Loading...
11-08-1989 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS MInUTeS NOVeMBeR 8, 1989 Supervisors in Attendance: Mr. G. H. Applegate, Chairman Mr. C. F. Currin, Jr., Vice Chairman Mr. Harry G. Daniel Mr. Jesse J. Mayes Mr. M. B. Sullivan Mr. Lane B. Ramsey County Administrator S~aff in Attendance: Ms. Amy Davi~, Exec. Asst. to Co. Admin. Mrs. Doris DeHart, Asst. Co. Admin., Legis. Svcs. and Intergovern. Affairs Ms. Joan Dolezal, Clerk to the Board Mr. Bradford S. Hammer~ Deputy Co. Admin., Management Services Ms. Alice Heffner, Youth Svcs. Coord. Mr. William H. Howell, Dir., Gen. Services Mr. Thomas E. Jacobson, Dir. of Planning Ms. Mary Lou Lyle, Dir. of Accounting Mr. Robert Masden, Deputy Co. Admin., Human Services Mr. R. J. McCraoken, Tran~p. Director Mr. Richard McElfieh, Dir. of Env, Eng. Mr. Steve Micas, Co. Attorney Mrs. Pauline Mitchell, Dir. of Hews/Info. Services Mr. Jay Stegmaier, Dir. of Budget Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr., Dir. of Parks & Rec. Mr. David Welchons, Dir. of Utilities Mr. Frederick Willis, Dir. of Human Resource Management Mr. Applegate called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. {EST) in the Administration Building Conference Room (Room 502). He stated the purpose of the work session was to provide the Board with info~mation on several issues, the first being the Swift Creek Water~hed Management Plan. 1. WORK 1.A. SWIFT CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN Mr. Welchons introduced M~. John P. Hartigan with Camp Dressar and McKee who discussed the methodology employed in developing the Management Plan for the Swift Creek Watershed and resulting recommendations. He presented a summary of the Plan outlining the watershed, subbasin and jurisdictional boundaries; objectives of the Watershed Management Plan; future land use alternatives for the Swift Creek Reservoir watershed; information regarding nonpoint pollution loading factor~ for total phoephorue and lead; pavement runoff contributions to 89-976 relative to land use controls, grass swales, detention hasi~s, runoff volume controls, artificial wetlands, etc. Discussion, questions and comments ensued relative te whether or not there are trunk sewer lines planned for Lake Ch~sdin and the Appomattox River areas; the purification leveI of all drinking water procs~ed through water treatment plant~ regardless Of its source; toxic indicators other than phosphorus and/or lead; how the e~isting road n%two~k impacts the existing w~ter quality in the County; the percentage of drinking wnter supplied from swift Cre~k R~$ervoir; whether th~ use of Swif~ Creek Reservoir as an operating facility would be functional or economically feasible in the f~ture; major a~/or minor cleanouts of the reservoir; etc. Nr. Hartigan stated the Plan is being developed to protect the reser~olr for a water supply as development continues in the waterghed an~ noted the benefice of the recommended Watershed area, which included the ~oal for nondsgradatlon of water quality; the use of and primary reliance on ~snstrustural controls relative to density restrictions~ impervious cov~r restrictions and the minimization Of cer0/~ereial and industrial development in the vicinity of th~ Swift Creek Reservoir; nonstructural control~; the maintenance of structural best Tequlatery requirements; and the financing approach implem~ntud ~hreugh an offsite pro-rata share program. Mr. Ram~ey ~ugge~ted, in conjunction with tho presentation of the Swift Creek Watershed Management Plan, that Mr. Jacobson present data relative to the Upper Swift Creek ~lan as the two plans are interrelated. 1.B. UPPER SWIFT CREE~ PLAN Mr. Jacobsen presented a sun~ary ef the Upper Swift Creek ~lan and outlined preliminary reco~m~sndations from the draft Plan which plan encompasses most of the Swift Creek Reservoir wa~e~she~ within the County as well es so~e areas outside the wa%ershed. ~s outlined the primary goals of ~he ~lan and recommendations by which said goal~ ~houtd be pursued. stated that to achieve efficient delivery cf public infra- structure in the study area phasing recomm~ndatlons have also been made: that of concentric growth in areas on the leading edge of suburban development; and tha~ of growth dispersed randomly throughout the entire study area. ~e no=ed the cost for public infrastructure i~ greater for di~pe~sed growth; therefore, th~ concentric growth sequence has been recommended. Discussion, quos%ions and comments ensued relative to the prsdiction~ under current conditions, for th~ buildoBt of the Swift Creek Reservoir area; cos= caloula%ions per dwelling for public services in the area; the purpose of the proposed Plan to provi~ a balance cf well-locate~ commercial, light industrial uses and residential uses noting that there ars lsrge tracts of land available in the area for economic develepmentl the lack uf certain infrastructures to support indust=ial development in certain arsa~; the depth of uses along major thoroughfares such as Route 360; identification of uses for the mixed use corridors; densities; funding avenues: the feasibility for potential industrial U$~s in the western portion of =he Connty~ the rationals for Camp Dresser and McKee's rmcommende~ 1.0 dwelling uni~s/psr acre for development as Compared to staff's recommended 1.8 dwelling nnits/per acre for r~sidential development; growth phasing philosophy if public water and sewer ars planned County-wide; why Lak~ Ch~sdin is belnq studied separately from the Upper Swift Creek region; whether or not the recommendation for a one 89-977 acre density plan would increase the life span/capacity of Swift Creek Reservoir; cost factors in the utilization of best management practices; the assumption that it is fundamental that any development in the Swift Creek Reservoir area be facilitated with public water and public sewer; the implementation of a Public Facilities Plan in conjunction with the Upper Swift Creek Plan; funding mechanisms for the Public Facilities Plan; etc. Mr. Jacobsen ~tated discussions on the Upper Swift Creek Plan are scheduled at a public meeting on November 15, 1989 at Clover Bill High School; at a Planning Commission work session on November 16, 1989; and for a Planning Conn~ission public hearing on November 21, I989 for recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. 1.C. RECYCLING AND ~O~ID WASTE ~%~AGEMENT ISSUES Due to time constraints, it was generally agreed that discussion on the recycling and solid waste management issues would be rescheduled on a future date. 2. E~-C[~TI%'E SESSION On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board went into Executive Session pursuant to Section 2.1-344(a) (3) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, to consider (1) the acquisition of real property for public use and (2) the disposition of publicly held property; and for consultation with legal counsel pursuant to Section 2.1-344(a) (7) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, regarding (3) the appeal of Dominion Real Estate Investors from its special assessment for the construction of sewerage facilities in the Route 1/301 Sewer Assessment District; and (4) probable litigation with the State Water Control Board; and (5) Wilton and Napier versus Board of Supervisors. Vote: Unanimous Reconvenlng: Mr. Applegat¢ stated Mr. Currin disclosed to the Board that his business partner has been involved in negotiations of real property for public purposes (Item 1) which the Board was to discuss in Executive Session, he declared a potential conflict of interest pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act and excused himself from the meeting before discussion of the matter. Pertaining to (1) the acquisition of real property for public use pursuant to Section 2.1-344(a) (3) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, a~ amended, it was on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, resolved that the Board adopt the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day adjourned into Executive Session in accordance with a formal vote of the Board, and in accordance with the provisions of the Uirginia Freedom of Znformation Act; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act effective July 1, 1989, provide~ for certification that such ~xecutive Session was conducted in conformity with law. NOW, ~H~EPORE, B~ IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Supervisors does hereby certify that to the best of each member's knowledge, i) only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements under the Freedom of 89-978 Information Act were discussed in ~he ~xecutive Session to which this certification applie~ and ii; only such public business matters as were identified in the Motion by which the considered Dy the Board. No member dissents from this certifi- cation. The Board being polled, the vo~e was as follows: Vote; Mr. Daniel Aye. ~r. Mayas Aye~ Mr. Sullivan Aye. Mr. Currin Abstain. Mr. AppI~gate Aye. Fer%eining to (2) the disposition of publicly held property; and for consultation with leq$l counsel pursuant tc Section 2.1~344{a) (?) of the Code ef Virginia, 19~0, as amended, regarding {B) the appeal of Dominion Real Estate Investors from its special assessment for the construction of sewerage facilities in the Ro~te 1/301 Sewer Assessment ~istriet; and (4) probable litigation with ~he State Water Control Board; and motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by tho Board adopt the following resolution: into Executive Seseion in accordance with a foxmal vote of the Board, and in aoeoxdance with the prouisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act: and W~EREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act effective July l, I989, provides for ~ertification that such Executive SeSsion was conducted in conformity with law. NOW, THEREFORe, B~ IT RESOLVED that the ~uard of County supervisors de~e hereby certify that to the b~st of each member's knowledge, i) only public business matters lawfully exempted ~rom open meeting requirements under the Freedom of Information Act were discussed in the Executive Session to which this certification applies, and ii) only such public business matters as were identified in the Motion by which the considered by the Board. No member dis~ente from this certifi- cation. The Board being polled, the vote was as follows: Vote: Mr. Daniel - Aye. ~r, ~ayes - Aye. Mr. Sullivan - Aye. Mr. Currin - Mr, Applegate - Aye. The Board receeeed at He,se for dinner. p.m. (EST) to travel to the Farm In the absence of a minister, Mr. Applegate gave the invoca- ~9-~79 5. PLEDGE OF ArJ.RGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF Mr. Lane Ramsey, County Administrator, led the Pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America. of 6. APPROVAL OF MINDT~$ On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Hoard approved the minutes of October 25, 1989, as amended. Vote: Unanimous 7. CO~NTYADMINIST~ATOR'S COMMENTS Mrs. Pauline Mitchei1 introduced Ms. Karen Jones, recently employed as an Information Specialist, and outlined her background. The Board welcomed M~. Jones to the County. Mr. Ramsey congratulated Mr. Steve Micas, County Attorney, and Battalion Chief Steve Elswick, Fire Alarm Headquarters, for their successful completion of the New York Marathon. 8. BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS Mr. Daniel reported he attended the Metropolitan Economic Development Council (MEDC) Board of Directors meeting, at which there was a video demonstration regarding the Richmond Metropolitan area designed for the Japanese and European markets; accompanied Mr. Currin to a meeting of small business representatives at which concerns were expressed regarding the treatment of small business in Chesterfield County and felt that it would be appropriate for the Board to discuss the merits of and direct the County Administrator to review the feasibility of placing a emall business coordinator on staff, whether in the Economic Develot~ment and/or Planning Departments, to assist small businesses through the maize of bureaucracy particularly in the area of economic development; and commended Chief Robert Eanes, Jr., his staff and the efforts of the Bensley and Date Fire Stations and Hazardous Waste Disposal Team for the professional, expeditious manner in which they handled a recent, potentially dangerous occurrence at his home. Mr. Mayes reported he participated in greeting and welcoming to the County the Association of National ~ducational Office Secretarial Personnel at the Holiday Inn-Koger Center. Mr. Sullivan reported he attended the induction of three members into the Senior Citizens Hall of Fame, two of whom were from the Midlothian District Ms. Carrie Rodgers and Mr. Leland B. Anderson; and chaired a meeting of the Water Resource Task Force, which group is proceeding on a plan for the determination of joint resources and utilization of ~ame for th~ Richmond Metropolitan area. Mr. Currin reported he accompanied Mr. Daniel to a meeting of small business representatives, felt that the meeting was very beneficial and hoped the Board would continue this practice in the future. 9. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE ACTION, ]~4ERGENCY ADDITIONS OR C~ANGES IN THE ORDER OF PRESENTATION There being no changes, it was on motion of Mr. Daniel, 89-980 seconded by Hr. Mayes, ~e$olved that the agenda be adopted as submitted. Vote: Unanimous 10. I~ESOLUT~0~S P~ND S~ECIAL ~ECOGNITIONS 1O.A. ~KOCLAIMING NOVEMBER 13-19, 19~ AS "CE~$TERFIELD COUNTY YOUTH WEEK" Mr. Masden introduced Ms. Lillian Duffey, Chairman of the Youth Services Commission, MS. Lee Deal, Optimist Club of River, and M~, ~ary Watson, Signet Bank, sponsors of Che~te~- field County Youth Week evente and the Youth Award$ Night program. On motion of the BOard, the following r~solution was adopted: in Chesterfield County; and community to promotm the well-being of yeunq people; and W~EREA~, The Youth Services ConTnis~ion actively ~ke th~ skills, ce~itment and knowledge of young people and adults in optimist Club of James River to stimulate constructive co~itment of Signet Bank to provide financial support for Youth Awards ~ight, an event which highlights the positive achievements of young people; and community through volunteer work, extracurricular activities and individual acts; end WHiP. AS, The Chesterfield community has a r~pon~ibillty County Board uf Supervisors proclaims November 13 - 19, 1989 "Chesterfield County Youth Week" during which activities recognizing the contributions of cuunty youth and educating public on issues affecting young p~ople will be held. County youth will b~ recognized and Lonered by th~ Youth servlo~s Commission and the Optimiet Club of J~m~es River for of the "Outstanding Youtk of Chesterfield County" Award. behalf of The youth of t~e County. ~9-981 10.E. RECOGNIZING NOVEMBER 12-18, 1989 AS "AMERICAN ~DUCATION WEEK" Mr. Jeffrey Cribbs, Chairman of the School Board, presented background information relative to "American Education Week" and introduced Dr. E. E. Davis, School Superintendent and Dr. John Cardea, Clover Mill School ~oard representative who were present. On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, "American Education Week"' is celebrated nationally from November 12th through November 18th; and WHEREAS, The Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors supports this national celebration of Liberty and Learning= Our Roots, Our Future; and WHEREAS, Public Education in Chesterfield County ie held in the highest esteem by citizens, business and industry and public officials; and W~R~AS, The purpose of the "American Education Week" is to increase public understanding and appreciation of the Nation's schools; and WHeReAS, The Board of Supervisors encourages parents and non-parents to visit schools; and WHEP~EAS, The Board wishes to continue to build civic and community support for education. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors does hereby declare that November 12 - 18, 1989 be celebrated as "American Education Week" in Chesterfield County. AND, BB IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this rasolution be permanently filed with the papers of this Soard of Supervisors. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Appleqate presented the executed resolution to Mr. Crihbs, Dr. Davis and Dr. Cardea and commended them for their tremendens efforts toward the continuation of and co~tmunity support for the education of the County's youth. Mr. Cribbs, Dr. Davis and Dr. Cardea presented the Board members with "Flag of Learning and Liberty" pins in recognition of the Board's support of "American Education Week". 10.C. MR. R. JAY CAWLEY, III, UPON ATTAINING RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, The Boy Scouts of ~nuerica was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and W~REAS, The Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote citisenehip training, personal development and fitness of individuals; and WHEREAS, After earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a treop, carrying out a eervice project beneficial to his community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit and living Up to the Scout Oath and Law; and W/4EREAS, Mr. R. Jay Cawley, III, Bethia United Methodist Church, Troop 822, has accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout 89-982 which is received by less than two percent of those individuals Entering the ~couting m~vem~nt; and WHEREAS, Growing through his experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship and priding himself on the great ao=umplishmsnts of hi~ County, Jay is indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom ws can all be vary proud. NOW, T~REFOR= BE IT R~QLV=D, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby extend~ its ¢on~ratulation~ to ~r. R. Jay Cawley, III and acknowledges the good ~ortune of the County to have such an outstanding young men as ons of it~ citizens. Mr. Ap~legate ~resented the exeouted resolution to Mr. Cawley, commended him £or his out~tandlng achievement and recognized members of his family who ware present. 10.D. MR. KEVIN S. REED, U~ON ATTAINZNG ~%NK OF F~AG~ SCOUT On motion o~ th~ Board, th~ following resolution wa~ adopted: WI~EREAS, The Boy Scouts of kmerica was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; end W~EREAS, The Boy Scouts of A~rica was founded to promote cltlsenship training, personal development and ~itness of ~ndividusls~ and W~EREAS, After earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in e troop, carrying out a ~ervice projee~ beneficial to his oom~unity~ being active in the troop, demonstrating S~out W~EREAS, M~. Ravin St~son Reed, Troop 897, has accomplished those high s~andards of ~o~i~enT and ha~ ~each~ the long-~onght goal of Eagle Scout which is reueived by less ~han two percent of those individuals entering the Scouting W~EREAS, Growing through his ~xperi~nces in Scou=inq, himself on the great ae~ompli$~%~n~s of his County, NOW~ T~F0~ B= IT R~S0L~D, ~hat the C~esterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby ~xtends its to Mr. Kevln Stlmson Reed and aoknowledges thc good fortune of cltizen~. Vote: Unanimou~ Nr. Appleqat~ presented the execu=e~ re~olution to Mr, Reed, co~ended him for hi~ outstanding achi~v~en% and recognized m~mber$ of his family and Scou= Troop 897 who were ~resunt. CENTENNIAL ANNIVERSARY OF S~ILO~ BAPTIST ¢~URCH On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: WHE~S, The Shiloh Baptist Church of Matoaca began in November, 1~89 with twenty-four members in the home of Mr. Andrew Thomas; and 89-983 WHEREAS, The congregation met for a number of years out-of-doors in a "brush arbor;" and WHeReAS, Its well-loved Pastor, M. R. Newsom, eerved twenty years and Oversaw the construction in 1908 of the first substantial church building; and W~ER~A~, The church (for one hundred years) has served its community in three different buildings and with eleven pastors; and WHEREAS, The church has drawn leadership over the years from Virginia State University and actively Supported the Baptist Children's Home in Matoaca; and WHEREAS, The congregation has grown to more than three hundred members and will celebrate one hundred years of ministry to the Matoaoa Co~unity on November 12, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE RE IT RESOLVED, that we recognize the contributions of Shiloh Baptist Church to its community, congratulate the congregation on its centennial and wish it well as it enters its second century of service to Chesterfield County. Mr. Applegate stated Mr. Mayes would be presenting the resolution at the centennial anniversary celebration at Shiloh Baptist Church on November 12, 1989. 11. HF2tRINGS OF CITIZENS ON UNSCHEDULED MATTERS OR CLAIMS There were no hearing of citizens on unscheduled matters or claims. DEFERRED ITEMS 12.A. APPROVAL OF COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT AMONG CHESTERFIELD, EOWTfATA~, AMELIA AND CUMBERLAND COUNTIES AND APPOMATTOX RIVER WATER AUTHORITY JURISDICTIONS FOR PLANNING OF LAKE GENITO WATER IMPOUNDMENT Mr. Micas stated that for several months Chesterfield, Powhatan, Amelia and Cumberland counties (PACC) have been attempting to develop the Lake Genito Water Impoundment. He stated in conjunction with that project, PACC has been preparing a cooperative agreement with the Appomattox River Water Authority to facilitate the development of that project; however, as a result of Chesterfield County's commitment to purchase water from the City of Richmond, staff feels that it is no longer necessary, at this time, to request that PACC amend the Lake Genito Cooperative Agreement or complete the agreement. Mr. Daniel suggested the approval of the Cooperative Agreement among Chesterfield, Powhatan, A~elia and Cumberland Counties (PACC) and the Appomattox River Water Authority jurisdictions for the planning of the Lake Genito Water Impoundment be deferred indefinitely and be brought back to the Board for consideration as the timing ~equires and that those involved in the project continue to meet to discues the merits of Lake Genito as the issues develop. Mr. Sullivan noted that the Lake Genito project remains part of the County's and its neighboring jurisdictions' future plans and that Chesterfield intends to continue to strive for the materialization of thc project. He stated, however, he felt that the proposed agreement, at this time, was premature but that deferral should not be misconstrued as tel~Aination of effo~ts toward the project. 89-984 m m On motion of Mr, Daniel, ~mconded by Mr. Sullivan, the BeaRd resolved to defer indefinitely approval of a coopmrative agreement among Chesterfield, Powhatan, Amelia and Cumberland Counties and the Appomattox River Water Authority jurisdictions for the planning of the Lake G~nite Water Impoundment he deferred indefinitely and to be brought hack to the Board for consideration as the timing requires and that those involved continue to meet to discuss the merits Of Lek% G~nite as the 12.B. STREET NAME CHANGE Mr. McElfiah noted that staff is working with area residents who will be affected by the proposed na~e change to detel~mine u mutually apreeable~ appropriate name for that portion of Happy Rill Road located from Branders Brid~e Road east to its proposed inter~ection with Happy Hill Road Relocat~. ke noted that the selected name will be brought hack to the Beard for approval at a futur~ date. O~ motion of ~r. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Currin~ the ~oard directed staff ~e proceed with the appropriate ~teps necessary for chanqinq the nam~ of Rappy Hill Road located from Branders Bridge Road eas~ to its proposed intersection wiuh Happy Hill Road Relocated. Vote: Unanimous l$.A. AN A~ENDMENT TO THE NORTHERN AREA LAND USE AND TRANSPOR- TATIO~ PLAN, AN ELEMENT OF THE 9LkN F©~ CH=STRRFIELD, AS ~24ENDED, W~!C~ SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSES ~E COURTHOUSE ROAD CORRIDOR AR~A OF CHESTE~IELD COUNT~ Mr. Jacobsen stated this data an~ ~ime had been advertimed for a public hearing to consider an amendment to the ~orthern Area Land Use and Tranm~ortatiOn Plan, an element cf the Plan for Chesterfield, as amended, ~hf~ specifically addressee the Ceu~thouee Road Corridor area of =he County. He presented a summary of the proposed Courthouse Road Corrld©I Plan~ explained that the study area encompassed a small por~f6~ of Chesterfield COunty covering approximately 3,000 a~zes of land from Dranchway Road on the north near the intersectioR of Midlothisn Turnpike and Courthouse Road to the Rockweed Offic~ Complex, located north of the Courthouse Road intersection with Hull Street Road; noted that the study aiwa boundaries were determined by a relatively uniform ~evelopment pa~tern and th~ role of Courthouse Road as a primary access faoiligy for neighborhoods aaa undevelope~ land within the Study area; stated that staff review various alternatives for addressing the cenuneruial market potential of the ~errldor and determined the impacts of additional commarolal development en the land use pa%tern, transportation network and public facilities in an ~ffort to preserve the residential quality e~ the ar~a. He presented land use development alternatives and evaluations of those alternatives, explained prop¢$ed uses utilizing a map Of ~he subject area and indicated Alternative 3, neighborhood comm~rclal and residential development, appeare~ to be the more viable plan o~ development for thi~ corridor. Re further noted there had been a number of meetings held to address citizens. concerns as well as diecussiuns through the publ±e hearing process. He stated the Planning Commission ~eccmmended that the current Northern Area Land Ute and Tran~p©rtatlon Plan remain in e£~ect until road improvements' to Courthouse Road and Lucks Lane have bean completed and that following completion of said road improvements, consideration will be given to the 89-98~ amendment of the Northern Area Land USe and Transportation Plan. Mr. Oliver Rudy, representing ar~a residents comprising the Courthouse Road Landowners Association whose properties front Courthouse Road, presented a videotape of approximately 17 landowners expressing concerns and demonstrating the effect of traffic along Courthouse Road on their environment and property. He stated these residents feel the recommended Plan is not in their best interest, =hat growth in the area has depreciated citizens' property values for residential uses, that they want their property values competitive with other area properties for future commercial use; stated the affected residents have been plac~d in an untenable position by the acquiescence of the Board permitting such development in this corridor; and requested that the Board take equitable and justifiable ac=ion to provide relief to and protect these property owners' fundamental p~operty rights. When asked, approximately 50 persons stood to indicate their support fur commercialization along Courthouse Road. Ms. ~ajcrie Livesay, Mr. Richard Ncrnberger, Mr. John Wesley Gray, Jr., all landowners along Courthouse Road, and Mr. Butch Brame, Pr~sident of the Courthouse Road Landowners Association and a resident along Courthouse Road, voiced concerns relative to depreciated property values, competitive market values for their property with other area properties for future commercial uses, noise/air pollution, traffic congestion, reduced driveway accesses, safety hazards, etc.; indicated they felt the Waverly Report contained misinformation; and requested the Board take action at this time to provide an equitable re~olution to their plight. Petitions were submitted to the Board in support of commercialization of the corridor. Mr. Dave Miller, President of Courthouse Road Residential Today and Tomorrow (CR~STT) and President of Nylton Park Civic A~sociation; Me. Marian Bonney, Wedgewood Subdivision; Mr. Russell Gulley, Smoketree Subdivision; Mr. Carroll Youngkin, Stonehenge Subdivision; Mr. Hoyt Spradlin, Lake Crystal Subdivision; Ms. Janney Priddy, Chestnut Hills Subdivision~ and Mr. T. L. Jenkins, Courthouse Road resident/homeowner, voiced support for the Planning Commission recommendation; e~pressed concerns relative to increased traffic flow that would be generated by further commercial development along Courthouse Road; indicated acceptance of the commercial market analysis prepared by the Waverly Research Group; stated commercial, business and retail zonings in the study area were neither needed or desired; and urged the Board to sustain the Planning Commission's unanimous approval for fh~ continuance of the current Northern Area Land Use and Transportation Plan. Petitions were submitted to the Board ~n opposition to the further commercialization of the Courthouse Road Corridor. There being no further public comment, the public hearing wag closed. Mr. Daniel stated he understood how both faction~ felt regarding the development of the Courthouse Road Corridor; that the aspect~ brought out in the discussion'had merit but made a decision at this time more difficult; that approval of the proposed plan in its present posture could set a precedent for other areas of the County to request the same type of changes~ and that he felt the matter should be deferred until such time as Courthouse Road is designed for widening so that a determination can be made as to how such widening will impact area residents and at that time re-review the proposed Plan for a decision. Mr. Mayes stated he felt the presentations had been enlightening and well-prepared; however, he was not in an appropriate position at this time to support either side. 89-986 Mr. Sullivan expressed concerns relative to the design/con- ~tr~ctlon sshedule for the ~ideninq of Courthouse Road; the impact of condemnation by the Stats on the value of affected houses; stated he was net in a position at thf~ time to make a decision oB this matter; and suggested that a decision be pootponed until such time aa construction of ro~d improvements is completed and there is some evidence as to what the impact of widening Courthouse Road may have on a~ea ~esident$. ~r. Currin expressed concerns regarding th~ ntnmber of lan~s of pavement anticipated for construction when Courthouse Road i~ widened; if the issue of crosaover~ had been addresse~; the number of homes tha~ would be condemned~ noise barriers! and stated he felt the Board should address %he prohl~ new as opposed to having to waft five ~o ~en years for a solution. Mr. Daniel noted that whatever Board action were to tran~pfr~ it would not preclude residents who wish ~o rezone their property to co~tmercial n~ f~om submitting applications to do so and bring their request forward ~o the Board for consideration. Mr. Applegate stated he felt the situation was a difficult that he did not want to ass deterioration of %he corrider~ that he had attempted ~o ~ake all aspects of the mat~er into considera=ion and not bns~ his decision On one factor; and that he felt the current plan should remain in effect until SUch time as the design, public h~arlng process and funding m~ckani~ms w~r~ in placs. Mr, Applegate moved, s~conded by Mr. Sullivan, to deny an amendment to the surren~ Northern Area Lend Use and Transportation Plan, an element of the ~lan for chesterSield, as a~endad, Which specifically addresses the Courthouse Road Corridor area of the County, until such time ~s the design process for the widening of Conrfhouse Road is completed, appropriate publfe h~arings have been coadu:t~d to ena~re that the widening of Courthouse Road will occur and to as~ur~ that appropriate funding for completion of ~aid project is available. Thane was farther dieousslon relative to the impact of residents who presently live along Courthouse Road if a change in the ~lan were not appxoved at this tlme~ the marketing of property through th~ resorting process; ~tC~ Mr. Applega=~ restated his motion, ~ec0nded by Mr. Sullivan, tc deny an amendment to the current Northern Area Land Use and Transportation Pla~, an element of The Plan for Chesterfield., es amended, ~hich specifically addresses the Courth0~se ~oad the widening of Courthouse Road will occur and to assure that appropriate funding for completion of said project is available. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin~ Mr. Daniel and Mr. Sullfvan. Abstention: Mr. Mayas. was generally agreed to rec%~ for five minutes. g9-987 Reconvening: 13.B. AN ORDINANCE TO A~=ND SECTION 14.1-1 OF TEE CODE OF TEE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,. VIRGINIA, 1978, AS AMENDED RELAT- ING TO ADOPTION OF STATE LAW CONCERNING MOTOR VEHICLE OFFENSES Mr. Micas stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an amendment to the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, relating to the adoption of State law concerning motor vehicle offenses. He noted the Board adopted ~he proposed ordinance on an emergency basis at its October 11, 1989 meeting. No one camo forward to speak in favor of or against the proposed ordinance. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board adopted the foltowinq ordinance on a permanent basis: AN O~DINANC~ TO AMEND SECTION 14.1-1 OF THE CODE O~ THE COUI~TY OF CHeSTERFIelD. VIRGINIA. 1978, AS AMeNDeD, R~LATING TO ~%DO~TION OF STATE ~AW CONC~NING I~OTOR ~HICL~ OFF,SEe BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia: (1) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended by amendinq the following section; Section 14.1-1 Adoption of state law. Pursuant to the authority of section 46.2-1313 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, all of the provisions and requirements of the laws cf the state contained in Title 46.2 and Article 2 of Chapter 7 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia, as in force on October 1I, 1989 except those provisions and requirements the violation of which constitutos a felony, and except those provisions and requirements which by their very nature can have no application to or within the county, are horeby adopted and incorporated in this chapter by reference and made applicable within the county. References to "highways of the state" contained in such provisions and requirements hereby adopted shall be deemed to refer to the streets, highways and other public ways within the county. Such provisions and requirements are hereby adopted, mutatis mutandis, and made a part of this chapter as fully as though set forth at length herein, and it shall be unlawful for any person, within the county, to violate or fail, neglect or refuse to comply with any provision of Title 46.2 or Article 2 of Chapter 7 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia which is adopted by thie section; provided, that in no event shall the penalty imposed for the violation of any provision or requirement hereby adopted exceed the penalty imposed for a similar offense under Title 46.2 or Article 2 of Chapter 7 of Title 18.2 oi the Code o£ Virginia. Vote: Unanimous 14. NEW BUSINE$S 14.A. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FROM GENERAL FUND FOR PURCHASE OF FIVE SEMI-AUTOMATIC DEFIBRILLATORS There was brief discussion relative to the difference between an automatic and e semi-automatic defibrillators; the number currently in use and the purpose for which such equipment is used; the level of certification which permits an individual to utilize such equipment; whether or not there are future plans 89-988 for upgrading the technical expertise of existing staff to use $~tomatic defibrillators; the locution of automatic defibrilla- tors on rescue squad units only; On morion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board appropriated $35,000 from the General Fund to the Fire ~epart~ent'Emer~enoy Medical Service~ Center for the purchase of five semi-automatic defibrillators to be placed at Company 8, Matoaca; Company 12, Ettrick; Company 14, Dutch Gap; Company 15, Airport~ and a Training spare. (It is noted the total cost to purchase five semi-automatic defibrillator~ i~ $36,700, with the General Fund Balance being identified as the source of funding for the $35~000 due to the addition to the General Fund Balance fro~ th~ sale of land and the additional $1,78D being absorbed within the Fire Department's FYP0 budget. It is further ~oted there i~ no long t~rm effect on the General Fund Balance because this appropriation had been identified as r~quir~d in FY~l but will not have if purchaeed thi~ year.) Vote~ Unenir~on~ 14.~. APPROVAL OF 1990 L~Gi~LATIVE PROGRAM After a brief discussion, it was on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currin, reeolved that the Board adopt the proposed draft 1990 Legislative Program, as amended, for discussion with the County's Le~i~lativ~ De%egation for possible adoption by ~he General Assembly, a copy of which ~rogram is filed with the papers of this Board. Vote: Unanimous Mrs. DeHart noted that staff will be scheduling a seating in tho near future with the Legislative Delegation to discuss the proposed program. 14.C. ADOPTION QF PJ~SOLUTION OPPOSING A PROPOSED REDUCTION IN FREE DIRECTORY ASSI~TANC~ TELBPHQN~ CALLS On motion of ~r. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board adopted the following resolution= W~EREAS, The Virginia Telephone Association ("VTA"} has filed an application in the State Corporation Commission {the "Gommiseion") ~ Case NC. PUC890025, ~eeking a reduction in the monthly free call allowance for directory assistance from the current level of eight per month to two p~r month for residential uus%omer~ and to zero for business c~tomers: and Wa~kEAS, Telephone directerlss sre often out of dote, cover only a limited service area and ere difficult for many, including =he elderly and visually impaired, to use; and W~EA~, VTA~s prc~osal, if approved, would increase the cost of basic telephone service for both ~esid~ntlal and business customers in Ghester£ield County and throughout the NOW, T~FORE, BE IT RESOLVED by ~he ~oard of Supervisors o~ Chesterfield County that the COunty of Chesterfield opposed to any r~du¢tiOn in the monthly free call allowance for d~rectory assistance c~rren%I~ provided as a part telephone service. BE IT FURTHER ~SOLV~D ~at the Count~ Attorney is authorized and directed to transmit a copy of this to the Co~i~sion and to take ~u0h further action as may be neceesary and ~prudent to oppose VTA's application currently pending in the Co~issio~ as Case No. PUC890Q25. 89~989 Vote; Unanimous 14.D. RESOLUTION URGING GOV~RNOR AND GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO GIVE SPECIAL ATTENTION T0 NEEDS OF THE MENTALLY DISABLED IN THE 1990-92 BIENNIA5 BUDGET On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Eoard adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, The Chesterfield Board of Supervisors is greatly concerned about citizens in need of m~ntal health, mental r~tardation and substance abuse services; and WHEREAS, Over 200 citizens ars currently on waiting lists for the programs of the Chesterfield Community Services Board, many of these persons having waited several years; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County provides a significant portion of the funding of the Chesterfield Coramunity Servioe~ Board through local taxes; and WHeReAS, Local government cannot be expected to provide the majority of funding for services which have historically and traditionally been the responsibility of ~tate government; and WHEREAS, The lack of adequate treatment resources is not unique to Chesterfield but pervasive throughout the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, A coalition of oonoums~s, parents and advocacy groups for mentally disabled'persons are endeavoring to obtain a major commitment of new State funds in the 1990-1992 Biennium to address the~e needs. NOW, T~EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors joins with the citlzsns of our community in Urging the Governor and the General Assembly to consider funding of services for the mentally disabled among the top priorities for the 1990-1992 Biennium including full funding for existing State initiatives. 14.E. CONSENT ITEMS 14.E.1. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Cinderwood Drive, Mason Run Driver East Run Court, Mason Valley Drive and Mason Valley Court in Mason Woods, Section C, Dale District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currin, it is resolved that Cinderwood Drive, Mason Run Drive, East Run Court, Mason Valley Drive and Mason Valley Court in ~ason Woods, Section C, Dale District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Cinderwood Drive, beginning at the intersec- tion with Beulah Road, State Route 641, and going northerly 0.03 mile to the intersection with Mason Valley Drive, then turning and going northwesterly 0.04 mile to the intersection with Mason Run Drive, then continuing northwesterly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Mason Run Drive, beginning at the intersection with Cinderweod Drive and going southwesterly 0.07 89-990 mile to the interseotio~ with East Run Court, then continuing southwesterly 0.03 mile to tie into e×is~ing Mason Run Drive, State Route 4021; East Run Court, beginning at the intersection in a cul-de-sac; Mason Valley Drive, b~ginning at the inter- ~ction with Cindorwoo~ Drive and going northeasterly 0.03 mile, then turninq and qoing northerly 0.07 mile, then turning and going northwesterly 0.02 mile to the intersection with Mason Valley Courtw then continuing northwesterly 8.03 mile, than turning and going westerIy 0.07 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Mason Valley Court, beginning at th~ interSec- tion with Mason Valley Drive and going northeasterly 0.03 mils to end in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distanc~ and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage The~e roads serve 70 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia ~epart~nent Of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of these roads. This section of Mason Woods is recorded as follows: Section C. Plat Book 53, Page 62, July 16, 1986. Vote: Unanimou~ Mr. Applegate stated that one of his associates had been involved in the construction of Otterburn Road and requested clarification as to whether 0r not he had a potential conflict of interest relative to the e~tablishment of that ro~d as a public road. Mr+ Micas stated, in his opinion, there wa~ ne way in which anyone could hav~ a financial interest in the acceptance ef ~ ~tate road and, therefore, he did not believe a conflict of interest existed. This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with ~ir~ctions from this Board~ made report in ~riting u~on his exaalination of 0tterburn Roa~ in Otterburn, Clove~ Hill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currin, it i~ ~esolved ~hat Ot~erburn Road in 0ttorburn, Clover Hill District, be and it hereby i~ e~tablish- ed as a public road. And be it further re~Olv~, 9hat the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into th~ $@condary ~y~tem, Otterburn Road, beginning at the intersection wi=h Genitc Roa~, State Route 604~ and going southerly ~ile to end in a cul-de-sac. This r~que~t is inulnsi~e of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainag~ And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors quarentmem to the Virginia Depar+-ment of Transporta~io~ a right-of-way for this road. Otterburn is resorded as follows: ~lat Book 47, Pages 9, 10 & 11, August 20, 1984. Vote: Unanimous 89-991 This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Candlewick Road and Candlewick Court in Candle- wick, Clover Bill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currin, it is resolved that Candlewick Road and Candlewick Court in Candlewick, Clover Hill District, be end they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Candlewick Road, beginning at the intersec- tion with Woodlake Village Parkway, Beechwood Point subdivi- sion, State Route number to be assigned, and going south- westerly 0.05 mile to the intereection with Candlewick Court, then continuing southwesterly 0.04 mile, then turning and going northw~mterly 0.06 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Candlewick Court, beginning at the intersection with Candlewick Road and going northwesterly 0.06 mile, then turning and going westerly 0.10 mile, then turning and going southerly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage These roads serve 42 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of these roads. Candlewick is recorded as follows: Plat Book 55, Pages 7 & 8, November 3, 1986. This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Natural Bark Drive and Hourglass Court in Candlelamp, Section C, Matoaca District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currin, it is resolved that Natural Bark Drive and Hourglass Court in Candlelamp, Section C, Matoaca District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Natural Bark Drive, beginning at the inter- section with Qualla Road, State Route 653, and going north- westerly 0.20 mile to the intersection with Hourglass Court, then continuing northwesterly 0.04 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Hourglass Court, beginning at the intersection with Natural Bark Drive and going southwesterly 0.11, then turning and going southeasterly 0.07 mile, then turning and going southerly 0.03 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated virginia Department of Transportation drainage easements. These roads serve 19 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors 89-992 width right-of-way for ~atunal Bark Drive. This section of Candlelamp is recorded as follows: Sechio~ C, Plat Book 53, Pages 7 & 8, June 5, 1986. Vote: Unanimous This day the CouDty Environmental Engineer, in accordance with dirge%ions fro~ this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Sommerville Court, Midlothian District. seconded by Mr. Cu~rin, it is resolved that Sommerville Count, Nidlothian District, be and it hereby is established as a public road. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia D~Dar=ment of Transportation, be and ih hereby is requested to taka into the Secondary System, $ommerville Court, beginning at the intersec- tion with Otterdale Read Extended, State Route 667, and goinq easterly 0.29 mile to end i~ a cul-de-sac. This request i~ inclusive of ~he adjacent slope, sight distance and desiqnated Virginia Department of Tran~p©rtaticn draiaage This road serves adjacent commercial properties. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia D~partment of Transportation a 60' right-of-way for this ~oad. Sommerville Court is :ecorded as follows: Dedication of Sommerville Court. Plat Book 17'97~ Pages 1074, ~uly 23, 1986. This day th~ County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Handel Courh~ Dale Di~trlct. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currin, it is resolved that Handel Court, 5ale District, be and it hmreby is established as a public road. And be it further resolved, that the virginim Department O~ T~anspo~tation, be ~nd it hereby is requeete~ =c take into the secondary System, Handel Court, beginning at e~isting Handel Court, State Route 2152, and going northwesterly 0.05 mile, then turning and going westerly 0.10 mile to and at proposed Handel Court, Squire Hill Apartments Pha~ TI. This request is inclusive of the adjacent ~lop~, sight distance and deslgnat~d virginia Department of Transportation drainage This road ~erves as access to commercial property. And be it further resolved, that the Board Of Supervipor~ guarantees ko the Virginia Department of Transportation a 60~ right-of-way for this road. ~andel Court is recorded as follows: 89-993 Plat Book 19, Pag~ 53, September 8, 1972. Vote: Unanimous 14.B.2. ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR THE PURCHA$~ OF PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT AT REAMS ROAD ELEMENTARY SCNOOL On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board transferred $2,500 from %he Clover Hill District Three Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department for the purchase of playground equipment and surfacing material for Reams Road Elementary School. Vote; Unanimous 14.E.3. AWARD%NC OF CONTRACT FOR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY, ANALYTICAL TRIANGULATION AND GEOUETIC CONTROL FOR THE SOUTHWEST TWO-THIRDS OF THE COUNTY On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board awarded a contract to Woolpert Consultants to provide aerial photography, analytical triangulation and geodetic control services for the southwest two-thirds of Chesterfield County in an amount not to exceed $129,835 in conjunction with the Geographic Information System (G.I.S.) Project, which funding is available within the Geographic Information System (G.I.S.) project account; and further authorized the County Administrator to execute the neceeeary documents for said contract between Chesteriield County and Woolpert Consultants. Vote: Unanimous 14.E.4. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO P~STRICTIONS ON KEEPING INOPERATIVE MOTOR VEHICLES AND Pd~MOVAL OF INOPERATIVE MOTOR VEHICLES On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board set the date of December 13, 1989, at 9:00 a.m., for a public hearing to consider an ordinance relating to restrictions on keeping inoperative motor vehicles and removal of inoperative motor vehicles. 14.E.5. APPROPRIATION OF $1,500 FROM CLOVER HILL DISTRICT THREE CENT ROAD FUNDS TO CLOVER HILL HIGH SCHOOL FOR ASSIST- ANCE WITH EXTRA CURRICULAR ACTIVYTIES On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board appropriated $1,500 fr~m the Clover Mill District Three Cent Road Fund to Clover Hill High School for assistance with extra curricular activities which would permit the attendance of eleven students and two sponsors at the National Pom-Pon Competition in Orlando, Florida. 14.E.6. STATE COMPENSATION BOARD AgPROVAL OF ADDITIONAL POSI- TIONS FOR SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT There was brief discussion relative to the approval by the State Compensation Board of eleven temporary Correctional officer positions being available to the County to assist with current jail overcrowding; funding of the temporary positions being addressed through the State Biennial budget process prior to July 1, 1990; reimbursement to the County for salarie~ and 89-994 ~enefits~ the impact to the ~eunty i~ ths State were to not continue funding the positions; the 'reque~tlng of additional County fnnds a% tAo end of the ~iscal year, if needed, to continu~ the pcsitions$ the utilization of these temporary positions for courtroom security; etc. On motion cf Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Coffin, the Board approved eleven temporarily funded Correctional Officer positions, effective November 1, 1989 through June 30, 1990, tO assist with jell overcrowding; increased expenditures in the Sheriff Department's budget in the amount of $126,§00 which is the reimbursement to the C0un=y for the eleven positions for the period of NoveJ~ber 1, 1989 through June 90, I990; and further increased anticipated Compensation Board revenue by 14.F. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ITEMS 14.F.l. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION %N SUPPORT OF A REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES PLAN Mr. Welchons stated that, at its september 14, 19~9 meeting, =he Richmen~ Regiona~ Planning District Con~ission meeting adopted a resolution concmrring with the Water Resoures Ta~k Force recommsndatlon related to the ~evelopment of a Regional Water Re~our~ Plan an~ i~ requesting that each governing body adopt a statement of support for the plan. On motion of Mr. S~Ilivan, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board adopted the fullowiug resolution: W~R~A$, The Richmond Regional Planning District Commission has directed its Regional Water Resource~ Ta~k Force, in a re,elation adopt~ on ~eptamber 14, 1989~ to move expeditiously fol-~ard in the preparation of an effective the Commission and local governments a~d authorities in the WE~REAS, The Richmond Regional Planning District Contmis- sion has found that the development of a Regional Water Resources Plan ia clearly needed to provide a ~Ooperativ¢ framework for addressing the region's water supply needs issues, but such development can onl~ aucceeefull~ happen with the full support and co~itment of local governing bodies; W~EREAS, The Richmond Regional ~lannin~ District Cora%is- sion has requested local governing bo~ies of %ach locality within Planning District i~ an~ the Appoma:tox giver Water Authority to support the develo~ent of an mff~ctive Regional Water Re~ource~ ~lan by officially considering and adopting W~EREAS, The County of CheSterflmld supports the con=opt that development of water supply an~ ~rmatment facilitie~ have implications ~at ~o beyond its jurisdictional boundaries and, therefore, th~ Board of ~upervisors is fi:mly co~%tt~d to the development and a~option of a meaningful Regional the R~chmond area; and WHE~ASz The County of Chssterfleld fully understands and supports the concept that t0 be truly meaningful and effective a Regional Water R, sources Plan may well require ~ha~ all n~w or expanded water supply and treatment facilities within th~ region will hav~ to be developed in acco=dance with the plan. 89-995 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the County of Chesterfield this 8th day of November, 1989, requests the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission, as the legal and recognized comprehensive planning organization fer the region, to direct its staf~ and Water Resources Task Force to develop for the Commission's, Appomattox River Water Authority's, and each local jurisdiction's consideration and adopt a Regional Water Resources Plan that addresses the long term water supply, treatment and distribution needs of the region; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Board of Supervisors directs its administrative staff to actively participate and cooperate in the development of the Regional Water Resources Plan and to provide, in a timely fashion, all information, reports, and studies necessary to reasonably carry out the COmpletion of the plan by the Richmond Regional Planning District Coramission's Water Resources Task Force. 14.F.2. AUT~ORIg~ RIGhT-Of-WAY SECTION TO ACQUIRE TWO EASEMENTS FOR BEXLEY, SECTION 15 On motion o~ Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board authorized the Right-of-Way Section to acquire two remaining easements, which the developer, The Penn Company, was unable to acquire~ for Bexley~ Section 15, tO provide public sewer availability to 12 existing homes in the area. (It is noted staff is of the opinion that the ~ewer line along Providence Road was in the overall best interest of the County and indicated to the developer that the County would participate in the cost of the off-site extension and assist him in acquiring the easements.) Vote: Unanimous 14.F.3. CONSENT ITEMS 14.F.3.a. ACCEPTANCE OF DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG ENON CHURCH ROAD FROM AMOCO OIL COMPANY, A MARYLAND CORPORATION On motion o~ Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board accepted, on behalf cf the County, the conveyance of a variable width strip of land along Enon Church Road from Amoco Oil Company, A Maryland Corporation, and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. (A copy of the deed is filed with the papers of this Board.) 14.F.3.b. APPROVAL OF UTILITIES CONTRACT FOR QUEEN~PAR~, SECTION F On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board approved the following Utilities contract and authorized the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents for: 89-0417, Queenspark, Section F: Developer: Qneensmill Corporation Contractor: R.M.C. Corporation Contract ~mount: Water - $ 99,625.00 Sewer - $126,714.00 Estimated Total - $226,339.00 Total Estimated County COst: Water (Oversizing) - $ 19,282.05 (Refund thru connections) Estimated Developer Cost: $207,056.95 Code: 5H-58350-890732 (Oversizing) 89-996 APPROVAL OF WATRR C0~TRACT FOE GATES BLUFF, OFF-SITE WATER LINE On motion Of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board approved the following water contract and authorized the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents for: 89-066t~ Gates Bluff Off-Site Water Line: Developer~ Laveer Properties, A Limited Partnership Contract Amount: Estimated Total - $137,220.00 Total Estimated CountF Co~t~ Water {Oversizinq} $ 29,452.40 {Refund t~a connections} Water {0fruits) $ 29,~97.00 (Refund thru connections} E~ti~ahed Developer Cos~: $ 78,170.60 Code: (Ov~r$izing) 5E-58350-890732 (Offsite) §H-58350-~90731 Vote~ Unanimous 14.F.3.d. ACCEPTANCE O~ DEED OF DEDICATION gOAD, ~QUT~ 653~ FROM M~... aND ~RS. ZANE G~ DAVIS On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr~ Currin, the Board accepted, on behalf of th~ County, the conveyance of 10' and variable width strips of land alcn~ Second Branch Road from ~r. Zan~ G. Davi~ and Mrs. Carmen G. Davis, and authorized t_he County Ad~%inlstrator ~c execute the necessary dee~. (A copy of said plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous 14.F.3.e. APPROVAL OF A QUITCLAIM DEED FOR A 30 FOOT DRAINAGE EkSENRNT ACROSS P~OPEKT¥ OF MIDLOTHIAN COMPANY IN WOODLAND POND On ~otio~ of Mr. Sullivan~ seconded by Mr. Currln, the Board approved and authorized the Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator to execute a Quitclaim Deed to vacate a 30' drainage easement across property of Midlothian Company in Woodland Pond. (A copy o~ Said plat is filed with the papers Of ~his Board.) Vote: Dna~imuuz RESET A PUELIC HSARING TO QUITCLAIM COUNTY'S INTER~$T IN STRIP OF LAND ADJACENT TO TWIN~DIGE LANE On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board reset the date of December 13, 1989, for a publi~ hearing to consider the quitclaim of County interests in a small parcel of land adjacent to Twinridqe Lan~ fo Mr. Jay Rowe. Vote: Unanimous 14.P.3.~:. APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR FALLING CREEK PR~S~UPd~ SEgIER, PHASE On motioa of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board approved change Order Number 2 for Contract No. ~7-7076, Falling Creek ~ressure Sewer, Phase II~ in the amcnnt of $59;000 ($31,500 for material~ for "galvanized epoxy coating" for tunnel liner plates aud $27,~00 for the lowering Of 1600 89-997 feet of pressure sewer and two tunnels)~ which funding is available under the project to cover the change order. 14.F.4. REPORTS Mr. Welchons presented the Board with a report on the developer waker and sewer contracts executed by the County Administrator. 14.G. REPORTS Mr. Ramsey presented the Board with a status report on the General Fund Contingency Account, General Fund Balance, Road Reserve Funds, District Road and Street Light Funds, and Lease Purchases. Mr. Ramsey stated the Virginia Department of Transportation has formally notified the County of the acceptance of the following roads into the State Secondary System; ADDITIONS CLARENDON - SECTION Route 3597 (Iverson Route 3596 to Route (Effective 10-23-89) Road) - From 0.02 mile North 3598 Route 3598 (Colgrave Road) - From 0.02 mile North Route 3596 to North cul-de-sac Route 3579 (iverson Court) - FrOm Route 3597 to Northwest cul-de-sac 0.18 Mi. O.25 Mi. 0,10 Mi. QU~NSMILL - SECTION J (Effective 10-26-89) Route 3883 (Wesanne Road) - From 0.15 mile North Route 3500 to North cul-de-sac Route 3501 (Laureen Lane) - Prom 0.04 mile North Route 3500 to 0.04 mile East Route 3883 Route 3884 (Wesanne Terrace) - From Route 3553 to Southwest cul-de-sac Route 3885 (Laureen Place) - From Route 3501 to North cul-de-sac Route 3886 (Laureen Circle) - From Route 3501 to Northwest cul-de-sac Route 3887 (Laureen Court) - From Route 3501 to Northwest cul-de-sac 0,25 Mi. 0.28 Mi. 0.14 Mi. 0.07 Mi. 0.05 Mi. 0.05 Mi. DEER RUN - SECTION 1 (Effective 10-30-89) Route 4700 (Deer Run Drive) - From Route 360 to 0.03 mile South Route 4701 Route 4701 (Velvet Antler Lane) - From Route 4700 to Route 4702 Route 4702 (Velvet Antler Drive) - From 0.01 mile South Route 4701 to 0.02 mile South Route 4706 Route 4705 (Velvet Antler Place) - From Route 4702 to Northeast cul-de-sac O.22 Mi. 0.06 Mi. 0.31 Mi, O.O7 Mi. 89-998 ADDITIONS DEER RUN - SECTION 1 ~Effectlv~ 10-30-89) (continued Route 4706 (Pull Rack Drive) - From Rout~ 4702 to Route 4713 ROute 4706 {Sika Lane) - From Route 4713 to Route 470~ Route 4710 (Full Rauk Circle) - From Route 4786 to South o~l-de-sac Route 4711 (~ull RaTk Ceuxt) - From Routs 4706 to Northwest cul-de-sac 0.55 Mi. 0.27 Mi. 0.07 Mi. 0.04 ~i. Route 4712 (Full Rack ~Iace) - From Route 4706 to Northwest cul-de-sac Route 4713 {Duck Rub Drive) - From Rout~ 4706 to 0.0~ milo West Rou~e 4716 4714 ($ika Court) - From Route 4706 to Ro~te &715 (~aster ~tag Drive) - From Route 4713 to 0.05 mil~ Eas~ Route 4713 Route 4716 (~uck Rub Court) - From ROUt~ 4713 to Southeast ~ul-de-sac 0.~4 ~i. 0.36 Mi. 0.12 Mi. 0.06 Mi. 0.06 Mi. 15. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, ~econded by Mr. adjourned at 11:30 p.~. (EST) until 9:00 a.m. 22, 1989. (BST) on ~ovember County'AdminiDtrmtor/ 89-999 Chairman