The URL can be used to link to this page

1956-01-10 Packet11� VIRGINIA: At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, held at the Courthouse on January 10, 19560 at 10:00 a.m. Present: fr. Irvin G. Horner Mr. H. T.Goyne Mr. R.J. Britton Mr. Stanley R. Hague, Jr. Dr, Robt, 0. Gill Mr. Marshall F. Driskill This day Mr. Irvin Horner welcomes Mr. Marshall Driskill to the Board of Supervisors* Mr. Driskill expressed his pleasure in becoming a part of the government of Chesterfield County. Mr.Driskill introduces the Rev. Eugene Woolridge, Pastor of Stratford Hills Baptist Church, who gives the ingocation. This being the first meeting of the new term, the Executive Secretary asked for nominations for Chairman of the Board of Supervisors. On motion of Dr.Gill, seconded by Mr.Britton. it is resolved that Mro Horner be and he hereby is elected Chairman of this Board. The Chairman welcomes Mr. Ernest Gates as Commonwealth's Attorney for Chestc_f: County attending his first Board meeting in this capacity. On motion of Mr. Goyne, seconded by Mr. Britton, it is resolved that this Board _authorize the Treasurer of the County to invest $5000000 from the General County Fund at the best possible rate of interest on a short term basis. This day Dr. A.G; Macklin, appeared before the Board seeking the extension of maintenance on Oakland Avenue in 11:est Chesterfield Heights* On motion of Dr.Gill, seconded by Mr.Goyne, it is resolved that this Board rescind its resolution of October 11, 1955, concerning the improvement of this street. Upon further consideration and on motion of Dr.Gill# seconded by Mr .Brit ton, it is resolved that this Board request the Highway Department to improve Oakland kvenue approximately 270 feet north of its northern end at a cost not to exceed $267.509 the cost of which is to be borne by the 3¢ Road Fund of the County. Write usual resolutions on Yeardley Road in Westover Farms, Melbourne Drive, Glyndon Lane and Woodbury Lane in Granite Hills. n —2— Mao. Coyne requested Mr. Kellam to improve a driveway helonging to Mr. X. H. Brooks, on the western end of Swineford Road. Oo Kellam informed the Board that 0120,795.00 was unprogrammed Federal Aid lklads to be available through Tune 30, 1958, Upon consideration whereof and on motion of Mr.Britton, seconded by Mr. Driskill, _t is resolved that this Board request the Highway Department to program the u:memcumbered balance of Chesterfield's Matching Fund to be spent on the improve- ment; of Cherokee Road (Rt. 704) at its intersection with Rt.679, westwardly to Bosher °s Dam and the improvement of Granite Rd. (Rt. 683) fromits intersection with Rt.679 to Rt,, 147. This day Mr. Fred Thompson came before the Board citing the fact that Manchester School and the new School on Whitehead Road would be requiring extensive sewerage systems and asking the Board of Supervisors what procedure the School Board should consider in its planning for these utilities. It was generally agreed School Board keep the Board informed as to its progress on the planning oa these utilities, but not to count on a County sewer system in the immediate suture. Whereas, a portion of Ste Rt. 10 not improved leading from Richmond to Chesterfield Courthouse carries a considerable volume of traffic, and is in need of great improvement , and Whereas;, the State Department of Highways has appropriated $55s,000.00 for the improvement of a section of this road, Now, Therefore, Be it Resolved on motion 6f Mr. Hague, seconded by Dr. Gill, that this Board request the State Highway Department to improve St. Route #10, from the southern end of recent improvement southwardly to Chesterfield Courthoilm- a distance of approximately 4-miles. This day* Mr. Belville came before the Board in behalf of Mr. J.Louis Reynolds, presenting a game claim on a calf one clay old which was killed by dogs, Upon consideration whereof and on motion of Mr.Goyne, seconded by Mr.Driskill, it is resolved that the Executive Secretary get the assessment figures and present same at the next regular ne eting, and ask the Game Warden to be present at that timo, This day the Chairman recognizes Mr. Horace Mann, a long time resident of Hatoaca Village,, This day Mr.Stuart Schmidt came before the Board seeking rezoning from Residential-2 to Genera-1. Business on the following described parcel of land: In Manchester Magisterial District, a parcel of land fronting 200 feet on Blithewood Drive and extending approximately 180 feet westwardly to Hathaway Road and a parcel of land fronting Blithewood Drive 215 feet and extending eastwardly 165 feet, both of said parcels lying immediately north o" Sequoyah Road and being better known as Lots 1 and 2. B1ockA, and 1 and 2 Block F inthe Plan of Kenmore Ridge! n -3- M Mr- Schmidt states that he wishes to reduce the amount of zoning request to 65 feet north of Sequoyah Road, running fram Hathaway eastwardly 400 feet to his property line. Mr, Schmidt states there should be a ratio of 3 to 1 in the parking space in relation to actual floor space in the shopping area. Petition signed by some 15 citizens living within 500 feet of this W . Marvin Cole, Attorney for citizens opposing this request presents a notarized property, and presents another petition signed by many of the citizens in the surrounding territory, along with a delegation of some 41 persons, all opposing the requested rezoning, Mr. Robert Raab, speaking for the rezoning stated that the parking lot was most necessary. On motion of Mr. Britton, seconded by Mr.Goyne, it is resolved that action on this matter be postponed until January 24, 1956, at 8:00 peme This day Mr. John tester came before the Board requesting the rezoning from Agriculture to General Business on the following described parcel of land: In Midlothian Magisterial District, a pzrcel of land fronting 730 feet on Rte60 and extending northwardly 300 feet, said parcel bei of 1500 feet west of Buford Road, Came also W- Gayle who states he does not oppose the rezoning of land for business but does not favor the monstruction of a service station on this Property, Mr, Foster states that the owner of this land had no specific•.,. Plans for its development, Upon consideration whereof and on motion of Mr.Driskill, sedonded by Mre Goyne, it is resolved that the application for rezoning the afo redeseribed property from Agriculture to General Busiress be and it hereby is denied. It is here noted that four supervisors vote "Aye". AISN 820 feet front ng on the above proposed business zone and, extending northwardly 3000 feet, the same being the tentative subdivision of Bon Ali, Hills, which is proposed to be rezoned from Agriculture to Residential-?. Upon consideration whereof and on motion of MroDriski L:n seconded by Mr,Goyr.s, it is resolved that the aforedescribed parcel of land be and it hereby is rezoned from Agricu"Ukure to Residential-2. This day Mr, Geo. McKesson, came before the Board requesting a Use Permit to operate a dance hall on the following described parcel of land: In Manchester Wgisterial District; a parcel of land fronting 500 feet on the private road of George McKesson and extending westwardly 200 feet, said parcel being 700 feet south of Rt,60, There appearing no opposition to this request,, upon consideration whereof and on motion of W.-Britton, seconded by Mr, Driskill, it is resolved that a Use Permit to operate a dense hall on the aforedescribe parcel of land be and it hereby is granted, n ".6 M This day Mrs. D.P.0)ffield came before the Board requesting the rezoning from Agriculture to General Business of the following described parcel of land: In Manchester Magisterial District, a parcel of land fronting on Broad Rock Road and 62 feet and extending westwardly 675 feet, said parcel being 370 feet northwardly on Walmsley Boytl.everd. And there appearing no opposition to this request and on motion of vr,Brit ton, seconded by Mr. Hague, it is resolved that the aforedeoribed parcel of land be and it hereby is rezoned to General Business. This day the American Telephone and Telegraph Cohpany appeared before the Board requesting a Use Permit to operate a TV Tower on the following described parcel of land: In Matoaca Magisterial District, a parcel of land containing 8—acres fronting 600 feet on the Branders Bridge Road and extending 600 feet no rthwazdl y along theSeaboard Airline RR, said parcel being west of and adjacent to the Seaboard �yirline RR. Whereas, no opposition appears to this request, upon consideration whereof and on motion of Dr,,Gill, seconded by Mr. Hague, it is resolved that the request4d for a Use Permit to operate a T2 Tower on the aforeddecribe parcel of land, be, and the same is hereby grantede This day Mr. Louis Longest appeared before the Board requesting a variance in the CountyTs building restrictions to allow him to locate a building 15 feet from his front property line on Rt. 10, said building to be located Just east of the rear of the Chester Bank, and Whereas, it appears that the Highway Department has purchased more Chad than is necessary at th-s point, and Whereas,, it appears that the strict complieice with the set beck code mould cause extreme hardship, Nowr Therefore, Be it Resolved, on motion of * .Goyne, seconded by Mr.Brit ton, that this Board giant a variance of its building restrictions to allow the co.1struction of a:� office building not less than 15 feet from the property line. This day Mr.XLbert Mumma presented a letter fm the Board of Supervisors, Proposing to give to the Bounty the Grove Place water system, presently owned and operated by Mr, Mumma, and agrees to maintain the system for any reasonable length of time to enaKe the County to construct an 8" line along Rta #]A, aad citing the fact that ;300.00 is available, and within two years, which is the estimated time necessary for completition of an 8" line along Rt. #10, $384^00 will be guaranteed inrevenuse Chereupon Mro Mumma states he is willing to pay the difference in the cost of a 611 lino from Rt. 10 and the '684.00 and will guarantee also to maintain the system until said line is installed Whereupon it was agreed that the Commonwealth's i,ttorney would prepare a contract to presence to this Board at its nsxt meeting. This dal the Count;r Eagineer presented a contract for the installation of approximatel,r 500 feet of 4" line west of Hey Road on old Broad Rock Road, stating the fact that the proposed plan calls for an 8" line on said road. Several plans were discussed for handling this project but it was generally agreed that no action be taken to approve this contract at this time. The County Engineer presented a contract for the its tallation of approximately 200 feet of 2" line in the Johnson Farms Subdivision., Upon consideration whereof and on motion of Mr.Britton, seconded by Dr., Gill, it is resolved that said contract be and the same is hereby approved. ,nd be it further resolved that the Chairman and Executive Secretary be authorized to sign said contract. On motion of Mr Goynes seconded by Mr.Britton,. it is resolved that the Chairman appoint a Committee to study the organization of the Water Department, and to recommend a plan for the setting up a Department of Public Utilities. Whereupon, Mr, Horner appoints appoints the Commonwealth's Attorney, the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the Emutive Secretary as this Committee. On motion of Mr. Driskill, seconded by Mr.Goyne, it is resolved that the County Engineer prepare specifications for an emergency repair truck and to obtain bids for said truck. It is here noted that DreGill vot4s "No:' It was generally agreed that no formal approval of the authorization to obtain detailed plans and specifications for the construction of water improvement until such time as the recent bond vote is certified, would Too.► made, however, the County E-ngineer is instructed to proceed as fast as possible on such work as is feasible to improve the filter pldat, to raise the dam, to locate the shop for the Water Department, and such other work as is necessary. On motion of Mr.Goyne, seconded by Mr.Brittoa, it is resolved that the insurance for the Volunteer Firemen of the County be awarded to the firm of Goddin, Goodridge and Robertson, to be p1s ced with the Firements Fund Indemnity Company*, at a price not to exceed 0585.94, which premium allows for the following coverage: Accidental Death Benefit $3000.00 Loss of two members,(hands,feet or eyes) 39000.00 Loss of hand or foot 4 500.00 L^3s of sight of one eye 4000e00 Accident medical reimbursement Benofit, Maxim= 19000,00 Weekly accident Indemnity Fayable from first day for as long as five years 25.00 On motion of DreGill, seconded by W. Driskill, it is resolved that the County Engineer be requested to contact the Consulting Engineering firm of Wiley and Wilson to get a proposal for engineering services connected with the Ettrick sewerage connection with Peterskurge This day Mr. Tordan and others appeared before the Board requesting some understanding concerning the Manchester Memorial Building which is at present being erected on Bryce's Zane, and it was generally agreed that the building should hero separate heating systems and separate electrical systems so that the Cotmty could pay its share for heating the Fire Department only. M -6- On motion of Mr. Britton, secord ed by Mr.Driskill, it is resolved that the Executive Secretary be and he hereby is authorized to purchase a siren for the Manchester Fire Department, which siren would be somewhat similar to that recently purchased for the Dale Volunteer Fire Department. On motion of Mr.Goyne, seconded b y Mr. Britton, be it resolved: that the members of the General Assembly of Virginia representing Chesterfield County are respectfully requested to introduce and work for the passage in the 1956 Session of the General Assembly the following bills in addition to other bills heretofore approved: 1. 44thority to employ a general registrar and allow the retbntion of local registrars. 2. Make water charges a lien on the real estate served. 3. Amend Section 58-266.37 of the Code, to include Chesterfield so that Chesterfield will have the same powers as Richmond and Henrico to impose certain license taxes. 4. .Authority to create Department of license inspection. 5. .Amend revenue dater Act of 1946 to allow refunding of outstanding bonded indebtedness. 6. Change the maximum and minimum limits of the salary of the Commonwealth's Attorney to $6000.00 minimum and $9500*00 maximum. This day the report from the Compensation Board as to the 3ixpenses and salaries in theSherifffs Office came before the Board; upon consideration whereof and on motion of Dr.Gill, seconded by Mr.Driskill, it is resolved that this Board doth object to the salary fixed for Gilliam H. Cogbill,Deputy Sheriff, by the Compensation Board tentatively, and request a hearing on such objections. Be it further resolved, that this Board doth designate Dr.Grll and Mr.Driskill to serve as additional members of the Compensation Board to hew this mactter. Be it further resolved, that this Board doth feel that the salary requested for Gilliam H.Cogbill, to be fair compensation to be paid said Deputy. This day the Executive Sedretary advised the Board that bids were being received for the County's fleet insurance policy and that the Nation-wide Company had given a month 's binder to allow this bid to be received. This day the Executive Secretary advised the Board that letters from the Hon. Minetree Folkes, Tr., Hon. Lloyd C.Bird and the Hon. Edward M.Hudgins, had been received, allof which letters cited and expressed cooperation with the Hoard's request for legislation. This day the reports from tye State Compensation Board on the salaftes of the Commissioner of Revenue, Sheriff, Treasurer and Commonwealth's Attorney, had been received, and it w.s ordered that these be received and fildd with the exception of the Sheriff's report. -7r The Chairman noted the fact that the Planning Commissionts . representattv9s and members should be selected at its next meeting. On motion of'Mr.Goyne, seconded by Dr.Gill, it is resolved that the minutes of October 6, 11, 13, and 27th, November 9, 22, and 29th, and December 6, 13 and. 21st, be and they hereby are approved. On motion, the meeting is adjourned until January 17, 19569 at 8:00 p.m. Virginia Otatt gCoutge 3peterdurg Virginia OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR December 13, 1955 DIVISION OF BASIC EDUCATION The Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia Gentlemen: The resolution passed by the Board of Supervisors on October 11, 1955 re- lative to the improvement of Oakland Avenue in West Chesterfield Heights is appreciated by the property owners involved and we herewith express our appreciation for the consideration given. While the resolution did not clearly set forth this point, we recall that the improvement considered would (1) carry the improvement work up to in- cluding a point at which water would be carried through a pipe under the curve beyond the point of current State maintenance. It is our understanding that this improvement will insure maintenance by the State Department of highways from now on of the improved section and a number of us will cooperate to pay one half of the $265.00 needed. Gentlemen, time and circusmstances are of such that we take this action although we hope you will be kind enough to reconsider the payment plan when additional information is given you. Please,therefore, authorize the completion of this improvement and we respectfully request your per- mission to confer with you later about the matter. We personally assure the payment of the amount requested of us $1.37.50 within the sixty (60) days or upon call thereafter. Respectfully yours, A. G. MR4Lin AGMs M In WEST CHESTERFIELD HEIGHTS OAKLAND AVENUE January 9, 1956 TO s Members of the Board of Supervisors Ches erfield County, Virginia FROM: 4LG7�4macpinjp Chairii7mi The Impr ment Committee West Chesterfirld Heights REF.: 1. A petition to review the decision on providing additional improvement at Oakland Avenue and Plumtree Street and transfer into the State road system. 2. A petition that a clearance line be established for the rear of Lots in Block I sub -division In reference to the road improvement the correspondence here available shows that: 1. On April 26, 1949 we petitioned the Board of Supervisors for road improvements, sewer and water on the road which extends from Dupuy Road to Piedmount Avenue and water and sewage facilities on Oakland Avenue per se. 2. The estimated length of the road was 4000 feet. 3. At a meeting of the Board of Supervisors between May, 1949 and November 1949 it was determined that the cost of the road improvement would be about $1000*00 and that the County would pay half while the property owners would pay half. 4. After December 3, I discussed in a letter to Mr. Kellam, The Resident Engineer., whether or not part or all of the road was involved, and whether or not hard surface would be involved. I was advised that hard surface would be a matter of time, after the road had been taken into the State road system. 5. Gravel and drainage were provided throughout the length of the road, the cost was $900.00 and Mr. Burnett, writing for the Board of Supervisors, requested $450.00 as the property owners' part of the cost. LM In Page 2 Members of the Board of Supervisors January 9, 1956 6. That certain high State and County officials were kind enough to indicate that the petitioners were worthy of all consideration the County could give them. ?. The Chairman of the Improvement Committee was a member of the State Supervisory staff in the Department of Education. It was orally noted that the Chairman was a member of the Circuit Court Grand Jury, while most of the other property owners were on the staff at Virginia State College. It is worthy noting that one of the property owners not on the staff at Virginia State College is one of the most solid citizens in Chesterfield County in terms of taxes and decorum. 8. I served as a agent for the County without - collected the donations from the tax payers and submitted a check for $450.00 which check was recognized in a letter from Mr. Burnett on June 13, 1950. 9. To insure water in the area three families combined to lend the County $1000.00 in 19491 and nine property owners paid $50#00 for water connections to their land and shortly after payment of $450.00 on June 13, 1950 the entire road between North Avenue and Piedmount Avenue extension and Dupuy Road was graveled and drained by the State Highway Department and the County, with the County assuming $450.00 of the 2¢ road fund. 10. That the road was then said to meet the requirement for acceptance into the State Secondary Road System. However, in 1952 the road had not been kept up or taken into the State system, and the Board of Supervisors discovered it was a matter of over -sight and misunderstanding. When Mr. Kellam and I presented conflicting evidence, a special committee was appointed to visit the area. That committee consisted of Mr. Burnett, Dr. Gill and Mr. Kellam. They discovered that the road had been graveled and hard surfaced and that it should be kept up and recommended for inclusion into the State Road System. However, since some property owners had not built their homes in the area, this group agreed to recommend for immediate acceptance into the road system a portion of the road up to a point beyond my residence since that was the furthermost residence on the road at that time. I understood that the principle was then laid to extend the road as far as property owners built. Two members of the Armed Forces have now constructed homes slightly beyond a point of maintenance, and in pursuit of principles the fact that n n Page 3 Members of the Board of supervisors January 9, 1956 the tax payers having paid 50% of the initial cost, we petition, therefore, that: 1. The Board authorize the improvement of the additional section of the road as here discussed 2. The Board review its decision to charge the property owners another one-half cost of the road. M WEST CHESTERFIELD HEIGHTS OAKLAND AVENUE January 91 1956 TO : Members of the Board of Supervisors Che erfield County, Virginia i FROM: Major Richard gTiEes Cap n a t Halsey . G. MaclUin., Chairman The Improvement Committee West Chesterfield Heights REF.: Petition No. 2 As a result of recent re -surveying of Block I a discrepancy in reference to the property line bordering Roosevelt Avenue has been noticed. The original survey differs from the line established by the Watkins? survey and I understand another surveyor. The recent pur- chasers of the property and the undersign are eager to establish a line so that the lots may be arranged for personal use without misgivings. We are requesting the Board of Supervisors to arrange for a definite establishment of the property line here referred to . 14 PETITION TO BOARD CF SUPERV IS OR.S CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Ve, the undersigned, property area have been adc_sed that appl.icationhas been emade rs ntothetheSouthampton Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County to,ree7.assify residential property known as Lots 1 and 2, Block A and 1 and 2 Block F in the Plan of Kenmore 'ridge to the General Business classification. We believe that the encroachment into presently established residential areas by reclassifying this area for General Business will be against our best interests and the best interests of the County as a whole and will depreciate all properties, both developed and undeveloped. It is our firm belief that this reclassification is unnecessary and that the property presently zoned for busine6s adjacent to this area is adequate to serve the business reeds of this community for the future. We, therefore, respectfully ,irge the Board to deny the for changing the classification of this property. for PROPERTY CV`/NER iC 11 12Z-)y�'F'� ,L�J Z 13 15��n i City of Richmond State of Virginia This day personally appeared before me a Notary P'Jblic in. and for the City and each acknowledged their signatures affixed to this -petition before me in my City af'ores Subscribed and sworn -to -this day of 1956. Notary Public Nay Commission expires A IN PETITION TO BOARD OF SUPERVIS OF3 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Ise, the undersigned, property owners in the Southampton area, have been advised that appl.-ication has been made tothe Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County to reclassify residential property known as Lots 1 and 2, Block A and 1 and 2 Block F in the Plan of Kenmore Udge to the General Business classification. We believe that the enc- oachment into presently established residential areas by reclassifying this area for General Business will be against our best inte-^ests and the best interests of the County as a whole and will depreciate all properties, i;oth developed and undeveloped. It is our firm belief that this reclassification is unnecessary and that the property presently zoned for busir_,:ss adjacent to this area is adequate to serve the business needs of this community for the future. We, therefore, respectfully arge the Board to deny the petition for changing the classification of this property. PR OPERTY OVINER ADDRESS e....{- 4. 1_ �10� �� City of Richmond State of Virginia This day personally appeared before me a Nptary P.iblic in and for the City cf Richmond, State of Virginia, 3 7 --and each aclrnowledg6d their ir signatures affixed to this petition before me in -my City of ors said Subo-drIUM' and sworn tOthis _day ' o 1956. N ot ar'blic Wq Commission expires 7- PETITION TO BOARD OF SUPERVT.SOF0 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Vle, the undersigned, property owners in the Southampton area, have been advised that app"'.ication has been made tote Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County to reclassify residential property known as Lots 1 and 2, Block A and 1 and 2 Block F in the Plan of Kenmore ridge to the General Business classification. We believe that the encroachment into presently established residential areas by reclassifying this area for General Business will be against our best interests and the best interests of the County as a whole and will depreciate all properties, both developed and undeveloped. It is our firm belief that this reclassification is unnecessary and that the property presently zoned for business adjacent to this area is adequate to serve the business needs of this community for the future. We, therefore, respectfully urge the Board to deny the petition for changing the classification of this property. 9 10— 11 12 14 „- 15 City of Richmond State of Virginia This day personally appeared before me a Notary P iblic in and for the City of Richmond, State of Virginia; 1. 9. . 10-1 4 , 12._ k 5. �� 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. and each ackr.owledged"their signatures affixed to this petition before me in my City afore -Said." Subscribed and sworn to this day of S A r`; `� 1956. _.._ ... - Notary Public Ply Commission expires 1 -�- k PETITION TO BOARD OF SUPERV73OF:3 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Vle, the undersigned, property owners in the Southampton area, have been advised that app7.Ication has been made tothe Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County to reclassify residential property known as Lots 1 and 2, Block A and 1 and 2 Block F in the Plan of Kenmore 'Ridge to the General Business classification. We believe that the enc-oachment into presently established residential areas by reclassifying this area for General Business will be against our best interests and the best interests of the County as a whole and will depreciate all properties, i;oth developed and undeveloped. It is our firm belief that this reclassification is unnecessary and that the property presently zoned for business adjacent to this area is adequate to serve the business needs of this community for the future. We, therefore, respectfully urge the Board to deny the petition for changing the classification of this property. PPnPRPTV riUNRR 14 — 15 ADDRESS *-405-10ess Q.v fJa P-3 City of Richmond State of Virginia This day personally appeared before me�/(,tL�Crs a Notary PAb.lic in and for the City c,f Richmond, State of Virginia, 1 • `� ,A 2, 9i 10 3 11. 8. "' slid each acknowledged their signatures affixed to this petition before me in Cityaforesaid. .. .;..... . .... .__ ..:...._ -Subscribed ' and sworn to this day of. cr1956. Notary P blic Rey Commission expires i i�• LINDSEY & S-4BEPPARD, INC. �...2ealtoac.... R E N T N - • A L E O - I N• U R A N C E - L O A N B CLINTON M. iMEPPARD, PREE. M. W. •NEPPARD. •EORETARY Mr. W. S. Watkins 2008 B lithwood Drive i�ichmond, lfirp;inia Dear Sir. 11TM h MULL STREETS - RICMMOND. VA. PHONE • 2 - 4 E D ! January 10, 1956 In connection with ;your reque.:t that I make an inspection of your property at the above address and the further request that I ascertain, if possible whether there would be arry change in the value of your property provided lots 1 and 2 in B lock A and 1 and 2 in B lock F in the Plan of Kenmore Ridge be reclassified from residential property to general business. It is my opinion that if the classification of lots is changed, it would be detrimental to th. residential properties on B lithw:,od Drive as I feel that the property would not be as desirable for residential purposes as it is at present. It is ray opinion that there is sufficient property zoned for business in the immediate neighborhood, as at present the shopping center takes in approxivately six acres and has only been partially developed. Further property on the south line of !3iver Road across from the shopping center same belonging to Manchester Lodge ,' 14, A F and A M is zoned for business and has not been developed. Also on the south line of Granite Road in the Gr--;vel Kills Section, there is a plot of land zoned for business, which has not been developed. Also on the west line of Hathaway Road there is a large area zoned for business, which has not been developed. It is a further question in my mind that the proposed change can be made as per the sketch dated January 4, 1956 by J. H. Tiimaons, Engineer vi thout the consent of all of the property owners in the Plan of Kenmore Ridage as I think this proposed change would come under the Plat Act. Yours very truly, CHS3h a DIAL 2.5801 MEMBER RICHMOND REAL ESTATE EXCHANGE VIRGINIA REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATION NATIONAL ASSN. REAL ESTATE BOARDS RICHMOND CHAMBER OR COMMERCE 1/7 R E A L T O R S SALES -LOANS - KEN T S - INSURANCE 401 EA//,,S�T, FRANKLIN STREET lJl iciciu»ronw� , Y.�i�uac 'fit-kr'9"t P 4 Mr. Melvin W. Burnett Chesterfield Court House Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: December 9, 1955 As per our conversation on the telephone yesterday, the purpose of this letter is to request the abandonment and relocation of Sequoyah Road, and also request the re -zoning of Lots 1 and 2, Block A, and Lots 1 and 2, Block F, in the plan of Kenmore Ridge, from residential to business. I am sure you are familiar with these lots which are located behind the Stratford Hills Shopping Center. You will find enclosed check for $10.00 to cover cost of advertis- ing in connection with this rezoning. Thanking you for your consideration in this matter, I am Sincerely yours, Stuart G. Schmidt "WE BELIEVE IN RICHMOND" 0 hA `� ' ' I� r-0ocy 1'-0FioaSas o � A A cti � c � O � k► ob t p r\ 1) W of • err" `w� T K, 140TI0 That the 3oard of :supervisors of Chesterfield County ;-,ill on Decemiaer 13, 1955, at 2:00 p.me at its meeting room at Chesterfield Courthouse, lirginia, take under consideration the r-zoning and/or gr.onting of n Use remit on the follourinf; described parcels of land in the County of Chesterfield: In Dale Lagisterial District, an irref ular parcel of land fronting 3000 feet on the •'elmont Toed end extending eestk>.ardly 1600 feet more or less, said parcel beinf; 2600 fe-?t south of Fellin _• ro�reek which is proposed to be r zoned from ;�griculture to :esIdent 131-2 on an application ofr.J.R.Ro�:ke. q,. In Bermudu .iagisterial i'istrict, a parcel of land fronting 800 feet on the James liver nand extending westwa.:dly 1000 feet said parcel oeing the property of 2ranois Sloan and includes the i:iount Blanco Subdivision, rhich is proposed to be rezoned from .,grieulture to Residential-1 on an npplieation of ter. 1FTnneis Sloan. 8: In .:idlothian Lafristerial A.;trict, 3 parcel of land fronting 730 feet on :t.60 and extending, northwardly 300 feat, said parcel being 1600 feet west of Buford Toad, which is proposed to be rezoned from., riculture to rener,:1 3usines' on % :application of I:r. Lind Lwirence. aso, 820 feet fronting on the above proposed business zone and extending northcvordly 3000 feet, the same ueine the tentative bubdivision of Son ;Jr dills, which is proposed to be rezoned from Zrioulture to residential-2 on an application of i.ar.. Lind Lw;rence. 9;:. In ::ianches`or 1"neisterial District, a parcel of limd fronting 90 feet. on Lerman f3chool Toad •)nd extending northeastv-ard]y 130 feet said parcel beinG 100 feet soutaaest of 14OW011 load, hick is propose' to be r=.zoned from Residential-2 to General Business on ^n 3 •plic3t;on of = r. Raymond Scott. -11 persons favoring or opposim , the grantisf• of these rec,uests are invited to Appear at the time and place herein st.t d. f. ..Burnett, &ecutive -ecre t ory Board of tUpervisora of Chesterfield County, Virginia. %1✓ REZONING In 1. S. G. Schmidt - 708 Custis Road, Rich.mnnd, Virginia 311-274 Land Co. of Virginia 401 E. Franklin S reet, Richmond, Virginia Lot 3 3 Chrokee Hi11s 4 5 Frederic Realty Corn. 3A-270 Allen G. Fleischer, - Central National. Bank, Richmond, Virginia 6 3�-2.75 Christine T. Schultz, - 1129 Winona Avenue, S.W. , Roanake, Va. 2. Mr. 'George McNAsson �eo �l/ j , ��....., c+�, Ile. 14t.-64 JMrs. J. C. Mckesson, Rt. 11, -Richmond, Virginia 46 4ki11iam Johnson, Rt. 11, Box 78, Richmond, Virginia 12 *ram. 1). Morrison, Rt. 11, Richmond, Virginia 1.3 IVefnon E. Harris, 1811 Ingram Avenue, Richmond, Virginia 14 J Colonial Farms Inc. , 2016 Sledd Street, Richmond, Virginia. 63 J P. L. Davis, Rt. 1.1., Box 1'?l, Richmond, Virginia 45 V Edward C. Petple, 3308 Lexley Road, Richmond, Virginia 3 G�� I• kilo - Ile" 3. `_Mr. Delmar P. Coffield, 6419 Broad Rock "oad, Richmond, i.rifginia 15-32-33 Delmar P. Coffield -1 Mrs. Mabel V. Devine, 6421 Broad Rock Road, Richmond, Virginia 34 Raymond 11. Taylor , 715 Hull Street, Richmond, Virginia ( Chesterfield Lodge No. 161 AF & AM) and J. Acca Witt 28. Al R4ander r�7i_11 er Rt. 11, BoX440, Richmond, Virginia W. B. Goode 6418 Proad Rock Road, Richmond, Virginia. 4. ji.meri_can Telephone and Telegraph Comnary _ 5 0 n M r. 4-1 1e ✓ ,�..r K ale, 311 Atlantic Land a, Imp. Company, Wilmington, N?. C. 32✓ Mrs. Rozell Lan!fstPr , Rt. 1, Colonial T_-1,ights, Virginia 34VMargaret R. Sample, 102 Prander's Bf=id-A Road, Colonial Heights, Va. 35 n it 11 11 11 it M n T AK . NO T I C E That the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County will on January 10, 1956v at 2:00 p.me at its meeting roam at Chesterfield Courthouse, Virginia, take under consideration the rezoning and/or granting of a Use Permit on the following described properties: le In Manchester Magisterial Distriot, a parcel of land fronting 200 feet on Blithewood Drive and extending approximately 180 feet westwardly to Hathaway Road and a parcel of land fronting Blithewood Drive 215 feet and extending eastwardly 165 feet, both of said parcels lying immediately north of Sequoyah Road and being better known as Lots 1 and 2, Block A. and 1 and 2 Block F in the Plan of Kenmore Rdd got which parcels of land are proposed to be rezoned from Residential-2 to General Busi.re as on an appli cation of Ur. S.G. Schmidt. 2. In Manchester Magisterial District, a parcel of land fronting 500 feet on the private road of George McKesson and extending westwardly 200 feet � said parcel being 700 feet south of Rt.60, on which a Use Permit to operate a dance hall is requested by Mr.George McKesson. 3. In Manchester Magisterial District, a parcel of land fronting on Broad Rook Road 62 feet and extending westwardly 675 feet, said parcel being 370 feet northwardly on Walmeley Boulevard, which is proposed to be rezoned from Agriculture to General Business on an application of Mr.D.P.Coffield. 49 In Matoace Magisterial District, a parcel of land containing 8-acres fronting 600 feet on the Branders Bridge Road and extending 600 feet northwardly along the Seaboard Airline RR., said parcel being weeb of and adjacent to the Seaboard Airline RR. on which a Use Permit is requested to operate a TV Tower by the American Telephone and Telegraph Company. All persons favoring or opposing the granting of these requests are invited to appear at the time and place herein stated, Z. M. WQBurnstt, Executive Secretary Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. RICHMOND NEWSPAPEr AINC. ' Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES -DISPATCH r i. Taf . ch�sker 2�ag�terial nis- Richmond, U1 a , t 1ST. land frontln 2tlp f on . znAtd 180 et' ex_ tending, roxisuately 1$0 feet west- 1{' 11 0 thaivay oad and afar- celV111d 9.",ing B1lthewooa Legal Notice r This is to certify that the attached---------------------_ _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ _ nrl�e 1$,0. feet and extending eastwardly h65 'feet, both of said parcels lying iann, iately north of Sequoyah Road . was published in The Richmond Times -Dispatch, a newspaper published in and g better Dawn as rote 1 and 2, Block A, 1 and and 2 Block F : the City of Richmond, State of Virginia. Sa the pan of Kenmore Ridge, which pare�elsf land are Propoaed to be trot» Residential 2 to Gen. December 28, 1955 January 4� 1256------------------- k3twlness q� ait application of � $bhmidt, �--_ ---------------- � et " an biro went December 28 1955 d��ini rdesaa p g qnd extending wc700 The first insertion being given_ __ _ - __ __ _ __ --------------------- 200 Peet said parget being 7pp feet, S aaui of Route 60, on which a Use Fersait'.to operate a dance 'hall is requested. AQz Geo[ge,.ibicKesson. --___� Business Manager. J. VAUGHAN GARY 3z) DISTRICT, VIRGINIA PAUL SAUNIER, JR. N4 SECRETARY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Conarea of tbt anito otatto Ysoufse of Repreontatibts; wobington, ;9. C. December 8, lvr. 1,ielvin TBurnett, Countv jn,-ineer and Ejxecuti-.,re Secretary, Chest fie ld, Virginia. Dear 7,--r. Burnett: I recentliT received, from the Hoi-.s-Mr7 and Home -Finance A -envy, some information sheets concerni -n(- "Advances for -Ublic ";'Orks -.Plannincr" It occurred to me that they mL-ht not have - reached you through the a&iinistrative channels * " the G07 , -ernment, and t_114:�rfore I an enclosing* con,-%r frith tl!is letter. I an sure it i-,,ill be of inter-st to vou, if you 1,ave not already received it. _.'ith kindest ,)ersonal re�,-ards and best T am s' e s Sincerely yours,.,' i F � l � - f • : fp �.: „ f. � .-yam.-t_ ,.L.,,c._-F' f- , I In 1.810 Mr. Robert C. Lloyd 1306 drill Street Richmond, Virginia Dear Sirs COIMMONWRAI.TH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT of HIGHWAYS This to to advise that I ins Subdivision and the following roasts meet of Highways Specifications: Melbourne Drives frota tilyndQn Lanes, from M u Woodberry Lanes f This information will of Supervisors for their acts Part of the Second CPK :laps 00 ►Mr. H. fit. Burnett 0- Box 8887 ichmond,, Virginia Pnuary K, 1956 iitrs Granite Mile the roads iA Granite Mille �W,n bui o Virginia Depart-r on Lane to rwy Lane o WexfW Lune id to tAe Chesterfield County Poard which a ll include theca as Yours very truly,, C. P. Kellam s, Resident Engineer REs Bra nits, Hills �)ubd vision M PETITION TO BOARD OF S UPERV I:S OF3 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA We, the undersigned, property owners in the Southampton area, have been advised that application has been made to -be Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County to reclassify residential property known as Lois 1 and 2, Block A and 1 and 2 Block F in the Plan of Kenmore 'Zidge to the General Business classification. We believe that the encroachment into presently established residential areas by reclassifying this area for General Business will be against our best inte=^ests and the best interests of the County as a whole and will depreciate all properties, uoth developed and undeveloped. It is our firm belief that this reclassification is unnecessary and that the property presently zoned for business adjacent to this area is adequate to serve the business needs of this community for the future. We, therefore, respectfully urge the Board to deny the petition for changing the classification of this property. PR OPERTY (MINER m ti /'. )27 Gig �-- 14 PETITION TO BOARD OF SUPERVISCE3 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Z'e, the undersigned, property owners in the Southampton area, have been adv_sed that application has been made tottie Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County to reclassify residential property known as Lots 1 and 2, Block A and l and 2 Block F in the Plan of Kenmore Ridge to the General Business classification. We believe that the enc_oachment into presently established residential areas by reclassifying this area for General Business will be against our best interests and the best interests of the County as a whole and will depreciate all properties, both developed and undeveloped. It is our firm belief that this reclassification is unnecessary and that the property presently zoned for busiieos adjacent to this area is adequate to serve the buginess needs of this community for the future. We, therefore, respectfully urge the Board to deny the petition for changing the classification of this property. 11 '12 13 At ----�. 14 15 City of Richmond State of Virginia -� This day personally appeared before me a Notary Public in and for the City of Richmond,, State of Virginia, 2 je'5;�"-dZ�'i ��'Gc"'`� to . - 0 4. 12. . 5 6.� 140 __ .. .-....:. 7 35 . -- and each -acknowledged their signatures affixed to. this petition before me in mar• Gity aforesaid. _ ... _ .. _...... - - -- - - -Subscribed and sworn to this -day of /l> 1956. Notary Public ,.... _.... My Commission expires %y �.. :.......................... PETITION TO BOARD OF SUPERV IS CES CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA We, the undersigned, property owners in the Southampton area, have been adv_sed that app;.lcation has been made to -be Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County to reclassify residential property known as Lots 1 and 2, Block A and 1 and 2 Block F in the Plan of Kenmore 'Ridge to the General Business classification. We believe that the encroachment into presently established residential areas by reclassifying this area for General Business will be against our best interests and the best interests of the County as a whole and will deprecate all properties, i,,oth developed and undeveloped. It is our firm belief that this reclassification is unnecessary and that the property presently zoned for busine-os adjacent to this area is adequate to serve the business reeds of this community for the future. We, therefore, respectfully urge the Board to deny the petition for changing the classification of this property. PROPERTY CAER, r 1 r PETITION TO BOARD OF SUPERV IS CRa CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VTRGINIA V e, the undersigned, property owners in the Southampton area, have been advised that application has been made tothe Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County to reclassify residential property known as Lots 1 and 2, Block A and 1 and 2 Block F in the Plan of Kenmore Ridge to the General Business classification. Vie believe that the encroachment into presently established residential areas by reclassifying this area for General Business Will be against our best interests and the best interests of the County as a whole and will depreciate all properties, 'both developed and undeveloped. It is our firm belief that this reclassification is unnecessary and that the property presently zoned for busin--o3 adjacent to this area is adequate to serve the business needs of this community for the future. We, therefore, respectfully urge the Board to deny the petition for changing the classification of this property. PROPERTY OVINER FA 5 ---------------- 7 8 9 10 11 '2 13 14 15 I City of Richmond State of Virgitia This day personally appeared before me a Notary.. Fiblic in and for the City cf Richmond, State of Virginia, 5. 13. ,and. each- acknowledge-& •the'Tr" signatures affixed to this petition before me in my -City -aforesaid Subscribed -and'-ftarn to this day of 1956. Notary Public Njy Commission expires l /" PETITION TO BOARD OF SUPERV TS OR.S CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGIN IA 0 We, the undersigned, property owners in the Southampton area, have been adv_sed that-avplication has been made to'be Board of Supervisors ofChesterfield County to reclassify residential property known as Lots 1 and 2, Block A and 1 and 2 Block F . in , the Plan of Kenmore Ridge to the General Business classification. We believe that the enc-oachme�nt• into presently established residential areas by reclfssifying this area for General Business will be against our best interests and the best interests of the County as a whole and will deprec1ate all.pr.gperties, both -developed and undeveloped. It is our firm belief that this reclassification is unnecessary and that the property presently zoned for busin�,Zs adjacent to this area is adequate to serve the business needs.of-44is community for the future. We, therefore, respectfully urge the Board to deny the petition for changing the classification of this. prol.erty�-" PROPERTY OVINER i RM i- -i —ir/i ASDRESS City of Richmond State of Virginia This day personally appeared before me k."3 ""� 9 . � / a Notary Fiblic in and for the City c,f Richmond, State, of Virginia, 9. IL ,Qr 20� 3 • Via, :%.sa✓�,� . ,� 11. 13. .�.. 8. L r and each acic ovtledged'heir signatures affixed to this petition before me in my City -aforesaid". 'Subscribed" grid ' sworn uo this day of R ^� �7 N 1956. _.. -~ ..r ....AA _.... Notary Public My Commission expiresIj LaVDSEY & STiEpp Nc* Realkol-A.... R i N T p • A L i p t M 0WR A' -N' O i - L D A N p awfwpN •NiPPARO, Pwtp. stowtT^wr ISTN A NULL pTRtiTp - RICHMONO, vA. / PNp.Nt •i•�i�i i 10* 'IM ,# ii* d. Wotldxw 11thwoo Dr " a ioha+ond,t Vir Dow Sir# in somostion odth your uea* t t I now an jooptoition or you p at the" Stdroso ftd fish MOW riquoA *,oi I asoort"A'o it possols vbotbor %Wwo round ' b*,Ow amwao I* tba v*uo of Your p ' pad" U$$ :L 024 p in l lj*j "d " M,74 .! " B 3** 1' IS tho rim of Xommare, ,dd+t "bo roo l"si f " *on ro AwMdi4 p3r"*rty U 1 is jd IW repro+" *M## if tt OU444",blonot lots is *Wood, It wou3A het detriamt4 to tba moldsN*14 PV*V0r tl*$ Am Blithwood D rivo " 2 601 that Wit' V"U not btr , ► doss i u r3� purposoo us its to • ProaM��t �► It to or tb#r# Is #pMo%sat proprlW zo"Ij for lruoieroo In .o riot not 6 " 'b � � �` tsb*s In Spjpromiam*ly Itz "r*s uid 04 pwt &V �`o rty on s 1i40 of ll ear r h1rr 'Opp roar b to to �+t ►��' Lo4p # 14#, A. T ad A it"Mod ftr 10"tallass t mA bom d#^oit AU* an the south UrA of Or t tt►o 2 U 00 ar I favo, Hills $"t t t,* � Is of i� for ;lou oo fit.lot + bd ��d# ' '#A t "",U i,irto ►;UUMW i dq�z:id toy' budmoss# rtd oik Me t boot do tia rted. It is o furVwr ,%a*ja"bilo is jW alvA that lU pra td ow bo #�► r ^ �► did d +s by J* 'It. , r: �L t�t'� the obsoat of to of bbo 1* 'thr pig or ►s I % tmt pro s erg )A saw wvAlor Vo ?W Ae t. ovorytm' F M m LA P- V lot n T '— ��hGr Z.- pN O 9\ uj n �A W 0 �w 4 Z to r Richmond, Virginia December 12, 1955 Zoning Board County of Chestefi.eld Chesterfield., Virginia Gentlemen: ,,e would like -to have the following piece of property rezoned from residential to General Business: lst- That certain parcel of land containing o.21 of an acre, more or less, describedas follows: Begin- ning on the Nest side of Lroad Rocr: .'tor--).d at a st ixe at the ,outhern line of Eagles land; thence running in a southernly direction along the West site of said hroe d. Rock. Road a distance of b1.87 feet to a corner; thence exten(Yi ng bac' westwardly from said front within parallel lines, the northern line being the southern line of the land of spid Eagles a distance of 150 feet, being 61.87 feet wide in the rear. 2nd- That certain parcel of laird containing 0.73 of an acre, more or less, described as follows: Cor!,mencing 150 feet from the Sout�: east (erroneously called South- west in former deeds) corner of the h;ag:les lard on the ,lest side of ro �.ditock Road; thence extending in a southernly direction on a lneparallel with said Broad rtocx Ro -.d bl.87 feet to a corner; thence in a line parallel with r,agles land 518.8 fet:°t to a corner on the Gregory land; thence North 4 degrees last 01.87 feet to a corner on said Eagles land; thence in an easternly direction along the southern line of said Ea.gh s land 524 feet to the point of 'keginning. _rnclosed olease find chec:, in the ai ount of Teri Dollars (� 10.00) to cover cost of rezoning. Y,:urs truly, P. S. House number of this property is: b419 Broad Rocl Road Richmond 24, Va. '' z T Uof`f, �,ii �.. fe / S-- 3 1-1 1 3 n n AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY LONG LINES DEPARTMENT 1609 G STREET N. W. EASTERN AREA WASHINGTON 6. D. C. NATIONAL 4.9900 CHARLES H. TESKEY ASSISTANT AREA ATTORNEY December 20, 1955 Mr. M. W. Burnett Executive Secretary Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Sir: American Telephone and Telegraph Company hereby makes an appli- cation for a use permit to construct a steel tower 300 feet in height on a tract of land now under contract to purchase from Orrin J. and Mary R. Eckler, Route #1, Colonial Heights, Va. The above tract of land is approximately 6001 x 6001 and it ad- joins the northeasterly edsTe of Branders Bridge Road and the northwesterly edge of the Seaboard Railroad. The proposed tower will be guyed on the property and these guys will be similar to those used on other radio stations throughout the country and they have proven satisfactory from a safety stand- point. The purpose of erecting the proposed tower is to furnish television service to Station-WXEX, Petersburg, Va. In addition to the tower, we propose to erect a small concrete block building approximately 131 x 151 which will be used to house the necessary equipment. We enclose our check in the amount of $10.00 which we understand is the fee in connection with such applications. Yours very truly, Assistant Area Attorney CHT/dh �L,m/d z� w LM 15 A 1. IVA T F— C �,',4 CA11,14 L 1 C— 14 T 5 5c c 1'. 6 6- ACV$ /* e-, Ad, Al. T M In TAKE NOT ICE That the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County will on January 10, 19569 at 2:00 p.me at its me sting room at Chesterfield Courthouse, Virginia, take under consideration the rezoning and/or granting of a Use Permit on the following described properties: 1. In Manchester Magisterial District, a parcel of land fronting 200 feet on Blithewood Drive and extending approximately 180 feet westwardly to Hathaway Road and a parcel of land fronting Blithewood Drive 215 feet and extending eastwardly 165 feet, both of said parcels lying immediately north of Sequoyah Road and being better known as Lots 1 and 2, Block A. and 1 and 2 Block F in the Plan of Kenmore RU ge, which parcels of land are proposed to be rezoned from Residential-2 to General Business on an application of Mr, S.G. Schmidt• 2• In Manchester Magisterial District, a parcel of land fronting 500 feet on the private road of George McKesson and extending westwardly 200 feet, said parcel being 700 feet south of Rt.609 on which a Use Permit to operate a dance hall is requested by Mr.George McKesson. 3. In Manchester Magisterial District, a parcel of land fronting on Broad Rook Road 62 feet and extending westwardly 675 feet, said parcel being 370 feet northwardly on Walmgley Boulevard, which is proposed to be rezoned from Agriculture to General Business on an application of Mr.D.P.Coffield. Q• In Matoaca Magisterial District, a parcel of land containing 8-sores fronting 600 feet on the Branders Bridge Road and extending 600 feet northwardly along the Seaboard Airline RR., said parcel being west of and adjacent to the Seaboard Airline RR* on which a Use Permit is requested to operate a TV Tower by the American Telephone and Telegraph Company. All persons favoring or opposing the granting of these requests are invited to apps or at the time and place herein stated, M. W.Burnett, Executive Secretary. Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. M n January 10; 1956 M. W. Burnett Executive Secretary Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: The developed area of Grove Place Subdivision is presently being serviced by a water system owned and operated by me. Due to recent action by the Federal Housing Administration, residences built in the area and serviced by said system are no longer eligble for FHA or VA loans. This situation may be corrected if the County will assume responsibility for the system. For such responsibility, I am prepared to relinquish my rights in the well and equipment, including lines, along with revenue collected for services rendered eight patrons; and agree to maintain the system for such reasonable time as may be set by you. Three -hundred dollars($300) is available as a deposit on the cost to be incurred in connecting my system with the County's main, when it is laid along Hundred Road, as described in the proposed expansion program. Your favorable consideration in this matter will be appreciated. Sincerely yours, `74'UlAt4tA Elbert L. Mumma Building Inspector ELM: jej m m Alo v. AG, nG� Gdr.�G✓ CtT Dh, sI4.-af..J/%rC � eav-ft474 . QQepor� � cr»src �u� �✓G�� . /� iie%w is •a v.��'��`�e. ��C✓ �KGf 0 i.l /X� .i. r ii/�IL•iv/��%/f lti� f"3_ ON I�//�Ct �j a/ ; /�K s�-..�-?�+� /f9b �/G.f� //�i: Bra �fe k .S`�ta►..L .,f^ j %1/ e e� a� / i✓p ��/� ,�� j'Cots u�/� oh(i ei1- %eGo rsr�lesit�a�iaK �. w.�JE'4', S4-/p Cre„14 n -- 7s e-4ck v -17" /y'ta�.�`G.�... fl�/Ke-�, �N ve,�-�o►-�1 C t E/-k T v f>r., A r— Q /•. f�r� I n c Q c Yeti✓ ettJ Bel `40 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO INSURE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Benefits desired to cover bodily injuries sustained while member is engaged in performing the duties of a volunteer fireman: Accidental Death Benefit $3,000.00 Loss of two members (hands, feet or eyes) $3,000.00 Loss of hand or foot $1,500,00 Loss of sight of one eye $1,000.00 Accident Medical Reimbursement Benefit, Maximum $1,000.00 Monthly Accident Indemnity, payable from first day for as long as five years $100.00 Insurance is to cover total of fire departments. The number of individual locations is . There is a total of pieces of equipment. The total number of members of the combined fire departments is Annual Premium 0? Coverage to be effective January 13 1956. Name of Company submitting proposal NPR A tv dod w k1 m - W AN —,ivAI- / p /� a D- r7�;o- — y �' , '7 = A y_ y%Ai lv J 19 2- (,l,f. - • wX� (�td.�wl�s �. �. sss.gy sy�s� OrAtjc h — of . 9a aPrc) rs. b4f 3 C / 0 ( SO .D [ T d_ _ 1 d % • S _ !� a b,eel L/�_• 7S •S�aa W /�. C'Q JJ Al •• (r t Al p r A ._ _ . �e_ ems_- e.a ys __ r 5 - /►'� x a //J ( f � %r!! �� / � .. r_� ��%� �— 4 -1 . M I INSURANCE 0. I NSV � 3 G R O U P S aGNDED IB M Fireman's Fund Insurance Company Home Fire & Marine Insurance Company Fireman's Fund Indemnity Company National Surety Corporation RICHMOND SERVICE OFFICE - 401 SOUTHERN STATES BUILDING P. O. Box 136 - Telephone 7-2938 December 29, 1955 RICHMOND, VA. Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Board of Supervisors Chesterfield Court House, Virginia Volunteer Fire Department Accident Coverage Dear Mr. Burnett: In accordance with the bid submitted this day by Goddin, Goodridge & Robertson, Agents, we are holding coverage bound in the name of The Volunteer Fire Department of Chesterfield County, Virginia, as of January 1, 1956 to January 11 1957• This coverage will be held in force until such time as the Board of Supervisors acts during its January session, at which time the policy will be issued and forwarded to you. We have been requested by our agents to in- form you of the fact that any claims arising under the above policy will be serviced and paid by our local office at the above address. We wish to thank you for this opportunity of serving you. Ver truly yo rs, A. Hodges r. JAH rP Special Agent FFI CC - Mr. Maurice Saunders ��wr ,.1•�E SUCCESSORS TO CLAMORNB, GoODm= & Gomm THOMAS L. ALFRIBND & SON Established 1876 Established 1857 INSURAN(M 610 MUTUAL BUILDING P.O. BOX 422 TELEPHONE: 3.6713 RICHMOND 3, VA. December 27, 1955 Mr. Me We Burnett, Executive Secretary to the Board of Supervisors Chesterfield Court House Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: In view of the fact that Weekly Indemnity for Volunteer Fire Depart- ments is usually payable for a period of One hundred four (104) weeks, we would like to submit the following ai an alternate bid for coverage from January 1, 1956 for a term of one (1) year. Accidental Death Benefit $3,000. Loss of two members (hands, feet or eyes) 3,000. Loss of hand or foot 11500. Loss of sight of one eye 19000. Accident Medical Reimbursement Benefit, Maximum 11000. Weekl Accident Indemnity payable rir- ©m7irst day for as long as One hundred four (104) weeks 25.00 The Annual premium for this coverage would be Four hundred sixty-eight and 75/100 (468.75) dollars. We wish to thank you for your consideration of this proposal. Sincerely yours, GODDIN, GOODRIDGE §c ROBERTSON, By: J 'Morris Saunders, Jr Insurance Since 1851 SUCCESSORS TO C1,MBORNE, GOODRIDa & GoDDIN THOMAS L. AL mml) & SON Established 1876 Established 1857 INSURANCE 610 MUTUAL BUILDING P. O. BOX 422 RICHMOND 3, VA. Mr. Me We Burnett, Executive Secretary to the Board of Supervisors Chesterfield Court House Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: TELEPHONE: 3.6713 December 27, 1955 In accordance with your request for on Accident coverage for the Volunteer Fire Departments of Chesterfield Countyt Virginia, we wish to advise that we will insure the 12 Volunteer Fire Departments effective January 1, 1956 for a term of one (1) year providing cover- age in accordance with the attached quote "Request for Proposal to Insure Volunteer Fire Departments of Chesterfield County, Virginia." The coverage will be in accordance with the enclosed Specimen policy with an endorsement to the policy making the Weekly Indemnity of $25, payable for a period of Two hundred sixty (260) weeks. Please note that the Two hundred sixty (260) weeks of Weekly Indemnity is the equivalent of five (5) additional months coverage when compared to a policy paying One hundred (100) dollars monthly for a period of Five (5) years. This proposal is submitted on behalf of Fireman's Fund Indemnity Company whose financial statement you will find enclosed, and for whom we are Resident Agents. We wish to thank you for this opportunity to bid on this coverage and hope we may have the pleasure of serving the County. Sincerely yours, GODDIN GOODRIDGE & ROBERTSON By: r 'a��z'l.��. J. Morris'uaunders, Jr Resident Agent for Fireman's Fund Indemnity Company REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO INSURE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA The County of Chesterfield invites you to submit a proposal for insuring the volunteer firemen with a minimum coverage of the benefits outlined below. This coverage to be while the fireman is engaged in performing the duties of a volunteer fireman: Accidental Death Benefit $3,000.00 Loss of two members (hands, feet or eyes) 3,000.00 Loss of hand or foot 1,500.00 Loss of sight of one eye 1,000.00 Accident medical reimbursement Benefit, Maximum 1,000.00 Monthly Accident Indemnity payable'' from first dayfor as long as five g years lfl@-100 The insurance is to cover a total of 12 fire departments, located in 12 different locations within the County limits. There is a total of 24 pieces of equipment, with a total of approximately 540 volunteer firemen. Coverage is to be effective January 1, 1956. The quotation must be submitted to the Office of the Executive Secretary, Chesterfield, Virginia, not later than 10 A.M. on the 29th day of December, 1955• The right is reserved to reject any or all proposals submitted. Please show subject and closing date on outside of envelop. Annual Premium $ 8� 5.94 . Name of Company submitting proposal Fireman's Fund Indemnity Company Agent GODDINi_ G00DRIDGE & ROBERTSON B, .: Morris Saunders, Jr. 17 n For employees of Mr. M. W. Burnett - Executive Secretary Chesterfield County Volunteer Fire Department Group Accident Insurance Program Presented by: H. Stuart Smith 6F Loyalty and morale are not for sale. But here is a definite step you can take toward pro- moting the welfare and security of your to employees .. . a step which will merit an improved attitude on the part of your em- ployees toward their jobs and their company. Put this constructive force to work for you .. as business leaders all over the country have done. OF December 1955 .W C 0 N N E C T I C U T GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, HARTFO RD C 0 N N E C T I C U T 71 M 10 In 9 Group Accident Insurance For The Volunteer Fire Companies of Chesterfield County A special policy is issued to the Volunteer Fire Companies providing blanket accident insurance coverage to members of the Company pay- able in case of death or total disability caused by an accident occurring while the member is actually on duty as a fireman and as a member of the Fire Company, including injuries sustained while go- ing to or returning from fires, at tests, trials, fire dirlls or parades of any fire -fighting apparatus. Volunteer Firemen are those members of a Fire Company who have some regular occupation other than fighting fires. Regular members whose occupation is that of fireman and who receive a regular salary for their services are covered under the policy only while goint to, at, or return- ing from a fire. Application - Special Application to be signed by a town officer or an officer of the Fire Company or Fire District. Policy - A Master Policy is issued covering the whole Group. �W Certificates - No certificates are issued. Age Limits - Minimum 16 years. Maximum 70 years. Principal Sum Payments,- The full principal sum is payable for loss of Life to Both hands or both feet One hand and one foot Sight of both eyes. One-half the principal sum is payable for loss of either a hand or a foot. One-third the principal sum is payable for the loss of the sight of one eye. Principal Sum payments are made only provided such loss occurs within 90 days of date of accident. If a member suffers more than one loss in the same accident, only one payment, the greatest, will be made. rNI M M Indemnity for loss of life is payable to the member's Estate. All other indemnities are payable to the member. Weekly Indemnity for Total Disability - If injuries do not result in a loss for which a principal sum payment is made but ;prevent member from performing any and every duty of his usual occupation, weekly indemnity will be paid from date of accident through period of continuous total disability but in no case to exceed 104 weeks. Payable every four weeks. Weekly indemnity is payable for the period from the date of accident to the date of a principal sum loss providdd disability is total during that per- iod. Indemnity for Medical Treatment of Non disabling Injuries - If the injuries do not result in a principal sum loss, or total disability for which weekly indemnity is paid, but do require medical or surgical attention, the Com- pany will pay the cost thereof to an amount not exceeding weekly indemnity for one week. Premiums are payalle annually in advance. If the binder premium accompany- ing a new application is less than the annual premium, the balance must be to collected before the policy may be delivered . Medical Reimbursement Benefit - For a basic annual extra premium of $40.00 the policy may provide reimbursement of the member for actual expenses incurred by him for medical or surgical treatment, hospital confinement or the employment of a trained nurse due to an injury covered by the policy provided such expense is incurred within twenty-six weeks of the injury. The maximum reimbursement under this provision is $1,000 for any one member in any one accident. Census of Members Names of members need not and should not be submitted to the Insurance Company. In LN 7 rn SCHEDULE`OF BENEFITS n Accidental Death Loss of 2 Body Loss of One .Body Medical Weekly to And Dismemberment Members Member Reimbursement Income $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 1,500 $ 1,000 $25* *(Monthly Basis $25 x 4 113 = $108.33 per month) n Weekly income in the amount of $25 will be paid for a maximum of 2 years per total disability. SCHEDULE OF COST Annually - $945.00 This is blanket cost to insure 12 departments containing 24 units and 540 volunteer firemen. 11 In In MCDANIEL RUCSER INSURANCE AGi@NCY General Insurance and Bonds DAY 3-8668 0 NITS 6-7403 318 MUTUAL BUILDING RICHMOND 19, VIRGINIA December 16, 1955 Office of Executive Secretary Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia Re: Volunteer Fire Department Accident Insurance Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, enclosed is quotation for insuring the firemen of the Volunteer Fire Departments of Chesterfield County. The Monthly Accident Indemnity in the enclosed quotation exceeds the monthly minimum requirement in your proposal as it is payable on the basis of $25.00 weekly rather than $100.00 monthly. The indemnity, however, is payable only for as long as two years. All claims under this policy will be handled here in Richmond and every assistance given a member in filing a claim. The drafts in payment of claims will also be issued here in Richmond and the members are thus assured of prompt and efficient service. Yours sincerely, MCDANIEL RUCKER INSURANCE AGENCY MR: r Enclosure REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO INSURE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTS OF CHESTERFIELD COtNTY,VIRGINIA The County of Chesterfield invites you to submit a proposal for insuring the volunteer firemen with a minimum coverage of the benefits outlined below. This coverage to be while the fireman is engaged in performing the duties of a volunteer fireman: Accidental Death Benefit $30000000 Loss of two members ( hands, feet, or eyes) 39000.00 Loss of hand or foot 10500.00 Loss of sight of one eye 10000.00 Accident Medical Reimbursement Benefit, Maximum 11,000000 Monthly Accident Indemnity payable from first day for as long as five years 100.00 The insurance is to cover a total of 12 fire departments, located in 12 different locations within the County limits. There is a total of 24 pieces of equipment, with a total of approximately 540 volunteer firemen. Coverage is to be effective January 1, 1955o The quotation must be submitted to the Office of the Executive Secretary, Chesterfield, Virginia, not later than 3:00 p.me on the 21st day of December, 1955, The right is reserved to rejedt any or all proposals submitted. Please show subject and closing date on outside of envelope. Annual Premium # 468.75 Nam® of Company submitting proposal FMEHA NIS FUND INDEMNITY COMPANY Agent: MCDANIEL RUCK INSURANCE AGENCY '....a By: C,�G� �V: n n [I .' ` ► `► INSURANCE AGENCY RICHMOND 20, VIRGINIA December 20, 1955 TELEPHONE 84-6559 Office of Executive Secretary Chesterfield, Virginia Subject: Chesterfield County Volunteer Fire Department Dear Sir: The following quotation is submitted in response to your inquiry. The .:closest we have been able to come to your, specifications is covered by an American Casualtv policy, as outlined below. You will note in one or two instances it is even more generous thanAlyou stipulate. We can provide the following coverages at the annual premium shown:" Accidental Des.th----------------------------- 3;000.00 Loss of Sight, Both Eyes--------------------- 3,000.00 Loss of 2 Hands or 2 Feet or either Hand or -Foot and Sight of One Eye --- $39000.00 Loss of One hand, or One Foot or Sight of Oneeye ------------------------------------ $1,500.00 $25.00 Weekly Indemnity from the First Day up tp 260 weeks for Total Disability. 112.50 Partial Disability up to 4 Weeks. 1,000.00 Blanket Medical Expense. ANNUAL PREMIUM----$1011.25 Coverage identical to the above, except a period of Total Disability limited to 104 Weeks, the annual premium will be $843.75- Claims are paid in Richmond and Service is Excellent: Among the nearby Fire Departments, Powhatan, Mineral, Hopewell, and Williamsburg are covered by American Casualty. I will be glad to discuss this plan with you personally. Serely ours, John Sobrito NJS:jh SO 00M1 r' of 0h0#tsrfield iATitN you to sk bait is proposal for Invourlog the volunteer firema with 0 XWOM soTerage of the b0Wfit S ro«etlined b#UW9 This 00VOP400 to be WU20 the firaaae► ie 4046W let P*Yft3nftg the duttets of s voleat iso r Brea m s 'oldeatel Death 'petit $30000*00 Lois of ter+ a srs (hae►ds,ioot or oyrre►) $0000*00 Louess of hid or foot lapgp," iat s fight of came : ,.. 1*000tW .ocideat Madieal sinbWoomm ttt Beeent0 gazium t 100tl 900 Moathlar Aooideat itdamitro pWable from first deb► for as long as flvo yen" It 000 The iaswrasoo is to cover a total of 18 i`irct departuaats, loesttecl in 13 dlffeetsat 200stleas w1this the coteaty limitse There is a total of 2 d pisses of etquIpemsat, wit$ a total of appresimttely 3e0 voluntctsr fireer ee oorerve is to be offeative J,asnuaw 1, 1956e The quotation must be s°ubAdtted to the offios of the Stteoutive 2eetretWye Chesterfield,, Virgiai,es not later then 3:00 pone on the 21st date► of i4ceabor, .19tte The right is reserved to reject aiW or all proposals subalttetd• Please show subj"t mad closing dr to od cmtsida of savel6po. AMt tl ftmalvm $ Naar of CostpW subet14t109 proposal A erican Ca "I y Co. of Reading, Pa. Aemb S brio In A enc M "I Th( rlddi and Casualt Compa1p of " jwYo r k FRANK A. CHRISTENSEN, PRESIDENT J. VICTOR HERD, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT CHILDREY SCOTT & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, AGENTS 1 1 19 MUTUAL BUILDING, RICHMOND 19. VIRGINIA Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield, Va. Dear Mr. Burnett: RE: Volunteer Fire Department Accident Insurance Bid December 28,1955 We are pleased to quote below the coverages and annual premium there- for with regard to the above. COVERAGE: —� to Accidental Death 2. Loss of Any Two Members, Hands, Feet or Eyes 3. Loss of One Hand or Foot 4. Loss of Sight of One Eye 5• Blanket Medical Expense 6. Meekly Endemnity--From 1st. Day for 260 Weeks if totally disabled 7. Weekly Endemnity--From st. Day for 4 Weeks if partially disabled $3,000. 3,000. 11900. 1,000, 1)000. 25, per week 12.50 per week ANNUAL PREMIUM: 41011.25 INSURED WITH: American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania Thanking you for the opportunity to bid on this, I am, Very truly yours, William H. Parrish, Agent Childrey Scott & Co. 1119 Mutual Building Richmond, Va. REQUEST FOR PORPOSAL TO DAOMM VOUNTEER FIRE DEPART%MTS OF CHESTERFIELD COINTY, VIRGINIA The County of Chesterfield invites you to submit a proposal for insuring the volunteer firemen with a minimum coverage of the benefits outlined below. This coverage to be while the fireman is engaged in performing the duties of a volunteer fireman: Accidental Death Benefit $39000.00 Loss of two members ( hands, feet or eyes) 39000,00 Lass of hand or foot_ 19500.00 Loss of sight of ore eye 19000.00 Accidental Medical Reimbursement Benefit, Maximum 1*000000 Monthly Accident Indemnity payable from first day for as long as five years 100.00 The insurance is to cover a total of 12 fire departments, located in 12 different locations within the County limits. There is a total of 24 pieces of equipment, with a total of approximately 540 volunteer firemen. Coverage is to be effective January 1, 1956. The quotation must be submitted to the Office of the Executive Secretary, Chesterfield, Virginia, not later than 3:00 p.me on the 21st day of December, 1955. The right is reserved to reject any or all proposals submitted. Please show subject and closing date on outside of envelope. Annual Premium *,,902.50 . Name of Company submitting proposal Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company Agent: WM. H. BRANCH & /-�c-)1�7 By: (� 227 ST PAUL STREET BALTIMORE, MD. SURETY - CASUALTY - FIRE MUHLEMAN & KAYHOE, INC. GENERAL INSURANCE - SURETY BONDS 505 E. FRANKLIN STREET RICHMOND, VA„ 60 JOHN STREET NEW YORK, N. Y. December 28, 1955 Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield Courthouse, Virginia Dear Sir: Based on 24 pieces of fire -fighting equipment; 12 fire departments- and 480 volunteer firemen, we hereby quote in the Continental Casualty Company for group accident insurance for the Chesterfield County Volunteer Fire Department as follows: Benefits: 1) Accidental Death 3000.00 2) Dismemberment - two members 3000.00 3) Dismemberment - hand or foot 1500.00 4) Loss of sight - one eye 1500.00 5) Blanket Medical 1000.00 6) V,ieekly Indemnity - from 1st day for a maximum period of 104 weeks 25.00 Annual premium quotation - $762.50 Please note that our quotation is based on a two-year maximum indemnity period. , ROBERT J. MACLELLAN, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOAF ROBERT L. MACLELLAN, PRESIDENT r L. N. WEBB, EXECUTIVE VICE PRES. pJI SAM E. MILES, VICE PRES. & SEC. EST t"a 67 PR LIFE AND ACCID] HOME WM. H. BRANCH & CO„ GENERAL AGENTS ACCIDENT DEPARTMENT 405 VIRGINIA BUILDING ONE NORTH FIFTH STREET TELEPHONE, 2.9041 ENT URANCE COMPANY Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: O GA RICHMOND 19, VA. November 17, 1955 Re: Provident I&A Policy No.13G--45016 Volunteer Fire DePts_of Chesterfield County In line with our telephone conversation of ,yesterday, we are now pleased to enclose the following in connection with the captioned policy. 1. Endorsement for attachment to the policy adding the Dale Volunteer Fire Department to coverage effective November 17,1955• 2. Renewal Certificate continuing the Master Policy in effect for the year from December 8, 1955• We now have twelve departments covered under this Master Policy. The names thereof are set forth on the attached endorsement, and I feel sure that we have them correctly shown. Should there be any discrepancy, please let me know. I wish to take this opportunity to again assure you of our appreciation for this business. Very truly yours, WM, IiU BRA%TCHI'& CO. WHB%ps Enclosures ENDORSEMENT Effective ---------- N.9Ysmb_er._17-,--1'� ---•----------- Not valid unless countersigned by a duly authorized agent. In consideration of a pro rata premium of $3.85, to cover the period from November 17, 1955 to December 8, 1955, it is mutually understood and agreed that the members of the Dale Volunteer Fire Department are hereby insured under the terms and provisions of Policy No.BG3-45016, to which this endorsement is attached. The annual premium for this endorsement is $67.50. The total annual premium for said policy will be $902.50, effective December 8, 1955• The Departments covered under this policy are as follows: Ettrick, Chester, Manchester, Bensley, Bon Air —Southampton, Midlothian, Enon, Clover Hill, Matoaka, Wagstaff Circle, Forest View and Dale. Subject to all conditions, agreements and limitations of the policy as written, except as herein provided. Attached to and forming part of Policy No. RC=— 5016 issued Ta ijttesier ire Departments jDof ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, CHATTANOOGA, TENN., to Y 1 a of m... Virginia CountersigiVd. at ru.,s t • a �. ♦ , i • Authorized Agent Vice President -Secretary. WM, Ho BRAMN & CO. 0 COMP � E K PHONE 3-9041 Vol. Fire Depts. of Chesterfield County J njittalice S E R V I C E 405 VIRGINIA BUILDING ONE NORTH FIFTH STREET RICHMOND 19, VIRGINIA November 17, 1955 DATL c:V-rwn■ 11/17 Provident I& BG-45ol6 End. adding Dale Volunteer Fire Ad '1 Premium $ 3.85 Department to coverage 12/8 Provident 1& BG-4.5016 Accident Policy year Q02.50 $906.35 V %I A L s roc � W V �'�ar iNsuw'a O. B. GATES SHERIFF RICHMOND 26521 - EX. 16 PETERSBURG 4370 - EX. 16 CHESTER 2181 - EX. 16 Board of Supervisors F� Offtre of t4t $4Eriff CHESTERFIELD COUNTY CHESTERFIELD C. H., VA. January 9 1956 Chesterfield County , Virginia . Dear Sir : My Deputy Mr, Gilliam H. Cogbill asked me to take the matter up DEPUTIES G. H. COGBILL H. E. RUDY with you about his salary , he is not satisfied with his recent raise of 216.00 per year , he now receAves 3.120.00 per year or 260.00 per month and he hopes the Board and Compensation Board will agree to pay him i 314-00 per month . Mr. Cogbill has been working for me about eighteen years, and is a very good Deputy , any thing that you can do for him will be appreciated „ Very truly yours Chesterfield County , Virginia ¢r yj 3 120 HOME OFFICE • COLUMBUS, OHIO County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Va. Att: Mr, Burnett. Dear Sir: Chester, Virginia January 111 1955 Re: Fleet Policy renewal # FL53-990-606 This is to advise that I am today binding your vehicles on the same basis that policy above was issued last year, This is being done in order to give us an opportunity to get together on the renewal policy. Yours truly, ci�� o hlye Chester, Va. P. S. Attention of Commerical Auto Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. Lynchburg., Va. Mr. Burnett is extremely busy now due to the fact that a Water Bond issue is coming up and we have been trying to me(ht on the renewal application to get the bid prepared for the Board's consideration but have not been able to do so we probably will get together Thursday Jan. 5, 1956. We have handled it this before and if it is not 0. K. please call me immediately. Leo Myers. cc: Natiomaide Mutual Ins. Co. WIN GOMMONWEALTN- OF VIR�I N I�. a �r5 MINETREE FOLKES, JR. �`fMVERcrM' ' CHESTERFIELD, HENRICO AND COLONIAL HEIGHTS STATE -PLANTERS BANK BLDG. RICHMOND, VA. HOUSE OF DELEGATES December 28, 1955 Mr. M. W. Burnett Executive Secretary Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia Dear 14elvin: COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS: CURRENCY AND COMMERCE PRIVILEGES AND ELECTIONS ROADS AND INTERNAL NAVIGATION PUBLIC PROPERTY This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of December 21, with the resolutions of the Board enclosed. I attended the Welfare Board's meeting November 17th, at which time we discussed several proposed changes. Ernest Gates is preparing these bills, some of which are covered by the resolutions of the Board. It was suggested that a change in Section 63-73.1 regarding accounting procedures for handling special funds be approved by 1,1r. Moore, our treasurer. Ernest is no doubt seeing about these. It was also thought advisable to discuss some of these with Colonel Cope- land before the session meets. Some of the lawyers in the area seem to think we should try for the Chesterfield Circuit again and others say wait. We will have to decide what is best at this time. I am not definitely opposed to trying again, but feel certain we can arrive at the right decision. Meetings regarding the referendum are picking up as well as the interest. I have made three talks and have two more. Am mailing and distributing literature. Hope to see you before the session begins. With kindest regards and Best Wishes for the New Year. Sincerely, P' �etreel`_Folkes, `fir. AT : JR/vhw �MMONWEALTR OF V1P,�I G *490 RA EDWARD M. HUDGINS 8 CHESTERFIELD AND COLONIAL HEIGHTS fEMpE0.T 704 FIRST NATIONAL _ BANK BLDG. RICHMOND, VA. HOUSE OF DELEGATES December 27, 1955 Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary, County of Chesterfield, Chesterfield, Virginia. Dear Mr, Burnett: COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS: COUNTIES, CITIES AMC) TOWNS FEDERAL RELATIONS GENERAL LAWS OFFICERS AND OFFICES AT THE CAPITOL I have your letter of December 21, enclosing therewith a number of resolutions and requests of the Board of Supervisors. I will comment on each resolution by separate paragraph. I am doing all within my power to secure favorable vote for the Referendum on January 9, in order to pave the way for amending Section 141 of the Constitution of Virginia. A Bill for an additional courtfbr Chesterfield County was, as you know, presented to the Legislature by me last year. We were able to get the Bill out of the House Judiciary Committee, and as a matter of fact it was passed by the House. When it reached the Senate it was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. That Committee had Bills for the creation of three or four other Judgeships, and instead of passing any of these Bills creating new Judgeships, they referred the entire matter to a Legislative Advisory Committee for study and approval. The Advisory Committee has con- sidered the matter very carefully, and in recent report recommended the creation of several new Judgeships at various point throughout the State, but did not recommend the creation of a new Judgeship for Chesterfield County. It did recommend the elimination of Powhatan County from this Circuit, which the Committee reported would lighten the load somewhat. While it is my in- tention to introduce a Bill to create a new circuit for Chesterfield County, in view of the report of the Advisory Committee I do not believe that such a Bill would pass either the House or the Senate. My present inclination is not to request that Powhatan be detached from our present circuit, as to do so would detract from our chances of obtaining a separate circuit for Chester- field later on. I think it is just a question of time before we will be able to obtain a separate circuit for Chesterfield, but I am very doubtful that it can be done at this session of the Legislature. With reference to the request that the section on "Hospitalization and Treatment of ImUg" Persons" be amended, I beg to advise that this mat- ter was taken up with me by the Welfare Board in a recent meeting which I attended at their request. I told the Board at that time that I did not know exactly what connection Senator Bird had had with this particular leg- islation, but that he was much more conversant and famiba.r with laws relating to our State hospitals than I was, especially in view of the fact that he has been and possibly still is on the Board of Visitors of the Medical College of Virginia. I further advised the Welfare Board that I felt that h h 1` suc and "Jg CM `4"O° — 2 — as might be indicate in connection with this Section should be with Senator Bird, and that, of course, I would be glad to assist in any way that I could. I believe Mrs. Lucy Corr has taken the matter up with Senator Bird already. The Boardts approval of the Welfare Department's request to eliminate the "Submission of Biannual Welfare Budget" has been and is being handled by me. Any time one proposes to change an accounting practice a great many clearances are necessary. I have already taken the matter up with the Budgeting Bureau, Mr. J. Gordon Bennett, State Auditor, and I will this week handle the matter with Colonel Copeland, Superintendent of Welfare and Institutions. If all necessary clearances can be obtained, I will have the proper Bill prepared and introduced. I believe that this covers all of the matters concerning which you have written me. If there are any other matters which the Board desires its representatives to handle, please do not hesitate to call upon us. H/b Sincerely yours, 4wa'AordJM4. Hudg s. cc: Honorable Lloyd C. Bird Phipps & Bird,, Inc. 6th and Bird Streets Richmond, Virginia Honorable Minetree Folkes, Jr. State Planters Bank Building Richmond, Virginia M oMl,A NWEALT K LLOYD C. BIRD 34TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT CHARLES CITY, CHESTERFIELD, HENRICO, JAMES CITY, NEW KENT AND CITY OF WILLIAMSBURG 303 SOUTH STH STREET RICHMOND, VIRGINIA Mr. M. W. Burnett Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: OF Vip,INI SENATE January 9, 1956 COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS: CHAIRMAN, NOMINATIONS AND CONFIRMATIONS FINANCE PRIVILEGES AND ELECTIONS PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS AND EDUCATION AGRICULTURE, MINING AND MANUFACTURING INTERSTATE COOPERATION Your letter written on January 9, together with the resolution passed by the Board of Supervisors, has been received. The objective of the resolution is one in which we are all in sympathy. I would like to do anything that I can to help out with the situation. I have talked with some of my friends and they think that the powers of the General Assembly are restricted so far as granting pensions is concerned under section 63, paragraphs 10 and 13, of our Constitution. I shall be glad to hear from you again after you have considered these provisions. Sincerely c Lloyd C. rrd LCB/A CC: Hon. Edward M. Hudgins Hon. Minetree Folkes, Jr. a � C. B. Form 42 JESSE W. DILLON CHAIRMAN CAROLINE L. BIESEN EXECUTIVE SECRETARY COMMO COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMONO TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD: You are hereby notified that the Compensation Board has tentatively fixed the salary of the Commissioner of the Revenue of the County of Chesterfield at $ 5v600.00 for the calendar year beginning January 1, 1956, and the ex- penses of office for that year at $ 21,387.00 , the details of which are given below. Given under my hand this 20th day of December I 1955. Salary of the Commissioner of the Revenue - Detail of Expenses - Personal Services - Wales B. Ingram, Field Deputy J. E. Holt, Field Deputy Joseph E. Vaden , Field Deputy Florence G. Johnson, Office Deputy Erlene C. Collie, Typist Joyce R. Garner, Typist Margaret M. Martin, Typist Betty Ballowe, Typist *Extra help J. GORDON BENNETT C. H. MORRISSETT EX•OFFICIO MEMBERS Chairman $ 59600.00 $ 32240.00 22580.00 850.00 3,060.00 2,520.00 2,100.00 29520.00 29400.00 1,000.00 $20,270.00 Other Expenses - Premium on official bond of Commissioner $ 7.00 Mileage for use of Commissioner of the Revenue on official business (7� per mile) 450.00 Postage 500.00 Advertising 160.00 $ 1,117.00 Total for all purposes - *Names to be furnished Compensation Board Copy to: Mr. H. B. Walker Commissioner of the Revenue Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia 21,387.00 $26,987.00 n n C. B. Form 43 JESSE W. DILLON CHAIRMAN CAROLINE L. BIESEN EXECUTIVE SECRETARY COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMOND TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD: J. GORDON BENNETT C. H. MORRISSETT EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS You are hereby notified that the Compensation Board has tentatively fixed the salary of the Sheriff of the County of Chesterfield at $ 59600.00 for the calendar year begin- ning January 1, 1956, and the expenses of office for that year at $ 11,493.00, the details of which are given below. Given under my hand this SiSt 20thday of December, 1955. Chairman Salary of Sheriff - Detail of Expenses - Personal Services - Gilliam Herbert Cogbill, Deputy $ 39120.00 Hampden S. Mann, Deputy 2,904.00 *Deputy 2,904.00 Emily E. Adams, Clerk 2,100.00 11 028.00 Other Expenses - Premium on official bonds of Sheriff and deputies $ 40.00 Stationery and office supplies 250.00 Postage 125.00 Telephone and telegraph 50.00 Three county owned automobiles $ 465.00 Total for all purposes - *Name to be furnished Compensation Board Number of part-time deputies authorized - none Copy to: Mr. 0. B. Gates, Sr. Sheriff, Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia Department of Welfare and Institutions Richmond 69 Virginia $ 59600.00 11,493.00 $17,093.00 C. B. Form 41 L GoMMo _i�A JESSE W. DILLON CHAIRMAN CAROLINE L. BIESEN EXECUTIVE SECRETARY qR= COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMOND TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD: J. GORDON BENNETT C. H. MORRISSETT EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS You are hereby notified that the Compensation Board has tentatively fixed the salary of the Attorney for the Common- wealth of the County of Chesterfield at $ 6,500.00 for the calendar year beginning January 1, 1956, and the expenses of office for that year at $ 2,520.00 the details of which are given below. Given under my hand this 20th day of December I 1955. Chairman Salary of Attorney for the Commonwealth- $6,500.00 Detail of Expenses - Personal Services - Frances B. Brown, Secretary $2,520.00 2,520.00 Total for all purposes- Copy to: Ernest P. Gates Attorney for the Commonwealth --Elect Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia $9,020.00 M `400 C . B . Form 42 COMMON JESSE W. DILLON CHAIRMAN CAROLINE L. BIESEN EXECUTIVE SECRETARY COMPENSATION BOARD RICHMOND ViR�INt�. TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD: You are hereby notified that the Compensation Board has tentatively fixed the salary of the Treasurer of the County of Chesterfield at $ 6,600.00 for the calendar year beginning January 1, 1956, and the ex- penses of office for that year at $ 239300.00 , the details of which are given below. Given under my hand this 20th day of December 1955. Salary of Treasurer - Detail of Expenses - Personal Services - Frank E. Landrum, Deputy Mary W. McGuire, Deputy Frances Q. Cole, Deputy Margaret L. Mumma, Clerk Ann H. Shelton, Clerk Bernice E. Smiley, Clerk Florence B. Woolard, Clerk *Extra help Other Expenses - Premium on safe and vault, interior robbery J. GORDON BENNETT C. H. MORRISSETT EX.OFFICIO MEMBERS Chairman $ 69600.00 $ 4,620.00 3,000.00 29760.00 29520.00 2,520.00 2,040.00 2,520.00 640.00 $20,620.00 and messenger insurance $ 95.00 Mileage for use of Treasurer on official business (7� per mile) 315.00 Cost of issuing dog medals at field stations 620.00 Postage 19500.00 Advertising 150.00 $ 680,E 23, 300.00 Total for all purposes- $29,900.00 *Names to be furnished Compensation Board Copy to: Mr. George W. Moore, Jr. Treasurer , Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia m m J i 1 00, r7K� t rc .c f r,-•s r -�-a ! vt d J %f �o v k S SC4 a ,f', /Py' `;-7 !1- .l-e .. S Ale -A .xe �..,•q/ 7`9r�.-. G/' iyto 77o y a"Y% Ode a 2, aejE;r / C-4 /-00/7 J Pa m 41:2 o, 79� - _asap Fr & al 7`to soh — f ec✓a. e -- Ads fG Kcic.� �ri�i o/ -r 11 'C C� S G L✓ c� v� -� a, / woJ% Ile oasv., GAO ! N X f ,k s7� �YlY, r/`G jy1,rT✓C,f � s�/Y : (.JR I ! / Se c�..�.� 6a 40 4or c A I - IL s 4 a. srelr~-A4 My 617 J^c- ftvvk , Mv. Dom. f /<I I I �'-.e-ur• r M /I f ..2' o Al -S-/Vtlipl r J-C- hips,//. V / — eke C -71W /0 4 / / ' - &/i4o, �%S_—Ctear�fl 000 %hQ.yV 1 to C.l� �P - .tf"7� �s y oip�s� �, �✓ i T!• fti�r �� ems- w w�'l l .fl j► / sr 3 _ ._ / ' e /ilk" 6Jere• �l9 3/ /00 ,,// I N -O Keq� Y,' Ii7� 7D GL' os r� vese+C, ,d A16 -- ;Iz P-e,,,3L e As 'Cly &�� - `7 V 7 ✓' G e �D pe e s b e c .e. vtt 410 �4 us- e- r nr �J�IwsSes• /fla - 40 le - _ _ I?t G41 m m 2, 3• il C ooflcl'c', lal- - hn y . a_r t lei -A T: T Dr. GI•lJ��s, me- A'OvLogs 7L- (-3/01,7 r,"4 f. --� A4--e - r)l Y k-e hl.OV-4r-S., _ 127.e- 0, 74g, D;4 - 4,-;- 9 4- 4- 0,"4-,;7- c/ rZ7 m Fin A cov.. �r— xo IA h S o H s l a'win^ — Are •f3� xqr�w y ' • , L/-A, • / i/ .. P)A� -�- S-r-'r- - 8 soo ` 7 llx&14X�C� m in v P�,, (2.r:,a ' r � ci J_•_ • w.. Wit^ A C77 s� C- L:l I r4, � `� G w,e c`s k. A ' piew ur.6:," CC� t M c b, Ids