each is governed by a Board of County Supervisors, with one (1) member representing each magisterial district. The Chairman of the Board is selected by his fellow supervisors and serves in this capacity for a period of one (1) year. Supervisors are elected every four (4) years. The chief administrative officer of each County is the County Manager or County Administrator. He carries out the policies of the respective Boards of County Supervisors and has chief responsibility for the operation of all County services and functions. Each department in the County government structure has a department head. lie functions under and reports to the County Manager or Administrator. The department head is responsible for all sections in his department. 1q.) 1'1annitig Council membership Selection and -man). The CETA Administrator will serve as Chairman of the Planning Council and will make recoinmer:uati.ons to the Planning Council for appointments to membership on that Council. The Planning Council will vote to approve or disapprove such nominai;ions and the Policy Committee will confirm each appointment. The Council may appoint subcommittees as appropriate to carry out its responsibilities under Section 104 or the Act. 20.) Termination of Agreement. This Agreement shall be in continuous effect from the date first stated above through September 30, 1978. 21. ) Additional Covenant. This document is in no way to be construed a;s an indication of a joint effort on the part of the several jurisdictions in any matter other than that which is expressly indicated in other sections. Furthermore, the parties hereto individually covenant and agree that this Agreement shall not tie introduced or referred to in any future proceeding, judicial or otherwise, concerning a change in the geographical boundaries of any party hereto. n COUNTY OF HENRICO County Manager Approved as to Form: County Attorney COUNTY OF HANOVER County Administrator Approved as to Form: :,purity Attorney 6 r - COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD Coun,fy Admiriisor Approved as to Form: County Attorney ' 1 / PRIME SPONSOR ORGANIZATIONAL CHART HENRICO-CHESTERFIELD-HANOVER CETA CONSORTIUM Henrico County Chesterfield County Hanover County T is I X - - I . �-o I CETA Administrator Policy Committee and Staff Planning Council Sub -Committees LEGEND Policy Direction --------- Coordination -x -x -x -x- Administrative Control ' K of �tnigl�% u� Cllulumb u� ST. ANN'S COUNCIL, No. 6372 Colonial Heights, Virginia 23834 April 8, 1977 Office of the County Administrator County of Chesterfield Chesterfield Virginia, 23832 Subject:- Bingo and/or Raffle License The enclosed check in the amount of $10.00 (Ten Dollars) is sent to cover the renewal fee for a license to conduct Bingo and/or Raffle games. Council #6372 of the Knights of Columbus is a charitable service organization. All net proceeds from Bingo and/or Raffle games will be used to finance charitable, community -oriented or council social functions. Sincerely, Emil A. Marx, Grand Knight 11717 Elmwood Lane Chester, Virginia 23831 Pe,ggy,M., Firesheets BOUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD interim' Director DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERCES General Services POST OFFICE BOX 40 CHESTERFIELD. VIRGINIA INVITATION # 77-10204-3307 DATE 4/5/77 . 1: Sealed bids, subject to the specifications and conditions contained herein and attached hereto, will be received at the above office until, but not later than J�L9QLM., Local Time Prevailing, April 20 -, 19--71--_, and then publicly opened and read for Painting Radio Tower Your quotation to be considered must be submitted on copy of this Invitation to Bid in the places provided. Bidders must sign this form and send to the above address with Invitation Number marked on outside of envelope. A.. t.;.d . a;voa nfior fho nnneuneed time and date of onenina, whether by mail or otherwise, will not be considered. ITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT COMMODITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT To furnish all materials and labor necessar to scrape, sand, and paint one (1) 165 ft. Radio Tower as per the following specifi- cations. Tower shall be scraped thoroughly to re- move all rust, rust flakes and scales. Such spots shall receive one coat of approv d rust resistant undercoat. Tower shall be painted with two (2) coats of No. TTE489 White and No. TTE489 Inter- national Aviation Orange (Avolite Nos.), or approved equal. All paint must be in accordance with FCC regulations. Total Bid Price $ Requirements: Certificate of Insurance will be required by successful bidder. rnn All prices shall be F.O.B. County of Chesterfield, Chesterfield Courthouse, Chesterfield, VA 2383 Our terms are . (If this blank is not filled in, it is understood that a discount of 2% is allowed for payment by the 20th day of the month following date of delivery.) Please indicate earliest delivery date as this may be a factor in making award, In compliance with the above Invitation to Bid # 77-10204-3307 , and subject to all conditions thereof, the undersigned offers and agrees to furnish any or all of the items and or services upon which prices are quoted, at the price quoted for each item, complete, and delivered as specified. NAME OF BIDDER OFFICIAL TITLE ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE TELEPHONE NO. NAME (TYPE OR PRINT) THE COUNTY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AWARD IN PART OR IN WHOLE. OR TO REJECT ANY OR ALL BIDS. THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED. L Peggy M. FiresheetsCOUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD INVITATION Interim Director DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES 77-10204-3307 General Services POST OFFICE BOX 40 DATE CHESTERFIELD. VIRGINIA 4/5/77 Page 2 ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COMMODITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT NO. Please contact Mr. Sam Burkholder (804)748- 1340 for inspection of tower. Bids shall be returned in the enclosed self-addressed envelope. If Bid Documents must be returned in a larger envelope, pleas affix orange envelope to outside. If you desire not to quote on this invi- tation, please forward your acknowledgement of NO BID. Failure to comply will be cause for removal of your company's name from the bid list for subject commodity. PDM/ j hr b U D rn a� -qIT1 --4 �-A DM y r- 12 Y1 t7 rrn to v ,O 'v M H o 0 H M H o w a b n lT7 d a N FJ - Id D U) 0 P IQ En r+ Q, Allied Paint Company 908 Jefferson Davis Highway Richmond, Virginia 23224 M. P. Barden & Sons, Inc. 5780 Hull Street Road I Richmond, Virginia 2322.4 c John C. Baucom, Jr. 12100 Petersburg Street .� Chester, Virginia 23831 Bridgforth Construction Co. P. 0. Box 543 Farmville, Virginia 23901 c _ Brook Hill Construction Corp 1220 Mountain Road Richmond, Virginia 24017 R. L. Bulifant & Company, Inc 2713 Decatur Street Richmond, Virginia 23224 Century Construction Co., In, 3808 Augusta Avenue Richmond, Virginia 23230 Chapman & Martin, Inc. P. 0. Box 688 Farmville, VA 23901 City Wide Decorators, Inc. 409 Fast Laburnum Avenue Richmond, Virginia 23222 b U D rn a� -qIT1 --4 �-A DM y r- 12 Y1 t7 M M b ,O •v M < P► c z O C) U1 nc -� M r -r b O 1 33 a "i m M Zf a N tr \ Q. 0. V p, f4 V V 'd M �j `! WIDN rt N nA+ Commercial Painting & Decorat: 4111 Forest Hill Avenue Richmond, Virginia 23225 Davis Brothers Const. Co., Ini 275 East Ladies Mile Road Richmond, Virginia 23222 1 Frick, Vass & Street, Inc. P P. 0. Box 9065 13 West Clopton Street ,I, Richmond, Virginia 23225 Glidewell Brothers, Inc. C P. 0. Box 24369 Richmond, Virginia 23224 C H & D Coatings, Inc. G P. 0. Box 393 Carlisle,PA 17013 Harris Brokerage Company 20603 Matoaca Road Petersburg, Virginia 23803 Bobby Lee's Painting Service 53 Slagle Avenue Petersburg, Virginia 23803 George E. Mowbray, Jr. Paint & Wallpaper Co. 1324 North Boulevard Richmond Virginia 23230 W. W. Nash & Sons, Inc. �J 1400 Brook Road — Richmond, Virginia 23220 C G a i, tri b z • y 'L � a D rt O n z - z v O :4 H H M tr w a H a z H .d A v M t rl CJ D � P3 M Lf) w �L w rID o H. N LIN 1% V •� V as p v w q . p n tr • Jimmie Scott 2321 Fourth Avenue Richmond, Virginia 24013 State General Contracting 112 N. Boulevard Richmond, Virginia 23226 Street & Branch, Inc. 5202 Hull Street Road 1 Richmond, Virginia 23224 C S. P. Terry, Painting &-5-eco' 517 W. 7th Street Richmond, Virginia 23224 C L. K. Vass, Inc. 11 West 21st Street Richmond, Virginia 23225 W. C. Wiltshire & Son Painting Contractors 2700 Susten Court Richmond, Virginia 23224 St. Edward's Council 6546 Knights of Columbus Frank Tamberrino Grand Knight 3500 Margate Drive Richmond, Virginia 23235 Bon Air, Virginia 23235 Rev. Raymond T. McIntyre Chaplain 2700 Dolfield Drive Bon Air, Virginia 23235 April 19, 1977 Office of the County Administrator County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Re: St. Edward's Council #6546 Gentlemen: John A. Toups Financial Secretary 11831 Olde Coach Drive Midlothian, Virginia 23113 We currently have a permit for Bingo and/or Raffles from the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County which expires on April 24, 1977. We wish to renew this permit for an additional year and we are enclosing a check for $10.00 to cover this fee. We appreciate your cooperation and assistance in renewing this permit so that we can continue to operate. Very truly yours, Frank Tamberrino Grand Knight n BOARD OF SUPERVISORS E. MERLIN O'NEILL. CHAIRMAN MATOACA DISTRICT JOAN GIRONE. VICE CHAIRMAN MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT C. L. BOOKMAN CLOVER HILL DISTRICT J. RUFFIN APPERSON DALE DISTRICT GARLAND DODO BERMUDA DISTRICT M ADMINISTRATION C. G MANUEL INTERIM COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 April 26, 1977 Mr. J. Ruffin Apperson 7710 Beach Road Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Apperson: The Dale Ruritan Club received a permit for bingo and/or raffles from the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County on May 26, 1976. This permit for one (1) year will expire on May 26, 1977. If your organization wishes a renewal of this permit, please send a letter of intent and a check for $10.00 to the Office of the County Administrator. Should you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, e� 'a MaMX440 C. G. Manuel Interim County Administrator j sd M W JENNINGS, BEDDOW, MARLEY AND BURGESS ATTORNEYS AT LAW GRAHAM T. JENNINGS HOWARD S. MARLEY DEBORAH O. JENNINGS 7204 HULL STREET ROAD 360 WEST OFFICE BUILDING RICHMOND. VIRGINIA 23235 1- 804 - 276.8011 April 14, 1977 Steven L. Micas, Esquire Chesterfield County Attorney P. O. Box 40 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 CHARLES W. BEDDOW HAROLD W. BURGESS, JR. THOMAS L. MURPHEY FRED S. HUNT, III LAW BUILDING P. O. BOX 145 CHESTERFIELD COURTHOUSE VIRGINIA 23832 1 - 804 - 748-2277 Re: Shoosmith Bros., Inc, v. Quality Construction of Virginia, Inc. Dear Steve: Enclosed is a copy of the proposed Agreement with reference to the above styled matter. If this meets with your approval, I will forward you the triplicate originals to be executed by The County of Chesterfield, Virginia. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. TLM:psr Enclosure Very truly yours, Thomas L. Murphey RECEIVEF TNS c�,, o611 r �,."NEY a► iw 'TIiIS iCi13EEiVENT, rr)a.de and entered into this day of , 1177, by and between QUALI`I'Y C0N5'l.A1UC'TI0N OF V1Ii,t,1:NtA, INC., party u1' the fSrst part, SHOOSMITH BROS. , INC.'- , pat-ty of the second part, and THE COt N'Y' OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRCUMA, pa,ri,y of the third par -t, W I T N E S S I': T If That, WIIEREAS, the said parties have had Each with the other, V.uriou�, inarrcial. and business ti.-,insactions, and WLIERI--;.AS, the party of the third part has agreed to pay to the party of the part the sum of One 'Thousand One Hundred Fifty -Eight and 58/1.00 I)o1lai-i (�l, 158. 58) i.n cornplete satisfaction for all claims that the party of the t;,e.cond part may have against; the party of the first part and the party of the third part arising out of construction work done on airplane hangers at. the ("liesterfif,lcl C'c>rtnty Airportby the party of the second part., N(:: W, THEREFORE, each of said parties, the-ir'- 11e.ir Alccessoi s in into vsi and assigns, .in consideration of the agreement. herein made by the other, doth hF�rebv release and forever- discharge the other party from any and all claims and demands growing out of the construction of airplane hangers at the Chesterfield County Airport. Party of the second part hereby agrees to dismiss ar.i,v and all suits now pending ii -i any court against the party of the first part and party of the first: part hereby agrees to dismiss any and all suits riow pending in an,J court that it has against party of the third part.. I N WITNESS THEREOF, the parties aforesaid have executed tills agree - mens in triplicate originals, one of which is retained by each of the parties tie days and the year first above written. QUALITY CONST1113C .110N OF VIRGINIA, INC Eiy SHOOSMITH BROS. , INC. By VIRGINIA: At a regular meeting of the Chesterfield County School Board held Wednesday evening, April 13, 1977, at 8 o'clock, in the board room of the School Administration Building PRESENT: Dr. G. R. Partin, vice-chairman Mr. E. A. Moseley, Jr. Mr. A. Perry Strickland, III Mr. J. S. Harvie, III ABSENT: Mr. C. E. Curtis, Jr., chairman On motion of Mr. Harvie, seconded by Mr. Moseley, the school boa requested that the board of supervisors authorize the county treasurer to borrow a sum of money not to exceed $500, 000 pursuant to Section 15. 1-545 of the Code of Virginia for the purchase of textbooks and other instructional materials for the 1977-78 school year. Such loans or notes shall bear interest at a rate not exceeding six per centum per annum and shall be repaid within one year of their date. A copy: teste- Robert A. Lux, clerk M .......... n VIRGINIA° At a regular meeting of the Chesterfield County School Board held Wednesday evening, April 13, 1977, at 8 o'clock in the board room of the School Administration Building PRESENT: Dr. G. R. Partin, vice-chairman Mr. E. A. Moseley, Jr. Mr. J. S. Harvie, III Mr. A. Perry Strickland, III ABSENT: Mr. C. E. Curtis, Jr., chairman On motion of Mr. Moseley, seconded by Mr. Harvie, the school board directed that this resolution be forwarded to the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors requesting that the 21. 8 acres located on Krause Road, the site of the new vocational technical school, be conveyed to the school board in order that the school board might qualify for federal funding toward construction of this school. This parcel is a portion of approximately 100 acres donated to the school board by the county for placement of the vocational school, a senior high school, and the auxiliary transportation facility. A copy: teste- Robert A. Lux, Clerk ,%we 140 VIRGINIA: At a regular meeting of the Chesterfield County School Board held Wednesday evening, April 13, 1977, at 8 o'clock, in the board room of the School Administration Building PRESENT: Dr. G. R. Partin, vice•chai.rman Mr. E. A. Moseley, Jr. Mr. J. S. Harvie, III Mr. A. Perry Strickland, III ABSENT: Mr. C. E. Curtis, Jr., chairman On motion of Mr. Strickland, seconded by Mr. Moseley, the school board directed that the board of supervisors be respectfully requested to increase the Title IVC portion of the 1976-77 school budget by $27, 105. 00 for expenditures and revenue. These are additional monies that have been appropriated for this program. A copy: teste- Robert A. Lux, Clerk BOARD OF SUPERVISORS E MERLIN O NEILL CHAIRMAN MATOACA DISTRICT JOAN GIRONE VICE CHAIRMAN MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT C. L. BOOKMAN CLOVER HILL DISTRICT J. RUFFIN APPERSON DALE DItiTRICT GARLAND DODD BERMUDA DISTRICT OF SUPE �/ ,Gfs 40MINISTRATION C. G MANUEL INT FRIM COUNTY 4:)MINISTRAT(10 COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 MEMORANDUM April 26, 1977 TO: Member's of the Board of Supervisors FROM: C. L. Bookman, Chairman, Dog Committee SUBJECT: Dog Committee Recommendations to the Board of Supervisors Over the last several months, the Dog Committee has met three times to discuss at length changes in County ordinances and policies designed to clarify the control over the keeping of dogs in the County. The following recommendations for your review are attached: 1. Change in the definition of kennel to eliminate reference to cats and to increase the number of permissible dogs without kennel zoning from 2 to 4. 2. Change in the Zoning Ordinance to remove the limit on the number of dogs in the Agricultural Zone regardless of the size of the parcel; 3. Change in the Zoning Ordinance to remove the limit on the number of dogs in any parcel over 3 acres in size regardless of zone; 4. Change in the Zoning Ordinance to require a special exception issued by the Board of Zoning Appeals to keep 5 or more dogs in residential zones where the parcel is less than 3 acres. 5. Change in the Zoning Ordinance to require a special_ exception issued by the Board of Zoning Appeals to locate a kennel in business and industrial zones; 0e Members of the Board of Supervisors Page 2 April 26, 1977 6. Change in the County Code to raise the dog adoption fee from $6.00 to $10.00 and the boarding fee to $10.00 for the first day and $5.00 for each additional day thereafter; 7. Increase the individual dog license fee from $3.00 to $5.00 for males and females and re- duce the license fee for unsexed males and females from $9'.00 to $1.00. (After July 1, state law permits the County to increase the fee up to $10.00); 8. Reduce the number of days required to keep a dog at the pound from 10 to 7 days; (After July 1, state law permits the County to re- duce the number of days to 5); and, 9. Request that the County hire retired persons for 60 days to canvass areas to determine compliance with the dog tag law. The prohibition against running at large is retained in its present form. M 15 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND RFENACT SECTIONS 5-13 AND 5-17 OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1975, AS AMENDED RELATING GENERALLY TO DOG LICENSES AND CONFINEMENT AND DISPOSITION OF DOGS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chester- field County: (1) That sections 5-13 and 5-17 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield are amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 5-13. Required; term; taxes. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to own a dog six months old or over, unless such dog is licensed, as required by this section. (b) Dog licenses shall run by the calendar year from January 1 to December 31, inclusive, and the license tax shall be payable on or before February 1 of each license year at the office of the county treasurer and shall be as follows: (1) Male. For a male dog, three five dollars. (2) Unsexed Male or Female. For an unsexed male or female dog, three one dollars upon presentation of a veterinarian's certificate certifying that the dog is unsexed. (3) Female. For a female dog, three five dollars. (4) Kennel. For twenty dogs, fifteen dollars. (5) Kennel. For fifty dogs, twenty-five dollars. (c) Funds collected in the enforcement of this section shall be disposed of in the same manner as dog license taxes. Sec. 5-17. Confinement and disposition of dogs; redemption by owner; pound charges. (a) The dog warden shall cause to be constructed and maintained a pound or enclosure and shall require dogs run- ning at large contrary to the provisions of this article to, be confined therein. Any dog which has been confined for a period of ten seven days and has not been claimed by the owner thereof may be destroyed by the dog warden or other- wise disposed of in accordance with this section; provided, that dogs confined with tags shall not be destroyed until the owner of such dog has been notified in writing by certi- fied mail at least fifteen days prior to the destruction of the dog. Such notice requirement shall be deemed sufficient when mailed to the owner's address as it appears on record in the county treasurer's office. (b) Any dog found in the county not vaccinated or not wearing an authentic vaccination tag or license tag as pro- vided in this chapter shall be impounded by the dog warden, deputy dog wardens or police officers. (c) Any dog confined under any of the provisions of this chapter may be redeemed by its owner at any time after confinement, if such dog has not been otherwise disposed of under the provisions of this section, upon payment of the proper fees. No dog shall be released to any person claim- ing ownership until. proof of current dog license receipt or tag and current valid vaccination certificate are presented, and by payment to the dog warden of a fee in the amount of ene-ele}}ar-ar:d-f}ftp-eer�ts ten dollars if claimed during the first twenty-four hours of impoundment and fifty-eente-fer eael°r-ae�elitie�a}-e�ep-thereafter five dollars a day for each additional day thereafter. (d) Any person purchasing a dog from the county dog pound shall pay a fee of ten dollars; such money to be dis- posed of in the same manner as dog license taxes. Notwith- standing any other provisions of this section to the con- trary, the dog warden or his deputies may dispose of dogs confined at the county dog pound at any time after the con- finement period for such dog or dogs expires by selling such dog or dogs to bona fide medical research laboratories. The purchaser of such dogs shall certify to the dog warden on forms furnished by the county dog warden that the animals shall be used for medical research purposes only. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT SECTIONS 1-4, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 15-1, 16-1, 16-4, 17-1, 17-4, 18-4 AND 21-4 OF THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1975, AS AMENDED RELATING TO PERMISSIBLE ZONES FOR I:ENNELS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That sections 1-4, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 15-1, 16-1, 16-4, nce of 17-1, 1 f Chesterfield4 and 21-4 of the areZoning amendedrandareenactedeode as of the County o follows: Section 1-4 Definitions. .(47) KENNEL- A place where three five or more dogs of eats more than six months old are kept, either private or for pay or for sale. ARTICLE 4 R-40 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. The following regulations shall apply in all R-40 Dis- tricts: Section 4-1 Uses Permitted. (a) Single family dwellings. (b) Churches and other places of worship, including parish houses, Sunday Schools and temporary revival tents (revival tents subject to obtaining written permission from both the Police Department and Health Department). (c) Public schools, colleges, libraries and museums. (d) Publicly operated parks, p yg athletic fields, including buildings and facilities customarily appur- tenant thereto. Public and private forests, wildlife preserves and conservation areas. flowers, trees, (e) Propagation and cultivation of crops, and shrubs which are not offered for sale. (f) Kennels, provided that the lot or parcel has not less than three . (3) acres. Section 4-3 Uses allowed by Conditional Use subject to the provisions of Section 28-2 (a) Stock farms. .{b}--Kenne49- dwellings. (eb) Multiple -family dwel- (8c) A dwelling unit separated from the principal ling unit. (ed) Public and private profit making clubs, golf courses, and other recreational facilities. (fe) Planned Developments. (If) Mass Transportation. (hg) Two family dwellings. Section 4-4 Uses allowed by Special Exception, subject to the provisions of Section 27-5. (r) Y.ennels, where the lot or ( 3 ) acres. rcel is less than three ARTICLE 15 A AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT The following regulations shall apply in all A Districts: Section 15-1 Uses permitted. (a) Same as specified for R-40 District. (b) Farming, dairy farming, livestock and poultry rais- ing, including all buildings necessary to such use and the keeping, storage or operation of any vehicle or machinery necessary to such use. (c) Forestry operations and sawmills together with the incidental uses thereof. (d) Graveyards. (e) Stock Farms. (f) Kennels ;-pravieed-that-rs®t-mere-them-six- f 6i -degs are-Dept-a�tel-eestineel-to-tl�e-premises-e�rel-tke-let-ar-pareel leas-ret-cess-tY�art-Titre-{5}-aeres . ARTICLE 16 0 OFFICE BUSINESS DISTRICT Section 16-1. Uses Permitted. Within any O District,'no building, structures or pre- mises shall be used, arranged, or designed to be used in any part except for one or more of the following uses: (1) Any permitted use as regulated in the R-40 District, except dwellings and kennels. (2) Business, governmental, or professional office. (3) Libraries. (4) Medical clinics, but not hospitals. (5) Pharmacy and drug stores when located within the same building or structures housing medical office(s) or clinic(s). Section 16-4. Uses allowed by Special Exception, subject to the provisions of Section 27-5. (1) Same as Section 4-4(b). (2) Family day-care homes, child-care centers, and kindergartens. (3) Medical and dental laboratories. (4) Non-profit civic, social, and fraternal clubs, lodges, and recreational facilities. (5) Philanthropic and charitable institutions. (6) Private schools, colleges, and museums. (7) Kennels. ARTICLE 17 B-1 CONVENIENCE BUSINESS DISTRICT Section 17-1 Uses permitted. (1) Any permitted use as regulated in the R-40 District except dwellings or kennels; provided, however, that any dwellings legally existing in this District at the time of adoption of the Ordinance of any amendment hereto shall not be subject to the restrictions or non -conforming uses con- tained herein. 01 IPJ Section 17-4 Uses allowed by Special Exception, subject to the provisions of Section 27-5. (1) Any special exception allowed in the R-40 District, unless previously allowed in Section 17-1. (2) Kennels. Section 18-4 Uses allowed by Special Exception, subject to the provisions of Section 27-5. (10) Kennels. Section 21-4 Uses allowed by Special Exception, subject to the provisions of Section 27-5. (1) Any special exception allowed in the B-3 District. (2) Outdoor advertising signs. (3) Kennels. V - ANIMAL CONTROL DEPARTMENT CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY CLAIM INVESTIGATION REPORT Date 4-4-77 I, Warden E. B. Blalock on this date investigated the claim of Mr. George W. Houston Address 3828 Baldwin Rd. - s. i2 Do [I1 ml for 9 Bannon Chickens 1 yr. old 2 Lbs. NDescription 111 age, weight 3 °' Silver Pheasants 2&3 Yrs. 5# which occured on April 3 1977 in Chesterfield County. I estimate value of fannons- 2.00 each, total value$ 69,00 Silver Phe4s4nt -5.00 Authority Mr. Balendar- Virginia tate Department of Agriculture I (d`i'd', did not) witness the actual (killing and/ar-ma7i-ft%g) of the animals claimed. The guilty (dog, dugs) ohave, have not) been (caught, -I41 -ed) and are described as follows: did not see the dog. Damage was done in the following manner: He broke into the pen and killed the birds, and ate parts of them. As a result of maining, 0 of the total claimed above were destroyed by the owner, or by me at the owner's request. Following are witness: I have investigated this claim as thoroughly as possible. I (have, 4ave-Ret) viewed the remains of the animals claimed. I (have, iia-ve-+aat) viewed the area where said animals were attacked along with other physical evidence and I (have, havLs-not) questioned available witnesses. Respectfully, e 6 &- el- E.B. Blalock ANIMAL CONTROL DEPARTMENT CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY CLAIM INVESTIGATION REPORT Date April 26, 1977 I, Warden C.E. Winn on this date investigated the claim of Mr. H.E. Ward Chesterfield, VA 23832 Address 5841 Woodpecker for 17 Chicken, red and white, 6 weeks old, 12 lbs. No. Description kind, age, weight which occured on April 19 1977 in Chesterfield County. I estimate value of $� $1.00 per chicken each, total value$ 17.00 Authority Mr. Salender State A r. Assoc. I (akicak, did not) witness the actual (killing RW6tRORWRS) of the animals claimed. The guilty (ft, dogs) (karya, have not) been (caught, kWRO) and are described as follows: One large red dogi. mixed; One large black mixed• two brown u ies Damage was done in the following manner: Dogs went into the shed and killed 17 chickens. As a result of maining, 0 of the total claimed above were destroyed by the owner, or by me at the ow a 's request. Following are witness: I have investigated this claim as thoroughly as possible. I (have, c) viewed the remains of the animals claimed. I (have, kjjXR00) viewed the area where said animals were attacked along with other physical evidence and I (have, ixaxrxat) questioned available witnesses. Mr. H.E. Ward Mark Ward Respectfully, *Sr✓ *400 COUNTY OF Cf IESTERI! IELD VIRGINIA Details of Investments At June 3U, 75 Number Yield or of Interest Maturity Description Shares Rate Value Date GENERAL FUND: Repurchase Agreements:* Central National Bank . . . Central National Bank . Central National Bank Real Estate: Purchased from: U.B.Puckett--60 acres . . . . H.C.Wilkinson--83 acres . . . W.D.Goode--5.7 acres . . . . . C.E.Curtis, et a1--31.25 acres R.E.Mann--2 acres . . . . R.B.Belcher--75 acres Total General Fund . . . . . • • WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION FUND: $ 500 000 7- 2-75 1 000 000 7- 3-75 1 200 000 7- 3-75 Bonds : 3.000% $ County of Chesterfield . • • ' 3,100% County of Chesterfield . . . Mortgage Note: 5.000% J• C. Gunn and wife 6.000% J. H. Johnson, III and wife 5.000% C. E. Richter and wife 7.250% Sctieclule A-3 Amount (At Cost or Uncollected Balance) $ 500 000 00 1 000 000 00 1 200 000 00 2 250 00 1 800 00 300 00 2 000 00 125 00 2 000 00 $2 708 475 00 5 000 12- 1-80 $ 3 132 05 5 000 3- 1-82 3 043 55 Clyde W. Ward and wi fe . . Total Workmen's Compensation Fund . . . . . . . • • • • ' ' WATER OPERATING FUND: Bonds: 3.000% $ 5 000 County of Chesterfield . • • • 3.100% 15 000 County of Chesterfield . . . . 25 12- 1-98 Total Water Operating Fund . . . . • • • • • • ' ' ' IMPROVEMENT REPLACEMENT & EXTENSION FUND --SEWER: Repurchase Agreement:* $1 000 000 Central National Bank . UTILITY WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION FUND: Bonds: 3.000% $ 5 000 County of Chesterfield . • • • 3,100% 5 000 County of Chesterfield . . . Total Utility Workmen's Compensation Fund . . . . . . UTILITY LIABILITY INSURANCE RESERVE FUND: Bonds: County of Chesterfield . . . . 3.000% $ 3. 100% 10 5 000 000 County of Chesterfield . . . . 4.375% 20 000 American TeleptioneRrTelegraph Co. 7.500, 10 000 Appalachin Power Co. Maryland. 7.250% 5 000 C &P Telephone Co. of 4 145 49 11 319 90 1 136 39 7 743 25 $ 30 520 63 12- 1-80 $ 3 132 05 3- 1-82 9 130 65 $12 262 70 $1 000 000 00 12- 1-80 $ 3 132 05 3- 1-82 3 043 55 $ 6 175 60 12- 1-80 $ 6 264 10 3- 1-82 3 043 55 5- 1-99 11 350 00 12- 1-98 8 475 00 2- 1-12 4 225 00 J COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA Details of Investments ;At June 30, 1975 (Continued) Number Yield or of Interest Maturity Description Shares Rate Value Date ,UTILITY LIABILITY INSURANCE RESERVE FUND: Bonds: (Continued) 5 General Motors Acceptance Corp. 12- ? Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.. 4 Liggett & Meyers Tobacco Co. . 00 Levis ville & Nashville R.R. Co., 20 Norton Simon, Inc, . . . . . . 7- Pittsburg Plate Glass Co. . . . 12 Reynolds Tobacco Co. . . . . . 00 Sante Fe Industries . . . . . . 20 Seaboard Coastline R.R. Co, . . 5- Standard Oil of Indiana . . . . 13 Tenneco. . . . . . . . . . . . 00 Tri -South Mortgage Investors 20 United Virginia Bankshares 12- Virginia Commonwealth Bankshares 15 Preferred Stock: 00 Appalachin Power Cc. . . . . . 280 Carolina Power & Light Co. . . 50 Consolidated Edison . . . . . . 200 General Motors Acceptance Corp, 300 Gulf States Utilities Corp. . . 2.00 Jersey Central Power & Light Co, 300 Niagara Mohawk Power Co. . . . 2.00 South Carolina Electric & Gas Co, 300 Southern Railway Co. . . . . . 1,200 Union Oil of California . . . . 100 Virginia Electric & Power Co. 300 Common Stock: 00 Adams Express Co. . . , . . . . 260 American General Bond . , . . 250 Bethlehem Steel Co. . . . . . . 100 Drexel Bond Debenture Trading Fund 300 El Paso Natural Gas Co. . . . . 300 -Madison Fund . . . . . . . . . 300 Massachusetts Mutual Income 4 Investors, Inc. . . . . . . . 200 Northwestern Pipeline Corp. . . 30 One William Street Fund . . . . 103 Phillip Morris . . . . . . . . 2.00 Tenneco . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 Union Bag -Camp Corp. . . . . . 2.00 U.S. & Foreign Securities . . . 100 Wheeling & Lake Erie R.R. . . . 50 (Continued) Schedule A-3 Page 2 Amount (At Cost or Uncollected Balance) 7.125% $ 5 000 12- 1-90 $ 4 250 00 6.000% 20 000 7- 1-87 12 600 00 6.000% 20 000 5- 1-92 13 625 00 7.375% 20 000 12- 1-93 15 700 00 6.000% 30 000 7- 1-98 19 500 00 5.625% 8 000 8- 1-91 5 940 00 8.125% 3 000 9- 1-74 2 985 00 6.250% 10 000 8- 1-98 8 900 00 8.350% 5 000 3-15-96 4 500 00 6.000% 10 000 9-15-91 7 675 00 7.000% 10 000 10- 1-93 7 412 00 7.775% 10 000 2-15-80 8 437 00 7.775% 10 000 1997 9 287 00 7.250% 5 000 5- 1-80 4 175 00 12 600 00 4 000 00 7 000 00 14 250 00 10 800 00 10 350 00 10 100 00 7 800 00 7 350 00 4 700 00 15 150 00 2 632 00 5 562 00 2 950 00 3 975 00 3 037 00 2 287 00 2 000 00 363 00 1 243 00 9 82.5 00 3 92.5 00 11 750 00 1 512 00 3 175 00 Total Utility Liability Insurance Reserve Fund . . . . . . . . $ 316 679 65 Grand Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $4 074 113 58 *Investments in U. S. Government securities with a stipulation that the securities be returned to the seller, who is a securities broker, on a specified date for a mutually agreed upon interest rate, M E5 ��of , THIS AGREEMENT, made this A da �[_Y -- 1971, by and between THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA ("Home") and ARA HOSPITAL FOOD MANAGEMENT, INC., a Delaware corporation (a wholly-owned subsidiary of ARA SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation) having its principal place of business at Independence Square, West, 6th and Walnut Streets, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ("ARA"), WITNESSETH that: 1. AUTHORIZATION: Home hereby authorizes ARA to provide counseling on the preparation and service of food, including therapeutic diets, for patients, staff, employees and authorized visitors at the Chesterfield County Nursing Home premises located in Chesterfield, Virginia. 2. ARA AGREES: A. FOOD SERVICE: To provide counseling on the furnishing of food and food products, including therapeutic diets for Home's patients, staff, employees and authorized visitors. Hours and types of service shall be determined by Home. B. MENUS: To submit menus at least one (1) week in , advance of service for approval to such person as Home designates. All menus will be nutritionally adequate. C. PERSONNEL: To provide from its home office expert administrative, dietetic, purchasing, and personnel advice. All Dietary Department personnel, except ARA's food service director and consulting dietician, will be on Home's payroll and will be paid by Home. �kwe 11"0 All personnel and payroll costs (including wages, salaries, payroll taxes, reasonable travel expenses, and fringe benefits) of ARA's food service director and consulting dietician shall be included as direct costs of operation in accordance with Paragraph 3 hereof. Fringe benefits shall mean benefits customarily made available by ARA to employees of comparable positions, and shall include but not be limited to health and welfare, insurance, pension and profit sharing benefits, educational assistance, paid time off accrual and training accrual. ARA agrees that no supervisory employees of Home will be hired by ARA without specific written permission of Home for the period of this Agreement and six (6) months thereafter. Home agrees that without specific written permission of ARA, former supervisory employees of ARA. will. neither be hired by Home for the period of this Agreement and six (6) months thereafter, nor will Home permit former supervisory employees of ARA to be employed in Home's facilities for a period of six (6) months subsequent to the termination of this Agreement (unless such employees were formerly employees of Home). For the purpose of this prohibition, "former supervisory employees" shall mean those persons who have directly or indirectly performed services for Home's facilities for at least six (6) months and who performed any portion of such services during the six (_6) month period immediately prior to the termination of this Agreement. -2- M n D. PURCHASING: To advise and assist Home in the purchasing of all food and supplies utilized in the Dietary Department. Such food and food supplies shall be purchased through the Chesterfield County Purchasing Department,, in cooperation with the Director of General Services and shall be kept separate and apart and title thereto shall remain in Home at all times. Home'will process and pay all invoices for such food and supplies. E. INSURANCE: To furnish Home with a certificate of insurance in form acceptable to Home, certifying that ARA carries workmen's compensation and comprehensive general liability insurance (including products) in such amounts as are acceptable to Home, insuring against any claims arising out of ARA's consulting services hereunder. The cost of such insurance shall be a direct cost of operation. Home and ARA hereby waive any and all right of recovery from each other for loss to personal or real property, or loss of use thereof, howsoever occurring. This waiver shall include but not be limited to losses covered by policies of fire, extended coverage, boiler explosion and sprinkler leakage. F. EQUIPMENT: To call to Home's attention any equipment which is in need of repair or replacement and to offer procedures to insure that Home's Dietary Depart- ment personnel exercise due care in the use of such equipment. Additionally, ARA will assist Home in the selection of equipment for the Dietary Department. Such equipment shall be ordered and paid for by Home. -3- G. PATIEV,,,e RELATIONS: To recommend,Iograms for the conduct of a patient visitation and dietary instruction program. H. LICENSES, PERMITS AND TAXES: To assist Home in the securing of Federal, State and local licenses, and permits required for operation of the Dietary Department. Home will pay for all such licenses and permits, and will pay all sales, excise and State and local income taxes attributable to the Dietary Department. I. DIRECT COSTS OF OPERATION: To pay, on behalf of Home,for such incidental costs of operation, in addition to those set forth in this Paragraph 2, as are incurred by ARA in conducting its consulting services pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. FISCAL ARRANGEMENTS: Home will pay for all costs sustained in the operation of the Dietary Department and will reimburse ARA each accounting period for any direct costs incurred by ARA in its consulting operations. Such costs shall include by way of example and not enumeration the salaries of ARA's food service director and consulting dietician in the amount estimated at $20,145. per year, and any and all fringe benefits, insurance and other incidental costs paid by ARA on behalf of Home. in addition, ARA shall receive an allowance for its general administrative costs of One Hundred Dollars ($100.) per week, plus a management fee of Twelve and one-half cents (12.50) per patient day (hereinafter collectively referred to as ARA's "consulting fee"); provided however, that in no event shall ARA's consulting fee be less than Two Hundred Dollars ($200.) per week. Home hereby guarantees payment of such costs and consulting fee to ARA. -4- For Home's accounting purposes only, patient meal count shall be determined by multiplying the midnight patient census by 2.95 meals per patient day. 4. ACCOUNTING: The accounting periods in each year shall consist of the twelve calendar months. Within thirty (30) days after the end of each accounting period, including the first accounting period, ARA will submit to Home a statement for the actual direct costs incurred during the period, together with the consulting fee payable to ARA as provided for herein, which statement Home will pay within ten (10) days of the invoice date. 5. ACCESS AND RECORDS: It is understood that ARA's full and accurate accounts and records of its direct costs may be audited at any time within two (2) years after the period to which they pertain. 6. CONFIDENTIALITY: All financial, statistical, operating and personnel data, including but not necessarily limited to recipes, menus and meal plans, relative to or utilized in ARA's business or the business of any other subsidiary of ARA SERVICES, INC., shall be the property of ARA and shall be confidential. Home agrees to keep such information confidential and so instruct its agents, servants, employees and independent contractors. The use of such data by Home in any manner, including but not limited to the use in any computer program, shall not destroy ARA's ownership or its confidentiality. ARA shall submit to Home necessary data, as requested by Home,for its reporting require- ments, which data may be reasonably utilized by Home in satisfaction of such reporting requirements. -5- n U 7. TERMINATION: This Agreement may, at any time more than ninety (90) days from the date that ARA shall begin to provide consulting services, be terminated by either party by giving the other not less than sixty (60) days' written notice of intention to terminate as of the date specified. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be signed by their duly authorized representatives the day and year first above written. Attest: INT RIMICOUNTY ADMINISTR OR CMINTTY !Ij IC, W.; Fy CMH 4/6/77 COUNTY -OF CHESTERFIELD, CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA ("Home") ARA HOSPITAL FOOD MANAGEMENT, INC. ("ARA11) Fred B. Fishman Authorized Representative. n 4 MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS 1eV B. C. /I. In Request of W. Courtney Wells Request of the Real Estate Assessor Livestock & Poultry Claim Contract - Nursing Home/ARA County Investments Personnel & Salary Committee Summer Basketball - Clover Hill H.S. according to Carl Wise, gym is air- conditioned Account Codes - Airport Industrial Park Both Revenue & Expenditures have been set up Resolution - Student Government M The Board of Supervisors Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Gentlemen: 21 April 1977 Request is hereby made for permission to utilize Chesterfield County property shown on attached plat for additional parking for office building under construction between Health Department Building and School Board Administration Building. Construction of this additional parking will be entirely at owners expense. It is felt that this additional parking may serve the Chesterfield School Board Building as well as relieve severe parking problems encountered at times around the Courthouse. Sincer 1 yours W. Courtney We s, Partner Rudyl Daffron & Wells cc 1 Vol 21 Apra 1977 Tisa board of S,*-vr -----4wtL*U,t virsw 2 �-. atiray at IIS BOO it to rat tmt tug A *Wd bo Uft as WO1 ai l"* S prebia�ls +1r�d at Uaft d OW 00 ri► vo o q► Yet ftruw err bait & 11OUS M �j Oslo f ck Ul V, n BOARD OF SUPERVISORS E. MERLIN O NEILL CHAIRMAN MATOACA DISTRICT JOAN GIRONE. VICE CHAIRMAN MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT C. L. BOOKMAN CLOVER HILL DISTkICT J. RUFFIN APPERSON DALE DISTRICT LEO MYERS BERMUDA DISTRICT *490 8, ADMINISTRATION M. W. BURNETT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR C G.MANUEL ASST. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR LEE O FALWELL ASST. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR C O U NTY OF C H E S T E R F I ELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 April 21, 1977 Mr. C. G. Manuel Acting County Administrator Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Va. 23832 Ref: Use of County Vehicles Dear Mr. Manuel: Responding to your inquiry, the Assessor's Office employs the following Appraisers who live outside the County boundaries: Mr. Hubert Shropshire, Henrico County, Mr. Richard Musselman, City of Richmond and Mr. Raymond Cash who was annexed. They are all aware of the County policy of vehicle use. Because of their importance to this office, I request an exception be made to this policy until they can relocate in the County. Mr. Shropshire is currently trying to sell his property to effect this move. Very truly yours, r _tai JtJ J es C. Falconer, Sr. eal Estate Assessor JCF/fc April 25, 1977 1' r Mrs. Joan Girone Board of Supervisors Chestetfield County Chesterfield, VA. Dear Mrs. Girone: As you know the Chesterfield County Volunteers were one of the original agencies to accept the grant of a van through this Agency's umbrella grant application for funds from the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA) for 14 vans for elderly and handicapped transpor- tation. Chesterfield County was one of the jurisdictions of the Planning District to provide matching funds (20% required) to the UMTA funds. Your County provided $3,600. The wheelchair lift vans, which the Volunteers requested, finally arrived on March 25, 1977, more than two years after our application. The Chesterfield County Volunteers notified me on or about March 22, 1977, that their Board of Directors had decided not to accept the van for various reasons. Prime among those reasons was doubt concerning their ability to continue support of the van in future years. The van has been stored in the Department of Highways & Transpor- tation (DH&T) lot on Midlothian Pike since receipt on March 25, 1977. Pressure is on our Agency from DH&T to put the vehicle in operation or turn it back to them for use some place else in Virginia. We are most anxious to keep the van for use in Chesterfield County and have been looking for an agency to accept it. The UMTA regulations require the van to go to a private, non-profit agency. SPECTRAN, a part of CORDET Foundation, a recipient of six vans through the same grant, has been approached to accept this van and operate it in Chesterfield County. They cannot afford to operate without some subsidies and without some assurance of known transportation business. The Rev. Anderson Sale, Board member of Chesterfield County Volunteers, has agreed to ask his Board for $3,000 they had set aside for operation of the van, part of which was a grant from CIDANJO, a private foundation here in Richmond. We are asking Chesterfield County to assist in operating funds by providing $1,000 to CAAA. We.will turn the funds over to SPECTRAN or whatever agency is able to accept the van for use in Chesterfield County. E5 Mrs. Girone -- 2 April 25f 1977 We are in need of transportation for our Nutrition Site in Midlothian for which we will subcontract with SPECTRAN. Dr. Wagner from your Health Department has just recently talked to me concerning his transportation needs also and I referred him to SPECTRAN. So there appears to be much need in the County. We hope that the Board of Supervisors will favorably consider this request. I would be willing to answer any questions or be at a Board meeting if desired. Sincerely, Louis S. Barretta Executive Director LSB/jrb 411111iiile 14 Ctv of Colonial Prights COLONIAL HEIGHTS. VIRGINIA 23834 April 18, 1977 The Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board of Supervisors Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Gentlemen: On May 7th and 8th, the Colonial Heights Bicentennial Commission is holding the Fort Clifton Arts -Music -Crafts Festival at the area located on Conduit Road near Tussing Elementary School. We would appreciate your attendance as our City's friends. The event will be a weekend of family enjoyment in a setting filled with history and beauty. We will have artists creating and exhibiting their paintings, crafts- men performing their skills, musicians expressing themselves in song, and Civil War buffs showing their relics. In addition, Brunswick stew and other tasty foods will be served on the festival site. We will be open from 11: 00 A. M. to 8: 00 P. M. on May 7th and 1: 00 to 7: 00 P. M. on May 8th. We look forward to seeing you on these dates. Sincerely, John E. Brockwell, Jr . , Chairman Colonial Heights Bicentennial Commission April 6, 1977 MEMORANDUM TO: Richmond News Leader FROM: Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors SUBJECT: Meetings Coming Events One (1) time, Wednesday, April 13, 1977 One (1) time, Wednesday, April 20, 1977 Please confirm by calling the County Administrator's Office at 748-1211. j sd Attachment C. G. Manuel Interim County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORSi/l 4DMINISTRATION E. MERLIN O'NEILL. CHAIRMAN 4 , C. G MANUEL MATOACA DISTRICT O� INTERIM COUNTY A'JMINISTRATOR JOAN GIRONE. VICE CHAIRMAN O(7► MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT C. L. BOOKMAN CLOVER HILL DISTRICT J. RUFFIN APPERSON l • /� _- / DALE DISTRICT __ GARLAND DODO BERMUDA DISTRICT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 April 6, 1977 MEMORANDUM TO: Richmond News Leader FROM: Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors SUBJECT: Meetings Coming Events One (1) time, Wednesday, April 13, 1977 One (1) time, Wednesday, April 20, 1977 Please confirm by calling the County Administrator's Office at 748-1211. j sd Attachment C. G. Manuel Interim County Administrator a M BOARD OF SUPERVISORS E. MERLIN O NEILL. CHAIRMAN MATOACA DISTRICT JOAN GIRONE. VICE CHAIRMAN MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT C. L. BOOKMAN CLOVER HILL DISTRICT J. RUFFIN APPERSON DALE DISTRICT GARLAND DODO BERMUDA DISTRICT In ADMINISTRATION C.G MANUEL INTERIM COUNTY AOMINISTRATOR COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 April 6, 1977 MEMORANDUM TO: Progress Index FROM: Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors SUBJECT: Meetings Coming Events One (1) time, Wednesday, April 13, 1977 One (1) time, Wednesday, April 20, 1977 Please confirm by calling the County Administrator's Office at 748-1211. Also, please send us a copy of the advertise- ment after it has been published.. jsd Attachment C. G. Manue Interim County Administrator 1�r+ A K E N O T I C E That the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, on Wednesday, April 27, 1977, beginning at 2:30 p.m., in the County Board Room at Chesterfield Courthouse, Virginia, will take under considersation the rezoning and the granting of Conditional Uses on the parcels of land described herein. 765222 In Midlothian Mag Dist 1314 W. MAIN PENSION PLAN requests rezoning from Agri (A) to Off Bus (0) of 9.39 acre par fronting on Courthouse Rd, on Branchway Rd located N of intersection of these roads. T M 17-13 (1) 1-1. 77S035 In Clover Hill Mag Dist CREATIVE DISPLAYS, INC. requests amendment to Cond Use (Case No. 735013) for Planned Development to permit outside storage in Light Ind (M-1) Dist on 2 acre par fronting on Southlake Blvd, located S of intersection with Mid Turnpike. T M 17-10 (1) 4-2. 77S039 In Clover Hill Mag Dist, SIMMONS REALTY, INC. request rezoning from Agri (A) to Res (R-7) of 140 acre par fronting on Belmont Rd located opposite the Land -O -Pines Subdivision (Sanchez Rd). T M 65-1 (1) 1 and 4. 77SO40 In Bermuda Mag Dist LaVERNE C. COLE et. al. request rezoning from Agri (A) to Res (R-7)of 4.03 acre par being the northern 250 feet of Lots 9 through 14, Blk A, Sec A of Buxton as resubdivided. Buxton, Sec A, Blk A, Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14. 77SO41 In Midlothian Mag Dist, EDWARD J. WILLIS, JR. AND DAVID L. McKINNEY request rezoning from Agri (A) to Res (R-7) of 5.06 acre par fronting on Robious Rd located NW of intersection with Wrens Nest Rd. T M 17-2 (1) 2-1, 2-3, 2-4 and 9 77SO42 In Dale Mag Dist, ZANE G. from Res (R-15) to Off Bus (0) of Rd located S of intersection with and 5 and 95-7 (1) 1. DAVIS AND HENRY MYERS request rezoning 7.2 acre par fronting on Iron Bridge Deerfield Dr. T M 95-3 (2) 2, 3, 4 77SO43 In Bermuda Mag Dist, A. TREDWAY LAYNE requests rezoning from Res (R-7) to Off Bus (0) of 0.72 acre par fronting on W Hundred Rd located NE of intersection with Ecoff Av. Snead -Curtis Lots 15A and 16. 77SO44 In Midlothian Mag Dist, M. SHEVEL AND JEAN F. SIFF request re- zoning from Conv Bus (B-1) to Gen Bus (B-3) of 1.27 acre par fronting on Mid Turnpike located opposite of intersection with Ruthers Rd. T M 18-16 (1) 33 and 33-2. 77SO45 In Matoaca Mag Dist, CLARENCE G. CONNER requests rezoning from Comm Bus (B-2) to Gen Bus (B-3) of 1.76 acre par fronting on Jefferson Davis Highway, fronting on Milhorn Street, located in NW quadrant of intersection of these rds. Midhorn Tract Blk E, Lots 1, 2, and 3. n M 77SO46 In Dale Mag Dist, JOHN E. DODSON request rezoning from Agri (A) to Res (R-7) of 86 acre par fronting on Beulah Rd located N of intersection with Salem Church Rd. T M 66-11 (1) 1. 77SO48 In Midlothian Mag Dist, JULIAN C. METTS requests a Cond Use to permit construction of Prof Off Building in Agri (A) Dist on 0.66 acre par fronting on Forest Hill Ave located W of Chesterfield County/City of Richmond line. Stratford Hills, Sec T, Blk A, Lot 1. 77SO50 In Clover Hill Mag Dist, E. M. CIEJEK, INC. requests rezoning from Comm Bus (B-2) to Gen Bus (B-3) of 2.6 acre par fronting on Mid Turnpike, fronting on Research Rd located in SE quadrant of intersection of these roads. 60 W Comm Plaza; Sec B, Blk F, Lot 16. Copies of these amendments are on file in the Department of Community Development, Room 307, Office Building, Chesterfield Courthouse, Chester- field, Virginia, for public examination between the hours of 8:30 A. M. 5:00 P. M. of each regular business day. I^ RICHMOND NEVI SPAPERS, INC. Publisher of THE RICHMOND NEWS LEADER Richmond, Va........ ..,APR 2 0 1977 LEGAL NOTICE This is to certify that the attached. was published in The Richmond News Leader a .................... . lished in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia.newspaper pub - APR 1 3 i ....................... ............................... APR ....... 2 0 1977 ..................................... The first insertion beinggiven ................ APR 1 3 1977 worn to an """""" ............................. sc gg me this ... ... . . ...... . ............... N ary Pub ' CORNL State of Virginia, City of Richmond: ELMARTI LVy commission expires 12126180 SU -PER VISOR ACCTS. NEC. TITLE AND DAVID regtmt rezoning from Agri (A) to Res (R-7) of 3:06 acrd par fronting on Robious fad. located` NW of intersection with Weans Nest Rd. T KIM (1) 2-1,1.3, 2-9 ,and 9. T A K E N O T I C E That the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, on Wednesday, April 27, 1977, beginning at 2:30 P. M., in the County Board Room at Chesterfield Courthouse, Virginia, will take under consideration the rezoning and the granting of Conditional Uses on the parcels of land described herein at the times indicated. 2:30 ,/76S222 In Midlothian Magisterial District, the 1314 W. MAIN PENSION PLAN requests rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Office Business (0) of a 9.39 acre parcel fronting 1752.63 feet on Courthouse Road, 899.76 feet on Branchway Road, located approximately 800 feet north of the inter- section of these roads. Tax Map 17-13 (1) Parcel 1-1 (Sheet 8). 2:35 01 V 77SO35 In Clover Hill Magisterial District, CREATIVE DISPLAYS, INC. requests amendment to a Conditional Use (Case Number 73SO13) for a Planned Development to permit outside storage in a Light Industrial (M-1) District on a 2 acre parcel,,fronting 260 feet on Southlake Boulevard, located approximately 1600 feet south of its intersection with Midlothian Turnpike. Tax Map 17-10 (1) Parcel 4-2 (Sheet 8). 2:40 V77SO39 In Clover Hill Magisterial District, SIMMONS REALTY, INC. requests rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7) of a 140 acre parcel, fronting 1890.89 feet on Belmont Road and located opposite the Land -O -Pines Subdivision (Sanchez Road). Tax Map 65-1 (1) Parcel 1 and 4 (Sheet 21/22). ✓77540 In Bermuda Magisterial District LaVERNE C. COLE et. al. request rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7) of a 4.03 acre parcel. being the northern 250 feet of Lots 9, through 14, Block A, Section A of Buxton as resubdivided. Resubdivision of Tax Map 114-7 (3) Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14; Buxton, Sec A, Blk A, Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14. 2:50 77SO41 In Midlothian Magisterial District, EDWARD J. WILLIS, JR. AND DAVID L. McKINNEY request 'rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7) if a 5.06 acre parcel -fronting approximately 340 feet on Robious Road and located approximately 120 -feet northwest of its intersection with Wrens Nest Road. Tax Map 17-2 (1) Parcels 2-1, 2-3, 2-4 and 9 (Sheet 8). 2:55 77SO42 In Dale Magisterial District, ZANE G. DAVIS AND HENRY MYERS request rezoning from Residential (R-15) to Office Business (0) of a 7.2 acre parcel fronting 998.70 feet on Iron Bridge Road and located approximately 100 feet south of its intersection with Deerfield Drive. Tax Map 95-3 (2) 3 Lots 2, 3, 4 and 5 and 95-7 (1) Lot 1 (Sheet 31). �/ N843 In Bermuda Magisterial District, A. TREDWAY LAYNE requests rezoning from Residential (R-7) to Office Business (0) of a 0.72 acre parcel fronting approximately 80 feet on West Hundred Road and 'located approximately 300 feet northeast of its intersection with Ecoff Avenue. Tax Map 115-10 (2) Lots 15A and 16; Snead -Curtis Lots 15A and 16 (Sheet 32). 3:05 77SO44 In Midlothian Magisterial District, M. SHEVEL AND JEAN F. SIFF re- quest rezoning from Convenience Business (B-1) to General Business (B-3) of a 1.27 acre parcel.fronting approximately 190 feet on Midlothian Turnpike and being located opposite of its intersection with Ruthers Road. Tax Map 18-16 (1) Lots 33 and 33-2 (Sheet 8). 3: 10 4/77SO45 In Matoaca Magisterial District, CLARENCE G. CONNER requests rezoning from Community Business (B-2) to General Business (B-3) of a 1.76 acre parcel fronting approximately 340 feet on Jefferson Davis Highway, also fronting approximately 240 feet on Milhorn Street, and located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of these roads. Tax Map 149-11 (2) Lots 1, 2 and 3 Milhorn Tract Blk E, Lots 1, 2, and 3 (Sheet 41). V N846 In Dale Magisterial District, JOHN E. DODSON request rezonin from Agricultural (A) to Residential R-7) of a 86 acre g approximately 1670 feet on Beulah Roa an located approximately 230ing feet north of its intersection with Salem Church Road. Tax Map 66-11 (1) Parcel 1 (Sheet 22). 35048 In Midlothian Magisterial District JULIAN C. METTS requests a Conditional Use to permit the construction of a Professional Office Building in an Agricultural (A) District on a 0.66 acre parcel approximately 240 feet on Forest Hill Avenue and locatedapproximately fronting 100 feet west of the Chesterfield County/City of Richmond line.Tax Map 10-7 (5) Lot l; Stratford Hills, Section T, Blk A, Lot 1 (Sheet 3). �725 .7SO50_ In Clover Hill Magisterial District, E. M. CIEJEK, INC. requests zoning from Community Business (B-2) to General Business (B-3) ofua 2.6 acre parcel fronting 274.31 feet on Midlothian Turnpike, also fronting 371.95 feet on Research Road 'and located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of these roads. Tax Map 17-9 (3) Lot 16; 60 West Commercial Plaza; Sec B, Blk F, Lot 16 (Sheet 8) .�R�,.,. Copies of these amendments are on file in the Department of Community Development, Room 307, Office Building, Chesterfield Courthouse, Chester- field, Virginia, for public examination between the hours of 8`,:30 A. M. and 5:00 P. M. of each regular. business day. APPLICANT AND/OR AGENT MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARING. All persons favoring or opposing the granting of the above request: invited to appear at the time and place herein stated. `e Stanl y Balderson, Jr. Principal Planner fru )F CASE NUMBER: 76S222 APPLICANT: THE 1314 WEST MAIN PENSION PLAN REQ17EFT AND PROPOSED USE: It iq the intent that office buildings be constructed on the parcel in question. To these ends, a preliminary site plan and renderings have been presented with the application. These plans depict the proposed layout and show the architectural style of the structures to be erected on tre parcel. GENERAL LOCATION TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Midlothian Magisterial District, this parcel is part of the triangular section of land lying between newly aligned Courthouse Road and Branchway Road. (Old Courthouse Road). The subject parcel lies in close proximity to the entrance of Stonehenge Subdivision (Edenberry Drive). Tax Map Sec. 17-13 (1), Parcel 1-1 (Sheet 8). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE, SUBJECT PARCEL: The parcel in question contains 4.154 acres, is presently zoned Agricultural (A) and remains vacant and partially wooded. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: All adjacent property is zoned Agricultural (A). This property remains either vacant and wooded or has been developed for single family residential use. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION REQUIRED OFF' -SITE EASEMEN^ Public water and sewer are available to the site and would be require in proposed development. Public sewer is located along Falling Creek and it is indicated that the use of sewer is probably not feasible. Soils on this property are well drained and good for foundations and roadways; however, it should be noted that excessive amounts of gravel may cause difficulty in landscaping. The parcel drains tew�Rrds Falling Creek and standard erosion control requirements are anticipated. An off-site sewer easement would be required and there. is the possiblity that an off-site drainage easement would also be necessary. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Development for the proposed use should have no detrimental impact on either existing or future area public faciliti TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: In prior discussions with the representativ of the Applicant, it was pointed out that the proposed use might be restricted when taking into consideration the necessary building and parking setbacks along Branchway. and Courthouse Roads. It has been noted that proper access to the parcel would be of prime concern GENERAL PLAN: Residential development'of the area encompassing the -request parcel. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant is seeking rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Office Business (0) of the subject parcel. It is intended that office buildings be constructed on the site. On November 26, 1975, the Board of Supervisors denied a request for a Conditional Use which would have permitted the construction and 1. (over) arid, --operation )-office buildings and as -so ted facilities Aome5 what to the south of :he parcel. The p�'anning Commission on Zuly :15, 1975, recommended denial of the request. The current application seeks to rezone a parcel north of the previous ,request. ?ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: In comparing the previous and :current proposals for commercial development of this area Staff woulc trate that the two requests differ insomuch as this application is mar rezoning instead of .the Conditional Use requested in the ,previous application. Also, the current parcel is somewhat north sof the previous site. In addition, the renderings submitted with ;the -current application indicate Colonial designed architecture as appposed to the contemporary building style previously intended. �H%wever, and of more importance., is the fact that the current site plancdepicts a more reasonable layout and better utilization of tFhe-parcel than previously proposed. The calculation of proper etbacks has been taken into .consideration and the plan was prepared aaccardingly. _CYf.prime concern in considering future development of the area be- :tween newly aligned Courthouse Road and Branchway Road is existing -emd future area single family use. Although commercial use in the -.area is not thought to be totally out of the question, such development should be restricted and carefully planned so as to -have minimal impact on adjacent -and area residential growth. Resider -Ltial development is anticipated and deemed to be the predominant lanc _use.:in .this area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In its analysis of the proposed land use, Staff _is of the opinion that office use as proposed has merit and is acceptable for this area. Such development offers a reasonable transition from heavier commercial uses to the north (in the vicinit' -cif-Midlothian Turnpike) and predominant residential development to -the :-south. -CASE-HISTORY AND PAST -:BOARD AND COMMISSION ACTION OR THIS REQUEST. :r.P..".C. -12 2.1 -76: .-Deferred -at -the.-request of the Applicant. Z.P.-C. -1-18 -77: _Deferred at .the .request -of the Applicant. C.P..`C. 3115 77: Approval of this request is recommended subject to -a buffer strip which shall consist of the required -setbacks for building setbacks for building and parking as would be applicable under the Office Business (0) Zone. Within this buffer strip, all .-existing trees, five -inches or greater in caliper shall remain undisturbed; however, underbrush may .be removed. Access to and from the property shall be permitted only as shown on the site plan prepared by J. K. Timmons and Associates, dated January 26, 1977, and titled Windsor Executive Center. Spe cifica: only one access to Courthouse Road (Route 653) shall k permitted, and no more than 3 accesses to Branchway Road shall be permitted. 2. �'a��['', pis �� 7 •r, b � fir,3ttlrrrlRlTY6l��:11S,Y 'J!„'��"'�////� Av B-2 ado ♦ : � . v fill s RT 0 IIIIJDy 01 ; � _. •:.;:.- _ �.. Y ;. ,: TITIZtT111�Iy �,r.... � fJ 1,41 en ek- jo 761 -5 ► — --�1 •� At a S ��r 81Y�1"t i4'E ��,• 1"=4000, Ole) Tao. 4 f ,;� ; • s h, fir ` �" , _ Avow e S � � �•� E`er °,�� J f � t S 1 �^ -, • "M� :y� � '1 . Ems. • `:. �~ a :•'•'•f ��"�-J�' �' .iAi '. / q, �•1. ,lr..+Z1rY. -. F .. -rt . •�T�Y �. .. ^'. � •ESr` . r i. .. . I� ., -N, ./ I a t •% ro T t, ro T 4 CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: 77SO35 CREATIVE DISPLAYS INCORPORATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED USE: -for Planned Development (M-1) District. April 27,.1977 - B.S. Amendment of a Conditional Use (Case #73S013) to permit outside storage in a Light Industrial GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Clover Hill Magisterial District, this lot fronts along the west line of Southlake Boulevard, and is located 1,600 feet south of its intersection with Midlothian Turnpike. Tax Map Sec. 17-10 (1) Parcel 4-2 (Sheet 8). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): This lot is -approximately 2 acres in area is zoned Light Industrial (M-1) and is occupied by Creative Displays, Inc. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property is zoned Light Industrial (M-1), and is presently vacant. UTILITIES SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Outside storage on this parcel will have no effect on utilities, soil .profile, etc. PUBLIC FACILITIES: -Development of the parcel in question under the requested -amendment will exercise no additional impact on either existing or future area -public facilities. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: This request will have no effect on the traffic .pattern in this area. GENERAL PLAN: This lot lies in an area designated for industrial use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: Creative Displays, Inc., who are the property owners, are requesting an amendment to the Conditional Use for Planned Development of Southport (Case #73S013) to permit outside storage of steel I -beams, metal sections, and other materials for outdoor advertising poster facings. The Applicant states that the storage area will be screened by a chain link fence with natural color finished slats. Also, shrubs will be .planted in front of the fence to screen the storage area from veiw along Southlanke Boulevard. The Applicant notes that not more than 30% of the area will be used for storage. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: When the schematic plan was presented for Staff and Commission review, Creative Displays indicated that their operation was of such a nature as would require limited outside storage. It was represented that sign and advertising display manufacture: would be restricted to layout work accomplished in a portion of the interi( of the structure to be erected on the parcel. Staff specifically noted that the existing Light Industrial (M-1) zoning and Conditional Use for Planned Development prohibited sign and advertising displays manufacturing as a principle use. It was further emphasized that if such use was desire( 1. (over) then the parcel in question would have to be rezoned to the M-2 classifi- cation or the Conditional Use Planned Development granted Southport amended to permit such use. Staff has been assured that in fact, sign and advertising display manufacturing would not be a principle use conducted on the parcel, but rather the building is to be used for offices and warehousing for Creative Displays Company. It is the opinion of Staff that the Planning Office misunderstood the intent of the operation planned to be conducted on the parcel in addition it also appears that the Applicants misunderstood the requirement of M-1 zoning and the Conditional Use Planned Development granted Southport. Storage of equipment, materials and supplies is an outside activity on the parcel. When the Planned Development of Southport was originally zoned and approve the concept -of development was such that outside storage was prohibited. Staff is of the opinion that approval of the subject request would be unjustifiable departure from both the original intent and understanding - of the Southport development. Staff believes that the Applicant's operation and present use of the parcel is not in keeping with either the approved Conditional Use Planned Development or the existing M-1 zoning (no outside storage permitted). It should also be noted that several potential concerns interested in locating in Southport have been discouraged because the nature of their business operations (requiring outside storage) was similar to Creative Displays and was not permitted under either the existing zoned or Conditional Use Planned Development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the request be denied and the Applicants instructed to cease all outside storage, assembly and manufactul ing on the parcel. It is further recommended that all materials, equipment supplies, machinery for outside assembly and the like be dismantled and removed from the property within a period of 30 days. However, should the Commission see fit, they may wish to recommend that the Conditional Use Planned Development for Southport be amended to permit outside storage on the subject parcel only upon the imposition of the following conditions: 1. No outside storage of equipment, materials, supplies, displays or signs or other materials related to the assembly or erection of signs or any other material associated.with the operation of Creative Displays shall be permitted, except that such outside storage may be allowed in an area not greater than 30% of the in- terior portion of the presently fenced rear yard behind the existing building located on the parcel. 2. This storage area shall further be restricted to that portion of the fenced yard directly adjacent and abutting the rear wall of the existing building (see attached site plan). 3. A fence for screening purposes shall be erected for the length of the storage area (east to west) at either end of the building. This fence shall be ornamental, but solid so as to obscure vision of the storage area. The rear of the storage area may be left open. Outside storage shall not exceed a height greater than the fencing extending on either side of the storage area. 2. /'1 4. This amendment to the Conditional Use Planned Development, shall be restricted to and for Creative Displays, Incorporated and shall not be transferrable nor run with the land. CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION ON THIS REQUEST. C.P.Cr 2 15 77: Deferred. at the request of the Applicant. Staff & Applicant 2 18 77: Upon review of the recommended conditions noted in the February 15, 1977 Staff report, representatives of the Applicant offered the following proposal for conditioning outside storage as requested. 1. Storage shall not exceed an area greater that 3 percent of the interior portion of the -presently fenced rear yard behind the existing building located on the subject parcel. x. Storage of materials, which when stored will extend greater than 4 feet from the ground, shall be limited to an area immediately adjacent to the rear wall of the existing building and shall be screened on the north and south by solid extension from the rear of the existing building which shall be of sufficient height and length to sufficiently screen any stored materials from view from the north and south of the subject property. 3. Storage of such materials, which do not exceed 4 feet in height when stored,shall be limited to the northwestern corner of the presently fenced in rear area of the subject parcel, and shall be limited to orderly racks designed for such storage. 4. The existing 6 foot security fence,surrounding the rear yard of the subject parcel, shall be screened in an ornamental but solid fashion so as to obscure vision of the storage area. 5. In any event, all items stored on the subject property shall be sufficiently screened by the 6 foot security fence,or the aforedescribed building extensions, so as not to be visible .from the adjoining properties to the north, east or south of the subject parcel. After studying the proposal, and viewing the site on the February 15 field trip, it was the concensus of the Commission that recommended Staff condition number 3 be rewritten in the following manner: All materials, equipment, supplies, machinery and it s for display shall be stored within a shed (with or without a roof) attached to the rear wall of the existing building. This shed shall be constructed of similar materials used in construction of the existing building. The shed shall be enclosed on 3 sides (rear -west side may be open). Staff would still emphasize that this request is not in keeping with the Development of Southport and should be denied. 3. C.P.C. 3 15 77:- Recommended approval of an amendment to Conditional. Use (Case #73S013) for a Planned Development, to permit the outside storage of materials on the subject. parcel, subject to the. following conditions: 1. Na -outside storage of equipment, materials, supplies, displays or other signs or other materials related to the assembly of signs, or any other material associated with the operation of Creative Displays, except that such outside storage may be allowed in an area not greater than 30 percent of the interior portion of the presently fenced rear yard behind.the existing building located an. the parcel... Z. Storage of such materials, which do not -exceed 4 feet in height wb en stored, shall be limited to the northwest corner of the pre- sently fenced in rear area of the subject parcel, and shall be limited to racks designed for such storage and erected in an orderll fashion.. 3. The existing 6 foot security fence, surrounding the rear yard of the subject parcel, shall -be screened in an ornamental but solid fashion so as to completely obscure vision.of the storage area. 4. In lieu of Condition #3 above, the Applicant may construct a 15 foot high wood panel fence or masonry wall from the northeast corner of the existing office building, north on a line with the existing fence. Further, he may extend this 15 foot high wood panel fence or masonry wall in a westerly direction for approximate) 80 feet along the line of the existing chainlink fence. The Applicant.shall submit a plan to the Division of Development Review for approval of the type of material and construction which wi1:1. be used for the wood panel_ fence or wall. 4. . � � iai11111►1i "tantntae � r �IP v r �'�O ' t1at111tatt�yt{alUly • tate{{{{ft � oe» " ttttttttt u �. ltittt10. t{ttt{tttct,10do -Elitist I !!!!!!htrJli i I. !J w lad 111 / /,• •\ �_ ' [., yam% :_.�-� .•,��..... �:;:.�i�!,,,;_--_---_ � __ J» .�.�. 30=•rar�•cc titva ft-6— � • wwt w�.tt •N � • 1 •XJ CA •' f Q� 6 13 f• i ( r A •_-1 r' —•� w lad 111 / /,• •\ �_ ' [., yam% :_.�-� .•,��..... �:;:.�i�!,,,;_--_---_ � __ J» .�.�. 30=•rar�•cc titva ft-6— � • wwt w�.tt •N � • Apri27, 1977- B.S. B rch-iS;-ig77-TC — -j CAM' NUMBER: 775039 APPLICANT: SIMMONS REALTY, INCORPORATED BEQUEST AND 'PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential JR -7). The Applicant plans to subdivide this property for single family residential use and construct approximately 358 single family dwellings. RAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP' IDENTIFICATION: In Clover Hill Magisterial District, this.parcel lies on the west line of Belmont Road, and is located opposite the Land Of Pines Subdivision. Tax Map 65-1 (1) Parcels 1 & 4 (Sheet 21/22). See the attached zoning map and parcel plat ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): This parcel contains approximately 140 acres, is zoned Agricultural A) and is presently vacant and wooded. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property to the northeast i. zoned Residential (R-7) and is occupied by Land of Pines Subdivision. Property to the east, along the west line of Belmont Road, is zoned Residential (R-7). Property to the south, west and north is zoned Agricultural (A). Adjacent property is occupied by a single family dwelling or remains wooded and vacant. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Public water and sewer is available for development of this parcel. The Applicant states that the subdivision will contain approximately 358 lots. The Utilities Department reports that an average single family residence uses 240 gallons of water per day, therefore, 85,920 gallons per day would be utilized by this development. These per unit flows are not line design flows, because peak flow plus fire service flow must be considered for design purposes. There is an available water treatment capacity of 10 million gallons per day from Swift Creek serving this area with 6 to 7 million gallons per day being used. There is a 16 inch water line located along Belmont Road in Pennwood Subdivision, a distance of approximately 4,000 feet from the subject property. It is estimated that the cost of providing public water will be approximately $80,000. Off-site costs for bringing water to this property must be financed by the developer. The County calculates per capita sewage flow at 100 gallons per day for design purposes. Based on an average of 3.5 persons per single family dwelling unit, approximately 1,253 gallons per day of sewage effluent wil: be generated for treatment by the proposed subdivision. These sewage treatment figures are greater than the water used because of infiltration and inflow. This property lies in the Licking Creek, Falling Creek Sewer Drainage area. The closest trunk sewer is located in the Pennwood Subdivision which lies approximately 1,400 feet north of this property on Belmont Road. This sewer trunk will serve this project and will connect to the Falling Creek Treatment Plant. 1. over I The soils on this parcel are generally sandy loam; are nearly level to sloping, and have only a slight chance for erosion. Seventy-five ;percent is well suited for septic tanks. Low areas should have extensive drainage plans for each foundation. See attached soil study map. "-o"ff-site water and sewer drainage easements will be required. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Based on the 1977 average of 0.90 public school students per single family dwelling, approximately 322 students would be generated by -this development. This subdivision is now within the Chalkley Milementary,.Falling Creek Junior High and Manchester High School atten- .dance zones. 2h s.subdivision will be served by the Manchester Fire Station, Company ',2., which is operated by County employees. At this time, we believe ,tthe-fire service capability for this area is inadequate to serve the _proposed subdivision due to the lack of a sufficient and reliable water supply. In the immediate area of this request, there are five (5) other ,subdivisions in various states of development. Serious consideration 'should be given to providing this area with an adequate water distributio -system before any other single family residential development in this area is permitted. It appears that the five (5) developers in this :area should get together and arrange a cost sharing plan to offset the ;financial burden on one individual. -TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: Single family development under the proposed -p an would result—En—the generation of approximately 3,508 average daily .traffic based on an estimate of 9.8 trips Der single family residence. .These vehicular movements would be distributed over Belmont Road. It _should be noted that as indicated in the Highway Department's 1975/1974 :Primary and Secondary Road Traffic Counts, the following average daily traffic on area roads have been experienced: (see attached traffic map) A- Belmont, from Licking Creek to Cogbill - 931 ADT; !a. Belmont, from Cogbill to Cannock - 483 ADT; c- Belmont, from Fairpines to Turner - 948 ADT; d» Belmont, from Turner to Clairton - 4,089 ADT; P_ Cogbill, from Belmont to Canasta - 690 ADT. Staff finds that Belmont Road, in the area of the request, is surface -treated and of irregular width. Reconstruction of Belmont Road, from Turner Road to Fairpines Road, is presently under consideration by VDH&T. This work could be accomplished sometime within the next five years. :Full development of this subdivision before the reconstruction of Belmont :Road -count create a hazardous traffic situation in this area. -The proposed subdivision will be located approximately 1 1/4 miles north- west of the Chesterfield County Airport. We find that the noise level Exposure for single family residential development will be compatible with the Airport operation. It should be noted that the northern half of this project lies in the Horizontal Surface area of the County Airport height obstruction limits, and the southern section lies within the Approach Surface area of the height obstruction limits. Depending on ground elevation at a particular location, structures will be limited from 90 feet to 140 feet in height. 2. M M GENERAL PLAN: This parcel lies in an area designated for single family residential use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: In this case, the Applicant has a contract with Fred A. Muse Estate, through First and Merchants Bank, to purchase this property. The Applicant plans to subdivide this property for single family residential use.- They anticipate the creation of 358 building lots. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: The subdivision of Land of Pines lies northeast of the subject property and is zoned Residential (R-7). Directly north of this parcel, is the Subdivision of Pennwood, which is zoned Residential (R-9) and consists of 182 lots. The traffic which will be generated when this project is fully developed will use Belmont Road as its primary access road, north and south. Property to the east, along the east line Agricultrual (A), is large and vacant and subdivision. The land lying to the south (A) and for the most part, is undeveloped future subdivision. Glenwood Subdivision property and is zoned Residential (R-9). of Belmont Road, is zoned has good potential for future and west is zoned Agricultural with a good potential for is located northwest of this In view of the present traffic density along Belmont Road and the added traffic that this project will create, it appears that the Applicant should plan for one or more outlets to either the north, northwest or west of this property and direct some of this traffic to Newby's Bridge Road. Staff notes that a 50 foot wide Colonial Pipeline easement runs through the center of this property from east to west. Also, there is a 150 foot wide VEPCO easement which runs along the southern property lin, of this parcel. Pennnwood Subdivision, which is zoned R-7, lies north of this property, and consists of 182 lots. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of Residential (R-7) zoning. CASE HISTORY AND PAST BOARD AND COMMISSION ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST. C.P.C. 3 15 77: Recommended approval of the request. 3. .41 E �F`:•i• 1/�`� ✓77 503 Y \ �'=foo' 9TVR7 \ I 7 7 :5-7 wOD Z• I I l 10 Is ,V 51A DdC, 9 LE 77503? J:? A CASe NO. 77.5'03? -r, ewp/ES ONt.Y 17/- C -J C LA -7 Ey Se-PIAIICA S I)w vOhg 'F. S.4Noy GOAAn 111-4-1- RAI N S- t3[ -NDC -AJ S - e,44,415. So; L 'tY pe s F-kf•1 A&-LUVIAL LAPvp,WET Fov�DAT/eNS /PoADS C -' FA x 54Noy L•,4)" /-�-8-! 1<EIrPS!/iGLE SA+vDy LoAk+ 'j4-�-1 GffE}t FA:�iEL O S/tNOy LIA�y Ha -e-1; G -1,C-2; D-Z� Fdf� �EPTJ G. �Anl KS LOAMy - CRgOE LL.f Sr-0fMENi S y9-8-1 - SELlS!//GLE SA.vay L1,�,.� ' 7o•6 -J _ i firtaL3oRo Se�a�y GIk�, 7�1 _ B_1 -• Goy ps Ba/� o �- SA Ar C>•/ Z-44-67 v e0 -B f — LYN c.11'Q� Q G S�tNi�y , LO f�Ah 17/- C -J C LA -7 Ey Se-PIAIICA S I)w vOhg 'F. S.4Noy GOAAn 111-4-1- RAI N S- t3[ -NDC -AJ S - e,44,415. %56 [L ��L7 F�� Fov�DAT/eNS /PoADS CONOiTIeNAC Fo,E 6EPT41e- TAN4:S CvOop Fv2 PdJNpAi 1oNS 000a7 -FOL Fdf� �EPTJ G. �Anl KS �o�� Fo,e Fat�NOATioNS D o v BTF� �� 'A,SEJvjEN 1 S POOcZ Fob ✓EP-rle 7-,44f..5 Fpe AGL CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: r � *400 April 27, 1977 - B.S_ Marek -a P-. e-. 77SO40 LAVERNE C. COLE, et.al. REQUEST AND PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential R-7). The Applicant has subdivided this property and increased the lot area of lots 9 through 14, Blk A, Sect A, Buxton, see enclosure 1. GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Bermuda Magisterial District this parcel is the northern 250 feet on lots 9-14, Blk A, Sect A, Buxton, as resubdivided. Tax Map 114-7 (3) Buxton, Sec. A, B1k.A, Lots 9,10,11,12 13:& 14 (Sheet 31);see enclosure 2. ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): These lots contain approximately 4.03 acres, are zoned Agricultural (A) and are vacant. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property to the north and west is zoned Agricultural (A) and is wooded and vacant or is occupied by single family dwellings. Adjacent property to the east and south is zoned Residential (R-7) and is occupied by single family dwellings or remains vacant. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Public water is available for development of this parcel. Public sewer is not feasible -at this time. In this case, the Applicant has increased the lot area of lots 9 through 14 in order to provide area for septic tank and drainfield systems. The soils in this area are wet and clay,gently sloping to moderately steep and have only a slight chance for erosion. In general, the soils are varible; low areas have high seasonal water tables. Steep slopes are seedy and are poor for foundations and septic tank systems. This parcel lies in the Great Branch Drainage Pattern. Development of this property could cause a drainage and erosion problem. Prior to any clearing or building on this parcel, a site plan and an erosion control plan must be approved. Drainage and utility easements will be required. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Development for the proposed use should have no detriment impact on either existing or future area public facilities. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: This project will have no noticeable traffic impact. GENERAL PLAN: These lots lie in an area designated for single family residen- tial use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant, who is the owner of this property, requests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7). On October 26, 1976, the Planning Commission approved the resubdivision of lots 10-14, 1. over Blk A, Sect A, Buxton. This resubdivision added to lots 10-14 the area in this request; see enclosures 1 & 3. At present the front section of lots 9-14, which front along Buxton Drive, are zoned Residential (R-7), and the rear section Agricultural (A). Approval of this rezoning will provide for like zoning on the entire lot. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: The resubdivision of lots 10-14 to increase their depth was necessary because of poor soil conditions and in order to find suitable land for septic tank drainfields. This re- zoning is in keeping with the rezoning of the adjacent properties. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval of the request is recommended. CASE HI'STORr AND PAST BOA -07A COMMISSION ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST. C.P.C. 3 15 77: Approval of the requested R-7 rezoning was recommended. 2. v A / 1 776 4.6 ro w w p . � w � w . � r ' y- 11111111 CD Qi , U 1 v I MARY L. PA.MLE.-TT 0 LA y 0 C 0 0 0 0 C) 0 y 0 0 1575*4C;2-T"E - U—TlLV—r%E!E IG701' I (P Z: -4 0 0 N (P u 4 U :-41 0 o Q • j5LOCK /A < ux 10000' 100.00' 100 00' loo 00 100-00 BUXToki DRIVE %{466 J SD i V 16 L 0 n5 /0 7,40 l¢ .:, .8[K. A , �u .,g , 13,.x,..._ EPARTIdE91 AV '—!- LUf�JSWOOD ROAD -- -- SIC7'213"W ► �J^ G1J uBD. 0 N I � t 3 4 I \5� 0 3LOCK "C' z I S SIG°07' ZIII"Wt 2.50. 10' =cc ;S; PiPe�F w �- �^ r x N I O t � W `� S✓ � o� � 0 I I 2 0 o co I— h c O 71 X I � O °� 0 � I I N m c0------�-- I----- tnONh t O � 2 N ? 25' i9 E °D b d 251.92 IS n CASE NUMBER: 77SO41 April, 1977 - B.S. APPLICANT: EDWARD J. WILLIS, JR., & DAVID L. MCKINNEY REQUEST AND PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential R-7). The Applicants intend to subdivide this property for single family residential use, see attached plat. GENERAL LOCATION TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Midlothian Magisterial District, this parcel fronts along the northeast line of Robious Road and is located approximately 120 feet northwest of its intersection with Wrens Nest Road. Tax Map 17-2 (1) Parcels 2-1, 2-3, 2-4, & 9 (Sheet 8). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): The parcel contains 4.75 acres, is zoned Agricultural (A) and is vacant, except for a small building which is used for a church. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property to the east, north and west is zoned Residential (R-7), and is occupied by single family dwellings and Greenfield Elementary School which lies to the north. Pro- perty to the south is zoned Residential (R-9) and is being subdivided for single family residential use. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Public water and sewer is available to serve this parcel. The developer plans to subdivide this parcel and create 20 building lots. The Utilities Department currently reports than an average single family residence uses 240 gallons of water per day. Therefore, 4,800 gallons per day would be utilized by this development. These per unit flows are not line design flows because peak flow plus fire service flow must be consid- ered for design purposes. There is an available water treatment capacity of 10 million gallons per day from Swift Creek, serving this area with 6 to 7 million gallons per day now being used. A 16 inch water line on Robious Road, across from this parcel, will provide public water. The County Engineer calculates per capita sewage flow at 100 gallons per day for design purposes. Based on an average of 3.5 persons per single family residence, approximately 70 gallons per day of sewage effluent would be generated for treatment by the proposed subdivison. These sewage treatment figures are greater than the water used because of infil- tration and inflow. The sewer truck in Wrens Nest Road,which will serve this project, will connect to the City of Richmond Treatment Plant. The majority of the soils are sandy loam; nearly level to gently sloping and have only a slight chance for erosion. The rear of the property has clay soils and a high seasonal water table which are very poor for founda- tions. This section of the property will require extensive drainage plans for each foundation. This property lies in the Falling Creek Drainage Pattern and has very poor drainage. Prior to clearing or building, a site plan and erosion control plan must be submitted. 1. over PUBLIC FACILITIES: Development of the parcel in quebtion sould have no verse impact on either existing or future public facilities. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: This parcel fronts along Robious Road which is currently under construction to a 24 foot wide pavement with shoulders. The additional traffic this project will create will have little or no impact on area traffic. GENERAL PLAN: This parcel lies in an area designated for single family residential use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicants, who are the property owners, request the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7). The Applicants intend to subdivide this property and create 20 building lots. A tentative subdivision plan has been submitted and will be heard by the Planning Commission on March 22, 1977; see enclosure 1. The developers plan to use County water and sewer and provide curb and gutter. The average size lot will be 8,224 square feet in area. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: Generally speaking, what residential rezoning has occured in this area has been in the. R-7 and R-9 classificatic Therefore, the subdivision of the parcel in question under the R-7 classification should be acceptable, utilizing public water and sewer. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of this request. CASE HISTORY AND PAST BOARD AND COMMISSION ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST. C.P.C. 3 15 77: Recommended approval of the application. 2. I j•" .. •„ r Cjrecneld FLE,v}EIV nrIAC� r i. , M r L ` JB -2 tea, {t71� RT 66 � - ttitlltll 1{t{{tlt% 111111 r. � _ 13 11111111{ :8 � 1r� i + r 1 •• r r V • r r ` r S _ ,tt71 r �f�ltil►1111111L771lllijllli!_ � _ e" a I vit7lk* ""g n L� 11 H z 7750�' moo' A 1'/J z �j \✓ , f + s to w it, JD 91 r • O i \� • , 01 I l w •� °I C` w w r i. , M r L ` JB -2 tea, {t71� RT 66 � - ttitlltll 1{t{{tlt% 111111 r. � _ 13 11111111{ :8 � 1r� i + r 1 •• r r V • r r ` r S _ ,tt71 r �f�ltil►1111111L771lllijllli!_ � _ e" a I vit7lk* ""g n L� 11 H z 7750�' moo' A 1'/J z �j \✓ , f + s to w I m 4 CHESTERFIELD. CCUN-r V SCHOOL PROPSR-ry cb TREASURE Is 0 tp 610 Ac SETT' L LAND BLOC X: Ic RC F� N5 r 4 i=,5 4,:.,Ck L: E-A.T'D 5o TENTATIVE MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT CHES7rER r= I ELD CO.) VIRGINIA - SCALE - I" z 1 -Or 4 DA -FE:: 0, CABG 77 Socia - z, FLET ¢o° G- ple. 9 dNLY X000 ®R= (s- Md -n -14J4 larfa 74--t', ( ALL/jt(a0kO 4 CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: 77SO43 A. TREDWAY LAYNE April 27, 1977 - B. S. +%+5-,-3x,)-7-7--(t:i- REQUEST AND PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Residential (R-7) to Office Business (0). It is the intent of the Applicant to construct a professic: al office building on this parcel. GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Bermuda Magisterial Distric- this lot fronts along the south line of West Hundred Road (Route 10) and is located approximately 300 feet northeast of its intersection with Ecoff Avenue. Tax Map 115-10 (2) Snead -Curtis, Lots 15A & 16 (Sheet 32). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE, (SUBJECT PARCEL): This parcel contains approximately 0.72 acre, is zoned Residential (R-7) and is presently vacant. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING ARID LAND USE: Adjacent property to the east .is zoned Community Business (B-2), while all other property is zoned Residential (R-7). Adjacent property to the east is being used for commercial purposes, while all other adjacent property is occupied by single family dwellings ro remains vacant. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Public water is available to serve this parcel; a six inch water line is located along -West Hundred Road. There is an available water treatment capacity of 29 million gallons per day from the Appomattox and Falling Creek serving this area with 4 million gallons per day now being used. This project lies in the Proctor's Creek Sewer Drainage Area. The sewer trunk will will serve this project will connect to the Proctor's Creek Sewage Treatment Plant and the Chester Lagoon. Their rated capacity for sewage treatment is 1 million gallons per day; however, there is a 4 million gallon per day plant now under construction. This project may require the developer to provide a lateral service across West Hundred Road. The soils on this property are loamy sandy, gently sloping and have only a slight chance for erosion. In general., the soil is well suited for the proposed project. Sewer is recommended for this project; however if a drainfield is used, it must be located prior to clearing the land. yThese soils are well suited for roadways and foundations; favorable for septic tank and drainfield. This parcel lies in the Ashton Creek Drainage Pattern. No off-site drain- age or erosion problems are envisioned at this time. Prior to constructic an erosion control plan must be submitted and approved, at which time, drainage easementment may be required. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Development for the proposed use should have no detri- mental impact on either existing or future area public facilities. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: Traffic in the area of the request is quite heavy and conjested. The widening of Route 10 in the area of the request is pending a decision on the location of I-95/85. 1. over It should be noted as indicated in the Highway Department's 1975 Primary Road Traffic County, the average daily traffic on West Hundred Road, in the area of the request, was 9,225 ADT. The Applicant should attempt to coordinate access to West Hundred Road with the adjacent property owners. GENERAL PLAN: This lot lies in an area designated for commercial use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant, who is the owner of the property, requests the rezoning from Residential (R-7) to Office Business (0). It is the intent of the owner to construct a professional office building on this property, see enclosure 1. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: Staff reviewed enclosure 1 and has revised the site plan to conform to zoning requirements in regard to setbacks, buffer area and parking requirements, see enclosed alternative Staff site plan. In considering the zoning pattern in this area, the request for reclassi- fication to Office Business (0) seems appropriate since adjacent property to the east is zoned Community Business (B-2) and other parcels in the vicinity, fronting Route 10, are zoned Convenience Business (B-1). The Office Business classification would pot permit retail sales and there- fore, restrict adverse impact resulting from additional heavier commer- cial traffic generation. Further commercial development of adjacent pro- perty to the west is expected to occur at some future time. However, unti this is a reality, Planning Staff is of the opinion that a buffer should be created along the west line of the subject parcel, whereby adequate screening of adjacent residential property can be accomplished. It is felt that a buffer consisting of a fence along the western property line would not only protect the adjacent property, but would enhance developme: of the subject site. It should be noted that a fence between residential and commercially zoned parcels is a requirement of the Zoning Ordinance. In.reviewing the preliminary plans submitted with the application, Staff suggests that no access to the alley to the south be provided since this alley is only 10 feet wide. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the request is recommended subject to a 10 foot wide buffer strip being provided along the west property line. No parking or driveways shall be permitted within this buffer. In addi- tion, along the eastern edge of the buffer, (off -set from west property line), an ornamental wood fence or brick wall, not less than 6 feet in height shall be constructed. The area between the fence/wall and property line shall be planted with evergreen trees and shrubs in a random landscaping pattern. This buffer strip will be void and of no effect if the property to the west is developed for non-residential purposes. 2. 1 CASE HISTORY AND PAST BOARD AND COMMISSION ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST. C.P.C. 3 15 77: Recommended approval of Office Business (0) zoning, subject to the condition that a 3 foot wide buffer be provided along the west property line. No parking or driveway shall be permitted within this buffer. In addition, an ornamental wood fence or brick wall, not less than 6 feet in height, shall, be constructed for the entire length of the west property line. The area of the buffer shall be planted with trees and shrubs in a random landscaping pattern. This buffer strip shall be void and of no effect if the property to the west is developed for non-residential purposes. 3. sale MEMORANDUM DATE: April 27, 1977 TO: Chesterfield County ief,Board ervisors FROM: Stanley R. Balderson, Jr., ChDevelopment Review Division SUBJECT: Addendum to Staff Report for Case #77SO42 It should be noted that at the March 15, 1977 Planning Commission hearing of this request, Mr. Davis requested that the Commission add another condition to the Staff recommendations which would require that the alley easement behind lots 17, 16, and 15, of Blk. D, Section C, of Deerfield Estates, be vacated. Staff explained to the Commission and Mr. Davis that the rezoning could not be legally conditioned in this manner. Mr. Davis was instructed, however, that this easement might be vacated provided the proper plat was submitted to the County Right -Of -Way Engineer and a petition to the Board of Supervisors for vacation is accomplished. It was noted that this action would be Mr. Davis's responsibility and the County Administration (Department of Commu- nity Development and Department of Utilities) would have to review the proposed vacation upon submission of the request to determine if it was necessary to retain the easement for drainage and utility purposes. SRB/jp CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: M 77SO42 ZANE G.. DAVIS AND HENRY MYERS April , 1977 - B.S. REQUEST AND PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Residential (R-15) to Office Business (0). It is the intent of the Applicant to construct office buildings on the parcel in question. GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Dale Magisterial District, this parcel fronts along the west line of Iron Bridge Road (Route 10), and is located approximately 100 feet south of its intersection with Deerfield Drive. Tax Map 95-7 (1) Parcel 1 and Tax Map 95-3 (2) Deerfield Estates Sect A, Blk A, Lots 2,3,4, & 5 (Sheet 31). See attached zoning map and subdivision plat. ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): This property contains approximately 7 acres, is zoned Residential (R-15) and is presently vacant. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property to the west and north is zoned Residential (R-15), property to the northeast is zoned Community Business (B-2), and property to the east and south .is zoned Agricultural (A). Adjacent property to the west and north is occupied by Deerfield Estates Subdivision, while property to the east and south remains vacant. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMEN A 16 inch water line would serve this parcel and is available along Route 10, across from this property. Water is provided by the Appomattox and falling Creek plants which have a design or rated capacity of 29 million gallons per day and presently use approximatel 4 million gallons per day. It should be noted that the amounty of water available for fire protection in this area is somewhat limited. This project lies in the Proctor's Creek Sewer Drainage Area. This project can be served by sewer which is under construction in the Deerfield Subdivision. This property is served by the Centra Lagoon and the Proctor's Creek Sewer Treatment Plant. This project should use public water and sewer. Eighty percent or more of this parcel has poorly drained soils with high seasonal water table; see attached soil map. Soils are poorly suited for roadways and foundations. This project will require extensive sub -surface drainage planning in conjunction with control compaction on fill areas. This land is gently sloping to nearly flat with only a slight chance of erosion. Only the northern section of this parcel is suited for the proposed project. This property lies in the Swift Creek Darainage Pattern and the flat topography has very poor drainage. Prior to clearing or approva of any building permits, detailed site plans for erosion control and road construction will have to be submitted and approved by the 1. over � t County Engineer and the State Highway Department. Presently, it appears that this project will require extensive storm sewer to permit the area to properly drain. Off-site utility and drainage easements will be required. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Development of the proposed use should have no detrimental impact on either existing or future area public facilities This project will be served by the Dale Fire Station, Company #11, which is a volunteer unit. Their present fire service capability is sufficient with an adequate water supply to serve this project. The nearest fire hydrant is approximately 800 feet from the most remote property line, therefore, at least one fire hydrant should be installed on this site. Thie requirement is in keeping with nationally recognized standards. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: Iron Bridge Road, in the area of the request is presently a two lane primary highway. Iron Bridge Road will be widened to four lanes sometime in the future. This project lies in Traffic Zone 258. It should be noted that as indicated in the Highway Department's 1975 Primary Road Traffic Counts, the average daily traffic in the area of the request is 7,800 ADT. This project should be Coordinated with future Iron Bridqe Road widening plans. Also, the number of accesses on Iron Bridge Road should be minimized and coordinated with future cross-over locations. GENERAL PLAN: This property lies in an area designated for single family residential use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant, who is the owner of this property, requests the rezoning from Residential (R-15) to Office Business (0). It is intended that professional office buildings be constructed on this site. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: In reviewing this request, it is important to consider the zoning and land use pattern in this area. The parcel in question fronts the west line of Route 10 and the property across the road for the most part comprise those parcels making up the Chesterfield Courthouse Complex. Commercial zoning has occured to the north and southeast of the parcel, and it is anticipated that professional offices as well as limited retail use will occur along Route 10, from the County Airport, southeastwardly to the Krause and Centralia Road intersections. Development of the parcel in question, under 0 zoning, would be in keeping with the expected trend for the development of properties in this -area. However, because of the development of Deerfield Estates Subdivision, which is adjacent to the west of the request parcel, Planning Staff is of the opinion that no commercial zoning should be permitted unles adequate buffering of this residentially developable property is accomplished. In this respect, the parcel in question extends for 1,339.44 feet along the rear of adjacent subdivided lots. A wooded buffer not less than 50 feet in depth should be provided in this area. 2. Staff has also note that the parcel lies within the Airport height obstruction limits, and therefore, buildings erected on the parcel will have to observe relative limitations applicable at the time of construction. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the requested Office Business (0) rezoning is recommended subject to a buffer strip being provided which will consist of the rear (west) 50 feet of depth of the parcel for the entire 1,339.44 foot length parallel to Route 10. Within this buffer strip, all existing trees, five inches or greater in caliper shall remain undisturbed; however, underbrush may be removed. Parking areas and driveways shall be prohibited wihtin this buffer strip. CASE HISTORY AND PAST BOARD AND COMMISSION ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST. C.P.C. 3 15 77: Recommended approval of Office Business (0) zoning subject to the following conditions: 1. A 75 foot buffer be provided along the north property line, separating the subject parcel from the Wells' property. The first 50 feet of the buffer strip, measured from the Wells' property line, shall include all existing trees, five inches or greater in caliper remaining undisturbed; however, underbrush may be removed. The remaining 25 foot of the buffer area may be used for recreational purposes. 2. A 25 foot buffer strip shall be provided along the west property line. It shall run for the entire depth of the subject parcel. Within this buffer strip, all existing trees, 5 inches or greater in caliper shall remain undisturbed; however, underbrush may be r moved. Parking areas and driveways shall be prohibited within this buffer strip. 3. LIMITS r ICTION • n CHESTERFIEI COURTHOU: U—/ viy L i1s11iliieiae'es j:'� 5 4s*ftf}Zt�' r j 'lips 11filial 111/111111711; t v * so¢ z -Al, Li a 'n Lu w m �m �m i • 0 Z AN Id a. it -P 0 m �m �m i � O i co I \/ 301:ro \ SCALE AiciTE /Q r/^97' R/w )ADMY4A11.44OV4,-C JQrN m •w '„"9�'.' w. ' 1.� '.' t.' i! m I re ! i t� -{t rt�,.. Z /�:: p�.r••. . F� Y; Y�.. f{.'lst�t� 1 .� I * 1. , (1 +/ � `•�Ii • •-+�-s--.�._...._ �„� •"� . ' � '' • .•'•.fir rih • ., r. 1 . If. 1 Al .:u;� gip. -Y- u: a9't.; • • � =lvq� 44 ) �� ' , aM1.%I � �1 - . � � � .:.. `�,. w..��1-.at;! •. .. • + . ... +..•.... - : � .. �,. ; mow. •��..tr••^r --�-s--;. - R'�: ^�•:'^. �-----�• �: " � •. � Iw H✓• -.r •: .�"'�•�;•t+...��'•+�',.."' rn., ,rte:• '�' �'��iRJ�/'ti.��'h'��- •. A•y,-, '_ �M�_~-�./\�-•�..+I� �� +1 .�.,♦'t` � ��:L •V.n:. �«� ��•?'ri-�`•.:V.tiv,..`��.�,. .. � .. ,+r,� v -1 Will ff/ tpy; 1 �G9i .Alp 301, n u .A r A *00 April 27, 1977 - B.S. 4a:rek-1-5,--1474-+C-rgrG r)- CASE NUMBER: 77SO44 APPLICANT: M. SHEVEL AND JEAN F. SIFF REQUEST AND PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Convenience Business (B-1) to General Business (B-3). The Applicant intends to construct a Wendy's Old Fashioned Hamburger Restaurant on this parcel. GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Midlothian Magisterial District, this parcel fronts along the north line of Midlothian Turnpike and is located opposite its intersection with Ruthers Road. Tax Map 18-16 (1) Parcels 33 and 33-2 (Sheet 8). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE, (SUBJECT PARCEL): This parcel contains approximately 1.27 acres, is zoned Convenience Business (B-1) and is occupied by a commercial bakery and beauty parlor which are housed in three one-story buildings. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property to the north and east is zoned Mcbile Home Park (MH-1), to the south is zoned General Business (B-3). The property to the north and east is occupied by, a Mobile Home Park, while property to the south and west is occupied by various commercial enterprises. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMEN A 12 inch water line is located along Route 10 to serve this parcel. Water is available on site. There is an available water treatment capacity of 10 million gallons per day from Swift Creek, serving this area,with 6 to 7 million gallons per day not being used. This parcel lies in the Powhite Creek Sewer Drainage Area. This project should use public sewer. Sewer is located behind the Buford Shopping Center, which is located adjacent to and northwest of this property. The sewer line will have to be extended from the rear of the shopping center to this property. The soil on this parcel is sandy loam, gently sloping with only a slight chance for erosion. the soils on this property are well suited for the proposed use. The soil is well drained, good for foundations and road'aays, and conditional for septic tanks. This parcel lies in the Falling Creek Drainage Pattern. Prior to clearing or the issuing of a building permit, a plan for erosion control must be submitted. This request will require an off-site sewer easement. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Development for the proposed use should have no detrimental impact on either existing or future public facilities. This property will be provided fire service by the Bon Air Fire Station, which is manned by County employees. This station can provide adequate fire service for this property. 1. over TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: Traffic along Midlothian Turnpike, in the area of the request, is quite heavy and conjested. Midlothian Turnpike should be widened to 6 lanes in the near future. This request lies in Traffic Zone 221. It should be noted that an indicated in the Highway Department's 1975 Primary Road Count the average daily traffic on Midlothian Turnpike, in the area of the request, was 34,090 ADT. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant, who is the property owner, requests the rezoning from Convenience Business (B-1) to General Business (B-3 The Applicant intends to construct a Wendy's Old Fashioned Hamburger Restaurant on this parcel. The operation will have facilities for dining inside and a drive-in window for meals to go. The Applicant states that public water and sewer will be used for this project. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGA^ING MEASURES: The area encompassing the request parcel is located along that portion of Midlothian Turnpike which is developing from medium to heavy commercial use. All adjacent property, with the exception of that parcel to the north, is occupied by various commercial enterprises. The parcel to the north has been developed for a mobile home park and since such a use is residential in character, some consideration for buffering the mobile home park from whatever use might be made of the subject parcel, should be considered. In this respect, reasonable fencing as opposed to vegatative planting would seem in order. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the request is recommended subject to a buffer strip being provided along the rear property line. This buffer strip shall consist of a solid board fence, constructed to a height not less than 6 feet. This buffer shall extend for the entire width of the rear portion of the parcel. CASE HISTORY AND PAST BOARD AND COMMISSION ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST. C.P.C. 3 15 77: Recommended approval of General Business (B-3) zonin subject to the condition that a buffer strip be provided along the rear property line. This buffer strip shall consist of a solid board fence, constructed to a height of not less than 6 feet. This buffer shall extend for the entire length of the rear portion of the parcel. 2. riaaa•r'aaa� its etaan ! — slow"a`a''' fllfi{+lff a+f f ff { aaat ---r- N CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: 29 77SO45 CLARENCE G. CONNER April427, 1977 - B.S. REQUEST AND PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Community Business (B-2) to General Business (B-3). The Applicant intends to use an existing building for a motor vehicles repair shop. GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Matoaca Magisterial Distric- this parcel fronts along the east line of Jefferson Davis Highway and is located in the northwest quadrant of its intersection with Milhorn Street, Tax Map 149-11 (2) Milhorn Tract, Blk E, Lots 1, 2, & 3 (Sheet 41). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE, (SUBJECT PARCEL): This lot, which is 1.76 acres in area, is also zoned Community Business (B-2) and is currently occupied by a motorcycles repair shop and a gasoline service station. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property to the north, east and south is zoned Community Business (B-2), while property to the west is zoned Residential (R-7). Adjacent property is occupied by single family dwellings or remains vacant. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Public water is available to serve this project and is on site. There is an available water treatment capacity of 26 million gallons per day from the Appomattox Treatment Plant serving this area with 1 million gallons per day now being used. This lot lies in the Timsberry Creek Sewer Drainage Area. Public sewer will be available to serve this property at the intersection of Jefferson Davis Highway and Milhorn Street in approximately 2 months. Any future improvements on this property should use public water and sewer. The soil on this property varies between loam and sandy loam. The land is gently sloping to sloping with only a slight chance for erosion. In general, the soils are well suited for this project. The soil is well drained and very well suited for foundations and roadways. This project is in the Timsberry Creek Drainage Pattern. Prior to any improvements on the parcel, a site plan for erosion control must be sub- mitted for approval. This request will not require any off-site easement: PUBLIC FACILITIES: The proposed use should have no detrimental impact on either existing or future public facilities. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: In the area of the request, Jefferson Davis Highway is heavily traveled, but it is in good condition. There are no planned improvements for Jefferson Davis Highway at this time. This request lies in traffic zone 322. It should be noted that an indicated in the Highway Department's 1975/76 Primary and Secondary Road Traffic Counts, the following average daily traffic on area roads have been experienced: a. Jefferson Davis Highway - 11,105 ADT; b. Milhorn Street - 1,204 ADT. 1. over GENERAL PLAN: This lot lies in an area designated for commercial use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant, who is the owner of this property, has requested that rezoning from Community Business (B-2) to General Business (B-3). The building on the property is presently being used for a gas station operation and a motocycle repair shop. ALTERNATIVES' AND MITIGATING MEASURES: The owner of the property has indicat that he believes the proposed use enjoys nonconforming status; however, Staff has researched all available records and find no basis for this claim. In 1973, when the present Zoning ordinance was adopted, the zoning of the subject parcel was changed from C-2 to B-2 because the primary use, at that time, was that of a gasoline station rather than motor vehicle sales and/or repair. If sales and/or repair had been the primary use, th zoning would have been changed to B-3 rather than B-2. Since 1973, all indications are that the gasoline station has continued to be the primary use. Gross receipts since 1973 indicated that the primary use and economic function was that of gasoline sales rather than motor vehicle sales or repair. Therefore, Staff finds no evidence which would permit establishment of a motorcycle repair shop based on a nonconforming status Staff notes that Milhorn Subdivision, which is zoned Residential (R-7), lies to the west of this request. Staff visited the site and finds that the existing commercial building on this property is being used for two purposes. The northeast corner of the building is being used for gasoline sales and minor automotive repair while the remainder of the building is being used for the display and repair of motorcycles. Staff found that motorcycles are being displayed along the right-of-way at the intersection of Jefferson Davis Highway and Milhorn Street. In addition, a fenced in motorcycle diplay area has been added to the south end of the existing building. This fenced area extends to the right-of- way line and adds to the conjestion along Milhorn Street. Staff notes that Section 18-5 (4) of the County Zoning ordinance provides that out- side display of merchandise for sale is permitted only when such merchan- dise observes the front and corner side yard setbacks of the district in which it is located. In view of this, outside displays of merchandise .on this property must be setback from the right-of-way line at least 50 feet from Jefferson Davis Highway and 30 feet from Milhorn Street. This is requirement in both the B-2 and B-3 zones. This fenced area, which extends to the right-of-way line, adds to the conjestion along Milhorn Street. The Applicant could apply for a -Variance to permit the outside display of merchandise up to the right-of-way line; however, Staff believes that there is no justification on which the Board of Zoning Appeals could approve such a request. Staff also observed that three unlicensed, partly disassembled, automo- biles and one partly dissassembled truck are located in the north side yard of this lot. Staff notes that the ground directly behind the existing building rises sharply and cannot be used for either the display of motorcycles, or the storage of motorcycles and/or automobiles which are waiting repair. IN view of the topography of this property and zoning requirements, it appears that the best use of this property would be to locate an area in 1) the north side yard area of this lot for the parking and/or storage of motorcycles and automobiles waiting repair;' see enclosure 2. While Staff was visiting the property, there was a predominance of noise and dust in the front yard and along Milhorn Street from motorcycles being tested. We believe that this noise and dust, in a very conjested area, will be a nuisance to the adjacent property owners and to the area in general. Staff believes that the overall appearance of this property is a detri- ment to the adjacent properties and the area in general. Jefferson Davis Highway is a major arterial and the present use of this property, and the way it is being maintained downgrade the appearance of the area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: DENIAL OF THIS REQUEST IS RECOMMENDED. However, if the Commission can find justification to recommend approval of General Business (B-3) rezoning, we suggest that it be subject to the condition that a buffer strip be e tablished in the north side yard of this property. This buffer shall be designed, constructed and used as an area for display and parking of automobiles, motorcycles and trucks which are for sale. The buffer strip for the display of motorcycles for sale shall be setback at least 50 feet from Jefferson Davis Highway. The parking area for motorcycles and automobiles waiting repair, and/or uneconomically repairable vehicles, shall be setback at least 100 feet from Jefferson Davis and shall be effectively screened from all public streets or roads by evergreen shrubs and trees, and shall be surrounded by a solid ornamental fence or wall not less than 8 feet high and shall be properly maintained. CASE HIS'T'ORY AND PAST BOARD AND COMMISSION ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST. C.P.C. 3 15 77: Recommended approval of General Business (B-3) zoning subject to tEe- condition that a buffer strip be established in the north side yard of this property. This buffer shall be designed and constructed and used as an area for display and parking of automobiles, motorcycles and trucks which are for sale. The buffer strip for the display of motorocycles for sale shall be setback at least 50 feet from Jefferson Davis Highway. The parking area for motorcycles and automobiles waiting repair, and uneconomically repairable vehicles shall be setback at least 100 feet from Jefferson Davis Highway and shall be effectively screened from all public streets or roads by evergreen shrubs and trees, and shall be surrounded by a solid ornamental fence or wall not less than 8 feet high and shall be properly maintained. 3. = et w w B• r i r r"litlil w w -A II® 1` Y, A AY 9 - . r a � - w _ - x s - w - • M + �I r i _ A10ate++►`t IN Pl, i�• •. 2 OL_ — 12�y • ► _ w C PSNH of \ w w w / r w w w w s ■ � w w w ■ w ■ w w ; ■ 0 - - 'Au4saul, 11 PPPPPP S - r '/► O Oq ; f11Pt11 =1. � 1 0 U_ 2 0 � o � ' o 0 i SD's m �x Gy«.E RUPA14 ocrf• _ _ .Ss/oP It NO�CT 1 °'' as AAY 114A AX �C7t t � ExisT�nl� i��peor�M��s EXi b r/ doo-% I I It 11 1-4, '1 -- Apri17, 1977 - B.S. CASE NUMBER: NUMBER: 77SO46 APPLICANT: JOHN E. DODSON REQUEST AND PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7). The Applicant intends to subdivide this property for single family residential use and create 174 lots; see attached plat. GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Dale Magisterial District, this parcel fronts along the east line of Beulah Road and Salem Church Road and is located opposite the intersection of the aforementioned roads. Tax Map 66-11 (1) Parcel 1 (Sheet 22). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): This parcel contains 86 acres, is zoned Agricultural (A) and is presently vacant. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property to the north is zoned Agricultural (A), property to the east and southeast is zoned Residential (R-7), property to the southwest is zoned Agricultural (A) and property to the west is zoned Residential (R-7). Property to the north, northeast is either vacant or occupied by single family dwellings; to the east is being developed as Kimberly Acres; to the south, southwest is vacant or occupied by single family dwellings and to the west is presently being developed as.Orchard Hill Subdivision. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENT: Public water and sewer is available for development of this parcel. In this case, the Applicant plans to subdivide this property and create 174 lots. The Utilities Department currently reports that an average single family residence uses 240 gallons of water per day; therefore, approximately 41,760 gallons per day would be utilized by this development. These per unit flows are not line design flows, because peak flow plus fire service flow must be considered for design purposes. There is an avail- able water treatment capacity of 29 million gallons per day at Appomattox and Falling Creek serving this area with 4 million gallons of water per day now being used. There is a 6 inch water line at Lair Drive, south of this property, which will serve this parcel. Also, water will be available on Salem Church Road when Orchard Hill Subdivision is completed. The County Engineer calculates per capita sewage at 100 gallons per day for design purposes. Based on an average of 3.5 persons per single family dwelling unit, approximately 609 gallons per day of sewage effluent would be generated for treatment by the proposed subdivision. These sewage treatment figures are greater than the water used because of infiltration and inflow. The Proctors Creek Sewer Trunk which will serve this project and will connect to the Proctors Interim Treatment Plan which has a capa- city of 1 million gallons per day. Presently, the sewer line between Route 1 and Belwood Manor lagoon is a 12 inch line and needs to be re- placed. Also, a plant is under construction which will handle approximate. 4 million gallons per day. 1. over The soils on this parcel are mostly sandy loam to moderate chance for erosion. The parcel is posed use except for the low and steep areas; r and have only a slight well suited for the pro - see soil map. In general, the soils on higher elevations are well suited for roadways and foundations. Low areas are poorly suited for foundations. Steep slopes have a servere erosion hazard. Road ditch bottoms must be lined in steep areas. This parcel lies in Kingsland Creek drainage pattern. The parcel has poor drainage in some areas and drainage and erosion problems are anticipated. A site plan and erosion control plan must be approved prior to clearing any ground. Off-site easements for sewer and drainage will be required. It is anticipated that utility and drainage easements will be required. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Based on the 1977 average of 0.90 public school students per single family dwelling, approximately 157 pupils would be generated by this development. This subdivision is now within the Beulah.Elementary, Falling Creek Junior High and Meadowbrook High School attendance zones. The purposed subdivision will be served by Dale Fire Station, Companv #11, which is a volunteer unit. This fire station is located 3.5 miles from the proposed project. At preset, this fire station's capability to provide fire service is limited due to an inadequate water supply in this area. This subdivision should not be fully developed until the water line from Pear Orchard Creek Subdivision is extended to the east and then south along Salem Church Road. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: Single family development under the R-7 classi- fication and the creation of approximately 174 lots would result in the generation of approximately 1,705 average daily traffic based on an estimate of 9.8 trips per single family residence. These vehicular movements would be distributed over Beulah Road, Hopkins Road and Salem Church Road, which are adjacent to this property, or are the primary roads leading to major arterials. Beulah and Salem Chruch Roads, in the area of the request, are both quite narrow with many curves. There is very poor alignment at the intersection of Hopkins and Beulah Roads and again at Beulah and Salem Church Roads. There are planned improvements for Salem Chruch Road, Hopkins Road and Beulah Road in the near future. This subdivision will create 1,705 average daily trips along the primary roads adjacent to or near this project. These roads are presently heavily traveled roads. It would appear that the realignment of inter- sections and the widening of roads should be given consideration prior to full development of this subdivision because of the additional traffic it will generate. It should be noted that as indicated in the Highway Department's 1975/1976 Primary and Secondary Road Traffic Counts, the following average daily traffic on area roads have been experienced: (see attached traffic map) a. Beulah Road from Salem Church to Hopkins - 2,100 ADT; b. Beulah Road from Kingsland to Salem Church Road - 1,428 ADT; c. Beulah Road from Hopkins Road to Fuqua Road - 3,184 ADT; d. Salem Church Road from Beulah Road to Lair Road - 580 ADT; e. Hopkins Road to Panola Road to Beulah Road - 5,972 ADT. 2. GENERAL PLAN: This parcel lies in an area designated for single family residential use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant, who is the owner of this property, requests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7). The Applicant intends to subdivide this property for single family residential use. On February 22, 1977, the Planning Commission gave tentative approval for Brent Wood Subdivision. This subdivision will be developed on an 84 acre parcel of land and will consist of approximately 174 lots. The lots will range in size from a minimum of 10,200 square feet to a maximum of 3.2 acres. The average lot being approximately 18,700 square feet in area. The developer plans to use public water and sewer, and roadside drainage ditches. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: Generally speaking, what residential rezoning has occured in this area has been Residential (R-7). Therefore, the subdivision of this property under the R-7 classification should be acceptable utilizing public water and sewer. However, Staff believes that the full development of this subdivision should not be permitted until the realignment of the Beulah Road, Salem Church Road intersection and the Beulah Road, Hopkins Road intersection have been completed,and the realignment and widening of these roads is accomplished. Staff notes that Beulah Road,in the area of this request, is presently a 30 foot wide right-of-way. Staff recognizes the Applicant plans to dedicate a 10 foot widening strip along the east line of Beulah Road for the future widening of this road. However, a future widening strip will not increase the present paved surface or improve the alignment of this existing road. The same problem is visible on Salem Church Road in the area of the request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of this request. CASE HISTORY AND PAST BOA OMMISSION ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST. C.P.C. 3 1577: Recommended approval of this request. 3. mm M,= i :� - �,� ��=rooms•, . =r' Nor re ,SG9c.c� le - e I� 7750f<0 -Z UN Ur C : r• ` ' r i r• ■ ti UN Ur C : r• ` ' r i w ■ ti t � r, -Jr 1 r r - �, U Q ' b S � -L ; c � � r �. r,• �= X11 � � cv Z fS Q- I' r ° rl _[ 1 1 '1 0 o r� ��• in t �,_.P'� o �- -mac c C, � � tD r - 10 Fri P i -•tel. � + •' � O :O . I� I ■ ,r s. ' r i w ■ ti t � Q r r Q i I ILI n U� n-,'�l� 0 7-c- CD I� I O v 'I ,r s. ' r i I • • O v 'I ,r o ' ti t � Q + Q i ILI n U� n-,'�l� 0 7-c- CD ° r -C. 1 1 '1 0 o r� ��• in t �,_.P'� o �- -mac c C, � � tD - rr, A 10 Fri ` ( April 27; 1977 - B.S. j.C..�.:C..}- CASE NUMBER: 77SO48 APPLICANT: JULIAN C. METTS, JR. REQUEST AND PROPOSED USE: A Conditional Use to permit the construction of a professional office building. GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Midlothian Magisterial District, this parcel fronts along the south line of Forest Hill Avenue and is located approximately 100 feet west of the Chesterfield County/ City of Richmond line. Tax Map 10-7 (5) Stratford Hills, Section T, Blk A, Lot 1 (Sheet 3). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): This lot contains approximatley 1.2 acres, is zoned Agricultural A) and is presently vacant. Staff notes that a Virginia Electric and Power Company easement (75 feet in width) and a Commonwealth Natural Gas Company easement (50 feet in width) occupies a large portion of the parcel. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: All adjacent property is zoned Residential R-15 and is either vacant or occupied by single family dwellings. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Public water and sewer are available to serve this site,and would be required in the development of this parcel. Public water line is located on Forest Hill Avenue across the road from this property. There is an available water treatment capacity of 10 million gallons per day from Swift Creek serving this area with 6 to 7 million gallons per day now being used. This lot lies in the Powhite Sewer Drainge Area. Sewer is available to serve this parcel and is located at the end of Tuscora Road. The sewer trunk which will serve this project will connect to the Richmond Treat- ment Plant. The extension of the sewer will cost $5,000 to $6,000 and must be borne by the Applicant. The soil on this lot is sandy loam, gently sloping and has only a slight chance for erosion. In general, the soil is well drained; gravelly; well suited for foundations and roadways, conditionally suited for septic tank and drainfields. This lot lies in the Lake Page Drainage Pattern. There is a possibility of drainage and erosion problems based on the topography of the property; therefore, prior to any clearing or construction an erosion control plan must be submitted and approved. Off-site easements will be required for sewer and drainage. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Development of the proposed use should have no detriment impact on either existing or'future area public .facilities. TRANSPORTATION AND TRA'F'FIC: Staff notes that Forest Hill Avenue is well maintained in the area of the request parcel; however, traffic is very heavy. It is anticipated that Forest Hill Avenue will be widened to a 4 -lane road sometime in the near future. This request lies in Traffic 1, over Zone 199. It should be noted that as indicated in the Highway Department 1975 Primary Road Traffic Count, the average daily traffic on Forest Hill Avenue, in the area of the request, is 11,855 ADT. GENERAL PLAN: This lot lies in an area designated for single family residential use. REQUEST ANSLYSIS: The Applicant requests a Conditional Use to permit the construction of a professional office building on this parcel. He states that the project will be designed and constructed in accordance with the site plan submitted with the application and dated 2/12/68; see enclosure. Staff notes that on June 25, 1975, the Board of Supervisors approved the rezoning of this property from Residential (R-15) to Agricultural (A) and also granted a Conditional Use for construction of an office building This permit expired eighteen months later. Therefore, Mr. Metts, who is part owner and developer of this property, with Mr. Wilson Cory and Henry Addington, is requesting a Conditional use to construct the sam� office building which was approved in 1975. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: Of prominence in the consideraton of this request, is existing area land use. The majority of the property fronting along Forest Hill Avenue, as well as adjacent property to the southeast and southwest, have been developed for single family institu- tional (Churches and schools) use. Many parcels fronting Forest Hill Avenue have not be residentially developed because of the impact vehicula traffic has made on the area. By the same token, semi-public and commerc uses have found that locating on Forest Hill Avenue has an advantage for their various businesses. The subject request represents a use which can take a good advantage of the traffic situation on Forest Hill Avenue, while at the same time, offering suitable compatibility for adjacent and area residential development. It is an irtrical part of the application that the structur to be erected and plan of -the site have an appearance acceptable to and compatible with adjacent and area residential development. In certain respects, the appearance of the proposed structure is architecturally superior to and more pleasing that some existing structures in the area. By the nature of operating a professional office building, it is expected that no detrimental impact should be experienced by adjacent and area residents. Property values should not be adversely effected, nor will any precedent be set (nor should it be inferred) for strip commercial zoning along Forest Hill Avenue. It should be noted that the developers of this parcel, represent the same development interest that constructed Stratford Hills Professional Building adjacent to Stratford Hills Shoppin, Center on Forest Hill Avenue. In its review of this request, Planning Staff has ascertained that there is one apparent problem to developing the parcel as proposed. This problem involves erosion and drainage control. A preliminary investigati indicates that there will be a need for special engineering consideration when the site is filled and graded. It will be necessary to protect adjacent properties from the detrimental effects or excessive water run-off. It is not believed that this problem is insurmountable; however care will have to be taken in engineering and preparing the site for construction. 2. In the Planning Commission's original consideration of this request (case #752040) the Commission expressed concern relative to deed restric- tions which might prohibit development of the parcel as intended. How- ever, further research by Staff revealed that, in fact, the subject restrictions do not apply to the section of the Subdivison encompassing the request parcel. Planning Staff has noted that the 44 parking spaces shown on the plan are sufficient to accomodate an 8,000 square foot medical and dental office building. (See section 24.1-2, para.D, subpara. 3) 'STAFF RECOMMENDATION: After viewing the site and studying the application, proposed site plan and renderings submitted therewith, and after giving consideration to the impact of this land use proposal, Staff would re- commend approval of the request, subject to the imposition of the follow- ing conditions: 1. The preliminary site plan prepared by Barton, Corso and Associates, Ltd., showing a revision date of 8-15-75 (job number 7310-26) which was submitted with the application, shall be considered the plan of development for the parcel in question. The following conditions notwithstanding,off setbacks, landscaped areas and positioning of driveways and parking areas shall be provided as shown on the plan. 2. The proposed building shall be designed as indicated and shall utiliz building materials as depected in the photograph of renderings sub- mitted as part of the application. 3. A minimum of not less than 44 parking spaces shall be provided. 4. All parking spaces and driveways shall be paved. Curb and gutter sha be utilized on the entrance driveway and wherever else is necessary and determined necessary to effect adequate drainage and erosion control. 5. The portion of the driveway southeast of the entrance shall be locate at least 15 feet south of the right-of-way line and made to be one way out. 6. A landscaping and planting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Division of Development Review as part of final site plan approva Such a plan shall sow the location and type of trees, shrubs and ground cover to be utilized in the development of this parcel. Plant- ing along the west and southwest portions of the property shall be evergreen and shall be of an initial height and density to sufficient. buffer the parking area from view of adjacent properties. 7. Drainage and erosion control measures shall be instituted as deemed necessary by the Division of Environmental Engineering. A drainage, and erosion control plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Engineering Division prior to any issuance of any building permits an6 prior to any clearing or grading of the parcel. 8. Only one sign shall be permitted. This sign shall neither be illumi- nated nor shall it be luminous and shall have an appearance in keepin( with the architectural design of the structure located on the parcel. In all other respects, the size and location and type of sign shall be governed by the minimum requirement applicable in the Office Busi- ness (0) zone. 3. 9. The above noted conditions, nothwithstanding all other requirements as applicable in the Office Business (0) zone shall apply to development of the subject parcel. CASE HISTORY AND PAST BOARD AND COMMISSION ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST. C.P.C. 3 15 77: Recommended approval of a Conditional Use to construct a professional office building on this parcel subject to the following conditions: 1. The preliminary site plan prepared by Barton, Corso and Associates, Ltd., showing a revision date of 8/15/75 (job #7310-26) which was submitted with the Application, shall be considered the plan of development for the parcel in question. The following conditions notwithstanding, off setbacks, landscaped areas and positioning of driveways and parking areas shall be provided as shown on the plan. 2. The proposed building shall be designed as indicated and shall utilize building materials as depected in the photograph of render- ings submitted as part of the application. 3. A minimum of not less than 44 parking spaces shall be provided. 4. All parking spaces and driveways shall be paved. Curb and gutter shall be utilized on the entrance driveway and wherever else is necessary and determined necessary to effect adequate drainage and erosion control. 5. The portion of the driveway southeast of the entrance shall be located at least 15 feet south of the right-of-way line and made to be one way out. 6. A landscaping and planting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Division of Development Review as part of the final site plan approval. Such a plan shall show the location and type of trees, shrubs and ground cover to be utilized in the development of this parcel. Planting along the west and southwest portions of the property shall be evergreen and shall be of an initial height and density to sufficiently buffer the parking area from view of adjacent properties. 7. Drainage and erosion control measures shall be instituted as deemed necessary by the Division of Engineering. A drainage and erosion control plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Engineering Division prior to any issuance of any building permits and prior to any clearing or grading of the parcel. B. Only one sign shall be permitted. This sign shall neither be illumi- nated nor shall it be luminous and shall have an appearance in keepin< with the architectural design of the structure located on the parcel. In all other respects, the size and location and type of sign shall be governed by the minimum requirement applicable in the Office Business (0) zone. 4. g. A solid ornamental wood fence or masonry wall, not less than 6 feet high, shall be installed and properly maintained for the entire length of the south or rear property line. 10. The above noted conditions, notwithstanding all other requirements as applicable in the Office Business (0) zone shall apply to develop- ment of the subject parcel. 5. N�4N,N�? �AM 7RD. D -7" ct • (23 4f u I co lo SURRUNDI F o w 1 -DR HILL HILL —A CT e. Pi r E h rj C 77:564.6 o66' 4.4J69 111AC&M— Yµ '' \ Its% sk ji �,i io 22 16 14 \ / 12 t P 1 1 t n a ft Ip A 3.A o 004 q • , , -• p S 1 ` 2-I 3.1 324 2-A Zo ? 7\ ' pl. 6-81 eat s.A 1 ah Ott gyt• t \\ \ \ ' t0it iti• ] -i ..7. 11,94, its. 104/1/41 23 �\ 2zg �' \ 1/li•1 20 Z 24 to �1 \ 94 14 r s Q S 77504e-02 CO)N� DtR{JT S�CT(ON 10-7 April 274977 - B.S. CASE NUMBER: 775050 APPLICANT: E. M. CIEJEK, INC. _REQUEST & PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Community Business (B-2) to General Business (B-3). The applicant plans to construct a commercial dog kennel on this property. GENERAL LOCATION & TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Clover Hill Magisterial District, this parcel fronts along the south line of Midlothian Turnpike and is located east of its intersection with Research Road. Tax Map 17-9 (3) 60 West Commercial Plaza, Sec B, Blk F, Lot 16 (Sheet 3). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): This parcel contains 2.6 acres, is zoned Community Business (B-2) and is presently vacant. Property to the north, south is zoned Community Business (B-2) while property to the east and west is zoned General Business (B-3). Adjacent property is occupied by commercial buildings or remains vacant. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE & EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Public water and sewer is available to this site and would be required in the proposed development. Public water is on site. The property is served by a 12 inch water line which is located on Research Road. There is an available water capacity of 10 million gallons per day from Swift Creek serving this area with 6 to 7 million gallons per day now being used. This lot lies in the Pocoshock Creek Sewer Drainage Area. The closest trunk line is located approximately 700 feet east of this property in South 60 Commercial Park. The soils on this property are sandy loam and high terrace; level to gently sloping with only a slight chance of erosion; poorly drained with clay subsoils. They have a seasonal water table at 18 inches depth or less. In general this lot is poorly suited for the proposed use. This lot lies in the Falling Creek Drainage Pattern and presentl,. has very poor drainage. Prior to clearing or construction, a plan for erosion control must be approved. Off-site easements will be required for sewer and drainage. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Development of -the proposed use should have no detrimental impact on either existing or future public facilities. TRANSPORTATION & TRAFFIC: Midlothian Turnpike in the area of the request is in good condition and is the heavily travelled major arterial. This request lies in Traffic Zone 202. It should be noted that as indicate,: in the highway Department's 1975 Primary Road Traffic Counts, the average daily traffic on Midlothian Turnpike in the area of the request was 16,280 ADT. GENERAL PLAN: This lot lies in an area designed for commercial use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: In this case the applicant,.who is the owner of the property, requests the rezoning from Community Business (B-2) to General.Business (B-3). The applicant intends to build a commercial kennel for Holiday Barn Inc. on this lot; see enclosure 1. ALTERNATIVES & MITIGATING MEASURES: Since the parcel in question lies within an area that will be developed for higher intensity commercial uses, the rezoning requested is neither inappropriate nor should it prove an objection to development along this section of the Route 60 corridor. The proposed use for construction and operation of a commercial dog kennel is first permitted in the General Business (B-3) zone. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST IS RECOMMENDED. CASE HISTORY AND PAST BOARD AND COMMISSION ACTION ' FOR THIS REQUEST. C.P.C. 4 27 •77: Approval of the request - is recommended. i c • � • r y . r r r • 1 r . r 1 F e R-7 e HHF�,Ia..�,. _ 11 T 1111► / l 1 _~�, •t �4 4 ` � /111111�11� t 04T9l1111t1111f111 � , B2. li 4 t/ t I 1, 7 2 • •� ♦ Ilttlllt/1////lt/�Illtt 1111111tIflttltlltl 1111(1 �:+oo r R O __� a111i11 ' ♦ 1 /NITS r tllllitttlitllttill � I -}:••'•---.• � ' i n — � + FOR ,4PP.z �///✓ FLS. S OFS�BO/!�/S/Or1S FC.ti' /,�ECU.QD4�/OiY =,P.!'S ///Cir�'STc".�r/EGJ �; !/ �i'/�;!!f/!•'1E6EE�,/CO,'/,oL/EOLi%/i. S70/YES ,SHOT✓�'✓ h'Er=E :'/4 L 6t S Di' .;'OC.l /,, 7d wry G 141W 4' FLEE . • Y - ?�EDc'D/CQTED TO - • - • • 'F�G'l/S'I.J,PEE,,G1Eil'lS - • D.4T/Ov T//,F . 401Of'�., PrPEss STEE 10 h'FS'/DEiJ/T.OrYO .3,9, js- -� P • / c 1 V Tf/E rE _—,, /972 �c� � , • -•-pro Sze=o�:� 'C/C' 44a X7,..4. +• •� -�!•, • ;• �• . : ' , � • . .. '�� '. . 1 e._- a LLA or e._- a- r._- M M On motion of , seconded by 3 be it resolved that the Treasurer be and he hereby is authorized to negotiate a short-term loan not to exceed $2,000,000 in accordance with Section 15.1-545 and 15.1-546 of the Code of Virginia. In, n AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1975, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING §§20-9.1, 20-18.1, 20-21.1, AND §520-33 THROUGH 2O-55, AMEND- ING §§20-4, AND 20-5, 20-13, 20-15, 20-19, AND 20-26 AND REPEALING §§20-9, 20-20 AND 20-21 RELATING GEN- EDAL WASTE IASLLY TO SECHARGES, INDUSTRIALER AND TCOSER TARECOVERY UAND IPROVIDING D FOR A PENALTY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of.-Ches-terfield County: (1) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1975, as amended, is amended by adding §§20-9.1, 20-18.1, 20-21.1 and 20-33 through 20-55 as follows: Section 20-9.1. Water Rates. In all cases not covered by contract made by the Board of Supervisors prior to the effective date of this ordinance, in- cluding the Ettrick Sanitary District, the monthly rate for consumption of water to be paid by the owner shall include a minimum monthly service charge based on the meter size serving the premise and a volume charge, in accordance with the follow- ing schedule: a, Minimum Service Charge Per Premise: Water Meter Size (Inches) Monthly Amount b. Volume Charge: First 400 cu. ft . .................no charge Next 9,600 cu. ft . ................70G per 100 cu. ft. Next 20,000 cu. ft . ...............55,,, per 100 cu. ft. Next 200,000 cu. ft . ..............50G per 100 cu. ft. Next 200,000 cu. ft . ..............40(,, per 100 cu. ft. Next 300,000 cu. ft . ..............30G per 100 cu. ft. All in excess of 730,000 cu. ft. ..28� per 100 cu. ft. C. Multiple Unit Residence Charge: The minimum monthly charge shall be applicable to all apartments, condominiums, duplexes, mobile homes and other premises wherein more than one living unit is served by one service connection. The service charge shall be the service charge for a 5/8 -inch or 3/4 -inch meter plus $4.00 per living unit for each unit in excess of one. The amount of water included in the service charge shall be determined by multiplying the total number of living units by 400 cubic feet. The volume charge shall be the same as for all other classes of customers for all water in excess of the product of the total number of units times 400 cubic feet. P 5/8 or 3/4 ...........................$ 4.00 7.50 1.. ....... ......... ............ 1-1/4 .................................. 1-1/2 .................................. 11.00 14.00 14.00 2 ...................................... 37.00 3 . .... ............................... '62.00 4 ...................................... 125.00 225.00 8......• ............................... 350.00 10 ...................................... 500.00 12 ................. ................... b. Volume Charge: First 400 cu. ft . .................no charge Next 9,600 cu. ft . ................70G per 100 cu. ft. Next 20,000 cu. ft . ...............55,,, per 100 cu. ft. Next 200,000 cu. ft . ..............50G per 100 cu. ft. Next 200,000 cu. ft . ..............40(,, per 100 cu. ft. Next 300,000 cu. ft . ..............30G per 100 cu. ft. All in excess of 730,000 cu. ft. ..28� per 100 cu. ft. C. Multiple Unit Residence Charge: The minimum monthly charge shall be applicable to all apartments, condominiums, duplexes, mobile homes and other premises wherein more than one living unit is served by one service connection. The service charge shall be the service charge for a 5/8 -inch or 3/4 -inch meter plus $4.00 per living unit for each unit in excess of one. The amount of water included in the service charge shall be determined by multiplying the total number of living units by 400 cubic feet. The volume charge shall be the same as for all other classes of customers for all water in excess of the product of the total number of units times 400 cubic feet. P i Section 20-18.1. Use of water system upon certain conditions. If the director of utilities determines that a proposed industrial, commercial or domestic use of the County Ys- tem is reasonably likely to cause damage or constitute a hazard to the water system, the director of utilities may impose reaso able conditions upon the applicant asking for water service regarding type and manner of use which are designed to minimize danger to the County water system. Section 20-21.1. Same - Sewer user charge service rates. All owners of premises who have contracted to connect, who have connected or who shall hereafter connect the sewerage facilities of such premises to the County sewerage system shall be required to pay a monthly user charge composed of a meter size minimum service charge and a volume charge to recover the operation and maintenance expenses of the sewer system in accordance with the following schedule: a. Service Charge Per Premise (Minimum Charge): Mater Meter Size (Inches) Monthly Amo un t b. In those instances where residential premises are con- nected to the sewer system but not to the County water system, the user shall pay $10.00 per month. C. In those instances where a residential unit for which a connection fee has been paid, but sewer has not been connec- ted, the user shall pay $5.40 per :;;onth . d. The Multiple -unit Residence Charge shall be applicable to all apartments, condominiums, duplexes, mobile homes and other premises wherein more than one living unit is served by one service connection. The service charge will be the service charge for a 5/8 -inch or 3/4 -inch meter plus $5.00 per living unit for each unit in excess of one in addition to the appli- cable volume charge. e. In addition, a volume charge as measured by the water meter per 100 cubic feet shall be made in accordance with the following schedule: • II Residential .....................$0.57 per 100 cu. ft. Commercial. .$0.57 per 100 cu. ft. Industrial......................$0.57 per 100 cu. ft. f. Where applicable, those users of the County sewer sys- tem shall, in addition to the basic user charge provided for herein, pay a surcharge covering the cost of treating excessive strength waste or pollutants as provided in Article III herein- after, and a surcharge covering the industrial share of capital improvements for wastewater treatment as defined by applicable federal regulations and as provided in Article IV hereafter. 5/8 or 3/4 .......................$ 5.00 11.00 1 .................................. 1-1/4 ................. 1-1/2 ..............................22.00 ............17.00 30.00 2 .................................. 65.00 3 .................................. 100.00 4 .................................. 200.00 ........... 6 ..................... 375.00 8 .................................. 500.00 10 .................................. 650.00 12 ..................... ........... b. In those instances where residential premises are con- nected to the sewer system but not to the County water system, the user shall pay $10.00 per month. C. In those instances where a residential unit for which a connection fee has been paid, but sewer has not been connec- ted, the user shall pay $5.40 per :;;onth . d. The Multiple -unit Residence Charge shall be applicable to all apartments, condominiums, duplexes, mobile homes and other premises wherein more than one living unit is served by one service connection. The service charge will be the service charge for a 5/8 -inch or 3/4 -inch meter plus $5.00 per living unit for each unit in excess of one in addition to the appli- cable volume charge. e. In addition, a volume charge as measured by the water meter per 100 cubic feet shall be made in accordance with the following schedule: • II Residential .....................$0.57 per 100 cu. ft. Commercial. .$0.57 per 100 cu. ft. Industrial......................$0.57 per 100 cu. ft. f. Where applicable, those users of the County sewer sys- tem shall, in addition to the basic user charge provided for herein, pay a surcharge covering the cost of treating excessive strength waste or pollutants as provided in Article III herein- after, and a surcharge covering the industrial share of capital improvements for wastewater treatment as defined by applicable federal regulations and as provided in Article IV hereafter. g. The owner of the premises where the sewerage facilities of the county have been contracted for shall be liable for the payment of all charges made for service rendered to such pre- mises until such owner makes application for discontinuance of service on forms furnished by the county. I.f water and/or sewer charges are not paid for a period of thirty days, then the county may discontinue water and sewer service. ARTICLE III INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE Section 20-33. Definitions. As used. in this Article the following words and phrases shall have the meanings hereinafter ascribed to them, unless otherwise clearly required by the context: a. "B.O.D." or "biochemical oxygen demand" shall mean the quantity of oxygen utilized in the biochemical oxidation of organic matter, under standard laboratory procedure, in five days at 20°C, expressed in parts per million. The laboratory determination shall be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in "Standard Methods". b. "Domestic sewage" shall mean waterborne wastes normally discharging from the sanitary conveniences of dwellings (includ- ing apartment houses and hotels), office buildings, factories and institutions, free from ground water, storm surface water and industrial wastes. ° C. "Garbage" shall mean solid wastes and residue from the preparation, cooking and dispensing of food, and from the han- dling, storage and sale of food products and produce. d. "Industrial wastes" shall mean all waterborne solids, liquids or gaseous wastes resulting from,any industrial manu- facturing, trade, business or food processing operation or pro- cess, or from. the development of any natural resource, or any mixture of these with water or domestic sewage as distinct from normal domestic sewage. e. "Natural outlet" shall mean any outlet into a water- course, pond, ditch, lake or other body of surface or ground- water. f. "Normal domestic sewage shall mean sewage in which concentration of suspended materials and five day 20°C B.O.D. is established at 240 parts per million each, by weight, on the basis of the normal daily contribution of'twenty hundredths pounds per capita, per 100 gallons. g. "Parts per million" shall mean a weight to weight ratic the parts per million value multiplied by the factor 8.345 shall be equivalent to pounds per million gallons of water. h. "Persons" shall mean any and all persons, natural or artificial, including any individual, firm, company, industry, municipal or private corporation. i. "pH" shall mean the logarithm (base 10) of the recip- rocal of the hydrogen ion concentration of a solution. It shall be determined by one of the procedures outlined in "Stan- dard Methods". j. "Point of discharge" shall mean ithe point at which waste is discharged to the Chesterfield County sewers. I may. k. "Properly shredded garbage" shall mean wastes from the preparation, cooking and dispensing of food which have been shredded to such a degree that all particles will be carried under the flow conditions normally prevailing in the county san- itary sewer system, with no particle greater than one-half inch in any dimension. 1. "Sanitary sewer" shall"mean a sewer which carries sew- age and to which storm, surface,and ground waters are not inten- tionally admitted. M. "Sewage" shall mean a combination -of water-e&rried waste from residential, commercial, institutional and industrial establishments, together with such ground, surface and storm waters as may be present. n. "Sewage treatment plant" shall mean any arrangement of devices and structures used for treating sewage. .1 ,1 o. "Sewer" shall mean a pipe or conduit used to collect and carry away sewage or storm water run off from the generat- ing source to sewage treatment plants or;receiving streams. p. "Sewerage" shall mean the system of sewers and appur- tenances for the collection, transportation, pumping and treat- ment of sewage and industrial wastes. q. "Sewer service charge " shall mean the charge levied by X20-21.1 on all users of the county sanitary sewerage system, whose wastes do not exceed in strength the concentration values established as representative of.normal domestic sewage. r. "Slug" shall mean any discharge of water, sewage or industrial waste which, in concentration of any given constit- uent, or in quantity of flow, exceeds for any period of dura- tion longer than fifteen minutes more than five times the aver- age twenty-four hour concentration or flows during the normal operation. S. "Standard Methods" shall mean the examination and analytical procedures set forth in the latest edition, at the time of analysis, of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater as prepared, approved and published jointl, by the American Public Health Association, the American Water Works Association and the Water Pollution Control Federation. t. "Storm sewer or storm drain" shall mean a sewer which carries storm and surface waters'.but excludes sewage and -indus- trial wastes. U. "Storm water run-off" shall mean that portion of the rainfall that is drained into ,the storm sewers. V. "Suspended solids" shall mean solids that either float on the surface of, or are in suspension in, water, sewage, or other liquids, and which are removable by laboratory filtering. Quantitative determination of suspended solids shall be made in accordance with procedures set forth -in "Standard Methods". Section 20-34 Restriction on usage of sanitary sewers. The discharge of industrial waste into the County sanitary sewer system shall be permitted`provided that: a. Sewer capacity is available on a basis compatible with the best overall use of the sewer. M b. The waste to be discharged is amenable to treatment by the processes employed in the waste treatment plants of Chester_ field County. C. The waste to be discharged will not cause damage or constitute a hazard to the sanitary sewer system or waste treat- ment facilities and will not constitute a hazard to humans or animals, nor be capable of creating a public nuisance. d. The concentration of substances, compounds, and ele- ments in the waste being discharged or proposed to be discharged do not exceed the limits established by this article: e. All other requirements of this article are complied with, including the obtaining of a permit as required by 520-40. Section 20-35. Substances not to be deposited in sanit system. sewer No person shall cause to be discharged or deposited any of the following into any sewer forming a part of the sanitary sewer system of the county: a. Any waste, liquid, or vapor having a temperature higher than 150 degrees Farenheit. b. Any water or waste containing more than 100 parts per million of fat, oil, or grease, exclusive of soap. C. Any gasoline, benzene, naphtha or other hydrocarbon solvents or oils, or other flammable or explosive liquids, solids or gases. d. Any solid waste in excess of concentrations present in normal domestic sewage that has not been properly shredded. e. Any ashes, cinders, sand, mud, straw, shavings, lint, glass, rags, metals, feathers, tar, plastics, wood, paunch manure, insulation materials, fibers of any kind, stock or poul try feeds, processed grains, viscera or other fleshy particles 1 from processing or packing plants, or any other solid or viscous, substance in excess of concentrations present in normal domestic sewage capable of causing obstruction to flow in sewers or interference with proper operation of waste treatment facilities. f. Any waters or wastes having a stabilized pH lower than 6.0 or higher than 9.0 or having properties capable of either causing damage to structures and equipment of the sanitary sewer system or sewage treatment plants or creating a hazard to per- sonnel engaged in operation and maintenance of such facilities. 9. Any waters or wastes having objectionable color which is not removable by the existing waste treatment plant processes. h. Any waters or wastes containing contaminants of such character or in such quantity as will not be amenable to the waste treatment processes, or will injure or interfere with the waste treatment processes, or will constitute a hazard to humans or animals, or will create a hazard in the stream or water- course receiving the effluent from the waste treatment plant. i. Any noxious or malodorous gas, or any substance which, when introduced into a reducing environment, could cause the evolution of a noxious or malodorous gas. j. Any storm water, surface water, ground water, roof run= off, subsurface drainage, uncontaminated cooling water, or un- polluted industrial process waters. M k. Any radioactive isotope in concentration greater than that permitted by applicable federal regulations. 1. Any ceramic glazing waste in excess of concentrations present in normal domestic sewage. m. Any lime, calcium sulphate or other similar sludges in excess of concentrations present in normal domestic sewage. n. Any other waters or wastes containing suspended solids or solutions of such character or quantity that unusual atten- tion or expense would be required in the handlinq'of."such waste materials at the waste treatment plant. Section 20-36. Conditions on discharge of certain types of wastes. No person shall discharge any of the following types of wastes into the sanitary sewer system without having fulfilled the conditions hereinafter stated in each instance: a. Packinghouse waste: All hair, bristles, hides or parts of hides, bones, animal parts, paunch manure, and viscera, stock feeds, grit, sand and straw in excess of concentrations present in normal domestic sewage, and all grease in excess of 100 parts per million shall be removed prior to discharge. b. Poultry processing waste: All feathers, parts of birds, bones, grit, sand, poultry feeds, and viscera in excess of con- centrations present in normal domestic sewage, and all grease in excess of 100 parts per million shall be removed prior to discharge. Materials used in construction of waste lines from poultry processing establishment to connection with the sanitary sewer system shall be of a type which isnotlikely to induce the formation and growth of bacterial protein masses. C. Textile wastes: All lint, thread, pieces of_ cloth, and yarn in excess of concentrations present in normal domestic sewage shall be removed prior to -discharge. Kierinq and acid boiling wastes shall be cooled, neutralized and stabilized with- in the limits specified in 520-35. Bleachery waste shall be cooled, neutralized and stabilized within the limits specified in 520-35. Sulfur dyeing wastec;.shall not be admitted to the sanitary sewer systerl. d. Metal Salts (iron, Copper, Zinc, Nickel, Chromium, Cadmiun, Lead, Etc.): Salts of,iron, copper, zinc, nickel, chromium, lead or other heavy metals in excess of concentrations present in normal domestic sewage shall be precipitated and re- moved from waste flow prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer system. Waste containing hexavalent chromium shall have chrom- ium reduced to the tri -valent state, precipitated and removed from the waste flow prior to.di.scharge to the sanitary sewer system. e. Cyanides: Cyanides in. the waste flow shall be com- pletely reduced to carbon dioxide and nitrogen prior to dis- charge to the sanitary sewer system. f. Phenol: Wastes containing phenol may be discharged to the sanitary sewer system only with a permit issued pursuant to 520-40. Before granting such permission the director of utili- ties shall require the person proposing to make such discharge to enter into an agreement with"the county, whereby such person shall regulate, vary or maintain, the discharge or concentration of phenol in accordance with the.requirements of the county. Section 20-37. Limitations on discharge of concentrated wastes. a. No person shall discharge wastes having a B.O.D. or suspended solids concentration in excess of 240 parts per mil- lion, defined as industrial wasteF by §20-33(f), into the sani- tary sewer system without having first obtained a permit for such discharge as provided in §2,0-40. b. Discharge of wastes having a B.O.D. or suspended solids concentration in excess of 500 parts per million shall be per- mitted by the director of utilities only after review and approval by him with respect to.the point o'f disch-arge into the san-.tary sewer system and the dilution afforded by other waste flows occurring in the system at such point. C. Discharge of wastes having a B.O.D. concentration in excess of 800 parts per million or a suspended solids concen- tration in excess of 700 parts per million shall not be per- mitted, and is hereby prohibited. Section 20-38. Permits and agreements for non -conforming -discharges. Notwithstanding the provisions of §§20-34 through 20-37 any person may apply to the director of utilities for a permit under 520-40 to discharge waste into the sanitary sewer system, which is of an unusual or otherwise prohibited strength or character. Such permit shall be,.granted by the director only upon execution by such person of an agreement, setting forth the conditions, pretreatment or other limitations required to enable such wastes to be safely accepted into the system. Section 20-39. Rate and volume of discharge of industrial wag.te . Slug discharge or batch dumping of industrial waste is pro- hibited. Any person now discharging or proposing to discharge industrial waste into the sanitary sewer system shall provide, at his own expense, a holding tank or holding tanks from which such waste shall be discharged at a uniform rate of flow over a twenty-four hour period. The requirement for a holding tank shall be waived by the director of utilities provided that: (1) the total daily waste .flow from the establishment of such person does not exceed 50,000 gallons and the maximum rate of discharge is not greater than 1/3 of the capacity (with respect to rate -of -flow) of the sewer receiving the waste, and provided further that the receiving sewer,has capacity for handling the maximum rate of industrial waste discharge from the establish- ment plus the maximum rate of waste flow from other contributors in the area tributary to the receiving sewer; or (2) the maximun rate of discharge from the establishment does not exceed 2.75 times the average rate of discharge as if taken over a twenty- four hour period, and such maximum rate of discharge is not greater than 1/3 of the capacity (with respect to rate -of -flow) of the sewer receiving the waste, and provided further that the receiving sewer has capacity for handling the maximum rate of industrial waste discharge from,the establishment plus the max- imum rate of waste flow from other contributors in the area tributary to the receiving sewer; and in addition (3) the char- acter of the waste is such that pretreatment with attendant safety holding facilities is not required, and (4) in all other respects, the discharge of such waste is in full compliance with this article. Section 20-40. Permits for dischar es; pretreatment; restric- tions . a. Any person now discharging, or desiring to discharge, industrial waste or pollutants into the sanitary sewer system shall make application for a permit to the Department of Util- ities. Such application shallinclude a complete chemical anal- ysis of the waste being discharged or proposed to be discharged, including concentration of B.O.D.. and suspended solids contained therein. Such application shall also contain pertinent flow data, including rates and duration, a detailed description of the operation, and any other relevant information•-reque-s ted by the director of utilities. b. Notwithstanding the provisions of §20-36 and 20-401 should the waste or pollutants from such person's operation be found to be inadmissable into the sanitary sewer systembecausee of objectionable character as defined by this article, of concentration of elements or substances in excess of the limits established by this article, or because of flow charac- teristics.incompatible with the best use of the receiving sewer, as set forth in this article, the director of utilities shall not approve a discharge of such waste or pollutants into the sanitary sewer system until such person has employed, at his own expense, such methods and processes of pretreatment and regulation of flow as will render the waste or pollutants ad- missable to the sanitary sewer system in accordance with this article. C. The methods and procedures of any pretreatment of in - ed shall arovedwaste underpollutants procedurepasysttipulatedeforreviewed and app original and approved application. d. The Department of Utilities will not specify, suggest, or recommend specific equipment, structures, or arrangements comprising any pretreatment processes, but will review any such plans on request of the applicant. e. Approval of discharge of indusstri iswaste of or pollutant! by any person will be given only on the per- formance of pretreatment processes (if pretreatment should be required) . f. Approval given to any wpether son for discharge not,ointo in- dustrial waste or pollutants, h Pretreatedor the sanitary sewer system shall in no way relieve such person of the responsibility of full -compliance with this article, within the limits established by such permit. Section 20-41 Procedures for application. C a. Any person now discharging industrial waste or pollu- tants into the sanitary sewer system shall have 60 days from the effective date of adoption -=of this ordinance to submit an application for a permit as provided in §20-40. Thereafter, any person desiring to discharge industrial waste or pollutants into the sanitary sewer system shall, 60 days prior to any such discharge, submit such an application. M b. Every application utilities or his designee 30 days of receipt. M shall be reviewed by the director of for approval or disapproval within C. Upon notice of final disapproval of any permit applica- tion or upon notice of modification of any permit, any person now discharging or desiring to discharge, industrial waste or pollutants into the sanitary sewer system shall submit a schedule for compliance with this article. Such schedule for compliance will be reviewed by the director of utilities; and approval thereof will be determined_ based on the reasonableness of such schedule with regard to the relative cost," the degree of hazard to the integrity of the sanitary sewer system, and the public safety. In no case will the required time for full compliance with this article exceed three years. The director may require full compliance with this article before the appli- cant may begin to discharge or continue to discharge any indus- trial waste or pollutants into the sanitary sewer system when- ever the Department of Utilities finds that such discharge is likely to pose an immediate danger to the sanitary sewer system of the County or the health, safety and general welfare of the public. d. Upon final approval of''an application for a permit to discharge industrial waste or pollutants into the sanitary sewer system the director of utilities shall issue such permit. A Section 20-42. Measurement of volume of industrial waste. The volume of industrial waste discharged by any person into the sanitary sewer system shall be measured by one or more of the following methods: $' a. If the volume of waste water produced by any person in his industrial or process operations is substantially the same as the volume of water purchased from the county, then the volume of water purchased shall be considered to be the volume of waste discharged. b. If_, in the establishment of any person discharging in- dustrial waste into the sanitary'sewer system, a substantial portion of the water purchased from the county is used for purposes resulting in normal domestic sewage, for cooling purposes, or for purposes that do not require the discharge of such used water to the sanitary sewer_ system, such person shall, at his own expense, either (1) install a meter of design approve by the director of utilities or his designee on the water supply line to his industrial process operations or (2) install a meter of design approved by the director of utilities or his designee on the waste line from such industrial process operations. The volume of water or waste flow, respectively, as measured through such meter shall be considered to be the volume of in- dustrial waste discharged into the sanitary sewer system. Such meters shall be capable of accurate measurement and recording of all rates of flow or other acceptable measurement to the extent deemed necessary by the county. i C. If any person now discharging or proposing to discharge industrial waste into the sanitary sewer system does not secure his entire water source from the 1. county such person shall, at his own expense, install a meter of design approved by the -dir- ector or his designee on the waste line from his industrial process operations. The volume of waste flow, as measured through such meter shall be considered to be the volume of waste discharged to the sanitary sewer system. Stiction 20-43. Access for measurements. a. Any person now discharging or proposing to di"§charge any industrial waste into the sanitary sewer system shall con- struct, at his own expense, a control manhole on the waste line from his industrial and process operations .for the purpose of facilitating observations, measurements, and sampling of the industrial waste discharge from such person's establishment. The control manhole shall be constructed in a suitable and satisfactory location downstream from any pretreatment facili- ties, holding tanks, or other approved works, and ahead of the point of discharge of such waste!,into the sanitary sewer system. The design of the control manhole shall be in accordance with the requirements established by the director of utilities or his designee. The control manhole shall be maintained by sudh person so as to be safe, accessible, and in proper operating condition at all times. b. Such requirement for a control manhole shall be waived by the director provided that: (1) the total daily waste flow from the establishment of such person does not exceed 50,000 gallons; and (2) the maximum rate: of such discharge from' said establishment does not exceed 100 gallons per minute; and (3) access, means, and facilities are provided within such establishment for the purpose of observing, measuring, and sampling the waste flow from such establishment; and (4) the discharge of all waste from such establishment, is in all other respects, in full compliance with. this article. Section 20-44. Determination of character and concentration of waste. a. The Department of Utilities shall make a periodic determination of the character and concentration of industrial waste or pollutants. b. Location and design of sampling sites for a periodic determination of the character and concentration of industrial waste or pollutants discharged into the sanitary sewer system shall be approved by the director of utilities. C. Samples of industrial waste or pollutants discharged into the sewer system shall be collected in such a manner as ma, be deemed necessary by the director of utilities, and analyzed for compliance with this article. The laboratory methods used in the examination of said waste waters shall be those set fortl in the latest edition of "Standard Methods". d. Such determination of the character and concentration of the industrial waste or pollutants discharged into the sani- tary sewer system shall be binding as a basis for surcharges on those persons discharging industrial waste or pollutants into the system. N 7 e. Costs incident to sampling and analyzing of waste or pollutants that are applicable to surcharges shall be added to t`ze .surcharge provided for in. ?20-45 made to all per3ons dis- charging is- charging industrial waste or pollutants into the county's sanitary system. Section 20-45. Cost recovery for treatment of industrial wastes In addition to the charges.provided for in 5520-21.1 and 20-50, a strong waste surcharge for the higher cost of treating excessive strength waste or pollutants shall be rendered to any person discharging industrial waste or pollutants in accordance with the following formula: a 62.4 V Surcharge = ((BOD -240) + (SS -240)) (1,000,000) ($0.04) BOD = Biochemical oxygen demand in parts per million of the industrial waste. SS = Suspended solids in parts per million of the indus- trial waste. V = Volume of the industrial waste in cubic feet. Such surcharges shall be shown separately on the regular bill rendered to the proper person by the director of utilities. Th- dischargers shall pay the surcharges in accordance with practices existing for payment of regular sewer charges. Section 20-46. Enforcement. a. In the event the director of utilities determines that a person required to obtain a permit for industrial waste dis- charge under the provisions of this article has failed to apply for such a permit, or that a person holding such a permit has violated the terms of his permit, or that any person has vio- lated or is violating any provisions of this article, he shall issue a compliance order requiring,such person to abate such violation within thirty days of the date of the order. Such order shall be sent to such person at the address used for his utility bills by certified mail, return receipt requested. In the event such person fails to comply with such order within the prescribed time period, the director shall suspend any dis- charge permit issued to such person, and shall terminate county water service to such person. b. Any person objecting to an order issued by the direc- tor of utilities under subsection (a) of this section shall have the right to appeal the same to a review committee comprised of three members of the Board of Supervisors appointed by the Chairman. Notice of intention to exercise such right to appeal shall be filed in writing with the Clerk of the Board of Super- visors within the time specified for compliance in the direc- tor's order. Failure to file such notice within such time limit shall be deemed a waiver'of the right to appeal. C. The review committee shall meet within thirty days of receipt of the notice of appeal and shall conduct a hearing on the objections raised by the appellant to the director's order. The appellant and the director_ shall each be afforded the oppor- tunity to present evidence and to cross examine the other's witnesses. The committee shall review the order of the direc- tor, with due regard for the reasonableness of the same, the degree of hazard to the integrity of the sanitary sewer system, the immediacy of the threat to the public health and safety, and the possibility of long-term damage to the environment posed by such violation. Based upon such criteria the committe( may affirm, modify, or vacate the director's order; provided that no such decision of the committee shall permit the continu- ance of a sewage discharge which does not conform to the stan- dards of this article without requiring full compliance with such standards within three years, as required by §20-41. d. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a) and (b) of this section, whenever the director determines that a person is discharging substances: into the sanitary sewer system which pose a clear and present danger to life or property, the director shall immediately suspend any discharge permit issued to such person and shall discontinue county water"sefvice to such person. ARTICLE IV INDUSTRIAL COST RECOVERY Section 20-47. Definitions. As used in this article the following words and phrases shall have the meanings hereinafter ascribed to them, unless otherwise clearly required by the context: a. BOD or biochemical oxygen demand shall mean the quan- tity of oxygen utilized in the biochemical oxidation cf organic matter under standard laboratory procedure in five (5) days at 20°C, expressed in parts per million. The laboratory determin- ation shall be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in "Standard Methods". b. Domestic Sewage shall mean waterborne wastes normally discharging from the sanitary conveniences of dwellings (includ ing apartment houses and hotels), office buildings, factories and institutions, free from storm surface water and industrial wastes. C. Industrial Cost Recovery Period shall mean that period during which the Federal grant amount allocable to the treat- ment of wastes from industrial users of the system, a period of thirty years for each such grant assisted treatment works. d. Industrial User shall mean any non-governmental user of the sewer system, as defined:'in 40 CFR 35.905-8 and identi- fied in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1972, United States Office of Management and Budget, as amended and supplemented, under the following divisions: (1) Division A: Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing; (2) Division B: Mining; (3) Division D: Manufacturing; (4) Division E: Transportation Communications, Electric, Gas,.and Sanitary Services; and (5) Division I: Services. e. Industrial Wastes shall mean all waterborne solids, liquids or gaseous wastes resulting from any industrial, manu- facturing or food processing operation or process, or from the development of any natural resource, or any mixture of these with water or domestic sewage as_pdistinct from normal domestic sewage. f_. Infiltration shall mean the water entering a sewer system, including sewer service connections, from the ground, through such means as, but not limited to, defective pipes, pipe joints, connections, or manhole walls. Infiltration does not include, and is distinguished from, inflow. g. Inflow shall mean the water discharged into a sewer system, including service connections from such sources as, but not limited to, roof leaders, cellar, yard, and area drains, foundation drains, cooling water discharges, drains from springs and swampy areas, manhole covers, cross connections from storm sewers and combined sewers, catch basins, storm waters, surface run-off, street wash waters, or drainage. Inflow does not in- clude, and is distinguished from,. infiltration. h. Major Industrial User shall mean an industrial user whose flow exceeds 50,000 gallons per day or whose known five- day biochemical oxygen demand or,concentration of -suspended solids exceeds 240 milligrams per liter of effluent discharged by such user into the sewer system. i. Minor Industrial User shall mean an industrial user which is not a major industrial user. j. Normal Domestic Sewage shall mean sewage in which con- centrations of suspended solids and five,(5)-day 20°C BOD do not exceed 240 parts per million.each by weight. k. Sewage shall mean a combination of water -carried waste from residences, business buildings, institutions, and indus- trial establishments, together with such ground, surface and storm waters as may be present. 1. Sewer shall mean a pipe -or conduit used to collect and carry away sewage or storm water run off from the generating source to sewage tireAtment plants or receiving streams. M. Standard Methods shall mean the examination and analy- tical procedures set forth in the latest edition, at the time o analysis, of "Standard Methods' for the Examination of Water an Wastewater" as prepared, approved, and published jointly by the A.W.W.A., W.P.C.F. and the American Public Health Association. n. Suspended Solids shall mean solids that either float on the surface of, or are in suspension in, water, sewage, or other liquids, and which are removable by laboratory filtering. Quantitative determination or suspended solids shall be made in accordance with procedures set forth in "Standard Methods". Section 20-48. Exclusions., a. An industrial user who would otherwise be subject to Industrial cost recovery shall be excluded from this article to the extent that: 1. The industrial user discharges only non -process segregated domestic wastes or wastes from sanitary conveniences; and 2. The industrial user.is not.a significant user as defined in §35.925-12.t.,,; b. Those industrial users which have reserved a portion o an existing treatment works under contract or agreement executed prior to March 1, 1.973 and which have paid a reasonable portion of the capital costs associated with that reserved capacity, as determined by the Regional Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, shall be excluded from parti- cipation in Industrial cost recovery, to the extent of the capa city so reserved. Section 20-49. Reserved Ca acity Agreements After March 1, 1973. a. Reserved capacity agreements entered into after March 1, 1973 shall not exclude the industrial user from participa- tion in industrial cost recovery. The industrial user shall pay the full industriAl cost recovery payments allocable to the capacity reserved, and, in the event that such an industrial user exceeds its reserved capacity, its full use shall be sub- ject to this article, unless otherwise excluded. b. Provided, however that, if the treatment works are expanded in the future with federal grant assistance, an in- dustrial user who has executed a reserved capacity agreement and has made industrial cost recovery payments based upon reserved capacity, will not -incur additional industrial cost recovery charges associated with the cost of expansion until the industrial user's actual use of the treatment works exceeds its reserved capacity. a C. Such industrial users shall, however, be required to pay any additional industrial cost recovery charges associated with the cost of upgrading a treatment works. Section 20-50. Computation of Industrial Cost Recovery Payments a. During the industrial cost recovery period, each indus- trial user shall pay its share of the total amount of Federal grant funds, including amendments to grants, which are alloca- ble to capacity used or committed for use in the treatment of wastes from industrial users. The payment for each industrial user shall be computed in accordance with the following formula which takes flow, five-day biochemical oxygen demand and the concentration of suspended solids into account as the primary factors which influence the cost of treatment works construc- tion: Industrial Cost Recovery Formula (Q-0 ) (BOD -BOD ) (SS -SST) ICR = [ ((4 x CQ* -I*) + ( (BOD*)- x CBOD*) + F SS* x CSS, P x R Where ICR = Cost to be recovered from an industrial user Q = Average daily wastewater flow contributed by the user durin(, the billing period (gallons per day) QD = Average daily wastewater flow that is certified as primar- ily segregated domestic waste contributed by the user dur- ing the billing period (gallons per day) Q* = The average of the sum of certified hydraulic capacity existing in all grant assisted treatment works in the County system during the billing period (gallons per day) I* = The sum of hydraulic capacities existing in grant assisted County treatment plants that is allocable to design year it filtration and inflow, as determined from grant documents (gallons per day) CQ* -I* =7he average of the sum of the Federal grant costs allocable to the non-infiltration/inflow component of hydraulic capacity in all County treatment works durin the billing period (dollars) BOD = The average daily poundage of five day biochemical oxygen demand contributed by a user during the billing period, calculated as Q x SBOD x 8.34, where 5 S = Most recent available BOD concentration of a user's BODS total waste stream as determined in conformance with 520-53 (parts per million) BODD = The average daily poundage of five-day biochemical oxyge demand contributed by the primarily segregated domestic � J waste component of a user's waste stream during the bil- ling period, calculated as OD x SBOD x 8.34, where 5 SBOD = Most recentavailableBODS concentration of the domes - SD tic component of a user's waste stream as determined ir conformance with §§20-48 and 20-53 (parts per million) BOD* = The average of the sum of grant- assisted design influent BODS capacity in all County treatment works_dgring the billing period (pounds per day) CBOD* - The average of the sum of Federal grant costs allocable to BODS removal during the billing period (dollars) SS = The average daily poundage of suspended solids contributed by a user during the billing period, calculated as Q x SSS x 8.34, where S = Most recent available suspended solids concentration of SS a user's total waste stream as determined .in conformance with 520-53 (parts per million) SSD = The average daily poundage of suspended solids contrib utec by the primarily segregated domestic waste component of a user's waste stream during the billing period, calculated as QD x SSSD x 8.34, where S = Most recent available suspended solids concentration ofSSD the domestic component of a user's waste stream as deter- mined in conformance with S§20-48 and 20-53. SS* = The average of the sum of grant assisted design influent suspended solids capacity in all County treatment works during the billing period (pounds per day) CSS* = The average of the sum of Federal grant costs allocable to suspended solids removal during the billing period (dollars) P = Length of the billing period (in days) R = Length of the cost recovery period (in days) b. Any industrial user which discharges into the County system of wastewater treatment works shall be subject to this article, unless excluded, as provided above, and the industrial cost recovery charges for such user shall accrue from the date of the user's initial discharge into the County system or the effective date of this ordinance, whichever is later, and shall continue to accrue for the unexpired portion of the industrial .cost recovery period or until the user ceases to use the County system, whichever_ occurs first. if an industrial user termin- ates, with the consent of the County, any agreement for reservee capacity which was executed. after March 1, 1973, its payment foi industrial cost recovery shall cease, to the extent of the reserved capacity so terminated. C. If there is a substantial change in the strength, volume, or delivery flow rate characteristics introduced into the treatment works by an industrial user, such user's share shall be adjusted accordingly, when the County has made such a determination. d. If there is an expansion or upgrading of the treatment works, each existing industrial user's share shall be adjusted accordingly except that the expansion of capacity resulting from the correction or reduction of inflow and/or infiltration, shall not affect the user's industrial cost recovery share. e. An industrial user's share shall not include any por- tion of the grant amount allocable to capacity not used or reserved by such user. f. An industrial user's share shall not include an inter- est component. Section 20-51. Industrial Cost Recgvery Billing. a. The first industrial cost recovery bills shall be issued to industrial users no later than ten (10) months from the effective date of this Ordinance. Thereafter, all indus- trial users shall be billed on their normal wastewater user charge billing dates at a constant charge per billing unless the amount is increased or decreased in accordance with this article. b. An industry may fulfill its cost recover obligation by making a lump sum payment for its entire share of the Federal grant. Such payments shall either by processed as a normal Industrial cost recovery payment or set aside in a sep- arate account to be drawn on annually .for the remainder of the cost recovery period. .Lump sum payments will not relieve an industry from the obligation of making additional future pay- ments should its :caste flow or load increase. Discounts from the total cost recovery requirement will not be given to indus- tries making advanced Industrial cost recovery payments. Section 20-52. Disposition of Industrial Cost Recovery Revenue.1 a. All funds recovered during the annual accounting period, with the exception of the discretionary portion, shall be depos-j ited in interest-bearing accounts which are fully collateralized by obligations of the United States Government or by obligations fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United States Government or any agency thereof. b. Within one year of the effective date of this Ordinance, and thereafter at least annually and within four months after the close of the County's fiscal year, the County shall transfe by check payable to the United States Environmental Protection Agency fifty percent (50%) of all industrial cost recovery revenues collected during such fiscal year and any interest earned thereon. Forty percent (400) of any industrial costs recovered and all interest which has accrued on the said forty percent (40%) shall be placed in an industrial cost re- covery account entitled "Expansion and Upgrading Account". Funds in this Expansion and Upgrading Account shall be expended only for replacement or expansion of grant -assisted treatment works.; The remaining ten percent (10%) industrial cost recovery revenues shall be used to administer this Ordinance and for such other uses as the County shall deem proper, except for the construc- tion of industrial pre-treatment facilities or rebates to indus- trial users' cost incurred by such users in complying with Federal user charges or industrial cost recovery requirements. C. Prior to committing any of the funds retained for the construction of treatment works, the County shall obtain the approval of thy: Regional Administrator, which will be based upon a determination that the proposed use of the funds would be for eligible costs of a project for expansion and reconstruction of treatment works within the County's jurisdiction. The County shall provide a preliminary engineering report sufficiently detailed so as to permit a determination of eligibility, and an estimate of eligible costs. Section 20-53. Monitoring. a. All major industrial users shall be monitored at such times as the County may deem necessary, but at least annually. b. All minor industrial users, as defined herein, shall be monitored on a random basis, by Standard Industrial Classi- fication categories, as set forth in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1972, United States Office of Manage- ment and Budget, as amended and. supplemented. The wastewater characteristics of each such category shall be reviewed not less frequently than annually. In the event that -actifal data is not feasibly available for a particular category, values of 240 milligrams per liter of five-day biochemical oxygen demand and 240 milligrams per liter of suspended solids shall be assigned to such category and the industrial users therein until actual data to the contrary is obtained. Section 20-54. Appeals. a. An industrial user or other aggrieved party may appeal to a Hearing Officer, who shall be appointed by the Director of Utilities, who may be an employee of the County, on the issues of (1) exclusion from the industrial cost recovery plan by rea- son of contract or the discharge of primarily segregated domes- tic wastes and/or (2) on the issue of the amount of the indus- trial cost recovery assessment with particular regard to flow, five-day biochemical oxygen demand, and the concentration of suspended solids. b. Any existing industrial user may apply within one year of the effective date of this article for exclusion from par- ticipation in the Industrial Cost Recovery ordinance on the bases provided above. New industrial users (those who connect to the County service system after the effective date of this Plan) shall have one year from the date of their initial connec- tion in which to apply for exclusion.. An Application for Exclu- sion shall include a schematic diagram of the user's production processes, waste pretreatment and a conveyance systems, and a series of waste strength tests in conformance with County acceped procedures and guidelines which shall be available on request, all such diagrams shall be certified as accurate by an entity licensed in this state. All such test results shall be certified as having been performed in accordance with County accepted pro- cedures and their accuracy shall be certified by a qualified chemist or laboratory located within the Commonwealth of Vir- ginia. C. Within 30 days after the mailing date of each indus- trial cost recovery bill, an industrial user who is included within this Plan may file an Application for Exclusion or an Application for Redetermination of Assessment with the Hearing Officer, but only in the event of a substantial change in qual- ity or quantity of effluent discharge by such user arising sub- sequent to the last redetermination. Such changes shall be certified by a qualified chemist or laboratory as having occur- red and such a chemist or laboratory shall also certify that tests indicating the substantial changes aforesaid were con- ducted in accordance with County accepted procedures. d. All applications shall set�fbrth the industrial user's name, and address along with a brief statement of the reasons it is petitioning and the factual basis for the Application. Applications shall set forth the names of the officers, attor- neys, employees, and witnesses who will be appearing before the Hearing Officer. Applications shall be filed with three copies and sent by registered mail to the Hearing Officer at the place for which payment of charges is specified in the industrial cost recovery bill from which the appeal is taken. e. Procedure. The Hearing Officer shall notify the Appli- cant by mail of the time and place for hearing, such notice to be given within 30 days after receipt of any application. The hearing shall be conducted on the Application not less than 10 days after mailing of such notice. The hearing shall be held as an informal consultation and conference at which the Appli- cant, in person or by counsel, shall present his argument, evi- dence, data, and proof in connection with the issues submitted. A representative from the County may then present its factual basis for the exclusion or assessment under consideration. The Hearing Officer shall not be bound -by the usual rules.-Q.f, evidenc but may conduct the hearing in such a manner as in his judgment will expeditiously and accurately determine the substantial rights of the industrial user and the County. All hearings may be stenographically or electronically recorded. The Hearing Officer shall make findings of fact and recommendations which shall be submitted to the director of utilities for his deci- sion, the results of which shall be made known to the Applicant. f. No hearing shall be held and no decision shall be ren- dered by the County with respect to exclusions sought on the basis of reserved capacity contract executed prior to March 1, 1973. Upon receipt of an Application for Exclusion from indus- trial cost recovery on this ground, the County shall forward the request and appropriate documentation to the Regional Ad- ministrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency within thirty (30) days. The Regional Administrator will make his determination and the Petitioner will be notified by the County. Section 20-55. Penalties. a. Any person, firm or corporation who shall violate any provisions of this Ordinance or who shall fail to comply with any provision hereof shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine not to exceed $1,000. b. Failure to pay the ICR share for industrial waste dis- charges when due shall be sufficient cause to disconnect any and all services to the sewer mains of the County, and the same penalties and charges, now or hereafter provided for by this Chapter for failure to pay the bill for utility service when due, shall be applicable in like manner for failure to pay the ICR share. (2) That §§20-4, 20-5, 20-13, 20-15, 20-12 and 20-26 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield are amended and reenacted as follows: Section 20-4. Same --County utilities department to supervise. The county -health utilities department shall have the general supervision over treatment of the public water supply with fluoride and-the-utilities-degarteat provided, however, that the utilities department is directed to furnish to the health department copies of records specified under section 20-3 at daiky,--wL-ekIy-eFtd-meathiy such intervals as may be required by the county health department. Section 20-5 Same --Health department to make periodic reports to the board of supervisors. The county health department is-hereby-directed-te may make ger.iedie reports to the board of supervisors on the fluori- dation of the public water supply and to seek the cooperation of educational and scientific institutions to conduct surveys and research as to the beneficial effectR i-f-aayx of the program and-gre�eet on the citizens of this the county. 104W `4 Section 20-13. Termination of service for nonpayment of water charge; additional charges. If the bill for water charge shall remain unpaid for fif- teen days after becoming delinquent and written notice has been given to the user that water supply at the premises shall be discontinued, the supply of water to the premises shall be discontinued and such water supply shall not be restored until the delinquent account and a charge of fi*ae ten dollars for reconnecting the service has been paid in full to the treasurer of the county. Section 20-15. Water emergency --Authority of water committee. The water committee of the board of supervisors of the county is hereby authorized to declare emergencies in the county affecting the use of water in any area of the county during any period in which there is a water shortage and to control and restrict the use of water during an emergency in the County caused by a water shortage or other cause. Section 20-19. Compliance with article. No person shall install, alter or repair any connection intended to connect the sewerage facilities of any premises in the county with a system operated by the county until such per- son complies with the terms of this article. Thia-artieie shaii-net_a"persede-anp-eeMtraet"ei-egreemerrts-�ait?�-afters-of tYte-ftewerage-ft�fttem-made-Brier-te-Aprii-�8; -i368 Section 20-26. Sewer connections --Ownership; responsibility. The ownership of connections between premises and main sewers, including those portions located within the rights of way of public or private streets, shall be vested in the owners of such premises. The county shall not be responsible for the operation and maintenance of such connec- tions. the-board-ef-ftt�per�isers-ftkaii-riot-be-reftgerrftil�le-for tl�e-repair-ef -er:p-ear:rceetieri-e�rsiesft-tl�e-rreeeftftitp-f er-fttxel� repair-ear;-be-preen-te-be-eaased-b�*-er-to-�ta�e-beery-est�sed bp-tl°re- mpreper-fanetiening-ef-the -main-ftewer-te-whieh-it-is corrrreeted- (3) That S§20-9, 20-20 and 20-21 are hereby repealed. (4) That this ordinance shall be effective on and after Thursday, July 1, 1977. EM CM AIN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT SECTIONS 20--10 AND 20-27 OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1975, AS AMENDED, RELATING GENERALLY TO SEWER AND WATER CON- NECTION FEES BE IT ORDAINED by the Hoard of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 20-10 and 20-27 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield are amended and reenacted as follows: Section 20-10. Mater line extension requirements; costs, reimbursements. :he board of supervisors will authorize the installation of water extensions to extend the county's water system at the expense of developers and refund to developers the total cost or part thereof, to the extent permitted by this section, out of connection charges made can said nes in accordance w th the following policy: a. The county shall determine the feasibility of all requests for water extensions, and no extension will be made unless such extension is determined to be in the best interests of the county utility system and the health, safety and welfare o f County res iaints . b. No water .line extensions or installations shall be made without a contract with the county. Every such contract shall provide for the developer depositing the estimated cost of such extension with the county or supply the county with a copy of an accepted executed contract with an approved licensed utility contractor; the furnishing of all necessary rights of way by developer; title of such extension to vest in the county upon completion of the construction; and refund provisions to be null and void and of no effect if the county is prohibited from collecting connection charges and any such refund provi- sions rovisions provided shall be deemed separable from the remaining covenants, obligations and agreements and shall in no way affect the validity of the other provisions of the agreement. The county shall approve the size, type, location and material of w1l water mains and other facilities, and they shall be installed in accordance with county standards and specifications. All contractors installing such facilities shall be approved by the county. If private contractors install such facilities, cost of such installation shall, within thirty days of completion, be filed with the county. C. The entire cont, including the actual cost incurred and paid out by the county, plus a fixed overhead charge of fifteen percent of extending water ruins shall be paid for by the person or parsons making the extension when work is per- formed by county forces. Men contract work is performed by an approved contractor, an inspection fee of two percent will be charged based on final actual cost. The estimated amount of be deposit *4 at the times a<+and The county will pay the difference in cost between an eight in main and a larger size main installed, except when it is deter- mined that a larcrer site thin is needed to serve thero er being develo e e erence n cost etween t e eight nch main and the lar er -main installed shall be the difference in material and labor cost, as determined by the county. NOW A separate service shall be required for each house, each unit of duplex homes or separate business establishments. Where one meter serves a trailer court, apartment or other property approved by the board, the county shall require a minimum water service charge for each unit :nerved on said property. No more than one dwelling unit or business establishment may be connected to a service line except those approved by the board upon proper application. d. When water lines are installed at developer's cost, a reduction of two hundred fifty dollars for each service connec- tion made within the subdivision shall be allowed. The reduction of two hundred fifty dollars for each service connection shall be allowed when application is made for service. The reduction shall apply to any person making application to connect property located within the boundaries of said property covered by the extension contract. In a new subdivision, the developer shall eay the County to have water lines, mater yokes and meter boxes installedin all. new subdivision streets after the road is con- structed to sub -grade and prior to the base course being placed. The developer shall pay one hundred dollars for each connection at the time application is made for the service lines. When the meter is applied for, the balance due shall be paid in accordance with the county ordinance. When required, sewers shall be in- stalled prior to the installation of water mains and service lines. e. Reimbursement of one hundred and fifty dollars for each service connection within the property being developed shall be made for water lin€, extensions outside the development when the extension will also serve property between developer and source of water. This refund of one hundred and fifes dollars will apply to large size mains, over eight inc lei s in size, installed within or without the developer's property when the county requires a larger main and does not have the capital to install the larger size main and the developer wishes to finance the installation thereof. This cost shall be as determined by the county. No refund will be made for an extension of two :hundred feet or less. When a refund is requested on an exten- sion, the developer shall furnish a plat of the tract of land to be developed showing boundaries, title to the property and such other information required by the county. The area to be covered in the refund must be spprdved-k�lr-tke-been-cs£-caper- v+sers conn uous to the water extension line and reasonably related to the propose3 3evelopment of t ® area. In addition, of supervisors e re area to oe cove re f. When -water-+krtes-are -fennel+eek-with-eeUrrtp-fan.3er-the eertrteetfea-e�rerge-icer-ctx4a�t�rtg-herpes-�►�� be-redaced-by-enc hanelree4-ff f ty-ee�e��aera-ff-flee--eerrreeet�ert-# tt-app��ec�-fer-ref tk�n thrtY-cay3-after-nzter-aterv�ee-3aeee�nea-eve�le: A develop ma be germitted to install all water service laterals in`a iubdivision for whiES Fie has de2osited $150.00 or eac,5 Iateral t ;; 3eve loper Murnishea all e!guipment an2l la or For the in- stallat on of the service laterals, including corporation stops motdk as mater MWs s222lemental material necessary meet County specifications - P" _ mater a s sHall be furnished y the Count at the Count Shona and StoraLeyard. Me deVeloper shall nsta service laterals fora ots on fhe street within e deve opment. The Count will reimburse the develo er $40.04 for the instal at on of each service lateral. The eveloper sal onaa connection tee snail be pUabie to ve ooer requests nstallationo the me I%W IWAW g. Reimbursement to developers under all existing exten- sion policy contracts shall continue in effect and the reim- bursements to be paid as pzovided herein shall only apply to extensions made subsequent to Aprii-I-r--1-9-76 the effective date of this ordinance. h. The developer shall be required to cut all streets and install water lines in all streets within A -Subdivision, unless specifically exeted by the county. i. All reimbursements due as provided in subsection (e) of this section shall be paid Periodically to those entitled to be reimbursed in accordance with the provisions herein. J. Vie county will ordinarily install the service connec- tion and the meter at the same time, except as provided in subsection (d) of this section. Location of grades for top of meter box shall be furnished by applicant; it is agreed that if raising or lowering of meter is necessary after initial instal- lation, a charge of ten dollars will be paid. When it is neces- sary to raise or lower the dater service, this work will be done at cost plus fifteen percent. Section 20-27. Same --Char es --Generali . Connection charges for sewage treatment in the county including the Ettrick Sanitary district shall be as follows: (a) Single family. (1) Existing residence, already having septic tank system when application is made within time allotted by county air notice that sewer service is available, rex seven hundred d ftfty dollars; thereafter, twelve hundred dollars. (2) New resaidenoe whose service lateral is connected to sewer installed by developer, r m seven huh re oliars. (3) New residence whose service lateral is connected to sewer not installed by developer, twelve hun red 3ollars. (b) Duplexes. Same as single family ros.i&-nce for unit in thee. (c) Mobile homes not located in a mobil subdivision. Same as r (d) Churches. Same as single family residence. when churches arcs useTor schools, kindergartens, etc., charges shall be based on equivalent single family units. (e) _�paa rtmen and moii` iums_and townhouses, mobile home s ...... _ (1) Existing. when application is made within time allotted by county after notice is given that sewer service is "ee, ems. asrvrm+id and Elft dol1.L after, twelve hid dollars ped. (2) New. Six Seven hundred dollars per unit on lines installed by developer; tw�e�ve' hundred dollars on lines installedwith county funds. (f) Travel trailer cams hotels and motels. (1) Existing. When application is made within time allotted by county after notice is given that sewer service is available, two hundred dollars per unit; thereafter, four hundred dollars per unit. (2) New. Four hundred dollars. EM rn (g) Commercial, industrial and institutional. (1) Fxisting. When application is made within time allotted by the county after notice is given that sewer service is available, twelve hundred dollars per acre with a minimum charge of six hundrdd dollars for each such establishment; thereafter, seventeen hundred fifty dollars per acre with a minimum charge of twelves hundred dollars for each such estab- lishment. (2) New. When sewer extension is made by developer, twelve hundred dollars per acre with a minimum charge of six hundred dollars for each such establishment. (3) New commercial connected to sewer not installed by the developer. Seventeen hundred fifty dollars per acre with a minimum charge of twelve hundred dollars. (h) Hospitals, nursing homesr or homes for adults. (1) Hospitals, three hundred dollars per bed. (2) Nursing homes, two hundred dollars per bed. (3) Homes for adults as defined in Section 63.1-172 of the Code of Virginia, boarding houses and rooming houses, one hundred dollars per bed of the same, as a single family residence; whichever is greater. { f �--Mfse� k�elr�eser�:lr--Ani►-ee�ed�tfer�--net-ee�re�a-a�beve-er any-�eea#ark-eseme�ft�ren-a�het��-bee-segetfate~d: (2) That this ordinance shall be effective on and after April 28, 1977. I AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1975, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING 5520-9.1, 20-18.1, 20-21.1, AND 5§20-33 THROUGH 2O-55, AMENDING 5520-4, AND 20-5, 4ierB, 20-13, 20-15, 20-19, 20-26 AND -7 AND REPEALING §§20-9, 20-20 AND 20-21 RE- LATING GENERALLY TO SEWER AND WATER RATES, INDUSTRIAL (I WASTE DISCHARGES, INDUSTRIAL COST RECOVERY AND PRO- VIDING, FOR A PENALTY �I j BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: !i (1) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1975, as amended, is amended by adding 5§20-9.1, 20-18.1, 20-21.1 and i; 20-33 through 2.0-55 as follows: Section 20-9.1. Water Rates. In all cases not covered by contract made by the Board of Supervisors prior to the effective date of this ordinance, in- cluding the Ettrick Sanitary District, the monthly rate for consumption of water to be paid by the owner shall include a minimum monthly service charge based on the meter size serving the premise and a volume charge, in accordance with the follow- ing schedule: a. Minimum Service Charge Per Premise: Water Meter Size (Inches) Monthly Amount 5/8 or. 3/4 .........................$ 4.00 1 .................................... 7.50 1-1/4 ................................ 11.00 1-1/2 ................................ 14.00 2 .................................... 19.00 3 .................................... 37.00 4 .................................... 62.00 6 .................................... 125.00 8 .................................... 225.00 10 .................................... 350.00 12 .................................... 500.00 b. Volume Charge: i First 400 cu. ft . .................no charge Next 9,600 cu. ft . ................70(, per 100 cu. ft. Next 20,000 cu. ft . ...............55q, per 100 cu. ft. Next 200,000 cu. ft . ..............50(,� per 100 cu. ft. t Next 200,000 cu. ft . ..............40� per 100 cu. ft. Next 300,000 cu. ft . ...............30( per 100 cu. ft. All in excess of 730,000 cu. ft. ..28C per 100 cu. ft. C. Multiple Unit Residence Charge: The minimum monthly charge shall be applicable to all apartments, condominiums, duplexes, mobile homes and other premises wherein more than one living unit is served by one service connection. The service charge shall be the service charge for a 5/8 -inch or 3/4 -inch meter plus $4.00 per living unit for each unit in excess of one. The amount of water included in the service charge shall be determined by multiplying the total number of living units by 400 cubic feet. The volume charge shall be the same as for all other classes of customers for all water in excess of the product of the total number of units times 400 cubic feet. n M Section 20-18.1. Use of water system upon certain conditions. If the director of utilities determines that a proposed industrial, commercial or domestic use of the County water sys- tem is reasonably likely to cause damage or constitute a hazard to the water system, the director of utilities may impose reason able conditions upon the applicant asking for water service regarding type and manner of use which are designed to minimize j danger to the County water system. Section 20-21.1. Same - Sewer user charge service rates. All owners of premises who have contracted to connect, who have connected or who shall hereafter connect the sewerage facilities of such premises to the County sewerage system shall be required to pay a monthly user charge composed of a meter size minimum service charge and a volume charge to recover the operation and maintenance expenses of the sewer system in accordance with the following schedule: a. Service Charge Per Premise Winimum Charge): Water Meter Size (Inches Monthly Amount 5/8 or 3/4 .......................$ 5.00 11.00 1-1/4 17.00 b. In those instances where residential premises are con- nected to the sewer system but not to the County water system, the user shall pay $10.00 per month. c. In those instances where a residential unit for which a connection fee has been paid, but sewer has not been connec- ted, the user shall pay $5.00 per month. d. The Multiple -unit Residence Charge shall be applicable to all apartments, condominiums, duplexes, mobile homes and other premises wherein more than one living unit is served. by one service connection. The service charge will be the service charge for a 5/8 -inch or 3/4 -inch meter plus $5.00 per living unit for each unit in excess of one in addition to the appli- cable volume charge. e. In addition, a volume charge as measured by the water meter per 100 cubic feet shall be made in accordance with the following schedule: �I Residential.... .$0.57 per 100 cu. ft. II Commercial ......................$0.57 per 100 cu. ft. i Industrial ......................$0.57 per 100 cu. ft. f. Where applicable, those users of the County sewer sys- tem shall, in addition to the basic user charge provided for herein, pay a surcharge covering the cost of treating excessive strength waste or pollutants as provided in Article III herein- after, and a surcharge covering the industrial share of capital improvements for wastewater treatment as defined by applicable federal regulations and as provided in Article IV hereafter. .............................. 22.00 1-1/2 .............................. 30.00 2 .................................. 65.00 3 ................................. 100.00 4 .................................. 200.00 6 .................................. 375.00 8 .................................. 500.00 10 .................................. 650.00 12 .................................. c. In those instances where a residential unit for which a connection fee has been paid, but sewer has not been connec- ted, the user shall pay $5.00 per month. d. The Multiple -unit Residence Charge shall be applicable to all apartments, condominiums, duplexes, mobile homes and other premises wherein more than one living unit is served. by one service connection. The service charge will be the service charge for a 5/8 -inch or 3/4 -inch meter plus $5.00 per living unit for each unit in excess of one in addition to the appli- cable volume charge. e. In addition, a volume charge as measured by the water meter per 100 cubic feet shall be made in accordance with the following schedule: �I Residential.... .$0.57 per 100 cu. ft. II Commercial ......................$0.57 per 100 cu. ft. i Industrial ......................$0.57 per 100 cu. ft. f. Where applicable, those users of the County sewer sys- tem shall, in addition to the basic user charge provided for herein, pay a surcharge covering the cost of treating excessive strength waste or pollutants as provided in Article III herein- after, and a surcharge covering the industrial share of capital improvements for wastewater treatment as defined by applicable federal regulations and as provided in Article IV hereafter. `OOK ' %d g. The owner of the premises where the sewerage facilities of the county have been contracted for shall be liable for the payment of all charges made for service rendered to such pre- mises until such owner makes application for discontinuance of service on forms furnished by the county. If water and/or sewer charges are not paid for a period of thirty days, then the county may discontinue water and sewer service. ARTICLE III INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE Section 20-33. Definitions. As used. in this Article the following words and phrases shall have the meanings hereinafter ascribed to them, unless otherwise clearly required by the context: a. "B.O.D." or "biochemical oxygen demand" shall mean the quantity of oxygen utilized in the biochemical oxidation of organic matter, under standard laboratory procedure, in five days at 20°C, expressed in parts per million. The laboratory determination shall be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in "Standard Methods". b. "Domestic sewage" shall mean waterborne wastes normally' discharging from the sanitary conveniences of dwellings (includ- ing apartment houses and hotels), office buildings, factories and institutions, free from ground water, storm surface water and industrial wastes. C. "Garbage" shall mean solid wastes and residue from the; preparation, cooking and dispensing of food, and from the han- dling, an-dling, storage and sale of food products and produce. d. "Industrial wastes" shall mean all waterborne solids, liquids or gaseous wastes resulting from any industrial manu- facturing, trade, business or food processing operation or pro- cess, or from the development of any natural resource, or any mixture of these with water or domestic sewage as distinct from normal domestic sewage. e. "Natural outlet" shall mean any outlet into a water- course, pond, ditch, lake or other body of surface or ground- water. f. "Normal domestic sewage" shall mean sewage in which concentration of suspended materials and five day 20°C B.O.D. is established. at 240 parts per million each, by weight, on the basis of the normal daily contribution of twenty hundredths pounds per capita, per 100 gallons. g. "Parts per million" the parts per million value be equivalent to pounds per shall mean a weight to weight ratio'; multiplied by the factor 8.345 shall! million gallons of water. h. "Persons" shall mean any and all persons, natural or artificial, including any individual, firm, company, industry, municipal or private corporation. i. "pH" shall mean the logarithm (base 10) of the recip- rocal of the hydrogen ion concentration of a solution. It shall be determined by one of the procedures outlined in "Stan- dard Methods". j. "Point of discharge" shall mean the point at which waste is discharged to the Chesterfield County sewers. I i� k. "Properly shredded garbage" shall mean wastes from the preparation, cooking and dispensing of food which have been shredded to such a degree that all particles will be carried under the flow conditions normally prevailing in the county san- itary sewer system, with no particle greater than one-half inch in any dimension. 1. "Sanitary sewer" shall mean a sewer which carries sew- age and to which storm, surface and ground waters are not inten- tionally admitted. m.„ Sewage„ shall mean a combination of water -carried waste from residential, commercial, institutional and industrial establishments, together with such ground, surface and storm waters as may be present. n. "Sewage treatment plant” shall mean any arrangement of devices and structures used for treating sewage. o. "Sewer” shall mean a pipe or conduit used to collect and carry away sewage or storm water run off from the generat- ing source to sewage treatment plants or receiving streams. p. "Sewerage" shall mean the system of sewers and appur- tenances for the collection, transportation, pumping and treat- ment of sewage and industrial wastes. q. "Sewer service charge" shall mean the charge levied by X20-21.1 on all users of the county sanitary sewerage system, whose wastes do not exceed in strength the concentration values established as representative of normal domestic sewage. r. "Slug" shall mean any discharge of water, sewage or industrial waste which, in concentration of any given constit- uent, or in quantity of flow, exceeds for any period of dura- tion longer than fifteen minutes more than five times the aver- age twenty-four hour concentration or flows during the normal operation. S. "Standard Methods" shall mean the examination and analytical procedures set forth in the latest edition, at the time of analysis, of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater as prepared, approved and published jointly by the American Public Health Association, the American Water Works Association and the Water Pollution Control Federation. t. "Storm sewer or storm drain" shall mean a sewer which carries storm and surface waters but excludes sewage and indus- trial wastes. U. "Storm water run-off" shall mean that portion of the rainfall that is drained into the storm sewers. V. "Suspended solids" shall mean solids that either float on the surface of, or are in suspension in, water, sewage, or other liquids, and which are removable by laboratory filtering. Quantitative determination of suspended solids shall be made in accordance with procedures set forth in "Standard Methods". Section 20-34 Restriction on usage of sanitary sewers. The discharge of industrial waste into the County sanitary sewer system shall be permitted provided that: a. Sewer capacity is available on a basis compatible with the best overall use of the sewer. b. The waste to be discharged is amenable to treatment by the processes employed in the waste treatment plants of Chester- field County. C. The waste to be discharged will not cause damage or constitute a hazard to the sanitary sewer system or waste treat- ment facilities and will not constitute a hazard to humans or animals, nor be capable of creating a public nuisance. d. The concentration of substances, compounds, and ele- ments in the waste being discharged or proposed to be discharges do not exceed the limits established by this article. e. All other requirements of this article are complied with, including the obtaining of a permit as required by 520-40. Section 20-35. Substances not to be deposited in sanitary sewer system. No person shall cause to be discharged or deposited any of the following into any sewer forming a part of the sanitary sewer system of the county: a. Any waste, liquid, or vapor having a temperature highe than 150 degrees Farenheit. b. Any water or waste containing more than 100 parts per million of fat, oil, or grease, exclusive of soap. C. Any gasoline, benzene, naphtha or other hydrocarbon solvents or oils, or other flammable or explosive liquids, solids or gases. d. Any solid waste in excess of concentrations present in normal domestic sewage that has not been properly shredded. e. Any ashes, cinders, sand, mud, straw, shavings, lint, I glass, rags, metals, feathers, tar, plastics, wood, paunch manure, insulation materials, fibers of any kind, stock or poul try feeds, processed grains, viscera or other fleshy particles from processing or packing plants, or any other solid or viscous substance in excess of concentrations present in normal domestiq sewage capable of causing obstruction to flow in sewers or interference with proper operation of waste treatment facilities. f. Any waters or wastes having a stabilized pH lower than 6.0 or higher than 9.0 or having properties capable of either causing damage to structures and equipment of the sanitary sewe system or sewage treatment plants or creating a hazard to per- sonnel engaged in operation and maintenance of such facilities. g. Any waters or wastes having objectionable color which is not removable by the existing waste treatment plant processes. h. Any waters or wastes containing contaminants of such character or in such quantity as will not be amenable to the waste treatment processes, or will injure or interfere with the waste treatment processes, or will constitute a hazard to humans or animals, or will create a hazard in the stream or water- course receiving the effluent from the waste treatment plant. i. Any noxious or malodorous gas, or any substance which, when introduced into a reducing environment, could cause the evolution of a noxious or malodorous gas. j. Any storm water, surface water, ground water, roof run off, subsurface drainage, uncontaminated cooling water, or un- polluted industrial process waters. k. Any radioactive isotope in concentration greater than that permitted by applicable federal regulations. 1. Any ceramic glazing waste in excess of concentrations present in normal domestic sewage. M. Any lime, calcium sulphate or other similar sludges in excess of concentrations present in normal domestic sewage. n. Any other waters or wastes containing suspended solids or solutions of such character or quantity that unusual atten- tion or expense would be required in the handling of such waste materials at the waste treatment plant. Section 20-36. Conditions on discharge of certain types of wastes. No person shall discharge any of the following types of wastes into the sanitary sewer system without having fulfilled the conditions hereinafter stated in each instance: a. Packinghouse waste: All hair_, bristles, hides or parts of hides, bones, animal parts, paunch manure, and viscera, stock feeds, grit, sand and straw in excess of concentrations present in normal domestic sewage, and all grease in excess of 100 parts per million shall be removed prior to discharge. b. Poultry processing waste: All feathers, parts of birds bones, grit, sand, poultry feeds, and viscera in excess of con- centrations present in normal domestic sewage, and all grease in excess of 100 parts per million shall be removed prior to discharge. Materials used in construction of waste lines from poultry processing establishment to connection with the sanitary sewer system shall be of a type which is not likely to induce the formation and growth of bacterial protein masses. C. Textile wastes: All lint, thread, pieces -of cloth, and yarn in excess of concentrations present in normal domestic sewage shall be removed prior to discharge. Kierinq and acid boiling wastes shall be cooled, neutralized and stabilized with- in the limits specified in X20-35. Bleachery waste shall be cooled, neutralized and stabilized within the limits specified in S20-35. Sulfur dyeing wastes shall not be admitted to the sanitary sewer system. d. Metal Salts (iron, Copper, Zinc, Nickel, Chromium, Cadmiun, Lead, Etc.): Salts of iron, copper, zinc, nickel, chromium, lead or other heavy metals in excess of concentrations present in normal domestic sewage shall be precipitated and re- moved from waste flow prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer system. Waste containing hexavalent chromium shall have chrom- ium reduced to the tri -valent state, precipitated and removed from the waste flow prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer system. e. Cyanides: Cyanides in the waste flow shall be com- pletely reduced to carbon dioxide and nitrogen prior to dis- charge to the sanitary sewer system. f. Phenol: Wastes containing phenol may be discharged to the sanitary sewer system only with a permit issued pursuant to 520-40. Before granting such permission the director of utili- ties shall require the person proposing to make such discharge to enter into an agreement with the county, whereby such person shall regulate, vary or maintain, the discharge or concentratio: of phenol in accordance with the requirements of the county. Section 20-37. Limitations on discharge of concentrated wastes. a. No person shall discharge wastes having a B.O.D. or suspended solids concentration in excess of 240 parts per mil- lion, defined as industrial wastes by §20-33(f), into the sani- tary sewer system without having first obtained a permit for such discharge as provided in 520-40. b. Discharge of wastes having a B.O.D. or suspended solids concentration in excess of 500 parts per million shall be per- mitted by the director of utilities only after review and approval by him with respect to the point of discharge into the sanitary sewer system and the dilution afforded by other waste flows occurring in the system at such point. C. Discharge of wastes having a B.O.D. concentration in excess of 800 parts per million or a suspended solids concen- tration in excess of 700 parts per million shall not be per- mitted, and is hereby prohibited. Section 20-38. Permits and agreements for non -conforming discharges. Notwithstanding the provisions of §520-34 through 20-37 any person may apply to the director_ of utilities for a permit under 520-40 to discharge waste into the sanitary sewer system, which is of an unusual or otherwise prohibited strength or character. Such permit shall be granted by the director only upon execution by such person of an agreement, setting forth the conditions, pretreatment or other limitations required to enable such wastes to be safely accepted into the system. Section 20-39. Rate and volume of discharge of industrial waste. Slug discharge or batch dumping of industrial waste is pro- hibited, Any person now discharging or proposing to discharge industrial waste into the sanitary sewer system shall provide, at his own expense, a holding tank or holding tanks from which such waste shall be discharged at a uniform rate of flow over a twenty-four hour period, The requirement for a holding tank shall be waived by the director of utilities provided that: (1) the total daily waste flow from the establishment of such person does not exceed 50,000 gallons and the maximum rate of discharge is not greater than 1/3 of the capacity (with respect to rate -of -flow) of the sewer receiving the waste, and provided further that the receiving sewer has capacity for handling the maximum rate of industrial waste discharge from the establish- ment plus the maximum rate of waste flow from other contributors in the area tributary to the receiving sewer; or (2) the maximuR rate of discharge from the establishment does not exceed 2.75 times the average rate of discharge as if taken over a twenty- four hour period, and such maximum rate of discharge is not greater than 1/3 of the capacity (with respect to rate -of -flow) of the sewer receiving the waste, and provided further that the receiving sewer has capacity for handling the maximum rate of industrial waste discharge from the establishment plus the max- imum rate of waste flow from other contributors in the area tributary to the receiving sewer; and in addition (3) the char- acter of the waste is such that pretreatment with attendant safety holding facilities is not required, and (4) in all other respects, the discharge of such waste is in full compliance with this article. Section 20-40 Permits for discharges; pretreatment; restric- tions. a. Any person now discharging, or desiring to discharge, industrial waste or pollutants into the sanitary sewer system shall make application for a permit to the Department of Util- ities. Such application shall include a complete chemical anal- ysis of the waste being discharged or proposed to be discharged, including_ concentration of B.O.D. and suspended solids contained therein. Such application shall also contain pertinent flow data, including rates and duration, a detailed description of the operation, and any other relevant information requested by the director of utilities. b. Notwithstanding the provisions of X20-36 and 20-40, should the waste or pollutants from such person's operation be found to be inadmissable into the sanitary sewer system because of objectionable character as defined by this article, because of concentration of elements or substances in excess of the limits established by this article, or because of flow charac- teristics incompatible with the best use of the receiving sewer, as set forth in this article, the director of utilities shall not approve a discharge of such waste or pollutants into the sanitary sewer system until such person has employed, at his own expense, such methods and processes of pretreatment and regulation of flow as will render the waste or pollutants ad- missable to the sanitary sewer system in accordance with this article. C. The methods and procedures of any pretreatment of in- dustrial waste or pollutants to be employed shall be reviewed and approved under the same procedure as stipulated for original application. d. The Department of Utilities will not specify, suggest, or recommend specific equipment, structures, or arrangements comprising any pretreatment processes, but will review any such plans on request of the applicant. e. Approval of discharge of industrial waste or pollutant: by any person will be given only on the basis of proven per- formance of pretreatment processes (if pretreatment should be required) . f. Approval given to any person for the discharge of in- dustrial waste or pollutants, whether pretreated or not, into the sanitary sewer system shall in no way relieve such person of the responsibility of full compliance with this article, within the limits established by such permit. Section 20-41. Procedures for application. a. Any person now discharging industrial waste or pollu- tants into the sanitary sewer system shall have 60 days from the effective date of adoption of this ordinance to submit an application for a permit as provided in §20-40. Thereafter, any person desiring to discharge industrial waste or ?pollutants into the sanitary sewer system shall, 60 days prior to any such discharge, submit such an application. M Lon b. Every application shall be reviewed by the director of utilities or his designee for approval or disapproval within 30 days of receipt. C. Upon notice of final disapproval of any permit applica- tion or upon notice of modification of any permit, any person now discharging or desiring to discharge, industrial waste or pollutants into the sanitary sewer system shall submit a schedule for compliance with this article. Such schedule for compliance will be reviewed by the director of utilities; and approval thereof will be determined based on the reasonableness of such schedule with regard to the relative cost, the degree of hazard to the integrity of the sanitary sewer system, and the public safety. Tn no case will the required time for full compliance with this article exceed three years. The director may require full compliance with this article before the appli- cant may begin to discharge or continue to discharge any indus- trial waste or pollutants into the sanitary sewer system when- ever the Department of Utilities finds that such discharge is likely to pose an immediate danger to the sanitary sewer system of the County or the health, safety and general welfare of the public. d. Upon .final approval of an application for a permit to discharge industrial waste or pollutants into the sanitary sewer system the director of utilities shall issue such permit. Section 20-42. Measurement of volume of industrial waste. The volume of industrial waste discharged by any person into the sanitary sewer system shall be measured by one or more of the following methods: a. If the volume of waste water produced by any person in his industrial or process operations is substantially the same as the volume of water purchased from the county, then the volume of water purchased shall be considered to be the volume of waste discharged. b. If, in the establishment of any person discharging in- dustrial waste into the sanitary sewer system, a substantial portion of the water purchased from the county is used for purposes resulting in normal domestic sewage, for cooling purposes, or for purposes that do not require the discharge of such used water to the sanitary sewer_ system, such person shall, at his own expense, either (1) install a meter of design approve, by the director of utilities or his designee on the water supply line to his industrial process operations or (2) install a meter of design approved by the director of utilities or his designee, on the waste line from such industrial process operations. The volume of water or waste flow, respectively, as measured through such meter shall be considered to be the volume of in- dustrial waste discharged into the sanitary sewer system. Such meters shall be capable of accurate measurement and recording of all rates of flow or other acceptable measurement to the extent deemed. necessary by the county. C. If any person now discharging or proposing to discharge industrial waste into the sanitary sewer system does not secure his entire water source from the county such person shall, at his own expense, install a meter of design approved by the dir- ector or his designee on the waste line from his industrial process operations. The volume of waste flow, as measured through such meter shall be considered to be the volume of waste discharged to the sanitary sewer system. S4ction 20-43. Access for measurements. a. Any person now discharging or proposing to discharge any industrial waste into the sanitary sewer system shall con- struct, at his own expense, a control manhole on the waste line from his industrial and process operations .for the purpose of facilitating observations, measurements, and sampling of the industrial waste discharge from such person's establishment. The control manhole shall be constructed in a suitable and satisfactory location downstream from any pretreatment facili- ties, holding tanks, or other approved works, and ahead of the point of discharge of such waste into the sanitary sewer system. The design of the control manhole shall be in accordance with the requirements established by the director of utilities or his designee. The control manhole shall be maintained by such person so as to be safe, accessible, and in proper operating condition at all times. b. Such requirement for a control manhole shall be waived by the director provided that: (1) the total daily waste flow from the establishment of such person does not exceed 50,000 gallons; and (2) the maximum rate of such discharge from'said establishment does not exceed 100 gallons per minute; and (3) access, means, and facilities are provided within such establishment for the purpose of observing, measuring, and sampling the waste flow from such establishment; and (4) the discharge of all waste from such establishment, is in all other respects, in full compliance with this article. Section 20-44. Determination of character and concentration -- of waste. a. The Department of Utilities shall make a periodic determination of the character and concentration of industrial waste or pollutants. b. Location and design of sampling sites for a periodic determination of the character and concentration of industrial waste or pollutants discharged into the sanitary sewer system shall be approved by the director of utilities. C. Samples of industrial waste or pollutants discharged into the sewer system shall be collected in such a manner as ma'. be deemed necessary by the director of utilities, and analyzed for compliance with this article. The laboratory methods used in the examination of said waste waters shall be those set fort] in the latest edition of "Standard Methods". d. Such determination of the character_ and concentration of the industrial waste or pollutants discharged into the sani- tary sewer system shall be binding as a basis for surcharges on those persons discharging industrial waste or pollutants into the system. . i 1i %woe, 140 e. Costs incident to sampling an(?. analyzing of waste or pollutants that are applicable to surcharges shall be added to t' -ie .surcharge provided for in 520--45 made to all per7,ons dis- charging is- charging industrial waste or pollutants into the county's sanitary system. Section 20-45. Cost recovery for treatment of industrial wastes In addition to the charges provided for in 5520-21.1 and 20-50, a strong waste surcharge for the higher cost of treating excessive strength waste or pollutants shall be rendered to any person discharging industrial waste or pollutants in accordance with the following formula: 62.4 V Surcharge = ((BOD -240) + (SS -240)) (1,000,000) ($0.04) BOD = Biochemical oxygen demand in parts per million of the industrial waste. SS = Suspended solids in parts per million of the indus- trial waste. V = Volume of the industrial waste in cubic feet. Such surcharges shall be shown separately on the regular bill rendered to the proper person by the director of utilities. Th- dischargers shall pay the surcharges in accordance with practices existing for payment of regular sewer charges. Section 20-46. Enforcement. a. In the event the director of utilities determines that a person required to obtain a permit for industrial waste dis- charge under the provisions of this article has failed to apply for such a permit, or that a person holding such a permit has violated the terms of his permit, or that any person has vio- lated or is violating any provisions of this article, he shall issue a compliance order requiring such person to abate such violation within thirty days of the date of the order. Such order shall be sent to such person at the address used. for his utility bills by certified mail, return receipt requested. In the event such person fails to comply with such order within the prescribed time period, the director shall suspend any dis- charge permit issued to such person, and shall terminate county water service to such person. b. Any person objecting to an order issued by the direc- tor of utilities under subsection (a) of this section shall have the right to appeal the same to a review committee comprised of three members of the Board of Supervisors appointed by the Chairman. rIotice of intention to exercise such right to appeal shall be filed in writing with the Clerk of the Board of Super- visors within the time specified for compliance in the direc- tor's order. Failure to file such notice within such time limit shall be deemed a waiver of the right to appeal. C. The review committee shall meet within thirty days of receipt of the notice of appeal and shall conduct a hearing on the objections raised by the appellant to the director's order. The appellant and the director shall each be afforded the oppor- tunity to present evidence and to cross examine the other's witnesses. The committee shall review the order of the direc- tor, with due regard .for the reasonableness of the same, the degree of hazard to the integrity of the sanitary sewer system, the immediacy of the threat to the public health and safety, and the possibility of long-term damage to the environment posed by such violation. Based upon such criteria the committe( a may affirm, modify, or vacate the director's order; provided that no such decision of the committee shall permit the continu- ance of a sewage discharge which does not conform to the stan- dards of this article without requiring full compliance with such standards within three years, as required by X20-41. d. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a) and (b) of this section, whenever the director determines that a person is discharging substances into the sanitary sewer system which pose a clear and present danger to life or property, the director shall immediately suspend any discharge permit issued to such person and shall discontinue county water service to such person. ARTICLE IV INDUSTRIAL COST RECOVERY Section 20-47. Definitions. As used in this article the following words and phrases shall have the meanings hereinafter ascribed to them, unless otherwise clearly required by the context: a. BOD or biochemical oxygen demand shall mean the quan- tity of oxygen utilized in the biochemical oxidation cf organic matter under standard laboratory procedure in five (5) days at 20°C, expressed in parts per million. The laboratory determin- ation shall be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in "Standard Methods". b. Domestic Sewage shall mean waterborne wastes normally discharging from the sanitary conveniences of dwellings (includ ing apartment houses and hotels), office buildings, factories and institutions, free from storm surface water and industrial wastes. C. Industrial Cost Recovery Period shall mean that period during which the Federal grant amount allocable to the treat- ment of wastes from industrial users of the system, a period of thirty years for each such grant assisted treatment works. d. Industrial User shall mean any non-governmental user of the sewer system, as defined in 40 CFR 35.905-8 and identi- fied in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1972, United States Office of Management and Budget, as amended and supplemented, under the following divisions: (1) Division A: Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing; (2) Division B: Mining; (3) Division D: Manufacturing; (4) Division E: Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, and Sanitary Services; and (5) Division I: Services. e. Industrial Wastes shall mean all waterborne solids, liquids or gaseous wastes resulting from any industrial, manu- facturing or food processing operation or process, or from the development of any natural resource, or any mixture of these with water or domestic sewage as distinct from normal domestic sewage. f_. Infiltration shall mean the water entering a sewer system, including sewer service connections, from the ground, through such means as, but not limited to, defective pipes, pipe joints, connections, or manhole walls. Infiltration does not include, and is distinguished from, inflow. %ve 140 g. Inflow shall mean the water discharged into a sewer system, including service connections from such sources as,. but not limited to, roof leaders, cellar, yard, and area drains, foundation drains, cooling water discharges, drains from springs and swampy areas, manhole covers, cross connections from storm sewers and combined sewers, catch basins, storm waters, surface run-off, street wash waters, or drainage. Inflow does not in- clude, and is distinguished from, infiltration. h. Major Industrial User shall mean an industrial user whose flow exceeds 50,000 gallons per day or whose known five- day biochemical oxygen demand or concentration of suspended solids exceeds 240 milligrams per liter of effluent discharged by such user into the sewer system. i. Minor Industrial User shall mean an industrial user which is not a major industrial user. j. Normal Domestic Sewage shall mean sewage in which con- centrations of suspended solids and five (5) -day 20°C BOD do not exceed 240 parts per million each by weight. k. Sewage shall mean a combination of water -carried waste from residences, business buildings, institutions, and indus- trial establishments, together with such ground, surface and storm waters as may be present. 1. Sewer shall mean a pipe or conduit used to collect and carry away sewage or storm water run off from the generating source to sewage treatment plants or receiving streams. M. Standard Methods shall mean the examination and analy- tical procedures set forth in the latest edition, at the time of analysis, of "Standard Methods' for the Examination of Water an( Wastewater" as prepared, approved, and published jointly by the A.W.W.A., W.P.C.F. and the American Public 'Health Association. n. Suspended Solids shall mean solids that either float on the surface of, or are in suspension in, water, sewage, or other liquids, and which are removable by laboratory filtering. Quantitative determination or suspended solids shall be made in accordance with procedures set forth in "Standard Methods". Section 20-48. Exclusions. a. An industrial user who would otherwise be subject to Industrial cost recovery shall be excluded from this article to the extent that: 1. The industrial user discharges only non -process segregated domestic wastes or wastes from sanitary conveniences; and. 2. The industrial user is not a significant user as defined in §35.925-12. b. Those industrial users which have reserved a portion o: an existing treatment works under contract or agreement execute) prior to March 1, 1_973 and which have paid a reasonable portion of the capital costs associated with that reserved capacity, as determined by the Regional Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, shall be excluded from parti- cipation in Industrial cost recovery, to the extent of the capa city so reserved. Section 20-49. Reserved Capacity Agreements After March 1, 1973. a. Reserved capacity agreements entered into after March 1, 1973 shall not exclude the industrial user from participa- tion in industrial cost recovery. The industrial user shall pay the full industrial cost recovery payments allocable to M n the capacity reserved, and, in the event that such an industrial user exceeds its reserved capacity, its full use shall be sub- ject to this article, unless otherwise excluded. b. Provided, however that, if the treatment works are expanded in the future with federal grant assistance, an in- dustrial user who has executed a reserved capacity agreement and has made industrial cost recovery payments based upon reserved capacity, will not incur additional industrial cost recovery charges associated with the cost of expansion until the industrial user's actual use of the treatment works exceeds its reserved capacity. C. Such industrial users shall, however, be required to pay any additional industrial cost recovery charges associated with the cost of upgrading a treatment works. Section 20-50. Computation of Industrial Cost Recovery Payments a. During the industrial cost recovery period, each indus- trial user shall pay its share of the total amount of Federal grant funds, including amendments to grants, which are alloca- ble to capacity used or committed for use in the treatment of wastes from industrial users. The payment for each industrial user shall be computed in accordance with the following formula which takes flow, five-day biochemical oxygen demand and the concentration of suspended solids into account as the primary factors which influence the cost of treatment works construc- tion: Industrial Cost Recovery Formula (Q-0 ) (BOD-BODn) (SS-SSSa ICR = [ ((Q -I*) x CQ* -I*) + ( (BOD* x CBOD*) + ( S- S*—" x CSS' P_ x R Where ICR = Cost to be recovered from an industrial user Q = Average daily wastewater flow contributed by the user durinc the billing period (gallons per day) Q = Average daily wastewater flow that is certified as primar- ily segregated domestic waste contributed by the user dur- ing the billing period (gallons per day) Q* = The average of the sum of certified hydraulic capacity existing in all grant assisted treatment works in the County system during the billing period (gallons per day) I* = The sum of hydraulic capacities existing in grant assisted County treatment plants that is allocable to design year ii filtration and inflow, as determined from grant documents (gallons per day) CQ* -I* =The average of the sum of the Federal grant costs allocable to the non-infiltration/inflow component of hydraulic capacity in all County treatment works durinc the billing period (dollars) BOD = The average daily poundage of five day biochemical oxygen demand contributed by a user during the billing period, calculated as Q x SBOD x 8.34, where 5 S = Most recent available BOD5 concentration of a user's BODS total waste stream as determined in conformance with §20-53 (parts per million) BODD = The average daily poundage of five-day biochemical oxyge: demand contributed by the primarily segregated domestic IM waste component of a user's waste stream during the bil- ling period, calculated as OD x SBOD x 8.34, where 5 SBOD - Most recentavailableBOD5 concentration of the domes - 5D tic component of a user's waste stream as determined in conformance with §§20-48 and 20-53 (parts per million) BOD* = The average of the sum of grant assisted design influent BODS capacity in all County treatment works during the billing period (pounds per day) CBOD* - The average of the sum of Federal grant costs allocable to BOD5 removal during the billing period (dollars) SS = The average daily poundage of suspended solids contributed by a user during the billing period, calculated. as Q x SSS x 8.34, where S = Most recent available suspended solids concentration of SS a user's total waste stream as determined in conformance with §20-53 (parts per million) SSD = The average daily poundage of suspended solids contributed by the primarily segregated domestic waste component of a user's waste stream during the billing period, calculated as QD x SSSD x 8.34, where SSS = Most recent available suspended solids concentration of D the domestic component of a user's waste stream as deter- mined in conformance with 9§20-48 and 20-53. SS* = The average of the sum of grant assisted design influent suspended solids capacity in all County treatment works during the billing period (pounds per day) CSS* = The average of the sum of Federal grant costs allocable to suspended solids removal during the billing period (dollars) P = Length of the billing period (in days) R = Length of the cost recovery period (in days) b. Any industrial user which discharges into the County system of wastewater treatment works shall be subject to this article, unless excluded, as provided above, and the industrial cost recovery charges for such user shall accrue from the date of the user's initial discharge into the County system or the effective date of this ordinance, whichever is later, and shall continue to accrue for the unexpired portion of the industrial cost recovery period or until the user ceases to use the County system, whichever occurs first. If an industrial user termin- ates, with the consent of the County, any agreement for reserves capacity which was executed after March 1, 1973, its payment fox industrial cost recovery shall cease, to the extent of the reserved capacity so terminated. C. If there is a substantial change in the strength, volume, or delivery flow rate characteristics introduced into the treatment works by an industrial user, such user's share shall be adjusted accordingly, when the County has made such a determination. d. If there is an expansion or upgrading of the treatment works, each existing industrial user's share shall be adjusted accordingly except that the expansion of capacity resulting from the correction or reduction of inflow and/or infiltration, shall not affect the user's industrial cost recovery share. e. An industrial user's share shall not include any por- tion of the grant amount allocable to capacity not used or reserved by such user. f. An industrial user's share shall not include an inter- est component. Section 20-51. Industrial Cost Recovery Billing. a. The first industrial cost recovery bills shall be issued to industrial users no later than ten (10) months from the effective date of this Ordinance. Thereafter, all indus- trial users shall be billed on their normal wastewater user charge billing dates at a constant charge per billing unless the amount is increased or decreased in accordance with this article. b. An industry may fulfill its cost recover obligation by making a lump sum payment for its entire share of the Federal grant. Such payments shall either by processed as a normal Industrial cost recovery payment or set aside in a sep- arate account to be drawn on annually .for the remainder of the cost recovery period. .Lump sum payments will not relieve an industry from the obligation of making additional future pay- ments should its waste flow or load increase. Discounts from the total cost recovery requirement will not be given to indus- tries making advanced Industrial cost recovery payments. Section 20-52. Disposition of Industrial Cost Recovery Revenue. a. All funds recovered during the annual accounting period, with the exception of the discretionary portion, shall be depos- ited in interest-bearing accounts which are fully collateralized by obligations of the United States Government or by obligations fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United States Government or any agency thereof. b. [within one year of the effective date of this Ordinanc', and thereafter at least annually and within four months after the close of the County's fiscal year, the County shall transfe by check payable to the United States Environmental Protection Agency fifty percent (50%) of all industrial cost recovery revenues collected during such fiscal year and any interest earned thereon. Forty percent (40%) of Any industrial costs recovered and all interest which has accrued on the said forty percent (40%) shall be placed in an industrial cost re- covery account entitled "Expansion and Upgrading Account". Funds in this Expansion and Upgrading Account shall be expended only i for replacement or expansion of grant -assisted treatment works.! The remaining ten percent (100) industrial cost recovery revenues shall be used to administer this Ordinance and for such other uses as the County shall deem proper, except for the construc- tion of industrial pre-treatment facilities or rebates to indus- trial users' cost incurred by such users in complying with Federal user charges or industrial cost recovery requirements. C. Prior to committing any of the funds retained for the construction of treatment works, the County shall obtain the approval of the Regional Administrator, which will be based upo a determination that the proposed use of the funds would be for7 eligible costs of a project for expansion and reconstruction ofI treatment works within the County's jurisdiction. The County shall provide a preliminary engineering report sufficiently detailed so as to permit a determination of eligibility, and an estimate of eligible costs. Section 20-53. Monitoring. a. All major industrial users shall be monitored at such times as the County may deem necessary, but at least annually. b. All minor industrial users, as defined herein, shall be monitored on a random basis, by Standard Industrial Classi- fication categories, as set forth in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1972, United States Office of Manage- ment and Budget, as amended and supplemented. The wastewater characteristics of each such category shall be reviewed not less frequently than annually. In the event that actual data is not feasibly available for a particular category, values of 240 milligrams per liter of five-day biochemical oxygen demand and 240 milligrams per liter of suspended solids shall be assigned to such category and the industrial users therein until actual data to the contrary is obtained. Section 20-54. Appeals. a. An industrial user or other aggrieved party may appeal to a Hearing Officer, who shall be appointed by the Director of Utilities, who may be an employee of the County, on the issues of (1) exclusion from the industrial cost recovery plan by rea- son of contract or the discharge of primarily segregated domes- tic wastes and/or (2) on the issue of the amount of the indus- trial cost recovery assessment with particular regard to flow, five-day biochemical oxygen demand, and the concentration of suspended solids. b. Any existing industrial user may apply within one year of the effective date of this article for exclusion from par- ticipation in the Industrial Cost Recovery ordinance on the bases provided above. New industrial users (those who connect to the County service system after the effective date of this i Plan) shall have one year from the date of their initial connec- tion in which to apply for exclusion. An Application for Exclu- sion shall include a schematic diagram of the user's production processes, waste pretreatment and a conveyance systems, and a series of waste strength tests in conformance with County accepted procedures and guidelines which shall be available on request, all such diagrams shall be certified as accurate by an entity 1 licensed in this state. All such test results shall be certified as .having been performed in accordance with County accepted pro- cedures and their accuracy shall be certified by a qualified chemist or laboratory located within the Commonwealth of Vir- ginia. C. Within 30 days after the mailing date of each indus- trial cost recovery bill, an industrial user who is included within this Plan may file an Application for Exclusion or an Application for Redetermination of Assessment with the Hearing Officer, but only in the event of a substantial change in qual- ity or quantity of effluent discharge by such user arising sub- sequent to the last redetermination. Such changes shall be certified by a qualified chemist or laboratory as having occur- red and such a chemist or laboratory shall also certify that tests indicating the substantial changes aforesaid were con- ducted in accordance with County accepted procedures. d. All applications shall set�fbrth the industrial user's name, and address along with a brief statement of the reasons it is petitioning and the factual basis for the Application. Applications shall set forth the names of the officers, attor- neys, employees, and witnesses who will be appearing before the Hearing Officer. Applications shall be filed with three copies and sent by registered mail to the Hearing Officer at the place for which payment of charges is specified in the industrial cost recovery bill from which the appeal is taken. e. Procedure. The Hearing Officer shall notify the Appli- cant by mail of the time and place for hearing, such notice to be given within 30 days after receipt of any application. The hearing shall be conducted on the Application not less than 10 days after mailing of such notice. The hearing shall be held as an informal consultation and conference at which the Appli- cant, in person or by counsel, shall present his argument, evi- dence, data, and proof in connection with the issues submitted. A representative from the County may then present its factual basis for the exclusion or assessment under consideration. The Hearing Officer shall not be bound by the usual rules of evidenc but may conduct the hearing in such a manner as in his judgment will expeditiously and accurately determine the substantial rights of the industrial user and the County. All hearings may be stenographically or electronically recorded. The Hearing Officer shall make findings of fact and recommendations which shall be submitted to the director of utilities for his deci- sion, the results of which shall be made known to the Applicant. f. No hearing shall be held and no decision shall be ren- dered by the County with respect to exclusions sought on the basis of reserved capacity contract executed prior to March 1, 1973. Upon receipt of an Application for Exclusion from indus- trial cost recovery on this ground, the County shall forward the request and appropriate documentation to the Regional Ad- ministrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agenc within thirty (30) days. The Regional Administrator will make his determination and the Petitioner will be notified by the County. Section 20-55. Penalties. a. Any person, firm or corporation who shall violate any provisions of this Ordinance or who shall fail to comply with any provision hereof shall be _guilty of a misdemenaor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine not to exceed $1,000. b. Failure to pay the ICR share for industrial waste dis- charges when due shall be sufficient cause to disconnect any and all services to the sewer mains of the County, and the same penalties and charges, now or hereafter provided for by this Chapter for failure to pay the bill for utility service when due, shall be applicable in like manner for failure to pay the ICR share. (2) That S§20-4, 20-5, 2 20-13, 20-15, 20-19, 20-26 ander of the Code of the County of Chesterfield are amended and reenacted as follows: Section 20-4. Same --County utilities department to supervise. The eeuatp-health utilities department shall have the general supervision over treatment of the public water supply with fluoride and-the-tttiiities-e7.epartmet provided, however, that the utilities department is directed to furnish to the health department copies of records specified under section 20 -- at daiI_y;-vaeekiy-aad-memth-lp such intervals as may be required by the county health department. Section 20-5. Same --Health department to make periodic reports to the board of supervisors. The county health department may make perieeie reports to the board of supervisors on the fluori dation of the public water supply and to seek the cooperation o educational and scientific institutions to conduct surveys and research as to the beneficial ef_fectx if-anyx of the program and-pre-'eet on the citizens of this the county. M Section 20-10. Water line extension requirements; costs, reimbursements. The board of supervisors will authorize the installation ofj water extensions to extend the county's water system at the expense of developers and refund to developers the total cost or part thereof, to the extent permitted by this section, out of connection charges made on said lines in accordance with the following policy: a. The county shall determine the feasibility of all requests for water extensions, and no extension will be made unless such extension is determined to be in the best interests of the county utility system and the health, safety and welfare of County residents. b. No water line extensions or installations shall be made without a contract with the county. Every such contract shall provide for the developer depositing the estimated cost of such extension with the county or supply the county with a copy of an accepted executed contract with an approved licensed utility contractor; the furnishing of all necessary rights of way by developer; title of such extension to vest in the county upon completion of the construction; and refund provisions to be null and void and of no effect if the county is prohibited from collecting connection charges and any such refund provi- sions provided shall be deemed separable from the remaining covenants, obligations and agreements and shall in no way affect the validity of the other provisions of the agreement. The county shall approve the size, type, location and material of all water mains and other facilities, and they shall be installed in accordance with county standards and specifications. All contractors installing such facilities shall be approved by the county. If private contractors install such facilities, cost of+ such installation shall, within thirty days of completion, be filed with the county. C. The entire cost, including the actual cost incurred and paid out by the county, plus a fixed overhead charge of fifteen percent of extending water mains shall be paid for by the person or persons making the extension when work is per- formed by county forces. When contract work is performed by an approved contractor, an inspection fee of two percent will be charged based on final actual cost. The estimated amount of such fee shall be deposited at the time the contract is executed The county will pay the difference in cost between an eight inch. main and a larger size main installed, except when it is deter- mined that a larger size main is needed to serve the property being developed. The difference in cost between the eight inch main and the larger main installed shall be the difference in material and labor cost, as determined by the county. i A separate service shall be required for each house, each unit of duplex homes or separate business establishments. Where one meter serves a trailer court, apartment or other property approved by the board, the county shall require a minimum water service charge for each unit served on said property. No more than one dwelling unit or business establishment may be connecte to a service line except those approved by the board upon proper application. i! IA - ,I i �I d. When water lines are installed at developer's cost, a I reduction of two hundred fifty dollars for each service connec- tion made within the subdivision shall be allowed. The reduction of two hundred fifty dollars for each service connection shall b( allowed when application is made for service. The reduction shall apply to any person making application to connect property located within the boundaries of said property covered by the extension contract. In a new subdivision, the developer shall ! pay the County to have water lines, meter yokes and meter boxes installed in all new subdivision streets after the road is con- structed to sub -grade and prior to the base course being placed.I The developer shall pay one hundred dollars for each connection at the time application is made for the service lines. When the meter is applied for, the balance due shall be paid in accordance with the county ordinance. When required, sewers shall be in- stalled prior to the installation of water mains and service lines. I e. Reimbursement of one hundred and fifty dollars for each service connection wittin the property being developed shall be made for water line extensions outside the development when the extension will also serve property between developer and source of water. This refund of one hundred and fifty dollars will apply to large size mains, over eight inches in size, installed within or without the developer's property when the county requires a larger main and does not have the capital to install the larger size main and the developer wishes to finance) the installation thereof. This cost shall be as determined by the county. No refund will be made for an extension of two hundred feet or less. When a refund is requested on an exten- sion, the developer shall furnish a plat of the tract of land to 'e developed showing boundaries, title to the property and such other information required by the county. The area to be covered in the refund must be appre�eel-by-the-l�earel-ef-sayer- visers contiguous to the water extension line and reasonably related to the proposed development of the area. In addition, the board of supervisors must approve the area to be covered in the refund. f . 6ahen-water-limes-are-installeel-�aitl�-eet�ntp-ft�rtels--tl�e eanneetian-ehdrge-far-e misting-hey+es-�ai�i-be-ree�t�eeel-by-ane i tndreel-€fifty-elellars-if-t!�e-eenneetien-is-applieel-far-�aitkin tklrty-elays-after-water-ser�iee-l�eeetes-a�ailal�le- A developer may be permitted to install all water service laterals in a subdivision for which he has deposited 5100.00 for each lateral if the developer furnishes all equipment and labor for the in- stallation of the service laterals, including corporation stops .1 -- nnrl anv nth P' copper tuo1nq, mew YUP, , i«�_, �L ----- , r ---- - - supplemental material necessary to meet County specifications. All materials shall be furnished by the County at the County Shop and Storage yard. The developer shall install service laterals for all lots on both sides of the street within the development. The County will reimburse the developer $40.00 for the installation of each service lateral. The developer shall render the County a bill upon completion of installation. The additional connection fee shall be payable to the County when the developer requests installation of the meter. g. Reimbursement to developers under all existing exten- sion policy contracts shall continue in effect and the reim- bursements to be paid as provided herein shall only apply to extensions made subsequent to April -J7-1436 the effective date of this ordinance. h. The developer shall be required to cut all streets and install water lines in all streets within a subdivision, unless specifically exempted by the county. i. All reimbursements due as provided in subsection (e) of this section shall be paid periodically to those entitled to be reimbursed in accordance with the provisions herein. j. The county will ordinarily install the service connec- tion and the meter at the same time, except as provided in subsection (d) of this section. Location of grades for top of meter box shall be furnished by applicant; it is agreed that if raising or lowering of meter is necessary after initial instal- lation, a charge of ten dollars will be paid. When it is neces- sary to raise or lower the water service, this work will be done at cost plus fifteen percent. Section 20-13. Termination of service for nonpayment of water charge; additional charges. If the bill for water charge shall remain unpaid for fif- teen days after becoming delinquent and written notice has been given to the user that water supply at the premises shall be discontinued, the supply of water to the premises shall be discontinued and such water supply shall not be restored until the delinquent account and a charge of five ten dollars for reconnecting the service has been paid in full to the treasurer of the county. Section 20-15. Water emergency --Authority of water committee. The water committee of the board of supervisors of the county is hereby authorized to declare emergencies in the county affecting the use of water in any area of the county during any period in which there is a water shortage and to control and restrict the use of water during an emergency in the County caused by a water shortage or other cause. Section 20-19. Compliance with article. No person shall install, alter or repair any connection intended to connect the sewerage facilities of any premises in the county with a system operated by the county until such per- son complies with the terms of this article. �Pi�is-artiele shali-net -Superseele-any -eentraetaal-agreements-Cit i-nsere-ef tl�e-sewerage-system-maele-drier-te-I�pril-�8; -1969- Section 20-26. Sewer connections --Ownership; responsibility. The ownership of connections between premises and main sewers, including those portions located within the rights of way of public or private streets, shall be vested in the owners of such premises. The county shall not be responsible for the operation and maintenance of such connec- tions. glee-l�earrl-ef-sr�per�isers-skall-net-lie-resgensible-fer tl�e-repair-ef-any-eenneetien-aniess-tl�e-�reeessity-fer-st�el� repair-can-l9e-preen-te-lie-ear�sPel-ley-er-te-haeme-]peen-eatzsPet by-tl°re-ir�pre�er-tnnetiening-a€-the -Main -sewer-ta-Whieh eanneeteel: Section 20-27. Same--Charges--Generally. Connection charges for sewage treatment in the county including the Ettrick Sanitary District shall be as follows: (a) Single family. (1) Existing residence, already having septic tank system when application is made within time allotted by county after notice that sewer service is available, six seven hundred and fifty dollars.; thereafter, twelve hundred dollars. (2) New residence whose service lateral is connected to sewer installed by developer, six seven hundred dollars.. (3) New residence whose service lateral is connected to sewer not installed by developer, twelve hundred dollars. (b) Duplexes. Same as single family residence for each unit in the duplex. (c) Mobile homes not located in a mobile home park or subdivision. Same as singiec (d) Churches. Same as single family residence. When churches are used for schools, kindergartens, etc., charges shall be based on equivalent single family units. (e) Apartments, condominiums and townhouses, mobile home parks and mobile home subdivisions. (1) Existing. When application is made within time allotted by county after notice is given that sewer service is available, six seven hundred and fifty dollars per unit; there- after, twelve hundred dollars per unit. (2) New. Six Seven hundred dollars installed by developer; twelve hundred dollars with county funds. per unit on lines'[ on lines installel (f) Travel trailer camps, hotels and motels. (1) Existing. When application is made within time allotted by county after notice is given that sewer service is available, two hundred dollars per unit; thereafter, _four hundred dollars per unit. (2) New. Four hundred dollars. (g) Commercial, industrial and institutional. (1) Existing. When application is made within time allotted by the county after notice is given that sewer service is available, twelve hundred dollars per acre with a minimum charge of six hundred dollars for each such establishment; thereafter, seventeen hundred fifty dollars per acre with a minimum charge of twelve hundred dollars for each such estab- lishment. (2) New. When sewer extension is made by developer, twelve hundred dollars per acre with a minimum charge of six hundred dollars for each such establishment. (3) New commercial connected to sewer not installed by the developer. Seventeen hundred fifty dollars per acre with a minimum charge of twelve hundred dollars. ,I f (h) Hospitals, nursing homes, or homes for adults. (1) Hospitals, three hundred dollars per bed. (2) Nursing homes, two hundred dollars per bed. (3) Homes for adults as defined in Section 63.1-172 of the Code of. Virginia, boarding houses and rooming houses, one hundred dollars per bed or the same as a single family residence; whichever is greater. n {r}--i�iseel�aneens---Dnp-eend�tiee-ret-eevered-e ewe-er enp-speeiei-eenditien-she��-be-�ee�etiated- 3) That 5§20-9, 20-20 and 20-21 are hereby repealed. (� ) i - , �,; �r,�; _„ �o ._.e nt X20 .LO.._ anal.. 2Il-2] shall j be e .f f e -c -ti. ve _ oii---aTrd- -a�fte-r- July 1--1977. (�) That shall be effective on and after Thursday, Ap-ri-1 28-, 1977. V,