The URL can be used to link to this page

2009-11-18 PacketCHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ~, Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 2.A. Subject: County Administrator's Report County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: 0~l Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: The County Administrator will update the Board on the progress of various projects as requested by the Board of Supervisors. Preparers Marilyn Cole Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Assistant County Administrator ^ No # 000001 County Administrator's Top 40's List I. II. Critical Proiects/Activities 1. Airport Entrance Improvements 2. Airport Master Plan 3. Amelia Reservoir Project 4. Census 2010 5. Community Risk Analysis/Emergency Service Coverage 6. Countywide Comprehensive Plan/Public Facilities Plan 7. Eastern Midlothian Re-development - Chippenham Square - Spring Rock - Stonebridge (formerly Cloverleaf Mall) - Streetscaping 8. Hydrilla Issue 9. Irrigation Policies/Demand Management for Water Use 10. 2010 Legislative Program 11. Low Impact Development Standards 12. Magnolia Green CDA 13. Mass Grading Ordinance 14. Meadowville Interchange 15. Midlothian Turnpike/Courthouse Road Streetscape Improvements (Towne Center) 16. North American Project (at Rt. 288 and Rt. 10) 17. Postal Zip Codes 18. Private Sewer Treatment Facility 19. Streetlight Policy 20. Ukrops Kicker Complex/Poseidon Swimming -Stratton Property 21. Utilities Policies and Managed Growth 22. Watkins Centre 23. Woolridge Road Reservoir Crossing Project 24. Wind Energy Systems OnEOing Proiects/Activities 1. Capital Improvement Program 2. Capital Regional Collaborative Focus Group 3. Citizen Budget Advisory Committee 4. Efficiency Studies -Countywide 5. Federal Stimulus Package - Energy Block Grant - Economic Development - Police Department - Recovery Zone Bonds 6. Financial/Budget Issues 7. Fort Lee Expansion 8. In-Focus Implementation -Phase II (Payroll/HR) 9. Joint Meetings of Board of Supervisors/School Board OO~~Q2 Page 1 of 3 Updated - 11/10/09 County Administrator's Top 40's List 10. RRPDC -Large Jurisdiction Committee 11. RRPDC -Transportation Strategies Work Group 12. UASI (Regional) 13. Upper Swift Creek Water Quality Ordinances III. Completed Proiects/Activities 1. Board's Appointments Process 2. Business Climate Survey 3. Cash Proffers 4. CBLAB Discussions 5. Citizen Satisfaction Survey 6. COPS Grants 7. Efficiency Studies -Fire Department and Fleet Management 8. Efficiency Study -Quality/Chesterfield University Consolidation 9. Employee Health Benefits -Contract Renewal 10. Financial/Budget Issues - Adoption of 2010 Budget - Adoption of County CIP - Adoption of School CIP - Bond Issue/Refinancing - AAA Ratings Retained 11. 457 Deferred Comp Plan Approved 12. Hosting of Hopewell Website 13. Impact Fees for Roads 14. In Focus Implementation -Phase I 15. Insurance Service Upgrade (ISO) for Fire Department 16. Leadership Exchange Visits with City of Richmond 17. Legislative Program - 2009 18. Meadowdale Library 19. Minor League Baseball (new team) 20. Multi-Cultural Commission (Quarterly Reports due to Board) 21. Planning Fee Structure (General Increases) 22. Planning Fee Structure (Reductions for In-Home Businesses) 23. Planning Fees (Holiday for Commercial Projects) 24. Potential Legislation -Impact Fees/Cash Proffers 25. Property Maintenance -Proactive Zoning Code Enforcement (countywide) 26. Property Maintenance -Rental Inspection Program 27. Public Safety Pay Plans Implemented (Phase I) 28. Redistricting Calendar/Process Report - 2011 29. Regional Workforce Investment Initiative 30. Southwest Corridor Water Line 31. Sports Tourism Program with Metropolitan Richmond Sports Backers 32. Ukrops Kicker Complex -soccer fields (opened 8/09) 33. Upper Swift Creek Plan (Adopted) 34. VDOT Subdivision Street Acceptance Requirements (~l'~~~~a3 35. Website Redesign 36. Wireless Internet Access in County Facilities Page 2 of 3 Updated - 11/10/09 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 2.6. Subiect: County Administrator's Comments County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: The Accounting Department has completed preparation of the County's FY2009 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, which includes financial statements audited by KPMG, LLP, independent auditors. Rob Churchman, engagement partner from KPMG, LLP, will be at the meeting to formally present the report to the Board as required by the Code of Virginia. Preparers Marv Lou Lyle Attachments: ~ Yes Title: Director of Accounting ^ No ooooo~ ~r, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 2.C. Subiect: County Administrator's Comments County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Mr. David Schulte, Executive Director of the Petersburg Area Regional Tourism Corporation, will be present to brief the board on the work of this organization, of which Chesterfield is a member, along with the cities of Petersburg, Colonial Heights and Hopewell and the counties of Prince George and Dinwiddie. Preparers Janice Blakley Title: Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No 000005 .H 'V ~~ 'N h ~ ~ t ~ C O V ~ _ ,~ C V a 3 ~ _ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ y ° = ~ a ~ o ~ ~ V O = O V ~= ~ ' ( j i a ._ ._ ~1 L ._ ._ r- ~~ ~L H L J c 0 v a~ O ._ ._ m N 01 .i ~"1 O O t0 O rl N ~ ~ s 9 ~i ~ ~~ O N 00 N N pp O 0~1 N IA ~O ~ M ~~oo ~ o0 00 ~ O ~~~ N ~ ~ V ~- _~ o 00 ~ '~ ono ~ 4~ o ~ a` ~ N O O ~ O 00 M ~ ~ I~ M ~ L O (~ Q rl O ~ ~ ~ ~ U O .= cV O a1 ~ ~ i ~ N =~~~~_ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V O ~ ,~ ~ ~ O ~ O -~ N - _ ._ L - ` ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ O i .~ p ~ p ~ i o ~ n d J ~ a cn ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ = L p ~~ ~ O M ~ 3 ~+ _ ~ 4~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ._ ~ ~ 4~ ~ L n ~ ~ ~ ,_ ~ ~ L i ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ o ~ O ~ ~ > ~+ ~ ~+ ~ ~ V ~ ~A ~ ~ _ _ 4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ •~ ~ 4~ ~ 4~ _ ~~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ,_ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ a~' ~_~3 > ~ oc . ~ o ~ ~;~ ~~ L ~ v ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ L ~ O O ~ ~ v ra ~ o r~ ~ Q ~ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ o c a9 0 ' m °saE~~~ 0 Ecco..,° 6 O g a Q d a 0 ~ C.~ C a J ~ y a w~ 3 0 u y ~ ~_C^OEV L' °«o ~ ' ! Y !~ 4 aa e o Y; o ~ L C ~ x u $ u a ,L~j o~ E a 3 a o V L y~ ° nyq !! O a~' n 3~°a=rte ~ ~~N 0u0°~~"`M pq 1.~.1 ~ ~~~ `~ E ~~ 79 i ~ 1~1 ~ u o q ga. oe3 c ' ;E~~~ N~E ~ 9 y ~ ~co~o u.,°~ °v Q '~,) `< p ~ a ue«N~'"E~ra eo~EEaYo .+ c ~ cZo«'S o$«Eu oai.°~~~ouo~ ~ ~ .. ifoohcc,k°-a. a ~ z 4 M a 6 ~~`.~o a c_ o '~ Y~ ~ E N ° _ r a ' a vi c o o aLaf. '"0o°„m E;c ~ OL~r<< OZf.J~ UL O~ W N s 8 z ~'" z~i~ t~i ~ ~ °~~ v0 ~ ~ ~~°Wy ~~~~~ o ® m x ~" ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ '~ .3 ru 0 ^~ ^~ N U N "~ Q. N ~ ~ ~ •~ O - ~ L ._ •~ _ ._ •- O ~ 'V O ~ ~ , L ~ ~ a--~ ~ L ~ _ ' ~ ~ Q ~ ~ a--~ ^- ~ ._ ~ O ~ ._ ^- •- ~ > ~ 4> ~ -~--' ' ~ ~ ~' ~ O ~ cn ~ ~ J O . ~.,, O ~, ~ ._ 4~ X •- O O 4~ Z w ~ ~ t.L oC ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ L 0 a~ '> D D O~ ~ ~ ^~ ~ = L. ~ ~ O ^~ ~~ = a V ~ ^- O ~'i ~ ~ i ~+ ~ 0~=~ ~ V~ ~- ._ _ ~ ~- L ~ ~..~ - cQa ~Wp?S .~ 3 = ~ ~ _ ~~o~~ ._ ._ O-v'~~'O O.~ ~ O ~ O. VVQ~QV~ O U J s V y ~O Q L H p t V api O C '~ d 0 .~ c a~ L t C C 0 V .~ 0 3 f c 3 O 'a H as r V C O V L ~ ~ y ~ ~~ t t ~ V ~ C V V L t 'C L V H H t H ~ 3 3 L ~ p V i ~ ~ ots o~S ~ V C ! ! W V1 c c ~ c ~ c c ~a ~ 'a ~ G o ~ ~ ' ~ ~ 0 0 o ' 0 0 V V V ~ _ _ _ i a L 3 c ~~ i ~ L7 y 'a ~ U O .~~~ p1 H ~a f ~ U as f C O Z c ~ .a ~°- W L p H C D ~~ ~ ~ m ~ C ~ C Y t a - ~ O O C ~ H ~ ~ ~ C = L ~ ~ ~ m C fA ~ ~ ~ t ++ H L p i :C - y ~ O ' t f0 ~ = V ~ + + ~ p ~ O V Z ~ V c V t r a c c u+ v~ c -° a i p N C V p V 3 ~ a ~ c ~ ao fp a C ° C ° ~ ~ 3 S ao ~ .O ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ' ~a a ~ E E ~ ~ a = = m a n n = = = = = ~ n a~ a~ v a o `~ ~ p t p ~ Y d p - C p w eC ~ F- f o ~ c °. ~ H ~ 'p d p t ~ O1 'p a f0 c 3 ~ V O m p `i' L L ~ A a o p ° ~i V ~ f ~= o L O a ^~ ^~ a ~ ~ ,~ ~~ ii ~i i~ '~ ~,~, , y~ E '' , i - ~' . ~ ~ d ~ i ~ y ~ i. ` ~ ~ ~x i ' t a .i• ~ i '3s e; ~, ~~~ . 13~ ..5~ 1{ .~ 1 J f i A ~I~ «? '~i i'i i •~ ~i 4 s~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Pit. , ~ +`, ~ ; ` ~ ~ i ~i •1 ~ :~,. i . ~ s1 i i ~ 1 'iS i i -~ 'f ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~e~ i, 4 '~ ~ iii ~ t e i .=i ~ ° i, 1F r ~. i i e~i s i r i~I ii ~ + ~ ~ ~ i i.i ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~`~~ ~ ~ a~~~ ~.~ ~~ .~ ~ ~ ;~ ~~ ~ ~ i ~~~ ~. }~ b ~ ~ ~_ •w 5~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~3 ~ 5~~~~ ~~ ~~. ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ = ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ .~ ~.~ ~~~~ ~ .~~~~ ~~~~i~ ~~~sUFs ^~ ^~ r-- O ^~ ^~ H t ~ ~ ~+ .~ ~ ~ ~ • - ~a ~ ~ L ~ ~ 3 V ~; ~~/~/ W V/ a~ c J c 0 L ~ V ~ ~ ~ _ O ~ ~~ ~~ ~+ ._ ~ ~ ~ ~' t o = ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ O O O `~ ~ :~ '~"r i ~ ~ s ~ ~ -°a L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~~ ~ O L ~ ~ .~ ._ ~ ~ ~ ~ ._ ~ ~ i fQ ~ W ~ ~~ ~~ ~ _ o ~ i i O ~ ~ ._ ~ .~ _ ~ ~ a'n a~ ~ ,~ V ` ~ L = ~ ~ ~ = O ~ H L t V L ~~~ d ~3 a~ ~a L ~ ~ ~ ~ (n to ~ N •- L L ~ Q ~ ~~ •- ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O .- L .~ ~ L ~- ~ i 0 U > ~ ~ ,-~ L V L 0 .~ .~ C O L U 1 H ~ o ._ ~ ._ ~ a~ r~ ~ O V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ N O Q ~ ~ n U . H ^ ^~ ^~ O a.+ a a~ o~ N t0 M N ^ ^ ^~ ^~ ^~ ^~ > ~ ._ L 0 ._ 0 0 0 a~ M ~i O O O O n a~ .~ L a.+ ._ D C .. i H L L 0 ._ L 0 ^ ~3 a~ ~a ~~ V O J rv .~ c a~ c a~ V .~ N L ^~ ._ U 0 N ,--i O .~ L 3 ._ .~ V O ._ 4 U .~ a~ ~V d7 d7 .~ O V ~ ~ ,__ o ~ .,.., ra ~ a~ ~3 .= L ~. ~ O ?~ ~_ ._ ~ ^- ~ V s a.+ s J 'Q Z Z F- W U N ,o O s ~V a~~ Z ~ ~ O ~ ~ I ~ A^~~ ~ . ;,' ~~~~ .y. ~ ~~ ~~ ,i ,. .~~ ~~~ ~~ C ° p° .«j M g a a t `~' E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° o ~ I ~ ~ Ui _q m o m E " o ~ m a o E c m y ro ~ ~ a~ m o ' Q~ W ~ Q m v N~; .~ v ; ~ 5 y ~ ~ v °' ~~ u 'o g V '~ ~ ~ ~ '~ o ~ _E E ~ u ~ E ~ ~ r 3 y~ ~~ y c m o ° q v '~ x ° A > Q ~ ~~ c i A ~ m v Q a c a n y c ~ D? q V a.i a O~ N H p T U C u } O = N N ~ C~~~ Y V~] Q O ' ..... ~ Q: y y E o o~= E '= 9 a o w o ~.. G~ ~ E y a ~ d ° ' E ° ° ' ~ , ~ '" ~ ° - F. ~~ ° ~ ;°. 3 ° ~ r A ~~ , ~ ~ F~1 ~ 7 n+ > o ~ a ,. ~ q Q ~ aEi ~ ~ 2 ~y 6I ~ u c o ~ Y m o E~ ~ m p E w - 0 ~ 7 ' i E 4 ~ 'v ~ 'o °m ° ~ v o ~. A~~ N Q ~ .N .. 4 E= V y p ~ W _ V ~ ~ ~ y~ c o 3 E a v ° n~ y E~ W :0 o c N v ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~~ .~ ,j1R 2 E~ v m° a g o d ,~ o f a> a~ c ~~~ '? a o E v o~ ,~ ~ U ~ ti o E c '~ m a w ~ E~~ ~T ', a.+ f0 t~ A F ~ ~ p & ~ ~p N s N m 5 m o E o E ~ " E V v E Y p E 'ro E E ~ o V 1 ~ ~, ~ N Q ^- 'V L ~ t~ ~ • ~ 0 ~ ~ ~-- ^~ W L (a ~' N C O O O L Q .~ L a--~ ~_ L lA9 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 5.A. Subject: Resolution Recognizing B&B Printing for Exemplary Environmental Stewardship County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: cJ Board Action Requested: Mr. Warren has requested adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: B&B Printing has been designated a Zero Hazardous Waste Generation Company by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality and has met the requirements to be a Certified Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator. Preparers E. Wilson Davis, Jr. Title: Director, Economic Development Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No ~~~~~s RECOGNIZING B&B PRINTING FOR EXEMPLARY ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes existing businesses within the county that contribute to the county's economy and its citizens; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County is proud to have B&B Printing as a valued member of our business community; and WHEREAS, B&B Printing has been designated a Zero Hazardous Waste Generation Company by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality; and WHEREAS, B&B Printing has met the requirements to be a Certified Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator by identifying all hazardous waste accumulated, not accumulating more than 1,000 kilograms at any time and ensuring that any hazardous waste is delivered to a person or facility who is authorized to manage it; and WHEREAS, B&B Printing has worked to refine production processes to eliminate hazardous materials used in its production process; and WHEREAS, B&B Printing is committed to environmental responsibility by initiating energy saving programs designed to reduce consumption of electricity and fuel; and WHEREAS, B&B Printing has an extensive recycling program capturing and recycling 1000 of all paper waste and recycling metal printing plates and inks; and WHEREAS, B&B Printing chooses to do business with vendors and suppliers who are responsible stewards of the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 18th day of November 2009, publicly recognizes B&B Printing for its many contributions to the county and for its exemplary environmental stewardship. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to B&B Printing and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. p€~~gJ'~`i'7 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: S.B. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing the 2009 Senior Volunteer Hall of Fame Inductees County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: ~/ The Chesterfield Senior Volunteer Hall of Fame Committee has requested that the Board recognize the 2009 induction of Mr. Charles L. T. Ellis, Mr. Patrick Shellenberg and Ms. Ruth G. Sims. Summary of Information: Mr. Charles L. T. Ellis was nominated by Ms. Barbara Micou, Communities in Schools Site Coordinator at Chesterfield Community High School. Mr. Ellis' interest and involvement with the young people at Community High School is quite significant. He serves as a role model for the students, many of whom have been unsuccessful in school in the past. He consistently promotes academic achievement and has shown the students that they can count on him to be there to cheer their successes. Mr. Ellis has been instrumental in founding and participating in the Carver High School Group, which seeks to preserve the history of the former George W. Carver High School. Mr. Ellis has volunteered at Chesterfield Community High School in support of their Student of the Month program, and serves as Chairman of the Board for the Virginia Commonwealth Baseball League. He averages 216 volunteer hours a year and he has volunteered 432 hours since the age of 65. Preparers Debbie Leidheiser Title: Chesterfield County Senior Advocate Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No #Q00~08 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Mr. Patrick Shellenberg was nominated by Shana Beverly, Volunteer Program Coordinator with Senior Connections, The Capital Area Agency on Aging. Mr. Shellenberg has the unique ability to bring joy to those who have none and to treat all people with dignity, humanity and respect. He goes out of his way to look for ways he can supply a need for someone else - a way to brighten their day and ease a heavy load. All of his volunteer services are done with kindness, grace, and humility. Mr. Shellenberg volunteers as a Senior Connections Ombudsman Volunteer, where he regularly visits residents serving as an advocate. He also volunteers with Meals on Wheels where he packs coolers for the volunteers, delivers the meals on his own route, serves as a substitute driver and volunteers at their fundraising events. In addition to these two activities, Mr. Shellenberg works as a volunteer in the Emergency Room at CJW Medical Center answering questions and directing visitors, and he makes sandwiches and desserts for the participants at Freedom House. Mr. Shellenberg averages 780 volunteer hours a year and he has volunteered 12,240 hours since the age of 65. Ms. Ruth G. Sims was nominated by Kathy Sefin, Principal at Grange Hall Elementary School. Ms. Sims is truly a kindergarten teacher at heart. She arrives at school on the first day and continues on a daily basis until the last day. She sets up the cafeteria seating for the school, monitors peanut allergy children to help keep them safe while eating in the cafeteria and assists the students with developing independence. She works as a School Library Volunteer re-shelving books, helps students locate and check out books and assists with the Fall and Spring Book Fairs. In addition, Ruth serves as a Teacher/School Volunteer by taking laminated instructional material home two evenings a week and cutting it out, which assists all 34 teachers in the school. Ms. Ruth Sims is a positive role model for all of the students and staff. Ms. Sims averages 912 volunteer hours a year and she has volunteered 5,952 hours since the age of 65. This year the Chesterfield Senior Volunteer Hall of Fame received 19 applications. These 19 individuals volunteered 16,827 hours of community service this year and they have donated over 81,420 hours since attaining the age of 65. Q®©~~~ RECOGNIZING SENIOR VOLUNTEER HALL OF FAME INDUCTEES WHEREAS, volunteering is a powerful force for the solution of human problems and the creative use of human resources is essential to a healthy, productive and humane society; and WHEREAS, our nation's heritage is based on citizen involvement and citizen participation. Volunteerism is of enormous benefit in building a better community and a better sense of one's own well being; and WHEREAS, the active involvement of citizens is needed today more than ever to combat growing human and social problems, to renew our belief that these problems can be solved and to strengthen our sense of community; and WHEREAS, volunteering offers all, young and old, the opportunity to participate in the life of their community and to link their talents and resources to address some of the major issues facing our counties, such as education, hunger, youth, and our elderly; and WHEREAS, many agencies that benefit from volunteers should show their appreciation and recognition to the many volunteers who possess many skills and talents which they generously and enthusiastically apply to a variety of community tasks, and encourage others to participate in programs as volunteers; and WHEREAS, nineteen adults in Chesterfield age 65-plus have donated 16,827 hours this year in volunteer service and 81,420 hours of volunteer service since they have attained the age of 65. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 18th day of November 2009, publicly recognizes Mr. Charles L. T. Ellis, Mr. Patrick Shellenberg and Ms. Ruth G. Sims who were inducted into the Chesterfield Senior Volunteer Hall of Fame on October 22, 2009, and expresses appreciation to these dedicated volunteers who contribute immeasurably to various programs throughout the area to strengthen our county and build bridges to the future. Q~®Q~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA », Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.A. Subiect• FY2009 Results of Operations Report County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Review of Year-end FY2009 Results of Operations as outlined below and designation of reserved funds for schools. Summary of Information: Each November, after the county's year end financial statements are completed and audited by an external auditor, staff presents a report on the county's year end financial position. As part of the report, staff makes recommendations to the Board on the year's results of operations. Those recommendations typically address designating funds to meet policy established fund balance levels, designating or appropriating funds for specific purposes, or designating funds for use in future year budgets, the details of which can be decided as that next budget is prepared. The FY2009 financial statements show that the county ended the fiscal year with favorable results. The county ended FY2009 within 2.1 percent, or $15.8 million of the $749.4 million adopted general fund budget. The results reflect expenditure savings of $28.5 million which in part offset a $12.6 million revenue shortfall. The balance of expenditure savings, $15.8 million, was reserved in accordance with the direction provided by the Board of Supervisors in June, 2009. During the first quarter of FY2009, as the county projected declining revenues, management implemented expenditure controls to help offset the projected FY2009 revenue shortfalls. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No # C~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA A significant amount of the general fund expenditure savings resulted from staff's approach to providing services. Approximately 200 vacancies remained unfilled, new and replacement capital purchases were deferred, and operating cost reductions produced county expenditure savings totaling $7.1 million. Schools had been preparing from the beginning of FY2009 for a minimum $11.5 million loss in revenue from the state and county by leaving about 230 positions unfilled as they became vacant throughout the year, reducing school and departmental operating budgets, setting aside savings from health insurance and holding a portion of fund balance. Anticipating that FY2010 as well as future years might be impacted by similar revenue losses, schools and departments continued to hold vacancies even after the $11.5 million revenue loss had been bridged. Schools were also very conservative by limiting operating funds to only critical purchases. These continued actions saved the additional $8.7 million. Looking forward to FY2010 and later, county savings from these types of actions will be difficult to duplicate. Approximately $5 million in FY2010 funding has been eliminated for nearly 80 of the 200 vacancies that provided savings in FY2009. Repeated deferrals of capital purchases for vehicles, heavy equipment and technology infrastructure will further strain existing operations - FY2010 departmental capital equipment budgets were reduced $751,000. For Schools, the FY2010 budget included budget reductions of $32 million. A number of these cuts were a continuation of actions taken in FY2009 and others were deferrals of capital purchases that cannot be replicated in the coming years. FY2010 includes a reduction of 250 positions, revisions to replacement schedules deferring the purchase of $8.7 million of buses, vehicles and textbooks, reductions to school and departmental budgets totaling more than $3.0 million, and other reductions to existing programs throughout the school division. In the past, recommendations have been made on the use of results of operations. Based on the Board's June 2009 action, all positive results of operations in excess of the FY2010 budgeted undesignated ending fund balance, totaling $15.8 million, were set aside in reserves. Staff recommends that $8.7 million of the $15.8 million be designated for school's use in future budgets, the details of which will be decided upon in upcoming budget deliberations. This would leave $7.1 million reserved and unallocated, allowing the Board the flexibility to determine the best use of these funds during the FY2011-FY2012 budget process. ~J0~~2 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.6.1. Subiect: Nominations/Appointments to the Appomattox River Water Authority Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Nominate and reappoint James J.L. Stegmaier, alternate member Roy E. Covington, Director of Appomattox River Water Authority Board. Summary of Information: County Administrator, and Utilities, to serve on the The purpose of the Appomattox River Water Authority Board is to provide treated water as needed to member jurisdictions including the Counties of Chesterfield, Dinwiddie and Prince George and the Cities of Colonial Heights and Petersburg. The current terms of Mr. Stegmaier and Mr. Covington expire November 21, 2009. The new terms will be effective November 21, 2009 and expire November 21, 2013. The Board concurs with these reappointments. Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless rules are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board. Nominees are voted on in the order nominated. Preparers Janice Blakley Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No ~., CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.6.2. Subiect: Nominations/Appointments to the South Central Wastewater Authority Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Nominate and reappoint James J.L. Stegmaier, County Administrator, and alternate member Roy E. Covington, Director of Utilities, to serve on the South Central Wastewater Authority Board. Summary of Information: The purpose of the South Central Wastewater Authority is to provide wastewater treatment services to protect and enhance the environment for the cities of Petersburg and Colonial Heights, and the counties of Chesterfield, Dinwiddie and Prince George. The current terms of Mr. Stegmaier and Mr. Covington expire November 21, 2009. The new terms will be effective November 21, 2009 and expire November 21, 2013. The Board concurs with these reappointments. Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless rules are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board. Nominees are voted on in the order nominated. Preparers __ Janice Blakley Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No 1718 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.6.3. Subject: Create Two New Memberships on the Citizen's Budget Advisory Committee (CBAC) and Nominate and Appoint Two New Members to the Committee County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Gt/ Board Action Requested: Request that the Board of Supervisors increase the number of members on the CBAC from five to seven members and nominate and appoint two new members to serve on the committee. Summary of Information: On October 8, 2008, the Board of Supervisors created the Citizen's Budget Advisory Committee comprised of five at-large members. Due to the large amount of complex work this committee has undertaken, committee members have requested that the Board of Supervisors add two more at-large persons to the committee. The appointment terms of these new members would be for two years, effective immediately and expiring on September 30, 2011. This agenda item requests that the Board appoint two new committee members. Staff recommends that the term of the appointees expire on September 30, 2011. The following individuals are recommended to serve on the Citizen's Budget Advisory Committee: Mr. Anthony Russo and Dr. James Shultz. If the members of the Board of Supervisors desire to nominate and appoint individuals to this committee at this meeting, they will need to unanimously vote to suspend the Rules of Procedure. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No °~~ f;~i ~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.C. Subject: Streetlight Installation Cost Approvals County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: This item requests Board approval of new streetlight installations in the Dale and Matoaca District. Summary of Information: Requests for streetlights, from individual citizens or civic groups, are received in the Department of Environmental Engineering. Staff requests cost quotations from Dominion Virginia Power for each request received. When the quotations are received, staff re-examines each request and presents them at the next available regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Staff provides the Board with an evaluation of each request based on the following criteria: 1. Streetlights should be located at intersections; CONTINUED NEXT PAGE Preparers Richard M. McElfish Title: Director, Environmental Engineering Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # t~4®x'.1.6 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information: (Continued) 2. There should be a minimum average of 600 vehicles per day (VPD) passing the requested location if it is an intersection or 400 VPD if the requested location is not an intersection; 3. Petitions are required and should include 75% of residents within 200 feet of the requested location and if at an intersection, a majority of those residents immediately adjacent to the intersection. Cost quotations from Dominion Virginia Power are valid for a period of 60 days. The Board, upon presentation of the cost quotation may approve, defer, or deny the expenditure of funds from available District Improvement Funds for the streetlight installation. If the expenditure is approved, staff authorizes Dominion Virginia Power to install the streetlight. A denial of a project will result in its cancellation and the District Improvement Fund will be charged the design cost shown; staff will notify the requestor of the denial. Projects cannot be deferred for more than 30 days due to quotation expiration. Quotation expiration has the same effect as a denial. DALE DISTRICT: In the Mason Woods subdivision • Mason Valley Court, vicinity of 4403 Cost to install streetlight: $2,604.79 (Design Cost: $700.00) Does not meet minimum criteria for intersection or vehicles per day MATOACA DISTRICT: In the Summerford subdivision • Intersection of Summerford Drive and Summersedge Terrace Cost to install streetlight: $4,067.84 (Design Cost: $700.00) Meets minimum criteria For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. (l ®®~'~~ STREETLIGHT REQUEST Dale District Request Received: July 29, 2009 Estimate Received: October 29, 2009 NAME OF REQUESTOR ADDRESS: REQUESTED LOCATION: Ms. Joy T. Thornton 4403 Mason Valley Court Richmond, VA 23235 Mason Valley Court, in the vicinity of 4403 Cost to install streetlight: $2,604.79 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Not Qualified Vehicles Per Day: Not Qualified Petition: Qualified Requestor Comments: Estimate Requested: July 30, 2009 Days Estimate Outstanding: 70 "We have open air drug activity at night. Six houses have been broken into near this site. There are low ditches and the road is narrow with cars parking along it. Kids use the ditch at night to sit and smoke illegal substances leaving lots of trash for residents to pick up. There have also been break-ins of three cars. High traffic by foot in this area by all ages to cut through to stores and other neighborhoods. Our District Supervisor, Mr. Holland, has been here at night and has noticed the need for lighting. Since requesting this light I have had bricks thrown through both my front window and the rear window of my car." Streetlight Request Map November 18, 2009 ~~ ~~ ~~v~ o~ ~~ MASON ~~<C y0 CIN ERttiOO OO 0~v~"PN Ro ~S'T RL tier ~QQ- Q- O~ P~ ~"~S Oti ~RF TAR This map is a copyrighted product of the Chestertield County GIS Office. Streetlight Legend r u existing light requested light N This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. Existing streetlight information was obtained from the Chestertield County Environmental Engineering Department. 420 210 0 420 Feet cls 00001 STREETLIGHT REQUEST Matoaca District Request Received: November 24, 2008 Estimate Received: October 6, 2009 Estimate Requested: November 25, 2008 Days Estimate Outstanding: 314 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Mr. Douglas Dix ADDRESS: Summerford Homeowners Association 14007 Summersedge Terrace Chesterfield, VA 23832 REQUESTED LOCATION: Intersection of Summerford Drive and Summersedge Terrace Cost to install streetlight: $4,067.84 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Qualified Vehicles Per Day: Qualified Petition: Qualified Requestor Comments: "The requested streetlight is to replace an existing light that was installed by the original developer. This light has continued to be difficult to maintain. Our association has spent considerable funds over the last several years trying to maintain the light. The light is currently not working and at this point we do not believe that we can justify additional expenditures. "Several years ago we worked with the county and Va. Power and had several Va. Power lights installed in Summerford. These have proven to be more dependable and with no maintenance cost to the association." Staff Comments: Staff notes that this location is a school bus stop serving elementary and middle school students from both the Summerford and the Woods at Summerford communities. This application is to replace a light owned by the Summerford Homeowners Association. The actual installation cost associated with this project is $8,135.68. However, the homeowners association has agreed and offered to contribute 50% of the cost of the project. This application is to request the Board of Supervisors approve funding the remaining 50% of the cost, $4,067.84. Streetlight Request Map November 18, 2009 MA--IOGANY PL • SUMMERSEDGETER v 50 ~2 O,p ~G ~~ F~ O~ O O~ This map is a copyrighted product of the Chestertield County GIS Office. Streetlight Legend existing light • requested light ~J N This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. Existing streetlight information was obtained from the Chestertield County Environmental Engineering Department. 250 125 0 250 Feet cjs CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.1. Subiect: Adoption of the 2010 Legislative Program County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adopt the 2010 Legislative Program Summary of Information: Attached is the proposed Legislative Program for the 2010 General Assembly. The items listed are those presented at the work session on October 14th. There will be a public hearing scheduled for December 16th by separate item on the proposed charter change. After the public hearing, the board will vote to add the charter change to the 2010 Legislative Program. Preparers Marv Ann Curtin Title: Director, Intergovernmental Relations Attachments: ~ Yes ~ No # ~~®~:~2 Guiding Principle Maintain AAA rating, financial independence and fiscal integrity of Chesterfield County. LEGISLATIVE REQUESTS • Amend the secondary street acceptance requirements (SSAR) to "grandfather" requests for acceptance that do not have a state maintained stub road connection due to a specific zoning requirement that was in effect prior to March 9, 2009 (the effective date of the regulations). • Amend the secondary street acceptance requirements (SSAR) to allow the acceptance of any street within a network addition that meets the public service requirement of three or more occupied units. These two transportation requests stem from the potential for unintended consequences for citizens as a result of implementation of the recent amendments to the VDOT secondary street acceptance requirements. • Request JLARC to study the costs and benefits of the Commonwealth providing financial and other incentives to localities for the joint construction of capital facilities and for the joint provision of operating services. This board request is for JLARC to identify potential areas for interlocal cooperation that could result in future financial benefits. • Amend the Charter of Chesterfield County to allow the County Administrator the same access to tax information as the Commissioner of the Revenue. Additional access to tax information will allow the county to better analyze and project revenues in a challenging fiscal environment. • Amend the Virginia Public Procurement Act to provide an exemption from the Act for the sale of dogs trained for local police work to the handler last in control of the animal. This item will clarify that local police departments have the same exemption that exists for State Police in the sale ofpolice trained dogs to their handlers. p®®~~3 LEGISLATIVE POSITIONS • Support the Jeff Davis Association's efforts to have Route 1 in Chesterfield receive a historic highway designation. • Support Richmond Regional PDC and Crater PDC with their regional legislative agendas. • Oppose additional cost shifting from the state to local governments. • Oppose any limitations/caps on existing cash proffer or land use authorities. • Oppose additional state unfunded mandates. ISSUES OF CONCERN FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS • Additional state budget reductions • Implementation of storm water regulations that could be detrimental to Chesterfield County • Transportation funding and economic development • Impact fees • State and local tax structure • State extension of tax benefits that reduce local revenues (~'®~ ~~ 4 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.2.a. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Ms. Martha H. Geisen, Department of Real Estate Assessments, Upon Her Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Ms. Martha H. Geisen, Assistant Director for the Department of Real Estate Assessments, will retire effective January 1, 2010 after 24 years of dedicated service to the citizens of Chesterfield County. Preparers Jonathan Davis Title: Director, Real Estate Assessments Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # (~~®~J~S RECOGNIZING MS. MARTHA H. GEISEN UPON HER RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Ms. Martha H. Geisen began her tenure of public service with Chesterfield County as a temporary employee in the Building Inspections Department on September 30, 1985, and was promoted to a full-time position of secretary in April 1986; and WHEREAS, in February 1987, Ms. Geisen was promoted to the position of Senior Appraiser in the Department of Real Estate Assessments, and through hard work and dedication was promoted to the position of Principal Commercial Appraiser in 1993, Senior Automation Analyst in 1994, and Assistant Director in 1997; and WHEREAS, Ms. Geisen became a member of the Virginia Association of Assessing Officers in 1987, holding the position as Historian and serving on the VAAO Board of Directors, and Awards Committee, Education Committee, and the Professional Development Advisory Committee; and WHEREAS, Ms. Geisen was licensed by the State of Virginia as a Certified General Real Estate Appraiser on August 25, 1994; and WHEREAS, Ms. Geisen received her IAAO Residential Evaluator Specialist Designation on August 27, 1990, and IAAO Certified Assessment Evaluator Designation on July 9, 1993; and WHEREAS, in her role as Assistant Director, Ms. Geisen was committed to leading by example and was a vital part of the accomplishments made in the Department of Real Estate Assessments; and WHEREAS, Ms. Geisen served on the Emergency Management Committee, the Disaster Recovery Team, and wrote the Department of Real Estate Assessment's Continuity of Operations (COOP) plan; and WHEREAS, Ms. Geisen has been a dedicated and faithful employee of the County of Chesterfield for 24 years; and WHEREAS, Ms. Geisen will be missed by her staff and peers for her expertise in the property assessment field as well as her commitment in maintaining a positive and professional attitude; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding contributions of Ms. Martha H. Geisen, expresses appreciation on behalf of all residents for her service to the county, congratulations upon her retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. ~~fl~ ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ` - BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 '„• ~ AGENDA Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.2.b. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Mr. Phillip Thorpe Upon His Retirement November 1, 2009 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Mr. Phillip Thorpe retired on November 1, 2009, after more than 21 years of service to the Chesterfield County Utilities Department. Preparers Roy Covington Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director, Utilities Department No Q0002'7 RECOGNIZING MR. PHILLIP THORPE UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mr. Phillip Thorpe retired from Chesterfield County Utilities Department on November 1, 2009; and WHEREAS, Mr. Thorpe began his public service with Chesterfield County on May 31, 1988, as a Senior County Maintenance Worker in the Utilities Department, and was later promoted to a Utility Plant Mechanic where he served faithfully until his retirement; and WHEREAS, from 1988 to 2009, Mr. Thorpe maintained and operated water pumping and storage facilities, and equipment essential to the distribution of clean drinking water to Chesterfield County's public water system; and WHEREAS, Mr. Thorpe was focused on providing world-class customer service by consistently meeting or exceeding customer expectations; and WHEREAS, Mr. Thorpe continuously utilized his knowledge and experience to provide water service that is safe, reliable and environmentally sound; and WHEREAS, Mr. Thorpe was highly respected by his peers and coworkers; and WHEREAS, Mr. Thorpe willingly and faithfully worked endless hours during emergencies and after hours to ensure continued service to Chesterfield County's public water system customers; and WHEREAS, throughout his career with Chesterfield County, Mr. Thorpe displayed leadership, aptitude, good character and sound values. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. Phillip Thorpe and extends on behalf of its members and citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation for more than 21 years of exceptional service to the county. ~~®~~~ ,~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.2.c. Subtect: Recognizing Mr. Thomas Clay, Collections Division of Waste and Resource Recovery, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: W Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff requests the Board adopt the attached resolution recognizing Thomas Clay for 30 years of dedicated service to Chesterfield County. Preparers Robert C. Key Title: Director of General Services Attachments: ^ yes . No #000029 RECOGNIZING MR. THOMAS CLAY UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mr. Thomas Clay retired on October, 30, 2009 from the Department of General Services, Division of Waste and Resource Recovery, after providing thirty years of dedicated and faithful service to Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Mr. Clay began his service in 1979 collecting refuse for the Chesterfield County Department of General Services; and WHEREAS, Mr. Clay has helped the county's Sanitation Division evolve into the Division of Solid Waste, and then the Division of Waste and Resource Recovery, reflecting a focus on protection of the environment; and WHEREAS, Mr. Clay is known for his friendly, easy going manner; his ability to work with citizens in an effective way; his caring for his fellow co-workers; and performance of his duties in a most professional manner; and HEREAS, Mr. Clay provided the wisdom of his years and experience in contributing to the division's strategic planning conferences, process action teams, and other activities; and WHEREAS, Mr. Clay always performed his duties and responsibilities in an excellent manner placing the welfare and safety of co-workers, other county employees, and the public above his own personal comfort and feelings, and will be missed by his fellow co-workers. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. Thomas Clay and extends appreciation for his thirty years of dedicated service to the county, congratulations, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. ~~~®~~ ,~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.2.d. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Mr. Alexander Joseph Clark Upon Attaining the Rank of Eagle Scout County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: G/ Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff has received a request for the Board to adopt a resolution recognizing Mr. Alexander Joseph Clark, Troop 2837, sponsored by Chester Baptist Church, upon attaining the rank of Eagle Scout. Mr. Clark is a resident of the Bermuda District. Ms. Jaeckle will present the resolution at Mr. Clark's Court of Honor ceremony. Preparers Janice Blakley Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Clerk to the Board ^ No 000031 RECOGNIZING MR. ALEXANDER JOSEPH CLARK UPON ATTAINING THE RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered by Congress in 1916; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build character, provide citizenship training and promote physical fitness; and WHEREAS, after variety of skills serving in a leade project beneficial demonstrating Scout and earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide including leadership, service and outdoor life, rship position in a troop, carrying out a service to his community, being active in the troop, spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; WHEREAS, Mr. Alexander Joseph Clark, Troop 2837, sponsored by Chester Baptist Church, has accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout, which is earned by only four percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and endeavoring to prepare himself for a role as a leader in society, Alexander has distinguished himself as a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. Alexander Joseph Clark, extends congratulations on his attainment of Eagle Scout, and acknowledges the good fortune of the county to have such an outstanding young man as one of its citizens. ,~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.2.e. Subject: Resolution Recognizing November 2009, Month" in Chesterfield County County Administrator's Comments: as "Pancreatic Cancer Awareness County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Ms. Durfee requested that the Board adopt a resolution recognizing November 2009, as "Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month." Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States, with the lowest survival rate of any major cancer. Preparers Janice Blakley Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Clerk to the Board ^ No 00033 RECOGNIZING NOVEMBER 2009, AS "PANCREATIC CANCER AWARENESS MONTH" IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY WHEREAS, over 42,000 people will be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer this year in the United States and over 35,000 will die from the disease; and WHEREAS, pancreatic cancer is the deadliest cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States; and WHEREAS, approximately 880 deaths will occur in the Commonwealth of Virginia; and WHEREAS, 76 percent of pancreatic cancer patients die within the first year of their diagnosis and 95 percent of pancreatic cancer patients die within the first five years; and WHEREAS, there is no cure for pancreatic cancer and there have been no significant improvements in early detection, treatment methods, or survival rates in the last 30 years; and WHEREAS, when symptoms of pancreatic cancer present themselves, it is usually too late for an optimistic prognosis, and the average life expectancy of those diagnosed with metastasis disease is only three to six months; and WHEREAS, incidence of pancreatic cancer is approximately 50 percent higher in African Americans than in other ethnic groups; and WHEREAS, the federal government invests less money in pancreatic cancer research than it does in any of the other leading cancer killers; and WHEREAS, the good health and well-being of the residents of Chesterfield County are enhanced as a direct result of increased awareness about pancreatic cancer and research into early detection, causes, and effective treatments; and WHEREAS, the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network is the first and only national patient advocacy organization that serves the pancreatic cancer community in Chesterfield County, in the Commonwealth of Virginia and nationwide by focusing its efforts on public policy, research funding, patient services, and public awareness and education related to developing effective treatments and a cure for pancreatic cancer; and WHEREAS, the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network and its affiliates in Chesterfield County and the Commonwealth of Virginia support those patients currently battling pancreatic cancer and are committed to nothing less than a cure. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the month of November 2009, as "Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month" in Chesterfield County and calls this recognition to the attention of all its citizens. ,~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.3.a. Subject: Set a Public Hearing to Consider Approval of a Lease-Purchase Agreement with Chesterfield Alternatives, Inc. for a Build-A-House Project Located on Property Adjacent to Meadowbrook High School County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: i~~~~/ G/ Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to set a public hearing for December 2, 2009, to consider approval of a lease-purchase agreement with Chesterfield Alternatives, Inc. for a Build-A-House Project located on property adjacent to Meadowbrook High School. Summary of Information: The Build-A-House Project is a cooperative project through which students at the Chesterfield Technical Center construct a house on vacant county-owned land, with construction expenses being funded by Chesterfield Alternatives, Inc. Once construction is completed, the house will be used by the Chesterfield Community Services Board to provide services to its elderly or disabled consumers. Last year, the Board initiated the Build-A-House project with property located at 19300 Church Road in the Matoaca District. Construction of that home is expected to be completed in June 2010. Staff is seeking to continue the Build-A-House project by beginning construction of another home on a 1.241 acre unimproved parcel owned by the county adjacent to Meadowbrook High School in the Dale District (the "Property"). Preparers Deborah Burcham Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Executive Director, Community Services Board (82303.1) No # (~®®~-~5 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of3 AGENDA Chesterfield Alternatives, Inc. is a non-profit organization whose mission is to support the work of the Chesterfield Community Services Board. For more than twenty years, Chesterfield Alternatives has bought or leased houses which the Community Services Board operates as adult group homes. The Board is being asked to consider the approval of a lease-purchase agreement for the Property. Pursuant to the lease-purchase agreement, the county would lease the Property to Chesterfield Alternatives, Inc. during the period of the construction of the house and provide Chesterfield Alternatives an opportunity to purchase the Property when the construction is completed. The execution of a lease-purchase agreement will facilitate Chesterfield Alternatives in obtaining financing for the project. The lease-purchase agreement does not require Chesterfield Alternatives to make payments to the county, but instead requires Chesterfield Alternatives to make a financial investment in the project by funding the construction expenses. The construction expenses are estimated to be as much as $234,606. The current value of the Property is estimated to be $34,000. After the home is constructed, Chesterfield Alternatives will be able to purchase the Property from the county for a nominal amount. The deed transferring the Property will prevent Chesterfield Alternatives from reconveying the Property without the approval of the county, and will require that the Property be used to provide services to consumers of the Community Services Board. The Community Services Board intends to lease the house to operate an adult group home. Technical Center students are available to begin construction activities as soon as practicable. ~~~0~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 179 AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Budget and Manactement Comments: The Board is requested to set a public hearing for December 2, 2009, to consider approval of a lease-purchase agreement with Chesterfield Alternatives, Inc. (CAI) for a Build-A-House Project located on property adjacent to Meadowbrook High School. With the approval of this lease-purchase agreement, the county would allow CAI to build an adult group home on county owned property. CAI would pay for the construction costs and the labor would be provided by students from the Technical Center. After the home is constructed, the county would allow CAI to purchase the property for a nominal amount. The adults who would move into this house are currently residents of one of the Community Services Board's (CSB) group homes, so the building of this new home would not increase the services of the CSB. However, the costs for providing these services would decrease with the opening of the new home, as the current group home is a rental property for which the CSB is paying market rental rates. Those rental costs would be eliminated with this new home, but staffing and other operational costs would remain the same. Building this house would also improve the living environment of the group home's residents. The new home will be built taking the special needs of the residents into account, whereas the current home these consumers inhabit is less accessible. This lease agreement and partnership does not require county funds to be used for the construction of the building. Although adult group homes continue to be a high priority for the CSB, should funding not be available for the continued operation of this home, CAI would be able to sell or contract out the use of this home as there is a great need for group home services in the community. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management Q0~~1~'~ LEASE AND PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS LEASE AND PURCHASE AGREEMENT, dated NOVEMBER , 2009, by and between THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia (LESSOR) and CHESTERFIELD ALTERNATIVES, INC., a Virginia non-stock corporation (LESSEE). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, LESSOR is the owner of certain real property located in DALE District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, 1.241 acres of unimproved land located on Coghill Road adjacent to Meadowbrook High School, in the County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the "Property" shown and described on Exhibit A); and WHEREAS, LESSEE is anot-for-profit corporation that was incorporated in 1986 to complement the programs of the Chesterfield Community Services Board; and WHEREAS, for twenty years, LESSEE has bought or leased houses in the County which it then leases to the Chesterfield Community Services Board ("CSB") to use as adult group homes for elderly and/or disabled consumers of the CSB; and WHEREAS, LESSEE is partnering with the Chesterfield County School Board to provide home construction experience and training for Chesterfield County students engaged in vocational training at the Chesterfield Technical Center (the "Technical Center"); and WHEREAS, LESSEE is willing to provide funding for building materials, plans and services for the construction of a house which would be built by students as part of their curriculum through the Technical Center and under the supervision of teachers and staff of the Technical Center; and (~®~~~8 2723:82303.1 1 WHEREAS, LESSEE desires to lease from LESSOR the Property for the purpose of permitting the Technical Center vocational students to construct a house which would thereafter be leased to the CSB to provide services to consumers of the CSB; and WHEREAS, in consideration for its financial contributions in the construction of the house, LESSOR would, after completion of the construction of the house, transfer ownership of the Property and its improvements to LESSEE for a nominal purchase price and subject to the restriction that the LESSEE continue to make it available to the CSB for use by its consumers; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors held on December 2009, a resolution was duly adopted approving this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and conditions set forth herein, the sufficiency and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Property. LESSOR hereby leases to LESSEE, for the consideration of one ($1.00) dollar annually, the Property located in Chesterfield County, Virginia, as more particularly shown and described in Exhibit A. 2. Term. The term of this lease shall commence on December 2, 2009 and continue for ten (10) years or until the fee simple interest in the Property is transferred to the LESSEE as provided for herein. 3. Improvements. All Improvements constructed on the Property shall be at LESSEE'S sole cost and expense. LESSEE must obtain and maintain all certificates, permits, licenses and other approvals required by any federal, state or local authority for construction and use of the proposed Improvements and construct the Improvements in 2723:82303.1 2 ~ ®©~ `~~ accordance with all laws, regulations, ordinances or codes of applicable federal, state and local authorities. All material furnished by the LESSEE for the construction of the Improvements shall become the property of the LESSOR. 4. Testin . LESSEE shall have the right to perform and obtain, at its sole cost and expense, soil borings, percolation tests, engineering procedures, environmental investigation or other tests or reports on, over and under the Property 5. Assignment. LESSEE shall not assign this lease or sublet the Property or any portion thereof without prior written approval of LESSOR. 6. Right of Entrv. LESSOR shall have the right to enter upon the property at any time for the purpose of making inspections and to ensure compliance with the terms of this Lease. 7. Indemnification. LESSEE agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the LESSOR from any and all losses, expenses or damages of every kind, nature or description arising under or related in any way to this Lease or any work pursuant to it. 8. Insurance. LESSEE shall maintain workers' compensation insurance in the statutorily required amount which insures its employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors from workers' compensation claims. LESSEE shall also maintain general liability insurance in an amount acceptable to the LESSOR'S Risk Manager during the term of this Lease and any renewals. LESSEE shall furnish the LESSOR a certificate of such insurance with a company acceptable to the LESSOR, which certificate shall designate the LESSOR as additional insured and require the insurer to provide the LESSOR with thirty (30) days advance written notice in the event of any change, non- renewal or cancellation of the insurance. (~~®©~~ 2723:82303.1 3 9. Third Parties. LESSEE shall require its contractors and subcontractors to carry workers' compensation insurance and adequate liability insurance in conformity with the minimum requirements listed above. 10. Risk of Loss; Limitation of Liability. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, LESSEE shall bear the risk of loss of or damage to the Improvements during construction and the term of this Lease. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, LESSOR shall not be liable for any consequential or incidental damages incurred by LESSEE due to any malfunction, vandalism, acts of God (including, without limitation, lightning, wind, rain, hail, fire or storms) or any other damage resulting from any reason. In no event shall the leasehold or other interest created hereby be specifically enforceable and in no event shall either party be responsible to the other for any consequential, special or incidental damages. 11. Default. If LESSEE defaults on any term of this Lease and fails to correct the default within thirty (30) days of the LESSOR'S written notice to LESSEE, this Agreement shall be terminated. The LESSOR may pursue any and all legal remedies to recover any damage, loss, cost or exposure sustained by it as a result of the default or the termination of this Lease. 12. Liens. LESSEE shall keep the Property and the Improvements free from any liens arising from any work performed, materials furnished or obligations incurred by or at the request of LESSEE. All persons either contracting with LESSEE or furnishing or rendering labor and materials to LESSEE shall be notified in writing by LESSEE that they must look only to LESSEE for payment for any labor or materials. If any lien is filed against LESSOR'S property or the Improvements as a result of any acts or 2723:82303.1 4 ~ ~ ~ ~~~ omissions of LESSEE, its employees, agents or contractors, LESSEE shall discharge it within fifteen (15) days after LESSEE learns that the lien has been filed. 13. Purchase Option. (a) Upon completion of the construction of the Improvements on the Property, the LESSEE shall have the right to purchase the Property from LESSOR for the purchase price of ten ($10.00) dollars so long as LESSEE can document its investment of at least $100,000 in the construction of the Improvements on the Property. LESSEE shall exercise its purchase right through written notice to LESSOR together with submission of the documentation of its investment in the Improvements. Sale of the property pursuant to the option shall be contingent upon the approval of the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors after a public hearing. The Board's approval may be granted, denied or conditioned at its discretion. Closing shall occur as soon as practicable after approval. (b) The deed transferring the Property to LESSEE shall be subject to two conditions subsequent with automatic rights of reversion: (i) LESSEE/GRANTEE cannot convey the Property without prior written approval of LESSOR/GRANTOR and (ii) LESSEE/GRANTEE is prohibited from discontinuing the use of the Property to provide services to the consumers of the CSB. 14. Notices. All notices due hereunder shall be deemed validly given if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, or with a nationally recognized courier which provides notice of receipt, postage prepaid, addressed as follows or to such other addresses as may be given from either party in writing to the other: ~~®x'42 2723:82303.1 5 Lessor: Right of Way Manager County of Chesterfield P. O. Box 608 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 with copies to: Community Services Board Executive Director P. O. BOX 92 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 County Attorney P. O. Box 40 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 County Administrator P. O. Box 40 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Lessee: Chesterfield Alternatives, Inc. P. O. Box 281 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 15. Entire Agreement. This writing constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between LESSOR and LESSEE and any modification hereof must, in order to be effective, be in writing, signed by authorized representatives of each party. 16. Governing Law and Venue. This Lease and performance hereunder shall be governed, interpreted, construed and regulated by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. A dispute arising under this Lease which cannot be resolved in a non judicial proceeding must be resolved in the Circuit Court, Chesterfield County, Virginia, and in no other forum. 17. Authorizations. LESSEE hereby represents and warrants to LESSOR that all necessary corporate authorizations required for execution and performance of this Lease have been given and that the undersigned officer is duly authorized to execute this 2723:82303.1 6 (~ ~ ~ ~,,~ ~,~ Lease and bind LESSEE for this it signs. LESSOR warrants that LESSOR is seized of good and marketable title to the Property and has the full power and authority to enter into and execute this Agreement. 18. Severability. If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this Lease or any application hereof shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Lease shall not be affected thereby, and shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 19. Counterparts. This Lease may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute but one instrument. CHESTERFIELD ALTERNATIVES, INC. BY: (PRESIDENT/VICE PRESIDENT) Commonwealth of Virginia, City/County of , to-wit: I, a Notary Public in and for the City/County and Commonwealth aforesaid, do hereby certify that this day personally appeared before me in my jurisdiction aforesaid, (PRESIDENT/VICE PRESIDENT) of CHESTERFIELD ALTERNATIVES, INC. whose name is signed to the foregoing writing dated October , 2009 and acknowledged the same before me. Given under my hand , 2009. My commission expires: My registration number: NOTARY PUBLIC 2723:82303.1 7 (ji'~ ®®'~4 ATTEST: JAMES J. L. STEGMAIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY Commonwealth of Virginia, County of Chesterfield, to-wit: COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA BY: ARTHUR S. WARREN, CHAIRMAN BOARD OF SUPERVISORS I, , a Notary Public in and for the County and Commonwealth aforesaid, do hereby certify that this day personally appeared before me in my jurisdiction aforesaid ARTHUR S. WARREN, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, whose name is signed to the foregoing writing dated 2009, and acknowledged the same before me. Given under my hand My commission expires: My registration number: 2009. NOTARY PUBLIC Commonwealth of Virginia, County of Chesterfield, to-wit: I, , a Notary Public in and for the County and Commonwealth aforesaid, do hereby certify that this day personally appeared before me in my jurisdiction aforesaid JAMES J. L. STEGMAIER, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, whose name is signed to the foregoing writing dated 2009, and acknowledged the same before me. Given under my hand , 2009. My commission expires: My registration number: NOTARY PUBLIC Q~~~~~ 2723:82303.1 8 • ! TIMMONS GROUP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. Situated, lying and being all that certain piece or parcel of land located in the Dale District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a point located on the eastern right of way line of Howell Drive and the southern right of way line of Cogbill Road, thence along said right of way line of Cogbill Road in a northeastern direction a distance of 451.08 feet to a point, said point being the True Point and Place of Beginning, thence North 54 degrees 18 minutes 08 seconds East a distance of 131.55 feet to a point, thence leaving said right of way line of Cogbill Road along a curve to the right having a radius of 25.00 feet, a length of 38.62 feet, an interior angle of 88 degrees 30 minutes 24 seconds, a chord bearing of South 81 degrees 26 minutes 40 seconds East, a chord distance of 34.89 feet to a point, thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 577.72 feet, a length of 144.27 feet, an interior angle of 14 degrees 18 minutes 27 seconds, a chord bearing of South 44 degrees 20 minutes 41 seconds East, a chord distance of 143.89 feet to a point, thence South 51 degrees 29 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 127.50 feet to a point, thence South 15 degrees 20 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 90.26 feet to a rod found, thence South 54 degrees 37 minutes 10 seconds West a distance of 104.70 feet to a rod found, thence North 18 degrees 42 minutes 19 seconds West a distance of 3.31 feet to a rod found, thence North 49 degrees 28 minutes 13 seconds West a distance of 168.52 feet to a point, thence North 46 degrees 01 minutes 52 seconds West a distance of 209.89 feet to a point, said point being the True Point and Place of Beginning, and containing 1.241 Acres of land more or less. ~~~l~~V n M N d o, 0 ~, V C a` m .N 0 U 0 N S Z W 3 Z 0 2 Q Z ~_ E °u N 0 E E 3 0 v 0 m a 0 W S' L F d e e v N C d E a 0 v v 0 ~ 83 COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD ~ 16' EASEMENT I n GPIN: 777683374700000 FOR ROAD ~ v ~ 5135 COGBI ~ LL ROAD (NOT IMPROVED) ~ °o ~ m - - D_B. 3268, PG. 47 - S 13°59'44" E - - - - - - - - --- N c~ ~ ~ - o ------- -741.61'---- --, j - ~ p _ ~ to °D~rnm -' w~ao D / ~ C 7o'~ ~O ~' /i' m ~ `~ mPm aoD ~ TS i ~~ OZ o NI pr~0 ~m zDi ~~'~ Z / ~m ~'`fOAOO n ... O ~ ~~ .m '~ ~~ ~" n ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ u~i ~ dWi D 0 0 .~ ~ ~ i' ' S Z ° m p~ m c m v DO ~ ' ~~289.43' m ----- ~ -- - o ° o. °- __ ~ N 15°32'49" W 3 ~' ,o °o ~~----~ q r i'/ v 'I '- m N ~ N J1 ~\~ ~ / ~ ~ioOD ~ __ mm~ ~-~ ~ - -- rn rn ~' A I O-I O ~v2 r v ° {a scm ~ __ r --~- % m mC G7 _ Z D 1I d y ~~ p ~ <V, _- / ' ~' D~ A`' v ~ / // m ~ ~ ~1 ~~/ / `u^ I\ N O ~ m = n '.' \ / ~ z ~ ~ ~ ' ~ N ~ V ~ !N m °O° D ~Wr W~~m 'I O ~ N i~ < O ~ ~ ( m~ j / ~vm ~ a°wAr mrnT ~Ta G I \ -~--- y-~--~i / v ~ z :U O \ ~ (~j ~ OOi m o00 7C G fA ~ I m RI d ~ \ ~ 9~ ~ S W O ~ W O v m D ut ~~ '~ ~ ~ O rn~~ I\ p n~ Z m ~° D g~ rn~ o ~ O o~ i Z o 3 a ~ y y \ ~ ~~~ w a' ~ ~ w O m' ~ i W es" p 2 O] V (~ ' m -u'~v mD ^ ~ ~ O °o Z I m O o47 Z w T~ rn o ~ Oq, ~ v ~ „ ~ I \ VO~~~ i ~~ O~~Zn '?~ ~ g wa'm Z ~ 0 0. ~r~~0 o my m ' z p m f~ O ~ ~ o y ' ~c i o~ I \ ~rNZO o // ~ J ~A ~ ~ co y ~ ~ o- Sm °om - W I ~ m y ~p0~ __ ~ m \ /voo o ~ .~2 me LSm , D ~/ mn m m ~ E r \ x..< m O T I ', ' ~ (p y da ~ _ _ oiaa3°1~•~c~m~ moSaSym aT~ y Daa3mo. a~ y as-m m nom .d v;AS.o3pmm3•QO`Did4>>oyovi~r m ' ' ' ' ya 703.3~~mmc ~ o.3 ~pc 1 '<c» 11 S»f° c85i ~» c° $c N d1 4 O y 3 W m ~~ d ~ O ~~~ N~ m 7~ y ~ >• (n y ~ y y m n d d~ O n ~ p ~ d 0 ~ 7 0 f N ~, N H N G O) O Q c~ N~? 1"" O O W m O• a N n .~ o a ~ y d d 3 O ofO3ddo~am ~, N Q N f~ 73~D~~otn ~°°`°- mS~.3 .-~ o dm 0 3d ' ' m oc ~ a3 .~~3~a ~ m 3 m y s '~ 7m ~~ m co~$3dm$ ~~ ^S o 1 ~ ~~ c > > m Q o 3 o~ m ~ 7 y 3 c N ~j d .O. N d 'a .mi a d y ~ O. W O y fD n 7. a y O. N O O. ~ N N C O d 2 m y d ~ an d ~' 7 0 JC N d m j C . ~ f» d 01 O m y y a m d d W 0 O?~ ~~ A O_ L N G 3 V OI .Z ry y .~ 3 O 7 p y ~ F f0 7 7 n .my. N p O. O d `G y i d ~ d~ 77 d O y d N ~ ~Cp. = O n ~ C V a /Y p ~ N O a ~ p >- ~ ~ Ol O ~ t. f0 N w p~ O m i OI O. ~ ~ .`I ~ N ~j /}^~ N u y 'te.,'• ~ ~ (n d" ~ (p ~ N• ~. `G ~~ 7~ O. t0 ( ~ a y y j d C H Ut Q O V fD d O O N• N O a ?~ y .~S-' '~ ~ yfd ~ C a d ~ ~ <~ ~'~~Oy aN ~'O ~.O~m O fD O ~ '~~ ~"~ < m~' ~ y 'N dy $~ a3 ~ m ~ A O' _ ? d ~ 8 y fo ?, m a ."»3c~m • m ~ OT d > > d t) y ~ O~ A d m a ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ o ? d m ~ N C1 ~ Ct) ~ y ~ o ~ N ~ mw d o ao.~? v m ^? ~ a m d ~ _ ~ j _vO +(` ~ ~~ y~ d j pA 3 7 m~ N a~ W O N ~~~ a ' ' ~ a V ~, ~ 7 g C p d O ~ OD ~ ? ~ ~ d m ~. ~ V y m ~ ~ ^m d} n 9 ' ' vai'ao ~m ~o~a j3.~a~~~ ao.~.fO~: '~ j tC z N A `G ~ - •i~. C' ~ "r ~ A O lD O m ~ 7 f0 > > fn ' ~ ~ O) O O N E C O m S i a N ^' ~ m r 3 ~ 7 O d~ d •t N (a ~_ Of C1 o d ~ C ~ ~ ocadN~3' ,am_ m~ a~ g ° `~~ m rn om o A m ~~ ., Cn pr ~" ~..Z~~y ~ yA $ o ~ j b m ~G Q O ~ "~ ~~' ~ ~ ~ O N~ A O raj' v 0 A 7 d >. an d O~ O Q 0 ~ A~ v~ Vltil~ ~a$~3y~o'''°g~y~~a~~°o m Nni~m 0 a ~~~ ~ ~d ' m ~ ~ fo.~ ,fin ~ V p D pp v m f ~ ~ ? y n o y <» Z O ... d= n ~ ~ c O N O ~O W N m y 0 A i O O 1 D r r m m d d t A f O t0 a d ~, ~ S F ~ Z y arnN~o NN m an d N m O ~~ d~~ ~ C~ ~ O L "m ~ M ~ v Or a 2 C/1 Vl O ~~ v ~ ?~ m ~ m T n N o rn W a m AT~~a c7 n ~ n n ~ M o D Z ~ _ mD ~ ~ G av{is c'vZ ~~Z O~~Z N~Z ~ O ~ . 0 ~ . O , - ~ cn~Z v V'vz v ~ . ~ m m O N ~ ~ Z Z ~ ~ f•RIZ O ° O O 0 ~ 0 O ~"u' m Z D ~ (/Ic~ Z F ~ G Z = „p°' ~ Oa ~O°' ^ ~~~ 2~ Gl w 2~ ~ ~ w 2 ~ ~ ~ 2~ - W ~~ ~Ow ~ w , 2. ~ W w S~ ~ 7C N T ~ O ~~ OO RI ~~ c r N SJr N~ r W . p ~ ~ ~ fir mj D ~ O p G7 fn G7 Cpl G7r CA A G7r y .' A ~ 2 m ' b R~ ' ~ o A O ~ ~ m O ~ A OOm ~pom ODpO.-0 W OO m oDap rnDooT o'~oT wDoT fOi~OO m W pO.ZI wDoo~ °'~oT 0 .Zl t00 t - O 30°o Z CZ n vom ~OOm om vo- ° moo- °om ° 2w w~G = 0 ro ~ r O ~ O T I M M O N S G RO V P .•••;-~ ~.~„~~~ ~~"a~. nits oiuvnrw ra®~rteo nr nee °~~.~~a ,~~°~.Z~ ,.~~ Slh DavelopmeM Ra~l darrtlal 1Mnstrvt[uro 7echnoloyy ~ rn ~ri+ a cri nri r r Z m y ~ Z Z Z Z Vl r cn ~ ~+' ' rn m oo ~" m m O N ° ~ O N O A°" W D ~ W t 0 Ui O O ) - _ ~! 77 Z o u, ao N tv f0 O p W m m m m ~ ~ ~ ~ O ° N r pAi a 0 o Of m W O A E o ~ O ~ D O O m c p N O ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T r A O m v ~ ~ w ~ G7 ~ O ~ ~ ~ = o ~ m ~ O m ~ ~ m D r m Or m v n ~ D ~ m p 0 m ~ a 3 0 r m O Z O W D ~./ ~ ~~ 1T18 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.3.b. Subject: Set a Public Hearing Date to Consider (i) Modifications to the Walthall Primary Enterprise Zone Boundary and the Midlothian Subzone #2; and (ii) Amending County Code Section 6-5 Related to Tax Relief in the Enterprise Zones and subzones County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Set a public hearing date for December 16, 2009. Summary of Information: The Commonwealth of Virginia's Enterprise Zone Program permits a jurisdiction to amend its Local Enterprise Zone Program once annually. Amendments may include boundary adjustments or modifications to the local benefits offered in the zone. The program enables the creation of up to two "subzones" per designated Enterprise Zone as long as the total acreage of the primary zone and subzones do not exceed a maximum of 3,840 acres. Effective July O1, 2005, changes to the State program eliminated the need for zones to contain a certain percentage of low-moderate income residential properties, allowing for a reallocation of acreage to non-residential parcels. The new program also changed the eligibility requirements for a locality to receive a zone designation. As such, Chesterfield County is not likely to qualify for zone designation once the two current zones expire December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2015. Therefore, in order for the County to maximize the economic impact of the zone designations for the remaining years, staff proposes to make additional amendments to the local incentive program, and to modify the Walthall Enterprise Zone boundaries, as outlined below. Preparers E. Wilson Davis Title: Director, Economic Development Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA Walthall Zone: Amend the existing zone boundaries by (i) adding 118 acres to the primary Walthall zone to include properties located on Jefferson Davis Highway, West Hundred Road, weir Road and Briggs Road. (ii)Amend the existing Midlothian Subzone #2, part of the primary Walthall zone, by adding 144 acres to include properties located on Midlothian Turnpike, Cloverleaf Drive, Starview Lane, Granite Spring Road, Ruthers Road, Turner Road, S. Providence Road and Gateway Centre Parkway. Staff also recommends revisions to the local incentives for Business Professional, Occupational License Tax (BPOL) available in the Enterprise zones and subzones. The BPOL amendment will further clarify the eligibility requirement for businesses to receive this benefit. Specifically, if the business relocates within any enterprise zone or subzone in Chesterfield County to a building or tenant space after the date on which the enterprise zone or subzone is established, it shall qualify for tax and fee relief immediately upon occupying the building provided it has not received tax or fee relief at its previous zone or subzone location. ~~®®~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS "' AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Budget and Management Comments: The expansion of the enterprise zone boundaries includes the potential for additional businesses to receive the various enterprise zone incentives that already exist, the extent of which can vary greatly depending on the project. The clarification of the Business, Professional, and Occupational License (BPOL) language will not result in the creation of any additional incentives. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 6-5 RELATING TO TAX AND FEE RELIEF FOR QUALIFIED BUSINESSES LOCATED IN AN ENTERPRISE ZONE OR SUBZONE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 6-S of the Code of the Count~o Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 6-5. Tax and fee relief for qualified businesses located in an enterprise zone or subzone. (a) Any business required to obtain a license based on gross receipts or purchases pursuant to this chapter, which is located in or makes improvements to a building within an enterprise zone or subzone designated by the state, on or after the date on which the enterprise zone or subzone was established, may receive relief during the tax and fee relief period, of those taxes and fees which are calculated on the increase in gross receipts or purchases over the business' gross receipts or purchases during the base year. The base year under this section shall be the calendar year immediately preceding the year that the business initially qualifies for tax and fee relief under this section. For taxpayers who file federal income tax returns on a fiscal year basis, the base year shall be the fiscal year ending during the calendar year immediately preceding the year that the business initially qualifies for tax and fee relief under this section. For a newly established business, a new branch or a business relocating from outside Chesterfield County, the base year amount shall be zero and the tax and fee relief period shall begin in the tax year that the business qualifies for tax and fee relief and shall last for four additional tax years, or for as long as the business remains within any enterprise zone or subzone in Chesterfield County, whichever period is shorter. For existing businesses which are already located in Chesterfield County, the tax and fee relief period shall begin in the tax year after the business qualifies for the relief and shall last for four additional tax years, or for so long as the business remains within any enterprise zone or subzone in Chesterfield County, whichever period is shorter. (b) A business shall qualify for the tax and fee relief provided for in subsection (a) as follows: (1) An application for tax relief under this section must be submitted to the county's economic development department and the benefit accessed by the business within one year of start of operations in the zone or subzone. (2) If the business newly locates from outside any enterprise zone or subzone in Chesterfield County to a building or tenant space within any enterprise zone or subzone in Chesterfield County after the date on which the enterprise zone or 0425: 82451.1 ~ ~ ®~ ~ ~' subzone is established, it shall qualify for tax and fee relief immediately upon occupying the building. If the business relocates within any entemrise zone or subzone in Chesterfield County to a buildin~or tenant space after the date on which the enterprise zone or subzone is established, it shall qualify for tax and fee relief immediately upon occupying the building provided it has not received tax or fee relief at its previous zone or subzone location. (~}~ If the business builds a new building which receives its certificate of occupancy after the date on which the enterprise zone or subzone is established, it shall qualify for the tax and fee relief immediately upon occupying the building. {43~5,~ If the business shares occupancy of a new building which receives its certificate of occupancy after the date on which the enterprise zone or subzone is established and is a separate and distinct business from any other business which occupies the same building, it shall qualify for tax and fee relief immediately upon occupying the building. (~~6,~ For purposes of determining initial eligibility for tax and fee relief under this section, the term "locate" does not include a transfer of ownership of an existing business operation within an enterprise zone or subzone to another entity which is wholly or partially owned or controlled by or affiliated with the prior business owner, but such a transfer of ownership shall not disqualify a currently eligible business from enjoying the benefits under this section for a full five years, even if such transfer occurs during the five-year eligibility period, regardless of the change in ownership. ~}~ Each business shall be limited to one five-year period of the tax and fee relief under this section. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 0425:82451.1 ~ ®~ ~ ~ ~ n a c c H ~_ t ~..i Q C~_ G 1 N r.~ d C Q C 7 O 00 N H ~L a a~ ~-+ C t ,~ ,~ e ~~ ~~~ ~' ~ O !7° ~ o d U7 ~ ,..,~ /~_OL O o d. c 0 . b PO a a A ~ ~ m o' i.§.. ® ~ t.jp~ ~i~F •o b o P,., ~ 0 ~~ .~ i t gg P~ , ~ .~ ~{~~ ~ i9 ~~ , • a ' ~ ~ i ~ f; {~~; 3 e9~ o~oos~ N V L Q .~ N a 0 L a 0 0 N C C Q L M0 W M M C O N N ~L a L ~1 W t0 t •.+ ~~F1' ;J .3 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.3.c. Subject: Set Public Hearing to Consider an Amendment to Section 19-514(d)(1)of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as Amended, Pertaining to Gravel Surface Treatment for Parking Areas Accommodating Storage of Recreational Vehicles County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Board of Supervisors set December 16, 2009 for a public hearing to consider amendments to the Code of the County of Chesterfield. Summary of Information: Due to several development standard modification requests to use gravel as a surface treatment for recreational vehicle (RV) storage yards, staff suggested amending the zoning ordinance to allow the use of gravel as a surface treatment for this type of use. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed zoning ordinance amendment on September 15, 2009. One citizen spoke regarding the proposed amendment during the public hearing, expressing approval of the proposed ordinance amendment. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the proposed ordinance amendment. Preparers Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Planning Attachments: ^ yes ~ No # t~4~~S5 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA The attached amendment would permit gravel surface treatment of storage yards used solely for recreational vehicles and require driveways and parking areas serving those storage yards to be paved. Also, this amendment would allow flexibility of the materials used for the surface treatment within storage yards as approved by the Director of Environmental Engineering. The use (recreational vehicle storage yard) is an appropriate short-term use until a more intense C-5 use is proposed. Allowing the surface treatment to be gravel enables appropriately screened C-5 zoned properties to be put to use without the property owner having to invest in permanent areas of pavement. Ci~~~S6 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 19-514 RELATING TO SURFACE TREATMENT FOR PARKING AREAS ACCOMODATING STORAGE OF BOATS AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 19-514 of the Code of the Count~of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: 000 (d) Surface treatment: (1) With the exception of: (i) single-family residential and farm uses; (ii) areas where track-mounted equipment is stored or displayed; (iii) property in I-2 and I-3 Districts; (iv) areas for the storage of customer vehicles in motor vehicle storage/towing lots; er (v) unpaved overflow parking areas; or vi) areas within vehicle storage yards used solely for recreational vehicle storage driveways and parking areas shall be paved with concrete, bituminous concrete or other similar material. Except in I-2 and I-3 Districts, surface-treated parking areas and drives shall be prohibited. Areas where track mounted equipment is stored or displayed, a~ areas for the storage of customer vehicles in motor vehicle storage/towing lots, and areas within vehicle storage yards used solely for recreational vehicles shall have a minimum surface of six inches of No. 21 or No. 21 A stone or similar materials as approved by the director of environmental en ineering_ 000 (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 2723 :82693.1 C ~ ~ :'~ . CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.3.d. Subject: Set Date for Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Charter Change County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Set a public hearing date for December 16, 2009 on the proposed charter change in the county's 2010 Legislative Program. Summary of Information: Charter changes require a public hearing to be held before the legislature considers the request. The proposed charter change will allow the County Administrator to receive tax information 1) which the State Tax Department makes available to the Commissioner of the Revenue and 2) which the Commissioner of the Revenue makes available to the State Tax Department and 3) which the Commissioner of the Revenue receives and maintains in his office. This will allow the County Administrator to better analyze and project county revenues. Preparers Mary Ann Curtin Title: Director, Intergovernmental Relations Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No 000058 Amend county charter to authorize the County Administrator to obtain the same data, reports and other information which the Commissioner of the Revenue obtains from the State Tax Department and which the Commissioner of the Revenue provides to the State Tax Department: CHAPTER 6. ADMINISTRATION 000 § 6.6 Department of budget and management and accounting. 000 The commissioner of revenue shall perform such duties regarding the assessment of property and licenses and the collection of other taxes as provided by the Constitution and general laws of the Commonwealth. The county administrator, or his designee shall have the same authority as the commissioner of revenue to access review receive and cony tax and revenue data, reports and other information he receives from the state tax commissioner or the state tax department. The county administrator shall also be authorized to access review, receive and copy tax and revenue data, reports and other information which the commissioner of revenue receives and maintains in his office as well as the tax and revenue data, reports and other information which he makes available to the state tax commissioner or the state tax department. The county administrator shall only divulge such data, re op rts or information to the same degree that the commissioner of revenue may divulge such data reports or information under state law. ale The commissioner of revenue shall perform such other duties as may be assigned by the board not inconsistent with his responsibilities under the Constitution and general laws of the Commonwealth. 0425:82748.1 4©4059 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 -- AGENDA „.. Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.3.e. Subiect: Set a Public Hearing to Consider the Real Estate Tax Exemption Request of The Eppington Foundation County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Q/ Board Action Requested: Set a public hearing for December 16, 2009 to consider the real estate tax exemption request of The Eppington Foundation. Summary of Information: Under Virginia law, real and personal property used for religious, charitable, patriotic, historical, benevolent, cultural, or park and playground purposes may be exempted from taxation by the Board of Supervisors. Under the policy which the Board has established, requests for real estate exemptions are considered by the Board up to a cap of $5,000. All exemption requests are considered during public hearings which are held in December of each year. The Eppington Foundation, a historical, non-profit organization located in Chesterfield County, has requested a tax exemption on a 63-acre parcel (Parcel No. 707636818200000) adjacent to Eppington Foundation in the Matoaca Magisterial District. In 2005, the Foundation began the process of acquiring Preparers Steven L. Micas Attachments: ^ Yes No Title: County Attorney 0505:82650.1 "ooo~~a CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA additional land adjacent to and near the plantation site. The Foundation plans to incorporate these property acquisitions into the entrance to the Plantation, which will insure a scenic entrance way and a substantial buffer between the plantation site and future development. For budgetary reasons, these acquisitions have been limited to approximately 60 acres per year and will continue over a total of six years. In 2005-2008, the Board approved requests from Eppington for tax exemption for the first four of the six parcels, (see the property identified on the attached map). This year's tax exemption request is for a parcel to the east of the sites for which the exemptions have already been granted (see the property identified as 13801 Eppes Falls Road). The location for the remaining parcel is also shown on the map. The 63-acre parcel for which the exemption is requested has an assessed value of $34,600, leading to an annual tax of $328.70. This assessment for this parcel is well below the $5,000 cap for the granting of a real estate tax exemption pursuant to the Board's policy. Staff has reviewed the Eppington Foundation's application and finds that it is consistent with the policy established by the Board for granting tax exemptions. In order to consider this request, the Board must schedule a public hearing for December 16, 2009. G®®O~i1 CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERING TAX EXEMPTION REQUESTS UNDER STATE LAW 1. The Eppington Foundation is exempt from taxation pursuant to §501 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code. 2. The Eppington Foundation does not possess a current annual alcoholic beverage license for serving alcoholic beverages for use on the property, although individuals who rent the Plantation for wedding receptions may obtain an ABC license and serve alcoholic beverages during the reception. 3. No director of the Foundation is paid any compensation for service to the corporation and its salaries are not in excess of reasonable salaries for services performed by the employees. 4. No part of the net earnings of the Foundation inures to the benefit of any individual. 5. The Foundation provides services for the common good of the public. 6. The Foundation does not attempt to influence legislation or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office. 0505:82650.1 ~~~Q€7~ VICINITY SKETCH The Eppington Foundation 13801 E ppes Fa I Is Roa d Eppingto Foundation 13801 Epp s Falls Road Tax Exemption ~,~~ ~G,~ Obtained 2008 ~~~ -y ?~ ~ . ~~~ ~'~°7 ~~~ 7 Tax Exemption Obtained 2007 Tax Exemptions Obtained 2005 - 2006 / / ~~ a~ ~r~ Eppington ~° u~~ u N ' F ,y, ChPS~erfield CountyAatorne}~s Office A' '''. W ~ E November 4, 2009 $ Ilxh• IA3C.i5lel VUO~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.3.f. Subject: Set a Public Hearing Date to Consider FY2011 Enhancement Projects County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~i2~~ Q( J Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to set December 2, 2009, as a public hearing date to consider FY2011 Enhancement Projects. Summary of Information: The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Enhancement Program is intended to creatively integrate transportation facilities into surrounding communities and the natural environment. Projects eligible for funding include: • pedestrian and bicycle facilities • pedestrian and bicycle educational/safety activities • scenic easement/historic site acquisition • scenic/historic highway programs • landscaping • historic preservation • rehabilitation of historic transportation buildings (Continued on Next Page) Preparers R.J. McCracken Agen721 • preservation of abandoned railroad corridors • control/removal of outdoor advertising • archaeological planning and research • mitigation of highway run-off and wildlife protection • establishment of transportation museums Title: Director of Transportation Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No ~~~~.~ 4 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information: (continued) Transportation Enhancement Projects are financed with 80 percent VDOT funds and a minimum 20 percent local match. The local match is usually provided from county funds, from other sources, and/or from in-kind contributions. VDOT staff will evaluate project applications and make a recommendation to the Commonwealth Transportation Board for inclusion in the FY2011-FY2016 Virginia Transportation Six-Year Program. Last year, VDOT allocated $19 million for enhancement projects statewide. Five projects were submitted for VDOT consideration last year: 1) Falling Creek Bridge Restoration; 2) Genito Road Street Lights; 3) Fordham Road Sidewalk, Phase I; 4) Springford Parkway, Phase I; and 5) Walton Park Sidewalk, Phase II. None of the projects received funding. VDOT staff has advised that localities should focus on completing existing projects and submit just one priority project. The county has one existing Enhancement project in need of additional funding for completion: Appomattox Riverfront Trail, VSU Segment. Staff recommends that this project be submitted to VDOT for the FY2011 Enhancement program. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board set December 2, 2009, as a public hearing date to consider FY2011 Enhancement Projects, and authorize the advertisement for that hearing. District: Countywide ~~'~~~5 ».. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.3.g. Subiect: Set a Public Hearing to Consider Lease of Real Property at Magnolia Grange, County Museum and the 1892 Jail for Operation and Preservation Programs by the Chesterfield Historical Societ County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator:) Board Action Requested: Castlewood, of Education y of Virginia The Board of Supervisors are requested to set a public hearing December 2, 2009, to consider lease of real property for historical at Castlewood, Magnolia Grange, County Museum and the 1892 Jail. Summary of Information: date of programs The Chesterfield Historical Society of Virginia currently operates programs, stores artifacts, and conducts the business of the Chesterfield Historical Society at these buildings. Previous leases of County facilities to the Chesterfield Historical Society have been terminated and these new leases will permit the Chesterfield Historical Society to "collect, preserve, interpret and promote the County of Chesterfield's past for the education and enjoyment of the public" as part of its partnership with the County. Parks and Recreation staff and the Chesterfield Historical Society recommend approval. Preparers Michael S. Golden Title: Director, Parks and Recreation Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No (300056 CUSTODIAL LEASE and USE AGREEMENT This Agreement, made this day of , 2009, by and between the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA (hereinafter referred to as "County") and CHESTERFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF VIRGINIA, (hereinafter referred to as "Historical Society".) This agreement replaces and supersedes any and all previous agreements. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County is the owner of a certain historically significant parcels of land, with improvements thereon commonly known as Castlewood, Magnolia Grange, County Museum and 1892 Jail (collectively, the "Properties"); and WHEREAS, the Historical Society is a not for profit corporation whose mission is to collect, preserve, interpret and promote the County of Chesterfield's past for the education and enjoyment of the public; and WHEREAS, the County wishes to lease the Properties to the Historical Society so that the Properties may be maintained and operated in such a way as to preserve and provide them for the education and enjoyment of the public; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set out herein, the County does hereby lease the Properties to the Historical Society subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. TERM. The County does hereby grant the Historical Society a non- exclusive lease to use the Properties as set forth herein. The initial term of this agreement shall be for a period of five (5) (__) years beginning on , 2009 and ending on 2014_, unless terminated sooner as hereinafter provided. At the (~Q®®~i~ expiration of the initial term, this agreement shall automatically be renewed for three (3) additional terms of three (3) years each unless either the County or the Historical Society notifies the other one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the expiration date of its intention not to renew. 2. USE/OPERATIONS. a. The Historical Society shall use Castlewood as an office and public research library, and shall operate Magnolia Grange, the museum, and old jail as educational facilities for the public. The Historical Society may also operate a gift shop at Magnolia Grange or at such other location approved by the County. b. The Historical Society and the County, upon mutual agreement, shall be responsible for the daily operations of the Properties. The Historical Society shall carry out its duties under this agreement in a professional manner, and ensure that the Properties are open to the public during hours mutually agreed upon by the County and the Historical Society. c. The Historical Society and the County, by mutual agreement, shall determine what artifacts in the collection are displayed to the public on these Properties, and the manner of their display. d. The President or designee of the Historical Society shall meet with the County Administrator or designee annually to report on the operation of the Properties. e. During the performance of this agreement, the Historical Society shall not discriminate against any person because of race, religion, color, sex, national origin or disability. l~®00~$ 0623:81273.1 2 £ This lease shall also include, at the County's sole discretion, supplemental county storage as needed for some of the artifacts of the Historical Society collection to the extent such facilities are reasonably available. 3. RENTAL/ADMISSION FEES. The Historical Society may set reasonable admission and event program fees for the Properties, subject to the County's approval. The revenue shall be retained by the Historical Society for use in acquiring artifacts for the Properties, maintaining the collections housed in the Properties, and for other educational purposes. Such fee schedule shall include a public rental policy for Magnolia Grange to include hours of usage and user capacity, and to be consistent with the County's special events policy. The Historical Society shall provide appropriate supervision during all private and non-County rental events occurring beyond normal business hours. County staff may be utilized for supervision of rental events, provided that the Historical Society reimburses the County for such expenses. 4. RECORD MAINTENANCE. The Historical Society shall maintain complete records of all financial transactions related to the Properties, including receipts and disbursements, in accordance with standard accounting procedures and as recommended by the County Internal Auditor. The Historical Society shall make records available to the County's Auditor upon request and the County's Auditor shall provide a fiscal financial audit every three years. 5. OWNERSHIP OF ARTIFACTS. The Historical Society shall retain ownership of the artifact collection, maintain an up-to-date inventory of the collections located on or in the Properties, provide primary storage for its collection, supplement display costs of artifacts on the Properties and, in consultation with the County, establish ~®~C~~~~ 0623:81273.1 3 a collections policy that specifies the standards for display and storage of the collection. This policy will be guided by standards promulgated by the American Association of Museums. The Historical Society retains ownership of its Library Collection and agrees to be solely responsible for its care. 6. INSURANCE. The Historical Society will cause general liability and property insurance coverage in form and amount approved by the County's Risk Manager to be maintained for Historical Society use of the Properties. 7. SUPPORT STAFFING. The Historical Society shall be responsible for maintaining appropriate staffing for the Properties, which the County will supplement as practicable with employees and/or volunteers. The Historical Society will permit at the County's discretion selected Parks and Recreation staff to work in support or supervisory capacities at the Properties. The Historical Society shall recruit volunteers to assist with operation of the Properties. The Historical Society shall supplement facility maintenance and restoration efforts by the County through fundraising. The amount of supplement shall be at the sole discretion of the Historical Society. Subject to annual appropriation of sufficient funds and at the discretion of the County Administrator or designee, the County shall employ a Historical Sites Manager whose duties will include serving as a liaison between the parties; a Facilities Coordinator at both Magnolia Grange and the Museum/Jail to oversee daily operations; and an Administrative Assistant to support operations of the Properties. ~~~~~~ 0623:81273.1 8. UTILITIES. The County shall be responsible for the costs of utilities, custodial services, general maintenance, upkeep, security, and capital improvements of the Properties. 9. TERMINATION. The Historical Society and the County shall each have the right to terminate this agreement at any time by giving notice in writing at least one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the termination date. Notice shall be given by the Historical Society to the Director of Parks and Recreation. Notice shall be given by the County to the President of the Historical Society. Any and all structures erected, improvements made or fixtures affixed to the Properties, except any personal property, during the term of this agreement shall become and remain the property of the County. 10. NO AGENCY. All employees, agents, representatives, volunteers or officials of the Historical Society shall not be deemed to be employees, agents, representatives or officials of the County. 11. IMPROVEMENTS. The Historical Society shall not make any additions, alterations, improvements or renovations to the Properties without the express written consent of the County. 12. ASSIGNMENTS. This agreement may not be sublet or assigned in whole or in part without the written consent of the County, which may be withheld in the County's sole discretion. 13. NON-APPROPRIATIONS. Any obligations of the County contained herein are subject to annual appropriations by the Board of Supervisors, and it is acknowledged by the parties that the Board of Supervisors is under no obligation to make any such appropriation by virtue of this agreement. 0623:81273.1 5 COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, Approved as to form: VIRGINIA Assistant County Attorney 2009 revised 7/10/09 By:_ Title: CHESTERFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF VIRGINIA By:_ Title: 0623:81273.1 6 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.4. Subject: State Road Acceptances County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of resolutions for referenced state road acceptance Summary of Information: Clover Hill: Somers Lark Section B Dale: Arabella at the Highlands Grampian at the Highlands Matoaca: Hallsley Section 1 - Portion Midlothian: Hayward Village Section A at Charter Colony Old Bon Air Road - Portion Watkins Centre Parkway Preparers Richard M McElfish Title: Director, Environmental EngineerincL Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Q00073 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - SOMERS LARK SECTION B DISTRICT: CLOVER HILL MEETING DATE: November 18, 2009 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: LAUREATE CT LAUREATE LN LAUREATE TURN Vicinity Map: SOMERS LARK SECTION B o y ~ ~F ~~o Qo p~ ~ ~ J \~ Z P I AN Q w ~ cT ~~ O ~ Q ~ m U C ~ T v ~\ NRD ~ ~~ ~~ CAR E Rp ~~ MIND 4r G'r eFCAR FT ti Q~ q Q RC '9 O ~ ~ ~,~~ G ~ C ~~B O,Q ~~ G Q- \~ Ogg yR/ P C cT,~c r C ~~ ~a o ~~ y~/~o cr Q y~p P ~U`Z' ~FSACA RO ' ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ Q CT ~ ~'GO o ~~ ~ R ~ SONNEC N\~-L~ ~O ~`' ~ OS~ ~~\ G~ <,q~~ pEPPER~~ ~~ C~ C~ ~ Q 0~ Q- ~ HQ ~~ ~Q~ ~ TF~ 9GTy y9~c G JP~,~ ~0 o 9~ ti 9tic~ ~Fc cti 0 V~~ ~ ~M~o o\~ c Q~ ~~~~ ~o`~ C' `t~ J C~ _ ~ T ~O Produced By Chesterfield County GIS V©~~ /'-Z CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 3 ~~. AGENDA Meeting Date: November 18, Zoos Item Number: s.D.5. Subject: Approval of Design, Authorization to Construction Contract for the River Distance Improvement Project County Administrator's Comments: Enter Into Agreements, and Award of Road at North Ivey Mill Road Sight County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Approval of design, authorization to construction contract for the River Distance Improvement Project. Summary of Information: enter into agreements, and award of Road at North Ivey Mill Road Sight In December 2006, the Board appropriated road cash proffers and authorized staff to proceed with design, right-of-way acquisition, environmental permits and construction for the River Road at North Ivey Mill Road sight distance improvement. The project involves lowering the vertical road grade of River Road west of the North Ivey Mill Road intersection about 2.5 feet and clearing trees on the north side of River Road east of the intersection. The intersection radii will also be improved to allow more efficient turning movements. In order to construct the improvements, temporary construction easements, permanent slope and drainage easements and sight distance easements need to be acquired from six landowners. Staff has met with the landowners during the plan development and explained the proposed design. The property owners were supportive of the project. (Continued) Preparers R.J.McCracken Agen720 Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director of Transportation ^ No # ~~®~~1. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA Summary of Information: (continued) Staff will attempt to negotiate a settlement for all of the easement acquisitions. If settlements cannot be reached, staff will request the Board to advertise a public hearing for eminent domain proceedings. Staff is also requesting authorization to advertise and award a construction contract, up to $200,000 to the lowest responsible bidder. Staff believes it is advantageous to the county to advertise the project as quickly as possible in light of the current economic climate. Upon the Board's approval of the design, right-of-way acquisition will begin immediately followed by utility relocations in the spring. Construction is expected to begin in early summer of 2010 with completion expected within 30 days. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board: 1) Approve the design for the River Road at North Ivey Mill Road Sight Distance Improvement Project; 2) Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator to execute easement agreements for relocation of utilities if needed; and 3) Authorize the award of a construction contract, up to $200,000, to the lowest responsible bidder. District: Matoaca CaOO®~2 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 3 AGENDA ,~, Budget and Manactement Comments: This item requests that the Board approve the design and authorize staff to execute easement agreements for the relocation of utilities if needed. This item further requests the Board to authorize the award of a construction contract, up to $200,000 to the lowest responsible bidder. The current appropriation for this project is $372,000 funded with road cash proffers. There is an available balance of $319,410 which is sufficient to complete this project. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management Q®Q J~3 RIVER ROAD AT NORTH IVEY MILL ROAD SIGHT DISTANCE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BUDGET Prelimina En ineerin $50,000 Ri ht-of-Wa $50,000 Utili Relocation $12,000 Construction $200,000 Construction En ineerin $ 30,000 Construction Contin enc $ 30,000 TOTAL $372,000 REVENUE December 2006 Traffic Shed 16 $372,000 TOTAL $372,000 C~J~D~~4 River Road at North Ivey Mill Road Sight Distance Improvement Project ~~®~~5 River Road at North Ivey Mill Road Sight Distance Improvement Project Impacted Properties ,2750 12730 12720 12741 R 12510 12550 12731 12721 -. 254 13 13512 13507 12809 13520 / ~/ \ 13513 12601 13521 13800 13617 12561 12501 12551 emttftbk/prorters/river rd ivey mill. impacte0 poD owners 11/5N9 Project Limits o Zoo aoo soo Impacted Property Feet ~.i ~ ~ L~~ ~~ ~~ ~_ 6 ~~ ~~ g g ~( b ~i ~~ - a 4 ~~ ~ ~ --- ~~ ~~ ~.~ ~~ J4 1 { f ~I 11 X11 11 t1 II ~~~ III ~I ~x ---~~ ~ -._ r~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~$g (~(~~~ y ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ $~~ ~a~ n~~ ~~~ ~~~ `~ ~~ I~ ~ $ g ~~ ° ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ `~, ~~ ~~ ~~ A ~~ ~. a ~. ~r C~ ---- ~ ~ - I 1 i1 1f 11~ ~ i i ~' 11 ------•---1~7 I ~~ f ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ Q ~aq~ ~_~ h ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~. ~~.~~ ~-~~~ ~~,~ ~ ~. ~ ~Q5~ ,~ dd n a~ ~~ ~~ ~, g ~~ ~~ O N ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ d~ .~ M b fi ^• O ~~ f~'~ ~~ m~ ~~ A ~ C 1 a-+ C7 C~ ogc~,Q~l =~~ ' o '''I ~j l m~ ~ BCD=~ ~a I L ~ (n b+o~~ot-r~ o~ i ~Bt i i ~4 Q `~~~~°o ~' i.4 n1 cn~`-rn~ ~ i i, I -~ ~ i ~ } I a ~, I i ~ ao ~ o Q ~l ii . I r l -~ 1 ~ i i ~ ~O b t, , i i a ~ `+~ ` I I? be o i 1 I ~ ~. ~ ~ I;1 /3 j ~, I ~ j IAls~d 'slat ~.~' ~ I ~ ~1` ` ~ ~" ~ y ~~ ~~ i 1 15 _~Dr9ve Inv.I'R~--'~0~.4! ~ r ~' i '~ ,,~ 4 i ! I ! ~~ r ~ j ~ ~,e~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I f ~ ~ `; cn i ~I~ ~^ Tr. 80.3 4 ~ j ! ~ A ~~ r 1 Y~~~(OAO Q~ ~ ~ I' i ~~' it i ~ y ~~~ ~ :'.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -f ~i~~or r ~~f R/PRop f r ~~ J ~~ 18"CMP2'x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f' ~ °~ ~1 ~. ~ ~-- + JJ ~ r Irv. In = 303.45' ... ~ ° i ~ r 1~ ~ -~ 1 J lnv. 0Uf • 301.75' ,LJ~~~1 ~~i ~ ~~~ jl ~ ~ " f f ~ ~ ~',~ I t ~ J BM 28 ~ ~~ I ~ ~ J J RR 5plke r ~~~Fy~ ~~ / Elev.-30727' ~~ u ~ ~ S/~. ~ ~~ n~ ~~ ~~~ _~~ ~~~ ~z `~ C~®®®~~ a ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~4 c C ~4 ~~ ~ ~ ~~ S ~ DJS 9~n W~~~ ~ ~ 5t' ~ o' t ~ r -. ~ ~ ~ l oc~.~",~cc~r ~ i ~ /,~ '~., '~ l w ~ ^, o ~ ,,.. ' ` I ~ ~' ~ m ~ i ~~ I ~so~._ 't f' .' ~ ~ I ~ 1 y//b6XaS ~ ' %~ ~ ~~, o s ~j j I ~! =-tale. Peaest woax _=r~' ~` I ~I _~: ' RAP 3.2T' ~ °~' ~ Past.''! ! I i ~ Inv. n ,54' ~•., I ~~ y. ~~~ ~ I ~ ~ _ I '~~'~l~~vS~As'0 ~ CIO ~ ~~~ C *~~ I ~'•.~ 1 .' I I ~ • ~ . a ~_ ~ y~ ~ 1 ' ' ~ ~ ~ r'~'I~ ~, Q~ ~ a I 1, ~ I ~ ~ 5otelllte Dish ~~~ ~ ~ ~ -o I ~ (1'0 6b Reta7owdl o i Z In Pl. 21' z ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ x ~ '~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ f • DrNa ~71w/ Endweey~lls_ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ Inv. In 3D5A7' -~- q I g j -~ Inv. out • .$a¢:~4' ~ ~ AIJn.Gbve •74 30-2'x•-i ~ •~ f~~ ,~• I t ~~ -~p~~ ~.a A~bw N,9' r I ~ ~ ~ Q ~d v°ti~n q ~'`'~ I ''" ~ ~ n m v ~ ~ Tr. 802 ~ ~ LA ,~ ~~ 4 ~ l 7"e/a Paee<std! '~ tlt~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ,'~~ ~ ~ -~-~-`~ ems..- ____. ~ ~ ~ a~ I 1 ', ,. . rro 6b refs. Padasto! I ~~ : -.~ ~ --- - ~ ~r~lnv.' x-i x1 PP 87'43-2+?-I ~ ~\'_'~:~ = "_-- .~. w/ Guy j f ~ j Refle~nrs ~. i ~ ~ PP ~~, 'T43- - i~ \ w/ s - ~ 1 ~ •~ : j .~.::'ti; .:,:~ ^ ~~ I ~ ~ In ss !~;:7~F?,::..,°= ~'e._1: - rpv, :=f;;;'If .~~.~! + ~~~~~~SSSSSS a?n ,, ;.f `~`' ,;,lv_ , y„ ~` Noll :~ :rani ~P®IJ~~J ~~~~ ~~ ~~,~~ I Q ~~a 1 ~',~ i I rate. Pedestal ~ r""'t n PP •743-2a-1, , a~t ~ w/ Guy lv~:t ~ Z ~ tY ~'PE 75rRCPg-~------- ~~-_ T G-° inv. !n = 30&AY ~ I -= ~ ~ ,_-- ~-- ~ a .-- ~ o ~~' ~U~l mc~o y ~ vf~ ~ po u ii ~~~o ~ ~ ~~ ~.F-,~-. ~~~ ~, ~a"D i ~. ~~~~ y f ~ ~ ~a m~~ ~L 'O ~~ ~~[~~~~ r~ ~i ,wNzom ~~'~ i ~~ ~~~~ ~a o m _ V ~~ j~d - ~......... it _ ~ _a ~~~ .. _ . ~ ~~ +~i ~ N PP •743-2o-3 ZZSS~~~° W/ GUy ~~~II ~, ,,, \~ . g~i ~~ I 1 !~~~ fl li+ ~, ~ li ~~~ ~:., . • - 0~ ~1 iii ~ ~ioGH' I ~~ ~~ Ir ~~~ .. Match Urls Sto.21~00 Sheefi 9 J ~ ~ tTo ~ \ ' i' i .i' ~ low ~ ~olfQ ~ y..~,. -- ;71 Refle~rs ~o ~ ~~ `~ PP ~~ ~0 '"743- -1 '~ w/Gtys r '~ x----'Jx % ~ ~ o ~~ a '1 ;, ~b ,+ r • q +~ ~ Mafl ~ ~ y ~ It m~ Boxes ~~ ~ ~~~ i .~ ~. y ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ I i ' q ^+~ • tl oQ ~x ~, ~`Qw i ti ~~ ~ ~~ i ; ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~. ~~; ~f _, . ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~.~ ~ 8 ~~~ ~ ~ $~ ~s~ n~ ~ ~ V' .I -~. m.,.~W s. Brick ~~"~ , ~, . :!, i ... ~..... wall SI'd ~IlEr>!r'~oe .~ ........ , .. ~ 1AF19,A~4'A~r. 821 I • • ~• Asplavlt i 4YaJ -- /g/l7/~1,~~~_ '~ ... ..~ ~rd l ~, .~i'~,2_ Mgl/box ~ `- rN N~~ (~~®~~~ Malt Une SY'v.21~00 Stae~' 7 n ~ t r---t o ~ 1 ~\ sN ~ !~ ~ ~ mom, r r.-...I o ~ I ~ hl ~3 il -----^iF-~~~ ~. r i Ij ~ d ~C ` +f i ~ = ~--~ N. $. i . ~ m ~, ~ g cnbM~ ~ c ~~ j ~• ~ ~~1R1~Zp ~7t Q ~ ~ ~ j i~• a ~~O~nl~ Oi ,, ~ ~ ~ gg~N ~~ ~J ll j 9 ~ ! ~ j * R Splks ~ a ~ x, j ~• lev. ~ 3!297' ~ ~ I I •~• `9!' I ~ n j a j '$ I •--~ ~ ~; j p ~ b j ~: ~i f I ~ ~ ~ r~~/ ~ , I ,.- , ~ see ~• j I +--~ 7 ~ g ~ ,.- ,' j ~ ~ - --~' _ -~' j ~ ~ Te1e. Pedestal ~ ~ ~~~ Ort+re-,.-_~.~ II r I _ !2" RCP ~ I I Or/v e '': f ~ I + CD Aldilboxes Irw. 0tlt - 30559' ~ ~ ~, , ~ 4 i ,, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ rr1 0 Z0-6 - -- --••~-}---•-- -•~'OVN• ~ ~ • ~ ~ x k ~Jl ~. R ~ ~ to ~ ~a 1 ~ ~ A C ~ ~ ~ J ! ~ 'f~aoue~ la M 8b ~ X ~c ~~. ~ ~ ~~ I I .I ~ x ~ ~~ ~ , k i ~ ~I! ~ Q~O~fl41 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.6. Subject: Cancel a Public Hearing to Consider the Abandonment of a State Road Adjacent to Watkins Centre Parkway County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Cancel the public hearing scheduled for November 18, 2009 to consider the abandonment of a State Road adjacent to Watkins Centre Parkway. Summary of Information: On October 14, 2009, the Board approved a resolution to set a public hearing for November 18, 2009, to consider the abandonment of a State Road adjacent to Watkins Centre Parkway. This action was requested by staff prior to confirmation of the proper abandonment process by the Virginia Department of Transportation because of a critical timeline for an Economic Development Fast Track project. Subsequent to staff's request and the Board's action, on October 28, 2009, staff received a letter from the Virginia Department of Transportation stating that the abandonment of the subject road must be processed by the Commonwealth Transportation Board and not the county. Advertisement of the public hearing has not been published. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # (~®®®~2 VICINITY SKETCH Cancel a Public Hearing to Consider the Abandonment of a State Road a A~ ~~~ ~~~11A TP~~ ~T~ ~ p1. St~ba F~oad to t~`Abant~onad '4 ~~ "1% ~~ ~~ N Chesterfield County Right of Way Office w ~ 'E October 28, 2009 s 1 Ilcl ~ 351.17 Ret ~~ o ~~~ ~», CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.7. Subject: Award of Construction Contract for County Project #01-0199 Jahnke Road Water Line Improvements County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: U/ Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to award the construction contract to Johnson & Glazier Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $460,337.50 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. Summary of Information: This project consists of construction of approximately 5,000 feet of 8-inch diameter ductile iron water line and associated appurtenances. Staff received twelve (12) bids ranging Johnson & Glazier Construction Co., Inc. amount of $460,337.50. The county's Requardt & Associates, LLP, has evaluated the contract to the low bidder. from $460,337.50 to $991,079.00. submitted the lowest bid in the engineering consultant, Whitman, the bids and recommends award of Funds are available in current CIP. Preparers George B. Haves Title: Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ®®0~~'4 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY __ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS "" AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Budget and Management Comments• Staff recommends that the Board approve the construction contract with Johnson & Glazier Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $460,337.50 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. This bid came in lower than the budgeted funding, leaving extra contingency money if necessary. Funding is available for this contract. Preparers _ Allan M. Carmody Title: Director. Budget and Management VICINITY SKETCH Award of Construction Contract for County Project #01-0199 Jahnke Road Water Line Improvements .- B~.K V1S pR ~' ~R~G~pR 8RENTFORO OR ~~' M RoB'i^4t~ us r~ ~uQP~p~ ~~~ o ~ ~r Y ~ N.{ a~GHON DR ~~ ~ 9p ~~ ~~ O ~{ ~pg44R ~ 'A~ 5p~ ~ r~ 3~~t~t' ~~t~tt~~ 5t ~`~~~Q ~ z~ 4F~ W 60Y1V1~1nIDR ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~J `f ~~, { PROPOSED ~~ WATERLINE ~ ~ y YAK ~~ ~~ slb G ~ ACT -~~ ~.o g~l~`~~~ qL~~r aavS ~ ~~~lN -0y ~ V o W T,~~ ~~ S- ~Y ~' l'ER ~~ yi1 ~ PoP L.r 5~t~ ~ SPR~~ o~ vy~r~~CT$ J4~~pPKs ~fi yo ~~~ 0 ~~ ~,~NKE ROA~o C ~ E4GWECCCR D 2~ 4~k~ O ~~G~ ~ ~o x ~ '~ ~ ~~o ~ z~ v g ~'¢~ ~~ s ~7. o ~~' UQS~ ~tLQ .~ y~ ~' 'N ~ U d pus ~ K~~ ~' ~~~~ gay `h ~h'~'~D DR ~~~ aou4p~~vt~" 8p~{~~ ~~ 40 ~' 9 f0 E~'q3 ~~' l \~~4 ~ 80U~fi_~~ N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities w ' - -E November 9, 2009 s 1 I~ci - 1,01296hct ®Ql ~~® CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.8.a. Subject: Request Permission for an Existing Concrete Driveway and a Proposed Concrete Block Retaining Wall to Encroach Within a Sixteen-Foot Drainage Easement Across Lot 6, King's Farm At Riverdowns, Section 5 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Grant Richard M. Wood and Beth T. Wood permission for an existing concrete driveway and a proposed concrete block retaining wall to encroach within a 16' drainage easement across Lot 6, King's Farm At Riverdowns, Section 5, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Richard M. Wood and Beth T. Wood have requested permission for an existing concrete driveway and a proposed concrete block retaining wall to encroach within a 16' drainage easement across Lot 6, King's Farm At Riverdowns, Section 5. This request has been reviewed by Environmental Engineering and Comcast Cablevision and the existing storm sewer will not be affected. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No 00009'7 VICINITY SKETCH Request Permission foi• an Existing Concrete Dilveway and a Proposed Concrete Block Retauting Wall to Encroach VVitltin a Sixteen Foot Drainage Easement Across Lot 6, IUngs Fai1n At Riveidowns, Section 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ \ \ REQUEST P~MISSfON FOR _ / AN EXtSTiA1G DRIVEWAY & V / / A PROPOSEQ C ONCRETE BLOCKREfA1NlNG WALL ~ ~~' D L y ~ SG ~ J ~ i i J Gy '~ ~ r~ • ~ ~ ~ a ~~ ~- N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W E S 1 Ircl - t16.6T Eet ~~®3~8 ~c a~ ~~ cox _ EXISTING FEATURE LOCATIONS AND LDT 9 "' SURVEY DATA FROM FlELD SURVEY ~Y ~'i JouFFE a~ AssoaAT>:s. INC. oAT>=o CROSS CREEK ~ / ~ man JULY 9, 2009 SECTION 'D' ~ \ RED%~ ,~~ '~aR ~ G •~ ,~ ~ LOT 8 \ V G' / , • ' ` --=a=Ea~Nr aemr ••' ~•-. ~- of oosr+c ~ ~ ~ • / `~ otaaon ~'S / ~ ~ i ~ ~ ,• ' /~ ~ -~_ ~ / ~ Wei' . . -~oasnMC ~ u~ '~' ~ b hEADV ~ ~ i~ ~c~ ~ O i i~ ~_ ~ ~L LDT Richard M. Wood ~ ~ ~ Beth T. Wood °'°°"' °~°` ~ ~~ 14406 Post Mili Dr. °0 1 ~ ~°°E ~i DB. 8815 PG. 472 \ £x ~ ~~ PIN: 723723444800000 \ x ~ ' rE ,~p• LDT 7 ~ w, \ ti 1 EX 2 STDRY ~ j ~ • /~+ (~ \ n \ BJPICK 3 VINYL SIDING ~ \ #14406 LICENSED AREAS 0 c,~i ' ~ ~ . • ~*~ ~ ~ ~ ;1 '~ 1 . m~ vmr~ \ ~ ~xs ~i ~fAS~ENr I - - ~ . --s ~r ~ 102.00' ~ 2002.54' TO THE V/L S03'49'26'E EXT'D N-~ SE DRIVE PDST MILL DRIVE PROPOSED REAR YARD IMPROVEMENTS WOOD RESIDENCE LOT 6, KINGS FARM at RIVERDOWNS, SECTION 5 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Parker Consultin~q, LLC 12511 Hidden Oaks curt SCALE: 1" = 40' DATE: 09/; Richmond. Virginia 23233 ~ e~ ~ oR~~ ear Faa (ao4) er-aeee t.mt CFIEdCm BYe uinnn nr~ 1..~~®C.P.'F~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.8.b. Subject: Request Permission for a Proposed and Existing Fence to Encroach Within an Eight-Foot Easement Across Lot 21, Block O, Scottingham, Section H County Administrator's Comments• County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Grant Sherry M. Confer permission for a proposed and existing fence to encroach within an 8' easement across Lot 21, Block O, Scottingham, Section H, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Sherry M. Confer has requested permission for a proposed and existing fence to encroach within an 8' easement across Lot 21, Block O, Scottingham, Section H. This request has been reviewed by the Utilities Department, Environmental Engineering and Comcast Cablevision and there are no improvements in the easement. Approval is recommended. District: Clover Hill Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # C)+0®~~~ VICINITY SKETCH Request Peilnission for a Proposed and Eadsting Fence to Encroach vF'rthin an Eight Foot Easement ~lci•oss Lot 21, Block O, Scottingham, Section H REST PEI'~YIISSION FOR ASED &EXISTWG ~,,P N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities w; E s I hcl - 116.E ket NOTES: THIS PROPERTY 15 LOCATED IN F.E.M.A. FLOOD ZONE "_" CURRENT OYVNER: SHERRY M. CONFER D.B. 8687 PG. 879. UTILITIES UNDERGROUND. XX -FENCE SOL?,R ~~ I ~~ LICENSED AREA SECTION ~~~~~ ~O` ~P I p ~~ I p~p ~ S ROD ~ L. ~N ~h' FOUN 5~ ~' I8' I ~ . \ s. ~ ~ ~~S e' ,~. ~ 1~g ~ ~ ~ , poti \~'yF ~~ ~ ~ irJp'a°3a~ ~xy ~ ~ Fq r \~r Roo L m ~x~ ~ JJ SHEDE \ ~NS. ~\/~~ ~ -~ X' ~ ~~ _21 6~~~~ 5197~ACRES ~~'Ftir ~,P ONE 1/2 STORY ~ ~I ~~ ROD FOUL 6x.22' 509 ~ L=1 10Ab' R~b9b 23' i i ~~ `~ Z Sherry M. Confer 509 Greencastle Rd. DB. 8687 PG. 879 PIN: 756702119400000 O~ ~r0 TFiE ~ ~~ ~fT>= ~ D O^D RoD FOUND GRE~'NCASTLE RO~gD PLAT SHOW/NG /MPROVE'MENTS ON LOT 21, BLOCK "O'; PLAN OF "SCOTT / N G H A M '; SECT/ON 'H'; /N THE CLOVER H/LL D/STR/CT OF CHESTERF/ELD COUNTY, V/RG/N/A. SEPTEMBERS, 2009 • I ~$pLrtlf ~p~ SHOWN HEREON IS 9UDJECTTO EASEMENTS Of' RECOIGD OR OTHERWISE~~~y~v TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THIS PLAT COMPLIES MATH THE MINIMUM STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THE VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ~~ ARCHITECTS, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, AND LAND SURVEYORS, 9 -16 - 2009 Mc~~1VIGHT »g>~a>~ ~• ~ ~~~ & ASSOCIATES, P. C. unnvaas aAnn~as 201 IIAAN R/DGE LANE ~hD RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23236 scALE: 'I° . q0~ TELEPHONE (804) 320-2646 JOB NUMBER: 88062021 „,!„ :i 2 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ' AGENDA Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.8.c. Subiect: Request Permission for a Wooden Picket Fence to Encroach Within a Sixteen- Foot Drainage Easement Across Lot 63, Edgewater At The Reservoir, Section 8 County Administrator's Comments• County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Grant Zhe Zhang and Fei Han permission for a wooden picket fence to encroach within a 16' drainage easement across Lot 63, Edgewater At The Reservoir, Section 8, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Zhe Zhang and Fei Han have requested permission for a wooden picket fence to encroach within a 16' drainage easement across Lot 63, Edgewater At The Reservoir, Section 8. This request has been reviewed by Environmental Engineering and Comcast Cablevision and there are no improvements in the easement. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ~fl~~.~3 VICINITY SKETCH Request Permission foi• a `'4'ooden Picket Fence to Encroach Within a Sixteen Foot Drainage Easement Across Lot 63, Edgewater At The Rescivoir, Section 8 ~tl ~`~ %~ s tt~ , r~t~~~tarr c-~ A PICKET FEYVCE Q N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities . W ~- E S 1 Irol - ~I6.67 tPt ®®~~,~~ ~~ Savrps wew Place O Lot 14 Zhe Zhang Fei Han 2617 Savage View Dr. Midlothian, VA 23113 N34'43'35"W X iX Lot 20 ~ ~ ~~ 85.00' Driveway ' 8. ' ~I 8.50 WI e ~ ~ S I O m Floor EI. 105 ~j ^ I Lot 64 Lot 62 e I I ~ I ~ I I ~ 3~ I N ~ d.,~., w~a 3 m p ,~kd ~'~~~~ I ~, N I 's I it ~r ~ ~ I = 'uS S34'43'35~E 85.00' XX -FENCE Plat Showing the LICENSED AREA Proposed improvements to Edgewater O Reservoir Section 8 Lot 63 2818 Savage View Ortve ~ E ~ 0 Ac E BuHden Matoooa istrict ao~ FaK ~ 020 est d y (~fl~D~ ~J5 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.8.d. Subject: Request Permission for Brick Pavers to Encroach Within a Twenty-Foot Sewer Easement Across Property at 13200 North Woolridge Road the Headstock Amphitheatre At The Green County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Grant LATC, LLC permission for brick pavers to encroach within a 20' sewer easement across property at 13200 North Woolridge Road the Headstock Amphitheatre At The Green, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: LATC, LLC has requested permission for brick pavers to encroach within a 20' sewer easement across property at 13200 North Woolridge Road the Headstock Amphitheatre At The Green. This request has been reviewed by the Utilities Department and the existing sewer line will not be affected. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # t~~~~ ~6 VICINITY SKETCH Request Peilnission for Buck Pavers to Encroach Within a Twenty Foot Sewer Easement Across Property at 13200 Noi•tlt Woohidge Road the Headstock Amphitheah•e At The Gi•een OVE HILL RD 7 ao 9 0 9 a ~ 11 r i ~~ O ONE' ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ G7 `~ ~~ oa`'~ ~ ~ Over N`~ p REaU~ST PERMISSION POR ~21GK PAVER ~o~ N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities , w E s I hcl - L16.6T !et c I N I N 1 ~I ~ I `~~` 2 ~~_`` ~ W^ h4 I > ~ ;N I o~ -r i ~x~ ~ ~r I I N^ N"' =~ I N a ~ I ~~ ~~ Hm° ~~ I ~' ~ N i v~ ~ ~ 31 ~~^~ ~$ ~ m gl~ ~ Q l I~ ~I 2~ I o ~~ . ~I I ~ ~ z~ g ~ ~ I `~' N `° o ~ s l ~ ~ ^ A ` ~ Z W ~ ~ 4; \ Z ~ ~ N \v~p ~~ \ ` \\ \\ 5^~ ^ ~I~ z " "~' • '~ ~ ~ W \~ ~\ ~\ W ~ ~ ~ co v~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w W W ~,Kyy~'~'fre ~ w 0.i ~ \ ~~`` aW ~ ao W F ~ . o `~ '~ ~~~ H ~~N ®z s ~; ~ ~v 3 ~ C'~ ~ W ~ ~16~ ~3~ ti E„~,'W o g6~~W~ O~ N x G4 x ~ ,~ ~~ ~ as ~ ~ ~ ~o ryry~~ W ~ N II xz ~ ~ U r-~ o F ~ ~x ~~ ~+ U r~i IYi H U1 ~~®~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.8.e. Subject: Request Permission for Stage Structure, Deck, Seating Area, Proposed Asphalt Path, Existing Wooden Bridge and Brick Pavers to Encroach Within a Variable Width Storm Water Management System Best Management Practice System Easement Across Property at 13200 Woolridge Road the Headstock Amphitheatre At The Green County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Grant LATC, LLC permission for stage structure, deck, seating area, proposed asphalt path, existing wooden bridge and brick pavers to encroach within a variable width SWM/BMP easement across property at 13200 Woolridge Road the Headstock Amphitheatre At The Green, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: LATC, LLC has requested permission for stage structure, deck, seating area, proposed asphalt path, existing wooden bridge and brick pavers to encroach within a variable width SWM/BMP easement across property at 13200 Woolridge Road the Headstock Amphitheatre At The Green. This request has been reviewed by Environmental Engineering and the existing variable width SWM/BMP will not be affected. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No ~J0149 VICINITY SKETCH Request Permission foi• Stage Structure, Deck, Seating Area, Proposed Asphalt Path, E1alisting VbTOOden Bridge and Brick Pavers to Encroach Withht a Vailable Wfdth Stoiltt Water Management Best Management Practice Easement Across Property at 13200 VVoohzdge Road the Headstock Amplutheatre At The Green 6. VILLAGE VIEW DR ~ Z z~ ~ 7. ENCLAVE CREEK LI OVE HILL RD el~\ r r I f ~ ~~ !1 ~INq~ RE©UEST RERhdISSi.ON FOR STAG~:STRl1CTkJRE, QECK, SEAT{NG ARf~ PROPOSI=D ASPt~44t.T PATH, 9 EXISTING WOOQEN BRIQG~AND BRICKPAVI~RS ~Cll !~ / 9 \ 111 ~ 11=,, ~~ 0 ~'~'~~a ~~ N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W ~ - ~E S lhcl-116.67 4et V®®~~lJ '~ ~ \ ~ / / ~ ~~ ~ ~ •.~ ~ •~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ d ~ t / ~ ~ ~ t!2 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~r~ ~ ~ ~ b ~' / ~ ~ ~ ~ _ l ~~ .~- } ~~ ~~ ~~:`~ ~/ ~' ~ ,~ , ~~ d ~~ \ y; h Q ~~ i ^ ~ W ~ • .~. ~Q~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~s ~ . ~ ~ ,~ . ~ rsrom '' ~° ~ ~~ ~ a ~ M 'fl N ~ 2 p 0 3 U'fl~~ ag ~~ N~a ~O' UoNn :.~ ~ +`z~~ ~~ N. WOOIItIpGE RD. ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~» AGENDA Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.8.f. Subject: Request Permission for a Proposed Block Retaining Wall and Fence to Encroach Within a Sixteen-Foot Easement Across Lot 3, The Sanctuary At Watermill, Section A County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Grant Angela Nadeau permission for a proposed block retaining wall and fence to encroach within a 16' easement across Lot 3, The Sanctuary At Watermill, Section A, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Angela Nadeau has requested permission for a proposed block retaining wall and fence to encroach within a 16' easement across Lot 3, The Sanctuary At Watermill, Section A. This request has been reviewed by the Utilities Department, Environmental Engineering and Comcast Cablevision and there are no improvements in the easement. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # VICINITY SKETCH Request Permission for a Proposed Block Retaating V4'all and Fence to Encroach Withal a Sixteen Foot Easement Across Lot 3, The Sanctuai;y At ti'~rateiznill, Section A 'o~ 9~ REDDEST PERMISSION FOR BLOCK RETAINING WALL. & FENCE ~/ d lei N Chesterfield County Department of Utildies W ~E $ 1 hcl - ~16.6T tFet ®®~~~~+ *Undergr~vnd Ut;Aities - LICENSED AREA r L°~ BLOCK WALL AND FENCE - Nor7(fj' r } /n Root of f- !O" ObAr 16' E/ISM£NT p1C W well se9•~.,u4al ~ sel~d ~$~~ 3~ p5~ t~" w u}e ~,3' °FF ply ~~ ~ l aa'~ ~ t~` a~ h y 23J.11 ' TO THE N/L OF WA1L-RM/LL p.~wAr /ExT'o. ~ ~F -9 y 9TH -4 c~,Q~il` LOT 7 N29~6'42"W 85:09' B' - ~~ ~ LOT3 ~ o.2z ACRE 24.9' ,2624 5~ 16 0' r, L=14.84' Rod(/)52d'24 04' Ra.30~ 86' Angela Nadeau 2624 Seabird Dr. DB. 8754 PG. 824 PIN• 7206 SEABIRD DRIVE VAR~G4BLE N'IOTN R/-Y LOT 6 _-J r r r ~ jCuJ F~tN~ `L i NC of P~~Y LOT 4 wore Rod(!) t~`~~T H o f Pry ,~~5. ~ ~ 1[nrk B. Henn No. 1813 ~1/2~/eons ~ . 88366600000 Improvements on LOT 3, SECTyONA a4~:11/27/zoos THE SANCTUARYAT WATERM/LL scnl`~:1 =30' Chesterfield County, 1/irginio J09 NU: C0610s72 R£.• Cliff-STNF BUIL.D£RS dr DEt~LOP£RS 1NC. • PIANNE:RS • AACINTiCTS • iNOI/~ERS • SUit'VEYOEIS• §Q1 Arrmrlw+hr Ro~O •91AN tUt! •RlChnwd, t/Mplni~ 27236 •P-wne 191M) T94-p57t •Frc (a01) 794-24C#6 ~wINI.Oiti~9r.OC O®0~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~» AGENDA Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.8.g. Subject: Request Permission for an Asphalt Walkway to Encroach Within a Sixteen-Foot Sewer, Easement Between Lots 1 and 2, Westerleigh, Section 2 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Grant Westerleigh Community Association, Inc. permission for an asphalt walkway to encroach within a 16' sewer easement between Lots 1 and 2, Westerleigh, Section 2, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Westerleigh Community Association, Inc. has requested permission for an asphalt walkway to encroach within a 16' sewer easement between Lots 1 and 2, Westerleigh, Section 2. This request has been reviewed by the Utilities Department and the existing sewer line will not be affected. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # O~®~'~5 VICINITY SKETCH Request Permission foi• an Asphalt Walkway to Encroach Within a Sixteen Foot Scwci• Easement Between Lots 1 and 2, Westeileiglt, Section 2 ITV ~i~iAt~" ~iA~.~41~1~AiY a 0 N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W E S I hcl - ~16.6T tet t ~ 3 i- fn W C ~i~i s~~G,~ k bO 2 Z ~ ~ o ~,~ WO~nn ~ gB " 'W'^^ w ~ m ~ 1~0 ~ <~ Q v/ %r~~o~ ~ ~e? Z W ~ ~ ;q 9 ~ ' 3Yw'~EJv ~ ##LL yaw S 3 FW NV CDN ~ ~ ,: aN3t3S r ~ W~OA~ yg 5 7 ~ i~ QO$~m t W~ >V $2S~ a~. y aa~° a ~" ' QQ~ v ~ ~F ~ V ~ F 00 B ~ ~ ~V 3n~ ;;; v ~~~ ~ ~, ~ .. ROAD ~ ~ ~..ai~ ~ ~ (40 ww~~F~wwF~www Uti$Aar ~„p~C~G ~9i: 6j ~~ ~Y~~,~~'~',gS~I~O4~~~S ~`' ~ ~ a • ~ ~ ~ !;~ Q ~p~p N g \ \ \ 1 ~ ~ .. z~ n ~~ r-4, EV vl~~mn ~v ry.q °~ 9 ~- o ~ 4 - J~N~`aNYf a~~s.~~,o I ~ ~ 1i7 -c ~~ `, Z Of,' F.y ~ U 1 ~~~ U v~p+ \' J I eq~ Lag _' ~ ~ ~~ 4. R ~ ~ 1.si~icJ •cco£ '=rss z' F~ g ~ma~~ IY ~ rye O~ 1.i ~ v _ /9 f e^e ~ ~ ~ - \ ~\,~`C (7 ~ p a ~ ~~ yu 5- .?S 5l I J` m i r'c~ ti a \ \ ~ R ~ -y~ _ ~--D~i~~- :T ./.6_ 58-3.8 Z. `-Z:i~ L ~ W o` ~ V GJ6 ~\\\ //k (v O 71 ~ - 96 ~~ LNI ~' ~'9l1'>' ..... `.. "~O£y_ _ ~ Qi ~ S{ 9 ~ °lp'~ \ \J $ d1 .~ f~ ~_ Sl~3. is ZN - ~'', . ~..~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~.i,~ Sri O \\ ~ ~ ( Isa-O£l ~ --L5L C ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ W -. \ .T O ' I %% 4~c 0 - _ _ ~ °~"' .X ~~ _ - I I ~fi~ R.~~ O iii 1-;~ ~'/ _ - ~ /" Q~ C A :`~P -.f y'OYl 3,By, lflAZN rJ k. M K 2~ c7 ° ~^o = psi ~ ~" .L, :' ,:y~:,~ lan0~ 3 _ W I I cry ~y ~ _z~i:. ~WW~~ ,; fA S ~ ~;~ I e , so ~ / „a, b ~ ~ - r ^ New I I r ,;i s° r. £s sy '~ I ^~ ~ ~~ ~.' .:gab. ~ c, _ ` (z~.~~ %k' b '' C m ~'i >7 / ~'~~ I ~' ^J Q m ? ~ 40, RI' tY~o L 133HS Ol HOlt/W I~ ' ' ' ' ¢ ~ U ri NO r r te • r n ic .o EV n ~ m N e EO Ed N Ei .- r b • r •f W ~ ZZ r ~~•• mWmW ~ N ~ + . ~ ~ r . ' o m Io n h h • m n + h h U N 2 n 2 2 N Z 2 Z Z ~ ~ ~ ' ; ' m ' ~ ~ - ^ m F ~ r ~ ~ ~ n ~ ^ i: ° ~ ~ ~ ^ n ° g r N S • ^ h n h h ~ g _ ~ _ _ . o . _ Y ~ N N + ~ ~ Y . a g r u . n n Y . .~ ~ U o ENi v c~i i'i cfOi ~ c°3 ~ i~ o o o o ES i~ b o cNi cNi v v v v v E~ E~i cni u c"3 cMi ~ c~i u cYi v v V®~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.9.a. Subiect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Cloverleaf Drive from Caswell Associates Limited Partnership County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.263 acres along Cloverleaf Drive from Caswell Associates Limited Partnership, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.263 acres along Cloverleaf Drive from Caswell Associates Limited Partnership. This dedication is for improvements in conjunction with the development of Stonebridge. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No o~o~~s VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Cloverleaf Drive from Caswell Associates Limited Partnership ®®~~~ Chesterfield County Department of Utilities ' N W •- E $ 1 hc1 eq~alr 6668; tet ~ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY i Q OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD D.B. 6016 PG. 31 TAX PARCEL D.B. 6140 PG. 96 LINE D.B. 7112 PG. 382 JESS/E JAMES BRANCH AND N: 3705128.95 CARRIE ROBERTSON BRANCH D.B. 8439 PG. 844 E: 11765222.37 700 STARVIEW LANE GP/N.• 764 705 822 70 00 00 TOTAL) D.B. 803 PG. 158 25'85 ' g4 ~ 897• ' 25, 51 04 E 9 1 I GP1N: 765705651800000 50 j - f~ N7 , - - I I 25' TEMPORARY I 1 i o o ~, CONSTRUCT/ON 1 ~- '' 1 ^ ~ ~ ~ TRAVIS BROWN AND z EASEMENT ~ a O O LORRA/NEBERRY (11,512 SO. FT.) I .~ ~ ~ ~ 700 STARVIEW LANE 0 ~ D. B. 4002 PG. 959 ~ 1 2 ~ GPIN.• 765705430900000 I- j o W 100 ~ 0 2 1^ o 1 ~ p 1 ~a v N O - ~ - ~k - IW I io ~ r, - 0 ~; Io 1 r\ I ~ ~ z w NOTES: 1 ° v _ 1 ~ O 1. THIS PLAT lS BASED ON A CURRENT 12 ~ W W FIELD SURVEY. I I W CASWELL ASSOCIATES cvp j ~ 2. TNlS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE I v ~ LIMITEDPARTNERSH/P 0 ~ BENEFITOFATITLEB/NDER, THEREFORE 1 ~ 7200 CLOVERLEAF DRIVE ° ~ ~ ~ ALL EXISTING EASEMENTS MAY NOT BE D.B. 3000 PG. 551 Z I t o o SHOWN. GP/N: 764704818400000 ~ 1 ° 3. JMPROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. I ~~ ~ 1 I 263 ACRE 0 1 1 . (DEDICATION) ~ DALROAD, L.L.C. 125.35 34.65' 710 STARVIEW LANE (11,463 SQ. FT.) D.B. 6226 PG. 722 1 I GPIN: 765704658900000 O ROD FOUND 1 6~"1 ~ ROD SET I ~ S1 ROD SET BYALTA SURVEY I 1 O~,~a PREPARED BY TlMMONS `~` ` ~ GROUP DATED APRIL 2, 2009 ° - ~ 5.68' 0~ _ 5~ - - ~- ~- t - ~ 26'1 54.93' - 25 . _ ~ _. TOTAL) -J- V 248.71' ( S83°00'44"W 882't TO THE WEST LIN~- EXTENDED ~~ - S83°00'44'W N: 37 .85 OF STARVIEW LANE RLEAF DRIVE E: 65212.86 ~~~L • O CLOVE STAT 0' R/W) 644 PLAT SHOWING ^. ~^^ j~~ ~ 8 0.263 ACRE OF LAND c, 1 • ~?: o~varrr 9; ~ AND A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT . ~' °' zza~ ~ scA~E ~°=so~ ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF ~ ~ 9-10-09 '~' ~ ~'%~~ suxv~~~' CASWELL ASSOCIATES ' ' o so ••...•. 120 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP COUNTY P ROJECT NO. 06-0390 THIS DRAWING PREPARED AT THE MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT Cheste~eld County, Va CORVORATEOFFICE R rk 300 I Richm nd VA 23225 1001 B ld a S R ypp R VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH 0U0.5. DATE: SEPT. SO, 009 SCALE; AS SHOWN w ou ere a y, u e o , TEL 804.200.fi500 FA% 804.560.1016 www.timmans.com SHEET 1 OF 1 I.N.: 27308 Site Development ~ Residential ~ Infrastructure ~ Technology DRAWN BY: D. SAWYER CHECK BY: D.J.S. TIMMONS GROVP ••'~••• . )1~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~» AGENDA Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.9.b. Su_ biect: Acceptance of Parcels of Land for the Extension of Weir Road from DSRA II, LLC County Administrator's Comments• County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Accept the conveyance of parcels of land containing a total of 0.806 acres for the extension of Weir Road from DSRA II, LLC, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of parcels of land containing a total of 0.806 acres along Briggs Road from DSRA II, LLC. This dedication is a condition of zoning case 09SN0146, for the extension of Weir Road to John Tyler Community College. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager oao~zs w VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of Parcels of Land for the Extension of V4'eiu• Road from DSRA II, LLC x fi m S~ ~` Q R ~ v ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ CN ~~ N1t 4 Iron Bridge Rd IT 1 4 ~OE~ O>f x.806 ACI•~ Ql~CZ~10t1 ~ ~ ~ Int 95 G~., ,' ~P Ra w~.~ ~~ ~~ W A~~~ \ g iF~~ D J~ H 0 ~~ o~ R ~ L Q N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities 1N ~ - ' E S 1 hcl - 666.E !e t ®,~. 3+.1 CURV E TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT DELTA CHORD BEARING CHORD C1 330.00' 185.38' 9521' 32'11'09" S 48'53'57' E 18295' C2 270.00' 317.08' 179.6T 67.18'58' N 31'21'03' W 299,15 C3 270.00' 7.31' 3.68' 1'33'08' N 65'48'03' W 7.31' G 270.00' 138.87 70.98' 29'Z7'34' N 17'01'12' E 137.30' UNE TABLE UNE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 64.59'31' E 10828' COMMONYVEALTH OF VIRGINIA L2 N 84'59'31' W 122.34' 13111 JEFFERSON DAMS HKiHWAY ' L3 S 36'49'43' W 24.70' GPIN: &906.52803'!00000 ~ L4 N 48'28'17' W 27.80' D.B. 819, PG. 575 13 . L5 N 46°28'1 T W 57.30' - --~___-----_- I - - - ~ "- ~ - N 3652507.04 ~'~ t,1~ v~ ~ o"a A A VIRGINIA STATE BOARD ~ ! OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE ~I I 13019 BRIGGS ROAD GP6V:800852707600000 Z ~ I D.B. 907, PG. 617 VARIABLE WIDTH! ! ~~~ e~ .~ VARIABLE WIDTH DEDICATION 0.471 ACRES (20,516.76 S.F.) 120.73' DEDICATION 0.041 ACRES (1,785.96 S.F.) DSRa a uc 13013 BRIGGS ROAD GPIN:800852457800000 I D.B. 7403, P(i. 205 l 60' D.B. 7419, PG 91 I P.6.188, PG. 2 1S OSRA II LLC 13007 BRIGGS ROAD GPBV:800653291100000 C3 63.79' ..J 136.68' N 41'36'15' E D.B. 7403, PG. 205 j D.B. 7419, PG 91 I P.6.168, PG. 2 ~ ~ DO tiQp W ~~~ J~~~ ~ ~ Q ~~ ~ m N 15' ~o Y l~ ~~ Tha aurvey was papered wi8aut the tberre8t of a title finder and may therafare not show all e~krg eeeements or a6br pertinent facts which may affect the properly. SCALE 1 "=100' 0 100' 200' I ~o/2r~u9 ~~, PIAT SHOWING -' 0.471 ACRES & 0.041 ACRES W. M. NAULTY a DEDICATION OF LAND Lic. xo^. zo~~sj7 LOCATED EAST OF BRIGGS ROAD Z'-` ~" BERMUDA DISTRICT ~k~'O e.,oVE~O¢ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA TIeS OMWa1G M19MED AT Ti1E ra'~ ~~ rouivma~ Aow~T aua. DATE: AUGUST 5, 2009 SCALE: 1 "=30' 42E0 O~ eNa 1 PAo C,aaq, VA 13e75 Taea.su.aeao fAxew.~sl.o~se wrrw.anmar.aom REV: OCTOBER 21, 2009 ].N.:27644 903 RW3 SIEe DevNopnnrrt ~ Healdentlal ~ Infnatnlcfaln ~ Teehnolo0r DRAWN BY: JNL CHECK BY: WMN TIMMONS GROUP .••':~. CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT DELTA CHORD BEARNG CHORD C1 330.00' 142.05 72.14' 24.39'50" S 77'19'28' E 140.96' C2 270.00' 139.61' 71.40' 29'37'33' N 81'21'23' W 138.06' i `~ ~~ J v N 80' DEDICATION 0.203 ACRES ~, (8,842.68 S.F.) `~ f DSRA II LLC 13013 BRIGGS ROAD GPIN:800852457800000 D.B. 7403, PG. 205 D.B. 7419, PG. 91 P.B. 168, PG. 2 DSRA 11 LLC ~ 13001 BRIGGS ROAD DSRA II LLC GPBV: 800652129200000 13007 BRIGGS ROAD D.B.7403,PG.205 D B 7419 PG 91 GPIN:800653291100000 ~ , , , . D.B. 7403, PG. 205 ~ y • D.B. 7419, PG. 91 P.8.168, PG. 2 \ ~ a ~- 59.85 __~____ -~~ -- --------------------- / ~ ~ ' ~ -- ~' STATE ROUTE 738 9e 56' ~ . ' BRIGGS ROAD N37'23'1rw g ~ 3 ~ 30' PRESCRIPTNE RNV ----- ----- : 3 c ~~' ~ ~~~ ---------- -- -------------- ~ ~~ SCALE 1 "=30' ~P1yTH OF D 0 r'Q ' ' ~ 30 60 ~ . N/2,/o9 ~. ~ ~+~Y was ProDa-ed wlB~aR the o .- PLAT SHOWING eene6taaulleelnae-a~a~rrey ~ w, M. xnuLTY 9 0.203 ACRES 8~erafoienaahowa8exbtlnp Lic. No. 2067 DEDICATION OF LAND amemerda ar o8ier perUnerK facia wlad~ ~ a~ ~ v-ov~r• ~ ~` ~~4, LOCATED EAST OF BRIGGS ROAD 9 O BERMUDA DISTRICT ~0 SUR~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA 7MI5 OIGWa1G PRQ•ApED Arnim COUNTY PROJECT # 03-0273 71R'atasow3Ce 4260 CtOMNgf elVd I PrYite CMppa, VA 13!75 raiavarai ApQEVEDTNNOUGM DATE: AUGUST 5, 2009 SCALE: 1 °=30' ~ea.s+1.660o FAxeo<.751.o7se www.tlmmoro.oom REV: OCTOBER 21, 2009 ].N.:27644 903_RW2 31Ea D6wWOpmalt ~ Rarld«rtIN ~ In<raahuctura ~ Teehnolo0y DRAWN BY: JNL CHECK BY: WMN LINE TABLE BEARING DISTANCE S 64'59'31' E 14.08' TIMMONS GROUP:•':^+ CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT DELTA CHORD BEARING CHORD Ci 330.00' 101.48' 51.13' 17'36'55' S 81.32'12' W 101.06' C2 270.00' 30.00' 15.07 6'22'00' N 80'38'50" E 29.99' \ \ BECKWITH 6 DUNGW LLC \ EXISTING 16' 12901 BRIGGS ROAD \ DRANVAGE EASEMENT GPIN:800653043100000 \ \ A D.8.4193 PG.50 D.B. 4092, PG. 480 \ S 37'21'56' E \ 100.00' 'kya N ~ ~ DSRA II LLC ~ ' DSRA II LLC 13007 BRIGGS ROAD Ls 13001 BRIGGS ROAD N 3652899.54 ~ GPIN; 800653'191100000 GPIN: 80085'1129200000 E 11800148.25 D.B. 7403, PG. 205 O.B. 7403, PG. 205 D.B. 7419, PG. 91 D.B. 7419, PG. 91 P.B. 188, PG. 2 EXISTING 15 ~~• WATERLINE EASEMENT 60' DEDICATION D.B.4193, PG. 84 0.091 ACRES y ` `~ ~ (3,958.86 S.F.) ,` ~ c; ,,\ ~ N 3652833.11 ~ `33 a~ m E 11800087.87 '~ RNV ~~ ' 8.19 D.B. 4211, PG. 848 84.8T 28.94' - - ----- 100.00'/ N 37'21'55' W ~ ~ ~ ~ 40 35 . ~ STATE ROUTE 738 ~ ~' PRESCRIPTNE RNV BRIGGS ROAD ~ ~ ~~~ ~pLTH 0/t+ ` ffi SCALE 1 "=30' ~ W. M. NAULTY 9 0 ~~ ~~ Lic. No. 2067 ~4, ~ o 0.091 ACRES suRv DEDICATION OF LAND LOCATED EAST OF BRIGGS ROAD ~,~,,,yw~v~ev~ar~6~ol,ltn~e~lo~et~e p~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~, ~ erg ~ BERMUDA DISTRICT a ober peAlnent teas rrHch mey eRect the property. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Ti16 DRAWlliG Pq[•AR®AT THE COUNTY PROJECT ~ 03-0273 tuQr~ ~~ 4260 C1oMrgs llyd I R1noe Georpe, VA 23Q75 rovA vmaA AQ~11E0 TMAdlol DATE: AUGUST 5, 2009 SCALE: 1 "=30' Tae04.541.6600 FAxea.751.W9e www.ummar.mm REV: OCTOBER 21, 2009 ].N.:27644 903 RWI 8iEe Devalopnent ~ ReelderrWl ~ IMMtnreWn ~ T~ehnoto4y DRAWN BY: lNL CHECK BY: WMN TIMMONS GROVP .••'~'~• ~~~5 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.9.c. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Genito Road from Genito Station LP County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.045 acres along Genito Road from Genito Station LP, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.045 acres along Genito Road from Genito Station LP. This dedication is for improvements to Genito Road in conjunction with the development of Genito Towns. Approval is recommended. District: Clover Hill Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No QS~~126 VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Genito Road from Genito Station LP N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities , W ~- E S 1 I~cl -666.61 Re t ~!®®~~ • ~ o 0 ~~ 'I O ~ m g~~ ~ ~ o ~' o O~ V 0 4~ ~~ ,~ a a $~ e Zi 1\ti 2 O~°4, \ moms q0~~ ~a L~~ e He In a=tiZ 2 ti ~~e~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ° a ~~~ ~?2 ro 2 Igo ° ~~ ~ I .~ ~~ ~1 _r ~~ ~. _s ~ O >r ~ I ~ / / / I / 1 m vj ql pp ~ ~ Hi ~Fn o~ ~ v ` 1 ~ ? 9 6 ~n4 ~nq~a 1 . ~y ~'~'~ vim: 1 \ rnno \ \ °°a s` ~ ~ \ ~ 1 ? \ 1 m n ` i \ ` ~, \\ \~ 4~jr 4\ \ \ ~l ~ ~, 4 \~~ ~~~ ~~ 1 °v2 \ \~ $ \ a b ~ ~~\ 1 ~~ N-v,QFS~ 1~~\ I ~ N I ~ ( qc I ~ ~ \\\ \ ~ 1 - ~. p fc \ S ~I °~~ ~s WS `r I ~ 9~s`n'I'r I 6 ~ \ 1 \~ \ \\ \\ \ \ a I rir~ V \ ~ 1 1 'rl 1 \\\\~l n o~ m~ m~ ,~~ i N? q 0 ao ~ti ~~ q C" ea Y ~y / 4~ /~ M \'~i' ~ I I / ~ /~ %~' / (e~' I ~/ // 0 ~~ ~Q~Q ~K Ci ,o ~, I \ n \1,\_ 2~ w ~ \ v^+ b ~~~ q~ e~^~ 1 I~ .~ \ ~ 1 \ - ~ 1 v ~ \ V~` ~ i y ~~ o? a ~ ~~-~ ~. L~~1 ~#. _ ~ ~ ~ 1~ 1 ~~ i ~ yV l N ii~,~ ~v~~/ 1l ~fI ~ I 1 q I ~ \ 11 ~ G~ '~~sLtl ~n I 1 I ~ 11 \\ \ v / ° °; I I 1 1 ~ 1 ~1 I,~ \ \ \ ~l O ~~ as 1 I 11 II ~ _ I I I I `e °: \ II III C~`~, \ \\ 1 \ 1 ~ 11m \ \ ~ y ~ "' e ~ v i m I 1 °j~ r/~ I~Y~ ~' 3 n ~ ~ 1 ~ , \ ~, pq ~° ~ ~ 11 4 \\~ m ~1~ '. 1 b Fr" ~ 1 1 I I , is ~` v2 o a i I lj -JI 1 1 ~+'n' I I r ~ ~ y ~ \ pp ~. yppQ1 '(_,, ~G° T p ~ 1 \~ 1 1 `gy I ~ II II II 1 1 2 L --I 1 11 ~~1~ I 1 F ~p 1 I I 1 1 1 F $ V~ 1\ I e 1 1 ~~ 1 q ~~ ~ 11 II 11 11 q 11 ~ \ 11 Ili 1 ~~ ~ 11 11 F $ ~ I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 \I ~ ~ 11 1 I 11 `" 1 ~ S d i q~ q 1 I I 1 1 1 ar 1 1 1 11 ~ vv ~ ,y m I 1 ^ I I X \~ 1 11 1 //11 // 1 I 11 ~ 1 .. 1 11 1' 1 11 u~'1` w J 11 11 ` ° ~ T` 3 n ~'1 / / m a I I / 0 1 1 11 11 1 1 11 II 1. ; /b. ~ can 1 1 /~ ~ a ~ 11 11 ~` ~o o ~, hj \ NM; ` I /~ // 03 o m^,F 11 1\ 1 111 /~ ~oY \~ II// 11// eU~~. a~~l 1 11 11 11 ~~a'\ \ ~Tr n ) ~^ L n~ l 1 1 1 1 !' rjB / 1 / 1 ~^ ti~ n l 1 1 1 1 \~~~ // I/ I v n l r ~ 11 11 ma'r' / P ~ yy 11 ~1`_L~ / /I loy 1 1 \ / / I b 1 11 1 I Co / / I 1 11 \ 4 yoK~ ~~ "/ / ~ tiu~ ~ ~mi~ o~~e'; I 1\ m; ` I I m ~g W~ \ a 'd'aily'.'" ~ ~~ v I nw,c ~ ~~~~ Ylr \~ i ~~o~?o ~~~~ I I rJ ~ ~ t- ~o_aT ~66~ a `~ ~\~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ a ~~~~ ~ `w ~~~ ,,}} {yl '~1,,~ f.a ~ ~ 1 ~ r _ _ b 11 ~ G ~~ J 1 Z I N ~ /: 47• /,~~4 ` I IN N ~ 4 S Q I, 1 ~ I ~ v tr 1 e 1 I ~ ' y .~r yy~ p Zi7 t 1 11 111 4 ~ I ~~$ x a ~ 1 1 ` j~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 \ I X' ~ ~~ \ \ \ O ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PLAT KNOWING TWO 18' DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, TWO VARIABLE WIDTH VDOT SLOPE 6 DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, ~ a ~ ~ i F ~ ;} ~~ 3 ~ ~!' ~ j ~F3 ! p P O ~ o A o ~ ~ r B 9 ~ ~ ~ m TWO VARIABLE WIDTH TEMPORARY CONSTiiIICTION EASEMENTS, A 10' TEMPORARY CONKTFIUCTION EASEMENT, AND 0 071 ACRE OF LAND T 5g f ~ ~ ~p g~~ ? ~yy~ 1 ~ y N ~ ~ -i ~ ~' . O BE DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFlE ~ X a ~ $~ 8 gg G ~g r ~ 8 LD, ALL LYING NORTH OF GENITO ROAD CLOVERMILLDISTRICT A F F v + rg CHESTEFIELD COUNTY, VIFGINIA .+ V V ®~.~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.9.d. Subject: Acceptance of Parcels of Land Along Courthouse Road from Hyles Baptist Church County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Accept the conveyance of parcels of land containing a total of 0.263 acres along Courthouse Road from Hyles Baptist Church, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of parcels of land containing a total of 0.263 acres along Courthouse Road from Hyles Baptist Church. This dedication is a requirement of zoning case 02SN0262. Approval is recommended. DIStrICt: Dale Preparers John W. Harmon Title_ Real Prope Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ~~~~~~ VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of Parcels of Land Along Cow•tliouse Road from H•yles Baptist Chw•ch Rt 288 Newbys Bridge Rd TE~~ t~C ~.Z6:i ACr+~ t0 be DeciCat@d CQ~~~ ~$~ ~ o~ Pocahontas State Park ~a N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W ' - -E S 1 ncl - t,ODOtet ®~~~~ ~ _ _ coM~uoNwEALrH of wRC1Nw ~'4r1S.,M,~_ GPIN /752664969100000 ~~~ D.B. 298, PAGE 201 (1e0~J I ~I~~J ~~ ~~; ~ ~ PARCEL 3 I ~ (19~ 88) ~~~~ v~~~ /761l67GOd18000G0~ ! ~ ~~~ m z ? QB fD~ AICB fe;f I I ~ ar 1 RElI. 1.928 AgiES j I ~ ~w~ o j ~: 1 o ~ ~ I ,~,,,' ~ ~~~ ~I ~ PARCEL 1 ~g ~~ ~ I _ ~ ni FN'LE5 ~IP/RSl G~NA~iGl P I REAI. 2721 AQRES ~\ r N 1 r I v I ~ 1~ `\ ~ 1 ~ 1 I ~ i I ~ \ o~ \ t,+ ~ ~ I ~1 ~ ~ !I~ 1 ~: ~ ~Z ~ ~ ~ N=13670407.89 $ 1 y ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ E= 111758167.04 j I «~ o+ ~ -+ ~ AS LOCA/ED - ' ~- - - 1(.~O p~j.. C3 1 N ~ ~-c 10 14j9 :-:;~~`? 1135' ~ a, C NUMBER DIRECTION D/S7ANCE ~'~.~:.. ~~~ L 1 N10'S3'22' E 32.54' ~ ~' ~~:;;~ L2 N09'20'26 f 30.11 ' f /3~ . 1~ ~ ass?~~ ib 100 0 100 200 ~~~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ `~~; ~ - . ~D ~ SCALE 1' = 100 FEET fir. ~' ~j Pq NUMBER DELTA CHORD BEARING TANGENT RADIUS LENGTH CHORD C1 05'42'07" N63'S8'14"W 43.87 880.89 87.66 87.63 C2 00'07'15" N61'03'33"W 7.70 7294.67 15.40 15.40 C3 01'10'40" N60'24'35"W 74.98 7294.67 149.96 149.96 C4 01'06 Z 1 " N59' 16'05 "W 70.40 7294.67 140.79 140.79 N= 3670595.48 E= 11757831.69 THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED VITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT AND THEREFORE DOES NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE ALL ENCUMBRANCES ON THE PROPERTY. PLAT SHOI/ING THREE PARCELS CONTAINING 0.269 ACRES TO BE DEDICATED ON THE SOUTHERN LINE OF COURTHOUSE ROAD IN THE DALE DISTRICT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. VIRGINIA o~~$SLTH o~ Df4' ~~ r ERWIN J. FANO ua Na z427 `'"o au..s't°` POT15, YINT~R end ASSOC7ATlSS, P.C. 6a81assra, Laced Stu~vieyorx, Load Plaanera pate: 10/14/09 3620 Courthows Road Rtcbmoad a 89858 Scale: 1' = 100' ,,,y,,-Tom (804) 7~-897'8 J.N. 09IO-O2 ®~ Cl~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.9.e. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along Genito Road from Shockley, LLC County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.026 acres along Genito Road from Shockley, LLC, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.026 acres along Genito Road from Shockley, LLC. This dedication is for improvements to Genito Road in conjunction with the development of Genito Towns. Approval is recommended. District: Clover Hill Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No 000132 VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of a Pai•ccl of Land Along Gcnito Road from 5Lockley, LLC 5 U 3 ~ r R R oy ~~o ~ Q~ 4 U F a ~a ~,~ R ,~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~, ~ ~ a 4~ ~~, ~~ p~ N ~~ ~~ d a 9 TI G A~~- GIN O ~ ~d Qom` Q- 5 v 44 `~G ~ ~ ~ zo ~~- Q 3 g }~ ~S z U N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W -E 5 1 hcl - fi66.6f 4e t J'. ) MT ) ~ `au~ :ti~o6SCm~SC'vC .. ..a y3o88.~,&RaL'RB~ v o ,~ o -. ~ S ~~ ffi ~ ~ 1 O S o'Om ~ / pq ` ~ ~a~YaY ~~ ~~t~k Y~ ~ ~ $ 1~ v ~ ~ ti 11 ~` ~ ~ U= ~~ I nA seam .`l `s ff ~~ I l1'1~ In T ~~ ~ ~a \ oho ~ y / ~~~ aa. A w• w~\ ICJ 1 i w~~ $4 M /' I e~ ~ a '~ ~!~ I V AV e~~~ 11Ai // / b ~ `~ I ~ I ~~ ~ AV o /~y. / o m~mn I~ ~ q~~q'~ofssifc I\~~1 \\\ \ \ m~ j'~l '~~ e~'oA~ I Jva~ 4~ ri a9 S6N~ I \\~y\ \\ ~w2 n / / / .l° a~ti~ _ _ Lys e~~1Ji I \ \ \\~ ti~ ` / i % ~ tQo iii ,~U a m h 1 ~• \~ \~ •.~\ \ ~ q~~ ~ III JOk. ~~ li/ 1 V \ (1\ \~ \ \ ~ / ~~ ~~~~ eye I 1 1 1 la .~ ~1,1n \\ \ ,~ JJJ ti ~~ a O II o°j• I II 1 3~ 1 f ~ \\ \ ~ ~ ~~ mF I 11 1 m 1 Q~ \, 1\ \ ~ ~~~~1 .aa I 1 1 1 '^°'. 1 ~~ 11 a \\ \ ~ in ~I I1 --arc 1 1 .~r°~ ~p~ ~ 1 ^~ ~N p~glgc : I N ti~ t ~ r 1 ~o~~~ , ~11 b~"' \\~~\1 I 1^ z ~ ~ =~c~ ^~i ~~~i ro ~= 1-JII 11 1 ti~•n r 1 •C -1 \ ~+~ \, I~S"o Y ~ v 4 l Q ~` I 1 1 1~ ~~ ~ 1 \ 1\ d ~' ~1-~1 1 b ~$• L~ a ~ _y// \ +~ j 1 1 1 11 ~~ ~~1~1/1 L. -1 11 1 ~1~' 1 11 III J~\ F a 4'7/ ~ ~~r N 11 'I 11 1 v 111 11 a~ l 1 I•, ,$ ~/ p ~ I I 1 11 ~~ ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ 1 1 G ° A 1 I 1 1 1 \I ` `/~ ~ y 11 II 11 11 ~ a ~ 11 \111 \\I 21 1 ,l V / ~ ~ n I I 1 11 r 1 11 1 11 11 ~ EC; ~ iyl / ~ 1 I 1 ~ I 11 u ~ 3 1 I 1 I 1 o m v, ~ 11"Il //~ // 11 111 1\ II ri 1 N u~ N'3'~ ` o~ ~ n I I /~/ m 1 111 11 1. ~ 11 z i `Lto~~2` 1 /~ 1 1\ 1 v !~ /~/3 ? ~ ~~~ 11 I/ / vNrn O ~ 111 11 1 11 1N r ``/Jj4 //~ \~ ~ ~ I /~ // 030 ~^,F 11 I1 1 11 lu ~ // Porgy 1 / 1 / ~o~ qy 4. 1\ 1 111 1 q ~ ~~ 3a\ \ ~o ~ . ~, n ~l I \ 1,^~ ?~'~'J~ /// II //11 ~^~_ 11 f~\11 111 \111 11 ``' ai ` ~ ~ / / I y° 1 11 _ \ 1 i2CS C ys $ // /~ I y " 11 111` 1, \\ 11 w ~~v~~~¢ CO / I 1 11 1 1 F~ a~i / I ~ ~ 1 11 I 3' }ate ' / / W ~ s'?s1i `. 11 1\ \ 1 tp Q d ~ m/ m < I I m v~ ~ 1\ 11 ~ ~?E I ~ ~ ti n. ~ \ I ~i ~ \\ PLAT SHOWING TWO 16 DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, TWO 8 7 p O 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ U VARIABLE WIDTH VDOT SLOPE i DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~~~ Qq~ ~ ~ TWO VMIABLE WIDTH TEMPORARY CONSTi111CT10N g5 ~ j y tC ~`-' O ~ 6 ~ EASEMENTS,AIC TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT, f~~~ ~§~~ ~g~~ ~~~ N 8 -~ & ~ ~ ~ ~ a'oF cH'EST~ERFlE~i.o, ui ne~ic N°ED1oRrAH OF GENITO Ro~AO ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~~( ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ .. CLOVERHILL DISTRICT '~ B CHESTEFIELD COUNTY VIRGINIA = iii C~~~~ 3~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 3 AGENDA ~, Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.10. Subject: Transfer of Funds and Authorization to Proceed for Eppes Falls Road Paving and Route 360 Eastbound Lane Extension at Ashlake Parkway Projects County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ,~j Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to: 1) transfer $240,000 to the Eppes Falls Road Paving Project, and $85,000 to the Route 360 Eastbound Lane Extension at Ashlake Parkway Project from the General Road Improvement Account; 2) authorize the County Administrator to enter into the customary VDOT/County/consultant/contractor, design, right-of-way acquisition, environmental permitting and/or construction agreements, acceptable to the County Attorney, for the projects; and 3) authorize advertisement and award of construction contracts to the lowest responsible bidders, up to $240,000 for the Eppes Falls Road Paving Project, and $85,000 for the Route 360 Eastbound Lane Extension at Ashlake Parkway Project. Summary of Information: Mrs. Durfee requested staff to bring forward this item to provide for the paving of the 1.6 mile section of Eppes Falls Road from River Road to the end of state maintenance and the westward extension of the eastbound lane of Route 360 at Ashlake Parkway. (Continued on next page) Preparers R.J. McCracken Title: Director of Transportation agen722 Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # QO®~ ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA Summary of Information: (continued) Eppes Falls Road is a gravel road that serves approximately 24 residents and is the access for the Eppington Plantation. Mrs. Durfee has asked that the road be paved. It is estimated that the road can be paved-in-place for $240,000. There are approximately 12 miles of state maintained gravel roads in the county. The eastbound traffic queue at the Route 360/Ashlake Parkway intersection extends past the existing through lane. If the outside eastbound lane of Route 360 is extended, traffic flow through the intersection will be improved. The estimated cost is $85,000. Recommendation: If the Board chooses to pursue the projects, the following actions should be taken: 1) Transfer $240,000 for the Eppes Falls Road Paving Project, and transfer $85,000 for the Route 360 Eastbound Lane Extension at Ashlake Parkway, from the General Road Improvement Account; and 2) Authorize the County Administrator to enter into the customary VDOT/County/consultant/contractor, design, right-of-way acquisition, environmental permitting and/or construction agreements, acceptable to the County Attorney, for the projects; and 3) Authorize advertisement and award of construction contracts to the lowest responsible bidders, up to $240,000 for the Eppes Falls Road Paving Project and $85,000 for the Route 360 Eastbound Lane Extension at Ashlake Parkway project. District: Matoaca CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS In° AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Budget and Management Comments: The Board is requested to authorize staff to proceed with the design, right- of-way acquisition, and enter into customary VDOT and environmental permit agreements for the Eppes Falls Road Paving Project and the Route 360 Eastbound Lane Extension at Ashlake Parkway. This item further requests that the Board transfer $240,000 for the Eppes Falls Road Paving Project, and $85,000 for the Route 360 Eastbound Lane Extension at Ashlake Parkway for a total transfer of $325,000 from the General Road Improvement Account and authorize the award of construction contracts to the lowest responsible bidders, up to $240,000 and $85,000 for the two respective projects. Sufficient funding exists in the General Road Improvement Account to transfer $325,000 to these projects. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Mana ement ~~~~ ~~ Eppes Falls Road Paving y v ~~ 4Q ~~ Project Limits Properties with lrnprov~ments 0 700 1,400 2,800 Feet vsmdhtNCMiM roadsleppes falls road agentla 77-9-09 V ®~ .' Route 360 Eastbound Lane Extension at Ashlake Parkway .' vsmcnuxrseaee wsn~ake 11-10-09 0 230 480 920 Feet CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.11. Subject: Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a Sixteen-Foot Water Easement Across the Property of Kohl's Department Stores, Incorporated County Administrator's Comments• County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a portion of a 16' water easement across the property of Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. Summary of Information: Kohl's Department Store, Inc. has requested the vacation of a portion of a 16' water easement across its property as shown on the attached plat for the development of Kohl's Store #10309. A new easement will be dedicated. This request has been reviewed by the Utilities Department. Approval is recommended. District: Clover Hill Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # CEO®'~ ~~ VICINITY SKETCH Request to Quitclaun a Portion of a Sixteen Foot Vti'ater Easement Across the Pi•opei•ty of Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. G ~O ~~ r ~ D ~ Cfi ~ ~~. ~~~ td `.~~ a ~~ LOTH TP R~ th GT C SGT ~L~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ f ~ 1NT~R ANON L DR ~~ gy T 0 ~~~ ~ ~ D~ p p BAR GT ~G ~~ to G~ U ~ 4 OUT LAKF $ 0 CO ST G ~P~GN ~ G~ G ~ [~J Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W `- E S I Iwl - fi66.67 1Pe t (~'~®~ ~~ it ~~ ~ ~~ ~yy y/pd ~' i ~ b y ~ ~ ON7b AIM4~~ ru ~un~ I I I ~ ~ ~ Y'~ F.9B6 a pp ~+ LChJIJJ /~~ I I 4 \ t~ I I I I ~ff SS~~ I I I I ~~ "b RI! ~~ ~~~ I I ~~ I I ~~ ~~ ~~ ~o~ y$q II II ~~~~;...a ffi o G 1 ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ I I ~ I ~ J ~q II I I i a I I I ~ WN~M may( I ~ ~ J I I I I ~ I ~ ~' : -iMC Md ~ II II I ~ ~ I . ~~~ ~~ I ;I I; I ~ , I i ~~ I I I I ~~ _~ ~ i „~ I I I III c 8~ ~ 1 1 ~/ F-T-1 ;~ ~ ~ II I ~ ~~~ ~ ~~1 ~ ~tSq~lt ~ R I ti I~!~ ~II II I ~ ~~R V I 1 i I I$ ~Ij III I ~'a $~y ~ ~.t ~I I N I~ ~1!!LL 1111'"' 1 I g o`~J ; II li i I ; ~ I ~ ~ I~ I~ I~~p I II II I ~ q y ~~ n ° 't I~ j I~ I~_~~~ \\~ \~~ CD / In~i~ I ~ ~ ~ I III ICI ''' ~ o y~ V III ~ \ \ I I IIII ~~II \ I \ I I I I I ~ I ~~ \~ ~ ~,~ ~, ~I N I I 61 1 Ili Et~~ w ~~ 14~~ I O S I I ~~ I II I ~~ w~~ .~~ I III I 9` I ~ I pp~ ~ $ ~ ~ Qgg~ ~ II ~ ~ 9 I ~Y I ~2 CD \ a, IC Y~J `o~ ~~ ~ 2 \ ~ o ~X {. \ o ~ ~~~ A~ c~ ~ gyp q i~ 6 O p ~~~~x1p• ~ ~~2` /!i 4 Ab`~ 7~ y ~U O~ ~ KH~m,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ A'AT 9'A7~N" A Riq°bSfD 16' w11E7g/IL~ mp$~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ FAS~7OV1CAC591~cnEtMrlsA~o~ES7~a~Eio ~~~8 g~ d ~~&~ ~~a9 ~~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ' e ~ s AE ~ s~ ~Ann° A ~~av o~ A i 3 g8 9 ~ ~ ~~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 16'Wlh%/IEFAS~]ENl7D~111011fD ~Ei yy~~ ~~aP ~ ~ .. apav xu asnecr g~ ? aesm~no cnunr, waalw ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ g ~ . ~~+ q V'®~~°~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.12.a. Subject: Transfer $4,440 from the Midlothian District Improvement Fund to the Department of Utilities to Pay the Connection Fee to Install an Irrigation System in a Median Located Within VDOT Right-of-Way on Riverton Ridge Drive County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: G/ Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to transfer $4,440 from the Midlothian District Improvement Fund to the Department of Utilities to pay the connection fee to install an irrigation system in a median located within VDOT right-of-way on Riverton Ridge Drive. Summary of Information: Mr. Gecker has requested the Board to transfer $4,440 from the Midlothian District Improvement Fund to the Department of Utilities to pay the connection fee for the installation of an irrigation system in a median located within VDOT right-of-way on Riverton Ridge Drive. The County paid a portion of the cost to have landscaping installed in this median in 2004. The median serves as the entrance way to three public facilities including two schools and a park and the signage within the median references these facilities. The requested funds will be used to pay the utilities connection fee so that an irrigation system can be installed to keep the current vegetation properly watered. The County may use public funds for landscaping Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director Bud et and Mana ement 82681.1 Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # Cc~®~.~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA which improves public property and benefits the driving public generally. The County may not use public funds for landscaping property if the predominant purpose of the landscaping is to improve the entrance to a private subdivision or to improve the appearance of a subdivision. This request was originally made by the Riverton Civic Association (RCA). The County cannot make donations to homeowners' associations. The County can, however, use public funds to improve and maintain public property for the benefit of public facilities. The $4,440 can be transferred to the Department of Utilities to pay a portion of the connection fee. The RCA will pay the remaining $1,200 and will pay the water bill. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. ~~©~~4 Page 1 DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. 1. What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? Riverton Civic Association (RCA) 2. If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application.) The RCA's purpose is to promote the best interests of the Riverton community and its residents to promote neighborhood appearance, safety, feeling of belonging, communication and to represent the community in matters with developers and jurisdiction (bylaws attached). 3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? 54,440 (to be paid directly to the utilities department) 4. Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. In 2002, the RCA, in conjunction with the Chesterfield County school district, erected a front entrance median strip complete with signage, garden, grass and trees. Since that time the RCA has been solely responsible for operations and upkeep at an annual cost of $8,000. We would like to have an irrigation system installed to keep the grass green and flowers in the garden alive during the grueling summer months. We have in our budget funds to install the irrigation system, on-going water expense and an additional $1,200 to go toward the county connection fee of $5,640. We request District Improvement Funds to fund the remainder of the county connection fee of $4,440. If approved, the amount would be paid directly to the utilities department. 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? Yes- the Chesterfield utilities department; the requested funds are to be distributed directly to the utilities department. 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? RCA will fund $1,200 of the $5,640 connection fee plus the cost of the irrigation installation and on-going water expense and system maintenance. C~~~~.~5 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Yes No x Is the organization non-profit? Yes x No Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes x No 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? Riverton Civic Association P.O Box1132 Midlothian. VA 23113 9. What is the telephone number, fax number, a-mail address of the applicant? 804-897-6261 (phone) mcollins0112Cc~comcast. net Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairman/director or vice-chairman of the organization. Signature President Title (if signing on behalf of an organization) Mark Collins Printed Name 1 ~~1 t~ (0°l Date ~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.12.b. Subject: Transfer of $6,143 in Midlothian District Improvement Funds to the Chesterfield County School Board to Purchase Two Dell Laptop Computers, 16 CD Players, whiteboards, Mathematics Kits and Literacy Instructional Books for Robious Elementary School County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Transfer $6,143 in Midlothian District Improvement Funds to the Chesterfield County School Board to purchase two Dell laptop computers, 16 CD players, whiteboards, mathematics kits and literacy instructional books for Robious Elementary School. Summary of Information: Supervisor Gecker has requested that the Board transfer $6,143 in Midlothian District Improvement Funds to the Chesterfield County School Board to purchase two Dell Latitude laptop computers, 16 CD players for the "books on tape" and basic music instruction programs, whiteboards, "mathematics manipulative" kits and literacy instructional books for Robious Elementary School. The Board can legally transfer public funds to the School Board to purchase .capital equipment and instructional materials which will be used for a public educational purpose. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget & Management 0425:82677.1 Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # (~®~~~'~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. Q0~1 ~~ DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. 1. What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? Doua Tope and Andrea Beachv (parents) Kathy Logsdon (PTA President) in full partnership with the Robious Elementarv Principal Anne O'Toole 2. If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application. Robious Elementary School Q~ ~' ~Y 3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? 17 8.06 ~ ~~~ 4. Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. Robious Elementarv is a worthy recipient of these funds as the leadership has a long history of utilizing County resources to improve the Midlothian District's test scores as well as placing the District at the forefront of education as one of V irginia's first Expeditionary Learning (EL) schools and as a National B lue Ribbon school Robious is in need of substantial PTA funding for EL professional education and materials to execute specific grade level expeditions The PTA has committed to a substantial amount of fundraisina this year to ensure that Robious continues as a National EL School that serves as a role model for new Chesterfield EL programs, which is in the best interest of Chesterfield County and our district The significant EL support provided has resulted in other basic needs exceedi na PTA fundraisina capabilities Such basic needs include: two laptops to be s hared by "all" Robious faculty/staff• walkie talkies to secure our children in the face of an emergency' CD players/cassette recorders to assist 1...L ___ .- __`_i_ _~~ grade math students that have an aggressive curriculum without the proper tools to deepen their learning: and textbooks for teachers to implement the 2009-2010 School Management Plan in the area student assessment practices See attachment A and B for a synopsis of requirements, the purpose and reguirement for each of the specific purchases and product specific information and pricing 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? The Robious Elementarv School is part of the Chesterfield County Public School system. While this request is being submitted by the PTA it has been coordinated with the Principal Anne O'Toole who can validate the reguests attached In the event that the funds are approved they will be directed through the appropriate Chesterfield County government organizations to the Robious Elementarv (not the PTA) 63533.1 Page 1 Q®~~~~ 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? Unit costs have been provided for each of the aurchases and Robious will purchase the quantity of items that are aaaroved. For examale if the book request is not fully funded Robious will purchase the quantity of books that are funded The same would aaaly to the other requests While we know tha# County resources are limited we urge You to consider the merits of our requests based on: 1) the lack of twawav communication as a serious security risk to our children,, which can be addressed with $11 025 (a cost of $16 per child)' 2) Robious Special Education students and those below arade level face a uniquely difficult experience as they are surrounded by some of the highest achievers in the countyIsla#e• 3) obtaining grants/external fundma for excellence is far more challenaina than for a struggling school• however maintaining or imarovina that aertormance becomes more difficult as technology instructional materials and techniques become outdated 3) Robious has a significant number of advanced students due to it's aertormance levels that should not be held back due to lack of materials such as ebooks. CD mstru+ction, and math maniaulatives• and 4) the requests are small in the rq and scheme as white boards can be provided to each student for only 79 cents Robious Elementary teachers and students work extremely hard and both deserve basic technology and materials. We are not asking for laptops or CD Players for each classroom (which makes sense). but 2 laatoas and 16 CD Players to share across 68 faculty and staff members 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Yes No X Is the organization non-profit? Yes X No Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes X No 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? 2900 Calcutt Drive Midlothian, VA 23113 9. What is the telephone number, fax number, a-mail address of the applicant? Applicant: Phone (804) 464-1122 and Email k logsdon(c"r?veriaon.net Principal Anne O'Toole: Phone (804) 378-2500 and Email anne otoc~le~ccpsnet.,r~et Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairmanldirector orvice-chairman of the organization. 63533.1 Signature ~' President, Robious Elementary School PTA Title {if signing on behalf of an organization} Kathy Logsdon Printed Name September 23, 2009 Date Page 2 ~~~~ ~~ ,, .~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.12.c. Subject: Transfer $800 from the Matoaca District Improvement Fund to the School Board to Purchase cheerleading Uniforms for Tomahawk Creek Middle School County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Lj Board Action Requested: Transfer $800 from the Matoaca District Improvement Fund to the School Board to purchase cheerleading uniforms for Tomahawk Creek Middle School. Summary of Information: Supervisor Durfee has requested the Board transfer $800 from the Matoaca District Improvement Fund to the School Board to purchase cheerleading uniforms for Tomahawk Creek Middle School. The County can give money to the School Board to purchase capital equipment to be used for school programs. The uniforms will be owned by the School Board and will become apart of the School Board's inventory of property. The School Board must purchase the uniforms in accordance with the Virginia Public Procurement Act. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director. Budget and Management 0425:82678.1 Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ~~~~ ~~ Z0'd i86 30Idd0 NIkiW b0:£S 6002-6~-100 DISTRICT IMPFiOV~M~NT FUNDS APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virg'Inia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. ~ . What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? ~arrl~.h~l,~k ('.rpik >N~aa1r ,~~~nn 1 ~%.o.~.lo..Jo.. 2. If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application. ~ ~~ / ~ {~~ _ ~~ 3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? ~ g QQ, 0iO 4. Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. ~ m_n..~r~_y~J j be. ~_S~p_~,nf 0-'- n -„~ icn--fy rms ~ C ri n e sa ~l J ~ 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? 83533.1 Page 1 ~~~~ ~~ b020'd ZL9Zb6Lb08 S 3 ~I~1dHtiW01 tS:~Z 6002-6z-100 ~~ 3~Idd0 NIkiW b0:£Z 6002-6Z-1a0 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? ~ 1.eGt,r -Fv o ~ Y ~.ho~,~ r~ w u..n i fa rrr~ ~Tj.- i s W i 1 I b Ye y i c r .,,._, -the rPrna;na~r of -~,~ ~nc-/- a.~ .~~-Ferms 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Yes No ~_ Is the organization non-profit? Yes No Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes No 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? -Tn rY,u Ina.,.1 K ('x~r K SC oo 1l~O0 I~~tY~,i{,n 'QjA ~ bap _ 111 U_ ~ I!'T"i 11Q n . ~/ ~ ~.~ ~, a..~. 9. What is the telephone number, fax number, a-mail address of the applicant? _I`;~b4) ~qy-~~7` Loren _ s+e r n, ~e c cps n~+. ne+ Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president vice-president chairman/director or vice-chairman of the organizatllon. / - Signature .1•d.• TC M S C,I~r~ r i n Title (if slgning on beh of an organization) Soren S'-~eiml~ Printed Name ~o-a9- _ Date 63533.1 Page 2 Q V0i£0'd ZL9Zb6L~08 S 3 ~I~1t1Ht1W01 tiS:£Z 6002-6Z-1a0 b0'd b0 ' d ~k1101 :L6 30 I dd0 N I kiW b0:£T 6002-6z-100 The Tomahawk Creek Middle School cheerleaders have been fundraising for over a year. The cheerleaders sponsor the concession stand at Tomahawk Creek for girls basketball season and boys basketball season. They also have sold concessions at the three Back to School Nights, 6~' grade orientation, and several cross country meets. The cheerleaders have sold TCMS pads, magnets, and spirit cups. ~©~~.~~$ b0ib0 ' d ZL9Zb6Lb08 S 3 ~I~1kiHtiW01 i S:£ Z 6002-6Z-100 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ,~, Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 8.D.12.d. Subiect: Transfer of $40,000 from the Clover Hill District Improvement Fund to the Transportation Department to Apply Slurry Seal on Portions of Smoketree Drive and Gordon School Road County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Transfer $40,000 in Clover Hill District Improvement Funds to Transportation Department to apply slurry seal on portions of Smoketree Drive and Gordon School Road. Summary of Information: Chairman Warren has requested the transfer of $40,000 in Clover Hill District Improvement Funds to the Transportation Department to pay the cost of applying slurry seal on 0.4 miles of Smoketree Drive and 0.3 miles of Gordon School Road and restriping the newly-sealed portions. Slurry seal is a pavement sealant that protects the underlying pavement and provides better traction than untreated pavement. Smoketree Drive and Gordon School Road are public roads. The Board can legally transfer public funds to a County department to improve public property for a public purpose including public roads. For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. Preparers Allan Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management 0425:82778.1 Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # Page 1 DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. 1. What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? of Mr. Warren 2 If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application.) Transportation Dept 3. What is the amount of funding you are seeking? Stan Newcomb on behalf Chesterfield County 540,000 4. Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. Funds are being requested to slurry seal 0.4 mile of Smoketree Drive and 0.3 mile of Gordon School Road. The funds will also be used for traffic control and striping. The funds will be used on state maintained, public right-of-way. 5. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? 6. If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations .will provide the remainder of the funding? Transportation Dept Page 2 7. If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Yes ^ Is the organization non-profit? Yes Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes 8. What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? PO Box 40; Chesterfield, VA 23838 9. What is the telephone number; fax number, e-mail address of the applicant? 748-1037; newcombs@chesterfield.gov No No ^ No ^ Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairman/director or vice-chairman of the organization. /J • J 1~.~(.tAJ Signature Engineering Supervisor Title (if signing on behalf of an organization) Stan B. Newcomb Printed Name November16, 2009 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 "" AGENDA Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 9.A. Su. bLct: Developer Water and Sewer Contracts County Administrator's Comments• County Administrator: U/ Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors has authorized the County Administrator to execute water and/or sewer contracts between County and Developer where there are no County funds involved. The report is submitted to Board members as information. Summary of Information: The following water and sewer contracts were executed by the County Administrator: 1. Contract Number: 08-0089 Project Name: Magnolia Green - Sanitary Sewer Extension to Section M, N and O Developer: 6801 Woolridge Road - Mosley TRS, LLC Contractor: Piedmont Construction Company Incorporated Contract Amount: Wastewater Improvements - $113,350.02 District: Matoaca Preparers William O. Wright Title: Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # C~~1 ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information: (Continued) 2. Contract Number: 08-0108 Project Name: Harper's Mill Parkway, Phase II Developer: Oakbridge Corporation Contractor: Piedmont Construction Company, Inc. Contract Amount: Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - District: Matoaca $177,120.75 $24,080.10 ~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, Zoos Item Number: s.6. Subject: Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects, District Improvement Funds, and Lease Purchases County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Acceptance of attached report. Summary of Information: Preparers James J. L. Stegmaier Title: County Administrator Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No # C~~Q~~'~ Board Meeting Date 07/01 /09 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GENERAL FUND BALANCE November 18, 2009 Descrption FY2010 Beginning Budgeted Balance * Pending outcome of FY2009 audit results Amount Balance $53,495,000 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS November 18, 2009 Board Meeting Date Descri tp ion Amount Balance FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2008 4/9/2008 FY2009 Budgeted Addition $17,810,300 $22,647,488 4/9/2008 FY2009 Capital Projects (16,792,400) 5,855,088 6/24/2009 Tax Collection Customer Service project (244,400) 5,610,688 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2009 4/9/2009 FY2010 Budgeted Addition $13,946,400 $19,557,088 4/9/2009 FY2010 Capital Projects (13,946,400) 5,610,688 ®~~ ~~ ~ ~ A i N ~--~ ~--~ O ~ 00 O O O C L ~ ~ N y a ~O ~ 69 M 00 C~ ~D 69 ~O l~ b9 O~ N M 69 ~ ~ V ~ R ~ ~ O AG1 ~ O "C O O ~ oM0 ' ~ O ~O o0 ~ a~+ ~ O~ N ~ O ~ ~ .~ ~ "'~ Q z F~ r F'y y '+-' y A t~ ~ O O 'n N ~n ~ ~o 'n ' N p ~ W~ F~~ yy + QI G i ~ p O O O O O O F„ z o ~, N ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ o i/'i ~ (~L~ •y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..-i M ~ L I~ Q Q VJ L ~ i ~ _ l~ O N OHO O O~ N O O O N 00 N ' i. y O~ M o0 o0 M ~ 01 O y. 6A a, U :9 R ~ _ 3 ~ y ~ ea p h ~ ~ D ~ :C ~ 7 U A 0.1 U ~ Prepared by Accounting Department October 31, 2009 Date Bean 04/99 O1/O1 03/03 03/04 10/04 12/04 12/04 OS/OS 05/06 08/07 SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES APPROVED AND EXECUTED Original Description Amount Public Facility Lease -Juvenile Courts Project $16,100,000 Certificates of Participation - Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Certificates of Participation -Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation Certificates of Participation -Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Cloverleaf Mall Redevelopment Project Energy Improvements at County Facilities Energy Improvements at School Facilities Certificates of Participation -Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and Equipping; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Certificates of Participation -Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and Equipping; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Certificates of Participation -Building Expansion/Renovation, Equipment Acquisition TOTAL APPROVED AND EXECUTED PENDING EXECUTION Description None 13,725,000 6,100,000 21,970,000 16,596,199 1,519,567 427,633 14,495,000 11,960,000 22,220,000 125.113.399 Date Ends 11/19 11/21 11 /23 11 /24 10/10 12/17 12/10 11 /24 Outstanding Balance 10/31 /2009 $8,050,000 6,735,000 4,180,000 16,270,000 16,596,199 1,185,377 136,076 10,375,000 11/24 8,745,000 11 /27 19,880,000 92.152.652 Approved Amount ~~~~ ~~ November 18, 2009 Speaker's List Afternoon Session 1. Nanc Brown 2. Sharon Cornett 3. Bob Olsen 4. 5. ' ' Sti~~~~ C~~ heft SPA -~ Good afternoon. My name is Sharon Cornett. I am a Chesterfield County resident and president of the board of directors of the Richmond Animal League; a Chesterfield County no-kill animal shelter located in the Southport Business Park. I very much appreciate the opportunity to come before the board this afternoon to offer the Richmond Animal League's assistance to further reduce the number of homeless dogs and cats in Chesterfield County. Almost six years ago the Richmond Animal League entered into an informal agreement to work with Chesterfield County Animal Control and the Chesterfield County Humane Society to facilitate the transfer of dogs and cats to our shelter. During this time we have transferred in excess of 650 dogs-cats-puppies and kittens to the Richmond Animal League. We provided those animals with full medical care, including spay and neuter and adopted them to permanent homes. In doing so we helped lower the number of dogs and cats killed in the county shelter. But as helpful as this may be, we recognize that we must do more. Perhaps you have heard the term "no-kill community" mentioned of late. The definition of a no-kill community is one where all healthy, treatable dogs and cats are adopted. The no-kill philosophy cannot be implemented overnight and requires long range planning and implementation. But the first and most obvious building block of the no-kilt doctrine is to reduce the numbers of animal births within our community. This can be accomplished in a number of ways; among them is spaying and neutering county shelter animals before they are adopted. In September the Richmond Animal League announced the upcoming opening of a low cost/high volume spay neuter clinic in a facility housed on our property. We raised the funds needed to launch and sustain the clinic through private donations and a substantial grant from PetSmart Charities. The modular building has been delivered, a veterinarian has been hired and equipment has been ordered. If all goes according to plan, we anticipate the clinic will be operational within the next four to six weeks. Our services will be offered to any pet owner, humane group or municipal shelter without geographic restrictions. The Richmond Animal League appears before you today to offer our spay/neuter clinic to provide low cost surgeries for dogs and cats in the Chesterfield County shelter. In order to cover our cost for the surgeries we will perform, we will negotiate a fair and substantially reduced fee compared to what is available in the commercial market. We recognize that transporting shelter animals to our clinic with county employees will place a substantial burden on the county's financial resources. Therefore, the Richmond Animal League will guarantee transport of the animals to and from the county shelter in our vehicle that will be staffed by employees or volunteers of the Richmond Animal League. We will work with Chesterfield County Animal Control and the Chesterfield County Humane Society to establish a regular, workable transport schedule. Heartworm disease can pose a surgical risk to dogs while under anesthesia. Ideally, high risk dogs, primarily those that have lived outside, should be tested for heartworm disease prior to surgery. The Richmond Animal League will provide the manpower to test those high risk dogs before they are committed to surgery. This service will be supplied to the county at no charge. As I indicated, spay/neuter represents the foundation of a no-kill community. Equally important though is the ability of an agency to adopt its dogs and cats as quickly as possible. In an effort to facilitate more adoptions of county shelter animals, the Richmond Animal League will provide additional products/services that will be incentives to potential adopters who visit the county shelter. During the first year of a spay/neuter agreement between Chesterfield County and the Richmond Animal League, we will provide free microchips for all county shelter adult dogs and puppies sterilized in our clinic. The Richmond Animal League was founded 1979 and is the oldest no-kill humane society in the metropolitan area. We wish to use our resources and hands on experience to partner with Chesterfield County Animal Control and the Chesterfield County Humane Society to lay the groundwork for a no-kill community in Chesterfield. The first step to a permanent solution to the homeless animal population in Chesterfield is to spay and neuter all county shelter dogs and cats prior to adoption. The Richmond Animal League stands ready to work with the county to implement this life saving initiative. I thank you for your time and I will be glad to answer any questions you may have. Portable sign concerns ~ Bob Olsen r from: - `Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 4:06 PM Toi Bob Olsen Cc: Turner; Kirk; Tompkins, Michael; Allen, Greg; Barclay, Ted Subject: Portable sign concerns Mr. Olsen, Page 1 of 1 Staff has investigated the concerns you had raised regarding possible zoning violations that you observed at the Steinmart Festival Shopping Center and what appeared to be the Shell station at located at the intersection Midlothian Turnpike and Huguenot Road. With regards to the individual on the exercise bike in front of the Steinmart Festival Shopping Center; staff investigated the alleged violation on August 26, 2009 and determined the activity was occurring within the state right of way.. As you are no doubt aware, staff does not have the authority to enforce the County's sign regulations on ahy state or federal property. Further, there was no evidence at the time of staffs inspection that the activity as observed would clearly fall under the ordinance's definition of a sign(ref. Sac. 19-632"Sign"), even if it had occurred out of the state right of way. Nevertheless, staff spoke with individuals at American Family Fitness and cautioned them about the use of any displays/signs or other activities that might be a distraction to motorists and create a potential hazard to public safety. The. photo you provided of the placard at the service station is considered td be temporary, prrtable-sign and would be subject to the provisions of Section 19-634: Prohibited Signs. I have already opened a case for sign violation(s) at the Shell station.and have also spoken with individual employees there regarding County sign regulations and the portable placard sign, in particular. I hope staff has addressed your questions and concerns with respect to these particular issues. Please do not hesitate to contact Ted Barclay or me should you have additional questions or concerns. Thank you for your continued interest in improving the quality of life in Chesterfield County. Sincerely, 11/18/2009 Bob Olsen r From: Code Compliance Office [barclayt@chesterfield.gov] Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 7:09 AM To: r.e.olsen@verizon.net Subject: Online complaint form for 9828 Midlothian Wallpaper Place r.e.olsen Thank you for submitting the online complaint form for 9828 Midlothian Wallpaper Place. An inspector will visit the site within 5 business days. When a violation is observed, we will work with the property owner to resolve it. Violations in public roads should be referred to the Police Department The information you provide will be confidential. This information is excluded from the freedom of information act and does not have to be revealed. Chesterfield County policy is to not reveal the identity of complainants on zoning enforcement concerns. Thank you, Chesterfield Code Compliance Office Page 1 of 2 Bob Olsen From: Gateway@chesterfield.gov Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 7:58 AM To: cranfordj@chesterfield.gov; BarclayT@chesterfield.gov Cc: r.e.olsen@verizon.net Subject: Code Compliance Complaint Data from form "Code Compliance Complaint Form" was received on 8/20/2009 7:57:48 AM. Design a new form. Field Value Property Location Apollo's Pizza 10226 Midlothian Turnpike Unlicensed Vehicle false Discarded material false Tall grass false Operating a business from the home false Illegal Sign true Commercial truck parked on residential property false Violation of condition of zoning false More than 2 adult dogs on residential property false Fence too tall false Stock farm on residential property false Structures not meeting required setbacks false Single-family dwelling used fora duplex false Dwelling in a recreational vehicle false Recreational vehicle parked outside of the rear yard false Other Violation While they do have a valid Banner permit, The multiple portable signs used on site are not valid Name r.e.olsen 11/18/2009 Page 1 of 1 Bob Olsen From: Bob Olsen Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 7:51 AM To: 'Turner, Kirk' Cc: 'Barclay, Ted ; 'rjwmidlo@aol.com ; 'Dan Gecker' Subject: Zoning violations not resolved Attachments: McDonalds.jpg Sir: could you please explain these two particular cases. Haley Pontiac- Complaints filed 3-13-09, and 7-24-09-and today. Obviously a repeat offender that needs watching more closely. Mc Donalds-11125 Midlothian Turnpike complaints filed 3-25-09, 7-13-09, 8-20-09 all for the same violation, illegal flag (see Attached). Now if this is not a violation, please explain why not? If it is a violation could you please explain why after three complaints over 5 months, it still remains unabated? The attached picture was taken yesterday 8-31-09. Bob Olsen Midlothian Va. 11 /18/2009 ,~, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 14.A. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Delegate Kirk Cox for His Support of Economic and Community Development Efforts County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: GIB Board Action Requested: Mr. Warren has requested adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Delegate Kirk Cox was recently recognized as the Virginia Economic Developers Association Legislator of the Year for 2009. The attached resolution recognizes Delegate Cox's support of economic and community development efforts in Chesterfield County and the Commonwealth of Virginia. Preparers E. Wilson Davis, Jr. Title: Director, Economic Development Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ((;~ O E~'~ ~ ~ RECOGNIZING DELEGATE KIRK COX FOR HIS SUPPORT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS WHEREAS, Delegate Cox has served the 66th District of the House of Delegates, including 14 precincts in Chesterfield County, since 1989; and WHEREAS, Delegate Cox serves on the House Appropriations Committee as Chairman of the Economic Development, Agriculture, and Natural Resources Subcommittees; and WHEREAS, Delegate Cox is a strong proponent of the Commonwealth's economic efforts and an avid supporter of funding of economic development programs, including the Governor's Opportunity Fund, to ensure Virginia is well-positioned in an increasingly competitive environment; and WHEREAS, Delegate Cox was the patron of legislation that provides incentive financing for major employment and investment projects to better position Virginia to make the infrastructure improvements necessary to attract major new employers or "mega" projects to the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, Delegate Cox is also a strong supporter of the military, championing some 60 pieces of legislation in support of veterans, the military, and the war on terror, including introduction of landmark legislation to provide tax relief for junior military members from Virginia; and WHEREAS, Delegate Cox has endeavored to make Virginia the best place to live, work, and raise a family through his leadership efforts on a wide variety of issues important to his constituents such as quality education, economic development, and low taxes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 18th day of November 2009, publicly recognizes and thanks Delegate Kirk Cox for his support of economic and community development efforts to advance the prosperity of Chesterfield County and the Commonwealth, and congratulates him on his receipt of the Virginia Economic Developers Association Legislator of the Year award for 2009. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to Delegate Cox and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. ®~~~a3 ,~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meetin Date: October 28, 2009 Item Number: 14.6. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Boy Scouts Upon Attaining the Rank of Eagle Scout County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: U/ J Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff has received a request for the Board to adopt resolutions recognizing Mr. Stephen Andrew Butler, Jr., Troop 1891, sponsored by Bon Air United Methodist Church, and Mr. Brent Jarred Elder and Mr. James Adam Fletcher, both of Troop 2877, sponsored by Chester Presbyterian Church, upon attaining the rank of Eagle Scout. Mr. Butler is a resident of the Midlothian District, and Mr. Elder and Mr. Fletcher are residents of the Bermuda District. They will be present at the meeting, accompanied by members of their families, to accept the resolutions. Preparers Janice Blakley Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Clerk to the Board ^ No # G002F4 WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered by Congress in 1916; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build character, provide citizenship training and promote physical fitness; and WHEREAS, after variety of skills serving in a leade project beneficial demonstrating Scout and earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide including leadership, service and outdoor life, rship position in a troop, carrying out a service to his community, being active in the troop, spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; WHEREAS, Mr. Stephen Andrew Butler, Jr., Troop 1891, sponsored by Bon Air United Methodist Church, and Mr. Brent Jarred Elder and Mr. James Adam Fletcher, both of Troop 2877, sponsored by Chester Presbyterian Church, have accomplished those high standards of commitment and have reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout, which is earned by only four percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through their experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and endeavoring to prepare themselves for a role as leaders in society, Steve, Brent and Adam have distinguished themselves as members of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 18th day of November 2009, publicly recognizes Mr. Stephen Andrew Butler, Jr., Mr. Brent Jarred Elder and Mr. James Adam Fletcher, extends congratulations on their attainment of Eagle Scout, and acknowledges the good fortune of the county to have such outstanding young men as its citizens. November 18, 2009 Speaker's List Evening Session #1 (Following Presentation of Resolutions) 1. Ms. Jane Weisenfels 2. Ms. Jane Lanham 3. Mr. Bob Herndon 4. Ms. Robin Starr 5. Mr. Ron Ridenhour Evening Session #2 (End of the Evening Agenda) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ~G~e, l~elSeh-~c (s - SPee~~Ce~-#~-~ ~ ~ y ~s: r - 'rte 9-:: •. t __ a~ 1'. Z {h ~ "~ ~_ ~ '.jj.Y i ~ ~ .~ t °~ .. ~-. L ~ ~ ti ~ ~i . ~- ii k ~~ ~" k ~ x • W W O ~ `~ i" V o Q Z ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~~ L ~ - v~ Z W ~ ~ ~ z ~, f •. Q _ r` i~ 7 ~ V O W O O . .- ~.~-: ! iii O { s Q s i YS W ~ ~ ` W ~ V ~ ~, . . . t A .:. ~ tr s ~4 . 'ffi f. l ,~.~ ~ ~~- , t ~ ~~ ~ ~ - ~.L ~~y.S~ ~ V r Yf - 4 T...s ~~ki ';. 6.Y:. ~ .nz i, } ~ Z ' ~~ ~~~ • W i ~ }~ ~ ~ ~> :: ~ +: '~ ~ rl ~ ~+~,~ ~ ~ ~ t„~^k 7 ~: r fi ~ 1 _ ! to }~ . (w o ~ 4, ~ g }, 1 id: l r L f ', t ~ h ~c ~, a ~ • ~ ~O ~ J y ~ Q > W 4 ~~ ,~ O cC ~ ~ -~~ ~- I x Y ~ ~ • p0 W ~ n .. f ~ F a ~ ..~ ~ _ a~ ~ ~~a ~. : LgY ; _ ~ ~ ~ C f F L ~~. y ~~ 1, ~:y l.. C ~ T! i5 vZ~ ~ 4~ I ~ ~- if Yf. _ cih r .~ ~, , y Z 7 Y ~~ L~ h F - ~ ~ ~ Y ~~ ~ c t` ~~ W ~• - , • za _ a ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ o ` , a.. Q ;Y ~. W ;r Q ~~ • W ~ 4 -~~ ~ z a ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~w ~ ; -~ Z W V ~.., ~ • ~ ~~ [ ~ ~ Ai ~ k ~ ~~. .;~~ ~4~ fir` _ ~- . '~ ~ . W W ~b Q r. ~, . ~ DC ~~~ ' W ~n ;, ~, ,a a f _ 4 ~ F.. a + v ' 4 4 V ~ F. .~ ,. ~ F 5.~,? " S- ..~C Y°,l ,y~ l4 i, -0 h # F ~a t Chestertield Animal Control Summary of Costs to Kill and Dispose of Dogs and Cats Fiscal Years 2007, 2008 and 2009 Dub ~'~, r `I c~o ~ ~pe4~~.~r ~l°-3 Vet Expenses 2007 174,686 2008 139 912 2009 Total Av , 154,715 469,313 156,438 "Kill" Expense Cremation Expenses 46,032 26 718 33,484 36,727 116,243 38,748 Total , 72,750 27,344 60,828 20,056 56 783 74,118 1 24,706 , 90,361 63,454 Vet + Cremation 201,404 167,256 174,771 543,431 181,144 Percent of Total 36.1% 36.4% 32.5% 35.03% 35.03% ("Kill" + Cremation as a percent of vet + cremation expenses) co C Q O OO O OC N w ~ O .O ~ U y o ~ o ~[] O N Q (0 O a w o ~ O N ~ y N ~ a} t W U p U w ~' lL (~ c 0 m ~ ~ U I- ~, O t f~ Y y f0 ~C Q O H ~ ~ co ~ n ~ ri Sri _ -~ M ~ N O N ~ ~ O i ~ O N ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ch ~ ~ M -~ r r ~t O r to ti O N N ... ~ N M ~ M N O O ~ O f M ~ ~ ~ to t+9 ~ !A M ~ ~I O ~ N N O~ O tq w O ~ ~ ~' O Cep M O ~ U `- y O ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ N N M ~ ~`'~ N t (O ~ .-- ~ ~ ~ M U ~ ^ ~ M .- ~ ~ ~ cD ~ (~ O H co a~ } U cn o N 0 N 0 N :° O ~ O N 00 O O N N n V N ~ y H O ~ ~ O j~ __ w v Y p fA w V M ~ O L d ~ ~ O E > V C . N VJ ~ c C N '~ •~ R ' ~o R ~ O O O O ~ O Y N ~~ _ N N N .a > O~ O v V LL Q ~ ~ ~ y .~- r r E N c0 ca N c W `" a rn t o ~ N .-- U c Q a~ a r ap o ~ o .a wcaq Cq Q N a0 O +`-~ ~ >, O Y CD U U 3 o ~ o~ i. ~ ~- O O N N ~ N f0 'a U O 2 }? co E N ~ ~ N ~ . y Q W ~c N O) Q ~ N U ~ ~ N ~ a ~ y CO 1~ O ~ O Oy ~ ^ eM- C U ~oa`~iorn pCDMCOM ~. O O ~ ~ ~ O O O ~ U ~? ~ ~ M a o 0 0 0 ~ o (0 M •- ~ .- O f- O O~j ~ CV N N ~ ' ~ O U') CO ct ~T E N c o ° o rnw rn~ o ca o m "O U 'O U ~o ~`~ ~ r h d~ ~ ~e~~ r~,~ Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors November 18, 2009 Presentation Packet • Copy of Presentation • Collaborative Animal Welfare System Proposals • "NO KILL" Declaration • Summary of Expenses to kill and dispose of animals • Summary of Cremation expenses 2007-2009 • Detail Cremation expenses 2007-2009 • Asilomar Accords • "Why Transparency", Richard Avanzino, Maddie's Fund President • Maddie's Fund Starter Grant Guidelines • Animal Statistics Table for Richmond Community reported to Maddie's Fund (Richmond SPCA and Richmond Animal Care and Control) MAN'S BEST FRIEND: "With friends like these, who needs enemies? Shelter: "An establishment that takes in and looks after lost or unwanted animals"; a re u e! What I am about to communicate is not about me, and ne or any organization represented, nor is it about xou. It is about the animals. ! Them del for "no-kill" has already been developed. The wheel has been created. Chesterfield County, `~A First Choice Community", does not have to start from scratch! It merely needs to duplicate the successful model used by many others throughout America. i What is needed in Chesterfield County? 1. A mfr change in the philosophy of animal care. 2. A olic adopted at the Board level that: • Places an emphasis on livesaving; • Incorporates the philosophy of the "No-Kill Doctrine"; and 3. Accountability and Transparency. a. Asilomar Accords -Provide uniform definitions and a consistent, transparent reporting structure. b. A lifesaving plan; charting successes & fai_'lu_r_es; c. Transparency: Post Information on the Internet. Use social networking sites like Facebook and Tw_ er. Let the ublic know the ood, the b d and the ~. 4. A shelter manager committed to "no-kill"; unwilling to hide behind the m,~th of "too many animals, not 2 enough homes", or make excuses as to why animals are being killed. Benefits to Chesterfield County? 1. Public Safety -Our treatment, or mistreatment, of animals shows up in other, unsavory, criminal behavior. 2. Financial -reduction in operating costs by reducing expenses incurred for killing and cremating animals, plus increasing revenues from adoptions. (Financial information is included in your packet) 3. Image -Chesterfield becomes a member of the "no- kill" communities nationwide, along with Hanover County, the City of Richmond, Charlottesville- 3 Albemarle SPCA, San Francisco, CA, Tompkins County, NY and many others. 4. By working with. rescue organizations, Chesterfield Count takes another step forward as A First Choice Community! The pictures you have seen on the slides as I was talking are all of animals rescued from death at the Chesterfield Shelter. Think of them and remember their faces! The animals THANK YOU for your time and consideration! Their lives depend on your decision! 4 Collaborative Animal Welfare System (CAWS) Chesterfield County, Virginia November 2, 2009 "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." Immanuel Kant Proposals • "No-Kill" Policy for Chesterfield County. By adopting a "no-kill" policy for Chesterfield County with the goal to reach 100% no-kill for healthy, manageable dogs and cats by 2015, Chesterfield Animal Control and other members of the CAWS could be eligible for grants from the following foundations: Maddie's Fund, Petco Foundation, Petsmart Foundation, Edith J. Goode Residuary Trust, Handsel Foundation and many, many others. These foundations reward local pounds, humane societies and other collaborative participants for making the decision on their own to adopt a "no-kill" policy, gathering and reporting data, implementing the policy and achieving the goal of "no-kill". In addition to a humanitarian gesture, adopting a "no-kill" policy is public safety and educational issue. How we treat, or mistreat, animals shows up in other, unsavory criminal behavior. The following Virginia organizations have received grants from Maddies Fund, the largest foundation with a goal of a "no-kill" nation by 2015. Richmond Animal Care & Control (2006-2008); total of $110,000 thru Richmond Animal Welfare Foundation (RAWF) Richmond SPCA (2008 grant = $160,000) Charlottesville-Albemarle County SPCA (2008 Lifesaving Award = $412,050) Rockingham County -Starter Grant = $10,000 Virginia Peninsula, VA -Starter Grant = $10,000 100% Spay/Neuter. By spaying/neutering animals before adoption, the reproduction rate is reduced. Those pounds who have implemented such a policy plus low cost spay/neutering programs have experienced a reduction in the numbers coming into the pound. Also, adoption rates increase because the animals have already been spayed or neutered and people elsewhere in Virginia and other states are able to adopt the animals when they see on the County's web site or Petfinders the animal has been spayed/neutered. • Increase Adoption Fee. An adoption fee of $75-$100 would enable the pound to recover most of its veterinary costs, including having the animals spayed/neutered before being adopted out of the shelter. • Collaborative Animal Welfare Organization. Create a 9 member CAW organization with a mission to work together for the betterment of the animals and facilitate the county in (1) achieving its goal of "no- kill" by 2015, (2) 100% spay neuter, before adoption (3) Trap-Neuter-Release (TNR) of feral cats, (4) creative, innovative shelter programs and techniques, including more "customer friendly "hours of operation and (5) efficiencies in operating costs. The members of the CAW organization would be appointed by the Board of Supervisors and comprised of 1 member from each of the following: Chesterfield Animal Control, Chesterfield Human Society, Richmond Animal League, Richmond SPCA, Board of Supervisors Liaison, School Board Liaison, Veterinary Representative with no financial conflict with the shelter or CHS and 2 representatives of local rescue organizations, i.e. Angel Dogs, AARF, Bark, Happe, Heavenly Hounds, etc. A collaborative effort of this nature is required by organizations that provide grants to local pounds, humane societies, animal rescue organizations, etc. DECLARATION OF THE NO KILL MOVEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES ~. ~rcam6lc Qne hundred and ~i~ty years ago, societies ~or the prevention o•• cruelty to animals and other humane organizations were ~ounded to establish standards for humane treatment o{- animals, to Promote their rights, and to protect them from harm. This marked the formal beginning o~the humane movement in the unitedjtates. The scope and in~luence o~ these early humane organizations were testament to the Public's concern ~or animals. ~t did not take long for them to set their sights on the abuse o~ homeless animals and cruel methods o~ killing by Public Pounds. ~t was common Practice at the time for city and town dogcatchers to beat, drown, or shoot homeless animals. Many humane agencies responded by entering into animal control contracts with towns and cities to ensure that the killing was clone more humanely. gut in taking on municipal animal control duties, these agencies abandoned their lifesaving and lie-enhancing Platforms when those belies conflicted with their contractual responsibilities. ~n the current era, where laws re9uire killing by even more "humane" methods, these contradictions have become starker. increasingly, the practices o~ both humane societies and municipal animal control agencies are out o~ step with public sentiment. Today, most Americans hold the humane treatment o~ animals as a Personal value, which is reflected in our Taws, cultural Practices, the proliferation o~ organizations founded •-or animal protection, increased per capita spending on animal care, and great advancements in veterinary medicine. gut the agencies that the Public expects to Protect animals are instead killing more than ~ive million animals annually. Lifesaving alternatives to the mass killing o~ animals in shelters have existed •-or decades. These lifesaving methods are based on innovative, humane, nonlethal programs and services that have Proven that the killing can be brought to an end. Too many o•• these agencies, however, remain mired in the kill philosophies o•• the Past, unwilling to or hampered ~rom exploring and adopting methods that save lives. This is a breach of their Public trust, a gross deviation from their responsibility to protect animals, and a point of view that we, as caring People and a humane community; can nn longer accept or tolerate. ~/~le assert that a No {sill nation is within our reach-that the killing can and must be brought to an end. ~t is up to each o~ us working individually and together to implement sheltering models that have already saved tens of thousands o•• animals in Progressive communities. ~~ we work together-with certainty o~ purpose, assured of our own success, with the commitment that "what must be done, will be done"-the attainment of our goals will not be far o{~. jePtem6er 2005 f . No Ki~~ }Zesotution Whereas, the right to live is every animal's most basic and fundamental right; Whereas, societies ~or the prevention of cruelty to animals and other humane organizations were founded to establish standards •`or humane treatment o~ animals, to promote their rights, and to protect them from harm; Whereas, traditional sheltering practices allow the mass killing of sheltered animals; Whereas, every year shelters in the united States are killing millions o~ healthy and treatable animals who could 6e placed in homes, and are also killing millions o~ ~eral cats who do not belong in shelters; Whereas, lie always takes precedence over expediency; Whereas, the No Kill movement in the united States has successFully implemented new and innovative programs that provide alternatives to mass killing; Whereas, lifesaving change will come about only i~ No Kill programs are embraced and further developed; Whereas, failure to implement No Kill programs constitutes a breach of the public's trust in the sheltering community; Now, therefore, be it resolved that No Kill policies and procedures are the only legitimate foundation for animal sheltering; and, ~t is incumbent upon all shelters and animal groups to embrace the philosophy of No Kill, to immediately begin implementing programs and services that will end the mass killing o~ sheltered animals, and to reject the ailed kill-oriented practices o~ the past. ~~~• Sta~cmen~ of }~i~hts~ We acknowledge the ~ollowing: • Sheltered animals have a right to live; • ~eral cats have a right to their lives and their habitats; • Animals, rescuers, and the public have a right to expect animal protection organizations and animal shelters to do everything in their power to promote, protect, and advocate for the lives o~ animals; • Animal protection groups, rescue groups, and No Kill shelters have a right to take into their custody animals who would otherwise be killed by animal shelters; • Taxpayers and community members have a right to have theirgovernment spend tax monies on programs and services whose purpose is to save and enhance the lives o~ all animals; • Taxpayers and community members have a right to Full and complete disclosure about how animal shelters operate. September 2005 ~~. ~jui~inP PrinciP~cs (~o Kill is achieved only by guaranteeing the FOllowing: • LiFe to all healthy animals, and to al~ sick, inured, orvicious animals where medical or behavioral intervention would alter a Poor orgrave prognosis; • The right of Feral cats to live in their habitats. These conditions can be achieved onI y through adherence to the Following: • Shelters and humane groups end the killing of healthy and treatable animals, including Feral cats; •very animal in a shelter receives individual consideration, regardless of how many animals a shelter takes in, or whether such animals are healthy, underaged, elderly, sick, injured, traumatized, or Feral; • Shelters and humane organizations discontinue the use of language that misleads the Public and glosses over the nature of their actions, such as "euthanasia," "unadoptable," "fractious," "Putting them to sleep," and Other CUPhemisms that downplay the gravity of ending IiFe and make the task of killing easier; • Shelters are open to the public during hours that Permit working People to reclaim or adopt animals during nonworking hours; • Shelters and othergovernment agencies promote spay neuter programs and mandate that animals be spayed or neutered beFore adoption; • Public shelters work with humane animal adoption organizations to the Fullest extent to promote the adoption of animals and to reduce the rate of killing; • Shelters provide care and treatment For all animals in shelters to the extent necessary, including prompt veterinary care, ade9uate nutrition, shelter, exercise, and socialization; • Shelters are held accountable For and make inFormation publicly available about all the animals in their care. V. n{o ~i~~~" tandards The implementation of these IiFesaving Procedures, policies, and Programs must be the immediate goal of every shelter, and animal control and animal welFare agency: >`ormal, active commitment by shelter directors, management, and staFF to lifesaving Programs and Policies, and dedication to Promptly ending mass killing of shelter animals; ~mmediate implementation of the Following programs by aII publicly funded or subsidized animal shelters: Septcm6er 2005 • high-volume, Iow-and no-cost spay neuter services; A foster care network for underaged, traumatized, sick, inured, or other animals needing refuge before any sheltered animal is killed, unless the prognosis for rehabilitation o~ that individual animal is poor orgrave; Comprehensive adoption programs that operate during weekend and evening hours and include o{-~site adoption venues; ^ Medical and behavioral rehabilitation programs; • Pet retention programs to solve medical, environmental, or behavioral problems and keep animals with their caring and responsible caregivers; • Trap-Neuter-Return or }Zelease (T(v~ programs; • }Zescue group access to shelter animals; ~/olunteer programs to socialize animals, promote adoptions, and help in the operations o~ the shelter; ^ documentation be~ore any animal is killed that alI e{~orts to save the animal have been considered, including medical and behavioral rehabilitation, foster care, rescue groups, neuter and release, and adoption. • An end to the policy o~ accepting trapped ~eral cats to be destroyed as unadoptable, and implementation o~ TNR as the accepted method of feral cat control by educating the public about TNR and o{~ering TNR program services; • An end to the use of temperament testing that results in !<illing animals who are not truly vicious (e.g., shy/timid cats and frightened dogs) but who can be placed in homes, or are feral cats who can be returned or released; • Abolishment o~ trapping, lending traps to the public to capture animals, and support o~ trapping by shelters, governments, and pest control companies ~or the purposes o~ removing animals to be killed; • An end to owner-re9uested killing of animals unless the shelter has made an independent determination that the animal is irremediably su{fering or cannot be rehabilitated; • The repeal o~ unenforceable and counter-productive animal control ordinances such as cat licensing and leash laws, pet limit laws, bans on ~eeding stray animals, and bans on specific breeds. September 2005 N (0 C Q O C ~ O O N U a c ~ y t0 ~ O Q C N ~ a~0i yam} y ~. f0 L W ai U o ii N c _o u. ~ C ~L U m Fes- U rn o rn ~n cD r- _~ M f~ M O NEli N rn ~ ~ •= ri ~ci o ~ ~' [r M ti rta 4f? O N O ti M O r r M f0 O ~ I- O L M M t0 C _ ~ r ~ ~ Y y y ~ N Q a y ~ ~ O N ~ U 00 M r CD ~ <O to O f~ 00 n ~ r ~ M l1') OC co ~ n L _ ~i t ti M r ~ r r ~ ~ ~ (0 .~ O F- f9 O ti O U N N H y LL 0p N O e 0 O ~ O r Qf O ti M O ~ ~ N ~ a- M N M M tC 1/~ cD e}' O 1A r 0 0 N N ~ N V ~ y H L O ~ ~ H ++ !0 Y ~ N O v "' r+ N N+ O d r ~ o ~ d ~ O > V C ~ ~ ~ > to H Id Q1 W ~ C C '~ '~ t0 t0 !Q C1 N N ~ io as 1~ Op G ,a d Y r+ t0 ld C O O ~' ~ ~ IBC O V V 0 W N N O ~ fA 01 V l 0 10 l4 y j YJ ~k Q C C ~ LL LL ~ Chesterfield County Animal Control Cremation Expenses Summary of Expenses for Fiscal Years 2007, 2008 and 2009 Fiscal Year Total 2007 26,717.59 2008 27,343.60 2009 20,055.56 Total 74,116.75 Chesterfield County Animal Control Sweet Dreams Cremation Services For Fiscal Year 2007 Date Qty Rate Total 7/5/2006 750.0 0.62 465.00 7/12/2006 1,172.0 0.62 726.64 7/19/2006 854.0 0.62 529.48 7/26/2006 1,146.0 0.62 710.52 8/2/2006 1,070.7 0.62 663.83 8/9/2006 995.0 0.62 616.90 8/16/2006 631.0 0.62 391.22 8/23/2006 811.0 0.62 502.82 8/30/2006 682.0 0.62 422.84 9/6/2006 910.0 0.62 564.20 9/13/2006 1,027.0 0.62 636.74 9/20/2006 1,245.0 0.62 771.90 9/27/2006 1,112.0 0.62 689.44 10/4/2006 943.0 0.62 584.66 10/11/2006 1,030.3 0.62 638.79 10/18/2006 1,222.0 0.62 757.64 10/25/2006 1,388.8 0.62 861.06 11 /1 /2006 685.0 0.62 424.70 11 /8/2006 774.0 0.62 479.88 11/15/2006 597.0 0.62 370.14 11 /22/2006 702.0 0.62 435.24 11 /29/2006 522.0 0.62 323.64 12/6/2006 1,696.7 0.62 1,051.95 12/13/2006 886.0 0.62 549.32 12/20/2006 117.0 0.62 72.54 12/27/2006 194.0 0.62 120.28 1 /3/2007 380.0 0.62 235.60 1 /5/2007 10.0 41.80 418.00 1 /10/2007 729.2 0.62 452.10 1/17/2007 774.0 0.62 479.88 1/24/2007 696.0 0.62 431.52 2/1!2007 1,197.0 0.62 742.14 2/7/2007 483.0 0.62 299.46 2/14/2007 475.0 0.62 294.50 2/21 /2007 772.0 0.62 478.64 2/27/2007 865.0 0.62 536.30 3/7/2007 797.0 0.62 494.14 3/14/2007 927.0 0.62 574.74 3/21 /2007 582.0 0.62 360.84 3/28!2007 1,029.0 0.62 637.98 4/4/2007 542.0 0.62 336.04 4/11/2007 878.0 0.62 544.36 4/18/2007 632.0 0.62 391.84 4/25/2007 493.0 0.62 305.66 5/2/2007 906.0 0.62 561.72 5/9/2007 868.0 0.62 538.16 5/23/2007 627.0 0.62 388.74 5/30/2007 698.0 0.62 432.76 6/6/2007 1,092.0 0.62 677.04 6/13/2007 1,042.0 0.62 646.04 50; 30x50 Ig cadaver bags (inv # 12272007) Chesterfield County Animal Control Sweet Dreams Cremation Services For Fiscal Year 2007 Date Qty Rate Total 6/20/2007 496.0 0.62 307.52 6/27/2007 1,275.0 0.62 790.50 Total 26,717.59 Chesterfield County Animal Control Sweet Dreams Cremation Services For Fiscal Year 2008 Date Qty Rate Total 5/17/2007 1,484.0 0.62 920.08 7/3/2007 513.0 0.65 333.45 7/18/2007 906.0 0.65 588.90 7/25/2007 892.0 0.65 579.80 8/1 /2007 1, 734.8 0.65 1,127.62 8/8/2007 1,075.0 0.65 698.75 8/15/2007 733.0 0.65 476.45 8/22/2007 916.0 0.65 595.40 8/26/2007 12.0 41.80 501.60 8/29/2007 971.0 0.65 631.15 9/5/2007 1,052.0 0.65 683.80 9/12/2007 1,133.0 0.65 736.45 9/19/2007 1,271.0 0.65 826.15 9/26/2007 1,073.0 0.65 697.45 1011/2007 997.0 0.65 648.05 10/3/2007 906.0 0.65 588.90 10/10/2007 541.0 0.65 351.65 10/17/2007 579.0 0.65 376.35 10/24/2007 282.0 0.65 183.30 11 /1 /2007 853.0 0.65 554.45 11 /7/2007 580.0 0.65 377.00 11 /14/2007 1,163.0 0.65 755.95 11 /21 /2007 840.0 0.65 546.00 11/28/2007 541.0 0.65 351.65 12/5/2007 1,090.0 0.65 708.50 12/12/2007 714.0 0.65 464.10 12/19/2007 507.0 0.65 329.55 1 /2/2008 512.0 0.65 332.80 1 /9/2008 717.0 0.65 466.05 1/16/2008 335.0 0.65 217.75 1 /23/2008 426.0 0.65 276.90 1/30/2008 923.0 0.65 599.95 2/6/2008 428.0 0.65 278.20 2/12/2008 868.0 0.65 564.20 2/20/2008 604.0 0.65 392.60 2/25/2008 10.0 41.80 418.00 2/27/2008 893.0 0.65 580.45 3/5/2008 792.0 0.65 514.80 3/12/2008 394.0 0.65 256.10 3/19/2008 822.0 0.65 534.30 3/26/2008 715.0 0.65 464.75 4/9/2008 515.0 0.65 334.75 4/16/2008 1,113.0 0.65 723.45 4/23/2008 539.0 0.65 350.35 4/30/2008 829.0 0.65 538.85 5/7/2008 604.0 0.65 392.60 5/14/2008 543.0 0.65 352.95 5/21/2008 985.0 0.65 640.25 5/28/2008 386.0 0.65 250.90 6/3/2008 566.0 0.65 367.90 Approved 8/8/07; entered 8/14/07 50, 30x50 Ig cadaver bags (inv # 270826) Inv is for pickup on 7/11/07; inv # 270711 50; 30x50 Ig cadaver bags; inv # 4116 Chesterfield County Animal Control Sweet Dreams Cremation Services For Fiscal Year 2008 Date Qty Rate Total 6/11/2008 695.0 0.65 451.75 6/18/2008 1,321.0 0.65 858.65 6/25/2008 849.0 0.65 551.85 Total 27,343.60 Chesterfield Animal Control Sweet Dreams Cremation Services For Fiscal Year 2009 Date Qty Rate Total 7/30/2008 653 0.6825 445.67 7/23/2008 924 0.6825 630.63 7/16/2008 823 0.6825 561.70 7/2/2008 532 0.6825 363.09 7/9/2008 642 0.6825 438.16 8/27/2008 787 0.6825 537.13 8/20/2008 853 0.6825 582.17 8/13/2008 567 0.6825 386.98 8/7/2008 2 DBPI 177.76 8/6/2008 802 0.6825 547.37 9/9/2008 661 0.6825 451.13 9/3/2008 950 0.6825 648.38 9/18/2008 736 0.6825 502.32 6/18/2008 768 0.6825 524.16 10/29/2008 320 0.6825 218.40 10/1/2008 826 0.6825 563.75 10/9/2008 705 0.6825 481.16 10/15/2008 668 0.6825 455.91 10/22/2008 753 0.6825 513.92 11 /5/2008 690 0.6825 470.93 11/19/2008 726 0.6825 495.50 11/12/2008 889 0.6825 606.74 11 /28/2008 679 0.6825 463.42 12/3/2008 810 0.6825 552.83 12/10/2008 535 0.6825 365.14 1 /21 /2009 605 0.6825 412.91 1/1/2009 102 0.6825 69.62 1/14/2009 616 0.6825 420.42 2/4/2009 759 0.6825 518.02 2/11 /2009 676 0.6825 461.37 2/18/2009 589 0.6825 401.99 2/1 /2009 481 0.6825 328.28 2/25/2009 377 0.6825 257.30 3/25/2009 592 0.6825 404.04 3/18/2009 196 0.6825 133.77 3/11/2009 380 0.6825 259.35 3/4/2009 618 0.6825 421.79 4/29/2009 711 0.6825 485.26 4/1/2009 722 0.6825 492.77 4/22/2009 381 0.6825 260.03 4/15/2009 672 0.6825 458.64 4/8/2009 611 0.6825 417.01 5/13/2009 703 0.6825 479.80 5/14/2009 159 0.6825 108.52 5/20/2009 670 0.6825 457.28 5/27/2009 579 0.6825 395.17 5/5/2009 627 0.6825 427.93 Total 29,127 20,055.56 Ulossary of Terms ASILC?MAF~ .AC~CQRD~ pets ! people ` ,_r>mmunity Read the Asilomar Accords Guiding Principles Definitions Page 1 of 5 Statistics and Formulas A) Beginning Shelter Count (date): "i"he number of dogs and cats in your shelter Glossary of Terms or in your care including fosters at the beginning of the reporting period. The How to Implement the Accords reporting period is annual - either a calendar year or a fiscal year. (date) refers to the first day of the reporting period written in the following format: month/day/year. Participating Organizations Intake (Live Dogs & Cats Only): This table only deals 4vith live dogs and cats for Frequently Asked Questions which your shelter or animal group assumed responsibility. Dogs and cats categorized as "dead on arrival" or DOA are not included in these statistics. For The Founders intake animals, status is determined at the time paperwork is initiated. Contact Us B) From the Public: The number of live dogs and cats your shelter or animal group received from the public. This includes dogs and cats turned in or surrendered by their owners/guardians; stray dogs and cats turned in by the public; stray dogs and " cats picked up in the field; and dogs and cats impounded for cruelty investigation We all have the same goal-to , custody care, and statutory/ordinance impoundment. help animals-and we always have. But in the past we focused on minor differences C) Incoming Transfers from Organizations within Community/Coalition: The instead of focusing on what we number of dogs and cats your shelter or animal group received from other animal could accomplish if we worked .organizations participating in your collaborative group. (This only applies if the together. Hopefully, the reporting organization is working collaboratively with other shelters/groups in their Asilomar Accords will change that way of thinking " area.) NOTE: On the community or coalition level, C (Incoming Transfers from . -- Bob Rohde Organizations within Community/Coalition) should equal J (Outgoing Transfers to Organizations within Community/Coalition). D) Incoming Transfers from Organizations outside Community/Coalition: The number of dogs and cats your shelter or animal group received from animal organizations that are not participating in your collaborative group. NOTE: If you are not part of a collaboration that is compiling statistics, then all your incoming transfers ^.~ou!d be listed h r ~. E) From Owners/Guardians Requesting Euthanasia: The number of dogs and cats turned in or surrendered to your shelter or animal group by their owners/guardians for the purpose of euthanasia. This includes all categories of dogs and cats {healthy, treatable-rehabilitatable, treatable-manageable, unhealthy & untreatable). [See M, N, 0, P for definitions of healthy, treatable-rehabilitatable, treatable-manageable, unhealthy & untreatable.] F) Totai Intake: The sum of lines 8 through E. This includes all live dogs and cats for which your shelter or animal group assumed responsibility. http://www.asilomaraccords.org/glossary.html 11/16/2009 GLOSSARY OF TERMS Glossary of Terms Page 2 of 5 G) Owner/Guardian Requested Euthanasia (Unhealthy & Untreatable Only): The number of unhealthy & untreatable dogs and cats your shelter or animal group euthanized at the request of their owners/guardians and the number of dogs and cats orderfad to be euthanized by legislative, judicial or administrative action. Do not include any dogs and cats your shelter or animal group euthanized at the request of their owners/guardians and who were considered to be healthy, treatable- rehabilitatable or treatable-manageable at ktie time of death. [See M, N, 0, P for definitions of healthy, treatable-rehabilitatable, treatable-manageable, unhealthy & untreatable.] H) Adjusted Total Intake: Lines F minus G. Total Intake minus the number of unhealthy & untreatable dogs and cats your shelter or animal group euthanized at the request of their owners/guardians. [See P for definition of unhealthy & untreatable category.] I) Adoptions: The number of dogs and cats your shelter or animal group placed with members of the public. Do not include dogs and cats in foster homes or dogs and cats transferred to other animal welfare organizations. )) Outgoing Transfers to Organizations within Community/Coalition: The number of dogs and cats your shelter or animal group turned over to other animal organizations within your collaborative group. (This only applies if the reporting organization is working collaboratively with other shelters/groups in their area.) NOTE: On the community or coalition level, 7 (Outgoing Transfers to Organizations within Community/Coalition) should be equal to C (Incoming Transfers from Organizations within Community/Coalition). K) Outgoing Transfers to Organizations outside Community/Coalition: The number of dogs and cats your shelter or animal group turned over to animal organizations that are not part of your collaborative group. NOTE: If you are not part of a collaboration which is compiling statistics, then all your outgoing transfers would be listed here. L) Return to Owner/Guardian: The number of stray dogs and cats your shelter or animal group reunited with their owners/guardians and the number of dogs and cats reclaimed by their owners/guardians. Dogs & Cats Euthanized: The number of dogs and cats your shelter or animal group euthanized, broken down into the following categories: healthy; treatable- rehabilitatable; treatable-manageable; and unhealthy & untreatable. Dogs and cats are Categorized at Gie time Of euthanasia. [See hi, iJ, v, P fur defiriitloris of flealttly, treatable-rehabilitatable, treatable-manageable, unhealthy & untreatable.] M) Healthy (includes Owner/Guardian Requested Euthanasia): The number of healthy dogs and cats that your shelter or animal group euthanized including the number of healthy dogs and cats your shelter or animal group euthanized at the request of their owners/guardians. "f"he term "healthy" means and includes all dogs and cats eight weeks of age or older that, at or subsequent to the time the animal is taken into possession, have manifested no sign of a behavioral or temperamental characteristic that could pose a health or safety risk or otherwise make the animal unsr,itable for placement as a pet, http://www.asilomaraccords.org/glossary.html 11/16/2009 Glossary of Terms Page 3 of 5 and have manifested no sign of disease, injury, or congenital or hereditary condition that adversely affects the health of the animal or that is likely to adversely affect the animal's health in the future. N) Treatable - Rehabilitatable (Includes Owner/Guardian Requested Euthanasia): The number of treatable -rehabilitatable dogs and cats that your shelter or animal group euthanized including the number of treatable - rehabilitatable dogs and cats your shelter or animal group euthanized at the request of their owners/guardians. (These conditions are generally considered to be curable.) The term "treatable" means and includes all dogs and cats who are "rehabilitatable" and all dogs and cats who are "manageable." The term "rehabilitatable" means and includes all dogs and cats who are not "healthy," but who are likely to become "healthy," if given medical, foster, behavioral, or other care equivalent to the care typically provided to pets by reasonable and caring pet owners/guardians in the comrn u n ity. O) Treatable -Manageable (Includes Owner/Guardian Requested Euthanasia): The number of treatable -manageable dogs and cats that your shelter or animal group euthanized including the number of treatable -manageable dogs and cats your shelter or animal group euthanized at the request of their owners/guardians. (These conditions are generally considered to be chronic.} The term "treatable" means and includes all dogs and cats who are "rehabilitatable" and all dogs and cats who are "manageable." The term "manageable" means and includes all dogs and cats who are not "healthy" and who are not likely to become "healthy," regardless of the care provided; but who would likely maintain a satisfactory quality of life, if given medical, foster, behavioral, or other care, including long-term care, equivalent to the care typically provided to pets by reasonable and caring pet owners/guardians in the community; provided, however, that the term "manageable" does not include any dog or cat who is determined to pose a significant risk to human health or safety or to the health or safety of other animals. P) Unhealthy & Untreatable (Includes Owner/Guardian Requested Euthanasia): The number of unhealthy & untreatable dogs and cats that your shelter or animal group euthanized including the number of unhealthy & untreatable dogs and cats your shelter or animal group euthanized at the request of their owners/guardians and the number of dogs anci cats ordered to be euthanized by legislative, judicial or administrative action. The term "Unhealthy and Untreatable" means and includes all dogs and cats who, at or subsequent to the time they are taken ii7to possession, (1} have a behavioral or temperamental characteri<.;tic: that poses a health or safety risk or otherwise makes the animal unsuitable for placement as a pet:, and are not likely to become "healthy" or "treatable" even if provided the care .typically provided to pets by reasonable and caring pet owners/guardians in the community; or (2) are suffering from a disease, injury, or congenital or hereditary condition that adversely affects the animal's health or is likely to adversely affect the animal's health in the future, and are not likely to become "healthy" or "treatable" even if provided the care typically provided to pets by reasonable and caring pet owners/guardians in the community; or (3) are under the age of eighf. weeks and arse not likely to become "healthy" or "treatable," even if http://www.asilomaraccords.org/glossary.html 11/16/2009 Glossary of Terms provided the care typically provided to pets by reasonable and caring pet owr;ers/guardians in the community. Page 4 of 5 Q) Total Euthanasia: Sum of lines M through P. This includes all dogs and cats your shelter or animal group euthanized (Healthy, Treatable - Rehabilitatable, Treatable - Manageable, and Unhealthy & Untreatable). [See M, N, 0, P for definitions of healthy, treatable-rehabilitatable, treatable-manageable, unhealthy & untreatable.] R) Owner/Guardian Requested Euthanasia (Unhealthy & Untreatable Only): The number of unhealthy & untreatable dogs and cats that your shelter or animal group euthanized at the request of their o4vners/guardians and the number of dogs and cats ordered to be euthanized by legislative, judicial or administrative action. Do not include any dogs and cats your shelter or animal group euthanized at the request of their owners/guardians and who were considered to be healthy, treatable- rehabilitatable or treatable-manageable at the time of death. [See M, N, 0, P for definitions of healthy, treatable-rehabilitatable, treatable-manageable, unhealthy & untreatable.] S) Adjusted Total Euthanasia: Total Eutlranasia minus Owner/Guardian Request Euthanasia (Unhealthy & Untreatable Only}. [See P for definition of unhealthy ~ untreatable category.] T) Subtotal Outcomes: Sum of lines I through L plus S. This includes the number of dogs and cats that your shelter or animal group adopted, transferred, returned to owner/guardian. Do not include the nramber- of dogs and cats who died or were lost while in your shelter or in your care or the number of wihealthy & untreatable dogs and cats thak your shelter or animal group euthanized at the request of their owners/guardians or the rrurrrber of dogs and cats ordered to be euthanized by legislative, judicial or administrative action. [See P for definition of unhealthy & untreatable category.] U) Died or Lost in Shelter/Care: The number of dogs and cats for which your shelter or animal group assun•red responsibility and who died or could not be accounted for. This includes the number of dogs and cats who died of medical complications (and were not euthanized), died in foster care or in transit, or were lost or stolen from the shelter. V) Total Outcomes: Sum of lines T and U. -this is the total number of dag and cat outcomes which includes the number of dogs and cats your shelter or animal group adopted, transferred, returned to owner/guardian plus the number of dogs and cats fur which your siieiier ur anirnai yroup assumed responsibility and who died of medical complications (and were not euthanized) or were lost or stolen (from the shelter or foster care). Total outcomes do not include the number of unhealthy & untreatable dogs and cats that your shelter or animal group euthanized at the request of their owners/guardians or the nrrrnber of dogs and cats ordered to be euthanized by leyislative, judicial or administrative action. [See P for definition of unhealthy & untreatable category.] W) Ending Shelter Count (date): The number of dogs and cats in your shelter or in your care including fosters at the end of the reporting period. The reporting period is annual - either a calerrdar• year or a fiscal year. (date) refers to the last day of the reporting period written in the following format: month/day/year. http://www.asilomaraccords.org/glossary.html 11/16/2009 Glossary of Terms Page 5 of 5 Special Note: To ca!cuiate Che Annual Live Release Rate for your community or coalition, each participating shelter or animal group will need to fill out the Annual Animal Statistics Table for their individual organization. The reporting organization for the comrunity/coalition will then corr~pile this information for all the groups in one table and follow the instn~ctions for calculating the community/coalition rate. P Qsi'EREJ @'t convio~ http://www.asilomaraccords.org/glossary.html 11/16/2009 WHY TRANSPARENCY? By Maddie's Fund President, Rich Avanzino Transparency is one of the cornerstones of the Maddie's Fund philosophy. Although transparency in the non-profit world generally refers to financial information, when Maddie's Fund talks about transparency, we are referring to shelter data. Transparency to us means tracking and publicly reporting the outcome of every live dog or cat who crosses the shelter threshold. To achieve transparency, I think shelters should start by collecting and publishing the kind of information contained in the Asilomar Accords Animal Statistics Table. By publish, I don't mean share internally with staff, I mean promote on websites and in newsletters so the whole world can see what's happening. Many shelters say they don't want to publish their statistics because the organization will look bad. If an agency fears looking bad, something is going on -- perhaps it's not getting enough funding to do the job well, or it's not properly supported by other animal welfare groups or the community. But if the organization isn't getting the resources or backing it needs and large numbers of dogs and cats are dying as a result, shouldn't the public know that? Don't we owe it to the animals to tell the community what's taking place in the shelter system, especially in public animal control facilities? Not only does the public have the right to know, but once the information is exposed, there is greater opportunity for solutions to be found to reduce the killing. If the community doesn't know what's happening, it can't help. There was a huge outcry in San Antonio awhile back when the local newspaper revealed a 91% euthanasia rate at Animal Care Services. Angry and embarrassed at their city being labeled one of the worst in the nation for animals, politicians and government officials took immediate action. Among other things, the city bolstered its resource commitment to the animals with a $900,000 budget increase for 2006, and then invited animal welfare groups to participate in the lifesaving effort. As a result, impounds have gone down, adoptions have gone up, and, after just one year euthanasia has dropped to 82%. While some shelters worry that publishing statistics will tarnish their image, other shelters and communities that are leading the way in lifesaving aren't publishing their statistics either. Isn't it time for the leaders of our movement to step forward and set an example? By publishing good statistics, they will spur lifesaving efforts nationwide as shelters across the country strive to reach the bar they have established. In my opinion, real transparency means no fudging allowed. If an organization saved all of its healthy animals except for 25 friendly, healthy pit bulls that were killed because of a local mandate, those animals have to be accounted for and listed as healthy deaths. They can be asterisked (e.g., "the Humane Society saved all of its healthy shelter dogs and cats except for 25 pit bulls who were killed because of a local ordinance prohibiting pit bull placement"). But the organization has to be transparent and account for those deaths. Another situation that tends to go unreported is owner/guardian requested euthanasia. It's not uncommon for shelters to euthanize animals at a guardian's request then exclude them from overall shelter intakes and deaths. In other words, the animals simply don't show up in public records. I expressed my opinion on this topic a few months ago in another editorial. Rather than fearing or fighting transparency, animal welfare organizations should embrace it. When an organization is forthcoming and demonstrates it has nothing to hide, its vulnerability to exposes and allegations is substantially reduced. If there is a problem, the best way to address it is to talk about it. Cover-ups cause people to loose faith and question an organization's honesty. Refusals to disclose information only make people assume the worst. Transparency is a big plus even if an organization is less than perfect, because it allows the community to monitor improvement. Going back to San Antonio, 82% euthanasia is not good, but at least the public can see the agency moving in the right direction. When the public can see that an agency is saving an increasing number of dog and cat lives, it enhances the organization's reputation, which builds community trust, which increases financial support, which saves even more lives -- and the positive momentum keeps building for the animals. To read more Maddie's Fund editorials, go to www.maddiesfiind.org Maddie's Fund -Starter Grants Guidelines Starter Grants Guidelines Related Links . Funded Starter Grants Page 3 of 4 Guided by its mission to revolutionize the status and well-being of companion animals, Maddie's Fund' is devoting its resources to help build a no-kill nation. Towards that end, Maddie's Fund wants to support local coalitions that combine the talents and resources of adoption guarantee organizations, animal control agencies, and traditional shelters to end the killing of healthy and treatable shelter dogs and cats in their communities within 10 years. To help build coalitions, Maddie's Fund has created a new series of grants. Starter Grants offer coalitions monetary assistance as they work on the various components of their community collaborations: collecting shelter statistics; reporting shelter data using termi_ noloay and definitions presented in the Asilomar Accords; preparing yearly business plans; formulating 10-year strategic plans; and developing Pet Evaluation Matrixes. • Community Shelter Data Grant ($10,000 - $40,000) . Business Plan for Saving Lives ($5,000 - $10,000) • Strategic Plan for Saving Lives ($10,000 - $20,000) . Pet Evaluation Matrix ($5,000 - $10,000) These grants can help collaborative efforts by providing a starting point and the tools necessary to help achieve lifesaving goals. Whether your focus is to lead the animal organizations in the community to a no-kill status on your own through local programs and projects, or to use the starter grants to bring the coalition to the point of applying for a Maddie's Fund Community Collaborative Project Grant, these building block grants can help your coalition close the gap between where your community currently is and where you want it to be in the future. ELIGIBILITY Coalitions of animal groups operating in any county, region or state in the United States with a human population of 100,000 or greater are eligible to apply for these grants. Any animal group can apply on behalf of its coalition. Applicants for Maddie's Fund Starter Grants can be animal control agencies traditional shelters, or adoption guarantee organizations. Maddie's Fund Starter Grants must be applied for in order, starting with the Community Shelter Data http://www.maddiesfund.org/Grant_Guidelines/Starter Grants.html 11/16/2009 Maddie's Fund -Starter Grants Guidelines Page 4 of 4 Grant. Coalitions that receive a Community Shelter Data Grant are eligible to apply for a Business Plan for Saving Lives Grant. Coalitions that receive a Business Plan Grant are eligible to apply for a Strategic Plan for Building a No-Kill Community Grant. In addition, coalitions may apply for funding to develop a community-based Pet Evaluation Matrix (Pet Evaluation Matrix Grant). Shelter statistics need to be collected from all groups participating in the coalition. At a minimum, the coalition should include all animal control agencies and all traditional shelters located in the target community. The coalition also needs to provide an opportunity for adoption guarantee organizations located in the target community to participate. Each participating group in the coalition must agree to publish their shelter statistics on their website and in at least one major publication (annual report, newsletter, etc.). Click here to download the complete Starter Grantnt ~uidelines.:~1 Starter Grants Funding Opportunities • Shelter Data Grant Application Instructions . Business Plan Grant Application Instructions . Strategic_.Plan Grant._Applcation__Instructons . Pet Evaluation Matrix Grant Application Instructions Sae Map ~ Grant, Gui_delme.s ~ F.un..ded_„Protects ~ Resource Library ~ No-K.t11 Progress ~ About _Us Facebook ~ Twitter ":"~ Maddie's Fund ~ 2223 Santa Clara Avenue, Suite B ~ Alameda, CA 94501 ~ Fax 510.337.8988 ~ Phone 510.337.8989 ~ info ,maddiesfund org http://www.maddiesfund.org/Grant_Guidelines/Starter Grants.html 11/16/2009 Animal Statistics Table Richmond Community (Richmond SPCA & RAC&C) NAME OF ORGANIZATION: Richmond Animal Care & Control and Richmond SPCA DATE OF REPORT: (January 2008 -.December 2008) SHELTER COUNT 6 ig Cat Total 250 156 406 INTAKE (Live Dogs & Cats Onl ) y From the Pzrblic Healthy Treatable -Rehabilitatable 2209 1522 3731 Treatable -Mana eable 628 443 1071 g Unhealthy & Untreatable 392 177 569 B Subtotal Intake from the Public 117 191 308 Incomin Transfers fro O i i h 3346 2333 5679 g m rgan zat ons wit in Community/Coalition Healthy Treatable -Rehabilitatable 325 452 777 Treatable -Mana eable 138 60 198 g Unhealth & Untreatable 8 1 9 C y Subtotal Intake from Incoming Transfers from Orgs within Community/Coalition 1 1 2 Incoming Transfers from Organizations outside Community/Coalition 472 514 986 Healthy Treatable -Rehabilitatable 445 224 669 Treatable -Manageable 64 4 68 Unhealthy & Untreatable 5 2 7 D Subtotal Intake from Incoming Transfers from Orgs outside Community/Coalition 0 0 0 From Owners/Gzardians Requesting Ezthanasia 514 230 744 Healthy Treatable -Rehabilitatable 0 0 0 Treatable -Manageable 0 0 0 Unhealthy & Untreatable 0 0 0 E Subtotal Intake from Owners/Guardians Requesting Euthanasia 1 0 1 F Total Intake B + C + D + E 1 4333 0 3077 1 7410 G Owncz.'f_iuaniian Rcyuestcd F.•.uthanasia (Unhcalthy & i_'ntre~ttabl~ f)nh't 1 0 I H ADJUSTED TOTAL INTAKE [F minus G] 4332 3077 7409 ADOPTIONS (only dogs and cats adopted by the public) Healthy Treatable -Rehabilitatable 1534 924 2458 Treatable -Manageable 671 723 1394 Unhealthy & Untreatable 165 66 231 I TOTAL ADOPTIONS 26 3 29 2396 1716 4112 OUTGOING TRANSFERS to Organizations within Community/Coalition Healthy Treatable -Rehabilitatable 372 402 774 Treatable -Manageable 81 108 189 Unhealthy & Untreatable 18 3 21 J TOTAL OUTGOING TRANSFERS to Orgs within Community/Coalition 1 1 2 472 514 986 OUTGOING TRANSFERS to Organizations outside Community/Coalition Healthy 98 90 188 Treatable -Rehabilitatable 49 26 75 Treatable -Manageable 36 5 41 Unhealthy & Untreatable 0 0 0 K TOTAL OUTGOING TRANSFERS to Orgs outside Community/Coalition 183 121 304 L RETURN TO OWNER/GUARDIAN 369 50 419 DOGS & CATS EUTHANIZED M N O P Q R S Healthy (Inc/udes Owner/Guardian Requested Euthanasia) Treatable -Rehabilitatable (Inc/udes Owner/Guardian Requested Euthanasia) Treatable -Manageable (Inc/udes Owner/Guardian Requested Euthanasia) Unhealthy & Untreatable (Inc/udes Owner/Guardian Requested Euthanasia) Total Euthanasia M + N + p + p OwneriGuardian Reyiicsted [iuthanasia (L1nh~althv & tlntrcatablc Onh~} ADJUSTED TOTAL EUTHANASIA [Q minus R] 0 193 656 65 914 ~ 913 0 261 149 145 555 0 555 0 454 805 210 1469 ~ 1468 T SUBTOTAL OUTCOMES [I + J + K + L + S] E.rcludes Owner/Guardian Requested Ezthanasia (Unhealthy & Untreatable Only) 4333 2956 7289 U DIED OR LOST IN SHELTER/CARE 19 74 93 V TOTAL OUTCOMES [T + U] Exch~des Owner/Guardian Requested Euthanasia (Unhealthy & Untreatable Only) 4352 3030 7382 W T- ENDING SHELTER COUNT (12/31/08) r-- 230 203 433 ~~, a pcriect wona, the ~natng ~:ount is equal to the t3eginning Count (A) plus Total Intake (F) minus all Outcomes (R+V). -------> 230 203 433 If your reported Ending Count does not match these numbers, please go back through your data and be sure you didn't miss something (i.e., animals in foster, adoptions, transfers, etc.). If all animals have been accounted for and the reported Ending Count is different, please indicate in the comment section. COMMENTS: I agree that in completing this form, we have used the Maddie's Fund definitions of "Healthy," "Treatable - Manageable," "Treatable -Rehabilitatable," and "Unhealthy & Untreatable" as set forth in the attached document titled, "Maddie's Fund® Categorizations/Definitions of Shelter Animals." Signature• Date: ~ V,12~ ~- R i`d ch ti ~ i~ - so REAL ESTATE AND MOBILE HOME TAX RELIEF APPLICATION ~oo~ Office of the Commissioner of the Revenue PO Box 124 Chesterfield, VA 23832-0124 -- Tel.: (804) 748-1281 Fax: (804) 796-3236 y ~,~. Email: cor®chesterfield.gov Web: www chesterfield.laov/comrev Joseph A. Horbal, MCR Commissioner of the Revenue *** All renewal a ax"iD No.: ....Aiiiws llaa .~ ^ ~~~ ~~ Applicant's Q~~j~`~i N~ Name: LaM R~ Middle Address: Date of Birth: Co-applicant's Name: Address: Date of Birth: Soc. Sec. No.: l.aef Rre< M.I. Soc. Sec. No.: Phone: Name(s) as shown on real estate tax bill: Is this property: over one acre? ^ Yes ^ No occupied by the applicant as the sole dwelling? ^ Yes ^ No List the name, relationship, age, and social security number of ALL PERSONS, related to the applicant, not listed above, who occupy the residence. ----~ ~ /~~~~ ~~,~~7%~ ~~e ~~ ~~~~~~,~ ~~, off: ~? ` /~ ~~/~ ~ ~, j vv~'~t/f~~ /~~9~~RA~ ~c~s'7 0~~ s'v~ e~ s7- /1'7~~ ~/~ ~ ~o/I1 ,~~/ ~~' why %~ a`-°R''~~e~~ ~s" • t C..~N ~~`~o'{~ 3 ~~ ~~ ~ !v ~' ~ ~ ~~ ~r-o~ i,d~ ~~~~~ ~~ Real EstJMob. Home Eli able for Tax Reliet Annual Tax to Half '~ 2"O Half Percent. Tax Relisf Granted Balance Due must be filed by April 1, 2009 Phone: For Office Use Only Date Reed Real Estate ^ Elderly [];' Qisabled ^ Mobile Home Check one: ^ Spouse ^ Co-owner ~ l p # TR00 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 17.A. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider Amending the Code of the County of Relating to Voluntary, Mandatory and Emergency Restrictions on Water During Drought and/or Emergency Conditions by Amendin Section 18-151 Through 18-154 and Section 18-158 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: i~~~'~~ G/ Board Action Requested: Chesterfield Use of Public g Article IV, Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached amendments to the Code of the County of Chesterfield relating to Voluntary, Mandatory and Emergency Restrictions on Use of Public Water. Summary of Information: In response to a citizen concern that the current Water Use Ordinance is more restrictive on residential vegetable gardens than established landscaping, Chesterfield County Utilities reviewed the ordinance in its entirety and drafted the attached recommended revisions. A summary of the recommended revisions are as follows: 1) Remove specific reference to vegetable gardens throughout the ordinance and include vegetable gardens in the definition of established landscaping. 2) Empower the County Administrator to declare mandatory water restrictions, without the need to wait for Board Approval. This is more consistent with other regional municipalities and will enable us to issue mandatory water restrictions in a timelier manner and in coordination with our neighboring municipalities. 3) Remove "decorative or landscape fountain" requirements from the ordinance in an effort to minimize the detailed restrictions that have negligible impact on our water supply. Preparers Geora e B. Haves P.E. Title: Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 18-151, 18-152, 18-153, 18-154 and 18-158 RELATING TO RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF PUBLIC WATER BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 18-151, 18-152, 18-153, 18-154 and 18-158 of the Code ofthe Count~o Chesterfield 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 18-151. Declaration of voluntary, mandatory or emergency water use restrictions. The director shall declare voluntary water use restrictions and recommend to the county administrator that he declare mandatory or emergency water use restrictions during periods of extended droughts or other emergency conditions in which available water resources are compromised..nnv a°°~~~~+~°~ ;, f = ra~+°.~. °- ~--------------__ ____~___ Mandatory or emergency water use restrictions will become effective the date the county administrator declares in writing the need for the restrictions Water use restrictions shall be declared to assure maximum beneficial use of available water resources for the public welfare. The director shall use as a basis for declaring or recommending water use restrictions established criteria for reservoir levels and river flows as developed and provided by source-water suppliers. Emergency water use restrictions may also be imposed if the director recommends them based on a determination that an emergency condition of any nature exists that threatens the availability of the public drinking water supply. The director shall likewise nullify, or recommend the nullification of, the water use restrictions when recovered conditions based on established criteria for reservoir levels and river flows are met or when in the director's judgment, the emergency condition has been resolved. Sec. 18-152. Voluntary water conservation measures. Upon the declaration of voluntary water conservation measures, users of the public water system are requested to voluntarily limit their use of public water as follows: ~}~ Paved areas. Limit washing to two days per week. Unrestricted for immediate health and safety concerns. (~}~ Swimming pools. Limit to filling and replenishing to maintain health and safety. f 4}~ Vehicle washing. Non-commercial washing is limited to two days per week using only hand-held hoses with an automatic shut-off nozzle. Commercial vehicle washing businesses are permitted to operate under normal- conditions. (~}~ Established landscaping .Watering is limited to three days per week by address. Addresses ending with an odd number may water only on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. Addresses ending with an even number and locations with no street number may water only on Wednesdays, Fridays and Sundays. Watering is prohibited on Mondays. Watering with buckets of up to five gallons per day is permitted any time. ~~~~~~ 0505:82113.1 {~}~ New landscaping. All watering is permitted for the first ten days after planting. Thereafter, the restriction for established landscaping ~,,a ~~°b *~b~c b~a~ shall apply. Over seeding an existing lawn does not ~ualify as new landscaping -see definitions (-8~6~ Golf courses. Limit watering to 8:00 p.m. to 10:00 a.m. on any day. Greens are exempted from this restriction. ~9-}~7,~ Businesses. Limit to essential use only. (1-A)~8,~Restaurants. No restrictions. H~(9) All other consumption. Conservation by any means encouraged. Sec. 18-153. Mandatory public water use restrictions. Upon the declaration of mandatory public water use restrictions, users of the public water system shall limit their use of public water as follows: (~~ Paved areas. Washing is prohibited except for immediate health and safety requirements. (~}~ Swimming pools. Limit to filling and replenishing to maintain health and safety. All other uses are prohibited. f 4}~ Vehicle washing. Non-commercial washing is limited to one day per week using only hoses with an automatic shut-off nozzle. Commercial vehicle washing businesses are permitted to operate under normal conditions. ~}~ Established landscaping ~~~-glens. Watering is limited to three days per week by address. Addresses ending with an odd number may water only on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. Addresses ending with an even number and locations with no street number may water only on Wednesdays, Fridays and Sundays. Watering is prohibited on Mondays. Watering with buckets of up to five gallons per day is permitted any time. ~}~ New landscaping. All watering is permitted for the first ten days after planting. Thereafter, the restriction for established landscaping ,:.~~~ -~°'-°*~~~° ~-~ a shall apply. Over seeding an existing lawn does not qualify as new landscaping -see definitions ~~ Golf courses. Watering restricted to Tuesday through Sunday between 8:00 p.m. and 4:00 a.m. Greens are exempted from this restriction. F9)~ Businesses. Limit to essential use only. 0505:82113.1 ~®~~~~ ~A)~8,~ Restaurants. No restrictions. {~-~}(9) All other consumption. Conservation by any means encouraged. Sec. 18-154. Emergency public water use restrictions. Upon declaration of emergency public water use restrictions, users of the public water system shall limit their use of public water as follows: (~}~ Paved areas. All water use is prohibited. (~}~ Swimming pools. All water use is prohibited. (~}~ Vehicle washing. All water use is prohibited. {3-}~ Established landscaping aid-ga~e~s. All water use is prohibited. (~}~ New landscaping. All water use is prohibited. (-8)~6,~ Golf courses. All water use is prohibited. {-93~ Businesses. Limit water usage to those essential for business and human hygiene. {~8~~ Restaurants. Water use only for cooking, hygiene and meal beverage. {~}(9) All other consumption. Limit water to essential use only. 000 Sec. 18-158. Definitions. The following words and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meaning ascribed to them below, except in those instances where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Established landscaping. Landscaping plantings, including but not limited to lawns ve etable gardens flowers trees and shrubs existing in an area after such period of time as to accomplish an establishment and maintenance of growth. 000 (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 0505:82113.1 ADVERTISING AFFIDA Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors LN: Water Restrictions 11-4, 1 col x 4.59 in. 11 p~ ~ ~,~ ~ M NOV 2009 Clerk t~ f The Observer, Inc. Publisher of Take notice that the Board of Supervi; of Chesterfield County, Virginia, an adjourned meeting on Wednes November 18, 2009 at 6:30 p.m. in County Public Meeting Room at Chesterfield Administration Build Route 10 and Lori Road, Chesterfi Virginia, will hold a public heazing wl persons may appeaz and present t] views concerning: An Ordinance to amend the Code of County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amens by amending and re-enacting Secti 18-151 through 18-154 and Section 158 relating to voluntary, mandatory emergency restrictions on the use of pu water during drought and/or emerge conditions. A copy of the ordinance is on file in County Administrator's Office and Clerk to the Board's Of&ce (Room ' at the Lane B. Ramsey Administra Building, 9901 Lori Road, Chesterf Virginia, for public examination bety the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. of ~ regular business day. The hearing is held at a public facility designed to be accessible to persons with disabilities. Any persons with questions on the accessibility of the facility or the need for reasonable accommodations should contact Janice Blakley, Clerk to the Board, at 748-1200. Persons needing interpreter services for the deaf must notify the Clerk to the Board no later than Friday, November 13, 2009. CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 11/04/2008 & 11/11/2008 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~'~ r~ , 2009. Legal Affiant day of J e~'' T, Grooms Jr., Notary Public My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission I.D. 7182093 (SEAL) `,, ••„~ ~ ~ ropn n ir~rrr, .,, `` ~ : ~N,YI EAR l , is . ~'~ .~ y• s ~ ~ EXPIRES °, : 7D ' t •Q ; v p~,-23-12 t ~ '. o71b209~ ~ -` •. ~ ..P?~_C~ ''~~~,,,,,rr THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. P.O. Box 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 231 I ~ • Phone: (804 1 14 5-71011 • Fax: (8O4) 7-W-3269 • Email: news@chcstcrticldobserver.com • Internet: www.chesterfieldobserver.com CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 17.B. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendment to Sections 17-1, 17-32, 17-38, 17-63, 19-1, 19-55, 19-56, 19-58, 19-59, 19-264, 19-268, and 19-274 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as Amended, Pertaining to Dam Break Inundation Zones County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ,,!%~~ G/ Board Action Requested: Hold a public hearing to consider amendments to the Code of the County of Chesterfield. Summary of Information: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendment on August 18, 2009, and voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the proposal, with one minor modification to the proposed text (which is incorporated in the attached proposed ordinance language). The 2008 General Assembly passed House Bill 837, which the Governor signed into law. This bill provides localities with the authority to address development in dam break inundation zones, and requires localities to include new provisions within their subdivision and zoning ordinances. These new standards are designed to mitigate hazards of dam failure and resulting flood damage. The proposed amendments would align the county development review process with these new state requirements. Preparers Kirkland A. Turner Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director of Planning ^ No # 00027~D CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA The State Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) has identified 48 existing impoundment structures (dams) across the county that may be subject to dam break inundation zone map provisions. Of these structures, 14 are currently certified by DCR, and will be required to complete dam break inundation map studies upon recertification. The remaining 34 structures have been identified by field verification and will require future DCR certification. There are currently no mapped dam break inundation zones in the county, and the proposed ordinance amendments can only affect properties identified within dam break inundation zone maps filed with the county. DCR will require existing dam owners to prepare dam break inundation zone maps. Once approved by DCR, these maps must be filed with the county. Until such time, the county cannot determine which properties may be included in future inundation zones, since such matters can only be determined by site-specific engineering analysis and modeling. t~~~1'~1 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 17-1, 17-32, 17-38 AND 17-63 RELATING TO DAM BREAK INUNDATION ZONES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 17-1, 17-32, 17-38 and 17-63 of the Code of the Count~of Chesterfield 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 17-1. Purpose of chapter. This chapter is adopted for the following purposes: 000 (i) To promote safety from fire, flood, failure of impounding structures and impacts within dam break inundation zones panic, and other dangers. 000 Sec. 17-32. Procedure for lot subdivision approval. 000 (b) Procedure for approving tentative plats, adjusted tentative plats and tentative renewals. 000 During the tentative plat review process the county shall review the potential impacts of mapped dam break inundation zones in accordance with the provisions of state law. 000 Sec. 17-38. Required information. Written application for approval by the subdivider, shall accompany each submittal of a tentative, substitute, adjusted, or tentative renewal plat. The tentative plat shall be drawn at a scale no greater than one inch equals 50 feet for townhouse subdivisions; other subdivisions shall be at a scale of one inch equals 100 feet. Variations in scale may be made upon request at the discretion of the director of planning. The plat shall show correctly the following information: 000 (d) Basic facts and proposals pertaining to the property including the following shall be graphically shown: 000 17 The location of mapped dam break inundation zones 000 ~oQ~~a2 2723:81270.1 Sec. 17-63. Floodplains and Dam Break Inundation Zones. (a) No land shall be subdivided unless it complies with article III, division 3 of chapter 19 and the Environmental Engineering Reference Manual as determined by the director of environmental engineering. (b) No land shall be subdivided within the boundaries of a mapped dam break inundation zone unless such division complies with the provisions of state law. If the State Department of Conservation and Recreation determines that the plan of development would change the spillway design flood standards of the impounding structure and the proposed subdivision would allow development of three or more residential dwelling units the county shall not permit the subdivision unless' 1. The subdivider agrees to alter the plan of development so that it does not alter the spillway design flood standard required of the impounding structure• or 2. The subdivider submits an approved en ineering study in conformance with the Virginia Soil and Water Conservation Board's standards under the Virginia Dam Safety Act and the Virginia Impounding Structure Regulations and makes the appropriate payment under state law related to the necessary upgrades to the affected impounding structure and administrative fees State law reference -Code of Virginia, § 10.1-606.3, 15.2-2241(3) and 15.2-2243.1 (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. ~®Q2'7,3 2723:81270.1 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 19-1, 19-55, 19-56, 19-58, 19-59, 19-264, 19-268 AND 19-274 RELATING TO DAM BREAK INUNDATION ZONES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 19-1, 19-SS, 19-56, 19-58, 19-59, 19-264, 19-268 and 19-274 of the Code of the Count~of Chesterfield 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 19-1. Purpose of chapter. The purpose of this chapter is to promote the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the public and to accomplish the objectives of Code of Virginia, §§ 15.2-2200 and 15.2-2283. To these ends, this chapter is designed: (1) To provide for adequate light, air, convenience of access, and safety from fire, flood, failure of im oundin structures crime and other dangers or conditions. 000 DIVISION 3. FLOODPLAIN DISTRICTS AND DAM BREAK INUNDATION ZONES* *Cross references: Design standards for subdivisions, § 17-61 et seq.; subdivisions to comply with floodplain management ordinance, §§ 17-65, 17-72; preservation of land for floodplains, § 17-70. *State law reference: Code of Virginia ~ 15 2-2284 Sec. 19-55. Purpose. The purpose of these provisions is to prevent loss of life and property, hazards to health and safety, disruption of commercial and governmental services, extraordinary and unnecessary expenditure of public funds for flood protection and relief and impairment of the tax base by: (a) Regulating uses, activities and development which, acting alone or in combination with other existing or future uses, activities and development will cause unacceptable increases in flood heights, velocities and frequencies, or risk of inundation due to a dam break. (b) Restricting or prohibiting certain uses, activities and development from locating within areas subject to flooding or dam break inundation. (c) Requiring all those uses, activities and developments that do occur in flood prone areas or dam break inundation zones to be protected and/or flood proofed against flooding and flood damage. (d) Protecting individuals from buying lands and structures which are unsuited for intended purposes because of flood hazards or risk of inundation due to a dam break. 2723:81155.1 , ~®®~~4 Sec.19-56. Duties generally of director of environmental engineering. 000 The director of environmental en~ineerin~ shall maintain copies of all mapped dam break inundation zones. 000 Sec. 19-58. Floodplain regulations and dam break inundation zones. (a) General provisions. 000 ,~f~ Reasonable consideration shall be given to protect life and property in mapped dam break inundation zones a~amst impounding structure failure in accordance with state law Sec. 19-59. Applications for variances or modifications to development standards or requirements. The burden of proof rests upon the applicant for a variance or modification to development standards or requirements, and without such proof the request must be denied. The applicant must show, in addition to the requirements contained in sections 19-21 and 19-19, good and sufficient cause; that failure to grant the variance or modification would result in an exceptional hardship; that granting the variance or modification will not result in increased flood heights, additional threats to public safety or extraordinary public expense, create nuisances, cause fraud on or victimization of the public or conflict with existing local laws or ordinances; and that the variance or modification is the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard or risk of dam break inundation, to afford relief. 000 Sec. 19-264. Preparation and submission of site plans. 000 (d) Every site plan shall contain the following information, where applicable: 000 (16) The limit of any established 100-year floodplains and the location of mapped dam break inundation zones; 000 Sec. 19-268. Administrative site plan review process. (a) All site plans which are properly submitted for administrative review in accordance with the county's site plan application and checklist shall be reviewed and recommended for approval or denial by: 000 (4) The director of environmental engineering relative to: 000 b. Flood protection and protection from dam break inundation. ~~~~~~ 2723:81155.1 000 Sec. 19-274. Preparation and submission of improvement sketches. 000 (b) When necessary and applicable, as determined by the director of environmental engineering, every improvement sketch shall be prepared in the following manner and show the following information. 000 (9) The limits of any established 100-year floodplains and the location of mapped dam break inundation zones; (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 2723:81155.1 3 ~~,~ ~ ~ ~~ C ~ ~` "\` O ~ ' ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~` V ~1 _ ~••~ 1 0 -~ ~ 1~ : , ~ ,. L ~ ~ .II. ~. ~ ~. +~ - N ~ ~ '--~~ W ~ ,~ i ~ /S ~ w ~ v Q W ~ ~ '~- f~ ~~ ~:. .1 J • • O w ~~• w ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~' ~~. ~ ~ of ~ ~ _ -~o i ----~-~' J 31 • '~ to ~ ) Q „~=+~ ~ .t; z , a' o j ~~ ~ ~' • w• ~`~ ~ w J o ~ cn •z .~ .~. `` J Y~ c ~ ~ r ,~ ~ ~ ~ ,I lL r~ ~ ~ I - ~ Q O O \ F o ^~ `~~' `~ ~ `_ ~ +~ J ~~' f . t ca ~ ~ l ~ V 'U' ~.~ • ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT ^~~ n..____~__-- . , ,.. us Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors TAKE NOTICE Take notice that the Boazd of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, at an adjourned meeting on Wednesday, November 18, 2009 at 6:30 p.m. in the The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER ~~ RECEIVED C~ ~. -~ LN:InundationZones 11-4, 11 1 col x 7.79 in. ~ `~ $335.7 County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Building, ; Route 10 and Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virginia, will hold a public hearing where persons may appear and .present their views concerning: An ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, by an~ending and re-enacting Sections 17-1, 17-32, 17-38 and 17-63 of the Subdivision Ordinance, and 19-1, 19-55, 19-56, 19-58, 19-59,19-264,19-268,19-274 of the Zoning Ordinance, related to dam break inundation zones. The proposed amendment would include safety from failure of impounding structures and impacts within dam break inundation zones in the subdivision and zoning ordinance purpose statements; require the county to review potential impacts of mapped dam break inundation zones through the tentative subdivision process; require applicants to depict the location of mapped dam break inundation zones on tentative plat applications, site plan applications and improvement sketches; prohibit land subdivision within a mapped dam break inundation zone unless the division complies with state law; expand the purpose of floodplain district provisions to include dam break inundation zones; require the director of environmental engineering to maintain copies of all mapped dam break inundation zones; give reasonable consideration to protection of life and property from impounding structure failure; include risk of dam break inundation as a consideration for floodplain district variances and development standards modifications; and require consideration of protection from This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 11/04/2008 & 11/11/2008 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ I~'` day of NOV~{~2~ , 2009. Legal Affiant Ja ~. T, Grooms Jr., Notary Public My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission I.D. 7182093 (SEAL) „~uui .~~ ~ . ~ ~, i ~~ '~~.t~o~~v1EA(l~ ~~'': ~ :o fX~lRf S o ~-- s ~ ; ~ d2-29-12 ; ~ :• ~7182093 q.4Y THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. P.O. Box 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 23113 • Phone: (8(141 j45-75(H) • Faz: (SOa) 7k1-3269 • F,mail: neH~s@chcsterfieldobserveccom • Internet: www.chestcrfieldobscrcercrnn ,~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 17.C. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Conveyance of Leases of Real Property at Various Park Sites and Athletic Complexes for Operation of Food Concessions by Co-sponsored Athletic Associations and Leagues County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: S Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to hold a public hearing to consider the conveyance of leases of real property for operation of food concessions at various park sites. Summary of Information: Parks and Recreation currently has twelve (12) concession buildings leased to co-sponsored youth sports organizations. The organizations use the concessions for fundraisers and for serving refreshments to spectators. The leases are due to expire on December 31, 2009. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission (PRAC) has recommended award of nine (9) new leases to organizations currently operating the buildings. The lease period will be January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2012, with a three (3) year renewal option. For the other three (3) leases, PRAC has recommended that seasonal permits be issued in lieu of new leases. The three effected concession operators have a smaller volume of sales and operate for only one season per year (typically football season). The Ettrick, Chalkley and Harrowgate Athletic Associations (who currently operate the leased sites) are all in agreement with the recommended change. Attached is a listing of the concession stand sites and the PRAC recommendations for award of leases. Parks and Recreation staff recommends approval. Preparers Michael S. Golden Title: Director, Parks and Recreation Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ti®®q'78 Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Recommended Long Term Concession Lease Renewals Location Or anization Bensley Park .............................................Bellwood Athletic Association Bird Athletic Complex ........................ ..........Chesterfield Youth Softball League Harry G. Daniel Park at Iron Bridge ......... .........Chesterfield Baseball Clubs Harry G. Daniel Park at Iron Bridge ......... .........Central Chesterfield Little League Matoaca Park ................................... .........Matoaca Athletic Association Manchester High School Athletic Complex ......... Chesterfield Little League Robious Athletic Complex ............................Huguenot Little League Rockwood Park ...........................................Chesterfield Baseball Clubs Woodlake Athletic Complex ................. ..........Midlothian Youth Soccer League Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Recommended Change from Long Term to Seasonal Concession Permits Location Organization Chalkley Elementary School ..........................Chalkley Athletic Association Ettrick Park ............................................. Ettrick Athletic Association Harrowgate Park ........................................Harrowgate Athletic Association ~®~~~~ ADVERTISING AFFIDA Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors LN:Concessions 11-11 1 col x 4.375 in. ~101,~~ ~ M NOV 2009 \~ _.: ~~ ~, Cc The Observer, Inc. Publisher of ce notice that the Board of Supervi vember 18, 2009, at 6:30 p.m. in unty Public Meeting Room at esterfield Administration Building, and Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virgi l hold a public hearing where per: acted may appeaz and present t ws to consider: The conveyance of leases of real prop at "various pazk sites and athletic compl for operation of food concessions co-sponsored athletic associations leagues. A copy of the ordinance is on file in County Administrator's Office and Clerk to the Boazd's Office (Room ' at the Lane B. Ramsey Administra Building, 9901 Lori Road, Cheterfi Virginia, for public examination bets the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. of e regular business day. If further informa is desired, please contact Mr. Micl Golden, Director of Parks and Recreat at 748-1079. The hearing is held at a public facility designed to be accessible to persons with disabilities. Any persons with questions on the accessibility of the facility or need fqr reasonable accommodations should contact Janice Blakley, Clerk to the Board, at 748-1200. Persons needing interpreter services for the deaf must notify the Clerk to the Boazd no later than Friday, November 13, 2009. CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 11/11/2008 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ I~ day of ~,~ ;,t~ f 2?vr~ ~7,Pi~/ , 2009. ~~~ Legal Affiant a es T, Grooms Jr., otary Public My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission I.D. 7182093 (SEAL) ~~. ~+ ~i~ g..o~Q~EALI ,~S' y.. `a : ~ ~XPI~ES ° i~1 d ~ v° 42-29-12 ~ . • 1 ~ ~7t8x04' .P_.' V ,, ~' A R Y THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. P.O. Rox 1616, Vlidlo[hian, Virginia 231 I3 • Phone: (804) j45-75tH) • Fax: (804) 744-3269 • Email: news(a~chcsterfieldobservc:ccom • Internet: www.chesterfieldobserveccom CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA ,~o Meetin Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 17.D. Subject: Public Hearing for Consideration of Amendments to Sections 15-121 and 15- 122 Relating to Police Permits for Nightclubs County Administrator's Comments• County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Public Hearing for consideration of amendments to the requirement for police permits to operate nightclubs. Summary of Information: Mr. Warren has asked that the Board of Supervisors set a public hearing to consider limiting the Police Department's permit regulations regarding nightclubs. The County recently cited both County Rib & Ale and Mulligans (both located off of Hull Street Road) for violations of the County ordinance relating to nightclub permits. Both businesses then applied to the Police Department for permits and were denied for failure to comply with the ordinance. The County regulates nightclubs through both the police permitting ordinance and the zoning ordinance. To operate a nightclub in the County, the applicant must first comply with zoning requirements. Nightclubs are a permitted use in the Commercial C-3, C-4 and C-5 districts and in the Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) district. They can also be allowed in certain other districts through the Conditional Use process. The Preparers Steven L. Micas Attachments: ^ Yes Title: County Attorney 1925(00):82526.1( 82529.1 ) ^ No Q®®'~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA applicant must then obtain a permit from the Police Department. The permitting process requires, among other things, a criminal background check on business owners and a review of the application by other County departments. The current ordinance requires the applicant to disclose all felony and misdemeanor convictions. If a conviction involves a felony or a crime of moral turpitude, the permit is denied. The proposed amendment would limit grounds for denial to convictions for felonies or any crime involving moral turpitude within a ten-year period prior to the application. In addition, since a permit can already be revoked for fraud, misrepresentation or false statements within the application process, the ordinance has been clarified to indicate that the permit can also be denied for the same reasons. 1925:82706.1(82529.2) C~©011 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 15-121 AND 15-122 RELATING TO NIGHTCLUBS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 15-121 and 15-122 of the Code of the Count~of Chesterfield 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read as follows: ARTICLE VI. NIGHTCLUBS AND OTHER ADULT ENTERTAINMENT DIVISION 1. NIGHTCLUBS Sec. 15-121. Nightclub permit required from chief of police--Application; issuance. (a) Every person desiring a business license to operate a nightclub, as defined in chapter 6, shall first apply to the chief of police, or his designee, for a permit to conduct such activity. Each such application shall be accompanied by a fee in the amount of $25.00. (b) Information required on the permit application shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) The applicant's full name, age, sex, race, weight, height, hair and eye color, address, telephone number, date and place of birth and social security number; (2) Names and addresses of references; (3) Whether the applicant has been convicted of any ~ felony or ii misdemeanor and, i€se; for any such felonies or misdemeanors the nature of the offense, when and where convicted, and the penalty or punishment assessed; (4) Photograph and fingerprints of applicant; and (5) Name and address of the business for which a permit is sought. (6) Written authorization to conduct a background investigation of the applicant, including a criminal records check, and to investigate whether the information provided by the applicant is true. (7) Written declaration, dated and signed by the applicant, certifying that the information contained in the application is true and correct. (c) For a corporation, partnership or other legal entity, "applicant" includes each officer, director, partner or principal of the entity and any managers of the business. (d) The applicant shall not be issued a permit if the county's investigation or the information furnished in compliance with this article shows that the applicant ~ has been convicted of a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude within ten prior to Hermit apt,lication:l,,,~ ~.oo., ao.,;oa ., ..o.....,;+ ,,..1, >n a •+ 1 a a + ~.. a• - 1- y ~u au= ---~- ___ ~~~~~_~~ ~~ ~__~ Y= iii) in the application process committed fraud or made anv misrepresentation or anv false statement or iii is not of good moral 1925(00):82529.2 1 ®~~~e2 character. In addition, each application shall be reviewed by the county departments charged with enforcing the business license, zoning, building, plumbing, utility, health, electric and fire prevention codes, as needed, and no permit shall be issued if the applicant's business in the county does not comply with these and any other applicable county or state laws or regulations. (e) Any changes in the ownership or principals of the business entity to which the permit is issued or in the managers of the business itself will automatically make the permit void. Such changes shall be reported to the chief of police or his designee, and a new application nay must be submitted for review. (f) Nightclubs shall be subject to the regulations regarding public dance establishments, set forth in chapter 3. Sec. 15-122. Same--Revocation. (a) The chief of police or his designee may revoke or suspend any permit issued pursuant to this article (i) for fraud, misrepresentation or any false statement contained in the application; (ii) upon conviction of the applicant for any felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude after the permit is issued; (iii) for failure to comply with the provisions of this article; or (iv) if the applicant's business fails to comply with applicable county or state laws or regulations. (b) If the chief of police or his designee revokes a permit, he shall notify the permittee in writing of such action, the reasons for the revocation, and the permittee's right to request a hearing. To receive a hearing, the permittee must make a written hearing request which must be received by the chief of police, or his designee, within ten days of the date of the revocation notice. If a timely hearing request is not received by the chief of police, or his designee, the decision shall be final. If a hearing is properly requested, it shall be held within ten days from receipt of the hearing request. The hearing shall be presided over by the chief of police or his designee. The permittee shall have the right to present evidence and argument or to have counsel do so. Within a reasonable time after the hearing, the chief of police, or his designee, shall render his decision which shall be final. The permittee must discontinue operation of its business when the decision to revoke the permit becomes final. (c) When protection of public health, safety or welfare requires such action, the chief of police, or his designee, may immediately revoke a permit issued under this article by so stating in a written notice to the permittee. When action is taken pursuant to this subparagraph, the permittee shall immediately discontinue operation of its business, but shall have the right to a hearing as stated in subparagraph (b). (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. ~ ®~'~ ~.~ i92s(oo>:a2s29.2 Your Community Newspaper ,Since 199.5 P.O. Box 1616. Midlothian, Virginia 23113 • Phone: (i{0-11 ~-1i-7iU0 • Fax: (80d) 714-3369 • Emuil: news@chesterfi~l '„h>rnrr.cnm • Intrrner www.chcsterficldobsrrvcr.com ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors TAKE NOTICE Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, at an adjourned meeting on Wednesday, November 18, 2009 at 6:30 p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Building, Route 10 and Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virginia, will hold a public hearing where persons may appear and present their views concerning: An Ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, by amending and re-enacting Sections 15-121 and 15-122 relating to nightclub permits. A permit applicant must disclose all felony and misdemeanor convictions and, if a conviction involves a felony or a crime of moral turpitude, the permit is denied. The amendments would limit grounds for denial for convictions to felonies or any crime involving moral turpitude within a ten-year period prior to the application. The amendments would also delete denials of previous applications as grounds for denial of a current application. Finally, since a permit can already be revoked for fraud, misrepresentation or false statements within the application process, the ordinance has been clarified to indicate that the permit can also be denied for the same reasons. A copy of the ordinance is on file in the County Administrator's Office and the Clerk to the Boazd's Office (Room 504) at the Lane B. Ramsey Administration Building, 9901 Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virginia, for public examination between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. of each regular business day. The hearing is held at a public facility designed to be accessible to persons with disabilities. Any persons with questions on the accessibility of the facility or the need for reasonable accommodations should contact Janice Blakley, Clerk to the Board, at 748-1200. Persons needing interpreter services for the deaf must notity the Clerk to the Board no later than Friday, November 13, 2009. LN:Nightclubs 11-4, 11 1 col x 6.03 in. ^~~ co _ ,. ~ t-_~, ,._ The Observer:~~iac. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 11/04/2008 & 11/11/2008 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~' ' "' day of U~e~~n{2e-~ , 2009. L gal Affiant J es T, Grooms Jr., Notary Public My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission LD. 7182093 (SEAL) . ~• ~ ; a EXPV~ES c ; ~ 1: `t ~ ~' 02-29-12 ; ~ - ~' ~nazos3 ~ = t TA,4Y THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 17.E. Subiect: Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance to Amend Section 14-10 of the County Code Relating to Shooting Arrows from Bows Near Buildings County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors has set a public hearing for today to consider an ordinance to amend section 14-10 of the County Code relating to shooting arrows from bows near buildings. Summary of Information: Current law allows property owners or anyone with their permission to use bows to hunt on their property so long as the arrow would not cross the property line. In addition, due to the growth in the deer population in the county, the state department of Game and Inland Fisheries authorizes additional bow hunting through the use of site specific "kill permits". These Game and Inland Fisheries authorizations can allow bow hunting on property which is adjacent to or within residential neighborhoods. Several citizens have expressed concern about their personal safety when bow hunting is permitted close to their residences or neighborhoods. It is considered dangerous to permit bow hunting in areas in the county which are heavily populated due to the increased risk of personal injury. The attached amendment to section 14-10 of the county code prohibits the use of a Preparers Steven L. Micas Title: County Attorney 0800:82557.1(79894.1) Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # C~~~~~4 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA bow and arrow for hunting in the same areas in which discharge of a firearm is prohibited i.e., within 600 feet of a another's dwelling, business establishment, public building, public gathering or public meeting place, but the county is not required to use the same 600 feet restriction that is used for firearms. Mr. Gecker has suggested that a 150 foot restriction may be more appropriate for bows and arrows. Included in the proposed ordinance is an exemption from this prohibition which is required under state law under § 15.2-1209. This exemption allows bow hunting in an otherwise prohibited area, but only if the bow hunting is specifically authorized by the state department of Game and Inland Fisheries to thin the deer population and then only on properties zoned agricultural that are two acres or greater. Mr. Gecker requested that this item be prepared in order to address concerns expressed to him by county citizens from the Salisbury area. 0800:82557.1(79894.1) O 7J ~J~ ~ ~ J AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 14-10 RELATING TO DISCHARGING FIREARMS OR SHOOTING ARROWS FROM BOWS NEAR BUILDINGS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 14-10 of the Code of the CountLof Chester field, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 14-10. Same--Discharging firearms or shooting arrows from bows. (a) No person shall discharge any firearm or shoot an arrow from an~within the county within 600 feet of a (i) dwelling of another; (ii) business establishment; (iii) public building; (iv) public gathering; or (v) public meeting place. (b) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000.00. (c) As to firearms, Tthis section shall not apply to a (i) law-enforcement officer in the performance of his official duties; (ii) any person whose discharge of a firearm is justifiable or excusable at law in the protection of life or property; (iii) the discharge, on land of at least five acres that is zoned for agricultural use, of a firearm for the killing of deer pursuant to Code of Virginia, § 29.1-529; (iv) the discharge of a firearm that is otherwise specifically authorized by law; (v) the discharge of black powder firearms using blanks as part of historical re-enactments, historical living history programs and historical demonstrations; (vi) the discharge of starter blank weapons to initiate athletic competitions; or (vii) ceremonial and patriotic displays. As to shooting arrows from bows, this section shall not apply to shooting an arrow from a bow for the killing of deer pursuant to Code of Virginia ~ 29.1-529 on land of at least two acres that is zoned for agricultural use. ~ For purposes of this section, "bow" includes all compound bows crossbows lop bows and recurve bows having a peak draw weight of 10 pounds or more. The term "bow" does not include bows that have a peak draw of less than 10 pounds or that are desi ned or intended to be used principally as toys. The term "arrow" means ashaft-like projectile intended to be shot from a bow. State law references-Similar provision, Code of Virginia ~ 15.2-1209 authority of county to prohibit outdoor shooting of firearms or arrows from bows in certain areas. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. ~~~~ ~~ 2723:79894.1 ^~-~ ~ b _- - ~` ~~ ADVERTISING AFFIDAVI M Nov 2009 ~ ~,,:~~ vsor~ Chesterfield County LN:ShootingArrows 11-4, 11 1 col x 4.25 $207.61 Board of Supervisors The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER notice that the Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County, Virginia, at adjourned meeting on Wednesday, ember 18, 2009 at 6:30 p.m. in the mty Public Meeting Room at the ~sterfield Administration Building, ite 10 and Lori Road, Chesterfield, ;inia, will hold a public hearing where sons may appear and present their Ns concerning: Ordinance to amend the Code of the anty of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, amending and re-enacting Section 14- relating to shooting azrows from bows ~r buildings. :opy of the ordinance is on file in the unty Administrator's Office and the irk to the Board's Office (Room 504) the Lane B. Ramsey Administration ilding, 9901 Lori Road, Chesterfield, ~ginia, for public examination between hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. of each ;ulaz business day. e hearing is held at a public facility siggned to be accessible to persons with sabilities. Any persons with questions the accessibility of the facility or the ed for reasonable accommodations ould contact Janice Biakley, Clerk to e Boazd, at 748-1200. Persons needing terpreter services for the deaf must notify e Clerk to the Board no later than Friday, ovember 13, 2009. This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 11/04/2008 & 11/11/2008 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ ~ ~ day of Iv U~Q'v''°~,e'~ , 2009. Legal Affiant J es T, Grooms Jr., Notary Public My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission I.D. 7182093 (SEAL ., ;•'~~ G R ~ '''• ~ ~ .t4 l~; ~~ `, ~ ; o EXPIRET o~; ~ 'd : ~' C2-29-1i : . ~' '. ;i182G4~ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. RO. Box 1616. ~tidlothiao, Virginia 23113 • Phone: (804) X45-75(~ • Fax: (8(}4) 744-3269 • Email: news@chestcrfieldobserveccom • lntemet: www.chesterfieldobserveccom ~ ICe ~~~- ~ ~~ w ~. - ~ h~~ 1-~~,. Ne~~~ ~S I ~ ~ S,Pea der ~'~ BOW HUNTING IN VIRGINIA FACTS AND FIGURES 1) The statistics regarding archery and firearm hunting accidents in Virginia covers the last ten years, from January 1,1998 to December 31, 2008. There were no reported accidents of any type while archery hunting during this period. Unfortunately, there were 427 firearms related accidents resulting in 44 deaths. Of these,133 were self inflicted versus another hunter or individual. 2) There have been 220 reported deer /motor vehicle accidents in Chesterfield County during calendar year 2009. Sixty eight of these have occurred in October alone. Usually, a significant number of deer accidents are not reported. 3) One doe deer is typically responsible for approximately thirty deer in five years. Thank you Mother Nature! 1) Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Hunter Education Program, Ms Dee Buchanan 2) Chesterfield County Police Department, Media, Ms Ann Reid 3) NCSU, School of Forestry Archery Deer Seasons Early Antlerless-Only Archery Season: During this season only antlerless deer may be taken. September 5 -October 2: • In Fairfax, Loudoun and Prince William counties (except on Department-owned lands). Archery Either-Sex Deer Hunting: • Deer of either sex may be taken full season during the eazly and late archery seasons, unless otherwise noted below. - Only antlered deer may be taken during the early and late archery deer seasons on PALS (Public Access Lands) in Dickenson County. Early Archery Season: October 3-November 13: Statewide Late Archery Seasons: November 3Q`January 2: • In all areas west of the Blue Ridge (except Clarke and Floyd counties and on private lands in Frederick County). • In the counties (including the cities and towns within) of Amherst (west of Rt. 29), Bedford, Campbell (west of Norfolk Southern Railroad), and Nelson (west of Rt.151). • On the Chester F. Phelps WMA and on National Forest lands in Frederick County. December 1 January 2: • In the cities of Chesapeake, Suffolk (east of the Dismal Swamp line), and Vnginia Beach. December 14-January 2: • In the counties (including the cities and towns within) of Floyd, Franklin, Henry and Patrick. ~~ PerlkaNeeller In 1997,the Department initiated a statewide bowhunter surveytoobtain information on beardeerturkeysmalf game,andfurbearerpopulations. Deerdatacollected providesimportantinformatwn relativetodeerpopulation trends,adultsexratios,andreuuitment Approximately 300 archers have participated in the past few years. The Departmentwould liketo increasethe numberand distri- bution ofcooperators across the Commonwealth. ffyou would like to participate in this survey, please indicate your interest and send your mailing address to mikefies@ dgifvirginia.gov. Partidpants will receive an annual survey form to complete during the early archery deer season and a copy of the results after they are compiled. The. Department appreciates your interest and cooperation. U~rbche~~r Deer easons: E'' Ifuring this season o y antler ess eer may be taken. ~ September 5-October 2 and January 4-March 27: • Within the incorporated limits of the cities of Colonial Heights, Danville, Emporia, Franklin, Fredericksburg, Lynchburg, Martinsville, Radford, Richmond, Staunton, Winchester and the towns of Altavista, Amherst, Blacksburg, Chtistiansburg, Farmville, Independence, Kenbridge, Pulaski, Purcellville, Richlands, Rocky Mount, Saltville, Tazewell, West Point and in Fairfax County. Lists of properties available for hunting are not maintained by the Department or local governments. • Go to www.HuntFyshVA.com/hunting/urban-archery for local restrictions and other urban archery information. Legal Methods and Restrictions During Archery Deer Seasons: Special restrictions may apply during this season. See Legal Use of Firearms andArchery Equipment, pg.13 and Local Fnearms Ordinances, pg.17 for details. • Archery tackle (including crossbows) only. • Broadhead widths must be atleast'/e-inch wide or expand upon i ' ~ impact to /a -inch. ~ Bows must be capable of propelling a Broadhead arrow at least ~ 125 yards. • • It is unlawful to use explosive head arrows or arrows to which any drug, chemical ortoxic substance has been added. • It is unlawful to use dogs. • • It is unlawful to have a firearm in possession (see exception for valid concealed handgun permit holders on page 14) except that a muzzleloading firearm, as defined in the muzzleloader deer sea- sonssection, may also be in possession when andwhere there is an overlap with a muzzleloading deer 'season where deer hunting Ei1 with a rifle or muzzleloading firearm is permitted. Munleloader Deer Seasons Early Mu~leloader Season: October 31~Tovember 13: • In all areas where deer hunting with a rifle or muzzleloading firearm is permitted unless noted in the season exception listed below. Season Exception: - Closed in the cities of Chesapeake, Suffolk (east of the Dismal Swamp line), and Virginia Beach. Either-sex Deer Hunting Days East of the Blue Ridge: October 31-November 13 (full season): In all areas (including Occoneechee State Park) unless other- wise noted below. -November 7: On State Forest lands, State Park lands (except Occoneechee State Park),Department-owned lands, and Philpott Reservoir. -Antlered deer only-no either-sex deer hunting days: On National Forest lands in Amherst, Bedford and Nelson counties. 3~ Hunting and Trapping in Virginia wv i ~E ~~ Increase in Deer /Auto Accidents in Virginia r!'AAA # accidents Source: State Farm Insurance (# accident claims extrapolated based on market share) Number of Cases of Lyme Disease in Virginia Lyme Disease Spread by Deer Ticks # cases Source: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/lyme/Id rptdLymeCasesbyState.htm 2005 2006 2007 2008 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 In'~ I C ~ q e ~ ~v ~ Su ~ - SQe~ ke~'~ ) (r ~u .~ 1 ~~c: N r~,r,7r~ i~~' n ~ ~ ~ CD rp ~ ~ CD ~ -~ ~,, - • .. to CD ~ ~ ~ n ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~+ ~ O 0 C CD G CD~ O -t, C/~ N DD O 2 r-r ~~ 0~ `~~ Y <~ ~' ~~ _ ~. k-~~ ~; y ~ `' ` ~, ki IF ~ ~ ~ '~-,'s.. •t _ \; ~ a, , t ~R ~~ \ `~ . ~~ ~. r. tT II: }" •S ~. t CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~' AGENDA Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 17.F. Subject: Public Hearing: Consider the Leasing of County Property at the Chesterfield Airport County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Approve the leasing of property at the Chesterfield Airport to ITT Corporation in a form approved by the County Attorney and Virginia Department of Aviation. Summary of Information: Staff is requesting that the Board authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator to execute a lease agreement with ITT Corporation at no cost for the construction of a tower and installation of Surveillance and Broadcast Services (SBS) equipment, FAA's first major step in the next generation of air traffic control. There will be no cost to the county for installation and maintenance of this equipment. The site to be leased is a 25' by 25' area adjacent to the terminal. A public hearing is required to lease county property. Approval is recommended. DIStrICt: Dale Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ~~0~ ~~ 0 0 ® `~ s• HIGN cwuN uNK FENCE aW., ~c o ~• ' ~N' ~~ /~ GATE ®~'` ~ . ~ ® y o ~a 11~C~EMS MAREW GENERATOR O TERMNrAL BUILDING AIRPORT APRON ~ SITE SKETCH ~' SS1 scALE: NONE s °1°! PROJECT NAME : GATE : si 13 `I e.... ~LJC~' ~,,,~ CHESTERF~;~1. AIRPORT ~ Br : ~ 1 T T K C I 7511 AIRFIELD DRIVE ap ,~ ~, ;,~130.~ RICHMOND, VA 23237 ~,,,,,,,,d,F„ ~~~~ ~~ ii m ~ RED FM LJGFR PER F M R R N ENTS E OW E (P~ ( ~ g ~ ~ p ) SOP UGIiT" O 68't AGL ~~ D ~ TOP OF LIGHTNING RODS O 70' AGL (TYP. OF 3) ANTENNA CENTERLINE 272.32' AMSL TOP OF TOWER 26x.12' At~ISL PROPOSED DB SYSTEM Q 5100J1-D ANTENNAS ~. 4) I p~p~p Gp~~ I QVW161ICS VERTEX 101V I ~~~ c~ I PROPOSED 80'-0' TALL MONOPOLE N C I PR ~POINTERIOR O O I O T x I I 1 I TOWER I I I _ (Blf OTHERS) GROUNp ELEVATION 208.12' AMSL ~ TOWER ELEVATION S53 SCALE: NONE ~ PROJECT NAME : DATE : 9 13 200li u CHESTE I JC -01~ AIRPORT D S V1 '' ,L ~ 5 8 ~ ~ : ~ J I T T K C 1 7511 AIRFIELD DRIVE RICHMOND VA 23237 rcp Joe No.:leoool3s.o2 , B~rgrai.n,id ~, U1~r ~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~• r~ Yow C'urnralurin h'rw ++u~f•rr .Sinrr fW ~ P.f 1. FS:n 1 PI A. Mutl ixhlan. Vn4~ma 3i E 11 . lT~xw~: ~ xlh l ty9: ! u Ip • Far: S x[µ~ "+i- i?!v~ • F.m:ul: nrr•IQu chcu~rllrlJoMrncecnm • hxc nk c r•v, wx~e Jcr7irVdnhacr.•cca+m AbVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Site Cost (per issue) C'lxslerfirld C'twnty LN;C'hrsterfield Airport I1-l 1 112pP 5175,W Rilht of Vday The Obscn•cr, lnc. Publisher of CHFSTFRFIF.LD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Obsen•er in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, nn ua~t~olttc~ the following date(s): 1 Il111Z0dB Thet as tlovemba ld, wag. M 6.80 p.~w. Or M eOOe Stlefaa~lf u Mai ba heard. ewa tioMd ~ Supee.feon ~ t~cwerfietd Cor~nr et .n :e~rlar ts pl.a in dte Pu61ic ~ 1Looea[~atte~5dd Pswnq. Vir~ai; wdu eenrYder dle ler~et afCaualt praQatp atChMlaiAeld AteloeC ~s r~AU~~aM D~e1~~ ~ ~l~ ~ k aoA Eik is dae ottwae d dr [kat [~o4ertr Maeyer M CYeahA[~ Care~K Yh~N. and ~r he aaydeell ~ alt laereeeed vvarliea between r1N hoer of k30 aan. and S90 m. alaw8ry 16mrd~ ~• 'the heatin{~ is hcW a! a public fadiil7r ~~qq~~,~QQ rn yr .mribk to penoar wlt3 ditaGiitlea. Ae~ penaae MIb 9~xepaoa oa the aotapibllie}' of die facibttyy ar n~eed far ..~on,.6L~eeeruu~odeetoaa ehoaW wntact Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ 1 ~~ ~~ dh/C~I ~'i~ , 2009. s~it'~7 Legal Affiant day of X ' ~ y1w.~ J ~ , Grooms Jr., Votary Public JaMce 6. (llallgS (lerkto~eBaawLar7~d- t ~, "~„~~' ~s My commission expires: I'ebniary 29, 2012 Bwlranohlee<~~lee.~baa~.a0°9• Commission 1,D. T182093 {SEAT.) ,,~•'•q. , .....QZs .o ,~y,ao~,~lEa~fs.~~ 4'sI ~ ;o!' E~ttif S ~+t ~ < ev ~•k-2l-u ~ '. aT112G9• _ _ ,,~~Ul~ ,q,T THIS 15 NQT A B1I.I.. Pi.F.ASE PAY FRO17 IN~'O1CF.. THANK YUU. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ,:„ Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 17.G. Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domain for the Acquisition of Water and Temporary Construction Easements for the Jahnke Road Waterline Replacement Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: n Authorize the County Attorney to proceed with eminent domain for the acquisition of water and temporary construction easements for the Jahnke Road Waterline Replacement Project and authorization to enter and take such easements prior to eminent domain proceedings. Summary of Information: Staff has been negotiating for acquisition of 15' and variable width permanent water and 10', 11' and variable width temporary construction easements for the Jahnke Road Waterline Replacement Project. The following offers have been made and refused or not responded to: Joseph E. Chodkiewicz and Cheryl J. Frydrychowski, 1407 Buford Road, PIN: 757713173100000, $2,665.00; John and Rachel Burgett, 8128 Jahnke Road, PIN: 758713625700000, $375.00; Heather Ann Van Ness, Lisa Marie Hall, Sara Nicole Hall, Heirs of Irvin Clemmons Hall, 7909 Jahnke Road, PIN: 760713533900000, $100.00; Patricia L. Stansbury, 7800 Epic Road, PIN: 761713510600000, $25.00. It is necessary to proceed with the use of eminent domain for the health and safety of the public. Staff will continue to negotiate with the owners in an effort to acquire the easements. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # VICINITY SKETCH PUBLIC HEARING: Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domain for the Acquisition of Water and Tempot•aty COltstl'ltctlott Easements for the Jahnke Road Waterluie Replacement Project OR p T N ~~ ~ Z ~ ~' {~D ~""~~m~ ~,~JA ~.1 R r ~ U ~N N CFrestafietl Cwinty De~artrna~t of UtiRies . w E s 1 Ypl ~ IOS.37 4Et ®~~~~ VICINITY SKETCH PUBLIC HEARING: Consider the Exercise of Eminent Doinaui foi• the Acquisition of Water and Teinpor~uy Consflvrtion Easements for the Jahnke Road Waterline Replacement Project z ~ ~ ~ ~' o 8428 Jahnke.Road Joli~ ar~d F~achei Burgett J N Cheatafie!tl Courrty De~aartma+t of Unties MI E S ~ roe -zaaai leer VICINITY SKETCH PUBLIC HEARING: Consider the Exercise of Emuient Doinaut foi• the Acquisition of ~'atei• and Tempoi•aiy Conshuction Easements foi• the Jahnke Road ~'Vaterluie Replacement Project 7909JIJiNKE ROAD HEIRS.i~ IRVIN GL6MMONSHr4lL PC N Chestafieid Caurriy Departrnett of lkiRies w E s 1 YAC~ ~ 16G67 4!t VICINITY SKETCH PUBLIC HEARING: Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domaut foi• the Acquisition of Water and Temporary Construction Easements for• the Jahnke Road Waterline Replacement Project T:~~ i~# P!~r~ ~. BA~~~~ PIC RD N Ctiestafield County Depertrnait of Utilities ~ E ~ 1 Mpi -16467 Ret ~~~~ ~~ PLAT PREPARED BY: PLAT OF A 95' WATERLINE & PRECISION MEASUREMENTS, INC. 1O' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION 2116 DABNEY ROAD su1TE e5 EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF RICHMOND, VA 23230 JOSEPH E. CHODKIEWICZ & 804-340-5229 CHERYL J. FRYDRYCHOWSKI MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT -CHESTERFIELD CO. VIRGINIA o~~~~,Tx OF Lr~ ~ ~~ '~ I M. LONG x ° o, a 002 r Y~~ ~~~0 suR~E~o DALE, ®LLY C. D.B. 6763, PG. 434 GPIN# 757713304600000 1410 LOGAN STREET PHAN, DUNG & LONG, HUYNH, ANH-DAO DB 7272, PG 84 GPINJf 757713353800000 1400 LOGAN STREET EXISTING 16' WATER EASEMENT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY DB 2264, PG 1038 m c .- ~. o o ' ~° ~ ~~ ` 1~ o ~~ ~ o ~ ,~ ~1 ~ _ ~ ~ 2 ~1' ~~~ ~ ~'~~ m 1 l ~ 21 ~ ~ W BULLOCK, GARLAND B. ' D. B. 2245, PG. 1212 GPIN 7577 i 312400000 1415 BUFORD RD. ~ E OpKIEWIC FRYpRYCH~WSKI ~~HERYt. 52p5, Pp 3~ p00pp ~B 5~713~~ RpAD a 0 w ~ . ~'"/ N:3713311.66 E:11757288.18 pplN~p~ g~F~Rp ~ i i ~ ,~ R1w RTE 68 `' KE RpA~ 1 P~,N 1320_p1 N: 1 4 ~p`H R~W PER ~' PG• 389 _ / ~ 10' TEMPORARY E:11757119.68 50 0.6• , / ~ CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT / ~ 0.050 ACRES _ / 2179.8 S0. FT. 15' WATERLINE / EASEMENT / 0.065 ACRES 2820.9 S0. FT. ~ SOM~R gtZ~oP~ LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 64 24'58" E 26.85' L2 N 68'40'56" E 191.73' L3 S 18'35'31" E 10.01' L4 S 68'40'56" W 195.59' L5 N 64'24'58" W 21.79' L6 N 1T38'S0" W 13.73' L7 S 64'24'58" E 20.51' L8 N 68'41'25" E 180.86' L9 N 18'35'31" W 15.02' 0' S0' 100' 150' SCALE: 1"=50' JAN. 28, 2009 COUNTY PROJECT 01 ~ ~ PLAT PREPARED eY~ PLAT OF A WATERLINE & PRECISION MEASUREMENTS, INC. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 2116 DABNEY ROAD ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF SUITE B5 RICHMOND, VA 23230 JOHN & RACHEL BURGETT 804-340-5229 MIDLOTHIAN MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY,VIRGINIA O~~~p,1,TH OF Gj'~ ~ ~~ p RIAN M. LONG ~ Lic. No. a 02372 ' ' SURD / t ~ I ` ~ I ~ w 1 ~ ? I \ ~ ~z. ~~~'o I ~ ~z ~ < I ` '" v rn~~o ~ ~m ~ N y I v ~ ~~ ~ ~F.° I 1 ~~etl1 <~`Vlf A a ~ ~ ( BURGETT, JOHN & .RACHEL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o~ \ D.B. 8268, PG. 446 \ ~ ~ J"~~ o g ~' ~ GP1N# 758713625700000 ` ^ ~,"~ Z~ ` 8128 JAHNKE ROAD ' ~ o ~"-'` v'" ~ m~ o ~o ~ ~ Am ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ \ 1 VARIABLE WIDTH WATERLINE EASEMENT ~ ` ~ ` ` ~ \ '~ 0.013 ACRES ` 581.3 S0. FT. 10' TEMPORARY N ~y ,~ ~ CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT TO g f 46 W 1g 0.028 ACRES `~ [LE4U pR~ ~ [ 1203.6 S0. FT. N:3713460.04 [3 [ )per ~ ~ E:11758597.20 / RAW ~ o\ C6 '~h'N/rF R [ i ~~ ~, N:37 6O;4R~JY ,~, RTF ~ C2 E:11758772.65 0' S0' 100' 150' 686 C1 ' ` ~ SCALE: 1 "=50' LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 20'53'53" E 13.01' L2 S 75' 13'39" E 63.41' L3 S 76'57'46" E 7.50' L4 N 12'53'11" E 8.75' L5 N 1753' 11 " E 1.25' L6 S 7T06'49" E 99.28' LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L7 S 79'52'04" E 22.05' L8 S 79'52' 14" E 17.83' L9 N 20'53'53" W 11.67' l10 S 7T06'49" E 48.64' Lt 1 S 7T06'49" E 99.52' CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING DELTA ANGLE rt tsn~ ~~' 9.04' 2.04' N 79'54'09" W 00'04'10" JAN. 28, 2009 COUNTY PROJECT 01-0199 ~~~~ ~'~ PLAT PREPARED 8Y: PRECISION MEASUREMENTS, 2116 DABNEY ROAD SUITE 85 RICHMOND, VA 23230 o~~~pyTH OF r~Gi p RIAN LONG ~ U No. a 02372 ~~pk \' ~~ qN SUR~~yO JAHNKE INC. PLAT OF A 30' X 7 7' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF -RVIN C. HALL MIDLOTHIAN MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA ROAD ^' RTE 686 80' R/W a 0 w E:11760570.32 S 8T59' W 1,999' TO N 8406'35" E BROWN ROAD R~W 70,00' ~ L 1 30'x 11 ' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 0.008 ACRES 330 S0. FT. BETHEA, CHARLES E HALL, IRVIN C DB 3770, PG 648 DB 6645, PG 586 GPIN# 760713433900000 GPIN 760713533900000 7917 JAHNKE ROAD >~ Lor 16 (A PART) 7909 JAHNKE ROAD A.F. JANKE PLACE LOT 15 (A PART) P. e. 7, Pc. 121 A.F. JANKE PLACE P.B. 7, PG. 121 r N DUNNING, LYNDA K DB 1411, PG 440 N~! 760713634000000 X90 f JAHNKE ROAD LOT 14 (A PART) A. F. JANKE PLACE P.B. 7, PG. 121 LINE TABLE 0' 30' 60' 90' SCALE:1 "=30' LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 N 84'06'35" E 30.00' L2 S 05'53'25" E 11.00' L3 S 84'06'35" W 30.00' L4 N 05'53'25" W 11.00' JAN. 28, 2009 COUNTY PROJECT 01-0199 PLAr PREPARED eY: PLAT OF A VARIABLE WIDTH PRECISION MEASUREMENTS, INC. 2116 DABNEY ROAD TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT SUITE B5 RICHMOND, ~A 23230 ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF 804-340-5229 PATRICIA L. STANSBURY MIDLOTHIAN MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~Q,j,TH 01y, ~ ~~ f~ ~ ~ , p RIAN M LONG Z U Lic No. a ~ 2372 ~,9 i ~~ o~ y ~ 0 SURNE JAHNKE ROAD ^' RTE 686 VAR. WID 1H R/W `N N:3713605.16 :11 4. - --- RAW --------- ~ --- - ~ l2 \ L L'~ N 8T54' E 590' \ i \ \ L6 TO SOUTHAM DRNE \ \ \ \ \ OQ ~ G~\ I I i ~ \ d' \ \ 1 VARIABIE WIDTH TEMPORARY ~ O~ \ ~ ~~ ~y \ I ' \ CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT \ ~ w ~ \ 'D `-° c,c 011 ACRES ~ ~ U+ `S 0 ~ \ ~e .a ~, , . i ~~'mo \\ ~ 488.6 S0. Ff. o \ \ ao Z e \ ° ~ \ \ I \ o, \ \ , \ 1 STANSBURY, PATRIGA L \ \ ' \ ~ \ DB 3546, PG 27 \ \ ( ~ I \ GP1N~ 761713510600000 \ \ , ~ 1 \ 7800 EPIC ROAD \ \ , \ \ \ LOT 4 BOULDER CREEK \ \ I w+ o \ I \ 1 P.B. 72, PG. 92 \ 1 ~ ~ V " w ~ \ ~\ ~ w \J ~ r° 1 \ 2 ~ o~. m~ awc„ \ \ I c~~~'AxN~~ I \ ~ 2 ~ \ z \ 1 \ oa e H rz I \ \ \ \ I \ I \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ I \ ` , ` LINE BEARING DISTANCE Lt S 84'06'35' W 95.16' L2 S 84'06'35" W 52.47' L3 S 84'06'35` W 16.93' L4 S 84'06'35" W 35.00' L5 S 05'53'25" E 13.92' L6 S 83'58'31" W 35.00' L7 N 05'53'25" W 14.00' 0' S0' 100' 150' SCALE: 1 "=50' JAN. 28, 2009 COUNTY PROJECT O 1-019 ~ ®~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ Y..x~ [~x/xJtl/Rrh' ~1'i'M `f'~+Prr Grrr ~C9S I'.11. ~fUl Idlh. MLJlothun. Y~rpmia ?iI I i. PhmeaiSW 145."SIK1 • Fa::1M411?~•!?CN• F.tnad: ne+•~s/N'~clatilrAi~aweh>crrcaem ~ Inltmel: uv ta~.~hcacrli tl.h.hx'rt~errum ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT C'liettt Ih;scriptiun Ad Siie Cosl {per issuel C'h~terfirld County Right of Way LN:Jahnke Rd 11-11 1 col x 3,57 1n. Sl')U_3f; The Ubscru~cr, Inc. Publisher of 7AKB NVt7L3 Thet eo Notewber 16, 2009. d &30 pm. or u aoan thefeNler ~ rory !K l+eetd. the Bond d Sttpavteors of nC~hepxiaeareAdd dt~pnble ileeekg~llom d Cheiux&~~ Cotttttl; Wyisba,,ti eawider the atredr oP emkeeat domeitt foe the ~egttYflie~ aF eetettuan trews ptoptefla to L407 Sttfotd ltwd. Pfl~F 757719173100000, i1N Ialt:,},c ttwd Pll~ 758713M6300000. 1171 Jehnke P.wd, t'rN:75071362570000q 74pY Jshttke Road PIN: 760713531900000, 7x00 Elk >inetl PfNs 761713510600000 for f1,r aKtttr6ctloo ~~>~ ~ .ogttl~io.srs m fikhtfhe ' t]imla~eaeerfidd t3a as~..adsAO ps,. Mend.rt~lptt~ F- 17te r: held ~ ~ pabiic farlily dafined to Ye aasolk oo persons w~ d tlet. Aar paww~.gri~~ygt«tdtlo~ 00 ~~trY~eu''rm~t.~aw...d ~otdudw~~pt~ct 7~Paewear~tr i~ll~bl~pt~x~.7io~~-. fur 111s daF smt ttarTr the tatett M the e~Md tto l6tr Ih6a d6etaKtber 13.2007. CHF.STFRFIF.I.D OB.SF.RVF.R This is to certify that the atlacheti legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, stag of Virginia, on the following date(sj: 11I11lZ008 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ I ~' day of rv~ ~~~- .2~~~. Legal Affiant r /' ;. ,;~ L~-~„I~-, !~t'cs ,Grooms Jr., Not Public My colrunission expires: l~ebruary 29, 2012 Commission I.D. 7182093 (S~ALj i ~~•_ •oµ~>ti f kry~~ • s v r'.-t~-t: ~ ` ' '' ~ eTtitO~'. : ,..,... THIS 1S ~10T A B1I.l.. Pi.F.ASF PAY FROM INVOICE. THAYK YOU. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 -- AGENDA ,~, Meeting Date: November 18, 2009 Item Number: 20. Subject: Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting Supervisors County Administrator's Comments• County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: of the Board of Motion of adjournment and notice of the Board of Supervisors meeting to be held on December 2, 2009 at 3:00 p.m, in the Public Meeting Room. Preparers __ Janice Blakley Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Clerk to the Board ^ No #