Loading...
01-11-1989 MinutesMINUTES 11, 19~9 Mr. G, H. Appleqate, Chairman Mr, C. F. Currin, Jr. vice chairman sr, Harry G. Daniel Sr. Jesse J. Mayss Mr. M. B. Sullivan Mr, Lane B. Ramsay County Administrator Staff in Att~dance~ Mg. Amy Davis, Exec. Asst. to Co. Admin. Mr. william Diggs, Real Ms. Joan Dolezal, Clerk to the Board Chief Robert Eanes, Fire Department Mr. Eradford s. Ha~zmer, Deputy Co. Admin., Management Services Mr. William H. Howell, Diz., G=n. Sarvice~ Dir. of Planning Mental Health/Retard. Dir. of Accounting Dir. of Env. Eng. Mrs. Pauline Mitchell, Dir. of Wews/Info. Col. Joseph Pittman, Chla~ of Police Dir. of Utilities Mr. Frod~r~¢k Willis, Mr. R~msey called the meeting to order at ~!05 p.~. (EST) in =he Conference Room (Room 502) of the Adminietrasion BUilding. 1. ORGANI2~%TIONAL M~RT~NG 1.A. ELECTION OF C~AIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN Mr. Ra~y stated the first order of bnsiness ~ould ba the ~lection of Chairman for 1989, Mr. Hayes nOmln~ ~r. Daniel for Chairman for 19~9. ~X. Sullivan nominated M~, Applegate for Chai~an. Thmre were no other nominations. The vu=e for Mr. Dani~! as Chairman for t989 was as fellows; 89-t Ayes: Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mayes. Nays: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin and Mr. Sullivan. The vote for Mr. Applegate as Chairman for 1989 was as fellows: Ayes: Nr. Applegate, Mr. Currin and Mr. Sullivan. Nays: Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mayes. Mr. Applegate expressed appreciation to the Board for the confidence expressed. Mr. Applegate stated nominations were open for vice Chairman. Mr. Sullivan nominated Mr. Currin as Vice Chairman for 1989. There were no other nominations for Vice Chairman. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr, Applegate, Mr. Currin was elected Vice Chairman. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Currin expressed appreciation to the Board for the honor bestowed upon him. APPOINTMENTS OF COMMITTEES Mr. Applegate stated he was not prepared at this time to make the necessary appointment of committees and would like to defer the matter until January 25, 1989 and it was generally agreed to do so. 1,C, SET DATES OF REGULAR MEETINGS On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. sullivan, the Board set the second Wednesday at 7:00 p.m. and the fourth Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. of each month for Board meetings, with the exception of July, August when only one meeting will be scheduled for the fourth Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. and December when only one meeting will be scheduled for the second Wednesday at 9:00 a.m., as follows: January 11, 1989 at 7:00 p,m. January 25, 1989 st 9:00 a.m. February 8, 1989 at 7:00 p.m. February 22, 1989 at 9:00 a.m. March 8, 1989 at 7:00 p.m. March 15, 1989 at 7:00 p.m. March 22, 1989 at 9:00 a.m. April 12, 1989 at 7:00 p.m. April 26, 1989 at 9:00 a.m. May 10, 1989 at 7:00 May 24, 1989 at 9:00 a.m. June 14, 1989 at 7:00 p.m. June 28, 1989 at 9:00 a.m. July 26, 1989 at 9:00 a.m. Work Session (July-August) August 23, 1989 at 9:00 a.m, September 13, 1989 at 7:00 p.m. September 27, 1989 at 9:00 a.m. October 11, 1989 at 7:00 p.m. October 25, 1989 at 9:00 a.m. Movember 8, 1989 at 7:00 p,m. November 22, 1989 at 9:00 a.m. December 13, 1989 at 9:00 a.m. And further, the Board set the date of March 15, 1989, at 7:00 p.m., at Manchester High School for a public hearing to consider nominations for the Clover Hill District School Board representative. It is noted work sessions shall be scheduled for ths second Wednesday of each month at 2:00 p.m., or as necessary, with a specific schedule of work sessioa topics, dates, and the decisions/issues that must be determined by the Hoard to be provided by the County Administrator. Vote: Unanimous MX, Applegate excused himself from the meeting. 89-2 Mr. R~sey presented information relative to dates and topics for proposed work session~ various ether Board meetings and/or Mr. ADDlegate returned to tbs meeting. After a brief di~cu~icn~ the Board tentatively schedule the following: WORK SESSIONS: February 8, 1989 March 8, 1989 {2~00 p.m.]: April 12, 1989 (2:~0 p.m.): Other Scheduled MeetinGs: January 25, 1989: February 2, 1989: February 8, 19~9~ February 19-21,t989: April 5, 1989: (Late April, 19~9, Adoption of Budget; 1989, Adoption of ~chool Board Budget) ge~rally agreed to TOPICS: Manifest System, Budget Budget, Major Amendments to soning Ordinances Budqet, Emergency Medical Work Session VML-VACO Day Social Services Board Work Session Board of Supervi~or~ Retreat Budget and Tax Rate Public H~aring and prior to May 1.D. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES OF TN~ BOARD OF There was discussion relative to ~he procedures governing the Board of supervisors meetings, with suggested modifieat~oDs and/or or clarificatiO~ requested regarding sections related to tie votes, expansion of ~he r~cordati~n of minu%es~ the Board taking ~tem$ Out of ~equence by suspsnslon of rules and vote versus such action being at the discretion of only the Chairm~n, w~o dotermines whether ur net any ~att~r not on the scheduled aqenda ~ay be heard on the day of its introd~¢~ion, On mo~ion of Mr. Mayes, secund~ ~y Mr. Ceftin, the Board adopted the Procedures for Governing Meetings of ths Board of Supervisors, as amended, a copy of which is tiled with the papers of this Board.) 2,A. STUDY ON BMERQENCY ~DICAL SERVICES continuation and expansion of volunteer participation~ adoption of a public policy by the Board of Supervi~or~ for the support medical services; increased fundinq for recruitment; joint financial incentives for long-term servlee; flexibility in training hours and a public education program to ~$1st in fund medical services to include the de~iqnation of ~he Fir~ Chis£ by th~ Board of Supervisors as the individual responsible fe~ 89-3 of emergency medical services in the County; rescue operations, staffing; communications; training; medical control; etc. The Board commended the consultants for a comprehensive, well-prepared report and generally agreed that, based on the information presented, that staff should take the following steps: Arrange for the leadership from the Rescue Squads to have the opportunity to review and comment on the study and meet with the consultants, if necessary, to understand the -recommendations; Arrange a working group with the appropriate Volunteer Rescue Squad staff, County staff, Medical Directors and anybody else %ha% is involved in that group to address what plans can be implemented that would work toward eliminating coverage downtime and improve patient care with no costs to the Volunteer Rescue Squads and the County; Based on the study, an imple~mentation plan be prepared by April 30, 1989, noting any budgetary impacts; and Current Rescue Squad Medical Directors and County's Medical Director review the report for recommendations at this level, with efforts at this l~v~l to be coordinated at the appropriate time with the other involved groups. On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board suspended its rules to take the Executive Session out of its regular sequence on the agenda and to add an additional item for discussion. Vote: Unanimous On motion of Mr. Currin, sesonded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board resolved to take Item 3., Executive Session prior tu Itsm 2.B., Work Sessiou~ Study of Development Policy and U~e of Public Water and Sewer; and to add an additional item for discussion relating to the results of the investigation of the Ettrlck-Matoaca Rescue Squad Report, pursuant to Section 2.1~344 (a) (6) ef the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board went into ~xecutive Session to consult with legal counsel regarding Edwards versus Mize and Fisher versus Kidd and Thompson Avenue, and to discuss the condition, acquisition or use of real property for public purposes and for consultation with legal counsel regarding the results of the investigation of the Ettrick-Matoaca Rescue Sguad Report, pursuant to Sections 2.1-344 (a) (6) and (2) and (6}, respectively, of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Vote: Unanimous STUDY OF DEVELOPMENT POLICY AND USE OF PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER Mr. Sale presented a brief overview of the scope of service for a study of County development policy and the use of public 89-4 wa~er and sewer which ine~u~e~ a description o~ development patterns within the Ceunty and present utility add growth policies, an analysis of the long-term effects of the present utility and growth pollci~s, and an analysis cf the effect of possible changes in the County's pre,eat utility and growth policies. Discussicn~ questions a~d comments ensued relative ko costs of staff performing the study versus specialized consultants; bh~ delay of other on-going studies to acco~oda%e completion of the proposed water/sewer study; wh~ther or not t~ amend th~ existing sewer policy; the number cf upcoming rezoning requests for approval with non-public utility ~er=ices; that there is sufficient documentation relative to well ~ailures and/or contamination in Chesterfield County that all ~ubdlvi~ioms ~hould provide public water facilities; the effect and/or impact of public ~ewer connections for ~ubdivisions on the County's water resources; addltienal so~rce~ of water r~$ource$; the timeframe for needing additional water resources; etc. After further discussion, the majority cf the Board felt that approval of future rssldentlal rezoninqn r~quire public water facilities; and further, with respect to the sew~ study, that information be provided indicating th~ number of $~wer failures that have o~curred since the inception of the u~e of two s~ptic tank/drainfield systems, a listing of all the ~ubdlvisicns that have been sewered under the capital expenditure Drofile of.the County over the last ten (10) years by density and how many septic systems exist on the site; e map indicating exiptinq sewer ~zith designations of anticipated extensioa of sewer for the next one (1), three (3) and five 15) year perio~ end if an ordinance is n~oe~sazy ~c implement the pending recommendations that a draft ordinance be provided with appropriate information; that staff study the ramifications of other growth counties sash as Prince William~ Pairfax, Henrico~ etc., that hav~ impl~mente~ similar types of policy systems, particularly utility management, to determine the system's impact on tho~ area~; the fea$1bility of establishing a policy for labeling as to amenities ~ueh as public facilities, roads, what he is buying; and that the long-term adequacy of onsite sewer/waste ~i~posal versus cffsite sewer/waste disposal, if County, and a professional engineer to discuss these issues with thc Board to provide a better understanding of th~$e 4. Tavern for dinner. ~r. A9plegate called the regularly gchsduled m~ting to order at 7:10 p.m. (EST). INVOCATION Applegate introduced ~r. Frederick W. willis, who gave the 89-5 6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO -rn~ FLAG OF -r~u~ UNITED STATES OF A~E~ICA The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United states of America was recited. 7. Ai~P~)~KALOF MINUTES 7.A. DECEMBER 12, 1988 On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board approved the minutes of December 12, 1988, as submitted. Vote: Unanimoue 7.B. DECEMBER 14~ 1988 On motion o£ Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved the minutes of December 14, 1988, as amended. Vote: Unanimous 8. COUNT~ ADMINISTRATOR'S CO~[ENTS Mr. Masden introduced Dr. John Pasture, Chairman of the Henricus Foundation Board of Trustees, who presented the Board with a plaque recognizing the Henricus Foundation as the recipient of a first place award in the "Take Pride America" competition in Virginia, which award was presented at an Awards Ceremony in the Government Administration Building at the State Capitol. Mr. Ramsey introduced Mr. John Tye, Deputy Director of the Chesterfield Real Estate Assessors Department, who was recently elected President of the Virginia Association of Assessing Officers and commended him for this outstanding achievement. ~r. Ramsey recognized Mr. John T. Hewitt, Right-of-Way agent, who was recently installed as State President of the Old Dominion Chapter 52 of the International Right-of-Way Association and commended him for this outstanding achievement. 9. BOAPd) CO~ITTEE i~EPO~S There were no Board Committee Reports at this time. 10. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE ACTION, E~ERGENCYADDITION$ OR C~ANGES IN T~ ORDER OF PRESENTATION On motion of Mr. sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board deleted Item 15.F.2., Consider Condemnation Proceedings for a Sewer Easement for the Route 10 Widening Across Property of Mr. Mark L. and MS. Wands L. Seamster; added Item 15.E.6., Set Date for Public Hearing on Posting of Signs on Tentative Subdivisions; added Item 15.E.7., Pay-For-Growth Committee Report; Amended Item 12.A., with the speaker being changed from Ms. Polly Eggleston to Mr. John Harris to address the matter regarding the Construction of Gateway Farms at the Corner of Reedy Branch and River Roads; and added Item 15.E.8., Regarding Route 288; and adopted the agenda, as amended. 89-6 ll.A. DECLARING F~RUARY AS "HEART MON~E~ On mo=ion of =he Soard, the following resolution was adopted: health problems~ and Virginians; and Reart Association eontlnue~ to lead the fight againet this together in this v~%al Undertaking every year to improve our odds of dying from this dreaded ~iaease which is currently "Heart Month" in Chesterfield County, calling attention to the problem of heart ~issase and the Rishmond Metropolitan Council of the American ~eart Association'~ role in its solution and urges its fellow citizens to support the work of this AND, FURTR~R B~ IT R~$0LVED, That the Chesterfield County Council of the American ~eart Association for their efforts to at a luncheon ~n late January. ll.B. ~R. JAMES D. ~USTIN, ETTRICK-~TOACA BASKETBALL PROGRAM On motion of the ~oard, the following re~olutien was adopted= WHeReAS, The Chester£1~!d County Parks and Recreation Department strives to offer quality recreational yoUt~ sports programs; and WHEP~AS, The ~ttrick-aatoaca Youth Basketball League has been provid±nq ~he youth of Chesterfield with a quality ~HEREA~, As its Cammissioner~ Mr. AUStin devoted his and efforts to the program to see that ~ve~y ehil~ had a chance to play~ and WH~R~A~, ~r. Austin's dedication a~ a Referee, Coach and Co~issioner set the standard for others to foll~ in ord,: hay= a successful program. ~OW, THE~PO~ BE IT RESOLVED~ ~mt th~ Chesterfield Couuty Board of Supervisors do~s hereby recognise Mr. Jame9 Aumtin for his outstanding se~vice to youth sports and the Ettrick-Matoaca Y~uth Basketball League. AND, B~ IT FURTHER ~SOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors does hereby express it~ 89-7 appreciation and gratitude to Hr. Austin for his commitment to youth sports. Vote: Unanimous Hr. Applegate presented the executed resolution to Hr. Austin and recognized family members who were present. ll.C. ~R. JIMMIE RICKMAN, CHESTERFIELD QUARTERBACK LRAGU~ On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted; WHEREAS, Th~ Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation Department strives to offer quality youth sports proqrams; and WHEREAS, The Chesterfield Quarterback League has been providinq the youth of Chesterfield with a quality youth football program; and WI~EREAS, As its Cor~llissioner, Mr. Rickman worked diligently to improve ths League through his dedicated efforts to achieve rules for ~afety and fair play; and WHEREAS, Mr. Rickman, both as Coach end Commissioner, devoted many hours of his time to the betterment of youth sports and was a leader in demanding coaches training opportunities. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors does hereby recognize Mr. 31mmic Rickman for his outstanding service to youth sports and the Chesterfield Quarterback League. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors does hereby express its sincere appreciation and gratitude to Mr. Rickman for his commitment to youth sports. Vot~: Unan~ous Mr. Applegate presented the executed resolution to Mr. Eickman and recognized family members who were present. 12.A. MS. POLLY HGGLESTON~ REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF GATEWAY FARMS AT THE CORNER OF REEDY BRANCH AND RIVER ROADS Mr. John Harris, Chairman of The Concerned Citizens Action Group, submitted petitions with approximately 435 signatures of registered versts to the Board expressing their concerns regarding Section 21-142 of the Zoning Ordinance that permits Group Care Eacilities in residential and/or agricultural districts. Ms stated members of the group feel that locating such a facility in an area that is predominantly residential would have an adverse e~£sct on property value and neiqhborhood security, that such permitted u~e~ by right do not allow any citizen input in regard to the~e facilites and requested consideration be given to the deletion of that section from the ordinance. After a brief discussion, it was qenerally agreed it would be appropriate for staff to review the mattsr and forward a recommendation to the Board for consideration. 89-8 12.E. MR. ROBERT ~. $CHREFFLER~ P~GAHUING PROPOSED WIDENING OP widening of Route 10 through Chester, its impact on the Village atmosphere, th~ future north-~outh development of Route 144 to Chester from the interchange of Route 2S8 presently under Construction, proceeding with the proposed widening of Route 10 When asked, Mr. McCracken indicated a series of 9ubl±e meetings and hearings had been held regarding this matter, the Virginia Department of Transportation had purchased nearly all of the necessary right-of-way and ia preparing for ¢onstructlon to begin in the Spring of 1959, was not certain what could be done 13. DM~PG~B ITEMS 13.A. REZONIN~ REQUEST 88SN0045, TEDCO-EQUITI~-NORT~GAT~, CLOV~R H~LL DI~TRiCT $85~004~ (Amended) In Clover Hill Magistsrlal District, T~DOO--EQUITIES-NORT~GATE requested amendment to Conditional Us9 Planned Developments (caste 74S~21 and $5S002] %0 permit use exceptions. A shopping Center is planned. This request lies in Office Business (0), a~d Light Industrial ~M-1) Districts on a 53.0 parcel fronting approximately 2,~56 feet Ou the north line of Hull Street Road, also fronting approximately 2,448 feet on the southwest line of ~arbour ~cinte ~arkway, and located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of these roads. Tax ~ap 61-16 {1) Parcel ] and Part of ~arc~ls 1 and 5 (Sheet 20). Mr. Jacobsen stated since the Board's da~erral o~ this case et its October 26, ]988 meeting, the applicant had submitted a r~quemt to with~r~w the application. Mr, Applegate noted that certain revise~ information was to have been subrditted by the applicant no later than D~e~mb~r I9~8, for ~ur~her review and ~ha~ chat direction was not complied with. There was no one present in Opposition to the request for withdrawal, OD motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded hy Mr. Daniel, the Board accepted the re~uest of the applicant ~or withdrawal of Case 85SN0045. 13.B. PUBLIC HEARING TO ~ON~ID~R AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE ROUTE 1/301 SE~R ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Er, Micas state~ the Board de~erred c~naideration of the public hearing to consider an ordinance to establish the ~oute l/S01 Sewer A~sessment D~strlsf from itc December 14, 1988 ne~tinq at the request of a representative o~ Me. Susan g. Swing, owner of the larges~ parcel in the proposed district, tc provide opportunity to further study the ramifications of the impact of this proposed dietzict on their Droperty. H% ~tated Ns. Ewinq'$ representatives have investigated and studied the 89-9 proposed district and have advised staff that Ms. Ewinq opposes establishment of the sewer assessment district in its present form and at its proposed a~e~sment rates. Mr. Bill Walsh, representative for Dominion Real Estate Investors, stated his client was not in opposition to the proposed sewer assessment district but did not wish their property to be included in the district if it wsre established. He presented a history of the acquisition of the property, submitted copies of reports and Assignment of Sewer Agreements relative to the subject parcel, stated his client feels that to included their property would place a financial hardship On development of the property, etc. Mr. Norman Long distributed a letter to the Board containing information that extension of sewer to the subject property would not be of any benefit to said property. Mr. Daniel inquired if the applicant's parcel were omitted from the district, would the applicant be agreeable to installing sewer on demand. Mr. Welsh stated he was not authorized to make such a commitment and would have to contact his client. There was further discussion relative to the impact of the establishment of the proposed sewer assessment district on Dominion's property, the existing Assignment of Sewer Agreements, etc. Mr. Gibson Wright voiced support for the proposed assessment district indicating that without the cooperation of Dominion Real Estate Investors, other properties in the area would be unable to develop, and stated other property owners would be amenable to an increase assessment, if necessary, to obtain sewer. There being no one else to address the matter, Mr. Applegate closed the public input. In response to Mr. Daniel's question, Mr. Welsh stated he had contacted the managing partner of the partnership who indicated he felt it would be in the best interest of all concerned and less expensive if the County were to construct the sewer line from the trunk line through the subject parcel and that they be permitted to pay their pro rata share of the cost over the same period of time and at the same rate as other developers. After further discussion, it was on motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Daniel, resolved to adopt the following ordinance: AN O~DINANCETOESTABLISH 'r~ ROu'r~ 1/301A IlEA SPECIAATAX OR ASSESSMENT SEWER DISTXLICT, TO CONSTRUCT CERTAIN SEWER FACILITIES T~REINt AND TO IMPOSE CERTAIN TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS UPON OWNEP~ OF PROPERTY LOCA'r~u3 TH~KEIN BY ENACTINGARTICL~X, CHAPTER 20 B~ IT ORDAIneD by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That ~he Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended and reenacted by adding to Chapter 20 a new article, Article X, as follows: Article X. Route 1/301 Area Special Tax or Assessment Sewer District Section 20-189. Deflnitiens. In the context of this Article, the definitions contained in this section shall be observed and applied, except when the context clearly indicates otherwise. District. "District" means the "Route 1/302 Area Special Tax Or Assessment Sewer District." 89-10 Map o£ the District. "Map of the District" means the map entitled "Route 1/3D1 Area ~ewer Assessment District" prepared by County of Chesterfield Department of Utilities, dated October 3~ 1988, which map is on file with th~ Director oX Utilities. ~ection 2Q-~90. sstabiishment of Route 1/30! Area Specie] Tax or Assessment Sewer District. Pursuant to Sections ~'5.1-239' e% sag. cZ the Oode ~f Virginia, 195~, as amended, there is hereby created in the County the Route 1/301 Area District shall be an~ the same is hereby flxsd within the SeG~lon 20-191. Construction of Certain Sewer Facilitle~ in and Ad~acen~ to the District. The Utilities Departmeo~ shall cause to be constructed in and adjacent to the District the sewer lin~ and appurtenant facilities depicted on the Map of tAe ~atrict. Section 20-192. Tax~E Or Assessments UpOn Owners ~rope~ty Located Within %he District. The cost of construction of the sewer line and appurtenant faciiit{es loaated within the District shall be apportioned among the owners of property abutting the sewer line. The amount of the tax or charged to eauh such owner of abutting proper%y shall be in th, sar~s proportie~ to the total cost of the imprQvements constructed within the District pursuant to Section 20-191 the asreaqe located within the District which is owned by the ~butting property owner boars to the total acreage in th~ District. The a~ount finally ta~ad or assessed against each landowner shall be reported to the treasurer as ~oon as practicable after ~ompletiae of the sewer line and ~ppurtenant facilities looate~ within the District, and the treasurer shall Section 20-193. Installment payment of a~sessments_ Any p~rscn against whom an assessment provided ~or in thi~ Article X has been finally made shall pay the full amount e~ an assessment ~rovlded for in this Article X, on the dhe date of the first tax bill on which such assessment is uhewn. In no event, however, shall any part of th~ assessment bu due prior to th~ completion of the sewer line and appurtenant facilities constructed pursuant to this Article k. As analternative' to payment a~ provided above, a person against whom an assessment provided for in this Arti~l~ X has been made may pay such assessment in twenty equal semi-annual principal installments over a period of lO years, together with simple interest on the ~npaid principal balance at the rate of 8 percent per annu~ The first of s~ch installments shall he due on and inter,st on the unpaid principal balance shall accrue from the date on which the full amOUnt of the assessment would otherwise have been due as provided above. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Outran, ~r. ~aniel ~nd M~. Sullivan. Nays: Mr, Mayes~ a~ he f~lt ~here was a eont~¢.tual o~ligation between the County and th~ property owner with respect to the I972 Sewer OESTRUCTIO~ OF POULTRy Mr. Micas stated at lis ~ecem~ar 14, I~88 meeting the Board deferred consideration of a reguest from ~. Sen Linge~f~lt for background information relative ~o a request for compensation for destruction of poultry in the amount of $12,400 based on the slaimant's assessment of their value as fighting gamebirds; explained briefly the legal provision for compensation avail- able to any ~itizen who ham peultry dmstroyed by dogs ~unning Mr. Charles Beddow, representing Mr. ~ingerfelt, stated he had reviewed the report regarding this claim; stated there is no evidence that Mr. 5ingerfelt was engaging his gamebirds in any type of illsgal activity when his flock was destroyed by dogs; that there is no public policy against cockfighting in Virginia; that the legality of cockfighting is irrelevant to the law reqarding the Code provision to compensate an individual for the destruction of poultry by dogs running at-large; that the gameblrds destroyed were brood stock - not fighters and were raised to replenish his flocks; cited additional information from other experts in the state; and stated he had come prepared to compromise the financial value of the qamebirds as a satisfactory settlement. Mr. Philip Clauer, an Extension Poultry Specialist at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and ~tate University, explained his credentials, the request by the County Attorney's Office to review the claimant's list cf destroyed birds; kis recommenda- tion which he felt represented a fair market value of the birds for non-cockfighting activities; e~c. There was further discussion of the Board's obligation to protect the use of the sitlzcns' money, support of thc County Attorney's recommendation, that the Board has a responsibility net only to protect the ~axpayers' money but also to protect citizens that are harmed, that the claimant's value of $12,400 was unsupportable but that a compromise may be posslbl~, ets. On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved payment of the claim, in the amount of $6,200, to Mr. Ben Lingerfelt as compensation for the destruction of poultry (33 gamebirds) which were destroyed by three dogs on his property on March 21, 1984. Vote: Unanimous 13.D. APPOINTMENTS - COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, ths Board appointed Dr. Sanford Schwartz, representing the Midlothlan District, to ~erve on the Chesterfield County Co,unity Services Board, whose term is effective immediately and will expire December 31, 1991. Vote: Unanimous 14. POBLIC ~RING8 14.A. THE PROHIBITION OF ANY TRUCK OR TRUC~ AND TRAILER OR SEMI-TRAILER COMBINATION EXCEPT A PICKUP OR PANEL TRUCK PROM USING IRONGATE DRIVE FROM IRON BRIDGE ROAD TO BEULAH ROAD Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to ConSider the restriction of through truck traffic on Irongate Drive from Ironbridqe Road to Beulah Road. Mr. Steve Nelson, President of the ~engate Civic Association, voiced support for the proposed restriction stating there is an excessive amount of traffic, esDecially trucks, traveling through their subdivision which presents a safety hazard to area children. Mr. ~orge A. Beadles, Jr. voiced opposition to the proposed restriction as he fel~ it is inappropriate to extend roads throuqh subdivisiops to connect to collector roads and then restrict certain types of traffic from using those roads. 89~12 felt that when the p~bllc's health, safety and welfare are endangered the Board should be flexible enough to eon~ider the road. M~. Applegate stated the Board ha~ r~que~ted sta££ ~o discuss amending the criteria for such requests with UDOT. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currin, the following WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors has traffic on Irongats Drive (Route 3025) from Ironbridge Road {Route lO) to Beulah Road IRoute 641) by any truck or truck and trailer or semi-trailer com~ination except pickup or panel WHEREAS~ the Board has conducted a public hearing on the Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation %4.B. %BE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FROM THE BOND PROCEEDS OF $23.9 MILLION AND INTEREST EARNINGS O~ $1.A ~IL~IQN. THE TOTAL OF $25.3 MILLION WILL BE USED AS FOL~0WS~ $18,I0~,000 - SCHOOL ~ROJECTS 2,225,000 - ~U~LIC SAFETY 2,987,D~0 - 9AR~ AND RECRF~TION 684,000 - LIBF~RIES 1,I55,000 - MENTAL HEALTH/RETARDATION 149,~U0 - BONDS ISSUANCE COSTS {~URSUANT TO S~CTI©N 15~1-199 0F TBS CODE OF VIKGINIA) Mr. Stegmaier minted thim date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an appropriation of funds from the hoed proc~g$ cf $23.9 million and interest earnings of $1.4 ~illion, the total of $25.3 million to be used for school projects {$iS,100,0O}, public safety ($2,225,000), parks and recreation ($2~987~000) ~ libraries {$684,000), mental health and mental rekardation ($1,I55,000) and bon~ issuance costs [$149,000), pursuant to Section 15.1-199 of the Code o~ Virginia. M~. Daniel stated he ~ad no problem in appropriating the County f~ds; however, ha felt the S~hooI Liaison Conmmittee needs to meet with ~he School Board again ~efcre he would consent to appropriating any of the bond funds as there is no dafin£tive list of projects. No one came forward to speak in ~avor of or e~einct the matter. Mr. Daniel reiterated his ocmments relative to authorizing the County Administrator to escrow the necessary fund~; however, h~ did have a 9rehlem with approDr±ating any school ~unds until such time as the School Liaison Co~mitte~ has met to clarify certain in~oi-mation. Mr. Daniel mede a motion to approve and authorize the County Administrator to amend the 19~$/89 budget to increase total revenues and expenditures by $25,3~0,000 for the County and School Capital Improvement Projeots~ appropriate f~nds in the ~mount of $7~051t000 for County projects; and defe~ authorization for the appropriation of funds for school 89-13 projects until such time as the School Liaison Com~ittee meets with the School Board. There was nu seoond. Mr. Rameey stated the ~oard had already authorized staff to issue the bonds. Mr. Mayes and Hr. Sullivan stated their comments would be similar to Mr. Daniel's, end they could approve everything except the school projects. There was discussion relative to appropriating monies for school projects prior to having a definitive statement indicating specific needs for funds, options and/or contracts for the purchase of school sites, locations Of potential school sites, contracts, construction schedules; requesting that a representative of School administration be present at Board of Supervisors meetings when school requests are on the agenda; the effectiveness of the School Liaison Committee in providing necessary information; previous instruction by the Board for staff not to proceed with the issuance of bonds without the appropriation process being completed; whether or not appropriation of the subject fund~ would give the School Board authority to enter into purchase contracts; the status of the regional concept for a fire training center, etc+ Mr. Daniel restated his motion to appropriate fund~ in the amount of $7,051,000 for County projects. There was no second. Mr. Applegate suggested the matter be deferred until January 25, 1989, in order to resolve the concerns expressed regarding school projects. Mr. Daniel stated he would agree if, et that time, staff provided data relative to financial plans for the appropriation, contracts and/or options to acquire sites indicating whether or not there is sufficient funding to achieve their goals in terms of school acquisition, school construction, etc., and information relative to basic fundamental money management. There being no one else tO address the matter, Mr. Applegate closed the public hearing. After further discussion, it was on motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, resolved to defer consideration of an appropriation of funds from the bond prooeeds of $23.9 million and interest earnings of $1.4 million, the total of $25.3 million to be used for school projects ($15,100,00), public safety ($2,225,000), parks and recreation ($2,987,000), libraries ($684,000), mental health and mental retardation ($1,155,000) and bond issuance costs ($149,000), pursuant to Section 15.1-199 of the Code of Virginia until January 25, 1989; and that ~taff bring back data for the Board's review relative to financial plans for the appropriation, contracts and/or options to acquire sites indicating whether or not there is sufficient funding to achieve their goals in terms of school acquisition, school construction, etc., and information relative to basic fundamental money management. Vote: Unanimous 14.C. TO CONSIDER THE APPROPRIATION OF A $598,200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT TO RESA~ILITATE 40 0WNER-OCCUPIED HOUSES TO SECTION 8 STANDARDS AND 15 INVESTOR-OWNED OR RENTAL pROPERTIES IN T~E E~LLWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider the appropriation of a $593,000 Community Development Block Grant to rehabilitate housing in the Bellwood community. On motion of Mr. Currin, secouded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board appropriated $598,000 from a Community Development Block Grant 89-14 from the ¥irgi~ia Department of Eousing and Community Develegment to ~ehabilitate 40 owner-occupied houses te ~Cfieu 8 standards and 15 investor-owned or re~taI properties in the ~ellwood community. 14.D. AN ORDINANCE TO k~END CHAPTER 12 OF THE COD~ OF COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, A~ A~ND~D, BY ADD~NG SECTION 12-25 RELATING TO PAYMENT OF BUSINESS LICENSE TAXES 1N INSTALLMENTS Mr. Mica~ state~ th~ da~e and time ha~ bean advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend Chapter 12 the County Code relatinq tO tho payment of business llcenss taxes in installments. Mr. Nelson B~nnett voiced support for the a~endme~t to permit the payment of business license taxes in two installments yearly_ Th~ ~a$ nO opposition present. On motien of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board adopted the following ordinance: 1978, ~ ~ED, BY ~DING SE~ION 12-25 ~TING ~ T~ PA~ OF BUS~S~ T~ IN~ST~S BE IT 0~AINED by the Board of Supervi~or~ of Chesterfield (1) That Chapter I~ of the Code of the County uf Chester- field, 1978, as ~ended~ is amended to add Section 12-25 r~lating to %he payment of busine~ license ~xes in install- .sec. 12-2~. s~e. InBtallment ~a~ment. this chapter as of the first day cf any license eax year, if fifty dollars ($5Q.00) or mo~, eh~n that agqreqate ~ount of license taxes may be due and payabl~ as follows: One-half thereo~ on the first day of th~ license tax year and one-half of that aqgregate be not paid ~ithin on~ (1) calendar month a~ter ~he beqinning of ~u license tax year, the whole of that aqgregate of license taxes ahall become due and payable on ~irS5 day of the second mon~] of ~e license tax year. There shall be added to the entire license tax a penalty of ten (10) per annum on the tax and penalty from the flr~t day of s~on4 month of the ~icens~ tax y~ar to the date of the assessment thereof until paid shall be added, and th~ shall collect the whole amount of ~he aggregate of license taxes, penalty and interest in the manner prOv~d~ by law. last day of the first month of the license tax year and the last hal~ on the aggregate of ~nch license ta~e~ bu not p~id or before the thirtieth day of the Sixth month of the licen=e tax year, a penalty of ten (10) p~cent on the tax of the last hal~ of the aggregate cf such taxes and interact om =he half of th~ aggregate of ~uch licen9~ taxes and penalty, at rate of ten (10) percent p~r ann~ from the first day of the s~xth month of the license tax year until payment, shall be added by th~ treasurer Co the ~ount due and not paid and shall collect s~ch taxes, penalti~ and interest in th~ provided by law. 89-15 Vote: Unanimous 15. NEW BUSINESS 15.A. CONSIDER APPROPRIATION OF GRANT FUNDS FOR GROUP HOME FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH AUTISM There was discussion regarding the establishment of a group home for adults with autism--the project being the first Of its kind in Virginia; the scheduled date of operation; start up costs and rmspite care; etc. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board appropriated a total of $31,000 in Grant Funds ($28,000 for startup costs and $3,000 for respite care allocated in the FY89 Eudget) from the Virginia Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse for the establishment of a group home for adult individuals with autism, which undertaking is the first of its kind in Virginia, is scheduled to begin operation in July, 1989, and will be a public-private endeavor, utilizing Virginia Department of Mental Health/Mental Retardation/Substance Abuse funds, a private home, the programming expertise of Grafton Bchools and the oversight of the Chesterfield Community Services Hoard. (It is noted funding for this p~ogram will be included in the FY90 Budget and the annual operating costs will be $226,000; sOurCe of funds include $102,000 in new initiative funds earmarked for Chesterfield, $92,000 in Stat~ DMHMRSA Special program funds, and $14,000 in Supplemental Security Income (SSI) f~em the program residents; and further $18,000 in new initiative funds allocated to Chesterfield County will be set aside in the FY90 Budget for the cost to Chesterfield Mental Health/Mental Retardation/Substance Abuse for administering and monitoring of the program.) 15.B. SET A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY AT THE AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL PARK TO SCANCENTER VIRGINIA, INC. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayer, the Board set the date of January 25, 1989, at 9:00 a.m., for a public hearing to consider an amendment to variou~ contractual obligations and the restrictive covenants for the conveyance of property at the Airport Industrial Park to ScanCenter Virginia, Inc. 15.C. COnSeNT ITgMS 15.C,1. ACCEPTANCE OF DEED OF GIFT OF ONE-HALF ACRE PARCEL OF LAND NEAR RENRICUS PAR~ FROM VIRGINIA L.A.D. COMPANY.,. INC. Mr. Currin disclosed to the Board that he is a stockholder in the Virginia L.A.D. Company, Inc., declared a conflict of interest pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act and excused himself from the meeting. Mr. Applegate stated he had received a letter from the applicant requesting a thirty day deferral of this matter to resolve concerns that had ~nrfaoed. There was no opposition to th~ request for a deferral. On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board deferred consideration of the acceptance of a deed of gift of 89-16 one-half acre parcel of land near Kenrieus Park from Virginia L.A.D. Company, Inc. until February 8, 1999. Ayesz Mr. Applegate, ~r. Daniel, Mr. ~ayes and Mr. ~ullivun. Absent: Kr. Currin. Mr. Currin returned to the meeting. 15.C.2. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE This day ~he County E~vironmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Sir Sagamore Drive, Ex~aliber Place, Sir Saqamore Court, Sir Dinnadan Court, Sir Lionel Plac~ and Sir Lionel Court in Kingsland Woods, Sections 1 and 2, Dale District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Ceftin, it is resolved that Sir Sagamore Drive, Exoaliber Place, Sir Sagamore Court~ Sir binnadan Court, Sir Lionel Place and Sir Lionel Cou~t in Kingsland Woods, sections 1 and 2, Dale District, be and bhe~ hereby ar~ established public roads. And b~ it furthe~ resolved, %hat the Virginia Department of Transportation~ be and it hereby i~ r~quested tc take into the Secondary System, Sir Sagamore Drive, beginninq at the intersection ~ith Salem Church Road, Stat~ Route 642, and going southeasterly 0.06 mile to the intersection with Excalibur Place, then con%inulng s~utheasterty 0.Q7 mite :c ~he intersection with Sir Sagamore Conrt, then continuing southeasterly 0.06 ~ile to the intersection with Sir Dinnadan Court, tken sontinuinq southeasterly 0.06 mile to intersection with Sir Lionel Place, then continuing southeasterly 0.12 mile to end in a temporary turnaround; E~caliber Place~ beginning at the inter~e~t~on wi~h Sir ~agamore Drive and going northerly 0.13 mile to end in a temporary turnaround~ Sir Sagamore Court, beginning at intersection with sir Sagamore Drive and goinq northerly 0.10 mile to end in u cul-de-sac; Sir Dinnadan Court, beginning at the intersection with Sir Sagamore Drive and going northerly 0.09 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Sir ~ionel Place, begizning af She intersection with Sir Sagamore Drive and going northerly 0.85 mile to the intersection with Sir Lionel Court, then continuing northerly ~.3Q mile to tie into the intersection with King,land Road, Stat~ Route 611; and Sir Lionel Court~ beginning at the ~pterseotion with Sir Lionel Place and going This request is in~Iu~ive of tko adjacent slope, sight distance Section I. Plat Book 51, Page 99, January 8, 1986. This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with dir~etien~ from this Board, made rs~ort in writing upon his examination of Sir Scott Drive and Sir Scott Terrace in ~i4den Valley ~state~, Section ~, Bermuda District. 89-17 Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, it is resolved that Sir Scott Drive and Sir Scott Terrace in Hidden Valley ~states, Section 8, Bermuda District, be and they hereby ere established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Sir Scott Drive, beginning at the end of existing Sir Scott Drive, State Route 1671, and going eaeterly 0.05 mile to the intersection with Sir Scott Terrace; and Sir Scott Terrace, beginning at the intersection with Sir Scott Drive and going northerly 0.12 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. Again, Sir Scott Terrace, beginning at the intersection with Sir Scott Drive and going southwesterly 0.10 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage These roads serve 25 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-cf-way for Sir Scott Terrace and a 60' right-of-way for Sir Scott Drive. This section of Hidden Valley ~states is recorded as follows: Section 8. Plat Book 57, Page 30, June 9, 1987. Vote: UnanimOus This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon hie examination of Vickilee Court in Meatheridge, Section 4, Clover Mill District. UpQn consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr, Currin, it is resolved that Vickilee Court in Eeatheridg~, S~ction 4, Clover Hill District, be and it hereby is established as a public road. And be it' further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Vickilee Court, beginning at the intersection with North Vickilee Road, State Route 5276, and going southwesterly 0.04 mile, then turning and going southerly 0.lO mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slop~, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage These roads serve 17 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for this road. This section of Beatheridge is recorded as follows: Section 4. Plat Book 50, Page 67, September 4, 1985. Vote: Unanimous This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Barkbridge Road, Ball Cypress Road, Valencia 89-18 Road, Logswood Road and Tulip Oak Road in Pennwood, section and a porbien of Pennwood, Section 1, clever Hill District. Upon consideration whsreof, and on motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, it is resolved that ~arkbr±dga Road, Ball Cypress Road, Valencia Ro&d~ Legswood Road and Tulip Oak Road in Pennwood, Section 6, and a portion of ~ennwood, Section 1, Clover Sill Dietrich, be and they hereby are established as public roads, And be it further res01vsd, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and i% hereby is requssted to bake into Secondary System, Bark~ridgs Road, beginning at existing Barkbrid~ Road, Stat~ Route 2159, and going westerly 0.11 mile to the lute:section with Ball Cypres~ Road, then continuinq westerly 0.09 mile, th~n turning and going southwesterly 0.05 mil~ to the intersection with Valencia Road, then continninq SOUthwesterly 0.06 mile to the inter~ct~On wi~h ~ogsweed Road, then continuing southwesterly 0.03 mile to end at proposed Barkbridge Road~ ~ennwood, Section 7~ Ball Cypress Road, beginning a% tbs intersection with Barkbridg~ Read and going northwesterly 0.09 mile, then turning and gong southwesterly 0.0~ mile to en~ in a cul-de-sac; Valencia Road, beginning at %he intersection with Barkbridge Road and going northwesterly 0.~0 mile, then turning and ~oing southwesterly 0.]1 milo tO th~ intersection with Tulip Oak Road, then goin~ w~stcrly 0.03 ~ila to sn~ at exi~tin~ Valencia Reed, State Route Logswood Rea~, b~ginning ab the intersection with Barkbridqe Road and goin~ northwesterly 0.06 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Tulip Oak Road, beginning at the interssctlon with Valencia Road and ~oing southerly 0.03 mile to end at proposed Tulip Oak Road, PeDnwood, Section 7. This request is inclusive of the adjaeen~ slope, sight distance an~ designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainags easements. And b~ it further resolved, that the Board of guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transpo~tatlon right-of-way for all of these roa~s e~ept BarkbridgeRoad and Valencia Road which have a 60' right-of-way. Thsce ~ections cf Pennwood are recorded a~ Section 6. Plat Book 55 Pages 71~ 72 & 73, DecaYer 22, 1985. Section 1. Plat Book 26 Pa~ 97 & 9~, JBly 29, 1~76. Vohe~ Unanimous This day the County ~nvzronmental Engineer, in accordance with direction~ fro~ this Board, ma~e repor~ in writing upon his examination of Ridgerun Road, Timberun Road and Timbe~un Court . Upon conslde~atlon whereof, and on motion of Mr, Sullivan, seven,sd ~y Mr, Currin, it ie r~solved that Ridgerun Roa~, · imbe~n Road and Timb~run Court in G~eat Oaks, Section ~a~oaca District, be and they hereby are established as pu~li~ roads. And b~ it further re~olYed, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take info the ~eeond~ry System, Ridg~run Road, ~eglnning at existing Ridg~run Road, State Route 3091, and going wssterly 0.13 mile to the interaectien with Timbarun Road, then continuing w%sterly 0.03 ~ile to end at Ridgerun Road in ~reat Oaks, Section 7, State Route number to be assigned; Timbsrun Road, beginning ak e×iztinq Timberun Road, State Route ~094, and going westerly 89-19 0.04 mile to the intersection with Timberun Court, then going southwesterly 0.08 mile, then turning and going southerly 0.06 mile to the intersection with Ridgerun Road, then continuing southerly 0.04 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Timberun Court, beginning at the intersection with Timberun Road and going southerly 0.04 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This rsqumst is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage These roads serve 44 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of these roads. This section of Great Oaks is recorded as follows: Section 6. Plat Book 48, Page 66, February 15, 1985. VOte: Unanimous This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with. directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Ridgerun Road in Great Oaks, Section 7, Matoaca District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, it is resolved that Ridgerun Road in Great Oaks, Section 7, Matoaca District, be and it hereby is established as a public road. And be it further resolved, that the virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Ridgerun Road, beginning at the end of Ridgerun Road~ Great Oaks Section 6, State Route number to be assigned, and going westerly 0.07 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated virginia Department of Transportation drainage easements. This road serves 13 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-cf-way for this read. This section of Great Oaks is recorded as follows: Section 7. Plat Book 5B, Page 53, September 24, 1987. Thi~ day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of summit Acres Drive in Summit Acres, Midlothian District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, it is resolved that Summit Acres Drive in Summit Acres, Midlothian District, be and it hereby is established as a public road. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, summit Acres Drive, beginning at the intersection with Buford Road, State Route 678, and going southwesterly 0.20 mile to end in a temporary turnaround. 89-20 This request is inclusive of the adjaoen~ elope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage easements. This road eerves 18 lore. And be it further resolved, that th~ BOard of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50~ right-of-way for thi~ ~oad~ Summit Acre~ i~ recorded as follows: Plat Book 48, Page 76, February 28, 198S. REQUESTS FOR BINGO/RAFFLE PERMITS On motion o~ Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr_ Cvzrin, the Board approved requests for bingo/raffle permite, as indicated, for the following organlzation~ for the calendar year t9S9: ~RGANIZATION Virginia Deer Eunteze A~sociation, Inc. Virginia ~elles Softball Club Ridlothian High School Band Boosters The Jerusalem Connection TY~ Raffle Bingo Raffle singe/Raffle 15.D. APPOINTmEnTS 15.D.I, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY MUSEUM COF~IITTEE On motion of Mr. Muyus, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the B~ard nominated Dr. George Partin to serve on the Chesterfield County ~useum Cormmittee, whose formal ~ppointment will be made on January 25, 19S9. t5.D.2_ METROPOLITAN ECON0~IC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OPERATING COMMITTEE on motion of Mr. ~ulllvan, seconded by Mr. Mayer, th~ Boa~d nominated Mr. E, C. Autry to serve on the Operating Committee o~ the ~etrepol£tan ~conomie Development Cn~neiI, whose formal appointment will be made on January 25, I9~9. Vote: Unanimous 15.D.$. CHESTERFIBLD COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD 0~ ~OtiO~ of Mr. Applegete! SecOnded by Mr. Sullivan, the Boar~ nominated Me. Brenda Johneon to s~r~e on the Chesterfield Co--unity Services Board representing the Clover ~ill Di~trict~ whoee formal appointment will be made on January 25, 1989. Vote: Uaanlmous 15.D.~. AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD On motion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by Nr. Currin, the Board nominated the following persons~ representing the District as 89-21 indicated, to serve on the Airport Advisory Board, whose formal appointment will be made on January 25, 1989: Mr. John Mazza Mr. Melvin Shaffer Mr. Roger Burns Dr. Walter Kilbourne Mr. Philip Evans Vote: Unanimous Matoaca District Dale District Clover Hill District Bermuda District Midlothian District 15.E. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS 15.E.1. REQUEST TO CLOS~ SIR DINNADAN DRIVE There was discussion regarding the ~ingsland Woods residents' petitions requestinq Sir Dinnadan Drive be closed due to their concerns about the increased traffic in their neighborhood created by Sir Dinnadan Drive; the fact that Sir Dinnadan Drive has not been accepted into the State Secondary System; the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the County take no action toward requeeting Sir Dinnadan be taken into the State System until the issue o~ closing and/or keeping open the road has been resolved; staff's recommendation that the road not be closed primarily because of the small amount of traffic that it carries and is the second access to Ashton Woods SubdivisiOn both for convenience and emergency vehicles; and that if Sir Dinnadan were to be closed there would be property that would be landlocked, unavailable for State maintenance, etc. Mr. William Comer, President of Kingsland Woods Eomeowners Association, voiced support for the closure of Sir Dinnadan Drive, submitted a map to the Board for their perusal, and stated area residents desire to close this road as it has generated more traffic through their neighborhood, is a safety hazard to their children, has resulted in the necessity for moving neighborhood childrens' bus stop location and that if developers designed sufficient accesses to their projects it would not be nece~aary to rely on stub road connections to other subdivisions to alleviate traffic problems. Mr. Daniel inquired if this matter had been discussed with the residents of Lot 24, and if not, should be prior to any action being taken. He ~tated he preferred to defer the matter until Mr. McCracken and Mr. Comer draft a proposal and meet with the owners of Lot 24 to de~ermine whet-her or not they would be in agreement relative to the elo~ura of Sir Dinnadan Drive as they are the ones most a~fected by the request. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board deferred consideration of the request to close Sir Dinnadan Drive ~ntil February ~, 1989. Vote: Unanimous 15.E.2+ STI~EET LIGHT INSTALLATION COST APPROVAL On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board approved the street light installation coat approval at the intersection of Ellesmere Road and Robious Road, with funds in the amount of $2,694 to ~e expended from the Midlothian District Street Light Fund. Vote: Unanimous 15.E.3. STR~BT LIGBT BEQUESTS Onmotion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currln, the Board 89-22 approved ~ke installation of street lights a% t~e intersection cf Academy Drive and Courtkons~ Road, with funds to be exp~nd~d from the Clover Mill District Street Light Fund~ and the intsrsactionb of Creasman Drive and Sara Kay Drive and Iron Bridge Road and Ircngate Drive, with funds to be expended from the Dale District Street Light Fund. 15.E.4. ~ESOLUTION CONFIRMING PROCEEDINGS OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT A~TEORIT~ FOR ISSUANCE OF REFUNDING ~EVENUE On motion of Mr. Carrie, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board adopted the following re~oluti©n: W~BRE~, the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Chemteffield (the Autho=ity} has conmid~red the ~equest of Ncland Company (the Company) for ~he issuance of the Authorlty'm indamtrial development refunding revenu~ bon~$ iD an amount net to exceed $7,019,00Q {the Refunding Bonds) to refund any or all prior bonds issued by the Authority, the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Princ~ William and the Industrial D~velopment Authority of the City of Chesapeake, Virginia for %he benefit of the Company for the acquisition, construction, installation and ~c/ulpping of certain facilities for the Company in Chesterfield and Prince William Counties, Virginia end the City of Chesapeake, Virginia, reapactlvely (the Project), sad ham held a public hearing thereon on January 10, 1989; WHEREAS, the Authority has requested the Soard of Supervisors (the Be~rd) cf Chesterfield County~ Virginia, to approve the issuance of the Refunding Bonds to comply with Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ~th¢ Code) and Section 15.1-I378.t of th~ Co~e of Virginia, 1959, ss amended (the Virginia Code); and W~ER~$, the Authority has recommended that the Board approve the issuance of the Refunding Bonds; and WHeReAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Re~undlng Bonds, subject to terms to be agreed upon, a record Of the pablic hearing and a "fiscal impace statement" with respect to the Project have been filed with th~ Board. BE IT R~$0LVED BY THE BOARD OF ~UPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY~ VIRGINIA: I. The Board hereby approves the issuance of the Re~unding Bonds by the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield for the benefit of Neland Company, to the extent required by Section 147(f) of the Cede and Section 15.1-1378.] of the Virginia Code, to permit the Authe:i=y a$$1zt in the refinancing e~ the Project. 2. ApDEoval OS the issuance o~ the Refunding Bonds, as required by S~ction 147(f) of the Code and Sestien 15.t-1378.I e~ the Virginia Code, does net constitute an ~ndors~snt to a prospectiv~ purchaser of the Refunding or the cred~tworthlness of the Project or the Company, but, as required by Section 15.1-13S0 of the Virginia Code, the ~a~un~ing Bonds shell provide that n~ither th~ County ncr the Authority shall be obligated to pay the Refunding Bonds or the interest thereon or other costs incident thereto except from the revenues and moneys pledged therefor, and neither the ~aith or credit nor the taxing power of the Commcnweelth~ the County no~ th~ Authority shall be pledged thereto. 3. This upon its adoption. Vote: Unanimous resolution shall take effect immediately REQUEST TO REDUCE SPEED LIMIT ON IRON BRIDGE ROAD FROM WHITEPINE ROAD TO CANASTA DRIVE On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board adopted the following resolution: W~EREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County has received a request to reduce the Speed limit on Iron Bridge Road ~Route 10) from Whitepine Road (Route 701) to Canasta Drive (Route 742); and WHEgJ~A$, there have been approximately 186 accidents Over this section of Iron Bridge Road since 1955. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the ~oard requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to reduce the speed limit along that portion of Iron Bridge Road. Vote: Unanimous 15.E.6. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC REARING ON POSTING OF S~GNS ON TENTATIVE SUBDIVISIONS On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board set the date of February 8, 1989, at 7:00 p.m., for a public hearing to consider an ordinance amendment relating to the posting of signs on tentative subdivisions. Vote: Unanimous [5.E.7. PAY-~0R-GROWTB COMMITTEE REPORT There was discussion' regarding the purpose of the Pay-For-Growth Committee report; acceptance of the final report as submitted in accordance with the recommendations of the Committee, in order to sustain the support of the Home Builders Association of Richmond and others endorsing the report; otc. Mr. Currin and Mr. Sullivan stated they felt the Committee's recommendations were the best approach to the County's financial shortfalls and urged the Board to approve the proposed resolution which was submitted as an act of good faith to those individuals endorsing the Committee's recommendations. Mr. Currin made a motion, seconded by Mr. Sullivan~ to adopt the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, in recognition of the need to adequately plan and budget for the future growth and development of the County, appointed a Committee to review potential future capital needs and alteznatlve$ that may be available for financing future growth with particular emphasis on impact fees; and WMEREA$, the Committee, in studying future growth needs of the County, did determine that future residential growth would exact a cost for public services that could not be met by the present public revenue structure and rates; and WHEREAS, the Committee, in reviewing alternative additional means for financing the revenue shortfall of residential growth, recommended a "package" of revenue services that would derive funding from all segments of the community benefiting from growth; the recommended package includes: 89-24 o Transportation Districts Supervisors hereby accepts the final report of the individuals serving on this C0m~ui%tee; and B~ ~? ~URIM~R ~$OLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does endorse the package as reconu~end~d by the Committee; and Mr. Applegate stated ~Ae Committee derived much beneficial data from the study but he felt that the charg~ to the ¢oK~i~ee may and he should hays possibly restricted ~he r~pert to only members, and other individual$~ r~g~rdiag the reco~u~]e~datlons i~ original form wa~ unsuitable ~o him. Mr. Meyes ~tated he potential to increase property taxes, without public input wa~ the matter should be tabled until determinations could be made the necessary funding to mee~ service demands an~ that when appropriate to conduct a public hearing to hear =itlzen input regarding how they desire capital monies be se% aside to pay Mr. Danlel made a substitute motion, seconded by Mr, Ceftin, to Growth Committee Report untll March 8, 1989 when results Of th= Mr. Sullivan stated he wished the r~eord to reflect, with Watkin$ was a member of the Pay-For-Growth Co~ittee and h~ 15.E.8. ~SOLgTION REGARDING ROUTE 28S Mr. Applegate disclosed to the Board %hat he was involved with a eorp~r~tie~ that may hays been affected by the construction of Route 288 but i~ no longer and in order to be consistent with his previous voting record, declared a conflict of interest pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of ~ntezest Act and excused himself ~rom the meeting. On me=ion of Mr. Daniel, se¢on~e~ by M~. Mayes, the Boa~d adopted the fOlloWing resolution: WHEREAS, The Virginia Department of ~ighways and Transportation has decided in ~avor of a westerly route for Route 288 in Chesterfield County and although other loca~ governments have requested that their decision be r~viswed, it 89-25 does not take away the immediate need for this transportation corridor in our County today. NOW, TEEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors is requesting input and support of the Chesterfield Business Council to study, review, and recommend financial alternatives for constructing this much needed corridor from the terminus ef Pewhlte Parkway to Midlothian Turnpike with a targeted completion date of 1994. Ayes: Mr. Currin, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Applegate. Mr. Daniel requested that a copy of the resolution and a letter be forwarded to Mr. William Tennant, President of the Chesterfield Business Council, to be presented at the Business Council's Executive Committee meeting. Mr. Applegate returned to the meeting. Mr. Daniel excused himself from the meeting. 15.P. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ITEMS 15.F.1. AWARD OF ENGINEERING CONTRACT TO R. STUART ROYER AND ASSOCIATES FOR EXBANSlON AND u~GRADING OF TEE PROCTORS CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board awarded an engineering contract to R. Stuart Royer and Associates, Inc. for expansion and upgrading of the Proctors Creek Waetewater Treatment Plant, at a cost of $1,510,000 and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. (It is noted funding is provided in the FY89 Capital Improvement Budget.) Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Mayes and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. Mr, Daniel returned to the meeting. 15,F,3. CONSENT ITEMS 15.F.3.1. APPROVAL OF SEWER CONTRACT FOR RIVER'S BEND OFF-SITE SEWER LINE Mr. Cnrrin disclosed to the Board that he i~ co-owner of the subject property, declared a conflict of interest pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act and excused himself from the meetinq. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board approved the following sewer contract and authorized the County Administrator execute any necessary documents: S88-263CD, River's Bend Oi£-Site Sewer Line: Developer: Oliver D. Rudy, Trustee Contractor: Castle Equipment Corporation Total Contract Cost: $216,982.95 Total Estimated County COSt: $ 95,410.67 (Refund through connection fees) ~etimated Developer Cost: $121,572.28 Number of Connections: Future Code: 5N-2511-997 Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes and Mr. Sullivan. ADsent: Mr. Currin. Mr, Currin returned to the meeting. 89-26 15.F.3.a. SET DATE FO~ PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER SALE ACRE OF EURPSUS Pk0PERT~ ALONG WINTERPOCK ROAD On motion of Mr. Eullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board set the date Of February 8, 1989, at 7:00 p.m.~ for a public hearing to consider the sale of a parcel on Winterpo~k Road containing approximately One (1) acre as surplus property. Vote: Unanimous 15.F.3.b. CONVEYANCE OF EASEMENT TO VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY TO THE FIRE STATION ON AIRFIELD DRIVE On motion of ~r. Sulllvan~ seconded By Mr. Mayes~ the Board authorized the Chairman of the Hoard and the County Administrator to ex~cut~ an casement agreement with Virginia Electric and Power Company to in,tall buried cable for service to the fire station on A±rfle~d Drive. (A copy of the plat i~ ~iled with the paper~ of this Board.~ CLAIM UEED TO VACATE DPAINAGE EASEmeNT REQUESTED BY HAROLD T. GOYN~ On motion of Mr. Sullivan, s~oonded by Mr. Mayes, the Board authorized the chairman of the Board and the County AcI~inistrato~ to ~xecute a Quitclaim Deed by the ~arold Coyne ~state to vacate a 16' drainage ea~ement~ [A copy of plat is filed with the paper~ of thi~ Board.) Vote: Unanimous 15.F.~.d. DE~D OF D~DICATIDN ALONG U.S. ROUTE 1 FROM C~ST~RFIELD A~SOCIATRE On motion of Mr. Sullivan, ~ecOn~ed by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved and a~thorized the County Administrator to accept, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of a 25' strip of land along U.S. Routs 1 from Chesterfield Associates~ A Virginia Limited Partnership. {A Dopy of the plat is ~il~d with the papers of this Board.} Vote: URani~ou8 15.~.3,e. DEED OF DEDICATI0~ ALONG RUTNERS ROAD FROM FIRST VIRGINIA BANE-COLONIAL On motion of Mr. Sullivan, s~conOed by ~r. Mayes, the Eoard approved and au~horize~ ~hs County Administrator to aCCupt~ on Lehalf of the County, the conveyance of a 5' and variable width strip of lan~ slong Hatters Road from First Virginia Bank-Colonial~ A Virglnla Corporation. (A copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unenvious 15.F.3.f. D~B OF DEDICATION ALONG COURTNOUS~ ROAD FROM EXXON CORPORATION On ~o~io~ Of Mr. Sullivan~ 9ucOnded by Mr. Mayas, the Hoard approved and authorized the County Administrator to acoept~ on behalf of ~he County, the conveyance of a 4' and variable width strip of land along Courthouse Road from ~xxon Corporation, A New Jersey Corporation. (A copy of the plat is filed with %ho paper~ oi =his Board.) 89-27 15.F.3.9. QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR VACATION 0E WATER AND CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS REQUESTED BY MR. EDWARD L. SPAIN On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved and authorized the Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator to execute a Quitclaim Deed by Mr. Edward L. Spain to vacate a 9' water easement, a 5' temporary construction easement and portions of a 15' water easement. (A copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) IS.F.3.h. QUIT CLAIM DEED TO VACATE A DI~AINAGE EASEMENT REQUESTED BY RESTAURANTEUR INCORPORATED On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved and authorized the Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator to execute a Quitclaim Deed by Restauranteur Inoorporated to vacate a 16' drainage easement. (A copy of the plat is filed with the paper~ of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous 15.F,3.i. REQUEST TO AMEND CONTRACT FOR GENITO ESTATES TRUNK On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved a request from L. L. Caudle and E. J. Bell, to amend the county/developer contract for Genito Estates Trunk Sewer (Contract Number S86-139CD), dated September 18, 1986, and authorized the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents to include refunds from connection fees collected from other properties and which contract provides for refunds from the connection fees collected in the St. Regents Lake Subdivision and which appears, at thio time, not to allow the developers the opportunity to obtain the total amount of refunds that they are eligible to receive. Vote: Unanimous 15.~.3.i. REQUEST FOE A TIME EXTENSION OF REFUNDS ON COUNT¥/DEVELOgER PROJECT, BREvARD, SECTION 1 On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved the request from The Brevard Group for a time extension on the expiration date for Project W83-141CD, Hrevard, Section 1, On their eligibility for refunds for oversizing and offsite costs, provided the extension is for one (1) year, beginning December 14, 1988 and ending December 14, 1989, and with the understanding that no further time extensions will be granted. 15.F.3.k. APPROVAL OF SEWER CONTRACT FOR HAPPY HILL CENTRE O~-SITE SEWER LINE On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved the following sewe~ Contract and authorized the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents: S88-260CD, Mappy Hill C~nfre - Off-Site s~wer Line: Developer: Happy Hill Associates 89-28 Sub-Contractor: W. E. Duk~ and Son~, Total Con%tact Cos%: To%al Rs%imated County Cost: (Refund through connection fees) Estimated Developer Cost~ Number of Connections: Code: Vote: Unanimous Inc. $38,026.16 $ 3,74~.I8 $34,281.95 Pntur~ 5N-2~11-997 15.F.4. REPORTS Mr. Sale presented the Board with a report on th~ d~velopez water and sewer con~rae~s ~ecu~ad by the County A~mlnistrater. Mr. Ramsay presented thc Board with a status report on the General Fund Contingency Account, General Fund Balance, Road Reserve Funds, District Road and Strset Light Pun~$, Lease Purchases, School Beard Aqenda an~ the Board Public Rearing Sch%dule. ~r. Ramsay stated the Virginia Department of Yr~aspcrta~ion has formally notified the County of the accaptanc~ abandonment and/or renum~ering of th~ following roads into/from %he State Secondary System: ADDITIONS LENGT~ HUNTERS LANDING - SECTIONS 1~ 2 & 3 Route 4138 ~unters Landing Drive} - From Route 604 to 0.07 mile $o~th Route 4132 0.31 Mi. Route 4131 Poachers Run} - From Ronte 4130 to 0.04 mile northeast Rout~ 4133 0.21 Route 4t32 ~unt~r~ Land~ng Court) - From Route 4130 te southeast enl-de-~ee 0.06 ~i. Route 4133 Poachers Couffi) - From Route ~13I to northwest cul-de-sac 0.08 Route 4134 Boxwood Drive} - Prom Route 4131 to Route 4137 0.24 Route 4135 (Pursuit Court} - From Route ~1~ to southeast cu,-ds-sac 0.07 Route 4136 (Snare Court) - From Route 4134 to northwest cul-de-sac 0.07 NJ. to east cul-de-sac 0.10 Route 4208 {Ashlaks Parkway} - From Route 360 to 0.01 mile ~outh Rout~ ~201 Route 4201 (Broa~r~ach Drive) - From Route 4200 to 0.02 ~ile we~t Route ~20~ Route ~202 (Ashbrook Parkway) - From Route 4200 to 0.02 mile wast Route 4100 0.42 Mi. 0.02 Mi. 0.02 Mi. BEAVER POINT AT SOUTH RIDGE Route 3560 [~outh ~idpe Drive} - From 0.Q2 mile northeast Route 2113 to north cul-de-sac 89-29 0.22 ADDITIONS BRAVER POINT AT SOUTB RIDGE (continued} Route 3563 (Beaver Roint Drive) - Prom Routs 3560 to 0.04 mile west Route 3565 Route 3564 (Beaver ~ollew Court) - Prom Routs 3560 to west cul-de-sac Route 3565 (Beaver Falls Road) - Prom Route 3563 to north cul-de-sac Route 3566 (Beaver Falls Court) - From Route 3565 to southeast cul-de-sac STONECROP Route 3404 (Stoneorop Place) - From 0.04 mile we~t Route 3405 to west cul-de-sac AS~BROOE - SECTION 1 Route 4201 (Broadreach Drivs) - From 0.02 mile west Route 4200 to 0.13 mile south Route 4200 Route 4202 (Ashbrook Parkway) - Prom 0.02 mile west Route 4200 to 0.01 mile west Route 4203 Route 4203 (Offshore Drive) - From Route 4202 to 0.11 mile south Route 4206 Route 4204 (Helmsman Court) - From Route 4203 to northeast cul-de-sac Route 4205 (Inlet Court) - Prom Route 4203 to west cul-de-sac Route 4206 (Midship Woods Court) - From Route 4203 to southwest cul-de-sac CAMERON RUN - SECTIONS 3 ~ 4 Route 3284 (Sarrington Lane) - From Route 1552 to Route 3285 Route 3285 (New Pound Lane) - Prom 0.17 mile southwest Route 3284 to 0.04 mile northeast Route 3284 WALTON PARK - SECTION N Route 624 (Walton Park Road) - From 0,18 mile east Route 1096 to 0.04 mile east Route 4150 Route 1084 (Old Country Lane) - From 0.08 mile east Route 1095 to east cul-de-sac Route 4150 (Lancey Drive) - From Route 624 to north cul-de-sac Route 4151 (Laneey Court) - From Route 4150 to east cul-de-sac WALTON PARK - SECTION O Route 624 (Walton Park Road) - Prom 0.04 mile east Route 4150 to 0.04 mile southwest Route 4152 Route 4152 (Dawnridge Court) - From Route 624 to east cul-de-sac 89-30 LENGTH 0.16 Mi. 0.05 Mi. 0.22 Hi. 0.04 Mi. 0.04 si. 0.11 Mi. 0.08 Mi. 0.33 Mi. 0.06 Mi. 0.02 Mi, 0,07 Mi. 0.05 Mi. 0.21 Hi. 0.07 Mi. 0.11 Mi. 0,22 Mi. 0.15 Mi. 0.07 Mi. 0.18 Mi. ADDITIONS GLADSTO~ GLeN Route 3320 (Gladstone Glen Rl~c~) - From Route 720 to northwest ~ul-de-sac 0.14 DANHURST WOODS - SECTION 1 Route 3512 IDanhurst Drive) - From Route 1003 Route 677 - Seutions 2 and 3 of new location Rout~ 677; Project: 0147-0~0-101, RWZO6, C506 Route 822 - Section 4 of new eOnDectio~ Zoute 822; Project: 0147-020-101, RW206, C506 O. 12 ~41. o. 04 l~ii. Ro~te 677 - Section 1 of old location Route 677; Project: 0147-020-101, RW206, C506 0.10 ~i. ~RRING Route ~22 - ~e~tion 5 of old location koute Project= 0147-020-101, RW20~, C586 0.13 al. 16. ADJOURNMENT On motiun of Mr. S=11ivan, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board adjourned at 10:40 p.m. {EST) until January ~, 19~9 at 9:00 a.m. (EST). ~an~ B. Ramsey ~ County AdmiD~trator 89-31