11-14-90 MinutesOF S~ISO~S
MINUTES
1990
M. B. sullivan, Vice Chairman
Harry G. Daniel
staff in Attendance:
Ms. Amy Davis, Exec.
As~. to Co. Admin.
Mrs. Doris DeHart,
Ass%. Co. Admin.,
Legis. Svcs. and
Intergsvern. A~airs
Ms. Joan S. Dolezal,
~_r. Bradford S.
Deputy CO. Admin.,
Mr. william H. Howell,
Dir., Planning Dept.
MS. Mary Leu Lyle,
Dir., Accounting Dept.
Deputy Co. Admin,,
Mr. R. J. ~¢Craoken,
TransD. Director
Dir., Env. Eng. Dept.
Mrs. Pauline ~tohei1,
Info, S~rvio~s -'
Dr. William
Mr. Richard Sale,
'"Deputy CO. Admin.,
Development
~r. Jay Stegmaier,
Dir. of Budget &
Mr. David Welchens,
Dir. of u~ilitieS
1. CALL TO OI{DER
Mr. Currin called the work n~nn~o~ to order at ~;1~ p.m. (EST)
in the Adminls=ratio~ Building Conference Room (Room 502).
Mr. Ramsey stated the V~rginia Asso~ixt~o~ O~ Counties (rAce)
has ~$tablis~d a ~o~isslon on the Future~ which Commission
has d~v~lepo~ a stratsgio plan to provide the support needed
by the counties of the Commonwealth. He outlined thc
Commission's structure, goals and objectives and Dresent=d
brief video outlininq the wide variety of chan~e~ and
being placed on localities.
90-833 11/14/90
2. ADOPTION OF I~ESOLUTION ACCEPTIN~ Tm ~OW BID FOR PURCHASE
OF $36,500,000 ~ OBLI~ATI~
on motion of the Hoard, the following resolution was adopted:
A ~F~OLUTION ACCEPTING A PRO~ ~R 'l~ ~E OF
~I~-SIX ~LLION FI~ ~ ~S~
($36,580,000) ~INCIP~ ~ oF P~LIC I~O~
~RGINIA: ~P~ING ~ DET~LS OF SUCH ~S
FIXIN~ ~ T~ST ~ ~ BE ~ BY S~ ~S;
DIS~IB~ 'r~F; ~TI~NG ~T~N ACTS
PROU~'f~IN~; ~ ~WlSZ p~DIN~ ~R T~ IS~U~CE
OF ~ ~
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF TEE
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA:
SECTION 1- Findings and Determinations. Pursuant
to resolutions adcpte~ by this Board on ~k~tobux 11~ 1989,
~nti~led "A I~ESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR T~
ISSUANCE, SALE AIqD DELIVERY OF FORTY-ONE MILLION ~0 HUNDRED
TEN T~0USAND DOLLARS ($41,210,080) PRINCIPAL AMO~T 0F PUBLIC
IMPROVE~NT BONDS OF THE COUNTY OF CHeSTERFIeLD, VIRGINIA, AND
PROVIDING WITH RESPECT TO THE IssuANCE AND SALE OF A LIKE
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OP PUBLIG IMJPROVE~EICT BOND A/~TICIPATION NOTES
IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF SUCH BONDS", and
on 0etcher 24, 1990, entitled "A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND
PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELI%fl~RY OF FOURTEEN
MILLION EIGHT HUNDRED SEVEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($14,8~7,~00}
PRINCIPAL A~0UI~T OF PUBLIC IY~ROVEMEWT BONDS OF
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, AND PROVIDING WITH R~$PECT TO
ISSUANCE AND SAL~ OF A AiK~ ~RIWCIp~L AMOUNT OF PUBLIC
I~PROV~NT BO~D ANTICIPATION NOTES IN ANTICIPAT~0N OF
ISSUANCE AND SALE OF SUCH BONDS" (the "Authorizing
Resolutions"), a Summar~ Notice Of Sale (the "Sl~mmar~ ~otice
of Sale"} of Thirty-Six Million Fiv~ Hundred Thousand Dollars
($36,~00,000) priBcipal amount of Public Im9ravement
Series of 1990B (the "Bonds"), was duly published on November
5, 199Q, in The Bond Buyer, a financial journal published in
the City of New YOEk, New York, a~d a De,ailed Notice of Sale
o~ the Bonds, dated November 5, 1990 (tke "Detailed Notice Of
Sale"), was prepared and distributed to prospective purchasers
of the Bond~.
The $~mmar¥ Notice o~ Sale and the ~etailed ~otice
of Sale p~OVided that s~aled proposals for th~ purchase of the
Bonds would be received by or on behalf cf tke county, at the
office~ of the Deputy County Administrator, Room 502, 5th
Floor, Chesterfield County Administration Euilding, ~901 Lcri
Road, Chesterfield, Virginia 23832, until 11:00 A.~., Eastern
Standard Time, o~ Wednesday, November 14, 1990, at which ~ime
and place all proposals would be p~blicly opened.
Pursuant to the Detailed Notice of Sale, nin~ (9)
proposals for the purchase o~ the Bon~s were received, each
accompanied by a certified Qr baugk treasurur~ or cashier's
good faith ehe~k payable to the order e~ the county of
Chesterfield, Virgimia~ in ~he amount of $365,000. The names
of the bidders submitting ~ach s~ch proposal, ~he purchase
price for the Bonds specific~ in each suc~ proposal and the
true interest cost to the Count~ resulting from each such
proposal are as follows:
90-831 11/14/90
Name of Bidder Specified
Chase Secu=ities, Inc. $36,500,255.50
Merrill Lynch & Co. 36,500,000.00
Goldman, Sachs & Cc. 36,531,809.75
Dean Witter R¢irnolds Inc, 36,505,931.25
Bear, stearns & CO. Inc. 36,501,350.5~
BT Securities Corporation 36,505,456.75
Kemper Capital Markets 36,518,913.~
J.P. Morgan Securities, 36,502,080.00
Barris Trust & Savings 36,500,182.50
Coat
6.6123 %
6.6398
6.6400
6.6443
6.6508
6.6599
6.6834
After due ccnside~atio~ of all snch proposals, this
Board ~inda that (a) Chase securities, Inc. (=he "Purchaser~)
is a respon~ible bidder, (b) of the proposals received, the
proposal o~ the ~urohaser (~he "Proposal") is the proposal to
purchase the Bonds at the lowest true inter~t cost to the
County~ determined by dcubllng the semiannual interest rate
(compounded semiannually) necessary to discount the d~bt
service payments from the 9~yment dates to the date of the
Bonds (~ov~mber 15, 1990) and to the price bid, excluding
interest accrued to the date of delivery, and (¢) the ProPosal
is the best proposal received, is in accordance wXth th~
provisions of the Detailed Notice of Sale~ and should be
SECTION 2. Acceptance o~ Proposal. The Proposal,
being a proposal to purchase the Bonds at the price of
Thirty-SiX Million Five Hundred Thousand TWO Hundred
Fifty-Five and 50/100 Dollar~ ($36,500,255.50), plus acorue~
interest from the date of the Bo~ds to the date of delivery
thereo~ by :he County a~d payment therefor by the Purchaser,
with the Bonds to bear interest at the rates per annum
specified in Section 4 hereof, is hereb~ accepted an~ the
Bonds are h~reby awarded to the Purchaser.
SECTION 3. Good Faith checks. The good faith
cheeks of ~he ~ue~ful bidder~ shall be returned
foEthwith. The ~ood faith check of the Purchaser will be
deposited by the County and the proceeds thereof credited
against the purchase price due for the Bonds upon their
delivery or retained as and for liquidated damages in the case
the Purchaser ~ails to accept delivery of and pay for the
Bonds in a=uordance with the Proposal.
SECTION 4. Approval of the Detail~ of the
The details of the Bonds se% forth in the Detailed No%ice of
Sale are h~r~by ratified, approved and confirmed. In
accordance w~th ~he provisions u~ the A~thurizln~ Rosolutlons,
the Detailed ~otice of Eale and the Propo~al, the Bonds shall
be designated and known as "Public Improvement Bonds, Series
of 1990B". The Bonds shall be dated November t5, 1990; shall
be numbered from No. R-5 Ul~Wards in order of issuance; ehall
be issued in fully registered form in the denomination of
$5~000 each or any integral multiple thereof~ and shall mature
on January 1 in each of the years and in the amounts ~et
below, with the Bonds maturing in each of the years specified
below bearing interest payable on July 1, 1991 and
s~iannually on each Junuury 1 and Julw 1 thureufter at the
rate per annam set forth opposite such year, as follows:
Principal Interest Principal Interest
Year Amount Rate Year Amsunt Rate
1992 $1,S~5,000 8.00% 2001 $1,825,000 6.375%
1993 1,825,000 8.00 2002 1,825,000 6.50
1994 1,S28,000 8.00 2003 1,825,000
1995 1,825,000 7.40 2004 1,825,000 6.60
1996 1,825,000 6.00 2005 1,S25,OO0 6.625
1997 1,825,000 6.00 2006 1,SZS,00U 6.70
1995 1,825,000 6.10 2007 1,82§,000
1999 1,825,000 6~20 2011 7,300,000 6.70
2000 1,825,000 6.30
The Bonds ehall be i~sue~ only in fully registered
will be issued to and reqi~tcred in the name of Cede & co., a~
nominee of The Depositer~ Tr~t Company, New York, New York
shall be immobilized in the custody of DTC~ DTC will act as
securities depository for the Bonds. Individual purchases
will be made in book-entry form only, in the principal ~ount
of $5,00U or any int~gret multiple thereof. Purchaser~ wilt
no% receive physical delivery of certificates repreaentin~
their interest in the Bo~d~ purchased.
Principal, premium, if any, and interest payments on
the Bends will b~ made by the County ~y wire transfer ~o DTC
or its ~ominee, Cede & ~o., as registered owner of the
which will i~ turn r~mit such payments %0 the DTC participants
for sttbaequent disburse! to the beneficial owners of
Bonde. Transfer o~ principal, premium, if any, and interest
payments to DTC participants will be the responsibility of
DTC. Transfers of such paSauents to beneficial owners of the
Bonds by DTC participants will be the responsibility o~ such
participants and other nominees o~ such beneficial owner~.
Transiers o~ ownership interesUs in the Bolds will be
accomplished by book entries made by DTC and, in turn, by the
DTC participants who act on behalf of the indirect
participants e~ DTC and the beneficial owners o~ the Bonds.
The County will not be responsible or liable
sending tra~naction state, dents or for maintainiPg~ supervising
or reviewing records maintained by DTC, its participants or
persons ac~i~g through such participants or for transmittinq
payments te~ co~uniea~ing with, notifying, or otherwise
dealing with any beneficial owner cf th¢ Bonds. ~o lon~ as
the Bonds are in book-entry only form, the cc~nt~ Treasurer
will serve as Registrar and Payinq Agent for the Bonds. The
Cc~ty reserves the right ~o designate a suCCessor Registrar
and Paying Agent for th~ Bond~ if the Bonds at any time
to be i~ book~entr~ o~ly foIm-
The Bonds maturing o~ and bgfor~ January 1, 2001
shall net be subject ho red~ption prior to their
maturities. ~e Bonds maturinq on and after Janaary 1, 2002
(o~ portions thereof in installments of $5,000) shall
subject to red~ption at the option o~ the cowry prior
their stated ~aturi~i~s on or after January 1, 2001, in whol~
at any time or in part o~ a~ interest pa~ent date, in
order as may be determined by the county (except that i~ at
any tim~ less than all of the Bonds of a given ~at~rity
called for redemption, th= partio~lar Bonds Or
thereof shall be selected by 1Ot)~ ~9on pa~en% of the
following redemption pricee (expressed as a percentage
principal amount of Bonds to be redeemed), ~ogether with the
interest accrued on tho p~incipal ~o~t to be redeemed to the
date fixed for t~e redemption thereof:
Redemption Dates Redemption Prices
January 1, 2001 to December 31, 200I 102%
January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002 101
JaDuary l, 2083 and thereafter
The Bonds maturing on January
subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption on January 1,
2008 and on January I of math year
the principal amounts in each year set forth below, with the
particular Bend Or Bends or portions thereof ne be selected by
lot, Bpon paIanent of the principal amount of the Bonds to be
redeemed, together with the interest accrued on the principal
~h~ount to be redeemed to the date fixed for the redemption
(January 1) Principal Amount
2008 $1,825,~00
2009 1,825,000
2010 1,825,000
2011' 1,S25,000
* ~aturity
The County, at its option~ may credit against such mandatory
sinking fund redemption r~q~ir~ment, the prlncipa~ amount o~
any Bonds maturing on January 1, 2011 which have been
purchased and ¢ancelled ~y the County or which have been
r~deemed and not theretofore applied as a credit agaln~t ~uoh
mandatory sinking ~und redemption requirement.
If any Bond (or any portion of the principal amount
thereof in installments of $5,000) shall be called for
redemption~ notice of the redemption thereof, specifying the
date, number and maturity of such Bond, the date and place or
place~ fixed for it~ redemption, the premium, if any, payable
upon such redemption, and if !ess than the entire principal
amount of s~ch Bond i~ tO be rede~ed, that ~ch Bond must be
surrendered in exchange for the principal amount theieof to be
redeemed and a new Bond cr Bonds issued equalling in principal
amount that portion of the principal amount thereof not to be
redeemed, shall be mailed not less than thkrty (30) days prior
to the date fixed for redemption by first slssa mail, postage
prepaid, to the registered owner of such Bond at h~s address
as it appears on the books of registry kept by =he Registrar
for the Bonds. The Registrar shall not be required to
exchange or transfer any Bond later than the close of business
on thc forty-fifth (45=h) day preceding the date fixed for
redemption Of SUch Bond or any portion thereof. I~ notice ~f
the redemption of any Bond shall have been given as aforesaid,
and pa!rmcnt of thc principal amount of such Bend (or the
~ortiun of =he principal am0u~t thereo~ to be redeemed) and of
the accrued interest and premium, if any, parable upon such
radem~tlon shall hav~ been duly made ur ~rovlded ~or, interest
on such Bond shall cease to accrue from and after the date so
hook-entry only form, any notice of redemption will be given
only to I~fC Or its nominee. The County shall not be
resp0~sihle for providing any beneficial owner of the Bonds
with notice of redemption.
SECTION 5. Execution and Delivery of the Bonds.
The Chairman and Clerk of this ~0ard, the County
officers, employees and agents of the County are authorized
90-837 11/14/90
appropriate to eff~ot the printing, execution and i~suan¢~ of
the Bonds and the delivery of the ~Qn~ tO the Purchaser in
accordance with the terms of the Proposal, the Detailed Notico
of Sale, and this resolution, upon reculpt of the purchase
price therefor as set ~orth in Section 2 hereof, and for the
proper application and use of the proceeds of such sale.
SECTION 6. Preliminary Official Stat~ment~ Official
Statement; Certification Concerning Official ~tat=m~nt. The
Chairman of thio Beard and the county Administrator are hereby
a~thorfzed and directed to execute and deliver tO the
Purchaser copier of an official s=a=~ment of tho County
relating ~0 the ~onds, in substantially the form of the
Preliminary Official Statement c~ fhe County relating to the
Bonds, dated November ~, 1990 {the "~reliminary Official
statement"), after the same has been completed by the
inser~ic~ of the interest rates to be borne by the Bonds and
by making such other insertions, change~ or ccrreutlons as the
county Administrator, based on the advice of the County's
financial advisors and legal counsel, deems necessary or
appropriate; and =his Board hpreby authorizes such Official
Statement and the information contained therein to b~ usod by
the ~uro~asex in connection with ~he sal~ of the Bond~. The
Cc~ty Administrator and the Director of Accounting are h~reby
authorized and ~trected to execute on behalf of ~he County and
deliver to the Purchaser the certificate referred to in the
Official statement undoI the caption "Certificate Concerning
official s=atement".
SSCT!O~ 7. Ratification, The action of the County
Administrator in ee~sin~ the summary Notice of Sale ts he
published as described in section 1 hereof, and in causing the
Detailed Notice of ~ale, a Proposal for Purchase of Thirty-six
Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($36,500,~0) 6ChOral
Obligation Public Improvement ~cnds, Series of 1990B, and ~he
Proliminary Official Statement to be distributed, and the
add contents of the S~ary Notice of Sale, the Detailed
Notice of sale such Proposal and the Preliminary Official
Statement, and all actions and proceedings heretofore taken b¥
this Board, the County Administrator and the other officerz,
employees, agents and attorneys of the County in eonnectio~
with the issuance and sale of the Bend~, are hereby ratified
and confirmed.
SECTION 8. Filing of Thi& Resolution. The CQunfy
Attorney im hereby authorized and directed to file a copy of
his resolution, certified by the Clerk of thi~ Board to be a
true and correct cop~ hereof, with the Circuit Court of th~
County of CheSterfield.
SECTION 9. Invalidity u~ Sections~ Pasagraph~
Clause0 ~r ~rovisions. If any section, paragraph, claUSe or
prevision of this resolution shall ~o held invalid or
unenforceable for any r~ason, the invalidity er unenforce-
ability of ~ueh section, paragraph~ clause er provision shall
not ~eot any of the remaining portions of thi~ re~olution.
SZCTIO~ 10. Keadinqa of Sections. The headings of
the sections of this resolution shall be solely for
convenience of reforcn¢~ and shall net a~fect the meaning,
construction, interpretation er effect of such ~ections or cf
this resolution.
SECTION 11. Effective Date. This resole[ion shall
Voto: Unanimous
90-83g 11/1~/90
Mr. Hammer introduced Mr. Roger Burns and MI. Mol sha~fer,
members of the Airport Advisory Committee who were present,
and Mr. David Barol, consultant with Gellman Re~sarch
A~sociate~, Inc. Mr. Barol presente~ an overview cf A
Management study of Airport Operat~on~ for Chesterfield Count~
Airport, which included data relative to Airport governance,
strategy and mission, the public management triangle, guiding
principles, qualification and functlon~ of an Airport Manager,
financial re=urn data, Airport debt capacity, various
scenarios of who ~hould managS, govern and opera=e fha
facility, etc. (A copy cf said report is filed with th~
papers of this Board~)
Discussion, questions and comments ensued relativ~ to the
value of the Airport to the overall economic development of
the County; debt capacity; revenue returns; advantage and/or
disadvantages of the various scenarios of Airport governances;
competitiveness, input from the Airport Advisory Board;
conversion ~rom a "break-eve~- to a "self-sustaining,~
operation~ e=c. Mr. Burns and Mr. shaffer outlined concern~
of the Airport Advisory Board regarding the report and
indica=ed =he Advisory Board was nut entirely in agreement
with the consultant's recommendations.
After further discussion, it W~s the general cnn~ensus of tho
~oard ~e accept the report, as s~lbmitted~ a~d eut~oriz~ the
County Administrator to take the necessary steps to execute
a Re~uest For Purshase (RFP) to hire an Airport Manager and
recruit a Fixed Based 0para%or (FBO) for the maintenance/fuel
operation of the Airport facility; an~ further to utilize the
expertise of th~ Airport Advisory Board in conjunction with
thi~ project.
After brief discussion, the ~oard considered deferring Item
4., =xecutive Session un=il the end of the meeting.
It was generally agreed to reces~ for five (5) minutes.
Reconveying:
Mr. Ha~r presort=ed an overview o~ the RecyGli~g Co~ittee
Report, outlining it= mia=ion stat~nt, Strategic Solid Wasta
Management Plan and Recycling, thc role O~ Chesterfield
County, gener~l polic~ state~, ~inancial policies,
reoo~ended progr~a fo= i~cycling, roles of citizens, schools
and ~ov~r~en~al institutions ~r c~unity education~ role of
the private sector, l~gisla~ive and ordina~c~ changes,
reco~enda<io~s of ~he Recycling Co~ittee for ~92; et=., and
presented thc Board with copies of graphic comparisons of
landfill disposal ra=~s, copie~ of which are filad with the
papers of this Board.
of :onnaqe at the landiills due to incruused tipping fee~ and
haul~ locating oth~r sources for ~heir material; unpaid
tonnage b~in~ Drought to the land~ills; collection cf surbsi4e
recycled materials being borne by each hous~hold or collection
pein= through collection/disposal fees cha~ged to the
landfills; rural/urban ~ervices; co~ercial/indu~trial
recycling; ~afe disposal of t~r6s, batteries, etc.~ the
90-839
County's responsibility ~or providing for the safe disposal Of
waste; tha~ WaSte disposal should be fee-based, not
supported; and that recycling should be charged at the
household level~ etc,
however, staff would ba bringing forth to the ~card Solid
Waste comittee in tho near future specific actions and/or
policies for the Board's consideration and approval.
3.C. Rk','KNSI~S OF p~T.TG WAX~/OR SEWER SERWICETOKKIST-
INGS~BDMSIONS
DU~ to nim~ constraints, it was generally agreed =o di~cus~
extension~ of p~lic water and/or suw~r ~ervice to existing
subdivisions in i~s scheduled ae~ence on th~ agenda during
After a brief discussion, the ~oard decided not to defer the
Executive ~ession.
On motion of Mr. Sullivan, sccondo~ by Mr. Coffin, the Board
went into Executive session pursuant to Section 2.1-344
of the Cede of virginia, 1950, as amended, to consult with
counsel regarding legal issues involving the James River Trunk
Egtension Project; discussion pursuant ~o Section 2.1-3~
(a)(3) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, regarding
th~ condition and use of ~chool projects to he constructed by
general oDligation debt; and pursuant to Section
(al(7) of the Cede of Virginia, 1950, as amended, to consult
with counsel regarding legal issues involving Fru-con v.
Chesterfield County.
Mr. currin sba=ed ~hat during the Executive Session the Eoar~
~ise~s~ed with counsel only those issues prcviousl~ indicated
with the exception of legal issues involving the Jame~ River
Trunk Extension ~roject.
On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded Dy Mr- Applegate, the
~oard udeDted the followin~ resolution:
WHEREAS, the Board of SuRervisors has this day ad]corned
into E~eoutive Session in accordance wi~h a formal vets of the
Board, and in accordance with the provisions oi the Virginia
Freedom of Information Act~ and
WHEP~EAS, the Virginia ~reedom of Information Act
effective July 1, 1989. provides for u~r~ification that such
Executiv~ Session was conducted in conformit~ with law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
supervisors does her~hM certify that to the best Of each
member's knowledge, i) only public business matters lawfully
exempted fro~ open meeting r~quirements ~ndar :ho Freedom of
I~formation Act were discussed in tho ~xecutive Session to
whloh this uertifioation applies, and ii] only such public
business matters as were identified in tho Motion by which the
90-840 11/14/90
certification.
The Board being polled, the vote was as follows:
Mr. Daniel: Aye.
Nr. Sullivan: Aye.
Nr. Applegat~ Aye,
Mr. Ceftin: Aye.
C~fe at the Chesterfield County Airport for dinner.
6. INVOCATI~
Mr. S. H. Applegate, Clover Hill District supervisor, gave the
invocation.
7. ]~.m]G~ OF ALLEGIANCE TO 'r~ FLAG OF '~ UNI'r~u STATES OF
~CA
Mr. Hugh Robartson, reporter for the Richmond Times Dispatch,
led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States
cf America.
R. A~PROVALOF ~INI~S
On motion of Mr. App!egate, s~onded by ~r. Mayas, the Board
approved th~ minute~ of October 24, !990, ae ~ubmit~ed.
Ayes: ~r. currin, Mr. ADDle~at~, Mr- Daniel and Mr. Mayas.
Abstention: ~tr. S~llivan, as he was absent from that m~ting.
Mr. Ramse~ announced that Mr. ~gh Robertso~, reporter for th~
Rio~ond Timez ~ispa~ch, will be retiring Nove~er 16, 1990
and briefly o~tli~d hi~ professional background and
in~roduoed ~. Mitch Z~mei who ha~ b~en assigned ~u the
Co~ty. The ~oard co~e~ded ~. Robert~on for his diligent
servio~ and professionalism in coverin~ the County new= and
wished h~ w~ll in his retirement and welc~ed ~r. Zemel to
the County.
It was generally agreed that a resolution honoring Mr.
~Qb~r~$OR ~pon his retlr~ent be presented a~ the Nove~er 28,
1990 meeting.
Mr. Daniel reported he au=enQed =he capi=al ~egion Airport
Commissiun (CRAC) meeting, at which it was noted that traffic
activity continued to improve~ attended the Richmond Regional
Planning District Commission meeting, ut which iasues were
raised by local jurisdi~ion~ concerning the Chesapeake ~ay
~reservation Act, res~lting in a meeting being scheduled
November 26, 1990, at 1=00 p.m., at the Philip Morr~s
~a~ufacturing Center Auditorium, at which he felt the County
eheuld be represented to present Chesterfield County's
position on this matter~ and also attended the Richmond Area
M~tropolitan TransD0rtation Planning Organization (EPO)
meeting.
the successful Veteran's Day Ceremony on November 11, 1990.
Mr. Applegate reported he attended the Capital Region Airport
Commission (CRAC) meeting; the ~e=ropolitan
Development Co~n¢il (~DC) meeting, at which a resolution
adopted to bm presented to =he can=tel area caucus of the
General A~sumbly requesting that they return to the Chesapeake
Bay Local Assistance ~card an4 request an indepth study Of the
economic impact of such provlslons~ and algo, as a
representative of MEDC~ accompanied MI. Currin and Mr. Ramsay
and staff to New York to attend an annual marketing meeting at
which the Governor presented a report to top management.
Mr. Sullivan reported he attended several meetings, one of
which was the Midlothian Str~tseape meeting, at which there
was a large attendance and a great deal of enthusiasm and
further expressed his apprpeiati0n for the ~oard~s action on
the matter in his absence.
Mr. Currin noted that he had attended many of the same
m~etlngs reported on by other Board members.
11. R~UESTS TO ~Os'r~ON~ ACTION, ~'~'.,RGENCY ADDITIONS OR
CHANGES IN 'x~u~(~D~OF P~ES~2TATI~
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. sullivan, the
Board added Item !6.A.6.e., To Consider Adoption o! an
Amendment to Section ~-55 Of the Co~ty Code Defining the
Eff~ctiv~ ~a~ of a~ Increase to th~ County's Au~i~ Fee for
Bi,lo/Raffle Permits on an Emergenc~ basis, and set a p~lic
heariag date; added to existing Item 16.A.2., R~quea~s ~ur
Singe/Raffle Permits, a r~est for a raffle ps/mit from the
~til Nove~er 28, 1190 at 9:00 a.m., item 15.D., Public
Appropria%e $47,275,000 in ~ond ~roceeds and I~t~rest,
Adoption o~ Bond Authorization Resolution; and adopted the
agenda, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
12. RESOLUTIONS AND Sl~ECIAL P~ECOG~ITIONB
There wore no resolution and special
time.
recognitions at this
There were no hearings of citizens on unscheduled matterg or
claims.
o ~'x~NSlONS OF PUBLIC WATER AND/OR SEWER SERVICE TO EXISTING
SUBDIVISI~
~. Sale stated this matter was de~erred from the September 26,
1990 Board me~tinq~ ~xplaine~ th~ proposed program and
financing mechanism prepared by staff for extending publi~
water and/or sewer service to existing subdivisions as an
alternative to the c~rrent policy of financing the extension
of these services via assessment/development districts.
90-842 11/14/90
Que~tio~s were raised relative t0 the proposed prnjeotlon of
$85,00~,000 ~or said project~ /mpacts to and estimates for the
inclusion of additional water ~anks, larger lines to certain
areas, additions to water treatment plants, etQ,; additional
coStS for engin~erin~ of $8-12 million; the numbers of homes
impacted by th~ proposed prOqram; reference to Dr. Nelson's
le~er and whether or not there were currently any knQWn
~xi~ting public hea~th and safety pxoblems which would warrant
ju~ti~ioation of approval of the proposed program; proposed
financing al=arnatlve~; the potential for public utility rate
i~creases in spite of whether or not the proposed program were
to be implemented, due not only in terms o~ water impr0vemen~s
required by the F~deral g~vernment but also wa~tewater
treatment as well; compliance of petitioners with
critaria; etc.
~en aske~, Dr. ~elson stated ther~ ar~ no p~lic health
complaints that would stimulate s=cha proq~ at thi~ time as
area wher~ s~ch incidents may hav~ ocourred a~d the CoUnty
aware of have already been addressed.
~er~ was f~rther discussio~ ~n~ued relative to
within the County having insufflci~t water supply, septic
occurri~q in Glebe Point, AShley Woods, e~c., investigations
of reported well watex problems; the ~afeness of u~ing w~lI
water, etc. Dr. Nelson stated he wa~ comfor=able that the
w~ll Water i~ the County was ~afe for ua~. He ~tated he
not aware of any public health problems a= ~his tim~ resulting
from a~y reported incidsn~s involving well wate~ and~ in him
ju~en=, %her~ axe no health and safety issues in r~lat~on-
ship to the need for public water and/or sewer =t this
within ~dlvisions due to groundwater cont~ina=ion
septic syst¢~ failures. Hu stated ~h~ may be well ~roble~
mechanisms and altmrnatives, which Mr. Sale briefl~ ~xplained,
including financing of extension of ~hese services through a
combination of uwaer partiGipation, G~n~ral Fund and Utility
F~ds, ~urrent policy versus the proposed policy,
potential for exacerbation of the problem by impl~ntation of
the proposed policy, etc.
Mr. Barfly, a resid~n~ of Chalkle~ Rbad, expressed
~elative to his inability tu obtain p~lic water for his
residence al%hough there are p~lic water and ~ewer lines
within clo~ proximity ~o his property. He ~rese~ted a brief
outline of dii!iculties experienced in dri!tin~ wells on
sit~, i~ade~a=e water ~u991i~s r~s~lt~ng in his ~iI~ having
to utilize laundromats and the e~p~nse involved,
water, expressed ooD~ern for the safety o~ his h~me in the
=hat the controlling factor would b~ the Capital I~proveme~t
Program, voted on annually by the Board of Su~ervis0rs, and
%hat the first item of concern in ~hut regard would be ~hat
included a lizting of projects ~or that particular year;
thut he was c0~for=able, from th~ information provided by Dr.
N~l~on, tha~ ther~ axe no z~divi~i~ns of concer~ relative
modification to item 1 (c} and the use o~ Seneral Fund
11114/90
pMovidu relief for th~ proDloms in that aras aa compared
the same ty~es of problem~ that have received assistance from
the County in the Upper Swift Creek area~ that he felt the
proposal being considered was an effort to softest
problems in e~is~ing subdivisions that were li~ted in the
Capital Improvement Program~ and ~xpressed oo~oer~ relative to
inequities in County policies and the use of the ~eneral Fund
monies for the Matoaoa District versus o~her areas o~ the
County.
~r. Apple~ate stated the County doe~ n~t have a
governing th~ ~se of public utilities in the Upper Swift Creek
area at this time; expressed conceru as to the implemen=ation
of a program wkea there is ac feasible financing mechanism
available for s~me; that if such a program were to ba
implemented it would necessitate a rare increase; and the
rationale for ~uch action wa~ not apparent.
Mr. S~llivan stated he und~r~tood, from the information
provided, there was no basis for a priority li~tin~; that
there is no tax money ih public utilities and the costs are
paid by the ratspa~ers; that siqnificant stn~s of money would
be involved if the proposed program were implemented and the
County should remain wi~h its existing policy; voiced
opposition to the proposed program aa he f~l~ it would
significantly impaot all ratepayers financially and that he
was opposed Po this proposal; and that ~e would ce~ti~ue to
vote in opposition to any Capital Improvement ~rogram that
would include
When asked, Mr. Micas indicated, in an effort to correct an
existing problem on the ~eiverds' property, the
corrected the problem an~ is ~n the process of recouping the
necessary fund~ from the individuals involved.
Mr. Currin stated he has major concerns regarding sewerage
problems in certain areas of the County as well as this
prcposal's impact O~ ~tility rates a~d has voted a~ainst such
pr0Dosals as this i~ the past but he feels this ea~
controlled through the Capiual Improvement Projects and,
therefore, h~ could support it.
After further discussion, it was on motio~ of Mr. Daniel,
seconded by Mr. Ney, s, the Board adopted the following polic~:
a) The policy is that annually a Capital
Improvement Progra~ will be develeps~ for
extensions to existing homes and submitted to
the Board of Supervisors ~or approval.
Specific projects must be outlined in the CIP.
b) Requests for extensions will he initiate~ by
submission of a petition form supplied by the
Department o£ Utilities from those residents
desiriug service and shall designate a
spokesperson to work with Co=ut¥ staff and
residents e{ the area. Petitions mu~t be
~igned by at least 55% oi thc residents Of the
area.
e) There ~st be at lsa~t 6 existing homeg
~,O~ f~et of extension in order fur petition
to be considered further.
Each petition res,ired that conforms to 1. b
will be reviewed and assigned a priority number
based on the attached criteria. Projects will
be included in the capital Improvement Budget
in priority order up to the amount of funds
allocated. ~roject~ not funded in the Capital
Budget and new petitions
received will be reviewed for inoiusi0D in
future Capital Improvemen~ ~udgets.
el spokesperson will be advised of the p~ojaot
status upom approval of the Capital Improvement
Budget.
f) It shall be mandatory for each prnpex%y owner
to apply for cervlse and pay the co~necti0n fee
within 30 days o~ completion of th~ project and
to beqin pa~nG the customer and capacity
star,es. Commodity ohargee will be ~eferred
until the property is connected %O ~he public
system. The connection fee will be =he fee iD
affect at the beginning of the fiscal u~ar the
project ~s completely funded.
~e Departmea~ of Utilitie~ will notify each
resident (property owner) upon completion of
the project that service is available.
ADd f~rther,
eub~ittal, ss
the Board incorporated tko ~inancing for th~
public water amd/or sewer service t~ existin~
into the nex~ Capital I~rovemsnt ~ropram
£olloWS:
II Funding
e) Sta~ is proposing that extensions bo funded
jointly between property owner and the
Department of U~ilities.
b) An Assessmen~ District will be established.
~roperty owners will be assessed $3,000 for
water end $4,000 far ~wer for each home,
or parcel served in addition to the conneCtiOn
e) Ail cver~izing costs will be absorbed by
Department of Utilities in compliance with
Section 20-39 and section 20-71 of the County
Coda.
d) Ail costs ih ~xcess of (b & c) above will be
absorbed by the Depart~ent of utilities.
will he included in the commodity
AyeS: Mr- Ceftin, Mr. Daniel a~d Mr.
Nays~ ~r. Sullivan and Mr. Applegate.
15. ~UB~IC HEA~IN~S
15.A. TO CO,SIDER AN ORDINANCE T0 ~ T~K O ODE OF T~E COUNTY
OF ~'C~-~T~T'~, 1978, AS A~u~m~3~ ~Y Ah~Z~G AND
~WACTIN~ ~CTIONS 21-~0.1 AND 21.1-5.1 RELATIN8 TO
~Ir. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing ~c consider an ordinance to amend the Code of
the County of Chesterfield, 1~7~, as amended, relating to
civil Densities.
Mr. GeorGe ~eadles voiced oppositisn to the propee~d ordinance
and read a statement indicatin~ he felt ~he County should have
only cna method £or handling Special Exseptians, a copy of
which statement is filed with the papers of this Board.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board
adopted thc followinq ordinance~
C~r~a~FIRI~, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AI~t~IDINS AND REENACTIN8
BE IT ORDAINED b~ the Board of supervisors of Chester-
field County~
(1) That ~he Code of ~he County of Chesterfield, 1978,
(a) Any violation of the following provisione of this
section shall be deemed an infraction and shall be punishable
by a civil penalty of one hundred dollars
(1) Operation of a business on a lot or parcel
inside or outside of a dwelling unit or accessory building,
district, withou~ a special exception or conditional use.
(2) Failure to enclose a swimming pool with a
security tlrpe fence er wall not less than four (4) feet in
height in any residential or agricultural dis=riot.
(3) Violation of any condition of zoning, a
conditional use permit or a special exception that relates to
(b) Each day durin~ which say violation of the
existed shall constitute a ~epara=e o~fense. However, in no
event shall any suah violation arising from the ~al~e ~at of
ten (10) day period, ncr shall a $$rie~ of such violatio~s
penalties which exceed a total of three thousand dollars
($3,000.00).
(a) Any violation cf the ~ollowing provisions of this
Ordinance shall ~e ~oemed an infraction and shall be
punishable by a civil penalty of on~ hundred dollars
[1) Operation o~ a business on a lot or parcel
inside or outside of a ~welling ~it or accessory building,
(2) Failure =o enolos~ a swimming pool with a
security tlape fence or wall not lees than four (4) feet in
heiuht in any residential or agricultural ~is~riet.
(3) Violation of any condition of zoning,
the hours of operation of the use of land or that ralates to
(b) ~ach ~ay during which any violation of the
provisions enumerated in paragraph (a) above is found to have
existed shall constitute a separate offe~e, However, in no
90-846 11/14/90
operative ~aots be charged m0r~ fre~ently than once ~n any
ten (10) day period, nor shall a series of such violations
arising from the same ~t of operative facts result in civil
penalties which exceed a to%al of three thousand dollars
o e o
Vote;
O? CHE~'£Z~FIE/~D, 1978 r A~ AMENDED, BY A~DIN6 AND
REENACTING SEC"lIONS 21-3 AND 21.1-281 RRr. ATIN8 TO GROUP
HOMES
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had ~een advertised £or a
public hearing to eenmider an ordinance to amend the Code cf
the Counuy of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, rela~inG to
group homes.
M~. Georg~ Beadles voiced opposition to the proposed ordinanc~
and read a ststement indlcat~n~ he felt that eight individuals
or more should not ~ pexmitted to reside in a structure
served by a septic system as there would be excessive water
usage which could sub~equently result in septic system
problem~, etc~, a sopy of which statement is ~iied with th~
papers of this ~oard.
When asked, Mr. Sale stated this ordinanse is s mandated
chan~e by State l~islation.
On motion of Mr. Apple~a~e, seconded by Mr~ Sullivan, the
Board adopted the following ordinance:
;%NORDIN~CE ~DA~D'I'~ CODE OF 'x~CO~
~E ~T O~AIN~D by the ~oard of Supervisors of Chester-
~ield Count~:
(1) ~at the Code o~ the County of chesterfield, 1978, as
~ended, is amended t~ ~ead as follows:
sec. 21-3. D~finitio~s.
For the purposes of ~his chapter, ~he followinu wmrds and
by this section:
handicapped, mentally ill, mentally r~tarded, d~velopm~ntally
~igabled or ~used or neglected children, in which no more
than eight such individuals resid~ with on~ or mor~ resident
· ection, mental illne~ and developmental disaDility ~kall 50~
i~clude current illegal uss of or addiction to a controlled
suSstance as dofined i~ Sectio~ 54.1-3401 of th~ Code of
virginia, 1950, as ~ended. For the Rurposes o~ this chapter,
a group home shall be considered a dwelline.
O C O
90-a47 11/14/90
Sec. 21.1-281. Definitions.
For the purposes of thi~ chapter, the following words and
phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them
by this ~ectieR:
o o e
Group home. An adult and child caring ~acility, designed to
provide resident services to individuals who are physically
handicapped, mentally ill, mentally retarded, developmentally
disabled or abused or neglected ahildren, iR which no more
than eight such individuals reside with one or more ~esident
counselors or other staff persons. For the purposes of thi~
sectlon~ mental illness and developmental disability shall not
as defined in Se~ticn 54.1-3401 of the Coda of Virginia, 1950,
as amended. For the purposes of this chapter, a group homo
shall be considered s dwelling.
Ayes: ~Lr~ Currin, Mr. Sullivan, ~r. Applegat~ ~ ~r, Daniel.
Ab$~sntion: Mr. Mayes.
Mr. Daniel requested ~is matter be included on the li~t of
t5.c. TO CON$IDER AN OI{DINAN~E TO AMER~ 'r~ CODE OF '£ku~ CO~TY
OF CW~-i-~FT~r~, 1978~._AS AM~NDED~ BY A)~DI~G A~D
REENA6TLNs SECTIONS 21.1-125 A~D 21.1-128 Pd~LATING TO
Mr. sale stated this date and time ha~ Peen advertised for
p~blic hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the Code
the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as ~ended, r~lating to
manufactured home~ ~n agricultural districts.
Mr. George B~adlez voiced support for th~ proposed
as s~mittsd, and r~ad a statement indicating he would like to
$~ the ~oard consider a major r~zoning of th9 entire
and oreat8 a new zoning district for par~els which are located
within close prox~it~ o~ major residential areas, (A copy
~aid statement is filed with the paper~ of thi~ Board. )
Mr. Daniel stated he could not ~upport the proposed ordinance,
as s~mitted, al=hough it was mandated by state law.
On motion of Mr. Apple~a~, seconded by ~r. sullivan, the
Board adopted the following resolution:
~ O~IN~CE ~ ~ T~ c~ OF T~ ~ OF
~T~]K;.D, 1978, ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~A~ING
~S 21.I-125 ~ 21-1-128 ~IN~ ~ ~AC~
IN ~C~ DIS~CTS
BE IT 0~kINED ~y the Board of Sup, rvisors of Chester-
field County:
{1) Tha~ the Code of the County cf ches%gA~.~!~, 1978,
as ~nded, is amended and reenacted to read as follows=
Sec. 21.1-125. Uses pe~it~d with =~=~ain
s~ject to compliance w~th the following conditions and other
o o o
{b) ~anufaotured hom~s ~rovided that individual homes
shall ba (1) nineteen (19) feet or more in width and
90-848 11/14/90
placed cn a permanent foundation, tf these restrictions
subject tO the provisions o~ sections 21.1-14(e) and
21.1-128(b).
Sec. 21.1-128. special exceptions.
The following USes may be allowed by special exception,
subject to the provisions o~ section 21.1-I4.
(b} Individual ~anufactur~d or mobile home=, other than
those psrmit=ed pursuant to section 21.I-125(b], for a period
not to exceed s~v~n (7) year~. At the expiration of the
~even-year pe!ied, application may be made for renewal of the
spuciai e×ception.
Ayes: Mr- Coffin, Mr. Sullivan and M/. Appleqate,
Nays: Mr. Daniel.
I6.A.
16.A.1. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance With
dixec%iens from this Board~ made xeport in writing ~pon his
examination of Tottcross Road, Kirkgate Lan~ and Taekley Place
i~ Sycamore Ridge, Phase II, Clover ~ill District.
Upon eensi~eratlon whereo~, and on motion of Er. Daniel,
~ecended by Mr. Mayes, it is resolved that Tollcross Road,
Kirkgate La~e and Tackley Place in Sycamore Ridge, Phase II,
Clever Hill District, be and they are hereby be e~tablished as
public road~.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and i~ hereby iz raq~ested to take into
Secondary System, Tollcross Road, beginning a= the inter-
section with Evsrgree~ East Parkway, State Route 3970, and
~eing easterly 0.02 mile to the intersection wi~h Taekley
Place, then turning and going southeasterly 0~03 mile to end
at the intersection with Eirkgate Lane; Kirkga~e La~e,
beginning at the i~toxseetio~ With Tollcross Road and goin~
southwestexly 0.07 mile to end in a cul-de-sac, again~
Kirk~ate Lane, beginning at the intersection with
Road and going northeasterl~ 0-04 mile to end in a ~ul-de-sae;
and Tackley ~lace, beuinning at the inter~ection with
Tollcroas Roa~ and going northerly 0.08 mil~ to end in a
oul-de-sa=.
Thls request is inclusive of th~ adjaoont slope, sight
distance and designated Virginia Depar~ent of Transportation
drainage easements.
These roads serve 32 lots.
~d be it ~urther resolved, that the Board of
guarant~s to ~h~ Virginia Depar~n~ of Trans~rt~tion a 40'
right-of-way fo~ all of ~hes~ roads.
V~te: Unanimo~
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Harbour Pointe Road, Eastbluff Road and
Bastbluff Court in Eastbluff an~ Resubdivisicn of =astDlu~,
Clover ~ill District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion ~ Mr. Daniel,
seconded by Mr. ~ayes, it is resolved that Earbour Peinte
Road, Sas=bluff Road and Ea~tbluff Court in gastbluf£ and
Resubdivision of Eastbluff, Clover Hill District, be and they
And be it further resolved, that the Virgiaia Department of
Transportation, be and it h~reby is requested to take into the
secondary System, Harbour Pn~nte Road, beginning at the
intersection with Bayport Landing Road, state Route 3215, and
existing Harhour Pcinte Road, State Route 3200, and going
southerly 0.07 milo ~o e~d at the intersection with Eastbluff
Road; Eaatbluff Road, beginning at the intersection with
~arheur Puint~ Road and going southeasterly 0.07 ~il~ to the
intersection with Eastbluff Court, then continuing southerly
0.05 mile, =hen turning and going easterl~ ~.06 mile to end in
a cul-de-sac; and Ea~tbluff court, b~ginning ~t the inter-
sec%ion with Eas=bluff Road and going 0.08 mile to end in
a cul-de-sac.
This request is inclusiv~ of the adjacent slope~ sight
distance and designated virginia Department of Transportation
drainage easements.
·hese road~ ~erve 30 l~t~.
And be it f~rther resolved, that the Board of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department Of Tr~nspor=ation a ~0~
right-of-way for all o~ these %oadm except Harbo~r Pointe Road
which has an 80' right-of-way.
This mection of Eaatbluff and Re~ubdivision of Eastbluff is
recorded a~ follows:
Plat Book 56, Padua 5~ and 57, Malch 26, 1987.
~lat Book 39, ~ages 51 and 52, September 9, 1987,
This day the County Environmental Enqineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Marb~ur Pointe Road in Land's End, Clover ~ill
District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of ~r. Daniel,
seconded by~r. Ma~x, it is r~solved that ~arhour Pointe Roa~
in Land's End, Clover ~ill District, be and i% h~r~by is
established as a public road.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it hereby is rec/~lested to taka into the
secondary System, Earbcur ~oin~e Road~ beginning at the
inter~ection wi~h Eastbluff Ro~d, State Route number ~o ~
assigned, and existing Barbcur Polnte Road, ~tate Route tO be
a~signed, and going southerly 0.06 mile~ then turning and
going southeasterly 0.07 mite, then ~urni~g and going
~outherly ~.04 mile to end in e temporary turnaround.
Thi~ request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sigh:
distance an~ designated Virginia Depart_~ont of Transportation
drainage easements.
90-850 11/14/90
Thiz road serves 8 lot~.
And be it further r~molved~ that %he Board of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation
variabl~ width right-of-way from 50~ ts 80~.
This section cf Land's End i$ recordsd as follows~
Plat Book 39, ~ages 53 and 54, september 9, 1981.
This day the County Enviro~_mentaI EnginEer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writin~ ~pon his
examination of MEmory Lane in Chestsrfield Meadow~ Office
Park, Matoaoa District.
Upon consideration whereof~ and on ~otio~ o~ Mr. Daniel,
seconded by M~. Mayas, it is resolved that Memory Lane in
Chemterfield Meadows Office Park, Matoaca Dimtric%, be and it
hereby is es~abiimh~d as a public roa~.
And be it further :esoLved, %hat the Vir~ini5 Department of
Transportation, be a~d it hereby i~ requested to take i~to ~he
sacsndary System, MEmory La~e, beginning at the i~te~saction
with Centralia Road, Stat~ Route 145, an~ ~oing southerly 0.15
mile to end a~ the intersection with Chesterfield Meadows
Drive, State Ro~te
This request is inclusive o~ the adjacent s~ops, sight
distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation
drainage easements.
This road m~rv~m as access to commercial properties.
And be it further resolved, the= the Board of Supervisors
guaran=ees to the Virginia Depactment o~ Transportation a 60'
right-of-way for this road.
This section Of Chesterfield Meadows Office Park is recorded
as follows:
Plat Book 60, Page 49, February i9~
Vote: Unanimous
· hla day the County Enviror~ental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made =sport in writing upon his
~xamlnation o~ Timberlake Court and Knobhill Courk in Walton
~ark, Section Q, Midlothian District.
Upon sonsidezation whereof, and on motion of Mr. Daniel,
seconded by Mr. Mayer, it i~ resolved that ~imber~ake Court
and Knobhiil Court in Walton Par~, section ~, ~idlothian
District, b~ und they hereby are established as public roads.
And be it further resolvmd, that the Virginfa Departmea~ of
Transportation, be and i~ hereby is requested to take into the
Seconda~ System, Ti~berlake Court, beginning at the inter-
section with Walton ~ark Road, State Route 624, and going
easterly 8.13 mile to end in a c~l-de-$ac; and KnobhiI! Co=rt,
beginning at the intersection with Walton Park Road, Stats
Route 624, and going easterlw 0.20 mile to end in a
cul-de-sac.
This request is inclusive of the sdjscent slope, sight
distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation
drainage easements.
90-851 11/14/90
And be it further resolved, that the Board of
guarantees to ~he Virginia Department of Transportation a
right-of-way tar all o5 these roads.
This section of Walton Park is recorded as
Section Q. Plat Book 62, Pages 59 and 60, August !0, 1988.
Vote: Unanimous
This day the County Enviror~ental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Boardt made report in writing upon his
examination of ~unt~ate WQQd~ Road in Oak ~prings, Clover Hill
District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on marion of Mr. Daniel,
seconded by Mr. Mayas, it is resolved that H~ntgate Woods Road
in Oak Springs, Clover ~ill District, be and it hereby is
established as a public road.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it he~eD¥ is requested tO take into the
Secondary S~stem, Hunt,ate Woods Road, beginning at existing
Hunt,ate Woods Roa~, State Route 259~, and ~oin~ northwesterly
0.05 mile to the inaermection with itself, then continuing
northwesterly 0.12 milm, then turniDg and ~oin~ westerly 0.04
mi!e, then turning and ~eing ~outherly 0.0~ mile, then turning
and goin~ southeasterly 0.11 mile, then t~rning and going
easterly 0.09 mile to end at the intersection with itself.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight
distance and designated virginia Department of TranspOrtation
drainage easements.
This road serves 49 lots.
And be it further resolved, that the Bomrd of supervisors
guarantmes to the Virginia Department Of Transpoz~ation a 50'
right-ct-way for this read.
This section o~ Euntgat~ Woods is recorded as follows:
Plat Boo~ 64, Pages 91 ~ 92, Januar~ 4, ~989.
Vote: UnanimOUS
16.A.2. P~STS FOR BINGO/P~%FFL~ PE~ITS
On motion o~ ~r. Daniel, seconded by Mr. ~ayes, the Board
approved requests for binge/raffle permits for the !allowing
organizations for calendar yea% 1991;
o~ANIBATIC~
Manchester Athletic ASSOO,
Post 2239 Veterans of Foreign
Wars ct U.S.
Bi,hep Ireton council #~189
Knight= of Columbus
St. Ann's Ca~holic Church
Clover Hill Cheerleaders
Bingo/Raffle
Bingo/Raffle
Bingo/Raffle
Ra£fle
90-852 11/14/90
FOR =~u~ ~'~-£~ICK ~0UTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION
On motion of Mr. Panini, $~conde~ by ~r. Mayes, the Board
~ttrick You:h Sports Aaaociation and transferred $3,000 from
the Matoaca ~ree Cent ~uad F~d, for a total of ~,000.00, to
=h~ Parks and Recreation Depar~ent budget to a~ist the
~ttrick ~outh Sports Association in the 9urchase o~ uniforms
and sporta equipment.
16.A.4. AGPd~H~T CONC~NIN9 STORM WAT~ ~5%NAG~ SYSTEM FOR
On motion of Mr. Danielr seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to execute a Storm Water
Management s~stem Agreement with the chesterfield County
School Boar~ for Woolridge Road Elementary school, with the
CoUnty's only involvement being to assure that the maintenance
agreement is being followed by the owner. (It is noted a copy
of said Agree/~ent is filed with th~ Da~rs of this Board.)
Veto: Unanimous
16.A.5. ~O~TE 360 WIDENING F~OM ~IT0 i%OAD TO COUR~0~E ROAD
On motion cf Mr. Daniel, seconded by ~r. Mayes, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHF~A~AS, Route 360, Hull Street Road, i~ Oon~ested and
needs to be improved; and
Wq{EREAS, The widening of ~ull Street Read is on the
County's priority list o~ highway improvements; and
WHEREAS, The Virginia Dep~rt/nent of Transportation [VDOT)
has developed a d~ig~ fO~ th~ widening of ~uli Street Road.
NOW, T~R~FORE, BE IT RES0LV~D, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisor~ ~upports ~OT's pla~$ ~O widen
design so that ~i~h% lanes wall be provided in lieu of =ix
lanes, curb and ~==er will b~ provided throughout the length
of the project, the Suncrest Drive intersection will have a
five-lan~ typical aection~ =he improvement of courthouse Road
will bu extended north of Rockwocd Park a~d ade~ate access
Courthouse Road.
B~ IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that tho ~oard urge~ ~OT to
procee~ with the wi~enin~ as quickly am possible.
Vote: Unanimous
SEX DATE FOR PUBLI~ H~%R~NGS
O~ ~otion of Mr. Daniel, seuunded by Mr. Mayes, th~ Bo&~d set
the date of January ~, 1991 at 7:00 p.m. for a public hearing
90-853 11/i4/90
to consider the U~r swift Creek Plan, which Plan will amend
part of the Powhite/Route 288 Development Area Plan, a part of
the so~prehensive Plan for Chesterfield.
16.A.6.b. TO CONSIDHR AN ORDINANCE TO A~H~ND 'r'a~ CODE OF ~
COUNTT OF ~u~S~mKFIRT.~, 197~t AS AMENDED~ BY ADDING
SECTIONS 21-24t '£~KOUGH 21-228 AND S~CTIONS
the da~e of January 9, 1991 at 7:00 p.m. for a public hearing
to consider the U~per Swift Creek Water ~ual£ty Ordinance.
I~.A.~.O. ~0 ~ONSIDE~ A~ OP~DI~ANCE TO AMEND
COUNTY OF ca~$TE~FI~LD, 1978, A~._AM~D~D, BY
20-63.1 P~r-ATING ~UA~LLY TO MANDATORY
WATER AND SEW~CONN~CTION~ IN 'rhu~UPPERSWiFT
0n motion of ~r. Daniel, seconded by Mr. AD,legate, the Uoard
set ~he date of January 9, 1991 at 7;00 p.m. for a p~lic
hearing ~o consider an ordinance ~ ~end the code of th~
County of chesterfield, 1978, a~ ~ended, relating gun~rall~
Creek Watershed.
Ayes: Mr. Currin, Mr. Applegat~, Mr. Daniel and Mr. sullivan.
~s~ention: Mr. Mayer, as he wished %o place as much ~phasis
as he could on the need for public wa~er and
sewer.
36.A.6.d. TO COB~DEK AN OI{DINA~C~ TO AM]~ID THE CODE OF ~
COUNTY OF CbU~Tb:KFI~T.~, 1978~ AS ~D~, ~'g
A~DIN~ AND I~2qAC~ING SECTION 14.1-26 RELATINC~
On motion of ~. Daniel, seconded by ~r. Mayer, the Board
the date of becember 12, 1990 at 9~00 a.m. for a p~lic
hearing to con,idek an ordinanoe to amend the~C~' of
~uunty of Chesterfield, 1978, as ~ended, relating %o the
l~Ua~Cu of motor v~hicle lioenses.
16.A.5.e. TO CONSIDER Al)OFT/ON OF ~/~ ~ TO SECTION
4-33 OF '£~u~ CO~2Y COD= DEFINING T~E ~C~f/V~ DATE
OF AN INCREASE TO T~ COUITI~'S AUDIT FEE FO~ BINGO
on motion O~ ~r. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
adopted the following ordinance Qn an emergency basis and ~et
~hu da~e ~f Janual-f 9, 1991 at 7:00 p+~. for a Rublic hearing
to consider readopD~¢~ Of said ordinance on a permanent ba~is~
AN ORDINANCE TO A~NDTHE CODK OF u,,-q'r~a(FIP~.~. I978,
AS AMENDED, BY k~FDING SECTION 4-33 OF ANTICI~ IV
RELATING TO ~INGO GAMES AND P~FFLES
BE IT ORDAINED by ~he Board of Supervisors of Chester-
~ield County that the Cod~ Of ~ke County of Chesterfield,
90-854 11/14/90
197~, as ~mended, i~ a~e~dsd hy amending section 4-33 as
f01tow~
Sec. 4-33, Audit
~very organization authorized to coDduct bingo games a~d
raffles pursuant to this arti0!e shall pay an audit fee equal
to two p~rcent of the gross receipts which a~ organization
reports pursuant to Section 4-32, provided that if the gross
receipts of an organization are le~ than two thousand dollars
~$2~000.00) for the designated reportln~ p~rlod, such audit
fee is waived. "~ross receipts", as ~ed i~ this
means the total amount o~ mone~ recaived from ~i~go, instant
bingo, an~ raffla operations beform th~ deduction of expenmem
or prizes. Such audit f~e shall be d~rmined ~y the gross
receipts shown on %he ~inan~ial report, subject to correctne~
by audit, and shall accompany such report require~ tQ be filed
with the i~ternal audi~ depa~t~eRt oD or before November 1 of
each year pursuant to section 4~32.
Th~ ~wo percent audit fee shall applX to all the gross
reo~ipt~ ~or games eonducte~ after O0tob~r I, 1990. The audit
fee for games cO~duct~d prior to that date shall be one
Vote: Unanimous
· 6.B.1. STREET LIGHT REQI~STS
OD motion cf ~r. DanieI~ seconded by Mr. Appl~a=~ ~he ~uard
approved 0b~ainin~ cos~ estimates for the installation of a
street light at the following locations~
l. Vicinity of 3700 Curtis Street, Bermuda District;
2. Intersection of ClaypOO1 Road and Greencastle Road,
C~over Bill District; and
3. ~ad ~nd of Marvett~ Drive, Dale District.
Vote: Unan~ous
Mr. Daniel stated his rece~e~ation 'for approval of the
installation of a ~treet light at the dead end o~ Harvette
Driv~ was based on h~atth, safety and welfare concerns for the
residents of that area.
16.D,2- ST~EET LIG~T INSTALLATION COST APP~0VAL
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Fir. Mayes~ the Beard
approved ~he oost~ fo~ ~reat light installation a~ the
i~t~r~tion of Lawnwood Road and Slumber Lane, in the ay~0~nt
of $337.00, in addition to the exis=in~ appropriation of
$1,017.00 approved at the August 22, 1990 ~oard of Supervisors
meeting, and for the relocation of the mtreet light on pole
9QF44 to pole #CF46 in the vicinity of Beulah united Methodist
Church at 6925 Hopkins Road, in the amount of $757.00,
totalling $1,094.00, which funds wall he ,xpended from the
Dale District Street Light Fund.
90-855 11/14/90
16.C. UTILITIF~M Dw.p~=~4~NT IT~SS
16.C.l.a. ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCel OF LAND FOR A PORTION OF
partner in property to which Huguenot Hundred Road will
of interest pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive Con:lict
accepted on behalf of the County the conveyance cf a 0.143
Road, which dedication will allow access to Huguenet sprinus
Road in Chesterfield County via Huguenot Hun~re~
necessary deed~ {It is noted a copy of said plat is ~iled
Ayes: Mr. Currin, Mr. sullivan, Mr. Daniel and Mr.
Absent: Mr. kpplegate.
Mr. Applegate returned to th~ meeting.
16.c.l.b. ACCEPTANCE OF PARCEL OP [,AND D~SI[~qA~ AS PRICE
On motion of Mr. Appleqats, seconded by Mr. Daniel, she Boa~
accepted on behalf of th~ County the conveyance o~ a 2.415
H. Staples, Jr., and authorized the County Administrator to
execute the necessary deed. (It i8 noted a copy of said plat
ig filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote:
16.c.l.c. AFFROVAL OF CHANSB ORDER FOR ~ ~INEI~IN8
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved the change order for engineering con~rac~ 's~rvioe~
for the Prootorm Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion
with R. Stuart Royer & Associates, the estimated cost of said
services being $20,000 and authorized the County AdministratOr
to m×ecute the necessary decuments for same. (It is noted
Improvement Budget.)
16.C.i.'~. C~$IDI~AT~0~ OF A ~S~ FOR A ~I~ ~T~SI~ OF
~ motion of Mr. Appl~at~, ~on~ed by ~r. Daniel, the ~uar~
approved a r~q~emt from Pioneer Financial Corporation for a
one ~ear time extension on eliuibility ref~d~ for Project
85-7057, Crocker ~ranoh TrB~k Sewer, fro~ Centralia Road to
Wrexh~ Estates Subdivision and that it be approved with the
stipulation ~hat no further time extensions be granted.
90-85~ I1/14/90
16.c.t.~. AMEI~rm~T TO ~ ~INEERIKG CONTHACT WIT~ ~IAZEN AND
SA%;YER, P.C. FOR I~PROVEMENTSTOTH~WIi~fCREEK
On motion of ~r. Ap~l~gat~, se=o~ded by Mr. Daniel~ th~ Board
approved ~en~en% =o the e~gi~eering contract with ~az~n and
Sa~mr P.C. ~Or improvements (~e~erminatlon of a cha~ge in the
m~thod of disinfection} to the Swift Cre~k Water Treatment
~lant (~rojest 88-0161R) ~o achieve compliance with th~ Safe
DriVing Water AC~ Requirementa and authorized the County
A~inistrator to execute th~ necessary doc~en~s, (I% is
noted funds are provided in the capital Improv~e~t Budget.)
Vote: unanimous
t6.c.l.f. RE{)U~RT TO 9UITCSATM A ~ORTION OF A WA'r~ EA~T
ACROSS P~P~ ~ BY ~T~I~L
~CIA~
On motio~ of Mr. Applegate, seconded b~ Mr. Daniel, the ~ourd
approved a T~g~st from J. K. Tigons & A~OCi~ to
quitclaim a portion of a 16 foot and variable width wa=ur
easement acros~ property owne~ ~y Chesterfiel~ ~11
Assooia~e~, A Virginia General Partnership, at the
authorized ~hu Chairman of ~h$ Board end County A~inistrator
to execute said ~itclaim. (A copy of said plat is filed with
Vot~: Unanimou~
16.C.l-g- CON%~EYANC~ OF AN EAS~NT TO WI~GtNIA ELECT~/C
POWER COMPA~YATMIDLOTHIAN~DD~ ~C~OOL
On motion Of Mr. Applegate, seconded by ~r. Daniel, the Board
authorized the Chairman o~ the B~ard and the County
Administrator to execute an easement agreement with Virginia
E!ectzic a~d power Company to install a pole and guy wire
within a 15 foot easement at Mi~luthia~ ~iddle SshooI, for
~ervice in conjunction with the widening of Route ~. (A copy
o~ raid plat is filed with the 9a~ers of ~his Board.)
16.C.l.h. ACCEPTANCK O1~ PARCmr.~ OF LAND
16.C.~.h.1. ALONG G~ITO ROAD AND R~LL ST~gET
KI~CO~RATI~
on motion o~ Mr- Applegate, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the
accepted o~ b~half o~ the County the coeveyanoe o~ a 0.13 acre
parcel of ~and along Genito Road and Hull Street Road from
Burger King corporation, A F~erida Corporation, and author£zed
th~ CO%%nty Administrator to execute the necessary deed. (A
copy of said plat ie filed with the papers o~ this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
16.~.1.~.2. ALON~ WA~E BOTTOM SPP-ING R0~D AND RouT~ 10 F~OM
M..~. DOROTHY T. ESTE$, THD~T~
On mo~ion cf Mr. Applegat~, seconded by Mr. Daniel~ the Board
accepted un Dehalf of ~he County the ~onveyanoe cf ~ 0.119
acre parcel of land along Ware Bottom Spring Road and Route 10
from Ma. Doroth~ T. Estes, Trustee, and authorized the County
90-857 11/14/90
Administrator to execute the necessary deed.
plat is filed with the DaDer~ of this Board.)
Vote:
(A copy of said
ALONG
On motion cf Mr. Applegate, seconded by ~r. Daniel, the Board
accepted on behalf of the County the conveyance o~ a 0.162
acre parcel of land along Ramblewee~ Drive from C. B. Estes,
and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
necessary deed. (A copy of said plat is filed with the papers
cf this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
16.C.2. RE~0RT$
Mr. Sale presented the Board with a report en the developer
water and sewer oon~rac=~ executed by ~he County Admini~tra-
16.D.
Mr. Ramsey presented the Board with a sta=us r~po=~ on the
~eneral Fund Contingency Ao¢0~, General ~und Balance,
Reserve for Future capital Projects, District Read ann street
Light Fund~, Lease ~uruhases and School Board Agenda.
has ioiq~ally notified the County cf the acceptance of the
following roads into the State seoundary System:
ADDiTiONS L~T~
ARBOR L~ING - SECTIONS 1 & ~ (Effective
Rou:e 4800 (~_rbor Green Drive) - From Route 1569 to
0.10 mile West Route 4803 0.22
~oute 4801 (Arbor Green court) - From Rcut~ 4800
to 0.03 mil~ ~ast Rout~ 4800 0.03 Mi.
Rout~ 4802 (Oak~ruok Lane) - Fmum Route 4800 to
0.08 mile Southwest Route 4800 0.08 Mi.
~eute 4803 (Walnut Landing Wa~) - From Ro~te
to 0.18 mile Southeast Route 4~Q0 0.18
Route 4810 (Arbor Banks Terrace) - From RouSe
to 0.06 mile Merthwes~ Route 4813 0.21 Mi.
Route 4811 (~ickery Landing Place) - From ROUte 4810
to 0.06 mile South Rout~ 4810 0.06 ~i.
Routs 4~I2 (Maple Landing Place)IFrom Route 4810
to 0.07 miI~ North Route 4~10 0.~7 Mi.
Route 4813 (Arbor Banks COUIt) - From Route 4810
%0 0.03 mile Southwest Route 4810 0.03 Mi.
Route 4814 (Arbor Highlands Terrace) - Prom Route
4810 to 0~09 mile South Route 4~10 0.0~ ~i.
Route 4814 (Hidden Arbor Place) - From Route 4810
to 0.05 mite East Route 4810 0~5 Mi.
90-858 11/14/90
FER~BROOKr ~A~DING COURT [Effeetiv~ %0/29/90)
Route ~42~ (~a~ding Court) - From ROUte 4420 to
Q.04 mile southeast Route 4420 0-04
~ISTWOOD FOREST - SECTIONS 1, 2 & 3 (Effective
Route 3473 (Eagle Rock Avenue} - From RoUte
to Route 3470-North 0.23
Route 3475 (A~glewood ~rive) - From Rout~ 3473 to
0,05 mile W~st Route 3476 0.11
Route 3476 (Anglewood court] - From Rou~e 3475 to
0.06 mile ~orth Route 3475 0,06
to 0.12 mile South Route 3473
COURTHOU$~ WOODS SECTION 3 (Effective
ROU~e 3154 (Eu~ti~g RQa~) - From Route 3154
mile East RoUte 3158 tc 0.10 mile ~ast Route 3158 0.07 Mi.
Route 4612 (~rcnspark Road) - F=om 0.03 mile South
Route 3154 to 0.13 mile ~orth~a~t Route 3154 0.16 Mi.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by ~r. Sullivan, the Board
adjourne~ at 9:00 p,m. (~ST) until 9~00 a.m. (~ST) on November
28,
VO~e: UnanimoUS
County Administrator
Chairman
90-859 11/14/90