Loading...
10-11-1989 MinutesOCTOBER 11, 1989 Er. G. ~. A~legats, Chairman Mr. C. F. Currin, Jr., Vice Chairman Mr. Harry G. Daniel Mr, Jess~ J. Mayee Er. M. ~. Sullivan County Administrator Staff in Att~dm~¢e Asst. to CO. Admin. Asut. Co. Ad, in., Inter~overn. Affairs Clerk to the Board Chief F. W. Dolezal, Asst. Chief, Fire Chief Robert Eanes, Dir. of Planning Mr. Robert Masd~n, Deputy CO. Ad, in., Pit. of Chief Roy ~epart2~en~ ~eputy Ce. Admin., ~:. ~ay S~egmaisr, Mr. Apple~ate called thc mauting to order at 2:I0 p.m. (~T) in tho Administration ~uildinq Conference Room (Room 502). He noted Mr. May=s had u conflict in scheduling and ~ould be arriving at the meeting shortly. ~e ~ntroduoed Delegate John Watkins who was present to discuss the GraySen Co~ission Report which would be hear~ later during the ~ekin9 out of order since Mr. May~ world be late. 1. WORK SESSIONS 1.D. 1990 HEALTH CARE PLaN Mr. Ramsey stated the purpose Of the work session was to 89-895 provide the Board with information relative to several issues, the first being the 1990 ~ealth Care Plan for County and Sckool employees and retirees. ~e stated no action was necessary at this time; however, during the regularly scheduled me.ting the Board would be requested to vote to authorize the County Administrator to sign contracts for those plans as outlined at this ti~e for the 1990 program. Mr. Willis presented a summary of information concerning the proposed contract(s) with health care providers for the County's health care proqram for the 1990 calendar year, major factors affecting the 1990 recommendations; recommended rates and actions necessary to contmenoe the employee open enrollment process, the termination of the Key Care Plan by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia, current rates versus proposed rates, comparative contribution levels for staff and the County; etc. Discussion, questions end comments ensued relative to the health care plans available; plan rate differentials; the percentages of increases in the plan rates; differences in the plan benefits and levels of cost; how much fending was allocated in the budget per employee for health care costs; if the budget could withstand an increase in the percentage of family coverage paid; the reason for Key Care not being offered employees due to the continuing decline in enrollment and medical claims exceeding expenses; the level of satisfaction of employees with their health care plans as revealed by the survey; etc. Mr. Stegmaier presented a brief summary of the financial impact to the County of the loss of the Key Care Health Care Plan. He stated that there is a County and Schools combined estimated shortfall of $436,000 which will need tO be prorated and allocated to County and Schools and absorbed in the current year's budget. It was generally agreed the Board would consider action on the 1990 Health Care Plan during the regularly scheduled meeting. Mr. Daniel requested that data be provided ~elative to budget constraints if the County were to increase its percentage of costs provided for family coverage and stated he felt if the County desired to hire quality staff the County would have to bear more of the cost of insurance. Mr. Ste~maier stated that information would depend on the contribution, could potentially increase the County's portion by approximately $20-30 per number of participants enrolled in family coverage and would cost approximately $200,000 per year. Mr. Willis indicated staff would continue, in preparation for 1991, to investigate the possibilities for a dual or triple option plan and review the potential for a self-funded third party administrated program and to continue to monitor progress on the possibility of County and School Board employees joining the State's health care program. 1.A. BRIEFING ON GRAYSON REPORT Delegate John Watkins stated the C0m~issi0n on Local Government Structures and Relationships was established by the 1986 Virginia General Assembly and has been continued by subsequent sessions to conduct a detailed analysis of local government in Virginia. He stated the Commission has released its prelimin- ary recommendations for public response which he summarized for the Boardl copies of which were distributed to the Board for their perusal. Mr. Mayas joined the meeting which was already in progress. There was discussion relative to the responsibilities of the Cozmuisslon on Local Government; the incorporation of towns; the transition of towns to cities; the transition of second-class cities to first-class cities; the transition being voluntary $9-896 rather .t~an mandatery~ transition of counties to cities; the reversion of a city ~o town sUe%us; the settling of connty, city and town boundaries; the consolidation of governmental unihn; incentives fox joint undertakings; the effect of consolidation on distribution of State funds; the replacement o£ the annexation process by a non-judicial system which allows municipalities to expand their boundaries np tO a certain amount at fixed intervals by ordinance with ~in~mum revie%-; Mr. Applegate requested that MrS, DeNart and Mr. Micas monitor this issue closely to remain abreast of all ongoing dialoque. Delegate Watkins stated that additional data wi1! be brought forward to the Board in the future for review so that a recommendation for direction may be forwarded to th~J~. It was. generally agreed to recess for two minutes. 1.C. CONT~CT TO PURCHAS~ WATER FRO~ CIT~ OF RICHMOND Mr. $~1e introduced Mr. Welchons, Director of Utilities for Chesterfield County, and Mr. ~erry Johnson, Director of Utilities for the City of ~ichmond, who presented a brief over- view of the proposal to ~n~e~ into a contract to purchase water from the City of Richmond. ~r. Ws!chons stated the existing joint water contract between Che~teriield and Richmond provides for each te supply water ~o =he other on an as needed as avail- able basi~ and ~xpi~e~ NoVember 30, 19~9. Ne stated staff has been negotiating wi~h the C~ty for a new contra~ to purchase a guarantee ef up to 23.6 million gallons per day (MGD) peak flow in the City's water system with the option to purchase addi- tional capacity and that the proposed contract continues in effect until notice of termination i~ given in advance by for the County te pay the City the pro-rated share of facili- County and also provides tbs methodology for calculating thu initial rate will be thirty two cents ($0.32) per one hundrud cubic feet Ioof) and ranges to $0.3~ per ccf over a ten year period. ($0.38 per ccf is a~ual to $0.51 per 1000 gallOn~). ~h~ Board generally agreed contracting aa pnrcha~e water from the City of Richmond would be beneficial to the County; that it poundnsnt con~spt and negoti~tien~ toward that goal. 1.D. UTILIZATI©~ OF PAC/C~G~D WA~T~WAT=R TREATMENT SYSTEMS presentation on the Utilization of Packaged Wa~tewater Treat- ment ~ystem~ ~ntil a future date. SESSION On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr, Coffin, =he soard went into ~xecutive Session fo~ consultation with legal counsel pursuant to H~ction 2.1-344 (a) (7) of th~ C~de of ~irqinia, 1950, as amended, regarding (1} C~unty e~ Chesterfield~ Virginia, versus Metropolitan Ca~h Register Systems, inc., in the Circuit Court of the County of Chesterfield, Law Nc. CL89-585; (2} the Appeal of Dominion Real Estate Investor~ from i~s special ~ss~$sment for the construction of sewerage 89-g97 facilities in the Route 1/301 Sewer Assessment District; (3) Wilton & Napier versus Board of Supervisors, in the Circuit Court of the County of Chesterfield, Chancery No. (4) probable litigation between the Eoard of Supervisors and School Board involving the. use of school facilities and pursuant to Section 2.1-344 (al (3~ of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, (5) to discuss the condition, acquisition or use of real property for public purposes. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Sullivan advised the Board that he has a financial interest in a corporation involved in da~ care programs, declared a conflict of interest pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act relative to probable litigation between the Board of Supervisors and the School Board involving the use of school faoilitie~ and excused himself from the Executive Session. Pertaining to the probable litigation between the Board of Supervisors and the School Board involving the use of school facilities, as discussed in the Executive Session, it was on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currin, resolved that the Board adopt the followinq resolution: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day adjourned into Executive Session in accordance with a formal vote of the Board, and in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WBEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act effective July 1, 1999, provides for certification that such Executive Session was conducted in oOn£ormity witk law. NOW, TEER~FORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Supervisors does hereby certify that to the best of each member's knowledge, i) only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements under the Freedom of Information Act were discussed in the Executive Seesion to which this certification applies, and ii) only such public business mattsrs as were idsntified in the Motion by which the ~×ecutive Session was convened were heard, discussed or considered by the Board. No member dissents from this certifi- cation. The Board being polled, the vote was as follows: Vote: Mr. Daniel: Aye. Mr. Sullivan: Abstention. Mr. Mayes: Aye. Mr. Currin: Aye. Mr. Applegate: Aye. Pertainin9 to consultation with legal counsel pursuant to Section 2.1-344(a) (7) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, regarding (1) County cf Chesterfield, Virginia versus Metropolitan Cash Re~iste~ S~stems, Inc., in the Circuit Court of the County of Chesterfield, Law No. CL89-585, (2) the Appeal of Dominion Real Estate Investors from its special assessment for the construction of sewerage facilities in the Route 1/301 Sewer Assessment District, (3) Wilton & Napier versus Board of Supervisors, in the Circuit Court of the County of Ch~ster- field, Chancery No. CE89-1105, and pursuant to Section 2.1-344(a)(3) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, (5) to discuss the condition, acquisition or use of real property for public purposes, as discussed in Executive Session, it was on motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, resolved that 89-898 the Board adopt the following resolution: WHE~AS, the Board of Supervisor~ ha~ %his day adjourned into Executive Session in accordance with a focal vote of the Board, and in accordanc~ wi~h the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information A~t; end WEEP~AS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act effective July 1, 1989, provides for certification that such Executive Session was conducted in conformity with law. NOW, THEREFORe, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board ef County member's knowledge, i) only public business ma=tore lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements u~der the Freedom of Information AC% were discussed in the Executive Session te which this certification applies, and ii) only such public business matters as were identified in the Motion by which th~ Execu=ive ~ession was convened were heard, discussed or considered by the Board. No member dissent~ from this certlfl- ca=ion. The ~oard being polled, the vote was au ~cllows: Vote: Mr. Daniel: Aye. Mr. Sullivan: Aye. Mr. Mayes: Aye. Mr. Applegata: Aye. 3. DINNER The ~oard recessed at 5:~5 p.m. Cafe for dinner. (~T) %0 tr~v~l to the Sunset 4. INVOCATION Mr. Applegate introduced Chi~ Department who gave the invocation. Roy ~atrick of the Fire A~ERICA Chief Robert L. ~anes, Ct. !ed the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America. 6.A. S=mT~S=K 25, 1989 On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded approved the minutes of September 25, Nays: by Mr. Currin~ the Board 1989, as amended. Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Daniel and ~r. Sullivan. 6.B. ~BF?EMB~R 27, 1989 On motion of ~r. Sullivan, ~conded by ~r. Ceftin, the Board approved the minutes of ~eptember 27, 1989, ~s amended. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Sullivan. Nay~ Mr, ~ayes. ?. COUNTFADMTNTSTRATOR'S COI~K~I~TS Mr. Ramsey introduced Mr. Hammer who crated the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting was presented to Chesterfield County, Virginia for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1988, by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada for the eighth consecutive year. He stated this award is presented to government units and public employees retirement systems whose Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFR's) achieve the highest standards in government accounting and financial reporting. He stated the award would be placed in an appropriate location for display within the County complex. Mr. Remsey introduced Mr. Andy Farmer, recently elected Chairman of the Emergency Medical Services Advisory Hoard, who presented a brief report on the Statewide Volunteer Rescue Squad Association competition, recognized those awards received by the County rescue squads, and stated said awards/recogni- tions are a t~ibute to the efforts of all members of all the County's rescue squad units. 8. BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS Mr. Daniel reported he attended the Opening Dedication Ceremony of Fire Station Number 11 at 5811 Iron Bridge Road in Dale District on October 8, 1989 whieh he felt was most appropriate during the observance of Fire Prevention Week and attended a reception for the Christmas Mother for 1989. He further requested that staff review all public safety procedures and ascertain whether or not the County has adequate procedures in terms of equipment needed to meat the immediate situation and that, if necessary, such recommendations and policies be brought forward to the Board as soon as possible. Mr. Mayes reported he attended the Appomattox Hasin Industrial Development Corporation meeting; the Education Advisory Committee on the Council of Information Management; and the John Tyler/Midlothian campus ribbon-cutting ceremony. Mr. Sullivan reported that John Tyler Community College has moved its continuing education program from the Watkins Annex to a temporary location on Huguenot Road which alleviates the space p~oblem being experiehced at the Annex; attended the Opening Dedication Ceremony of Fire Station Number 4 in Midlothian District at 2601 Robious Crossing Drive which he ielt was most successful; and expressed his appreciation for the many cards, flowers and well wishes he received during his recent hospitalization and commended the professional care services he received while hospitalized at Johnston-Willis Hospital. Mr. Currin reported he attended a Powhatan County Board of Supervisors work session at which there was discussion regarding the installation of a sewer line from Chesteriield County through Powhatan County to provide service to the western portion of Chesterfield from the Michau× Creek area; and also attended an open house ceremony at the ~nen Velunteer Fire Department. 9. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE ACTION~ EMERGENCY ADDITIONS OR C~ANGRS IN TM ORDER OF PRESENTATION Mr. Mayes requested that Item 14.G.6., Initiation of a Reconsideration of the Chester Village Plan and That Portion of the Thoroughfare Plan dealing with Hopkins Road Extended, be added to the agenda. Mr. Daniel requested clarification as to the reason for adding Item 14.G.6. to the agenda. Mr. Mayes 89-900 stated to clarify and correct his vote for the record. Mr. Micas stated that the september I3, 1989 Hoard of Supervi~or~ minutes accurately reilected tho action taken at that time on these issues. Mr. Daniel ~alled for a separate vote on inclusion cf thin item to th~ agenda. On motion df Mx. Daniel, seconded by Mn. Currln, the Board declined to add Item 14.~.6., Initiation of a ef the Chester Village Plan and That Portion of the Thorough- fare Plan dealing with Hopkins Road Extended, to the agenda. Ayes: ~r. ApplegaSe, Mr. Currin, Mr. Daaiel and Zr. Sullivan. Nays~ Mr. On motion of Mr. Daniel~ seconded b~ Mr. Currin, th.~ Board received a revised copy of Item 14.E.5., Request for Bingo/~a~fle Permit~ adding reguests from La Societe D~s Voiturs 1530 and the ~rrewgate Athletic A$$ociation~ moved out of sequense Item 16.E.&+~ Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing Issuance cf $41,210,000 in General Obligation Bonds or scud Anticipation Note~ for School Capit~l Improvements, to be heard after Item 14.D.; deferred Item 12.A., Adoption Of Policy for Utilization of Packaged Wastewat~r Treatment Systems until December 15, 19~9; de~erred Item 12.B., Approval of Cooperative Agreement Among Chesteriield, Powhatan, A~ella and Cur~berland Counties and Appoma~ox River Water Authority Jurisdictions for Planning cf Lake Genito Water Impoundment until November 1989; and adopted the agenda, as amended. Vote: Unanimous RESOLUTIONS A~D SPECIAL RECO~NITION~ 10.A. THE HONO~tBLE JOH~ ~. TBOSL~S, UPON RETIREMENT PROM JUVENILE AND DOMESTIC P~LATIQN8 ~OUBT On mo%ion of the Board, th~ following resolution wes adoptedz W~EREA$, A~ter distinguished service in ~he United State~ Navy during World War II, John H. Thoma~ moved to Virginia and served in the Virginia Stats Police for three yea~s; and WHEP~EAS, UDon graduation from the T.C. Williams School of Law at the University of Richmond, $ohn ~. Thomas practlssd law ~n Chesterfield County from 1955 to 1974; and WBEP~AS, In 1974 John H. Thomas was appointed Judge of the Chesterfield County Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court s~here he served a~ Ghief Judge for over ten years; and WHEREAS, Judge Thomas has al~ay~ demonstrated ~enuine =oncern fo= the youth of Chesterfield County and through his leadership hms supported critical ~ervice~ to youth to avoid th~ need for judicial int~rven=ien and incarceration; and WHRR~AS, Judge Thomas has been instrumental in construct- ing and enlarging the current Detention Hom~ as well as in planning the construe=ion of a less secure group home for t~ohbled youths and those in need of services and ~upervision; W~EP~AS, J~dge Thomas estahl~shsd a mo~el special advocate volunteer program in Chesterfield County for n~glect~d children; W~=R~AS, The Honorable John 5. Th~a9 ~etired ~rom his distinguished car~r as a Juvenil~ Court Judge on July 31, 1989. NOW, THE~FO~ BE IT ~SOLVED~ by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County that the Honorable John H. Thomas is S9-901 hereby co~umended for his distinguished achievements in the field of Jurisprudence and for his dedicated services to Chesterfield County, particularly to the youth of this County. AND FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends to Judge John B. Thomas every good wish for success in his future endeavore. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Applegate presented the executed resolution to Judge Thomas, commendsd him for his distinguished achievements and dedicated service to the County, particularly its youth, and wished him well in his retirement. 10.B. RECOGNIZING OCTOBER 8-14, 1989 AS "NATIONAL FIRE PREVEN- TION WEEK" On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: WMEREAS, Children playing with fire is the leading cause of fir~ deaths a~onq the very young, killing three of every ten preschool children who die in residential fires; and WHEREAS, Matches and lighters are what children playing with fire most often use; and WHEREAS, About 75% of U.S. residential fires begin with a match or lighter; and WHEREAS, Teaching appropriate fire safety behaviors to children has proven to save lives; and WMEREAS, The Chesterfield Fire Department is dedicated to the safety of lifs and property of its protected citizens from tke devastating effects of fire and recognize the value of fire safety education, particularly for the very younq; and WREREAS, The members of the fire service are joined by the citisens of this co~%~nity and bnsinessss, schools, service clu~s and organizations in their fire prevention effort~. ~OW, TEaR,FORE HE TT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does hereby proclaim the week of 0ctobez 8-14, 1989, as Fire Prevention Week. This week commemorates the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, which killed 250 people, left 100,000 homeless, and destroyed over 17,400 buildings. AND FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that the people of Chesterfield are requested to participate in activities at home, work, and school, and to remember, as the 1989 National Fire Prevention Week theme suggests: "BIG FIRES START SMALL! Keep matches and lighters in the right handm." Vote: Unanimous Mr. Applegata presented the executed resolution to Chief Robert Eanes and Ms. Cleda M. Parker and commended the Department's dedication to teaching the safety of life and property to protect citizens from the devastating effects of fire. FIRE DEPARTMENT AWARDS CEREMONY Chief Eanes expressed appreciation for the opportunity to recognize the special actions of Fire Department and civilian personnel through the presentation o~ the Fire Department Awards Ceremony, indicating the week of October 8 -1 4, 1989 was designated ag National Fire Prevention Week. He introduced Mr. Roy Patrick, Chief of Administrative Services, who present- ed a brief outline of the special actions which precipitated 89-902 recognition of the following indSviduale: MR. W!LL~A~ C. SIN~LE~AR¥, JR. (POSTHUMOUSLY} FAMILY FOR HIS UNSELFISH DEVOTION TO ~I$ COUNTY, HIS FA~4ILY A~D HIS FELLOWMAN On motion of fha Board, the following remolution was adopted: WHE~AS, Mr. William C. Singletary, Jr., a native oC Charleston, South Carolina and a resident Of ChesterfieI~ County, distinguished klmself while serving hie Country with the U.S. Army in Laos ~urinq th~ 1970'z; and WHEP~EAS, Mr. Siaglatary was decorated by him Co~try fQr valor, ~allan~ry and courageous ac~on under fire whil~ servin~ as a U.5. Army helicopter pilot; and W~EP~AS, Mr. Sinuletary continued to metre his County and Lhe CommOnwealth as a member of the Virginia Army National Guard; and WSEREAS, Whil~ vaeatienin~ with his family near Charleston, South Carolina, Mr. $iAgletary a~ain responded without regard for his Qwn safety to help two individuals struggling for their life in the water; and W~R~AS, Mr. Sin~latary, whi~e saving the life of thes~ two individuale, lost his own life in th~ process. County Soard of Supmrvisors poathumo~mly recoqniz~ th~ hmroic llfe-savlng effort of Mr. William C. Singletary, Jr. and pays tribute to a fellow citizen whome devotion to Country, f~%ily and fello~an se~ an ~x~ple tka~ others wou~d do well to citizens sf Chemk~rfimld County their heart-f~l~ appreciation for ~he ful~ measure of devotion he ~avm %o his County and him he l~ft as an'inheritance. ~f Mr. S~llivan presented the e~ecuted resolution %o Mr. ginql~- %ary's f~ily and exp~esse~ sincerm appreciation fo~ th~ devo- tion and self-sacrifice he gave to his County and him fellow- RECOGNIZING ENON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR 0UTS~ANDING SERVIC~ I~ E~ERG~CY 0P~RATION$ ~O ~HE CITIZENS OF C~ESTERFIELD COUNTY On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: W~EREAS~ The Enon Volunteer Fire Department has been leered as ~he Volunteer Fire company o~ the Year for COnsecutive years~ and WHEREAS, The Enon Volunteer Fire D~part~ent has made individual responses to alarms during the past si~ monthm; and W~ER~A$, The averaqe n%lmber of volunteers per call resp- onding from the Enon Volunteer Fir~ ~epartment for the pa~t months is 1~.25, the largest average number responding per volunteer company in the County; and W~EREAS, The ~non Volunteer Fire Dspar=ment has a total of 58 members on their rotls~ the largemt n~mber of any volunteer company in th% County; and WM~P~AS, The ~non Volunteer Fire Department has a n~mber of firefighterm currently b~ing medically c~rtified ~o provide fir~% re,ponder me~ical s~rvlce ~o County citiz~nm; and S9-903 WHEREAS, The Enon Volunteer Fire Department continues to provide outstanding fire protection to the citizens of Chester- field County in their Fire District. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT R~SOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisers publicly recognizes the contribu- tion of the Enon Volunteer Fire Department in providing out- standing service te the citizens of Chesterfield County and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chester- field County their appreciation for this dedicated service. Mr. Currin presented the executed resolution to District Chief Bruce C. Vecshloni and commended Company 6 for dedicated and outstanding service to the County. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING MR. GERALD W. "CAD" ARCHER UPON HIS RETIREMENT FROM CHESTERFIELD COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Mr. Cerald W. Archer, Senior Emergency Services Di~patcher~ retired from the Chesterfield County Fire Department on May 1, 1989; and WHEP~A$, Mr. Archer has provided over 21 years of quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Fire Department will miss Mr. Archer's dependable and diligent service; and WHEREAS, Mr. Archer has been a dependable influence in the Emergency Communications Center throughout his career with the Fire Department which has grown from an all volunteer department in 1967 tc ifs present 290 salaried personnel and 280 volunteers. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED~ that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisor~ publicly recognizes Mr. Gerald W. "CAD" Archer and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, their appreciation for his service to the County. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to ~r. Archer and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Soard ef Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Applegate presented the executed resolution to Mr. Archer, commended him for his many years of dedicated service , wished him well in his retirement and recognized members Of his family who were present. R~SOLUTIO~ ~COGNI~I~G MIDLOTHIAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR 40 YEARS OF VOLUNTEER SERVICE TO THE CITIZENS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, The Midlothian Volunteer Fire Department was organized on October 13, 1949, by a group of 41 concerned citi- zens meeting at the Midlothian High School; and WHEREAS, The Department operated out of a garage at the then Midlothian High School for the first f{ve years; and 89-904 WH~A$, The present site was purchased and the building Co~str~cted by me~bers and the present station first opened for service in 1955; and WHEP~AS, With three building modifications., the addition of career firefightsrs in 1977 and the subsequent close cooperation of the volunteer and career firefighters, the ~idl0thia~ Volunteer Fire Department has served the Midlo~hian community for 4Q years; and W~EREAS, There are pre~ently 38 active volunteer members who made 5,08Q individual responses bo 900 calls in ~988; and ~I~R~AS, the Doard of Supervisors desires to honor and recognize the Midlothian Volunteer Fire Company for 40 year~ of dedicated service to County NOW, T~EP~PO~E ~ IT K~SOLVSD, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes the contribution of the past and present members of =he Volunteer Fire Depar~en% to the citizens of Chesterfield County an~ ~x=ends on behalf of its ms~rs an~ ~he citizens of Chesterfield County their appreciation and congratulations 40 y~ars of dedicated service. Vote~ Unanimous Mr. Patrick stated th~ executed resolution would be ~ECOGNIZING MR. GEOFFI~E¥ ~. APPLEGATE, C~AIR~LAN., BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, FOR OUTSTANDING EMERGE~CY.AC.~I0~ ON D~CEMBER 198~ On motion of Mr. Daniel, ssconded by Mr. Currin, the Board adopted the following resolution: ~REAS, ~r. ~eoffrey K. Applegate, Chairman of the Board cf Supervisors, on Dece~er 10, 1988 whil~ ~n a hunting trip as a private citizen in a rural ar~a of king william County, dis- covsred a two-story wood frame aingle-f~mily dwelling on fire; and took immediate action to arouse the occupants of th~ house, Mr. and Mrs. Thomas Roans, who were sleeping at the time; and WI~R~AS, Without regard for his own safety, he began to extinguish a ~ire in ~he attic Of the house with buok~t~ water; and WHEREAS, ~is prcmp~ action most likely saved the lives of Mr. and Mrs, Roans and did ~av¢ their home ~rom destruction by fire; WHEREAS, Upon arrival o~ th~ Fire Department, they found the fire under control as a result ~f Mr. Applegate'$ prompt action. NOW, THBR~YOR~ ~ IT ~SOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supsrvlsors hereby publicly r~cognizes her0iu autiuns of ~r. G~o~r~N H. Applegate and on behalf of its m~bers and the citizens of Chesterfield County, their appreciation to him for hi~ unselfish assistance to his Ayes: Mr. Currin, Mr, Daniel, Mr. Mayes and Mr. Sullivan. Abstention: Mr. Applegate. Mr. R~sey presented the executed re~olu%ion to Mr. and co~en~sd him for his courage and unselfish assistanc~ to 89-905 his fellowman. Mr. Patrick presented the following special awards for lifesaving actions, significant acts of accomplishments and meritorious service for volunteer and/or career flrafighter$: AWARD i~ECIPIENT Lieutenant Robert M. Hatton Sergeant Peter C. Svoboda Firefighter William D. Pond Tonja C. Smith Emergency Services Dispatcher Kenneth L. Williams Emergency Servicem Dimpatcher Jane W. Chambers Emergency Services Dispatcher Peggy T. Shoosmith Emergency Services Dispatcher Company 2, Manchester Battalion Chief David L. Palumbo Sergeant Thomas D. Crowell Firefighter Stephen T. Gibson Firefighter Walter G. Williams Company 5, Midlothian Lieutenant Robert P. Avsee Firefighter Edward T. Berry Firefighter Shelley B. Porter TYPE OF AWARD Emergency Medical Services Emergency Medical Services Emergency Medical Services Special Recognition Special Recognition Unit Citation Unit Citation Company 7, Clover Hill Unit Citation Volunteer District Chief Willia~ W. Elliott Volunteer Firefighter Duncan $. Beasley Volunteer Ftrefighter Milton R. Camp Volunteer Firefighter Henry J. Wally Volunteer Firefighter Kim L. Phillips Volunteer Firefighter Brian T. Morris Volunteer Firefighter Richard D. Moore Volunteer Firefighter James M. Strause Lieutenant Joseph M. Thomas Firefighter Steven J. Earhart Firefighter Gerald L. Smith Emergency Services Supervisor Dispatcher Irving Hall Emergency Services Dispatcher Jean McDonnell Emergency Services Dispatcher Tonja C. Smith Volunteer Firefighter of the Year 11988) Career Firefighter Of the Year (1999) Volunteer Company of the Year (1988) Firefighter Larry R. Farmer Firefighter John P. Jones Company 6 District Chief Bruce C. Vecchioni The Board congratulated all on their accomplishments. It was generally agreed to recess for two (2) minutes. 89-906 m There were ne h~aring$ of citizens on unssheduled mat~ers or claims. ]2. DNFFJ~P~D ITF2~S 12.C. AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INT0 A CONSTRUCTION C0~TRACT TO CONSTRUCT A FLOOD WALL AT ERCMWIC~ COURT (STONEHENGE SUB- DIVISION} On motion Of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute necessary documents' to ~nter into a contract with Castle Heights Construction Company in an amount net to exceed $29,900 for the construction of a flood wall a~ 12,000 Bromwich Court, Stonehenge Subdivision; and appropriated $29,900 from the Route 60/147 Drainage District Fund for the construction of said flood wall. 12.D. STI~EET LIGHT INSTALLATION COST APPROVAL DEFERRALS There was brief discussion relative to reazOns for the increased co~% c~ street light ins~alla~ions; addressin~ fncrea~e~ in funding of each District appropriationu during the budget process if the County wore to continue funding strsetlight installation requests; etc. Mr. Sulllv~n stated he ~nd Mr. Noyes wo~ld addzess these oonserns at an upcoming Budget/Audit Committee mootinq. On motion of Mr. Applego~e, seconded 5y Mr. Sullivan, the Board denied the fo!lowing etreettight installation cOSt approvals for the Clover ~ill Magisterial District due to the exorbitant Intersection of Red Chestnut Drive and Red Chestnut Court, $5,870; 2. 12900 R~d Chestnut Drive, $3,9~ 3. Intersection of Pecan T~rracc and Tall Hiskory Drive, $3,002~ 4. Intersection of Acorn ~fll Court and Tall Hickory Drive, $3,007; 5. 12906 Red Chestnut Drive, $2,06~; and 6. Intersection of Tall Hickory court anO Tall Hickory Drive, $4,592. vote: Unanimous 12.E. APPOINTMENTS - DEBRIS ~ANIFEST ABBEALS BOARD On motioo of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Noyes, the Board appointed ~rs. Donna S. Link, Mr. Fred Carrero~ and Mr. John Dyke (Homeb~itdurs Representative} to ~erve On the Debris ~anifest Appeals Board, whose terms are effective immediately and expire October 11, 1992. ~9-907 13. PUBLIC REAPJ~GS 13.A. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TH~ CODE OF TEE COUNTY OF CHESTE~IELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING A NEW ARTICLE V RELATING TO THE SITING O~ SOLID WASTE M~NA~E~ MENT FACILITIES Mr. Micas stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, by adding a new Article V relatin9 to the siting of solid waste management facilities. Be stated the proposed ordinance requires ail solid waste facilities to obtain a siting approval permit from the Board of Supervisors in addition to the normal zoning approval by the Board and the requirement to obtain a permit from the State Department of Waste Management. He stated if the County disapproves the siting, the State would not issue a permit; if the County approves the siting, the State would then consider issuance of a permit through the normal State procedures. There was brief discussion relative to the qrandfathering of existing approved sites; the length of the State process for approval of a permit; eto. Mr. George Beadles stated he felt the proposed ordinance was inaccurately written, that it referred primarily to landfills, and requested the proposed amendment be deferred so members of the industry could review/approve the proposal. Mr. Sullivan stated he felt debris landfills were needed in the County and any delays were significant; however, he felt Mr. Beadles suggestion for deferral to include comment from the industry had merit. Mr. Currin stated he had asked the County Administrator to review/reevaluate the recently adopted Debris Landfill Standard~ and concurred with Mr. Sullivan. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes~ the Hoard deferred consideration of an ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, by adding a new Article V relating to the siting of solid waste management facilities until January 24, 1989. Mr. Daniel requested that, du~ to th~ length of the public hearing agenda items, the rules be suspended to take Item 14.A. out of sequence. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board suspended its rules to take out of sequence Item 14.A., Report from the 1989 "Christmas Mother" on the 1989 Christmas Program. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board moved out of sequence Item 14.A., Report from the 1989 "Christmas Mother" on the 1989 Christmas Program, to bc heard at this time. Vote: Unanimous REPORT FROM THE 1989 "CMRISTMAS MOTHER" ON TME 1989 CMRISTMAS PRO~RkM Mr. Masden introduced Mrs. Robert Claus, the 1989 "Christmas 89-908 ~o~her", who presented a brie~ overview of the 1989 Christmas Pro,ram and u×pressud appreciation for the Board'm past and present support of the Christmas Mother Program as well eD the sxc~llen~ employee support throughout ~ll the County Departments. The ~oard expressed appreciation for the noble and worthwhile services the Chrigtma~ Mother ~rog~am provides to its recipients each year. 13.S. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TH~ CO~ OF TEE COD~NT¥ OF THE COUNTY OF CEESTERFIELD~ I978~ ~$ A~4~NDED, BY EN- ACTI~ S~CTI0N 14.1-12.1 ~LA~ING TO TEE k~QuIk~D USS OF SAFETY EQUIPMEN~ BY OPERATORS OF MOPEDS AND ESTABLISHMENT OF PDNALTI~S FOR VIObATION$ publi~ hearin~ tc consider an amendmen~ ~o ~he County Code relating ~o the required nse of safpty equipment ~y cperatorf of mopeds and the establishment of penalties for violations of sams and that Major Linwood Parrish of the Police Department was present to answer any ~uestions th~ Board mmy have. NO One cam~ forwaxd to speak in favor of or against the proposed ordinance. On motion of Mr. Currin, s~con~e~ ~y Mr. sullivan, the Board adopted the following ordinance: AN O~I~ANCE TO i~4~ND-~ PE~TIES FOR ~IO~TIONS. S= IT O~AI~=D by the Board O~ Supervisors of Che~terfield Connty: (1) Chapter 1~.t of th~ Cod~ of =he County of Chesterfield,, 1978, as amended, is ~end~d by enacting section $~ctlon 14.1-12.1. Required use of ~afe~y ~ui~nt by Ope~a~0rs of ~0p~ds; Penalties for Violaeion. (a) It shall be unlawful for ~ny person to operate a moped, as thae te~ is dsfi~ed in ~eo=ion 46.1-1 o~ the Code of Virginia, 1950, a~ ~ended, on a public str~%t or hig~y Qf the County, uulus$ such p=rson shall wear a face shield~ ~afety the Depar~nt of fitate Police or have his moped equipped with safety gla~s or a windshield ~t all times whil~ operating ~he (b) It shall bm unlawful for any operator 0f or passenger on a mop~d, as that term is defln~d in Section 46.1-1 of ~ Cede of Vlr~!~, 1950, as ~ended, to operate or ride a moped on a public street or highway of the County w~thou~ wuaring a pro~e~tlve h~lm~t off a type a~Droved by the ~uperin%endent of the Departmen~ of State Police. (c) Any p~rson who knowingly violates ~is section shall be guilty of a tra{fic infraction and be ~ubjee~ to a fine of not more than fifty dollar~ ($50.00). There was brief discussion relative to the effective date for implementing tho ordinance being JanUary 1, 1990, so that dissemination of said ordinance to the public could be completed. M~, Sullivan amended his motion, ~conded by Mr. Currln, ~o adopt the ordinance as follows: 89-909 CODE OF T~ COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978~ AS AMENDED, BY ENACTING SECTION 14.1-12.1 R~LATING TO '£~u~ ~EQUIHED USE OF SAFET~ ~QUIPMENT BY OPEI{ATORS OF MOPEDS AND ESTABLISNMENT OF PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) chapter ,14.1 of the Code of the C0~nt~ of Chesterfield,, 1978, as amended, i~ amended by enacting section 14.1-12.1, as follows: Section 14.1-12.1. Required ~se of Safety Equipment by Operators of Mopeds; Penalties for Violation. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to operate a moped, as that term is defined in Section 46.1-1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, on a public street or highway of the County, unless such person shall wear a face shield, safety glasses, or goggles of a type approved by the superintendent of the Department of State Police or have his moped equipped with safety glass or a windshield at all times while operating the moped. (b) It shall be unlawful for any operator of or passenger on a moped, as that term is defined in Section 46.1-1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, to operate or ride a moped on a public street or highway of the County without wearing a protective helmet of a type approved by the superintendent of the Departmen~ of State Police. (c) Any person who knowingly violates this section shall be guilty of a traffic infraction and be subject to a fine of not more than fifty dollars ($50.00). (d) This ordinance shall be effective on January 1, 1990. Vote: Unanimous 13.C. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHeSTeRFIeLD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY REENACTING SECTIONS 8-58(A) AND 8-59(A) RELATING TO I~E~J~ ESTATE TAX EXEMP- TIONS FOE REHABILITATION OF HISTORIC LAMDMARKS Mr. Micas stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the County Code by reenacting Sections 8-58(A) and 8~59(A) relating to real estate tax exemptions for the rehabilitation of historic landmarks. There was brief discussion relative to how many designated historic homes were less than 25 years old~ retention of the criteria of fifty (50) years of age for any residential and/or commercial real estate which has been designated as a County historical landmark er is located in an area that has been designated a County historical district before the real estate tax exemption for rehabilitation of said structure would be applicable; etc. NO one came forward to speak in favor of or against the proposed amendment. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, th~ Board denied approval of an ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Cheeterfield, 1978, ae amended, to reenact Sections 8-58(A) and 8-59(A] relating to real estate tax exemptions for the rehabilitation of historic landmarks. 89-910 13.D. TO CONSIDER AN ORDIN~C~ T0 AREND AND REENACT E~CTION 8-17, CODE OF TEE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD~ 1978, AB EXEMPTIONS FOR CERTAIN ELDERLY PERSONS Mr. Mieae stated this date and time h~d been adv~rtise~ ~or public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend and reenact Section 8-17 of th~ County Code relating to the proration of ~eal estate ~ax exemptions for certain elderly No one came forward to ~peak in favor of or against the proposed ordinance. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the ~oard adopted the iollowing crdinanoe~ CODE OF '1'~ CO~ OF C~S~IELD, 197~, ~ ~D, ~TING ~ T~ P~TION O~ ~ ESTAT~ T~ ~TIONS FOR~RTATN KED~y BE IT ORDAINED~ by th~ ~o~r~ of s~p~rvisor~ oE the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, that Section S-l? of %h~ Cod~ of County of Chesterfield, 1978, as ~end~d, is h~reb~ amended an reenacted a~ followm~ Section 8-17. Procedure for claiming ~x~mption. (a) The person or per~on~ claiming such exemption shall ~ile annually with the co~issioner of the revenue of the county, on Porms to be supplied by the county, an affidav%% setting forth the names of th~ ~ela~d persons occupying such real estate~ the total co~ined net worth, includinq equieable intere~t, and %h~ combin~ income from all sourc~s of the r~venue shall also make such further inquiry of persons seeking euch exemption, re~iring answers under oath, as may be reasonably necessary, including ~roduction of certified tax r~turns, to dateline qualification therefor. Such affidavit shall be file~ no= la,er than AD~i1 1 of each year. If such person is under six~y-five (65) years of age such form have attauhed =hure=o a certification by ~e social Security R~ir~m~nt ~ourd, or if ~uch person is not eligible for t~rtification by any of tkese aqenci~$~ a sworn affidavit by ~wo (2) medisal doctors licensed to practice medicine in th~ totally diE,led. The affidavit of mt least on~ I) Of such doctors shall be based upon a physical examine%ion of such person by such doctor. The affidavit of on~ (1) of such doctors may be ba~ed upon medioai informa=ion contained in the S~ch affidavit shell be filed no later than April 1 of each year. (b) Such exemption m~y b~ granted for any year following the date that the head of the household occupying such dwelling and owninq title Or p~r%i~% =itle there=o reached th~ aqe of si~ty-~ive 65} year~. Change~ in respect to income, financial the tax year for which tho affidavit is iiled and having the effect of exceeding or violating the limitations and conditions provided herein shall nullify any exemption for ~he tax yeax i~mdiaeely followinq. The ex~ptlon for the tax year durinq which ~h~ chnnqe occurred shall b~ prorated. Such prorated per%ion shall be determined by mul=iplyinf ~e ~ount of th~ ~mption or deferral by a fra=tion wherein the number complete months of the year such property was properly sligible S9-911 for such exemption or deferral is the numerator and the number twelve (12) is the denominator. Vote: Unanimous 13.E. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 14.1-25 OF THE CQD~ OF THE COUNTY OF CEESTERFIELD~ 1978, AS ~34ENDED,. RELATING TO MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSE REFUNDS Mr. Micas ~tated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to a~end the County Code relatinq to motor vehicle license refunds. There was brief discussion relative to the proposed ordinance amendment prorating funds on a monthly basis in the same manner as the payment of the license tax is calculated; the provision that no refund be less than $2.00 due to the administrative cost of calculating, processing and paying refunds; etc. No one came forward to speak in favor of Or against the proposed ordinance. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayss, the Board adopted the following ordinance: AN ORDINAI~C~ TO A~D SECTION 14.1-25 OF THE CODE OF TRE COUNTY OF C~ESTERFIELD, 1978, A8 AMENDED, ~ATING~O~OTONFEHICLE LICENSE REFUNDS BF IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia that: (1) Section 14.1-25 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended as follows: Sec. 14.1-25. Refunds. Any person holding a current license who disposes of the vehicle for which it was issued and does not purchase another vehicle may surrender the license to the treasurer with a certiiicate from the state motor vehicle co~missioner or other proper state o£ficer, that the state license plates and registration certificates have been surrendered; and request a refund for the unused portion of the tax paid. The refund due under this section shall be prorated monthly commencing with the month following the month in which the license is surrendered and the refund shall be calculated on the basis of one-twelfth (1/12) of the annual license tax for each month remaining in the current license tax year; provided, however, that the treasurer shall not make any refund under this section of less than two dollars ($2.00). (2) This ordinance shall be effective on January 1, 1990. Vote: Unanimous 13.F, TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO ~ND S~CTIO~ 5-22 OF CODE OF THE COUNTY OF C~FSTFRFI~LD, 1978, AS AMENUED, RELATING TO TAXES FOR DOG LIC~N$~ Mr. Micas stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance amendment to the County Code relating to taxes for dog licenses. There was discussion relative to the language of the Board paper b~ing confusing in that it did not outline specifically how the proposed fees were to be used; that fees not be increased just to be consistent with neighboring jurisdictions fees; addressing the matter during the budget process; etc. 89-912 declined consideration of an ordinance to amend Section 5-22 of the Cod~ of the Ceun~¥ of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, address this issue during b~dget deliberations. 13.G. TO CONSIDEE AW OEDINANCE TO Ai~END C~APTER 8 OF TEE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERPIELD~ 1978, AS A~NDMD, BY ADDING A NEW SECTION ~-13.04, RELATING TO MINIMU~ PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX ASM~$$MENT$ Mr. Micas stated this date and time had been advertissd fo: a public k~arlng to consider mn ordinano~ amendment ~o the County Code by adding a new Section 8-13.04 rela~ing to ~inimu~ personal ~roperty tax assessments. ~o one came forward to speak in favor of or against th~ proposed ordinance. On motSon of Mr~ banish, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the ~oard adapted ~he followinG ordinance: CODE 0F TH~ COUNTY OF C~d~ST~P~I~-n, 1978, AS ~ED, BE IT 0~DAI~=D by ~he Board of Supervisor~ of the County (1) Chapter 8 of the Cod~ of th~ C0un~ of Chesterfield, 1~78, as ~e~ded, is h~reby ~ended by addfng a new 8notion 8-13,04 as follo~s: $5.00 ~ollars. (2) This ordinance ~hall be effective on January 1, 1990. OF C~ESTERFI~LD, 197~, A~ AMENDED, ~y A~N~ING AND REENACTING SECTION 2t.1-19, RELATING TO REAPPLICATIONS FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS A~D VkR~A~C~S WITHIN TWELVE MONTHS OF DENIAL Mr. Sale sta~ed this date and ~ime had b~en advertised for public hearing to con~idsr an oxdlnance amendment to the County Code relating to reapplication~ for special exceptions and Mr. B~le~ stated h~ f~lt the proposed ordinance, if ap~oved~ would provide a method to assist zcnlnq enforcement. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board adopted the following ordinance: COBE OF T~ECOUNTy OF ~:.K~IRT~ 1978, AS~, ~IRG ~ ~ACT~G ~ECTION 21.1-19, ~TING TO~PLI~TION~ ~ V~S ~I~IN ~L~ ~8 OF 89-913 BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, that: (1) The Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is hereby a~ended to read as follows: Sec. 21.1-19. Applicatione within Twelve (12) Months. An application fo~ a Variance, Conditional Use, Conditional Use Planned Development, manufactured or Mobile ~ome Permit, Special Exception, Conditional Zoning or a change in zoning for a parcel or lot or part thereof shall not be considered by the Board of Supervisors or the Board of Zoning Appeals within twelve (12) months of denial of a request which was substantially the same as the one made previously. Vote: Unanimous 13.I. TO CON~IDRR AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 21.1 OF TH~ CODE OF TEE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING SECTION 21.1~230, RELATING TO STREET FRONTAGE REQUIP~MENT~ Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend Chapter 21.i of the County Code relating to street frontage requirements. There was discussion relative to fees; road frontage require- ments for both new and/or renewal requests; the lack of road frontage being considered in conjunction with the Board of Zoning Appeals and the Board of Supervisors consideration of a Special Exception and/or mobile home permit request; staff's recommendation that the public road front footage requirement for temporary dwellings such as mobile homes should be considered in conjunction with the consideration of the zoning approval fer the mobile home instead of through a separate application; increasing the fees for mobile home permits with only one application and approval necessary versus payment of two fees with two levels of application approval for such permits; etc. Mr. Daniel stated he could not support approval of an ordinance that would bring forth new mobile home permit requests that do not have public road frontage; however, he could support an ordinance that wo~ld grandfather renewal requests that do not have road front footage in order to eliminate the dual process regarding fees and the approval process; that he felt the ordinance should be more restrictive and be applicable only tO renewal mobil~ home requests. Mr. Micas suggested that the Board may wish to consider amending the ordinance to grand- father all mobile home permits granted prior to January 1, 1988. Ms. Ellen Coleman requested clarification relativ~ to the ordinance amendment process being considered and stated she felt it unfair to have to pay fees every s~ven (7) years for the privilege of living in a mobile home. Mr. George Beadles voiced support for the proposed ordinance as he felt it was more advantageous to citizens. Mr. Micas stated the proposed ordinance does amend the existing language of the current law somewhat and would change it from an absolute public road requirement to a discretionary requirement for the Board. ~r. Currin stated he felt the Board should make the determination for new and/or renewal mobile home permits requests regardless of whether or not the request had road front footage. Mr. Sullivan stated he felt the Board was qualified to make much judgments and was in favor of the ordinance as written as it provided the Board with t-he dlscre- t~onary power to decide each request on a case by ease basis. 89-914 On morion oi Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayer, the Board adopted the following ordinance: ~T~G ~ S~ET FRONTA~ BE IT O~AI~ED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Chapter 21.1 of the Cod~ of ~e County of che~terfield~ 1978~ as ~ended, is amended and reenacted Sec. 21.1-230. Street Frontage ~equired~-Resi~ential and A~ricultural. (a) Unlesm otherwise mpecified and except for farm buil~iugm, no lot outside a subdivision as defined in 18.1-2 shall be used in whole or in Dart for d~elling purposes unless such lot abuts for at leas~ fifty (50) f~% upon street as herein d~fined. NO lo= or parcel of land abutting the terminus of ~ public street shall be deemed, by virtue of such abu~ent, to have it~ principal frontage on a street, unless such Ici fronts for at least thirty (30) feet on an approved pmrmanent cul-~e-~nc. A lot or parcel without ~tr~et frontage may be used for temporary dwelling purposes for which a manufactured or Mobile ~ome Permit or Special g~ception is required; provided, however, that in considering applica- tions for such pe~its and Special Excaptions, in addition %o whether the lot or parcel abut5 for at lea~t fifty {50) feet Ayes: Mr. ~pplegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Maye$ an~ ax. Sullivan. ~ays~ Sr. Daniel. N~W BUSINESS ADOPT ON EMERGENCY RASI~ A~ ~NB~NT TO CHAPTER 14.1 OF THE COUNTY CODE RELATING TO MOTOR VEHICLES AND. SET A DAT~ On mOtiOn of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board the date oi November 8, 1989, at 7:00 p.m., for a public of Chesterfield, Virginia: (1) That the Gods of the County of Chasterfield, I978, as emended, is ~mended by amending the following ~ec~icn: of Virginia, as amended, all of the provisions and requirements of the laws of the state contained in Title 46.2 and Article 2 of Chapter 7 of Title I8.2 of the Cede of Virginia, as in forc~ no application to or'within the county, are hereby adopted an4 in¢orpora=ed in ~his chapte/ by reference and mad~ applicable 89-915 within the county. References to "highways of the state" contained in such provisions and requirements hereby adopted shall be deemed to refer to the streets, highways and other public ways within the county. Such provisions and require- ments are hereby adopted, mutatis mutandis, and made a part of this chapter as fully as though set forth at length herein, and it shall be unlawful for any person, within the county, to violate or fail, neglect or refuse to comply with any provision of Title 46.2 or Article 2 of Chapter 7 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia which is adopted by this section; provided, that in no event shall the penalty imposed for the violation of any provision Or requirement hereby adopted exceed the penalty imposed for a similar offense under Title 46.2 or Article 2 of Chapter 7 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia. Vote: Unanimous 14.C. FUNDING FOR WOODLA~ AThLeTIC COMPLEX RESTR00M/CONCESSION BUILDING On marion of Mr. Appleqate, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board transferred $90,000 from the 1989 Rockwood Park Bond Account to the Woodlake Athletic Complex Account for construction of a combination restroom/concession building at the newly opened Woodlake Athletic Complex. lit is noted that transfer of said funds will necessitate the inclusion of $90,000 in the FY91 Capital ImprOvements Program to restore funds needed for Rockwood Park.) Vote: Unanimous 14.D. AUTHORIZATION FOR COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO CONTRACT WITH HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS FOR THE COUNTY'S HEALTH CARE PROGRAM FOR THE 1990 CALEb/DAR YEAR Mr. Willis presented a brief overview of the Health Care Program ~er the 1990 calendar year and outlined the recommended carriers being considered to provide health cars options for the County and School employees and retirees. Mr. Daniel referenced data he had requested regarding the County's cost increasing to cover 65% of family coverage expense. Mr. Ramsay indicated such cost would range approximately $280,000 annually. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board approved a~d authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary contracts with Equicor Health Plan, Inc., Southern Health Services, PruCare of Richmond and Blue CROSS and Blue Shield o~ Virginia (Dental Plan and M~dicare Extended Plus) to provide health care options for the County and School employees and retirees for the calendar year 1990. Vote: Unanimous 14.E.4. ADOPTION OF A P~ESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF $41,210,000 IN GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OH BOND ANTICIPATION NOTES FOR SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS There was discussion relative to the date when the General Obligation bonds would be issued and that said information be included in the motion; etc. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board approved the following resolution: . A R~$OLU'fION AUTHOP~ZING A~D PROVIDING ~OR TH~ ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF FORTY-ON~ ~ILLION TWO ~D~D T~ THOU~ DO~ ($41,~10,000) P~T~ ~O~ OF P~LIC ~~ BO~S OF T~ ~ OF C~ST~I~, VIRG~N~, ~ PROVID~G WITH ~SPE~ ~ T~ ISSU~ ~ S~ OF A LI~ P~NCIP~ ~O~ OF P~LIC ~RO~ BO~ 89-916 SaI.E OP ~UCH I~ONDS' SECTION 1. Findings and Deracinations'. Pursuant to Chapter 5 of Title 15.1 of the Cods Of Virginia, 1950, as amended Ithe sams being the Public Finance Act), an elsctien duly celled and held ~nder the Public Finance Act in ~he County of Chssterfield, Virginia (the "C0unty"l, on Novsmber 8, 1988 and an Order of th~ Circuit Court of the County dats~ December 8, 1988, the County is authorized to contract debt and issue its general obligation bonds in the thousand dollar~ ($135,9~0,000) for capital school improvemsnts pr0ject~ i~ the Gounty, including the e~quisition of ~it~s for (b) Pursuant to Seution 15.1-189 cf the P~blic to iss~ general obligation bond~ in the principal amount one hundred thirty-flys milklun nine hundred thousand ($135,900,000) for capital School improvement projeck~ in County as authorized by the vo~ers of th~ County at aforementioned election held on Nov~mbsr 8, 1988. (c) As of th~ date hereof, ~ev~nt~un million one hundred ninety-five ~uuaand dollars ($17,195,000) principal ~ount of ~uch general obligation bon~s for capital school the aforementioned election h~ld on Novumber 8, 1988 have been hundred five thoUgand dollars (~118,705,000) principal amount Supervisors deems it advisable and in the best interests of %he sale and delivery cf forty-one million two hundred ten thousand dOllara (41,210,000) aggregate principal ~Qunt of such general obligation bonds fur capital school improv~nt pro3~cts in the in %h~ COunty, as described in Section l(C) he=eof, there are ($41,210,060) principal amount o~ general obligation bonds the County to be Oe$igna=ed and known as "Public Improvement time ~o time in part in serie~ as shall be d~termined by ~e the ~mme time as other genefal obligation bond~ are sold by the per ann~ as shall be specifixd in the bid aecepteO by in accordanae with and s~jmct to th~ provi~ions of thi~ resolution; whether the ~un~s of any serie~ shall b~ in denominations of %he Bonds; the method of n~bering ~u Bonds; the paying aqen% Or paying agents therefor; the place or places therelor; and whether Or not the Bonds shall be subject 89-917 r~demption prior to their ~tatod maturity or maturities and if subject to such redemption, the premium, if any, payable upon such redemption and the respective periods in which ouch premiums are payable. gEC~ION 3. Appointment of Reqistrar; Payment of Bonds; Books of Re~i~_~y;' Exchanges and Transfers of Bonds. (a) Appointment of Reqistrar. Subject to the approval of the Board of Supervisors by subsequent resolution adopted on the date of sale of the Bonds, the County Administrator is hereby authorized to select, for each series of Bonds, the registrar for the Bonds of such series (hereinafter referred to as the "Registrar"), which Registrar may be the County Treasurer. (b) Payment of Bonds. (i) At any tlmo during which the Bonds of any series shall be in fully registered form, the interest on the Bonds of such series shall be payable by check or draft mailed by the Registrar to the registered owners of the Bonds of such series at their addresses as the same appear on the hooks of registry as of tho record date for the payment of interest on the Bonds of such series, and the principal of and premium, if any, On the Bonds shall be payable at the principal office of the Registrar. (ii) At any time during which tho Bonds of any series ~shall be in book-entry fo~m, the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds of such series shall be payable in accordance with the arrangements made with the depository for the Bonds of such series. (iii) The principal of and premium, if any, and interest on tho Bonds shall be payable in such coin or currency of the United states of America as at the respective dates of payment is legal tender for public and private debts. (e) ~oks of,~egist~; Exchanges and Transfers of Bonds. (i) At all tlmes during which any Bond remains outstanding and unpaid, the Registrar shall keep or cause to be kept at its principal office, books of registry for tho registration, exchange and transfer of the Bonds. Upon pro$ontatlon at tho principal office of tho Registrar for such purpose, the Registrar, under Such reasonable regulations as it may prescribe, shall register, ~xchange, transfer, or cause to be registered, exchanged or transferred, on the books of registry the Bonds as herein set forth; provided, however, that the Registrar shall not be required to do so with respect to any Bond after the close of business on the forty-fifth (45th) day next preceding any date fixed for the redemption of such Bond or any portion thereof. (ii) Any Bond may be exchanged st the principal office of tho Registrar for a like aggregate principal amount of Bonds in other authorized principal amounts of the same interest rate and maturity. (iii) Any Bond may, in accordance with its terms, be transferred upon the books 'of reqistry by the person in whose name it is registered, in person or by his duly authorized agent, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar for cancellation, accompanied by a written instrument of transfer duly executed by the registered owner in person or his duly authorized agent, in form satisfactory to the Registrar. (iv) All transfers or exchanges pursuant to this Section 3(c) shall be made without expense to the holder of such Bonds, except as otherwise herein provided, and except that the Registrar shall require payment by the holder of the Bond requesting such transfer or exchange of any tax or other 9Overnmental charges required to be paid with respect to such transfer or e~change. 89-918 (v) All Bond~ ~urr~nd~d pursuant ~o this Section 3(0) shall be cancelled and not reie~ued. SECTION 4. Redemption of Bonds. (5) Provi~ions for Redemption. Subject to the approval of the Board of Supervisors by subsequent resolution adopted on the date of sale of the Bonds, the County Administrator shall determine ~he provisions for the redemption of the Bonds. {b) Notice of Redemption~ ~0%iee Q£ any suck redemption shall be mailed not la~e than thirty {30) days prior fo %he date fixed for redemption by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the registered owner of the Bonds to be redeemed at such owner's address as shown on the books of registry. Suck notic~ shall specify the dat~, numbers and maturitie~ of the Bonds to b~ redeemed, the dat~ and place fixed for ~heir redemption and the premium, if any, payable upon such redemption, an~ if leEE than th~ ~ntirg principal amount of Bond is to be redeemed, that such Bond ~ust be surrendered in ~xchang~ for th~ principal amo~ thereof to be redeemed the issuance of a new Bond ~gualling in principal amount that portloR of the principal amount thereof not redeemed, and shall also stale thai ~pon the date fixed for redemption there shall principal amoum~ ~o be redeemed together with the applicable redemption premium, if any~ and the interest accrued on principal amount to the date fixed for redemption, and that from and after such da=e in=crest on ouch principal amount shall ~ease to of any send ~hall have been given as hereinabove set forth, such Bond (or the principal amount thereof to be shall become due and payable on the redemption date specified in such notice at a price equal to the principal amount thereof and redemption pr~miem, i~ any, thereon~ together wi~h the interest accrued on such Bond (or on qhe principal aalount thereo~ to ~e redeemed) ~o such date. Whenever payment of such redemption pzice shall have been duly made or provided for, £n~eres~ en ~he send (or an the principal amount thereof to be rede~ed) so called for redemption shall cease te accrue from and after the date eo specified for redemption~ (d) Cancellation. Ail redeemed Bonds shall cancelled and not r~is~u~d. SECTION 5. E×eeution ~nd Authentication of Bends; CUSIP Identification Numbers. {a) Execution of Bonds. The sond~ shall he executed in the name of the County by the manual or facsimile signature of the Chairman o~ the Board of SUperVisors, und the corporate s~al of ~he Board of Supervisors shall be. impressed, or a facsimile thereof pfinted~ On the Bonds, attested by the manual Supervisore, neither of which signature~ i~ required to be manual. (b) Authentication o~ ~onds. The County Administrator sh~ll direct the Registrar to authenticat~ th~ Bonds and nc Bund shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose unless and until the certificate of a=thentication 9ndersed on such send shall have been manually executed by an authorized signatcr of the Registrar. Upon hh~ authentication of any Bend, ~he ~egistrar shall insert in the certificate of authentication th~ da~e an of which suQh ~ond is authenticated as follows: {i) if the Bond i~ authenticated prio~ to the £ir~t inter,si payment ~tc, ~he certificate shall be dated as of the date the Bond~ are delivered to and paid for by the initial purchasers thereof; (ii) if the Bond is authenticated upon an interest payment date, the certificate shall be dated am of such interest payment date; (iii) if the Bond is authenticated on or after the record date for the payment of interest on the Bonds and prior to suoh interest payment date, the certificate shall be dated as of such interest payment date; and (iv) in all other instances, the certificate shall be dated t_he date upon which the Bond is authenticated. The execution and authentication of the Bonds in the manner above set forth is adopted as a due and snfficient authentication of the Bonds. (c) CUSIP Identification Numbers. CUSIP identification numbers may be printed on the Bonds, but neither the failure to print any snch number On any Bonds, nor any error or omission with respect thereto, shall constitute cause for failure or refusal by the successful bidder for the Bonds to accept delivery of and pay for the Bonds in accordance with the terms of its proposal to purchase the Bonds. No such number shall constitute or be deemed to be a part of any Bond or a part of the contract evidenced thereby and no liability shall attach to the County or any of its officers or agents because of or on account of any such number or any use made thereof. ~CTION 6. Tax Covenant. The County covenants and agrees to comply with the provisions of Sections 103 and 141-150 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the applicable Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder throughout the term of the Bonds. SECTION 7. Sources of Payment of Bonds. The full faith and credit of the County shall be and i~ hereby irrevocably pledged to the punctual payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as the same become due. There shall be levied and collected annually, at the same tLme and in the same manner as other taxes are assessed, levied and collected, ad valorem taxee without 1L~itation as to rate or amount, sufficient to provide for th~ payment cf the principal of and interest on the Bonds as the same respectively become due and payable. SECTION 8. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be in substantially the form set forth below with such necessary or appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as are incidental to their numbers, interest rates and maturities or as are otherwise permitted or required by law or this resolution: [FACE] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BOND SERIES O? P~GISTERRD No. R- R~GISTERED $ INTEREST MATURITY ORIGINAL RATE : DATE: ISSUE DATE: CUSIP NO: 89-920 .! I%EG I S TE RED O~NER: PRINCIPAL A/~0UNT: The County of Chesterfield (hereinafter referred to as the "COunty"), a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, ~or value received, hereby premises te pay to the Registered Owner (named above), Or registered assigns, on the Maturity Date |specified above), unless this Bond shall have boon duly called for previous redemption and payment e£ the redemption price shall have been duly made or provided for, the Principal Amount (specified above), and to pay interest on suck Principal Amount On I9 and ~miann~ally on each and thereafter from the date hereof or fram the interest payment date next preceding the date of authentiuation hereof to which interest shall have been ~aid, nnless ~ueh date of authentication is an interest payment ate, in which case from such interest payment da~e if interest has b~en paid to such da=e, or unlee~ such dat~ authentication is within the period from [insert appropriate language depending on whether interest payment date is first or fifteenth day ef calendar monkh] to such interes~ pa~ent date, in which case from such interest payment date if interest has been paid tc such da~e, until the payment o~ such Principal A~eunt (each SUCh date is hereinafter referred to a~ an interest payment date) at the Interest Rate (specified a~eve) per annum, by check or draft mailed by the RegiStrar hereinafter mentioned to the Registered Owner hereof at his address as it appears on the books of registry kept by th~ R~gistrer, at the chose o~ business on £in~ert appropriate language depending on ~hether inter,Re payment date is first or fifteenth day of calendar munth]. The principal of sad premium, if any, on this Bond are payable upon presentation and surrender hereof at principal [corporate trust] office of in the City of , (the "Registrar"). The prinuipal of and premix, if any, and interest on this Bond are payable in such coin or currency of the united Sta:es el America as at the respectiv~ ~ates of payment is legal tender for public and privat~ R~F~P~NC~ IS MADE TO T~E FURTheR PROVISIONS OF BOND S~T FORTH ON THE REVERSE ~EREOF, WHICH FURTHER PROVISIONS $~ALL FOR ALL PURPOSES HAVE T~ ~FP~CT AS THODG~ FULLY SBT FORTH HEREIN. The full faith and credit of the County are hereby irrevocably pledged to th~ payment of the principal o£ and interest on this Bond as the same become due. This Bond shall net be valid 0~ obligatory unle~ certificate of authentication hereon shall have been manually siqned by an authorised signatOr of th~ R~gistrar, It is hereby certified, recited and declared that all ~ts, c0n~iticns and things required to have happened~ to exist and to hav~ been perfo~med precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond and the serif@ ef which it is one, dc exist, have happened and have b~¢n performed in regular and due time, and manner as required ~y law, and that this Bond and ~_he Bends of the series of which this Bond is one dO Do~ exceed.any eonsti=utienal or statutory limitation of indehtednesu, IN WITNESS WHEP~EOF, the County, by its Board of Supervisors, hag caused thi~ Bond to be executed by the manual or facsimile signature of the Chairman of such Board; a facsimile of the corporat~ seal u~ such ~oard to be imprinted ~ereon, attested by the manual or facsimile ~ignature of the , 19 89-921 [SEAL] Attest: Clerk of the Board of Chairman of the Board of Supervisors Supervisors Date of Authentication: CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This Bond is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the within-mentioned proceedings. ], Registrar By: Authorized Signator [BACK] COUNTY OF CHESTEP~FIELD, VIRGINIA, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BOND, SERIES OF 19 This Bond is one of a duly authorized issue of Bonds (herein refemred to as the "Bonds") of the aggregate principal amount of Dollars ($ ) oi like date and tenor herewith, except for number, denomination, interest rate, maturity and redemption previsions, and is issued for the purpose of financing the costs of capital school improvement projects in and for the County, under and pursuant to end in full compliance with the Constitution and statutes o~ the Coa~onwealth oi Virginia, including Chapter 5 of Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended (the same being the Public Finance Act), an election duly held in the County under such Chapter 5 on November 8, 1988, and a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County under such Chapter 5 on October 11, 1989. The Bonds of the Series of Bonds of which this Bond is one maturing on or before , shall not be subject to redemption prior to thelr~tated maturities. The Bonds of the series of Bonds of which this Bond is one (or portions thereof in installments of $5,000) maturing on and after shall be subject to redemption at the option Of the County prior to their stated maturities on or after , in whole at any time, or in part from time to time on any interest payment date in such order as may be determined by the County (except that if at any time less than all of the Bends of a maturity are called for redemption, the particular Bonds or portions thereof to be redeemed shall be selected by the Registrar by lot), upon payment of the following redemption prices (expressed as a percentage of the principal amount of Bonds to be redeemed), together with the interest accrued on such principal amount to the date ~ixed for the redemption thereof: Redemption Dates Redemption Prices % %£ this Bond or any portion of the principal amount hereof shall be oalled for redemption, notice o~ the redemption hereof, specifying the date, number and maturity of this Bend, the date and place or places fixed for its redemption, the premium, if any, payable upon such redemption, and if less than the entire principal amount of this Bond is to be redeemed, 89-922 ~hat thi~ Bond mu~t be surrendered in e~shange for the principal amount hereof to be ~edeumed and the i~uance of a new Bond equalling in principal a~eant that portion of the principal amount hereof not redeemed, shall h~ ~aited not less than thirty (30) days prior to the date fixed for redemption by first class mail~ postage prepaid, to the Registered Owner of this Bond st his addre~ as it appears on the books of registry kept by the Registrar. If notice of redemption ~f this Bond ~hall have been given as aforesaid~ and payment oi the principal amount of thi~ Bond (or the portion of the principal amount hereof to be redeemed) and cf the accrued interest and premium, if any, payable upon such redemption shall have been duly made or provided for, interest hereon (or on the portion of the principal amount hereof to be redeemed) shall cease from and after the date so specified ~cr redemption. Subjea= to the limitations and upon payment of the charg~, if any, provided in the proceedings authorizing Bends of the series of which this Bond i~ cue, this Bond may be exchange~ at the principal [corporate trust] office of the Registrar for a l~e aggregate p~iucipal amount of Bonds of the seri~e of which this Bond £s one, of other authorized principal ameunt~ c~ ~he same intere~ rate and maturity. This ~ond is transferabl~ by the Registered Owner heree~, in person or by his attorney d~ly authorized in writing, at hhe principal [COrporate trust] offise of the Registrar but only in the manner, subject to the limitations and upon paymen~ of the charges, if any, provided in the proceedings authorizing the Bonds of the series 0~ which this Bond i~ One, and upon the surrender hereo~ for cancella=ion. Upon such transfer, a new ~ond or Bonds of the series ~f which this Bond authorized dsnominatians and of the same aggreqaae principal amount~ will be issued to the transferee in exchange herefor. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Registrar shall not be required ~o exchange or transfer this Bond later ~han the close of business on the' forty-fifth (45th) day next preceding any date fixed for the redemption of thi~ Bond er any portion hereof. (FORM O~ ASSIGNMENT) For value received, the ~ndersigned hereby sell(s), assign(s) and transf~r(e) unto (Please print or type name and 'address, including zip cOde~ o~ transferee) PLtAS~ INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTNRR TA~ IDenTIFYING NUMBER OF TRANSFEREe: ) the within Bond and all =igh=s thermunde~ and hereby irrevocably constituteu and-appoints , attorney, to transfer each Bond on the books kept for the registration thereof, with full power cf Dated: Signature(s) Guaranteed 89-923 NOTICE: Signature(a) ~ust be (Signature(s) Registered guaranteed by a member firm Owner) cf The New York Stock, NOTICE: The signature(s) Exchange, Ino. or a commercial above must correspond ba~k or trust company, with the name of the Registered Owner as it appears on the front of this Bond in every particular, without alteration or enlarge- ment or any change whatsoever. SECTION 9. Bond Anticipation Notes. Public improvement bond anticipation notes are authorized for issuance and sale by the County in anticipation of the i~suance of the public improvement bonds authorized for issuance herein. Such notes shall mature and be payable within two years from their date and shall be sold at competitive or negotiated sale at not less than par plus accrued interest and on such ether terms and conditions as are determined by the County Administrator. If such notes are offered fo~ competitive sale, a Notice of Sale shall be prepared, published and distributed, and a form of Proposal for purchase prepared and distributed, in accordance with Section 10 hereof. There is also authorized to be prepared and distributed in accordance with Section 10 hereof a preliminary and final Official Statement relating to such notes in such form as ehall be approved by the County Administrator. The issuance and details of such notes shall be governed by the provisions of Section 15.1-223 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. The provisions of Section 6 and 7 hereof shall apply to such notes to the same extent the same apply to the Bonds except, in the caee of the provisions of said Section 7, only to the extent such notes are not paid from the proceeds of the Bonds or from any other available funds. The sale of such notes and the form and other details thereof shall be approved, ratified and confirmed by resolution of the Board of Supervieors of the County. Bonds in anticipation of which such bond anticipation notes are issued pursuant to this paragraph may be issued and sold in accordance ,with the provisions of this resolution at any time within five (5) years of the date of issuance of the first notes issued in anticipation cf such Bonds. SECTION 10. Sale of Bonds. The County Administrator is hereby authorized to cause to be published a Notice of Sale of the Bonds and to cause to be distributed to proepective purchasers of and investors in the Bonds such Notice of Sale, a form of Proposal for the purchase of the Bends and a Preliminary Official Statement of the County relating to the Bonds. SECTION 11. Filing of This Resolution. The County Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to file a copy of this resolution, certified by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to be a true and correct copy hereof, with the Circuit Court of the County of Chesterfield. SECTION 12. Invalidity of Sections, Paragraphs, Clauses or Provisions. If any sect/on, paraqraph, clause or provision of this resolution shall be held invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph, clause Or provision shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this resolution. SECTION 13. Headings of sections. The headings of the sections of this resolution shell be solely for convenience of reference and shall not affect the meaning, construction, 89-924 interpretation or effect of SuCh sostion~ or of this resolotlo~, SECTION 14. Effective Date. Thi~ resolution take e£~sct upon its adoption. Vo~e; Unanimous (It is anticipated that only $16,1S5,000 in 20-y~ar general obldgatien bonds cf the approved amount will be sold between January 1, 1990 and June 30, 1990 and the balance of $25,000,000 will be sold in the subsequent year, in accordance with the Pinancial Plan.) t4.E.1, t~ECONPIPJ~ P~SOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS FROM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~TINGS OF SEPTEMBER 13 AND 27, on motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayas, th~ Boar~ reaffirmed the following resolutions ~i~ce Mr. Sullivan was absent and for ceremonial purposss his name was signed to the 8.A. MR. ~AYE$ ~YNGARDHN, UPON ATTaininG RAN~ OF F~AGLE SCOUT "On ~otien cf ~r. Appleqata, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board adopted the following resolution= W~H~AS, The ~cy Scouts of Amerina Wa~ incorporate~ by Mr. William D. ROyce on February 8, 19t0; and WHiP, AS, The Boy Scouts of America was founded to promot~ citizenship training, personal devulcpment and fitness of indi- viduals~ and W~ER~A~, After earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of fieldu, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a ~ervise Drojsst beneficial to his corm~unity~ being active in the troop~ ~munst~ating Scout ~E~, Hayes Wyngar~en, Troop S94, has accomplished those high ztandards of co~i~nt and has reached the long-sough= goal of Eagl~ Soout which is received by less than two percent o~ those individuals entering the Scooting move- me~t; and WME~AS, ~ruwin~ through his ~xD~isnces in Seoutln~, l=a~ning tke l~ssonS O~ responsible citizenship and priding himself on the great accomplishments of his County, Hayes Wyngarden i$ ind~ a member 0f = nsw generation of predated ~oung citizens of whom we can all b~ very proud. NOW, THE~FORE BE IT ~SOLVED, ~at the Ckssterfield County Boa~d of Supervisors hereby extends its conq~atulation~ to Nayes Wyngarden and acknowledges th~ good for~=~e of th~ County %o have such an outstanding young man as one of it~ 8.B. ALLIED TEC~ICAL CENTER FOR ASSISTANC~ TQ CHESTE~I~LD C0URTX AND LOCAL ~M=RGENCY PLANNING COMMITTEE "On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes~ the Board adopted the following resolution: WNEREAS, The Allied Technical Centsr has assisted Chester- field County by performing chemical analys~ on a n%lK~r of WHEREAS, The Allie~ Technical Center has 89-925 mitigation of hazardous materials situations through these analyses; and WNEREAS, The Allied ~echnioal Center has provided the valuable service at no cost to Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, The Allied Technical Center has consistently supported the Chesterfield County Local Emergency Planning Committee through their consultant efforts. NOW, THEREFOR~ RE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes the outstanding contributions of the Allied Technical Center and expresses on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation for this invaluable assistance to the County and its citizens." 8.C. CHESTERFIELD CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTEES, INC. FOR PROVIDING FINANCIAL SUPPORT TOWAPJD TEE SUMMER CAMP FOR EMOTIONALLY CHALLENGED YOUTH "On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board adopted the following resolution: W~EREAS, One function of the Special Populations Section of the Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation Department is to provide therapeutic programs for emotionally challenged youth of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, The Special Populations Section developed Camp Chesterfield Challenge, a slimmer day camp program specifically for youth with behavior disorders; and WHEREAS, The Chesterfield Child Development Centers, Inc. has generously donated financial support enabling the imple- mentation of this three week program. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT P~SOLVED, that the Board of Super- visors does hereby recognize Chesterfield Child Development Centers, Inc. for its generous contributions. AND, ~ IT FURTSER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does hereby express its sincere appreciation and gratitude to Chesterfield Child Development Centers, Inc. for its community concern and support ~or the emotionally challenged youth of Chesterfield County." 7.A. MR. WOODSON WASEINGTON, UPON RETIREMENT FROM GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT "On motion of ~r. Currin, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Eoard adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, Mr. Woodson Washington will retire from the General Services Department, Chesterfield County, en October 1, 1989; and WHEREAS, Mr. Washington has provided 30 years of quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss ~r. Wasbington's diligent service; end WEERFAS~ Mr. Washington ~has given the County his, loyal~y and support; during the many changes that have taken place zn the County, Mr. Washington never changed in his constancy and devotion to his job and his cheerful willingness to do tasks that might be shunned by others; he has set an example for all to follow. 89-926 behalf of its members and the citizens of chesterfield County their appreciation for hie service to the County. Resolution be presented to ~r. Washington and that thi~ Resolution be permanently recorded ~uong ths papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County~ Virginia." 7.B. MR. L. M. JORN$ON~ UPON RETIREMENT ~ROM UTILITIES DEPART- ~NT "On motion of Mr. Currinr seconded by Mr. Daniel, the BOard adopted the following resolution~ WHEREAS, Mr. L. M. "Bu~ter" $ohnson will retire from the utili=ies Depart-meat, Chesterfield County, on October 1, I989; and W~EREAS~ Mr. Johnson has provided 34 years Of ~uality uervioe =o the citizens cf Chesterfield County; and WI~EREAg, Chesterfield Connty and the Board of Sup~rvisor~ will mis~ Mr. Johnson's diligent service; and W~P~A$, ~r. Johnson was employed by the County as a draftsman and initially ~orked at th~ Department of Taxation 0~fioe in Richmond p~eparlng the property identification maps of the County, which were the basis for the maps used today; he later worked with the development of the he,se numbering ~ystem; perPormed updated work on the maps; and W~R~AS, Mr. John~on~ in the early I960's with the extension of the sewer progr~, worked as a Utilities In,pester un,il 1969~ he then bec~u an Engineering A~i~tant; later he was promoted to chief utili=ies Construction In~pector and during these 16 y~ars, he was respongibl~ for the inspection o~ approximately 1,6~ ~ile$ o~ water and sewer lines. NOW, TME~FOkE SE IT ~SOLVED, that this Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Mr. ~ohBSQ~ ~nd ex=enda on behalf of les members and the citizens of Chesterfi,id County their appreciation for his service to the County. ~D, BE IT FURTHER ~$0LVED, tha~ ~ copy of this Resolutlun b~ prezents~ t0 Mr. Johnson and that thi~ Resolution be pe~anen%ly recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors o~ chesterfield County~ Virginia." Vote: Unanimous ]4.~.2. ~TATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE This day the County Envirenmlental Engineer, in accordance with directions From this Boardr made r~por% in writing upo~ his examination of Huntgate Woods Road, Cove Ridge Road, Cove Ridge Court, Cove Ridge Place, Covc Ridge Circle and Cove Ridge Trace in Cove Ridge, Section I, clover ~ill District. Upon ccnsid~ratio~ whereof, and on ~ot~on of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayeu~ it is resolved that Muntgade Woods Road, Cov~ RiOge Read, Cove Ridge Court, Cove Ridge Place, Cove Ridge Circle and Cove Ridge TraCe in Cove Ridge, Section I, clover Mill District, be and they hereby are eutablished as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary Syetem, Buntgat~ WOOds Road, beginning at existing 89-927 Huntgate Woods Road, State Route 2954, and going westerly 0.08 mile, then turning and goinq northwesterly 0.05 mile to the intersection with Cove Ridge Read, th~n continuing north- westerly 0.01 mile to end at proposed Huntgate Woods Road, Oak Springs subdivision; Cove Ridge Road, beginning at the inter- section with Runtgate Woods Road and going southwesterly 0.04 mile to the intersection with Cove Ridge Court, then continuing southwesterly 0.03 mile, then turning and going southerly 0.01 mile to end at proposed Cove Ridge Road, Cove Ridge Section II; Cove Ridge Court, beginning at the intersection with Cove Ridge Road and going southeasterly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Cove Ridge Place, beginning at the intersection with Cove Ridge Road and going westerly 0.04 mile to the intersection with Cove Ridge Circle, then continuing westerly 0.03 mile to the intersection with Cove Ridge Trace, then continuing wee~rly 0.06 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Cove Ridge Circle, beginning at the intersection with Cove Ridge Place and qoing southerly 0.04 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Cove Ridge Trace, beginning at the intersection with Cove Ridge Place and going southerly 0.04 mile, then turning and going southwesterly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. Thi~ request ie inclusive of the adjacent ~lope, ~ight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage These roads serve 52 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Soard cf Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of these roads. This section of Cove Ridge is recorded as follows: Section I. Plat Book 40, Rages 12 & 13, November 11, 1981. Vote: Unanimous This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Cove Ridge Road, Cove Ridge Terrace and Cove Ridge Lane in Cove Ridge, Section IIr Clover Hill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, it i~ resolved that Cove Ridge Road, Cove Ridge Terrace and Cove Ridge Lane in Cove Ridge, Section II, Clover Hill District, be and they hereby are established a~ public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Cove Ridge Road, beginning at existing Cove Ridge Road, Cove Ridge Section I, State Route number to be assigned, and going southerly 0.09 mile to the intersection with Cove Ridge Terrace, then continuing southerly 0.06 mile, then turning and going southwesterly 0.02 mile to the inter- section with Cove Ridge Lane, then continuing southwesterly 0.06 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Cove Ridge Terrace, beginning at the intersection with Cove Ridge Road and going north- westerly 0.05 mile, then turning and going southwesterly 0.07 mile to end in a cul-de-sac and Cove Ridge Lane, beginning at the intersection with Cove Ridge Road and going southeasterly 0.01 mile, then turning and going southerly 0.06 mile to end at the intersection with Genito Road, State Route 604. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage easements. These reads serve 36 lots. And be it further r~olved, that the Board of Supsrvisor~ guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for ali of ~hese roads. This section of Covs ~idgs is recerde4 am foilow~ Sec%ion II. Plat Book 57, Page 21, May 27, 1987. 14.E.3. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSID~K COURTHOUSE ROAD CORKIDOR PLAN After a bxisf discussion, it wam cn motion of Mr. Sullivan~ seconded by Mr. Maye~ remolved that the Board set the date of ~ov~mber ~, 1989, at 7=00 p.~., for a public hearing to consider the Court/%ouse Road Corridor PIan, Vote: Unanimous 14.E.5. P~QUEST FOR BINGO/RAFFLE PERMIT~ On motion of Mr. Sullivan, meconded by ~z. Mayas, th~ Board approved requests for bingo/raffle psrmits fur fha following organisations for the calendar year as indicated: ORGANIZATION La Sooiete Des 40/8 Voiture 1530 Harrowgate Athletic A~mociation TYPE YEAR BingO/Ra££1e 1989 Bingo/Raffle 1990 Raffle 1989 I4.~.6. ~IDLOT~IAN B~AUTiFICATION PROJECT On motion of ~r. Sullivan, seconded b~ Mr. Mayas, the Board approved the allocation of $3,~0 each from the Clover ~ill an~ ~hs Midlothlan District F¥90 Three Cent Road Fun~ Ace~unts~ for a total of ~6,000, for the Midlothlan Beautiflca~ien Project. (It i~ nota~ the additional allocation of $6,000 [$3,000 from each District Three Cent Road Fund ~eeoen%s] for FYgl and FY92 will be handled through the FYgl and FY92 budget !4.F. APPOInTMeNTS - YOUTR SERV~C=~ CO~ISBION Mr. Daniel requested the rules be suspended to permit nomina- tion/appointmen~ of individual~ to ~erwe on the Youth Services Commission. On motion of Mr. Sullivan; ~econd~d by Mr. Mayas, the Board ~uspen~ed it~ rules to simultaneously nominate/appoint candidates to S~rve on the Youth Services Commim~icn, Vote: Unanimous On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board simultaneously nominated/appointed th~ following persons to serve on the Youth ~ervioes Commission for the District indicated and whose t~rm~ are as indicated: 89-929 BERMUDA DISTRICT Mr. James Suttonfield (Adult) June 30, 1890 Mr. Jason Harbor (Thomas Dale High School) Jun~ 30, 1990 CLOVER HILL DISTRICT Mrs. Lori Malbleib (Adult) Mr. Brian Shenal (Clover Hill High School) Ms. Hillary Harkins (Manchester ~iqh School) June 30, 1992 June 30; 1990 June 30, 1990 DALE DISTRICT Mr. Ronald Lee Briggs, Jr.(L.C. Bird High School) June 30, 1990 Ms. Dawn Rhulen (Meedewbrook Eigh Schooll June 30, 1990 MJNTOACA DISTRICT Mrs. Lois McClellan (Adult - Reappointment for 3 year term) Ms. Andrea Jones (Matoaca Migh School) June 30, 1992 June 30, 1990 MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT Mrs. Dee Dee Lally (Adult-To fill the remainder of a 4-year term vacated by Mrs. Carol Boisineau) June 30, 1990 Reverend Robert C. Sawyer (Adult) June 30, 1992 Ms. Teresa Seyfried (Midlothian High School) June 30, 1990 Ms. Quynh Nhu Doan (Monacan High School) June 30, 1990 Vote: Unanimous It was generally agreed a resolution of appreciation be prepared in recognition of Mrs. Carol Boisineau's service on the Youth Services Commission. 14.G. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS 14.G.1. STREET NAME CHANGE Mr. Currin and Mr. Mayes stated they had received comments from their constituents expressing concern relative to the renaming of Happy Hill Road from Branders Bridge Road east to its proposed intersection with Happy Hill Road Relocated and requested the matter be deferred for thirty day~ to resolve these concerns. On motion of Mr. Ceftin, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board deferred consideration until November 8, 1989, of a street name change for the renaming of Mappy Hill Road from Branders Bridge Road east to its proposed intersection with Eappy Hill Road Relocated. 14.G.2. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION COST APPROVAL On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board approved the cost for street light installation at the intersection of East Hundred Road and Spruce Avenue, Bermuda Magisterial District, in the amonnt of $566 to be Expended from the Bermuda District Street Light Fund. 14.G.3. REQUEST FOR INDUSTRIAL ACCESS FUNDING FROM COLONIAL MAPd3LE PRODUCTS, LTD. ~_ND CUSTOM OPTICS, INC. On motion of Mr. Ceftin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board 89-930 approved =he. following resolution: W~EREAS, Colonial Marble Products Ltd. will ~oon enter into a firm contract to con~truet its facilities in Chester- field County for the Do, pose of producing bath accessories; and WHEREAS, this new facility is expected to involve a new private capital investment in !and, building, and manufacturing ~quipment of approximately $2 miltion~ and WBER~AB, Colonial Karhte Products Ltd. is expected to employ 60 persons at this facility; and WBER~A~, manufacturing o~ratlons are expected to begin at this new facility On or about December, 1990; and WHEREAS, Custom Optics, Inc. will soon enter into a firm contract %c construct its facilities in Chesterfield Co~nty ~or the purpose of producing glass lenses; and WHEREAS~ this n~w facility is expected to involve a new private oapltal investment in land, building, and manufacturing equipment of approximately $2.6 million; and WHER25AS~ Custom Optics, Inc. is expected to employ I65 persons at this facility; and this new facility on or about July, 1990; and WHE~AS, She property on which the=e faciliaies will be located has no access to a p~lic ~tr~e or highway and requires the construction of a new roadway which would connect to Ruffi~ Mil! Road {Route 746): and WHE~AS, Chesterfield County hereby guarantees that the necussary right~of-way for thi~ n~w roadway and utility ~elo=ati~s or adjustments, if necessary, will b~ provided at County Board of Supervi~or~ h~reby requests the Co~onw~lth Transportation Roar~ to provide Indus=rial AcOeSs Road funding facilities. ~ IT ~URTHER ~SOLv~D, that the Chesterfield County Board of S~pervisors hereby agrees tha~ %h~ new roadway so constructed will bu added to and become a part of th~ S~condary System of High~ny~. RESOLUTION CONFIPmMIEG PROCEEDINGS OF CHESTERFIELD INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOk ~$~UA~CE OF ZNDUSTRID-L DEVELOPMENT R~VENUE BONDS FOR KENNETH H. COPELAND, SR. (L~=ASING TO COLONIAL ~A~LE PRODUCTS, On motion of Mr. Ceftin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the ~oard approv=d the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield ("Authority"), has considered application of Kenneth E. Copsland, Sr, ("Borrewer"l requesting the issuance of the Authority's revenue bonds in an amOun~ not to exceed $3,000,Q00 ("Bonds"} to assist in the flnancinq of the ~orrowsr's acquisition~ construction and equipping of a ~omp0~ite material bath fixtures manufacturing facility con- sisting of approximately 84,000 square feet ("Project") to be located two miles east on Exi~ 5 off Interstate 95 and approxi- 89-931 mately one-half mile east of Ruffin Mill Road, in the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, and has held a public hearing thereon on October 5, 1989; and WBEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of private activity bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of private activity bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bends; and WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia ("County"); the Project is to be located in the County and the Board of Supervisor of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia {"Board") constitutes the highest elected governmental unit of the County; and WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board approve the issuance of the Bonds; and W~REAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Ponds, subject to the terms to be agreed upon, a certificate of the public hearing and a Fiscal Impact Statement have been filed with the Board. NOWt THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TME ROARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA: 1. The Board approve~ the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the benefit of the Borrower, as required by Section 147(f) and Section 15.I-I37~.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Virginia Code") to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the Project. 2. The approval of t_he issuance of the Bonds does not constitute an endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bonds of the creditworthines~ of the Project or the Borrower. 3. Pursuant to the limitations contained in Temporary Income Tax Regulations Section 5f.103-2(f) (1), this resolution shall remain in effect for a period of one year from the date of its adoption. 4. The Board directs the County Administrator to request an allocation of the State Ceiling (aa defined in Section 15.1-1399.10 of the Virginia Code) in accordance with the provisioas of Sections 15,1-1399.10 through t5.1-1399.17 of the Virginia Code and the applicable regulations, to cover the issuance of the Bonds. 5. Approval of the issuance of the Bonds, as required by Section 147(f) of the Code, does not constitute an endorsement of the Bonds or the creditworthines~ of the Company, but, as required by Section 15.1-1~80 ei the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, the Bonds shall provide that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to pay the Bonds or the interest thereon or other costs incident thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor, and neither the faith or credit nor the taxing power of the commonwealth, the County nor the Authority shall be pledged thereto. 6. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Vote: Unanimous 14.G.5. REVIEW AND EVALUATE DEBRIS LANDFILL STANDARDS Mr. Currin presented a brief summary of events leading to his request that there be a review and evaluation of the current Debris Landfill Standards and stated he felt the standards were 89-932 too rigid at the present time. Mr. Sullivan he felt such review appropriate sin~ the current standards had been in ~ffeet for more tkan a year end, at fhe time t~ose standards were adopted, it wa~ agroe~ that they would be reviewed at the end of one y~ar. On motion of Mr. Currin~ ~eeonded by M~. Sullivan, thc Roard directed tko County Administrator to establish a committee~ cumpose~ of County ~taff per~onn~l, industry r~pro$cntatives, and envirenmentel scisntist$ a~d engineers, to review, analyze and recommend any changes in fhe Debri~ Landfill Standards and that such report doeumcntinq tho recommendations of this committee shall be presented to the Beard of Supervisors within 180 days. Vote: Unanimous i~.R. UTILITIES ITEMS 14,H.1. CONSIDERATION OF A~gROVAL OF COMTRACT TO PURCHASE WAT=R FROM CITY OF There was a brief d~cu~sion relative to consideration of approval of a contract to purchase Water from the City of Riuhmond~ that such act{on not negate negotiation regardin~ the Lake Genito Water Impoundment: that such action not preclude th= County's entering into further aqreements proposed by the Richmond Regional Water Resources Task Force, ~f it so desired; Mr. Mayes stated he felt i~'would be a seriou~ mistake for the County if if di~ no~ continue to pursue negotiation9 toward the Lake Genito Water Impoundment. On motion of the Board, the Board approved and ~ufherized the County Administrator tO execute any necessary documents to enter into a contract be%ween Chesterfield County and the City of Richmond to purchase a guarantee of up to 23.6 million gallons per day {MGD} peak flow from the City's water system and tO pay the City the pro-rata share of facilities Construct- ed within the City to transmit water to the County, with said contract also providing the methodoloqy for calculating the charge to the County for water purchased, ~hs estimated initial rate being thirty-two cents ($0.32) per one hundred cubic (cci) and ranging to ~0.38 p~r cci over a ten y~ar period ($0.~8 per caf is equal to $0.51 per 1,O0~ gallon~, with said contract ~ubject to approval of the County A~%e:ney'~ office. (It i~ noted the proposed contract continue~ in effect until notice of te~mlnation is given in ~dvancs by either party.) 14.H.2. CO~SENT I4.H.2.a. APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER %1 FOR TWE CONTRACT by IMG which would b~ ~erved by this force main, 4eolazed a approved. Change 0r~er ~untber 1 in the amount of ~154,633.~0 for Contraot 85-7098 Part C '~ Upper Swif~ Creek Force ~ain and this project ~e pay for this pr~ject~) 89-933 Ayes: Mr. Coffin, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Applegate. Mr. Applegate returned to the meeting. 14.s.2.b. APPROVA~ OF WABTEWATEE CONTRACT FOR FOXCROFT SUBDIVI- SION--OUTPALL TRUNK LINE On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board approved the followinq wastewater contract and authorized the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents: 89-0742, Foxcroft Subdivision - Outfall Trunk Line: Developer: Delmarva Properties, Inc. Contractor: Lyttle Utilities, Inc. Contract Amount: Estimated Total - Total EstLmated County Cost: Wastewater (0versizing) - (Refund thru connections) Estimated Developer Cost: Code: (Oversizing) $64,639.90 $34,961.43 $29,678.47 5P-58350-890730 14.~.2.o. APPROVAL OF WATER CONTRACT POR CARTERS MILL/BRANDY OAKS--WATeR LINE ALONG BEACH ROAD On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board approved the following water contract and authorized ~he County Administrator to execute any necessary documents: 88-0311, Carters Mill/Brandy Oaks Water Line along Beach Road: Developer: JJG Development Contractor: Lyttle Utilities, Inc. Contract Amount: Estimated Total - $137,938.00 Total Estimated County Cost: Water (Oversizing) - $ 63,632.00 (Refund thru connections) Estimated Developer Cost: $ 74,306.00 Code: 5E-58350-890732 Vote: Unanimous (Oversizinq) 14.~.2.d. APPROVAL OF UTILITIES CONTRACT FOR MIDLANTIC BUSINESS C=NTER~ BELMONT AND WHITEPINE ROADS On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board apDroved the following Utilities contract and authorized the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents: 89-0299 - Midlantic Business Center Belmont and Whitepine Roads: Developer: MVP Limited Partnership Ltd. Contractor: Coastline Contractors, Inc. Contract Amount: Water - Sewer - Estimated Total - Total Estimated County Cost: Water (0versizing) - (Refund thru connections) Wastewater (Oversizing) - (Refund thru oonneetiona) Estimated Developer Cost: Code: $216,555.00 $291,213.00 $507,768.00 $ 51,441.58 $ 16,305.35 $440,021.07 Water (Oversizing) - 5H-58350-890732 Wastewater (Oversi~ing) - 5P-58350-890730 Vote: Unanimous 89-934 14.H.2.e. APPROVAL OF DEVELOPER WATER LINE PARTICIPATION AGREE- ~NT FOR EXTENSION OF PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM ALONG ROUTE 6O On mo%ion Oi Mr. Coffin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Beard approved Water Participation Agreement Numbsr 89-0746, reflecting participation from the Developer, Jamestown InternationaI~ Ltd,~ for extension of the public water system along Route 60 (Project ~88-0100) which will provide water ~e~vice to the property now known as Ivymont. Square ~hoDping Center, which agreement provides for the develeper to reimburse tho County un estimated cost o~ $76,52S.70 within l0 days upon completion of that portion of the County's pro3ect and which participation reflects the cost of ~xten~ing an equivalent water line from Sycamore Square Shopping Center along across Rout~ 60 to this property~ a~d authorized the County Vet~: Unanimous 14.H.2.f, APPROVAL OF A QUITCLAIM DEED FOR A WATER EASEMENT ACROSS PROPERTY OF EDWIN D. AND ROSA LEE GR~GOR¥ On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, th~ Board approved and authorized t~e Chairman of the Board and the Ceunty Administrator to execute a Quitclaim Dee~ ~o vacate a 16 1/~' water ~as~men~ across the property of Mr. E~win D. and Mrs. Rosa Lee Gregory, which easement was acquired in conjunc- tion with the Route 10 Road widening Project. |It is noted a copy of eaid plat is filud with the papers of this Board.) Vote~ Unanimous APPROVAL OF AN A~REBM~NT WIT~ VIRGINIA DEPARTMEET OF TRANSPORTATION FOR F~ELOCATION AND BETTERMENT OF UT~LITIES ALONG RO~T~ 10 BETW~EW CHIPPEN~24 ~ARKWA¥ AND JESBUP ROAD Qn motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by ~r. Sullivan, the Board approved a~ A~reem~nt with the Virginia Department of Transportation for relocation and betterment of ntilities (the r¢iocation ~nd b~tter~en~ of water lines and relocation of sanitary ~ewer lines) along Route 10 ha%ween Chippenham Parkway and Jessup RO~d (Project Numbers $9-05fi~ and 89-0735) and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary document~ on behalf of ~he County, subject to the agreement being approvs~ as to ~erm by the County Attorney. (It is noted funding for this project is from thm approved FY '89-~90 Capital Improvements Budget and the State i~ responsible for 72,4% of th~ water line cost and 100% of the sanitary sewer line cost, with the remaining cost being paid by the t4.Z. I{EPORTS Mr. Ramsay presented the Board with a status report on the G~naral Fund Contingency Account, Qeneral F~nd Balance, Road Reserve Funds, District Road and Street Light ~unds, Lease ~uruhaaes, School Board Agenda and ~inutes, and the Board Ptt~lim ~earing Schedule. 89-935 15. ~D JOURI~4EI~ On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by M~. Mayes, the Board adjourned at 10:00 p.m. (EDT) until 9:00 a.m. (EDT) on October 25, 1989. Lane B. Ramsey County Administrator 89-936