01-14-1987 MinutesSupervisors in Attendance:
Mr. Harry (5. Daniel, Chairman
Mr. Jesse J. Mayes, Vice Chairman
Mr. G. H. ADplegate
Mr. R. Garland Dodd
Mrs. Joan Girone
Mr. Richard L. Hedrick
County Administrator
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Januar~ 14, 1987
Staff in Attendance:
Mr. Stanley Balderson,
Dir., Econ. Develop.
Mrs. Doris DeHart,
Legislative Coord.
Mr. William Diggs, Real
Estate Assessor
Mr. Bradford S. Hammer
Asst. Co. Admin.
Mr. william Howell,
Dir., Gen. Services
Mr. Thomas Jacobsen,
Dir. of Planning
Mr. Robert Masden,
Asst. Co. Admin. for
Human Services
Mr. Richard McElfisb,
Dir. of Env. Eng.
Mr. H. J. McCraoken,
Transp. Director
Mr. Steve Micas, Co.
Attorney
Mrs. Pauline Mitchell,
Dir. o£ News/Info.
Col. Joseph Pittman,
Chief of Police
Mr. Lane Ramsey, Dir.
of Eudget& Ace~g.
Mr. Richard Sale, A~t.
Co. kdmln, for
Development
Mr. Russell Sink,
Airport Manager
Mr. M. D. stith, Jr.,
Dir. of Parks & Rec.
Mr. David Welchons,
Dir. of Utilities
Mr. Dodd called the meeting to Order at 4:00 p.m. He stated he
had atte~ed a meeting at the Virginia Department of
Transportation, at which there were good indications that some
of the County's requested road projects may proceed quicker than
expected as money is coming in faster than anticipated. He
stated specific projects were not identified, nor were
time frames or completion dates.
1. ORGANiZATIORAL M~ETING
Mr. Dodd stated that presiding as Chairman had taught him that
the County has a multitalented, hardworking Board, each member
with his or her own areas of interest. He stated he felt the
County had a good year and he appreciated everyone's efforts, in
assisting him. He stated he felt the Board accomplished much
during the previous year and that the upcoming year would be
very challenging one.
Mr. Dodd turned the meeting over to Mr. Hedrick.
1.A. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAI~
Mr. Hedrick stated the first order of business would be th
election of Chairman.
87-2
Mr. Dodd nominated Mr. Daniel for Chairman for 1987.
Mr. Applegate made a motion to close the nominations. Mr. Mayas
seconded the motion.
Vote: Unanimeum
Mr. Daniel was elected Chairman by acclamation.
Mr. Daniel expressed appreciation to the Board for the honor and
trust bestowed upon him.
1.B. ELECTION OF VICE C~AIPAWAN
Mr. Dodd nominated Mr, Mayas as Vice Chairman for 1987.
Mr. Applegate made a motion, seconded by Mr. Dodd, that
nominations be closed.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Mayes was elected Vice Chairman by acclamation.
Mr. Mayas expressed appreciation to the Board for the honor
bestowed upon him.
1.C. APPOINTMENTS
It wam generally agreed to reaffirm the Board's committee
assignments, as submitted and to d~le~e the Metropolitan
Planning Organization (MPC) Goals Committee, as it has completed
its task; to delete the Virginia Association of Counties (VAC0)
off the list, as it was not established by this Board; to delete
the Committee on Planning Issues, as it has completed its task
and resulted in the establishment of the Planning Task Force; to
establish the School Beard Liaison Committee with Mr. Daniel and
Mr. Applegate serving; to delete the MPC Air Quality Technical
Committee off the list, as it is appointed by the MPC; and to
delete the Richmond Regional Water Resources Task Force off the
list, as it is not appointed by this Board.
It was generally agreed that the Board of Supervisors would
recommend that the School Board consider enlarging its selection
eo~ittee for the new superintendent and include citizens on
that committee.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
approved the Board Committees as amended, deleted committees as
speciiied, approved the addition of the School Board Liaison
Committee and appointed Mr. Dodd as the permanent representative
to the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Economic
Development Council (MEDC).
1.D. ADOPTION OF 1987 SCHEDUL~ FOR PdZGULA/{ M~=TINGS
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mrs. Gircne, the Board
set the second Wednesday of each month at 2:00 p.m. for work
sessions an~ instructed the county Administrator to provide a
specific schedule of work session topic~, dates and the
decisions and issues that will have to be determined by the
Board in the first quarter and in the second quarter and set the
second Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. and the ~ourth
Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. for regular meetings of the Board of
Supervisors. The County Administrator was instructed to provide
a list of the items for work sessions, the proposed dates, and
what decisions are required from those work sessions.
87-3
Mr. Hedriek stated regularly scheduled work ses~iona can be
planned accordingly.
Mr. Dodd stated he would like to suggest that on the December
9th meeting the time be changed from 2:00 p.m. to 9:00 a.m.
~r. Daniel pointed out that the County Administrator has
reooK~ended that the second meeting in ~ovember, 1987, be held
on November 12 since November 11 is a scheduled holiday.
After further discussion, Mrs. Girone offered a substitute
motion, ascended by Mr. Dcdd, that the Board met 2:00 p.m, on
the second Wednesday of each month for work sessions with the
reqnlar session Deginning at 7:00 p.m. with the exception of
November 11, which is a holiday and will be held on November
12; the fourth Wednesday of each month at 9:00 a.m. and with the
exception in December when only one meeting will be held which
will be the second Wednesday at 9:00 a.m.. It is noted the
County Adr~inistrator will provide, by the next meeting, a list
of items and an agenda for the work sessions for the first
quarter.
vote: Unanimous
1.c. APPOINTMENTS
Mr. Dodd stated members cf the Planning Cor~ission had indicated
to the Board that they desired to have a Board member appointed
to the Planning CoK~aission. He nominated Mr. Applegate.
Mr. ~k%yes stated there was once a Board member on the Planning
Conmmission, he Was taken off and inquired if the situation had
changed. Mr. Dodd stated he is reiterating the desires of the
Planning Commission as they felt having a Board member on the
Commission provided a liaison between the two boards.
There was considerable discussion regarding the Blanning
Commission retaininq its independence, technical versus policy
issues to be dealt with, the previous zoning policy adopted by
the Board, whether it would be in an advisory or voting
capacity, the advantage this Board member may have over other
Board members in zoning cases, the term of office, etc.
Mrs. Girone suggested the issue be deferred until the next
meeting since there were so many concerns and questions to be
addressed. Mr. ~ayes stated he felt it is unfair to the Board
member appointed and also unfair to the other Board members that
do not have the opportunity to have that same experience. Mr.
Dodd stated a delay until the next meeting would be acceptable;
however, he felt strongly that a commitment was made to the
Planning Commission and the County needed a Board member with
some expertise in zoninq. Mr. Mayas stated he felt the Board
should realize what its responsibilities are as policymakers.
He questioned if such action negates the policy that the Board
would not become involved in zoning case~ until after a decision
has been made by the Planning commission. Mr. Dodd stated
information can be provided indicating what the responsibilities
are.
It was generally agreed to defer consideration of appointing a
Board member to serve on the Planning Commission until January
28, 1987.
I.E. ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES FOR BO~ MEETINGS IN 1987 AND
READOPTION OF PRIOR BOARD POLICIES
Mr. Daniel stated the County has supported legislation for a
Board Clerk and he would like to use that job like other
municipalities with the Clerk calling the agenda at the
87-4
meeting~. ~e stated he would also like the Board Committee
Reports to be restricted to reports of the various committees
and their activities.
Mr. Daniel questioned if there are any formal changes from the
past policies that are in place.
Mr. Applegate questioned the passing of the gavel on the zoning
portion of the zoning meetings as he felt it unnecessary. Mr.
Applegate and Mrs. Girone stated they would like to have
additional information on the duties of the Clerk to the Board
of Supervisors. Mr. Daniel stated the Charter, as drafted,
stated that the Clerk will perform whatever duties the Board
assigns and he wanted to experiment with the concept of using
the Clerk like other municipalities do at their public meetings.
Hr. Daniel stated he would like the Clerk and County
Administrator to write all of the duties of the Clerk for the
Board's information as to how they would implement it, otc.
It was generally agreed to delete the rotation of the gavel at
the zoning sessions.
Mrs. Girone questioned if the Board wished to consider zoning
requests at night. It was generally agreed night meetings would
be difficult and that the schedule had already been adopted.
Mr. Applegate expressed concerns that the Board apply sound
business management techniques to uhe County Goverm~ent and and
he would like to see that paragraph in bold type, especially in
the area ci iinancial matters. He stated another concern he has
is that the Board always discusses Board policies and he would
like an outline of those policies. Mr. Daniel asked Hr. Hedrick
to have the appropriate persons search and prepare a document
that shows "the policies" that have either been adopted,
approved or passed onto administration. Mr. Hedrick stated
staff could prepare a list cf those policies for the Board's
review and then detail further if necessary.
Mrs. Girone suggested that, on page 19, consideration be given
to adding the phrase" or Assistant County Administrator" to the
paragraph regarding inquiries Dy Board members being made
through the Office of the County Administrator when it concerns
problems of administrative services to the County. Mr. Hedrick
common%ed %hat the Office cf the County Administrator has always
been interpreted to encompass the County Administrator and all
the Assistants, as well as the Budget Office. Hr. Daniel stated
"or Assistant County Administrators" will be included in said
paragraph on page 19.
With respect to page 20, Mrs. Girone questioned if the County
still has the traditional form of government or a Charter form.
Mr. Daniel stated the traditional form of government is still
effective as of today; even when the Charter passes, the
traditional form o~ government will continue through the end of
the year.
With respect to page 22, Mr. Mayes stated he felt th~ wording
"properly interpret" in the last two lines of the second
paragraph on that page should be changed to "execute". This was
agreeable by the Board.
with respect to page 20, item 97, Mrs. Girone questioned if it
were appropriate to make a statement evaluating or make a
statement regarding the County Administrator. Mr. Daniel stated
that if the statement were removed it would be interpreted that
the Board no longer has confidence in the County Administrator.
Mrs. Girone stated her intent is "not to comment in any way at
all" but she felt this is not the proper place to have such an
evaluation. Mr. Daniel stated whether it is or not is not the
point, as the Board has adopted it the first year the Board was
in session and we have reaffirmed it every year since he stated
87-5
if the statement i~ removed it will convey that the Board no
longer has confidence in the County Administrator. Mr. Mayes
stated he saw only one word which should come out; "express our
continued confidence" should be "express our confidence in
Richard L. Hedrick a~ County Administrator". Mr. Mayes stated
the Board is gearing up for a new year and if the County
Administrator has not been asked to resign then we should have
this ~tatement to say we express our confidence in him. Mr.
Dodd stated we are basically reaffirming what happened in
Williamsburg and this is the reaffirmation. It was generally
agreed to retain the statement.
Mrs. Girons stated, with respect to page 21, the phrase
"traditional County Administrator form of government" should be
a_mended to state "traditional form of government". This was
agreeable.
Mr. Applega~e questioned if the phzase "modern management
concept~" is understood by the Board. Mr. Daniel stated the
County Administrator is expected to bring modern management and
practice modern management techniques that are reasonable but it
is going to be one of those things that is interpreted.
Mr. Mayes questioned, with respect to page 23, if the word
"continued" is to be retained in line 8 of the paragraph.
was generally agreed to retain the wording as written.
Mrs. Girone questioned if there could be added to page 28 an
item which would ask the School Board to consider naming
citizens of the County to their ~earch committee for the
Superintendent selection. Mr. Daniel stated the School Liaison
Committee would take that information ~o the School Board, as
that relates to a specific item and is not necessarily a policy
statement. He stated the message will be transmitted but sheuld
not be part of this particular paper.
Mss. Gircne s~ated she ~alked with her School Board member and
suggested this might be an appropriate time for them to consider
doing a management study in the School Division. She stated
with a new superintendent coming on board it would be a
wonderful tool for him in his dealing with a new situation. She
stated =he School Board member reminded her that they had
finest administration in the state and questioned any
shortcomings which could be discussed with his Board to see
whether a management study was advisable. Mr. Daniel stated he
has talked with his School Board member about the same topic and
it was his under~tanding they would be happy to carr~ out as
many management s~udies as the Board would be willing to pay
for. He stated he felt it is something that would come under
the budget item. Mrs. Gircne stated she would like staff to
spend a minimal amount of time to jot down the problems they
have had with the same administration which might be covered in
a request for proposal. Mr. Mayes stated he thinks a study is
warranted with respect to the money that is being spent for
transportation and planning alone and that the study would be
very helpful. Mr. Daniel asked if the Board is suggesting that
the School Board Liaison Committee take back to the school Board
formally that the Board is asking for a Management Study. It
was generally agreed the School Committee would discuss this
matter. Mr. Applegate expressed concern that it may be
perceived that this is the first attempt by this governing body
to get into what we were criticized for prior to the vote on the
charter. Mr. Daniel stated the Board has talked with the School
Board on more than one occasion regarding the need for a
management study and the Board is saying now that, maybe, this
is the opportunity to reinforce that. Mr. Mayes stated he felt
me, ers of the Board need ~ome background in explaining to
constituents why =axes have to be raised and why taxes may have
to be raised in the future. He stated a study is needed to
point out those areas where additional resources are needed.
87-6
Mr. Daniel questioned if there are any other specific changes
regarding the Sohool Board document. Mr. Applegate stated the
School Board is already under this agreement and inquired if
they reaffirmed the agreement.
Mrs. ~irone stated page 23 contained Mr. Dodd's statement about
the Planning Commission and involvement in the zoning process.
She stated her position remains the same on this policy and she
would not vote for it. Mr. Daniel stated he felt there had been
a lot of misinterpretation regarding decisions being worked out
in advance; commitments that could not be kept; etc, Mrs. Girone
stated she felt that that is a matter of personal integrity and
she did not feel it could he legislated.
M~. Dodd excused himself from the meeting.
The Board recessed for two minutes.
Reconvening:
Mr. Dodd returned to the meeting.
Mr. Applegate stated some of the road priorities in the
Brandermill Statement have already heen updated, the Board is
still in agreement with the 70% residential/30% commercial; eto.
Mr. Daniel stated the Board votes regularly o~ road prioritie~
and the situation has changed since the Brandermill statement.
He stated the priorities are reaffirmed and each time the Board
has to make a statement to the State, the County Administrator's
staff sends out statements for the Board's approval whether it
be primary, secondary, other road projects and they are
constantly updated. It was generally agreed to leave the
statement as submitted.
Mr. Redrick stated it is interesting to note that most of the
other objectives that the Board set, in one form or another,
have been met with the exception of the road issues which are
not within the Board's control.
Mr. Applegate moved that the policies be adopted as amended,
with the exception of the zoning polioy. Mr. Mares seconded the
motion.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Dodd made a motion to defer until January 28, 1987 con-
sideration of the involvement in the zoning process statement
until the Board addresses the Planning Commission membership.
Mrs. Girone seconded the motion.
Vote: Unanimous
MrE. Girone a~ked, as a point of order, if the Board Travel and
District Expenditure Policy was included in the previous motion.
Mr. Applegate stated it was.
13.D.2. BINGO AND/OR RAFFLE PEP/~IT REQUESTS
Mr- Applegate requested to suspend the rules to allow Item 1.F.,
Request for Bingo/Raffle Permits for the Bishop Ireton Knights
of Columbus and Manchester High School Athletic Association, to
be heard out of order and to be added to the agenda. It was
generally agreed it would be appropriate to add the requests
under existing Item 13.D.2., Requests for Bingo/Raffle Permits
and vote on the item out of order.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
suspended the rules to permit the addition o~ the requests for
Bingo/Raf£1e Permits for the Bishop Ireton Knights o£ Columbus
and Manchester High School Athletic Association under Item
13.D.2. and for the item to be taken out of order; and approved
87-7
the following requests for bingo/raffle permits for the calendar
year 1987:
ORGANIZATION
St. Augustine Church
Matoaca High School Athletic Boosters Club
A1 Hartraw Jr., Chapter 50, Disabled Ameriea~
Veterans
Clover Hill Keynotes
Briarwood of Richmond Aquatic Club
Mi~lothian High School Band Boosters
Manchester High School Music Boosters
Bishop Ireton Knights of col~r0bus
Manchester High School Athletic Association
Vote: Unanimous
TYPE
Bingo
Bingo & Raffle
Binge
Binge & Raffle
~ingc
Raffle
Bingo & Raffle
Bingo & Raffle
Bingo &
2. DINNER AT AIR-WORT
On mo=ion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
recessed to the Crosswinds Kestaurant for dinner.
Vote: Unanimous
Reconvening:
Mr. Daniel called the re~tarly scheduled meeting to order at
the Courthouse at 7:00 p.m. (EST).
3. II, VOCATION
Mr. Daniel introduced Reverend Rarold Braxton, Pastor o~ Union
Branch Baptist Church, who gave the invocation.
4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCETOT~FLAGOF T~UN1Tmm STATES OF
A~ERICA
The Pledge of Allegiance
America was recited.
to the Flag
the United States of
Mr. Daniel expressed his appreciation for the honor and trust
bestowed upon him being elected Chairman. He stated the Hoard
has a very good record and ma~y accomplishments over the last
three years some of which were difficult. He stated, however,
the task has just begun, as growth continues to be with
us. He stated in 1984 we had approximately 166,000 people and
currently we have 190,000, which is shown in school age
Dopulation that has increased ~rom 35,000 to 38,000. He stated
the next Board elected in November will tell the public how the
population has increased to 231,000 and their school age
population has increased to approximately 49,000. He stated
this Board cannot sit back and rest on the laurels of the
accomplishments of thc previous three years; we owe it to the
Board that follows us to come forward and have it well
structured out so they can begin to work on the many growth
related problems that will be facing us in the future. He
stated that is why he felt it was so important that we have our
County Administrator fully document all the work sessions and
all the programs that we need to have in place so that the next
87-8
Boa~d oi Supervisors can immediately etep in end continue their
work rather than to have to go back and do what we have. He
stated he feels this Board can do it and it will not be a lame
duck seseion. He pledged that he would not take that attitude
and felt all have to have that rededication for commitment that
we all had three years ago, in this the fourth year.
5. A~PROVALOFMI~U3TES
5.A. DECEMBER 10, 198~
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the
approved the minutes of December 10, 1986, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
Board
5.B. DECEMBER 15, 1986
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
approved the minutes of December 15, 1986, as submitted.
Vote: Unanimous
5.C. JANUARY 6~ 1987
On motion of Mr. Dodd, ee~onded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved
the minutes oi January 6, 1987, as sub~itted.
Vote: Unanimous
6. COUNS~/AIk~INIST~ATOR'S CO~9~EN~S
Mr. Hedrick introduced and welcomed Mr. Pascarella and his
government students from Manchester High School who were present
observing the meeting.
Mr. Micas introduced Mr. David Hauck, recently employed
Assistant County Attorney, and outlined his educational and
professional experience. The Board welcomed Mr. ~auck to the
COUnty.
Mrs. Girone reported that House Bill 682 regarding off-peak
pumping will be coming before the General Assembly and is an
issue discueeed by ~ome of the Beard members for quite a while,
She stated the Bill discusses the underground storage tanks
being under the control of the State Water Control Board,
changing the emphasis ~rom the Health Department, etc. She
stated she £elt this is something ~hat the ~Qard shoul~ pass
along to th~ liaison to the General Assembly because it is an
item that could affect the County in the future. Mr. Daniel
questioned if the County has a position either way on that
i~ue. Mr. Applegate stated Mr. Hedriok could answer that as it
is under consideration by the staf~ at the present time.
Mrs. Girone stated the Virginia Association of Counties (VAC0)
recognized the hazardous waste effort in Chesterfield County as
it has ~¢¢ived State wide recognition and the County should be
very proud of the Extension Service and the Keep Chesterfield
Clean Committee and their efforts.
Mrs. Girone stated the Annexation Committee that she serves on
at VACO is monitoring the Commission on Local Government and
they are dealing with the structure of local government in
Virginia, the responsibilities of local government, the
conflicts if any between Counties, Cities and Towns, and making
87-9
recoK~endations on annexation. She stated the committee is now
working to lobby the appropriate committees in the General
Assembly for a moratorium which will be for 18 months until this
Con~ission makes its report. Mr. Daniel asked if this
moratorium is for counties and municipalities that are not
already exempt f~om annexation. Mrs. Sirone stated it would not
affect our ir~cdnity but there is a fear that aa the Commission
works and it becomes clear as to what they are going to
recommend that some annexation suits will be ~iled in order to
get in ahead of new legislation, so they are actively sponsoring
a moratorium.
Mr. Hayes stated ho was going to have to ~tlbmit a letter from
ABIDCO which has been reorganized and there are some commitments
that are being made that he thinks this Board should be aware
of.
Mr. Applegate noted the Richmond Regional Planning District
CoK~iasion and the Metropolitan Planning Organization both
submitted ~esolutions strongly requesting Virginia Department of
Transportation to give immediate attention to the construction
of the Chippenham/Laburnum Bridge and Connector. He stated
Congress has been requested to consider the matter and it is his
understanding they are.
Mr. Dodd stated he addressed the Highway Department this morning
and although it was not in our original statement he did
include, with the assistance of Menrico and Hanover County, the
resolution for 1-895, Mrs. Gi~one s~a~ed she had attended a
meeting at the General Assembly with the Highway Commissioner
who was wearing a badge that said something regarding releasing
the federal funds for roads and they are making a concerted
effort to lobby Congress to get the federal road money released.
She stated such action would definitely have an impact on
Chesterfield County, for example we have thought that the
widening of Route 60 would be underway right now, we had
expected the money to be released last fall and Congress did not
release it and the timing of delays are very bad. She inquired
if the Board would consider a resolution regarding this matter
to Congressman Bliley to get the money released as soon as
possible and call attention to the projects in this County that
are impacted. Mr. Daniel requested that the County
Administrator prepare the proper letter for his signature to the
representative of the County and forward copies not only to our
Congressman but to the two Senators and neighboring congressmen
who have constituents Very close to this region because it needs
to be ~einforced.
8. RE~).UESTS TO POSTT~DNE ACTION~ EMERGENCY ADDITIONS OR ¢RAN~ES
IN 'r~ ORDER OF PRESEN~ATIOI~
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Hayes, the Board
moved forward Item 12.E., An Ordinance to A~end the Code of the
county of Chesterfield, 1978, as Amended by Adding Article XXII,
Relating to Historic Districts and Landmarks, to be heard after
Item 9., Resolutio~e of Special Recognition; and adopted tho
agenda, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
9. RESOLUTIONS OF SPECIAL RECOGNITION
9.A. R. GArLaND DODD
On motion of the Mr. Hayes, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the
following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, The Honorable R. Garland Dodd~ Supervisor
representing Bermuda District, served as Chairman of the Board
of Supervisor~ in 1986, demonstrating leadership of the highest
caliber; and
87-10
WEEREAS, Mr. Dedd's dependability, reliability and
integrity have been recognized not only by the Board, the
Administration, and the County reeidents, but the Richmond
Metropolitan conmmunity and the Tri-cities communities as well
throuqh his active involvement and commitment to the
Metropolitan Economic Development Council, the Regional Port
Facility Task Force, the 1986 Legislative Tour and the Crater
Planning District CeK~ission; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Dodd was instrumental in the establishment cl
Henrious Park in Chesterfield County which is located on the
Jar~es River near Dutch GaD and was the second English settlement
in the new world and was actively involved in the initial stages
cf construction of Route 288; and
WHEREAS, under Mr. Dodd's Chairmanship, the County, one of
the fastest growing localities in the state and nation, faced
challenges and demands placed upon it and the Chesterfield
residents responded and approved the County Charter referendum
on November 4, 1986 which will streamline and make County
Government more efficient, effective and responsive te the
people.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors does hereby recognize and applaud the
untiring efforts and commitment to excellence displayed by its
1986 Chairman, Mr. R. Garland Dodd.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Daniel presented Fir. Dodd with the executed resolution and
congratulated him on a job well done. He stated Mr. Dodd has
given of himself willingly and in the best interest of all
Chesterfield County citizens. Mr. Dodd stated it has been a
privilege to serve the great County of Chesterfield and all its
citizens. He mtated one of the greatest privileges he has
experienced, as the Sermuda District representative to the
Board, has been dealing with and continuing dialogue with other
localities.
9,B, ~{R. GA~Y T. BAILEY UPON ACHIEVING RANK OF EAGLE SCOIIT
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Gary T. Bailey, son of Mr. and Mrs. William H.
Bailey, Jr. of 2113 Jarman Lane, ham attained the rank of Eagle
Scout, which is the highest rank awarded to a young man in the
Bey Sco~ts of America; and
WHEREAS, Gary has been a member of Troop 829 sponsored by
~t. ~athia$ Episcopal Church in Chesterfield County, Virginia
since June 1983; and
WHEREAS, Gary was a Patrol Leader, a Scribe, a Crew Chief
for the Florida High Adventure and a member of The Order of the
Arrow; and
W~ER~AS, Gary is a member of the Midlothian High School
Band and is a photographer for the basketball team; and
WHEREAS, Growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship and priding
himself on the great a~omplishments of his County, Gary is
indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens
of whom we can all be very proud.
Now, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Gary
T. Bailey and acknowledges the good fortune of the County to
have such an outstanding young man as one cf its citizens.
Vote: Unanimous
87-11
Mrs. Girone presented Mr. Gary Bailey with the executed
resolution and congratulated him on his achievement.
9.C. MR. SCOTT D. BAILEY UPON ACHIEVING RA~K OF EAGLE SCOUT
On motion o~ the Board, the following remolution wac adopted:
WHEREAS, Scott D. Bailey, son of Mr. and Mrs. William H.
Bailey, Jr. of 2113 Jarman Lane, has attained the rank of Eagle
scout, which is the highest rank awarded ~o a young man in the
Boy Scoute of America; and
WHEP~EAS, scott has been a member of Troop 829 sponsored by
St. MathiaK Episcopal Church in Chesterfield County, Virginia
since April 1982; and
W~EREAS, Scott was a Patrol Leader and a senior Patrol
Leader as well as a mem3oer of The Order of the Arrow; and
WHEREAS, Scott iea member of the Midlothian High School
Band a~d is a photographer for the basketball team; and
WtI~REAS, Growing through his experiences in ~couting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship and pri~ing
himself on the great aocomplisb_~ents of his County, Scott is
indeed a me~ber of a new generation of prepared young citizens
of whom we can all be very proud.
NOW, T~EREFOP~E BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Scott
D. Bailey and acknowledges the good fortune of the County to
have such an outstanding young man as one o~ its citizens.
Vote: Unanimous
Mre. Girone stated Mr. Scott D- Bailey could not be present to
accept his resolution; however, she presented his brother, Gary,
with the executed resolution and conveyed congratulations for
his achievements.
9.D. MR. PHILIP C. WENDT UPON ACHIEVING RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Philip C. wendt, son of ~. and Mrs. Donald R.
Wendt of 7504 Lantern Ridge Court, has attained the rank of
Eagle Scout, which is the highest rank awarded to a young man in
the Boy Scouts of America; and
WHEREAS, Philip has been a member of Tzoop 874 sponsored by
st. Luke's United Methodist Church in Chesterfield County,
Virginia since March 1983; and
WHEREAS, Philip has held the offices of Scribe, Assistant
Patrol Leader, Patrol Leader, Assistant Senior Patrol Leader and
Senior Patrol Leader, is a member of The Order of the Arrow and
also received the Arrow of Light while in the Cub Scouts; and
WHEREAS, Philip is also a member of the Manchester High
School's Science Club, is a photographer on the Year Book staff
and is a trainee in Sports Medicine; and
WHEREAS, Growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship and priding
himself on the great accomplishments of his County, Philip is
indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens
of whom we can all be very proud.
87-12
NOW, THEREFOR~ BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to
Philip C. Wendt and acknowledges the good fortune of the County
%o have such an outstanding young man as one of its citizens.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Daniel presented Mr. Wendt with the executed resolution,
congratulated him on his achievement and introduced Mr. and Mrs.
Donald R. Wendt and members of Troop 874 who were present.
10. ~EARINGS OF ClTIZ~ ON l.'l~SCH~.i)~rr.~3~ MA'.L"r~...~ OA
10.A. Claim o£ Mr. James M. Clapp
Mr. Micas briefly explained the claim of Mr. James M. Clapp. Be
stated, after reviewing the situation, it has been determined
that Mr. Clapp was appropriately disciplined by the Police
Department for failure to perform his duties and that the Bill
of Rights procedure was properly ~ollowed in all respects under
Virginia law and he recommended denial of the claim.
Mr. William R. Keow~, legal counsel for Mr. James M. Clapp,
clarified several ieeues regarding the investigation, the time
taken to inves%igate the allegations, reference to the
Policemen's Bill of Rights e~compassed in 2.1, the feeling that
the police officer's benefits were not adhered to, reference to
the oo~ittee make-up which he felt violated the statute, and he
referenced his letter which he felt outlined why they felt this
action was a violation of due process and a violation of the
statute which is the basis of the claim.
There was no one else to speak to the claim.
On motion o~ Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
denied Mr. J&mes M. Clapp's claim ~or $20,000, arising out of
disciplinary action taken by the Police Department for
dereliction of duty.
Vote: Unanimous
10.B. CLAIM OF MR. CHESTER F. SMITH
Mr. Micas briefly explained the claim of Mr. Chester F. Smith
relating to a decision of the Police Department which prevents
Mr. Smith, a CoLL~ty police o~ficer, from engaging in off-duty
employment utilizing his police powe~. He stated, afte~
reviewing the situation~ it has been determined that the
Bolioemen~s Bill of Rights is not applicable to the decision
made in this case and Mr. Smith cannot therefore claim damages
for the Department's failure to follow the Bill of Rights
procedure, and he reco~ended denial of the claim.
Mr. william R. Keown stated again the claim is encompassed in
his letter to the Board and he submitted the case on that basis;
he stated some of the same arguments apply as far as due
process; there are some factual differences, etc.
No one else came forward to speak to the matter.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
denied Mr. Chester F. Smith's claim for $45,000, relating to a
decision cf the Police Department which prevents Mr. Smith, a
County police officer, from engaging in off-duty emplo!anent
utilizing police power.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Keown stated as a ~tter of information, he plans to appeal
both decisions to the Circuit Court.
87-13
DEFERRED ITEMS
o APPOINTMENTS
ll.A. COMMUNIT~ SF~RVICES BOAI~D
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd~ the Board
appointed the following persons to the Community Services Board,
representing the following designated districts, and whose terms
will be effective immediately and expire as indicated:
Ms. Yvette B. Ridley (12-31-89) Matoaca District
Reverend Malcolm M. Hut%on (12-31-89) Dale District
Dr. Ronald J. Jessup (12-31-89) Dale District
Mr. Richard A. ~unnally(12-31~87) Bermuda District
Vote: Unanimous
CITIZENS TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COM~4ITTEE
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Maye$, the Board
appointed the following persons to serve on the Citizens
Transportation Advisory Committee, whose terms will be effective
immediately and expire December 31, 1988:
Mr, Cecil R. M~xson, Jr.
Dr. Nell J. Humphries
Mr. J. Ru~in Apperson
MS. Elaine Rubin
il.C. DRUG ABUSE TASK FORCE
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
appointed the following persons to serve on the Drug Abuse Task
Force, whose terms will be effectively immediately a~d be at the
pleasure of the Board:
Mr. Ralph Jones
Ms, Brenda Eriggs
Bermuda District
school Administration
It is noted Dale District still needs two nominations to this
Task Force.
ll.D. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TRE METROPOLITAN RICMMOND CONVEN-
TION AND VISITORS BUREAU
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
nominated Mr. Robert E. Brittle to serve on the Board of
Directors of the Metropolitan Richmond Convention and Visitors
Bureau, whose term is effective immediately and will expire June
30, 1987.
12. PUBLIC ~EARINGS
12.E. PUBLIC EEkRING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE
CODE OF ~ COUNTY BY ADDING ARTICLE XXII~ RELATING TO
HISTORIC DISTI{ICTS AND LANDMARXS
Mr. Hedrick stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider an ozdinance to amend the Code of the
County relating to the designation of historic districts and
landmarks.
$7-14
Mr. Micas stated this issue will ultimately have to be referred
to the Planning Commission but generally the ordinance sets up a
procedure in which the Board can designate the historic
district, historic sites and historic buildings. He stated, in
addition, any designated site or district within those districts
would have to obtain approval through a preservation committee
in order to cha~ge the exterior appearance or demolish any
building that was so designated. He stated generally a short
summary Of the ordinance all designations would have to be
made following the s~e process you follow today for zoning so
it would require p%tblic hearings and Board actions for any
designation before it would be subject to the special rules as
to changes in the exterior appearance er demolition within those
districts or on those sites. He stated.if adopted the Board
could then follow the normal zoning process and designate sites
or districts.
Mr. J. W. Pearsa11, representing the Board of the Chesterfield
Historical society, stated changes are occurring in Chesterfield
County very rapidly. Human experiences when decisions have to
be made under pressure are difficul~ to defend in retrospect and
are not always as circumspect as they should be, the pressures
for change are very great, the County needs to pause a little
bit ae it grows to make its decisions relative to things that
constitute our heritage and legacies. He stated since this is
essential to an orderly growth and a growth with which we can be
satisfied, we need to develop a sense of the importance of e~r
legacies as any future that is devoid of some mon~ents,
memorials, etc., of the past is a future devoid of an amenity, a
contribution to life's enjoYment, ete., is devoid of a cultural
appreciation of the best of every era which things are essential
to enjoy and perpetuate the life style to which we are
accustomed. He stated it caDIlot be denied that we happen to be
favored with being geographically and politically located at the
crceeroade where the action has been. He stated the Board
collectively has supported the volunteer efforts of members cf
the Chesterfield Historical Society to create an awareness in
the residents of Chesterfield of their heritage and rich history
and commended the ~oard for recognizing that as Chesterfield
becomes increasingly urbanized, Chesterfield must take on that
incident of urbanization by looking at the future to see what is
being done with our legacies as far as the future is concerned.
Ms. Virginia Wrenn, President of the Ben Air Historical Society,
stated the Society is most pleased that there will be a
preservation committee as they have worked very hard ~hrough the
years, with the Board'm support, in promoting and encouraging
the preservation of the land in Chesterfield County. She stated
the society has not had time to review the proposal but, after a
brief review, feels one addition should be made to the proposal
in that many landmarks should be honored and respected so that
those who follow will have something to also preserve. She
stated, on behalf of the members of the Ben Air Historical
Society Board, they are very interested in the establishment of
a preservation co~ittee and would like to have mere time to
thoroughly review the proposal in the event more additions could
be made to it.
Mr. Dryan Walker concurred with the previous speakers that the
County's heritage does need to be preserved; however, he stated,
at the same time, we need to be looking forward so we can grow
in an orderly fashion. He stated the first Iron Foundry in
A~eriea on Falling Creek, which at the present time is owned by
private concerns, has been well documented, etc., but there is
nothing to prevent the site from being destroyed. He stated he
hoped this ordinance would encompass ~hat site and possibly
others that would fit into the same category.
Mr. Moody stated he has been a resident of Chesterfield for 72
years and expressed concern that it will be difficult to
preserve the County's heritage for the younger generations. ~e
encouraged the Board to continue doing as it has with respect to
preserving the Ccunty'e heritage and legacies.
87-15
Mr. Steve Perkins, President of the Enon CiViC Association,
stated the people of the Bermuda District are very familiar with
the destruction of historical sites and have seen many of the
historic sites and artifacts hauled off in trucks and strongly
support this movement on the part of the Board. Me stated if
the ordinance amendment is passed, citizens will expect it to be
followed.
Approximately 60 persons stood in support of the proposed
ordinance. There was no opposition present,
Mr. Daniel stated the Board could not act on the proposed
ordinance amendment, as per the County Attorney's comments;
therefore~ the Chair would entertain a motion to remand the
proposal to the Planning Co~isslen.
Mrs. Girone expressed her appreciation for those coming down to
speak ~or the Ben Air Historical society and for their attention
to the matter. She stated she is looking forward to the
opportunity for having a public meeting in Ben Air to discuss
the subject. She stated she sent a copy of the proposal to
Betsy Weaver in Midlothian and read some of Ms. Weaver's
cerements into the record for the Planning Commission's
information. Mrs. Weaver's comments questioned where the
responsibilities of the Preservation Committee are spelled out,
how will the Preservation Committee be informed of thc details
of or receive a copy of the application; when does the
Preservation Committee receive an application; does the Planning
Commission prepare a separate ropor~, the Preservation Committee
a separate report; what clerical assistance would the latter
committee have; would a proper~y owner not requesting a historic
preservation designation be required to be included in a
historic designation close by and can he be included against his
will; no mention is made of historic trees and the shaving
the land and the envirorn~ent; the huge historic buckeye tree at
Wrexham was recently sacrificed but could have been a focal
point o~ a shopping center; the ancient holly trees (Route 60
near Watkins Nursery) should never be cut; and no purpose is
stated as to the formation of a Preservation Committee.
Mr. Dodd stated there is always some emergency that makes
democracy move and he thinks there is a situation in the County
where probably one of the oldest buildings, a more historic
building, is really under duress and threat of something
happening to it and that is why we are hoping the Board will
support going back to the Planning Commission with double
advertising with instructions to the Planning Commission that we
want to have this back in thirty days. He stated he has a
couple of sites in mind - one being Ware Bottom Springs in
Bermuda District. He stated he did not want to be impractical
to the point the Board will not be able to save these things
which really need to be saved.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
remanded this issue to the Planning Co~mi~sion for con-
sideration, with the understanding that the item is to be
returned to the Board of Supervisors for consideration within
thirty (30) days.
Vote: Unanimous
12.A. 86S172 - CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
86S172
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS will consider an amendment to Conditional Use
Planned Development (Case 84S156) relative to Condition 3
regarding dedication of right of way. This request lies in an
Office Business (O) District On a 0.44 acre parcel fronting
approximately 100 feet on the west line of Turner Road,
87-16
approximately 950 feet north of Cloverleaf Drive. Tax Map 29-1
(1) Parcel 4 (Sheet 9).
Mr. Jacobso~ stated at the direction of the Board of Supervisors
the planning staff presented this case to the Planning
Co,lesion which reoorm~ended deletion of Condition 3 which
requires the 45 foot dedication along Turner Road. He stated
the Planning Commission reco~ended insUead that Condition 3
shall be deleted and Condition 2 shall be amended to state:
"The access shall be as shown on the Master Plan".
NO one came forward to speak in iaver of er against the matter.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seeo~de~ by ~r. Dodd, the Board
approved this request, subject to the following condition:
With the exception of Condition 1, relative to the Master Plan,
Condition 2, relative to access, and Condition 3, relative to
th~ right of way dedication, all previously imposed conditions
of Conditional Use Planned Development 84S156 and 85S162 shall
remain in force. Speci£ically, Condition 3 shall be deleted and
Condition 2 shall be amended as follows:
Access shall be as shown on the Master Plan.
Vote: Unanimous
PUBLIC PLEAt{ING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND
COD~ OF TH~ COUNTY BY A~ENDIMG SECTIONS 20-1.30 AND
AND 20-1.35, RELATING TO COUNTY WATERAND SEWER SYSTEM
Mr. ~edrick stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance tc amend the Code of the
County relating to county water and sewer systems.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the matter.
On motion of Mr. Applegat~, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANC~ TO AMEND ON AN EMERGENCY BASIS TME CODE OF
THE CO%~T~Y OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY ~NDING
SECTIONS 20-1.30 AMD ~0-1.35, RELATING TO COUNTY
WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board ef supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Chapter 20 of the Code of the County of
Chestezfiel~, Virginia is amended and reenacted by amending the
following sections:
Sec. 20-1.30 Kequired uss of county water system.
Any individual structure for which a building permit has
been obtained after the e~fective date of this ordinance and
which is within two hundred (200) feet of a wa~er line shall
connect to the county water system.
Sec. 20-1.35 Required use of county sewer system.
Any individual structure for which a building permit has
been obtained after the effective date of this ordinance and
which is within two hundred (200) feet o~ a gravity sewer line
shall connect to the county sewer system.
vote: U~a~i~e~s
87-17
12, C. PUBLIC I~EARING TO CO~$IDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND
CO~E OF THE COUbrfYOF CHESTERFIELDr 1978r AS AMF/TD~Dr
BY AMENDING SECTION 8-19.1, PEP~ITTING THE LAT~ FILING
CE ANNUAL REVALIDATION FORMS AS PART OF THE SPECIAL LAND
USE PROGRAM AND PROVIDING FOR A LATE FILING FEE
Mr. Hedrick stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the Code of the
~ permitting the late filing of annual revalidatien iorm$
as part o£ the special land use proqram and providing for a late
filing fee.
No one ca~e forward to speak in favor of or against the matter.
Mr. Dodd stated support of the proposal as it provides the Board
with the latitude, under the law, to extend the filing date
until December 5th, which has been done by other localities
because so many people have missed the current deadline.
Mrs. Girone questioned if the filing deadline remains November
1, but citizens have until December 5 to file and pay a late
filing fee. Mr, Dodd stated that was correct. Mr. Applegate
stated it deals with hardship cases. Mrs. Girone stated she
agreed with the County Administrator's recommendation for denial
of this ordinance as the County goes through extensive means to
inform applicants of the need for revalidation and that at some
point there must be a deadline and applicants must assume some
responsibility themselves in adhering to the requirement. She
stated she felt the deadline with no extension would be more
appropriate.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
approved the following ordinance:
AN OP~DINANCE TO A~rD SECTION 8-19.1 OF THE CODE OF TM COUNTY
OF CFIESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, 1978, AS AMENDED, PEP~ITTING THE
LATE FILING OF A/~NUAL REVALIDATION FOP~MS AS PART OF T~E
SPECIAL LAND USE BROGRAM AND PROVIDING FOR A LATE FILING FEE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County cf
Chesterfield, Virginia:
(1) That the Code of the County o~ Chesterfield, 1978, as
amended, is amended by amending the following section:
Sec. 8-19.1. Same - Annual Revalidation.
in addition to any other obligations imposed by law, every
owner of property, for which an application has been appreved
under this article, shall revalidate such application annually,
on icrms provided by the county accesser. Completed
revalidation forms shall be filed with the oifice o~ the county
assessor no later than November 1 of each year; provided,
however, that a revalidation form may be filed after November 1
b~t no later than December 5 of each tax year upon the payment
of a late filinq fee of twenty-five dollars. Failure to
revalidate an application as provided in this ~ection will
invalidate the application and will cause the real property
described in such application to be assessed at its fair market
value for the following tax year and for subsequent tax years
unless all owners of such real property shall submit and have
approved a new application in accordance with the provisions of
this article.
(2) This ordinance is adopted on an emergency basis and
shall take effect i~edlately, st~bject to the holding of a
public hearing in accordance with state law.
Vote: Unanimous
87-18
12.D. PUBLIC HEARING TO CON~DER TBB CONVEYANCE OF A LEASE OF
REAL PROPERTY AT THE BIPJ) ATHLETIC COMPLE~ FOR TFfE OP-
ERATION OF FOOD CONCESSIONS
Mr. Hedrick stated this date and tim~ had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider the conveyance of a lease for real
property at the Bird Athletic Complex for the operation of food
concessions.
No one came forward t~ speak in favor of or against the matter.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Hoard approved
the lease for real property at the Bird Athletic Complex for the
operation of food concessions for the Chesterfield Girls
Softball 5eague for the period of January 1, 1~87, to December
31, 1989, which includes the standard provision for 10% of the
gro~ receipts to be returned to the County and authorized the
County Administrator to execute the necessary documents to carry
out this agreement.
Vote: Unanimol~s
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONgIDER A PLAN FOR LAND USE AbID
IMPROVEMENTS IN THE WESTERN AREA OF
CMEgTERFIELD COUNTYr W~ICH AREA IS BORDERED BY THE APPO-
MATTOX R!VER~ POWHATAN COUNTY~ HULL STREET ROAD AND
BRADLEY BRIDGE ROAD
Mr. Hedrick stated this date and time had been advertise for a
public hearing to consider a plan for land use and
transportation improvements in the wester~ area of the County,
which area is bordered by the Appomattox River, Powhatan County
Hull Street Road and Bradley Bridge Road.
Mr. Jacobsen presented a brief sun,mary of the Plan, which Plan
includes the western seventy-five percent of the Matoaca
District and the extreme western portion of the Midlothian
~istrict. He stated the Plan is predicated upon a 4% growth
Be
rate or approximately 16,000 residents by the year 2005.
stated the major goals of this Plan are to:
encourage the continued predustivity cf agricultural and
timbering operations for major portions of the western
area;
2) maintain the predominant charac=er cf the western area with
low intensity rural uses which are consistent with the
limited availability of public services;
3) allow limited expansion of urban development where a full
range of urban services, including water and sewer, can be
provided, which area is principally the northeast portion
of the study area;
4) protect the Appomattox River/Lake chesdin watershed from
incompatible high intensity development and maintain
capability for recharge of the water supply;
5) provide ~or continued low density residential development
preserving amenities and protecting the natural features
which are key attractions for potential residents;
6) reserve floodplain and other areas of severe development
limitations for very low-intensity non-urban use which is
compatible with the limited land capabilities of these
7) within the area of urban development, provide for a range
of densities in residential development which will allow a
variety of living environments with appropriate identity,
residential neighborhoods and communities;
87-19
8) provide for low-intensity recreational development along
Lake Chesdin and the Appomattox River to serve County
residents and tap opport~nitles for tourism while
. preserving the natural character of the land adjacent to
the Lake and protecting the quantity and quality of the
water supply;
9) concentrate major nonresidential land uses within the
designated areas of urban development where regional
accessibility to major transportation corridors and
services required to support higher intensity development
can be provided;
10) outside the area of urban development, provide ~or limited
convenience centers compatible in scale and character with
the predominant rural development; and
11) provide an efficient, cost-effective, convenient and safe
transportation system.
Mr. John Marling presented a slide presentation Of the proposed
land use and transportation map.
Mr. Dedd questioned the projection of only 4% growth in this
area. Mr. Jacobsen stated 4% annual growth is consistent with
County wide growth.
Mr. Mayas complimented staff on the development of the Plan in
that the concerned citizens were permitted input and are satisfie
with this development.
There was no opposition present.
Mrs. Girone expressed concern relative to the lack o~ planning
for the Lake Chesdin area. She stated the lakefront is going to
feel development pressures over the next 5 years--the Board
should accomplish a more intense level of planning along that
area, discuss public access, setbacks from the waterfront,
density and the placement Of buildings, plan the recreational
sites carefully; etc. She expressed concerns that if such
planning is not accomplished in this Plan and waiting for five
(5) years to revise the Plan will see commitments made that
would preempt any attempt at good planning. She stated the
County has been criticized for not planning ahead and
recognizing what will happen in future development. She stated
much of the criticism has been borne unfairly because it was
centered around roads and the fact was the County did not have
the money to build the roads even though there was a plan. She
stated the Board should move the planning of the Lake Chesdin
waterfront area forward and deal with it in the next year. She
also expressed concerns relative to where the Powhite Parkway is
planned to intersect Route 360 as development pressures at that
point will develop in the next 5 years and if the Board waits
until the Plan is reconsidered it will be too late again for
proper planning. She expressed concerns relative to looking at
the overlay district concept and the R-88 proposal for zoning as
they relate to each other. ~he stated she would like the Board
to consider de,arming the matter and having a work ssssien on
the entire package - the Western Area Plan, the R~88 zoning and
the Overlay District and consider all as they relate to one
another.
Mr. Mayas stated that he felt that the delay in developing the
R-88 proposal was waiting to complete the work on the Western
Area Plan and now that it is completed, the R-88 should be
considered.
Mr. Jacobsen stated the second ph%blic hearing set by the
~lanning Co~mission ~er consideration of the R-88 zoning
classification district is February 27, 1987, in addition to
consideration of amendments to the Agricultural (A) District.
He stated the philosophy was that the ~lan should be considered
and adopted by the board first and then the ordinance amendment
is seen as an implementation action - a strategy taken after the
adoption o~ the general guidelines of the Plan.
Mr. Mayes stated the R-88 zoning classification will facilitate
both the Southern and Western Area Plans.
Mr. Applegate stated be would prefer to have a work session on
this Plan as has been done on all other previous plans. Be
stated he did not feel the Plan adequately addressed certain
issues.
Mr. Mayes ~tated that he felt the Board should take action on
the Blah as submitted.
Mrs. Girane questioned the location of the public access to Lake
chesdin. Mr. Hedriok stated the question of public access deals
more with publioly held property that allows people direct
access to the waterfront as opposed to roadways. He stated one
of the concerns of the Capital Improvements Progre_m will be
dealing with the question of public access to Lake Chesdin and
the James River. Mr. Daniel stated he did not see that whether
or not the public has assess to the system is a land use
question because the use will still be the same whether tko
public er private sector uses it; he stated he sees it as a
budget constraint, not a land use planning constraint. Mr.
Hedrick stated that, at this juncture, the Parks and Recreation
Department is interested in a prsject on Lake Chesdin and the
Planning staff, as well as Utility staff, would prefer to see
thc area in and around the Lake remain in its natural state as
Much as possible in order to protect the water reservoir and
ultimately the issue will have to be addressed by the Board.
Mr. Jacobsen stated that in the Plan there is a list of
strategies and actions recomended after ~he Plan is adopted and
within that, the strategy recommends reserving areas of Lake
Chesdin and the Appomattox waterfront for recreation and
providing public access for water oriented activities. Me
stated there is also a series of more specific reoo~mendations
which address pedestrian trails, bicycle trails, etc. along the
scenic and points of recreational interest. He stated further
planning and development work is needed to look at guidlag
development within that area.
Mrs. Girone stated she did not feel the Plan is adeqn/ate and
expressed concern that development choices will be made without
planning because the Plan is not a strong e~0ugh statement or
Plan. She stated she feels the same about the juncture of Route
360 and the Powhite Parkway as she does no~ believe that for the
next five (5) years it is wise for the Board to assume that this
area is going to remain an agricultural area. Mr. Daniel stated
the Central Area Plan is a good example of how a Plan can be
approved and then modified to meet specific concerns of the
citizens and/or the Board and this can be accomplished for this
Plan as well.
Mr. Mayes stated this Plan is the first step in other actions to
b~ taken and until the first step is taken other actions that
are pending will be held up. ~e stated he felt staff has done a
wonderful job on this Plan an~ holding it up would be a
disservice to the County. Mr. Dedd stated he felt that if the
Plan needs further refinement, it will came in the future.
Mr. Applegate questioned if the Plan were prepared by
oonsultan%s and asked what was the scope given to them when they
were contracted to prepare the report. Mr. Jacobsen stated a
lot of the data collection and preliminary ideas originated ~r0m
the consultants Harland, Bartholomew and Associates; however,
the Planning staff and Picturing co~ission reviewed that data
and rewrote sections of it. Mr. Medrick stated this Plan to a
large extent is the result of a number of neigb_borhood type
meetings that were held after the original plan was developed by
tko consultants and the planning staff and some amendments and
adjustments were made along the way to accommodats the qeneral
feelings of those people - both developers and citizens - so the
Plan is a combination of staff/consultant work a~d oorm~uni~y
cerements and guidance. He agreed with concerns that development
87-21
pressure in the Powhite/Route 28B/ Rout~ 60/Route 360 corridors
will be intense and there will be increased development pressure
in and around the Lake Chesdin area and he suggested the Board
follow through with adopting this Plan and let staff bring back
to the Board at its next meeting a schedule as to when staff can
develop a more detailed plan to deal with these two areas.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board adopted
the following re~olution:
WNER~AS, Title 15-1, Chapter 11, Article 4, of the Code of
Virginia, provides for the preparation and renewal of a
comprehensive plan for all virginia localities and allow~
preparation of this plan in parts; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield Board o~ Supervisors requested
that the Chesterfield Planning Commission review the existing
Plan for the Western Planning Area and to determine if revisions
to the General Plan 2000 were needed; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield Planning commission has
considered proposed plan alternatives and has held public
hearings on the proposed Plan revisions.
NOW, THEREFOr, L~T IT BE RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
Planning Commission recom~ends that the Chesterfield Board of
Supervisors adopt the Planning Sta~'s recommended Plan in its
entirety as presented to the Commission.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes and Mr. Dodd.
Nays: Mr. Applegate and Mrs. Girone.
Mrs. Girone stated the reason she could not support the motion
is that she felt the Plan inadeguate.
Mr. Mayes directed staff to come forward with the R-88 zoning
classification at the earliest practical date to facilitate both
the Western and Southern Area Plans. Mrs. Girone directed staff
to come back within thirty (30) days with a recommendation on
the Lake Chesdin frontage and the Powhite/Route 360 area to
address the next five (5) years. Mr. Hedrick suggested that
possibly it would be best to meet with the Board members
individually to discuss the overlay districts that the Planning
Commission has currently under consideration, the R-88 zoning
districts and the question of the two speei£ic Plans as well as
some others in a work session so that it i~ all related and ~an
be dealt with in a complete package. ~t was generally agreed
that a work so,mien would be scheduled to discuss these items.
12.G. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE CONVEYANCE OF A TP~ACT OF
LAND CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 2.8 ACRES ON THE EAST SIDE
OF REYCAI~ ROAD AT AIP~PORT INDUSTRIAL PAi~K TO MR. L. R.
5UCORD, JR,
Mr. Hedrick stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider the ~onveyan~e of a tract of land at
the Airport Industrial Park. Mr. Balderson stated this item
deals with the sale of approximately 2.8 acres on the east side
of Reycan Road at the Airport Industrial Complex to Mr. L. R.
Lueord, Jr.
~r. L. R. Lucord, Jr. was present.
There was no opposition present.
Mr. Applegate expressed concern regarding the memo which
include~ a ~tate~e~t that several members of the Board had
concerns regarding the r~cemmended price increase in the sale
price for Airport Industrial Park property. Mr. Dodd stated he
had concerns that the price was too low; however, negotiations
were in process prior to the setting cf this sale price and
should be honored. Mr. Applegate stated he was concerned that
the County Assessor's Office sets the appraisal of property for
tax reasons but did not for the Airport. Mr- Hammer stated Mr.
87-22
Digge had expressed remervations about the Assessor's office
setting the fair market value for the property but the
Assessor's Office is, at the present time, involved in finishing
the present Levy Book and unable to work on such projects.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved
and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary
documents for the sale of a 2,8 ~ tract (at $25,000 per acre),
lo~ated on the cast side of Reycan Road to Mr. L. R. Lucord,
Jr., with the Berkness Corporation, currently located in the
City of Richmond.
Vote: Unanimous
13. NEW ~USINESS
13.A. JAIL ADDITION ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
On motion Of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved
and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary
dOeLaments to enter into a contract with DePa~quale & Associates
for the design of the addition to the Chesterfield County Jail
at a fixed fee including expenses not to exceed $31,849 and
appropriated the necessary funding from the General F%L~ld. It is
noted that approximately $75,000 in state funding will be made
available 'from the Department of Corrections to offset the
County costs of this project and the Legislative liaison for the
County will request that the Senate Finance and Appropriation
Committees in the General Assembly amend the appropriation Act
for that $76,000 that has been approved by the State Board of
Corrections.
APPROPRIATION FOR AIRPORT TERMINAL RENOVATION AN~ PRE-
APPLICATION FOR STATE FUNDING
Mr. Howell presented a brief sur~mary of the request and
explained the proposed project. He stated if the Airport
Terminal renovation proposal i~ approved, $100,400 in County
matching funds will be required, which funds would be provided
from the Industrial Park Reserve Account. He stated the
expansion to the parking lot would include an additional 72
parking spaces.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to submit a
preapplication for assistance for the proposed projects
(refueling pumps at underground fuel tanks~ terminal building
renovation, overlay existing parking lot and expand parking
lot), and upon approval to ~uhmit an application; and
appropriated $150,000 from the Industrial Park Reserve Account
for the Airport Terminal Renovation Project.
Vote: unanimous
13.c. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS
13.C.1. P~SOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR ROUTE 895
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the 1-895 Connector has been on regional highway
plans in various forms since 1968; and
WHEREAS, the 1-895 Connector project has been an approved
project by the Federal Highway Administration (FB-WA) since June
13, 1984; and
87-23
WHEREAS, the 1-895 Connector is a project o~ vital
importance to the economic development of the Riehmen~ region;
and
WHEREAS, the 1-895 Connector will provide for greatly
improved access to the Richmond International Airport, as well
as significaxtt travel and access benefits for the Richmond
region; and
WHEREAS, the current Virginia Department of Transportation
(VDOT) FY 1986-87 Allocation of Funds document has allocate~
only $1,000,000 toward the total estimated project cost of
$175,000,000; and
WHEREAS, the Tentative Revised VDOT FY 1986-87 Allocation
cf Funds document provides ho additional funding for this
project; and
WHEREAS, the lack of Congressional action to enact
legislation to reauthorize federal-aid highway programs for FY
1987 may delay vital engineering design work for the 1-895
Connector in Chesterfield and Renrieo Counties.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby requests that the Virginia
Department of Transportation allocate fundm am necessary to keep
the 1-895 project on schedule; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board
of Supervisors does hereby request that the Virginia Department
of Transportation allocate additional funds to the i-895 project
in order to proceed with the earliest possible construction of
this vital regional highway project.
Vote: Unanimous
13.c.2. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CCrk~;EYANCE OF
A PARCEL OF LAND AT TME AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL PARR TO R
A PARTI~_~SHIp dba/COLONIAL BEAUTY AND BARBF~R~ SUPPLY
COMPANY AND AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF CONTINGH~NT SALES
CONTRACT
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board set
the date of February 11, 1987, at 7:00 p.m., for a public
hearing to consider the conveyance of a parcel of land at the
Airport Indumtrial Park to R & A Partnership dba/Colonial Beauty
and Earbers supply Company and authorized the County
Administrator to execute a contingent sales contract.
Vote: Unanimous
13.C.3. AWARD CONSTt~UCTION CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF W~ITE-
PINE ROAD EXTENSION, PHASE I
On motion of Mr, Applegate, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
appropriated $446,968.83 from the Industrial Park Reserve
ACCOUnt £or the construction of Whitepine Road Extension, Phase
I; and further approved and authorized the County Administrator
to execute a construction contract to the low bidder, shoosmith
Bros., Inc., for the construction o~ Whitepine Road Extension
Phase I, in a~ a~ount o~ $39~,96~.83.
Vote: Unanimous
13.c.4.
P~ESOLUTION REQUESTING U.S. POSTAL SERVICE TO CONSIDER
CO~IBINING CHESTER AND CHESTERFIELD POST OFFICES INTO
ONE FACILITY
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by ~r, ~ay~s, the Board approved
the following resolution:
87-24
WHEREAS, the U. S. Postal Service is currently studying
alternative solutions for expanding postal facilities servicing
Chester, Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the postal facility located in nearby
Chesterfield, Virginia is also inadequate for the growing
demands being placed on it; and
WHEREAS, it may be poe~ible to achieve more economical
service a~d better facilities through a corabination of the two
facilities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors requests the U. S. Postal Service to
consider the possibility of aombining both post offices into one
facility to be located conveniently to both Chester and
Chesterfield, Virginia.
Vote: Unanimous
13.D. CONSENT ITEMS
13.D.1. APPLICATION FOR MIG~WA¥ gk~ETY PROJECT GRANT FOR POLICE
DEPAR~E~T
On motion o~ Mr. Applega~e, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved the appliaatio~ and acceptance of funds, if approved,
of a Drag Sled Mini-Grant Proposal, in the amount of $1,200,
from the federal government, to obtain two drag sled measurement
systems and the necessary related equipment, which equipment
will enable accident investigators to utilize skidmark evidenae
for speed determination during investigations. (It is noted
that no County funds are necessary.)
Vote: Unaniraous
13.D.3. STATE ROAD ACCEPTAI~CE
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directionE from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Sand Hills Drive, Pine Meadows Circle and Evelyn
Drive in Craddoek Point, Sections 3 and 4, Bermuda District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Daniel~
seconded by Mr. Dodd, it is resolved the= Sand Hills Drive, Pine
Meadows Circle and Evely~ Drive in Craddock Point, Sections 3
and 4, Bermuda District, be and they hereby are established as
public roads.
And be it £~rther resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the
Secondar~ System, Sand Mills Drive, beginning where State
Maintenance ends, Sand Hills Drive, State Route number not yet
assigned, and running westerly 0.06 mile to the intersection
with Pine Meadows Circle, then continuing westerly 0.05 mile to
the iNtersectio~ with Evelyn Drive, then continuing
southwesterly 0.27 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Pine Meadows
Circle, beginning at the intersection with Sand Hills Drive and
running northerly 0.06 mile to tie in~c existing Pine Meadows
Circle, State Route number ~ot yet assigned; and Evet~rn Drive,
beginning a~ the intersection with Sand Hills Drive and running
~outherly 0.12 mile to tie into existing Evelyn Drive, State
Route 1567.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance
and designated Virginia Department of Transportatio~ drai~ag~
easements.
These roads serve 53 lots.
87-25
And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia DepaMtment of T~ansportaticn a 50'
right-of-way for all of these roads.
These sections of Craddook Point are recorded as follows:
Section 3. Plat Book 47, Page 77, November 2, 1984.
Section 4. Plat Book 50, Pages 42 & 43~ August 12, 1985.
Vote: Unanimous
This day the County Environmental Engineezlng, in accordance
with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Ludgate Road, Biltmore Road, Ludgate Place, Eagle
Point Road and Ludgate Court in Summit Point and a portion of
Trueheart Heights, Section 3, Bermuda District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Daniel,
seconded by Mr. Dodd, it is resolved that Ludgate Road, Biltmore
Road, L~dga~e Place, Eagle Point Road and Ludgate Court in
Summit Point and a portion of Tr~eheazt Heights, Section 3,
Bermuda District, be and they hereby are establishc~d as public
roads.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it hereDy is requested to take into the
Secondary System, Ludgate Road, beginning where State
Maintenance ends, existing Ludgate Road, State Route 1660, and
running easterly 0.12 mile to the intersection with Ludgate
Place, then continuing easterly 0.08 mile to the intersection
with Biltmore Road, ~hen continuing easterly 0.09 mile, then
turning northerly and running 0.15 mile to end in a cul-de-sac;
Biltmore Road, beginning at the intersection with Ludgate Road
and running southerly 0.07 mile to the intersection with Wood
Dale Road, State Route 1587, Ludgate Place, beginning a% the
intersection with Ludgate Road and running northeasterly 0.08
mile to the intersection with Eagle Point Road, then continuing
northeasterly 0.04 mile to the intersection with Ludgate Court,
then continuing northeasterly 0.07 mile to end in a cul-de-sac;
Eagle Point Road, beginning at the intersection with Ludga~e
Place and running northwesterly 0.03 mile to tie into existing
Eagle Point Road, State Route 5280; and Ludgate Court, beginning
at the intersection with Ludgate Road and running southeasterly
0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance
and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage
easements.
These roads serve 81 lots.
And be it further resolved, that the Board Of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50'
right-of-way fsr all of theee roads except Ludgate Court which
has a 40' right-of-way.
Summit Point iE recorded as follows:
Plat Book 46, Pages 46 & 47, July 3, 1984.
·his section of Trueheart Heights is recorded as follows:
Section 3. Plat Book 17, Page 41, November 19, 1969.
Vote: Unanimous
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Towchester Drive, Allworthy Lane and Soundview
Lane in Creekwcod, Section E-3, Clover Hill District.
Upon consideration whereof, and On motion of Mr. Daniel,
seconded by Mr. Dcdd, it is resolved that Towchester Drive,
Allworthy Lane and Scundview Lane in Creekwood, Section F-~,
Clover Hill District, ~e and they hereby are established as
public roads.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it here~y is toques%ed to take into the
Secondary System, Towchester Drive, beginning at existing
Towchester Drive, State Route 2258, and going northwesterly 0.05
mile to the intersection with Allworthy Lane, then continuing
northwesterly 0.05 mile to the intersection with Scundview Lane,
then continuing northwesterly 0.04 mile to a dead end~ Allworthy
Lane, beginning at the intereeotion with Towchester Drive and
going northerly 0.12 milo tc end in a cul-de-sac; and Soundview
Lane, beginning at the intersection with Towchester Drive and
going northerly 0.12 mile to end in a cul-de-sac.
This r~quest is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance
and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage
easements.
These roads serve 33 lots.
And be it further re~olved, that the Board of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50'
right-of-way for Allworthy Lane, a 60' right-of-way for
Towchester Drive, and a variable 50' to 65' right-of-way for
Soundview Lane.
This section of Creekwood is recorded a~ follows:
Section F-3. Plat Book 49, Page 57, June 5, 1985.
Vote: Unanimous
This day the County Environmental ~ngineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Newby's Wood Trail, Quail Ridge Road and ~uail
Ridge Terrace in Newbys Wood, Sec%ion A, Clover Hill District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Daniel,
seconded by Mr. Dodd, it is resolved that Newby's Wood Trail,
Quail Ridge Road and Quail Ridge Terrace in Newbys Wood, Section
A, Clover Hill District, be and they hereby are e~tablished as
public roads.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it herehy is requested to take into the
Secondary System, Newby's Wood Trail, beginning at the
interseetio~ with Burnett Drive, State Route 743~ and going
northerly 0.10 mile to the intersection with Quail Ridge Road,
then continuing northerly G.02 mile to tie into proposed Newby's
Wood Trail, Newbys Wood, Section B; Quail Ridge Road, beginning
at the intersection with Newby's Wood Trail and going easterly
O-10 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. Again, Quail Ridge Road,
beginning at the intersection with Newby's Wood Trail and going
northwesterly 0.09 mile to the interseotio~ with Quail ~idge
Terrace, then continuing northwesterly 0.10 mile to end in a
temporary turnaround; and Quail Kidge Terrace, beginning at the
intersection with Quail Ridge Road and going westerly 0.16 mile
to end in a cul-de-sac.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance
and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage
easements.
These roads serve 28 lots.
And be it further resolved, that the Beard of Supervisors
~%~arantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50'
right-of-way for all of these roads.
87-27
This section of Newbys Wood is recorded as follows:
Section A. Plat Book 48, Pages 64 & 65, February 13,
Vote: Unanimous
1985.
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions £rom this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Ladue Road, Chanson Road and Chipping Drive in
Salem Woods, Sections F, G, and a portion of Section A, Dale
District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Daniel,
seconded by Mr. Dodd, it is resolved that Ladue Road, Chanson
Road and Chipping Drive in Salem Woods, Sections F, G, and a
portion of Section A, Dale District, be and they hereby are
established am p~blio roads.
k~d be it further remolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the
Secondary System, Ladue Read, beginning at the intersection with
Old Watson Drive, State Route 1905, and running northeasterly
0.18 Mile to the intersection with Chanson Road, then continuing
northeasterly 0.05 mile to the intereection with Chipping Drive,
then continuing northerly 0.13 mile to the intersection with
Aberdare Drive, State Route number not yet assigned; Chanson
Road, beginning at the intersection with Ladue Road and running
northwesterly 0.04 mile to tie into existing Chanson Road, State
Route 1903~ and Chipping Drive, beginning st the intersection
with Ladue Road and running southeasterly 0.22 mile to the
intersection with Aberdare Drive, State Route number not yet
assigned.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent sloper sight distance
and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage
These roads serve 67 lots.
And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50'
right-of-way for all of these roads.
These sections of Salem Woods are recorded as follows:
Section F. ~lat Book 49, Pages 77 & 78, July 1, 1985.
Section G. Plat Book 49, Pages 77 & 78, July 1, 1985.
Section A. Plat Book 24, Pages 53, 54, 55, July 31, 1975.
Vote: Unanimous
Thi~ day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Woodland Pond Parkway, Waterfowl Flyway,
Merganser Terrace, widgeon Way, Sawdust Trail, Eider Landing and
Canvasback Circle in Woodland Pond, Section 1, Matoaca District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Daniel,
seconded by Mr. Dodd, it is resolved that Woodland Pond Parkway,
Waterfowl Flyway, Merganser Terrace, Widgeon Way, Sawdust Trail,
Bider Landing and Canvasback Circle in Woodland Pond, Section 1,
Matoaoa District, be and they hereby are established as public
roads.
And be it ~urther resolved, that the Virginia Department o~
Transportation, be a~d it hereby is requested to take into the
Secondary system,, woodland Pond Parkway, beginning at the
intersection with Beach Road, State Route 752, and running
southerly 0.51 mile to the intersection with Waterfowl Flyway,
then continuing southerly 0.01 mile to tie into proposed
87-28
Woodland Pond Parkway, Woodland Pond, Section 2; Waterfowl
Plyway, beginning at the intersection with Woodland Pond Parkway
and running easterly 0.30 mile to the intersection with
Merganser Terrace, then continuing easterly 0.05 mile to end in
a dead end; Merganser Terraoe~ beginning at the intersection
with Waterfowl Flyway and runninq southerly 0.11 mile to the
intersection with Widgeon Way, then continuing southeasterly
0.08 mile to the intersection with Sawdust Trail, then
continuing southeasterly 0.04 mile bo the intersection with
Eider Landing, then continuing southerly 0.09 mile to the
intersection with Canvasback Circle, then continuing southerly
0.14 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Widgeon Way, beginning at the
intersection with Merganser Terrace and running westerly 0.10
mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Sawdust Trail, beginning at the
intersection with Merganser Terrace and running easterly 0.07
mile to end in a chi-de-cap; Eider Landing, beginning at the
intersection with Merganser Terrace and running westerly 0.09
mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Canvasback Circle, beginning at
the intersection with Merganser Terrace and running westerly
0.09 mile to end in a cul-de-sac.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance
and designated Virginia Depart_ment of Transportation drainage
easements.
These roads serve 57 lots.
And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50'
right-of-way for all of these roads except Woodland Pond Parkway
which has a variable 70' to 130' right-of-way.
This section of Woodland Pond is recorded as follows:
Section 1. Plat Book 51, Pages 56, 57, 58 and 59, November 15,
1985.
Vote: Unanimous
13.E. UTILITY ITEMS
13.E.1. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC SEWER SERVICE AT 5200 IRONBRIDGE
ROAD
Mr. Welchons stated stafi has reviewed the request from Mr. J.
E. Payne, who resides at 5200 Ironbridge Road, for sewer service
and found that the sewer extension to serve Mr. ~ayne's house
was deleted from the Gravelbrook Farms project due to a proposed
development mt the southwest quadrant of Route 150 and Route 10
interchange, which called for removing Mr. Payne's house to
obtain better road access to Route 10. He stated, therefore, Mr.
Payne's house wa~ not served at that time, and according to
Health Department's report he is now experiencing sepPic ~ank
problems. Mr. Daniel stated that since the previous Board made
the commitment to install the sewer service, this Board has no
choice but to make the installation.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the Utilities Department to proceed with
public sewer service at 5200 Ironbridqe Road and that $15,000 be
transferred from the 1986-1987 extension fund 5P-5835-900R to
5P-5835-705R.
13.E.2. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS
13.E.2.a.
CONSIDER CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ALBERT M.
BARTLETT FOR SEWER ~ASENENT FOR E~LTON PARK SUEDIVI-
SION SEWER PROJECT
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
authorized the County Attorney to institute condemnation
87-29
proceedings against the following property owner if the amount
se~ opposite his name is not accepted. And be it ~urther
resolved that the County Administrator notify said property
owner by registered mail on January 15, 1987, of the County's
intention to enter upon and take the property which is to be the
subject of said condemnation proceedings. This action is on an
emergency basis and the County intends to exercise immediate
right of entry pursuant to Section 15.1-238.1 of the Code of
Virqinia.
Albert M. Bartlett Hylton Par~ Subdivision $350
Vote: Unanimcu~
13.~.2.b. CONSIDER REQUEST TO AID L.E.R. ASSOCIATES IN ACqUIR-
ING SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS ~ ESTATE OF HATTIE K.
HANCOCK
On motion of Mr, Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator and the Right
of Way Manager to aid L. E. R. Associates in acquiring a sewer
easement a~rosa a parcel of land south of Route 360 and east of
Walmsley Boulevard, in the estate of Hattie K. ~ancock, provided
the partnership ente:s into an agreement with the County
agreeing to pay for the costs.
Vote: Unanimous
13.E.3. CONSENT ITEMS
CONTRACT FOR BUFORD ROA~/DWAYNE LANE WATF~R LINE
Mrs. Girone requested that staff eonfact Mrs- Neat to discuss
concerns relative to obtaining easements on Mrs. Nest's property
for Buford Road/Dwayne Lane water line. Mr. Welchons stated he
would contact Mrs. Neat.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approve~ and authorized the County Administrator to execute
necessary docUments for Contract Number W86-172CD for ~6" water
along Buford Road and 6" water line in Dwayne Lane to Namner Gay
and Company, Inc., in the amount of $339,882.00, which funding
for the project was scheduled in the 1986-87 budget ~nder
replace and upgrade water lines; a~d transferred f~nding in the
a~o%nt of $80,000 from 5H Bond funds to 5H-5835-500E for the
additional work and ccntingences.
Vote: Unanimous
CONTRACT FOR SEWER EXTENSION ON ALEAREE ROAD
On motion cf Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute
necessary documents ~or Contract Number S86-87C/7(8)687R ~or the
construction of sewer lines along Al~aree Road to the low
bidder, G. L. Howard, Ina., in the amount of $69,927; and
transferred fund~ from 5P-5835-900R to 5P-5835-687R in the
a~ount of $27,900.00. (It is noted that previous funding was
appropriated in the amount of $49,000.)
Vote: Unanimous
13.E.3.c. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ON REFUNDS FOR LUCKS
LANE/SMOKETREE SOUTN
On ~otion of ~r. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dedd, the Board
approved a request from Midlothian Development Corporation for
an extension o~ one (1) year of the refunds through connections
provision for Water Contract WS1-71CD, with the understanding
87-30
that no additional extensions will be granted.
~E~UEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ON REFUNDS FOR SOUTH-
RIDGE MUBDIVIGiON
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. DOdd, the Board
approved a request from Southridge Limited Partnership for an
extension of one (1) year of the referrals through connections
provision for Water Contract WS1-7CD, with the understanding
that this period will be the final extension granted.
13.E.3.e. DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG TURNER RO~D FROM MR. ~ND
M~$. PETER RITTERt JR.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute a
deed of dedication accepting, on behalf of the County, the
conveyance cf a 30' strip cf land along Turner Road (Route 650)
from Peter Ritter, Jr., and Evelyn B. Ritter. (A copy of the
plat if filed with the paper~ of thf~ Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
13.E.3.f. QUITCLAIM DEED FOR 30 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY FROM TRI-
CITIES INVESTMENT COMPANY
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the Coun=y Administrator to execute a
quitclaim deed from Tri-Cities Investment Company accepting, on
behalf of the County, a thirty foot (30') width right of way
designated as Parkers Avenue. (A copy of the plat is filed with
the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
13.E.4. REPORTS
Mr. Welchons presented the Board with a report on the developer
water and sewer contracts executed by the County Administrator.
13.F. REPORTS
Mr~ Hedrick presented the Board with status reports on the Camp
Baker Management Board Annual Report, the Schedule of
Capitalized Lease Purchases, Schedule of School Literary Loans,
Road Reserve Funds, General Fund Balance, General Fund
Contingency Acco~nt and District Road and Street Light Funds.
14. ADJO~E/~T
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by ~-~. kpplegate, the Board
adjourned at 9:50 p.m. until 9:00 a.m. on January 28, 1987.
Vote: Unanimous
Richafd'L. Hedrick
County Administrator
Harry ~niel
Chairman
87-31