The URL can be used to link to this page

07-27-77 PacketCOMP. FOtUrA 5- . . -, u 000 M SETS ~'"l:/~C A T E (N~e and add~ ~ S~ ~ ~iv~ SOLD VIRGINIA DIVISION OF ~RESTR~ To P.O. BOX 3758 I · ~ "Tr~surer of c~sterfleld '~ BY c/o ~. F. Cus~rd,: S~te Forester P.O. ~ox C~rlottesvil le, Virginia I INVOICE Purchase Order,~ Requisition No, Date of Invoice How Shipped ' ~rm 1977 Terms end Discount ' NOTICE TO VENDOR Ail invoices s~;nst agencies of the Commonwealth of Virginh must be prepared on this form tad four copies sent directly to the agency to which me~ch~mllse w~s shipped oz Jot which service was rendered. Invoices must be completed ia deuil. Render a ~epavate invoice for e~ch puxchsse o~det promptly upon completion o! ship- ment, or pc:fortunate of service. Retain l~t copy for your recorcts. If cha:ges for freight or express are added m invoice, original bill of haling or receipt must be am~c. hed. DATE OF SHIPMENT OR SERVICE--, I I DESCRIPTION OF ARTICLES OR SERVICES One fourth gross proceedsfrom the lands of. the Pocahontas Forest: In, . Chesterfield County In accordance with.the provision of Chapter' q, Article' i, Section 10-3, Sub-Section'5 of the Vlrglnla Code. ~ DO NOT BEND OR FOLD 56ao96 WT. NO, UNITED ¥IR6INIA. BANK RICIIMOND, YIRGINI& No. 4 "n, EPT. ^CT. I,"°" I { PAY TO THE ORDER OF: Tg'EAS OF CHEsTERF:I'EL'D CO COMMONWEALTH OF 'VIRGINIA RICIiMONI), VIRGINIA QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT MO. DAY YR, L7 0? 77 11514099 68--2 AMOUN! $~$a35,77 TREASURER OF VIRGINIA ,:o s io,,,og.o.y,: LO,,,oo oq~.,~,:~ '; LEAVE BLANK The encl,)sed check is in payment of the account as stated above. Any errors should be brought promptly to the attention of the State Treas- urer P. O. Bc~x 6 H., Richmond 15, Va. and this check returned with the statement. An endorsed check constitutes evidence of payment: no · further receipt is required. Pocahontas Chief Fiscal Officer July 27, 1977 Chesterfield County Forestry Programs~ Virginia Division of Forestry Land Area Total land area of County. 306,400 acres TOtal privately-owned forest land 213,200 .acres Personnel 1. One full time Chief Forest Warden 2. One full time Forester Equipment 1. One John Deere 350 crawler tractor with fire plow and transport truck; stationed at Pocahontas State Forest Headquarters. 2. Hand tools at the 13 fire stations A. Fire rakes - 120 B. Backpack tanks - water -70 Fire 1. Reporting period January 1, 1976 to December. 31, 1976 2. Forest Fires 25 Acres 163~ 3. Field & grass 254 Acres 25 4. Suppression cost A. Cases 8 B. Percentage of total forest fires 32% 5. Causes by percent for District ~2 w Lightning Campfire Smoking Debris burning Incendiary State of Virginia Number forest fires Number acres burned Fires over 100 acres Fires over 200 acres .5 Equipment .8 Railroads 18.2 Children 20.1 Miscellaneous 13.'9 2,479 11,741 9 0 1.9 21.9 17.9 5.2 -2- Cooperation We have received excellent assistance from Chesterfield County Fire Chief Robert ~Eanes, his staff officers and fire fighter in our fire suppression, fire investigation and fire prevention work in Chesterfield County. Forester Larry Edwards and Chief Forest Warden Frank Hancock has established a good working relationship with County Fire Organization.' I also offer a word of praise to Chester- field Chief of Police land his officers for their able assistance when needed. Forestry Relations 1. Fire prevention programs We have presented a 30 minute Smokey the Bear Fire Preven- tion Program ts all the pupils in ~the elementary schools. Also assisted CheSterfield Fire Prevention in numerous programs at the shopping centers during fire prevention week in October. 2. Career Day Presented programs Forestry to the High School and Middle School students. Forest Management Period January 1, 1977 ~to date Assistance to landowners A. Landowners 92 B. Acres examined 2791 C. Management Reports 39 D. Reforestation for forest products Ee Landowners Seedlings planted Acres planted Wildlife and erosion Landowners Seedlings planted 18 668,000 loblolly 955 33~ 21,000 C. Crockett Morris, Jr. Assistant District Forester Virginia Division of Forestry PROPOSED ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE to vacate and abandon streets, alleys, avenues and boulevards situate in "Home Acres" Subdivision, Bermuda Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown on a plat or plan thereof duly of record in the Clerk's office of the Circuit Court of said county in Plat Book 4 at Pages 96 and 97. WHEREAS, Luther M. Hill and Heppie R Hill have petitioned ' !ith:e Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, to 'ivacate and abandon certain streets, alleys, avenues and boulevards iisituate in "Home Acres", Bermuda Magisterial District, Chesterfiel~ !ICounty, Virginia, as more particularly shown on a plat duly of iirecord in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of said County iin Plat Book 4 at Pages 96 and 97, which streets, alleys, Avenues, ~iand boulevards petitioned to be vacated are as follows, to-wit: ~:The alley between Lots 2 and 3, Block 16; the alley between Lots 1 and 2 and 3 and 4, Block 17; the alley between Lots 1 and 4, Block 18. except the E. 20' thereOf; the alley between Lots 2 and 3, Block 25; the alley between Lots 1 and 2 and 3 and 4, Block 24; the alley between Lots 1 and 4, Block 23, except the E. 20'thereof Bermuda AvenUe from the W. side of Lot 3, Block 16 and Lot 2 Block 25 extended in an E. direction to a point 20' W. of the E. side of Lot 4, Block 18 and Lot 1, Block 23; Helipore Boulevard from the W. side of Lot 3, Block 25 and Lot 27, Block 2, extended in an E. direction to a point 20' W. from the E. side of Lot 4, Block 23 iland Lot 1, Block 29; York Street from the S. side of Lot 2, Block !127 and Lot 1, Block 28, eXtended in a N. direction to the N. side ~of Lot 2, Block 16 and Lot 1, Block 17; Dover Street from the S. side of Lot 2, Block 28 and Lot 1, Block 29, extended in a N. direction to the N. side of Lot 2, Block 17 and Lot 1, Block 18, all as more particularly shown on a plat hereto attached marked in red. WHEREAS, notice of the adoption of this ordinance has been given in accordance with 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950 as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGNIA: 1. That pursuant to 15.1-482 of the Code of Virginia of 1~50 as amended, the aforesaid portions of alleys, streets, avenue~ and boulevards be and the same are hereby vacated and abandoned as part of the street system of the County of Chesterfield and~he Commonwealth of Virginia. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accordance with 15.1-482 (b) of the Code of Virginia of 1950 as amended and a certified copy thereof shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Chesterfiel~ Virginia, ~ sooner than 30 days hereafter with the name of County of Chesterfield as grantor and Luther M. Hill and Heppie R. Hill as grantees A Copy: Teste NICHOLAS M. MEISZER, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AN ORDINANCE to vacate the 20 foot easement for ingress and egress along the sideline which divides Lot 5 and 6, Block C, Section A, Lake Crystal Farms Subdivision, 10 feet of which is on Lot 5 and 10 feet of which is on Lot 6; said lots are more fully shown in Plat Book 12, Page 44, Clerk's Office, Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia. WHEREAS, LONNIE H. PIERCE and DIANNE M. PIERCE, and LEON H. LLOYD and DELORES J. LLOYD, owners of the property in question, have petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia , to vacate the 20 foot easement for ingress and egress along the sideline which divides Lot 5 and 6, Block C, Section A, Lake Crystal Farms Subdivision, 10 feet of which is on Lot $ and 10 feet of which is on Lot 6; said lots are more fully shown in Plat Book 12, Page 44, recorded in the Circuit Court Clerk's Office, Chesterfield County, Virginia, and notice that the Board of Supervisors would consider the adoption of an ordinance vacating said easement having been given in accordance with Section 15.1-431, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia. That pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, that the 20 foot easement for ingress and egress along the side line which divides Lots 5 and 6, Block C, Section A of Lake Crystal Farms Subdivision, 10 feet of which is on Lot 5 and 10 feet of which is on Lot 6; said lots being more fully shown in Plat Book 12 , Page 44, recorded in the Clerk's Office, Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, is hereby vacated. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accordance ~ith Section 15.1-482 (b) Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and a certified copy thereof shall be recorded no sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, and tshall be indexed in the names of the County of Chesterfield as grantors and LONNIE H. PIERCE and DIANNE M. PIERCE and LEON H. LLOYD and DELORES J. LLOYD as grantees. Copy Teste - ~icholas M. Meiszer, County Administrator AN ORDINANCE to vacate that portion of Observation Avenue east of Wentworth Street as shown on a plat of Bensley Village, recorded in Deed Book 288, Page 186, in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia. WHEREAS, Philip Atwood Stillman, and Emma Norine Stillman are 'own.ers of lots 4, 5 and 6, Block K, Village of Bensley in the "Bermuda Magisterial District of Chesterfield County and have pe- ~,~titioned the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia ~to vacate a road of 40 foot width and 150 foot length known as Observation Avenue east of .Wentworth Street as shown on a plat of iBensley Village, Deed Book 288, Page 186, the recorded in i Circuit Court Clerk's Office, Chesterfield County, Virginia, and notice that the Board of Supervisors would consider the adoption an ordinance vacating said road having been given in accordance' with Section 15.1-431, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended: NOW THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors ~of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia. That pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b), Code of Virginia, -1950, as amended, a road of 40 foot width and 150 feet in length known as Observation Avenue 'east of Wentworth Street as shown on a plat of Bensley Village and recorded in Deed Book 288, Page 186, in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, is hereby vacated and no longer necessary for public use That the effect of this ordinance to vacate Observation Avenue [ shall be to reinvest title to the road in the abutting landowners to the center of said avenue. ,i This ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accord- ance with Section 15. Chesterfield County, Virginia not sooner than thirty days here- after and shall be indexed in the names of the County of Chesterfield as grantor and Philip Atwood Stillman,· Emma Norine Stillman and Paul Hauff, Ruth Hauff and the County of Chesterfield as grantees. Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd, I~AP Showing Subdivision of a part of Block "K" of the VILLAGE OF BENSLEY Bermuda District Chesterfield Co. va. Scale 1"-!00~ July 2, 1921 W. W. Laprads & Bros. Civil ~ngineera & Surveyors Richmond, Virginia Note: Reference is hereby made to the map of the Vitlaoe of Bensley m~de by Atlantic Coas~ Realty Co. and da~ed ~,~ay 1920 cn which Block "K" is s~.~ bein~ Office oF the Circuit Court celled Teste: UTILITIES DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JULY 27, 1977 Approval of water contracts: W77-63D Developer: Contractor: Harvest Hill Brandermill R. M. C. Contractors, Inc. Recommend approval $18,187.25 Clover Hill W77-65D Smoke Tree Off-site $49,227.00 Developer: Chesterfield Land and Timber Corporation Contractor: R. M. C. Contractors, Inc. Midlothian Recommend approval W77-48CD Tremont $91,198.20 Developer: Tremont Corporation Contractor: Stamie E. Lyttle Co., Inc. County Cost: $25,400.00 Code: 366-11684-8071 Refund through connections 366-11684-8070 Cash Refund Dale Recon~end approval with refund through connections W77-66CD Smoke Tree On-site $86,068.00 Developer: Chesterfield Land and Timber Corporation Contractor: R. M. C. Contractors, Inc. County Cost: $28~574.00 Code: 366-11684-8071 Midlothian Recommend approval Reconsider fire protection for Airport Industrial Park. Dale Reconsider petition for water line extension to serve Chester- field Manor Subdivision. Estimated Cost: $57,450.00 31 Connections Bermuda Recommend denial Agenda - Utilities Department Page 2 July 27, 1977 Discussion of replacement of water lines in Matoaca area. Estimated Cost: $60,000 Matoaca Award of Water Contract W77-42C, Carriage Hill-Otterdale, to Fred W. Barnes Construction Company, Incorporated. Midlothian VI. ~VII. Award of Water Contract W76-77C, Woodpecker Road, to Piedmont Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $24,788.00. Base bid ........................ $24,788.00 10% Contingencies ............... 2,478.80 Estimate cost ................... $27,266.80 Code: 380-61000-2340 Matoaca Approval of sewer contracts: /1. S77-47D Patterson Park-Resubdivision of Lots 22-35, Block E, Section B $22,433.30 Developer: C. W. Hunnicutt and C. Winfrey Rudolph Contractor: Bookman Construction Company ~' Clover Hill Recommend approval /2. S77-44D Shady Creek, Section 2 $50,966.25 Developer: Realty Industries, Inc. Contractor: Stamie E. Lyttle Company, Inc. Dale Recommend approval S77-45D Rollingwood Estates Apartments, Phase II, B & C $20,675.30 Developer: Realty Industries, Inc. Contrac'tor: Van Doren Brothers, Inc. Clover Hill Recommend approval S77-52D Smoke Tree Outfall $85,717.80 Developer: Chesterfield Land and Timber Corporation Contractor: R. M. C. Contractors, Inc. Midlothian Recommend approva~ Agenda - Utilities Department Page 3 July 27, 1977 JVIII. /5. S77-46CD Briarcliff, Section A, $44,545.00 Phase II Developer: Realty Industries, Inc. Contractor: Stamie E. Lyttle Company, Inc. County Cost: $2,045.00 Code: 380-77000-8071 Clover Hill Recommend approval Reconsider request of William A. Johns of Bodie, Mills, Taylor and Puryear, Incorporated from the developer of Heritage Commons Subdivision for the County to assist in ~acquiring off-site easements. Midlothian Recommend approval .Re___~commend denial Consideration of request from Mr. & Mrs. J. H. Koogler, 12664 Winfree Street, for reduced sewer connection fee of $300.00. Bermuda Recommend denial Consideration of request from N. E. Weber, 12509 Brook Cane, for a reduced sewer connection fee of $300.00. Bermuda Recommend denial Consideration of request from Mrs. Loretta E. Lieser, 1540 North Mount Bella Road, for reduced sewer connection fee of $300.00.. Midlothian Recommend denial School Board concerning sewer connection fee for 'the high school on Krause Road. Dale Consideration of request from Mr. & Mrs. John V. Foreman, 12720 Percival Street~ for a reduced sewer connection fee of $300.00. Bermuda Reconsider letter of June 8, 1977 from Robert A. Lux of the Agenda - Utilities Department Page 4 July 27, 1977 ,,/XIV. Consideration of request from Wade M. Ogg, III, 12716 Richmond Street, for reduced sewer connection fee of $300.00. Bermuda Recommend denial v/XVI. XVII. / XVIII. XIX. Consideration of request from Robert E. Lawless, Jr., 12316 Petersburg Street, for reduced sewer connection fee of $3oo,oo. Bermuda Recommend denial Resolution to hire bond counsel to prepare options for sewer and water bond issues. Appoint a Swift Creek Watershed Committee as required under Section B, 2 (d) of the Environmental Impact Statement prepared by EPA. Consideration of an option from the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation for the purchase of County property at the Centralia Lagoon. Dale Consideration of an option from the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation for the purchase of County property at the Airport. Dale Vacation of a portion of Lake Drive. Clover Hill Vacation of streets and alleys in Home Acres. Bermuda Vacation of easement across Lots 5 & 6, Block C, Section A, Lake Crystal Farms. Clover Hill ~XXIII. Vacation of Observation Avenue. Dale p/XXIV. Miscellaneous UTILITIES DEPARTmeNT COUNTY OF CI-h. STERr~ELD AGENDA FOR THE ~ETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. JULY 27, 1977 ITEM NO. I(1) Contract Number: W77-63D District: Location: BRANDERMILL - HARVEST HILL CLOVER HILL Developer: BRANDERMILL - A VA PARTNERSHIP Contractor: R.M.C. CONTRACTORS, INC. Cost: $ 18,187.25 Code: VICINITY SKETCH UTILITIES DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE ~ETiNG OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JULY 27, 1977 ITEM NO. I(2) Contract Number: W77-65D Location: SMOKE TREE OFF-SITE District: MIDLOTHIAN Developer: CHESTERFIELD LAND AND TIMBER COKPORAT%ON Contractor: R.M.C. CONTRACTORS~ INC. Cost: $49,227.00 Code: VICINITY SKETCH No refunds for over-size or off-site water .lines. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JULY 27, 1977 ITEM NO. I(3) Contract Number: W77-48CD Dis tr ict: DALE Location: TREMONT SUBDIVISION Developer: TREMONT CORPORATION Contractor: STAMIE E. LYTTLE .CO. ~ INC. Cost: Total Contract Cost: Estimated County Cost: Estimated Developer Cost: Code: $91,198.20 $25,400.00 $65,798.20 366-11684-8071 Refund through connections -OR- 366-11684-8070 Cash refund Recommend approval of refund through connections SEE ATTACHED VICINITY SKETCH I TREEMONT, INC. P. 0. Box 550 CHESTER, VA. 23831 JULY 21, ')977 DIRECTOR OF UTILITY DEPARTMENT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY,i VA., 23832 DEAR ~iRS= WE FEEL THAT A CASH REIMBURSEMENT I8 Iff ORDER TO TREEMONT9 INCo FOR OFFSlTE WATER LINE A8 WELL A8 OVERSIZE WATER LINE PIPE THAT WE ARE INSTALLING. OUR 00NTRACT WAS 81GNED WITH THE COUNTY STATING THAT WE WOULD AOCEPT REIMBURSEMENT THROUGH THE CONNECTION FEE8 ONLY TO EXPEDITE THE PAPER WORK. WE OERTAINLY FEEL THAT 1700 rT. FOR WATER LINE PIPE DRILLED UNDER THE PROPOSED RTo 288 SHOULD BE 00NalDERED AS OFFSITEe IF NEOESSARYt THIS WATER LINE WILL SERVE PROPERTY OWNER8 ALONG KINGSLAND RD.~ HOPKIN8 RD.s AS WELL AS TREEMONT. FOR THESE REASONS~ WE WOULD VERY MUCH APPREOIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION OF A 0ASH REIMBURSEMENT TO U8. THANK YOUr C. F. C/URRIN, dR. TR£AS.~ Go ~o MILES PRES. CFC/LSH UTILITIES DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JULY 27, 1977 ITEM NO. I(4) Contract Number: W77'66CD District: Midlothian Location: SMOKE TREE ON-SITE Developer: CHESTERFIELD LAND AND TIMBER CORPORATION Contractor: R.M.C. CONTRACTORS: INC. Cost: Estimated Total Contract Cost Estimated County Cost (through connections) $86,068,00 $28,574.00 $57,494.00 Estimated Developer Cost Code: 366-11684-8071 VICINITY SKETCH ' <~,~ ..,J~./~ ~ ~ · I/¢- ¢¢~k,~ .,¢~' ///A /f 2' UTILITIES DEPARTi'.[ENT COUNTY OF CItn~SimR3IELD ...... · AGENDA FOR THE b[EETIUG OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS July 27, 1977 Item No. II Discussion of fire protection for Airport Industrial Park. District: Dale ESTIbtATED COST ALONG CENTRALIA ROAD 5540' of 16" water line @ $20/ft. = $110,800.00 150' Bore @ $70/ft. = $ 1o~5oo.0o Total Project Cost = $121,300.00 ESTIMATED COST ALONG ROUTE 10 9500' of 16" water line @ $20/ft. ! =$190,000.00 - CH ~ST E-p.. 0 ~) UTILITIES DEPARTb~NT CO~TY OF CHESTER~IELD AGENDA FOR THE I~ETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JULY 27, 1977 Item No. III Des cr ipt ion: Consideration of petition for water line extension to serve Chesterfield Manor Subdivision District: Bermuda RECOMMEND DENIAL Estimated Cost: 31 connections $57,450.00 Project Name: Chesterfield Manor' Estimated Water Main Cost: Estimated Meter Installation Cost: Total Estimated Cost of Project: 31 Connection fees @ $500.00 each = Total County Expenditures = Interest for 1 year @ 6% = ESTIMATED MONTHLY REVENUE Average Monthly Water Bill (8000 Gal/month)= Water Production Cost ($0.22/1000 Gallons) = Other Operating Costs = Debt Service ($0.085/1000 Gallons) = Anticipated Monthly Revenue Per Connection = ANTICIPATED ANNUAL REVENUE 31 connections x $2.61 per month x 12 = $52,800.00 4,650.00 $57,450.00 $15~500.00 $41,950.00 $ 2,517.00 $8.62 1.67 $6.95 3.66 $3.29 0.68 $2.61 $970.92 ~" UT%LITIES DEPAR2%IENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD ,AGENDA FOR THE 1,~ETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JULY 27, 1977 Itqm No. IV Descr ipt ion: Discussion of replacement of water lines in Matoaca ar ea District: Matoaca b5kTOACA AREA WATER LINE REPLACEMENT Estimated Cost - $60,000 LOCATION_ MATOACA,. APPOMATTOX RIVER VICINITY SKETCH UTILITIES DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE ~ETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JULY 27, 1977 Item No. V Description: Award Contract W77-42C, Water Mains for Carriage Hill and Otterdale, to Fred W. Barnes Construction Co., Inc. 8" Water Lines to Otterdale Base Bid Bores Total Bid 10% Contingencies Est. Total Contract Cost $136,666.35 10,962.00 $147,628.35 14~762.83 $162,391.18 12" Water Line to Otterdale Base Bid Bores Total.Bid 10% Contingencies Est. Total Contract Cost Code: 380-61000-2340 $157,991.60 11~250.00 $169,241.60~ 16~924.16 $186,165.76~ District: Midlothian UTILITIES DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JULY 27, 1977 Item No. VI Description: Cost: Award Contract W76-77C, Water Mains for Woodpecker Rd., Piedmont Construction Co. Base Bid 10% Contingencies Est. Total Contract Cost $24,788.00 2,478~80 -$27,266.s0 Code: 380-61000-2340 District: Matoaca UTILITIES D~E PARTi*~NT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE I'~ETING OF THE BOAP2) OF SUPERVISORS ~T~,~,~ NO. V~ (1) Contract Number: S77-47D District: Bermuda Location: Patterson Park-Resubdivision Lots 22-35~Blk. E-Sec.B Developer: C.W. Hunnicutt and C. Winfrey Rudolpb Contractor: Bookman Construction Company Cost: $22~4~B,~D Code: UTILITIES DEPARTmeNT COUHTY OF CHESTERFIELD · . AGEi[DA FOR THE i~'iEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ITEM NO. VII(2) Contract Number: S77-44D Location: Shady Creek - District: Dale Section 2 Developer: Realty Industries: Inc. ContraCtor: Stamie E. Lyttle Company, Inc. Cost: $50~.966.25 Code: UTILITIES D%PARTiv~NT COU~ ~ OF CHESTERFIELD AGEi~DA FOR THE I~[EETIi',~G OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS NO. VII( ) Contract Number: S77-4~D_ District: Clover Hill Location: Rollingwood Estates Apartments - Phrase II: B & g Developer: Realty Industries, Inc. Contractor: Van Doren Brothers, Inc. Cost: $20~675.30 Code: ROLLINGWOOD ESTATES APTS. PHASE I) B ~ C UTILITIES DEPARTiYPEUT COUNTY OF CHESTEKFIELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ITEM ,,0. VII(4) Contract Number: S77-52D Location: Smoke Tree - Outfall District: Mid lothian Developer: Contractor: Chesterfield Land & Timber Corporation R.M.C. Contractors, Inc. Cost: Sgs~717.gO Code: ! ! RD. UTIL].IIE5 DE?ART~'~NT AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD 0F SUPERVISOKS - ITEM NO. VII(5) Contract Number: Location: S77-46CD District: Clover Hill Briarcliff - Section "A", Phase II Developer: __ Contractor: Total Realty Industries, Inc. Stamie E. Lyttle Company, Inc. Cost: $44,545.00 Code: 380-77000-8071 County's Cost: $2:045.00 SECT ]CX '~", UTILITIES D EPAR~,[ENT COUN%~f OF CtIESTERFIELD AGEh~DA FOR ~-tE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS July 27, 1977 ITEM NO: VIII Request from the Developer of Heritage Corn_nons subdivision for the County to assist in acquiring off-site sewer and drainage easements. This request was presented to the Board on June 20, 1977 and" deferred at the request of the Department of Coz_nunity Development because of drainage problems. These problems have been resolved and we recommend approval of the request provided the Developer pays the cost of acquiring the easements. District: Midlothian HERITAGE COMMONS VICINITY MAP UTILITIES .DEPARTMENT COUNTY. OF CHESTERFIELD AGEI~A FOR 'i~HE biEETiNG OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Consideration of a request from Mr. Robert Lux regarding the sewer connection fee for the Bird High School on Krause Road. The property consists'of 75.78 acres and the Utility DePartment has billed the School Board for the connection fee based on the entire acreage. Mr. Lux advises that the School Board would normally purchase approximately 50 acres for the school but acreage is being developed in conjunction with the Department of Recreation. Mr. Ritz advises that the State would be 24 acres._ requirement for this school We recommend that the School Board invoice be changed to 50 acres at $1,200.00 or $60,000.00 and that General Fund pay the connection fee for~the remaining 25.78 acres'in the amount of $30,936.00. District: Dale UTILITIES DEPARTb~NT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS July 27, 1977 ITEM NO. X Request from Mr. & Mrs. John V. Foreman, who lives at 12720 Percival Street, for an old $300.00 sanitary sewer connection fee. Mr. & Mrs. Foreman advises they did sign and mail a contract to us. According to our records, a sewer agreement was sent to Mr. & Mrs. Foreman, but our records show no response. Recommend~ Denial. See the attached l~tter. District: Bermuda UTILITIES DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGEN~DA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS July 27, 1977 ITEM NO. XI Request frOm Mrs. Alice H. Koogler who lives at 12664 Winfree Street, for an old $300.00 sanitary sewer connection fee. According to our records, we mailed a sanitary sewer agreement to Mr. & Mrs. Koogler in October, 1974 but received no response. Mrs. Koogler advises she never received a contract. Recommend Denial. See attached letter. District: Bermuda UTILITIES DEPARtmENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE bfEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS .July 27, 1977 ITEM NO: XII Request from Mr. N. E. Web~r, 12509 Brook Lane for a $300.00 Sewer Connection. Mr. Weber states that he is sure he signed the survey contract with a notation that he did not desire sewer service at this time but if the sewers are installed he would connect when service is available. District: Bermuda Recommend denial ITEM NO. XIII UTILITIES D. EPARTMENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS July 27, 1977 Request from Mrs. Loretta E. Lieser, who lives at 1540 N. Mount Bella Road, Bon Air, Virginia, for an old $300.00 sanitary sewer connec- tion fee. According to our Right-of-Way Department, in acquiring the sewer easement across Mrs. Lieser's property, the sewer line was shifted upon her request at a location that would destroy most of her septic tank drain fields Our records show and as she indicates in her letter that she was aware of the rate changes but took no action to sign a committ- ment. Since the sewer line goes through Mrs. Lieser's drain field, it was necessary for her to apply and connect immediately. Mrs. Lieser forwarded her check for $300.00 for the sewer connection with the understanding that the fee will be adjusted as necessary depending on the charge set be the Board. Recommend Denial. See Attached Letter. District: Midlothian · / Chesterfield County l-LJ P. Ii. '~b ChesterSield, Y~rginia %~:,,, '"U~ enclosed please find my check for the sum of S300.00. This sum is being paid to have a permit issued to connect the in coming sewer t/ne to my propert~ in Crestwood Farms at 1540 N. Bells Rd., Boa Air, Va, At this tiaa there is a discrepancy over the amount I am to pal/ fo,~ this connection. Because my drain field will be interru~d at the time the mard~.ole I am to connect to will be installed, I do not at this time have the time to prove out why I should not pay a figure~ I just received Friday~ for the sum of ~?50.00 to connect. In c.hecking.by phone calls last week I had been given this information. In February~ 1971~ it was related back to me £riday, I ms to have received a paper to sign if I wanted the sewer line to come through and connected to this property. Therefore the sum of $300.00 would be the saount I would have to pay. Being this information of fora I ms told, a~as sent bi/ mail and assumed I received it and etc. i~ the ca~e in fact. In February 1971, I ~sa w/dow of thpee aonths, in the hospital fop ~upgepy and had thpee young children in ~ cape to finish rea~ing. I do not recall any papers at that tiaing about sewer line. My first recollection of such a line ~as finding ag property had been crisped and ~ked off fop a proposed l ine, gapdens mepe stepped into and no pegapd fop ay past labors om pp. opeptU mepe~ fpom mU point of uiem~ laker 8epiously om peapeeted. The:could of been 1~72 om 1973, I infop~ed the county at that time I did not mind the semep line mU pmoPePtU~ but I asked fop a dia,'spent pouts. Jt mhich lime il agpeed by the countU to take mU auggested pouts. At that time I informed the sewer line ~s to come through in July 1974, At ~hi~ time I was a~so toZd if w~ couid not agree on expensed for the remova~ and replacement of trees and scrubs and etc. my property wou~d be condemned and the county ~outd bring through the lgne dr./me would ~ett~e later. Needless to sqy, our leg of the s~er t in~ in Cr~stwood Farms did no~ eoae through in 19F4 and now that the rates have gone ap, and it ~e are asked to pay the change, due to no fault of ours. My neighbor ~id ~00.00 for connection and I feel that is all I too should pay as melt as the people who since bought properties a/nee all the tal~ of ae~er ca~e into Crestwood Farms. My choice suggestion of change in th~ crossing of th~ line on my property ~s based mainly on the facts that in the easement of ~6 feet, plus working easement, seven fully grown tre~s to say nothing of ~aller trees and scrubs. gardens and ihs like would be interrupted or removed compared to three treea and lesser a~ount~ in the area for the line to be removed. I will not deny I also kne~ ~g suggested and accepted choice of the line meant a Zessep span. fop me to connect and aisc a ~essop interruption of the ecology as hail of the Zinc mitt cross my driuemay and parking area on mY PPOpepty~ hopefutiy Zeauing the enui~o~ent ies8 disturbed, UTILITIES DEPARTbfENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS July 27, 1977 ITEM NO. XIV Request from Mr. Wade M. Ogg, who lives at 12716 Richmond street, Chester, Lot no ~336, Block X, Chester Subdivision for the old $3.00.00 sanitary sewer connection fee. Mr. Ogg advises in bis letter that in February, 1976, he was told be.would be given the $300.00 rate. In February, 1976 there was a moratorium put on the collecting of connection fees, therefore Mr. Ogg would not have been entitled to the old $300.00 rate. Recommend Denia 1. See Attached Letter. District: Bermuda July 5, 1977 Mr. Bill Wright Utilities Department County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Wright: As per our conversation, please have the sewer service con- nection rate for 12716 Richmond Street, Lot Number 336, Block Number X, Subdivision Chester, corrected from $750.00 to $300.00. I moved into this residence after the County Survey was made and, therefore, had not signed a commitment for sewer. My neighbors told me about the Survey and I called your office in February, 1976 to make a commitment. I was told, at that time, that it was unnecessary for me to sign a commitment, but that I would be given the prevailing rate of $300.00. The Contract for Sewer and Sewer Service connegtion has a charge of $750.00, which is not the rate I was quoted or the rate charged to my neighbors. I thank you for your having this corrected and am sorry for the inconvenience. Sinc~r~ely, Wade bl. Ogg WMO:ls Enclosure UTILITIES DEPARTMENT COUN'I% OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS July 27, 1977 ITEM NO. XV Request from Mr. Robert E. Lawless, Jr. who lives at 12316 Petersburg Street, for an old $300.00 sanitary, sewer connection fee~ because he was considering selling and overlooked returning the forms. According to our records, Mr. Lawless was sent the necessary sewer agreements but we bave no record of the agreement being returned. See attached letter. Recommend Denial. District: Be=n uda .ir, Robert A. Painter D~-' .... ~-~ of Utilities Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Fr, Painter, I am i~. reaeiot of a i~otiae about the sewer ao.~_~aeation ~et~mw.~ to my property o'a Petersbur~ Street. Prior to this -~,oti ce ~ received forms ~ ~r rel~t~n~ to whether -~ -~ ~ro~'~ ye office or not i intended using the se~/[er facilities once available, At the time that i received, the intent forms ~,.~e were en- gaged in mal:ing a decision as to whether :Ce ~4ou].d sell the property or ..'~ake major improve_uez'~.ts, fully i.u'be~zdiztg to sig:a the intent forms if we decided, on the impro'~emen'bs. Zowever, there ~as a ~erJ. od of '~ -~' ~ · ~ .. lilO. leisio:~, before ~,.~e ~.eczdao. on the imp!~ve::zents, and it must have been during this period of indicision that I overlooked the sewer intent forms. .... ~ ....... o about t~e current co~_~aation fee, I am advised it has risen frown the original ]~300.00 to .~:,~0.00 seems an excessively hif,jh penalty for this over- szonv. ~e have lived here for the past ten years as la?~ abiding, tax~.,.~,a~,-~__,~ citizens ~,~ith ...',~o children of school age, have co~- tributed to all services, and so far, have not had to avol. 11 ourselves of any benefits. Due to the above, ! stronrj!y feel that we should have the i:rivi!ege of rite original assessment fee. Jr. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS July 27~ 1977 ITEM ~XVIII SUBJECT: Consideration of an option from the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation for the purchase of County property for Route 288 at the Centralia Lagoon, in Dale · District. The Highway Department has offered $ 13,225.00 for the following take: 5.23 Ac~ in Fee Simple 0.06 Aci in Drainage Easement. We recommend that this offer be refused and a counter-offer made as follows: 5.23 Ac @ $3~099/Ac. ~30(Drainag~e .06 Ac @ 31900/Ac.x Easement) = $ 15,690 54 $ 15,744 (See attached Plat) I ,I I I UTILITIES DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS July 27, 1977 ITEM ~XIX Subject: Consideration of an option from the Virginia Department of Highways and Transporation to purchase land at County Airport for Route 288 in Dale District. The Highway Department has offered to purchase 11.95~ acres of land in fee simple, 0.26± acres as a permanent Drainage Easement. 0.66± acres additional gas line easement over that area to be abandoned. Total offer for these items is $ 103, 121.00. We recommend that this offer be rejected and the Board authorize us to study the matter further to determine a counter offer to be made to the Highway Department for the purchase of this land. ~' (See attached Plat) / /' / /' / / / / / / / / / ./ / ~ /I ×" /.' / UTILITIES DEPARTmeNT COUNTY OF CHESTEP~IELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS July 27, 1977 ITEM NO: XX SUBJECT: Vacation of a portion of Lake Drive; Clover Hill District. We have received a petition from Surreywood Land Corporation requesting the vacation of a portion of Lake Drive as shown on the attached plat. This has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended provided the area is retained for a Drainage and Utilities Easement. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS July 27, 1977 ITEM NO: XXI SUBJECT: Vacation of streets and alleys in Home Acres; Bermuda District We have received a petition from Luther M. Hill and Heppie R. Hill, husband and wife, ' ~ requesting the vacation of certain streets and alleys in Home Acres as shown on the attached plat. This has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOA~RD OF SUPERVISORS July 27, 1977 ITEM NO: XXII SUBJECT: Vacation of easement across Lots 5 and 6, Block C, Section A, Lake Crystal Farms; Clover Hill District. We have received a petition from Lonnie H. and Dianne M. Pierce and Leon H. and Delores J. Lloyd requesting the vacation of a 20' easement of ingress and egress across their lots in Lake Crystal Farms. This has been reviewed by staff and it is recommended by Community Development that the easement be retained for public access to the lake and ingress and egress to the dam. UTILITIES DEPART~,!ENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR~THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS July 27, 1977 ITEM NO: XXIII SUBJECT: Vacation of Observation Ave., Dale District. we have received a petition from P. A. Stillman requesting the vacation of Observation Avenue. This has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. RICHMOND NE~ SPAPERS. Publisher of THE RICHMOND NEWS LEADER JUL 2 0 197/ Richmond, Va ..................................... LEGAL NOTICE This is to certify that the attached ............ : .................................. was published in The Richmond News Leader, a newspaper pub- lished in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia. JUL 1 3 1977 JUL 2 0 1977 JUL 1 ~ 1977 The first insertion being ~ven ............. .~. ........................................... ] Sworn to and.~qbsc, r. ibed before me [ /,; I ......... N~tary Public !/ ~ [ State of Virginia, City of Richmond: ~0~[~[LL ~ART[ My commission expires .~2/26/~0 U~.E~V~$0~..~?~,'~j~ ....................... _U~-_ ~ [.~.__ TrI'LE AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OE THE ~)UNTY OF C~ESTERFIELD, 1~ AS AMENDED, BY ADDING ARTICLE IV TO CI .~'ER 17 CON- TAINING SECTIONS 17-28 AND 17-29 RELATING TO THE VACATION OF STREETS, ALLEYS, ROADS EASEMENTS, PUBLIC WAYS, PLATS OR PORTIONS THEREOF ·. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield CO unty: ~ .';' .:~.- (1) That Chapter 17 of the Code of the County of Chester- field is amended by addling.Article IV containing Sections 17-28 and 17-29 as follows: Article IV. Vacation of Streets, Alleys.~. Roads',' Easements, Public Ways, Plats or Portions Thereof. Sec. 17-2 8. Application. Each application to vacate a street, alley, road, easement,I public way, plat or portion thereof pursuant to section 15.1-481 or 15.1-482 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, shall be submitted to the Right of Way Engineer in the Chesterfield County Department of Utilities for administrative review prior to submission to the Board of Supervisors. Such application shall be made on forms provided for that purpose by the Right of Way Engineer. Such application shall be accompanied by all documents required by section 15.1-481 or 15.1-482 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Sec. 17-29. Fees. In addition to the estimated cost of advertising the notice of the public hearing to consider the ordinance to vacate, the applicant shall pay to the County an application processing fee of fifty dollars for each application submitted pursuant to section 15.1-482 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE ~ETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS July 27, 1977 ITEM NO. Contract Number: Location: Developer: Contractor: S77-38CD District: Midlothian Heritage Commons - Section A & Off-Site American Heritage Land Company Ward & Stancil, Inc. Total Cost: $69:174.00 County Cost: $10~357.74 ,-- Co~e: 380-77000-8071 HER COMMONS VICINITY MA I' UTILITIES DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS July 27, 1977 ITEM NO. ~ XXIV (1) SUBJECT: Consideration of the counter-offer from the Attorney for Joseph M. & Martha Mae Smith for an easement for the Bailey Bridge Force Main in Clover Hill District- Contract ~S73-28T. The Attorney for Joseph M. and Martha Mae Smith'has made a counter-offer in the amount of $10,000.00 to our offer of $1,350.61 for. a. Sewer Easement across their property at 10630 Genito Road. The total acreage involved in the easement is 1.7 acres and an appraisal was made in the amount of our offer. It appears that this counter-offer is excessive and we recommend denial by the Board. If this offer is denied, we request that the Board"Wuthorize us to hire a certified appraiser to make an appraisal for the condemnation case. UTILITIES ~EPART~NT COUNTY O~ CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FORT HE b~ETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JUly 27, 1977 IR~M NO. ~ntract Number: S77'12CD Lo~ion: Kings Forest - Section 1 II~.veloper: Kings Forest Limited ~ontrmctor: Hawkins & Dettor, Inc. District: Dale Tm_ta 1 ~t: $, 110. =.867.40 County's Cost: $6043.50 Code: 380-77000-8071 i A~'; ORDINA/{CE TO A~LEND THE CODE OF ~E COUNTY OF C~IESTERFIELD, 1975, AS ~24ENDED, BY AMEND- i~G SECTION 20-22 AND ADDING SECTIONS 20-13.1 AND 20-13.2 RELATING TO RESPONSIBLE PARTIES FOR SEWER ~D ~ATER CHARGES A~JD LI~S O.~ REAL ESTATE FOR UNPAID WATE9 CHARGES BF. IT ORDAIn;ED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 20-22 of the Code of the County of C%~e~terfield~ 1975, as amended, is amended an~ reenacted as fo 1 lows: S~c. ~20-22. ~_arges .for. sewer service a lien on real estate served, ...... ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ The charges made for sewer service, pursuant to this article, if unpaid shall be a lien on the real estate served by such sewer amM-ehe-ewae~-e~-m~=h provided, however, that the tenant or resident of such premises shall 5e li~ie"'for ~-the If the ~wme~ tenant or resident of such property fails to pay the charges ma~e~-f0~'~'~ew~r ~ce, they shall be collected by the treasurer of the county in the same manner as taxes ~nd levies are collected. {2) That Sections 20-13.1 and 20-13.2 are added to t~he Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1975, as amended, as follows: Sec. 20-13.1. .. ~Ch. aries for water service a lien on real estate ..... served. ....... ~,. , ................. The made for Water service, to this estate served b If the tenant or resident of such fails to the treasurer county same manner as taxes Sec. 20-13.2. Delinquent water taxes or charges to be docketed. If taxes or in the co~ treasure r made for water or the use thereof to the to ~e ~ame LAW OFFICES Mc G~w.,WooD~ & Ross BUILDING RI c ]~[O1VD) v~r I 1~ (~ 1 l~Iak CABLE ADDI~ess McWo BAT TELEPHONE (804) 644-413l July 8, 1977 C~'~,~'I'.OT'rE~vI]~L~, ~fIROINIA 0~FIC1~ COURT SOEARI~ ]~UILDIN(~ TELEPHONE {804) 977-E500 Mr. C. G. Manuel, Acting County Administrator Chesterfield County Courthouse Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Re: George W. Moore v. County of Chesterfield Dear Mr. Manuel: I enjoyed talking with you today regarding your efforts in placing before the Board a request for reimbursement for damage to a trailer owned by George W. Moore, a resident of Chesterfield County. As I indicated on the telephone, the July 27th date is suitable to me for an appearance before the Board, but should you later decide that another date is more convenient to the Board, please be assured that that is fine as well. Very truly yours, McGUIRE, WOODS & BATTLE Richard Cullen RC/gt LAW OFFICES GUI:RE,WOODS ~: BATTLE ROSS BUILDING CABLE ADDRESS McWo BAT TELEPHONE (804) 644-4{3I June 22, 1977 Mr. C. G. Manuel, Acting County Administrator Chesterfield County Courthouse Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Re: George. W..Moore v. County of Chesterfield Dear Mr. Manuel: On April 27, 1977, employees of the Environmental Energy Department of Chesterfield County were clearing brush and cutting trees as part of sewer construction on the property adjacent to the home of George W. Moore, 2621 General Boule- vard. During the cutting operation and as the direct result of negligence on the part of the same county employees, the tree was cut and made to fall onto a trailer owned by Mr. Moore causing damage of at least $340.98. Although the employees involved and the Department of. General Services through Mr. Ed James do not dispute that the County was at fault in the occurrence, the County Attorney has taken the position that the County is immune from liability. As I am certain you are aware, § 15.1-547 of the Virginia Code Annotated provides that the Board of Supervisors may, either by recorded vote or resolution, approve claims for monetary relief where valid and not unjust -- sovereign im- munity notwithstanding. Please accept this letter as a formal claim for repayment by Chesterfield County for damage caused by its employees to the aforementioned personal property by one of its residents, George W. Moore, who had been compensated by his insurance carrier which our firm is representing by way of subrogation. You will note a copy of the repair estimate is attached. Of this amount $340.98 was paid. Mr. C. G. Manuel June 22, 1977 Page Two I hope you will be able to talk with Ed James regarding this matter and would appreciate your scheduling the request for payment at a time convenient to the Board of Supervisors. In addition, please advise me if it would be appropriate for counsel to appear. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions on this matter. Sincerely, McGUIRE, WOODS & BATTLE Richard Cullen RC/gt Enclosure SHO ',~ 'LOCATION: :%'~(,~51 Ilull Street Road Richmond, Va. 23234 °'- " ' EDS Qeorge './. ~,Ioore (].'*O-BOx377z ' ~9,9503/276.~12 ., ~X~E (23234)C 2~26 C. eneral' Blvd. ~ ity 276~204 ' ADDRESS ~71--1 q 2~ ~HON'~ N~. ' BUILDING REPAIR ESTIMATE MATERIAL. LABOR UNIT GRAND QDANTI'TY UNIT D E $ C R I P 3" I O N UNIT -AMOUNT UNIT A~OUNT COeoT TOT .. ' Danmge, left side' ~_.pc' %~n±te a..~mS.numl top} 22" x ~0'~ ,. ~ 40,00 .... 1 ~9~ Ts~ '" cen~er ' , 2~}" x 10~. ; 1 40.00 1 pc, g,~5~e " bog~om~ 5G" .x 10~ 1 60,00 1 10~'. ~,~sq., screws ~d sealers 1 12,50 160.50 + ~ Sales Tsx ' 6.42 166.9 ~ ~b or: . , ......... To' remove and replace me%al .. ,. s%de sheets .... 8 hr: 15,00 120.0 ..... :-- Fre~gh~ ~d cra~ing for metal frOm Wash~ngtonv~lle~ ................ Ohio,~ 65.0 · _Char.~e for..¢rep,~nE .... · ___ (See Invoice NO,. 1736) ~ 35.0 .- (;~ID ~O~L ~ 386.9 COLOAIEL J. E. PITT#AN, JR. CHIEF OF POLICE COUNTY OF CheSTE RFI CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA POLICE DEPARTMENT July 18, 1977 MAJOR C. E. RICHTER ELD The Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, VA 23832 Dear Board Members: The Alcohol Safety Action Program is requesting that Chesterfield County Police participate in a selective enforcement program. This program would call for assignment of patrol officers on weekends to patrol for "drunk drivers". Officers assigned to this duty would be off-duty officers, and would be paid time and a half by the County. The County in turn would bill the "John Tyler Alcohol Safety Action Program" for funds expended. A contract would have to be signed between the County and "JTASAP". Also, arrangements would need to be made to set up a separate account within the police department budget for this purpose, and monies in the amount of $7,388 appropriated to this account. A system of billing and receiving monies back into this aCcount from John Tyler Alcohol Safety Action Program would also need to be set up. If the Board agrees to enter into this program, I respect- fully reauest the attached contract be signed and monies appropriated. Respectfully, ~/Colonel J. E. Pittman, Jr. Chief of Police JEPj r/vh IF THIS MATTER IS APPROVED.~ THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION SHOULD BE PASSED.~ IN ADDITION TO THE CONTRACT BEING SIGNED, The John Tyler Alcohol Safety Action Program agrees to reimburse the Chesterfield County Police Department for the cost of selective enforcement hours to increase Driving Under the Influence apprehension, John Tyler ASAP will reimburse approximately 20 days after receipt of voucher form to the John Tyler Community College Business Office. The hours of selective enforcement will be Friday and/or Saturdays for a period of 52 weekends, ending June 24, 1978, but the total reimbursement will not exceed 832 hours at a cost of $6,240. The Chesterfield County Police Department agrees to select appropriate officers and hours to maximize the DUI arrest rate, The Police Department will pay the officers selected for this program at customary rates and bill the John Tyler Alcohol Safety Action Program according to the aforementioned procedure. Officers participating must have attended the eight hour "DUI Counter- measures" course given by John Tyler Community College before reimbursement can be made. This agreement can be cancelled by either party by 15 days written notice and in any event will terminate if funds from Highway Safety Division grant number AL76-947-033-2 are ceased. John Tyler Alcohol Safety Action Program Date John Tyler Community College Date Virginia Department of Date Community Colleges VII, A,1, AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT ARTICLE VII, STAGE C OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1975, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO SIGNING OF SUBDIVISION PLATS BY THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Article VII, Stage C of the Subdivision Ordinance of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1975, as amended, is amended and reenacted as follows: STAGE C. Recorded Plat Upon receipt of a certified copy of the approved final plat, and upon signature and seal by the secretary to the Planning Commission of the plat to be recorded, the SUBDIVIDER files one ~me~-p~ transparency (photographic positive polyester film) with the She~e~e~d-~M Chief Building ~s~e~z$-8~ee Official and one transparency (photographic positive polyester film) with the Environmental Engineering Bepa~mem~-~-~he.~e~e~-~n~ Division. The approved final plat shall be recorded within twelve months of the date of tentative approval, and within ninety days of the date of approval by the See~e~y-a~-P~a~-B~e~ Secretary. After recorda- tion, the SUBDIVIDER proceeds to develop and sell the lots of his subdivision. VII ,^,2, AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT §9 ~ 2~2 OF THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1975, AS ~ENDED, RELATING TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR A SECOND PUBLIC ROAD ACCESS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That §9.2~-2 of the Subdivision Ordinance of the Code of the County of Chesterfield~ 1975~ as amended~ is amended and reenacted as follows: §9.2-2 Arranlg~ment~ Ail streets shall be properly integrated and coor- dinated with existing streets, and the proposed system of streets within and contiguous to the subdivision, and dedicated rights-of-way as estab- lished on the General Plan of the County of Chesterfield, as amended, Ail thoroughfares shall be properly related to special traffic generators such as industries, business districts, schools, churches, and shopping centers; to population densities; and to the pat- tern of existing and proposed land-uses. Local streets shall be laid out to conform as much as possible to the topography, to discourage use by through traffic, to permit efficient drainage and utility systems and to require the minimum number of streets necessary to provide convenient and safe access to property. The rigid rectangular gridiron street pattern need not necessarily be adhered to, and the use of curvilinear streets, cul-de-sacs, or U-shaped streets shall be encouraged where such use will result in a more desirable layout. Proposed streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be subdivided, unless pre- vented by topography or other physical conditions, or unless in the opinion of the Planning Commission such extension is not necessary or desirable for the coordination of the layout of the subdivision with the existing layout or the most advantageous future development of adjacent tracts. In business and industrial developments the streets and other accessways shall be planned in connection with the grouping of buildings,, locations of rail facilities, and the provision of alleys, truck loading and maneuvering areas, and walks and park- ing areas so as to minimize conflict of movement between the various types of traffic, including pedestrian. Ail subdivisions shall provide for a second public road access' prior to the recordation o~f any sub- division plat if the cumulative tot'al' of the lots in that' s~ubdivision' is in exCess of 59 'lots. In addition,~ the. County shall not issue more than 50 buildin'g p~rmit's in any subdivision until the sub- divider' or deVelOper .comp!e.tes construction of an 'approved 'second public road access. Ail subdivisions shall provide for a third public road a'CceSs prior ~to the' recordation o'f any sub- division plat~ if 'the cumul'ative' total of the lots in 'that~ s~bdivisi0n is in excess~ of '239 lots. In addition',~ the ~County shall not issue more than 200 b~i~ldin~' permit~'in any subdivision until ~the sub- divider or 'develoPer completes construction of an ~.proved third public road access. VII, s, &c, COU~T~ OF CH~TEE~IELD Int~'~cou~ty Cor~'espondence TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mike Ri tz R. M. McElfish /J'/~ Board Agenda · ~DATE: July 21, 19 77 Please have the following items placed on the next Board Agenda for Community Development: (1) State Road.Acceptance: a. Archwood (Clover Hill) b. Greenfield, Section I (Midlothian) lc. Settler's Landing, C-I' (Midlothian) (2) Litchfield Bluff (Brandermill) - save harmless agreements. COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD INTRACOUNTY CORRESPONDENCE July 25, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Nick Meiszer Lane Ramsey, Budge t Direc tor~2~02_. ~~ 1977-78 Budget Changes The Department of Community Development moved into new quarters in April 1977. No additional appropriation was required in t.he 1976-77 budget because of a surplus within that budget. The 1977-78 budget does not contain amounts for rent, telephone, electricity, trash collection, and a xerox machine. Please ask the Board of Supervisors on July 27, 1977 to take the following action: Suggested Resolution: On motion of , seconded by , it is hereby resolved that $26,220 be appropriated from the Unappropriated Surplus of the General Fund and that $38,000 be transferred from Planned Budget Expenditure 111-31620-2141 Rent Office Space as follows: 2140 2170 2070 3190 2990 Rent Telephone Electricity Xerox Trash Collection Total 111-11120 County Engineer 111-11131 Building Inspection 111-11142 Development Review 111-11143 Comprehensive Planning 111-11150 Drainage 111-11160 Street Signs $ 5,700 $ 2,340 $ 585 $ 900 $108 $ 9,633 11,400 4,680 1,170 1,800 216 19,266 12,600 5,200 1,300 2,000 360 21,460 6,400 2,600 650 1,000 - 10,650 380 156 40 59 - 635 1~520 624 156 240 36 .2.~576 $38,000 $15,600 $3,901 $5,999 $720 $64,220 And be it further resolved that Planned Budget Revenue account li1-00000-4222 Rent be increased by $8,250. Total Additional Appropriation Less Revenue Received $26,220 8,250 Net Additional Cost $17,970 LBR/lga cc: Mike Ritz COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD INTRACOUNTY CORRESPONDENCE July 25, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Nick Meiszer Lane RamseY, Budget Director~//~6~.~32 1977-78 Budget Changes The Department of Community Development moved into new quarters in April 1977. No additional appropriation was required in the 1976-77 budget because of a surplus within that budget. The 1977-78 budget does not contain amounts for rent, telephone, electricity, trash collection, and a xerox machine. Please ask the Board of Supervisors on July 27, 1977 to take the following action: Suggested Resolution: On motion of , seconded by , it is hereby resolved that $26,220 be appropriated from the Unappropriated Surplus of the General Fund and that $38,000 be transferred from Planned Budget Expenditure 111-31620-2141 Rent Office Space as follows: 2140 2170 2070 3190 2990 Total Rent Telephone Electricity Xerox Trash Collection 111-11120 County Engineer 111-11131 Building Inspection 111-11142 Development Review 111-11143 Comprehensive Planning 111-11150 Drainage 111-11160 Street Signs $ 5,700 $ 2,340 $ 585 $ 900 $108 $ 9,633 11,400 4,680 1,170 1,800 216 19,266 12,600 5,200 1,300 2,000 360 21,460 6,400 2,600 650 1,000 - 10,650 380 156 40 59 - 635 1,520 624 156 240.. 36 2,576 $38,000 $15,600 $3,901 $5,999 $720 $64,220 And be it further resolved that Planned Budget Revenue account 111-00000-4222 Rent be increased by $8,250. Total Additional Appropriation $26,220 Less Revenue Received 8~250 Net Additional Cost $17,970 LBR/lga cc: Mike Ritz TO: FROM: SUBJECT: COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD INTRACOUNTY CORRESPONDENCE July 25, 1977 Mr. Nick Meiszer Lane Rams ey, Budget Director~~ 1977-78 Budget Changes The Department of Community Development moved into new quarters in April 1977. No additional appropriation was required in the 1976-77 budget because of a surplus within that budget. The 1977-78 budget does not contain amounts for rent, telephone, electricity, trash collection, and a xerox machine. Please ask the Board of Supervisors on July 27, 1977 to take the following action: Suggested Resolution: On motion of , seconded by , it is hereby resolved that $26,220 be appropriated from the Unappropriated Surplus of the General Fund and that $38,000 be transferred from Planned Budget Expenditure 111-31620-2141 Rent Office Space as follows: 2140 2170 2070 3190 2990 Total Rent Telephone Electricity Xerox Trash Collection 111-11i20 County Engineer $ 5,700 $ 2,340 $ 585 $ 900 $108 $ 9,633 111-11131 Building Inspection 11,400 4,680 1,170 1,800 216 19,266 111-11142 Development Review 12,600 5,200 1,300 2,000 360 21,460 111-11143 Comprehensive Planning 6,400 2,600 650 1,000 - 10,650 111-11150 Drainage 380 156 40 59 - 635 111-11160 Street Signs ..i~520~ 624 156 240. 36 2~576 $38,000 $15,600 $3,901 $5,999 $720 $64,220 And~ be it further resolved that Planned Budget Revenue account 111-00000-4222 Rent be increased by $8,250. Total Additional Appropriation Less Revenue Received $26,220 8~250 Net Additional Cost $17,970 LBR/lga cc: Mike Ritz VIII,B, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD INTRACOUNTY CORRESPONDENCE July 21, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Nick Meiszer Lane B. Ramsey, Budget Directorcp~ 1977-78 Budget Changes Mr. Martin, Nursing Home Administrator, has requested that the Nursing Home Petty Cash Fund be changed from the name of J. E. Kennedy to Mr. Manton Kibler. Since Mr. Kibler is the Controller for the Nursing Home, I suggest this is a proper request. Please ask the Board of Supervisors on July 27, 1977 to take the above action. LBR/lga cc: Dean F. Martin COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD INTRACOUNTY CORRESPONDENCE July 21, 19 77 VIII,c, TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Nick Meiszer Lane B. Ramsey, Budget Director C~~ 1977-78 Budget Changes Attached is a request from Mr. Falconer, Real Estate Assessor,requesting funding for two authorized positions that will no longer be funded by CETA after August 31. The original budget was prepared on the basis of receiving continued funding from CETA. Suggested Resolution: On motion of , seconded by , it is hereby resolved that $19,218 be appropriated from the Unappropriated Surplus of the General Fund to Planned Budget Expenditure account 111-02200-1040 Appraisers. LBR/lga cc: Jim Falconer BOARO OF SUPERV SOF~S E MERLIN ONEILL CHA C L LEO MYERS COUNTY ADMINISTRATION M W BURNETT COUNTY AD MI N 151r RA 'l O~' C G MANUEL ASST COUNIry AD~41NI53RA1FOR LEE O FALWELL OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 July 1~, 1977 Mr. Lane Ramse¥ Central Accounting Dept. Chesterfield, Va. 23832 Dear Mr. R~msey: I hereby request two Appraiser I positions be added to the staff of the Real Estate Assessor at Grade 17 Step I. These positions have been 'funded thru July 31, 1977 and August 31, 1977 by CETA, not to exceed 24 months. It is necessary that funds be appropriated to Payroll Code 111 02200 1040 to continue the employment of the before mentioned positions. Resp~ectfully submitted: J%~es C. Falconer, Sr. Real Estate Assessor JcF/£c COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD INTRACOUNTY CORRESPONDENCE July 21, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Nick Meiszer Lane Ramsey ~ Budget Director Request for Change Fund The Director of the Mental Health-Mental Retardation programs has requested a $25.00 change fund be established for the Mental Health Clinic. This is needed to make change for clients wishing to pay at the clinic. Since all monies are deposited daily with the Treasurer, sometimes change cannot be made. Please ask the Board on July 27, 1977 to approve the change fund in the name of Mr. Morton Horwitz. LBR/lga cc: A1 Wynne VIII, E, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD INTRACOUNTY CORRESPONDENCE July 21, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Nick Meiszer Lane B. Ramsey~0 Budget Director 1977-78 Budget Changes The Building Official budget for 1977-78 contains no funding for part-time help. Mr. Wright has requeSted that the salary savings from hiring a plumbing inspector be transferred to be used for part-time clerical help. Please ask the Board on July 27, 1977 to take the following action. Suggested Resolution: On motion of , seconded by it is hereby resolved that $1,150 be transferred from Planned Budget EXpenditure Account 111-11134-1043 Plumbing Inspector to Planned Budget Expenditure Account 111-11131-1090 Clerical. LBR/lga cc: Mike Ritz J. P. Wright COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD INTRACOUNTY CORRESPONDENCE July 26, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Nick Meiszer Lane B. Ramsey, Budget D±rector~~ ~~ 1977-78 Budget Changes On June 13, 1977 the Board of Supervisors approved payment of Chesterfield County business tax for the new IBM computer. These funds were set up in the 1976-77 budget but will be paid out of the 1977-78 budget. Please ask the Board on July 27, 1977 to appropriate $2,301.00 to cover the cost of these taxes. Suggested Resolution: On motion of , seconded by , it is hereby resolved that $2,301 be appropriated from the Unappropriated Surplus of the General Fund to 737-01410-2990 Other Contractual Services to cover costs which were approved in 1976-77 but will be spent in 1977-78. LBR/lga cc: Elmer Hodge AKE NOTICE That the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, on Wednesday, July 27, 1977, beginning at 2:30 p.m., in the County Board Room at Chesterfield Courthouse, Virginia, will take under consideration the rezoning and the granting of Conditional Uses on the parcels of land describad herein. ~77S100 In Midlothian Magisterial District, MY . CAMPBELL requests an amendment to Condition %3 of a rezoning case (Case %76S047) to allow the use of the buffer area in an Office Business (0) District~n a 2.87 acre parcel, fronting 243.3 feet on Robious Road, fronting 559.1feet on Bon Air Road, located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of these roads. Tax Map 17-8 (1) 10 (Sheet 8). ~77S'034 In Matoaca Magisterial District, SUNSET HOME, INC. requests rez'0~ing from Community Business (B-2) to General Business (B-3). of a 0.86 acre parcel fronting approximately 125 feet on Chesterfield Avenue located approximately 90 feet northwest of its intersection with Boisseau Street, also fronting approximately 110 feet on Boisseau Street, located approximately 110 feet northeast of its intersection with Chesterfield Avenue. Tax Map 182-9 (10) 1, lB, lC, dE, Subdivision Boisseau, Blk 1, lots~l, lB, lC and 1E (Sheet 5~54. ~7S049 In Clover Bill and Midlothian Magisterial District, BRANDERMILL requests an amendment to a previously granted Conditional'Use for a planned Development (Case %74S021) to permi~ an additional Dublic road access from Old Hundred Landing Village to Hull Street Road. This request is on a 2443.53 acre parcel fronting approximately 8850 feet on Hull Street Road, approximately 7700 feet on the south line of Genito' Road and being located on the west line of Old Hundred Road between Genito Road and Hull Street Road. Tax Map 36 (1) 4; 46 (1) 23-1 & 32-1; 47 (1) 6, 8 & 9; 61-12 1 & 6; 61-16 (1) 5; and 62 (1) 20 (Sheets 13 & 20). ~0'91 In Matoaca Magisterial District, J. J. H. CORPORATION requests ~/rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7) & (R-9). of a 66.5 acre parcel fronting approximately 375 feet on Happy Hill Road, located approximately 400 feet northwest of its intersection with Jefferson Davis Highway. ' Tax Map 149-11 (1) 1 (Sheet 41).. /~'77S096 In Midlothian Magisterial District, OSCAR S. HASTINGS, JR. requests rezoning from Residential (R, 7) tO Cora~unity Business (B-2~ of a 0.81 acre parcel, fronting approximately 130 feet on Robious Road, ' fronting approximately 500 feet on Bon Air Road, located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of these roads. Tax Map 17-8 (1) 11 & 12 (Sheet 8). *This case was deferred by the Board of Supervisors at a previous meeting to their July 27, 1977 Meeting. 3~Sl19 In Clover Hill Magisterial District, EARL S. PATTERSON, SR. requests fezoning from Agricultuw'~l (A) to Residential (R-9~f a 168 acre parcel ronting 1051.7 feet on ailey Bridge Road, locate~ approximately 1200 feet north of its intersection with Claypoint Road. Tax Map 62-8 (1) 1 & 2, 62-11 (1)'-2 & 3 & 62-12 (1) 1. (Sheet 20). /77S120~' In Matoaca Magisterial District, EDWARD E. MORING & NORRIS E. JONES, JR. request rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-9) of a 10.5 acre parcel, fronting 65 feet on Swift Creek Lane, located- approximately 1500 feet southeast of its intersection with Branders Br~dge Road. Tax Map 163-13 (1) 13 (Sheet 49). ~~ In Midlothian Magisterial District, RICHARD F. BOZARD, et.als. request rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-40) of a 55 acre parcel fronting 637.32 feet on Winterfield Road, located approximately 1600 feet north of its intersection with Netherfield Drive. Tax Map 7-1 (1) 1 (Sheet 2). 77S122 In Bermuda Magisterial District, BERMUDA ASSOCIATES request rezoning from Agricultural (A) to General Business (B-3) of a 7.5 acre parcel fronting 23.96 feet on Jefferson Davis Highway, also fronting 678.43 feet on Loretto Avenue (unimproved) and located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of these roads. Tax Map 116-10 (1) 6 & 116-11 (1) 9 (Sheet 32). ~77S123 In Clover Hill Magisterial District, HARLEY S. HAMMOND requests rezoning from Agricultural (A) to General Business (B-3) of a 7.36 acre parcel fronting 514.71 feet on Hull Street Road, also fronting 25.73 feet on Baily Bridge Road and located in the northwest quadrant of the inter- section of these roads. Tax Map 48-16 (1) 8 (Sheet 13). ~77S124 In Dale Magisterial District, JOHN F. DAFFRON, OLIVER D. RUDY AND W. COURTNEY WELLS request rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Business Office (O) of a 0.12 acre parcel being located approximately 250 feet off the north line of Iron Bridge Road, measured from a point 300 feet west of the intersection of Iron Bridge Road and Krause Road, Adjacent to the Chester- field County Health Department building. Tax Map 95-8 (1) 15-1 (Sheet 31). ~77S126 In Midlothian Magisterial District, HUGUENOT COMMERCIAL PARK COMPANY requests an amendment to a Conditional Use for Planned Development to allow specific uses other than permitted uses in B-1 District, on a 100 foot p~rcel, on the ~southside of Allecingie Parkway, located 286.57 east of the intersection of Huguenot Road and Allecingie Parkway and being part of the Huguenot Commercial Park. Tax Map 8-16 (6) 1 & 2 Huguenot Commercial Park, Blk A, Sots 1 & 2 (Sheet 2). ~77S127 In Bermuda Magisterial District, W. THOMAS MAYS,~JR. requests a Conditional Use to permit the operation of a turkey shoot in an AgricUltural (A) District on a 67 acre parcel, located approximately 800 feet off the north line of West Hundred Road, measured from a point 1500 feet east of the intersection of West Hundred Road & Pine Bark Road. Tax Map 117-16 (1) 3 (Sheet 33). /7751'28 In Matoaca Magisterial District, ABRAM CARL MCDUFFIE ~requests a Conditional Use to permit a stock farm (to keep 2 horses) in a Residential (R-7) District on a 1.5 acre parcel, fronting 115 feet on Chinook Drive, located 200 feet south of its intersection with Hickory Road. 15308 Chinook Drive. Tax Map 171-4 (2) 4 Taylor Hall Estates, Sec. A, Blk A, Lot 4 (Sheet ~7). Copies of.~hese amendments are on file in the Depar~ent of Community Development, Development Review Division, 7714 Whi%epine Road, Airport Industrial Park, Chesterfield, VA, for public examination between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. of each regular business day. APPLICANT AND/OR AGENT MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARING Ail persons favoring or opposing the granting of %he above requests are invited to appear at the time and place herein stated. Stanley R. Balderson, Jr. Chief DiVision of Development Review APPLICANT: MYRA A. - CAMPBELL-, -.~_ REQUEST. & PROPOSED USE: An amendment~;-to Condition ~3 of .('Case $76S047)'to allow the use of the buffer .area'~ in an GENEP~AL LOCATION "~& 'TAW MAP' TDENTIF'ICATION: District, this parcel fronts along 'the 'northeast line 'of ~o~'~ and the northwest line of Bon Air Road and is 'located ~mmed~ately north of the intersection of the afor~entioned roads. Tax Map 17-8 (1) Parcel 1~ (Sheet 8). AC~GE, EXISTING ZONING, .EXISTING ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND' '{3SE:.~,iProperty. tc Residential {R-7) and is 'vacant~,~ ~P. roperty .~o' the considered"'fo~~ rezoning ~to ~c0mm~{tYi~usiness '~(B~2)~' ~and for ~ as a shopping center. PrOPert~'~.~o ~.the .south and'~southwest Business (B-2) and occupie~ by~arious co~ercial.-uses UTILITIES;'SOIL PROFILE, D~INAGE ~ EROSION, ~QUI~D OFFi EASE~NTS: _ This request-~i!l have no impact~on utilities, soil,, drain. PUBLIC FACILITIES: If the requ~st~?~s .approved, will,.'have impact on either existing ~or 'future area public'~fa~TitiesI T~NSPORTATION ~ T~FIC: This request Will'~ave no GENERAL PLAN: Single family, multiple family and commercial use~' .. "~j? '~ -REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant, who is representing Roger de la Burde, the property owner, requests an amendment to Condition #3 of a-rezoning case (Case #76S047) to allow the use of a buffer area in an Office Business (0) District. The Applicant requests that 25 feet of the buffer along the east and 20 feet along the north lot lines be used for parking, and that 10 feet of the buffer along the west property.. line be used for a paddle ball court. - .~.- c L ALTERNATIVES & MITIGATING.MEASURES: -On April. 28, 19~6, the~Board of Supervisors, upon recommenda, tion of the.Planning Commission approved the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Office Business (O)-of the subject parcel. In .approving this request, buffer strips along all property lines where imposed. The Applicant, in developing final site plans for the proposed use, has found that due to the intent of the development, it is difficult to maintain these buffers'and provide the required parking for office use. This above noted situation holds true for the required buffers along the east and north property line; however, the Applicant is also requesting that ten feet of the buffer along the west property line be used for a paddle ball court. Buffer strips are governed by Section 24.3-4 of the Zoning Ordinance and it is specified that such buffer strips, when required, shall not be used for any purpose other than enumerated in the Ordinance. One of these permitted uses allows recreational areas without structures. A structure is defined as "any- thing constructed or erected which has a permanent location on the ground or which is attached to something having a permanent location' on the ground". With respect to this defination, Staff is of the opinion that the proposed paddle ball court could not be constructed within the buffer are unless expressly permitted by amendment of the previously imposed buffer requirement. Given existing and probable future use of the adjacent property to the east, and the density of existing vegetation on the parcel, Staff is of the opinion that reducing the buffer along the north property line to 15 feet and along the east property line 10 feet, is reasonable and can be justified; however, because it was indicated that rezoning and office development of the subject parcel would constitute the limit of commercial expansion westwardly along the north side of Robious Road, Staff is of the opinion that the 35 foot buffer along the west property line should be maintained as originally required. Encroachment in this area, even for limited recreational use, is felt to be inappropriate. STAFF RECOStMENDATION: Staff would recommend that the Applicant be permitted to encroach upon the buffer strip alonq the north and east property to provide required parkinq only. The buffer along the north line may be reduced to not less than 15 feet and the buffer along the east property line may be reduced to not less than 10 feet. These reductions shall occur only for the area needed for required parking, where driveways and parking lots are not provided, the originally imposed 35 foot buffer strip shall be retained. The maintenance of the buffer area shall be the same as prescribed in the approval on April 28, 1976. Staff further recom~.ends that the request for reduction of the buffer area along the west property line be denied. C.P.C. 5 17 77: B.S. -6 22 77: Applicant 7 18 77: ~CASE HISTORY AND PAST COmmISSION 'AND~BOAP~ ACTION ON THIS REQUEST. Denial of the request was recommended. Deferred further hearin~ at %he request to the July 27, 1977 meeting. Requested that hearing of this matter be further deferred to September 28, 1977. , I , · I t ; I ! ASE ~:U~.'~BER: ?PLICANT: 77S034 SUNSET HOMES, INCORPORATED U~e ~1~ 49~7-q~=~=~. ) July 27, 1977 (B.S~' EQUEST AND PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Community Business (B-2) %o General Business (B-3). The Applicant plans to store motor Vehicles. on this lot. ENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Matoaca Magisterial District, this parcel fronts along the northeast line of Chesterfield Avenue and the northwest line of Boisseau Street, and is located north of ihe intersection of the aforementioned roads. Tax Map Sec. 182-9 (10) Boisseau, Blk 1, Lots 1, lB, lC and 1E (Sheet 53/54). 'CREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (£UBJECT PARCEL): This parcel is approximately 1 acre in area, is zoned Co~Lunity Business (B-2) and is presently used for motor vehicle storage. DJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property to the northeast is zoned Residential (R-7), property to the scutheast is zoned Convenience Business (B-l), property to the south is zcned Community Business (B-2), ~ and property to the west and northwest is zoned Convenience Business (B-l). Adjacent properties are occupied by single family dwellings or by commercial uses. TILITIES, 'SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE P~D EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Public water and sewer is available and on site to serve this project. If any improvements for driveways or parking areas are made, The Applicant must submit a drainage and erosion control plan to the County Engineer. The soils on this property are sandy loam, have a gentle slope and only a slight chance for erosion. These soils ~re poorly suited for foundations and roadways. Parking areas will be difficult to maintain under wet conditions, therefore parking areas-and driveways should be paved. No off-site easements will be required. UBLIC FAciLITIES: Development of the parcel in question under commercial' zoning should exercise no additional impact on either existing or future area public facilities. -' RANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: T~e intersection of Chesterfield Avenue and Boisseau Street is a heavily traveled intersection. The Highway Department~ 1975 and 1975 Primary and Secondary road. traffic counts show the following average daily trips on area roads: (a) Chesterfield Avenue, Boisseau Street, intersection, north and south - 4,405 ADT; (b) Chesterfield Avenue, Boisseau Street, intersection, east - 1,383 ADT; (c) Chesterfield Avenue, Randolph Street, intersection, west - 207 ADT. ~ENERAL PLAN: This lot lies in an area designated for commercial use. .EQUEST ANALYSIS: Sunset Homes, Incorporated, (James Davis, responsible agent) plans to use this lot for vehicle storage. The Applicant states that the property will not be developed further than for a storage area for motor vehicles. · 1- (over) LTERNATIVES AND MITI~.~TI MEASURES: Staff revi=we the file on the subjeCt property and found that prior to January 1, 1973, this lot was zoned. General Business (C-2) which permitted the sale and storage of motor vehicles.. On January 1, 1973, the Chesterfield County Zoning Ordinance was amended and re-enacted. As a result this lot was rezoned to the Com~unity Business (B-2) classification. Tkls lot was so zoned because at that time, the.primary use of the property was for professional offices, and because the B-2 zoning was compatible with adjacent-commercial zoning. Also, the Community Business (B-2) classification-provided a better transition from residential property adjacent to the northeast lin~. Staff checked with the State Department of !.[otor Vehicles and the County License Department and determined that no one has ever been licensed to sell or repair motor vehicles on the subject property. On May 14, 1976, Staff received a complaint that the subject property was being used for the sale and storage of automobiles. We visited the property and found at least 12 trucks and cars with for sale signs posted on them. Between May 1976, and October 1976, we sent numerous letters to Sunset Homes Incorporated, and Mr. James Davis. Ail letters were returned unclaimed. During this period we made visits to this property in response to continued complaints by adjacent property owners who called and stated that Mr. Davis was on site showing automobiles to prespective customers. Each time we arrived on the property, Mr. Davis was gone. In October 1976, we obtained a warrant for the arrest of Mr. James Davis for' violation of the Chesterfield County Zoning OrdinanCe to Wit: operating a used car business in a Community Business (B--2) District on the subject parcel. On November 18, 1976, in the Chesterfield County General District Court, Judge John F. Daffron, Jr., after being advised of the circumstances of this case, advised Mr. Davis that he should apply for the rezoning of the property to General Business (B-3)' if he wished to continue the selling and/or storing of motor vehicles on this property, or cease operation. The General District Court has continued the case against Mr. Davis until April, 1977, in order that Mr. Davis might apply for the proper zoning for the sales and/or storage of motor vehicles on this property. In assessing land' uses in this area,it can readily be determined that the properties fronting Chesterfield Avenue have been developed for a variety of commercial activities. However, within a block to a half block depth on either side of Chesterfield Avenue, resonably dense r~sidential use is prodominate.. In this respect,' the Commission should consider the appropriateness of protecting this adjacent residential property to the north and northeast while permitting increased commercial activity on the subject parcel. The operation of a used car lot at this location would be compatible with uses' along Chesterfield Avenue. However, since single family residences abut the property, it would seem reasonable that if rezoning to the General Business (B-3) classification is permitted, outside storage, includiDg the proposed used car lot should be screened from these residences. Since no existing vegetation offers such screening, the construction of appropriate fencing would be in order. Staff notes that along this property line, a minimum 20 foot setback is required by the Zoning Ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATIOL Should the Commission s~ fit to approve the requested General Business (B-3) reclassification, it is recommended that rezoning occur only upon the imposition of a buffer strip having a width of not less than 20 feet along the northeast property line. Within this buffer strip, a solid ornamental fence, no less than 6 feet in height, shall be constracted along the entire length. of the property. No parking or storage of motor vehicles, nor driveway access shall occur within the 20 fQot buffer.- CAST HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION ON THIS REQUEST. C.P.C. 2 15 77: Deferred at the request of the Applicant. C.P.C. 3 15 77: Deferred at the request of the Applicant. C.P.C. 7 21 77: Recommended denial of this request. B-2 !1 VIRGINIA STATE 'COLLEGE 7 7'5o~5'/-- ' el /; ./ 7 7~ ~34. -1 77S049 July 27, 1977 APPLICANT: BRANDERMILL REQUEST AND PROPOSED' USE: An amendment to a previously granted Conditional Use fOr planned Development (Case $74S021) to permit an additional public road access from Old Hundred Landing to Hull Street Road. GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP 'IDENTIFICATION: In Clover Hill and Midlothian Magisterial Districts, this request is on part of a parcel of land fronting along the northwest line of Hull Street Road, and being located west of its intersection with Old Hundred Road. Tax Map 36 (1) Par 4; 46 (1) Par 23-1 7 32-1; 47 (1) Par 6 & 9; 61 (1) Par 6, 8, & 9; 61-12 (1) Par 1 & 6; 61-16 (1) Par 5; 62 (1) Par 20 (Sheet 13 & 20). ACREA'GE, EXISTING *ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): The area of this request lies along the north side of Hull Street Road in the vicinity of the proposed subdivision of Thornridge. This subdivision was given tentative approval by Planning Commission on January 25, 19771 This land is zoned Residential (R-7) and is presently vacant. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: The land to the east of Thornridge Subdivision is zoned Convenience Business (B-l). The area to the south and west is zoned Agricultural (A), while land to the north is zoned Residential (R-7). Lying between Thornridge Subdivision and the Village of Bright Hope is the Swift Creek Water Filtration Plant. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND~ EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: This request will have no effect on public utilities. Soils are sandy loam; sloping to moderately steep and a moderate chance for erosion. Soils are well drained and well suited for roadways, except for an area marked ll0-C-1 (see attached soil map). These soils have a high swell potential. Before any clearing begins, a road plan, erosion control plan and siltation agreement must be approved. PUBLIC FACILITIES: This request will .have no effect on either existing or future area public facilities. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: Because Brandermill is a Planned Community, a significant portion of the recreational and commercial trips generated from the Community to households will be destined within the Villages comprising the Community. Internally generated traffic should not travel on roads external to the. Community. To use external~access (Route 360) would create an unreasonable traffic burden on a ~oad* whOse primary function is that of a arterial highway and not a local collector street. With this access, Bright Hope is not an integral part of Brandermill, but merely an adjacent development which will adversely impact Route 360 traffic. Route 360 is a major concern for traffic planners. Creating another access from Mill ridge Parkway area to Route 360 does not appear to offer any traffic flow advantages at the proposed location. i. over This location is only ~0 feet from the existin9 .ccess to Brandermill, which presently includes divided roadwavs, deceleration lanes and alignment with existing crossover. Extension of Thornridge Road does not align with an existing crossover. Rather those motorist using Thornridge to get to Route 360 east, must travel west and U-turn east, and those traveling east on 360 wishinq to use Thornridge Road must U-turn west at the existing Millridge Parkway crossover. In addition, no deceleration lanes are indicated on Route 360 at the proposed extension of Thornridge Road. The Highway Department's 1975 Primary Road Traffic Count in no way indicates the density of traffic in the area of this request. Obviously, as Brandermill grows, vehicular traffic both' east and'west along Route 360, in the area of the request, will increase, thereby intensifying the impact of eliminating an internal road between Old Hundred Landing and the Village of Bright Hope and increasing the traffic hazard of another access from Thornridge Subdivision onto Route 360. A great consideration should be the vertical curvature in US 360 in this area. The plan for the three villages is a basic L-shape. Ail of the non-residential' land uses, except for the elementary and middle school and fire station tract are clustered around the ends of the L. The specific area of concern is the relationship between the activities in Bright Hope Village at.one end of the L, and the activities in the rest of Brandermill, and what transportation facilities are necessitated by these relationships. The most striking function difference between Bright Hope and the rest of Brandermill is the concentration on commercial activityin Bright Hope Village as opposed to Old Hundred Landing and St. Ledger. 23% of the land in Bright Hope is devoted to commercial activity, as opposed to 6% in St. Ledger and less than 1% in Old Hundred Landing. Bright Hope has 58.5% of all the commercial acreage in the three villages. The total commercial area in the 3 villages is 119,700 square feet. Using trip factors provided by Kimley Horn (60 ADT/1000 square feet of community retail area) one may calculate that this total commercial acreage represents 7,182 2-way ADT. Dividing this by the total dwelling units in the three villages (6060 units) yields a factor of 1.185 2-way ADT/dwelling unit for conu~unity cor~u,ercial activity. c~i,uL,unity commercial activity in Bright Hope will attract an ADT of 4200 (70 acres x 60 ADT/acre), and the demand by occupants of Bright Hope for community, commercial trips is 1.185 x 1177, or 1395 ADT. This leaves approximately 2800 ADT destined for the Bright Hope community commercial area originating in Old Hundred Landing area. The It is the Staff opinion that this 2800 ADT would utilize the planned collector steet between Bright Hope and Old Hundred Landing. In addition, the only high school in the area is located next to Bright Hope so that all high school students in Old Hundred Landing and St. Ledger could use the collector street, rather than 360~ This estimate, as provided by Staff, is considerable higher than the 1400 ADT estimated by the developer's consultants for this collector street. Based on the development data as provided by the developer's consultant, the Staff feels that the developer's estimate of the traffic on the collector between Bright Hope and Old Hundred Landing is low. ' e Apart from the estimates of traffic demand, ther~ are general guidelines for collector street planning specified in the proposed General Plan 2000 as has been presented to and reviewed by the Planning Commission. Policy 5G states: "Encourage the design of collector routes so that congestion on arterial roads is ameliorated." GENERAL PLAN: This parcel lies in an area approved .for the development of a Planned Community. ~LTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: When the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors originally considered the Conditional Use Planned Development, rezoning and Master Plan proposal for approval of Brander- mill, a great deal of concern centered around the impact that this developmen~ would have on area traffic. From the on set, the Master Plan showed a collector road paralleling Route 360 between the Villages of Bright Hope and Old Hundred Landing. In addition, the approved Plan allowed for a predominance of residential and recreational development in the Old Hundred Landing Village and a predominance of commercial and multi-family development in the Bright Hope Village. The developers of Brandermill argued that the-collector road should be eleminated from the Masher Plan thereby f~neling traffic genernted between the two villages onto Route 360. Both the Commission and Board of Supervisors were presented with the s~me arguements as are ~ade in support of the current application fer elimination of'this' collector road. However, at the time the P15nned Development was approved, the Commission and Board saw fit tc reject this proposal and resolved that the connecting collector be reuained. It was reasoned that without the connection the the impact of development in both the Bright Hope and Old Hundred Landing Villages would be such, given the scope of the proposed land use, that an adverse traffic situation would result along Route 360 in this area. It was further resolved, that no additional-public road access be provided to Route 360 by means other that the Millridge Parkway collector in Old Hundred Landing and a major collector serving Bright Hope Village. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: be denied. Staff would recommend that the Applicant's reauest 3. (over) CASE ~ISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST. C.P.C. 3 15 77: Staff 3 23 77: Staff 4 11 77: .C.P.C. 4 19 77: C.P.C. 5 17 77: C.P.C. 6 21 77: Deferred by the Commission to provide the Applicant time for further study and justification of the request. Staff met with Applicant and suggested ways and means by Which the need for this request could be eliminated, or justification to support the request could be developed. The Applicant has not attempted to respond in a positive manner or propose any alternatives to eliminating the connector road between Bright Hope and Old Hundred Landing,.nor has any alternative to additional access to Route 360 been proposed. Deferred 30 days at the request of the Applicant~. The AppliCant withdrew the first part of the original request which was to eliminate the condition requiring construction of a-residential collector road between the Villages of Bright Hope and Old Hundred Landing. Deferred by the Commission to provide the Commission time to consider a one-way entrance from Route 360 as opposad to a two-way access.road. Recommended denial of this application. COMMONWrAI.TH OF ¥1NOINI& DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS.AND TRANSPORTATION ~ay ~6. 1977 P. O. ]~o'x 3036 23235 Po O. ~ox 287 l~tlot~isn, ¥irg~ 231~3 RE: B=ande~.'J.1]. 360 Of~ie.e Site ~e have made a revievof the tentativeplan of 360 Office Site. · f a crossover ~s provided on Htllr~dge FarL~ray at the intersection of L~st V~11age Green Drive, as discussed in our telephone conversation, adequate access will be provided to both Thorn~idge Subdivision and the 360 Office Site. Therefore, we are recommending that the one-way entrance from Route 360 to l/est Village Green Drive be elt~t-*tet. If we can be of any further assistance, please Very truly yours E. L. Covington, Jr. Resident Engineer cc: Hr. Stn~!ey R. Hr. J:f.m Hayes R. 3. HcCracken Assistant Resident Enginee:r Balderson, Jr.J 77S091 July 27, 1977 APPLICANT-. J. J. H. CORPORATION REQUEST & PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residenti&l (R-7) and_Residential (R-9). The Applicant plans to subdivide this parcel for single family residential use. GENERAL LOCATION & TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Matoaca Magisterial District, this parcel.fronts Dpproximately 375 feet.on Happy Hill Road, approximately 400 feet northwest of its intersection with Jefferson Davis Highway. Tax Map 149-11.(1) Parcel 1 (Sheet 41). ACREAGE EXISTING, ZONING EXISTING, LAND USE '('SUB'JECT PARCEL): Agricultural (A), vacant and undeveloped. 64..5 acres, ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Northwest, southwest - Agricult6ral south - Residential (R-7); east - Community Business (B-2); occupied-- by single family dwellings or remains vacant or undeveloped. .~ UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Public water and sewer is available. It is estimated that development of this parcel under the Residential (R-7) classification, with use of public water and sewer, would permit a density of approximately 172 single family dwellings. The Utilities Department currently reports than an average single family residence uses 240 gallons of water per day; therefore, 41,280. gallons per day would be utilized by this development. These per un£1t flows are not line design flows because peak flow plus fire service - flow must be considered for design purposes. There is an available ~. water treatment capacity of 20 million gallons per day from the Appomattox, serving this area with 1 to 2 million gallons per day now being used. The County Engineer calculates per capita sewage flow at 100 gallons per day for design purposes. Based on an average of 3.5 persons per single family dwelling unit, approximately 602 gallons per. day of sewage effluent will be generated ~for treatment by the proposed' subdivision. These sewage treatment figures are greater than the water used because of infiltration and inflow. The Timsberry Creek Sewer Trunk, which will serve this project, will connect to the Proctors Creek Sewage Plant. Soils on this property are sandy'loam and land wet, gently sloping to sloping with a moderate chance for erosion. This parcel lies in the Timsberry Creek Drainage Pattern. During development, drainage and erosion problems are anticipated; therefore, there should be no clearing or construction on this site until a site plan and erosion control plan have been approved. Off-site drainage easements will be required. 1. over PUBLIC FACILITIES: Base~on the 1977 average of 0'~ public school students per single family dwelling, approximately 155 puwils will be generated by this development. This subdivision is now within the Harrowgate ElementarY, Carver Heights Junior 'High School and Thomas Dale High School attendance zones. The subdivision Hill be served by the Chester 'Fire Station, Company %1, operated by County employees, located 5.2 miles away. Fire service capability is adequate to serve this project. The developer will be required to provide fire hydrants to serve this development. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: Staff finds that the conditions of Happy Hill Road in the area of the request, is very poor with no plans for i.u,,ediate improvements. Staff finds that the intersection of Jefferson Davis Highway and Happy Hill Road is very poorly aligned and again there are no-plans in the immediate future for the realignment of this intersection. Single family development under the requested single family classification would result in the generation of approximately 1,685 average daily traffic based on an estimate of 9.8 trips per single family residence. These vehicular movements would be distributed over Happy Hill Road and .Jefferson Davis Highway which are nowadjacent to the proposed development. The State Highway Department's 1975 Primary Traffic Counts and 1976 Secondary Traffic Counts are shown on the attached map. GENERAL PLAN: Agricultural (A) and commercial. REQUEST ANALYSIS: In this case, the Applicant plans to purchase from Nannette F. Dunlop estate. The Applicant requests the rezoningfrom Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-7) and ~Residential (R~9), and Plans to subdivide this property for single family residential use and create approximately 172 building lots. '"' ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: Staff notes that this parcel fronts along Happy Hill Road, which is very poorly aligned with Jefferson Davis Highway. Staff also has noted that Searcy Subdivision lies to the southwest of this property. Staff finds that the property north, west and south of this parcel are large vacant property with a good potential for future subdivision. Because of the lot area of present subdivisions in this area, and the future potential for subdivision of v~cant properties, Staff believes that Residential (R-9) or (R-12) classification would be more compatible with present and future land use ~that the requested(R-7) classification. CASE HISTORY.AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST. 5 17 77: 6 21 77: Deferred 30 days inorder to give the Applicant time to amend his request and for Staff to study a revised site plan. As of this writing, a revised plan showning the above noted rezoning line has not been submitted. Recommended approval of Res. R-7 & Res. R-9 as shown on the revised tentative subdivision plan, Timsberry Trace, dated 6/15/77 (See attached.) e 4/ .- mm m ,,~',,,~2',~,~'4. ,.l~/.~r. I P~ECHANICSVILLI: VA 23111 ! I'1' CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT. · 77S096 July 27, 1977 B. S. OSCAR S. HASTINGS, JR. REQUEST &' PROPOSED' USE: The rezoning from Residential (R-7) to Community Business (B-2) for use in development of a shopping center. GENERAL LOCATION & TAX MAP IDENTIF:ICATI'ON: In Midlothian Magisterial District, this property fronts along the north line of Robious Road and the east line of. Bon Air Road and~is located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of these roads. ~ax Map 17-8 (1) Parcels 11 & 12 (Sheet 8). ACREAGE, EXISTING 'ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE :('SUBJECT PARCEL): 0.81 acres; Residential (R-7) and is primarily vacant; to the east and south is 'Community Business (B-2) and is either occupied by or proposed for commercial use; to the northwest is zoned for office use. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE,' DRA.INA~E. AND ERO'S'ION,'REQUI-~' OFF-BITE EA'SEMENTS: The developer is in the process of bringing both water and sewer to this property. Soils are sandy loam,--nearly level to gently sloping and under present conditions have a slight chance for erosion. These:soils are poorly drained and have a high seasonal water table; therefore, are poorly suited for foundations and roadways. . : This property lies in the Powhite Creek Drainage Pattern. Because of soil conditions and topography, drainage and erosion problems.are anticipated during construction; therefore, no clearing or construction should begin until a site plan and erosion control plan have been approved.. Off-site easements for drainage will be required. PUBLIC FACILITIES: This project will be served bY the Bon. Air Fire Station, Company #4, operated by County Employees and located 3.0 miles away. Fire service, capability will be adequate if a reliable water supply and fire hydrants are provided.. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: In the area of"the request, Robious Road is in good.condition; however, Bon Air Road in only fair to poor. The Highway Department's 1975 Primary'and 1976 Secondary Average Daily Traffic Counts are noted on the attached traffic map. The developer has indicated that a de-ecceleration lane will be provided along the Old Bon Air. Road frontage. .Staff would note that although it cannot be made a condition of zoning, dedication of necessary right- of-way along Old Bon Air Road as well as Robiosu Road, is appropriate and will be taken into consideration upon review of the final site plan for development of the property. The Applicant should address this question and indicate his intent. GENERAL' PLAN: Multiple family use. 1. over REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant has a contract to purchase this property from Thomas H. Brown. The Applicant requests the rezoning from Residential (R-7) to Community Business (B-2). He intends to develop a shopping center on this property and the property to the east and south of the subject parcel. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEA:SUR~.S: Since the parc1 in question is sourrounded on three sides by commercial zoning, and is intended to be incorporated in a plan for development of a shopping center in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Old Bon Air and Robious Roads, commercial rezoning is appropriate. However, there are' alternatives open to the Commission other than recommending approval of the-requested Community Business (B-2) reclassification. The parcel could be zoned Convenience Business (B-I). This zoning. would accommodate most of the uses which are commonly inCluded in a shopping cetner development. Moreover, since office use i intended for the parcel west of the subject site, Office Business (0) relcassification might alos be appropriate. In any event, the property directly to the north, which is zoned Resi- dential (R-7), should be protected from commercial encroachment. 7~ Therefore, a buffer along the north property line may be in order. ' STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is of the opinion that the requested Community Business (B-2) zoning is reasonable for .the property in question and should offer no detriment to either adjacent or area properties; however, it is felt that no commercial zoning should be approved on this parcel unless accompanied by the following stipulation: "A buffer strip, having a width of not less than 35 feet, shall be provided along the north property line. This buffer shall consist of existing vegetation with no trees, shrUbs-or other growth to be cut, removed or .otherwise disurbed with the exception that a minimu~ area may be cut and cleared to permit the erection of a solid boardn fence which shall also be required along the northern property'tine. This fence shall not be less than 6 feet in height and shall be off-set from the property line a distance of at least 5 feet so that vegetation can be maintained on both sides of the fence. Any clear area within the buffer strip which is greater than 200 square feet shall be planted with evergreen plants and shrubs to prepetuate the continual effect of the buffer." CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD'ACTION. 5 17 77: Deferred 30 days at the request of the Applicant. C.P.C. 6 21 77: Recommended Community Bosiness (B-2) zoning, subject to the following stipulation: "A buffer strip having a width of not less than 20 feet, shall be provided along the north property line. This buffer shall consist of dense vegetation, approved by the Development Review Division and the erection of a solid board fence shall also be required along the northern property line. This fence shall not be less than 6 feet in height and shall be off-set from the property line a distance of at least fi~ feet so that vegetation can be maintained on both sides of the fence. CASE NUMBER: 77Sl19 July 27, 1977 B.~ S. APPLICANT: EARL S. PATTERSON, SR. REQUEST AND PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Resi- dential (R-9). The Applicant plans to construct approximately 427 single family dwellings. The Planning Commission will review the tenta- tive plan for Ferryhill Farms Subdivision on June 28, 1977. GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Clover Hill Magisterial District, this parcel fronts along the west line of Newby's Bridge Road and is located approximately 1200 feet north of its intersection with Claypoint Road. Tax Map 62-8 (1) Parcels 1 & 2; 62-11 (1) Parcels 2 & 3 and 62-12 (1) Parcel 1 (Sheet 20). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approximately 168 acres, zoned Agricultural (A) and vacant except for a single family dwelling and a barn. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Property to the north is zoned Residential (R-15), to the east Agricultural (A), to the south Residen- tial (R-15), to the west and northwest is zoned Agricultural (A). Adjacent property is occupied by single family dwellings or remains vacant. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Public water is available to serve this property. poses to create approximately 427 lots. The developer pur- The Utilities Department currently reports that an average single family residence uses 240 gallons per day; therefore, approximately 102,480 gallons per day would be utilized by this development. These per unit flows are not line design flows because peak flow, plus fire service flow are to be considered for design purposes. There is an available water treatment capacity of approximately 10 million gallons per day from Swift Creek, serving this area with approximately 4 to 6 million gallons per day now being used. A 24 inch water line is located along Route 360, approximately 1600 feet from this request. It is estimated that it will cost $24,000 to provide public water for this property. The County Utilities Department calculates per capita sewage flow at 100 gallons per day for design purposes based on an average of 3.5 persohs per single family dwelling, approximately 149,450 gallons per day of sewage effluent would be generated for treatment by the proposed subdivision. These sewage treatment figures are greater than the water used because of infiltration and inflow. The Nuttree Sewer Trunk, which will serve this project, will connect to the Falling Creek Treat- ment Plant. Soils on this property are sandy loam and land wet, gently sloping to very steep and under present conditions have a moderate chance for erosion. These soils are unfavorable for drainfields; they are best suited for single family dwellings served by public sewer. The wetness in low areas and shallow rocki% on steep slopes will limit building site locations. This parcel lies in the Nuttree Branch, Swift Creek Drainage Pattern. Drainage and erosion problems are anticipated during construction;. therefore, a site plan and erosion control plan must be approved be- fore clearing or construction begins. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Based on the 1977 average of 0.90 public school students per single family dwellings, approximately 384 students will be generated by this development. This subdivision is now within the Watkias Elementary, and the Clover Hill Junior and Sen~or High School atten- dance zones. This subdivision will he served by the Clover Hill Fire Station, Com- pany 97, a volunteer unit, and is located 6 miles from the property. The fire service capability will be very limited due to the lack of water and distance from the fire station. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: Single family development under the proposed plan would result in the generation of approximately 4,185 average daily traffic based on an estimate of 9.8 trips per single family residence. These vehicular movements would be distributed over Newby's Bridge Road, now adjacent to the proposed development. The extension of Turkey Run Road and Tall Pine Road and other collectors would pro- vide access for the development. The State Highway Department's 1976 Secondary and 1975 Primary Traffic Counts are shown on the attached traffic map. Bailey's Bridge Road, in the area of the request, is considered to be in poor to fair condition. GENERAL PLAN: Agricultural (A) REQUEST ANALYSIS: This property presently belongs to David F. Freeman, Helen Clodfelter and Estell Cosby. The Applicant requests the re- zoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-9) of the subject pro- perty. The Applicant plans to subdivide this property for single family residential use and create approximately 427 lots. He states that~County water and sewer will be used and that roadside ditches will be provided. He notes that the minimum size lot will be 10,400 square feet in area and the maximum si.ze lot will be 24,000 square feet in area. See attached tentative road tryout map. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: Staff finds that the subdivisions of - Kellersley and Clifton Farms lie north and northeast of this property and are zoned Residential (R-15). Staff notes that the property which lies southeast of this parcel and along the east line of Bailey's Bridge Road is a large vacant parcel, zoned Residential (R-15). This property has a good potential for future subdivision. Staff finds that the property to the west of this parcel is primarily zoned Agricultural (A) and is large vacant parcels with a good potential for future subdivisions. Staff notes that proposed Route 288 is located adjacent to the west boundry of this property. Also, Staff finds that a proposed power line will run through the northwest corner of this property along Nuttree Creek. Because properties adjacent to this parcel are zoned Residential (R-15) and the.large vacant parcels to the west have a good potential for future subdivision, Staff believes that the Residential (R-12) or the Resi- dential (R-15) zoning should be considered as reasonable alternatives to the requested Residential (R-9). Over e CASE HISTORY .~ND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION. C.P.C. 6'21-77: Recommended approval of R-9 rezoning. CASE NUMBER: 77S120 July 27, 1977 B. S. APPLICANT:- EDWARD E. MORING AND NORRIS~E. JONES, JR. REQUEST & PROPOSED USE: The rezQning from Agricultural (A) to Resi- dential (R-9). The Applicants plan to subdivide this property and create approximately 30 building lots. GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAPIDENTIFICATION: In Matoaca Magisterial District, this parcel fronts along the northeast line of Swift Creek Lane and is located approximately 1500 feet southeast of its intersection with Brander's Bridge Road. Tax Map 163-13 (1) Parcel 13 (Sheet 49). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approximately 10.5 acres, zoned Agricultural (A),vacant and wooded. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Parcel is bounded on the north- east by the Seaboard Coastline Railroad and the City of Colonial Heights. The property to the north, west and south is zoned Agricultural(A) and is occupied by single family dwellings ~or remains vacant. Pro- perty to the southeast is zoned Residential (R-7) and is occupied by single family dwellings. UTILITIES,SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Public water and sewer are not available through Chesterfield County to serve this property,' However, the developer should contact Colonial Heights to determine whether or not they can serve this par- cel with water and.sewer. Soils on this property are sandy loam and land wet, gently sloping and, under present conditions, have only a slight chance for erosion. The soils are poorly suited for this project; more than 80% of this par- cel has a seasonal water table at 18 inches depth.or less. These soils are poor for foundations and unfavorable for drainfields. This parcel lies in the Swift Creek Drainage Area. Drainage and erosion problems are anticipated during construction due to the proximity of natural water courses. Prior to clearing or construction, a site plan and an erosion control plan must be approved. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Based on the 1977 average of 0.90 public school students per single family dwelling, approximately 27 students~would be generated by this development.. This subdivision is now within the Harrowgate Elementary, Matoaca Middle School and Thomas Dale High School attendance zones. This subdivision will be served by the Ettrick Fire Station,~ Company $12, which is both a paid and volunteer company. Fire service capability will be limited due to the lack of a reliable water supply. If public water and fire hydrants ~are not provided, some type of reservoir for fire protection must be provided. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: Single family development under the requested R-9 zoning would result in the generation of approximately. 294 average daily traffic based on an estimate of 9.8 trips per single family re- sidence. These vehicular movements will be distributed over Swift Creek Lane now adjacent to the proposed development. Swift Creek Lane and Brander's Bridge Road, in the area of the request, are in poor to fair condition. over GENERAL PLAN: Agricultural (A) REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicants have an Agreement of Sale~ to purchase this property from Benjamin Walker and Robert Sharp. The Applicants request the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-9). They plan to subdivide this,property and create approximately 30 building lots. As of this writing, no tentative subdivision plat has been filed with Planning Staff. ALTERNATIVES. AND MITIGATING MEASURES: Staff notes that the property to the north and west are.large vacant parcels with a good potential for future subdivision. Staff believes that unless the developer can obtain public water and sewer through the City of Colonial Heights, this requ~.st should be denied. Due to soil conditions on this property, approval of this request, ~without the use of public water and sewer, will be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of future residents of the proposed subdivision. CkSE HISTORY' AND P~ST ~COMMIES'ION AND · BOA'RD ~C'TION. c.p.c. 6 21 77: Recommended approval of R-9 rezoning. e CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: 77S121 RICHARD F. BOZARD, ET.AL. July 27, 1977 B.S. REQUEST AND PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Resi- dential (R-40). The'Applicant plans to construct 16 single 'family dwellings on this property. Planning Commission gave tentative approval to the proposed subdivision of Winterfield Ridge on May 24, 1977. GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Midlothian Magisterial District, this parcel fronts along the west line of Winterfield Road and is located approximately 1600 feet north of its intersection with Netherfield Drive. Tax Map 7-1 (1) Parcel 1 (Sheet 2). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND .USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approxi- mately 54 acres, zoned Agricultural (A), vacant and wooded. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING:AND LAND USE: Ail adjacent property is zoned Agricultural (A) except that to the southeast, which is zoned Residential (R-15). The subdivision of Salisbury lies to the southeast of this property, while.all other properties are vacant and wooded or occupied by single family dwellings· UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: The Applicant plans ko use individual wells and septic tanks in this development. Staff finds that public water is available to serve this property. A 16 inch water line is located along Winterfield and Netherfield Drive, approximately 1600 feet from this property. It would cost approximately $16,00n to ~roVide water for this parcel. The Utilities Department currently reports that an average single family residence uses 240 gallons of water per day; therefore, 3840 gallons of water per day would be utilized by .this development. These per unit flows are not line design flows because peak flow plus fire service flow .must be considered for design purposes. There is an available water treatment capacity of 10 million gallons per day from swift Creek,' serving this area with 4 to 6 million gallons per day now being used. This parcel lies in the Roberts Branch Sewage Drainage Area. The closest sewer.trunk is located along Falling Creek; therfore, it is not feasible that this parcel be served by public sewer. The ~oils on this property are primarily sandy loam, gently sloping to steep, and under present conditions, have only a moderate chance for erosion. Better than 80% of the soils on this property are poor for foundations and unfavorable for drainfields. This parcel lies in the Bernard's Creek Drainage Pattern. Due to the topography of this property, drainage and erosion problems are antici- pated during construction; therefore, no clearing should begin until a site plan and erosion control plan have been approved. Off-site drainage easements will be required. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Based on the 1977 average of 0.9~ public school students per single family dwelling, approximately 15 students will be generated by this~development. This subdivision is now within the Robious Elementary, and Junior High Schools and Midlothian High School attendance zones. This subdivision will be served by the Midlothian Fire Station,.Com- pany #5, a volunteer unit. Fire service capability will be extremely limited unless public water is extended to this property from Winter- field and Netherfield Roads. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: Single family development under the requested R-40 zoning would result in the generation of approximately 157 average daily traffic based on an estimate of 9.8 .trips per single family residence. These vehicular movements would be distributed over Winterfield Road, now adjacent to .the proposed development. Presently, Winterfield Road is being hardsurfaced in the area of the request and is in fair to good condition. The Highway Department's 1976 Secondary Average Daily Traffic Count along Winterfield Road, in the area of the request, was 374 ADT. GENERAL PLAN: Agricultural (A) use REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant, who is the'property owner, requests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-40). The Applicant plans to subdivide this property and create.16 building lots. The Applicant states that the average lot area will be 3.36 acres, the minimum lot area, 1.10 acres and the maximum lot area, 8.00 acres. The Applicant plans to use private wells and septic tanks and to provide roadside ditches. The Planning Commission gave tentative approval to Winterfield Ridge on May 24, 1977. See attached subdivision plat. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: Staff finds that the property to the south is zoned Residential (R-15) and is occupied.by Salisbury Subdivision. Adjacent property to the north, west and south is zoned Agricultural (A) and is large vacant parcels with a good potential for future subdivision. Given the conditions of land use and zoning in the area, the requested R-40 rezoning is appropriate. 'CASE HISTO'RY AND PAST 'COMMI'SSION AND BOARD ACTION 6 21 77: Recommended apProval of R-40 rezoning. ! 1 J Z CASE NUMBER: 77S122 July 27, 1977 B. S. APPLICANT: BERMUDA ASSOCIATES REQUEST AND PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Gen- eral Business (B-3). The Applicant plans to enlarge the proposed Bermuda Square Shopping Center that is contiguous to this site. GENERAL LOCATION~ND TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Bermuda Magisterial District, this parcel fronts 678.43 feet along the north line of Loretto Avenue (unimproved), also fronting approximately 1500 feet along the west line of Briggs Road and located in the northwest quad- rant of the intersection of the aforementioned roads. Tax Map 116-10 (1) Parcel 6 & 116-11 (1) Parcel 9 (Sheet 32). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approxi- mately 7.5 acres, zoned Agricultural (A) and occupied by a house and outbuildings. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property to the north is zoned General Business (B-3) and will be developed as the Bermuda Square Shopping Center. Property to the east is zoned Agricultural (A) and is occupied.by single family dwellings or remains vacant. Property to the south is zoned Agricultural (A) and Community Business (B-2) and is occupied by C & P Telephone Company work center. Property to the west is zoned Community Business (B-2) and is occupied by a mobile home park and various other commercial office buildings. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Public water is available to serve this project; a 10 inch water line is located along Briggs Road in the area of this site. There is an available water treatment capacity of 26 million gallons per day from the Appomattox, serving this area with approximately 1 to 2 million gallons per day now being used. This parcel lies in the Ashton Creek Sewage Drainage Area and public sewer is available along Briggs Road to serve this property. Soil~ on this property are l~nd wet, gravelely sediments and loamy sandy; gently sloping to sloping andunder present conditions have only a slight chance for erosion. The majority of the soils are good for foundations and roadways. This parcel lies in the Ashton Creek Drainage Area. At present, there are no anticipated drainage and/or erosion problems; however, prior to clearing or construction, an erosion control plan must be approved for thiS development. Off-site drainage easements will be required. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Development of the proposed use should have no detri- mental impact on either existing or future area public facilities. 1. over TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: This parcel is located in an area designated as a high intensity commercial sector. The average daily traffic at the intersection of Jefferson Davis Highway and West Hundred Road is 10,875 ADT. See attached traffic map. GENERAL PLAN: This parcel lies in an high intensity sector which is designated for commercial use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant has a contract of sale agreement with M. & K. Dunlevy, property owners, to purchase this parcel. The Applicant requests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to General Business (B-3) and plans to enlarge the proposed Bermuda Shopping Center that is contiguous to the north of this property. See attached plat and site plan. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: Of primary concern in considering this request, is the degree-of commercial zoning necessary to accommo- date the proposed use. Otherwise land.use compatibility would be preserved by permitting the appropriate commercial rezoning. No shopping center has been developed under'General Business (B-3). The General Business (B-3) classification permits outside storage and certain uses which are not in keeping with shopping center development nor would be appropriate for the area in ~question. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that no higher classification than Community Business (B-2) zoning be approved. CASE HISTORY AND PAST COM24I~SSION ~ND BOARD ACTION 6 21 77: General Business (B-3) rezoning was recommended. .- /.,,4 CASE NUMBER: 77S123 APPLICANT: HARLEY S. HAMMOND REQUEST & PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Agricultural (A) to General Business (B-3). The Applicant plans to construc~ a warehouse complex on this site. GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Clover Hill Magisterial District, this parcel fronts along the south line of Hull Street Road and is located approximately 675 feet west of its intersection with Bailey's Bridge Road. Tax Map 48-16 (1) Parcel 8 (Sheet 13). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LANDUSE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approximately 7.36 acres, zoned Agricultural (A) and vacant. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING .AND LAND USE: Property to the north is zoned General Business (B-3) and is vacant. Property to the east is zoned General Business (B-3) and is occupied by a junk yard. Property to the south is zoned Agricultural (A~. and is occupied by single family dwellings or remains vacant. Property to the west is zoned General Business (B-3) and is occupied by commercial buildings and warehouses. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Public water is available to serve this property. A 24 inch water line is located along Hull Street Road to serve this property There is an available water treatment capacity of 10 million gallons per day from Swift Creek with 4 to 6 million gallons per day now being used. This parcel lies in the Swift Creek Sewage Drainage Area. The closest trunk sewer is Nutcreek; therefore, it is not feasible to use public sewer at this site. Soils on this property are sandy loam, gently sloping to sloping, and under present conditions, have only a slight chance for erosion. The majori- ty of the soils on ~is property are good for foundations, but very doubt- ful for drainfields. This parcel lies in the Swift Creek Drainage Area. At present, there are no anticipated drainage or erosion problems; however, prior to construction, an erosion control plan and site plan must be submitted for this project. Off-site drainage easements will be required. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Development of the proposed use should have no detri- mental impact on either existing or future area public facilities. TRANSPORTATION AND TPJ~FFIC: Hull Street Road, in the area of the request, is in very good condition; however, Newby's Bridge Road, which lies to the east of this property, is a narrow road and only in fair condition. The traffic generated by this project will not have a detrimental impact on the existing transportation and traffic pattern in this area. GENERAL PLAN: This parcel lies in an area designated for commercial use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant has a Contract of Sale Agreement with A. L. Jordan, property owner, to purchase this parcel. The Applicant requests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to.General Business (B-3) and plans to construct a warehouse complex on this property. See attached plat and proposed site plan. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: In.assessing this request, it is important to note that the parcel in question is bounded on the north, east and west by General Business (B-3) zoning~ Although the-property to the north (across Hull Street Road) remains undeveloped, an auto- mobile junk yard ( J & W Auto Parts) occupies the parcel to the east and an office warehouse complex (E. J. Bell) is being developed on the parcel to the west. Even though the zoning and intended ~use is compatible with adjacent development to the east-and west, the Commission may~wish to consider re- zoning the subject parcel to the Light Industrial (M-l) classification which would permit the intended use but would prohibit outside stor- age as would.be allowed under General Business (B-3). Also, zoning the first 200 feet of depth to M-1 would protect the public while allowing outside storage on the remainder of the site. ~In addition, Staff is of the opinion that regardless of classification the rear.30 foot portion of the parcel, extending eastwardly to Bailey's Bridge Road should be established as a perpetual buffer; thereby, restricting further commercial encroachment southwardly along Bailey's Bridge, while at the same time, restricting vehicular access thereto. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the requested General Business ~[B-3) rezoning is recommended subject to ~the imposition of a buffer strip comprising the last 30 feet of width~of the subject parcel, running perpendictular to Bailey's Bridge Road. This buffer strip shall be maintained in its existing state with no vegetation to be cut, removed, or otherwise disturbed. All existing trees, -shrubs and underbrush shall be protected. C.P.C. 6 21 77: CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND' BOARD' ~CTION FOR THI'SREQUEST. It was resolved to recommend approval of General Bus- iness (B-3) zoning, subject to the imposition of a buffer strip comprising the last '30 feet of width of the subject parcel, running perpendiCular to Bailey's Bridge Road. This buffer strip shall be maintained in its existing state with no vegetafiion to be cut, removed or otherwise disturbed. All existing trees, shrubs and underbrush shall be protected. ./ . CERTIFiC_A_TE 1176 // -7' . / July 27, 1977 (B.S.) CASE NUMBER: 77S124 APPLICANT: JOHN F. DAFFRON, OLIVER D. RUDY, AND W. COURTNEY WELLS REQUEST & PROPOSED USE: The rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Office Business (O). The Applicants plan to use this p~operty to increase park- ing for a proposed office building in the Courthouse Complex. GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Dale Magisterial District, this parcel is located approximately 250 feet off the north line of Iron Bridge Road, measured from a point 300 feet west of the intersection of Iron Bridge Road and Krause Road, adjacent to the Chesterfield County Health Department Building. Tax Map 95-8 (1) Parcel 15-1 (Sheet 31). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): 0.12 acres, zoned Agricultural (A) and occupied by a professional office building. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND ~LAND USE: Property zoned Agricultural (A), except that to the south and southwest, which is zoned Convenience Bus- iness (B-l). Adjacent property is occupied by governmental or profession- al office buildings. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Utilities, soil, drainage'and erosion and required off-site easements will not be affected by this request. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Development of the proposed use should have no detri- mental impact on either existing or future public facilities. T~3~NSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: This request will have no affect On the traffic pattern or the traffic in the area of this request. GENERAL PLAN: Property is designated for commercial use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicants plan to purchase this property from Chesterfield County. They request the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Office Business (0) and plan to use the parcel to increase parking for an office building they are planning to construct in the Courthouse Complex. See attached-site plan. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: The Applicants are purchasing the subject parcel from the County of Chesterfield in order to provide sufficient lot area to accommodate the required parking for an office building located on adjacent property west of the request site. The subject parcel will be purchased upon approval of the requested rezoning. The proposed rezoning and intended land use are compatible with develop- ment in the CourthoUs~ Complex area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the rezoning is recommended. C.P.C.' 6 '21 '77: CASE HI'STORY ~ND~ .A.NI)?PABST ' COMMIS~S:ION. AND~ .BOA.RD' ACTION · FOR 'T~'I:S 'REQUEST. Recommended approval of the request. CHESTERFI~ ': COURTI-1OgS__E_ CASE NUMBER: 77S126 July 27, 1977 (~.S.) ~ -~t-,- ~-7- ~-.~.~.~ APPLICANT: HUGUENOT COMMERCIAL PARK COMPANY REQUEST & PROPOSED USE: An amendment to a Conditional Use for aIPlanned Development to allow specific uses other than permitted uses in a Convenience Business~ (B-l) District in-Huguenot Commercial Park. GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: In Midlothian Magisterial District, this lot fronts along the south line of Allecingie Parkway and is located 286 feet east of its intersection with Huguenot Road. Tax Map 8-16 (6) Huguenot Commercial Park, Blk A, Lots 1 & 2 (Sheet 2). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approximately 1/2 acre in area, zoned Convenience Business (B-i) and presently vacant. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property is zoned Con- venience Business (B-l) except that to the south which is zoned Agri- cultural (A). Property is either'developed or~ being developed for : commercial use except that to the south which is vacant. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Public water and sewer is available to serve this property. Soils on this property are well suited for the proposed use. At this time, there are no anticipated drainage or erosion problems; however, prior to clearing or construction, a site plan and erosion control plan must be approved. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Development of the proposed use should have no detri- mental impact to either existing or future public facilities. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: The proposed request will have no detrimental impact on the existing traffic pattern in this area. GENERAL PLAN: Property is designated for commercial use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: In this case, the Applicant, who is the property owner, requests an amendment to a Conditional Use for Planned Development (74S121 and 74S122) to allow specific uses other than those permitted in the Convenience Business (B-l) District. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: On February 12, 1975, the Board of Supervisors, upon recommendation of the Planning Commission, granted approval to the Robious 147 Investment Company and Virginia Trabue Land Company (Cases 74S121 & 74S122) for a Conditional Use for Planned Develop- ment which permitted the creation of the Huguenot Commercial Park. Condition number one of this approval required "only that area out- lined in red and shown on the Master Plan received by Staff on December 11, 1974 shall be developed for uses other than permitted in the Con- venience Business (B-l) District .... ". The developers are now request- ing that the area of the approved Conditional Use Planned Development 1. over be altered as shown on the accompanying site plan. Specifically, ~hat parcel designated for use as the Christian Book Company would be i~cluded under the provisions of the previously granted Conditional Use. In essence, Staff is of the opinion that permitting this request should have no substantial affect on either the spirit and intent of the previously granted Conditional Use for Planned Development or the over- all physical development of the parcel. As can readily be observed, the proposed office warehouse plan is compatible with the on-going develop- ment of the commercial park and in keeping with the previously approved zoning control. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of this reqeust is recommended subject to the implementation of the following conditions: Ail private drives and parking areas shall be paved, utilizing curb and gutter. e A buffer strip of not less than 35 feet shall be provided along the south property line in the interior 20 feet of which may be used for parking. This buffer strip shall be left in a natural state with the exception of cleared'areas (not to exceed 200 square feet), which shall be planted with evergreen trees or shrubs, hav- ing an initial height at planting of not less than 4 feet. e The site plan and renderings prepared by Borum/Watson Partnership Architects, dated 3/21/77, for the Christian Fellowship Publishers shall be considered the plan of development for the parcel in question. The conditions noted herein notwithstanding. 0 A solid board fence, having an archtectural appearance in keeping with the proposed structure shall extend along the west elevation from the office building to the warehouse. This fence shall be so designed as to break the monotony of the plane of the warehouse. This scheme shall be submitted and approved.by Staff prior to the issuance of any building permit. CASE HI'STORY AND PAST 'COMMIS'S'ION AND'~OARD' ACTION FOR' THI'S REQUEST. C.P.C. 6 21 77: It was resolved to recommend approval of an amendment to a Conditional Use for Planned Development, Cases 74S121 and ~74S122, subject to the implementation of the following conditions: Ail private drives and parking areas shall be paved, utilizing curb and gutter. D A buffer strip of not less than 35 feet shall be provided along the south property line-in the interior 20 feet of which may be used for parking. This buffer strip shall be left in a natural state with the exception of cleared areas (not to exceed 200 square feet), which shall be planted with evergreen trees or shrubs, having an initial height at planting of not less than 4 feet. The site plan and renderings prepared by Borum/Watson Partner- ship Architects, dated 3/21/77, for the Christian Fellowship Publishers shall be considered the plan of development for the parcel in question. The conditions noted herein notwithstanding. A solid board fence, having an archtectural appearance in keeping with the proposed structure shall extend along the west elevation from the office building to'the warehouse. This fence shall be so designed as to break the monotony of the plane of the warehouse. This scheme shall be submitted and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any building permit. e C ~ _/...: · : 8-2 iJJlt"t-Ii"l-tllll J July 27, 1977 (B:S.) CASE NUMBER: 77S127 APPLICANT: W. THOMAS MAYS, JR. REQUEST AND PROPOSED USE: turkey shoot. A Conditional Use to p~rmit the operation of a GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MkP IDENTIFICATION: In Bermuda Magisterial Dis- trict, this parcel lies 800 feet off the north line of West Hundred Road, measured from a point 1500 feet east of its intersection with Pine- bark Road. Tax Map 117-6 (1) Parcel 3 (Sheet 33). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING'LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approximately 67 acres, zoned Agricultural (A) and occupied by a gravel pit operation. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property to the north is zoned Community Business (B-2) and for.the most part, is vacant. Pro- perty to the east and west is zoned Agricultural (A) and is vacant or occupied by a mobile home. Property to the south, lying between this parcel and West Hundred Road, is zoned General Business (B-3) and is being used for commercial purposes. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND.EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Public water and sewer is not available for the proposed use. Soils on this parcel are gravelly, sandy loam and land wet, gently sloping to steep with a servere chance for erosion in some areas. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Development of the proposed use should have no detri- mental impact on either existing or future public facilities. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: This request will have no effect on the present traffic in this area. GENERAL PLAN: Property is designated for Agricultural use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant, who leases this land from Ray E. Grubbs, requests, a Conditional Use to permit the operation of a turkey shoot. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: This request represents a renewal of an existing permit to operate a turkey shoot. The permit was first granted in 1972 and was renewed in 1974~ Past renewal of this appli- cation was based 6pon conditions similar to those noted below. Staff in its review of the current application and upon inspection of the site, is of the opinion the operation has not proved a detriment to the area and it is being conducted in a reasonable and orderly fashion. No complaints with reference to this use have been received by our office. Staff is of the opinion that Condition #2 which allowed the use for a period of only three years should be amended to permit validity of 5 years. All other conditions are the same as required of other similar type operations within the County and should continue to be imposed. 1. over ASE HISTORY AND PAST 'COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION FORTH IS REQUEST. C.P.C. 6 '21''77: Approval of the request is recommended subject to the implementation of the following conditions: Prior to the continuance of the operation, Staff shalt be presented with written proof of the following: ae That the operator of the Turkey Shoot has obtained or is in the process of applying for a business license, as specified in Section 5-56 of the County Code. be That clearance from the Chesterfield Police Department relative to Section 7-11 of the County Code have been obtained. Ce That the Police Department has certified that this operation will not violate State and County Weapons Discharge Ordinances as would.be applicable-under Section 33.1-349 and Section 7-32 of the Acts of Virginia and Chesterfield County Code. de A clearance from the County Health .Department that the operation does not violate State Food and Drink Regulations and that proper facilities for the disposal of human waste are provided for as approved. This permit shall be valid for a period of five (5) ~ears, subject to review by the Board upon re-application for renewal. Hours of operation shall be restricted to between 9:00 A.M. and 12:00 -P.M. on F~day and Saturday. No Sunday operation shall be permitted. 4. The use of firearms shall be limited to shot guns only. 5. Alcoholic beverages shall be prohibited. _6. Ail parking areas and driveways shall be adequately graded and either paved or graveled. Parking spaces shall be-provided at a ratio of one space for every tw~o participants. 8. Each space shall be 10 feet by 20 feet in size. 9. Ail driveways and entrances shall be at 'least 25 feet in width. 10. Ail site,' layout and landscaping plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Community Development, prior to the issuance of any building permit, subject to the provisisions estab- lished by and set forth in Article 25, Chapter 17 of the County Code. t July 27, 1977 (B:S.) ~z~e- ~t7- ~- ~t~. ~. t~. 9 CASE NUMBER: 77S128 APPLICANT: ABRAM CARL MCDUFFIE GENERAL LOCATION AND TAX MAP IDENFITICATION: In Matoaca Magisterial District, this lot lies along the west line of Chinook Drive and is located 200 feet south of its intersection with Hickory Road. Tax Map 171-4 (2) Taylor Hall Estates, Section A, Blk A, Lot 4 (Sheet 47). ACREAGE, EXISTING ZONING, EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Approximately 1.5 acres in area, zoned Residential (R-7) and occupied by a single family dwellings. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Adjacent property is zoned Resi- dential (R-7) and is occupied by single family dwellings or remains vacant. UTILITIES, SOIL PROFILE, DRAINAGE AND EROSION, REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: This request will have no affect on utilities, soil, drainage and erosion, nor will it require any off-site easements. PUBLIC FACILITIES: Development of the proposed use will have no affect on either existing or future area public facilities. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: pattern in this area. This request will nOt affect the traffic GENERAL PLAN: Single family residential use. REQUEST ANALYSIS: The Applicant, who is the property owner, requests a Conditional Use'to permit a stock farm (to keep 2 horses) in a Resi- dential District. The Applicant states that the horses will be kept on the rear of the'property in a stable and that the stable is located approximately 90 feet from the closest dwelling and is cleaned regularly. ALTERNATIVES AND MITIGATING MEASURES: Upon review of the 'application and after inspecting the parcel, Staff has determined that in deed as stated by the Applicant, the stable area is located approximately 90 feet from the closest dwelling and it is maintained in a clean and orderly fashion; however, this use is in a relatively dense single family sub- division and Staff is of the opinion that the keeping of the horses in the manner now established on the parcel is not in the best interest of the Community. Even though the stable area was neat and clean, Staff did notice oder and flies as a result of this use. It is belived that at least the full use and enjoyment of adjacent properties (rear yards) would be hampered by the continuance of this stock farm. The stable is not located at the extreme rear of the subject parcel and the Commission may wish to consider requiring such relocation if it is felt that approval of the request is in order. However, Staff is of the opinion that this will still present a problem to adjacent properties to the north and west. Staff observed that only one horse is presently being kept on the parcel and the Commission may also wish to limit the use to keeping of a single horse.on the property. 1. over STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Denial of the request is recommended and the Appli- cant should be instructed to remove any horses kept on the parcel within 60 days of final determination by the Board of Supervisors. C.P.C. 6 21 77: CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND ~OARD' ACTION FOR THI'S REQUEST. It was recommended that the application be denied. e ]. =-17-15 il ~I'1 !1 COUNTY~OF CHESTERFIELD INTRACOUNTY CORRESPONDENCE IX, A, July 19, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Board of Supervisors Director of Data Processin~ Lease of IBM Mark Reader The Data Processinz Department has leased for three years, an IBM 3881 mark reader to process utilitv bills~ school scheduling, student ~rade reportin~ and several other applications. This machine eliminates the kevpunchin~ of data because it can read documents when properlv marked in pencil. The cost of this machine is $1805 mer month. The installation of the new IBM 370/138 is now compt&te and conversion of programs will be completed within the next few weeks. This makes it possible to attach the IBM mark reader directly to the computer and eliminate the magnetic tape unit previously used. There are several advantages in that editing can be done by the computer as the document is read. Another advantage is the reduction in cost. If we attach the 3881 mark reader directly to the computer and continue leasing from IBM we can save approximately $250 per month. If, however, we lease it through Commonwealth Advisers, as we did the'computer, we can save approximately $670 per month. Permission is requested to extend our present contract with Commonwealth Advisers to include the attachment of the mark reader and reduce the cost from $1805 per month to $1135 per month. Permission is also requested to have the County Attorney prepare any necessary contract modifications so this change can be implemented September 1, 1977. ECH/mm cc: Mr. Nick Meiszer COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD INTRACOUNTY CORRESPONDENCE July 19, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Board of Supervisors Elmer Hodge ~~ ~Z~ Director of Data Processing Approval of Invoice for Front End Charges Incurred in the Move to New Data Processing Facilities In a memo to the Board, written by Lee Falwell on January 7, 1977 concerning Bids for Data Processing Facilities, permission was requested to have the lessor make alterations required by Data Processing and bill the County for this work. Attached to the memo was an analysis of costs which I had pre- pared for Mr. Falwell. Mr. Falwell made this request because he wanted to move Data Processing as soon as possible, because of the extreme technical nature of the modifications, and because he did not want to involve a lot of my time as the general contractor. He felt this would also provide leverage in case problems did occur in future months. During the board meeting on January 12, I requested permission to occupy the Medical and Professional Building because it was the most desirable location and was the lowest bid. Initial costs for this building were estimated by me to be $45,605 which was part of the total cost approved by the Board on that day. This construction was completed by the lessor according to the specifications provided by me, my assistant director and my administrative assistant. The three of us were involved in the selection of all components and services. Although these components and services were not bid through General Services, there were, in all cases, at least two written quotations to assure proper control and lowest cost. The total initial cost of the new Data Processing facilities was $47,172.56. Although this action was approved by the Board and funds were appropriated, General Services is reluctant to provide a purchase order (required for approval of invoices) because they did not process the bids for initial construction. Permission is requested at this time to authorize General Services to provide the necessary purchase order or to authorize accounting to pay the invoice without a purchase order. Inasmuch as the processing of this transaction was not completed by the cutoff for FY 76-77, it may be necessary for the Budget Director to take action to get it into the proper accounting period. I will plan to have my assistant director and administrative assistant as well as all related documentation available to answer any questions you may have. ECH/mm cc: Mr. Nick Meiszer Mr. Jack Manual Mr. Lane Ramsey THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION S~HOULD BE MADE I__F_ THIS MATTER IS APPROVED, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD INTRACOUNTY CORRESPONDENCE July 21, 1977 Suggested resolution for Data Processing building costs carried over from 1976-77 budget: On motion of , seconded by , it is hereby resolved that $47,173 be appropriated from the Unappropriated Surplus of the General Fund to Planned Budget Expense account 737-01410-6001 Improvement to Sites. These funds were appropriated in the 1976-77 budget and were not expended. LBR/lga XIII, Be it resolved that the chargeable ~.dministrative cost of donated lkmds For the Purchase of Service Program under Title XX of the Social Security Act, be retained by the Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Depart- ment of Social Services in a Special Welfare Fund account; And be it f~rther resolved, that the Treasurers of the County of Chesterfield and the City of Colonial Heights be authorized to~ransfer from the Virginia Public Assistance account to the Special Welfare Fund the chargeable administrative costs of the state reimbursements designated for the service program; And ~rther, that the Treasurers be notified by the Department of Social Services, on a monthly basis, the amount of such chargeable administrative costs to be transferred. BOARD Of SUPERVISORS E. MERLIN O'NEILL. CHAIRMAN C. L. BOOKMAN GARLAND {)ODD COUNTY A ADMINISTRATION C. G MANUEL INTERIM COUNTY Agi~IN~STRATOR OF CHESTERFIELD ChESTErFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 July 12, 1977 Mr. C.G. Manuel Interim County Administrator County of Chesterfield Dear Mr. Manuel: During the Board of Supervisor's meeting of July 27, 1977, I would appreciate if you would present the attached request to the Board of Supervisors for their consideration. The District Chiefs would like to have permission to shoot fireworks during the annual fire show to be held October 15, 1977. As stated in the letter, Mr. Buddy Sprouse will be in charge of the display, whom in my opinion, is a very qualified shooter. Thank you for your interest. ~erely, Robert L. Eanes Chief of Department CHESTERFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT ST CHESTERFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT CHIEFS' ASSOCIATION CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia 2~8~2 Dear Sirs: The Chesterfield Fire Department is holding its fire show on October 1%, 1977, at ?:~Op.m. at the Fair Grounds. As in the pas~, we are planning to have a fire works display at about 9.00p.m. in the center of the track in front of the grandstands. We have asked Mr. Raymond M. Sprouse to be in charge of the discharge of the displays, and he has agreed to do it. We respectfully request that permission be granted for this display on the night of October 1%,1977. Thank you very much for your consideration of this request. Sincerely, /~. V. Bow&n, ~'"~'"?? ~/Chairman JJ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT SECTION 2-16 OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1975, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE DESIGNATION OF ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL ACCOUNTING BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 2-16 of the Code of the County of Chester- field, 1975, as amended, is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 2-.16. 'S'ame-'-Designation' 'of ~ep~9~ :assistant director; bonds Of department' membe-rs. The director of central accounting shall designate an assistant director who shall be an employee of the department of central accounting and who shall perform such duties as may be assigned to him from time to time by the director. The ~ep~ 'assistant director shall be covered by a bond as specified for the director. All other employees of central accounting shall be covered by bonds of not less than five thousand dollars conditioned upon faithful performance of duty and running in favor of the county. TO FROM : SUBJECT: FORM ASC$-204 (4-25-74) UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agrlculturat Stabilization and Conservaflo~ Service C. G. Manuel Acting County Administrator : Chesterfield County Date: July 12, 1977 Chesterfield, Virginian'S2'3832 InReplyReferto: Donal Breeding, CED ~ Chesterfield County ASCS Office PO Box AE, Chester, Virginia 23831 Request for Emergency A~sistance for Chesterfield County Farmers due to drought. Enclosed is a copy of the natural disaster damage assessment report for Chesterfield County. The County Emergency Board met Friday, July 8, 1977 and requested drought assistance for farmers in Chesterfield County. DATE: July 27, 1977 ~,,~0 TO: FROM: Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Dr. W. P. Wagner, Director Chesterfield Health 2e~t. At the recommendation of Mr. Bookman, an appointment was made with the County Personnel Committee on July 8, 1977, to dis- cuss turnover in staff personnel specifically sanitarians positions. Enclosed is a list of material given the Committee i. List of staff Sanitarians, length of employment and base pay budgeted- since revised July 1, 1977. 2. List of Sanitarians recently leaving and reason for leaving. 3. Revised pay scale. 4. Duties of Sanitarians 5. Proposals. After discussing the matter, the Committee recommended that we develop a Resolution for the Board to consider based upon our proposals. :.:ay 22, 1977 Present Staff- Sanitarians DATE EMPLOYED POSITION CHESTERFIELD HEALTH DEPART:.:E::T BASE PAY JULY 1977 REMARKS C~ R.G. 1966 Cope, S.J. 1961 San. Sup.A San. B ~Jester, J.W. 1971 San. B Jurgens, C.P. 9/76 Hudgins, D. R. 9/76 Baldwin, C.A. 1/77 Stepp, Dennis L. 6/77 San. A San. A San. A San. A San. A $14,328 $13,128 $12,000 $ 9,168 $ 9,168 $ 8,784 $ 8,784 $ 8,784 Transferred from Martinsvllle 1970; promoted May 1976 Food & Public Establish- o___ce- ments; retired e~ ~ U.S.A.F. Transferred from Heights 1973; promoted San. B 1976 ~' ~ i.; Degree-Forestry, '..-. general environmental Degree-Environmental Health, O.D.U. general environmental 40% time Chesterfield; U~v of Degree-Biology, .... Richmond; Food & Public Establishments Degree-Environmental Health, O.D.U.; general environmental Degree-B.S. Biology University of R!c ..... c..d Chesterfield Health Departr, ent Personnel recently~3ea~i~g sanitarian positions in Chesterfield D'i's't'r i c't: Starkey E~,p~_oxmcnt May 75 - April 77 Sept. 72 - March 77 ',','ilson 1962 - 1976 Burgess 1975 1976 Graham 1970 - 1975 1975 - 1976 1971 - 1975 1961 - 1975 SnelZon Reason for Leaving No promotional opportunities' pressure of job', inadequate $~.,,, ........ cost of furnishing own car Low pay; no future; cost of transportation Transferred to New Kent; closer home; less pressure at work Transferred to Henrico; no promoticn in foreseeable future Transferred to Powhatan; and less work pressure (Chesterfield & Colonial Hei%kts~ Husband transferred; no future Colonial Heights Powhatan May 12, 1977 Chesterfield Health Department Salary Range - July 1976 Sanitarian A 4B-744-$9168-$9600-$10,032-$10,$12-$10,992- $11,472-$12,000 , $12,528' Sanitarian B 4-940~$10,032-$10,512-$10,992-$11,47Z-$12,000- $12,528-$13,12~ $13,728' San. Sup. A -$-14)-,-$-1~-$10,992-$11,472-$12,000-$12,$28-$13,128- $1~,728-$14,~2~ $15,000~ San. Sup. B ~l-l-,~7-2-$12,000-$12,528-$15,128-$13,728-$14,528- $1S,000-$15,67% $16,400' The first merit increase is 6 months from date of employment; thereafter, 12 months if given adequate merit rating each year. * As of July 1, 1977 pay scale was raised by one step. May 12, 1977 Chesterfield Health Deparzmenz Duties of Sanitarian General Environmental Investigate complaints and follow through with appropriate action concerning trash, garbage, weeds, insect and rodents, housing, etc. Follow up on animal bites to see that the animal is confined properly and that the animal is in good health at the end cf confinement. Get laboratory samples and collect data concerning bites as needed. Hold rabies vaccine clinics. Inspect and advise on proper well construction. Take samples for bacterial analysis for all new homes having wells, and others as requested. Samples are taken routinely at public establishments. Inspect establishments as required by law. Evaluate soil for suitability for use of septic tanks and drainfields. Design individual sewage disposal systems. Inspect completed construction of these systems. Review plans for sewage treatment plants of less than g.p.d, capacity. Inspect construction. Inspect plants monthly and run appropriate tests to determine if plants are operating properly. Food and Public Establishments Inspect all food establishments as required by law and follow up as needed. Review plans on all new and remodeled food establishments. Make food outbreak investigations including sampling, and gathering data. Hold food seminars annually for all managers and othe~on request. Inspect milk and frozen products plants and sample products for bacterial analysis and proper pasteurization. Inspect other establishments as required by law. Establishments inspected as required by law: Restaurants School Cafeterias Service Stations Trailer Parks Su.~mer Camp s Homes for Aged ohl~m Care Ce~lters Sewage Treatment PlanTs Barber Shops Beauty Shops Counter Freezers Milk Distribution S~a~o~g Pasteurization Plants May 12, 1977 Chesterfield Health Department Proposal 1. The Board of Supervisors by Resolution request through the Legislators that the sanitarian pay scale be evaluated and appropriately raised to increase interest of qualified applicants. 2. The Board of Supervisors by Resolution request through the Legislators permission to subsidize health department personnel as an incentive to help maintain a well trained, experienced staff. 3. The Board of Supervisors furnish county automobiles and to be reimbursed at the normal rate set by the State - presently $75.00 plus 7~ per mile for less than 1,500 miles per month; or 12~ per mile for more than 1,500 miles per month. MINUTES XVI, PERSONNEL AND SALARY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Personnel and Salary Advisory Committee meeting 1:00 P.M. July 8, 1977 (June & July Meeting) MEMBERS PRESENT: Mrs. J. C. Girone Mr. G. Dodd Mr. C. G. Manuel Mr. R. B. Gal usha AGENDA ITEM #1: Mrs. G. Knoop, Director of Library Services, requested the Committee's concurrence to reclassify one Clerk Typist II, ~rade 5 to Technical Processing Clerk II, Grade 8. DISCUSSION: This request was considered during the May meeting by the Committee and denied as it was understood to be an additional position, not a reclassification of an existing position. The reclassification action will require no additional funds. The Committee was of the opinion that the reclassification was justified. COMMITTEE ACTION: The Committee recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the reclass- ification of one existing Clerk Typist I~,'Grade 5,'to TechHical Processing Clerk II, Grade 8 position. Action will be within present budget constraints, and will be effective on Board approval. AGENDA ITEM #2: Dr. Wagner and Mr. Spencer, Health Department, requested the Committee's support and gui. dance regarding their efforts to upgrade the scales for Sanitarians in order to retain qualified personnel. DISCUSSION: Dr. Wagner and Mr. Spencer advised the Committee that frequent turn-over in their Sanitacian staff has created a great deal of personnel turbulence within the Health Department, and they were concerned that efficiency was deteriorating. It was their opinion that low salary, and lack of career opportunity was the major causes. As possible solutions they requested the Committee to consider the following: That the Board of Supervisors by Resolution request through the Legislators that the sanitarian pay scale be evaluated and appropriately raised to increase interest of qualified applicants, That the Board of Supervisors by Resolution request through the Legislators permission to subsidize health department personnel as an incentive to help maintain a well-trained, experienced staff; Ce That the Boar~"of Supervisors authorize the C~ty to furnish automobiles for sanitaria..~ to be reimbursed by the State~ COMMITTEE ACTION: The Committee recommended: ae That Dr. Wagner and Mr. Spencer collect the facts and data for s~ch a Resolution as mentioned in a and b above, to present it to the Board to be incorporated in other data being gathered for Legislative consideration, and b. That the Board of Supervisors authorize the County to provide the Health Department with operational "turn-in" vehicles as available. AGENDA ITEM #3: Mr. Martin, Nursing Home Administrator, requested the Committee's consideration and concurrence to establish the position of Administrative Secretary, Grade 14. DISCUSSION: The Committee was of the opinion that Mr. Martin had justified the need for a secretarial assistant, however, the level of Administrative Secretary was inconsistent with stated responsibilities and County position classification p.ractices. COMMITTEE ACTION: The Committee recommended: a. That the position, Secretary, Grade ll, be established for the Nursing Home; b. That this action be taken within present budget appropration; Ce That this action be effective and conditional upon receipt of authorization to eliminate the existing position of Accountant I, or the reclassification of the existing Accountant I, Grade 14 position to Secretary, Grade 11, position. AGENDA ITEM #4: Mr. R. M. McElfish, Environmental Engineering, requested the Committee's consideration and concurrence for the following actions: a..Establishment of one additional Construction Inspector II position; b. Reclassification of existing Drainage Superintendent, Grade 16 position to Drainage Superintendent, Grade 19. DISCUSSION: Mr. McElfish advised the Committee that early in 1977 his departmental work load had increased to the extent that an additional inspector had been authorized, however, upon the relocation of the drainage section, one of the inspectors, who had been performing similiar functions for ~tilities7 remained with the Utilities, thereby creat, ing a shortage for mr. McElflsh. Mr. McElfish offered RESOLUTION ~'~ereas, there has historically been a considerable turnover in personnel in sanitarian positions in Chesterfield, and that five of the seven sanitarian positions have been replaced in the past twelve months, and ~ereas, there is a lack of incentive to keep sanitarians in Chesterfield, and Whereas, the salaries set by the State Merit Council are obviously insufficient to.attract and maintain an adequate, well trained staff, and Whereas, the Health Director has brought this matter to the attention of the Board of Supervisors and requested its help and support in adjustments and other incentives. Now, therefore, be it resolved, that the Board of Supervisors show its support by requesting the Legislators representing Chesterfield County to (I) cause the State Merit Council to review and make needed adjustments to the sanitarian's pay scale, and (2) request Legislative action to allow the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County to make supple- mental payments to Health Department Employees as it deems appropriate and necessary to maintain a full and qualified staff to fulfill the public health needs of the community. n addmtmon, due to the rise in cost of operating prmva~e ~automobiles for official business, the Board of Supervisors ~t~ ~will study the feasibility to furnish county 9ars ~or.~ ~/~Health Department use.~O CHESTERFIELD- COLONIAL HEIGHTS DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 2:~852 July 21, 1977 Mr. H. Edward James Administrative Assistant Department of General Services Chesterfield, Virginia 2B832 Dear Mr. James: At a meeting of the Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Board of Social Services heldthis morning, the Board approved the sale of the 1972 Ford 4 Door Sedan, I.D. ~2NSiFl16623, for $700; and the 1973 Ford Station Wagon, I.D. #3~2Sl18990, for $1000.OO. These are the effers which you quoted me in your memo of July 20. The vehicles are available at our Department and, of course, we would like a check as soon as the vehicles are turned over to the county. Sincerely, COMMUNITY CORPORATION Post Office Box 228 Chesterfield, Va. 23832 July 20, 1977 Office of the County Df~Linistrator County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, VA 23832 RE: Bingo/Raffle Permit Gentlemen: Enclosed is a check in the amount of ten dollars ($10.00) for reneval of our Bingo/Raffle permit which expires this month. Yours very truly, BERWICK V/ItAGE CON~4UNITY OORPORATION Ernest L. Bobertson ~sr F o~3z- ,d~27 ¢ CLOWN WEEK The"CLOWNS of AMERICA" the Greatest club on earth, has proclaimed this week, to be known as clown week. Whereas Clowns can make people forget their troubles, their afflictions, their handicaps & depressions. Whereas Clowning encourages laughter in the young, the old~ the rich, and the poor. Whereas Clowns can cut through bigotry ~ Class distinction. Now therefore '1 the week of. ..... do hereby proclaim ,t~ be "CLOWN WEEK" Given under my this hand at this city of.. day of_ Attest CHESTERFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT / CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA ROBERT L. EANES CHIEF Of DEPARtment July 25, 1977 Mr. C.G. Manuel Director of General Services County of Chesterfield Dear Mr. Manuel: As you recall, during the Board of Supervisors meeting on July 13, 1977, I was instructed to bring the recent request of Wagstaff for salaried firefighters to the attention of the District Chief's Association. On July 20, 1977, a committee selected to make a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors met with District Chief Anderson of Company #10, District Chief Vincent of Company #5 and District Chief Williamson of Company #11, and the following recommendations were made: Co. #5 Midlothian: Provide 3 each 3 man shifts plus 1 Company Commander Co. #10 Wagstaff: Provide 3 each 3 man shifts plus 1 Company Commander Co. #11 Chesterfield (formerly Dale) Give consideration to a like request in the next budget Also, the committee asked the Board to give consideration to the"Fire Station and Service District Location Plan" which indicated three (3) additional fire stations were needed by 1979. Thank you for your interest. Sincerely, ~f Departmen~~~~t CHESTERFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS E. MERLIN O'NEILL CHAIRMAN JOAN GIRONE. VICE CHAIRMAN C, L. BOOKMAN CLOVER HILL DISrRICT J, RUFFIN APPERSON GARU~ND' DOOD EERMUr)~-DISTRi(~T COUNTY CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 ADM{ N I STRATION C. G MANUEL iNTERIM COUNTY &DMINISTRATOR OF CHESTERFIELD July 25, 1977 Mr. C.G. Manuel Director of General Services County of Chesterfield Dear Mr. Manuel: During the Board Meeting of July 27, 1977, if time permits, I would appreciate you presenting the two attached suggested resolutions for consideration by the Board of Supervisors. As you know, former District Chiefs R.E. Osborne and C.H. Williams contributed an awful lot to the orderly progress of the Chesterfield Fire Department. Thank you for your interest. Sincerely, Chief of Department CHESTERFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT sr CHESTERFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA July 25, 1977 SUGGESTED RESOLUTION Former District Chief Charlie H. Williams Company #12 Ettrick Fire Department 1956-1976 Whereas, District Chief Charlie H. Williams has recently stepped down as District Chief of Company #12, gttrick, after serving in that capacity from 1974 through 1976. Whereas, Chief Williams has given freely of his time since joining the department in 1956 and served in all ranks of the'department, including President. Whereas, it is the desire of this Board to recognize his faithful service to the Chesterfield Fire Department and to spread this recognition upon the minute book of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County. Now therefore be it resolved that this Board publicly recognizes the long and distinguished service of District Chief Charles H. Williams and this Board extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County their appreciation for the twenty (20) years of service to the County. CHESTERFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA July 25, 1977 SUGGESTED RESOLUTION Former District Chief Robert E. Osborne Company #7 Clover Hill Fire Department 1950-1977 Whereas, District Chief Robert E. Osborne has recently stepped down as District Chief of Company #7, Clover Hill, after serving in that capacity since January 18, 1963. Whereas, Chief Osborne was one of only twelve (12) charter members who met on August 21, 1950, to organize the Clover Hill Fire Company and later served in various positions, including Lieutenant and Assistant Chief. Whereas, it is the desire of this Board to recognize his faithful service to the Chesterfield Fire De- partment and to spread this recognition upon the minute book of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County. Now therefore be it resolved that this Board publicly recognizes the long and distinguished service of District Chief Robert E. Osborne and this Board ex- tends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County their appreciation for the 27 years of service to the County. ThoRic, mond S mphony July 14, 1977 The Honorable E. Merlin O'Neill, Sr. 4906 Forest Hill Avenue Richmond, Virginia 23225 Dear Mr. O'Neill: Thank you for allowing me the time to appear before your Board meeting yesterday morning and especially for your favor- able action in supplementing by $2500 the appropriation for serv- ices of the Richmond Symphony for the school children of Chester- field County during the year 1977-78. The question was raised whether the contract should be between the Symphony and the School Board or between the Symphony and the Board of Supervisors. As I said at the meeting, it makes no difference to the Symphony. The services will be provided re- gardless of which is the other party to the contract. Because the services of the Symphony are being rendered more for the benefit of school children than others, it may be more appropriate for the contract to be with the School Board; but I am convinced it is legal in either instance. I will ask Mr. Manuel to request the appropriate County official to get in touch with the Symphony Manager to iron out the details. We of the Symphony are pleased that these services to approximately 17,000 Chesterfield students can continue and are grateful for the County's total appropriation of $17,500 toward the approximately $26,000 cost to the Symphony. TPB/amr Sincerely yours, P. So I cannot help but relay to you the comment made to me by Joan Briccetti during our return to Richmond after the meeting. She said "It certainly was nice to see so many smiling faces on the Board". JACQUES HOUTMANN, MUSIC DIRECTOR JOAN T. BRICCETTI, MANAGER 15 SOUTH FIFTH STREET RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219 (804) 788-1212 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA HENRICO-CHESTERFIELD-HANOVER CETA CONSORTIUM W, E. COLEMAN Adm:fl:,.tr~ for July 15, 1977 Mr. Jack Manuel ~ct:,.s County "~ "'-: '~' Cbc sterfield Courthouse Chesterfield, VA. ~3832 Dear Jack: %he CETA staff and I wish to formally express our appreciation for your assistance, guidance and cooperation during your tenure as L'.aerim County Administrator. The support we have received has not only made our job easier, but has made it possible to make substan- tial progress in resolving many of the problem areas. Your personal acc(~s$ibility to me and the staff for discussion of issues is also (tt,.:pl.,y .q)pi:cci,itcd, and I know that at. Limes there was a sacrifice on your part to make room for us on your schedule. :[:>lease accept our best wishes in your new endeavor, and we sLn- ccrcly hope that we can continue a close association with you. Sincerely, W. E. Coleman wgc/js cc: Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors 5621 :,o.. Lab;mum A~en,.o, k:cnn':~..C, Va. Z323 Aro~ Code 804-22,: ,o.~;