12-09-1987 MinutesBOAROO~ S~PEHVISORS
December 9~ 1987
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr. Harry G. Daniel, Chairman
Mr. Jesse J. Mayas, Vice Chairman
Mr. G. H. Applegate
Mr. R. Garland Dodd
Mrs. Joan Girone
M~. Lane B. Ramsay
County Administrator
Staff in Attendance:
Ms. Martha Burton
Legislative Coord.
Clerk to the Board
Asst. Co. Admin.
Mr. William Howell,
Mr. Thomas Jacobson,
Dir. of Planning
Bu~aan Services
Mr. Richard MeElfish,
Mr. St~va Micas, CO.
Dir. of News/Info.
Col. Joseph Pittman,
Chief of Police
Co. Admin. for
Mr. David Welchons,
Dir. of Utilities
Dir. of Human
Mr. Daniel called the me,ting to order at 9:10 a.m. (EST).
1. INVOCATION
Mr. Daniel R~varand M, ~enneth Russell,
Baptist Church, who gave the invocation.
Pastor of Ettrick
2. PLEDGE OF ~/~GIANCE TO T~U~ F~AG OF 'E~ UNITED ~TAT~$ 0F
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of
America was recited.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, ~econded by Mr. Mayas, the
approved the minutes of November 25, 1987, as submitted.
Vote: Unanimous
Board
87-930
4. COUNTY ADMINIST~ATOR'S COMMKNT~
Mr. Ramsey introduced and welcomed Ms. Martha Burton, recently
employed Executive Assistant to the County Administrator, and
outlined her educational and professional experience. The
Board welcomed Ms. Burton to the County.
Mr. Ramsey announced that Mrs. KLm Beckman-Dew, reporter with
the Petersburg Progress Index, would be leaving hsr assignment
of covering Chesterfield County to relocate to Alabama.
5. BO~RD CO{~4ITTEE P~PORTS
5.A. RECOGNIZING MRS. JOAN GIRONE, M!DLOTHIAN DISTRICT SUPER-
VISOR FOR OUTSTANDING SERVICE TO CBESTERFIBLD COUNTY
The Board expressed special appreciation, on behalf
Chesterfield County, to Mrs. Joan Girone, Midlothian District
Supervisor, for her dedicated, diligent service to the County
of Chesterfield for the past twelve years and presented her
with a resolution and plaque recognizing her service and
achievements.
On motion of Mr. Applegat~, seconded by Mr. Mayes,
following resolution was adopted:
W~EREAS, Mrs. Jean Girone's term on the Board of Super-
visors will expire December 31, 1987 after twelve years of
dedicated, diligent and loyal service to Chesterfield County,
representing Midlothien District; and
WEEP~EAS, During Mrs. Girone's tenure on the Board, major
expansion of the Utilities System occurred with the
installation of hundreds of miles of water and sewer lines, the
construction of five water tanks, fourteen pumping stations,
and a new operations center; the expansion of the Swift Creek
Water Treatment Plant, the Palling Creek Wastewater Treatment
Plant and the Proctors Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant,
thereby increasing the level of treatmsnt; and e~tablished the
Industrial Waste Treatment Program and the Cross-Connection
Control Program to protect the domestic water supply and the
WHEREAS, Mrs. Girone guided the development of the
centralized computer system for the County and Schools;
supported staff in award-winning budget and financial auditing
systems; addressed the planning, financing and construction of
the County Garage, the Data Processing Center, the Human
Services Building, the Administration Building, the Jail
Addition, the Airport Bxpansion and ~angars, the Warehouse, the
Courts Building and the five Fire Stations, all of which were
initiated to improve overall operations and community services;
WHEREAS, Mrs. Girone was instrumental in the widening of
Routes 1, 10, 36, 60, 147, 360, 1-95, 1-295 and Chippenh~u
Parkway; instrumental in the construction of Fowhite
Parkway/I-288; adopted land use and transportation plans for
the Jahnke-Chippenham Development Area, Bon Air, the Northern
Planning Area, the Powhite/Route 288 Planning Area and the
Western Planning Area; facilitated an open planning process
through her regular "First Monday" citizen meetings enhancing
the understanding of planning for Chesterfield residents and
strengthening community planning endeavors for the County as a
whole; and was instrumental in the adoption of ordinance
amendments to improve developmont standards during a period of
unprecedented growth in Chesterfield County; and with her
leadership, substantial progress in regional cooperation and
regional planning was achieved in the Richmond Regional
Planning District Commission; and
87-931
WEEREAS, Mrs. Girone displayed a diversified interest in
other fields by serving en the Board of visitors for Virginia
State University, the Executive Board of the Virginia
Association of Counties, the virginia Assembly on the Future of
the Virginia Environment, the Central James River Basin
Committee, the Governor's Advisory Eoard on Aging, the Local
Government Fiscal Impact Commission and other invaluable
committees.
NOW, THEREFOR~ B~ IT R~S0LVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes Mrs. Joan Girone
for her outstanding contribution~ dedication and loyalty to
Chesterfield County while serving as a member of the Board of
Supervisors.
AND, BE IF FURTEER RESOLVED, that the Board does hereby
present a plaque inscribed as follows to Mrs. Girone:
JOAN GIRONE
BY T~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
IN RECOGNITION OF TWELVE YEARS OF SERVICE
REPRESENTING MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT ON T~E BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY FROM JANUARY 1, 1976
THROUG~ D~CRMB~R 31, 1987
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayas, Mr. Applegate and Mr. Dodd.
Abstention: Mrs. Gi~ene.
Mrs. Jean Gallup was present and introduced Ms. ~lsie ~lmore,
Mr. Edward W~lley, Jr., Ms. Mary Ann ~armon, Mrs. Virginia
Wrenn, Mr. Sol Wrenn, Ms. Lorretta ~eiser, Ms. ~ynne Cooper,
Mr. Joe Boislneau, ~rs. Carol Boisinaau, Mr. Shankat Siddigi,
Mrs. Florence Siddlql, Ms. Mildred Gallagher and Mr. Russell
Gulley who presented ~rs. Girone with a bouquet of red roses
recognizing her significant contributions and achievements
while serving as a member of the Board of Supervisors.
Mrs. Girone sxprsssed appreciation for the opportunity of
having served on the Board of Supervisors for the past twelve
years~ commended Mr. Lane Ramsay, County Administrator, Mr.
Steve Micas, County Attorney, and Ms. Joan Dolezal, Clerk to
the ~card of Supervisors, for their diligent efforts on behalf
of the Board; and recognized her constituency for their
participation aad efforts in the betterment of the County's
development.
5.B. RECOGNIZING MR. R. GARLAND DODD~ BERMUDA DISTRICT SUPER-
VISOR FOR OUTSTANDING SERVICE TO CEESTERFIELD COUNTY
M~. Daniel expressed appreciation, on behalf of Chesterfield
County, to Mr. R. Garland Dodd, Bermuda District Supervisor,
for his dedicated, diligent service to the County of
Chesterfield for the past eleven years and presented him with a
resolution and plaque racoqnizing his service and achievements.
On motion of Mr. Appleqate, Seconded by Mr. Mayer, the
following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Mr. R. Garland Dodd's term on the Board of
Supervisors will expire December 31, 1987 after eleven years of
dedicated, diligent and loyal ~ervice to Che~tarfield County,
representing Bermuda District; and
WHEREAS, During Mr. Dodd's tenure on the Board, major
expansion of the Utilities System occurred with the
installation of hundreds of miles of water and sewer lines, the
construction of five water tanks, fourteen pumping stations and
a neW operations center; the expansion of the swift Creek Water
Treatment Plant, the Falling Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
and the Proctors Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, thereby
increasing the level of treatment; and established the
Industrial Waste Treatment Program and the Cross-Connection
87-932
Control Program to psotect the domestic water supply and the
customers; and
WEEP~EA$, Mr. Dodd guided the development o~ the
centralized computer system for the County and Schools;
supported staff in award-winning budget and financial auditing
systems; addressed tl%e planning, financing and construction of
the County Garage, the Data Processing Centsr, the Human
Services Building, the Administration Building, the Jail
Addition, the Airport Expansion and Hangars, the Warehouse, ths
Courts Building and th~ five Fire Stations, all of which were
initiated to improve overall operations and community services;
and
WBEttEAS, Mr. Dodd was instrumental in the widening of
Routes 1, 10, 36, 60, 147, 360, 1-95, 1-295 and Chippenham
Parkway; was instrumsntal in the construction of Powhite
Parkway/I-288; adopted land use and transportation plans for
the Eastern Planning Area, the Central Planning Area and the
Southern Planning Area; WaS instrumental in the adoption of
ordinance amendment~ to improve development standards; and
served on the Chesterfield Planning Commission from January,
1978 to December, I979 and January, 1984 to October, 1984
during a period of unprecedented growth in Chesterfield County;
and
WHEKgAS, Mr. Dodd demonstrated an overall interest in the
affairs of his community by serving on the MetrOpolitan
Fconomic Development Council, the James River Port Study
Committee, the Crater Planning District Commission, the
Richmond Regional Planning District Commission, the Board of
Trustees for Henricus, as well as other invaluable committees.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes Mr. R. Garland
Dodd for his outstanding contribution, dedication and loyalty
to Chesterfield County while ~erving a~ a member of the Board
of Supervisors.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that th~ Board does hereby
present a plaque inscribed as follows to Sr. Dodd:
R. GAYLA-ND DODD
BY THE BOARD OB SUPERVI$0RSt COUNTY OF CNESTERFIELD
IN RECOGNITION O~ FLg~N YEARS OF S~RVTC~
R~PS~$~TING B~R~UDA DISTRICT ON THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF CKFST~RFIFLD COUNTY PROM FEBRUARY 19,
1977 THROUGH DEC,SHag 31, 1987
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Hayes, Mr. Applegate and Mrs. Girone.
kbstsntion; Mr. Dodd.
Mr, Leo Myers~ Mr. Clarence Curtis, and sr. Linwood Carroll
expressed appreciation to Mr. Dodd for his many efforts on
behalf of the citizenry of Chesterfield County and commended
him for being a "dedicated, caring, honest and responsible
leader for the people" and presented him with a gift in
appreciation.
Sr. Dodd expressed appreciation for the opportunity of having
served on the Board of Supervisors for the past eleven years;
commended the employees of Chesterfield County as being the
best anywhere; and recognized his constituency for their
participation and efforts in the betterment of the County's
development.
5.D. MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS
Mr. Daniel requested Beard authorization for the drafting of a
letter to M~s. Kerit~is thanking the School Bcard'~ for
proceeding with and forwarding to the Board information
relative to their capital improvements proqram. He stated,
87-933
however, the Board is unable to toke a position on the proposed
plan at this time and will be unable to do so until certain
issues are resolved.
On motion cf the Board, it was resolved that a letter be
drafted to the Chesterfield County School Board indicating that
the Board of Supervisors is unable to take a position on the
School Board's proposed capital improvements plan at this time
and will be unable to do so until such time as:
1. the Board meets with its bond consultants in January,
1988;
the Board meets to determine its long-term financial and
facility goals for the County and, in particular, for tho
schools;
3. the Board and the School Board meet and develop priorities
which will not exceed funding levels; and
4. adequate time hag slapsed to assess the extent of public
support for a referendum.
Vote: Unanimous
Mrs. Girone reported she would be attending the elgning of the
Chesapeake Bay Agreement in Baltimore, Maryland, being held on
December 14 and 15, 1987. She stated the Central James River
Committee, on which she serves, anticipates the appointment by
the General Assembly of a new State Board that will deal with
local land use planning and its impact on the Eay, which issue
is very important to Virginia and to the future of the
Chesapeake Bay at this point in time.
5.C. R~COGNIZING MR. HARRY G. DANIEL, DAL~ DISTRICT
VISOR~ FOR SERVICES AS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOAP~) OF SUPER-
VISORS FOR 1987
Mr. Mayas commended Mr. Daniel for a job well done as Chairman
of the Board during the past year and presented him with the
executed resolution. Mr. Daniel otated he felt the Board
accomplished much during the previous year and that the
upcoming year would be a very challenging one. He stated it
had been a pleasure serving with the present governing body,
and ha looked forward with anticipation to the upcoming year.
On motion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the following
resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, The Honorable Harry G. Daniel, Supervisor
representing Dale District, served as Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors in 1987, demonstrating leadership, responsiveness
and dedication of the highest caliber; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Daniel's dependability, reliability and
integrity have been recognized not only by tho Board, the
Administration, and the County residents, but also State
officials, through his active involvement and oo~mitment to the
Capital Region Airport Commission, tho Richmond Regional
Planning Diotrict Commission, the Metropolitan Planning
Organization, the Lake Genito Study Committee, as well as his
most recent election to the Executive Board of the Virginia
Association of Counties; and
WHEREAS, Under Mr. Daniel's Chairmanship, the County--one
of the fastest growing 10¢alities in the state and
nation--confronted challenges and demands placed upon it and
with his influence the General Assembly responded and approved
the County Charter unanimously which will streamline and make
County Government more efficient, effective and responsive to
the people.
87-934
NOW, THEREFORE SE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors does hereby recognize and applaud
the untiring efforts and commitment to excellence displayed by
its 1987 Chairman, Mr. Harry G. Daniel.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervi~or~
does h~reby present Mr. Daniel with a plaque inscribed as
follows:
HARRY G. DANIEL~ CEAIRMAN
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CHESTERFIELD COUNTY 1987
Ayes: Mr. Hayes, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Oirone.
Abstention: Mr. Daniel.
A moment of silent prayer was observed for the friends and
family members of Mr. Ralph E. Morris and Mrs. Mildred B.
Alderson, who were tragically killed in a recent automobile
accident.
6. ~QUF~TS TO POSTPONE ACTIOR~ EMERGENCY ADDITIONS OR
CH~NGRS TN T~ ORDER OF PRESENTATION
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Hayes, the Board
added Item ll.K., Consideration of Proposed 1988 Legislative
Hrogram, to be heard in sequenc~ following Item ll.G.; added an
emergency request for a raffle permit for the Bishop Ireton
Knights of Columbus to Item ll.E.2., Requests for Bingo/Raffle
Permits; and amended Item ll.H. to state, Executive Sssslon tO
Discuss the Condition, Acquisition or UEe of Real Property for
Public Purposes or the Disposition of Publicly Held Property
and Consultation with Legal Counsel pertaining to Litigation
Regarding the Buford Road Fire Station, pursuant to Sections
2.1-344 (a} (2) and (6), respsstivsly, of the code of Vir inia,
1950, as amended; and adopted the agenda, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
7. P~ESOLUTIONS ~ SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS
7.A. DR. W. CLINTON PETTUS~ C0~D4UNITY SERVICES BOARD
Mr. Masden introduced and welsomsd Dr. ~nd Mrs. Hettus who were
present. Mr. Mayes commended Dr. Pettus for his significant
contributions and distinctive service as a msmber of the
Community ServiceE Board and presented him with the executed
resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Dr. W. Clinton Pettus has been a valued member of
the Chesterfield Community Services Hoard since January, 1982;
and
WHEREAS, Dr. Pettus served as Chairman from January, 1983
through December, 1984, and Vice Chairman from January, 1985
through December, 1986; and
W~REAS, Under the guidance of Dr. Pettus, the
Chesterfield Community Services Hoard became recognized as one
of the most effective in the Commonwealth; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Pettus has also provided a major contribution
to the community through the Civic and Progressiv~ Action
Association of Matoaca Magisterial District; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Pettus was a driving force behind development
of a long-range plan for Mental Health, Mental Retardation and
Substance Abuse Services for Chesterfield County.
87-935
NOW, THEKEFORE BE IT ~SOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby e×presses its sincere
gratitude and appreciation to Dr. W. Clinton Eettus for his
significant contribution in the provision of quality mental
health, mental retardation and substance abuse services to the
citizens of Chesterfield County while a member of the
Chesterfield Community Services Board.
AND, BE IT FURTHER R~S0LVED, that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Dr. Pettus and that this resolution
be permanently recorded among the papers of the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors.
Vote: Unanimous
7.B. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS
7.B.1. MR. FRANK N. COWAN
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Mr. Frank N. Cowan wa~ appointed to the
Chesterfield County Planning Commission as the representative
from Nidlothian District On January 11, 1984; and
WHEREAS, During this time period, the County experienced
unparalleled residential, commercial and industrial growth and
change; and
WHiP, AS, With the leadership of Mr. Cowan, the County's
Land Use and Transportation Plan has been updated, substantial
a~endments have been adopted in the County's Zoning and
Subdivision Ordinances and many major development proposals
have been approved, all of which will foster a better future
for Chesterfield County; and
WBEREAS, Mr. Cowan did faithfully perform the duties and
discharge the responsibilities incumbent upon a member e~ the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Cowan's appointment to the Planning
Commission expires December 31, 1987; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Cowan's four years of service to the citizens
of Chesterfield County merits special recognition.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervi~or~ of Chesterfield County does hereby expre~ its
appreciation to Mr. Frank N. Cowan for his loyal and dedicated
service to the citizens of Chesterfield County.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED~ that a plaque inscribed as
follow~ be pre~ented to Mr. Cowan=
FRANK N, COWAN
TN APPR~CIATION E0R D~DICAT~D SERVICE
ON TH~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 11, 1984 - DECEMBER 31, 1987
Vote: Unanimous
7.B.2. M~. JOBN R. O'CONNOR
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WIffEREAS, Mr. John R. O'Connor was appointed to the
Chesterfield County Planning Commission as the representative
from Clover Hill District on January 11, 1984; and
87-936
WHEREAS, During this time period, the County experienced
unparalleled reaidential, commercial and industrial growth and
change; and
WHEREAS, With the leadership of Mr. O'Connor, the County's
Land Use and T~anspcrtation Plan has been updated, substantial
amendments have been adopted in the County's Zoning and
Subdivision Ordinances and many major development proposals
have been approved, all of which will foster a better future
for Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mr. O'Connor did faithfully perform the duties
and discharge the respensibilitiea incumbent upon a member of
the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, Mr. O'Connor's appointment to the Planning
Commission expires December 31, 1987; and
WHEREAS, Mr. O'Ccnnor's four years of service to the
citizens of Chesterfield County merits special recognition.
NOW, THEP~EFORE EE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County does hereby express its
appreciation to Mr. John R. O'Connor for his loyal and
dedicated service to the citizens of Chesterfield County.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a plaque inscribed aS
follows be presented to Mr. O'Connor:
JOHN R. O'CONNOR
IN APPRECIATION FOR DEDICATED SERVICE
ON THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 11~ 1984 - DECEMBER 31, 1987
VICE-CHAIRMAN
MAY 20, 1986 - DECEMBER 31, 1987
Vote: Unanimous
7.B.3. MR. COLON H. ROWE, JR.
Mr. Dodd introduced Mr. Colon Rowe, Jr., who was present. Mr.
Rowe expressed appreciation, on behalf of the outgoing
Commissioners, for the opportunity to have served on the
Planning Commission and conveyed Mr. Cowan's and Mr. O~Connor's
regrets for being unable to attend the meeting due to previous
commitments.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Mr. Colon B. Rowe, Jr. was appointed to the
Chesterfield County Planning Commission as the representative
from Bermuda District on May 25, 1986; and
WHEREAS, During this time period, the County experienced
unparalleled residential, commercial and industrial growth and
change; and
WHEREAS, With the leadership of Mr. Rowe, the County's
Land Use and Transportation Plan has been updated, substantial
amendments have been adopted in the County's zoning and
Subdivision Ordinances and many major development proposal~
have been approved, all of which will foster a better future
for Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Rowe did faithfully perform the duties and
discharge the responsibilities incumbent upon a me~ber of the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Rowe's appointment to the Planning Commission
expires December 31, 1987; and
87-937
WHEREAS, Mr. Rewe's one and one-half years oi service to
the citizens of Chest~rf~sld County merits special recognition.
POW, THFREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County doer hereby exprezz its
appreciation to Mr. Colon H. Rowe, Jr. for his loyal and
dedicated service to the citizens of Chesterfield County.
AND, RE IT FURTHER P~SOLVED, that a plaque inscribed as
follows be presented to Mr. Rowe:
COLON H. ROWE, JR,
IN APPRECIATION FOR DEDICATED SERVICE
ON THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTX PLANNING CQ~ISSZQN
MAY 25, 1986 - DECEMBER 31, 1987
Vote= Un&nieceS
Mr. Dodd c0mmend~d the Commissioners for their ~e~icated,
faithful service to the oitizens of Chesterfield County and
presented the executed resolutions to Mr. Rowe.
Mr. Daniel turned the gavel over to Mr. Mayes and excused
himself from the meeting.
7.C, FOUNDERS A-ND ORGANIZERS OF THE CHESTERFIELD QUARTERBACK
LEAGUE
Mr. Stith introduced and welcomed Mr. Ray Hevener, Sr.,
Willia~ "Billy" Sinclair and Mn. John "Johnny" Bosher~ founder~
of the Chesterfield Quarterback League, and Ms. Jo Elanton,
representing Mr. Jimmy Rickman, Commissioner of the Quarterback
League, who were present.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by ~r. Mayes, the following
resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, The Chesterfield Quarterback League has offered
youth football program to County residents since 1959; and
WHEREAS, Over 20,000 youth have participated in the League
since its conception; and
WHEREAS, Sinc~ its creation, the League has made a
tremendous economic impact on the Chesterfield County
community; and
WHEREAS, This year 65 tea/ns make up the organization, with
over 1,500 players; 1,000 cheerleaders and 500 parents
participating; and
WHEREAS, The followinq people have contributed over 1,000
hours of their time in setting up and running the League; and
WHEREAS, The creative management and continued growth of
the League would not have been possible without the dedication
and commitment c~ citizens such as Mr. Ray Eevener, s~., Mr.
William "Billy" Sinclair, Mr. John "Johnny" Bosher, Mr. Charlis
Willis, Mr. W. T. Henshaw, Jr., Mr. Robert Mick and Mr. Allen
NOW, THEREFORE EE IT RESOLVED, that t~e Board of
Supervisor~ doe~ hereby recognize Mr. Ray Eevener, Sr., Mr.
William "Hilly" Sinclair, Mr. John "Johnny" Bosher, Mr. Chazlie
Willis, ~r. W. T. Een~haw, Jr., Mr. Robert ~ick and Mr. Allen
Mason for their generous, personal commitment, goodwill,
concern and contribution to the Quarterback League of
Chesterfield County.
Ayes: Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent; Mr. Daniel.
87-938
Mr. Applegate commended the honorees for their generosity,
personal commitment, goodwill, concern and contributions to the
League and presented them wlt~ individual resolutions
recognizing their accomplishments.
Mr. Daniel returned to the meeting.
7.D. RECOGNIZING MR. AND MRS. JAMES E. WAYBRIGBT FOR OUTSTAND-
ING COMMUNITY SERVICE
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEI{EAS, Mr. and Mrs. James E. Waybriqht were responsible
for the arrest of two suspects and the recovery e£ $250,000 in
stolen property from the Countiss of Chesterfield and Henrico
and the Cities of ~ichmend, ~etershurg and Hopewell; and
WHEI{EAS, Mr. and M~s. Waybright hav~ exhibited an
extraordinary concern for their community; and
WHEREAS, Mr. and M~s. Waybright are actively involved in
insuring the safety of the citizens of this County by their
active and unselfish participation in the Enon Neighborhood
Watch Proqram.
NOW, TEEREFOR~ BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. and Mrs. James E.
Waybright for their outstanding concern and consideration for
fellow citizens and their property and for participation in one
of the largest stolen property recoveries in the area.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Dodd commended Mr. and Mrs. Waybright ior their outstanding
concern and consld~ration for their fellow citizens and
expressed appreciation for their active involvement and
unselfish participation in the Enon Neighborhood Watch Program.
He presented the executed resolution to Mr. Waybright, who al~o
accepted on behalf of Mrs~ Waybright who was unable to attend.
Mr. Frank Bryant and Mr. David Sauer, founding members of the
Enon Neighborhood Watch Program, were also present.
Mr. Daniel excused himself from the meeting.
7.E. DECLARING DECEMBER 13-19, 1987 AS "DRUNK AND DRUGGED
DRIVING AWAREA~S$ W~K"
Chief Pittman stated December 13 - ~9, 1987 has been designated
by the Governor as "Drunk and Drugged Driving Awareness Week",
in conjunction with the national observance authorized by
Congress. He stated there will ~e special patrols on duty
during th~ holiday season as a preventive mechanism to abate
these problems.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
adopted the following resolution was adopted:
WHERF~AS, Traffic crashes cause more violent deaths in the
United States than any other cause; and
WHEREAS, Traffic crashes also play a substantial role in
serious injuries, causing most of the new cases of epilepsy and
paraplegia in the United States each year; and
WHEREAS, Between 45 and 55 percent of fatally injured
drivers have alcohol concentrations in their blood above the
legal limit and this figure rises to 55 to 65 percent in
single-vehicl~ crashes; and
87-939
WK~R~AS, The total societal cost of drunk driving has been
estimated to be as high as $25 billion a year, which does not
include the human suffering that can never be measured; and
WHEREAS, There are increasing reports of collisions
involving drivers who have used prescriptions or illegal drugs;
WHEREAS, There has teen a groundswell of national and
local activity aimed at these problems through citizens'
groups, task forces and the Presidential Commission on Drunk
Driving; and
WHEREAS, The Christmas and New Year's holiday period is a
particularly appropriate time to focus attention on this
critical problem because more drivers are on the roads, more
social functions are attended and more traffic collisions
NOW, THEREPORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors does hereby proclaim the week Of
December 13-19, t987 as "Chesterfield County Drunk and Drugged
Driving Awareness Week" and eupports national and local
observances thereof~ and in reminding our fellow citizens that
safety belts and child safety ~eat~ are our best de£en~e
against all the hazards of the road.
Ayes: Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
Mr. Dodd stated the holiday period is a particularly
appropriate time to focus attention on this critical problem,
commended the County law enforcement for their efforts in this
endeavor and presented the executed resolution to Chief
Pittman.
8. HF~/~TNG$ OF CITIZENS ON UNSC~D~L~D MA~E~S OR CLALMS
There were no hearings of citizens on unscheduled matters or
claims.
9. DEFEIII~D ITEI~S
9.A. COND4U~ITY SERVICES BOARE
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
appointed the ~ollowing people to ~erve on the Community
Services Board, from the respective districts as indicated, and
whose terme ere effective immediately and expire December 31,
1990:
Mrs. Mary Jo Lux
Mrs. Patricia Y. Borinski
Clover Hill Magisterial District
Matoaca Magisterial District
Ayes: Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
9.B. PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
appointed Dr. Bruce R. Fleming to serve as an at-large member
on the Personnel Appeals ~oar~, whose term is effective January
1, 1988 and will e~pire December 3I, 1990.
Ayes: Mr. Mayes, ~r. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
87-940
COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS I~ESOURCES BOARD
On motion of Mr. Applegate, SecOnded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
appointed the following people to serve as at-large members on
the Community Corrections Resources Board, whose terms are
effective January 1, 1988 and will expire December 31, 1989:
Mr. Gary K. Johnson
Ms. Sandra Lee Starkey
Mx. Duane C. Watson {Alternate)
Ayes: Mr. Maye$, Mr. Appl~gate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
9.H. J~/~ES RIVER PORT STUDY TASK FORCE
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
appointed Mr. Richard F. Sale, Assistant County Administrator
for Development, as the representative for Chesterfield County
on the James River Port Study Task Force, whose term i~
effective immediately and is at the pleasure of the Board.
Ayes: Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
9.F. METROPOLITAN RICHMOND CONVENTZON AND VISITORS BU~d~AU
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
appointed Mr. Charles J. Blankenship, Director of Economic
Development, as a County alternate on the Board of Advisors of
the Metropolitan Richmond Convention and Visitors Bureau, whose
term is effective immediately and is at the pleasure of the
Board.
Ayes: Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
9.D. YOUTH SERVICES COMMISSION
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the
nominated Mrs. Angle Chastain, representing Clover
District, to serve on the Youth Services Commission,
formal appointment will be made on January 13, 1988.
Ayes: Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
Board
Hill
9.G. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
deferred consideration of the nomination for the Industrial
Development Authority until January 13, 1988, in order that the
newly elected Bermuda District Supervisor may have the
opportunity to make said appointment.
Ayes: Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. ~iron~.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
~r. Daniel returned to the meeting.
1~. P~LZC HF. AK~G$
10.A. TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE EASTERN AREA LAND USE AND
TRANSPORTATION PLAN ADDRESSING FUTURE LAND USE~ UTILITY
AND TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS IN THE RUFFIN MILL AR~A.,
BOUNDED BY INTERSTATE 95, SWIFT Ct~EEK AND ASHTON C~EK
Mr. Sale stated this da~e and time had been advertised for a
87-941
public hearing to consider an amendment to %he ~as%ern Area
Land Use and Transportation Plan addressing future land use,
utility, and transportation improvements in the Ruffin Mill
Area.
NO one came forward to speak in favor of or aqainst the
proposed amendment.
On motion of Mr, Dodd, seconded by ~r. Mayee, the Board adopted
the following re~olutien:
WHEP~AS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
adopted the Eastern Area ~snd Use and Transportation Plan as an
amendment to the Chesterfield General Plan 2000 on August 8,
1904; and
WBEREAS, Title 15.1, Chapter 11, Article 4 of the Code of
Virginia provides for the preparation and review of a
comprehensive plan for all Virginia localities end allows
preparation of the Plan in parts; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield C~unty Board of Supervisors
requested the Chesterfield County Planning Commission initiate
the Plan revision process and recommend appropriate amendments
to the Eastern Area Plan within the Ruffin Mill Road Utility
Aesee~ment Di~trict; and
WEEREA$, the Chesterfield County Planning Commission has
considered propoeed Plan alternatives and has held a public
hearing on the proposed Plan revision; and
WHEP~EAS, the Chesterfield County Planning Commission has
reoorm~ended that the Chesterfield County Board cf Supervisors
adopt staff's recommended Ruffin Mill Plan as an amendment to
%he ~astern Area Land Use and Transportation Plan, but
recommending that only the industrial property outside the
current service district be included in the industrial reserve
area.
~OW, THEP~EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that %he Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors adopts the reco~m%ended Ruffin Mill
Plan as an amendment to tho Eastern Area Land Use and
Trans~or~ation Plan to guide future devel~ment and provision
of streets and public faciliites in the a~ea.
Vote: Unanimous
10.B. TO CONSIDER TEE CONVE~ANC~ 0E ~HP~ BARC~L$ OF LAND CON-
TAILING APPROXIMATELY FIVE ACRES EACB IN T~E AIRPORT
~NDUS~RIAL PARK TO $CANCEN~R, INC.
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider the conveyance of three parcels of
land, containing approximately five (5) acres each, in the
Airport Industrial Park to SeanCenter, Inc.
No one ca~e foz%~ard to speak in ~avor of or against the
proposed conveyance.
On motion of Mr. Dcdd, se¢0nded by ~r. Maye$~ the Board
approved and authorized the Chairman of the Board and the
County Administrator to execute the appropriate agreements and
deeds conveying three parcels of land in the Airport Industrial
Park~ totalling approximately fifteen (15) acres, for $1.00 per
acre to ScanCenter, inc., with the understanding that after
completion of the initial incubator facility within one
year of the conveyance, ScanCenter, Inc. has six (6) years to
develop the second 5-acre parcel and twelve (12) years to
develop the third 5-acre parcel or, if the parcels are not
developed during the appropriate time limits, the property
reverts to the County or ScanCenter, Inc. has the option of
87-942
purchasing the parcels at a cost of $45,000 per acre plus the
cumulative consumer price index. It is noted SeanCenter, Inc.
may not convey the property to third parties during the time
that it is subjeet to the reversion. (A copy of the plat is
filed with the papers of this Board.)
11. N~W BUSINESS
ll.A. DESIGNATION OF BIRD SANCTUARIES
ll.A.1. SOM~ERVILLE GROVE SUBDIVISION
On motion Of Mrs. Qirone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEP~AS, Conservation or the saving, protecting,
preserving of our natural resources should claim the deep and
considered concern of every patriotic citizen of the County;
and
WEE~AS, Some provision must be made for wildlife if it is
to continue to exist.
NOW, TEEREFORE EE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County, Virginia, that the entire area know~ as
Somerville Grove Subdivision be designated as a Bird
Sanctuary.
That it shall be unlawful to trap, hunt, shoot or attempt
to shoot Or molest in any manner any bird or wild fowl or to
rob bird nests or wild fowl nests. Provided, however, if
starlings or similar birds are found to be congregating in such
numbers in a particular locality that they constitute a
nuisance or menace to health or property in the opinion of the
proper health authorities of Chesterfield County, then in such
event said health authorities shall mest with representatives
of the Audubon Society, Bird Club, Garden Club or Humane
gociety, or as many of said clubs as are found to exist in the
Somerville Grove subdivision, after having given at least three
days actual notice of the time and place of said meeting to the
representatives of said clubs.
If as a result of said meeting no satisfactory alternative
is found to abate such nuisance, then said birds may be
destroyed in such numbers and in such manne~ az is deemed
advisable by said health authorities under the supervision of
the Chief of Police of the County of Chesterfield.
Permission is hereby granted to the Somerville Grove CoImmunity
Association to place, subject to the regulations of the
Virginia Department of Transportation, suitable plaques at the
various entrances o£ $o~exville Grove stating that said
Somerville Grove is a Bird Sanctuary, as an appeal and reminder
to Tourist and Native alike.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.A.2. A~MBR00E LANDING SUBDIVISION
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
adopted the ~ollowing resolution:
WHEREAS, Conservation or the saving, prote0ting,
preserving of our natural resources should claim the deep and
considered concern of every patriotic citizen of the County;
and
87-943
WHEREAS, Some provision must be made for wildlife if it is
to oontlnue to exist.
NOW, TEEREFOR~ BE IT P~$0LVRD, by the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County, Virginia, that the entire area known as
Ashbrook Landing Subdivision be designated as a Bird
Sanctuary.
That it shall be unlawful to trap, hunt, shoot or attempt
to shoot or molest in any manner any bird or wild fowl or
rob bird nests or wild fowl nests. Frovidad, however,
starlings or similar bird~ are found to be congregating in such
numbers in a particular locality that they constitute a
nuisance or menace to health or prepeFty in the opinion of the
proper health authorities of Chesterfield County, then in such
event said health authorities shall meet with representatives
of the Audubon Socisty, Bird Club, Garden Club er Humane
Society, or as many of said clubs as are found to exist in the
Ashbrook Landing Subdivision, after having given at least three
days actual notice of the time and place of said meeting to th~
representatives of said clubs.
If as a result of said meeting no satisfactory alternative
is found to abate such nuisance, then said birds may be
destroyed in such numbers and in such manner as is deemed
advisable by said health authorities under the supervision of
the Chief of Police of the County of Chesterfield.
Permission is hereby granted to the Ashbrook Landing Community
Association to place, subject to the regulations of the
Virginia Department of Transportation, ~uitable plaques at the
various entrances of Ashbrcok Landing stating that said
Ashbrook Landinq is e Bird Sanctuary~ as an appeal and reminder
to Tourist and Native alike.
Vote: Unanimous
It was noted that Mr. Stith would be coordinating information
and notifying involved citizens regarding this matter.
ll.B. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER READOPTION OF
SECTIONS 8-15, 8-18 AITD 8-16.1 OF TEE COUNTY CODE,
ADJUSTING INCOM~ AND 5~ET WORTH LIMITATIONS FOE THE
ELDERLY TAX EXEMPTION PROGRAM AND TO PROVIDE FOR AUTO-
MATIC ANNUAL P~ECALCULATIONS
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board set
the date of January 13, 1988, at 7:00 p.m., for a public
hearing to con~ider readoption of Sections 8-15, 8-16 and
8~16.1 of the County Code, adjusting income and net worth
limitations for the elderly tax exemption progra~ and to
provide for automatic annual recalculations.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.C. APPROPRIATION FOR COMPLETION OF THE AUTOMATED ACCOUNTING
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board
appropriated $125,600 reserved from the 1986-87 budget (General
Fund Reserves) for the implementation of the remaining
financial system modules for ~he completion of the automated
accot~nting system.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Daniel excused himself from the meeting.
87-944
ll.D. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS
ll.D.1. SET DATES FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS TO CONSIDER CONVEY~/qCE OF
PROPERTY AT AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL PA1LK AND AUTHORIZE SALES
CONTRACTS
ll.D.l.a. SKEANS AND SKEANS
On motion of Mr. Applegate, ~¢cended by Mr. Dodd, the ~oard
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute a
contingent sales contract for the sale of 2.52 + acres, at
$45,000 per acre, in the Airport Industrial Park located along
Whitepine Road adjacent to Commonwealth Controls Corporation
and set the date of January 13, 1988, at 7:00 p.m., for a
public hearing to consider the said conveyance to Skeans and
Skeans.
Ayes: Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
ll.D.l.b. MR. PAUL PEDERSEN
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute a
contingent sales contract for the ~ale cf 7.2 + acre~, at
$45,000 per acre, in the Airport Industrial Park--fronting on
Whitepine Road across from the Landmark Company site (Lots ~45
and %46) and bounded by Starr Electric and Styles Bartley, and
set the date of January 13, 1988, at 7:00 p.m., for ~ public
hearing to con~ider the said conveyance to Mr. Paul Pedersen.
(It is noted this action supercedes a previous decision by the
Board to authorize the sale of a 2.5 ! acre parcel on Whitepine
Read, at $45,000 per acre, tO Mr. Pedersen.)
Ayes: Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
ll.D.l.c. STACRHOUSE~ INC.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute a
contingent sales contract for the sale of 2.47 + acres, at
$38,000 per acre, in the Airport Industrial Park located
between Sealeze Corporation and Strahan Ink and Lacquer
Corporation, and set the date of January 13, 1988, at 7:00
p.m., for a public hearing to con~ider the said conveyance to
Stackhouse, Inc.
Ayes: Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
ll.D.2. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR STONE PLACEMENT ON PONDOLA
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
appropriated $500 from the Matoaca District Three Cent Road
Fund for the placement of additional stone on Pondola Lane,
between Brander~ Bridge Road a~d the Chesterfield County Line,
to provide an improved riding surface.
Ayes: Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
ll.D.3. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION COST APPROVAL
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
approved the street light installation cost for the
intersection of Blithe Drive and Lively Lane, in the amount of
87-945
$493.24, which funds are to be expended from the Bermuda
District Street Sight Fund.
Ayes: Mr. Mayas, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
ll.D.4. STP~ET LIGHT REQUEST
On motion of Mr. Dodd, ~eoonded by Mr. Applegat~ the Board
approved the installation of a street light in the cul-de-sa~
of Heatherstone Drive, with funding te be expended from thc
Bermuda District Street Light Fund.
Ayes: Mr. Mayee, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
ll.D.5. STOR~ WATER MANAGEMENT AGEBBM~NT FOR VIC~ORiA~ SQUAR~
SMOPPING CENTER
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute a
Storm Water Management Agreement with the developer of
Victorian Square Shopping Center as approved by the County
Attorney's Office. (A oopy of said agreement i~ filed with the
papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
APPROPRIATION OF BEP4~UDA DIS~RIC~ ~HR~B CENT ROAD FUNDS
FOR DRAt~AG~ IMPROVEM~NTS ALONG ROUTE
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board
appropriated up to $6,5GG from the Bermuda District Three Cent
Road Funds for the purchase of materials for drainage
improvements on the westbound lane of Route 10 approximately
1,000 feet east of Bermuda Triangle Road and which crossover
culvert has resulted in an erosion problem not only to a
portion of Route 10 to the north but also to the property of
Mr. Clarence Curtis. (It is noted the installation of the
materials will be performed either by the Virginia Department
Of Transportation or the property owner.)
Ayes: Mr. Mayas, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
Mr. Daniel returned to the meeting.
ll.E. CONSENT ITEMS
ll.B.1. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Copperpenny Road and Manitoba Road in Ashley
Grove, Sections D and E, Clover Hill District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Applegate,
seconded by M~. D0dd, it is resolved that Copperpenny Road and
Manitoba Road in Ashley Grove, Sections D and E, Clover Hill
District, be and they hereby are established as public roads.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the
Secondary System, Copperpenny Road, beginning at existing
Copperpenny Road, State Route 3481, Ashley Grove, Section A,
and going southeasterly 0.05 mile to the intersection with
Manitoba Road, then continuing southeasterly 0.13 mile to end
87-946
in a cul-de-sac; and Manitoba Road, beginning at the
intersection with Copperpenny Road and going southerly 0.06
mile to tie into proposed Manitoba Road, Ashley Grove, Section
E.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance
and designated Virginia Depar~ent of Transportation drainage
These roads serve 14 lots.
And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50'
right-of-way for both of these roads.
These sections of Ashley Grov~ are recorded as follows:
Section D. Plat Book 54, Page 9, August 18, 1986.
Section E. Plat Book 55, Page 17, August 20, 1986.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.E.2. REQUESTS FOR BINGO/RAFFLE PER~4ITS
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved requests for bingo/raffle permits for the following
organizations for the calendar year 1988:
ORGANIZATIONS
Optimist Club of Bermuda
Cavalier Athletic Club
Fraternal Order of Police
Chesterfield Lodge $47
Virginia Belles Softball Club
Bingo & Raffle
Bingo
Bingo & Raffle
Bingo
And further~ the Board approved a request for a bingo permit
for the Bishop Ireton Knights of Columbus for a period of three
(3) months (January - March, 1988}, subject to staff's
recommendation that, at the time the permit expires, the
organization must reapply for a permit and indicate that it has
complied with all County regulations and State law.
Vote: ~nanimous
ll.P. UTILITIES DEEAETM~NT ITEMS
ll.P.1. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER VACATION OF A PORTION OF
WEST STREET BETWEEN PERCIVAL AND RICEMOND STREETS
M~. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance to vacate a portion of
West Street located between Percival and Richmond Streets
within the plan of the Town of Chester.
No one came forward ko speak in favor of or against the
proposal.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board adopted
the following ordinance:
A~ ORDINANCE to vacate West Street between Percival
Street and Richmond Street within Plan of the Town of
Chester, Bermuda Magisterial District, Chesterfield
County, Virginia, as shown on a plat thereof duly
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
of Chesterfield County in Deed Book 41, pages 693 and
694.
87-947
WHEREAS, Chester Land Co. and Mark L. Cammer and Jill L.
Cammer petitioned the Board cf SuRervisors of Chesterfield
County, Virginia to vacate West Street between Percival Street
and Richmond Street within Plan of the Town of Chester, Bermuda
Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia more
particularly shown on a plat of record in the Clerk's Office of
the Circuit Court of said County in Deed Book 41, pages 693 and
694, dated 1854. The portion of right of way petitioned to be
vacated is more fully described as ~ollows:
West Street between Percival Street and Richmond
Street within Plan of the Town of Chester, more
particularly shown on a plat by F. L. Hanowei1, dated
1854, and recorded in the Clerk's Office, Circuit
Court, Chesterfield County, Virginia, in Deed Book
41, pages 693 and 694.
WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section
15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by
advertising; and
WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for th~ continuance of
right of way sought to be vacated.
NOW THER=FOP~, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
That pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid right of way be and
is hereby vacated.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
accordance witch Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, and a certified copy of thi~ 0rdlnanc~ shall b~
recorded no sooner than thirty day~ hereafter in the Clerk's
Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield, Virginia pursuant to
Section 15.1-485 of the ~ode of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.14~3
is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of the
portion of the plat vacated. Thi~ Ordinance ~hall vest fee
~impte title in the portion of the right of way vacated in the
owner~ of the abutting lots free and clear of any rights of
public u~e.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall he indexed in the names
of the County of Chesterfield, as grantor, and Robert M.
Phillips, W. Courtney Wells and Barbara ~. Wells, (husband and
wife), Viola L. Britt, and Mark L. Cammer and Jill Y. Cammer,
(husband and wife), or their successors in title, as grantee.
?
Vote: Unanimous
ll.F.2. RiGMT-OF-WAY ITEMS
ll.F.2.a. CONSIDER CONDEMNATION OF SEWER EASEMENT NEAR HUGUENOT
ROAD ACROSS PROPERTY OF JOHN B. ORGAIN, III AND
NORVELL ORGAIN BUTLER
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and a~thorized the County Attorney to proceed with
condemnation of a sewer easement across the property of Mr.
John B. Orgain, III and Mrs. Norvell Orgain Butler, located
north of Huguenot Road and west of Woodmont Drive.
Vote: Unanimous
87-948
ll.F.2.b. AUTHORIZATION OF TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO DESIGN A FIVE
MILLION GALLON GROUND WATER STORAGE TANK ON HUGUENOT
SPRINGS ROAD AND ACQUIRE RIGHT-OF-WAy
Mr. Sale stated staff is requesting Board approval of a request
to transfer funds to the apprepriate account to design a five
million gallon (5mg) ground water storage tank on Huguenot
Springs Road and acquire the necessary right of way for the
tank to be completed in time to meet the 1989 demands. He
stated funds are available in the existing Capital Improvement
Budget for the Coalfield area tank and the Meadowbrook area
tank.
Mrs. Girone ~xpressed concern relative to notification of area
residents and stated she is not comfortable that the community
is sufficiently aware/knowledgeable of the propOSed project.
She stated she would like the public involved in this issue in
the form of a public hearing, public meeting, etc. She stated
the proposed site is adjacent to Bethel Church, etc., and
should be given careful consideration.
Mr. Sale indicated the public hearing process would be
conducted through the Board of Zoning Appeals as acquisition of
easements are obtained. Mrs. Girone indicated the community
should be aware that this project is under consideration before
these type technical processes begin and requested the issue be
deferred until such time as the community can be properly
notified and a public meeting held.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Appleqate, the Board
deferred consideration cf the authorization of transfer of
funds to design a five million gallon (5mg) ground water
storage tank on Huguenot Springs Road until such time as the
public process has been initiated and completed to fully inform
the citizens and the matter will then be brought back to the
Board for consideration.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.F.3. CONSENT ITEMS
ll.F.3.a. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR WATER LINE TO SERVE PHYSIC
HILLS
On motion o~ Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Aduministrator to execute any
necessary document~ awarding Contract Number W87-40C for the
construction of a water line along Winterpock, Beach and Sulk
Roads and will serve the Physic Hill Subdivision and other
propertlee, to the lowest bidder, B. Nammer and Gay Co., Inc.,
in the amount of $766,467.80. (It is noted funds for the
project are included in the FY 1987-88 Capital Improvements
Budget.)
ll.F.3.b. RIGHT-OF-WAY AG~/~EMENT WITH VIRGINIA POWER AT ETTRICK
PARK
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by M~. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute a
right-of-way agreement with Virginia Power, which easement is
needed for installation of electrical services to a new
baseball/softball field at ~ttrick Park. (It is noted funds
~or construction of the baseball/softball field were approved
in the 1985 Parks Improvement Bond, and it is anticipated the
field should be opened in Spring, 1988. A copy of said
agreement is filed with the papers of thiz Board.)
Vote; Unanimous
87-949
ll.E.8.e. AUTNORIZE DESIGN WORK FOR HIGHWAY PROJECTS ALONG
ROUTE 10 THROUGH CHESTER AND HOPKINS ROAD
On motion cf Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute any
necessary documents to authorize the design for water and ~ewer
relocation work on the Virginia Department of Transportation
projects along Route 10 through the Village of Chester and
along Hopkins Road from Meadowdale Boulevard to Beulah Road.
It is noted the cost for the engineering service~ will not
exceed $63,830 for the Route 10 project and $27,900.00 for the
~opkins Road project, and the projects' desiqn will be funded
as indicated:
Route 10 through Chester Pro3ect U87-222CD
Water: Transfer $26,760 from - 5H-5217~6C6E - {Wa%er line
adjustments -
Route 288)
to - 5H-5217-7N2M
Transfer $37,070 from - 5P-5217-700E ('87-'88 CIP -
Misc. Hwy.
Projects Fund)
to - 5P-5217-7N2M
~opkins Road Project U87-223CD
Water: Transfer $11,400 from - 5H-5217-6C6E - (Water line
adjustments -
Route 288)
to - 5H-5217-7NBM
Sewer: Transfer $16,500 from - 5P-5217-700E - ('87-'88 CIP -
Projects
Funds)
ll.E.4. REPORTE
Mr. Sale presented the Board with a report on the developer
water and sewer contracts executed by the County Administrator.
ll.G. REPORTS
Mr. Ramsey presented the Beard with a status report on the
General Fund Contingency Account, General Fund Balance, Road
Reserve ~unds, District Road and Street Light Funds, Lease
Purchases, School Literary Loans and the School Board Agenda,
as well as a Work Program for Amendment of the Northern Area
Plan.
ll.K. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED 1988 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM
After a brief discussion, it was on motion of the Board
resolved that the proposed 1988 Legislative Rrogram for
Chesterfield County be adopted, ss amended. (A copy of said
program is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
87-950
EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS THE CONDITION~ ACQUISITION,.
OR USE OF REAL PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES OR T~E DIS-
POSITION OF PUBLICLY HELD PROPERTM AND CQNSULTATION WITH
LEGAL COUNSEL PERTAINING TO LITIGATION REGARDING THE
BUPORD ROAD FIRE STATION, PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 2.1-344
(a) (2) AND (6)~ RESPECTIVE~.~..gF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA,
1950, AS AMENDED
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
went into Executive Session to discuss the condition,
acquisition or uss of real property for public purposes or the
disposition of publicly held property and consultation with
legal counsel pertaining to litigation regarding the Buford
Road Fire Station, pursuant to Sections ~.1-344 (a) (2) and
(6), respectively, of the Ced~ of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
Reconvening:
ll.I. LUNCH
The Eoard recessed to travel to the Farm HOUSe Restaurant for
lunch.
Reconvening:
ll.J. REZONING REQUESTS
87S055
In Midlothian Magisterial District, MERIDIAN NURSING CENTERS,
INC. requested withdrawal of a Conditional Use Planned
Development to permit a nursing home in a Residential (R-7)
District on a 4.5 acre parcel fronting approximately 345 feet
on the northeast line of Old Buckingham Road, approximately 530
feet northwest of Alverser Drive. Tax Map 16-8 (1) Parcels 1
and 3 {Sheet 7).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the applicants have requested withdrawal of
Case 878055.
There was no opposition present to the request for withdrawal.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
accepted withdrawal of Case 87S055.
87S077 (Amended)
In Matoaca Magisterial District, DAVID SOWERS AND R. PATRICK
BOWE requested Conditional Use to permit a landfill in an
Agricultural (A) District on a 268.6 acre parcel fronting in
two (2) places on the west line of Coalboro Road for a total of
approximately 1,850 feet beginning at a point approximately
2,650 f~t north of Winterpock Road. Tax Map 108 (1) Parcel 1
(Sheet 28).
Mr. Jacobsen ~tate~ the ~lanning Commission recommended denial
of this request because of concerns regarding the impact of
this project; staff recommended a~roval of the request based
on the fact that the Western Area Land Use and Transportation
Plan designates the request parcel and surrounding area for
agricultural/forestat use; given the limited residential
87-951
development suggested by the Plan, operation of the landfill
should net adversely affect future area development; and the
conditions recommended in the Request Analysis insure proper
operation/reclamation and will minimize the impact on existing
and future residential p~eperties in the area. He noted staff
received petitions containing approximately 598 signatures in
opposition to the proposed use.
Mr. Edward Willey, Jr., representing the applicants, presented
an overview of the p~uposed request, explaining the proposed
use and addressed neighborhood concerns relative to safety,
conditions of the roads (i.e., width, surfacing, etc.), traffic
volumes and pattern~, hours of operation, the life expectancy
of the landfill, the impact of the landf~ll on surrounding
properties and existing/future residential development,
screening, buffering, prohibition of indiscriminate dumping of
~ateriala when the landfill is not in operation, removal of
debris and dirt from Coalboro Road, the control of dust
resulting from the operation of the landfill, methods of
monitoring~inspecting operation, the need for rubble landfills
in the County, security, economic impact o~ p~oposed use ~n
value of surrounding properties, the comparability of the
proposed request to the Taylor Road Landfill request which he
indicated is in close proximity tO the subject parcel, etc.
Mr. Mayes requested clarification as to whether or not his
attendance at meetings with his consitituents, civic groups and
Mr. Willey constituted a conflict of interest regarding this
request. Mr. Micas stated it did not. Mr. Mayes stated he did
not concur that this request was comparable to the Taylor Road
Landfill request n0~ that the Department of Waste Management
had answered questions regarding health or safety as it relates
to this particular request.
Mr. Pat Bows provided the Board with information from a traffic
study, presented a video tape recording cf road/traffic
conditions from the entrance of the proposed landfill
development northwardly to the intersection of Coalboro and
Beach Roads, presented an economic impact study and exhibited
charts relative to the environmental impact of the proposed
development on area property values versus that of other area
subdivisions located within close proximity of landfills,
exhibited pictures of properties adjacent to the proposed
landfill, outlined improvements the developers have proffered
for certain portions of Coalboro Road, etc. He stated he felt
the proposed use would have little or no aesthetic impact to
the surrounding area, and there were sufficient safeguards to
assure a safe and clean landfill operation.
Mr. Bob Roop, with J. K. Timmons and Associates, displayed and
explained the structure, function, etc., of a typical cell to
be utilized wif~hin the landfill site.
Mr. Bows reviewed findings of the geotechnlcal studies
performed on the subject site and displayed graphics relative
to abandoned coalmines in the area.
Mr. Willey clarified that the applicants are requesting a
rubble landfill which is a stump dump, and stated the
dsfinition for the subject request is the same as that which
was applicable to the Taylor Road Landfill request. ~e
requested that Condition 12 on this project be changed to be
identical to Condition 3 on the Taylor Road Landfill request to
guarantee that if this project were approved it would be
restricted to accepting the s~me type material that the Taylor
Road site could accept.
Mr. Brian Bineva, representing the Winterpock Area Citizens
Association, expressed appreciation for the opportunity to
address the Board regarding this request. He recognized Mr.
Jacobsen, Mr. Peele and Mr. Bowling for their diligent efforts
relative to this case and presented the Board with petitions
87-952
from area residents in opposition to the request. Ee addressed
concerns of area reeidents relative to safety, conditions of
the roads (i.e., width, surfacing, etc.), traffic volumes and
patterns, hours of operation, the life expectancy of the
landfill, the impact of the landfill on surrounding properties
and existing/future residential development, screening,
buffering, prohibition of indiscriminate dumping of materials
when the landfill is not in operation, remOVal Of debris and
dirt from Coalboro Road, the control of dust resulting from the
operation of the landfill, methods o£ monitoring/inspecting
operation, the need for rubble landfills in the County,
security, economic impact of proposed use on value of
surrounding properties, the comparability of the proposed
request to the Taylor Road Landfill request which he indicated
is in close proximity to the subject parcel, etc. He stated
the information presented indicates the proposed use is not in
the best interest Of the health, safety and welfare of citizens
of the County and asked the Board to deny the request.
It was generally agreed to recess for five (5) minutes.
Mr. Henry Moore, Chairman of the Winterpock Area Citizens'
Association, voiced opposition to thc proposed request and
expressed concerns relative to inadequate monitoring of wells,
fire service and roads; the impact o~ noise on the neighborhood
environment; safety hazards created by overloaded, uncovered
dnmp trucks; etc.
Mr. Bob Crowell distributed material to the Hoard relative to
the coal mines located within the subject parcel, hiqhlighting
information from field survey maps, locations of potentially
dangerous mines, etc.
Mr. Dodd expressed concern that this case has become very
lengthy and requested that further comments be restricted so
that others who were in attendance and interested in other
requests would not have to endure a long delay.
Mr. Daniel stated anyone interested in this particular case
Would have the Opportunity to speak, and since there had been
no previous re~trictions established for the length of time an
individual could address an issue on zoning oases, he could not
honor Mr. Dodd's request.
Ms. Linde Adams presented a brief overview of appraisal
information relative to property values affected by the
proposed p~oject, she stated there are approximately
twenty-five families living along Coatboro Road who oppose the
request. She also submitted two letters to the Board from
residents in opposition to the request who llve adjacent to the
proposed site but could not attend the meeting.
Mr. Wayne Patterson, a resident of Coalboro Road, voiced
opposition to the request as he felt the project will disturb
the tranquility of the neighborhood. He stated his home is the
principal investment of his life, and h~ does not want a stump
dump located three-tenthe of a mile from his home.
Mr. Jerry Journigan submitted a letter to the Board from Mr.
Tom Park, a Matoaca District resident, indicting opposition to
the proposed request, stating the use "is an unfair burden on
th~ Matoaca District, but most importantly is against the
Western planning area goals and objectives". Ee further
addressed concerns relative to resurfacing/maintenance funding
and costs for repairs to roads, the impaot of dump truck
traffic on the road surfacest etc.
87-953
Mr. Bineva submitted photographs taken in July, 1987, of Taylor
Road prior to its being resurfaced.
Mr. Cashion expressed appreciation for the opportunity to
address the Board reqarding this case and expressed concerns
that the proposed site is inappropriate for the location of a
landfill as the land in the area does not readily absorb water,
adjacent well~ could become contaminated from an overflow/seep-
age of the proposed use; underground mines pre~ent unknown
safety hazards, etc.
Mr. Applegate requested the rules be suspsnded to permit
deferral of Case 87S079, COUNTRY FARMS CONVENIENCE MARTS
ASSOCIATES, as there were several people present who were
interested in this request but who could no longer he detained
due to previous commitments and requested the case be deferred.
875079
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, COUNTRY FARMS CONVENIENCE
MARTS ASSOCIATES requested rezoning from Residential (R-7) to
Office Business (O) and Convenience Business (B-i) with
Conditional Use Planned Development. A retail/office complex
is planned. This request lies on a 4.5 acre parcel fronting
approximately 266 feet on the north line of Hull Street Road,
also fronting approximately 700 feet on Pocoshock Boulevard,
and located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of
these roads. Tax Map 40-5 (1) Parcel 14 (Sheet 15).
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
snspended the rules to permit deferral of Case 87S079 until
January 27, 1988.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
deferred Case 87B079 until January 27, 1988.
Mr. Ron MoDermont, a resident of Coalboro Road~ voice
opposition to the proposed use as he felt the quality of life
would be adversely impacted by this development and the area
should remain agricultural and/or residential.
Mr. Bo~e presented a video taped discussion of the professional
findings of several firms relative to %he safety, environmental
and economic aspects of this request.
Mr. Mayes stated he felt the case had been well represented and
documented by ~oth the applicants and the opposition and
expressed appreciation for the patience of the Board and the
public regarding this case. Me stated he felt the information
p~ovided regarding the safety and environmental aspects of this
request was inadequate to support approval of the proposed use
and the economic impact on area residents would be
deterimental. He stated, although the County needs to address
the issue of solid waste disposal, he did not feel there is a
crfsis at the present time for an additional landfill. He
stated he felt the existing quality of life in this area, as
well as the ~atoaca District, should be maintained.
Mr. Mayes recommended denial of the request. Mr. Daniel
seconded the motion in order to permit discussion.
Mr. Dodd expressed concerns relative to the manner in which
this request was handled by the Planning Commission, the
lengthy discussion which transpired and the impact of such a
constituents, etc. ~e suggested that this case be deferred
until the need/i~sue for stUmp dumps could be studied and, if
87-954
necessary, a policy prepared, as the issue is not only a
~atoaca District issue but a County-wide problem.
Mr. Daniel stated past actions by the Board of Supervieore
relating to rezoningm do not reflect a signal of the Board's
attitude toward growth hut are a collective, quantitative
description of individusl land use questions decided upon
previously. Ha expressed concerns relative to the number of
illegal landfill operations, as cited during the applicant's
prementation, within the County and directed staff to initiate
appropriate action in thie matter; he stated he needed
additional information regarding the number of legal sites
within the County and the estimated useful life of these
operations; he stated he did not feel there was sufficient
information to address the envirornnental issues, etc., and if
the request were remanded for further evaluation/study, he felt
other issues should be included (i.e., covered trucks, no
clearing of land unlese ready for construction, etc.).
Mr. Appleqate expressed concesns relative to road widths, EPA
standards, measurements of well shafts, contamination of well
water, the number of borings, fire protection services, impacts
on property values, etc. He concurred with Mr. Mayes
concerning an individual's choice to live in a rural
environment and maintaining the quality of life in that area
for as long am they care to reside there; however, he stated he
felt there were too many unanswered questiene regarding this
case and felt it should be studied/evaluated further.
Mrs. Girone concurred that there were numerous unanswered
quemtion~ and that more information was needed.
Mr. Mayes stated he felt those present were entitled to a
decision on the request and called for the vote.
The Board being polled, the vets for denial was as follows:
Mr. Dodd= Nay, as he felt the request needed deferral for
further study.
Mr. Mayes: Aye.
Mrs. Girone: Aye.
Mr. Applegate: Nay, as he felt the request should be remanded
to the Planning Con~ission for further study.
Hr. Daniel: Aye.
Mr. Daniel stated the request was dsnied.
The Board requested that the County Administrator immediately
undertake a study to determine the needs for landfill
facilities, an inventory of all known stump dump and private
landfills, an estimate of the useful life of the legal stump
dumps and landfills, to recommend a policy for closing down
illegal landfills and stump dumps as indicated in the public
testimony of the applicants, and to make a policy
recommendation to the Board as early as possible for handling
this type situation in the future.
It was generally agreed to recess for two (2) minutes.
Reconvening:
87B090 (Amended)
In Bermuda Magisterial District, RICHARD M. ALLEN ~_ND LAvEP~E
C. COLE requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) and
Residential (R-7) to Residential-Towlfaouse (R-TH), Office
Business (O), and Convenience Business (B-I) with Conditional
Use Planned Development on 75.6 acres, plus proffered
87-955
conditions on a 6.2 acre tract currently ~encd Residential
(R-7). A mixed use development with residential, office, and
eon~aercial uses is planned. This request lies on a tots} of
81.8 acres fronting approximately 2,518 feet on the north line
of Iron Bridge Road, also fronting approximately 1,220 feet on
Chalkley Road, and located in the northeast quadrant of the
intersection of these roads. Tax Map 114-7 (1) Parcels 5, 11,
43, and Part of Parcel 35; Tax Map 114-11 (1) Parcels 3, 5, and
6; Tax Map 114-12 (1) Parcels 2, 5, 6, 9, 15, and 17 (Sheet
31) .
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to certain conditions. He
stated the overlay district is applicable to the entire
development; Condition ~2, as proposed by the Planning
Commission, would allow exemption to the use of public sewer on
the Agricultural (A) portion of the subject parcel because this
parcel was already permitted to be developed on septic tanks
and was only included to provide prof£ers for the neighborhood
which address minimum square footage of houses to be built on
lots; staff has concerns relative to establishment of minimum
square footage for townhouse/c0nd0mlnlum units as that
condition is unenforceable (condition tl).
When asked, Hr. Schmeltz indicated Buxton Subdivision is
currently served by septic tank/drainfield systems and there
have been no problems with those systems. He stated the
developers of the subject property plan to use public sewer for
the entire site except for the Residential (R-7) portion of the
property adjacent to Buxton Subdivision.
Mr. Alex Sadler, representing the applicants, stated the
initial rezoning request did net include the Residential (R-7]
area and it did not need to be rezoned as it already had been
approved for single septic tank/drainfield systems some time
ago and development of the property was intended to occur under
the current zoning separate from this request. He stated,
however, the neighborhood expressed concerns regarding this
matter and to address those concerns, the application was
amended to include that area to proffer lot sizes and home
sizes, etc. He stated, with respect to Condition 2, the
applicants are requesting permission to use the existing septic
tank/drainfield systems for the two houses currently located on
the subject property if the homes are converted to office use
and that septic tank/drainfield systems be permitted only until
such time as public sewer is extended to the site; deletion of
the first sentence in Condition 5~ amendment of Condition 6 to
require the installation of a solid board or masonry fence
along Area 7 and submitted a sketch to the Board for
consideration; axaendment of Condition 7 to require building and
parking setbacks of fifteen fast from buffers in Areas 7, 8, 9
but not in Area 2 as the area is too small for effective
development and additional space is needed in that area;
amendment of Condition 10 to a permit drive-in restaurant in
Areas 4, 5, and 6; deletion of Condition ll as minimum square
footages for townhonses/eendominiums are proffered as 30%-1200
square feet, 30%-1400 square feet or more, and 40%-1800 square
feet or more; a~endment of Condition 12 to permit restaurant
opening at 6:00 a.m.; and deletion of Condition 13.
Mr. Don Pospahala, representing Chester Fishing Club, briefly
explained the operation of the iishing clu~, voiced opposition
to the proposal and expressed concerns relative to the impact
of the proposed development on the insurance liability for
operation of the fishing lake as well as the quality/quantity
of water runoff from the development into the lake.
Mr. Otis Zavertniek expressed concerns relative to drainage,
plans for protecting the quality of water, diversion of sewer
and water runoff from the proposed development into the fishinq
lake, the inability of the developers to monitor the Ph/oxygen
content of runoff water; etc.
87-956
Discussion and questions ensued relative to compatibility,
drainage, erosion, protection of water quality in the adjacent
pond, landscaping, buffers, f~nces, insurance liability, plans
for treatment plant, expertise for monitoring contaminants,
diversion systems, etc.
Mr. Donnie Craft, representing the Association of
from Buxton/Lakewood Farms, voiced concerns relative to
permitting a drive-in restaurant in Areas 4, 5, 6 a~d 7; the
1150 feet is not sufficient depth from adjacent properties to
accommodate transitional use Of property; use will attrac~
undesirables in area and encourage nighttime disturbances to
the adjacent residential environment; restaurant use will emit
odors (food, garbage, etc.); size of proposed
condominiums/townhouses not compatible with square footage,
cost/value, etc., of existing residential hemes; increased
traffic volumes on Chalkley Road; visual screening/buffering
versus undisturbed screening/buffering;
Mr. Simms, a resident of Chester Bome Sites, voiced opposition
to the proposed use and its impact upon the tranquility he
currently enjoys in hie neighborhood.
Mr. Leo Myers voiced opposition to the proposed request as he
felt it will be detrimental to the neighborhood and the
operation of the fishing club.
Ms. Judy Tapp voiced opposition to the proposed development as
she felt it will have a detrimental impact upon the quality of
the neighborhood and devalue the homes. She stated area
residents do not want fast-food restaurants, condominiums,
townhouses, etc. in the area.
Mr. Ralph Jones expressed concerns relativ~ to sediment and
erOSiOn control, storm water management techniques, proper
monitoring of the quality of the water, etc. and urged the
Board to have the foresight to address quality that affects the
values in our neiqhborhoods.
Mr. Sadler assured the Board the applicants have investigated
the ra~ifications of increased insurance rates if their
development were to be b~ilt adjacent to the fishing club, that
his firm is qualified with respect to dealing with
environmental issues, and there is a mechanism within the
conditions of zoning to control the quality of watch and
protect the lake. He stated this request has been compromised
to the point that the current requests are essential to the
operation of the facility.
Mr. Dodd disclosed to the Board he had discussed this case with
the Commonwealth Attorney-Elect relative to a potential
conflict of interest as he had an interest in property to the
west and ~outh of the subject site; however, since no sewer
lines in the proposed request will serve his property, there is
no conflict of interest. He stated this case has been a
difficult and sensitive one; however, he felt the concerns of
all those involved had been addressed/resolved as much as
possible. Re expressed appreciation for the patience of his
constituents during the meeting and their involvement with Mr.
Rowe regarding this request.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved Case 87S090, ~ubject to the following conditions:
1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by Austin Brockenbrough and Associates, revised
November 2, 1987, and the Textual Statement dated November
S, 1987, revised November 17, 1987, shall be considered
the Master Plan except as modified herein. (P&CPC)
87-957
2. Public water and sewer shall be used except as follows:
a. Area i1 may be developed with septic systems.
The existing Allen and Cole residences may
initially be utilized for residential Or office
uses on the existing septic systems, sub,oct to
Health Department approval. The~e structures
shall be connected to public sewer when it is
made available to the site.
3. In conjunction with the first schematic plan review of
each tract, conceptual landscaping plans for buffer areas
shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for ap~
proval. Detailed landscaping plans for buffer areas shall
be submittsd to the Planning Department for approval
within thirty (30) days of rough clearing and grading
within each tract. (P)
4. A plan for protection and monitoring of the water quality
of the Chester Fishing Club pond, agreeable to the devel-
opers and to the chester Fishing Club, or as approved by
the Planning Department based On advise of competent
authorities shall be submitted to, and approved by, the
Planning Commission prior to any schematic plan approval.
(CPC&BS)
5. A separator/sediment trap shall be installed on the storm
sewer. If this development causes degradation of water
quality in the Chester Fishing Club pond via any contami-
nant, the developers shall provide the necessary remedy to
the extent caused by the development. (CPC)
Additional fencing shall be provided in the buffers that
shall be, at a minimum, an eight (8) foot chain-link fence
(including one (1) gate), ten (10) feet off the property
line or on the Fishing Club property; provided that an
equivalent fencing condition may be approved at the time
of schematic plan review. The fence may only be removed
by the applicant upon written notice from the Planning
Department that it has received a ssrtlfied statement from
the Chester Fishing Club, or its successor, that the fence
is no longer necessary to maintain adequate insurance
7. A building and parking setback of twenty (20) feet shall
be maintained from buffers, except in Area 9 where the
setback may be reduced to fifteen (15) feet. (BS)
8. Schematic plans shall be considered by the Planning Com-
mission at a regularly scheduled evening meeting. (CPC)
9. There shall be no gasoline sales in Area 7, (CPC)
10. A total of two (2) drive-in restaurants shall be permitted
in Areas 4, 5, and 6. (BS)
ll. Any business operated in this develepmsnt shall close no
later than 11:00 p.m., Sunday through Thursday and no
later than 12:00 midnight, Friday and Saturday. NO busi-
ness shall open before 6:00 a.m. (BS)
12. Buffers shall be as depicted on the Master Plan, except
that a mlnimnm of a one hundred (100) foot buffer shall be
provided adjacent to Parcel 38 on Tax Map 114-7 (1). This
buffer may be reduced to thirty-five (35) feet if a house
of brick construction with a minimum e£ 2,000 feet of
living area is built adjacent to Parcel 38. This buffer
shall be installed prior to any developmsnt along Chalkley
Road in Areas 1 and 3. (BS)
(Note: This condition is in addition to the Textual
87-958
13.
Statement, IX. Development standards, a. General. 1.)
Setbacks along Chalkley Road shall be based upon major
arterial requirements until such time that adjacent
property to the west is zoned and/or developed for similar
uses. A single access shall be permitted to Chalkley
Road. The northern access shall be eliminated. (BS)
14. No restaurant shall be permitted in the Allen home.
Vote: Unanimous
It was generally agreed to recess for five (5) minutes.
(BS)
Re~onvening:
Mr. Dodd requested the rules be suspended to permit a
correction to his motion regarding Condition 7 of Case 87S090,
RICHARD M. ALLEN AND LAVERNE C. COLE.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the
suspended the rules to permit a correction to Condition 7 of
Case 87S090, RICHA/~D M. ALLEN AND LAVERNE C. COLE.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
approved Case 87S09Q, subject to the following conditions:
1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by Austin Brockenbrough and Associates, revised
November 2, 1987, and thc Textual Statement dated November
5, 1987, revised November 17, 1987, shall be considered
the Master Plan except as mcdliled herein. (P&CPC)
2. Public water and sewer shall be used except as follows:
a. Area 11 may be developed with septic systems.
b. The existing Allen and Cole residences may
initially be utilized for residential or office
uses on th~ existing septic systems, subject to
Eealth Department approval. These structures
shall be connected to public sewer when it is
made available to the site.
3. In conjunction with the first schematic plan review of
each tract, conceptual landscaping plans for buffer areas
shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for ap-
proval. Detailed landscaping plans for buffer areas shall
be submitted to the Planning Department for approval
within thirty (30) days of rough clearing and grading
within each tract.
4. A plan for protection and monitoring of the water quality
of the Chester Fishing club pond, agreeable to the devel-
opers and to the Chester Fishing Club, or as approved by
the Planning Department based on advice of competent
authorities shall be submitted to, and approved by, the
Planning Commission prior to any schematic plan approval.
(CPC&~S)
5. A separator/sediment trap shall be installed on the storm
sewer. If this development causes degradation of water
quality in the Chester Fishing Club pond via any contami-
nant, the developers shall provide the necessary remedy to
the extent caused by the development. (CPC)
87-959
6. Additional fencing shall be provided in the buffers that
shall be, at a minimum, an eight (8) foot chain-link fence
(including one (1) gate), ten (10) feet off the property
line or on the Fishing Club property~ provided that an
equivalent fencing condition may be approved at the time
of schematic plan review. The fence may only be removed
by the applicant upon written notice from the Planning
Department that it has received a certified statement from
the Chester Fishing Club, or its successor, ~hat the fence
is no longer necessary to maintain adequate insurance
coverage.
7. A building and parking setback of twenty (20) feet shall
be maintained from buffers, except in Area 2 where the
setback may be reduced to fifteen (15) feet.
8. Schematic plans shall be considered by the Planning Com-
mission at a regularly scheduled eveninq meeting. (CPC)
9. There shall be no gasoline salss in Area 7. (CPC)
10. A total of two (2) drive-in restaurants shall be permitted
in A~eas 4, 5, and 6. (BS)
11. Any business operated in this development shall close no
later than 11:00 p.m., Sunday through Thursday and no
later than 12:00 midnight, Friday and Saturday. NO busi-
ness shall open before 6:00 a.m. (BS)
12. Buffers shall be as depicted on the Master Plan, except
that a minimum of a One hundred (100) foot buffer shall be
provided adjacent to Parcel 38 on Tax Map 114-7 (1). This
buffer may be reduced to thirty-five (35) feet if a house
of brick construction with a minimum of 2,000 feet of
living area is built adjacent to Parcel 38. This buffer
shall be installed prior to any development along Chalkley
Road in Areas 1 and 3. (SS)
(Mote: This condition is in addition to the Textual
Statement, IX. Development standards, a. General. 1.)
13. Setbacks along Chalkley Road shall be based upon major
arterial requirements until such time that adjacent
property to the west is zoned and/or developed for similar
uses. A single access shall be permitted to Chalkley
Road. The northern access shall be eliminated. (RS)
MO restaurant shall be permitted in th~ Allen home.
14.
87S124
In Dale Magisterial District, C.L. RUDOLPB requested rezoning
from Aqricultural (A) to Residential (R-12). A single family
residential subdivision is planned. This request lies on a
44.8 acre parcel lying approximately t83 feet off the south
line of Jessnp Road and approximately 208 feet off Zion ~ill
Church Road and southeast of the int~sectlen o£ these roads.
Tax Map 51-12 (1) Parcel 3 (Sheet 15).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission reCOmmended
approval of this request and acceptance of the applicant's
proffered conditions.
Mr. Sam Beale stated the applicant has proffered conditions and
a declaration of covenants, restrictions and conditions which
he feels are a sufficient compromise and adequately address
87-960
Mr. Harold Crowder, representing area residents, statsd ths
subject parcel of land has been vacant for approximately twenty
(20) years and adjacent property owners would prefer that the
parcel remain in its natural state. He stated, although the
proposed use is compatible, the character and size of existing
lots adjacent to the subject property are larger than those
proposed, and area residents are requesting that the developer
proffer that the lots on the east boundary of the subject site
be a minimum of 15,000 square feet in size.
Mr. Beal~ stated the proposed land use and density a~e in
conformance with the Central Area Land Use and Transportation
Plan, the applicant ha~ agreed to a proffer which addreases lot
sizes adjacent to certain parcels, and the applicant has
limited the minimum square footage of the housing. He
expressed appreciation for the cooperation of all tho~e
involved with this request. When asked, Mr. Beale indicated
public water and sewer will be used for this project.
Mr. Applegate inquired if the proposed development would impact
enrollment at Henlng Elementary and/or Meadowbrook High
Schools. Mr. Daniel indicated the proposed development will
generate additional enrollment for area schools; however, this
factor cannot be considered in the determination of approval or
disapproval of this request.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
approved Case 87S124 and accepted the following proffered
conditions;
A. A declaration of covenants, restrictions, and conditions
shall be recorded to include the following:
(1) No noxious or offensive activity shall be carried on
upon any lots, nor shall anything be done thereon
which may be or may become an annoyance or nuisance
to the neighborhood. NO animals, livestock Or
poultry of any kind shall be raised, bred Or kept on
any lot except that dogs, cats or other household
pets may be kept, provided they are not kept, bred or
maintained for coramercial purposes.
(2) {a) No dwelling shall be erscted on any lot having a
total area of finished living space, exclusive
of basements, porches, breeze-ways, garages,
tool rooms and storag~ space of less than 1,200
square feet for a one-story dwelling, 1,400
square feet for a two-story or cape cod
dwelling, and 1,600 square feet for a tri-level
dwelling. Ail residences constructed on the
lots shall have a brick veneer foundation.
(b) NO building, or other structure shall be
erected, placed, altered or permitted to remain
on any lot unless the Construction plans and
specifications, the landscaping plans and the
location of such building or other structure
have been approved in writing by an Architec-
tural Control Committee designated by Declarant
{the "Committee"). Any such structure shall be
at least equal in quality/character to those in
the existing neighborhood. If the Co~ittee
fails to approve or disapprove any such plans,
specifications and location with 30 days after
the receipt thereof, then approval shall not be
required but will be deemed to have been waived.
The Committee shall function until houses have
been constructed on each lot and sold to an
ultimate purchaser. Thereafter a new committee
shall be formed and the members selected by the
affirmative vote of 80% of the record owners of
the lots in Jes~np Meadows.
87-961
(3) Clearing or otherwise altering t~he area within the
100 year flood plain on any lot shall not be
permitted except with respect to the installation and
maintenance of utility and drainage facilities.
(4) Strip clearing of the trees from any lot shall not be
permitted.
(5) The building setback requirements for front and side
streets for Chesterfield County, Virginia shall be
observed.
(6) Declarant reserves unto itself and its successors or
as~iqns the fee in all streets and public roads and
an easement over and under each lot for drainage
purposes and for installing and maintaining necessary
utilities on each lot.
(7) NO sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public
view on any lot except (a) one professional sign of
not more than one square foot; (h) one sign of not
more than fiv~ square feet advertising the property
for sale or rent; (c) signs used by a builder to
advertise the property for sale during the
construction and sales period; (d) one sign setting
forth the name of the subdivision.
(8) No lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping
ground for rubbish. Trash, garbage or other waste
shall not be kept except in sanitary containers. All
incinerators or other equipment for the storage or
disposal of such material shall be kept in a clean
and sanitary condition.
(9) Motor vehicles which do not have a valid inspection
sticker and a license to permit the operation of such
vehicles upon the highways of the State of Virginia
shall not be permitted to remain on any lot for a
period in excess of 60 consecutive days unless such
vehicles are parked in a garage or carport.
(10) No exterior television or other antennas, parabolic
or satellite communication dishss Or any other
equipment for the purpose of receiving or sending
radio or television signals shall be permitted on any
(11) No wall, hedge, mass planting or similar obstruction
permitted to remain on any lot between the street
right-of-way line and the front line of any
writing by the Committee.
(12) These covenant~ ~hall run with the land and shall be
binding on all parties and all persons claiming under
them for a period of thirty years from the date these
covenants shall be automatically extended for succes-
sive periods of 10 years unless an instrument signed
by a majority of the then owners of the lots covered
by this Declaration has been recorded, agreeing to
change such covenants in whole or in part.
(13) Invalidation of any of these covenants by judgment or
in full force and effect.
87-962
(14)
(15)
It shall be lawful for any person, firm or other
legal entity owning any of the lets described herein
(including Declarant, its successors or assigns) to
prosecute any proceedings at law or in equity against
the person or other legal entity violating or
attempting to violate any such covenant and either to
prevent such violation or to recover damages for such
violation. Any failure on the part oi the Declarant
or any owner of such lots to do so shall not be con-
sidered as a waiver of any rights at law or in equity
that any such party may have for past or future
violations of these covenants.
Neither the Declarant, its successors or assigns, the
Committee or any of its members shall be liable to
any owner or to any other person on account of any
claim, liability, danger or expenses suffersd er
incurred or threatensd against an owner or such other
person arising out of or in any way relating to the
subject matter of the reviews, acceptances,
inspections, permissions, consents or required
approvals, whether given, granted or withheld.
Ail o~ the lots which will be adjacent to Tax Map 51-12
(1} Parcel 4, Tax Map 51-12 (1) Parcel 2, Tax Map 51-12
(1) Parcel 1, and Tax Map 51-8 (1) Parcel 9 shall not be
less ~_han 15,000 square feet in size.
No dwelling shall be erected on any lot having a total
floor area of finish living space, exclusive of basements,
porches, breeze-ways, garages, tool rooms and storage
space of less than 1,200 square feet for a one-story
dwelling, 1,400 square feet for a two-story dwelling, and
1,600 square feet for a tr,-level dwelling. All resi-
dences constructed on the lots shall have a brick veneer
foundation.
87S132
In Dale Magisterial District, COMMONWF~%LTM D~V~LOPM~T
CORPORATION requested Conditional Us~ Planned Development to
permit bulk (lot size and width) exceptions in a Residential
(R-7) District. A single family residential subdivision is
planned. This request lies On tWO (2) parcels for a total of
35 acres, fronting in two (2) places on the west line of Jessup
Road for a total of approximately 550 £¢¢t beginning at a point
approximately 100 feet north of Hallmark Drive, also located at
the w~$t~rn terminus of Brambleton Road. Tax Map 51-7 (1)
Parcel 14 (Sheet 15).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission reco~ended
approval of this request, subject to a single condition and
acceptance of a proffered condition. He stated prior to the
recordation of the rsmaining lots of Fairpines Subdivision,
tentative approval of the plat expired, and, because the
minimum requirements of the Residential (R-7) District were
amended, any new plat of Fairpines Subdivision submitted would
need to meet the current standards (minimum lot size of 9,000
square feet and lot width of seventy-five {75) feet). He
stated the developer, through the current Conditional Use
Planned Development application, is seeking to record lots
under the previous R-7 standards aad is proffering a twelve
(12) acre tract to create a neighborhood amenity, thereby
reducing the overall average density to 1.86 units/acre.
Mr. David Reddman, representing the applicant, concurred with
Mr. Jaeobs0n. When asked, he indicated public water an~ sewer
would be used for this project.
87-963
0
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
approved Case 87S132, subject to the following condition:
The proffered condition notwithstanding, the plat of
Pairpines by J.K. Timmons and Associates, P.C., granted
tentative approval by the Planning Commission on March 18,
1986, shall be considered the Master Plan. {P)
And further, the Board a~cepted the following proffered
condition:
By the date of recordation of the subdivision plan for
Fairpines, Sections 4 and 5, as set forth on the
Application for Conditional Use Planned Development, Case
NO. 87S132, the applicant or its successors agrees to
identify ~ homeowners association or other suitable entity
to hold title to former tentatively approved Fairpines,
Section 6 (beinq 12 acres more or less, fronting on Jessup
Road) to be used as natural open space and to provide
appropriate covenants limiting the use o£ such property
for such purpose.
Vote: Unanimous
87S147
In Midlothian Magisterial District, VILLAGE ASSOCIATES
requested amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development
(Case 83S142) to permit an automobile repair shop in a
Community Business (B-2) District, plus exception to the
requirement that access not be permitted within 200 feet of a
church. This request lies on a 1.0 acre parcel fronting
approximately 215 feet on the north line of Midlothian
Turnpike, approximately 140 feet east of Mount Pisgah Drive.
Tax Map 16-9 (1) Part of Parcel 11 (Sheet 7).
Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of the request, subject to certain conditions and
acceptance of proffered conditions.
Mr. ~dward Willey, Jr., representing the applicant, stated the
recommended conditions were acceptable.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
approved Case 87S147, subject to the following conditions:
1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by Freeman and Morgan Architects, dated July 28,
1987, shall be the Master Plan. (P)
(Note: Conditions of zoning for Case 83S142 prohibit the
freestanding sign depicted on the Master Plan.)
2. Between the parking area and the access road along the
northern boundary of the site, landscaping shall be
provided so as to minimize the view of parked vehisles and
service bays from the adjacent shopping center to the
north and the church property along Mount Pisgah Drive. A
detailed landscaping plan depicting this requirement shall
be submitted to the Planning Department for approval in
conjunction with site plan review. (P)
3. Landscaping shall be provided along the east and west
property boundaries of the site to minimize the view of
the service bays and parked vehicles from adjacent proper-
ty and Midlothian Turnpike. Landscaping shall consist of
a species having an initial height and density to provide
87-964
year-round screening. ~ detailed landscaping plan depict-
ing this requirement shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for approval in conjunction with site plan
review. (P)
4. In conjunction with the approval of this request, the
Planning Commission shall grant schematic plan approval of
the site design, building elevations, and landscaping
plan. (p)
(~ote: Ail previously imposed conditions of Case 83S142,
with the exception of Condition 5 (b) remain applicable.)
And fnrther, the Board accepted the following proffered
condition:
There shall be no business activity conducted on Sundays
before 1:00 p.m.
Vote: Unanimous
87S150
In Matoaca Magisterial District, EARLE SPENCER, JR. requested
Conditional Use Planned Development to permit a convenience
store with gasoline sales and bulk (setback) exceptions in an
Agricultural (A) District on a 1.7 acre parcel fronting ap-
proximately 345 feet on the northeast line of Genito Road, also
fronting approximately 450 feet on the west line of Courthouse
Road, and located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection
of these roads. Ta~ Map 63-3 (1) Parcels 13 and 50 (Sheet 21).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning C~ission rec0~ended denial
of this request because the proposed land uses do not conform
to the Northern Area Land Use and Transportation Plan which
designates the area encompassing the request parcel for medium
density residential use, approval of commercial land uses in
this area could establish a precedent for further expansion of
similar uses from Route 360 along Courthouse and Genito Roads,
south of this intersection, the Master Plan for the request
represents everdevelopment of the subjact parcel, and approval
of this request would be inconsistent with the Commission's and
Board's previous actions regarding commercial uses at the
intersection of Genito and Courthouse Roads. He stated t_he
Planning Commission received petitions favoring approval of the
subject request, and there were also residents present who
wished to speak in favor of the request.
There was no one present to speak in opposition to the request.
Mr. Dean Eawkins, representing the applicant, presented
background information regarding the proposed request and
stated the applicant feels the proposed use is appropriate for
the subject site given the similar commercial uses within close
proximity. He stated the applicant is requesting exceptions to
only the setback requirements for parking and the gasoline
canopy.
Mrs. Mildred Spencer Moseley stated there have been previous
commercial uses on the subject parcel and voiced support for
approval of her son's request.
MS. Louise Hague's daughter voiced support for the proposed
request and stated the proposed convenience store would not
adversely impact the property.
Ms. Woodcock voiced support for the proposed request as she
felt approval would be beneficial to Mrs. Hague.
When asked, Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Co~nission based
its recommendation for denial on the fact that if the request
87-965
were approved it would establish a precedent for further
expansion of similar uses from Route 360 along Courthouse and
Genito Roads such as those types of development which have
occurred along portions of Routes 360 and 60 and would make it
difficult to deny other requests for similar development in the
Further discussion ensued relative to the current, predominant
area uses, the use of public sewer, average daily traffic trips
generated by the proposed use, ingress/egress to the sit~, the
distance of entrances for the proposed development from the
existing intersection and traffic signal, construction of
additional pavement, curb, gutter, etc., to facilitate turning
movement~ along Courthouse and Genito Roads for the entire
property, setback/buffer requirements, etc.
Mr. Daniel stated, given the ~sasOns stated for the
recor~endation of denial, he could not support approval of the
~equest. Mr. Mayas expressed concern regarding notification of
adjacent property owners, other than those who ware present and
stated he could not support approval of the request as
submitted but would support a deferral in order to receive
input from other area residents.
Mr. Hawkins stated a deferral would be acceptable to the
applicant.
On motion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Dodd~ the Board
deferred consideration of Case 87S150 until January 27, 1988.
Vote: Unanimous
87S152
In Matoaca Magisterial District, BRANDERMILL INVESTMENT
ASSOCIATES requested Conditional Use to permit an outdoor
recreational facility in a Residential (R-9) District on a 7.3
acre parcel lying approximately 700 feet of~ the southwestern
terminus of Tetris Road, also lying approxL~ately 700 feet
south of Wraywood Avenue. Tax Map 132-15 (2) Garden City
Heights, Part of Lots 104 and 105 (Sheet 41).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to certain conditions.
Mr. James Peters stated the ~ecoK~ended conditions were
acceptable. When asked, he indicated public water and sewer
will be used for the project.
There was ne opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Maycs, seconded by Mr. Dedd, the Board
approved Case 87S152, subject to the following conditinns=
1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by The Planning and Design Collaborative, Incor-
porated, dated August 24, 1987, shall be oonsidered the
plan o~ development. (P)
2. Hours of operation shall be limited from 8:00 a.m. to
10:00 p.m., Sunday through Thursday; and from 8:00 a.m. to
11:00 p.m., Friday and Saturday. Parking lots shall be
barricaded with a locked gate from t0:00 p.m. to 8:00
a.m., Sunday through Thursday; and from 11:00 p.m. to 8:00
a.m., Friday and Saturday.
3. Parking shall be provided on the basis of one (1) space
for each ninety (90) square feet of combined swimming and
wading pool areas, and four (4) spaces for each tennis
court. (P)
87-966
ll.
Vote:
(Note: The Zoning Ordinance r~quir~s that all driveways
and parking areas for six (6) or more vehicles be paved.
Also, the BOCA Code requires two-way driveways to be a
minimum of twenty-four (24) feet in width unless local
agencies grant exceptions. On a routine basis, driveways
serving parking lots containing up to fifteen (15) parking
spaces to be twenty (20) feet in width are permitted; and
driveways serving parking lots of sixteen (16) to thirty
(30) parking spaces to be twenty-two (22) feet in width.)
4. There shall be no outside public address system or
speakers.
5. All outdoor lighting shall be no higher than fifteen (15)
feet and shall be designed so as not to project light into
adjacent properties. All OUtdoor lighting shall be timed
not to permit illumination after 11:00 p.m. (P)
One (1) sign, to be located at the sntranoe to the pool
complex, shall be permitted. This sign shall neither be
luminous nor illuminated, A rendering of this sign shall
be submitted to the Flanning Department for approval prior
to erection.
7. In conjunction with final site plan review, and prior to
the release of building permits, a detailed landscape plan
for the site shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for approval. This plan shall incorporate pedestrian and
bicycle path~ to provide the greatest possible safety and
convenience of access to the site from surrounding res-
idential development.
A thirty-five (35) foot building setback and buffer strip,
exclusive of easements, parking areas, and recreation
facilities shall be established and maintained along all
property lines of the site. The area within the buffer
strip shall be left in its natural state, or supplemented
with berms, planting, or ornamental fences, in accordance
with the landscape plan (see Condition ~). NO access
shall be permitted through this buffer, except for one (1)
entrance driveway and pedestrian and bicycle paths as
shall be required by the landscape plan (see Condition 7).
(P)
9. ~ransfer of ownership and maintenance responsibility for
this recreational facility to the ~omeowner's Association
shall not take place prior to the issuance of occupancy
permits for the recreational facilities, Or prior to a
bond Doing posted providing for 100% surety of the com-
pletion of all improvements to be made. (P)
10. Any fill to increase elevation on any portion of this site
must be balanced by removal of earth to maintain the
natural capacity of the 100 year floodplain. (EE)
Public water and sewer shall be used. (U)
87S153
In Matoaca Magisterial District, GEORGE B. SOWERS, JR. AND
ASSOCIATES, INCOt%PORATED requested rezoning from Agricultural
(A) to Residential (R-12). A single family residential
subdivision iE planned. This request lies on a 40.0 acre
parcel fronting approximately 1,470 feet on the southwest line
of Happy Hill Road, approximately 300 feet southeast of Tarris
Lane, also fronting 390 feet on the east line of Elm Street,
across from Sycamore Street. Tax Map 132-16 (4) Forest
Heights, Lot 25 and Tax Map 133-13 (2) Forest Heights, Lots 21,
22, 23, and 24 (Sheet 41).
87-967
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recemmended
approval of this request, subject to a single condition.
Mr. John Dollings, representing the applicant, stated the
recommended conditions were acceptable. When asked, he
indicated public water and sewer will be used.
·here was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Hayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Beard
approved Case 875153, subject to the following condition:
A fifty (50) foot building setback and buffer strip,
exclusive of easements, shall be established and
maintained along Happy Hill Road. Prior to recordation of
subdivision plats, the developer shall flag the buffer for
inspection by the Planning Department. The area within
the buffer shall be planted, or left in its natural state
if there is sufficient vegetation to provide adequate
screening. If sufficient vegetation does not exist, a
landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for approval and a bond shall be posted to
cover the cost of implementing the plan, prior to
recordation of subdivision plats. No access shall be
permitted through this buffer. This building setback and
buffer strip shall be noted on final check and record
plats. The Planning Commission may modify this condition,
and provide for access, at ths time of tentative
subdivision r~view. (P&T)
Vote: Unanimous
87S159
In Midlothian Magisterial District, THE ASHMONT COMPANY
requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-15).
A single family residential subdivision is planned. This
request lies on a 14.5 acre parcel lying approximately 300 feet
off the north line of Smoketree Drive, measured from a point
across from Coralberry Drive, also lying at the eastern
terminus of Old Lewiston Road. Tax Map 27-5 {1) Parcel 8
(Sheet 8).
Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Ccma~isslon recommended
approval of this request.
Hr. Lennie Lewis, representing the applicant, stated the
recommendation was acceptable.
Mr. Brad Bammer~ representing the residents of Ashley Woods
Subdivision~ stated area residents prefer that the developer
preserve the natural drainage to the maximum extent and that
there be no stub road connection to Smoketree Drive.
Mrs. Girone Submitted letters from the Smoket~ee Civic
Association s~pporting no stub road connection from the
proposed development to Smoketree Drive.
On motion o~ Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved Case 87S159.
Vote: Unanimous
11.~.5. D/WiENDMENT OF PREVIOUS BOARD ACTION TO AUTHORIZ~ ADV~R-
TISING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR AN ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOP-
M~NT DISTRICT IN THE RUFFIN MILL AREA
It Was generally agreed to suspend the rules to permit
amendment of a previous Board action to authorize advertising
87-968
for a public hearing for an assessment and development distr±ct
in the Ruffin Mill area.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
suspended the rules to permit amendment of a previous Board
action to authorize advertising for a public hearing for an
assessment and development district in the Ruffin Mill area.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Apptegate, the Board
approved and authorized amendment of a previous Board action to
authorize advertising for the January 27, 1988, public hearing
to permit the advertisement for both an a~sessment and
development district in the Ruffin Mill area.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.L. AMENDMENT OF 1987 ~OLIDAY SCHEDULE
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seoonded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
suspended its rules to permit an amendment to the 1987 County
Holiday schedule.
Vote: Unanimous
On metion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized amendment of the 1987 County Holiday
schedule to include a half-day holiday for New Year's Eve,
Decenfoer 31, 1987.
Vote: Unanimous
12. ~
On motion of Mr. Applegats, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
adjourned at 9:00 p.m. (EST) until 4:00 p.m. (~$T) on January
13, 1988.
Vote: Unanimous
L~ne B. Ramsey ~ n
County Administrator
87-969