01-23-85 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
January 23, 1985
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr. G. H. Applegate, Chairman
Mr. Jesse J. Mayes, Vice Ckairman
Mr. Earry G. Daniel
Mr. R. Garland Dodd
Mrs. Joan Girone
Mr. Richard L. Hedriek
County Administrator
Staff in Attendance:
Mr. Stanley R. Balderson,
Dir. o£ Planning
Mr. Tom Callahan,
Airport Manager
Mr. Robert Galusha,
Personnel Dir.
~r. Elmer Hedge, Asst.
County Administrator
Mr. William Howell,~
Dir. o~ Gen. Services
Mr. Richard McElfish,
Dir. of Env. Eng.
Mr. R. J. McCracken,
Transp. Director
Mr. Steve Micas, Co.
Attorney
Mrs. Pauline Mitchell,
Dir. of News/Info.
Services
Mr. Jeffrey Muzzy,
Asst. Co. Admin. for
Community Develop.
~r. Lane Ramsey, Dir.
of Budget & Acctg.
Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr.,
Exeo. Asst., Co. Adm.
Mr. Devid Welchon~,
Dir. of Utilities
Mr. B. R. Wilkinson,
License Inspector
Kr. Applegate called the meeting to order at the Courthouse at
9:05 a.m. (EST).
INVOCATION
~r. Applegate introduced the Reverend Gerald R. Chancellor,
Pastor of Second Branch Baptist Church, who gave the i~vocation.
~.' APPROVAL OF MINUTES
ion motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
approved the minutes of January 9, 1985, as submitted.
Vote: Unanimous
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
Mr. Hedrick introduced Mr. Victor Dupont from Izaak Walton Park
who presented to the Board of SupErvisors a framed painting and a
print numbered 826 by nationally known wildlife artist, Maynard
Reece, entitled "Canadas Over The Chesapeake." Mr. Dupont stated
that the Izaak Walton League of America in its efforts to improve
wetlands and wildlife areas has undertaken to participate to
enhance the quality of the Chesapeake Bay. He stated this
painting is presented to the Board in appreciation for the
County's efforts over the past several year~ in helping with
conservation and preservation of the Chesapeake Bay.
85-030
Mr. Applegate accepted the painting on behalf of the Board and
expressed thanks to the League.
Mr. Daniel noted that for several years he has requested an
organized place at the Courthouse where award~ and presentations
to the Board such as this can be displayed for the pubtio.
Mrs. Girone thanked Mr. Dupont and the Izaak Walton League of
America for being exceptional to work with and for their long
tenure in the County.
4. BOARD COMMITTEE P~EPORT$
Mrs. Girone reported On her meeting with the Richmond Regional
Planninq District Commission. She stated they had been looking at
the small business loan programs, S.B.A. 503, and after trying
for some time to find a location for it, they are hoping for a
sponsorship hy the Chamber of Commerce. She crated the meeting
on January 17, 1985 at the John Marshall Hotel was attended by
all Virginia's Planning District Co~uuiseions to review the report
of the Governor's Commission on Virginia's future, to hear
Governor ~olton and several members of the General Assembly speak
along with other speakers. She stated it was very interesting to
look at the Governor's report on the choices for Virginians Over
the next twenty years and to evaluate the report from several
perspectives, she pointed out that the report included a
suggestion that more money was needed for roads in the State of
Virginia. She left the Board with the thought that they might
like to appoint a citizens commission to talk about the future of
Chesterfield.
Mrs. Girone reported there was no MPC meeting. She stated the
Administrative Committee of MPC will meet before the February,
1985 meeting to discuss better attendance by elected people.
Mrs. Girone reported the VACO Executive Board met January 17,
1985 at the John Marshall and recommended that the 1985 meeting
he held at the Homestead with bids being taken for the 1986
meeting since there are a number of new convention centers in the
State.
Mrs. Girone reported the Maymont Board will be going into a fund
raising effort and she would like to work in Chesterfield to make
the businesses and general community aware of the value of
Maymont Park. She stated even though surrounding jurisdictions
and private businesses support Maymont, it is very expensive to
operate and more money is needed.
Mr. Daniel made reference to the blue ribbon planning commission
which would address the future Of the County and stated he
supported Mrs. Girene in this effort and a~ked the Board to
seriously consider this.
Mr. Daniel ~tated the Board had appointed him to the Magnolia
:Grange Task Force at the January 9, 1985 ~card meeting, and he
had met with the Historical Society regarding Magnolia Grange.
He stated they had drafted a report and hoped tO have it on the
Board agenda at the February 13, 1985 meeting.
~Lr. Dodd reported the Capital Region Airport Co~mmission is
getting ready for bids and he will probably have a report on the
expansion at Byrd Airport at the February 13, 1985 meeting.
Mr. Applegate reported on the C~pital Area Training Consortium
which deals with seven surrounding counties and the City of
Richmond. He stated due to cutbacks in federal spending it
appears that ChesterfieLd's potential contribution to this
program will vary from $34,008 to $55,000 in the ensuing year.
He ~tated that M~. Masden will have a Board paper regarding this
issue to present at the February 13, 1985 Board meeting.
85-031
Mr. Mayes reported On a meeting he had this morning, January 23,
1985~ with Data Processing and Mr. Muzzy. He reported that
progress is on schedule for the Data Processing building. Mr.
Daniel stated that as a member o£ this committee he had met with
the committee on January 22, 1985 and concurred with Mr. Mayes'
statement.
REQUESTS TO POSTPONE ACTION, EMERGENCY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES
IN THE ORDER OF PRESENTATION
{r. Daniel stated that in regard to 10.C.1., Requests for Bingo
~nd/or Raffle Permits, he would like tO add an application
:equesting a raffle permit from Virginia citizens Bank
Iommunicators, Inc.
{rs. Girone stated that Delegate John Watkins had requested that
:he Board consider a resolution granting tax exemption for WCV~-
~V from local real estate taxes. She stated that Delegate
~atkins had introduced the bill to the General Assembly on
~anuary 22, 1985, and that the governing body's resolution of
~upport is a legal requirement.
ar. Micas stated that technically the Soard would not be granting
:ax exemption but would be asking our General Assembly delegation
:o sponsor legislation that would change the state law to provide
:ax exemption for WCVB-TV.
ar. Micas stated that since Mrs. Birone requested that this item
>e next on the agenda, this item would be 6.A. under item 6.,
{esolutions of Special Recognition, and the other three
:esolutions would become 6.B., 6.C. and 6.D.
{r. Hedrick stated that 10.E.4.b., Contract for Installation of
later Lines for Ashley Grove, Section D, was to be deleted.
)n motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board added
~nder 10.C., Consent Items, a request for a raffle permit from
~irginia Citizens Bank Communicators, Inc. because of the
~mergency nature of the item; added under 6., Resolutions of
;peoial Recognition, a resolution requesting the General Assembly
~o seek legislation which would provide tax exemption for WCVE-TV
~s 6.A. because of the emergency nature of the issue, making the
~ther three resolutions as 6.B., 6.C. and 6.D.; deleted
.0.E.4.b., Contract for Installation of Water Lines for Ashley
~rove, Section D, and adopted the agenda as amended.
~ote: Unanimous
RESOLUTIONS OF SPECIAL RECOGNITION
8.A. I~ESOLUTION ON TAXARILITY OF WCVE-TV
~r. Micas gave an overview to the Board of the WCVE-TV report
regarding an exemption from any local taxes, past or future.
~r. Daniel suggested that the words "a non-profit corporation" be
inserted in the resolution following. Central Virginia Educational
~elevision Corporation.
~pon motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Mayes, be it resolved
that upon examination and consideration of the provisions of
~58.1-36~0 and §30-19.04B of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
~mended, the Board of Supervisors finds that Central Virginia
~ducational Television Corporation, a non-profit corporation, is
)perated exclusively for cultural purposes and requests the
~eneral Assembly representatives for Chesterfield County to seek
legislation granting exemption from local real estate taxes for
85-032
all real estate owned by the Central Virginia Educational
Television Corporation.
Vote: Unanimous
6.B. DONALD E. ADDISON, UTILITIES D~PARTMENT
Mr. Galusha introduced Hr. Welchons. Mr. Welchons presented Mr.
Don Addison and gave his educational background and outlined his
dedicated and loyal service to the Utilities Department.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
~R~AS, Mr. Donald E. Addison, Sr. will retire from the
Department of Utilities, Chesterfield County, On February 1,
1985; and
WI~EP~EAS, Mr. Addison, as Superintendent of Water Plant Opera-
tions, has been a faithful and dedicated employee of Chesterfield
County since January, 1965; and
W~EI~EAS, Through Mr. Addison's efforts, the reliability of
Chesterfield County's treatment facilities and the quality of the
staff are recognized as superior by the State requlatory
agencies; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Addison's twenty years of selfle~ dedication to the
citizens of Chesterfield County will be missed by Chesterfield
County and the Board of Supervisors.
NOW, THEREFOP~, BE IT ~%~SOLVED that this Board of Supervisors
publicly recognizes Mr. Addison's faithful and dedicated service
and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens cf
Chesterfield County their appreciation for his service to the
County and wishes him a long and happy retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be
9re~ented to Mr. Addison and that this Resolution be permanently
recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors 9f
Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. ~edrick pressn=ed Hr. Addison with the executed resolution.
6.C. MARVIN D. PHILLIPS~..LICHNSE INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
Mr. Calusha introduced Mr. B. R. Wilkinson, License Inspector.
~r. Wilkinson introduced Mr. Phillips, gave a brief outline of
his profession=l experience and expressed his thanks for the
~umpassion and dedication with which he had served.
Dn motion of tho ~oard, the following resolution was adopted:
~HEREAS, Mr. Marvin D. Phillips will retire from the License
Inspections Department, Chesterfield County, o~ January 31, 1985;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Phillips has provided almost ten years of quality
service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
W~EREAS, Chesterfield County an~ the Board of Supa~vi~ors will
miss Mr. Phillips' diligent service.
NOW, THEt~EFOILE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Board of Supervisors
publicly recognize~ Mr. ~hillips and extends on behalf of its
me,bors and the citizens of Chesterfield County their
appreciation for his service to the County.
85-033
AND, BE ~T FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be
presented to Mr. Phillips and that this Resolution be p~rmanently
recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Hedrick presented Mr. Phillips with the executed resolution.
6.D. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY EMPLOYEE OF TH~ Y~AR, 1984
Mr. Galusha stated that when Mr. Melvin Eurnett retired as County
Administrator he established a fund for the purpose of
recognizing outstanding performance of service by County
~mployee~. Se explained the established criteria and the method
Df selection of the Employee-of-the-Year. Be introduced MS.
Janet R. Baumgardner, Library Services; Ms. Marian T. Blunt,
~reasurer's Office; Sergeant James P. Scurque, Police Depar~ent;
Ms. Frances Q. Cole, Real Estate Assessments; Ms. Pose G.
Qundalow, Lucy Corr Nursing Home; Mr. Michael S. Qolden, Parks
and Recreation; Ms. Sally K. Hire, Planning Department; Ms.
Elizabeth W. Kilbourne, M~/MR Services; Mr. Phillip D. Mitchell,
Purchasing Department; Ms. Lana A. Roach, Budget and Management;
Zr. Leon C. Ruskell, Utilities; and Ms. Eloise B. Thweatt,
~eneral Services, who were nominated for the
employes-cf-the-Year. Mr. Hedrlck congratulated all those
~ominated and expressed to them that they were the "cream of the
=rop" of .Chesterfield County during 1984. ~e presented Ms. Sally
K. Hits with a framed resolution, a silver engraved Revere bowl,
~ $50 savings bond and the reserved parking space at the entrance
Df the Administration Building.
Dn the motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
~HEREAS, MS. Sally K. Hits, Department of Planning, has
~istingui~hed herself by consistently demonstrating an
~xceptional degree of loyal and dedicated service to Chesterfield
~ounty; and
~HEREAS, This loyalty and dedication by service has been such as
~o warrant special recognition by her fellow employees; and
~HEREAS, ~er singular contribution of talents and expertls~ to
[mprove the effectiveness and efficiency of her department has
)sen of such significance as to have brought distinct credit not
5nly upon herself but her department and the County Government as
~ell; and
~HEREAS, By her sel~etlon as the recipient of the Chesterfield
~ounty Employee-Of-The-Year Award, she has been recognized by her
~eers to be the employees' employee.
IOW, TEEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors
hereby recognizes this loyal and dedicated service hy fellow
employee Ms. Sally K. Hits, by naming her the Chesterfield County
Employee-Of-The-Year for 1984.
~ote: Unanimous
7. HEARINGS 0~ CITIZENS ON UNSCHEDULED MATTERS OR CLAIMS
MR. JOHN SMITE REGARDING HIGHWAY AND TP~AFFIC FLOW STUDIES
Mr. Smith stated he proposed to begin where he had stopped with
his presentation at the Board meeting of January 9, 1985. He
displayed a schematic showing the area involved in the Powhite
Interchange public hearing that went before the Virginia
Department of Highways and Transportation. He stated that the
proposal contained a complete cloverleaf. He stated prior to
that, the VDH&T had concedad that the Route 288 corridor would
8S-034
not be built fnrther north On the existing right-of-way and
isubsequent to this time, %he Board had authorized construction
within Route 288 north. ~e stated the public hearinq plan was
ilimited in what it would do for the travelling public since it
idid not furnish movement of traffic from west to south nor did it
provide for the movement of traffic from south to west.
stated, additionally, the line of survey physically is the
poorest possible place to construct a road in the entire area and
since we are concerned with traffic travelling east, south and
west, they had developed a pistol flyover which provides for a
full movement of the traffic which takes about half as many
bridges (overpasses) as the public hearing proposal would take
for a full cloverleaf in that it shortens most areas of travel.
He stated that in 1980, at tko time some of Mr. Matyiko's
property in this area was zoned by the Board, they had full
access f~om St. Ledger's Squar~ property to Coalfield Road and
that they donated a 10 ft wide strip on either side of the road
at the points where the property was zoned. He stated that the
land that was given to the UDR&~ was used to construct extra
lanes. He stated their deeign would meet all technical
requirements and he hoped it would meet all political
requirements, and it would use 45% less land with the flyover.
He stated that when travelling west of Coalfield Road, this
pistol flyover crossed Coalfield Road at about 400 to 450 feet
north and converged at Old Hundred Road at the original survey
line. Ee said this area was selected in 1974 since it was the
highest point and easy to provide for drainage. Be stated his
proposed plan would use 40 ac~es as opposed to 120 acres. He
stated that this zoning would be very expensive to the County if
they decided to go with the original construction plan.
stated that in the resolution to the VDH&~, the County stated
that they reserve for themselves a possible change in design in
the area he is discussing.
Mr. Dodd asked Mr. Smith if the flyover scheme against the normal
~loverleaf scheme dealt with Coalfield Road. He stated he felt
Mr. Smith should pressnt his plan with the pistol flyover to the
VDH&T and that Mr. Smith needs to address the problem of
Coalfield Road of how to come off the flyover, etc.
Mr. Smith stated that the resolution that went to the VDH&T from
the County provided for a change of design at Coalfield Road. Be
stated prior to the resolution being passed by the VDH&T
lauthorizing the location for Route 76, he and Mr. Matyiko were
itold by the Chief of Location and Design of the VDH&T that the
change they were reguesting was a change of desiqn not a change
of location. He stated they have discussed this from time
time and have been told that the VDH&T was relying On the advic~
they receive through the Chesterfield County Administration. Be
stated that are applying to the VDH&T to have their plan
reviewed. ~e referred to the Kellerco Plan which they would like
to review and might like tc incorporate some of it into their
plan. He stated the treatment of Coalfield Road would be subject
to decision by the Board and the VDH&T. ~e stated his plan would
work with Coalfield Road closed or opened; however, he felt to
close Coalfield Road and push the entranee as far west as has
been discussed would be reduein~ the number of toll people who
use Coalfield Rd.
~r. Applegate asked Mr. Micas if the County a~d/or VDH&T had set
up a mechanism for interested parties to make changes in the
proposed plan.
Mr. Micas stated the Board had ~pproved a concept whereby any
property owners affected by Powhite can enter into an agreement
between ths County in which they can design various forms of
access to serve their property of which Mr. Smith has a copy. He
stated other developers have used this mechanism to design
various access plans to their parcels that are in the Powhite
corridor and Mr. Smith can also do the same.
85-035
Mr. Muzzy stated the final meeting with the consultants had been
held last week and he would be in touch with Mr. Smith and Mr.
Matiyko next week.
Mr. Daniel wanted to know the next step to be taken after
discussing the proposal with the property owners in the P0white
corridor.
Mr. Mussy said the next step would be workinq with the VDH&T and
having them review the plans that the consultants had developed,
and that concurrently with this Mr. Smith would be going through
a similar process to have his plans considered. Be stated the
Powhite Expansion was continuing on schedule.
8. DEFERRED ITEMS
8.A. STORER CABL~VISION'S REQUEST FOR EAT~ INCREASE
Mr. Eodge stated this item had been deferred from the January 9,
1985 Board meeting to give Storer Cable sufficient time to get
additional information to the County regarding return on
investment, their plans for increases in fees fo~ pay services
and balance sheet for Chesterfield Storer Cable. Be stated
County staff has reviewed this material and has given
rec0m~endations to the Board. Be stated staff would like to be
given additional time to get audited information from Storer for
them to review as well as allow time for Storer to improve their
services. Be pointed Out to the Board that if the Board does not
approve the 10% increase that Storer is allowed to go with a 5%
increase by Federal legislation recently enacted. He stated that
staff does not recommend that Storer ge beyond the initial 5%
increase if the Board allows staff additional time to review
audited material, and stated staff would ask Storer not to
increase their fees until after the a~dited material had been
reviewed.
Mr. Applegate stated that a public hearing had already been held
and the matter was now before the Board.
Mr. MacNeilly stated that Channel 27 would be restored to
cablevi~ion as soon as channel capacity is available.
Hr. Kedge stated he would like the ~oard to defer action on this
Ratter for 90 days which would give Storer time to resolve some
~xisting situations such as channel 27 and telephone calls, and
would give staff time to review audited information which may
require enlisting Outside help. Ne stated he would like for
Starer to delay any increase until after these matters are
resolved. Mr. MacNeilly stated %hey were agreeable to the 90 day
deferral but they would have to study the issue as to whether or
~ot to increase the rates 5% before that time. Mr. Daniel
suggested that they wait the 90 days.
~r. Daniel stated he had r~ceived about a 100 telephone calls
~egarding cablevision. Be questioned Mr. MacNeilly regarding the
!telephone rollover mechanism, the cable system keeping up with
~technology, the mechanism for handling VC~ programming and the
rate of return. Ha gave a history of our County's cable
ordinance.
Mr. Wayne 0'Dell, area Vies President and General Manager of
Storer Cable, stated he would consider this as he would like to
~iscuss this matter with his company b~fore he could pledge
deferring the matter. Ne stated, however, ha felt if the 5%
increase would have an adverse effect on th~ relationship of the
Company and the County, he was certain they wo~ld not as that
relationship is valued hiqhly.
Mrs. Girone stated she had reoelved over 100 telephone calls
regarding Storer Cable. She stated Storer has installed about
31,000 connections and should now turn their attention toward
service. She asked Mr. 0'Dell if they could change their method
85-036
of operating here in regard to taking care of citizen service
problems.
Mr. O'Dell assured the Board that etorer is addressing the issue
oi service to its customers.
Mr. Mayas stated his calls from citizens indicated they did not
want Storer Cable to receive an increase. He stated he felt a 90
day deferral would qive the Board a chance to reassure the
consumer and would be in the best interest of Storer Cable. Mr.
Dodd stated he felt Storer Cable should use better business
practices to get better profits. He stated further unless
something very constructive was shown to him, he would not be
able to vote for the increase.
Mr. Applegate pointed out that a federal deregulation on July 1,
1985 would grant cablevieion less control by the Board of
Supervisors. He stated he could foresee another increase after
th~s deregulation. Mr. Daniel asked additional questions
regarding the rate of return, etc.
~Ir. Rick Rolandea, Regional Business Manager addressed Mr.
Daniel's concern of the accounting approaches used by storer
Cable.
On mot$on of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board
deferred until April 24, 1985 further censlderatien of the
request from Sto~er Cable for a 10% rate increase to allow staff
time to review audited finaneial$ of the company and to allow the
company to improve their services.
Vote: Unanimous
8.R. APPOINTMENTS
8.B.1. CITIZENS' TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
On motion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by ~r. Daniel, the Board
withdrew the name of ~ir. William F. Harria as a nominee to the
Citizens' Transportation Advisory Co~u~ittee (CTACl.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mrs. Gircne, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
withdrew the name of Ms. Geraldine Fineberg as a nominee to the
Citizens' Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC).
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
appointed the following people to the Citizens' Transportation
Advisory Committee (CTAC), whose te~ms are effective immediately
and will expire on December 31, 1986:
Mr. J. Ruffin Apperson
Mr. Cecil R. ~axson, Jr.
Or. Nell J. Humphries
Ms. Elaine ~ubin
Vote: Unanimous
8'.B.2. MBO AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTR
Dn motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
appointed Mrs. Girone and Mr. R. John MoCracken to the MBO Air
~uality Technical Committee, whose terms are effective
immediately for an undesignated period of time.
~ote: Unanimous
85-037
~.B.3. BOARD OF BUILDING APPEALS FOR VIRGINIA UNIFORM STATEWIDE
BUILDING CODE
~n motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr.'Dodd, the Board
~eappointed Mr. David L. Carr, representing Midlothian District,
and Mr. Gerald Speeks, representing Clover Hill District, to the
~oard of Building Appeals for Virginia Uniform Stafewide Building
lode, whose terms a~e effective immediately and would expire on
Inly 31, 1988.
~.B.4. RICHMOND REGIONAL WATER R~$OURCES TASK FORCE
motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
~ppointud Mrs. Joan Girone as the County's representative to the
kichmond Regional Water Resources Task Force with Mr. Richard L.
tedrick as alternate, whose terms of offics would be effective
kmmediately and would be for an undesignated period of time.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
(r. ~edrick stated there were no public hearings scheduled for
~his meeting.
NEW BUSINESS
[0.A. AIRPORT EXPANSION PROJECT
motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Eoard:
Authorized the County Administrator to solicit bids and
enter into a contract with the lowest responsive and
responsible bidder for overlaying the parallel ta×iway,
acquiring some additional land and easements and clearing
obstructions for the Airport Expansion.
Authorized the County Administrator to submit the detailed
budget application and to enter into a contract with the
federal and state governmen=s for the expenditure of
$450,000 in federal, state and county funds when received.
Appropriated the federal and state shares of the funds for
the Airport Expansion project ($427,500) and the local share
($22,500) to come from the Airport Industrial Park account.
Total appropriation is $450,000.
Unanimous
Vote:
10.B. RICHMOND A/~EA }4PO 1986 UNIFIED WOR/{ PROGR~M APPOINTMENTS
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
nominated Mr. R. J. McCracken to represent Chesterfield County as
the technical member of the Richmond Area MPC FY 1986 Unified
~ork Program (UWp Committee) replaoing Mr. Defter Williams who
served as Chesterfi~ld's technical representativs in the past.
Unanimous
O.C. CONSENT ITEMS
10.C.1. REQUESTS FOR BINGO AND/OR ~{AFFLE PERMIT~
Dn motion o~ Mrs. ~irone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
~pproved requests for a bingo and/or raffle permits £or calcnda~
85-038
year 1985 from the Manchester Music Boosters and Salem Church
Jaycees, and the Virginia Citizens Band Communicators, Inc.
Vote: Unanimous
10.C.2. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Deep Forest Road in Autumn Oaks, Sections B and
C, Matoaca District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mrs. Girone,
seconded by Mr. Daniel, it is resolved that Deep Forest Road in
Autumn Oaks, Sections B and C, Matoaca District~ be and it hereby
is established as a public road.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
iHighways and Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to
Itake into the Secondary Syetem, Deep Forest Road, beginning at
its intereeetion with Chalkl~y Road, ~tate Route 632, and running
westerly 0.26 mile to end in a temporary turnaround.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope easements.
This road serves 20 lots.
And be it further received, that the Beard of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Hiqhwaye a 50'
right-of-way for this road.
These sections of A~tumn Oaks are recorded as follows:
Section B. Plat Book 42, Page 61, February 25, 1983.
Section C. Flat Book 44, Page 45, November 2, 1983.
VOte: Unanimous
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Tri Gate Road, Passageway Drive, Mooring Way,
Dockside Drive and Dockside Court in Somerset, Sections 2 and 6,
Matoaca District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mrs. Girone,
seconded by Mr. Daniel, it is resolved that Tri Gate Road,
Passageway Drive, Mooring Way, Dockside Drive and Dockside Court
in Somerset, Sections 2 and 6, Matoaca District, be and they
hereby arc ~stablished as public roads.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Highways and Transportation, be and it hereby i~ requested to
take into the Secondary System, Tri Gate Road, beginning where
State Maln~enance ends, existing Tri Gate Road, State Route 1181
and running northwesterly 0.03 mile to the intersection with
Passageway Drive, then continuing northwesterly 0.02 mile to the
intersection with Mooring Way, then continuing northwesterly 0.14
mile to the intersection with Dockside Drive, then continuing
northwesterly 0.01 mile to end at proposed Tri Gate Road,
Somerset, Section 3; Passageway Drive, beginning at the
intersection with Tri Gate Road. and running southwesterly 0.03
mile to end in a dead end. Again Passageway Drive, beginning at
the intersection with Tri Gat~ Road and running northeasterly
0.02 mile to end at proposed Passageway Drive, Somerset, Section
52 Mooring Way, beginning at the intersection with Tri Gate Read
and running southwesterly 0.08 mile to end in a cul-de-sac;
Dockelde Drive, beginning at the intersection with Tri Gate Road
85-039
and running westerly 0.06 mile to the intersection with Dockside
Court, then continuing wes=erly 0.02 mile to end in a cul-de-sac;
and Dockside Court, beginning at the intersection with Dockside
Drive and running southerly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope easements.
These roads serve 47 lots.
And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Highways a 50'
right-of-way for all of these roads.
These sections of Somerset are recorded as follows:
Section 2. Plat Book 38, Page 42, March 17, 1981.
Section 6. Plat Book 43, Page 59, July 26, 1983.
Vote: Unanimous
10.C.3. AIRPORT ADVERTISING PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION
9n motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to apply for and
accept the Virginia Airport Promotion Program Grant in the amount
~f $2,031..00.
Vote: Unanimous
10.D. CO}L~UNITY D~V~LOPMENT ITEMS
~0.D.1. RESTRICTION OF TRUCK TRAFFIC ON COURTHOUSE ROAD
~r. McCracken stated that staff had been requested to pursue the
~estriction of through truck traffic on Courthouse Road between
Route 360 and Route 10. He stated that since Courthouse Road is
~ major north/south arterial in the County's road network, ~taff
feels that any restriction or public hearing should have the
)enefit of a full detailed traffic study by the Virginia
)epartment of Highways and Transportation. He stated the current
~DH&T policy requires the Board to conduct a public hearing ena
through truck restriction prior to their consideration cf the
hatter.
qr. Applegate stated there is a problem with 16 wheel trucks on
2ourthouse Road and he is concerned about the public safety on
~his road. re recommended an alternate route as Route 360 to
~hippenham and Chippenham to Route 95 or Route 1.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
agreed to hold a public hearing to consider the through truck
trafiic restriction on Courthouse Road.
V~te: Unanimous
Mr. Daniel inquired about the status of the Centralla Road
situation. Mr. Hedrick stated procedures are in motion.
10.D.~. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION COST APPROVAl,
On motion Of Mr. Daniel, seconded'by Mrs. Gi~one, the Board
approved'the ~treet light installation cost at Hopkins Road and
Edgemere Boulevard and appropriated $192.00 from the Dale
District Street Light Fund.
Vote: Unanimous
65-040
10.D.3. STREET LIGHT REQUEST
Mr. Dodd Stated his Street Light Fund balance was zero and if
there were a cost involved~ he could not presently recommend the
installation of a street light at N. Enon Church Road and Saffron
Mr. McRlfish stated he put this item on the agenda since it
possibly would not involve an installation cost.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Hayes, the Board approved
the installation of a street light at N. ~ncn Church Road and
Saffron Lane providing there would not be an installation cost.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Eedrick suggested staff talk with VEPC0 regarding the County
upgrading poles which VEPCO may eventually upgrade themselves.
10.D.4. CONTRACT FOR "CHESTER, PLAN OF THE TOWN OF"
Mr. McElfish stated staff has been attempting for some time to
get the roads in Chester, Plan of the Town of, State Accepted.
On motion o~ Mr. Dcdd, seconded by Fir. Hayes, the Board approved
and authorized the County Administrator to execute any necessary
documents for Castle Heights Construction Company in an amount
not to exceed $6,500 to have the roads in Chester, Plan of the
Town of, accepted into the state system with funds to be expended
from the bond amount from the bonding institution which the
County had received.
Vote: Unanimous
10.D.5. WAIVER FOR ~-~ERICAN SPRINKLER SYSTEMS, INC.
Mr. Muzzy stated staff has had a request from the American
Sprinkler Systems, Inc. in the Airport Industrial Park located on
Virginia Pine Court, requesting a waiver to the paving
rsquirement for paving of the loading and truck maneuvering area
due to poor soil conditions and construction of an addition to
the existing structure. Me stated staff has reviewed this
request and recommended to grant a waiver for 18 mmnths.
On motion o£ Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approved
an eighteen month waiver of Section C.2 of the Airport Industrial
Bark Restrictive Covenants for the American Sprinkler Systems,
10.E. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ITEMS
10.E.1. REPORTS
10.E.l.a. WATER AND SEWER FINANCIAL REPORTS
Mr. Welchons reviewed the Water and Sewer Financial Reports for
the Board. He stated in the Water Summary of Cash Funds Available
Balance of Uncommitted Funds that bond covenants require a three
(3) month reserve for operating expenses be maintained and that a
reserve for a year's debts be maintained. He stated staff
proposed to present the Capital Improvements Program at the next
Board work session. He stated that in regard to the Sewer
Summary of Cash Funds Available for Balance of Uncommitted Funds
that we do maintain a one (1) year reserve for debt service;
however, this is not required ~y the bond covenants.
Mr. Hedrick stated staff would ask the Board to adjourn today's
masting to the work session at 2:30 p.m. on February 13, 1985 to
85-041
review the Utility Master Plan and the Utility Capital
Improvements Program.
10.E.l.b. DEVELOPER WATMR AND SEWER CONTRACTS
Mr. Welchons presented the Board with a list of developer water
and sewer contracts executed by the County Administrator.
10.E.2. SET DATE TO CONVEY PROPERTY FOR POWEiTE PAt~KWAY
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board set
the date of February 27, 1985 at 9:00 a.m. for a public hearing
to convey property to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the
construction of Powhite Parkway.
vote: Unanimous
10.E.3. SEWER ITEMS
10.E.3.a. RESULTS OF SEWER SURVEY IN NORMANDALE TEP~qACE AREA
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board denied
the request to extend public sewer to the Mormandale Terrace Area
due to only 22.5% response by the residents.
Vote: Unanimous
10.E.3.b. R~SULTS OF SEWER SURVEY IN NORTH LAKE ~ILLS AREA
'On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board denled
:the request to extend public sewer to the North Lake Hills area
!due to only 22.2% response by the residents.
Mote: Unanimous
Mr. Dodd ~tated that since tap fees have become more expensive
ithat lack oi response in connecting to p~btic sewer may become a
itrend.
Mr. Daniel ~tatad that if the tap fees continue to climb, the
County may eventually have to appropriate some type of funding
mechanism to support connections if they become ~o cost
)rohibitive that an individual can not afford to connect to
~ublic sewer.
REQUEST FOR PUELIC $~WER IN KELLERSLEY
On motion of ~ir. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
authorized the Utilities Department to survey the Kellersley
Subdivision Area to determine the number of residents that will
sign contracts to connect to public sewer if it were made
available.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Mayas staked that staff should look into some method of
offering financial plans to residents to connect to public sewer
and water. Mr. Welchons stated that the County do~ offer
residents who want to connect to public sewer and water a 20
month installment plan with ne interest or carrying charges.
10.E.4. CONSENT ITEMS
10.E.4.a. CONTRACT FOR WATER LINES FOR MONACAN HILLS, S=C. 2
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
85-042
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute any
necessary documents for the following water contract:
W85-30CD/6(8)5302, Monaean Hills, Section 2
Developer: The Ashment Company
Contractor: Lewis H. Easter & Company
Total Contract Cost: $61,390.00
Total Estimated County CO~:
Estimated Developer Co~t:
Number of Connections: 76
Code: 566-1-00556-0000
Vote: Unanimous
4~015.74 (Refund through
connections)
$57,374.26
10.E.4.c. CONTRACT FOR WATER LINES ON ELMART LANE
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute any
neoeesary documents for Sydnor Hydrodynamics in the amount of
$16,393.00 uEin9 P.V.C. pipe, Contract W84-90B/6(8)4907, for the
installation of water lines on Elmart Lane.
Vote: Unanimous
10.E.4.d. CONTI~ACT FOR PANS AVENUE WATER TANK
On motion of M_rs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute any
necessary documents for the contract with Hydrostorage, Inc. in
the ~uount of $986,415 for the erection of PamE Avenue water
tank. The following transfers are to be made to 380-1-64327~4393.
These transfers will cover the estimated cost to erect the tank,
complete the site work and foundation,, and the extension of the
water line from Willim Road to the tank.
380-1-6102I (Sludge Facilities P.C.) $ 500,000.00
380-1-61031 (Replace ~rewired Panels F.C.) 100,000.00
380-1-61041 (Modification of Chemical
Feed Room S.C.) 46,000.00
380-1-62551 (Addition to Swift Creek) 224,155.61
380-1-69064 (Ettrick Rehabilitation) 72,163.70
380-1-62471 (Increase Capacity of S.C.) - 407,680.69
TOTAL
Vote: Unanimous
$1,350,000.00
DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG OLD STAGE ROAD
On motion of Mrs. ~ircn~, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
iapproved and authorized the County Administrator to execute thc
necessary deed accepting, on behalf of the County, a 5' etrip of
land along Old Stage Read from A. Lee Banhury and Jewell G.
Hanbury.
Vote: Unanimous
10.E.4.f. DEED 0E DEDICATION ALONQ CATTAIL ROAD
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to e×ecute the
necessary deed accepting, on behalf of the County, two (2) 20'
strips of land along Cattail Road from Lawrence R. Belcher and
Linda G. Belcher.
Vote: Unanimous
85-043
10.E.4.g. UTILITIES FOR R~OCATION FOR ROUTE 295
On metien of Mrs. Girone, seconded by ~r. Daniel, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute an
agreement cn behalf of the County subject to approval by the
County AttorHey's Office with Virginia Department of Highways and
Transportation and the County for Design of Utilities to be
relooated due to the construction of Route 298.
Vote: Unanimous
10.F. ~EPORTS
Mr. Eedrick presented the Board with a report Om the status of
the General Fund Contingency Account and General Fund Balance.
Mr. Hedrick stated the County had been officially notified that
the roads in the following subdivisions had been formally
accepted into the State Secondary System, effective as indicated:
Length
Whitestone Subdivision, Section ] (1-7-85)
Wadsworth Drive - Beginning where State maintenance
ends on existing State Route 2687, extending north-
eas~ 0.04 mile to the intersection of East Wadsworth
Place and West Wadsworth Place, thence northeast
0.07 mile tc the intersection of Wadsworth Way,
thence northeast 0.08 mile to Scottingham Drive. 0.19 mi.
West Wadsworth Place - Beginning at it~ intersection
with Wadsworth Drive~ extending northwest 0.04 mile
to a cul-de-sac. 0.04 mi.
East Wadsworth Place - Beginning at its intersection
with Wadsworth Drive, extending southeast 0.06 mile
tO a cul-de-sac. 0.06 mi.
Wadsworth Way - Beginning at its intersection with
Wadsworth Drive, extending southeast 0.04 mile to
a cul-de-sac. 0.04 mi.
Scottingham Drive - Beginning at its intersection
with Wadsworth Drive extending southeast 0.09 mile
to Grinelt Drive, then southeast 0.03 mile to
existing State Route 2728. 0.12 mi.
Grinell Drive - Beginning at its intersection with
Scuttingham Drive extending southwest 0.08 mile to a
cul-de-sac and extending northeast 0.06 mile to
Grinell Court. 0.14 mi.
Grinell Court ~ Beginning at its intersection with
Grinell Drive extending northwest 0.04 mile to a
cul-de-sac. 0.04 mi.
Burferd Court (1-15-85)
From Route 678 and going 0.07 mile to a southeast
cul-de-sac.
The Board recessed for lunch at the Airport Restaurant.
0.07 mi.
Reeonvening:
10.D.1. RESTRICTION OF TRUCK TRAFFIC - COURTHOUSE ROAD
~r. Applegate stated that a Board motion during the morning
85-044
session had failed to include the date f~ a public hearing on
item 18.D.l., R~striction of Through Truck Traftic on Courthouse
Road from Route 560 to Route 10. Ne stated the motion should
have been to ~et the public hearing date for March 13, 1985 at
7:00 p.m.
On motion of Mr.'Daniel, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
approved a public hearing for March 13, 1985 at 7:00 p.m. to
consider the restriction of through truck traffic on Courthouse
Road from Route 360 to Route 10.
Vote: Unanimous
10.G. REQUESTS FOR MOBILE HOME PERMITS
85SR020
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Glenn H. Henshaw, requested a
Mobile Home Permit to park a mobile home on property which
Pelongs to G. Henshaw, mother of the applicant. Tax Map 186-3
(2) Augustus Wright, Lot 15 and better known as 21700 Ferndale
Road (Sheet 52).
Mr. Glenn H. Hen~haw was present, The~e was no opposition
present. On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the
Board approved this request for a period o~ ~ive (5) years
subject to the following standard conditions:
i. The applicant shall be the owner and occupant of the mobile
home,
2. NO lot or parcel may be rented Or leased for use as a mobile
home ~ite, nor shall any mobile hom~ be used for rental
property. Only one (1) mobile home shall be permitted to be
parked on an individual lot or parcel.
3. The minimum lob size, yard se%backs, required front yard, and
other zoning requirements of the applicable zoning district
shall be complied with, except that no mobile home shall be
located closer than 20 feet to any existing residence.
Ne additional permanent-type living space may be added onto a
mobile home. All mobile homes shall be skirted but shall not
be placed on a permanent foundation.
Where public (County) water and/or ~ewer are available, they
shall be ~sed.
Upon being granted a ~obile Home Permit, the applicant shall
then obtain the necessary permits from the Office of the
Building Official. This shall be done prior to the
installation or relocation of the mobile home.
A~y violation of the above conditions shall be grounds for
revocation o~ the Mobil~ ~ome Permit.
Unanimc~
Vote:
858021
In Dale Magisterial District, Tanya ~errill, requested a Mobile
~ome Permit to park a mobile ho~e On property which belongs to D.
and J. Overacre, parents of a friend of the applicant. Tax Map
65-8 (2) Ampthill ~ardens, Section 2, Lot 66A and better known as
6716 Hill Road (Sheet 22).
The applicant was not pre~ent. Staff recommended denial of this
request because of the present and anticipated future development
85-045
in this area. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the
Soard denied this request.
10.H. REQUESTS FOR RBZONING
~4S168
In Bermuda Magisterial District, EDWIN H. RAGSDALE requested
~ezoning from Community Business (B-2) to Light Industrial (M-i)
~n a 5.5 acre parcel fronting approximately 283 feet on the south
line of Woods Edqe Road, also fronting approximately 540 feet on
Nappy Hill Road, and located in the southwest quadrant of the
~nterseetion of these roads. Tax Map 149-11 (1) Part of Parcel 3
Sheet 41).
fr. Balderson stated the applicant has withdrawn this request
from consideration. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr.
)odd, the Board approved the request for withdrawal from Mr.
Edwin E. Ragsdale of this application.
~ote: Unanimous
[n Clover Rill Magisterial District, JJR, A VA PARTNERSHIP
~equested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-9) on
~ 163.5 acre parcel lying at the western terminus of West
?rovidence Road. Tax Map 38-9 (1} Parcel 1 (Sheets 13 and 14).
4r. ~aldersen stated the Board had deferred this request from the
~ovember 28, 1984 Board meeting at the request of the applicant.
ie stated the Planning Commission had reviewed this request and
~ecommended denial of the application.
~r. Bewe was present. Ne stated this case has been pending since
~ebrnary, 1984, and the facts regarding the property were the
~ame now as they were several years ago when the Board approved
.he development of adjacent land.
~r. Applegate stated that since staff has recently received the
Cellerco Plan for the Route 288/Powhi=e Corridor Land Use and
Transportation Report, which should be made public in the near
future and since it does tie in with the piece of property Mr.
Bowe intends to develop, he suggested a 30-day deferral to work
out a solution.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board
deferred further consideration of this item until February 27,
1985.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Dodd requested that $45143 and 84S149 be moved to the end of
the rezonlng agenda.
84$196
In Dal~ Magisterial District, CROV~R C. AND ROSA H. KESLER AND
5EWIS T. AND MARION F. WOODCOCK requested rezoning from
Residential (R-7) to Convenience Business (B-l) plus Conditional
~se Planned Development to permit a convenience store on a 1.46
acre parcel fronting approximately 305 feet on the east line of
Purner Road also fronting approximately 70 feet On W~lmsley
~eelevard, and located in the southeast quadrant of the intersec-
tion of these roads. Tax Map 40-6 (1) Parcels 14 and 15 (Sheet
[5).
~r. Balderson stated this case was deferred from the December 12,
~9~4 Board meeting, and the Planning Commission has recommended
85-046
approval. Be furtker noted that staff had met with the
applicant's representative and at the direction of the
prepared the conditions on pages 2 and 3 of the staff analysis.
Be advised that staff did not £eel the land use was compatible
with area development even with these conditions. Mr. Balder$on
advised that he had reviewed a recent letter from Mr. Leslie
Saunders, representating the applicant, requesting several
changes to these condition~. Mr. Balderson suggested that only
Conditions 1 and 2 be amended if the Board approves B-1 zoning in
lieu of 0 zoning.
Mr. Jeff Collins asked for a 30 day deferral to give the o~ners
o£ the property an opportunity to meet with the person who has
the option to purchase the property to deter~0ine if he wants to
proceed with the application as it currently stands. There was
no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
deferred further consideration of this item until Februany 27,
1985.
Vote: Unanimous
84S111 (Amended)
In Clover Bill Magisterial District, LUTHER CAUDLE AND ED BELL
requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) and Residential (R-15)
to Sight Industrial (M-l) of 122.1 acre.s, plus a Conditional Use
Planned Development to permit use and bulk exceptions on this
t~act plus on an adjacent 34.5 acre tract currently zoned
Residential (E-15). This request fronts approximately 838 feet
on the northeast line of Warbro Road approximately 5,000 feet
north of Hull Street Road, also front~ approximately 230 feet On
the south line of Genito Road approximately 150 feet east of
Brookforest Road. Tax Map 48 (1) Parcels 16 and 62; Tax Map 48-8
(1) Parcel 3; Tax Map 48-12 (1) Parcel 1; and Tax Map 48-16 (3)
Genito Estates, Section A, Block C, Lot 4 (Sheet 13).
Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission had reviewed this
request in December, 1984 and had reoo~ended approval of the
amended request as set forth by the applicant. He stated staff
felt the plan being presented to the Board et thi~ meeting is
agreeable and acceptable to the County and the applicant.
Mr. Jim ~ayes of J. K. Timmons and As~ooiate~, Inc. referred the
Board to the case history c£ this item stating a meeting had been
held with community me~ber~, developers, staff and the builder.
ge also stated several conditions had been agreed upon by all
~arties and these were acceptable to the applicant.
~here was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board
approved this request subject to the following ccnOi~ions:
i. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan prepared
by J.K. Tim~en~ and Associates, Inc., revised August 28,
1984, shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
2. A 100 foot buffer shall be maintained along the perimeter of
the Light ~ndustrial (M~i) tract adjacent to residential
zoning. This buffer shall be landscaped in accordance with
the "Minimum Guidelines for Landscaped Buffers." A 100 foot
buffer shall al~o be maintained along the northern property
boundary of the M-1 tract where adjacent to Agricultural
zoning; this ~uffer, however, may be modified by the
Planning Commission at the time of schematic plan review if
adjacent property kas been zoned and/or developed for
commercial or industrial uses, or ii a plan is submitted
which accomplishes sufficient buffering in a lesser width.
A conceptual landscaping plan depicting this requirement
shall be submitted to the Planning Co~mission for approval
85-047
in conjunction with schematic plan review. A detailed
landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Planning Depart~
ment for approval in conjunction with final site plan
review. (p)
3. Uses permitted in the Light Industrial (M-l) tract shall be
confined to those uses permitted by the Zoning Ordinance
with the exception of cosmetic and toiletries (compounding
only) manufacturing plus the following use exceptions on
lots which ara not adjacent to residentially zoned property:
a. Building materials (storage and sale)
b. Contractor shops and storage yards
c. Other fabricated metal products manufacturing not
otherwise listed in this chapter
d. Public utility storage yards
e. Signs and advertising displays
(manufacturing}
f. Truck terminals
g. Wholesale qreenhouses
h. Cut stone and s~one products (manufacturing)
i. Lumber and wood products (except furniture)
manufacturing
j. Machinery (except electrical) manufacturing
k. Paper recycling by compacti(an method
¢. All .driveways and parking areas in the Light Industrial
(M-l) tract shall be paved and delineated by curb and
gutter.
5. With the exception of lots abutting Markey Road and lots
adjacent to Tax Map 48-16 (3) Genito Estates, Section A,
Block C, Lots 1, 2 and 3 (i.e., Moscher, Burks and Hall on
Master Plan) and Tax Map 48-16 (1) Parcel 20 (i.e., Sussman
on Master Plan) which shall conform to Residential (R-15)
bulk requirements, the "R-15 use exception" tract shall be
developed in accordance with Residential (R-9) requirements.
Overall density shall not exceed 2.49 units per acre.
5. The developer shall provide an accurate account of the
drainage situation, showing existing drainage and the impact
this project will have on the site and the surrounding area.
The developer shall submit a plan to Environmental
Engineering providing for on- and off-site drainage
facilities to be utilized in the hydraulic engineering for
each drainage out£all. Plans shall be approved by the Plan-
ning Commission at the time of schematic approval for the
first building con~tructed and in conjunction with
Environmental Engineering. This plan shall be approved
prior to the clearing of any land and implemented prior
the issuance of any occupancy permit.
?. The developer shall submit a plan for erosion and sediment
control to Environmental Engineering for each drainage
Outfall. Such a plan ~hall be comprised of vegetative and
engineering practices (as outlined in the "Erosion and
Sediment Control Technical Handbook," publiDhed by the James
River Soil and Water Conservation District) to be utilized
as erosion and sediment control measures for the project.
The plan shall be approved by Environmental Engineering
prior to the issuance of any building permit and implemented
prior to clearing any land. (EE)
8. The lake within the "R-15 bulk exception" tract ~hall remain
under private Ownership. To avoid potential algae and
siltation problems, the minimum depth of the lake shall not
be less than 3% feet within ten (!0) feet of the shoreline.
A maintenance and operations manual shall be provided to
85-048
future owners prior to, or in conjunction with, recordation
of any area which drains to the lake. (EE&SS)
9. Prior to recordation of any lotm or roadm which drain to the
lak~, the lake and dam shall be certified by a qualified
engineer. (EE)
10. Required drainage outfalls shall be constructed and/or
improved by the developer in conjunction with the first site
utilizing the outfall. {~=)
11. Prior to release of any building permits in the M-1 tract,
thirty (30) feet of right of way, measured from the
centerline of Warbro Road, and forty-five (45) feet of right
of way, measured from the centerline of Genito Road, shall
be dedicated to and for the County of Chesterfield, free and
unrestricted. (T)
12. Turn lanes shall be constructed at aeoess pelnt$ to Warbro
Roads, a~ deemed necessary by VDH&T and the Tranmportation
Department.
13. Stub roads shall be provided to adjacent properties to the
north. This condition may be modified by the Planning
Commission at the time of schematic plan approval.
(T,P&CPC)
~nd further the Board accepted th~ following proffered
uonditionm:
1. Minimum finished ~quare footage of houses:
a. Ranch Style 1,200 square feet
b. Two-mtory Style 1,500 square feet
c. Expandable
Two-Story Style 1,160 square feet
2. Foundations - Ail ~oundatione of houses will be exposed
brick and concealed block with the exception of contemporary
houses, which shall have parget coated block.
3. Pre-fabricated fireplaces - All metal flue pipe~ will be
enclosed in framed wood chimneys with applied siding the
same at the main house.
~4S130 (Amended)
In Clover ~ill Magisterial District, THOMAS C. AND DEBORA~ J.
THOMAS requested amendment to a previously granted Conditional
Use (Case 83S153) to permit relocation of a riding ring,
encroachment of a driveway into the previously required fifty
(50) foot buffer, and inclusion of an additional 0.598 acres for
the use. This request lies in an Aqricultural (A) District on a
20.598 acre parcel fronting approximately 150 feet ea the north
line of Woolridge Road, approximately 4,300 feet northeast of
Otterdale Road. Tax Map 60 (1) Parcel 46 and Part of Parcel 4
Sheet 19).
Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission recommended approval
subject to the conditions noted in the staff report. There was
ho opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved this request eubjeot to the following conditions as
approved by the Planninq' Commission:
1. The following conditions notwithstanding the plan prepared
by Bodie, Taylor and Puryear, Inc., dated April 16, 1984 and
85-049
the landscaping plan submitted with the application shall be
considered the plan of development. (P)
The lucidum shrubs to be planted in ~he areas specified on
the plan of development shall have an initial height of
thirty (30) inches. (CPC)
The driveway shall be located a minimum of twenty (20) feet
from the eastern property line.
(NOTE~ The driveway must be widened to a minimum of twenty
(20) feet ih accordance with BOCA Code requirements to
accommodate two way traffic). (P)
Vote: Unanimous
~4S155
In ~idlothian Magisterial District, C~NTUR~ KEY CONCEPTS REAL ES-
rATE, INC. requested Conditional Uee Planned Development to
permit use and bulk exceptions in a Residential (R-7) District On
~ 2.3 acre parcel fronting approximately 174 feet On the north
line of Midlothian Turnpike, approximately 430 feet west of
~ycamore Square Drive. Tax ~ap 15-12 12) Winterfield, Lot 44
Sheet 7).
ir. Balderaon stated the Planning Commission has reviewed this
~eque~t and recommended approval subject to the eonditlons set
~orth in the analysis.
~s. Alice Kendriok, Owner of Century 21 Key Concepts, requested
~hat since this request is a Conditional Use Planned Development
~ot to exceed two y~ara that she be allowed to use the current
lrlveway into the property.
Phere was no opposition present.
)n motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
~pproved this request subject to the following conditions:
L. This Conditional Use Planned Development shall permit the
utilization of the existing structure for a real estate
office, exclusively. Other than renovation and normal
maintenance, there shall be no exterior alterations or
additions to the existing structure. (P)
This Conditional Use Planned Development shall be granted
iora period not to exceed two (2) years from date of
approval. (p)
3. Driveway and parking areas shall be graveled with a minimum
of six (6) inches of #21 Or $21A stone. (BS)
4. A single freestanding sign, not to exceed ten (10) square
feet and a height of fiv~ (5) feet, shall be permitted
identifying this use. This sign may be externally lighted,
or may be internally lighted if. the signfield is opaque with
translucent letters. The sign's facades shall be of ~ubdued
colors. In conjunction with schematic plan submission, a
colored rendering shall be submitted to the Planning Commis-
sion for approval, (P)
5. In conjunction with the granting of this request, an
exception to the requirement that parking areas be screened
from view of adjacent residential property shall be granted.
(P)
~ote: Unanimous
85-050
845160 (~uuended)
In Clover Sill Magisterial District, KPC NATIONAL MANAG=~ENT
COMPANY requested amendment to a previously granted Conditional
Use Planned Development (Case 825038) to permit encroachment into
e required buffer and exceptions to a required driveway and
parking setbacks in General Business (B-3) and Co~u~unity Business
{B~2} Districts on a 2.7 acre parcel fronting approximately 400
feet on the north line of ~ull Street Road, approximately 680
feet west of Courthouse Road. Tax Map 49-7 (1) Part of Parcels 7
and $ (Sheet 14).
Mr. Baldersen etated the Planning Commission has reviewed this
request and recommended approval subject to the conditions
Dutllned in the analysis.
Mr. Bill Walton representing the applicant stated the applicant
~as in agreement with the conditions as recommended by the
Planning Commission.
there was no Opposition present.
Dn motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
~pprcved this request ~ubject to the following conditions=
The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan dated
10/30/84 titled "~endment of Conditional Use Planned
Development" shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
2. In conjunction with final site plan submi~Bion, a
landscapinq plan for the area lying between the Route 360
right of way and the proposed driveway, which parallels
Route 360, shall be submitted to the Planning Department for
approval. This landscaping shall be for the purpose of
minimizing the view of parking and driveway areas from Route
360. IP&CPC)
The drive-i~ window lane for the westernmost site shall be
separated from the internal driveways by a concrete curb.
Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed around the
perimeter of all driveways and parking areas. (~)
5. ~rior tO issuance of any occupancy permit, additional
pavement and curb and gutter shall be installed along the
entire length of the Route 360 frontage, as deemed necessary
by the Transportation Department and VD~&T. (T and VDE&T)
6. The two (2) entrance/exits from Route 360 shall have a
maximum width of fifty (50) feet. (CPC)
7. In conjunction with the approval o~ this request, the
Planning Commission shall grant schematic plan approval of
the Master Plan. (P)
Vote: Unanimous
84S161-II
In Midlothian Magisterial District, KFC NATIONAL MANAGEMENT
COMPANY requested Conditional Use Planned Development to permit
bulk exceptions relative to sig~s in a Community Business (B-2)
District on a 0.66 acre parcel fronting approximately 170 feet on
the south line of Midlothian Turnpike, approximately 440 feet
west of Courthouse Road.. Tax Map 16-12 (1) Part of Parcel 25
Sheet 7).
85-051
Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission has reviewed this
request and recommends approval subject to the conditions norad
in the request analysis.
There was no opposition p~esent.
Mr. Bill Gear representing the applicant asked for a
clarification on the Planning Commission's reference of all signs
located on the property nog to exceed 85 square feet. Ha wanted
to know if this included directional signs.
Mr. Balderson stated the 85 square feet did not include
directional signs.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved this request subject to the following condition:
Except for directional signs, as defined by the Zoning
Ordinance, the total aggregate area of all signs located On
the property shall not exceed eighty-five (85) square feet.
The freestanding sign shall not exceed an aggregate area of
~ixty (60) square feet and a height of ten (10) feet and
shall be as depicted on the plans submitted with the appli-
cation. (CPC)
Vote.: Unanimous
84S174
In Midlothian Magisterial District, C. PORTER VAUGHAN, INC.
requasted Conditional Use Planned Development to permit bulk
exceptions in a Residential (R-40) District on a 231.66 acre
parcel fronting approximately 275 feet on the west line of Corner
Rock Road. approximately 975 feet south of Robious Road. Tax Map
8-9 (1) Parcel 1; Tax Map 8-10 (1) Parcel 1; and Tax Map 8-14 (1)
Part of Parcel 1 (Sheets 2 and 7).
Mr. Salderson stated the Planning Commission has reviewed this
residential request and is recommending approval subject to the
conditions as set forth in the analysis.
Mr. Leroy Vaughan of C. Porter Vaughan Realtors was present
representing the developers. He stated in regard to oondi=ion 3,
they be allowed the 15,000 square feet exception in the R-40
zoning for parcel 3.
Hr. David ~hillips representing the residents on Wadebridge Road,
the residents in Salisbury and other area residents was present
to oppose this request. ~e stated their primary objection was
the change to R-25 lots, between Salisbury Subdivision and the
drainage way. ~e stated the plan was less beneficial to
neighbors and felt their property values would be diminished. He
stated the opposition he represented felt there should be ne
connector to Wadabridqe and Salisbury Roads.
Mrs. Girone stated Some of the history of the connector roads in
subdivisions in the County and gave some examples to substantiate
the need for connector roads.
Mr. Bill Phillips stated he was opposed to the Salisbury
connector road and did not believe it was necessary.
Mr. John Hubbard stated he was opposed to the Wadebridge
connector road since he had purchased his property on a
cul-de-sac and was concerned for thc safety of his children.
Mr. Hollis Shomo stated he was opposed to the zoning change in
the size of the lots, the connection to Salisbury Road and the
extension of Wadebridge Road.
85-052
Mrs. ~irone noted some of the planned changes in area roads which
had been funded or are under construction.
Mr. Baldersen gave a history of how the R-40 sorting came about in
this area of the County.
Mrs. Girone stated this request is ~ompatible with other zoning
in this area.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved a Conditional Use Planned Development to permit bulk
exceptions in a Residential (~-40) District subject to the
following conditions:
The following conditions notwithstanding, the Master Plan
prepared by Jordan Consulting Engineers, P.C., revised
10/24/84, shall be considered the approved Master Plan for
development. However, prior to receiving tentative
approval, a revised plan shall be submitted to the Planning
Department reflecting the following revisions/conditions.
2. NO bulk exceptions shall be granted for the Paroel 1 ar~a
except that Lots 7 and 8, Block B shall be granted 20 foot
exceptions to the front and rear yards.
3. All lots in the Parcel 3 area shall be developed with the
following bulk requirements= (BS)
a. Lot area - 25,000 ~quare feet minimum
b. Lot width - 120 feet
c. Front yard - 60 feet except for Elock C, Lots 46,
51-53, 59-61 and 75-70 and Block A, Lots 7-9,
11-13 and 33, which shall be no less than 40 feet.
d. Rear yard - 30 feet
e. Side yard - 15 feet
4. Ail lots in the Parcel 2 area shall be developed with the
following bulk requirements: (BSI
a. Lot area - 20,000 square feet minimum
Lot width - 120 feet
c. Front yard - 60 feet, except for Block C, Lots
7-37; Block F, Lots 7&8; Block J, Lot~ 3-12; Block
L, Lots 6-12; Block I, Lots 47-53; Block K, Lots
23-28; Block G, Lots 21-26; Block A, Lots 29-32,
40-44, which shall be no less than 40 feet.
d. Rear yard - 30 feet
e. Side yard - 20 feet
5. A detailed soils analysis shall be submitted to and approved
by Environmental Bngineerlng to determine if special footing
design will be necessary. (SS)
A geot%chnical analysis shall be submitted to and approved
by Environmental Engineering showin~ the location and extent
of mining operations on site. (EE)
Drainage plans must be approved by Environmental Fngi-
neerinq. If necessary, drainage patterns previously
established by Charter Woods Subdivision will be redesigned
at this developer's expsnse. Also, if necessary, this
developer will be required t0 relocate the existing paved
ditch and silt basin in Charter Woods to a location
downstream from this development. (ES)
There shall be no road connection to Wadebridge Road in
Salisbury Subdivision. Road A shall be connected to
Salisbury Road through the fifty (50) foot right of way
85-053
lying between Lot 21, Block B and LOt 1, Block D of
Salisbury, Section A.
And further the Board accepted the following proffered condition:
Two thousand (2,000) square foot minimum finished home.
Vote: Unanimous
84S175
In Clover Eill Magisterial Dietriet, WENDY'S INTEI~NATIONAL, INC.
requested Conditional Use Planned Development to permit bulk
exceptions in a General Business ~E-3) District on a 0.77 acre
parcel fronting approximately 110 feet on the south line of
Midlothian Turnpike, approximately 390 feet east of Mall Drive.
Tax Map 17-9 (1) Parcel 45 (Sheet $).
Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission has reviewed this
request and recommended approval subject to the conditions noted
in the analysis.
Mr. Bob Carter stated the applicant concurred with the
recommendation approved by the Planning Commission. There was no
~ppo~ition present.
On motion of FLr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board
approved the building setback exception, the parking setback
exception along the eastern property line and a one (1) parking
space exception subject to the following conditions:
The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan prepared
by Robert K. Carter, revised November 16, 1984, shall be
considered the Master Plan. (P)
2. The proposed parking space which en~rea~hes into the fifty
(50) foot setback along the western prcperty line shall be
eliminated. (T&P)
3. Between the Midlothian Turnpike ~ight of way and the
proposed parking spaces, ornamental trees and shrubs shall
be planted to minimize the visual impact of the
encroachment. A landscaping plan depicting this requirement
shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval
in conjunction with final site plan review.
¢. In conjunction with th~ g~anting of this request, the
Planning Commission shall grant schematic plan approval of
the Master Plan. (P)
And further the Board denied the parking setback exception along
the western property line.
Vote: Unanimous
84S176
In Clover Hill Magisterial District,. WENDY'S INTERNATIONAL, IBC.
requested Conditional Use Planned Development to permit bulk
exceptions in a General Business (B-3) District on a 0.77 acre
parcel fronting approximately 100 feet on the north line of Null
Street Road, also fronting approximately 75 feet on Dyer Lane and
located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of these
roads. Tax ~ap 29-14 (2) P~ovidenca Farm, Lot 7B (Sheet 9).
~r. Balderson stated the Rlanning Commission had reviewed this
r~quest and recommended approval subject to the conditions set
forth in the analysis.
Mr. Bob Car~er who represented the applicant stated he was in
~gre~ment with the conditions, There was no opposition present.
85-054
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mrs. Girona, the ~oard
approved this request subject to the following conditions:
The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan prepared
by Robert K. Carter, revised November 13, 1984, shall be
considered the Master Plan. (P)
In conjunction with the approval of this request, the
Planning Commission shall grant schematic plan approval of
the ~aster Plan. (P)
84H199
In ~idlothian Magisterial Dist~i~t, STRUM LAND COMPANY requested
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-15) of ll.1
~cres and to Residential (R-25) of 7.9 acres on a parcel lying
approximately 2,200 feet off the west line of Courthouse Road,
Dff the western terminus of Berrand Road. Tax Map 26-8 (1)
Parcel 7 and Tax Map 27-5 (1) Parcel 6 (Sheets 7 and 8).
Zr. Balde~$~n stated the Planning Commission had reviewed this
request and recommended approval,
~ir. Dick Ycungblood with Youngblood, Tyler and Associates
representing the Strum Land Company gave information regarding
the development of this property which will be compatible to
~djacent property.
~here was no Opposition present.
Dn motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
· pproved this request.
~ote: Unanimous
~4S200
In Bermuda Magisterial District, ~ALPH J. RUTL~DGE, JR., DDS,
requested a~endment of a previously granted Conditional Use (Case
84S063) to permit expansion of a beauty salon in a Light
Industrial (M-l) District on a 0.68 acre parcel fronting
approximately 150 feet on the north line of West ~undred Road,
approximately 1,150 feet ~a~< of Harbour ~ast Drive. Tax Map
117-11 (1) Parcel 11 (Sheet 33).
Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission had reviewed this
request and recommended approval subject to the conditions set
forth in the analysis.
Mr. Bill Chavis, representing Dr. Rutledge, stated the applicant
only wanted to add some additional styling chairs in the beauty
shop.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board approved
this request subject to the following conditions:
1. The following condition no~withstanding, all previously
imposed conditions of Conditional Use 84S063 shall apply.
2. This amendment shall permit an additional 780 square teet
(1,600 square feet total) to be used for the beauty salon.
(P)
85-055
Vote: Unanimous
84S201
In Bermuda Magisterial District, W.E. DUKE AND SONS, INC.
requested Conditional Use to permit a landfill in a Community
Business (B-2) District on an 11.0 acre parcel ~onting
app~oxlmately 800 feet On the east line of Jefferson Davis Eiqh-
way, approximately 600 feet south of Osborne Road. Tax Map 98-14
(1; Parcel 6 (Sheet 32).
Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission has reviewed the
request and recommended approval a~ noted in the request
analysis. NO one was present to represent this case.
Mr. Dodd Stated that since he has some questions to ask Mr. Duke
regarding this request, he would like to have a 30 day deferral.
On notion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
deferred this matter until the February 27, 1985.
Vot~: Unanimous
84S202
In Clove~ Hill ~agisterial District, FERNBROOK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSO-
CIATION, INC. requested a ConditiOnal Use tO permit a
recreational facility in a Residential (R-12) District on a 3.5
acre parcel fronting approximately 200 feet on the south line of
Fordham Road, also frontinq approximately 90 £eet on Fordham
Place, and located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection
of thsse roads. Tax Map 50-6 (1) Parcel 4B and Tax Map 50-1~
(11) Fernbrook Chatham Grove Phase II, Block P, Lots 65, 66 and
67 (Sheet 14).
Mr. Balderson stated the Planning Commission has reviewed this
request and recommended approval as noted in the analysis.
There was no opposition present.
Mr. Uon Hager representing the Fernbrook Neighborhood
Association, Inc. stated the applicsnt was in agreement with the
Planning Commission recommendation.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, ~econded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved this request subject to the following conditions=
The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan prepared
by Jordan Consulting Engineer, P.C., dated 7/18/84, shall be
considered the plan of development. (P)
A six (6) foot high solid board fence shall be installed
adjacent to Lot 3, Fernbrook, Section C-1. A six (6) foot
high solid board fence shall also be installed adjacent to
Lot 64, Fernbrook Chatham Grove, Phase II, Block F from
Chatham. Grove Lane to the edge. of the floodplain. Along the
remaining length of Lot 64, evergreen tree~, having an
initial height of six (6) feet, shall be planted. A thirty
(30) foot naturally wooded buffer shall b~ maintained adja-
cent to Part of Parcel 2, Tax Map 50-10 (i.e., Clay
Property, as shown on the Master Plan). Landssaping plans
depicting these requirements shall be submitted to the
Planning Depar=ment for approval in ~onjunction with final
site plan review. (P)
85-056
Vote:
3. Reereational facilities shall be limited to picnic tables, a
pavilion, and two (2) tennis courts. The tennis courts
shall not be liqhted. (P)
4. Hours of operation shall be confined to between 8:00 a.m.
and 8:08 p.m. Vehicular driveways shall be barricaded with
a locked gate between 8:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. (P)
{Note: The Zoning Ordinanee requires that driveways and
parking areas for six (6) or more vehicles be paved. Also,
the BOCA Code requires that driveways have a minimum width
of twenty {20) feet.)
5. The proposed fence along Fo~dham Road and Fcrdham Court
shall be no higher than three (3} feet six (6) inches and
shall be of an ornamental nature {i.e., picket, split rail,
etc.). Evergreen trees shall be planted along the road
frontaqe to minimize the view of the facilities. A
landscaping plan depicting this requirement shall be
submitted to the Planning Department for approval in
conjunetion with final site plan review. (P)
6. Prior to obtaining any building permits, subdivision plats
for Wernbrook and/or Fernbrook Chatham Grove shall be
re-recorded to reflect recreational use of that property
encompassed by this application. (P}
All driveways and parking areas shall be delineated by
permanent means (i.e., timber curbs, etc.). (P)
84S204
In Midlothian Magisterial District, WILLIA~ CAMPBELL requested
Conditional Use Planned Development to permit use and bulk
excsptlons in an Agricultural (A) District on an 11.25 acre
parcel fronting approximately 470 feet on the south line of
Midlothian Turnpike, approximately 2,600 feet east of Dry Bridge
Road. Tax Map 14 (1) Parcel 29 (Sheet 6).
Mr. Balderson stated that the Planning Cormmission had reviewed
this request and recommended approval subject to the amended
conditions as outlined in the analysis.
Mr. Applegate declared a possible conflict of interest with this
case and excused himself from the meeting pursuant to the
Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act.
MS. Jones, representing Mr. William Campbell, stated the need for
clarification of the parking area and cc~m%ercial entrance. She
asked if the building could be used to house professional offices
other than those listed in the request without having to pave the
parking area.
Mr. Balderson stated that if Use cf the building were expanded,
the parking area should be paved.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved this request as amended subject to the following
:onditions:
The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan prepared
by Woodrow K. corer, Inc., dated October 17, 1984, shall be
considered the Master Plan. (P)
Uses permitted shall be limited to an antique shop, interior
design business and general office. (BS)
85-057
There shall be no exterior alterations or additions to the
existing structure to accommodate these uses. (P)
One sign, not to exceed eight (8) square feet and a height
of five (5) feet, shall be permitted identifying these uses.
This sign shall not be internally lighted, but may be
externally lighted. The sign's facades shall be of subdued
colors. Prior. to obtaining a sign permit, a colored
rendering shall be submitted to the Planning Department for
approval. (p)
5. If development is limited to an antique shop and/or interior
design business, all driveway~ and parking areas shall be
graveled with six (6) inches of ~21 or ~21A stone. Ail
driveways and parking areas shall be delineated by a
permanent means (i.e., timber curbs, curb and gutter~
If general office use is developed, driveways and parking
areas must be paved per the Zoning Ordinance.
(Note: Based On the Commission's recommendation, all
parking areas must be located a minimum of fifty (50) feet
from the Midlothian Turnpike right of way.)
5. A landscaping plan shall be submitted to tho Planning
Department for approval in conjunction w±th site plan review
.for the area lying between the proposed parking are~
Midlothian Turnpike. This landscaping shall be for the
purpose of minimizing %he view of parking from Midlothian
Turnpike. (P&CPC)
?. In conjunction with the approval of this requestt the
Planning Commission shall grant ~ahematie plan approval of
the Ma~tar Plan, subject to compliance with the conditions
stated herein. (P)
Ryes: Mr. Mayas, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
~bsent: Mr. Applegate.
~r. Applegate returned to the meeting.
84S143
In Bermuda Ma~isteriaI District, R0~L%~ ~ILL D~V~LOPM~NT CORP.
requested Conditional Use Planned Development to permit townhouse
development in a Residential (R-4D) District on a 23.3 acre
parcel fronting approximately 450 feet on the east llne of
Chester Road, approximately 2,400 feet south of Centralia Road.
Tax Map 97-1~ (1) Parcel 9 (Sheet 32).
Mr.. Balderscn stated the Planning Commission had reviewed this
request and recommended denial.
Mr. Cal Ssaton representing Rolling Hills Development Corporation
stated the applicant does not agree with the staff
recommendation.
Mr. Paul Barr who was present to oppose this request ~tated he
lives next to the proposed project. He presented to the Board a
letter from Pioneer Financial Corporation stating that they do
not approve of this project along'with petitions from the
neighbors who oppose this project, copies of which ars filed with
the papers of this ~oard. He ~tated this project is not
consistent with other projects in this area.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board denied
this request.
Vote: Unanimous
85-058
The Board recessed ~or five minutes.
84S149
In Bermuda Magisterial District, B. F, HILL, PIONEER FINANCIAL
SERVICE AND G. EMERSON requested rezoning from Agricultural (A)
to Residential (R-9) and Residential (R-12) plus Conditional Use
Planned Development to permit use exceptions on an 84.0 acre
parcel fronting approximately 2,133 feet on the southeast line of
Bermuda Hundred Road also fronting approximately 1,950 feet on
Golf Course Road and located in the southeast quadrant of the
intersection of these roads. Tax Map 117-16 (1) Part of Parcel 1
(Sheets 33 and 42).
Mr. Bald~rson gave a background of the application for this
request and stated the latest plan to be submitted had not been
reviewed by the Planning Commission. He stated that staff had
prepared an addendum for this request. He also stated that
staf~ had been directed by the Board at their October, 1984
meeting to prepare an amendment for the Eastern Area Plan which
deals specifically with this neighborhood centering on the parcel
in question. He stated that this plan is still under preparation
and should be presented to the Hoard in March, 1985; and, unless
directed otherwise, staff will continue with the preparation of
this study.
Mr. Peele outlined the applicants request for rezoning.
Mr. Jeff Collins, representing Charles Townes and Associates,
presented additional background on this application. He also
stated some of the residents' concerns; mainly, the desire not to
have apartments built on this site. He presented the Hoard with
a llst of three (3) proffered conditions to be added to the
application for rezoning, a copy of which is filed with the
papers of this Board.
Mr. Applegate stated that on the advice of the County Attorney,
the Board cannot accept any proffered conditions submitted to the
!Board at this meeting since proffers must be submitted in writing
prior to the meeting.
Hr. Collins asked to have these proffers considered by the Board
as possible conditions to be added to the Conditional Use.
Hr. Micas stated the Board could consider these proffers as
possible conditions.
Mr. Collins stated he felt the applicant had made a substantial
compromise in amending their request, and pointed out that this
is a transitional property from commercial to single family
dwellings.
Mr. Dodd asked what provisions had been made for the cemetery
located on this property.
Mr. Collins stated the cemetery is not beinq sold with the
property and that an access is being created from a planned road
to the cemetery.
Mr. Joe McCaffrey, a residen= o3 the Enon area, spoke in favor of
this project. He ~elt a project of this type would be beneficial
to the County, the community, and the businesses within this
Mr. David Sauers, President of Enon Civic Association, gave a
history of this project. He listed several meetings which
85-059
ad been held with Mr. Dcdd, the applioant~, the representatives
of this association and citizens of the area. He presented the
Board with two sets cf petitions signed by area residents
opposing multi-family dwellings on this property, copies of which
are filed with the papers of this Hoard.
Mr. Christopher Milton, Vice President of Enon Civic Association,
SpOke in opposition of this project stating that multi-family
homes were the major objection. He stated the residents had
originally asked for the entire area to be zoned R-15. He noted
density, flooding of Johnson's Creek and overcrowding of schools
as concerns.
Mr. Dickie King representing his parents and friends who own
property in the area spoke about the previous flooding of
Johnson's Creek, the change of location of the Johnson Creek
drainage area and expressed concern about possible drainage
problems of this project.
Pictures showing the flooding of Johnson's Creek were presented
to the Board, which pictures are filed with the Board papers.
Mr. skitch Rudy, representing Mr. and Mrs. Ronald Luck, expressed
concern over drainage problems with this project. Me stated he
felt off-site easements should be required before any zoning is
appr.oved. He referred to the Comprehensive Eastern Area
Development Plan and stated he felt that what Board does with
this project will set a trend for the entire core area.
Fir. Ronnie Luck co~mended Mrs. Girone and Mr. Mayes for the way
they represent their constituents, sta~ed his opposition to this
project and stated some of the problems which this project.needs
to address.
Mr. Dodd explained the drainage problem surrounding Johnson's
Creak. He stated a declaration of a motion he planned to make
regarding this project.
Mr. Halderson stated that a subdivision plan approval would have
to be made before the applicants could begin development.
After much discussion between the Board and representatives of
the opposition of this project, on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded
by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved the rezoning from Agricultural
(A) to Reeidential (R-9, R-12 and R-15) plus a Conditional Use
Planned Development subject tO several conditions.
The Board recessed for five minutes before taking the vote on
this motion.
Beconvening:
:Mn. Daniel amended the Board motion to state ne clearing,
grubbing, and timbering will take place until an approved
drainage plan which includes provisions for off-site easements is
made by the Highway Depart/~ent and the Chesterfield County
Planning Staff.
Mr. Dodd and Mr. Mayes stated they accepted Mr. Daniel's
amendment to their motion.
Mr. Applegate stated he would like to amend the motion to extend
the requested R-12 zoning north to the creek through Tract A as a
· transition between R-9 and R-15 zoning.
Mr. Dodd and Mr. Mayes stated they accepted Mr. Applegate's
suggested a~endment to their motion and on motion of Mr. Dodd,
seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved the rezoning from
Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-9, R-12 and R-15) plus a
Conditional Use Planned Development subject to the following
conditions:
$5-060
1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan prepared
by Charles C. Townes and Associates, dated January 8, 1985,
and the textual statement submitted with that plan, shall be
considered the Master Plan. (P)
2. Ths property shall be zoned as follows:
a. Residential [R-15) zoning shall be as depicted on
the applicant's Master Plan, plus the 3.03 acre
parcel fronting Ramblewood Road which includes the
existing golf course clubhouse.
b. Residential (R-12) zoning shall be as depicted on
the applicant's Master Plan plus= all property
lying between that line, the two (2) stub roads
and the interior northeast/southwest road, plus
One lot depth in Tract A, adjacent to the R-15
The remainder of the property shall be zoned
Residential (R-9).
(Note: This condition supersedes all re~erences
made in the Textual Statement and Master Plan to
cluster, townhouses and/or apartments.) (BS)
3. The R-9 tract shall be developed in accordance with
Residential (R-9) bulk rec~/irements. Tbs density shall not
exceed 2.36 units per acre. (P)
4. The A-12 tract shall be developed in accordance with
Residential (R-12) bulk requirements. The density shall not
exceed 2.80 units per acre. (BS)
5. The R-15 tract shall be developed in accordance with
~esidential (R-15} bulk requirements. The density shall not
exceed 2.0 units per acre.
6. If the developer wishes to provide recreational facilities,
they shall be provided for use hy the entire development.
The location shall be conveniently accessible to Tract A.
The exact locution shall be determined at the time of
schematic plan review. The recreation tract shall be
developed in accordance with the following requirements:
a. Two (2] tennis courts shall be constructed in
conjunction with the first fifty (50) dwelling units
and shall be operational prior to release of the
fiftieth (50th) occupancy permit.
b. A swimming pool shall be constructed in conjunction
with the first 75 dwelling units and shall be
operational prior to release of the 75th occupancy
permit.
c. Th~ recreational facilities shall be buffered from
proposed residential tracts and adjacent properties
with vegetation, berms, f~ncing or a combination o£
these treatments. A Specific buffer plan shall be
submitted for approval in conjunction with ~chematic
plan review.
d. Parking shall be provided at a ratio of four (4) spaces
£or each tennis c0urt, plus one (1) space for each
ninety (96) squar~ feet of combined swimming and wading
area. (P)
(Note: The ~oning Ordinance requires that driveways
and parking areas be paved.)
85-061
7. Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed in all parking
facilities and on both sides of the proposed seventy (70)
foot right of way and around driveways, parking areas and
road frontage of the recreational tract. (EE)
8. Culvert capacity enlargements and accompanying downstream
improvements onto properties to the north and south shall be
bonded, and easements executed prior to recordation Or
release of building permits. (EE)
9. Roadside ditches along Old Bermuda Hundred, Golf Course and
Ramblewood Roads shall be relocated per VDH&T requirements.
(EE&T)
10. stub roads shall be provided to Tax Map 117-16 (1) Parcels 2
and 3 and Tax Map 134-3 (1) Parcel 8 and Tax Map 117-16 (1)
Part of Parcel remaining of this tract. (T}
11. Turn lanes shall be constructed along Old Bermuda Bundred
and Golf Course Roads at all intersections with public roads
into the project. (T)
(Note: This condition supersedes Textual Statement, II.
Condition
12.. A forty (40) foot buffer shall be maintained along Golf
Course and 01d Bermuda Hundred Roads. This buffer shall
exclusive of any utility easements. The buffer shall be
maintained in its natural state and shall be supplemented
with additional landscaping, fencing or berms where
necessary to effect a proper screen. Other than public
road~, there shall be no facilities located within these
buffer~.
(Note: This condition supersedes Textual Statement, II.
Conditions, 4.)
13. Ne clearing, grading, grubbing and/or timbering operation
shall be permitted until drainage plans are approved by
Environmental Engineering and necessary off-site easements
are required. (BS)
Ail foundations and fireplaces shall be constructed of brick
er brick veneer.
The existing pond on Tract A shall be retained. (DS]
14.
Vote:
10.C.1. REQUESTS FOR BINGO AN~/OR RAFFLE PERMITS
Mr. Applegate stated during the lunch hour a request had been
made to the Board to add an emergency item to 10.C.i., Requests
for Bingo and/or Raffle Permits. On motion of Mr. Daniel,
seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board suspended the rules to take this
emergency matter under advisement.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. ~ayes, the Board
approved the request for a bingo and/or raffle permit for the
calendar year 1985 from the Knights o~ Columbus, Bishop Ireton
Center Council 36189 because of the emergency nature of the
issue.
Vote: Unanimous
11. ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
85-062
adjourned at 6:30 p.m. to a work session in Room 502 of the
Administration Building on February 13, 1982 at 2:30 p.m.
Vote: Unanimous
L. Hed~imk
County Administrator
85-063