Loading...
12-13-1989 MinutesBOAP, D OF SUPERVISORS MiNu'r~S DECE~ER 13, 1989 Supervisors in Attendance: Mr. G. H. Applegate, Chairman Mr. C. ~. Currin, Jr, vice Chairman Mr. Harry G. Daniel Mr. M. B. sullivan Hr. Lane H. Ramsey County Administrator Staff in Attendance= Ms. Amy Davis, Exec. Asst. to Co. Admin. Mr. William Davenport, Commonwealth's Atty. Mrs. Doris DeHart, AsSt. CO, Admin., Legis. Svcs. and Intergovern. Affairs Ms. Joan Dolezal, Clerk tc the Board Chief Robert Eanes, Fire Department Mr. Bradford S. Hammer, Deputy Co. Admin., Management Services Mr. Thomas ~. Jac0bson, Dir. of Planning Mr. Robert Masden, Deputy Co. Admin., Human Services Mr. Jacob W. Mast, Jr. Nursing Home Admin. Mr. R. J. McCracken, Transp. Director Mr. Richard McElfish, Dir, of Env. Eng. Mr. Stev~ Micas, Co. Attorney Mrs. Pauline Mitchell, Dir. of News/Info. Services Col. Joseph Pittman, Chief of Police Mr. Richard Sale, Deputy Co. Admin., Development Mr. Jay Stegmaier, Dir. of Budget Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr., Dir. of Parks & Rec. Mr. David Welchons, Dir. of Utilities Mr. Frederick Willis, Dir. of Human Resource Management Mr. Applcgate called the regularly scheduled meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. (EST) 1. INVOCATION Mr. Apptegate introduced Reverend Doug Hill, Pastor of Beulah United Methodist Church, who gave the invocation. 2. pT.mDG~ OF A?J~GIANC~ ~ '£~ FLAG O~ ~H~ ~NITED STATES OF Chief Robert L. Eanes, Jr. led the Pledge of Aliegianee to the ~lag of the United States of America. 89-1040 3,A. N0VEMBER 22, 1989 On motion of Mr. Coffin, seconded hy Mr. Suliiv&n, the Board approved the minutes of ~ovsmber 22, 19~9, ag amsnded. Vote: Unanimous 3.B. DECEMBER 6t 1989 On motion of ~r. Sullivan, s~eonded by ~. Coffin, the Board approved the mi~tes o~ Decembe~ 6, 19~'9, ~ s~bmltted. Vote: UnanJ-~u$ Mr. R~sey stated the regularly ~h~dul~d ~ch0~l ~oard ~eeti~ meetin~ on January 9, 1990. Mr. Sale displayed a ~treet ~ign fr~ ~h~ Envi~o~ental Engine~rlng Depar~ent, with n~rlual block n~b~r identifi~ation and large lettering, that will be installed at a!! major thoroughfares in the County, which D~ogr~ anticipated for implementation ever the next two to years. 5. ~OARD COMMITTEE ~,E~ORTS Mr. Daniel raDorte~ he attended the Capital Region Airport Commission meeting at which it was noted there continues tO be a decline in passenger enplan~ment hut an increase in cargo traffic; the virginia Association cf Counties/virginia M~nicipat League dinner at which legislative programs for bot~ organization~ were presented: and stated he plans to attend the Metropolitan Planning Organlzatlon/Riohmond Regional ~lanninq District Commission meetin~ ~t which it is anticipated that a ~equesf will be submitted requesting endorsement Qf alternative st~y routes for the John Rolls Parkway, primarily the route that crosses the James River and t~min~te~ at Robio~s Read. Mr. Mayas reported he attended the opening of the Ettriok/Matoaca Park which was attended by Mr. Greenwood, Dr. McCIure, Virfinia State Unlv~relty; stated he felt the en:rance to the southern end of the County w~s now a regpectable One and ooK~ended those involved for their outstanding work; the Appomattox B~sin Industrial Development COrporation meeting, at which he was elected Vice Presidant; and the Crater Planning District Commission meeting, at which he ~as elected Vice Chairman. Mr~ Sullivan reported he and Mr. Currin attended the ~oard of Supervisors/School Board Liaison Committee meeting, which di~oUS$1On$ he fel~ were progressing satis~astor£1y, stated it appear~ that differences rega~din9 the use of school facilitie~ have b~e reconciled and a report ~hould be forthcoming to the Board of SUpervisors in January, 1990; reported that th~ School Administration's Budget, including infe~mati0n relative to ~r0jectionu as to student enrollment which component of the budget, has been submitted to ~he School Board for the upcoming year; that he and Mr, Mayas ~ttsnded Bu~get/Audi~ Committee meeting to rev~sw estimates of income and general expenses and that ~fforts in this process will be continuing for the next several month~. 99-1041 Mr. Currin reported he and ~r. Sullivan attended the Board of Supervisors/School Board Liaison Committee meeting which' discussions he felt were very fruitful and appea~ to be progressing well; attended with Mrs. DeHart and Mr. Ramsey a Co~ittee meeting, chained by Senator Russell and Delegate Watkins, regarding the studying of State and local infrastructures in revenue resources; attended with Mr. Ramsey the Richmond/Tri-Cities Solid Waste Recycling Conference at which recycling issues were discussed; and attended with Mr. Mayes the Crater Planning District Commission meeting at which recycling issues were also discussed. 6. REQUESTS TO ~OST~ONE ACTION~ EMERGENCY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES IN TW~ ORDER OF PRESENTATION On motion of Mr. Mayes, s~conded by Mr. Currin, the Board deferred until January 10, 1990, at 2:00 p.m., Item 11.K., Requests for Mobile Home Permits and Item ll.L., Requests for Rezoning, due to an error in advertising; added to existing Item ll.E.3., Requests for Bingo/Raffle Permits, an additional requmst for a bingo/raffle permit from th~ Midlothian Rotary Club for 1989; deferred to an appropriate date for scheduling purposes Item 7.B., Resolution Recognizing Mrs. Yvette B. Ridley for her Outstanding Services to the Community Services Board; and withdrew, until an appropriate date and time, Item 9.A., Consideration of Packaged Wastewater Treat~nent Systems; and adopted the agenda, as amended. Vote: Unanimous 7. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS 7.A. MS. LOUISE A. TURNER~ LUCY CORR NURSING BOME Mr. Jacob Mast, Director of the Lucy Corr Nursing Moms, introduced Ms. Turner, cornm~nded her for her quality service to the citizens of the County and stated she ~ould be missed by her friends and coworkers. On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: WREREAS, Ms. Louise A. Turner will retire from the Lucy Corr Nursing ~ome, Chesterfield County, on January 1~ 1990; and W~ER~AS, Ms. Turner has provided eighteen years of quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHeReAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss Ms. Tnrner's diligent service; and WHEREAS, Ms. Turner, as a Nursing Assistant, has been a faithful, loyal employee; she has always provided quality care to the residents assigned and continually displayed a cooperative and pleasant manner; Ms. Turner can be~t be characterized by her good attendance, competence as demenstrated on the skilled unit, her team spirit and the high regard she always showed her residents. She will be greatly missed by staff and residents alike. NOW, TBEP~FORE BE IT RESOLVED, that ths Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Ms. Louise A. Turner add extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County their appreciation of her service to the County. AND, B~ iT FURTHER' RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to Ms. Turner and =hat this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. 89-1042 Vote: Unanimous Mr. Appl~qate presented th~ executed re~olution ~o Ms. Turnert commended her cutst~mding service, recognized her daughter, Sandra, and othe~ staff member~ who w~re present, and wished her well in her retirement. There ware ~o hearings of citizens en unscheduled matters or claims. 9.~. ~kPOINT~NT$ - CE=BTEREIELD PLANNING COXXISSION On motion of the Ecard~ the Board appointed Mrs. Carol Boislneau to fill th~ unexpired term of representing the Midlothian District, to the Chesterfield County Planning Commission, whose term is s~fective January 1, 1990 and expires December 31, 1991. Vote: Unanimous The Eoard requested that a rss~lutlon commending ~r. Kelly's service during hi~ kenur~ with the Planning Commission be prepared for presentation at a future date. 10, P~LTC ~F~%RING~ 10.A. TO CONSIDER A~ ~RDINANCE TO AMEND T~ CODE O~ T~ COUNTY OF CHeSTerfieLD, 1978~ AS AMENDED, BY ENACTING SECTION 14.1-27.I RELATING TO RESTRICTION~ ON K~PIMG INOPERATIV~ MOTOR VEEICLES AND REMOVAL OF INOPERATIVE MOTOR VENICLE~ Mr. Micas stated this date and time had been advertised for pu~l~o hea~ing to consider an ordinance amendment to the of the County of Chemte~field, 1978, as amended, relatinq to restrictions on keeping inoperative motor vehimles and the removal of inoperatlv~ motor vehicles and briefly explained the Mr. John ~enninq$ and Mr.~ A. M. childress expressed coneern~ that inoperative meter v~hicles present unsightly appearances, depreciat~ th= value of adjacent properties and voice~ support for the p~opceed ordin,nce. There was discussion relative tO the £urty-dey.notice period to permit the removal of unlawfully maintained ineperativ~ vehicles being in compliance with State law~ smendr~en: of the said ordinance to reflect that the proposed oMdina~ce is not applicable to l~c~nse~ businesses with appropriate zoning approval; the shifting of responsibility fo~ regulating the keeping and/or removal of inoperative motor vehicles from the Planning Department to the License Inspector's Depart~ent; the ability o~ the proposed ordinance to provide a more posi- tive enforcement mechanism; continuation by staff to handle such violations on a complaint basis only, u~less said ~nsDector nots~ e~ch v~olatlon ~uring performance of duties; etc. There was further discussion relative to implementation County requirement that individuals desiring to license vehicles provide proof of insurance Coverage on said vehicle{s); consideration of revisions to current State law to address the problem Of licensing vehicles that have no insurance coverage; 89-1043 On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board adopted the following ordinan0e: AN OP, DlltANCE TO ANEND'~m~ CODE OF T~ECOUNTYOF CBESTEI{FIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY ENACTING SECTION ~4.1-27.1 KELATING TO RESTRICTIONS ON I~EPING INOPE~ATIVEMOTOEVEEICLESAND RI~,IOVALOF INOP~TIVSHOTORVEEICI~E BE IT 0NDAINED, by t~e Bear0 of Supervisors bf the Ceunty of Chesterfield, Virginia, that: (1) The Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, ae amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 14.1-27.1 Restriction on keeping inoperative motor vehicles; removal'~ such vehicles. (a) It shall be unlawful for any per,on, firm or corpora- tion to keep, except within a fully enclosed building or structure or otherwise ~hielded or screened from view~ on any property zoned A, R-88, R-40, R-25, R-15, R-12, R-9, R-7, R-TH, R-~_F, MS-i, MS-2, O-1, 0-2, C-l, C-2, C-$, C-4 or C-5, any motor vehicle, trailer or eemi-trailer, as such are defined in Section 46.1-1 cf the Codeof Virginia, 1950, as amended, which i~ inoperative. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corpora- tion to ~eep outside of a fully enclosed building or structure and shielded or screened from view by covers, on any property zoned A, E-88, R-40, R-25, E-15, R~12t R-9, R-7, R-TH, E-MF, MH-1, ME-2, 0-1, 0-2, C-l, C-2, C-3, C-4 or C-5, more than one motor vehicle, trailer or semi-trailer, as such are defined in Section 46.1-1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, which is inoperative. {c) The owners of property zoned A, R-88, R-40, R-25, R-15, R-12, R-9, R-7, R-TH, R-MF, MH-1, MH-2, O-1, 0-2, C-l, C-2, C-3, C-4 Or C-5 shall remove therefrom any such inopera- tive motor vehiole~, trailers or semi-trailers that are not kept within a fully enclosed building or structure, within thirty (30) days after being given notice by the County to remove such inoperative motor vehicles, trailers or semi-~railere. ~otice to remove shall be deemed given when mailed to the owners of the property on which such inoperative motor vehicles, trailers or semi-trailers are located, by certified mail, return receipt requested, te the same address to which real estate tax bills are mailed to such owners of property. If such owners of property do 'not remove such inoperative motor vehicles, trailers or semi-trailers from such property within thirty (30) days after being given notice to do so by the County, then the County, its agents or employees may remove such inoperative motor vehicles, trailers or s~mi-trailers from such property and, after giving an addition- al ten (10) days notice to the owners of the vehicles, may diepoee of such motor 'vehicles, trailers or semi-trailers. Notice of disposal of such motor vehicles, trailers or semi-trailers shall be deemed given when mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the last known address cf the owner of such inoperative motor vehicles, trailers or semi-trailers. The cost of removal and disposal of such inoperative motor vehicles, trailers or semi-trailers shall be chargeable to the owners, of the property from which such inoperative motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers were removed and to the owners of such inoperative motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers, and may be collected as taxes and levie~ are collected. Every cost authorized by this section against the Owner of the property from which such inoperative motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers was removed shall constitute a lien against said property, the lien to continue until actual payment of such costs has been made. 89=1044 (d) As used in this section, an "inoperative motor vehicle" shall meae any motor vehicle which is not in operating cendition~ or which for a period of sixty days or longer has been partially or totally disassembled by the removal'of tires and wheels, the engine, or other essential parts required for operation of the vehi~ta or on which ther~ ~r~ displayed neither valid license plates nor a valid inspection decal. (e) The provisions of this section shall not apply to any b~siness lawfully conducted on property that is zoned to permit the keeping of inoperative motor vnhicles, trai!er~ or semi-trailers; nor shall the provisions of this section apply to a licensed ~sineBs which o~ June 26, 197Q, wasregnIarly engaged in business as an automobile dealer, salvage'dealer or scrap processor. Vote: Unanimous I0.B. TO CO~$IDER AN /LWiENDMENT TO T~E FISCAL Y~AR 1959-90 BUDGET O~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY TO INCREASE TOTAL A~ROPRIATIONS BY $2,016,Q00. T~ !NCE~ASE FUNDS THE ACQEISITION O~ ~QUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF INFOP~ATION SYST~M~ TECR/~OLOGY Mr. Hammer stated this date and time had ~n advertised for a public hearing to consider an ~mendm~nt to the FiEcal Year 1989-98 County budget to increase total appropriations by $2,015,570 ~hich increased funds represent lease purchase proceeds for the acquisition of equipm~n$ and soft,are for the Department of Information Systems Technology. NO One came forwar~ tQ speak in favor o~ or in opposition to the mutter. entire County administrative documentation System end is an essential element of it~ oper~tfo~ which should hav~ available every modern technology available~ hhat the lease purchase process is a viable component of the County's fina~clnq process which expands the cost over the useful lif~ of the purchase and enables the County %o p~rchase s~-~e and voiced support for the proposed amendment. On motion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board amended the Fiscal Year 1989-90 Budg~ of Chesterfield County to increase total sppropriation~ by $2,015,570 for the acquisiPion of equipment, software and services to undertake the computer upgrade prejec~ for the Department of Infor~tlon Systems Technology; and £ur=her appropriated $2,015~578 in lease purchase proceeds for the acquisition of equipment, software and serviua~ for =he Department of Information Systems Technology's 3090 Co,purer Upgrade Project, as follows: Software 200,000 Disk storage/Printers 58,57~ And further, the Board authorized the Connty A~inls~rato/ to purchase of the equipment, ~oftware ~nd s~rvic~s fo= the 3090 Computer Upgrade Project. (It i~ noted this Ieas~ purchase was anticipated in the FYPQ Budget.) Mr. Sullivan and Mr. C~rrin stated ~he Board and Administration are aware of their position regarding the use of th~ l~a~s purchase financing process; however, they agreed with Mr. the importance of its functions. 89-1045 Ayes: Mr. Appleqate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mayes. Abstained: ~r. Sullivan. NEW BUSINESS ll.A. DOCUMENT PRESERVATION PROJECT FOR CIRCUIT COURT On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved a Document Pre'servation Project for the Circuit Court Clerk's Office to preserve photoetatically copied documente (approximately 600 deed and/or will books) that are presently deteriorating due to use and light exposure which are in need of immediate preservation and which project is to begin no later than February 1, 1990; appropriated $63,700 from the General Fund Balance for FY1989-90 to fund the Document Preservation Project for the period of January - July, 1990, which costs inelude the rental of equipment to copy said documents and store them on optical storage media, the acquisition of equipment and supplies and the provision of 1-2 temporary personnel from the Virginia State Library Archiviet Department to store and retrieve documents. (It is noted no costs other than thos~ identified will be incurred at this time). ll.B. R~SOLUTION REQUESTING STORER CABLE TO RECONSIDER ITS ANNOUNCED RATE INCRE~SB Mr. Hammer summarized information relative to Btorer Cable, its franchise and its decision to raise basic cable service rates monthly from $17.50 to $19.95 and referenced the 1984 Cable Communications Policy Act enacted by Congress eliminating the County's ability to regulate cable television rates. Discussion, questions and comments ensued relative to numerous complaints received by the Board members regarding service, rates, exposed wiring, maintenance, etc.; a reeolution from the Board requesting Storer Cable reconsider its intent to raise rates; the County's legal recourse, if any, to submit a Request for Proposal for the purpose of bringing another franchise to the County; the daily receipt of complaints received by the County being forwarded to the General Manager of Storer Cable; that roughly 50% of the rate increase was a result of added debt resulting from two leveraqed buy-out acquisitions over the past seven years. Mr. Daniel stated he believed that most of the justification for rate increases were either al increased service or b) some function of increased cost to deliver those services and that debt for leveraged buy-outs meets neither one of those criteria. Be stated that even though Congress has removed the ability to regulate rates at the local level that that there should be an opportunity for discussion and that dis~useion should be held in a public arena. He stated he felt the public has a right to know what portion of funds are for operation of the business. Mr. Sullivan concurred that as much information as possible should be made available on this matter; that a resolution should be forwarded to the Federal Delegation for their support; agreed that it i~ the responsibility of the Board to protect the public except where the law (Cable Communications Act of 1984) prohibits the exercising of that responsibility and/or authority; expressed concern that a many of his constituents complaints relative to Storer Cable relate to maintenance, service, rates, exposed wiring, ~t¢; and requested that staff examine alternative methods for bringing competitive cable service companies to the County; etc. 89-1046 Storer Cable are the sam~ concerns az noted by ~r. Sullivan (i.e., service, rates, maintenance~ et~} and many have e×pres~ed discontent to the point of discontinuing the~r service. On motion of Mr. Daniel~ seconded by Mr. Mayas, the ~oard adopted the ~cllowlng resolution~ WHgRF. AS, On June 27, 1979 ~he ~oard of Supervisors u~ Chesterfield County awarded a franchise to Che~t~rfiel~ Cablevision, Inc. (now STorer cable) to provide cable television services to citizens of Chesterfield County; ~D~ WHE~d~AS, Pursuant to such ~ranchi~e agreement the Board of Supervisors was expressly authorized to regulate the rates ohar~sd by $torer Cable to consumers of its television services; and WHEReaS, In 1984 Congress enacted the Cable Communications Policy Act which ~ltminated th~ County's ability to regulate cable television rates; and WI~EREAS, S~orer Cabl~ has anneunced tha~, effective January 1, 1990, it will raise it~ rates by 14 p~rean% for ~a~ic cabl~ S~rvice an~ that, aS a result, Storer Cable custom, rs will pay $2.45 more per month; and W~EP~AS, This rate increase wall raise the basic cable service charge per month from $17.50 to $19.95, making Storer Cable's basic servi=e rate significantly higher than any other rate charged in the Richmond Metropolitan area; ~u~ W~RF~S, Storer.Cable's existing bamic oharge of $17.50 is already higher than th~ rates charged elsewhere in the Richmond ~ctropoli=a~ area; and WHEREAS, The January 1, ~990 rate increase follows a $2.00 rate increase that~ock effect in February of 1989~ le~ than one year ago; and WHEREAS, The announced January I~ 1990 rate increase i~ an unreasonable charge ~iven ~he high percentage of cabl% use by County citizens and the lack of any competition aff%~ting Storur Cable's cable s~rvice delivery. NOW, THE~/~FQR~ BE IT RESOLVED~ by the Board of Supervisors of Chgeterfleld County the= =he soard, by this resolution, r~gnest~ Storer Cable to ~eOonmider the announced rate increase and to leave the r~te ~er basic cable service at its present level. SE IT FUKTHE2 RESOLVED that Storer Cable shell be notified by the COnnty Administrator of th~ large number of ~iTi2eDs that have complained about poor ~ervioe and high subscriber rates and staff is directed to prepare an analysis of ~he feasibility of issuing a "2equest for Proposals" for the purpose of attracting another cable operator tQ the Scanty, and that appropriate letters of support be sent to Congress supporting Senate Bill I068 to return cable regulation to local goverr~en= and promote effective cable competition. Vets: Unanimous 89-1047 ll.C. PETITION FOR PBONE RATE CMARGES FOR MATOACA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Discussion, questions and CO--outs ensued r~lative to a petition filed by certain citizens of the ~atoaca District to petition C & P Telephone Company to initiate procedure~ necessary to drop toll service charges for telephon~ service from Matoaca to the Richmond calling area: the differences in Extended Area Service calling and F×t~nd~d Area Calling; a similar request submitted by citizens in the Enon area of Bermuda Magisterial District; etc. On motion oi Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board authorized the County Administrator to forward to C & P Telephone Company a request to eliminate toll service charges for telephone service from the Matoaca Magisterial District to the Richmond calling area and that ~on~ideration be given to offering E×%ended Area Calling (~ervice similar to existing long distance service except charges are 80% less) to the Richmond calling ar~a to the residents of the Matoaca Magisterial District. Vote: Unanimous ll.D. APPOINTMENTS ll.D.1. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BIG~WAY SAFETY COMMISSION On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board ~uspended its rules to simultaneously nominate/appoint Lieutenant Colonel Samuel O. Smith, representing the Matoaca Magisterial District, to serve on the Chesterfield County Highway Safety Commission. On m6tion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board simultaneously nominated/appointod Lieutenant Colonel Samuel O. Smith, representing the Matoaca Magisterial District, to serve on the Chesterfield County Highway Safety Commission, whose term is effective i~unediately and is at the pleasure of the Board. Vote: Unanimous ll.D.2. COMMITTEE ON THE FUTURE On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board suspended its rules to ~imultaneously nominate/appoint Mr. William Garnett, representing the Midlothian Magisterial District, to serve on the Committee on the Future. Vote: Unanimous On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Ceftin, the Board simultaneously nominated/appointed Mr. William Garnett, ropresenting the Midlothian Magisterial District, to serve on th~ Committee on the Future, whoso term is effective i~ediately and is at the pleasure of the Roard. Vote: Unanimous ll.D.3. CHESTERFIELD COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board suspended its rules to simultaneously nominate/reappoint Dr. Ronald Jessup, representing th~ Dale Magisterial District, and ~imultaneously nominate/appoint Ms. Judith Warren, representing 89-1048 the Matoaoa ~sqisterial Distrist, Go se~va on the Chestarfi~id Conununity Servica~ Hoard. On motion of Mr. Danie:~ ~econded by Mr. Mayas, the Board simultaneously nominated/reappointed Dr. ~enald Jes~up, reprementinq the Bale Magisterial District, and ~imultaneou~ly nominated/appointed Ms. Judith Warren, representing the Matoaca Magisterial District, to serv~ a three year ter~ on the Cheatsrfield Community ~erviees Board, who~e terms are effective immediately and will ~xpire December 31, 1992. 1t.D.4. CO~4~U~IT¥ CORRECTIONS R~$OURCES BOARD (CCRB) On ~otien of ~r. S~llivan, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board suspended its rules to ~imultan~ou~ly Dominate/reappoint M~. Gary K. Johnson and Dr. Sandra Lee Starkey to the Community Corrections R~curces Hoard (CCRH). Vot~= Unan~mou~ On motion of ~r. Sullivan, seconded by Hr. ~ayas, the Board simultaneously nominated/reappointed Mr. Gary K. Johnson and Dr. Sandra Lee S%arkey to serve a t~o year term on the Community Corr~otien~ R~eUrces Board (OCRB), whose terms a~e effective January 1, 1990 and will aspire December 31~ 1991. Vote: Unanimous I1.E. CONSENT ITEMS It.E.1. STAT~ ROAD ACCEPTANCE This d~y the County Environmental R~glneer, in accordance with directions ~rem this ~oard, made report in writing UpOn his examination of Chimney House Road, Chimney ~o~se Court, chimney ~ouee Place and Chimney HOnae Terrace in Chimney Souse, ~ecttons 1 and ~, Clover Hill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on ~otion of ~r. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currln, it is resolved that Chimney Hones Road, Chimney House Court, Chimney ~ouae Place and Chimney House Terrace in Chimney Mouse, Sections 1 and 2, Clover Hill District, he and they h~reby are established as public roa~s. And be it further re~olvedz that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the aeeeadary System, Chimney ~0use Head, beginning at the intersection with Brandermill Parkway, $tat~ Rents 1921, an~ going westerly 0.04 mi!~ =o ~he interseotion with Chimney House CO~rt~ tha~ eantinuing westerly 0.07 mile, then turning and go~ug southwestexly 0.05 mile to the inter,action with Chimney House Plac~ ehen continuing southwesterly 0.06 mile to the intersection with Chimney House Terrace, th~n turnin~ and going southerly 0.08 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Chimney HOUSe Court, beginning at tbs intersection wi~h Chimney House Head en~ going southerly 0.04 mile, then turning and going so~th- westerly 0.05 mile, then turning and going easterly 0,05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Chimney House Place, beginRi~g at the intersection with Chimney House Road and goinq ~outherly 0.07 mil~ Go ~nd in a cul-de-sac; and Chimney House Terrace, be- ginning at the intersection with Chimney House Road and going northerly 0.06 mile, th~n turning an~ going northeasterly 0.04 mile, then turning and goin~ northerll 0.06 mile to e~d in a cul-de-sac. 89-1049 This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage These roads serve 57 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' riqht-of-way for all of these roads. These sections of Chimney Rouse are recorded as follows: Section 1. Plat Book 44, Pages 53 & 54, November 14, 1983. Section 2. Plat Book 45, Pages 21, 22 & 23, February 29, 1984. This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his ex~ination of Peach Grove Road, White Pickett Lane, White Pickett Court, White Pickett Circle, Meredith Bill Terrace and Pleasant Ridge Road in Ashton Woods North, Section C, Dale District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currin, it is resolved that Peach Grove Road, White Pickett Lane, White Pickett Court, White Pickett Circle, Meredith ~ill Terrace and ~leasant Ridge Road in Ashton Woods North, Section C, Dale District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Peach Grove Road, beginning at the southern end cf existing Peach Grove Road, State Route 4002, and going southerly 0.03 mile to the intersection with White Pickett Lane; White Pickett Lane, beginning at the intersection with Peach Grove Road and going westerly 0.05 mile to the inter- section with White Pickett Court, then turning and going northwesterly 0.03 mile to the intersection with White Pickett Circle, then continuing northwesterly 0.03 mile to the inter- section with Meredith Bill Terrace, then turning and going northerly 0.07 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. Again White Pickett Lane, beginning at the intersection with Peach Grove Road and going easterly 0.10 mile to the intersection with Pleasant Ridge Road, then continuing easterly 0.06 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; White Pickett Court, beginning at the inter- section with White Pickett Lane and going southerly 0.03 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; White Pickett Circle, beginning at the intersection with White Pickett Lane and goinq northerly 0.04 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Meredith Hill Terrace, beginning at the intersection with White Pickett Lane and going ~outherly 0.08 mile to end in a cul-d~-sac~ Pleasant Ridge Road, be- ginning at the intersection with White Plckat= Lane and going northerly 0.04 mile to tie into existing Pleasant Ridge Road, Ashton Woods North, Section B. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and deaignatsd Virginia Department of Transportation drainage These roads serve 62 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of these roads. This section of Ashton Woods North is recorded as follows: Section C. Plat Book 62, Pages 48 & 49, August 3, 1988. 89-1050 This day the County EnviroIunental Engineer, in accordance with directi~n~ from this Doard, made repe~t in writing upon his e~amination of Buckhorn Road, Trophy Lane and Trailbrook Drive in Deerwood, Section C, ~atoaca District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Daniel, ~econded by Mr. Carrie, it is resolvsd that ~uckhorn Road, Trophy Lane and Trailbroo~ Drive in Deerweod, Section C, ~atcaca District, be and they hereby are establisked as public roads. And be it further received, that the virginia Department Transportation, be and it hereby i~ requested to take into the secondary System, Buckhorn Rcad, beqinnin~ a~ existing Buckhorn Road, State Route 3000~ and going southerly 0.22 mile to the intereect~on with Trophy Lane, then continuing southerly 0.04 mile to the intersaution with Trailbroek Drive, then continuing ~outherly O.ll mile to ena in a cul-de-sac; Trophy Lane, beginning at the intersection with Buokhorn Road and going easterly 0.Q7 mile to end in a temporary turnaround; and Trailbrook Drive, beginning at the intersection w{th Buckhorn Road and going w~terly Q.06 mile, then turning and going southwesterly 0,18 mile to ~nd in a temporary turnaround. This request is inulu~ive cf the adjacent slope, sight and designated Virqinia Department of Transportation drainage ·hese roads serve ~ lots. And be i~ fur=her reeolved, that the soard of supervisors ~uarantee9 to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of thee~ roads. Thia section O~ Desrwood ia recorded as follows~ ~sction C. Plat ~ock 39, Pages 77 & 7~, October 2~ Vote: Unanimous This ~ay the County Environmental Enqineer~ in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writin~ upon his examination cf Woodland Pond Parkway, Waterfowl Flyway, Leaser Setup Landing, Gadwell Court, Whistlin~ Swan ~oad and Pintail Place in Woodland Pond, Sectioe 3, Mateaca District. Upon consideration wher~ef~ and on Eotion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by ~r. Carrie, it is resolved that ~oodland Pond Parkway, Waterfowl Fly~ay, Lesser Scaup Landing~ g~dwell Court, whi~tling Swan ~oad and Pintail Place in Woodland Pond, Section 3, Mateaoa District~ be and they hereby nra established as public roads. And be it further resolvsd, that th~ Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary ~ystem, Woo~!and Pon~ Parkway, beginnfng at the e~d of ~xisting Woodland ~ond 9arkway, state Route ~7~, and going aoutheasterly 0.~0 m~la to the inter,action wit]] Waterfowl FlyWay, th~n continuing southeasterly 0.!3 mile %o tho inter- eection with Whistling Swan Road, then Continuing southeasterly 0.Gl mile to end in a dead end; Waterfowl Flyway, beginning at the intersection with Woodland Pond Parkway and going easterly 0.23 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. Again Waterfowl Flyway, beginning at the intersection with Woodland Pond Parkway and going westerly 0.~1 mile to the intersection with Lesser Scaup 89-1051 Landing, then continuing westerly 0.II mile, then turning and going northerly 0.25 milo to end at the intersection with Gadwell Terrace, State Route 3678; Lesser Scaup Landing, beginning at the intersection with Waterfowl Flyway and going northerly 0.09 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. Again Lesser Scaup Landing, beginning at the intersection with Waterfowl Flyway and going southerly 0.12 mils, then turning and going westerly 0.07 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Gadwell Court, beginning at the intersection with Gadwell Terrace, State Route 3678, and going westerly 0.14 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Whistling Swan Road, beginning at the intersection with Woodland Pond Parkway and going sasterly 0.24 mile to the intersection with Pintail Place, then continuing easterly 0.05 mile to end at proposed Whistling Swan Road, Woodland Pond, Section 4; and Pintail Place, bsginning at the intersection with Whistling Swan Road and going northeasterly 0.19 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Dspartment of Transportation drainage These roads serve 84 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Dspartment or'Transportation a 50' right-of-way 'for all of these road~ except Woodland Pond Parkway which has a 70' right-of-way. This section of Woodland Pond is recorded as follows; Section 3. Plat Book 57, Pages 77, '78, 79, 80, 81, 82 and 83, July 9, 1987. Vote: Unanimous This day the County Mnvironmental ~ngineer, in accordanc~ with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Castle Hill Road, Queens Crown Drive, Robious Crossing Drive, Prince Brian's Court, Park Ridge Road and Lady Marian Lane in Qucenspar~, Sections B, C and E, Midlothian District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currin, it is resolved that Castle Hill Road, Queens Crown Drive, Robtous Crossing Drive Prince Brian's Court, Park Ridge Road and Lady Marian Lane in Queenspark, Sections B, C and E, Midlothian District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, bo and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Castle Mill Road, beginning at the inter- section with Robious Crossing Drive, State Route 832, and going southeasterly 0.14 mile to the intersection with Queens Crown Drive, then continuing southeasterly 0.08 mile to the inter- section with Park Ridge Road, then continuing southeasterly 0.22 mile to end at existing Castle Hill Road, State Route 4081; Queens Crown Drive, beginning at the intersection with Castle Hill Road and going northerly 0.14 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Robious Crossing Drive, beginning at existing Robious Cro~sing Drive, State Route 832, and going northerly 0.06 mile to the intersection with Prince srian's Court, then continuing northerly 0.07 mile to the intersection with Park Ridge Road, then continuing northerly 0.05 mile to end at the intersection with Lady Marian Lane; Prince Brian's Court, beginning at the intersection with Robious Crossing Drive and going westerly 0.04 mile~to end at proposed Prince Brian's Court, Queenspark, Section G; Park Ridge Road, beginning at the intersection with Robious Crossing Drive and going north- easterly 0.30 mile to end at the intersection with Castle Hill ~9~1052 Road; and Lady ~arian Lens, beginning a~ =he intersection with Bobious CrosPin~ D~ive and going westerly 8.04 mite to end at proposed Lady Marian Lane, Queenspark, Section D. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, eight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage These roads serve 61 lots. And be it further re~ctved~ that the Board of S~perVisors guarantess to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50* right-of-way for all o~ these roads. These sections o~ Queenspark are recorded as follow~: Section B. Plat Book 53, Pages 20 & 2I, April 19, 1986. Seution C. ~lat seek 56, Pages 90 & 91, March 27, 19S7 and April 30, 1987. Section E. Pla~ nook 60, Page 68, ~arch 2, 1988. Vote: Unanim0u~ lI.E.2. STAT~ ACCEPTANCE OF ~ESTOR RO~B, R~R~L ADDITION P~OJECT On mo%ion of Mr. Daniel, ~cond~d by ~r. Currin~ the Beard adopted ~ha follow~ng resolution: W~EREAS, Ssutlon 33.1-72.1 C1 of thc Code of Virginia, as amended, allo~s %h~ Virginia Depar%msnt of Transportation to take streets into the Seoonda~y System of State ~ighways; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Virginia Deparkment of Transportation have determined ~h~ Nestor Koad qualifies for acceptance into the State Secondary System under 33.I-72.t C1 of th~ Code Of 9ir~inia~ as amended. Supervisors requests the Virginia bepar~ent of Transportation Road, then proceeding in a southerly direction for a length ~ection 33.1-72.1 C1 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. BE IT FURTHER ~SOLVED, ~at %he Chesterfield County of Supervisor~ guarantees, to the Co~onwealth of Virginia a fifty foot unrestricted right-of-way for th~ ~reet with necessaxy drainage easements. The right-of-way is recorded in recorded as follows: Deed Bock 1918~ pages. 1568-1571, D~d Deed Book 2058, page 1757. 11.~.3. Pd~QU~STS FOR BINGO/~AFFLE PERMZ~S Mr. Sullivan disclosed to the ~oard that hm is a member of the Midlothian Rotary Club and has been advised by the County Attorney that, since he has no financial in=erect in the Club except as a contributor~ hi~ membership in that organization do~s not =on~tituts a conflict of interest p~rsusnt to the Virqinia Comprehensive Conflict of interest Act and he intended to vote on this matter. On motion of Mr. Daniel, secon~e~ by Mr. Currin~ approved requests for Binqo/Raffle permit~ for organizations for the oalendar year as indicated: the Board following 89-105~ ORGANIZATIONS TYPE YEAR Clover Quilters Raffle 1989 St. Ann's Church Raffle 1989 Monacan Athletic Boosters Raffle I990 Knight~ of Columbus 96546 Binge/Raffle 1990 Beach Community Grange 9958 Binqo 1990 Enon Civic Association Raffle 1990 St. Augustine Bingo/Raffle 1990 Lucy Corr Nursing Home Raffle 1990 Chester Civic Association Raffle 1990 Chesterfield Fraternal Order of Police ~47 Bingo/Raffle 1990 American Legion Post 4186 Bingo/Raffle 1990 Virginia Belles Softball Club Bingo 1990 Midlethian Rotary Club Bingo/Raffle 1989/1990 Vote: Unanimous ll.E.4. SBT DATES FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ll.E.4.a. TO CONSIDER CONVEYANCE OF PROPMRT¥ AT AIRPOR~ INDUSTRIAL PARK TO ALPIT AMERICA On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board set the date of January 10, 1989, at 9:00 a.m., for a public hearing to consider the conveyance of a 6.054-acre parcel of prope~ty at the Airport Industrial Park to Alfit America. ll.E.4.b, TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 15.1 0~ THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 15.1-32 RELATING TO THE PROHIBITION OF SOLIC~TATION FOR PROSTITUTION On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by ~r. Currin, %he Board deferred until January 10, 1989, at 9:00 a.m., consideration of a request to set a date for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, by adding a new Section 15.1-32 relating to the prohibition of ~olicitation for prostitution. Vote; Unanimous ll.E.4.o. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED~ BY AMEND- lNG AND REENACTING SECTIONS 18.1-21, 18~-2~ 21.t-271 AND 21.1-273 RELATING TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF GRAVES ON SUBDIVIS~Q~...~A. SCHEMATIC PLANS AND SITE PLANS On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board set the date of January 24, 1989, at 9:00 a.m., for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the Code of ~h~ Ceun~ ~ Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, by amending and reenacting Sea{ions 18.1-21, 18.1-24, 21.1-271 and 21.1-273 89-1054 schematic plans and site plans. ll.E.4.d. TO CONSIDER A~EMDMENT~ TO THE COUNTY CHARTER AND ADOPTION OF THE 1990 L~GI$~ATIV~ PROGRAM Mr. Currin stated several citizens had contacted him regarding the new o~rtifieation form that is being used in conjunction with the filing of applications for the land =ss hsnk program which has generated much confumion and opposition from those affected by it. He e~pre~sed deep concern as to ~he impact of the grandfatheriug ol~u~e legislation which was removed on ~he citizens of Chemterfield County involved in the land use bank program and stated he felt action should be taken to consider having the form simplified and the legislation repealed, if possible, Mr. Ramgey stated the ann~al filing date procedure to remain in the land use program had not changed; however, tho~e individuals mxp~riencing problems with tko certification for~ could contact the Assessor's Office to arrange for ~ami£ioatione of the enacted legislation; amendment of the County'g I990 Legislative Program to include a request for the restoration of the 1980 "graa~£athering'~ date preventing development-related zone prior =o 1980~ the preparation and ~ub~ittal with th~ cer~ifieation form of a ~orest Management ~lan as prepared by the State Forester; appropriate notification of ~hOse property owners affec~e~ by this process =hat they have until October, 1990 to obtain assistance an~ ~ub~it %he necessary docu3nentation; suggestions that considers- Dion be given to repealing the current legisla=ion and the seeking of assistance from the Federal DelegatloD in doing so; etc. After further disuussion, i= wa~ generally agreed that staff would amend the Chesterfield County 1999 Legislative Program to include a request for the re~toration of the 1980 ~'grandfathering'~ date preventing the removal from the l~Bd use pro,ram for all percel~ zoned to a development-related zone prior to 1980. The Board further requested that ~rs. De,art mee~ with Senator Nolan, patron of the bill~ and fhe County's Delegation to discuss the ramifications of repealing said legislation. Mr. Applegate pre~ented each of the ramaininq L~gielative ~rogr~ items ~or Board discussion, with the exception of impact fee~ which ieem it was agr@%d would be discussed separately. There were questions, commen~s and discussion relative to the electronic voting equipment, notification to adjecenb landowners for rez0ning amendments through th~ use of current real estate tax assessment r=cords or the ~nnual lan~ book, amendment of ~he personal Drcpsrty tax prorating procedure regarding the ~elecation of an individual from e non-prorating locality to a prorating looalit~ and vice versa, the inclusion of the Chesterfield County Courthouse with Magnolia Grange and E~plngton in the r~quest for himtorie designation/restoration funding, amendment to the Co~c to double the ne~ worth and income limitations for eliqibi~-~ for Lax relief for %he eld~rty when the real estate ~ax assessment ia based on a highest and best use basis rather than the existing use, etc. The Board generally agreed to r~cee$ for fiftee~ minutes. 89-105S Discussion, questions and comments ensued relative to legislation to grant Chesterfield County the authority to assess impact fees on new development. There was lengthy discussion regarding the assessment of impact fees on new developments as granted to Northern Virginia and their use as compared to Chesterfield County and its use of such funds for needs other than transportation; the definition of the terminology "new" development; if impact fees were approved for Chesterfield County, that consideration be given to utilizing and applying said fees to school, fire station, park, library, and other capital needs within the County; requesting approval of impact fees in addition to utilizing the cash proffer with conditional zoning process; whether or not impact fees should be implemented via a Charter amendment Or General Law procesS; Mr. Daniel voiced support for the position Of the Virginia Municipal League to grant all local governments the authority to assess impact fees on new development as granted to Northern Virginia; stated he felt new development was any development that "was not developed"; reference copies of legislation relating to Delegate Cranwell's original impact fee bill and th~ adopted Northern Virginia impact fee legislation; that development would be exempt from impact fees if site plan or subdivision approval had been granted; stated he felt comfortable in attempting to obtain what the County proposed last year; etc. When asked, Mr. Micas stated the definition of "new develop- ment'' was any development that had not received site plan or subdivision approval. Mr. Mayes expressed concern that such a definition was too broad; there was no specific delineation of the terminology "full development" or "new development" at this time; that there was no avenue available for public input at thi~ time and stated it appears that the current legislation relates principally to the control of reads rather than these other elements that make up quality development ~uch a~ public ~ewer and public water. Mr. Sullivan stated he felt the definition of n~w development as provided by the County Attorney was acceptable but expressed concern that Chesterfield County does not have the sa~e capital needs as Northern Virginia and the current legislation is applicable to only road improvements. He stated this County has needs that go beyond transportation, which include schools, libraries, parks, etc. He stated his recommendation would be that the Board support the position of the Virginia Municipal League to grant all local governments the authority to assess impact fees on new development, not necessarily as granted to Northern Virginia, and that he would like to see that position, as a Charter amendment, conveyed to members of our legislative body. Mr. Micas stated, if the General Assembly were to approve impact fees for the County, implementation would probably be effective July l, 1990; it would then be several months before the Board adopted a local impact fee ordinance so there would be a considerable amount of time for appropriate notification before the impact fee could be effected in Chesterfield. Mr. Currin stated he felt if the Board were to initiate any action it should be as clearly defined as possible and that impact fees should be applicable to capital needs other than just transportation. M~. Applegate stated that impact fees were brought before the working on it. He stated Northern Virginia's ability to assess 89-1056 impact fees is only on transportation and he was more concerned with ~hool~, fir~ ~ation$, liDraries, st~. ~e stated he would pre,er to assess or have the ability to accept financial off-site but it appeared to him that the Board ought to go one financial proffers and conditional zoning or with impa~t fe~s and if the choice were impac= fees, they ought to be applicable to transportation, schools, fire stations, libraries, ere., because it was his understanding that if financial proffers were accepted, impact fees could not b~ a~seesed. When asked, Mrs. DeHart ~at~d ~he h~d understood, d~ring the Beard of Supervlsors/Legi~lative Delegation's work ~ee~ion r~lative to %he 1990 Legislative Program, that Senator Russell had indicated he preferred that the County request impact f~e~ through a Charter a~endment process. Mr. Daniel stated he had previously ~gge~ted that ~he Count7 ~eek approval for impact fees through a Charter amendment; however, there was not a ~ajority agreement for such action. Rt. Applegate stated Chesterfield County currently has enabling legislation to accept cash proffers with conditional ~se zoning was ~keptical that Chesterfield County could obtain approval to implement impact fees for ~ehools~ parks, librarims, etc., if Northern Virginia could only get impact fees for tran~Dcrtatien decision of this governing body as to whether or not they maximum {i.e., schools, roads, fire stations, libraries, parks, recovered. He stated he ~upporke~ forwarding %0 the Legislative Delegation a statement on impact fees that would having both impact ~ses and camh proffers On zoning and in Delegatiom a very clear message that %he Soard fav0re impact fees and favors the use of said fee~ for all items of capital up the existing inventory of 25-35,000 undeveloped homes that hav~ already been approved from a zoning standpoint and do not defined "new and/or full development" ncr structured the ~tilize the broadest de£initien under General Law; that the Board assess the feasibility/ramifications of whatever action is taken by the General A~sembly and, if that does not achieve deleted or deferred, were specifically agreed upon by the Board of Supervisorm and adopt~a ~z the 1990 Legislative Prcgra~ to be presented to the General Assembly for approval; and further that thm ~ate of $~nuary 10, 1990, a~ 9=00 a.m., be set for a ll.F. C05~4UNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS ll.F,1. STREET LIGHT REQUESTS On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by approved obtaining cost estimates for street lights at the following locations: 1. Mr. Mayas, the Board the installation of 14520 Rivermont Road, Bermuda Magisterial District; 2. 14500 Jefferson Davi~ Highway at entrance to Mack's Iron CO., Inc., Bermuda Magisterial District; 3. Move ~treet light located on Pole $KA26 to Pole $JG26 on Old Stage Road, Bermuda Magisterial District; 4. ~unday's Restaurant Area, Clover Bill Magisterial District; and 5. Intersection of Donegal Magisterial District. Vote: Unanimous Drive and Qualla Road, Matoaca ll.F.2. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION COST APPROVALS 0a motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board deferred until January 10, 1990, approval of street light installation costs to determine if the residents would compromise and'accept one expensive street light installation or three of the least expensive street light installation for the following locations in the Clover Hill District: 1. Adkins Road and Ronaldton Road, $841.00; 2. Cherylann Road and Francil Drive, $1,195;00; Francil Drive and Kayv~ Road, $2,905.00; and 4. Cherylann Road and Vickilee Road, $712.00. Vote= Unanimous ll.G. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ITEMS Ii.G.i. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE QUITCLAIM OF THE COUNTY'S INTEREST IN STRIP OF LAND ADJACENT TO TWIN- RIDGE LANE Mr. Sale stated this date and time had b~a advertised for a public hearing to con~ider the Quitclaim of the Ceunty'~ interest in a strip of land adjacent to Twinridge Lane. No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the matter. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board approved a Quitclaim Deed of any of the County's interest in a narrow strip of land lying between Providence Road and land owned by Mr. Jay Rowe adjacent to Twinridge Lane; and authorized the Chairman of the Board and the County Adminis- trator to execute the necessary Quitclaim Deed. (A copy of said plat is filed with the papers of thi~ Board.) Vote: Unanimous 89-1858 approvsd the following sewer contract and authorized the COunty And 5P-58350-898~00R OutfallI. Vote: Unanimous Bexiey, Section 15 - Outfall Sewer ~xtension: Developer: The Penn Company Contractor~ Castle Equipment Corporation Contrac%Ame~nt: Estimated Total Total B~timated Couety Cost: Westewetsr - Esfimated Cash R~fund (Additional Work) Westewater - Esfimated Refund From Capital Recovery Charges Code: Cash Capital Recovery Charges further, the Board to $1~9,145.29 $1%4,966.83 $ 37,060.00 $ 17,118.46 5F-5724D-8988OOR 5P-5~$50-~907~ $114,96~.$3 from ll.G.2.b. REQUEST TO QUITCSAIM A 16 FOOT SANITARY SEWER EASE- MENT ACRO$~ PR0~ER~M OWNED ~Y ~R. ~O~aT STAPLES ON SORTHSIDE O~ ROU?~ 360 On motion of ~r. Daniel, seconded by ~. ~ayes, the Board mpproved and authorised the Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator to execute e Quitclaim Deed to vacate a 16 foot sanitary sewer ea~m~Rt across property owne~ by Mr. ~oberf Staples located on the ~outhside of Route 360. (A copy of ~aid plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote~ Un~n~%ous ll.G.2.e. SBT PUBLIC H~ARING DATES ll.G.2.C.1. TO CONSIDER CONVEYANC~ OF RIG,S-OF-WAY A~D A99R0V~ C01~VEYANCE 0F EASEMENT FOR LORI ROAD IMPROVEMENTS On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayer, tho Board authorized ~he County Administrator to e~¢oute an option agr~men~ between Chesterfield Count~ an~ the Virginia Department of Transportation for the conveyance of right-of-way and C&P easement along Lori Road for improv~ment~ to Lori authorized the Chairman of the Board and the County Administrmter to execute the nece~a~Tf easement agr~emen%~ and ~et the date of January 10, 1990, a~ 9~00 a.m., for a public hearin~ t~ consider the conveyance of s~id right-of-way. copy of said plat i~ filed with tho papers o~ this Board.) Vote: Unanimou~ 11.G.2.c.2. TO CONSIDER CONVEYANCE OF RIG~T-OT-WAY AND BASE- TO C05B¥'$ LAKE on motion of ~r. Daniel, seconded by ~r~ M~yos, the Board authorized the Coun=y Administrator to execute an option agreement between Chesterfield Count~ and the Virginia Department of Transportation ~or the conveyance of right-of-way, temporary construction easement and C&P easement across the Dale Fire Station site for Route 10 improvements ~9-1059 from JeEEnp Road to Cosby's Lake; authorized the Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator to execute the necessary easement agreements; and set the date of January 10, 1990, at 9:00 a.m., for a public hearing to consider the conveyance of said right-of-way. (A copy of said plat ia filed with the papers of this Board.) ll.G.2.d. ACCEPTANCE OF DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG OLD HUNDRED ROAD FROM MIDLOTHIAN COMPANy On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Hayes, the Beard accepted, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of a variable width strip of land along Old Eundred Road from Midlothian Company and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed of dedication. (A copy of said plat is filed with the papers of this ll.G.2.e. ACCEPTANCE OF DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG OLD HUNDRED ROAD FROM CENTERPOINTE ASSOCIATES, LTD. PARTNERSHIP On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Hayes, the Board accepted, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of a variable width strip of land along Old Hundred Road from Centerpointe Associates, Limited Partnership and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed of dedication. (A copy of said plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) ll.G.2.f. ACCEPTANCE OF DEED OF DEDICATION FOR EXTENSION OF OLD HUNDRED ROAD FROM IMG/GREENSPRING ASSOCIATES LTD. PARTNERSHIP Mr. Applegate disclosed to the Board that he is a trustee of the subject property which is owned by IMG/Greenspring Associates, LTD. Partnership, declared a conflict of interest pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act and excused himself from the meeting. On motion of Mr.' Daniel, ~ecended by Mr. Mayer, the Board accepted, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of 11.623 acres of land for the extension of 01d Hundred Road from IMG/Greenspring Associates Ltd. Partnership and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed of dedication. (A copy of said plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Ayes: Mr. Cnrrin, Mr. Daniel, Mr. Hayes and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Applegate. Mr. Applegate returned to the meeting. 11.G,3. REPORTS Mr. Sale presented the Board with a report on the developer water and sewer contracts executed by the County Administrator. ll.M. REPORTS Mr. Ramsey presented the Board with a status report on the General Fund Contingency Account, General Fund Balance, Road 89-1060 Purehase~ and School BOard Agenda. Mr. Ramscy stated th~ Virginia Department of Tran~portatlon has formally notified the County of the acceptance of the fellowinq ~oeds into the State Secondary Sygkem~ ~DIT1ONE ~t~G~H CRADDOCK POINT~ S~CTIO~ 5 (E~lectlve 11-16-~9) Route 1567 (Evelyn Drive) - From Route 3570 to 0.06 milms Nor%Hi Route 3~70 0.06 Mi. Route ]~73 (~aplevale Road) - From Route 35?0 West eul-de~sac 0.27 Mi. ROute 3574 {Maplevele Place) - From Roate 3570 to Rout~ 3573 0.07 ~4i. EX~URY - S~CTIO~ 1 [Effective 11-17-$9) Route 4260 {Exbury Drive} - From Rout~ 720 to Southwest cul-de-sac Route 4261 l~xbury Court} - From Route 4260 to We~t cul-de-sac Route 4~62 (E×h~ry Terrace) - From 0.11 mile Wes~ Route 4260 to 0.03 mite East Route 4260 B~X~¥ - $~CT%O~ 11 (~f~ective 11-17-89) Rout~ 2641 (Cardiff Road) - From 0.13 mile ~outheast Route 4272 to Route 4280-West Roate 4286 {Ivybridqe Crossing) - From Route 2693 to Route 2641 Roate 4281 (Cardiff Lane) - From Route 2{41 to Roate 647 0.08 Mi. 0.24 Mi. 0.14 ~i. 0.04 Mi. JOHNSTON WILLIS DRIVE - PHASE I & II (~ff~ctive 11-~2-89) Roate 777 (Jehneton Willis Drive) - From Route 60 to 0.43 mile South Route 66 0.43 ~i. BRANDON, SECTION A (Effective 11-15-~) Roate 2331 (Sunset Fills Drive) - From .36 miles Southwest of Route 653 to Southwest cul-de-sac Route 4290 (Sunset ~i1~5 T~rraoe) - From Rout~ 2331 to Southeast cul-de-sac Route 4291 (Sunset ~ills Court) - From Roate 2331 to Southeast cul-de-sac 0.30 si. 0.11 Mi. 0.09 ~i. POWDER~/~ - SECTIONS D & ~ (~ff~ctive 12-1-~9) Route 1068 (Glendower Road) - From 0.11 mile ~orthwest Route 1137 %o Route 4166 Route 416~ (Glendower Circle) - From Route 1068 co Northeaet cul-de-sac 0.23 Mi. O. 12 Mi, 89-i061 ADDITIONS (continued) LENGTH POWDER~-~ - S~CTIO~S B & E (~ffective 12-1-89) Route 4166 (Drakewood Road) - From 0.03 mile Southwest Route 1068 to 0.04 mile Northeast Route 1068 BAILEY RIDGE ESTATES - SECTION B (Effective 12-1-89) 0.07 Mi. Route 4101 (Pettish Branch Road) - From Route 2036 to 0.02 mile Southwest Route 4104 Route 4104 (Bailey Mountaih Trail) - From 0.12 mile Northwest Route 4101 to 0.24 mile Southeast Route 4101 0.10 Mi. 0.36 Mi. HUNTERS LANDING - SRCTION 4 (Effective 12-1-89) Route 4131 (Poachers Run) - From Route 4130 to Northwest cul-de-sac Route 4138 (Blind Trap Lane) - From Route 413I to Route 4141 Route 4139 (Tracker Drive) - From Route 4131 to Route 604 ROUte 4140 (T~acker Court) - From Route 4139 to Southeast ual-de-eau Route 4141 (Decoy Lane) - From Route 4130 to 0.04 mile Southwest Route 4131 0.50 Mi. 0.09 Mi. 0.19 Mi. 0.06 Mi. 0.38 Mi. ii.I. EXECUTIlrE SESSION On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board went into Executive Session puxsuant to Section 2.1-344(a) (3) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, to consider the acquisition of real property for public use and consultation with legal counsel pursuant to Section 2.1-344(a) (7) of the Code of Virqinia, 1950, as amended, regarding settlement of probable litigation involving Chinaberry Drive -- Boulders Extension. vote: Unanimous Reconvening= On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board adopted the following resolution: WBEREAS, the Board of Supervisore has this day adjourned into Executive Session in accordance with a formal vote of the Board, and in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, the virginia Freedom of Information Act effective July 1, 1989, provides for certification that such Executive Session was conducted in conformity with law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Supervisors does hereby certify that .to thR. best of each member's knowledge, i) only public busi~ss matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirement~ under the Freedom of 89-1062 which thi~ certifieatfon applies, and ii) only ~ch public business matters a~ were identified in the ~otion by which ~xo~u~ive S~ssien was convened were hear~, discussed Or considered by the Board. No member dissents from this ce:tifi- ca,ion. ~he Board being polls~, the vote was as Mr. Daniel: Aye. Mr. Sullivan~ Aye. Mr. Currin: Aye~ Mr. Apple~ate: Aye. ~r. Applegate stated it was nmeessary ~o susDend the rules to a~ an item to the &qenda. On motion of Nr. Daniel~ seconded by Mr_ Currlnr the Board suspended its r~les to add ~c the agenda Item ll.M., Authorization To Purchase Property Located a% 6701 West Krauma Roa~, ll.M. AU~H©RIZATION ~© PURC}L~SE PROPERTY LOCATED A~ 6701 On me,ion of Mr. Currin, eeoonded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board approved and authorimed th~ County Adminis~raLo~ to execute any necessary documents for the purchase of 0.561 + acre parcel of land, including on~ buildiDg (01d Data Preceding ~uildin~) of approximately 8,500 square f~et, located at 6701 We~ Krause Road in an amount no% %o exc~e~ $400~000; and appropriated said funds fxom the Re~ervs for Capital Projects for the purchas~ of said property. 12, ADJOU _P~._. AND ll.J. L~NCH s~oo~o~ ~y ~r. ~ayes, resolved ~ha~ th~ Board adjourn at 12,00 Neon (EST) unfiI 9:00 a.m. (EST) on January 10, 1~90. Vote~ Unanimous La~e B. Ramsey ~ County Administrator 89-1063 Chairman J