Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
04-26-1989 Minutes
A~]~IL 26t 2989 ~r. G. H. Applegate, Chairman M~. C. F. Cu%rin, Jr., vice Chairman Mr. Jesse J. Mayas Mr. M. B. Sulliva~ Mr. Lane ~, Ramsay County Administrator ~r. H~rry G. Denial, due to ~taff in Att~dance: Ms. Amy Davis, E×ec. nsst, ~o Co. Admin. Mrm. Doris DeHart, Asst. CO. Admln., Legis. SYNC. and Intergovern. Affairs MS. Joan Delaval, Clerk ~o the Board Mr. Bradford S. Harm~er, Deputy Co. Admin., MS. Alice B=f~ner, Youth Svcs. Coord. Mr. William H. Howell, Dif., Gen. Services Dir. of Planning M~. Mary LeU Lyle, Dir. of Acoounting Mr. Robert Masden~ Deputy CO. A~min., Mr. R. S. ~cCraeken, Tranmp, Director Mr. RicAard McElfish, Dir. of Rnv. Eng. Mr. Steve Micas, Cu. Attorney ~rs. Paulin~ Mi:chell, Dir. of News/Info. Services Sheriff J.W. Mutispaugh~ Sheriff'~ Department Deputy Co. Admin., ~r. Jay Stegmaier, Di~. of ~udget Mr. ~. D. Stlth, Jr., Dir. of Pa~k~ & Rec. Mr. David welchon$, Dir. of Utilities ~r. Fra6erick Willis, Dir. of H~an Eesourue Manag~zent Mr. Applegate called the meeting to order ut 9:~0 a.m. 1. I~VOCATION Mr. Applegate intro~uce~ Dr. Marvin ~. Jacobs~ Pastel of Salem Baptist Church, who gave the invocation. 2. ~LEDG~ OF ALLEGIANCE TO T~ FLAG OF ~'~ ~N1T~ STAT~S OF Deputy Sheriff O. C. Grav~ lc4 th~ Ptmdga of Allegiance to the Flag of %he united Statea of America. The Board welcomed him upon hi~ return from a l~ng~hy recuperation from an automobile accident. 3. APPrOVAL OF On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved the minutes of April 12, 1989, aa aubmitted. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Mayes and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 4. CO~N%"~AD~IRIST~ATOR'$ CeremENTS There were no County Administrator comments at this time. 5. BeARD COMMITTEE I~EPO~TS Mr. Applegate announced that Mr. Daniel was out of the country pursuing economic development interests. Mr. Mayes reported he attended the Education Advisory Committee to the Council for Information Management at the Capitol. Mr. Sullivan reported he attende~ the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and Richmond Regional Planning District Commission (RRPDC) meetings, at which there were discussions relative te eppertunities for regional cooperation. Mr. Currin reported he also attended the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) meeting which he felt was very enlightening. Mr. Applegate reported he attended the Capital Region Airport Commission (CRAC) meeting at which a speaker from the Federal Aviation A~inistration (F~) suggested the local co~i~sion consider the possibility of exploring the feasibility 0f the const~cting a new regional airport in Central Virginia. 6. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE ACTION, EMERGENCY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES IN 'r~ ORDER OF PRESENTATION On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Hoard added Item ll.F.4., Set Public Hearing Date to Consider an Amendment to the County Zoning Ordinance Relative to Group Homes, Croup Care Facilities and Half-Way Houses; added to existing Item ll.B.3., Request for Dingo/Raffle Permits, a request from St. Michael's School for a raffle permit; added to existing Item ll.I., Executive Session, an item for Consultation with Legal Counsel Relative to Probable Litigation Regarding the ~roc~or's Creek Sewage Treatment Plant, pursuant to Section 2.1-344 (a) (6) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; moved Item ll.J., Meet with Model County Government Day Students out of sequence ahead of Item I., Executive Session; and adopted the agenda, as amended. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Mayes and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 7. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL RECOGNITIUE$ 7.A. DR, F. NATHANIEL GATLIN, PETERSBURG SYMPHONY On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Currin, the £ellewing resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Dr. F. Nathaniel Gatlin was born in Mississippi and attended high school in Dayton, Ohio where he perfected his skills in the use of the clarinet; end 89-490 WHEREAS, Because of the development cf those tremendous skills, Dr. ~aflin earned a scholarship to go to oberlin coRservatory of Music, where he earned his Bachelor's Degree University and his Doctorate of Music at Columbia University; WHEREAS, Dr. Gatlin was the Chairman of ~he Music Department at Virginia State University fo~ twenty-two year~ end through his music he fostered cooperation that extended WHEREAS, In those twenty-two years Dr. ~atlin became an accomplished clarin=tist and performed across the United States with some of the fop orchestras in th~ country; and WHEREAS, Ur. Gatlin developed a band at Virginia State University whiuh beuause of it~ acclaim~ toured Europe and gave three concert p~rfermances at Expo 67 at Montreal, Canada; and W~EPd~AS, Becaus~ of the band Dr. ~atlin wag invited to Washington Redskins and was invited to play i~ %he Presidents WHEREAS, In fulfilling a lifetime dre&m~ founded and developed the Petersburg Symphony which perfoImed all over the metropolitan area includinq the high scheol~ in Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Because oi the development of this orchestra, Dr. Gatlin was able to ~raw community and gover~,ent support including that of Chesterfisld County. NOW, THEREFOPJ~ BE IT ~ESOLVED, that the Chesterfield outstanding achievements of One of its finest citizens, Dr. Nathaniel Gatlin, posthumously and extends its deepest sympathy and be~t wi~hes tO h~s f~ily. Ay~ M~. Applegate, Mr. Coffin, ~r. Mayss and Mr. Sullivan. Absent= Mr. Daniel. Mr. Mayas stated he and ~r. Stith would present the executed resolution at a Petersburg Symphony performance on April 1989. 7.s. ~. A~= L. ~ASSAD, %~A~D~BS A~D SOCIETY OF V~RC~A On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Mayas, th~ following resolution was adopt~: WHEPd~AS, The Travelers Aid Society of virginia is a non-profit organization, participating in the. United Way ~rogram, providing professional counseling and e~ergency movement fro~ one ar~a of the Country to another with indsptb, ~ituation and Oeoling wi~h underlying problems; and WEaK,AS, The Travelers Aid Society of V~rginia is a parc of a national "Chain of Service" which is a network of WHEREAS, Upon assuming the position of President, Mr. Abe self-sufficient by developing alternate funding sources and by improving the quality of program services; and 89-491 WHEREAS, Through Mr. Massad'z efforts~ ~he ~ravelers Aid Society of Virginia has managed to significantly increase its s~rvic~s tO the community and at the same time reduce its dependency on United Way fund~ from 97% in 1984 to 83% in 1988; and WHEREAS, Through Mr. Massad's dedication and l~adership aa Chairman of the Agency's Airport Service Committee, a service desk at the Richmond International Airport was established in 1984; during 1987, he led ~he organization in an indepth self assessment procesz; during 1988, he led the organization in the development of a comprehensive strategic long-range plan and through his family Owned hotel, Massad House Hotel, late night emergency lodging is provided to stranded travelers through a referral program with the Chesterfield, Richmond, Henrico, Hanover and State Police; and WBEREAS, Mr. Massed has served On the Board of Directors since 1982 through the present, served as Treasurer in 1983 and 1984, served as Vice President in 1985 and 1986 and es President in 1987 and 1988. NOW, THEREFOP~E BE IT P~ESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Bupervisors does hereby zecognize the untiring contributions of Mr. Abe L. Ma~ad to the community in promoting The Travelers Aid Society of Virginia and assisting lost, distraught and unstable clients needing a friendly, reliable and helping hand. Ayes: Mr. Appl~gate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Hayes and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. ~z. Applegate presented the executed resolution to Mr. Massad and commended him for his untiring efforts and contributions to the co--unity. 7.C. SPONSORS OF THE 1989 BOULDERS FAMILY CONCERT SERIES On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin~ the Board accepted $14~508 and authorized staff to increase the revenues and expenditures in the amount of $14,500 to the Parka and Recreation Fund for use in the 1989 Boulders Family Concert Series and adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, Music is a cultural opportunity which should be available to all citizens of the County; and WHEREAS, The Boulders Family Concert Series, sponsored by the Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation Department, is an avenue to this pursuit; and WHEREAS, The financial contributions of THE BOULDERS; Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance Company; Jerry L. Campbell, Real Estate Broker; Glare Newman Anderson Architects; Property Services Corp. of Virginia; and Capricorn Systems Associates, Inc. have made attendance at this concert series free for the public; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Chssterf±eld County does hereby recognize THE BOULDERS; Fidelity Bankers Lif~ Insurance Company; Jerry L. Campbell, Real Estate Broker; Glave Newman Anderson Architects; Property Services Corp. of Virginia; and Capricorn Systems Associate~, Inc. for their generous donations toward the concert series. AND, SE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors hereby expresses its appreciation and gratitude to these members of the corporate core,unity for their interest in and contribution toward the quality of life in Chesterfield County. 89-492 Ayss~ Mr. Applegate, Mr. Curt±n, Mr. Mayss and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. Mr. Applegate presented executed resolutions to Ks. Laura Bostwick, Pid~lity Bankers Life Insurance Company; Mr. Howard Jenkins, III, The Boulders; Mr. Jose santiago, Capricorn Systems Associates, Ins.; and Mr. Sam Davis, Gtave NeWman Andermon Arohitectm for their participation/contributions to 7.D. D~SZ~AIING MAY 1~.~.~ AS "MODEL COUNTY GOVERNMENT DAY" On me,ion e~ Mr. ~ayes, seconded by Mr. C~rrin, the following resolution was W~P~S, Our democratic form of govern~e~ is predisa%ed on an informed an~ a¢~ive citizenry; and W~K~AS, Knowledge of the ~unetions and prosmss of local goverrim~mt and an understanding of %he problems and issues addressed by local e~icials a~e important elements of citizenship; and Chesterfield County High S~hool~ have been mtudying local W~AS, Through a competitive process, a spesial ~roup of ~edel County Goverr~snt Day -- a program that provide~ County government have an opportunity to provide their insight W~RR~A~, 9he Chesterfield county ~oard of Supervisors recognizes th~ importanc~ of young people having opportunities supports activities that cultivate youth leadership and build Soard of Supervisors that the eleventh day of May, 1989 is b~reby proclaimed "Model County Goverp_~nt Day" in Ches%erfisld County and that this observance is called to the &tt~ution of ~. he~ Chase, Program Specialist for So~ial Studies, briefly s~pleined the purpose of the program. Mr. Applegate requested kh~ students introduce themselves, encouraged them to enjoy their learnin~ expe~ience and presented %he executed to ~$. Chase and Zs. Neffner. 7.~. PROCLAIMIM~ A~RI~ 30 - MAX 7~ 1989. ~S '~2LMERICAN HOME WEEK" On motion of ~r. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the followin~ r~olu~ion was adopted: 89-493 WI~EP~EAS, Because Americans enjoy more political and economic freedom than any Other people on earth, this great nation is known the world over as the land of liberty; and WHEREAS, Of all the rights we have, one of the most precious is the right of each citizen to own, use, or transfer real property a~ he or she sees fit, so long as the rights of others are not infringed upon; and W/~EREAS, We must guard against taking for granted the rights that come with home ownership. Owning one's home and preserving these rights foster democracy because it disperses individual decision making that collectively affects the well-being of our conu~unity; such ownership requires that people save not only for their own homes, but it encourages savings in other sectors of the economy, creating growth and contributing to a higher quality ef life; and WHEREAS, Because the Richmond Hoard of REALTORS and the National Association of REALTORS, are setting aside a week to celebrate our constitutional freedom to own real property, asking all citizens in our community to join in reaffirming this basic freedom. NOW, THERE?ORE BE IT P~ESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Hoard of Supervisors, does hereby proclaim April 30 - May 7, 1989 to be "American Home Week" and ask all residents of Chesterfield County to join with the Richmond Board of REALTORS and its members in setting aside this period to remind ourselves that we are a free people endowed with the right to own real property, and given the responsibility to protect that right. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Mayes and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. Mr. Applegate presented the executed resolution to Mr. Dewey Reynolds and Ms. Cindy Saufley of the Richmond Hoard of Realtors, who were present. 7.F. MR. GENE R. ANDERSON, PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the iollowing resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Chesterfield County is committed to maintaining a positive employes relations environment which includes a fair and timely resolution of employee grievances; and WHEREAS, The County has adopted a formal grievance procedure in compliance with State law and provides for an impartial panel to hear grievances at the final step in the process through citizen appointments to the Personnel Appeals Board; and WHEREAS, Mr. Gene R. Anderson has rendered dedlcat~d and effective public service as a member of the Personnel Appeals soard for almost nine years having served one unexpired term and two full three year terms; and WHEREAS, Mr. Anderson served as Chairman of the Board during his last term of office and provided conscientious leadership in the resolution of grievances at the panel step. NOW, THEREFORR BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Mr. Gene R. Anderson and expresses their appreciation for his exemplary public service. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to Mr. Anderson and that this 89-494 resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of C~e~terfield County, Virginia. Ay~ Mr. Appl~ga~e, Mr. Currin, Mr. Mayee and Mr. Sullivan, Absent: Mr. Daniel. Mr~ Applegate presented the ~xecnt~d to Mr. Anderson and commended Sim for his dedicated service to the County. There were no hearinq$ of citizens on unscheduled matters or claims. o APPOINTM~NT~ - CAMP BAKER YJ%NAGEMkNT EQA~D On motion of Mr. Sullivan, ~oondoO by ~r. Mayas, the Board appoin=ed Mr. Alfred P. Elko to serve on the Camp ~aker Management Board representing Chesterfield County, whose term is e~ctlve immediately and will expir% on April 3~, 1990. Ayes; Mr. Appleg&%e~ Mr. Currin, Mr. Mayas and Mr. Sullivan. Absen%~ ~r. Daniel. o TO CONSIDER THE CONVEYANCE OF A DARCEL OF Lk~D IN THE AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL PARK TO MARUCHA/~ VIRGINIA~ INC, AND AUTHORIZE REAL ESTATE CONTRACT Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised fur a public hearing to co~sider the conveyance of a parcel of land in the A~rp~ft Industrial Park ko Maruchan Virginia, !nc. No on~ came forward to speak in favor of or agains= thc matter. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Coffin, the Board approved and authorized th~ County Administrator tc cxscute any necessary documents for the conveyance of a 23.487 + acre parcel of land in the Chesterfield Airport Industrial~Park, located along Whitepine Road an~ behind the Reynoldm Me=ala Company, C~n Division, at a co~t of a~roximately $~§,000 per acre, to Maruchan Virginia, Ina., a wholly owned aubmid~ary of Toyo Suisan Kalsha, Ltd. Ayes: Mr, Applegate~ Mr. Coffin, Mr. ~&yss and Mr. Sullivan. ~r. Ramsay noted %here will be a groundbreaking ceremony at 2:00 p.m. On May 4, 1989, and it i~ anticipated Govarnor Baliles wall b~ in a~tendance. Il.A. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR AIRPORT ENGIN~ERI~¢ ~VIC=S On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr, ~ullivan, the Euar~ approved and authorized the County Administrator tu execute a with Del~a Associates~ P.E., Inet, to perform engineering m~rvicem in accordance with the Airpe/t Master ~an, contingent upon allocation o~ Cederal funds which will be negotiated annually. Ayes: Mr. Applegat~, Mr. Currln, Mr. Mayas an~ Mr. sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. S9-495 ll.B. AUTHORIZATION AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR COUNTY-WIDE INMATE LITTER PICKUP PROGRAM Mr. Ha~mer presented a brief summary of the County-wide Ir~aate Litter Pickup Program, cost factors and explained the benefitz of the program to the community, the type inmates who would be participating in.the program, security aspects, etc. Discussion, questions and comments ensued relative to the administration, responsibility and control of the proposed program, the type inmates permitted to participate, potential repercussions and/or impact on the community, absorption of costa in FY90 year-end budget adjustmenta versus utilizing General Fund monies to fund the program, authorization for hiring a Deputy to oversee inmate labor activities, etc. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved a County-wide In, ate Litter Pickup Program, ~ffective July 1, 1989, that would utilize inmate labor to perform litter pickup throughout the County and work as a direct adjunct to the Keep Chesterfield Clean Corporation program; and appropriated $53,000 to the Sheriff's Department to implement said program (includes $26,800 for personnel serviceS, $5,300 for operating expenses and $20,900 £or capital equipment). It is noted County staff will attempt to absorb the coste in the FY1989-90 Sheriff's Budget or through a year-end budget adjustment. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Mayes and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. ll.C. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A DEBRIS MANIFEST SYSTEM Mr. Hammer presented a brief overview of the revised Debris Manifest System propoaal as compared %o the first proposal presented to the Board. Discussion, questions and comments ensued relative to the length of time the debris manifest system had been under consideration and the need to take action to control illegal dumping in the County; a suggestion that consideration for setting the public h~aring date be deferred to permit members of the home builders/development industry an opportunity to review staff's revised proposal; etc. Mr. Applegate stated he felt action should be taken regarding the proposed Debris Manifest System and he was comfortable with setting May 24, 1989 aa the public hearing date to consider the matter. Mr. Sullivan expressed concern that setting the public hearing date to consider the proposal would not permit membere of the homebuilders/development industry an opportunity to review the reviaed proposal, would jeopardize the County's good faith with them, and would prefer to defer s%tting the public hearing date within 30 to 60 days. Mr. Currin stated hs concurred with setting May 24, 1989 as the scheduled public hearing date to consider the matter as hs £elt there would be sufficient time during the interim to address/resolve the homebuilde~s association's concerns. Mr. Mayes stated the homebuilders/devslepers would have an opportunity to present their concerns during the public hearing process as well. On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Apptegate, the Board set the date of May 24, 1989, at 9:00 a.m., for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to establish a Debris Manifest System. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin and Mr. Mayes. Nays: Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 89-496 ll.D. APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION CHANGE ORDERS FOR COURTS BUILD- ING PROJECT On motion of Sr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Curtis, the Board approved Change Orders 50, 53 and 68 for the Courts Building Project to cover the following and which are to be funded from the contingency of the Courts Ruilding Project Account; Conference and Training Room for the Sheriff $44,990 Eevision~ to Circuit Court Offices (PR-53) 22,773 Revisions to Irrigation System IPR-6S) 43,29~6 TOTAL~ $111,859 ll.E. CONSENT ITEMS ll.E.1, APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE 0E A FUND RES~R%'ATION PROM THE VIRGINIA D=PAATMENT OF MOUSING AND EOF~UNITY DEVELOP- MENT TO ADMINIMTEE TEEIR SINGL~ FAMILY RE~AETLITATION LOAN PROGRAM On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board accepted a $250,0~Q fund reservation from khe Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development (VDNCD) to Chesterfield County Housing Department to supplement Cea~unity Development SleEk Grant funds which support the Bellwood Housing Rehabilitation Program which will Ser~ ~pproximately twenty (20) additional households and aEthorized the County AdmlnlS~rator to execute an Administrative Agreement with VDRCD to implement the Single Family Rehabilitation Lean ~rogram. {It i~ net~d all loan f~n~ money shall be used fur :he cos~ of housing improvements and the County's role will be to solicit applications, determine eligibility and approve the rehabilitation work performed.) Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Curtis, Mr. Mayas and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 11.E.2. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE This day the Co~nty Environmental Engineer~ in accordance with dir~etio~ from this ~osrd, made report in writing ~pon his exa/nination of East Boundary Court in Brandermill Trade Center; Clover Hill Dietrich. UDon consideration whereof, and on motion o~ Mr. S~llivan~ seconded by Mr. Mayas, it ie resolved that East Boundary Court in Brandermill Trade Cen~er, Clover Hill District, be an~ it hereby i~ est&bli~hed as a public road~ And be it f~ther resolv=d, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the SeCondary System, Bast Boundary Co~z~, beginning at the inter- section with East Bounda:y Rosd, State Route 297S,. and going southeasterly 0.I6 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance easements. And be it further reso!v~d, that the Beard of SuDervisors guarantees to the Virginia 'Department of Transportation a 60' right-of-way for this read. Erandermill Tress Center is recorded as follows= 89-497 Dedication of East Boundary Court. Plat Book 35, Page 35, January 3, 1980. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Mayes and Mr. sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Crossing Way and Crossinq Way Circle in Cross Creek, Section B, Midlothian District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, it is resolved that Crossing Way and Crossinq Way Circle in Cros~ Creek, Section B, Midlothian District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Crossing Way, beginning at existing Crossing Way, Cross Creek Section A, State Route number to be assigned, and going northeasterly 0.08 mile to the intersection with Crossing Way Circle, then continuing northeasterly 0,02 mile to end at proposed Crossing Way~ Cross Creek Section C; and Crossing Way Circle, beginning at the intersection with Crossing Way, and going northerly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive' of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage The~e roads ~erve 12 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for Crossing Way and a 40' right-of-way for Crossing Way Circle. This section of Cross Creek is recorded as follows: Section B. Plat Book 56, Page 46, February 13, 1987. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Mayes and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Swanhurst Drive, Olde Stone Road and Edgeview Lane in Roxshire, Section 9, Midlothian District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, it is resolved that Swanhurst Drive, Olde Stone Road and Rdgeview 5an~ in Roxshire, Section 9, Midlothian District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Swanhurst Drive, beqinnlng at the inter- section with Framer Drive, Roxshire Section 8, State Route number to be a~signed, and going northerly 0.17 mile to end at Swanhurst Drive, Charter Woods Section 3, State Route nu~aber to be assigned; 01de Stone Read, beginning at the intersection with Framar Drive, Roxshire Section 8, State Route number to be assigned, and going southerly 0.1g mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Edgeview Lane, beginning at the intereection with Framer Drive, Roxshire S~ction 8, State Route number to be assigned, and going southerly 0.25 mile, then turning and going easterly 0.06 mile to end at proposed ~dgeview Lane, Roxshire Section 89-498 This request is inclusive of the adjacent ~l~pe, sight distance and designated virginia Department of Transportation drainage easements. These road~ serv~ 49 And be it further resolved, that fh~ Boar~ of supervisors guarantees to the Virqinia DeparSment of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of these roads. This section of Roxshire is recorded as follows: Se=riGa 9. Plat Dock 55, Pages 76 & 77, January 30, 1986. Aye~ Mr. Appleg~te, Mr. Currin, Mr. ~ayes and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. ll.E.3. R~QU~$T FOR BINGO/RAFFLE PE~IT$ ~r. ~icas disclosed to th~ Board that his children attend St. Michael's $¢hool~ however, he did not participate in ~he review of the School's request for a raffle pel~mit. On motion of Mr. Su11ivsn, seconded by Mr. May~a, %he Board approved request~ for raffle permits for the following organizations, as indicated, for the calendar year 1989: ORGANIZATION Salem Church Elementary PTA Selmcnt Hills Recreation Center, St. Michael's School TYPE Raffle Raffle Raffle Ayes: Mn. Applegate, Mr. Coffin, Mr. Mayas and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: ~r. Daniel. ll.F. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS ll.F.I. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARIN~ TO CONSIDER RESTRICTION T~RQUG~ T~UCK TRAFFIC ON WInTeR, FIELD ROAD AND SALISBURY ROAD On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr, Currin£ the Board set the date of Nay 24, 1989, at 9:00 a.m.~ for a public hearing to consider ~he restriction of through truck traffic on Winterfield Road and Salisbury Road. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currln, Mr. Mayas and Mr. sullivan. Absent: ~r. Pallet. ll.F.2. SET DAT~ FOR PUBLIC ~EARING FOR RESIDENTIAL REZONING There was discussion relative to action ~aken by the General Assembly to net allow retroactive application of Conditional Zoning (cash proffers} %~ re~oning applications received prior to July 1, 1989~ the action's impact voiding the intent of ~oard'~ Mar~h 22, 1989 resolution not to approve any resi- dent{at rezonings un~il the Board had taken all action to adopt and implement a proffer ~ystem pursuant to the new legislation adopted by the G~neral Assembly a~ w~ll as its impact upon consideration of the proposed wastewatar dispo~at plan; the appropriateness of proceeding with c©n$i~eratlon of Case 89SN0212 on May 14, 1989; ~he catting cf a precedent if the Board were to consider re~enings on a ease-by-case basis; revocation of exi~tlng policy as established at the March 22, 89-499 1989 meeting; returning to the procedure for consideration Of all residential rezonings; the necessity to suspend the rules and add an item to the agenda to rescind the March 22, 1989 resolution concerning approval of residential rezoning; the status of staff's recommendation for the proposed wastewater disposal plan; etc. Mr. Mayas made a motion to set the date of May 24, 1989, at 9:00 a.m., for a public hearing to consider Case 89SN0212, provided the proffer for a minimUm lot size of 0.75 acre parcelm was deleted from the request. Mr. Sullivan seconded the motion to permit discussion. There was further discussion relative to the fact that repealing the March 22, 1989 resolution concerning approval of residential rezoning would negate the need to set a public hearing date to hear Case 89SN0212; suspension of the rules to rescind the previously adopted resolution; etc. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board suspended its rules to rescinded a resolution previously approved at the March 22, 1989, Board of Supervisors meeting, Item K., Resolution Concerning Approval of Residential Rezon- lng. Ayes: M~. Applegate, Mr. Coffin, Mr. Mayas and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. Mr. Micas stated it would not be necessary to add an item to the agenda to rescind the previously approved re~olution as the Board's action would resolve Item ll.F.2., Set Public Hearing for Residential Rezoning Request. On motion of Mr. ~ullivan, seconded by Mr. Currln, the Board rescinded the following resolution, Item K., Resolution Concerning Approval of Residential Rezoning, as approved at the March 22, 1989, Board of Supervisors meeting: "Mr. Sullivan amended his motion, seconded by Mr. Daniel, as follows: W~EI~EAS, Chesterfield County has been experiencing high rates of residential growth for over a decade; and WHEREAS, residential growth places extraordinary demands on the delivery of necessary public services; and WHeReAS, state law currently imposes severe restrictions on the ability of the County to insure that the cost of residential 'development is fairly borne by the development oo~tmunity rather than by County funds; and WHEREAS, the County can no longer approve new residential development, under the present legal restrictions, without adversely affecting the overall financial stability, welfare and safety of County citizens; and W~EREAS~ in recognition of these legal restrictions, the General Assembly has enacted legislation, effective July 1, 1989, which will permit the County to accept monetary proffers from developers seeking rezoning and to create transportation districts to fund neeSesary read improvements; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has considered, and has forwarded to thc Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation, a proposed plan eddressinq the disposal of wastewater in residential developments; and WHEREAS, in order to fulfill its obligation to promote orderly land use planning and to protect the financial stability, welfare and safety of County citizens, the Board must adopt all necessary ordinances and policies pursuant to 89-500 ~as~ewater disposal in residential zones before th~ Board can reasonably consider an~ a~prov~ new residential development. Supervisors of Chesterfield County that, fr, om this date, the Doard will neb approve any rsqn~sts for residsntial rezoninq nntil the Board has taken ~11 necessary action to adopt and implement a proffer system ~ursuant to the new leqislatien adopted by the General Assembly and has comDIeted i~8 consideration of the proposed wastewat~r disposal plan. Thi~ re~elution shall apply to all ~esidential rezoning requests except those for which a recommendation has already been made by th~ Planning Commis~ioD. This resolution shall expire of i~s own force if the Beard takes no action to adopt a proffe~ ordinance by September 1, 19S9_ Ayes: Mr. Applegat~, Mr. Carrie, Mr. Daniel and Nr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Mayes." Ayes: Mr. 'Applegate, Mr. Cnrrin, Mr, Mayes and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. ~l.F.3. STREETLIGE? REQUESTS On motion of Mr. Coffin, seconded by Mr. Appleg~t~, the Board approved obtaining cost estimates for the installation of street liqh%s at the followin~ locations! 1. Intersection of Hilltop Farms Drive and 01d Cen~ralia ~. Intersection of Jean Drive and Re,met Road, Bermuda District~ 3. End of Jean Drive, B~rmnda Dis~rict; 4. 4311 Old Hnndred Road 5outh~ Clever ~ill District~ 5. 4401 Old Hundred Road South, Clover ~ill District; 6. Nuttree Subdivision, Old ~undred Road South, r~ar o~ Lot 58, Clover Hill Dist~iot; 7. Intersection of Old Eundred Road South and Tall Hickory Drive, Clover ~ill District; I~tersection of Tall Eickory Court and Tall ~ickory Drive~ Clover Hill District; 9. Intersection of Pecan Terrace and Tall Hickory Drive, Clover Hill bi~trlot; 10. Intexs~ctlon of Acorn E£11 Cour~ and Tail Rickety Clover Hill District; ll. IntersectiOn of Red Chestnut Court and Red Chestnut Driv~ · Clover ~iI1 District; 12. 12907 Bed chestnut Drive (Lot 1F. End of Red Chestnut Drive; and 14, Peea~ Terrace cul-de-sac. Ayes: Mr. AppIegate, Mr. C~rrin, Mr, Mayes and ~r. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 89-501 ll.F.4. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO AMEND THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE RELATIVE TO GROUP HOMES, GROUP CARE FACILITIES AND HALFWAY HOMES On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board set the date of May 24, 1989, at 9:00 a.m., for a public hearing to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance relative to group homes, group care facilities and halfway homes. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Coffin, Mr. Mayas and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. ll.G. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ITEMS ll.G.1. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE A 16 FOOT PERMANENT SANITARY SEWER AND A 10 FOOT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IN HOLLY TRACE SUBDIVISION, SEC- TION 2 Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to vacate a 16' permanent sanitary sewer easement and 10' temporary construction easements across Lots 4 and 5, Holly Trace Subdivision, Section 2. NO one came forward to speck in favor of or against the proposed ordinance. On motion o£ Mr. Coffin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board adopted the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE to vacate a 16 foot permanent sewer easement and 10 foot construction ease- ments across Lots 4 and 5, Holly Trace Sub- division, Section A, Dale District, Chester- field County, Virginia, as shown on a plat thereof duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in Plat Book 62, Page 56. WHEREAS, Perry G. Miles and Crestwood Builders, Ino., A Virginia Corporation have petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia to vacate a 16 foot permanent sewer easement and 10 foot construction easements across Lots 4 and 5, Holly Trace Subdivision, Section A, Dale District, Chesterfield County, Virginia more particularly shown on a plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of said County in Plat ~ook 62, Page 56, made by Balzer & Associates, Inc., dated ~une 20, 1988. The easements petitioned to be vacated are more fully described as follows: A 16 foot permanent sewer easement and 10 foot construction easements across Lots 4 and 5, Holly Trace Subdivision, Section A, the location of which is more fully shown on a plat made by Balzer & Associates, Inc., dated June 20, 1988, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance. WHZREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertising; and WHEREAS, ne.public necessity exists for the continuance of the easements sought to be vacated. NOW THRP~FORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 89-502 That purseant to Section 15.1~4S2(b} of %he Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid ~a~e~ts be and are hereby vacated. The ~ounty hereby ~eserves all of its right, title, and inter~st in the 16 foot ~rainag~ ~a~em~D% that runs parallel to the rear lot line of Lots 4 and 5 and crosses the 16 foot permanent sewer easement and lO ~oot temporary construction easements hereby vacated. Thi~ Ordinance ~hall be in full fore~ and effect in accordance with Section 15.1-452(b} of the cede of Virginia, 1950; as amended, and a certified copy of thi~ Ordinance, together with ~he pla% ~t%aoh~d hereto shall be recorded no sooner than thirty day~ hereafter in the Clerk'~ Offi~ of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield, Virginia pursuant to 15.1-485 of the Code of Vir~i~, 1950, as The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15,1-4~3 is to destroy the force and effect Of the recording cf Dortion of the plat vacated. This Ordinance shall v~st simple title cf the easements here~y vacated in the property clear of any rights cf public u~e except as h~r~in above mentioned. Accordingly, this 0rdlnan¢~ ~hall b~ ands×ed in the names of the County of Chester£ield as grantc~ and Perry G. Mile~ and Crestwood Build~r~, Inc., ~ virginia Corporation, or their suacessors in title, as ~rantee. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr~ Mayas and ~r. sullivan. Absent: Mr~ Daniel. ll.G.2. RIGhT-OF-WAX ITEMS ll.G.2.a. AUTHORIZATION TO ACQUIRE EASEMENTS FOR UPPER SWIFT CP~E~ TR;%NS~O~T SyST~ EY ~MIEENT DOI4AIN ll~O.2,a,1, MR, CU~TI~..~_L_C©LEMAN~ ET AL, On motion of Mr. Applegate~ seconde~ by ~r. Coffin, th~ Board authorized the Connty Attorney to proceed with the use of eminent domain agains~ the following property owners if the amoun~ as s~t opposit~ %heir names is not further mesolved kbat thc County Administrator notify ~aid property owner by registered mail on April ~7, ~959, of the County's intention to enter upon and take the property which is to b~ th~ sub,eot of ~ald use of eminent dom~&n. This action is On an o~ergency basis and the County intends to exercis~ i~t~edia~e right of entry, pursuant to ~eotlon 1~.1-235.1 of the Code of Virqinia. Mr. Cue=is L. Coleman, et al Tax Map 46(1)57 $18,775. Ayes: Mr. Applegata, rT. Cnrrin, Mr. Mayas and Mr_ Sullivan. Absent: Mr. ll.G.2.a.2. MR. RONALD L. HANEY On motion o~ Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board authorized the County Attorney to proceed with the use of eminent domain a~ainet the following property owner if the amount as set opposite his name is not accepted. And be it further resolved that th~ County Administrator notify property owner by registered mail. on April 27, 1989, of the CoUnty's intention to ent%r upon and take the property which is to be the subject of Said use of eminent domain. ~his action is on an emerqency basis and the County intends to exercise 89-503 immediate right of entry, pursuant to Section 15.1-238.1 of the Code of Virginia. Mr. Ronald L. Haney Tax Maps 46-10 (1) 6 $2,020. and 46-10 (3) 6 Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Mayes and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. ll.G.2.a.3. CENTRAL FIDELITY BANK, TRUSTEE On motion of Mr. Apptegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Hoard authorized the County Attorney to proceed with the use of eminent domain against the following property owners if the amount as set opposite their name is not accepted. And be it further resolved that the County Administrator notify said property owner by registered mail on April 27, 1989, of the County's intention to enter upon and take the property which is to be the subject of said use of eminent domain. This action is on an emergency basis and the County intends to exercise immediate right of entry, pursuant to Section 15.1-238.1 cf the Code of Virginia. Central Fidelity Bank, Tax Map 46 (1) 73 $2,425. Trustee for Farmville Orthopedic Clinic, P.C. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Mayes and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. ll.G.2.a.4. MR. AND MRS. J. J. JEWETT Mr. Applegate disclosed to the Board that Mr. J. J. Jewett i~ an employee of Appleqate Realty, declared a conflict of interest pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive Conflist of Interest Act and excused himself from the meeting. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, ~eoonded by Mr. Currin, the Board authorised the County Attorney to proceed with the use of eminent domain against the following property owners if the amount as set opposite their name is not accepted. And be it further resolved that the County Administrator notify said property owner by registered mail on April 27, 1989, of the County's intention to enter upon and take the property which is to be the subject of said use of eminent domain. This action is on an emergency basis and the County intends to exercise immediate right of entry, pursuant to Section 15.1-238.1 of the Code of Virginia. Mr. J.J. Jewett and Tax Maps 46-10 (1) 12 $8,314. Mrs. Patsy ~. Jewett and 46-10 (3) 5 Ayes: Mr. Currin, Mr. Mayes and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Applegate and Mr. Daniel. Mr. Applegate returned to the meeting. ll.G.2.b. AGREEMENT WITH VIRGINIA D~pARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR DESIGN WORK FOR HIGHWAY WIDENING PROJECT ALONG ROUTE 10 (FROM ROUTE 150 TO BEACH ROAD) On motiOn of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board approved and authorize the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents to enter into two agr~em~nt~ for utilities ~de$ign work on the Virginia Department of Transportation projects, one along Route 10 from Route 150 to Cesby's Lake, Project Nunfoer 89-0558 ($5,679.00 5H5217-400R for Project Nuraber 89-0558 and $631.00 5P5217-700R for Project Number 89-0558); and one along Route 10 from Cosby's Lake to Beach 89-504 Road, Project ~umber 89-0559 ($1,364.G~ for Project ~9-0559), which total costs for both ~n~in~e~ing service contracts will not exceed $6,310.00 for Project 89-0558 or $1,364+00 ~H-5217-400R for Project ~nn~er 89-0559. Ay~s~ Mr. Appl~gate, Mr. Currin, ~r. Mayo@ and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. ll.G.3. CO, SENT ITEMS ll.G.3.a. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR BESLW00D MANOR ~OTfL, OFF- On motion of Mr. Currin, zeconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved the following ~ewer ~ont~aot and authorized the County Administrato~ ~o exe~nte any necessary d0¢%%men~s: 89-0038 - ~ollwood ~ano~ Motel: Developers: Glenn and Lauretta L. Richardson Ren&ld J. Riel and Samuel S. Shearin, Jr. Pravinchandra sad Kokila Amin Contractor: Lyttle Utilities Total Contract Total Estimated County {R~fund through coDne¢~ion fees) Estimated Developer Co~t~ Code~ $32,3~9~12 F~ture 5N-2511-997 Aye~ Mr. Apple~ate, ~r. Currin, ~r. Mayes an~ Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. ll.G.5.b. ABP~OVAL OF CONTRACT FOR RIVER RIDGE~ OFF-SITE WATER LINE On motion of Mr. Currin~ seconded by Mr. Mayes, t~e Boar~ &pp~oved the following water ~ontract and authorized the COunty Administrator to execute any necessary doo%lm~nts: 89-G~59 - River Ridge Off-Site Water Line: Developer: Charles E. and Jacq~eline C~ Vette Contractor: Lewis H. Easter and Company Total Contract Cost: Total Estimated County COSt: {Refund through connection fees) Estimated Developer Number of Connections: $23,264.00 $16,969.25 $ 6,294.7~ F~ture Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Mayes and Mr, Sullivan. Absent: Mn, Danio1. ll.G.3.c. ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ALONG OLD TOWN CREEK On motion of Mr. Cnrrin~ Seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board aecapta~ on behalf of the county, the conveyance of a 16 foot permanent easement crossing a parcel of land along Old Te~n Creek, locatsd in the Matoaca District, from Mr. Robert Thompson and ~s. Virginia S. Thompson and authorized the County Administrator to sign the necessary deed of dedication. {It is noted a copy of the plat i~ filed with the papers of thio Beard.) Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Ma~e~ and Mr. Sullivan. Abment: Mr. Daniel. 89-505 11.O14. REPORTS Mr. Sale presented the Board with a report on the developer water and sewer contraets'exeouted by the County Administrator. ll.H. REPORTS Mr. Ramsay pra~ented the Board with a status report on the General Fund Contingency Acconnt, General Fund Balance, Road Reserve Funds, District Road and Street Light Funds, Lease Purchases, School Board Agenda, Board Public Hearing Schedule, and a Status Report on the ~mergency Medical Services Task Force. Mr. Ramsay stated the Virginia Department of Transportation has formally notified the County of the acceptance of the following roads into the State Secondary System: ADDI?IO~ LE~GT~ OLD COACH HILL ~ SECTION C Route 2326 (Hackney Road) - From 0.07 mile north Route 2301 to north cul-de-sac 0.10 Mi. Route 3180 (Hackney Circle) - From Route 2326 to southwest cul-de-sac 0.11 Mi. MASON WOODS - SECTION A Route 4030 (Mason Woods Drivel to 0.02 mile north Route 4034 - From Route 641 Route 4031 (Mason Woods Court) - From Route 4030 to east cul-de-sac Route 4032 (Mason Way Court) - From Route 4030 to east cul-de-sac ROute 4033 (Mason Hollow Drive) - From Route 4030 to west cul-de-sac Route 4034 (Mason Rest Court) - From Route 4030 to east cul-de-sac 0.t7 Mi. 0.05 Mi. 0.05 Mi. 0.08 Mi. 0.07 Mi. ROXSHIRE - SECTION 8 Route 4170 (Framar Drive) - From Route 728 to 0.15 mile west Route 4172 Route 4171 (Old Queen Terrace) - From Route 4170 to north cul-de-sac Route 4172 (Old Stone Road) - From Route 4170 to north cul-de-sac Route 4173 (Old Stone Circle) ~ From Route 4172 to west cul-de-sac 0.40 Mi. 0.11 Mi. 0.14 Mi. 0.06 Mi. STONEBRIDGE, SECTION 1; IRONGATE, SECTION 2 Route 3950 (Bridgeside Drive) - From Route 3025 to RoUte 3951 Route 3951' (Koufax Drive) - ~rom Route 3950 to 0.03 mile west Route 3952 Route 3952 (O'Malley Drive) - From Route 3951 to 0.05 mile south Route 3950 Route 3953 (Labine Court) - From Route 3952 to northeast cul-de-sac 0.26 Mi. 0.23 Mi. 0.20 Mi. 0.04 Mi. 89-506 GLEBE POINT - ~RCTIONS 4 & 5 Rout~ 3940 {Creek Stone Drive) - Prom Rout% 3015 to north cul-de-sac 0.25 Mi. Route 394l {Creak Stone Court) - From Route 3940 to west cul-de-sac 0.15 Mi. Route 3942 {Flagstone Court) - From Route 3015 tc northeast cul-de-sac 0.09 Mi. 3015 to northeast cul-de-sac 0.17 Mi. ll.J. MELT MODEL COUNTY GOVERNMENT DAY STUDENTS The BOard m~t i~dividually with students partlcipating in Modal County Government Day activities to discuss/describe the duties ~equi~ed of th~ local goverr~aent positions those students would ll.I. EXECUTIVE On motion o~ Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Maye$, the ~oard went ia~0 Executive S¢ssion ~o discuss the acquisition or ~me of real property for public purpo~e~ and to con,alt with legal counsel concerning probable litigation regarding the Proctor's Creek Sewage Treatment Plane, pursuant to Sections 2.I-344 (al {2) and {6), respectively, of the Code of vi~qinia, 1950, as amended. Mr. Applegate, Mr. Coffin, Mr. ~aye~ and ~r. sullivan. Mr. Daniel. ll.K. LUNCH The Board recessed at 12~10 p.m. to travel to the Sunset Cafe for lunch. ll,L. MOBILE HOMES REQUESTS 89SR0200 In Mateaea Magisterial District, SHOOSMITH ~ROS., INC. re- que~te~ renewal of ~obile Home Permit 845R053 ~o park a mobile home On property fronting the wt~ line of Lewis Road and northwest lime of Lake Dale Road, approximately 1,SO0 feet south of Iron Bridge Road, and bett~r known ~$ ~1500 Lewis ~oad. Tax Map 113 (1) Parcel 21 (Sheet 31). The first permit ~r. ~acobson stated ~taff recommended approval of Ca~e 89SR0200, ~ubject to amended conditiuns 1 and 2 and standard condition~ 3 through 7 because the structure i~ ~tilized for security purpose~. Mr. Thomas Cobhs, representing thc applicant~ stated th~ recommended ccndieioms were acceptable. There was no opposition present. 89-507' On motion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board approved Case 89SR0200 for sev~n (7) years, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall be the owner of the mobile home. 2. No lot or parcel may be rented or leased for use as a mobile home site, nor shall any mobile home be used for rental property. Only two (2) mobile home~ shall bs permitted to be parked on this parcel. 3. The minimum lot size, yard ~etbacks, nequired front yard, and other zoning requirements of the applicable zoning district shall bo complied with, except that no mobile home shall be located closer than 20 feet to any existing residence. 4. No additional permanent-type living space may be added onto a mobile home. Ail mobile homes shall be skirted but shall not be placed on a permanent foundation. 5. Where public (County) water and/or sewer are available, they shall be used. 6. Upon being granted a Mobile Home Permit7 the applicant shall then obtain the necessary permits from the Office of the Building Official. This shall be done prior to the installation or relocation of the mobile home. 7. Any violation of the above cendition~ shall be grounds for revocation of the Mobile Home Permit, Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Mayas and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 89SR0201 In Matoaca Magisterial District, SBOOSMIT~ BROS., INC. re- quested renewal of Mobile Home Permit $45R054 to park a mobile home on property fronting the west line of Lewis Road, approxi- mately 200 feet south of Iron Bridge Road, and better known as 11700 Lewis Road. Tax Map 114-9 (11 Parcel 1 (Sheet 31). The first permit was issued on April 2, 1975. Mr. Jacobsen stated staff recommended approval of Case 89SR0201, subject to amended Condition 1 and standard conditions 2 through 7 because the structure is utilized as an office. Mr, Thomas Cobbs, representing the recommended conditions are acceptable. present. On motion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by approved Cass $9SR0201 £or seven (7) following conditions: applicant, stated the There was no opposition Mr. Currin, the Board years, subject to the 1. The applicant shall be the owner of the mobile home. 2. Nc lot or parcel may be rented or leased for use as a mobile home ~ite, nor shall any mobile home be used for rental property. Only one (1) mobile home shall be permitted to be parked on an individual lot or parcel. 3. The minimum lot size, yard setbacks, required front yard, and other zoning requirements of the applicable zoning district shall be complied with, except that no mobile home shall be located closer than 20 feet to any existing residence. 89-508 4. PO a~d£tional permanent-type living space may be added onto a mobile home. All mobile homes shall be ~kirt~d but shall not be placed on a permanent fonndation. 5. Where public ~Co~nty) water and/os sewer are available, they shall be umed. 6~ Upon bein~ ~rante~ a ~bile Home Permit, the applioant shall then obtain the necessary permitm from the Office of the Building Official. This shall be done prior to the installation or relocation of the mobile home. 7. Any Violation of the above conditions shall be grounds for revos~ien oi ~he Mobile Nome P~rmi~. Aye~ Mr, Appl~gat~, M~. Currin, ~r. Mayas and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. In Bermuda Magisterial District, WEMLEx G. ~GORX requested r~newat of Mobil~ Bome P~rmit 84SK-36 to park a mobile homm on proDszty fronting the north line of w~lli~ Road, at Pams Avenue~ and b~tter known am 2402 Willis Road. Tax Map ~2-5 Kingsland Heiqht~, re% 9 (~heat 2~. The first permit was issued in 1970. 89SR0218, subject to certain standard condition~. Mr. Wesley Gregory stated the recommended oenditions were voiced opposition to th~ proposed request. Mr. Dean Kawkins, representing Mr. Battle, submitted photographs amd presented slides depio=ing ~he e~bject ~ite; described the ~ite as not being in compliance with the zoning requirements; s~a%ed the Area Land Use and Transportation Plan fox genexal co--e/sial ~eneral Businmss (B-3) khez~by giving ~he area a transitional character; and s~aCed him eli~n~ h~$ a rezoning request for co~e~cial d~v~lopment which may be affected by approval ~f ~his came and amked %hat Case 89SR0218 b~ d~nied~ Mr. Edwi~ Campbull and Mr. Jame~ L. Ogburn also voiced genera/ opposition to the proposed When asked, Mr. Jacobsen ~tat~d further research relative Mr. Hawkinz allege=ions would b~ necessary and indicated that if a permanent addition had b~en made to the mobile home prior to a permit being ismhed, the addition would have grandfatkere~, Mr. Currin stated he f~lt ~he reques=md ume wam not related request, he wished %o d~fer the case for thirty (30) ~ays order to meet wi~ Mr. Gregory and adjacent property owners to deferred considera:ion of Case 89SR0218 until May 2~, 1989. subject site to investigate kbs vio~atibns as indioa%e~ by Aye$~ Mr. Apple~a~e, Mr. CuTrin, Mr. Mayem and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. ~9-509 Mr. Applegate requested that Case 89SN0144 be taken out of sequence so that Delegate John G. Dicks, III, representing the request, could return to the General Assembly to attend a special session as called by the Governor. ll.M. REQUESTS PeR R~EONING 89SN0144 In Matoaca Magisterial District, SIGNET BANK N.A. requested amendment to Conditional Use Planned Developments (Cases 79S079 and 84S178) to permit a freestanding sign for an individual business within a shopping center or similar group of build- ings. This request lies in a Convenience Business District on a 1.0 acre parcel fronting approximately 220 feet on the south line of Iron Bridge Road, approximately 190 feet east of Beach Road. Tax Map 95-12 (5) Courthouse Cormmons, Block B, Lot 1 (Sheet 31). Mr. Sullivan disclosed to the Board that he has a credit card account with Signet Bank, N.A. which total amount may exceed $10,000 within the period of one year, declared a conflict of interest pursuant to the virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act and excused himself from the meeting. Mr, Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission and staff recommended denial of Case 89SN0144; however, the recently adopted Zoning Ordinance permits requests such as this to have freestanding signs for individual outparcels but that such signs be limited to 20 square feet and 8 feet in height. Mr. John G. Dicks, III, representing the applicant, stated the sign height and area permitted by the new Zoning Ordinance was acceptable; stated that the Chesterfield County Bisterlsal Society met on November 7, 1988, and unanimously endorsed, through the Magnolia Grange Steering Committee, the requested sign proposal and conveyed, on behalf of Ms. Mary Ellen Mowe, support for the request. There was no opposition present. When asked, Mr. Jacobsen explained the sign, ss proposed, does not meet the current special zoning restrictions on the subject parcel; however, when the major amendments to the Zoning Ordinance were adopted, freestanding signs are permitted for individual outparcels in an office park development and the proposed sign does meet those requirements. On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Currln, the Board approved Case 89SN0144, subject to the following condition: A single free-standing sign shall be permitted, the height and area of which shall ~omply with the requirements of Chapter 21.1 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin and Mr. Mayes. Absent: Mr. Daniel and Mr. sullivan. Mr. sullivan returned to the meeting. 88SN0063 In Midlothian Magisterial District, CONTEL CELLULAR, INC. requested Conditional Use Planned Development to permit a 198 foot tower plus bulk (setback) exceptions in a Convenience Business (B-l) District. This request lie~ on a 0.2 acre parcel fronting approximately 40 feet on the west line of Buford Road, approximately 500 feet north of Midlothian Turn- pike. Tax Map 18-15 (1) Part of Parcel 16 (Sheet 89-510 ~r. Jacobsen stated the applicant requested Qaae 88SN8063 be with~rawn. opposition present. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board accepted withdrawal of CaSe 85SN0063. Ayes! M~. Applegat¢, Mr. Currin, Mr, ~ayes and Mr. S~llivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel, In Dale ~agi~E~rial District, ~LD~WA¥ D~O~ COMPAI~ requested rezoning ~rom Residential (R-15) to Residentiat Multi-family (R-MF) and ~o~unity Busi~e~ (~-2) with Condi- tional Use Planned Development to permit use exceptionE. A Th~s request lie~ on a ~3.0 acre parcel fronting apprcximat~5~ 3~050 fesf ~n the nGrth t~ne of Chippe~ham ~a~kway, also ~rontinq approx~atel~ 2,000 feet on the west line of Iron Bridge Road, and located in the northwemt quadrant ef the inter~ectiOn ~f these roads. Tax Map 41-13 (1) ~arQ~l ~0; Tax ~ap 41-14 (1) Parcels 5 an~ 6; and Ta~ Map 41-14 (5) Royal Oak, Section A, Block A, Lots 2 ~rough 5 (~h~et 15}. Mr. Jacobsen ~tated the applicant and Mr. Daniel, Da~e b~ deferred for thirty (30) days. Mr. John Coqbill, representing th~ applicant, stated a thirty (30) day deferral i~ reques~e~ in order to meet w~th a~ea present. on motion of ~x. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Maye~ the Board d~fxrred Ca~e 89SN0120 until May 2~, 1989. A~ent: Mr. Daniel. 89~N0199 In Clover Hill Magisterial Dis~rio~, ~O~¢~A'~t~: A~SO'~IA'I~S requested ~endment to conditional Use Plannad Developmenf (Ca~e 85S076] relative to tko maximum allowable height and gro~$ floor area of buildinq~ in an Office Business District. Thi~ requesL lies on a ~.4 acre parcel frontinq and fronti~q approximately 2,000 fast on the we~t line of Powhite Parkway, and located in th~ southwest q~adrant of the and 23 and Part of Parcel 8 {Sheet for thirty (30) days and since the Co, lesion deferred cas~, it would be aDDropriate for the Board to also defer the Ms. Lisa Jones, representing the reque$=, s=ated the applicant desires a thirty (30) day deferral to continue discussion with ar~a homsowner~ an~ to clarify GO~CeX~S relative to t~affic. There was no opposition present. 89-511 On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board deferred Ca~e 89SN0199 until May 24, 1989. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Mayes and Mr. SUllivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 89SN0103 (kmended) In Matoaca Magisterial District, SWIFT CREEK DE%~ELO~MENT ASSOCIATES requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-25). A single family residential subdivision is planned. This request lies on a 270 acre parcel frontinq approximately 3,400 feet on the west line of Bradley Bridge Road, across from Glebe Point Road. Tax Map 131-9 (1) Parcel 1 and Tax Map 131-14 (1) Parcel 1 (Sheet 40). Mr. Jacobsen stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of Case 89SN0103, subject to a single condition and acceptance of the applicant's proffered conditions. Be stated the applicant has agreed to abide by the County's Septic Tank Policy as adopted by the ~oard of Supervisors. Mr. Currin disclosed to the Board that he owns property across from the subject parcel, declared a confliot of interest pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act and excused himself from the meeting. Mr. Jeff Collins, representing the applicant, stated the recommended condition was acceptable. There was no opposition present. Mr. MayeD stated he felt a precedent had been set relative to the use of septic tanks and, ~ince the applicant has indicated his willingness to abide by the County's Septic Tank Policy as adopted by the Board of Supervisors, he saw nO reason not to approve the request. On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board approved Case $95N0103, subject tc the following condition: A fifty (50) foot buffer strip, exclusive of ease- ments and required yards, shall be established and maintained adjacent to Bradley Bridge Road (Route 631). The area of this buffer strip shall either be left in its natural state, if sufficient vegeta- tion exists to provide adequate screening; or be planted and/or bermed in accordance with a landscape plan approved by the Planning Department, if suffi- cient vegetation does not exist to provide adequate screening. Prior to approval ef any final site plan Or recordation of any plat, the developer shall flag this buffer strip for inspection, and shall post a bond to cover the implementation of the landscape plan, if such plan is required. Except for approved public road access(es), no access shall be permitted through this buffer strip. This buffer strip shall be noted on any final site plans, and any final check and recordation plats. The Ptanninq Commission or Director of Planning may modify this condition at the time of tentative subdivision review. (P&T) And further, the Board accepted the following proffered conditions: 1. Maximum number of lots will be 150. 2. Restrictive covenant~ equivalent to Glebe covenants, as attached. 3. 2000 square feet minimum heated living area. Point West 89-512 4, Appl£oant to not%fy GleD~ Point eoord%netor 30 days prior to public hearing for subdivision plan approval. No lof shall b~ 1~ than one (%) acre in size. ~o foundations shall have exposed concrete blocks. 7. The applicants will abide ~y ~he eennty septic system policy az finally adopted by the Board of Supervisors. Ay~: Mr. Appl~a~e, Mr. ~ayes and Mr. Sullivan, Absent: ~r. Cnrrin and Mr. Daniel, ~r. Cnrrin rsturned to ths meeting. 99SN0149 (Amended] In Matoaca Magisterial District, S~R~ORD D~I~ requested rezoninq ~rom Agricultural IA] to Residential (R-12]~ plus Conditional Use to permit an outdoor recreational facili~ ty. A ~ingle family residential subdivision is planned. Thi~ request %ie~ on a 253,0 acrs parcel lying appr0~imate%y feet o~f ~ke east line of Win~rpock Road, al~o lying approximately 4,000 f~t north of Beach Road. Tax ~ap 91 approval of Ca~e 89S~0I~9~ subject to certain conditions and ~r. Applegate disclosed to th~ ~oard ~a~ he is an owner and conflict of inter~$t pursuant to the Virginia Comprehengive Conflict of Interest Act and excused himself f~om th~ meeting. Mr. Clark Plaxco, representing %he appllcan~, stated the zeco~ended conditions wsr~ accep~abl~. There wa6 approved Case SgSND149, mu~jec~ ~o ~h~ following t. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan and the Conaid~red the Master Plan for th~ outdoor facility. 2. A fifty (50) foot buffer mtrip~ exclusive of eam~m~n%s and adjacent to Winterpo~k Roa~ {Rou%~ 621), M~nSley Road within th~ project, ~he area of these buffer strip~ ~kal% ~i~er ~e l~ft in it~ natural state, if or be planted and/or be~ed in accordance with a land- scape plan approved by the Planning D~partmen%, if quate ~creenin~+ Prior to approval of any ~inal plag or recordation of any plat, the developer shall flag the~ buffer strips for inspection, and shall post plan, if such plan is required. ExCept for approved public road aoce~(e~), no accass ~hatl be pe~itted through this buffer strip. This buffer strip shall noted on any final site plans, and any ~inal check and recordation plats. The Planning Co~ission or of Planning may modify ~his condition at the time of ~9-513 This condition supersedes Proffered Condition 2 on following proffered (NOTE: page 4.) And further, the Board accepted the conditions: 1. County water and sewer shall be used. 2. Forty-five (45) feet of right of way for the entire length of the property which abuts Henslsy Road and Winterpock Road measured from the centerline, shall be dedicated to and for the County of Chesterfield, free and unrestricted. 3. The developer shall provide for relocation of the ditch section to en~ure adequate shoulders along the east side of Hensley Road, from opposite the south corner o~ the subject property abutting Hensley Road, north to the point 300 ~ 500 feet beyond the proposed intersection of the north-south connector road and Hensley at Brandy Oaks. The exact location of these improvements shall be determined at the time of tentative review. 4. The applicant shall install a uniform and effective signage system throughout the development and will at the appropriate time submit a complete siqnage concept to the Planning Commission for review and approval. 5. The maximum number of units permitted in the R-12 district will be 375. 6. A community a~ociation will be established to manage and maintain open space within the R-12 district, including the 5.50 acre recreation ~ite. 7. Hours of operation shall be limited from 8:00 a,m. to 10:80 p.m., Sunday through Thursday; and from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., Friday and Saturday. 8. Parking shall be provided on the basis of one (1) space for each ninety (90) square feet of combined swimming and wading pool areas, and four (4) spaces for each tennis court. 9. There shall be no outside public addrmss system or speakers. 10. All exterior lights shall be arranged and installed so that the direct or reflected illumination does not exceed 0.5 foot candles above background measured at the lot line of any adjoining residential parcel. Light standards shall be of a directional-type capable of shielding the light source from direct view from any adjoining parcel or public right of way. Purther, no exterior lighting shall be higher than twenty (201 feet. 11. One (1) sign, to be located at the entrance to the recreation center, shall be permitted. This sign shall neither be luminous nor illuminated. A rendering of this sign shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval prior to erection. 12. In conjunction with final site plan review, and prior to the release of building permits, a detailed landscape plan for the site shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. This plan shall incorporate pedestrian and bicycle paths to provide the greatest possible safety and convenience from surrounding residential development. k thirty (30] foot building setback and buffer strip, exclusive of easements, parking aieas, and recreation facilities shall be ~stablish~d and maintained along all property lines of the site. The area within the 89-514 I47 Condition 6). Ne access shall be p~rmitted through this buffer, except for two {2~ entrance driveways and Transfer of ownership and maintenane~ raspQnsibility for permits for the recreational facilities, or prior to a bond being posted providing for 100% surety of the completion of all improvements to be made. retention faeility(i~) (subject to gcverr~ental agency approval) adequate to retain post-development ]0 year storm and releas~ pze-develepment 2 year storm for ghat partier of the drainage basin upstream of Spring Run ease number 899N0149). AyeE: Mr, Cue~in, Mr. Mayas and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Applegate and Mr. Daniel. Mr. Applega%e returned to the meeting. 89SN0162 In Matoaca Magisterial District, O9~O LOFI~ amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development (Case relative to uses. A light indue%rial complex is planned. This ~equest lies in a ~igkt Industrial {M-i~ District on a 0.9 acr~ parcel fronting approximately 40 feet on the south llu~ of ~ull Street Road, approximately 220 feet east of Suncrest Drive. Ta~ Map 49-11 (11 Parcel 12 (Sheet 14). ~r. Jacobsen stated the Planning Co~t~i~s~On xecemmended approval of Case 89S~0162, subject to certain cenditienm. Mr. Keith Goodrich, represent{ns the applicant, stated the recommended conditions were acceptable. There was no apposition present. on motion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board approved Case 89ZN016], subject to ~he following 1. The following conditions notwi%hstandlng, the 91an pre- pared by Balser and Associates, I~d.~ dated December 23, 1988, shall be considered the Master Plan. (P) (NOT~: This condition supersedes Condition l of Case 84S179.) 2. Uses shall be I~mited to the following: a. All uses permitted in %he Light Industrial District; and b, Contractor"s shops tn include, but not be ed to, ~lectrical, plumbing, heatlmg and air e0ndltioning businesses. (P} a. This condition super~ede~ Condition 7 of Ca~e 84SI79. b. Outside storage is not permitted in Light Industrial (M-l] Districts.) 3. Setbasks and parking areas ~hall be landscaped in accor- dance with Corridor Overlay District standards. (P) 89-515 (ROTE: This conditions is in addition to conditions of zoning approval for Case 8&S179.) 4. Signs shall comply with Corridor Overlay District requirements. (P) (ROTE: Thi~ condition is in addition to conditions of zoning approval for Case 84S179.) (ROTES: a. Conditions 2 through 6 of Case 84S179 remain in effect. b. Prior to any site improvements, site plans must be submitted for approval.) Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currln, Mr. Mayas and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 89SN0172 In Midlothian Magisterial District, BASS~TT & COF~P~%N~{ (A ViRGINIA PARTNERSHIP) r~quested amendment to conditions of a previous rezoninq (Case 736-100) relative to buffers. This request lles in a Community Business (B-2) District on a 1.7 acre parcel fronting approximately 100 feet On the north line of Midlothian Turnpike, also fronting approximately 383 feet on the south line of Robious Road, and located approximately 800 feet west of the intersection of these roads. Tax Map 17-7 (1) Parcel 21 (Sheet 8). Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of Case 895N0172, subject to a single condition and acceptance of the applicant's proffered conditions. Mr. Oliver Rudy, representing the applicant, stated the recommended condition was acceptable. There was no opposition present. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board approved Case 89SN0172, subject tO the following condition: Within the required setback alonq Robious Road, landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance requirements for Perimeter Landscaping C. (ROTE: This condition supersedes the buffer condition of Case 73S100.) And further, ~he Board accepted the following proffered conditions: 1. Access to Robious Road shall be limited to one (1) en- trance/exit. This access shall be located towards the western property line, as approved by the Transportation Department. 2. An additional lane of pavement, curb, and gutter shall be conetructed along Robious Road for the entire property frontage. A right-turn lane shall also be provided for the approved access. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, forty-five (45) feet of right of way, measured from ~he cen~erllne of Robious Road, shall be dedicated to and for Chestsrfleld County, free and unrestricted. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr, Currin, Mr. Mayes and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 89~516 ~9SN0176 In Bermuda Magisterial District, AIR ~RDD~C?~ AND INC. requested Conditional Use to permit retail sales in a General Industrial (M-2] District. This request Ife~ on a acre parcel lying approximately 6Q feet off the northwest terminus o~ Bermuda Triangle Read. Tax Map 117-5 (1) Part of Parcel 16 [Skeet 33). Mr. Jacobsen ~tated the Planning Cc~mission recem~en~d approval of Case 89SN0176, subject to certain Mr. Put~ Kolurik, representing the applicant, sta~ed the recommended Go~ditions were acceptable. There was nO opposition present. On morion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board approved Case 89SN~176, subject to the following conditions: 1. Th= plan preDare~ by J.K. T~ons and A~oeiates, dated August 26, 1988, shall b~ consider~d the ~aster Plan. 2. Retail ~ale~ of industrial, medical, and Sp=ciulty gas containers and welding ~quip~nt shall be pe~i%t~d conducted in GonjunGtion with the gas con=ain,t df~t~ibu- Ayes~ Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. ~ayss and ~r. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. ~9SM0207 In Clover ~ill Magisterial District, WA]~R~ A. NO~ requoste~ Conditional Use to permit a beauty s~up in an Agricultural District, This request lies on a 0.7 acre parcel frontinq approximately 79.5 feet on the east lin~ of Rubbers Road, approximately 450 fee= south of Midis%blah Turnpike. Tax Map 18-16 {1) Parcel I~ (Sh==t 8}. Mr. Jacobsen stated th~ Planning Con, lesion approval of Case 89S~0207, subject to certain conditions. ~r. Warren A. Noel stated the recommended conditions were acceptable. Th~e ws~ no opposition pr~nt. On motion of Mr. Applegatu, seconded by Mr. C~rrin, the Board approved Case $9sN0207, subject to the following conditions: 1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan submitted with the application shall be considered the Master Plan. 2. Other than normal maintenance or cosmetic improvements~ no addition~ shall be p~rmitte~ ~e acco~unodate this use. The r~$idential appearance of the structure shall be maintained. 3. Unl~ driveways ~n~ parking areas ar~ paved in accordance with Zonin~ Ordinance r=C£ulr=ments, a maximum of five (~) park%ng spaces ~halt be provided. Per f~ve [5) or less parking spaces, the driveway and parking area~ ~hall be gravele~ with a minimu~ ef six (6) inehe~ e~ ~21 or ~21A stone. Ail graveled perking and driveway areas shall be d~linea~ed by p~rmanent msan~ (i.e. concrete bumper block~, ~imbers, etc.) 4. Signs shall be as regulated by the Zoning Ordinance in the '~SpscLal Sign District" for Convenience Business zoninq. (P) (Rote: Prior to any site improvements, site plans must be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Mayes and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 89SN0208 In Bermuda Magisterial District, C~S~FIELD COUNT~ BeAle) OF SUPER¥I80~ requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) of 15.0 acres, General Business (B-3) of 0.6 acres, and Light Indus- trial {M-l) of 50.06 acres, to General Industrial (M-2} with Conditional Use Planned Development. An industrial complex is planned. This request lies on a total of 66.2 acres fronting approximately 1,050 feet on the south line of Ruffin Mill Road, also fronting approximately 2,300 feet on the east line of the Richmond-Petersburg Turnpike, and located southeast of the intersection of these roads. Tax Map 150-9 (1) Parcels 1 and 4 and Tax Map 150-13 (1) Paroel 1 and Part of Parcel 6 (Sheet 42). Mr. Jacobsen stated at the March 22, 1989 meeting it was determined that appropriate official action had not been taken to initiate the subject request; therefore, the Board took said action and remanded the came to the Planning Co~mission for consideration. Re stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of Case 89SM0208, subject to certain conditions. Ms. Jennifer Lantz, representing the request, stated the reco~mended conditions were acceptable. There was no opposition present. Mr. Currin stated, for the record, the application submitted for this request originated with the Ecdnomic Development Department on behalf Of a foreign investor who had requested that department to handle the request. He stated it was his understanding that certain investors do not wish to be identified until after negotiations have been completed and they have made a decision as to where they wish to locate. Re suggested that the Board consider addressing fhis issue collectively to decide what type policy they wish to utilize in the future regarding such matters. On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. sullivan, the ~oard approved Case 89SN0208, subject to the following conditions: 1. There shall be no unpainted metal buildings. Colors shall be subdued. The use of ornamental and/or decorative features, such as trim, landscaping, and surfaces composed of varied materials and/or textures, shall be encouraged. In conjunction with final site plan review, colored ren- derings or elevations of structures shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. (P) 2. All loading and outside storage areas shall be screened from view of Ruffin Mill Road and Route 95. A screening plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval in conjunction with final site plan review, 3. All publio and prlvats roads, drlvsways, loading areas, and parking areas shall be paved with concrete, bituminous concrete, er similar material. Surface treated parking areas and drives shall be prohibited. Concrete curb and gutter, as deemed neoessary by Environmental Engineering for drainage and/or erosion control purposes, shall be installed around the perimeter of all paved areas. (P&EE) 4. Signs shall comply with the requirements of the Special Sign District for Office Business (O) Districts. (P) 89-518 (NOTE~ The Special exception {Casa 76A13Q) remains in effect for Parcel 1, Tax Map 5. A twenty-five (25) foot parking setback and a fifty foot building setback shall be maintained along public and private roads. Within %hess setbacks, landscaping con- sisting of trees and/or shrub~ mhall be in,tailed to break up the view of large expanses of buildings and parking areas as viewed from roads. A detailed landscaping plan depicting these requirements shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval in with final cite plan ~sview. 6, A fifty (50) foot buffer cheil be maintained adjacent to the Swift Creek floodplain. NO buildings, driveways, p~rklng, or other facilities ~hall bs permitted within thi~ buffer. Public road~ water related transportation facilitiec (i.e., docks, e~o.), and utilities may be pe~mitted geDerally perpendicular through this ~uffer upon approval by the Planning and Transportation Departments at the time of schematic plan review. At the ti~e of cchematic plan review for each individual parcel or lot which abuts the buffer, a conceptual landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Planning D~partment for approval. The conceptual landscapln~ plan shall the g~nernl location of eximting vegetation to be refmined, the location of proposed vegetative screening, and extent of planting within the buffer. A d~tailed landscaping plan shal~ be submitted to ~'~e Planning Department for review and approval within ninety (90) days after rough clearing and grading of each si~e. In where substantial completion cf rough grading is not complete at the date of this submission, an appropriate cxtenslon may be granted by the Planning Department. 7. The floodplain along swift Creek shall be maintained in a natural state and there shall be no clearing, grading, ~illing, or any ~aciliti~s permitted within this floodplain. This ¢o~di~ien may be modlf~ed by the Planning snd Enviror~ental ~ngin~ering Departments to permit necessary Utility uses and water related trans- portation facilities (i+e.~ docks, etc.). The following uce~ ~hall ~e permitted: a. Ail Light Industrial (M-I} uses. Ail General Industrial (M-2) uge~ ~xcept sani- vertising signS. e. P~blic and private utility us~s, so long as ~hey liquified pe=roleum gas, Iiqnified petroleum ga~ (LPG), and petroleum% produc~s transmission facilities; in addition, natural gas, liquified mission facilities above- or below-ground. (P) Schematic plans which conform to the conditions of zoning may b~ approved by the Planning Department. The of the Directo~ of Plannlnq~ relative to schematic plan Public water and wastewa%ex systems shall be used. Prior to schematic plan submittal for any use, the fire flow demands {flow and pressure) shall bs ~ubmitted to the D~partment of Utilities, Planning Section. The d~sig~ of all on-sits water main extensions shall be coordinated with adjacent properties to the east. (U) 10. 89-519 1I. All storm Water conveyance systems shall have rigid lin- ings. This condition may be modified by Envirenmental Engineering at the time of site plan review. (ES) 12. Priori to any clearing or grading, an erosion control and drainage plan shall be submitted to ~nvironmental Engineering for review and approval. (~) I3. Unless otherwise appreved by Environmental Engineering, all site drainage for developed areas shall be designed to drain to Swift Creek. (EE) 14. ~rior to the issuance of a building permit, forty-five (45) feet of right of way, measured from the centcrliee of Ruffin Mill Read, shall be dedicated to and for the County of Chesterfield, free and unrestricted. (T) 15. Additional pavement shall be provided along Ruffin Mill Road for the entire property frontage. (T) 16. The parking setback for property adjacent to Ruffin Mill Road shall be maintained as a buffer. Other than util- ities, access as approved by the Transportation Depart- meet, landscaping, and signs, there shall be no facilities permitted within this buffer. (P&T) Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin and Mr. sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. Abstention: Mr. Mayes. 89SN0118 In Matoaca Magisterial District, NEW GOLF ASSOCIATES LIF~TTED PARTNERSHIP requested amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development (Case 83S013) relative to the transfer of operating rights, plus use and bulk exceptions to permit the expansion of an outdoor recreational facility. This request lies in General Business (B-3), Community Business (E-2), and Agricultural (A) Districts on a 13.6 acre parcel fronting approximately 357 feet on the south line of Hell Street Road, approximately 450 feet east of Suncrest Drive. Tax Map 49-7 [1) Parcel 40 and Tax Map 49-11 (1} Parcel 16 (Sheet 14). Mr. Jaeobson stated at its March 22, 1989 meeting the Board deferred Case 89SN0118 in order to address the Chairman's concerns relative to access for the proposed use. He stated several meetings were held to discuss improvements to the existing crossover on Route 360 to better facilitate traffic movements and, subsequent to that meeting, the applicant submitted a proffered condition agreeing to pay one-half the cost of a signal up to a maximum of $30,000 in the event either Chesterfield County or the Virginia Department of Transporta- tion installs a traffic signal at the main entrance to the Rockwood Square Shopping Center on U.S. Route 360 within eighteen (18) months of the date of the proffer. He stated the Planning Commission recommended denial of an exception to the Corridor Overlay District requlremcnts relative to sign re- quirements and approval of an amendment to permit expansion o~ the outdoor recreational facility, subject to certain condi- tions, He further explained the signage permitted in the new Zoning Ordinance which was adopted subsequent to the Planning Commission's action and noted that the applicant was willing to reduce the sise of this sign to comply with the new Ordinance. Mr. Ed Kidd, representing the applicant, stated the recommended conditions were acceptable with the exception of Conditions 4 and 7 which he requested be modified to permit a freestanding sign and nO direct access from the proposed development onto Route 360 unless approved by the Transportation Department. There was no opposition present. 89-520 When asked, Mr. McCracken stated that VDOT intends to proceed with th~ innkatlation of signalization at the main entrance to the Rockwood Square Shopping Center. On mot~on of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Cuxrin, the Board ApproVed Case $95N0118, subject to the following conditions~ 1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre- pared by Intertech Group, revised Nove~ber 2, 1988, and =he building elevations submitted with the application, ~hall be considered the Master Plan. 2. A fifty (50) foot buffer ~h~ll be maintained along the southern property boundary ad~acent to residentially zoned property. E~iatin~ vegetation within this buffer shall be msintalne~, where possible, and snpplemented, where neces- sary, with landscaping and/or s=reenlng devices so as to provide ye~r-ronnd screening of the view of facilities from adjacent property. This buffer skalt be provided with a readily available source of water for irrigation purposes. Other than laDdsoaping, fencing or other screenin~ devises, irrigation~ and utilities that run generally p~rpsnd%¢ular through this bu~er, there shall be no facilitie~ located within th~ b~ffer. Clearing for any f~n~ and/or other decerativm fmature shall not exceed a w~dth of five (5) feet. At th~ tim~ of site plan re- view, a dots%led landscaping plan shall ha s~bmitted for review and approval. The detailed plan shall include the general location of existing vegetation to be retained, the loss=ion of proposed landscaping and fencing. (P] 3. Within the Agricultural (A) 9ertion of the property, uses shall b~ limited to the £ollowing~ a) Golf driving range; b) Customary and incidental accesSOry u~ea to the permitted use. ~i~hiD =he Community B~sln~ss (~-2) portion of =he prope~- ty~ us~s shall be limited to the foilowing: a) Golf driving range; b) Pre shop, as generally 4opiated on the Mas=ur Plan; permitted nMOS. within the General Bu~ina~ (8-3) portion of the property, uses shall bs limited to the following: a} Ail uses permitted in t_he ~-3 D~stri~ by right; b) Miniature golf course~; Patting cage$'~ d) Indoor recreational uses; Customary and incidental ao0essory noes to the 4. A single freestanding sign, not to ~xceed a height of eight (B) feet a~d an area of twen~y {20) feet, shall be permitted. All signs shall comply with th~ Corridor overlay District standard~ as regulated by the Zoning Ordinance. [P) 5. Development shall comply with the Rou~e ~O Corridor Overlay District standard~ as regulated by the Zoning Ordinance. (P) 6. Parking shall be provided based on ~he ~ollowing ratios: s) Driving range 1.~ ~paees per each tee. bl ~at~ing cages 1~2 spaces per each cage. 89-521 c) Miniature golf 3.0 spaces for each hole for the first 18 holes, plus 2.0 spaces ~or each hole for the second 18 holes, plus 1.0 space for each hole thereaf- ter. d) All other uses Based on Zoning Ordinance requirements for the specif- ic use. (P) 7. There shall be no direct access from this development onto Route 360 unless approved by the Transportation Depart- ment. (T) (NOTE= This condition does not preclude this development sharing acce~ with the existing adjacent development~.) (NOTES= (a) These conditions supersede all previously imposed conditions for Case 8'3S013. (b) Prior to obtaining a building permit, site plans must be submitted for review and approval.) And further, the Board .accepted the following proffered condition: If Chesterfield County or the Virginia Department of Transportation installs a traffic siqnal at the main entrance to the Rockwood Square Shopping Center on U.S. Route 360 within 18 months from the date of thi~ letter (i.e., April 19, 1989), New Golf Associates Limited Partnership will pay for one-half (1/2) of the cost of that signal up to the maximum of $30,000. Ayes: Mr. Applegate, Mr. Currin, Mr. Mayes and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 89SN0155 In Clover Hill Magisterial District, ALLEN L. KIDD requested Conditional Use to permi= an office use in an Agricultural (A) District on a 1.3 acre parcel fronting approximately 251 feet on the west line of North Arch Road, approximately 130 feet south of Kniqhtsbridqe Road. Tax Map 28-1 (1) Parcel 1 and Part of Parcel 5 (~heet 8). Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Commission recoF~nended approval of Case 89SN0t55, subject to certain conditions and stated staff has discussed modification to Condition 4 with the applicant to permit non-concrete curbing tO be installed at the parking area. Mr. Allen L. Kidd, representinq ~-he request, stated the recommended conditions, including amended Condition 4, were acceptable. There wa~ no opposition present. On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board approved Ca~e 89SN0175, subject to the following conditions: 1. ~he following conditions notwithstanding, the plan submit- ted with the application shall be considered the plan of development. (P) 2. Other than normal maintenance or cosmetic improvements, no additions or exterior alterations shall be permitted to accommodate this use. The residential appearance of the structure shall be maintained. (P) 89-522 Dzive~ay and parring areas shall be screened from view of adjacent properties to the north, suuth, and west. Screening shall consist of a solid board fence and/or land~eap~ng. The exact method cf screening shall be determined at the time of site plan review. Curb and gutter shall be installed around the perimeter of the parking area. Curbing material such as brick, cobblestone, or timbers shall b~ installed. (NOTE: The Zoning Ordinance r~quires that parking and driveway areas for six (6) or more vehicles be paved.) 5. All improvements shall be deziqned to drain tewazds North Arch Road. 6. Sign~ ~hall be as regulated by %he Zoning Ordinance 7. This Conditional Use shall be granted to end for Allen Kidd only and ~hall nee be transferable nor run with the land. (P&CPC] No more than four (4) employees, not to includ~ Allen Kidd, shall b~ p~mitted. (P&CPC) additions Dr exterior alterations ~h&ll be permitted to a~oo~odat~ this uss. The residential appearance of the str~cture shall be maintained. (P~CPCI Driveway and parking areas shall be screened ~rom view of adjacent prcpartles to the south, east, and Nest. Screen- ing shall consist of a solid board fence and/or landscap- ing, The exact method of screening shall be determined at the ti~e of site plan review. 11. Hours of Operation shall be limited to between 8:30 a.m. and ~:O0 p.m., ~onday through Friday. There ~hall be no Saturday or Sunday business activity on-si~e. {~CPC) 12. This Conditional Use shall be limited to the operatiuu of Alien Kidd's insurance company. (P&CPC) (~QT~: Prior to obtaining a building ~ermit, sits plans must be submitted for review and approval.) Ayes: Mr, Applegate, Mr. Currin, ~r. ~ayes and ~r. Absent: Mr. Daniel, 89SN0175 {Amended) In Midlothian Magisterial District, C~--~ASHINGTON D~_JuO~T CORPOP~TION requested rezoning fro~ Agricultural (A) and Convenience Business (s-l} to Residential (R-15) of 1.]2 acre~ and General Business (B-3) with Conditional Use Planned Development of 1~.~9 acres tc permit bulk (parking space size and set_back} exceptions. A shopping center is planned. Thi~ roquest lies on a 1~.4 acre parcel fronting a~proximately 88I feet on the north line of Midlothian Turn- pike, acro~ fre~ Mcurefield Park Drive. Ta~ Map 17-12 {1) Parcels 6, 7, 8~ 10~ 11, 12, and 30 and Tax Map 1R-9 (1} Parcel Mr. Peele presented an overview of case 89SN0175 and stated the Planning Commissiun recoImnended approval, subject to certain conditions. Mr. Fred Bernhart, representing the applicant, stated the recommended conditions ere acceptabl~ with the exception cf Conditions 6 and 12. ~s requested Condition 6 be a/~ended to 89-523 permit screening of solid waste storage areas from view of adjacent property owners versus their being separated from view by the principal buildings and elimination of Condition 12 relative to density of the proposed development as such a restriction would not be economically feasible particularly since there were no definitive anchor tenants at this time. Mr. Steve Tokarz, a resident of Brighton Green Subdivision, expressed concerns relative to there being no extension of stub roads from the undeveloped portion of the developer's property into Brighton Green Subdivision and that such property be zoned for residential development; stated he felt the developer had adequately addreased area residents concerns; and voiced support for the proposed request. There was no opposition present. Mr. Sullivan stated he felt this proposal represented a fine exampl~ of good developer/neighborhood cooperation; referenced a letter to Mr. Jacobsen from Mr. Bernhardt regarding site plans being submitted to the Planning Commission for approval; and stated he felt amendment of Condition 6 and elimination of Condition 12, as suggested by Mr. Bernhardt, would not have a detrimental impact on those concerned. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board approved Case 89SN0175, subject to the following conditions: 1. The following conditions notwithstanding, tho plan pre- pared by Biqnell Watkins Architects, P.A., dated January 16, 1989, the TeXtual Statement dated January 31, 19S9~ and March 9, 1989, shall be considered the Master Plan. 2. The public washewaher system shall be used. (U) (NOTE: Use of public water is required by Ordinance.) 3. Prior to site plan submittal, a report shall be submitted to the Utilities Department's Planning Section, describing the manner in which the proposed development will bo served by the public water and washewater systems. This report shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: a) Overall plan of proposed water distribution and wastewater collection systems, showing both on-and off-site lines and their sizes; and b) Anticipated domestic and fire flow demands (minimum required pressure for fire protection as recommended by Fire ~rotoction Bureau) and waatewater flows. In conjunction with approval of the report, the Utilities Department may impose additional requirements deemed necessary to insure adequate capacity to serve the development. (U) 4. The developer shall provide an accurate account of the drainage situation, showing existing drainage and the impact this project will have on the site and the sur- rounding area. Prior to any site plan submittal, the owner/developer shall submit a plan to Environmental Engineering and VDOT providing for on- and off-site drainage facilities to be utilized in the hydraulic engineering of the project. This plan shall be approved by the environmental Engineering Department and VDOT, and all necessary easements shall be obtained prior to clearing any of the land. The approved plan shall be implemented prior to the issuance of any occupancy permits. 89-524 a) This condition supersedes the Textual Statement, Proffers to Land Use Amendment Application, 7. At the time of site plan review, additional reco~endations relative to on- and off-site drainage improvements may be made, based upon the resnlts of this plan.} 5. Except as specified herein and except for she side yard setback along the western property line wh~re adjacent commercial zoning, the ~evelopment shall conform to the corridor Overlay District standards. (NOTE: This condition is in addition to th~ Textual relative to landscaping.) 6. Solid waste ~torage areas shall, observe the required parkiag setbacks. Further, solid waste storage areas (dumpeter~ qarbage cans, trash compactors, etc.} be screened from view of adjacent properties and p~blic rights of we~ by a solid fence, wall, dense evergreen plantings or architectural feature. Solid waste storage areas located within 1,00O feet of any property zoned residentially ox any property ~sed for residential purposes shall net h~ ~erviced b~tween the hcux$ of p.m. and 6:00 a.m. 7. Stacking spaae shall be provided for any use having drive-through facilities or ar~as having drop-off and pick-up areas. Stacking spaces shall have a ~inimum length of eighteen (18) feet. Stacking spaces shall oonfox~ to the parking setback. Stackinq spaces shall be designed so as not fo impede on and off-site traffic movements or movements into and out cf parking spaces. Stacking spaces shall be separated from ethos internal driveways with raised medians, ae deemed necessary for traffic movement or ~afety, by the Director of Plan- ning. Stacking spaces shall be provided as follows: a. Ban~s or other financial institutions with drive-in windows: four {4} stacking spaces for the first drive-in window plus two (2) stacking sp~ces for each additional window. b. Drive-in or fast food restaurants: six (6} stacking spaces for the first drive-in window, plus two (2) stacking spaces for sash addltfonal window. c. Other use~ with drive-in windows such as dry cleaners, convenience stores, etc.: Three stacking spates for each window. 8. A ~inimum sevenf~-fi~e (75) foot buffer, twenty-five I25} feet of which may be provided on the Residential (R-15) portion of the request property shall be maintained along the northern boundary of the B-2 tract. This barfer shall be designed to provide a horizontal distance and open space between the project and adjacent re~idences~ pre- serve vegetation; provide tra~sltion and separation; reduce noise and glare; and/er maintaim privacy. The buffer shall previd~ intermittent visual separation tween uses. where =nrelated activitie~ are located tent to o~e another, the bu£~er shall be used to ensure compat~ility be~ween adjacent u~es. a. Existing mature vegetation located within required buffers shall be maintained unless removal is approved by %he Planning Ce~is- ~icn during~ si~e plan approval. Farther, ~9-525 preserved vegetation may be substituted for required landscaping materials upon approval by the Planning Commission durinq site plan approval. b. The buffer shall provide complete visual sepa- ration of loading areas, overhead doors, service areas, trash collection storage areas, and similar uses. The only uses permitted by right in the buffer shall be landscaping and screening as permitted herein; however, the Planning Commission may permit security fencing; utilities which run generally perpendicular through the buffer; pedestrian walkways; retention/detention basins; or similar uses provided the spirit and intent oi the requirement is maintained. d. The requirements for buffers and screening may be waived and/or modified by the Planning Com- mission during Site or subdivision review and approval ii the adjacent property has been zoned for a similar use. e. At a minimum, the buffer shall be planted at 2.0 times the density of Corridor Overlay District standards, Perimeter Landscaping C. f. At the time of site or subdivision plan review, the Planning Commission may require additional landscaping and/or screening. (NOTE: This condition is in addition to the Textual Statement, Proffers to Land Use Amend- ment Application, 3., and supersedes 2., relative to the buffsr along the nOr%tern property boundary.) Signs. bo Except as noted herein, signs shall comply with the requirements of the Special Sign District. Design Conceptl (1) A unified system of signage and graphics shall be designed. The letter style, graphic display, and color of all signage and graphics within the develop- ~ent shall be consistent. Signage concepts shall be considered during the design of buildings, so that signage and graphics are architecturally incorporat- ed into those buildings and the site they inhabit. Stsc, height, location, material, and color shall be compatible with buildings and site design. (2) Freestanding signs shall be encased within a struoture that is architecturally related to and compatible with the main building(s) and overall architectural design of the development. Pylon signs shall be prohibited. (3) Landscapinq shall be integrated with each individual freestanding sign. Clustering of plants shall be required to provide a mix of vegetation. The landscaping required by this condition shall be depict- ed on site plans. 89-526 (c) (d) (4) Illumination. a. External lighting shall be limit- sd to light fixtures using white, not colored, lighting and ~hall not be 51inking, fluctuating, or moving. ~x~ernal lighting 9hall 0nly be permitted i~ the sign face is constructed of natural meterial~ such as wood or stone or man-made materials such am plastic or metal having the appearance of natural material~. External lighting shall be provided by concealed end/or screened spots or floods and shall be arranged and installed so that direct or r~fle¢~e~ illu- minatio~ does not exceed 0.5 foot candles above b&ckground measured at ~he lot line of any adjoining rssidential, townho~se residen- tial, multi-family residential, or agricultural district or publi~ right of way. b. Internal lighting ~hall be limit- si to internal light contained Within translucent letter~ and/or loges and in~ernally illuminated ~iqn boxes, provided th~ back- ground or field on which the copy opaque. The area illuminated is restricted to the sign face only. Ths direct or reftsoted illumination shall not exceed 0.5 foot uandles above hack- ~round measured at the lot line of any. adjoining residen- tial, tuwnhouse r~sfde~tial, multi-family residential or agricultural district or ~ublic ~ight of way. Change- able copy boards ~hal! only bm permitted ~hen incorporated into the pzinsipal sign. changeabl~ ~opy boards may have a translucent signfield. (5) Prior to the erection of any sign, a Eom- prehenslve sign package shell be ~ubmitted to tbs ~lanning Department for approval, The sign package shall pro¥ide detailed renderings to inuluds colors, si~e$, light- ing, location, etc. for ail signs within any development. Interchangeable copy signs shall be allowed only if integrated into a permitted frssstanding or buildlng-mount~ i~enti~isation sign. Unle~ otherwise specifie~, no si~n in thf~ Con~ition shall e~Ce~d a height of ten (10) feet. Dirsutional signs indica=ing location of truck entrences~ employes parking, shipping a~d re- ceiving, and ~imilar aotiviti=s shall be al- lowed, provided that all ~uch nighs are locatmd on ~he proper~¥ of tbs business and no such zign 89-527 10. exceeds five (5) feet in height and eight (8) square feet in area. Directional signs may include business names or loges; however, no more than two (2) such directional signs dis- playing a business name or logo shall be legible from a public right of way. (f) One (1) sign not exceeding 100 square feet in area and twenty (20) feet in height, identifying the development and announcing only the name or location of the development and business names of tenants therein, shall be allowed. (g) Ail individual business signs shall be attached to the main buildinq or major appendage includ- inq, but not limited to canopies, marquees and awnings; however, businesses located on indi- vidual parcels within the project which front on internal public rights of way and/or private accesses shall be permitted a single freestand- ing individual business sign not exceeding 100 square fe~t in area and a height of fifteen (15) feet, provided such signs are not legible to ex- ternal public rights of way. Businesses located on individual parcels which front external public rights of way shall be permitted one (1) freestanding business sign not exceedinq twenty (20) square feet in area and a height of eight (8) feet. (h) Where the side cr rear lot line adjoins a res- idential, townhouse residential, multi-family residential, or agricultural district, the exterior signs shall be attached flat against the building and shall not face the adjacent lot in such district(s) unless suet sign is located at least 150 feet from such district{sI. No sign shall project more than eighteen (18) inches from the building or major appendage. (i) The aggregate area of all businees signs for any one (1) bu$inees shall net exceed 1.75 square feet for each two (2) feet of building frontage provided that a minimum of twenty (20) square feet and ~ maximum of 150 square feet shall be permitted. (P) (j) One (1) detached order board for businesses with drive-through facilities shall be allowed; provided that no such sign shall exceed a height of six (6) feet nor an area of thirty (30) square feet. These signs shall not be included in t~he number of freestanding signs permitted or in the total aggregate sign area. (P) (NOT~: This condition supersedes the ~extual Statement, Pro~ers tn and Use Amendment Application, 10.~ relative to signs). With the approval of this request, a twenty-five (25) foot exception to the fifty (50) foot setback requirement along Route 60 shall be granted. Landscaping within this set- back shall be accomplished in accordance with Perimeter Landscapinq C, of the Corridor Overlay District standards. At the time of site plan review, a conceptual landscaping plan for the setback shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval. A detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval within thirty (30) days of rough clearing and grading. The detailed plan shall include the general location of existing vegetation to be retained and the location of proposed landscaping.) (P) 89-528 (NOTE: Tkia condition supersedes the Textual Proffers to ~he Land Use A~endment Application, 8., reis- give to setbacks along Route 60.) 11. Parking spaces shall have a minimum size of nine by eightesn (18t ~e~t. Parking ar~a~ ~hsI1 be landscaped in accordance with Corridor Overlay District (P) (NOTE: This condition Supersedes the T~Mtual Statement, P~o££er~ to The Land Use Ame~dmen~ A~plicatien, 12., relative to parking area landscaping.) Site plans shall be submit%ed to the Planning Commimsion for approval. (NOT~ Prio~ to ~elease of any building permits~ ~it~ planm must be ~bmitt~d to ths Planning Co~ismion for approval.) Ayes: Mr. Applegats, Mr. C~rri~, ~r. Maye~ and Mr. Sullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Cnrrin, the adjourned at 3:10 p.m. un%il 7~00 p.m. on May 10, 1959. Ayes: Mr. Applegats, Mr. Currin, Mr. Mayes and Mr. ~ullivan. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 89-529 chairman