06-22-77 MinutesMr. O'Neill amis the m~eting to order at 9:05 a.m.
1976-77 Budget
1. D~crea~e Planned Budget F~pe~se:
11-015-105.0 Con~uter Opera~ors
11-015-214.1 ~e ~ntg
1977-78
Total Increase
$ 13,000
13,000
15,000
$ 2,000
1,000
2,100
2,000
1,000
4,000
1,600
50,000
$ 63,700
$ 63,700
8(41,000)
$ 22,300
$ 9,127
3,000
· 6 552
$ 22,700
18,679
$ 41,379
40,000
$ 1,379
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, it is resolVed that the Mental Health Budget
be am_~nded for the 1976-77 fiscal year as follows:
Increase
Accotmt Account Name (Decrease)
11-094-000.0 Service Assurance
199.0 Other Contractual Services $ (600)
214.1 Ymchine Rmntal 600
220.0 Travel 2,000
312.0 Vehicle op'eration (2,000)
Total $ 0
11-095-000.0 Shelter Occupational Center
104.2 Trainees $ 101
200.0 Advertising 50
207.0 Electric Current 500
214.0 P~nt-Office 700
217.0 Telephone 280
220.0 Travel 1,200
294.0 FICA 704
299.1 Other Costs 200
312.0 Vehicle Operation 800
319.0 Office Supplies 250
399,0 Other Supplies 300
405.0 Equipment 1,559
Total $ 6,644
11-096-000.0 Group Home Adults
104.0 Group Honm Parents $ 400
207.0 Electric Service 100
214.0 Rent 840
217.0 Telephone 245
220.0 Travel 700
240.0 Consultant Service 698
294.0 FICA 485
310.0 Food 1,020
311.0 Fuel 90
312.0 Vehicle Operation (1,000)
315.0 Books 100
403.0 Pt~miture 300
Total $ 3,978
11-098-000.0 Supportive Apartmmnts .
240.0 Consultant Services $ 260
Total $ 260
11-099-000.0 M~ntal Health Clinic
206.0 Dues and Subscriptions $ 100
207.0 Electric Current 1,250
214.1 Machine Rental 450
215.0 Repairs and Maintenance 450
217.0 Telephone 2,500
220.0 Travel 1,250
311.0 Fuel 700
312.0 Vehicle Operation (1,250)
399.0 Other Supplies 100
405.0 Office Equipmmnt 800
Total
$ 6,350
$ 17,232
And be it further resolved that Planned Budget ~mvenue Account 11-000-711.3, Ymntal Health Fees
be increased by $17,232.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, _.Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
Mr. Ramsey stated Mr. Ritz and Mr. 7ook have enrolled in a management course and have asked that
County policy regarding payment after satisfactory completion be waived and that the cost be paid
at this tim~. Mr. Bamsey adds funds were budgeted for this expenditure. Upon rec~rmndation of
the Asst. Co~mty Attorney, it is generally agreed that this variance to the County policy (which
would grant payment prior to satisfactory completion of the course) be denied.
Mr. McElfish states all County procedures were not followed at a previous nmeting when the Board
adopted a resolution asking the Highway Department to acceot the roads in the Greenfield Subdivi-
sion, Section I, into the State System and there are sor~ {ninor items that need to be addressed
before this should have been passed. After consideration of this matter, it is on motion of
Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the resolution asking the Highway Departmmnt
to accept the roads in Greenfield, Section I, passed by the Board at its meeting on May 25, 1977, \
be and it hereby is rescinded.
Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
It is on motion of Mr. BOokman, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the Highway
Department be and it hereby is reqUested ,to accept the roads in Brigh.t Oaks, Section 1, and
wood Estates Apartments.
BRIGHT OAKS, SECTION 1
Saddlebrook Road - beginning at its intersection with
River Road (State Route 602) southerly .08 mile to its
intersection with Twin Poplar Circle thence southerly
· 42 mile to its intersection with Wild Turkey Rnn
thence southerly .09 mile to a temporary turnaround.
.59 mile
Twin Poplar Circle - beginning at its intersection
Saddlebrook Road easterly . 03 mile to a cul-de-sac.
.03 mile
Wild Turkey Run - beginning at its intersection with
Saddlebrook Road easterly .07 mile to State ~Dute 636.
.07 mile
RDLLINGWOOD ESTATES ~~S
Kim Drive - beginning at end of State maintenance
(Route 2169) southeasterly .09 mile to its intersection
with Heybridge Drive.
.09 mile
Heybridge Drive - begiming at its intersection with
Kim Drive northeasterly . 06 'mile.
· 06. mile
Ayes: Mrs. Gircne, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
It is on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the Board accepts 'an agreement
between the County and the developers of Greenbriar, Sec. 3, and authorizes the Chairman to sign a
save-harmless agreement with the Highway Department for certain easen~nts that may be necessary to
be acquired in the development of Greenbriar, Sec. 3, and be it further resolved that the Board
accepts m~ agreement between the developers of Treemont and authorizes the Chairman to sign a save-
harmless agreement with the Higb~ay Department for certain easements that may be necessary to be
acquired in the development of Treem~nt.
Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
After some discussion_of the matter, it is on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman,
resOlved that the drainage crew be allowed to continue the transportation arrangement that
exists for its employees.
Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
After some discussion of the matter, it is on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman,
resolved that the following street light policy be and it hereby is adopted:
1. Twenty-five (25) houses should be located within a 1,000 foot radius of the proposed location
or hazardous safety conditions are reported by the Police Department or V~4&T.
2. Street lights should be limited to "Tee". (T) or "Cross" (+) intersections.
3. Street lights are to be limited to State or CDuaty right-of-way.
4. Light requests mast be signed by four (4) or more residents.
5. A majority of the homeowners living at the proposed location must approve in writing (signature
on a post card, letter or petition).
If the location is inside a subdivision with undergrOnnd utilities and no other street lights
presently exist inside the subdivision, then the written reqUest of their Civic Association,
if any, shall be required.
If the light meets the above criteria, but the installation cost exceeds the cost benefit ratio
in existence at that time, then the applicants and/or association, shall bear the additional
cost of installation.
The Plarming Commission shall consider requiring developers to install street lights at inter-
sections which can be expected to be hazardous due to physical characteristics and/or traffic.
Special attention should be given to intersections or arterial streets.
9. The Department of Cc~ll~Jnity Developmmnt Envirormental F~ngineering Division shall administer
this policy.
10. %his policy shall be effective upon adoption by the Board of Supervisors.
11.
It is the intent of the Board that this policy merely serve as a guideline as to whether or
not a specific street light request should be apo. roved. This policy does not provide rules
which shall be conclusive as to the location of street lights.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
Mr. M~Elfish presents the Board with copies of the Bellwood Drainage Study as prepared by Brenner,
Yo~ngblood and King, Inc. He reviews the study and asks that the Board accept this report which
will not c~m,~t the Couaty to any action but would allow total payment for this ~rk. After con-
sideration of this matter, it is on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mrs. Gi~one, resolved that
the Bellwood Drainage Study prepared by Br~mer, Youngblood and King, Inc. be accepted.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
Mr. Apperson infonns the Board that there is a problem regarding King Forest with one of the prop-
erty owners but they will be meeting to try to resolve this matter in the near future.
Mr. 7ook is present to discuss the General Plan 2000. He states he was a little disappointed more
people did not come to the meeting on Jtme 20th in support of this plan, but since hundreds of
copies were sent out to various organizations, etc., he could only surmise that County residents
are in concurrence with the plan or have no mjor objections to it. He adds the goals and policies
should serve the County very well but the plan will be reviewed every 3-4 years for any updating
that may be necessary. Mr. Dodd conmends the Conmmity Development Department for a job well done
and adds that he would like that portion of the map indicating open land north of Mmadowville Road
sho~n as heavy industrial zoning. Mr. Zook states it can be amended to show this change.
Mr. John Smith states he would like to see a change on the map of his land which is zormd comnercia
to a certain depth and should be expanded further backward. Mrs. Girone states this map is general
in nature and his problem is a zoning matter which is not the matter before discussion at this time
Mr. Smith states he does not feel that Midlothian District was properly represented on this matter.
Mrs. Girone states she had two meetings; the first, at which time this was presented, and at the
second, the citizens were given time for questions, etc. and she is totally satisfied that Midlo-
thian District was represented.
Mr. Smith states the proposed resolution states the Planning OaL~L~ssion will be obligated .to abide
by this plan but the Board of Supervisors will not. Mrs. Girone states the Planning Comnission is
advisory in nature and they will use this as a major planning tool. She adds this is a guidelinm
and.is not set in concrete. The Asst. County Attorney states that the plan serves as a guideline
for the Board and the Planning Commission and neither are obligated to follow it. Mrs. Elmore
states she feels the people in the County want to know what is plamed in different areas and what
they can expect to develop. She adds this General Plan 2000 will provide them with this informati~
and rec~rmends approval.
Mr. Dodd states he agrees with the plan but property is still owned by individuals and if zoning
requests do not damage adjacent nei~bors, they will be favorably considered. Mr. Apperson states
a Cozmty master plan is a necessary part of how goveroments are set up and if we don't have one,
the people will remain confused on ~ifferent issues and where we intend to go. He adds that the
public would like to believe there will be no changes but every zoning case will be an amenclnent
to the plan. There being no further discussion of the matter, it is on motion of Mrs. Girone,
seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that the following resolution be and it hereby is adopted:
Whereas, Title 15.1, Chapter 11, Article 4, of the Code of Virginia provides for preparation
of a comprehensive plan by all Virginia localities by July 1, 1980; and
Whereas, the present Chesterfield General Plan 1995 Transportation Land Use and ComLL~r~ity
Facilities was adopted October 25, 1972, and must be reviewed within five years of its adoption;
and
Whereas, the Planning Conrmission has reviewed the Chesterfield General Plan 2000 Report,
hereinafter referred to as the Plan; and have recomnended approval thereof; and
Whereas, the Board of Supervisors has reviewed and considered the Plan;
Now, Therefore, This Board resolves that the Plan be approved as amended and adopted with
the following statements of conditions and policies:
The Plan is to be considered as the basic planning docunent for Chesterfield County.
The Policy guidance is to come from ~hesterfield General Plan 2000 Land Use and Public
Facilities (a map of 1" = 4,000' Scale) and Chapter VI in the Chesterfield General Plan
2000.
B. The Plan is intended to be general in nature; specific location.; actual character and
extent of uses are not intended to be shown thereon.
Do
The designation of public facilities and uses on the Plan is an emoression of intent by
the County to establish the facilities, although the expressed location is germral (as
sh~n thereon) and scheduling of public land acquisition or improvement is advisory only.
The designation of private uses is general and advisory only and does not obligate the
County to provide public facilities or utilities to any property or to include any prop-
erty in any particular zoning district in accordance with the Plan; nor does the Plan
prevent the County from including any property in any particular zoning district which
is not in accordance with the Plan.
Ayes:
go
The Plan is not intended to be a Zoning Ordinmnce, but is intended to be a comprehensive
guideline for the Zoning Ordinance and arm~n~ts thereto. The Board of Supervisors is
not obligated to follow this Plan in their regular decisions to amend the Zoning Ordinanc
and likewise, the Plan should not be relied upon as the only justification for, or
against, zoning applications.
The Planning Conmission should begin a review of this Plan in 1979, or sooner, to provide
the Board with reconnmndations thereon within three years of the effective date of' this
resolution but the Plan shall be considered amendable at any tinm.
Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
Mr. William Moseley of Moseley-Hening presents the Board with bids received for the site prepara-
tion work for the Juvenile and Dommstic Relations Court and Probation Building. He states the
estimate was approximately $90,000 and the low bid is $49,700 which they are reconnmnding for
acceptance. After consideration of the matter, it is on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr.
Dodd, resolved that the bid of Heindl-Evans, Inc. in the a~ount of $4~9,700 be and it hereby is
accepted for site preparation and be it fozther resolved that notice to proceed be forwarded to
said company.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
Mr. Moselay presents the desiEa development drawing and color elevation sketch for the Juvenile and
Mr. Manuel states he has received a letter from Moseley-~enin~ stating their dssire to help resolw
the probl~n regarding the additional cost by Schnabel Engineerir~ Associates in the anoint of $375
to gO through the lake s~d sro~md the lake. H~ s~at~s going throu~a the lake ~ill ~ost about
There was s¢¢~ discussion regsrdi~ possible effects on the lake and if the owners w~re aware of
m~tmt of $3,145.70 with the ~n~erstsnding that all adjacent property owners understand the line
%he (~esterfield Cot~ty Fire M~rshal or his assistants, appointed pu~u~mt to ~27-36 of the
It is on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, re$olvad that Sgt, Floyd E. Clark be and
"An Ordinance to anmmd,,Section 28,3~.of.- tt~e*Zoning Ordinance. of the Comte Qf the Oounty of
Chesterfi_e._ld, 1975, as amended, relating '~o Fees for Multi-Family and TW°:Family Dwellings."
BE IT ORI~INED by the Board of Supervisors of the Co~mty of Chesterfield:
(1) %hat §28-3 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Code of the County of Chesterfield is amended
as follows:
Section 28-3 Fees.
%he cost of each hearing, including advertisement when required, shall make a deposit simul-
taneously with ~the filing of his application or petition of the sun applicable as follc~s, which
sun shall be deemed to be the cost of such hearing:
(1) Zoning
(a) Agricultu=al (A) ............................................. $100.00
(b) Rmsidential (R-40, R-25, R-15, R-12, R-9, R-7) .... ~ .......... $100.00 plus $1.00 per acre
(R-%H, H-l, ..M{-2) ............................... $300.00 plus $1.00 per acre
(c) Comnercial ................................................... $150.00 plus $20. O0 per
(d) Industrial ................................................... $150.00 plus $20.00 per
(2) Conditional Uses and SpeCial Exceptions
(a) Maltiple family or two family ................................. $150.00 plus $7.00 per unit
for each unit after the
first two traits
(b) Mobile Hor~s ................................................... $ 50.00
(c) Planned Development ............................................ $200.00
(d) All Other ...................................................... $ 75.00
(3) Variances ........ , .................................................. $ 50.00
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
It is on motion of Mr, Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that this Board go into
Session to discuss a prospective business in the County where no public announcement has been made
of the business's interest and for personneli
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
77S060
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Calcourt Properties, Inc. request rezoning from Agricultural
(a) to Residential (R-7) of a 36.3 acre parcel fronting approximately 2,350 feet on Newby's Bridge
Road and located approximately 1,100 feet north of its intersection with Millvale Road (in Glen
Wood Subdivision). Tax Map 50-4 (1) 9 (Sheet 14).
Mr. Cal Seay, representing Calcourt Properties, Inc. is present and states they agree to the R-9
moning as reconmmnded by the Planning Conndssion. Mr. Lee Coleman. states he and his neighborJ do
not object to .the R-9 zoning but they would like a buffer. Mr. Bookman states there is a roadway
currently in existance that would act as a buffer but this matter should be discussed by the Plan-
ning Co~'mLission as to the layout, etc. After further consideration of the matter, it is on motion
of Mr. Bookman, seconded bY Mr. Apperson, resolved that this rezoning request be approved for Resi-
dential (R~9).
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman JndMr. Dodd.
77S064
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Robert E. Dunnington amd J. Sherwood Strum request rezoning
from Rmsidential (R-15) to Office Business (O) of approximately a one acre parcel fronting 200
feet on Forest Hill Avenue and located approximately 500 feet east of its intersection with %hurloe
Drive. Tax Map 10-7 (1) 2 (Sheet 3).
Mr. Strun is present and states they did have to situate the building differently on the lot but
they do agree to the oonditions recou~nded by the Planning Co~ission. %here being no opposition
to this request, it is on motion Of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that this request
be and it hereby is approved subject to the conditions rec~mmnded by the Planning Ccnntission.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Gironm, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
77S089
In Bermuda Magisterial District, T. S', Winston, III, requests rezoning from Agricultural (A) to
Bmsidential (R-7) of a 23.77 acre parcel fronting 180 feet on ~hester Road located approximately
2,000 feet north of its intersection with West H~mdred Road. T. M. 115-3 (1) 7 & 8' (Sheet 32).
Ms. Emily Couse is pre~ent ~nd states she feels~ there will be a drainage problem greater than the
one that currently, exists with tm-off coming onto her property from hi~ and whal he may have to
do to accomplish this may help her present situation. He states someone from the OaL~nity Develop
nmnt D~par~nent will call and talk with her about this situation. Mr. Winston states he will
agree with the reoomnendation of the Planning C~,,dssion that this parcel be zoned R-9. Tmere
being no opposition, it is on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs ,~ Girone, resolved that this
request for remoning be approved to Residential (R-9).
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman ~nd Mr. Dodd.
77S090
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Roland S. Rodwell requasts rezoning from Agricultural (A) to
Residential (R-7) Of ~a 16.8 acre parcel fronting approximately 800 feet on Adkins Road located
approximately 370 feet southwest of its intersection with Reams Road. T.M. Sec. 27-12 (1) 6
(Sheet 8).
Mr. Kenneth Barden, representing Roland S. Rock~ell, is present. Mrs. Maria. Avent of Kendrick Road
states she would rather not see any development in the area but if it has to be, that she would
rather see a different zoning which would allow less homes to be constructed. Mr. Bookman states
that if R-7 were granted/ the homes mud lot sizes would be compatible. %here being no further
discussion of the matter, it is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Dodd, resolved that this
request for Residential (R-7) be and it hereby is approved.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman mud Mr. Dodd.
77S093
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Joseph F. I_nman, Jr. requests rezoning from Agricultural (A)
to Residential (R-12) of a 324 acre parcel located approximately 600 feet off the north line of
Jacobs Road, measured from a point approximately 1,300 feet west of the intersection of.Jacobs
Road and Newby's Bridge Road. Tax Map 50-6 (1) and 50-10 (1) 1 (Sheet 14).
Mrs. Robert Sunnerville of Falling Creek Farms presents a petition signed by residents of the area
who are opposed to this rezoning request. She states they have no objection to the rezoning but
they do not want to have additional traffic on already crowded streets, the haJardous intersection
coming onto Route 360 would be worse than presently exists, etc. Mr. Jim Hayes states there are
nunerous stub roads leading from this subdivision not only there, this development v~uld be com-
pleted in phases and over a period of 10 years, there would be 30-35 homes in each phase, 275 acrea
would be developed because 50 acres are in the flood plain, mud the reason why they are beginning
in this area is because water and sewer lines come to this point.
Mr. Robert Morris states the traffic at the bottom of the hill on Route 360 will be unbearable and
further that no one would use Newby's Bridge Road even if there is an access there. He adds fur-
ther the pool in the area draws traffic out of the subdivision and this new subdivision will add
even .more. Mr. Bookman states the streets, layout, etc. will be addressed at the Planning Oamis-
sion.
After further consideration of this rotter, it is on motion of Mr. Bookman, seconded by Mr. Dodd,
resolved that this request for R-12 rezoning be and it hereby is approved.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
Mr. Bookman states he is on the Planning Conmission and he is aware of the people's concern and
will try to address these problems when the Planning Conmission hears this case.
77S092
In Midlothian Magisterial District, J. K. Timmns and Associates, Inc. requests rezoning from
Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-9) of a 62.8 acre parcel fronting approximately 230 feet on
Old Buckingh~nn Road, located approximately 1,700 feet southwest of its intersection with Olde
Coalmine Road. Tax Map 16-2 (1) 2 (Sheet 7). .~
Mr. John Henson presents, the Board with a proposed sketch of the mixture of Residential (R-9),
(R-12) and (R-15) that is proposed for the area. Mr. Jim Rice, representing the Olde Coach
Village Subdivision, states they are opposed to this request because the entrance to the sub-
division will be at the bridge which is very dangerous, there are 700 cars which travel this road
daily and that will be increased by 350 more, the railroad rums behind some of the hc~es which is
not very good, heavy trucks will be trageling up and down Olde Buckinghan Road at increased rates
of speed, etc. He adds that if this is rezoned, the residents in the area would like it to be
Ral5 so that it would be compatible with what exist. He adds further that the children in the
area do not have any place to play except the streets and presents a petition signed by 96 resi-
dents requesfing the R-15 if approval were to be granted.
Mrs. Girone states she has talked with Mr. Covington of the Highway Departmmnt and he has stated
01de Buckingham Road will be resurfaced before this development is constructed, they will move
the ditch lines back and improve the shoulders in the future, that the Highway Department does
not feel the intersection by the bridge is very dangerous at this tir~, etc.
Mr. Rice inquires what assurance the people in the area have that the plan will be developed as
shown~ Mr. Balderson states that the ap. plicant is aware of the concern of ~the people in the area
and that the developer has entered into a faith mud understanding which the people would hold them
to. Mr. Rice inquires if it would be written in black and white. Mrs. Girone states the people
involved are dependable mud have a good reputation in the County. Mrs. Girone sites soma concern
over soil erosion, fire hydrants, fire protection, etc. which she is assured will be addressed
and taken care of.
~here being no further discussion of this matter, it is on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by
Mr. Apperson, resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved.
Ayes: Mr, O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and.Mr, Dodd.
Mm. Micas introduces Mr. Harry Frazier of Hunton, Williams, Gay m~d Gibson, who is bond counsel for
the sale of the $1,300,000 Nursing Home Bonds, Mr. Frazier explains the bond situation stating
that Central National Bank will be the purchaser of the Bonds at 6.78% interest. He distributes
copies of the proposed bond resolution for the Board's perusal. He adds they should be ready to
come back before the Board at its adjourned meeting on J~me 29th at 2:00 p.m.
77S094
In Dmle Magisterial District, Rook Construction Company requests rezoning from Agricultural (A)
to Rmsidential (R-15) of a 52.1 acre parcel fronting 743.38 feet on Crunpland Road, located approxi
mately 1,900 feet northeast of its intersection with Qualla Road. Tax Map 93 (1) 8 (Sheet 30).
~he applicant is not present. Mr. Balderson states it is his ~nderstanding that the applicant will
be requesting a deferral from the Planning Conmission. An adjacent property owner is present and
questions the property lines in the area. Mr. Balderson indicates this is one of the problemm the
applicant is facing. %here being no further discussion of the matter, it is on motion of Mr.
Apperson, seconded by Mrs. Girone, resolved that this request be and it hereby is deferred until
August 24th. ~
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
77S095
In MatoacaMagisterial District, J. K. Tin, ns and Associates, Inc. requests rezoning from Resi-
dential (R-7) to Convenience Business (B-l) of a 0.40 acre parcel fronting 100.01 feet on Harrow-
gate Road fronting approximately 200 feet on South Street, located in the northeast quadrant of
the intersection of these roads. Tax Map 163-1 (3) 38ASeary, Sec. 3, Blk. B, lot 38A (Sheet49).
Mr. John Henson states the Highway Department wanted two aCcesses to this parcel, one on South
Street and the other on Harrowgate Road. Mr. Balderson states the Planming Conmission and plannin~
staff are concerned about strip zoning north to the school. Mr. O'Neill states he is not opposed
to the zoning but is concerned with the use of the land. After considerable discussion with the
applicant, it is on motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Appersonj resolved that this request be
end it hereby is approved subject to the conditions recomnended by the Planning Staff as amended
and with the ~tmderstanding the building will be located to front on South Street.
Ayes: Mr~ O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman andMr. Dodd.
77S098
In Bezmuda MagiSterial District, Central Contracting Company requests a Conditional Use to pennit
the operation of an Asphalt Plant in a Heavy Industrial ~-3) District on a 3.5 acre parcel, par~
of a 60 acre parcel located approximately 2,000 feet east of the eastern terminus of Willis Road.
Tax Mmp 82-8 (1) 1 (Sheet 23).
Mr. Frank Cowin, representing Central Contracting Company, states th~7 are agreeable to conditions
recommended by the Planning Oal~dssion. Mr. Todd Lunar, representing Brown Boveria, states his
company just received notice of this rezoning case, they own heavy electrical equipment which
could be damaged by particles floating in the air, and requests a 30 day deferral. Mr. Dodd states
there are considerable safeguards incorporated into the requirements and they are also going to
have to meet EPA requirements. After further consideration of this rotter, it is on motion of
Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved, that this request be and it. hereby is approved subject
to the conditions recc~mnended by the Planning Cor~ssion.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
77S099'
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Parker and Lancaster Corporation, Inc. requests a conditional
use to pennit an office building and the inside storage of building materials in an Agricultural
(A) District on a 4.19 acre parcel located at the southern terminus of Grove Road. Tax Map 16-16
(1) 3 (sheet 7).
%here being no opposition, it is on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that
this requmst be and it hereby is approved subject to the conditions recomnended by the Planning
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. ~irorm, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Bookman.
77S100
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Myra A. Campbell requests an mnencknent to Condition #3 of a
rezoning case (Case #76-S047) to allow the use of the buffer area in an Office Business (0) Dis-
trict on a 2.87 acre parcel, fronting 243.3 feet on Robious Road, fronting 559.1 feet on Bon Air
Road, located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of these roads. Tax Map 17-8 (1) 10
(sheet 8).
Mr. Balderson states the applicant has requested a 30 day deferral. It is on motion of Mrs. Girone
seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that the request for a 30 day deferral be and it hereby is
approved.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Bookman.
77S102
In Bennuda!~isterial District, Landmark Builders, Inc. requests a conditional use to permit the
operation of a Contractor's Shop and Storage Yard in an Agricultural (A) District on part of a
one acre~parcel fronting approximately 130 feet on Rock }~11 D~ad, located appro~n~tely 950 feet
north of its intersection withP~st HondredRoad. Tax Map 116-6 (1) 4 (Sheet 32).
funds for the co.lng year as requested, he bas beea informed by the State that gh~ Co~O] will
not be funded as in che past which was a 50-50 match previously but may be re0~ced by a new
in the ~ of $17,604. These changes will be reflected in the appropriations which will be
It is on motion of }~. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dodd, rmsolved =be= che following erron~o0~
tax claJns be md they hereby are approved for pay~nt:
gd~rd H. Wilson, III Cowry Vehicle Linde $ 1L25
Constance L. Laboissiere Cot~ty Vehicla License 1.00
Terry W. Howard Co~y Vehilce Licerme 11.25
It is on r~tiom of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr, Apperson. resolved that $8~000 be comnitted from
the dr~/rmge fonds to repair Railroad Street ~n Bermuda District,
88