11-25-1987 MinutesBOARD OF S~'PERVISORS
November 2§, 1987
Supervisor~ in Attendance:
Mr. Karry G. Daniel, Chairman
Mr. Jesse J. Mayes, Vice Chairman
Mr. G. H. Applegate
Mr. R. Garland Dodd
Mrs. Joan Girone
Mr. Lane H. Ramsey
County A~ministrator
Staff in Attendance:
Mrs. Doris DeHart,
Legislative Coord.
MS. Joan Dolezal,
Clerk to the Board
Mr. Bradford S. Eammer,
Asst. Co. Admin.
Mr. William Howell,
Dir., Gen. Ser¥iee~
Mr, Thoma~ Jacobsen,
Dir. of Planning
Mr. Robert Masden,
Aset. Co. Admin. for
Hua~an Services
Mr. Jacob W. Mast, Jr.
Nursing Home Admin.
~r. R. J. ~cCraoken,
Transp. Director
Mr. Richard Mc~lfish,
Dir. of Env. Eng.
Mr. Steve Micas, Ce.
Attorney
Col. Joseph Pitt/nan,
Chief of Police
Mr. Richard Sale, Assr.
Co. Admin. for
Development
Ms. Jean Smith, Dir. of
Social Services
Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr.,
Dir. of Parks & Rec.
Mr. David Welchon$,
Dir. of Utilities
Mr. Frederick Willis,
Dir. of Human
Resource Management
Mr. Daniel called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
1. J~vOCATION
Mr. Daniel introduced Reverend F. Spencer Price,
Chester Baptist Church, who gave the invocation.
Pastor of
2. PI~EI~E OF ~TJ.I~GI.A.NCE TO 'r~u~ FLAG OF x~u~ ~]NI'~m STA~S OF
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of
America was recited.
3. APPROVALOF~k~u'r~S
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
approved the minutes of November 12, 1987, as submitted.
Vote: Unanimous
4. COUNTY ADMINIStRAtOR'S
Mr. Ramsey stated he had no comments at this time.
~r. App~egate reported Richmond ~nternational Ai~zt has
experienced increased levels of air passenger and cargo traffic
as compared with the percentages for the same period of 1986.
He invited the Board and staff to attend the rededication
ceremony for the Richmond International Airport on December 12,
1987.
Mr. Dodd commended Dr. E. E. Davis' recent efforts toward
reorganization of the School System's administrative staff;
however, be felt strongly that the restructuring process should
have included oonsideration for the salaries of the
reallocated/reclassified positions to be comparable to the
salaries of similar general County staff positions. It was the
consensus of the Board that a letter to the School Board be
drafted requesting that the salaries of the administrative
positions, affected by the reorganization of the School System,
be brought in line with similar positions of general County
administrative staff.
Mr. Daniel stated the merits of the water/sewer ordinance
relative to requiring public water and/or sewer facilities for
residential rezonings were discussed at great lengths at the
last Board meeting. He stated he has concluded that the
health, safety and welfare of the public may be severely
impaired unless these facilities are provided as conditions of
zoning. He added further that he will vote against all
raguests for residential rezonings that do not have provisions
for public water and/or sewer facilities. Mr. Mayas concurred
with Mr. Daniel's comments.
6. P~QUESTS TO POST~ONE ACTION, E~ERGENC¥ ADDITIONS OR
C~ANGES IN 'r~ ORDER OF PRESENTATION
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board
added Item 11.E.6., Transfer of County Property to Honorable
Sheriff Emmett L. Wingo; Item ll.F.6., Scope of Work for
Amendment of th~ Northern Area Plaq; and Item ll.L., tO be
heard in sequence following Item ll.H., Executive Session for
Consultation with Counsel and Staff regarding Legal Matters and
the Protection of the Privacy of Individuals, in Relation to a
Suspected Homocide, pursuant to Sections 2.1-344 (a) (6) and
(3), respectively, of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended;
and adopted the agenda, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
7. ~BOL~IONS ~ SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS
7.A. R~C0GNTZING DKL~GATR N. L~SLI~ SAUND~RS, JR. FOR HIS OUT-
STANDING CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, The Honorable N. Leslie Saunders, Jr. has
represented Chesterfield County and its citizens in the House
of Delegates with honor, distinction and endless hours of
dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Numerous achievement~ were reached during
Delegate Saunders' tenure in office such as:
o Chesterfield Charter Legislation which passed both
ho~ses of the General Assembly by unanimous vote,
o Chesterfield County received successful approval
for construction of the Powhite Parkway,
87-867
o The interchange of Route 288 at Route 10 and Five
Forks Was approved,
o Approval was obtained on the Route 36 grade
separation project in Ettrick,
o Environmental Impact Statement for Route 288 North
of Powhite was expedited,
o Widening of Bull Street Road between Genito Road
and Chippenham Parkway was approved, and
o Essential funding for improvements in the
Chesterfield County Jail were succec~fully obtained;
and
WHEREAS, These many accomplishments have greatly enhanced
the quality of life for all citizens of Chesterfield County;
and
WHEREAS, Delegate Saunders served with distinction and
with perfect attendance on the Governor's Coramission on
Transportation in the Twenty-First Century.
MOW, THEREFORE BE IT PJ~SOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors expresses deep appreciation for the outstanding
accomplishments of Delegate N, Leslie Baunders, Jr. to
Chssterfield County.
AND, S~ IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Delegate Saunders'
services will be sorely missed but his many outstanding deeds
will always be remembered with the greatest of pride.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Daniel stated the resolution would be presented to Delegate
Saunders at a dinner in his honor.
7.B. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR PARTICIPATION IN ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT VIDEO
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEt{EAS, The County of Chesterfield established an
Economic Development Program in 1978 for the expansion and
attraction of commercial, industrial and other business
opportunities within the County; and
WHEI~EAS, The County of Chesterfield and its business
community, striving together to enhance the quality of life for
its citizens and clientele, respectively, and in an effort to
increase business potential in the County, entered into a joint
venture to produce an ~conomic development video entitled,
"First Choice;" and
WNEREAS, Without the full cooperation, support and
expertise of Mr. L. Howard Jenkins, III, Mr. Kyle Woolfolk,
Dan Burger, Mr. Bryce Powell, Mr. Charles Macfarlane, Mr.
Giovanni Giussani, Chesterfield Business Council, Virginia
Power, C & P Telephone, Commowealth Gas, Investors Management
Group, Ltd., Centerpoint Associates, Waterford, Storer Cable
Co~unications and Lorenz Productions, the success of the
production of "First Choice" would have been virtually
impossible and impractical; and
WHEREAS, The COunty of Chestenfietd will utilize the video
presentation in its economic development promotional efforts to
increase and encouraqe quality business development; and
WHEREAS, The Board of Supervisors understands without the
vital working relationship established between the County and
87-868
the business community, sucsessful projects such as this would
be virtually impossible.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby extends its sincere
appreciation and gratitude to Mr. L. Howard Jenkins, III, Hr.
Kyle Woolfolk, Mr. Dan Burger, Mr. Bryce Powell, Mr. Charles
Macfarlane, Mr. Giovanni Giussani, Chesterfield Business
Council, Virginia Power, C & P Telephone, Commowealth Gas,
investors Management Group, Ltd., Centsrpoint Associates,
Waterford, Storer Cable Communications and Lorenz Productions
for support amd cooperation in the production of the economic
development video, "First Choice," and for the benefits which
may be reaped by Che$terfield County from these efforts of the
private business community who aspire with the County to
achieve only the best.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Daniel stated resolutions of appreciation will be presented
to each of the participants/contributors at the premiere
showing of the video on December 2, 1987.
7.C. MS. PR~/~CES F. SNELLINGS, UPON RETIREMENT FROM LUCY CORR
NURSING HOME
Mr. Willis presented Mr. Mast, Nursing Home Administrator, who
introduced Ms. Frances Snelllngs. He stated Ms. Smellings has
served the County for seventeen (17) years and in her capacity
has been a loyal and conscientious employee who will be missed.
On motion of the Board, the following remolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Ms. Frances F. Snellingm retired from the Lucy
Corr Nursing Home of Chesterfield County on October 31, 1987;
and
WHEREAS, Ms. Snellings has provided seventeen years of
quality s~rvice to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors
will miss Ms. Snellings' diligent service; and
WHEREAS, During her employment, Ms. Smellings served in a
dedicated manner as both a Nursing Assistant and Central Supply
Supervisor, manifesting loyalty and reliability of a superior
quality; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Smellings' professionalism continually set a
good example for her associate employees to follow while
maintaining an excellent relationship with staff members and
residents alike.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Ms. Frances F.
Smellings and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens
of Chesterfield County their appreciation for her service to
the Connty.
AND, BE IT FURTHER }~ESOLVED, that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Ms. Smellings and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers oi this
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia,
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Daniel presented the executed resolution to Ms. Smellings
and commended her for her service and dedication to the County.
87-869
MS. JOAN A. HEV~R$, UPON R~TIEEMENT FROM LUCY CORR NURSING
Mr. Willis presented Mr. Mast, Nu:sin9 Eome Administrator, who
introduced Ms. Joan Revers. He stated Ms. Revers has served
the County for fifteen (15} years and in her capacity has been
a loyal and conscientious employee who will be missed.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Ms. Joan A. Berets retired from the Lucy Corr
Nursing ~ome of Chesterfield County on September 29, 1987; and
WI~EI{EAS, Ms. Revers provided fifteen years of quality
service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
W}{~R~AS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors
will miss Ms. Revers' diligent service; and
W~RREA$, During her tenure of employment, Ms. Revers
served in a dedicated, dependable manner ms an employee and
supervisor in the Dietary Department, manifesting consistent
loyalty and reliability of a superior quality; and
WHEREASr Ms. Berets' ~ofsssional decorum continually set
a good example for her associate employees to follow while also
maintaining a good relationship with staff members and
residents alike.
NOW, THEREFORE BE %T RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Ms. Joan A.
Revers and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of
Chesterfield County their appreciation for her Service to the
County.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this
resolution be presented to MS. B~vers and that this resolution
be permanently recorded among the papers of this Hoard of
Supervisors Of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Daniel presented the executed resolution to Ms. Revers and
commended her for her service and dedication to th~ County.
7.E. DECLARING DECEMBER 7., 1987 AS "PEARL HAFneR REMEMBRANCE
DAY"
On motion of the Hoard, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, December 7, 1941 is truly a day that will live on
in infamy; and
WHEREAS, December 7, 1987 is the 46th Anniversary of that
fateful day; and
WHEREAS, The Pearl Harbor Survivor~ Association
dedicated by National Charter to assure that this and future
generations never forget the lesson of Dece~d~er 7, 1941 that
America must never again find itself unprepared against foreign
aggressors; and
WHEREAS, The 46th Anniversary of Pearl Karbor has special
significance because for the great majority of Pearl Harbor
survivors it represents the "last hurrah;" and
WHEREAS, It is imperative, especially in the light of
current world terrorism, that Americans never be allowed to
forget that eternal vigilance is the price of liberty; and
87-870
WHEREAS, The Pearl ~arbor Survivors Association is a
symbol of America's coa~itment to preparedness.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board cf Supervisors does hereby proclaim the seventh
day of December, one thousand nine-hundred and eighty-seven, as
"Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day" in Chesterfield County.
vote: Unanimous
7.F. ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION FROM AND RESOLUTION IN HONOR OF THE
CHESTEP~FIELD COUNTY NURSING HOME FOUNDATION
Mr. Masden introduced Mr. J. Ruffin Apperson, a past Board
member and President of the Chesterfield County Nursing Home
Foundation, who presented the Board with a donation for the
Nursing Home, in the amount of $9,123.6~.
On motion of the Board, the Board accepted a donation from the
Chesterfield County Nursing Hom~ Foundation, in the amount of
$9,123.63, for the Nursing Rome and adapted the following
resolution:
WHEREAS, The Chesterfield County ~urslng Home Foundation,
Inc. was founded to aid and promote the best interest and
welfare of the Chesterfield County Nursing Home; and
WHEREAS, In 1969 in accordance with such goals, the
Foundation accepted certain property bequeathed by Austin
Minnie to the Nursing Home, the Children's Home of virginia
Baptists, Inc. and Richmond Children's Hospital; and
WHEREAS, The Foundation has managed this property since
that hime and has now sold this property for the benefit of the
Nursing Home; and
WHEREAS, The Foundation has performed other services,
raised other funds and otherwise supported the Nursing Rome for
the past eighteen years.
NOW, THER~FOR~ B~ IT R~SOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County publicly recognizes the
Chesterfield County Nursing Rome Foundation and extends on
behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County,
particularly the elderly~ its appreciation for its service to
the Ceunty.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this
reselution be permanently recorded among the papers ef this
Board.
Mr. Daniel presented the resolution to Mr. Apperson in
recognition and appreciation of the Foundation's servlom to the
County. Mr. Appersen recognized Ms. Jean Smith, Secretary of
the Foundation, and Mrs. Jean Girone, Midlothian District
Supervisor, who served on the Foundation's Board of Directors,
?.G. DEDICATION OF NEW HUMAN SERVICES BUILDING AS "WAGNER
BUILDING"
On motion of the Boa~d, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, William P. Wagner, M.D. joined the State/Local
Health Service System on Ma~eh 31, 1955; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Wagner was appointed as Director of the
Chesterfield Health District on October 1, 1957; and
87-871
WHEREAS, Dr. Wagner has provided exemplary direction and
leadership for the Chesterfield County Health Department as
well as dedicated and faithful medical services to the citizens
of Chesterfield County from 1957 until his retirement in 1985;
and
WHEH~AE, Dr. Wagner, through his insight and devotion was
instrumental in planning for these new facilities for the
Health and Social Services Departmentz.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ~ESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County that William P. Wagner, M.D. is hereby
commended for his many years of faithful and dedicated service
to the citizens of Chesterfield County.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, t//at the Board expresses its
sincere appreciation for Dr. Wagner's service to the County and
hereby designates the new facility located at 9501 Lucy Corr
Drive as the "Wagner Building" in his honor and as a token of
the esteem in which he is held by Chesterfield County and its
citizens.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Daniel stated the resolution will be presented to Dr.
Wagner at the Building Dedication Ceremony on December 2, 1987.
7.H. PRESENTATION TO TNE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PARKS AND P~ECREA-
TIQN DEPARTMENT BY EASTER SEAL SOCIETY OF VIRGINIA, INC.
Mr. Masden introduced Ms. Jennifer Taylor, Field Representative
for the Easter Seal Society of Virginia, Inc., who presented
Mr. Stith, Director of Parks and Recreation, and Mr. Cares,
Senior Recreation Specialist, respectively, with a plaque
recognizin9 and commending the Chesterfield County Department
of Parks and Recreation for their support of service for
children and adults with disabilities.
8. ~EAP~TNGS OF CITiZeN8 ON UNSCHEDULED MATTER OK CLA]~4S
8.A, MS. LINDA SHIHLDS~ CONGREGATIONS AROUND RICHMOND INVOLVED
TO ASSUR~ S~L~LT~R
Ms. Linde Shields, President of Congregations Around Richmond
Involved to Assure Shelter (CARITAS), presented a brief
overview of the organization, its purpose, etc., and requested
$5,000 in financial assistance from the County to provide
transportation of the homeless from The Emergency Shelter, Inc.
center in Richmond to the various CARITAS shelter sites, many
of which are located in Chesterfield County. She introduced
approximately 12 people, representing ares churches within the
County, who were present in support of the request.
Mr. Mike Tyson, social worker from Epiphany Catholic Church and
a member of CARITAS, stated he was reDresenting parishioners of
Epiphany Catholic Church, Stoney Pointe Reform Presbyterian
Church, St. Edward's Catholic Church, South Minister
Presbyterian Church, and First Congregation United Church of
Christ who wish to provide shelter for the homeless at their
churches. 5e requested the Beard appropriate $5,000 to assist
with the transportation of the homeless f~om the street center
in the City to the various County church ehelter sites. He
presented a petition to the Board signed by approximately 827
Chesterfield residents in support of this action. He stated
CARITAS feels the plight of the homeless is the ~espon~ihility
of all people and they, as well as their needs, can no longer
be ignored.
Mr. Daniel stated no official action could be taken on the
request by the Board at this time; however~ the matter would be
87-872
taken unde~ advisement and passed on to the County Administra-
tor for appropriate recommendations. Mr. Applegate suggested
that consideration be given to appropriating $1,000 from each
~agisterial District Three Cent Road Fund account to finance
the request. Mr. Mayes concurred with Mr. Applegate's oormments
and stated many of the homeless are victim~ of administrative
acts designed to reduce/satisfy gover~ental deiicits and it
would be the humanitarian responsibility of the County to bear
its portion of this responsibility. Mr. Daniel stated the
District Three Cent Road Funds could be considered in the
recommendation to the Board.
When asked, Mr. Micas stated he wcnld ~ubmit recorm~endations to
the County Administrator regarding ~_he use of District Three
Cent Road Funds, as well as any legal c0n~e~ns.
8.B. GOVERNMENT LEASING RELATING TO STATE POLICE 5ANGAR F, EVENUE
BONDS
Mr. Pertheraos stated, at the direction of the Board, the County
instituted legal proceedings to recover damages to which it is
entitled from Government Leasing Corporation for breach of
contract when the company failed to comply with their bid to
complete financing ~elating to State Police hangar revenue
bonds. Be stated Government Leasing Corporation has filed a
ecunterolalm against the County, pursuant to Section 15.1-544
of the Code of Virginia, contending that the County, not
Government Leasing, breached the contract. He stated, upon
investigation, staff has determined this contention is
meritless, i~ inconsistent with all of the documentation
connected with the bidding process and recommends the claim be
denied.
Mr, John Douglass, representing Government Leasing Corporation,
stated Government Leasing was at all times ready, willing and
able to perform a service to the County by ~inancing the
project through a lease-purchase format in accordance with its
bid and believes acceptance of said proposal would have been
most economical for the County. He requested an expeditious
disposition of %he counterclaim so %hat parties involved may
pursue their claims through the appropriate legal channels.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
denied the claim of Government Leasing Corporation that
Chesterfield County breached its contract to allow said
Corporation to provide revenue bond financing for construction
of a State Police hangar at the County Airport.
Vote: Unanimous
9. D~FERRED I~
There were no deferred items for consideration at this time,
10.A. AN 0ND~NANCE TO A~END THE CODE OF TEE COUNTY OF CHESTER-
FIELD! 1978~ AS AMENDED~ BY ADDING SECTION 5-1.1:1,
P~ELATING TO TRESPASS BY ~OWL
Mr. Micas stated this date and time had been advertised for a
p~blic hearing tO Consider an ordinance, relating to trespass
by fowl which he briefly explained.
Mn. Milton Cooper voiced opposition to the proposal as he felt
it would place a hardship on those individuals who own fowl and
would be expensive £Q~ the County to enforce. Ee presented the
Board with petitionm containing approximately 65 signatures of
citizens in opposition to the ordinance.
87-873
Mr. Ben Lingerfelt, a resident of the Midlothian District,
voiced opposition to the proposed ordinance as he felt it was
prejudiced and unenforceable. He stated chickens serve many
beneficial purposes and it would be costly, difficult and
impractial to fence or cag~ th~m.
Mr. Leslie Baker voiced opposition to the proposed ordinance.
He stated he raises mallard ducks, geese and chickens on his
farm and it would be most difficult to contain them.
Mr. Paul W. Miles, a resident of New Kent County, stated fowl
is a tremendous resource in Virginia and the human Society,
which indicates caging animals is cruel and inhumane, would
give owners difficulties regarding compliance with this
ordinance. Be added approval of this ordinance in Chesterfield
could result in the same type ordinance being approved in other
jurisdictions, and he felt it would place unfair burdens on
small poultry breeders.
Mr. Henry Robinette, a resident of Bermuda District, stated he
agreed with the concept of not damaging each others~ property
and feels a "good neighbor" policy would resolve such problems.
He voiced opposition to the proposed ordinance because many
people consider fowl as pets/companions for therapy of those in
poor health or as a hobby, raise them for economic benefits,
etc., and requested the ordinance be denied.
W~en asked, approximately fifteen (15) persons Stood in support
of denying the proposed ordinance.
Mr. Daniel stated he had not supported the scheduling of the
public hearing on the proposed ordinance. Be stated the
concern which precipitated this issue was regarding damage
inflicted on an individual's property as a result of fowl
trespass; however, the proposed ordinance, as drafted, does not
address the damage aspect of the issue. He stated he did not
feel government has the total responsibility to influence/solve
all disputes among individuals.
Mr. Mayes commended Mr. Robinette's statements regarding a
"good neighbor" policy because, if such a policy existed there
would be no need for an ordinance. He stated the intent of the
proposed ordinance is to provide protection to those
individuals with gardens, etc., from the trespass of fowl owned
by others and to prevent fowl from running et large upon other
people's property and On public highways, without individuals
having to seek compensation through and hear the co~t~ of legal
action in court.
Mr. Dodd stated he understands the concerns of those who own
fowl and feels their concerns are important. He stated if
owners of fowl who are concerned with their rights and the
rights of others would not let their animals run at large,
destroy property, etc., this action would not be necessary. He
stated the proposed ordinance, if approved, would be enforced
On a complaint basis only.
Mr. Applegate stated he had not supported the scheduling of a
public hearing on this matter, and he felt there were more
important issues that needed the Board's attention. Be stated
he would not support the proposed ordinance, as he felt there
are a tremendous number of laws that need to be repealed, and
the governing body needs to get on with the tasks of building
schools, balancing the budget, providing for public safety,
etc.
Mrs. Girone stated she felt it is not the role of govenment to
become involved in this issue, and she would not be in favor of
the ordinance.
87-874
When asked, Mr. Micas stated private property owners have the
right to not have their property destroyed by other~ and if
that person could demonstrate that someone's fowl had damaged
his property, theoretically, that person could pursue the
matter through legal channels.
After further discussion, it was on motion of Mr. Mayer,
seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved to adopt the following
ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD,1978, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING SECTION 5-1.1:1,
P~ELATING TO TRESPASS BY FOWL
BE tT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
Sec. 5-1.1:1 Tres ass b fowl.
It shall be unlawful for any person to per, it fowl owned
or possessed by such person to trespass upon property owned by
others or to run at large upon the public highways.
For ~tate law permitting local trespass ordinances
See Section 15.1-512
Ayes: Mr. Mayes and Mr. Dodd.
Nayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Applegate, and Mrs. Girone.
10.B. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TEE CODE OF TEE COUNTY OF
~S~ERFIELD, 1978~ AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING SECTION
20-1.4 AND ADDING SECTION 20-1.11:1 AND SECTION
20-1.14:1, RELATING TO USE OF WATER AND SEWER
SERVICES
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearln9 to amend the ~, relating to the use of
water and sewer services. Ne stated the purpose of this
amendment is to revise/expedite the application procedure for
new water/sewer services by terminating the USe of the written,
customer-signed applications and incorporating the certain
terms/conditions of service in the water/sewer ordinance which
he briefly explained.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the
proposed ordinance.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF CHESTE~IELD,
1978t AS AMENDED~ BY AMENDING SECTION 20-1.4
AND ADDING SECTION 20-1.11:1 AND SECTION 20-1.14:1,
RELATING TO USE OF WATER AND SEWER SERVICES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Chapter 20 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, Virqinia is amended and reenacted by muending the
following sections:
20-1.4 Collection of utilities accounts.
OOO
(c) if a consumer's utilties account remains unpaid such
that the County must file a judicial action to
recover the amount owed, the consumer will be
responsible for paying all collection costs incurred
in collecting this account, including reasonable
attorneys fees.
87-875
(2) That Chapter 20 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, virginia is amended and reenacted by adding the
following sections:
20-1.11:1 Level of Service.
By providing water and sewer services to residents of the
County, the County does not guarantee or a~sume responsibility
for uninterrupted service nor does it guarantee any specific
water pressure.
20-1.14=1 Relocation of Meter Reading Facilities.
The consumer shall be responsible for payment of all costs
associated with the raising or lowering of meter boxes er other
meter reading equipment, due to any change in grade levels of
property served by the utilities system.
(3} That these changes shall become effective upon
passage.
Vote: Unanimous
10.C. THE CONVEYANCE OF REAL PROPERTY AT CHALKLEY ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL FOR OP~93kTION 0P E00D CONCESSIONS
Mr. Masden stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider the conveyance of real property at
Chalkley Elementary School for the operation of food
concessions.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the
proposed conveyance.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded b~ Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
necessary documents for a lease agreement with the Chalkley
Athletic Association for a three (3) year period (January 1,
1987 to December 31, 1989) at the Parks and Recreation Complex
located at Chalkley ~lementary School for the operation of food
concessions.
vote: Unanimous
11. ~W BHSI~SS
ll.A. APPROPRIATION OF OVERTIME PUNDS FOR POLICE TRAFFIC
CONTROL AT CLOVER HILL HIGH, MANCEESTER HIGH AND HENNING
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
Chief Pittman stated as a result of concerns for the safe
ingress/egress of school buses and motor vehicle traffic at
certain schools in the County resulted in the request of
concerned citizens and direction by the County Administrator,
the Police Department has placed eight police officers to
direct traffic at Manchester High, Clover Hill High and Henning
Elementary Schools. He stated, in addition, the Police
Department, the County Transportation Department, Virginia
Department of Transportation and the School Administration are
seeking alternatives to assigning police officers for this
service. He stated it was generally agreed the situation at
Midlothian Middle School could be remedied by reconfiguration
of the bUS ramp, which action is agreeable to School
Administration; VDOT has agreed to study the eastern exit from
the bus ramp at Manchester High School, close the ramp exiting
the 360 West Shopping Center, move that exit to the next
western ramp and install a signal light which effort would
alleviate the traffic cengestlon on the ramp at Manchester High
School but such action cannot be accomplished until 1988; the
87-876
other schools' problems cannot be relieved/resolved without the
use of police staff. He stated VDOT stated the problems at the
remaining schools did not meet the criteria to warrant the
installation of traffic signals and, regardless of who pays th~
cost, traffic signals cannot be installed unless the situation
meets the 8tare criteria. He stated there are currently no
overtime funds budgeted for officers tO be assigned for traffic
control at the designated school sites.
Mr. Applegate expressed concern that VD0~ has indicated the
existing traffic situation at Clover Hill 5iqh School does not
meet the criteria to warrant the installation of a traffic
signal. He stated this area im heavily traveled, particularly
by trucks, and is potentially hazardous at all times, and it is
incumbent upon the Board to provide a mechanism to protect the
safety and welfare of the citizens of the County, not only in
this area but County-wide. He stated he felt an alternative
means for resolving the situation could be devised without
having to utilize off-duty police officers.
Mr. Dodd stated he felt the traffic control issue will become a
more serious problem in the future and there will be more
requests for Police traffic control services at schools to
improve ingress/egress and circulation patterns. He stated
he felt thia issue should be brought to the attention of the
County's Legislative Delegation.
Mr. Applegate stated it appears the only feasible recourse at
this time is to take the necessary action to provide the
funding for Police officer traffic control at the subject
locations. Mr. Daniel concurred.
Mr. Mayes stated he concurred also, but he did not feel the
traffic/safety problems were unique to one area of the County
and that theme problems should be studied County-wide. When
asked, Chief Pitt~man indicated there are traffic problems at
various schools County-wide; however, the schools being
discussed a~e those at which there are currently significant
safety problems.
Mrs. Gironc asked if the Midlothian Middle School PTA was in
agreement with the reconfiguration of the bus ramp to improve
the traffic situation at the mchool. Chief Pittman stated the
matter would be dicussed further with the principal at that
school. He added, if this solution does not resolve the
problem, staff will come back to the Board with alternative
recommendations.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and appropriated $64,800 from the General Fund Balance
to the Police Department budget for overtime funds for Police
traffic control at Clover Hill Sigh, Manchester High and
Henning Elementary SchoolE; and inmtruoted mtaff that the
Midlothian Middle School traffic situation be brought back to
the Board for ~i~ilar treatment a~ Clover Mill Sigh, Manchester
High and Henning Elementary Schools if the proposed solution,
as discussed, is not satisfactory; that the traffic/safety
problems at school locations should be studied County-wide; and
that staff include in the proposed Legislative program a
request that the County have a voice in the established
criteria for and installation of traffic lights on the roads
within its own boundaries regardless of who is paying the cost.
Vote: Unanimous
ii.B. SPACE COMMITTEE P~EPORT A/~D ~COMM~MDA~ION$
Mr. ~ammer stated the Board Space Committee has reviewed and
s~udied various staff proposals regarding office space in the
County government complex, and he presented a brief overview of
the Co~ittee'~ report and recommendations relative to the
87-877
reuse of various office buildings and the planning/construction
of new faeilitee to provide required office space in the
future.
After a brief discussion, it was on motion of Mr. Maye$,
seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that the Board approve the
recommendations of the Board Space Committee to reallooate
space at the Couthouee in existing building structures for
those departments who are experiencing overcrowded conditions,
as follows:
1. Reuse of the Old Health Department Building by the Police
and Fire Departments and Credit Union (Completion date:
January/February, 1988);
2. Reuse of the vacated space freed up £rom the Courts
Building for use by the Police Department. Project will
also include expanded public meeting room. (Completion
date: To be determined at futnre meeting};
3. Continued replacement and relocation of the Warehouse
facilitiem to be phased over a three-year basis.
(Completion date: Already approved first module
construction, with future module construction to be
brought back to the Board on individual basis);
And further, the Board approved the concept for:
4. Planning, design and construction of a Community
Development ~uildinq to be financed by Utility Revenue
Bonds. (Completion date: In conjunction with CIP Utittiee
Bond Referendum submittal); and
5. Initial planning and study of a new Mental Health Annex
Suilding to supplement existing facilities for Chapter X
employees. (Completion date: In conjunction with CIP
Utilities Bond Referendum submittal).
Vote: Unanimous
Mrs. Girone expressed concern regarding expenditures for
private architectural and/or consultant contracts and stated
she felt existing staff should be utilized more often on
projects such as this.
ll.C. AWARD OF ARCHEOLOGY CONTRACT TO VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH
UNIVERSITY ARCHEOLOGY ~SEARCH CENTER FOR MAGNOLIA GRANGE
SITE PROJECT
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. ~ayes, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
necessary documents awarding an archeology contract to Virginia
Commonwealth University Archeology Research Center to conduct
Phase I of an archeology survey of t_he Magnolia Grange site to
determine the presence of historically significant artifacts
and/or archeological sites. (It is noted virginia Commonwealth
University Archeology Research Center will assume the cost of
Phase I, which will be approximately $5,000 to $6,000; however,
subsequent phases will require County participation, if
approved by the Board, and a source of revenue will have to be
identified.)
ll.D. APPOINTMENTS
ll.D.1. PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
nominated Dr. Bruce E. Fleming to serve on the Personnel
87-878
Appeals Board, whose formal appointment will be made December
9, 1987.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.D.2. JAMES RIVER PORT STUDY TASK FORCE
0n motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Beard
nominated Mr. Richard F. Sale, representing Chesterfield
County, to serve on the James River Port Study Task Force,
whose iormal appointment will be made December 9, 1987.
ll.D.3. METROPOLITAN RICHMOND CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
nominated Mr. Charles J. Blankenship to serve as an alternate
on the Board of Advisors of the Metropolitan Richmond
Convention and Visitors Bureau, whose formal appointment will
be made December 9, 1987.
11.D.4. CHESTEP~IELD COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. ~ayes, the Beard
nominated Mrs. Patricia Borinski and Mrs. Mary JO LUX,
representing Matoaca and Clover Hill Magisterial Districts,
respectively, to serve on the Chesterfield Community Services
Board, whose formal appointments will be made December 9, 1987.
It was noted special appreciation should be extended to Dr.
Pettus for his diligent, dedicated s~rvice during his tenure on
the Community Services Board.
ll.D.5. COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS RESOURCES BOARD
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the ~oard
nominated the following people to serve on the Community
Corrections Resources Beard (CCRB), whose formal appointments
will be made December 9, 1987:
Mr. Gary K. Johnson
Ms. Sandra Lee Starkey
Mr. Duane C. Watson
ll.E. CONSENT ITEMS
ll.E.1. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Apple Orchard Road, Apple Orchard Terrace and
Apple Orchard Court in Woodfield, Clover Rill District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mrs. Girone,
seconded by Mr. Mayes, it is resolved that Apple Orchard Road,
Apple Orchard Terrace and Apple Orchard Court in Woodfield,
Clover Hill District, be and they hereby are established as
public roads.
87-879
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into
the Secondary System, Apple Orchard Road, beginning at the
inbersectlon with Turner Road, State Route 650, and running
westerly 0.04 mile to the intersection with Apple Orchard
Terrace, then continuing westerly 0.07 mile to the
intersection with Apple Orchard Court, then continuing
westerly 0.09 mile to end in a ~ul-de-sae; Apple Orchard
Terrace, beginning at the intersection with Apple Orchard
Road and running northerly 0.04 mile to end in a cul-de-sac;
and Apple Orchard Court, beginning at the intersection with
Apple Orchard Road and running northerly 0.14 mile to end in
a cul-de-sac.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight
distance and designated Virginia Department of
Transportation drainage easements.
These roads serve 38 lots.
And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a
50' right-of-way for all of these roads.
Woodfield is recorded as follows:
Plat Book 54, Pages 43 and 44, September 17, 1986.
Vote: Unanimous
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Donegal Drive, Lenadoon Drive, Blue Stack Court
and D~rryveach Drive in Donegal Glen, Section One, Matoaca
District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mrs. Girone,
seconded by Mr. Mayes, it is resolved that Donegal Drive,
Lenadoon Drive, Blue Stack Court and Derryveach Drive in
Donegal Glen, Section One, Matoaca District, be and they hereby
are established as public roads.
And b~ it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into
the Secondary System, Donegal Drive, beginning at the end of
existing Donegal Drive, State Route 1275, and going westerly
0.04 mile to the intersection with Lenadoon Drive, then
continuing westerly 0.06 mile to the intersection with
Derryveach Drive, and then going northwesterly 0.05 mile
ending in a cul-de-sac; Lenadoon Drive, b~ginning at the
intersection with Donegal Drive and going northerly 0.07
mile to the intersection with Blue Stack Court, and
continuing northerly 0.04 mile ending in a cul-de-sac; Blue
Stack Court, beginning at the intersection with Lenadoon
Drive and going northerly 0.09 mile ending in a cul-de-sac;
and Derryveach Drive, beginning at the intersection with
Donegal Drive and going southwesterly 0.03 mile to end at the
tie-in with proposed Derryveaoh Drive, Donegal Glen, Section
Two.
This request is inclusive o£ the adjacent slope, sight
distance and designated Virginia Department of
Transportation drainage easements.
These roads serve 42 lots.
And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a
50' right-of-way for all of these roads.
This section of Donegal Glen is recorded as follows:
87-880
Section One. Plat Book 49, Pages 50 & 51, May 28, 1985.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.E.2. APPROPRIATION FOR HISTORIC MARKER FOR VIRGINIA'S FIRST
RAILWAY
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. ~ayes, the Board
appropriated $850.00 ( $216. from the Midlothian District
Street Light Fund and $534. from the Midlothian District Three
Cent Road Fund) to the Chesterfield Historical Society for a
historic marker commemorating Virginia's first railway which
operated in Chesterfield County in the 1830's, which marker
would be located either on the median strip in front of the
Robious Hall Shopping Center at Moorefield Park or to the west
of the Pocono Green Shopping Center, both of the proposed sites
being located on Route 60, approximately 1/4 mile bstween the
two points.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.E.3. COMPENSTION FOR CAPITAL ttEGION AIRPORT COMMISSION
MEMBERS
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board
increased the annual compensation for Chesterfield County
representatives to the Capital Region Airport Commission from
$2,400 to $3,000 per year per person, effective January 1,
1988; and appropriated $1,200 from General Fund Balance to
cover this increase.
i1.E.4. 1988 HOLIDAY SCHEDULE
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr.
approved and authorized the following
qovernment employees during 1988:
New Year's Day
Lee-Jackson/Martin Luther King, Jr. Day
Washington's Birthday
Memorial Day
Independence Day
Labor Day
Col~rmbus Day
Veteran's Day
Thanksgiving Day
Day After Thanksgiving
Christmas Eve
Christmas Day
Vote: Unanimous
The Board requested staff provide a
Mayas, the Board
holidays for County
January 1, 1988
January 18, 1988
February 15, 1988
May 38, 1988
July 4, 1988
Septen%ber 5, 1988
October 18, 1988
November 11, 1988
November 24, 1988
November 25, 1988
December 23~ 1988
December 26, 1988
standard policy for
determination of the yearly holiday schedule.
ll.E.5. REQUESTS FOR BINGO/RAFFLE PERMITS
On motion of Mrs. Girona, seconded by Mr.
approved requests for bingo/raffle permits
organizations for calendar year 1988:
ORGANIZATIONS
The Richmond James River Lions Club
Mayas, the Board
for the following
TYPE OF PERMIT
Bingo & Raffle
87-881
St. Edward-Eplphany's Home and School
Aseoeiation
Optimist Club of Chesterfield
Beach Community Grange No. 958
Monacan Athletic Boosters
St. Augustine Catholic Church
Clover Eill Sports, Inc.
St. Edwards Knights of Columbus #6546
Manchester-Richmond Lodge 9699
Loyal Order of MOOse
Robert E. Lee - Post 2239
Veterans of Foreign Wars
Vote: Unanimous
Bingo & Raffle
Raffle
Bingo
Raffle
Bingo
Raffle
Bingo & Raffle
Bingo & Raffle
Bingo & Raffle
I1.~.6. TRANSFER OF COUNTY PROPERTY TO TH~ HO~0PQ%EL~ SB~RIFF
EMMETT L. WINGO
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seoonded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
approved the transfer cf County property in the form of a Smith
and We~eon thirty-eight caliber revolver (serial number
5K45215) to Sheriff Enunett L. Wingo, upon his retirement, which
he has utilized over twenty (20) years in the performance of
his duties aK Sheriff of Chesterfield County and which revolver
is no longer the standard used by County law enforcement
personnel.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.F. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS
ll.F.1. STP~EET LIGHT INSTALLATION COST APPROVAL
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved the street light installation cost for the
intersection of 01d Gun Road West and Silbyrd Drive, in the
a/dount of $274.00, which funds are to be expended from the
Midtothian District Street Light Fund.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.F.2. STR~T LIGHT ~EQU~ST
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
approved the installation of street lights at the following
locations, with funds to be expended from the Bermuda District
Street Light Fund:
1. Dead end of Mountclair Road;
2. Intersection of Jefferson Davis Highway and 8and ~ills
Drive;
Intersection of Pine Meadow Circle and Sand Kills Drive;
and
4. 1521 Walnut Drive.
97-882
ll.F.3. ACCEPTANCE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OPTION AGREEMENTS FROM
ROURTCO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND FIVE FORES LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP AND AUTHORIZATION FOR COUNTY ADMINISTRA-
TIO~ TO E~T~ND OPTION
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
necessary documents accepting an assignment of option
agreements from Kourtco Limited Partnership and Five Fork~
Limited Partnership to acquire approximately 182 acres for
$2,450,000 located adjacent to the County Airport and is to be
used for expansion of the Chesterfield County Industrial Park
and extension of a second access road; and appropriated $40,000
from the Airport Industrial Park Fund and approved the
expenditure of said funds for the extension of the option
period (for two months for $20,000 per month) on the contract
to purchase said property. (A copy of the Option Agreements
and the plat are filed with the papers of this Board.)
ll.F.4. MODIFICATION OF PURCHASE AG~EMENT TO SELL LAND IN
AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL PARK TO TERRY T. FIELDS
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
approved a modification of a purchase agreement for the sale of
a four (4) acre tract on Whitepine Road in the Airport
Industrial Park to Mr. Terry T. Fields, which purchase price is
reduced by $14,600, and which monies are to be applied toward
the sonstruction of a 360 linear foot base road, to bo built in
accordance with County specifications, for temporary u~e until
the County completes its road development, with the provision
of a performance bond guaranteeing completion within nina {9)
months of settlement date.
ll.F.5. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO
CHAPTER 7.2 OF THE CODE OF TEE COUNTY RELATING TO
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board set
the date of January 27, 1988, at 9:00 a.m., for a public
hearing to consider amendments to Chapter 7.2 of the Code of
the County, relating to Erosion and Sediment Control.
Vote: Unanimous
i1.F.6. SCOPE OF WOP~ FOR AMENDMENT OF THE NORTHERN APdA PLAN
On motion of Mrs. Gir0ne~ seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Hoard
directed the County Administrator to recommend a work program
to amend the Plan for Northern Chesterfield {Northern Area Lank
U~e and Transportation Plan) for consideration on December 9,
1987, which amendment should address the need for ongoing
development in and aronnd Midlothian and should address
concerns regarding the quality of life in the area; and
further, the Board directed the Planning Staff to study the
exteneion of the Corridor Overlay District along Route 60,
between Courthouse Road and the Southern Railroad overpass and
prepare a recommendation for action by the Board.
Vote: Unanimous
87-883
ll.G. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ITEMS
ll.G.i. PUBLIC HEARINGS
ll.G.i.a. TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE TO VACATE A PORTION O~ 10 POeT
DRAINAGE EASEMENT WITHIN WILDWOOD SUBDZVZSION
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance to vacate a portion of
a 10' drainage easement across Lot 10, Block A, within Wildwood
Subdivision.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against ~he
proposed ordinance.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, ~he Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE to vacate a portion of a 10 foot
drainage easement within Lot 10, Block A, Wildwood
Subdivision, Bermuda Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown on a plat
thereof duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court oi Chesterfield County in Plat Book 9,
at page 96.
WHEREAS, Dick MoElfish, with the Engineering Department of
Chesterfield County petitioned the Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County, Virginia, to vacate an portion of an 10
foot drainage easement, within Let 10, Block A, Wildwood
Subdivision, Bermuda Magisterial District, Chesterfield County,
Virginia, more particularly shown on a plat of rscord in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of said County, in Plat
Book 9, page 96, made by H. L. Butte~orth Certified Land
Surveyors dated September 20, 1955. The easement petitioned to
be vacated is more fully described as follows:
A portion of an 10 foot drainage within Lot 10, Block
A, Wildwood Subdivision, the location of which is
more fully shown cross hatched on a plat made by the
Engineering Department, Chesterfield County,
virginia, dated September 8, 1987, a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance.
WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section
15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by
advertising; and
WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the continuance of
the portion of the 10 foot easement sought to he vacated.
NOW THEREFORE, HE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD 0P SUPERVISORS
OP CEEST~R~IE~D COUNTY~ VIRGINIA:
That pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid portion of the 10
foot drainage easement be and is hereby vacated.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
accordance with Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance,
together with the plat attached hereto, shall be recorded no
sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, pursuant to
Section 15.1-48~ of the Code of Vir9%~, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this Ordinance, pursuant to Section
15.1-483, i~ to destroy the force and e~feot of the recording
of the portion of the plat vacated. This Ordinance shall vest
fee simple title of the portion of the easement vacated in the
property owner of the lot within Wildwood Subdivision free and
elea~ o£ any rights of public use.
87-884
Accordingly, thie Ordinance shall be indexed in the names
of the Counby of Chesterfield, as grantor, and Robert ~. Tucker
Sr. and Charlotte Tucker, er their successors in title, as
grantee.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.G.l.b. TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE TO VACATE HILLINGTO~ STP~EBT
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance to vacate Hillington
Street within Buckingham Section One.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the
proposed ordiance.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
adopted the following resolution;
AN ORDInAnCE to vacate Hillington Street within
Buckingham Subdivision, Section One, Midlothian
Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia,
as ehown on a plat thereof duly recorded in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield
County in Plat Book 33, page 33.
WHEREAS, Buckingham Associates petitioned the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia to vacate
sillington Street within Buckingham Subdivision, Section One,
Midlothian Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia
more particularly shown on a plat of record in the Clerk's
Office of the Circuit Court of said County in Plat Book 33,
page 33, made by Charles L. Winqate, Professional Land
Surveyort dated November 30, 1978. The right of way line
petitioned to be vacated is more fully described as follows:
Billington Street within Suckingham Subdivision,
Section One, more particularly ~hown On a plat by
Charles L. Wingate, Professional Land Surveyor, dated
November 30, 1978, and recorded March 1, 1979, in the
Clerk's Offic%, Circuit Court, Chesterfield County,
Virginia, in Plat Book 33, page 33.
WHEBEAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section
15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by
advertising; and
W~BREAS, no public necessity exists for the continuance of
right of way sought, to be vacated.
NOW THEI~EFOI~E, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTYv VIRGINIA=
That pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid right of way be and
is hereby vacated.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
accordance with Section 15.1-452(b) of the Code of Virginia,
1950, ae amended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance ~hall
be recorded no sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk'~
Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield, Virginia pursnant
to Section 15.1-485 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1483
is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of the
portion of the plat vacated. This Ordinance shall vest fee
simple title in the portion of the right of way vacated in the
owners of the abutting lot free and clear of any rights of
public use. Since the portion of the right of way hereby
87-885
vacated is located on the periphery of the aforementioned
recorded subdivision plat, this Ordinance shall vest fee simple
title in the entire width of the portion of the right of way in
the owners of the lot within Buckingham Subdivision, Section
One, free and clear of any rights of public use.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the names
of the County of Chesterfield, as grantor, and Jan A. Moser and
Trudy 2. Moser, or their successors in title, as qrantee.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.G.2. CONSENT ITEMS
ll.G.2.a. ACCEPTANCE OF DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG U. S. ROUTE 60
FROM GADWELL INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
necessary documents accepting, on behalf of the County, the
conveyance of a 14' strip of land along U.S. Route 60 from
Gadwall Investment Properties, Inc., a Virginia Corporation.
IA copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
APPROVAL OF VEPCO EASEMENT AT ROCKWOOD PARK
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the Chairman of the Board and the
County Administrator to execute a variable width easement with
V~pco for relocating the existing facilities in conjunction
with Route 360 road improvements, the entrance to Rockwood
Park. (A copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this
Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
ll.G.2.c. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR WATER LINE WITHIN 0TTERDALE
SUBDIVISION~ SECTION B
On motion of Mr. Appleqate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Eoard
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
necessary documents awarding contract number W87-84C
construction of the water line within 0tterdale Subdivision
Section B, to the low bidder, 0. D. Duncanson, 3r. and Son
Construction, Inc., in the amount of $47,7t0.50; and trans-
ferred funds i~ the amount of $9,500 from 5~-5835-700R
(Contingency Fund -1987-1988 CID) to 5H-5835-600R (gxtensions
Fund} for this project. (It is noted this project will be
funded by the 1987-1988 Capital Improvements ~udget. The amount
previously appropriated was $50,000 and the additional
appropriation in the amount of $9,800 provides for 10%
Contingency.)
Vote: Unanimous
ll.G.2.d. APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 1, FALLING Ct{EEK
PUMPINg STATION
On motion of Mz. Applcgate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary
documents approving Change Order Number 1 in the amount of
$29,497 for the Falling Creek Pumpinq Station to provide a new
stone driveway, drainage ditch improvements and other
restoration work for Mrs. Robinson's property and for the
placing of roof drains from the pumping station under the
87-886
driveway to take drainage away from the buildinq, and to also
prevent a winter ice problem at the access to the pumping
station. (~t is noted funds are available from the contract
contingency for this project.)
Vote: Unanimous
ll.G.2.e. APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NUMBERS 3 AND 4, PROCTORS
CP~EEK WASTEWATER ~R~ATM~NT PLANT EXPANSION
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary
documents approving Change Order Number 3 in the amount of
$80,770.00, for work which includes pipinq, building and
electrical modifications, additional level controls, upqrade of
electrical items t~ explosion proof and replacing the existing
roof of the control building; and Change Order Number 4 in the
amount of $42,800.00 for the Proctors Creek Treatment Plant
expansion project, for work which includes access platforms;
pipinq changes for sludge, non-potable water and floor drains;
and rearrangement of existing air ducts and press room lights
to provide the necessary headroom for the new belt filter
presses. (It is noted Fru-Con Construction Co~poration of
Ballwin, Missouri is the County's contractor on the $12,175,000
treatment plant expansion. Sufficient funds are available from
the Construction Contingency for these change orders.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.G.2.f. AGREEMENT WITH VICTORIAN SQUARE PARTNERSHIP, LTD.
FOR VACATION AND REDEDICATION OF SEWER AND WATER
EASEMENTS
On motion of Mr. Applegate, Seconded by Mr. ~odd, the Board
approved and authorized the Chairman of the Board and the
County Administrator to execute an agreement with victorian
Square Partnership, LTD., to vacate and rededicate existing
sewer and water easements across the property of Victorian
Square Partnership, LTD., in the proper location.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.G.3. REPORTS
Mr. Sale presented the Board with a report on the developer
water and s~wer contracts executed by the County Administrator.
ll.H. REPORTS
Mr. Ramsey presented the Board with a status report on the
General Fund Contingency Account, General Fund Balance, Road
Reserve Funds, District Read and Street Light Funds, Lease
Purchases and School Literary Loans.
Mr. Ramsey stated the Virginia Department cf TranSportation has
formally notified the County of the acceptance of the following
roads into the State Secondary System:
ADDITIONS LENGTH
AUTUMN OARS ~ SECTION D
Route 2811 (Turkey Oak Road) - From 0.06 mile
west of Route 2812 to 0.06 mile west of Route 3549 0.21 Mi.
Route 3549 (Cherrybark Road) - From Route 2811
to Route 2814 0.17 Mi.
87-887
ADDITIONS (continued)
CRADDOCK POINT - SECTIONS 3 & 4
Route 1567 (Evelyn Drive) - From 0.04 mile north
of Route I566 to Route 3570
Route 3570 (Sand Bills Drive) - From 0.15 mile
west of Route 3572 to a west cul-de-sac
Route 3572 (Pine Meadows Circle) - From 0.20 mile
west of Route 3570-East to Route 3570-West
LENGTH
0.12 Mi.
0.38 Mi.
0.06 Mi.
SOMMERVILLE BUSINESS PA~K
Route 970 (North Otterdale Road) - From Route 60
to 0.13 mile north of Route 60
Route 971 (Wylderose Drive) - Prom Route 60 to
0.13 mile north of Route 60
0.13 Mi.
0.13 Mi.
KINGS FOI~EST - SECTION 9
Route 2805 (Doriu~ D~ive) - From 0.17 mile east
of Route 2807 to Route 3800
Route 3800 (Manuel Street) - Prom Route 2828 to
0.02 mile ~outh e~ Route 2805
Route 3803 (Manuel Court) - Prom Route 3800 to
a west cul-de-sac
0.16 Mi.
0.22 Mi.
0.19 Mi.
i1.L. EXECUTIVE SESSION
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board went
into ~xecut~ve Session for consultation with counsel and ~taff
regarding Legal Matters, and the Protection of the Privacy of
Individuals in Relation to a Suspected Nomocide, pursuant to
Sections 2.1-344 (a) (6) and (3), respectively, of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.I. LUNCH
The Board recessed at 11:15 a.m. to travel to the Half-Way
House Restaurant for a luncheon meeting at which representa-
tives of the Richmond Convention and Visitors Bureau would be
present.
Reconvening:
MOBILE HOME REQUEST
87S175
In Matoaca Magisterial District, OPNA W. P~D~N requested a
Mobile ~ome Permit to park a mobile home on property fronting
the south line of Tipton Street at its eastern terminus, and
better known as 2825A Tipton Street. Tax Map 149-14 (12)
Milhorn, Block C, Lot 8 (Sheet 41).
87-888
Mr. Jacobsen Stated staff recommended approval of this request,
subject to ~tandard Conditions.
Mr. Peden stated the recommended conditions were acceptable.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, approved Case
87S175 for seven (7) years, subject to the following standard
conditions:
1. The applicant shall be the owner and occupant of the
mobile home.
2. No lot or parcel may be rented or leased for use as a
mobile home site, nor shall any mobile home be used for
rental property. Only one (1) mobile home shall be
permitted to be parked on an individual lot or parcel.
3. The minimum lot si~e, yard sstbaoks, required front yard,
and other zoninq requirements cf the applicable 2cuing
district shall be complied with, except that no mobile
home shall be located closer than 20 feet to any existing
residence.
4. No additional permanent-type living space may be added
onto a mobile home. Ail mobile homes shall be skirted but
shall not be placed on a permanent foundation.
5. Where public (County) water and/or sewer are available,
they shall be u~ed.
6. Upon being granted a Mobile Home Permit, the applicant
shall then obtain the necessary permits from the Office of
the Building Official. This shall be done prior to the
installation or relocation of the mobile home.
Any violation of the above conditions shall be grounds for
revocation of the Mobile Home Permit.
Vote:
ll.K. REZONING REQUESTS
87S079
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, COUNTRY FAP. MS CONVENIENCE
MARTS ASSOCIATES requested rezoning from Residential (R-7) to
office Business (O) and Convenience Business {B~i) with
Conditional Use Planned Development. A retail/office complex
is planned. This request lies on a 4.5 acre parcel fronting
approximately 266 feet on the north line of Hull Street Road,
also ~:ontlng approximately 700 feet on Pocoshock Soulevard,
and located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of
these roads. Tax Map 40-5 (1) Parcel 14 (Sheet 15).
Mr. Jacobsen stated Mr. Appleqate, Clover Hill District
Supervisor, requested a deferral of Case 87s079 to the December
9, 1987 meeting, provided appropriate advertising requirements
could be met. Mr. Jacobsen stated the advertisinq requirements
could be accommodated.
Mr. John G. Dicks, III, representing the applicants, indicated
the deferral was acceptable.
There was no opposition present to the deferral.
On motion oi Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
deferred consideration of Case 87S079 until December 9, 1987.
87-889
87HP006
C~$T~R PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. Located in Bermuda ~agi~terial
District on property fronting the north llne cf West Bundred
Road at Osborne Road, and better known as 3424 West ~undred
Road. Tax Map 115-4 (3) Chester Heights, Lots 40 through 48
and Lot 4lA (Sheet 32).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission and the
Preservation Committee recommend approval of Landmark
Designation for the Chapel Building only at the Chester
Presbyterian Church, based on the following findings:
1. This is a distinguished building of high architectural
quality and historic interest; and
2. This designation will cause no significant adverse effect
on the future development of the County.
There was ne one present to address the matter.
On motion of the Bomrd, the Board approved historic landmark
designation for the Chester Presbyterian Church Chapel
Building only -- described as follows:
Chester Presbyterian Church - Chapel Building only - 3424 West
Hundred Road, Tax Map 115-4 (3), Chester ~eiqhts, Lots 40
through 48 and Lot 4lA (Sheet 32).
87BP012
HALLSBOROUGH TAVERN. Located in Midlothian Magisterial
Histrict on property fronting the north line of Midlothian
Turnpike at Huguenot Spring Road, and better known es 16300
Midlothian Turnpike. Tax Map 14 (11 Parcel 41 (Sheet 6).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission and the
Preservation Committee recommend approval of Landmark
Designation for Hallsboreugh Tavern, based on the following
findings:
1. This is a distinguished building of high architectural
quality and historic interest; and
2. This designation will cause no significant adverse effect
on the future development of the County.
There was no one present to address the matter.
On motion of the Board, the Board approved historic landmark
designation for Ballsborough Tavern -- described as follows:
Hallsborough Tavern - 16300 Midlothian Turnpike. The southeast
corner of Parcel 41 on Tax Map Section 14 (1) (Sheet 6),
bordered on the west by a line 50' from the structure parallel
to Huguenot Springs Road and on the north by a line 100' from
the structure parallel to Midlothian Turnpike.
Vote: Unanimous
Mrs. Girone requested a letter of appreciation be drafted to
the o~ners for their concurrence with the action of designating
this site as an historic landmark.
87-890
87HP0t3
TRAEBUE'$ TAVERN. Located in Midlothian Magisterial District
on property fronting the north llne of Old Buckingham Road,
approximately 250 feet west of Warminster Drive, end better
known as 11940 Old Buckingham Road. Tax Map 16-7 (1) Parcel 2
(Sheet 7).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Conuniseion and the
Preservation Committee recommend approval of Landmark
Designation for TraebueTs Tavern, based on the following
findings:
1. This is a distinguished building of high architectural
quality and historic interest; and
2. This designation will cause no significant adverse effect
on the future development of %he County.
There was no one present to address the matter.
On motion of the Board, the Board approved historic landmark
designation for Traebue's Tavern -- described as follows=
Traebue's Tavern - 11940 01d Buckingham Road. Tax Map 16-7 (1)
Parcel 2 (Sheet 71.
Vote: Unanimous
875052
In Midlothian Magisterial District, MICHAEL T. BARR requested
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Office Business (O) with
Conditional Use Planned Development en a 10 acre parcel
fronting approximately 500 feet on the south line of Midlothian
Turnpike, across from Old Buckingham Road. Tax Map 16-9 (1)
Parcel 13 (Sheet 7).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of Case 87S052, subject to certain conditions. He
pre~ented a brief overview explaining the proposed development
plan. He stated the applicant submitted a letter on November
16, 1987, proffering that the rear five {5) acres will not be
developed for a minimum of three (3) years; deleting the
request for a day care center on the rear five (5) acres;
agreeing to offer the "Railey Hill" structure to the Garner
family for a park, incorporate the structure into the
development or move the structure to a suitable site. He noted
that conditions, as recommended by the Planning Commission,
would permit a day care center on the northern five (5) acres
but would preclude any selling of gasoline on the northern five
(5) acres.
Mr. Jim Hayes, representing the applicant, stated the
recommended conditions were acceptable, except for Condition 13
and requested the condition be modified to permit the selling
of gasoline on the northern five acre parcel because precluding
such sales would adversely impact the convenience mart's
business.
Mr. Robert Andress, co-chairman of the Community Awareness
Committee for Walton Park Community A~sociation, expressed
appreciation, on behalf of the association, for Mrs. Girone's
participation on this project and applauded the Board's actions
in directing the Planning staff to initiate procedures for the
development of a Community Plan £er Midlothlan Village as it
has long been overdue. He submitted petitions to th~ Board
indicating the citizens of Chesterfield are very concerned in
regards to the haphazard and rapid land development within the
County and support the establishment of a Community Plan for
the Midlothfan area and further request that all rezoning cases
87-891
in this portion of the County be deferred until such time as
the boundaries for the Community Plan can be satisfactorily
defined by the Planning staff, with input from the citizens of
that area. He stated the citizens feel the medium density
residential uses designated for the r~quest parcel are
appropriate, including the limited office development but are
opposed to the convenience mart with gasoline sales.
Ms. Barbara Rowe requested clarification relative to the
discussion regarding the use of gasoline pumps at this site.
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recommended no
gasoline pumps be permitted on the property; however, the
applicant has requested permission to install gasoline pumps on
the northern five (5) acres. MS. Rowe stated area residents
were not aware that gas pumps were a consideration in this
matter, and they would not like to have them in the area. She
stated there are several convenience businesses located along
Midlothian Turnpike within close proximity of their
neighborhood and additional ones do not seem necessary.
Discussion and questions ensued regarding the proposed uses,
requested use exceptions, the transition between the Route 60
corridor and existing residential development south of the
request property, desities and its impact on the adjacent
residential communities, design standards, protection and
maintenance of the historic end architectural integrity e£ the
"Railey Hill" structure located on the request site or the
relocation of the structure to a suitable location approved by
the Chesterfield County Preservation Committee~ permitting or
precluding gasoline sales in conjunction with the convenience
stores use, the volume of traffic which might be generated by
this development, points of access, acceleration/deceleration
lanes and turning movements to Route 60 and Walton Park Road,
crossover alignment with the preposed westernmost access for
the subject property on Route 60, hours of operation, etc.
Mrs. Girone indicated the Board has already instructed staff to
recommend a work program to amend the Plan for northern
Chesterfield to address the need for ongoing development and
concerns for the quality of life in the Midlothian area, with
exact geographic boundaries to be determined through the public
meeting process, she expressed concern that amending the Plan
may be conveying to some people that the Board can prezone land
through this amendment process, and she wished to clarify that
any Plan i~ just a guide and subject to change. She briefly
addressed each recor~nended condition, with particular emphasis
on modifications to conditions 7, 8, 10, 13 and 21, with the
inclusion of Mr. Mike Barr's letter in the record concerning
the disposition o£ ~'Railey Hill". (A c~py of said letter is
filed with the papers of this Board.)
Mr. Dodd stated he would support approval of the request as he
felt it represents a reasonable transititon between the Route
60 corridor and the existing residential neighborhood.
Mr. Mayes stated he felt the governing body should not attempt
to be involved in the the free enterprise aspect cf this
request with respect to the use/non-use of gasoline pumps.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
approved Case $75052, subject to the following conditions:
1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by J.K. Timmons and Associates, P.C., received by
the Planning Department on August 13, 1987, shall b~
considered the Master Plan. (P)
2. Public water and sewer shall be used.
3. The developer shall provide an accurate account of
drainage situation, showing existing drainage and the
impact this project will have on the surrounding area.
87-892
The developer shall submit a construction plan to Environ~
mental Engineering providing for on- and off-site drainage
facilities. This plan shall be approved by the Environ-
mental Engineering Department and alt necessary easements
shall be obtained prior to any vegetative disturbance.
The approved off-site plan may have to be implemented
prior to clearing. (EE)
4. Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed around the
perimeter of all driveways and parking areas. Drainage
shall be designed so as not to interfere with pedestrian
traffic.
5. Access to Route 60 shall be limited to two (2) en-
trance/exits. One (1) access shall he located towards the
eastern property line and the other located towards the
western property line. Both entrance/exits shall be
designed and constructed to allow shared access with
adjacent properties in the future. (T)
6. Additional pavement, curb, and gutter shall be constructed
along Route 60 for the entire property frontage. (T)
7. Prior to issuance of a building permit, thirty (30) feet
of right of way, measured from the centerline of Walton
Park Road, shall he dedicated to and for the County of
Chesterfield, free and unrestricted, unless the Northern
Area Land Use and Transportation Plan Amendment calls for
the relocation of Walton Park Road to the point that this
dedication is not required as determined by the County
Transportation Department. (T&BS)
$. There shall be a sinqle entrance/exit onto Walton Park
Road or a new north/south arterial road. (T&BS)
9. An east/west drive shall be provided through this develop-
ment to allow future access from this development to
adjacent property. Access easements shall be recorded.
10. Additional pavement and curb and gutter shall be con-
structed along Walton Park Road or a new north/south
arterial road to provide left- and right-turn lanes.
]1. Buildings within the southernmost 5.0 acre tract shall
have an architectural style, scale, and appearance as de-
picted in the rendering submitted to the Planning Depart-
ment on August 13, 1987. Ail other buildings shall have
an architectural style similar to that exemplified by
Sycamore ~quare. In the event that the "Railey Mill"
structure is moved to another location, the buildings
within the southernmost 5.0 acre tract may also have an
architectural styl~ similar to that exemplified by
Sycamore Square. (P)
12. Parking areas shall be designed such that their visual
exposure to Walton Park Road is minimized. Specifically,
the amount of parking located between Walton Park Road and
the proposed buildings shall be minimized. This condition
may be modified at the tame of schematic plan review,
provided plane are eubmitted which prove the ~pirit and
intent of the condition will be met by topographical
conditions, terms and/or landscaping. (P)
(Note: This will necessitate that the freestanding build-
ings be moved to the edge of the building setback along
Walton Park Road and that the longest side of structures
be generally parallel to the public reade. Parking ~hould
be located to the side and rear of structures.)
87~893
13. Uses permitted on the northern 5.0 acres shall be re-
stricted to those uses permitted in the Convenience Busi-
ness (B-I) District.
Further, eses occupying structures nearest the eastern
property line shall be limited to Office Business (O)
uses, a day care center, and banking facilities. The
hours of operation for any convenience store shall be
restricted to between 6:00 a.m. and 12:00 midnight. (BS)
14. The southern five (5) acres shall not be developed for a
minimum of three (3) years from the date of approval of
this application. Uses permitted on the southern 5.0
acres shall be restricted to those uses permitted in the
Office Business (O) District.
15. Parking areas shall have at least five (5) square feet of
interior landscaping per parking space. Each landscaped
area shall contain a minimum of fifty (50) square feet and
shall be at least five (5) ieet wide. At least one tree,
having a clear trunk of at least five (5) feet, shall be
provided for each 200 square feet of interior landscaped
area. The remaining area shall be landscaped so as to
divide and break up the expanse of paving. The area
designated as required setbacks or buffers shall not be
calculated as required landscaped area. A conceptual
landscaping plan depicting this requirement shall be
submitted for approval in conjunction with schematic plan
review. Within ninety (90) days of rough clearing and
grading, a detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted to
the Planning Department for approval.
16. Within the fifty (50) foot setback along Midlothian Turn-
pike, ornamental trees and shrubs shall be planted. This
landscaping shall not be within any sewer or water ease-
ments. A conceptual landscaping plan depicting this
requirement shall be submitted for approval in conjunction
with schematic plan review. Within ninety (90) days of
rough clearing and grading, a detailed landscaping plan
shall be submitted to the Planning Department for ap-
proval. (P)
17. A minimum forty (40) foot buffer shall be maintained along
the southern property line. This buffer shall be land-
scaped and bermed to minimize the view of the development
from the adjacent property to the south. Conceptual
landscaping plans shall be submitted for approval in
conjunction with schematic plan review for any site within
the southern 5.0 acres. Detailed landscaping plans shall
be submitted to the Planning Depar~ent for approval
within ninety (90) days of rough clearing and grading.
(P)
18. Exterior lighting shall blend with the architectural style
of the development and be positioned so that the direct or
reflected illumination does not exceed 0.5 foot candles
abova background measured at the lot lines of adjoining
properties or public rights of way. In conjunction with
site plan review, a lighting plan shall be submitted to
the Planning Department for approval. (P)
19. Except for ATM banking machines, hours of operation shall
be limited to between 6:00 a.m. and 12:00 midnight. (P)
20. In conjunction with each schematic plan submission, a
report shall be submitted which certifies that there is no
existing underground mine shaft, pit or cavern which would
cause any detriment or danger to the development. (SS)
21. The "Railey Hill" structure shall either be maintained on
the site and new development designed to enhance the
historic/architectural significance of this structure or
87-894
the "Railey Will" structure shall be moved to another
location which shall be approved by the Chesterfield
County Preservation Committee. {P&DS)
Vote: Unanimous
It was generally agreed the Board would recess for fiv~ (5)
minutes.
87S076
In Midlothisn Magisterial District, JAMES RIVER BUILDERS, INC.
requested rezonlng from Agricultural (A) to Residen-
tial-Townhouse (R-TH) with Conditional Use Planned Development.
A residential-townhouse development is planned. This request
lies on a 24.5 acre parcel fronting approximately 722 feet on
the east line of Coalfield Road across from North Carriage
Lane. Tax Map 15-16 (1) Parcels 3, 10, ll, and 12 (Sheet 7).
Mr. Jaoobson stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to certain conditions.
Mr. William Axselle, representing the applicants, prezented a
brief sun,aery of the proposed request, addressing concerns
relative to density, buffers, lighting standards and heights,
notification to the neighborhood of site plan approval, etc.,
and stated the reconuuended conditions were acceptable. Se
stated, in addition, the applicant agrees not to develop more
than 120 townhouse units of the permitted 164 units until such
times as the project connects to a north/south road east of
this site which intersects with Midlothian Turnpike.
Discussion and questions ensued regarding the proposed uses,
the transition between the Route 60 corridor and existing
residential development, densities and its impact on the
adjacent residential communities, design standards, quality,
projected selling prices, unit sizes, the volume of traffic
which might be generated by thiz development, pointz of acoesz,
acceleration/deceleration lanes and turning movements, public
facilities service, who would be responsible for ~onstruotion
of the north/south road east of this site which is to intersect
with Route 60, otc.
Mr. Herbert Rudd voiced opposition to the proposed project and
expressed concerns relative to the propozed density and the
adverse impact it would have on adjacent residential
neighborhoods regarding the adequacy of sewer facilities,
traffic volumes, overcrowded schools~ etc.
Mr. Robert Shaw, a resident of Carriage Hill Subdivision,
voiced opposition to the proposed development. He stated area
residents feel the proposed Residential Townhouse (RTE) use in
their neighborhood is incompatible with the existing
environment and is too dense and they feel if the ~equest is
approved Residential ~R-12) zoning would be more appropriate.
Mr. John Grubbs, 14000 South Carriage Lane, expressed concerns
relative to the safety of the citizens, particularly the school
age children, who travel Coalfield Road and the hazards the
increased traffic volumes generated by the proposed project
would create.
Ms. Mary Ann Male, a resident of the Uillage of Midlothian,
expressed concerns reqarding growth in the Midlothian area and
87-895
requested the Board consider the ramifications of slewing down
such growth.
Mr. Axselle stated this ease has been a difficult and sensitive
One; however, the applicants have made every effort to resolve
the concerns of the area residents and they feel this project,
if approved, would be an asset to the corm~unity.
Mr. Mayes stated this case focuses on the failure of the Board
to recommend to the County citizens how future development in
the County should take place and whether new subdivisions and
commercial developments are in appropriate locations. He
stated this case is also focusing on development without
consideration for adequate roads and school~ and the community
is trying to tell this Board it should listen and act
accordingly.
Mr. Daniel stated the Boa~d has used alt the available
mechanisms, permitted by the ~tate legislature, to render
decisions on rezoning requests. ~e stated, by law, the
inadequacy of roads, water, sewer, schools, etc., cannot be
used to render decisions on rezoning requests unless such
decisions impact the health, safety and welfare of the citizens
of the County. Mr. Mayes stated he felt the Board should
instruct the State legislators to teke appropriate action to
remedy this situation.
M~. Applegate stated he felt there was adequate sewer to
facilitate the site, the Powhite Parkway Extension, when
completed, would help relieve daily traffic conqestion
somewhat in this area, and there is an indication of
compromise relative to the number of townhouse units to be
constructed; therefore, he felt the case was fairly well stated
except for the schools situations at J. B. Watklns and
Midlothian Middle Schools.
Mr. Dodd stated he felt the density needs to be adjusted but
otherwise he concurred with Mr. Applegate's comments.
Mrs. Girone stated she felt the subject proposal is the best
thus far submitted for the proposed site and the modifications
proposed will be beneficial to the community and relieve
congestion on Coalfield Road.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved Case 875076, subject to the following conditions:
1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by Edward H. Winks Architecture, dated March 24,
1987, and the Textual Statement submitted with the appli-
cation, shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
2. Public water and sewer shall be used. (U)
3. Interior lot widths shall not be smaller than eighteen
(18) feet. ~P)
4. In conjunction with final subdivision plat review, forty-
five (45) feet of right of way, measured from the
centerline of Coalfield Road, shall be dedicated to the
County of Chesterfield, free and unrestricted. (P&T)
5. Additional pavement shall be constructed along Coalfield
Road to provide left- and riqht-turn lanes. (T&VDOT)
6. Access to Coalfield Road shall be limited to a public road
that aligns South Carriage Lane.
7. A fifty (50) foot building setback line and buffer, exclu-
sive of utility easements, shall be provided adjacent to
Coalfield Road. The area within this buffer shall be
planted and/or left in its natural state if there is
87-896
sufficient vegetation to provide adequate screening.
Prior to recordation of subdivision plat~, the developer
~hall flag this buffer for inspection by the Planning
Department. If sufficient vegetation does not exist,
landscaping plan shall be approved by the Planning Depart~
merit and a bond posted to cover the cost of implementing
the plan, prior to recordation of ~bdivi~ion plats. This
building setback line and buffer shall be noted on final
check and record plats. Th~ Planning Commission may
modify this condition at the time of tentative subdivision
review to allow for access break(s). (P)
8. The plan shall be redesigned to minimize the number of
units, both fronting and basking Coalfield Road, and to
minimize parking areas being located between proposed
structures and Coalfield Road.
The developer shall provide an accurate account of the
drainage situation showing existing drainage and the
impact this development will have on the site and sur-
rounding area. The developer shall submit an overall
storm water management and site construction plan to
Environmental Engineering and VDOT providing for on- and
off-site drainage facilities in accordance with the dis-
cussion section of this report. The plans shall be ap-
proved by Environmental Engineering and VDOT and all
necessary easements shall be obtained prior to any
vegetative disturbance. The approved off-site plan may
have to be implemented prior to clearing. This plan may
provide for a phased implementation cf drainage improve-
ments commensurate With the development phasing. (EE)
10. Concrete curb and gutter shall be utilized adjacent to all
roads, driveways, parking areas, and the frontage along
Coalfield Road. (EE)
11. Unless otherwise approved by the Environmental Engineering
Department, the surface drainage grading plan for the
project shall be such that no lot shall drain across an
adjacent lot. (EE)
12. All easements, as necessary to convey the storm drainage
from upstream off-site properties to the storm water
management facility in the open space, shall be recorded
prior to, or in conjunction with, final subdivision plat
review.
13. There shall be a permanent storm water management facility
in the open space. The design criteria shall be in accor-
dance with the discussion section of this report.
14. Prior to the release of any building permits or
recordation of right of way and/or subdivision plats,
ownership and maintenance of the storm water management
facilities shall be established as the responsibility of
private ~ntities. An indemnification agreement shall be
submitted to the Environmental Engineering D~partment to
save the County harmless of vectors, maintenance, and
replacement responsibilities, etc. Upon completion of
construction of the facility, it shall be certified by a
professional engineer. (EE)
15. A fifty (50) foot building setback line and buffer,
exclusive of utility easements rnnning generally per-
pendicular through the buffer and the road set forth in
Condition 6, shall be provided adjacent to the southern
property line of the property for a distance of 600 feet
east of Coalfield Road. Beyond the termination cf this
buffer, a thirty (30) foot building setback line and
buffer, exclusive of utility easements running g~n~rally
psrpendlcular through the buffer, shall be provided along
the remainder of the southern property line. The ar~a
87-897
16.
17.
18.
Vote:
within these buffers shall be planted and/or left in their
natural state if there is sufficient vegetation to provide
adequate screening. Prior to r~cordation of subdivision
plats, the developer shall flag these buffers for
inspection by the Planning Department. If sufficient
vegetation does not exist, a landscaping plan shall be
approved by the Planning Department and a bond posted to
cover the cost of implementing the plan, prior to
recordation of ~ubdivision plats. These building setback
lines and buffers shall be noted on final check and record
plats. The Planning Commission may modify this condition
at the time of tentative subdivision review to allow
parking within the fifty (50) foot buffer, but in no
in~tance ~hall parking be closer than thirty (30) feet to
the southern property line of the property.
Any parking lot light standards located on the property
within 100 feat of Coalfield Road or located within 100
feet of the southern boundary line of the property £or a
distance of 600 feet from Coalfield Road shall be at a
height required by the Planning Commission at the time of
of tentative subdivision plat approval. Ail such parking
lot light standards within such area described above ~hall
be of low intensity, shall be positioned in such a manner
as to minimize the impact of such lighting on any adjacent
single family residential homes and shall be "absolute
cut-off" type (light source being substantially concealed
from view by the design of the liminaire) or of such other
types as required by the Planning Co~unission at the time
of the approval of the tentative subdivision plat for such
property. (BS)
The applicant for tentative subdivision plat approval on
this property shall notify adjoining and adjacent property
owners of the request for such subdivision plat approval.
A maximum of 164 dwelling units shall be permitted. No
more than 120 dwelling units shall be constructed until
such time as the project connects to a north/south road
east of this site which intersects with Midlothian
Turnpike. (BS)
UnanimOus
87S126 (~ended)
In Matoaca Magisterial District, P~NEY $~RING$ D~VELO~M~NT
CORPORATION requested rezoning from Light Industrial (M-I) and
Agricultural (A~ to Residential (R-9) and General Business
(B-3). A mixed use development, with residential and commer-
cial uses, is planned. This request lies on a 27.5 acre parcel
fronting in two (2) places on the west line of Jefferson Davis
Highway for a total o~ approximately 741 feet, across from
Happy Hill Road. Tax Map 163-7 (1) Parcel 1 and Tax map 163-6
(1) Part ef Parcel 14 (Sheet 49}.
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to certain conditions and
acceptance of the applicant's proffered conditions.
Mr. Tom Cogbill stated the recommended conditions were
acceptable. When asked, he indicated the request conforms to
the Southern Area Land Use and Transportation Plan designated
land use and public water/sewer facilities will be utilized.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved Case 87S126, subject to the following condition:
87-898
A fifty (50) foot building setback and buffer strip,
exclusive of easements, shall be provided between the
Residential (R-9) and General Business (B-3) Districts.
Prior to recordation of subdivision plats, the developer
shall flag the buffer for inspection by the Planning
Department. The area within this buffer shall be planted
and improved in accordance with a landscape plan to be
approved by the Planning Department. A bond shall be
posted tc cover the cost of implementing the plan, prior
to recordation of subdivision plats. Except for two (2)
public road accesses, no access shall be permitted through
this buffer. This building setback and buffer strip shall
be noted on final check and record plats. The Planning
Commission may modify this senditien at the time of tenta-
tive subdivision review. (P&T)
(Note: Thio condition supersedes Proffered Condition 7.
And further, the Board accepted the following proffered
conditions:
1. Minimum total square footage: Rancher 1250 sq. ft.
Cape Cod 1400 sq. ft
Two Story 1450 sq. ft.
2. Foundations shall be of brick exterior or stucco.
3. Ail driveways shall be hardsurfaced with any of the fol-
lowing: asphalt, concrete, brick, stone,
4. Utilities shall be underground.
5. Any exposed exterior wood siding shall be stained or
painted.
6. Exterior colors shall be earthtone, grey or white.
7. In the R-9 Residential District:
Developer will put both public water and sewer to all
home sites.
Identification of R~quest: (P~operty which will be
rezoned from M-1 to B-3)
A. Applicant and Owner of subject property request that
the property be rezened from M-1 to B-3 to allow for
the construction of a 45,000 sq. ft. retail space
(this is the total area including both Parcel A and
B). Ae such, we proffer that the following B-3 uses
be excluded:
1. Auction sales or salvage barns.
2. Outdoor advertising signs. (4/28/76)
3. Contractor's shop and storage yard.
4. Exposition building or center, stadiums, arena
5. Farm implements and machinery sales, service,
rental and repair establishments.
6. Mobile home, modular home, motor home and travel
7. Monument sales.
8. ~ublic garages. (See section ~1-641
9. Public utility service buildings, including
facilities for construction or repair, or for
the servles er storage of utility materials or
equipment.
10. Tire racapping and vulcanizing.
11. Truck terminals.
12. Utility trailer and truck rental.
87-899
Explain fully the propoeed use, type of development,
operational program, etc. and the reason of this request.
A. Applicant/Owner plans to conetruct a 45,000 square
foot shopping center on the property. The property
fronts on Jefferson Davis ~ighway, therefore its
highest and best use should be for a retail shopping
center for which there is a need in the area. The
Applicant/Owner will complete public sewer and water
construction to the property.
State how this request will net be materially detrimental
to adjacent property, the surrounding neighborhood or the
county in general, include, where applicable, information
concerning: use of public utilities; effect of request on
public schools; effect on traffic, to include means of
access to the nearest public road; effect on existing and
future area development; ere.:
A. Applicant/OWner does hereby proffer the following
conditions:
Concealed Source Lighting shall not exceed a
height of thirty {30) feet and shall be posi-
tioned sc as not to project onto adjacent and
adjoining residential properties and public
rights of way in accordance with e detailed
lighting plan which shell be submitted to the
Planning Department for approval with site plan
review. Lighting located on the rear Of build-
ings adjacent to residentially zoned property
shall be positioned so that the lights are
directed to the interior of the property and
developed buildings and not towards the residen-
tially zoned property.
2. The maximum height of any freestanding signs
shall be thirty-five (351 feet and all signs,
freestanding or otherwise, may be illuminated,
but may only be luminous if the signfield is
opaque with translucent letters. Ail other
signs shall comply with B-3 requirements.
3. Setbacks along major arterials. The r~quired
setback for buildings and drives alon~ major
arterials shall be 75', Plan submitted to and
approved by the Planning Department. Developer
will landscape the first 25 feet and plans shall
be submitted to and approved by planning
department.
4. (a) Utility lines underground. All utility
lines such as electric, telephone, CATV or
other similar lines shall be installed
underground. This requirement shall apply
to lines serving individual sites as well
as to utility lines necessary within the
project. Ail junction and access boxes
shall be screened with appropriate land-
scaping. All utility pad fixtures and
meters should be shown on the site plan.
The necessity for utility connections,
meter boxes, etc., should be recognized and
integrated with the architectural elements
of the site plan.
(b) Screen Fence. Six foot high wooden ~oreen
fence will be used so as to minimize the
view from project perimeters adjoining any
A, R, R-TH, or R-MF District.
87-900
(c) Architectural treatment. No building
facade (whether front, side, or rear) will
consist of architectural materials inferior
in quality, appearance, or detail to any
other facade of the ea~e building. The
intent of this requirement is not to pre-
elude the use of different materials on
different building facades (which would be
acceptable if representative of good archi-
tectural design) but rather, to preclude
the use of inferior materials on sides
which face adjoining property and thus,
might adversely impact existing er future
development causing a ~ubztantial depre-
ciation of property values. No portion of
a building constructed of unadorned cinder
block or corrugated and/or sheet metal
shall be visible from any adjoining proper-
ty or public riqht-of-way. Mechanical
equipment, whether ground level or rooftop,
shall be shielded and screened from public
view and designed to be perceived as an
integral part o£ the building.
(d) Driveways and parking areas. Driveways and
parking areas shall be paved with concrete,
bituminous concrete, or other similar
material. Surface treated parking areas
and drives shall be prohibited. Concrete
curb and gutter shall be installed around
the perimeter of all driveways and parking
areas. Drainage shall be designed so ae
not to interfere with pedestrian traffic.
(a) Landscaping plan and planting requirements.
1. A landscaping plan shall be submitted
with site plan approval.
2. Such landscaping plan shall be drawn
to scale, including dimensions and
distances, and clearly delineate all
existing and proposed parking spaces
or other vehicle areas, access aisles,
driveways, and the location, size and
description of all landscaping
materials.
(b) Plant materials specifications.
1. Quality. Ail plant materials shall be
living and in a healthy condition.
Plant materials used in conformance
with the provision of these specifica-
tions shall conform to the standards
of the most recent edition of the
"American Standard Nursery Stock"
published by the kmerican Association
of Nurserymen.
2. Size and type.
(a) Small deciduous trees.
deciduous trees shall be of a
species having an average minimum
mature crown spread of greater
than twelve (12) feet. A minimum
caliper of ut least two and
one-half (2 1/2) inche~ at the
time of planting shall be
required.
87-901
(c)
(d)
(e)
(b) Large deciduous trees. Large
deciduous trees shall be of a
species having an average minimum
mature crown spread of greater
than thirty (30) feet. A minimum
caliper of at least three and
one-half (3 1/2) inches at th~
time of planting shall be
required.
Landscaping design.
Generally, planting required by this
s~ction should be in an irregular line
and spaced at random.
2. Clustering of plant and tree species
shall be required to provide a pleas-
ing composition and mix of vegetation.
3. Decorative walls and fences may be
integrated into any landscaping pro-
gram. The use of such walls or
fences, when having a minimum height
of three (3) feet may reduce the
amount of required plant materials at
the discretion of the Director of
Planning.
Tree preservation.
1. Preeervaticn of existing trees is
encouraged to provide continuity,
improved buffering ability, pleasing
scale and image along the Corridor.
2. Any healthy existing tree may be
included for credit towards the re-
quirements of thi~ ~ection.
Maintenance.
1. The owner, er his agent shall be
responsible for maintenance, repair,
and replacement of all landscaping
materials installed in conjunction
with the development as required in
the landscaping plan (inclusive of new
materials).
2. All plant material shall be tended and
maintained in a healthy growing condi-
tion and free from refuse and debris
at all times. All unhealthy, dying,
or dead plant materials shall be
replaced during the next planting
season (inclusive of new plan%
materials),
3. A landscaping plan depicting the
required buffe~ areas, types of
plants, heights cf plants, and spacing
of plants shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for approval.
4. In the event public transportation is
ever made available in the area of the
proposed development, buses may use
the parking areas of the development
for turnaround purposes.
5. Public water and sewer shall be used.
87-902
Applicant/Owner proffers a maximum of
45,000 gross leasable square feet of
development on both Parcel A and B
combined.
Vote: Unanimous
87S137 (Amended)
In Midlothian Magisterial District, FRICK MOTOR GALLERY,
INCORPORATED reguested Conditional U~e Planned Development to
permit an automobile dealership and exceptions to setback and
sign requirements in a Community Business (B-2) District. This
request lies on a 1.8 acre parcel fronting approximately 617
feet on the north line of Midlothiaa Turnpike, across from
Grove Road. Tax Map 16-12 (1) Paroel~ 2, 3, and 4 (Sheet 7).
Mr. Jaeobson stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to certain conditions.
Mr. Edward Willey, Jr., representing the applicant, stated the
recommended conditions were acceptable.
There was nO Opposition present.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved Case 87S137, subject to the following conditions:
1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by W.L. Wienckowski, Architect, revi~ed October 27,
1997, and the Textual Statement submitted on October 22,
1987, shall be considered the Master Plan.
2. Public water and sewer shall be used. (U}
3. Concrete curb and gutter ~hall be installed around the
northern and western edge of existing pavement and the
perimeter of all new driveways and parking areas. Drain-
age shall be designed so as not to interfere with pedes-
trian traffic.
4. Signs shall be as depicted on the Master Plan and de-
scribed in the Textual Statement. (P)
5. Setback~ for buildings, parking areas, and vehicle display
pads shall be as shown on th~ Master Plan. Within these
setbacks, landscaping shall be installed. Also, the
parkinq area~ ~hall be landscaped so as to divide up the
expanse of pavement. Landscaping shall consist o~ a
mixture of ornamental trees, shrubs, and ground cover. A
detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Plan-
ning Department for approval in conjunction with final
site plan review.
6. Exterior lighting shall not exceed a height of forty (40)
feet. Lighting shall be positioned and installed so that
direct or reflected illumination does not exceed 0.5 foot
candles above background, measured at the lot line of any
adjoining residential or agricultural parcel. Lighting
standards shall be of a directional-type capable of
shielding the light source from direct view from any
adjoining residential or agricultural parcel and public
right of way. (P)
7. There shall be no outside public address system. (P)
Building facades shall employ subdued color~ and be of a
decorative treatment such as spliP block, wood, brick,
etc. Architectural ~enderings shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for approval in conjunction with final
~ite plan review. (P)
87-903
9. PriOr to the issuance of an occupancy permit, additional
pavement shall be provided along the eastern half of this
property, thereby completing the pavement widening across
the entire property frontage of Route 60.
10. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, additional
pavement shall be provided for a left-turn lane at the
crossover at Grove Road for eastbound Route 60 vehicles.
11. In conjunction with the approval of this request, the
Planning Co~issien shall grant schematic plan approval
the Master Plan.
(Note: Prior to any cite improvements, site plans must be
submitted to the Planning Department for approval.)
Unanimous
87S103
In Matoaca ~agisterial District, OTTERDALE PR0~RTI~S
ASSOCIATES requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residen-
tial (R-9), Residential-Multifamily (R-~F), and Light
Industrial (M-i) with Conditional Uae Planned Development. A
mixed use development with residential, commercial, and indus-
trial uses is planned. This request lies on a 296 acre parcel
fronting on the south line ef Bull Street Road in two (2)
places for a total of approximately 3,800 feet, across from
Otterdale Road. Tax Map 74 (1) Parcels 35, 71, and 116 (Sheet
Mr. Apple~ate disclosed to the Beard that his company is a
noteholder on the subject property, declared a potential
conflict of interest pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive
Conflict of Interest Act and excused himself from the meeting.
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of the request, subject to certain conditions,
includinq the addeDdum which modifies Conditions tl and 17,
respectively.
Mr. Max Gardner, representing the applicants, stated the
recommended conditions were acceptable, including the addendum
which modifies Conditions 11 and 17. Be stated the applicant
has agreed to extend the water line to the site, upgrade the
sewer pump station and extend Otterdale Road eouth from
intersection at Route 360 through the entire length of the
subject property to ~erve the land eouth of the proposed site.
Be indicated, since the applicant plans to construct an
internal east/west road through the project and dedicate right
of way along Route 360 in accordance with the County's land use
and transportation plan~ he is requesting to be relieved of a
requirement to construct an additional lane of pavement along
eastbound Route 360.
Mr. Stanley Woodfin expresses concerns relative to a family
cemetery that lies within the subject property and requested
assurancee that there will be adequate buffers to protect the
cemetery and that right of access be maintained within the
proposed development. Ne seated family members have been
interred in this cemetery since the 1800'~, and there are
several hundred other people who kava the right te be buried
there in the future.
Mr. Gardner assured those present there would be no disturbance
of the cemetery and that adequate buffers end access would be
provided.
87-904
MS. Thelma E. Brooks stated several of her family members are
also intsrrsd in the cemetery and requested assurance that it
would be preserved and protected.
Mr. Jim Hancock reminded the Board that his company owns 54% of
the sewer pumping station's capacity. When asked,
stated the applicant has acknowledged they have no right to any
existing sewer capacity at the pump station and intend to
upgrade the pump s~ation and main and extend a gravity main to
the site to facilitate their share of the sewage capacity.
~r. McCracken advised the Board that ~taff recommended the
County not accept Proffersd Condition 7 relieving the developer
from widening Route 360. He stated staff was reviewing a
preliminary traffic study submitted by the developer and was of
the opinion that widening Route 360 would he needed to address
the impact of this development. He stated the Overlay District
ordinance defines the methods whereby the needed road
improvements were determined and similar requirements have been
imposed on other developments in the Overlay Districts. He
stated the parallel read referred to by the developer is part
of the County's transportation plan and should not be viewed as
an alternative to widening Route 360. He stated this
development'm traffic generation necessitates both the widening
of Route 360 and the construction of the internal parallel
road. After further discussion, the Board generally agreed to
accept the proffer.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved Case 87M103, subject to the following conditions:
1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the Textual
Statement submitted by Otterdale ~roperties Associates,
prepared by CMSS Architects, and dated Septe~oer 21, 1987,
shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
2. Public water and sewer shall be used. (u)
3. The developer shall extend the 24 inch water line along
~ull Street Road (Route 360) to the site. (U)
4. Ail of the land zoned M-1 and R-~iF shall drain through
retention ponds or other facilities to allow any impu-
rities or surface pollutants in the water to settle before
reaching Swift Creek Reservoir. (EE)
5. The remainder of the property not mentioned above (single
family residential) should, where possible, drain through
the large retention pond at the rear of the property to
allow any impurities or surface pollutants in the water to
settle before reaching Swift Creek Reservoir.
6. The retention/detention design for each drainage area
which drains across the perimeter of the property shall be
completed in conjunction with either the submission of a
site plan or the recordation of right of way, whichever
comes first. (BE)
7. Concrete curb and gutter shall be placed around all
non-storage paved areas in the area zoned M-l.
8. Concrete curb and gutter shall be required along all
drive~ and parking areas in the area zoned R-MP. (BE)
9. The entire area zoned M-1 shall be subject to the require-
ments of the Corridor Overlay District, Article III.,
Division 11.2: Sections 21-67.11 through 21-67.24 of the
Zoning Ordinance. Further, the sntirs area of the request
~hall be ~ubject to Section 21-67.20 ef said Ordinance.
87-905
Ci, 0
10. Prior to, or in oonjnnction with, the submittal of the
first site plan er tentative plat, a conceptual pedestrian
walkway plan for the entire development shall be submitted
to the Planning Commission for approval. This plan shall
facilitate pedestrian movements throughout the develop-
ment. The plan shall be implemented in conjunction with
development of any lot or parcel which adjoins the pedes-
trian mymtem. Detailed plans for construction of each
phase of the system shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for approval in conjunction with submission of
final site plans or final cheek plats. (~)
I1. There shall be open space between development tracts in
the area zoned Residential (R-9), which shall be at least
thirty (30) feat wide if wooded, or fifty (50) feet wide
if not wooded. (P)
12. In conjunction with, or prier to, submittal of the first
site plan or tentative plat, the location of the following
recreational iacilities shall be identified: ~here shall
be at least one (1) swimming pool for each one thousand
(1000) dwelling units, as well as bicycle paths,
playfietds, tot lets, picnic tables, and other such ame-
nities a~ are provided for a total community. The service
area of each facility shall not exceed a one (1) mile
radius, and the required recreation facilities shall be
built and operational by the time sixty percent (60%) of
the dwelling units in the service area have been occupied.
(P)
I3. Copies of any declarations, covenants, and deed re-
strictions, with amendments thereto, including articles
incorporating a homeowner's association, shall be approved
by the Planning Department and the County Attorney's
Office prior to recordation. (P)
14. The permitted uses, accessory uses, Conditional Uses~
Special Exceptions, and required conditions, etc., for the
area zoned Residential (R-9) shall be those specifically
enumerated in Article VIII: Sections 21-98 through 21-102
of the ~oning Ordinance. (P)
(Note: This condition supersedes Section VI.D. of the
Textual ~tatement.)
15. The permitted uses, accessory uses, Conditional Uses,
Special Exceptions, and required conditions for the area
zoned Residential-Multif~u~ily (R-MPI shall be those spe-
cifically enumerated in Article XXII: Sections 21-196
through 21-200.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. {P)
(~ote: This condition supersedes Section VI.E. of the
· extual Statement.)
16. M-2 uses, including the following, shall not be permitted
in t!~e M-1 Tract:
Building materials, storage, and sales.
Contractors' shops and storage yards (if such
storage yards are not visibl~ fro~ any public
street).
Electrical, machinery equipment, and supplies
manufacturing.
Furniture and fixtures manufacturing.
Ice manufacturing.
Other fabricated metal products manufacturing not
otherwise specifically listed in the
Chesterfield County Zoning Ordinance.
Transportation equipment manufacturing.
Textile mill products - manufacturing.
Tobacco manufacturing.
Truck terminals.
Wholesale greenhouses. (P)
87-906
(Note: This condition supersedes Section IV.C. of
the Textual Statement in part. The requested retail
uses are permitted.)
17. There shall be a 100 foot undisturbed natural buffer along
all sides of Tax Map 74-00 (1) Parcel~ 41, 63, and 64,
until and unless said parcels are rezoned for uses other
than residential or agricultural uses. (CPC)
18. The Residential (R-9) area shall be limited to a total of
549 units. (P)
19. A two (2) lane roadway will be constructed through the
project, parallel to Route 360, between the eastern and
western property lines. (BS)
And further, the Board a~cepted the following proffered
conditions:
1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, 100 feet of
right of way, measured south Crom the exieting centerlinm
of Route 360, along the entire frontage of the property,
shall be dedicated to the County of Chesterfield.
2. To provide for an adequate road network, at the time of
full site development, the developer shall be responsible
for the following road imp=ovements:
A. 0tterdale Road shall be extended south from
Route 360 to the southern boundary of the
property. This roadway will be designed as a
four (4) lane facility, with two (2) lanes
constructed by the developer, and will have no
residential lot frontage.
B. One-half of the cost of signalization at the
intersection of Route 360 and Otterdale Road.
C. 0ne-half of the cost of signalization at the
intersection of Route 360 and the secondary
access point.
D. Right-turn lanes shall be constructed on
eastbound Route 360 at its intersection with
Otterdale Road and at its intersection with the
secondary access point of the project.
E. Left-turn lanes shall be constructed on
westbound Route 360 at its intersection with
Otterdale Road and at its intersection with the
secondary access point of the project.
In conjunction with the first schematic plan submission, a
phasing plan for the required roadway improvements, with
supporting traffic analysie, if requested, ~hall be
submitted to the Transportation Department for approval.
Specific roadway improvements set forth in these proffers
are required by the time of full site development to the
extent that level of service "D" ie exceeded and are to be
constructed in accordance with the phasing plan approved
by the Transportation Department. The developer shall
provide the Transportation Department with additional
traffic studies upon completion of each phase, if
requested. Roadway improvements shall be increased or
decreased by the developer as required by the
Transportation Department if these studies demonstrate
that traffic generation rates and distribution solely from
this development are materially different, as determined
by the Transportation DepartMent, from projections Set
forth in the traffic study prepared by Wilbur Smith &
87-907
Associates, dated October 19, 1987, and updated on October
29, 1987. If satisfactory improvements cannot be
provided, the Planning Commission may reduce the
permissible densities to the extent that a level of
service "D" is achieved, as determined by ths
Transportation Department.
5. Access to Route 360 shall be limited to the two (2)
entrances generally depicted on the Master Plan. This
condition may be modified by the Transpo~tatlen
Department.
6. In addition to submission of road construction plans to
~rDOT and Environmental Engineering, the plans shall also
be submitted to, and approved by, the Transportation
Department.
7. Developer shall net be required to construct a third lane
eastbound or westbound on Route 360, except as specified
in items 2E and 2F above, the requirements of the Corridor
Overlay District notwithstanding.
Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Ayes:
Absent: Mr. Appleqate.
Mr. Applegate returned to the meeting.
87S128
In Midlothian Magisterial District, BUCKINGHAM ASSOCIATES
r~quested amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development
(Case 83S142) to delete a chain-link fence and modify lighting
requirements. This request lies in a Residential
District on a 49.5 acre parcel fronting approximately 1,120
feet on the east line of Mount Pisgah Road, across from Oak
Lane, also fronting approximately 678 £eet on the northwest
llne of Old Buckingham Road, approximately 140 feet southwest
of Oldbury Road. Tax Map 16-9 (1) Parcel 44 and Part of
Parcels 11, 12, and 43 (Sheet 7).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Co--lesion recommended
approval of this request, subject to a single condition.
Mr. Patrick Tracy, representing the applicants, stated this
request is to emend a Conditional Use Planned Development (Case
83S142) to delete requirements to install a chain-link fence
within the eastern, northern and western buffers and modify
lighting requirements to allow installation of globe fixtures,
as opposed to concealed source fixtures. He stated the
recommended condition is acceptable.
Mr. David Branch, an area resident, indicated he did not wish
the fence along Mt. Pisgafa Drive removed as it serves as a
barrier between hie property and the proposed development and
prevents trespassing from individuals on both sides of the
property. He also expressed concerns regarding increased
traffic volumes on Mt. Pisgah Drive as well as construction
traffic utilizing driveways onto Mt. Pisgah Drive. Mr. Tracy
stated he would immediately take the necessary steps to
eliminate the construction access situation and assured those
concerned the situation would not continue.
After a brief discussion, it was generally agreed that the six
(6) foot chain link fencm should bm installed in the buffer
along Mount Pisgah Drive and all other chain link fences,
required by Zoning request 83S142, should be deleted.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd~ resolved to
approve Case 87S128, subject to the following conditions:
1. Lighting shall be arranged and installed so that the
direct or reflected illumination does not exceed 0.5 foot
87-908
candles above background measured at the lot line of any
adjoining residential or agricultural parcel. (P)
(Mote: This condition supersedes Condition 4 (d) of Case
~3S142.)
2. A six (6) foot chain link fence shall be installed in the
buffer along Mount Piegah Drive. Ail other chain link
fences, required by Zoning request 83S142, shall he
deleted. (BS)
Vote: Unanimous
87S129
In Midlothian Magisterial District, THOMAS G. CAUBLE requested
amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development (Cage 80S157)
relative to signs. This request lies in a Community Business
(B-2) District on a 3.6 sore parcel fronting approximately 300
feet On the south line of Midlothian Turnpike, across from
Mount Piegah Drive. Tax Map 16-9 (1) Parcel 30 (Sheet 7).
Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this request, as per staff's recommendation,
subject to a single condition.
Mr. Cauble requested relief from the recommended condition that
all signs shall be regulated by the "U. S. Route 60 Special
Sign District" so that two additional free standing signs may
be permitted.
There was no opposition present.
Mrs. Girone concurred with Mr. Cauble and indicated the
requested signs would be appropriate.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
approved Case 87S129, subject to the following condition:
Condition 4 of Zoning Case 80S157 shell be s/nended to
permit a maximttm of three (3) signs within the buffer
along Midlothian Turnpike. These three (3) signs shall be
installed according to the papers filed with this request.
All other signs requested with Case 87S129 shall be
permitted. (BS)
Vote: Unanimous
87S130
In Midlothian Magisterial District, THE AS~LMONT COMPANY
requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-15).
A single family residential subdivision is planned. This
request lies on a 7.6 acre parcel lying approximately 100 feet
off the western terminus of Berrand Road, approximately 2,000
feet west of Courthouse Road. Tax Map 27-5 (1) Parcel 2 (Sheet
S).
Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to a single condition.
Mr. Delmonte Lewis stated the r~commsnded condition was
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegatet the Board
approved Case 87z130, subject to the following condition:
A fifty (50) foot building setback and buffer strip,
exclusive of easements, shall be established and
maintained along Herrand Road. Prior to recordation of
87-909
subdivision plats, the developer shall flag the buffer for
inspection by the Planning Department. The area within
the buffer shall be planted, or left in its natural state
if there is sufficient vegetation to provide adoquat~
screening. If sufficient vegetation does not exist,
landscape plan shall be submitted to the ~lannlng
Department for approval and a bond ~hall be posted to
cover the cost of implementing the plan, prior to
recordation of subdivision plats. No access shall be
permitted through this buffer. This building setback and
buffer strip shall be noted on final check and record
plats. The Planning Commission may modify thi~ condition
at the time of tentative subdivision review.
Vote: Unanimous
87S131
In Matoaca Magisterial District, LAV~RN~ C. COLE AND
SADLER, JR. requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) and
Residential (R-40) to Office Business (O) and General Business
(B-3). An office/commercial complex is planned. This request
lies on a 25 acre parcel fronting approximately 1,323 feet on
the west line of Iron Bridge Road, also fronting approximately
603 feat On Greenyard Road, and located in the southwest
quadrant of the intersection of these roads. Tax Map 95-12 (1)
Parcels 38 and 39 and Tax Map 96-13 (1) Part o~ Parcel 1 (Sheet
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to the following condition
and acceptance of the applicant's proffered conditions.
Hr. Sadler stated the recommended condition was acceptable.
There was no opposition present.
When asked, Mr. Sadler indicated public water and sewer would
be utilized for the project.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved Case 87S131, subject to the following condition:
A forty (40) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
western property lines. With the exception of driveways
which run generally perpendicular through the buffer,
there shall be no buildings, drives, and parking areas
within this buffer. At the time of site plan review for
each individual site which abuts the buffer, the width of
the buffer may be reduced to twenty-five (25) feet if
landscaping is provided in accordance with the Corridor
Overlay District standards, Perimeter Landscaping C.
Further, the buffer may be reduced to twenty (20) feet if
a public road is not constructed on adjacent property to
the west and the twenty (20) foot area is landscaped in
accordance with Corridor Overlay District standards,
Perimeter Landscaping B.
(Note: Except as noted herein, setbacks for buildings,
parking areas, and driveways must conform to the Corridor
Overlay District standards.)
And further, the Board accepted the following proffered
conditions:
1. Actual uses will be limited to B-1 u~es and the following
B-2 and S-3 uses:
a. Hotel and motel
b. Department stores
87-910
3.
Vote:
c. Drive-in establishment
d. Schools commercial, trade, music, dance,
business, vocational and training.
The limiting height of buildings in the O zoning shall not
exceed three (3) stories.
Uses along Greenyard Road will be limited to those
permitted in the O district and banking institutions.
$7S134
In Matoaca Magisterial District, E.M. ENGLER ASSOCIATES
requested rezoning from Agricultural (A), Residential (R-12),
and Office Business (0) to 0££ice ~usiness (0) and Community
Business (B-2) with Conditional Use Planned Development. A
mixed use development with office, commercial and multi-family
residential uses is planned. This request lies on a 191 acre
parcel fronting approximately 2,150 f~et on the south line of
Dull Street Road approximately 50 feet west of West Village
Green Drive, also fronting in two (2) places on the west line
of Tomahawk Drive for a total of approximately 470 feet. Tax
Map 62-9 (1) Parcels 1, 2, and 3; Tax Map 62-10 (1) Parcels 5,
7, and 8; and Tax Map 62-13 (1) Parcel 7 (Sheet 20).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Conumission reco~ended
approval of this request, subject to certain conditions and
acceptance of the applicant's proffered conditions.
Mr. Kidd, representing the applicant, stated the recommended
conditions were acceptable.
There was no opposition present.
When asked, Mr. Kidd stated public water and sewer would be
utilized. When asked, Mr. McCracken outlined the road
improvements proffered by the applicant as follows: prior to
issuance of a building permit, right of way shall be dedicated
along the full length of the property for the southern one half
of the right of way for U.S. Route 360 to a width of 100 feet,
such area to be measured from the centerline of the existing
right o~ way; to provide for an adequate area road network at
the time of complete development, the developer shall be
responsible for the following road improvements:
A. One additional eastbound lane of U.S. Route 360 shall be
constructed along the frontage of the property, as may be
deemed necessary by the Chesterfield Transportation
Department.
B. Right turn lanes shall be constructed on U.E. Route 360 at
each of the two main project entrances.
C. One additional westbound lane of U.S~ Route 360 shall
be constructed along the frontage Of the property as
may be deemed necessary by the Chesterfield
Transportation Department.
D. Left turn lanes shall be constructed on U.S. Route
360 at each of the two main project entrances as
shown on the Master Plan unles~ access to the
property item U.S. Route 360 is provided by grade
separated entranses. The turn lanes shall be siDgle
or dual as may be deemed necessary by Chesterfield
Transportation Department.
E. Signalization shall be provided at each of the two
U.S. Route 360 entrances shown on the Master Plan at
such time as the intersections are constructed and
87-911
~ignalisation is deemed necessary by Chesterfield
Transportation Department unless the developer elects
to provide access to the property from U.S. Route 360
by grade separated entrances.
F. At such time an entrance is constructed onto U.S.
Route 360, the westbound lane~ of U.S. Route 360
shall be regraded to provide adequate sight distance
unless the developer elects to provide access to the
property from U.S. Route 360 by grade separation
entrances.
And further, in conjunction with the first schematic plan sub-
mission, a phasing plan for required read improvements, with
supporting traffic analysis, if regueated by the Transportation
Departmentt shall be submitted to the Transportation Department
for approval; specific roadway improvements set forth in these
transportation proffers are required by the time of full site
development and are to be constrnlcted in accordance with the
phasing plan approved by the Transportation Department. The
developer shall provide the Transportation Department with
additional traffic studies upon completion of each phase if
requested. Roadway improvements shall be increased or
decreased by the developer as required by the Transportation
Department if these studies demonstrate that traffic generation
rates and distributions solely by this development are
materially different as determined by the Transportation
Department from projections set forth in the traffic study
prepared by WSA and dated July 15, 1987, with supplements dated
August 17th, September 14th, and September 21, 1987; access to
U.S. Route 360 shall be limited to the two (2) entrances as
generally depicted on the Master Plan, This condition may be
modified by the Transportation Department; the Master Plan
suffered with the application shall be considered the Master
Road Plan. Approval of the plan by the County does net imply
that the County gives final approval of any particular road
alignment or section; in addition to submission of road
construction plans to VDOT and Environmental Engineering, the
plans shall also be submitted to and approved by the
Transportation Department; and a seventy (70) foot right-of-way
for a stub road shall be provided somewhere between the
southern property line and the internal road network, upon
request from the Transportation Department. The right-of-way
shall be provided prior to full site development.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
approved Case 87S134, subject tO the following conditions:
1. The followin9 conditions notwithstanding, the plan dated
July 30, 1987, and the Textual Statement submitted with
the application shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
2. The following conditions notwithstanding, except as
provided in such conditions, the entire property, with
exception of tracts developed for Residential-Multifamily
use, shall conform to the Corridor Overlay District stan-
dards in effect as of the date of approval of this Condi-
tional Use Planned Development. The Corridor Overlay
District setback standards shall be applicable only along
public rights of way and perimeter boundaries except where
buffer requirements are greater. All other setbacks shall
be as provided in the Textual Statement. The hulk and
land~caping provi~ion~ contained in the Textual Statement
shall apply except to the extent the Corridor Overlay
District, as applicable to this project~ imposes more re-
strictive requirements. (P)
3. Residential-Multifamily uses shall conform to the bulk
requirements of the Resideatial-Multifamily (R-MF) Dis-
trict except as follows:
87-912
a. Within a project constructed as housing for the
elderly, a total of fifteen (15) dwelling units
may be allowed on any one floor level.
b. The minimum distance between buildings shall
twenty (20) feet plus five (5) feet for each
story abnve two (2) stories.
c. Required recreational facilities may be shared
among two or more multifamily developments
within the project. The Conservation District
and any lake area may be counted as passive
recreatlonal acreage toward fulfilling the total
recreational area requirement.
4. In conjunction with the approval of this request, the
following maximum height limitations shall apply:
a. A 150 foot height limitation for towers within
the tracts designated as GC-1 and GC-3 On thc
Master Plan.
b. A twelve (12) story or 120 foot height limi-
tation for offices and hotels within the tracts
designated GC-1, GC-2r GC-3, and VC-1 on the
Master Plan.
c. A three (3} story or sixty (60) foot height
limitation for other buildings within the tract
designated as GC-1 on the Master Plan.
d. A three (3) story or forty-five (45) foot height
limitation for other buildings withiD the GC-2,
GC-3, and VC-1 tracts.
e. A six (6) story or seventy (70) foot height
limitation for all buildings within the
tract.
f. A six (6) story or seventy (70) foot height
limitation for all buildings within the R/O-l,
R/O-2, and R/O-3 tracts, with thc exception of
office buildings and hotels which shall be
limited to twelve (12) stories or 120 feet.
g. Any structure of seven (7) stories or more that,
at the time of construction, interferes with the
emergency communication system for Chesterfield
County, will be constructed with a communica-
tions relay device which will alleviate such
interference. H.V.A.C. equipment and roof
screens shall not be included in the determina-
tion of height. Heights may be increased by the
Planning Commission at schematic plan review
provided such factors as massing, visibility to
and from the site, exact location of structures,
provision of open space, etc., are illustrated
as part of an overall plan of development and
submission of documentation that indicates that
such increases will not adversely impact upon
existing or anticipated residential uses on
adjacent properties. (P)
5. Except where deemed unnecessary by the Director of Plan-
ning, schematic plans for any parcel shall include infor-
mation as to the uses proposed on the entire tract or
tracts as outlined on the Master Plan of which such parcel
is a part. To the extent the uses of the area surroundinq
such parcel have been determined at the time of schematic
review, at the request of the owner, the Planning commis-
sion may modify the bulk requirements for such parcel as
set forth in the Textual Statement with the exception that
87-913
there shall be no modification to any Corridor Overlay
District standard as applied to this project. Such modi-
fication may be conditioned upon the addition of any
conditions r~quired relative to land use compatibility.
6. Uses permitted within the GC-1, GC-2, and VC-1 tracts
shall include all uses listed in the Textual Statement
except the following:
a. Milk distributing station
Pawn and second-hand stores
c. Boarding kennels
d. Tourist homes.
Further, the following additional uses shall he permitted:
(1) in the GC-2 tract only, when set back a minimUm of 150
feet from Hunter's Chase Apartments (Tax Map 62-t0 (1)
Parcels 18 and 19), and (2) in the GC-1 and VC-1 tracts,
only when set back a minimum of 250 feet from Hunter's
Chase Apartments:
Automobile service stations
b. Funeral hemes or mortuaries
c. Theatres
d. Pet grooming shops
e. Veterinary clinics
f. ~oat sales
Cocktail lounges, dining halls, night clubs
h. Drive-in establishments
i. Motor vehicle sales, service, and repair
Veterinary hospitals
k. Motor vehicle washes.
At the time of schematic plan review, these setbacks may
be reduced if the applicants can provide adequate site
design so as to protect the adjacent residential uses from
excessive noise, light, and similar adverse impacts. (P)
(Note: Asceptable site design elements may include addi-
tional screening or buffering, as well as orientation of
buildings to reduce impact on Hunter's Chase Apartments.
With regard to this condition, the term "use" shall begin
where activity on the site begins, that is the distance
between Hunter's Chase Apartments and the "use" shall be
measured from the property line to the edge of the parking
area, loading area or the building, whichever is closer.}
7. Public water and sewer shall be used. In conjunction with
first schematic plan submission, an overall conceptual
water and sewer system plan ~or the entire property shall
be submitted to the Utilities Department for review and
approval. (U)
8. Disturbance for the purposes of development on slopes
greater than 15% shall be allowed only upon approval by
the Environmental Engineering Department. (EE)
9. Signs shall comply with the Corridor Overlay District
standards, as applied herein, except that the ~ollowing
additional £ree~tanding signs shall be permitted for a
regional shopping mall only:
a, One (1} freestanding sign along U.S. Route 360
at an entrance to the mall, having a maximu/~
area c£ thirty-two (32) square £eet and a maxi-
mum height of thirteen (13) feet.
One (1) freestanding sign along the internal
loop road or the east-went connector road, as
described in the Textual Statement, having a
maximum area of fifty (50) square fe~t and a
maximum height of twenty (20) feet. (P)
87-914
10. Ail structures shall be located a minimum of five (5) feet
outside of and a minimum of one (1) foot above the
inundation limits for dam failure of the Swift Creek
Reservoir. (P&EE)
And further, the Board accepted the following proffered
conditions:
1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, right of way shall
be dedicated along the full length of the property for the
southern one half of the right of way for U.S. Route 360
to a width of 100 feet, such area to be measured from the
centerline of the existing right Of way.
2. To provide for an adequate area road network at the time
of complete development, the developer shall be responsi-
ble for the following road improvements:
A. One additional eastbound lano of U.S. Route 360
shall be constructed along the frontage of the
property, as may be de,ed necessary by the
Chesterfield Transportation Department.
Right turn lanes shall be constructed on U.S.
Route 360 at each of the two main project
entrances.
C. One additional westbound lane of U.S. Route 360
shall he constructed along the frontage of the
property as may be deemed necessary by the
Chesterfield Transportation Department.
D. Left turn lanes shall be constructed on U.S.
Route 360 at each of the two main project en-
trances as shown on the Master Plan unless
access to the property from U.S. ROUte 360 is
provided by grade separated entrances. The turn
lanes shall be single or dual as may be deemed
necessary by Chesterfield Transportation
Department.
E. Signalization shall be provided at each of tho
two U.S. Route 360 entrances shown on the Master
Plan at such time as the intersections are
constructed and signalization is deemed neces-
sary by Chesterfield Transportation Department
unless the developer elects to provide access to
the property from U.S. Route 360 by grade sep-
arated entrances.
F. At such time an entrance is constructed onto
U.S. Route 360, the westbound lanes of
Route 360 shall be regraded to provide adequate
sight distanc~ unless the developer elects to
provide access to the property from U.S. Route
360 by grade separation entrances.
3. In conjunction with the first schematic plan submission, a
phasing plan for required road 5-mprovements, with support-
ing traffic analysis, if requested by the Transportation
Department, shall be submitted to the Transportation
Department for approval.
4. Specific roadway improvements set forth in these transpor-
tation proffers are required by the time of full site
development and are fo be constructed in accordance with
the phasing plan approved by the Transportadion Depart-
ment. The developer shall provide the Transportation
Department with additiouat traffic studies upon completion
of each phase if requested. Roadway improvements shall be
increased or decreased by the developer as required by the
87-915
Transportation Department if these studies d~monstrate
that traffic generation rates and distributions solely by
this development are materially different as determined by
the Transportation Department from projections set forth
in the traffic study prepared by WSA and dated July 15,
1987, with supplements dated August 17th, September 14th,
and ~eptember 21, 1987.
5. Access to U.S. Route 360 shall be limited to the two (2)
entrances as generally depicted on the Master Plan. This
condition may be modified by th~ Transportation
Department.
6. The Master Plan submitted with the application shall be
considered the Ma~ter Road Plan. Approval of the plan by
the County does not imply that the County gives final
approval of any particular road aliqnment or section.
7. In addition to submission of road construction plans to
VDOT and Environmental Enqineerinq, the plans shall also
be submitted to and approved by the Transportation
Department.
8. A seventy (70) foot right-of-way for a stub road shall be
provided ~omewhene between the southern property line and
the internal road network, upon request from the Transpor-
tation Department. The riqht-of-way shall be provided
prior to full site d~velopment.
Vote: Unanimous
87S135
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, E. FRANKLIN DEPEW, ROBERT
O. ~RAUS$=, AND JOHN F. DEPEW requested Conditional Use Planned
Development to permit an indoor/outdoor recreational facility
and bulk exceptions in a Community Business (B-2) District on a
1.8 acre parcel lying approximately 200 feet off the north line
of Hull Street Road, approximately 620 feet west of Courthouse
Road. Tax Map 49-7 (1) Part of Parcel 7 (Sheet 14).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to certain conditions.
Mr. Bill Walton stated the recommended conditions were
acceptable.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved Case ~7S135, subject to the following conditions:
1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan submit-
ted October 1, 1987, shall be considered the Master Plan.
2. Public water and sewer shall be used. (U)
3. A minimum of ~ixty-nine (69) parking space~ shall be
provided. (P)
4. In conjunction with appneval cf this request, the Planninq
Commission shall grant schematic plan approval of the
Master Plan. (P)
(Notes: (a) The entire property lies within the
Corridor Overlay District and must comply with
applicable Zoning 0rdinan¢~ requirements.
(b} Prior to any sit~ improvements, sit8 plans
87-916
must be submitted to the Planning
Department for approval.)
Vote: Unanimous
Due to a previous commitment, Mrs. Girone excused herself from
the meeting.
87S136
In Bermuda Magisterial District, W.J. ROWE, JR. requested
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-9). A slnglc
family residential subdivision is planned. This request lies
on a 14.5 acre parcel fronting approximately 360 feet on the
east line of Chester Road, approximately 2,000 feet north of
Wood Dale Road. Tax Map 97-10 (1) Parcel 5 (Sheet 32).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commiseion recommended
approval of this request, subject to a single condition and
acceptance of proffered conditions.
Mr. Jay Rowe stated the recor~ended condition is aeeeptable and
the proffered conditions will ensure quality development and
proper land use transitions and are similar to those accepted
with the Chester Associates rezoning of the property to the
south, Ascot Pointe (Case 86S119), providinq for lot
equivalent to Residential (K-12) zoning.
There was ne opposi~ien present.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the
approved Case 875136, ~ubject to the following condition:
Board
A fifty (50] fee~ building setback and buffer strip,
exclusive of easements, shall be established and
maintained along Chester Road (Route 144). Prior to
recordation of subdivision plats, the developer shall flag
the buffer for inspection by the Planning Deparf-ment. The
area within this buffer shall be planted, or left in its
natural state if there is sufficient vegetation to provide
adequate screening. If sufficient vegetation does net
exist, a landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for approval and a bond shall be posted to
cover ~hc cost of implementing the plan, prier to
recordation of subdivision plats. No access shall be
permitted through this buffer. This building setback and
buffer strip shall be noted on final check and record
plats. The Planning Co~u~fssion may modify this condition
at t_he time of tentative subdivision review. (P&T)
And further, the Beard accepted the following proffered
conditions:
1. County sewer and water will be used for all development.
2. Minimum square footage for homes as follows:
a. Ranchers - 1,400 square feet finished
b. Cape Cods and Tri-levels - 1,600 square feet finished
c. Two stories - 1,800 square feet finished
3. The following shall be incorporated into the Declaration
of Restrictions and recorded with the subdivision plat:
A. No lot shall be used other than for residential
purposes. Only one residence may be constructed on
each platted lot, as recorded~ nor shall said platted
lots be ~ubdivided or resubdivided.
B. Exclusive of the main dwelling, ne building, struc-
ture, outbuilding, playhouse, f~nce or wall shall be
87-917
erected, placed or altered on any lot until the
construction plans and specifications and a plan
showing the location of the same have been filed with
and approved by the Architectural Control Co~m%ittee
as to square footage, quality of workmanship and
materials, harmony of exterior design and/or color
with exieting structures, and as to location with
respect to topography and finished grade elevation.
C. The Committee's approval or disapproval, a~ required
in these proposed restrictions, shall be in writing.
In the event the committee or its designated
resentative fails to approve or disapprove within 30
days after plans and specifications have been submit-
ted to it or, in any event, if no suit to enjoin the
construction or alteration, after notice in writing
of said construction has been received by said Com-
mittee, approval will not be required and the related
covenants shall be deemed to have been fully complied
with.
D. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public
view on any lot, except that One sign of not more
than seven square feet advertising the property for
sale Or rent may be displayed; two signs used by a
building to advertise the property during con-
struction and sales period may also be displayed;
also, one sign may be displayed at the entrance of
subdivision of not more than twenty-four square feet.
No trailer, tent, shack, garage, barn or other out-
building erected on any lot shall, at any time, be
used as a residence, temporarily or permanently, nor
shall any structure of a temporary character by used
as a residence; provided, however, this clause shall
not be construed to prevent domestic help quarters
being installed over a detached garage or other
outbuilding.
F. No homeowner's trailer shall be parked over 12 hours
in any one week on any lot or driveway so as to be
visible from the street.
G. No live stock, cattle, hogs, or goats, any dog kennel
as defined by the Chesterfield County Code in exis-
tence as of the date of the recordation of these
restrictions shall be allowed on any lot~ nor shall
any noxious or offensive trade or activity be carried
on thereon, nor shall anything be done thereon which
shall be or become an annoyance or nuisance to a good
residential neighborhood.
H. No lots shall be used or maintained as a dumping
ground for rubbish. Trash, garbage, or other waste
~hall be kept in eanitary container~. Ail incinera-
tors or other equipment for the storage or disposal
of such materials shall be kept in a clean and sani-
tary condition in rear yard~ only. Trash to be
picked up by public or privats service shall be kept
out~ide the bound~ of any road in the subdivision and
kept wholly on the individual lots.
I. No horse or pony shall be stabled or pastured on any
lot or parcel of land.
J. No unlicensed motor vehicle shall be parked on any
lot herein for more than 60 days unless it is parked
in an enclosed garage.
NO trees measuring six inches or more in diameter at
a point two feet above ground level may be removed
without the written approval of the Architectural
87-918
Control Committee. Approval for the removal of trees
located within fifteen feet of the main dwelling or
accessory buildings will be granted unless such
removal will substantially increase the beauty of the
property. This shall not apply to clearing of right
cf ways, and/or easements, for construction of road-
ways, drainage and utilities, or for garden or trail-
The following are prohibited until it has been ap-
proved by the Architectural Control Committee:
1. No fence ehatl he erected, placed, or altered on
any lot.
2. No antenna other than a television antenna shall
be installed.
5. No swimming pool shall be constructed above
ground.
4. No single-story main structure shall be of slab
conetr~eti0n.
5. No maeonry other than brick or stone shall be
left exposed on any structure.
M. Restrictive Covenants r~quiring exterior finish
materials to be one of the following:
1. Beaded hardboard sliding
2. Woodsman siding
3. Wood siding
4. Brick veneer
N. Ail utilities are to be underground.
O. These covenants are to run with the lend and shall be
binding on all parties and all persons claiming under
them for a period of twenty (20) years for the date
covenants shall be automatically extended for an
additional period of ten (10) years unless any in-
strument signed by a majority of the then owners of
the lots has been recorded, agreeing to change said
covenants in whole or in part.
4. Curb and gutter shall be used.
5. Maximum number of lots not to exceed 40~
Ail exposed chimneys will be brick.
7. Ail utilities shall be underground.
8. No satellite dishes allowed.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate and Mr. Dedd.
Absent: Mrs. Girone.
875135
In Bermuda Magisterial District, DAVID LOVE requested rezoning
from Connnunity Bueinees (B-2) to General Business (B-3) and
Light Industrial (M-l). A commercial/industrial complex is
planned. This request lies on a 3.4 acre parcel fronting
app~oxlmately 150 feet on the east line of Jefferson Davis
Highway, approximately 1,250 feet north of West Hundred Road.
Tax Map 116-6 (1) Parcels 34 and 80 (Sheet 32).
Mr. Jacobeon crated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to certain conditions.
Mr. Edward Willey, Jr. stated the recommended conditione were
acceptable, subject to his requested amendment.
87-919
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayer, the Board
approved Case 87S138, subject to the following conditions:
1. A fifteen (15) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
northern and eastern boundary of the Liqht Industrial
(M-i) tract. Other than utilities, which run generally
perpendicular through the buffer, landscaping, and a
fence, if desired, located along the south and west bound~
aries of this buffer, there shall be no other facilities
Or other improvements permitted within this buffer. These
buffers shall be landscaped sc as to screen the view cf
uses from the adjacent mobile home park to the north and
east. Should the adjacent property to the north and east
be developed for a commercial or industrial use in the
future, the b~ffers may be deleted. A conceptual land-
scaping plan depicting these requirements shall be submit-
ted to the Planning Department for approval in conjunction
with site plan review. A detailed landscaping plan de-
picting these requirements shall be submitted to the
Planning Department within sixty (60) days of rough clear-
inq and grading. The fifteen (15) foot buffer may be
reduced as much as five (5) feet at the time of site plan
review. (P&BS)
(Note: The required twenty-five (25) foot side yard
building setback and thirty (30) foot rear yard building
setback must be maintained.)
2. The recp~ired parking setback along Jefferson Davis Hiqhway
shall be maintained as a buffer. Other than utilities,
landscaping, signs, and access, there shall be no other
facilities permitted within this buffer. The number,
desiqn, and location of access(es) through ~his buffer
shall be approved by ~ahe Transportation Department at the
time of site plan review. (P&T)
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate and Mr. Dodd.
Absent: Mrs. Girone.
87S139
In Matoaca Magisterial District, THOMAS A. MOODY AND GEORGE H.
COOK requested a Conditional Use to permit offices in an
Agricultural (A) District on a 1.0 acre parcel fronting ap-
proximately 120 feet on the west line of Branders Bridge Road,
across from West Hundred Road. Tax Map 114-16 (1) Parcel 49
(Sheet 31).
Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Cc~mission recommended
approval of this request, subject to certain conditions.
Mr. Moody stated the recommended conditions were acceptable.
When asked, Mr. Jacobson stated the request was in conformance
with the Central Area Land Use and Transportation Plan, and
public water would be used to develop the site. Mr. ~acobson
added public sewer is not required as this site was an old
business location, not a residential use.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved Case 87S139, subject to the following e0nditi0ne:
1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by Austin Brockenbrough and Associates, dated August
18, 1987, shall be considered the plan for the first phase
of development. In conjunction with site plan approval
for the first phase of development, an overall conceptual
development plan shall be submitted tO the Planning De-
87-920
partment for review and approval. This plan shall concep-
tually depict how the remainder of the property will be
devslcped for office uses in the future. (P)
2. All buildings shall have a residential appearance, scale,
architectural style and quality similar to that depicted
in the elevations submitted with the application. (B)
3. Outdoor lighting shall blend with the architectural style
of buildings. (P)
4. A thirty (30) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
southern property line. This buffer shall be landscaped
to provide effective, year-round screening of driveways
and parking areas ~rom the adjacent property to the ~outh.
With the exception of landscaping, berms, fences, and/or
utilities which run generally perpendicular through the
buffer, there shall be no facilities within this buffer.
If buildings are positioned so as to minimize the view of
driveways and parking areas from adjacent property to the
south, the Planning Department may waive some of the
required landscaping in the buffer at the time of site
plan review. A detailed landscaping plan depicting this
requirement shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for approval in conjunction with site plan review for each
phase of development. With the exception of the buildings
depicted On the plan submitted with the application,
office buildings shall be located between the buffer and
future parking areas. (P)
5. Public water shall be used. At such time as public sewer
is extended to within 400 feet of the request parcel, the
owner/developer shall extend sewer to serve the entire
parcel provided the sewer, from which service would be
extended, is deep enough to ssrvlce the parcel. (U)
6. The developer shall provide an accurate account of the
drainage situation, showing existing drainage and the
impact this project will have on the site and the sur-
rounding area. The developer shall submit a construction
plan to Environmental Engineering and VDOT providing for
on- and off-site drainage facilities. This plan shall be
approved by the Environmental Engineering Department and
VDOT, and all necessary easements shall be obtained prior
to any vegetative disturbance. The approved off-site plan
may have to be implemented prior to clearing. (EE)
7. The property shall conform to the Corridor Overlay Dis-
trict standards for Office Business (O) Districts. {P)
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applsgat~ and Mr. Dodd.
Absent: Mrs. Girone.
87S140
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, CHESTERFIELD COMMERCE
CENTER, LIMITED requested amendment to Conditional Use Planned
Developments (Cases 85S017 and 85S167) relative to setbacks,
u~es, buffers, and roads. This request lies in a Light
Industrial (M-i) District on an 11.9 acre parcel fronting
approximately 490 feet on the sast line of Branchway Road,
approximately 360 feet south of Midlothian Turnpike. Tax Map
17-9 (1) Parcel 7 (Sheet 8).
Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval cf this request, subject to certain ccndlticns.
sr. ~dward Willey, Jr. stated the recommended conditions were
acceptable, subject to his suggested changes tO Conditions 2
and 3.
87-921
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved Case 87S140, subject to the following conditions:
I. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by The Wilson-Moreth Partnership, revised August 10,
1987, shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
2. Uses permitted shall be as follows:
a. Ail B-i, E-2, and ~-1 uses
b. The following uses from the B-3 District:
1. Contractor's shop and storage yard
2. Exposition building or center, stadiums,
arena
3. Feed, seed, fuel, and ice sales
4. Public utility service buildings, including
facilities for construction or repair or
for the service or storage of utility
materials or equipment
5. Recreational establishments, indoor
6. Utility trailer and truck rental
7. Veterinary hospitals, boarding kennels or
clinics
8. Wholesale trade
9. Wholesale greenhouses. (P)
3. Ail utility lines such as electric, telephone, CATV, or
other similar lines, except thoss on the southern property
line, shall be installed underground. Ail junction and
access boxes shall be screened with appropriate
landscaping. Ail utility pad fixtures and meters shall be
shown on the site plan. The necessity for utility
connectionst Meter boxes, etc., shall be recognized and
integrated with the architectural elements of the site
plan. (P)
4. Architectural trea~-ment of building facades (whether
front, side, or rear} shall net consist of architectural
materials of inferior quality, appearance, or detail to
any other facade of ~he sa~ne building. The intent of this
requirement is not to preclude the use of difierent mate-
rials on different building facades (which would be ac-
ceptable if representative of good architectural design)
but rather, to preclude the use of inferior materials on
sides which face adjoining property and thus, might ad-
versely impact existing or future development causing a
substantial depreciation of property values. No portion
of a building constructed of unadorned cinder block or
corrugated and/or sheet metal shall be visible from any
adjoining property or public roads. Mechanical equipment,
whether ground-level or rooftop, shall be shielded and
screened from public view and designed to be perceived as
an integral part of the building. ~levations d~picting
these requirements shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for approval in conjunction with final site
plan review. (P)
5. ~×terior lighting shall be arranged and installed so that
the direct or reflected illumination does not exceed 0.5
foot candles above background measured at the lot line
adjoining any public roads and adjacent properties.
Lighting shall be of a directional type capable of shield-
ing the light source from direct view. A lighting plan
depicting these requirements shall be submitted to the
Planning Department in conjunction with final site plan
review. (P)
6. Ail outside storag~ areas and loading areas shall be
visually screened from adjacent properties and publfc
87-922
ll.
rights of way. A detailed screening plan depicting these
requirements shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for review and approval in conjunction with final site
plan review. (P)
Ail driveways and parking areas shall be paved. Concrete
curb and gutter shall be in,tailed aronnd the perimeter of
all driveways and parking areas. Drainage shall be de-
signed so as not to interfere with pedestrian access.
~xcept as noted herein, signs shall be as regulated by the
Community Business (B-2) District. Signs shall be as
follows:
a. One (1) freestanding sign, visible from Branch-
way Road, not to exceed fifty (50) square feet
in area, shall be permitted identifying this
development and the tenants therein.
b. Individual buildings shall be permitted one (1)
freestanding sign each, not to exceed five (5)
feet in height and an area not to exceed ten
(10) square feet. These signs shall be posi-
tioned and located so that they are not visible
from Courthouse or Pranchway Roads. These signs
shall be similar to each other in size, shape,
and material.
c. Building-mounted signs shall be permitted
provided they do not project above the roof line
and the aggregate area of the building sign,
plus the individual building freestanding sign
does not exceed 0.5 square feet for each one
foot of building frontage.
d. A site directory sign may be permitted provided
it does not exceed a height of eight (8) feet,
an aggregate area of thirty (30) square feet, is
not visible from Courthouse and Branchway Roads
and does not create a traffic obstruction.
e. Signs may be ill~uuinated, but may be luminous
only if the eignfield is opaque with translucent
letters.
f. Directional ~igns (entrance/exit, etc.) shall be
governed by Zoning Ordinance r~quirmmentm.
g. Prior to erection of any signs, a comprehensive
sign package to include colors, materials, and
typical de~ign~ shall be ~ubmitted to the
Planning Commission for approval in conjunction
with schematic plan review. The Planning
Commission may modify the requirements provided
the spirit and intent of the requirements are
met. (P)
Public water and sewer shall be used. (U)
Prior to the release of a building permit, thirty (30)
feet of right of way, measured from the centerline of
Branchway Road, shall be dedicated to and for the County
of Chesterfield, free and unrestricted. (T)
Prier to the release of an occupancy permit, additional
pavement, curb, and gutter shall be con~tructed to VDOT
standards along the entire property frontage of Branchway
Road. (T)
(Notes: (a) Conditions 1 through 11 supersede all
previously imposed conditions of Cases
$5S017 and 85S167.
87-923
(b) Prior to obtaining a building permit or
iinal site plan approval, schematic plans
must be submitted for approval.)
Ayes= Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate and ~r. Dodd.
Absent: Mrs. Girone.
87SI4I
In Matoaca Magisterial District, N.B. G00DWYN AND 80NS,
INCOkP0RATED requested re~oning from Agricultural (A) to Light
Industrial (M-l) with Conditional Use Planned Development on
7.7 acres, plus amendment to Conditional Use Planned
Development (Case $6S102) on an adjacent 8.7 acre tract
c~rrently zoned Light Industrial (M-I). A
commercial/industrial complex is planned. This request lies on
a total of 16.4 acres fronting in two (2) places on the west
line of Iron Bridge Road for a total of approximately 505 feet,
beginning at a point approximately 500 feet north of Landfill
Drive. Tax Map 96-13 (1) Parcels 12 and 16 and Tax Map 114-1
(1) Parcel 1 (Sheet 31).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to certain conditions.
Mr. Steve Armendinger stated the recommended conditions were
acceptable. He stated the applicant is willing to connect tO
public sewer, when available in the area, and does realize the
expense involved even though he is initially utilizing septic
tank and drainfield systems for his project.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved Case 87S141, subject to the following conditions:
1. The following Conditien~ notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by Bengtson, DeBell, Elkin, and Titus, P.C., dated
June 1987 and the Textual Statement submitted with the
application, shall be considered the Master Plan.
2. Public water shall be used. At such time as public sewer
is extended to serve Parcels 2, 3, 4, 5, and/or 6 on Tax
Map 114-1 (1}, directly east of the Goodwyn property,
public sewer shall be extended to the west side of Route
10 to serve the entire property. Prior to issuance of a
building permit, a bond shall be posted by the developer
in the amount of the estimated cost of the necessary sewer
extension. The cost estimate shall be approved by the
Department of Utilities. (U)
3. The large ditch to the rear of the property shall be
analyzed from the point of entranc~ of drainage from this
site, and any and all necessary i~provements, from that
point to the detention pond on the landfill property to
the west, shall be performed by the developer. (EE)
4. The permanent detention basins on the landfill site shall
be analyzed to determin~ if the facilities are adequate to
handle the increased runoff generated by the proposed
development. The developer shall make whatever improve-
ments are necessary to guarantee that the existing de-
tention basins are adequate.
5. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, 100 feet of
right of way, measured from the centerline of Route 10,
shall be dedicated to and for Chesterfield County, free
and unrestricted. (T)
87-924
(Notes: (a) The entire property lies within the
Corridor Overlay District and must comply with
applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements.
(b) Prior to obtaining final site plan approval
or any building permits, schematic plans
must be submitted and approved.
(c) The above conditions supersede all
previously imposed conditions of Case
86S102.)
6. The owner/developer shall notify the owner of Tax Map
96-13 (i) Parcel 15 of the date and time of any schematic
plan consideration. (P&CPC)
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate and Mr. Dodd.
Absent: Mrs. Girone.
87SI74
In Bermuda Magisterial District, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY requested
resoning from Agricultural (A) to General Industrial (M-2) with
Conditional Use Planned Development on a 1036.2 acre parcel
fronting on portions of the north, south, and east lines of
Ruffin Mill Road, east of Ricb-~ond-Petersburg Turnpike. Tax
Map 150 (1) Parcels 13, 14, and 30; Tax Map 150-3 (1) Part of
Parcel 6; Tax Map 150-5 (2) Madtke Valley Farms, Lots 7, SA,
8B, and Part of Lot 2A; Tax Map 150-9 (1) Part of Parcel 6; Tax
Map 150-10 (1) Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4; and Tax Map 151 (1)
Parcel 1 (Sheets 42 and 50).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Co~%miseion recommended
approval of this request, subject to certain conditions.
Mr. John Marling stated the reeo~ended conditions were
acceptable.
There was no opposition present.
Mr. Dodd commended staff for an expeditious and well prepared
request and stated amendment to the land uses to the northeast
would have to be considered at a later date as there was not
sufficient time to include that matter in this request.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
approved Case 87S174, subject to the following conditions:
1. There shall be no unpainted metal buildings. Colors shall
be subdued. The use of ornamental and/or decorative
featnres~ such as tr//n, landscapingt and surfaces composed
of varied materials and/or textures, shall be encouraged.
In conjunction with final site plan review, colored ren-
derings or elevations of structures shall be submitted to
the Planning Department for approval. (P)
2. Ail loading and outside storage areas shall be screened
from view of Muffin Mill Road. A screening plan shall be
submitted to the Planning Department for approval in
conjunction with final site plan review. (P)
3. All public and private roads, driveways, loading areas,
and parking areas shall be paved with concreted bituminous
concrete, or similar material. Surface treated parking
areas and drives shall be prohibited. Concrete curb and
gutter, as deemed necessary by the Environmental Engi-
neering Department for drainage and/or erosion control
purposes, shall he installed around the perimeter of all
paved areas. (P&EE)
87-925
Signs shall comply with the requirements of the Special
Sign District for Office Business (O) Districts. (P)
A twenty-five (25) foot parking setback and a fifty (50)
foot building setback shall be maintained along public and
private roads. Within these setbacks, landscaping con-
sisting of trees and/or shrubs shall be installed to break
up the view of large expanses of buildings and parking
areas as viewed from road~. A detailed landscaping plan
depicting these requirements shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for review and approval in conjunction
with final site plan review.
A 100 foot buffer for Light Industrial (M-l) uses and a
200 foot buffer for General Industrial (M-2) uses shall be
maintained adjacent to residentially zoned property. A
fifty (50) foot buffer ~hall be maintained adjacent to the
Swift Creek and Appomattox River floodplains. No
buildinqs, driveways, parking, or other facilities shall
be permitted within these buffers. Public roads, water
related transportation facilities (i.e., docks, crc. I, and
utilities may be per~nitted g~nerally perpendicular through
these buffers upon approval by the Planning and Transpor-
tation Department~ at the time of schematic plan review.
At the time of schematic plan review for each individual
parcel or lot which abuts the buffer, a conceptual land-
scaping plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for approval. The conceptual landscaping plan shall
include the general location of existing vegetation to be
retained, the location of proposed vegetative screening
and buffers, and extent of planting within the b~ffers. A
detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Plan-
ning Department for review and approval within ninety (901
days after rough clearing and grading of each site. In
cases where substantial completion of rough grading is not
complete at the date of this submission, an appropriate
extension may be granted by the Planning Department. This
condition may be modified by the Planning Department at
the time of schematic plan review if adjacent property has
been zoned for a similar use. (P)
The floodplains along Ashton Creek, Swift Creek, and the
Appomattox River shall be maintained in a natural state
and there shall be no clearing, grading, £illing, or any
facilities permitted within these floodplains. This
condition may be modified by the Planning and Environ-
mental Engineering Departments to permit necessary utility
uses and water related transportation facilities (i.e.,
docks, ~tc). (P)
9h~ ~cllcwing uses shall be permitted:
a. Ail Light Industrial (M-i} uses.
b. All General Industrial (M-2} uses except sani-
tary sewage tr~at-ment plants and outdoor ad-
vertising signs.
c. Public and private utility uses, so long as they
require a structure to include all water, sewer,
electric, gas, communications, and natural gas,
liquified petroleum gas, liquified petroleu~ gas
(LPG), and petroleum products transmission
facilities; in addition, natural gas, liquified
petroleum gas, and p~trol~um products trans-
mission facilities above- or below-greund. (P)
Schematic plans which conform to the conditions of zoning
may be approved by the Planning Depart~ent. The decisions
of th~ Director of Planning, relative to ~chematic plan
review, may be appealed to the Planning Commission. (P)
87-926
10. Public water and sewer shall be used. Wells may be per-
mitted by the ~irec~or of Utilities at the time of sche-
matic plan review. (U)
All storm water conveyance systems shall have rigid lin-
ings. This mondition may be modified by the Environmental
Engineering Department at the time of site plan review.
(EE)
12. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, forty-five
(45) feet of right of way, measured from the centerline of
Ruffin Mill Road, shall be dedicated to and for the County
of Chesterfield, free and unrestricted, but subject to
existing easements of record as of the date o~ approval o~
this request. A revised centerline for Ruffin Mill Road
northeast of the Piorucci site shall be submitted to, and
approved by, the Transportation Department. Forty-five
(45) feet of right of way from the approved revised
centerline of Ruffin Mill Road shall be dedicated to and
for the County of Chesterfield, free and unrestxicted, but
subject to existing easements. (T)
13. Additional lane of pavement shall be provided along the
entire property frontage. A phasing plan of these im-
provements may be submitted to the Transportation Depart-
ment for approval. (T)
14. The parking setback for preperty adjacent to Ruf£in Mill
Road shall bs maintained a~ a buffer. Other than util-
ities, access as approved by the Transportation Depart-
merit, landscaping, and signs, there shall be no facilities
permitted within this buffer. (T)
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate and Mr. Dodd.
Absent: Mrs. Girone.
Mr. John Cogbill commended staff for an outstanding job on this
project.
12. ADJOUI~]~{EN~
On motion of Mr. Apptegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, %he Board
adjourned at 5:40 p.m. (EST) until 7:30 a.m. (EST) on December
7, 1987, at the Sheraton Park, South on Route 60 for a
Legislative Breakfast meeting.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegats and Mr. Dodd.
Absent: Mrs. Girone.
County Administrator
87-927
Harry G.f Daniel
Chairman