Loading...
06-14-1989 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVI$O~ 14, 1989 Supervisors ~Atten~an~: Mr. G. H. Applegate, Chairman Mr. C. F. Currin, Jr., Vice Chairman Mr. Harry G. Daniel Mr. Jesse J. Mayes Mr. M. B. Sullivan Mr. Lane B. Ramsey County Administrator Ms. Amy Davis, Exec. Asst. to Co. Admin. Mrs. Doris DeHart~ Asst. Co. Admin., Legis. Svcs. and Intergovern. Affairs . Ms. Joan Dolezal, Clerk to the Board Chief Robert Eanes, Fire Department Mr. Bradford S. Hammer, Deputy Co. Admin., Management Services Mr. Robert ~odder, Building Official Mr. William H. Howell, Dir., Gen. Services Mr. Thomas E. Jacobsen, Dir. of Planning Ms. Mary Leu Lyle, Dir. of Accounting Mr. Robert Masden, Deputy Co. Admln., Human Services Mr. R. J. McCracken, Transp. Director Mr. Richard McElfish, Dir. of Env. Eng. Mrs. M. Arline McGuire, Treasurer's Office Mr. Gary McLaren, Dir. of Economic Developmt. Mr. Steve Micas, Co. Attorney MrS. Pauline Mitchell, Dir. of News/Info. Services Dr. William Nelson, Dir., Health Dept. Col. Joseph Pittman, Chief of Police MS. Jean Smith, Dir. of Social Services Mr. Jay Stegmaier, Dir. of Budget Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr., Dir. of Parks & Rec. Mr. David Welchons, Dir. of Utilities Mr. Frederick Willis, Dir. of Human Resource Management Mr. Applsgats called the meeting to erdar at 12:00 Noon in the Administration Building Conference Room (Room 502). 89-592 Mr. Micas summ~ri~sd and reviewed material relative to significant revisions to the Freedom of Information Act which will be effective July 1, 1989, which included open meeting requirements, recordke~pinq, motions for Executiv~ ~S$1ons to include the identification of applicable codes and substance of the matter(s) to be discussed, roll ~all votiDg, eto. There was brief discussion ~elativ~ =o the definition o£ the ~'officlal records custodian", the individual's identification, respon~ibilitie~ and fun~tioDs, ets. ~r. Daniel suggested =hat a formallzed statement regarding pertinent information relative to the "official r~eord~ custodian'~ be disseminated so that those individaal~ intera~ted in obtaining information Under the Freedom of Information Act may be advised as tO the appropriate resources for obtaining such information. Mr. ~ioas and ~rs. DeHart presented and briefly explained each program item of the preponed ~raft 1959 General A~ze~bly Legislation affecting County busine~ r~qui~ng further action did ~ot fe~l he ~5o~Id b~ present during discussion of item, declared a po=eh=iai conflict of interese pursuant to the h~self from the m~sting. Upon conclusion of discussion of Senate Bill 6Ol, Mr. Daniel returned %o the meeting. After t~nq~y discussion, i% was generally agreed %hat a policy 1411 requiring applicants for zoning amen~ents and variances to disclose the equlta~le ownership of ~h~ affected real aerate under considers%ion for purchase with County funds aD~ %htr staff proceed wish forwarding S~ch ~raft ordinance %o the Planning Co~ission for review and recc~endation through ~ubllc hearing process; that more info.atica be discussed, with the exception of those on which it was dete~ine~ no action weuld be taken, w~r~ specifically agreed upon ~y the ~oard of Supervisors as the Legislative Packet. Mr. Jacobsen presented a summarization of background financial Boar~ Qf Supervieere to establieh conditional zoning authority provide for voluntary cash proffering as part ol a rezoning or con,trusting ne~essar~ public facilities to support residentlal development; the schedule fur the public hearings and adoption of the enabliu$ conditional zoning amendment and conditional zoning policy to permit acceptance of cash proffers for zoning application~: infill development; ~he potential impact on agricultural and forestal areas; adoption of policy to guide the procedural, legal and financial ~uid~lin~S for the administration of conditional zoning applications: consideration on a case-by-case ba~ig of cash proffers for 89-593 prior to the acceptance of cash proffers; the effective date of said 'ordinance as applicable to rezoning applications and zoning amendments; credits for dedication of real property and improvements; crc. Mr. Jacobsen indicated a Board paper to refer the proposed cash proffer policy/ordinance to the Planning Commission for review and reco~endation and to set a public hearing date for the Board of Supervisors to consider said ordinance. Mr. Applegate excused himself from the meeting. It was generally agreed to recess for five minutes. Reoonvening: 1.C. GROLrP ~OMES, GROUP CARE FACILITIES AND HALFWAY ~OUSES Mr. Jacobsen presented a summarization of background information and staff proposals for amendment to the Zoning Ordinance relative to group homes, group care facilities and halfway houses, explaining definitions, uses as permitted by the current ordinance and the proposed ordinance, etc. stated the Social Services Board has requested that the definition for group care home be modified to include six or £ewer abused Or neglected children or children in need of care and a~sistance from the Social Services Department. Mr. Applegate returned to the meetinq. Discussion, questions and comments ensued relative to the current ordinance as it pertained to classifications of any number of handicapped or disabled adults and/or children residing in a supervised home as a permitted use in Agricultural, Residential and Commercial zoning districts; State law requirements; proposed modifications as recommended by the Planning Co~uuissiOn; definition of the terminology "abused or neglected children or children in need of care and service by the Social Services Board"; the districts in which group home, group care facility and halfway house uses are permitted by the current Zoning Ordinance as compared to same in the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment; etc. Mr. Daniel requested and the Board generally agreed that a written statement/policy from the Community Services and Social S~rvices Boards be provided relative to an implementation policy to assure the equitable distribution of such facilities County-wide for which the Social Services Department has jurisdiction. 1.D. SEPTIC SYSTEM ORDINANCE Dr. William Nelson, Director of the Mealth Department, presented a summary of and answered question~ relative to the proposed septic system ordinance/policy and addressed amendments to the Count~ Code regarding minimum lot size and construction standards for conventional septic system~ and a policy concerning creation of assessment and development districts and required hookup to public wastewater system~. Discussion, questions and comments ensued on pertinent issues relative to a comparison of the proposals recommended by the Board of Supervisors as originated at the Charlottesville Accord meeting, the Planning Commission's recommended proposal and staff's reeouunendations, addressing lot sizes served by septic systems; depth to seasonal table; installation depths (ranging from 18" and 24" minimums to 60" and 96" maximums); 89-594 prohibited; disposal units; contractor qualifications~ maintenance requirements (repairs and pumpinq); prohibited materials; prohibited u~; effective date for lot size, standards, etc.; recordkeaping; easements; policy of creation estimated costs of owning a septic sT~t~m a~ Compared to utilizing public utilities; possible funding sources; etc. Mr. Ramsay indioated June 28, 1989, at 9:00 a.m., had been ~cheduled and advertised for a public hearing to consider ~n ordinance to amend ~he ~ount¥ code relating to the septic system policy/oTdinance and stated ~taff reeo~n~ed that Option 3 be pursued. Mr. Daniel requested further informatlen relative to open-ended recordation of minimum lot sizes and a list of 3,000-gallon Mr. Mayas e~ated he preferred to see the utilization of public public hearing date set for consideration of the matter should Mr. Sullivan stated he felt it incumbent upon individual homeowner~ to maintain/repair/pump their septic systems if that County ~honld not be responsible, for er bear the burden of 1.E. BP~AK It wa~ generally agreed tO recess for fifteen minutes. 1.F. FCON0~IC DZV~LOP~E~T MARKETING PROGRAM Nm. Gary MeLaren prsaente~ an overview Of the economic development marketing program for Ch~terfiel~ County, reviewing the past and current status and the fnture goals end explained ssvsral special promotional event~ that the depart- ment had conducted in its efforts to promote/attract industrial development and stated he felt thos~ efforts were very well received; expressed cones/ns ~Or %he need to provide morel obligation bonds for attracting new industry and submitted a chronology Of ~vents r~latlve to attracting the Japanese firm of Mar~chan~ Inc. to the County; stressed %he importance of continuing to pursue the European economic market to assist with broadening the County's commercial ta~ base; noted that consideration be given to up~ating the audio/visual tape, '~Eirst Choice, Chesterfield" by translating it into G~rman and Japanese or c~eating a slide presentation format which would'be easier and les~ expensive to ~pdate in the future; and ~tated he f~lt th~ p~t year's endeavors had been very successful and beneficial to the COUnty. Mr. Appleqate ~etu~ned to the meeting. The Board eo~mended Mr, McLaren for an ezeell~nt presentation; inquired as to the estimated costs for translating the existing audio/visual tape inte German and Japanese and th~ er~atio~ of a elide presentation; suggested staff originate a request to 89-595 the Board relative to the cost factors, as well as other aspects of data, for the conversion of the existing tape and/or creating a slide format presentation for pursuit of economic development prospects; and it was generally agreed that County Administrator be directed to formally convey to Dr. Asche the County's desires to meet with two Chambers of Commerce in Germany for discussions with potential economic development prospects. It was generally agreed to recess for two minutes. 1.G. CHESAPEAKE BAY PRESERVATION ACT Mr. Ramsey introduced MS. Belch S. M, Blaekwood, Chesterfield County's regional representative on the Cheeapeake Bay Local Assistance ~oard, and Mr. Stun satderson, Deputy Executive Director of the Chesapeake Pay Local Assistance Board, who were present to present an overview of the proposed Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance Board (CBLAB) criteria and regulations governing development in designated "tidewater" localities to implement the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, of which Chesterfield would be one of the affected localities. Discussion, questions and comments ensued relative to a comparison of the proposed CBLAB regulations with the County's current development review operations; said regulations being applicable only to specific sensitive areas in the County to be deeignated as "recourse preservation areae"; dollar costs to the County government and procedures/timeframes through which the County must function to implement the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Program; costs for contracting out wetlands and geology services to consultants as well as additional County staff; undetermined costs for possible legal aesietance; ets. It was generally agreed more information was needed relative to the proposed criteria/regulations ae proposed through the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act and ~s. Blackwcod and Mr, Balderson stated they would transmit any pertinent information to the Board as soon as possible. The Board recessed at 5:~0 for dinner. to travel to the Sunset Cafe Reconvening: 4. I~O/OCATIUN Mr. Applegate introduced Chief Robert L. Eanes, Jr.~ who gave the invocation. 5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCETOT~FLAG OF -r~UNITED STATES OF Brigadier General George C. Ogden, Jr. of the Bellwood Defense General Supply Center lead the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America. 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board approved the minutes of May 24, 1989, as submitted. g9-596 Mr. Ramsay reported that the County has been seleuted as the recipient of five 1989 National. Association of Counties (NACO) Achievement Award Certificates for Infectious Disease Con=tel Program, Civil War Site Preservation, D~bzi~ Landfill Study, Special 9rejects Coordination ~orm and Debt Management Program, which will be pre,anted at th% conference in Cincinnati, Ohio in July, 19~9. Mr. william ~owell, Director of General ~ervises, reported on the debris removal which resulted from severe thund~rstor~ in the County on May ~th and 6th and oou~ended those individuals involved in the cleanup efforts, particularly Mr. ~ddie ~ing of the Parks a~d Recreatio~ Department, who ~erved a~ the Field Supervisor. Mrs. Pauline ~itchell, ~ews and Information Director, reported that Mr. Applegate, ~r. ~amsey and she accompanied executives and other staff from t_he Richmond Times Dispatch and Richmond Newaleader on a tour of the County on June 6th, which included the visiting of established neighborhoods, residential and/or cD~m%ercial development projects, varieu~ road networks, eke., and stated sb~ ~elt the ~vent was very Mr. Sullivan stated he attended the Richmond Regional Planning District Cc~lmis~fnn meeting at which Mr. ~arry ~. Daniel, Dale District Supervisor, wes elected Chairman o~ that organization and he and Mr. Currin met with the School Board Liaison ¢o~m~it~ee a~ which is~ue~ r~la~iv~ ~o th~ acquisition u~ property were discussed. Appomattox ~asin Industrial D~velo~mnt Cozpuratlon (A~IDCO) delegations that represent the various localities' mem~er~hip~ Development Corporation (ABIDCO}; the Metropolitan Planning District co--lesion a~ well ~ the Crater Planning Chair~n, respectively, for both organizations; an~ the presented certain information, copies cf which were included in treated by the Board, A~inistration and ~taff earlier in the District Co~is~ion meetin~ it was formally agreed to exercise a l~ase fo~ the new ~DC building, which louation i~ in the vitinity of ~he 1-64/I-95/L~burnum Avenue area and was chosen for its accessibility for all m~mbpr$; at=ended a c~ittee tion (~0~ relative to me~ership, which reco~endations from largest jurisdictions; and attended the Capital aeg~on Airport Co~ission meeting at ~hich it wns indicated cargo traffic continues to increase whilu ~assengsr traffic ccntlnues to 89-597 decline due to the overall national economic situation as well as the Eastern Airlines strike. Mr, Applegate reported the he, Governor Baliles, Mr. Ramsey and County staff attended the June 9, 1989, grand opening ceremony of AGI (~lectronics), Ltd., in the Ruffin Mill Road area. Mr. Daniel noted that this industry was one of those that announced a year ago its intention to locate in Chesterfield County and was a direct result of the County's lobbying efforts during its European economic development marketing trip. 9. REQUESTS TO POSTPON~ ACTION~ ~GEWC¥ DDI?ION$ OR Ct~NGES IN TZU~ ORDER OF PRESENTATION On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board moved Item 2., Executive Se$$10n to Discuss the Condition, Acquisi- tion or Use of Real Property for Public PurpOSes or the Dis- position of Publicly Held Property Pursuant to Section 2.1-344 (a) (2) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, to the end of the agenda; deleted the names of Mr. and Mrs. William E. Wright and Mr. and Mrs. Bill Ratliff from Item 14.E.2., Request to Aid Developer in Aoguirinq Water Line Easements Along Riverway Road; added Item 14.C.5., Nomination - Chesterfield/Colonial Heights Social Services Board; added Item 14.E.5., Authoriza- tion for the County Administrator to ~xecute a License Agree- ment with Maruchan, Inc.; and adopted the agenda, as amended. Vote: Unanimous 10. RESOLUTIONS ~ SPECIAL ~COGNITI~S 10.A. GENERAL GEORGE C. OGDEN, JR., BELLWOOD DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLY CENTER On motion of the Board, the following re~olution was adopted: W~EP~EAS, Brigadier General George C. Ogden permitted key people in his safety division staff to participate in Chester- field County's Local Emergency Planning Committee; and WH~Pd3AS, General Ogden assisted Chesterfield County by providing an ambulance and trained medical personnel to provide emerqenoy medical services to the citizens in the immediate community surrounding the Defense General Supply Center; and WH~AS, General Ogden supported the long standing mutual aid agreement between the Defense General Supply Center Fire Department and the Chesterfield County Fire Department; and WHEREAS, General Ogden encouraged and suppsrtsd excellent military-civilian relationships between the Defense General Supply Center and the civilian community; and WHE~A$, General Ogden has proven %o be a solid and involved citizen of Chesterfield County. NOW, THRP~FOR~ ES IT R~DLV~D, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes Brigadier General George C. Ogden, Jr. and expresses its appreciation and that of the citizens of Chesterfield County for his support and assistance during his assignment to the Defense General Supply Center and wishes him well on his retirement. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Applegate presented General Ogden with the executed resolution, wished him well on his retirement and recognized hie mother, wife and MS. Laura Willard who were present. 89-598 Defense Gen~raI ~upply Center, for the long-standing, excellent military-civilian relationship in the community and presented th~ Board with ~ plaque in appreciation for the outetanding cooperation in program~ of mutual benefit to both the Defense General Supply Center an~ Chesterfield County and for the spirit of partnership engendered in furthering Pederal/County relationships. MARIA F. KEEITS!$, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY On motion cf the Beard, the following r~solution w~ adopted: W~EREAS, Mrs. Maria F. Kerit~is ~erved as a School Board member representing Clover ~ill Dietrio% from January 1, 1982 to June 30, 1989; and W~ER~AS, Mrs. Heritsis~ leadership and ability were recognized and ~he w~ elected a~d served es Chairman and Vice Chairman of the School ~oard and h~a~od ~p many othe~ committees working on issue~ of major importance to the School System, its citizens and its children; and WHeReAS, Mrs. Kerits±s took a ~ealistie and effective approach to ~asic educational considerations while continuing tO expand and further develop the curriculu~ and WHEREAS, During M~$. ~eri~sis' tenure, eight school~ were built, including seven el~mentar~ echeole, one high school, inq schools an well a~ the passaqs of the 1988 School Bond Referendum which will provide two additions, seven new schools--four being elementary schools, one being a middle school and two being high sehool~: and eighteen energy con- servation/air conditioning projects; and W~EREAS, D~ring the Sy~t~'s rapid growth, the schools have main/ain~ a reputation for sxc~llenee and community ~tud~t~ have exhibited continued improvements and high NOW, TMEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County ~oard of Supervisors here~y expreseas its appreciation and gratitude for the dedicated efforts of Mrs. Maria F. Eeriteie while representing clover Hill District on the Chesterfield County School Board with credit and distinction. A/qD, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, ~hat a plaque inscribed as £ollow~ he presented to Mrs. Kerltsis: MARIA F. EEEITSIE IN APPRECIATION FOR MORE THkN 8EVEN YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE TO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY CLOV~R MILL ~AGiSTERIAL DISTRICT Nr. Applegate stated the executed re,elation will he presented by the Chairman at a reception planned for June 27, 1989 in Nfs. Keritsi~' honor. 1]. ~%I~IN~,S OF CITIZENS ON ~NS~UL~D 14A~TERS O~ ~ There were ~o hea~ings of citizens on unscheduled matters or claims. 89-599 12. DEFEIL'~ED I~F2~ 12.A. APPOINTMENTS 12.A.1. SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Hayes, the Board suspended the rules to simultaneously nominate/appoint Mr. C. F. Currin, Jr. to serve on the Chesterfield/Colonial Heights Social Services Board, to fulfill the remainder of the term of Mr. M. S. Sullivan who resigned in order to allow other Board members to participate on the Board. Vote: Unanimous On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Hayes, the Board simultaneously nominated/appointed Mr. C. F. Currin, Jr. to eerve on the Chesterfield/Colonial Heights Social Services Board, to fulfill the remainder of the term of Mr. M. B. Sullivan who reeigned in order to allow other Board members to participate on the Board, whose term is effective July 1, 1989 and will axpira June 30, 1992. Vote: Unanimous 12.A.2. GREAT=R HICEMQ~D TPJaNSIT COMPANY - BOARD OF DIRECTORS On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Cuttle, the Board nominated the following persons to serve on the Board of Directors of the Greater Ricbnuond Transit Company, whose formal appointment will be made on June 28, 1989: Mr. Daniel K. Smith, Controller, Mr. David W. Matthews, General Manager, Seal-Tech Mr. Harry I. Schutte, Jr., retired Vice President, Sovran Bank Mr. Nelson Bennett, President, ~ennett Ford Vote: Unanimous 12.A.3. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Hayes, the Board appointed Mr. James A. Spencer, representing the Dale Magisterial District, and Mr. John Waddill, representing the Bermuda Magisterial District, to serve en the Industrial Development Authority, whose terms are effective July 1, 1989 and expire June 30, 1993. Vote: Unanimous 12.B. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANC~ TO ANEND THE CODE OF TEE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 21.1-44, 21.1-47,. 21.1-94~ 21,1-97~ 21.1-102~ 21.1-105, 21.1-110.,. 21.1-113, 21.1-152, 21.1-155, AND 21.1-281 RELATING TO GROUP HOMES, GROUP CARE FACILITIES AND HALFWAY HOUSES Mr. Jacobson stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to conmider an ordinance to amend the Code cf the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as a~ended, relating to group homes, group care facilities and halfway houses. He briefly smmmarized the proposed ordinance as recommended by the Planninq Commission and explained the modifications. Ms. Elsie Elmore, Chairman of the Chesterfield/Colonial Heiqhts Social Services Board, briefly summarized the responsibilities 89-600 definition for Group Care Rome b~ modified to include six er fewer ohiidrsn described as "abused and neglected children~ or children in need of ~ar~ and assistance from the Social Services Department" and that such use be permitted by right rather than by application for Conditional Use permit. Mr. Mike dearie, Executive Direstor cf the Virqinia Association enacted Federal Fair Housing Act on the proposed ordinance, cited restrictions which he felt may be discriminatory and stated the Virginia Association of ~omes for Adults request that the Board reconsider the proposed ordinanc~ amendments as they appear to hs in eenf!ict with the Federal Fair Hounin~ Mr. Jim Hedges, operator of a County Adult Moms, voiced concerns relative to "adult" homes ~ein~ categorized the same as "~oup" hom~s, explained the dlfferentiation in the terminology of the two types of tomes, and requested modification· of the proposed ordinance by deletion of th~ category of "adult" homes. Ns. Barbara Hedges stated adult hemes are different from group homes/group care facilities in that adult hom~s afc licensed by the ~a~e Department of Social Services and qroup homes/group care facilities are licensed by th~ State Department of Mental aeal~h and Mental Retardation and p~rfnrm differen~ functions for different type~ of peopl~ and stated she saw ne need for requiring an application for a conditional use permit to Discussion, question~ an~ comments ensued concerning the cost ~actor relative to permitted uses varau~ Conditional U~e permits; whether or not it would be in the best interest cf those individuals livinq in adult home~ for the governing body to have a mechanism whereby the facility may be monitored to conflicted with th~ ~edezal Fair Educing Act; discussion nE permits to operate being perceived as the conditions of ~oning un~e~ which a CondltiQnal Usa ps,mit is approved; std. When asked, Mr. Micas suggested, in considering the Social be mere acceptable a~d achieve the dec,red result if ths last Elmore further explained the ~efiniticn of "children in need of services" to be those children who have not broken the law that would be applieabl~ to an adult hut those who are runaways or seem to b~ out of control. would be in the best interest of County citizens for the governing body to retain a mech~nlsm whereby Bush facilities may be monitored ~o ensure quality service via the us~ of Conditional Use permits; definition of =he terminology "adult" home being categorized as a "group" home; approval of the proposed ordinance to include the modifieatlon ~$ s~ggested ~y the County Attorney; concern that such facilities not be clustered and that they be ~quitably distributed throughout the County: the process by which nursing/retirement homes are p~rmitted; ~tc. Mr. Hedges further explained the ~ifferences in the ds£inition, eperetion, etc., of nursing~ r~ti~ement and/or adult hom~ facilities; etc. Mr. Hayes stated that the Board, as an appointed authority, doing so if it were not to utilize the Conditional Uae factor. 89-601 On motion o£ Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board resolved fo adopt the following ordinances: A~ O~DII~ANCE TO AMEND 'r~ CODE OF 'r~ OF C~S~E~IE~, 1978, AS ~ED, ~y ~ ~CTING SECTI~S 21-3~ 21-77.16, 21-~7.18, 21-109, 21-111, 21-148, 21-153, 21-155, 21-196 ~ ~TING ~ G~ H~S~ G~ ~ FACILITIES ~Y HOUSES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended to read as follows: Sec. 21-3. Definitions. o o o ~roup.~ome. An adult and child caring facility, designed to provide resident services to individuals 'who are physically handicapped, mentally ill, mentally retarded or developmentally disabled, in which no more than six such individuals reside with one or more resident counselors or other staff persons. For the purposes of this chapter, a group home shall be considered a dwelling. Group care facility. An adult and child earing institution or facility, other than a group home, halfway house or hospital, designed to provide resident services to individuals requiring rehabilitation or personal services because they are physically handicapped, mentally ill, mentally retarded, developmentally disabled, aged, infirm, chronically ill, incurably afflicted or children separated from their parents or guardian. c O o Halfway house. An adult and child caring institution or facility established, operated or utilized by the Virginia Department of Corrections or the Federal Bureau of Prisons for the temporary care of adults on probation or parole or for the temporary training, confinement or detention of children. o o o ~ospital. An institution providing primary health services and medical or surgical care to persons, primarily inpatients, suffering from illness, disease, injury, deformity and other abnormal physical or mental conditiens and including as an integral part of the institution, related facilities such as laboratories, outpatient facilities or training facilities. o o o Article III.A. R-88. Residential District. See. 21-77.16. Permitted uses--By right. The following uses shall be permitted by right in the E-88 District: Group homes. o o o Sec. 21-77.18. Same--Conditional uses. The following uses may be allowed by conditional subject to the provisions of Section 21-34: 89-602 (o) Group care facilities. ooo Article X. R-TH Residential - Townhouse District See. 21-]09~ Permitted uses--By right. The following uses shall be permitted by right in the R-TE District: (a) Townhouses in accordance with Division 11.1. (b) Gromp homes. ooo Sec. 21-111. Same--ConditionaL uses. The follawin~ usa~ ma~ be allowed as Conditional Uses in the R-TE Dis~rlct subject to the provisions of Sea,ion lc) Gromp care facilities. Article XIV. 0 Office easiness District. Sec. 2I-I4~. Permitted within any 0 District, no ~uildinq, structure~ or shall be used, arranged, or designed to b~ used iD any part except ~or cna (1} or more o~ the ~ollowin~ (b) Q~oap care facilities. Article XV. B-1Convsni~nce Busine~ District. Eec. 2~-195. Permitted use~--By right. Wi~in any ~-1 District, no building, ~ructure, or premises shall be used or arranged cz designed to be used in any part except for one or more of th~ following uses~ subject to the provisions of Division (69) Group care facilities. Sec. 21-15~. Sago--Conditional The following mses may b~ allowe~ by conditional the B-1 Dietrich, ~ub~ct to tko provisions of section 21-34: (h) Halfway house. 89-603 Article XXII. R-MF Residential - Multifamily District. Sec. 21-196. Permitted uses--By riq~. The following uses shall be permitted by right in the R-MF District: (a) Multiple-family dwellings in accordance with Division 11.1. (b) Group homes. ooo Sec. 21-198. Sa~e--Conditional uses The following uses may be allowed as conditional uses in the R-MF Districts subject to the provisions Of S~¢tion 21-~4: (c) Group care facilities. AN ORDINANCETOAMENDTHECOD~ OF 'r~COUNTYOF CHEOTEP~IELD 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTTNG ~ECTTONS 21.1-44, 21.1-47, 21.1-94, 21.1-97, 21.1-102, 21.1-105, 21.1-110, 21.1-113, 21.1-152, 21.1-155 AND RELATING TO GROUP HOM~$, GROU~ CAR~ FACILITIES AND ~%LFWA¥ ~OUSES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is a/nended to read as follows: o o o ARTICLE 3. DISTRICTS. ooo DIVISION 4. R-85 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. 0oo Sec. 21.1-44. Permitted uses--By right. The following uses shall be permitted by right in the R-S8 District: (f) Group homes. o o o o o o Sec. 21.1-47. Conditional Uses. The following us~ may be allowed by subject to the provisions of Section 21.1-9: o o o (n) Group care facilities. o o o Conditional Use, 89-604 DIVISION 11. R-T~ Pd~SIDEN~IAL-TOWNHOUSE DISTRICT. O 00 Sec. 21.1-94. Permitted Uses--By right. The following u~%s shall be permitted by right in the R-TH District: {a) Townhouses. (b) Group homes. Sec. 21.1-97. Condi=ional U~es. The following u~es may be, allowed as COnditiunul Uses in the R-TH District, subject to ~h~ provisions Of Se=tlon 2~.1-9: (d) Group care facilities. O O o DIVISION 12, R-5~F M~TI-~A~ILy RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. ~o. 21.1-102. Permitted Us~s--B¥ ~i~ht. The following uses shall be permitted by right in the R-MP District: (a) Multiple-family (b) Group homes. Sec. 21.1~105. Conditional Uses. The following uses ~ay be allowed as Conditional Uses in the R-MF District, subject to the provisions of section 21.1-9. QOQ (d) Group care facilities. QQQ DIVISION 13. ~L~-i MA~/F~CTU~D OR MOBIL~ ~O~= ~AEK ~ISTRICT. O 0 0 Sec. 21.1-~10. Permitted Uses--~ Th~ following uses shall b9 permi=ted by right in the ~k~-i Dis~rict: (a) Manufactured or mobile home parks. (b) Group homes. see. 21.1-113. Conditional Uses. The following u~es may be allowed as Conditional Uses in thc MH-1 District, subject to the provisions of Section ~1.1-9: Group ca~e facilities. 89-605 ooo DIVISION 15. A AGRICULTU~L DISTRICT. ooo Sss. 21.1-127. Conditional Uses. The following uses may be allowed by Conditional Use, subjs¢~ ~o the provision of Section 21.1-9: (g) Any permitted or Conditional Us~ allewed in the C-~ or I-3 Districts other than.halfway ooo DIVISION 19. C-2 NEIG~BO~00D BUSINESS DISTRICT. o o o Sec. 21.1-152. Permitted Uses--By Right. Within any C-2 District, no buildings, structures or premise~ shall be used or arranged or designed to be used except for one or more of the following uses: o o o (kk) Rest, nursing and convalescent homes and ether group care facilities. o o o Sec. 21.1-155. Conditional Uses. The following uses may be allowed by Conditional Use in the C-2 District subject to the provisions of Section 21.1-9: O O O (g) Halfway houses. o o o ARTICLE 10. DEFINITIONS Sec. 21.1-281. Definitions. For the purposes of this Chapter~ the following words and phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them by this Section: e o o Group home. An adult and child carfnq facility, designed to provide resident services to individuals who are physically handicapped, mentally ill, mentally retarded Or developmentally disabled, in which no more than six such individuals reside with one e~ more resident counselors or other staff persons. For the purposes of this chapter, a group home shall be considered a dwelling. ~rou~_ ~are facility. ~n adult and child oaring institution or facility, other than a group home, halfway house or hospital, designed to provide resident services to individuals requiring rehabilitation or personal services because they are physically handicapped, men~ally ill, mentally retarded, developmentally disabled, aged, infirm, chronically ill, incurably afflicted or children Separated from their parents or guardian. 89-606 Halfway house. An adult and child ea~ing institution or facility established, operated or utilized by the Virqinia ~epartment of Corr~ction~ or the ~ederal ~ureau cf P:i~ons for the temporary care of adults on probation or parole o~ for the temporary training, oQnflnement or detention of children. o e o There was further discussion relative to the proposed ordinance, aa g~b~itted, not addressing the n~d~ O~ the Social Services ~oard's request; clarification as to th~ definition o~ the terminolog~ "abused and n~glected ~hildren or children in need of ears and asslstan~e from tho Social Services Department"~ etc. M~. Jean S~i~h, Director of the Doclal Services D~part~e~t, elari£i~d the de~initlons of "abused and neglected children" &~ compared to "children in n~ed of care and assistance". Mr. AppLegate suggested the notion be a~cDde~ tO include eategorie~ for "abused and neglected children~' for six or ~ewer children to b~ permitted by right in residential districts =~ well as ~'children in mead ~f $~rvices" for ~ix or f~w~r children tO be p~z~itt~d by Cendigionat Use in all dlstric~s. On motion cf Mr~ Daniel, seconded by ~r. ~ays~, ~he following ordinances were adopaed: ~1-10~, 21-111, 21-148, ~1-153, 21-155~ ~-1~5 ~ Zl-~9~ ~ ~OUSE~ B~ TT ORDAIneD by the Board of ~upervlsor~ of Chesterfield County: (1) That the Code of the Count~__9~.Qheeterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended to read as o o o Gruu~. home. An adult and child caring facility, designed tc provide resident ~ervice~ to individual~ who are physically handicapped, mentally ill, mentally retarded, devel0pmentall~ di~abt~d or abused or neglected children, in which no more than si~ such individuals reside with one er m0r~ resident counsulor~ or other stai£ persone. For the purposes of thi~ chapter, a group hom~ shall be considered a dwelling. Grcu care ~acilit . An adult and child carin~ institution or facility, other than a group home, halfway house or hospital, designed to provide re=ident ~ervieas to individuals requiring rehabilitation or personal services because they are physically handicacped, mentally ill, mentally retarded, developmentally disabled, aged, infirm, chronically ill, incurably afflicted, children in need of services or children separated from choir parent~ or guardian. ~al£w~y house. ~n adult and child caring instieution or f~cility established, operated ~r utilized by the Virginia Department cf Corrections or the Federal Bureau o{ Prisons for the temporary care of adults on probation 0~ parole or for the temporary training, confinement er detention of children. ooc Hospital. An institution providing primary health service~ and medical or surgical care to psrsons, primarily inpatients, suffering from illust,, disease, injury, deformity and other abnormal physical or mental conditions and including as an integral part of the institution, related facilities such as laboratories, outpatient facilities or training facilities. ooo Article III.A. R-88. ~esidenbial District. See. 21-77.16. ~ermitted uses--By right. The following uses shall be permitted by right in the R-88 District: (f) Group homes. ooo ~ec. 21-77.18. Same--Conditional uses. The following uses may be allowed by conditional use subject to the provi~ion~ of Section 21-34: ooo (o) Group care facilities. ooo Article X. R-T~ Residential - ~o%rnhouse District Sec, 21-109. Permitted uses--By right, · he following uses shall be permitted by right in the R-TH Di~tric~: (a) Townhouses in accordance with Divisien 11.1. (b) Group homes. o o o Sec. 21-111. Same--Conditional uses. The following uses may be allowed as Conditional Uses in the R-TB District subjeot to the provisions of Section o o o (c) Group care facilities. o o o Article XIV. O Office Business District. o o o Sec. 21-148. Permitted uses--By risht. Within any 0 District, no building, structures or premises shall be used, arranged, or designed to be used in any part except for one (1) or more of the following uses: 0 o o {b) Group care facilities. 89-608 oo0 Article ~. B-1 Convenience Business District. Sec. 21-153. Permit=ed uses--B~ right. Within any B~I District, no h~ilding, ztrustbre, or premises shall be used or arranged or desi~ne~ =o be used in any part except for one or more of the followin~ uses, subject to the provisions of Divi~ion (69; Group care facilities. ~ec. ~1-155. S~e--Cond~tiQnal uses. The following uses may be allowed by oo:ditional use th~ B-1 District, subjec% to the provisions of section 21-34 {h) ~al fway house. Article ~II. ~-MF Residential - Multif~ily District. Sec. 21-196. Permi~%ed uses--By right, The following uses shall be pe~itte~ by right in =he District: (a) ~ultiple-f~ily dwellings in accordance with Division 11.1. (b) Group hom~s. S~c. 21-198. 9~e--Conditlonal =he R-~F DistriCtS subject %o the provision~ of Section ~1-34~ o o o (c) Group care facilities. o o o ~1.1-44, ~t.~-47, 21.t-94, 21.1-~7, 21.1-182, 21.1--185, 21.1-118, 21.1-113, 21.1-152, ~1.1-15~ ~ County~ (i) That ~h~ Code o~ the County of Chesterfield, 197S, 89-609 DIVISION 4. R-88 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. o o o Sec. 21.1-44. Permitted uses--By right. The following uses shall be permitted by right in the R-88 District: (f) Group homes, o o o 00 o See. 21.1-47. Conditional Uses. The following use~ may be allowed by Conditional subject to the previ~iens of S~ction 21.1-9: o o o (n) Group care facilities. o o o DIVISION 11. R-TH RESIDENTIAL-TOWNEOUSB DISTRICT. o00 Sec. 21.1-94. Permitted Uses--By right. The following uses shall be p~rmitted by right in the R-TH District: (a) Towr~houses. (b) Group homes. Sec. 21.1-97. Conditional Uses. The following uses may be allowed as Conditional Uses in the R-TH District, subject to the provisions Of Section 21.1-9= (d) Group care facilities. DIVISION 12. R-MF MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. o o o Sec. 21.1-102. Permit=ed Uses--By Right. The following uses shall be permitted by right in th~ R-MF District: (a) Multiple-family dwellings. (b) Group homes. o o o Sec, 21.1-105, Conditional Usss. The following uses may be allowed as Conditional Uses in the R-MF District, subject to the provisions of Section 21.1-9. o o e 89-610 (d) Group care facilities. o o o DIVISION 13. MH-1 MANUFACTURED OR MORIL~ ~0ME PARK DISTRICT. Sec. 21.1-110. Permitted Uses--By Right. The followinq uses shall be permitted by right in District: (a) Manufactured or mobile home parks. (b) Group home~. Sec. 21.1-113. Conditional Uses. The followimg uses may be allowe~ as Condi~icnal the ME-1 District~ subject to the provisions of S~ction 21.1-9: Group care facilities. DIVISION 15. A AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT. Sec. 21.1-127. Conditlo~a% Uses. The following uses may be allowed by Conditional Use, subject tc the provision cf Section ooo (g] Any permitted or Conditional Use allowed in the C-5 or IL3 Districts other than halfway houses. DIVISION 19. C-2 NEIGHBO~OOD BUSINESS DISTRICT. Sec. 21.1-152. Permitted Uses--By Riqht.~ Within any C-2 District, no buildings, structures or pr~mises ~hall be used or a=ranged or designed to be used :xcept for one or more cf ~he following uses: (kk) Rest, nursing and convalescent homes and other group care facilities. S~e, 21.1-155. Conditional Uses. The following uses may bs allowed by Conditional Uss in the C-2 District m%lb~eet to the previsions of Section 21.1-9: O o o 89-611 ARTICLE 10. DEFINITIONS Sec. 21.1-281. Definitions. For the purpoees of this Chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them by this Section: coo ~ home. An adult and child caring facility, designed to provide resident services to individuals who are physically handicapped, mentally ill, mentally retarded, developmentally disabled or abused or neglected children, in which no more than six such individuals reside with one or more resident counselors or other staff persons. For the purposes of this chapter, a group home shall be considered a dwelling. ~rou~are facility. An adult and child caring institution or facility, other than a group home, halfway house or hospital, designed to provide resident services to individuals requiring rehabilitation or personal services because they are physically handicapped, mentally ill, mentally retarded, developmentally disabled, aged, infirm, chronically ill, incurably afflicted, children in need of services or children separated from their parents or guardian. Halfway house. An adult and child carinq inetitution or facility established, operated or utilized by the Virginia Department of Corrections or the Federal Bureau of Prisons for the temporary care of adults On probation or parole or for the temporary training, confinement or detention of children. o o o Vote: Unanimous 12.C. 89SN0199 - SOUTBGATE ASSOCIATES, CLOVER EILL DISTRTCT 89SN0199 In Clover Bill Magisterial District, SOUTHGATE ASSOCIATES requested amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development (Case 85S076) relative to the maximum allowable height and gross floor area of buildings in an 0~£ioe BusineSs (0) District. This requeet lice on a 56.4 acre parcel fronting approximately 200 feet on the south line of Midlothian Turnpike and fronting approximately 2,000 feet on the west line of Powhite Parkway~ and located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of these roads; also f~onting approximately 960 feet on the east line of North Arch Road, approximately 150 feet south-of Knightebridge Road. Tax Map 28-1 (1) Parcels 9 and 23 and Part of Parcel 8 (Sheet 8). Mr. Jacobsen presented a brief summary of Case 895N0199 explaining that the current request is for amendment of Case 85S076 relative to maximum allowable height of buildings on a portion of the property south of Arboretum Parkway and to increase the gross square footage of the overall development. He stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request; however, at its May 24, 19S9 meeting the Board deferred consideration of Case 89SN0199 to the June 14, 1989 meeting. Mr. Applegate stated at its previous meeting the Board closed th~ public hearing; however, since Mr. Maye$ was not present and a tie vote appeared imminent, he felt it would be appropriate to reopen the public hearing to allow public 89-612 represent the request. They stunmarized the applicant's request for an amendment to permit two (2) three (3) story buildings adjacent to single family r~ideDces in $Cettingham Subdivision A~boret~m f~om 771,000 ~quare feet to $71,000 square feet. They explained their opinions relative to the differences in neighborkocd opinion of tkose in favor/opposed to the proposed He stated he fait it was a quality project which served as a deterrent to crime/vandalism in the neighborhood, enhanced subject property. favor of three (3) story buildings but against the unknc%~n~ and quuutionud ii thc Board could predict the potential traffic impact of thlu project an~ protect the neiqhborhoo~ against any negative impacts. He further requested the= if the request were to be approved, that the adjacent property owuer~ be notified of any site plan r~viewe so they could attend the meetings. amendment, voiced concerns relative to th~e~ (3) story buildings abutting a single family residential neighborhood and increased ~raffic, and asked that the request be denied. anticipated traffic impact and ~tated the applicants have Etated the %raffi~ as originally anticipated i~ considerably hearinq wad McCracken ~ated ~he amount of traffic generated by the actual th= ~istribution of traffic was different than that originally p~0jected specifically and mor~ traiflc was using Arch Road and th~ site. ~ ~ta%ed the Board recently a~o~ted a new Zoning buildings adjacent to residential ~velOpm~nts; that he was still concerned wi~ making an exception to the newly adopted ~oninq Ordinance but ~ince tke applicant was caught in middl~ o~ the ordinance amendment process he could support the 100 foot setback with an increased building h~igh% bBt Do= the t00,OQO square foot increase. 89-613 Mr. Daniel suggested that the Board defer consideration of approval of the 100,000 square foot increase in floor space until such time as the traffic study wa~ available. Mr. Mayes referenced the recent decision of the Supreme Court relative to denial of the highest and best use of the land based on a zoning decision~ expressed concerne relative to potential litigation if an appropriate land use decision were improperly rendered, and stated he was not convinced by the testimony that the request should be denied. Mr. Daniel stated he felt the opposition was based on consideration for health, safety and wel£are issues. Mr. Sullivan stated he did not support the 200' setback requirement; felt there was high-quality at the Arboret~m~ that there was a great deal of merit in having four buildings versus six buildings adjacent to the neighborhood; and, since at least 50% of the neighborhood supported the request and information relative to the the traffic impact suggests the impact will be minimal, he would vote in support of the request. ~e further stated he felt the proposed use was appropriate, the project would be an asset to the County's tax base and that such types of development needed to be encouraged. Mr. Currin concurred. Mr. Applegate indicated his relustance to approve the request; however, due to the cor~raents of other Board member, it was on motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, resolved to approve an amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development (Case 85S076) to increase the maximum allowable building height to two (2) three (3) ~tory buildings adjacent to single family residences in Scottingham Subdivision, subject to the following conditions: 1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre- pared by Roy Ashley Associates, Inc., submitted to the Planning Department on February 10, 1989, the Textual Statement submitted with the application, and the letter dated April 6, 1989, shall be considered the Master Plan. (P) (NOTE; This condition supersedes Condition 22 of Case 85S076, relative to building heights~ and Condition 23, relative to uses, for that portion of the Arboretum lying south of Arboretum Parkway.) 2. All buildings shall be set back a minimum of 100 feet from the southern property boundary. (P) (NOTES: a. Except as noted herein, all previously imposed conditions of zoning approval for Case 85S076 remain in effect. b. ~rior to obtaining a building permit, site plans must be submitted for review and approval. c. This development was approved prior to April 12, 1989, and is, therefore, subject to the requirements of Chapter 21 of the Zoning Ordinance, except as specified herein.) And further, the Board to approve an a~endment to Conditional Use Planned Development (Case 85S076) to increase the maximum square footage permitted in the Arboretum from 771,000 gross square feet to a maximum of 871,000 gross square feet, subject to the following conditions: 89-614 1. The maximum density of this development shall ~e 871,000 s~nare feet of office, but nor less than 771,000 squar~ feet of office. (NOT~: This condition supersedes Condition 12. f. of Zoning Case 85S076.) 2. The developer shall provid~ the Transportation Department with additional traffic studies upon completion of ~ech phase if requested. If these studies demonstrate that traffic generation rates and distributions solely by this development are materially different ~s determined by the Transportation Department from projections sat forth in the traffic study prepared by Wilbur Smith and dated May 28, t985, the Planninq Commission may reduce the permissible d~nsity fc the extent that acceptable levels of servlea are provided as determined by th~ T~ansport~- Vote: Unanimous It was generally agreed to recess for five minutes. ENTITLED "THOROUGHFAP~E PLAN" ~r. Mecrecken stated this date and lime had been advertised fox a public hearing to consider a plan for transportation improvements entitled, "Thoroughfare Plan'~ and presented a suf~ma~y of tho proposed ~lan which identified g~neral corridors, rights-of-way widths and functional for a highway n~twork which will accommodate %he COUnty's long term transportation needs and whluh included a recommendation for two major new ~rasways and over 200 mil~s of new arterial/collector roads. He ~tated the. Planning Com~isslon recommended approval of said Plan. He stated there recommendations from citizens and the Chester Village Plan Advisory Committee that the proposed extension of 5epkin~ Road south of Centralia Road be eliminated and/or reallgned sonn~et with the proposed abandoned railroad right-of-way arterial but staff doe~ Dot support this reuaa~endation because nOrth/south traffio will be concentrated in th~ Village of Che~ter and because public funds are unavailable for the construction of a road alon~ the railroad right-cf-way whereas d~velopers could be required to eonst~uc~ Hopkins Read ~xtend~d as proposed in the Thoroughfare Plan. Re stated that citizens connecting Route 10 at Point o~ Rocks Park to Allied Road. Nr. Applegate slated that due to a heavy calendar of public hearing i~sus~, the ~oard had se~ ~hie dste fur the public ~9-6~5 result had conflicted with many County graduation ceremonies; therefore, te permit further public input of those individuals who could not be present at this meeting, the Board would continue the public hearing to June 28, 1989, at 9:00 a.m. Mr. George Beadles, Mr. Steve Groman, Mr. Eddy Talbott~ Mr. Harold King, Mr. Lawrence Crawley, Mr. Lewis Bass, Mr. Kenneth Lyson, Mr. Cornelius Lively, Mr. William Day and MS. Mary Millhiser voiced support of the proposed Thoroughfare Plan. When asked, approximately forty persona stood to indicate their support ~or the Plan. Ms. Phyllis Bass, Mr. Wayne Virag, Mr. Phil Cunninqham, Mr. Miles Ward, Mr. Oliver Rudy, Mr. Tom Tannel, two individuals named David Phillips and Mr. Tom Miller expressed concerns relative to the impact of the proposed Plan on existing homes in areas that would be most affected by the proposed arterial/collector roads, the dedication of 90 foot rights-of-way that would be required cutting off most of their front yards, etc., and either voiced opposition to the proposed plan or requested that the Plan be deferred until other civic groups, citizens, and the Chester Village Plan Advisory Committee could provide input on the land use and other aspects of the Plan. Maps were displayed exhibiting the affected area and a position statement from Lester, Barbour and Associates were submitted to the Board for information and review. There was a brief discussion relative to the opposition for widening of 5opkins Road Extended; the definition of a "meandering road"; whether or not there were concernz with the proposed east/west route; etc. Mr. Daniel requested that color-coded maps be provide~ at the June 28, 1989 meeting, indicating the positions of the various groups. Mr. Mayes questioned if staff had been aware of the concerns of ~hose individualz regarding the potential the loss of their homes and requested tha~ area residents meet with Mr. McCracken. There being no one else to address the matter at this time, Mr. Applegate stated the public hearing would be continued to June 28, 1989, at 9:00 a.m. It was generally agreed to recess for five minutes. 13.E. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SIX YEAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND FY-90 SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVE- M~NT BUDGET Mr. MoCracken stated this date and time had been advertised as a joint Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT)/Chesterr field County public hearing to consider VDOT's FY90-95 Secondary Road Six Year Improvement Plan and FYP0 Secondary Road Improvement Budget. Mr. George Beadles addressed izsuez relative to the paving o~ Leda Road and stated he felt such action would be a waste of financial resources. Mr. Thomas Gannon, Mr. John Gregory, Mrs. Karen Gregory and Mr. Henry Patton, residentz of Leda Road, voiced support for including in the Six Year Road Improvement Plan the paving of Leda Read, expressed concern that it had previously been included in the plan but no action had been taken, and stated 89-616 they were unable to ascertain who the proper owners of ce!rain obtain their favor toward pavinq the road, etc. Mr. Jim Nealder, resident of Rhodes Lane, ~tated the families that live along Rhodes Lane are requesting that the road be tarred/gravEled, submitted 9et~tlens containing 43 signatures to Mr. Sullivan in support of ~uch action, and requested action be taken prior to 1991. Mr. Mccracken explained that necessary right-of-way had to be obtained prior to any action being taken toward paving Leda Road. Re 9tared the projuct had been included in the ~ix Year Plan several years ago hut tbs inability to acquire the necessary right-of-way dedication Caused it to be deleted. Mr. Tom Tannell voiced support for those Dersuns who want County rqads paved stating he felt there was no excuse for the C~uoty to have to ~ndure dirt/gravel roads and qu~stionp~ w~y there is insufficient mon~c$ for the necessary signalization at ~arious intersections within the County. Mr. Currln indicated his willingness to meet with Slate officials tudiscuss funding issues. dent~ with the i~e~tification and/or location of the unidenti- relative to cost estimates to complete the project. Mr. and ~ha% the requested project could be included in an "Incidental Roads" cateqory at a later tim~, if approved for in the roads. funding road improvement~, allocation of matching funds, the status of the Hopkins Road ~roject from Beulah Read to Inca Road and when the design work on ~aid project would begin, application for supplemental funding, prioritizing o~ projectm, con~ucted a public hearing on the FY-90 through F¥-95 Secondary WHEREAS~ the Board concnrs with the propo~d projects identi%ie~ in the pla~ and budge=. 14. R~W BUSINESS 14.A. COMPUTER DISASTER RECOVERY AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF RICHMOND On motion cf Mr. ~ayes, ~econd~d by Mr. Currin, the Boar~ authorized t~he county Administrator of Chesterfield County~ ~nd the City Manager of the City of Richmond to enter into a m~tual Computer Disaster Reuovery Agre~ent between the County's Information Symt~ms Technology Depar~ent and the City's Data Procssslag Department in aha even~ on~ of the parties suffer~ 89-617 computer failure rendering its computer system inoperable, such agreement to be subject to approval as to ~orm by the County Attorney. Vote: Unanimous 14.S. CONSIDER ADDITION TO MEMBERSHIP ON CHESTERFIELD/COLONIAL HEIGHTS SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD On motion of Mr. Sullivan, ~econded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved and authorised appointment of one additional at-large citizen member from Chesterfield County to serve on the Chesterfield/Colonial Heights Social Services Board. 14.C. APPOINTMENTS 14.C.1. BUILDING COD~ APPEALS BOARD The Board generally agreed that Mr. William G. Brandt, Jr., Electrical Engineer, and Mr. John A. Sanderson, Plumbing Contractor, be nominated to serve on the Building Code Appeals Board, whose formal appointment will be made on June 28, 1989. 14.C.2. JAMES RIVER CERTIFIED DEVELOPMENT COP~OP~KTION The Board generally agreed that the following persons be nominated to serve on the James River Certified Development Corporation, whose formal appointment will be made on June 28, 1989: Mr. C. F. Currin, Jr., Soard of Supervisors, Chesterfield County Mr. Gary R. McLaren, Director, Economic Development, Chesterfield County Mr. Carol W. Youngkin, Controller, FiTech Mr. Peter B. Cleal, Vice President, signet Bank Ms. Ann N. Anderson, Sales and Marketing Manager, Holiday Inn-Koger Center Mr. Samuel N. West, CPA, West, Crawley and Winn, PC Dr. Clinton W. Pettus, Vice President for Administration, Virginia State University Ms. Pansey N.J. Jackson, Assistant Professor of Language and Literature, virginia State University Dr. Edward W. Whitlow, retired Professor of Economies 14.C.3. METROPOLITAN CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUP~AU The Board generally agreed that the following persons be nominated to serve on the Metropolitan Convention and Visitors Bureau, whose formal appointments will be made on June 28, 1989: 89-61~ Ann N. Anderson, Sal~ and Marketing ~anager, Holiday Inn-KOger Center Zane Davis, Building Contractor Richard L. Young, Owner, ~atf-way Rouse Ann M. Daffer~ President, An~ Duffer Unanimous 14.G.4. ~[ETROPOLITAA~ ECONOMIC DE~LOP~ENT CQ0lqCIL - BOARD The BOard generally agreed that the foll0wing persen~ be neminate~ to serve on the ~etropclitan Econ~¢~fc Development Council ~oard of Directors, whose fo~al appointments will be ma~e on June 28, 19~9: Mr. Daniel W. Burger, ~lant ~nager, DuPont Mr. ~erbert T. Sink, Coordinator of Government Affairs, Virginia Power Mr. ~ishael D. MacNeilly, OperatiOnS Manager, Storer C~le Mr. William W. Te~ent, Chairman, Chesterfi~l~ Business Council ~r. Hank E. Riche$on, fo~mer Chesterfield Advisory Council member I4.C.~. CHESTERFIELD/COLO~!AL HEIGNT~ SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD On motion of Mr. Sullivan, ~econded by Mr. Currin~ the Board Suspended its rules %o Simultaneously nominate/appoint Re. Margaret G. Donovan to serve as the newly a~ded at-large member on the Chesterfield/Colonial Reight~ Social Services Board, which term is for a four-y~ar period beginning July 1, 1989. Vote; Unanimou~ On motion of M~. Sullivau, saoon~ed by ~r. Currin, the Board simultaneously nominated/appointed Ms. Margaret G. Donov~n serve a~ the newly added aa-large meg~bar on ~h~ Chester- field/Colonial Beighta Social Services Doard, ~hese term is effective July 1, 1989 and e~pires June 30, 1993. Vete~ Unanimous 14.D. CON~RT ITEMS 14.D.1. A~EOPRIATION FOR IMPROV~MENT~ TO LIND~RG DRIVE, On ~oticn of Mr. Curr±n, seconde~ by Mr. Mayas, the Board appropriated $200 from tAe Matoaoa Three Cent Read Fund for placement of stone on Lindberg Drive between Harrowgate Road and Jackson Street. (Xt is noted these improvements will no~ bring this street up to State ~tandards.) Vote: Unanimous ~9-619 14.D.2. APPROPRIATION FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO kN ALLEY ~ASEMEN~ IN CHESTER There was a brief discussion relative to citizens' concerns regarding whether or not the amount of funding being appropriated for ~mprovements to the alley easement in Chester located west of Centre Str~t and north of Route 10 between the P&M Bank and the Citgo Station would be sufficient, the width and length of the proposed improvement, etc. On motion of ~r. Currin, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board deferred consideration of an appropriation ~or improvements to an alley easement in Chester until July 26, 1989 to permit further discussion of the proposed improvements with concerned citizens. 14.D.3. APPROPRIATION FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO RAMONA AV~NUE A~D MAYWOOD STREET On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Mayes~ the Board appropriated $2000 from the Bermuda District Three Cent Road Fund for placement of stone on Ramona Avenue between Melbe Street and Maywo0d Street and on Maywo0d Street between Ramona Avenue and Seminole Avenue. 14.D.4. REQUESTS FOR FIREWORKS DISPLAYS 14.D.4.a. BRANDERMILL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, SUNDAY PARK On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved the request of the Brandermill Community Association for Vineland Fireworks to stage a fireworks display in the Sunday Park area of Brandermill on July 4, 1989, subject to all County policies and regulations governing same. Vote: Unanimous 14.D.4.b. GEORGE E. HOOVER~ BELLONA ARSENAL On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved the request of Mr. George F. Noover to ~tage a fireworks display on his private property at 2 Eellona Arsenal, Midlothian, Virginia, on July 4, 1989, subject to all County policies and regulations governing same. Vote: Unanimous 14.D.9. AIRPORT APRON OVERLAY GRANT MATCH APPROPRIATION AND CONTRACT APPROVAL On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board authorized the County Administrator to accept a Federal Aviation Gran~ (FA~) in the amount of $396,000 and a Virginia Department of Aviation Grant in the amount of $28,500 ~or the repair and asphalt overlay of 29,000 square yards of the airport apron at the Chesterfield County Airport; authorized the County Administrator to enter into contracts with the Federal and State goverDments for the expenditure of said funds; appropriated a total of $453,000 ($396,000 in Federal funds, $28,500 in State funds and $28,500 in County matching funds from the Airport Industrial Park Reserve) for the completion of said project; and authorized the County Administrator to solicit bids for the apron repair and overlay 89-620 responsible bidder. Vote: Unanimous 14.D.6. ACCEPTANC~ OF GRANT FOR LEAF COMPOSTING DEMONSTRATION On motion of Mr. Coffin, eeeonded by Mz. Mayas, the Board accepted and authorized tko County Administrator tm execute a grant from the State D~par+~m~nt of Mines, Minerals and Energy in the amount of $34,100 for a Zeal composting demonstration p~oject which is a cooperative e~ort Of the Department of General Servi¢os, the ~I ~xtension Service, the VPY Agronomy Department and ~he State Department of Wa~t~ Management; a~d appropriatod State grant funds in the amount of $34,18Q to the Sanitation Department for completion Of said co, posting demonstration Droject, which pro~ect i~ effective July 1, 1989. (~t is noted the County match for th~se fends will sonsist of in-kin~ sezvieee.) 14.D.7. STATE ROAD ~CCE~TANCE Thio day the County =nvironmental Euglneer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon examination of ~etmsley Road, Rachester Court and Vlburg Court in Salisbury Hatfield Section, Midlo~hian District. Upon consideration whereof, and On motion of Mr. Coffin, seconded by Mr. Mayes, it is reeolved that ~elmsley Road, Rochester Court and Viburg cou~t in Salisbury Hatfield Section, ~idlothian District, bs and they hereby are es=abiished as p~tio roads. A~d be it further resolved~ that th~ Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary system~ Helm~tey Road, beginning at the inter~ectiOn with Winterfield Road, State Route 714~ nad going westerly mile to the intersection with Rochester Court~ then cogtlnui~g westerly 0,09 ~ile to tho intersection with Viburg Court, and then continuing westerly 0.04 mile to 'end at proposed ~elmsley Road, ~allsbury Hatfis1~ Section Phase II; Rochester Court, beginning at ~he intersection with H~lmeley Poad and going southerly 0.30 mile to end in a cml-de-sac; and Viburg Court beginning at the intersection with ~el~sley Road and going southerly 0.28 mile ~c em6 in a oul-de-eac. This request i~ inclusive o~ the adjacent slope, eight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage Thcee roads serve 47 lots. And be it further resolved~ that the Boar~ of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Depar~ent cf T~ansporta=ion a 50 ~igh%-of-way for all of the~e ~ouds. Thio section of Salisbury is record=d as follows: Hat~ield Section. Plat Buck 55, Pag~ 25, November 3, 1986~ Vote: Unanimous This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directione from thi~ Board, made report in writin~ upon his ex~£nation of Queensgate Road, Chadowhill Court, Walton Park Road~ Coralviuw Road, Coralview Court, Coralview Terrace and 89-621 Glenshade Drive in Walton Park, Section P and a portion of Walton Perk, Section H, Midlothian District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Mayes, it is resolved that Queensgate Road, Shadcwhill Court, Walton Park Road, Coralview Road, Coralview Court, Coralview Terrace and Glenshede Drive in Walton Park, Section P and a portion of Walton Park, Section H, Midlothian District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Queensgatc Road, beginning at the inter- section with Watch Hill Road, Stat~ Route 1084, and going easterly 0.09 mile to the intersection with Shadowhill Court, then continuing easterly 0.18 mile to the intersection with Walton Park Road, then continuing easterly 0.01 mile to end in a dead end; Shadowhill Court, beginning at the intersection with Qu~ensg~te Road and going northerly 0.10 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Walton Park Road, beginning et the intersection with Queensgate Road and going northerly 0.15 mile to end at existing Walton Park Road, State Route 624; Coralview Road, beginning at the intersection with Walton Park Road, State Route 624, and going westerly 0.04 mile to the intersection with Coralview Court, then continuing westerly 0.06 mile to the intersection with Coralview Terrace, then continuing westerly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Coralview Court, beginning at the intersection with Co~alvlew Road and going southerly 0.14 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Coralview Terrace, beginning at the ihtersection with Coralview Road and going 0.11 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Glenshade Drive, beginning at the inter- section with Watch Hill Road, State Route 1084, and going 0.04 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage These roads serve 63 lots. And he it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of these roads except Walton Park Road which has a 60' right-of-way. These sections of Walton Park are recorded as follows: Section P. Plat Book 58, Paqe 56, August 5, 1987. Section H. Plat Book 35, Page 23, December 6, 1979. Vote: Unanimous This day the County ~nvironmental ~ngineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Wesanne Road, Wesanne Terrace, Lauren Lane, Lauren ~lace, Lauren Circle and Lauren Court in Queensmill, Section J, Midlothian District. Upon consideration whereof, and On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Mayes, it is resolved that Wesanne Road, Wesanne Terrace, Lauren Lane, La~ren Place, Lauren Circle and Lauren Court in Queensmill, Section J, Midlothian District, be and they hereby are established a~ public road~. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Weeanne Lane, beginning at the end of exist- ing Wesanne Lane, State Route 3883, and going northerly 0.06 mile to the intersection with Wesanne Terrace, then continuing northerly 0.08 mile to the intersection with Lauren Lane, then continuing northerly 0.11 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Wesanne 89-622 going westerly 0.05 mile, then tnrning and going southwesterly 0.09 mile to end in a ertl-de-sac; Lauron Lane, beginning at the end of existing Lauron Lane, State Route 3501, and going northeasterly 0.04 mile to the intersection with Lauren Court, then continuing nertheaoterly 0.07 mile to the intersection with Laur~n Circle, then continuing northeasterly 0.06 milo to the intersection with Lauren Place, then turning and going easterly 0.07 mite to the intersection with Weeanno Lane, then continuiag easterly 0.04 mile to end at p~oposed Laur~n Lane, Cedar Creeping, $ection 2; Lau=en Place, beginning at the intersection with Lauren Lane and going northerly 0.07 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Lauren Circle, beginning at the inter- section with Lauren Lane and going northwesterly O.O~ mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Lauren Co~rt, beginning at the inter- end in a cul-de-sac. as the road name. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department o£ Transportation drainage These roads serve 61 10ts. And be it further resolved~ that the Board of Supervisor~ guarantees to tho Virginia Departi~ent ef Transportation a §0~ right-of-way for all of those roads. This section of Queensmill is recorded as follows: Section J. Plat ~ook 55, Pages 91 & 92~ Janoary 5, 1987. This day the County ~nvirom~ental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this BO&rd, made report in writing upon hi~ ~xamination of Cardiff Road, Cardiff Way, Cardiff Conrt and Cardiff Place in Bexley, Section I2, Clover 5ill Distr~ct. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr, Ceftin, aecon~ed by Mr. Mayes~ it is resolved that ~ardiff Road, Cardiff Way, Cardiff Cenrt and cardiff Place in Bexley, Section 12, Clever 5ill Distriut, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that tho V~rginia Department of Tranaporta:ion, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary SyStem, Cardiff Road, beginning at the inturaectinn with exis~in~ Cardiff Rc~d, State Route 2fi~l~ and going northeasterly 0.11 mile to the intersection with Cardiff Way, then Continuing nertheasterly O.Q3 mile, th~n turning and going easterly 0.03 mile to the intors~etion wi~h Cardiff Court, then continuing easterly 0.06 milo to the intersection with Cardiff Place, then continuing easterly 0.13 mile =o end at proposed Cardiff Road, barley, S~ctien 1I~ Cardiff Way, beginning at the intersection with Cardiff Road and going northerly 0.Il mile, then turning and going northeasterly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Cardiff Court, beginning at the interse=tion with Cardif~ ~oad and ~olng northerly ~.12 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Cardiff Place, beginning at the intersection with Cardiff Road and going southerly ~.04 mile to end in a cul-d~-sae~ This request is inclusive of thm adjacent slope, ~ight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage These roads serve 44 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of thece roads. This section of Bexley is recorded as follows: Section 12. Plat Book 54, Pages 87 & 88, October 21, 1986. 14.D.8. I~SOLUTIO~ CONCERNING PROPOSED CHESAPEAKE BAY pt%ESER- VATION ACT IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors acknowledges the importance of the Chesapeake Bay and itc tribntariec to the economy~ the environment and the quality of life in Chesterfield and the entire State o£ Virginia; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County ia a rapidly developing community with a great number of land development issues and concerns facing its citizens; and WHEREAS, the implementation of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act is anticipated to place a significant burden on County planning, engineering, administrative and legal resources~ and WHEREAS, %he cost of implementation of the program requirements will far exceed the $10,600 made available to the County by the federal government and state government. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, that the County requests the General Assembly to appropriate additional funding and lsgal assistance that more adequately addresses the needs cf individual localities in their efforts to implement the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County Administrator is directed to present this resolution to the Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the Secretary of Natural Resources, the Chairman of the Ch~sapsake Bay Local Assistance Board, and to each 0£ ths other eighty-eight local governments affected by the regulations developed by the Chesapeake Bay Local Vote: Unanimous 14.E. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS 14.E.1.SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER RESTRICTION OF THROUGH TRUCK TRAFFIC ON LOCKSHIRH DRI%~E, NEWQUAY ROAD WALHALA DRIVE, RAMSGATE ~AN~ A~D SROADST0~E ROAD On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board set the date of July 26, 1989, at 9:00 a.m., for a public h~aring to consider %he restriction of through truck traffic on ~ockshire Drive, Newquay Road, Walhala Drive, Ramsqate Lane and Broadstone Road. 89-624 14.E.2. STKEET LIGHT COST AP~gOVAL On motion o~ Mr. Applegate, seconded by Nr. sullivan, the Board approved the cost for a street light installation at the intersectien of Academy Drive and Courthouse Roa~ with fund~ in the amount of $337.88 to be e×p~nded from the Clover Mill District Street Light Fund. 14.E.3. R~VIEW LAND USE AT THE NORTHEAST QUADKAMT OF ROUTE 150 There was brief discussion relative to the appropriateness of amending the Central ~ea Land Use and Trana~or~atien Plan concerning the designated land use at the northeast quadrant of Route 15~ (chippenham Barkway) and Route lQ, the ambiguousness o~ the lanquage in the Plan which it was ~lt neede~ tO be clarified by amending ~he ~lan, ~he eoncern~ of an area property owner a~ t~ impending financial r~ifica%ion$ amendmset would have on property he owns in the area, etc. Mr, Daniel stated he felt the current language of the Central Area Land U~e and Transportation ~lan was ambiguous an~ needed clarification. Messrs. Sullivan, Cwrrin and Maye~ indicated they felt the language was appropriate and it was not necessary to amend the Plan. Mr. Daniel stated that he did net feel the request to have %he Planning Commission revlcw and recommend Elan was unreasonable, would not necessitate additional expanse or s~aff, etc., and further that never during his tenure on Board had he witnessed the denial Of such a request. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. ApDlegate, the ~oard referred to the PlanniAg Cor~i~ei0n ~or review and a recommendation the Central Area Land USe and ~rans~ertation Plan aa to the determination of an appropriate land use designation for the northeast quadrant of Route 1~0 (chippsnha~ Parkway) and Route Ayes: ~r. Applegete an~ Mr. Daniel. t4.E.4. REFERRAL TO PLANNINQ CO~ISSION OF PROPOSED AN~ND~T TO ~0NING ORDINANC~ R~CARDING CRIMINAL P~NA~TXES ~IOLAT~O~S OF OONDITICNS OF ~ONING~_.~NDITI©NAL U~E P~RMIT$, SPECIAL EXC~PTIONS AND VARIANCES On motion of ~r. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currln, the Board re,erred to the Planning Commission for review and t/on ~ proposed amendment to ~ha Zoning Ordinance regarding criminal penaltiee for violations of conditie~a of zoning, conditional u~e psrmi~a~ special exceptions an~ variances and a~thorized double advertising to enabl~ the Board-~o conduct it~ public hearing on tbs proposed er~inance a~sndment on July 26, 1989, at 9~00 a,m.~ to ensure ~xpeditious consideration. Vote: Unanimous 14.E.5. kUTEOR~ZATIOM FOR THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR T0 EX~CUTE A LICENSE AGREF24ENT WITM MARUCMaAN, INC. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board authorized the County Administrator %o execute a Bicen~ Agreement with Maruchan, Ina., permitting i~ediate entry to =he 23.487 acr~ parcel at the Airport Industrial Park to begin clearing, grading and construction of its factory, with th= understanding ~hat Maruohan, Inc. is willing to provide ~9-625 assurances that it will pay for any damage to the property if, for any reason, the conveyance is not completed. 14.F. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ITEMS 14.F.1. PUBLIC ~BARIN~ TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE ~0 VACATR A PORTION OF AN 8 FOOT ~AS~NT IN CANDLELA~P SUBDIVI~ SION, SECTION C Mr. Welohon~ stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to vaoate a portion of an 8 foot easement across Lot 11, Candlelamp Subdivision, Section C. NO one came forward to speak in favor of or against the matter. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board adopted the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE to vacate a portion of an $ foot easement across Lot 11, Candlelamp Subdivision, Section C, Matoaca District, Chester£ield County, Virginia, as shown on' a plat thereof duly ~eeorded in the Clerk's O~fice of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in Plat Book 53, at.Pages 7 and 8. WEEREA$, James E. Deaver, Jr., petitioned the Seard of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia to vacate a portion of an S foot easement across Lot 11, Candlelamp Sub- division, S~otion C, Matoaoa District, Chesterfield County, Virginia more particularly shown on a plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of said County in Plat Book 53, Paqes 7 and 8, made by Balker & Associates, INC., dated May 5, 1986. The portion of the easement petitioned to be vacated is more fully described as follows: A portion of an 8 foot easement across Lot 11, Candlelamp Subdivision, Section C, the location of which is more fully shown, cross hatched on a plat made by Landmark Surveyors, ~no., dated March 21, 1989, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance. WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, a~ amended, by advertising; and W~EREAS, no public necessity exists for the continuanoe of the portion of the easement sought to be vacated. NOW T~EREFOR~, BE IT ORDAINED BY ~HE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHeSTeRFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA: That pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid portion of easement be and is hereby vacated. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accordsnce with Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Vir~inSa, 1950, as amended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance, together witk the plat attached he~eto shall be recorded no sooner than thirty ~ays hereafter in the Clerk's office of the Ci~cult Court of Chesterfield, Virginia pursuant to Section 15.1-485 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. The effect of this Ordinsnce pursuant to Section 15.1-483 is to destroy the force and effect of the reoording of the 89-626 portion' of the plat vaoated. T~i~ Ordinance shall vest fee ~imple tiEle to the portion of ea~men~ hele~y vacated in tbs property owner of the lot within Candlelamp Subdivision fre~ and clear ~f any righh~ of public use. Accordingly, this 0rdiDance shall be indexed in the names of the County of Chesterfield; as grantor, and James E. Dearer, 14.F.2. REQUEST TO AID DEVELOPER IN ACQUIRING WATER LI~E EASE- MENT$ ALONG AIVERWA¥ ROAD FROM MR. AND MRS~ STEVEN RICE On motion of Mr. Mayer, seconded by Mr. Currln, the Board approved a request ~om ~r. Phillip ~slsey of Millhise~ Halsey & Co., Inc., to aid the developer in acquiring waterline easements along Riverway ROa~ ~¢rO~s the property of M~. Steven N_ and Ms. Nancy H. Elco, provided the d~v~loper sig~s e contract with the County agreeing to Day for all cost~ involv- ed. (A copy of said plat is filed with th~ papers of this Board.} Vo~: Unania%ous 14.F.3. CONSENT ITEMS 14.F.~.a. A~ROVkL OF SEWER CO~TRACT FOR $SRING T~{ACE~ OF~j.SI~E SEWER On ~otion of Mr. Mayes~ seconded N~. CUrrln, the Eoard approved the following sewer contract and authorized the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents: 89-0561, Spring Trace - Offsite SeWer: Developer: Spring Trace Assuclatee Contractor: Lyttle Utilities, Inc. Total Contract Cost: $40,$87.90 Total Estimated County COSt: $13,67t.61 Est~ated D~velOper Cost: $27~216.29 Number of Connections: Future Code: 5N-25]1-997 Vote: Unanimous 14.F.3.b. APPROVA~ OF AGF~SMENT FOR VACATION AND REE~DICATION OF A ~EW~R EASEMENT ACROSS ~RO~E~Ty OF T~E COMMON- WEAL~ OF VIRGINIA On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Coffin, the Boa~d approved th~ vacation ~n4 ~e-dedicatiou Of :he sewer easement across propsrty of the Commonwealth of Vi~ginia~ snd authorized th~ Chairman of the Board and County Administrator to execute the easement agreement. (It is noted a copy of said plat i~ ~iled with th~ papers of 7his Board.) Vote: Unanimon~ 14.F.3.c. CONVEYANCE O? DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO THE VIRGINIA DEPART~TMT OF TRanSPORTATION AT IRONBRIDG~ PARK On motion cf Mr. Mayes, sseonde~ by Mr. Currln, the Board authorized the Chairman cf the Board and County Administrator to execute a drainage easement ~o virginia Department of Transportation in exchange for a deed to th~ exi~tlng right of way for the service rued, which easement is needed from the end 89-627 of an existing 50 foot wide drainage easement to Whitepine Road Extended. (A copy of said plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous 14.F,3.d. ACCEPTANCE OF DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG IRONBRIDGE ROAD FROM TRUSTEES OF IRONBRIDGE BAPTIST CHURCH On motion of Mr. Mayes, ~eoonded by Mr. Currin, the Board authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed of dedication accepting, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of a 10' strip of land along Ironbridge Road from the Trustees of Ironbridge Baptist Church. (A copy of said plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous 14.F.3.e. ACCEPTANCE OF DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG W00LRIDGE ROAD FROM INVESTORS WOODLAKE DEVELOPMENT CORPQRA- TION On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board authorized the county Administrator to execute the necessary deed of dedication aocepting, on behalf of the County, the conveyane~ of a 25' strip of land along Wootridge Road from Investors Woodlake Development Corporation. (A copy of said plat is filed with the papers of this Hoard.) Vote: Unanimous 14.F.3.f. ACCEPTANCE 0F DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG ROBIOUS ROAD FROM L. DALE PARRISH AND LINDA C. PAR-RISH On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board authorized the County Administrator to execute the neoeEsary deed of dedication accepting, on behalf of the county, the conveyance of a 15' strip of land along Robious Road from Mr. L. Dale Parrish and MS. Linda C. Parrish. (A copy of said plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous 14.G. REPORTS Mr. Ramsey presented the Board with a status report on the General Fund Contingency Account, General Fund Balance, Road Reserve Funds, District Road and Street Light Funds, Lease Purchases, School Board Agenda and Board Public Hearing Schedule. Mr. Ramsey stated the Virginia Department of Transportation has formally notified the County of the acceptance of the following roads into the State S~condary Road System: ~DDTTTONS WOODLAND POND - SECTION 2 Route 3670 (Woodland Pond Parkway) - From Route 3671 to 0.01 mile west Ronte 3677 Route 3671 (Waterfowl Flyway) - From Route 3670 to 0.01 mile south Route 3678 Route 3677 {old Squaw Lane) - From Route 3670 to south cul-de-sac LENGT~ 0.15 ~i. 0.60 Mi. 0.18 Mi. @9~628 WOODLAND POND - SECTION 2 (continued] Route 367~ (Gadwe!l Terrace) - From 0.24 mile northwest Route 3671 to 0.14 milo ~a~t Route 3671 GREAT OAKS - SECTION 7 Route 3091 (Ridgerun Road) - From 0.03 mile w~st Route 3094 to west cul-de-sac 0.07 Mi. NAPPY HILL FA~$ -$ECTIONS 1 AND 3 Route 3235 (Fielding Road) - From 0.01 mile southwest Route 3239 to Route 3239 Rout~ 3239 (Prairie Wood Drive) ~ From Route 3235 to Route 3236 0.16 Mi. 0.07 Mi. SOMERSET - EFCTI0~$ 3, 4, 5, 7 & 8 Route 118t {Tri Gate Road) - From 0.0I mile north Route 346~ to Route 8466 Route 3460 (Passageway Drive) - Prom 0.02 ~ile west Route 1185 to 0.13 mile west Route 1181 Ront~ 346~ (~assageway Drive) - From 0.04 mile east Route 1181 to nozth cul-de-sac Route 3462 {Dockside Drive) - From Ro~t~ 1181 to cast cul-de-sac Route ~48~ {North Light Drive) - From Route 1181 to east cuI-d~-sac Route 3465 (North Light Drive) - From Route 118I tO 0.13 mile southwest Route 118I ~ou:e ST~ {Dcg~ood Avenue} - From Route 874 to 0.13 mil~ ~on~hwest Route 1181 Route 3466 {Yard Arm Drive) - From 0,08 ~ile northeast Rout~ 1181 tO O.ll mile eouthwe~t ROute 1181 0.1~ Mi_ 0.18 ~i. 0.08 Mi. 0.04 Mi. 0.0~ ~i. 0.13 Mi. 0.2~ Mi. 0.19 Mi. LAUREL TRAIL Route 4600 {Laurel Trail Ro~d) - From Route 3600 to northeast cul-de-sac Route 4601 (Laurel Trail Court] - From Route 4600 to northeast cul-de-sac 0.24 Mi. 0.08 Mi. 14.G.5. REPORT OF THE PAY FOR GROWTH COMMITTEE After a brief diucuusio=, Mr. Appl~gate made a motion that the ~ay-For-Growth Report be considered complete and tabled indefinitely. There wa~ no second. Mr. AppI~gate stated the motion failed for lack of a ~eoond. It was generally agreed the report would remain On the Board agenda for future discussion. 89-629 2. ~X~CuTI~ SESSION On motion of Mr. Currin, s~conded by Mr. Daniel, the Board went into Executive Session to discus~ the condition, acquisition or use of real property for public purposes or the disposition of publicly held property pursuant' to Section 2.1-344 (a) (2) of the code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Vote= Unanimous 15. ADJOURNMENT On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board adjourned at 11:50 p.m. until 9:00 a.m. on June 28, 1989. Vote~ Unanimous 89-630 Chairman